{"meta":{"query_hash":"69d5a7d6300c","filters":{"venue":"Anthropology Today"},"cohort_total":34,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":34,"exported":34,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/69d5a7d6300c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Anthropology+Today"},"results":[{"id":"W1491310687","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.12098","title":"The world's most powerful number: An assessment of 80 years of GDP ideology (Respond to this article at http://www.therai.org.uk/at/debate)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Gross domestic product; Ideology; Corporate governance; Product (mathematics); Economic governance; Real gross domestic product; History; Political science; Economics; Law; Macroeconomics; Politics; Management; Mathematics","score_opus":0.016561012241462076,"score_gpt":0.3128114233991106,"score_spread":0.29625041115764855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491310687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3044562,0.05241969,0.0017283428,0.13324615,0.0041094148,0.000035273257,0.004006937,0.000040905798,0.4999572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611146,0.013671444,0.000719347,0.0052428995,0.0013297689,0.00006293375,0.0012072994,0.00007492094,0.016576711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983133,0.00039633142,0.0001035803,0.00012329333,0.00076123606,0.00030236595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703395,0.0011028036,0.0006732831,0.00015202747,0.00060441217,0.00043352813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036599422,0.00028111113,0.00031231972,0.003538041,0.0015151701,0.0034151038,0.00056432124,0.0011402202,0.008124739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010582125,0.00014622771,0.00033200582,0.004718712,0.0032626574,0.0048892577,0.0027213877,0.0019024261,0.0015892597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057054794,0.000051608087,0.05829365,0.0006153306,0.00011728926,0.0004267619,0.04115484,0.0004890468,0.00047812233,0.38510653,0.23552428,0.27717194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001959991,0.00012934423,0.22037126,0.001410625,0.000043494998,0.00037451918,0.03790286,0.00031220203,0.00038542616,0.040327583,0.6986509,0.000072170325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004731849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007524969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008124739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002604218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087113737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027179956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991656552","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8322.2012.00862.x","title":"Indochine chic: Why is Vietnamese food so classy in Singapore? (Respond to this article at http://www.therai.org.uk/at/debate)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in Asia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vietnamese; Multiculturalism; Ethnic group; Commodity; Underwriting; Immigration; Beijing; Media studies; Advertising; Sociology; Political science; Business; Law; China","score_opus":0.02753200120992157,"score_gpt":0.3331776401886448,"score_spread":0.30564563897872327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991656552","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11875069,0.009413892,0.00024437075,0.7558251,0.0042566233,0.000023620567,0.0001743354,0.000021013575,0.11129038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73118484,0.009946985,0.00020586487,0.1649741,0.0019477323,0.000051043262,0.00010148455,0.0000729189,0.09151501],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914837,0.000415063,0.0000361355,0.0001221679,0.00011790404,0.00016033724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986431,0.0006156226,0.00019804723,0.000057525147,0.0001831,0.00030261383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018129229,0.00017578511,0.0002451616,0.00020777313,0.006556241,0.0042425175,0.0005728124,0.0047963643,0.01172334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020580483,0.00018768411,0.00021078657,0.0006580831,0.0054820194,0.0034759706,0.0022447756,0.004061827,0.0011479842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014816654,0.00006969395,0.022263434,0.0007788723,0.000052159747,0.0070297774,0.4127121,0.00008554438,0.0022971847,0.11107793,0.38834673,0.05513838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076189544,0.000036866633,0.012596401,0.00030109665,0.000010243422,0.00073104416,0.2813739,0.00003673734,0.0003584758,0.0023834012,0.7021332,0.00003108283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037243806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062512875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037243806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032153637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019230968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07405406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030168039","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8322.2009.00698.x","title":"Negotiating new visions: An interview with Anthony Shelton by Gustaaf Houtman","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Exhibition; Museology; Vision; Indigenous; General partnership; Negotiation; Sociology; Ethnography; Media studies; Anthropology; Visual arts; Social science; Art history; History; Art; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03324678440769968,"score_gpt":0.2823630893587731,"score_spread":0.2491163049510734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030168039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47257,0.019002564,0.0048423703,0.40157425,0.0042614057,0.0005978286,0.00020708259,0.00009887035,0.096845634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82935655,0.008405799,0.004531234,0.09444129,0.0005817656,0.00074772135,0.00009863749,0.00022927715,0.061607838],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872917,0.009071338,0.0002151999,0.0006122164,0.001556811,0.0012526681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860714,0.009343831,0.00065139506,0.00020278069,0.0011718527,0.0025588463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009997496,0.0009100656,0.0011314594,0.0017129243,0.02907484,0.009335687,0.002536087,0.0097028995,0.006016674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023716146,0.0015015362,0.00053474994,0.0017636704,0.0189932,0.01361981,0.008346589,0.022881187,0.00076931494],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020984644,0.000045989764,0.00029019974,0.00004989857,0.0000032403957,0.0013556745,0.9645649,0.00003736624,0.00038855447,0.006194492,0.023679158,0.003369506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004127766,0.00002644085,0.0003164258,0.00023379733,0.000002291404,0.00048879976,0.88848037,0.00007403224,0.00010393649,0.00090989645,0.10933555,0.000024255854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050380666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0698312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050380666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008088353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0080478685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100174844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031526679","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8322.2010.00710.x","title":"Ethical dilemmas? UK immigration, Legal Aid funding reform and caseworkers (Respond to this article at http://www.therai.org.uk/at/debate)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Development Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Obligation; Adversarial system; Sympathy; Conversation; Context (archaeology); Law; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.017404891084000222,"score_gpt":0.33332718127822053,"score_spread":0.3159222901942203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031526679","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019056782,0.029379731,0.00029833082,0.9092246,0.0025201282,0.000015519967,0.000019323754,0.0000094945235,0.039476044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7176575,0.023390526,0.00083281915,0.23777588,0.0029476301,0.00013050786,0.00002920969,0.000045317844,0.017190706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9521517,0.037646413,0.0012324407,0.0015356721,0.0028336297,0.004600051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95446056,0.03494284,0.0035522874,0.00088209327,0.0018543671,0.004307727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041149165,0.0004632779,0.0007479674,0.0020356644,0.017278228,0.02227208,0.0025696799,0.023318082,0.011272922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053338237,0.00048365656,0.0004988389,0.0027968239,0.051905602,0.01939313,0.011756411,0.011486314,0.0011575927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073939074,0.00008438899,0.0020837106,0.00056178396,0.000021298594,0.0015903367,0.21500829,0.00013843918,0.00014309016,0.6013155,0.12872468,0.050254554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003709704,0.00004450643,0.0030302308,0.0028155248,0.000015233397,0.00097069575,0.39488754,0.000114314455,0.00011370384,0.11713537,0.48076698,0.00006875997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0373018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048465703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041149165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020745685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017982025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2176202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051321412","doi":"10.1111/j.0268-540x.2005.00344.x","title":"FACE TO FACE: Connecting proximity and Distance","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.03131473687779966,"score_gpt":0.32710324358896337,"score_spread":0.2957885067111637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051321412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105932444,0.05164033,0.09253663,0.17636314,0.0037109435,0.0001135522,0.00047057643,0.00022216409,0.5690103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496486,0.012613355,0.019734947,0.0048082583,0.0009136204,0.00014883354,0.00020884986,0.00017981674,0.011743778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671894,0.0024448344,0.0000814015,0.00030207197,0.00024591186,0.00020685353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99509287,0.003501851,0.00038202794,0.0002398108,0.00046991336,0.00031357657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022486108,0.00048800805,0.00044681787,0.002779632,0.0042539285,0.008413738,0.0013800656,0.003566528,0.0154695865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015221994,0.0003994937,0.00036501262,0.004559179,0.012447942,0.021273235,0.0058777523,0.0025539862,0.0012581012],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007193835,0.000028534057,0.0047532734,0.00034492393,0.000022106302,0.00036627922,0.10856024,0.0004463601,0.00017714199,0.73872244,0.044233005,0.102273695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023898929,0.000046900797,0.008183655,0.0008645026,0.000057019646,0.0009972048,0.13638337,0.0016621761,0.00033649695,0.52396333,0.3274007,0.00008075033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009970684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011957216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0154695865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001679494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013549576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0517509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057682266","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8322.2008.00584.x","title":"Destination enlightenment: Branding Buddhism and spiritual tourism in Bodhgaya, Bihar","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Religious Tourism and Spaces","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Wood Council; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Gautama Buddha; Enlightenment; Buddhism; Tourism; World heritage; Sociology; Political science; Law; History; Philosophy; Theology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.020796040112543043,"score_gpt":0.30885467827271457,"score_spread":0.2880586381601715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057682266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9748439,0.00079791213,0.00013830067,0.0017349498,0.000025220916,0.000007980832,0.000013399149,0.0000033744022,0.022434955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971716,0.00030249954,0.00006736738,0.00009857617,0.0000049491705,0.000003513335,0.000007995852,0.0000017729551,0.0023418318],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970657,0.00013952913,0.0000054033762,0.000020905762,0.00003156799,0.00009608739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997981,0.00006833014,0.000040352825,0.000007311257,0.000016891488,0.000068970694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004948777,0.00015736783,0.00015373938,0.00068627315,0.007819743,0.004248321,0.0004745649,0.0008791835,0.0039135166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041186519,0.00021082917,0.00009517783,0.0011110144,0.0047666435,0.0017550337,0.0025366563,0.0012582383,0.00023967361],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012524627,0.00029638538,0.05374432,0.00024134413,0.000016743563,0.0042202603,0.8299792,0.00012674849,0.0025772557,0.06683624,0.003351195,0.03848516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011168856,0.00010679216,0.07709845,0.000092704184,0.000009767315,0.0010213563,0.8617092,0.00013184732,0.00034203875,0.0034699577,0.055987384,0.000019367006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018814517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06715606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018814517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030603586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018893724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03740996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068045658","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8322.2009.00700.x","title":"Anthropology, liberalism and female genital cutting","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Ethnography; Female circumcision; Liberalism; Sociology; Gender studies; Work (physics); Anthropology; Law; Political science; Politics; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021178021371438736,"score_gpt":0.32993064419914847,"score_spread":0.3087526228277097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068045658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15446223,0.064869106,0.0051745535,0.28597435,0.0015458656,0.00003323298,0.00001695527,0.000030632975,0.48789313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712496,0.0065447707,0.00089979783,0.009561614,0.00074877363,0.000038166134,0.0000044964027,0.000014594864,0.0109382495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950865,0.0038523588,0.00007527045,0.00019780143,0.00036363458,0.00042447195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952361,0.0038448465,0.000415637,0.0001816842,0.00011028135,0.00021144265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061967685,0.00038043194,0.0003305968,0.0014324985,0.012686105,0.00547757,0.00065202994,0.0029005473,0.0025768199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047755647,0.00023809294,0.0001591216,0.0009647925,0.081364065,0.0037135545,0.0067027044,0.0050239568,0.00014895803],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007520452,0.000019676612,0.00057230267,0.000058917092,0.0000022106967,0.00015387667,0.083694614,0.000048607555,0.00009972311,0.9045875,0.0023148346,0.008440209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001573638,0.0000444554,0.0018946829,0.00070378085,0.00000611612,0.0006206158,0.14935055,0.00011947547,0.00035300973,0.5027332,0.3441422,0.000016121145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024294679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003629247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012686105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031796289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026249255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032772005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077675675","doi":"10.1111/j.0268-540x.2005.00324.x","title":"Muslim village intellectuals: The life of the mind in northern Pakistan","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Frontier; Urdu; Colonialism; Sociology; Gender studies; Period (music); History; Ancient history; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02485235337503554,"score_gpt":0.33317191206229096,"score_spread":0.3083195586872554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077675675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9331194,0.004726706,0.00014689071,0.007771916,0.0002137107,0.00003327964,0.000057284662,0.000013044495,0.053917732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99648076,0.0009903936,0.000043256976,0.00045681786,0.000030206935,0.000011228501,0.000008139317,0.0000031878558,0.0019761068],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863106,0.00070839777,0.000026005368,0.000096257456,0.00012864245,0.0004095976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861944,0.00048099304,0.00023987428,0.00007652022,0.000098617485,0.00048454967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014932574,0.00044979306,0.00044190683,0.0010302421,0.027144905,0.006742946,0.00075145456,0.001401158,0.0040884404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00193786,0.00042478417,0.00013149717,0.0015798347,0.023818769,0.0041706264,0.0050899303,0.0028776051,0.00034458586],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002293294,0.000024598128,0.0037681232,0.000040054045,0.0000038808294,0.0009745227,0.9850802,0.000015884729,0.0001357866,0.004968542,0.0012615819,0.0037038976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053220215,0.000030947405,0.0062120506,0.00006706586,0.0000027492333,0.00039145484,0.97977614,0.000015081655,0.00003078354,0.00083389477,0.01262556,0.000008905384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038791157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062899284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038791157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005034692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004591176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077130735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079964972","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8322.2009.00643.x","title":"Post‐communist ironies in an East German hotel","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"German History and Society","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Irony; Joke; German; Resistance (ecology); Unification; Czech; Communism; History; Literature; Aesthetics; East-Central Europe; Sociology; Art; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics; Linguistics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02801447689258845,"score_gpt":0.28925540434076935,"score_spread":0.2612409274481809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079964972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9043096,0.0017097078,0.0001969787,0.005484846,0.00023976866,0.0000092319015,0.000042742467,0.000018744167,0.08798843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889893,0.00014766098,0.000025985233,0.0002468636,0.000017259752,0.00000223145,0.000008902022,0.000009201506,0.0105527295],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901855,0.00036371793,0.000017871092,0.00006733625,0.00009167674,0.0004408174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997323,0.00008659067,0.000051902232,0.000024848778,0.000026900676,0.00007736847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011634108,0.00036318076,0.00022046042,0.00085862406,0.014284753,0.004148747,0.00040701343,0.0011787742,0.0039840234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009742745,0.0002706902,0.000133906,0.0007133268,0.01297587,0.002279016,0.004467245,0.0018490482,0.0003676153],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020643743,0.000070669565,0.00434839,0.000088831424,0.000016891092,0.0043688156,0.79609764,0.00024658057,0.000850205,0.15836081,0.021213148,0.014131621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031453805,0.00007551321,0.017634593,0.00019045496,0.00001318529,0.00093168655,0.6478249,0.00019339645,0.00084237027,0.005270137,0.3269572,0.000035174326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021882664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0792698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021882664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054728496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011477722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043510556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080097729","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8322.2008.00611.x","title":"De‐medicalizing anorexia: A new cultural brokering","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dualism; Context (archaeology); Beauty; Medicalization; Tragedy (event); Mind–body problem; Aesthetics; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Consciousness; Psychology; Epistemology; Art; Social science; History; Philosophy; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.04104217607350803,"score_gpt":0.35897480253256936,"score_spread":0.31793262645906134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080097729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95060605,0.0015492633,0.0032986128,0.017946031,0.00016111718,0.00008842033,0.000030297018,0.00002058254,0.026299601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624556,0.0004045814,0.00054691645,0.0013432701,0.000014552286,0.000025060765,0.0000072173,0.000012111212,0.0014006748],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98775846,0.009890101,0.00028469323,0.00044285058,0.0006352944,0.0009885853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929878,0.004212911,0.0010395753,0.00025739096,0.00064812147,0.00085430726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009653453,0.00044490382,0.00047444616,0.0015746482,0.01628289,0.007248651,0.0014954703,0.0019120486,0.0023970457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00936376,0.00058646174,0.0001925311,0.0012699964,0.036939833,0.0049435017,0.0099157905,0.0054488797,0.000100373836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006123413,0.000006830607,0.00094754,0.00001806662,0.0000016214015,0.0002536503,0.9922184,0.000009250576,0.00027332682,0.004847358,0.0002739592,0.0011439426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016401094,0.00000692143,0.00083598134,0.00004568658,0.0000022884042,0.00016317613,0.9906426,0.000028076767,0.000081395825,0.0006263253,0.007559877,0.0000059496215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06542242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12808451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06542242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009329459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011134135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1300832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085249994","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8322.2008.00602.x","title":"Ethnic micropolitics in Eastern Europe: A case study from Slovakia's Gypsy archipelago","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Romani and Gypsy Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; De facto; Ethnic group; Archipelago; Political science; Ethnology; Geography; Development economics; Sociology; Law; Archaeology; Economics","score_opus":0.15879600951772913,"score_gpt":0.46727012235082865,"score_spread":0.30847411283309956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085249994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997894,0.00024668637,0.000037503298,0.00007834717,0.0000035694018,0.000008153839,0.000019386054,8.70019e-7,0.0017115835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979255,0.00056339457,0.00008070832,0.000075337986,0.0000036230165,0.000010029395,0.000025778663,0.0000035271212,0.0013122098],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991817,0.00034031784,0.00004715318,0.00007737277,0.00006208788,0.00029136593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996288,0.00010674868,0.00009617744,0.000030108728,0.000035891004,0.000102304235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007145781,0.00046804358,0.00058214465,0.0015950562,0.009147459,0.0020547817,0.00086415524,0.0012415692,0.002009029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007835795,0.00035492968,0.00035440357,0.0019604743,0.0035800168,0.0006608026,0.0033609439,0.000878771,0.0002564332],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001815129,0.00044682523,0.24877395,0.00033717236,0.00011261625,0.087502874,0.63550395,0.00038092028,0.0019391516,0.005093616,0.0015625843,0.01816486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001326937,0.00014984314,0.2639612,0.00023362068,0.00005951135,0.013600267,0.7097293,0.000121964826,0.00037853717,0.00022016588,0.011509433,0.000022928052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06043075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20216092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06043075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033894354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019769592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12015802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085508879","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8322.2007.00498.x","title":"SCIENCE, EVOLUTION AND CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY <i>A response to Ingold (this issue)</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Language and cultural evolution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Anthropology; Sociology; Art history; Library science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.013331008700013667,"score_gpt":0.35890331937073267,"score_spread":0.345572310670719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085508879","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016079273,0.0032466871,0.00014583419,0.919032,0.076511286,0.000008332279,0.000028819395,0.000027370774,0.00083879865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001961753,0.001912887,0.00037437744,0.9012531,0.08847515,0.000035270423,0.000029668823,0.00007430867,0.0058834576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99167424,0.002126839,0.00094969745,0.0014889424,0.0026045819,0.0011556649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.946553,0.035675984,0.002901872,0.0021257626,0.007759564,0.004983944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013366142,0.0022000566,0.0041854247,0.0021453695,0.013641845,0.014601977,0.006338753,0.05360478,0.009546315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034085706,0.0016827222,0.002659807,0.0031032541,0.01824357,0.015282504,0.010631927,0.08131774,0.0049764602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019067871,0.00001453421,0.00013312492,0.000088387664,0.000011109397,0.00009707329,0.0004579153,0.00002442104,0.000086534215,0.004340974,0.99184364,0.002883128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003135332,0.000027265889,0.0010001035,0.0005347607,0.000038964987,0.00036193934,0.0035977745,0.0001663698,0.0003456694,0.013601156,0.980206,0.000088634486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013013733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02913636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05360478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053146295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008639603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07068777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130963728","doi":"10.1111/j.0268-540x.2005.00327.x","title":"PALAEOANTHROPOLOGY AND LOCAL LEGENDS
 <i>Homo floresiensis</i> in the news","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Paleoanthropology; Citation; History; Library science; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01937550766273821,"score_gpt":0.31992122887157215,"score_spread":0.30054572120883394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130963728","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014085828,0.067568034,0.00047981358,0.6037786,0.258616,0.000024477795,0.002653363,0.00024694082,0.052546866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.102109805,0.063608065,0.001064439,0.18970166,0.20286696,0.00007675978,0.0028164655,0.00050935947,0.43724653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99980074,0.000037526574,0.000021591211,0.000035974972,0.000056769397,0.000047526468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910384,0.00032992172,0.00011825947,0.000082902174,0.00018457191,0.00018046127],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083559455,0.0005122601,0.00043820366,0.0009849314,0.0024307845,0.0031637135,0.0007286488,0.0030899667,0.019662328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016489681,0.00042458478,0.0002715305,0.0013668577,0.0016947597,0.0020603116,0.0013165232,0.006078605,0.0033407074],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009853316,0.000018811677,0.001292358,0.00019257593,0.000017634191,0.00037220813,0.0016756844,0.000019409788,0.00035392682,0.0029366494,0.9697772,0.023245014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071382137,0.000007091518,0.0046088765,0.00014407746,0.000011502133,0.00010849277,0.0014553827,0.000010238689,0.00017280922,0.0002661707,0.99319893,0.000009300101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040739607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16924046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018878919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008058421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08100492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145719326","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.00013","title":"Nuriaty, the Saint and the Sultan: Virtuous subject and subjective virtuoso of the Post‐modern Colony","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); SAINT; Citation; Sociology; History; Art history; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.00960144681984201,"score_gpt":0.2794135438876419,"score_spread":0.2698120970677999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145719326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89412725,0.0021391152,0.000283053,0.0053284992,0.00008265933,0.0000086076425,0.000011499924,0.000010004656,0.0980093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977302,0.00018374529,0.00004316178,0.000079658625,0.000008663415,0.0000015436706,0.000001924681,0.0000028143809,0.0019483042],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970204,0.00016413248,0.000009190965,0.00002079392,0.000031355747,0.000072430485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974924,0.00007575849,0.000041708423,0.000033277855,0.00003287394,0.00006709015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097391347,0.00019338145,0.00017290247,0.0005280753,0.007467405,0.00406213,0.00042552484,0.00057931844,0.0017416102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097324327,0.0001343954,0.0000714325,0.0006403856,0.020273417,0.0017380939,0.0023694918,0.001442708,0.00008799116],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004538409,0.000027766719,0.0055159875,0.000032273667,0.0000062618606,0.00049816567,0.75120026,0.0000436574,0.00058453274,0.22986284,0.0015394528,0.010643443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015603242,0.000064894644,0.029625041,0.00009671052,0.000018704419,0.00077383296,0.78140503,0.00021284666,0.00051805394,0.051885176,0.13535619,0.000027922362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017513823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056450237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017513823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002045868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020333515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034823716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2411868835","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.12253","title":"The <i>longue durée</i> of the Human Terrain: Politics, cultural knowledge and the technical fix","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Politics; Corporate governance; Terrain; Field (mathematics); Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Anthropology; Law; Geography; Management; Philosophy; Cartography","score_opus":0.01738852421503574,"score_gpt":0.3394395854218198,"score_spread":0.32205106120678406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2411868835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06591189,0.022247506,0.017032152,0.151753,0.0013491426,0.000043748587,0.00010579191,0.00010880609,0.74144787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705964,0.005033889,0.0020968488,0.003765103,0.00047526296,0.00005514922,0.000023867397,0.000059970425,0.017893473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952413,0.0029728354,0.00014607585,0.0003953178,0.0005508446,0.00069367763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99371606,0.0033164623,0.00064466306,0.0014241784,0.00045373695,0.0004449378],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007568032,0.0003104909,0.00030967733,0.0018056589,0.008968773,0.017532278,0.00096947985,0.0027081345,0.0051031923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008164848,0.0004084732,0.00026788886,0.0021825265,0.089831024,0.011940287,0.0051849075,0.0055101677,0.0004561587],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069532043,0.0000055460896,0.0004510051,0.000021686317,0.0000031156528,0.00005957834,0.010104873,0.00007633657,0.00008059765,0.9812866,0.001977822,0.005926005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011233069,0.000039982006,0.0038096055,0.00053677673,0.000009195134,0.00029500868,0.035862997,0.00018882823,0.00040543042,0.58772504,0.3710714,0.000044356653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011213975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011155659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008717596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056792283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0632509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507092258","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8322.2011.00808.x","title":"Enter the myopticon: Uncertain surveillance in the Danish asylum system (Respond to this article at http://www.therai.org.uk/at/debate)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Intertek (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Danish; Political science; Media studies; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036896909477247865,"score_gpt":0.32548378583018256,"score_spread":0.2885868763529347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507092258","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14348918,0.03439228,0.0027730195,0.59346604,0.0033751717,0.0000347661,0.000104921775,0.000022332873,0.2223423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95325917,0.004827768,0.0004180012,0.030388623,0.00029395477,0.000017061499,0.000013823479,0.00002038097,0.010761215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98823184,0.007254051,0.00052616466,0.00077174016,0.0015754389,0.0016407552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99328,0.0047628824,0.00069853215,0.0002333087,0.00037241317,0.00065297465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011158742,0.00023330197,0.00035104834,0.0009345414,0.018398818,0.01315439,0.0014007757,0.011015498,0.0037724571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011007915,0.0004432736,0.0003700825,0.0008772342,0.036419846,0.007722662,0.008143009,0.008480751,0.0004789782],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058655063,0.000017550885,0.0016408254,0.00020594943,0.000014493262,0.0008589423,0.2629084,0.00017651288,0.00026163377,0.6973878,0.026297549,0.010171739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016133694,0.00003624667,0.005229613,0.0007620087,0.000019676589,0.0007863107,0.4265893,0.00020371913,0.00036291068,0.05194595,0.5139434,0.00010480463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06766765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06589855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06766765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014254282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074386876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13454759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584314911","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.12322","title":"What's (written) history for?: On James C. Scott's <i>Zomia</i> , especially Chapter 6½","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Orality; Egalitarianism; Argument (complex analysis); Reading (process); Literacy; History; Sociology; Literature; Flexibility (engineering); State (computer science); Oral tradition; Aesthetics; Anthropology; Classics; Philosophy; Law; Art; Linguistics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05811149192663946,"score_gpt":0.36363947637386623,"score_spread":0.3055279844472268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584314911","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027716635,0.13035204,0.0027539849,0.51742744,0.020817481,0.000052966847,0.00012377895,0.00010707284,0.30064857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6290934,0.07582066,0.0018721689,0.10479878,0.01268821,0.00010540465,0.00013908837,0.00023680396,0.17524555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994098,0.00031289342,0.000016113401,0.000057977522,0.00012335012,0.00007994819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907243,0.00048256814,0.000098200275,0.000043108867,0.00019859792,0.000104922176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013341754,0.00024406705,0.00021887933,0.0007337204,0.0046996814,0.0058163214,0.00048670705,0.001442609,0.00503027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025443472,0.00013935236,0.00013675622,0.00081000634,0.00879976,0.0065207165,0.0019128169,0.002913555,0.0006715437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033472537,0.000029480198,0.000954762,0.0003640869,0.000007689394,0.00037231087,0.08029737,0.00007409435,0.000508836,0.4789502,0.3682649,0.07014273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028877332,0.000014581014,0.0014887698,0.0006934114,0.0000036428696,0.00015325657,0.018421112,0.000041153202,0.00019427676,0.016453812,0.96252066,0.000012433622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011606603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021943096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011606603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021985404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020818035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023078084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761468705","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.12380","title":"The price of austerity: Vital politics and the struggle for public water in southern Italy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Austerity; Financialization; Politics; Political economy; Obedience; Opposition (politics); Economics; Public good; Political science; Market economy; Law; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.03446941502722128,"score_gpt":0.26253719309360646,"score_spread":0.22806777806638517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761468705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7546497,0.0021785994,0.0011010501,0.057626784,0.00009318375,0.000012142696,0.000028042066,0.000022476097,0.18428805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965244,0.00021627785,0.000049541137,0.0005171342,0.000045529185,0.0000033963909,0.0000049565683,0.000004721515,0.0026340913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902415,0.0005041335,0.000010400284,0.000068803434,0.00009178108,0.0003007808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937457,0.00026582464,0.00016422507,0.000035094123,0.00003909648,0.00012132965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016695879,0.0001257678,0.00019465957,0.00068104843,0.0041526947,0.0042013023,0.0003848653,0.0017549811,0.0036373914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020751404,0.00015971033,0.00014947566,0.00081379566,0.016535318,0.0025329383,0.003195237,0.0019482782,0.00022496095],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011877949,0.000060041268,0.024330253,0.00012205251,0.00001554827,0.0012898588,0.15893316,0.0006809425,0.0010187036,0.77613133,0.014244889,0.023054445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048588096,0.0001140651,0.19439119,0.00043325906,0.000023125447,0.0006418246,0.22534609,0.0017213717,0.0005570568,0.20290631,0.37372184,0.00009530368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020973103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042340897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020973103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007053963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014898359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051180303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806669270","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.12437","title":"On expectations in the aftermath of the ‘refugee crisis’: Ethnographic prospects from a post‐industrial German city","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Future Earth","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Ethnography; German; nobody; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Politics; Refugee crisis; Political science; Political economy; Gender studies; Law; History; Anthropology","score_opus":0.030319795524822734,"score_gpt":0.35350791309268564,"score_spread":0.3231881175678629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806669270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99483526,0.00034020146,0.00017295154,0.0012718213,0.000025503809,0.000032589545,0.000047151145,0.0000051942066,0.003269393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966851,0.0006739323,0.00013992477,0.00047735142,0.000018598721,0.00007039651,0.00004925706,0.000017591057,0.0018679183],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99394196,0.0043750503,0.00015544875,0.0002904855,0.00027902942,0.000957994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936987,0.0042941943,0.00065466436,0.00023349657,0.00036755842,0.000751223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071491664,0.00093118823,0.0007101619,0.003049464,0.018338773,0.010654386,0.0022460353,0.0028993257,0.0032151146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00904683,0.0011788758,0.0003852972,0.0036848637,0.02227572,0.008096782,0.008626372,0.00571502,0.00050100975],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000883279,0.000013865059,0.0009664415,0.000012225572,0.0000011143571,0.00031373653,0.99761546,0.0000107349415,0.00009162738,0.00042518988,0.00014929663,0.0003915397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.687624e-7,0.0000073917795,0.00054815994,0.000015068851,7.3277783e-7,0.000058283855,0.99825984,0.000007728809,0.0000309334,0.000039227747,0.0010286388,0.0000033926178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04595664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09417876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04595664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005752027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003011639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09137827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903472062","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.12470","title":"What DNA can't tell: Problems with using genetic tests to determine the nationality of migrants","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Race, Genetics, and Society","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nationality; Scope (computer science); Agency (philosophy); Politics; Law; Sociology; Political science; Order (exchange); Work (physics); Immigration; Social science; Business; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.021276869741072683,"score_gpt":0.30001753062810577,"score_spread":0.2787406608870331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903472062","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027700407,0.010910667,0.019900413,0.92137337,0.0025435525,0.00006902675,0.00010872862,0.000100240235,0.017293612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54893047,0.018119792,0.03229186,0.38992572,0.0024291724,0.00019811884,0.00010852032,0.00033241973,0.007663905],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8595933,0.09795101,0.007924232,0.005035536,0.025860453,0.0036355797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64065915,0.31227112,0.0110706985,0.009448978,0.023050424,0.0034995577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17143042,0.0004288533,0.000876595,0.00273238,0.010376345,0.010828149,0.004451172,0.009597429,0.0014381539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3206021,0.000866921,0.000554745,0.0024616823,0.05106007,0.010905243,0.0053491616,0.012024865,0.0007499994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018293693,0.000085235704,0.028861286,0.00072824484,0.00008713078,0.0021695478,0.3656104,0.0006491735,0.0014209867,0.22585313,0.07537714,0.2989748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055730205,0.00018650848,0.012831647,0.005402683,0.00012653551,0.005836929,0.3306044,0.0016147208,0.0042790635,0.25519535,0.3834302,0.0004361988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16016026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1555575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17143042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011093473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027227078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9066216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911607137","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.12483","title":"‘Third‐class’ Slovak Roma and inclusion: <i>Bricoleurs</i> vs social engineers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Romani and Gypsy Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Slovak; Inclusion (mineral); Autonomy; Ethnography; Sociology; Politics; Class (philosophy); Gender studies; Political science; Social integration; Law; Anthropology; Epistemology; Czech","score_opus":0.02162900808338866,"score_gpt":0.3678711302524576,"score_spread":0.34624212216906897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911607137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9023544,0.0027624457,0.0001775226,0.0036781623,0.0000625985,0.000011035002,0.000011734997,0.0000047890157,0.090937324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945322,0.0005240998,0.000036479167,0.0002384987,0.000014881369,0.000004721288,0.0000057202496,0.0000034398222,0.0046398435],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988373,0.000505862,0.000030495918,0.000097676595,0.00009078155,0.00043802758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995952,0.00015471994,0.00009482731,0.000032887467,0.000024942421,0.00009745081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013140893,0.0002466365,0.0003150471,0.0010422926,0.0069886595,0.004714584,0.00039320881,0.00088548934,0.003655905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088961713,0.00017044075,0.00015607639,0.00090420165,0.015390114,0.0018750171,0.0064415955,0.001141072,0.0003450969],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089334244,0.00006816306,0.023442144,0.00018935159,0.000014782588,0.0010931675,0.8380916,0.000054673284,0.000871979,0.1017039,0.002416912,0.031964015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012146643,0.00008623842,0.0929175,0.000492257,0.000017432563,0.0006944598,0.7825411,0.00006897725,0.00039323664,0.003986742,0.1187697,0.00002022884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024138147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046350904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024138147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029497868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002591826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04799533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977371015","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.12528","title":"The unbearable weight of music: The intermezzo","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Musicology and Musical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Torture; Musical; Aesthetics; Realm; Communitas; Liminality; Mode (computer interface); Sociology; Art; Literature; History; Law; Human rights; Political science","score_opus":0.017175126584160424,"score_gpt":0.23904150078778078,"score_spread":0.22186637420362035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977371015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.233101,0.013331967,0.009839746,0.017337032,0.0010260792,0.000024134568,0.000036917703,0.00009015493,0.72521305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98000264,0.0018124896,0.0006574248,0.00046724954,0.0002447735,0.000011206692,0.000009094134,0.000033596087,0.016761508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999178,0.00041825257,0.000013725134,0.00009849881,0.0001940266,0.00009747398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993818,0.00030620504,0.000071016955,0.000105232284,0.000061035884,0.00007481367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008652345,0.00034027474,0.0002955136,0.0012383052,0.0044218386,0.0078643635,0.0006326009,0.0013739963,0.0038793248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020676325,0.00015533819,0.00017550694,0.0006981176,0.021906637,0.0035415036,0.004914163,0.0020699163,0.0003646417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096853255,0.000026626596,0.001906141,0.000116641975,0.000011097669,0.00032042197,0.15771244,0.000110481706,0.0014065127,0.783491,0.0044356743,0.050366156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002877056,0.000096203425,0.013789457,0.0006626098,0.000041264426,0.0011227778,0.20607571,0.00066544145,0.001125921,0.186592,0.58976084,0.000039034185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003224286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071476023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078643635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016104907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083440344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01297766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187864426","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.12666","title":"Fuelling toxic relations: Oil sands and settler colonialism in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Ethnography; Colonialism; Industrial pollution; Product (mathematics); Oil spill; Oil pollution; Sociology; Ethnology; Environmental ethics; Pollution; Political science; Environmental protection; Geography; Anthropology; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.007046201632044047,"score_gpt":0.21247390711369932,"score_spread":0.20542770548165526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187864426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841738,0.00074347545,0.000061021772,0.002110331,0.00001836203,0.00001206538,0.000038614115,0.000002908891,0.012839386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965407,0.00066585763,0.00005911508,0.00022326483,0.0000032224204,0.0000032367298,0.000019550049,0.0000030897731,0.0024818836],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853575,0.0002020347,0.000031567575,0.00012351123,0.0003060024,0.0008010961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865687,0.00026601908,0.00022192666,0.00004468169,0.00036992523,0.000440641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010059471,0.00019137819,0.0003963862,0.0011865812,0.019117929,0.0046461946,0.0012551217,0.0008861594,0.0026339365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024872357,0.00027858553,0.00016163762,0.0024167094,0.010957257,0.00094926637,0.0038264734,0.0018396633,0.000082257175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010352812,0.00010483552,0.16611302,0.00012579723,0.000041684703,0.0025585913,0.77382386,0.00027545277,0.0013553185,0.015768869,0.0033118478,0.036417235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008418445,0.000027289296,0.16176887,0.0001589849,0.000024760395,0.00028730632,0.8003823,0.00015408154,0.00025132607,0.0006826599,0.036217157,0.00003677478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99401146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054366603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054366603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06245076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3944592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210638994","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8322.2012.00902.x","title":"Engaged anthropology: Comment on Mahmoud AT 28(4) (Respond to this article at http://www.therai.org.uk/at/debate)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03854952551915329,"score_gpt":0.33494769375301275,"score_spread":0.29639816823385945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210638994","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009638716,0.002477977,0.00017746589,0.975382,0.012599925,0.000014533235,0.00006667098,0.00003055417,0.008287006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010407043,0.00085292873,0.00021180455,0.9596511,0.010673456,0.00007835169,0.00002404322,0.00006337366,0.018037857],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99041724,0.0036307103,0.0006691327,0.0010351043,0.0028292025,0.0014185925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97745377,0.017439965,0.0009797195,0.0005602423,0.0022345977,0.0013316722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013306923,0.0013062647,0.0016272477,0.0016010039,0.019131431,0.012976292,0.008171805,0.11213359,0.0128356945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0333548,0.0014369998,0.0020968185,0.0028747276,0.017678838,0.012995017,0.008881243,0.062314495,0.006386066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096954325,0.000031649026,0.00035659818,0.00021478218,0.000016156173,0.0005665996,0.00843285,0.00008448583,0.00027357932,0.055934776,0.9288818,0.005109865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037531605,0.00003327603,0.0015413954,0.0005974444,0.000025743877,0.00028051907,0.009755841,0.00016981676,0.00046823168,0.019477602,0.96750766,0.0001049926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03166907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052323356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11213359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008193461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008040658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07037461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236022458","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.12039","title":"Front and Back Covers, Volume 29, Number 4. August 2013","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Khat; Somali; Government (linguistics); Terrorism; Democracy; Law; Political science; Medicine; Politics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.03728264904816729,"score_gpt":0.37750355217173703,"score_spread":0.34022090312356973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236022458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040218933,0.0015457545,0.00030762848,0.0044513103,0.023379931,0.00026706688,0.0029788718,0.0012321832,0.965435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00068913883,0.0008749377,0.00011330064,0.0021560097,0.0034416467,0.00008505587,0.0011245372,0.00035974997,0.9911556],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913436,0.00006492796,0.000034146084,0.00008508404,0.00053152326,0.00014985583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724376,0.00040862698,0.00013198951,0.0002147718,0.0013950134,0.00060583703],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007256714,0.0014459278,0.000980308,0.0017253056,0.002634479,0.0076862723,0.0014358131,0.0030444812,0.8153893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045939093,0.0007392351,0.0008818868,0.0018342695,0.0008571396,0.0037562826,0.0024350455,0.0025684652,0.7539202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016427977,0.000024775409,0.000043414242,0.00005007936,7.335176e-7,0.000018193636,0.000007732973,0.000012519793,0.0001063535,0.0003322552,0.98975384,0.009633612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010709662,0.000020005818,0.0007330496,0.000105392544,0.0000014495747,0.000032994812,0.000044094413,0.000033652155,0.00008723221,0.00025024274,0.99867463,0.000006668056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00588955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01213927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8153893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001832942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019073843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26332474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240088029","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8322.2008.024c2.x","title":"Front and Back Covers, Volume 24, Number 2. April 2008","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Film director; Front cover; Feeling; Front (military); Subject (documents); Indigenous; Sociology; History; Art history; Cover (algebra); Psychology; Movie theater; Geology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0343848670230043,"score_gpt":0.2856023423028106,"score_spread":0.2512174752798063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240088029","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00070485927,0.004620458,0.0005081256,0.0039343187,0.02117013,0.00020651071,0.0032515526,0.0012695909,0.9643345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011617753,0.0016424585,0.00016696563,0.00079028565,0.0025253831,0.000050116447,0.0008114205,0.00037521942,0.9924763],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994287,0.00006437625,0.000024683106,0.000074444244,0.00032902177,0.000078777935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984816,0.0003109817,0.00007715107,0.00016552946,0.000657303,0.000307519],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068927946,0.0011825017,0.0007588996,0.001891113,0.0017089352,0.006644341,0.0010748463,0.0017553412,0.79533017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028269459,0.0006509291,0.0006392079,0.0016686734,0.00055729365,0.0038898622,0.0020947743,0.0018921413,0.65017676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020003234,0.000018770845,0.0000482453,0.00007922947,0.0000012494893,0.000020054003,0.000024971658,0.000011756155,0.00016530721,0.00054460415,0.98170793,0.017357985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005919196,0.000015929849,0.00073579996,0.00011164571,0.0000019065322,0.00004870802,0.0000701971,0.00002708069,0.000088242,0.00022989124,0.99865985,0.000004669248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025271394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00436108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20466983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013203928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008149496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29193664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241627236","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.12119","title":"Farewell Lord Jeffrey Amherst: Debate over Amherst College's institutional anchorage in history (Respond to this article at http://www.therai.org.uk/at/debate)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; History; Subject (documents); Quarter (Canadian coin); Identity (music); Classics; Law; Media studies; Religious studies; Political science; Sociology; Art; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Library science","score_opus":0.030444824790069522,"score_gpt":0.33812957986312764,"score_spread":0.3076847550730581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241627236","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006124257,0.027534313,0.00013499384,0.897983,0.008026007,0.000009733721,0.000029587263,0.00002905384,0.060129058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31726882,0.024350965,0.00038537945,0.4919647,0.016485836,0.0000693399,0.000036273676,0.0001748341,0.14926387],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510115,0.0019547127,0.00014329699,0.000504518,0.001263682,0.0010325741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99071664,0.004877198,0.000604462,0.00025620687,0.0010062867,0.002539253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051950156,0.00033000013,0.000513026,0.0013090974,0.027518004,0.01283224,0.0020350253,0.01657432,0.028024862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012502368,0.00049070816,0.00025964496,0.002083053,0.024348069,0.008958375,0.006608468,0.013441514,0.0025056598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002592308,0.000025193654,0.0005956756,0.00014470294,0.000006864552,0.0006073663,0.028148029,0.000026640904,0.00015833946,0.16572125,0.78417456,0.020365402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068489353,0.000009717807,0.0016760463,0.00039846773,0.0000043411223,0.0002010473,0.021812264,0.000021660802,0.00012280542,0.007984969,0.96773446,0.000027316979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14730409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2235897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14730409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016824804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015495353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29289335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241823585","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.12088","title":"Confucius institutes (Respond to this article at http://www.therai.org.uk/at/debate)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Global Education and Multiculturalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Association of Canadian College and University Teachers of English","funders":"","keywords":"Boycott; Academic freedom; Relation (database); Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Higher education; Library science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.027073535989601105,"score_gpt":0.3571146689076013,"score_spread":0.3300411329180002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241823585","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023731727,0.005741337,0.00039819648,0.7908054,0.012860997,0.000023875707,0.00021582819,0.00018358754,0.18739763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045822278,0.0025593233,0.0005365698,0.5872044,0.0048662266,0.00006668005,0.00014471429,0.00035375616,0.3584461],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996316,0.0007233357,0.00016817023,0.00033177796,0.0013964084,0.001064349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99339986,0.0037285313,0.00045305068,0.00025153908,0.0011784551,0.0009885614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046871738,0.00042498793,0.0004895432,0.0007122834,0.008147866,0.0077822045,0.0018777087,0.023646211,0.06375365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010727245,0.000520244,0.0007045097,0.0010879651,0.005150968,0.00783913,0.004098999,0.019795798,0.019597042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018486096,0.000008170956,0.000220276,0.000051403775,0.0000028984568,0.0001659456,0.0029284535,0.000014557723,0.00014607838,0.0518448,0.9375258,0.0070730736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037005377,0.0000044757126,0.00048429662,0.000048965823,0.0000029557077,0.00007369277,0.0019088864,0.00001482901,0.00014712117,0.002004791,0.99528956,0.000016721191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056145202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07890003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06375365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059907897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004149547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21327722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244998377","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.12468","title":"Front and Back Covers, Volume 34, Number 6. December 2018","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apollo; Geographer; Front (military); Globe; Astronomer; Witness; Art history; History; Art; Philosophy; Geography; Cartography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.029527815169842334,"score_gpt":0.38290601571567195,"score_spread":0.35337820054582963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244998377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003491859,0.0013212115,0.00027493876,0.001464392,0.011501984,0.00015867592,0.003937013,0.0012389388,0.97975343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007668711,0.0007260589,0.000106099535,0.0005521577,0.0018318297,0.000053637566,0.0014571022,0.0004898672,0.9940163],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993717,0.000052160092,0.000027644879,0.00009976964,0.00033477257,0.00011403628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977574,0.00029221608,0.00009252348,0.00018469339,0.0010790206,0.0005941094],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005588926,0.0016335469,0.0010169995,0.0022610559,0.0023649717,0.0074884337,0.0013131966,0.0018697546,0.917067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031370183,0.00066396495,0.0008253826,0.0022605765,0.0005888607,0.0047863983,0.0025956368,0.0019447524,0.87164485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022808528,0.000028314567,0.000059052596,0.0000938015,0.0000011529388,0.000022211178,0.000014865024,0.000016607157,0.00015715658,0.00046262966,0.9802445,0.018876925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008158502,0.00001839908,0.0006073255,0.000103482846,0.0000014262283,0.000041088075,0.000053421838,0.000030273111,0.00007764496,0.00026871145,0.9987847,0.0000052111886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002791775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006125457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08293301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012974043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009647318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11829388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248517290","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8322.2010.00736.x","title":"Robert McNamara and the limits of ‘bean counting’ (Respond to this article at http://www.therai.org.uk/at/debate)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Government (linguistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Private sector; Sociology; Vietnam War; Public administration; Management; Public relations; Economics; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.02067435370937544,"score_gpt":0.31829011961475423,"score_spread":0.2976157659053788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248517290","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000277005,0.01798773,0.0002622736,0.96331346,0.0043603927,0.000002714315,0.000011202483,0.00001547819,0.013769689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039293673,0.019885637,0.0010924677,0.86783856,0.013164807,0.00005808848,0.000022931985,0.00022315337,0.05842071],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98869574,0.0062274477,0.0004090536,0.0010431365,0.002654757,0.0009698744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97948337,0.015431244,0.001124047,0.0007216387,0.0019470572,0.0012926861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012044561,0.00066877785,0.0010618394,0.0011224246,0.0076235696,0.011414325,0.0036142562,0.02739887,0.016574545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0356217,0.0007615526,0.0007805861,0.0013683328,0.02026576,0.022681875,0.00437616,0.025415659,0.005367281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002906793,0.000009315573,0.0000693633,0.00007711021,0.000007095875,0.00009310533,0.0028880988,0.00003857804,0.000058915495,0.23599812,0.7504019,0.010329269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075862877,0.0000065812187,0.0001850877,0.00024104124,0.0000034359348,0.00010449331,0.00247797,0.00003579203,0.00008658026,0.035687152,0.96113604,0.000028330547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027507283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030179774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027507283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057519726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004073342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06369853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298395482","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.12755","title":"ANTHROPOLOGY'S THREE ONTOLOGICAL TURNS: <i>It is time for a fourth, from anti‐anthropology back to anthropology</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Anthropology; Digital anthropology; Four field approach; Sociocultural anthropology; Biological anthropology; Cultural anthropology; Anthropology of art; Applied anthropology; Sociology; Anthropological linguistics; Linguistic anthropology; History; Philosophy; Linguistics; Art history; Contemporary art","score_opus":0.05056258516127862,"score_gpt":0.3634659930116175,"score_spread":0.3129034078503389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298395482","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0101760775,0.018175565,0.018282743,0.74244946,0.01163893,0.00003709771,0.00011211537,0.00012166376,0.19900629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5828881,0.0198291,0.026928563,0.2777065,0.017079772,0.00046627905,0.00022513102,0.0005493099,0.07432725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931994,0.003831791,0.00024811554,0.0005479407,0.0015204052,0.00065230054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915997,0.0038673254,0.00068326894,0.0012442396,0.0011423329,0.0014631172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0097114425,0.00071795075,0.0006156364,0.001623501,0.006368372,0.016428193,0.0017120668,0.0049804715,0.006499914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008911051,0.0003433162,0.00058386836,0.0013796233,0.056247443,0.02217455,0.0074660974,0.01410533,0.001659884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014043075,0.000020913469,0.00023970447,0.00006491056,0.0000061154783,0.000037934173,0.006400495,0.00003055535,0.00009385861,0.9565654,0.029890213,0.006635774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010398643,0.000023103205,0.000662851,0.000307129,0.000007792697,0.000109038665,0.011644369,0.00012503467,0.00018875097,0.6222775,0.36461657,0.00002749923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007104598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006997398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016428193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047067795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065078903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051359653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311731850","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.12775","title":"Anthropology's three ontological turns: A reply to Marks &amp; Geller AT38(5)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Anthropology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059000633371721956,"score_gpt":0.3730720212391969,"score_spread":0.31407138786747496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311731850","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030578324,0.0023836803,0.00044422597,0.9867243,0.0065317955,0.000006015532,0.000023850776,0.00001178629,0.0035685492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014477105,0.001105095,0.0007755959,0.9619715,0.012867899,0.000081121914,0.00001598211,0.00009013628,0.00861551],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98639375,0.0060452837,0.0007444497,0.0025299464,0.0029331995,0.0013534221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96412116,0.027123282,0.0011938851,0.0012028634,0.0040463987,0.0023123596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021717839,0.001981651,0.002506505,0.0031268143,0.021795167,0.020696871,0.007536259,0.08463602,0.009261732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043181963,0.0014886708,0.0018639988,0.0028238278,0.06283611,0.033297703,0.014154117,0.10191457,0.0044560223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003183318,0.000023455445,0.00013199913,0.000104496496,0.000020219162,0.00015794505,0.0111074345,0.000054774784,0.00009377133,0.295178,0.68780214,0.005293863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046733938,0.000016465689,0.00046279974,0.00073658145,0.000039112925,0.0002007834,0.0154036805,0.00022395418,0.00028853584,0.31418037,0.6682885,0.000112491114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040530547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05973289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08463602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014836882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015816053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11485624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390014328","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.12844","title":"<i>Complexities of gender and sex</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Race, Genetics, and Society","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Sociology; Diversity (politics); Feminism; Gender studies; Biological sex; Gender diversity; Transgender; Epistemology; Anthropology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022994763924512822,"score_gpt":0.2977065937520255,"score_spread":0.2747118298275127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390014328","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012810554,0.06332456,0.0013337908,0.47680947,0.41732448,0.000015514182,0.000031026255,0.00004523192,0.03983491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042447276,0.06509715,0.0011628635,0.2237434,0.623312,0.00007481376,0.00004491645,0.00012889027,0.043988694],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671495,0.0012508741,0.0001636347,0.0004023815,0.001140511,0.0003277159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992712,0.005099924,0.0003572299,0.0001837025,0.0010965419,0.00055059296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033447153,0.00085752923,0.0010170533,0.0011405803,0.007031671,0.011294861,0.002113883,0.0059618345,0.0041371062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009785936,0.0003383784,0.00066167006,0.00088333496,0.013913863,0.006811366,0.0026140495,0.011107538,0.0011790307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029229155,0.000009908585,0.00026500353,0.0003459523,0.000011917366,0.00031956233,0.0051699486,0.000037849983,0.00025699678,0.08948904,0.8860845,0.017980028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003876575,0.000015052388,0.00057762547,0.00056122045,0.000009816846,0.00025301566,0.004098999,0.000058900856,0.00010315185,0.024765207,0.9695361,0.00001694233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006970856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013962583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011294861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003524115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038799273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02556932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410925680","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.12963","title":"Caring for Pacific salmon: Reconsidering salmon‐human relationships","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Today","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fishery; Pacific ocean; Sociology; Economic geography; Geography; Biology; Oceanography; Geology","score_opus":0.11155762361763762,"score_gpt":0.4208383585680141,"score_spread":0.3092807349503765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410925680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65450364,0.011384582,0.0064023463,0.20351961,0.0010037855,0.00010191714,0.0000413119,0.000040738734,0.12300212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98150486,0.0056740027,0.0014217274,0.006726578,0.00008973663,0.000042240084,0.000011229416,0.000013937979,0.004515634],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99564385,0.0029120333,0.000059462465,0.00018580754,0.00035871024,0.0008401966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636024,0.0015382153,0.0003387112,0.00012133838,0.0004925381,0.0011488607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006139049,0.0003411659,0.0003599682,0.0007690976,0.020771343,0.008080239,0.0019061981,0.002583939,0.0025431134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005825533,0.00037395622,0.00024838658,0.0007941444,0.038536906,0.0062204194,0.0096953325,0.0058684256,0.0002468473],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008312817,0.000021921185,0.004119158,0.00008812646,0.000006545428,0.0005196958,0.9624971,0.000044768203,0.00019168244,0.019246185,0.0025007057,0.010755868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001758659,0.000018544637,0.0022247974,0.00019345547,0.0000061341098,0.00012904413,0.9683025,0.00005053532,0.00004401691,0.0050410847,0.023978727,0.000009277842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28225335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45805988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28225335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011855751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03800464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5612209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}