{"meta":{"query_hash":"620457f9f127","filters":{"venue":"Analecta hermeneutica"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/620457f9f127","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Analecta+hermeneutica"},"results":[{"id":"W1493504964","doi":"","title":"“Idea”: The Genealogy of the Word from Kant to Schelling","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analecta hermeneutica","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Word (group theory); Genealogy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.025589702810423214,"score_gpt":0.3045213613966041,"score_spread":0.27893165858618085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493504964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74327904,0.00009968082,0.00021244255,0.027086584,0.00038024838,0.0002322286,0.000009140968,0.000028673061,0.22867198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957132,0.000019932075,0.000091606,0.003378542,0.00048753046,0.0000072561384,6.0827523e-7,0.0000072167604,0.00029413705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853194,0.0006130718,0.00017094266,0.00017175304,0.00024358013,0.0002687377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840546,0.0010447003,0.00003776696,0.000354423,0.000054929675,0.00010272377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069921365,0.0000767601,0.00013222815,0.000019321835,0.00052324886,0.000032135507,0.00054869405,0.00006476096,0.00038530154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053678866,0.000046314835,0.00009538123,0.00034952565,0.00040439935,0.000031152897,0.000081603415,0.00014663664,0.00008488258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002406404,0.000031721305,0.0005270503,0.0000034023076,0.00002522623,7.282847e-7,0.005308418,0.000033909528,0.0035076533,0.98302585,0.00024052721,0.0072714654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001068164,0.00004741184,0.0023372467,0.000033337707,0.000051659714,4.7437229e-7,0.0006510468,0.000120256256,0.004664409,0.7549288,0.2369198,0.00013872253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006816294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087977044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25243416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019385361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059553255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42187816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1711010758","doi":"","title":"Review of Jeffrey P. Greenman, Read Mercer Schuchardt, and Noah J. Toly, Understanding Jacques Ellul (James Clarke & Co: Cambridge, UK, 2013)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analecta hermeneutica","topic":"African history and culture analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.08327623704510861,"score_gpt":0.3328093281220054,"score_spread":0.2495330910768968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1711010758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02179977,0.1594729,0.00016454009,0.0062667164,0.0002904949,0.0006814698,0.00004329478,0.00015143122,0.8111294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82547146,0.14029224,0.00017688306,0.0036659206,0.0003639714,0.000026541822,0.000034326757,0.000036026755,0.029932644],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774414,0.000461725,0.0004316199,0.0003927684,0.0005536175,0.00041609723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985965,0.00012788243,0.00025347,0.00033074245,0.00032902157,0.00036237217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012186863,0.00021349596,0.0005460181,0.000118767646,0.00043854915,0.00004726971,0.00030122502,0.00014542855,0.0007956135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003354078,0.00019284485,0.00016739589,0.00066605053,0.00067835016,0.00023847881,0.000050691626,0.0001924255,0.000050514907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060327486,0.00010144816,0.0050805276,0.0006448406,0.0003948347,0.000025653853,0.010993135,0.0000015124166,0.00036297753,0.027167166,0.9534917,0.0016758927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027487797,0.0001474631,0.000291992,0.001091871,0.0006136401,0.0000058110513,0.00853705,0.000023958597,0.00009923484,0.0012029161,0.98730344,0.0004077607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041232384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059960783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80367166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002824562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029338416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.871141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1731615955","doi":"","title":"Iain Hamilton Grant in conversation with Sean J. McGrath at the Jockey Club, St. John's, Newfoundland, 6 June 2014","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analecta hermeneutica","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Club; Conversation; Art; Library science; History; Media studies; Sociology; Medicine; Communication; Computer science","score_opus":0.01843257910699945,"score_gpt":0.23991380861647377,"score_spread":0.22148122950947433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1731615955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7947076,0.0010371658,0.000024021087,0.027451426,0.0010126351,0.00087104074,0.000040823354,0.000107677835,0.17474765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95941097,0.00058013113,0.000018573177,0.0010060781,0.00017049306,0.000019823032,0.0000252066,0.000016781347,0.03875195],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838156,0.00031629496,0.0001756584,0.00025507162,0.0004753607,0.00039606474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999219,0.000088160465,0.000082075945,0.00025322678,0.00009433954,0.00026320334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007933521,0.00010905743,0.0001588408,0.00023073054,0.0007743383,0.00022874221,0.0002454057,0.00009241897,0.0004101353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007131918,0.00009726621,0.000048043665,0.0005162296,0.00068308675,0.00019671347,0.000026748445,0.00017654478,0.00022810674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051085366,0.00022224043,0.0513205,0.000036933037,0.00012355414,0.0002928155,0.16938226,0.00017601723,0.00022862917,0.019551259,0.7526425,0.00551245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067732146,0.00008169061,0.0060436316,0.00001781163,0.000037891896,0.0000052473074,0.0036431719,0.000090975074,0.0000053975077,0.0008104116,0.98840564,0.00018082336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53641945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4605064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019992357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012527367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5955663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283024960","doi":"","title":"Schelling’s Philosophical Ethnology: History, Mythology and the Question of South America","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analecta hermeneutica","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Relation (database); Agency (philosophy); Action (physics); Metaphysics; Realm; Natural (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.0835934075587748,"score_gpt":0.2760810509874641,"score_spread":0.1924876434286893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283024960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23948784,0.009082429,0.000105377585,0.1463252,0.0022561804,0.0007502517,0.000066449116,0.0002885488,0.6016377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943681,0.00011146761,0.00006462333,0.0035021824,0.0006794903,0.00001674223,0.000008862611,0.000016443542,0.0012320946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985376,0.00035789522,0.00033165555,0.00026125213,0.00020856597,0.00030300757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990534,0.0002591415,0.000115791685,0.00026101797,0.00013682144,0.00017383033],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003148359,0.00016822248,0.0003594899,0.00007354595,0.000109942775,0.00001974367,0.00019325761,0.0001091831,0.0004884203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002688052,0.000109253,0.00010007739,0.000047435336,0.0034140532,0.00006173464,0.00008132441,0.0003347668,0.00007940633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003036637,0.000079995705,0.000055316184,0.000016494603,0.00005497362,0.000006137177,0.008192346,0.0000012435975,0.000022285922,0.98967004,0.000947749,0.00064977276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014315199,0.00035828663,0.00008600134,0.000024187197,0.00015533809,0.000017283983,0.0007587054,0.00044901544,0.00003987421,0.66669255,0.32978678,0.00020046772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013144704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021625197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75488025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052326308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062371495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336477282","doi":"","title":"Review of Eric L. Jenkins, Free to Say No? Free Will and Augustine’s Evolving Doctrines of Grace and Election (Cambridge: James Clarke & Co., 2013)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analecta hermeneutica","topic":"Augustinian Studies and Theology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibilism; Philosophy; Scholarship; Free will; Exegesis; Epistemology; Position (finance); Classics; Law; Theology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.013331185975130687,"score_gpt":0.2378835553099519,"score_spread":0.2245523693348212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336477282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74350584,0.12413016,0.000045522702,0.014410467,0.0007039989,0.0013110447,0.00034989452,0.00015591248,0.11538719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8895886,0.0974059,0.00020787286,0.0016425679,0.00037842992,0.00003708565,0.0000048992674,0.00003745267,0.010697203],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998752,0.00007418273,0.00043186234,0.00030442432,0.00014178279,0.00029573854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987357,0.0002539517,0.00022112939,0.0003940942,0.00030788447,0.000087212095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023375612,0.00020546488,0.0005068729,0.0001132763,0.00017096227,0.000019571942,0.00020091937,0.00005132081,0.0008020413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004596477,0.00014183592,0.00006884413,0.00009847172,0.00041390353,0.00016405109,0.00021903511,0.00008405675,0.000012568506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029639446,0.00018323257,0.007983822,0.006551084,0.00052244356,0.000010619186,0.0023958832,2.0931978e-7,0.004580037,0.087263264,0.8693044,0.020908562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014215709,0.0014105791,0.01696453,0.0053781266,0.0004147006,0.000039553437,0.00037561505,0.000027529826,0.0006561616,0.0036151393,0.96912247,0.0005740415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055969873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081414555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14608277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019470843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003251355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.878179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597228145","doi":"","title":"The Significance of Self-Affection: Michel Henry’s Critique of Kant","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analecta hermeneutica","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Epistemology; Scholarship; Michel foucault; Context (archaeology); Principal (computer security); Affection; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; History; Politics","score_opus":0.016514146185430095,"score_gpt":0.3140953867681474,"score_spread":0.2975812405827173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597228145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50654894,0.0007729662,0.00030286156,0.039542463,0.0006539434,0.00079475256,0.000039757826,0.00015544744,0.45118886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998434,0.00040963222,0.000045371147,0.00019675506,0.00017907486,0.00001760484,1.8550831e-7,0.000006923154,0.0007104477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986597,0.0004536762,0.00023371485,0.00015551665,0.00024083763,0.0002565924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976573,0.0017979991,0.00006845168,0.00022613499,0.00016139496,0.00008871499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008016691,0.00007876896,0.00015365434,0.00002680489,0.0003165685,0.00001359604,0.00026462265,0.00007455933,0.00016720522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043289,0.000048235695,0.000101123565,0.00025457944,0.00074607634,0.000081761806,0.000025188245,0.0000702144,0.000015554013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055066426,0.00010183443,0.0003651696,0.000027847162,0.00004120835,0.0000018889016,0.0012495826,2.134474e-7,0.033127066,0.95927685,0.00057765655,0.005175617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004414854,0.00038475217,0.001255528,0.00013920553,0.00008325474,0.000002805721,0.001521537,0.000009031592,0.09724039,0.72589505,0.17274967,0.00027727697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001296433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017083166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49188504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037718535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001161764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27489495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800294215","doi":"","title":"Levinas’ God: Ethical Horizon, Political Necessity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analecta hermeneutica","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Thou; Politics; Framing (construction); Universality (dynamical systems); Philosophy; Economic Justice; Absolute (philosophy); Face (sociological concept); Law; Sociology; Theology; Epistemology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.06407564248091634,"score_gpt":0.3065752229323946,"score_spread":0.24249958045147824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800294215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07275638,0.00008771369,0.00001780651,0.031305388,0.0015232471,0.00013128061,0.00004178612,0.00022465199,0.8939117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796516,0.000027055561,0.000040319177,0.00968008,0.0065440256,0.00001028572,0.000018476727,0.00003536256,0.003992813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997815,0.00018639675,0.00035241627,0.00044736365,0.00040597006,0.0007928285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986644,0.00014457192,0.00006630714,0.0004575773,0.00033246807,0.000334711],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027709335,0.00025115302,0.0003117543,0.000099119374,0.0010507021,0.00027307373,0.00037611468,0.00031825076,0.0050877715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018271171,0.00022593762,0.00017703837,0.00007295282,0.0020426319,0.00016987702,0.00012940944,0.0008676623,0.0014824586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003940127,0.00009323544,0.00005500522,0.000027460277,0.000059783993,0.000018164867,0.0056605954,2.8616949e-8,0.00020056432,0.97903055,0.014143397,0.00067180936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037192812,0.0006824299,0.00033084545,0.000045611065,0.00009156536,0.000019439865,0.0008833069,0.00008649483,0.0006503599,0.35532844,0.64106196,0.00044762294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005435544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027110009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9068952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006991437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011485484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808231890","doi":"","title":"Review of Riccardo Saccenti’s Debating Medieval Natural Law: A Survey (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2016)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analecta hermeneutica","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Natural law; Natural (archaeology); Middle Ages; Ideology; Reading (process); Philosophy; Period (music); Law; Transition (genetics); Canon law; Classics; Epistemology; History; Humanities; Political science; Politics; Theology; Aesthetics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04838886735422862,"score_gpt":0.26499434098453806,"score_spread":0.21660547363030944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808231890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19240704,0.0410029,0.0000056710223,0.0046714433,0.0016980228,0.001249889,0.0011720379,0.00013364333,0.7576593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99211663,0.0045589986,0.00003113924,0.0010917059,0.00034110752,0.0000011560901,0.00007323372,0.000016929196,0.001769127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981606,0.00035680248,0.00046227168,0.00031379383,0.00030323857,0.00040331634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867207,0.00033799323,0.00019428304,0.0003313921,0.00033958742,0.00012468845],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035312548,0.00020256206,0.00052613515,0.000051275598,0.00015444787,0.000019722189,0.0003707528,0.00007435277,0.0018015591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017638017,0.00017651904,0.00017998321,0.00013678469,0.0008432198,0.00016855131,0.00015865664,0.00024564538,0.00003819585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008850584,0.0016341521,0.005333786,0.009303602,0.00078188145,0.000067010864,0.008788629,0.0000020024236,0.00047874625,0.91293305,0.05401547,0.0057766144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026578305,0.0009781418,0.019036602,0.013824467,0.00068149366,0.000011820179,0.0006062094,0.0006703778,0.0011138231,0.030015873,0.9291148,0.0012885146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042350465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00703751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88291717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000461658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007118121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808261997","doi":"","title":"Charles Taylor’s Modern Identity and the “Atonement Muddle”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analecta hermeneutica","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Dignity; Natural order; Sociology; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Environmental ethics; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029578485335485113,"score_gpt":0.31666793208644683,"score_spread":0.2870894467509617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808261997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33482927,0.00039940563,0.00034687654,0.015701724,0.00028967092,0.0003440181,0.000005552492,0.00007550099,0.648008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99428284,0.00035897578,0.000037395133,0.003048587,0.00041782847,0.000021804644,6.814958e-7,0.000005733309,0.0018261769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988898,0.00017498822,0.00014869982,0.00020117321,0.0001842025,0.00040110902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993923,0.0001771747,0.00003907022,0.00017698418,0.000054214608,0.00016028651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071525987,0.000084781495,0.00013660525,0.000027870266,0.0008581325,0.00013705353,0.00023881264,0.00006110354,0.00084430835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017797972,0.00006280635,0.00005049948,0.000116968164,0.0019357334,0.00025046224,0.00009961882,0.00008981137,0.00014494659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024100402,0.000026048394,0.00039243788,0.000004286821,0.000033034936,0.0000015321758,0.0067949,7.876387e-8,0.0000523117,0.9783175,0.00060677103,0.013746994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012112039,0.000084439525,0.004200269,0.000015607111,0.00010303899,0.000003202057,0.002735773,0.001381594,0.0003826116,0.76817346,0.22140235,0.00030643574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024730132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010457851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6594536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042561132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082155726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92445844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936175451","doi":"","title":"Let’s Not Talk About the Anthropocene","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analecta hermeneutica","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Anthropocene; Epistemology; Irrational number; Sociology; Philosophy of science; Psychology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3415992462375876,"score_gpt":0.44764441047846776,"score_spread":0.10604516424088017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936175451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4382568,0.000070722686,0.0000019874253,0.018794494,0.0002405106,0.00020431327,0.000004193576,0.000061824816,0.54236513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836437,0.009282601,0.00001751956,0.0026331786,0.00015583202,0.000012433279,0.0000110757255,0.000009604008,0.0042340737],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897313,0.00023599245,0.00012905269,0.00014971729,0.0002515916,0.0002605043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992062,0.00017184202,0.000051926556,0.00043684954,0.00006617068,0.000067047804],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042343428,0.00007549098,0.00009431866,0.00003307217,0.0006392206,0.00009124119,0.0004098166,0.00006963935,0.012158189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059604507,0.00005824532,0.00006296538,0.00026967324,0.00028442603,0.00010595623,0.0000643201,0.00013522073,0.001371325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016449596,0.0005930536,0.044558313,0.000085808344,0.00015825567,0.000010114558,0.14569557,0.000019913798,0.04172872,0.118417904,0.032516636,0.6160512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017846475,0.000038219085,0.035140418,0.000017591681,0.000016534332,0.0000016091477,0.005841168,0.00017940985,0.0002210858,0.0005146885,0.95769817,0.00015263112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001001058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040485444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92518157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077042314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006749128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938354412","doi":"","title":"Review of Henning Schmidgen, Bruno Latour in Pieces: An Intellectual Biography . Translated by Gloria Custance. New York: Fordham University Press, 2014. xvi + 175 pages","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analecta hermeneutica","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Ethnography; Art history; Sociology; Hermeneutics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Art; Anthropology","score_opus":0.03358468041634695,"score_gpt":0.22610497546515831,"score_spread":0.19252029504881135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938354412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40435463,0.3640345,0.00006718242,0.0031663,0.0014558987,0.0018364427,0.00014049908,0.0002699089,0.22467464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84509164,0.11558767,0.00018211528,0.0026597916,0.00037734202,0.000004933255,0.00013115648,0.00005157906,0.03591375],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998641,0.00008241859,0.0003151296,0.00035745994,0.00024065918,0.00036331936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992844,0.00006449422,0.00011851898,0.00028467894,0.00008544002,0.00016248856],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029333585,0.00018546879,0.0004002716,0.00021365307,0.00014071909,0.00002111001,0.0003447893,0.00006383076,0.002810526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002169348,0.00016801136,0.000113661714,0.00030366037,0.00029750922,0.00037740622,0.000018316658,0.00019986148,0.000054140753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014904806,0.00022376269,0.0008425264,0.0013216679,0.000099855846,0.00001417038,0.0330002,0.0000043709965,0.0028600544,0.0032159127,0.9481367,0.010131739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054000504,0.00034992938,0.00009034197,0.0017173007,0.000073820986,0.0000014491538,0.0022573,0.00005869661,0.00016589244,0.000036431302,0.99450177,0.00020706815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011079236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022181808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44073704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045015084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015990755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99810106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942786064","doi":"","title":"Review of Dale M. Schlitt, German Idealism’s Trinitarian Legacy . Albany, NY: SUNY, 2016. 456 pages","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analecta hermeneutica","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; German idealism; Idealism; Philosophy; German; German philosophy; Doctrine; Epistemology; Philosophy of history; Theology","score_opus":0.0395619857931601,"score_gpt":0.28788738650105733,"score_spread":0.24832540070789721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942786064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026088966,0.02933072,0.0000027000665,0.0118630715,0.0008466649,0.00043935978,0.00008723224,0.00013062211,0.93121064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97249,0.009659123,0.000037567184,0.0070388457,0.0017028039,0.000022093049,0.00004674502,0.000033843164,0.008968959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822706,0.0002185974,0.0005632284,0.00036420277,0.00019137554,0.00043554214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855125,0.00018920579,0.00022865602,0.0006330849,0.0002671834,0.00013063909],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004573328,0.00026756045,0.00052220497,0.00012886709,0.0004273441,0.00006510219,0.0004649807,0.00009976359,0.0122364145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103243285,0.00022980158,0.00021510199,0.000102905295,0.0011741341,0.00028649924,0.000099776815,0.00023159916,0.0006485565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007238674,0.00012759033,0.00007177295,0.001084288,0.00020257526,0.000014060106,0.0033686692,3.9443346e-8,0.00019224061,0.8358361,0.15632457,0.0027057063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042413108,0.0005256581,0.00043912066,0.0018044541,0.00023820513,0.000016076847,0.00012614137,0.000004846346,0.00050175213,0.06633564,0.9292324,0.00035155044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029320785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011277327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94640106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020780188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013239992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98866653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952418811","doi":"","title":"Review of John Haugeland, Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger . Ed. Joseph Rouse. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2013. 336 pages","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analecta hermeneutica","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Order (exchange); Analytic philosophy; Classics; Art history; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; History","score_opus":0.017572326404686773,"score_gpt":0.2566032037600367,"score_spread":0.23903087735534992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952418811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1416603,0.049119614,0.000043113185,0.009017092,0.0020273537,0.002115344,0.00086024404,0.00032300828,0.79483396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90966487,0.054743875,0.00008619963,0.0034208666,0.00031293518,0.000027983613,0.0003420629,0.00009354083,0.031307694],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666816,0.0006244416,0.00065370474,0.00089170825,0.00032411222,0.0008378628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975588,0.00021647314,0.00040642067,0.0013980302,0.00016045317,0.00025987998],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044470103,0.00047238392,0.0009544598,0.00018590763,0.00018824181,0.000028974826,0.00082647783,0.00035614902,0.004406133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004885264,0.0004534926,0.00035901004,0.00041172456,0.0003258873,0.00029798242,0.00026821106,0.0005953279,0.0026409645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078681024,0.000949526,0.015080569,0.002268417,0.0016612516,0.00022299624,0.0003270262,0.000009538414,0.0014159572,0.026545137,0.94982845,0.00090432056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020855346,0.00054790964,0.029012352,0.0012698929,0.0006891187,0.000053696444,0.00011325409,0.000018915322,0.00014229317,0.000703105,0.9646356,0.0007283138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005022202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009208252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76800454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000882703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011392578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956089962","doi":"","title":"Review of Mona Siddiqui, Hospitality and Islam: Welcoming in God’s Name , New Haven and London, Yale University Press, 2015. 274 pages","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analecta hermeneutica","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Hospitality; Theme (computing); Politics; Islam; Sociology; Scholarship; Christianity; Media studies; Religious studies; Theology; Law; Philosophy; Tourism; Political science","score_opus":0.013077302361467837,"score_gpt":0.2532255551120702,"score_spread":0.24014825275060234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956089962","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6490091,0.1626132,0.0000017498229,0.0069954274,0.0001854426,0.00073500775,0.000015929001,0.000035051675,0.18040906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7034216,0.2836229,0.00004930826,0.00027621468,0.00003786492,0.000001081134,0.0000015370343,0.000006946459,0.012582561],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906147,0.00013660293,0.00016617618,0.00024910428,0.00015251197,0.0002341213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953747,0.000101284866,0.000098137796,0.00015097435,0.000047554095,0.00006460332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036171247,0.00009420119,0.00029704618,0.000033109038,0.00015960196,0.000014339348,0.00013840626,0.00006703183,0.00014090234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006134368,0.00010604768,0.000043205342,0.00013260708,0.00028614028,0.00012794904,0.00010889445,0.000102500795,0.0000038429453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018339249,0.0004826472,0.26223034,0.009674867,0.00048421917,0.00011707891,0.08317591,0.000004381451,0.0007956823,0.084987834,0.45906693,0.09879672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006798667,0.00012696585,0.0840058,0.0017371733,0.00010847289,0.0000017837533,0.0051881536,0.000028139242,0.000019154513,0.00074371067,0.9070322,0.000328569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013714856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011062946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4479653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009624266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013343466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}