{"meta":{"query_hash":"d87fc62dd7b1","filters":{"venue":"American Sociological Review"},"cohort_total":62,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":62,"exported":62,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d87fc62dd7b1","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=American+Sociological+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1965387020","doi":"10.1177/000312240807300108","title":"Job Mobility and Wage Trajectories for Men and Women in the United States","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":185,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; National Longitudinal Surveys; Differential (mechanical device); Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Inequality; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Social mobility; Economics; Labour economics; Work (physics); Survey data collection; Wage growth; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.12363492238520045,"score_gpt":0.44785005935608113,"score_spread":0.32421513697088067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965387020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9609556,0.026300902,0.0000067855694,0.010696876,0.0000141232795,0.0012282282,0.000020864074,0.000029389408,0.0007471859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63630253,0.3523477,0.00004436995,0.0100134155,0.00003604556,0.0011040738,0.00001811921,0.0000047526382,0.00012901182],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810475,0.0009458101,0.00030107202,0.00019602462,0.000072749615,0.00037957673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968803,0.0027873858,0.000113936556,0.00011421503,0.000045260997,0.00005893738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014753658,0.00011756649,0.0005131406,0.000015058931,0.00054868526,0.00000196487,0.00008703248,0.00004072846,0.000038625338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084842864,0.000058097805,0.0000360045,0.00019081858,0.0009984057,0.000025131227,0.00006828821,0.00023800138,0.0000028257657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005047352,0.000066486835,0.91745496,0.0012301013,0.000044571017,0.0000038952467,0.04855183,6.504061e-8,0.000003230922,0.0016702388,0.020203726,0.01072043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002848906,0.0004089563,0.8298052,0.00022024449,0.000019026622,9.953116e-7,0.030820625,0.0000021224182,7.002929e-8,0.002969691,0.13535379,0.00011436805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045878303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016718339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3260468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005030017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024084406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4220099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980513654","doi":"10.1177/000312240707200506","title":"Corporate Demography and Income Inequality","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Labour economics; Inequality; Wage; Economics; Proxy (statistics); Variance (accounting); Economic inequality; Demographic economics; Horizontal and vertical; Variation (astronomy); Wage dispersion; Census; Efficiency wage; Geography; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.06676515257192964,"score_gpt":0.2960416840640138,"score_spread":0.22927653149208418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980513654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9116673,0.07308915,0.0056230696,0.0017569948,0.00009384294,0.0002868691,0.00010333291,0.00006856685,0.0073108934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9003839,0.091251925,0.0013246608,0.0069211256,0.000050113937,0.000012832689,0.000016760652,0.000010175595,0.000028512104],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981929,0.00010547656,0.0008666343,0.00044005792,0.000041387462,0.00035356407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819785,0.00034969722,0.0009298035,0.00030808957,0.000040786013,0.0001737863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045933286,0.00017591009,0.0008651724,0.0000565582,0.00008687614,0.00001984182,0.00019016096,0.000074987176,0.0001546606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074670376,0.00014757787,0.00017190095,0.0005323998,0.0006307974,0.00006659173,0.000107973334,0.00023880354,0.00007706631],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072264565,0.00003593463,0.59218943,0.00017496405,0.000025611951,0.000006926263,0.000019392237,5.0262805e-8,0.0000019522354,0.38752854,0.0000698014,0.019940177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012737168,0.00012707248,0.7270657,0.000093371804,0.00001004537,0.0000033637805,0.000023748235,0.000011791033,4.1933967e-7,0.24707253,0.025183212,0.0002813926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016224863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008336921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14045602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004378181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008249167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6018051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995578715","doi":"10.1177/0003122414564182","title":"Pulling Closer and Moving Apart","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Harvard Business School; University of Chicago","keywords":"Politics; Interpersonal influence; Elite; Voting; Political science; Voting behavior; Identity (music); Interpersonal communication; Normative; Social identity theory; Convergence (economics); Social psychology; Sociology; Identity politics; Political economy; Positive economics; Social group; Psychology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.17816237642066868,"score_gpt":0.4456048628611282,"score_spread":0.26744248644045954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995578715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77503055,0.08821228,0.00038667236,0.057126943,0.00025306028,0.0009529224,0.0000040808372,0.00026932472,0.07776417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846442,0.008732174,0.0002150658,0.0059052133,0.0002582693,0.00003052085,0.0000019227114,0.000003951553,0.00020869877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985334,0.00062011887,0.00019897684,0.00015772623,0.00018379497,0.00030594776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917376,0.00027331253,0.00009149692,0.00007483013,0.000071754286,0.00031486302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012856805,0.00007198297,0.00029334752,0.000007463306,0.00014882395,0.000020857591,0.0000819652,0.000043486707,0.000073102754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001862304,0.000051304796,0.000048642727,0.00016384714,0.00068728987,0.00006395026,0.00002536361,0.000109330926,0.00010326694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012114144,0.00009462266,0.14971118,0.00036460086,0.000039929557,0.000011154036,0.0038727869,0.0000016203771,0.00006534248,0.62202924,0.026111776,0.19768561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012062632,0.0002966565,0.010391729,0.00051396136,0.000056959583,0.0000019108672,0.0013865364,0.000019871366,0.0000031848376,0.026167318,0.9607158,0.00032548964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003226348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010560096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.934604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006381044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000656304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48772946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044815401","doi":"10.1177/0003122411401252","title":"Cultural Anchors and the Organization of Differences","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Northwestern University; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Princeton University","keywords":"Nexus (standard); Sociology; Lesbian; Conversation; Politics; Situated; Context (archaeology); Dichotomy; Dissent; Mechanism (biology); Transgender; Human sexuality; Gender studies; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Communication","score_opus":0.07115952696798843,"score_gpt":0.33158596145068575,"score_spread":0.2604264344826973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044815401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9550997,0.02064979,0.000022501188,0.0058826334,0.000061660845,0.00039173497,0.0000027554818,0.000051340467,0.017837856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7915455,0.20695217,0.00008523735,0.0012611038,0.000039231738,0.000007686736,0.0000016211233,0.0000014944517,0.00010596405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906015,0.00046756488,0.00014830529,0.00009597916,0.000113692004,0.000114285256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942905,0.00020599146,0.00016589227,0.000049611146,0.000107197266,0.000042278174],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034555918,0.000060855193,0.00028211466,0.0000028688044,0.00023836462,0.000006404056,0.0001643606,0.00003337643,0.00022806339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011119256,0.000026525327,0.00005891403,0.00029887893,0.004059727,0.000046463807,0.000032829248,0.000071501076,0.000007437873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011719546,0.000047696052,0.1390634,0.00014669879,0.00005071742,6.871316e-7,0.062501416,7.504191e-9,0.000014322133,0.6431261,0.00074714713,0.1542901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005053078,0.0002595547,0.82991636,0.00058144797,0.0002811708,0.0000022381607,0.11044528,0.0000029849691,0.000004806275,0.042286776,0.015258853,0.00045521458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020435203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006700371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69085294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011684227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002268594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99865067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050440542","doi":"10.1177/000312240507000103","title":"The Discourse of Globalization: Framing and Sensemaking of an Emerging Concept","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":519,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sensemaking; Framing (construction); Globalization; Newspaper; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Media studies; Public relations; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.0436819171830775,"score_gpt":0.43977108515807883,"score_spread":0.3960891679750013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050440542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86872625,0.1133312,0.00021475,0.013351396,0.00012219415,0.00034980843,0.000008888216,0.00003489953,0.0038605875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9173719,0.08096938,0.00042138025,0.0009701991,0.00024153649,0.0000048551656,0.0000015927543,0.0000028671977,0.000016257864],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986897,0.00057293527,0.00025583137,0.000099427845,0.0001885067,0.00019359327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866796,0.00080012676,0.00028648923,0.00009309661,0.000073702795,0.000078648634],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051722606,0.00006208565,0.0002955189,0.000005376869,0.00027178222,0.000007329695,0.00013819979,0.00003798567,0.000036347956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015526046,0.000039578623,0.000063235195,0.00018539264,0.0035020108,0.000051510437,0.000027641927,0.00007542505,0.0000010463486],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021220587,0.000026922402,0.009752068,0.00007023768,0.00001904769,5.801122e-7,0.014643043,0.000001786036,0.000024840143,0.1506792,0.0002478495,0.82453233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026772518,0.00045399313,0.0127382465,0.0015035522,0.0002719517,0.0000033060865,0.31616968,0.000094737705,0.00010031816,0.008863995,0.65903944,0.00049304846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048961147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004973886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8240393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024844188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006323742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053225233","doi":"10.1177/000312240707200509","title":"Right-Wing Parties and Anti-foreigner Sentiment in Europe","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Right wing; Wing; Political science; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04113933714586341,"score_gpt":0.36674036781248837,"score_spread":0.32560103066662494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053225233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9268837,0.027929535,0.000062820145,0.0033547168,0.00011649727,0.00055852544,0.0000023996745,0.000112080066,0.0409797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9057517,0.08581915,0.00053770316,0.007329496,0.00012527287,0.000017421584,0.000004560229,0.000010330519,0.0004043364],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975939,0.0006213348,0.00045238668,0.00036203853,0.00034429392,0.00062607805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904364,0.00033526795,0.00021130579,0.00016141408,0.000059308102,0.00018905736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029445807,0.00016740063,0.00054057746,0.00004066736,0.00029639376,0.000029327914,0.00024263033,0.0000617994,0.00027836688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076705846,0.00011497818,0.00007825289,0.0006016047,0.0014834576,0.0001151962,0.00010584031,0.0002244317,0.00008579975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028974988,0.00055993884,0.55096996,0.00053236465,0.00012643785,0.00044994106,0.011681563,0.0000016910493,0.0009229921,0.15355624,0.012580001,0.26858988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024594416,0.00012969601,0.25416154,0.0009001599,0.000052473006,0.0000020271616,0.0020537307,0.0000017440134,0.00003566998,0.0033382082,0.7386013,0.00047750605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006728386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001246744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7260213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000114440816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005052393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54658616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066784166","doi":"10.1177/000312240707200406","title":"Who Survives on Death Row? An Individual and Contextual Analysis","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Ideology; Politics; Explanatory power; Power (physics); Psychology; Presidential system; Social psychology; Criminology; Capital (architecture); Face (sociological concept); State (computer science); Event (particle physics); Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence; History","score_opus":0.09109832674413425,"score_gpt":0.42924508714874804,"score_spread":0.3381467604046138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066784166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9751105,0.014574579,0.0012464831,0.0010068644,0.00003459802,0.00017444786,0.000010864435,0.00007049098,0.0077711726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90849316,0.08605011,0.00016512777,0.0050227717,0.00013321717,0.000009946966,0.000018193223,0.000004191622,0.00010328923],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797285,0.00069486105,0.00028871972,0.00035937363,0.00033364768,0.00035057988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983015,0.0009859428,0.00018415316,0.00017814423,0.000093179464,0.0002570462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024099124,0.00013806662,0.00064001564,0.000104415965,0.00048673214,0.000045640998,0.00022238269,0.0000668152,0.00035693962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008734574,0.000101579404,0.00026615005,0.0012293727,0.0010444749,0.000083487226,0.000038730945,0.00020084549,0.000025346959],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001729583,0.00013456706,0.053605225,0.000026732312,0.00039942667,0.0000128289485,0.0055926195,0.0000019842817,0.000002266765,0.014616164,0.0002535879,0.9253373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016466256,0.0014459316,0.47406432,0.00024173634,0.008801345,0.0000027242738,0.42667148,0.000024882032,0.0000022962674,0.0004440932,0.0874126,0.00072391616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069627566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006056043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92461336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005160819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040044608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074830437","doi":"10.1177/000312240907400302","title":"A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":705,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Epistemology; Sociology; Action (physics); Sociological theory; Social theory; Mechanism (biology); Social science; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.06515577497735647,"score_gpt":0.4045437338322325,"score_spread":0.33938795885487605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074830437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022582129,0.055558886,0.010246683,0.08583025,0.0002314283,0.0018976205,0.000038922364,0.0005255643,0.8230885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94863176,0.029381752,0.0011883762,0.02008268,0.00013701955,0.000021568696,0.000007654529,0.0000045631555,0.0005446302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99361384,0.0050569465,0.00043242757,0.0002653215,0.0002956234,0.00033584144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968076,0.0022477955,0.00056418823,0.00015902196,0.000099147306,0.00012226276],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056187133,0.0001520405,0.0007283712,0.000016609774,0.00047938462,0.000012705176,0.00042477154,0.00012935283,0.002173754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004724368,0.00010955749,0.00032186188,0.0003994024,0.002136958,0.00013692894,0.00003796453,0.0003380693,0.000088274144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027770111,0.00007149421,0.000015841626,0.000027274906,0.000015846821,0.000005063995,0.0012868872,1.5014225e-8,0.00006445577,0.8238263,0.0013496582,0.1733094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009486563,0.0005131963,0.0028597696,0.00012476977,0.00006788591,0.000001938315,0.003508037,1.6627536e-7,0.0000059161207,0.7237576,0.26884308,0.00022277646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023702733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010741737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92604965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044185905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100778576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077874692","doi":"10.1177/0003122411435477","title":"Is Breastfeeding Truly Cost Free? Income Consequences of Breastfeeding for Women","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Breastfeeding Practices and Influences","field":"Medicine","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Breastfeeding; Earnings; Medicine; Breast feeding; National Longitudinal Surveys; Work (physics); Psychology; Breast milk; Nursing; Demographic economics; Demography; Family medicine; Pediatrics; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07214629878549111,"score_gpt":0.38272595884788974,"score_spread":0.3105796600623986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077874692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5573709,0.16407228,0.00048049647,0.24568373,0.0006348553,0.0044931266,0.00036789308,0.00037404217,0.02652268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9555106,0.030720795,0.0029370051,0.009952451,0.00041617133,0.0003121727,0.000009596523,0.000020864913,0.00012032771],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976451,0.00013718264,0.0007318613,0.00034820518,0.0003507603,0.00078689994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711573,0.0010213293,0.00083055295,0.00033219162,0.0002465911,0.0004536063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019195986,0.0002827871,0.0013549681,0.00005954862,0.00012779684,0.000014978302,0.0003303578,0.00011279603,0.00077565195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022318137,0.00018962787,0.00035290312,0.00042902972,0.0016983382,0.00032117954,0.00012391589,0.00031947374,0.00003524891],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032142314,0.0003649311,0.27829775,0.004781667,0.0004293842,0.000004072337,0.001283363,1.8957563e-7,0.003431865,0.005036895,0.006846974,0.69920146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019984252,0.0031599144,0.7615674,0.0064696386,0.00094176666,0.00084782194,0.002451998,0.000017051008,0.0005320552,0.0022878333,0.21880883,0.00091727305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001227812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.546434e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6982842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001443119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011124092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8492845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082614797","doi":"10.1177/000312240607100302","title":"Trends in Civic Association Activity in Four Democracies: The Special Case of Women in the United States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Waterloo; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); State (computer science); Voluntary association; Political science; Demographic economics; Physical activity; Civic engagement; Test (biology); Demography; Psychology; Sociology; Politics; Medicine; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.038509289502745646,"score_gpt":0.3462359057468217,"score_spread":0.3077266162440761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082614797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98177534,0.0023977584,0.0000011629412,0.01042077,0.000040848143,0.00026867594,0.0000055645774,0.000010961238,0.0050789323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97244835,0.025289537,0.0000044761164,0.0017105619,0.00035611595,0.00009009604,0.000007677351,0.0000034472102,0.00008972079],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952381,0.00344891,0.0003407005,0.00016875862,0.0002631512,0.00054038316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99667615,0.0028077005,0.0003397886,0.00010207172,0.000036639252,0.000037675425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056533744,0.00010813069,0.00047983878,0.00006574341,0.00015846021,0.000016858317,0.0002619162,0.000095686715,0.00017144775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011780972,0.00006070156,0.0001190225,0.0025848483,0.0007220184,0.00006250834,0.000035557558,0.00040837724,0.0000049838745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007270399,0.0007163971,0.3712052,0.00010247086,0.000035340396,0.00034339307,0.14561597,0.00008775121,0.0000054984357,0.014097687,0.012987182,0.4547304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033117356,0.00020673196,0.847962,0.00019185677,0.000024109984,0.0000039874567,0.078749605,0.000040701787,3.5800048e-7,0.024080351,0.04814445,0.00026466424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035229485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0262412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4767568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087343535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005559551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083683399","doi":"10.1177/000312240907400606","title":"When Work Interferes with Life: Work-Nonwork Interference and the Influence of Work-Related Demands and Resources","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":481,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Perspective (graphical); Distribution (mathematics); Social psychology; Set (abstract data type); Work stress; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.021838152229167622,"score_gpt":0.29491613026789837,"score_spread":0.27307797803873074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083683399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78227514,0.20057377,0.00002132259,0.014033267,0.000017903252,0.00047181622,0.0000011253721,0.00007765066,0.0025280241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76027197,0.23661812,0.00032422415,0.002605514,0.000042194253,0.00003307706,8.0401213e-7,0.0000068315526,0.000097281234],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970411,0.0012941739,0.00050036574,0.00044303475,0.00029245924,0.0004288465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969908,0.0018870049,0.0005092289,0.00030487461,0.00010672178,0.00020136002],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001690637,0.00025907758,0.0009698322,0.00002978842,0.00026463054,0.00005493974,0.0005728781,0.00013008653,0.00008212686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017475908,0.00013698003,0.00009522577,0.0008428797,0.008335163,0.00010506791,0.00014719232,0.00052534696,0.0000064213546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008249064,0.00010191502,0.59953016,0.0001600288,0.00017941519,0.0000073570754,0.037100405,0.00001100435,0.0000022869308,0.0053796605,0.0030565204,0.35364634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006018559,0.0006369229,0.96242565,0.010091969,0.00017119532,0.0000028068348,0.0070287623,2.7568822e-7,2.7102203e-7,0.0058005657,0.012792094,0.0004476521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010028463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019014815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36289546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036338566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052975924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085024069","doi":"10.1177/000312240607100305","title":"“Fair” Inequality? Attitudes toward Pay Differentials: The United States in Comparative Perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":452,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Inequality; Earnings; World Values Survey; General Social Survey; Survey data collection; Demographic economics; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Convergence (economics); Exceptionalism; Value (mathematics); Economic inequality; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Economic growth; Demography; Population; Census; Law","score_opus":0.20877655861426714,"score_gpt":0.47703524683238036,"score_spread":0.2682586882181132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085024069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6662817,0.03536325,0.00035460712,0.28587773,0.00025122875,0.00097111316,0.000055596844,0.00009737303,0.010747385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559984,0.035227187,0.00009610855,0.0077184997,0.00035633583,0.00016064258,0.0000968455,0.000003311021,0.00034267077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968374,0.0019419158,0.00039360035,0.00024609937,0.0002979859,0.0002830267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978911,0.0014390597,0.00019513171,0.00009778367,0.00033232864,0.000044571207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011803636,0.00014288913,0.00046816238,0.000030678493,0.0004145528,0.0000318374,0.00025534577,0.000034554632,0.00029516759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078422355,0.00007082642,0.00013378818,0.0005669352,0.0018356366,0.000057872756,0.00005715281,0.00022415763,0.00005935335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013465359,0.00038606185,0.045006804,0.00006934513,0.00007547198,0.0000014561645,0.02527547,0.000044115095,0.000006621746,0.8987901,0.029682754,0.00064831314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001508378,0.00017089953,0.5217004,0.000394431,0.00006198341,5.5759836e-7,0.13034071,0.000021826394,0.0000054153725,0.106471725,0.24022107,0.00046012743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0450854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036675616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7923184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026086217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010218849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96127343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087088801","doi":"10.1177/000312240406900306","title":"The Social Construction of Market Value: Institutionalization and Learning Perspectives on Stock Market Reactions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Stock market; Corporate governance; Valuation (finance); Nonmarket forces; Market value; Business; Factor market; Capital market; Economics; Financial economics; Market economy; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.022428845165570827,"score_gpt":0.27633572843636084,"score_spread":0.25390688327079003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087088801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7913189,0.041718274,0.0052313427,0.039891776,0.00037741737,0.0014765891,0.000019739284,0.00025609526,0.119709894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9252979,0.07249226,0.00019379101,0.0015550307,0.0002693724,0.00002993207,0.000006238208,0.000006096745,0.00014935838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931705,0.000062971994,0.00019866388,0.00017328859,0.00013689016,0.00011115922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991824,0.00012978741,0.00051192724,0.00006671613,0.000103590646,0.000005570685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045106554,0.00009322682,0.00020861329,0.000017906239,0.0005246894,0.00002386784,0.000074065836,0.000028941518,0.00007376333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008399828,0.00006187968,0.0000707228,0.00031319904,0.0008739335,0.0001657114,0.000032390773,0.00018020606,0.000010262347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007930478,0.000074567135,0.012509503,0.0003869699,0.000037591482,0.0000018117711,0.00008630338,0.000051740226,0.000019419313,0.8761581,0.005570319,0.10502437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032992614,0.00008378575,0.523358,0.00067347,0.00008328968,0.000004857434,0.0018343535,0.00006819429,6.167213e-7,0.009912874,0.46344313,0.00020750196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013052147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000032089506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8662452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005123268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028319513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40355396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087608299","doi":"10.1177/000312240807300407","title":"Democratization, Women's Movements, and Gender-Equitable States: A Framework for Comparison","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Ideology; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Politics; State (computer science); Gender studies; Political science; Social movement; Variation (astronomy); Sociology; Political economy; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.13913348756067376,"score_gpt":0.42962454904276887,"score_spread":0.29049106148209514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087608299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51848984,0.12712917,0.31278536,0.021757798,0.00041706837,0.0048910147,0.00007977903,0.00037412325,0.014075846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7575083,0.21978576,0.011579524,0.010272493,0.00014466961,0.0002871268,0.00003223251,0.00000953,0.00038038494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854475,0.00027443253,0.00027651538,0.0002377145,0.00019974947,0.00046685882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989415,0.00047782698,0.00019243512,0.000105201245,0.00010744744,0.00017559149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006346968,0.00009963281,0.0003704214,0.000014376712,0.00078655087,0.00002031645,0.00012260785,0.000057418896,0.00012033273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093040965,0.00007692986,0.000061722014,0.00019434492,0.0009003706,0.000057616482,0.000040325423,0.000100017605,0.000011833544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020748541,0.0003939671,0.11382031,0.0010601772,0.00019300373,0.0000051728684,0.08702445,0.00003076077,0.000019523413,0.68740714,0.041355155,0.06866963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029762747,0.00041430836,0.019348044,0.00017304905,0.00005433016,0.0000018575378,0.03864697,0.000100384066,0.000004284299,0.57839817,0.3621152,0.00044580697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014139155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000032297398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32076004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091808644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009678075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6049593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093505855","doi":"10.1177/0003122413477419","title":"Can Honorific Awards Give Us Clues about the Connection between Socioeconomic Status and Mortality?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Honorific; Socioeconomic status; Longevity; Hierarchy; Argument (complex analysis); Competition (biology); Social hierarchy; Demographic economics; Social status; Relative deprivation; CONTEST; Demography; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Economics; Gerontology; Social science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.05779002800240379,"score_gpt":0.39289336350746706,"score_spread":0.33510333550506327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093505855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90875036,0.034361914,0.000006854321,0.05313444,0.00014932908,0.00080743013,0.000027942486,0.000071768074,0.002689941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71813756,0.25907862,0.000028106722,0.022183817,0.00030819292,0.00013251156,0.000010577911,0.000006288273,0.00011431726],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744236,0.001031863,0.00040432755,0.00029920795,0.00016772497,0.00065449165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979216,0.001214866,0.00028153794,0.00018774887,0.000073165174,0.0003211093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012349288,0.00015803751,0.0006354887,0.00001275082,0.0008507571,0.000081522936,0.00022116066,0.000094835705,0.0007494659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000700941,0.000096933385,0.00015278684,0.000117621035,0.0025073157,0.00011119663,0.000059802744,0.00029532672,0.0001509156],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.2914736e-7,0.000009070792,0.8932064,0.00017515571,0.00004447986,3.9633753e-7,0.0017793217,1.3032243e-7,1.8280639e-7,0.012753027,0.0055592754,0.08647184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005594696,0.000051558745,0.81709564,0.00007884569,0.0000431439,1.9326966e-7,0.005819219,8.5545236e-7,1.1621696e-7,0.00403938,0.17268409,0.00013101453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08450549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014405224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22471671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022111875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023596258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92383087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099393405","doi":"10.1177/0003122412443365","title":"Resolving the Democracy Paradox","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":177,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Democracy; Legislature; Politics; Representation (politics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Development economics; Economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.09692534005713933,"score_gpt":0.42775994984721005,"score_spread":0.33083460979007073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099393405","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10306921,0.3708471,0.00079313805,0.25730324,0.0007643356,0.0015940999,0.000005210934,0.0002561538,0.26536748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8934695,0.09479661,0.00035155623,0.010529932,0.00044071907,0.000026635073,0.0000019618878,0.0000036745,0.0003793939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982869,0.00081502233,0.00016448785,0.00010845428,0.00021078438,0.00041435033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990182,0.00052656484,0.00012529193,0.00015248812,0.000035961875,0.00014150272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014651006,0.000067077235,0.00018695425,0.000005995829,0.0005872268,0.0000165868,0.00022212534,0.000031326144,0.00029814694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011700243,0.000035269593,0.000116519936,0.00019348557,0.0010720821,0.00006545477,0.000045993653,0.00014680241,0.00020828175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027979397,0.00012337082,0.09509568,0.00011066068,0.000050483894,0.0000023309572,0.013223604,9.1141806e-7,0.000021813385,0.53811604,0.08467667,0.26857567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025695606,0.000020630998,0.04816609,0.000062066865,0.000036377594,0.0000014915179,0.0044735116,9.593039e-7,0.0000015148953,0.008308015,0.9387969,0.00010677118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005739129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005749943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8541202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042577733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041954663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45165336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108976036","doi":"10.1177/000312240607100206","title":"Infant Mortality, Social Networks, and Subsequent Fertility","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Demography; Macro; Population; Infant mortality; Linkage (software); Social network (sociolinguistics); Social learning; Demographic economics; Geography; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06954472912589711,"score_gpt":0.4116705918219727,"score_spread":0.3421258626960756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108976036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.765341,0.14631316,0.00019989762,0.06409486,0.00020783085,0.00096922606,0.000017833572,0.00022304805,0.02263318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87688243,0.10096981,0.00006808961,0.021571675,0.000347225,0.000045278175,0.000010720839,0.0000051360885,0.00009965975],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976936,0.00082275795,0.00039228736,0.0002713037,0.00025118765,0.0005688591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991346,0.00035047493,0.00017829506,0.00011381283,0.000050662813,0.00017217314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015854526,0.00013202634,0.0005853028,0.000008409943,0.0006291965,0.000032177737,0.00016782084,0.00008852033,0.0002598239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040691186,0.00009744707,0.00015304402,0.00022198794,0.0020042013,0.000058083555,0.00007062997,0.00020933906,0.000014189888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072558614,0.000083898914,0.7605883,0.0004984139,0.000022930053,0.000010424291,0.00033402568,9.495449e-7,4.0923268e-7,0.15871191,0.021586038,0.058155455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042465246,0.000019777599,0.8021613,0.000079241865,0.000024595845,2.6149252e-7,0.00029713367,0.0000031760762,4.0515e-8,0.0024478957,0.19480373,0.00012040047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027943926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017119955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17321768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011481048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010588948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9785291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131234948","doi":"10.1177/0003122414548194","title":"Varieties of Capitalism and Job Quality","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"German; Capitalism; Quality (philosophy); Dimension (graph theory); Political science; Demographic economics; European Social Survey; Sociology; Economics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.06521015101240381,"score_gpt":0.4421991319557683,"score_spread":0.3769889809433645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131234948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5377269,0.12461363,0.00013291242,0.06641921,0.0002444849,0.0007720875,0.00001646544,0.00019455414,0.2698798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75658506,0.23868306,0.00011252749,0.004249544,0.00017549765,0.000013783524,6.903445e-7,0.0000024642627,0.00017737749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828553,0.0009315386,0.00025433043,0.00014024167,0.00017964463,0.00020872358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881935,0.000732925,0.00021233584,0.00009076712,0.0000662496,0.000078351266],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016653229,0.00008278398,0.0005487492,0.000008323398,0.0003056896,0.000005775296,0.00012806641,0.00005657621,0.000033552322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003016934,0.000051633917,0.000113684146,0.00015063475,0.0048123966,0.000033437813,0.00006094514,0.00010199544,0.000009096434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002308725,0.000017342309,0.008209853,0.0002197647,0.000028278997,1.4588403e-7,0.006341403,1.1904484e-8,0.000007559086,0.8998459,0.0014207882,0.08390665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020701479,0.00043740947,0.3466754,0.0004033328,0.00012436925,6.46512e-7,0.024352971,4.8135263e-7,0.000004290617,0.3867016,0.24058492,0.00050755823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039517293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008186014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5131443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015913649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029570385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99789596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132692129","doi":"10.1177/0003122413480362","title":"Only 15 Minutes? The Social Stratification of Fame in Printed Media","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ephemeral key; Scholarship; Social stratification; Hierarchy; Entertainment; Sociology; Social hierarchy; Social media; Stratification (seeds); Media studies; Social science; Art; Computer science; Visual arts; World Wide Web; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05942096949907605,"score_gpt":0.3686902491852038,"score_spread":0.3092692796861278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132692129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93235856,0.008402365,0.000019257986,0.04600466,0.00008572406,0.0010758576,0.000007931212,0.000058723097,0.011986919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97371346,0.023282215,0.00012965297,0.0024839304,0.00013568485,0.000092696675,0.000014261908,0.0000036654253,0.00014441404],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982,0.00078046334,0.00035080433,0.00016662889,0.00025757306,0.00024454124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889594,0.0005098198,0.00030320554,0.00009537159,0.00014070758,0.000054944634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067079643,0.000096526965,0.00037615214,0.0000092447735,0.00022056238,0.000017000992,0.00036281245,0.000080830185,0.0005646566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011330146,0.000053853222,0.00014795108,0.0005287346,0.0021039501,0.000075635864,0.000034005592,0.00021211946,0.000091885464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003999211,0.00012319726,0.011140465,0.00009133426,0.0000243906,7.7910715e-7,0.024927448,1.3400442e-7,0.00021604652,0.11856691,0.006560937,0.83834434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014292808,0.000098769844,0.87052476,0.0003099346,0.000051685318,5.546357e-7,0.071473286,0.000009734546,0.0000031391735,0.027847001,0.02921552,0.00032265397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029533468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000819377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8593843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007346393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010944643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77520925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147046775","doi":"10.1177/0003122410368929","title":"Stained Red","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":181,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Moral panic; Harm; Stigma (botany); Association (psychology); Wrongdoing; Spillover effect; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Psychiatry; Economics","score_opus":0.03023266932009205,"score_gpt":0.3977172744957033,"score_spread":0.36748460517561127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147046775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12412523,0.050974455,0.00025814684,0.112392195,0.0013473158,0.0024869128,0.000021500366,0.0009395762,0.7074547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9053969,0.07741337,0.0004670227,0.0148188835,0.0007506378,0.000080350845,0.000006073445,0.000009783617,0.0010570181],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997943,0.0006806077,0.0002904864,0.00029189602,0.00030817444,0.00048586525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986342,0.00053508265,0.00020527151,0.00023681899,0.00014101352,0.0002475893],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016580615,0.00013867393,0.00058957184,0.000014739736,0.0005494376,0.000030257035,0.00040738977,0.00011533436,0.0017938849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041089933,0.00010548696,0.0002708649,0.00037986226,0.0022806749,0.00007123153,0.000039178052,0.00048413072,0.0002571749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017008342,0.00012440472,0.0058863987,0.00011432552,0.000048763148,0.000019275776,0.0039625345,2.769049e-8,0.00055762037,0.25626844,0.041365836,0.6916354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095511525,0.0000665594,0.0037015583,0.000055334374,0.00003303832,3.8632956e-7,0.00170895,5.122588e-7,8.691885e-7,0.0044879382,0.9896688,0.00018056112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007472906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033214712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9483029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053869706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019422217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147339182","doi":"10.1177/0003122414564998","title":"Contact Theory in a Small-Town Settler-Colonial Context","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Prejudice (legal term); Racism; Contact hypothesis; Sociology; Hostility; Social psychology; Colonialism; Ideology; Context (archaeology); Gender studies; Friendship; White (mutation); Politics; Psychology; Geography; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12071235649993009,"score_gpt":0.41704165814616967,"score_spread":0.2963293016462396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147339182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59991693,0.091832355,0.00019711658,0.0813621,0.0011865975,0.0017122931,0.000017492961,0.00030462412,0.22347046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9321654,0.02858076,0.00011431554,0.03805678,0.00035036445,0.00012429885,0.0000061021456,0.000008978466,0.0005930168],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996058,0.002528347,0.0003855071,0.0003410352,0.00017552268,0.00051162235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983879,0.00086343044,0.00021619364,0.0001647092,0.00010161976,0.0002661823],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029880756,0.00016133409,0.0007228429,0.000028347822,0.00012846626,0.000017205693,0.00044081235,0.00015003885,0.00096923945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003928934,0.00011927194,0.00020021036,0.0004212058,0.0018748055,0.00006196822,0.00006517659,0.00036991743,0.00039587077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014135444,0.0002730051,0.021283226,0.000036876176,0.000050198207,0.000055424705,0.016888632,6.76539e-8,0.000025454547,0.3922893,0.049130846,0.51982564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056803285,0.00081849884,0.021076962,0.00034561445,0.00003431621,0.0000036286913,0.015133584,4.902456e-7,7.3069646e-7,0.060816363,0.90084714,0.000354623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037492646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012760063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8517163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023680548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021997454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160375947","doi":"10.1177/0003122413514584","title":"Unmasking the Conflicting Trends in Job Tenure by Gender in the United States, 1983–2008","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Parallels; Demographic economics; Marital status; Childbirth; Labour economics; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Demography; Population; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.13930667440588548,"score_gpt":0.4714916493966366,"score_spread":0.33218497499075117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160375947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63212895,0.11042451,0.00002363535,0.23585178,0.00014356035,0.002404207,0.000025350097,0.00012992106,0.018868072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7421503,0.14941281,0.000025522231,0.10658412,0.00010680313,0.0010046333,0.00011645188,0.000016661921,0.00058269105],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525684,0.0030166304,0.0006400174,0.0002637766,0.00020180884,0.00062093494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968926,0.0024018895,0.00031850376,0.00027054813,0.00006649141,0.000050023184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017817835,0.00020385059,0.00057495956,0.000052014675,0.00054256094,0.000008643699,0.00032944704,0.00008467134,0.0006974597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005721658,0.00008658288,0.000102514685,0.0010718005,0.000546647,0.000043891694,0.00013974165,0.0011462237,0.00013038363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067110727,0.000078220524,0.4672411,0.00028094026,0.000051114526,0.000009176248,0.021900859,0.0000021899905,0.000007794705,0.00204134,0.4360062,0.07237436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002203959,0.00007765237,0.4011769,0.0005583964,0.00002527453,9.678815e-7,0.019445585,0.000014846862,4.228555e-8,0.0006856403,0.57763064,0.00016366916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058689704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000116933516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14162444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008837165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022753356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8872167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2205882371","doi":"10.1177/0003122415619617","title":"Childhood Disadvantage and Health Problems in Middle and Later Life","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":293,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Disadvantage; Psychology; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Environmental health; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.21989723952351975,"score_gpt":0.47048004084664513,"score_spread":0.2505828013231254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2205882371","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43316928,0.45031592,0.0000118771,0.11114627,0.00008132681,0.0018452547,0.000012472445,0.00009343491,0.0033241697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5775076,0.38179678,0.00012836939,0.04013401,0.00007104333,0.00019365815,0.000011101121,0.000009940364,0.00014745863],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806356,0.00069771806,0.0004574419,0.0002740617,0.00010049672,0.00040672565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990972,0.00026216055,0.00021979287,0.00011442875,0.00002914053,0.00027722164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012636787,0.0001474036,0.000742843,0.000018495468,0.00019657092,0.0000028852498,0.00006693259,0.000048691898,0.00004291182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004779778,0.0000891278,0.000033266802,0.00012902994,0.00039484203,0.00004490293,0.00019287261,0.00036691982,0.00004247584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003397967,0.000053357813,0.9612611,0.001043946,0.000015090856,0.0000014341639,0.0041780346,4.7861864e-8,3.1006778e-7,0.0007774586,0.009988597,0.02267722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005076112,0.00046714648,0.8888608,0.0025321438,0.000014323416,0.0000011615774,0.0034376057,7.223842e-7,1.4847866e-8,0.0020316679,0.10197903,0.00016777389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003190348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007471316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14433837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005607448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000862274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36345264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2223863017","doi":"10.1177/0003122415596999","title":"A Paper Ceiling","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Newspaper; Representation (politics); Inequality; Media coverage; Gender inequality; Demographic economics; Glass ceiling; Ceiling (cloud); Mass media; Occupational segregation; Political science; Sociology; Advertising; Politics; Media studies; Geography; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.18778640098463958,"score_gpt":0.45648880604820985,"score_spread":0.26870240506357024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2223863017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06435347,0.13993073,0.00063177536,0.091937974,0.00050707115,0.0010045614,0.0000050969634,0.0003223428,0.701307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8998252,0.08148989,0.0009679795,0.016632108,0.00031559478,0.000029601591,0.0000049134032,0.000004730626,0.00072998524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988267,0.00043291532,0.0001439338,0.00014271234,0.0002169428,0.00023678994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940675,0.0001168616,0.00008070165,0.00009888556,0.00008353563,0.000213253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089711364,0.000056727924,0.00020342412,0.000007368727,0.00012555586,0.000013047507,0.00013349678,0.000031775326,0.00019857117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012330418,0.000038928054,0.00008367678,0.00016520209,0.0006910427,0.000046708545,0.00002901102,0.00009062166,0.00021691424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066317953,0.0001646366,0.016703464,0.00017720727,0.000056724955,0.000022837927,0.016413767,0.0000047069852,0.000052240935,0.4354103,0.122274734,0.40871274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005270211,0.00005197748,0.0018903165,0.00006216135,0.000017598984,7.7393554e-7,0.006243156,0.0000011913775,7.9195183e-7,0.013505432,0.9780753,0.00009858924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010648115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016617825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85580057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005874603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001357253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2788066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235597883","doi":"10.1177/0003122415613414","title":"Altared States","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Politics; Political science; Institutionalism; Public policy; Law; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.17758165821256008,"score_gpt":0.4580257571533388,"score_spread":0.2804440989407787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235597883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15283221,0.21802947,0.0013389796,0.16843785,0.00081383885,0.0019238484,0.000026745014,0.0006005968,0.45599645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8101109,0.17185389,0.0011257194,0.015446818,0.00026551477,0.00004243186,0.000025428057,0.000006346366,0.0011229118],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987655,0.0004663072,0.0001489177,0.0001426138,0.00022776809,0.00024885495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993331,0.00013049305,0.000093022856,0.00009815546,0.00010607274,0.00023918741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079015264,0.000059936792,0.0002162046,0.000008366715,0.00011708576,0.000014052173,0.00014595375,0.000027533355,0.00015530935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094054797,0.000041225587,0.000071980976,0.00017138963,0.00083027815,0.000035456655,0.000029500949,0.0000785908,0.00022118898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009324904,0.00019021716,0.028929358,0.000189122,0.0000720122,0.000022864173,0.021828275,0.000009573948,0.000012602626,0.23080812,0.40963665,0.30829188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059743088,0.00007936838,0.0022980834,0.00005008585,0.000017411769,5.5097405e-7,0.008904992,0.0000027415467,0.0000010006227,0.024320472,0.9641616,0.00010394991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002002428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024354284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6572787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006370145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013546494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30591944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338947170","doi":"10.1177/0003122415591800","title":"The (Re)genesis of Values","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Action (physics); Dual (grammatical number); Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Cognition; Focus (optics); Discipline; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Social science","score_opus":0.2990129166487381,"score_gpt":0.4743115732246847,"score_spread":0.17529865657594662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338947170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5366455,0.43137822,0.0000283798,0.0062627513,0.00026746237,0.0003243062,0.000007829396,0.00005960511,0.025025988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86710507,0.12807468,0.00015299942,0.0033085267,0.00011009323,0.00006801937,0.000005298177,0.0000062117483,0.0011691005],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860793,0.000551606,0.0002945822,0.00018729002,0.00014440065,0.00021420537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988329,0.00047533467,0.00022907695,0.00027426542,0.000091922826,0.00009653156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005983565,0.00011021691,0.00043809196,0.0000050297026,0.000065970235,0.0000058982373,0.00031398414,0.00003775382,0.00050246343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005481406,0.00004702374,0.00018781386,0.00016571775,0.000967851,0.0000143450125,0.000059267753,0.000103877326,0.00029733777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034102275,0.000104300176,0.0262441,0.000086575594,0.00013516295,0.000003890796,0.0016238232,1.7009616e-7,0.000029204231,0.030272791,0.2414245,0.7000414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030470738,0.0016890176,0.4764607,0.0004276954,0.00020999789,0.000011168442,0.019071696,0.000003315469,0.000007624319,0.014557407,0.48686498,0.00039168302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027499365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002222206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6996497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001530538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001695195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55016226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343133767","doi":"10.1177/0003122416643758","title":"Why Is There No Labor Party in the United States? Political Articulation and the Canadian Comparison, 1932 to 1948","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political economy; Political science; Mainstream; Unrest; Rhetorical question; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.045982595679793216,"score_gpt":0.36556741248436014,"score_spread":0.3195848168045669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343133767","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23007794,0.0038136945,0.000035390538,0.7607283,0.000038850838,0.0008247743,0.00005376208,0.000019657313,0.004407608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.709174,0.011297459,0.000026837753,0.27933198,0.000048594324,0.000054630385,0.000005981174,0.0000027018937,0.0000578472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974664,0.0014846,0.00023238544,0.00016850022,0.00021036896,0.00043773523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984234,0.0009915357,0.00007741339,0.00016857832,0.00010212635,0.00023695212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014089319,0.000091618014,0.00027195038,0.000020455509,0.0004329132,0.000044662986,0.00024403838,0.0000407091,0.00041259843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012001925,0.000033212084,0.000049371272,0.0004977968,0.0016562939,0.000037226462,0.000029630122,0.00012720226,0.000036600988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007238022,0.000032359847,0.04074411,0.0000064561286,0.000014267051,0.0000019487427,0.0037338312,3.1725378e-7,9.860236e-7,0.8951711,0.051759414,0.008527979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121211,0.000043810913,0.14762615,0.00008490462,0.000015337275,1.117816e-7,0.002126573,0.0000047639273,1.2214991e-7,0.0037230083,0.84618676,0.00006722785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41572386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25221553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8914481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012365721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010280693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7614296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2401807756","doi":"10.1177/0003122416668154","title":"Class Advantage, Commitment Penalty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":351,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Elite; Social class; Audit; Psychology; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Labour economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Accounting; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.17985695867541154,"score_gpt":0.40439910643493654,"score_spread":0.224542147759525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2401807756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06645053,0.057328597,0.0030307143,0.34208143,0.00055938266,0.002004694,0.00010715832,0.00063259003,0.5278049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71492964,0.26463863,0.0003898489,0.018658876,0.00011545144,0.000020521078,0.000002894923,0.000003424438,0.0012407291],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977351,0.0011692296,0.00020434026,0.00024856304,0.00028619048,0.0003566001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988865,0.0004983939,0.0001643373,0.00019392652,0.00006571031,0.00019109494],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014274697,0.00010110234,0.00037129445,0.000009313512,0.00033776776,0.000009210284,0.00035105704,0.000048852056,0.002453076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009164901,0.000056048044,0.00018184615,0.0001690407,0.0016459927,0.0000886158,0.000099961166,0.00010530565,0.0008858061],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013671746,0.00015038432,0.029313946,0.00014097782,0.000055558223,0.000013972263,0.0014420742,2.4481851e-8,0.00005477865,0.18113726,0.087859124,0.6998182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092180875,0.000107084314,0.010198531,0.00017632575,0.000025010217,3.4196543e-7,0.0021801488,3.2641882e-8,0.0000018260647,0.0033152099,0.983767,0.00013632256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000277076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003412169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8959079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015623403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007337314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464393218","doi":"10.1177/0003122416650963","title":"Modeling Dynamic Identities and Uncertainty in Social Interactions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social Power and Status Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Generalization; Social identity theory; Social psychology; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Perception; Social learning; Social identity approach; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Social group","score_opus":0.047985901157797155,"score_gpt":0.4153927610026215,"score_spread":0.36740685984482435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2464393218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8966415,0.024131458,0.0047782543,0.045533616,0.00038777856,0.0008087571,0.00004480906,0.0002508037,0.027423017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8570603,0.14106709,0.000073566196,0.0013889507,0.00008012067,0.000033786568,0.0000024524493,0.0000053455196,0.00028835467],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850583,0.0005207568,0.00025682055,0.00022260174,0.00016461305,0.00032939293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930745,0.00041161114,0.000083398176,0.00006482885,0.00005445635,0.000078247605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066326186,0.000103574974,0.00037285942,0.000030667077,0.0003888832,0.000021500067,0.00014769648,0.000053878186,0.0001435096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086716225,0.000069153066,0.00011017441,0.00024577437,0.0013831502,0.00013352498,0.000054284672,0.00015850962,0.00002201028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025681653,0.00011977912,0.01246288,0.00015776703,0.000056702047,0.000015263351,0.014529462,0.0000126925,0.00004784191,0.17545561,0.0016150777,0.79550123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001927363,0.0005357083,0.06442996,0.004998527,0.00033670187,0.000012710662,0.13432774,0.005613881,2.3758328e-7,0.6249949,0.15978418,0.003038144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013270571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017684407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7924631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026015245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007738648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50962746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616930902","doi":"10.1177/0003122417703087","title":"The Effects of Gendered Occupational Roles on Men’s and Women’s Workplace Authority: Evidence from Microfinance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation","keywords":"Microfinance; Compliance (psychology); Variety (cybernetics); Demographic economics; Business; Political science; Gender studies; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.12378836177421283,"score_gpt":0.38280325524023895,"score_spread":0.25901489346602613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616930902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8976978,0.08913414,0.000062654384,0.009674841,0.00012041227,0.00047227915,0.000016813949,0.000024063738,0.002796964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7055206,0.29327083,0.00013027556,0.0008633484,0.000052466214,0.000029777357,0.0000010148425,0.0000015822345,0.00013012973],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799526,0.0010012783,0.00018727219,0.0002659029,0.0002847282,0.0002655445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617505,0.002869413,0.0004553477,0.0003284803,0.00006874497,0.00010295756],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015265992,0.00010372264,0.0003700895,0.0000057959173,0.0015110456,0.00005508277,0.0005722293,0.0000603593,0.000043967077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077990117,0.000066821274,0.00008590621,0.000053433938,0.0026207545,0.000108302396,0.00015573816,0.00017116164,0.00002097743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025364128,0.00018227239,0.29458302,0.00075246824,0.0001862281,0.00001119298,0.028944595,3.101067e-7,0.00030710554,0.034787405,0.02312083,0.61687094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000163817,0.0003067491,0.93129677,0.0014262156,0.000051106028,1.1080214e-7,0.006998969,0.0000018164319,0.000046370413,0.007549289,0.051946994,0.00021180171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016168884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004091862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63671374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010904845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009818377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618736107","doi":"10.1177/0003122417701115","title":"The Hazards of Expert Control: Chief Risk Officers and Risky Derivatives","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Desk; Control (management); Business; Risk management; Compliance (psychology); Finance; Actuarial science; Economics; Management; Law; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02419467676525442,"score_gpt":0.2858627539920536,"score_spread":0.26166807722679913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618736107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7389837,0.20837756,0.0007379131,0.03078573,0.00029011373,0.0013538001,0.00015330238,0.000119991855,0.019197905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76463115,0.23015946,0.0000591295,0.004845171,0.00020135764,0.000041433042,0.0000033223594,0.000006860245,0.000052128806],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991287,0.00004796555,0.00026367002,0.00022565613,0.00013286177,0.0002011278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975969,0.00030773456,0.0016034226,0.0003909894,0.00008952964,0.000011408819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005191443,0.00014522114,0.0004914075,0.000008039924,0.0005974197,0.00007656012,0.00041048505,0.000030111043,0.00008974557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024147073,0.000079080455,0.00012672921,0.000084284075,0.0016861549,0.00023644112,0.00013491971,0.00015004203,0.000036055208],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059133203,0.000043197168,0.1767733,0.00024880574,0.00007175332,0.0000045371007,0.000027065276,7.214172e-7,0.000027817532,0.008160921,0.045900453,0.7686823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016343301,0.000027610033,0.52183324,0.00025219694,0.00003463573,2.4949415e-7,0.000050443916,0.000022146205,5.709093e-7,0.0006047168,0.47691515,0.00009557475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008116181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024337542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76858675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000088043735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002048052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6212708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620580712","doi":"10.1177/0003122417710462","title":"Where “Old Heads” Prevail: Inmate Hierarchy in a Men’s Prison Unit","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Prison; Exponential random graph models; Criminology; Unit (ring theory); Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Hierarchy; Narrative; Political science; Graph; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.07568654684257914,"score_gpt":0.42148349133043045,"score_spread":0.3457969444878513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620580712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80642325,0.11136898,0.00011621365,0.02222218,0.00016382664,0.0009913968,0.000009120242,0.00016482928,0.058540232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5465144,0.4509169,0.00015236101,0.0012807996,0.00010661543,0.0000959251,0.0000027318756,0.00000592718,0.00092437485],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782914,0.0007928388,0.0003445918,0.00034797064,0.00025796614,0.00042751848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860466,0.0003045876,0.00038023604,0.00046703266,0.00008606176,0.00015745577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013696546,0.0001493863,0.0006274394,0.000043275162,0.00089001784,0.00009329525,0.00065670564,0.000080117316,0.0008129291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018593529,0.0001135704,0.00023036954,0.00033212843,0.0015034052,0.00016300374,0.00012611187,0.00033458634,0.00022688706],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014417731,0.00014730936,0.062618025,0.00036758013,0.0000401683,0.000025221612,0.0050029154,0.0000012155193,0.000011811642,0.0053975447,0.0032591545,0.92311466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026457873,0.00039479337,0.081854895,0.0027959337,0.000527858,0.0000032337819,0.11789774,0.000042255164,0.0000018341908,0.0012932161,0.7942636,0.0006600382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023674829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007489604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9224546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013838323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010796751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9828266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799404671","doi":"10.1177/0003122418772567","title":"A Systematic Assessment of “Axial Age” Proposals Using Global Comparative Historical Evidence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"George Brown College","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Directorate for Biological Sciences; H2020 European Research Council; University of Oxford; Baylor University; University of Exeter; Templeton World Charity Foundation; Royal Society; University of Chicago; Harvard University; State University of New York; University of Minnesota; Princeton University; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; University of Cambridge; Yale University; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Ideology; Modernity; China; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Economic geography; Political science; Politics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.22215910275954476,"score_gpt":0.5079190353741354,"score_spread":0.28575993261459065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799404671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6635561,0.25276244,0.03268807,0.0078876875,0.0010086541,0.0073046144,0.000019963032,0.00036642223,0.034406036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824166,0.013127853,0.0033624496,0.0007375726,0.00022656829,0.000055259963,0.0000016010312,0.000002561011,0.00006953261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948739,0.0036832413,0.00054911594,0.00024537428,0.00041225765,0.00023611303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983052,0.00062968826,0.000474659,0.00017188919,0.00031586827,0.00010272106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023891793,0.00012426446,0.0008597609,0.000011869785,0.0003557415,0.0000130575045,0.0002923209,0.000056400026,0.00021733822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017933949,0.0000869436,0.00015675387,0.0005306888,0.0024548701,0.00013293998,0.000054548455,0.000112699556,0.00003520157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013883662,0.0010879555,0.016508196,0.022265458,0.0004201809,0.000036243175,0.013319734,0.000020755488,0.0014239616,0.92724967,0.006641454,0.010887563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021461651,0.028341644,0.07918213,0.615288,0.0065773265,0.000158397,0.05804859,0.005276233,0.00008749813,0.1347652,0.062844545,0.007284223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005779832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044326294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79248446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011429954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041187645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9045071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801576063","doi":"10.1177/0003122418761857","title":"The Structure of Deference: Modeling Occupational Status Using Affect Control Theory","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Office of Naval Research Global","keywords":"Deference; Operationalization; Occupational prestige; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Psychology; Prestige; Construct (python library); Meritocracy; Job satisfaction; Position (finance); Sociology; Socioeconomic status; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.06759238402009547,"score_gpt":0.41292527573981297,"score_spread":0.3453328917197175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801576063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97034335,0.022631655,0.0038101994,0.0006870985,0.00016632727,0.000515945,0.00005114772,0.000047563237,0.0017466878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745404,0.023382831,0.00034677258,0.0014399496,0.0002577915,0.000004189973,0.000005351537,0.0000037487162,0.000018947785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786896,0.001143339,0.00023661037,0.0001544003,0.00027517937,0.000321523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985089,0.00081148435,0.00023882093,0.00010140991,0.00025836943,0.00008105384],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077172805,0.000100778125,0.00032830235,0.000005617921,0.0008484146,0.00001822628,0.00024690802,0.000065965716,0.00019284387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018707908,0.00005196563,0.00015201369,0.00026105062,0.002974875,0.00004682328,0.000029974979,0.00015149245,0.0000073416163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015008755,0.000047771257,0.019769883,0.00011586032,0.00019166459,9.623257e-7,0.0067528496,0.000084215724,0.00083263085,0.6367212,0.00041801235,0.33491486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001535989,0.002027391,0.06622873,0.0025380447,0.001404407,0.0000066548,0.08868679,0.016028995,0.00002480844,0.75340056,0.06571682,0.002400835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050326774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012906354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33251402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007858687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018948395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904288731","doi":"10.1177/0003122418816109","title":"Encultured Biases: The Role of Products in Pathways to Inequality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intermediary; Inequality; Matching (statistics); Product (mathematics); Sociology; Causal inference; Face (sociological concept); Selection (genetic algorithm); Qualitative property; Social psychology; Economics; Positive economics; Psychology; Marketing; Business; Social science; Econometrics; Computer science","score_opus":0.10424248713226564,"score_gpt":0.38588414841356705,"score_spread":0.2816416612813014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904288731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9419691,0.018427787,0.000007131953,0.01941826,0.00010833099,0.0011685606,0.000018335244,0.000066737666,0.018815784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758058,0.017720835,0.00023158727,0.005843225,0.00027453364,0.00006508967,0.000004706806,0.000003058265,0.0000511652],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803454,0.00093903055,0.0002938056,0.00022009446,0.00024017038,0.00027236296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908155,0.0002932631,0.00018008884,0.00016350957,0.00020237673,0.00007919841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013221512,0.00009586785,0.00038553067,0.000008080749,0.00021911893,0.000009280662,0.00039029054,0.00005222597,0.000112872614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006279907,0.000048865913,0.00009649953,0.0009941857,0.0018720159,0.000040824023,0.00007055806,0.00013578148,0.00006898993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027569722,0.0002543521,0.021374255,0.00013130577,0.00003218715,0.0000022479594,0.087350376,4.9355435e-7,0.0019563981,0.15791337,0.0043291664,0.7266283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013674656,0.0008102856,0.09989747,0.0010791235,0.000059506925,7.383365e-7,0.107097104,0.0000043215373,0.00012178567,0.031094976,0.75915605,0.00054188684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020138219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005659129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7548269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006258771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000917791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75180894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911382576","doi":"10.1177/0003122418820702","title":"Women in the One Percent: Gender Dynamics in Top Income Positions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Elite; Distribution (mathematics); Household income; Economics; Total personal income; Income distribution; Adjusted gross income; Socioeconomic status; Labour economics; Socioeconomics; Demography; Sociology; Inequality; Gross income; Political science; Geography; Population; Public economics","score_opus":0.04850882440256274,"score_gpt":0.27250940424618997,"score_spread":0.22400057984362723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911382576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9141556,0.021036774,0.000051640007,0.0027623565,0.00006189144,0.00045718555,0.000039737493,0.000018196104,0.061416604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9085084,0.08003394,0.0001662249,0.010953808,0.00003133346,0.000102972925,0.000019887228,0.000010087786,0.00017332048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844474,0.00013741144,0.0005665221,0.00034805934,0.000042467374,0.0004608013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920946,0.00015109417,0.00024596308,0.00033011974,0.00001057089,0.000052764633],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011121249,0.00014068044,0.00077396637,0.00007275814,0.00004414432,0.000017681748,0.00033892132,0.00007290584,0.0006241053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005038639,0.0001108989,0.000128178,0.0005284999,0.00020797367,0.00007347968,0.000058617057,0.0003565127,0.00082621543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010437836,0.0003914689,0.43690178,0.00035846574,0.000026600525,0.000017643111,0.0039876136,0.0000097873235,0.0000024655405,0.54310876,0.00025778593,0.014927192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038925486,0.00024169325,0.8853114,0.00031690998,0.000006037261,0.000007631468,0.0011237588,0.00022166339,8.2892655e-8,0.017655566,0.094317615,0.00040836446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035758308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028283102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5254532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005274772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018198794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920039906","doi":"10.1177/0003122419847165","title":"The Global Increase in the Socioeconomic Achievement Gap, 1964 to 2015","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":301,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Jacobs Foundation; National Academy of Education; Spencer Foundation","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Educational inequality; Academic achievement; Inequality; Psychology; Demographic economics; Educational attainment; Demography; Economic growth; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Economics; Population","score_opus":0.07223707468084947,"score_gpt":0.43501871927249225,"score_spread":0.36278164459164275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920039906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5243614,0.015060302,0.0000049783703,0.43834093,0.0002251084,0.00071755354,0.00001329965,0.000010878507,0.02126559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88364214,0.031947132,0.000082520484,0.08319146,0.0003135137,0.0002327312,0.0000075459347,0.0000021482122,0.0005808368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980117,0.0010399696,0.0002716932,0.0001808997,0.00022239545,0.00027334446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987354,0.0008838943,0.000105367195,0.00014549895,0.00006493717,0.000064875036],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002805738,0.000089383226,0.00022886906,0.000005290211,0.00044208742,0.00003352424,0.00044201192,0.000023440849,0.00028785423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075065537,0.000043528747,0.00011161292,0.00016908823,0.0005200588,0.000025209161,0.000068893874,0.00011410465,0.0013251037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014252724,0.00011126967,0.0722704,0.000028029137,0.000036959194,6.219867e-7,0.0034746113,0.0000047807093,0.000002523856,0.765282,0.14287858,0.015895963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032858497,0.0000808781,0.084680736,0.0000432751,0.000008821939,2.7672957e-7,0.011021509,6.855772e-7,6.412481e-8,0.010011781,0.89402324,0.00009584872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031233898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011671087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75527024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028706543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015604547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921085129","doi":"10.1177/0003122419833601","title":"Scaling Down Inequality: Rating Scales, Gender Bias, and the Architecture of Evaluation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":202,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Scale (ratio); Rating scale; Psychology; Gender bias; Gender inequality; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Developmental psychology; Mathematics; Geography","score_opus":0.21463274344937525,"score_gpt":0.38961479717809017,"score_spread":0.17498205372871492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921085129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91976905,0.051729508,0.0004960177,0.01033181,0.00008358051,0.0014205723,0.000010176834,0.000040565737,0.016118733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96588844,0.02939971,0.0003919803,0.004220418,0.000056844976,0.00001325476,0.0000069930015,0.0000024946496,0.000019834739],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942163,0.0045179864,0.0003197113,0.00023058707,0.0005070507,0.0002083455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765253,0.001581933,0.00037348107,0.00018368551,0.00014251733,0.0000658585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010794449,0.000096184325,0.0004918287,0.000013196465,0.00026346272,0.000017218037,0.00018661171,0.00005863808,0.00034479244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040501864,0.00005485775,0.00015113773,0.00026298806,0.00185225,0.00005223933,0.000102608465,0.00021807243,0.000021136657],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067583795,0.00008741033,0.08597258,0.0012183065,0.00014120176,8.3509656e-7,0.032324377,0.000036711317,0.00007446246,0.1357495,0.0009545038,0.7433725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060152365,0.0007676771,0.39565834,0.0032931266,0.0016579258,0.000010583675,0.20260482,0.0007655802,0.000032144646,0.21233042,0.1747185,0.002145636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091939594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024179606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74122685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041457864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000087636785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6824692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921811651","doi":"10.1177/0003122419833386","title":"Low-Income Black Mothers Parenting Adolescents in the Mass Incarceration Era: The Long Reach of Criminalization","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; College of Humanities and Social Sciences, United Arab Emirates University; National Institutes of Health; North Carolina State University","keywords":"Criminalization; Mass incarceration; Criminology; Punitive damages; Scrutiny; Juvenile delinquency; Vulnerability (computing); Racialization; Birth certificate; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Prison; Race (biology); Gender studies; Law; Population","score_opus":0.06115774622700883,"score_gpt":0.42807814067354494,"score_spread":0.3669203944465361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921811651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900871,0.0049283155,0.00029106968,0.0012058874,0.000064678025,0.0013666672,0.0000028539077,0.00002002214,0.0020334157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97595406,0.02132973,0.000023353186,0.002438373,0.00008915766,0.00009803204,0.000018212795,0.00001026537,0.000038797312],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99561346,0.0030608915,0.00059661374,0.0001932952,0.00024763827,0.0002880843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983845,0.000655771,0.0005593216,0.00026890245,0.000102524275,0.000029031153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019679558,0.00012415144,0.00062025065,0.000017687087,0.00020801308,0.0000065257555,0.0003181442,0.000089047324,0.00019537726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046777926,0.000060702965,0.00011312892,0.00036123357,0.00034955807,0.000050516857,0.000054960514,0.0005186201,0.00011569398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012151211,0.000059282494,0.9480118,0.002704546,0.0000123084,0.0000011895752,0.0203253,0.000008087493,0.000047273017,0.0023407978,0.000061340266,0.026415914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019040976,0.00009102155,0.91741335,0.0052450146,0.000043151595,4.950223e-8,0.07566315,0.00010301969,0.0000023241714,0.00054067286,0.00058031053,0.00012750406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050069636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011499028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055337854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081744496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060415634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2475395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921908988","doi":"10.1177/0003122419832497","title":"Measuring Automatic Cognition: Advancing Dual-Process Research in Sociology","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Duke University","keywords":"Misattribution of memory; Cognition; Dual (grammatical number); Empirical research; Implicit-association test; Psychology; Process (computing); Dual process theory (moral psychology); Social cognition; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Morality; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.22317833368139087,"score_gpt":0.5069527000832538,"score_spread":0.28377436640186293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921908988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8559679,0.019780194,0.00001146563,0.015272547,0.0003179345,0.000906623,0.0000019406964,0.00014322995,0.10759816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95333564,0.03896962,0.00012437618,0.0069412105,0.00025984965,0.00018421185,0.000005498037,0.00001171863,0.00016789255],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943014,0.003371901,0.00047036033,0.00048887834,0.0004593198,0.00090813386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743265,0.0018045706,0.0001972302,0.00019466832,0.00021847912,0.00015237369],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054574604,0.00015012942,0.00075118523,0.00008363998,0.00032734853,0.000014093246,0.00039006092,0.00017874205,0.0022592412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023172481,0.00012312297,0.00015936965,0.0008789777,0.003936132,0.00012736148,0.00008195711,0.0007733352,0.0015421268],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079386846,0.0008658175,0.107471,0.002786812,0.00018117006,0.00015922358,0.06861827,0.0000034127559,0.001008928,0.09708213,0.01432819,0.70741564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018700717,0.0026559236,0.13216415,0.010761954,0.0001193385,0.000027203441,0.25602508,0.000051899002,0.000018281391,0.30492055,0.28930202,0.0020835395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004054719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008828945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7053321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026416473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019647875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957755297","doi":"10.1177/0003122419856347","title":"Does Immigration Reduce the Support for Welfare Spending? A Cautionary Tale on Spatial Panel Data Analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; York University","keywords":"German; Immigration; Conceptualization; Welfare; Context (archaeology); Unemployment; Panel data; Demographic economics; Welfare state; Economics; Panel analysis; Ethnic group; Diversity (politics); Political science; Development economics; Geography; Econometrics; Economic growth; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.06623592497601985,"score_gpt":0.3899737775444524,"score_spread":0.32373785256843257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957755297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58693093,0.018334227,0.023830015,0.28732732,0.0031747285,0.018321818,0.0023551257,0.00079559436,0.05893026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681075,0.025335487,0.00035190964,0.0024541605,0.00037547312,0.00013546913,0.0017350583,0.0000071056656,0.0014977913],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978311,0.00065937894,0.0003781975,0.000500414,0.0003643046,0.00026659196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984182,0.00046441497,0.0003717201,0.0005666969,0.00010481162,0.00007413528],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001745826,0.00014988013,0.00045935437,0.00003845601,0.0005942683,0.00004727623,0.0006026261,0.00007913241,0.0023363112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010555312,0.000068852074,0.00027720258,0.00052451197,0.0005466238,0.00016618603,0.000054035165,0.00015990672,0.00013076728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019018471,0.00056199514,0.073016465,0.00039193153,0.0010664325,0.000003007845,0.01070254,0.000021627011,0.0002981729,0.35310954,0.0764222,0.48421592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008457131,0.0003452171,0.033053946,0.000071985734,0.00045537832,3.986096e-7,0.0047021005,0.00023478529,0.0000063056837,0.0010385577,0.95978886,0.00021786914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025440159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035062984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8833667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010836591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010636085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033086507","doi":"10.1177/0003122420920647","title":"Elaborating on the Abstract: Group Meaning-Making in a Colombian Microsavings Program","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Islamic Finance and Banking Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Preference; Odds; Financial services; Dissemination; Public relations; Process (computing); Meaning (existential); Marketing; Business; Sociology; Economics; Finance; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.043570819377613375,"score_gpt":0.2977603227844217,"score_spread":0.25418950340680835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033086507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.859326,0.010738562,0.000015822825,0.09889969,0.00010442802,0.0018512856,0.0000028507209,0.00043422898,0.028627139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8843231,0.00298448,0.0002149361,0.11196237,0.0003259901,0.00016467995,0.000006482666,0.000013475703,0.0000044496132],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986977,0.000036378515,0.0003740777,0.00035515847,0.00016915203,0.0003675078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991334,0.0002441135,0.00043083966,0.00013378746,0.00005354084,0.000004327807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005913992,0.0002066645,0.0005183667,0.000020909654,0.00022879372,0.00009378206,0.00033332605,0.000040558887,0.00008918819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014333572,0.00012246903,0.00012655776,0.00083412573,0.00039119137,0.0001420361,0.00017155208,0.00042472166,0.00023193164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026463053,0.00021165467,0.017708769,0.0013515393,0.000039970215,0.00005943603,0.0005638665,0.0000025796312,0.00021771147,0.16850922,0.021723244,0.78958553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004863641,0.00055060897,0.19615468,0.008852936,0.00014517563,0.0000019368103,0.0019892205,0.00023835144,0.0000040871396,0.008480487,0.7819939,0.0011022132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006985806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017640543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7884833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031425654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010177222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49941427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080130437","doi":"10.1177/0003122420948510","title":"Exogenous Shocks, the Criminal Elite, and Increasing Gender Inequality in Chicago Organized Crime","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute of Justice; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Organised crime; Inequality; Restructuring; Elite; Hoarding (animal behavior); Criminology; Power (physics); Enforcement; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.11636108749840054,"score_gpt":0.36788645318729285,"score_spread":0.2515253656888923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080130437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88891286,0.08708523,0.00007563345,0.014319186,0.000037863418,0.00052168826,0.00001411609,0.000081195525,0.008952258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8069005,0.16861331,0.00018903933,0.024037555,0.00021240627,0.000020633086,0.000003114124,0.000008492848,0.000014959406],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964427,0.0020599095,0.00037184093,0.00038327265,0.00032687566,0.0004154002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980035,0.0013265603,0.0002514236,0.00017346574,0.000054712036,0.00019038253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018035161,0.00017663525,0.00064185273,0.000009562562,0.00037368847,0.00004117841,0.0003420108,0.000073538526,0.00028215343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005703523,0.00011355457,0.00010873698,0.00047244714,0.0016935183,0.00009663461,0.00012908908,0.0004206345,0.000023255052],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003305655,0.00048483725,0.18923825,0.0018486393,0.0001540676,0.00009095898,0.17094114,0.0000010526888,0.0014152547,0.060516685,0.00865846,0.56632006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044954242,0.0002767324,0.6357012,0.00045643744,0.00019730326,0.000012988689,0.036014263,0.000009958285,0.000010777277,0.0028028288,0.3233399,0.00072809187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008290804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015581326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.565592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010504398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016433554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99831307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102828640","doi":"10.1177/0003122420971805","title":"Hiring and Intra-occupational Gender Segregation in Software Engineering","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subspecialty; Quality assurance; Occupational segregation; Software quality analyst; Software; Competence (human resources); Software quality assurance; Quality (philosophy); Software development; Psychology; Software quality; Computer science; Business; Political science; Marketing; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0593091350481467,"score_gpt":0.3162425071475056,"score_spread":0.2569333720993589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102828640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87586504,0.04313493,0.020558834,0.03747788,0.00012596232,0.0015897456,0.000021269736,0.0004975443,0.020728763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97271514,0.020523686,0.0015356137,0.0051375744,0.000048706977,0.000022242637,0.000011537043,0.0000027452506,0.000002738732],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994191,0.000071578674,0.00017457429,0.00012114165,0.00008037632,0.00013325864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996433,0.00017656744,0.00005459731,0.000025377432,0.000015888305,0.00008421768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027223467,0.000059744154,0.00017598674,0.000010932474,0.00005931368,0.000019584888,0.0000616419,0.00002975074,0.00007299452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077579165,0.00005252823,0.000035119076,0.0002008279,0.00017157526,0.00021329311,0.000012305773,0.00010109142,0.000021018996],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007920489,0.000017580633,0.045848455,0.00035700947,0.000011810555,0.0000023836167,0.0042404965,0.00005915552,0.0000032124963,0.05427096,0.00033504254,0.89484596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066070515,0.0003122719,0.49806952,0.0015361462,0.000062479456,0.0000032322803,0.0048660426,0.00091032975,0.000008089693,0.00836621,0.48406687,0.0011380861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028759465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005363556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8937079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039518127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003458776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21420391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112405903","doi":"10.1177/0003122420969399","title":"Statistical Discrimination and the Rationalization of Stereotypes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"McGill University; University of Toronto; York University; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete","keywords":"Rationalization (economics); Statistical discrimination; Rationality; Psychology; Social psychology; Reading (process); Employment discrimination; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.0837732883235165,"score_gpt":0.41970707718903616,"score_spread":0.33593378886551967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112405903","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050917294,0.10601485,0.0651071,0.71114016,0.0001469956,0.0035554147,0.00008939525,0.0001565582,0.06287223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90249264,0.0918656,0.00037982254,0.0050610485,0.00007028574,0.000027799724,0.000021754026,0.0000024839335,0.00007854715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981822,0.0010491172,0.00020697483,0.00012639844,0.00033247654,0.00010286097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987069,0.00088478276,0.0001335238,0.00005051123,0.00014489588,0.000079407306],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096650555,0.000048835576,0.00022734904,0.000009562861,0.00020274766,0.000023966522,0.00012990559,0.000020765794,0.00040288846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063037393,0.000028728637,0.00004493278,0.00021753945,0.003015644,0.00006925448,0.000043312855,0.000076795004,0.000012839223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001835542,0.000019523255,0.0053691864,0.00023348058,0.000008771061,4.1799456e-7,0.0021675245,2.5768907e-7,0.0000047592016,0.9409337,0.0046156077,0.04662842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002781957,0.0010493846,0.35814482,0.00078912906,0.00068015954,0.0000020917885,0.041346673,0.0007711769,0.000013694684,0.21429428,0.3792941,0.0008325344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030235114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030047526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8515754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001625189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006820809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138838551","doi":"10.1177/0003122421996323","title":"Creative Destruction: The Structural Consequences of Scientific Curation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Expansive; Citation; Bridging (networking); Scholarly communication; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Data science; Computer science; Political science; Library science; Publishing","score_opus":0.650926118561627,"score_gpt":0.6181973579764589,"score_spread":0.03272876058516805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138838551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8878226,0.091179416,0.001012089,0.014097418,0.0004560415,0.0003687973,0.00003842232,0.00001878383,0.0050064093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747725,0.022595515,0.0012313827,0.0008435869,0.000043138352,0.000014977851,0.000008909045,0.0000024182655,0.00048758087],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938306,0.0013525486,0.00069519103,0.0005547974,0.0032816716,0.00028518643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898624,0.004981921,0.00063675223,0.0006367256,0.0037363616,0.00014585961],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0105431415,0.00010567275,0.0005012617,0.0012383289,0.00043102476,0.0005007637,0.0011787177,0.000039154696,0.0020498259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07246839,0.000046897174,0.00024161565,0.07471401,0.0060364045,0.00026111305,0.0003098041,0.00022576365,0.00009879558],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064621886,0.00003403188,0.034455348,0.00003860641,0.00002750768,0.000012133299,0.00013581985,0.0000043443597,0.0027390285,0.023331072,0.009021713,0.93019396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003114314,0.0007475044,0.5699777,0.00034913592,0.000086692686,0.00018382906,0.0073877657,0.00034738256,0.004781699,0.23857199,0.1767032,0.00055169116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042502263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000028319148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92964226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004936737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000375553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99886245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164909796","doi":"10.1177/00031224211011981","title":"How Legacies of Geopolitical Trauma Shape Popular Nationalism Today","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Geopolitics; Pride; Argument (complex analysis); Political economy; Political science; Democracy; Sociology; Gender studies; Development economics; Politics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.06587824589119659,"score_gpt":0.37711028887736575,"score_spread":0.31123204298616913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164909796","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20187272,0.42488468,0.0003153812,0.26684353,0.00042278986,0.000661945,0.000102250764,0.00015254506,0.10474414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82157993,0.16676167,0.0011758854,0.005187161,0.00032895515,0.00003161906,0.000049280854,0.000007490925,0.0048779906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981712,0.0006533312,0.00027941016,0.00022566265,0.00037543662,0.00029496767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987798,0.0005584557,0.0001533923,0.00015396636,0.00021608711,0.0001383146],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005693624,0.00010422659,0.00048230126,0.000014786298,0.00028851387,0.000026860564,0.00019236276,0.00009483469,0.0013990642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027711247,0.000078145385,0.00030201627,0.0003584642,0.0021349357,0.00008277062,0.000056042853,0.00021750912,0.000016033013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.291385e-7,0.000063289524,0.00083240157,0.00012316229,0.000027675147,0.000008387211,0.0010094132,2.0747228e-7,0.000010444082,0.94884557,0.004271683,0.044806965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000933584,0.00007300505,0.011336539,0.00034376766,0.000083841034,0.0000064623955,0.010437723,0.000005819959,0.0000067369942,0.032743275,0.9446577,0.00021177385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036419363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053566167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.940386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006997322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001875269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196760043","doi":"10.1177/00031224211032906","title":"Discipline and Empower: The State Governance of Migrant Domestic Workers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"State (computer science); Corporate governance; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Political science; Migrant workers; Sociology; Punishment (psychology); Economic growth; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.020045606066976505,"score_gpt":0.36013925516320466,"score_spread":0.34009364909622813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196760043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6867449,0.23987508,0.00037894098,0.068920694,0.00009782585,0.00042258803,0.000046326,0.00004283088,0.0034708108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55455935,0.44096133,0.0002817269,0.003268713,0.000023070423,0.0000114636905,0.0000042205947,0.0000028239174,0.0008872998],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998769,0.0005116071,0.00021829965,0.00015586027,0.00018518782,0.00016003815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989728,0.0005305688,0.00021053528,0.00013730994,0.00007868032,0.0000701562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062557665,0.00007184177,0.00030004827,0.0000027967178,0.00015218079,0.0000124435555,0.00014221857,0.000021740461,0.00021724339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011852133,0.00003957847,0.00008418467,0.00037932157,0.0017259034,0.000026825086,0.000050349994,0.00011970492,0.000007119028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034121724,0.0002878299,0.05684247,0.0006918894,0.00016312372,0.00006038475,0.043451834,0.000025778225,0.00014549759,0.13037504,0.020644385,0.7472776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015293017,0.00011471423,0.08169304,0.0008063924,0.000084926454,0.0000042688325,0.010757665,0.000052233885,0.0000015399495,0.0042933943,0.9017883,0.00025057493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037578793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010368276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8811439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024367282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011765056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6359163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200791192","doi":"10.1177/00031224211041094","title":"College and the “Culture War”: Assessing Higher Education’s Influence on Moral Attitudes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Relativism; Morality; Moral disengagement; Politics; Moral relativism; Moral development; Socialization; Social psychology; Moral psychology; Liberal arts education; Sociology; Moral reasoning; Higher education; Social science; Political science; Psychology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.062441036459792224,"score_gpt":0.4420123882401295,"score_spread":0.3795713517803373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200791192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3354977,0.23187926,0.000003837139,0.16242334,0.0008893946,0.0007143492,0.000007939129,0.00012774645,0.2684564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7926891,0.119598925,0.00017869147,0.08438265,0.00031581457,0.00008364077,0.0000036147414,0.0000042437514,0.0027433033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977891,0.0013516461,0.00019392479,0.0002685713,0.00017488514,0.00022190792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989337,0.0005489054,0.00014602525,0.00014301697,0.00013963829,0.000088717505],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057230267,0.00010874993,0.00039291036,0.0000065631143,0.00051349634,0.00003551077,0.00021247019,0.000080077734,0.000558838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011029139,0.000059798214,0.00012239287,0.00033273958,0.0030960646,0.00008232845,0.00005399149,0.00026993614,0.00005856556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015893627,0.00021332056,0.010122571,0.00009011812,0.00005726656,0.000009625076,0.0069382135,1.2467376e-7,0.000033285174,0.8431501,0.07046655,0.06890298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023171413,0.00010239863,0.19678971,0.00060024695,0.00006059111,0.0000048736456,0.015577853,1.2293874e-7,0.000001023247,0.021739054,0.76467013,0.00022226734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021315616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014583227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.821411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006921206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018505513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203417397","doi":"10.1177/00031224211042329","title":"Next Steps for the Relative Education Hypothesis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bachelor; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics; Political science; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.24306122016919002,"score_gpt":0.45880963548828213,"score_spread":0.2157484153190921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203417397","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067467685,0.2983041,0.0017718519,0.6502362,0.0009004134,0.0010153013,0.000026316802,0.000054996668,0.040944036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2629013,0.5694608,0.010724942,0.13049386,0.0025552018,0.0017552753,0.00006345189,0.000012716261,0.022032421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882394,0.00050182146,0.00019432457,0.00016679948,0.0001559295,0.0001571608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956721,0.003621727,0.00012521457,0.00010012435,0.0004352549,0.000045597062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007577007,0.00006955751,0.00020328499,0.0000053657773,0.0007382124,0.000024377177,0.00013730633,0.000026460655,0.0004801203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007245408,0.000041207782,0.00017794974,0.00021509208,0.0006550794,0.00007221836,0.00002467478,0.00008028556,0.000075653945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025682132,0.00008649771,0.0002979271,0.000046324163,0.00006299777,1.1946763e-7,0.0018720778,3.2148253e-7,0.000010062067,0.6979938,0.11128571,0.1883416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015494597,0.00002485183,0.003799623,0.00009449997,0.000054794473,4.2037948e-7,0.011126732,9.790259e-7,0.0000032742873,0.031019278,0.95378196,0.00007806403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023690671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008601042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8424963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008916279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055764103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86739534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322736134","doi":"10.1177/00031224221150433","title":"Not in My Schoolyard: Disability Discrimination in Educational Access","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Canada Research Chairs; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Notre Dame; Northwestern University; Harvard University; McGill University; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Disadvantage; Race (biology); Psychology; Gatekeeping; Inclusion (mineral); Audit; Inequality; Social psychology; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.1484099792978272,"score_gpt":0.49597590393405505,"score_spread":0.3475659246362278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322736134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82517046,0.0010717862,0.0000068179506,0.16096368,0.00012877707,0.00081202865,0.0000068074496,0.00006687295,0.011772803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700883,0.02784414,0.000043120534,0.0014215476,0.00010263969,0.00020669539,0.0000483924,0.0000036410777,0.00024152554],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771357,0.0010082584,0.00036107647,0.00033512845,0.00030077554,0.00028118622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987129,0.00089842017,0.00011254472,0.00015482721,0.000040460105,0.000080866695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001924771,0.0000869109,0.00031165293,0.000035602596,0.00012980534,0.00003770949,0.00031435996,0.00005279214,0.000667538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003010637,0.000059627153,0.000094661904,0.0012317346,0.0022266514,0.00027148085,0.00007395136,0.0001799151,0.00015757939],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001029264,0.00040564453,0.72480416,0.00025481015,0.0000047423314,0.0000018592551,0.002926824,0.000009579029,0.000008474444,0.08213428,0.0025367746,0.18690258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063059255,0.000017031598,0.9537716,0.00017441611,0.000004991175,6.877236e-8,0.0024329266,0.000008316053,5.563791e-7,0.03317137,0.01025675,0.00009894878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005569679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025858453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22896743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028863447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013159499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84197265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372348656","doi":"10.1177/00031224231169790","title":"Guns versus Climate: How Militarization Amplifies the Effect of Economic Growth on Carbon Emissions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Militarization; Scholarship; Counterfactual thinking; Economics; Moderation; Environmental sociology; Politics; Climate change; Political economy; Sociology; Development economics; Political science; Economic growth; Social science; Ecology","score_opus":0.039739343768019686,"score_gpt":0.27426164461723623,"score_spread":0.23452230084921655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372348656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94587475,0.017503642,0.00003987612,0.01132048,0.00052020466,0.00082492153,0.0002076553,0.00014526419,0.023563217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8679373,0.13109086,0.000037091908,0.00052436127,0.000076955796,0.00015020547,0.00006662929,0.000023935476,0.000092636896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998286,0.00019607105,0.00058684096,0.00051435624,0.000038267743,0.00037848225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974297,0.0013081887,0.0006762104,0.00049554004,0.000005985251,0.00008434764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012747209,0.00023529932,0.00093852595,0.000071590985,0.00012377473,0.000014302874,0.00038921656,0.00008794881,0.00016460595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010412055,0.00017013203,0.00030103017,0.00024508894,0.0005928471,0.00005240502,0.00013910102,0.000207017,0.0006105216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031276504,0.00014338765,0.34318706,0.0017205037,0.0006416995,0.000008211759,0.00038892016,0.0010386432,0.00012880335,0.6135483,0.017566286,0.021315424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005665449,0.014767903,0.69343424,0.0018615149,0.00054516,0.000008192338,0.0011522121,0.004921062,0.0007817776,0.041771453,0.23132108,0.0037699756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001080186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000038024718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5717768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020612848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009927918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7847223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385252406","doi":"10.1177/00031224231184264","title":"Taking the Time: The Implications of Workplace Assessment for Organizational Gender Inequality","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Workload; Task (project management); Inequality; Gender inequality; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Applied psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.267218071661934,"score_gpt":0.44715207045088806,"score_spread":0.17993399878895405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385252406","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07131533,0.013351426,0.033444192,0.7558579,0.00036754666,0.0067351745,0.00047953203,0.0006066789,0.11784222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97446585,0.015384492,0.00062695803,0.009021712,0.000109743705,0.000096764175,0.000056220393,0.0000045168504,0.00023375291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980292,0.00109551,0.00026283506,0.00016375406,0.00023715336,0.00021155526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700433,0.0021600302,0.0003809762,0.0002137437,0.00019822057,0.000042712763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00418155,0.00006803159,0.00022983339,0.000008355245,0.00086664606,0.000015143022,0.00048278307,0.000036857135,0.0008127187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024662632,0.00003602291,0.00013718678,0.0008523649,0.0010739174,0.000034210807,0.00011349923,0.000120139885,0.000060874463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005367417,0.00010614957,0.06828782,0.00024680418,0.00012863122,2.0545697e-7,0.007680265,0.000017731472,0.00006652491,0.7993301,0.080552764,0.043577634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010431518,0.000065258944,0.76575065,0.00007511969,0.00013674622,3.1549249e-7,0.016011173,0.000029184272,0.0000018110886,0.040989336,0.17664662,0.00018945207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013172842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000087742455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9031505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006316869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001797511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385886422","doi":"10.1177/000312240006500407","title":"Core Networks and Tie Activation: What Kinds of Routine Networks Allocate Resources in Nonroutine Situations?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Interpersonal ties; Resource (disambiguation); Strong ties; Diversity (politics); Affect (linguistics); Social network (sociolinguistics); Business; Personal network; Core network; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Computer network; Telecommunications; Communication; Social media; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.06097434078276182,"score_gpt":0.35177127088154847,"score_spread":0.29079693009878665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385886422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75995994,0.21201368,0.00042105324,0.015615722,0.00013281885,0.001021886,0.00000245156,0.00011665124,0.010715788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6182848,0.37810212,0.00005937892,0.0030970166,0.00027320455,0.000030808493,0.000014754221,0.000006337138,0.00013156745],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787384,0.0006357471,0.0004937961,0.00032063006,0.00024970758,0.00042628628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848604,0.00084715354,0.00029667854,0.00015303475,0.00007549755,0.00014157443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011335841,0.00017648922,0.00067797094,0.000023431177,0.00026300177,0.00004223896,0.00023982226,0.00017133258,0.00082342123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031350367,0.00014057725,0.00012903819,0.00087937515,0.0018656674,0.00022216247,0.00005416856,0.00036571076,0.000008854286],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004803771,0.00009020971,0.0082942145,0.000043181408,0.000027061746,0.0000043014625,0.00434545,0.00035207366,0.0000012703931,0.0029798856,0.0011855378,0.98262876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023621353,0.0022214954,0.40951437,0.012715658,0.00044163354,0.000012807853,0.056452543,0.007046017,0.0000027407298,0.013790263,0.492541,0.002899339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008418849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001472747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9797294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067462504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038538154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9015885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385886517","doi":"10.1177/000312240306800502","title":"Space Meets Time: Integrating Temporal and Contextual Influences on Mental Health in Early Adulthood","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Life course approach; Mental health; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Bivariate analysis; Developmental psychology; Socioeconomic status; Formative assessment; Social environment; Disadvantage; Everyday life; Social psychology; Demography; Sociology; Geography; Population","score_opus":0.03895020055560708,"score_gpt":0.36521190119478325,"score_spread":0.32626170063917614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385886517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6854885,0.18434107,0.000031693,0.08590942,0.00015804805,0.0019124552,0.000033406253,0.00018464695,0.04194071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8805174,0.10892044,0.00054577197,0.009745602,0.000038478327,0.000037236077,0.0000046684004,0.0000056305494,0.00018476282],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970325,0.0016339158,0.00038431794,0.00032602847,0.00024434348,0.00037886738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987506,0.0006552409,0.0002929795,0.00008927322,0.000051938758,0.00015994498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015042451,0.00016802704,0.0006680403,0.000030751115,0.00046028098,0.00002875501,0.00012636097,0.000051634564,0.00011253718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023057444,0.00011582554,0.000079497935,0.00037546107,0.0013831948,0.00009350245,0.000026974267,0.00024194407,0.000052024512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045571156,0.00036571277,0.38113582,0.00020756743,0.00010234646,0.000010849161,0.08424139,4.1048222e-7,0.000021099919,0.20991956,0.025094764,0.29885492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009540198,0.0026917963,0.1015079,0.003163536,0.000031360232,0.0000042548427,0.076149136,0.000007800717,0.0000033435965,0.0029779412,0.811632,0.0008769433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018634258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028583317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78653723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012182638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014439976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5096439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385886563","doi":"10.1177/000312240106600601","title":"Nations of Joiners: Explaining Voluntary Association Membership in Democratic Societies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Victoria; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntary association; Democracy; Voluntarism (philosophy); Polity; Turnover; Politics; Multilevel model; Association (psychology); Political science; Demographic economics; Development economics; Economics; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.04732151941889556,"score_gpt":0.36191683860553364,"score_spread":0.3145953191866381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385886563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7184221,0.08564223,0.00008508325,0.029451966,0.00029398617,0.0009745435,0.0000077388695,0.00017926033,0.16494305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76159203,0.23250669,0.00034383705,0.0041574966,0.00023464055,0.000068322435,0.000011163457,0.00000669706,0.0010791343],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766886,0.000969597,0.00041498142,0.00018999889,0.00038273883,0.00037380986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974646,0.001840335,0.00041554467,0.000084167856,0.000112707865,0.00008267311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020397725,0.00011129617,0.0005273474,0.000039136212,0.00026316967,0.0000108474505,0.0002019851,0.00012345069,0.00051444944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035802824,0.00009495696,0.00020796189,0.001070371,0.0006886277,0.00012433404,0.00003544527,0.00026511148,0.000025357334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029929191,0.00039538834,0.6175074,0.00045837768,0.00017144109,0.00002036823,0.051530506,0.000016715421,0.00003082886,0.045074437,0.113422155,0.17134248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012817931,0.0010954513,0.31275225,0.005923405,0.00051349757,0.000004654171,0.28070652,0.00014995915,0.0000072925172,0.13997003,0.25552773,0.0020674306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006253399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046571594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30475515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036677136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011121974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56328607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385886581","doi":"10.1177/000312240106600305","title":"Intellectualization and Art World Development: Film in the United States","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Cinema and Media Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Harvard University","keywords":"Entertainment; Ideology; Art world; Intellectualization; Institutionalisation; Perception; Sociology; Film studies; Aesthetics; Media studies; Political science; Art; Visual arts; Psychology; Movie theater; Art history; Politics; Performance art; Law","score_opus":0.07780125865661522,"score_gpt":0.28974749721197707,"score_spread":0.21194623855536185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385886581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4982093,0.40641385,0.002213336,0.037206475,0.00012096828,0.0010384885,0.000015521724,0.00007672625,0.054705333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2481891,0.7276186,0.00026826633,0.022830524,0.000028844606,0.0000931522,0.00008511332,0.0000058502023,0.0008805739],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992623,0.00005696814,0.00033598384,0.00017027745,0.000020149986,0.00015435828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993769,0.00036133383,0.00013835586,0.00008467408,0.000011996283,0.000026747683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052789034,0.000085233754,0.0003580269,0.00007296873,0.000060017774,0.000009689526,0.00009314321,0.0000152203165,0.00029958665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064233167,0.000055836917,0.000031881813,0.0007079192,0.00022684346,0.000022145305,0.000034066663,0.00010324915,0.0001895157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025801057,0.00027896927,0.5501539,0.0005512127,0.000115580566,0.00002738617,0.014704261,0.0000144821925,9.3601807e-7,0.08986275,0.19823053,0.14603415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065199594,0.000035082885,0.040755454,0.00010178634,0.000003265938,0.0000022042211,0.00046874274,0.000033155295,1.5260495e-7,0.002266633,0.9561812,0.00008711447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044883156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004670966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75795066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025425461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000050737926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32802638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385886658","doi":"10.1177/000312240206700403","title":"The Impact of Incarceration on Wage Mobility and Inequality","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":177,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Earnings; National Longitudinal Surveys; Inequality; Demographic economics; Prison; Wage; Quarter (Canadian coin); Argument (complex analysis); Life course approach; Social mobility; Ethnic group; Economics; Survey data collection; Unemployment; Labour economics; Psychology; Sociology; Criminology; Social psychology; Economic growth; Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.16565878573055612,"score_gpt":0.48521003903789345,"score_spread":0.31955125330733736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385886658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95742434,0.0187906,0.00003352651,0.0041078813,0.000014122453,0.00031564815,0.000012937376,0.000019228528,0.019281741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.908638,0.090782076,0.000008546888,0.00040734533,0.000028531165,0.000017588527,0.0000013540188,0.0000013850959,0.000115176445],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859357,0.00083439576,0.00021999792,0.00011627004,0.00010957413,0.00012620338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909925,0.00051771494,0.00015086103,0.00013363227,0.000046549543,0.00005195937],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011670191,0.000056707766,0.00021076176,0.0000051451316,0.00026670055,0.0000136586405,0.00010701988,0.00002288187,0.0012126062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011295262,0.000028623295,0.00019273555,0.000114489674,0.0011972403,0.00003073544,0.000026435871,0.00009997538,0.00001946287],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072185667,0.00030923303,0.04597898,0.00007621053,0.000041552285,4.873837e-7,0.0018215353,6.258811e-7,0.000035265966,0.014838484,0.021269783,0.9156206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001452305,0.001835354,0.936548,0.000515398,0.000046943936,6.240231e-7,0.0022201934,0.00010787494,0.000004964801,0.004048387,0.054290276,0.00023677983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024521896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055812845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9153839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054057702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009147668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388945268","doi":"10.1177/00031224231209445","title":"Trojan Horse Technologies: Smuggling Criminal-Legal Logics into Healthcare Practice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Social and Economic Sciences; Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University; York University; Saint Louis University; Harvard University; Brown University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Trojan horse; Law enforcement; Health care; Guard (computer science); Public relations; Enforcement; Work (physics); Field (mathematics); Criminology; Political science; Law; Business; Psychology; Computer security; Engineering","score_opus":0.06481253435977477,"score_gpt":0.44367150218243173,"score_spread":0.37885896782265693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388945268","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062191844,0.48678267,0.002003112,0.29376614,0.06556029,0.00500414,0.00011847284,0.012112256,0.072461076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6625715,0.2333583,0.0171103,0.08148386,0.002970069,0.0012665752,0.00022523443,0.00021129097,0.00080287154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939541,0.0014839696,0.0011465098,0.0013591326,0.0005216191,0.0015346362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952313,0.0019315018,0.0010306583,0.0013067011,0.00020796605,0.00029188115],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002618358,0.00060850393,0.0015083972,0.00017387206,0.00042702898,0.000043219774,0.0010939329,0.00038430787,0.00032057028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052039046,0.000474368,0.00044891413,0.0024932495,0.0016514543,0.00018495793,0.00037094287,0.0015161012,0.0038457552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012900926,0.00024196647,0.0013701599,0.00075788354,0.0002053563,0.00046199196,0.0014455939,0.0000018523311,0.00004770443,0.057073716,0.5338951,0.40436968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004046009,0.0022459386,0.0031296236,0.0010879381,0.00030627687,0.0002365379,0.042749718,0.000009869865,0.0000018255523,0.007997102,0.940959,0.0008715959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040444636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014573602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60037965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025415176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012219432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389791824","doi":"10.1177/00031224231214288","title":"Tokenism and Its Long-Term Consequences: Evidence from the Literary Field","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; Harvard University","keywords":"Tokenism; Stringer; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Engineering; Anthropology","score_opus":0.13413215634591222,"score_gpt":0.41853879517769943,"score_spread":0.2844066388317872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389791824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64625204,0.2649218,0.0000062159406,0.08688377,0.00014378165,0.00044359887,0.000016503776,0.00018051478,0.0011517224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5058657,0.47796127,0.000019470375,0.015628736,0.00019004304,0.00004033329,0.000009208904,0.0000025868208,0.0002826254],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830276,0.00073498714,0.00019779083,0.00025288633,0.00022686155,0.0002847202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964594,0.0031368088,0.00012536129,0.000113453556,0.00005525052,0.000109678665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052699685,0.00011202689,0.0003114337,0.0000049974155,0.000542031,0.000052784893,0.00038198082,0.00007442709,0.00039165976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028767618,0.000060188388,0.00012082219,0.00044398016,0.001451359,0.00012604005,0.000109151944,0.00021804743,0.00021370605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015412596,0.00002669652,0.11443689,0.00021323402,0.000085547035,0.000089700225,0.030983977,1.2063188e-7,0.0002052119,0.023024896,0.023151562,0.80776674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023356787,0.00062636397,0.7877218,0.008884518,0.00034570572,0.000008500105,0.02188955,0.000024363753,0.000014259218,0.06399792,0.11496631,0.0012871443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084532326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000115414325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80647963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028163706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006525621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5347593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410450760","doi":"10.1177/00031224251333087","title":"Frame Backfire: The Trouble with Civil Rights Appeals in the Contemporary United States","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Civil rights; Frame (networking); Political science; Law; Political economy; Criminology; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.050714674342801705,"score_gpt":0.35649512454922794,"score_spread":0.30578045020642625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410450760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04726818,0.20880575,0.00016448257,0.34331313,0.00010117113,0.0018049668,0.000017742446,0.000109065484,0.3984155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87646097,0.07672704,0.000018760236,0.046454884,0.0000561176,0.00014336024,0.000012220415,0.0000015113718,0.00012512018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977891,0.00126216,0.00023722397,0.00019089831,0.00026025102,0.00026037628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980685,0.0015561804,0.0001257885,0.00014293622,0.00007295622,0.000033616725],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013747322,0.000118738986,0.00038169365,0.000018518283,0.00087200815,0.00002900148,0.00045534348,0.000037591995,0.00006558561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038397047,0.000045651544,0.00008890556,0.0012283819,0.004859433,0.000042682314,0.000051277973,0.0002749926,0.00003188872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024432613,0.000101025056,0.010951263,0.000038194805,0.00007925935,0.000012798412,0.002976751,0.0000022240135,3.6034166e-7,0.92614096,0.052280676,0.00739208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008482812,0.000072810646,0.008383355,0.0004290998,0.00002730248,3.5973753e-7,0.008266096,9.962716e-7,9.10185e-8,0.06155994,0.9210864,0.00008876254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01977284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022906712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8688057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005255879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019060995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99784875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416551133","doi":"10.1177/00031224251391760","title":"Shades of <i>Égalité</i> : Educational Mobility and Ethnoracial Hierarchy Over Three Generations in France","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Graduate Center; European University Institute; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Universiteit Utrecht; Sage Foundation; York University; City University of New York","keywords":"Immigration; Social mobility; Educational attainment; Hierarchy; Ethnic group; Narrative; Life course approach","score_opus":0.0493067725743073,"score_gpt":0.4484102961323243,"score_spread":0.399103523558017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416551133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7901984,0.07232827,0.00026495985,0.12590027,0.00023865819,0.0005390755,0.000041133047,0.000018510877,0.010470769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9497886,0.03693424,0.0013154183,0.010708817,0.00023842636,0.00023130463,0.000023801866,0.0000025085874,0.0007569349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986946,0.00038447007,0.0003737856,0.00021632682,0.00017491168,0.00015589882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876267,0.00081775605,0.00011669506,0.00008954802,0.00017218648,0.000041121093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092454173,0.000084994004,0.00032393535,0.00003269032,0.00025556766,0.0000098274895,0.00013177488,0.00004429342,0.00026593998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018205844,0.00006833804,0.000077105426,0.00043065226,0.0015585774,0.00006592488,0.000046178375,0.00012993105,0.0000043296905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004060726,0.00021620079,0.3135477,0.0001708204,0.000025982861,1.02747634e-7,0.0015650623,0.0000033129545,0.000050533723,0.6638625,0.0061184983,0.0144352205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006775674,0.000034995468,0.8234396,0.0003018269,0.00002012749,9.87169e-8,0.00078967493,0.0000073274305,0.0000050175086,0.07740736,0.09779795,0.00012828762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021106289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00152276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58645517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069419286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035459184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57426435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}