{"meta":{"query_hash":"40548d49253d","filters":{"venue":"Argument & Computation"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/40548d49253d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Argument+%26+Computation"},"results":[{"id":"W2002330963","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2011.637641","title":"Reasoning about knowledge using defeasible logic","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Defeasible estate; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Model-based reasoning; Descriptive knowledge; Computer science; Non-monotonic logic; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Knowledge representation and reasoning; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1088828001548048,"score_gpt":0.3128346801907785,"score_spread":0.2039518800359737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002330963","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013008193,0.0010643203,0.95650184,0.006751658,0.00016736772,0.00016796928,0.00015899978,0.00029746286,0.021882264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35160744,0.0013465987,0.63989013,0.00088980055,0.00024048534,0.00035641607,0.00043175093,0.000090817906,0.005146522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98948777,0.005862414,0.0009680693,0.00081130315,0.0024019592,0.00046855074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987575,0.008734955,0.0008704046,0.0016207659,0.0007858168,0.00041306223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012598336,0.0009239599,0.0013565853,0.0031156319,0.0036163277,0.010344391,0.0036093127,0.0035966549,0.004917816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02124836,0.0010578285,0.0026775238,0.002647573,0.009648617,0.016334403,0.007102264,0.004364644,0.0007966745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002574874,0.000017927618,0.00016391663,0.000108150576,0.00005449231,0.00027681768,0.0007424374,0.014366037,0.00021970729,0.9748292,0.00094136276,0.008254282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002284494,0.000008110205,0.000043112163,0.0000574862,0.000019582174,0.000107673826,0.00019813748,0.030065147,0.00035672946,0.95765823,0.011445118,0.000017895425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040721563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046149334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012598336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030371912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002626389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066627145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030170053","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2010.486481","title":"The structure of argumentation in health product messages","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Product (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010800036087300326,"score_gpt":0.28007552190688106,"score_spread":0.2692754858195807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030170053","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3295629,0.003926243,0.50793016,0.008846799,0.00029425306,0.0007615461,0.00039996396,0.0005258104,0.14775234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90842175,0.0005018458,0.08556307,0.0001385422,0.00006950326,0.0002623128,0.000246985,0.00008892621,0.0047070845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97726905,0.016157972,0.0013418783,0.0011582974,0.0033229755,0.0007498199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9383964,0.051094156,0.004291369,0.0023896685,0.003103919,0.0007244642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011770802,0.0006486866,0.0007037249,0.0071499012,0.0040819533,0.011394874,0.0015309782,0.0035661282,0.005663516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05911483,0.00090985274,0.0010247094,0.004010499,0.00893687,0.01600054,0.0040883417,0.0021624435,0.0008177267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000228986,0.000060809703,0.0022170085,0.00036039637,0.00004231253,0.00059616397,0.039143503,0.0046596928,0.0024163425,0.91218317,0.0010291726,0.03706244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107721535,0.00012322275,0.0033357197,0.00052452297,0.000060751274,0.00042869206,0.011334651,0.032768533,0.0027943894,0.9088886,0.039560426,0.00007282551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001724299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010502503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011770802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042049363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022561185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062250674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046052255","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2014.1001790","title":"Context-aware reconfiguration of large-scale surveillance systems: argumentative approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Control reconfiguration; Argumentative; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Scale (ratio); Political science; Embedded system; Geography","score_opus":0.031684915621979254,"score_gpt":0.27530688808844095,"score_spread":0.2436219724664617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046052255","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0357037,0.00040419982,0.9546967,0.0011115384,0.00004305174,0.00020235263,0.00005982862,0.00047924166,0.007299383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63851553,0.00032019962,0.3586774,0.00014289122,0.00006852309,0.00021760732,0.00013932075,0.00008043635,0.0018380976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961299,0.001922991,0.00027247463,0.00059005985,0.0007537892,0.00033078183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892803,0.007943436,0.00082748424,0.0009818601,0.0006327212,0.00033420027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044878586,0.00083962275,0.00080151897,0.002117092,0.0015413573,0.004630676,0.0026031777,0.002314744,0.0026820211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014721392,0.0006113849,0.0015113623,0.0014190206,0.0045758686,0.004881698,0.0037189496,0.0020561628,0.00031958148],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026290544,0.00022308441,0.0023511434,0.00062682,0.00019091449,0.0014577205,0.002932251,0.4034996,0.008359247,0.4886149,0.0018911869,0.08959026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005141357,0.00005109395,0.00031998137,0.00010487817,0.0000687901,0.00018139288,0.0005820509,0.78730434,0.0036143241,0.20088768,0.0068039466,0.000030067651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017878771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019513709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004630676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025316048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014212142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023734331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060774598","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2012.708670","title":"Distinctive features of persuasion and deliberation dialogues","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Deliberation; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.025605581682113382,"score_gpt":0.2613166062438729,"score_spread":0.2357110245617595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060774598","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099714726,0.002325109,0.6127764,0.007440122,0.0003903088,0.0005900404,0.0003842686,0.0010179245,0.27536118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9131189,0.00031785376,0.07314016,0.00043581778,0.00018035682,0.0006418004,0.00014626313,0.00016843296,0.011850366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98527074,0.008757159,0.00086004095,0.0017818984,0.002327467,0.0010027175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876061,0.008201209,0.0013768282,0.0012377292,0.0009376835,0.00064032484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051991427,0.000546633,0.0006648195,0.0014836306,0.002518296,0.0059957555,0.0009233275,0.0032508485,0.006366631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017930204,0.0005287497,0.00076121156,0.001260921,0.012471035,0.007913425,0.0046136198,0.0029241352,0.0010334748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052380547,0.00001585948,0.00033713496,0.000092207745,0.0000071691475,0.00016733122,0.007403892,0.00050330616,0.00086419546,0.9813856,0.0005487817,0.008622161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051121253,0.0000589748,0.0008474601,0.000066824214,0.000013773658,0.000649019,0.0023374034,0.0043643876,0.0009162678,0.9442943,0.04636194,0.00003840317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007751022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035160332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006366631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015858186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012273449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02749604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163927353","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2013.858183","title":"On a razor's edge: evaluating arguments from expert opinion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Expert opinion; Computer science; Matching (statistics); Scheme (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Point (geometry); Management science; Mathematics; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047598238155062575,"score_gpt":0.3282752797136055,"score_spread":0.2806770415585429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163927353","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06271389,0.00069259113,0.9149946,0.004062297,0.00023263367,0.00021954201,0.00006315319,0.00026725972,0.0167541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5516129,0.00025492345,0.4441519,0.0006489387,0.00014010273,0.00017671399,0.00011406315,0.00015921172,0.0027411573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9522154,0.034297414,0.0017739617,0.0019976064,0.008967819,0.00074770884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8616405,0.115237184,0.0049860002,0.006012856,0.010676761,0.0014466419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043164257,0.000949242,0.0013417598,0.00375913,0.0024289086,0.007908814,0.0018988692,0.0042534783,0.0046488526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16557163,0.0006016447,0.0014128844,0.0018829574,0.0076691974,0.01376755,0.004398014,0.0038123,0.00063333276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009115065,0.00011653504,0.003551602,0.00056465925,0.00022273418,0.00029199806,0.0060493625,0.015429032,0.002895452,0.76553065,0.0035871207,0.20084931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015757263,0.0003231482,0.0016944056,0.00043002624,0.0001559021,0.00026533505,0.0017748701,0.15580308,0.0051474078,0.8188417,0.015282087,0.00012454636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001503963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019765499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043164257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002658498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001890358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22827715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2383705587","doi":"10.3233/aac-160001","title":"Combining explanation and argumentation in dialogue","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Mistake; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.020496174408077578,"score_gpt":0.25715131540016856,"score_spread":0.23665514099209098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2383705587","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023021398,0.004676067,0.91496783,0.006352413,0.00035723904,0.00015841369,0.00006119402,0.00054135855,0.049864143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7393842,0.0018228577,0.25123876,0.0006417068,0.00037879986,0.00024970341,0.00012544595,0.00010963326,0.0060489117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98064625,0.015104425,0.0006682022,0.0011594502,0.0018139922,0.00060771813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98759395,0.009902765,0.00041295122,0.0011766971,0.00057337654,0.000340224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01106965,0.0009929035,0.0013459867,0.0022433568,0.0020695461,0.008397271,0.0016620678,0.0038956034,0.0043242364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018120563,0.0007746155,0.0013110072,0.001595438,0.008307477,0.014318544,0.008794966,0.0026872824,0.0006331079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100800105,0.000041238924,0.0005505365,0.0003209304,0.00007267245,0.0003022808,0.004001161,0.010076474,0.0009859761,0.92656285,0.001338722,0.055646382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035514484,0.000048430276,0.00021497435,0.000111916874,0.000043647837,0.0001799717,0.00048293552,0.03097199,0.00062235567,0.94621176,0.021041604,0.00003487417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014616171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011409785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01106965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019561658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016517059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05854261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520165696","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2016.1171255","title":"Argumentative meanings and their stylistic configurations in clinical research publications","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Syntagmatic analysis; Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Linguistics; Topos theory; Deixis; Computer science; Semantic field; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Anaphora (linguistics); Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4129835440451434,"score_gpt":0.4416579211516708,"score_spread":0.02867437710652737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520165696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68094516,0.006121858,0.17346582,0.010282258,0.0006214848,0.0005542222,0.0019066631,0.00049712526,0.1256054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976218,0.0005873058,0.021360751,0.000108475106,0.000116947216,0.00019206954,0.0004014006,0.0001168138,0.0008982883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9599685,0.028870026,0.004131183,0.0018495538,0.004381701,0.0007990301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8536687,0.118794315,0.011762753,0.00927193,0.0053520193,0.0011502823],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017033944,0.00049190025,0.00061868096,0.016196527,0.006359215,0.017885638,0.0011510277,0.0015436411,0.003460285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.096250355,0.0010035167,0.0005919819,0.015222516,0.013354438,0.012725482,0.0073162233,0.0028917636,0.00058571156],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018431335,0.000038964714,0.0083303405,0.00048098736,0.000046868285,0.00077348866,0.18502583,0.00081777986,0.0048780665,0.7599035,0.0017415899,0.0377783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009730723,0.0001290984,0.027681217,0.0016073039,0.00015510553,0.004125363,0.15848632,0.011635528,0.0062296297,0.6563425,0.13327934,0.0002312406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000843471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012283337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98296607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004366541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021888681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09008521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547096835","doi":"10.3233/aac-160009","title":"Towards a richer model of deliberation dialogue: Closure problem and change of circumstances","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; University of Aberdeen; Research Councils UK","keywords":"Deliberation; Computer science; Closure (psychology); Natural (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Extension (predicate logic); Epistemology; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Engineering; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.048548728188101645,"score_gpt":0.26416095909912046,"score_spread":0.21561223091101883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547096835","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02511116,0.00047143977,0.95239645,0.006055927,0.00012447036,0.00014771667,0.00011008161,0.00024358729,0.015339068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6132549,0.00047831918,0.38093334,0.0007206469,0.00021536149,0.00041648126,0.00022124215,0.0001535167,0.0036061602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868302,0.008965939,0.000792812,0.0014574801,0.0012888333,0.0006647462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97088045,0.018318612,0.00261136,0.0052169533,0.0013104398,0.0016622663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013896745,0.0007510519,0.001898901,0.0018127426,0.0028619585,0.009980164,0.0030955619,0.005903878,0.0047299336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04000671,0.00097310235,0.0033284638,0.0015883173,0.011377483,0.02589868,0.008906432,0.0076530366,0.00063053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010122682,0.0000558434,0.0008803676,0.00010496012,0.000028256369,0.00025565983,0.0045483033,0.030482413,0.0006446644,0.952532,0.0007847622,0.009581542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041227482,0.000054196593,0.00022377179,0.00007682896,0.000024019517,0.00017417944,0.0010262436,0.17049673,0.00042976276,0.8196861,0.007722446,0.000044394223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002641967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017250781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013896745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002830186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021837053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0734939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594775042","doi":"10.3233/aac-170015","title":"Emotions and personality traits in argumentation: An empirical evaluation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Psychology; Personality; Big Five personality traits; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09652659358343366,"score_gpt":0.44032800250599785,"score_spread":0.34380140892256417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594775042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997063,0.00033291033,0.00040164412,0.00006895488,0.00002168173,0.0002926115,0.00033168332,0.000005558359,0.001481902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964264,0.00027968633,0.0007617297,0.00006649934,0.000042589054,0.0006672547,0.0005273483,0.000010022716,0.0012184408],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710387,0.0017601924,0.00020923134,0.0002959151,0.00046780956,0.00016297937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97775936,0.01394196,0.0029864823,0.0012045347,0.0021858783,0.0019218401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006674057,0.00045560245,0.0006173339,0.0019024606,0.0010024995,0.0015425957,0.0005507665,0.0009150556,0.00487803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016770843,0.0002594542,0.0012933606,0.0011128061,0.0009885051,0.000839346,0.001032746,0.0010606565,0.001374165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021816525,0.003865506,0.9459692,0.0004890553,0.00036267922,0.0005047028,0.0075444807,0.00033145415,0.00041121483,0.00075454445,0.0018638333,0.035721686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019746856,0.0018813827,0.9866253,0.00013802366,0.00020705898,0.0005099121,0.00537365,0.0014399866,0.00019130221,0.00050771976,0.0028894108,0.00003873138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009242209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000752328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006674057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054037536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036612136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0352962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752756221","doi":"10.3233/aac-170027","title":"Ontological representations of rhetorical figures for argument mining","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Science and Engineering Research Board; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Natural language processing; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.06141192465762198,"score_gpt":0.3821481057053004,"score_spread":0.3207361810476784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752756221","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065728347,0.000660023,0.9748107,0.0016198464,0.00012970757,0.00032641212,0.0020700938,0.001033121,0.012777254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08982019,0.0007798676,0.901221,0.00022503646,0.00008435149,0.0005510258,0.0047222436,0.0002486666,0.0023476426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964561,0.0015339917,0.0005220279,0.0003971,0.00093211106,0.00015865582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940644,0.0032543405,0.00053900795,0.0013355444,0.0006072998,0.00019936601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004009389,0.0009543184,0.00081779447,0.009890767,0.0028650872,0.007227654,0.0023935155,0.0017175849,0.0072152787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018948872,0.00081515196,0.0030263138,0.009433295,0.0024423886,0.011962343,0.0035021105,0.003443321,0.0024990207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032532957,0.000095955846,0.0014778164,0.0003883463,0.00006018787,0.00023008163,0.002639896,0.008685062,0.001242041,0.8828461,0.0061208503,0.096181124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018528619,0.000021661303,0.0008985723,0.00047741295,0.00007328329,0.0002649147,0.0020918509,0.0977225,0.0019225848,0.7633438,0.1331115,0.000053415955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004859195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007971955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009890767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031193513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025325527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024137557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761184889","doi":"10.3233/aac-170028","title":"Rhetorical figures as argument schemes – The proleptic suite","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Suite; Computer science; Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.038906016433585586,"score_gpt":0.31649280903842114,"score_spread":0.27758679260483554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761184889","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023471123,0.0020905226,0.6968586,0.0072210785,0.0004051714,0.00017329487,0.00066603225,0.0009692376,0.26814494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61240906,0.0021434259,0.35626337,0.0009402117,0.00044698972,0.00037982734,0.0008748388,0.0010936111,0.025448527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947261,0.0030059486,0.00031738202,0.0006286648,0.0011219044,0.00019986875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99208295,0.0045657596,0.0005343289,0.0018988099,0.0006850089,0.00023310934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005629953,0.0007054197,0.00082544197,0.004013298,0.0031545684,0.01594695,0.0016920344,0.0025452296,0.0126126455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019260732,0.00076420826,0.0010462786,0.0035521225,0.017047906,0.025390573,0.0052032284,0.0036289436,0.00427726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036131737,0.0000015753718,0.000045764555,0.000022099077,0.0000015407608,0.000014547129,0.00062532205,0.00010615795,0.00007790612,0.99544984,0.00047046586,0.0031810913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006283786,0.000004973027,0.00007988633,0.00006759915,0.0000048447337,0.00008199999,0.0006467952,0.002327444,0.00032877355,0.95881814,0.03762477,0.0000085008105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080142426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009998998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01594695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020126998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015199012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042193472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763036384","doi":"10.3233/aac-170030","title":"Rhetorical figures, arguments, computation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Computation; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Programming language","score_opus":0.027162982335720814,"score_gpt":0.32232926865245237,"score_spread":0.2951662863167316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763036384","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047980312,0.07887578,0.60185826,0.034485284,0.0016305792,0.00013307942,0.00079630775,0.0012663414,0.232974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74839544,0.019253928,0.19614397,0.0020140915,0.0030322399,0.00024773463,0.0007909882,0.0004785828,0.029642958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979522,0.0010002992,0.00013252831,0.00040855515,0.0004047457,0.00010160435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99477464,0.003944766,0.00031308105,0.0004965983,0.0003365773,0.00013441339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024318786,0.0007170116,0.0011291412,0.0043227687,0.002896288,0.012018177,0.0013354251,0.0033000328,0.014692357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010740886,0.0009005509,0.00087728596,0.005246506,0.013569112,0.021245101,0.0023506593,0.0042673773,0.0026537674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010114877,0.00001304929,0.00012348252,0.00011718125,0.0000070460783,0.00003745259,0.0003629194,0.00037508033,0.0002130935,0.98215365,0.0029093267,0.013677606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046818795,0.0000024021203,0.00008893993,0.000029424364,0.0000058505752,0.000061388775,0.000110716144,0.0011748574,0.00009502169,0.98796964,0.010452039,0.000005124909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002324801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021110463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014692357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031021172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013189517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049150884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786363783","doi":"10.3233/aac-180039","title":"Representing argumentation schemes with Constraint Handling Rules (CHR)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Constraint (computer-aided design); Computer science; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023315311911732382,"score_gpt":0.278048186050768,"score_spread":0.2547328741390356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786363783","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003212918,0.00017858465,0.9899558,0.00026161745,0.00006351117,0.00018761563,0.00033997727,0.0019573476,0.0038426335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0536165,0.00033572828,0.94104373,0.00017979917,0.00005584694,0.0004181957,0.0008514887,0.00031980316,0.003178907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547714,0.0016680699,0.0006882042,0.0007950827,0.0009884939,0.00038302634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99326104,0.0037495785,0.00089605455,0.0010627742,0.00083276053,0.00019780759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004389643,0.0013915554,0.0008290767,0.0025768983,0.0012598742,0.0053899437,0.0037403796,0.002970572,0.0069015273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010739042,0.0010402952,0.0028740116,0.002561386,0.0028246336,0.006753435,0.0030999137,0.00337885,0.002134513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008626961,0.000088657966,0.00046439012,0.0005499433,0.00008887281,0.0010477916,0.001186648,0.061977044,0.0053746398,0.8576587,0.005168522,0.06630856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018349839,0.000117470656,0.00023968105,0.00025297722,0.000158347,0.0011582826,0.00029241614,0.28575924,0.016916294,0.51367277,0.18108034,0.00016867046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047658086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037166432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069015273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011335183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002320261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023214936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810540096","doi":"10.3233/aac-180037","title":"An annotation scheme for Rhetorical Figures","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Annotation; Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Natural language processing; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028278597947934452,"score_gpt":0.35779315040429455,"score_spread":0.3295145524563601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810540096","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009198661,0.00028216734,0.93852264,0.0032815465,0.0011085417,0.00033658408,0.0024847048,0.005158837,0.03962638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10056335,0.00040093856,0.8720481,0.000790039,0.00042134346,0.000591502,0.003418221,0.0016386749,0.020127881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.993646,0.0025595932,0.00094144477,0.0011398705,0.0013942523,0.0003188363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750004,0.009535926,0.0015566417,0.0075466875,0.005646658,0.0007136894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007821249,0.00075441215,0.00065733783,0.006890336,0.0042899125,0.0057481453,0.0022926203,0.003276324,0.019951414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027780486,0.0010352742,0.0009868358,0.0046217004,0.0041836184,0.01281909,0.0052919784,0.0039091767,0.0101401275],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012617672,0.000034924717,0.0011127449,0.00022206052,0.000009919353,0.0002675388,0.0037245145,0.0010801229,0.0046506794,0.86278754,0.019464638,0.10651908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035225647,0.000079120866,0.0007788497,0.00042197574,0.000044992932,0.0006916987,0.0009509429,0.015553295,0.009109879,0.3436363,0.62859553,0.00010220426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014788412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012701307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019951414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002213794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022078583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06674409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001675652","doi":"10.3233/aac-190480","title":"Using argumentation schemes to find motives and intentions of a rational agent","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09130547309951224,"score_gpt":0.3223798003914414,"score_spread":0.23107432729192912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001675652","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026639817,0.0002897301,0.96492887,0.0007700584,0.000046581048,0.00019007469,0.00006509934,0.00019206815,0.0068777627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21184745,0.00014560366,0.7859428,0.000055350203,0.000018102297,0.00013561104,0.000094585135,0.000029862356,0.0017305628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932239,0.0042092334,0.00052135356,0.0007236283,0.0011744573,0.00014751503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98022157,0.015130444,0.0013582077,0.0016141318,0.0012342787,0.00044133482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010611657,0.0009042335,0.00070031657,0.0041497736,0.0016757008,0.0042548054,0.0021585166,0.0023198703,0.0051421546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035641197,0.00056806917,0.0015204743,0.0013235606,0.003372076,0.0101653,0.0034741259,0.0016168347,0.00078279024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018781665,0.000103789,0.002775221,0.00036540627,0.00014933036,0.00020715824,0.0029917143,0.026251677,0.0027630127,0.85149044,0.0011103223,0.111604184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013302406,0.00011637839,0.0008208677,0.00029399723,0.00010172829,0.00023878567,0.001039149,0.20999809,0.0051223054,0.76271677,0.019325674,0.000093193055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008860037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010785393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010611657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012292203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014565693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056120455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122806568","doi":"10.1080/19462160903494576","title":"A dialogue model of belief","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.021761945398715867,"score_gpt":0.2552434514275449,"score_spread":0.23348150602882903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122806568","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012876831,0.0017648048,0.81536317,0.011732721,0.00036715664,0.000114662005,0.0002858159,0.00035702484,0.1571377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73661095,0.0011592179,0.22512722,0.0013196268,0.00046643894,0.0004130832,0.0003122779,0.000113580456,0.03447761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963218,0.0019636985,0.000177899,0.0005698991,0.0006899551,0.00027673383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969091,0.0016610126,0.0001972282,0.0004889524,0.0004401665,0.0003034643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032938719,0.0006272436,0.0006331315,0.0011749001,0.0021075055,0.0062847477,0.0020950404,0.0027433333,0.009521802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061936327,0.00041899332,0.0012054438,0.0010968711,0.0055337846,0.011077597,0.00405448,0.0030903427,0.0014404092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008417784,0.0000059974964,0.000038723323,0.000014487536,0.0000035022276,0.00003695375,0.0004837185,0.0010817641,0.00007864371,0.995837,0.0004132081,0.0019976695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002354094,0.000022149112,0.00004924687,0.00003361386,0.0000114198965,0.00010486369,0.00022394935,0.020841938,0.00014490068,0.9515743,0.026955275,0.000014867147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028829006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016377588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009521802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00300531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017704227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031853616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}