{"meta":{"query_hash":"b2ccf31030fd","filters":{"venue":"Australasian User Interface Conference"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b2ccf31030fd","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Australasian+User+Interface+Conference"},"results":[{"id":"W1499478300","doi":"","title":"A case for iconic icons","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian User Interface Conference","topic":"Data Visualization and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; USable; Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Creativity; Representation (politics); User interface; Interface (matter); World Wide Web; Multimedia; Programming language; Psychology","score_opus":0.050386488979059785,"score_gpt":0.32716867465445115,"score_spread":0.27678218567539137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499478300","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028431846,0.000014802618,0.9664362,0.0013926396,0.00024791824,0.00022864419,0.000047797093,0.00021338055,0.002986738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791171,0.0000024486865,0.012612798,0.00016610343,0.000048904505,0.000021511201,0.00001865731,0.000011723336,0.00800075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987664,0.000031112926,0.00029991567,0.00042628456,0.00012267081,0.00035357487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990451,0.00006313577,0.00010239893,0.0005600246,0.00012719416,0.0001021579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000119225115,0.00017779386,0.00016960556,0.000095686635,0.00011529623,0.0005199546,0.00077386014,0.000073691364,0.00011164256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036096484,0.00017366678,0.00007370129,0.0002324857,0.00007459689,0.0005758838,0.00014889303,0.00010551089,0.00014443585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007039259,0.00017706597,0.0012749336,0.00004512393,0.000037193797,0.0003221763,0.00042171913,0.00014532439,0.002029121,0.9409833,0.049729202,0.004827812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003982908,0.0007786621,0.0020398153,0.00028766878,0.00013486895,0.005214087,0.001099376,0.39647847,0.09017551,0.036539994,0.46083868,0.0024299817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000088751825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023680025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95382345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031206204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111914254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7081926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517385187","doi":"","title":"A taxonomic analysis of user-interface metaphors in the Microsoft Office Project Gallery","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian User Interface Conference","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; User interface; Interface metaphor; Interface (matter); Human–computer interaction; User interface design; Taxonomy (biology); Natural user interface; Graphical user interface; World Wide Web; User experience design; Programming language; Operating system","score_opus":0.047950991765870934,"score_gpt":0.336025446854666,"score_spread":0.2880744550887951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517385187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97869974,0.00019975161,0.0029852795,0.0004921734,0.00030434877,0.0006710663,0.00010740361,0.00006212537,0.016478118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926371,0.000032153155,0.0005869452,0.00022714392,0.000059273796,0.00013189553,0.000032592114,0.000030091798,0.006262809],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707353,0.00052344974,0.00082235585,0.0007195029,0.0002696139,0.00059152767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822557,0.00023308444,0.00037434275,0.0009356361,0.00015747738,0.00007391201],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063305296,0.00040016635,0.0006936489,0.000628231,0.00005773718,0.00012557233,0.0010534216,0.00023456772,0.003964971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000694057,0.00031179425,0.00034851654,0.00111808,0.00022790184,0.00027974352,0.000089326044,0.000562583,0.0005146809],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0060739163,0.008733818,0.20469218,0.00049444527,0.025375316,0.0003240997,0.44625926,0.00304511,0.12758046,0.018906228,0.09902583,0.05948933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005957826,0.0013683848,0.6154362,0.0005494526,0.007244098,0.00023469032,0.14994422,0.0011922972,0.07773913,0.00015183487,0.13741526,0.0027666236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014434333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004886365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.410744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077829216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010396701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536947856","doi":"","title":"From pushing buttons to play and progress: value and interaction in fable","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian User Interface Conference","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Fable; Human–computer interaction; Interface (matter); Computer science; Value (mathematics); Game design; Computer game; Key (lock); Video game design; Game mechanics; Expression (computer science); User interface; Multimedia; Computer security","score_opus":0.025233126754961848,"score_gpt":0.3226696830498305,"score_spread":0.29743655629486865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536947856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96250856,0.00006749881,0.00016613722,0.0031824114,0.00022601735,0.0002326648,0.000014656583,0.000042298598,0.033559736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99249655,0.000017205444,0.0005906162,0.000050382136,0.00008981777,0.00001784878,0.000004118249,0.000008099286,0.006725349],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990432,0.000048717313,0.00017369285,0.00029712383,0.00014242851,0.0002948212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995984,0.0000718738,0.00004753832,0.000097335156,0.000037102134,0.00014773721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013772838,0.000116448995,0.00014288336,0.00007166985,0.00004858637,0.00047939623,0.00014157864,0.00008119073,0.00008458195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007079907,0.00011640895,0.000014867483,0.00012361299,0.00018094048,0.0005940805,0.00007374094,0.00015299473,0.000025567455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015170533,0.00041647346,0.40944216,0.0000673565,0.0000614431,0.00024735645,0.18766713,0.00016995055,0.007787376,0.064120226,0.008375556,0.32149327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082968915,0.000226606,0.36816347,0.0010498569,0.000029478817,0.000015014556,0.05904098,0.00017329017,0.0059233005,0.0056583853,0.55816734,0.0007225813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009948383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022123948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5497918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005233196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048939157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99664444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1936951549","doi":"","title":"Persuasive interaction for collectivist cultures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian User Interface Conference","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Collectivism; Persuasion; Set (abstract data type); Persuasive technology; Product (mathematics); Social psychology; Psychology; Individualism; Order (exchange); Sociology; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.0825605238884178,"score_gpt":0.4057111287757692,"score_spread":0.3231506048873514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1936951549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95734954,0.00006390845,0.004177801,0.0017906786,0.0013504426,0.00064348447,0.00007621031,0.00015168807,0.034396254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93005687,0.0000032500525,0.0002678454,0.00008660231,0.00023134152,0.00016447408,0.000040876257,0.000019644005,0.06912911],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986542,0.00005940643,0.00028873526,0.00047846176,0.00011543169,0.00040379385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992464,0.00008439262,0.00013985518,0.00023878376,0.00021850129,0.00007202617],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000058578033,0.00026160458,0.00024859092,0.0000663801,0.0001562327,0.00021222381,0.0002822093,0.00014934786,0.002297266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028303448,0.00021100616,0.00014227226,0.00012848647,0.000114129594,0.00020198476,0.0000355095,0.0002147339,0.00024641483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092808745,0.0006829795,0.030582137,0.000092166716,0.0003632432,0.000017750262,0.01437661,0.000068988345,0.034870595,0.11037355,0.8005788,0.007065135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039408444,0.001985927,0.59936917,0.00036910205,0.00025005417,0.00015968057,0.048336707,0.00045287088,0.045256317,0.0096860025,0.28847814,0.0017151935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010903726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088293053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56878704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007308128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021204614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}