{"meta":{"query_hash":"3ab4be9abf2d","filters":{"venue":"Australian indigenous law review"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3ab4be9abf2d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Australian+indigenous+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W2245760019","doi":"","title":"Comparative Analysis of Canadian Law, Aboriginal Law and Civil Law Traditions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian indigenous law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Project commissioning; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Comparative law; Publishing; Face (sociological concept); Common law; Sociology; Public law; Social science","score_opus":0.05499892801041512,"score_gpt":0.37051561079033435,"score_spread":0.31551668277991923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245760019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3879084,0.09082219,0.0005570801,0.0179446,0.0003213511,0.0001814936,0.002091242,0.000038393646,0.5001353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9245533,0.048077308,0.00089303724,0.0014171831,0.000077422475,0.000073990705,0.0008979828,0.000018768696,0.023991143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947365,0.00052756665,0.0001379517,0.00025248382,0.0031171709,0.0012283454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879111,0.0023986315,0.00068122824,0.00015634309,0.008082834,0.0007699933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003462397,0.00017849497,0.00042252778,0.015454865,0.010816281,0.0047999388,0.0012848912,0.00076085766,0.0067400527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014965941,0.00018875588,0.0002822288,0.032796092,0.003560832,0.0012639518,0.0016992901,0.00082005083,0.00018429768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014866942,0.000087592794,0.07500712,0.003251261,0.0002278332,0.0014264251,0.10463426,0.0012563032,0.00090818387,0.43601102,0.084071204,0.29297018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016110296,0.00006099342,0.5706474,0.0014220787,0.00019028544,0.0002741438,0.07174381,0.00045317409,0.00025962433,0.0056953663,0.34917435,0.000062742896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11165338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11165338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16505712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8101058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264260275","doi":"","title":"Rights-based judicial review and subtantive equality for aboriginal peoples: The case of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian indigenous law review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Judicial review; Political science; Politics; Supreme court; Judicial activism; Fundamental rights; Judicial interpretation; Government (linguistics); Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.02417302301368935,"score_gpt":0.34662231371400604,"score_spread":0.3224492907003167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264260275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3181329,0.027201097,0.0070671286,0.16872512,0.0011418064,0.0005736903,0.00025813674,0.000100834855,0.47679928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.924017,0.0057977056,0.0022372024,0.018027944,0.0002574831,0.0000908086,0.00005059878,0.000025588863,0.049495514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97877604,0.0037168392,0.0007637737,0.0014349329,0.007823938,0.0074844123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815149,0.009664728,0.0008290464,0.0007309865,0.0057954974,0.001464808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015373876,0.00033620774,0.0005510697,0.0018774905,0.027601935,0.011081578,0.0031959142,0.008727776,0.0021346675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031305265,0.00054058223,0.00063183875,0.0027490337,0.015175802,0.0022770923,0.003734746,0.0075966213,0.00018223259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004510808,0.000058450292,0.0052946503,0.00025965954,0.000060727583,0.002948674,0.020309396,0.0018675807,0.00087973144,0.9087404,0.03247674,0.027058883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002519438,0.0001324038,0.038560465,0.001061812,0.0005020883,0.0016191303,0.033053577,0.007492564,0.0040906845,0.17921703,0.73352224,0.0004960907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9609376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97963446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08894337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08894337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20965709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64533234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296305780","doi":"","title":"GENDERING DECOLONISAtION, DECOLONISING GENDER","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian indigenous law review","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disengagement theory; Decolonization; Sovereignty; Indigenous; Argument (complex analysis); Gender studies; Government (linguistics); Project commissioning; Political science; Publishing; Order (exchange); Sociology; Law; Politics; Gerontology","score_opus":0.06058360075024364,"score_gpt":0.36980709213105034,"score_spread":0.3092234913808067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296305780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060101725,0.031587582,0.0077433423,0.10911699,0.0019889146,0.00010118174,0.000083977226,0.00006268698,0.7892137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8017512,0.011755439,0.0019405207,0.021970551,0.0003607654,0.00009506811,0.000036154157,0.00006348097,0.16202676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925194,0.0021710112,0.0001845435,0.00056406046,0.002210001,0.002350985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965036,0.0014761951,0.0003341144,0.00029819828,0.0010837887,0.00030416818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008653164,0.00032401268,0.0006130075,0.00110058,0.010789015,0.0069659264,0.0016380629,0.003473776,0.00506916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008598256,0.00018865007,0.00036850778,0.0012323164,0.043624267,0.0043249507,0.0048083216,0.003848259,0.00039525158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010215883,0.000008064629,0.00051061786,0.00010564831,0.0000035593857,0.00012683844,0.020531729,0.000102476,0.0003213053,0.9526798,0.010871392,0.014728271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012880938,0.00004853294,0.004236851,0.0007278995,0.000026864927,0.00028735888,0.045005787,0.00015727027,0.0014074493,0.16235144,0.7856938,0.000043811502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44246215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.625171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44246215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020566775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043302998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87977344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297942181","doi":"","title":"Constitutional vision and judicial commitment : Aboriginal and treaty rights in Canada.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian indigenous law review","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Project commissioning; Publishing; Political science; Law; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.011954241267969479,"score_gpt":0.31216186903191107,"score_spread":0.3002076277639416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297942181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14483933,0.11622623,0.0015229181,0.1790682,0.0013750632,0.00012511319,0.0011267428,0.00008604721,0.55563045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9000076,0.02131887,0.00073467917,0.011310196,0.00020252485,0.000041836833,0.00015135377,0.000042134816,0.066190876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942035,0.0007464679,0.000113506074,0.00032728785,0.0022497342,0.0023594452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945381,0.001832247,0.00031329956,0.00015810736,0.0022843308,0.00087380444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041792206,0.0002824,0.00035863594,0.0022798206,0.023191221,0.010723198,0.0026302137,0.0040102038,0.0059883627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014820108,0.00031344965,0.00028059274,0.005045615,0.017253915,0.0025705085,0.0024253642,0.0049306196,0.00025661296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033585162,0.000033141307,0.0031715203,0.00018723743,0.000023304061,0.00034571934,0.03640604,0.0005350226,0.00021794309,0.85648215,0.07042947,0.032134805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006400629,0.000033988686,0.070800796,0.0010024154,0.00012451234,0.00019043712,0.057885632,0.0010627161,0.0007167918,0.07200517,0.7959381,0.0001754926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15539761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15539761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27127847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.979619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299186425","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Policy and Its Historical Occlusions: The North American and Global Contexts of Australian Settlement","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian indigenous law review","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Law; Treaty; Treaty of Waitangi; Settlement (finance); Context (archaeology); Tribunal; Political science; Indigenous rights; Project commissioning; Sociology; History; Publishing; Human rights; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.036792350055621904,"score_gpt":0.3440817994244508,"score_spread":0.30728944936882885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299186425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20707813,0.32865623,0.0009409492,0.09702318,0.0012158199,0.000050457973,0.00010274116,0.000020513615,0.36491197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8653136,0.114056,0.0003782144,0.0057008876,0.0005435495,0.00006725341,0.000037360973,0.000017293745,0.013885796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964546,0.0018147908,0.00013005265,0.00032034243,0.0006589771,0.0006211434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738103,0.0013400271,0.0003355062,0.00021975729,0.00040940294,0.00031427122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060900906,0.00023423428,0.00062907167,0.0030213604,0.0061036884,0.0076237274,0.0010097846,0.0020000509,0.003971485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00514552,0.00029469738,0.0002652953,0.007424605,0.019836327,0.0063352464,0.006361738,0.0034223755,0.00020295929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030919473,0.00005449657,0.0035584231,0.0014098345,0.000042324264,0.0008180249,0.26841092,0.00037551296,0.00026953983,0.63733494,0.009468982,0.07822604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008409938,0.00007688982,0.05747645,0.0036886176,0.00005606372,0.0005154703,0.12659441,0.00020439096,0.00014413432,0.05207419,0.75911176,0.000049174767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17178641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23814791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17178641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015833914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011041846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34157306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992840148","doi":"","title":"Government Responses to the Indian Residential Schools Settlement in Canada: Implications for Australia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian indigenous law review","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Project commissioning; Publishing; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Compensation (psychology); Political science; Momentum (technical analysis); Criminology; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.06158523050582097,"score_gpt":0.35868711736968567,"score_spread":0.2971018868638647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992840148","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37815925,0.014416915,0.0004502068,0.49241394,0.0014017517,0.00022384827,0.0002652762,0.00006590997,0.11260293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8853531,0.010676626,0.0006316133,0.055462334,0.0002957513,0.00010218328,0.00008391311,0.000033313772,0.047361203],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99175346,0.0013118745,0.00017227113,0.0003341699,0.002133278,0.0042949743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98946077,0.0021638875,0.0007585231,0.00019515053,0.004258053,0.0031634774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004889745,0.00027052016,0.00045362595,0.0018466321,0.02868144,0.00912415,0.003036426,0.0058152685,0.0061108344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012455422,0.0002877443,0.0005287966,0.0034573248,0.010102125,0.00150085,0.006375358,0.006136408,0.00023143957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023145351,0.00030913798,0.048846096,0.0015223917,0.00012072519,0.010149162,0.2805215,0.0024619952,0.0018044864,0.28017586,0.24653295,0.12732413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056632252,0.00009421069,0.07507034,0.0007954628,0.000101686484,0.00046795324,0.50416493,0.0006180459,0.00046175285,0.009646544,0.40831536,0.00020711772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9909526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8763103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12368973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29685706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.897436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034273189","doi":"","title":"Crimes against future inuit generations: Heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants (POPs)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian indigenous law review","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biomagnification; Indigenous; Environmental protection; Pollutant; Arctic; Mercury (programming language); Environmental science; Environmental health; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.058609162447448016,"score_gpt":0.3523295667271519,"score_spread":0.29372040427970386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034273189","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01909479,0.81105584,0.00016889832,0.11391659,0.0023840605,0.000024633046,0.00007192027,0.000007700344,0.053275492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19088559,0.72877306,0.00023021863,0.055988017,0.0016132954,0.000048339214,0.000065958746,0.000011223122,0.022384377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978002,0.0008485474,0.00015125875,0.00016631656,0.00064815086,0.0003855406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975884,0.0011886023,0.0003408797,0.000059728845,0.00056794664,0.00025451893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029489906,0.00028383546,0.00044088165,0.0016315479,0.0037667502,0.0024927668,0.0011498366,0.0041580065,0.0030039544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046056793,0.0002492848,0.00040408626,0.0018049955,0.0045693573,0.0023008424,0.00211093,0.0035984244,0.00032381012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045417568,0.000102444006,0.0041399905,0.008985006,0.00017704256,0.002104279,0.039361898,0.00032337173,0.00048028302,0.49231386,0.2045376,0.24742875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008181178,0.000077955796,0.017117709,0.007646218,0.00008694997,0.00082761946,0.01376797,0.000072723866,0.00019142451,0.010005651,0.9501577,0.00003982435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12206214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14914478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87793785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004741485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013332089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24270332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W97145762","doi":"","title":"A reflection of the nature of the political community? The in-principle agreement as to Canadian residential schools compensation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian indigenous law review","topic":"Diverse Education Studies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Project commissioning; Publishing; Reflection (computer programming); Compensation (psychology); Politics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Media studies; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03992098059527406,"score_gpt":0.37339690867215836,"score_spread":0.3334759280768843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W97145762","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03784849,0.0045680823,0.0017501408,0.7773172,0.0021232902,0.00006397799,0.00016920056,0.000043952605,0.17611565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6965275,0.0024085327,0.0016113812,0.20172808,0.00086345576,0.00007112446,0.00005851799,0.00010770663,0.09662375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9698048,0.0049797352,0.00074219564,0.003259483,0.01082387,0.01038986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713235,0.010833865,0.0006702994,0.0010832098,0.01191761,0.0041714706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02432066,0.0005833427,0.001097949,0.0022813592,0.04693652,0.027129503,0.0059905713,0.025342792,0.010041707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043515913,0.0008883435,0.0008759901,0.0031950334,0.03585957,0.009752554,0.0072936956,0.03720841,0.00048580024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022327315,0.000023115683,0.00094793236,0.000065104934,0.000012876912,0.000120049204,0.022915179,0.00020100335,0.00019696188,0.88447356,0.08335926,0.007662714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006450934,0.000038651873,0.009878474,0.00059671485,0.00007060339,0.00013662671,0.06962959,0.0009863473,0.0006643245,0.11142161,0.8062331,0.00027953356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9831345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1198223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1198223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25091517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8693757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}