{"meta":{"query_hash":"a0753aaefa0e","filters":{"venue":"Aquaculture Economics & Management"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a0753aaefa0e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Aquaculture+Economics+%26+Management"},"results":[{"id":"W1966077602","doi":"10.1080/13657305.2011.549408","title":"BUYING POWER IN UK RETAIL CHAINS: A RESIDUAL SUPPLY APPROACH","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquaculture Economics & Management","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Residual; Market power; Exploit; Industrial organization; Lerner index; Index (typography); Economics; Power (physics); Microeconomics; Business; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.03301841314242912,"score_gpt":0.18126964011191657,"score_spread":0.14825122696948745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966077602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89318085,0.0004716284,0.075692594,0.00063229207,0.000026358242,0.00009463108,0.0013953666,0.00011194996,0.028394239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908042,0.00017241047,0.002717257,0.000027883922,0.000016161202,0.000025441874,0.00055763515,0.000023354569,0.005655646],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902856,0.00035607067,0.000083743194,0.00016501364,0.0001705815,0.00019610942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995793,0.0026018994,0.0005615399,0.00036187566,0.0005139865,0.00016773655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001342819,0.00035293755,0.0005816627,0.0016866953,0.0003650958,0.0017029048,0.0010214379,0.000728681,0.017420841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008377704,0.00058089924,0.00096776156,0.0013832512,0.0012477534,0.0021155463,0.0011635992,0.0009014279,0.0009161714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007617198,0.00018222269,0.12547043,0.0003280038,0.00020697607,0.0020682088,0.0019442018,0.57805836,0.003463208,0.22124386,0.0032618893,0.06301087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000823801,0.00031378382,0.08471336,0.00007838113,0.0000879971,0.00049597817,0.0019693628,0.7823626,0.00093325425,0.119322576,0.009536417,0.00010398696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02815006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022628848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02815006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002063304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047247193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0582785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973928635","doi":"10.1080/13657300903351636","title":"A SPATIAL MODEL FOR ESTIMATING CUMULATIVE EFFECTS AT AQUACULTURE SITES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquaculture Economics & Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Bay; Thematic map; Marine spatial planning; Aquaculture; Environmental science; Geographic information system; Environmental resource management; Cumulative effects; Recreation; Habitat; Fishery; Geography; Cartography; Statistics; Ecology; Mathematics; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.05087380988027662,"score_gpt":0.2361882795521618,"score_spread":0.18531446967188517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973928635","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06022007,0.0003241214,0.9314064,0.00063553825,0.00004355416,0.00013231159,0.001970114,0.00042967603,0.0048381677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8128107,0.0011581517,0.16320303,0.00022012184,0.00010396223,0.00082378305,0.003245954,0.00026512012,0.018169187],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976757,0.00095415505,0.000128682,0.00062590354,0.00036803077,0.000247542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914619,0.0061997124,0.00081562455,0.0005195864,0.00077811186,0.00022515724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006015567,0.0010447124,0.001334812,0.0026492479,0.0005870957,0.0027413773,0.0038078553,0.0020397478,0.0067785806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01672591,0.0012129453,0.0020876632,0.0043618353,0.0016404049,0.0038878913,0.0019010243,0.0019612228,0.001316112],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018353356,0.000016897427,0.0027297323,0.0000149680345,0.000037029502,0.000054563825,0.000032471646,0.97452265,0.0001186818,0.018458305,0.00027261107,0.0037236847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009995623,0.000019485986,0.00083425705,0.000008990783,0.00002073675,0.000039263537,0.00001949344,0.9857533,0.00008956478,0.01239831,0.0007943454,0.000012158729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03878988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025432784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03878988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035614988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014026953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07712817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982125237","doi":"10.1080/13657305.2014.903312","title":"DETERMINANTS OF RETAIL PRICE AND SALES VOLUME OF CATFISH PRODUCTS IN THE UNITED STATES: AN APPLICATION OF RETAIL SCANNER DATA","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquaculture Economics & Management","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture","keywords":"Retail sales; Business; Catfish; Retail trade; Volume (thermodynamics); Scanner; Commerce; Marketing; Econometrics; Economics; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Computer science","score_opus":0.02928529699582991,"score_gpt":0.218131156934506,"score_spread":0.18884585993867609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982125237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99818146,0.000029576895,0.000292199,0.000059068752,0.000002869441,0.000009461921,0.0008863166,0.000010394435,0.0005286566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99824107,0.00003033707,0.00028984286,0.0000079379415,0.0000019631846,0.0000101577225,0.001168299,0.0000024060434,0.0002480801],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995165,0.00020366616,0.000039655315,0.000108208165,0.00009662252,0.0000353833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938583,0.00385647,0.0010953265,0.00023945826,0.0007603591,0.00019012674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088566024,0.00017389398,0.00024508842,0.0006406173,0.00018609459,0.00079864735,0.0003824317,0.00030068515,0.0029700566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053193984,0.00022933914,0.0004890628,0.0016213199,0.00021418386,0.00042414144,0.00040605292,0.0005714241,0.00026495758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051804367,0.00005930649,0.9940916,0.000012468288,0.00006551702,0.000075889686,0.00007409601,0.0023466141,0.0001361343,0.00013340727,0.0004252615,0.002527897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008467125,0.00011221948,0.9702772,0.000012394496,0.00004389845,0.000078190606,0.0006359271,0.027715446,0.00019793573,0.00018834906,0.00071903766,0.000011060422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048419688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040391278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048419688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006277161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004487485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09627569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986706989","doi":"10.1080/13657300903123969","title":"SURVEY OF ETHNIC LIVE SEAFOOD MARKET OPERATORS IN THE NORTHEASTERN USA","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquaculture Economics & Management","topic":"Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agricultural Marketing Service; Massachusetts Institute of Technology","keywords":"Business; Quarter (Canadian coin); Ethnic group; Marketing; Agricultural economics; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.018956453778833666,"score_gpt":0.24637938587060018,"score_spread":0.2274229320917665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986706989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99865925,0.00003042771,0.000053626027,0.00006354399,0.000001695806,0.000015184755,0.00030116655,0.0000019848246,0.00087313843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99637455,0.00019875303,0.00039377672,0.00023100368,0.0000065383438,0.00006220398,0.00082572957,0.0000032534572,0.0019041797],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969876,0.00007243722,0.000029885487,0.00004505599,0.00010268538,0.00005115172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873286,0.00015640032,0.00045351635,0.000041856274,0.00039917318,0.00021617378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006199503,0.00013824261,0.00013951496,0.0007304557,0.00064165756,0.00033961763,0.00028881207,0.0002306472,0.0022113528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001034586,0.00020201094,0.00008574884,0.0010160747,0.00022068608,0.00048022444,0.00040022843,0.00021457938,0.000416647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021232363,0.00008899826,0.9917148,0.000014193515,0.000006883765,0.00024803943,0.0028261398,0.000016582666,0.0007294722,0.000020457575,0.00065650966,0.0036567734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017301708,0.00007905172,0.98838145,0.0000107818205,0.000004299679,0.00021640917,0.009594574,0.00010029517,0.00010519428,0.000007771648,0.0014939897,0.0000044599205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04091971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13207312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04091971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039558348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042127699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08136308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068652740","doi":"10.1080/13657300701727235","title":"ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF NETCAGE VERSUS SEA-BAG PRODUCTION SYSTEMS FOR SALMON AQUACULTURE IN BRITISH COLUMBIA","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquaculture Economics & Management","topic":"Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"InStream Fisheries Research (Canada); University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Profitability index; Aquaculture; Business; Production (economics); Environmental impact assessment; Scrutiny; Natural resource economics; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental economics; Fishery; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Economics; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Finance; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.01356356350896926,"score_gpt":0.22085108433934453,"score_spread":0.20728752083037527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068652740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99592125,0.00019720178,0.0003513645,0.00007892883,0.0000031547363,0.000055539935,0.0003598794,0.0000061650508,0.003026425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997554,0.0001671806,0.0002740014,0.000013487323,0.000001684513,0.000023083167,0.00035506653,0.000004345011,0.0016071906],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990933,0.0002445971,0.000034173347,0.00007071859,0.00029493915,0.00026228905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987643,0.0004923415,0.00015036325,0.00003829514,0.0003451839,0.00020956757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011358168,0.00048471967,0.0004002898,0.0016550764,0.00065910025,0.0016632123,0.0006886448,0.00035266447,0.0026580682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002567652,0.00032279885,0.0005010735,0.0016253609,0.0006242212,0.00059652096,0.00065952534,0.00042383745,0.00014467975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0071501923,0.0011617523,0.370159,0.0005269544,0.0005741156,0.001806044,0.0003025821,0.5076834,0.017016618,0.006800473,0.003189125,0.08362966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000156074,0.0017365662,0.7027285,0.00006303447,0.0002605617,0.00021128356,0.0014881443,0.28673,0.0023410835,0.0014931562,0.0027071284,0.00008444989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5013563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5939095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4986437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018427206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035038798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081870257","doi":"10.1080/13657305.2011.549405","title":"PREFERENCES FOR HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL ATTRIBUTES OF FARMED SALMON AMONGST SOUTHERN ONTARIO SALMON CONSUMERS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquaculture Economics & Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Flesh; Agriculture; Fish farming; Sustainability; Business; Aquaculture; Fishery; Production (economics); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Ecology; Economics","score_opus":0.0802755392572414,"score_gpt":0.206568999360216,"score_spread":0.1262934601029746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081870257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99890435,0.000022987177,0.000023519806,0.00005933966,6.4658093e-7,0.0000033826313,0.000031714168,3.5653926e-7,0.00095367385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991553,0.00005249369,0.00005692384,0.00003054198,0.0000014914636,0.000002333933,0.000043332602,6.338146e-7,0.0006568395],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981326,0.000036015826,0.000012612277,0.000022034896,0.00007844734,0.000037697286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991949,0.0001974856,0.0002598173,0.000032366297,0.00016080381,0.00015462023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005371865,0.00009841694,0.00012522761,0.0003038264,0.0005518789,0.00089472556,0.000119895696,0.00024323633,0.002962409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014992366,0.00012320599,0.00019352125,0.0005260236,0.00057465665,0.00033161198,0.00025088305,0.0002633774,0.00016212478],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003065404,0.00008264984,0.97719973,0.000032505435,0.00004551808,0.00034146264,0.009422809,0.00020703813,0.0037778742,0.0002616955,0.00034707828,0.0079750195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005759179,0.00007408588,0.99071914,0.000008595682,0.000009253624,0.000071146256,0.0081236195,0.00021657231,0.000102497026,0.00009555313,0.0005654305,0.000008388583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27055886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5496342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72944117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001577761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007243556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088672912","doi":"10.1080/13657305.2015.994234","title":"Price Determination and Demand Flexibilities in the Ex-Vessel Market for Tuna in the Republic of Maldives","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquaculture Economics & Management","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Icelandic Ministry of Fisheries and Agriculture","keywords":"Tuna; Welfare; Inverse demand function; Economics; Margin (machine learning); Price level; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Market price; Agricultural economics; Microeconomics; Fishery; Monetary economics; Demand curve; Market economy; Biology","score_opus":0.06671768554929769,"score_gpt":0.23849584069928373,"score_spread":0.17177815514998604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088672912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99906915,0.000034700468,0.00013308824,0.00011931545,7.365204e-7,0.0000014370465,0.000051182727,0.0000020318105,0.00058841245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99963343,0.000030818323,0.00004420929,0.000008401815,0.0000016802379,9.582321e-7,0.00005610911,6.757609e-7,0.0002236233],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979836,0.000060606308,0.000011053313,0.00003622687,0.000040592528,0.000053097257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998659,0.0006720647,0.0003783217,0.000065132255,0.00012062978,0.00010489907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006711857,0.0001550103,0.0002278125,0.00037132067,0.00035926042,0.00109581,0.00032505105,0.00038070534,0.0025271706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030391554,0.0002034394,0.00035618216,0.0004001483,0.00039655878,0.00071583764,0.00051312946,0.00061365694,0.00023755532],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002752221,0.00020579026,0.97272813,0.000027054475,0.00009236077,0.00085514673,0.0010160495,0.0079843635,0.002205364,0.00553576,0.0004769696,0.008597817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028624598,0.00008810954,0.94610184,0.0000137604275,0.000043239826,0.0002692033,0.0026428767,0.045970887,0.00071063405,0.0031565158,0.0009540136,0.000020306303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028222432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026375685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028222432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009053507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004362113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056116343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095291493","doi":"10.1080/13657300701370333","title":"RELEVANCE OF A RAPID APPRAISAL APPROACH TO IDENTIFY LOCALLY AVAILABLE FEED INGREDIENTS TO SMALL-SCALE NILE TILAPIA ( <i>Oreochromis niloticus</i> L.) AQUACULTURE","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquaculture Economics & Management","topic":"Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers","keywords":"Nile tilapia; Oreochromis; Aquaculture; Tilapia; Productivity; Biotechnology; Fishery; Commercial fish feed; Fish farming; Profitability index; Biology; Production (economics); Business; Food science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Economics","score_opus":0.01677882784401359,"score_gpt":0.23516480818598265,"score_spread":0.21838598034196904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095291493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52738595,0.007731265,0.40037975,0.0071296603,0.00026029642,0.009058137,0.0013228223,0.0010355986,0.04569656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58114374,0.0027568948,0.40899134,0.00044546422,0.000042666936,0.0019451649,0.00042366603,0.00006424189,0.0041867546],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970891,0.0016237478,0.00020019225,0.00017520161,0.0008288928,0.0000828777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920718,0.0043360684,0.0011635157,0.00018857441,0.001993303,0.0002466664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005683244,0.0011331302,0.0009896886,0.002646611,0.00055707217,0.0020753932,0.0007692021,0.00058730866,0.003154126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01167824,0.00027377805,0.00068656716,0.0011165837,0.0006155208,0.0014731586,0.000842481,0.0006309842,0.0005549113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025165114,0.0012327227,0.029624345,0.0047812485,0.00027547526,0.0013608907,0.0012849375,0.03832193,0.06158523,0.005283005,0.004437281,0.84929645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021711967,0.03284356,0.20496738,0.0050198156,0.0016670465,0.004501983,0.031902887,0.35131103,0.17379099,0.06690214,0.12315308,0.0017689302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005112017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007886249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005683244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020685152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036941494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030056238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129642380","doi":"10.1080/13657300903351594","title":"GOVERNING THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL DIMENSIONS OF PANGASIUS PRODUCTION IN VIETNAM: A REVIEW∗","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquaculture Economics & Management","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Pangasius; Production (economics); Business; Economics; Fishery; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.01114549415521866,"score_gpt":0.22120738483757446,"score_spread":0.2100618906823558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129642380","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036121686,0.9923307,0.00017718959,0.0003905786,0.000073835996,0.000019344754,0.000051082596,0.000004335797,0.0033407868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01527632,0.9838508,0.00020368736,0.00010393604,0.000042828382,0.000010627511,0.000056720695,0.000001631721,0.00045337973],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958247,0.000096541946,0.00009311455,0.000052215346,0.00013922513,0.000036509762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998256,0.000904907,0.00039010306,0.000028249193,0.00036174193,0.000058995414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014657513,0.00037062203,0.00075129594,0.0022066243,0.00036308783,0.0015805817,0.0005360316,0.00056181307,0.0017329521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014925573,0.00022709055,0.00026231084,0.0045901146,0.0005111829,0.0011959506,0.00034938162,0.0003154402,0.0001804143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008427398,0.00009169979,0.005344118,0.06937085,0.00019788177,0.0009161697,0.0019983074,0.0016304641,0.0020945019,0.0054649212,0.0073465444,0.9054603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021176735,0.0003596811,0.031610496,0.029116655,0.0004262017,0.0014938838,0.003606915,0.00034850583,0.0022811354,0.0014628324,0.9292254,0.00004702962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01955615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039868545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01955615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015484558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005484627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0388847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284622711","doi":"10.1080/13657305.2016.1124935","title":"A contingent valuation of the biomitigation benefits of integrated multi-trophic aquaculture in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquaculture Economics & Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Simon Fraser University; University of New Brunswick; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency","keywords":"Aquaculture; Contingent valuation; Fishery; Trophic level; Agriculture; Valuation (finance); Payment; Business; Ecosystem; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Economics; Biology; Willingness to pay; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.05102989374454479,"score_gpt":0.18907509427415245,"score_spread":0.13804520052960767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284622711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886912,0.0002132593,0.00076148036,0.00071836833,0.0000070411115,0.00003681638,0.0012074037,0.000008834396,0.008355541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777156,0.00015563899,0.00026567173,0.000028472192,0.000002592713,0.000006160868,0.00046700402,0.0000015007333,0.0013013342],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992255,0.00019404267,0.000029981333,0.00007589043,0.00021526634,0.0002593012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99449533,0.0026710222,0.0007358819,0.00018646571,0.0012518816,0.0006593965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011509308,0.00024012422,0.00035454636,0.0009188631,0.0017349711,0.0020281293,0.0007336508,0.0005050939,0.0027091485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008342071,0.00022903564,0.00033691106,0.002564036,0.0009768128,0.0008065177,0.0006920485,0.0009785831,0.00010718734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010125708,0.0004323335,0.7928664,0.00014704652,0.00026024817,0.001291861,0.0024991198,0.08383467,0.0012831695,0.06198415,0.009524636,0.044863727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012164144,0.00016124835,0.7574234,0.000115153736,0.00015786929,0.00023138522,0.006694413,0.21111356,0.000821565,0.011455826,0.011567486,0.00013641812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9767343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9785161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030432666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030432666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01648185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22080547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346925708","doi":"10.1080/13657305.2016.1155961","title":"Economic values of supply chain productivity and quality traits calculated for a farmed European whitefish breeding program","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquaculture Economics & Management","topic":"Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Fish farming; Aquaculture; Supply chain; Quality (philosophy); Biology; Affect (linguistics); Agriculture; Business; Biotechnology; Fishery; Economics; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Marketing; Economic growth","score_opus":0.02404971300813524,"score_gpt":0.2443521495561615,"score_spread":0.22030243654802625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346925708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956768,0.000051094234,0.002465627,0.000014246809,0.0000020138114,0.000010990523,0.0004602869,0.000012157606,0.0013067112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99565953,0.000032442298,0.0024215125,0.0000041489047,0.0000010151178,0.000011110215,0.0011109008,0.000006385051,0.0007528622],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996618,0.00007573352,0.000028401915,0.00006816385,0.00012563905,0.000040321895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998899,0.00046093916,0.00025391567,0.0000909643,0.00023397652,0.0000611834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007654546,0.00025256473,0.00015010411,0.0013972663,0.00014855334,0.0003495257,0.00018837939,0.00017623742,0.0009935166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019893462,0.00009111899,0.00041726427,0.0010824647,0.00018253257,0.00035803296,0.0002648775,0.0001425759,0.00013020367],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032475256,0.000113163784,0.8770337,0.000054464144,0.00026722197,0.00031152632,0.000063710504,0.06683651,0.007473748,0.00087878294,0.0003537706,0.046288677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010477102,0.00021516168,0.96297336,0.00001132901,0.000063662475,0.0001378839,0.00010584768,0.031836215,0.0033860211,0.00047404648,0.0007748522,0.000011198636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008206304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087174226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033142205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010894418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470367519","doi":"10.1080/13657305.2016.1177861","title":"Price transmission among different Atlantic salmon products in the U.S. import market","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquaculture Economics & Management","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Price elasticity of demand; Economics; Fishery; Commodity; Business; Microeconomics; Biology; Market economy","score_opus":0.011300237812470162,"score_gpt":0.1784832681433275,"score_spread":0.16718303033085732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470367519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985958,0.00003668544,0.00035195512,0.000033576664,0.0000011650928,0.0000046031123,0.00019774474,0.000006537539,0.0007718297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99888545,0.00004564337,0.00025476603,0.000009662642,9.899707e-7,0.0000027773604,0.0005169288,0.0000023263015,0.0002814785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997346,0.00006414258,0.00002439863,0.000067956156,0.000054997006,0.000053959506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998353,0.000871256,0.00040045014,0.00010213898,0.00021121105,0.00006194989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010186018,0.00027056556,0.00024578485,0.0007468997,0.0002599256,0.0010742376,0.0002563281,0.00031215866,0.0019172637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002740847,0.00024811464,0.00071096094,0.0010852097,0.00032269975,0.0008850346,0.00051380316,0.00045588068,0.00022603253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037012546,0.00017097355,0.92098767,0.000031553565,0.00020675712,0.00039749968,0.00045136738,0.050712246,0.002048025,0.0047775144,0.00076758914,0.01907874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002473397,0.00024560443,0.816882,0.000025066516,0.00013886698,0.00016474014,0.000863933,0.17702356,0.0012596173,0.0023118756,0.0010143999,0.000045569373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07139433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07319124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07139433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001713156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000633088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14195752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590840064","doi":"10.1080/13657305.2017.1284943","title":"Farmed fish to supermarket: Testing for price leadership and price transmission in the salmon supply chain","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquaculture Economics & Management","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Bivariate analysis; Producer price index; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Transmission (telecommunications); Price index; Wholesale price index; Supply chain; Economics; Reservation price; Price level; Business; Mid price; Fishery; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Monetary economics; Marketing; Biology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.04967256659762343,"score_gpt":0.23012243784552214,"score_spread":0.1804498712478987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590840064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99894637,0.000010637281,0.00057877786,0.00004481372,0.000002527793,0.000004883697,0.00003836745,0.0000052145624,0.0003685619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995377,0.0000081644275,0.00023434572,0.00000884064,0.00000621585,0.0000041860785,0.000100558784,0.0000017144966,0.00009834257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995972,0.001659657,0.00025841722,0.00063845527,0.0009850243,0.00048643426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9513374,0.025234856,0.016109666,0.0019495158,0.0026855115,0.0026830244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004206049,0.00027907148,0.00034738373,0.0009929725,0.00042282394,0.0012456907,0.00074446015,0.000495233,0.0041114753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029368738,0.00024459237,0.00058247265,0.0013290396,0.0010283799,0.0017830126,0.0012265835,0.0012827,0.00037836764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026501523,0.00022088605,0.9890647,0.000013893129,0.00015156785,0.00015804106,0.00048280144,0.0014739168,0.00074350776,0.0005556719,0.00012034302,0.006749535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046965335,0.0008480925,0.9603699,0.000011636038,0.00008371223,0.00011438352,0.0022367393,0.033137012,0.0013403692,0.0014956621,0.00029411368,0.000021528334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006466283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003319265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006466283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005911024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010401317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022243977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046843429","doi":"10.1080/13657305.2020.1793822","title":"Enhancing land-based culture of coho salmon through genomic technologies: An economic analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquaculture Economics & Management","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Broodstock; Aquaculture; Biology; Selective breeding; Fishery; Biotechnology; Oncorhynchus; Selection (genetic algorithm); Trait; Emerging technologies; Flesh; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.01000629404453841,"score_gpt":0.2294533783087138,"score_spread":0.2194470842641754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046843429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99400073,0.00017418522,0.002185451,0.000069377864,0.0000019446313,0.000027503176,0.00017358457,0.0000059473323,0.0033613443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961359,0.00020058213,0.0021881873,0.000011059722,0.0000016002542,0.00001589227,0.0002185939,0.000002251204,0.0012260065],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999783,0.000057973237,0.0000060465463,0.000018482166,0.00010663073,0.000027822787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997048,0.00011293704,0.000039222577,0.000021121594,0.000099799945,0.000022235188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048876595,0.00014539114,0.00009859213,0.00057981367,0.00025214418,0.0005915592,0.00019332724,0.000103101826,0.00096904224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006026134,0.000039723276,0.00015608428,0.00065792794,0.00027119185,0.0002635183,0.00026640878,0.00011695458,0.00008261493],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057811517,0.00041911023,0.49585885,0.00025239945,0.00011573644,0.0008098119,0.00021707393,0.052078597,0.22206007,0.006835396,0.0008665279,0.21990837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028344188,0.0011937908,0.8234205,0.000035462286,0.00014616306,0.00026437876,0.0014947027,0.100729816,0.06584814,0.0014398212,0.0053633363,0.00003557573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029596124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07738504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029596124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023204188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000837601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058847725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185595084","doi":"10.1080/13657305.2021.1946205","title":"Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic response on aquaculture farmers in five countries in the Mekong Region","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquaculture Economics & Management","topic":"Innovation and Socioeconomic Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Livelihood; Aquaculture; Business; Pandemic; Agricultural economics; Household income; Poverty; Economics; Socioeconomics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Agriculture; Fishery; Economic growth; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.025933601437219154,"score_gpt":0.2557276823481844,"score_spread":0.22979408091096523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185595084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99955255,0.000028030932,0.000012481845,0.00008032656,0.0000017222342,0.0000099345825,0.00004373514,5.9927083e-7,0.0002706005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99962044,0.00007381197,0.000038927014,0.000055802237,7.252362e-7,0.000009898675,0.000034361623,2.8938612e-7,0.00016570959],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995771,0.0001258271,0.000030571555,0.000039142426,0.0000306058,0.00019670479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999342,0.00012210164,0.00021991487,0.000021092716,0.00012446467,0.00017039597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006373482,0.00027530905,0.00012153551,0.00038666726,0.0011305263,0.00061429426,0.00022834704,0.0003879041,0.0009720103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010144197,0.00019819781,0.00016537895,0.00055389013,0.0007110599,0.00047863592,0.001144028,0.00031892981,0.000068785695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016280508,0.00007803692,0.97625005,0.00010936545,0.00003125255,0.0016982647,0.010734454,0.0005167643,0.001750166,0.00022184566,0.00035165044,0.008095321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018235733,0.0002636438,0.9267108,0.00007637823,0.00002647129,0.0003580648,0.06953708,0.00041464414,0.00045060198,0.00009258908,0.0020315626,0.000019976891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09773961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20617968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09773961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001595796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001638683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19434142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}