{"meta":{"query_hash":"3a06e400f45b","filters":{"venue":"Annals of allergy"},"cohort_total":1,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1,"exported":1,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3a06e400f45b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Annals+of+allergy"},"results":[{"id":"W13259318","doi":"","title":"A CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE PAROL EVIDENCE RULE IN CONTRACT LAW","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of allergy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Rigour; Commission; Common law; Law and economics; Political science; Unconscionability; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09056264957926108,"score_gpt":0.4188014815222654,"score_spread":0.3282388319430043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W13259318","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011606954,0.056991044,0.04400944,0.7166318,0.020513983,0.0007760187,0.00015031283,0.00006209754,0.1492583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5751875,0.03307957,0.039668426,0.2866098,0.03637103,0.0015237228,0.00010891005,0.00014318619,0.02730774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9253368,0.04544945,0.003688117,0.0042584143,0.018906143,0.0023611514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77827007,0.19670825,0.0044617034,0.0036804245,0.015701545,0.0011779319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08410316,0.00070180546,0.0012427162,0.0048728203,0.009631587,0.015513564,0.0039186785,0.021915238,0.0019687198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16689712,0.00084220007,0.0015257274,0.00302263,0.058596667,0.017090356,0.0034165338,0.02729227,0.0007118301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019089412,0.000007065663,0.00010159899,0.00017178702,0.000005039326,0.0002519328,0.0025832446,0.00021245886,0.000057232774,0.97482693,0.016392503,0.005371141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003956924,0.00006888236,0.0005686617,0.002493719,0.000022424207,0.00029568817,0.0046160584,0.001315778,0.00037754048,0.7261274,0.26397943,0.00009473827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013209812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012801644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08410316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017486457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01923094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44478536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}