{"meta":{"query_hash":"0f04f8ec0c3d","filters":{"venue":"Argumentation"},"cohort_total":44,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":44,"exported":44,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0f04f8ec0c3d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Argumentation"},"results":[{"id":"W141175123","doi":"10.1023/a:1007837321284","title":"Slippery Slopes and Collapsing Taboos","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.033965186975042326,"score_gpt":0.25552911910522963,"score_spread":0.2215639321301873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W141175123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8390789,0.00030816827,0.000022639078,0.00072345015,0.0003984039,0.00013029005,0.000008775942,0.000048098438,0.15928125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740795,0.00015958596,0.0002153821,0.001348067,0.00034939748,0.000011103147,0.000026548303,0.000009273312,0.023801146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995797,0.000035254314,0.000109426255,0.00010843735,0.00007071968,0.00009640861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981004,0.000044502583,0.000030951058,0.00006000013,0.00002990394,0.00002463059],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000097610246,0.00006198068,0.000076438904,0.000025180501,0.00025348816,0.00009692554,0.000028112067,0.000022907072,0.0017008312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000549921,0.00005802863,0.000019607294,0.00001360326,0.00014729344,0.00023311503,0.00000532831,0.000053208103,0.00012884356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005795325,0.00011577014,0.0015254876,0.00009679245,0.00010276344,0.0000061022024,0.20408826,0.000019625279,0.0017479318,0.5418715,0.007792117,0.24257572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007156545,0.0001097281,0.0018423344,0.000035551708,0.000079264675,0.000004796421,0.0117788315,0.00010817769,0.0014189003,0.018177304,0.9654828,0.0002467069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014387167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002855661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95769066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009353519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010034194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579722416","doi":"10.1023/a:1012021017836","title":"Walton's Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning: A Critique and Development","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Political communication; Epistemology; Communication studies; Inference; Relation (database); Deductive reasoning; Informal logic; Computer science; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.026188800740009566,"score_gpt":0.31690998357597305,"score_spread":0.2907211828359635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579722416","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29217064,0.00008320327,0.70635986,0.0003570304,0.00017058174,0.0006022438,0.000001444947,0.00007834194,0.00017663713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8600346,0.000053074935,0.13882397,0.00024779208,0.000055795186,0.00029327918,0.00006096159,0.000009414037,0.0004210986],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990046,0.000048541886,0.00025287547,0.00032742528,0.00018519135,0.00018133919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994935,0.00006972825,0.00014244003,0.0001341574,0.000097324344,0.00006284806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027438154,0.000116127514,0.00010092319,0.00009123346,0.00021578622,0.00015618083,0.000119057055,0.000044458167,0.000012206111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034943874,0.00011732042,0.000021999705,0.00010761549,0.00001239743,0.00090783386,0.000038851173,0.000035104018,0.000017434046],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001900566,0.0005233777,0.09388237,0.00038038273,0.00025959942,0.000014212391,0.04650838,0.0001719332,0.038610764,0.19217943,0.003912956,0.62336653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010178626,0.0006354797,0.3389551,0.00043375988,0.0000709842,0.000090184956,0.0030410562,0.17843221,0.2944628,0.0060745603,0.1659729,0.0016523312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034108125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023068153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6217142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009130838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041959196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4784188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1636107842","doi":"10.1023/a:1007786123170","title":"Antoine Arnauld (1612--1694)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Neurology and Historical Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.02560020867419899,"score_gpt":0.26283795631305384,"score_spread":0.23723774763885486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1636107842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9421577,0.000053011026,0.00003144949,0.0016925993,0.00024537023,0.00009179186,0.0000023454268,0.00008141001,0.055644363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989594,0.00019590904,0.000044163917,0.0033635066,0.000057502897,0.0000128809725,0.0000015640366,0.000005040124,0.006725465],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994481,0.000044455395,0.0000951888,0.00018428995,0.000103942315,0.00012400089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998005,0.00006762541,0.00002439041,0.00007450709,0.000005421953,0.000027580558],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003245778,0.0000572779,0.000060476785,0.000022713668,0.00020969915,0.000010719356,0.00006417164,0.000021975537,0.0014474131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039461887,0.000052497915,0.000021359005,0.00011645662,0.00005591369,0.00011705538,0.000009365795,0.00006543471,0.0013018597],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003268766,0.00046375676,0.009296577,0.000015010937,0.000013622299,0.00012459833,0.0017492169,0.0001266698,0.6957886,0.013747594,0.028787758,0.24955967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013470178,0.00046808273,0.056590244,0.000005955691,0.000029002875,0.000041184783,0.000029584897,0.00020552926,0.34704766,0.009193497,0.58472276,0.00031947248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017188131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006423492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.555935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022345883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000035134176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W183851629","doi":"10.1023/a:1014991300192","title":"Effing the Ineffable: The Logocentric Fallacy in Argumentation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Ambiguity; Focus (optics); Fallacy; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.041503125159252585,"score_gpt":0.3190587741036113,"score_spread":0.2775556489443587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W183851629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9341609,0.0008623483,0.00007191281,0.023551855,0.00060672156,0.00055175717,0.0000013298481,0.000034959572,0.04015824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965081,0.0004455292,0.000033028973,0.00094642915,0.00019821536,0.000090971844,0.0000056180884,0.000004048763,0.0017680575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989289,0.00033837615,0.00016238172,0.00011746099,0.00026754977,0.00018535348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931234,0.00045023166,0.00008401614,0.000087785746,0.000044616263,0.000020986288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007660454,0.0000646783,0.000053446714,0.000042942138,0.00093409704,0.000084804466,0.0001687438,0.000024073932,0.00059030444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020453687,0.00004071556,0.000026535394,0.00058407657,0.00012913068,0.0002559445,0.000018753428,0.0000887634,0.000166745],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016333906,0.0003768211,0.16973735,0.0000132671985,0.000056138466,0.0000021380272,0.3050864,0.00064060895,0.00012085245,0.4386164,0.016942505,0.068391174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017616693,0.00009711521,0.41589236,0.000079017125,0.000100547135,0.0000038143623,0.3939414,0.0011018411,0.00042127143,0.09312242,0.0929449,0.0005336316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051976735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007885606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34549397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013266408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001887328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71844137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W188319134","doi":"10.1023/a:1019901304146","title":"Manifest Rationality Reconsidered: Reply to my Fellow Symposiasts","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Rationality; Focus (optics); Political communication; Communication studies; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Social science; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07180288928727523,"score_gpt":0.258824402512435,"score_spread":0.18702151322515975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W188319134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5968077,0.00010572244,0.00017611356,0.042959817,0.002488179,0.0006484559,0.00003972531,0.00018033564,0.3565939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98388886,0.000011949524,0.00038501047,0.0069992226,0.00073351694,0.00007817323,0.000082505634,0.000011322762,0.0078094527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920315,0.000053953285,0.00024502835,0.00020080278,0.00016203937,0.00013500298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995361,0.000063100924,0.000085698994,0.00017417262,0.00007654541,0.00006436743],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013946969,0.00009626094,0.000080675636,0.00007464735,0.00033010665,0.0001812337,0.00007289988,0.000019675008,0.0075255022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000391968,0.00009967468,0.00003552108,0.000040367988,0.00004183367,0.00054264895,0.0000136947,0.000054825938,0.002134995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016726932,0.00025690472,0.00076857227,0.00003411197,0.000043777232,0.0000032902308,0.1044462,0.00004418078,0.00062140636,0.7036178,0.18127649,0.008870546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014243717,0.00044701208,0.014370864,0.00014382049,0.00012801883,0.000042360407,0.012259699,0.0013091142,0.0049764,0.24956991,0.7142292,0.0010992354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014005975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001284792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5329527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064662156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009896492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99864197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189468606","doi":"10.1023/a:1019993002329","title":"Johnson on the Metaphysics of Argument","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.09520054357920177,"score_gpt":0.24600124407950533,"score_spread":0.15080070050030356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189468606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48350647,0.00017251876,0.00004520866,0.020176997,0.0005034186,0.00030505875,0.000021260581,0.000073418945,0.49519563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977205,0.000051726678,0.000008730316,0.0015667335,0.0001559704,0.000013681746,0.000003862702,0.000008845352,0.00046994057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999503,0.000049519804,0.00012298916,0.00007507581,0.00017884871,0.00007053552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996023,0.00015053067,0.000071987386,0.00012071433,0.00003884673,0.000015573904],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015172176,0.000057717374,0.00006509842,0.000025237892,0.00010656811,0.0000321661,0.000074658754,0.000014142112,0.0019467537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017010836,0.000035970475,0.000051526546,0.00002200046,0.00012567558,0.000072357405,0.000010274181,0.00008417468,0.00014412601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043456557,0.000084544714,0.0000029258422,0.000004838708,0.000023314904,2.020325e-7,0.006648478,0.0000058340497,0.00022564692,0.9904896,0.0006050958,0.0019051566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018424814,0.00013156734,0.00005201002,0.000017579534,0.00002526438,1.1746333e-7,0.00071069464,0.000411196,0.0056202426,0.9507328,0.04204168,0.00007259302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022892458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009687218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51421404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011304251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019951544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964844782","doi":"10.1007/s10503-014-9335-1","title":"Challenges and Remedies for Identifying and Classifying Argumentation Schemes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialogical self; Coding (social sciences); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Curriculum; Process (computing); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Social science","score_opus":0.18147610861114416,"score_gpt":0.44384865776279664,"score_spread":0.2623725491516525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964844782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8880046,0.0016494674,0.10275135,0.0010101136,0.0005338308,0.0002718911,0.0000010462231,0.00009256466,0.005685119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662443,0.00013519105,0.032634314,0.00020958828,0.00015270156,0.00008534845,0.000023255836,0.000017690685,0.00049765786],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894464,0.00035245784,0.00017941925,0.00027976368,0.00008683149,0.0001569105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993065,0.00039400038,0.00013190789,0.00009180536,0.000047584792,0.00002822108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015703216,0.000101968544,0.00012141529,0.00011382367,0.00021613916,0.00004687071,0.00003391567,0.000057120113,0.00002027465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020603121,0.00010173595,0.000017115324,0.000047248937,0.000057702127,0.00017416893,0.000017633225,0.00010703734,0.0000072434477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047253794,0.000023809975,0.007948035,0.000101801634,0.000061850245,2.570097e-7,0.02624194,7.108042e-7,0.015882213,0.09193315,0.00016575793,0.85759324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034706339,0.00048516114,0.9026907,0.00014880497,0.00010948279,0.000018393894,0.025868692,0.00094430085,0.0059916168,0.032676697,0.027161341,0.00043417435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013767269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000073153096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89474267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019183759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000030569995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41486716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977123674","doi":"10.1007/s10503-015-9356-4","title":"A Meta-Level Approach to the Problem of Defining ‘Critical Thinking’","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Critical thinking; Term (time); Computer science; Management science; Strengths and weaknesses; Position (finance); Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.2302165209402242,"score_gpt":0.39378634714610733,"score_spread":0.16356982620588312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977123674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056315254,0.0005609634,0.10895214,0.17870976,0.0012432432,0.0018509707,0.000025149331,0.00024432433,0.6520982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81016564,0.0000038360968,0.18643129,0.0024196606,0.00005475914,0.00010581474,0.000011422706,0.000005170624,0.0008023852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875337,0.00020407027,0.00018660298,0.00012645614,0.0005685977,0.00016093251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938345,0.0001827862,0.000034684832,0.000083531086,0.00019506115,0.00012049105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019446369,0.000056030738,0.000100683304,0.00003695517,0.0002844385,0.00007231716,0.00018323863,0.000031838925,0.000056482117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003495807,0.000039312927,0.00004197166,0.00025906952,0.00010089991,0.00012871662,0.000030461277,0.00006302699,0.000109925575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033365686,0.000080229715,0.00032831763,0.0000059361246,0.00005111748,7.661382e-8,0.15258504,0.000022206465,0.0000065249865,0.8416341,0.0033854574,0.001897659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048492747,0.00011330291,0.0032148417,0.000037931786,0.0006434518,0.0000025137072,0.21657279,0.00008456908,0.00060778664,0.611417,0.16647224,0.0003486471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037967853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007019747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7538504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007293145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023879539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21876997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979312761","doi":"10.1007/s10503-012-9272-9","title":"The Burden of Criticism: Consequences of Taking a Critical Stance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Criticism; Explication; Epistemology; Dialectic; Normative; Critical appraisal; Critical thinking; Adversary; Critical theory; Presupposition; Negation; Critical thought; Disinformation; Argumentative; Obligation; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.04173456905127048,"score_gpt":0.3358983056179288,"score_spread":0.29416373656665834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979312761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5383674,0.000981602,0.45574453,0.0023183348,0.0010510521,0.00024289863,0.0000045658926,0.000030916173,0.0012587226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934448,0.000013926614,0.0064014792,0.000031330004,0.000059375903,0.000008967393,7.469173e-7,0.000001960979,0.00003743001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992661,0.000083040424,0.00023533056,0.00007439347,0.0002171565,0.00012398361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992605,0.0003136136,0.00016296985,0.00014389477,0.0000930013,0.000026024523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039252642,0.000041647694,0.00006921783,0.000025033545,0.00008078591,0.000025861533,0.00016693391,0.000017285402,0.000011780889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014136614,0.000030924664,0.00002346825,0.000099315934,0.00008544949,0.00047990453,0.000023870085,0.000024036879,0.000005829892],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075320077,0.000055604258,0.007271179,0.00010523443,0.000020261696,5.2141996e-7,0.012114303,0.000063610074,0.19475085,0.77487606,0.0002567192,0.010478139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008087715,0.00019440724,0.04824192,0.0002836892,0.000038654114,0.000018776029,0.0058320276,0.03475597,0.89141667,0.016186582,0.0019090843,0.00031342974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015449164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036270594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75868946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016568732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017104576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12610713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982432424","doi":"10.1007/s10503-011-9224-9","title":"Character and Knowledge: Learning from the Speech of Experts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Pathos; Ethos; Character (mathematics); Logos Bible Software; Epistemology; Psychology; Social knowledge; Sociology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13704088616481985,"score_gpt":0.2752474300216571,"score_spread":0.13820654385683723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982432424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96175545,0.000261078,0.000023535085,0.00012016263,0.00035659625,0.0000698439,0.0000030476958,0.000013432616,0.03739687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968723,0.00005433115,0.00008651968,0.00017744479,0.00024123535,0.0000057159386,0.000019792604,0.000005564676,0.002537086],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996526,0.00006907105,0.00010238165,0.00007541745,0.00004494433,0.000055579832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970466,0.00010010438,0.000071947215,0.00006343522,0.00004836506,0.000011495847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011967629,0.000046448316,0.00006681742,0.000012726415,0.00012104276,0.000018644023,0.00004019982,0.000019960711,0.0005075323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015267793,0.000032180345,0.000020786862,0.0000075653825,0.0001572356,0.00012111373,0.000015428333,0.000063726264,0.000026810974],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018589575,0.00006819628,0.014741135,0.000016511076,0.00005323998,7.020447e-7,0.86315256,7.75385e-8,0.0025535005,0.09870916,0.0006881714,0.019998172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020818638,0.00055296556,0.22264521,0.0001850329,0.0003259158,0.000004105873,0.27041945,0.00017481911,0.07855284,0.09275351,0.33167183,0.0006324616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070191245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005012765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5927331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004019979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000070535466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5557123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984962811","doi":"10.1007/s10503-004-2071-1","title":"Begging the Question in Arguments Based on Testimony","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Begging; Argumentation theory; Sequence (biology); Epistemology; Law; Fallacy; Witness; Point (geometry); Testimonial; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics; Advertising","score_opus":0.016594620141704063,"score_gpt":0.2950368186882093,"score_spread":0.27844219854650526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984962811","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4760931,0.000038576534,0.51017386,0.009794707,0.0005718743,0.00076993526,0.0000013451546,0.00017485108,0.0023817553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901982,0.0000026717692,0.008335734,0.001220487,0.000067761364,0.000047952704,0.000010273598,0.0000049159644,0.00011199737],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906296,0.00012256634,0.00020456723,0.00020846009,0.00026268628,0.00013874771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952114,0.000092964525,0.00010084601,0.000236946,0.000022147216,0.000025983762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004584547,0.00008199359,0.00005920138,0.00011237381,0.00010451462,0.00010124766,0.00020339507,0.000027062273,0.00001738011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030352478,0.00006325726,0.000022804506,0.00022577426,0.000007950904,0.00051112595,0.000019054518,0.00006689136,0.00014796051],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004045498,0.00082202716,0.20475115,0.00004115277,0.000020206411,0.000009934674,0.0055615655,0.24486811,0.013389171,0.05038904,0.003080482,0.4770267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005590339,0.000040814804,0.1710195,0.00004641317,0.0000022228753,7.918762e-7,0.000021959586,0.8231077,0.004059848,0.00025940608,0.00079911534,0.000083190236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011826059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007754883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5782396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015330236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001781842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25795564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987103036","doi":"10.1007/s10503-005-4414-y","title":"The Toulmin Model Today: Introduction to the Special Issue on Contemporary Work using Stephen Edelston Toulmin’s Layout of Arguments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Work (physics); Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Mathematical economics; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Engineering; Social science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.050760762478954675,"score_gpt":0.37433544315000766,"score_spread":0.323574680671053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987103036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8587513,0.00010623523,0.0015681147,0.10644341,0.0024450049,0.0013646492,0.000021274556,0.00005507545,0.029244965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98339486,0.000028226734,0.00096723274,0.001391701,0.011955916,0.000039824587,0.000016034845,0.0000140599295,0.0021921254],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818134,0.00037052223,0.00036417277,0.00025853937,0.00052352727,0.00030190145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990271,0.0003736749,0.00014086517,0.00025225096,0.000121940284,0.0000842099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010810492,0.00011803767,0.00014736135,0.000045113684,0.00071588065,0.00007529103,0.00028100703,0.00009986875,0.00019271039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042168846,0.000085613334,0.00006360733,0.00025238414,0.0003048799,0.00023819684,0.000052969976,0.00014922985,0.000106778985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086267455,0.0004278359,0.0022035753,0.000014226947,0.00012552661,0.0000021799258,0.19237582,0.035783447,0.0021696163,0.18279217,0.376669,0.20657393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010868355,0.0002845976,0.0018174874,0.00006381265,0.000091402355,0.0000011347996,0.06776275,0.005555099,0.0042032613,0.01490878,0.90374833,0.00047649344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061426975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52707934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040607917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011934468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55060476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999134038","doi":"10.1007/s10503-008-9110-2","title":"Reasoning from Classifications and Definitions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Epistemology; Informal logic; Argument map; Political communication; Communication studies; Computer science; Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Politics; Machine learning; Law","score_opus":0.08011628943606784,"score_gpt":0.2550434387325153,"score_spread":0.17492714929644743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999134038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56632876,0.00006360632,0.4314941,0.0004659685,0.00013765781,0.00009704012,0.000005051832,0.000082336264,0.0013255021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9552668,0.00009863783,0.04431683,0.00012661517,0.00003357666,0.000025154186,0.000049057664,0.0000030080396,0.00008033511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949676,0.000035822664,0.000123918,0.00016840086,0.000105059924,0.00007003363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996584,0.000055125987,0.00006711074,0.00015395778,0.000028059148,0.000037327143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000050924675,0.000047652415,0.000046592653,0.00004583265,0.0002577363,0.000047431262,0.00007934051,0.000022152777,0.000017374261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016478818,0.000048899234,0.000014228807,0.00011059224,0.000016045446,0.00048717603,0.000021530177,0.00003017938,0.00007922313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062819495,0.00024325743,0.2606645,0.000015205727,0.00006168696,0.000015256295,0.023505507,0.00012817484,0.047875408,0.6333664,0.00630767,0.027810672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043224145,0.000019164914,0.9530538,0.00001685219,0.000007714987,0.000016863758,0.00016535155,0.038790286,0.0024144438,0.0039302995,0.0010271,0.00012588338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019519193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019672307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6923893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022491962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015254714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19940528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003635366","doi":"10.1007/s10503-011-9233-8","title":"Petitioning the King: The Case of Provincial Printers in Eighteenth-Century France","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Context (archaeology); Narrative; Argumentative; Government (linguistics); Competition (biology); Character (mathematics); Censorship; Law; Sociology; Political science; Literature; History; Art; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.033486149924841696,"score_gpt":0.25422875654256394,"score_spread":0.22074260661772224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003635366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9219528,0.00013256398,0.000055212437,0.00017462652,0.00028039518,0.00015282563,0.000008259443,0.0000073193783,0.07723601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99939054,0.000030661282,0.000030871804,0.00011537004,0.00021791745,0.000015201988,0.0000066540856,0.0000038604576,0.00018891461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961936,0.000030827072,0.0001486592,0.00006915021,0.00006382883,0.00006816744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973166,0.000028333956,0.0000934636,0.00009121239,0.000046921967,0.000008378694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013123729,0.000044547032,0.000049832244,0.000033084816,0.00017087373,0.000040537798,0.0000685145,0.000007770534,0.0007472609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018520035,0.000025064388,0.00003717701,0.00002535025,0.00010251406,0.00006679904,0.000015456264,0.000045943634,0.000007143569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011603032,0.00007791817,0.0047392016,0.000011156919,0.00003258451,0.00003222917,0.080641195,0.000014911394,0.000023515384,0.9124264,0.000099259574,0.0018900095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004384797,0.0005812784,0.06023953,0.00046746887,0.001277684,0.00009178992,0.69302464,0.012488243,0.0077403365,0.0575443,0.1609084,0.0012515457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004211834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004986145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8548821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010951936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001111376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8181983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011562498","doi":"10.1007/s10503-011-9205-z","title":"Critical Inquiry: Considering the Context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Dialectic; Critical thinking; Context (archaeology); Relevance (law); Sociology; Discipline; Argument (complex analysis); Variety (cybernetics); Politics; Critical systems thinking; Communication studies; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1333740345554744,"score_gpt":0.3935709428632236,"score_spread":0.2601969083077492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011562498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6684,0.00014624473,0.004548734,0.05293555,0.004427409,0.00049319095,0.0000010785619,0.0002373055,0.2688105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99308866,0.000016121592,0.0019692988,0.0044515994,0.0001020604,0.000023240258,0.0000012402626,0.0000030623407,0.00034471383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941194,0.00011567528,0.00009681246,0.00007856113,0.00016696415,0.00013004504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996013,0.00020128796,0.000014965094,0.000059405542,0.000070536684,0.000052472118],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042204696,0.000034421566,0.000034566117,0.000015183781,0.00045047386,0.0000557239,0.00007873356,0.00002342138,0.0013774263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046430016,0.000027007514,0.000016161974,0.00007461745,0.0003163475,0.0001546615,0.0000115133835,0.000050800343,0.00023413345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017058705,0.000022697139,0.0023523602,0.0000013453362,0.000003416493,5.441936e-7,0.19948055,1.591268e-8,0.000016691727,0.78968996,0.0010429888,0.007387724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025089632,0.000032181237,0.040600378,0.000031062205,0.000025745585,0.000002034468,0.49809766,0.000008411797,0.002319543,0.33961695,0.11881724,0.00019791431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003764992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020781899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45007303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045323497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007599455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015722806","doi":"10.1007/s10503-008-9104-0","title":"Evaluating Corroborative Evidence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Topic Modeling","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Social science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.23986453346287462,"score_gpt":0.4065833421626628,"score_spread":0.16671880869978817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015722806","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3625474,0.000059777158,0.6364211,0.0003450116,0.00014858802,0.000080730446,7.567785e-8,0.00006096245,0.00033635838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8075497,0.000014239501,0.19198586,0.00024721498,0.000028232056,0.000013233379,8.447644e-7,0.0000020436155,0.00015861681],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999279,0.000061674255,0.0001261223,0.00019703599,0.00023905186,0.00009708149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995416,0.00009349795,0.00006300601,0.00020248462,0.00007301141,0.000026418727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020984065,0.000049105325,0.00004748005,0.000033610493,0.00013583657,0.000032147193,0.00021010621,0.000014131482,0.000016553637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009580378,0.00004867776,0.000015615416,0.00016017111,0.000013958394,0.00096267415,0.000054681554,0.000041178697,0.0001007545],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031516724,0.00017100573,0.06506142,0.000047964702,0.000050261955,0.000087935536,0.07879748,0.05835164,0.1508604,0.12650356,0.0022653716,0.5177715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000293705,0.00012508374,0.019018253,0.000044319528,0.000004231893,0.000027534372,0.000113012975,0.9585335,0.017460834,0.0041961214,0.000038027465,0.00014534316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026706268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002084154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9001819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048587135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005235403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19850214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015992625","doi":"10.1007/s10503-009-9174-7","title":"The Uses of Argument in Communicative Contexts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"One Mind","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Oblique case; Argumentation theory; Typology; Epistemology; Proposition; Point (geometry); Psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.017552343735170686,"score_gpt":0.2930221697169443,"score_spread":0.2754698259817736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015992625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9216496,0.0007002691,0.06881406,0.004989545,0.00030348147,0.00076774455,0.0000016295315,0.000051050316,0.0027226375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979428,0.00008390829,0.0017220833,0.00016656882,0.000006537756,0.000011558217,0.0000028624322,0.0000013163657,0.00006236838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993136,0.00012714555,0.00023480205,0.000093994895,0.00014453416,0.00008593702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999382,0.00012310191,0.0001567331,0.00028525144,0.000037953796,0.000014925966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003173222,0.00004838553,0.000068663576,0.000039720704,0.00007656274,0.000038809787,0.0003104641,0.000015737005,0.0000027650399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018255003,0.000035274785,0.000020960155,0.0001419256,0.000016119531,0.00028242043,0.000028575876,0.000037041897,0.000010502522],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037233196,0.00046794757,0.031783264,0.00001556284,0.000034701934,0.000002245354,0.02400459,0.0003889011,0.033575572,0.5548116,0.0011114599,0.35376695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012869079,0.0002212228,0.91866535,0.00007403354,0.0000044973094,0.0000017038826,0.000655382,0.017552322,0.04699617,0.012816205,0.0015821699,0.00014405278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009369993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008891956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88688207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004355904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000121253215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14384641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016904097","doi":"10.1007/s10503-009-9157-8","title":"Wrenching from Context: The Manipulation of Commitments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Dialectic; Fallacy; Argumentation theory; Sociology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025875086071075203,"score_gpt":0.267559195080551,"score_spread":0.2416841090094758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016904097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63637257,0.00006387997,0.36187473,0.0007264365,0.0002623878,0.00022025524,0.0000017588044,0.000031058906,0.00044692488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99690443,0.000004006541,0.0026448914,0.0003453193,0.00003323223,0.0000041811822,0.000025447918,0.0000016061227,0.000036879064],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993755,0.00006691624,0.0001978782,0.00011383423,0.00018253406,0.00006330563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995378,0.00004962096,0.00017208752,0.00019635097,0.000029372803,0.000014728663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001412627,0.000051324245,0.00006176212,0.0000302047,0.00008419384,0.000048535123,0.0001830363,0.000018906381,0.00001323726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007783217,0.00003816842,0.000025957956,0.000090525646,0.0000056076988,0.0004200276,0.000015479003,0.000029219203,0.00002019271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002122681,0.00028914088,0.066659644,0.000013594809,0.000075674754,0.0000021567794,0.023823986,0.0012892873,0.09359848,0.18318938,0.0018361566,0.6292013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065083767,0.00007304122,0.8820713,0.000031172982,0.0000108243385,7.524727e-7,0.00022935664,0.08473961,0.022374721,0.009408774,0.0003209122,0.0000886579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003696302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031449476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8154117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027390066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000060225307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1556463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024283275","doi":"10.1007/s10503-011-9203-1","title":"Enthymemes: From Reconstruction to Understanding","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Phenomenon; Set (abstract data type); Resolution (logic); Philosophy; Computer science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","score_opus":0.3097350493222602,"score_gpt":0.28115900681270983,"score_spread":0.02857604250955037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024283275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70065296,0.000042332034,0.008328325,0.00053500716,0.0037290354,0.000266933,0.000032950295,0.0001187162,0.28629377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683595,0.000010673393,0.0011832096,0.00056154147,0.0003289146,0.000012567267,0.00003329583,0.000008850512,0.0010250113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995126,0.000037240257,0.00013884547,0.0001353305,0.00007717866,0.00009876645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999749,0.000037370246,0.000061355866,0.00008833063,0.000026817137,0.00003714244],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009257671,0.00006535326,0.000074305215,0.00005469052,0.00017761136,0.000044441294,0.00004733778,0.000026742322,0.0025257021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010220372,0.000064384294,0.000032105112,0.00001888875,0.00008402992,0.00025395944,0.0000100553925,0.000058289785,0.00026440047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023572078,0.00003317117,0.0013887275,0.0000075289763,0.000048160364,9.699471e-7,0.20616598,7.376478e-7,0.0006301496,0.7852274,0.00079831365,0.005675249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007492104,0.00025198894,0.0031940658,0.00007755642,0.00012243638,0.0000023308255,0.18367207,0.0000422664,0.012852167,0.779895,0.018744282,0.0003966369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009478506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012788221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.296183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006905833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010263958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99838614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045422233","doi":"10.1007/s10503-012-9262-y","title":"Teleological Justification of Argumentation Schemes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Teleology; Argumentation theory; Dialogical self; Normative; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Action (physics); Inference; Argumentative; Communication studies; Causality (physics); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.028149674408245035,"score_gpt":0.28112629319507365,"score_spread":0.25297661878682864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045422233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57386947,0.000091077694,0.42463893,0.00018625939,0.00043353697,0.0002183207,0.0000011459285,0.00006260157,0.0004986596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727508,0.000016807786,0.02688453,0.000079819234,0.00008404975,0.000034497698,0.000041319567,0.0000042444008,0.00010395912],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990027,0.0000850533,0.00031940587,0.00016527541,0.0002606116,0.00016697978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934477,0.000051881856,0.00026050283,0.00021576746,0.00007148815,0.000055588927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036859963,0.00008340321,0.00009752993,0.000093141025,0.00007055578,0.000031644653,0.00017051962,0.00005000905,0.000055863373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034153905,0.00007622479,0.00003894868,0.0002255599,0.000019201969,0.0011979943,0.000034530774,0.000039356677,0.00010685394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018705898,0.0005938156,0.2396345,0.000105863655,0.00005243372,4.81483e-7,0.0066345036,0.00012436572,0.33444977,0.3230116,0.0011878498,0.094186105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008061487,0.00009573506,0.62430155,0.000025679996,0.000027202363,0.000006911597,0.00039414727,0.013825606,0.35726053,0.0010186421,0.00199977,0.00023807134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002472005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013202332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3988813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005187398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012118055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31083566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063535110","doi":"10.1007/s10503-013-9306-y","title":"Applying Recent Argumentation Methods to Some Ancient Examples of Plausible Reasoning","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Skepticism; Epistemology; Computer science; Deductive reasoning; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology","score_opus":0.04566720233134565,"score_gpt":0.339941475476082,"score_spread":0.29427427314473636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063535110","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29722646,0.00007148003,0.70057327,0.00026044596,0.00041980343,0.001167722,0.000001345531,0.00006834252,0.00021114915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43890777,0.000027297956,0.55981636,0.00044673923,0.000053029653,0.0006256443,0.000022006396,0.0000101429505,0.0000910016],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983899,0.00018845109,0.0004597363,0.00035885515,0.00036813525,0.00023495074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906856,0.00010225024,0.00030313813,0.00026419663,0.00015798438,0.00010387247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006864641,0.00012924464,0.00016595742,0.00020734663,0.00012865705,0.00014028559,0.00025427766,0.000041261064,0.00012820646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006580375,0.00012664348,0.000041355528,0.00044978602,0.0000098663695,0.0013809942,0.00009362392,0.00004865286,0.00014434374],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063106777,0.000098814766,0.008192972,0.00005320439,0.000029932022,3.740204e-7,0.0043801595,0.0017651626,0.6473934,0.026781354,0.001259206,0.3100391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011850131,0.00024027635,0.19479547,0.00016473366,0.000025425394,0.000005761373,0.0013357429,0.11239817,0.6797631,0.0031076884,0.0064997524,0.0004788738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007272971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014085455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3095602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014906203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033616732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5164372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075620909","doi":"10.1007/s10503-014-9328-0","title":"Argumentum ad Verecundiam: New Gender-based Criteria for Appeals to Authority","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St Joseph's Health Centre; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Appeal; Epistemology; Fallacy; Credibility; Injustice; Prejudice (legal term); Sociology; Trustworthiness; Feminist epistemology; Competence (human resources); Adversarial system; Social psychology; Identification (biology); Psychology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Feminist philosophy","score_opus":0.0956511876628936,"score_gpt":0.41031888371542763,"score_spread":0.31466769605253403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075620909","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30722374,0.00036107984,0.50801975,0.063379034,0.0077574337,0.0042610504,0.0000779708,0.0005706259,0.10834936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789111,0.000008363876,0.01510135,0.0020486454,0.00031206865,0.00011607976,0.000039668183,0.000009876482,0.0034528493],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998799,0.00021749968,0.00019417805,0.0002740933,0.00019565897,0.00031954344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933404,0.00023381774,0.00007594701,0.00013206752,0.00006563233,0.00015847605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009022263,0.0001069677,0.00014897886,0.00006192064,0.00071729097,0.000063142536,0.00014340671,0.000081279395,0.00016284744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029957484,0.000116084855,0.000062207415,0.00013857547,0.000072229275,0.00011436511,0.000020644642,0.000044336037,0.00014599584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006520824,0.00045525254,0.026556058,0.00025280096,0.000262284,0.000003010199,0.16749176,0.00007297491,0.0051620025,0.25102526,0.41953337,0.12853314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002247932,0.0005971396,0.0599877,0.00003317893,0.00011772817,4.9134303e-7,0.011168954,0.00025973062,0.004161507,0.1078858,0.8129692,0.0005706568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044420414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008629545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67168736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010134065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107573964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55168945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081478863","doi":"10.1007/s10503-007-9026-2","title":"Constrained Maneuvering: Rhetoric as a Rational Enterprise","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Chrysler (Canada); University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Political communication; Sociology; Communication studies; Political science; Social science; Politics; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.033501667693689216,"score_gpt":0.2837933877003815,"score_spread":0.25029172000669225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081478863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29336447,0.0003725669,0.0043497654,0.001414627,0.0012486211,0.00028776823,0.000007879496,0.00017823839,0.69877607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98977214,0.000069260816,0.00027820744,0.00058902183,0.0002623052,0.000017743181,0.000038637627,0.0000064140045,0.008966244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942654,0.00001701213,0.00019134847,0.000095840755,0.0001560771,0.00011318769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996226,0.00007935531,0.00007658317,0.00010972461,0.00008042735,0.00003129896],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015907749,0.00007233165,0.00006696508,0.00005635689,0.00030978434,0.00006776975,0.00007780235,0.000014266024,0.0016344464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001447915,0.00006860214,0.000034116638,0.000029693381,0.00009109295,0.00019397572,0.000025242889,0.000047298065,0.00035434714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043776927,0.000089229885,0.0008024518,0.00000558911,0.000056748657,0.0000032961477,0.05067655,0.0000026281987,0.0004105799,0.92831653,0.0057156323,0.0138769625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010664838,0.00013812381,0.0058937077,0.000020658079,0.000028128401,0.000009412341,0.03546477,0.00007598804,0.001083743,0.010180561,0.94575244,0.00028600445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000901492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001155653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9400368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053095016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015617621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190206316","doi":"10.1023/a:1014929916547","title":"Speaking Your Mind: Large Inarticulateness Constitutional and Circumstantial","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Utterance; Epistemology; Articulation (sociology); Phenomenon; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03153362823316836,"score_gpt":0.26335414476723884,"score_spread":0.2318205165340705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2190206316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57150394,0.00025848052,0.421028,0.00022400558,0.00037825233,0.00010319039,0.0000021485193,0.00005241679,0.006449566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963033,0.000016600412,0.0033845943,0.00012121735,0.00007042199,0.000005223627,0.000007604022,0.000002264435,0.000088726534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932086,0.000031840376,0.0001203496,0.00021362159,0.00014160371,0.00017172402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997199,0.000024785266,0.000053940297,0.000107772925,0.000042866584,0.00005072005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000119043325,0.00007405429,0.00006907097,0.000049312486,0.00018065571,0.00012733375,0.000113465016,0.00003119166,0.000117293326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020298397,0.00006919557,0.000018399604,0.00012786851,0.00006774945,0.0005343723,0.00006479514,0.00004304658,0.0001329642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069155694,0.00031476165,0.039266966,0.000022136017,0.00003858469,0.00006788265,0.010151179,0.00005351826,0.010646387,0.8716426,0.00043538684,0.06735368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012488691,0.0005613998,0.22141822,0.00017806563,0.00013112758,0.0008609245,0.0019763496,0.6479714,0.029319705,0.035100266,0.048075084,0.0019187445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007991106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008571405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8365423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003076122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012924542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28217137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498181842","doi":"10.1007/s10503-016-9406-6","title":"Analogical Arguments: Inferential Structures and Defeasibility Conditions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Analogy; Defeasible reasoning; Computer science; Similarity (geometry); Inference; Predicate (mathematical logic); Defeasible estate; Argument (complex analysis); Feature (linguistics); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.045432872190207724,"score_gpt":0.2797130563004607,"score_spread":0.234280184110253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498181842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.972006,0.000022178272,0.0002356869,0.0015088265,0.0002741385,0.0001382087,0.00010984613,0.000055555876,0.025649564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986226,0.000008807285,0.000036723897,0.0002819508,0.00031177074,0.000013692602,0.0000447712,0.0000046712858,0.0006750118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994476,0.00004085895,0.00014047696,0.00016321125,0.000104725164,0.000103163904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997065,0.000076524935,0.000045712404,0.00008247535,0.0000357258,0.000053047686],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000044481185,0.000078917605,0.00007801351,0.00003439122,0.00020953311,0.00007724254,0.000038608887,0.000024148947,0.004538152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002832283,0.000048031277,0.00003439477,0.000014790074,0.00024404403,0.00029981707,0.00002250697,0.000036561934,0.00006515982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017784496,0.00004640204,0.0024134743,0.000004684511,0.000021492035,8.3194004e-7,0.00084053475,1.343908e-7,0.001089523,0.990798,0.000589155,0.004178012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008023042,0.00008838055,0.056434635,0.000012193902,0.00003451219,0.0000014382665,0.0002451861,0.0000055689197,0.00079406047,0.9286167,0.012840731,0.0001242616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020253896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012399758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062181246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023569466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000058902824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782790951","doi":"10.1007/s10503-018-9448-z","title":"Case-to-Case Arguments","year":2018,"lang":"da","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Presentation (obstetrics); Decision theory; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.061689954352459664,"score_gpt":0.29997310287292606,"score_spread":0.2382831485204664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782790951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8431326,0.0000857504,0.0001604312,0.002581987,0.0037907546,0.00068318815,0.00027701294,0.00010282978,0.14918543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805904,0.0000093263,0.00020336964,0.002669899,0.0057639917,0.00003859027,0.000058685582,0.000039293525,0.010626419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983515,0.00010841505,0.0004425141,0.0004621641,0.00022558724,0.0004097758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898887,0.00009744495,0.00014740632,0.00033196394,0.00018071,0.0002535906],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001844911,0.00028171568,0.0002185073,0.00015589186,0.0012876417,0.0004647035,0.00011346935,0.00008394478,0.008261809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036442954,0.0002769496,0.00011477818,0.00013610866,0.00031233742,0.00047310567,0.00009630717,0.00015635302,0.009179178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030128172,0.0010286723,0.00020947016,0.00013260821,0.0004323732,0.022829441,0.089782484,0.0000050437643,0.0005596373,0.7842706,0.049701978,0.05074645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030611064,0.0026345279,0.00014104701,0.0002045053,0.000609686,0.011264784,0.013848551,0.00076381536,0.003686938,0.06951149,0.8929553,0.0013182401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050791696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012094489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8432533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013498313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027366757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785615823","doi":"10.1007/s10503-018-9450-5","title":"Practical Reasoning Arguments: A Modular Approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Computer science; Argument (complex analysis); Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Modular design; Action (physics); Management science; Programming language","score_opus":0.038621864060251504,"score_gpt":0.3220105740568914,"score_spread":0.2833887099966399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785615823","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05725223,0.00001059906,0.93501174,0.00051635405,0.00038170797,0.0002451781,6.892865e-7,0.00015551907,0.0064259493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7520246,0.0000040525815,0.24711806,0.00027452165,0.00016880294,0.000029346531,0.000016879281,0.000007188142,0.0003565822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988942,0.0000997444,0.0002039515,0.00032450267,0.0002940815,0.00018349911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941045,0.000025996173,0.00013531296,0.00030268356,0.00006041925,0.00006514016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027257792,0.00009311813,0.00008396222,0.00007304604,0.00016648717,0.00019899492,0.00018784251,0.00004370237,0.0000523531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004099355,0.0000875951,0.00003151138,0.0002374286,0.000022703754,0.0014577158,0.00007253339,0.000056439996,0.0003266919],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005370041,0.0010457209,0.023230622,0.00009546661,0.00019799326,0.000021657146,0.013752726,0.00021982788,0.03692013,0.8564428,0.028451763,0.03956757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013763652,0.0002486616,0.030702302,0.00004673561,0.000024859199,0.000053788233,0.000377663,0.9253567,0.02897292,0.0020185246,0.010423971,0.00039755207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032741784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017135734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9251368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005142883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029083412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41990724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792093414","doi":"10.1007/s10503-018-9456-z","title":"David Hitchcock (2017): On Reasoning and Argument: Essays in Informal Logic and Critical Thinking","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Communication studies; Political communication; Critical thinking; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science; Argumentation theory; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.05187436558278319,"score_gpt":0.31249694906645137,"score_spread":0.2606225834836682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792093414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91495067,0.00014794704,0.00012564546,0.0012305565,0.000529348,0.00016270338,0.000006443529,0.000041469717,0.082805224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969249,0.00005861847,0.0004749139,0.0016811149,0.00033624514,0.000012069861,0.000018224007,0.000008565143,0.00048536103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922127,0.000060998573,0.00019765383,0.00018450526,0.000139317,0.00019623314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995666,0.00017489106,0.00006143213,0.00009139,0.000060840433,0.000044817334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039239868,0.00010910859,0.00012694008,0.00008364109,0.00040905058,0.00017174546,0.000051345298,0.00005595941,0.00010158795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000957504,0.00009899733,0.000016881691,0.000021702892,0.00044417725,0.00046755362,0.000039307164,0.00016433101,0.000033073968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027751257,0.000036100366,0.0034990069,0.000041422663,0.000009543353,0.0000037452576,0.074609436,8.6963536e-7,0.00006377598,0.9188894,0.00014793515,0.0026710078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038363382,0.002306047,0.052478697,0.0007068334,0.00016432998,0.000042269916,0.05643518,0.0018332177,0.001980528,0.85034657,0.028839502,0.0010304743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015040231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059259706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08231986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019703308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014195387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4036994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973664585","doi":"10.1007/s10503-019-09488-w","title":"Place, Image and Argument: The Physical and Nonphysical Dimensions of a Collective Ethos","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Argument (complex analysis); Political communication; Communication studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Philosophy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.019995401097422535,"score_gpt":0.26508401134247306,"score_spread":0.24508861024505052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973664585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829813,0.00012793606,0.000013979417,0.00060884154,0.000051815656,0.00022524928,0.000007302153,0.000010286809,0.015973287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99656636,0.00009972892,0.00006511812,0.000099653844,0.00003918461,0.000028760227,0.0000040117734,0.0000044004437,0.003092773],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996249,0.00005036135,0.00008574967,0.00008899883,0.00009086727,0.000059100934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995348,0.0002277996,0.00006184422,0.00010813893,0.000053664953,0.0000137682555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000061020393,0.000058958783,0.000100913596,0.000018495724,0.00022626507,0.00003687382,0.000040389008,0.000008030802,0.000042939926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000075961757,0.000034782177,0.000020100706,0.000027461923,0.00020672043,0.00012653304,0.00006221667,0.000052471503,0.000019238034],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008312616,0.00027113463,0.0033225922,0.000039157247,0.00019090172,2.4280982e-7,0.55277604,0.0000035255625,0.005727659,0.43013304,0.0036500276,0.0038025691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008343847,0.0021293294,0.13645993,0.00023876925,0.0006982937,0.000009797184,0.5704722,0.011680471,0.0120831225,0.1087833,0.14790641,0.001194541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057876372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014310746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32134977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012595011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000950392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17402709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022807652","doi":"10.1007/s10503-020-09519-x","title":"Annotating Argument Schemes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Premise; Annotation; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03570340326657566,"score_gpt":0.25885827924126475,"score_spread":0.22315487597468908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022807652","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23084839,0.00005622841,0.7633003,0.004162836,0.00025972768,0.00023630663,0.0000010988172,0.00019613134,0.000938952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666343,0.000005193173,0.03167663,0.0015023102,0.00009276422,0.000017815952,0.000011316205,0.000004896754,0.000054768698],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991988,0.000040319672,0.00019397371,0.00023057476,0.00021520292,0.00012112814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996397,0.00002301326,0.00010899658,0.00012293247,0.000034110886,0.0000712762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010236513,0.000073873176,0.00007163726,0.00002848056,0.00008874587,0.00011138107,0.00018518888,0.00002007201,0.000036344416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002585599,0.000072224124,0.000029734778,0.00018947103,0.000005296659,0.0006122026,0.000052274743,0.000040489445,0.000250367],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002733433,0.00023442562,0.051062256,0.00023992869,0.0001345008,0.00002824129,0.04427542,0.0015765219,0.35894117,0.21000145,0.013176925,0.32030183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021816092,0.0003058334,0.039787926,0.00005717486,0.00001956125,0.000006668922,0.00083028385,0.7359044,0.19232349,0.0012710835,0.026704915,0.0006070436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014905695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010246464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7357859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029407442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014053449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3218045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081569111","doi":"10.1007/s10503-020-09528-w","title":"Attack, Defense and Counter-Attack in the Inuit Duel Songs of Ammassalik","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Adversary; False accusation; Action (physics); Rhetorical question; Law; History; Psychology; Literature; Criminology; Political science; Computer security; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.04379366312895286,"score_gpt":0.32571152061051206,"score_spread":0.2819178574815592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081569111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947299,0.00014364468,0.00019001325,0.0011859108,0.00009435335,0.0002286243,0.000017735994,0.000014454726,0.0033954044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973655,0.000022695689,0.000089754125,0.002291871,0.000057060544,0.000033083543,0.00004167418,0.000008154267,0.00009024593],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992699,0.00015148545,0.00018625075,0.00015605206,0.0001314408,0.000104893246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996839,0.00008056926,0.00008687397,0.00009598656,0.00002713593,0.000025517935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001971978,0.00007210008,0.000096392185,0.00003535023,0.000025342484,0.000020686917,0.00007063622,0.000043729888,0.00039650855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002301562,0.000056240213,0.000026625636,0.00014223723,0.000038911985,0.000096721495,0.00001197981,0.000076816366,0.00009360716],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006406429,0.00047960496,0.10661382,0.00016860553,0.00018286984,0.00009950594,0.8002017,0.000015241265,0.011120172,0.0101541225,0.020255866,0.05006783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00901734,0.0011810919,0.6858467,0.00008138755,0.00033462408,0.000066039516,0.2866604,0.0005818632,0.005050353,0.004256728,0.006319828,0.00060363254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015535121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002222548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5792329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013293605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008377917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43414906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124279947","doi":"10.1007/s10503-006-9018-7","title":"The Fallaciousness of Threats: Character and Ad Baculum","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Political communication; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.010980686476686666,"score_gpt":0.28641609411378227,"score_spread":0.2754354076370956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124279947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746625,0.0008767813,0.000019614416,0.0035321312,0.00014581576,0.00013313539,0.0000035117166,0.000017575217,0.020608947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99786204,0.0007560589,0.000023696077,0.00004462547,0.000057550533,0.000009648732,0.000004585047,0.0000020811626,0.0012397413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995663,0.000048912418,0.00009028351,0.000066411376,0.00013559281,0.00009250173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977523,0.00007668212,0.00005134154,0.000042859054,0.000042250515,0.000011644565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020440327,0.00003526694,0.00004855634,0.00001121105,0.00048458698,0.000034804045,0.00004315158,0.0000198024,0.000017914717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014596398,0.00002642727,0.000017297614,0.00006470147,0.00019931264,0.00011596286,0.000013751163,0.000023613029,0.000005862016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050653172,0.00014811492,0.1526071,0.000027368773,0.00008922316,0.0000021694657,0.13293307,0.0000018339929,0.0015494504,0.536422,0.003544366,0.17262462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006735889,0.00004945661,0.726159,0.00002651132,0.000051940136,7.008835e-7,0.083824076,0.000010781257,0.0012481485,0.08132283,0.10643862,0.00019439246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001963911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015280587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57355183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017659391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011898281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8526926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206105180","doi":"10.1007/s10503-007-9021-7","title":"Book Review","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Social science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.047168097385020986,"score_gpt":0.31497934462574345,"score_spread":0.26781124724072247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206105180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054614875,0.30123073,0.0012397973,0.010312291,0.0028104335,0.0007406289,0.000012089106,0.0002044987,0.67798805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12145451,0.044233683,0.00057979726,0.51219165,0.0031134544,0.000055820612,0.00032247193,0.000057709472,0.31799093],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953514,0.000023852848,0.00015868728,0.00008384007,0.00009333684,0.00010513021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997131,0.00005311274,0.00006609671,0.00008520625,0.00005776878,0.000024721898],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036117207,0.00005249377,0.0000801732,0.000022692377,0.00011447977,0.000019676154,0.000042064177,0.000016569917,0.003018213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001592964,0.000046956444,0.000040320912,0.0000136060835,0.00008379059,0.00017764205,0.000006435035,0.00006354068,0.00039664187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059653403,0.000046771256,0.00008176879,0.00036982924,0.000026795531,0.0000036523456,0.011806403,1.519176e-7,0.00013911072,0.2977962,0.6783063,0.011417074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009820456,0.000025824766,0.00015704556,0.000095999916,0.000029240404,7.8218596e-7,0.0005046835,7.9519805e-7,0.00048789493,0.002146147,0.99639255,0.000060853214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037665486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011943075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50187933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016455584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008318368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99789315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245697206","doi":"10.1023/a:1019945119167","title":"The Practice of Argumentative Discussion","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Dialectic; Communication studies; Political communication; Rationality; Sociology; Sociocultural evolution; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.022618110095706166,"score_gpt":0.2943735452023237,"score_spread":0.27175543510661754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245697206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02838455,0.0018419565,0.00016577184,0.01594418,0.0007811887,0.0003664249,0.000020005837,0.00005483836,0.9524411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980983,0.0002667047,0.00014521953,0.00023167112,0.00013344831,0.00002360856,0.000007789867,0.0000064970845,0.018202027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933946,0.000074848445,0.00018709368,0.00008937442,0.00021393491,0.000095264615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993879,0.0001964542,0.00018157612,0.000120226505,0.00010077792,0.0000130647],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016059795,0.00006462691,0.000074577845,0.000029911993,0.00040520233,0.00008191573,0.0000831376,0.00000710741,0.0018636143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010388597,0.000031047042,0.000048430964,0.00003627414,0.00023397269,0.00041132528,0.000024670786,0.000039648075,0.00012790771],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030283016,0.00025554592,0.00021424123,0.000012335045,0.00046399585,0.0000032788575,0.369449,0.000017634165,0.0002712996,0.5001697,0.034563247,0.09454948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047506776,0.0001434636,0.00017324278,0.000027402864,0.00029124113,0.0000012495672,0.52921844,0.00034172938,0.0017058881,0.0036575655,0.46380928,0.00015539737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007257154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001702617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9525985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019029632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019629751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248259855","doi":"10.1023/a:1011156918137","title":"Emotional Messages","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.0442418674709357,"score_gpt":0.3702571211262045,"score_spread":0.32601525365526884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248259855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94799656,0.00003757248,0.001401238,0.00062774593,0.0004721321,0.000087528846,0.0000034954812,0.000051210576,0.049322497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98088247,0.000009087831,0.000507477,0.00025587474,0.00007601426,0.000028532606,0.00006232309,0.000006135293,0.018172117],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996076,0.000027066502,0.000087805645,0.00010841895,0.00007394655,0.000095141586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998235,0.000011358597,0.00002704023,0.00009054034,0.000020846646,0.000026687392],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005340415,0.000043813874,0.000036779526,0.00004318108,0.00005910341,0.000012470083,0.00003675633,0.000027202315,0.010580377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000024616472,0.00004277372,0.000024195619,0.00008471787,0.000015189625,0.0000859734,0.0000060149428,0.000034189445,0.0014104967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004979047,0.0006571751,0.58053565,0.0000038236817,0.00005390474,0.00006354828,0.0022655437,0.0000156013,0.007143955,0.16915785,0.04410954,0.1959436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044445324,0.00004630667,0.98517126,0.0000035702176,0.000014246776,0.000027947379,0.0005264622,0.0000055493642,0.00023726092,0.0009289553,0.012529444,0.000064557215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005629881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009669842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40463558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018194165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038535445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318982896","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09603-y","title":"Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Argument (complex analysis); Communication studies; Economic Justice; Sociology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Positive economics; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.16370481807376638,"score_gpt":0.32816689764985746,"score_spread":0.16446207957609107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318982896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97150403,0.00008776487,0.000010978995,0.0013831094,0.00047056045,0.00012433619,0.000023212755,0.000060781196,0.026335223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99188113,0.00010276499,0.00002871219,0.00024206567,0.0002667166,0.000010986775,0.000060128605,0.00000827411,0.007399222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942845,0.000047760892,0.00016415642,0.00011159398,0.00013187069,0.00011617189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966615,0.000086702064,0.0001012068,0.000053171345,0.00007256258,0.000020226142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020744091,0.00007005794,0.00011478721,0.000075587974,0.00026613715,0.000043448348,0.000041181025,0.000029353047,0.00008569491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002281671,0.000066064495,0.000064797794,0.000039770028,0.00025821436,0.00012586928,0.00002368683,0.00005449494,0.000054778808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023331831,0.000068220965,0.0018589582,0.0003820634,0.00015930037,0.0000018906524,0.21359472,0.000010749062,0.0019736118,0.7659927,0.012668725,0.0032657504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036044933,0.00095113955,0.035207488,0.00012742371,0.0017926114,0.000005248053,0.52559805,0.0009606301,0.006708186,0.108050086,0.31601188,0.0009827536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000064127475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012505196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6579426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013275376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012116541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2694032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319870956","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09607-8","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on Fallacies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Political communication; Communication studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Philosophy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.019407541881785773,"score_gpt":0.27604805601261884,"score_spread":0.25664051413083305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319870956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4787695,0.000013812218,0.17127705,0.31186575,0.024819043,0.0020380132,0.000007629499,0.0009961294,0.010213073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9346431,0.00002479801,0.0020904434,0.002423965,0.044437733,0.0001345038,0.000062801766,0.000015356907,0.016167318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992832,0.000052872758,0.0001178422,0.00020050819,0.00023601319,0.00010954064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963814,0.000030641128,0.000044446577,0.00023316771,0.00002835178,0.000025264615],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026467693,0.00005562071,0.000044099987,0.000096080585,0.00015745348,0.00011891972,0.00018489434,0.000016376878,0.00009752738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030386074,0.000040942177,0.000020420586,0.00046680326,0.0000048254633,0.00024536767,0.000040192175,0.00003241379,0.006495795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000777976,0.00002135978,0.00029935746,0.0000056816148,0.000008967834,0.0000011429017,0.006965824,0.003410848,0.0033213396,0.021567058,0.85785776,0.106532864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022753428,0.000115693445,0.05593277,0.000007803356,0.0000033951173,0.0000017639796,0.0004510442,0.012839153,0.010953812,0.000493381,0.91885465,0.00011901431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027995357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031885695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45587358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046201483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000065250683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319871818","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09606-9","title":"Committing Fallacies and the Appearance Condition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.048006236654045804,"score_gpt":0.28564047049037,"score_spread":0.2376342338363242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319871818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95784473,0.0002580233,0.000104248866,0.0066170595,0.00068297604,0.0002425471,0.000010409563,0.0001396864,0.034100335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995261,0.00009231542,0.000012494058,0.0007894097,0.00019477628,0.000023012173,0.000035803623,0.0000050358167,0.0035861342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995994,0.00007707324,0.0000969433,0.0000730223,0.00007450622,0.00007907658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996927,0.00015003233,0.000054917757,0.000059208913,0.00003338594,0.000009782233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035896793,0.000044585788,0.0000655114,0.000024186565,0.00039424017,0.00008559706,0.000035161836,0.000014329519,0.000034715766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002732004,0.000031564894,0.000022211847,0.000024262612,0.000417295,0.0001366055,0.000014108429,0.00006327236,0.00011895014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011635045,0.0000050203357,0.00047412832,0.000031052143,0.000019008821,4.886081e-7,0.075274065,0.0000072919074,0.000109765286,0.9199103,0.0016099294,0.002547286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049148845,0.00011816845,0.023720227,0.00013433298,0.00014914642,0.000004966446,0.17065404,0.003156122,0.0012795118,0.5951406,0.20030715,0.00042086534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011366604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022658943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32476977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000052824635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000040187806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30322164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319985130","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09600-1","title":"Textbook Treatments of Fallacies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Philosophy; Epistemology; Section (typography); Literature; Classics; History; Art; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04047829285631277,"score_gpt":0.37423643125720885,"score_spread":0.3337581384008961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319985130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.750904,0.000010820934,0.00007962401,0.0002544755,0.00016236633,0.00006948649,0.0000052141563,0.000039416867,0.2484746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970127,0.000004309587,0.00004121461,0.00006872545,0.000016116679,0.000016249287,0.000012052778,0.0000024194703,0.002826261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996346,0.00002683678,0.00007883122,0.00008779106,0.000083449006,0.00008848055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998137,0.000048581718,0.000028288401,0.000079022364,0.0000090747835,0.000021368107],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007867049,0.00003213431,0.00004174064,0.000039175917,0.00002797801,0.0000036257245,0.00005349017,0.000016722726,0.0007539106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008660785,0.000026728501,0.000019674897,0.00018424582,0.00007030937,0.000046748926,0.000010724602,0.000014112777,0.0015319753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001998813,0.00005686329,0.004591963,0.0000025269314,0.000024351491,0.000003560138,0.0024622586,0.0000032719047,0.006590847,0.97235805,0.0004266976,0.013459625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075271877,0.00022366348,0.3439449,0.000008471383,0.00002443057,0.0000019307608,0.0009512859,0.00005545024,0.013040387,0.64028174,0.00062665757,0.00008838037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019127021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.4933697e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33935297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009329605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000028873214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360980452","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09609-6","title":"Fallacies and Their Place in the Foundations of Science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Mathematical proof; Philosophy; Deductive reasoning; Inductive reasoning; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06861749761720014,"score_gpt":0.27477879710224934,"score_spread":0.2061612994850492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360980452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9621684,0.00001762193,0.000004363135,0.0013272903,0.000108888074,0.00005926017,0.0000038518106,0.000011055347,0.036299266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999498,0.000011311273,0.000009972432,0.00011528678,0.000021793503,0.0000065848562,0.000002795664,8.511801e-7,0.00033341674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997178,0.000011046711,0.000059723876,0.00006173916,0.000094413226,0.00005528839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998459,0.00005374622,0.000024968733,0.000047426467,0.000021067926,0.000006859414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032527128,0.000023586985,0.000025904463,0.000108565306,0.0003650459,0.000054467815,0.00009430076,0.0000031631591,0.00003527906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001561508,0.000015406138,0.0000063414514,0.0001284519,0.0010660628,0.0003516849,0.000012190931,0.000018523553,0.000014571368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017194953,0.000010610248,0.00021613268,0.000004922807,7.3102524e-7,1.3574208e-7,0.27531072,0.000011839844,0.0025514888,0.72052026,0.0002069335,0.0011645394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060748716,0.00024508804,0.0757427,0.000048964757,0.000010081556,0.0000029701878,0.42167318,0.002079267,0.0023855283,0.40802607,0.08894219,0.00023647638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000073832976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003969392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31249416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010700106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017874943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3927953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360985377","doi":"10.1007/s10503-023-09604-x","title":"Teaching the Fallacies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Communication studies; Political communication; Sociology; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Engineering; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.050463391144813005,"score_gpt":0.272851442163362,"score_spread":0.22238805101854897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360985377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5523322,0.000018539213,0.000031881267,0.03173796,0.00033094012,0.00023699449,0.000017392475,0.0003342683,0.4149598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837023,0.0000035796904,0.000015129995,0.00063779287,0.00041516454,0.00005033217,0.000037121867,0.0000052666674,0.015133282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997056,0.000019952697,0.000069301845,0.000062737025,0.00007247574,0.000069909256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981874,0.00004715222,0.000024589921,0.0000869049,0.000012415774,0.000010179044],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009852167,0.000036468675,0.000025708297,0.000027577522,0.0006019988,0.00009780608,0.000067265566,0.000006207305,0.00023484374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000052963683,0.000024515546,0.000021557616,0.000028747887,0.000057875754,0.00012261316,0.000013373195,0.00004630716,0.0013532729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.008732e-7,0.00000616752,0.000032966273,0.0000024098717,0.000006524698,2.1036448e-7,0.03670633,0.0000061991423,0.00027227413,0.94814473,0.010107058,0.0047143116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012367283,0.0000190378,0.0012727663,0.0000054629672,0.000014010717,6.623857e-7,0.01750913,0.00025232023,0.0002929556,0.15047926,0.8299458,0.00008493451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007465757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000571035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81983876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006375171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000033527733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400700211","doi":"10.1007/s10503-024-09635-y","title":"Remembering Tony Blair (1941–2024)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.026399392426038983,"score_gpt":0.3374100325706624,"score_spread":0.3110106401446234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400700211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33660865,0.0002780748,0.00015371991,0.0027610476,0.0021708985,0.00006842374,0.000002682352,0.00013384002,0.65782267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94384754,0.00005114321,0.000095392475,0.00026742445,0.0003587143,0.000006548864,0.0000045716283,0.0000036968308,0.055364963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995861,0.000019323345,0.00007965484,0.00010154386,0.00006980687,0.0001435603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998569,0.000030498672,0.000008040216,0.000034590223,0.000006293055,0.00006366934],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016755782,0.000033805223,0.000038449205,0.000030212082,0.00020287724,0.00006668359,0.000042757012,0.000024502386,0.0022132075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014291996,0.000034371657,0.000029780342,0.000057870955,0.000053018455,0.00022124159,0.0000065750187,0.00003828641,0.0011399665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006417653,0.000028202508,0.00086744205,0.000046726567,0.000032589684,0.000017164224,0.04100017,0.000017778979,0.0010028611,0.7925268,0.068498485,0.0959554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004337187,0.000009216165,0.00060407375,0.000011961135,0.000007656155,4.7415605e-7,0.0015781537,0.00019646945,0.00016475705,0.013714579,0.9836071,0.000062201936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008938058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043532293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9151086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014543226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045370594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410540562","doi":"10.1007/s10503-025-09656-1","title":"Chinese Argument from Qi 氣 and the Place of Ethos in the Kisceral Mode","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Argument (complex analysis); Political communication; Communication studies; Epistemology; Mode (computer interface); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics; Social science; Computer science; Politics; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.011767975455567925,"score_gpt":0.3369376238112258,"score_spread":0.32516964835565787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410540562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96381485,0.00022890496,0.000062161285,0.0101891095,0.0001689932,0.00028298752,0.0000058878964,0.000005705677,0.02524137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987531,0.000021417145,0.00006861636,0.00085358525,0.000056632594,0.000026899706,0.000008516115,0.0000014687031,0.00020977564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992104,0.00038272233,0.00012198219,0.00008499606,0.00015171808,0.000048167927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994349,0.00040333724,0.000049165406,0.000089802386,0.000013027131,0.00000978041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005840676,0.00004694949,0.00007574205,0.000030209028,0.00020533545,0.000023104774,0.000121300414,0.000025438716,0.000017440323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000728785,0.000026408876,0.000025534968,0.0001816522,0.00017947028,0.00009451037,0.000015058455,0.00006791697,0.0000021547798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027790392,0.0000924485,0.049145296,0.000012763107,0.000026563239,8.4525874e-7,0.32340726,0.00018126763,0.00031987947,0.6241022,0.0006808673,0.0017527145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018799746,0.000013544694,0.09033857,0.000024812924,0.000025457892,9.310727e-8,0.006129179,0.00068883924,0.000066338005,0.89909226,0.0016754672,0.000065436245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009119979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037098587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3172781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039676437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000317083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99747837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412817136","doi":"10.1007/s10503-025-09669-w","title":"“Deliberative Context” Is not the Whole Story of Deliberative Reasoning: the Site C Case of Disagreement Management in Indigenous Consultations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Political communication; Epistemology; Sociology; Communication studies; Political science; Deliberative democracy; Social science; Public relations; Geography; Politics; Philosophy; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.025995604315173247,"score_gpt":0.31472984365467166,"score_spread":0.28873423933949843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412817136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.966314,0.0006706834,0.00027473344,0.0047943653,0.000117885276,0.0011597434,0.00018268646,0.000016055455,0.026469806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945155,0.00006034401,0.00013540123,0.0008678298,0.000013118089,0.00018204433,0.00006455145,0.0000063133543,0.0041549467],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998912,0.0003336711,0.00036283553,0.00012866413,0.00015504927,0.00010780045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987809,0.00040298808,0.00025877307,0.00033539304,0.00021075949,0.000011164343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037826804,0.00010744314,0.00013541331,0.00010044969,0.00051584654,0.000084718355,0.0001709784,0.000018030942,0.00017011115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024842582,0.00006897633,0.000045777757,0.00011916423,0.00041890368,0.00022442329,0.00006643195,0.0001356315,0.000010616657],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003137592,0.000120245895,0.00023855641,0.000025887435,0.00018501488,0.0000059447734,0.655587,0.00011790123,0.00012896069,0.334893,0.0013257237,0.0073403954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011277453,0.00006852577,0.004662415,0.00011886079,0.00015892464,0.000003127827,0.97997737,0.00022495868,0.002984026,0.003760469,0.006791271,0.00012233613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015655082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012761851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33113253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006974438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006092837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7121412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}