{"meta":{"query_hash":"dc03d5abaf91","filters":{"venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/dc03d5abaf91","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Artificial+Intelligence+and+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1531887372","doi":"10.1023/a:1013803600690","title":"Douglas Walton, The New Dialectic. Conversational Contexts of Argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press (Book Review)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.03570576855092915,"score_gpt":0.2717127328523034,"score_spread":0.23600696430137424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531887372","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00378436,0.37701347,0.5789651,0.0054044677,0.002295331,0.0020699839,0.000017504435,0.000103673076,0.0303461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93337226,0.062111065,0.00057083933,0.0011915185,0.00018309994,0.000002478696,0.0000047028793,0.000006194346,0.0025578416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991621,0.00008049604,0.00027244666,0.00018057559,0.0001906526,0.00011373165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927574,0.000112415575,0.00018139686,0.00026048446,0.00011388135,0.000056061217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025456413,0.00007918794,0.00015845158,0.0000030948977,0.000104990824,0.00001980476,0.00031057108,0.000035467096,0.0005481735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019354202,0.000064015345,0.000052947904,0.000035335386,0.00010002137,0.00054990535,0.000069192865,0.00003318787,0.0000089842215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006235912,0.00013999642,0.00016457656,0.00014837034,0.00006559498,0.0000037177103,0.0060026124,0.00006815482,0.0011001679,0.8782833,0.030954624,0.08300649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001612818,0.00024267803,0.0008279436,0.00042926613,0.00006302907,0.000010286599,0.00054662966,0.01088871,0.021053577,0.0033575527,0.96214473,0.0002743026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047883905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021580208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93119013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004297985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004262695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982329760","doi":"10.1023/b:arti.0000046007.11806.9a","title":"Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and Generalisations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":192,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Defeasible reasoning; Defeasible estate; Underpinning; Epistemology; Probabilistic argumentation; Computer science; Empirical evidence; Deductive reasoning; Model-based reasoning; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Engineering; Knowledge representation and reasoning","score_opus":0.09223170808788776,"score_gpt":0.33048547986861676,"score_spread":0.23825377178072898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982329760","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3415566,0.0006743489,0.6566121,0.00019268352,0.0001743774,0.00015653027,0.0000013355136,0.000023295257,0.0006087364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852991,0.00020189333,0.014299007,0.00012721306,0.000033543307,0.0000125301885,0.0000013687601,0.0000031937902,0.000022163687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991362,0.00005521409,0.00029433722,0.00020274839,0.00016505687,0.00014644764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995431,0.000055586872,0.00011406561,0.000149379,0.000088573186,0.000049320395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046523442,0.00008098004,0.00010579147,0.000049721744,0.00019272466,0.00014558941,0.00010315392,0.00004164474,0.000019534742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000786195,0.00007310703,0.000024492057,0.00015345226,0.00007060725,0.0011631696,0.00003825733,0.00004524573,0.0000056018816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030422677,0.000017822638,0.00075157057,0.00001920376,0.000006569777,4.935931e-7,0.0020139695,0.000112619055,0.0042908075,0.960088,0.000009403808,0.03268649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012903968,0.00028437993,0.0059641646,0.00043684331,0.000041891122,0.000034574634,0.0021147395,0.23011728,0.68628454,0.069848664,0.0042013456,0.00054252805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005258329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016221672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89023936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013892913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032214066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2981218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039190550","doi":"10.1007/s10506-010-9093-9","title":"Evaluation of information retrieval for E-discovery","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Open Text (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Information retrieval; Data science; Context (archaeology); Precision and recall; Question answering","score_opus":0.07755438895016285,"score_gpt":0.33809230550115454,"score_spread":0.2605379165509917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039190550","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26782674,0.0000116465835,0.7283528,0.00038511545,0.0005357733,0.0004692393,0.000011655902,0.000032102664,0.002374971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952688,0.000003520725,0.0045157443,0.00014312383,0.000035925135,0.000011016202,0.000008169855,0.0000015018036,0.000012194993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896944,0.000024964664,0.00031851037,0.00008493639,0.00047721202,0.00012493391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998844,0.00008057685,0.00009695977,0.00017789935,0.00075885875,0.000041658855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001930998,0.000058205937,0.00007553308,0.00007266951,0.000118968994,0.00020638076,0.00020927395,0.000057280977,0.000020601905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027269687,0.0000503968,0.000037145594,0.00019130978,0.00009592762,0.0027616995,0.000048477246,0.0000870203,0.000020985928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014883961,0.0000140611255,0.0000061399533,0.0000070318038,0.0000025029167,2.75796e-8,0.000528876,0.000038604998,0.0037508507,0.7896446,0.000012154998,0.20598026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073696225,0.00017819359,0.00020845141,0.000007760588,0.000023860828,0.000003334905,0.00024046794,0.28968218,0.5024339,0.20391774,0.0031004478,0.00012998204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047042377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005265773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7274421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009563576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009871759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20551218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046836002","doi":"10.1007/s10506-012-9120-0","title":"A Carneades reconstruction of Popov v Hayashi","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Argument map; Computer science; Legal aspects of computing; Visualization; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; The Internet; World Wide Web; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07958655965729128,"score_gpt":0.2932689512155651,"score_spread":0.21368239155827384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046836002","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45225814,0.000532661,0.54008067,0.00029593127,0.0013836361,0.00019782851,0.0000022298632,0.00007355558,0.0051753786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651366,0.00002029042,0.003236014,0.00006462072,0.0001238828,0.0000040755644,6.72517e-7,0.0000028451598,0.000033962544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993171,0.000040289367,0.00024545033,0.00013327206,0.00010551657,0.00015836894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995917,0.00004296705,0.00009028012,0.00016697483,0.000044658813,0.00006343838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027025532,0.00006535197,0.00010106565,0.000042449796,0.000088120156,0.000043548083,0.00012344136,0.000045599114,0.00002906436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017070379,0.000057567657,0.00003134069,0.0001323889,0.00007625514,0.0006114738,0.00003801619,0.00004531907,0.00003994645],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002649752,0.000034200333,0.00170101,0.000012268792,0.000005676833,2.259944e-7,0.0017607773,0.000011474758,0.005588973,0.83384055,0.000019173829,0.15702303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000489146,0.0001628053,0.0033015006,0.00010286811,0.00002002935,0.000071057824,0.0015070756,0.029054053,0.9118618,0.049564127,0.0039058058,0.00039996425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047239888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001005663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9062728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008541031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008332844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23475409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061085701","doi":"10.1007/s10506-013-9151-1","title":"Baseballs and arguments from fairness","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Epistemology; Computer science; Scheme (mathematics); Legal aspects of computing; Philosophy of law; Informal logic; Basis (linear algebra); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; The Internet","score_opus":0.04394982316286884,"score_gpt":0.2628262240864747,"score_spread":0.21887640092360588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061085701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52731395,0.00019365422,0.4692971,0.00093372155,0.00041775667,0.00028199886,0.000003356911,0.000070054346,0.0014883779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972875,0.00003204907,0.0020161036,0.00046809198,0.000070942944,0.00001648939,0.0000028442048,0.0000038470575,0.000102117105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991856,0.000036900015,0.00020927569,0.00028882024,0.0001245033,0.00015490249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995439,0.00007034589,0.000052173767,0.00020067392,0.000041796582,0.00009109132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011074766,0.0000920227,0.00010419527,0.00002697942,0.00013706916,0.00033067525,0.00017252046,0.00004609472,0.00012907706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009810977,0.00007843627,0.000018002938,0.000079205136,0.00005736412,0.00065428327,0.000095423704,0.00004953728,0.00028956786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027134804,0.00005990641,0.0015646566,0.000009885534,0.0000152306075,0.0000037269065,0.0015780209,0.000016139717,0.007250718,0.7629002,0.0002143819,0.22638448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013207682,0.00019260647,0.01997385,0.00012479388,0.000020546177,0.000010121489,0.0010188954,0.30715,0.1820676,0.4809015,0.0075918403,0.00081613194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045786602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027887654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46997353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006990663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006207713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6921595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071805340","doi":"10.1007/s10506-006-9014-0","title":"Persuasion Dialogue in Online Dispute Resolution","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Negotiation; Argumentation theory; Online dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Dispute resolution; Legal aspects of computing; Computer science; Conflict resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Epistemology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; The Internet; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07303214965820533,"score_gpt":0.30446472382580814,"score_spread":0.23143257416760282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071805340","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39255345,0.00032671148,0.6016152,0.0036413358,0.00048384367,0.00026458362,0.0000048941265,0.000099312885,0.0010106787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953518,0.00007463894,0.003952029,0.00035695563,0.0002040452,0.000005367446,0.0000078518815,0.000003833333,0.00004349738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906886,0.000054206877,0.00028668356,0.0002719364,0.00013242612,0.0001858623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962485,0.00004477927,0.00005300292,0.00019287704,0.000028845332,0.000055639077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026090577,0.00008544594,0.00010102556,0.000070489754,0.000111164314,0.00008541474,0.00018200917,0.00005856626,0.000012299889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020262223,0.00007718089,0.000027701504,0.00019511321,0.0000448268,0.0005228136,0.000070777634,0.00008647846,0.0000802398],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009097911,0.00015229172,0.00032145518,0.0000065542745,0.0000023172006,0.000004258761,0.001908914,0.0012356435,0.0021316034,0.75178885,0.000056213084,0.24238278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076541,0.0001278404,0.004788415,0.0000759005,0.0000042358797,0.000009165557,0.00035455005,0.945737,0.015755238,0.01653364,0.016232543,0.0003049108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008756744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006470386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9445014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003354721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011783713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3610627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080571997","doi":"10.1007/s10506-012-9132-9","title":"The epistemology of scientific evidence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Scientific evidence; Argument (complex analysis); Credibility; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Empirical evidence; Component (thermodynamics); Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.19274562134031445,"score_gpt":0.4056515266181242,"score_spread":0.21290590527780975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080571997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85713893,0.011959015,0.007978884,0.014749466,0.008898391,0.0012727128,0.0000094417255,0.0002103046,0.09778283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980025,0.000411822,0.0002026186,0.0001610151,0.0004239951,0.000017745828,5.9903545e-7,0.000009759249,0.0007699318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762106,0.0003879644,0.000557641,0.00025666985,0.00045564972,0.0007210303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704456,0.0019168921,0.00017770723,0.00037017124,0.00027190888,0.00021873096],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004418465,0.00012644408,0.00017816876,0.000053318476,0.0026596845,0.00024889436,0.0005167465,0.00012207363,0.00021727219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013208742,0.00009673363,0.000079865684,0.0005034528,0.0077681835,0.0007349232,0.000113049486,0.00016498008,0.00027000904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021543581,0.00004561626,0.0011197799,0.0000053356794,0.000007451944,5.87855e-7,0.0079834955,0.0000054450693,0.0010339546,0.9227421,0.000118289645,0.06691637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009095726,0.00014090023,0.00036395615,0.00011022736,0.00004743375,0.0000066556654,0.030915614,0.0002069334,0.1299115,0.50639975,0.33148077,0.0004071628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004467623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014187992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41634238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004348136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000114416885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092547615","doi":"10.1007/s10506-009-9082-z","title":"Meta-relation and ontology closure in Conceptual Structure Theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Relation (database); Computer science; Process ontology; Formal ontology; Upper ontology; Closure (psychology); Ontology Inference Layer; Suggested Upper Merged Ontology; Rotation formalisms in three dimensions; Knowledge representation and reasoning; Theoretical computer science; Information retrieval; Epistemology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Semantic Web; Data mining; OWL-S","score_opus":0.08347819137130967,"score_gpt":0.293510902390329,"score_spread":0.21003271101901932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092547615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7970073,0.004883087,0.18912865,0.005025318,0.00032869802,0.00023827942,0.0000026483235,0.000118475546,0.0032675238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99652857,0.000044138036,0.0022123102,0.0011614674,0.000029548473,0.0000017360052,8.92159e-7,0.0000017220693,0.000019648469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916065,0.00009829912,0.00021123461,0.0002720695,0.000080837264,0.00017692629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995472,0.00018176236,0.000043333584,0.00016544288,0.00002454647,0.000037747042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023998726,0.0001049523,0.00020176443,0.00004818854,0.000085593936,0.000075594864,0.00017937688,0.00009859151,0.00002824587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038810475,0.00007909245,0.000029832026,0.00012536162,0.00025990815,0.000306521,0.000041592546,0.00012273387,0.0000049807336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010449455,0.000012525299,0.00029560906,0.0000011515343,0.000018557634,0.000009125907,0.0019170636,0.00003985806,0.00029335293,0.9351823,0.0000053469143,0.062214695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026717275,0.00014235916,0.0055893483,0.0000044854314,0.000038515685,0.00001895112,0.0006272456,0.0025427237,0.0071285726,0.98341584,0.00034320413,0.00012201438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000119211094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012950428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19952121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000056188733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000139310005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32252967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124147503","doi":"10.1007/s10506-019-09249-w","title":"When expert opinion evidence goes wrong","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Computer science; Jury; Epistemology; Argumentation framework; Probabilistic argumentation; Artificial intelligence; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1204116196810357,"score_gpt":0.3305491665304403,"score_spread":0.2101375468494046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124147503","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0686581,0.003062476,0.9163857,0.004021405,0.0033573376,0.0006380419,0.0000013268412,0.0002226469,0.0036529393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963598,0.00029033888,0.0023832158,0.0005872386,0.00017069261,0.000011007934,0.0000010803665,0.0000056524673,0.00019097627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988817,0.000059486127,0.0002718784,0.00037550868,0.00020553544,0.00020591376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992961,0.00013414452,0.0000757945,0.00036674895,0.000054752953,0.00007243819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031433656,0.000110864974,0.00012968825,0.00004187437,0.00012708886,0.0002401641,0.00035806093,0.000059155947,0.00011704265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025689937,0.000094661336,0.000040487004,0.00010954874,0.0000466583,0.0010515066,0.00012139559,0.00007111021,0.000646738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009023499,0.000036641002,0.00062330795,0.000021969174,0.0000074233344,0.0000018527696,0.0039981715,0.00009813009,0.0071577267,0.88136214,0.00039523368,0.10628837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012157058,0.0007397294,0.0021380011,0.0011055097,0.000008005505,0.000037219594,0.00195563,0.42515576,0.29930133,0.12808973,0.1399634,0.0013841157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086799625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011272449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9277017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018208402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017852955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83127236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290738699","doi":"10.1007/s10506-022-09327-6","title":"Thirty years of artificial intelligence and law: the third decade","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Artificial intelligence; Variety (cybernetics); Legal aspects of computing; Philosophy of law; Computer science; Feature (linguistics); Symbolic artificial intelligence; Law; The Internet; Political science; Artificial intelligence, situated approach; Comparative law; World Wide Web; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08892713967190774,"score_gpt":0.35036535362793075,"score_spread":0.261438213956023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290738699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82345575,0.0039504194,0.025101818,0.023707084,0.005194908,0.0036991292,0.00021279964,0.00061773666,0.11406037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968623,0.00040735936,0.00037563444,0.0016163571,0.000403557,0.00007899989,0.000005172448,0.00003163347,0.00021901255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958107,0.0006846428,0.0010360549,0.00068469736,0.0010123354,0.0007715848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997419,0.0012777785,0.0003256998,0.0005303835,0.00019890162,0.00024825067],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030603693,0.0002858772,0.0004132644,0.000118991156,0.00309997,0.0002987279,0.000976895,0.00017790326,0.0009006709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041423633,0.00026812218,0.00015699034,0.0008579988,0.005355694,0.00046151024,0.0005682901,0.00071846094,0.00009753275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073705065,0.00012527498,0.00008209418,0.000008413474,0.000025037874,0.00001291088,0.01975599,0.00050861284,0.0004880784,0.84696335,0.0000995368,0.13185702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011413427,0.00031902254,0.000050281946,0.000028219922,0.00006476152,0.000014256131,0.073768735,0.0021892537,0.027077338,0.81167465,0.08431356,0.0004884973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022666909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028653376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17340654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009517078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017800454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319659350","doi":"10.1007/s10506-023-09346-x","title":"Correction: Using attention methods to predict judicial outcomes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Computer science; Legal aspects of computing; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law; The Internet; Comparative law; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1992209616846759,"score_gpt":0.4873160492234294,"score_spread":0.2880950875387535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319659350","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16519876,0.000040985422,0.8104962,0.004432467,0.004065492,0.0002874026,0.0000036896524,0.0002942659,0.015180731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97847015,0.000022874377,0.018741425,0.000529199,0.0006142633,0.0000113571705,0.000005589134,0.000009179835,0.0015959884],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986407,0.00035629194,0.00026276198,0.00023989161,0.00026361138,0.00023673898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990451,0.0005817831,0.000050792023,0.00008145258,0.00011493621,0.00012595444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017891407,0.000084621024,0.00016137226,0.00014792744,0.00086884975,0.00012871176,0.00010524854,0.000059720227,0.0001673189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042868996,0.00008085361,0.000087867615,0.0010866699,0.00019239182,0.00015797312,0.000056420016,0.0000786519,0.00015281302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014555678,0.00003136743,0.0029711009,0.0000029078,0.00003660146,0.000003689154,0.003911223,0.0026274554,0.0007067805,0.43504277,0.0004073928,0.55424416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045204128,0.00014530485,0.019327298,0.00006594549,0.00017350217,0.0000034467441,0.02069762,0.18293752,0.00424645,0.69063306,0.081073605,0.0006510242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057193046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004609346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81327134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034449644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004764966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8645916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361271390","doi":"10.1007/s10506-023-09353-y","title":"The use of AI in legal systems: determining independent contractor vs. employee status","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Independent contractor; Equity (law); Common law; Labour law; Sample (material); Variety (cybernetics); Business; Legal case; Legal advice; Legal profession; Law; Political science; Actuarial science; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.09575145007591922,"score_gpt":0.32395716149632076,"score_spread":0.22820571142040152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361271390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99249065,0.00006379875,0.0004920989,0.00077997084,0.00043598656,0.0002905077,0.000011251335,0.000045524215,0.0053902273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994607,0.00022834567,0.0000053369145,0.000117966905,0.00004294882,0.000013952555,0.0000029536086,0.0000038422972,0.00012392706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990612,0.00006753439,0.00034656623,0.00010339465,0.00014773518,0.0002735187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938023,0.00038564505,0.00005638804,0.000072865725,0.000046366706,0.000058473994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052800664,0.000058484515,0.00010664324,0.00004733567,0.00029397936,0.00042529646,0.00009256687,0.000054987508,0.000006415135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010149374,0.000047480076,0.00002755018,0.00022716056,0.00029165988,0.00095421396,0.000015672058,0.00009643399,0.0000330303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040150724,0.000015951866,0.0039665313,0.000008268117,0.0000070924048,0.000004755371,0.0062998845,0.0005915555,0.000015428972,0.87626016,0.000046878944,0.11274336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013602579,0.00030052947,0.012276021,0.00027941744,0.00002461983,0.0000023091043,0.05923679,0.011474181,0.0035925652,0.04840038,0.86372095,0.0005562112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00862354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042506095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86367404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024267181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000693697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366823452","doi":"10.1007/s10506-023-09357-8","title":"A Bayesian model of legal syllogistic reasoning","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; CRÉ de Montréal","funders":"Australian Research Council; European Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Syllogism; Philosophy of law; Legal aspects of computing; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Bayesian probability; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; The Internet; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.13164901074696783,"score_gpt":0.3764715078871092,"score_spread":0.24482249714014137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366823452","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25570002,0.00028493753,0.4057881,0.0076123434,0.0016233053,0.001244689,0.000063016836,0.0012321242,0.32645148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99762386,0.00017251394,0.0009851442,0.00018622958,0.00019709337,0.000018466317,0.000004284508,0.000019136018,0.0007932483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798614,0.00012804406,0.0005330861,0.00036141096,0.00043140503,0.0005599073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891007,0.00035746198,0.00012720579,0.00024999137,0.00016831621,0.00018697842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012237581,0.00015456219,0.0002511677,0.00012878537,0.00077087496,0.00013258996,0.0003371326,0.00014872836,0.00017202292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006155161,0.00015956929,0.00009073102,0.00077062956,0.0018928235,0.00043144863,0.000096283395,0.00017673762,0.00022156509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021954651,0.000034063884,0.000120021,0.000010617691,0.000009951953,0.000009158143,0.005228612,0.007592143,0.0010078008,0.96772194,0.00011513998,0.018128604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102119,0.00008430292,0.000009287637,0.00007095147,0.000029437202,0.0000014515592,0.017192682,0.2855651,0.023466656,0.66764987,0.00559955,0.0003205033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00886765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01351813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74192387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038193633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015069722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412173123","doi":"10.1007/s10506-025-09464-8","title":"The compliance gap in data supply chains: contract specification languages and smart contracts as compliance technologies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Blockchain Technology Applications and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Research Foundation","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Business; Supply chain; Computer science; Accounting; Marketing","score_opus":0.09527793556201541,"score_gpt":0.3561852737757609,"score_spread":0.2609073382137455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412173123","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13317735,0.044304162,0.55595565,0.24596474,0.0006349877,0.0028495376,0.00007676542,0.0016677158,0.015369093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99566877,0.0019416562,0.0017090373,0.0005438482,0.0000113747765,0.000052513533,0.0000065770028,0.000003408249,0.000062803316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877393,0.00004120423,0.00031601137,0.0005159742,0.00009088077,0.0002620166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983011,0.00042565423,0.0000869551,0.0010967406,0.000064307234,0.000025266505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005257884,0.00012726057,0.00016601215,0.0000706764,0.00044392626,0.00024826155,0.0012889322,0.00012410113,0.0000020696605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016204534,0.00010245352,0.000013080011,0.00042825696,0.00078473624,0.00026707738,0.0004676344,0.0002768778,0.000019293959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062669997,0.000036138983,0.0002710839,0.0000055758196,0.0000049735318,0.0000032619357,0.00009476691,0.0000015506166,0.00031164306,0.72639996,0.000057278525,0.27280748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008939344,0.00005169261,0.00469834,0.00015665531,0.000008722952,0.00002131001,0.002382264,0.107791364,0.02221973,0.8197564,0.042541157,0.0002829763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005076256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003824532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8624914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015830621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029395263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41779333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}