{"meta":{"query_hash":"8c742ca9f0c6","filters":{"venue":"American University international law review"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8c742ca9f0c6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=American+University+international+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W122411613","doi":"","title":"Are United States Courts Receptive to International Arbitration","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American University international law review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Arbitration; International arbitration; International law; Political science; Comity; Treaty; Jurisdiction; Sociology","score_opus":0.01985847332322527,"score_gpt":0.24882952795961222,"score_spread":0.22897105463638695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W122411613","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26840362,0.012639359,0.0016735743,0.08450145,0.000671592,0.00006703529,0.00015919417,0.00013665864,0.6317475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976795,0.0017466081,0.000214147,0.011625446,0.00030730187,0.0000328751,0.000057364785,0.000010705706,0.009210507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99038494,0.0031468433,0.00047973773,0.0009043112,0.002793394,0.0022908142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765428,0.012873016,0.0053524156,0.0010733207,0.0027854962,0.001372907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062433383,0.00017431266,0.00024500128,0.0018518901,0.0030364837,0.011518704,0.0013041234,0.0077960123,0.013212175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032118592,0.00036859702,0.0002758716,0.0018318633,0.0047890223,0.00561051,0.0019287999,0.0025716776,0.0018366317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028217054,0.00026416808,0.06255196,0.00030001727,0.00006189727,0.0029937762,0.015046909,0.00048606275,0.002052166,0.6697813,0.12790498,0.1182745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019853302,0.00021545272,0.078749835,0.0018650246,0.0001846253,0.0025040552,0.035348706,0.0022915946,0.0030478125,0.19468169,0.68076277,0.000149833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008024848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00945271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013212175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022671982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004088959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04419911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W146019151","doi":"","title":"Are Hate Speech Provisions Anti-democratic?: An International Perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American University international law review","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Democracy; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.01069265217976472,"score_gpt":0.2668040976850524,"score_spread":0.2561114455052877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W146019151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036802683,0.09941038,0.0010686704,0.231984,0.0020424398,0.00012869749,0.0014481148,0.00008236953,0.62703264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73555994,0.046284456,0.0010441202,0.061625935,0.0010343633,0.00013431402,0.00037471802,0.00009237908,0.1538498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932545,0.0012916058,0.00023836728,0.0008086247,0.0014441232,0.0029629362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98973244,0.005117802,0.0010082992,0.00048290633,0.0029800164,0.0006784614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047294823,0.0008566285,0.0006053742,0.004150633,0.016746014,0.018491497,0.0030105093,0.013691989,0.010883252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00895559,0.0006706461,0.0005548981,0.0048595727,0.015938027,0.006357787,0.00242796,0.009321449,0.00068406475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006441045,0.00006578013,0.0059115742,0.00026976434,0.000039717645,0.00090595044,0.0153006045,0.0003460401,0.00027049184,0.85476935,0.09102547,0.031030744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030918676,0.00007042264,0.057675786,0.002214563,0.0002248527,0.0003480113,0.030445615,0.00050743535,0.0009010913,0.03859013,0.8687218,0.00026930726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91637456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9517168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91637456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062401902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045042988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45275962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497564439","doi":"","title":"Should a Requirement of \"Clean Hands\" Be a Prerequisite to the Exercise of Diplomatic Protection? Human Rights Implications of the International Law Commission's Debate","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American University international law review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"International law; Law; Human rights; Commission; Political science; International human rights law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.04272122580152187,"score_gpt":0.32760903576992156,"score_spread":0.2848878099683997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497564439","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022024697,0.0039924416,0.010391191,0.6241893,0.006416142,0.000097237855,0.00022413635,0.00013584214,0.33252898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5404292,0.0023906408,0.0086332075,0.40517783,0.006543737,0.00040920379,0.00014086787,0.00017105787,0.036104277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799565,0.0049625747,0.001707594,0.003203599,0.005354827,0.004814986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9600807,0.028182553,0.0029205556,0.0031995864,0.0036316847,0.0019850356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029090492,0.0007491159,0.0020013798,0.0017902205,0.00883047,0.015858758,0.0043411986,0.065892905,0.010214645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075730786,0.0012889225,0.002271292,0.0015697066,0.02788498,0.018418109,0.006116499,0.04269894,0.0019030727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034742043,0.00003513743,0.00016045112,0.000050769435,0.000011122687,0.00009242112,0.00052595354,0.00013088023,0.00023005164,0.9843078,0.012049787,0.0023707815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023212036,0.00011384875,0.0024790599,0.0008523191,0.00009736458,0.00046120488,0.0021140464,0.00079281244,0.002033042,0.7991568,0.19147645,0.00019095048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018109871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016872266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065892905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072410093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016298845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1538471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577476899","doi":"","title":"Chopping Away at Chapter 11: The Softwood Lumber Agreement's Effect on the NAFTA Investor-State Dispute Resolution Mechanism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American University international law review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Limiting; Convention; Free trade agreement; Dispute resolution; State (computer science); Agreement; Law; Political science; International trade; Economics; Law and economics; Business; Free trade; Engineering","score_opus":0.013465137272323497,"score_gpt":0.2184184826915601,"score_spread":0.20495334541923663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577476899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08844684,0.0019483364,0.012947132,0.08112793,0.0026557771,0.00037563939,0.00023258165,0.00030354568,0.8119622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7179984,0.0016607363,0.008522517,0.11054864,0.0013023184,0.0006485584,0.00015514427,0.00014332266,0.15902038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9744154,0.0077261725,0.0018166604,0.0026504167,0.0093475245,0.0040437914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96824986,0.023627128,0.0016382637,0.0017929019,0.0041486574,0.0005432256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030422237,0.0005379464,0.00087573886,0.0014675929,0.0083428845,0.013701432,0.0030218556,0.016249113,0.0059690704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036316223,0.000990776,0.0014230297,0.0009798775,0.009438693,0.0049082018,0.0066928035,0.017801872,0.0015301824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004633414,0.00006438351,0.001176274,0.00006372166,0.000016608368,0.0004228801,0.0048116934,0.0004036569,0.0008729297,0.95674163,0.03027492,0.0051048794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027217294,0.00034495804,0.009119913,0.0013741356,0.00031410676,0.0007110653,0.008160342,0.0040811184,0.011113665,0.19846012,0.765641,0.0004075071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05372012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06856497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9462799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00933657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015307154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1608901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591383678","doi":"","title":"Compliance with the Ozone Treaty: Weak States and the Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibility","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American University international law review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; International law; Compliance (psychology); Responsibility to protect; Montreal Protocol; Law; Environmental law; Political science; Law and economics; Ozone; Economics; Physics; Ozone layer; Psychology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.013069345868786938,"score_gpt":0.28257344461823564,"score_spread":0.2695040987494487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591383678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07179848,0.014518786,0.027784742,0.3564367,0.0024520352,0.00015031298,0.00026706027,0.000060543985,0.52653134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8668869,0.006973561,0.0047242655,0.09051915,0.0023701016,0.00032563735,0.00017635008,0.00004947792,0.027974505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9707394,0.011526028,0.0016431944,0.002461558,0.010131028,0.003498643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97167146,0.019847289,0.0027405287,0.0019872126,0.0030745815,0.00067905494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022625625,0.0003782571,0.0011036621,0.0016538264,0.005392068,0.008622287,0.0027971072,0.021157634,0.0027591966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0460602,0.00063397194,0.0019276178,0.002033132,0.015068171,0.0074123857,0.0057219286,0.015872585,0.00036783284],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017385222,0.000020481339,0.00057493895,0.0000481947,0.000029151386,0.000057421454,0.00034770378,0.00048337597,0.00006857998,0.98685247,0.007925181,0.003575194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005591179,0.000035935314,0.0029458976,0.00024391008,0.000063694526,0.00005345178,0.00062715466,0.00068447186,0.00036537208,0.94292384,0.051968526,0.000031775864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018803691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02158717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022625625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042631184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01754826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11965716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W159518068","doi":"","title":"Heated Skirmishes in the Solar Sector: Do Solar-Pv Feed-In Tariffs Constitute Trade-Related Investment Measures and Subsidies Prohibited under the WTO Regime?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American University international law review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Tariff; European union; China; International trade; Photovoltaic system; Allegation; Feed-in tariff; Economics; Business; Electricity; International economics; Political science; Energy policy; Renewable energy; Law; Engineering; Market economy","score_opus":0.015477050124998564,"score_gpt":0.2443047850771141,"score_spread":0.22882773495211553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W159518068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27779448,0.043539368,0.006933821,0.15300477,0.0020887123,0.00015006648,0.0018767606,0.00016782735,0.5144442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93657666,0.009877744,0.0005224148,0.01681282,0.0012751459,0.000042777196,0.00041851733,0.00003188578,0.034442026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985342,0.00042078356,0.000040371287,0.00017470018,0.0005271898,0.00030275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982198,0.0007679838,0.00042441144,0.0001813276,0.00026905446,0.00013738683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025501787,0.0002198012,0.0002462831,0.00064271275,0.0015105128,0.0037733607,0.00076173403,0.0017139545,0.011661993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048495657,0.00024907762,0.0003050469,0.0011863353,0.004229155,0.0024698277,0.0016439713,0.002051547,0.00087717694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035668566,0.00013312325,0.03588047,0.00068297074,0.00004925232,0.0008509279,0.006514806,0.001353539,0.0012381778,0.6898755,0.1193808,0.14368366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006849782,0.00018321128,0.099231035,0.0019808474,0.000059516246,0.0003125342,0.007813534,0.002584711,0.0020109804,0.22120945,0.6644713,0.00007433114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016719082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02476883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016719082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003969895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033766832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039013326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W170120148","doi":"","title":"NAFTA Chapter 19 Binational Panel Reviews - Still a Zero Sum Game: The Wire Rod Decision and its Progeny","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American University international law review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Preamble; Government (linguistics); Law; International law; International trade law; Political science; International trade; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.08435763166106923,"score_gpt":0.24542123389821704,"score_spread":0.16106360223714783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W170120148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072294134,0.033220306,0.0050748936,0.3527959,0.025764279,0.0013981423,0.006757136,0.0008173457,0.56694263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05061055,0.014794707,0.008715453,0.2970407,0.008042032,0.0018021099,0.004203553,0.0004826197,0.6143083],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97681147,0.0028040826,0.0015263527,0.0027137583,0.013399057,0.0027451855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96457446,0.009319746,0.0019805685,0.0012890645,0.021632392,0.0012038238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019392371,0.0009273757,0.0009279245,0.0028834355,0.009537527,0.0107184695,0.003377049,0.025316887,0.01744519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046538312,0.001340556,0.0013651008,0.0027025896,0.0029974435,0.0051236367,0.0017331666,0.0080439905,0.012224871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024861054,0.000023057317,0.0003566118,0.000108806,0.000008138075,0.00021195089,0.00030363488,0.000067778914,0.00046868587,0.041623447,0.9485661,0.008236907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011470438,0.000014278922,0.00093310105,0.0001791143,0.000015894357,0.000056676025,0.000114972114,0.00005301743,0.000286912,0.0026758483,0.99563307,0.000025563651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20404245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30036697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20404245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018535562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037444804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40570956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W195506792","doi":"","title":"Canada’s Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act and Secret Commissions Offense","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American University international law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Ratification; Legislation; Language change; Enforcement; Convention; Law; Political science; Business; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.02130956694984576,"score_gpt":0.27143593421231443,"score_spread":0.2501263672624687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W195506792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027870173,0.026042102,0.00083298254,0.09540306,0.0028706437,0.00016579387,0.0064267893,0.00019543174,0.84019303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5166284,0.026485728,0.0015856334,0.03193344,0.0009775468,0.000111314395,0.0035382628,0.00010718955,0.41863242],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910806,0.00030656726,0.00015578922,0.00031104774,0.0061530746,0.001992987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99269086,0.00081678666,0.00070124725,0.00019256696,0.004247836,0.0013507026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012380849,0.0004083564,0.0002648351,0.0030004065,0.009587952,0.0067885076,0.0010600166,0.0025516672,0.011922412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007521024,0.00028813301,0.00033563175,0.0039054092,0.0047501274,0.0010231892,0.0014429732,0.0033150024,0.0011909101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028461667,0.000044347522,0.010939234,0.00020795269,0.000012030392,0.00032923216,0.002585493,0.00069079717,0.00009240128,0.24469902,0.693594,0.04677701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009611445,0.000009909067,0.030943988,0.00044177668,0.000016456273,0.00009558807,0.0011914833,0.00061836926,0.00017260102,0.0036974396,0.96275526,0.000047439626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99532664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12741728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12741728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22355151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9244814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W279715644","doi":"","title":"Symposium: Bribes without Borders: The Challenge of Fighting Corruption in the Global Context: Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American University international law review","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Political science; Accountability; International law; Context (archaeology); Public administration; Human rights; Legitimacy; Law; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Corporate governance; International community; Rule of law; State (computer science); Economics; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.016273903423315656,"score_gpt":0.2919334625282039,"score_spread":0.27565955910488826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W279715644","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012049744,0.35320276,0.0008415591,0.5014516,0.09861251,0.00010242612,0.00013220588,0.00004680322,0.044405125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030149708,0.3927648,0.0010748737,0.35590902,0.1262632,0.00022958331,0.00019695272,0.00014490439,0.09326696],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975026,0.0008343857,0.00012578722,0.0002955657,0.0009172879,0.0003243289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960263,0.0014769824,0.00030646252,0.0001171425,0.0015185159,0.00055458775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038022592,0.00060878805,0.00061461364,0.0016492374,0.0030248913,0.0073850635,0.0011815075,0.00822376,0.009336496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075470414,0.00035086548,0.0007177616,0.0017041098,0.003917437,0.005471856,0.0024451902,0.00818013,0.0035546855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009991245,0.000025044554,0.00014961485,0.00056454627,0.000008850385,0.00006231756,0.0005216914,0.000108226785,0.00013675173,0.027104968,0.95621103,0.015096916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004278665,0.000019115847,0.00040456405,0.000877656,0.000008268843,0.00006725899,0.0004287838,0.000032625532,0.00004441708,0.00441836,0.99368423,0.000010450106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008091169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010619229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009336496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041545173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064350646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031233728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896581969","doi":"","title":"La \"Responsabilidad De Respetar\" Los Derechos Humanos Y El Establecimiento Del Deber De Debida Diligencia Como Una Obligacion Legal Para Las Industrias Extractivas: Desafios Y Oportunidades En Las Americas","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"American University international law review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Penology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.045078505620818186,"score_gpt":0.3790467932751465,"score_spread":0.33396828765432834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896581969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7292839,0.030862104,0.0017486943,0.05694408,0.0004522622,0.000057529018,0.00038841847,0.000072586365,0.18019044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95950097,0.011339653,0.00055962306,0.0019530238,0.0001568196,0.000021984344,0.000084833424,0.00001324579,0.026369866],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987846,0.00045834717,0.000039621595,0.0001769212,0.00028105715,0.0002593913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969951,0.0006998101,0.00091301865,0.00015888401,0.0008469217,0.00038623068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016001009,0.00026206035,0.00015957058,0.00080699706,0.0037971206,0.0043513593,0.00074914546,0.0020880746,0.008629562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020843667,0.00033416037,0.00021129526,0.0014288981,0.006901305,0.0028589594,0.0022352876,0.0014387614,0.0007289206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002483682,0.00030511286,0.25229898,0.0012406921,0.00006493094,0.0016083802,0.14537568,0.00076982635,0.0072416677,0.22612554,0.052704815,0.31201607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001985864,0.00017788222,0.34528744,0.0014774968,0.00004842197,0.0009799355,0.19751476,0.00043068363,0.0015900903,0.018763391,0.43364474,0.00006528746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065224804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09863628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065224804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003408751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008207547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12969029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W804701997","doi":"","title":"“Americans: We Love You, But We Can’t Afford You”: How the Costly U.S.-Canada FATCA Agreement Permits Discrimination of Americans in Violation of International Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American University international law review","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Law; Opposition (politics); Revenue; Payment; International law; Tax law; Public international law; Political science; Economics; Accounting; Double taxation; Finance","score_opus":0.03545902024779105,"score_gpt":0.25077589703494524,"score_spread":0.2153168767871542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W804701997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106011935,0.0049210046,0.0026812179,0.17528692,0.0016779961,0.00011297351,0.00016298096,0.0000936553,0.7090514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8351467,0.0038618261,0.0011794366,0.08185651,0.00042977367,0.00009589367,0.00008997851,0.00011338274,0.077226356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99448097,0.0021979422,0.000057698748,0.00050774176,0.00092204934,0.0018334761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995742,0.001968086,0.0002821614,0.00022766014,0.0010910162,0.00068904815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006328223,0.00031987624,0.00023439,0.00078628946,0.020626241,0.012593372,0.0023846691,0.0059105675,0.023401765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012701187,0.00032934605,0.00039651283,0.00093709445,0.016050633,0.0059741936,0.0046826783,0.007041459,0.0022048107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064850836,0.00022228839,0.0148513615,0.000105000516,0.000027515382,0.0011249946,0.06639881,0.00048562253,0.00046816914,0.54162025,0.30401784,0.070613265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029684385,0.00006123619,0.012628117,0.0013032991,0.00008362479,0.0005670183,0.15602554,0.0015008077,0.0008279668,0.11738799,0.7094601,0.00012455044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52004707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6779112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47995293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018284278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025014423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96555895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}