{"meta":{"query_hash":"0f04f8ec0c3d","filters":{"venue":"Argumentation"},"cohort_total":44,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":44,"exported":44,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0f04f8ec0c3d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Argumentation"},"results":[{"id":"W141175123","doi":"10.1023/a:1007837321284","title":"Slippery Slopes and Collapsing Taboos","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.033965186975042326,"score_gpt":0.25552911910522963,"score_spread":0.2215639321301873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W141175123","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120493084,0.004281662,0.42561245,0.030853134,0.0014078775,0.00029767046,0.00039811723,0.0008071425,0.41584885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9291552,0.0008903116,0.04815567,0.0010918817,0.00029711786,0.00020462564,0.00016316916,0.0006414496,0.019400649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776058,0.013400985,0.001044089,0.0022525194,0.003970863,0.0017256704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9491571,0.029319683,0.0027139771,0.0115562575,0.00571809,0.0015349238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01847293,0.00086253835,0.001722072,0.0073458613,0.010253362,0.01674169,0.0027641421,0.005212779,0.025062615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10893917,0.0011479629,0.0012033787,0.005607146,0.040437285,0.027105238,0.015256558,0.0074088746,0.003194201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026798261,0.000008660791,0.0003712896,0.00003367922,0.000010743923,0.00011073714,0.00877508,0.00029891645,0.00007398637,0.98062414,0.0017141002,0.0079519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010829645,0.000005527408,0.00012760944,0.00011162109,0.000008938084,0.00006747743,0.0048591886,0.0009930178,0.00010018283,0.9802941,0.013411418,0.000010251396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023994776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002764677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025062615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029700072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033481473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09769535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579722416","doi":"10.1023/a:1012021017836","title":"Walton's Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning: A Critique and Development","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Political communication; Epistemology; Communication studies; Inference; Relation (database); Deductive reasoning; Informal logic; Computer science; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.026188800740009566,"score_gpt":0.31690998357597305,"score_spread":0.2907211828359635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579722416","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007152228,0.031652696,0.6227865,0.17622325,0.0041206856,0.00036754718,0.0004531181,0.000507144,0.15673678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41356027,0.035100084,0.4796005,0.022083644,0.006847944,0.0020560394,0.00039880368,0.0007524109,0.039600313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97362274,0.01330389,0.0021200497,0.0016606122,0.008625391,0.0006672938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9128437,0.066532925,0.0022315858,0.0051094005,0.012171184,0.0011112135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032029305,0.0019453788,0.002889558,0.012863983,0.004996504,0.012774363,0.010816214,0.014968886,0.010155061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08643148,0.0017654427,0.0017868367,0.010121292,0.030171806,0.03141976,0.007149065,0.01241168,0.0033282738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001839622,0.000014640277,0.000045738503,0.00018064001,0.000014418113,0.000020489924,0.0007403086,0.00040835893,0.000023705592,0.98006445,0.0060040224,0.01246485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038384962,0.0000127537905,0.00007378925,0.00031518366,0.000024071374,0.000054404736,0.0002603445,0.0033727312,0.00017506663,0.9637656,0.031886436,0.000021200818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005614744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044383286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032029305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011505118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064564445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16938913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1636107842","doi":"10.1023/a:1007786123170","title":"Antoine Arnauld (1612--1694)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Neurology and Historical Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.02560020867419899,"score_gpt":0.26283795631305384,"score_spread":0.23723774763885486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1636107842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045636003,0.09598889,0.0030545685,0.115553,0.059057746,0.000047625173,0.0013118987,0.00053816853,0.7198846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02748029,0.013749075,0.001374849,0.003436423,0.0051372573,0.000039944756,0.0002075298,0.00019556587,0.94837916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951994,0.00012548508,0.000022574965,0.00012405532,0.00017289731,0.00003514803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896383,0.0006412002,0.00007384627,0.00003088521,0.00015763426,0.00013257033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007832417,0.0009386878,0.00085282297,0.0008364493,0.002380419,0.0024084717,0.00054185925,0.002661758,0.22538312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002623107,0.00024761906,0.0002278492,0.0007670428,0.00085458666,0.0014739991,0.0012994516,0.0020772992,0.07891944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002216552,0.00002818763,0.00024032556,0.0003048474,0.000017552813,0.0008524585,0.00043456143,0.00036133488,0.0010114949,0.06576166,0.81468326,0.116082564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006262178,0.0000060285697,0.00026906954,0.00004688319,0.0000021321068,0.00023785734,0.00009682273,0.00005522646,0.00011945093,0.0019475018,0.997209,0.0000038687444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003951335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004814941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22538312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013775883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000845063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75398165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W183851629","doi":"10.1023/a:1014991300192","title":"Effing the Ineffable: The Logocentric Fallacy in Argumentation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Ambiguity; Focus (optics); Fallacy; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.041503125159252585,"score_gpt":0.3190587741036113,"score_spread":0.2775556489443587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W183851629","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10268783,0.0051121456,0.54135376,0.14783072,0.0010931364,0.0001064179,0.00013802477,0.0003418595,0.20133613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94851285,0.00060374534,0.04363539,0.002551483,0.00035503376,0.0001276008,0.000045288718,0.00011282035,0.0040557613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9597573,0.031524286,0.0012478803,0.0024566022,0.004337163,0.0006767918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8786847,0.10447951,0.003938669,0.008187094,0.0038837919,0.0008261569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02702817,0.00074065843,0.0013845012,0.003327157,0.0057523074,0.010116516,0.0022702343,0.009193472,0.0051391283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.107642464,0.0009372378,0.00077003444,0.0018265992,0.043256536,0.033928342,0.007963057,0.01106094,0.00073425967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018712311,0.000011577449,0.00024429665,0.000034758148,0.0000066497655,0.000050249975,0.0026420648,0.0001736668,0.000066202054,0.99127215,0.00084624,0.0046334034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010867153,0.0000035914993,0.000050469116,0.000029424173,0.000003580409,0.0000617546,0.0004444727,0.0008339031,0.00007979234,0.996545,0.001932187,0.0000049757764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001372804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011827586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02702817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037352357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031711117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14294034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W188319134","doi":"10.1023/a:1019901304146","title":"Manifest Rationality Reconsidered: Reply to my Fellow Symposiasts","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Rationality; Focus (optics); Political communication; Communication studies; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Social science; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07180288928727523,"score_gpt":0.258824402512435,"score_spread":0.18702151322515975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W188319134","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000276695,0.0020347438,0.00014062999,0.96998954,0.026680319,0.00000385085,0.000015083028,0.000010126199,0.0008490004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015016656,0.0024848129,0.00040923222,0.86855066,0.10755566,0.00006787463,0.000025891468,0.000078816185,0.0058104526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98959947,0.0044970973,0.00077328965,0.0020695005,0.0016881037,0.0013724891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9381341,0.04794241,0.0022049134,0.0020079797,0.0070865816,0.0026240814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016691715,0.0012541877,0.0021473968,0.0018282945,0.010173134,0.016130397,0.004896127,0.06835982,0.0064134947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08912195,0.0010127944,0.0028990612,0.0020964914,0.016076786,0.010328318,0.0070678033,0.081780806,0.0031548429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005665465,0.000033742974,0.00016713362,0.00009874124,0.000033699464,0.00031202732,0.0015548681,0.00010625068,0.00008276437,0.04207503,0.9527004,0.0027786766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001793269,0.000039517894,0.0012901247,0.0010385913,0.000112795664,0.000519928,0.0046536094,0.0009796686,0.00036094507,0.10842703,0.88225526,0.00014329211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060483906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055953376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06835982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011700594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00754185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088275254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189468606","doi":"10.1023/a:1019993002329","title":"Johnson on the Metaphysics of Argument","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.09520054357920177,"score_gpt":0.24600124407950533,"score_spread":0.15080070050030356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189468606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012996769,0.05655358,0.13624455,0.19628687,0.002751808,0.00013606674,0.0003414883,0.00020443344,0.59448445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8179347,0.01881339,0.061794177,0.022190236,0.0053684856,0.0004957581,0.00020663995,0.00034098845,0.07285563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98728675,0.0091538215,0.00050150714,0.0009487586,0.0016684136,0.00044081084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96916807,0.026601499,0.0007688418,0.0016483624,0.0014373229,0.00037580187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010121373,0.001128001,0.0019239151,0.004074245,0.0061852382,0.012360065,0.002107355,0.010794548,0.008986511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02553549,0.0011524096,0.0014415008,0.0034586657,0.0421583,0.01831907,0.0028440778,0.009904088,0.0015733091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005043334,0.000005228502,0.000029669429,0.00002384963,0.0000048967795,0.000012885139,0.00031439314,0.00014407054,0.000012310749,0.9963045,0.0022606996,0.00088242674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008177552,0.000001954126,0.000025555939,0.00003676042,0.0000049614596,0.000010767514,0.00009700407,0.0001966594,0.000025835196,0.9914021,0.008186758,0.0000033841347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008366453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059002154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012360065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008945476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044889837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06490433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964844782","doi":"10.1007/s10503-014-9335-1","title":"Challenges and Remedies for Identifying and Classifying Argumentation Schemes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialogical self; Coding (social sciences); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Curriculum; Process (computing); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Social science","score_opus":0.18147610861114416,"score_gpt":0.44384865776279664,"score_spread":0.2623725491516525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964844782","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0721852,0.0023206177,0.8970596,0.015531899,0.0005155372,0.00143041,0.0009838998,0.0035128416,0.0064599523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24560712,0.00064987876,0.7486872,0.00036012765,0.00018574875,0.0006685384,0.0015072267,0.00028237887,0.0020517842],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.932291,0.025851738,0.014963391,0.010649786,0.01470948,0.0015345443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7128561,0.16571252,0.023891855,0.046399094,0.04569334,0.0054470277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043331135,0.0019672513,0.0028950723,0.013673456,0.008160578,0.023459468,0.007848359,0.006785293,0.0036699434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24627042,0.0011540157,0.0023435995,0.0068212766,0.007840647,0.027791074,0.007899119,0.00892213,0.0017672275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031275421,0.0009818847,0.08109717,0.002324947,0.00025586894,0.00039751257,0.011553133,0.005415025,0.007413478,0.1863114,0.012003681,0.6919332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009573691,0.0002639016,0.015059335,0.0027184635,0.0003572632,0.0012783513,0.021373771,0.1489709,0.015231597,0.7391933,0.05512152,0.000335879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033455149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005570815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043331135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003867337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009167232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22915965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977123674","doi":"10.1007/s10503-015-9356-4","title":"A Meta-Level Approach to the Problem of Defining ‘Critical Thinking’","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Critical thinking; Term (time); Computer science; Management science; Strengths and weaknesses; Position (finance); Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.2302165209402242,"score_gpt":0.39378634714610733,"score_spread":0.16356982620588312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977123674","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036355404,0.004319278,0.90931535,0.0433685,0.000882851,0.00025904374,0.00017894118,0.00028788607,0.037752617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22557974,0.0013121419,0.76411676,0.0033134106,0.00079487875,0.0014092621,0.00023579855,0.00023782159,0.0030001544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9258139,0.053102076,0.0077314773,0.004320964,0.008023,0.0010086391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83137536,0.12608618,0.0073478827,0.019368371,0.012790698,0.0030315507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.072354,0.0019985484,0.0035581698,0.017658006,0.006442774,0.02554269,0.007874121,0.009881572,0.009510252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11193008,0.0021599147,0.0030618021,0.010062362,0.04003837,0.03964926,0.010633317,0.013904177,0.0012930386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009683716,0.000012227689,0.00006215545,0.00016669011,0.00003942282,0.000028238323,0.0021726333,0.00031511034,0.00008639936,0.9919191,0.0007461183,0.0044422685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014992336,0.0000090434805,0.000048963528,0.0003050835,0.00002476077,0.00005037121,0.00055449916,0.0015913051,0.00014916131,0.98900294,0.008237195,0.000011665981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018864584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020174398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0117722945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013517021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38264906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979312761","doi":"10.1007/s10503-012-9272-9","title":"The Burden of Criticism: Consequences of Taking a Critical Stance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Criticism; Explication; Epistemology; Dialectic; Normative; Critical appraisal; Critical thinking; Adversary; Critical theory; Presupposition; Negation; Critical thought; Disinformation; Argumentative; Obligation; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.04173456905127048,"score_gpt":0.3358983056179288,"score_spread":0.29416373656665834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979312761","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045046937,0.0024976076,0.04717369,0.59390724,0.004285505,0.00019314239,0.00009789529,0.0002457293,0.3065523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91380525,0.0008116857,0.014034252,0.0550101,0.0044258274,0.00041778854,0.00005685411,0.0003598309,0.0110784685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.85198504,0.09173214,0.005547679,0.009281351,0.03553705,0.0059167817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.39939728,0.47306234,0.02951367,0.03456503,0.052038778,0.011422882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11178651,0.001052738,0.0017049155,0.0075579565,0.019060196,0.019708402,0.00656443,0.045330282,0.013569411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4923894,0.001425131,0.0013121314,0.0039575533,0.043817308,0.031085642,0.017829364,0.025360843,0.002437442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002452582,0.00011261791,0.001566176,0.00018367975,0.000073583986,0.0010804501,0.025443776,0.00039640258,0.00045415806,0.9072177,0.044793624,0.018432679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020108145,0.00003333138,0.00072179106,0.0005186871,0.000067061075,0.0006479149,0.0073820218,0.001579188,0.000414886,0.930167,0.05820321,0.00006387317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002467429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022151289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11178651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078724455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009450321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5911906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982432424","doi":"10.1007/s10503-011-9224-9","title":"Character and Knowledge: Learning from the Speech of Experts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Pathos; Ethos; Character (mathematics); Logos Bible Software; Epistemology; Psychology; Social knowledge; Sociology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13704088616481985,"score_gpt":0.2752474300216571,"score_spread":0.13820654385683723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982432424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.652963,0.0024769735,0.17110796,0.019095665,0.00034862218,0.00019234723,0.0004062271,0.00024710008,0.15316212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822015,0.00048851914,0.012086243,0.00035784562,0.00008243128,0.00006457179,0.00023115933,0.000049851456,0.004437842],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887388,0.00900447,0.00022934946,0.0007602374,0.0009816702,0.00028549702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89719766,0.091938145,0.0024924674,0.0037342734,0.003331615,0.0013057801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0108985845,0.0005947616,0.00052990357,0.0017406539,0.00206646,0.009551718,0.0015064649,0.0036723432,0.0067250654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10214507,0.0003762661,0.00037239073,0.0010198515,0.0070884097,0.017718654,0.004683029,0.0037078762,0.0012825956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008471703,0.00050069694,0.031498786,0.00088838505,0.00012453234,0.0014247106,0.34404674,0.00537562,0.0032855726,0.32454866,0.010482627,0.27697653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007262164,0.00018742098,0.01132349,0.00089895393,0.000059155896,0.00060841895,0.09590506,0.029557724,0.0034640892,0.8098719,0.047945764,0.00010536842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011613009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012416082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0108985845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014100604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014213726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05763793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984962811","doi":"10.1007/s10503-004-2071-1","title":"Begging the Question in Arguments Based on Testimony","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Begging; Argumentation theory; Sequence (biology); Epistemology; Law; Fallacy; Witness; Point (geometry); Testimonial; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics; Advertising","score_opus":0.016594620141704063,"score_gpt":0.2950368186882093,"score_spread":0.27844219854650526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984962811","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11891277,0.0032629461,0.7136793,0.026330842,0.001798454,0.00045576104,0.00025233722,0.00029829072,0.13500938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8465119,0.0012958412,0.14223966,0.0013033414,0.0007077711,0.0002564446,0.00030300647,0.00011273596,0.0072693154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95799464,0.03269952,0.0018655143,0.0018414081,0.0045534866,0.001045502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8344137,0.1513129,0.004225474,0.0048908303,0.003767473,0.0013896088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026617417,0.0013490224,0.0017326204,0.0036478445,0.0045743985,0.01091831,0.0030877509,0.014734574,0.00857119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17338544,0.0014172676,0.0018709867,0.0027115676,0.008187639,0.025530918,0.009273992,0.007850862,0.0014179507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041675704,0.00008343726,0.000655579,0.00066546706,0.00013105659,0.0012195384,0.0068149404,0.0044374894,0.0020924478,0.9585711,0.0025689558,0.02234338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000791984,0.000055715594,0.00025510832,0.00028607363,0.00007517372,0.0002935682,0.0011700268,0.020376727,0.0014059414,0.96656424,0.009393902,0.00004423784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005032559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006093084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026617417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016287621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14076805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987103036","doi":"10.1007/s10503-005-4414-y","title":"The Toulmin Model Today: Introduction to the Special Issue on Contemporary Work using Stephen Edelston Toulmin’s Layout of Arguments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Work (physics); Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Mathematical economics; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Engineering; Social science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.050760762478954675,"score_gpt":0.37433544315000766,"score_spread":0.323574680671053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987103036","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038757324,0.07814444,0.2311855,0.39037898,0.035001636,0.00023082457,0.00028685847,0.00055558136,0.2603404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36912298,0.113751985,0.20254244,0.07211698,0.058094274,0.002188887,0.0006397079,0.0031063175,0.17843646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995622,0.0029834406,0.00019490502,0.00032152951,0.0007003414,0.0001777337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939162,0.0044439295,0.0003528488,0.00036919693,0.0006431225,0.0002746979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005893954,0.0011211161,0.0012695972,0.0047408235,0.0037864593,0.010871068,0.0022566004,0.0059218407,0.0072452305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01207061,0.00065285974,0.0010655335,0.004625139,0.0154121155,0.016617924,0.0036391667,0.010444583,0.002563063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008447752,0.000015762624,0.000049433904,0.00008985749,0.0000050939784,0.000027118509,0.0013012527,0.00014572284,0.00006704762,0.93428296,0.051610194,0.01239719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000734094,0.000010342546,0.000080032776,0.00026212377,0.0000065562476,0.00006874234,0.0004688563,0.0006073414,0.000091621805,0.63473904,0.36364186,0.000016135575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027645575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041032676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010871068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059497263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041806893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043168426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999134038","doi":"10.1007/s10503-008-9110-2","title":"Reasoning from Classifications and Definitions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Epistemology; Informal logic; Argument map; Political communication; Communication studies; Computer science; Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Politics; Machine learning; Law","score_opus":0.08011628943606784,"score_gpt":0.2550434387325153,"score_spread":0.17492714929644743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999134038","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017696345,0.0019890247,0.92218643,0.008962318,0.00039993165,0.00019083831,0.0010163954,0.0007599448,0.046798676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44455877,0.0019358814,0.5334401,0.0013155416,0.00046838593,0.0005044458,0.0035440514,0.00047471115,0.013758099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98593664,0.008484338,0.0010990308,0.0015504769,0.0024386004,0.0004909988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773835,0.015992874,0.0008624695,0.003253025,0.0020960106,0.0004122412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008988843,0.0013055606,0.0014389539,0.0068650683,0.0030634431,0.011919962,0.0031913891,0.003235322,0.013549869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038635403,0.00171891,0.0033063863,0.005464901,0.0062701637,0.03847826,0.0088329865,0.0061399015,0.0027383352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022437238,0.00001635086,0.00024252148,0.00009326587,0.000030460766,0.000102597645,0.0008093202,0.0010721735,0.00016430761,0.9814636,0.0031520806,0.012830739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075921635,0.0000033199096,0.000043032756,0.000061771985,0.000020216132,0.00006106193,0.00028249135,0.0059479605,0.00025570786,0.98260075,0.010708612,0.000007638454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020169877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020069813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013549869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029225505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014883071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0475381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003635366","doi":"10.1007/s10503-011-9233-8","title":"Petitioning the King: The Case of Provincial Printers in Eighteenth-Century France","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Context (archaeology); Narrative; Argumentative; Government (linguistics); Competition (biology); Character (mathematics); Censorship; Law; Sociology; Political science; Literature; History; Art; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.033486149924841696,"score_gpt":0.25422875654256394,"score_spread":0.22074260661772224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003635366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7236507,0.0018696346,0.0020720523,0.040501986,0.00022244838,0.00003010764,0.00005027801,0.00005514344,0.23154767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806322,0.00022695355,0.00025132849,0.0011226779,0.000041526928,0.000007971695,0.000012658863,0.000030437777,0.017674252],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879531,0.0064688893,0.00024286321,0.0008341424,0.0011829758,0.0033180383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818186,0.014373099,0.0008097068,0.00044516486,0.0015410866,0.0010123593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008867193,0.00045694382,0.0008256119,0.0019745992,0.057311762,0.017088529,0.0028559815,0.016958429,0.0072327876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020293847,0.00060797425,0.0005380197,0.0026557117,0.029137338,0.0059610913,0.007206099,0.011213906,0.0006071352],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006377508,0.000038025366,0.0026220046,0.000048845242,0.000024396908,0.0051978757,0.7495039,0.00029319726,0.00024941395,0.23167287,0.005835708,0.0044499533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003764061,0.000031871623,0.005463117,0.00028149056,0.000049040766,0.0010637622,0.67738193,0.0007691338,0.00073228707,0.021441588,0.29266608,0.00008206441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43465084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5149691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43465084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038337123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01832127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8642418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011562498","doi":"10.1007/s10503-011-9205-z","title":"Critical Inquiry: Considering the Context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Dialectic; Critical thinking; Context (archaeology); Relevance (law); Sociology; Discipline; Argument (complex analysis); Variety (cybernetics); Politics; Critical systems thinking; Communication studies; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1333740345554744,"score_gpt":0.3935709428632236,"score_spread":0.2601969083077492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011562498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055268247,0.0496219,0.27647606,0.2984621,0.0040373364,0.00038237107,0.0001464476,0.00019214471,0.3154135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94406897,0.0064233784,0.039004,0.0040247664,0.0012684779,0.00034223386,0.000044962933,0.000102632024,0.004720612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94427204,0.049285796,0.0008505923,0.0020442582,0.002500001,0.0010473854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87280345,0.11324386,0.0037141645,0.0033549909,0.0043131597,0.0025704873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032462597,0.0011809348,0.0015284953,0.0060480866,0.011028097,0.027860122,0.0035357957,0.009256194,0.005674789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07554237,0.0008809722,0.0006944322,0.0037899704,0.08843948,0.034260057,0.010648557,0.009315401,0.00043669227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016860644,0.00001722153,0.00026423598,0.00019148432,0.000012746868,0.00017655999,0.016426358,0.00026595034,0.000073213945,0.9758059,0.0011785813,0.005570833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017014645,0.000010821862,0.00012990601,0.0003872109,0.000010622086,0.00009936909,0.01182475,0.0006059568,0.00010931684,0.9671988,0.019595118,0.000011060126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035836296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005227666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032462597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010002355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01415121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17168069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015722806","doi":"10.1007/s10503-008-9104-0","title":"Evaluating Corroborative Evidence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Topic Modeling","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Social science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.23986453346287462,"score_gpt":0.4065833421626628,"score_spread":0.16671880869978817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015722806","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28686145,0.011588611,0.60876536,0.024012353,0.0013124861,0.00131025,0.002181191,0.0014811793,0.062487062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84119046,0.0013936164,0.15128203,0.0005088197,0.00077534036,0.00035790927,0.0014889438,0.000150254,0.002852575],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89629227,0.06456127,0.0066609886,0.006355863,0.024717076,0.0014125331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.35558704,0.5628299,0.025153657,0.03107917,0.022603367,0.0027467648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061319016,0.0020378684,0.0021758967,0.014513301,0.0032077192,0.011635225,0.0040621837,0.007995498,0.011555404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47731322,0.0015115228,0.0021934884,0.0061355005,0.004431642,0.016601855,0.0077173356,0.0046247547,0.0016985566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003873946,0.0011509834,0.048943847,0.0045986683,0.0023685824,0.0024232746,0.0097265085,0.028822163,0.0065757823,0.31841236,0.017620228,0.5554835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053395174,0.0008130385,0.012231815,0.0025282516,0.0017326933,0.0014489405,0.004370813,0.2133702,0.016452165,0.69912976,0.047165237,0.00022321404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012641498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00196876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061319016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027338215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042321766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3242898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015992625","doi":"10.1007/s10503-009-9174-7","title":"The Uses of Argument in Communicative Contexts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"One Mind","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Oblique case; Argumentation theory; Typology; Epistemology; Proposition; Point (geometry); Psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.017552343735170686,"score_gpt":0.2930221697169443,"score_spread":0.2754698259817736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015992625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14566873,0.03227809,0.3938404,0.019926764,0.00052527495,0.0002289127,0.00033031162,0.00030254727,0.40689892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95979714,0.0030823317,0.031149784,0.00029529957,0.00030927567,0.00026959172,0.00008526254,0.00012319865,0.0048880903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9591606,0.03322115,0.0014212915,0.0017679598,0.0035738915,0.00085514353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89475155,0.09424082,0.002422195,0.0055370824,0.0022205953,0.0008277438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018125014,0.0010364659,0.0011045339,0.007674665,0.0055523915,0.022162745,0.0034484072,0.009192629,0.0066899452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06619379,0.0019242889,0.0013362386,0.00792866,0.03173956,0.046517815,0.005870941,0.0047206827,0.000924357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003475012,0.000017325974,0.00040440587,0.00011780527,0.0000215333,0.00014123965,0.012463055,0.00049505674,0.00022293087,0.97715443,0.00049057783,0.008436842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024332325,0.000013177654,0.00040611625,0.00014998912,0.00002877765,0.00029468397,0.002975689,0.0024831758,0.0003726336,0.97910905,0.014118731,0.000023562341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011274532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000957741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022162745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029748755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014807428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095855355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016904097","doi":"10.1007/s10503-009-9157-8","title":"Wrenching from Context: The Manipulation of Commitments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Dialectic; Fallacy; Argumentation theory; Sociology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025875086071075203,"score_gpt":0.267559195080551,"score_spread":0.2416841090094758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016904097","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09285103,0.0020347838,0.7892966,0.0070335343,0.00055167236,0.00020898992,0.00011240011,0.00065608905,0.10725484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88604516,0.0006760223,0.10377177,0.00041599185,0.00013968615,0.00017941906,0.000121856174,0.00024242498,0.008407731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98867095,0.008270471,0.0003453834,0.0008592518,0.0014127556,0.00044125502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97529477,0.017607331,0.001194249,0.003934144,0.0012341519,0.00073535385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007600214,0.0007656001,0.00077338784,0.0011138046,0.0029221727,0.007651433,0.0029217727,0.0040098727,0.00791012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052780252,0.0008869591,0.0010841877,0.0011147616,0.006133515,0.013753861,0.0068817437,0.004934015,0.0011284112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026120024,0.00006914448,0.00053138315,0.00022054897,0.0000688273,0.00050754886,0.0074377107,0.006970088,0.0048090736,0.9265739,0.0028885677,0.049662013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006658246,0.00004913445,0.00030632547,0.000097897326,0.00006040749,0.00020926908,0.0013403654,0.0578743,0.0032132955,0.9181715,0.018557183,0.000053726915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013418474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000906206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00791012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011661452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016157235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040194273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024283275","doi":"10.1007/s10503-011-9203-1","title":"Enthymemes: From Reconstruction to Understanding","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Phenomenon; Set (abstract data type); Resolution (logic); Philosophy; Computer science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","score_opus":0.3097350493222602,"score_gpt":0.28115900681270983,"score_spread":0.02857604250955037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024283275","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029818257,0.0090582445,0.7185442,0.031850107,0.0006554437,0.00013923987,0.0002302035,0.00051891216,0.20918542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8495025,0.0036704345,0.12993222,0.0014156206,0.00050688797,0.00020595036,0.00030471265,0.00043898588,0.014022647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883847,0.008890635,0.0003546329,0.00080569915,0.0011640659,0.00040014862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891747,0.0072170063,0.00067937304,0.0019207725,0.00065172923,0.00035639724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012408595,0.0010388008,0.0007995585,0.0035281915,0.003450489,0.013392844,0.002815092,0.004609767,0.0072066113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022685999,0.00065655954,0.0009071883,0.0022770262,0.045465965,0.03027562,0.00919392,0.0069491477,0.0012465079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010898476,0.0000034360098,0.00005190014,0.00003269295,0.00000330206,0.000054254477,0.0055073453,0.00022246625,0.00007667279,0.98989105,0.0004454377,0.0037005944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043244877,0.0000047092935,0.000036459012,0.000051188046,0.0000023087723,0.000072111165,0.0019084984,0.0009024747,0.00015622962,0.9828767,0.013979475,0.0000055493583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001347035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009143993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013392844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036539081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022059092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0656237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045422233","doi":"10.1007/s10503-012-9262-y","title":"Teleological Justification of Argumentation Schemes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Teleology; Argumentation theory; Dialogical self; Normative; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Action (physics); Inference; Argumentative; Communication studies; Causality (physics); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.028149674408245035,"score_gpt":0.28112629319507365,"score_spread":0.25297661878682864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045422233","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050255142,0.002703297,0.7764164,0.0079860585,0.0006297888,0.00024873888,0.0003314218,0.00031338225,0.16111572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8539525,0.0011076931,0.12836659,0.00048376186,0.0008197645,0.0004282459,0.00048218388,0.00013602035,0.0142232105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9790876,0.013054879,0.0015571605,0.0013871032,0.00401173,0.0009015089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9506,0.03570075,0.0025713372,0.0053806687,0.0048628533,0.0008843765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013918417,0.0008280425,0.0017609189,0.0047948505,0.00404726,0.008324926,0.003203773,0.0060770065,0.011813315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05240967,0.0013035472,0.0019455919,0.0042091976,0.008898038,0.017803088,0.0043476587,0.0053870836,0.0010052234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018629788,0.0000124847575,0.000040924897,0.000036210455,0.000009335112,0.000020910766,0.00018452817,0.0008895352,0.00006948785,0.9959383,0.00029787712,0.0024817497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020294028,0.0000052440705,0.000035674715,0.000022333013,0.000007149028,0.000015393687,0.00004787728,0.004933507,0.000114857765,0.99274945,0.0020414554,0.0000068061454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011623678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013838289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013918417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004422149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026219035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07360852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063535110","doi":"10.1007/s10503-013-9306-y","title":"Applying Recent Argumentation Methods to Some Ancient Examples of Plausible Reasoning","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Skepticism; Epistemology; Computer science; Deductive reasoning; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology","score_opus":0.04566720233134565,"score_gpt":0.339941475476082,"score_spread":0.29427427314473636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063535110","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019829154,0.009411157,0.85383505,0.008065454,0.00068497466,0.00010261684,0.000179827,0.00024375253,0.107648045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38248155,0.006603953,0.5833624,0.00079982815,0.0009152182,0.00028675332,0.00033468383,0.00016933418,0.02504625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633324,0.0023259008,0.00018762196,0.00023584608,0.0008010374,0.00011635733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945234,0.004252779,0.00015987566,0.00050310354,0.00046328644,0.000097429824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043454487,0.00090029615,0.0007680389,0.002908434,0.0026292708,0.0042012106,0.0025347667,0.0040566935,0.007309612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0174293,0.0005820001,0.0012817039,0.0033295427,0.0069318768,0.0069163386,0.002617056,0.0045877644,0.0009419884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016902182,0.000015874859,0.000072908006,0.0001408994,0.000022696484,0.00015210877,0.00066098745,0.002327052,0.00015450707,0.9816949,0.0017540744,0.012987123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018289295,0.0000067434285,0.000099710895,0.0000725121,0.000013232969,0.00019042242,0.00014878447,0.011829237,0.00026203145,0.9682451,0.019097034,0.000016881248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009556063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013544436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007309612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017905801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000490461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024453104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075620909","doi":"10.1007/s10503-014-9328-0","title":"Argumentum ad Verecundiam: New Gender-based Criteria for Appeals to Authority","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St Joseph's Health Centre; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Appeal; Epistemology; Fallacy; Credibility; Injustice; Prejudice (legal term); Sociology; Trustworthiness; Feminist epistemology; Competence (human resources); Adversarial system; Social psychology; Identification (biology); Psychology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Feminist philosophy","score_opus":0.0956511876628936,"score_gpt":0.41031888371542763,"score_spread":0.31466769605253403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075620909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0545128,0.0025562411,0.3314369,0.03881506,0.0035022276,0.000773986,0.0005281497,0.00043339198,0.5674413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9148034,0.00037712968,0.06658346,0.0015584355,0.0012180492,0.0008610758,0.0002476809,0.00040289282,0.013948013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95672935,0.024453085,0.0039194203,0.004142426,0.00852349,0.0022323006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92373383,0.04997392,0.0052617854,0.006774554,0.011388637,0.002867341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023912756,0.0013886668,0.0021758366,0.012373897,0.009439129,0.025660925,0.0044631525,0.012436551,0.016022079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.099989116,0.0011821098,0.0021693883,0.005491732,0.04822608,0.041841157,0.012293651,0.013277449,0.0022209117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014726479,0.000009520734,0.00019412562,0.000037963884,0.0000045811685,0.000042794316,0.002640504,0.000043715627,0.00009622856,0.99384284,0.0009842379,0.0020887894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022359027,0.000016631879,0.0004008772,0.00013513687,0.000015298394,0.00017359745,0.0033192663,0.0014591998,0.00026667505,0.9766517,0.017513562,0.000025773448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016086464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018141883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025660925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008296336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004228448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12646425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081478863","doi":"10.1007/s10503-007-9026-2","title":"Constrained Maneuvering: Rhetoric as a Rational Enterprise","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Chrysler (Canada); University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Political communication; Sociology; Communication studies; Political science; Social science; Politics; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.033501667693689216,"score_gpt":0.2837933877003815,"score_spread":0.25029172000669225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081478863","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096337155,0.004511909,0.44699845,0.03674488,0.00039108584,0.00017843898,0.00013847528,0.00022805961,0.4144715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656173,0.0005599748,0.028266994,0.00067513203,0.00018055334,0.00013210459,0.00005308294,0.00010346852,0.004411425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.982117,0.013747896,0.00044039564,0.0012847799,0.0017356799,0.0006742356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9567905,0.0353044,0.0017700597,0.003936836,0.0013682202,0.0008299209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013028551,0.00067187974,0.0010022545,0.0025478157,0.004024936,0.016019592,0.0028769514,0.0070636948,0.0071867346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03356143,0.0006856792,0.0008707947,0.0026483715,0.044492017,0.02287185,0.005477599,0.0052370625,0.0006879495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006760398,0.0000079204265,0.000051163268,0.000019993924,0.000004182753,0.000021917898,0.0019727154,0.00026389078,0.000072283525,0.99563956,0.0002784378,0.0016610258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071070713,0.0000033160886,0.000041592888,0.000022934295,0.0000036131996,0.000019248495,0.0005728513,0.001065917,0.000082167535,0.99497294,0.0032042349,0.000004126561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014772213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096970994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016019592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031620446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033008875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06890237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190206316","doi":"10.1023/a:1014929916547","title":"Speaking Your Mind: Large Inarticulateness Constitutional and Circumstantial","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Utterance; Epistemology; Articulation (sociology); Phenomenon; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03153362823316836,"score_gpt":0.26335414476723884,"score_spread":0.2318205165340705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2190206316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2736987,0.0015319205,0.3118505,0.037792724,0.00049983314,0.00027343878,0.00046717844,0.0009002889,0.37298545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98247683,0.00017621936,0.012562569,0.00065114297,0.00019302077,0.0001252822,0.0000776274,0.00012551575,0.0036117902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793539,0.01102686,0.0010812441,0.0038479352,0.0030917998,0.0015982403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90893376,0.058016792,0.0044761663,0.021950325,0.004408636,0.0022142967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020138778,0.0006147816,0.0020819244,0.002568496,0.006562104,0.008437138,0.00289684,0.0053525344,0.012697864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09573089,0.0012232518,0.0018522473,0.001750036,0.021900916,0.02408696,0.010452605,0.008249351,0.001175359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057645615,0.000023634868,0.00046875744,0.000027317046,0.00002180879,0.00010062666,0.0009787552,0.0002525507,0.00016705974,0.9941301,0.0007604172,0.0030113412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021952208,0.000006228446,0.00023745676,0.000009257605,0.000014958104,0.00006398435,0.00024563968,0.0010361334,0.00014162096,0.99677783,0.0014368122,0.0000082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019770155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001632011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020138778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032851791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023186633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106505334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498181842","doi":"10.1007/s10503-016-9406-6","title":"Analogical Arguments: Inferential Structures and Defeasibility Conditions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Analogy; Defeasible reasoning; Computer science; Similarity (geometry); Inference; Predicate (mathematical logic); Defeasible estate; Argument (complex analysis); Feature (linguistics); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.045432872190207724,"score_gpt":0.2797130563004607,"score_spread":0.234280184110253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498181842","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11281868,0.0032258946,0.6380886,0.030862192,0.0007351378,0.00028680335,0.0007953429,0.00043847505,0.21274883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9059889,0.0011783646,0.08155944,0.0017312424,0.0013207508,0.00041389192,0.0007959979,0.00012750075,0.0068840003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98151934,0.010198683,0.0014505906,0.0025879482,0.0034152204,0.0008282086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8552043,0.122899525,0.0037201678,0.0099261245,0.0065643797,0.0016855168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023481222,0.00123203,0.0018988748,0.0062684733,0.0049043256,0.010037456,0.0038873078,0.009970114,0.01588485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08821804,0.0019494096,0.0033968205,0.004020605,0.020790584,0.03781816,0.0078334985,0.012553666,0.0015570452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003407857,0.000028737923,0.00008411914,0.000047655394,0.000015812846,0.00005263223,0.00022315122,0.00028153593,0.000101519225,0.9970619,0.00043314596,0.0016356396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021082356,0.0000053189574,0.00003516205,0.000018380155,0.000008917906,0.00003987085,0.000050235154,0.0010094149,0.00010288159,0.9981627,0.00054132566,0.0000046522237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000466143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039868217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023481222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035515064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017050202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124182045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782790951","doi":"10.1007/s10503-018-9448-z","title":"Case-to-Case Arguments","year":2018,"lang":"da","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Presentation (obstetrics); Decision theory; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.061689954352459664,"score_gpt":0.29997310287292606,"score_spread":0.2382831485204664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782790951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023377309,0.0054823635,0.34205878,0.115826905,0.0024676665,0.0005385428,0.000340019,0.0001922042,0.5097162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85992754,0.0026218502,0.09787926,0.009838312,0.0021200804,0.0008250997,0.00033084946,0.000105111314,0.026351955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95837617,0.027348498,0.0017900271,0.0035764114,0.007470912,0.0014380693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8484972,0.13273196,0.003642951,0.008148711,0.005689639,0.0012896152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02963541,0.0015736949,0.001886407,0.0051376126,0.005286141,0.009831643,0.0052163634,0.018034242,0.025766047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13761634,0.0010132041,0.0018980516,0.0028496278,0.017332397,0.031165523,0.0073931925,0.008153842,0.002008032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025159601,0.00001887403,0.00007378546,0.000055281304,0.000021111258,0.000147277,0.00030640763,0.00025084103,0.000037797214,0.9943229,0.00214463,0.0025959061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024125424,0.0000049775135,0.000046615398,0.000061103456,0.000012585192,0.00009547361,0.00024091617,0.0011769108,0.00007916098,0.98945487,0.008797288,0.0000060133566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072845846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007978749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02963541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005113826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028792515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15672892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785615823","doi":"10.1007/s10503-018-9450-5","title":"Practical Reasoning Arguments: A Modular Approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Computer science; Argument (complex analysis); Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Modular design; Action (physics); Management science; Programming language","score_opus":0.038621864060251504,"score_gpt":0.3220105740568914,"score_spread":0.2833887099966399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785615823","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004529894,0.0001685863,0.98202455,0.0012150449,0.00004340866,0.00015416766,0.00006145141,0.00036241967,0.011440414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14889638,0.00020930158,0.8441048,0.00020762686,0.00016600107,0.00042124532,0.000194064,0.0002109162,0.0055895685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876859,0.006478566,0.0009859531,0.0012263501,0.0031215507,0.0005016013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97578126,0.014589793,0.0010901088,0.0052082296,0.0024373925,0.00089319976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015686426,0.0014101866,0.0014934692,0.004375345,0.0024461662,0.0085513415,0.0060216375,0.0043943655,0.017530972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03391666,0.002039601,0.005214055,0.0026330147,0.006049382,0.017784555,0.008964371,0.005019192,0.003234999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005511264,0.00010208954,0.0003004003,0.00016240067,0.0000972149,0.00012722226,0.00084834447,0.0056664166,0.0010750405,0.9435819,0.0014147788,0.04656905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046302084,0.000029896042,0.0001481856,0.00008470565,0.00012451719,0.00011955657,0.00013097753,0.05165185,0.0009158127,0.93794966,0.0087769525,0.00002168122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048075343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006390166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017530972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016092109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020182866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0829587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792093414","doi":"10.1007/s10503-018-9456-z","title":"David Hitchcock (2017): On Reasoning and Argument: Essays in Informal Logic and Critical Thinking","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Communication studies; Political communication; Critical thinking; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science; Argumentation theory; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.05187436558278319,"score_gpt":0.31249694906645137,"score_spread":0.2606225834836682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792093414","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037949858,0.1924129,0.013230824,0.7349211,0.022439227,0.000049409286,0.00020913918,0.00009488017,0.032847535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27135843,0.12816224,0.01748851,0.37791145,0.07763219,0.00044866014,0.00050548214,0.000702787,0.12579018],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580127,0.0030205576,0.00012525571,0.00033749692,0.00057424366,0.00014127645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98181087,0.014785703,0.000506126,0.00033436983,0.0018287174,0.00073421304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004847486,0.0015068084,0.0010012906,0.002723866,0.005239058,0.010359407,0.0017235997,0.0107110385,0.010656552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022196008,0.00044793202,0.0004920212,0.00469567,0.012729735,0.01595269,0.004810182,0.012176518,0.0035755306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005042803,0.00005053365,0.00052243436,0.0003282045,0.00002666362,0.00011674993,0.009216375,0.00021909639,0.000107352884,0.35493872,0.6137569,0.02066656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053677737,0.000014169665,0.0009801477,0.0016103459,0.000028174154,0.00015250572,0.0075358343,0.0004204211,0.00039147623,0.4701236,0.51863223,0.00005740767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009307801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014606025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0107110385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004250593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004201623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035649776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973664585","doi":"10.1007/s10503-019-09488-w","title":"Place, Image and Argument: The Physical and Nonphysical Dimensions of a Collective Ethos","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Argument (complex analysis); Political communication; Communication studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Philosophy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.019995401097422535,"score_gpt":0.26508401134247306,"score_spread":0.24508861024505052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973664585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17893188,0.010468264,0.08779438,0.12649964,0.0014032039,0.00010014402,0.00009437565,0.000089063564,0.5946191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989617,0.00048541106,0.004999583,0.0007880998,0.00022745442,0.00005310471,0.00001437323,0.000039375274,0.0037756383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841732,0.012622259,0.00030211802,0.0007918316,0.0015932804,0.00051733415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95405644,0.03894471,0.0020922069,0.002298493,0.0016283483,0.0009797765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017016228,0.0005056956,0.0007196883,0.0034692758,0.007426323,0.018056454,0.0022151815,0.007808423,0.007674204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035865318,0.0005810307,0.0005011389,0.0021180552,0.0805611,0.022488017,0.0066545554,0.00522542,0.00050681515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020875666,0.000019727398,0.000250057,0.00006938258,0.0000071688423,0.00005883854,0.017946005,0.00009854993,0.00011663872,0.97724104,0.0007468716,0.003424762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046390713,0.00002533398,0.0007090672,0.00021338263,0.000014269607,0.00013264288,0.018431466,0.0007066319,0.00024617033,0.95896745,0.020486912,0.000020210187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011587887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012164777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018056454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030074466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003598672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08999151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022807652","doi":"10.1007/s10503-020-09519-x","title":"Annotating Argument Schemes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Premise; Annotation; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03570340326657566,"score_gpt":0.25885827924126475,"score_spread":0.22315487597468908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022807652","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05838424,0.0019987663,0.69265217,0.0038527967,0.0027939365,0.0026974059,0.060587958,0.006247012,0.17078564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16594341,0.0012297748,0.7106174,0.0007033046,0.00039055373,0.0054328125,0.072871834,0.004894735,0.03791612],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804984,0.010339447,0.002594104,0.002766568,0.0033086012,0.0004927822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9204999,0.042906687,0.003577004,0.01722691,0.014917594,0.0008717673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016850853,0.0013731348,0.0009032346,0.016913073,0.0051292763,0.005898767,0.0025966552,0.002343739,0.03071114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075444944,0.0010067093,0.0011521922,0.013394778,0.0028704323,0.00942616,0.007831328,0.003795339,0.011944525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005334894,0.00016121435,0.009878928,0.0050666416,0.00011230119,0.0013267084,0.072745934,0.0034793322,0.029780557,0.3237228,0.16861027,0.3845818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031759493,0.000025680798,0.003930318,0.0010329449,0.000054491138,0.0003971692,0.0060394127,0.0067465915,0.0077148895,0.05571519,0.91823465,0.00007683134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022948245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004510283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03071114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029951362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004704861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102739036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081569111","doi":"10.1007/s10503-020-09528-w","title":"Attack, Defense and Counter-Attack in the Inuit Duel Songs of Ammassalik","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Adversary; False accusation; Action (physics); Rhetorical question; Law; History; Psychology; Literature; Criminology; Political science; Computer security; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.04379366312895286,"score_gpt":0.32571152061051206,"score_spread":0.2819178574815592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081569111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9429775,0.00078351743,0.00065792486,0.0019160579,0.00020689282,0.000021531992,0.000044430453,0.000024000201,0.05336826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948283,0.00009738647,0.0003106661,0.00017420508,0.00002961527,0.00000516287,0.000022813738,0.000016110944,0.0045156004],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987112,0.0006696271,0.000038706745,0.00013303473,0.00019266398,0.00025476533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985146,0.00081343367,0.00018279973,0.00005406921,0.00015714695,0.0002779026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001231688,0.0004775668,0.00047271562,0.0007606967,0.008433293,0.004986058,0.0006827524,0.0019168048,0.0037526477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034587726,0.00022786226,0.00019690377,0.00047188994,0.0052990816,0.0016616912,0.0020949487,0.0028573193,0.0004428829],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004893416,0.00020492153,0.012205952,0.00021768356,0.000055568013,0.0025205747,0.9075078,0.00018342597,0.008954192,0.04857917,0.0053787385,0.013702636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048511858,0.00028915599,0.080125295,0.000271852,0.0000566487,0.0026681356,0.76120055,0.0016270294,0.0018139075,0.008214115,0.14354107,0.0001437156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019797087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06017697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019797087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024744233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073910126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039363682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124279947","doi":"10.1007/s10503-006-9018-7","title":"The Fallaciousness of Threats: Character and Ad Baculum","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Political communication; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.010980686476686666,"score_gpt":0.28641609411378227,"score_spread":0.2754354076370956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124279947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27731517,0.003348714,0.04778942,0.0765302,0.000900672,0.00016592955,0.000096399046,0.00010896079,0.5937445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944325,0.00022780873,0.0021078882,0.000954996,0.00017126054,0.00004875403,0.000014850659,0.000021160815,0.00202078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9638277,0.025509363,0.001336644,0.001946084,0.0061278515,0.0012523794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86809546,0.09882503,0.012242573,0.006939743,0.009918603,0.003978582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023571951,0.00057212624,0.0007502815,0.007358741,0.008603537,0.016643729,0.0024149593,0.010198603,0.006444691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.110793434,0.00063509593,0.0005527165,0.0023816593,0.036165297,0.020284273,0.0077054626,0.0061022392,0.00043573708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058968588,0.00007094353,0.0049335887,0.00012350031,0.00003916559,0.00032445474,0.03013153,0.00021089187,0.00030311834,0.9440786,0.0029476061,0.016777623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003817356,0.00006340003,0.0033080634,0.00029099337,0.000035173332,0.0010324151,0.026835758,0.0024612295,0.00034394985,0.93356156,0.03198815,0.000041168725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060605287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061558007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023571951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030468802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026861504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12466192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206105180","doi":"10.1007/s10503-007-9021-7","title":"Book Review","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Social science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.047168097385020986,"score_gpt":0.31497934462574345,"score_spread":0.26781124724072247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206105180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034761196,0.3950786,0.0012886093,0.042993084,0.04408694,0.00010294575,0.0016812999,0.000335441,0.5140855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027211052,0.18498294,0.00086322136,0.014346192,0.014758312,0.00007693786,0.0014942213,0.00020464508,0.78055245],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925464,0.00010294414,0.000034335422,0.00009439356,0.0004443446,0.00006939062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759066,0.0006220265,0.00012837112,0.0001579558,0.0011561501,0.00034484337],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008861438,0.00046124365,0.0008206684,0.003581703,0.0009780709,0.0048377616,0.001504781,0.0022397053,0.29892388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004956962,0.00029431778,0.0004128658,0.0047345823,0.00082781725,0.0028809044,0.0015422263,0.0022823818,0.19924328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067373135,0.000009090773,0.000024487199,0.00026671548,0.0000025944257,0.00002200004,0.000023468378,0.000028394597,0.000040272585,0.004704171,0.9185947,0.07627737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021289184,0.0000019234583,0.00005100023,0.00023448518,0.000001636065,0.00003748655,0.00001809784,0.000004891156,0.00000984815,0.0007883804,0.99884856,0.0000016028287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042456877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009145074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29892388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020654083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038991596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":1},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245697206","doi":"10.1023/a:1019945119167","title":"The Practice of Argumentative Discussion","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Dialectic; Communication studies; Political communication; Rationality; Sociology; Sociocultural evolution; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.022618110095706166,"score_gpt":0.2943735452023237,"score_spread":0.27175543510661754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245697206","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014849259,0.033611532,0.4583578,0.12717783,0.0037348098,0.00037155364,0.0001603932,0.000653484,0.3610834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7771775,0.0097398115,0.18158957,0.00624555,0.0029170401,0.0017382766,0.00014287964,0.00064496696,0.019804293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8401808,0.14342701,0.0023798286,0.005638103,0.0069532236,0.0014209806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69436604,0.2778858,0.004795282,0.016710702,0.0045903805,0.0016518002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.079158396,0.0017462649,0.0024343934,0.010648632,0.013563074,0.0316752,0.0073937904,0.017488578,0.012285947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11224753,0.0019354941,0.0018891727,0.0074926843,0.12753579,0.042066317,0.011403116,0.015055167,0.0027648716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010433845,0.000010072654,0.00004672144,0.00012884909,0.000011971536,0.00003356655,0.010662667,0.00014495336,0.000042592197,0.98238015,0.0019386353,0.004589404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024074126,0.0000061774604,0.000041167066,0.00030806536,0.000007135496,0.000063008054,0.0022450793,0.00058644667,0.00015157154,0.9571203,0.039437465,0.000009567746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013968592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012578748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079158396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008085967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070497026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4186346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248259855","doi":"10.1023/a:1011156918137","title":"Emotional Messages","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.0442418674709357,"score_gpt":0.3702571211262045,"score_spread":0.32601525365526884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248259855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074744985,0.0007619846,0.021209138,0.009182856,0.001650804,0.00022076054,0.0005490458,0.0005849827,0.8910956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7872445,0.00058799423,0.008175533,0.004016568,0.00124205,0.00027053538,0.00071429485,0.00032499532,0.19742356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983032,0.00069390394,0.00007775066,0.00015129906,0.0006121065,0.00016185244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947838,0.0026069323,0.0005642819,0.000437815,0.001303918,0.00030334512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00116493,0.00062557915,0.00021543878,0.0009422263,0.0010452286,0.0029748275,0.00043620568,0.0020428677,0.044829424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013641815,0.00016941382,0.0002747246,0.0003926329,0.0007948652,0.0023594114,0.0016439589,0.0020923256,0.01068756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009913302,0.0006160315,0.009279493,0.0010914735,0.000091862436,0.0013237458,0.02435688,0.000745641,0.03989549,0.5114915,0.111347,0.2987696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015124648,0.0004840889,0.026775386,0.00078962627,0.0002023145,0.0020732835,0.010977747,0.0046206494,0.023518158,0.16753843,0.7627473,0.00012174213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015548474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015536619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044829424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005787955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028679665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1499694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318982896","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09603-y","title":"Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Argument (complex analysis); Communication studies; Economic Justice; Sociology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Positive economics; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.16370481807376638,"score_gpt":0.32816689764985746,"score_spread":0.16446207957609107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318982896","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19106467,0.010532886,0.21869175,0.3481959,0.0016967752,0.00024553324,0.0003582458,0.00024139129,0.22897278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793363,0.0008103012,0.01374701,0.0029094412,0.0006032672,0.00017159617,0.00006999561,0.00008185477,0.0022702368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90880495,0.05726349,0.0051969243,0.010500819,0.014017706,0.0042159767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65704584,0.28350776,0.016640205,0.026518252,0.0130683165,0.0032196885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09331504,0.0007849606,0.002874255,0.0079142405,0.013508592,0.019418065,0.004660442,0.014707655,0.007584222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2221335,0.0011093192,0.0013543075,0.005335474,0.08474559,0.032374687,0.01276829,0.013241402,0.00067866826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022313088,0.000019610294,0.00056722277,0.000055559765,0.000029084553,0.00007189406,0.004681539,0.00018992406,0.000039691327,0.98992187,0.0010178991,0.0033833839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011896862,0.0000018036551,0.00006909401,0.00004392381,0.0000050862277,0.000018868059,0.000749377,0.00028236402,0.000036298483,0.9973574,0.0014198758,0.0000038495114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030987759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024710523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09331504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009316383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009103575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49350303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319870956","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09607-8","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on Fallacies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Political communication; Communication studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Philosophy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.019407541881785773,"score_gpt":0.27604805601261884,"score_spread":0.25664051413083305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319870956","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036620922,0.051586885,0.007090096,0.085726745,0.8234478,0.00006067508,0.0003946763,0.00025637614,0.031070473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032102573,0.025290895,0.0021118736,0.019369679,0.8912201,0.00010872673,0.0007529238,0.00050400314,0.057431567],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967548,0.00084482244,0.00039710998,0.00059861084,0.0011504486,0.00025421145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822349,0.009873598,0.0010198529,0.0011027686,0.003932333,0.0018365581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039008306,0.0021458697,0.003238568,0.0059805964,0.0031876082,0.0110275,0.0023934222,0.0071718586,0.06371941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017016666,0.0008516569,0.0021053024,0.004006788,0.0029987795,0.009641881,0.0049158162,0.012037844,0.027170159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021523658,0.000024333345,0.00006759025,0.00024807092,0.000012398578,0.000049558286,0.000059573315,0.000089678666,0.0001267229,0.007969286,0.9657485,0.025582964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007629858,0.000020577585,0.00020617589,0.00039742942,0.000011634887,0.00014092971,0.000060073435,0.00018093387,0.000059272006,0.009625166,0.98927504,0.000015282545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009898692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001961149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06371941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022331232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023337486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21316266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319871818","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09606-9","title":"Committing Fallacies and the Appearance Condition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.048006236654045804,"score_gpt":0.28564047049037,"score_spread":0.2376342338363242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319871818","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13828737,0.0015962889,0.5071589,0.07500176,0.0012669035,0.00030893163,0.00041002032,0.00070960313,0.27526024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92890525,0.0004344369,0.054930333,0.002217724,0.0006161708,0.0003799432,0.00022772886,0.00022945632,0.012058937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96520543,0.018810354,0.0023166924,0.005313803,0.0054626153,0.002891107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7972608,0.1581137,0.006950735,0.022428604,0.011702885,0.0035432694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028129006,0.00088630343,0.0023300769,0.0033037786,0.009019602,0.01114154,0.004641456,0.016890327,0.01737463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20349835,0.0015628559,0.002232777,0.0024528038,0.029424587,0.025951019,0.012229179,0.018809767,0.0016977644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027220754,0.000021699629,0.0002528339,0.000036130696,0.0000083116765,0.00009496012,0.0006147926,0.0003136963,0.00006651349,0.9949935,0.00091171416,0.002658556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021964683,0.000004904668,0.000041858395,0.000025928079,0.000006204103,0.000060210816,0.00012812894,0.0012800742,0.00007747482,0.99701524,0.0013315249,0.00000645766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020844908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013588293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028129006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004126801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038930818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14876223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319985130","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09600-1","title":"Textbook Treatments of Fallacies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Philosophy; Epistemology; Section (typography); Literature; Classics; History; Art; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04047829285631277,"score_gpt":0.37423643125720885,"score_spread":0.3337581384008961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319985130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005123227,0.02730849,0.10092068,0.03896511,0.002320206,0.00006857763,0.0003477212,0.00029684973,0.82464916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6270682,0.024842203,0.070176795,0.013397504,0.0057460503,0.00062575174,0.0009657869,0.00047735113,0.25670034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969024,0.0017037892,0.0001923277,0.000257412,0.0007593828,0.00018468619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959045,0.0026145128,0.000318752,0.00048545597,0.00057477056,0.000102007296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002440036,0.00094847265,0.0007156085,0.005060822,0.0028865368,0.0052671814,0.0022410727,0.0060130702,0.020683123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010560165,0.0006276162,0.00077444024,0.005380938,0.011154082,0.0074478863,0.0025234648,0.006010611,0.0050337412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026803086,0.00000419637,0.000021974032,0.000034918816,0.0000020582647,0.000010958694,0.00021432001,0.00010306789,0.000014996768,0.98660916,0.008480512,0.0045011663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050041904,0.0000027170777,0.000053950094,0.00011859048,0.0000037717207,0.00006250262,0.000097019736,0.00036159897,0.00003987009,0.9379098,0.061341316,0.000003898862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015120339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015466758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020683123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004633429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018177675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06919187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360980452","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09609-6","title":"Fallacies and Their Place in the Foundations of Science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Mathematical proof; Philosophy; Deductive reasoning; Inductive reasoning; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06861749761720014,"score_gpt":0.27477879710224934,"score_spread":0.2061612994850492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360980452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15889654,0.018980661,0.17881013,0.080803536,0.0010679284,0.00009323422,0.00022364118,0.00027256183,0.56085175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98605496,0.0011012948,0.008833153,0.00042447622,0.00020793971,0.00004394703,0.000041299223,0.000052740314,0.0032401728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98255426,0.013481406,0.0005939097,0.0011033796,0.00151868,0.00074824056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9344975,0.05448496,0.0027932734,0.004028567,0.0028701527,0.0013256695],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015717218,0.0005164603,0.0013087846,0.007447079,0.0115011865,0.017329156,0.0025827375,0.008493219,0.0075642793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0491773,0.0010035632,0.00075544417,0.005021312,0.0630804,0.022743227,0.0070264884,0.009286404,0.0005459074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007130646,0.000003950774,0.00010441658,0.000013947685,0.0000027769186,0.000019844578,0.0028803204,0.0001073924,0.000019408668,0.9952808,0.0002019997,0.0013580443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051534075,0.0000030968945,0.00006794468,0.00003504922,0.0000027558356,0.000019694082,0.0008384958,0.0003080018,0.00002523788,0.99511814,0.0035736756,0.0000028030806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038852072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036872504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9884988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007990209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047349236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0831216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360985377","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09604-x","title":"Teaching the Fallacies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Communication studies; Political communication; Sociology; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Engineering; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.050463391144813005,"score_gpt":0.272851442163362,"score_spread":0.22238805101854897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360985377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02994562,0.006479237,0.08001764,0.066138074,0.0021337778,0.000057894158,0.00010801869,0.00047609612,0.8146436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8596481,0.002920727,0.02470563,0.0035696905,0.0006847482,0.00009074887,0.00012123372,0.0004443753,0.107814714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948643,0.0033677411,0.00011578106,0.00055728713,0.00080238946,0.00029256527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932334,0.0047658146,0.00037674207,0.0006461659,0.000579173,0.00039866532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004831778,0.000787179,0.0004922267,0.001661908,0.005271526,0.008443299,0.0015705887,0.0034404884,0.022314392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01588576,0.00043269372,0.0004752369,0.0010893714,0.0148332305,0.011847118,0.0048879907,0.007560532,0.0039097858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001674803,0.000038070582,0.00022606587,0.00006813339,0.0000056440276,0.000053459848,0.0083481325,0.00026939827,0.0001737476,0.9432326,0.019252026,0.028315933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011840338,0.00001135145,0.00013406647,0.00025583484,0.0000072932216,0.0000890799,0.0034316091,0.0008915988,0.0004475704,0.8087477,0.18596469,0.0000072438816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013744399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025968035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022314392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046714083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033159493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074649096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400700211","doi":"10.1007/s10503-024-09635-y","title":"Remembering Tony Blair (1941–2024)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.026399392426038983,"score_gpt":0.3374100325706624,"score_spread":0.3110106401446234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400700211","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006132041,0.124257326,0.00026319895,0.6916482,0.17397016,0.000006186123,0.00008792351,0.000018692414,0.009135033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032587927,0.05748327,0.0005240314,0.5434091,0.21505222,0.00005805017,0.00009189703,0.00019505652,0.15059847],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648225,0.0011797915,0.0001987567,0.00086896017,0.0009271866,0.0003430592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935666,0.00296124,0.00059856725,0.0002737366,0.0014438896,0.0011558853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003844886,0.0013593873,0.0012110658,0.002060638,0.0060914764,0.0093944175,0.0011154892,0.011951528,0.008427166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018710667,0.0005682934,0.00068671507,0.0019098195,0.008088785,0.010382198,0.0038469653,0.019946616,0.004893222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027610555,0.000009026302,0.00013427678,0.00007418991,0.000013202436,0.00012954569,0.001193275,0.000025778167,0.000050111634,0.011057913,0.97970873,0.007576239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005579103,0.000004996013,0.0002944212,0.00030361535,0.0000050540757,0.00010383783,0.000615237,0.00001704887,0.000059219827,0.0029639057,0.99560827,0.000018653922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01784115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030933121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01784115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006368188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033286156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046204686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410540562","doi":"10.1007/s10503-025-09656-1","title":"Chinese Argument from Qi 氣 and the Place of Ethos in the Kisceral Mode","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Argument (complex analysis); Political communication; Communication studies; Epistemology; Mode (computer interface); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics; Social science; Computer science; Politics; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.011767975455567925,"score_gpt":0.3369376238112258,"score_spread":0.32516964835565787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410540562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1754791,0.0026585073,0.017023878,0.017790794,0.0003391883,0.000119418706,0.000071894036,0.000065872904,0.78645134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98879725,0.00023468536,0.0012553065,0.0004701783,0.00008538706,0.000041231775,0.000011698702,0.000013645379,0.0090906145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99556017,0.0026260696,0.00018392497,0.0004667355,0.0006243316,0.00053868705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969764,0.0017214093,0.00024482905,0.00040768416,0.0004146251,0.00023507599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067847925,0.00050798216,0.00067751703,0.0029017269,0.0076627377,0.005568578,0.0013277815,0.002809493,0.0053760554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006384856,0.00034021065,0.0004745407,0.002606529,0.032993034,0.005738933,0.003137725,0.00357271,0.00033915674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016581813,0.0000057991324,0.0001948353,0.00003447684,0.000005664807,0.00005478805,0.005983751,0.000093155315,0.00008089084,0.991276,0.00038221298,0.0018717885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077662226,0.000050929117,0.002585129,0.00013535983,0.00004375534,0.00012683167,0.0045505674,0.0024435152,0.0005910589,0.9515195,0.03783356,0.000042198935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008142874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007189689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009849433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009849433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006019258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07146293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412817136","doi":"10.1007/s10503-025-09669-w","title":"“Deliberative Context” Is not the Whole Story of Deliberative Reasoning: the Site C Case of Disagreement Management in Indigenous Consultations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Political communication; Epistemology; Sociology; Communication studies; Political science; Deliberative democracy; Social science; Public relations; Geography; Politics; Philosophy; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.025995604315173247,"score_gpt":0.31472984365467166,"score_spread":0.28873423933949843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412817136","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36567813,0.0011027028,0.042944085,0.090469405,0.00046690085,0.0003176323,0.00007891434,0.0002188652,0.49872345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98606086,0.00011634722,0.0046135345,0.0012029478,0.00005207232,0.00011654023,0.000009590055,0.000069759124,0.007758406],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9339538,0.05638201,0.0008562291,0.0016187065,0.003583006,0.0036062142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9115882,0.078005895,0.0021986195,0.003100132,0.002163099,0.0029440233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0367202,0.0005987139,0.00096766656,0.0025191945,0.040577944,0.01970894,0.0044119833,0.020357126,0.0073803016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06065027,0.00088796363,0.0010469217,0.0034934643,0.06537204,0.017357128,0.0152666755,0.014300674,0.00086067716],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007176021,0.000035492998,0.00061651674,0.00010825718,0.000017920473,0.0051914514,0.54815066,0.0005163558,0.00039344738,0.43768758,0.0029553068,0.004255291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011872328,0.0000593117,0.0013006025,0.00050349266,0.000047442667,0.0027436155,0.6387173,0.0026855245,0.0009859976,0.26165822,0.091063365,0.00011639011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03836792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038334776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9616321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01139272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012615437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1941973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}