{"meta":{"query_hash":"40548d49253d","filters":{"venue":"Argument & Computation"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/40548d49253d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Argument+%26+Computation"},"results":[{"id":"W2002330963","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2011.637641","title":"Reasoning about knowledge using defeasible logic","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Defeasible estate; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Model-based reasoning; Descriptive knowledge; Computer science; Non-monotonic logic; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Knowledge representation and reasoning; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1088828001548048,"score_gpt":0.3128346801907785,"score_spread":0.2039518800359737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002330963","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12533858,0.0002304407,0.8690423,0.000015972639,0.0006186712,0.00029432424,3.888967e-7,0.00013956413,0.004319769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.854069,0.0000049310647,0.14571008,0.000051687468,0.00006257052,0.0000147284945,0.0000053523895,0.000008440327,0.00007320024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883705,0.00012246342,0.00028354122,0.00033775833,0.00019075719,0.00022841622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993687,0.000033425,0.00019194327,0.0002241211,0.000108566994,0.000073222094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035580937,0.0001324799,0.00013305529,0.00013213459,0.00019361377,0.00010028935,0.00026444852,0.000050909395,0.000024043396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015239621,0.00012839536,0.00005712185,0.00029343468,0.000013634701,0.0005788236,0.00010961636,0.00006344839,0.00018783404],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058637084,0.0021314141,0.06938591,0.00044928055,0.0002872377,0.00007676056,0.062468,0.037338663,0.030964283,0.60207665,0.0018723583,0.1928908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004988425,0.00008278702,0.040017802,0.000119252145,0.000014679377,0.000022534301,0.000062982646,0.9501312,0.003334389,0.0051438403,0.0003119192,0.00025976868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015001459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001054474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91279256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108893255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046053396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5235811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030170053","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2010.486481","title":"The structure of argumentation in health product messages","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Product (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010800036087300326,"score_gpt":0.28007552190688106,"score_spread":0.2692754858195807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030170053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8643826,0.00012829523,0.1306229,0.002945363,0.0011581705,0.0006566317,0.0000020447242,0.00004807728,0.000055885725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896189,0.000019380237,0.010177506,0.00007599616,0.000049562394,0.000006203418,0.0000147517185,0.0000049180794,0.0000327669],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871284,0.00013470874,0.00044159865,0.00024199726,0.00030447537,0.00016439981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917346,0.0000939559,0.00037355238,0.00025012688,0.00007436925,0.000034561694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053974125,0.00009147757,0.000118540476,0.00009342923,0.00014548744,0.00008793038,0.00026183744,0.000021562424,0.000004528696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003158291,0.000068288915,0.000026828184,0.00027991022,0.000021866566,0.00034569638,0.00004675197,0.00012069238,0.000004791044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028821489,0.00034777896,0.048708346,0.00028463895,0.00005734975,0.0000022684417,0.011892798,0.024035266,0.21512091,0.15169615,0.0016344148,0.5461913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015621587,0.00017855772,0.5828178,0.00010267694,0.000005587971,0.000011035845,0.00022685113,0.33469787,0.060995225,0.016417293,0.0026646159,0.00032032726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025187247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048381422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54587096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004578902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000643371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27847412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046052255","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2014.1001790","title":"Context-aware reconfiguration of large-scale surveillance systems: argumentative approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Control reconfiguration; Argumentative; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Scale (ratio); Political science; Embedded system; Geography","score_opus":0.031684915621979254,"score_gpt":0.27530688808844095,"score_spread":0.2436219724664617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046052255","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04326212,0.00041332742,0.9430575,0.00011995506,0.000760671,0.00051577645,0.0000104752135,0.00015253187,0.011707692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990953,0.000010202647,0.008467478,0.00007649294,0.00007594665,0.00004803079,0.00010535699,0.000010529711,0.00025293828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981026,0.00031799273,0.00045567306,0.0004400356,0.0004141065,0.00026960226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985716,0.00011421889,0.00039632487,0.000279553,0.00050874375,0.00012956372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085773587,0.00018489994,0.000308927,0.0001117762,0.00010172968,0.00013551542,0.0003639609,0.00007307216,0.000004055717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004332139,0.00016961935,0.00006620455,0.00035433617,0.00004146861,0.0005812831,0.00009845367,0.00009267702,0.00006458116],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031231143,0.00442479,0.063287675,0.00092996703,0.0006992113,0.00003297434,0.1700013,0.120596096,0.0011303142,0.44674015,0.03652246,0.15532278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020756384,0.00037646922,0.0049781534,0.00005569428,0.000013275147,0.000018094992,0.0043496443,0.98175806,0.0010805666,0.0028764196,0.0020636292,0.00035434804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000081306614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027010212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9476909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015674644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011759906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69168764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060774598","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2012.708670","title":"Distinctive features of persuasion and deliberation dialogues","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Deliberation; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.025605581682113382,"score_gpt":0.2613166062438729,"score_spread":0.2357110245617595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060774598","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47256783,0.00022447843,0.52636474,0.00011730884,0.00030195314,0.000156935,0.0000011079226,0.00003568505,0.00022996428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875362,0.000014414415,0.012258641,0.000042330925,0.00008038916,0.000008376782,0.000027603804,0.000003824405,0.000028214483],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992957,0.00007957082,0.0001761621,0.00014665457,0.0001869674,0.000114917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959004,0.00005515522,0.00014418237,0.0000922809,0.00006998746,0.000048343383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022517414,0.00007831228,0.00009510986,0.000066899454,0.00008748406,0.000045312147,0.00006888224,0.000032560587,0.0000020137438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018985213,0.000068951886,0.000023794864,0.00009931313,0.000014885739,0.00067300216,0.000053606404,0.000034049044,0.000006993051],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048595437,0.00065805693,0.062240124,0.00018641794,0.00009561042,0.0000013500497,0.042284183,0.002151372,0.030780308,0.115312114,0.0016064378,0.7446354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004626965,0.00010915886,0.9210123,0.000035697612,0.000013409495,0.0000065096083,0.00012131236,0.070627704,0.0060788365,0.0011929547,0.00019494181,0.0001445075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006523963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005355379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85877216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031764477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000830752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2811776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163927353","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2013.858183","title":"On a razor's edge: evaluating arguments from expert opinion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Expert opinion; Computer science; Matching (statistics); Scheme (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Point (geometry); Management science; Mathematics; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047598238155062575,"score_gpt":0.3282752797136055,"score_spread":0.2806770415585429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163927353","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39831364,0.0001478472,0.5969295,0.00088571146,0.002056765,0.00082689227,0.0000017177649,0.00021305251,0.00062486326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674502,0.00001764823,0.031178439,0.00078868214,0.0002357369,0.00015088379,0.00008208959,0.000014888478,0.00008143537],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787474,0.00020407893,0.00043305097,0.0005528332,0.00066342164,0.00027188708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891055,0.00021166018,0.00027275016,0.00037018285,0.00012830243,0.00010655082],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003065409,0.00020381427,0.0001807175,0.00012896743,0.00020679232,0.00035556479,0.00036166242,0.00006784075,0.000121546014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004567025,0.00018967374,0.000070354276,0.0002046358,0.000011148245,0.00076603296,0.0001223629,0.000095696596,0.0013922789],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027503089,0.000787504,0.0021498778,0.0000345247,0.00015080647,0.000004000612,0.008196495,0.023523806,0.036257688,0.015267512,0.0305136,0.8830867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012201748,0.000244121,0.025646055,0.00012648958,0.0000033722756,0.0000013122091,0.000056398872,0.9587817,0.002756782,0.009957687,0.0009245676,0.00028132516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064687774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027923786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9352579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016754695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033712455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2383705587","doi":"10.3233/aac-160001","title":"Combining explanation and argumentation in dialogue","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Mistake; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.020496174408077578,"score_gpt":0.25715131540016856,"score_spread":0.23665514099209098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2383705587","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43570387,0.000026581318,0.5628328,0.0007869689,0.00024606023,0.0001989436,7.826916e-7,0.000057328274,0.00014668723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99379045,0.0000291583,0.0059460904,0.00011380456,0.00003057281,0.000030745327,0.000016767266,0.000005510297,0.00003692014],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893695,0.000107913474,0.00029693005,0.00029155612,0.00021741477,0.00014924187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951386,0.00014024683,0.0001491856,0.00011218829,0.000040672494,0.000043842934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003560258,0.000097266246,0.000104735125,0.00019289815,0.000069864924,0.00008810147,0.000106157095,0.00003803828,0.000004567094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024336592,0.00007814441,0.000017264781,0.00017871795,0.000012309695,0.0009151349,0.000050422805,0.000031889616,0.000035580317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025954047,0.00025720257,0.110251404,0.00005674603,0.000032333024,0.000014037081,0.007826432,0.0017777173,0.037283294,0.11991869,0.00053064036,0.7220256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048528896,0.00022571623,0.6473382,0.00027125631,0.000009122791,0.000014179958,0.00015954241,0.31954017,0.006912901,0.019647362,0.0005600926,0.00046853887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007829454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046483983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.721557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107387175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015212247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31866366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520165696","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2016.1171255","title":"Argumentative meanings and their stylistic configurations in clinical research publications","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Syntagmatic analysis; Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Linguistics; Topos theory; Deixis; Computer science; Semantic field; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Anaphora (linguistics); Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4129835440451434,"score_gpt":0.4416579211516708,"score_spread":0.02867437710652737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520165696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8435839,0.000313904,0.0010094931,0.004487082,0.00067766546,0.00063890143,0.000038158974,0.00010935385,0.14914155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99831814,0.000026556907,0.00022037239,0.00016921393,0.00019258431,0.000055323773,0.0000637448,0.0000075015973,0.00094657147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891084,0.00019174283,0.00034937507,0.0002233334,0.00014681154,0.00017790971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986473,0.0005640812,0.000084957566,0.00008794255,0.00054609723,0.00006964595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009530391,0.00008769818,0.00014648843,0.0001905586,0.00031151975,0.00018928933,0.000072652736,0.000029271812,0.00004292421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004917991,0.000072704206,0.000020897012,0.00007111865,0.00047028458,0.00012894635,0.00006921694,0.00017941016,0.000046933357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013401175,0.00021444798,0.007185252,0.0000076208876,0.00005665558,0.0000024974506,0.102767274,0.000021212845,0.000003808699,0.8757211,0.0073874285,0.006619317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00340575,0.0009813847,0.071165204,0.00008334371,0.000053065934,0.0000059208865,0.108958825,0.027742987,0.000031648367,0.41951066,0.36754552,0.0005156701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023889389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000797336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4562104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000549181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006399394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29647914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547096835","doi":"10.3233/aac-160009","title":"Towards a richer model of deliberation dialogue: Closure problem and change of circumstances","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; University of Aberdeen; Research Councils UK","keywords":"Deliberation; Computer science; Closure (psychology); Natural (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Extension (predicate logic); Epistemology; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Engineering; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.048548728188101645,"score_gpt":0.26416095909912046,"score_spread":0.21561223091101883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547096835","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28311527,0.00012095869,0.7158549,0.0004087655,0.000082777486,0.00027963243,0.0000045841725,0.00002512831,0.0001080213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97541416,0.000058647453,0.024388127,0.000040992833,0.00003168873,0.00003116187,0.0000055654973,0.0000048820525,0.000024759414],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990491,0.0000625883,0.00032047165,0.00021232123,0.00025485552,0.00010063534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993703,0.000039858227,0.0002899345,0.00011349738,0.00015486112,0.000031548436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002673456,0.00008721524,0.0001463866,0.00008503202,0.000035682227,0.000021636974,0.00010612223,0.00004280871,0.0000018048812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009212208,0.00006372839,0.00003101203,0.0001310705,0.000022001568,0.0006072664,0.000047674333,0.000019985318,0.000002185731],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037754522,0.0003641253,0.019218465,0.00046958678,0.00009659225,0.0000010780931,0.0191967,0.008316264,0.10569781,0.07771672,0.0004140371,0.7684709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012663853,0.00022128937,0.041976985,0.0002226078,0.000018584058,0.0000015701254,0.000025269666,0.9192339,0.011000464,0.025783002,0.000045038825,0.00020490472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000064577594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017637567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91091764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030590698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002965823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25987682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594775042","doi":"10.3233/aac-170015","title":"Emotions and personality traits in argumentation: An empirical evaluation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Psychology; Personality; Big Five personality traits; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09652659358343366,"score_gpt":0.44032800250599785,"score_spread":0.34380140892256417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594775042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912,0.000037715377,0.0031573058,0.0013211333,0.0003115872,0.0003292063,0.00000817357,0.000022659546,0.0036122454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986569,0.000005692264,0.000835171,0.00016981357,0.000079562364,0.00004822508,0.00009979756,0.000007673042,0.000097127755],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990239,0.00014501101,0.00020164666,0.00027617643,0.00020900226,0.00014424724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954116,0.000031129573,0.00013648949,0.00017172073,0.000062832114,0.00005665468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062515563,0.00009117194,0.00009768302,0.00007295909,0.0003059182,0.00012454877,0.00009384771,0.000056485736,0.00026185607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017665629,0.00009646457,0.000020801808,0.000048085483,0.000053991975,0.00038647812,0.000022243034,0.0000935315,0.00003572029],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056556968,0.00047028097,0.5451063,0.000014564067,0.00003117702,0.000004135097,0.0153322555,0.0014952925,0.00008885606,0.0036898192,0.00027720237,0.43343356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009690134,0.000092482325,0.8150288,0.000009226871,0.000014566401,0.000005184079,0.00035216383,0.18027104,0.0000018366432,0.0030493687,0.0001202886,0.00008603735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029147597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045605097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43334752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007671285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026313837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3933711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752756221","doi":"10.3233/aac-170027","title":"Ontological representations of rhetorical figures for argument mining","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Science and Engineering Research Board; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Natural language processing; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.06141192465762198,"score_gpt":0.3821481057053004,"score_spread":0.3207361810476784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752756221","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033361603,0.000040158597,0.96358263,0.0010112672,0.0001456751,0.00033137816,0.0000021016137,0.0001349112,0.0013902812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6450034,0.000008140262,0.35474694,0.000039970684,0.00002975151,0.00006156222,0.000010088288,0.0000041639473,0.000095969175],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872434,0.00004445487,0.00036913445,0.00038393665,0.0002871422,0.0001909672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984565,0.00024579043,0.0004681062,0.0005918239,0.00018183306,0.000055954824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026048275,0.0001191249,0.00022403935,0.00009968263,0.00037198883,0.00015644805,0.0007090706,0.000051198178,0.000005463393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020569176,0.00011083646,0.00012647755,0.000090895366,0.000064333566,0.000563846,0.00022133214,0.000053079286,0.000004244533],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063085616,0.00088892854,0.016927341,0.00008992162,0.0002603325,0.000015694339,0.0022558009,0.012879133,0.01016124,0.46638876,0.008313111,0.48175666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014132587,0.0006686781,0.04984435,0.00009313107,0.00008458897,0.000007708832,0.00013702136,0.71813244,0.032456703,0.19358343,0.0030740835,0.0005045844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000227126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010117508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7052533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071856484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027001934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45197797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761184889","doi":"10.3233/aac-170028","title":"Rhetorical figures as argument schemes – The proleptic suite","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Suite; Computer science; Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.038906016433585586,"score_gpt":0.31649280903842114,"score_spread":0.27758679260483554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761184889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53719133,0.0015991217,0.0007441101,0.013440292,0.0017805344,0.00085680746,0.000012310235,0.00019852581,0.44417694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869638,0.000036173114,0.0001012672,0.00040621543,0.00070558477,0.00006348181,0.000021061927,0.000014093654,0.011688287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998864,0.000049279504,0.00022789625,0.0002384809,0.00039448388,0.00022586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914867,0.00007574233,0.0002347686,0.0003842114,0.00011872917,0.000037857277],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022963743,0.00016232362,0.00017415595,0.000048996404,0.0017860178,0.000934027,0.00034685875,0.000020544503,0.00085529516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080987535,0.00010408876,0.00011586886,0.000016581042,0.000320576,0.00031601798,0.00015305997,0.000101562866,0.00048946426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034800512,0.00036832568,0.0015587476,0.00005554006,0.0010283046,0.00002625177,0.05078482,0.00056283455,0.00005853726,0.84537613,0.03485425,0.065291435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016624788,0.0005128076,0.009980768,0.000232866,0.001054599,0.000007413932,0.02730168,0.009342112,0.00072065677,0.06560856,0.88254493,0.0010311218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025778924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027641313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8476907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053581236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021625649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763036384","doi":"10.3233/aac-170030","title":"Rhetorical figures, arguments, computation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Computation; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Programming language","score_opus":0.027162982335720814,"score_gpt":0.32232926865245237,"score_spread":0.2951662863167316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763036384","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065948092,0.0004309078,0.9872376,0.0017869398,0.0006606035,0.00027628193,0.0000015293607,0.00070477626,0.002306565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66692364,0.000011996676,0.33256817,0.00021897934,0.00008105474,0.00001627773,0.00002093857,0.000010075651,0.00014888404],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983343,0.00006917737,0.00030344937,0.0004951463,0.00050267787,0.00029527204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871486,0.00007025053,0.00039545662,0.00055557274,0.00016468098,0.000099194534],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031486282,0.00019652616,0.00018359564,0.0001241995,0.0007393271,0.0010922886,0.0011442677,0.00008827359,0.0000074077216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008575845,0.00018758114,0.00006838309,0.00012403783,0.000053771513,0.0014495732,0.00042444668,0.00018299416,0.00009689232],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019002044,0.00027700013,0.0015324687,0.00007375252,0.000056767327,0.00006995333,0.0007297055,0.00095721416,0.0019898603,0.16686712,0.013140815,0.81428635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001592766,0.00034372383,0.009482603,0.00022614258,0.00003375537,0.00005432687,0.000024282273,0.5483994,0.013891124,0.41774324,0.0072436715,0.0009649983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006802336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000031616078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81332135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016156629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047159912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786363783","doi":"10.3233/aac-180039","title":"Representing argumentation schemes with Constraint Handling Rules (CHR)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Constraint (computer-aided design); Computer science; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023315311911732382,"score_gpt":0.278048186050768,"score_spread":0.2547328741390356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786363783","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3984802,0.0000258017,0.5998688,0.00022934566,0.0002654114,0.00024896784,7.996078e-7,0.00014853786,0.00073212304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8935252,0.000003969649,0.10601466,0.00013091323,0.00019047393,0.000021892245,0.000031757583,0.000010602573,0.00007053411],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983678,0.000092631,0.000368193,0.0004799455,0.0004319762,0.00025948937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990331,0.000081849736,0.0003127191,0.0002644659,0.00023545336,0.00007241264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039500016,0.00016318457,0.00015266058,0.00014316611,0.00034045728,0.0003434513,0.00022551553,0.000044278237,0.000023203971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025933037,0.00014433173,0.00004206491,0.00025397385,0.000066950284,0.00082541746,0.00008660654,0.0000709421,0.00015209123],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014791013,0.0008916143,0.08953054,0.00033667797,0.0005895255,0.000060484173,0.022301601,0.01348978,0.06651687,0.18921998,0.0024422277,0.6144728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018525227,0.00036130313,0.026015084,0.00025454143,0.000029282377,0.00003882771,0.00035155646,0.9295856,0.03671076,0.0026758302,0.0016521929,0.00047250726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007494669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016936176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9160958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080657774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050216036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58856773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810540096","doi":"10.3233/aac-180037","title":"An annotation scheme for Rhetorical Figures","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Annotation; Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Natural language processing; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028278597947934452,"score_gpt":0.35779315040429455,"score_spread":0.3295145524563601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810540096","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030295463,0.000017333923,0.9681867,0.00033302634,0.00014537993,0.00025600832,9.824892e-7,0.00044576026,0.00031939187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55429685,0.0000016083359,0.44532683,0.00016711596,0.00011340418,0.000033965403,0.000025250345,0.0000055556566,0.000029437466],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989659,0.00004223447,0.00021701488,0.00036677145,0.00022529085,0.00018278185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991711,0.00007073621,0.00012366995,0.0002751189,0.00029836336,0.00006103329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020594736,0.00010738741,0.000111902,0.000127184,0.00018008622,0.00013184025,0.00034010987,0.00004268655,0.000005531365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029159788,0.00010745275,0.000051065894,0.00032555687,0.000032992473,0.0009289562,0.000045699275,0.00004175532,0.00003344668],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039426268,0.00044416066,0.00094623666,0.000027533919,0.000062485,0.0000023595537,0.0018171795,0.002604613,0.037807196,0.31277138,0.008235228,0.6352422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002707397,0.0005445107,0.0013369258,0.000009707084,0.000008439741,0.0000014744552,0.000016519398,0.88526136,0.023161767,0.08541729,0.0037954405,0.0001758198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000053163844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004712946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88265675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008235838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024048604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4381796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001675652","doi":"10.3233/aac-190480","title":"Using argumentation schemes to find motives and intentions of a rational agent","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09130547309951224,"score_gpt":0.3223798003914414,"score_spread":0.23107432729192912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001675652","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41143903,0.00002597583,0.58726215,0.00088780106,0.00008980869,0.00023523135,0.0000023573164,0.00002518781,0.000032439806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.896862,0.000004033134,0.10275597,0.00029777776,0.000037725615,0.000010710424,0.000016357011,0.000004701036,0.000010735484],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891096,0.00006613241,0.0003202061,0.00027414958,0.00032560294,0.000102923674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947244,0.000043899632,0.00017716715,0.00008139476,0.0001327309,0.000092340044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013725077,0.000096278294,0.00012264447,0.00010501748,0.0001005346,0.00008515774,0.000109981214,0.00002415386,0.000008854509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041410676,0.00009959859,0.00003674505,0.00027730796,0.000014743491,0.00046944854,0.00009514946,0.000036562607,0.000011953396],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057888203,0.0004373229,0.021796854,0.00029271533,0.00021424014,0.0000048579827,0.02840147,0.14636813,0.6637791,0.077654205,0.0008478606,0.060145393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054148486,0.00014421297,0.063998654,0.00005246234,0.000014429944,0.000002552196,0.00020087331,0.9221579,0.011985806,0.00059666205,0.00017031145,0.00013468448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021806876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022277184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77578974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044637152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035769444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40615124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122806568","doi":"10.1080/19462160903494576","title":"A dialogue model of belief","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.021761945398715867,"score_gpt":0.2552434514275449,"score_spread":0.23348150602882903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122806568","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35559598,0.0000058143887,0.64329624,0.00016172208,0.00036930272,0.00012907463,0.0000014123539,0.000048828057,0.00039161107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9364791,0.0000021013122,0.06332111,0.00007565379,0.000042859305,0.0000100354855,0.000012099165,0.000004499854,0.00005252539],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991753,0.000027708322,0.00024936924,0.00019934209,0.00023419783,0.00011409851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994492,0.00004091413,0.00016294625,0.00021450536,0.00008873081,0.000043704604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022370115,0.000077517296,0.00010505471,0.000082449274,0.00005799843,0.000040905925,0.00022688298,0.00004336853,0.000004853091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014785111,0.000073660674,0.000043043532,0.0001294391,0.000013733361,0.00031644682,0.000065317276,0.00007124516,0.000033730492],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001124543,0.00042417663,0.004389017,0.00009487918,0.000050654162,0.000002468032,0.0062603094,0.21201761,0.3406103,0.32648644,0.0016277364,0.108025156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027838518,0.00003287002,0.0038505897,0.00000836854,0.0000032985624,0.0000013195953,0.0000044650656,0.9846928,0.0059733386,0.004967855,0.00010791065,0.00007877608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058479236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026402966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7726752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014227265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033833927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3003795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}