{"meta":{"query_hash":"3be08ccc75e3","filters":{"venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice"},"cohort_total":30,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":30,"exported":30,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3be08ccc75e3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Assessment+in+Education+Principles+Policy+and+Practice"},"results":[{"id":"W1978227392","doi":"10.1080/09695940903565362","title":"Teacher beliefs about the cognitive diagnostic information of classroom‐ versus large‐scale tests: implications for assessment literacy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Smiths Detection (Canada); University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Mathematics education; Scale (ratio); Psychology; Literacy; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.05055241862711323,"score_gpt":0.48032179247732004,"score_spread":0.4297693738502068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978227392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5479867,0.0002252819,0.0029292104,0.13558571,0.0021999879,0.004179873,0.00020594547,0.00008172852,0.3066056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870275,0.0009119121,0.008294825,0.0012657661,0.00073431357,0.0010304033,0.00016990969,0.000011854519,0.0005534856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816674,0.000408867,0.00052377436,0.00021660984,0.00033671284,0.00034729743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828265,0.015529485,0.0006018049,0.00027129258,0.0006609694,0.00011000382],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027666062,0.00015615515,0.00016991807,0.00020733166,0.0006982924,0.00033642448,0.00030344652,0.00013199972,0.00006552644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011352784,0.00013744291,0.000057922847,0.0005444637,0.00020565982,0.0023316594,0.00009863017,0.00044524262,0.000006438774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008061616,0.0013515892,0.1726081,0.00004318819,0.00006532221,5.765668e-8,0.05189255,0.000003925003,0.00007360176,0.7408808,0.0008353708,0.032164864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082891027,0.000075227545,0.6145263,0.000035050558,0.000082542734,0.000001276393,0.058297753,0.000048117894,0.0000042124298,0.0024003126,0.32356888,0.00013145478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015376091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002459566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7384805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021921612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028076798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996435010","doi":"10.1080/09695940701272773","title":"Did we take the same test? Differing accounts of the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test by first and second language test‐takers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Graduation (instrument); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Construct (python library); Literacy; Construct validity; Mathematics education; Fidelity; Test score; Standardized test; Pedagogy; Developmental psychology; Computer science; Psychometrics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02100229501179931,"score_gpt":0.38458132868967815,"score_spread":0.36357903367787886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996435010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8785336,0.000717962,0.000005737945,0.034860212,0.00031700765,0.00059514266,0.000033167224,0.000018015502,0.08491918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832307,0.0009199142,0.000621495,0.0022710848,0.00033128657,0.000041993328,0.000010528142,0.0000138339165,0.012559129],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983174,0.00020501834,0.00041820566,0.00028080062,0.00042656527,0.00035197084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98928136,0.009708045,0.00045431653,0.00031190016,0.00011228265,0.00013211933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023889581,0.00017869049,0.00017318923,0.00010971424,0.00065773784,0.00038412272,0.0003783061,0.00009920697,0.00032712225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004567929,0.0001313146,0.000039379753,0.0004546433,0.00025203513,0.0011842834,0.00017918301,0.00057698775,0.000004157873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001662022,0.0006631211,0.8745536,0.000048685935,0.000027200562,9.822992e-7,0.11140535,5.882509e-7,0.00062398415,0.0032286532,0.0015691731,0.007861994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023520064,0.000034070967,0.6397342,0.00005857932,0.000026704723,0.000005609869,0.047297895,0.0000037640793,0.000049076192,0.00022760947,0.3122129,0.00011435258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04493859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.113942124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31064373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005247691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020187004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96142125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013464569","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2013.776943","title":"Fair and equitable assessment practices for all students","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University; University of Lethbridge; University of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Intrusiveness; Equity (law); Psychology; Public relations; Best practice; Medical education; Applied psychology; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.10231687439942877,"score_gpt":0.5279200270248844,"score_spread":0.4256031526254556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013464569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46493626,0.0006306556,0.0005220761,0.13636775,0.0010223944,0.004128053,0.000010650142,0.000100410936,0.39228174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94570065,0.004114734,0.03419917,0.0039670034,0.0007121699,0.001296294,0.000034549594,0.000024730723,0.009950678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997134,0.00069686555,0.00044538258,0.00046513675,0.000657997,0.0006006595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99436396,0.004074993,0.00076985866,0.00023613211,0.00031386153,0.0002411873],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004179651,0.0002085413,0.00023710544,0.0002521336,0.00064258976,0.0011841076,0.0003592938,0.00013295797,0.00014068041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031734009,0.00021186711,0.000036221198,0.00034648326,0.00015327988,0.0034884426,0.00026249912,0.0002812839,0.000014772481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042749958,0.0018428091,0.22291036,0.00009676772,0.0001433305,8.5242425e-7,0.018040108,0.000005288103,0.00023544098,0.7311828,0.0038199974,0.021679504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006782885,0.00012184947,0.2919045,0.000035385823,0.00008289351,0.000004646491,0.08186039,0.00009393153,0.0000036730048,0.007085557,0.6178655,0.00026338428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019623796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012149833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72409725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046339657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021814776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013643140","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2014.953910","title":"The effects of key demographic variables on markers’ perceived ease of use and acceptance of onscreen marking","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"AGE-WELL","keywords":"Rasch model; Psychology; Usability; Developmental psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03750763857916641,"score_gpt":0.39032217685889037,"score_spread":0.352814538279724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013643140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97847956,0.00023331035,0.00008732251,0.0023567749,0.000118986034,0.0003117999,0.0000018853847,0.0000059797403,0.0184044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951404,0.0014798166,0.002756436,0.0002784964,0.00003107584,0.00005235493,0.0000046124196,0.000008210149,0.00024860952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978947,0.0013599723,0.00033955186,0.00014541108,0.0001305566,0.00012982052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98753834,0.011402065,0.0004554301,0.00046481987,0.00009532398,0.000043998592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017290429,0.00009062927,0.00014919843,0.00017205755,0.00008981428,0.00003021338,0.00015964487,0.00006218397,0.000008683852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036318933,0.000076747616,0.000023353716,0.00023733918,0.00012828194,0.0002629668,0.00006605095,0.00016749583,3.7993686e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000555491,0.0013026987,0.36736223,0.0002754367,0.00013187372,1.9297944e-7,0.00716,0.000008839377,0.002570871,0.56060547,0.000117419804,0.059909504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039358367,0.00026132408,0.9839348,0.00018031267,0.000046615216,0.000004074625,0.0023041775,0.000093541035,0.000063633415,0.0010538391,0.01159811,0.00006597199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022036259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006980289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61657256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000280134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019001921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4347978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026041656","doi":"10.1080/09695940802164226","title":"Educational assessment in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Brock University","keywords":"Accountability; Independence (probability theory); Bureaucracy; Political science; Scale (ratio); Public administration; Multiculturalism; Educational assessment; Regional science; Economic growth; Geography; Sociology; Pedagogy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.1406251533691962,"score_gpt":0.4873947963953773,"score_spread":0.3467696430261811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026041656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70961785,0.00020438395,0.00009488407,0.16282995,0.0012056478,0.00052858033,0.000014982249,0.000008729876,0.12549496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741686,0.0005398653,0.012234685,0.006482939,0.0004153137,0.0003016885,0.000054488348,0.000014591507,0.0057878336],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952347,0.0008067368,0.0012202141,0.0006697995,0.0016347299,0.00043376326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899126,0.00821395,0.0006158214,0.00055014587,0.00046940663,0.00023805468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034516605,0.00024206465,0.00030795173,0.0007748446,0.0002619664,0.00018749302,0.0005265267,0.00006428916,0.0005262162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055431775,0.0002249535,0.000039593026,0.0014731948,0.00008588162,0.0016523496,0.0001753748,0.0005170541,0.00002473625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021750966,0.0012746438,0.6957066,0.000011344967,0.000015651638,0.0000043907985,0.0012614356,0.00024668875,0.00007357115,0.2831981,0.006912924,0.011272887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032326765,0.00003405358,0.7957795,0.000020293131,0.0000058959013,0.000066606546,0.011540439,0.00043762708,0.000009466598,0.013910341,0.17766386,0.00020864952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.701249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5307347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26928777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034009703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07757267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92765665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068327470","doi":"10.1080/09695940802164218","title":"Self‐assessment in a technology‐supported environment: the case of grade 9 geography","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Gender and Technology in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Self-efficacy; Psychology; Variance (accounting); Self-assessment; Perception; Outcome (game theory); Treatment and control groups; Applied psychology; Medical education; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Medicine; Statistics; Mathematics; Accounting","score_opus":0.040487345031156426,"score_gpt":0.4035206507773588,"score_spread":0.3630333057462024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068327470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8857482,0.00037650522,0.00006154575,0.07181407,0.00017455593,0.00067095354,0.0000036526933,0.00005388661,0.041096628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98322386,0.005353674,0.01055216,0.0003993922,0.00007317126,0.0002664578,0.000007982574,0.000008227792,0.000115074115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982151,0.0005992239,0.00040912948,0.00027564127,0.0002021645,0.00029873292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832296,0.00085464853,0.00033802414,0.0003573967,0.000066370216,0.000060611306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016907947,0.0001266053,0.00015337183,0.0007608384,0.00045799234,0.000025260717,0.0002442335,0.00018776479,0.00003292887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005278469,0.00011674784,0.00003069733,0.0011901582,0.00053407793,0.00042941383,0.00007870288,0.0004983845,0.000002710742],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006900367,0.0021958216,0.28332138,0.00002336054,0.0000395945,0.000036290632,0.029288026,0.000018127517,0.000043865286,0.67667353,0.00006825667,0.008284866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059179554,0.000107330845,0.49484614,0.00002797386,0.00007574538,0.0011018933,0.27512556,0.00009959443,0.00008241062,0.044524614,0.18312998,0.00028699235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008589511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009472634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6321489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036376514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027604096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99801236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072764341","doi":"10.1080/09695940600563611","title":"Differential effects of global modifications to large‐scale high stakes examination programmes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Accountability; Scale (ratio); Session (web analytics); Test (biology); Empirical examination; Identification (biology); Psychology; Political science; Medical education; Medicine; Geography; Law; Actuarial science; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.02697556704776101,"score_gpt":0.41688929703418975,"score_spread":0.38991372998642876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072764341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93778855,0.00007474767,0.001558819,0.009446842,0.0004132239,0.0009260873,0.000014085041,0.00003851156,0.049739163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99101067,0.00016077931,0.0068469616,0.00018745658,0.00041420077,0.00023712772,0.000045600886,0.0000071800223,0.0010900258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810547,0.0005899787,0.00032745255,0.00025284855,0.0004319766,0.0002922973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983203,0.0009493798,0.00025614194,0.00017305266,0.0002073121,0.00009383414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069051975,0.00012107696,0.00015424505,0.00014730224,0.00027527352,0.00016482784,0.00017684186,0.000082202125,0.00002681152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008336612,0.00012863577,0.00002934244,0.00074675056,0.0000848611,0.0006062538,0.000060173552,0.00010031758,0.0000049923005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017679837,0.0020340139,0.09850462,0.000045637622,0.00001593483,3.0290556e-7,0.008124891,0.00001722241,0.00023895009,0.88168,0.0002097574,0.009110951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003659113,0.00006621101,0.93498874,0.000034015,0.00004658782,6.742089e-7,0.022149252,0.000025278314,0.00009678698,0.0034506163,0.038635366,0.00014054397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015155035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054862374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87822944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040176732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010689064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124002552","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2014.967168","title":"Instructional Rounds as a professional learning model for systemic implementation of Assessment for Learning","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Professional learning community; Professional development; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Session (web analytics); Medical education; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.058823989514014775,"score_gpt":0.5102705274787012,"score_spread":0.45144653796468637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124002552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8478959,0.000088223525,0.079190165,0.027419664,0.0011104749,0.0036470625,0.000013310967,0.00008674652,0.040548436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94067025,0.00021685647,0.05342697,0.0003297179,0.00051114656,0.00091015943,0.00010890542,0.000017600063,0.0038084134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767625,0.00071777235,0.00052082975,0.00030212672,0.0004740259,0.0003090028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99580187,0.002863585,0.000699274,0.00009800112,0.00044778275,0.00008950686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041866186,0.00014401037,0.00021396183,0.0002625659,0.0007346452,0.00013733192,0.00015406361,0.0001069032,0.000028311784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016890072,0.00015494187,0.00006198201,0.0002695712,0.000083227766,0.0009538442,0.000051127678,0.00025935276,8.886276e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007823219,0.0002797426,0.038071327,0.00013742181,0.00004448113,4.5828713e-8,0.0138212405,0.0024591088,0.00033124513,0.9211442,0.00009349727,0.023539452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040968116,0.0007755842,0.09652027,0.0002966867,0.00023874137,0.000030985804,0.4364676,0.090975374,0.0000478515,0.037741594,0.3321038,0.0007047071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015073032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028104422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8834026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052311056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047072973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83505434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287186680","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2015.1113929","title":"Brazilian national assessment data and educational policy: an empirical illustration","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Portuguese; Sample (material); Census; Latin Americans; Student achievement; Mathematics education; Geography; Developing country; Contrast (vision); Academic achievement; Political science; Psychology; Economic growth; Demography; Sociology; Population; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.23858880022483428,"score_gpt":0.5617100844317808,"score_spread":0.3231212842069465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287186680","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.250799,0.00023867133,0.00016594688,0.4483012,0.0006105926,0.00050588953,0.00005721628,0.000044254804,0.29927725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663535,0.0010426576,0.017805878,0.007729989,0.004515756,0.000082426486,0.00048069263,0.000012700157,0.0019764164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739784,0.0008473707,0.00033720225,0.00041594435,0.00073121145,0.00027044793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974141,0.0012147672,0.00023063451,0.00032379208,0.00043076172,0.00038593027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004557081,0.00013422931,0.00012232168,0.0003265335,0.000439066,0.00041932694,0.00033238146,0.00011940829,0.000050181283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058573876,0.00014356569,0.0000106872285,0.000597571,0.00018391211,0.0046145744,0.00013672507,0.00031255317,0.000010172629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004109521,0.0010238513,0.19494988,0.000023750552,0.00002140125,4.3063875e-7,0.016196681,0.000070001544,0.000013862248,0.7627886,0.007822538,0.01704791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027688756,0.000054933123,0.33373883,0.000016216267,0.00001374189,0.00001926576,0.017980348,0.0010398828,7.972032e-7,0.017406618,0.6292892,0.00016328608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010921218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006376652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74538195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007738037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029005304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99566513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317555153","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2013.844094","title":"Students’ interpersonal trust and attitudes towards standardised tests: exploring affective variables related to student assessment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Communication in Education and Healthcare","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Test (biology); Expectancy theory; Scale (ratio); Value (mathematics); Structural equation modeling; Interpersonal relationship; Computer science","score_opus":0.09861461347341459,"score_gpt":0.526713327331136,"score_spread":0.42809871385772136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317555153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8730057,0.000455146,0.00013410725,0.04579162,0.0010262638,0.0016014271,0.000015327574,0.000067599765,0.07790283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97921264,0.0010195223,0.011202236,0.0032467633,0.00016053143,0.0031413792,0.000035534023,0.00003071424,0.0019506643],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680114,0.0011700243,0.00065016164,0.0005532033,0.00045296372,0.0003724926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99644655,0.0019100845,0.00032200033,0.0006074894,0.00038027752,0.00033362437],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001913421,0.0002579703,0.00029262478,0.0004973558,0.00031874914,0.0004184005,0.00037734365,0.000113555456,0.00090133667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000871012,0.00026475216,0.00003409221,0.0005572312,0.000090009795,0.0009684197,0.00036680073,0.0005957325,0.000046204666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060221657,0.0028859917,0.57948494,0.00007721096,0.00019762681,0.0000012033247,0.062799,0.000015763819,0.000068839094,0.287419,0.0006434015,0.06634681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061096216,0.0001838622,0.84215325,0.00011677053,0.000033459826,0.000029337878,0.105346195,0.000014816201,0.000002065541,0.00075816835,0.050529025,0.00022208282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055536493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002055444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28666082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001068321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00155269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600733185","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2017.1297010","title":"Developing assessment capable teachers in this age of accountability","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Psychology; Medical education; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.12258459740226811,"score_gpt":0.5148076355503635,"score_spread":0.39222303814809534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600733185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51093733,0.000066206274,0.000067570625,0.021986337,0.00038390333,0.00048762502,0.000002447362,0.0000147035,0.46605387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771204,0.0013645903,0.018533807,0.0004878001,0.00021069136,0.000103527345,0.000012399338,0.000010207601,0.0021566076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757373,0.00073537685,0.00049928593,0.00033454315,0.00049624534,0.0003608429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732774,0.0013517789,0.000623671,0.0004520884,0.00015483775,0.00008987364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054570246,0.00015117052,0.00025988888,0.00025102822,0.0006227701,0.0003924616,0.000512693,0.00012797126,0.0001255186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003231292,0.00016249882,0.00003586689,0.00028708766,0.00031588157,0.0020273414,0.00020188901,0.0003605561,0.0000038865965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001524136,0.00051975343,0.5562643,0.000033390053,0.000018636298,0.0000015851964,0.029716179,0.000005175718,0.00009025372,0.4065339,0.000073007046,0.0067285793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034756982,0.000019983006,0.7810145,0.00007257796,0.000016582175,0.0000010205812,0.054676525,0.000014785074,0.000011315349,0.003633609,0.1600303,0.00016124127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09320701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018439839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46618304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012492697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057436004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923740196","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2019.1593105","title":"Conceptualising fairness in classroom assessment: exploring the value of organisational justice theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Economic Justice; Scholarship; Value (mathematics); Core (optical fiber); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.07905727411628827,"score_gpt":0.4421515498552321,"score_spread":0.3630942757389438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923740196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76570654,0.00013080242,0.00032807325,0.013752635,0.0010582444,0.0006923455,0.0000037942968,0.000020871556,0.21830669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992701,0.0008593524,0.0037466786,0.0010143329,0.00039764206,0.00010815565,0.000013913601,0.0000148620375,0.0011440843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996267,0.0019421374,0.0005124431,0.00030239008,0.00064990047,0.00032610804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99162704,0.007442335,0.00041942517,0.00025899382,0.00018276172,0.000069440895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005509842,0.00015313391,0.00021529787,0.00026529544,0.00030250798,0.00017681715,0.00035393855,0.00008157531,0.00018143698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019450791,0.00013766268,0.000035910634,0.0008488765,0.00022386565,0.0017424127,0.00013192664,0.00040146185,0.000010186719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028650853,0.00032297347,0.10661192,0.0000401553,0.000020596719,4.1832726e-7,0.037772484,0.00018406726,0.00012307975,0.8522458,0.000021723175,0.002628144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005097623,0.000038422342,0.56339604,0.00009847654,0.000060778664,0.0000028898432,0.37739146,0.00014479014,0.000019613757,0.014906913,0.043244857,0.0001859801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034723678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035615792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83733886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005734127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037322294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6620815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994689616","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2019.1703171","title":"A cross-cultural comparison of German and Canadian student teachers’ assessment competence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); German; Multitude; Psychology; Pedagogy; Cross-cultural; Mathematics education; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.06255569384159228,"score_gpt":0.5279710097896466,"score_spread":0.46541531594805435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994689616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7798889,0.00018024468,0.0000042097245,0.007867324,0.00033490313,0.0005260509,0.0000048428756,0.000013477761,0.21118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930194,0.0006239272,0.0031915335,0.00063304265,0.0001656385,0.000049875394,0.000020295407,0.000009715106,0.0022865431],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977324,0.00056857965,0.00045590193,0.00032931744,0.0005295817,0.00038420194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790406,0.000999268,0.00037500684,0.00021445623,0.00024914026,0.00025807598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019209845,0.00016351284,0.00027425136,0.00026539393,0.0003588272,0.00042215647,0.00027493932,0.00010941075,0.0001577346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040945807,0.00016476444,0.000031550087,0.00038856355,0.00027543277,0.0013656131,0.00011148588,0.0003409048,0.00000925729],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067109077,0.00032141554,0.70120466,0.000017492077,0.000026819622,4.358511e-7,0.053100564,0.00001185364,0.00008801893,0.24243604,0.000058876725,0.0027271034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032288293,0.00006349017,0.7536595,0.0000357557,0.000022937773,0.0000024671633,0.100608565,0.000053427946,0.0000043142704,0.00022270408,0.14485309,0.00015087669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20906894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07102387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24221332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072936056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037651197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9459275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004711011","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2020.1719033","title":"Leveraging assessment to promote kindergarten learners’ independence and self-regulation within play-based classrooms","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Early Childhood Education and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Curriculum; Leverage (statistics); Psychology; Pedagogy; Early childhood education; Independence (probability theory); Assessment for learning; Mathematics education; Formative assessment; Computer science","score_opus":0.048417935656527564,"score_gpt":0.3940303882998441,"score_spread":0.3456124526433165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004711011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6063907,0.000065130094,0.0026800544,0.34050673,0.00044992275,0.0012357492,0.0000025962624,0.00014075634,0.048528325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.919952,0.00011155508,0.0657199,0.013392839,0.00033532784,0.00009201931,0.000017482365,0.000015432628,0.0003634629],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974984,0.0006865133,0.00040970862,0.00047819875,0.00061414205,0.00031304962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998294,0.0006177668,0.00030108562,0.00016440992,0.00018422981,0.0004385073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022442706,0.00017553623,0.00016852941,0.00024411865,0.00049824716,0.0004164467,0.00017037986,0.00012030354,0.00007749653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017562518,0.00019295035,0.000019879753,0.00070844457,0.00006332792,0.00097587117,0.00008312597,0.00041037417,0.000014044139],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007988549,0.0011882994,0.11195495,0.00010124789,0.000075434684,0.0000031216225,0.51138026,0.0025493565,0.0003049073,0.34077206,0.0005888059,0.031001663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005804726,0.00016195119,0.591415,0.00008844674,0.000037650745,0.000006814143,0.085659295,0.0018055802,0.000038680417,0.0017142978,0.31807622,0.00041559996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026377358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039983576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47946003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005630148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0100702625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007758995","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2020.1728908","title":"Making feedback effective?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.09632089257636077,"score_gpt":0.48106678362533445,"score_spread":0.38474589104897366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007758995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09940084,0.0002971933,0.00023836129,0.18457705,0.00045647993,0.00089042337,0.0000024360143,0.000082760525,0.71405447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820929,0.0008390172,0.005939774,0.009044613,0.0011356892,0.00010994612,0.0000060195507,0.000012683436,0.00081933633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796116,0.0008207741,0.00025181184,0.00030110587,0.00036665544,0.0002984733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975784,0.0018289322,0.00020575333,0.0001205467,0.00010527877,0.00016110571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013813736,0.0001292173,0.00015257276,0.00012515746,0.0003563722,0.0002650739,0.00021091421,0.00008271297,0.00012900172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033280377,0.00014012739,0.00003207194,0.0006660628,0.00011227092,0.0010607846,0.00010635194,0.00028389457,0.000042399588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070431364,0.0003948126,0.07271353,0.00004265333,0.000035710327,0.0000026964512,0.055828623,0.000017489689,0.00010872761,0.82709616,0.0010513654,0.042637803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029577521,0.000053673815,0.19240287,0.000031112144,0.000025821788,0.0000024928336,0.05439495,0.000061028935,0.0000055702662,0.0012172764,0.7513362,0.00017319253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015768154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025005863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8826921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000298837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015805203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57142293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081330604","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2020.1801576","title":"Collaborating with teachers to design and implement assessments for self-regulated learning in the context of authentic classroom writing tasks","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Task (project management); Mathematics education; Psychology; Self-regulated learning; Quality (philosophy); Pedagogy; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.10441676341013247,"score_gpt":0.49469630880821713,"score_spread":0.3902795453980847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081330604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91822076,0.000079581005,0.04620251,0.030529967,0.00007935795,0.0015531557,0.0000043585655,0.00003769673,0.0032926314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85905516,0.00000734075,0.13787572,0.002583579,0.000078577286,0.00028321016,0.000012685571,0.00001808044,0.00008564818],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994503,0.0042387447,0.00048225783,0.00033081693,0.00017782765,0.00026735218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937207,0.0054342123,0.00047414826,0.00014255072,0.00016480648,0.000063574735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077572903,0.00015494517,0.00022034,0.00019981855,0.00018966888,0.000102085534,0.00012737823,0.00006522617,0.000010083457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002607319,0.00012842547,0.0000132001915,0.00077229616,0.000032140095,0.0002180214,0.000041967476,0.0005504377,6.578499e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085416343,0.0009990353,0.13327682,0.00018469663,0.0002559451,0.0000036103804,0.5294727,0.0011965656,0.0017264026,0.20171663,0.000331353,0.12998207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026861995,0.0025355092,0.27337745,0.00019998275,0.00014261987,0.000037125854,0.61375034,0.00406005,0.00009729156,0.00030750482,0.102420226,0.00038574825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063747395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037393114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20140912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013749524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075985835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5237039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167522218","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2021.1932736","title":"Conceptualising a Fairness Framework for Assessment Adjusted Practices for Students with Disability: An Empirical Study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Disability Education and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Psychology; Diversity (politics); Best practice; Pedagogy; Medical education; Mathematics education; Applied psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.24808421599986105,"score_gpt":0.6006909723976173,"score_spread":0.3526067563977562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167522218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8838512,0.0000578593,0.004800655,0.099364616,0.0006794684,0.0037194886,0.000023244389,0.00006105169,0.0074424646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9204622,0.00008302528,0.07268649,0.0029917427,0.0006537442,0.0022124762,0.000095807525,0.000024549261,0.0007899427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525005,0.002324725,0.00054803805,0.0007218317,0.0007252398,0.00043010188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98790175,0.009868606,0.00067999755,0.0004999327,0.00076028216,0.00028945395],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051749856,0.0002110255,0.00030155428,0.00009106433,0.00077214674,0.0008668912,0.0003041171,0.00013000524,0.000068739784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015427033,0.00020569,0.0000477437,0.00065000117,0.00029316495,0.0018419432,0.00008882834,0.0002930177,9.786309e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021674014,0.018789252,0.5453664,0.000092055765,0.000097632634,7.0025396e-7,0.09996181,0.000031712083,0.0000038160524,0.3237733,0.00009103559,0.011575553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007656207,0.00041518194,0.25248197,0.0000497883,0.00013405952,0.0000037638797,0.5556222,0.00004216296,0.0000032392256,0.0057480857,0.18451762,0.00021628563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006081443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012203454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45566043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010477517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008320802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185953117","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2021.1951161","title":"Assessing young children’s self-regulation in school contexts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Self-regulated learning; Psychology; Curriculum; Developmental psychology; Situated; Self-control; Pedagogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05781325932187747,"score_gpt":0.4946531875119819,"score_spread":0.4368399281901044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185953117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7834067,0.00038840686,0.0021106387,0.0090642935,0.0007205586,0.00023917454,0.0000014115006,0.000058729118,0.20401011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518818,0.00006486766,0.043432463,0.0018591969,0.00039283177,0.00007953762,0.000057837417,0.000020430265,0.0022110343],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99414605,0.004500447,0.00047043222,0.00041908075,0.00018064324,0.00028336656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972718,0.001808543,0.00034428193,0.00031496835,0.00018772649,0.000072692164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045705778,0.00015841605,0.00019273993,0.00041606542,0.00015942662,0.0002548417,0.000094704796,0.00013750717,0.00030674684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004860867,0.00017756232,0.000024241097,0.0008000803,0.00003419783,0.00102426,0.00005676802,0.000850583,0.000024135781],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032085667,0.0013223428,0.5745565,0.000021604597,0.000060846935,0.000007504694,0.010776494,0.00006389436,0.0005126239,0.3619324,0.0001950608,0.050518617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005607689,0.000024078152,0.9618236,0.00006742032,0.00002147845,0.00021431361,0.008784736,0.00006716204,0.00003230603,0.0015866663,0.026641138,0.00017633446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023960485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000114209346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38726708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004623732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001845835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7240782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210068963","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2021.1988510","title":"Formative assessment, growth mindset, and achievement: examining their relations in the East and the West","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Formative assessment; Psychology; Reading (process); Mainland China; Academic achievement; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; China; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.07796939436320567,"score_gpt":0.42193192942447144,"score_spread":0.3439625350612658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210068963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51677626,0.00065425487,0.00011644991,0.16626662,0.00021188702,0.00076819584,0.000008700095,0.000015016951,0.3151826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99040806,0.003560904,0.0019259823,0.0028958663,0.00021405215,0.00019888469,0.00002652764,0.000008007668,0.00076170365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643284,0.0022921714,0.0003665297,0.00027048984,0.00035883792,0.00027910524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934272,0.0058898195,0.00029142798,0.00019223773,0.00013139687,0.00006790744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004968341,0.0001533237,0.0001754987,0.00015254256,0.0008857095,0.00057652243,0.00020252728,0.000075328884,0.00003403229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016985696,0.000106408115,0.000021660237,0.0007078957,0.00036852385,0.0014114715,0.00016335557,0.00045077046,0.0000019566064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018804996,0.00029174722,0.12295666,0.000013066437,0.000028740207,0.0000012137617,0.16448733,0.0000019629288,0.000008965343,0.70885235,0.00009091223,0.003248253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069542165,0.000022938051,0.55200946,0.00003515187,0.000035019937,0.000012976049,0.40428564,0.00007671639,0.0000010663888,0.0060067377,0.0367156,0.000103260805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027644853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037524144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7028456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017798628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014827205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68122506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205974171","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2021.1999209","title":"Investigating the potential of NLP-driven linguistic and acoustic features for predicting human scores of children’s oral language proficiency","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Storytelling; Vocabulary; Grammar; Literacy; Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Narrative; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.030720207226523362,"score_gpt":0.42304993140413255,"score_spread":0.3923297241776092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205974171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926202,0.00072718866,0.00017227793,0.0015727829,0.00024109297,0.00036473246,0.000018210252,0.000009497217,0.0042739906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98929864,0.0000453277,0.009508324,0.00027907538,0.00020134189,0.000083352,0.00005214135,0.000010027968,0.00052177615],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988071,0.00031898858,0.00036929786,0.00021784476,0.00013114604,0.00015563336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801785,0.0011940547,0.0004003185,0.00018184296,0.00016375205,0.000042211792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080704654,0.00009726204,0.00014847443,0.00011250018,0.00015018343,0.00005010625,0.00009298134,0.00005176008,0.000010081494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034513266,0.00008042021,0.000021654918,0.00018559341,0.00010210391,0.00010869075,0.0000652289,0.0001812937,1.5981517e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000686478,0.0013466707,0.5339083,0.00059913396,0.00025951822,0.0000043392906,0.14606768,0.0004407376,0.018411156,0.27747408,0.0002204195,0.021199329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040711268,0.00009694669,0.9744487,0.000178791,0.00010002475,0.000113426744,0.022467375,0.00021544851,0.0004799497,0.0009406016,0.00044649484,0.000105119165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001498436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000074336676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4405404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003659694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006446757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41318098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286809449","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2022.2103516","title":"The Education and Assessment System in Lithuania","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Higher Education Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Accountability; Political science; Curriculum; Bologna declaration; Politics; Test (biology); Public administration; Independence (probability theory); Function (biology); European union; Educational assessment; Pedagogy; Public relations; Higher education; Sociology; Business; Law","score_opus":0.04449651455830835,"score_gpt":0.47242111135392556,"score_spread":0.42792459679561723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286809449","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38712716,0.0017898979,0.000017892064,0.21020241,0.0021588635,0.0009949125,0.0000037500865,0.00005961684,0.3976455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851447,0.0017109985,0.0039735087,0.0014463717,0.0003865814,0.0009178057,0.000012936391,0.0000140249595,0.0063931057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99438775,0.0040569464,0.00041034634,0.0003295867,0.00051134673,0.00030400386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99378026,0.0051888507,0.00050046016,0.0002664685,0.00013771915,0.00012627452],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007828544,0.000121066085,0.00012471099,0.00025298953,0.0018197722,0.00049651536,0.00026329525,0.00005274185,0.000052691834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028149828,0.000120216275,0.000016038135,0.00088525465,0.00014202252,0.0011610001,0.00015656298,0.00071417814,0.00000471344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018716191,0.0006709625,0.054338988,0.000027582793,0.000010148147,6.0398014e-7,0.037726175,0.000054671753,0.0000062959216,0.8665367,0.0004384636,0.040170733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090589805,0.000023718887,0.14826982,0.000016922462,0.000010515999,0.000018984518,0.23997894,0.000051531326,2.3961343e-7,0.0006869495,0.6107686,0.000083146864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02601653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022901406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86584973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018763613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01389293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322503168","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2023.2182737","title":"Data literacy assessments: a systematic literature review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Literacy; Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Information literacy; Field (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Systematic review; Psychology; Medical education; Data science; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Political science; Medicine; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.25638355098970766,"score_gpt":0.588095050840592,"score_spread":0.33171149985088433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322503168","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03455831,0.123580225,0.0016496305,0.63380456,0.007024258,0.01093865,0.0007978038,0.00050042215,0.18714613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27666235,0.4786966,0.06798269,0.09411259,0.0028584136,0.003702938,0.005563969,0.00014472703,0.070275724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932129,0.0019776286,0.0016507775,0.0009884859,0.0017482992,0.00042193176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98398757,0.01162622,0.00110246,0.0021563056,0.00090868375,0.00021875078],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016936453,0.00028796063,0.0005319071,0.001112119,0.00023463108,0.0014165778,0.0014945479,0.00009092638,0.00018020763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027073968,0.00022448122,0.000060925566,0.0048196698,0.00005403433,0.005758511,0.00084815687,0.0004486456,0.00024167263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006922458,0.0036805903,0.014599024,0.04968821,0.00028245122,0.000038505827,0.0055486085,0.000032329954,0.00015816547,0.6062237,0.17425185,0.14542736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004375722,0.00012430952,0.043242197,0.029008495,0.00016670671,0.0001674075,0.011201496,0.004123088,0.0000032512519,0.020327719,0.8906622,0.0005355408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008937122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025005176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7164104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002923018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031663761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385416815","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2023.2242004","title":"Educational assessment in Ghana: The influence of historical colonization and political accountability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Summative assessment; Accountability; Context (archaeology); Politics; Political science; Educational assessment; Government (linguistics); Pedagogy; Sociology; Public administration; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.05672128565655436,"score_gpt":0.46713834296963386,"score_spread":0.4104170573130795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385416815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8525159,0.000063992586,0.0000075991147,0.11386093,0.00017602945,0.00045381385,0.000002222905,0.000015920346,0.0329036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964124,0.00055481546,0.0010142884,0.00083041645,0.00023995875,0.00015742531,0.000016185864,0.000007011174,0.0007675307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976172,0.0008570211,0.00044047425,0.00026892612,0.0004929104,0.00032348375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945495,0.0047159297,0.00023195472,0.00018071197,0.00021729586,0.00010458911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034560594,0.000110588066,0.00016418549,0.00029613698,0.00028385723,0.00011000153,0.00019860156,0.00009351248,0.00002947463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003672015,0.00010117978,0.000020173,0.0012379269,0.00024828862,0.00082463137,0.00012231516,0.00029202702,0.000003204019],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011255331,0.00036091308,0.393255,0.000021231728,0.0000067953038,2.003859e-7,0.0077857953,0.000033155913,0.000017529534,0.5977758,0.00017398155,0.000558323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018809766,0.000028215374,0.91925967,0.000026342443,0.000016339422,0.0000019938914,0.043123953,0.000101031976,0.0000011176586,0.008023916,0.029132405,0.00009692396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024352672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003076569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5897519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015360827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045618047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98214424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386496830","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2023.2255936","title":"Classroom assessment fairness inventory: a new instrument to support perceived fairness in classroom assessment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Saskatchewan; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Grading (engineering); Equity (law); Perception; Legitimacy; Diversity (politics); Pedagogy; Medical education; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.08886918950009094,"score_gpt":0.4589116453380946,"score_spread":0.37004245583800366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386496830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6615182,0.00004463403,0.0005469086,0.1122525,0.002284787,0.0028941017,0.000020113612,0.00028469338,0.22015405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700794,0.0017173869,0.010489179,0.0033379544,0.0010471317,0.000908075,0.00018724645,0.00006838489,0.012165192],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.992456,0.0019430494,0.0012559444,0.0011685333,0.0017919795,0.0013844671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958108,0.0017920613,0.0006003101,0.0006774919,0.00029540906,0.0008239021],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061838585,0.0005577894,0.000667404,0.0017188645,0.00068840757,0.00085684704,0.00087975356,0.00034176512,0.00041278847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014396104,0.0006220013,0.00012699983,0.0036851414,0.00019393934,0.0023422176,0.00059982366,0.0009779381,0.00014395529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098902754,0.0018658825,0.49710014,0.000091964954,0.000099798955,0.000028977383,0.036839876,0.00026171122,0.0002231536,0.42352745,0.0066524013,0.03320973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011724074,0.00021044635,0.59669405,0.00012598922,0.00004972657,0.000005983081,0.09425754,0.0002687263,0.0000032248902,0.0040766248,0.30260876,0.000526513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022421379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013723578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41945085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040853405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016742397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411558571","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2025.2523162","title":"Placing students at the centre: new directions for student agency in assessment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Higher Education Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Mathematics education; Psychology; Medical education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.056306342601075456,"score_gpt":0.535095557930777,"score_spread":0.47878921532970153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411558571","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3738214,0.00065992546,0.00030623178,0.4041684,0.0022702147,0.0019935854,0.0000041479448,0.00005379489,0.21672232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8521536,0.002973292,0.0075357226,0.0039552255,0.00056685496,0.00057848176,0.000022349444,0.00001699057,0.13219751],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966091,0.0017174371,0.00046335254,0.00037576587,0.00047701722,0.00035735287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913493,0.0076947245,0.00038859702,0.00028938413,0.00015978263,0.0001182519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004643497,0.00014469067,0.00015685451,0.000293601,0.00096493895,0.00045883734,0.00037911822,0.00008866454,0.00012906203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005289496,0.00013646205,0.000037049063,0.0010442195,0.000094659816,0.00097244733,0.00016427027,0.0003855267,0.000009993326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042529355,0.0017085735,0.46538952,0.00003393335,0.000067944224,4.9665596e-7,0.08850389,0.0002771229,0.000025047819,0.41851303,0.004662332,0.020775598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026158334,0.000011472591,0.3819346,0.00004169804,0.000033526074,8.4731903e-7,0.039424326,0.000011805412,0.0000024417204,0.0009107744,0.5772885,0.00007840461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018970026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017742015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5726262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020286846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077474075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413304054","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2025.2549158","title":"Diversity: a necessary imperative for assessment research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Data science; Engineering ethics; Management science; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Anthropology","score_opus":0.4676913733950703,"score_gpt":0.6664621529759441,"score_spread":0.19877077958087386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413304054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22293155,0.00035804967,0.010533431,0.25223917,0.0013472149,0.0024241463,0.000029609524,0.000042551437,0.5100943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96007776,0.0006724112,0.018744979,0.006185903,0.00021965067,0.00057324505,0.000027530237,0.0000088703055,0.0134896645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943515,0.0021908216,0.00080408744,0.00067029253,0.0015592295,0.00042406557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763798,0.020397281,0.00035617818,0.0006250004,0.0021038302,0.00013787788],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025257729,0.00017682526,0.0002804151,0.0015561784,0.0018257675,0.0006116584,0.00061385497,0.00011731227,0.0001691306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015674029,0.00015354408,0.000061033326,0.002260363,0.00015798748,0.0020829486,0.0011247696,0.0005452217,0.000016696893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010793987,0.0007498134,0.057627738,0.000034524117,0.000040956114,6.2101964e-7,0.004673721,0.0001712208,0.00007685571,0.8599273,0.0065100286,0.070079304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083220814,0.00016202047,0.2861777,0.000059230195,0.000028008799,0.0000057910656,0.045070346,0.005298485,0.000046074983,0.11255848,0.5495876,0.0001740563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009658303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037814552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7473688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083319243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010208866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415029048","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2025.2573160","title":"The importance of community in assessment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Education Systems and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.08192554165819252,"score_gpt":0.5204617613953847,"score_spread":0.43853621973719215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415029048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44769657,0.0003143824,0.000020801415,0.113660134,0.00038135197,0.0003481757,0.0000021074022,0.00000817893,0.4375683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914171,0.001817054,0.0008361955,0.0026157664,0.00012729382,0.00014243838,0.0000044932744,0.000003837904,0.0030357987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963879,0.0026203075,0.0004818859,0.00010150206,0.0002027489,0.00020568579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931365,0.0059732157,0.0003460287,0.0003268409,0.00016556526,0.000051807983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071672467,0.000078035526,0.0001318999,0.0002284129,0.000575572,0.00011108371,0.00026829026,0.00006698917,0.0000130429635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039992523,0.00006868862,0.000020610481,0.000886704,0.00019347602,0.0004205179,0.00007083978,0.00039846354,0.0000010043985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057150155,0.0003186913,0.19433852,0.000023572737,0.000007398851,4.9513826e-8,0.02033752,0.0000062995937,0.00000747542,0.7787505,0.000446403,0.005757898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009479978,0.000008501678,0.4013827,0.000038063095,0.000004597761,5.879573e-7,0.16025557,0.000005213053,0.000002547483,0.010169163,0.427997,0.000041254832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05381303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024334034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7685813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005095224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007792133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416894890","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2025.2591284","title":"An implementation of argument-based validation for assessing college major preferences with a hybrid of Likert-rating and forced-choice formats","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Data collection; Measure (data warehouse); Key (lock); Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.04844669177838798,"score_gpt":0.4835110550125784,"score_spread":0.4350643632341904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416894890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807323,0.00006987273,0.0032949657,0.004250352,0.00011073368,0.0011923717,0.00002554476,0.000014989774,0.010308842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706818,0.00012551948,0.028502118,0.00024359168,0.00006391154,0.00021321933,0.00006602218,0.000006566947,0.00009725805],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984451,0.00040218025,0.00045382106,0.0002187012,0.00028899734,0.00019123414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965391,0.002300221,0.0006561158,0.00012795611,0.0003228883,0.00005369718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017770339,0.00011608828,0.0001861462,0.00030360027,0.0003287303,0.00016934877,0.00012277483,0.00004658314,0.000011089872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057838147,0.00011249646,0.000019607121,0.00042111013,0.00010287753,0.0019616962,0.000027588305,0.00008201207,5.816528e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002057682,0.00097279815,0.47743312,0.0006083126,0.000109544424,1.704726e-7,0.014045234,0.00010367229,0.0021937191,0.4673372,0.00008502579,0.036905434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033265743,0.00059444696,0.568276,0.0005674294,0.00035218455,0.0000019917004,0.3990984,0.001538567,0.006703575,0.0060767853,0.013078263,0.00038580134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052848696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017280047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4612604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015439543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029677702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7989177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417447051","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2025.2602452","title":"The validity of the assessment for learning measurement instrument for Ethiopian middle school mathematics teachers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Reliability (semiconductor); Test validity; Test (biology)","score_opus":0.596064082416965,"score_gpt":0.5664535415641934,"score_spread":0.029610540852771594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417447051","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28895298,0.00079216197,0.34001386,0.26662776,0.004841681,0.0067486526,0.000024966124,0.000058972902,0.09193895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69831854,0.0003085405,0.29673377,0.0011803183,0.00013808892,0.00067629974,0.00000231742,0.000010619681,0.0026314943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957099,0.0017945943,0.00097567687,0.0003464481,0.0008991339,0.00027424653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.892214,0.10457654,0.0014000052,0.0007401768,0.0009897684,0.000079487836],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038727444,0.00014027888,0.00024411967,0.00028681758,0.00071141095,0.00033017536,0.00066457957,0.000081037884,0.0000060171183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34798747,0.00008251938,0.00010374053,0.0011471267,0.00010683187,0.0003339389,0.00021588035,0.00038026416,4.486896e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049366772,0.0007329295,0.09627533,0.00016061879,0.00010323967,3.339102e-8,0.0021087714,0.0005693522,0.0003483622,0.66519296,0.0017895194,0.23266952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065108866,0.00014174613,0.26266718,0.00017868791,0.0000782771,0.0000034445175,0.047581524,0.0032219568,0.00023170505,0.16073868,0.5243675,0.00013820162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019328117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007542888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.522578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048256415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033231059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9898324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118245466","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2025.2607856","title":"Assessment quality","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice","topic":"Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Quality assessment; Educational assessment; Standards-based assessment; Risk assessment","score_opus":0.09899369132097026,"score_gpt":0.5616235891664735,"score_spread":0.46262989784550324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118245466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19236559,0.00054308283,0.0008745148,0.309757,0.00056238414,0.0008463145,0.0000109208695,0.000056099623,0.49498412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9325048,0.001131605,0.020447299,0.0404893,0.00028424087,0.00013265757,0.00003477881,0.000010245763,0.0049650976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727386,0.0010762439,0.0007672189,0.00037731876,0.00027639666,0.00022895657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99157166,0.0070434497,0.00040226273,0.00049688807,0.00032286285,0.0001628472],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044249357,0.00015398001,0.00034212638,0.0002687155,0.00012526562,0.00011877391,0.000090358306,0.0001260699,0.00008103303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011377843,0.00014529347,0.000054405955,0.00062446104,0.0000696046,0.0006222947,0.000089376575,0.00060798135,0.00000856379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021480626,0.0020431534,0.08875023,0.00017964821,0.00008801065,0.0000027104918,0.00018370418,0.0000047608796,0.00029241326,0.8654642,0.0003656472,0.04241073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008734473,0.00007078849,0.5200362,0.00007683155,0.000096412354,0.000010871662,0.001944038,0.00011699685,0.000008087694,0.0023493906,0.47432718,0.00008971213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014724397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8631148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004046254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067295833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}