{"meta":{"query_hash":"294182fa92b1","filters":{"venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform"},"cohort_total":82,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":82,"exported":82,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/294182fa92b1","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Appeal%3A+Review+of+Current+Law+and+Law+Reform"},"results":[{"id":"W102505703","doi":"","title":"Returning to Find Much Wealth: Identifying the Need for a Revised Judicial Approach to Aboriginal Kinship in British Columbia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Legislature; Statutory law; Political science; Law; Sociology; Fictive kinship; Kinship care; Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.04992723044586038,"score_gpt":0.3764465545138259,"score_spread":0.3265193240679655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W102505703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33069408,0.12501071,0.002957231,0.21949351,0.0013210804,0.00031032116,0.00016619414,0.00005654959,0.31999043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91427946,0.029840242,0.0024082619,0.021428077,0.00016470607,0.000092967224,0.000060241895,0.00003207158,0.03169401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947608,0.0018003953,0.00026503784,0.00040893455,0.0016084169,0.0011564019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871995,0.005756847,0.0004435025,0.00031682427,0.005248141,0.0010351962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008212035,0.00019141652,0.0003831725,0.0034240216,0.02409265,0.011606641,0.0027148023,0.0034817415,0.0027270308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019324869,0.00034214745,0.00015655707,0.0037535392,0.015415966,0.002598434,0.003559531,0.005542811,0.00018948366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040103932,0.000071642324,0.017758325,0.00097083877,0.000028522089,0.0028358311,0.2143176,0.00081819703,0.0012327619,0.50653553,0.0572078,0.19818299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028837154,0.000044835033,0.06992119,0.0030314995,0.00009645314,0.0006900262,0.27652612,0.0010814769,0.0007236421,0.038932897,0.60872406,0.00019893158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98249394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09370885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09370885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1877376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6799085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486995240","doi":"","title":"MSM Blood Donation Ban: (In)equality, Gay Rights and Discrimination under the Charter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Sexual orientation; Guard (computer science); Men who have sex with men; Gay rights; Homosexuality; Political science; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Gender studies; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Medicine; Politics; Syphilis; Virology","score_opus":0.09598221172391092,"score_gpt":0.39327965404110077,"score_spread":0.29729744231718985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486995240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00953512,0.23290312,0.002210121,0.23613179,0.006776831,0.0004278829,0.0012076228,0.0002355452,0.510572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25543603,0.17479359,0.0069206185,0.38597465,0.0041742222,0.00055346603,0.0016083932,0.000118447846,0.17042053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99215525,0.0007585728,0.00021219795,0.0005024201,0.00510783,0.0012637846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701524,0.0007770117,0.00020910702,0.00012188012,0.0015134898,0.00036336572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049464554,0.00047567723,0.00043195172,0.002142187,0.006958611,0.0043904935,0.003162058,0.0072965063,0.00645298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008871632,0.0003705955,0.00043103553,0.0026052054,0.009763666,0.0017058743,0.0020963775,0.007224814,0.0007992263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025755175,0.000074199415,0.0010465218,0.00060451863,0.000011358141,0.00020023432,0.0033533531,0.00019929302,0.00046957235,0.4969225,0.36164635,0.13544632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022474522,0.000025275584,0.005905385,0.0014812512,0.000025189194,0.0001235764,0.00084382005,0.0001155159,0.0003444802,0.009370702,0.9816985,0.00004393308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.938932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95040023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.938932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040635724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13034067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29483414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505095038","doi":"","title":"Section 6 of the Indian Act and \"The Second Generation Cut-off Rule\"-–A Factum","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Treaty; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Genealogy; History; Politics","score_opus":0.029928511596743534,"score_gpt":0.30122784997285057,"score_spread":0.27129933837610704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505095038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029364012,0.13205579,0.004116934,0.16418083,0.012228245,0.0001930828,0.000763433,0.00010107976,0.6834243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14088249,0.16554065,0.009358619,0.38201565,0.024108311,0.00085935515,0.001484204,0.00022154406,0.2755292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99229854,0.0017105879,0.00045470195,0.0005751031,0.0040537273,0.0009073767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955329,0.0023691095,0.00042271923,0.00023457808,0.0012432078,0.00019745094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065459874,0.0005391594,0.00049391866,0.0023413405,0.004338994,0.006885114,0.0026180246,0.0098689785,0.005540984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009263352,0.00051002356,0.0008683392,0.0024155108,0.008167702,0.0033329814,0.0014727778,0.011477823,0.0030578673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007357719,0.000027791853,0.00035972105,0.0001910169,0.0000038671055,0.00014783026,0.0007338865,0.00016444872,0.0001015235,0.73164415,0.25182223,0.014796145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036293002,0.000014698695,0.0010172075,0.00094890693,0.000008479292,0.00014571873,0.00028641324,0.00008143316,0.000117601056,0.027157547,0.9702002,0.000018197868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.081665024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06986475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91833496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060419613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014015819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16237938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507312992","doi":"","title":"Blasphemy and the Modern, \"Secular\" State (2012 recipient of the McCarthy Tétrault Law Journal Prize for Exceptional Writing)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Blasphemy; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Philosophy; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.020546889403505034,"score_gpt":0.2969574549642093,"score_spread":0.27641056556070426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507312992","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009732547,0.18690987,0.00034698113,0.6747827,0.015138764,0.000021759148,0.00012823073,0.00002794884,0.11291133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4348172,0.14608558,0.0005434221,0.17335156,0.025016032,0.00008096267,0.0001728258,0.00010688959,0.21982555],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921453,0.00028564333,0.000030099867,0.000096563024,0.00021750088,0.0001555773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987099,0.00053325994,0.00013406976,0.000045726618,0.00026148843,0.0003155976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001951226,0.00022561394,0.00028720437,0.0008664754,0.0060133436,0.007705889,0.0006030788,0.0036141358,0.009022065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003283782,0.00021074055,0.00016406387,0.0010731939,0.009008374,0.003964503,0.0018484516,0.004539955,0.00071330304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013436096,0.00002476783,0.00081887003,0.00026695896,0.000008299326,0.00016664159,0.00831007,0.000046714867,0.00009628411,0.41106305,0.53689224,0.042292785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011156976,0.0000134593565,0.0048137843,0.00113054,0.000009925084,0.00013230114,0.008112867,0.0000589299,0.000113843475,0.039030265,0.94655585,0.000017022548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07574061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14933085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07574061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005593807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008410818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15059948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526267715","doi":"","title":"The Portrayal of Sharia in Ontario","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sharia; Business; Islam; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.030652736463273954,"score_gpt":0.327599301049737,"score_spread":0.29694656458646307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526267715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30334568,0.018776206,0.00041822603,0.15685794,0.0008937876,0.000050693434,0.0005108024,0.000058031965,0.5190887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9241315,0.007599378,0.00014954525,0.008862067,0.00020042229,0.000017609438,0.00005748205,0.000032174445,0.05894983],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964886,0.00037677618,0.00009013398,0.00018063013,0.0019163109,0.000947507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948449,0.0018631018,0.00072992616,0.00015895208,0.0016517773,0.00075122685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021528075,0.00018998732,0.00030981642,0.0019210177,0.021481207,0.0076411646,0.0014926078,0.0039052947,0.010067574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009231796,0.00031553255,0.00022300477,0.0041783713,0.012590164,0.0017427017,0.0035186121,0.003049381,0.00037662065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015861285,0.0000466817,0.02819849,0.0010435001,0.000041585346,0.003386837,0.3645324,0.00030032275,0.0011898482,0.33917394,0.19265598,0.0692717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015377525,0.000025554296,0.042333134,0.0008072357,0.00005093306,0.0003896994,0.13852227,0.0002498952,0.00031821112,0.0073389923,0.80988264,0.00006606854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9710467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99205315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0764317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0764317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08749365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5545534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535187990","doi":"","title":"The 1995 Firearms Act: Canada's Public Response to the Myth of Violence","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Gun Ownership and Violence Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Criminology; Homicide; Poison control; Political science; Suicide prevention; Computer security; Law; Medical emergency; Psychology; Medicine; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.03499631491318459,"score_gpt":0.3524307092356745,"score_spread":0.3174343943224899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535187990","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025701433,0.056406513,0.00068638497,0.80186576,0.0041160663,0.00015635502,0.0010815801,0.00010967355,0.109876215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38334468,0.053115126,0.0017764295,0.48771358,0.0030992795,0.00020480702,0.0007648646,0.000120691366,0.0698605],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9744673,0.001774408,0.0006802419,0.0011777175,0.016383655,0.005516698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700702,0.009762365,0.0015962925,0.0006310798,0.013827063,0.004113058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011628213,0.0006834838,0.0010424078,0.005409565,0.017150028,0.017308813,0.0074097514,0.023799697,0.006221437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050573647,0.00095448067,0.001012465,0.0064885337,0.019785492,0.0033632354,0.0038092665,0.01481527,0.000538808],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009906268,0.0001151508,0.010246903,0.0007598213,0.00009456684,0.0004758288,0.0076415204,0.0011598611,0.0003534977,0.2880161,0.62057745,0.070460156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001329048,0.000060413837,0.061317362,0.002237987,0.00021664241,0.00017095302,0.009119003,0.00079886743,0.00040133926,0.02129328,0.90405834,0.00019289259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99659806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2152551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2152551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.48829338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91019285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566279991","doi":"","title":"When Rights Collide: Liberalism Pluralism and Freedom of Religion in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Charter; Faith; Law; Liberalism; Public sphere; Political science; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Public reason; Theology","score_opus":0.02061554034061915,"score_gpt":0.28623967173311576,"score_spread":0.26562413139249663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566279991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22520646,0.0071237898,0.0023956723,0.21648078,0.0007165862,0.00012534564,0.00027465873,0.00007325654,0.54760355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92846376,0.0021103418,0.0011572633,0.011618414,0.00007439696,0.000030417219,0.00007046786,0.000052021274,0.05642297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901509,0.0012506864,0.00014333497,0.00080262317,0.0027943896,0.00485817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926553,0.0017069667,0.00031132516,0.0003171804,0.0019983638,0.0030107764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042451876,0.00034005826,0.0005803862,0.0016245138,0.054320056,0.01697552,0.0024885992,0.004464307,0.0069998465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010663794,0.00047597726,0.00054513663,0.003090128,0.028029857,0.0044930703,0.009209844,0.009071195,0.00029123924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054234748,0.00004599136,0.0063200835,0.000054614375,0.000024468001,0.0009063451,0.047362357,0.00076982484,0.00026968773,0.8868696,0.03380243,0.023520319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009232444,0.00003286725,0.028292714,0.00042645016,0.00007218809,0.0003223549,0.11181699,0.003196213,0.00062927505,0.26986066,0.58490276,0.0003553158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26633063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26633063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31208655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8509525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W161853060","doi":"","title":"Ownership of Rainwater and the Legality of Rainwater Harvesting in British Columbia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rainwater harvesting; Principle of legality; Water scarcity; Legislation; Environmental planning; Water resource management; Water resources; Environmental science; Business; Natural resource economics; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.022039966407337915,"score_gpt":0.29696313333014124,"score_spread":0.27492316692280333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W161853060","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05363552,0.7083931,0.0004596425,0.06263372,0.0008433858,0.000090574686,0.00059397356,0.000031138643,0.17331897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47224396,0.48080456,0.00070519536,0.018248271,0.0003152486,0.00006584779,0.0004971095,0.000023207584,0.02709656],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996309,0.00045950597,0.00022058064,0.00032046856,0.001913368,0.0007770616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896874,0.00393081,0.0008545684,0.00022191196,0.004593326,0.0007120863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002949239,0.00022748107,0.00043090424,0.004444732,0.006141383,0.006944604,0.0022403682,0.0024194208,0.0043927557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106535815,0.00040884636,0.00026768717,0.008466044,0.0081257885,0.0015678499,0.0015928957,0.0038323582,0.00022950585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008197539,0.00018104109,0.022869235,0.0050653927,0.000104663,0.0015746234,0.011054494,0.0019877,0.0008774984,0.3211973,0.16697459,0.46803156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028031507,0.000041539366,0.11582654,0.01298444,0.00012993369,0.00029324606,0.008475292,0.00072719465,0.00038617,0.014469484,0.84647435,0.00016370612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9868608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99460924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09645022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09645022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1343261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6997986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1623190492","doi":"","title":"IMPAIRED EXCLUSION: EXPLORING THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW BRIGHT LINE RULE OF GOOD FAITH IN IMPAIRED DRIVING OFFENCES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Good faith; Economic Justice; Faith; Administration of justice","score_opus":0.1319890253518243,"score_gpt":0.35276777740927345,"score_spread":0.22077875205744915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1623190492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38475874,0.026586547,0.017438969,0.12698326,0.0005168513,0.00022608868,0.00010764348,0.000021001344,0.4433609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893963,0.0024869752,0.0015379913,0.0037509038,0.00015381168,0.000049134633,0.000013860303,0.0000055531614,0.002605505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99371284,0.00395158,0.00015545519,0.00048506857,0.00086588605,0.0008291714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9625682,0.03210627,0.0021288127,0.00077893806,0.0016853084,0.00073243683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013445493,0.00024479465,0.0006700615,0.0018782145,0.0042784503,0.00861251,0.0028291913,0.0063655726,0.0048373365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03908906,0.00034775533,0.00064905704,0.0014093542,0.03339368,0.009433429,0.004215876,0.006686666,0.00025050805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012841908,0.00012841234,0.005112379,0.0001418895,0.000017918774,0.0008744502,0.006343204,0.0005694556,0.00006535259,0.9639607,0.0016860645,0.02097176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009565675,0.00024070108,0.013026544,0.00083610887,0.00009075543,0.000506584,0.02267906,0.004230154,0.00016177932,0.9328071,0.025278538,0.00004702792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03229664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06876362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03229664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007559484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009327594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07110745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1634432811","doi":"","title":"Collateral Consequences: The Effects of Decriminalizing Prostitution on Women's Equality in Business","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Charter; Supreme court; Constitutionality; Law; Political science; Trial court; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.026649675391873042,"score_gpt":0.3345819929224372,"score_spread":0.30793231753056416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1634432811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067962125,0.32468772,0.0007956345,0.1651049,0.0014404677,0.00011534697,0.00041964278,0.000038655704,0.43943542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6736766,0.27092892,0.00043253196,0.025783127,0.0014148426,0.000050404527,0.00018042895,0.000024703106,0.02750842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963554,0.00086495274,0.00012603545,0.0001858079,0.0017909664,0.0006768208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99074745,0.0043073217,0.0008834818,0.00031292203,0.0031050907,0.00064379856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003668033,0.00021948892,0.0003349127,0.0021108123,0.006178843,0.0052056476,0.0014648652,0.0024177812,0.008733417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016177846,0.00019980341,0.0003174407,0.002974044,0.015187002,0.002476717,0.002314974,0.0030074997,0.00034407622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001189592,0.00015720534,0.0152747445,0.0013801609,0.000053459193,0.0013308285,0.008082633,0.0007269837,0.00025014326,0.554398,0.10416506,0.3140617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112858645,0.00021487,0.079861306,0.011221808,0.00030855706,0.0012757577,0.016148461,0.00077280233,0.0010010534,0.10746925,0.78146887,0.00014443447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7738616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8932127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7738616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021423372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04832462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45494032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1657918326","doi":"","title":"Macaraeg v E Care Contact Centers Ltd: Shortcomings of the British Columbia Court of Appeal's Analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Appeal; Legislation; Law; Enforcement; Political science; Duty; Common law; Duty of care; Business","score_opus":0.021623416832710705,"score_gpt":0.23302276331731495,"score_spread":0.21139934648460423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1657918326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044189967,0.08378288,0.0019926485,0.32106984,0.0020575114,0.0002927677,0.00090406777,0.00013572673,0.5455746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6324109,0.0419912,0.0025228574,0.24576783,0.00131013,0.0003636445,0.00048046876,0.0001390937,0.075013906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866464,0.0017345593,0.0005821543,0.0013471722,0.0066187507,0.0030707894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98284286,0.008664628,0.0006397455,0.00048956147,0.0061673825,0.0011958958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008855023,0.0004190187,0.0011191224,0.006861805,0.018870344,0.017688453,0.0058355248,0.015712062,0.0062183947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026316043,0.00095261505,0.00064610934,0.007466648,0.011706358,0.0035461665,0.002540489,0.016518088,0.0010777937],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051952415,0.00007625841,0.004050604,0.00059811724,0.000045428234,0.0013940835,0.0054275775,0.00064303103,0.0003392068,0.70019054,0.23296085,0.05422235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010613295,0.000049923012,0.02371962,0.0059312424,0.00026192487,0.0006611692,0.010710378,0.0017451145,0.00072618684,0.099486776,0.8562978,0.00030369562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95232064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9803386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081976466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.081976466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14991482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59478366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1659725686","doi":"","title":"CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada: Case Comment on a Landmark Copyright Case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Landmark; Law; Property law; Property (philosophy); Copyright law; Law and economics; Common law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Property rights; Geography; Cartography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02500410964801183,"score_gpt":0.2528883158151268,"score_spread":0.22788420616711494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1659725686","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03593354,0.0071672816,0.0011560761,0.5768176,0.0029477156,0.00027580955,0.0011589269,0.00020393495,0.37433922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18886688,0.00518242,0.0010351045,0.50578076,0.0011346617,0.00022951627,0.00024839782,0.00013465225,0.2973876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943045,0.0002773589,0.00014891455,0.0006462347,0.0023137005,0.002309296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946331,0.0022258004,0.00021183188,0.00018046322,0.0019510746,0.0007976981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003121922,0.0006798179,0.0006025485,0.0018373391,0.027620146,0.008591592,0.004495357,0.037913807,0.010253954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010751055,0.00096758176,0.0008848824,0.003933916,0.006746143,0.002928579,0.0021254616,0.015102069,0.0012434224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006266329,0.000036065136,0.0028201093,0.0001369362,0.000018693456,0.0028315927,0.007955728,0.0004245722,0.00067712093,0.27275112,0.7015114,0.010773948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047602512,0.00002574655,0.004427365,0.00025710248,0.00006560676,0.0003981804,0.005053141,0.00048872555,0.000714549,0.008974888,0.97938377,0.00016341025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.978828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074057475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.074057475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1621185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5373271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1662106987","doi":"","title":"Employment Standards for Non-Employment: A Legislative Framework for Agency Work in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Work (physics); Agency (philosophy); Political science; Public administration; Economic growth; Business; Economics; Sociology; Engineering; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.07310034734353324,"score_gpt":0.41644066513501765,"score_spread":0.34334031779148444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1662106987","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08209301,0.044513986,0.008671831,0.5211028,0.0057252194,0.0019129663,0.0042000557,0.00060968584,0.33117053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5749271,0.026080146,0.025554791,0.18585078,0.0020428088,0.0012075421,0.0016026853,0.0003811557,0.18235296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95682716,0.003535358,0.0026882826,0.0027715357,0.024163207,0.010014579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9402437,0.0140060205,0.0019839203,0.001392683,0.035743065,0.006630611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030972164,0.00087699847,0.00169049,0.008624835,0.029125348,0.02530176,0.013009435,0.020616958,0.00626377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060448933,0.0023194905,0.0022461014,0.0082760975,0.012756694,0.0046345964,0.005885416,0.017927038,0.00062290486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008201687,0.00026616486,0.012154977,0.0007728422,0.000088111854,0.00054980675,0.013839079,0.002312034,0.0013190027,0.6949991,0.22003105,0.053585757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021744573,0.00014108302,0.09101686,0.0044340133,0.00028409323,0.00019204587,0.014860338,0.004171393,0.0009800418,0.03683492,0.84616125,0.000706555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9952739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24711406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24711406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.6470685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87324095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1666379458","doi":"","title":"Customary Adoption in British Columbia: Recognizing the Fundamental Differences","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.026084210501789364,"score_gpt":0.30210399393213916,"score_spread":0.2760197834303498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1666379458","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25741988,0.22131847,0.0016768542,0.27306977,0.0019162003,0.00017480786,0.0010948784,0.00010557617,0.24322356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78410226,0.11177399,0.0013993237,0.06071766,0.000560569,0.00012060122,0.0004502202,0.00006144992,0.04081399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99268395,0.0007544306,0.00040618484,0.00057859154,0.0034574047,0.0021194152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98091733,0.007846577,0.0011009296,0.00049846637,0.008238335,0.0013983061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005798729,0.00029328783,0.0007025409,0.0048898216,0.009962628,0.008843145,0.003601886,0.0066045034,0.0035881018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024093412,0.00055721233,0.00043108626,0.010199797,0.010449113,0.0020946735,0.0028358016,0.009613919,0.00024095166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011557958,0.00023796098,0.07037127,0.0019085087,0.00011305625,0.002932996,0.031289667,0.0013866309,0.0013567947,0.4123154,0.16422951,0.3137427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005851189,0.00008920994,0.37506863,0.007118901,0.00026883086,0.0008693808,0.033107765,0.0014928781,0.0008220377,0.030396985,0.550448,0.00025893885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9825832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08233947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08233947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17399167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5974175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1667207158","doi":"","title":"Canada Gets the Short End of the TRIPS Stick: Rethinking Article 70 and the Overall Applicability of Trips","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Geography; Engineering; Transport engineering","score_opus":0.019432537827566373,"score_gpt":0.2789115351609362,"score_spread":0.2594789973333698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1667207158","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021523133,0.008181971,0.0025145283,0.53746104,0.0030031002,0.00013323159,0.00089636043,0.00015764589,0.426129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35948634,0.008617491,0.002915856,0.47329837,0.0023676665,0.00021043111,0.00040218767,0.00040224253,0.15229936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96604073,0.0030946275,0.0009739247,0.0021923864,0.019458456,0.008239923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96260524,0.017610949,0.00079913344,0.0013958272,0.015626546,0.0019623279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0155551,0.00059246254,0.0012370392,0.0043117045,0.028205017,0.024277367,0.008960928,0.03712657,0.013661557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06282385,0.001086098,0.0015525107,0.006960473,0.02792754,0.0093991365,0.0068062325,0.029868314,0.0015723596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024599962,0.000025210633,0.0010369691,0.00014891598,0.000025277177,0.000288104,0.0068479343,0.0002886213,0.0001246526,0.72293955,0.2543186,0.013931537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005850323,0.000027579968,0.0069084396,0.001007689,0.00015373954,0.00012495993,0.01469236,0.00069367216,0.00042984053,0.10738805,0.86831224,0.00020299446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95822024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9725098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06502034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06502034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22168183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47175777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1680799814","doi":"","title":"Male Violence Against Women in Prostitution: Weighing Feminist Legislative Responses to a Troubling Canadian Phenomenon","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Phenomenon; Sex work; Human sexuality; Feminization (sociology); Sexual violence; Gender studies; Criminology; Sociology; Poverty; Political science; Law; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)","score_opus":0.04364949911502143,"score_gpt":0.326218913370109,"score_spread":0.2825694142550876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1680799814","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034174357,0.2363416,0.0010833915,0.52675545,0.00302054,0.00012835501,0.00014339246,0.000038500406,0.19831443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.604896,0.18855913,0.0019882757,0.16419558,0.0026803147,0.00017414613,0.00010921987,0.000074267635,0.037323073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98682797,0.0030555213,0.0003501138,0.0008841485,0.0060819373,0.0028002844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818372,0.009585095,0.0011107659,0.00030862112,0.006116932,0.0010414032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014851463,0.0004949187,0.00070428045,0.0073274695,0.028547417,0.012587788,0.003269969,0.009033302,0.0039162464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018505726,0.00058092165,0.00060044223,0.007795611,0.028402599,0.003493373,0.004245571,0.00827809,0.00025335],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000462438,0.000057424804,0.0047576134,0.0017936749,0.000041194427,0.0008434772,0.13937655,0.00042503825,0.0007959908,0.6271495,0.091300875,0.13341244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021166417,0.000046763736,0.017015696,0.0034984597,0.00009629306,0.0002144203,0.110656045,0.00023306932,0.00070000626,0.018044595,0.8493686,0.0001048286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94922405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.979193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11006658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11006658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1327335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7985927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1690248212","doi":"","title":"Customary International Law and the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Declaration; Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; Law; International law; Indigenous rights; Linguistic rights; General assembly; Right to property","score_opus":0.020779994751723894,"score_gpt":0.29159954132731164,"score_spread":0.27081954657558777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1690248212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068405014,0.2985953,0.0023081473,0.13807803,0.003674995,0.00009156727,0.000108869564,0.000044928493,0.5502577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42648527,0.32634962,0.009100693,0.14028476,0.0060831634,0.00033082478,0.0004079667,0.00011281657,0.090844855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876936,0.004168965,0.0009784396,0.0010665513,0.0047525107,0.0013399384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98731345,0.00860797,0.0016177797,0.0007190468,0.0013203417,0.00042149695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012990578,0.00033425214,0.00050164433,0.003435285,0.0043572057,0.0059729274,0.0021923555,0.007832887,0.0042001214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020369548,0.0004352107,0.00052872323,0.005299913,0.032511666,0.006562179,0.0047491626,0.009875658,0.00057451153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000498731,0.000018106537,0.00022985152,0.00047077495,0.000003876668,0.00013562482,0.005142674,0.00010300724,0.00011040435,0.94957745,0.017816827,0.026386525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010334738,0.000023233346,0.0022731528,0.0049385885,0.000015016994,0.00022284378,0.0036959883,0.000089037974,0.00018374577,0.15259363,0.8359162,0.000038271024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0464079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050539162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0464079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008395914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024666576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09227556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1740798251","doi":"","title":"Lawyers Gone Bad: Money Sex and Madness in Canada's Legal Profession (Philip Slayton)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03728442380868719,"score_gpt":0.35877167323164394,"score_spread":0.32148724942295676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1740798251","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002113284,0.19577892,0.000089691785,0.7789884,0.007822087,0.000023520815,0.00005909153,0.000015393614,0.015109593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06400502,0.2440947,0.00041959138,0.59767896,0.0106596965,0.000080188445,0.00008144797,0.000081411774,0.08289901],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962042,0.0007000016,0.00012397225,0.00034103723,0.0016614995,0.000969255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99147207,0.002790421,0.00034771787,0.00008644637,0.0028721178,0.0024312986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00367272,0.00059438957,0.00085525785,0.002617753,0.028222771,0.012395366,0.0024618534,0.016910814,0.008603321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012718852,0.00064661755,0.00051266333,0.004193597,0.013612907,0.00528187,0.003448204,0.017904276,0.0008959131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009181396,0.000029513407,0.00083153247,0.00024644626,0.000007710525,0.00015854191,0.005542263,0.000056960846,0.000040105635,0.01715408,0.94108653,0.034837246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029658482,0.000020135585,0.010443371,0.002713911,0.000043774035,0.00033557997,0.026979001,0.00009356673,0.00007807167,0.009345571,0.9498403,0.000077005905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9608736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99030614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050275426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050275426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20641488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36477548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1746168873","doi":"","title":"Net-Neutrality Regulation in Canada: Assessing the CRTC's Statutory Competency to Regulate the Internet","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"ICT Impact and Policies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Net neutrality; The Internet; Neutrality; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Law; Internet privacy; Economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01699031077299363,"score_gpt":0.27483924428061857,"score_spread":0.25784893350762494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1746168873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3744368,0.019127555,0.0033831883,0.12943792,0.0009528844,0.00058822206,0.0024206266,0.00020776801,0.46944502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9055894,0.010891464,0.0028965883,0.029608656,0.00021303573,0.00014304384,0.0007895372,0.00008317321,0.049785126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9674598,0.0014749648,0.0006646637,0.0013368658,0.022021648,0.0070421416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9437275,0.01166428,0.0018772063,0.00090152875,0.03754919,0.0042803464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017793594,0.00039833572,0.00067059556,0.007569801,0.01754314,0.01553216,0.005946445,0.006457044,0.004631736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047613293,0.0006128092,0.0009664918,0.008366955,0.010601048,0.0036577226,0.0033971127,0.007101316,0.00044308222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003269918,0.00052256737,0.111286715,0.0010523814,0.00018672149,0.0009444369,0.016646972,0.0040890607,0.0021683974,0.55863506,0.14224654,0.16189413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002914725,0.00026348952,0.37517527,0.003061712,0.0008673824,0.00036634828,0.035764124,0.008410563,0.004775597,0.032086503,0.53835773,0.00057981187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99681026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99847203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2275197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2275197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47075218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89596766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1754954890","doi":"","title":"Moving Beyond the Bedrooms of Our Nation: Redefining Canadian Families from the Perspective of Non-Conjugal Caregiving","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coining (mint); Parliament; Perspective (graphical); Media studies; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Sociology; History; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.03597365728127832,"score_gpt":0.3149347394209247,"score_spread":0.2789610821396464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1754954890","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022407522,0.2214206,0.0012925587,0.5919457,0.0026519613,0.00006956416,0.00007540611,0.000029868343,0.16010688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6184081,0.17035997,0.0023339118,0.18057863,0.0012502107,0.00010923281,0.000068551344,0.00006186096,0.026829513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934169,0.0022902077,0.00011882602,0.00036379317,0.0019395133,0.0018707146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545056,0.0019220363,0.00022323636,0.00015870795,0.0013426448,0.0009029286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008275495,0.00051450275,0.0005537344,0.0028460475,0.03863077,0.010799355,0.0035797344,0.009244535,0.0033836192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009423462,0.00037684027,0.00044981725,0.003753889,0.056875423,0.005087229,0.004864746,0.009575639,0.0002565518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026781816,0.000029887022,0.0015152153,0.00037490355,0.000015531807,0.00082872773,0.13657252,0.00026116136,0.00028032545,0.68315077,0.10517033,0.07177378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002235713,0.000020630165,0.0056489906,0.0020093736,0.000035728364,0.0003750739,0.117958665,0.00015576469,0.00022141014,0.051046733,0.822406,0.000099234196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13853674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13853674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26419282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1787790696","doi":"","title":"Benevolent Grandfathers and Savage Beasts: Comparative Canadian Customary Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.07665035861705931,"score_gpt":0.3391201210979738,"score_spread":0.26246976248091447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1787790696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3496484,0.05366816,0.0010189124,0.049988005,0.0005940657,0.00009312862,0.00043700344,0.00003796797,0.54451436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9389263,0.014845135,0.00056315906,0.004919032,0.000076753306,0.000035031575,0.00012593034,0.00003668992,0.04047189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99398345,0.0007146299,0.000119522694,0.0005594412,0.002162895,0.0024599878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947524,0.0016871964,0.00028543308,0.00020326568,0.0023209385,0.0007507814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048382822,0.0004925604,0.0009108281,0.0058201193,0.045992434,0.011901724,0.003918209,0.0056757396,0.012414627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0156102525,0.0006125736,0.00054412097,0.011646028,0.025078531,0.004446222,0.005466648,0.0057522943,0.0004403155],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091960064,0.00007564155,0.0148211,0.00041260046,0.000035081775,0.00095984736,0.19352329,0.00027814964,0.00026103764,0.6586246,0.043819934,0.08709679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036938458,0.00005043354,0.118581235,0.001791368,0.00016001692,0.00059373205,0.32291573,0.00050699234,0.0003126198,0.035316262,0.5195396,0.00019514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99519414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13317786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13317786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20869614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96627754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1789059136","doi":"","title":"Are Men Who Have Sex With Men Safe Blood Donors","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Law; Spring (device); Political science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.017892059692843285,"score_gpt":0.31755273805945283,"score_spread":0.29966067836660953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1789059136","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07058147,0.24664356,0.0002743679,0.49025202,0.004020023,0.00008811315,0.00020011445,0.000015713267,0.18792465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5468894,0.23522052,0.0003348717,0.16681318,0.0032660535,0.000078410034,0.00010846692,0.00001627332,0.047272872],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974565,0.0010958159,0.000095668904,0.00012248113,0.0007617231,0.00046775411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529725,0.002510309,0.00088547746,0.000091218164,0.00067460333,0.0005410776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003085217,0.000114396076,0.00032912727,0.000726562,0.0036096864,0.0026895965,0.0005616631,0.0030214866,0.0048916503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012766132,0.000312707,0.00020191158,0.0007171206,0.0058264914,0.002046617,0.0008108794,0.0026318491,0.00069521955],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020225933,0.00022805347,0.047573045,0.0024935568,0.000099897006,0.0012110587,0.06743773,0.00010817338,0.00084666314,0.21860515,0.3706501,0.2905443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010152781,0.00012311526,0.06863904,0.0042532077,0.00009369277,0.0010466623,0.066271126,0.000048844995,0.00038366218,0.024779683,0.83419955,0.00005989519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11971718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3138493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11971718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028663871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008960001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23804069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1805019232","doi":"","title":"“None of that Paper Stuff Works”: A Critique of the Legal System’s Efforts to End Domestic Assault in Nunavut","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.02012773563025572,"score_gpt":0.3390095640473754,"score_spread":0.3188818284171197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1805019232","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031303648,0.0859214,0.0034771347,0.6633597,0.005421792,0.0000845938,0.000144698,0.000054488777,0.21023254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7091699,0.036262326,0.0028203554,0.2159562,0.003743524,0.00023843488,0.00007758001,0.00012156908,0.031610124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98311585,0.0075425985,0.0006274665,0.0017963727,0.0036598085,0.0032579333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835118,0.010565622,0.0008008741,0.000664951,0.0037194928,0.00073734013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024248147,0.00061297714,0.0010530034,0.0039677126,0.022667937,0.017772788,0.0066508087,0.025248844,0.0046377764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042172454,0.0007253115,0.00088788994,0.0033336717,0.057354115,0.008972911,0.006568757,0.0180942,0.0006697681],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000141149085,0.000026514588,0.0012045507,0.00026938439,0.00003067535,0.00014126483,0.029973358,0.00034348556,0.0001043851,0.90970725,0.0402801,0.017904926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006886793,0.00007922516,0.008928744,0.0059965453,0.00018982937,0.00018516408,0.06499404,0.0006273394,0.00075811055,0.2937326,0.6243133,0.00012623661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.435625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53440416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56437504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034389935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08998044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86617875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1823910484","doi":"","title":"Eli Lily and Company v The Government of Canada and the Perils of Investor-State Arbitration","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Arbitration; Multinational corporation; Expropriation; Corporation; Law; Government (linguistics); Conflict of laws; Business; Intellectual property; Foreign direct investment; Political science","score_opus":0.022759538474150902,"score_gpt":0.23933057496466362,"score_spread":0.2165710364905127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1823910484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010198542,0.11710659,0.0010632019,0.23247352,0.0010221394,0.000066014574,0.00017659663,0.0000837958,0.6378097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5054072,0.099760376,0.002207274,0.1627929,0.0013216082,0.00010751471,0.00021020426,0.000111412846,0.22808148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896158,0.0009032117,0.00023494192,0.00060615723,0.0061339755,0.0025058617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951395,0.0020331345,0.00038009483,0.0001941118,0.0018044434,0.0004486597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041321055,0.0003893575,0.00047649932,0.002322082,0.0132635115,0.012947824,0.0017453932,0.011665825,0.006474965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009855136,0.0003726258,0.0005641147,0.0035802955,0.016389105,0.0036710927,0.0021922805,0.009954533,0.000689555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014682868,0.000010307836,0.0005420275,0.00008987196,0.00000843837,0.00027820398,0.0011946529,0.00018375924,0.000098415345,0.8835772,0.09408648,0.0199159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003865315,0.000016159873,0.003409156,0.0010639484,0.000039904175,0.0002911568,0.0019137975,0.00063089665,0.00036838398,0.087560706,0.9045927,0.0000746322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94497967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9645064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06656187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06656187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13566895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4829424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1825135887","doi":"","title":"Full-text of APPEAL Volume 19 (2014)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Principle of legality; Charter; Political science; Human rights; Milestone; Desert (philosophy); Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.028033673872029607,"score_gpt":0.3324681279183465,"score_spread":0.3044344540463169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1825135887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008328236,0.0016007943,0.00020352329,0.016056946,0.008165678,0.00040655755,0.0021645448,0.00048596473,0.9700832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031054816,0.00055450096,0.000102647515,0.014670872,0.0038896175,0.00024157588,0.00061644806,0.00013633126,0.97668254],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757224,0.00015499843,0.000105393345,0.00026968526,0.0013603326,0.00053734233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658054,0.00077722385,0.00007728116,0.0003249491,0.0017346683,0.0005053533],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017746558,0.0009557624,0.0015699196,0.0035404842,0.008396644,0.010172198,0.003282306,0.017401272,0.5764566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009211659,0.00094048405,0.0015692888,0.0022407838,0.0019334843,0.0025594414,0.0035751776,0.0073787295,0.3924302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016020354,0.00010180676,0.00021216147,0.000050880644,0.0000051852144,0.00011514455,0.000050267965,0.00003536813,0.000111841866,0.00649272,0.97852397,0.014284604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003383601,0.000020499576,0.0017512017,0.00020080766,0.0000099148565,0.000043305245,0.00014964743,0.00009618267,0.0000819192,0.0025566292,0.99503577,0.000020321066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05750289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.104880646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5764566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007023532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00990292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60413325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1826511065","doi":"","title":"Bill C-14: A Step Backwards for the Rights of Mentally Disordered Offenders in the Canadian Criminal Justice System","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Criminal justice; Mental illness; Government (linguistics); Criminology; Criminal law; Law; Economic Justice; Psychology; Political science; Mental health; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.058713703302784824,"score_gpt":0.3813573368201027,"score_spread":0.3226436335173179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1826511065","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064457064,0.40128306,0.0011593124,0.3546303,0.0053472132,0.00035028876,0.0004883397,0.00009445682,0.23020133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16548829,0.49639255,0.0058324896,0.27346355,0.0031553379,0.0003047037,0.00067799515,0.00008829797,0.05459689],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98941606,0.0009119486,0.00042300008,0.00049218256,0.0067963307,0.0019604254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99038386,0.0019583555,0.0004117671,0.00026097416,0.005876759,0.0011082408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074608726,0.0006238558,0.0006676952,0.0064781434,0.011212828,0.009813176,0.0043619825,0.010317031,0.0038641563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017762654,0.00055082137,0.0007927268,0.006032058,0.016610375,0.0026910715,0.0024151052,0.007935772,0.0006767055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022204711,0.00008821341,0.002415133,0.0018841937,0.00002816068,0.00070930226,0.0045358865,0.00064128294,0.000497297,0.40624622,0.4191067,0.1638255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002917929,0.000030411651,0.010018227,0.005233325,0.000052627813,0.00023376569,0.0022882193,0.00019590692,0.00016591843,0.01490363,0.96674037,0.00010848609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9792392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91594124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08405873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36794803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60989165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1826970685","doi":"","title":"Deconstructing the Panhandling Norms: Federated Anti-Poverty Groups of B.C. V. Vancouver (City )and Western Print Media","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Law enforcement; Law; Sociology; History; Media studies; Criminology; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.02107130154706257,"score_gpt":0.27911023903160415,"score_spread":0.2580389374845416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1826970685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2165509,0.06983813,0.0005098521,0.11488053,0.0011489508,0.00007126439,0.00017610827,0.00005137678,0.5967729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93231595,0.023028672,0.00022427332,0.0071713547,0.00021793337,0.00005138269,0.00008262334,0.00004838885,0.03685935],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719834,0.0009187912,0.00005902014,0.00018121634,0.00077623775,0.0008664539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99663866,0.0014381879,0.0002235075,0.00018243282,0.0009464783,0.00057079265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028755493,0.00042723256,0.00045772328,0.0043213917,0.03096624,0.016130079,0.0019203804,0.0033705572,0.005406213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005793242,0.00040469825,0.00011950863,0.005999707,0.035298876,0.0042889,0.0047136806,0.0041339956,0.00039914422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037409292,0.000045382993,0.0034228766,0.0002837108,0.0000126199,0.00082787575,0.60060817,0.00007617839,0.00023900029,0.21788815,0.06264424,0.11391434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010472339,0.000014272633,0.013311633,0.00090615905,0.000014694916,0.00015783825,0.50069785,0.000049037135,0.00022835702,0.010064193,0.47451502,0.000030413921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9193676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9718016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08063239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050223712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05133743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3644002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1827817526","doi":"","title":"Lawyers Gone Bad: Money Sex and Madness in Canada's Legal Profession (Philip Slayton)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal profession; Political science","score_opus":0.03728442380868719,"score_gpt":0.35877167323164394,"score_spread":0.32148724942295676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1827817526","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002113284,0.19577892,0.000089691785,0.7789884,0.007822087,0.000023520815,0.00005909153,0.000015393614,0.015109593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06400502,0.2440947,0.00041959138,0.59767896,0.0106596965,0.000080188445,0.00008144797,0.000081411774,0.08289901],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962042,0.0007000016,0.00012397225,0.00034103723,0.0016614995,0.000969255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99147207,0.002790421,0.00034771787,0.00008644637,0.0028721178,0.0024312986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00367272,0.00059438957,0.00085525785,0.002617753,0.028222771,0.012395366,0.0024618534,0.016910814,0.008603321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012718852,0.00064661755,0.00051266333,0.004193597,0.013612907,0.00528187,0.003448204,0.017904276,0.0008959131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009181396,0.000029513407,0.00083153247,0.00024644626,0.000007710525,0.00015854191,0.005542263,0.000056960846,0.000040105635,0.01715408,0.94108653,0.034837246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029658482,0.000020135585,0.010443371,0.002713911,0.000043774035,0.00033557997,0.026979001,0.00009356673,0.00007807167,0.009345571,0.9498403,0.000077005905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9608736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99030614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050275426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050275426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20641488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36477548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1830029431","doi":"","title":"Internet Gambling and the Canadian Conundrum","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Internet privacy; Advertising; Business; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.18356732183152807,"score_gpt":0.38853348263833437,"score_spread":0.2049661608068063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1830029431","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022427294,0.21141183,0.0011384463,0.5561831,0.003720344,0.00010686898,0.00075816846,0.00011724352,0.20413676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3746247,0.25445205,0.001999809,0.29943016,0.005341874,0.00019034736,0.000783708,0.00013662683,0.06304078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99215186,0.0006180323,0.00021308809,0.00062300346,0.004654709,0.0017394025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98815197,0.003521031,0.0005460304,0.00030661956,0.005264966,0.0022094166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051777447,0.0006575264,0.0010480379,0.005884454,0.011785482,0.00845486,0.0043690144,0.011215023,0.015673717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021636652,0.00065122196,0.0009882965,0.006852914,0.019110365,0.003037646,0.0036284144,0.011964705,0.0007108428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008428778,0.00022694978,0.005527135,0.0006294051,0.00004963067,0.00042303954,0.0027622844,0.00049449276,0.0001873411,0.46248886,0.35249516,0.17463149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001529995,0.0000609087,0.042909034,0.003985569,0.00017973878,0.0005387062,0.003843624,0.0009309149,0.00016728685,0.070620485,0.87641317,0.00019756412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97820216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095647134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.095647134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22400504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69397175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1854733578","doi":"","title":"Fathers Not Shortchanged by Current Adoption Legislation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Notice; Supreme court; Law; Best interests; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05667251494718964,"score_gpt":0.34153147649777804,"score_spread":0.28485896155058843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1854733578","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008917882,0.04280672,0.004126823,0.57326204,0.09679458,0.00010600129,0.00019285925,0.00047004514,0.273323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.088418745,0.022278314,0.003793365,0.66494614,0.027010417,0.00017379527,0.00027048765,0.00037684798,0.19273195],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97761744,0.004887469,0.0018875623,0.0026661272,0.011168718,0.0017726613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742433,0.0145281805,0.0023553513,0.0021643045,0.004984411,0.0017244524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01463547,0.00025337515,0.0005621018,0.0006306127,0.004714378,0.0070804637,0.0017050593,0.010508678,0.009770695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049923025,0.0005959609,0.00060362596,0.0006468062,0.0070971907,0.004860138,0.003549538,0.016339837,0.0032651718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044729175,0.000049396553,0.0011670919,0.00056783285,0.000014889428,0.0010810844,0.0106742,0.00006271248,0.0014487162,0.309138,0.5943165,0.08143492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004062153,0.000011983912,0.0004212823,0.00048704134,0.0000057103252,0.00014057838,0.00047360267,0.000015347976,0.00020382415,0.003246947,0.9949792,0.0000104056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019835413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03770417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019835413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050155595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01498808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077400684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1859312411","doi":"","title":"Insidious Idolatry: Canada's Aboriginal Leaders and the Legal Whiplash","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Whiplash; Idolatry; Political science; Criminology; Public relations; Law; Psychology; Medicine; Poison control; Environmental health; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030269696485967106,"score_gpt":0.3256762590916458,"score_spread":0.2954065626056787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1859312411","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14120616,0.2060952,0.00055174384,0.44943643,0.0035915854,0.00011884717,0.00027459755,0.000044736833,0.19868067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75758225,0.12757134,0.0007032527,0.07551987,0.0013891443,0.000070491755,0.00012898832,0.00003914222,0.03699556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601525,0.0004532521,0.000106868734,0.00022247629,0.0016146482,0.0015874754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993648,0.0020409417,0.0004899283,0.000100542384,0.0022189154,0.0015016122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035189465,0.00030471728,0.0005965201,0.0025798571,0.024665916,0.011252962,0.0035778538,0.007947808,0.005348545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012056028,0.00040107343,0.0003346038,0.0045326985,0.020869162,0.0022602042,0.0037531327,0.009254826,0.0003030829],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064977954,0.000245143,0.025774645,0.0017976465,0.00005224891,0.0023404537,0.17233844,0.00050819834,0.0003908848,0.3767162,0.23766229,0.18210879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044981593,0.000055832275,0.059039023,0.005664678,0.00014358464,0.0006810796,0.2609173,0.00028896096,0.00031360914,0.017684301,0.65503794,0.00012872119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98446566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91916776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08083226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36514992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5864818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868849460","doi":"","title":"Generating a Green Tax Policy For Renewable Electricity in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tax reform; Renewable energy; Energy tax; Economics; Tax credit; Business; Tax policy; Carbon tax; Finance; Economic policy; Public economics; Natural resource economics; Greenhouse gas; Engineering","score_opus":0.05203025605154761,"score_gpt":0.25139185552327387,"score_spread":0.19936159947172627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868849460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068999015,0.32609352,0.0026479056,0.21251583,0.0035472314,0.0002915538,0.001909948,0.00020490201,0.3837902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.592555,0.30853984,0.004110164,0.02730075,0.0008288863,0.00007462673,0.0010266487,0.00007103921,0.06549304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973858,0.00016745171,0.00006674376,0.00011239593,0.001721058,0.0005466392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961659,0.0005618383,0.00020270873,0.00008684536,0.0026754197,0.00030742027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025120538,0.0002437738,0.0002990476,0.0035495767,0.004948091,0.004274339,0.001567791,0.0019087073,0.0021591154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007851237,0.00023122938,0.00033442842,0.0052775797,0.0034971219,0.0012380595,0.0010040068,0.0023976238,0.00019590899],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058432164,0.000096795135,0.0049271244,0.0010200187,0.00003317327,0.0003388624,0.001034576,0.008404252,0.00041058564,0.6110526,0.1823067,0.19031689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041089537,0.000026991544,0.02031409,0.0018804906,0.000047877907,0.00007009177,0.0011948344,0.0023691885,0.0006955125,0.023968814,0.94931364,0.00007741556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99517953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13095985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13095985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2893707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9501847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1887086915","doi":"","title":"Apology Accepted: How the Apology Act Reveals the Law's Deference to the Power of Apologetic Discourse","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Philosophy of law; Political science; Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.04210419507847231,"score_gpt":0.3704819856627845,"score_spread":0.3283777905843122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1887086915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0683751,0.003476138,0.052903067,0.10382816,0.0027786305,0.00008677024,0.00010793068,0.00045706437,0.76798713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90084344,0.0008517247,0.006316007,0.0080369385,0.0004700523,0.000066334636,0.00004989787,0.00051710976,0.08284846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.989778,0.0056713084,0.00016791947,0.0010573816,0.0024479753,0.0008774378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857597,0.009006083,0.00088660204,0.0015134364,0.0021118165,0.00072234654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008413105,0.0004755634,0.0004285006,0.0014558281,0.014741227,0.024602603,0.0025637068,0.008897063,0.008861993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035817754,0.0006165419,0.0004582869,0.0009016968,0.058713116,0.015733965,0.0065112864,0.012027578,0.0020335035],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024256078,0.000021350337,0.0005468906,0.000044774613,0.0000065937843,0.00043602104,0.09098234,0.00022346035,0.0005923084,0.8852138,0.013310738,0.008597461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034819626,0.00004918106,0.00163201,0.0002994279,0.000023784902,0.00052760437,0.036498316,0.0021327897,0.0014804398,0.5336926,0.42352802,0.00010101698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040256824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043308914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040256824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010990892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009488765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080044985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905620639","doi":"","title":"BEYOND BOUNTIFUL: TOWARD AN INTERSECTIONAL AND POSTCOLONIAL FEMINIST INTERVENTION IN THE BRITISH COLUMBIA POLYGAMY REFERENCE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Intervention (counseling); Sociology; Gender studies; Criminology; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0735913462719884,"score_gpt":0.3497773878452161,"score_spread":0.2761860415732277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905620639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19223075,0.095222466,0.0009556153,0.3090269,0.0016403742,0.00012341066,0.000096563344,0.00006599936,0.40063792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.863216,0.02239586,0.00078768865,0.036199395,0.00018789746,0.00011343792,0.000046722693,0.000041531257,0.0770114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743074,0.00085729774,0.000044532535,0.00017830367,0.00048290513,0.001006238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965694,0.0012229444,0.0001589051,0.00012781567,0.0009046074,0.0010162718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031256238,0.00028144743,0.00035754437,0.0020799213,0.027087217,0.0063064024,0.002169161,0.0042449194,0.007240019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004376361,0.00030056018,0.00013679077,0.002562166,0.021657731,0.0018412048,0.00632172,0.0058777076,0.00040094022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093695795,0.0002206317,0.0066206623,0.00065441185,0.000021752154,0.0016954093,0.24273089,0.00030051774,0.001217008,0.3892655,0.12665766,0.23052181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029127852,0.000040011782,0.030593358,0.0012503647,0.000021189346,0.0002468222,0.16463242,0.00014798947,0.00044148136,0.015782623,0.786756,0.000058532223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9517882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9861259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07272248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07272248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12464523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.527641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950021427","doi":"","title":"A Second Chance for the Harm Principle in Section 7? Gross Disproportionality Post-Bedford","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Harm principle; Harm; Political science; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Charter; Sociology","score_opus":0.10357095539118184,"score_gpt":0.42127848035895976,"score_spread":0.31770752496777793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950021427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037594736,0.0068462426,0.014028424,0.29993004,0.004057661,0.000074951495,0.00013503086,0.00012022739,0.6372127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62622136,0.0018104585,0.0044381646,0.15009744,0.0023435208,0.00015133202,0.00006961687,0.00010401969,0.21476407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660313,0.000778677,0.0001010744,0.0006040291,0.0011012872,0.0008117867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985366,0.0007123078,0.00006716508,0.00015157796,0.0004014138,0.00013099652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003219773,0.00030742932,0.00037774484,0.00039274505,0.0058362386,0.0038768344,0.0012043816,0.0071932403,0.005269313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005850798,0.00027460832,0.000434668,0.00025137988,0.011598165,0.003496693,0.0020442826,0.0099901045,0.00088650273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008831365,0.000006195276,0.00019209302,0.0000096051535,0.0000019573772,0.000047746562,0.0007842105,0.00006240005,0.00007286384,0.9759305,0.019403752,0.00347983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020269314,0.00003459748,0.0015196399,0.0002250924,0.000014364845,0.00013500734,0.0010081234,0.000483055,0.0009756527,0.5808888,0.4146307,0.000064666136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10567581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16409416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8943242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007408363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006937801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21012145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950996903","doi":"","title":"A CRITIQUE OF THE BRITISH COLUMBIA RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE INDUSTRY’S USE OF DUAL AGENCY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Real estate; Agency (philosophy); Dual (grammatical number); Business; Estate; Real estate development; Finance; Public relations; Public administration; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05093970985968707,"score_gpt":0.3211113976777358,"score_spread":0.2701716878180487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950996903","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016325498,0.072750896,0.0020585614,0.61172265,0.0017438431,0.00004830695,0.0002252014,0.0000903681,0.29503474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56082815,0.045468442,0.0030659358,0.26731917,0.001436849,0.00015595474,0.0001587087,0.00014400968,0.121422805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98485816,0.0033582677,0.00043632224,0.0019435096,0.007677078,0.00172679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98159766,0.007716283,0.0007539836,0.0006742012,0.008211706,0.0010462259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00869444,0.00035711413,0.00066214503,0.0038979778,0.020591762,0.015179865,0.0041356822,0.011445191,0.0050896816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015392057,0.0007230913,0.00054435874,0.0058389087,0.031354874,0.0040993863,0.0025820325,0.017436186,0.0011590061],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001454759,0.000017426784,0.000984635,0.00018475161,0.000015679223,0.0002259511,0.008988782,0.00025870695,0.00019070951,0.7336273,0.230392,0.025099482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028827548,0.000014597155,0.0067108376,0.0010382225,0.00003296108,0.00016504826,0.00710311,0.00044550878,0.000261256,0.04754851,0.93657005,0.000081124665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94796634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.962472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076795235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.076795235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11118616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.557191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107990315","doi":"","title":"Expanding the Role of Culture in British Columbia's Adoption Scheme","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Government (linguistics); Cultural heritage; Public relations; Perspective (graphical); Ambiguity; Political science; Best interests; Public administration; Law; Business; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.026866553479299244,"score_gpt":0.32071451691811753,"score_spread":0.2938479634388183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107990315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26804885,0.062582955,0.0034180325,0.06599868,0.00072921993,0.00029707258,0.00048189439,0.000105563464,0.5983377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.919999,0.023555508,0.0026736013,0.010495676,0.0001140863,0.00013333603,0.00015975944,0.000032146825,0.042836793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99412656,0.001142532,0.00026314522,0.00044275683,0.0024869223,0.0015381927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901183,0.0035671934,0.00048710275,0.0005482888,0.004141627,0.0011375223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005880924,0.00022851386,0.00038532785,0.004182121,0.014271378,0.008873723,0.0029235624,0.0030221904,0.0052139293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013815503,0.0004505906,0.00028034538,0.0055921176,0.011292317,0.0020210173,0.004292141,0.004255989,0.0002644957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032711574,0.000049914786,0.018012078,0.00031134626,0.000023034747,0.0011814593,0.019784467,0.0009419011,0.000601588,0.7613334,0.03101968,0.16670837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005089517,0.00006751813,0.12829174,0.004312939,0.0001316649,0.00059539126,0.031259038,0.00264621,0.00076257886,0.07044106,0.76121914,0.00022191145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9694287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08505054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08505054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13680741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6170877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109330350","doi":"","title":"Marginalization through a Custom of Deservingness: Sole-Support Mothers and Welfare Law in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Workfare; Entitlement (fair division); Welfare; Political science; Social security; Welfare rights; Single mothers; Child support; Working poor; Poverty; Welfare dependency; Law; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.03633356149777631,"score_gpt":0.33882451322663243,"score_spread":0.3024909517288561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109330350","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13229485,0.35800067,0.0010461707,0.3328386,0.0020307014,0.00018274588,0.00050123036,0.000054417822,0.1730506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71518755,0.21660542,0.0012461301,0.04529585,0.00030021527,0.000114875824,0.00015691333,0.00004286778,0.021050233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634534,0.0005501451,0.00012405985,0.00034410215,0.0014949362,0.0011414643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935968,0.002038726,0.00045811746,0.00015834892,0.0027178307,0.0010301236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004851656,0.00023824758,0.0005311225,0.0019955738,0.0146391615,0.008628089,0.002854526,0.0033689784,0.0032016386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0090993345,0.00034348972,0.00032588973,0.004874307,0.018729929,0.0020994134,0.003507703,0.0048392173,0.00014693284],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052619624,0.0001107061,0.010912256,0.0020314632,0.000042100757,0.0013046934,0.05886073,0.00076919823,0.00047222638,0.6652767,0.09945943,0.16070792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040518335,0.000047069916,0.047476206,0.008153965,0.000105474006,0.00037497465,0.07058303,0.00065562286,0.0004498282,0.033963636,0.8379918,0.0001579407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19503826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19503826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4269661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93364155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147623616","doi":"","title":"Is the Province Liable? Leaky Condo Owners in British Columbia seek Compensation in Court","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Business; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03371472503803665,"score_gpt":0.29611829051930333,"score_spread":0.2624035654812667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147623616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68750733,0.0059350086,0.00038436466,0.10358496,0.00042782663,0.00016414767,0.0005259272,0.000041330783,0.2014291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9286748,0.0020262194,0.00016020217,0.016601922,0.00008611556,0.00003580223,0.0001210429,0.000019988533,0.052273933],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934023,0.00041314733,0.00016631802,0.00036341886,0.0013653153,0.0042895027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99047005,0.0029038966,0.0007097791,0.00020459775,0.0032955469,0.0024161928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003342346,0.00023241919,0.0006343086,0.0017719176,0.026197726,0.010974183,0.003542261,0.008744054,0.012294954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015764512,0.0007191347,0.00026724857,0.0033964189,0.007603387,0.0024813984,0.0036588726,0.0087891305,0.0008198399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003500736,0.00033864233,0.26148304,0.00060426036,0.00014924233,0.010549858,0.084472924,0.0014565901,0.0020466852,0.18084672,0.3567604,0.10094155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015945674,0.00010075838,0.34847948,0.0020655242,0.000346192,0.0013548111,0.29726812,0.0023343496,0.0010754957,0.019633174,0.3268315,0.0003510567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9878878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074746326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.074746326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18538551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5423251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171956750","doi":"","title":"In Pursuit of Equality: Rethinking the Constitutionalization of Labour Rights after Fraser","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of association; Collective bargaining; Charter; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Antipathy; Politics; Bill of rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.02561714340171738,"score_gpt":0.33083424275724893,"score_spread":0.30521709935553154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171956750","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031568818,0.023552697,0.022995215,0.47965097,0.0054089176,0.00013310084,0.00018273498,0.00017644974,0.43633103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74908096,0.0072191525,0.006078478,0.16142176,0.0035645035,0.00018815607,0.00009642414,0.00029106354,0.07205942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97174394,0.0087028835,0.0008136893,0.004539191,0.008071612,0.0061287233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98225635,0.012038453,0.00041900144,0.0014965974,0.0027406944,0.0010488761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029981963,0.000806404,0.0010762428,0.0017259513,0.027487347,0.017696667,0.004682789,0.017722862,0.004655875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03704938,0.0008273311,0.00075008377,0.0018360233,0.113397054,0.017297242,0.010349605,0.030590506,0.00059471314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009716852,0.000004787815,0.00011415468,0.000015780193,0.0000027172111,0.000046553396,0.0059666927,0.000104475774,0.000072427625,0.97879344,0.010448071,0.004421214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056755107,0.000029115285,0.00084145693,0.0005966562,0.000028279472,0.00006119526,0.006951759,0.00047890164,0.00069269387,0.581161,0.40897623,0.00012602315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.750109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78888977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.750109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05946749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08400791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50272524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222141872","doi":"","title":"Wrongful Convictions and the Avenues of Redress: The Post-Conviction Review Process in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Redress; Appeal; Criminal justice; Law; Political science; Commit; Prison; Criminal code; Criminology; Statutory law; Criminal law; Sociology","score_opus":0.040148865371233765,"score_gpt":0.3479604715189953,"score_spread":0.30781160614776154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222141872","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0125061935,0.8883609,0.00038709637,0.07138462,0.0017298786,0.000251856,0.0002653668,0.0000495809,0.025064556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2499071,0.71027565,0.0021010689,0.02977421,0.0011440653,0.0001998801,0.00040424702,0.000060292943,0.00613346],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9758607,0.0041251825,0.001671621,0.001611465,0.013835011,0.00289605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8766263,0.034000687,0.008622719,0.0015804016,0.067484885,0.011685011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023211982,0.00047995604,0.0012717915,0.00986413,0.009209297,0.010851325,0.0064927614,0.0043577617,0.0034569982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09035724,0.0010090484,0.00072580593,0.013784736,0.009171525,0.0024151294,0.0033574463,0.005632922,0.00033880482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034022666,0.00030345016,0.016998738,0.014078425,0.00029153726,0.0011204997,0.010000333,0.0010346436,0.00031689802,0.060317177,0.2087603,0.6864378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026359962,0.00026125336,0.14949846,0.04050095,0.0006756731,0.0008443309,0.008851334,0.0009787126,0.0006097762,0.0075652855,0.78950065,0.00044995666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9879667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99580306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2643085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2643085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.48160657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8532978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281574189","doi":"","title":"The Last Word: Media Coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada (Florian Sauvageau David Schneiderman David Taras)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Philosophy; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02516552826368531,"score_gpt":0.27815466520139986,"score_spread":0.2529891369377146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281574189","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056514028,0.18998918,0.00023865652,0.6531387,0.023550471,0.000035525125,0.0020707776,0.0001142644,0.12521094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19370775,0.1268383,0.00070993905,0.2734332,0.037257846,0.00009842199,0.0013450804,0.00037158915,0.36623788],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965383,0.00023611855,0.00009169566,0.0003027653,0.0022171696,0.00061387644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899463,0.0024781695,0.00042339994,0.00019343111,0.005968528,0.0009902006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018141778,0.0006825673,0.0008785797,0.006589307,0.015715167,0.010581591,0.0021092743,0.0074822805,0.022914242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013660164,0.00054305175,0.0004267144,0.008476266,0.004975712,0.0026316552,0.0018292094,0.00506172,0.0024042935],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007930831,0.0000052458754,0.00052509207,0.00010202544,0.000009195426,0.00006246351,0.0008024746,0.00004416596,0.00005496207,0.009053473,0.978007,0.011326003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007369815,0.0000043002597,0.007194355,0.0007241693,0.00002800906,0.00004925091,0.00190028,0.000079428624,0.000104709696,0.0014631874,0.9884121,0.00003277931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97589636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04378831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04378831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.066200584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31770796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283679196","doi":"","title":"The Privatization of Justice in Québec's Draft Bill to Enact the New Code of Civil Procedure: A Critical Evaluation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Code (set theory); Law; Political science; Hull; Public administration; Engineering; Computer science; Programming language; Marine engineering; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.040515454588618,"score_gpt":0.37968680152027295,"score_spread":0.33917134693165496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283679196","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08920888,0.046862278,0.003374943,0.58247656,0.006415533,0.0009817608,0.0016566259,0.00015537535,0.268868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68232214,0.010896126,0.0031817465,0.22292097,0.0019167436,0.000726715,0.00034768748,0.00014937903,0.07753848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9478406,0.0109991105,0.0014538703,0.0030745913,0.024886752,0.011745023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8946606,0.055700116,0.002483841,0.0030653507,0.040845588,0.003244525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055472773,0.0009290219,0.00146244,0.0063310484,0.02825129,0.022287725,0.008063593,0.026454672,0.007303795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0973048,0.0013000508,0.0018098862,0.00764798,0.026314424,0.007540369,0.0043963753,0.020404218,0.0004390964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022471747,0.00017138176,0.0040957513,0.00084841624,0.00017046437,0.00044300736,0.012127745,0.0018568875,0.00039400725,0.76991004,0.1831295,0.026628058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007962755,0.0003050659,0.060630653,0.0046872296,0.0010419905,0.0002445518,0.02617438,0.004517782,0.0019106503,0.07669888,0.8223176,0.0006749658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99195063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2589301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2589301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40181062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85953605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291911516","doi":"","title":"Why Stop Now? The Availability of Business Method Patents in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.056685859683391446,"score_gpt":0.3194741381362257,"score_spread":0.26278827845283426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291911516","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05576653,0.093759455,0.0015079863,0.58199775,0.002670862,0.00015506534,0.0025504255,0.00021598165,0.26137593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65091485,0.07305177,0.0022519866,0.19746123,0.0026649237,0.00011573241,0.0008420776,0.00021747973,0.07247996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9501108,0.0020182526,0.0016963797,0.0032322542,0.034122355,0.008820032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8626015,0.049088087,0.006610975,0.002676678,0.07092327,0.008099495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019623898,0.00046853907,0.001632827,0.009276169,0.01873812,0.025566585,0.0071028555,0.018039512,0.012940082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086618334,0.0011327907,0.0015581955,0.014042888,0.016002208,0.007491036,0.0035380023,0.013915832,0.00074818195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016098357,0.00015443063,0.013960268,0.0014925846,0.00013446,0.000960749,0.004803662,0.0012175117,0.0008214122,0.6022412,0.28660616,0.08744665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015495556,0.000090505106,0.056846153,0.0025971057,0.0003506407,0.0003254791,0.0054531465,0.0015551638,0.0009533613,0.033832036,0.89747643,0.0003650126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99567837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78487813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21512184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43861443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9103474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292892905","doi":"","title":"The Politics of Poverty: Why the Charter Does Not Protect Welfare Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Dignity; Politics; Law; Political science; Human rights; Jurisprudence; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.040835674136275965,"score_gpt":0.3142010506031132,"score_spread":0.27336537646683723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292892905","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059830514,0.24249518,0.0011498653,0.66308725,0.0015029028,0.000021896234,0.000052923217,0.000021851074,0.08568507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42671052,0.31777322,0.0020776095,0.2266736,0.0039645336,0.00009234965,0.00009204182,0.00009568116,0.02252043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99174666,0.0031591502,0.00016846221,0.0005384589,0.0032659806,0.0011212315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911738,0.005682993,0.0004568007,0.00020676851,0.0019823802,0.0004973757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008470657,0.00023050143,0.0005856711,0.0023275332,0.007875879,0.009383964,0.0017285782,0.0059413933,0.0025550507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013470772,0.00031771953,0.00029926377,0.0032838366,0.03383802,0.0060479576,0.0023657435,0.009414225,0.00042065018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008519749,0.000018447132,0.00042897434,0.0002831575,0.000006218795,0.00015311473,0.0051251054,0.00018454023,0.00007550531,0.85883296,0.0860196,0.048863832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016306296,0.000016125898,0.002534595,0.0024711129,0.000012034349,0.00014488238,0.009114015,0.00022213506,0.00012337636,0.26907405,0.7162425,0.000028821532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3446125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4659763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3446125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027172975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04447881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68521327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293347773","doi":"","title":"THE CRIMINALIZATION OF POVERTY: MONTRÉAL’S POLICY OF TICKETING HOMELESS YOUTH FOR MUNICIPAL AND TRANSPORTATION BY-LAW INFRACTIONS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Racial profiling; Dignity; Poverty; Criminology; Profiling (computer programming); Sociology; Law; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.048379570838448634,"score_gpt":0.33925986973236977,"score_spread":0.29088029889392114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293347773","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102820866,0.026958626,0.0019329817,0.62843585,0.006272741,0.00085102837,0.0015566391,0.0004750511,0.23069634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6295771,0.009510187,0.00388602,0.18812199,0.0016446545,0.00059875526,0.00042051953,0.00015638645,0.16608441],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99629164,0.00075174664,0.00010151048,0.00029415416,0.001342734,0.0012181704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99538994,0.0010129855,0.0004217421,0.00015565756,0.0014518425,0.0015679158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028808836,0.00051469455,0.00031417247,0.001774953,0.011961661,0.005016495,0.004088258,0.008356526,0.007473642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010294984,0.0005693848,0.000495966,0.0017442611,0.0047470983,0.0020381294,0.0034935488,0.0049396656,0.00037048952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009035073,0.00021176993,0.013729546,0.00042502364,0.0000513365,0.0012763534,0.009384339,0.00068355317,0.0012653879,0.26671785,0.62962425,0.07654029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010410164,0.0001101535,0.04643285,0.00050821115,0.0000622318,0.00026566355,0.00392521,0.0010184158,0.0007993469,0.0047102096,0.94193244,0.00013121346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9533064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97005403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046693623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03708967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09599228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2691056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295314895","doi":"","title":"Our Digital Selves: Privacy Issues in Online Behavioural Advertising","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Information privacy; Advertising; Field (mathematics); Targeted advertising; Statute; Legal aspects of computing; Subject (documents); Privacy policy; Online advertising; Tracking (education); Business; Personally identifiable information; The Internet; Political science; Computer science; Law; Sociology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04789086706286919,"score_gpt":0.373075907818106,"score_spread":0.3251850407552368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295314895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059742678,0.04723113,0.00479557,0.33886752,0.0006715343,0.00006851093,0.0001975586,0.000047779646,0.5483777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90050256,0.023025468,0.0014378238,0.048350155,0.00083489576,0.00004476068,0.0000751212,0.000027866161,0.025701461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909855,0.0038942904,0.00020402811,0.0005352678,0.0033846928,0.0009962468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98642135,0.0091447905,0.00092796306,0.00095643784,0.0019035183,0.0006459633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068925326,0.00018633447,0.00026506826,0.0018153449,0.011838609,0.012861949,0.0014170065,0.0059562875,0.0042034695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016104914,0.0002588535,0.00038935101,0.0032734647,0.040240042,0.008067278,0.003958777,0.005249909,0.0004450114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002045097,0.000036486177,0.0031757492,0.00013852984,0.000009839293,0.00045476455,0.03697078,0.0001400591,0.000117227944,0.87131387,0.02195896,0.06566335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015868241,0.00003493709,0.01368459,0.0016847317,0.00003649015,0.0011913325,0.0521824,0.0005282157,0.0004397367,0.33791524,0.59221125,0.00007533181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27642637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3059144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27642637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0155424075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018468307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5496348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295461420","doi":"","title":"The Edges of Exception: Implications for Indigenous Liberation in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Liberation; History; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.02209784259531498,"score_gpt":0.29779082802793055,"score_spread":0.27569298543261556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295461420","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1029749,0.043604326,0.0037373214,0.36042637,0.0016824187,0.00017160497,0.00056493416,0.00013331887,0.48670477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.853321,0.020629158,0.0034022485,0.06408791,0.0005084315,0.0000988891,0.00011874843,0.00012330619,0.057710394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98789364,0.0010923877,0.0003740326,0.0012442643,0.0048677484,0.0045279334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851952,0.005381507,0.0006463282,0.0005779069,0.006096226,0.0021029674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008149674,0.00038380918,0.0013299925,0.0034162495,0.041145626,0.022861835,0.0062675946,0.010941172,0.011211665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025002103,0.0006020089,0.0010305601,0.006443531,0.03878178,0.005408177,0.0072316825,0.014361618,0.00033942086],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002955862,0.000024740362,0.0030154148,0.0002601537,0.00003207842,0.00036575724,0.025898155,0.0005136082,0.0001434018,0.8951984,0.04275779,0.03176097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007328368,0.000029156214,0.024170734,0.0026428057,0.00021211182,0.00025171394,0.054685008,0.001368419,0.00044977228,0.17161934,0.7442305,0.0002672012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99626106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99817324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19089487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19089487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43980426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93844724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296451070","doi":"","title":"Social Assistance and the Charter: Is There a Right to Welfare in Canada?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Social Welfare; Welfare; Political science; Welfare rights; Law","score_opus":0.025906607714330166,"score_gpt":0.33455151569967934,"score_spread":0.30864490798534916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296451070","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025062652,0.043387003,0.00083923514,0.79306585,0.0031303347,0.00011189993,0.00073431904,0.00008135794,0.13358733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5031228,0.05655816,0.0024865775,0.32986498,0.0032517924,0.00019439164,0.0004738828,0.00015476445,0.10389268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97976696,0.0019690404,0.0005037641,0.0011985279,0.009685474,0.006876347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97884125,0.0060832743,0.00090951286,0.0004795624,0.008755341,0.0049310154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011097109,0.00071262696,0.0013598831,0.0044517554,0.030157898,0.021008544,0.0062618945,0.020238558,0.011980871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04007768,0.00085769885,0.0009770623,0.0077797305,0.026173797,0.0051723905,0.005690079,0.017650118,0.0005993156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007416127,0.00010931451,0.0050198096,0.0005377858,0.000056596647,0.00034968415,0.0070317043,0.00065645314,0.00016226852,0.67464113,0.2619236,0.049437474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015649042,0.00005225153,0.030878816,0.0028962733,0.00018330653,0.00014978589,0.017873526,0.0011795199,0.00028011698,0.10332636,0.8427323,0.00029114506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99575305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17853111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17853111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5666741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95278746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298650376","doi":"","title":"\"The Wal-Mart Way\": Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Social Change, and the Canadian Legal Landscape","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography; Business","score_opus":0.03141266923292917,"score_gpt":0.3181969658712287,"score_spread":0.2867842966382995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298650376","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040380932,0.13780992,0.0005117192,0.4657305,0.0015245102,0.00006751226,0.000578494,0.000054743003,0.3533417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82692015,0.05489455,0.0006802983,0.061629567,0.0007809662,0.000042016156,0.0002167478,0.000032474316,0.054803297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99449027,0.00054459454,0.00007343876,0.00029053824,0.0029983253,0.0016029078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973533,0.0005006785,0.00014035562,0.000050931554,0.0014422297,0.00051254686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002732848,0.00037950824,0.0003592971,0.0035948919,0.021362592,0.0119264675,0.0026966673,0.0052023525,0.004661566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008059254,0.00030407126,0.00042227295,0.005034976,0.023887867,0.0030521774,0.0022725773,0.004818477,0.00030765508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034497913,0.000030809668,0.0048938184,0.00033586335,0.000022945855,0.00039565546,0.017178666,0.00030012857,0.00023230277,0.63427556,0.290329,0.05197082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045699526,0.00002632128,0.05310372,0.0018317095,0.00011671141,0.00022752435,0.04248775,0.00039417425,0.0003169775,0.07599638,0.8253034,0.00014962493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9923658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99767214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12736677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12736677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23400198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9241149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599777945","doi":"","title":"Searching for a Legal Regime for Alberta’s Glaciers: An Analysis of Ambiguous Legislation and Impractical Common Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.038978869666383295,"score_gpt":0.393803640263812,"score_spread":0.3548247705974287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599777945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3981008,0.016928483,0.0126343295,0.09918062,0.00038730958,0.00035165934,0.00047363198,0.000098435914,0.4718447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669753,0.0048706383,0.0046768226,0.007009342,0.00015228141,0.0000651818,0.00016623722,0.000039066268,0.016045257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98964065,0.0011540117,0.00031165004,0.0008358055,0.005166457,0.0028913287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796141,0.012487903,0.001531544,0.00079683634,0.0047747376,0.00079479255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009875075,0.00034662997,0.0006178395,0.007061645,0.014772057,0.017312268,0.0055002994,0.008767175,0.006577758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029253397,0.0005379569,0.0009885795,0.007357665,0.025553973,0.0054061953,0.003730345,0.0072988556,0.00026288567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019385496,0.000055498946,0.011394082,0.00015718964,0.000027309867,0.00043970658,0.0056340354,0.0012870948,0.00019441028,0.95350367,0.008611237,0.018676408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007272693,0.00005458243,0.09251298,0.0022136085,0.00035962154,0.00043558824,0.0609248,0.009617375,0.001022977,0.626401,0.20618924,0.0001955388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8268656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9251259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17313439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06332993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13285914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45949292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613187403","doi":"","title":"Tidal Energy Law in Canada: Hindering an Untapped Potential for International Primacy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.010920610589556427,"score_gpt":0.2638590853796762,"score_spread":0.25293847479011977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613187403","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027696036,0.03163347,0.0020761776,0.5342389,0.0026354261,0.00010417806,0.0005781434,0.00013784514,0.40089986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5294626,0.041528184,0.0042308406,0.29771438,0.0019923297,0.000134202,0.0004812953,0.00023725013,0.12421887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98284656,0.00093633897,0.0005084372,0.0013348144,0.010291541,0.0040823277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748409,0.0057352735,0.0008235069,0.00082662556,0.015352905,0.0024209074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009701213,0.0005216087,0.0009852124,0.004865496,0.0252771,0.028653385,0.0065093953,0.016184412,0.008781989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028906303,0.00073793856,0.0012775846,0.007303289,0.023963317,0.0067441757,0.0060719224,0.017870752,0.00072693045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016529648,0.000042888423,0.0025764364,0.00023013083,0.0000356598,0.0002653343,0.0044843284,0.0004133523,0.00020713959,0.8360407,0.12732951,0.028358065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038862418,0.000022466307,0.008755631,0.0020655417,0.00013398835,0.00013501567,0.013751401,0.0007418819,0.0004699338,0.08376456,0.8899796,0.00014116621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9879176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99418515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14308222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14308222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.45307112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99390316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614061493","doi":"","title":"Reconciling Crown and Indigenous Legal Orders: The Reciprocal Benefits of Reserving an Indigenous Seat on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Supreme court; Reciprocal; Law; Political science; Crown (dentistry); Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06001522478871164,"score_gpt":0.3408741564477494,"score_spread":0.28085893165903775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614061493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15508917,0.13320388,0.0032185137,0.19989268,0.0016032177,0.000109766064,0.00026281673,0.00006506067,0.5065549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282681,0.032147143,0.001233224,0.021958433,0.00063806435,0.00002949465,0.00005326066,0.000028685674,0.015643593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857307,0.0016955216,0.0003134665,0.0011303563,0.0070292163,0.0041006254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98563033,0.006606854,0.0007432547,0.00043541408,0.005442279,0.0011418259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009007893,0.00031488194,0.0008604127,0.0032827866,0.01818835,0.015638106,0.005519326,0.007956152,0.005063718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02811717,0.00044235785,0.00047970426,0.0051350393,0.026858326,0.0046995515,0.0048428397,0.008722703,0.00024035829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038738825,0.00005321542,0.0070219585,0.00058182137,0.00010143433,0.0005506192,0.017238993,0.0010721084,0.00026876156,0.86507756,0.032316603,0.07567822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000826411,0.00005376149,0.051955707,0.00550155,0.00066186435,0.00048283197,0.0605251,0.0024794992,0.0010579857,0.27348295,0.6034448,0.0002711949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96347725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9896561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90983295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09016704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26652572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6542107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626402653","doi":"","title":"A New Hope, or a Charter Menace? The New Labour Trilogy’s Implications for Labour Law in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Charter; Labour law; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.04037535000910514,"score_gpt":0.3568823761013547,"score_spread":0.31650702609224957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626402653","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062868483,0.08639983,0.0008435323,0.8507043,0.0048985817,0.000045596615,0.0003133563,0.00003992474,0.05046802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27902007,0.14089008,0.004170285,0.5007207,0.0065465975,0.00012225522,0.00040453396,0.00016728789,0.06795822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852985,0.0013651968,0.0005029689,0.0012477932,0.008197409,0.0033881294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97226477,0.008820577,0.0009903989,0.00055969926,0.013509362,0.003855303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014564232,0.0005417712,0.0014915116,0.0046647927,0.023253929,0.022581253,0.006210376,0.0134720085,0.01028369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037571166,0.0007512169,0.0010162591,0.007743301,0.030871345,0.008274919,0.004787968,0.020520847,0.00066632975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004001517,0.00006820422,0.0028011198,0.0007725408,0.000051284143,0.00028469833,0.0064042285,0.00056491676,0.00018293959,0.5765769,0.34448123,0.06777195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006384891,0.000027059186,0.00845692,0.00255419,0.000070113005,0.000085446525,0.010770389,0.0006349202,0.0001341445,0.058781326,0.9182651,0.00015656662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99082184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18107624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18107624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4752972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9498355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802181875","doi":"","title":"Cruel, Unusual, and Constitutionally Infirm: Mandatory Minimum Sentences in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology; Criminology","score_opus":0.03243567578332732,"score_gpt":0.32246164776872843,"score_spread":0.29002597198540114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802181875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27708608,0.050243907,0.002552183,0.31986523,0.0017143864,0.00029671742,0.002149506,0.00017770265,0.3459144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91085696,0.015849723,0.0018302568,0.043881837,0.0006769142,0.00012307154,0.00033081626,0.000084080115,0.026366338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97982496,0.0018109368,0.0008690942,0.0018119847,0.009468938,0.00621396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96031207,0.017519463,0.0020924122,0.0009832309,0.0149084525,0.004184342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01236247,0.00048176316,0.0013296638,0.0037815464,0.0231034,0.014106557,0.007555071,0.00966739,0.008121228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06114361,0.001132925,0.0007881544,0.0062533994,0.01501575,0.0036395905,0.004592771,0.014640035,0.0003909434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016906406,0.0002120674,0.0281874,0.00091071945,0.00014341687,0.0009860682,0.019816024,0.0015465133,0.0007401399,0.6852966,0.16770835,0.09428369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031021994,0.00017453983,0.24137725,0.0059781694,0.0009091774,0.00059249526,0.03641692,0.00433103,0.0017086237,0.1195925,0.5877901,0.00081901235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99368393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99827254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15766118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15766118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40821454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9769936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803927068","doi":"","title":"No Matter How Small: Child Witnesses in Canadian Criminal Trials","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Criminal trial; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.056383443349039296,"score_gpt":0.3616044967243237,"score_spread":0.30522105337528443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803927068","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101978466,0.37298635,0.0021422722,0.39739004,0.005184712,0.0005114788,0.0017452439,0.00006179139,0.11799968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73555887,0.19288649,0.0021915352,0.05398642,0.002559706,0.00034865193,0.00066287274,0.00008314497,0.011722347],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.971329,0.0061485493,0.0020665051,0.0021822334,0.012945618,0.0053280746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8885702,0.05338453,0.010602446,0.0019646194,0.03458253,0.010895698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03164804,0.0005620972,0.0014934372,0.0075675086,0.013186611,0.013235938,0.0062314006,0.0078078425,0.0060292482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25435826,0.00084171025,0.00083683035,0.012033338,0.011796962,0.0057470254,0.004656111,0.009702848,0.00044074195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033215602,0.00019449131,0.09692763,0.006019994,0.0004425063,0.0015616188,0.038145203,0.0009924966,0.00031499437,0.12995934,0.23672251,0.48838705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022097118,0.00014226916,0.3890612,0.0321309,0.0014099639,0.000906607,0.05538523,0.00093939976,0.000494289,0.045940842,0.47296444,0.00040384877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9755611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99389184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09358339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09358339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34554613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67899823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28535252","doi":"10.1093/nar/gkx458","title":"Raising the Roof on Community Housing for People with Disabilities: Class Actions in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases","keywords":"Raising (metalworking); Class (philosophy); Public housing; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Engineering; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06273278646861234,"score_gpt":0.27739893193413334,"score_spread":0.21466614546552099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28535252","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2653581,0.12774459,0.0015198897,0.30492002,0.0035934949,0.0003617811,0.0033119116,0.00014022914,0.29305008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8147262,0.06495068,0.0013349405,0.019939553,0.00035132765,0.00010950192,0.00068133016,0.00004380935,0.0978627],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825555,0.00010937842,0.000042494405,0.000106785286,0.00066153007,0.0008243209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973869,0.00026578087,0.00016639772,0.00006652815,0.0010839015,0.0010305035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015404322,0.000258993,0.00032895914,0.001231986,0.007717008,0.0034279798,0.0024142312,0.00222317,0.0078010187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034973843,0.00019880573,0.00024951118,0.0028471437,0.0046808426,0.000959134,0.0019858747,0.0022482772,0.000312707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010468,0.0001970792,0.03273418,0.0008321597,0.000048647446,0.0015424421,0.013277641,0.0015104341,0.0007460456,0.32694736,0.2704068,0.3516525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005360491,0.00005889695,0.17944472,0.0015134559,0.0000490318,0.00026959548,0.018073611,0.00084481796,0.0004444425,0.0073668985,0.7917837,0.00009724272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9935707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99780446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08938759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08938759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16098996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6485554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894080604","doi":"","title":"Episode 4 - No Matter How Small: Child Witnesses in Canadian Criminal Courts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Appeal; Law; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Political science; Criminal law; Psychology; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.027770081339990572,"score_gpt":0.3103809470827816,"score_spread":0.282610865742791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894080604","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0930086,0.10195508,0.002096255,0.5465638,0.009328448,0.0008534363,0.0027577125,0.00011921972,0.24331746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5499286,0.1035085,0.0025107726,0.2409664,0.003430481,0.00060487754,0.0015872862,0.00015756596,0.09730541],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945692,0.000999126,0.00023873172,0.0004245862,0.002206812,0.0015615232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993248,0.0020104563,0.0005771172,0.0002740573,0.002321523,0.0015687984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005035691,0.0004767283,0.0006061433,0.0021029026,0.02064864,0.0055722627,0.002351286,0.0065072863,0.008385214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019025965,0.0005503962,0.000608131,0.004444437,0.006461046,0.004321447,0.004990557,0.011257021,0.000727359],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006391134,0.00007039896,0.008082002,0.0010002269,0.00005118376,0.0049199406,0.16038947,0.00015148205,0.00037298625,0.10672262,0.65905917,0.059116688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014437705,0.000019915162,0.017147252,0.0022023271,0.00004296386,0.001728086,0.1071241,0.000049018046,0.00018152797,0.004749941,0.8666707,0.00006970757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95019734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9815486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07173028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07173028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08162148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.520442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901806227","doi":"","title":"Episode 5 – The Stories We Tell: Site-C, Treaty 8, and the Duty to Consult and Accommodate","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Appeal; Duty; Indigenous; Law; Context (archaeology); Piano; Common law; Political science; History; Art history; Archaeology","score_opus":0.031235272530211904,"score_gpt":0.3566375705211476,"score_spread":0.3254022979909357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901806227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21606651,0.0115692485,0.0027536156,0.29553965,0.004631783,0.00038869548,0.000877897,0.0001280552,0.4680446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8294428,0.006536094,0.00089284964,0.04076069,0.0009478736,0.0004404328,0.00039024834,0.00016839108,0.12042053],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99479866,0.0025632456,0.00013474547,0.00023915965,0.000829931,0.0014343464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969879,0.0015902423,0.00032103702,0.00013428288,0.0003607434,0.000605878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024502117,0.00039242033,0.00051040895,0.0008757614,0.024573635,0.007861797,0.0014745438,0.0069092643,0.010520937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012841719,0.0004547403,0.00033337856,0.001636257,0.011900575,0.0075512994,0.008501293,0.013841279,0.0014481347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028845194,0.000034204568,0.0007705891,0.00015028052,0.0000046373034,0.0030857506,0.77553546,0.00004194666,0.00016608048,0.08732323,0.12591201,0.0069469367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042944034,0.000008541419,0.0007739476,0.00030848006,0.000002733722,0.0007588504,0.53270423,0.000016857857,0.0001107176,0.0038168752,0.46148357,0.00001089098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091511115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13829564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90848887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011452887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073012183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18195695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902106734","doi":"","title":"A Minor Issue? The Shortcomings of the Eligibility Requirements for Medically Assisted Death in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minor (academic); Medicine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13949187705658206,"score_gpt":0.4485535989586108,"score_spread":0.30906172190202874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902106734","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03555365,0.03270174,0.0017424688,0.7272193,0.004053135,0.00033701636,0.0012734893,0.00015205047,0.19696721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44865966,0.031729806,0.0043083034,0.45067134,0.00448773,0.00036605244,0.00072522636,0.00025929965,0.058792632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9574075,0.0039613345,0.002692843,0.0032969278,0.021793025,0.010848463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8830523,0.05092819,0.0036954775,0.002227648,0.0502601,0.009836325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031118102,0.0005750892,0.0019260792,0.0045082388,0.022364084,0.018404277,0.011606072,0.025020178,0.0085294265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11433319,0.0016215282,0.0016113151,0.005842126,0.016227547,0.0050340234,0.0056066564,0.026196916,0.00076904957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010251076,0.00013534712,0.007914003,0.0008606473,0.000098231605,0.00094375346,0.008976883,0.001105113,0.0004696282,0.59347135,0.33353993,0.0523826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028871908,0.000107474545,0.050363917,0.006345469,0.0004665668,0.00044783665,0.011584123,0.0024844133,0.0007496385,0.06856735,0.85793394,0.00066047686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98954237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15764931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15764931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44061518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9770074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943917422","doi":"","title":"The Ship is Not the Only Vessel on the River: Revisiting First Nations' Mobility Rights under Article III of the 1794 Jay Treaty","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Damages; Tort; Harm; Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Treaty; Causation; Liability; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.025309398463645782,"score_gpt":0.30756244866963506,"score_spread":0.2822530502059893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943917422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02804261,0.083227605,0.005140979,0.20816948,0.0035060635,0.00011437238,0.0001397115,0.000058561393,0.67160064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6079156,0.06704641,0.005141055,0.16396788,0.0028707173,0.0003009832,0.00017024437,0.00008808592,0.1524991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99398005,0.002351669,0.0002787018,0.00061040913,0.0016619929,0.001117284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679416,0.0020628076,0.0003147805,0.00018817568,0.0004945868,0.00014549843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0090424195,0.0003294101,0.00043636723,0.001445857,0.0062067164,0.0064600576,0.0021121115,0.010319963,0.003856818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0110041695,0.00033169895,0.0006560092,0.0012448248,0.02080961,0.005409529,0.0039812564,0.009370508,0.00078727945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054098305,0.000007997049,0.00028484024,0.00009684124,0.0000036000963,0.00021479167,0.004375601,0.00014927259,0.00009867727,0.9621464,0.020948382,0.011668135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018406556,0.00004032103,0.0021545626,0.0020251374,0.000022833454,0.00030254936,0.005796544,0.00021483835,0.0004361317,0.12535387,0.86358255,0.00005222534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11169696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1548741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88830304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010545214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025046779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22209364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946611223","doi":"","title":"Promoting the Long-Term Management of Public Corporations Through a Reform of Canadian Corporate Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Prosperity; Term (time); Corporation; Corporate law; Business; Duty of loyalty; Compensation (psychology); Duty; Corporate governance; Divestment; Welfare; Economics; Finance; Law and economics; Accounting; Market economy; Law; Political science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.06150179575214438,"score_gpt":0.26798170359021434,"score_spread":0.20647990783806996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946611223","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021791475,0.057263736,0.010668602,0.5054816,0.0030604724,0.00034684228,0.00014700009,0.00026772977,0.40097255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6434548,0.0481892,0.013266939,0.12887599,0.0018316836,0.0001638414,0.00015207544,0.000092913026,0.16397266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889837,0.0014933355,0.00038082612,0.0008833648,0.0058247726,0.0024340479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881803,0.0026970948,0.0010569054,0.0007254907,0.005765224,0.0015749668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009934922,0.0003245497,0.00032193123,0.0030974091,0.009434088,0.010252598,0.0025928284,0.0061188736,0.0032818005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016877797,0.00049853325,0.00049624447,0.0022288044,0.017770998,0.0044930787,0.003220555,0.006018217,0.0004069211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065029753,0.000051766325,0.0012059984,0.0002354932,0.0000087893495,0.00015914206,0.0034278128,0.00056720775,0.00050453644,0.88465405,0.05322418,0.055954512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027531501,0.000034396267,0.009512161,0.00070195127,0.000023776092,0.00010081694,0.002026336,0.0007487722,0.00041473933,0.045459446,0.94087064,0.00007956497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92274433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95594907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077255666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07517206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19377074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54541403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947343900","doi":"","title":"(You're) Having My Baby: Surrogacy Fees as a Cost of Future Care Award in Canadian Tort Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Tort; Damages; Law; Harm; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.019739883197349095,"score_gpt":0.33989398540305477,"score_spread":0.32015410220570567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947343900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020724092,0.119738184,0.0029435945,0.44060332,0.0037659525,0.00017480599,0.00027731023,0.00006308196,0.41170964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.570796,0.13400331,0.0048341705,0.20438336,0.002395208,0.00018826163,0.00022940573,0.000096036776,0.08307422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881861,0.0019137686,0.00033922552,0.00077029056,0.006865378,0.0019252573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98956525,0.005678474,0.00040819793,0.00027384696,0.0032671457,0.0008070758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010230436,0.00045144145,0.00050311326,0.0041805147,0.016221657,0.010064804,0.002536163,0.010476206,0.006013728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025576055,0.0005582067,0.00067833974,0.004934418,0.023980098,0.004155184,0.0027980423,0.010489126,0.00039464276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000112761145,0.000019586532,0.0011481843,0.00014295259,0.000008293587,0.00029920504,0.0030611083,0.0002771359,0.00008792611,0.88227427,0.07802739,0.034642734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046722875,0.00004194359,0.011836873,0.002667282,0.00005875997,0.00041724145,0.005050127,0.0010233902,0.00020060534,0.08981692,0.8886593,0.00018082818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9588909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9775398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10531227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10531227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13573435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7640976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948860978","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Settlement Trusts: Recharacterizing the Nature of Taxation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Revenue; Business; Government (linguistics); Tax avoidance; Tax reform; Ad valorem tax; Public economics; Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Double taxation; Payment","score_opus":0.02072167989923257,"score_gpt":0.3388506069123572,"score_spread":0.3181289270131246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948860978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051431812,0.056154657,0.012543136,0.09317574,0.0018906317,0.00012850693,0.000058148096,0.00004634463,0.784571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8891888,0.037902635,0.0026842507,0.01570507,0.0012462084,0.000102739185,0.000040065803,0.000025765437,0.05310449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949955,0.001414506,0.00021653438,0.0005471112,0.0020024905,0.0008237492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766266,0.00095225184,0.0003197288,0.00025863235,0.0006522492,0.00015457081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042433315,0.00016790887,0.00028974036,0.0018210608,0.005596497,0.007640854,0.0016989876,0.0043946705,0.0021387606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007812014,0.0003203383,0.00046081186,0.0017335082,0.026273692,0.007642296,0.0031024625,0.006218522,0.00034041962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.1710507e-7,0.0000044663684,0.00015528953,0.00002239504,0.0000011589956,0.000055917717,0.0011196868,0.00009019083,0.000023517925,0.99270695,0.001643098,0.004176254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010434398,0.00002973402,0.0034053377,0.0012323034,0.00002409671,0.00028811957,0.0054031573,0.0011122152,0.00028844044,0.4953207,0.4928441,0.000041267587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122663654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1181941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8773363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015911385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02188653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24389935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952494044","doi":"","title":"Expanding the Constitutional Right to State-Funded Legal Counsel to Address the British Columbia Housing Crisis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Law; Charter; Political science; Constitutional right; State (computer science); Right to counsel; Supreme court; Public administration; Economic Justice; Fair Housing Act; Civil rights","score_opus":0.022337275482845313,"score_gpt":0.3297768709251076,"score_spread":0.3074395954422623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952494044","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028031372,0.3692771,0.0014637533,0.23760523,0.0017672172,0.00019691496,0.00017874697,0.00008274455,0.3613969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4660111,0.37652823,0.0034743256,0.09151552,0.0011409112,0.00023637571,0.00016501322,0.000052957763,0.060875636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957782,0.0008179669,0.0001772884,0.00033715085,0.0015180154,0.0013713464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99197817,0.003630403,0.00039224603,0.0002727699,0.002952229,0.00077426183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006040017,0.00029198182,0.00042709737,0.005488621,0.009995651,0.008263735,0.0024728538,0.0072302814,0.0049028364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011861697,0.0005054852,0.000321988,0.0048215347,0.016422624,0.0033104082,0.0027098402,0.0071151876,0.0005964413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017083203,0.000104187726,0.0018450536,0.0013809104,0.000014744937,0.00086308667,0.01131914,0.0007600264,0.00064154266,0.7028745,0.091262795,0.18891697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022976874,0.000027136704,0.0077926493,0.005380088,0.000033492295,0.00020440119,0.005995194,0.0002942005,0.00032355558,0.02010435,0.95975685,0.000065116634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89713204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9469628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10286796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060037248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15322459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43560278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966633239","doi":"","title":"Historical Infringements of Aboriginal Rights: Sui Generis as a Tool to Ignore the Past","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Supreme court; Law; Statutory law; Indigenous; Economic Justice; Political science; High Court; Faith; Human rights; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02444947449560265,"score_gpt":0.3442519138024815,"score_spread":0.31980243930687885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966633239","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044121775,0.84764445,0.0005258751,0.09426198,0.0011166908,0.00001808036,0.000018842604,0.000008998956,0.05199294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15154293,0.80743843,0.0012949405,0.029720807,0.0015850216,0.00003606262,0.000040024646,0.000015831467,0.00832587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994331,0.0019358606,0.00024854275,0.0004042013,0.0023668848,0.0007135288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994261,0.003011026,0.0004514771,0.00024468813,0.0016510094,0.0003807925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009853917,0.00032532448,0.00079193595,0.00494819,0.006011326,0.0087692505,0.0021977487,0.0048805326,0.001674881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009068384,0.00033428942,0.00054391276,0.004183402,0.040446956,0.0057208,0.0025959266,0.007651082,0.00023063092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011221623,0.000041179952,0.0010859726,0.001928976,0.000031026917,0.0005116819,0.019307936,0.00018957017,0.00025403677,0.80187213,0.027210698,0.14755549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012522179,0.00004478915,0.0058553945,0.007961863,0.00006209551,0.00056175207,0.013543533,0.00011572626,0.0002112352,0.06407858,0.90750355,0.000049005084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5138247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67980796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4861753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03829176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.070665754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.978077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037129253","doi":"","title":"A Rose by Any Other Name","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Downtown; Framing (construction); Context (archaeology); Indigenous; Rhetoric; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Law; Public relations; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.06791956872920206,"score_gpt":0.3943072814495496,"score_spread":0.3263877127203475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037129253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00086695503,0.10704889,0.0010132735,0.039975066,0.012808856,0.00006186333,0.0006116555,0.0004691475,0.8371443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015933359,0.078662425,0.0011916241,0.023717636,0.0023913465,0.000043567077,0.0005697415,0.00040726285,0.8770831],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988457,0.0002562625,0.000053901455,0.00019031684,0.00048600708,0.00016767139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983518,0.00034211678,0.000099124205,0.00022705014,0.00070764567,0.00027219814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090411893,0.00051032746,0.0004604343,0.0010511326,0.0033919574,0.0058057127,0.0014068118,0.0024821481,0.24475944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004698236,0.00022254851,0.0004933061,0.0016566694,0.002409203,0.004106642,0.0036667886,0.002905207,0.1309404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021142474,0.000015218799,0.00019753815,0.00069842464,0.0000063192197,0.00021460136,0.0010955902,0.000023139026,0.00024232628,0.03129196,0.72275454,0.24343918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.7751043e-7,0.000001693307,0.00007095158,0.00015078465,9.930023e-7,0.000043386193,0.00013114621,0.0000020764032,0.000014657783,0.000269669,0.9993125,0.0000014975309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06605757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12664974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24475944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029376212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043468084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8188019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037211946","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Sacred Sites & Lands:","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Religious Tourism and Spaces","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spiritualities; Indigenous; Colonialism; Land rights; Christianity; Charter; State (computer science); Political science; Geography; Traditional knowledge; Ethnology; Environmental ethics; Law; History; Archaeology; Spirituality; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03506475635161838,"score_gpt":0.3304313490616695,"score_spread":0.2953665927100511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037211946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018284494,0.11261382,0.0011608839,0.03834386,0.00087366597,0.000095183976,0.00043283642,0.00009228584,0.82810307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46842712,0.15286466,0.003670735,0.020527946,0.0004621249,0.00007553467,0.0005468565,0.000060016522,0.35336497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877566,0.00009636509,0.000032285094,0.000082758525,0.0007118026,0.00030123355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951935,0.00006726139,0.00004580201,0.00003542841,0.00022350354,0.00010863219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006618482,0.00023467043,0.0001905828,0.0017918164,0.006373791,0.005901788,0.001169927,0.0019142558,0.00775141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001212074,0.00015476381,0.00016456727,0.0027788547,0.015065572,0.0020056225,0.0024062365,0.0017210959,0.00089424406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010240359,0.000033957676,0.0029148294,0.00065741345,0.0000089061805,0.0005209103,0.021193564,0.0003344604,0.0005356332,0.64781225,0.118624546,0.20735331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022746246,0.0000052777673,0.008488741,0.00058995304,0.0000069112584,0.00015784621,0.00878924,0.000040981973,0.000109497254,0.0076705953,0.97412676,0.000011891387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94575363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97881395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94575363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02512854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062898256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18232119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037302220","doi":"","title":"Social Science Evidence in Poverty-Related Charter Claims:","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Poverty; Legitimacy; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Scientific evidence; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.11936704409769806,"score_gpt":0.4390345066585063,"score_spread":0.31966746256080825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037302220","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011406844,0.17513649,0.013018219,0.63638145,0.0042766696,0.00020188198,0.0002433504,0.000056624143,0.15927848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5028614,0.23823044,0.026561739,0.21157888,0.007292211,0.00042551887,0.00035625164,0.00007699234,0.012616582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9521088,0.020370865,0.0032256434,0.003054348,0.019484274,0.0017560364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64235175,0.3233444,0.010061894,0.0053999536,0.01711788,0.0017241274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07034247,0.0005919303,0.001274773,0.0148524055,0.008190915,0.013781832,0.0033103814,0.017664254,0.0047436277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15433499,0.00080561487,0.0015606461,0.007482026,0.051826928,0.024805097,0.008525475,0.020671602,0.00052961346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014232689,0.000053266038,0.001749585,0.0019418554,0.00006219786,0.0006391586,0.0037198577,0.00025119557,0.00022419658,0.9262737,0.017414909,0.047655873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045906774,0.00006979902,0.004504527,0.019958954,0.00010965021,0.00044754075,0.005809902,0.0005376192,0.00077876355,0.5842627,0.383357,0.00011760902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029651934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05167438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07034247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012538614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030557038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.372011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037651573","doi":"","title":"Fundamental Rights for All","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law and economics; Law; Fundamental rights; Political science; Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.07255290217692785,"score_gpt":0.3769380089216255,"score_spread":0.30438510674469765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037651573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013050727,0.004885843,0.0045330175,0.023156969,0.0014673383,0.00013312831,0.000797276,0.00015143822,0.96357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16558465,0.015127542,0.013571267,0.066568285,0.002456531,0.0009851087,0.0034334783,0.00033607762,0.73193705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99037105,0.0016431547,0.0004947148,0.0019522475,0.0031495374,0.002389388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954613,0.0007420525,0.00029515472,0.0014322915,0.0016418915,0.00042738512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005878424,0.00074796274,0.00096567447,0.0011503975,0.00842368,0.008952442,0.0023308375,0.0069244625,0.057473876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00951305,0.0004624969,0.0009869701,0.0014714621,0.017135695,0.0057024267,0.0062088016,0.008702112,0.022260921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065590693,0.0000065449917,0.000120096855,0.00006841457,0.000008404304,0.00003770311,0.0009379945,0.000047451616,0.00012921524,0.9289718,0.053035416,0.01663046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007683128,0.0000072965913,0.00043109976,0.00020723835,0.0000068132913,0.000075636046,0.00029802645,0.000023438777,0.00007477796,0.053230546,0.9456222,0.00001519747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15105383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1407886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15105383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008587572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032763943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30034924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037701917","doi":"","title":"The Price of God","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Conviction; Damages; Plaintiff; Law; Jurisprudence; Duty; Multiculturalism; Political science; Charter; Duty to warn; Sociology","score_opus":0.05064240720482203,"score_gpt":0.3521020444818382,"score_spread":0.30145963727701613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037701917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007966005,0.059822418,0.0010461101,0.19091307,0.0049199895,0.000025897793,0.00014415346,0.000050432216,0.7351119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48908523,0.056544412,0.0015088816,0.08478047,0.0025501128,0.000036444675,0.00016483579,0.00010869284,0.3652209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984792,0.00038430275,0.000035958306,0.00016284689,0.0006864033,0.00025129877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987841,0.00034072986,0.00008353688,0.00014134131,0.0004163813,0.00023386619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011055782,0.00027471883,0.00033561816,0.00069043064,0.00642206,0.005146706,0.0006888378,0.00216549,0.020042852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004443928,0.00015678848,0.00019594577,0.0007067908,0.015825445,0.004378173,0.002548806,0.0047024568,0.00246422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015737736,0.0000070391966,0.00032402718,0.00010651077,0.0000061145242,0.0001299187,0.0050199907,0.000042228254,0.00007824591,0.77620053,0.17620465,0.041865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037363766,0.0000069613575,0.0005431245,0.00022422976,0.0000027460812,0.00011469871,0.0024132722,0.000021340999,0.00003528546,0.020503988,0.97612584,0.0000048445545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18143769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27649897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18143769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0092635825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009445596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3607632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037804025","doi":"","title":"From Ringing to Impinging","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Business; Labour economics; Public relations; Labour law; Political science; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.03269678554362195,"score_gpt":0.31773921052790244,"score_spread":0.2850424249842805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037804025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014896528,0.07441308,0.009507059,0.22683784,0.004090581,0.00008767864,0.00017880849,0.00022470001,0.6697638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4880932,0.10896537,0.004957355,0.19024831,0.002091942,0.00012678767,0.00021523851,0.00026183596,0.20503992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919258,0.0016203322,0.00026255363,0.0011017539,0.0039303023,0.0011594213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994948,0.0017876631,0.00028754646,0.0007256622,0.0017995598,0.00045160166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004783512,0.0003364708,0.0004166994,0.0017672832,0.011057545,0.015800696,0.0023477853,0.005626323,0.008101567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009413199,0.00032428713,0.00047477146,0.001801822,0.058756374,0.009289492,0.005538468,0.008622735,0.0021336004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011319287,0.0000135005175,0.00047489503,0.00021924969,0.0000050945246,0.00011612325,0.00849678,0.00012189337,0.00023557036,0.8805041,0.05383948,0.055962007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005792714,0.000012606586,0.0008217059,0.0011027548,0.000009860281,0.00010740746,0.008322162,0.00007456021,0.0002641111,0.058319643,0.93094134,0.000018117129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35530218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37870544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35530218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020722121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04386848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7064682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153894299","doi":"","title":"Seeing Justice Done: Increasing Indigenous Representation on Canadian Juries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jury; Law; Duty; Supreme court; Jury selection; Economic Justice; Political science; Representation (politics); Subject (documents); Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03169880517529474,"score_gpt":0.3514218947023078,"score_spread":0.31972308952701306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153894299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5218254,0.0559763,0.002525815,0.16496669,0.0024418654,0.0003983804,0.0007989304,0.00010015448,0.25096652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9299711,0.033231135,0.0018210872,0.015842704,0.00046783398,0.0001160077,0.0002649357,0.000026368029,0.0182588],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945056,0.001113092,0.00014304333,0.00037040026,0.002521162,0.0013466666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99225813,0.0016187988,0.00045224524,0.0001968003,0.0042145834,0.0012594336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008928755,0.0002136554,0.00036416764,0.0035539728,0.013708174,0.0049069095,0.0025659695,0.0017414131,0.0059970114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0234788,0.00021006608,0.0003056606,0.0028477341,0.0059988964,0.0015254093,0.003985884,0.0021615482,0.00042450585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019778348,0.00016461583,0.05482224,0.001558671,0.00010408799,0.0010388821,0.10484609,0.00041278207,0.002234329,0.058534376,0.1431435,0.63294256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080734724,0.00019322902,0.31421787,0.0039919373,0.00022894642,0.0004900226,0.12963273,0.00056578603,0.0015172673,0.008282182,0.54055,0.0002492957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96008617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9877101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044074226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044074226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10142358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31978238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154429129","doi":"","title":"A Gendered Approach to “Quality of Life” after Separation under the British Columbia Family Law Act Relocation Regime","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Guardian; Credibility; Family law; Quality (philosophy); Inclusion (mineral); Distancing; Political science; Family reunification; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Medicine; Immigration","score_opus":0.07373998263430484,"score_gpt":0.36689734390045337,"score_spread":0.29315736126614855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154429129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2816767,0.25312018,0.001955133,0.0939091,0.0012268595,0.000119804456,0.00034358643,0.00001844559,0.36763012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92662126,0.055055145,0.0005319645,0.0072002094,0.00019727142,0.00007087353,0.000092524526,0.00000627605,0.01022443],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957616,0.0018446965,0.00014289981,0.00026957522,0.0013398551,0.00064140686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969994,0.001217295,0.00039308367,0.00010453565,0.0009480546,0.0003377493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032873843,0.00013384804,0.00024756146,0.0032743504,0.0046420246,0.0050153644,0.00095257873,0.001154025,0.0017559071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071580186,0.00012349957,0.00020177994,0.0030120069,0.013667694,0.0016830573,0.0025337143,0.00235315,0.00012184441],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007098391,0.00013049005,0.076304264,0.0010740675,0.000043724493,0.0015206251,0.14624819,0.0005565837,0.00043876187,0.30163285,0.030520175,0.4414593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011402766,0.00008584703,0.46379432,0.006688198,0.00006419304,0.0007513216,0.1488676,0.00028970905,0.00031556856,0.042817187,0.33622903,0.00008561656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7175093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8880266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28249067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030738419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03230782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5683086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154565668","doi":"","title":"Drilling to the Bottom of the Orphan Well Problem: Suggestions for a Better Regulatory Framework for Preventing and Remediating Orphaned Oil Wells in British Columbia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Orphan drug; Scope (computer science); Bankruptcy; Supreme court; Political science; Engineering; Business; Law","score_opus":0.02117685140328224,"score_gpt":0.3019287645671203,"score_spread":0.2807519131638381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154565668","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045495246,0.06304925,0.01078729,0.6883702,0.001624662,0.00032427502,0.0003544132,0.0002653975,0.1897293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63561195,0.086029306,0.022013647,0.17949238,0.00061946874,0.0003071536,0.0003007942,0.000110047185,0.0755153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99332833,0.0010268423,0.00041844096,0.00064694544,0.0030364837,0.0015428804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871236,0.004104619,0.0008145594,0.000375603,0.0065994514,0.0009822679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065122675,0.00040433748,0.0006756339,0.0043263966,0.011014801,0.012188637,0.005741015,0.009665692,0.0040250868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013840675,0.0006305649,0.0005994547,0.0030355095,0.015181513,0.0043663955,0.0033745558,0.009911803,0.00030270548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022253309,0.000102630314,0.0059986007,0.0008287989,0.000030837728,0.0014450403,0.005154714,0.0031021554,0.0009887068,0.7957477,0.11839841,0.068180256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079529345,0.00005338044,0.01730671,0.006125263,0.00011373002,0.0005480778,0.01811729,0.0031670043,0.0013238481,0.105823174,0.84704435,0.00029757735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95273674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9770204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05607365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05607365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22152497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40684474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155743310","doi":"","title":"Student Suicide On-Campus: Tort Liability of Canadian Universities and Determining a Duty of Care","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Duty; Duty of care; Jurisprudence; Lagging; Liability; Political science; Law; Public relations; Medicine","score_opus":0.04501254650942251,"score_gpt":0.39868388322863135,"score_spread":0.35367133671920886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155743310","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033902634,0.6950105,0.0006844868,0.19821858,0.0016664548,0.00008024536,0.00010297087,0.000020084886,0.07031401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30855072,0.6603378,0.00095370394,0.024172759,0.00066037325,0.000028596289,0.00010628235,0.0000127940775,0.0051770206],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99212134,0.0011716748,0.00041141105,0.00043314652,0.004672037,0.0011904222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97976345,0.0053047165,0.0024019936,0.000285356,0.01039437,0.0018501362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006995887,0.00032591925,0.00055442494,0.006508597,0.009969309,0.008260868,0.0026430401,0.0041928124,0.0016947864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022825971,0.0004020567,0.0006229737,0.0066734725,0.01676185,0.0024886203,0.0030566643,0.0053730626,0.00017399299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044998087,0.00016296333,0.030039238,0.005117961,0.0000930877,0.0014954592,0.02146682,0.0011841558,0.00044148558,0.2592064,0.10592493,0.5748224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025415377,0.000111164685,0.099916615,0.021063168,0.00023766639,0.0010907248,0.041103132,0.0007846354,0.00043088847,0.022426527,0.8125526,0.00025764658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96779245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98680997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8998471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.100152925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26466915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7266637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157686655","doi":"","title":"The Challenges of Indigenous Oral History Since Mitchell v Minister of National Revenue","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Operationalization; CONTEST; Supreme court; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Colonialism; Indigenous rights; Public administration; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.047306832482976034,"score_gpt":0.30603364070403954,"score_spread":0.25872680822106353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157686655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14199159,0.1133768,0.00093555887,0.27482545,0.0024422836,0.000105843494,0.00028678816,0.000040543346,0.46599516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8869918,0.04202795,0.00096719497,0.037468627,0.0005784215,0.00003772426,0.00011249062,0.000030319898,0.03178544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98989373,0.0010121014,0.00030828136,0.0010650684,0.0050240676,0.002696861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889314,0.0049556936,0.0006475047,0.00033370574,0.004103099,0.0010285886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009331023,0.00021890916,0.0005999334,0.0030264691,0.026617225,0.012779481,0.003352781,0.004926698,0.0028058565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021223845,0.00047646865,0.00042440652,0.0038206067,0.04298019,0.0036722368,0.004505331,0.009514736,0.00022565029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026617387,0.000033974975,0.0049016643,0.00057242246,0.00002842237,0.0012180508,0.076955624,0.0002690351,0.0004162739,0.80151147,0.04384355,0.07022285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029600544,0.00003317444,0.027180122,0.0029849752,0.00009408783,0.0005577075,0.11889155,0.0001765101,0.00071505894,0.048367,0.80078423,0.00018607515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98259974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101119265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.101119265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21918207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73367506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209828805","doi":"","title":"Misspent Youth: The (Mis)application of the Youth Criminal Justice Act by the Criminal Code Review Boards of British Columbia and Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Criminology; Political science; Criminal code; Law; Economic Justice; Criminal procedure; Criminal law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06440637157402879,"score_gpt":0.33003962505944456,"score_spread":0.2656332534854158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209828805","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05313923,0.17676339,0.0011788193,0.62225705,0.01476184,0.0011135379,0.004164459,0.00034947853,0.1262723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43377763,0.12331663,0.0061727264,0.264642,0.0055881753,0.000897812,0.0034555197,0.00028822137,0.16186126],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9621704,0.0040501063,0.0033094469,0.0014406543,0.025154792,0.003874613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8743737,0.028750224,0.010592874,0.002461117,0.07274395,0.011078244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029616604,0.00045297408,0.00080865674,0.006648282,0.009102469,0.0088503705,0.0035785458,0.009139718,0.0028487782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0873581,0.0013242338,0.00061558094,0.0055724164,0.005426164,0.0019998222,0.0028276986,0.006031058,0.0007064086],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108165426,0.00006150884,0.030712094,0.0014742694,0.000111470465,0.00035691922,0.005583169,0.00023906156,0.00044926885,0.015606028,0.81711906,0.12817898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008041033,0.00006782953,0.18506573,0.0048680324,0.00027119342,0.00016787073,0.005087038,0.00041374154,0.00058671815,0.0011639278,0.8020739,0.00015355357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9702978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9927418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085316926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.085316926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3650594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6190205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W34689249","doi":"10.1007/s10554-021-02452-4","title":"Regional Self-Government, Mantario or Canada's 11th Province? An Analysis of Self-Determination for Northwestern Ontario","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Balance (ability); Diversity (politics); Political science; Power (physics); Federalism; Self-determination; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03886105341142086,"score_gpt":0.30077231983631453,"score_spread":0.26191126642489365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W34689249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974636,0.00014283917,0.000038368307,0.00026873476,0.0000052689825,0.000009374569,0.0003781392,0.0000027457631,0.0016910019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899167,0.000091278634,0.000042633186,0.000042277738,0.0000036281083,0.0000049348487,0.00017805568,0.0000024152032,0.00064318965],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994686,0.000057962912,0.00002891069,0.00006680933,0.00016336062,0.00021431813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979171,0.00012248698,0.0006599607,0.00006875092,0.0005376742,0.00069394725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036318565,0.0001799139,0.00021217688,0.0006230619,0.0018293704,0.0007415964,0.000550878,0.00019674706,0.001945116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016685597,0.00012248581,0.0003033367,0.0013848526,0.0006613444,0.00021256202,0.0007720157,0.00038761282,0.00017929122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028746192,0.000008700784,0.9970341,0.0000056261783,0.000010290604,0.00006911918,0.000785467,0.000017427068,0.000082009705,0.00006626045,0.00033402772,0.0015583426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020091109,0.000009201605,0.99758697,0.0000082216975,0.0000063686066,0.0000397552,0.0016209126,0.00008240407,0.000022401297,0.000011750582,0.00060679304,0.0000033198073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9699589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9838628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030041099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009197082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014082794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06672984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W645423192","doi":"","title":"The Constitutional Implications of the Hudson Decision: Lessons for Adapting to the Health Effects of Climate Change in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Climate Change and Health Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Harm; Greenhouse gas; Adaptation (eye); Exploit; Human systems engineering; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Action (physics); Political economy of climate change; Natural resource economics; Political science; Environmental science; Economics; Psychology; Ecology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.06605594212811472,"score_gpt":0.3668176893638865,"score_spread":0.30076174723577176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W645423192","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02709124,0.058679506,0.0012860637,0.69712144,0.003210064,0.000121855795,0.00072962017,0.00005276394,0.21170743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62667507,0.061112754,0.002286196,0.25641018,0.0022743074,0.000112592345,0.00036246947,0.00008052468,0.0506859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99145824,0.0011752015,0.00024281866,0.0006700545,0.0036308006,0.0028229079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885428,0.0045126723,0.00031115738,0.00035333395,0.0045710313,0.0017090612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008969931,0.00041269895,0.00076799205,0.0016587544,0.017254079,0.011050508,0.0054837717,0.012910108,0.005863832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026376016,0.00043361477,0.0007227995,0.003375918,0.017275315,0.0033527522,0.003136474,0.012205246,0.00028333312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005182444,0.000046843372,0.0034041863,0.00024530507,0.00004220701,0.00055870647,0.003943908,0.0017027563,0.00021583984,0.81558603,0.14051919,0.03368317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015708116,0.000049615654,0.020763103,0.001984753,0.00017905151,0.00019464424,0.008197334,0.0026397712,0.00045010154,0.23368333,0.7314268,0.00027449446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99524885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14952494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14952494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3365811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9864305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W654074908","doi":"","title":"Progress and Uncertainty: The Educational Rights of Special Needs Students in British Columbia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Disability Education and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Mathematics education; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.02651889142679273,"score_gpt":0.3683048778727229,"score_spread":0.34178598644593017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W654074908","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26413515,0.031016909,0.0005695453,0.36904272,0.0012148283,0.00016121611,0.00043431134,0.000036649144,0.33338872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86512244,0.013615106,0.0002983381,0.03908375,0.00037807066,0.000085089705,0.0001302991,0.000028341346,0.08125857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98726165,0.00193478,0.0005032391,0.0006620604,0.0040312186,0.00560706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826346,0.008200046,0.0006392707,0.0003547594,0.0051487223,0.003022601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008840988,0.00029695992,0.000875915,0.0027308292,0.02998469,0.015582821,0.004637548,0.013714784,0.0072343526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029338121,0.0005301357,0.00035692658,0.004608446,0.017512321,0.00346715,0.007919769,0.013860638,0.0005772892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000151958,0.00028638198,0.04032956,0.00079897017,0.00006080247,0.0026765047,0.12881157,0.0016644791,0.0006893178,0.46152234,0.19462532,0.16838278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008013873,0.00010185528,0.12956111,0.004816323,0.00018561931,0.0005089208,0.24434677,0.0011186448,0.00064835063,0.08112923,0.5371924,0.0003106919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96854144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98666257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056975428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056975428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20838189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4133876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W938569533","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Baker: A Critical Race Feminist Theory of Disability","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Immigration; Appeal; Supreme court; Poverty; Sociology; Political science; Critical race theory; Law; Duty; Criminology; Gender studies; Racism","score_opus":0.0759723442374994,"score_gpt":0.3736639926635501,"score_spread":0.29769164842605067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W938569533","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013578882,0.05352009,0.0113985855,0.5882469,0.0017650332,0.00009309799,0.00008706534,0.000041552772,0.33126876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7952149,0.028700119,0.006365013,0.117268026,0.001972468,0.0001952317,0.000054237673,0.000094596326,0.050135463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947978,0.0025121262,0.00008137022,0.0003747607,0.0013808085,0.0008530942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596643,0.0029536323,0.0001697134,0.00011187446,0.0005547922,0.00024353877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008847543,0.00051950564,0.00055628765,0.0038607018,0.014485311,0.010283291,0.0032348558,0.008284517,0.002544385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005618049,0.00026688163,0.00039538706,0.0023545912,0.084436454,0.010237648,0.0053244117,0.011180218,0.0002693497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018942536,0.0000041903236,0.000072934985,0.000030021254,9.840876e-7,0.000068143985,0.012327251,0.00004931979,0.000019725441,0.9758069,0.007447287,0.004171307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009906852,0.000011198936,0.0005313326,0.00095473055,0.00000769773,0.00013271652,0.025759138,0.00033945992,0.0001110069,0.64512706,0.32699353,0.000022138329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42785344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5392449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42785344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03794508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039655123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8507261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}