{"meta":{"query_hash":"d87fc62dd7b1","filters":{"venue":"American Sociological Review"},"cohort_total":62,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":62,"exported":62,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d87fc62dd7b1","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=American+Sociological+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1965387020","doi":"10.1177/000312240807300108","title":"Job Mobility and Wage Trajectories for Men and Women in the United States","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":185,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; National Longitudinal Surveys; Differential (mechanical device); Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Inequality; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Social mobility; Economics; Labour economics; Work (physics); Survey data collection; Wage growth; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.12363492238520045,"score_gpt":0.44785005935608113,"score_spread":0.32421513697088067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965387020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924827,0.004876222,0.00004037332,0.0006163622,0.000018698696,0.000004609575,0.0005288999,0.0000027405697,0.0014293534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950153,0.0037734942,0.000049403978,0.000067166664,0.000017554084,0.000008641788,0.00052868447,0.0000012468472,0.00053841947],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998486,0.00003621128,0.000012897377,0.000024403695,0.000033299606,0.0000445856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996958,0.000050424565,0.00011213755,0.000010344766,0.00004374975,0.00008760826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000568435,0.00009779174,0.00020516352,0.00084254914,0.00058799813,0.0005305674,0.0002521771,0.0003083563,0.0014346944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012677654,0.000116364216,0.0002767995,0.0010389255,0.00016646109,0.0004142081,0.00044772666,0.00032041036,0.00025018438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008823808,0.0000720308,0.96590513,0.000041152754,0.00007220343,0.00011415425,0.0017166109,0.00016635122,0.0000672743,0.00046149374,0.001432287,0.029863073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031513925,0.000043830994,0.99637824,0.000044459375,0.000013272667,0.00005165854,0.0017212307,0.00010414394,0.0000112851185,0.00013699754,0.0014886494,0.0000031190293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04549031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09282955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04549031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048163248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044765923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09045106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980513654","doi":"10.1177/000312240707200506","title":"Corporate Demography and Income Inequality","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Labour economics; Inequality; Wage; Economics; Proxy (statistics); Variance (accounting); Economic inequality; Demographic economics; Horizontal and vertical; Variation (astronomy); Wage dispersion; Census; Efficiency wage; Geography; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.06676515257192964,"score_gpt":0.2960416840640138,"score_spread":0.22927653149208418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980513654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804292,0.0021919871,0.001347953,0.00081206893,0.000006833497,0.0000068707054,0.00040120492,0.000004578409,0.01479935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99911076,0.0003693781,0.000096311494,0.000015377425,0.000009249823,0.0000022737318,0.00010562739,7.072772e-7,0.00029039208],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972206,0.00008713868,0.000012223217,0.000044212073,0.000040263072,0.000094062896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816555,0.0005578087,0.00079622696,0.00010869394,0.0001696949,0.00020200564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004464043,0.00010723355,0.0001768935,0.001713169,0.00035450174,0.0007202431,0.00021389776,0.00020928698,0.0028964807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00255542,0.000061626146,0.00014790587,0.0022195196,0.0006699239,0.00074189925,0.00086682674,0.00027122858,0.00019116171],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006027204,0.00006710417,0.9196264,0.000056477642,0.000088022825,0.00025709163,0.0018138614,0.0031685017,0.0003136323,0.046572216,0.0009974579,0.026978798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003606725,0.00002394754,0.9790069,0.000046034802,0.000015038544,0.00015302963,0.0016450094,0.0024086263,0.00008724672,0.013305351,0.0032999753,0.000005310464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073272754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072737564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073272754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068285875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016333508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0145692825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995578715","doi":"10.1177/0003122414564182","title":"Pulling Closer and Moving Apart","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Harvard Business School; University of Chicago","keywords":"Politics; Interpersonal influence; Elite; Voting; Political science; Voting behavior; Identity (music); Interpersonal communication; Normative; Social identity theory; Convergence (economics); Social psychology; Sociology; Identity politics; Political economy; Positive economics; Social group; Psychology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.17816237642066868,"score_gpt":0.4456048628611282,"score_spread":0.26744248644045954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995578715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5516577,0.010566477,0.026094547,0.016913652,0.0011313651,0.00016373328,0.00009289068,0.00015291282,0.39322674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96287507,0.0053057256,0.0042403317,0.0021232618,0.00033205387,0.000057635876,0.00008694022,0.00009103432,0.024887923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963148,0.0015656204,0.00013390472,0.00072032306,0.00071007246,0.00055525784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972474,0.0008037077,0.000670688,0.0003667249,0.00036431896,0.0005470447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026570077,0.00040482383,0.00070828595,0.00231149,0.0050576106,0.004865579,0.0011277609,0.0013498559,0.010972341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006082164,0.00034556683,0.00059047964,0.0018795362,0.0077849105,0.0055312472,0.008579947,0.0020894303,0.0019806204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014177544,0.00022437813,0.047436524,0.0010390126,0.00031231408,0.0013664168,0.1164525,0.0010756308,0.0049243597,0.4225914,0.011865619,0.39257005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052099393,0.0003376316,0.09681524,0.0010526394,0.00024827832,0.0010621675,0.08987006,0.0012502782,0.0022798972,0.17149833,0.6354229,0.0001104147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030503077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049907514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010972341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010960203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012249757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03670615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044815401","doi":"10.1177/0003122411401252","title":"Cultural Anchors and the Organization of Differences","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Northwestern University; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Princeton University","keywords":"Nexus (standard); Sociology; Lesbian; Conversation; Politics; Situated; Context (archaeology); Dichotomy; Dissent; Mechanism (biology); Transgender; Human sexuality; Gender studies; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Communication","score_opus":0.07115952696798843,"score_gpt":0.33158596145068575,"score_spread":0.2604264344826973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044815401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7456524,0.011913211,0.01057864,0.012402663,0.00018520217,0.000052117208,0.00009314752,0.00003883822,0.2190838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99647766,0.0014653306,0.0007113172,0.000121171586,0.000023763634,0.00001115165,0.000016474296,0.0000071705676,0.0011659483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955173,0.0028409762,0.00013897731,0.00052123127,0.00064995716,0.00033158375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958144,0.0021143642,0.0010459921,0.00033348618,0.0004466668,0.0002450947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004046365,0.00023777444,0.0002886656,0.003957008,0.002997324,0.005190892,0.00082016725,0.0007317405,0.0026301611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072028087,0.00018677686,0.00020307736,0.0030171203,0.018816879,0.0047664675,0.003575493,0.0011028155,0.00015780689],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045231965,0.000028555833,0.019323241,0.00023169468,0.000058231348,0.00027549386,0.107969664,0.00051998434,0.001035563,0.8006438,0.0011940921,0.068674475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037304588,0.00008913277,0.08887702,0.00046228094,0.000087163135,0.00034413938,0.22298187,0.0009287733,0.00083961943,0.56157315,0.12372082,0.000058668207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058456557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066494006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058456557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045671174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00183499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033136904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050440542","doi":"10.1177/000312240507000103","title":"The Discourse of Globalization: Framing and Sensemaking of an Emerging Concept","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":519,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sensemaking; Framing (construction); Globalization; Newspaper; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Media studies; Public relations; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.0436819171830775,"score_gpt":0.43977108515807883,"score_spread":0.3960891679750013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050440542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4326547,0.023853166,0.1318613,0.08559765,0.0015941145,0.00020897563,0.00018077574,0.00015492931,0.32389438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851518,0.002520633,0.008853277,0.00079451513,0.00034387514,0.00006635273,0.000037847843,0.00006222441,0.0021695318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97580564,0.01939934,0.0006144654,0.0010778928,0.002469334,0.00063328963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9712209,0.022004189,0.002449832,0.0020361708,0.0015856852,0.0007031012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031787638,0.00089119887,0.00088393566,0.0068100602,0.006083525,0.01661257,0.0017559362,0.003303058,0.0020501737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025847288,0.0005279057,0.00070569234,0.0050971117,0.052406825,0.018674906,0.008308393,0.00446715,0.00026181436],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003875158,0.00001887917,0.0013740025,0.00014835307,0.000014691493,0.00045036722,0.42722937,0.0002293667,0.0009066665,0.55300695,0.0010396064,0.015543021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025469808,0.000055821438,0.0024283621,0.0010867326,0.00004120551,0.00053599494,0.34016132,0.001349765,0.0011202149,0.5534153,0.09971494,0.00006486074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019393668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014091067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031787638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047082985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030176712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16811109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053225233","doi":"10.1177/000312240707200509","title":"Right-Wing Parties and Anti-foreigner Sentiment in Europe","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Right wing; Wing; Political science; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04113933714586341,"score_gpt":0.36674036781248837,"score_spread":0.32560103066662494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053225233","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0499071,0.8872772,0.00022931027,0.01469143,0.0015155406,0.0000042383663,0.00003397136,0.000003015834,0.04633815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40892524,0.5796544,0.00012827977,0.0041089104,0.0029193347,0.0000063228345,0.00006010437,0.0000037527775,0.004193621],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999503,0.00022275555,0.00003375132,0.000045708322,0.000102367376,0.00009248114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909747,0.0004939694,0.00019894374,0.000024231476,0.00013118415,0.00005436076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013961523,0.00024490902,0.0004289322,0.0020387152,0.00083023927,0.0025381905,0.00028766034,0.0016901989,0.0017328713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00200576,0.00010498745,0.00027354792,0.003694541,0.002037756,0.0016448848,0.00076169777,0.0009293575,0.00014353484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050858926,0.00022435976,0.050959915,0.005793487,0.0006261527,0.0023416535,0.0073595997,0.0016459994,0.000969181,0.42516786,0.057722222,0.44668087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000689521,0.00015747179,0.24371737,0.00485202,0.00035325685,0.0019105282,0.0098339515,0.0005862029,0.0003902902,0.06686835,0.6712124,0.000049267506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003022541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051103877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003022541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076439255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012305581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0073836446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066784166","doi":"10.1177/000312240707200406","title":"Who Survives on Death Row? An Individual and Contextual Analysis","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Ideology; Politics; Explanatory power; Power (physics); Psychology; Presidential system; Social psychology; Criminology; Capital (architecture); Face (sociological concept); State (computer science); Event (particle physics); Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence; History","score_opus":0.09109832674413425,"score_gpt":0.42924508714874804,"score_spread":0.3381467604046138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066784166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968286,0.00045814438,0.00035464173,0.0004886752,0.0000069843645,0.000015517791,0.00014321088,0.0000028248573,0.0017013657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995159,0.00020417516,0.000082768616,0.000023048262,0.0000050491926,0.0000050627946,0.000049669954,8.321928e-7,0.000113584465],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985512,0.00079328544,0.00009180967,0.00020220765,0.00012297857,0.00023853438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99671894,0.0012752361,0.0012813003,0.00019847201,0.00024909238,0.00027696323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017195605,0.00009039238,0.00042803763,0.0007553772,0.00066817674,0.00094248215,0.0003523162,0.00030406317,0.0016218486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065980083,0.000107542604,0.00036675055,0.00080548966,0.00059864053,0.0008985753,0.00081502803,0.0004447921,0.00016138844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106267886,0.00008248613,0.9805846,0.000043538654,0.00016115412,0.00036799593,0.0019788225,0.00030832793,0.0001013992,0.0012682555,0.00036677445,0.014630354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034989341,0.00012590902,0.9843078,0.000043729153,0.0001176526,0.0003840131,0.010869207,0.0010076484,0.00010958305,0.0016046428,0.0014090927,0.000017172599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061223893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012140236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061223893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005770463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005403947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012173474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074830437","doi":"10.1177/000312240907400302","title":"A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":705,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Epistemology; Sociology; Action (physics); Sociological theory; Social theory; Mechanism (biology); Social science; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.06515577497735647,"score_gpt":0.4045437338322325,"score_spread":0.33938795885487605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074830437","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010185932,0.019100012,0.47198445,0.10023435,0.001505724,0.00027395078,0.00022189888,0.00024381891,0.39624986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7438435,0.01734677,0.16908653,0.011328846,0.0030508484,0.0019423218,0.00021599182,0.00014796533,0.053037122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940487,0.0029029003,0.00026165327,0.001080056,0.0014656939,0.00024102557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99521637,0.002769148,0.00049530476,0.00079426635,0.0005728002,0.00015207412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009891518,0.0009958005,0.0011829006,0.003895844,0.002450629,0.0077913846,0.0032575268,0.004570034,0.005032696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00892568,0.0006310369,0.0014417849,0.0020746596,0.041996546,0.012772866,0.004365423,0.0063504474,0.0014433566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.424683e-7,0.0000019280103,0.000021576296,0.000018861312,0.0000027791693,0.0000069898297,0.00021197904,0.00015830141,0.000012838315,0.9982481,0.00027894505,0.0010370396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046950795,0.0000049777027,0.00003738811,0.00003202256,0.0000033525077,0.000028574963,0.0000666653,0.00034790838,0.000023851198,0.9816087,0.017839175,0.0000027365033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014591069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090703834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009891518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004592479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050538997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052312016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077874692","doi":"10.1177/0003122411435477","title":"Is Breastfeeding Truly Cost Free? Income Consequences of Breastfeeding for Women","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Breastfeeding Practices and Influences","field":"Medicine","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Breastfeeding; Earnings; Medicine; Breast feeding; National Longitudinal Surveys; Work (physics); Psychology; Breast milk; Nursing; Demographic economics; Demography; Family medicine; Pediatrics; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07214629878549111,"score_gpt":0.38272595884788974,"score_spread":0.3105796600623986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077874692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66534823,0.2272066,0.00019421645,0.06683508,0.00044728973,0.000010218712,0.00037241192,0.0000066486314,0.039579425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8947139,0.101850465,0.000101487174,0.0017117634,0.00034861758,0.0000065376894,0.00007456239,0.0000036474612,0.001189029],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993537,0.00032794333,0.000031991465,0.00003299735,0.0001315566,0.00012176005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871266,0.00054662465,0.00045573563,0.000045130353,0.00011300006,0.00012690552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009677408,0.00007895727,0.00024983732,0.00032969163,0.00042949783,0.00075080217,0.0003023242,0.00043398837,0.0015320997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038577924,0.00007755711,0.0002059644,0.0006403658,0.00077527977,0.00053645915,0.00047818033,0.00044288143,0.00014772432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006368164,0.00021841958,0.4647839,0.0011913555,0.0004068813,0.003952788,0.007326609,0.0003118843,0.0017089045,0.025526522,0.016469227,0.47746667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017766592,0.00021934953,0.89665735,0.0010864809,0.00018524287,0.0031229286,0.012720009,0.00009397316,0.00040214867,0.009110395,0.07635798,0.000026323385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052031963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009626044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052031963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064171694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055276573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010345817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082614797","doi":"10.1177/000312240607100302","title":"Trends in Civic Association Activity in Four Democracies: The Special Case of Women in the United States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Waterloo; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); State (computer science); Voluntary association; Political science; Demographic economics; Physical activity; Civic engagement; Test (biology); Demography; Psychology; Sociology; Politics; Medicine; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.038509289502745646,"score_gpt":0.3462359057468217,"score_spread":0.3077266162440761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082614797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997531,0.0005609097,0.00002233811,0.00016784015,0.000005342884,0.000002979102,0.0001460875,0.0000012645918,0.0015622715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987697,0.00056716235,0.000038862963,0.000040935392,0.000007364636,0.0000045868837,0.00018423659,6.8252234e-7,0.00038631936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997975,0.00005257128,0.000014377809,0.00003610488,0.0000291203,0.00007033688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940145,0.0000996412,0.0002384392,0.000027329093,0.000098927,0.00013424324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004667119,0.000111119574,0.00021852816,0.0013876408,0.0006145153,0.0006009,0.00018561806,0.00028115776,0.0010500122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001154445,0.00007948247,0.00015946182,0.0019423391,0.00028078593,0.0004433911,0.0004194937,0.00029656893,0.00015834499],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004124851,0.000028465882,0.9871329,0.000016720207,0.00002124928,0.00006480699,0.0016657691,0.000027499505,0.00015781859,0.00013142398,0.00031123555,0.010400865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015091633,0.000035831385,0.9954769,0.000009174807,0.000011836779,0.00009318351,0.0027760586,0.000045079047,0.000049403283,0.00003775421,0.0014609916,0.0000023599891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05255129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.147341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05255129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006363034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039064445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10449082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083683399","doi":"10.1177/000312240907400606","title":"When Work Interferes with Life: Work-Nonwork Interference and the Influence of Work-Related Demands and Resources","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":481,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Perspective (graphical); Distribution (mathematics); Social psychology; Set (abstract data type); Work stress; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.021838152229167622,"score_gpt":0.29491613026789837,"score_spread":0.27307797803873074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083683399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967483,0.0006278404,0.00023413231,0.00031970613,0.000008675135,0.0000057371744,0.000060275062,0.0000016705145,0.0019935628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99958926,0.00021444973,0.00004768575,0.000024466566,0.000011347353,0.0000043772698,0.000040784395,0.0000010602776,0.00006655791],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975431,0.0011416938,0.0002370666,0.00019199941,0.00060551404,0.0002806189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99193794,0.0028855861,0.003689301,0.00034415786,0.0005118483,0.0006311087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021739285,0.0001919449,0.00040148542,0.0017293856,0.00090236106,0.0012993241,0.0004831743,0.0003354302,0.0011226496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009983697,0.00017085992,0.0003091873,0.0017105198,0.0009823921,0.000829057,0.0017522449,0.00056664395,0.00011825927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044098495,0.000037305388,0.98683923,0.00002548742,0.000051777795,0.00012618663,0.0031477385,0.00005234564,0.00020229493,0.00027300665,0.000121847654,0.009078608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011917889,0.000019381123,0.994146,0.000013939597,0.000007788044,0.00012178822,0.0050816354,0.00006331632,0.00003285995,0.00017360695,0.00033420048,0.0000042665843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062158406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01258774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062158406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054933387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005325622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012359321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085024069","doi":"10.1177/000312240607100305","title":"“Fair” Inequality? Attitudes toward Pay Differentials: The United States in Comparative Perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":452,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Inequality; Earnings; World Values Survey; General Social Survey; Survey data collection; Demographic economics; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Convergence (economics); Exceptionalism; Value (mathematics); Economic inequality; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Economic growth; Demography; Population; Census; Law","score_opus":0.20877655861426714,"score_gpt":0.47703524683238036,"score_spread":0.2682586882181132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085024069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8534587,0.041519485,0.00025113695,0.020001296,0.00024093564,0.000008291777,0.00028698088,0.0000044467247,0.0842288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859341,0.010946175,0.00008401952,0.0016221387,0.00009666069,0.00000616579,0.000107127285,0.0000018527525,0.0012018661],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999514,0.00029470815,0.000017829112,0.000038860482,0.0000739987,0.000060589475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915504,0.00043419772,0.00013032478,0.000032497817,0.00017265872,0.00007521646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014808853,0.00009910527,0.00022753791,0.0016726038,0.0009992551,0.0015165508,0.00019955114,0.0006116262,0.002363498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020432353,0.00006929911,0.00014151804,0.0030286282,0.00091031496,0.0013080612,0.0007783437,0.0005560412,0.00009210248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004257038,0.00045014278,0.4299166,0.00044783077,0.00030651127,0.0009610105,0.092909925,0.00041307736,0.0011098896,0.16999666,0.036246397,0.2668163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018039887,0.0001763562,0.78004867,0.00080435607,0.00018776226,0.0005708606,0.090586685,0.00030406276,0.0004562125,0.011466103,0.11535282,0.000028118082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028499257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053451154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028499257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012042635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047280916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05666673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087088801","doi":"10.1177/000312240406900306","title":"The Social Construction of Market Value: Institutionalization and Learning Perspectives on Stock Market Reactions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Stock market; Corporate governance; Valuation (finance); Nonmarket forces; Market value; Business; Factor market; Capital market; Economics; Financial economics; Market economy; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.022428845165570827,"score_gpt":0.27633572843636084,"score_spread":0.25390688327079003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087088801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6064711,0.0014924834,0.091404796,0.020200692,0.00009649445,0.00009836845,0.00010494701,0.00007815073,0.28005287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997165,0.00020887433,0.0016771404,0.0001307556,0.000036105826,0.000016067368,0.000014136763,0.0000076532415,0.00074416696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715984,0.0017854269,0.000072264906,0.00025293653,0.0004501487,0.00027936176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990081,0.00616262,0.0017804068,0.0007866682,0.00069501065,0.00049424695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044123665,0.0002558893,0.00027173123,0.002048857,0.001582357,0.0051061367,0.00073827483,0.0012254764,0.003616778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010037081,0.00018693185,0.00044149993,0.0011450164,0.01962425,0.0077029257,0.002659153,0.001534584,0.00015717707],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024706826,0.00007101319,0.006116658,0.000032189928,0.000019383308,0.00012426732,0.0118536735,0.0020287808,0.0005159754,0.9651599,0.00032278354,0.013730689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001696993,0.00004925675,0.009183598,0.000036844976,0.000012206536,0.000072888244,0.0072462484,0.0052626007,0.00043827348,0.9693955,0.008261833,0.000023707891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002206454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014506296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051061367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037980368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013207287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027556837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087608299","doi":"10.1177/000312240807300407","title":"Democratization, Women's Movements, and Gender-Equitable States: A Framework for Comparison","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Ideology; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Politics; State (computer science); Gender studies; Political science; Social movement; Variation (astronomy); Sociology; Political economy; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.13913348756067376,"score_gpt":0.42962454904276887,"score_spread":0.29049106148209514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087608299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27748898,0.06546519,0.07794857,0.019861292,0.0007773555,0.00087445526,0.00080968125,0.00009723382,0.5566772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97276545,0.007261394,0.015305593,0.00059660006,0.00008458828,0.00094850955,0.00017928136,0.0000262086,0.002832426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921949,0.0066148457,0.0001565757,0.00026648625,0.00039165787,0.0003755452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968215,0.0023879174,0.00025500354,0.00023865113,0.00021849082,0.000078402285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005758791,0.00054843066,0.00083864003,0.007368678,0.0026897783,0.0047652456,0.0012126393,0.001121793,0.0037718301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007689092,0.00015354408,0.0006852941,0.005447688,0.010947536,0.0038349857,0.0029082347,0.0011495946,0.00014517724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028126215,0.000043498596,0.0030240277,0.00020792452,0.000029987665,0.00012212101,0.008535244,0.00071388256,0.00009184813,0.9604661,0.0010773452,0.025659794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007199716,0.0003626008,0.021126539,0.0015574741,0.00012365618,0.00038890858,0.09627836,0.004673969,0.0006011568,0.71151465,0.1632377,0.00006310285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008121996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010569865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008121996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061561363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023327798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044666052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093505855","doi":"10.1177/0003122413477419","title":"Can Honorific Awards Give Us Clues about the Connection between Socioeconomic Status and Mortality?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Honorific; Socioeconomic status; Longevity; Hierarchy; Argument (complex analysis); Competition (biology); Social hierarchy; Demographic economics; Social status; Relative deprivation; CONTEST; Demography; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Economics; Gerontology; Social science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.05779002800240379,"score_gpt":0.39289336350746706,"score_spread":0.33510333550506327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093505855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5413343,0.25443795,0.004396976,0.13251378,0.0043021836,0.000051109764,0.0025929024,0.0000527022,0.06031819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8648025,0.11920216,0.0019395978,0.0046793036,0.0031434102,0.00002459924,0.0011593924,0.000020591635,0.0050285864],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985672,0.0006150512,0.00013334525,0.000138423,0.00035862174,0.00018723115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990781,0.0042877784,0.0022037907,0.0005128073,0.0016401119,0.00057446596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050981226,0.00048067895,0.00084093784,0.0048481696,0.0005072126,0.0020768226,0.0008382905,0.0013004619,0.0062807202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024770292,0.0002768098,0.00064631074,0.003511368,0.0016718857,0.006014769,0.0013012078,0.0021558478,0.0010877568],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034339246,0.00023127906,0.6718985,0.0012394219,0.000521095,0.00033478087,0.0039644805,0.00031166492,0.0003767179,0.02912478,0.017338496,0.2743155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031373733,0.00048570978,0.8695808,0.0016887326,0.00035957317,0.000660483,0.011663473,0.0005634896,0.0002530017,0.051185943,0.0634364,0.000090991445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057851183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0145759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062807202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005965272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069982884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026961744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099393405","doi":"10.1177/0003122412443365","title":"Resolving the Democracy Paradox","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":177,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Democracy; Legislature; Politics; Representation (politics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Development economics; Economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.09692534005713933,"score_gpt":0.42775994984721005,"score_spread":0.33083460979007073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099393405","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098079905,0.09644091,0.015208379,0.657236,0.0033243243,0.00003205223,0.00016544983,0.000050904982,0.12946205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8933708,0.034114152,0.0022656317,0.05480615,0.0032235975,0.000071051225,0.0000798433,0.000055821,0.012012873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928128,0.005157115,0.000130598,0.0006078456,0.0008690461,0.00042257016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906819,0.006603874,0.000816055,0.00067465036,0.0007886552,0.00043488017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011228482,0.0002153589,0.00060390536,0.00094529387,0.0014756143,0.0026466665,0.0007579539,0.002311181,0.0038828717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021266663,0.00012870546,0.00035627672,0.0011023743,0.0059829354,0.0070624677,0.0037586815,0.0038755068,0.0004653417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052027677,0.00005653581,0.0029381851,0.00032596115,0.00006999293,0.00016951292,0.0047270176,0.0004838539,0.00023288542,0.8607523,0.02914618,0.10104554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046860576,0.0000817164,0.0049797553,0.0005918743,0.000026508995,0.00019270343,0.005184933,0.0005258188,0.00026709342,0.7251323,0.26295143,0.000019120243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015008064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017294753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011228482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017354427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003181832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059382617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108976036","doi":"10.1177/000312240607100206","title":"Infant Mortality, Social Networks, and Subsequent Fertility","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Demography; Macro; Population; Infant mortality; Linkage (software); Social network (sociolinguistics); Social learning; Demographic economics; Geography; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06954472912589711,"score_gpt":0.4116705918219727,"score_spread":0.3421258626960756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108976036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.987082,0.0029602048,0.00022811144,0.00064989534,0.000009520356,0.000008734371,0.00022307623,0.0000028512925,0.008835564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795085,0.0012252145,0.000117316704,0.000026070365,0.00001056367,0.0000050697804,0.000055727578,5.810916e-7,0.00060850225],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996131,0.0002092977,0.000012262537,0.000038690378,0.00006582007,0.00006086189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985446,0.00055114075,0.0005584717,0.00004911472,0.00008920377,0.00020753816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009834307,0.00009573143,0.0001330262,0.000778666,0.0003426072,0.00052567077,0.0002707062,0.00026114724,0.0023449745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041555865,0.000062298095,0.00013501685,0.0006418524,0.00033372326,0.00036412323,0.00050781755,0.00042902847,0.0002053381],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051323623,0.00014937573,0.97411126,0.000050926945,0.00007369108,0.000101782076,0.0011696632,0.00024326233,0.00016086634,0.0031443192,0.00031287587,0.020430569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012928833,0.00006585472,0.9958858,0.000027797423,0.000024603441,0.000115759096,0.0013035034,0.00021589863,0.0000826957,0.0010189109,0.0012537367,0.000004075793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058646714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013304206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058646714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044771453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003049893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011661112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131234948","doi":"10.1177/0003122414548194","title":"Varieties of Capitalism and Job Quality","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"German; Capitalism; Quality (philosophy); Dimension (graph theory); Political science; Demographic economics; European Social Survey; Sociology; Economics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.06521015101240381,"score_gpt":0.4421991319557683,"score_spread":0.3769889809433645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131234948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792572,0.0008245648,0.00033907735,0.00046321633,0.000008715637,0.0000097553175,0.00006692833,0.0000040345826,0.019026421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996697,0.00009510091,0.000040090352,0.000012530887,0.0000047783387,0.000001577151,0.000013867042,4.0716475e-7,0.00016193834],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990576,0.00032932175,0.00005015419,0.00009725787,0.00021360187,0.0002520792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996027,0.0009300673,0.0016901027,0.00027075873,0.00016910813,0.000913069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095984794,0.00009714208,0.00015287354,0.0011688225,0.0008165412,0.0018305478,0.0002533406,0.000239956,0.0023445329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031581693,0.00007361148,0.00016138291,0.0013126964,0.0025196834,0.0007065076,0.001553537,0.0004088959,0.000108606546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019651334,0.00027040538,0.8663117,0.00015530459,0.00016929074,0.00031071718,0.009635966,0.0011153872,0.001266267,0.07305819,0.00077134167,0.04673894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000782446,0.00004509125,0.98505276,0.000048861162,0.000011075237,0.00010059563,0.0037759214,0.00014220474,0.00010961653,0.007612891,0.003083746,0.000009502452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028780499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005039706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028780499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010467027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041974615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007843196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132692129","doi":"10.1177/0003122413480362","title":"Only 15 Minutes? The Social Stratification of Fame in Printed Media","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ephemeral key; Scholarship; Social stratification; Hierarchy; Entertainment; Sociology; Social hierarchy; Social media; Stratification (seeds); Media studies; Social science; Art; Computer science; Visual arts; World Wide Web; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05942096949907605,"score_gpt":0.3686902491852038,"score_spread":0.3092692796861278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132692129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8948549,0.0071913544,0.0018623564,0.010360222,0.00017479816,0.000025913847,0.00062049215,0.000066219596,0.0848437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943146,0.0013535075,0.00041421925,0.0003514151,0.00013669972,0.0000100185625,0.00011630435,0.000013160514,0.0032901352],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893695,0.000511914,0.00005701114,0.00016443191,0.00020158495,0.0001281143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934174,0.0030209515,0.00195302,0.0006300396,0.00051759375,0.0004609545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016889506,0.000096914846,0.00024216356,0.0021825565,0.0021468152,0.0033426972,0.00029194428,0.0005786672,0.0049786093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012589708,0.00015724092,0.0001325429,0.003001301,0.0033683456,0.0059277187,0.0015253345,0.00052156346,0.0006558373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043237692,0.00011290915,0.2984397,0.00051200704,0.00008287407,0.0015222295,0.24151035,0.0002756345,0.002238319,0.11949029,0.019127455,0.3162558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027063279,0.00013286997,0.6145983,0.0005988325,0.000047006535,0.001526509,0.11711219,0.00039209583,0.0007253279,0.033424154,0.23136051,0.000055155415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004911783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065510627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049786093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011867146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005156175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016655087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147046775","doi":"10.1177/0003122410368929","title":"Stained Red","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":181,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Moral panic; Harm; Stigma (botany); Association (psychology); Wrongdoing; Spillover effect; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Psychiatry; Economics","score_opus":0.03023266932009205,"score_gpt":0.3977172744957033,"score_spread":0.36748460517561127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147046775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03317437,0.015386734,0.04355587,0.013088662,0.007387587,0.00047860402,0.0032460757,0.0042649643,0.87941706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1124601,0.008420432,0.046143774,0.0086072935,0.0006939268,0.0004126974,0.0034500759,0.0013091853,0.8185024],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905485,0.00015304826,0.000045583158,0.00028260436,0.00028094853,0.00018298744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987828,0.00020241084,0.00012459935,0.000242279,0.00047587423,0.00017207062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010017104,0.000629942,0.0006075476,0.0023163094,0.0020860594,0.0028693106,0.0012640258,0.00231803,0.26617238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017454795,0.0006775299,0.00068564655,0.0012944395,0.0011784851,0.002277427,0.0014835777,0.0025234902,0.09128553],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080895337,0.00026909032,0.0047599133,0.0014297039,0.00013000697,0.0024913156,0.0013977999,0.00072784355,0.18549877,0.10905307,0.35417032,0.3392631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037845493,0.000093781215,0.0037907863,0.00025552863,0.00004590613,0.0024101713,0.00076388934,0.00064181164,0.02511024,0.009687113,0.9571202,0.000042748186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024208252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004527106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26617238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009694618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000864152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89043534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147339182","doi":"10.1177/0003122414564998","title":"Contact Theory in a Small-Town Settler-Colonial Context","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Prejudice (legal term); Racism; Contact hypothesis; Sociology; Hostility; Social psychology; Colonialism; Ideology; Context (archaeology); Gender studies; Friendship; White (mutation); Politics; Psychology; Geography; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12071235649993009,"score_gpt":0.41704165814616967,"score_spread":0.2963293016462396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147339182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31664243,0.14948256,0.029480474,0.017057864,0.00067774596,0.00008851668,0.0000627012,0.00003880025,0.48646894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713433,0.020338781,0.0010753926,0.00044816936,0.0002225947,0.000029211773,0.000027170727,0.0000073428337,0.006508093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890137,0.0005713165,0.000032867523,0.00015188806,0.00019974489,0.00014286864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999223,0.00046896026,0.000101844205,0.00003546898,0.00008069404,0.00009005265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001059856,0.0002506356,0.00035553557,0.0013496085,0.0023206142,0.0021569477,0.00080209353,0.0011935282,0.0037468495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014297066,0.00011278932,0.0002180507,0.0015056983,0.008906462,0.0026397037,0.0018891556,0.0010333675,0.0002608648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020405283,0.000038505234,0.004406913,0.00040630513,0.000021468579,0.0010114028,0.030435363,0.00040384146,0.00032130026,0.9192609,0.0015888567,0.04208482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033948974,0.00013587932,0.045792587,0.0012181719,0.00006713056,0.0024873326,0.07034747,0.0022537278,0.0002549862,0.5807164,0.29665646,0.00003588778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009688738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007875108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009688738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031042607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012288252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022523046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160375947","doi":"10.1177/0003122413514584","title":"Unmasking the Conflicting Trends in Job Tenure by Gender in the United States, 1983–2008","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Parallels; Demographic economics; Marital status; Childbirth; Labour economics; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Demography; Population; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.13930667440588548,"score_gpt":0.4714916493966366,"score_spread":0.33218497499075117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160375947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9317945,0.052426133,0.00012260184,0.0064366506,0.00021608431,0.000009162163,0.002351392,0.0000062163444,0.0066372748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746456,0.021370932,0.00010633185,0.0007686821,0.00020040541,0.000012307138,0.0012345226,0.0000046473433,0.0016564879],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996158,0.0001074254,0.00004137225,0.000053237683,0.000068238754,0.000113920745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834013,0.00037361972,0.0005693607,0.00006203246,0.0004883236,0.00016649134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017240109,0.000083552746,0.00017576753,0.0013609403,0.0005860117,0.0005174672,0.00037232167,0.00034875635,0.0012480143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022994853,0.00013007598,0.00020514769,0.0024945235,0.0003913351,0.00046463273,0.0005784417,0.0004909238,0.0001683401],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027165664,0.00007322767,0.87790215,0.00060099567,0.00011060191,0.00016526837,0.005059701,0.000093904855,0.00045531208,0.001102209,0.0145245865,0.09964037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015479301,0.000016707236,0.992919,0.00009247557,0.000012534534,0.000026385413,0.0016044908,0.000015821037,0.000043077336,0.000034701432,0.005231486,0.0000017329102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083004296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27052084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083004296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010719284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013946175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16504234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2205882371","doi":"10.1177/0003122415619617","title":"Childhood Disadvantage and Health Problems in Middle and Later Life","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":293,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Disadvantage; Psychology; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Environmental health; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.21989723952351975,"score_gpt":0.47048004084664513,"score_spread":0.2505828013231254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2205882371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6672845,0.31256175,0.0005016436,0.0034116476,0.00018453591,0.000043287557,0.00071315916,0.000007217868,0.015292249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86866426,0.129098,0.00031461965,0.0004120865,0.0002666094,0.000031042367,0.00029803556,0.0000022817187,0.0009131612],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956805,0.00013447781,0.000032892818,0.000048301932,0.00009972541,0.000116576586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910337,0.00024220752,0.00036294764,0.00003100874,0.000091837224,0.00016865278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082662184,0.00016332681,0.00040021352,0.002944911,0.00044508092,0.0008344408,0.00031159434,0.0005321646,0.0015429966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020893777,0.00011478091,0.00047148456,0.0026156574,0.00048251456,0.00053289963,0.00085502554,0.00044345472,0.00014225839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000873367,0.00016243952,0.8942116,0.0007913398,0.00039753056,0.00048407086,0.0017051861,0.00023527675,0.0003469298,0.0038382243,0.0014275176,0.0963125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014104271,0.000038634684,0.995069,0.00022850107,0.0000319213,0.00020573758,0.0005099781,0.000025922544,0.0000199875,0.0005071493,0.0033574256,0.0000043337445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02193476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030149858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02193476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007351215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067983416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04361415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2223863017","doi":"10.1177/0003122415596999","title":"A Paper Ceiling","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Newspaper; Representation (politics); Inequality; Media coverage; Gender inequality; Demographic economics; Glass ceiling; Ceiling (cloud); Mass media; Occupational segregation; Political science; Sociology; Advertising; Politics; Media studies; Geography; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.18778640098463958,"score_gpt":0.45648880604820985,"score_spread":0.26870240506357024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2223863017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004650455,0.036234416,0.0025075388,0.031620298,0.020461963,0.00015797505,0.0016541103,0.00028348406,0.90242964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061315037,0.027795851,0.002486298,0.014418307,0.005154757,0.00021661674,0.0021961424,0.00023467261,0.8861823],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978052,0.0005751504,0.00014526382,0.00053690374,0.00067295367,0.00026457044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767643,0.00048884185,0.00016032305,0.00044638058,0.0008679356,0.00036001494],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001817789,0.0005198657,0.00050928927,0.0014267599,0.0026535366,0.0069110016,0.0012695579,0.0028782617,0.2149289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070094485,0.0002655995,0.00067676615,0.0019781196,0.0017414769,0.0042396863,0.0028212187,0.0025570346,0.078721575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001259879,0.00007374442,0.0016397389,0.00064452214,0.000036203222,0.00038323557,0.0012878691,0.00015241819,0.00049190596,0.29267502,0.49513307,0.20735617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062428808,0.0000125598235,0.00056588324,0.00021541718,0.0000050469002,0.0001220968,0.0002517661,0.000028162936,0.00008838773,0.0063468283,0.9923534,0.000004230288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004880897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048416285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99857324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002885063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045157326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7190088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235597883","doi":"10.1177/0003122415613414","title":"Altared States","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Politics; Political science; Institutionalism; Public policy; Law; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.17758165821256008,"score_gpt":0.4580257571533388,"score_spread":0.2804440989407787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235597883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023598103,0.0058946637,0.0008129641,0.0022779105,0.0005066416,0.00009166471,0.0046233274,0.00011528832,0.9620794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30399358,0.012020566,0.0024263063,0.004573357,0.0002259655,0.00035088471,0.008920675,0.000083050836,0.6674056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996159,0.000086722976,0.000020775595,0.00006952667,0.00009882167,0.00010826105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997124,0.000052228308,0.000056710167,0.0000336578,0.000120131925,0.00002477408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000470203,0.00019088668,0.0001834346,0.00111591,0.0019042831,0.0015802515,0.0003854072,0.0005421405,0.08106643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093627744,0.000118149714,0.0002087897,0.0024458205,0.00033953186,0.0008887266,0.0009671873,0.00087211945,0.008126692],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085652384,0.0000725661,0.010132601,0.00047042192,0.000027691689,0.0005262806,0.002811376,0.00029049662,0.00050184195,0.6444127,0.15766504,0.1830033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046817345,0.000016410762,0.0068117576,0.00010229873,0.000008791809,0.000082498074,0.00062674924,0.000046098743,0.00013722281,0.00269156,0.98946744,0.0000044144713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04363589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067452416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08106643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019268319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002402869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27119422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338947170","doi":"10.1177/0003122415591800","title":"The (Re)genesis of Values","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Action (physics); Dual (grammatical number); Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Cognition; Focus (optics); Discipline; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Social science","score_opus":0.2990129166487381,"score_gpt":0.4743115732246847,"score_spread":0.17529865657594662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338947170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37464026,0.0063460856,0.05686494,0.024385193,0.00042535263,0.00007521659,0.00017138255,0.000056640067,0.53703487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917365,0.000879697,0.004030351,0.00040734265,0.000042269592,0.000020207613,0.000020924765,0.0000147221435,0.0028478517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745184,0.0014189739,0.000079898855,0.00034527548,0.00044845766,0.00025548693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967847,0.00129963,0.00040215856,0.0005928062,0.00053818634,0.00038255905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00285791,0.00024903586,0.00029360983,0.0011872121,0.001431062,0.005418909,0.00063438574,0.0010796644,0.0019879786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006605263,0.00022726231,0.00022147784,0.0010363158,0.021465007,0.005886401,0.002315255,0.0028851249,0.00022813899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009049902,0.000016593647,0.0033970277,0.000040118943,0.000008623182,0.000070645954,0.008524564,0.00017009079,0.00024294657,0.96837413,0.0006693164,0.018476835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007671575,0.000030140855,0.012356241,0.00018019593,0.000010156597,0.0002375945,0.009469762,0.0007912249,0.00045758748,0.9257391,0.050698128,0.000022229982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024335808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023421394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005418909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023619684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021148005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017137349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343133767","doi":"10.1177/0003122416643758","title":"Why Is There No Labor Party in the United States? Political Articulation and the Canadian Comparison, 1932 to 1948","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political economy; Political science; Mainstream; Unrest; Rhetorical question; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.045982595679793216,"score_gpt":0.36556741248436014,"score_spread":0.3195848168045669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343133767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.613256,0.03936368,0.00021061089,0.022569155,0.0003177565,0.000050524537,0.0013822116,0.00001790061,0.3228322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98061,0.00931837,0.00011334318,0.00093667535,0.00003495935,0.000010587697,0.00030084798,0.000009632434,0.008665484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976687,0.00017264867,0.00004164076,0.0002103818,0.0006411587,0.0012654772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978886,0.00023964731,0.0001686583,0.00006940482,0.0011890479,0.00044451823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019111297,0.00021052887,0.00037551142,0.0041341134,0.016583687,0.0048289634,0.0011669697,0.0010308694,0.004034409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039722794,0.00018367262,0.00030630673,0.01141567,0.0060936534,0.0014040767,0.0017264105,0.0015735084,0.0001929339],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005205385,0.00009569435,0.11033324,0.00063317607,0.00014459781,0.0009205762,0.15966292,0.0008917946,0.00071238796,0.44803038,0.047894884,0.23015977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034366847,0.00004449513,0.48951516,0.00088687544,0.000117524905,0.00015868034,0.12626185,0.00036592633,0.0004349917,0.006429506,0.3756598,0.00009081032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99772733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12493459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12493459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08666928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90646815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2401807756","doi":"10.1177/0003122416668154","title":"Class Advantage, Commitment Penalty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":351,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Elite; Social class; Audit; Psychology; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Labour economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Accounting; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.17985695867541154,"score_gpt":0.40439910643493654,"score_spread":0.224542147759525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2401807756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72880465,0.040885985,0.006231445,0.019139016,0.0007399317,0.00017383556,0.00064700935,0.00006453883,0.20331353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98637193,0.00541667,0.0007426675,0.0013916687,0.00027570035,0.00006394505,0.000091772104,0.0000113039605,0.005634326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869955,0.00047470073,0.000045710185,0.00019135815,0.00035741884,0.00023122253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955974,0.001959995,0.0011201074,0.00041200413,0.00034082317,0.0005695686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001976452,0.000220447,0.0003272029,0.000948352,0.00094618765,0.0010615203,0.00064053765,0.00095759495,0.011333901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008392456,0.00012370726,0.00029552347,0.00072412187,0.0022609432,0.0013258177,0.0015408905,0.0011449782,0.00047908595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004592177,0.001059774,0.13925466,0.0007992468,0.00022110179,0.0009944278,0.0026260458,0.0012998611,0.002600125,0.4378904,0.013229352,0.39956573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021074523,0.00091263175,0.64373547,0.0010341211,0.00022931486,0.00260798,0.004346859,0.0015253862,0.001525766,0.18575019,0.1580465,0.000075086864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021821992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030852142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011333901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010835769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008565089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037915707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464393218","doi":"10.1177/0003122416650963","title":"Modeling Dynamic Identities and Uncertainty in Social Interactions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social Power and Status Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Generalization; Social identity theory; Social psychology; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Perception; Social learning; Social identity approach; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Social group","score_opus":0.047985901157797155,"score_gpt":0.4153927610026215,"score_spread":0.36740685984482435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2464393218","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12488642,0.00050906965,0.85260653,0.002884454,0.000079805824,0.00011734333,0.00019501877,0.00013912359,0.01858228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946934,0.0005001475,0.047300376,0.00014241946,0.00009843643,0.00025376424,0.0000993126,0.000038327435,0.004633222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725014,0.0015163345,0.00008513384,0.0004789535,0.00043519307,0.00023418272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886889,0.0087242145,0.0012119658,0.0005282748,0.0004439874,0.00040264108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050830725,0.0007630101,0.0011632533,0.0016542964,0.0014936435,0.0039626504,0.00220477,0.002321892,0.003703579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023804637,0.0007880248,0.0009975448,0.0013329587,0.0042724474,0.0057908255,0.0027360013,0.002103385,0.00047660334],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043702476,0.000047608275,0.0047467733,0.00004845688,0.00005477667,0.00021495526,0.0012663985,0.31603673,0.00037797453,0.6662105,0.00062585715,0.010326285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014935929,0.000015324913,0.00079037226,0.000014267712,0.000013732749,0.00003958501,0.00014028941,0.6478908,0.000054052605,0.34993225,0.001073971,0.000020332223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013610614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00833607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013610614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027367105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014201115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027062774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616930902","doi":"10.1177/0003122417703087","title":"The Effects of Gendered Occupational Roles on Men’s and Women’s Workplace Authority: Evidence from Microfinance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation","keywords":"Microfinance; Compliance (psychology); Variety (cybernetics); Demographic economics; Business; Political science; Gender studies; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.12378836177421283,"score_gpt":0.38280325524023895,"score_spread":0.25901489346602613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616930902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93834186,0.048148863,0.0003029348,0.0013979811,0.00006229006,0.000009879556,0.00013399936,0.0000014107202,0.011600772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857606,0.0133260805,0.0000736168,0.00020569518,0.000042662243,0.000007462759,0.00006229588,0.0000021976637,0.0005193193],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976369,0.0012233359,0.00010995983,0.00031494364,0.00044016956,0.00027467305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98896295,0.006694462,0.0027243127,0.0003421046,0.00077635125,0.0004998814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043224692,0.00020740021,0.00045945216,0.0014681296,0.0010285674,0.00090008683,0.0005752027,0.00041322806,0.0033548402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009794118,0.0001797102,0.000319893,0.00202117,0.0029690035,0.0011032684,0.0015409697,0.0004906165,0.00018278528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006470226,0.00022889567,0.7658964,0.0014543821,0.0004820321,0.0006124351,0.04796659,0.00019698779,0.0007662429,0.0134375,0.002186469,0.16612504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011638962,0.00014175508,0.97643125,0.000540817,0.00008835059,0.00020622784,0.013550103,0.00004712445,0.00016644345,0.0013302455,0.0074702245,0.000015841024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017219666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03069633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017219666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081635104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082859694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034238875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618736107","doi":"10.1177/0003122417701115","title":"The Hazards of Expert Control: Chief Risk Officers and Risky Derivatives","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Desk; Control (management); Business; Risk management; Compliance (psychology); Finance; Actuarial science; Economics; Management; Law; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02419467676525442,"score_gpt":0.2858627539920536,"score_spread":0.26166807722679913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618736107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47550994,0.3063043,0.0043554706,0.11931541,0.0006862299,0.000036026187,0.00012516837,0.000027490572,0.09363996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94406295,0.048041046,0.00026279496,0.0048953868,0.0007554393,0.0000108638515,0.000031046675,0.0000052459154,0.0019352484],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574006,0.0023172188,0.00016146046,0.0002826122,0.0011025927,0.0003960608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722198,0.014515023,0.008496486,0.00078210357,0.002770543,0.0012160682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006725872,0.00011717829,0.0002485472,0.0019497074,0.0008690713,0.0017560106,0.0003850029,0.0013838401,0.0024752568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01883895,0.00015176363,0.00021759006,0.0014026306,0.0041817576,0.0023921349,0.00091605395,0.0013620782,0.00026077626],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026285724,0.00021607039,0.25955543,0.0014673029,0.00017889732,0.0013505353,0.012045198,0.0013424314,0.0006823537,0.28847474,0.05104114,0.38338318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015387706,0.00036156506,0.623177,0.00320028,0.00020388376,0.0020332723,0.014403259,0.0016208814,0.00096902787,0.09943634,0.25434208,0.000098484226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063877334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00740108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006725872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015387125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019964078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035570264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620580712","doi":"10.1177/0003122417710462","title":"Where “Old Heads” Prevail: Inmate Hierarchy in a Men’s Prison Unit","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Prison; Exponential random graph models; Criminology; Unit (ring theory); Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Hierarchy; Narrative; Political science; Graph; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.07568654684257914,"score_gpt":0.42148349133043045,"score_spread":0.3457969444878513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620580712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97598743,0.014316201,0.00038247064,0.0038026392,0.00006619231,0.000021167558,0.000026222984,0.0000061838664,0.005391528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99359137,0.0053947205,0.00018823822,0.0001686996,0.00003305245,0.000012866433,0.000011368977,0.0000028051206,0.00059681316],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972813,0.0020419837,0.000101389836,0.00013388196,0.00017855328,0.00026281225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974585,0.0011088346,0.0008404309,0.00008116667,0.00021841121,0.00029269911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027281477,0.0001533745,0.00024249396,0.0011777877,0.003306864,0.0015930254,0.00074496015,0.0005867553,0.0010541902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005364703,0.00019263482,0.00019660998,0.0012111749,0.003821362,0.002389601,0.0024873812,0.0006732075,0.000082793485],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009588238,0.00010740458,0.117252834,0.0012418543,0.000072338895,0.0021551028,0.7377622,0.00014256693,0.0007309789,0.015073583,0.004043702,0.12132156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004524849,0.00016414447,0.17782381,0.0012986345,0.00007423881,0.0012288122,0.79080194,0.0001234071,0.00038426957,0.0013450234,0.026724866,0.000026241056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021813024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07532258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021813024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00230269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022752557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043372154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799404671","doi":"10.1177/0003122418772567","title":"A Systematic Assessment of “Axial Age” Proposals Using Global Comparative Historical Evidence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"George Brown College","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Directorate for Biological Sciences; H2020 European Research Council; University of Oxford; Baylor University; University of Exeter; Templeton World Charity Foundation; Royal Society; University of Chicago; Harvard University; State University of New York; University of Minnesota; Princeton University; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; University of Cambridge; Yale University; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Ideology; Modernity; China; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Economic geography; Political science; Politics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.22215910275954476,"score_gpt":0.5079190353741354,"score_spread":0.28575993261459065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799404671","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2458808,0.56663674,0.058876373,0.012156642,0.0015641773,0.0042785746,0.003869728,0.00008998022,0.10664706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8109196,0.14744665,0.03383899,0.0021797249,0.000354629,0.0024730053,0.0017305415,0.00005468478,0.0010022619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96246904,0.022209346,0.004997701,0.0041251546,0.005327262,0.0008714246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7190332,0.21959174,0.0257709,0.013468911,0.02105626,0.0010789719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10478495,0.0012227154,0.0016824739,0.034588683,0.0022925602,0.0058854725,0.0024596083,0.0021661536,0.005960831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17921583,0.0007179316,0.0012210028,0.026597416,0.007143104,0.0113502955,0.005030442,0.0017518554,0.000501602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004864912,0.00012611608,0.08359291,0.06719073,0.004463062,0.0008372579,0.028549755,0.0013081694,0.0015515479,0.40796182,0.0075433576,0.39638877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017111676,0.0008522718,0.1745553,0.1987202,0.008504604,0.0022134634,0.102582835,0.0033938282,0.00374257,0.16232084,0.34269542,0.0002475441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023560028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056777713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10478495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049024946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006134166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5541624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801576063","doi":"10.1177/0003122418761857","title":"The Structure of Deference: Modeling Occupational Status Using Affect Control Theory","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Office of Naval Research Global","keywords":"Deference; Operationalization; Occupational prestige; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Psychology; Prestige; Construct (python library); Meritocracy; Job satisfaction; Position (finance); Sociology; Socioeconomic status; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.06759238402009547,"score_gpt":0.41292527573981297,"score_spread":0.3453328917197175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801576063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6371804,0.005985972,0.25075027,0.0050654924,0.00018621303,0.00019917135,0.00022392551,0.00012263947,0.10028588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99081856,0.0009066618,0.005933628,0.00006581291,0.000033753066,0.0000625383,0.000043044667,0.000007773667,0.0021280488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952185,0.00024732595,0.000015845255,0.00008181934,0.000071627415,0.00006155937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845636,0.00092347956,0.00025104056,0.00006607377,0.00015761582,0.00014546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015701058,0.00043628158,0.00037082363,0.0013716618,0.0005961305,0.002237376,0.00094413315,0.00069232297,0.0034530181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042062723,0.00028077123,0.0008292932,0.00091090833,0.0019899434,0.0014656829,0.00089579396,0.0008087056,0.00025510832],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095925774,0.0003058213,0.07304187,0.0002059874,0.00023167254,0.00068064005,0.009491696,0.13379458,0.0012352822,0.6954109,0.0025520436,0.082953654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049573766,0.00014411766,0.053212587,0.00018007406,0.00017992816,0.00023795612,0.0021636996,0.60444415,0.0002387048,0.32925597,0.009839323,0.00005391367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012832148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070020948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012832148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021870825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089621486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0255149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904288731","doi":"10.1177/0003122418816109","title":"Encultured Biases: The Role of Products in Pathways to Inequality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intermediary; Inequality; Matching (statistics); Product (mathematics); Sociology; Causal inference; Face (sociological concept); Selection (genetic algorithm); Qualitative property; Social psychology; Economics; Positive economics; Psychology; Marketing; Business; Social science; Econometrics; Computer science","score_opus":0.10424248713226564,"score_gpt":0.38588414841356705,"score_spread":0.2816416612813014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904288731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9021193,0.012619204,0.008913396,0.015965676,0.00014025401,0.000051849664,0.00023746239,0.000022549084,0.059930295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946254,0.003014993,0.0010715595,0.00039891727,0.00006271503,0.000016572754,0.000028954159,0.000007536085,0.00077326567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957377,0.0023248612,0.0001481001,0.00046807007,0.0007914646,0.0005297552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890237,0.0061308257,0.0024772107,0.0009124385,0.00077459513,0.00068127195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004072522,0.00025139475,0.0004607223,0.0022643134,0.0020528173,0.0037191266,0.0009463139,0.00077363703,0.0046066195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013053193,0.00019967239,0.00037855975,0.0026030715,0.010321277,0.003582685,0.004643761,0.001152806,0.00014616763],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017045399,0.00021694027,0.21598084,0.0007162454,0.00023192777,0.0013260946,0.06428463,0.0011155702,0.001119709,0.5904694,0.0019091283,0.12245902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048681373,0.00022142821,0.376824,0.0013327507,0.00016242267,0.001204481,0.071642354,0.0019742083,0.0010718205,0.48524484,0.06019119,0.0000818068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006409762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006567326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006409762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021590916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014524555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02153778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911382576","doi":"10.1177/0003122418820702","title":"Women in the One Percent: Gender Dynamics in Top Income Positions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Elite; Distribution (mathematics); Household income; Economics; Total personal income; Income distribution; Adjusted gross income; Socioeconomic status; Labour economics; Socioeconomics; Demography; Sociology; Inequality; Gross income; Political science; Geography; Population; Public economics","score_opus":0.04850882440256274,"score_gpt":0.27250940424618997,"score_spread":0.22400057984362723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911382576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84418243,0.06659225,0.0004553112,0.01317621,0.00036874757,0.000016006012,0.0005309534,0.000008717012,0.0746694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753597,0.01749867,0.00007158799,0.00091876974,0.00014149639,0.000009338734,0.000144873,0.000006363819,0.0058492115],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994554,0.00016648827,0.000017721139,0.00006564101,0.00011035405,0.00018437713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991054,0.000259118,0.00025912642,0.000023050532,0.00014352663,0.00020973892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009782717,0.00010534908,0.00021676591,0.0010079929,0.0007801225,0.0012584403,0.00027672746,0.0003016893,0.006055544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017307855,0.00008754808,0.0001555985,0.0017173698,0.0010832977,0.0012820093,0.0009665903,0.0005611069,0.0005318193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054303085,0.00027980504,0.40845823,0.00078880804,0.0001492722,0.0010046418,0.047900893,0.00024645467,0.0006994439,0.14808059,0.033963628,0.35788527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027295722,0.00014970213,0.7992175,0.00075661164,0.00004238293,0.00042679612,0.0570176,0.0001536894,0.000261188,0.013988517,0.1279343,0.000024315965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0101809725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021037215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0101809725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000884874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058181374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020257771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920039906","doi":"10.1177/0003122419847165","title":"The Global Increase in the Socioeconomic Achievement Gap, 1964 to 2015","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":301,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Jacobs Foundation; National Academy of Education; Spencer Foundation","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Educational inequality; Academic achievement; Inequality; Psychology; Demographic economics; Educational attainment; Demography; Economic growth; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Economics; Population","score_opus":0.07223707468084947,"score_gpt":0.43501871927249225,"score_spread":0.36278164459164275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920039906","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103943706,0.81399953,0.0010892028,0.023761958,0.0038675293,0.00007030738,0.013172664,0.00008966768,0.040005412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3711699,0.612144,0.0011098848,0.0031505178,0.0017688249,0.00008736328,0.005938253,0.000024651275,0.0046067415],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995634,0.00009246996,0.00007426118,0.00007941302,0.00012304373,0.00006741269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991394,0.00014128281,0.00025242704,0.00003391489,0.00033180052,0.00010117945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012427084,0.00039827742,0.00031055484,0.002297724,0.00031870612,0.0008136003,0.00022004505,0.0004950041,0.0023385466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023310934,0.00011823999,0.0004881879,0.0044971053,0.0006183921,0.0012514032,0.0015958635,0.0007902608,0.0004450945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024752057,0.000051947885,0.13125409,0.00905116,0.00044129606,0.0004935593,0.0028463684,0.0007532422,0.0006019665,0.03214071,0.078549325,0.74356884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012268413,0.0000989329,0.58205104,0.0040660393,0.00018371908,0.0008529972,0.0018218935,0.00014613973,0.00038956234,0.0029536823,0.40739504,0.000028708666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019940238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017574305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019940238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016000378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024959203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039648354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921085129","doi":"10.1177/0003122419833601","title":"Scaling Down Inequality: Rating Scales, Gender Bias, and the Architecture of Evaluation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":202,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Scale (ratio); Rating scale; Psychology; Gender bias; Gender inequality; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Developmental psychology; Mathematics; Geography","score_opus":0.21463274344937525,"score_gpt":0.38961479717809017,"score_spread":0.17498205372871492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921085129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37048125,0.11384055,0.34088534,0.031844936,0.0022962417,0.0014514417,0.000642919,0.00046197374,0.13809536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92091465,0.008115455,0.06606627,0.00166027,0.000516959,0.00094042846,0.00010863179,0.000105738945,0.0015715059],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.79225683,0.16741477,0.007081265,0.005336036,0.026708066,0.0012029806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7177724,0.20458017,0.024134787,0.017944701,0.033919945,0.0016479968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14011708,0.0006671895,0.0011756842,0.006753013,0.0015988621,0.004496042,0.001762388,0.00094525475,0.0024146698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26717237,0.0004583013,0.00081522414,0.0055882847,0.010587604,0.0050683157,0.0033667854,0.0019214684,0.00034418728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042940662,0.0001703782,0.06448479,0.0031432277,0.00051994144,0.00008605641,0.0269605,0.0017479503,0.0014447413,0.15350579,0.0065538795,0.7409534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003163829,0.0012198404,0.42020223,0.011413975,0.00053032074,0.000719382,0.02188343,0.011727965,0.0036705544,0.4224545,0.105428785,0.0004326624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035833658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004682745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14011708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038502247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027456055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7410188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921811651","doi":"10.1177/0003122419833386","title":"Low-Income Black Mothers Parenting Adolescents in the Mass Incarceration Era: The Long Reach of Criminalization","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; College of Humanities and Social Sciences, United Arab Emirates University; National Institutes of Health; North Carolina State University","keywords":"Criminalization; Mass incarceration; Criminology; Punitive damages; Scrutiny; Juvenile delinquency; Vulnerability (computing); Racialization; Birth certificate; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Prison; Race (biology); Gender studies; Law; Population","score_opus":0.06115774622700883,"score_gpt":0.42807814067354494,"score_spread":0.3669203944465361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921811651","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1480532,0.8266253,0.0000911446,0.014125492,0.00050148135,0.00001876951,0.000024882735,0.0000034982206,0.010556364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22812374,0.76772964,0.00014660376,0.0015705085,0.00040339012,0.000023953275,0.000023508757,0.0000026526466,0.0019759815],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993274,0.00037108024,0.00003152227,0.0000389459,0.00009875123,0.0001322562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912876,0.0003438154,0.00023538925,0.000010992191,0.00014590374,0.00013522219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014332816,0.000142599,0.00030832953,0.00058257784,0.0010949585,0.0011225514,0.0003663841,0.0010324154,0.0010395567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020733057,0.00014483406,0.0002047674,0.0006063282,0.0010348043,0.0007065554,0.0008072047,0.0010834566,0.00013951442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014682667,0.0003669221,0.10391762,0.009272861,0.00025251857,0.004676377,0.083680585,0.000273984,0.0017065646,0.02813602,0.023916788,0.743653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042238302,0.00071475696,0.37075895,0.025850205,0.000469838,0.0051191915,0.1713639,0.00008796697,0.00097602437,0.0049698832,0.4195984,0.000048673373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02894703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06945831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02894703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013723857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004477942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057557046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921908988","doi":"10.1177/0003122419832497","title":"Measuring Automatic Cognition: Advancing Dual-Process Research in Sociology","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Duke University","keywords":"Misattribution of memory; Cognition; Dual (grammatical number); Empirical research; Implicit-association test; Psychology; Process (computing); Dual process theory (moral psychology); Social cognition; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Morality; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.22317833368139087,"score_gpt":0.5069527000832538,"score_spread":0.28377436640186293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921908988","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27304274,0.0772192,0.6172963,0.009565198,0.000505935,0.00040697295,0.00012822941,0.00016035893,0.021675033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8584928,0.020158198,0.11917723,0.0008291499,0.00041378554,0.00039388015,0.000056672754,0.000033225097,0.00044505848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9805752,0.012954569,0.00088734995,0.0018480833,0.0033972836,0.0003375404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8225804,0.14607684,0.011866209,0.007983895,0.010084776,0.0014078864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034139562,0.0008270103,0.0016150369,0.010061854,0.0010110495,0.0038195055,0.0015364299,0.0022781303,0.00084659515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08321895,0.00058489986,0.0010475662,0.004171603,0.009325828,0.009246531,0.004170066,0.003087513,0.0001468614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016539879,0.00064137456,0.1473137,0.00332594,0.00044598023,0.00015471077,0.011746136,0.0058403388,0.003048918,0.438627,0.0007064943,0.387984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051556104,0.0004800883,0.12402157,0.0012589463,0.00017714528,0.00040007549,0.0030251672,0.0326126,0.0020342607,0.82231015,0.013440719,0.00018762144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029661665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018979883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034139562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029012193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029352573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18054938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957755297","doi":"10.1177/0003122419856347","title":"Does Immigration Reduce the Support for Welfare Spending? A Cautionary Tale on Spatial Panel Data Analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; York University","keywords":"German; Immigration; Conceptualization; Welfare; Context (archaeology); Unemployment; Panel data; Demographic economics; Welfare state; Economics; Panel analysis; Ethnic group; Diversity (politics); Political science; Development economics; Geography; Econometrics; Economic growth; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.06623592497601985,"score_gpt":0.3899737775444524,"score_spread":0.32373785256843257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957755297","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13900942,0.26690537,0.09437121,0.44969565,0.005326458,0.00037267298,0.005534231,0.00032979043,0.03845529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8362908,0.07389409,0.033761963,0.0444377,0.0049879984,0.00064226595,0.0012518737,0.00024585694,0.004487489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96080756,0.031195967,0.0015847964,0.003465482,0.0022512472,0.00069497316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8657788,0.11147065,0.007022311,0.010213495,0.0050087455,0.0005060236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060353108,0.0007395011,0.002107317,0.0023311425,0.001209046,0.0034898408,0.0033709446,0.002405162,0.004736333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11126405,0.00035114505,0.0033930696,0.004684056,0.004635292,0.004505712,0.0027366464,0.004433984,0.0006317264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007475284,0.00016224029,0.21611075,0.008462042,0.029066635,0.0010313329,0.009444603,0.008732803,0.0006839234,0.40986875,0.06731144,0.248378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003811583,0.0006130496,0.22508784,0.01141555,0.0119586885,0.00039710864,0.017429646,0.016854275,0.0015232045,0.4906421,0.22339109,0.0003064013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02177489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019958371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060353108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014218416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018584464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31918162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033086507","doi":"10.1177/0003122420920647","title":"Elaborating on the Abstract: Group Meaning-Making in a Colombian Microsavings Program","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Islamic Finance and Banking Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Preference; Odds; Financial services; Dissemination; Public relations; Process (computing); Meaning (existential); Marketing; Business; Sociology; Economics; Finance; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.043570819377613375,"score_gpt":0.2977603227844217,"score_spread":0.25418950340680835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033086507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8392222,0.0068623982,0.0026385405,0.013593874,0.00011572773,0.00008145958,0.000058794234,0.000024177363,0.1374028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948732,0.0014346495,0.00057757983,0.00022220213,0.00001568588,0.000017237857,0.000017763346,0.000003615395,0.0028380863],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984132,0.0010892402,0.000035761346,0.00010364589,0.00018352298,0.00017469133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982663,0.0009080713,0.0003269183,0.00010451607,0.0002002303,0.0001939359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021767563,0.00015487173,0.00014919201,0.0007016483,0.0020770738,0.0021622449,0.00041466326,0.0005474579,0.0029098422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002543908,0.00006188881,0.000109895744,0.0007859018,0.0032280872,0.0015676274,0.0013324305,0.0007453788,0.00013612588],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000203766,0.00039000434,0.044036392,0.0013810917,0.000036135232,0.0011792008,0.33068302,0.0010705021,0.0034265558,0.25830886,0.013679605,0.34560487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048235786,0.00019421085,0.16396199,0.0011885142,0.00005265047,0.0003064602,0.38440382,0.0014363698,0.001288003,0.04425583,0.4028165,0.000047375237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015152501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04063788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015152501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034255972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029035416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030128658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080130437","doi":"10.1177/0003122420948510","title":"Exogenous Shocks, the Criminal Elite, and Increasing Gender Inequality in Chicago Organized Crime","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute of Justice; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Organised crime; Inequality; Restructuring; Elite; Hoarding (animal behavior); Criminology; Power (physics); Enforcement; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.11636108749840054,"score_gpt":0.36788645318729285,"score_spread":0.2515253656888923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080130437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96130943,0.011548573,0.0002795056,0.0042358,0.000072165305,0.000014793826,0.00015391652,0.0000045874754,0.022381272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917773,0.0066620335,0.000073071256,0.00030176484,0.00007218436,0.0000110934925,0.00008614491,0.0000030683339,0.0010131795],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964726,0.00010722111,0.000010811518,0.000032772397,0.000067495035,0.00013444334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914944,0.00022351247,0.0003203302,0.000025080155,0.0000993798,0.00018228589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046446687,0.00012697873,0.00014977611,0.00260717,0.0010897507,0.0024622222,0.00036601632,0.0004942123,0.003010714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001130808,0.000102100654,0.00014673319,0.0028755125,0.002840768,0.0009382635,0.00124052,0.0006147845,0.00010206843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113864895,0.00026831002,0.73801917,0.00047077952,0.00011887017,0.00094660366,0.026381368,0.0021467996,0.00041834798,0.13904348,0.012385416,0.079687044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011568145,0.00006640795,0.9266914,0.0004937286,0.00004782063,0.00017081041,0.03697831,0.00084570795,0.00016632263,0.008511679,0.025996726,0.00001946814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045410678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08730331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045410678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030997838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018012056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09029275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102828640","doi":"10.1177/0003122420971805","title":"Hiring and Intra-occupational Gender Segregation in Software Engineering","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subspecialty; Quality assurance; Occupational segregation; Software quality analyst; Software; Competence (human resources); Software quality assurance; Quality (philosophy); Software development; Psychology; Software quality; Computer science; Business; Political science; Marketing; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0593091350481467,"score_gpt":0.3162425071475056,"score_spread":0.2569333720993589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102828640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95412666,0.031147083,0.00067460316,0.0024018898,0.00012907558,0.00001889629,0.00010776073,0.00000383949,0.011390277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98842806,0.009489066,0.00013235358,0.00036930412,0.000068061076,0.000011160578,0.00006104948,0.0000038243647,0.0014371477],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984006,0.00063990045,0.00008661093,0.0002428531,0.0003647267,0.0002652517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689627,0.0012563375,0.0011464212,0.00008714591,0.00030389102,0.00030997786],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022159133,0.00013066297,0.0002431561,0.0015565761,0.0009018866,0.0009898182,0.00033426553,0.00037938132,0.0037167014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00567455,0.00011173467,0.00023896602,0.0018668595,0.0012887205,0.00096028834,0.0012054151,0.00036090508,0.00038925267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018820717,0.0001840284,0.7469863,0.0006557634,0.00009884263,0.00034438,0.018848408,0.000153549,0.0005159464,0.010772832,0.0031448437,0.2181069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008056271,0.00009400137,0.96744484,0.0004248422,0.000031874715,0.0002987514,0.017534858,0.00013238718,0.00012838125,0.0024468927,0.0114424,0.000012741905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077987127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017400846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069297676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009171478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015506625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112405903","doi":"10.1177/0003122420969399","title":"Statistical Discrimination and the Rationalization of Stereotypes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"McGill University; University of Toronto; York University; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete","keywords":"Rationalization (economics); Statistical discrimination; Rationality; Psychology; Social psychology; Reading (process); Employment discrimination; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.0837732883235165,"score_gpt":0.41970707718903616,"score_spread":0.33593378886551967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112405903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32792637,0.04818642,0.055683136,0.16171815,0.0021176382,0.000121735626,0.00010874641,0.000075926066,0.40406185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98296356,0.0068319896,0.0023293206,0.004728655,0.0003827729,0.000031526764,0.000019940975,0.000012863288,0.002699283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97446805,0.01759833,0.0006361641,0.0011783593,0.0051881345,0.00093089824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9608922,0.02722299,0.005266341,0.0027375235,0.003284117,0.00059688045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023352174,0.00028695256,0.0004541481,0.0019694674,0.0018771922,0.0035586755,0.0012170033,0.0026560908,0.0020197683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03449688,0.00024047749,0.0005207207,0.0013429302,0.028367938,0.003932838,0.0021858125,0.0029825014,0.00028633082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031625987,0.000046925532,0.00350973,0.00019869929,0.000021797232,0.00011661406,0.011107009,0.00027378378,0.0003148216,0.9526945,0.0018168414,0.029867744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040822808,0.00006585863,0.011308598,0.0005608537,0.00003033693,0.00034210586,0.0088318745,0.0009656669,0.0010052499,0.91275716,0.064045526,0.000046009587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030070036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022740262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023352174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038984388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038846554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12349957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138838551","doi":"10.1177/0003122421996323","title":"Creative Destruction: The Structural Consequences of Scientific Curation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Expansive; Citation; Bridging (networking); Scholarly communication; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Data science; Computer science; Political science; Library science; Publishing","score_opus":0.650926118561627,"score_gpt":0.6181973579764589,"score_spread":0.03272876058516805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138838551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6030156,0.020427767,0.20397621,0.049518216,0.001468838,0.0010405232,0.0011840985,0.0013991544,0.11796958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97038805,0.0020959051,0.019662082,0.0015942485,0.0008030445,0.0005519629,0.00033860645,0.00035818477,0.004207873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.85754824,0.07118143,0.0100420015,0.01269066,0.044694655,0.0038429212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3744858,0.4362698,0.07810319,0.081380405,0.02681571,0.002945172],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0782296,0.00082834595,0.0013935633,0.014408065,0.007703721,0.019585093,0.0034143508,0.0026572023,0.005066371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39691696,0.0010476835,0.0012217509,0.0132708335,0.02458689,0.017321875,0.014362597,0.0037923832,0.0014849154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009461306,0.0002169065,0.075432785,0.002805432,0.00074314966,0.0017227485,0.08142807,0.0048036156,0.010811342,0.49644202,0.012516349,0.3121315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002237421,0.00034101115,0.065782666,0.0015977422,0.00045222972,0.002861102,0.022618009,0.010658748,0.012477702,0.7183731,0.16434896,0.000264989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015555937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001636328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98559195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006123135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062904563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41372263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164909796","doi":"10.1177/00031224211011981","title":"How Legacies of Geopolitical Trauma Shape Popular Nationalism Today","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Geopolitics; Pride; Argument (complex analysis); Political economy; Political science; Democracy; Sociology; Gender studies; Development economics; Politics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.06587824589119659,"score_gpt":0.37711028887736575,"score_spread":0.31123204298616913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164909796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94343024,0.027352575,0.000390018,0.0033372736,0.00012227279,0.000015731004,0.00014324668,0.0000061524875,0.0252024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989913,0.0092163,0.00006228606,0.000114946284,0.000029881276,0.000004310931,0.000041955696,0.0000019711545,0.00061543006],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995968,0.00016293435,0.000021655036,0.00006046184,0.00006656786,0.00009152008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913543,0.00025515465,0.00030986572,0.000046078694,0.00013256895,0.0001208866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012182079,0.000105995285,0.00022208746,0.0013329155,0.0007526206,0.0020978306,0.00036550115,0.0003544884,0.0021523999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018179916,0.000108963504,0.0002232492,0.0016332982,0.0017898226,0.0016712578,0.00070920226,0.0005676773,0.000118773925],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018271187,0.00016344141,0.56937826,0.00140183,0.00033134987,0.0007648559,0.07668228,0.0008177992,0.001535057,0.10861484,0.0038164645,0.23631117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065412737,0.00006403279,0.9318353,0.0003785974,0.00007519399,0.00019383032,0.033323344,0.0003092695,0.00022778321,0.0068711806,0.026687425,0.00002742667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011874956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02256226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011874956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016635733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014859905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023611665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196760043","doi":"10.1177/00031224211032906","title":"Discipline and Empower: The State Governance of Migrant Domestic Workers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"State (computer science); Corporate governance; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Political science; Migrant workers; Sociology; Punishment (psychology); Economic growth; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.020045606066976505,"score_gpt":0.36013925516320466,"score_spread":0.34009364909622813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196760043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70896965,0.020265214,0.0050801383,0.049257748,0.000221279,0.000040700077,0.000040386734,0.000028523651,0.2160964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99432546,0.0025200096,0.00015681078,0.0005761915,0.000037460595,0.000011445262,0.000004331597,0.000003222293,0.0023651398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844164,0.0010822419,0.000043421533,0.00010557628,0.00011043995,0.0002166516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987576,0.000686877,0.00027063114,0.000083866325,0.000086588705,0.00011449904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028453222,0.00008742043,0.00013644349,0.00066833664,0.0029874938,0.0038867376,0.00043072336,0.0010185644,0.0011822033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034673526,0.0001178695,0.00015408103,0.00092464493,0.010034121,0.0026010654,0.003402213,0.0009783747,0.00007540631],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026950616,0.00003720345,0.015351504,0.00019886043,0.000018304241,0.00037255426,0.25902575,0.00041165564,0.00043421736,0.6476633,0.0037132665,0.07274649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022260292,0.000112086294,0.0635165,0.0014994801,0.00006153584,0.00040255804,0.4065968,0.0008242549,0.00059420225,0.22224389,0.3040818,0.00004463224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006998336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012364513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006998336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023090083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036497286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016753137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200791192","doi":"10.1177/00031224211041094","title":"College and the “Culture War”: Assessing Higher Education’s Influence on Moral Attitudes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Relativism; Morality; Moral disengagement; Politics; Moral relativism; Moral development; Socialization; Social psychology; Moral psychology; Liberal arts education; Sociology; Moral reasoning; Higher education; Social science; Political science; Psychology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.062441036459792224,"score_gpt":0.4420123882401295,"score_spread":0.3795713517803373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200791192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925135,0.0022226176,0.00012278363,0.0005605858,0.000036780508,0.000015643034,0.000049427075,0.0000025563966,0.004476077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99753076,0.0016465064,0.000116166244,0.00014732622,0.000039725823,0.000023131108,0.000066177796,0.0000021421802,0.00042807823],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973084,0.0017709163,0.000105852334,0.0001680104,0.00046336188,0.00018355202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98578185,0.005506479,0.005236001,0.00045700735,0.00092741766,0.0020913498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003767731,0.00025169406,0.00033059492,0.0012751101,0.0006690606,0.0015289446,0.000481495,0.00061004556,0.0030767107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013477542,0.00015171891,0.00046444515,0.0020511514,0.00095726614,0.0006877194,0.001196252,0.0014926718,0.0002749667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014661446,0.00069516816,0.94722474,0.000090629066,0.00020390683,0.000040774834,0.0018178041,0.00007565852,0.00018505244,0.0005521535,0.00052855123,0.048439045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035380585,0.00005342378,0.9982097,0.000031642223,0.000026095611,0.000015982625,0.0009790293,0.00006051705,0.000041945204,0.0001290986,0.00044492996,0.000004141225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005509575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014726552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005509575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009103865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010171928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019925892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203417397","doi":"10.1177/00031224211042329","title":"Next Steps for the Relative Education Hypothesis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bachelor; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics; Political science; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.24306122016919002,"score_gpt":0.45880963548828213,"score_spread":0.2157484153190921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203417397","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023339543,0.06151485,0.056525465,0.7609379,0.0074915406,0.00033088826,0.0010016285,0.00014552206,0.08871263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68912494,0.050751675,0.0808519,0.13231568,0.014473668,0.0019451361,0.0012726793,0.00020195925,0.029062413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945294,0.002570052,0.0002302004,0.0012176821,0.0010894745,0.0003632456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96917063,0.023500033,0.0016087895,0.0019161789,0.0027166312,0.0010877079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01983359,0.0010438483,0.0017359102,0.0019209866,0.001863706,0.0042729876,0.0048150807,0.0053382404,0.030357936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034938633,0.00041761066,0.0011247848,0.0018278011,0.012300844,0.017151395,0.0047446415,0.011809141,0.0031698325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077553595,0.00011089171,0.002272398,0.00047454625,0.00006378181,0.000143716,0.0020143671,0.00026680247,0.00007915775,0.9339241,0.014523373,0.046049345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034446533,0.000046765548,0.0032566828,0.00089366175,0.000030020083,0.00012104983,0.0026306391,0.0006546096,0.00007921822,0.92062306,0.071605206,0.000024574996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045106877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029660815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030357936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002864341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044214544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1048913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322736134","doi":"10.1177/00031224221150433","title":"Not in My Schoolyard: Disability Discrimination in Educational Access","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Canada Research Chairs; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Notre Dame; Northwestern University; Harvard University; McGill University; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Disadvantage; Race (biology); Psychology; Gatekeeping; Inclusion (mineral); Audit; Inequality; Social psychology; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.1484099792978272,"score_gpt":0.49597590393405505,"score_spread":0.3475659246362278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322736134","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075484976,0.7328123,0.0006393259,0.10721213,0.001966875,0.000024566156,0.00007846078,0.000007878585,0.08177349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5774561,0.40006283,0.00034395506,0.011710554,0.0016129162,0.000025460029,0.000072086026,0.000009209482,0.008706883],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733716,0.0015322741,0.00010993612,0.00012383882,0.0005222762,0.00037440445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977896,0.00116878,0.0003148927,0.0000669469,0.00043695286,0.00022279016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029899464,0.00014364603,0.00026462888,0.0016466712,0.0014066624,0.00244291,0.0004076217,0.001299462,0.002717799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050373725,0.00010647201,0.0002460416,0.0018814271,0.004759004,0.0034589532,0.0017826664,0.0018019223,0.0002601996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082837265,0.0001951264,0.028875904,0.0022333611,0.00006656599,0.0003891752,0.027156724,0.00024799167,0.0003977615,0.33024162,0.064817525,0.5452954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030154386,0.00021114861,0.15294372,0.009491246,0.00013338457,0.0009223912,0.040495105,0.00016455316,0.00033566824,0.045393724,0.7498385,0.0000403376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021315558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036497395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021315558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021610137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040222583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042382956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372348656","doi":"10.1177/00031224231169790","title":"Guns versus Climate: How Militarization Amplifies the Effect of Economic Growth on Carbon Emissions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Militarization; Scholarship; Counterfactual thinking; Economics; Moderation; Environmental sociology; Politics; Climate change; Political economy; Sociology; Development economics; Political science; Economic growth; Social science; Ecology","score_opus":0.039739343768019686,"score_gpt":0.27426164461723623,"score_spread":0.23452230084921655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372348656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9439054,0.009207612,0.004233995,0.0118406415,0.00021239428,0.000024408564,0.00019112923,0.000039452654,0.03034491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967423,0.0015543916,0.0002700758,0.00039860103,0.00007839277,0.000009328671,0.000028696782,0.000010821499,0.00090741465],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988771,0.0006340299,0.000029810592,0.0001901142,0.00008965358,0.00017925356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99274796,0.0050189677,0.0012293142,0.00027417444,0.00031512772,0.00041440895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021348686,0.00035662556,0.0004936483,0.00089574704,0.0005427007,0.0019501064,0.0004782551,0.0009615106,0.008684804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00818297,0.00016165273,0.00091969816,0.0010795436,0.002585499,0.0021541407,0.0024081417,0.0012998087,0.00031590697],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001756011,0.00071077596,0.59610534,0.0016545543,0.002718438,0.0015714157,0.008259497,0.021763582,0.0041216295,0.2672129,0.0059130667,0.08821282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021535654,0.00085994095,0.77300906,0.00067436055,0.0026064508,0.0002590047,0.008997329,0.020241192,0.0028866685,0.14727613,0.042848673,0.0001257764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007322883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006683927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008684804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001128902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00112142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029053569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385252406","doi":"10.1177/00031224231184264","title":"Taking the Time: The Implications of Workplace Assessment for Organizational Gender Inequality","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Workload; Task (project management); Inequality; Gender inequality; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Applied psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.267218071661934,"score_gpt":0.44715207045088806,"score_spread":0.17993399878895405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385252406","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08869887,0.8109687,0.0025009888,0.072885245,0.0016569296,0.000026748821,0.00008213092,0.000010069596,0.023170419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75251585,0.2356505,0.0011145431,0.007883312,0.00130354,0.00005587893,0.000039101105,0.000011962832,0.0014253524],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570686,0.0029136578,0.0002147529,0.0002709938,0.00059650716,0.00029735776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98820275,0.008552062,0.0013819049,0.00024827398,0.0011396297,0.00047533208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063006193,0.00021659838,0.00040493018,0.0020174752,0.0014952373,0.00208155,0.0006460819,0.0010757482,0.0014077406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015213391,0.00012265763,0.00036287864,0.0018647299,0.0061723315,0.003310391,0.0020183665,0.0013561912,0.000113543174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014280813,0.000106068524,0.06819911,0.005637207,0.00015891186,0.00059191196,0.068118565,0.0004576498,0.0007362748,0.14220257,0.015739344,0.6979096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034541918,0.00032313608,0.41710955,0.029417971,0.00026032995,0.002215196,0.13403763,0.00062899204,0.00064321834,0.09990283,0.31530082,0.00012576206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012337111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017430631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012337111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024090917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041457494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0333212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385886422","doi":"10.1177/000312240006500407","title":"Core Networks and Tie Activation: What Kinds of Routine Networks Allocate Resources in Nonroutine Situations?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Interpersonal ties; Resource (disambiguation); Strong ties; Diversity (politics); Affect (linguistics); Social network (sociolinguistics); Business; Personal network; Core network; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Computer network; Telecommunications; Communication; Social media; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.06097434078276182,"score_gpt":0.35177127088154847,"score_spread":0.29079693009878665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385886422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.964091,0.000644415,0.001975652,0.0007119082,0.000010659627,0.00002691096,0.00003960668,0.000008184134,0.032491535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872786,0.00025864269,0.00032819583,0.00002715425,0.000008491775,0.000013158931,0.000021246626,0.000002395446,0.00061291235],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985921,0.0006387889,0.00004801721,0.00019470391,0.00025885552,0.00026762547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945971,0.0022978405,0.0015472117,0.0004515752,0.00035846094,0.0007478955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015335848,0.00020965708,0.0002300281,0.00148729,0.0013535473,0.0024197511,0.0007147003,0.0006056758,0.0034973694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008037738,0.00021130091,0.00019995263,0.0009733764,0.0022729707,0.0040869866,0.0022971698,0.0005090114,0.00025007373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068960857,0.0005133367,0.5830614,0.00069235323,0.00020808128,0.0006781636,0.07652989,0.001628161,0.00786375,0.11235428,0.0014849635,0.21429612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036801477,0.00030905323,0.87626576,0.00024657315,0.00007735893,0.0007590849,0.052351017,0.0021318472,0.0011521354,0.05476752,0.0118573215,0.000045546894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020866732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005045156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034973694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011212693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005848938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011699855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385886517","doi":"10.1177/000312240306800502","title":"Space Meets Time: Integrating Temporal and Contextual Influences on Mental Health in Early Adulthood","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Life course approach; Mental health; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Bivariate analysis; Developmental psychology; Socioeconomic status; Formative assessment; Social environment; Disadvantage; Everyday life; Social psychology; Demography; Sociology; Geography; Population","score_opus":0.03895020055560708,"score_gpt":0.36521190119478325,"score_spread":0.32626170063917614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385886517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.754957,0.20473723,0.00845685,0.011437094,0.00018501058,0.000033352168,0.00022647638,0.000022660091,0.019944249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96215975,0.035509713,0.0015618785,0.00021279977,0.00007552682,0.00001857095,0.00004248639,0.0000039250995,0.00041530584],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993368,0.00042314795,0.000028476035,0.000058604655,0.00008184023,0.00007115029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985832,0.00079772214,0.0003060029,0.00005251895,0.00014049411,0.000120110955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012695501,0.00019398144,0.00033252372,0.0011506869,0.0004255784,0.0016895022,0.00035884487,0.00036182988,0.0007849793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031374656,0.00020649018,0.00038107208,0.0011874784,0.001305677,0.00198089,0.0012630023,0.00046635035,0.00004136087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027181045,0.00012863433,0.53234106,0.0017214956,0.00075097993,0.00102253,0.029236171,0.0018218774,0.0013212741,0.07299682,0.0017446516,0.35664278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010499411,0.00020475661,0.9128771,0.00093849824,0.00041300085,0.0009415364,0.029312253,0.0009045315,0.00030226394,0.032402825,0.021645876,0.000046982903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013420632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031202441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013420632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010886374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012826816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02668506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385886563","doi":"10.1177/000312240106600601","title":"Nations of Joiners: Explaining Voluntary Association Membership in Democratic Societies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Victoria; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntary association; Democracy; Voluntarism (philosophy); Polity; Turnover; Politics; Multilevel model; Association (psychology); Political science; Demographic economics; Development economics; Economics; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.04732151941889556,"score_gpt":0.36191683860553364,"score_spread":0.3145953191866381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385886563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98801404,0.0029240206,0.0012448041,0.0007464235,0.000030504432,0.000019575074,0.00022282441,0.000008697636,0.006789105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774015,0.0008303751,0.00048478626,0.000018995732,0.000026084059,0.000016714985,0.00021872556,0.000003032299,0.0006611681],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977303,0.0012954021,0.00009560358,0.00026741493,0.0002985779,0.00031276137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893043,0.004967977,0.0036004023,0.00046536268,0.0006496432,0.0010121937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041880766,0.00022517749,0.00034395012,0.002167203,0.0009461535,0.0013550622,0.0006007548,0.0004792317,0.003193225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013237513,0.0001839883,0.00038672148,0.0036433602,0.0008302195,0.0013878542,0.0017563694,0.0006280707,0.00027476047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006751328,0.000080013146,0.96143526,0.00010260565,0.000108238986,0.0001051431,0.0034791378,0.0007696639,0.00007959805,0.007009256,0.00091202237,0.025851615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014554961,0.000058174057,0.97747374,0.000100625766,0.00008216502,0.00025339617,0.0053467285,0.003721093,0.0000734239,0.0068366164,0.006027317,0.0000122675565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010602694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018300012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010602694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080815016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006596508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022148907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385886581","doi":"10.1177/000312240106600305","title":"Intellectualization and Art World Development: Film in the United States","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Cinema and Media Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Harvard University","keywords":"Entertainment; Ideology; Art world; Intellectualization; Institutionalisation; Perception; Sociology; Film studies; Aesthetics; Media studies; Political science; Art; Visual arts; Psychology; Movie theater; Art history; Politics; Performance art; Law","score_opus":0.07780125865661522,"score_gpt":0.28974749721197707,"score_spread":0.21194623855536185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385886581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7905373,0.02892522,0.00022831775,0.018652938,0.00020924657,0.000019231444,0.00024588255,0.000007065036,0.16117479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892207,0.008005819,0.000056042114,0.00031500382,0.00007516068,0.0000049842247,0.00005524966,0.0000020988202,0.0022649476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994721,0.0002874785,0.000021289645,0.000040861403,0.00006337441,0.000114876806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819726,0.0008141079,0.0004957721,0.00004711688,0.00017040836,0.00027546915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008809663,0.00015045045,0.00015726853,0.0023156859,0.0025104866,0.0053936485,0.00036365006,0.0007928103,0.0047138836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027127655,0.00010379263,0.0001322461,0.0033924473,0.0029853287,0.002437972,0.0019642734,0.0011297459,0.00011245811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041445167,0.00075136265,0.18625972,0.0007175244,0.00015411293,0.0031227786,0.18621749,0.001188039,0.0008269523,0.35545808,0.03949638,0.22539313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021560669,0.00015668295,0.52966183,0.0010493551,0.00006260636,0.00070464984,0.22911227,0.0009491975,0.0004996894,0.01975381,0.21798922,0.000039074628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039786436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06766417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039786436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037169626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011347374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07910967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385886658","doi":"10.1177/000312240206700403","title":"The Impact of Incarceration on Wage Mobility and Inequality","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":177,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Earnings; National Longitudinal Surveys; Inequality; Demographic economics; Prison; Wage; Quarter (Canadian coin); Argument (complex analysis); Life course approach; Social mobility; Ethnic group; Economics; Survey data collection; Unemployment; Labour economics; Psychology; Sociology; Criminology; Social psychology; Economic growth; Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.16565878573055612,"score_gpt":0.48521003903789345,"score_spread":0.31955125330733736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385886658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95927393,0.012920276,0.0003119658,0.003591451,0.000058503716,0.000016599339,0.00014989339,0.000009343389,0.0236679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99364614,0.005039427,0.00010109543,0.00011291604,0.0000409261,0.000007018331,0.00003932433,0.0000017171985,0.0010114032],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940395,0.0002594299,0.000018352237,0.00003253131,0.000072569,0.00021322728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905854,0.00034360046,0.0002553692,0.000037049296,0.00010644113,0.0001990453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043627262,0.000119144635,0.00019041896,0.0007005352,0.00057703094,0.0006306346,0.00029109602,0.00033888104,0.004122324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002271,0.00006181485,0.00024896345,0.00061262085,0.00061099377,0.0003589571,0.0009329208,0.00038153882,0.00016850069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010903853,0.002256169,0.35570318,0.0010088643,0.0004768688,0.0014241602,0.003537472,0.002080256,0.0021790015,0.030173289,0.006554084,0.59351623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003150474,0.00055760203,0.9742294,0.00035255466,0.00014030572,0.0004921187,0.003472744,0.0004654756,0.00057707547,0.008398353,0.011270372,0.000012492748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006975191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011733233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006975191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007111965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081905356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013869226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388945268","doi":"10.1177/00031224231209445","title":"Trojan Horse Technologies: Smuggling Criminal-Legal Logics into Healthcare Practice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Social and Economic Sciences; Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University; York University; Saint Louis University; Harvard University; Brown University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Trojan horse; Law enforcement; Health care; Guard (computer science); Public relations; Enforcement; Work (physics); Field (mathematics); Criminology; Political science; Law; Business; Psychology; Computer security; Engineering","score_opus":0.06481253435977477,"score_gpt":0.44367150218243173,"score_spread":0.37885896782265693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388945268","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011921721,0.8433575,0.0048182784,0.09016408,0.001960699,0.0000814203,0.000017613445,0.000054412154,0.047624346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13838834,0.83238375,0.004250585,0.020209087,0.0013920745,0.00011721218,0.000021883869,0.000028852593,0.0032082375],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937949,0.004528882,0.00030316674,0.0002667631,0.00072546955,0.00038071602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991017,0.0068480857,0.00081734644,0.00035436123,0.000647193,0.00031599324],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058602584,0.00037647385,0.0003615161,0.0038048194,0.0021101113,0.0050969888,0.0011600803,0.0030082173,0.0026970417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010752576,0.00040316128,0.0006078798,0.0024753707,0.0124431895,0.009295273,0.004130101,0.004299021,0.0004747239],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039838247,0.000114810944,0.0022529508,0.004642922,0.00006023789,0.000575809,0.032621928,0.0003318248,0.00024657312,0.32955667,0.023446731,0.6061097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030511676,0.00018594587,0.0059412783,0.01640849,0.000051453426,0.0017065477,0.030045783,0.0002726976,0.00024783387,0.082680754,0.8623801,0.000048649294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063743945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011556298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038568017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010440337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03099233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389791824","doi":"10.1177/00031224231214288","title":"Tokenism and Its Long-Term Consequences: Evidence from the Literary Field","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; Harvard University","keywords":"Tokenism; Stringer; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Engineering; Anthropology","score_opus":0.13413215634591222,"score_gpt":0.41853879517769943,"score_spread":0.2844066388317872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389791824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9041396,0.049875144,0.000585025,0.008008329,0.0002329451,0.000038522678,0.00012429582,0.000012989402,0.03698316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887729,0.009380011,0.00011032976,0.00036408252,0.00017255804,0.000022815306,0.00005020581,0.000011326797,0.0011157314],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99220806,0.0035210454,0.0006850225,0.0007418339,0.0020667596,0.0007772344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8326187,0.1027492,0.03880444,0.008710627,0.010603284,0.0065136133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014735307,0.00020198514,0.000706941,0.0037297192,0.0038936813,0.006189185,0.0015848058,0.001438321,0.005206959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07363548,0.0002777337,0.0004512678,0.0046702004,0.012754136,0.0067302855,0.0060218917,0.0022299285,0.0006506295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010472389,0.0009485661,0.43073866,0.0035235947,0.0005238974,0.0030067505,0.27330706,0.00045946846,0.0007661881,0.049986918,0.005715479,0.2299762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005385537,0.0006536613,0.7575916,0.0034766286,0.00020535107,0.0029303844,0.1588512,0.00027240175,0.00089282135,0.025311543,0.04965624,0.00010426315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028873617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005368162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014735307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027582285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003438571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07792872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410450760","doi":"10.1177/00031224251333087","title":"Frame Backfire: The Trouble with Civil Rights Appeals in the Contemporary United States","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Civil rights; Frame (networking); Political science; Law; Political economy; Criminology; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.050714674342801705,"score_gpt":0.35649512454922794,"score_spread":0.30578045020642625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410450760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93448204,0.00067189906,0.0013623869,0.022771327,0.00016333081,0.000069102054,0.00003875076,0.000044129294,0.040397096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99499196,0.000169542,0.0003494454,0.0034013223,0.000051164378,0.00004918976,0.000019261184,0.00001545317,0.0009527325],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819276,0.012788027,0.0003657278,0.0012156933,0.002220715,0.0014823134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95087427,0.036302995,0.004393545,0.00353659,0.0031983794,0.0016942169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030960305,0.00025774114,0.00052509236,0.0015113746,0.012865335,0.0089556575,0.0017675218,0.0041563325,0.0056391056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067215085,0.000532956,0.0003962381,0.0013536343,0.012912065,0.0091057345,0.0073628873,0.005721174,0.00037289213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063889846,0.0018388943,0.07200473,0.0002780719,0.000089934896,0.0005756967,0.6724165,0.0005426793,0.0021690854,0.08313682,0.016381886,0.14992678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016325893,0.00074355875,0.08935752,0.0009932168,0.00014690367,0.00020180078,0.78206503,0.0023331575,0.0020472442,0.04296415,0.07880886,0.00017523963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039768822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050882056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039768822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00597621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043412503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16373569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416551133","doi":"10.1177/00031224251391760","title":"Shades of <i>Égalité</i> : Educational Mobility and Ethnoracial Hierarchy Over Three Generations in France","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Graduate Center; European University Institute; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Universiteit Utrecht; Sage Foundation; York University; City University of New York","keywords":"Immigration; Social mobility; Educational attainment; Hierarchy; Ethnic group; Narrative; Life course approach","score_opus":0.0493067725743073,"score_gpt":0.4484102961323243,"score_spread":0.399103523558017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416551133","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2849888,0.6959391,0.00021796276,0.006183225,0.00016078081,0.000011801747,0.00010416928,0.000005379315,0.012388819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6792774,0.31881252,0.0001799426,0.0005042328,0.000126958,0.000016879934,0.00006174058,0.0000027300127,0.0010175221],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996061,0.00021940979,0.000016501464,0.000053393516,0.0000502654,0.00005438812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999559,0.00022995235,0.00010055919,0.0000131833785,0.00004765148,0.000049575836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009784447,0.00015529657,0.00028215858,0.0015668522,0.00079259503,0.0014834915,0.00031251897,0.0004460181,0.0012102661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083025865,0.000069629794,0.00025032274,0.0017471081,0.0014792109,0.0009796129,0.00069943676,0.00046856856,0.00006898881],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027680327,0.00017079915,0.1465202,0.0064996714,0.00047301405,0.0018633693,0.08150467,0.0007194774,0.00081250264,0.06558125,0.008329609,0.68724865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001749658,0.00023630277,0.7890516,0.0075988434,0.0002291448,0.0017016982,0.047864236,0.00023718398,0.00018836143,0.0072843777,0.14554594,0.00004475773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03862883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043990117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03862883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018693659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016611883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076807916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}