{"meta":{"query_hash":"295198cbd0d0","filters":{"venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law"},"cohort_total":10,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"exported":10,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/295198cbd0d0","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Asian+Journal+of+Comparative+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1989537364","doi":"10.1017/s2194607800000016","title":"Buddhism, Human Rights and Constitutional Reform in Thailand","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Buddhism; Legitimacy; Human rights; State (computer science); Political science; Constitution; State religion; Law; Context (archaeology); Faith; Commission; Sociology; Philosophy; Geography; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.04420204786155569,"score_gpt":0.3730741826063977,"score_spread":0.328872134744842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989537364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37246767,0.014801161,0.0043511433,0.038026687,0.00014900597,0.00007087148,0.00006734704,0.00003471145,0.5700314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99435896,0.0009993884,0.00023996075,0.00036984883,0.000025227597,0.000012452875,0.0000060243733,0.0000024176136,0.003985713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975744,0.0017630033,0.000056878995,0.000092021335,0.00022301736,0.00029081176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780315,0.0013972749,0.00030452627,0.0001281148,0.00016905206,0.00019793236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002439284,0.000092054004,0.0001720007,0.00065520784,0.002716848,0.0057327384,0.00032773704,0.0010155699,0.0038565085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002768046,0.00008541147,0.00010368678,0.0015268356,0.019761074,0.0021572371,0.0032367462,0.0021505428,0.00012077441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012906658,0.000013140312,0.00063399156,0.00006682608,0.0000031990855,0.00026832492,0.010314589,0.00082753645,0.00011751439,0.9801838,0.0007398659,0.0068183336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005933133,0.00012635376,0.007814085,0.0006843123,0.000019418065,0.00042506307,0.041636728,0.0023980853,0.0012438725,0.6846159,0.2609322,0.00004466451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010491125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01061725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010491125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056993426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055806898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041351795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125265707","doi":"10.1017/s2194607800000417","title":"377 and the Unnatural Afterlife of British Colonialism in Asia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Charter; Afterlife; Declaration; Human rights; Law; Political science; Alien; History; Ancient history; Ethnology; Art; Literature; Politics","score_opus":0.0328866215319174,"score_gpt":0.3418315737564559,"score_spread":0.3089449522245385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125265707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7321562,0.010063327,0.00013870845,0.032336112,0.0004019024,0.000014163015,0.0000781621,0.0000151724125,0.22479616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97911835,0.0025307238,0.000044642224,0.0018194783,0.00005621889,0.0000050640015,0.000014490086,0.000014478095,0.016396426],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874425,0.00037761536,0.000046301073,0.00009497093,0.00018163702,0.0005551275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986241,0.00036038458,0.0002575282,0.000085517815,0.00031799247,0.00035454094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011916335,0.00016719011,0.00021708527,0.0008228175,0.01119243,0.0046986956,0.00035295627,0.0011194198,0.005032251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019972401,0.00019290319,0.0000810656,0.0017021518,0.010570833,0.0016511565,0.003324192,0.0026817124,0.0005284124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080973805,0.000031937663,0.010768657,0.00009243814,0.000011116229,0.002544819,0.83647853,0.00003441758,0.00074973603,0.11002501,0.014906068,0.024276428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000832101,0.000042241616,0.030094119,0.00029376242,0.000010663275,0.00096582685,0.32128716,0.00005965391,0.00026569536,0.004347715,0.64258754,0.00003725798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39459237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5467229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39459237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012443217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005818793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7845912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792885287","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2017.25","title":"Fundamental Human Rights and ‘Traditional Japanese Values’: Constitutional Amendment and Vision of the Japanese Society","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Japanese History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law; Cabinet (room); Human rights; Fundamental rights; State (computer science); Engineering","score_opus":0.04170485564919228,"score_gpt":0.3357997853767732,"score_spread":0.2940949297275809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792885287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21330018,0.005503176,0.008876683,0.058424387,0.00073508744,0.000060276157,0.000036066238,0.000030342073,0.7130338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99056256,0.00043794236,0.0008576025,0.0017345165,0.00009974701,0.000018425442,0.0000052007135,0.0000039497277,0.006279969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951624,0.002744387,0.0001631788,0.000385343,0.0007952427,0.00074955344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719113,0.0011649586,0.00035757505,0.00031285215,0.00059859426,0.00037486767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008719475,0.00023009302,0.0002676305,0.0011148655,0.00519221,0.0062243883,0.00059008354,0.003421972,0.0021394854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005115566,0.00018783091,0.00022498926,0.0009536631,0.041011102,0.0037751712,0.0031562827,0.0038302613,0.00015769798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048350244,0.000005723331,0.00018685461,0.000015394335,0.0000018235212,0.000048595735,0.006590704,0.000076370205,0.000114052564,0.9907482,0.00063432154,0.0015732283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029849569,0.00006327222,0.0037193678,0.00021339698,0.000031409847,0.00012134446,0.017310161,0.000981665,0.0004756239,0.83507407,0.14193033,0.00004951775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01648393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023264587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01648393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060131815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060308864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04611355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123610114","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2020.15","title":"Replicating Silicon Valley? Law and Human Capital in the Making of China's Tech Startups","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Private Equity and Venture Capital","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"China; Silicon valley; Replication (statistics); High tech; Business; Market economy; Norm (philosophy); Politics; Political science; Economic system; Political economy; Law; Economics; Entrepreneurship","score_opus":0.04083881164053958,"score_gpt":0.28821889814797164,"score_spread":0.24738008650743204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123610114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8655363,0.00051777804,0.007164968,0.01278126,0.000070059024,0.000104494924,0.000043515745,0.00004543481,0.113736175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739623,0.000036499532,0.00029059712,0.00018698466,0.0000075623557,0.00001090482,0.0000040515215,0.0000026637053,0.002064402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971775,0.0010469746,0.00008858411,0.00038169557,0.0005447413,0.000760444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950499,0.0021119895,0.0005896557,0.0010995562,0.0005897513,0.00055914617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007577166,0.00012246572,0.00024944887,0.0012526517,0.0064531206,0.0062889154,0.0010729106,0.001689174,0.0031364097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008410296,0.00018589525,0.0003040214,0.00093138707,0.024272975,0.0038574536,0.0038474584,0.0019078662,0.00015009409],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003144388,0.000021715749,0.013042118,0.000023489281,0.000011928494,0.0008533777,0.021396395,0.001037871,0.00059030345,0.9469054,0.0015990062,0.014487035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007502945,0.00021980972,0.057767052,0.0003803292,0.000054929063,0.00046640166,0.047031313,0.012491476,0.0040549748,0.761762,0.11554071,0.00015590084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018848538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024779623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018848538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006208764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009879925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04504794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211010767","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2021.28","title":"Constitutional Design of Electoral Governance in Federal States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Unitary state; Public administration; Political science; Corporate governance; Dilemma; Federalism; State (computer science); Separation of powers; Politics; Political economy; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.06165131828603472,"score_gpt":0.33879412093905,"score_spread":0.2771428026530153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211010767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26868296,0.0012462349,0.14428003,0.0071876943,0.00025960617,0.00027995344,0.00029338195,0.00034049136,0.5774297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98632103,0.00010189293,0.0055695837,0.00017894572,0.000049424027,0.00010548952,0.00004667437,0.000019897785,0.0076070684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914806,0.004696442,0.00055823324,0.0011548778,0.0008553574,0.0012545105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99593335,0.0017464451,0.00038653918,0.001014524,0.00058474153,0.00033445912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078056934,0.000152001,0.00038851658,0.0013333433,0.005373519,0.007781674,0.0007767536,0.0015579439,0.0069753164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008301422,0.00041322884,0.0004954084,0.0013333033,0.011848676,0.0035142077,0.0028821484,0.0019233713,0.00043566458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030829872,0.0000032354321,0.00011895727,0.000003824824,0.0000016623017,0.000008619908,0.00021410368,0.0003353522,0.000054950207,0.9982772,0.00017513207,0.0008040172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027546595,0.000026026675,0.0010639669,0.0000443461,0.0000146471975,0.00003501534,0.00066084095,0.0031702446,0.00049245585,0.9671395,0.027306912,0.000018479172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062504997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0079821665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078056934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006050661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003905291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043900847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215040550","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2021.36","title":"Constituting and Regulating Democracy: Kenya's Electoral Commission and the Courts in the 2010s","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Democracy; Remand (court procedure); Commission; Judicial deference; Politics","score_opus":0.038085011693558886,"score_gpt":0.33236658046286177,"score_spread":0.2942815687693029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215040550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36049968,0.012276395,0.00085733295,0.071889766,0.0008374481,0.00026987164,0.00023041533,0.00002564767,0.55311346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9527952,0.0013475504,0.00039182906,0.0067962403,0.0001298722,0.00007322861,0.000032552536,0.000014365381,0.038419254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925519,0.0020469439,0.0004293603,0.00067190547,0.0012395324,0.0030603157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905077,0.0052582812,0.0012756602,0.00035747528,0.0016012271,0.0009995094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008906037,0.00029282933,0.00045597827,0.0021100785,0.029244198,0.015449156,0.001386516,0.013166342,0.0055698934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014671338,0.0007974432,0.0003420907,0.002133788,0.013550258,0.0053054723,0.0043435306,0.008979528,0.00038327536],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063206804,0.00005565541,0.0053016543,0.0001306412,0.000016492222,0.0017134943,0.02675507,0.0003004703,0.00055936666,0.9414322,0.015033312,0.008638419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015927538,0.00015221663,0.048658587,0.0020868392,0.00012578325,0.00064156466,0.065623395,0.0011383925,0.0029557166,0.081440695,0.79662436,0.00039320072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30375066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5819109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30375066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039899167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030432599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6039653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280546607","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2022.9","title":"Constitutional Statecraft in Malaysian Courts: A Naive ‘Schmittian’ Misappropriation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Misappropriation; Law; Principle of legality; Democracy; Political science; Politics; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Liberal democracy; Legitimacy; Separation of powers; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03623722061282693,"score_gpt":0.34023841251947246,"score_spread":0.30400119190664554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280546607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38379553,0.0021131681,0.05898487,0.033815525,0.0004249273,0.00011807494,0.00008902527,0.00013144917,0.5205274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859278,0.00019699051,0.0015257049,0.000650149,0.000029782985,0.000023211807,0.0000055988066,0.000007730981,0.01163301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963237,0.0019496772,0.00017036189,0.00047649074,0.00070894853,0.00037086743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697304,0.0013898448,0.00042026633,0.00071164494,0.00039862297,0.00010654237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041223317,0.00021853732,0.00019251529,0.0009302784,0.0029784602,0.0061818804,0.00090348336,0.0025717523,0.0033897592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007676401,0.00030538213,0.00020912124,0.0007813772,0.02327143,0.006275847,0.0034663116,0.003329161,0.00034344257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000393754,0.0000030683905,0.00023483421,0.0000056893077,0.0000012468155,0.00005972556,0.0016228335,0.00010322979,0.00005101626,0.9953413,0.00040746643,0.0021656845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015687077,0.000051460876,0.0010317747,0.0001801132,0.00001036993,0.00030538903,0.003970198,0.002283052,0.0015571773,0.9268323,0.06373301,0.000029411198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042459075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056075845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061818804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052214926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002713198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037884712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317812162","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2022.30","title":"China's New Global Health Governance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"China; Global governance; Corporate governance; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Global health; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Pandemic; Business; Greenhouse gas; International trade; Economic growth; Development economics; Health care; Economics; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.04822449561712825,"score_gpt":0.41489256192985235,"score_spread":0.3666680663127241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317812162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28345397,0.010802246,0.015483399,0.24060144,0.0024484259,0.00041800074,0.00058920967,0.00045159497,0.44575167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9259454,0.0018796673,0.0029280758,0.017575776,0.00050209305,0.0001647961,0.00021990453,0.000030353292,0.050753914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808794,0.00045022723,0.00008287469,0.00031100496,0.0004903488,0.0005775924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855036,0.00024172418,0.0001629141,0.0002662742,0.00030218982,0.00047640936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040492327,0.00030141877,0.00023187028,0.00090241135,0.003651614,0.005223155,0.0006327601,0.002214701,0.0046575693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026232742,0.00020229351,0.00040630673,0.001350158,0.008212815,0.002788148,0.0041320133,0.0029667926,0.00017342603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024795472,0.00002240033,0.009241675,0.000100323545,0.000024596013,0.00037440422,0.008628247,0.0013034645,0.0007982214,0.9109597,0.032584116,0.035938073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048489866,0.000104754596,0.026084263,0.00019310843,0.000038810027,0.00015987341,0.0032228078,0.003171191,0.0006250493,0.1366119,0.8296641,0.00007566736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053765222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046640657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053765222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012000552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026791517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10690457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361296415","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2023.9","title":"Falsehoods, Foreign Interference, and Compelled Speech in Singapore","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Statute; Doctrine; Political science; Misinformation; Law; Government (linguistics); Constitutional right; Free speech; State (computer science); Sociology; Supreme court; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03184545017738778,"score_gpt":0.28088326953833104,"score_spread":0.24903781936094327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361296415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68950915,0.0023003248,0.014520274,0.022478707,0.00028777585,0.00007546029,0.00013111025,0.000061382605,0.2706358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99502325,0.0002201305,0.0005066648,0.00077808194,0.000020615007,0.000010372422,0.000012491189,0.000005651308,0.0034226584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913856,0.0037211431,0.0009754761,0.000783776,0.0024881808,0.0006458427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97283417,0.016902508,0.0042732605,0.0021033613,0.0032275897,0.000659053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010918964,0.00022817358,0.00037807465,0.0014769047,0.0049135475,0.009549959,0.0009967254,0.0041969055,0.0031801776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016884232,0.00039346097,0.00032883498,0.0010662128,0.025827896,0.0040093353,0.004635171,0.004555134,0.0003863213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031203304,0.000026716873,0.009955534,0.0001277325,0.00001582391,0.0021326365,0.098363854,0.00039982513,0.0010429231,0.87358254,0.0022286666,0.012092444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060807604,0.00036007992,0.05605921,0.0023739636,0.00020485514,0.0060908045,0.15224975,0.011963417,0.013435984,0.4327028,0.3240098,0.000488447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03076831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034067564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03076831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065508736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049704453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061178446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390614834","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2023.35","title":"An Islamic Vision of Intellectual Property: Theory and Practice by Ezieddin Elmahjub. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. 214 pp. Hardback: £106.00.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Intellectual property; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Theology; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.022592859611441602,"score_gpt":0.31070344655778803,"score_spread":0.28811058694634645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390614834","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016157556,0.8399929,0.0020586224,0.06355271,0.0035746277,0.000019020523,0.00009364872,0.00004828643,0.08904443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17841448,0.68363094,0.00417216,0.0076988125,0.005492138,0.000081195016,0.00019061686,0.00010695034,0.12021263],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927217,0.00029886854,0.00004828607,0.000082696686,0.00023028001,0.00006775736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999268,0.00040978318,0.0000922884,0.00004367593,0.00010619716,0.00008008312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017796134,0.0008295829,0.0005849434,0.001684638,0.001847047,0.0045850957,0.0009551143,0.0022275236,0.01092782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020081238,0.00044574458,0.00033451928,0.0023264682,0.0075348862,0.006928211,0.0019051923,0.0037333588,0.0029696333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004917003,0.000040602143,0.00032517064,0.00058454793,0.000015868654,0.00019182314,0.0052178153,0.00038515648,0.00012608287,0.41543603,0.41604623,0.16158149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011786092,0.000020705365,0.0014780837,0.0020895195,0.000006706955,0.0003852895,0.003165223,0.00032988825,0.00011550222,0.21161632,0.78076,0.00002092703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051735174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006278387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01092782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003476086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024127502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036557198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}