{"meta":{"query_hash":"6a04a3fa032a","filters":{"venue":"Baltic Journal of Law & Politics"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6a04a3fa032a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Baltic+Journal+of+Law+%26+Politics"},"results":[{"id":"W1497775265","doi":"10.2478/v10076-012-0012-0","title":"Faculty Intellectual Property Rights in Canadian Universities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Baltic Journal of Law & Politics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Principal (computer security); Political science; Public administration; Regional science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.1140856201630578,"score_gpt":0.2543681647340264,"score_spread":0.14028254457096861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497775265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7245442,0.000118219425,0.000021715312,0.00054214965,0.0008548,0.00010593184,0.000007966087,0.0000120361665,0.27379295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948512,0.000002805048,0.000062173305,0.0021568225,0.0011217231,3.5919123e-7,0.000009447982,0.000011212363,0.0017842968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986486,0.000023803135,0.00034134244,0.00007132734,0.00022632416,0.0006886204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999351,0.00005568879,0.0001356969,0.00008738428,0.0002652544,0.000104944236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004024237,0.00014196402,0.00021182252,0.00032910585,0.00021027397,0.00009766549,0.00025477546,0.000079770245,0.0005675651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012698704,0.000089213194,0.00008193616,0.00014840576,0.000109760564,0.0011216184,0.00004804493,0.00028649537,0.00028077784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113365895,0.000310423,0.012766956,0.00017445633,0.000120780554,0.00019954369,0.0058606807,0.000073937634,0.00004248976,0.9595351,0.020460777,0.0003414588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004861577,0.000033688968,0.001159054,0.00012310149,0.000055634617,0.00007340911,0.00094027066,0.00052396103,0.00014256628,0.0022971942,0.9939541,0.00021081374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44399887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08940092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9734934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038141696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025747778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92721516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036865304","doi":"10.2478/bjlp-2013-0013","title":"The supreme court of Canada and the offender’s right to be transferred to serve his sentence in Canada: interpreting the international transfer of offenders act in light of Canada’s national and international human rights obligations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Baltic Journal of Law & Politics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of the Western Cape; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Appeal; Charter; Political science; Discretion; Jurisprudence; Sociology","score_opus":0.027626439528948273,"score_gpt":0.2773204547638114,"score_spread":0.24969401523486312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036865304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86088765,0.00008160171,0.000010155025,0.13395666,0.00035848192,0.00032755098,0.00008363452,9.057112e-7,0.0042933766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988209,0.00001894745,0.000039974777,0.00088874117,0.00005737695,0.000007926921,0.000001419769,0.0000045785155,0.00016014144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974621,0.00021057775,0.00078750984,0.00010595687,0.001150973,0.00028289447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977661,0.0009901515,0.00018451609,0.000071964445,0.00084658974,0.00014068735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087740197,0.000119132004,0.0002741153,0.000050509912,0.0003978966,0.00003893099,0.00055078894,0.0000315747,0.000043292028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040615848,0.00006675955,0.000048597078,0.00010492325,0.00040152154,0.00014558509,0.000049079623,0.00020831451,2.9587252e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014889079,0.00010157238,0.026383193,0.000056591594,0.00069724245,0.000014947241,0.105877444,0.0009993064,0.0011096082,0.8489982,0.015488344,0.00012468194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0076528853,0.00024293743,0.6567182,0.0014772043,0.00024299328,0.000075480624,0.1650989,0.0029499899,0.008193145,0.03472212,0.1215796,0.0010465516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81427604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017570689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036307606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64408135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166352728","doi":"10.2478/v10076-009-0009-5","title":"The Second Dimension of Democracy: The People and Their Constitution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Baltic Journal of Law & Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Constitution; Polity; Ideal (ethics); Legitimacy; Bureaucracy; Law; Political science; Constitutionalism; Law and economics; Sociology; Power (physics); Separation of powers; State (computer science); Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.032486612248181716,"score_gpt":0.31760066338195553,"score_spread":0.2851140511337738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166352728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7216871,0.002035196,0.0001867799,0.11121018,0.00071496173,0.000187918,0.000023644641,0.00001215197,0.16394211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970007,0.00019009467,0.000048932478,0.0022983989,0.00035450034,1.40244e-7,1.9277275e-7,0.0000021752016,0.00010489293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987997,0.00025553317,0.00033588064,0.00005095851,0.00027105887,0.00028687002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795884,0.0013230823,0.0002007101,0.000114505776,0.00024549596,0.00015736629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013492948,0.00007130284,0.00015703951,0.000016461008,0.0010394092,0.00005250621,0.0002054731,0.000079151825,0.000010981093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056736096,0.00003619476,0.00007802707,0.000055773955,0.0015415212,0.0001308127,0.000019933917,0.00030443538,0.0000012264574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072933262,0.000023003335,0.0000731988,0.0000051301927,0.000011734555,0.0000015132383,0.0040464886,0.0000016323927,0.00010139918,0.99538666,0.000104672,0.00023726528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016648884,0.000106038606,0.0015641707,0.000036844798,0.000028498798,0.00003878081,0.0016986115,0.000020661995,0.00053368707,0.95267093,0.043085165,0.00005010481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019727356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003781206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27531362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005046126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003523478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7994401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893713598","doi":"10.2478/bjlp-2018-0002","title":"The Montreal Convention of 1999 and Regulation No 261/2004 in the EUCJ and National Case Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Baltic Journal of Law & Politics","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Convention; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02068150836729675,"score_gpt":0.32275350151983495,"score_spread":0.3020719931525382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893713598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8686037,0.00029716207,0.000095547555,0.003730014,0.00039484692,0.00015209733,0.000018915534,0.0000031697402,0.12670454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988127,0.000037266527,0.000102994505,0.00030147444,0.00053386064,6.2705243e-7,0.0000014843598,0.0000023743514,0.00020725188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990124,0.00016431193,0.00027451516,0.000043684195,0.0003977059,0.000107377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988065,0.00033518407,0.0002236565,0.000036163467,0.0005633206,0.000035201432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012985533,0.00004089688,0.00006757069,0.000024764111,0.00038750397,0.00006323553,0.000076896744,0.00003775414,0.00000857053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018306151,0.00002644295,0.000027490027,0.00003689094,0.0005612745,0.00018215716,0.0000092555265,0.00007202142,0.0000011121527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012032121,0.000020698242,0.00033336386,0.000003507353,0.000008728191,0.000007588617,0.0018238177,0.000002326077,0.0000288554,0.9975209,0.00009556704,0.00014259982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014103616,0.0003472942,0.034931876,0.00012981231,0.00007402118,0.0008065793,0.0025998536,0.0010553444,0.00032578103,0.8478723,0.110307254,0.00013947535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00954714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016972663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14964858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006531942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011507443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}