{"meta":{"query_hash":"191561bacfe3","filters":{"venue":"Australasian Parliamentary Review"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/191561bacfe3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Australasian+Parliamentary+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W2509187215","doi":"","title":"Petitioning the Australian parliament: Reviving a dying democratic tradition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Parliamentary Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Redress; Political science; Law; Democracy; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.045615308800601204,"score_gpt":0.3120668076720401,"score_spread":0.2664514988714389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509187215","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03235972,0.50760716,0.004340928,0.23140697,0.0053121075,0.00017259421,0.00004953039,0.000037695827,0.2187134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.582641,0.27967364,0.004198671,0.07094989,0.0026767112,0.00017172325,0.00004165861,0.000045501263,0.05960113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9725028,0.016718732,0.0011961177,0.00097639463,0.007009315,0.0015966969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808631,0.010527907,0.0018332282,0.0015382073,0.0038472621,0.0013903205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03351161,0.00028885063,0.0009524889,0.0019337733,0.005755666,0.0056046606,0.0017320119,0.005675131,0.0026534721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03155523,0.00043699748,0.0005318591,0.0020445648,0.014794266,0.0058130194,0.0048462097,0.0073052016,0.00048228764],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004330996,0.00008876284,0.0007571547,0.003563056,0.000056876248,0.00039794671,0.030521967,0.00036480054,0.00048864423,0.7213748,0.035963528,0.20637907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014582415,0.0001081782,0.004606467,0.0040388945,0.000036277477,0.00033231138,0.0033592233,0.00016102588,0.00028273702,0.03579609,0.9512324,0.00003177932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039770506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060067967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039770506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011318646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034909487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17722845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532410346","doi":"","title":"Commonalities, intersections, and challenges for the scrutiny and interpretation of legislation in Trans-Tasman jurisdictions and beyond","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Parliamentary Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Commonwealth; Charter; Human rights; Law; Scope (computer science); Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06420674695101623,"score_gpt":0.32489390141247376,"score_spread":0.2606871544614575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532410346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6224324,0.04336936,0.017090734,0.12938176,0.0006217456,0.00015938902,0.00009211304,0.0000803019,0.18677223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99353856,0.0015525325,0.0015967904,0.0015986296,0.00005472328,0.000026562295,0.000008347253,0.00001568077,0.0016082395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9499777,0.034785125,0.0020305158,0.0034585723,0.0046428666,0.005105276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9645068,0.020576367,0.0032885175,0.0022694394,0.0077029993,0.0016558766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04643541,0.0002409675,0.0008221983,0.003584701,0.011625633,0.015254407,0.0024270504,0.0028674502,0.0017089995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037740145,0.00076586095,0.0005798656,0.0041068955,0.049080107,0.0076890117,0.008046779,0.0049383766,0.00014651369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035574976,0.000018404908,0.008488025,0.0003961032,0.00008181905,0.00073654426,0.43663788,0.00057689263,0.0010098286,0.516146,0.0024972542,0.033375725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019374815,0.00010596966,0.065825775,0.0027387047,0.00011818704,0.0007895364,0.55755466,0.0015240398,0.0012351653,0.21337733,0.15651791,0.00019344299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22184187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35962528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22184187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032105736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040332556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4411012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556394426","doi":"","title":"Oversight as it intersects with Parliament","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Parliamentary Review","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Contempt; Law; Parliament; George (robot); Wrongdoing; Officer; Political science; Injustice; Select committee; Commons; History","score_opus":0.02901104827814463,"score_gpt":0.322251712728459,"score_spread":0.2932406644503144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556394426","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02418115,0.39172685,0.0057492373,0.28243968,0.010275268,0.00013274637,0.00017118458,0.0001458732,0.285178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7846161,0.08394973,0.0024114838,0.073092006,0.0043323073,0.00016453433,0.0001377899,0.00011187017,0.05118419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91551995,0.04623433,0.0042539034,0.007127543,0.0183809,0.008483404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8930556,0.058687743,0.012498762,0.006624064,0.022647887,0.0064859334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.062283717,0.00045262036,0.0012611955,0.0028015878,0.008539352,0.015586712,0.0021030847,0.0056188935,0.004927145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0954143,0.00086651504,0.00056486635,0.0051995423,0.017522292,0.0092336275,0.007602181,0.0077893944,0.0009041913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001521155,0.000056812856,0.0034483625,0.0021897992,0.000113735805,0.00032508798,0.025320416,0.0005146826,0.00040349233,0.61237794,0.11266648,0.24243106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047370475,0.000072908195,0.003720044,0.0018030606,0.000051625553,0.00013749218,0.0040077968,0.00007270358,0.00022869115,0.040788244,0.9490388,0.00003130794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12325136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12074629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12325136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026269764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07692508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32939166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}