{"meta":{"query_hash":"3ea7e74836a9","filters":{"venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours"},"cohort_total":28,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":28,"exported":28,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3ea7e74836a9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Argumentation+et+analyse+du+discours"},"results":[{"id":"W1518327270","doi":"10.4000/aad.556","title":"La normativité naturelle : une théorie de l’argumentation comme discipline engagée","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02437414218079427,"score_gpt":0.3299178772058468,"score_spread":0.30554373502505255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518327270","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028805595,0.008417391,0.52073175,0.054160584,0.0010171477,0.00013578663,0.00012163434,0.00020436094,0.38640574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90025425,0.003117664,0.06975164,0.002461592,0.0006270568,0.00042607237,0.00010562301,0.00024613537,0.023009928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96310824,0.02801744,0.0009404577,0.0024940395,0.0044567757,0.0009831162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668684,0.024138255,0.0021543936,0.0030837462,0.003026513,0.0007287138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023535052,0.0007902873,0.0011557295,0.0032932817,0.00675819,0.017275063,0.0023130102,0.0067423736,0.0037262307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027038727,0.0006184758,0.0013348954,0.0035885028,0.050653394,0.022927377,0.0064990367,0.007072433,0.001151229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073942533,0.0000063038765,0.00010471321,0.000036826008,0.0000051698044,0.000028052375,0.0066572153,0.00012524273,0.00007512096,0.9902597,0.000538489,0.002155754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013920248,0.000009571911,0.00013107623,0.00017377999,0.00000757628,0.000076257864,0.002775425,0.00095985114,0.00020983869,0.9585227,0.037108906,0.000011174732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004184713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026670303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023535052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0079447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006345367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12446678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525681879","doi":"10.4000/aad.302","title":"Performance… et contre-performance communicationnelles : des stratégies argumentatives pour le débat politique télévisé","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04443329151310394,"score_gpt":0.3095437225943805,"score_spread":0.2651104310812766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525681879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.146231,0.008424587,0.2072488,0.058736466,0.0010091861,0.00023977678,0.00012115807,0.0002624755,0.5777266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592156,0.0014613706,0.014539688,0.0008288553,0.00027882634,0.00022466117,0.000049157512,0.0001723776,0.023229415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796998,0.014548312,0.00053280557,0.0012597041,0.003185856,0.00077349105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97122025,0.02210824,0.002214481,0.0015410696,0.0022871785,0.00062877045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013398092,0.0011746689,0.0006145179,0.0040462245,0.0061913235,0.016067263,0.0016105605,0.0058816792,0.0056822207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025656672,0.0005474662,0.0006091807,0.003297866,0.029732252,0.016499028,0.0046646176,0.0066201137,0.00128341],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054550714,0.000019805062,0.0005562971,0.00015303108,0.0000097103375,0.00019115483,0.107155114,0.00018911419,0.00077482045,0.87774855,0.0011300276,0.012017799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062144645,0.00011936058,0.0030181557,0.0011977445,0.000059330574,0.0008011569,0.18623659,0.0041578,0.004464537,0.5026724,0.29711527,0.00009555223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033567394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027016976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016067263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008259461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051948284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07085675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572730762","doi":"10.4000/aad.1252","title":"Insulte, disqualification, persuasion et tropes communicationnels : à qui l’insulte profite-t-elle ?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04959784188851349,"score_gpt":0.3493032278127482,"score_spread":0.2997053859242347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572730762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27921805,0.013281224,0.044835377,0.20366511,0.003535307,0.00009718155,0.00012443574,0.00027082002,0.45497248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95727485,0.0024916385,0.0034881085,0.0064144665,0.00043135302,0.000060105693,0.000039118866,0.00016507761,0.029635241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860092,0.00940686,0.00027721535,0.0009048921,0.0021307191,0.0012712674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810403,0.010338336,0.002162077,0.0016334569,0.0029483119,0.0018775119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009628253,0.0007842455,0.00061450567,0.0014006484,0.0073607164,0.01342312,0.0014971409,0.0053450223,0.009394853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023333855,0.00030720193,0.00063245714,0.0010537419,0.030145753,0.015390929,0.0063025034,0.008466008,0.0018654792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012861237,0.00007270502,0.0034604033,0.00033937756,0.000028762754,0.00083256816,0.32016554,0.00014372589,0.00086882635,0.6273833,0.006484888,0.040091246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039642495,0.00014622604,0.008314342,0.0013996407,0.000060641123,0.0014530884,0.44807628,0.0006734325,0.0019463588,0.20602357,0.33173704,0.00012977514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071327058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008546985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01342312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053144936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051867645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050919652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1859937076","doi":"10.4000/aad.1787","title":"La rhétorique de la qualification et les controverses d’étiquetage","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017346894870144382,"score_gpt":0.33756022209762643,"score_spread":0.320213327227482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1859937076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07669727,0.03761004,0.06591425,0.25981712,0.00533626,0.00009932027,0.00014313048,0.00014086175,0.5542418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94034487,0.008546644,0.0067413147,0.010162102,0.0025885005,0.0001038912,0.00005884628,0.00026658032,0.03118729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9681646,0.022723984,0.00094263087,0.002179909,0.004723513,0.0012653796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9535407,0.03895967,0.002517443,0.0016973484,0.0027289398,0.0005559516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022983516,0.0005859388,0.0007972388,0.0038732102,0.014434551,0.013152155,0.0016973126,0.007238518,0.005654067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036390115,0.0006163865,0.00055295887,0.0043019527,0.04550179,0.016000016,0.007081697,0.011853797,0.0012210923],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011363417,0.000004502321,0.00022322207,0.000077548,0.0000034732266,0.00007121418,0.035260893,0.00003717956,0.00011282619,0.9571866,0.0026361502,0.0043751365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022979588,0.000038914706,0.0016337963,0.0011968612,0.000022284266,0.0003587913,0.05132999,0.00047103886,0.0009928261,0.39082626,0.5530458,0.00006046024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008449992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010721762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022983516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009262638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061554355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121549904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22849709","doi":"10.4000/aad.749","title":"Meyer, Michel. 2008. Principia Rhetorica. Une théorie générale de l’argumentation (Paris : Fayard)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Humanities; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.017982394316284078,"score_gpt":0.30466748325624365,"score_spread":0.2866850889399596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W22849709","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007281699,0.59930086,0.047468923,0.14614254,0.0053922436,0.00011104281,0.0012710637,0.00060855993,0.1924231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42510107,0.35409245,0.055851948,0.010565785,0.003662507,0.0006195331,0.0010210333,0.00095868047,0.14812693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983729,0.0008048964,0.00013180882,0.00020879356,0.00037289018,0.00010872326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99552816,0.0028299382,0.00040701235,0.0001893231,0.0008914154,0.0001541207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031989007,0.0012257496,0.0006198655,0.0036278523,0.0047392626,0.00572547,0.0010753225,0.0032263233,0.01003317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008895411,0.00088873506,0.00064225716,0.0035138417,0.0048758667,0.014134681,0.0016225938,0.0042645414,0.0044957437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015211235,0.00004672421,0.0014595456,0.0011392531,0.0000587899,0.00041180407,0.025201013,0.00052612904,0.00071663666,0.52191484,0.29872385,0.14964919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042610183,0.000027822012,0.0025721085,0.0016475847,0.00006567623,0.0003336536,0.0054170084,0.00032418885,0.0008537671,0.21049924,0.7781699,0.000046456356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013033819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015909296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013033819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004464551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036722594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03356427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555114952","doi":"10.4000/aad.2248","title":"Le « printemps érable » au Québec : « Grève » ou « boycott » ? Les enjeux stratégiques d’un conflit de nomination","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Nomination; Art; Law","score_opus":0.029145474671227866,"score_gpt":0.30033672909054904,"score_spread":0.2711912544193212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555114952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39064518,0.004022121,0.011484236,0.07756304,0.0005634546,0.00017583507,0.00039317316,0.000110427,0.5150425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9203489,0.00064624415,0.001380167,0.002264107,0.000035779114,0.000046358346,0.00005409739,0.000054802553,0.07516949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954405,0.0017846037,0.000102705075,0.0005216112,0.001223516,0.00092710095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99338174,0.0020057303,0.00053074537,0.00032263066,0.0027025877,0.0010565183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044391043,0.00041002547,0.00039446223,0.0017023715,0.022176605,0.008597216,0.0012955706,0.0024850732,0.014386994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008963393,0.00036286708,0.00027180868,0.0023138323,0.017481845,0.004140766,0.003691536,0.00457414,0.0007576867],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013389123,0.000044615448,0.01877533,0.0002387329,0.000037501748,0.0007429948,0.31744158,0.00056545733,0.0018086387,0.57995623,0.027617546,0.05263735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003178619,0.000057009154,0.04057175,0.00077545864,0.000056117653,0.00019501097,0.26872772,0.001169681,0.0013045885,0.027795704,0.6591619,0.00015330882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93331146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97234714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068489246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068489246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056552127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4969266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W266986670","doi":"10.4000/aad.1978","title":"L’ethos collectif des guerrilla gardeners à Montréal : entre conflictualité et inclusion","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Urban Agriculture and Sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.02872784984303722,"score_gpt":0.2860743003259383,"score_spread":0.25734645048290106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W266986670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81487894,0.0021480205,0.0019058395,0.0071018687,0.00007413062,0.00008584423,0.0005418459,0.0000658762,0.17319772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97887576,0.0004084902,0.0005272496,0.00019413036,0.00001096196,0.000035051355,0.000079309946,0.0000352721,0.0198338],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985134,0.0003904393,0.000028313932,0.0002803109,0.0003664324,0.00042118633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980129,0.00064270926,0.00031945272,0.00015481275,0.00044856744,0.00042155694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001777486,0.00037206995,0.00037145062,0.0019086184,0.014937765,0.005716996,0.0011476268,0.0007962381,0.008078826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033424527,0.0002751419,0.00019495028,0.0032050416,0.014594293,0.0021651078,0.0039656404,0.001334277,0.000285195],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000142123,0.000039627324,0.03546482,0.00022555585,0.000043149157,0.001204797,0.7924714,0.00043762353,0.003459166,0.114150405,0.008683187,0.04367808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020321246,0.000045106197,0.20906936,0.00026839922,0.000032736778,0.0002565011,0.4433099,0.00037880367,0.0009805047,0.005265913,0.3402457,0.00012674111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93659675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97749954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06340325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045188013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02190793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3278635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761116884","doi":"10.4000/aad.2420","title":"Une approche comparative des discours institutionnels en éducation aux médias : une analyse socio-anthropologique","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Education, sociology, and vocational training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3410631500394508,"score_gpt":0.5516588344486597,"score_spread":0.2105956844092089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761116884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15054516,0.039647553,0.10737696,0.13335007,0.001797003,0.0005846842,0.0012142141,0.0001591626,0.5653252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.905751,0.014129249,0.028555809,0.0043285233,0.00062919344,0.0008509573,0.0003573422,0.00014982492,0.045248207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921482,0.0048744665,0.0002415678,0.0007036628,0.0014149756,0.0006171451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823058,0.011619193,0.0011899623,0.00091833493,0.0035581726,0.0004084736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0088402415,0.00092529017,0.00084998924,0.011552953,0.01156976,0.014083906,0.0019669759,0.0035977662,0.0086832065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01083435,0.00042664565,0.0008282232,0.009265706,0.032703966,0.011241555,0.00464302,0.004898744,0.0005916235],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022422144,0.000020042307,0.0028176182,0.0003922947,0.000026037667,0.00034256777,0.19124752,0.00026777748,0.00040524802,0.78263974,0.0034760835,0.018342549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016145343,0.000040239116,0.013822112,0.0022035511,0.000063310275,0.0005184211,0.28879702,0.00079053704,0.00079393917,0.16286936,0.530019,0.00006639208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17428689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.237701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17428689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027170632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018420225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34654486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892526192","doi":"10.4000/aad.2688","title":"Analyse de formules employées par le gouvernement et de leurs stratégies de cadrage sous-jacentes pendant le printemps érable québécois de 2012","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03169310465657911,"score_gpt":0.31144913596877766,"score_spread":0.27975603131219856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892526192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68060285,0.009280362,0.0053550424,0.028369756,0.00075191905,0.00026848417,0.001024568,0.000095624775,0.2742514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8200221,0.003571522,0.002699644,0.0019933071,0.00008013203,0.0001728465,0.00045345357,0.0001292132,0.17087775],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996256,0.000965449,0.000107181106,0.000389562,0.0017040352,0.0005777982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98826796,0.0038376192,0.0008771839,0.00031786607,0.005535394,0.0011640426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004923461,0.00036867542,0.00042256367,0.0024353084,0.010036135,0.0074319597,0.0010040757,0.0013392651,0.011412275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106459,0.00028419454,0.00033266263,0.0031533856,0.006249211,0.0031616194,0.001746511,0.0022489876,0.0011023406],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023395118,0.00009204818,0.038786534,0.0010278221,0.00008483986,0.0014618478,0.6241696,0.0007271906,0.005021801,0.13988115,0.05495668,0.13355657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014764678,0.000054838914,0.084263965,0.0010543984,0.00006730029,0.00014109537,0.3265454,0.00062614185,0.0014063116,0.004370141,0.5813484,0.000107255895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77679926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90705895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22320074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046399634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04373035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4490304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980608115","doi":"10.4000/aad.3585","title":"Querelles historiennes sur la Révolution française : l’argumentation par le chiffre des victimes et les polémiques sur la qualification génocidaire","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.01446165075572932,"score_gpt":0.25256976773247963,"score_spread":0.2381081169767503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980608115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4419835,0.024890915,0.0033532658,0.16905919,0.001167587,0.00002649351,0.00023508655,0.000033984586,0.35924992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655839,0.0030613025,0.00025769338,0.0033406795,0.00017339333,0.000008777828,0.00003178338,0.000022343087,0.027520133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963058,0.0018284619,0.00008871515,0.0003562303,0.0005816911,0.0008390663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99505156,0.0029138988,0.00053498027,0.00031268504,0.00088522845,0.0003016259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045571714,0.00036079204,0.00028519172,0.0010955121,0.010418486,0.006241522,0.00071703177,0.0027191823,0.006952504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007687659,0.00021459452,0.00024631197,0.0014199911,0.018534804,0.003187972,0.0023809047,0.004138812,0.0006480131],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008207641,0.000017240973,0.0046899673,0.00008986056,0.000021839325,0.0009791534,0.23875397,0.00019061583,0.0005240768,0.71908695,0.015601341,0.019963015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002677176,0.000049067075,0.016393,0.00065299415,0.000025042209,0.00036038968,0.13179648,0.00030612503,0.0006963587,0.05385522,0.7957807,0.000057815752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28817138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33112237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28817138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020167017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010772574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57298803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092763271","doi":"10.4000/aad.4477","title":"La raison interculturelle et les conditions préliminaires de l’argumentation","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Argumentation theory; Philosophy; CONTEST; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03116105619235884,"score_gpt":0.36976634532505215,"score_spread":0.33860528913269333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092763271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10815619,0.014634879,0.09199423,0.08594642,0.0018106524,0.00040920608,0.00038072205,0.00019315539,0.69647455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96087873,0.0023879756,0.017009571,0.002910684,0.00039735154,0.0006674356,0.00014021291,0.0001367588,0.015471212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9456155,0.037104286,0.0024291226,0.005511319,0.0068599614,0.0024797756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9281485,0.051347062,0.0038734765,0.006280286,0.008833784,0.001516975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030801788,0.00077981624,0.0012468755,0.0036050174,0.012342173,0.021393562,0.0024219875,0.007474473,0.009436816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055600822,0.00097595336,0.0015571461,0.002905907,0.05221266,0.028511416,0.009113335,0.007763492,0.0019993046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035086003,0.000015426001,0.0004320396,0.00011364407,0.000009838128,0.00023459442,0.027011152,0.00010410977,0.00044109242,0.9679902,0.0008507997,0.0027619358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054145847,0.000084113344,0.0018210168,0.00072433904,0.000041750027,0.000571528,0.0552127,0.00084514945,0.002385243,0.78857374,0.14960271,0.00008346458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064173574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006553996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030801788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013851548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011399618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16289735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097506787","doi":"10.4000/aad.4432","title":"Les régimes de rationalité en environnement à travers le prisme des valeurs","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.05820170062604697,"score_gpt":0.31213673103986883,"score_spread":0.25393503041382187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097506787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13191938,0.0019326548,0.10564294,0.04681057,0.00022341676,0.00017507256,0.00015294572,0.00013648078,0.7130065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760165,0.000515802,0.009173426,0.00093151984,0.000044071196,0.00011964608,0.000039094397,0.00006259946,0.013097312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97662485,0.011700808,0.00090314704,0.002731249,0.006154198,0.0018857518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752666,0.011884486,0.0023660413,0.004065434,0.0054191547,0.0009983728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021517713,0.0007347794,0.0006870201,0.0027574794,0.008084613,0.0156141,0.0018789995,0.0038442397,0.00621332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027054371,0.00058383215,0.0008269216,0.0023830123,0.061577037,0.009347894,0.006185892,0.0060391724,0.0007169938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015719734,0.000008059647,0.0007690101,0.000038133676,0.0000119,0.000039716633,0.012721789,0.000380328,0.0001688315,0.98088926,0.00050205743,0.0044550523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039520008,0.000039239472,0.004260238,0.00030937468,0.00003194183,0.00007044424,0.019607373,0.0014681114,0.00068308983,0.8882427,0.08519401,0.000053909785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05685613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027302235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018333541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19809252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3104092441","doi":"10.4000/aad.4696","title":"Les raisonnements contrefactuels dans l’histoire","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Ethnology; History","score_opus":0.03275369177592694,"score_gpt":0.27050986320654896,"score_spread":0.23775617143062203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3104092441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1842172,0.013993516,0.038248155,0.026498185,0.001452557,0.00011821149,0.00008618024,0.00011832439,0.73526776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8981402,0.003028384,0.0044091265,0.00087150437,0.0003313743,0.00009286051,0.000037356443,0.00015330185,0.09293592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99266386,0.004431296,0.00026617423,0.00082986953,0.0012589458,0.0005498846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940335,0.0038411508,0.0006018492,0.0006444651,0.00070342567,0.00017562529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051312135,0.00064627134,0.00044548162,0.0014494399,0.008316793,0.007682604,0.0010466315,0.0022358585,0.005975859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009503795,0.00033520855,0.00038724882,0.0016769257,0.022900589,0.0054226005,0.003854501,0.0051050754,0.0011039806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032044263,0.000013427031,0.0007632656,0.00014238303,0.000007888257,0.00037751376,0.15325788,0.00018169779,0.0009106097,0.83270115,0.0021474943,0.00946475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010568419,0.000030438514,0.0017711824,0.0004547192,0.000018112334,0.0009170442,0.07761033,0.00034882675,0.00201203,0.07324705,0.84354687,0.000032882454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055848644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010206178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008316793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050959247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027127308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036973715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W313229293","doi":"10.4000/aad.1969","title":"De l’appel à mobilisation à ses mécanismes sociodiscursifs : le cas des slogans écrits du printemps érable","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05480768441524738,"score_gpt":0.32069413989507656,"score_spread":0.2658864554798292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W313229293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38673335,0.0027084053,0.013397436,0.0340711,0.00034933924,0.00007720725,0.00010655118,0.00010121289,0.5624554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96360993,0.00042355302,0.0010217149,0.0008237115,0.000037659138,0.000034880002,0.000028506696,0.00006428937,0.03395575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551386,0.0029106676,0.00010250421,0.00045258194,0.0005594328,0.00046092464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604106,0.0022123426,0.00048089886,0.00039045475,0.00054679526,0.0003284843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033472644,0.00051632,0.00041232698,0.001762019,0.01101287,0.007699865,0.0008199082,0.0029572854,0.0059903897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006237043,0.0002964745,0.0002498859,0.0017690412,0.030882325,0.004581795,0.005263156,0.0038244291,0.0011384565],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003256876,0.000011228391,0.0023646546,0.00009763386,0.000008731456,0.0009930709,0.46588734,0.00009445201,0.00083060085,0.5166293,0.0043756356,0.008674818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021764734,0.000035636287,0.0080639105,0.00058199436,0.000023694438,0.0011147964,0.34845334,0.0006185015,0.0011117631,0.06944728,0.5704833,0.000043931177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04052734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0689971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95947266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007424597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004833741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08058292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153348501","doi":"10.4000/aad.5418","title":"La polémique autour de bonjour/hi sur le web : vers la déconstruction du discours d’autorité","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016117215364328547,"score_gpt":0.27382588165056615,"score_spread":0.2577086662862376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153348501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17194699,0.026103856,0.01167918,0.16859825,0.0022047053,0.00007458187,0.00028104748,0.00016512093,0.61894625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8113293,0.0078758,0.0015000511,0.0146044055,0.0004338826,0.00007337329,0.00008773329,0.00022823922,0.16386715],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962902,0.0018893844,0.00007472535,0.00032695392,0.0008360135,0.0005827361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99433017,0.0027388716,0.00038338968,0.00033296022,0.0015390038,0.0006755649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040315012,0.00065062055,0.0004612672,0.0018156361,0.01714021,0.01614173,0.001148173,0.0048792036,0.010598953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054696975,0.00047633945,0.0003255758,0.001816376,0.03250726,0.011053547,0.0044419332,0.00837917,0.0017761127],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003911746,0.000030346833,0.002668429,0.00017863368,0.000011113784,0.0007371561,0.48044696,0.00011619383,0.0006878111,0.4711796,0.027380913,0.016523615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009740694,0.000016141561,0.0030472768,0.0006324802,0.00000926073,0.0003518317,0.14087468,0.00021744482,0.00047429296,0.02148668,0.83282787,0.000052174015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48913154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6104596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48913154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025110979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015276436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9725689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206035181","doi":"10.4000/aad.5483","title":"Discours du tourisme diasporique : l’exemple d’une visite louisianaise en Acadie","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Université Sainte-Anne","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Geography; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.008672682309734493,"score_gpt":0.2780925566760386,"score_spread":0.2694198743663041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206035181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78786623,0.0020733164,0.001344138,0.023897966,0.00022813273,0.000033632004,0.00015431494,0.000043100907,0.18435918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96673155,0.0011092406,0.00028327398,0.0011904535,0.000029170953,0.00001686486,0.000036921567,0.000025373667,0.030577138],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840206,0.000576715,0.000030886837,0.000118836644,0.00035984875,0.0005117117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982186,0.00064713863,0.00018303646,0.00007357931,0.00049510377,0.0003825008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001254619,0.0003126176,0.00025585905,0.0008771306,0.025849301,0.0053664693,0.0008475876,0.0018636261,0.0038914923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025618502,0.00018573189,0.00020661211,0.0014403914,0.011796928,0.0016213823,0.0043099173,0.004530842,0.00036391898],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034128385,0.00002407115,0.009172487,0.00009930284,0.000010279245,0.0017971384,0.88658,0.00014810012,0.0009841572,0.08042077,0.009183603,0.011545958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047271146,0.000015797086,0.009607372,0.00018656996,0.000009050022,0.00036514833,0.61505836,0.000114270464,0.00028069183,0.0013079694,0.3730085,0.000041557076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83508945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9337265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16491055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02808313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024468502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33176345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207035486","doi":"10.4000/aad.5779","title":"L’analphabétisme au sein d’une communauté linguistique minoritaire : la construction du sujet en problème social (1984-1998)","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Functional illiteracy; Subject (documents); Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.022101427271501797,"score_gpt":0.31544447911845774,"score_spread":0.29334305184695597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207035486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6466053,0.0034621079,0.007601692,0.023454776,0.00031213576,0.0001029664,0.00017200924,0.000089600144,0.31819946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766064,0.00058199256,0.000574551,0.00027345048,0.000028542194,0.000034936125,0.000037080943,0.000040790906,0.021822201],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964569,0.0014497765,0.00012697853,0.00034347593,0.0008815056,0.0007412895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99461865,0.0023971675,0.0008252383,0.00028041838,0.0012140229,0.0006644942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034150013,0.0004490046,0.00040850157,0.0025978226,0.021572698,0.007350317,0.00095349137,0.0024627422,0.004491345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062948097,0.00037346972,0.00029771737,0.0033346037,0.031805113,0.003823125,0.005732464,0.007007298,0.0004394402],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028630113,0.000020164653,0.0045785946,0.00008954007,0.0000052459113,0.00042308547,0.7720716,0.00008147796,0.00065715885,0.21037458,0.0026212616,0.009048705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013507354,0.000037511123,0.020961331,0.00038174892,0.00001325517,0.00038304811,0.54319835,0.00024040743,0.00097068603,0.014822065,0.41893888,0.000039190374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3627163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45967868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3627163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031586472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024123592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7212101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242785050","doi":"10.4000/aad.4867","title":"Guylaine Martel, 2018. Incarner la politique. La construction de l’image médiatique des femmes et des hommes politiques au Québec (Laval : PUL)","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.028792754383238604,"score_gpt":0.32059363004950847,"score_spread":0.2918008756662699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242785050","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027344856,0.20978865,0.0029716545,0.44348657,0.0038995617,0.00006334616,0.0013441324,0.00020504477,0.31089616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54991996,0.046392426,0.0029322125,0.015900787,0.0008952051,0.000090920585,0.00040138472,0.00032697516,0.38314018],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860233,0.00034252607,0.000029343872,0.00015366382,0.00055567623,0.0003165601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825853,0.0004024186,0.00015711908,0.00007346529,0.0007493931,0.0003591611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016475046,0.00055076304,0.000343053,0.001725515,0.015372535,0.006714814,0.0009492678,0.0037206868,0.025724152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035156806,0.00034614812,0.00023806842,0.002631634,0.011308129,0.004191618,0.0023351791,0.0038132565,0.0027234643],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058621732,0.000019434689,0.0029731642,0.00036451672,0.000016193737,0.0004458509,0.116919324,0.00015425986,0.0004712408,0.27500516,0.51572573,0.08784648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000618397,0.000006280191,0.0073663583,0.0005261114,0.0000068901754,0.000121853576,0.02036074,0.00006421355,0.00016030676,0.0072732335,0.96408296,0.000024866653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94936854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97710323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050631464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049908414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043717526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36211258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366121855","doi":"10.4000/aad.7259","title":"François-Emmanuël Boucher. 2020. Le Trumpisme. Contribution à l’analyse rhétorique du discours national-populiste (Québec : P. U. Laval).","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02003588531987089,"score_gpt":0.2985178311712517,"score_spread":0.2784819458513808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366121855","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008209014,0.57736766,0.0049844873,0.24710561,0.006664236,0.000094561976,0.0023366814,0.00018239679,0.15305537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36772424,0.22605005,0.008205833,0.018487984,0.0030472148,0.0003197049,0.0015874376,0.0005369589,0.3740406],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866974,0.00038498302,0.0000428435,0.00018237693,0.00049389125,0.0002261106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975998,0.0006387606,0.00017610821,0.00007057517,0.0013410101,0.00017377867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018051493,0.0010837241,0.0005246184,0.0032493966,0.007574445,0.0034893933,0.0012870278,0.0038463438,0.01731531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038023638,0.0005480808,0.00036792646,0.004921287,0.005276136,0.0052403677,0.0014644943,0.0036157435,0.004061628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007975312,0.000024388572,0.0030283302,0.0006117634,0.000020723595,0.00033675833,0.020904755,0.00015491525,0.0004560204,0.10893196,0.73441416,0.13103648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011330138,0.0000057265875,0.008107971,0.0008691912,0.0000095042615,0.00014255827,0.004999864,0.00007238675,0.00031129544,0.006278113,0.97917056,0.000021638974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8509797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8875394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8509797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023665298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01444346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2997958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366122265","doi":"10.4000/aad.7276","title":"L’« argument de la nature » dans le discours fasciste du 20e siècle en Allemagne, en Italie et en France","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.00811859375037639,"score_gpt":0.29846462672187485,"score_spread":0.29034603297149847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366122265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13395268,0.013722781,0.011421521,0.08597424,0.0011191517,0.00003217437,0.00012776256,0.00006953071,0.7535801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9201725,0.0020837027,0.0013862489,0.004926251,0.00028750984,0.000048383616,0.00004036015,0.000085656524,0.07096945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742705,0.0014752356,0.000044587698,0.00026899774,0.000462864,0.00032122497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980108,0.0013542345,0.0002497756,0.00009779226,0.00017772926,0.00010976086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019621628,0.00047533656,0.00024336299,0.001134804,0.0057162945,0.005413954,0.00053803483,0.0033902118,0.006620415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003004977,0.00018395357,0.0003097414,0.001007025,0.01549048,0.0037396352,0.0026207878,0.004555212,0.0008467714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021514448,0.000006653732,0.00073537003,0.00007507432,0.000004262325,0.00017924937,0.06127385,0.000067091205,0.0003521209,0.92596024,0.0061234627,0.0052011916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021235792,0.000023856808,0.0047378805,0.00040339842,0.000011938163,0.00036101206,0.029300224,0.00022824398,0.00058417366,0.07764877,0.88665193,0.000027323706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020520529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04165468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020520529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076442244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030889018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055462956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387670712","doi":"10.4000/aad.7658","title":"Élaboration et légitimation de l’identité francophone dans le manifeste littéraire. J’parle mal, pis j’aime ça de Joëlle Préfontaine","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.01617509606465875,"score_gpt":0.29605638237640414,"score_spread":0.27988128631174536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387670712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29101524,0.0033630242,0.01408172,0.04522896,0.0004837772,0.00014107648,0.00029663602,0.000108675915,0.6452809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93972456,0.0006655752,0.0014325649,0.00092296675,0.00006587982,0.000059419453,0.00007561894,0.00007204525,0.056981437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914102,0.0043670414,0.00025573935,0.000823466,0.0021957846,0.00094775064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869436,0.0073738825,0.0012672913,0.0010378377,0.0027020262,0.0006754534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007716346,0.00048922014,0.0003493335,0.0018648276,0.012874694,0.011452859,0.0007296111,0.0026681607,0.009312709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012581246,0.00028760717,0.00035102357,0.0022189494,0.020034976,0.0070539857,0.0045794123,0.0038598988,0.0010040073],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046484893,0.000027206037,0.005503124,0.00012430645,0.000011226292,0.00088286854,0.40367296,0.00013550479,0.0012912293,0.56631905,0.0071720043,0.014814016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000209722,0.00005267103,0.017799135,0.00054909475,0.000030637075,0.0005821949,0.20370278,0.00058802986,0.0016490888,0.04506804,0.7298827,0.000074604555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.117918596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15176958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117918596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02239214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014498952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23446447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394843562","doi":"10.4000/aad.8154","title":"Marc Angenot : La rhétorique à l’épreuve de l’histoire des idées","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.034737108043101324,"score_gpt":0.32040975875858646,"score_spread":0.28567265071548514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394843562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020369867,0.13872181,0.022753201,0.36376452,0.007641319,0.000068227935,0.00017876623,0.00016742162,0.4463349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56062347,0.05529101,0.014149405,0.026504626,0.0057662698,0.00022672034,0.00012278256,0.00051741925,0.33679834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446636,0.0034839055,0.00011815841,0.0006086243,0.0010988737,0.00022412222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99479866,0.003648628,0.00045775657,0.00027304346,0.00059298857,0.00022895283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031868098,0.0006512313,0.00049440004,0.0014859225,0.0067511257,0.006539429,0.0007312532,0.0032424033,0.006573136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009361554,0.00035202794,0.00029168607,0.0013488047,0.016624065,0.008927511,0.0028205775,0.0048711235,0.0019239619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041737643,0.000010167465,0.00034750853,0.0001870787,0.000007799221,0.00022962228,0.029936202,0.00011945365,0.00051697105,0.88218,0.07130837,0.015115155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060922775,0.000010430757,0.00053223356,0.00040665804,0.0000060741368,0.00022430436,0.005696416,0.00020180838,0.0004801763,0.09304487,0.89937085,0.00002007981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022757258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032220952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022757258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059650424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004205242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04524958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394843699","doi":"10.4000/aad.8254","title":"Christopher Tindale : Explorer les fondements culturels de la rhétorique et de la raison","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.02059401128701753,"score_gpt":0.36318925942309443,"score_spread":0.3425952481360769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394843699","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033818074,0.04780985,0.032499447,0.59425676,0.012297436,0.00015970552,0.00011537634,0.00018577243,0.27885756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5509297,0.043492023,0.02790815,0.06866034,0.004677298,0.00057064247,0.000116852345,0.00075820583,0.30288675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943316,0.0033917665,0.00011064422,0.0006653637,0.0011413309,0.00035928443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98285735,0.013064276,0.00056459714,0.00034557513,0.002424632,0.00074357615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006768168,0.0007832089,0.00056171184,0.002582584,0.010873298,0.012256373,0.0017171877,0.005218828,0.0072324243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019024737,0.00044686004,0.00052646955,0.0022185957,0.016277384,0.01635528,0.004553249,0.009842659,0.0012134498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047491936,0.000030821386,0.0009081036,0.00029372764,0.000016793101,0.0004597064,0.094425805,0.00024546438,0.00094252924,0.7273488,0.14326222,0.032018587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012421109,0.000026513633,0.0009485807,0.00073252554,0.000018011939,0.00036343795,0.03964622,0.0006719574,0.0013592333,0.09985035,0.8563027,0.00006799716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02865444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05693132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02865444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009722561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010690706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070542455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394843725","doi":"10.4000/aad.8277","title":"Christopher Tindale: Exploring the Cultural Foundations of Rhetoric and Reason","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Sociology; Political science; Aesthetics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0875440387876914,"score_gpt":0.33046826536769125,"score_spread":0.24292422657999985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394843725","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0891209,0.0341622,0.015758654,0.6375434,0.0060555753,0.00022990201,0.00007460007,0.00013117454,0.21692371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8749994,0.012966742,0.014705671,0.053415593,0.0013133729,0.00049250707,0.000050571332,0.0002900941,0.04176607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870948,0.00861471,0.00021484023,0.0010696587,0.0022351027,0.00077082653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9520474,0.041879807,0.0011337812,0.0005618689,0.0028041222,0.001573012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014163541,0.00060533674,0.00073607353,0.0031192077,0.015090377,0.014829697,0.0025650715,0.008190958,0.0037398683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042721927,0.0006673943,0.00043127598,0.0025905247,0.0386866,0.01923965,0.0060739717,0.013433936,0.0004453156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038919196,0.000040774874,0.0008527143,0.00023561886,0.0000116641395,0.0014942114,0.42496443,0.00020248053,0.00074965187,0.4692095,0.08033538,0.021864759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001887208,0.000033503933,0.0011741135,0.0011941389,0.000013597755,0.0011618305,0.21836531,0.0006405245,0.0009680914,0.08081018,0.6955213,0.00009843701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036612652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049062844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036612652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014157856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013489727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10272288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394843729","doi":"10.4000/aad.8174","title":"Marc Angenot: Rhetoric put to the test by the History of Ideas","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Pathos; Ethos; Persuasion; Epistemology; Sociology; Object (grammar); Logos Bible Software; Perspective (graphical); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.025982262173351544,"score_gpt":0.2848077668052255,"score_spread":0.258825504631874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394843729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028342819,0.20217837,0.01058356,0.2834423,0.008140752,0.000057028472,0.0001153085,0.0001455121,0.46699443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82310075,0.03878684,0.0060924347,0.02460242,0.0062442604,0.00013022305,0.0000782702,0.00023939581,0.100725345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935272,0.00443676,0.00009950422,0.0005530528,0.0010973084,0.00028621397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99506617,0.0039357333,0.0002887092,0.00013393204,0.00041537624,0.0001600308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029649977,0.0005323468,0.00039775934,0.002397626,0.0069057476,0.0065307333,0.00060666056,0.0035692453,0.003995981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010553203,0.0003101767,0.00024407009,0.0015261234,0.015293925,0.008769185,0.0018693836,0.004046173,0.0007208727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005350265,0.00001190372,0.00041656182,0.00011955194,0.0000059034955,0.0004768352,0.07080075,0.00010112528,0.00037564646,0.84337336,0.065144174,0.019120717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005867026,0.000009854859,0.0005165515,0.00045171814,0.0000030950923,0.00034118243,0.009023685,0.00014811309,0.00022992046,0.04362994,0.9456215,0.000018715564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027706949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028595995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027706949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069460482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023911723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05509138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394843815","doi":"10.4000/aad.8119","title":"Michael A. Gilbert: Not arguing logically is not illogical: Other ways of communicating arguments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.126980649537492,"score_gpt":0.3387212657828483,"score_spread":0.21174061624535628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394843815","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007198845,0.04432809,0.048386104,0.758027,0.0060912766,0.0000634003,0.00010691371,0.00023745894,0.13556086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6530845,0.044273257,0.07577046,0.13216223,0.008115188,0.00039898595,0.00017378137,0.00066545646,0.08535617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990952,0.006679357,0.00023423025,0.0006750056,0.0012393545,0.00022001503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9727768,0.021480454,0.0011824247,0.00088483706,0.0025817603,0.001093926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008444034,0.0006661707,0.00064643833,0.0019810542,0.0052486816,0.009794224,0.0014212,0.0076766224,0.0085503515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03559825,0.00048068495,0.0005231318,0.0020130859,0.016638828,0.018688617,0.00297557,0.008518839,0.0027051214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047175272,0.000015027791,0.00023373606,0.00017062669,0.0000183202,0.00017520686,0.011160898,0.00017728635,0.00017130742,0.8921017,0.08199019,0.0137385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040752973,0.000017534005,0.00023650135,0.0004406304,0.000020499368,0.00037441458,0.0044310824,0.00078118726,0.00057691714,0.6133356,0.3796969,0.00004795819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005574657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005467586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009794224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003937692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030954736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044656813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394855855","doi":"10.4000/aad.8017","title":"Michael A. Gilbert : Ne pas argumenter logiquement n’est pas illogique : il y a d’autres façons de communiquer des arguments","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03401115372825377,"score_gpt":0.31431158359014394,"score_spread":0.2803004298618902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394855855","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019677864,0.044779845,0.07101181,0.6781885,0.0056084073,0.00012707159,0.0002407103,0.00040638735,0.17995936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58948785,0.034199018,0.06846455,0.06905432,0.0030576785,0.00033430467,0.00025332658,0.00068315875,0.23446581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929229,0.004519,0.00022747785,0.00085801573,0.0012128624,0.000259617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98822623,0.00707057,0.00083886256,0.00073622836,0.0022858244,0.00084231846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059189005,0.0007361759,0.000629099,0.0018019831,0.005529957,0.009409544,0.0014646804,0.0055042603,0.009732937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020930307,0.00052552996,0.00059581746,0.0016124354,0.013852733,0.013108318,0.0037924284,0.00598876,0.0034716902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011882949,0.000030294083,0.0016466667,0.00048283034,0.000037402988,0.00041141387,0.02715196,0.00035254267,0.00088841293,0.82359964,0.11252414,0.0327558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003305328,0.000029284165,0.00087570865,0.0005343345,0.000031197964,0.00044829628,0.010044396,0.000806806,0.0013752873,0.35629684,0.6294583,0.00006649931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014509244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01912892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014509244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006057628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005537703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04395145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403706760","doi":"10.4000/12hvs","title":"Kock, Christian and Marcus Lantz (eds). 2023. Rhetorical Argumentation: The Copenhagen School (Windsor Ontario: Windsor Studies in Argumentation)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.038391136403030816,"score_gpt":0.36878564432487215,"score_spread":0.33039450792184133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403706760","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004647017,0.94737846,0.0013258671,0.015123277,0.001538516,0.000014183467,0.0001747801,0.000043794316,0.03393639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026440654,0.8805798,0.0026803657,0.0019937984,0.0011192699,0.00012711015,0.00043350886,0.00018126778,0.08644412],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975695,0.0007961189,0.0002446245,0.00034093417,0.00082344655,0.00022539047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636626,0.002015399,0.0004947622,0.0001809041,0.0006003192,0.00034233267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035358998,0.0021237836,0.0016496142,0.0040546497,0.003707478,0.013709805,0.0020853826,0.006138601,0.020546343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053980504,0.0023048213,0.0008434252,0.009320838,0.006855851,0.016900409,0.003055907,0.0046139807,0.018346867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014353514,0.000054809363,0.0012146492,0.002640753,0.000049520757,0.00026389532,0.019043028,0.00055383216,0.00028267695,0.136295,0.6036084,0.23584992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015331874,0.000009558823,0.001933803,0.003602525,0.000032733806,0.00018594797,0.004126969,0.00010547039,0.000098674034,0.028167171,0.96169835,0.00002346496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06967743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11022789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06967743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0133752385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014746152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13854367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}