{"meta":{"query_hash":"3e63af01b072","filters":{"venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3e63af01b072","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Berkley+Law+Scholarship+Repository+%28University+of+California%2C+Berkeley%29"},"results":[{"id":"W2284616397","doi":"","title":"Book Review - Courts and Federalism: Judicial Doctrine in the United States, Australia, and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Doctrine; Politics","score_opus":0.019187953659383302,"score_gpt":0.2548938742137268,"score_spread":0.23570592055434347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284616397","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00082355377,0.8358894,0.0003374045,0.04803111,0.022156563,0.000069087015,0.00071621494,0.000052272757,0.09192444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014228173,0.83869725,0.00057655864,0.019576503,0.014509875,0.00010542024,0.00081567786,0.00008228125,0.11140826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980647,0.00027071845,0.00008032609,0.00012276707,0.001274253,0.00018722349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887108,0.0026954038,0.00039009543,0.00013152751,0.007647935,0.0004241895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013687472,0.000887948,0.0014831525,0.0074812965,0.003549742,0.006297331,0.001625898,0.0033887622,0.016957555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009211846,0.0005208456,0.0005157544,0.023427486,0.0027848724,0.002239209,0.0008296252,0.0033761538,0.003549204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004347188,0.0000071690924,0.00021434363,0.0004020308,0.0000092888085,0.000019499605,0.0001249856,0.00018400028,0.000020665711,0.00755668,0.96890825,0.022548676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049878786,0.0000063452203,0.002077827,0.0022413414,0.000032215143,0.000039736944,0.0003435447,0.0000863012,0.000025499765,0.0030422152,0.9920846,0.000015419952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74210656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91376233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25789344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026083952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06301784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51882446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288180810","doi":"","title":"Protecting Equality in the Face of Terror: Ethnic and Racial Profiling and the Charter","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Profiling (computer programming); Racial profiling; Ethnic group; Political science; Criminology; Face (sociological concept); Computer security; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Race (biology); Gender studies; Social science","score_opus":0.03482487780636943,"score_gpt":0.28210895812917847,"score_spread":0.24728408032280905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288180810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04501922,0.009084158,0.0058963243,0.14156027,0.0010670847,0.000068219335,0.00006491482,0.000035291894,0.7972046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9278738,0.005390141,0.0025878046,0.01976742,0.00047285482,0.000073716874,0.000036707122,0.00003885566,0.043758813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99395376,0.0019021068,0.00008310306,0.00027108015,0.0016442825,0.002145776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850273,0.0006534715,0.00014848034,0.00013404783,0.0002741498,0.0002872443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006743383,0.00026333472,0.00038166577,0.0010025521,0.019577138,0.013774989,0.0010522647,0.0035710926,0.0032719295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006834774,0.00019986763,0.00021643363,0.001294672,0.052372206,0.0074847178,0.0057879738,0.0065090256,0.0003403417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004870662,0.0000047615194,0.00016286771,0.000008855838,8.898892e-7,0.000033982265,0.009584435,0.00006238677,0.000047653193,0.9770234,0.005923629,0.007142222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001446015,0.000030428128,0.0031332378,0.00039874617,0.000014244793,0.0001011571,0.04146316,0.0002984587,0.000476897,0.5598512,0.3941713,0.000046703317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3451329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54381245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3451329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017301433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03958413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68624794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795640617","doi":"","title":"Foreword to Jane Sprott and Anthony Doob, Justice for Girls? Stability and Change in the Youth Justice Systems of the United States and Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Sociology; Gerontology; Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.03316421419006109,"score_gpt":0.25690513686825994,"score_spread":0.22374092267819884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795640617","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014395714,0.032744225,0.00013694433,0.7889571,0.16847415,0.00008462626,0.00054244156,0.000058679194,0.008857781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022940738,0.030485202,0.00028215005,0.7042229,0.09827068,0.00019327519,0.00032120288,0.00014950825,0.16378099],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986047,0.00024259184,0.00013273401,0.00019733752,0.00063434406,0.00018827365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876401,0.0037393498,0.0004327268,0.000180149,0.0058715125,0.002136294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023919642,0.0015703667,0.0020551074,0.002750634,0.0070049595,0.0059786635,0.0026964776,0.014228095,0.030645404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014478819,0.0007538268,0.00081841426,0.0019980387,0.0023408139,0.0045802863,0.0031961694,0.017693475,0.017898383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027406857,0.0000034267098,0.000020947567,0.000021077884,9.710539e-7,0.000010755051,0.00003373074,0.0000036885585,0.0000061637384,0.00014465074,0.99860966,0.0011422378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017330458,0.000007642842,0.00077128824,0.00034314606,0.0000091421125,0.00007021896,0.0010598262,0.00003285724,0.000034772278,0.0007103313,0.9969246,0.000018862282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23238635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36045587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76761365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006096652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011362765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46206743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123230358","doi":"","title":"Is Every Ballot Equal? Visible Minority Vote Dilution in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Spoilt vote; Contingent vote; Voting; Political science; Group voting ticket; Law","score_opus":0.019130765123254553,"score_gpt":0.24139193420845834,"score_spread":0.22226116908520377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123230358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5735648,0.004058583,0.0016451518,0.07680131,0.00091019593,0.00018294164,0.0012016764,0.00010781356,0.34152743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97726864,0.0009956396,0.00036539312,0.004339745,0.000057858182,0.000013891328,0.00022195073,0.000037810416,0.01669907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99235886,0.00061857764,0.00018665411,0.00061920704,0.0038305623,0.002385996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98666316,0.001956662,0.0010922765,0.0004788042,0.007184334,0.0026247792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034991843,0.00018388395,0.00051477057,0.0013415803,0.010629559,0.0051157456,0.0015205815,0.0010309775,0.009964133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023477303,0.00025688176,0.0004155395,0.003058093,0.004534435,0.0014808013,0.0018095985,0.0029673383,0.00065366726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046600605,0.00017722056,0.4203824,0.00032872157,0.00012557386,0.0011454253,0.022622112,0.0013434676,0.0009349606,0.09295436,0.20401767,0.2555021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008553051,0.0001272397,0.5794669,0.0005965667,0.00010117845,0.0004653152,0.033028107,0.0035500368,0.0016334599,0.016483616,0.36420867,0.00025331005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98144066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07262181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07262181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07001177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52691054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123780835","doi":"","title":"Still Not Equal? Visible Minority Vote Dilution in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Legislature; Spoilt vote; Representation (politics); Census; Contingent vote; Population; Political science; Dilution; Demographic economics; Public administration; Group voting ticket; Law; Economics; Sociology; Demography; Politics","score_opus":0.01367761541670631,"score_gpt":0.217335122982237,"score_spread":0.2036575075655307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123780835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8625091,0.0014278775,0.0029067774,0.013087518,0.00012674312,0.0000681569,0.00045679987,0.00009905428,0.119317956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994823,0.0001849025,0.00041119728,0.00061489415,0.000012771457,0.0000061772275,0.0000734688,0.000019604508,0.0038540282],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944365,0.00059812824,0.00011355779,0.00049931416,0.0024873526,0.0018651595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617237,0.000691317,0.00040304865,0.00028336304,0.0019228348,0.0005270994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002428822,0.0001930246,0.0006694532,0.0014538324,0.009119629,0.0038781438,0.0011159562,0.00075129594,0.004541421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01388523,0.00020265472,0.00035563982,0.003070587,0.0051654056,0.0011909838,0.0025924845,0.0014257419,0.00021955486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063525554,0.00007447477,0.44981056,0.00021059757,0.00018471543,0.0015926368,0.03673908,0.0051344503,0.0038393585,0.25180417,0.036103792,0.2138709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107749656,0.00013904867,0.6623474,0.00036322372,0.00015921102,0.000671344,0.052201595,0.0099028,0.0059286086,0.05479846,0.21311967,0.00026088627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9598039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97975713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04019612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038199533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034743756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27715826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987971761","doi":"","title":"Voter Equality & Other Canadian Values: Finding the Right Balance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Principal (computer security); Legislation; Voting; Legislature; Population; Inequality; Norm (philosophy); House of Commons","score_opus":0.04256906878473336,"score_gpt":0.2539732784688585,"score_spread":0.2114042096841251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987971761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009252945,0.0025626249,0.0010442385,0.10978386,0.0008357725,0.0000714856,0.00035353584,0.00007515542,0.87602043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4396996,0.0030652308,0.0028472177,0.04025115,0.00039008912,0.00010420442,0.0002532491,0.00018180966,0.5132075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99498063,0.0005996559,0.00008002986,0.00044009186,0.002203976,0.0016954873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798775,0.00024766356,0.000063318446,0.0001324706,0.0010891603,0.00047964428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022518516,0.00037884695,0.00032250013,0.0013579554,0.03526768,0.010777418,0.0012766928,0.0040235254,0.017378392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050082332,0.00028659328,0.0003707768,0.0021151658,0.01215512,0.002413269,0.0029772567,0.0047835144,0.0015178091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014551417,0.0000148580875,0.0015476969,0.00003441301,0.000006832142,0.00017575601,0.0050452305,0.00014558947,0.00018886263,0.77137136,0.19362317,0.027831675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012132539,0.000010613581,0.005202779,0.0001177637,0.0000148586505,0.0000809368,0.007953645,0.0002474704,0.00035333505,0.04550635,0.9404446,0.00005555728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.982114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99263203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06546086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06546086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10607394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.474954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990265180","doi":"","title":"del Justice for girls? : stability and change in the youth justice systems of the United States and Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Public policy","score_opus":0.03583063583601039,"score_gpt":0.2510306680333881,"score_spread":0.21520003219737768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990265180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96950185,0.0010968233,0.00012411035,0.014569422,0.00008992337,0.00006370505,0.0011504298,0.000016491455,0.013387189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961045,0.00040294352,0.000076925564,0.00055063225,0.000012266233,0.00001940649,0.00029062154,0.000011440029,0.0025314519],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952992,0.00048251558,0.00012531225,0.00042133222,0.0009080499,0.0027636245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907086,0.0005020142,0.00085705396,0.00020565047,0.0037298256,0.003996885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025715835,0.00029540234,0.000825669,0.0033521897,0.024024002,0.0112955645,0.0039668474,0.0013889287,0.0048229606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011164325,0.0004065297,0.00058118446,0.0070051355,0.0074573853,0.0030853858,0.006461212,0.0032598255,0.00029994387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001862117,0.00023180745,0.75402856,0.000079214886,0.0001730798,0.0004525284,0.15059593,0.00057191146,0.00024117199,0.02540109,0.020991422,0.047047004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020753861,0.000038912676,0.7505253,0.0001409467,0.000058443376,0.00006222873,0.22751646,0.00047775693,0.00015036586,0.0020013805,0.01895075,0.000056584093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99637717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99857485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11542267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11542267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18495537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.837454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991854019","doi":"","title":"Introduction: Exploring the Dilemmas of Solidarity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Redistribution (election); Federalism; Politics; Welfare state; Vision; Social policy; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.012563003034759468,"score_gpt":0.19788534096094426,"score_spread":0.1853223379261848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991854019","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008202148,0.029660296,0.011973682,0.4805979,0.0033023634,0.00010294266,0.00073568214,0.00007890817,0.465346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53689927,0.041639596,0.016400892,0.20423484,0.0063610896,0.00032162134,0.0006281769,0.0002736858,0.19324085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575114,0.001633279,0.00008574002,0.00056782755,0.0011756397,0.00078641094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938836,0.0037910794,0.00018471821,0.00024823722,0.0014981431,0.00039417678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005492743,0.0006690003,0.00058094907,0.0017894879,0.014219631,0.013453635,0.0027052602,0.008473829,0.017810294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008966591,0.0003828039,0.00077860703,0.0032136724,0.028567752,0.008584333,0.0037695174,0.008099777,0.0016128533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013867268,0.000007762914,0.00018234587,0.000078171804,0.0000032118055,0.00008558973,0.00452793,0.00028764314,0.00006346789,0.9455255,0.043967303,0.0052572163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000956196,0.000012590625,0.00040713622,0.00033295108,0.000007080566,0.00008745796,0.0055439584,0.00034744228,0.00013132315,0.45163676,0.54146224,0.000021436012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3729426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3618689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3729426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03130042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026674796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74154365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992732555","doi":"","title":"Measuring Judicial Activism on the Supreme Court of Canada: A Comment on Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v. Newfoundland Association of Public Employees","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Charter; Supreme court; Legislation; Judicial review; Legislature; Judicial independence; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.04258538527582147,"score_gpt":0.23429999410074406,"score_spread":0.19171460882492258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992732555","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28984195,0.012842014,0.0008333111,0.5729277,0.0020113895,0.00027762205,0.0027508615,0.000116180665,0.118398964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7997201,0.0035597177,0.00077215256,0.15337537,0.0013757404,0.00015635,0.0006599446,0.00006959215,0.040310934],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771986,0.002880618,0.00083258306,0.0025846998,0.009437435,0.0070661083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91501385,0.04930396,0.0055323844,0.0015095056,0.022959422,0.005680902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0143747665,0.0008419991,0.0007460649,0.004169268,0.042884115,0.015028047,0.0047125057,0.015016151,0.0030042687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05687198,0.001015958,0.0009259171,0.007624507,0.012055375,0.0031354108,0.0019578154,0.014496111,0.0003340626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043062304,0.00028540712,0.16299763,0.00050131633,0.00034253477,0.0024596571,0.10904975,0.00092242024,0.0018650212,0.104405165,0.57847315,0.03826733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001320486,0.00022167317,0.5172376,0.0011739327,0.0006497999,0.000252788,0.10884856,0.0013871125,0.003415909,0.0044400133,0.3616772,0.00056325505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99521685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8329582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16704178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14548694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96611345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008858639","doi":"","title":"del Courts and Federalism: Judicial Doctrine in the United States, Australia, and Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Doctrine; Legislation; Judicial review; Government (linguistics); Constitution","score_opus":0.034943551358552774,"score_gpt":0.25158738037617095,"score_spread":0.2166438290176182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008858639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5249403,0.019201342,0.0010447367,0.10936832,0.00033991964,0.00007611809,0.0005517291,0.00005585471,0.34442165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96737593,0.0029377106,0.00039847058,0.004029547,0.00006699034,0.000020910635,0.00005352045,0.000020323721,0.025096629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481994,0.0008491338,0.00015246462,0.0003234017,0.0017563371,0.0020987182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98806006,0.003991976,0.00064947683,0.00023825519,0.0045229173,0.0025374023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039974125,0.0001649855,0.00054753147,0.0029309231,0.020694204,0.013242043,0.0018548948,0.0044113947,0.0060051437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019968871,0.00053300936,0.00036614126,0.0055965367,0.012154861,0.0029382578,0.0032477765,0.005915865,0.00023437571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006564452,0.00008528956,0.018202594,0.0000803753,0.000036768288,0.000287672,0.030002173,0.001185885,0.00019634164,0.8812781,0.038621172,0.02995802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010822697,0.000085792584,0.28677863,0.001020787,0.0001634399,0.00024390695,0.08254451,0.00591203,0.0005777273,0.16287763,0.45940748,0.0002797825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9897251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12525173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12525173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20188446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90876913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018542365","doi":"","title":"del Courts and Federalism: Judicial Doctrine in the United States, Australia, and Canada, by Gerald Baier","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Constitution; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.020183467457516865,"score_gpt":0.2576748748221879,"score_spread":0.23749140736467106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018542365","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021912742,0.1985391,0.0007333574,0.5797199,0.0020807222,0.00003928364,0.00043368456,0.000037605878,0.19650368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53887475,0.15267436,0.0019611323,0.08167913,0.0035278876,0.00010544457,0.00026167012,0.00013261504,0.22078297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977969,0.0006125101,0.00007451766,0.00019073865,0.0008237454,0.0005016703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949522,0.0022547536,0.0002491379,0.00010710139,0.0017351328,0.0007016031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003315212,0.00052534544,0.00046675664,0.002885188,0.015215413,0.012532763,0.0018263654,0.007822526,0.0049706483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0138664385,0.00072129664,0.00041651315,0.005466163,0.014771744,0.005931044,0.0025917683,0.0075364304,0.0004202137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002382113,0.000050260907,0.0022224053,0.00006971078,0.000020001142,0.00009596859,0.009920339,0.0005608796,0.00006367817,0.6537629,0.31629586,0.016914217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034213994,0.000012544468,0.020583533,0.0009369151,0.000041430016,0.000087401415,0.019253047,0.0011736938,0.00012895133,0.21660829,0.74106914,0.00007077631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95475984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98157203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060406145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060406145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08492644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43827933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024431796","doi":"","title":"S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Canada/Attorney General of Canada v. S.D. Myers, Inc","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Subject (documents); Process (computing)","score_opus":0.008081737050039952,"score_gpt":0.15677227170643554,"score_spread":0.1486905346563956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024431796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014541414,0.005480203,0.0007116723,0.056825135,0.0007910928,0.00013216921,0.0021706775,0.00023484875,0.91911286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16070996,0.0050065024,0.0012390207,0.06045718,0.00019534217,0.0001374248,0.00096588244,0.000111154004,0.7711775],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970198,0.000121841396,0.00007240403,0.00016184768,0.0015587461,0.001065269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966433,0.00059751817,0.0001436523,0.000071231014,0.0020530622,0.00049126806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010966063,0.00070652476,0.00036978594,0.0019967526,0.01967131,0.004884295,0.0013100597,0.008028633,0.029013542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047212318,0.00088617037,0.0006069888,0.0020187208,0.0016128286,0.0014470057,0.0011021611,0.00467939,0.0049408586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005807776,0.0000388417,0.004825421,0.00006839945,0.000017401808,0.00034563054,0.0007853445,0.0001583541,0.0007458471,0.08169053,0.89780444,0.01346173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055326138,0.00004332885,0.017843544,0.00023047788,0.00008933057,0.00019508651,0.0014619508,0.00047558788,0.0011363446,0.006614663,0.9717601,0.00009432751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94344074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9872016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056559265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02529309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.063426085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18351507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043446074","doi":"","title":"Strengthening the Foundations: Modernizing the Canada Health Act","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Accountability; Commission; Government (linguistics); Good governance; Democracy; Corporate governance; Administration (probate law)","score_opus":0.031988286033578325,"score_gpt":0.23980646558934737,"score_spread":0.20781817955576903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043446074","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008070797,0.013915376,0.0032918584,0.74277407,0.0053695235,0.0002708231,0.00073589274,0.0002870097,0.22528468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29177263,0.01787242,0.016349703,0.48884046,0.0029010852,0.00033454798,0.0009693408,0.00032811947,0.18063164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96216667,0.0049771043,0.00080994616,0.001651,0.02098039,0.009414869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9594861,0.008369069,0.0010662316,0.0016788559,0.017822413,0.01157722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019128786,0.00084735866,0.0006788183,0.0035093182,0.022484725,0.016317297,0.0043444647,0.015118319,0.009399989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046917316,0.00087906455,0.001051408,0.0036122734,0.015797716,0.0064616315,0.006800533,0.014863335,0.001289103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003355062,0.00006582877,0.0018376755,0.00015828577,0.000021734353,0.0003028581,0.0034506002,0.000941198,0.0002794252,0.5488641,0.409058,0.03498671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056339108,0.000026642576,0.0049118786,0.0004145839,0.000026305022,0.00005866559,0.001886291,0.00093718973,0.00022299323,0.027174799,0.9641747,0.00010966961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99367493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7924828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20751722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5851577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9191677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7052432803","doi":"","title":"Review Essay of Judicial Power and the Charter: Canada and the Paradox of Liberal Constitutionalism, 2d ed. by Christopher J. Manfredi","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Judicial activism; Politics; Judicial review; Supreme court; Power (physics); Adjudication","score_opus":0.003665796304082378,"score_gpt":0.184748353138806,"score_spread":0.18108255683472363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7052432803","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000985423,0.37671039,0.0004382843,0.55603445,0.01446378,0.000034220986,0.00023894518,0.000031754418,0.051062737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.087613925,0.4202948,0.001134079,0.30953833,0.02892509,0.0001777212,0.0003353495,0.0001683783,0.15181233],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99249226,0.0011954757,0.00019907767,0.0005314738,0.004464988,0.0011167806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841314,0.0065082163,0.0005588104,0.00034886005,0.007684098,0.0007687096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007510933,0.00077514164,0.0010211992,0.004189662,0.016741643,0.015073455,0.0031406945,0.011082759,0.0052066925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024293542,0.0007781613,0.0006793866,0.008187016,0.018752849,0.005917026,0.0016674751,0.007191731,0.0011266716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059931526,0.000004550797,0.0001062937,0.00010369474,0.0000056531917,0.000048809165,0.0008388836,0.000088165034,0.000034454584,0.072230764,0.9182643,0.00826845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010249161,0.0000030219992,0.0009498409,0.00043033255,0.000007801815,0.000029705137,0.00096965337,0.000060422815,0.000035741003,0.0119119985,0.9855665,0.0000246971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8870025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9425255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11299747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09672642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1325274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70180255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7055691674","doi":"","title":"del Hie Impact of Law Reform: Deinstitutionalization in Law and Practice in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Action (physics); Legal practice","score_opus":0.010094388745844311,"score_gpt":0.2413294204594648,"score_spread":0.23123503171362048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7055691674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64342844,0.0023497941,0.0008778965,0.14068002,0.00033629712,0.00017626969,0.0006209115,0.000064127074,0.2114663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643423,0.0005943245,0.0002932514,0.0049072052,0.00003233313,0.000038872753,0.000084502244,0.000026982741,0.02968034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852443,0.0017899695,0.00036031994,0.0010397398,0.0038396355,0.0077260523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97133046,0.006223347,0.0014321549,0.0010080207,0.008743798,0.011262242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005731988,0.00024013291,0.00072853034,0.002387349,0.04074134,0.016005196,0.003240801,0.0050170138,0.016590456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03083327,0.00056048663,0.0005885011,0.0043909107,0.017706325,0.0037587155,0.008515763,0.008068347,0.0005957034],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026027038,0.00035060119,0.069012456,0.0001680673,0.00008991723,0.0007676615,0.074682586,0.001950727,0.00075894984,0.73225987,0.057162765,0.062536165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020592546,0.00017446924,0.25252137,0.00085167936,0.00019791462,0.000228631,0.21366571,0.005384073,0.0016249687,0.064376146,0.46041006,0.0003591212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5538983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8236153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7056698813","doi":"","title":"Federalism, Devolution & Secession: From Classical to Post-Conflict Federalism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Particle accelerators and beam dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Devolution (biology); Cooperative federalism; Accountability; Incentive; Dual federalism; New Federalism","score_opus":0.027291968338561165,"score_gpt":0.2053356848270855,"score_spread":0.17804371648852435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7056698813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098566055,0.026419852,0.036002137,0.10345634,0.0010521435,0.0000904314,0.00009869006,0.0000518122,0.7342626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982875,0.0026884656,0.0023436772,0.003604739,0.0003801922,0.00006169813,0.000027995959,0.00001989752,0.0079984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941095,0.003178046,0.000175755,0.00067496556,0.0008861194,0.0009757228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969303,0.0018164573,0.0003933022,0.00035463664,0.00033250786,0.0001728125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074424352,0.00024985874,0.00040506665,0.0023205888,0.0063439123,0.009681914,0.0014150498,0.0038357838,0.0031835774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007001637,0.00025427542,0.0005113376,0.0026901644,0.048727956,0.010558283,0.005165104,0.005890426,0.00026941724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018010185,0.000002567788,0.000078413555,0.0000056057515,7.3341454e-7,0.000015034625,0.00079103507,0.000042993066,0.0000076237784,0.99727947,0.0003614868,0.0014133594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063548728,0.0000104060255,0.00094973337,0.00008238264,0.0000033769695,0.00006399778,0.0020178272,0.00042226134,0.00009453011,0.95778966,0.038552526,0.0000069540356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008129198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008368712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013724805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013724805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004839447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099580884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7057213379","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Regionally Differentiated Entitlement to EI on Charter-Protected Canadians","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Unemployment; Charter; Disadvantage; Work (physics); Politics; Differential treatment; Temporary work","score_opus":0.018537185243093758,"score_gpt":0.22474692824486636,"score_spread":0.2062097430017726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7057213379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9309185,0.0005192137,0.00027242172,0.0043837847,0.000048814258,0.000040092174,0.0011920669,0.000027850445,0.06259722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937657,0.0001308427,0.00015398393,0.0005428951,0.000012958877,0.000009339833,0.0003195155,0.000010703475,0.0050540674],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929295,0.0006253115,0.000101545855,0.0005385477,0.0018070787,0.0039979923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910981,0.0010689051,0.0013819231,0.00058024237,0.0027393461,0.0031313058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002691247,0.00025231732,0.00043143838,0.0012761215,0.0073167086,0.0024656185,0.0017963449,0.0009029799,0.006500462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013335289,0.00016379516,0.0007474743,0.0021269468,0.0024032393,0.000655477,0.00251095,0.0012636676,0.0004477704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016053291,0.0003753996,0.8062033,0.00014487251,0.00028977776,0.0011538094,0.012852686,0.007951581,0.0037668222,0.057090238,0.023611179,0.08495508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004663456,0.0001256566,0.9608571,0.00007798975,0.00010089554,0.00009093845,0.010117594,0.0013477291,0.0006768307,0.0010316855,0.025448693,0.00007827305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9885839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04786999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04786999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05086298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34732276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7072148124","doi":"","title":"Unregulated Private Markets for Health Care in Canada? Rules of Professional Misconduct, Kickbacks to Physicians and Physician Self-Referral in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley)","topic":"Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Health care; Public health; Private sector; Health insurance; Health policy; Medical care","score_opus":0.011767264587309572,"score_gpt":0.20904257843243135,"score_spread":0.19727531384512179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7072148124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3977095,0.016260818,0.002396719,0.3704805,0.0005261365,0.00029799106,0.00398184,0.00012114938,0.20822541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96153045,0.0043168827,0.0008555662,0.014727865,0.0001745895,0.000046553138,0.00038516763,0.000028867455,0.01793409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893147,0.00075475045,0.0003497397,0.0006935256,0.003918683,0.0049685524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96693516,0.009129748,0.0045796116,0.0008075955,0.011170499,0.0073774676],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072395015,0.00031227386,0.0008523356,0.0028754906,0.016407257,0.013017494,0.0032113134,0.0061930344,0.007278789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03527481,0.00077889353,0.0007513883,0.0047185775,0.00894237,0.0035056619,0.003113263,0.0066886046,0.00027248956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022559002,0.00014301242,0.08322062,0.00019858341,0.00013868751,0.0008216419,0.0063576517,0.0041413074,0.00031248317,0.73826444,0.13485406,0.03132191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006804903,0.0001323562,0.39854753,0.0016149356,0.0006227135,0.0006030328,0.02310435,0.030055996,0.0013631596,0.18242042,0.36014277,0.0007122923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99380696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28035846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39206076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83468217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}