{"meta":{"query_hash":"bbc89b2e1f10","filters":{"venue":"Australian international law journal"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/bbc89b2e1f10","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Australian+international+law+journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1489741013","doi":"","title":"The Charter of Rights Debate: A Battle of the Models","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian international law journal","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Human rights; Redress; Statutory law; Law; Battle; Political science; Sociology; Publishing; Project commissioning; Parallels; Bill of rights; International human rights law; Public administration; Law and economics; Economics; History","score_opus":0.034274712233231405,"score_gpt":0.3232841550520457,"score_spread":0.2890094428188143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489741013","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012891199,0.009886617,0.027282875,0.71430135,0.003174707,0.00006738109,0.000081735554,0.00009428335,0.23221985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.871909,0.0071037794,0.012520932,0.06958631,0.0058202064,0.000465213,0.00007648222,0.00024595606,0.032272093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92732316,0.048863463,0.0013531044,0.0038504542,0.014437353,0.0041724364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9529399,0.034683935,0.002067016,0.0038091263,0.0040487233,0.0024513274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05903926,0.0007113832,0.00155643,0.0037550176,0.01698922,0.03443,0.004449351,0.018098423,0.004632175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06142924,0.0009705163,0.0010814416,0.002911972,0.09512849,0.036693256,0.009253637,0.027861517,0.00091448554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027411659,0.000002938111,0.000011644084,0.0000066192606,7.01029e-7,0.000004674234,0.0012562192,0.000050695107,0.0000066323596,0.9959055,0.001855915,0.0008956355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018715853,0.0000143299085,0.000102237194,0.0001828763,0.000003235054,0.000018580267,0.004389274,0.0005851226,0.000048588863,0.93639284,0.058222946,0.000021267002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034500573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022626521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05903926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031676225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029801661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3122332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504356376","doi":"","title":"The International Law of Climate Change","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian international law journal","topic":"Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; International law; Climate change; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Law; Political science; International community; Political economy of climate change; Government (linguistics); Montreal Protocol; Legitimacy; Environmental law; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.1577129586334829,"score_gpt":0.38173560565253783,"score_spread":0.22402264701905494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504356376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011666534,0.036970906,0.003013873,0.16132987,0.0106878085,0.00004187953,0.00017184105,0.00008960367,0.7865275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19384235,0.035050258,0.0035348835,0.20400734,0.025607895,0.00045548961,0.00044136454,0.00038986627,0.5366706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993504,0.0019880652,0.0003600891,0.000954462,0.0023570096,0.00083644455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764687,0.0009837325,0.00022374299,0.0004497563,0.00048675766,0.00020918643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052229417,0.0005346029,0.00072831236,0.001148633,0.0064308075,0.010783881,0.0018994169,0.010089186,0.015468077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01103304,0.000511596,0.0008295959,0.0017736211,0.013952614,0.0075094043,0.0065636714,0.01371374,0.004279726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004362134,0.0000072449643,0.00006480092,0.00004574794,0.0000033659774,0.000030896532,0.0007971426,0.000064361986,0.000043564403,0.895382,0.09683746,0.0067191017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034726945,0.000006742525,0.00031726086,0.00016346146,0.0000040795685,0.000034765108,0.00021791484,0.00012710108,0.00003600023,0.1267404,0.87233853,0.000010157895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0134329945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011877221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015468077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064222245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00895501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05174589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533771626","doi":"","title":"Jurisdiction and Choice of Law Rules for Defamation Actions in Australia Following the Gutnick Case and the Uniform Defamation Legislation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian international law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Jurisdiction; Law; Conflict of laws; Tort; Damages; Legislation; Plaintiff; Certainty; Publishing; High Court; Harm; Political science; Exclusive jurisdiction; Common law; Project commissioning; Legal certainty; Liability","score_opus":0.06615435756069121,"score_gpt":0.3853155047127825,"score_spread":0.31916114715209126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533771626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6432474,0.003237824,0.0054010944,0.020038126,0.00012449012,0.00011640885,0.00006721921,0.000027048,0.3277405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98418355,0.00053493044,0.00097856,0.0023737568,0.00007756539,0.000041727268,0.000014375766,0.0000071763866,0.011788381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844077,0.004852721,0.0011032767,0.0017351765,0.0050562704,0.002844749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769751,0.015261231,0.002880489,0.0014570849,0.002092058,0.0013339925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009685969,0.00014723437,0.00046747125,0.0015964084,0.006572803,0.010373569,0.0015992572,0.005189484,0.0034187832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029302191,0.000660818,0.00059499545,0.001182647,0.011138188,0.0047840094,0.00593916,0.0061059888,0.00037863373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001086266,0.000100914396,0.011578149,0.00011065387,0.000038385573,0.0048972466,0.018829858,0.0019092645,0.0018926838,0.93719727,0.0030499285,0.020287035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020798374,0.00049953227,0.1036066,0.0011083701,0.00032408995,0.006155686,0.0239927,0.015026747,0.006439873,0.6132422,0.22889335,0.00050281937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054120824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.085763015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054120824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008259227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073156315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107611656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}