{"meta":{"query_hash":"36d78b6c9c0f","filters":{"venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/36d78b6c9c0f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Aslib+Journal+of+Information+Management"},"results":[{"id":"W1881217392","doi":"10.1108/ajim-02-2015-0027","title":"Computer science in Eastern Europe 1989-2014: a bibliometric study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"Big Data and Digital Economy","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Originality; Library science; Web of science; Citation; Bibliometrics; Regional science; Subject (documents); Period (music); Political science; Social science; Geography; Sociology; Computer science; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.044049275828551636,"score_gpt":0.270503925167112,"score_spread":0.22645464933856038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1881217392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9644578,0.014825227,0.00029226573,0.00056312035,0.000037285135,0.00006930178,0.006254142,0.000027656428,0.013473251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801301,0.01097008,0.0006282051,0.000111469875,0.00010628804,0.000049386406,0.006417583,0.000010429046,0.0015763858],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970132,0.0005102654,0.00083653565,0.00028340676,0.0011287315,0.00022790188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892804,0.0034926431,0.004305891,0.00039991445,0.0020955321,0.00042564565],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036778501,0.00023388103,0.0007150719,0.039503522,0.00092869624,0.0035418742,0.000353444,0.0004870521,0.0019897788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010241687,0.0001582398,0.00044242106,0.081789896,0.0005618567,0.0023926755,0.0017294276,0.00025636327,0.0005305793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017531628,0.00011567791,0.90642303,0.0014398263,0.00034545056,0.0005182243,0.0027893374,0.000584348,0.00025322562,0.0023988124,0.0034309146,0.081525855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055738606,0.00004272464,0.9835666,0.00027382694,0.00010512371,0.00028690658,0.0019753526,0.00022729838,0.00020260304,0.0001528752,0.013153694,0.0000074376608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073317993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077580726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9604965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019107452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021331364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019450545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1952399979","doi":"10.1108/ajim-03-2015-0049","title":"The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Subject (documents); Originality; Scholarly communication; Value (mathematics); Library science; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Publishing; Social science; Qualitative research; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.2653638725223654,"score_gpt":0.46011301814876754,"score_spread":0.19474914562640216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1952399979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5279923,0.035113636,0.014042011,0.06828579,0.0030824062,0.00062697456,0.0020635114,0.0015336266,0.34725976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98087925,0.00512083,0.004733903,0.001266288,0.00115074,0.00023519139,0.00044229373,0.00032012424,0.0058512343],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8694347,0.06469708,0.012756451,0.00630169,0.04303611,0.0037739098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.30178002,0.5180101,0.077181116,0.021174267,0.05995069,0.021903828],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08939977,0.0005044448,0.0011954352,0.043859325,0.006407867,0.027744334,0.0030179108,0.0028389518,0.01831882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5022194,0.0005351081,0.00053724746,0.06821108,0.011921675,0.02410043,0.013032058,0.0024437087,0.00372843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005567468,0.0003059842,0.20396715,0.004449315,0.0002983248,0.0012508467,0.06395973,0.00093987497,0.0007407728,0.17276631,0.047651958,0.503113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027543958,0.0007057625,0.40633085,0.011682957,0.00047198322,0.0030209133,0.11393869,0.0054563605,0.0016420943,0.13482742,0.32103395,0.00061351777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009071453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006871834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97225565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010826621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02738599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4727968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003199334","doi":"10.1108/ajim-11-2013-0127","title":"A multidimensional analysis of Aslib proceedings – using everything but the impact factor","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Originality; Strengths and weaknesses; Citation; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Value (mathematics); Citation impact; Citation analysis; Data science; Library science; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Law; Qualitative research; Social psychology","score_opus":0.3448193613516742,"score_gpt":0.5221124057526471,"score_spread":0.17729304440097288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003199334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.764916,0.005431175,0.08616781,0.0032149723,0.00072987983,0.002089802,0.008301587,0.0010457698,0.12810306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9323214,0.001414011,0.0588419,0.00015771973,0.00030644186,0.0011005799,0.002288368,0.00015207227,0.0034174244],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830593,0.005059824,0.001989745,0.0008535424,0.008597993,0.0004396355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9415221,0.027823031,0.010448408,0.003512084,0.015042775,0.001651656],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01457422,0.00077374384,0.00086780277,0.04085487,0.0016518114,0.008796259,0.00055876136,0.00054200925,0.006273436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047920246,0.00017279417,0.0011867016,0.035931047,0.0017832188,0.004335833,0.002496818,0.00092777784,0.0008249961],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000561509,0.0005817932,0.26172802,0.0049543697,0.0009298589,0.00060381467,0.01933276,0.0028235163,0.008001667,0.0709055,0.0188677,0.61070955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000598912,0.0010978347,0.77767086,0.0015970995,0.00059308525,0.001345498,0.033545423,0.013674147,0.0074801883,0.05030896,0.11227243,0.0003546198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015542442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012404113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9854258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023237837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028176687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07707673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510806312","doi":"10.1108/ajim-09-2015-0147","title":"Canadian public libraries and search engines: barriers to visibility","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"Web Data Mining and Analysis","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Visibility; Originality; Value (mathematics); Thematic analysis; Computer science; Thematic map; Search analytics; Search engine optimization; Search engine; Public relations; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Data science; Sociology; Political science; Qualitative research; Geography; Web search query; Social science","score_opus":0.00982251207246257,"score_gpt":0.21449286144593374,"score_spread":0.20467034937347117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510806312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8682121,0.0047707874,0.0017969306,0.015923023,0.00007592941,0.00023299301,0.00084491825,0.00015430198,0.10798902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99285156,0.0013627674,0.0006802984,0.000563714,0.000015807505,0.000043511016,0.0001308054,0.00002436844,0.004327089],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832743,0.0033330657,0.0008378327,0.00089409394,0.00730377,0.0043569193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93295956,0.031052887,0.00945428,0.0021441814,0.016464384,0.007924652],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009219565,0.00034560013,0.0007018145,0.005671037,0.018359099,0.015682666,0.0022922046,0.0011546831,0.009902051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052137144,0.0005295385,0.00045876857,0.017072335,0.007049733,0.0046755406,0.0065844953,0.001328052,0.0005443759],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050462974,0.000307035,0.35625264,0.0032620037,0.00015216635,0.002046813,0.325827,0.0009030182,0.0017285589,0.0488608,0.02543834,0.23471704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045787543,0.0001454498,0.38862845,0.0013632604,0.00014875554,0.0005864059,0.46831462,0.00095771055,0.001157813,0.005384839,0.13303202,0.00023487127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9509953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9537715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98431736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.066682436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15099332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48381722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572829106","doi":"10.1108/ajim-06-2016-0082","title":"Environmental scan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Inuvialuit Regional Corporation; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Stakeholder; Resource (disambiguation); Field (mathematics); Environmental resource management; Environmental design; Computer science; Knowledge management; Sociology; Engineering; Political science; Social science; Qualitative research; Public relations","score_opus":0.019904444279335545,"score_gpt":0.3357856444524778,"score_spread":0.3158812001731423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572829106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063502677,0.0017030645,0.025030056,0.010821265,0.0006981059,0.0009410657,0.006831242,0.0008988095,0.94672614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34720117,0.008477518,0.10107425,0.014640164,0.0004126879,0.0027524494,0.017506823,0.0022033604,0.5057316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889361,0.0024915005,0.00045898985,0.0016647666,0.0047747223,0.0016739861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838898,0.002505847,0.00065918884,0.0026913455,0.009082538,0.0011713331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008642752,0.00082366006,0.00086097495,0.004903716,0.007966094,0.009452925,0.005327981,0.0027003183,0.0925642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021555865,0.0005315081,0.0011737675,0.00936557,0.007785733,0.0077954186,0.009687791,0.0024294264,0.020705387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011149197,0.000082469574,0.01476338,0.0013871174,0.00004813703,0.0006795064,0.007209903,0.0015850143,0.00035242952,0.48111612,0.19609532,0.2965691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011865223,0.000019459458,0.0032527107,0.0009413718,0.00002283956,0.0002345322,0.005043687,0.00040446196,0.00026554975,0.023806322,0.96596956,0.000027680633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36978358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4694909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36978358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017835803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06419947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7352624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749249904","doi":"10.1108/ajim-01-2017-0024","title":"Incorporating data sharing to the reward system of science","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Computer science; Similarity (geometry); Set (abstract data type); Data science; Originality; Data sharing; Information retrieval; Value (mathematics); Data set; Scientometrics; Scale (ratio); World Wide Web; Psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.13976620657204658,"score_gpt":0.3809386428785568,"score_spread":0.2411724363065102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749249904","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18965541,0.0039444277,0.6398966,0.08845523,0.0019196784,0.003157568,0.00187549,0.0016615697,0.06943406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78582853,0.00072255713,0.20806035,0.0016173286,0.0005269198,0.0011688536,0.00053658854,0.00015030235,0.0013884896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5420693,0.37104312,0.028427394,0.017723065,0.035663377,0.005073868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.25455934,0.50148684,0.058329895,0.13335922,0.044210702,0.008054021],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30078575,0.00081551436,0.0021989704,0.014451682,0.007942603,0.022262307,0.004987215,0.0031603603,0.00418784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5976182,0.0011411406,0.0017701221,0.023735432,0.017472731,0.037046514,0.030349698,0.004085178,0.000961457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008226594,0.00050547323,0.06486609,0.0019901877,0.000551144,0.00030130614,0.015999021,0.01296776,0.00090652896,0.5192867,0.0074195312,0.3743837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000225822,0.0006789789,0.019544302,0.0025750129,0.0003694462,0.0004119706,0.008521958,0.04906228,0.0028873682,0.8420732,0.07330253,0.00034715762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059921783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043990645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99501276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015325778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02821679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8622557},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2891139263","doi":"10.1108/ajim-02-2018-0023","title":"The state and evolution of Gold open access: a country and discipline level analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; China; Web of science; Subject (documents); Quarter (Canadian coin); Scale (ratio); Publishing; Library science; Bibliometrics; Political science; Business; Geography; MEDLINE; Computer science; Cartography","score_opus":0.3792237862291387,"score_gpt":0.5586849296211596,"score_spread":0.17946114339202085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891139263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9260417,0.030862961,0.00281705,0.0035574054,0.00019189107,0.00013085121,0.012343689,0.00012276882,0.023931576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917448,0.0035954271,0.0012317926,0.00017734624,0.000081146034,0.00004099359,0.0023029721,0.000034774752,0.0007907402],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880262,0.00248893,0.0029577783,0.0019028152,0.003624053,0.0010003215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88423765,0.042547077,0.045232315,0.006041217,0.01788917,0.004052618],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01147843,0.00024879424,0.0007008607,0.029987218,0.00074095884,0.0054868334,0.0007263027,0.0005885039,0.0036421276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060819086,0.00023471068,0.00088645885,0.045727577,0.0019296721,0.004877507,0.0035529684,0.0007868112,0.00064082065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023866343,0.000049519676,0.8801216,0.0023669132,0.00060722645,0.00047922248,0.004241259,0.00059778034,0.0006518243,0.012518858,0.0038404602,0.09428673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011239016,0.000111039946,0.9611945,0.0015832119,0.00031567155,0.0007371051,0.008582589,0.0007394588,0.000949482,0.0025346123,0.023190906,0.000050170052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006400072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004920299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9992737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017989795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022018128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06070441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981750649","doi":"10.1108/ajim-04-2019-0083","title":"Factors and their relationships in measuring the progress of open government","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Open government; Originality; Transparency (behavior); Information and Communications Technology; Government (linguistics); Accountability; Citizen journalism; Business; Value (mathematics); Freedom of information; Index (typography); Open data; Public economics; Public relations; Accounting; Economics; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.04658912911400558,"score_gpt":0.27591267066393316,"score_spread":0.22932354154992757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981750649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9306974,0.0008887888,0.009039288,0.0010524639,0.00007462417,0.00026287758,0.00047776624,0.00005248494,0.05745427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785393,0.00014290256,0.0015425464,0.000031225303,0.000010771529,0.00003538466,0.00008650203,0.000005155107,0.00029137748],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99017906,0.0044061663,0.0012696186,0.0007489175,0.0025423616,0.0008538794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.951872,0.024148408,0.014116876,0.0029210006,0.0048133307,0.0021283536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009411367,0.00034193092,0.00029776734,0.00418528,0.0011150377,0.0028057138,0.000337744,0.00045203956,0.002916568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034942787,0.00015335972,0.00053105416,0.0059004226,0.0039738,0.002787965,0.0026124911,0.0010922633,0.00028714523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000542456,0.00008219238,0.93656534,0.00025059242,0.00011605783,0.000094744326,0.0044524767,0.0017371468,0.000227516,0.011765002,0.0005613488,0.044093344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007315786,0.00011002608,0.9634749,0.00037391015,0.00006690772,0.00013647506,0.012856773,0.0020584073,0.0006566089,0.0104952585,0.0097159,0.00004752868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003044196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034872566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009411367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018779372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019529373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04977262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984222616","doi":"10.1108/ajim-02-2019-0046","title":"Considering the local and the translocal","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Affordance; Sociology; Originality; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Value (mathematics); Information science; Work (physics); Corporate governance; Social science; Qualitative research; Library science; Political science; Management; Psychology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.009892827209753412,"score_gpt":0.24358202282353386,"score_spread":0.23368919561378046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984222616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42574143,0.020756844,0.115673855,0.09090661,0.0013127878,0.00047306507,0.00036379282,0.000257361,0.3445142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787041,0.0029172052,0.010270066,0.002900823,0.00017578775,0.00019847494,0.000043871438,0.000050280574,0.0047394014],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97807956,0.018314814,0.00044844547,0.0012750023,0.0010418061,0.00084045087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97734946,0.015357559,0.0019146267,0.0030897504,0.0011048125,0.0011837701],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011770275,0.00037582856,0.0006090617,0.0023285456,0.009313378,0.01401064,0.0017150032,0.0023697296,0.0066528753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01682669,0.00036093156,0.0004915325,0.003004016,0.045289595,0.016359821,0.015191167,0.0024323957,0.00068390084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040066512,0.00003866207,0.005545565,0.0005768298,0.000026319924,0.001357722,0.6028071,0.00029904186,0.00071446854,0.35270825,0.0026044478,0.0332816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009507144,0.00006129858,0.002913655,0.0012758817,0.000039649683,0.000691155,0.72409266,0.0002809547,0.0004943657,0.089004815,0.18109882,0.000037140806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054607997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0095509915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98598933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048802113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006111295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062247932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200550639","doi":"10.1108/ajim-01-2021-0016","title":"Opinion mining towards blockchain technology adoption for accessing digital library resources","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"Blockchain Technology Applications and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Blockchain; Computer science; Cryptocurrency; Database transaction; Originality; Quality (philosophy); Resource (disambiguation); World Wide Web; Shared resource; Knowledge management; Computer security; Database","score_opus":0.010096388970854029,"score_gpt":0.23763062770319912,"score_spread":0.2275342387323451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200550639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993884,0.00012195996,0.0020343028,0.0008304016,0.000015607851,0.00008666114,0.00022678135,0.000005593276,0.0027945868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983419,0.00012104083,0.0008590856,0.00010776832,0.000012084273,0.000053780226,0.0001591164,0.0000017644976,0.00034344502],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964205,0.0019532614,0.00025159563,0.00027477276,0.00079500023,0.0003048578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768002,0.015565293,0.0036671143,0.00040851114,0.0030218328,0.00053694035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053179404,0.0002503199,0.00033774992,0.0018900961,0.00082732475,0.002031478,0.0004698728,0.0005779529,0.0026350904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023196882,0.00012098097,0.00068529765,0.0014264997,0.0006335794,0.0016288047,0.00085905247,0.0007554729,0.00037052768],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000537341,0.00035024216,0.82372576,0.00054585177,0.00021933443,0.0006056342,0.06562702,0.00091373053,0.003882762,0.0025168064,0.0034567548,0.09761877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061828,0.00055337785,0.6870719,0.00042430207,0.00031869655,0.0005916801,0.24819262,0.04298108,0.003141504,0.0054169833,0.011140258,0.000105733125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004056911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041505694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053179404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00139582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086979824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028124273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236249676","doi":"10.1108/ajim-03-2020-0089","title":"Investigating academic library responses to predatory publishing in the United States, Canada and Spanish-speaking Latin America","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Latin Americans; Library science; Scholarly communication; Sample (material); Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.29358727861521944,"score_gpt":0.43077296768260404,"score_spread":0.1371856890673846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236249676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9416841,0.00270718,0.000247169,0.0062369616,0.00008917844,0.00009905952,0.00052791124,0.0000519838,0.04835644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902727,0.0021158345,0.00018415756,0.0020904534,0.000037979327,0.00005136261,0.0002329211,0.00003049848,0.004984068],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99242145,0.0020655163,0.00042402121,0.00048648476,0.002738231,0.0018643646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9477181,0.01357542,0.010356341,0.0012242103,0.020670878,0.006454978],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069064475,0.00026249047,0.00048310895,0.0062130666,0.011095403,0.009871934,0.001268394,0.001060361,0.006590465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0414629,0.0002666095,0.00027557663,0.016987516,0.00467614,0.0028711818,0.0049909996,0.0009635271,0.00054067135],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034220112,0.00013125999,0.4148209,0.0012447794,0.000084581254,0.00207335,0.4816061,0.0002116894,0.0012636117,0.00580146,0.017834347,0.07458577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010306135,0.000030957868,0.17440592,0.0003952905,0.00003079597,0.00020749382,0.78135085,0.000106599546,0.00037965336,0.00033034768,0.042690307,0.000061469924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81433064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8694146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99893963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03455097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048281394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37352556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292405002","doi":"10.1108/ajim-01-2017-0014","title":"Publish or impoverish","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":255,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; China; Cash; Originality; Bibliometrics; Value (mathematics); Web of science; Business; Library science; Economics; Marketing; Regional science; Geography; Political science; Social science; Advertising; Sociology; Finance; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.5056988741162761,"score_gpt":0.5706104721088965,"score_spread":0.06491159799262036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292405002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28638467,0.024658946,0.011523104,0.04994195,0.017475521,0.00094325497,0.0070226165,0.0030882796,0.59896165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86156034,0.009176063,0.004076477,0.009976023,0.009271504,0.0003463,0.0019360173,0.00048517168,0.10317207],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98672026,0.0026783838,0.0014066501,0.0012523731,0.006208296,0.0017339927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91733396,0.019474123,0.018418403,0.020199608,0.013068927,0.011505099],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011509815,0.00038495462,0.0007226088,0.00376883,0.0021916702,0.009337708,0.0015372745,0.0010053795,0.045460086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058277093,0.00026297645,0.00059941015,0.006018339,0.0027158675,0.0044848747,0.0036714463,0.0011650127,0.019913143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053678796,0.00022242614,0.0818117,0.002265428,0.00030955632,0.0019291501,0.0032310358,0.0005449407,0.00558491,0.05998506,0.15467939,0.68889964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083706844,0.0003920456,0.0734239,0.00082811515,0.00019062901,0.0018345147,0.0031286676,0.0012298578,0.005191821,0.024429156,0.88914156,0.00012606503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017534774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018893542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021842094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007895461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1520791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293064639","doi":"10.1108/ajim-09-2013-0081","title":"Astrophysicists on Twitter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"Social Media in Health Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Citation; Citation impact; Outreach; Scholarly communication; Social media; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Scientometrics; Citation analysis; Microblogging; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Political science; Publishing","score_opus":0.03743853746220539,"score_gpt":0.3483398900656561,"score_spread":0.3109013526034507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293064639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7397081,0.0040205303,0.007095131,0.015636614,0.0010136807,0.00063350186,0.036796056,0.0016966376,0.1933997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9200084,0.00294716,0.0065308507,0.0034135852,0.0010481138,0.0006280278,0.015412926,0.00036936224,0.049641527],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985672,0.0003908806,0.00011923982,0.00022127572,0.00051286386,0.00018845576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99246174,0.0031608462,0.002021281,0.00057681324,0.0010016946,0.00077759515],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001013769,0.00037839919,0.00042286608,0.0035247598,0.001396681,0.0025636994,0.0004929789,0.0006833275,0.022572659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009756588,0.00024239202,0.00037091642,0.0053336266,0.0003635965,0.0025021643,0.0020944173,0.000602963,0.011092243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006201907,0.00012398079,0.54056334,0.0014948926,0.00018874997,0.0015215373,0.018270824,0.00081143784,0.0063435677,0.006329801,0.13365014,0.2900815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043861703,0.00018567654,0.46424046,0.00061694405,0.00012776948,0.0013826202,0.02165658,0.0047188005,0.002391241,0.005236059,0.4992687,0.00013131152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003107553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044170427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065552606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000617952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075513065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116917707","doi":"10.1108/ajim-04-2025-0241","title":"LLM-based stemming for improved Gujarati information retrieval","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Gujarati; Relevance (law); Preprocessor; Ranking (information retrieval); Precision and recall; Recall; Language model; Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.009732121916617402,"score_gpt":0.26248406416615483,"score_spread":0.25275194224953745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116917707","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2591307,0.0061240587,0.67462385,0.0024984803,0.0004897904,0.0013333573,0.0045682904,0.029502844,0.021728644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41283065,0.001331041,0.57052445,0.0006435629,0.00011739559,0.00043196013,0.007255144,0.00088635844,0.0059793745],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.998519,0.00043715697,0.00019804903,0.00034310145,0.00040436964,0.00009827495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839133,0.00042137448,0.00018731192,0.00023084758,0.0007201295,0.000048881317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013448566,0.0007586451,0.0009729238,0.0035559947,0.0010884865,0.0019179253,0.001162173,0.0006138594,0.002808247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053953375,0.00028054672,0.0010997484,0.003179396,0.0005319007,0.0020321636,0.0014932937,0.0006792917,0.0031516624],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036495968,0.00019317813,0.009284035,0.0021260732,0.00017255396,0.0007083998,0.0022981167,0.013820013,0.07527092,0.011646877,0.021580689,0.8625343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021802995,0.0009878059,0.030168297,0.00049001473,0.0006526626,0.003463853,0.0034461822,0.623449,0.122314416,0.026006864,0.18835607,0.00044669738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013378429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020215785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013378429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013977655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027342218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026601136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}