{"meta":{"query_hash":"3ea7e74836a9","filters":{"venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours"},"cohort_total":28,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":28,"exported":28,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3ea7e74836a9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Argumentation+et+analyse+du+discours"},"results":[{"id":"W1518327270","doi":"10.4000/aad.556","title":"La normativité naturelle : une théorie de l’argumentation comme discipline engagée","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02437414218079427,"score_gpt":0.3299178772058468,"score_spread":0.30554373502505255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518327270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2756607,0.006593291,0.008134518,0.29738727,0.0021016535,0.0007834743,0.001067346,0.00022688454,0.40804487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97879696,0.001972853,0.00048618455,0.003028835,0.001766836,0.000025613468,0.0018163184,0.000046580964,0.012059835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967179,0.0006787702,0.000834901,0.0005030533,0.00063228706,0.0006331032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810743,0.00035339218,0.0005708384,0.00041401698,0.00026587603,0.0002884196],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011719678,0.0005205088,0.0005453836,0.00038962835,0.0011042305,0.001050098,0.0003199602,0.0001879701,0.0026135587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011888982,0.00049652223,0.00047821968,0.0003693933,0.00041698632,0.0010662131,0.00006427535,0.0006084761,0.00017781796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006627029,0.0013460787,0.0022430154,0.00005669053,0.0007081452,0.0000841777,0.043271706,0.0034324105,0.00014976005,0.927271,0.015105735,0.006264982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006244731,0.0009241551,0.022363018,0.00063004525,0.0092614265,0.000052506406,0.2829671,0.04583762,0.0012816766,0.47545058,0.15219167,0.0027954956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003065643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033674608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70313627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002862746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019938393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525681879","doi":"10.4000/aad.302","title":"Performance… et contre-performance communicationnelles : des stratégies argumentatives pour le débat politique télévisé","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04443329151310394,"score_gpt":0.3095437225943805,"score_spread":0.2651104310812766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525681879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86216277,0.003935087,0.00047690485,0.024733465,0.00035124316,0.00030609622,0.00035995385,0.000083352126,0.10759111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.937096,0.044296842,0.0011232266,0.0010383412,0.0006833385,0.00007695861,0.001082211,0.00006726703,0.014535794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674505,0.00056573073,0.0009635887,0.0005255977,0.00052372087,0.00067630934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976415,0.00032500178,0.0006202921,0.0005903146,0.00058099075,0.00024190811],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066201354,0.00058280764,0.0006394768,0.00040228234,0.0024516704,0.0006172589,0.0004979231,0.00011462744,0.0021260192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081659484,0.0005645789,0.00039777774,0.0002227706,0.0020620674,0.0020756815,0.00013036722,0.00037857916,0.0002251565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100535304,0.001609165,0.09586344,0.00023506183,0.0016400367,0.000031734646,0.1085316,0.007929652,0.0001388412,0.77633685,0.0058375457,0.0017455203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0062809964,0.00086081645,0.22130254,0.0011293478,0.0033581709,0.00009651089,0.64838547,0.06495926,0.0050679077,0.027225487,0.018474087,0.0028594416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016222762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00662679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74911135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020458538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006717054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572730762","doi":"10.4000/aad.1252","title":"Insulte, disqualification, persuasion et tropes communicationnels : à qui l’insulte profite-t-elle ?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04959784188851349,"score_gpt":0.3493032278127482,"score_spread":0.2997053859242347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572730762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5670613,0.034686357,0.006276735,0.17668104,0.003589567,0.0016781406,0.0020121147,0.00031299583,0.20770174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9690355,0.008841168,0.0006153465,0.0018013672,0.0019165006,0.00011728141,0.0035878513,0.00008121031,0.01400375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960749,0.00096149393,0.001081294,0.0004982033,0.00069808133,0.0006859938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99691164,0.00033405243,0.000824402,0.00088781863,0.0006725161,0.00036954856],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001684103,0.0005175606,0.0005481427,0.00041204877,0.0013893662,0.0008729433,0.0004992247,0.00013982481,0.0047216024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030218373,0.00047867512,0.0004373533,0.0003502947,0.0006409563,0.0019488522,0.00016941765,0.00036793604,0.00071277044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048362188,0.0019233465,0.021054626,0.00008896485,0.00074305007,0.0000025220766,0.091000594,0.00075533416,0.00015038787,0.875034,0.007847225,0.0013516134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032353632,0.00027422621,0.025098233,0.00046702492,0.005635795,0.000010389937,0.5426132,0.010906848,0.0008344667,0.011365073,0.39755678,0.002002585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005064988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019888105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8636689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021750992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016836409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1859937076","doi":"10.4000/aad.1787","title":"La rhétorique de la qualification et les controverses d’étiquetage","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017346894870144382,"score_gpt":0.33756022209762643,"score_spread":0.320213327227482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1859937076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2562113,0.0037429035,0.043975867,0.06085286,0.0011644418,0.000425675,0.00057129725,0.00017493716,0.63288075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98007965,0.0023821197,0.00033606772,0.0012222005,0.001303259,0.00004022181,0.00046297858,0.00004685209,0.014126662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601096,0.0024026523,0.00053101225,0.00038137753,0.00034898715,0.00032503056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756587,0.0012842175,0.00044713053,0.00030899883,0.00023158938,0.00016222753],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027334876,0.0003165071,0.0003822864,0.00023709639,0.0004596841,0.0011048435,0.00019623183,0.00019477533,0.0020293035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005693105,0.00030749707,0.00034457678,0.000096062664,0.0006168083,0.0004957216,0.000037456288,0.00034490472,0.00009889464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023278897,0.00039791147,0.004156026,0.000053852167,0.00048355557,0.000009691858,0.01755476,0.0014333493,0.00015531773,0.9680006,0.005655384,0.0020762705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016180667,0.00013307855,0.00528209,0.00017907622,0.002429599,0.0000069517946,0.087643035,0.013410547,0.00047067797,0.044642713,0.8434251,0.00075904565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0128946705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004998021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9233579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013100727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016495766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22849709","doi":"10.4000/aad.749","title":"Meyer, Michel. 2008. Principia Rhetorica. Une théorie générale de l’argumentation (Paris : Fayard)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Humanities; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.017982394316284078,"score_gpt":0.30466748325624365,"score_spread":0.2866850889399596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W22849709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2771045,0.01934743,0.008974863,0.2975943,0.0051383404,0.0015196328,0.0011142838,0.00040497724,0.38880166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94541174,0.005547236,0.0009934,0.0033388038,0.0029681802,0.00004501401,0.0014498042,0.00006574291,0.040180072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959439,0.0003645658,0.0011269714,0.00078999344,0.0008593544,0.0009152143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762905,0.00015011108,0.0007708605,0.00056532497,0.00045109875,0.00043358371],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082958414,0.00060987205,0.0007014155,0.00048262207,0.0010018266,0.0011208812,0.00038921364,0.00019519753,0.00548036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010559246,0.00065945927,0.0006318149,0.00049785327,0.0003667385,0.0011143226,0.00006165433,0.00039463013,0.00046692177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012462302,0.002084176,0.015706554,0.00008230981,0.0017406578,0.00013096872,0.025531651,0.0053891432,0.00046254537,0.83796054,0.105639726,0.005147083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0076566,0.001619855,0.03241268,0.0006099765,0.018491019,0.000043656568,0.1363594,0.03119798,0.0037484965,0.28968754,0.47368786,0.0044849603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009176937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025799538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66830724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005489208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035362525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555114952","doi":"10.4000/aad.2248","title":"Le « printemps érable » au Québec : « Grève » ou « boycott » ? Les enjeux stratégiques d’un conflit de nomination","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Nomination; Art; Law","score_opus":0.029145474671227866,"score_gpt":0.30033672909054904,"score_spread":0.2711912544193212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555114952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57402205,0.0033192202,0.013704126,0.26227048,0.00091234985,0.00048129747,0.00061105844,0.00013794545,0.14454144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709448,0.0014918062,0.00033711735,0.00048230507,0.0014468961,0.000054831864,0.00022730482,0.000057363424,0.02495755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972911,0.00035872494,0.00077301124,0.0005544475,0.00042892256,0.00059382245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793875,0.0002907736,0.0005534052,0.00038717917,0.0005777909,0.0002521202],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084686663,0.00041766107,0.00045833987,0.00031356656,0.0010278835,0.0006440534,0.0002906953,0.0001424832,0.005082623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002791672,0.0003453587,0.0004291059,0.00010528836,0.00059480366,0.00091290876,0.0000700106,0.00018061112,0.00020140367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004292394,0.00055967097,0.019477863,0.000062900646,0.0008901012,0.000027745156,0.015804853,0.00016544647,0.00047105865,0.95098096,0.0017591397,0.0097573325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007018772,0.0007635438,0.029122675,0.0013707887,0.0077904803,0.000032234926,0.3254145,0.005280972,0.02115774,0.15164052,0.4471307,0.003277048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31310597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32856452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7993404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018463816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W266986670","doi":"10.4000/aad.1978","title":"L’ethos collectif des guerrilla gardeners à Montréal : entre conflictualité et inclusion","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Urban Agriculture and Sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.02872784984303722,"score_gpt":0.2860743003259383,"score_spread":0.25734645048290106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W266986670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.906336,0.004132751,0.000087728724,0.07912899,0.00046467787,0.0004903616,0.00008560624,0.00007041447,0.009203475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701071,0.0008030904,0.00023588284,0.0024698272,0.00033366983,0.000034100965,0.00074611587,0.0000049877044,0.025265241],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964527,0.0011464639,0.0005478529,0.00059524627,0.000703574,0.00055418076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827266,0.000278757,0.0002839868,0.0001302973,0.00053332245,0.00050099095],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013696009,0.000388685,0.0004183233,0.000052200186,0.00075454335,0.00030506213,0.00029968348,0.00022631558,0.0013041062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027839062,0.00018601185,0.0003114632,0.0008554952,0.0003850337,0.0006945935,0.00041993574,0.00023360386,0.00013191863],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008000482,0.00334842,0.32408392,0.00018033119,0.001079442,0.00023667463,0.28419513,0.0068816426,0.014255463,0.0381892,0.24460159,0.08214813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026932943,0.0013348842,0.19317918,0.00018515601,0.00092810916,0.00006536837,0.4865288,0.0014517932,0.0028171702,0.038476232,0.27087364,0.0014663785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020882731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023573825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20233367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006434747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015983706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761116884","doi":"10.4000/aad.2420","title":"Une approche comparative des discours institutionnels en éducation aux médias : une analyse socio-anthropologique","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Education, sociology, and vocational training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3410631500394508,"score_gpt":0.5516588344486597,"score_spread":0.2105956844092089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761116884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6594255,0.00070485304,0.011198285,0.30733743,0.0028425443,0.0005152835,0.00007474759,0.00006772874,0.017833633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843258,0.003624892,0.004128611,0.0006690672,0.0021322386,0.0001835446,0.00080332014,0.000030062138,0.0041024256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99440074,0.0026787873,0.0007966662,0.00077966927,0.0006111198,0.00073299994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959045,0.001307473,0.0012672062,0.0005810176,0.0006368929,0.0003028825],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045988085,0.00047452652,0.00061968475,0.00024593275,0.0061699306,0.0005883114,0.00082558196,0.00037349307,0.00055413664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014540482,0.00048318252,0.00037386484,0.0007835641,0.0121262,0.00312582,0.0000974001,0.0004999961,0.00018719753],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000133005515,0.00072244764,0.059979733,0.000037839916,0.00068191026,0.0000026943317,0.44382656,0.001326783,0.00009988389,0.48785424,0.003224976,0.0022296284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062317046,0.0000836867,0.13695952,0.000111046684,0.0007175424,0.000003607262,0.7891179,0.00050869526,0.00015183231,0.069830626,0.0014172172,0.0004752077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034206443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020028897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41802362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010934031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021288958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892526192","doi":"10.4000/aad.2688","title":"Analyse de formules employées par le gouvernement et de leurs stratégies de cadrage sous-jacentes pendant le printemps érable québécois de 2012","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03169310465657911,"score_gpt":0.31144913596877766,"score_spread":0.27975603131219856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892526192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9344186,0.0040464033,0.014885349,0.017610412,0.00040105567,0.00035127407,0.00053124706,0.00011937275,0.027636252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825895,0.004321991,0.0015686051,0.0018774684,0.0012527173,0.0000746254,0.00044817736,0.00009526294,0.007771665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99603504,0.00061495614,0.00090301764,0.00066096155,0.0005398714,0.0012461307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977384,0.00020619069,0.00064201787,0.00052548456,0.00042799456,0.0004599073],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016551542,0.00060006627,0.0006537233,0.00043461763,0.0014319934,0.001367588,0.00048510815,0.0001525717,0.0015504324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019226134,0.0005959666,0.0006346231,0.00021586407,0.000847871,0.0011778183,0.00014979891,0.00035321232,0.00008630039],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015596232,0.002412146,0.12288865,0.00023283972,0.00408419,0.00015608287,0.11342473,0.011986722,0.0036926128,0.7111189,0.029067928,0.0007792499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003918001,0.00078506133,0.035174776,0.00070714875,0.00823044,0.000045044453,0.71141046,0.03509111,0.035191894,0.0640283,0.10286818,0.002549605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31220892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43496913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64709055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007844851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027778612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980608115","doi":"10.4000/aad.3585","title":"Querelles historiennes sur la Révolution française : l’argumentation par le chiffre des victimes et les polémiques sur la qualification génocidaire","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.01446165075572932,"score_gpt":0.25256976773247963,"score_spread":0.2381081169767503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980608115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8921059,0.015781889,0.00055441086,0.082605004,0.00055750733,0.0004100878,0.00016352911,0.00013980868,0.0076818783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9152609,0.014725066,0.00018964733,0.0002950974,0.00029898094,0.000083012426,0.00089025963,0.000052839467,0.06820418],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964366,0.0011689826,0.0008007595,0.0006248598,0.0005348484,0.0004339422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794054,0.00053237757,0.0006368544,0.0002703484,0.0004799464,0.00013994653],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073035795,0.00050040806,0.0006077204,0.00020575726,0.0027819036,0.0005073934,0.00022402893,0.00023248795,0.0013301308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011183327,0.00045267947,0.0005547355,0.0002715352,0.0007177726,0.0023425552,0.00006337483,0.00033335813,0.00013888188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015140705,0.001700406,0.066158436,0.0004406281,0.00194159,0.000014406146,0.46055,0.0014943625,0.0013069957,0.39001372,0.061497543,0.014730516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028394763,0.00035637853,0.04331058,0.0004611788,0.0024841288,0.0000088728075,0.21242982,0.0020403303,0.000511916,0.011231434,0.72253346,0.0017923904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0762029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053720795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66103595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012647443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014153347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092763271","doi":"10.4000/aad.4477","title":"La raison interculturelle et les conditions préliminaires de l’argumentation","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Argumentation theory; Philosophy; CONTEST; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03116105619235884,"score_gpt":0.36976634532505215,"score_spread":0.33860528913269333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092763271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.782088,0.003641658,0.026383461,0.15205841,0.00087676075,0.0007101853,0.00056320964,0.00018697062,0.033491366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98162985,0.00120213,0.0006347302,0.009927144,0.00034053207,0.0001600694,0.0030773557,0.000058170237,0.002970033],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958626,0.0022222665,0.00057152193,0.0005786486,0.0003435254,0.00042144366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867743,0.00032016615,0.00039035262,0.00021343565,0.00012822321,0.00027037578],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071490696,0.00036873657,0.00035010398,0.00018406771,0.00026153284,0.00027486376,0.00021305296,0.00028809556,0.006531031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001570128,0.00037879415,0.00032231866,0.0004595626,0.00026560365,0.00083037984,0.000049623504,0.00051387335,0.00072704075],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063719996,0.0031029535,0.026807629,0.00040861964,0.003077379,0.00043435578,0.49969432,0.0017238441,0.021388246,0.23645131,0.15132414,0.054950006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009357951,0.0011593542,0.102326,0.000511477,0.00562195,0.00021816799,0.8087907,0.0041250195,0.012280141,0.015753867,0.03817313,0.0016822383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015652772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090373855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3090964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001381131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011377332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097506787","doi":"10.4000/aad.4432","title":"Les régimes de rationalité en environnement à travers le prisme des valeurs","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.05820170062604697,"score_gpt":0.31213673103986883,"score_spread":0.25393503041382187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097506787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65800434,0.008021544,0.012226215,0.28550902,0.00048506472,0.00043499362,0.000094359246,0.00008212053,0.035142317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98634726,0.0049863155,0.0012708232,0.0019550135,0.0005649941,0.000035720986,0.0001073998,0.000019722744,0.0047127814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758935,0.0007995451,0.0003503579,0.00033901614,0.0005221049,0.00039962705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991983,0.00021150526,0.00019125776,0.000082601866,0.000060816892,0.00025552016],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006052922,0.00022153324,0.00026238317,0.000048343245,0.0009958963,0.00015184144,0.00022287651,0.00010463078,0.0011823834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016358933,0.00024260502,0.0002298392,0.00038191723,0.0009846675,0.0006114992,0.000050194154,0.00015750833,0.00009570301],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015554071,0.00031864474,0.056032613,0.000050857285,0.0006693933,0.000014978466,0.39483446,0.0021842523,0.00026475213,0.5087691,0.013855324,0.022990074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002133209,0.0002611604,0.18504947,0.00007927825,0.0010352867,0.0000013726121,0.6547618,0.0027302199,0.00065373443,0.035632364,0.11679955,0.00086255063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024659239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069811656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47313675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006088171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027240804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3104092441","doi":"10.4000/aad.4696","title":"Les raisonnements contrefactuels dans l’histoire","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Ethnology; History","score_opus":0.03275369177592694,"score_gpt":0.27050986320654896,"score_spread":0.23775617143062203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3104092441","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23094057,0.00707958,0.0009540303,0.74282366,0.0007808911,0.0002713655,0.00028976786,0.00008400261,0.016776133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9554238,0.002519571,0.00005429177,0.0033567848,0.00078283687,0.000028630975,0.0003215715,0.000029298515,0.037483234],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791425,0.00022078548,0.00057210756,0.00045095064,0.0004620423,0.00037985106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901116,0.00007695224,0.00032186756,0.00013401768,0.0001750133,0.00028101192],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013391367,0.00035797217,0.0005203339,0.000054234075,0.0047593904,0.00030915308,0.0002207748,0.000081289545,0.006463957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051645708,0.00029899488,0.0005374966,0.00016840192,0.0006031445,0.0005522631,0.00007223881,0.00022230577,0.00033329797],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059265767,0.0005703919,0.009895932,0.00013303423,0.0027263362,0.00006236632,0.62258345,0.0006866429,0.0002540458,0.2729083,0.07236992,0.01775029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017750844,0.00030687422,0.0024189516,0.00007077356,0.0030685656,0.0000012022216,0.33960706,0.0012702672,0.000072424125,0.0019918508,0.64854246,0.00087448565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014074433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010369372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73946685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014097121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027067736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W313229293","doi":"10.4000/aad.1969","title":"De l’appel à mobilisation à ses mécanismes sociodiscursifs : le cas des slogans écrits du printemps érable","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05480768441524738,"score_gpt":0.32069413989507656,"score_spread":0.2658864554798292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W313229293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80258656,0.0057343333,0.008206801,0.073550835,0.0016711996,0.00057514675,0.0006265106,0.00016363156,0.10688501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740853,0.0013962277,0.00072549185,0.0007140511,0.0017056364,0.000058667352,0.00068100414,0.000064205175,0.020569457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709356,0.00043751588,0.0006916527,0.0005500912,0.00056514016,0.0006620364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786544,0.00016276249,0.00041901128,0.00036004648,0.0007672647,0.00042546823],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012184265,0.0004478098,0.0004967876,0.0003067629,0.0010683557,0.0012179897,0.00029055134,0.0001342032,0.0015307716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034812413,0.00043784443,0.00041317078,0.00019407958,0.0010005698,0.001195477,0.000095070165,0.00023553177,0.00022234063],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053697328,0.0011111394,0.028100222,0.00013508063,0.0010688291,0.000062918,0.18386038,0.010623058,0.0001045385,0.755639,0.017810892,0.0014302304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025673863,0.0003289426,0.0040048333,0.0002933286,0.0037804013,0.000032994303,0.7561055,0.018884143,0.001253576,0.14167503,0.06988617,0.0011877416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038362473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024906209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.613964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062435056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008674058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153348501","doi":"10.4000/aad.5418","title":"La polémique autour de bonjour/hi sur le web : vers la déconstruction du discours d’autorité","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016117215364328547,"score_gpt":0.27382588165056615,"score_spread":0.2577086662862376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153348501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65061057,0.003954633,0.0021071003,0.14222069,0.003407937,0.00032234204,0.0009804433,0.00020191546,0.19619438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973714,0.004207609,0.0004905171,0.0007743933,0.0027170333,0.000036340745,0.00079098827,0.00009221769,0.017176885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598515,0.0011263066,0.00084388454,0.0007394697,0.0006056064,0.0006995939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976278,0.00041803834,0.00055062695,0.00048289006,0.00055388606,0.00036673862],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011243614,0.0005614751,0.00065482676,0.0004034809,0.0009725725,0.0017792173,0.00028632395,0.00026719857,0.0038861432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032700575,0.0005983782,0.0007606612,0.00033720332,0.0008310367,0.0010754092,0.00011778862,0.00055714406,0.00011671131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041261632,0.001018757,0.013392342,0.00009660361,0.001671903,0.00063405104,0.013584591,0.0029648896,0.0003735218,0.9535056,0.0101316245,0.0025848944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005848611,0.0001870296,0.009617323,0.00067530794,0.008596192,0.00040778166,0.38137385,0.031478617,0.001685958,0.05568009,0.50209856,0.0023506403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013625655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012989716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8978255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039307267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022359171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206035181","doi":"10.4000/aad.5483","title":"Discours du tourisme diasporique : l’exemple d’une visite louisianaise en Acadie","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Université Sainte-Anne","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Geography; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.008672682309734493,"score_gpt":0.2780925566760386,"score_spread":0.2694198743663041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206035181","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39563712,0.009487963,0.0014942196,0.55044526,0.0035621086,0.0004145766,0.00048227713,0.00009878327,0.03837769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89202267,0.011135039,0.000258971,0.0030724236,0.0016318896,0.00004111742,0.0005952208,0.000058295835,0.091184385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962141,0.0009019372,0.00062685204,0.00071243907,0.0008135724,0.0007311296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981378,0.00023464859,0.00038489417,0.0004106663,0.00020584521,0.00062616885],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009029905,0.00034109777,0.0004927615,0.0006959785,0.0013568046,0.0009959771,0.0004015764,0.00026999175,0.008647387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019043642,0.00046606635,0.0005036581,0.0020641764,0.0009938705,0.0018342581,0.00010018491,0.00043554718,0.00082730554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050796098,0.0010206739,0.022342103,0.00013039418,0.0010186705,0.0018943384,0.24761112,0.001788708,0.00032022977,0.3471879,0.3412884,0.035346676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001071099,0.000069603455,0.04139608,0.00015810631,0.0011055474,0.00002599157,0.13548194,0.00038903192,0.00012769684,0.013033994,0.8062446,0.0008962795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.404693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82469857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5473728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001968481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017652771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207035486","doi":"10.4000/aad.5779","title":"L’analphabétisme au sein d’une communauté linguistique minoritaire : la construction du sujet en problème social (1984-1998)","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Functional illiteracy; Subject (documents); Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.022101427271501797,"score_gpt":0.31544447911845774,"score_spread":0.29334305184695597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207035486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59014064,0.003814582,0.0027164866,0.18004405,0.0049994844,0.0006835137,0.0017761794,0.0002318809,0.21559319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787358,0.0012255867,0.0006535407,0.0007936614,0.0070194793,0.000052278134,0.0028554637,0.0000800812,0.008584088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995845,0.0011111328,0.0010423638,0.00068997586,0.0006670119,0.00064450974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753565,0.00047671582,0.0006610986,0.00041941972,0.0006766984,0.0002304115],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091984967,0.0005781451,0.0007819418,0.0003314127,0.0018062643,0.0012090543,0.0003142844,0.00028287442,0.0024109962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035404076,0.0006253108,0.0007273024,0.00039846418,0.0010545362,0.0005459562,0.00016764236,0.000565603,0.00017899506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041340874,0.00092541595,0.013323509,0.00016448513,0.0019255943,0.0005293358,0.0866516,0.00052800565,0.000057430545,0.8883008,0.004434438,0.003118038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004874192,0.000292617,0.017038919,0.0008208317,0.012821653,0.000254573,0.6249978,0.015317463,0.0007487689,0.10010072,0.21999511,0.0027373561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022425953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041606136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7882001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043540026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008467057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242785050","doi":"10.4000/aad.4867","title":"Guylaine Martel, 2018. Incarner la politique. La construction de l’image médiatique des femmes et des hommes politiques au Québec (Laval : PUL)","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.028792754383238604,"score_gpt":0.32059363004950847,"score_spread":0.2918008756662699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242785050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7452982,0.0021718321,0.00096732745,0.21629898,0.00021937853,0.00020801225,0.0002627763,0.000102737424,0.034470726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98106897,0.00953289,0.0016255793,0.0035051184,0.000553903,0.00003712522,0.00014430884,0.00004417283,0.003487907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596995,0.0021391616,0.00046561507,0.0004180523,0.0003795432,0.0006276794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837,0.00035437627,0.00030844565,0.00015340104,0.00018652459,0.0006272682],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010752951,0.0002860821,0.00035744728,0.00037575324,0.0010961703,0.00096032966,0.00025256368,0.00022921793,0.0010341052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047186995,0.00036758327,0.00028151425,0.000572082,0.0042788615,0.0020529095,0.000059599988,0.0003566017,0.00007776173],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007345354,0.00028443563,0.18011107,0.00024629486,0.00045837363,0.00012371471,0.32536897,0.00015101365,0.0006053775,0.4297972,0.045541175,0.017238911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015228983,0.00026996844,0.34044385,0.000295697,0.0012114377,0.00009626888,0.3771358,0.00041375976,0.0009362924,0.05426944,0.22210473,0.0012998685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9567341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9798168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37552777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030500402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054127593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366121855","doi":"10.4000/aad.7259","title":"François-Emmanuël Boucher. 2020. Le Trumpisme. Contribution à l’analyse rhétorique du discours national-populiste (Québec : P. U. Laval).","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02003588531987089,"score_gpt":0.2985178311712517,"score_spread":0.2784819458513808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366121855","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38417256,0.011728832,0.0019311832,0.5479207,0.005212326,0.0012819805,0.0038622273,0.00061256293,0.043277618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93215066,0.006682305,0.000061569495,0.0016000776,0.0054808827,0.00017368603,0.00709981,0.00013608261,0.046614908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99367845,0.0007109782,0.0016472352,0.0011886586,0.0016510105,0.0011236778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995799,0.0005054163,0.0010845604,0.00064297975,0.0014513031,0.00051674346],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002087464,0.0008977295,0.0011075145,0.0008408213,0.0020950672,0.0014015833,0.00056847656,0.00029698873,0.0045779794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079412473,0.00090349244,0.001243099,0.0010292461,0.000893446,0.001513731,0.00019799513,0.0005823864,0.0013949155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000127153,0.001067278,0.015533812,0.00012231267,0.0033958107,0.00022565063,0.016074883,0.010211387,0.00021473337,0.75035,0.20206696,0.0006099968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006493026,0.00040530373,0.02288767,0.00051581225,0.0095845,0.000032368604,0.14638552,0.06556525,0.0010265028,0.06756264,0.67616343,0.0033780057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14029513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25053117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68278736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016126673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366122265","doi":"10.4000/aad.7276","title":"L’« argument de la nature » dans le discours fasciste du 20e siècle en Allemagne, en Italie et en France","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.00811859375037639,"score_gpt":0.29846462672187485,"score_spread":0.29034603297149847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366122265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5281739,0.0039097494,0.0022254551,0.25870872,0.002330102,0.00077336334,0.0018953785,0.0003243001,0.201659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9450101,0.005220975,0.0002885411,0.0017770568,0.002219864,0.00011696443,0.0019143691,0.00012420816,0.043327898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99487364,0.0015535767,0.00087717356,0.00087207183,0.0009444341,0.0008791044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731326,0.0010263012,0.0004824035,0.0006090555,0.00022434293,0.00034463374],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026846305,0.00067610823,0.00070676423,0.00052457006,0.0011176748,0.0013773146,0.00064223784,0.00037509605,0.0019154438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037688742,0.00065672415,0.00072701415,0.00045842578,0.0007758511,0.00095987343,0.00024654006,0.00083943456,0.00048455913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033187873,0.0007945516,0.0104961265,0.0001107689,0.0014144211,0.00027067369,0.053496167,0.012822083,0.0002715229,0.89660865,0.023087969,0.0005938875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00441769,0.00037485798,0.076942034,0.00057965016,0.0057484414,0.000041422587,0.45494044,0.034522828,0.0010269333,0.07410968,0.34461817,0.0026778444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007420425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005144445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.822499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035574788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004769024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387670712","doi":"10.4000/aad.7658","title":"Élaboration et légitimation de l’identité francophone dans le manifeste littéraire. J’parle mal, pis j’aime ça de Joëlle Préfontaine","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.01617509606465875,"score_gpt":0.29605638237640414,"score_spread":0.27988128631174536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387670712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8500747,0.0021323366,0.021807838,0.06991758,0.0018897732,0.00078182924,0.0010901102,0.0003688867,0.05193692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9491399,0.002779615,0.0005915962,0.0011464457,0.0022285501,0.00012661776,0.003530478,0.00009233582,0.040364478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967046,0.0005296095,0.00086302025,0.000572274,0.0006319134,0.00069860613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998174,0.00020517159,0.0005529764,0.00043356858,0.00038306386,0.00025118247],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016034502,0.00043199369,0.0004763212,0.0005569538,0.0011124299,0.0012230772,0.00027921284,0.00015440855,0.0024816042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024429822,0.0004719069,0.0003796431,0.0007127395,0.00031051014,0.0014359907,0.00009640749,0.00027449892,0.0007077611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009026396,0.0011469614,0.02459762,0.00029204725,0.0014809961,0.00031004523,0.065843254,0.050125804,0.002587326,0.81601954,0.03597014,0.0015359943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004596586,0.0005326302,0.0960151,0.000744546,0.0048955395,0.000046940266,0.40295628,0.34479323,0.005262181,0.090889364,0.046736628,0.0025309704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034180246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044427536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7251302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040449685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006011618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394843562","doi":"10.4000/aad.8154","title":"Marc Angenot : La rhétorique à l’épreuve de l’histoire des idées","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.034737108043101324,"score_gpt":0.32040975875858646,"score_spread":0.28567265071548514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394843562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16030292,0.08263187,0.0047890176,0.050165217,0.0036983571,0.00041744707,0.0012439683,0.0003412173,0.69641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.916262,0.0057102707,0.0003251969,0.0005679591,0.002298106,0.00004407707,0.00040479394,0.00007614545,0.07431145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975529,0.00045885544,0.0005303629,0.0005229201,0.0004040135,0.00053100614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874306,0.00036550808,0.00015167963,0.00029442308,0.00020560254,0.00023975667],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091714907,0.00039959172,0.00037430687,0.00041967892,0.0008687185,0.0019058961,0.00023643799,0.00017989591,0.005673729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012784191,0.00038007722,0.00051355985,0.00024292407,0.0009866563,0.00072888745,0.00007092234,0.00041934752,0.0002995683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018484925,0.00032327112,0.001698574,0.00028563978,0.0013129641,0.00032612626,0.044929937,0.0006817193,0.0001190024,0.9282444,0.014138213,0.007921636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063396426,0.00021500363,0.0016155264,0.00095717586,0.0065238895,0.00004527827,0.11908001,0.014593717,0.0003963992,0.14098479,0.71377724,0.0011769839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00962318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009526145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78725964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045447997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003290444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394843699","doi":"10.4000/aad.8254","title":"Christopher Tindale : Explorer les fondements culturels de la rhétorique et de la raison","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.02059401128701753,"score_gpt":0.36318925942309443,"score_spread":0.3425952481360769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394843699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32666573,0.021944473,0.008560219,0.03136132,0.0020821646,0.00042067695,0.0006122116,0.0002500785,0.60810316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96283937,0.004783717,0.00041072184,0.0010006146,0.0020167432,0.00007417509,0.00040382732,0.000074022675,0.028396828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971953,0.0010125657,0.00047917408,0.00046398575,0.00040516007,0.00044383475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881816,0.00046219103,0.00017781465,0.00023326503,0.00011785239,0.00019072038],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016024907,0.0003742433,0.0003352558,0.00024916214,0.00047218698,0.0020767956,0.00020637775,0.00019789739,0.006356062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014109528,0.00033861378,0.00044153817,0.00015894498,0.00052757,0.0005816655,0.00006247096,0.00045361512,0.00015878389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019071127,0.0004447815,0.0058453013,0.00013730631,0.0012260678,0.00017323988,0.07065148,0.0015980906,0.0002825485,0.87638825,0.041740317,0.0014935512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079852494,0.00009014457,0.0025836043,0.00045117413,0.003002385,0.000017839484,0.06288158,0.0058366726,0.0006347309,0.051199198,0.87182057,0.00068355934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069993385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011991957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8300803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000341584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003996137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394843725","doi":"10.4000/aad.8277","title":"Christopher Tindale: Exploring the Cultural Foundations of Rhetoric and Reason","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Sociology; Political science; Aesthetics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0875440387876914,"score_gpt":0.33046826536769125,"score_spread":0.24292422657999985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394843725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93413264,0.0037549005,0.00023238106,0.013068766,0.00067135406,0.00015034426,0.000019663887,0.000074236144,0.047895707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938777,0.0017594894,0.000038406666,0.00007325717,0.00014493392,0.00006404393,0.000038824368,0.000007638977,0.0039956677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994415,0.0000591654,0.00018189596,0.00010743706,0.00013810498,0.00007188023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958664,0.00011760473,0.00006396643,0.00013714485,0.00007663973,0.000018023418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016652467,0.000079258614,0.000093888055,0.00005461827,0.00035137398,0.00023136457,0.000087586544,0.0000076247916,0.00029996742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016591028,0.000049390423,0.000057848058,0.00008365866,0.00019139044,0.00055932807,0.00003925394,0.00006742793,0.000022625003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052436635,0.000036090427,0.0012269752,0.000024293637,0.000246721,6.511907e-7,0.1796478,0.000022252816,0.000059867358,0.801461,0.008495406,0.00877369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037792715,0.00007327717,0.019062396,0.00013751037,0.0005557143,0.0000049345986,0.5057214,0.0011535366,0.00018272546,0.008244042,0.46416077,0.0003257597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003236066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003693308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79321694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002595777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017469827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3284433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394843729","doi":"10.4000/aad.8174","title":"Marc Angenot: Rhetoric put to the test by the History of Ideas","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Pathos; Ethos; Persuasion; Epistemology; Sociology; Object (grammar); Logos Bible Software; Perspective (graphical); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.025982262173351544,"score_gpt":0.2848077668052255,"score_spread":0.258825504631874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394843729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13825674,0.03308531,0.0022604626,0.24135391,0.0105511,0.0014429451,0.0014842004,0.00031099742,0.5712543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9647959,0.00016495225,0.000018731027,0.0014303939,0.0007703981,0.000037464117,0.000111520254,0.000020122867,0.032650538],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889773,0.000072074654,0.00029833516,0.00021572897,0.00035521146,0.00016089588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991666,0.00027188848,0.00010241934,0.00028026913,0.00012177217,0.0000570234],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043558513,0.00014183758,0.0001569105,0.00013801715,0.00018514419,0.00025021468,0.0002576184,0.000017432005,0.0026523613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010826939,0.000077994526,0.0001930282,0.0001254098,0.00018053009,0.00015108165,0.000043427455,0.00009930697,0.00016136905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064070427,0.0001052531,0.0005486754,0.000020824804,0.00038025144,0.0000055836704,0.04416817,0.00020306178,0.00019569148,0.3562781,0.5966759,0.0014120924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014581224,0.000074089345,0.00033005635,0.00003745685,0.0011662381,0.0000013177622,0.02791676,0.0028340304,0.00009941919,0.0080245705,0.9591424,0.00022785975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022057933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003932958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82653916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015393476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013851491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99825937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394843815","doi":"10.4000/aad.8119","title":"Michael A. Gilbert: Not arguing logically is not illogical: Other ways of communicating arguments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.126980649537492,"score_gpt":0.3387212657828483,"score_spread":0.21174061624535628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394843815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77914953,0.00070230244,0.0030752555,0.12515374,0.001022711,0.00060067594,0.0003326668,0.00032320403,0.08963991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96763605,0.00013964828,0.00087076455,0.028785901,0.00025859888,0.000029092642,0.00012415215,0.000038883114,0.002116895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802506,0.00024086336,0.00065518735,0.00038334544,0.0003972196,0.0002983033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859476,0.00048120413,0.00028859198,0.00040840195,0.00015827762,0.00006874324],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077116163,0.00025536813,0.00039660616,0.00016751906,0.00029181858,0.00025337096,0.00035844877,0.00010123501,0.00122108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006732406,0.00020266356,0.00031718088,0.000105451516,0.0005782718,0.0004432698,0.00010265595,0.00041686255,0.00013273623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036827994,0.000275597,0.0010957364,0.0001644504,0.000736975,0.000017227787,0.13467331,0.00007942223,0.0059513142,0.8504384,0.004139887,0.002390817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00406706,0.0011226421,0.0035531526,0.0015885876,0.0036501724,0.000029731747,0.21606202,0.017571975,0.04334628,0.23330314,0.472346,0.0033592302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066445296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005225812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6171353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048497077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004479654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394855855","doi":"10.4000/aad.8017","title":"Michael A. Gilbert : Ne pas argumenter logiquement n’est pas illogique : il y a d’autres façons de communiquer des arguments","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03401115372825377,"score_gpt":0.31431158359014394,"score_spread":0.2803004298618902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394855855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5828728,0.027386766,0.0123563325,0.13154833,0.004404224,0.0017086043,0.003094595,0.0006213881,0.23600698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93362004,0.015935443,0.0013640993,0.0049260277,0.0016615944,0.00024125913,0.0015610022,0.00014387116,0.04054669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950612,0.0009331876,0.0012333655,0.0009146124,0.0007170518,0.0011405689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760216,0.00045159037,0.00038325123,0.00074376696,0.00036741933,0.00045179532],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014418396,0.0008775398,0.0007754165,0.00071393757,0.0011673215,0.002486254,0.00058306754,0.0002554776,0.009252778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011999692,0.0008029565,0.00090146146,0.00034958686,0.0011950467,0.0010577934,0.00029268896,0.0007340625,0.00035656214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008048691,0.00203624,0.012481226,0.0005068158,0.0051472406,0.00043261817,0.0751597,0.0019590142,0.0002934853,0.8749022,0.019640671,0.0073603117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017396478,0.0006592225,0.002328904,0.0019005054,0.007981275,0.00005074839,0.13660899,0.01974172,0.0012911389,0.0747751,0.7508914,0.002031375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015065619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030051095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8001271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080003624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004492778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403706760","doi":"10.4000/12hvs","title":"Kock, Christian and Marcus Lantz (eds). 2023. Rhetorical Argumentation: The Copenhagen School (Windsor Ontario: Windsor Studies in Argumentation)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.038391136403030816,"score_gpt":0.36878564432487215,"score_spread":0.33039450792184133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403706760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722398,0.00979579,0.0004386788,0.0076454342,0.0016763792,0.00094413874,0.0000798084,0.000110426074,0.0070695607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846144,0.0006609068,0.00017976107,0.0015978201,0.0003181541,0.00048571333,0.00060139305,0.000045114182,0.0114967935],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969893,0.0005619999,0.0007228994,0.00075272215,0.00053094054,0.0004421536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988016,0.00038149842,0.00020016963,0.0003401499,0.000111946465,0.00016465309],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000932163,0.00038348665,0.00041093343,0.00039621763,0.0002869717,0.00044399835,0.00022347132,0.000117340576,0.009157401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008235545,0.00028843887,0.00016828415,0.00076151383,0.00020758859,0.0008484616,0.00007640297,0.0004495753,0.001463802],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012570875,0.0020098493,0.2486944,0.00045883903,0.009583619,0.0020185313,0.41230932,0.0003209836,0.0037086604,0.05012207,0.23507951,0.034437135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055704373,0.00047059375,0.62456024,0.00036511346,0.002252823,0.00021830869,0.34332064,0.0004717136,0.0008342488,0.008764018,0.01192689,0.0012449775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012082897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025935726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37586585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039437332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001791545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}