{"meta":{"query_hash":"9609d8fc4acc","filters":{"venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/9609d8fc4acc","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Asian+Journal+of+Law+and+Society"},"results":[{"id":"W2118390776","doi":"10.1017/als.2013.9","title":"The Trial of Li Zhuang: Chinese Lawyers’ Collective Action against Populism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Wisconsin-Madison; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete; American Bar Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Populism; Ideology; Legitimacy; Political science; Politics; Solidarity; Law; Accountability; Collective action; Autonomy; China; Legalism (Western philosophy); Mobilization; Public administration","score_opus":0.024852095963881472,"score_gpt":0.3081719559403569,"score_spread":0.2833198599764754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118390776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8382131,0.00077980047,0.0013753234,0.06337995,0.00042811868,0.00012935286,0.000015746911,0.00003428863,0.095644385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98907125,0.00006382976,0.000118493204,0.003001882,0.00008189559,0.000025228588,0.000003257934,0.0000044063117,0.0076296153],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99012417,0.0037983123,0.00021883576,0.0010608656,0.0015141371,0.0032836983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914213,0.004131136,0.0009702034,0.00073054404,0.0008661058,0.0018807302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0130961705,0.00042562583,0.0005453424,0.0016325474,0.037454482,0.009748193,0.0018383038,0.0076265857,0.006093962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013645503,0.00038227733,0.000423078,0.0015101483,0.027704345,0.0031486826,0.011127888,0.008595171,0.00034670052],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016143834,0.00017721068,0.025089202,0.00013890177,0.00008368948,0.0067022336,0.5483662,0.0004262523,0.002751377,0.3648477,0.024581397,0.026674444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021887898,0.0002605094,0.03614576,0.00043005662,0.00020139795,0.0006468203,0.49814355,0.0035185092,0.004198367,0.093233466,0.3627838,0.00021885081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0369065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06324274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037454482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014019727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0144262165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10172069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2484709572","doi":"10.1017/als.2016.44","title":"Mapping the Ecology of China’s Corporate Legal Sector: Globalization and Its Impact on Lawyers and Society","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; China; Emerging markets; Politics; Political science; Economy; Economic system; Political economy; Business; Law; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.041003776972666495,"score_gpt":0.3384627227278139,"score_spread":0.2974589457551474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2484709572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932099,0.00026336356,0.00015601052,0.0005573955,0.0000029271255,0.000012832358,0.000056329372,0.0000032430653,0.005737996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937767,0.00015510223,0.00011428781,0.000035884488,0.0000031911131,0.000004348029,0.00002492482,8.4753634e-7,0.0002836779],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959344,0.0001434868,0.000012794816,0.000060304203,0.000081700506,0.00010831252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990983,0.0002733763,0.00024411362,0.00004698805,0.00014624339,0.00019090036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005789279,0.00014516478,0.00018520546,0.0038077522,0.0016921157,0.0022610065,0.00032683872,0.0003217545,0.0026814651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095719175,0.00013323923,0.00013541344,0.0052954233,0.0026791568,0.0015708728,0.0020609314,0.00034792727,0.00006766628],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035256206,0.00011135659,0.86390543,0.00012844338,0.00003261434,0.00096766785,0.048105586,0.0009428758,0.0018591089,0.031269472,0.0011221948,0.05151999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003179506,0.000042995394,0.9456189,0.000060492013,0.000010972586,0.00008719286,0.04360847,0.0014390871,0.0002503074,0.002922431,0.005944069,0.000011878266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051901177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09874324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051901177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042964006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038932299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10319811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775636802","doi":"10.1017/als.2017.28","title":"Legal Consciousness of the Leftover Woman: Law and Qing in Chinese Family Relations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Legal consciousness; Principle of legality; Consciousness; Law; Feeling; Opposition (politics); Legal realism; Political science; Sociology; Comparative law; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.01998852452864801,"score_gpt":0.296026335165586,"score_spread":0.276037810636938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775636802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976749,0.00006592504,0.000019894589,0.00022670781,0.0000026997009,0.000002039198,0.000009317589,3.548052e-7,0.0019980164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996438,0.000041820524,0.000006532179,0.000021985532,0.0000017914547,0.0000011507417,0.000004757671,2.1879548e-7,0.00027786975],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996061,0.000107645574,0.00001858306,0.000047421203,0.000078754274,0.00014153711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989605,0.0002741615,0.00034033757,0.000039407492,0.000107014384,0.00027857345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008068056,0.00012871456,0.00016368071,0.0009787341,0.0026590645,0.0014028556,0.00024174302,0.0002643941,0.003624588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019340382,0.00011937231,0.00011684389,0.0011051707,0.0030543008,0.0013028341,0.0012602084,0.00062117993,0.00007369513],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006050315,0.00008726665,0.5130519,0.00003949858,0.000019470057,0.00070242904,0.46278843,0.00005054851,0.001147588,0.008124076,0.00045439354,0.013473825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037582188,0.000045304874,0.591681,0.00004134291,0.000013567206,0.00018198793,0.40286767,0.0001754772,0.00023046725,0.0012049472,0.0035361066,0.000018331168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06023647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08789013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06023647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022619178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016380589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11977166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900519741","doi":"10.1017/als.2018.35","title":"The Political Origins of Professional Identity: Lawyers, Judges, and Prosecutors in Taiwan’s State Transformation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Identity (music); State (computer science); Politics; Legal profession; Authoritarianism; Political science; Power (physics); Democratization; Economic Justice; Sociology; Independence (probability theory); Democracy","score_opus":0.0159454842176147,"score_gpt":0.31418128497809733,"score_spread":0.2982358007604826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900519741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879424,0.00011506995,0.00015950638,0.0016796634,0.00000879552,0.000005188392,0.0000032807584,0.0000017138881,0.010084302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993668,0.000021580317,0.00002167501,0.000041319363,0.0000024444296,0.0000020548875,0.0000019123434,6.6409893e-7,0.00054145866],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984048,0.0008248653,0.00004474622,0.00014343555,0.00015559599,0.00042655223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683785,0.0014435395,0.00061483297,0.00011266172,0.00036214036,0.0006290122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021871128,0.00008870761,0.0001490481,0.0015646555,0.0073951553,0.005740601,0.0004477623,0.0010978025,0.0023406635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046720114,0.00022284535,0.000089272595,0.0012005441,0.0077804695,0.0019973076,0.0033437824,0.001754937,0.0001395916],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025237745,0.000060200153,0.05264697,0.00001698621,0.00000274914,0.001360327,0.9051494,0.000058099344,0.0005895001,0.03059687,0.00070637645,0.008787292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006578438,0.000027812934,0.045383755,0.00006431018,0.0000035016042,0.00020306688,0.9393002,0.00039760862,0.00023671676,0.003946346,0.010415057,0.000015083935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01952415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0349361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01952415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004066857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038708115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03882104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945129323","doi":"10.1017/als.2018.40","title":"Ordering Power under the Party: A Relational Approach to Law and Politics in China","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Scholarship; Power (physics); Corporate governance; Law; Legal profession; Legal realism; China; Order (exchange); Empirical legal studies; Sociology; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.012045027320488202,"score_gpt":0.2512316205423697,"score_spread":0.2391865932218815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945129323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8692422,0.0005921825,0.00923446,0.0036407833,0.000026713235,0.0001328853,0.00007251411,0.000021575,0.11703662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981869,0.00010933096,0.000314946,0.00003387422,0.0000075170483,0.000014175698,0.0000102203385,0.0000016011071,0.0013214553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890196,0.00043299043,0.000045018103,0.00014938653,0.00021553038,0.0002551398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921894,0.0002249825,0.00019266618,0.00006136454,0.00011536319,0.00018676517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001365738,0.00019506537,0.0002513377,0.0034484856,0.0033954696,0.0042920965,0.0006933127,0.00053238985,0.005147043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015808805,0.0001609735,0.00025768855,0.0030713375,0.008832895,0.002808948,0.0026435542,0.0005278204,0.000100856334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018696952,0.0000408136,0.030453442,0.000052503743,0.000023280272,0.00058565097,0.03409535,0.00244143,0.0004771891,0.91659653,0.0006505117,0.014564547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007013704,0.00017551401,0.17240447,0.00025832347,0.00011912203,0.00033204615,0.12361856,0.045621227,0.0006408438,0.60091037,0.05578291,0.000066481596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05065304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054188304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05065304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010713197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006290444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10071641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135892919","doi":"10.1017/als.2020.43","title":"Relational Dignity, State Law, and Chinese Leftover Women’s Choices in Marriage and Childbearing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.021432059844487,"score_gpt":0.27711023107054455,"score_spread":0.25567817122605757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135892919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977229,0.00012598548,0.000022112603,0.000271085,0.0000031394782,0.0000035173334,0.00003298047,5.4418973e-7,0.0018176961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99942267,0.000081748985,0.000012699011,0.000026202504,0.0000021769122,0.0000021662302,0.000020890398,3.249043e-7,0.00043111583],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961334,0.0000834287,0.000029879713,0.000051704974,0.00008796033,0.00013372386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991905,0.00013264493,0.0003236642,0.000031453994,0.000058198886,0.00026350375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000727844,0.00013730723,0.00013571969,0.00078917487,0.0014348277,0.00090392766,0.0002788441,0.0002418825,0.004155275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016197291,0.00009991917,0.00016921782,0.0009792019,0.0012337643,0.0006993585,0.0008771085,0.00049754605,0.000115724404],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047792564,0.000091313144,0.9433628,0.00003725217,0.000022579163,0.0005787038,0.038554437,0.000076067736,0.0004213098,0.0035512745,0.00036499457,0.0128914835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031603388,0.000067165885,0.95071864,0.00004434054,0.000015824467,0.00017732546,0.044810407,0.0003450251,0.00012490858,0.0009782029,0.0027015554,0.000013397916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044459555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08903388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044459555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001611359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011867321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088401556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193138790","doi":"10.1017/als.2020.40","title":"Dignity Discourses in Struggles for Basic Legal Freedoms in China","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Law; Sociology; Politics; China; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010464214907960994,"score_gpt":0.2838021057073832,"score_spread":0.27333789079942217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193138790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786589,0.0006470418,0.0007079165,0.004979331,0.00004629686,0.000024640096,0.000014474753,0.0000100225625,0.014911332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998818,0.00007718449,0.00006165644,0.00013641562,0.000009318831,0.000006567981,0.0000054709694,0.00000210769,0.0008832856],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99427783,0.0026471233,0.00025668435,0.00058976543,0.0010199484,0.0012085596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934378,0.003558156,0.0012265673,0.00030708843,0.0004134528,0.0010569739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008492576,0.00060097757,0.0007873493,0.0034518763,0.01963681,0.006880017,0.0014694507,0.0025273159,0.0029361355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008476987,0.00035221525,0.00028107254,0.003114357,0.03527483,0.00624488,0.008741755,0.0039303354,0.00008284538],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017913007,0.000017942433,0.006329222,0.00004479271,0.0000064097976,0.0004848037,0.9504039,0.00005721349,0.00053810544,0.03736213,0.00033161943,0.0044059693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000115247885,0.000040444953,0.014865261,0.00015679564,0.000012099272,0.00011348132,0.9405242,0.0005668647,0.00048632003,0.017080683,0.026094096,0.000048208265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043025058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04468206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043025058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01967312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010956482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14273918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383738636","doi":"10.1017/als.2023.4","title":"Making Love Legible: Queering Indian Legal Conceptions of “Family”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Queer; Family law; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Normative; Law; Sociology; Family life; Constitutional law; Annulment; Political science; Commission; Gender studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10363041886401944,"score_gpt":0.3866797204384451,"score_spread":0.28304930157442565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383738636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.114692524,0.0028749371,0.007460544,0.05667814,0.00039895883,0.000035867364,0.000064002656,0.00008100004,0.817714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892118,0.00050581957,0.00056886073,0.002034988,0.00005194061,0.000011612528,0.0000075031194,0.00001876545,0.007588727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577844,0.0022849014,0.00009855126,0.00029781795,0.000706057,0.0008342675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99543023,0.0022552658,0.0002889928,0.0007251569,0.0008314199,0.0004690888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005450727,0.00021005527,0.00023420682,0.0017346647,0.0190843,0.01168755,0.0014876428,0.0021077832,0.0033220807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065344404,0.00024048665,0.0003156189,0.0015304238,0.06733185,0.0063275243,0.005748832,0.0065385494,0.00024345212],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050560925,0.0000048160437,0.00035724032,0.0000068542927,0.0000013890377,0.00007697164,0.061575,0.0000537238,0.000057201392,0.93325984,0.0017864795,0.0028153795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012552896,0.000032174266,0.003912497,0.00031897775,0.0000403286,0.0005414846,0.19589882,0.0009434132,0.0007233341,0.4590889,0.33840397,0.000083638384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1808577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21750925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1808577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017040085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01166754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35961002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387341155","doi":"10.1017/als.2023.9","title":"Neocolonial Digitality: Analyzing Digital Legal Databases Using Legal Pluralism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"India Diabetes Research Foundation; York University; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete; Social Science Research Council; ALS Association","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Colonialism; Law; Islam; Sociology; Legal research; Political science; Legal realism; Epistemology; Geography","score_opus":0.039455677286023505,"score_gpt":0.3298071606594894,"score_spread":0.2903514833734659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387341155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96068054,0.000493602,0.0033597217,0.0015712706,0.000014713778,0.00014444356,0.0004432017,0.000012085866,0.03328043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971541,0.00018928936,0.0018510377,0.000055075103,0.000007079648,0.00005169477,0.00017572126,0.000007101882,0.00050894124],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959967,0.0021019713,0.00034121357,0.0003566134,0.0008659225,0.00033755397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96671236,0.02347557,0.0041716467,0.0019688727,0.0029149659,0.0007567046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005462025,0.00014924521,0.0002810886,0.010015763,0.0028921198,0.009591053,0.00088591076,0.00061830104,0.004321784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029192558,0.00018299698,0.00019776062,0.019121408,0.006658134,0.010209512,0.006403424,0.0010684992,0.0002680851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012640675,0.00024734705,0.3215539,0.0005162065,0.00008234471,0.0016905523,0.28470933,0.0016652087,0.0005874389,0.2800502,0.0027337978,0.10603722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013847865,0.000052471947,0.15044586,0.00048332073,0.000041535815,0.0004931867,0.74190086,0.008406204,0.0006997441,0.04463558,0.052794885,0.00003252435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011223645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01570763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011223645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005055264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023092357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03667867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393379232","doi":"10.1017/als.2024.4","title":"Interrogating the Drunkards and Representing Drunkenness in the Qing Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02522162318504462,"score_gpt":0.3128171219883817,"score_spread":0.28759549880333707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393379232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.985365,0.00014452699,0.00047499788,0.0016582764,0.000023678453,0.000013601723,0.000019156423,0.000006965988,0.012293678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991491,0.000059926493,0.000085801534,0.00016360752,0.000010134754,0.000003965732,0.000006840659,0.0000024584767,0.0005181028],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973532,0.0017473618,0.00009067995,0.00013872847,0.00029227158,0.000377769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958871,0.0018875747,0.0011014789,0.0002115301,0.0005324571,0.00037989824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043252283,0.000252086,0.00019555289,0.0016404917,0.0074642813,0.004261795,0.0007747517,0.001604255,0.001849055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058994694,0.00027687656,0.00016713257,0.0010857385,0.01276353,0.0037146537,0.0031060467,0.002348786,0.00011245661],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025895395,0.00003222436,0.016898928,0.000025476716,0.000004525923,0.00070865813,0.9638262,0.000033858327,0.00079109624,0.01353199,0.00061949645,0.0035016863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039160623,0.000042569813,0.030517776,0.00007204476,0.00000880207,0.00023362723,0.9505648,0.00044947464,0.000455379,0.003935964,0.01368785,0.000027760845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045482874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058689326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045482874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053257984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020481446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09043628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402691224","doi":"10.1017/als.2024.15","title":"Re-cloistered Feminine Space: Chinese Women’s Prison in Shanghai, 1888–1912","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Historical Gender and Feminism Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Space (punctuation); Aesthetics; Gender studies; Sociology; Criminology; Art; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02101687155801769,"score_gpt":0.30907932425524365,"score_spread":0.28806245269722597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402691224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829798,0.000813826,0.000087033106,0.0018037223,0.00006904197,0.000012771042,0.000044301796,0.00000687828,0.014182635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927891,0.00023875963,0.000021256397,0.00011364929,0.000016148239,0.000006761685,0.000015361042,0.0000025513843,0.0067966203],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995546,0.00009618388,0.0000128839465,0.00004366005,0.000044118453,0.00024865541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971145,0.000042884592,0.000058314028,0.000017253004,0.000048832047,0.00012128389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007104896,0.0003850425,0.00022866121,0.001139757,0.008330416,0.0015365389,0.00042966942,0.00062201975,0.0035638344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005681,0.0002556174,0.00016680047,0.0012181347,0.0062827915,0.0010152304,0.0019494893,0.0010697967,0.00014851581],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009488278,0.00003482011,0.03696997,0.00014103597,0.000012883478,0.0028037936,0.8874516,0.00015929338,0.0017249662,0.051539015,0.0035169781,0.01555074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019391306,0.00029732427,0.25889182,0.00025980934,0.000041900803,0.0010430681,0.5605232,0.00035975143,0.0020300609,0.0025154403,0.1739265,0.00009163129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18719736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3915085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18719736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009769584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005448254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3722155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403304366","doi":"10.1017/als.2024.20","title":"Concretising the Legal Professional Community in Late Imperial China, c. 1700–1900","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"China; History of China; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.019774621788217896,"score_gpt":0.3084759807976479,"score_spread":0.28870135900943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403304366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900159,0.00027252958,0.000101327576,0.00041915747,0.00001037726,0.000010795058,0.000027197431,0.0000048098245,0.009137905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967438,0.000118590746,0.00006154836,0.0000325106,0.000010361346,0.0000046538717,0.000025193887,0.0000023886269,0.0030009223],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993339,0.00011958679,0.000028290511,0.00009924367,0.00019290218,0.00022609186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985191,0.00034157862,0.00026586317,0.000066655906,0.00029637778,0.000510367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016716556,0.0001718253,0.00020613238,0.0036963248,0.0071622636,0.0022533487,0.00046262538,0.00041028706,0.0028521544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022284237,0.00021670082,0.00007343564,0.003304707,0.0044809673,0.0015048018,0.0022953455,0.00058988616,0.00014106228],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041573054,0.00003003521,0.06409808,0.000093900104,0.00000867806,0.0011538317,0.8705138,0.00011753251,0.0012980007,0.025133677,0.0021823219,0.03532859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014106578,0.00008321219,0.51272887,0.00016035991,0.000015634525,0.0005469874,0.37142494,0.0009984948,0.00080926734,0.0036386931,0.1095376,0.000041905772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078552894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1715181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078552894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007258001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069428687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15619135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405002944","doi":"10.1017/als.2024.34","title":"Global Disruption and Societal Shifts in the Early Days of COVID-19 - Reconfiguring Global Societies in the Pre-Vaccination Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Edited by Jack Fong. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2024. 424 pp. Paper Back: US$52.95","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Vaccination; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Political science; Virology; Sociology; History; Medicine; Outbreak; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Internal medicine","score_opus":0.03477197275971406,"score_gpt":0.29998961603806307,"score_spread":0.265217643278349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405002944","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015182428,0.7100617,0.0011486018,0.21613805,0.0063742637,0.000025809426,0.0015382015,0.000054898195,0.04947601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3080538,0.6323908,0.0010427687,0.0067059444,0.003346347,0.00004077476,0.00088527164,0.00009711579,0.047437217],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966383,0.00013203264,0.000014166486,0.000030863703,0.000070486065,0.00008870459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933976,0.00022635747,0.00009096713,0.000026882857,0.00013066552,0.00018523168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088923104,0.0008022739,0.0004230457,0.0010981524,0.0017770681,0.004177532,0.0004705435,0.0019304537,0.0063162614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018109822,0.00043018378,0.00033905555,0.0036384529,0.0043722265,0.0035479446,0.0017634202,0.0019409392,0.00064671034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009251724,0.000023924787,0.0054520275,0.0009895742,0.00006647156,0.0006169434,0.018835725,0.002110228,0.0003146809,0.1734652,0.7114072,0.086625576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010045648,0.00002732269,0.044016823,0.0017626433,0.0000352715,0.00029450664,0.02161188,0.00037082587,0.00017821968,0.07872668,0.85290855,0.000057254238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2346594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47600135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2346594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012200417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00743671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46658707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406779592","doi":"10.1017/als.2024.30","title":"The Digital Silk Road: “Tech-Diplomacy” as a Paradigm for Understanding Technological Adoption and Emerging Digital Regulations in MENA","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Economic and Technological Innovation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Qatar National Research Fund; Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg; Qatar Foundation","keywords":"Diplomacy; SILK; Business; Political science; Engineering; Telecommunications; Politics","score_opus":0.038481915395034975,"score_gpt":0.254496331010581,"score_spread":0.21601441561554602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406779592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16581154,0.0055940347,0.06533594,0.038399126,0.0002792268,0.00018639154,0.00011190699,0.000060969054,0.724221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98747396,0.0010068559,0.0045687244,0.0010571763,0.00009776331,0.00014024864,0.00002481182,0.000021959802,0.005608459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958972,0.002748817,0.0001331326,0.00041273425,0.0004222477,0.00038590786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99438196,0.0034840002,0.0009232077,0.0005486109,0.00036805272,0.00029420832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006818247,0.00034492373,0.00038797624,0.0034730614,0.0047139777,0.012681214,0.0015770025,0.0036893266,0.004411487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005629349,0.00028840124,0.0005445441,0.002326237,0.046938065,0.017710308,0.0066219894,0.004215572,0.00040658432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016142094,0.0000051820484,0.00021448893,0.000007487141,6.205504e-7,0.000037467817,0.005181241,0.00006008109,0.000024187902,0.99359846,0.000100540536,0.00076863397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000112168655,0.000033089094,0.0027163464,0.00042801508,0.000008553206,0.00026723134,0.04437489,0.0033247552,0.00030780854,0.84917015,0.099330194,0.00002770015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063436567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004627104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012681214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075974194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037532984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05512339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408662997","doi":"10.1017/als.2024.22","title":"Law, Politics, and the Academy in Asia: Navigating Constraints as Public Law Scholars","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Public law","score_opus":0.022090998505550047,"score_gpt":0.32502085543500137,"score_spread":0.3029298569294513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408662997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6545852,0.0057783322,0.0024299491,0.079953976,0.00045065684,0.000037811926,0.000043667766,0.0000440604,0.25667632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941995,0.0009673041,0.000294578,0.001711432,0.00006279462,0.000015143523,0.0000074876634,0.000010630318,0.0027311582],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916882,0.0053362832,0.00036102638,0.000497783,0.0009213041,0.0011954223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97640115,0.01165256,0.0031249106,0.0012896147,0.0020693415,0.005462445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017484851,0.0003018271,0.00057623105,0.0041139736,0.017477177,0.03060079,0.0015917675,0.0024026027,0.006491153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014523139,0.00042167158,0.00028023342,0.0039309054,0.04397531,0.017784286,0.025945315,0.006417425,0.00048597483],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003817107,0.000083843166,0.01679301,0.0001642965,0.000016952128,0.00057564257,0.6302098,0.00021545174,0.00040618834,0.3270745,0.0027540883,0.021668078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008733625,0.00006031083,0.008188567,0.0005240603,0.00001694558,0.0002064479,0.8203987,0.00037372194,0.000302027,0.08353974,0.0863439,0.000036866077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052895043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008231437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03060079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010595309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01948812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09246987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}