{"meta":{"query_hash":"8f8d959a1935","filters":{"venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science"},"cohort_total":24,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":24,"exported":24,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8f8d959a1935","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Annual+Review+of+Law+and+Social+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W2053683773","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173900","title":"Law's Archive","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Legal history; Subject (documents); Sovereignty; Critical legal studies; Power (physics); Politics; History; Comparative law; Political science; Legal realism","score_opus":0.021700796354050145,"score_gpt":0.3520814148400247,"score_spread":0.33038061848597455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053683773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00094685366,0.030083584,0.0000056206463,0.0025128066,0.00021113662,0.00017205758,0.000025729349,0.000021207608,0.966021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94954056,0.034706134,0.00024660624,0.014558032,0.00043789664,0.000008472354,0.0000023363737,0.000003726263,0.00049622206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865115,0.00012421588,0.0001522239,0.00013219939,0.00055367,0.0003865514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994653,0.000059093454,0.00008768535,0.000071315204,0.00016363415,0.00015296985],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022544777,0.000068497284,0.00018373829,0.0000028241966,0.0016592625,0.000030963667,0.00029288034,0.000052491858,0.00008149806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010155048,0.000053102136,0.00008602274,0.00026785125,0.004701855,0.00074620295,0.00007889412,0.00009388061,0.000012544911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.21854e-7,0.000020358531,0.000041064843,0.00016946968,0.0000026201476,1.072579e-7,0.049847286,1.3011047e-9,0.000035150606,0.94646996,0.0017511178,0.0016623473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035057397,0.000011250394,0.00020908876,0.00023047363,0.000018459494,5.1666274e-7,0.00675425,3.538978e-8,0.000036218946,0.0077825156,0.98483634,0.00008578556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008977725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001449762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9830852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023843832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101248515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113978615","doi":"10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172309","title":"Women in the Legal Profession","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Feminization (sociology); Remuneration; Inequality; Legal education; Law; Legal research; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.055934275401579865,"score_gpt":0.43478064499133956,"score_spread":0.3788463695897597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113978615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0824866,0.0020786999,0.0000015740864,0.09368866,0.00019715684,0.00030304087,0.0000037229865,0.000009355657,0.8212312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98135084,0.0052922023,0.000021281106,0.012649073,0.00006645392,0.000017846201,5.2118605e-7,9.758189e-7,0.0006008331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988819,0.00022950387,0.0001566876,0.00009209584,0.0004395092,0.0002003496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994998,0.00012121757,0.00008711956,0.000058613485,0.00019635692,0.00003691854],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004432101,0.000034091285,0.00009364151,0.000024962932,0.001371702,0.00003371252,0.00025368674,0.0000222979,0.000056141955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066359766,0.000022621272,0.000016256243,0.0008488965,0.0015015568,0.0009769585,0.000022991828,0.00013534116,0.0000047943995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.7569646e-7,0.000030449864,0.00013112964,0.000050840605,4.060408e-7,5.719631e-7,0.16062222,2.049789e-9,0.0000071401005,0.8355622,0.0012372534,0.002356885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003377859,0.000012970052,0.003935544,0.00010253287,0.000001811356,0.0000014520787,0.032319143,9.044384e-8,0.000002925055,0.0011512807,0.9624002,0.000038253063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027294008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019649643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.961163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042662305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093906873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116510938","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173915","title":"Regulating Sex Work: Heterogeneity in Legal Strategies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Decriminalization; Criminalization; Legislation; Business; Work (physics); State (computer science); Sex work; Control (management); Law and economics; Public economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.02860058400309768,"score_gpt":0.3716471012718713,"score_spread":0.3430465172687736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116510938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5555551,0.06391147,0.000004141963,0.0011447977,0.00023013301,0.00022437492,0.0000012954663,0.0000268653,0.3789018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99034387,0.008732847,0.00007747031,0.0005389695,0.00013574146,0.000003097001,5.420145e-7,0.0000027852943,0.00016467516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985922,0.00017230277,0.00023040618,0.00014831247,0.00043240032,0.0004243672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958533,0.000060198487,0.00009818839,0.00006690149,0.00009358778,0.00009579773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030187622,0.00007452376,0.00022026914,0.000029663535,0.0007327143,0.00006408569,0.00021457157,0.00006817452,0.000019751848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010690426,0.00006098239,0.000046207697,0.0006914567,0.0017278071,0.0009674327,0.00006556986,0.000107891814,0.0000034704958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035560586,0.00006150593,0.007100381,0.00032970394,0.0000064434953,0.0000012184613,0.15238246,3.8599367e-7,0.000058222595,0.81122243,0.00012368533,0.028709989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031421502,0.00007032184,0.034451414,0.004121002,0.000061341576,0.0000033755,0.16415618,0.0000024520718,0.000532377,0.0038151883,0.7918232,0.000648928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015611218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011068478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80740726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032866756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014629206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6366177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126995907","doi":"10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.110023","title":"Transnational Legality and the Immobilization of Local Agency","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Legitimation; Globalization; Legitimacy; Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Agency (philosophy); Law; Economic system; Sociology; Politics; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.012585830745082816,"score_gpt":0.25241789543392873,"score_spread":0.2398320646888459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126995907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49252376,0.025156403,0.0048628077,0.021875834,0.00037607347,0.0016403153,0.0000477464,0.00005629674,0.45346075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988212,0.00017103096,0.000010280682,0.0008795296,0.00007065737,0.0000023458992,0.000004881609,0.0000014408974,0.00003863022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993861,0.000010925742,0.0001957771,0.00010054348,0.00023524041,0.0000714467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995609,0.000019127283,0.00013675683,0.00004277215,0.00023693945,0.0000034981201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007997227,0.000046736473,0.00014175121,0.000017459823,0.00029145068,0.000034499295,0.0000998149,0.000013758996,0.000026520669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005098205,0.000028274853,0.000033649078,0.0001807738,0.0016926684,0.0005529433,0.0000327355,0.000024874747,4.0666296e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040019386,0.000012998929,0.00004686088,0.00061851396,8.5782693e-7,1.0238361e-7,0.00008225109,9.827603e-8,0.000021438167,0.99725056,0.000039924984,0.0019223939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072309544,0.000013513608,0.034178194,0.000295667,0.000108431734,9.926683e-7,0.00016234361,0.00013636985,0.00007191235,0.84867066,0.11546238,0.00017645661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040129476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015754077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5062974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000034382697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023187335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6236707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133774763","doi":"10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131448","title":"The Expanding Purview of Cultural Properties and Their Politics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Environmental ethics; Cultural heritage; Intellectual property; Sociology; Modernity; Indigenous; Cultural heritage management; Intangible cultural heritage; Possessive; Premise; Law; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12764431590834216,"score_gpt":0.3070454755326178,"score_spread":0.17940115962427564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133774763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20185962,0.21775207,0.000001724795,0.011085584,0.00018545208,0.00063230644,0.000029800603,0.000025146279,0.5684283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97906876,0.019217141,0.0000031659692,0.0009930258,0.00006154898,0.0000016663892,9.4019055e-7,8.3730754e-7,0.0006529228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995574,0.000023752738,0.00014017064,0.000064457025,0.00011725552,0.00009698014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996973,0.000017437509,0.00006894348,0.0000393215,0.0001620323,0.000014923243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039916133,0.00004888731,0.00011702762,0.0000061495966,0.0007526719,0.000086701795,0.000109729306,0.0000069093094,0.000009095973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027447211,0.000022118298,0.00002633715,0.00003409169,0.0010302978,0.00042284786,0.000040295577,0.000025486393,2.2593302e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.8812266e-7,0.0000038018156,0.0000030644942,0.00037806056,0.0000020473667,2.6490367e-8,0.033182234,2.036536e-9,0.000077209654,0.9483146,0.00017036221,0.017867701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064839485,0.000112405134,0.0003831515,0.00124161,0.000023600816,4.879217e-7,0.031238485,0.0000045882966,0.00021124525,0.010765319,0.9558514,0.00010290292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011528622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046382516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.955681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000036495908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007385922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57890195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146649806","doi":"10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131445","title":"After the Rights Revolution: Bills of Rights in the Postconflict State","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Constitutionalism; Law; Politics; Political science; Fundamental rights; Bill of rights; Right to property; Democracy; State (computer science); International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.013930297102848262,"score_gpt":0.3189139990728605,"score_spread":0.30498370197001223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146649806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3359666,0.023041211,0.0000032908115,0.022005577,0.00051791355,0.00087372627,0.00008615603,0.000012067152,0.61749345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952629,0.0027714456,0.0000115600005,0.0018020836,0.00009681198,0.000012770748,2.8801242e-7,6.071222e-7,0.00004153127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987041,0.00014797138,0.00023060868,0.00013162999,0.0005868407,0.00019888215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934703,0.00015449466,0.00010949606,0.00008970742,0.00026956928,0.000029691717],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026239385,0.000062857885,0.00017739079,0.000017604421,0.0014069921,0.000021162907,0.00040162998,0.000028236842,0.000028960552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000119041266,0.000029639175,0.000059760026,0.00046801407,0.007356457,0.00024159493,0.000059571976,0.000121554265,0.000003307793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000369807,0.000017775326,0.00018660988,0.000026596252,0.0000025262966,8.700706e-7,0.013667007,5.9362946e-9,0.000019110377,0.9852728,0.00012957107,0.00067340885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060935396,0.000027063443,0.019958895,0.00029409077,0.000020390478,0.000001383058,0.0009458413,1.2347198e-7,0.000024953255,0.13970844,0.83887404,0.00008386318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03231372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024523301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84556437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011055613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001565758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151138624","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030532","title":"Law and Courts in Authoritarian Regimes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":234,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Political science; Law; Human rights; Transitional justice; Corporate governance; Politics; Subject (documents); Rule of law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Economics","score_opus":0.020798648409496256,"score_gpt":0.3339173211579476,"score_spread":0.31311867274845134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151138624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003989146,0.01693965,0.00000807132,0.008510096,0.0001282184,0.00015541862,0.0000073416936,0.000011711476,0.97025037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850951,0.011379696,0.000042052914,0.003318844,0.000103792205,0.000004225449,3.521101e-7,0.0000011997325,0.00005477622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989835,0.00010292735,0.00016261823,0.0001731606,0.00036647893,0.00021128937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996048,0.00008639402,0.00006205636,0.000040377974,0.0001389926,0.00006733269],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021072493,0.000060170234,0.0002178526,0.00001769887,0.0013807911,0.000030249663,0.00014417258,0.00003462853,0.000007927297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024039418,0.00005039082,0.000026260319,0.00021064174,0.0052749063,0.00030050272,0.00007609712,0.000058167632,0.000001925397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010243511,0.000008958489,0.00013909274,0.00006398159,0.0000014044477,4.4526178e-7,0.0036186778,5.4096283e-9,0.000004309706,0.9911817,0.00008449748,0.004895928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009639008,0.00003759557,0.0033992224,0.0006718291,0.00001628492,6.7873947e-7,0.0023541632,7.3330943e-7,0.0000066499883,0.18132184,0.811967,0.00012757185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01463209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039078826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9811059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020151318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121722864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152190582","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030719","title":"Disentangling Law: The Practice of Bracketing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Bracketing (phenomenology); Framing (construction); Categorization; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Ontic; Focus (optics); Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.014665848652081119,"score_gpt":0.3574987836192763,"score_spread":0.3428329349671952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152190582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026119817,0.015937693,0.0000095937085,0.0136289075,0.00017047313,0.00022851476,0.00000862129,0.00001577082,0.96738845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970635,0.016715778,0.00019869427,0.012100481,0.00020822934,0.0000036686329,6.1700337e-7,0.0000028822642,0.00013463257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845284,0.0003225246,0.00021963262,0.00014554223,0.0006511445,0.00020832132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874514,0.00042874843,0.00024880495,0.000095053656,0.00043014734,0.00005211178],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005769528,0.000059820904,0.00018464909,0.0000020237046,0.001809328,0.000041680625,0.00038956778,0.000044870645,0.000016156519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012199054,0.00003825432,0.00008389612,0.0003228772,0.004312241,0.0005588789,0.00008508248,0.00010337939,0.0000017891344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011714632,0.000013750946,0.000022023856,0.00021832986,0.000003390586,9.236946e-8,0.033264596,3.2059212e-8,0.000029569546,0.96268314,0.00025547954,0.0035084367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004656978,0.000019744719,0.000040861825,0.000501122,0.000044974862,5.989765e-7,0.024089264,0.000001521652,0.000063543965,0.0053290715,0.9697919,0.000070846436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073687884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012222756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001554242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008268274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157485406","doi":"10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131545","title":"The Comparative Politics of Carbon Taxation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon tax; Economics; Transparency (behavior); Greenhouse gas; Public economics; Politics; Harmonization; Carbon finance; Carbon offset; International economics; Natural resource economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07799985518009289,"score_gpt":0.3317396736252963,"score_spread":0.25373981844520344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157485406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6160565,0.014208426,0.0000047535204,0.0024367562,0.0003545127,0.00020496994,0.00028693865,0.000004951827,0.3664422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99153423,0.0077631064,0.000029036037,0.0005657583,0.000052559237,0.000003269992,0.000001574329,0.0000017852924,0.000048689133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994094,0.0000060773978,0.00031635226,0.000104424726,0.000029142995,0.00013459982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992919,0.000059014576,0.0004594867,0.00009132159,0.00006960689,0.000028657098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091498654,0.00004509395,0.0002237364,0.000020749536,0.00026211006,0.00001573264,0.00016189435,0.000025415375,0.000010455123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012236962,0.000037535323,0.000037924663,0.00010395839,0.00095465995,0.0001171976,0.00004633255,0.000061963474,0.000003528292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.7834234e-7,0.0000070181013,0.0004113775,0.00012925566,0.000002304689,1.4595399e-8,0.0022218253,1.6700108e-8,0.000033423094,0.9969568,0.00003000791,0.0002073455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004172682,0.00018318955,0.030173566,0.00042402878,0.000031228887,0.000004099914,0.0028923964,0.00030001637,0.0017997487,0.30311334,0.6601751,0.00048602675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006843193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012825863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6938435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010700265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020481195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35174844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163407336","doi":"10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131529","title":"Lineups and Eyewitness Identification","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Eyewitness identification; Identification (biology); Psychology; Criminal justice; Eyewitness testimony; Eyewitness memory; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; History; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.03213429410397181,"score_gpt":0.35910166706570595,"score_spread":0.32696737296173417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163407336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78276443,0.049214758,0.0001284676,0.0121152,0.00035959823,0.0008333264,0.00005155602,0.00007853181,0.15445414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748164,0.017364718,0.000018553646,0.007711489,0.000025268864,0.0000018095309,2.3102159e-7,0.0000011016757,0.000060435075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991329,0.000029173767,0.00019124906,0.00024293741,0.00027721561,0.00012653696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996294,0.000033292894,0.00011206648,0.00007310888,0.000106301,0.000045859746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006306135,0.000055549575,0.00013621822,0.000018004472,0.00038173085,0.00005172887,0.00019429873,0.000017380731,0.000007221064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003065294,0.000041993073,0.00001742397,0.0002914969,0.00089124916,0.0006502402,0.00003359143,0.000041147825,0.0000022741835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031823336,0.000029515026,0.000026819525,0.00093441777,3.7672905e-7,0.0000011239739,0.0012071527,5.1641646e-8,0.07168145,0.8471509,0.00007108559,0.07889388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008419499,0.0011041032,0.049345396,0.005881588,0.0001500626,0.0001020033,0.001722916,0.00013983155,0.47793695,0.09951769,0.3617849,0.0014726206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008875979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.755405e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7476333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000034966945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037794794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32838446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163576302","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102209-152951","title":"Specters of Foucault in Law and Society Scholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Michel foucault; Scholarship; Modernity; Foundation (evidence); Power (physics); Episteme; Law; Social theory; Social science; Politics; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.027028907633816202,"score_gpt":0.3771953927695604,"score_spread":0.35016648513574417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163576302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31566116,0.010986524,0.0000048991105,0.010852083,0.00069341646,0.0005769632,0.000044583016,0.000028826737,0.6611515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795144,0.015873106,0.0002740588,0.0041689663,0.00008005726,0.0000028172565,6.8228854e-7,0.0000036199722,0.00008226128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984405,0.00011720254,0.00028418255,0.0002376207,0.00060908624,0.00031141206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991771,0.00015731216,0.00014478083,0.00010424799,0.00030008962,0.00011648298],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00464377,0.000088929104,0.00029250028,0.000021543015,0.00069828896,0.000049021433,0.00032430072,0.00012705314,0.000028133103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004993518,0.00007816923,0.00008071061,0.00040884563,0.009009871,0.00066178635,0.000092397575,0.00034498388,0.0000016100067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016854241,0.000023616627,0.0005312868,0.00040739335,0.0000023495113,4.6134153e-7,0.035085943,4.4028305e-9,0.0004968698,0.9613986,0.00006926631,0.001982525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007145532,0.00018341946,0.024627576,0.002781322,0.000081765524,0.0000044317676,0.030053925,0.000003323303,0.00083845615,0.08054735,0.8594633,0.0007005936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032673024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004485623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88085127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020020192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002860051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99368703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164971442","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105412","title":"The Conundrum of Financial Regulation: Origins, Controversies, and Prospects","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Financial regulation; State (computer science); Economics; Financial market; Capitalism; Normative; Financial services; Finance; Law and economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02176178514467731,"score_gpt":0.2599326560834237,"score_spread":0.2381708709387464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164971442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055644,0.062092274,0.000059099115,0.00768644,0.0006614744,0.001160541,0.000014027734,0.000043920892,0.8726382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954645,0.0023446092,0.000023533186,0.0019745377,0.00008847186,0.0000034257773,4.1955468e-7,0.0000014811986,0.00009901064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994659,0.0000048688403,0.00015362482,0.00009701864,0.00017991684,0.00009868569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994716,0.000024288418,0.00017363536,0.000054809767,0.00027041446,0.0000052646947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043725016,0.000049531787,0.00014711179,0.000012802556,0.000526644,0.000028059536,0.00010518725,0.0000116307365,0.000009744831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011385045,0.000032402822,0.000024231746,0.00018381073,0.0011708027,0.0004433261,0.00008314052,0.00002173841,0.0000012822748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005594243,0.000005485782,0.00082223065,0.00035350953,0.0000019666838,8.772497e-8,0.00021307083,3.804825e-9,0.000011787112,0.9918512,0.00062714284,0.0061078803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023766946,0.000022766671,0.17387606,0.0005084564,0.000037846992,5.277334e-7,0.00041616661,0.000011144509,0.000041281437,0.02901207,0.79572767,0.00010835297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013908056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030558367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9628392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000050632875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025876043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43138713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546592032","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102612-134005","title":"Law, Settler Colonialism, and “the Forgotten Space” of Maritime Worlds","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Scholarship; Conversation; Sociology; Power (physics); Mobilities; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Law; History; Social science; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013380373981601423,"score_gpt":0.3172029696579482,"score_spread":0.3038225956763468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546592032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13888344,0.0519378,0.000033121873,0.2820834,0.0010550075,0.002413169,0.000410235,0.0000836891,0.52310014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798288,0.016389456,0.00003860615,0.0030804046,0.00012434689,0.0000105522,4.0005682e-7,0.000004198764,0.0005232738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984054,0.00022989663,0.00027303374,0.00021661549,0.0005692478,0.00030581173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901897,0.0003564667,0.00017923093,0.0001169328,0.00023198366,0.00009643591],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030117515,0.00009462921,0.00036932834,0.000023521123,0.0009124652,0.000040968916,0.000336171,0.000059407965,0.000046355188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025519246,0.00005510721,0.000088016466,0.00032417805,0.010817741,0.0003852387,0.00012009682,0.000059039172,0.0000025450981],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001587641,0.000014625749,0.0001373286,0.00016228844,0.000007382022,7.6235307e-7,0.014167346,1.6668296e-9,0.00004290027,0.9798386,0.0004857237,0.0051271613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081886334,0.00007470763,0.002272946,0.00089912995,0.000092953705,0.0000021703438,0.0010592991,3.8276124e-7,0.00013661716,0.024593702,0.9698711,0.00017813542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041596484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022177417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9693854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002805368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021146187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947183186","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042808","title":"Early US Prison History Beyond Rothman: Revisiting<i>The Discovery of the Asylum</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Institutionalisation; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Sociology; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.008940473026862968,"score_gpt":0.2754228406383092,"score_spread":0.2664823676114462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947183186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21851867,0.07952184,0.000007562074,0.0059727943,0.0010435877,0.0009827918,0.00003335593,0.000021833841,0.69389755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777182,0.011512208,0.000036987058,0.0062917797,0.00026472777,0.0000076632505,4.4248793e-7,0.000006952195,0.004161068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791193,0.00031062315,0.00031363277,0.00025411806,0.0009194934,0.00029017305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988428,0.00014761809,0.00046470313,0.00025101562,0.00023894689,0.000054950622],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030207534,0.00010185024,0.00034517542,0.000012036141,0.0010196886,0.000030124682,0.0007734645,0.00005048909,0.00004017407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021221935,0.00006386826,0.00021873048,0.00041854565,0.0073088105,0.0006018065,0.00012688772,0.00016063824,0.0000058595133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007276386,0.000044772132,0.004716789,0.0012948934,0.000017954437,4.6617015e-7,0.11540249,1.2256675e-7,0.0008557236,0.84882575,0.008867882,0.019965867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006367902,0.000035794437,0.00818353,0.0005589035,0.000033412045,3.1780436e-7,0.0047367965,3.6566408e-7,0.000024300563,0.0002706995,0.9859777,0.00011450989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003023044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006520837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9771098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001832511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061920326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99539274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948008227","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042617","title":"Why Legal Transplants?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Law; Legal research; Comparative law; Corporate governance; Political science; Legal profession; Sociology; Legal pluralism; Law and economics; Economics; Legislature","score_opus":0.027132877778981712,"score_gpt":0.3696892856190225,"score_spread":0.34255640784004077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948008227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02069465,0.009835519,0.000008350112,0.006166822,0.00019722381,0.00020052817,0.000025519015,0.000010991304,0.9628604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790623,0.011886715,0.00001746347,0.008205597,0.00006204459,0.0000031065908,8.6721934e-7,0.0000013947932,0.00076047855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902767,0.000055848504,0.0001373491,0.00013959096,0.000479816,0.00015970509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955225,0.000057755333,0.000059191305,0.000041169384,0.0002508486,0.00003876964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008052704,0.00005095593,0.00017793303,0.00001545109,0.00053209526,0.000027245887,0.00022226578,0.000016342261,0.00016083535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003853237,0.000041019528,0.000050037106,0.00017814386,0.0012737408,0.0004897518,0.00003492371,0.000043910066,0.000017037532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001854101,0.000010090545,0.00013099705,0.00013445159,0.0000039353454,2.6761253e-7,0.004698766,7.209246e-9,0.000050282073,0.9928036,0.001223062,0.00094268785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004574215,0.000028615808,0.0007461818,0.00032628156,0.000007838608,2.9373996e-7,0.0010176605,3.7504304e-7,0.000041974916,0.0008482369,0.9968782,0.000058566504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023467343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004935563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017369275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095541225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4693151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025926069","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-021020-105357","title":"Governing the Belongings of the Precariously Housed: A Critical Legal Geography","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Dignity; Corporate governance; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Face (sociological concept); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Social science","score_opus":0.03167784322938598,"score_gpt":0.40445328858298746,"score_spread":0.37277544535360146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025926069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68272024,0.07735947,0.00009188941,0.08162944,0.0009516502,0.00231288,0.00030735202,0.000090338326,0.15453671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99101776,0.0022888395,0.00001587,0.0065258285,0.00011441708,0.000013620104,3.673801e-7,0.000004882593,0.0000183886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846196,0.00028648783,0.00032927352,0.00015649897,0.00049776054,0.0002680253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999047,0.00030803442,0.00017714757,0.00010139783,0.00029678646,0.000069678674],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001215878,0.00007527216,0.00035707047,0.0000073409983,0.0017115799,0.000012807685,0.0004259215,0.00005308347,0.000026051439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006398573,0.000040305167,0.00011405138,0.00044745172,0.0019383605,0.00019580848,0.00024954206,0.00027760645,0.0000028313416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005781576,0.000019232863,0.0054806476,0.0034422479,0.000009497933,6.2986237e-7,0.15960377,3.0944843e-8,0.00006972829,0.8271566,0.00014406264,0.0040677367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006248291,0.00032163598,0.09403072,0.010225661,0.00034860094,5.7698816e-7,0.19634818,0.000023263592,0.00019593585,0.003390351,0.6939522,0.00053807435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021469947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024328081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8237663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011435043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023592447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043684371","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-051920-020619","title":"Constitutions and the Metropolis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Polity; Megacity; Sovereignty; Urbanization; Sociology; Constitutional theory; Corporate governance; Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Constitution; Law; Politics; Economics; Economic growth; Economy","score_opus":0.02606111916851503,"score_gpt":0.35051885259580495,"score_spread":0.3244577334272899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043684371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033263525,0.018102724,0.00009700426,0.05792897,0.00005739658,0.0001902043,0.00005817145,0.000012866784,0.92322004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95622915,0.0150369955,0.00007638738,0.0284797,0.0001079425,0.000003308042,5.7544503e-7,9.318841e-7,0.00006499425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991395,0.00012167381,0.00013755899,0.00011472968,0.0003229517,0.00016358586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994229,0.00016937625,0.00006876799,0.00003907262,0.00017935423,0.000120496275],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009536962,0.00004754964,0.00017657997,0.0000076151023,0.0016375075,0.000032037948,0.00018304076,0.000017981069,0.000030294748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059379055,0.000031214662,0.000040446754,0.0002855738,0.0303104,0.00020701454,0.000068114154,0.000061236584,0.0000025446366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001736574,0.0000025633096,0.00001730968,0.00006905741,0.0000027702702,2.5807282e-7,0.0036478809,8.281945e-9,0.0000020194284,0.9952189,0.00032473076,0.00071277644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009627903,0.000011810046,0.000037688842,0.000075752534,0.000031984237,9.029404e-7,0.0029511775,7.647354e-7,0.0000030310239,0.0024515516,0.9942888,0.000050261202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026708918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005512142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000130734325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007849035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188254323","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-111720-012237","title":"On the Interdependence of Liberal and Illiberal/Authoritarian Legal Forms in Racial Capitalist Regimes…The Case of the United States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Political science; Law; Liberal democracy; Sociology; Legal pluralism; State (computer science); Legal realism; Law and economics; Legal profession; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.012373820389813463,"score_gpt":0.3100137420940892,"score_spread":0.2976399217042758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3188254323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91613656,0.011513137,0.0000038789094,0.019451024,0.00024772531,0.0004821372,0.0000870749,0.000007854496,0.052070603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99181145,0.0052899187,0.00001885465,0.0024486934,0.00003470449,0.000005423136,0.0000012741161,0.0000033866404,0.0003862933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984475,0.00040782036,0.00030431515,0.00019344251,0.00042826985,0.00021869253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988221,0.0004088459,0.00025933838,0.00016606294,0.00029367508,0.000049972496],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019638606,0.000089819565,0.00026471706,0.000018797558,0.0012461469,0.00003655729,0.00039917004,0.000042210795,0.000017874028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006037577,0.000048076377,0.00010089181,0.0008626466,0.007938288,0.0002765216,0.00013061099,0.00017850564,2.1915753e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052922314,0.00003358337,0.00007790187,0.00014335822,0.0000062195354,0.0000105489535,0.117885046,3.2507404e-7,0.00003592841,0.87862945,0.00068635977,0.0024859803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006807979,0.00037901502,0.004048322,0.003529003,0.00016882105,0.00007840222,0.55124396,0.000065287415,0.00053093804,0.04216063,0.39646998,0.00064482965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015008876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050529195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8364688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004587867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037255496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245285958","doi":"10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900","title":"Governmentality","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":988,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Sociology; Michel foucault; Government (linguistics); Politics; The arts; Creativity; Perspective (graphical); Power (physics); Corporate governance; Analytics; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Law; Economics; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020565228498493675,"score_gpt":0.3693690396814392,"score_spread":0.3488038111829455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245285958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052643246,0.0100968955,0.0000063162433,0.0058964523,0.00018963192,0.00014874806,0.00002995743,0.000019315543,0.9783484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98335516,0.011282161,0.000059693855,0.004223884,0.00016046067,0.000002858809,0.000001473976,0.0000025229353,0.0009117528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843067,0.00010410799,0.00019599321,0.00017197279,0.0008390011,0.0002582367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952394,0.0000633018,0.00010378621,0.000072798364,0.0001726087,0.0000635481],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002464907,0.000061349565,0.00017105564,0.000009307749,0.0011179494,0.00003843579,0.00025768866,0.000049976883,0.00005569198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015643504,0.000053172495,0.000056895165,0.00026183334,0.003833393,0.00038746954,0.00006141041,0.000079092286,0.000007688233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.053371e-7,0.000021709764,0.00015624023,0.00019773499,9.4483676e-7,4.3984218e-7,0.0048999614,5.3026965e-9,0.000031240732,0.9913588,0.001224175,0.0021079355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051569332,0.000017643591,0.0021675713,0.00025267046,0.000013247479,3.3753042e-7,0.0030044816,2.0045216e-7,0.000050274757,0.012078906,0.9822647,0.0000984036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009048816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010939605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98104054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059746082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002032315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379114724","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-050520-101947","title":"COVID-19 and the Data Governance Gap","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Data governance; Accountability; Corporate governance; License; Legitimacy; Political science; Public relations; General Data Protection Regulation; Data Protection Act 1998; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Data quality; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.07542546694434564,"score_gpt":0.38142233987007035,"score_spread":0.3059968729257247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379114724","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053844093,0.22341894,0.022342062,0.5136862,0.0014572826,0.0035298322,0.0008892814,0.0008824534,0.22840954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9218961,0.026472248,0.00023223263,0.051209882,0.000046562036,0.000008840389,0.000003548936,0.0000040971927,0.00012648673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855083,0.00007298781,0.00021021455,0.00040868655,0.00052353763,0.00023376073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865425,0.00051050104,0.00012706702,0.00049253635,0.000084154715,0.0001314817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033434604,0.00008292798,0.00022265957,0.000017559703,0.0005717461,0.00017015515,0.001818457,0.000017863034,0.0000024187493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001704206,0.00005483647,0.000031206877,0.0008329254,0.0013999055,0.0016291888,0.0017708266,0.00007394202,0.0000063430375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017173676,0.0000035559187,0.000019513567,0.0007707204,0.0000021558178,0.0000032665241,0.0015382057,9.055239e-8,0.00000859198,0.9782322,0.0010868277,0.018333137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006628237,0.000055660174,0.0028004355,0.0010870039,0.00002869024,0.0000167409,0.00024594445,0.0016376248,0.000019945588,0.02907534,0.9640513,0.0003184844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003977721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005135608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9629645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028919434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045686992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.515801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400725596","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-041822-030149","title":"Abortion Law Illiberalism and Feminist Politics in Comparative Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Politics; Abortion; Law; Political science; Sociology; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.03903105093705932,"score_gpt":0.40153405244315177,"score_spread":0.36250300150609244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400725596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014241891,0.08142002,0.0000031733377,0.008054689,0.00015978012,0.00020759941,0.000052810505,0.000019161682,0.8958409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825581,0.014892245,0.000016224938,0.002374745,0.00009855761,0.000005691695,5.9289385e-7,0.0000011199942,0.000052730855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910295,0.00006563558,0.00015211884,0.00018132658,0.00031631795,0.00018162232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996101,0.00008266854,0.00003363828,0.000024143405,0.00019778677,0.000051621548],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007674925,0.00006114732,0.00019399128,0.00002376086,0.0009608448,0.00005882946,0.00008539638,0.000027484974,0.000006637248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004624291,0.0000509534,0.00002955109,0.0003607054,0.0064200084,0.00030794984,0.000050069113,0.00007242532,0.0000022607308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.458858e-7,0.000010827228,0.00002949187,0.000085094674,0.0000036802232,0.0000016513665,0.04675639,7.0475994e-9,0.0000047357357,0.9527028,0.00006629483,0.0003382841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098692944,0.000055497683,0.002321122,0.0018647618,0.000041104064,0.0000022827737,0.06762128,0.000002369038,0.000018294642,0.32168838,0.6060845,0.00020166309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020887168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030177967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9683162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007889165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022901026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99628395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411599541","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-062124-121908","title":"Law, Empires, Legal Professions, and Status Hierarchies: Comparative Perspectives","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal status; Empirical legal studies; Political science; Law; Legal pluralism; Legal profession; Law and economics; Legal realism; Sociology","score_opus":0.04568850723392285,"score_gpt":0.4741606614625519,"score_spread":0.42847215422862905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411599541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007697575,0.023955137,0.000011100437,0.059470437,0.00020783383,0.0003788881,0.000029883813,0.000020893382,0.9082283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759496,0.01489002,0.00019322074,0.007357586,0.00004916021,0.000015792397,0.0000021485362,0.0000015135442,0.0015410032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878263,0.0002693508,0.00020641924,0.0002008352,0.00032107852,0.00021965793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989264,0.00026742177,0.00011922667,0.00007090829,0.0005401484,0.0000759232],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014857427,0.00006867823,0.00019667011,0.000051906205,0.0023144018,0.00013606256,0.00016131568,0.000034059616,0.000043468503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000539456,0.000057482965,0.000025846006,0.00077947206,0.004225311,0.0012547909,0.00007187608,0.0001813118,0.0000017103148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030711617,0.00003640408,0.000066066495,0.00013856507,0.0000050203107,1.2295635e-7,0.10402008,3.1691632e-9,0.000012152963,0.8922047,0.0016304938,0.0018833309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063459665,0.000017183786,0.001270286,0.00038708173,0.000016256357,1.9954209e-7,0.11051821,3.3857526e-7,0.0000116686715,0.005934951,0.88171476,0.000065620734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00755667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012854397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.968252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050561175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001433807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412019854","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-061824-073536","title":"Technologies of Criminalization","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.021914084667073275,"score_gpt":0.33068988455352516,"score_spread":0.3087757998864519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412019854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17500813,0.030660748,0.0010859034,0.020188008,0.00014945882,0.0004637481,0.000017006552,0.000094858195,0.77233213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922078,0.0043898267,0.00013150339,0.0031429522,0.0000011082482,0.0000025005497,5.928155e-7,5.8959455e-7,0.00012309938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995241,0.000018761591,0.00014872519,0.000104806284,0.00013219134,0.000071394265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997871,0.00002140636,0.000074625495,0.00006775665,0.00004169894,0.000007400356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033117243,0.000035477817,0.00011941918,0.000021995756,0.00014540284,0.0000030962715,0.00017449676,0.000026609125,0.000055744524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014330269,0.000028500617,0.000023107992,0.00036763385,0.0022073893,0.00015066072,0.000121777106,0.000026340926,0.0000023754176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002472176,0.00003090931,0.008142532,0.00073202926,0.000004722828,2.2443027e-7,0.00062591466,2.7933473e-7,0.0015582715,0.94601023,0.0018259739,0.041066427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004584406,0.00022681347,0.23356166,0.00393611,0.0004459076,0.0000045292063,0.009079437,0.00006570971,0.03442754,0.06367191,0.65360636,0.0005155791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013619525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012995937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88233835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009537171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021548025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81332177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415107733","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-061824-080455","title":"The Fiscal Politics of Settler Colonialism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Colonialism; Framing (construction); Indigenous; State (computer science); Possession (linguistics)","score_opus":0.022559020231498483,"score_gpt":0.38546239740384386,"score_spread":0.3629033771723454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415107733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004773152,0.051549826,0.000013669894,0.05892368,0.0003758215,0.0002720697,0.000026391699,0.0000104784895,0.8840549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9206411,0.073737636,0.000018755356,0.0044852295,0.00006407537,0.00000360712,2.6490994e-7,9.314853e-7,0.0010483874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904585,0.000099554025,0.00020260498,0.00010624808,0.0003239104,0.00022182184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936205,0.00020681976,0.0000880569,0.000058135516,0.0002486759,0.00003626801],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011606845,0.000046933317,0.00019185967,0.0000081288945,0.0029472914,0.000019638193,0.0002844233,0.00003705226,0.000025794707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035551473,0.000026788106,0.000056297475,0.00031552181,0.010799261,0.00009172662,0.000121123296,0.00005224472,8.530541e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.467177e-7,0.000010552174,0.00006065431,0.000092592956,0.0000037610398,1.2042337e-7,0.0027852727,1.6320839e-9,0.000004411683,0.9901783,0.0024845256,0.00437885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034932833,0.00003281923,0.0014284429,0.00021381285,0.00001588857,5.2881546e-8,0.005198185,2.2520706e-7,0.000027012644,0.021332163,0.97167766,0.00003882839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018812269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027177352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9691931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022639446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014528999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99835074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}