{"meta":{"query_hash":"191561bacfe3","filters":{"venue":"Australasian Parliamentary Review"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/191561bacfe3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Australasian+Parliamentary+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W2509187215","doi":"","title":"Petitioning the Australian parliament: Reviving a dying democratic tradition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Parliamentary Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Redress; Political science; Law; Democracy; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.045615308800601204,"score_gpt":0.3120668076720401,"score_spread":0.2664514988714389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509187215","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1622103,0.044877138,0.0009353565,0.62227935,0.00355052,0.010993713,0.0001261687,0.0013493983,0.15367804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93135846,0.045860916,0.00036678006,0.0042082313,0.00087549473,0.0001950068,0.000023183553,0.000038773673,0.017073156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997219,0.0006153375,0.0005762758,0.0004107607,0.0005491681,0.00062941224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988238,0.0001906501,0.00026597542,0.0004276174,0.00004850642,0.00024345407],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012301533,0.00025844027,0.0003650447,0.000057662386,0.0013237068,0.00015335665,0.0005102851,0.0000727747,0.00653075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006561101,0.00014945887,0.00022251629,0.0002791117,0.0004842211,0.00071087154,0.000030643805,0.00020193725,0.0007435824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023624494,0.00035960504,0.010407703,0.0032074524,0.0004167069,0.00016266535,0.011180301,0.0000015795823,0.0007048031,0.14802034,0.51067835,0.3148369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073584064,0.00013740356,0.0064840815,0.029407706,0.0005118816,0.00004602926,0.004308343,0.000001370158,0.0001649586,0.020112727,0.9372435,0.00084611913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038760537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010422632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7691482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031997857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012549471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532410346","doi":"","title":"Commonalities, intersections, and challenges for the scrutiny and interpretation of legislation in Trans-Tasman jurisdictions and beyond","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Parliamentary Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Commonwealth; Charter; Human rights; Law; Scope (computer science); Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06420674695101623,"score_gpt":0.32489390141247376,"score_spread":0.2606871544614575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532410346","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054069314,0.88216716,0.00023671958,0.05415774,0.00026638666,0.0013364487,0.00006115305,0.000017244654,0.007687853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7050165,0.29461873,0.00005359253,0.00019116889,0.000047380217,0.000054695913,0.0000043864497,0.0000017303197,0.000011839475],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994235,0.00009327696,0.00019113296,0.000088758265,0.00008140307,0.00012189973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996506,0.00018786661,0.000060393377,0.000040425108,0.000020072712,0.00004062304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050791504,0.00006607905,0.00015008329,0.000028659895,0.00027051853,0.000011006099,0.000035544093,0.000025423857,0.0000143667785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027061162,0.000051971794,0.00002707471,0.0000699684,0.00045513368,0.00024389954,0.00001344203,0.000055142722,2.6992308e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037106733,0.00011675231,0.1008833,0.0010621485,0.00017284506,2.8052446e-7,0.04956236,8.8445756e-7,0.000008393359,0.2457416,0.0011427669,0.60127157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006973028,0.0001945966,0.38394904,0.0030308373,0.0005774564,0.000016520513,0.09306757,0.000040898412,0.0000087511,0.011813659,0.5062866,0.00031675847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023288857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011153489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65094715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024067736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017014603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62239087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556394426","doi":"","title":"Oversight as it intersects with Parliament","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Parliamentary Review","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Contempt; Law; Parliament; George (robot); Wrongdoing; Officer; Political science; Injustice; Select committee; Commons; History","score_opus":0.02901104827814463,"score_gpt":0.322251712728459,"score_spread":0.2932406644503144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556394426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08897293,0.013024248,0.000052198182,0.39831772,0.0012446902,0.008352884,0.00006151076,0.00041461043,0.4895592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90911543,0.033007883,0.00050762616,0.036472,0.00038404224,0.00030135023,0.00005181939,0.000048323658,0.020111501],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972247,0.0002735715,0.0005007203,0.0004576995,0.00062062393,0.00092268456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984576,0.00007203456,0.00021333582,0.00048334218,0.00009749196,0.000676175],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036826357,0.00032656098,0.00048575603,0.00006743083,0.00045211168,0.00022965815,0.0004952831,0.00010037053,0.020466404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028629218,0.0002722224,0.00017652789,0.0003087018,0.00034774706,0.0005941668,0.000060274906,0.00030791634,0.0026016668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012390743,0.00020893865,0.0052058212,0.00089431554,0.00017987055,0.000093111266,0.003633613,8.049435e-7,0.0000115740195,0.021933852,0.9485221,0.019303625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040478833,0.0002553042,0.0016812121,0.0028200827,0.00013020985,0.000025786838,0.0067953407,9.737657e-7,0.00003455677,0.0016176112,0.98577535,0.00045876848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038700107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053514824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8201425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034069983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026518808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}