{"meta":{"query_hash":"dc03d5abaf91","filters":{"venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/dc03d5abaf91","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Artificial+Intelligence+and+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1531887372","doi":"10.1023/a:1013803600690","title":"Douglas Walton, The New Dialectic. Conversational Contexts of Argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press (Book Review)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.03570576855092915,"score_gpt":0.2717127328523034,"score_spread":0.23600696430137424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531887372","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000096905525,0.97730255,0.0012605598,0.006589576,0.0011504147,0.000009658782,0.00009895536,0.000038663286,0.013452738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009822831,0.9516721,0.0019716194,0.0030714325,0.0022852274,0.000056293353,0.00021744259,0.00007011636,0.030832982],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989814,0.000303039,0.00007955941,0.000111087764,0.00041628347,0.00010860211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817073,0.0010159932,0.0001540973,0.00006751693,0.00038873582,0.00020293857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001723914,0.0015029839,0.0016498247,0.0061556315,0.002316241,0.0062384293,0.0022656692,0.0042561186,0.027425172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00360917,0.0019145949,0.0006656849,0.010654014,0.008038433,0.012561676,0.0017773346,0.0043707965,0.009051675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056380435,0.000027282422,0.00029709938,0.0024037194,0.000041469968,0.00018489113,0.0029248127,0.00030932066,0.00018682223,0.118934624,0.7503852,0.12424842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020858952,0.000010102634,0.0009488131,0.0014919468,0.000028430599,0.0003548417,0.00087372167,0.00011362375,0.00013122101,0.060716778,0.9352866,0.000023048144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078860775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1864391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078860775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008411773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072573824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15680349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982329760","doi":"10.1023/b:arti.0000046007.11806.9a","title":"Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and Generalisations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":192,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Defeasible reasoning; Defeasible estate; Underpinning; Epistemology; Probabilistic argumentation; Computer science; Empirical evidence; Deductive reasoning; Model-based reasoning; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Engineering; Knowledge representation and reasoning","score_opus":0.09223170808788776,"score_gpt":0.33048547986861676,"score_spread":0.23825377178072898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982329760","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005290969,0.003072923,0.9645952,0.009281181,0.0001828515,0.00009669925,0.00018421921,0.00019084562,0.017105121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3438911,0.0043219696,0.6417254,0.0016774924,0.0010005996,0.00051614654,0.0006764058,0.00021309235,0.005977737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986127,0.008327654,0.0014604153,0.0013484458,0.0021721725,0.0005642303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97769916,0.0148345865,0.0015727767,0.0034169857,0.0018793289,0.0005971731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018022597,0.0017388196,0.0020176375,0.006147632,0.002874177,0.014515115,0.005599544,0.008527925,0.0062331962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031528827,0.002250122,0.00418888,0.0066320626,0.020756504,0.037811518,0.007339352,0.010419906,0.0010856739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051800425,0.000004895627,0.000039924358,0.000050029634,0.000011710749,0.00002641954,0.00029063007,0.001396059,0.000051305316,0.9955259,0.00035642035,0.0022415284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052365003,0.0000018628665,0.000012850421,0.000022733675,0.0000070128203,0.000020980888,0.00003223416,0.003219468,0.00003779575,0.99461454,0.0020207549,0.0000045109477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024607866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00198137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018022597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039508413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026335458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09531373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039190550","doi":"10.1007/s10506-010-9093-9","title":"Evaluation of information retrieval for E-discovery","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Open Text (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Information retrieval; Data science; Context (archaeology); Precision and recall; Question answering","score_opus":0.07755438895016285,"score_gpt":0.33809230550115454,"score_spread":0.2605379165509917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039190550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89788795,0.011379488,0.044399906,0.0028318076,0.00027301564,0.0011065794,0.001496337,0.0018946887,0.03873021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98300135,0.0005231996,0.013649767,0.00010031264,0.00006401454,0.0001058316,0.00069397455,0.00006069393,0.0018008365],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97561026,0.015638698,0.0014325483,0.00088128564,0.005825684,0.00061155064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80702835,0.16761144,0.0041101347,0.006838935,0.012220891,0.0021902109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030033983,0.0010630059,0.0015505014,0.0054313615,0.001097296,0.0040770923,0.0014647432,0.0023779483,0.0056223795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11943911,0.0002069449,0.00086578424,0.002725965,0.001126582,0.0045747347,0.0012395066,0.00081299234,0.0011814693],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04271667,0.007204709,0.09572834,0.004125441,0.0018288142,0.00037075253,0.0008644294,0.11406494,0.010119083,0.028381635,0.0130247725,0.6815703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018452473,0.012610319,0.04366994,0.0002867541,0.0014220487,0.00045331562,0.0007242751,0.8944385,0.021149142,0.015333524,0.007879605,0.00018718299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060322667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042848275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030033983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035772794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028105448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15883684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046836002","doi":"10.1007/s10506-012-9120-0","title":"A Carneades reconstruction of Popov v Hayashi","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Argument map; Computer science; Legal aspects of computing; Visualization; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; The Internet; World Wide Web; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07958655965729128,"score_gpt":0.2932689512155651,"score_spread":0.21368239155827384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046836002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022817539,0.03287561,0.0592985,0.24264239,0.01706227,0.00016724278,0.00073825463,0.00026027896,0.6241379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.668073,0.017103227,0.02366976,0.040652737,0.007820427,0.00024838492,0.00032341792,0.00044058176,0.2416684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987153,0.00056105584,0.00006586703,0.00029123324,0.00022191762,0.00014472303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985775,0.0005534966,0.00009912732,0.00028463753,0.00036048735,0.00012481776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028030907,0.0008000375,0.0008368056,0.0016558289,0.0049481434,0.0043264604,0.0010761997,0.0039535123,0.009951741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009629013,0.00049186905,0.0005642357,0.0011240119,0.01588435,0.009955303,0.003978856,0.0073918174,0.0022939001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022927858,0.0000075170774,0.00003391537,0.000016914651,0.000005396779,0.00004647842,0.0003697178,0.00018349153,0.000025140918,0.9811214,0.014981444,0.003185658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015642869,0.00000975041,0.000055296707,0.00006724979,0.00000462663,0.000070570466,0.00020446801,0.00045308715,0.00012530184,0.84767073,0.1513078,0.000015582149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008334403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042222687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009951741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004798074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029815913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03481257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061085701","doi":"10.1007/s10506-013-9151-1","title":"Baseballs and arguments from fairness","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Epistemology; Computer science; Scheme (mathematics); Legal aspects of computing; Philosophy of law; Informal logic; Basis (linear algebra); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; The Internet","score_opus":0.04394982316286884,"score_gpt":0.2628262240864747,"score_spread":0.21887640092360588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061085701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04471556,0.0065905293,0.110863894,0.09214943,0.0023104153,0.00010715245,0.0001321034,0.00008168312,0.7430493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95383435,0.0011427648,0.0073231272,0.00628681,0.0013414752,0.00016538496,0.000037765025,0.00007076636,0.029797573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923809,0.0044413577,0.00026284202,0.000910889,0.0011713399,0.0008325914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98237795,0.01346721,0.0009910618,0.0017149034,0.00086967676,0.00057916774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010813883,0.00074313895,0.0014104276,0.0021597287,0.0074691013,0.007924979,0.0027605875,0.011542671,0.016169364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040999215,0.00080078375,0.0010056626,0.0018546077,0.024915148,0.015905429,0.005457103,0.009114925,0.0010897772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010379067,0.0000035892465,0.00002734559,0.000007097341,0.0000027419267,0.00001511403,0.00016285882,0.0001150569,0.0000071706413,0.9981658,0.0007058283,0.0007770186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008606597,0.0000015172317,0.000019720752,0.000010077601,0.0000018851377,0.000007834273,0.000060840663,0.00022402221,0.00001299359,0.9967841,0.0028659478,0.0000023581847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046623913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029347802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016169364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004176237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020176165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05718994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071805340","doi":"10.1007/s10506-006-9014-0","title":"Persuasion Dialogue in Online Dispute Resolution","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Negotiation; Argumentation theory; Online dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Dispute resolution; Legal aspects of computing; Computer science; Conflict resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Epistemology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; The Internet; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07303214965820533,"score_gpt":0.30446472382580814,"score_spread":0.23143257416760282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071805340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5333297,0.0029031632,0.3097218,0.008089785,0.0007838036,0.00028435388,0.0001248401,0.0006539556,0.1441086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772156,0.00016339296,0.016688611,0.00013784008,0.00007906429,0.00008367818,0.00004092018,0.00004573281,0.005545055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905844,0.007612607,0.00025876335,0.00040706235,0.0007809699,0.0003562904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94632405,0.049515378,0.00096008525,0.0012727715,0.0011952032,0.0007324807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009198181,0.00046093224,0.0007823626,0.0009100006,0.0029519575,0.0050955713,0.0016727868,0.00452249,0.014542396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05614569,0.00066013343,0.00040187562,0.0010403289,0.0024611135,0.011033731,0.0035547598,0.0032323278,0.0012171199],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037716895,0.0016607117,0.0059107244,0.0007061929,0.00011446121,0.002354228,0.025592187,0.043737188,0.00482093,0.7316644,0.0111359265,0.16853145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043432374,0.00029517707,0.0017171147,0.00014416093,0.0000801176,0.0007618349,0.0059448867,0.35494855,0.003083993,0.6140874,0.018437129,0.00006534507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016511871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010018804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014542396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011352045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013399011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04864919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080571997","doi":"10.1007/s10506-012-9132-9","title":"The epistemology of scientific evidence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Scientific evidence; Argument (complex analysis); Credibility; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Empirical evidence; Component (thermodynamics); Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.19274562134031445,"score_gpt":0.4056515266181242,"score_spread":0.21290590527780975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080571997","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019882957,0.041813854,0.45129424,0.24250826,0.0042901533,0.00027939052,0.0007913407,0.00023283364,0.2389069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8320042,0.01175064,0.12558925,0.015517869,0.00706932,0.00090027123,0.00040777566,0.00015434233,0.0066063255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.925306,0.054944437,0.004601293,0.0052179988,0.00881138,0.0011188639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71480364,0.24773102,0.008223416,0.016437393,0.010389326,0.0024153132],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06404029,0.0011933577,0.0029921175,0.013192259,0.0058855447,0.018881794,0.0047742706,0.012941075,0.0053767664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1518396,0.0020255896,0.0021020393,0.0058319573,0.085083716,0.036401242,0.0068430193,0.013267332,0.0009300754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065549366,0.0000070264205,0.00015596343,0.0000919485,0.000021040107,0.000030972413,0.0003648636,0.00014403817,0.0000197834,0.9968238,0.0007238527,0.001610193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012013063,0.0000031017928,0.0000485035,0.00011249227,0.0000095214855,0.00003344554,0.0001304907,0.00037056927,0.000036313137,0.9953518,0.003885935,0.0000057733105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025080352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016564636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99411446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007811109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0088818595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33868146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092547615","doi":"10.1007/s10506-009-9082-z","title":"Meta-relation and ontology closure in Conceptual Structure Theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Relation (database); Computer science; Process ontology; Formal ontology; Upper ontology; Closure (psychology); Ontology Inference Layer; Suggested Upper Merged Ontology; Rotation formalisms in three dimensions; Knowledge representation and reasoning; Theoretical computer science; Information retrieval; Epistemology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Semantic Web; Data mining; OWL-S","score_opus":0.08347819137130967,"score_gpt":0.293510902390329,"score_spread":0.21003271101901932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092547615","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051748298,0.0056627137,0.86384064,0.011344936,0.0010074885,0.00013733002,0.0004138158,0.0002926741,0.0655522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.812504,0.0024998423,0.17305267,0.001170736,0.0013817315,0.000400027,0.00067578023,0.00025185192,0.008063331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939323,0.002627439,0.00066079793,0.0011238226,0.0012375023,0.00041817696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978738,0.014959957,0.0009703394,0.00331215,0.0014487967,0.00057073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01096833,0.0006733853,0.002088815,0.0040497985,0.0053169844,0.0067167445,0.0033738664,0.0038677282,0.0067427605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028439539,0.001417169,0.0033802683,0.004062205,0.015087041,0.03715789,0.0058323834,0.008458583,0.00071452424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010279395,0.000009319682,0.0000621805,0.000020301695,0.0000051129573,0.000023337576,0.00024212396,0.0002542105,0.000039315197,0.99737096,0.00033658018,0.0016264452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004810491,0.0000023181979,0.000019357905,0.000007737769,0.0000051365246,0.000017774417,0.000039850664,0.0009324234,0.000041386593,0.9979704,0.0009554833,0.0000033702538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036856616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015369919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01096833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034988653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021413604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058006763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124147503","doi":"10.1007/s10506-019-09249-w","title":"When expert opinion evidence goes wrong","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Computer science; Jury; Epistemology; Argumentation framework; Probabilistic argumentation; Artificial intelligence; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1204116196810357,"score_gpt":0.3305491665304403,"score_spread":0.2101375468494046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124147503","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11435495,0.010477361,0.031135648,0.5942352,0.012929233,0.00023796425,0.0022625003,0.00037868886,0.23398851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8891933,0.0036223005,0.013451486,0.07532117,0.0057991855,0.00014443218,0.0011850335,0.0001240093,0.011159141],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9671942,0.012191763,0.0036815514,0.003637845,0.010377773,0.0029168024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68059754,0.23831333,0.022145085,0.016574904,0.037103727,0.005265342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043108106,0.000566232,0.0016590806,0.0056526405,0.0023604892,0.009666372,0.0032916886,0.019844787,0.018274447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3184969,0.00073296914,0.001097561,0.0025802918,0.0051776464,0.016189598,0.0032879221,0.008841302,0.0038286918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002721117,0.0005857667,0.07454158,0.0020949694,0.0015430483,0.012762848,0.0055400943,0.0019421704,0.0013950466,0.26906425,0.3600923,0.26771688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052608113,0.00023039048,0.019988123,0.00303877,0.000704642,0.0034911444,0.0071651055,0.011050673,0.0036914668,0.8253329,0.12460141,0.00017930836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031357806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004412017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043108106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026660883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004680554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2279802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290738699","doi":"10.1007/s10506-022-09327-6","title":"Thirty years of artificial intelligence and law: the third decade","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Artificial intelligence; Variety (cybernetics); Legal aspects of computing; Philosophy of law; Computer science; Feature (linguistics); Symbolic artificial intelligence; Law; The Internet; Political science; Artificial intelligence, situated approach; Comparative law; World Wide Web; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08892713967190774,"score_gpt":0.35036535362793075,"score_spread":0.261438213956023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290738699","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048925322,0.6729399,0.0006866765,0.23643206,0.017509144,0.000014523728,0.00017184397,0.000028604001,0.06732473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21129262,0.61578166,0.0013043568,0.09314649,0.028907994,0.00010099495,0.00026369776,0.00011684923,0.049085304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99503773,0.0016608143,0.00040213982,0.0004233485,0.0019322484,0.0005437217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98169255,0.0097234,0.0018349254,0.0010944841,0.0035399753,0.002114596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008771435,0.00046566737,0.0007991068,0.005068862,0.0038498936,0.015462347,0.00095614727,0.0045926864,0.009958932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018856984,0.00040567276,0.000442566,0.0061996994,0.010936245,0.011201298,0.004574372,0.0073957196,0.0016885165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053180087,0.00006246075,0.00085839856,0.0005083598,0.000015604484,0.00015983259,0.003498744,0.00020390369,0.00015661758,0.76502407,0.17660654,0.052852277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006572647,0.000014537857,0.00068029534,0.0008935182,0.000003669088,0.00007448456,0.001231959,0.00007360619,0.00004407874,0.044532016,0.9524343,0.000010872259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077098575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067366157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015462347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011117808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011491578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08066565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319659350","doi":"10.1007/s10506-023-09346-x","title":"Correction: Using attention methods to predict judicial outcomes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Computer science; Legal aspects of computing; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law; The Internet; Comparative law; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1992209616846759,"score_gpt":0.4873160492234294,"score_spread":0.2880950875387535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319659350","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005753418,0.0006047359,0.002073019,0.07278328,0.9099664,0.00008122171,0.007967589,0.0013226471,0.0046258285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09965623,0.005333192,0.020921204,0.12127885,0.44298473,0.0013546871,0.013699406,0.0044670925,0.29030463],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99003905,0.0017001979,0.002284575,0.0017184931,0.0033794534,0.000878247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84309644,0.04705379,0.006381075,0.0168,0.082863964,0.0038047326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075987936,0.003160006,0.0036532988,0.007143696,0.0057785558,0.0061372104,0.0072654216,0.012854117,0.12604132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24025117,0.0023587977,0.0019793494,0.007834833,0.0042633107,0.0046415003,0.0033795938,0.014432502,0.06343964],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004894709,0.000007228253,0.0002244605,0.00022955127,0.000052630035,0.00023769423,0.0000863804,0.00009589255,0.000048191458,0.00154249,0.991655,0.0057715126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035072706,0.000053808057,0.006166154,0.0012218998,0.0002856053,0.0012281779,0.00044696635,0.0031493455,0.0012592078,0.015201132,0.97039527,0.00024179369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02299007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030928481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12604132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004660922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008362194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42165023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361271390","doi":"10.1007/s10506-023-09353-y","title":"The use of AI in legal systems: determining independent contractor vs. employee status","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Independent contractor; Equity (law); Common law; Labour law; Sample (material); Variety (cybernetics); Business; Legal case; Legal advice; Legal profession; Law; Political science; Actuarial science; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.09575145007591922,"score_gpt":0.32395716149632076,"score_spread":0.22820571142040152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361271390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9260371,0.0005575888,0.011028531,0.0028974416,0.000063294145,0.000103684906,0.00024617073,0.00003558022,0.05903069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765235,0.000052614003,0.0016324539,0.000062827414,0.000015494383,0.000015215389,0.00003837176,0.0000063462267,0.0005243313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989038,0.0058362307,0.00076598465,0.00073016324,0.0028650272,0.00076457066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7354933,0.23160481,0.010182216,0.0042791427,0.014300269,0.004140252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02102312,0.00026961253,0.00034298497,0.0065782387,0.0022093472,0.005820244,0.0013177852,0.0010197558,0.004235061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15625183,0.00021218539,0.00037524913,0.003016819,0.004037744,0.0054503162,0.0015507318,0.0015867619,0.00058610865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009655196,0.0005263452,0.8317107,0.00017165158,0.00014882404,0.0003099923,0.007908397,0.0034893262,0.0014246311,0.05704571,0.0018724129,0.09442657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012719171,0.00084935175,0.5932523,0.0005695441,0.0005166304,0.0009052899,0.025722774,0.20653689,0.010273929,0.14878933,0.012305922,0.00015079977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017023616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01959301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02102312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022540917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033781615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11118221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366823452","doi":"10.1007/s10506-023-09357-8","title":"A Bayesian model of legal syllogistic reasoning","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; CRÉ de Montréal","funders":"Australian Research Council; European Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Syllogism; Philosophy of law; Legal aspects of computing; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Bayesian probability; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; The Internet; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.13164901074696783,"score_gpt":0.3764715078871092,"score_spread":0.24482249714014137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366823452","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015594401,0.00060022064,0.93102235,0.0070316833,0.0000817881,0.00016161877,0.000867552,0.00032692286,0.044313498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5666432,0.001899592,0.40399772,0.0012916061,0.00038729564,0.0006015589,0.0012284424,0.00012882373,0.023821725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99561775,0.0016839241,0.0002335939,0.0008253393,0.0013174484,0.00032197245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990516,0.0066328915,0.0007087219,0.0005337338,0.0011882755,0.0004204109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050043734,0.0006356957,0.0011267075,0.0028526196,0.0016785244,0.0047850693,0.0031042546,0.0032344363,0.008331097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01876858,0.0010014408,0.0015482369,0.0023916787,0.004063783,0.009157899,0.0019094078,0.0035065117,0.0014238601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020884441,0.000028712766,0.0003424352,0.00003538301,0.000019577325,0.000091757116,0.00027859706,0.03533855,0.00013432893,0.9545492,0.0013920537,0.0077686193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024805513,0.0000069939742,0.00014070231,0.000022456039,0.000015792686,0.0000636106,0.000040576015,0.15518041,0.00006792975,0.84104425,0.0033738522,0.000018671723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02211547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018050749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02211547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044983416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004167311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043973505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412173123","doi":"10.1007/s10506-025-09464-8","title":"The compliance gap in data supply chains: contract specification languages and smart contracts as compliance technologies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","topic":"Blockchain Technology Applications and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Research Foundation","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Business; Supply chain; Computer science; Accounting; Marketing","score_opus":0.09527793556201541,"score_gpt":0.3561852737757609,"score_spread":0.2609073382137455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412173123","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042996734,0.0026940093,0.8958289,0.022692623,0.00029037503,0.00008475722,0.0001745316,0.00046949036,0.034768626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82692194,0.0019653528,0.16058245,0.0022267266,0.0003949766,0.0002896393,0.00029416961,0.00024054,0.007084233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871832,0.007816365,0.00095155503,0.0012557054,0.0020598094,0.00073333614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9581035,0.030292466,0.0025233068,0.005623173,0.0025808122,0.0008767349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015551091,0.0006350372,0.0011877669,0.0022121514,0.0023502032,0.0112444125,0.0021481437,0.005580806,0.0060353265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031397056,0.0010754952,0.0012782923,0.0043175877,0.014236833,0.043000564,0.0061003054,0.0077407924,0.00068631466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018217275,0.000015038292,0.000068124835,0.000025256146,0.000002810703,0.000023121858,0.00036601105,0.0012231556,0.00008902135,0.9945628,0.00034475626,0.0032616283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014727389,0.000010311638,0.000026179127,0.000048655176,0.0000056911526,0.000028870569,0.0001873124,0.015145084,0.0002960643,0.98096085,0.0032653534,0.000011013969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025635506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011892114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015551091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002934098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004427457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082243025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}