{"meta":{"query_hash":"9b1e4f6f07ca","filters":{"venue":"Annual Review of Sociology"},"cohort_total":23,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":23,"exported":23,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/9b1e4f6f07ca","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Annual+Review+of+Sociology"},"results":[{"id":"W1943240870","doi":"10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112352","title":"Cycles of Sameness and Difference in LGBT Social Movements","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Scholarship; Mainstream; Queer; Transgender; Gender studies; Social movement; Sociology; Feminism; Identity (music); Political science; Politics; Law; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.042356020712853854,"score_gpt":0.42167754050048645,"score_spread":0.3793215197876326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1943240870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37104166,0.34181273,0.0055912775,0.10311175,0.0015057792,0.00014786677,0.00019722301,0.00003736722,0.17655437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8860157,0.10300335,0.0015459667,0.0051568286,0.00030602145,0.00010645234,0.00007705034,0.00001889576,0.0037698455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630356,0.002648586,0.00013539533,0.0002892825,0.00038265745,0.0002404463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99503595,0.003239361,0.0008926766,0.00017359409,0.00032314635,0.0003352051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036778166,0.0001711818,0.00035282993,0.0021280795,0.0028628348,0.0057640434,0.00062149146,0.0014371633,0.0029496609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006765261,0.00016382516,0.00029025518,0.0027903083,0.015507491,0.0053350437,0.0033625735,0.0016705603,0.0001802659],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005825643,0.00007650823,0.016837917,0.0026307537,0.000053173957,0.0006407942,0.18825899,0.0002548513,0.0005344256,0.52240163,0.006814944,0.26143774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017949656,0.000117835494,0.050825093,0.008240861,0.000056664026,0.001018507,0.2967623,0.00022139474,0.0004857191,0.21539369,0.42680904,0.000051043193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068740477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013348006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068740477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005274905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051084603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03827232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070928948","doi":"10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150050","title":"The Contemporary American Conservative Movement","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Scholarship; Transformative learning; Sociology; Politics; Movement (music); Social movement; Political economy; Social science; Political science; Law; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.11029245621482875,"score_gpt":0.4071859402469915,"score_spread":0.29689348403216276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070928948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1467585,0.026918381,0.0007809185,0.08451134,0.001454734,0.000014488123,0.000054615586,0.000022348195,0.7394848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91419876,0.012763564,0.00028041383,0.01471541,0.0013882347,0.000038999555,0.000048905997,0.000016087162,0.0565497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989157,0.00043776585,0.000014298893,0.00013488387,0.00022194417,0.0002753868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999483,0.00017182052,0.00006921432,0.00003314523,0.000089051624,0.00015381254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015580568,0.0001633843,0.0001605354,0.001191179,0.007356174,0.004770776,0.00030436568,0.0017994771,0.0047419583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001650109,0.000075867494,0.00007730119,0.0018316872,0.009399825,0.0019237367,0.0016707743,0.0019075386,0.0004469425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017641914,0.000043164426,0.0032377413,0.00005970192,0.0000034934203,0.00012349308,0.031286884,0.000056462253,0.00022984821,0.87615424,0.040466804,0.048320692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004673459,0.000017722901,0.0099295955,0.0001736082,0.000003785498,0.00010434363,0.020816159,0.00007890758,0.00006952428,0.07017067,0.8986214,0.000009584753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016455475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024526594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016455475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003910449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032999262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032719374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123480322","doi":"10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145605","title":"Gender and Crime","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":291,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Subject (documents); Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Gender studies; Criminology; Generalization; Sociological research; Doing gender; Work (physics); Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.0337912778073379,"score_gpt":0.3682262927585076,"score_spread":0.3344350149511697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123480322","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032385949,0.91458833,0.0010347657,0.01815835,0.0038575416,0.000012095987,0.00010538537,0.000012974983,0.058991965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06946439,0.901891,0.00070627406,0.0088065,0.003799118,0.000049671005,0.00014564159,0.00003588439,0.015101518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981664,0.00085419376,0.00011462787,0.00024169,0.00042664298,0.00019645528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838066,0.0008841715,0.00019816877,0.000098352175,0.00032063614,0.000117977266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016123418,0.0005964504,0.00097172015,0.00392885,0.0019619893,0.004120858,0.00078892836,0.0017378977,0.009607728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039606015,0.00018358807,0.00037198534,0.0040442017,0.0067943293,0.0037152644,0.0024595193,0.0015711272,0.0015785273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004421533,0.000043332017,0.0035792484,0.0024623415,0.00006487906,0.00036469268,0.006849586,0.0002578134,0.00018023525,0.4978713,0.13130665,0.35697576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002240605,0.000026711843,0.003138757,0.003247161,0.000013081148,0.0006841105,0.004558165,0.000029791827,0.00006949887,0.052742653,0.93547195,0.000015891763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073250663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008527986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009607728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019038753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002745907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03214109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131047368","doi":"10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134631","title":"Nonparametric Methods for Modeling Nonlinearity in Regression Analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Advanced Statistical Methods and Models","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nonparametric regression; Generalized additive model; Nonparametric statistics; Smoothing; Additive model; Generalized linear model; Mathematics; Categorical variable; Semiparametric regression; Linear model; Multivariate statistics; Parametric statistics; Functional data analysis; General linear model; Regression analysis; Applied mathematics; Econometrics; Statistics","score_opus":0.17341117019378202,"score_gpt":0.5808928409708659,"score_spread":0.40748167077708386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131047368","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00054205174,0.001299155,0.99616003,0.00028458826,0.00012399809,0.000064763946,0.00016679324,0.0003311886,0.0010273203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04874228,0.0055681323,0.93676513,0.0005072374,0.00094847864,0.0018288709,0.0009582342,0.000744189,0.003937434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97643024,0.017060274,0.0009464119,0.0018131866,0.0034267828,0.00032309783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9331033,0.055845395,0.0029659315,0.0049391505,0.0028690607,0.00027713587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024018519,0.0021074123,0.0028433234,0.004344069,0.0011570763,0.0031174733,0.0042500603,0.0027842845,0.008062514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09800157,0.0012044727,0.0031253758,0.0064109764,0.0033248777,0.0036744464,0.003509312,0.006368538,0.0028891044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010497775,0.00013244033,0.0036888388,0.0014018895,0.00075541105,0.00034291457,0.0007247306,0.16674633,0.0010337965,0.5401196,0.01997361,0.26497555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047371173,0.00009510368,0.0013665387,0.00036349279,0.00012207757,0.0002499946,0.00015317158,0.41186103,0.00061092246,0.54608667,0.03893332,0.000110405235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005613498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004270002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024018519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001962841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037335076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12702352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133343061","doi":"10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.337","title":"The Scale of Justice: Observations on the Transformation of Urban Law Practice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prestige; Competition (biology); Economic Justice; Business; Quarter (Canadian coin); Legal profession; Market power; Scale (ratio); Practice of law; Financial services; Legal service; Service (business); Law; Accounting; Market economy; Political science; Economics; Finance; Marketing; Geography","score_opus":0.052036157903803205,"score_gpt":0.3215288489460494,"score_spread":0.26949269104224616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133343061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91496474,0.0017144463,0.0011094128,0.013002651,0.000056888264,0.000054912194,0.00010013772,0.00003320026,0.068963565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965323,0.00043692425,0.00017300303,0.00042415768,0.000024785191,0.000023185437,0.000029553443,0.000012797817,0.0023432504],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934481,0.0034470484,0.00016296125,0.00044212377,0.0012880507,0.0012117848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98455185,0.0064716805,0.0036189663,0.0013439264,0.0019512343,0.0020624625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033766944,0.00013607345,0.00031487833,0.003220659,0.008523771,0.0045330343,0.0013744025,0.0013071925,0.003537128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020236738,0.000362916,0.00017958756,0.00530397,0.021712413,0.0036111288,0.0096000405,0.0026476195,0.00038411646],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039003506,0.000113971306,0.04041289,0.00009002993,0.000010022108,0.00046769538,0.85234904,0.0001910086,0.000474002,0.054695666,0.006813721,0.044342835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011636749,0.00006483554,0.1685165,0.00016318222,0.0000047230637,0.00024650947,0.6933573,0.0002507018,0.00028144452,0.010278861,0.12678422,0.000040122384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04016934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0800521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04016934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006205263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042161103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07987106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145828746","doi":"10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122246","title":"Multiethnic Cities in North America","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Geography; Ethnically diverse; Economic geography; Urban landscape; Demography; Demographic economics; Sociology; Environmental planning; Anthropology","score_opus":0.03201810617747502,"score_gpt":0.35413340412296135,"score_spread":0.3221152979454863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145828746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.574409,0.18912031,0.00074388896,0.025890084,0.00076007494,0.00005764195,0.0005273121,0.000051802537,0.20843993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92385817,0.06364463,0.0005986882,0.001863568,0.0002991308,0.000059669466,0.00026504352,0.000008796991,0.009402377],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965787,0.00013593852,0.000019314964,0.000061395,0.00006986939,0.00005567457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993598,0.00009081994,0.00016735215,0.000030503461,0.0001533798,0.00019815797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037614346,0.00012776528,0.00017576366,0.0010659584,0.0025421022,0.0020124854,0.00027981054,0.00043818756,0.0037812986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007408938,0.000087446366,0.000098697485,0.0028495546,0.00073804933,0.0009946887,0.002022006,0.00037696928,0.0002154016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011279272,0.00023863945,0.29217392,0.001873954,0.00019649089,0.0027000513,0.072972246,0.0008459092,0.0015276545,0.11193521,0.071568936,0.44385418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010698002,0.000049804432,0.6057828,0.0008248046,0.000056736233,0.0008788419,0.04143026,0.00027878257,0.00011071632,0.009856934,0.34069264,0.000027012044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05178607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16909796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94821393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015643798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018905496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10296929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147266353","doi":"10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.479","title":"Hate Crime: An Emergent Research Agenda","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":254,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Politics; Task (project management); Data collection; Population; Data science; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.25703949516294816,"score_gpt":0.5477262221446134,"score_spread":0.29068672698166526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147266353","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040070213,0.14285319,0.015611513,0.7573118,0.0038235628,0.0001895891,0.00070392207,0.00006874174,0.03936758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58357006,0.3236634,0.014490225,0.056259833,0.015352951,0.00053679803,0.00081443216,0.00009552469,0.0052168393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99142843,0.004999093,0.0004189075,0.0013426426,0.0011398561,0.00067118555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9222795,0.0628512,0.0028535645,0.0026254645,0.007015401,0.0023747522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024858966,0.0008062783,0.0026504516,0.008022575,0.0059708473,0.016791314,0.0030761857,0.0071090623,0.0056528817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04224645,0.0004721885,0.0006332896,0.010528332,0.02870319,0.036710605,0.0064169653,0.008036003,0.00064131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052413357,0.00015877717,0.020922191,0.0012566437,0.000044541943,0.0005034162,0.010715304,0.00060618564,0.00013378912,0.8386327,0.02913577,0.09783826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015869144,0.00008923479,0.01853798,0.004305046,0.000031450436,0.0009334556,0.07084381,0.0026023136,0.0001637052,0.779492,0.122902766,0.000082316306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071679107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007702667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024858966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074540153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008684623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13146836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150807908","doi":"10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.21","title":"Double Standards for Competence: Theory and Research","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":591,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Inference; Psychology; Morality; Social psychology; Personality; Ethnic group; Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.06660733072379403,"score_gpt":0.5137846154815854,"score_spread":0.44717728475779134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150807908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19217637,0.05584025,0.15523323,0.03200753,0.0007282021,0.00025588297,0.00018434832,0.00014484781,0.5634293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97297454,0.009888924,0.013490336,0.0013053236,0.000260887,0.00015392348,0.000058138856,0.00004009349,0.0018278544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845607,0.0066481866,0.0011029295,0.0028340772,0.0040371944,0.00081687997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92326593,0.058942284,0.006687927,0.0048934445,0.004389062,0.0018213145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011033034,0.000853051,0.0009895641,0.005121836,0.002696353,0.008784509,0.0016919127,0.003102796,0.004378144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048048142,0.0005895127,0.00055020634,0.0038638387,0.046244364,0.012195202,0.0071955114,0.0050293393,0.0005017909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014180111,0.000042022053,0.003683535,0.000249624,0.000015298398,0.00008359611,0.004663806,0.0005465362,0.00012387455,0.9586409,0.0005597424,0.031376805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010109069,0.000035294113,0.0040218295,0.00056213554,0.00000942179,0.00019181987,0.0027884434,0.0010649838,0.00022976362,0.98093194,0.010124994,0.00002928542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028263733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013079577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011033034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042289905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035876313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058348954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151191189","doi":"10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131752","title":"The Sociology of the Radical Right","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":862,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political radicalism; Radical right; Aside; Ideology; Politics; Right wing; Focus (optics); Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01624769039649167,"score_gpt":0.36455779646372055,"score_spread":0.3483101060672289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151191189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034427322,0.10187136,0.010094016,0.10626137,0.0017742881,0.000031037274,0.00008609436,0.000028648614,0.74542594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91416657,0.04020731,0.0017106205,0.013079141,0.002382369,0.00005872712,0.000049638795,0.000035036144,0.028310644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978727,0.0012735403,0.00003570029,0.00026526625,0.00029172192,0.00026108717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979613,0.0013691019,0.00016592673,0.00016731936,0.00013257287,0.0002037919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025753728,0.00030364544,0.00036411683,0.0014421317,0.00375271,0.0041584154,0.0004882663,0.0023526263,0.0038145178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00291871,0.00016139522,0.00023011057,0.0011880712,0.033362485,0.003914638,0.0031775904,0.0030029435,0.0005791578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002806242,0.0000030782232,0.00016055634,0.000025827781,0.0000017324587,0.000025299498,0.0015578411,0.00006261537,0.000028190356,0.9915799,0.0026387777,0.0039134254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009607941,0.000010935829,0.0006591003,0.00013531631,0.0000021566293,0.0000875103,0.0015775727,0.00010479715,0.000031083957,0.7895274,0.20784895,0.0000055243945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030704732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002437266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041584154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00317124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002189915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023009002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153787751","doi":"10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115933","title":"Men, Masculinity, and Manhood Acts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Gender Roles and Identity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":723,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Masculinity; Deference; Construct (python library); Gender studies; Strengths and weaknesses; Trait; Politics; Sociology; Inequality; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.025096049999497536,"score_gpt":0.36100630650684046,"score_spread":0.3359102565073429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153787751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5196966,0.090394266,0.003872084,0.018587058,0.0005358916,0.000036619273,0.000056392455,0.000024218427,0.3667969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801553,0.00992658,0.0004536606,0.0007241665,0.00020043102,0.000015736623,0.000013198331,0.000007177984,0.008503772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975044,0.0016675629,0.00006227737,0.00021982261,0.0003384719,0.00020744835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828005,0.0010168188,0.0003566682,0.00006283397,0.000100047764,0.00018359495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026026815,0.00041489417,0.00035310048,0.0014568979,0.004033309,0.004057942,0.0004968617,0.0008611095,0.0034150095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025646335,0.00014718343,0.00011427289,0.0013390565,0.022597563,0.003074756,0.00290487,0.0010070297,0.000288768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040950916,0.000039692386,0.009942484,0.00014460778,0.00001103239,0.0002932855,0.17588693,0.000069727386,0.0002749388,0.7715801,0.00150204,0.04021416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013288765,0.00019653341,0.04573047,0.00077475957,0.000027152704,0.0011717211,0.29622573,0.00021451214,0.00071070716,0.31621158,0.3386707,0.000052709278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038325835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055598794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004057942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001652815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010638487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013764441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159333197","doi":"10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134608","title":"Citizenship and Immigration: Multiculturalism, Assimilation, and Challenges to the Nation-State","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":644,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Stryker","keywords":"Citizenship; Multiculturalism; Sovereignty; Immigration; Normative; Politics; Nation state; Sociology; Political science; State (computer science); Gender studies; Identity (music); Political economy; National identity; Ethnic group; Global citizenship; Law","score_opus":0.05899978425332381,"score_gpt":0.33156955497827156,"score_spread":0.27256977072494776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159333197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32269567,0.26674777,0.0028687953,0.1750366,0.0014712653,0.000033529283,0.000033319157,0.000025491292,0.23108768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92583925,0.06470822,0.000662521,0.0040736957,0.0005858331,0.000030928375,0.000016219154,0.000007576607,0.004075765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739754,0.0019465906,0.00007840303,0.00015892404,0.00021258337,0.00020597155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982551,0.0009841885,0.00023645969,0.00008130132,0.00014183464,0.0003011403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027128186,0.00025075607,0.0005261134,0.0014910713,0.005758537,0.007502041,0.0004834696,0.0016450641,0.001930147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028017766,0.00012882875,0.00023701189,0.0026770222,0.022837363,0.0058962144,0.0061755967,0.0021414603,0.00014809087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029153942,0.000071679686,0.014843789,0.00061046553,0.000025599134,0.0012726884,0.15540409,0.00021870108,0.00022963982,0.6991108,0.0067311344,0.12145228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012057486,0.000083427076,0.028326508,0.003124815,0.000027897915,0.001742428,0.38037288,0.00034345684,0.0001615511,0.34793696,0.23781852,0.000049452992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053706397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008860808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007502041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023612506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040944736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017132163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165751104","doi":"10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145630","title":"Multiculturalism and Immigration: A Contested Field in Cross-National Comparison","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":289,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal De Heus","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Immigration; Politics; Socioeconomic status; Political science; Sociocultural evolution; Sociology; Development economics; Law; Economics; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.026124577179208144,"score_gpt":0.3991899086185766,"score_spread":0.3730653314393685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165751104","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37728485,0.5199653,0.0037720418,0.021266842,0.0020257847,0.00008678612,0.00016675453,0.000020684856,0.075410925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8355501,0.15742369,0.0022797596,0.0021786492,0.00069559977,0.00010613008,0.00012842182,0.000022155265,0.001615535],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98770636,0.009198246,0.0006303485,0.000604945,0.0012839404,0.00057605986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703326,0.024414841,0.0020354001,0.00093642913,0.001598866,0.00068193884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01586251,0.00031562313,0.0012387106,0.005186189,0.002633829,0.0066592065,0.0008509864,0.00091404346,0.0027944457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024210155,0.00019520566,0.00054832426,0.0073216246,0.008833521,0.0067487857,0.0063527613,0.0013689043,0.000146096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017897092,0.00016356545,0.10854828,0.008717541,0.00092024734,0.0010365177,0.18617404,0.00056824984,0.0003312826,0.2503067,0.0046725287,0.4383821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003005826,0.00037169104,0.24103142,0.02225627,0.00045175644,0.0012698735,0.5055471,0.00037061906,0.0004929098,0.09197154,0.13609584,0.00011098792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005852779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010679235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01586251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029575117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038808363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08388996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801195482","doi":"10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041429","title":"Interpreting and Understanding Logits, Probits, and Other Nonlinear Probability Models","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":467,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Nonlinear system; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.17040188194184658,"score_gpt":0.41566676713982587,"score_spread":0.2452648851979793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801195482","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010642784,0.055053484,0.8558433,0.034031127,0.0010949693,0.00014689619,0.00079447724,0.0003981483,0.041994907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39435577,0.13444473,0.4408166,0.007100939,0.0032625452,0.00071712467,0.0007448253,0.0004677482,0.018089678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99005604,0.007182468,0.00051410915,0.0005965923,0.0013257947,0.00032504005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9620664,0.03405087,0.0015149716,0.00091119227,0.0012479745,0.00020848241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01669966,0.0013048608,0.001286113,0.0042292695,0.0010296204,0.006872459,0.0027637542,0.0031328993,0.004190981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04633198,0.0007931643,0.001258281,0.005044766,0.0074878987,0.009881339,0.0028098593,0.00494749,0.0012153566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009933437,0.000023979075,0.0012452544,0.00042852145,0.000033230997,0.0001826057,0.0013322942,0.009538923,0.000099908815,0.9548017,0.004653484,0.027650114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033893425,0.000010195862,0.0005950178,0.00035256494,0.000012798602,0.00011017329,0.00069693255,0.011239514,0.00013091853,0.95956504,0.02725962,0.000023820465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010352229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006558323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01669966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033711465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038015659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088317275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802500124","doi":"10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041059","title":"On Becoming a Mathematical Demographer—And the Career in Problem-Focused Inquiry that Followed","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Global Maternal and Child Health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ohio State University; University of Manitoba; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Scholarship; Work (physics); Sociology; Population; Fertility; Psychological intervention; Developing country; Economic growth; Public relations; Social science; Political science; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.04108024291649377,"score_gpt":0.3492567424736705,"score_spread":0.30817649955717674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802500124","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003663092,0.045248657,0.046907656,0.86094666,0.012688563,0.00010421786,0.000110245135,0.00015982364,0.030171158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26882908,0.12376366,0.13613497,0.3861434,0.029681591,0.0014516774,0.00027007196,0.0012102528,0.05251533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9744907,0.018775702,0.0007496899,0.0017163993,0.0034863916,0.0007811556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92841834,0.051605877,0.0030972692,0.0041376855,0.0067283167,0.0060125105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038128793,0.0009049704,0.0015855324,0.0031699592,0.0069530345,0.012076463,0.0021392014,0.0057380544,0.005786555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07974869,0.0007665707,0.0010304463,0.0029475999,0.063226156,0.025247212,0.010351482,0.022474878,0.0032408915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003018942,0.000072795476,0.0009862615,0.00032476778,0.00003398278,0.00022411211,0.021879597,0.00057611667,0.00017207279,0.77797467,0.1713879,0.02633746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027987271,0.00005027241,0.0005213293,0.0013517288,0.000009014877,0.00040686555,0.009685236,0.00061898935,0.00010749274,0.34891018,0.63825196,0.000059009224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035698407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038632886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038128793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060032597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007836535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20164675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941829797","doi":"10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022424","title":"Divergent Destinies: Children of Immigrants Growing Up in the United States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Assimilation (phonology); Sociology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Positive economics; Political science; History; Law; Economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.015671645267635852,"score_gpt":0.32814845431509165,"score_spread":0.3124768090474558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941829797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9086277,0.05617511,0.00021189135,0.01986698,0.00038471675,0.00005435627,0.0006125496,0.000009351875,0.014057378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8885635,0.1021513,0.0004128422,0.0044187084,0.0002155854,0.00008794399,0.00043100162,0.000013570768,0.0037056678],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993624,0.00020646432,0.000049606097,0.000080065176,0.00011585134,0.00018575527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984982,0.00054261746,0.00043170442,0.0000462567,0.00019946996,0.0002817066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020660039,0.00036032838,0.0006448885,0.0011692529,0.0055516753,0.0036268374,0.00070972316,0.0016688514,0.003632454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005933859,0.00034598733,0.00035535154,0.001976501,0.0035873572,0.003919594,0.0052445554,0.0030351833,0.00028686994],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011379504,0.00013656878,0.17907295,0.0009844253,0.00006496529,0.0051500252,0.68038523,0.000095552,0.00040569552,0.014637947,0.011581343,0.10737153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000082013175,0.00010496695,0.13324529,0.0019234411,0.000051903422,0.0025264488,0.81254804,0.000035167774,0.00011028741,0.0027800284,0.0466209,0.000045307075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063225895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13745466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063225895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031003528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005071808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12571573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943392229","doi":"10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022433","title":"Technology, Work, and Family: Digital Cultural Capital and Boundary Management","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Social capital; Cultural capital; Sociology; Boundary (topology); Capital (architecture); Power (physics); Inequality; Boundary-work; Knowledge management; Public relations; Political science; Engineering; Social science; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.01325034295740233,"score_gpt":0.3021646951660955,"score_spread":0.28891435220869316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943392229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3029021,0.09064374,0.033774793,0.15513174,0.0013432249,0.000103122926,0.00012709862,0.000057511894,0.41591674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725001,0.01604983,0.0028917603,0.002389969,0.0003335534,0.00005358923,0.000022684551,0.000012828181,0.005745728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717003,0.0019087358,0.00007858289,0.00023350873,0.00026595787,0.000343286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957073,0.0026875057,0.0004913673,0.00023989686,0.00016504846,0.00070893706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034036231,0.00031192094,0.00039452803,0.0021049369,0.007089397,0.009670011,0.0011442236,0.0030324433,0.00563344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00546095,0.00019875001,0.00023127855,0.002026307,0.032740742,0.010728435,0.0070613073,0.0023467534,0.0003476289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021598205,0.00005112707,0.0036686833,0.00011073197,0.000010128069,0.0004389325,0.06007493,0.0003237166,0.00015470978,0.89499557,0.0028622923,0.037287585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015725083,0.000067017936,0.0067784297,0.0008874148,0.000012076345,0.00092437095,0.13498606,0.00052787294,0.00021204907,0.63503873,0.22050518,0.000044906785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059467177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051327134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009670011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003931803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004233806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028527379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945721691","doi":"10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022616","title":"Analyzing Age-Period-Cohort Data: A Review and Critique","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":238,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proxy (statistics); Estimator; Identification (biology); Computer science; Period (music); Econometrics; Data science; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Machine learning; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3147610839769292,"score_gpt":0.5422054257882711,"score_spread":0.22744434181134193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945721691","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013417627,0.9932973,0.0016412254,0.0036797377,0.0005459676,0.000015338213,0.0001258472,0.000011167645,0.0005492454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028426852,0.9918277,0.0018847706,0.0020606683,0.0010147296,0.00006720225,0.00012082835,0.00002084097,0.00016054319],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798493,0.009936582,0.0027764852,0.002667075,0.0045115263,0.00025907232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64379066,0.32805058,0.006645102,0.005611311,0.015182878,0.0007194534],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05745877,0.0012268394,0.004422735,0.011508844,0.0010035167,0.0030706574,0.0051680007,0.003676587,0.0029897955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15020433,0.0013685869,0.0036722578,0.01898007,0.0050412556,0.0058309953,0.0020410412,0.0048532104,0.0016994632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000905824,0.000052517342,0.0034572955,0.07831731,0.0019353486,0.00015347342,0.0010495919,0.0013326113,0.00011840926,0.051579382,0.03976639,0.8221472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034416764,0.0001272991,0.012929977,0.14245355,0.0021365697,0.00079127314,0.0012792496,0.0009447571,0.00034570516,0.061259877,0.77753496,0.0001623244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0124684395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014358387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94254124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036995169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0123749515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30387467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159515991","doi":"10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-033647","title":"The Influence of Simmel on American Sociology Since 1975","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Dualism; Symbolic interactionism; Epistemology; Interactionism; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociological research; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01531774403679251,"score_gpt":0.3581044826753326,"score_spread":0.3427867386385401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159515991","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019743733,0.7434088,0.0020076379,0.16138414,0.005434484,0.000010795452,0.000056325334,0.00003375592,0.067920305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45518762,0.48225397,0.0019847325,0.03038042,0.010950748,0.000035977442,0.00004956716,0.00005964817,0.019097347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978642,0.001196599,0.00007340085,0.00035327367,0.00039913267,0.000113439375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99373937,0.0045376406,0.00049068086,0.00017071978,0.0006755377,0.00038604793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034811604,0.0004268025,0.00046408712,0.0031480212,0.0027931915,0.0038801006,0.00040487247,0.0017395731,0.0019537804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053780163,0.00027468032,0.00018165835,0.004093408,0.0135259945,0.0048826733,0.0026299374,0.0037795352,0.00043436975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006865298,0.000020905614,0.0017425366,0.00062062475,0.000017312066,0.0002093074,0.014953863,0.00041316112,0.000232945,0.82321864,0.06310687,0.09539517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041897265,0.000020451847,0.0016532934,0.0010567427,0.000008414965,0.00020940354,0.001823842,0.00012774594,0.00019216957,0.057482883,0.9374052,0.000015665848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009353487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011715962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009353487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008351643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005165202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06059569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162007736","doi":"10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-111734","title":"New Directions in the Study of Institutional Logics: From Tools to Phenomena","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":250,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Generativity; Sociology; Epistemology; Scholarship; Corporate governance; Reification (Marxism); Centrality; Ascription; Reductionism; Institutionalism; Institutional theory; Social science; Political science; Management; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.036961517946407556,"score_gpt":0.2886387735470397,"score_spread":0.25167725560063214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162007736","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011914745,0.24880818,0.35147014,0.28899097,0.003336712,0.00014409564,0.00021933469,0.0004892549,0.09462661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49865544,0.223509,0.23159185,0.02357306,0.011761243,0.00096314563,0.0002847963,0.0006103372,0.009051087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97841734,0.016621722,0.00072397693,0.0015167663,0.0021357923,0.0005843639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8724092,0.11092752,0.0032600947,0.008779175,0.0024291305,0.002194958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03389415,0.0019168922,0.003101862,0.014362956,0.0051473216,0.028004905,0.0058298293,0.007774483,0.0072496906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023134593,0.0013386421,0.0018046836,0.013265446,0.11533992,0.080896996,0.012079956,0.017518878,0.0015301366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074321097,0.000018420313,0.00019760049,0.00025682896,0.000009916196,0.00003970638,0.002668365,0.0002935553,0.000033873002,0.9879871,0.0008334248,0.007653854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059640406,0.000009997132,0.00006858801,0.00030780258,0.0000029739956,0.000035979432,0.0021658628,0.0004974088,0.000030361498,0.9735632,0.02329922,0.000012640211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004008585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004118397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03389415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010017839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009007071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17925155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189747190","doi":"10.1146/annurev-soc-072320-095202","title":"Rethinking Culture and Cognition","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Cognition; Discipline; Sociology of culture; Epistemology; Cultural neuroscience; Cognitive science; Cultural analysis; Social science; Psychology","score_opus":0.02718115941388235,"score_gpt":0.35297614130145194,"score_spread":0.3257949818875696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189747190","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079143986,0.40179035,0.015013878,0.2964675,0.005381129,0.000027735097,0.00012825227,0.00008938606,0.20195778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8284171,0.13067952,0.0044520227,0.022540715,0.002887538,0.000070543516,0.00006765715,0.00013475881,0.0107501615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951448,0.0033135964,0.0001303443,0.0005538056,0.00050699466,0.00035038847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932341,0.0050796526,0.00033510363,0.00044541043,0.00059951877,0.0003062791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060535097,0.00084024854,0.0010089226,0.004963055,0.00371411,0.015567577,0.0015913214,0.0037307702,0.0033159098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008198344,0.00038287547,0.00050021,0.0040150364,0.041662022,0.026211286,0.00669158,0.0070043826,0.0005107009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021670987,0.000015216647,0.0013423179,0.0002660296,0.0000354674,0.00012654041,0.03886117,0.0002356476,0.00017899107,0.9224003,0.004715438,0.031801205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008108572,0.000014367216,0.0018338049,0.00068550365,0.000023012539,0.00011867298,0.023626156,0.00031502536,0.00014700515,0.86756057,0.10564165,0.000026177288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011803961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01311492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015567577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005669551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037788907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04113567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396568824","doi":"10.1146/annurev-soc-090523-042533","title":"The Rise and Fall of the Sociology of the Global City","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Global Urban Networks and Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Waseda University; York University","keywords":"Sociology; Economic geography; Economic history; History; Geography","score_opus":0.012234874359388333,"score_gpt":0.32821484688604086,"score_spread":0.3159799725266525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396568824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0774395,0.24952054,0.014495531,0.2675859,0.0038472936,0.000028471237,0.00020046358,0.00009234812,0.38678998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86352366,0.09994341,0.0021968198,0.013502501,0.0029494814,0.00005140255,0.000077938785,0.000096633055,0.017658282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799395,0.0012279092,0.00003835343,0.0003064492,0.0001991503,0.00023428231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722004,0.0017372519,0.00018564878,0.00022938538,0.00022947596,0.0003982281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019275905,0.00048970326,0.00055681495,0.0024830017,0.0038084828,0.008503753,0.00055609125,0.0034228323,0.004854666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025793677,0.0003178474,0.00040259442,0.0042763893,0.034577914,0.012955315,0.0047932444,0.004574763,0.00051682204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005309628,0.0000037131356,0.00057566364,0.00006993736,0.000004268595,0.000030743384,0.007067534,0.00022779306,0.000029107085,0.97872955,0.006851597,0.006404802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008844732,0.00001560299,0.0020742107,0.00043520526,0.0000072509997,0.000129091,0.016590346,0.00068924745,0.000052305473,0.41556025,0.564417,0.000020538473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015698109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017359657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015698109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009162637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038586687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06647986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396810814","doi":"10.1146/annurev-soc-090523-050016","title":"Rights in China: Myths, Abuses, and Politics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; China; Politics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.007840916863991245,"score_gpt":0.3219700200758046,"score_spread":0.31412910321181337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396810814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70700413,0.02202257,0.0050501456,0.09121465,0.00047451403,0.0000762959,0.00009645221,0.000050600014,0.17401068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938018,0.0025482671,0.00027738156,0.0010635393,0.000094505456,0.00002669625,0.000014399968,0.0000044521425,0.002168984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962388,0.0015541154,0.00021600958,0.00043365028,0.00086408196,0.00069321704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803025,0.0009002866,0.0003625329,0.00026046755,0.00019534517,0.0002511494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065131094,0.00039143173,0.000436879,0.003096463,0.007853025,0.005975623,0.0010894072,0.0019678597,0.0019628054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042128004,0.0002526206,0.0003366967,0.0032134585,0.05199376,0.008701639,0.0064997785,0.002647962,0.00008585701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000113165615,0.000015542431,0.008630234,0.000111156485,0.000011394663,0.00031373513,0.06344875,0.00041501084,0.00033271042,0.900841,0.0015361503,0.024333017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021533302,0.00009199961,0.038111933,0.0008654033,0.00003927687,0.0005405715,0.093867354,0.002318025,0.0007824518,0.7138088,0.1494516,0.00010109877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026434986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016834375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026434986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010798816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00823542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07835126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408016998","doi":"10.1146/annurev-soc-083024-064121","title":"An Invisibility/Hypervisibility Paradox: The Sociology of Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) Americans","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Sociology","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Invisibility; Middle East; Sociology; Gender studies; Anthropology; Ancient history; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04978487431372628,"score_gpt":0.35484060566257897,"score_spread":0.30505573134885267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408016998","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2174706,0.42613828,0.008305287,0.3008919,0.0020106244,0.000033801956,0.000051210616,0.00004307241,0.045055173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8426169,0.12808546,0.0027004653,0.02205444,0.0021303562,0.00006496599,0.000030942134,0.000028486238,0.0022878894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900276,0.007949436,0.00023838201,0.0004727023,0.0010350083,0.00027674323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820514,0.014721774,0.0012016449,0.00056189514,0.0009371611,0.000526186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01958259,0.00021763364,0.0004820891,0.0032119395,0.004466586,0.006301909,0.0008114753,0.0016819672,0.00072703604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014450079,0.00021689576,0.00022610364,0.0025589361,0.029330105,0.00934066,0.0041861837,0.0032897273,0.00009783316],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042426545,0.000049981627,0.012657763,0.00083540997,0.000059294744,0.00062175334,0.18162479,0.00016749583,0.0007735621,0.66994673,0.010459743,0.122761056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021266538,0.000079767895,0.01900246,0.0034478863,0.00006054161,0.0009107616,0.17391835,0.00033773758,0.00050322246,0.48946342,0.31218493,0.000069813206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060775103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010116416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01958259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003537498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005418978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103563845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}