{"meta":{"query_hash":"9609d8fc4acc","filters":{"venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/9609d8fc4acc","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Asian+Journal+of+Law+and+Society"},"results":[{"id":"W2118390776","doi":"10.1017/als.2013.9","title":"The Trial of Li Zhuang: Chinese Lawyers’ Collective Action against Populism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Wisconsin-Madison; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete; American Bar Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Populism; Ideology; Legitimacy; Political science; Politics; Solidarity; Law; Accountability; Collective action; Autonomy; China; Legalism (Western philosophy); Mobilization; Public administration","score_opus":0.024852095963881472,"score_gpt":0.3081719559403569,"score_spread":0.2833198599764754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118390776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5830179,0.0006069331,0.00022188215,0.013401747,0.0016268021,0.00020871848,0.0000040040823,0.000010173832,0.40090185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978533,0.00072996295,0.000052689527,0.0002922122,0.0008904279,0.0000012085271,1.6113988e-7,0.0000020249415,0.00017805486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921435,0.0001425376,0.00020066345,0.000052074767,0.0002766067,0.00011375472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934554,0.0001610631,0.00021956944,0.00003442532,0.00017866341,0.00006074803],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009525044,0.000055557786,0.00015961257,0.0000073226597,0.0016005886,0.00003866018,0.000095813404,0.000055186007,0.0000030170252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017499666,0.0000337349,0.00018782535,0.00011080384,0.0007937631,0.00012328349,0.000016900796,0.00013031051,5.114007e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013646947,0.00012801014,0.0016122975,0.000006893857,0.00036795708,0.0000018785616,0.08269645,0.0000046839414,0.000120522265,0.8945625,0.0036723276,0.015461813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021322558,0.0012585546,0.025767162,0.00011796061,0.0001872051,0.000012533565,0.14170673,0.000028675206,0.00006497252,0.36655906,0.44261152,0.00036306237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029589882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008957769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5280034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047682654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001710779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2484709572","doi":"10.1017/als.2016.44","title":"Mapping the Ecology of China’s Corporate Legal Sector: Globalization and Its Impact on Lawyers and Society","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; China; Emerging markets; Politics; Political science; Economy; Economic system; Political economy; Business; Law; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.041003776972666495,"score_gpt":0.3384627227278139,"score_spread":0.2974589457551474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2484709572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9036348,0.00016797066,0.00015289144,0.06827984,0.000288339,0.00008614199,0.000013051219,0.0000062562817,0.027370736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976467,0.0006467124,0.00013744674,0.0011390967,0.00015830931,5.570548e-7,5.0279135e-7,0.0000035486307,0.00026711318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930006,0.00015354871,0.00020314845,0.00007228795,0.00015388799,0.00011708836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991109,0.00014462514,0.0004423406,0.000043391003,0.00017918022,0.00007958938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010840311,0.00006475434,0.0001216884,0.0000124200305,0.0004853315,0.000090474095,0.00006770821,0.000077423785,0.000047774713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010254378,0.000035946374,0.000083025145,0.00014637812,0.00035635201,0.00056018506,0.000013464505,0.00015802219,4.6455412e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030496183,0.00007458612,0.011109835,0.000024027062,0.00024320673,0.0000013190866,0.15061854,0.0000036430563,0.0010801874,0.8223588,0.010412326,0.0040430697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025124985,0.000727771,0.6356308,0.0002080854,0.00014497887,0.00014828004,0.11837518,0.00011360551,0.00024773434,0.019013865,0.22248408,0.00039312706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019313571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008867321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8033449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005641382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032440716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37328267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775636802","doi":"10.1017/als.2017.28","title":"Legal Consciousness of the Leftover Woman: Law and Qing in Chinese Family Relations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Legal consciousness; Principle of legality; Consciousness; Law; Feeling; Opposition (politics); Legal realism; Political science; Sociology; Comparative law; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.01998852452864801,"score_gpt":0.296026335165586,"score_spread":0.276037810636938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775636802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80964583,0.0003545027,0.0000106863,0.0034954785,0.00018273407,0.0000353487,0.000003490056,0.0000021530798,0.18626978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991263,0.00017971171,0.00013089401,0.0002933897,0.00007111227,3.2664425e-7,8.1883854e-8,0.0000024735698,0.00019571987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934834,0.00008433559,0.00018970882,0.00007044709,0.00019317077,0.000113998605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948555,0.000049187183,0.00024985056,0.00009957133,0.00005430961,0.00006150378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065062445,0.000057767083,0.0001500607,0.000012035791,0.0010164063,0.00014250298,0.00020642845,0.00006712381,0.000007013527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032109547,0.00003649043,0.00011295507,0.000056364992,0.0011300462,0.00041299066,0.000045040117,0.00018715336,9.791743e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067200217,0.000034337594,0.3907315,0.000010837299,0.000060833212,0.0000042129604,0.08468909,0.0000016558718,0.000049396163,0.52227676,0.0002889122,0.0018457661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051863026,0.000026200714,0.94024014,0.000066357716,0.000021851878,0.000008633441,0.02461056,0.000007200351,0.000003475258,0.024699597,0.009724827,0.00007251325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017709966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012043412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54950863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008185806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7817479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900519741","doi":"10.1017/als.2018.35","title":"The Political Origins of Professional Identity: Lawyers, Judges, and Prosecutors in Taiwan’s State Transformation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Identity (music); State (computer science); Politics; Legal profession; Authoritarianism; Political science; Power (physics); Democratization; Economic Justice; Sociology; Independence (probability theory); Democracy","score_opus":0.0159454842176147,"score_gpt":0.31418128497809733,"score_spread":0.2982358007604826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900519741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9379949,0.00054874626,0.00019318052,0.029911542,0.00039358635,0.0001461351,0.000011182994,0.00000454401,0.030796178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99918187,0.00026453807,0.000092740214,0.00027750706,0.00016280639,8.5532685e-7,1.9246889e-7,0.000001307626,0.000018175902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925935,0.0000703133,0.00021121124,0.000042378535,0.00026462847,0.00015211369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996433,0.000041877294,0.00008611916,0.000019561745,0.00014072437,0.00006838098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069280044,0.000041426396,0.00010303154,0.000009747932,0.00067847985,0.00003639648,0.00006536821,0.00003598843,0.0000045317174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036626083,0.000026533522,0.00004950044,0.000073895724,0.001663917,0.00033386174,0.000014731021,0.000108774126,3.3398797e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012600169,0.00001773364,0.005803832,0.000005104918,0.00002151835,7.407686e-7,0.039582286,3.1492664e-8,0.0000133874,0.95368063,0.00007097468,0.000791135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006701949,0.00019460668,0.055926677,0.00013997177,0.000034312972,0.000012623087,0.20827669,0.0000052148375,0.00008501959,0.6695914,0.064949654,0.00011363599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082478573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035443553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28408924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007117284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019932614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61307716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945129323","doi":"10.1017/als.2018.40","title":"Ordering Power under the Party: A Relational Approach to Law and Politics in China","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Scholarship; Power (physics); Corporate governance; Law; Legal profession; Legal realism; China; Order (exchange); Empirical legal studies; Sociology; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.012045027320488202,"score_gpt":0.2512316205423697,"score_spread":0.2391865932218815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945129323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.766451,0.00018587461,0.00010207094,0.007829942,0.000100509445,0.00008010742,0.0000019746874,0.0000022447705,0.2252463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963664,0.00009625773,0.00059311907,0.0023372879,0.00011859223,6.349361e-7,2.0287168e-7,0.000004645132,0.00048290545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994033,0.000036108966,0.00017193939,0.00008120713,0.00014681178,0.00016061205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999694,0.0000364881,0.00010378845,0.000054714204,0.000023200511,0.00008782635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064113183,0.00005839593,0.0001280891,0.000005708387,0.00028360786,0.00007773217,0.00008632277,0.000061911545,0.000014961297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000076110555,0.000038393864,0.0000720159,0.000042954518,0.00020141708,0.0002691054,0.000028455002,0.00020616374,0.000001509786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025421266,0.00001422903,0.004769057,0.000003901564,0.000017148699,3.2996087e-7,0.06560761,0.000031730382,0.0000029136243,0.92927295,0.0001898624,0.00008772656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016808083,0.00015393872,0.42437193,0.00011316246,0.00002406988,0.000052457854,0.119625665,0.0001691282,0.000005035497,0.16678578,0.28667066,0.000347368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067661714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002616301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7624872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007962349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007884951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21813111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135892919","doi":"10.1017/als.2020.43","title":"Relational Dignity, State Law, and Chinese Leftover Women’s Choices in Marriage and Childbearing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.021432059844487,"score_gpt":0.27711023107054455,"score_spread":0.25567817122605757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135892919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9441246,0.0011251494,0.000012846403,0.0013573228,0.00008481713,0.00002613745,0.0000063269977,0.0000044686885,0.053258374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99745476,0.0013599849,0.00034802395,0.0004672521,0.00010536207,7.4340534e-7,8.4153504e-7,0.0000037358436,0.00025926818],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991617,0.00011484898,0.00019824278,0.0001236341,0.00022347558,0.00017806202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957424,0.00008034744,0.00010376778,0.00003888844,0.00005049925,0.000152234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007518286,0.000078225254,0.0001701799,0.000021181077,0.0003762659,0.00016868832,0.000055201144,0.000062289066,0.00004464367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002408665,0.00006343169,0.000056392942,0.00011623379,0.00034664862,0.0004458184,0.000048798203,0.00022030484,1.4806164e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016256774,0.000072782415,0.59548074,0.00003579594,0.00015110977,0.000038321068,0.25910538,0.0000028789236,0.00004354486,0.1374578,0.00008137575,0.0075140195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008262132,0.000046149067,0.8966496,0.00005084992,0.000012669477,0.000033833312,0.023818467,0.0000075509565,0.000003937589,0.06743339,0.010987576,0.00012977014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022743423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004277922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3011689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001871961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006706094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28939712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193138790","doi":"10.1017/als.2020.40","title":"Dignity Discourses in Struggles for Basic Legal Freedoms in China","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Law; Sociology; Politics; China; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010464214907960994,"score_gpt":0.2838021057073832,"score_spread":0.27333789079942217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193138790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9758305,0.0006506824,0.00006493985,0.0064692856,0.00021731421,0.00007634504,0.000017467142,0.0000026390765,0.016670829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976799,0.00080367987,0.0006138475,0.00023881606,0.0002948445,0.000001696634,0.0000010358907,0.0000055686473,0.00036064797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921286,0.000055413337,0.00028187924,0.00010691857,0.00013254637,0.00021036614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958485,0.00005907483,0.00017641616,0.000055292872,0.00004137919,0.000083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071202737,0.000074485426,0.0002359438,0.00001021808,0.00020624555,0.000098170596,0.00011469441,0.000078937635,0.00002334055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050159117,0.00006134549,0.00019809774,0.0000692272,0.00027729786,0.0005281104,0.000021235917,0.00021795633,2.6336008e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042883134,0.0002781839,0.08216776,0.00006431377,0.00008347141,0.00006454277,0.22013064,0.00002436237,0.00007376256,0.6746597,0.0020325554,0.02037778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041994466,0.00018764718,0.52620155,0.0003095264,0.000034791927,0.000040313138,0.195575,0.00006322651,0.00016953608,0.13663964,0.13615327,0.00042604393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017123548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015100034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53802013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013442813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031171105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84261733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383738636","doi":"10.1017/als.2023.4","title":"Making Love Legible: Queering Indian Legal Conceptions of “Family”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Queer; Family law; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Normative; Law; Sociology; Family life; Constitutional law; Annulment; Political science; Commission; Gender studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10363041886401944,"score_gpt":0.3866797204384451,"score_spread":0.28304930157442565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383738636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.769967,0.001107595,0.0002723546,0.008093731,0.0010966458,0.00013340321,0.000026070533,0.00003924744,0.21926391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974072,0.0007315389,0.00033473969,0.00038689547,0.0003563918,3.7295968e-7,6.259085e-7,0.0000062247063,0.00077602034],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900216,0.00008574498,0.000288521,0.00008497047,0.00031091913,0.00022768127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994724,0.00008222075,0.00018556495,0.00005980032,0.00011232524,0.00008769107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009389441,0.00007417696,0.00022007353,0.000029763245,0.00041966574,0.000058920916,0.00013056076,0.00008118131,0.000014950817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004410741,0.00006805512,0.00016769308,0.00022478637,0.00057489856,0.00022334838,0.000037964877,0.0001796941,0.00000406124],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059965596,0.000024492107,0.003404641,0.000042719028,0.0001805437,0.000023032711,0.89713126,0.000010678695,0.00024136296,0.090180285,0.007450593,0.0013043947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027967297,0.000072609946,0.012003207,0.000071533446,0.000028714392,0.000008630652,0.914663,0.0000059840445,0.000023426446,0.0015009962,0.07124222,0.00009999202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002490707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028617153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22744015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003890577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016417897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3227772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387341155","doi":"10.1017/als.2023.9","title":"Neocolonial Digitality: Analyzing Digital Legal Databases Using Legal Pluralism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"India Diabetes Research Foundation; York University; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete; Social Science Research Council; ALS Association","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Colonialism; Law; Islam; Sociology; Legal research; Political science; Legal realism; Epistemology; Geography","score_opus":0.039455677286023505,"score_gpt":0.3298071606594894,"score_spread":0.2903514833734659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387341155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92904043,0.00055785844,0.0003654884,0.008640018,0.0009878718,0.00019252172,0.0001310865,0.00011674775,0.059967995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651086,0.00022481085,0.00052106765,0.0005047407,0.0012310841,7.391315e-7,0.000008473709,0.00001225838,0.0009859459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855715,0.000081210565,0.0003306636,0.00015683664,0.000496217,0.0003778934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919593,0.00009233563,0.0002215152,0.00009724494,0.00016040065,0.00023259911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074084883,0.00013265692,0.0002619887,0.000008547408,0.0011736535,0.0007831899,0.00021743732,0.00012158354,0.000024362613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000088460714,0.00011111507,0.0004273986,0.00034945933,0.00071178185,0.0025154443,0.00008072057,0.0003272695,0.000004030854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006536806,0.00019887088,0.0068999534,0.00008399128,0.0010022727,0.0006281537,0.2376627,0.00035572317,0.00036110205,0.7139578,0.02907781,0.009706285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006265699,0.00006618725,0.0005626897,0.00013009095,0.000111746565,0.00008750582,0.090928935,0.00016787904,0.000027351212,0.0023265416,0.9046422,0.00032227236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027558432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000085493026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8755644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000807645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023806008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90269125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393379232","doi":"10.1017/als.2024.4","title":"Interrogating the Drunkards and Representing Drunkenness in the Qing Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02522162318504462,"score_gpt":0.3128171219883817,"score_spread":0.28759549880333707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393379232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6617062,0.0037649912,0.000041861036,0.03256473,0.00065773464,0.00010415993,0.0000015161547,0.000014736487,0.30114406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823534,0.00005945787,0.000076643795,0.000937165,0.0006407941,7.788678e-7,1.2409816e-7,0.000004272042,0.000045432098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918216,0.00023793685,0.0001881897,0.00008279827,0.00020165162,0.00010723087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995446,0.0002566306,0.000070128684,0.000061272855,0.000028772389,0.000038556158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027170193,0.00005799939,0.000099474346,0.000009745429,0.0008829866,0.00026384497,0.00016157379,0.00004293993,0.0000054893358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044132314,0.000032033076,0.00011542378,0.0001253083,0.00048768544,0.00029417945,0.0000251765,0.00038454618,3.5762378e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018246752,0.0000054682178,0.00020729812,0.000017322263,0.00001756506,0.000017590264,0.47515026,0.000001084454,0.000028905071,0.52334595,0.00013499988,0.0010717425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039406255,0.000059405043,0.0010614767,0.0006328712,0.000080524005,0.00019803648,0.39067462,0.00025445208,0.000022139991,0.44041854,0.1659975,0.00020636998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028597735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086221227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33652914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024316261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000396235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67913085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402691224","doi":"10.1017/als.2024.15","title":"Re-cloistered Feminine Space: Chinese Women’s Prison in Shanghai, 1888–1912","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Historical Gender and Feminism Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Space (punctuation); Aesthetics; Gender studies; Sociology; Criminology; Art; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02101687155801769,"score_gpt":0.30907932425524365,"score_spread":0.28806245269722597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402691224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20826459,0.012152247,0.0001398615,0.011242285,0.0018190268,0.00017607867,0.000009576432,0.00005665532,0.7661397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946819,0.0012056731,0.0003241446,0.00038600442,0.00059228373,0.0000034161626,3.38352e-7,0.000009492936,0.0027967303],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988645,0.00008082033,0.00030331587,0.00014249551,0.000312927,0.00029598692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953043,0.00009634854,0.00007940075,0.000062791136,0.00004231225,0.00018869717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010487236,0.00011220854,0.00028205113,0.000033113207,0.00029773577,0.00009600708,0.00013114013,0.000107180516,0.00008427001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005605862,0.000085525615,0.00016735446,0.00027315516,0.00026131317,0.00019575351,0.0000339623,0.00031826412,0.000004226231],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013374079,0.00004278682,0.0037094024,0.00004528394,0.000072577495,0.000060104125,0.97854483,3.2306062e-7,0.00002671557,0.005759115,0.008396273,0.0033292174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072029873,0.00029062072,0.01104855,0.00017410581,0.00003651337,0.000016569267,0.6575914,0.000019814273,0.0000060786783,0.0076377694,0.3221744,0.00028387623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000118032985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021049546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7864173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002810837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010473667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34876335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403304366","doi":"10.1017/als.2024.20","title":"Concretising the Legal Professional Community in Late Imperial China, c. 1700–1900","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"China; History of China; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.019774621788217896,"score_gpt":0.3084759807976479,"score_spread":0.28870135900943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403304366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91836107,0.0009813446,0.000010954244,0.0112580815,0.0015088887,0.00006450642,0.000005117802,0.000010376809,0.06779965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99816203,0.000057243597,0.00006028643,0.0005533849,0.0008826057,6.515604e-7,8.1595533e-7,0.000005578462,0.00027740625],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987854,0.00060033705,0.00021215242,0.000056474943,0.00022443403,0.00012121259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961233,0.00014330499,0.00006976423,0.00006451514,0.00003330931,0.00007678151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022114788,0.000071333976,0.00014075871,0.000013972794,0.0012568402,0.00013834066,0.00018390591,0.00008358259,0.00004611954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032077987,0.00004572235,0.0001606605,0.00011748029,0.00057699945,0.00034977993,0.000034066215,0.0009015513,0.0000014631784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028628541,0.000027325252,0.00016117701,0.000024444776,0.000037753256,0.00003123946,0.56138164,0.000005052732,0.00015326931,0.43546945,0.0016564747,0.0010235267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087696034,0.0001565916,0.004532029,0.00047898674,0.000051176565,0.00007238944,0.015458229,0.00012377228,0.000020220823,0.6715337,0.3064619,0.00023407002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007152411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042888548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5459234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006670345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002465569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9666726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405002944","doi":"10.1017/als.2024.34","title":"Global Disruption and Societal Shifts in the Early Days of COVID-19 - Reconfiguring Global Societies in the Pre-Vaccination Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Edited by Jack Fong. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2024. 424 pp. Paper Back: US$52.95","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Vaccination; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Political science; Virology; Sociology; History; Medicine; Outbreak; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Internal medicine","score_opus":0.03477197275971406,"score_gpt":0.29998961603806307,"score_spread":0.265217643278349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405002944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92552024,0.055295967,0.0010142571,0.007642185,0.00048377717,0.0006928643,0.0013955885,0.0000122393785,0.007942894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892328,0.009392332,0.000059235263,0.0011692533,0.00008189985,0.0000012100901,0.0000073398833,0.0000070682954,0.000048854017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850565,0.00018460042,0.00067334744,0.00023331419,0.00017713274,0.00022596908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875474,0.0002669244,0.0006131577,0.00020692084,0.00004603954,0.000112201225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023258373,0.0001670972,0.00040416178,0.0000060138764,0.00014599616,0.00008166315,0.00040890925,0.0002072153,0.00013636202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001638287,0.00012361577,0.00031255026,0.00015008729,0.00028214164,0.0008677719,0.000080260324,0.00024696617,2.8148372e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005816165,0.0006862401,0.4645682,0.0020773218,0.00089878147,0.000016915488,0.2684304,0.0003442843,0.0002868218,0.076427475,0.18221036,0.003471578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0133494325,0.0011483111,0.5902861,0.00040723922,0.00035116306,0.00016464292,0.08411035,0.0034024643,0.000017000542,0.03245674,0.27351415,0.0007924004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015759781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007006799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18432006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010617182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027023756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99079436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406779592","doi":"10.1017/als.2024.30","title":"The Digital Silk Road: “Tech-Diplomacy” as a Paradigm for Understanding Technological Adoption and Emerging Digital Regulations in MENA","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Economic and Technological Innovation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Qatar National Research Fund; Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg; Qatar Foundation","keywords":"Diplomacy; SILK; Business; Political science; Engineering; Telecommunications; Politics","score_opus":0.038481915395034975,"score_gpt":0.254496331010581,"score_spread":0.21601441561554602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406779592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7730549,0.0023118125,0.10676336,0.02589829,0.00017209374,0.00043607719,0.0000507521,0.00006306289,0.091249645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991846,0.00018308946,0.00037035486,0.00011927546,0.000018405677,0.000005474473,0.0000025383247,0.000004467026,0.00011177418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992205,0.0000029876953,0.00048426708,0.00013412313,0.000018671137,0.00013947822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995496,0.00007920302,0.00025782117,0.0000747795,0.000015228238,0.000023364433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040462113,0.00007755468,0.00019309214,0.000070830836,0.00025829696,0.0002542323,0.000094088755,0.00012773623,0.0000021921435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009575451,0.00006315741,0.00009087605,0.00016501152,0.00024316002,0.0003906913,0.00003930005,0.00018090478,7.071546e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000933456,0.000017914048,0.0045545283,0.0000060299994,0.000038112656,5.919289e-7,0.00013889419,0.0000037762757,0.0000032117496,0.98689437,0.00006752691,0.008265699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050934084,0.00007153125,0.004216293,0.000028263747,0.0000041629874,0.0000120461,0.0031097764,0.0007586325,0.0000067112774,0.981512,0.009695084,0.00007613021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000018460618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018734446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22612971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010820022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011626341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25754845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408662997","doi":"10.1017/als.2024.22","title":"Law, Politics, and the Academy in Asia: Navigating Constraints as Public Law Scholars","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Public law","score_opus":0.022090998505550047,"score_gpt":0.32502085543500137,"score_spread":0.3029298569294513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408662997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19121046,0.0007284329,0.000026195357,0.07642935,0.00018836098,0.00016702991,0.0000024730734,0.00001056501,0.7312371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914268,0.00021211077,0.00047894457,0.00748913,0.00009196248,0.000001126337,2.4178306e-7,0.0000033803647,0.00029630752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883986,0.00021748329,0.0003258313,0.00010138683,0.0002545683,0.00026086677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994685,0.00013847879,0.00012879627,0.00004134556,0.000078724595,0.00014413364],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022505336,0.00008087938,0.0002025507,0.000012162026,0.0012135736,0.00035492473,0.00016510098,0.00012487354,0.00003514317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005817397,0.000051580384,0.000091443384,0.0000922515,0.0028425644,0.0003738832,0.000045911514,0.0006345644,0.0000010434604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024210844,0.000011154168,0.0003867123,0.000006638871,0.000042732157,0.0000056473473,0.035130393,5.042322e-8,0.0000023492428,0.9628008,0.0001698877,0.0014412312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023022043,0.000025531666,0.00265208,0.00030635804,0.00003218819,0.000037940143,0.09553627,0.0000035391301,0.00003877353,0.668456,0.23045778,0.0001513028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052111846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006080363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8002163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006806477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026645843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}