{"meta":{"query_hash":"31f86b22c6e6","filters":{"venue":"Anales de Geografía de la Universidad Complutense"},"cohort_total":1,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1,"exported":1,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/31f86b22c6e6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Anales+de+Geograf%C3%ADa+de+la+Universidad+Complutense"},"results":[{"id":"W1969773448","doi":"10.5209/rev_aguc.2012.v32.n1.39311","title":"Evaluación de la gobernanza en los espacios naturales protegidos. El caso de la Columbia Británica y Ontario (Canadá)","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Anales de Geografía de la Universidad Complutense","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Stakeholder; Diversity (politics); Political science; Geography; Welfare economics; Environmental resource management; Public administration; Business; Public relations; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.006092039296474753,"score_gpt":0.2389855915885834,"score_spread":0.23289355229210865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969773448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745409,0.000728066,0.00030171746,0.00020455604,0.0000066767498,0.00010124192,0.00085031684,0.000018781477,0.023247821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861355,0.00079747447,0.0008467645,0.00004741186,0.0000031002007,0.00005895248,0.00089824694,0.000012036213,0.011200565],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934834,0.000076747594,0.000017102604,0.00006728247,0.00034905903,0.00014140793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807286,0.00023690924,0.00017522585,0.00006863069,0.001276874,0.00016937325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015563886,0.0003425884,0.00029072046,0.0014787496,0.0016582231,0.0016582467,0.000371466,0.00024151172,0.0021534949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022793554,0.00014668156,0.00022814226,0.003507606,0.001395679,0.00043214392,0.0006934719,0.00030966106,0.0001447606],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001702719,0.00026818612,0.6954887,0.0009656524,0.00027418358,0.0011846402,0.04594107,0.007987485,0.01359447,0.0061305547,0.009087129,0.2173753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002434942,0.00010193696,0.96029437,0.000096738935,0.00006304277,0.000034072782,0.01794887,0.0010410032,0.0008701325,0.00019989719,0.019303028,0.000022581984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.986795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9705069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029493108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019479532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21398848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}