{"meta":{"query_hash":"2933a3e1dace","filters":{"venue":"Argumentation and Advocacy"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2933a3e1dace","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Argumentation+and+Advocacy"},"results":[{"id":"W2562018607","doi":"10.1080/00028533.2016.11821871","title":"Navigating the Visual Turn in Argument","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation and Advocacy","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Argument map; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Key (lock); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.016344682915485114,"score_gpt":0.3438215733245135,"score_spread":0.3274768904090284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562018607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08213324,0.0060330806,0.3535596,0.03719216,0.0013900887,0.00009415174,0.000119705364,0.0005360749,0.5189419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242564,0.0012004423,0.061873112,0.001230269,0.00017780386,0.000102561775,0.00009646482,0.00034027745,0.010722562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991372,0.0064913896,0.00014493596,0.00068847236,0.0008191124,0.00048421678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873426,0.009714674,0.0008169529,0.0009171068,0.0007359441,0.0004726968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065553095,0.00086578185,0.00058828096,0.0028288204,0.0052204574,0.013972242,0.0019446005,0.0044751493,0.013972466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029782187,0.00062514114,0.00082208513,0.0015182456,0.024073996,0.02425556,0.01177118,0.00447481,0.0017273839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000619769,0.000018669525,0.00051523227,0.00013403861,0.000008887128,0.00027072616,0.0327908,0.0005142012,0.00086445606,0.94345737,0.0029941204,0.018369429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003124885,0.00002854021,0.00022526567,0.00026247912,0.000008702006,0.0002873281,0.015700618,0.002078935,0.00072619837,0.9027595,0.07786988,0.000021338763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018805903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023226554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013972466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028542723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017922379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04674256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901372401","doi":"10.1080/10511431.2019.1525002","title":"Making room for auditory argument","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation and Advocacy","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Linguistics; Psychology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.09086863553332207,"score_gpt":0.3361495280654507,"score_spread":0.2452808925321286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901372401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04242283,0.0035895626,0.14946832,0.03898506,0.007376106,0.00015781978,0.00012856552,0.0010807898,0.756791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8585087,0.0023000694,0.053043857,0.003930713,0.0024042637,0.00024092857,0.00020289051,0.00069896167,0.078669645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913237,0.005421871,0.00024345552,0.0007720112,0.0016748203,0.0005641858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98257625,0.013322551,0.0008625705,0.0012944777,0.0011831435,0.00076106726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00754718,0.00081397645,0.00046092787,0.0017442269,0.0049733114,0.012548991,0.0016975454,0.0040201806,0.0318852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046355117,0.00036763915,0.0007167721,0.00081634714,0.009084265,0.014858363,0.010293026,0.004517075,0.008075823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020668175,0.00010131284,0.0009346276,0.0006089137,0.000027246877,0.00081221096,0.057973877,0.0006121028,0.0041736476,0.81667835,0.03196152,0.085909486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073701354,0.00009362612,0.0006205906,0.00096416596,0.000046968256,0.00052012556,0.03431066,0.0022751605,0.0030288426,0.47709885,0.48091212,0.000055108812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031291042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006039986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0318852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010877112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015011101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106666625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254013976","doi":"10.1080/00028533.2008.11821684","title":"Proleptic Argumentation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation and Advocacy","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021199202339409796,"score_gpt":0.24645170504048408,"score_spread":0.22525250270107428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254013976","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042277626,0.0042259065,0.58716416,0.009212279,0.00084877334,0.0005931046,0.00030591176,0.0007628228,0.39265928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29072896,0.005969893,0.6095564,0.0034594496,0.00094990095,0.0010374455,0.0007816709,0.00039549678,0.08712086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97727454,0.013508075,0.0014815336,0.0019848184,0.005033514,0.0007175357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97607315,0.013721231,0.0016157533,0.0043172226,0.0033774157,0.0008953251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015257903,0.0011653667,0.000869599,0.003228813,0.004101524,0.014094558,0.0028717606,0.0041336087,0.013197002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033663183,0.0006063426,0.0010629932,0.002637903,0.01049781,0.010388103,0.0073331217,0.0045470614,0.0072326474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018645256,0.000018299173,0.00014089333,0.00018124841,0.000010804412,0.00009104976,0.0014897112,0.00032807692,0.00018888812,0.96048677,0.00602708,0.031018516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022598331,0.000021670017,0.00010190603,0.00035322562,0.000013518606,0.00040511633,0.0007572212,0.0023942485,0.0007749568,0.6660009,0.32913277,0.000021797365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009389271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095205434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015257903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030714807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004171805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08069253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403784918","doi":"10.1080/10511431.2024.2419747","title":"Understanding fallacious reasoning <i>via</i> detecting moves of motivated criticism in Argument Continuity—a new strategy of circular reasoning in coping responses to disagreement within a distorted reasoning context","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation and Advocacy","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Analytic reasoning; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Criticism; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Coping (psychology); Verbal reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Social psychology; Philosophy; Cognition; Law","score_opus":0.035246680906485986,"score_gpt":0.2840686886128992,"score_spread":0.24882200770641322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403784918","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21926439,0.000636206,0.7333419,0.006042882,0.00018212524,0.00048433224,0.00067769294,0.0016590958,0.037711434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7334667,0.00017172452,0.2620956,0.00034770984,0.000059853177,0.00032015305,0.00045397447,0.00029547923,0.0027887349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859337,0.007690932,0.00094362063,0.0028943606,0.002025938,0.0005114034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92258024,0.04793829,0.012881749,0.011236964,0.004354269,0.0010084826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016324263,0.0008014815,0.00054707297,0.008288697,0.0031226748,0.011915252,0.0026915965,0.0028074353,0.003537098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0763956,0.00071138726,0.00080972194,0.0044318186,0.012785998,0.014643048,0.008458511,0.003084796,0.0009008376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032453839,0.0001499277,0.06984552,0.00097245205,0.00010867627,0.0017458356,0.32605466,0.0035291428,0.018823126,0.35023957,0.005822364,0.22238407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047810787,0.00012144336,0.048987765,0.0012279922,0.00014050027,0.0023100744,0.117236555,0.0863949,0.02144174,0.59928614,0.1225054,0.00029976762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004421591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00559054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016324263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002988832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032560518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08633202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117575203","doi":"10.1080/10511431.2025.2600219","title":"Assessing <i>tu quoque</i> arguments using real-world data: media coverage of the start of Russia’s war in Ukraine","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation and Advocacy","topic":"European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Media coverage; Interpretation (philosophy); Journalism; News media","score_opus":0.06115856072451619,"score_gpt":0.3815702006917,"score_spread":0.3204116399671838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117575203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893048,0.00044062888,0.00021780805,0.00039089078,0.000026932521,0.00001998939,0.0013492801,0.000004845485,0.008244921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817705,0.00017748446,0.00014267903,0.00004925417,0.00003340331,0.000021905675,0.0011378281,0.00000490734,0.00025548428],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967758,0.0012875496,0.00037401015,0.00029918,0.0010165498,0.00024691265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96503276,0.021984776,0.008601378,0.0010268936,0.0029204434,0.00043377627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052481913,0.0002572965,0.00035087432,0.007174239,0.0008387248,0.0043835705,0.00037038024,0.0009646408,0.0019064832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029121526,0.0001633463,0.00026175074,0.005768278,0.0013819726,0.0031052849,0.002227886,0.00078398356,0.00052731327],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026722127,0.000091195434,0.95099866,0.00031169373,0.0002676064,0.000391992,0.023371747,0.00047989702,0.0008136835,0.0030341623,0.0014322742,0.018539947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006675667,0.0000946662,0.94348425,0.00020489302,0.00006996602,0.00020291773,0.0434875,0.0012484391,0.0008573975,0.00045419586,0.009863556,0.000025380625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065025506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006674066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007174239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012956453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005224822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02775538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W832645221","doi":"10.1080/00028533.2012.11821778","title":"Dialogic Potential in the Shadow of Canada's Indian Residential School System","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation and Advocacy","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Argumentation theory; Sociology; Negotiation; Argument (complex analysis); Injustice; Indigenous; Compromise; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Social science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.01903988630529818,"score_gpt":0.23221198498196594,"score_spread":0.21317209867666775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W832645221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48885882,0.0022702108,0.0033286726,0.07308509,0.00042510347,0.000096205324,0.000108883476,0.00014668483,0.4316803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98918694,0.00016017376,0.00034989105,0.00091008306,0.00002539284,0.000012272103,0.000007887413,0.000021348966,0.009326132],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932996,0.0031630453,0.00008893592,0.00057855825,0.00085006264,0.0020198375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923913,0.004015451,0.0003549313,0.0003401305,0.0010271287,0.0018711712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056225606,0.00038953664,0.00045372426,0.0018405109,0.07915977,0.02424369,0.002787041,0.004648411,0.008155404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010262924,0.0003396416,0.00029484776,0.002331787,0.052323844,0.005314143,0.011229646,0.007414638,0.00045427328],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043501786,0.000035591536,0.0017203502,0.0000652505,0.00000867593,0.001544156,0.5825626,0.0003013452,0.0003555173,0.39283973,0.009590278,0.010933016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031824715,0.000018494313,0.002475686,0.00018717287,0.000021632415,0.00023441347,0.64781785,0.0007890256,0.000533662,0.040629394,0.30719694,0.00006390333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86648405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9381675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13351595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11585009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10727069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8405552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}