{"meta":{"query_hash":"cd627caa7d08","filters":{"venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation"},"cohort_total":201,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":201,"exported":201,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/cd627caa7d08","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Biodiversity+and+Conservation"},"results":[{"id":"W122935925","doi":"10.1023/a:1020812316749","title":"Biodiversity conservation and cash crop development in northern Thailand","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Cash; Cash crop; Cropping; Biodiversity; Livelihood; Business; Clearing; Agroforestry; Natural resource economics; Geography; Agricultural economics; Agriculture; Economics; Ecology; Finance; Biology","score_opus":0.06557891647434028,"score_gpt":0.20908095757764544,"score_spread":0.14350204110330517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W122935925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839445,0.0030373952,0.00010951147,0.0006213452,0.00000695324,0.000007570941,0.00008641295,0.0000032353214,0.01218309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971312,0.0013324941,0.000060783197,0.000021506388,0.000003728379,0.0000060846037,0.000019955252,8.671622e-7,0.0014234567],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996643,0.00014967016,0.000013937355,0.00002468511,0.000030711977,0.00011663574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990307,0.00034373393,0.00029661786,0.000020043399,0.0000796688,0.00022922075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041747373,0.00019550182,0.00013987315,0.0013179893,0.0021433972,0.0018519986,0.00027156444,0.00034023417,0.003285827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009139294,0.00014684125,0.00008350575,0.0039051643,0.0017344534,0.0010853146,0.0011682527,0.00039114506,0.00008472374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008306406,0.0003038634,0.71921116,0.0013910003,0.00014983186,0.011326115,0.070813015,0.0072284103,0.0040792893,0.06621523,0.0025193803,0.11593211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002198598,0.00018376745,0.8785952,0.00032176278,0.00005930635,0.0014633366,0.09439157,0.0018094782,0.0006662859,0.0051338077,0.017314311,0.00003919271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10594047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22264214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10594047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050749374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031820466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21064764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W141507795","doi":"10.1023/a:1016831916994","title":"Tree species diversity in small, tropical riparian forest fragments in Belize, Central America","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; York University; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Thicket; Biodiversity; Rainforest; Ecology; Hectare; Riparian forest; Biology; Ridge; Tree (set theory); Geography; Agroforestry; Forestry; Riparian zone; Habitat; Agriculture","score_opus":0.032372462073856356,"score_gpt":0.18398961595045565,"score_spread":0.1516171538765993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W141507795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99926275,0.00011652653,0.00003630957,0.000017724857,0.0000014768776,0.000005232162,0.00011933562,0.0000035256624,0.00043709806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995072,0.00008211799,0.0000905772,0.000015011927,0.0000018548209,0.000006558957,0.00015709373,0.0000013722005,0.00013808384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966514,0.00008740796,0.000022519516,0.00007950848,0.00004792567,0.00009748533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936503,0.00015558799,0.00018120838,0.00004351789,0.00011706243,0.00013754562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005792701,0.00019931402,0.00031803927,0.0017343218,0.0011589327,0.0006685943,0.0005821671,0.00020187558,0.0007944461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009420382,0.00023846551,0.00021479453,0.0015106242,0.0013179433,0.000590787,0.0008105329,0.00021556267,0.00006937726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003308234,0.00010068762,0.98296136,0.00005851181,0.0001451443,0.00018738568,0.0048127817,0.0005092374,0.0018897699,0.0003411849,0.00034354455,0.008319615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056837266,0.000020108808,0.9985671,0.00000495158,0.000017760232,0.000048645292,0.0009358419,0.00013490408,0.00004219747,0.000023534589,0.00019683634,0.000002389872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38694912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65230244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38694912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002472576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011294994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7693937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483478770","doi":"10.1023/a:1008943116150","title":"Farmland habitat selection of wintering lesser kestrels in a Spanish pseudosteppe: implications for conservation strategies","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Kestrel; Threatened species; Overwintering; Habitat; Ecology; Population; Geography; Forage; Agriculture; Agroforestry; Foraging; Biology; Predation","score_opus":0.01861530880954012,"score_gpt":0.21954035585047732,"score_spread":0.2009250470409372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483478770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998721,0.000015917292,0.000009793882,0.0000050372055,3.5637422e-7,4.7584103e-7,0.00001676633,1.8097649e-7,0.0000793824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99964464,0.000024972456,0.000054887532,0.000008476702,8.3676406e-7,0.0000021243538,0.00006855578,7.015737e-7,0.00019480767],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998834,0.000036498335,0.0000060268303,0.00003656554,0.000008869205,0.000028587909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972945,0.000057908466,0.000072558025,0.00001891692,0.000042088945,0.0000790489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023675643,0.00019005853,0.0002124046,0.000563035,0.00036725594,0.00032595842,0.00027467744,0.00025218865,0.0012307204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046428738,0.00008970406,0.00014478118,0.00038353284,0.0004241649,0.00024610353,0.0002559381,0.0001224279,0.00013474122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031844073,0.00010671872,0.9891628,0.000018675933,0.000038135036,0.0005035695,0.0015483935,0.00017272818,0.003767914,0.00005393166,0.00011608061,0.00419264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035074884,0.000044929817,0.9978542,0.0000031590719,0.0000056964413,0.00018209161,0.0016675893,0.00008799818,0.000033481025,0.000019496167,0.000095813804,0.0000020981593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028943682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14223161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028943682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043286785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020834325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05755043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498024763","doi":"10.1023/a:1013143503902","title":"Functional diversity and community structure of microorganisms in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere Canadian arctic soils","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhizosphere; Species evenness; Soil water; Biology; Diversity index; Bulk soil; Botany; Microorganism; Soil test; Ecology; Species diversity; Species richness; Bacteria","score_opus":0.019513997610790496,"score_gpt":0.16769339790940843,"score_spread":0.14817940029861792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498024763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99907815,0.00022551767,0.0000462078,0.000008178959,0.0000013057725,0.000003908222,0.00035293875,0.0000017295029,0.00028202616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998713,0.00022750624,0.00016117078,0.000009780085,0.0000020211257,0.0000060499215,0.00048488498,0.000002096611,0.00039360608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999303,0.000042916894,0.000023195333,0.00015229543,0.00016869821,0.00030985594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987141,0.000098497774,0.00013761684,0.000027750426,0.00070434186,0.0003176998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005833641,0.0005233505,0.0004805523,0.0031988306,0.0032210818,0.0014001096,0.00057101523,0.00042183604,0.0006612672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087801646,0.00035415785,0.00031060338,0.0026810213,0.0010356308,0.00046611705,0.0007187822,0.00028919065,0.00014234876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016554799,0.00011501378,0.8672115,0.00019749228,0.00022917743,0.0001493556,0.0059698075,0.0012039423,0.10717434,0.00033517636,0.00033673088,0.015422046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048095935,0.000039195187,0.99609655,0.000007573967,0.000024671388,0.00005304383,0.0012553296,0.00060748484,0.0013995648,0.000030164347,0.0004690417,0.000012528764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8909166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9191305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109083414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069266823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005871801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2194516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502047965","doi":"10.1023/a:1014098917535","title":"Biodiversity links above and below the marine sediment–water interface that may influence community stability","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Marine Biology and Ecology Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Detritivore; Ecology; Benthic zone; Disturbance (geology); Habitat; Environmental science; Biology; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.055313819098042526,"score_gpt":0.21407924145371257,"score_spread":0.15876542235567004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502047965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99811906,0.00008465166,0.00027806632,0.00012812433,0.000004264763,0.0000027696929,0.00007419526,0.00000654137,0.0013021898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99977547,0.000022430731,0.00006161093,0.000018120458,0.0000041200533,0.0000014232253,0.000033798344,0.0000018415268,0.000081059756],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970967,0.000079591904,0.000020954947,0.00006559113,0.000043681317,0.00008043477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824154,0.0006210081,0.00050504704,0.00007858537,0.00018431555,0.0003695246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046617814,0.00015639907,0.00035305502,0.0016705579,0.00078778755,0.001636973,0.00038855287,0.00071532617,0.0044680326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034540505,0.00023033995,0.00024507233,0.001211179,0.0011332629,0.0012283477,0.0012002536,0.00038556394,0.00020012297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003401171,0.00013645935,0.96541303,0.00008655358,0.00029310255,0.0003429691,0.0009677837,0.002356474,0.014118916,0.003524877,0.0004374393,0.011982392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072105986,0.000049798517,0.9942713,0.000007636143,0.000058708894,0.00007452743,0.0009614921,0.001617503,0.0003873657,0.002172822,0.0003803729,0.000011337819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004298951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011518264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044680326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004703657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003233927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014947057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530313662","doi":"10.1023/a:1020312108530","title":"Phylogenetic diversity and ecological features in the Egyptian flora","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rare species; Liana; Biology; Taxon; Genus; Ecology; Endemism; Flora (microbiology); Habitat; Zoology; Botany","score_opus":0.0751688981588339,"score_gpt":0.1738512878842392,"score_spread":0.0986823897254053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530313662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99914646,0.00018764389,0.000040543393,0.000013677021,5.4509303e-7,6.79959e-7,0.000026820302,8.28127e-7,0.00058267714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997408,0.00007162596,0.000058938753,0.0000033446117,0.0000013316944,5.109132e-7,0.000041459338,4.910157e-7,0.00008166215],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997917,0.00004576165,0.000015844484,0.000048971637,0.000023868282,0.00007395279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969566,0.00008262245,0.00009273639,0.00001815163,0.000056945668,0.00005394161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028966996,0.00014293716,0.00020494964,0.0031356076,0.00081208564,0.0006995388,0.00022159169,0.00020328659,0.0019920678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072357553,0.00011904754,0.0001164538,0.0024766924,0.0009463022,0.00044738263,0.00057888817,0.0001918609,0.00015557492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005640368,0.000036948426,0.9204462,0.00010341473,0.00019384883,0.0004093574,0.006877209,0.0009360763,0.015541938,0.0024830925,0.00014432147,0.05226353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025897186,0.000016936568,0.9976234,0.0000070893457,0.000012402668,0.00019781746,0.0012488927,0.00023555204,0.00010921766,0.0001867645,0.0003562319,0.0000032937721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008715977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020945217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008715977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008108145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002981173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017330527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594797209","doi":"10.1023/a:1016282023542","title":"Tree and shrub diversity and abundance in fragmented littoral forest of southeastern Madagascar","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"African Botany and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Diameter at breast height; Species richness; Floristics; Forestry; Biodiversity; Understory; Biology; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Geography; Botany; Canopy","score_opus":0.03851734325127516,"score_gpt":0.17221256123836406,"score_spread":0.1336952179870889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594797209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99976104,0.00003185627,0.0000045469815,0.0000075803437,3.187353e-7,0.0000010851442,0.000059081995,6.896162e-7,0.00013371506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997733,0.000029151353,0.000021943511,0.0000064268106,8.996357e-7,0.0000036048423,0.00008484827,4.2545213e-7,0.00007931894],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999031,0.000024069406,0.000008267628,0.000019964024,0.000011601483,0.000033100834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970055,0.00006465443,0.0001307077,0.000013995788,0.000027535396,0.00006254008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012899801,0.00014749095,0.0001624919,0.0010860038,0.00074359804,0.0005770626,0.00028384873,0.00014378813,0.0013846938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066935364,0.0001327906,0.0001440221,0.0010583567,0.0005078466,0.000283116,0.00064305495,0.00015264617,0.00008346077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008022564,0.000017717655,0.9917503,0.000019223387,0.0000429024,0.00019956348,0.0034050648,0.000068360605,0.0010027699,0.00007003073,0.00009769687,0.0032462894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012195687,0.000010195745,0.99867034,0.0000033242557,0.0000065841427,0.00005928204,0.0010559603,0.000068576606,0.00002024611,0.000007782484,0.00009534085,0.0000011367349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07318363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24063905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07318363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051497994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025296528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14551532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597727458","doi":"10.1023/a:1011871723686","title":"Area prioritization for biodiversity conservation in Québec on the basis of species distributions: a preliminary analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; University of Texas at Austin; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Biodiversity; Geography; Riparian zone; Endangered species; Wetland; Logging; Population; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Ecology; Forestry; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.026813786160588823,"score_gpt":0.20466653977244625,"score_spread":0.17785275361185743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597727458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97425735,0.0019295233,0.0028532934,0.0016519126,0.0000292707,0.0003479887,0.0030691626,0.000046813893,0.015814766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911907,0.0003520727,0.0023231371,0.00016053206,0.00000934774,0.0000623104,0.00074384746,0.000012164993,0.0051460033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863607,0.00041886957,0.000042014857,0.00013507367,0.00034909396,0.0004188518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964121,0.0011132831,0.00019768979,0.00008220982,0.0018186739,0.00037611273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017799388,0.00036261912,0.0003741598,0.0018052411,0.0017691002,0.001850485,0.0012236213,0.00043375656,0.010222497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055451742,0.0001686169,0.0005168247,0.0032208043,0.00074711465,0.0008542166,0.0005764483,0.00043405252,0.00024329594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020935307,0.0002749187,0.80293095,0.00038113576,0.0004751338,0.0007616819,0.0017551786,0.033738907,0.0036171053,0.016840942,0.018208362,0.11892215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020223478,0.00017680341,0.9322842,0.00009295044,0.00025255998,0.0001198551,0.0045207725,0.047767688,0.00082955085,0.0019510944,0.011742918,0.000059392645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98712236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034845572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034845572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025524441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25282353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1795001645","doi":"10.1023/a:1008939425511","title":"The crisis in shifting cultivation practices and the promise of agroforestry: a review of the Panamanian experience","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Deforestation (computer science); Agroforestry; Biodiversity; Agriculture; Geography; Panama; Productivity; Land use; Environmental protection; Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Ecology; Economics; Biology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.014749820404923947,"score_gpt":0.21232178447672814,"score_spread":0.1975719640718042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1795001645","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008165522,0.9762557,0.000094871495,0.011710309,0.00028125933,0.0000030724736,0.000017701346,0.0000029591934,0.0034686092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056313463,0.9410373,0.0001596442,0.0016244474,0.00035724262,0.0000055014643,0.00001603298,0.0000034291954,0.00048290277],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906856,0.00040439473,0.00009152574,0.00008753167,0.00023778445,0.000110268535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975247,0.0016375798,0.00032069226,0.00003617721,0.00037985214,0.000101072204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039648456,0.00038528504,0.0006406539,0.0016936162,0.0012582415,0.004788909,0.0007425641,0.0014055303,0.0015081248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043739183,0.00018052082,0.00019381319,0.0061717755,0.002996411,0.0027309952,0.0012736522,0.0016424154,0.00009747604],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003437322,0.00008122193,0.00859314,0.020204412,0.0002097319,0.0028813793,0.04111339,0.0010058162,0.0026642126,0.058129355,0.034415793,0.83035785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017561862,0.00011831821,0.027509404,0.007744693,0.00015143251,0.0020799176,0.040351033,0.00010870689,0.00056201895,0.0077990256,0.91349936,0.00005858528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035793036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11100773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035793036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039052705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051950533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07116938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1834110906","doi":"10.1023/a:1013141609742","title":"Bryophyte and vascular plant species richness in boreo-nemoral moist forests and mires","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Bryophyte; Species richness; Vascular plant; Ecology; Biodiversity; Mire; Biology; Wetland; Plant species; Indicator species; Species diversity; Plant community; Botany; Peat; Habitat","score_opus":0.013337947669641559,"score_gpt":0.17805524034438938,"score_spread":0.16471729267474783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1834110906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997731,0.000033992274,0.000006873694,0.0000033050023,4.828314e-7,6.204103e-7,0.000028757839,4.7880405e-7,0.0001524601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99977726,0.000025010331,0.000016108446,0.0000037830416,0.0000010183462,0.0000014295804,0.00005822523,3.5172502e-7,0.00011664892],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998319,0.00003848905,0.000011529782,0.00003164013,0.000023836212,0.00006248677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995432,0.0000732201,0.00014977067,0.000016790747,0.000037165355,0.00017983008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038509304,0.00015535744,0.00018711608,0.0009848591,0.00072807085,0.00051683455,0.00019690114,0.00014693159,0.001143766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066792086,0.00016174401,0.00014008365,0.00051831163,0.00048656858,0.00046678734,0.00057220017,0.00018871503,0.00011791323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039029552,0.000043567627,0.9919065,0.000016398646,0.00004741279,0.0001023546,0.0016108822,0.000042446514,0.0037164576,0.00009544885,0.00005334221,0.0019749096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015462505,0.000010789737,0.9993949,9.3955106e-7,0.0000043908244,0.000035550805,0.0004406959,0.000018797924,0.000032649277,0.000008487324,0.00005057359,7.1243437e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021092348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10338396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021092348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029686964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019874773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04193914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971921685","doi":"10.1007/s10531-009-9751-y","title":"Determinants of the geographical extent of invasive plants in China: effects of biogeographical origin, life cycle and time since introduction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"La Cité Collégiale","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Perennial plant; Ecology; Habitat; Biodiversity; China; Distribution (mathematics); Geography; Biology; Invasive species; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.01258127444297663,"score_gpt":0.17646159011111281,"score_spread":0.16388031566813618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971921685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992755,0.00022074446,0.00005485654,0.000034328674,0.0000012703044,0.0000016896793,0.000054432498,0.0000027241852,0.00035446242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996289,0.000076330456,0.00005027858,0.000007361348,0.0000031188194,0.0000012968358,0.000046440437,0.000001202334,0.00018511606],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999752,0.00004545832,0.0000179717,0.00008209449,0.00003138499,0.0000711021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982135,0.00040463978,0.0007293768,0.00011337753,0.00018467601,0.00035451143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000662163,0.00018181553,0.0001670717,0.0010996053,0.00040664326,0.00049534586,0.000484091,0.0002902001,0.0023469129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008990141,0.00019366875,0.00029429223,0.0010388048,0.0007678845,0.0005859383,0.00048872444,0.000296641,0.00013143399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056236073,0.000018527275,0.9927267,0.000023905252,0.000037973685,0.00012232343,0.0005435494,0.00024423873,0.0023138996,0.00022500091,0.000047906193,0.003639704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001013564,0.000008337624,0.9994342,0.0000029349653,0.000005102085,0.0000303669,0.00016995109,0.00015290937,0.000035019417,0.000043299086,0.00011507991,0.0000018542291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021774938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051956803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021774938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005989048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053927297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043296397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976060975","doi":"10.1007/s10531-012-0353-8","title":"Increased openness around retained oaks increases species richness of saproxylic beetles","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Stiftelsen Skogssällskapet; Skogforsk; Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning","keywords":"Species richness; Quercus robur; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Ecology; Deciduous; Felling; Quercus petraea; Fauna; Species diversity","score_opus":0.0339266995980383,"score_gpt":0.19481791823354674,"score_spread":0.16089121863550845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976060975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996617,0.00003264068,0.000025965583,0.000004380167,0.0000017004343,6.430957e-7,0.000011702388,0.0000027402414,0.00025857263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99962354,0.000027273973,0.000057421934,0.000014287317,0.000002838343,0.000001125405,0.000048573613,0.0000033801437,0.00022156643],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997986,0.000032468826,0.000008037173,0.000060672246,0.000035176745,0.00006513567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988992,0.0002091167,0.00029695552,0.00009072036,0.00004433183,0.00045966622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019645762,0.00021641588,0.0003940011,0.00051603984,0.00043256755,0.00086358935,0.0002890779,0.00030731354,0.0026567818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006564323,0.00027010008,0.00029065422,0.00019201593,0.00067793846,0.00039070236,0.00090709585,0.000456175,0.00018919553],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047488953,0.0009535122,0.56720287,0.00016029758,0.000568287,0.0008029033,0.0006765491,0.0009936565,0.40762958,0.00030602628,0.00043356448,0.015523877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012932454,0.00023904574,0.99671257,0.0000051521283,0.000043256845,0.00018167093,0.0002949778,0.00019164811,0.002073784,0.0000714186,0.00016860563,0.0000049066493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021689867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075810463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026567818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024767715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016318221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008887827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977548191","doi":"10.1007/s10531-007-9173-7","title":"Saproxylic beetles in artificially created high-stumps of spruce and birch within and outside hotspot areas","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Snag; Felling; Fauna; Ordination; Hotspot (geology); Biodiversity; Ecology; Geography; Forestry; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.022721668815537235,"score_gpt":0.1925206351519406,"score_spread":0.16979896633640335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977548191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997496,0.000019505296,0.00004135218,0.0000027711924,0.0000042710376,0.000006396379,0.000025943089,0.0000031780544,0.00014690908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865216,0.000023093464,0.00028034637,0.00001720385,0.0000047884573,0.000020830084,0.00014357401,0.000009697371,0.0008483241],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999559,0.000076673045,0.00002826956,0.00013091636,0.00007025347,0.0001349252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990908,0.00025065063,0.00011161073,0.000061018334,0.000062613384,0.00042326777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023308363,0.00050983205,0.00052543357,0.00049978914,0.00059022306,0.0005711069,0.00053457613,0.00060474337,0.0011184148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028537968,0.00040790194,0.0002950083,0.00018158683,0.00065944146,0.00027363244,0.0006151789,0.001210529,0.00017782632],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006081438,0.0010087842,0.0061588367,0.000050288152,0.00003771408,0.00027851338,0.00026383734,0.00069122575,0.9839458,0.00016291373,0.000042727257,0.0012779151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009909837,0.018146902,0.42897642,0.000041264455,0.00029665136,0.0009798452,0.002631713,0.014391259,0.53109777,0.0003996409,0.0019301199,0.000117426665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049859397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010245396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049859397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006807398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036172057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009913802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980263100","doi":"10.1007/s10531-012-0272-8","title":"Responses of insect pollinators and understory plants to silviculture in northern hardwood forests","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Pollinator; Understory; Biology; Silviculture; Nectar; Pollination; Ecology; Canopy; Pollen","score_opus":0.07477268682274109,"score_gpt":0.19798388786422827,"score_spread":0.12321120104148718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980263100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998938,0.000016187605,0.0000035976484,0.000003918402,3.9859782e-7,4.909846e-7,0.000008465968,2.9433477e-7,0.000072926414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997198,0.000020645515,0.0000128931215,0.0000115183775,0.0000016701327,0.0000018617236,0.00003322107,4.657315e-7,0.00019800414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998714,0.000029135783,0.0000064316473,0.000029325709,0.000016020045,0.000047761565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993044,0.00019025739,0.00016532403,0.00002391323,0.000046612353,0.000269538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027319972,0.00019865,0.00025134874,0.00037765896,0.00078779395,0.00054746546,0.00028698103,0.00031371662,0.0015026311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062701263,0.00016328899,0.00015564763,0.00023959157,0.0005578862,0.00031560985,0.00042140938,0.00025425846,0.00012842081],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012049421,0.00025137074,0.9761025,0.000040770054,0.000059317248,0.00035631136,0.0024295163,0.0002575054,0.015730321,0.000055011467,0.00009494086,0.0034176104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002534038,0.000032759777,0.99916124,0.0000014625105,0.0000039467755,0.000023307804,0.0005731437,0.000064739455,0.00009485197,0.0000115715675,0.000029170233,0.0000012167856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04131041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19093986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04131041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006999212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032292193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08213991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981117596","doi":"10.1007/s10531-014-0736-0","title":"Biodiversity and ecosystem services: lessons from nature to improve management of planted forests for REDD-plus","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Biodiversity; Deforestation (computer science); Agroforestry; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Forest ecology; Forest restoration; Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation; Forest management; Ecoforestry; Environmental resource management; Business; Ecology; Climate change; Carbon stock; Biology","score_opus":0.01085122874722753,"score_gpt":0.20889203019542527,"score_spread":0.19804080144819775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981117596","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21842875,0.019184649,0.009884968,0.6598391,0.0017625778,0.00006389447,0.0008110069,0.0001334976,0.08989161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563581,0.008284429,0.010224545,0.018699154,0.00042714126,0.000047882582,0.00016508803,0.0000652758,0.005728262],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986532,0.0005502897,0.00003689069,0.00008982748,0.00035818332,0.00031152405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99573356,0.0013602581,0.00026359624,0.00018209565,0.00091046613,0.001550054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038546696,0.0003474021,0.00034137705,0.000587178,0.0017517095,0.0040116496,0.0012449393,0.0017477666,0.006087202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00972369,0.0001558866,0.0003272269,0.0007722692,0.0026623937,0.0038167757,0.0027277428,0.003041569,0.0002360676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044177065,0.0006479151,0.08201933,0.0007871125,0.00019413832,0.00075065205,0.0058785183,0.011919552,0.002273598,0.20431203,0.13278833,0.5579871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010903514,0.00036307253,0.14745615,0.0022321348,0.00022946463,0.0004830583,0.027232409,0.010861338,0.0022330536,0.45053983,0.35811284,0.00014764769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06749993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30173483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06749993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005266275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012186123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1342141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984578406","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-3922-7","title":"Practical importance for conservation of insect diversity in China","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Ecology; Urbanization; Biology; Agriculture; Ecosystem services; Endangered species; Agroforestry; Ecosystem; Habitat; Geography","score_opus":0.04110547396357949,"score_gpt":0.2650635612110115,"score_spread":0.223958087247432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984578406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.617843,0.03770402,0.012730797,0.23779458,0.0030080634,0.00023537627,0.00056613266,0.00030303898,0.089815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97641504,0.0060410663,0.0058489065,0.003815192,0.0010521974,0.00007325273,0.00022516419,0.000013074056,0.0065160166],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931896,0.00023417403,0.000059861395,0.00008895163,0.00018748721,0.00011056915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838984,0.00023213452,0.00020921887,0.00013715989,0.00045237716,0.0005792993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020277258,0.00039581454,0.00030019964,0.00072587753,0.0013722864,0.0016264546,0.0008415358,0.0012560866,0.007496348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023136442,0.00014655993,0.00024204745,0.001002638,0.0015880694,0.0011701275,0.0013249298,0.00080712204,0.00026414366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035019434,0.00024949573,0.30296138,0.0014542552,0.00021038698,0.0023077081,0.0040220628,0.0037871576,0.015791753,0.05797514,0.047407594,0.5634828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021240623,0.00040368995,0.6678435,0.0008026649,0.00031097376,0.0014861331,0.010633014,0.005257283,0.0032296001,0.06647346,0.24323408,0.00011312429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023637462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03693853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023637462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024449574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00810819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046999753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984707903","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-3219-x","title":"Habitat Assessment, Phytosociology and Conservation of the Tunbridge Filmy-fern Hymenophyllum tunbrigense (L) Sm. in its Isolated Locations in the Vosges Mountains","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Botany and Plant Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cegep de Saint Jerome","funders":"","keywords":"Fern; Habitat; Geography; Canopy; Forestry; Ecology; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.027295870851644453,"score_gpt":0.21636518115212813,"score_spread":0.18906931030048368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984707903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998097,0.000027746237,0.000009524281,0.000005301005,3.3023744e-7,8.5141136e-7,0.00003272135,4.3788503e-7,0.00011342537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99972457,0.000018298728,0.00004364857,0.000003165241,5.5816884e-7,0.000001235959,0.00007773479,4.0919852e-7,0.0001302959],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982774,0.000056508845,0.000011808016,0.000039914932,0.000025864505,0.000038095775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997768,0.00003479094,0.00009160416,0.000016673497,0.000028578155,0.000051531762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003291458,0.00012005138,0.00011439935,0.0008479754,0.00042336603,0.00036438106,0.00035313683,0.00016519881,0.0006103849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005808239,0.00010591426,0.0000973407,0.00062240934,0.00039215595,0.0002425254,0.00040201336,0.00012460868,0.00008457989],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012025615,0.0000755776,0.986172,0.000017517777,0.000033055876,0.00018444438,0.0011724842,0.00041579377,0.0028293421,0.000084455496,0.00010837033,0.008786755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019479426,0.000021442895,0.9991918,0.0000020503937,0.00000389608,0.00003539509,0.00045957553,0.00010680882,0.00006819596,0.000010424701,0.00009755745,8.628574e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065183505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20890617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065183505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006864069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029721513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12960821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985238201","doi":"10.1007/s10531-009-9734-z","title":"Marine biodiversity at the community level: zoogeography of sharks, skates, rays and chimaeras in the southwestern Atlantic","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Zoogeography; Biodiversity; Peninsula; Geography; Ecology; Distribution (mathematics); Canonical correspondence analysis; Biogeography; Fishery; Species richness; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02329374394087821,"score_gpt":0.1947108018934985,"score_spread":0.17141705795262027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985238201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998141,0.000029361414,0.000008647367,0.000010116818,5.0820785e-7,6.9909174e-7,0.000038043305,3.1361682e-7,0.000098212186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99969375,0.00004489689,0.000029370454,0.000007149787,0.0000012833135,0.0000012356969,0.000079738864,3.4504293e-7,0.00014217402],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989474,0.000017215174,0.000009533161,0.00002523177,0.000017270984,0.00003593059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997075,0.000024678082,0.00009510542,0.0000107498745,0.000059816633,0.00010213876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018799648,0.00009894353,0.00014653185,0.0007042546,0.00050677627,0.00039418048,0.00020693248,0.00022418989,0.0010735258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033601,0.000116609925,0.00018504357,0.0006291188,0.00037372968,0.0003742183,0.00052229373,0.00015003227,0.00012608408],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033345557,0.00000935016,0.9960949,0.0000081661565,0.000016321217,0.000034475663,0.001062947,0.000029062578,0.0011056926,0.00001921073,0.00003422019,0.0015523031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.796901e-7,0.000007792248,0.9990978,0.0000016962141,0.0000022182758,0.000021374586,0.0007829685,0.00003178193,0.000011743647,0.0000039808174,0.00003750942,6.1943865e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14473675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39119953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14473675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006145551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047990936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28778863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985449030","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9022-0","title":"Biogeographic patterns of the East African coastal forest vertebrate fauna","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Endemism; Generalist and specialist species; Geography; Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Fauna; Forest ecology; Ecoregion; Biology; Habitat; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.011004850503972206,"score_gpt":0.17927142019771053,"score_spread":0.16826656969373832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985449030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993936,0.00013936458,0.000014648924,0.0000146209395,3.887003e-7,0.0000015394742,0.0000468614,4.1137395e-7,0.00038858617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994808,0.00015906413,0.000060432692,0.0000046330774,0.0000010687709,0.000002905595,0.000056798013,6.014894e-7,0.00023378192],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987614,0.000031974658,0.000012384929,0.000025824447,0.000015534313,0.000038135895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995845,0.000084391584,0.00017743866,0.000021577362,0.000073543575,0.000058541584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021849983,0.000114288574,0.00012723458,0.0018310046,0.0005828939,0.0004166263,0.00019344118,0.00016066374,0.0020453113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078683585,0.00016171996,0.00007635676,0.0020978265,0.0006609002,0.000434772,0.00044522222,0.0001333737,0.00014723915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016704599,0.000027724866,0.9690553,0.00008825451,0.000041202482,0.00023472223,0.0063272007,0.00019824266,0.0067011886,0.00063987233,0.00014831062,0.016370978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.391466e-7,0.000006923508,0.998914,0.0000056660415,0.0000025364766,0.00006809188,0.0007148023,0.000053143714,0.00004804533,0.000019556375,0.00016540718,8.9191167e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02116187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08019382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02116187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053138076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028783348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042077363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985476407","doi":"10.1007/s10531-005-3369-5","title":"On the Relationships between Ground-dwelling Spider (Araneae) Assemblages and Dead Wood in a Northern Sugar Maple Forest","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Spider; Ecology; Forest floor; Biodiversity; Fauna; Deciduous; Ordination; Coarse woody debris; Pitfall trap; Species diversity; Maple; Geography; Biology; Habitat; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.04857257927103548,"score_gpt":0.19235425609797369,"score_spread":0.1437816768269382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985476407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99984515,0.000022897451,0.000004979801,0.000004072512,2.6315348e-7,5.2603275e-7,0.000023346614,2.2802114e-7,0.00009839656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975425,0.000028023249,0.00003062892,0.00000711299,0.000001016111,0.0000013064007,0.00007437956,3.2405052e-7,0.000102925704],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984515,0.000047255147,0.000010091808,0.000028719236,0.000030469886,0.0000381865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989844,0.00042715902,0.00022596601,0.000029240293,0.00010833596,0.00022489602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033265722,0.00015557298,0.00020686975,0.00085441844,0.000727164,0.0004706633,0.0004152736,0.0002760776,0.0012520906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094960333,0.00015821429,0.00012293771,0.00079666584,0.00079333666,0.00030946662,0.00039409276,0.00025992733,0.00012870927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013191017,0.000069958485,0.99430025,0.000017245486,0.000059451806,0.00017732923,0.0014115858,0.000084384425,0.001237715,0.000047159327,0.00008461063,0.0023783194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012537969,0.000018489134,0.99893874,0.0000019386548,0.000008446049,0.00005458411,0.0008050512,0.00007517651,0.00002361355,0.000016464019,0.000054815722,0.000001506555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07913633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29542315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07913633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054955774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043649206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15735137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985655691","doi":"10.1007/s10531-013-0458-8","title":"Plantation forests, climate change and biodiversity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":313,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Climate change; Agroforestry; Deforestation (computer science); Forest management; Reforestation; Afforestation; Ecosystem services; Environmental science; Effects of global warming; Geography; Ecosystem; Ecology; Global warming; Biology","score_opus":0.032937052468817056,"score_gpt":0.1947414751658284,"score_spread":0.16180442269701134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985655691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3336462,0.25546438,0.0037949244,0.18114884,0.00185735,0.000037659735,0.0015281015,0.000070788934,0.22245179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93622994,0.05001914,0.0006294253,0.0024529982,0.0010522164,0.000015533391,0.00023483072,0.000009239409,0.009356564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999703,0.00014922599,0.0000097493985,0.000031526175,0.00004766407,0.000058818503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998804,0.00062696345,0.00025777193,0.000042588035,0.00010984579,0.00015874872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008292537,0.00021471099,0.0002163245,0.00086601323,0.0007987501,0.0033431407,0.0003436297,0.0020854839,0.016003221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002156443,0.00015934343,0.00018398568,0.002909398,0.0025531931,0.0031022956,0.00087169494,0.001115136,0.00036041564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026208183,0.00040775142,0.13637024,0.0010297647,0.0002257373,0.0006185577,0.0019604834,0.007527014,0.00076094124,0.67560196,0.044483624,0.1307518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004797907,0.00011994385,0.29485402,0.00064394355,0.00014837243,0.00061379315,0.008678108,0.004535298,0.00022209281,0.5079189,0.1821529,0.00006462277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035750534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11587571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035750534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018624567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001629775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07108492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986567617","doi":"10.1007/s10531-015-0907-7","title":"Microstructure and cyanobacterial composition of microbial mats from the High Arctic","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Microbial mat; Algal mat; Cyanobacteria; Arctic; Benthic zone; Biomineralization; Ecosystem; Ecology; Aquatic ecosystem; Environmental science; Algae; Biology; Bacteria","score_opus":0.019786815289295965,"score_gpt":0.17837438943051773,"score_spread":0.15858757414122177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986567617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991167,0.0002015603,0.000095428695,0.0000052200153,0.0000019278523,0.0000013119104,0.00016481854,0.0000018629655,0.00041117513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990344,0.00022430987,0.00015918181,0.000009450005,0.000005765203,0.000002594549,0.00023323623,0.0000033985611,0.000327696],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989176,0.000010660587,0.000010431128,0.000030790827,0.00002747783,0.000028774886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999736,0.000034561806,0.00005692532,0.000009490395,0.00011226127,0.000050670427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020172012,0.00021011496,0.00018098511,0.0015253847,0.00073309033,0.00083179487,0.00015916348,0.00025297058,0.0006084687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037643168,0.0002498335,0.00017464206,0.0007049852,0.0004094533,0.00029851432,0.00038008502,0.00015327304,0.00019415576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045744085,0.000033120225,0.64629745,0.00008908566,0.00014130573,0.00020942888,0.0014418333,0.000629175,0.34173906,0.00018264954,0.00008782671,0.008691613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014767676,0.000024765865,0.9940275,0.0000050456947,0.0000217516,0.00013574658,0.00048183242,0.00029530044,0.0046978807,0.000023857563,0.00028106244,0.0000038288913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037212767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058016825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037212767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046921105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040944506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07399231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987641427","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0187-9","title":"Do Australian graziers have an offset mindset about their farm trees?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Agroforestry; Woodland; Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Incentive; Business; Agriculture; Geography; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Ecosystem; Ecology; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.05453632459415925,"score_gpt":0.20997648198058302,"score_spread":0.15544015738642378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987641427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96493804,0.00038893527,0.00021015084,0.009834798,0.00007015608,0.000007304542,0.000024850475,0.000004109926,0.0245217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99378234,0.00016804102,0.00011025171,0.0016031697,0.000015346832,0.0000049651157,0.000011193972,0.0000027671163,0.0043018865],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986186,0.000497383,0.000029508406,0.00009716304,0.00038364466,0.00037368154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936971,0.0013085295,0.0017785192,0.00035612137,0.0010265551,0.00183323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029135912,0.00013996402,0.00025183425,0.00042918924,0.0028361578,0.0021473977,0.000541172,0.0014413017,0.007134148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012025987,0.0003066679,0.0001865444,0.0004263253,0.0035712416,0.0016771859,0.0010826157,0.002180352,0.0006103893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005388416,0.00054823555,0.7614341,0.00019028471,0.00014894312,0.000979632,0.13203157,0.00017916827,0.002507167,0.010688322,0.013019179,0.077734746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002434948,0.00017743796,0.87602776,0.0001520911,0.000053946824,0.00049123564,0.09348934,0.00030200405,0.0002611435,0.0045193573,0.024457252,0.000044148266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078615695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18588024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078615695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002267306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018367863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15631622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988199335","doi":"10.1007/s10531-010-9891-0","title":"Environmental predictors of forest expansion on open coastal barrens","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Pine barrens; Edaphic; Vegetation (pathology); Foredune; Ecology; Coastal plain; Habitat; Biodiversity; Geography; Shore; Geology; Soil water; Biology","score_opus":0.008875229688859235,"score_gpt":0.17906694485697458,"score_spread":0.17019171516811535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988199335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996822,0.000022217306,0.000011046012,0.000014037745,0.0000010840264,5.569265e-7,0.00004992405,7.497418e-7,0.00021814747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960953,0.000032200292,0.000015507423,0.000005258152,0.0000040249156,0.0000010860169,0.00010969246,9.842863e-7,0.00022159416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988544,0.000025336378,0.0000073242554,0.000018957078,0.00001664109,0.00004632521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985258,0.0004154786,0.00041528925,0.00006218414,0.00013039981,0.0004509625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032364312,0.00013798909,0.00017135573,0.00068206654,0.00050720177,0.0007069835,0.0002656271,0.0003677978,0.0027795502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011450558,0.00014348477,0.00018668071,0.0007675612,0.000535063,0.00038324684,0.00058910716,0.00044625707,0.00022993995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000995261,0.000028851378,0.99804425,0.0000033909894,0.000019763185,0.00005103668,0.0001414129,0.00030335068,0.00032825436,0.00005018892,0.00006631569,0.0008635655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013104883,0.000009592708,0.99921834,0.0000022288352,0.0000035991427,0.000023853978,0.00034493316,0.00025146516,0.000017679871,0.000027384844,0.000098076554,0.000001487644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050004408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20606023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050004408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035243458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032529872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09942675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991282983","doi":"10.1023/b:bioc.0000006503.90980.e8","title":"Rain forest ‘conservation-through-use’? Chambira palm fibre extraction and handicraft production in a land-constrained community, Peruvian Amazon","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Agroforestry; Handicraft; Amazon rainforest; Livelihood; Deforestation (computer science); Palm; Geography; Production (economics); Biodiversity; Scarcity; Peasant; Business; Agriculture; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.07019933547807808,"score_gpt":0.2839986666618003,"score_spread":0.2137993311837222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991282983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99894565,0.000060728747,0.000014242446,0.00018692664,3.1497876e-7,0.0000020485716,0.000017676426,3.4433916e-7,0.0007720545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999772,0.00005209502,0.000021443033,0.000013201614,0.0000010252537,0.000001826383,0.000008589422,2.484609e-7,0.00012949982],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999762,0.000111529465,0.000008850984,0.00002804376,0.000016897258,0.000072738934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991235,0.0002973586,0.00037068146,0.000039211023,0.000062454405,0.00010690964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003670989,0.00013744464,0.00016275178,0.0005481743,0.0012419027,0.00093738653,0.00035657425,0.000348627,0.002709455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017885461,0.00014954922,0.00008185272,0.001177002,0.0014069739,0.0009117624,0.0009849679,0.0002744225,0.000060385355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014552138,0.00012254583,0.93776995,0.00007347061,0.00006159928,0.0013303157,0.044676747,0.00017356669,0.001538984,0.002813528,0.00033820228,0.010955638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000089837295,0.000051442836,0.947817,0.000018323835,0.000025325071,0.000377442,0.04954802,0.00023825477,0.00012677713,0.0004948384,0.001287597,0.0000059684153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07735733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27663314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07735733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083095394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060523924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15381408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992554146","doi":"10.1023/b:bioc.0000019403.26948.55","title":"Influence of habitat and microhabitat on epigeal spider (Araneae) assemblages in four stand types","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Linyphiidae; Epigeal; Ecology; Habitat; Spider; Deciduous; Coarse woody debris; Biodiversity; Fauna; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.02205999752465389,"score_gpt":0.19722621269735047,"score_spread":0.17516621517269657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992554146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99979764,0.000020311303,0.000012339676,0.0000031017073,6.1626105e-7,6.9485486e-7,0.000021899825,7.6953484e-7,0.00014262473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997714,0.000013605973,0.000035887468,0.000005067751,0.0000013576803,0.0000017786731,0.00004979232,0.0000010259828,0.00012009846],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971205,0.00009412153,0.000021669497,0.000053351327,0.000037519058,0.00008124112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988016,0.00044608224,0.00019122298,0.000045488883,0.00010748879,0.0004081451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040126216,0.00021554704,0.00026539472,0.000838465,0.00061360607,0.00082707766,0.00029619393,0.0002723288,0.0021772822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009936104,0.00018679057,0.00026680378,0.000445854,0.0006335688,0.0003243579,0.0006308327,0.00028670396,0.0002098791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051622663,0.000113996306,0.98384446,0.00002089749,0.00010857362,0.00014822306,0.0005101423,0.00016972657,0.010596749,0.00010755182,0.00007947592,0.0037838772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004000658,0.00007207928,0.9991333,0.0000018007116,0.000016116996,0.00006104416,0.00037677592,0.00015373454,0.00010033717,0.00002563743,0.00005331175,0.0000019566794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0083706835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0644759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0083706835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039749796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026817125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016643941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992991671","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-9995-1","title":"How functional is functional? Ecological groupings in terrestrial animal ecology: towards an animal functional type approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Ecology; Biology; Trait; Functional ecology; Categorization; Habitat; Computer science; Ecosystem; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07582659100109937,"score_gpt":0.20594865057566364,"score_spread":0.13012205957456427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992991671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6629553,0.006399188,0.25898722,0.01581108,0.00037876837,0.00017923226,0.0004110496,0.0001566043,0.054721538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699387,0.0006863881,0.027492812,0.00065422134,0.00018609937,0.00006486132,0.0001261347,0.000049730563,0.0008011798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970366,0.0018741541,0.00014461763,0.00040965027,0.0003625213,0.00017251461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911169,0.003656889,0.0013179309,0.0016331427,0.0011646217,0.0011105015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056816544,0.0005404521,0.0010185854,0.0066568847,0.0020630606,0.004951417,0.0020362681,0.0016241426,0.0025185056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008646025,0.00055471837,0.0011118541,0.0036941494,0.018456113,0.0100503145,0.003421031,0.0022319325,0.00044662904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038497278,0.00033348944,0.22386661,0.0006683734,0.00049711735,0.0003153363,0.02780199,0.0051508793,0.0059799356,0.5609373,0.0031060518,0.17095797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028386748,0.00015609823,0.178523,0.00024059182,0.00019260564,0.001063173,0.022354232,0.01025889,0.0004448006,0.77718127,0.009479962,0.000077056546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025793482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004238161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066568847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016254499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011758511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030047774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997080100","doi":"10.1007/s10531-010-9914-x","title":"Plant diversity in wooded moderate-rich fens across boreal western Canada: an ecoregional perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; MacEwan University","funders":"Natural Resources Canada","keywords":"Ecoregion; Vascular plant; Bryophyte; Species richness; Ecology; Boreal; Wetland; Biodiversity; Geography; Ordination; Taiga; Species diversity; Nestedness; Indicator species; Environmental science; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.02180717416264833,"score_gpt":0.21499542786322537,"score_spread":0.19318825370057705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997080100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99700934,0.00078281935,0.000058951977,0.000087373664,0.0000021553024,0.000006018557,0.0005639651,0.0000039194438,0.0014855477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864274,0.00033957232,0.0001223644,0.000027611915,0.0000016538465,0.0000028349632,0.00023349193,0.000002565011,0.00062709337],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996474,0.00002919183,0.0000110523815,0.000069373746,0.00006215575,0.00018077741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914134,0.000060803588,0.00010816467,0.000021418617,0.0004074723,0.0002607911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000413456,0.00022536369,0.00037396513,0.002784879,0.0027103738,0.001525516,0.0007334712,0.00026875688,0.001136995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068628555,0.00017938988,0.0002812583,0.003873177,0.0011432688,0.00044426217,0.00080846366,0.0003413899,0.00007641153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001811719,0.00002726203,0.97500515,0.00007043342,0.0001124242,0.00028493645,0.0072594243,0.00034932425,0.002589158,0.0006553329,0.0006164993,0.0128488755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012630352,0.000005707681,0.9957522,0.000016345179,0.000013524628,0.00005887624,0.003286474,0.00008922706,0.000061515224,0.00004443284,0.000664618,0.000005750516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9888648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011533883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011533883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009821376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08368456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998862125","doi":"10.1007/s10531-009-9588-4","title":"Non-random sampling and its role in habitat conservation: a comparison of three wetland macrophyte sampling protocols","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Wetland; Macrophyte; Marsh; Habitat; Ecology; Biodiversity; Quadrat; Transect; Environmental science; Diversity index; Waterfowl; Bay; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.04296052915157061,"score_gpt":0.25999482995408824,"score_spread":0.21703430080251762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998862125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5303145,0.002125402,0.4373768,0.0003722101,0.00019662415,0.021443306,0.000602374,0.0003758255,0.0071930187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5380931,0.0017441905,0.43107188,0.00047085035,0.000084637366,0.023213174,0.0007936463,0.00020446927,0.0043240986],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.93151426,0.048491813,0.005686059,0.0026406546,0.010727175,0.0009400335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9031156,0.064390264,0.0052430565,0.014373095,0.011482202,0.0013958362],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.077036254,0.0005151046,0.0011278323,0.0014506647,0.0011225668,0.00089397014,0.002485294,0.00088687957,0.0018661568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07891236,0.00074458186,0.0006757259,0.0015349479,0.0020648392,0.0010869214,0.001709068,0.0007902194,0.00048950635],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.028465446,0.005015943,0.13200243,0.0027022853,0.0014059633,0.00026790056,0.009622068,0.013770338,0.05462152,0.009065397,0.0028796077,0.740181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0071547525,0.042192154,0.67970735,0.00129601,0.0034939183,0.0026899327,0.006821652,0.09621637,0.10626669,0.014721208,0.038556084,0.00088395877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006516171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012469208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92296374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012932855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029968638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40741152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005308606","doi":"10.1007/s10531-012-0255-9","title":"Can bison play a role in conserving habitat for endangered sandhills species in Canada?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Lethbridge","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Innovates","keywords":"Endangered species; Threatened species; Habitat; Biodiversity; Ecology; Geography; Sandhill; Disturbance (geology); Trampling; Wildlife; Ecosystem; Agroforestry; Grazing; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.015281509124544292,"score_gpt":0.1851559433691234,"score_spread":0.1698744342445791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005308606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93079937,0.003299342,0.00028019195,0.016317427,0.00014083025,0.000020772344,0.0003088402,0.000019449266,0.04881376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98619825,0.0012744819,0.0003411456,0.0014506012,0.000014194989,0.000005418748,0.000054641576,0.0000068756153,0.0106543675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955934,0.00004708453,0.000006767262,0.000037895195,0.000076416334,0.00027248397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982608,0.00012477627,0.00015581082,0.000030304387,0.0005440951,0.0008843378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067419437,0.00023879224,0.00021250406,0.0008168646,0.0050565596,0.0019441351,0.0009908514,0.0008515685,0.0069886595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021556614,0.00015699344,0.00014940811,0.0008293873,0.0028533484,0.0011231129,0.00083082845,0.00063421397,0.0002927668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054428744,0.00015882596,0.82087564,0.0002326407,0.00011800378,0.0006362433,0.011686041,0.000864772,0.0024770605,0.01676288,0.021368865,0.12427465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027406657,0.00007707234,0.8646491,0.0005675692,0.00013670318,0.00031301612,0.0478766,0.0008920856,0.0006795032,0.003375769,0.08135348,0.000051554875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9823251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017674923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013231622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02296058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09600258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006296064","doi":"10.1007/s10531-008-9539-5","title":"Species richness, abundance, rarity and environmental gradients in coastal barren vegetation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Lichen and fungal ecology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Vascular plant; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Sphagnum; Lichen; Plant community; Bog; Moss; Ordination; Abundance (ecology); Biodiversity; Geography; Environmental science; Peat; Biology","score_opus":0.021841786151804748,"score_gpt":0.16045828238454182,"score_spread":0.13861649623273709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006296064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998617,0.000028051289,0.000006936834,0.0000027658843,1.7621912e-7,3.1163626e-7,0.000013691239,3.705013e-7,0.00008603446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998493,0.000017840539,0.000016660591,0.0000019879953,4.886054e-7,0.0000010318798,0.000026492506,2.783663e-7,0.000085902786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986327,0.000034509423,0.000013040255,0.000036623293,0.000020867363,0.000031767235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932027,0.00024152329,0.00017069446,0.00003096,0.000055841745,0.00018071602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033108224,0.00008523621,0.00015502301,0.0009289865,0.0005655998,0.00054573186,0.000258437,0.00021537223,0.0013546828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010474459,0.0001622731,0.00009617007,0.00079993263,0.00076107087,0.0004107996,0.00065994664,0.0001664268,0.00011588099],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021204413,0.00002585442,0.9934691,0.000018680726,0.000034696262,0.000090608584,0.0014991852,0.00017865139,0.0024185653,0.00009247617,0.000031875174,0.0019281952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016962397,0.000012788201,0.9992291,0.000001921842,0.0000037581076,0.000030390216,0.0005376627,0.00010596298,0.000020364827,0.000022065833,0.000032849694,0.0000013249515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027857006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11246983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027857006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037799374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020452349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055389702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006686729","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0002-7","title":"Developing MPA performance indicators with local stakeholders’ input in the Pacific Rim National Park Reserve, Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Parks Canada; University of Victoria","keywords":"Stakeholder; Performance indicator; National park; Environmental resource management; Identification (biology); Business; Marine protected area; Process (computing); Corporate governance; Process management; Biodiversity; Computer science; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.07552531353833879,"score_gpt":0.1812006626877963,"score_spread":0.10567534914945752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006686729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98710966,0.00022293892,0.0014677335,0.00056185987,0.000011415728,0.00032744938,0.0016181585,0.000041630203,0.008639204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921008,0.00019449633,0.004807114,0.000040432176,0.0000027016974,0.00017295036,0.0009903059,0.000013358367,0.0016777309],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748874,0.00067089923,0.00013954313,0.00019742853,0.0009619096,0.0005414603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920995,0.0010379436,0.0006134721,0.00020395654,0.005114564,0.00093050394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059644966,0.00046636237,0.00039982912,0.0024462848,0.0028016544,0.0026090415,0.0014741073,0.0003462934,0.00088912045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013457592,0.00034727162,0.00028663702,0.0052449233,0.00069621875,0.0010700006,0.0015654735,0.0006721994,0.000119019045],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026628497,0.00032667408,0.86733764,0.00025230405,0.00018049027,0.0003195158,0.007852775,0.010576017,0.00081728434,0.0021201351,0.008462342,0.101488546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034828838,0.00011159032,0.9493554,0.00018560601,0.0001107817,0.000037674145,0.023762839,0.019370325,0.0011198067,0.00039256236,0.005473709,0.00004495115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99086624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040491987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040491987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05165598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2937913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006973360","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-6905-9","title":"Population trends and calling phenology of anuran populations surveyed in Ontario estimated using acoustic surveys","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Species richness; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Phenology; Ecology; Biodiversity; Geography; Local extinction; Population; Habitat; Biological dispersal; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.07715162688704062,"score_gpt":0.25372107744079025,"score_spread":0.17656945055374962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006973360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986382,0.00004804934,0.000062154024,0.000016862756,8.2293207e-7,0.000004900364,0.00039288754,0.000004150338,0.0008320266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974275,0.00013014018,0.00021265444,0.000010976341,0.000001635577,0.000007954289,0.00042793617,0.0000022083668,0.0017788655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998373,0.000012141215,0.000012339141,0.000033237262,0.000056430006,0.00004850904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910164,0.000093820025,0.00024902148,0.000024108305,0.00035005345,0.00018133363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001903988,0.00010992509,0.0001134368,0.00083382445,0.00071297784,0.00033603678,0.0002686895,0.00012062307,0.0010527209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072667794,0.0001643634,0.0001164789,0.0009834418,0.00035936746,0.0002703603,0.00027615158,0.00018160485,0.00013613989],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077874654,0.000013657193,0.98870146,0.00002181995,0.00001728848,0.000045303786,0.0021546981,0.00015026459,0.0019491765,0.00004403948,0.00028544213,0.0065390593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.006559e-7,0.000010140722,0.99895406,0.0000022772506,0.000004690599,0.000017675668,0.0005449652,0.00007275263,0.00006047087,0.0000037945435,0.00032679987,0.0000015048033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8941489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97989815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105851114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034663314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022624193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21294892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008009932","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0148-3","title":"The efficacy of common species as indicators: avian responses to disturbance in British Columbia, Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Guild; Common species; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Abundance (ecology); Biodiversity; Biology; Species diversity; Rare species; Relative species abundance; Habitat","score_opus":0.011031559973794448,"score_gpt":0.1711309428886446,"score_spread":0.16009938291485015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008009932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967179,0.00066583685,0.00009584343,0.00029792328,0.00001300206,0.000019916755,0.0005440788,0.000006366051,0.001639197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975873,0.0003707426,0.00017800168,0.000071510396,0.0000031310358,0.000008924571,0.00025303362,0.0000047795256,0.0015225357],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990553,0.0002029875,0.00006651499,0.0001537234,0.00029662036,0.00022482428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99264467,0.000905897,0.00087361754,0.0002106294,0.003905821,0.0014593357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015960307,0.0003257618,0.00039236594,0.0014778388,0.00304738,0.0014195936,0.0015612139,0.0005600821,0.0013667197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005075402,0.00037238043,0.00020581187,0.0027075189,0.0015823465,0.00046937296,0.00084325275,0.00077533117,0.00017830906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020040796,0.00006771472,0.98132944,0.00006556767,0.00011288493,0.00012905433,0.002035884,0.0007753069,0.0006005122,0.00014409632,0.0018082703,0.0127310185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000104723795,0.000017753418,0.99544805,0.00003312754,0.000031303,0.00003405711,0.0028054942,0.00055534753,0.00014580888,0.000034600256,0.00086988945,0.000013959744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026896518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026896518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020438276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19514883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010866774","doi":"10.1007/s10531-014-0840-1","title":"Combining phytolith analysis with historical ecology to reveal the long-term, local-scale dynamics within a savannah-forest landscape mosaic","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Archaeology and ancient environmental studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; Université de Sherbrooke; University of Guelph; University of British Columbia","funders":"Nature; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; Nature Conservancy","keywords":"Phytolith; Vegetation (pathology); Historical ecology; Ecology; Biodiversity; Geography; Physical geography; Range (aeronautics); Mosaic; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.009308622137184823,"score_gpt":0.16746018706513624,"score_spread":0.1581515649279514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010866774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903509,0.000523825,0.0065580127,0.00004799365,0.000008589554,0.000010331399,0.0005895806,0.000080981066,0.0018297158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99598444,0.00009767574,0.0032380393,0.000012108833,0.000009347109,0.000008115164,0.00041868087,0.00001825071,0.00021341424],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988043,0.00002806415,0.000008925138,0.000042807253,0.000015674415,0.000023986027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999413,0.00017625507,0.00013737261,0.00008454867,0.00010387146,0.000084924286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041517607,0.00014575482,0.00028177013,0.0041919025,0.00052859273,0.0010152294,0.00027757406,0.0003365292,0.0017342024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089625164,0.00017851523,0.00035188938,0.0048163487,0.0003960625,0.00095938484,0.00062920304,0.00026362736,0.0002867231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011849475,0.000070232476,0.9109725,0.00012215886,0.00037967967,0.00017084184,0.00097567996,0.0028611007,0.026108135,0.00096413406,0.0005528138,0.0567042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038836542,0.00002533021,0.9857305,0.000009784777,0.00006361362,0.00012906543,0.0006413603,0.011079789,0.0005094822,0.00085119397,0.000943977,0.000012063382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012571636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045591615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012571636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041907426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002911479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024996936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020008633","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9039-4","title":"Unsustainable collection and unfair trade? Uncovering and assessing assumptions regarding Central Himalayan medicinal plant conservation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Resource (disambiguation); Medicinal plants; Agroforestry; Biodiversity; Business; Plant species; Biodiversity conservation; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Government (linguistics); Environmental resource management; Geography; Agriculture; Economics; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.011027714807505749,"score_gpt":0.18025353494644691,"score_spread":0.16922582013894116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020008633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9542281,0.00070979283,0.006135052,0.0141988415,0.000034065535,0.000056013305,0.00013385351,0.000011223449,0.024492996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993067,0.00008455282,0.00033724983,0.00015498848,0.00001950562,0.0000054212383,0.000011891703,0.0000017887238,0.00007790693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933739,0.0037724788,0.0002814069,0.00072700443,0.001039175,0.0008061854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7852243,0.1721722,0.026017841,0.008336577,0.0065563903,0.0016927425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021206765,0.00038117543,0.0005406587,0.0017153282,0.0029062652,0.007350275,0.002463668,0.0029241478,0.0041163107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12185291,0.0003780981,0.00041455412,0.0019925192,0.015200465,0.010273329,0.0028647236,0.0034971084,0.00018294064],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018664706,0.0004283184,0.29439905,0.00044608038,0.00048536086,0.0015013275,0.0203705,0.0376621,0.0010250694,0.5840782,0.0018182999,0.055919226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000652246,0.00021444162,0.16110273,0.00037153016,0.00022785891,0.00044097836,0.039111774,0.07511813,0.0015681443,0.71671104,0.004964403,0.00010378881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014428989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015243589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021206765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066776173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036881946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11215341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020507731","doi":"10.1007/s10531-008-9445-x","title":"Trends and prospects for local knowledge in ecological and conservation research and monitoring","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":274,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Traditional knowledge; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Process (computing); Geography; Environmental planning; Agriculture; Indigenous; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.23733203477087458,"score_gpt":0.40505115333829084,"score_spread":0.16771911856741625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020507731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4486546,0.20566046,0.0055415626,0.2853281,0.0014945769,0.00022799998,0.0039876522,0.00027656188,0.04882846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8963632,0.074930176,0.006004568,0.009969254,0.0018715593,0.00020122713,0.0019279348,0.000032338783,0.008699706],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957343,0.0016503901,0.00051509414,0.00054955634,0.00077483716,0.0007758954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.932905,0.03324694,0.008479921,0.0015869995,0.016076658,0.0077044666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01932364,0.00021234607,0.00071527506,0.0050896113,0.001638534,0.0048150965,0.00147476,0.0022949064,0.01766983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02390044,0.00034625045,0.00044991612,0.010796646,0.0032085977,0.009781479,0.0018735602,0.002613183,0.0012217683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011055347,0.00063925626,0.37697065,0.005290542,0.00013625306,0.00020343585,0.013017278,0.0005887925,0.0029895522,0.016727863,0.030912805,0.55141807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010861665,0.0007845521,0.76581883,0.0030346834,0.00026077332,0.0007886239,0.055471703,0.001601232,0.001085905,0.011895415,0.15899532,0.0001542909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030596998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037910655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030596998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035707226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007288846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10219437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022195842","doi":"10.1007/s10531-015-0880-1","title":"Paleoecology and fire history of Garry oak ecosystems in Canada: implications for conservation and environmental management","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Parks Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Ecosystem; Climate change; Geography; Ecology; Fire regime; Paleoecology; Disturbance (geology); Endangered species; Biodiversity; Novel ecosystem; Vegetation (pathology); Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.01784695105911444,"score_gpt":0.16763423285970036,"score_spread":0.14978728180058593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022195842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968375,0.0009265663,0.00004838883,0.00032938967,0.0000050091844,0.0000057823636,0.00056242646,0.000003849138,0.0012811692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980927,0.00060924113,0.00010436682,0.00006662554,0.0000030888796,0.0000026712503,0.00033525794,0.00000388615,0.0007820223],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974424,0.000023045548,0.00001023526,0.000041822488,0.000058139303,0.00012247718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991229,0.00008340852,0.00013731023,0.000024421637,0.000322754,0.00030914487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046782722,0.00016877985,0.00027231814,0.0017358003,0.0028533633,0.0016881226,0.0008051444,0.0004384617,0.0023393233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013927016,0.0002045543,0.00024160084,0.0032135686,0.0014225114,0.00058520294,0.00082823733,0.0005139183,0.00012996538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017388533,0.00004269057,0.9716585,0.000067435365,0.00010323254,0.00021917299,0.004883113,0.00044421936,0.0014251553,0.0007571845,0.00101057,0.01921479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020500602,0.0000032472308,0.9961771,0.00002023281,0.000007894456,0.000038708444,0.0025501058,0.00016376695,0.0000407654,0.00006336036,0.0009272523,0.0000055393293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020857079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020857079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019493816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1513294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023022648","doi":"10.1007/s10531-012-0392-1","title":"When invasive exotic populations are threatened with extinction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Foundation for Dietetic Research","keywords":"Threatened species; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Introduced species; Invasive species; Biology; Ecology; Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Population; Sympatric speciation; Habitat","score_opus":0.050933701931255605,"score_gpt":0.19610776933964108,"score_spread":0.14517406740838548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023022648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93006337,0.0013901934,0.0017537376,0.00474831,0.00035342667,0.00004003701,0.00034223418,0.000086354754,0.061222315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962286,0.00036728743,0.0005769063,0.0005987503,0.00011561599,0.00001161423,0.0002115756,0.000015359014,0.0018742639],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987692,0.0002483679,0.00013240275,0.00020253996,0.00031249583,0.00033488646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926964,0.0020405327,0.0026472013,0.000425587,0.0009896398,0.0012006613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00218528,0.00022488931,0.00040314838,0.001436354,0.0012291061,0.003306834,0.0005444473,0.0013682871,0.0086764125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013547728,0.00018215667,0.0003185782,0.00069291535,0.0015465904,0.0024214229,0.0016541673,0.0012268651,0.0006050147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006427181,0.00014370799,0.91195965,0.00023470796,0.00018240903,0.005260943,0.0018093592,0.0012671439,0.0023526386,0.0073732883,0.010015878,0.058757674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043271015,0.0003933014,0.89808637,0.00034093394,0.00019110175,0.01710521,0.019929588,0.003019793,0.0013768342,0.02780306,0.031649865,0.000060593247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017731915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007047513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0086764125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000792042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005336616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029025495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023787385","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9141-7","title":"A comparison of some population density sampling techniques for biodiversity, conservation, and environmental impact studies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transect; Stratified sampling; Sampling (signal processing); Distance sampling; Biodiversity; Reef; Index of dispersion; Quarter (Canadian coin); Statistics; Population density; Point (geometry); Systematic sampling; Population; Environmental science; Geography; Physical geography; Ecology; Mathematics; Biology; Computer science; Geometry; Demography","score_opus":0.05810468545141796,"score_gpt":0.30148898238608085,"score_spread":0.2433842969346629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023787385","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17701134,0.009841018,0.801119,0.0006460477,0.0003279859,0.0014595304,0.0014360414,0.0006301667,0.0075288275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2145456,0.0070257736,0.7730114,0.00029247432,0.00013073802,0.0013461893,0.0006963905,0.00022027006,0.0027311556],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833503,0.010290135,0.000841788,0.000952529,0.004364343,0.00020090608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93764037,0.047305938,0.0016851758,0.0034408565,0.009538535,0.00038914435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020549169,0.00074391585,0.0011042709,0.0050051855,0.0010084247,0.0008199398,0.0025311306,0.0011650842,0.0014495531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03892112,0.00069837377,0.0010637966,0.003638864,0.0008905593,0.0012789188,0.0008456023,0.0009445498,0.0004214847],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019841779,0.00039522888,0.11752392,0.0018508333,0.0007147735,0.00014355553,0.0029757884,0.0044521233,0.020864822,0.006039878,0.0019683181,0.8410866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000859483,0.007331598,0.6671532,0.0015371323,0.0035212918,0.0064703464,0.005750517,0.13037267,0.10054999,0.017470911,0.058246706,0.00073617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012802657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027422711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020549169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011846218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009744183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10867566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024549478","doi":"10.1007/s10531-005-4317-0","title":"Assessment of Extinction Risk and Reasons for Decline in Sturgeon","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Biological Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Acipenser; Sturgeon; Beluga; Fishery; Huso; Geography; Endangered species; Fish migration; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.011598117007413276,"score_gpt":0.21310163471283822,"score_spread":0.20150351770542493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024549478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999292,0.000106368076,0.00009718472,0.00004600283,0.000001056806,0.0000030591102,0.000039487135,0.0000028283348,0.00041199155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953973,0.000052645566,0.0001299984,0.000012948288,0.0000020492444,0.0000031287352,0.00008887342,0.0000010344646,0.00016969645],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996828,0.00013008025,0.000029555858,0.000049486083,0.000071888484,0.00003624369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877864,0.00053492887,0.0003193845,0.00004681332,0.00021994753,0.00010036002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019445294,0.00027460308,0.00016876648,0.0010324218,0.0003034715,0.000453217,0.00039916096,0.0004707149,0.00094712526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035054518,0.00011965207,0.0004289293,0.00039889812,0.0003353749,0.0005473674,0.00033058075,0.000253055,0.000093428105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073535345,0.00011558946,0.97733283,0.000041225536,0.00015695133,0.00019628592,0.00029936509,0.0025273634,0.0015232803,0.00030672457,0.00021214827,0.016553007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015179425,0.00033315274,0.9915936,0.000012615956,0.00008721738,0.0002635699,0.00043145125,0.0060330112,0.0004073613,0.0005094654,0.0003058167,0.00000764801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006915886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014514394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006915886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084466976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029387168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013751268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024929836","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-3913-8","title":"The importance of littoral forest remnants for indigenous bird conservation in southeastern Madagascar","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rio Tinto; Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government","keywords":"Littoral zone; Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Threatened species; Endemism; Biodiversity; Deforestation (computer science); Old-growth forest; Biodiversity hotspot; Secondary forest; Agroforestry; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.01661087153167963,"score_gpt":0.2150037717367396,"score_spread":0.19839290020505995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024929836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991372,0.00008900206,0.000009715173,0.000050623756,0.0000010538256,0.0000019605052,0.000024922627,8.05826e-7,0.000684592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99976426,0.00006360137,0.000032890017,0.000008530693,0.0000016274779,0.000002408254,0.000020289348,4.0949078e-7,0.0001059412],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999094,0.000026512394,0.000006250768,0.000011623816,0.000010765907,0.000035581666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994424,0.00013161598,0.00023990445,0.000025353522,0.00005655849,0.000104092374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022956208,0.00009463112,0.000097066986,0.00065316225,0.0010958476,0.0006532229,0.00028265588,0.00011993995,0.001756202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011667713,0.000076921024,0.000073673,0.0006010643,0.00073890574,0.0004017077,0.00074381306,0.00015936622,0.000046930185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009880224,0.000026067826,0.9702829,0.000077967525,0.00002770511,0.00076629146,0.008576731,0.00011796897,0.0016480489,0.0005847462,0.00035919267,0.017433697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015789922,0.000021363263,0.99111134,0.000019386562,0.000011245738,0.00020487512,0.007722979,0.00011340919,0.000057594458,0.000046198587,0.0006876926,0.0000022451015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06844028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29066557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06844028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005311222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048876944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13608384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029402545","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-0255-5","title":"Habitat Islands, Forest Edge and Spring-active Invertebrate Assemblages","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Clearcutting; Habitat; Ecology; Old-growth forest; Epigeal; Secondary forest; Biodiversity; Fauna; Geography; Forest management; Biology","score_opus":0.023832503355623258,"score_gpt":0.18783083236316916,"score_spread":0.1639983290075459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029402545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99927145,0.00011936317,0.00005210008,0.000009747533,0.0000016108428,0.0000013997127,0.00008928744,0.000001619027,0.0004533688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99934596,0.00005318896,0.0000913699,0.0000053977924,0.0000026564342,0.0000026383268,0.00010507359,0.0000026021687,0.00039107635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999848,0.000049247166,0.0000128344855,0.000033382003,0.000017604923,0.00003884286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977537,0.0009474586,0.00048154983,0.0001004928,0.00012207139,0.0005947614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005357578,0.00017351915,0.000294965,0.00073762046,0.0005937795,0.0009198858,0.00039914896,0.00032902125,0.0050188587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022957223,0.00020032036,0.00033159996,0.00082842406,0.0005519418,0.0008762547,0.0007530912,0.0003704272,0.0002324491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002616621,0.000023465807,0.9961217,0.000021044729,0.00007381828,0.00006148115,0.00019938615,0.000112057096,0.0010578856,0.00012997474,0.00006492633,0.0018725514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023973948,0.000017276821,0.99943644,0.0000020423117,0.000017986238,0.00003853262,0.0002310498,0.00012154702,0.0000230019,0.00005426404,0.000054503293,0.0000010034616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009552319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061067976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009552319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003453235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032493204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018993437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029876830","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0189-7","title":"Spatial patterns in the diversity of sharks, rays, and chimaeras (Chondrichthyes) in the Southwest Atlantic","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Body size and species richness; Chondrichthyes; Biodiversity; Ecology; Demersal zone; Bycatch; Fishery; Species diversity; Biology; Geography; Pelagic zone; Fishing","score_opus":0.02455866100814984,"score_gpt":0.18285212252358815,"score_spread":0.1582934615154383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029876830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997025,0.000035009547,0.000015471565,0.000016652459,6.156544e-7,6.315562e-7,0.00006622681,8.3810795e-7,0.00016194489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99972826,0.000029461351,0.000036601865,0.0000065419454,0.0000017942409,0.0000012476714,0.000094162024,5.43637e-7,0.0001014191],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981314,0.000023914045,0.000021737718,0.0000598516,0.00003317854,0.000048247748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990958,0.00015636974,0.00035163402,0.00004946797,0.00019331933,0.00015348749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003136598,0.00008245249,0.00015419303,0.0010330672,0.00043914997,0.00044726723,0.00030500183,0.0003172991,0.0010729178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070528255,0.00018259403,0.00017609581,0.0008348707,0.00059171824,0.00032093315,0.00046781873,0.00016300555,0.00013874563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006292616,0.000010408717,0.99571973,0.000008357763,0.00002531798,0.00003368769,0.0004361616,0.00005852227,0.0022448143,0.000035081113,0.000039343533,0.0013256681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.900914e-7,0.000004931349,0.999559,0.0000015114651,0.000002817698,0.000017358168,0.00029415646,0.000061712366,0.000019657306,0.000006758101,0.000030199508,8.821276e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08674977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22861633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08674977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063548004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036080752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17248964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032001483","doi":"10.1007/s10531-014-0703-9","title":"Environmental change in Garry oak (Quercus garryana) ecosystems: the evolution of an eco-cultural landscape","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Geology and Paleoclimatology Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Simon Fraser University; Parks Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada; Parks Canada; Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions","keywords":"Woodland; Geography; Ecology; Paleoecology; Land use; Historical ecology; Ecosystem; Biology","score_opus":0.020695507276922404,"score_gpt":0.200362536286635,"score_spread":0.1796670290097126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032001483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99783236,0.00038585265,0.000059321334,0.00013371545,0.000001930555,0.0000015673793,0.00003052028,0.0000036621598,0.0015510799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99943024,0.00024605784,0.000087833585,0.000029518425,0.0000016055402,0.0000010427323,0.000023269056,0.0000026459222,0.00017775931],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998036,0.00005038232,0.000006625407,0.000052793974,0.000028690723,0.000057860485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997305,0.000037594004,0.000078396806,0.000022012657,0.00006035194,0.00007112933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037155632,0.00012316229,0.0001440221,0.0009698725,0.0012957791,0.0020875917,0.00030907235,0.0003743837,0.0006308327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055827235,0.000116631265,0.00011252902,0.0012616814,0.0015989589,0.00047998945,0.0006985748,0.00029383105,0.00006416455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008643879,0.000057350037,0.9469538,0.00009492502,0.00007507984,0.000913834,0.010964262,0.0010855909,0.010407812,0.0012788947,0.00038437668,0.027697658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.0319653e-7,0.0000060760362,0.996358,0.000009867366,0.0000054754337,0.00005738673,0.0025138927,0.00014107101,0.00006449358,0.000102957696,0.0007368999,0.0000035028706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20759246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50622696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20759246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024859786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010409025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41276824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032502879","doi":"10.1007/s10531-009-9696-1","title":"Q’eqchi’ Maya healers’ traditional knowledge in prioritizing conservation of medicinal plants: culturally relative conservation in sustaining traditional holistic health promotion","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Cleveland State University","keywords":"Maya; Biodiversity; Geography; Traditional knowledge; Ethnobiology; Agroforestry; Ecology; Biology; Indigenous; Archaeology","score_opus":0.17506510743669637,"score_gpt":0.2802605532144456,"score_spread":0.10519544577774922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032502879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.955488,0.0006560127,0.0009592115,0.0044821417,0.00003959509,0.000034893725,0.000025031466,0.000005959521,0.03830901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99681574,0.00021219047,0.0004938754,0.00036131666,0.000013474038,0.000013081061,0.000009107509,0.0000012003874,0.0020800875],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995586,0.00019204016,0.000021131682,0.000032789372,0.00009269459,0.0001027375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914217,0.00037337115,0.0001952434,0.000048412807,0.00013715307,0.00010362616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013828514,0.00016854182,0.0001563439,0.0008272321,0.0023768977,0.0017266802,0.00031370856,0.00041798802,0.005248594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001789873,0.00012891379,0.00015995387,0.0015614376,0.0020297957,0.001627642,0.0012283647,0.00063892035,0.00022249972],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005549373,0.0013963807,0.26308703,0.00088206894,0.000110796034,0.0031259044,0.3801894,0.000272121,0.016830752,0.05345665,0.004518715,0.27557528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012346053,0.00060788245,0.44251943,0.00039450952,0.00029614565,0.002722034,0.45027477,0.001464174,0.0061954563,0.02083872,0.07449297,0.000070478316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071907304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018084332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071907304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010137792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012801479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017558336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033663910","doi":"10.1007/s10531-014-0838-8","title":"Spatial patterns and environmental correlates of bryophyte richness: sampling effort matters","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Body size and species richness; Ecology; Bryophyte; Sampling (signal processing); Biodiversity; Biological dispersal; Species diversity; Rank abundance curve; Sampling bias; Biology; Geography; Statistics; Species evenness; Mathematics; Population; Sample size determination","score_opus":0.012423149791599303,"score_gpt":0.16692816112706277,"score_spread":0.15450501133546346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033663910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99605536,0.00028513995,0.0014006066,0.00012120655,0.000008477788,0.000012934234,0.00020741603,0.0000090172625,0.0018999099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989911,0.00007579575,0.00035578408,0.00003790285,0.000008972792,0.000010328192,0.00016518049,0.000013310569,0.00034166285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952526,0.002657518,0.00038324136,0.00086470717,0.0004974151,0.00034449843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790927,0.011170083,0.0049653547,0.003118324,0.0009796581,0.00067383586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068592546,0.00019916128,0.00040182853,0.0007007021,0.0007948345,0.0011781208,0.00072424917,0.00040443076,0.0027889234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01997945,0.00030679014,0.0003923923,0.0013635897,0.0012594135,0.0016503046,0.0011434441,0.00029607958,0.000268126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006795428,0.00001989923,0.99478334,0.0000150253545,0.000092786075,0.000019409776,0.0003567375,0.00009615837,0.0009848799,0.00012911123,0.00008074182,0.0033538651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012704822,0.00001678327,0.9990227,0.000003995324,0.000026585181,0.00003875129,0.0003338686,0.00015246877,0.00016334643,0.00006027391,0.00017844797,0.0000016439426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007972035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021634808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007972035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031182254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039349156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036275685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034164941","doi":"10.1007/s10531-012-0383-2","title":"Assessing declines of North American bumble bees (Bombus spp.) using museum specimens","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; York University","funders":"Division of Biological Infrastructure; University of Connecticut; American Museum of Natural History","keywords":"Nearctic ecozone; Pollinator; Apidae; Ecology; Fauna; Hymenoptera; Biology; Biodiversity; Geography; Pollination; Pollen; Taxonomy (biology)","score_opus":0.13725492602399475,"score_gpt":0.2411876275395411,"score_spread":0.10393270151554634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034164941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977635,0.00033030464,0.00015051085,0.00003890057,0.0000034280831,0.000022778046,0.0003325602,0.00000909048,0.0013488759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99687433,0.00034770573,0.0010570304,0.00002556632,0.000009833729,0.00004054543,0.00078256073,0.0000023485181,0.0008600233],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994968,0.00012720954,0.00004310654,0.00011263823,0.00016260048,0.000057521305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976037,0.00032777202,0.0011952447,0.00018513046,0.0005019261,0.00018607744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010449562,0.00031011988,0.00015549482,0.0018759569,0.00072065607,0.00049257965,0.0005453486,0.0004363132,0.0015106825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003641247,0.00032732644,0.00014546589,0.00084407313,0.00038846344,0.0010271516,0.00054528733,0.00032586523,0.0002817191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076549055,0.000045915614,0.968815,0.00007396224,0.000059575712,0.00004432255,0.0012597375,0.000114156464,0.0027338513,0.000042973887,0.0005476308,0.026186218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018702691,0.00004528003,0.9983374,0.000012813311,0.000020429718,0.00006150178,0.00050927483,0.00014607585,0.0002884377,0.000010793852,0.0005640314,0.0000021555447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036095314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16041473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036095314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006299404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031938654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07177043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035931222","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9095-9","title":"How resilient are Andean montane forest bird communities to habitat degradation?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Habitat; Secondary forest; Old-growth forest; Geography; Biodiversity; Cloud forest; Foraging; Ordination; Habitat destruction; Agroforestry; Biology; Montane ecology","score_opus":0.015198837234656943,"score_gpt":0.18517527537633582,"score_spread":0.16997643814167887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035931222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952218,0.00027135716,0.00011851958,0.0011566356,0.000011033272,0.0000038733388,0.00008292058,0.0000049389514,0.0031289125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994141,0.00013645603,0.000057260848,0.00013096268,0.00000849645,0.0000020054406,0.00003208999,0.0000016170111,0.00021708442],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969137,0.00006938031,0.0000084212425,0.00006039391,0.000029199964,0.00014118975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908984,0.00012542104,0.00030626566,0.000112019145,0.00012162451,0.0002448852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075205206,0.00015795413,0.00018712803,0.00087913114,0.0011702725,0.0017069961,0.0003726077,0.0006968613,0.0024849747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026355218,0.00013225494,0.00020223006,0.00070005836,0.0019946406,0.001998575,0.0008903387,0.00044621414,0.0001678058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015216,0.000057657064,0.94660497,0.000047565605,0.00024489078,0.00023816575,0.007775843,0.0008640802,0.0018541429,0.0018982908,0.0011030778,0.039159086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025900367,0.00004084744,0.98091805,0.000017704617,0.00002546,0.00016024846,0.0138273435,0.0003144075,0.000094929215,0.0020870373,0.002502673,0.000008723594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026414918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07218816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026414918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083730376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045553426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05252236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036670093","doi":"10.1023/b:bioc.0000018152.11643.9c","title":"A collaborative GIS method for integrating local and technical knowledge in establishing biodiversity conservation priorities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Structuring; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Measurement of biodiversity; Identification (biology); Environmental planning; Computer science; Framing (construction); Geographic information system; Business; Biodiversity conservation; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.028997995782689117,"score_gpt":0.26092347601609933,"score_spread":0.23192548023341023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036670093","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050185714,0.0000604351,0.9844806,0.00022976332,0.00006326541,0.0003808912,0.00029937393,0.00066529633,0.0088017965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01947361,0.000025642881,0.978949,0.000020256519,0.000008918365,0.0003935968,0.00015491931,0.000084295105,0.00088972773],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98604506,0.0067055016,0.0011718795,0.0018584552,0.0038470794,0.00037195365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975609,0.0122667,0.0012258725,0.0051833494,0.00502535,0.00068978936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012133017,0.0011102918,0.0012987506,0.0103475405,0.0026524768,0.00562487,0.00247724,0.0015175273,0.013076765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032105345,0.0011325345,0.0017278442,0.012014067,0.0017324333,0.0050768065,0.0065215076,0.0015112321,0.0021280919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018408142,0.0003930843,0.007883188,0.00085731666,0.00042458146,0.0003499288,0.008947471,0.012435685,0.007598357,0.11871634,0.019398902,0.82281107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005074202,0.00041817225,0.014316636,0.0008779819,0.0011918914,0.0031231826,0.0133740315,0.34453842,0.019561008,0.29976058,0.30172524,0.00060549757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008683437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017915742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013076765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001384115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054383003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06416631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036936216","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0138-5","title":"The intersection of conservation and horticulture: bird-pollinated Lotus species from the Canary Islands (Leguminosae)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología; Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria","keywords":"Endangered species; Conservation status; Biology; Lotus; Biodiversity; Ex situ conservation; Critically endangered; Agroforestry; In situ conservation; Cutting; Ecology; Geography; Genetic diversity; Botany; Habitat; Population","score_opus":0.019587496536304084,"score_gpt":0.169588169847985,"score_spread":0.1500006733116809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036936216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998863,0.00019942316,0.000024567287,0.00007047939,8.640183e-7,0.0000010505045,0.00002121105,0.0000010016702,0.00081857154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99971217,0.00005898267,0.000040490828,0.000017585453,9.0342195e-7,6.8821197e-7,0.00002848217,5.578214e-7,0.00014000644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998938,0.000027927399,0.000005350945,0.000018590179,0.00001708689,0.000037328035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997009,0.000037622693,0.00008134961,0.000021895556,0.000053423035,0.0001048079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026978686,0.00011186826,0.00013732347,0.0009785906,0.0009079731,0.0007633312,0.00035854295,0.00020109446,0.0013932177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034504622,0.000063700834,0.00006831145,0.000868736,0.0010961253,0.00036518578,0.00063139416,0.00020717036,0.000057180776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004613765,0.000052906278,0.9076037,0.00012976132,0.00009649529,0.00093943055,0.011990986,0.00016902582,0.042734835,0.0013587301,0.0002767545,0.03418588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019164822,0.00001696581,0.99622273,0.0000052815385,0.000009473201,0.00015035512,0.0028805605,0.000045634017,0.00017241061,0.00006240019,0.0004298841,0.0000022323402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037526216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18137047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037526216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008040192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059323106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0746156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039017681","doi":"10.1007/s10531-009-9719-y","title":"Decomposing logs increase oribatid mite assemblage diversity in mixedwood boreal forest","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Species richness; Coarse woody debris; Biodiversity; Forest floor; Litter; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Habitat; Species diversity; Mite; Geography; Forestry; Snag; Environmental science; Taiga; Biology; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.02717699361342302,"score_gpt":0.20253725752330123,"score_spread":0.17536026390987822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039017681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997379,0.000046474834,0.00001601844,0.000006187314,0.0000015769655,0.0000012814587,0.00002030606,0.0000023299817,0.00016791465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996189,0.000028766623,0.00006216785,0.00001469258,0.000003896571,0.0000028323864,0.00007150537,0.0000013716591,0.00019583345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998369,0.000026400825,0.000012481003,0.000043868655,0.000029983632,0.000050217735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912816,0.00015108008,0.00031763397,0.000054960343,0.00007197904,0.00027627565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024260797,0.00034309732,0.00031615133,0.00060951407,0.000574116,0.0007349177,0.00030045502,0.00033024937,0.001995873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000657607,0.00026987973,0.00024217578,0.00023673389,0.00038206438,0.00059751474,0.000539584,0.0003404125,0.00017861756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009188239,0.00045243418,0.8967267,0.0000744978,0.00009373965,0.0002983626,0.0005347279,0.00015563739,0.09147389,0.0000555911,0.00017609993,0.009039524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003422398,0.00006978401,0.99899524,0.000002402297,0.000010267601,0.00006578171,0.00022212384,0.000085599946,0.00041564618,0.000024299761,0.00010409831,0.0000013704935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044866507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022919465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044866507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026019313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020345919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008921087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041011231","doi":"10.1023/b:bioc.0000029331.92656.de","title":"Biodiversity associated with an irrigated rice agro-ecosystem in Sri Lanka","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Agricultural Systems and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":232,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka; University of Waterloo; University of Canterbury; Smithsonian Institution; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Fauna; Ecosystem; Invertebrate; Ecology; Biology; Paddy field; Ecological succession; Flora (microbiology); Biota; Agroforestry","score_opus":0.02943933493505762,"score_gpt":0.18497399006772758,"score_spread":0.15553465513266995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041011231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99944514,0.000031990487,0.000011886038,0.000012331574,2.3848884e-7,0.0000027270316,0.00003273669,9.0997366e-7,0.00046196944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996917,0.000055830176,0.00007322652,0.0000050303975,6.234593e-7,0.0000053345334,0.00005051157,3.6893042e-7,0.000117339485],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979323,0.000057669444,0.000017868466,0.000024090783,0.000023116016,0.000083992374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997081,0.000046692283,0.000119925375,0.000014854485,0.000047371526,0.000063081345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023806501,0.00017791842,0.00021392915,0.0014134962,0.0013591873,0.0009129215,0.0004390286,0.00021136216,0.001001942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032552023,0.00016317333,0.00026337386,0.0019028833,0.0013070786,0.00035303787,0.0010359555,0.00021440312,0.00008258515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032031984,0.00013066581,0.95527357,0.00022063371,0.00021087154,0.004195804,0.011782717,0.0009991394,0.010743383,0.0012431738,0.00026359753,0.014616191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005633443,0.00013224648,0.99051756,0.000014745278,0.000037868627,0.00059539964,0.0077978913,0.00022733293,0.000163956,0.0000720412,0.0004259973,0.0000092160235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04809113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14608109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04809113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019772246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008160881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09562236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041109427","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9108-8","title":"Global diversity and distribution of macrofungi","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":305,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Taxonomic rank; Endemism; Geography; Biodiversity hotspot; Biogeography; Global biodiversity; Taxon","score_opus":0.012862810583642683,"score_gpt":0.17102395969676687,"score_spread":0.15816114911312418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041109427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99462175,0.0015964068,0.00026711667,0.000051264447,0.0000023985779,0.0000030039696,0.0005902181,0.000012115745,0.0028556685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986609,0.00043334236,0.00016332512,0.000010603811,0.000003634043,0.0000019910349,0.00046553783,0.0000021349506,0.00025845077],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998117,0.000024486344,0.000008354586,0.000077680415,0.000034362492,0.000043482523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994431,0.000084846855,0.00024794196,0.00006212871,0.000087494285,0.00007453981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029270537,0.00020043309,0.00016056541,0.0020612373,0.0002082396,0.00052030495,0.00015673213,0.00018090488,0.002071637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047186745,0.00011427701,0.00016865373,0.0013907196,0.00044208489,0.00056520134,0.0005723578,0.00019510479,0.0002172671],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000184642,0.000021777309,0.93637025,0.0000705315,0.0001540992,0.00007368286,0.0007710105,0.00041828502,0.013758454,0.00070824544,0.0003694089,0.047099613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014411008,0.000023328521,0.998654,0.000006194703,0.000013118341,0.000104808845,0.00014531588,0.00010088128,0.00013267981,0.00010824148,0.00070760545,0.0000023149614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027681554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007413094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027681554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021384167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012014953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0069303513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041772756","doi":"10.1007/s10531-015-0919-3","title":"Characteristics for evaluating the conservation value of species hybrids","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Hybrid; Biodiversity; Endangered species; Taxon; Biology; Ecology; Conservation genetics; Geography; Habitat; Genetics","score_opus":0.22576679785539794,"score_gpt":0.24927084637681413,"score_spread":0.023504048521416188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041772756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787749,0.00040092613,0.006584554,0.00007008102,0.000023439927,0.00010523838,0.0016613585,0.000059875707,0.012319529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922312,0.00006781648,0.005460348,0.000017678101,0.000008517419,0.000054528147,0.0010270507,0.000032074095,0.0011008934],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869436,0.0003553372,0.00016869599,0.00015499708,0.0005277774,0.00009882722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901308,0.004108455,0.0024005582,0.00071912626,0.0017654261,0.0008756997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001959741,0.0004240543,0.0004128593,0.006629239,0.000814284,0.0011795722,0.00077724975,0.0006723246,0.0060562734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005587042,0.00015737953,0.0006202169,0.0036140466,0.0006795602,0.0012949149,0.0007717586,0.00045658502,0.00077591505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015129531,0.00034045614,0.8625305,0.00027971313,0.00031392943,0.0003831964,0.00065193855,0.004442039,0.056365237,0.0035623806,0.0008368997,0.06878078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030927557,0.0014161895,0.9566965,0.0000473051,0.0003252226,0.0014809896,0.0022155233,0.0052330852,0.024276493,0.0032498823,0.004975668,0.00005217485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015608126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030561744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006629239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008226705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003289171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020260274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042934267","doi":"10.1007/s10531-014-0672-z","title":"RETRACTED ARTICLE: Molecular taxonomic tools provide more accurate estimates of species richness at less cost than traditional morphology-based taxonomic practices in a vegetation survey","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":true,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Taxonomic rank; Biodiversity; Taxonomy (biology); DNA barcoding; Plant identification; Biology; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Taxon; Geography; Botany","score_opus":0.09480767016860035,"score_gpt":0.23601711047313556,"score_spread":0.1412094403045352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042934267","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00061696116,0.0014678527,0.0012814786,0.16066428,0.83218557,0.00003756774,0.0005081684,0.0005136741,0.0027244147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012918315,0.0039932076,0.0046745203,0.31583732,0.55743724,0.00012511227,0.0011714686,0.0007318668,0.10311087],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965215,0.0004894928,0.00051871943,0.00050595746,0.0015642243,0.0004000934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751143,0.008191887,0.0014846674,0.0014331397,0.011365663,0.0024104],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004296044,0.0018469723,0.0019814454,0.0035540909,0.0032515517,0.0036827913,0.0038747154,0.01581678,0.018049633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036581818,0.0012642123,0.0015059314,0.0017340513,0.0029504828,0.0026112874,0.002067301,0.015723925,0.01982376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069658585,0.000028064633,0.00027277455,0.00010361356,0.000018973966,0.00098246,0.000041956948,0.00005399003,0.00023613336,0.00038248207,0.9845552,0.013254778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050709004,0.00006308587,0.0030230004,0.00025811707,0.000055633176,0.001420055,0.00013820412,0.00045475658,0.00076103455,0.0014594287,0.9922626,0.00005326913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009318069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014304178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003638494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034318327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06038201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043056067","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0142-9","title":"Environmental correlates of plant and invertebrate species richness in ponds","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"LIFE programme; European Commission; Government of Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Invertebrate; Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Odonata; Taxon; Habitat; Species diversity; Generalist and specialist species","score_opus":0.0214269250832378,"score_gpt":0.1510089924760397,"score_spread":0.1295820673928019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043056067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995677,0.000014266831,0.00003728143,0.0000052148957,4.7146165e-7,0.0000014301614,0.000059731432,0.0000027258654,0.00031121814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998273,0.000008950148,0.000035981866,0.0000040187765,9.919792e-7,0.0000019001105,0.000039595605,0.0000012165649,0.000080147285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996476,0.000092745635,0.00003379331,0.00007753054,0.00006356691,0.00008471446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997663,0.00059940974,0.00088529795,0.00011263923,0.00021397504,0.00052567845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041034067,0.00010812831,0.00032408128,0.00085579953,0.00058096874,0.0007554246,0.00028873718,0.00027951246,0.0025221102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002434405,0.00025483215,0.00026014476,0.0009097605,0.0011441855,0.0006318011,0.0012531894,0.00026945397,0.00022211565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031832414,0.00006415272,0.9920007,0.000016541873,0.000049737555,0.000120031844,0.00028721354,0.00024856403,0.005120606,0.00009579378,0.00005114988,0.0016270195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015657354,0.000032288324,0.99950254,0.000001125726,0.0000042692163,0.0000373626,0.0001582217,0.0001252304,0.00007417116,0.000040929153,0.000020867614,0.0000014617549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038334979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018321231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038334979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051246595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035402674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008437276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045393223","doi":"10.1007/s10531-008-9447-8","title":"Diatoms: unicellular surrogates for macroalgal community structure in streams?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Diatom; Species richness; Taxon; STREAMS; Ecology; Biodiversity; Latitude; Community structure; Biology; Canonical correspondence analysis; Geography","score_opus":0.022052125106387356,"score_gpt":0.18152392768077819,"score_spread":0.15947180257439084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045393223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.983198,0.0012406918,0.012139182,0.00021438877,0.000052513376,0.00003424438,0.00066331297,0.000045222416,0.0024124268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919859,0.00024728169,0.007051803,0.00004517029,0.000020357711,0.00003434959,0.00019969963,0.000010488408,0.00040499136],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992741,0.00040592448,0.000044801538,0.00014829662,0.00008427916,0.00004271003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982565,0.000474487,0.00061215437,0.00026720253,0.00015595852,0.00023366285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001470637,0.00025741942,0.00040426353,0.00079547556,0.00053588423,0.0012828326,0.00048897514,0.0006479069,0.0008029906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035470542,0.00027996584,0.00014572633,0.001002003,0.00063845864,0.0011830498,0.0006899774,0.0005243824,0.00016821687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011592639,0.00015393361,0.85338557,0.0002255503,0.0001879543,0.00014094739,0.0012474302,0.0016824327,0.07282368,0.00738856,0.0012903572,0.06031431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119817436,0.0008124362,0.88001573,0.000188532,0.00038544025,0.001110921,0.0030728057,0.041751515,0.038717013,0.019843562,0.0138852745,0.000096961085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021779817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069151754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021779817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048669544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025790164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0077775717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046213438","doi":"10.1007/s10531-005-4052-6","title":"Using satellite imagery to assess breeding habitat availability of the endangered loggerhead shrike in Qu�bec","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Shrike; Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Endangered species; Range (aeronautics); Grassland; Biodiversity; Vegetation (pathology); Pasture; Biology; Forestry","score_opus":0.05943289648098383,"score_gpt":0.2514700465787694,"score_spread":0.1920371500977856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046213438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988141,0.00003149881,0.00007283642,0.000028261158,0.0000015494426,0.000010840921,0.00039263588,0.0000053654476,0.0006429591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979814,0.000044228593,0.00048515512,0.000024409794,0.0000016723545,0.000011486381,0.00062666135,0.0000027669826,0.00082218624],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986446,0.000021404845,0.000005852702,0.000027811126,0.000035367542,0.000045028362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917513,0.00012419098,0.000121098536,0.00003517839,0.0004009091,0.00014339926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033245972,0.00016401208,0.00019874737,0.0008067821,0.00074867834,0.00046796972,0.00041695213,0.00026721874,0.001176989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010795576,0.00016857317,0.00010923107,0.0010174506,0.00031745856,0.0003611019,0.0002654256,0.00022971009,0.00014930656],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001172719,0.00008360432,0.9830015,0.000022440807,0.000050098697,0.00008922894,0.00089378114,0.00061551854,0.0021286553,0.000040594925,0.0010324765,0.011924852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050428343,0.000013979555,0.9977138,0.000005346274,0.0000076174447,0.0000150376445,0.0006146536,0.0012859522,0.000084779975,0.0000062573704,0.00024420442,0.0000033682886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.954655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04534501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003868834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002026772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091224074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048881972","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0219-5","title":"The contribution of riffles and riverine wetlands to benthic macroinvertebrate biodiversity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Riffle; Species richness; Wetland; Biodiversity; Ecology; Habitat; Biomonitoring; Benthic zone; Drainage basin; Environmental science; Geography; Ecoregion; Invertebrate; Biology","score_opus":0.011366873462926873,"score_gpt":0.1845242740244347,"score_spread":0.17315740056150783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048881972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982723,0.0004562686,0.000098384,0.000071904615,0.0000022452855,0.0000015011684,0.000047335983,0.0000016073334,0.0010484605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99949396,0.00020928153,0.00007970544,0.000012189407,0.000009205638,0.0000012516259,0.000028173901,9.1211206e-7,0.0001654311],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995646,0.00016899005,0.000022998332,0.000060751194,0.00008036131,0.00010238111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851376,0.0004368346,0.0004621428,0.00008028831,0.00022610353,0.0002807923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076445256,0.00019190079,0.00023494221,0.0012522879,0.0007738383,0.00093554804,0.00029979864,0.00038677163,0.0016786563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022326133,0.00022324006,0.00028711976,0.00077522,0.0009997741,0.00084847404,0.00085235346,0.0002487321,0.00014729083],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016780668,0.000031047624,0.9683995,0.00005657125,0.00019937499,0.00023946501,0.0005247203,0.000775042,0.004158231,0.00062801945,0.00016506838,0.024655104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013667545,0.000019282683,0.99919087,0.0000034750115,0.0000134461625,0.00007435134,0.00019198855,0.00019570967,0.00004298572,0.000122055484,0.00014248259,0.0000020659961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013585364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056130666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013585364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005136085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003129892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027012587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049522177","doi":"10.1007/s10531-009-9726-z","title":"Biodiversity and ecological forest-cover domains in boreal landscapes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Academy of Finland","keywords":"Taiga; Boreal; Ecology; Biodiversity; Habitat; Geography; Fragmentation (computing); Landscape ecology; Forest ecology; Environmental science; Ecosystem; Biology","score_opus":0.010609183636576883,"score_gpt":0.1810617360460534,"score_spread":0.17045255240947654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049522177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99889946,0.00020578282,0.000048548885,0.000036733643,0.0000012108326,6.4807915e-7,0.000088044166,0.0000011183695,0.0007184931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99976677,0.0000377225,0.00004196971,0.000004619083,0.0000022604595,7.850603e-7,0.00006431787,4.912248e-7,0.000081022576],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985695,0.000049724113,0.000008625368,0.000028852335,0.000019051271,0.00003678976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987643,0.00047414197,0.0003704582,0.000057052297,0.00009472608,0.00023934805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049138896,0.00010568635,0.00013686593,0.0010389893,0.0005260018,0.0007964141,0.00023426893,0.0002226249,0.0023136146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002084859,0.00011217012,0.00017962352,0.0009026135,0.0007680228,0.0010686966,0.0006431488,0.0002393758,0.0000716407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017706111,0.00003863494,0.9912293,0.00001733296,0.00005881296,0.00006248337,0.0005092605,0.0006959667,0.00053353776,0.0015015107,0.00015521432,0.0050208624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014923393,0.000008814425,0.9985089,0.0000028734335,0.0000075738467,0.000067718385,0.00034474905,0.0004050709,0.000013313968,0.00052304595,0.000114813716,0.0000016460018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016653245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07513514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016653245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047629292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017353338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033112586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053737986","doi":"10.1007/s10531-012-0382-3","title":"Spatial graphs as templates for habitat networks in boreal landscapes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Academy of Finland","keywords":"Computer science; Landscape connectivity; Node (physics); Spatial network; Habitat; Boreal; Ecology; Geography; Biodiversity; Network topology; Spatial ecology; Biological dispersal; Mathematics; Biology; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.013592344047222394,"score_gpt":0.20936599933096156,"score_spread":0.19577365528373916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053737986","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07537501,0.0006487601,0.89477533,0.0008007128,0.000117327385,0.00022807562,0.011489163,0.0033530605,0.013212619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48009557,0.0009329633,0.49413338,0.00017566778,0.00006126629,0.00048826405,0.017341431,0.0012210135,0.005550479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903154,0.00032599128,0.00012227087,0.0002931386,0.00015128012,0.00007575554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947537,0.002820345,0.00052862236,0.0013749931,0.00030089158,0.00022141669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011797093,0.00059211004,0.00054151047,0.0019159866,0.0008372822,0.0028781279,0.0013717493,0.0010977408,0.006131914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009008927,0.00091687916,0.0012626931,0.0023721096,0.0010842702,0.00530273,0.001595701,0.001301801,0.0014359629],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012562162,0.000081284204,0.0067574116,0.0003253797,0.00007396622,0.0005277396,0.0022222754,0.111753665,0.0020101243,0.7996635,0.012625759,0.06383331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024471896,0.000015609405,0.0010115464,0.000106913314,0.000051513864,0.0003036321,0.00045447302,0.2499839,0.0011682279,0.7109572,0.035898954,0.000023464716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075771557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013775858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075771557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010303044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008758557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020513296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057866469","doi":"10.1007/s10531-013-0497-1","title":"The scientific value of the largest remaining old-growth red pine forests in North America","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; University of Guelph","funders":"Fondation de l’Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","keywords":"Biodiversity; Threatened species; Endangered species; Ecology; Geography; Disturbance (geology); Ecological succession; Climate change; Agroforestry; Forest ecology; Habitat; Old-growth forest; Ecosystem; Forestry; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.007667502161512053,"score_gpt":0.16465020543022915,"score_spread":0.1569827032687171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057866469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92411494,0.024875944,0.00028500537,0.015341953,0.00030012988,0.000015653352,0.0018802304,0.000035455883,0.033150714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99052656,0.005648925,0.00060539646,0.0004894372,0.00036409014,0.000007755664,0.00071107293,0.000006813065,0.0016400144],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998985,0.0002778636,0.000065369924,0.00014280649,0.00039094122,0.00013792749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982682,0.0054775965,0.0024478436,0.00087733776,0.0064747217,0.00204043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043999,0.0003333137,0.00043879784,0.0040088193,0.0025469628,0.0034842105,0.0006721356,0.00051673455,0.0019218295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010277004,0.00018304202,0.00021759648,0.0044921404,0.0022883182,0.0022728746,0.0014887694,0.000777592,0.0002132207],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065727,0.00016970247,0.554986,0.00086778717,0.0003029886,0.0007615248,0.004398583,0.001881004,0.0057832818,0.006988894,0.013918342,0.4092845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017232078,0.00006351943,0.95442766,0.00024455533,0.00014381493,0.00032832185,0.0060173864,0.00094683125,0.0010931878,0.004830442,0.03186509,0.000021923273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03675664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1452456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03675664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023386644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041469764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07308537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058053698","doi":"10.1007/s10531-008-9444-y","title":"Cultivating participatory policy processes for genetic resources policy: lessons from the Genetic Resources Policy Initiative (GRPI) project","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre; Rockefeller Foundation","keywords":"Stakeholder; Stakeholder engagement; Citizen journalism; Process (computing); Champion; Business; Political science; Public relations; Environmental resource management; Knowledge management; Process management; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09368785647589166,"score_gpt":0.27300806278181544,"score_spread":0.17932020630592377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058053698","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09938446,0.0033512854,0.051908206,0.5997083,0.0009100927,0.0006013086,0.00009742407,0.00017391916,0.24386497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93729204,0.0020832173,0.028252808,0.020468613,0.00020424012,0.0008137887,0.000087218854,0.000106649684,0.010691395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96386003,0.028618895,0.00039804957,0.0013399402,0.0020633228,0.0037198118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.891334,0.091380954,0.002498891,0.004050635,0.0027701042,0.007965382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08241329,0.00072744186,0.00056663074,0.0012424682,0.016356308,0.01610057,0.0030453918,0.011017046,0.0050007636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06431773,0.00044553832,0.00062638306,0.002021174,0.030748595,0.012325008,0.016189894,0.012674535,0.00043892986],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009566844,0.0004623628,0.0022987858,0.00014726329,0.00003228876,0.00027899857,0.024603454,0.0030202924,0.00026792803,0.91382426,0.017004706,0.037963986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023062994,0.00009417691,0.0023465147,0.00046800653,0.00002926577,0.00006620564,0.027074866,0.0035180904,0.000822147,0.845734,0.11956835,0.00004782066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019309472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029630223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08241329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016697906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061511848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43584836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060359306","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9146-2","title":"Responses of ground-active beetle assemblages to different styles of reforestation on cleared rainforest land","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Griffith University","keywords":"Reforestation; Rainforest; Ecology; Tropical rainforest; Agroforestry; Biodiversity; Clearance; Habitat; Generalist and specialist species; Afforestation; Tropics; Geography; Biology; Forestry","score_opus":0.03355754822463721,"score_gpt":0.2261084468732248,"score_spread":0.19255089864858757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060359306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99986994,0.0000071910126,0.000007110496,0.0000038080802,4.5390166e-7,9.128851e-7,0.000022807639,4.0052672e-7,0.000087392524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999673,0.00001638338,0.000026173499,0.0000136619965,0.0000019799827,0.0000030009364,0.00010317304,8.985654e-7,0.00016171203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975926,0.00007354894,0.000016463564,0.00004473942,0.000018376137,0.000087651264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986992,0.00041296877,0.0003314213,0.00007663749,0.00012537821,0.0003544212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004072298,0.0001790394,0.0002730648,0.00046222183,0.00041729465,0.00065894105,0.00025400307,0.00046356698,0.00239187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012859239,0.00020392354,0.00030221007,0.0003234698,0.00053141086,0.00036233608,0.00050437415,0.000424552,0.00019548858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019278445,0.00021639845,0.9668069,0.000034945624,0.00019092308,0.00014107634,0.00080029876,0.00068066275,0.026295632,0.000074002826,0.00008391707,0.0027474093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000443493,0.00007567717,0.99935335,0.000001036623,0.000006995587,0.00001621998,0.00023872463,0.00011698283,0.0001431046,0.000015410877,0.000026136398,0.000001988981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008647317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028856758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008647317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003907169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017120109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017193973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060719107","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-0549-7","title":"Quantifying the Components of Biocomplexity Along Ecological Perturbation Gradients","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Warwick","keywords":"Species evenness; Ecology; Entropy (arrow of time); Perturbation (astronomy); Biodiversity; Species diversity; Environmental science; Mathematics; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.06366659879020234,"score_gpt":0.2382609545924859,"score_spread":0.17459435580228355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060719107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923745,0.00004372591,0.0069530047,0.00003110636,0.0000026441744,0.000011171186,0.00007333041,0.00002155131,0.00048903585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982462,0.000025160305,0.0015302665,0.000008584799,0.0000032976143,0.000007472336,0.00008367522,0.000006531475,0.000088726585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996296,0.00008887921,0.000026982158,0.00011975699,0.00007660091,0.000058221405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99594647,0.0022494383,0.00088625867,0.0004560259,0.00023488647,0.00022696628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068892905,0.00024871906,0.00039457035,0.0013591395,0.00032505722,0.0011300526,0.00028073642,0.00041713123,0.0009355864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060057733,0.000276041,0.00025541935,0.0011578111,0.00073437026,0.001438664,0.00081800914,0.0004688652,0.00006921286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014192873,0.0005321713,0.5858943,0.00029706626,0.00085598096,0.00034125728,0.00064008724,0.09040332,0.22213496,0.010718672,0.00053902087,0.08622394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020243366,0.0001917469,0.8353732,0.000010569026,0.00011555875,0.0002307958,0.00027749245,0.14371891,0.009774673,0.0098954085,0.00034379,0.000047642534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014595136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002327571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0014595136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041082076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002572945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0036434531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061828609","doi":"10.1007/s10531-013-0583-4","title":"Prioritizing regionally rare plant species for conservation using herbarium data","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; University of Manitoba; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Herbarium; Vascular plant; Adaptability; Biodiversity; Taxon; Resource (disambiguation); Geography; Rare species; Ranking (information retrieval); Natural resource; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Population; Hierarchy; Biology; Habitat; Computer science; Political science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.16314681339752035,"score_gpt":0.22364447020408018,"score_spread":0.06049765680655983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061828609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9501493,0.0015699492,0.031265073,0.0010040643,0.00008161362,0.00047628212,0.005050484,0.00035880075,0.010044317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9303823,0.00040244882,0.06230385,0.00015968237,0.000037131635,0.00012173509,0.0048303045,0.00007123453,0.0016912246],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998869,0.00036861296,0.00009089584,0.00022651207,0.00022181805,0.00022317884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948832,0.0018064042,0.0010492703,0.0005114896,0.0011193091,0.00063031784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023466519,0.00046864647,0.0007825296,0.009220184,0.0009816361,0.0015168375,0.001320423,0.0005278793,0.0043476876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062210327,0.00027080224,0.00056676334,0.00434424,0.00020696818,0.0011847521,0.001130606,0.0005391807,0.0005866317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072825764,0.00026539585,0.6469514,0.0009814925,0.0005068706,0.00072111224,0.00094449316,0.006235097,0.05449873,0.0018499686,0.010580683,0.27573657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000904853,0.00023769915,0.9073834,0.000265458,0.0010542053,0.001165431,0.006314314,0.03355141,0.016511941,0.003411699,0.02992652,0.00008737803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030737787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11473748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030737787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006795268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016567255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06111777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063630081","doi":"10.1007/s10531-015-0873-0","title":"Influence of traffic mortality on forest bird abundance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Geography; Ecology; Relative species abundance; Biodiversity; Environmental science; Collision; Traffic volume; Physical geography; Biology; Transport engineering","score_opus":0.0348309250656855,"score_gpt":0.22901573767032884,"score_spread":0.19418481260464335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063630081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99827385,0.0000615475,0.00006501976,0.000048622427,0.0000068684876,9.706041e-7,0.00009057377,0.00000486674,0.0014476692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937683,0.000025912055,0.00002153781,0.000009001083,0.0000091204565,8.159303e-7,0.000058598453,0.000003916622,0.00049413345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996277,0.00018007423,0.00001476612,0.000041188057,0.000023908104,0.000112257345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968226,0.0017703796,0.00036921742,0.00012810565,0.00030895037,0.0006007668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006543021,0.00022250184,0.00024044218,0.00049235363,0.00044410702,0.00075814064,0.00027585318,0.00042342697,0.006122233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036232292,0.00015326806,0.00041948693,0.0003006728,0.00037051126,0.0003009636,0.00035248196,0.0003990297,0.0006163677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015228877,0.00017647754,0.9805086,0.000023394543,0.00023912801,0.00033347824,0.00017080535,0.0026775575,0.0047047217,0.0003126238,0.0006503261,0.008680025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006803058,0.00014171013,0.99691474,0.000003821954,0.000060798986,0.00008961554,0.00018605536,0.0019841932,0.00026674644,0.000103100436,0.00023826364,0.0000040705945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010699399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021437207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010699399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034467917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026738667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021274209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063905819","doi":"10.1007/s10531-014-0641-6","title":"A continental-scale study of seed lifespan in experimental storage examining seed, plant, and environmental traits associated with longevity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Seed Germination and Physiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Longevity; Biology; Germination; Dormancy; Abiotic component; Herbaceous plant; Habit; Biodiversity; Botany; Ecology; Agronomy","score_opus":0.02363047286471146,"score_gpt":0.18690328577526724,"score_spread":0.1632728129105558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063905819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99961674,0.000030634987,0.000109482346,0.0000047142566,6.860324e-7,0.000004389061,0.0000904635,0.0000018169809,0.00014101317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876934,0.00004384594,0.00048607838,0.00003985131,0.0000018317868,0.00001697382,0.00031729194,0.000004980699,0.0003198735],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998746,0.00003834352,0.0000061099613,0.00005369047,0.000010148121,0.00001717334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994018,0.00013064746,0.00013782684,0.00015174634,0.00007840646,0.00009958452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034828187,0.00021233615,0.00026594562,0.00039938136,0.00060868915,0.0002802166,0.0003191975,0.0002585383,0.000905667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003964888,0.00015436397,0.00027874814,0.00066303794,0.00069937814,0.00037323072,0.00056087674,0.00038925913,0.00014135217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003266109,0.0014138543,0.77837086,0.00009268184,0.0004977348,0.00033056075,0.0029738457,0.0005595262,0.19643214,0.00047889177,0.00033237177,0.015251373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013056046,0.00030268697,0.99689543,0.000003309445,0.000031794054,0.0000792222,0.00039482437,0.00017621176,0.0017057396,0.000026238591,0.00036679461,0.000004691301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012807998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042221088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012807998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003473314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002769579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02546686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070581603","doi":"10.1007/s10531-007-9168-4","title":"Does habitat loss affect the communities of plants and insects equally in plant–pollinator interactions? Preliminary findings","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Generalist and specialist species; Habitat; Pollinator; Biodiversity; Ecology; Transect; Biology; Pollination; Niche; Habitat destruction; Plant community; Species richness; Pollen","score_opus":0.055273550870663914,"score_gpt":0.21552655392949902,"score_spread":0.1602530030588351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070581603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981371,0.00026141075,0.00033918954,0.00021113598,0.00000393147,0.0000064832643,0.00004219129,0.0000025487175,0.0009960278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991634,0.000072627954,0.00022941719,0.00017064226,0.000011932961,0.00000722947,0.00005689402,0.000002016793,0.00028587694],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994443,0.00018377717,0.00002973164,0.00011746157,0.000081179955,0.00014348388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927765,0.0034053086,0.0017357965,0.0006024569,0.0005800035,0.0008999283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001645629,0.00033693176,0.00048182395,0.0004197469,0.0004902848,0.00074965757,0.00067047315,0.00079190236,0.0036427472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038806146,0.00018481065,0.00042758152,0.00030908032,0.001521003,0.0014815475,0.00093596394,0.0006829808,0.00025891323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052174544,0.0007982765,0.89513487,0.00020198467,0.0003166756,0.0004133288,0.0011105508,0.00078527676,0.06960863,0.00048703636,0.00026315145,0.025662739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017887423,0.0003153036,0.99646723,0.0000051624806,0.00006455333,0.00016351309,0.0005544456,0.00044758388,0.0013598473,0.00043891466,0.00016055857,0.000004856084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018555006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038470128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036427472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025438186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020633216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01218617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071421290","doi":"10.1007/s10531-009-9707-2","title":"“Turtle watching” conservation guidelines: green turtle (Chelonia mydas) tourism in nearshore coastal environments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Turtle (robot); Habitat; Fishery; Flagship species; Tourism; Occupancy; Geography; Sea turtle; Ecology; Biodiversity; Sustainability; Home range; Range (aeronautics); Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science; Endangered species","score_opus":0.022449651759533833,"score_gpt":0.22144908380469017,"score_spread":0.19899943204515633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071421290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20000367,0.01536653,0.05332415,0.27290508,0.019215496,0.014724338,0.015870068,0.008785642,0.39980498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25898606,0.013883823,0.17944999,0.24524052,0.005047151,0.015907954,0.018939756,0.0012816439,0.26126307],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966151,0.00086582167,0.00091188506,0.00017216514,0.0008814131,0.00055360654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865487,0.0028713513,0.002082633,0.000617525,0.0057186936,0.0021609683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006085676,0.0014883017,0.0010023863,0.0023079761,0.0028782934,0.0016962942,0.0044419267,0.012250013,0.0049961363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008651291,0.0009897538,0.0013461289,0.0016592449,0.00248914,0.001426946,0.002481154,0.0052123615,0.0025703434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021380832,0.0013310416,0.02868388,0.0015493749,0.000088810215,0.0029523787,0.0055026375,0.003928646,0.01237374,0.005662945,0.8329562,0.10475657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017147827,0.0007150539,0.19266689,0.004078447,0.00014905467,0.0019623816,0.0046863263,0.0026070501,0.0018784316,0.0030793394,0.78775185,0.00025373872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0693392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20778586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0693392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018695099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011161036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1378712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071937514","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-7839-y","title":"Exploratory multiscale analysis of the fish assemblages and habitats of the lower St. Lawrence River, Québec, Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Habitat; Euryhaline; Electrofishing; Beta diversity; Littoral zone; Species diversity; Estuary; Indicator species; Wetland; Canonical correspondence analysis; Species richness; Geography; Environmental science; Biology; Salinity","score_opus":0.011316739461126397,"score_gpt":0.1727174972800591,"score_spread":0.1614007578189327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071937514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99326867,0.00014854477,0.0026598664,0.000113232374,0.000002442819,0.000018566565,0.0020082474,0.00006340595,0.0017170694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99531895,0.000052264764,0.0024500992,0.00001903625,0.0000015933158,0.000016682707,0.0011155612,0.000015952324,0.0010098153],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998698,0.000014945579,0.0000041642684,0.00003427151,0.00002829513,0.000048558897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968565,0.00006805012,0.000031920314,0.000016699745,0.00015044572,0.000047343638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001915686,0.00021195931,0.00028991944,0.0009876573,0.0011549862,0.00073256757,0.0005019856,0.0002149236,0.0024262227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008960241,0.00015462824,0.00031432317,0.0016786652,0.00039992537,0.00018628099,0.0005263353,0.0002207408,0.00016049929],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027237143,0.00012207867,0.7979802,0.00015848764,0.00036454434,0.0004897884,0.002234624,0.06931679,0.015114249,0.003460647,0.011137002,0.099349156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005999043,0.000008517988,0.9476545,0.000015253827,0.000021658338,0.000024416657,0.0009532429,0.049422696,0.0002390555,0.00030620222,0.0013305196,0.00001791378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97924495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020755053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053817313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004969702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041754484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073843702","doi":"10.1007/s10531-014-0851-y","title":"Tree diversity on sustainably certified and conventional coffee farms in Central America","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian AIDS Treatment Information Exchange","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Species richness; Biodiversity; Agroforestry; Rainforest; Sustainability; Ecology; Geography; Species diversity; Biology","score_opus":0.05074131968455836,"score_gpt":0.22910259496995675,"score_spread":0.17836127528539839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073843702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99963474,0.00004383177,0.000009204055,0.000008798197,7.062754e-7,0.0000014707975,0.00008655159,8.3003357e-7,0.00021376277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996106,0.000029572699,0.00001811574,0.000007795192,0.0000012987155,0.0000023265477,0.0001463594,8.301085e-7,0.00018319629],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996462,0.0000648962,0.000014939457,0.0001034868,0.000053327112,0.000117287935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882,0.0002296509,0.0003416587,0.00006517979,0.00026003306,0.00028349934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043393334,0.00017967712,0.00030516033,0.0020443879,0.0009666225,0.0010919112,0.00062685786,0.0004018383,0.0013188601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083631143,0.00017353239,0.0002305155,0.0024486585,0.0010096985,0.00068099,0.00094138726,0.000258934,0.00013045283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036085927,0.00008819419,0.9879252,0.00002454037,0.000094751114,0.00020227357,0.003603797,0.00020375372,0.0025506879,0.00023057689,0.00026665832,0.004448769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019285596,0.000012090674,0.9978453,0.0000030319907,0.0000073584024,0.000024655166,0.0018482764,0.00008737639,0.00003472946,0.000026988324,0.00010623565,0.000001990219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14188953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4387339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14188953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016710621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007355476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28212726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076704244","doi":"10.1007/s10531-012-0400-5","title":"Short-term effects of reduced white-tailed deer density on insect communities in a strongly overbrowsed boreal forest ecosystem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Center for Northern Studies; Université Laval; Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université Laval","keywords":"Biology; Odocoileus; Ecology; Biodiversity; Fauna; Insect; Abundance (ecology); Herbivore; Lepidoptera genitalia","score_opus":0.02041006958996348,"score_gpt":0.1982289968314524,"score_spread":0.17781892724148893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076704244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99988997,0.000014590945,0.000008330408,0.000009565901,0.0000017376398,7.4906063e-7,0.00001928795,9.3612226e-7,0.0000547167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99973065,0.000013657887,0.00004096954,0.00002330717,0.0000028175477,0.0000034782815,0.00006858398,9.657955e-7,0.00011566006],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999778,0.000054594188,0.000016319087,0.000052485993,0.000019458843,0.00007917141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990314,0.00015452092,0.00018019523,0.00006954875,0.0000636962,0.0005005908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003502756,0.00024954733,0.00033408776,0.00030258167,0.00063534104,0.000756039,0.00047180537,0.00048448736,0.0015477114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008409275,0.00022252282,0.00038830756,0.00020887532,0.0010470778,0.00059531117,0.0007308143,0.00049233815,0.00013179317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012117668,0.0025325322,0.86699086,0.00011837277,0.00067089737,0.0006835346,0.000936902,0.0013144744,0.10429954,0.00021968666,0.00056554226,0.009550041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021176185,0.00040053742,0.9984516,0.0000014267104,0.000033879103,0.000038262344,0.00034341117,0.00024849735,0.00033990075,0.00003026258,0.000085720545,0.000005414482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022521213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08621113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022521213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010362264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042592743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044780195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077080009","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9055-4","title":"Conservation planning with irreplaceability: does the method matter?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Plan (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Biodiversity; Ecology; Protected area; Computer science; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.010422112497795299,"score_gpt":0.19233039305649496,"score_spread":0.18190828055869968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077080009","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016011756,0.030428233,0.3187456,0.42778286,0.007555667,0.00032291276,0.0004373879,0.0004321842,0.1982834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73004484,0.026413085,0.16424473,0.048555635,0.008011171,0.0009496902,0.00030765752,0.0014067867,0.020066394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9265133,0.054891933,0.0024234743,0.003511225,0.010917967,0.0017420991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74688286,0.20129298,0.009233499,0.021648858,0.017525742,0.0034160477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.105713144,0.0015204955,0.0026389116,0.004313836,0.0049577453,0.015137032,0.0057937284,0.008215476,0.032719288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22289294,0.0009924145,0.0021128955,0.004478584,0.043211035,0.05477469,0.007419641,0.011760999,0.002652778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001951791,0.00013651438,0.0037287837,0.0009066685,0.00025532232,0.00009289226,0.0016010404,0.0023643347,0.00010635067,0.8660164,0.021829631,0.1027669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093982366,0.00008751585,0.000769957,0.00101045,0.00009479195,0.0001590221,0.0015723894,0.002237642,0.00022744329,0.9484876,0.04519985,0.00005939129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008703491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012135645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105713144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00632876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012171448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5590712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077116226","doi":"10.1007/s10531-010-9852-7","title":"Intra-specific niche partitioning obscures the importance of fine-scale habitat data in species distribution models","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University; Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Riparian zone; Elevation (ballistics); Niche; Ecology; Land cover; Geography; Environmental niche modelling; Scale (ratio); Physical geography; Geographic information system; Field (mathematics); Ecological niche; Biodiversity; Environmental science; Species distribution; Land use; Cartography; Biology","score_opus":0.037659164949990484,"score_gpt":0.20808594996592858,"score_spread":0.1704267850159381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077116226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69596195,0.0005676752,0.29136392,0.0013358026,0.000073209834,0.000093109724,0.00077969383,0.00046354748,0.009361137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980534,0.000113638525,0.018220296,0.00021652902,0.00004186488,0.000047013556,0.00024454517,0.00015869408,0.00042344822],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99526215,0.00337228,0.00020346508,0.00073351973,0.0002611203,0.00016746529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9492726,0.03994022,0.0013180191,0.007939748,0.00079777313,0.00073164015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014263593,0.0007636004,0.001600664,0.0010907842,0.0013633916,0.0018751151,0.002249942,0.001430972,0.0027917284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0629215,0.0011134164,0.001482474,0.0016535218,0.0026254884,0.0057195663,0.0027945482,0.0026130863,0.00045522212],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001320629,0.00043114906,0.20992202,0.0006156331,0.0017949713,0.00047078016,0.0014510235,0.56863374,0.008768535,0.09400877,0.0033347432,0.10924799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009325557,0.00011591905,0.04125503,0.000060433762,0.00020005993,0.0005831495,0.00022422626,0.8090959,0.0011162695,0.14542791,0.0017733839,0.000054334312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005440921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009662314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014263593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000662216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070882955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07543397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077275506","doi":"10.1007/s10531-009-9619-1","title":"Capacity of large-scale, long-term biodiversity monitoring programmes to detect trends in species prevalence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Scale (ratio); Environmental resource management; Global biodiversity; Geography; Environmental monitoring; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Cartography","score_opus":0.025179915394118953,"score_gpt":0.23327885103194632,"score_spread":0.20809893563782736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077275506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766332,0.00051836966,0.010127126,0.0009714821,0.000058315916,0.0001856899,0.001852496,0.00022468825,0.009428525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99514455,0.00016254126,0.002679221,0.00014014138,0.000041615618,0.0002001142,0.00076371746,0.000013809907,0.0008542135],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773777,0.0009905591,0.00013060705,0.00053006626,0.00040504558,0.00020596363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9509452,0.02711403,0.006685459,0.007582462,0.0052368636,0.002435967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010527323,0.00040052918,0.0006413773,0.0014870805,0.0008241511,0.0015250338,0.0012548431,0.0012980322,0.0029595967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021950219,0.0003218628,0.00044377713,0.001355177,0.0009116281,0.0025662624,0.0013897172,0.0007500137,0.0010278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055696495,0.00083196536,0.78103995,0.00035632533,0.0004685191,0.00012220634,0.0010633451,0.010263251,0.013462303,0.0007521698,0.003131666,0.18795136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005920761,0.0007668427,0.9656124,0.00009604278,0.00018265354,0.00040292632,0.00072926894,0.020639686,0.0036738012,0.0021185647,0.0056582033,0.000060399845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064084586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0081090955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010527323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007842264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014054291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055674493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077911564","doi":"10.1007/s10531-008-9473-6","title":"Assessing the extent and diversity of riparian ecosystems in Sonora, Mexico","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Archaeology and Natural History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Commission for Environmental Cooperation; Sonoran Joint Venture","keywords":"Riparian zone; Tamarix; Geography; Riparian forest; Ecology; Species richness; Biodiversity; Understory; Willow; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Forestry; Agroforestry; Habitat; Canopy; Biology","score_opus":0.06072260952652995,"score_gpt":0.2659987762025161,"score_spread":0.20527616667598617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077911564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987834,0.00013925027,0.00005765764,0.000034004937,0.000001784908,0.000007686819,0.0002161472,0.0000020824311,0.0007579941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801564,0.00038043436,0.000594822,0.00001331332,0.000004447126,0.000026320886,0.000515465,0.0000018312581,0.0004477925],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997993,0.00004247987,0.000019709209,0.00005446742,0.000033685876,0.000050336384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991423,0.00015791102,0.00037031368,0.00004472929,0.00021114049,0.000073576484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005157219,0.00023049618,0.00021622756,0.0014688428,0.00068995304,0.0006799919,0.000479589,0.0002715735,0.00054358697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014394404,0.00020714193,0.00016104626,0.0013211595,0.00041909123,0.00036748635,0.00078329584,0.00021665102,0.000051052615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060676994,0.000032105156,0.9909904,0.000028084589,0.000065020664,0.00008789036,0.0009508585,0.00019936342,0.00030440692,0.00009806804,0.00019100998,0.0069920146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042801803,0.000014359365,0.99740905,0.00001715462,0.00003253937,0.000030003674,0.001703057,0.00020022347,0.000064265034,0.000021319644,0.0005019139,0.0000019692613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28407764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62398386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28407764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015062555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010825832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56484824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078792541","doi":"10.1007/s10531-014-0843-y","title":"Commonness and rarity determinants of woody plants in different types of tropical forests","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Ecology; Geography; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Habit; Biology","score_opus":0.049764102583851395,"score_gpt":0.19485552352998234,"score_spread":0.14509142094613095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078792541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999795,0.000036288297,0.000023681556,0.000005395991,4.178044e-7,8.0619355e-7,0.000020765965,5.498895e-7,0.00011702884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99986815,0.000018375598,0.00002048027,0.0000018893518,0.0000021851686,7.351606e-7,0.000026377113,5.8793717e-7,0.00006132453],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995962,0.00008699363,0.000032524753,0.00011098655,0.00004481923,0.00012856112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99580836,0.0013793182,0.0013878037,0.00024274655,0.00021456619,0.00096723856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048504208,0.00016763099,0.00024795192,0.001535111,0.00060160534,0.0006654908,0.00038867365,0.00029394313,0.0038321812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018162229,0.00019636286,0.00036196373,0.00094669,0.0009327804,0.0005107022,0.00086003443,0.00037616264,0.00018260308],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011115676,0.000026025959,0.9950375,0.000012466461,0.000061405626,0.00006765599,0.00063523615,0.0000839333,0.0025354377,0.00012056865,0.00001964662,0.0012889487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.803254e-7,0.000016787537,0.99900514,0.000001991666,0.000008787224,0.00008555281,0.00066970027,0.00008632601,0.000046638095,0.000052795196,0.000023586581,0.0000018004464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007379837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020927044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007379837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031270258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022440267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0146737695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081799559","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-9666-6","title":"Rare plants at the extremes of distribution: broadly and narrowly distributed rare species","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Commission for Environmental Cooperation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Endemism; Rare species; Eudicots; Biology; Shrub; Ecology; Habitat; Biodiversity; Herbaceous plant; Taxonomy (biology)","score_opus":0.04053684950276748,"score_gpt":0.18655690415691656,"score_spread":0.14602005465414908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081799559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99631613,0.0005293115,0.0007769943,0.000054667693,0.0000029129212,0.000005696124,0.00006471409,0.000007973093,0.0022415326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995572,0.000065417276,0.00017448934,0.000019737896,0.0000047395797,0.000001993514,0.000058654434,0.0000026592822,0.00011495398],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920696,0.00016369487,0.000040777548,0.00024524488,0.00015936974,0.00018401234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761534,0.0007336228,0.00059034297,0.00014806274,0.00029418874,0.0006184049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010262023,0.00016541776,0.0006842405,0.00286389,0.00094311504,0.0014461784,0.0005780116,0.0004411154,0.0025771654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029929525,0.00017940835,0.00021489759,0.0010633959,0.0017755098,0.0012967909,0.00228674,0.0004977657,0.00025242465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014275587,0.00011471254,0.9279285,0.00013418497,0.00020485697,0.0006059,0.005191996,0.00077040214,0.0225754,0.0038974322,0.00044533657,0.036703754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018816281,0.00014950539,0.9857976,0.000029387098,0.000080323196,0.0013850764,0.0056538363,0.00078530225,0.00058876805,0.004330088,0.0011572455,0.000023981345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028362374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011151614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00286389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036243835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001774723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008621454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083118641","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0092-2","title":"Bryophyte species richness and composition in young forests regenerated after clear-cut logging versus after wildfire and spruce budworm outbreak","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Kungl. Skogs- och Lantbruksakademien","keywords":"Species richness; Bryophyte; Coarse woody debris; Biodiversity; Ecology; Logging; Disturbance (geology); Clearcutting; Deciduous; Secondary forest; Understory; Biology; Habitat; Forestry; Canopy; Geography","score_opus":0.029190640331887438,"score_gpt":0.18269522928600446,"score_spread":0.153504588954117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083118641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99981946,0.000017160508,0.000008526796,8.919755e-7,4.3532273e-7,5.5671194e-7,0.000060323993,5.30636e-7,0.00009205445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957377,0.000016973321,0.00001418952,0.0000027303674,6.214269e-7,0.0000010049807,0.00016502498,5.8959426e-7,0.00022505297],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999083,0.00001418036,0.000007679041,0.000020949941,0.000012854321,0.000036053414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996537,0.00005636006,0.000093008915,0.000015688669,0.000035052937,0.00014631197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017474599,0.00011215376,0.00017024763,0.00056712644,0.00033402658,0.00033332358,0.00013713622,0.00012206618,0.0014059505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003138001,0.000095886746,0.00015631797,0.000274657,0.00023736402,0.00027027115,0.0002899706,0.00016911364,0.00018864937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001114141,0.00009233383,0.9703025,0.000016347016,0.0000505247,0.00019299194,0.00042965822,0.00008883842,0.024768613,0.00004564461,0.00005276388,0.0028456338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011580975,0.000024953877,0.99949837,5.329878e-7,0.00000424108,0.00005606297,0.00013731257,0.000021501024,0.00022495766,0.0000038193048,0.00002641072,7.378965e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055120806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01734447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055120806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021749092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013303432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010959983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084501654","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9035-8","title":"GIS-Based Multicriteria Evaluation and Fuzzy Sets to Identify Priority Sites for Marine Protection","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Marine protected area; Environmental resource management; Marine spatial planning; Marine conservation; Stakeholder; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Decision support system; Business; Scale (ratio); Exclusive economic zone; Environmental planning; Resource (disambiguation); Operations research; Geography; Environmental science; Engineering; Habitat; Fishery; Ecology; Data mining","score_opus":0.04025142147613422,"score_gpt":0.2647359422653353,"score_spread":0.2244845207892011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084501654","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2498127,0.00033402574,0.74317163,0.00019003991,0.00006384338,0.0002443682,0.00047483773,0.00068451307,0.005023972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6757769,0.0000825135,0.32303676,0.00003067841,0.000012248498,0.00015322126,0.00021380298,0.00002941997,0.00066444575],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987017,0.0005057984,0.00014278668,0.00012722731,0.0004516187,0.00007095482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99576783,0.0023268822,0.00037593892,0.00017848628,0.0012449216,0.000105901105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027048602,0.00064325414,0.00084767677,0.004393713,0.0005521394,0.0012251233,0.0007161061,0.000502828,0.0019207827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008523814,0.00042976855,0.0010223575,0.0026069703,0.00050681224,0.00092349196,0.0005458765,0.0003266045,0.00019870567],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014581829,0.00026635482,0.020775931,0.00047710564,0.0005794872,0.00030117348,0.0005739224,0.5764994,0.01496738,0.010975722,0.0027789348,0.37034643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028979499,0.00007052055,0.0027944657,0.000024898904,0.00007538627,0.00006267862,0.00013495721,0.99048245,0.0029320319,0.002917301,0.00045524264,0.000021196678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014659935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016616631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014659935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020381089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010541646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029149234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084682002","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0223-9","title":"Temporal dynamics of aquatic communities and implications for pond conservation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Macrophyte; Species richness; Biodiversity; Invertebrate; Beta diversity; Alpha diversity; Habitat; Gamma diversity; Species diversity; Ecological succession; Biology; Global biodiversity","score_opus":0.03384944027860902,"score_gpt":0.2099424222355877,"score_spread":0.1760929819569787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084682002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928691,0.0010100655,0.0013894952,0.0008059802,0.000009107511,0.0000150616115,0.00095693575,0.000015602116,0.0029285513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986507,0.0003015442,0.00040265964,0.00002993367,0.0000070461087,0.0000146768525,0.00021357171,0.0000034997388,0.00037638986],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996685,0.00010760794,0.000027900824,0.00007549131,0.000054474574,0.00006609571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975026,0.00088207016,0.0007667758,0.00011645081,0.00047391892,0.000258298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015208125,0.00008397522,0.00019752675,0.0012593636,0.00061256514,0.0010948178,0.0003142204,0.00058521994,0.004772531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064273262,0.000198399,0.00018737138,0.0017262874,0.0007677367,0.0018301193,0.0008348997,0.0004513003,0.00031366013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032050684,0.000110715824,0.95950085,0.00009116638,0.000074289346,0.00017135561,0.0016260303,0.0014111354,0.0038350136,0.003505456,0.0012220038,0.028131427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005863745,0.000040862542,0.9908019,0.000019591595,0.000015269305,0.000154034,0.0020410053,0.0030055204,0.00017743059,0.002126447,0.0016004567,0.0000117130985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01209916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035044886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01209916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009383645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005890221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024057448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091554197","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9060-7","title":"Conservation of Aquatic Resources through the Use of Freshwater Protected Areas: Opportunities and Challenges","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Freshwater ecosystem; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Terminology; Environmental planning; Aquatic ecosystem; Freshwater fish; Business; Ecosystem; Ecology; Environmental science; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology","score_opus":0.10051279760314055,"score_gpt":0.1941551390439954,"score_spread":0.09364234144085484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091554197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40969497,0.11890426,0.016702963,0.3248538,0.0011126592,0.00016492466,0.0005880314,0.00009293917,0.12788537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9392284,0.044064134,0.005114747,0.004752257,0.0013027667,0.000111338966,0.00009795232,0.000015071209,0.00531319],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802965,0.0009427379,0.00008333767,0.00015282458,0.00050274533,0.00028869108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963876,0.0014609132,0.000571196,0.00028272156,0.0005380094,0.00075946486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052391896,0.0003791622,0.000618053,0.00090881094,0.0017566902,0.004715613,0.0014183836,0.0018550546,0.0052039786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004990034,0.00015449988,0.0003475053,0.0018107961,0.0046721734,0.0047176885,0.0034299968,0.0012018203,0.00021087019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029502765,0.00045249113,0.09058831,0.0012735942,0.0001735465,0.00058261614,0.0022690224,0.0042696632,0.0027178598,0.12588914,0.02251806,0.7489707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017412474,0.0011351014,0.32637718,0.0025539051,0.00019645935,0.0038282557,0.039792366,0.009512108,0.0017386033,0.33210498,0.28237355,0.00021333477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009173267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022111284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009173267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012024054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004320097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027707815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091639909","doi":"10.1007/s10531-013-0489-1","title":"Effects of prescribed burning and harvesting on ground-dwelling spiders in the Canadian boreal mixedwood forest","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Disturbance (geology); Biodiversity; Ecology; Generalist and specialist species; Salvage logging; Boreal; Prescribed burn; Habitat; Taiga; Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis; Logging; Fauna; Environmental science; Biology; Geography; Snag","score_opus":0.011336463781921307,"score_gpt":0.17732915959447507,"score_spread":0.16599269581255377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091639909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99929285,0.00017509288,0.000008505684,0.000032282136,0.0000024579465,0.00000315637,0.000111925925,0.0000010363832,0.00037265365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99928707,0.00013224041,0.000039428876,0.000032620363,0.0000020092746,0.000002861169,0.00014833518,0.0000012197634,0.00035431952],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950194,0.000074237425,0.000020957288,0.00007478558,0.00011742623,0.00021052652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847144,0.00025464536,0.0002825169,0.000055541506,0.0002967678,0.0006390993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005233969,0.00027482468,0.0003040281,0.00060451345,0.0018729129,0.00078818324,0.00072597817,0.0004000941,0.0016163512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015255837,0.00023388593,0.0003017474,0.0007820495,0.001293384,0.00030449833,0.0006493831,0.0004256938,0.000101291684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078409945,0.00016776838,0.9876431,0.00004070427,0.00014701445,0.00013921384,0.0010943884,0.00029502815,0.0022858977,0.00008089894,0.00038113704,0.0069407634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024942176,0.000013728523,0.99924845,0.0000024328958,0.000007954839,0.0000151512595,0.0005387621,0.00004256049,0.000025734233,0.0000054737343,0.00009456218,0.0000025494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9555292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044470787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008871489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059945392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08946532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091690152","doi":"10.1007/s10531-009-9682-7","title":"In the dark in a large urban park: DNA barcodes illuminate cryptic and introduced moth species","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Royal British Columbia Museum; Canadian Forest Service; Canadian Food Inspection Agency; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"DNA barcoding; Biodiversity; Lepidoptera genitalia; Species complex; Biology; Ecology; Species diversity; Introduced species; Geography; Phylogenetic tree","score_opus":0.01287887977487826,"score_gpt":0.2019085133020304,"score_spread":0.18902963352715216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091690152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99863404,0.000118355805,0.00027312056,0.00034594524,0.00001604672,0.000009866798,0.000060726252,0.000010884025,0.000531023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977737,0.00006971369,0.001139961,0.00014880484,0.000021309119,0.000007884278,0.000061598505,0.0000037117165,0.00077323534],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970347,0.00011802154,0.000005284507,0.000058358517,0.000050103787,0.00006483838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929583,0.00009855083,0.00015351544,0.000037162397,0.00013059998,0.0002843261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003309112,0.00025749527,0.00022604437,0.00057382934,0.0020762812,0.00078301074,0.0006753825,0.00072923367,0.0020760421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065378065,0.00035441486,0.00012879178,0.00052858115,0.0014838101,0.0009331097,0.0011596688,0.00088957767,0.0002851349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079979596,0.0005491295,0.9055637,0.00013858484,0.000118286865,0.0016003113,0.010487069,0.00030775552,0.029731037,0.00033928058,0.0025831189,0.04778195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003149662,0.00033103256,0.9615255,0.000052242933,0.00007044518,0.0013424034,0.02939114,0.0012462997,0.0016413514,0.00047397267,0.003865404,0.00002870736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026344698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2311832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026344698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006405932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008689641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052382708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092002070","doi":"10.1007/s10531-007-9266-3","title":"A private management approach to coral reef conservation in Sabah, Malaysia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Marine protected area; Business; Coral reef; Fishery; Poaching; Marine conservation; Coral reef protection; Guardian; Enforcement; Biodiversity; Fishing; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Wildlife; Habitat; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.018458374994353342,"score_gpt":0.1913322887649206,"score_spread":0.17287391377056724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092002070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97980154,0.00041872825,0.000561352,0.0055109044,0.000033998385,0.00005848954,0.00006221502,0.000008833581,0.013543947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98879844,0.00031564056,0.0005169241,0.00030949066,0.000010344984,0.000033143533,0.000021185819,0.0000016497322,0.0099931685],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995721,0.00019197281,0.00002516433,0.000025304005,0.000050014045,0.00013539524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991673,0.00012218468,0.0001891881,0.00004268955,0.000108128595,0.00037053527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008184548,0.00013844062,0.00007058701,0.0004425603,0.0021210155,0.0012681724,0.0005589595,0.0008175654,0.0035689468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010170969,0.00021796755,0.00009503118,0.00041702748,0.0010582297,0.0011301097,0.0013543759,0.00058255316,0.00015582923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001048095,0.0015464402,0.5748417,0.0007505735,0.00011421704,0.006807949,0.03762846,0.0065187863,0.009907997,0.08221631,0.011871738,0.26674786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013239168,0.0013882128,0.78775716,0.0006847805,0.000071513605,0.0036710487,0.09399267,0.009884363,0.0019155836,0.008535061,0.0918791,0.00008804095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028593943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.109744295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028593943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037800702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009162278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056855023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093012463","doi":"10.1007/s10531-012-0406-z","title":"The use of geographic information systems to map and assess ecosystem services","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canmore Museum and Geoscience Centre","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem management; Geographic information system; Ecosystem; Total human ecosystem; Context (archaeology); Land use; Ecosystem health; Biodiversity; Spatial contextual awareness; Strengths and weaknesses; Business; Geography; Remote sensing; Environmental science; Ecology","score_opus":0.025103342930876182,"score_gpt":0.18216800009018885,"score_spread":0.15706465715931267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093012463","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14770584,0.027150087,0.6819485,0.026185319,0.0009656647,0.00043873323,0.010546813,0.0020769055,0.10298217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6056967,0.017877378,0.36862376,0.0012534965,0.00035771748,0.00016886051,0.0029244747,0.00012894715,0.0029686764],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965946,0.0017256169,0.0002460247,0.00026281193,0.0010650676,0.00010586962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836345,0.010852526,0.0016346796,0.0017486223,0.0018006676,0.000329087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006367027,0.00057160686,0.00046787944,0.008599906,0.0006059579,0.0047367285,0.00092681876,0.0009841964,0.002482678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021909457,0.00034892213,0.0005677831,0.010486048,0.0013999175,0.008044203,0.002202976,0.0013175457,0.00056471134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010203597,0.00015716616,0.054772392,0.0007908417,0.0005002195,0.00013462943,0.0009867875,0.03003178,0.0016712693,0.1732464,0.01937167,0.7182347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006831717,0.00021821001,0.05849975,0.0012176257,0.000536674,0.0006234523,0.0037346361,0.18669403,0.0043736435,0.5783756,0.16540287,0.00025520605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015840461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018711897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015840461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019188593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021599394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033672452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095738279","doi":"10.1007/s10531-015-1018-1","title":"Canada and Aichi Biodiversity Target 11: understanding ‘other effective area-based conservation measures’ in the context of the broader target","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University; Yukon Department of Environment; Dalhousie University; Government of Northwest Territories; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on Biological Diversity; Operationalization; Biodiversity; Context (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Convention; Biodiversity conservation; Business; Inclusion (mineral); Corporate governance; Diversity (politics); Political science; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.038151483860835916,"score_gpt":0.1808075313383901,"score_spread":0.14265604747755417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095738279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22307193,0.0057132095,0.018974436,0.14711703,0.0005788024,0.0009077341,0.0016160873,0.000108153654,0.6019125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9445574,0.0017654556,0.016389998,0.011363824,0.000059133126,0.00036905793,0.0005920841,0.00005222478,0.024850832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9740623,0.004934615,0.0007323833,0.0013530976,0.013037463,0.00588026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96289355,0.010720407,0.0018626263,0.0010056263,0.017654074,0.0058637955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016950537,0.00051284686,0.00043423686,0.0032175744,0.015326649,0.013001281,0.002834157,0.0029383977,0.00532149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03073555,0.00038160372,0.0005789834,0.0052096546,0.013820507,0.0041183145,0.0051238965,0.0048727673,0.00028032027],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010891107,0.00011868567,0.042260204,0.0008960954,0.000064495674,0.0009302531,0.13961649,0.0041388487,0.0013419081,0.64873093,0.06996733,0.091825865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034794266,0.00009459144,0.12697427,0.0016538416,0.00006756304,0.0001858247,0.20486204,0.0048769484,0.00121241,0.052197937,0.60754323,0.00029648407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9896826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99495643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19063026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19063026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36338225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9387542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096993717","doi":"10.1023/a:1021398729516","title":"Assessing New Zealand fern diversity from spatial predictions of species assemblages","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Species richness; Biodiversity; Ecology; Fern; Global biodiversity; Spatial ecology; Species diversity; Evapotranspiration; Indicator value; Landform; Geography; Environmental science; Physical geography; Biology; Cartography","score_opus":0.07878484041140245,"score_gpt":0.22106030446050623,"score_spread":0.1422754640491038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096993717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995379,0.000076970835,0.0030089386,0.000056121942,0.000002633991,0.0000136955005,0.00038363156,0.000023134235,0.0010559214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963349,0.000054090484,0.0029710259,0.000005156851,0.0000024719868,0.000013140014,0.00044000676,0.0000047452613,0.00017446041],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951434,0.00015664798,0.000029886272,0.00012596133,0.0001259289,0.000047239602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971795,0.0015529711,0.0005301965,0.00024446315,0.0003651002,0.00012782318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017351867,0.00033835936,0.00035655522,0.0009770399,0.00043570157,0.0008438669,0.0005561774,0.00044516072,0.0014113636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008899608,0.000422153,0.00048843387,0.000948568,0.00045866537,0.001397804,0.00075804454,0.00036521346,0.00024943482],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029773967,0.00005875626,0.88395953,0.000062692925,0.00025287812,0.0001078244,0.0002471861,0.08650923,0.0014189142,0.00041234752,0.00028302186,0.02638995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004546464,0.000120081095,0.7548811,0.000017383982,0.00013252137,0.00013618045,0.00054512423,0.24110551,0.0007199968,0.0015712302,0.0007005167,0.000024875579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15930521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23747711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15930521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016965759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009575635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3167559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097044442","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0059-3","title":"Human-disturbance and caterpillars in managed forest fragments","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Quadrat; Caterpillar; Ecology; Habitat; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Lepidoptera genitalia; Secondary forest; Forest restoration; Predation; Biology; Geography; Forest ecology; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.02296373061820907,"score_gpt":0.19566445366374974,"score_spread":0.17270072304554068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097044442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99973065,0.000068342015,0.000008062281,0.0000060535626,8.18443e-7,8.3182414e-7,0.000034925095,5.7075647e-7,0.0001496928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996965,0.00003438633,0.000014244182,0.000005103561,0.0000015360598,0.0000012845893,0.000055945617,5.3278444e-7,0.00019040395],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979514,0.000051400777,0.000013061333,0.000031901345,0.000028201479,0.0000801713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991254,0.00012117834,0.00039868584,0.000057898877,0.000057137844,0.00023964979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032399572,0.00015374714,0.00015937808,0.00075337756,0.0007971898,0.00058421405,0.00048589124,0.00028020056,0.0021557924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009987159,0.00016790407,0.00020090645,0.0007385,0.0007519224,0.00034436697,0.00055461173,0.00022642639,0.00018730349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029966605,0.000077406454,0.9946555,0.000013274457,0.00009807692,0.00017633771,0.00083250814,0.00013950233,0.00069159304,0.000064080035,0.000104812956,0.0028472946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019838953,0.000029573166,0.9992632,0.0000017619235,0.0000073944198,0.00007935154,0.00045254387,0.00004378712,0.00002858814,0.000012375201,0.000078021025,0.0000012999044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059271626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24195474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059271626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090070796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025360525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.117853284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097967078","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-2120-y","title":"Short-term effects of experimental boreal forest &amp;logging disturbance on bumble bees, bumble &amp;bee-pollinated flowers and the bee–flower match","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Apidae; Pollinator; Pollination; Ecology; Hymenoptera; Pollen","score_opus":0.029409108797152198,"score_gpt":0.2079079662020241,"score_spread":0.1784988574048719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097967078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995521,0.00004798011,0.00002197555,0.000016478181,0.00001249749,0.0000064149795,0.00016023127,0.00000384878,0.00017851732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855775,0.000036547757,0.000060691735,0.00003705825,0.000014583002,0.000034009383,0.00039801912,0.0000047392678,0.0008564231],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996624,0.00007060087,0.000029196945,0.00009036278,0.000031553653,0.00011583849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707365,0.00081740326,0.0005742779,0.0002055474,0.00019135476,0.0011377194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031800682,0.00045718515,0.00071116054,0.00040104362,0.0008521236,0.00078244053,0.00052920525,0.00057781243,0.00442569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014342525,0.000284939,0.00031656394,0.0002629466,0.0012183854,0.00059360627,0.0007795313,0.0009064539,0.000313314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.22307193,0.034308456,0.37809426,0.0004362273,0.00087657326,0.00096446706,0.0014726422,0.001501815,0.31755334,0.0003519263,0.0021397166,0.039228678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026574713,0.008135096,0.9806968,0.000013894492,0.00012769707,0.00008410258,0.00054138264,0.00067540404,0.0088194795,0.00008352014,0.00052631885,0.000030437142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009379538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0344282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009379538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097439374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050878705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018649876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099116655","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-9663-9","title":"Invasion risks posed by the aquarium trade and live fish markets on the Laurentian Great Lakes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":204,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Macrophyte; Fishery; Introduced species; Biodiversity; Invasive species; Ecology; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.0309324694945509,"score_gpt":0.2033484150052228,"score_spread":0.1724159455106719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099116655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99897003,0.000025980302,0.000008729759,0.00016688484,0.0000010813652,7.2281364e-7,0.00001478025,5.5531467e-7,0.00081134506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994223,0.00002965402,0.000014742053,0.000024247449,0.0000024960034,0.0000015369938,0.000012371258,4.3605215e-7,0.000492148],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996916,0.00010271697,0.000008108261,0.000023757028,0.00006288119,0.000110895664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990392,0.00020530427,0.00037039624,0.000021551527,0.000078653255,0.00028495956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040581377,0.00017304726,0.0001289958,0.00045253,0.0009616764,0.0009873662,0.00032740913,0.000701395,0.0025300258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016232274,0.00017845242,0.00019717882,0.00033489388,0.0014351535,0.0007810906,0.001615246,0.000512614,0.00009023753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010226055,0.00014924844,0.9687317,0.000029248988,0.000093678194,0.0019301692,0.0064086276,0.0035851002,0.0028143935,0.0026201077,0.0019756476,0.01063951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013579409,0.000097199976,0.9875403,0.000011356088,0.000016804992,0.00019791954,0.008711999,0.0017957415,0.00018434745,0.00051789783,0.00090000674,0.000012799947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10124086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42981842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8987591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023606578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20130318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100122110","doi":"10.1007/s10531-009-9694-3","title":"Tree size and herbivory determine below-canopy grass quality and species composition in savannahs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kruger (Canada)","funders":"South African National Parks; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; A.F.W. Schimper-Stiftung für Ökologische Forschungen","keywords":"Herbivore; Grazing; Biology; Herbaceous plant; Canopy; Ecology; Biodiversity; Tree canopy; Woody plant; Species richness; Shrubland; Ecosystem; Agronomy","score_opus":0.025640419071009425,"score_gpt":0.22926225357109595,"score_spread":0.20362183450008653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100122110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99992347,0.000014883213,0.000010106343,0.0000020293267,2.4741175e-7,2.5220635e-7,0.000004209974,3.5712057e-7,0.000044416625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999869,0.00001156029,0.00003284914,0.0000038947965,0.0000010477914,7.603662e-7,0.000016811478,6.9938886e-7,0.00006327504],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985576,0.00006295446,0.0000067997885,0.0000204085,0.000020166024,0.000033870692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989661,0.00040351652,0.00022679781,0.000046973368,0.00007523552,0.0002814384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004523262,0.000182578,0.00019472584,0.0005626399,0.00041038604,0.0003903913,0.00021309307,0.00026305794,0.00090359576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011038076,0.0002513509,0.00019181114,0.00028964455,0.000530258,0.00034182696,0.00031588532,0.00019506295,0.00011506452],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022880158,0.00006643999,0.99070776,0.000009040539,0.000060905124,0.000063301246,0.00037561907,0.000070762384,0.007170949,0.000044156255,0.00002202785,0.001180168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.3080814e-7,0.000018751885,0.99961877,4.7253408e-7,0.0000044337567,0.00003906041,0.00012666972,0.00009482927,0.000060835657,0.00002127146,0.000012955921,8.66627e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006596962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02921757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006596962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018378072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018995146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013117135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104789650","doi":"10.1023/a:1015500513603","title":"Endemism, diversity, and the threat of tropical moist forest extinctions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Society; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Endemism; Geography; Biodiversity; Threatened species; Ecology; Species richness; Global biodiversity; Habitat destruction; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.024192252879639223,"score_gpt":0.18510969307954314,"score_spread":0.16091744019990392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104789650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99391127,0.0006224528,0.00011194361,0.00048609916,0.0000046162104,0.0000014216508,0.000048910515,0.0000015408608,0.004811739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99968874,0.00015935612,0.000018423534,0.000018120612,0.000009628449,5.5658603e-7,0.0000119218275,2.1758134e-7,0.00009291403],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984634,0.000061352264,0.000007937177,0.000015201544,0.000034368466,0.00003473329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977932,0.000831061,0.0008049037,0.00006640594,0.00015201588,0.00035244264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078852737,0.000101505575,0.00009856298,0.000804476,0.00041279852,0.00072047993,0.00016875587,0.000268,0.0015733278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004423115,0.000065627464,0.00009895994,0.00052582513,0.0011746953,0.0007478348,0.00056235795,0.00044703137,0.0000516397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017612409,0.000054361408,0.96821946,0.000042859538,0.00009543354,0.00026727706,0.0010223966,0.0024683576,0.0007803978,0.0072824266,0.0004959439,0.019094892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059342706,0.00006181064,0.99007785,0.000017399776,0.000021831704,0.00023486206,0.0011756696,0.0018862745,0.00006797472,0.005400537,0.0010448297,0.0000049885716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003485163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008651192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003485163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004369548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017395931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006929755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110210180","doi":"10.1023/a:1008937017058","title":"Leaf litter inhabiting beetles as surrogates for establishing priorities for conservation of selected tropical montane cloud forests in Honduras, Central America (Coleoptera; Staphylinidae, Curculionidae)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Museum of Nature","funders":"","keywords":"Endemism; Curculionidae; Species richness; Biology; Ecology; Biodiversity; Species diversity; Geography","score_opus":0.011170000611183886,"score_gpt":0.21210795906001814,"score_spread":0.20093795844883425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110210180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996916,0.000031879375,0.000053368352,0.0000028842212,8.2664906e-7,0.000011359398,0.00003607545,9.232109e-7,0.00017101408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992124,0.00003155699,0.0005372183,0.000008015197,7.816063e-7,0.000012917387,0.000086198444,5.284276e-7,0.000110315756],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997367,0.00013494081,0.000015608306,0.000037818187,0.000036172853,0.000038702616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990814,0.00019675825,0.0004012842,0.000039026945,0.00012202825,0.0001594625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075215206,0.00033064975,0.00019463174,0.00071357633,0.00051719556,0.00052772986,0.0002768882,0.0002116251,0.00033550538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013406166,0.000111839356,0.000089383335,0.00039804267,0.00027819324,0.00027423183,0.00027160972,0.00022009457,0.000052209733],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000528545,0.00024273788,0.9806143,0.000039009632,0.00004156619,0.00007840694,0.0010448971,0.00022780964,0.0094119115,0.000055810597,0.00006383132,0.007651155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011772003,0.00037864601,0.9968183,0.000008565237,0.000028974886,0.00004217699,0.0011172582,0.00061555224,0.00080938207,0.00003029701,0.00013588268,0.000003164282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038763665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23440808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038763665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006408396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002895697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07707608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113607148","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0072-6","title":"Predicting spatial occurrence of beetles and pseudoscorpions in hollow oaks in southeastern Sweden","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Occupancy; Threatened species; Ecology; Biodiversity; Habitat; Geography; Endangered species; IUCN Red List; Biology","score_opus":0.04906310789592827,"score_gpt":0.19597123536616487,"score_spread":0.1469081274702366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113607148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99983466,0.000024641166,0.000026068115,0.000003608658,7.986335e-7,6.391834e-7,0.00005177717,0.0000014060917,0.000056323996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935967,0.000045709912,0.00015664122,0.000003772827,0.0000013458691,0.000002645511,0.00030567712,0.0000016346355,0.00012294442],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997732,0.000052783107,0.00003015147,0.00006233479,0.000026543343,0.000054900716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899703,0.00038541856,0.00023487725,0.00004906215,0.00016416289,0.00016958216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035151065,0.00028742678,0.00026137865,0.0010614439,0.0004359365,0.000770226,0.00031691272,0.00040982777,0.0005099798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010735804,0.0002780792,0.00039106194,0.0005704943,0.00028992773,0.0003442396,0.0005681,0.00019041041,0.00019940907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006343026,0.000019954747,0.9971763,0.000007699699,0.000033569697,0.000072295465,0.000241132,0.0005321124,0.00045362703,0.00001329587,0.000045215635,0.0013415131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024509814,0.000020778438,0.99707615,0.000009899561,0.000023052688,0.00007676334,0.001114125,0.0014686884,0.00008759937,0.000021328935,0.00009620386,0.0000029946514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.086646356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21449716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086646356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004660082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004769378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.172284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116653411","doi":"10.1007/s10531-007-9151-0","title":"Do tree-level monocultures develop following Canadian boreal silviculture? Tree-level diversity tested using a new method","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Ontario Forest Research Institute; Lakehead University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Monoculture; Species evenness; Species richness; Black spruce; Biodiversity; Taiga; Diversity index; Ecology; Forestry; Species diversity; Silviculture; Vegetation (pathology); Dominance (genetics); Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.06302361987208058,"score_gpt":0.2651202125897471,"score_spread":0.20209659271766653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116653411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99807066,0.0001183327,0.00037814537,0.000014457921,0.000004643989,0.00003159602,0.00019977224,0.000005543252,0.0011769445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774605,0.00007100412,0.0012195894,0.000021996259,0.0000043956156,0.000046061155,0.00023795346,0.0000034282064,0.0006494893],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990073,0.00012086811,0.00004015781,0.0002449472,0.00035866484,0.00022807713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971386,0.00046709875,0.00066386635,0.00022477955,0.0010454701,0.00046014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012817046,0.00032430165,0.0003743689,0.0017108831,0.0025875045,0.0009430399,0.001154825,0.00036378475,0.0015346103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031281628,0.00026049273,0.00043654113,0.0018279266,0.0010990571,0.0006962549,0.0008537638,0.0005128759,0.000107173444],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000761125,0.00018923904,0.9638665,0.000055382603,0.00023008359,0.00008915173,0.002429837,0.0004885748,0.012694662,0.00027298724,0.00026882318,0.018653624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069615485,0.00006867454,0.9982488,0.0000029866897,0.000028738183,0.000024489276,0.0005270836,0.0004012283,0.00037465716,0.000029673653,0.0002793955,0.0000073322663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8374864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95333517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16251361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007877944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048981817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3269413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119587836","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-0446-0","title":"Presence and Abundance of Birds in an Atlantic Forest Reserve and Adjacent Plantation of Shade-Grown Yerba Mate, in Paraguay","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Association of Field Ornithologists","keywords":"Understory; Abundance (ecology); Threatened species; Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Secondary forest; Agroforestry; Canopy; Bird conservation","score_opus":0.016859345475144824,"score_gpt":0.21911855606235653,"score_spread":0.2022592105872117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119587836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997309,0.000029964389,0.0000090650055,0.000010031932,8.6477814e-7,0.0000015317298,0.00007576288,7.1313417e-7,0.00014117754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99967885,0.0000376106,0.00003770275,0.0000075672256,0.0000012497007,0.0000036527686,0.000092782495,4.7075562e-7,0.00014008938],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989593,0.000016856948,0.000008592289,0.00002932612,0.00001398718,0.00003533467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999691,0.0000348853,0.00009606738,0.000012442071,0.000058846745,0.00010681317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013419987,0.00017032151,0.00019669003,0.0006647431,0.00083437044,0.0003898095,0.00039855338,0.00032665493,0.0006942036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038399416,0.00024059124,0.00015999017,0.00059406814,0.0005523167,0.00034161276,0.0005036538,0.00020761846,0.00011338153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118667755,0.000042710937,0.9950264,0.000016557062,0.00003057354,0.00021040853,0.0015670039,0.000057607034,0.0015542349,0.000028697064,0.00009558621,0.0012515413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023868063,0.000024987015,0.99827766,0.0000022938414,0.0000058480687,0.00007527428,0.0014243724,0.00008545171,0.000040172745,0.0000062073927,0.00005392693,0.0000014619516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27432516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5380454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27432516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000995458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004732294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5454568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126266065","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9027-8","title":"Core and Satellite Species in Degraded Habitats: an Analysis Using Malagasy Tree Communities","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Understory; Ecology; Species richness; Biodiversity; Vegetation (pathology); Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis; Fragmentation (computing); Disturbance (geology); Geography; Habitat; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Habitat fragmentation; Abundance (ecology); Local extinction; Relative species abundance; Species diversity; Biology; Canopy; Biological dispersal; Population","score_opus":0.05883224401768745,"score_gpt":0.22846161710955193,"score_spread":0.1696293730918645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126266065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998048,0.000031195217,0.000051597384,0.0000041998273,2.1524131e-7,0.0000020405525,0.000044713855,6.832029e-7,0.00006054737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994567,0.0000350785,0.00022737254,0.000005350886,0.0000012461529,0.000009678084,0.00019709607,0.0000017462241,0.00006580902],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993801,0.00029693422,0.000036191206,0.00010648819,0.00008301261,0.00009719199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99619234,0.0020936339,0.00070187624,0.00023130307,0.000405159,0.000375716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009941676,0.00024144011,0.00041500197,0.0020432957,0.0014843479,0.00091571885,0.000418639,0.0003350852,0.0014633602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048681265,0.00020349136,0.00038078352,0.0028586686,0.0008165731,0.0008610352,0.0012703006,0.00025215212,0.00011273061],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014856935,0.000034392084,0.98999596,0.000032700817,0.00011039062,0.000120430486,0.0027348727,0.00061438733,0.0009579765,0.00011872384,0.00006981098,0.0050616576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003112111,0.000046986475,0.9944687,0.0000061750984,0.00004397681,0.00017087262,0.002234084,0.0026863033,0.00010751353,0.000040016603,0.00018825535,0.000004049481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048616093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1116878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048616093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007062363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003471864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09666622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131405420","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9137-3","title":"The Berger–Parker index as an effective tool for monitoring the biodiversity of disturbed soils: a case study on Mediterranean oribatid (Acari: Oribatida) assemblages","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Study of Mite Species","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Oribatida; Biodiversity; Mediterranean climate; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Acari; Abundance (ecology); Ecosystem; Environmental science; Soil water; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.03455387145070255,"score_gpt":0.24390472566259208,"score_spread":0.20935085421188954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131405420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972414,0.00025118145,0.0009855756,0.00003145359,0.0000045581737,0.000039789284,0.00006436376,0.000008973476,0.0013727108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964791,0.00013426326,0.0031208913,0.000008799981,0.000005932848,0.000015798794,0.000035672405,0.0000025753416,0.00019690451],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899584,0.0006233882,0.000050371003,0.00007022621,0.00021225479,0.000047994086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983929,0.0007898482,0.0002702574,0.00011769124,0.0002688851,0.0001603964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018150613,0.0004103876,0.0004031328,0.002394347,0.00054040627,0.0005641212,0.00050005194,0.0004950551,0.0007040711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025585892,0.00018500106,0.00027729187,0.0014931167,0.0004896851,0.0005354859,0.00039209728,0.00027690904,0.00013709633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039336583,0.00018693315,0.9258657,0.00010995156,0.00009084184,0.0014169782,0.0013693934,0.0006767078,0.012480377,0.0001490351,0.0002548748,0.05700589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017075328,0.0007563753,0.98799986,0.00001695174,0.00007240682,0.0025790108,0.0012694498,0.0035999438,0.0024643464,0.00015900352,0.0010374321,0.000028266686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004802771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015899802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004802771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036275017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021514996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00959909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131499500","doi":"10.1007/s10531-012-0366-3","title":"Multiscale assessment of the influence of habitat structure and composition on bird assemblages in boreal forest","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Ducks Unlimited Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Biodiversity; Boreal; Threatened species; Taiga; Deciduous; Spatial ecology; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.009652723283223282,"score_gpt":0.2226484432328431,"score_spread":0.21299571994961983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131499500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99974984,0.000019549027,0.0001331205,0.0000050938256,5.4710597e-7,9.643413e-7,0.000014349591,0.000002453954,0.000074148986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99980015,0.0000066059897,0.00015446855,0.0000028010068,0.0000013370089,0.0000012324858,0.000019845535,9.716294e-7,0.000012663153],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979264,0.00006439374,0.000013468461,0.000062438565,0.00003584995,0.000031191474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999154,0.00036890453,0.00020331598,0.00006310948,0.000062098174,0.00014866916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060108583,0.00018157903,0.00031805047,0.0005422762,0.00036698574,0.0005790242,0.0002500601,0.00023943675,0.00049906457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016674466,0.00022694771,0.0003342786,0.00023086964,0.0004826735,0.00046834975,0.0005188,0.00021274328,0.000043106524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034929323,0.00013003164,0.9628398,0.000029392852,0.00028162042,0.000118705386,0.00026516436,0.0049587702,0.02257353,0.00017017988,0.00008644793,0.008197045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020130717,0.000023001832,0.996067,7.9418743e-7,0.000012840952,0.00002111969,0.0000613687,0.0036747397,0.000091527996,0.000028334673,0.000014481046,0.0000027924807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010818301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03356567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010818301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034312363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014214368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02151066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133873177","doi":"10.1007/s10531-005-5819-5","title":"Conservation Targets for Viable Species Assemblages in Canada: Are Percentage Targets Appropriate?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Set-aside; National park; Biodiversity; Persistence (discontinuity); Selection (genetic algorithm); Nature reserve; Ecology; Representation (politics); Geography; Biology; Biodiversity conservation; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.012209380571281554,"score_gpt":0.17112995137042278,"score_spread":0.15892057079914124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133873177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7278735,0.014153161,0.03851226,0.053635906,0.0013501567,0.00046162898,0.011502405,0.0006899359,0.15182105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878203,0.0011140396,0.0057409815,0.0014099827,0.000060739087,0.00010651607,0.0005345256,0.000050438,0.003162389],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99300134,0.0014831495,0.0003151141,0.00035835168,0.0038967824,0.0009452841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845979,0.0034518,0.0022134844,0.00048653418,0.008186107,0.0010641204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064896992,0.00039548922,0.000684611,0.0017056073,0.0023445394,0.0022046105,0.0017827192,0.0011044035,0.0028406708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0359451,0.00030012924,0.00027376632,0.00294558,0.0014482621,0.002574633,0.0010126266,0.0012932442,0.00038424117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010922116,0.00025910698,0.30140376,0.0013018135,0.00036040405,0.00027558685,0.0059962603,0.026263962,0.0044499757,0.07034372,0.07939635,0.5088568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009104586,0.0003688332,0.894238,0.0009885174,0.0002431544,0.00035452115,0.0068425504,0.017537521,0.0029585254,0.030252334,0.046009224,0.00011586111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8243818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92912555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17561817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014539104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018193964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3533048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134717010","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0127-8","title":"Biodiversity conservation in old-growth boreal forest: black spruce and balsam fir snags harbour distinct assemblages of saproxylic beetles","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Université Laval; Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Snag; Balsam; Biodiversity; Ecology; Taiga; Black spruce; Biology; Coarse woody debris; Forest ecology; Forest management; Abies balsamea; Forestry; Geography; Agroforestry; Ecosystem; Habitat; Botany","score_opus":0.03533603035250082,"score_gpt":0.1891768797037396,"score_spread":0.15384084935123876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134717010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99926215,0.00016696024,0.000066350156,0.00001414824,0.0000030027602,0.0000024152855,0.000030328045,0.0000032017633,0.00045130882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952054,0.00005376024,0.00018452425,0.000015842696,0.0000051600896,0.0000019011351,0.00007252018,0.0000011132242,0.00014476902],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997565,0.000051458035,0.000012515399,0.00006171956,0.000046385987,0.00007140461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994536,0.000040914114,0.00021887415,0.000042025924,0.00008464053,0.0001599988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006080023,0.00030852275,0.00022574604,0.00086545513,0.00082734285,0.0008516812,0.0003809175,0.00018340383,0.00062828505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056366273,0.000121087265,0.00010598811,0.00041009663,0.00079548964,0.00068606157,0.00049672223,0.00019800176,0.000072166615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003790942,0.00011188299,0.962463,0.00005744958,0.000078976605,0.000099269084,0.0010193768,0.00015365599,0.017892107,0.00016211718,0.00024806187,0.017334973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028324732,0.000035911504,0.9990396,0.0000031513594,0.000009427451,0.000051059964,0.00033797047,0.000057110217,0.00022260364,0.000036445243,0.00020209365,0.0000017123027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015230674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08930273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015230674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005543623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027508626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030284047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141085885","doi":"10.1007/s10531-010-9797-x","title":"Bee communities (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) of small Iowa hill prairies are as diverse and rich as those of large prairie preserves","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Forb; Species richness; Ecology; Biodiversity; Species evenness; Geography; Gamma diversity; Species diversity; Habitat; Plant community; Range (aeronautics); Grassland; Alpha diversity; Biology","score_opus":0.06008678188990898,"score_gpt":0.2196294742110336,"score_spread":0.1595426923211246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141085885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99940646,0.00005052057,0.000093410126,0.000014157059,7.846426e-7,0.000005603678,0.00006666852,0.0000017658704,0.00036046712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988103,0.00011564156,0.00037131342,0.000030172283,0.0000019666152,0.00001124134,0.00015323158,0.00000217667,0.00050405035],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976057,0.00006182402,0.000016974713,0.00007138262,0.000049818376,0.0000394675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927443,0.00019477562,0.00022035638,0.00006103806,0.00010261136,0.00014688085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003687341,0.00014857388,0.00022470583,0.00088905694,0.001017695,0.00062015303,0.0002901329,0.00018050912,0.0017775487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087407866,0.00031072306,0.00008938223,0.00054681563,0.0007561399,0.0006604972,0.0006492646,0.0002498247,0.00021137828],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015152867,0.00015014313,0.95217615,0.00007083844,0.00010233903,0.00014895198,0.008167487,0.0000862516,0.021565074,0.00013626991,0.00028014902,0.016964857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023974544,0.00002852207,0.99634653,0.000004144872,0.00000888365,0.000054253444,0.0030660857,0.000057445588,0.00012943156,0.000026155158,0.00027309096,0.0000029552145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049241163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41869083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049241163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004490583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042913298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09790909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142116500","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-6064-z","title":"Searching for biodiversity indicators in running waters: do bryophytes, macroinvertebrates, and fish show congruent diversity patterns?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Biodiversity; Ecology; River ecosystem; Invertebrate; Habitat; Biota; Taxonomic rank; Taxon; Bryophyte; Species diversity; Dominance (genetics); Beta diversity; Biology","score_opus":0.01616261231592719,"score_gpt":0.19746007733709384,"score_spread":0.18129746502116664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142116500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990688,0.00016435138,0.00026721906,0.00009692359,0.000003558036,0.000001781982,0.00004408541,0.0000029952926,0.00035023427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99929464,0.000096472184,0.0004206697,0.00003966701,0.000006112081,0.0000033379295,0.00007992968,0.0000019706372,0.0000573352],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999608,0.0001401857,0.000030392259,0.00007507522,0.00007465918,0.00007170419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980572,0.00057680754,0.0007467755,0.00009685242,0.00019635494,0.0003259832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013379176,0.00024770785,0.0003950167,0.0010135706,0.00045272824,0.00086771266,0.00039521596,0.00057251164,0.00083582266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049539832,0.0001926159,0.00022914441,0.0012777215,0.00067481823,0.0014503691,0.0005729088,0.00034083918,0.0001591087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059667367,0.0000138424775,0.9920149,0.000016485272,0.000051157444,0.000016124122,0.00020432226,0.000038171605,0.0010672768,0.00004735791,0.00005027209,0.0064204745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004076193,0.00006484895,0.99819726,0.000009080055,0.00003466367,0.00004942131,0.00076044386,0.0003114136,0.00023530754,0.00022201754,0.00010720086,0.0000042785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004310581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01660905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004310581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017686246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036718414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008570969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143084295","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-7845-0","title":"Do we need species-specific guidelines for catch-and-release recreational angling to effectively conserve diverse fishery resources?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":462,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts","keywords":"Fishing; Catch and release; Recreational fishing; Fishery; Recreation; Fisheries management; Biodiversity; Business; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.06248860060325981,"score_gpt":0.24519059996493897,"score_spread":0.18270199936167916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143084295","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0720669,0.013393878,0.09438959,0.7379132,0.010528848,0.0011982733,0.0015595116,0.002189399,0.06676044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32608184,0.009061713,0.4301061,0.21570781,0.002010436,0.0031412658,0.0009500472,0.0006126279,0.012328228],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887383,0.0045882473,0.0020288837,0.00052517315,0.0031451187,0.0009742909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93397117,0.016730772,0.008898027,0.0038041112,0.030656194,0.0059397533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034029227,0.0009816254,0.0016932897,0.0018776595,0.003067045,0.0029496835,0.0044863652,0.008568671,0.0044192197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08472594,0.0006875873,0.0010932263,0.0015926409,0.0039411234,0.0070076697,0.0021110273,0.0067615258,0.0019516802],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021675383,0.0017865214,0.08173968,0.0017800808,0.00038935532,0.000689457,0.0033254642,0.005371284,0.0042574303,0.03109288,0.44233537,0.42701575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047458286,0.0012375683,0.22079298,0.014233285,0.000995643,0.0029297613,0.030280564,0.018214755,0.0058235433,0.13192487,0.5721089,0.0009835714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024656491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11803337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034029227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022954687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01434472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17996591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146147595","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-2137-2","title":"Mapping the spatial distribution of plant diversity indices in a tropical forest using multi-spectral satellite image classification and field measurements","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Quadrat; Alpha diversity; Beta diversity; Vegetation (pathology); Gamma diversity; Diversity index; Biodiversity; Ecology; Species diversity; Ecological succession; Geography; Physical geography; Biology; Species richness","score_opus":0.07522471650205732,"score_gpt":0.21648106580210066,"score_spread":0.14125634930004333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146147595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992493,0.000022755863,0.0003860812,0.0000073459382,8.3882804e-7,0.0000040970144,0.00013543817,0.000006365721,0.00018778155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985863,0.000021259584,0.0011028796,0.0000030031395,0.0000023583066,0.000005065926,0.0001832468,0.0000012693363,0.000094694384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998627,0.000021216794,0.000010227144,0.000041912375,0.000034741242,0.00002923573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993168,0.00023717534,0.00016494434,0.00004599897,0.00015975036,0.00007528346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003319577,0.00015348262,0.00015779065,0.0012438134,0.0002457443,0.0003474889,0.00024052543,0.0002013268,0.00037931566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075632683,0.0001672783,0.00016253481,0.001153643,0.00028759454,0.00040772487,0.00024218988,0.00012083892,0.000082244005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053411693,0.00020847873,0.92716277,0.00006641335,0.000098937286,0.00014966492,0.0005435024,0.0074176867,0.029036846,0.00019784711,0.00031476706,0.03426903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011859292,0.000035022902,0.9843658,0.0000032822857,0.00001930251,0.000084998144,0.00018013698,0.014351053,0.0008012134,0.000059066413,0.000081571605,0.000006749911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026638985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033846024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026638985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038483154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029016056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052967846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151376144","doi":"10.1007/s10531-008-9340-5","title":"Evidence for decline in eastern North American bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae), with special focus on Bombus affinis Cresson","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":359,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bumblebee; Fauna; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Pollinator; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Biodiversity; Biology; Species richness; Apidae; Temperate climate; Hymenoptera; Pollination; Pollen","score_opus":0.12278964022888506,"score_gpt":0.22769847674097807,"score_spread":0.10490883651209301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151376144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99235827,0.0017834088,0.00009975436,0.00069595716,0.000018944218,0.0000061581986,0.000423763,0.0000075260878,0.0046063196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968225,0.001103407,0.00013512971,0.00026342485,0.00002472976,0.00001203592,0.0005674168,0.000002897875,0.0010685483],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997528,0.000042630447,0.00002441416,0.000056365858,0.00007137704,0.000052313175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963245,0.0006868307,0.0014857971,0.00015757594,0.000994802,0.00035044053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060834025,0.0001949932,0.00020601133,0.0014683869,0.0010793611,0.0007762852,0.00038135608,0.00045679093,0.0033021304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024631207,0.00017371532,0.000093225826,0.0013272347,0.0012565318,0.0006618394,0.00051708886,0.000599118,0.00023791095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028959336,0.00006140577,0.97064203,0.00019348286,0.0000553284,0.00016031819,0.002624964,0.00004377542,0.0040408457,0.00031806974,0.0017395449,0.019830594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015566845,0.000018111901,0.99803954,0.000016125781,0.000008675677,0.00006479858,0.0006567518,0.000015818528,0.000064743974,0.00003154166,0.0010809145,0.0000014373835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049053926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12798278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049053926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065642816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036384788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0975368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155756502","doi":"10.1023/a:1016807606593","title":"Researching little-known species: the African bat Otomops martiensseni (Chiroptera: Molossidae)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Cave; Ecology; Harem; Biodiversity; Human echolocation; Zoology; Biology","score_opus":0.05861489719891883,"score_gpt":0.19551500706595284,"score_spread":0.13690010986703402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155756502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98719054,0.008525958,0.0005809348,0.00045376556,0.00004732509,0.000024036997,0.00015065493,0.000008350045,0.0030183878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98658097,0.0069477414,0.0027837462,0.00032854613,0.00011393713,0.000053538173,0.00035617937,0.000005945963,0.0028293494],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972934,0.000063792926,0.000019692405,0.00009890926,0.000038796938,0.0000493768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990602,0.0003229813,0.00025789707,0.00006985213,0.00015309754,0.00013609171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058917963,0.00037474564,0.0005094728,0.00075689174,0.0018934447,0.0009654582,0.0005730347,0.0008069548,0.006041921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013237044,0.00022417001,0.00014217025,0.0008811854,0.0007372034,0.0025522886,0.00059249304,0.000277837,0.0006123894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009889974,0.0006572637,0.60107565,0.0035159823,0.00014021054,0.0016036731,0.013041961,0.000489705,0.11879472,0.002086237,0.001527667,0.25607786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007450101,0.002133637,0.8890334,0.0012767956,0.00040083408,0.008711703,0.035406258,0.0011604876,0.019482471,0.004137594,0.038113043,0.000069258575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030005234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015912535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006041921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031068572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006130338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020212233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159382108","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0088-y","title":"A mobility index for Canadian butterfly species based on naturalists’ knowledge","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Butterfly; Respondent; Amateur; Ecology; Geography; Taxon; Range (aeronautics); Biodiversity; Biology; Political science","score_opus":0.03589852238350872,"score_gpt":0.20380725846180164,"score_spread":0.16790873607829293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159382108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97350955,0.00061943464,0.0028565223,0.00016867544,0.000033498807,0.00011031222,0.012029654,0.00016005883,0.010512322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98846114,0.0001956731,0.004338697,0.000015428133,0.000012992993,0.0000621369,0.0057189674,0.00001695595,0.0011779808],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949205,0.00003861426,0.000043881097,0.00007085607,0.0002333462,0.00012132863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997672,0.00030871332,0.00046631973,0.00008794067,0.0011554029,0.000309576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007332067,0.00040829022,0.0003138569,0.00970644,0.0013548551,0.0008548529,0.0007872345,0.0003159847,0.0027635163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041121882,0.00013445591,0.00063832663,0.0055963085,0.0003928274,0.00085875863,0.0007385024,0.00030875075,0.00033198588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001768872,0.00003418285,0.95905036,0.000085457075,0.00019640128,0.00005566481,0.00051693106,0.0017665087,0.0011643203,0.0006876227,0.0051610474,0.031104641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009706893,0.000021640519,0.98991454,0.000026662703,0.00007117917,0.00009451217,0.00069759024,0.005554469,0.00031108886,0.00023120234,0.0030398872,0.000027606045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83727324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92539954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16272676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006366209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045512374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32737017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160466744","doi":"10.1007/s10531-012-0425-9","title":"Matrix type alters structure of aquatic vertebrate assemblages in cypress domes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Park Service; McGill University","keywords":"Metacommunity; Cypress; Ecology; Nestedness; Biodiversity; Community structure; Beta diversity; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.020652141018411625,"score_gpt":0.23077659385440175,"score_spread":0.21012445283599013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160466744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992618,0.00013831019,0.00010364094,0.000014958885,0.000003569617,0.0000032520059,0.00009749117,0.0000049822474,0.00037205545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99919933,0.00007723584,0.00015900537,0.00001876294,0.000004251136,0.0000045443962,0.000088288485,0.0000054156903,0.0004430804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997218,0.00006344396,0.000019500496,0.00009195053,0.00005091316,0.00005230621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991437,0.00012849999,0.000309169,0.000093247465,0.00012317601,0.00020218066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021050539,0.00021602232,0.00034399537,0.0011045818,0.00078134227,0.0011894646,0.00025592613,0.00035551013,0.0029232956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089087925,0.00036053985,0.00029881843,0.0004797045,0.0008590041,0.00038010895,0.0008610381,0.0002610559,0.00037349426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085608516,0.00010915986,0.7538726,0.00012231657,0.0004510144,0.00024369254,0.0010896011,0.0002778789,0.23498875,0.00023795434,0.00041325766,0.0073377877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017499673,0.000035920173,0.9988576,0.0000032339963,0.00001880221,0.00004423037,0.00028291042,0.000085389234,0.0005432408,0.000024108947,0.000100602265,0.0000022070076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011480182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05490145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011480182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031590427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022826731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163754028","doi":"10.1007/s10531-010-9904-z","title":"Evaluating the protection of wildlife in parks: the case of African buffalo in Serengeti","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"International Livestock Research Institute; Zoologische Gesellschaft Frankfurt","keywords":"Poaching; Wildlife; Geography; Population; Biodiversity; Tanzania; Protected area; Bushmeat; Population growth; National park; Predation; Wildlife management; Wildlife conservation; Ecology; Socioeconomics; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.03886625324424315,"score_gpt":0.2472755378396228,"score_spread":0.20840928459537966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163754028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99946326,0.000048950507,0.0002485547,0.000045974484,0.0000013740861,0.000009714563,0.000038232174,0.000002105519,0.0001417611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991111,0.000075487726,0.00064766716,0.000008768148,0.0000026048292,0.000008920184,0.000049533166,0.0000015141298,0.0000943638],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993808,0.0003806388,0.000019605503,0.000063676984,0.000036018315,0.00011920866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722064,0.0018308321,0.00039039893,0.0000904181,0.0001864948,0.00028126137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020573207,0.00053549075,0.00039346362,0.00083727785,0.00067448965,0.0011151539,0.00081989303,0.00081078935,0.0008571146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005612335,0.00031143456,0.0007314779,0.00085285306,0.0010756089,0.0011693297,0.0009242706,0.00048437138,0.000053214957],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036068205,0.00036705282,0.7860184,0.00012465712,0.00029625624,0.0021458613,0.00086318154,0.19877313,0.0015936418,0.0011619205,0.00021214115,0.008083111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055733,0.0010000456,0.54870206,0.000057224468,0.00020404509,0.00049678405,0.0046248944,0.44219375,0.00084046327,0.0011957941,0.000584582,0.000044594773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070383646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11886177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070383646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025965874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014383935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13994789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166826449","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-6679-0","title":"Traditional Maize Storage Methods of Mayan Farmers in Yucatan, Mexico: Implications for Seed Selection and Crop Diversity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agnico Eagle (Canada)","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Crop; Agricultural biodiversity; Agroforestry; Biology; Agriculture; Agronomy; Selection (genetic algorithm); Husk; Genetic resources; Sowing; Biotechnology; Botany; Ecology","score_opus":0.062493729897177636,"score_gpt":0.24747258529293187,"score_spread":0.18497885539575423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166826449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997255,0.000027594733,0.000027747155,0.000024575445,4.5933032e-7,0.0000023006742,0.000021303575,4.798038e-7,0.0001699909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999432,0.000053841413,0.00016525008,0.00001413035,0.0000011213864,0.0000049605787,0.00003596452,0.0000010012873,0.00029163575],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974626,0.00008002455,0.000013632191,0.000060815804,0.00003516977,0.000064103515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910057,0.00021173639,0.00038496917,0.00004024618,0.00015275515,0.000109721754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058443734,0.00013586314,0.00013526001,0.00062656164,0.001022698,0.0004923651,0.00041124117,0.00021997876,0.0014005931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015789316,0.000099484205,0.0001042693,0.00078682345,0.0007252843,0.00038103684,0.00038199316,0.00014071098,0.00007361787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005821362,0.00017640497,0.9698229,0.000040612395,0.000054719054,0.00023746012,0.0074141324,0.0001511369,0.005256507,0.000444547,0.00024572352,0.015573922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067803253,0.00006587947,0.9925057,0.000011228722,0.000013759844,0.00007655823,0.006421801,0.00017188466,0.00029449596,0.00008371351,0.0003440939,0.000004016452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07828317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32540533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07828317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014681862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012072007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15565503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175673609","doi":"10.1023/a:1014023326658","title":"Plant diversity in three types of hedgerows adjacent to cropfields","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Quadrat; Species richness; Biodiversity; Herbaceous plant; Deciduous; Geography; Agroforestry; Woody plant; Ecotone; Species diversity; Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Biology; Shrub","score_opus":0.03738963610786516,"score_gpt":0.19433207726283697,"score_spread":0.1569424411549718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175673609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99982435,0.000011915078,0.000014337746,0.0000015144927,2.5124154e-7,0.0000012934107,0.000028288447,4.0580537e-7,0.00011769769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975854,0.000008908038,0.000050190814,0.0000031583165,5.5558337e-7,0.0000021245958,0.00005924197,3.1531056e-7,0.00011690466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996728,0.00007729263,0.00001852493,0.00008263379,0.000047347272,0.00010154675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990269,0.00028474498,0.00021944942,0.00005281719,0.000116540024,0.0002994696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034417282,0.00015446983,0.000215531,0.0012441629,0.00089593994,0.0005517745,0.0003516536,0.00029365128,0.0010070407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008636502,0.0001647321,0.00018137728,0.0008848344,0.00104254,0.00028429207,0.0005882588,0.00018742374,0.00010587689],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085842254,0.00009269313,0.98728395,0.000028368928,0.00006151273,0.0001324539,0.0017567695,0.00021335135,0.0063668676,0.00022351119,0.00007050337,0.0029116068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005076978,0.000044293236,0.9989341,0.0000015443649,0.000006787569,0.000045043813,0.00066098454,0.0000946562,0.00012740739,0.00002532944,0.000052706524,0.0000018971444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031490617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1602288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031490617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009323673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031560025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06261468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227942155","doi":"10.1007/s10531-015-1039-9","title":"How useful are volunteers for visual biodiversity surveys? An evaluation of skill level and group size during a conservation expedition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Biodiversity conservation; Sampling (signal processing); Computer science; Applied psychology; Psychology; Ecology; Computer vision; Biology","score_opus":0.09562692038336024,"score_gpt":0.25398335657880655,"score_spread":0.15835643619544632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227942155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972422,0.00004447035,0.0013128573,0.00011411736,0.000015095093,0.00006674969,0.000018941037,0.000014547548,0.0011709741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974656,0.000041648247,0.001998384,0.000035567286,0.000010542082,0.00006719241,0.000040787,0.0000043003492,0.00033596178],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927279,0.005132273,0.00031753743,0.00044996827,0.0008306777,0.0005417507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697731,0.018926805,0.0030701319,0.0019140559,0.0029610838,0.0033547778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010405874,0.00027109333,0.00025582514,0.00053952285,0.00049866515,0.0007025787,0.00046308953,0.0005855502,0.0011004206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036791783,0.00014742276,0.00026015914,0.00019312181,0.0005931002,0.000845506,0.0007554189,0.0002845106,0.00042130772],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002116546,0.0018647608,0.8362406,0.00020619681,0.000077581746,0.00046674005,0.0060650962,0.0019352221,0.009899445,0.000120715726,0.00080849364,0.14019857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078614576,0.012012486,0.9657319,0.00011019246,0.00007374114,0.0006425278,0.009907014,0.004717754,0.0031366493,0.00032792555,0.0032120957,0.000049161325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011833992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032434082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010405874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002469478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055032134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283365686","doi":"10.1007/s10531-015-1027-0","title":"Conservation priority of endemic Chinese flora at family and genus levels","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Endemism; Flora (microbiology); Biodiversity; Geography; Genus; Ecology; Subtropics; Evergreen; China; Biodiversity hotspot; Global biodiversity; Phylogenetic diversity; Species diversity; Biogeography; Conservation status; Distribution (mathematics); Biology; Agroforestry; Phylogenetic tree; Habitat","score_opus":0.11594439843386205,"score_gpt":0.21425196607489205,"score_spread":0.09830756764103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283365686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869676,0.0023364024,0.0005186487,0.000983212,0.00003824642,0.000026862208,0.00010967983,0.000026279587,0.008993183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972339,0.000771943,0.00066078815,0.000119549295,0.000028851497,0.000010335345,0.00006874364,0.0000040924497,0.0011017232],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996942,0.00005355551,0.000020113177,0.00004890722,0.00005213082,0.00013106826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937797,0.00005733604,0.0001077431,0.00003599431,0.00016857112,0.000252404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005231368,0.00025026288,0.00032052217,0.0025644444,0.0019032048,0.0009337594,0.00040713974,0.00025636086,0.0035708533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007511918,0.00014605088,0.00016663785,0.0023581064,0.00069100724,0.000885372,0.0007575986,0.00030888797,0.00009780835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031893147,0.00008237424,0.753601,0.0009035275,0.00021388187,0.0014147552,0.011530325,0.00113489,0.017760439,0.0131870145,0.0031201397,0.19673279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000078981175,0.00007290635,0.9781756,0.00010515087,0.00008774698,0.0005197461,0.006993965,0.0007084024,0.0005687732,0.0031292837,0.0096144155,0.000016026996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023380188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062713474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023380188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015859137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032513351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046488225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2307822933","doi":"10.1007/s10531-016-1080-3","title":"The effect of human population size on the breeding bird diversity of urban regions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Population size; Species richness; Ecology; Urbanization; Population; Urban ecology; Biodiversity; Urban area; Breeding bird survey; Urban ecosystem; Abundance (ecology); Impervious surface; Habitat; Habitat fragmentation; Population density; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.028628422213495746,"score_gpt":0.21644612521991258,"score_spread":0.18781770300641684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2307822933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989698,0.00009655162,0.00007340155,0.000049963222,0.0000029502476,9.3193887e-7,0.00008977048,0.0000018176016,0.00071490265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99980885,0.000026050693,0.00001826338,0.00000584176,0.0000031198688,7.5745163e-7,0.00003398448,0.0000010731065,0.000102147555],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995425,0.00023186459,0.000020249998,0.000067857305,0.000039723873,0.00009792125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996947,0.001508264,0.0005809671,0.00026708446,0.00024283252,0.0004539782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005004759,0.0001095207,0.00015728142,0.0005801658,0.00031550127,0.0004908632,0.0002890911,0.00026066342,0.003121391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002728839,0.00015069394,0.00043289983,0.0006572846,0.000879657,0.00043943033,0.00051548285,0.00027089208,0.00021258208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025311345,0.000028216482,0.9939121,0.000010107366,0.00012392162,0.00008433001,0.00021013159,0.0005840152,0.0007060367,0.00018108431,0.00011146816,0.0037954098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010943332,0.000023802088,0.9994236,0.0000014488521,0.000010894386,0.000033929777,0.00017670465,0.00016988187,0.000047685895,0.000043113905,0.000066125045,0.0000017386855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012201854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029234933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012201854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034436892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023563406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024261653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2410608952","doi":"10.1007/s10531-016-1139-1","title":"Diversity patterns of seasonal wetland plant communities mainly driven by rare terrestrial species","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Nestedness; Wetland; Species richness; Ecology; Biodiversity; Species diversity; Rare species; Plant community; Geography; Global biodiversity; Common species; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.021618297756761464,"score_gpt":0.18348583010131,"score_spread":0.16186753234454854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2410608952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994754,0.000034479857,0.00008897676,0.0000059774547,9.16314e-7,0.0000013250494,0.00010141356,0.0000019822057,0.00028954912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996872,0.0000113407405,0.000055334727,0.0000036755023,0.0000013994086,0.000001800439,0.00010643866,0.0000012077746,0.00013171691],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985003,0.000030395213,0.0000074498325,0.00005669915,0.0000129706405,0.000042382075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949706,0.000111098474,0.00013859419,0.000034895897,0.00007271876,0.00014571343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015992137,0.00009658566,0.00016613967,0.00083456916,0.00032555594,0.00039049663,0.00016070955,0.0001525932,0.0019415803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051122037,0.000107285705,0.00025134586,0.00057579536,0.0003043033,0.0002676813,0.00036350673,0.0001664084,0.00017886024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022569417,0.00003555769,0.97508824,0.000026023346,0.000111882066,0.0000709814,0.000853959,0.00014498069,0.017381474,0.00016450664,0.00017259922,0.0057239817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.981136e-7,0.000010893058,0.99927133,0.0000013285252,0.000007773056,0.000038241134,0.0002357104,0.00022894779,0.00009808542,0.000044436874,0.000060535607,0.0000018704608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037487044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011843976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037487044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019623428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017949888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0074537992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460214957","doi":"10.1007/s10531-016-1167-x","title":"Community ecological modelling as an alternative to physiographic classifications for marine conservation planning","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"Ecology; Multidimensional scaling; Biodiversity; Habitat; Environmental science; Indicator species; Abiotic component; Community structure; Marine protected area; Community; Geography; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.14201008513041152,"score_gpt":0.27839403727666007,"score_spread":0.13638395214624854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460214957","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07398395,0.00032924625,0.91190284,0.00094284135,0.0001655528,0.00012980764,0.001121498,0.000777341,0.010646841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6147017,0.00031384075,0.3793135,0.00012921041,0.000075482785,0.00044425126,0.0007666507,0.00022856212,0.0040267142],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990233,0.00068794354,0.00004273643,0.000089840214,0.00010846226,0.000047677797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933809,0.0052119964,0.00035109915,0.00036202185,0.00042066257,0.00027337475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021941627,0.0006130207,0.0009099152,0.0017962714,0.0009004947,0.0015103517,0.00154438,0.001182344,0.00943801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010596133,0.000598044,0.0012707526,0.0026698972,0.00058258587,0.0022768648,0.0013982587,0.0013835812,0.0006484808],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004866343,0.000094025665,0.0050719776,0.00006871858,0.0001059644,0.0000505104,0.00015188474,0.9252285,0.00026069116,0.036070928,0.0011320183,0.031716246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011194451,0.000010958935,0.00045980926,0.00001524888,0.000010751378,0.00001819442,0.000061925864,0.9755474,0.00004418633,0.022808403,0.0010022275,0.000009794302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029350655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052299604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029350655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013502808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016885037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058359683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476170797","doi":"10.1007/s10531-016-1181-z","title":"Phylogenetic diversity and its conservation in the presence of phylogenetic uncertainty: a case study of cladoceran communities in urban waterbodies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; GDG Environnement; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Groupe de recherche interuniversitaire en limnologie","keywords":"Phylogenetic diversity; Phylogenetic tree; Biodiversity; Biology; Phylogenetics; Ecology; Conservation biology; Evolutionary biology; Geography; Genetics","score_opus":0.04105524998425811,"score_gpt":0.233125961704595,"score_spread":0.19207071172033688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476170797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99966896,0.000022512408,0.000103809914,0.000016002985,1.7921244e-7,0.0000018038813,0.000009071804,3.9443302e-7,0.00017719562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99987364,0.000012844624,0.00007893636,0.0000014387347,3.1487926e-7,7.6185995e-7,0.0000062464264,2.8064707e-7,0.000025391788],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990709,0.00044658565,0.000031465555,0.000119007695,0.00011385473,0.00021821189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760604,0.001340787,0.0005019759,0.00014211639,0.0001928456,0.00021612064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014492942,0.00018593496,0.0002557649,0.0014360395,0.0020820512,0.0012563135,0.00070819753,0.0006671132,0.000934569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00406284,0.00015590206,0.00024191478,0.0019102831,0.0025215656,0.0012170121,0.0016313818,0.00039447256,0.00004087298],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014142657,0.00013261694,0.95566165,0.00004274439,0.00008411,0.0021644973,0.020666102,0.0023225786,0.0014703324,0.0015933807,0.00010231887,0.015618275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052045607,0.00014182646,0.9304997,0.000040110343,0.00005829073,0.0011194531,0.055076513,0.010538271,0.0003453083,0.0014159923,0.0007361429,0.000023259183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04113815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1099577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04113815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018913759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091104733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08179736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515777586","doi":"10.1007/s10531-016-1188-5","title":"The importance of data mining for conservation science: a case study on the wolverine","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université de Moncton; Parks Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Anthropocene; Public domain; Range (aeronautics); Biodiversity; Geography; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Data science; Computer science; Archaeology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.1550479286314824,"score_gpt":0.2939975558427196,"score_spread":0.1389496272112372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515777586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96957994,0.00080256554,0.012963435,0.005618496,0.000026212516,0.0001542871,0.00056446996,0.000076022814,0.010214487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660158,0.0008068534,0.029172657,0.00032868705,0.00001708231,0.000053030806,0.0004378005,0.00006525626,0.003102844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981741,0.001073375,0.000112984904,0.00017412561,0.0003228164,0.00014260839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845399,0.011762392,0.0008178644,0.0010257692,0.0013234344,0.00053073757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041699195,0.00029881104,0.00035979255,0.0012765209,0.0030200062,0.0028999338,0.0010971987,0.001249698,0.0016523013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010433333,0.00016742351,0.00029141895,0.0037266447,0.0016484507,0.0021369562,0.0013040458,0.00080266816,0.00013477978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004883138,0.0010059933,0.47104755,0.0009511596,0.00030449344,0.024997564,0.05016282,0.024269234,0.006917435,0.018700479,0.012881582,0.3882734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013931548,0.0011495387,0.32164326,0.0013720341,0.00037853557,0.019682424,0.22591835,0.10842575,0.018429788,0.034392096,0.26828793,0.00018102184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045785386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11588085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045785386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014636584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022728886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09103781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535167741","doi":"10.1007/s10531-016-1219-2","title":"Potential conflict between future development of natural resources and high-value wildlife habitats in boreal landscapes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Habitat; Wildlife; Geography; Ecology; Biodiversity; Grizzly Bears; Threatened species; Resource (disambiguation); Taiga; Cumulative effects; Boreal; Environmental science; Biology; Population; Ursus","score_opus":0.009029880599822583,"score_gpt":0.18691318050665892,"score_spread":0.17788329990683635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535167741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99784386,0.000066765315,0.00014858131,0.000032370903,0.0000010775864,0.000013643374,0.00010972492,0.000002756388,0.0017811846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991013,0.00005053482,0.0005260456,0.000014134958,8.1078514e-7,0.000012990291,0.0001010799,0.0000012729594,0.00019193033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994381,0.00019106585,0.000033910314,0.00007804264,0.00009713416,0.00016174157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989913,0.0002471362,0.00029317604,0.00004335012,0.00015823446,0.00026673064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007426458,0.0002115912,0.00019669249,0.001187798,0.0017678442,0.0013998243,0.0004441614,0.00023455298,0.00082304684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001723462,0.00020295715,0.00017698968,0.0018583083,0.00072985794,0.00046008854,0.00086738734,0.00020536217,0.00004287812],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007373033,0.000039335668,0.9853817,0.000028691064,0.000055292345,0.00058923766,0.0021556555,0.001349048,0.00089226384,0.00023088032,0.00026899873,0.008935221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004234277,0.000037385667,0.9881379,0.000012744081,0.000020770132,0.00024846566,0.009159573,0.0011806085,0.000089447116,0.000120798475,0.0009752374,0.000012891746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58463925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92404866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58463925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034858584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018563935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8356138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2545970941","doi":"10.1007/s10531-016-1245-0","title":"The road to 2020 targets and the learnings from the emblematic South American plant genus Nassauvia (Asteraceae)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Asteraceae; Biodiversity; Genus; Geography; Botany; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.008253577228626258,"score_gpt":0.19455741995114686,"score_spread":0.1863038427225206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2545970941","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14496496,0.05378184,0.007565111,0.6316694,0.008299115,0.000045665398,0.0028246578,0.00034252004,0.15050669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84750235,0.028361747,0.010417096,0.07799995,0.0014447748,0.000103464285,0.0022313327,0.0001538824,0.031785395],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920064,0.00017126655,0.000019773333,0.00007396859,0.00032013436,0.00021416752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778,0.000335414,0.00015482963,0.00008881549,0.0007117919,0.0009291727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031513658,0.00048320863,0.00026543243,0.0005778585,0.0014486995,0.0028410424,0.0007648235,0.00281532,0.016459644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027909877,0.00011681593,0.00029911057,0.0007053978,0.0014757385,0.005340393,0.0024671592,0.0037207752,0.0023891588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007081651,0.00043126172,0.018732237,0.0011132186,0.000075118725,0.000875259,0.00301353,0.0012434329,0.016800387,0.19045584,0.33902133,0.42753023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019508743,0.00028049207,0.03603258,0.00054975273,0.00003872254,0.00036631362,0.010156943,0.0009931399,0.0038982918,0.12387537,0.8237234,0.00006550917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008029082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014586505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016459644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022568076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062856833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05506301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2551949049","doi":"10.1007/s10531-016-1248-x","title":"Generating spatial data for marine conservation and management","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Aquatic life and conservation","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Research Council of Thailand; Ocean Park Conservation Foundation, Hong Kong; Riverbanks Zoo and Garden; SciFund Challenge; Explorers Club","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Biodiversity; Genus; Global biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Marine species; Diversity (politics); Fishery; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Biology; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.07247590797429293,"score_gpt":0.2156256398668885,"score_spread":0.14314973189259558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2551949049","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099592865,0.0009138513,0.6170875,0.004429535,0.00058821123,0.0009044174,0.23661402,0.024049949,0.015819646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29720846,0.0008738399,0.562303,0.00018394945,0.00008354591,0.00068408635,0.13551502,0.00096355047,0.0021845715],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926597,0.00025010688,0.00006544825,0.00012076181,0.00024422933,0.000053532363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99612916,0.0016240638,0.00026086744,0.0010328732,0.0008341854,0.00011878228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015832153,0.0007619874,0.0004944413,0.005129851,0.00059509417,0.0013850003,0.0012527687,0.000850832,0.009123659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013302341,0.0006005052,0.0010552388,0.0063197007,0.00035984415,0.0019349423,0.0020615777,0.0009466783,0.0027034637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003481621,0.00047226477,0.06535393,0.0010511826,0.00045006353,0.00064723793,0.0007101332,0.29926127,0.00814609,0.037403457,0.15688671,0.42926946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012484052,0.00010390309,0.015818682,0.00031254673,0.00020748843,0.00020635396,0.0016944478,0.7616822,0.01189283,0.07132596,0.13653229,0.000098415214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019193212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02957398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019193212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011168523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023563616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038162947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2579454099","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1292-1","title":"Demographic responses of boreal caribou to cumulative disturbances highlight elasticity of range-specific tolerance thresholds","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs","keywords":"Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Boreal; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Environmental science; Engineering","score_opus":0.024947799134505514,"score_gpt":0.2278178891072758,"score_spread":0.20287008997277028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2579454099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99940896,0.00001890595,0.0001545867,0.00001493718,9.4255284e-7,7.4432046e-7,0.000022606408,0.0000025336103,0.00037579762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998592,0.000006402574,0.00003876329,0.0000060136285,0.0000010404694,0.0000010342388,0.000022661026,0.0000011092039,0.000063734995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998274,0.00004274966,0.000011646207,0.000060972547,0.00001956218,0.00003759958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864036,0.0004884144,0.00041507636,0.00017068507,0.00012199732,0.00016341524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048311584,0.000099213925,0.00019027303,0.000511179,0.0002551346,0.0006580819,0.0002571903,0.00039499864,0.0022708932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031541877,0.00017202317,0.00015058176,0.00024961255,0.00046214147,0.000528821,0.00054642226,0.00035954686,0.000120895056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025313973,0.00007990861,0.97163,0.000017820043,0.00008634531,0.00009129689,0.0008575016,0.002729681,0.017019637,0.000699436,0.00016871783,0.0063664787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014448755,0.00003380366,0.9975012,0.0000015741892,0.000007888831,0.00006715471,0.0004358023,0.0013780488,0.00018593254,0.00029233197,0.000091019465,0.0000038761646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046812403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010517676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046812403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024261074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010992644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009307981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581473419","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1305-0","title":"Nestedness of butterfly assemblages in the Zhoushan Archipelago, China: area effects, life-history traits and conservation implications","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Nestedness; Butterfly; Ecology; Archipelago; Biology; Biodiversity; Geography","score_opus":0.07622572896852393,"score_gpt":0.20829234290245677,"score_spread":0.13206661393393282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581473419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998723,0.000035276666,0.000022560342,0.000006063336,4.729493e-7,4.3083185e-7,0.000020459665,7.488574e-7,0.000041566273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999887,0.000012735334,0.000020506828,0.000003061454,7.8616847e-7,8.24189e-7,0.000036387115,5.5542057e-7,0.00003811682],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996816,0.00007064628,0.000025755335,0.0001271689,0.000035614154,0.000059251135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994242,0.00012719617,0.00015868832,0.000058782585,0.00007537755,0.00015566694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003935349,0.00021698468,0.00027107913,0.0013589148,0.0005745058,0.00034387386,0.0004123016,0.00022998576,0.0007568175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006999059,0.00026865592,0.00033348092,0.00083613937,0.0009151955,0.00039066252,0.00054861966,0.00019238373,0.00006299748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052925425,0.000012425183,0.994772,0.000012587207,0.0001250666,0.00007450951,0.00084169826,0.00013840178,0.0023925977,0.00008247168,0.00003602148,0.0014592228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014203687,0.0000060653647,0.9993611,0.0000014163621,0.0000102183085,0.00002130808,0.000275047,0.0002451183,0.000031324522,0.00002445368,0.000020641119,0.000001903021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050669547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14405486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050669547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008880427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054588146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100749254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604787968","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1348-2","title":"Trading populations—can biodiversity offsets effectively compensate for population losses?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"University of New England","keywords":"Biodiversity; Threatened species; Population; Biology; Biodiversity hotspot; Habitat; Ecology; Offset (computer science); Habitat destruction; Genetic diversity; Population size; Agroforestry; Demography","score_opus":0.052601305770379726,"score_gpt":0.24341281152613067,"score_spread":0.19081150575575095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604787968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4152377,0.011692646,0.06447181,0.11512127,0.005446668,0.00016934998,0.00043778206,0.0005899131,0.38683286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98641115,0.00096818805,0.002623626,0.0019386137,0.0003615166,0.000022397338,0.000033263455,0.000033128465,0.007608166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854124,0.00043664878,0.0000671889,0.00024522198,0.00038243507,0.00032732906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99609727,0.0014929043,0.0007897135,0.0005090272,0.00053140096,0.00057967746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032362875,0.00056594604,0.0007086604,0.0006843295,0.0009170823,0.004521,0.0014425995,0.003258944,0.020458672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013917769,0.00028518683,0.00035930256,0.000611199,0.0038305325,0.009251399,0.0030655293,0.0021116452,0.0014487561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071023643,0.0004073441,0.022173746,0.00035549182,0.00027415372,0.00045780846,0.0005303433,0.012796253,0.0035670418,0.49319234,0.025953665,0.43958157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015775734,0.00037196945,0.017089492,0.00030731663,0.00017613206,0.0005805398,0.0030222784,0.018293299,0.0018794184,0.87950605,0.078546904,0.000068912304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012906276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021210043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020458672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011902411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018824412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06844109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611298390","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1364-2","title":"A call for more physiology at conservation conferences","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Physiological and biochemical adaptations","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Society for Conservation Biology","keywords":"Conservation biology; Conservation psychology; Discipline; Ecology; Biology; Engineering ethics; Biodiversity; Sociology; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.05833129403549077,"score_gpt":0.23724977672104508,"score_spread":0.17891848268555433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611298390","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012292224,0.011748047,0.0014222356,0.7788117,0.19072507,0.000042596468,0.0001551344,0.00021840913,0.015647689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018068327,0.013297001,0.0060383407,0.57199705,0.2593775,0.0001718871,0.00065235887,0.0005266717,0.12987085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99270284,0.0021476562,0.00039407023,0.0008071135,0.002387092,0.0015611827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9480442,0.0052024033,0.001838329,0.0022564828,0.0137421405,0.02891644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022899194,0.002185254,0.0021971776,0.0031121918,0.004655468,0.012344102,0.0034846496,0.024056984,0.15118009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019351102,0.0011023266,0.0025278183,0.0021211253,0.004261212,0.0193142,0.009085502,0.031390104,0.037580565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018655688,0.00020279257,0.0005562882,0.00042469468,0.00004443056,0.00026204946,0.00016494155,0.00011095185,0.0029178108,0.007160694,0.9517298,0.03623902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061160055,0.00012299264,0.0024838718,0.00027486024,0.00002644156,0.00035869156,0.0009177846,0.00007846682,0.0003981089,0.016140828,0.9790805,0.000056456283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084883795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024946444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15118009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036403444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053461813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5057478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2691492924","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1388-7","title":"Building capacity in biodiversity monitoring at the global scale","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Aboriginal Affairs Northern Dev Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Citizen science; Measurement of biodiversity; Global biodiversity; Scale (ratio); Environmental planning; Environmental monitoring; Government (linguistics); Business; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Biodiversity conservation; Biology; Cartography","score_opus":0.04633108522029691,"score_gpt":0.2224894523681347,"score_spread":0.17615836714783778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2691492924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32279018,0.008177264,0.13279581,0.238498,0.0011879202,0.0011607723,0.0019182184,0.0009065097,0.29256532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96337146,0.0021299107,0.024292944,0.004259019,0.00023632901,0.0006110184,0.00032173068,0.00007750834,0.0047001117],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871558,0.008499383,0.000287953,0.0010092361,0.0012520651,0.0017955113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9366374,0.041869,0.0033179496,0.0066099404,0.0042990316,0.0072666192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026252395,0.0006130595,0.0006856367,0.0047833007,0.0027264138,0.0071980082,0.002998828,0.0029701584,0.016362239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05336054,0.0005667871,0.00044959434,0.003524212,0.0091605205,0.019165076,0.02104442,0.00322125,0.0011673605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022086364,0.0005937028,0.09752856,0.0015873893,0.00027128347,0.00043064269,0.01721148,0.01605446,0.002589057,0.2777898,0.04822243,0.5375004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000632168,0.00034050344,0.06579518,0.0033588237,0.00013859311,0.00039941832,0.044583295,0.015998617,0.0047468026,0.6328649,0.23152907,0.00018158312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011180529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014325546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026252395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038097475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015602004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13883758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748498433","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1421-x","title":"Trait-specific response of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) to forest fragmentation in the temperate region in Korea","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ground beetle; Species richness; Biodiversity; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Temperate rainforest; Habitat fragmentation; Temperate forest; Fragmentation (computing); Forest fragmentation; Temperate climate; Biology; Geography; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.05269590243495913,"score_gpt":0.22412704231223618,"score_spread":0.17143113987727704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748498433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99992406,0.000012878427,0.000007586802,0.0000029806977,3.617766e-7,6.6357e-7,0.000022408703,2.9538867e-7,0.000028727804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998872,0.000011071504,0.000013674547,0.0000052176174,4.1327198e-7,0.0000010718417,0.00004495455,3.360986e-7,0.000036115176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984455,0.000028220576,0.000012070084,0.000053136744,0.000010737096,0.000051322593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966204,0.000031716256,0.00012517397,0.000021146005,0.000042834567,0.000117183015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018134875,0.0001977689,0.00018136586,0.0004663339,0.00029908124,0.00031506663,0.00019700029,0.00017828983,0.00070975797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027798722,0.00017272877,0.00021373486,0.000402439,0.00026611914,0.00022946054,0.00033074972,0.00020535591,0.00008285035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013300787,0.000041698448,0.9938584,0.000010660249,0.00006422647,0.00008281378,0.00052091456,0.00006868247,0.003850912,0.000017699325,0.000039730316,0.0013113044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.23891e-7,0.000017476588,0.99946874,8.915274e-7,0.0000052176774,0.00003084473,0.00039292115,0.00003543226,0.000024689085,0.0000034018874,0.000018389517,0.0000010848341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014182156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05530486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014182156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032234276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021051441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028199196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749899075","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1414-9","title":"Comparison of road surveys and circuit theory to predict hotspot locations for implementing road-effect mitigation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère des Transports; Ministry of Environment; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","keywords":"Hotspot (geology); Biodiversity hotspot; Habitat; Wildlife; Biodiversity; Fragmentation (computing); Environmental resource management; Habitat fragmentation; Landscape connectivity; Fencing; Habitat destruction; Geography; Computer science; Transport engineering; Ecology; Environmental science; Engineering; Population; Biology","score_opus":0.044629251128892024,"score_gpt":0.2882046705208232,"score_spread":0.2435754193919312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749899075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9050506,0.00040128463,0.085580654,0.00043876417,0.00007517858,0.00034733422,0.0013601804,0.0004501346,0.006295877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827444,0.00009373155,0.015629325,0.000040139228,0.000014798272,0.000083962346,0.0006910922,0.00002685249,0.00067574496],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980406,0.0010058407,0.00008261564,0.0004080427,0.000260055,0.00020291869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97326905,0.022769142,0.00073997036,0.00071567064,0.0020441604,0.000461986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004890501,0.0009407022,0.000992773,0.0034188416,0.0005391599,0.0014576974,0.0019143313,0.0017985607,0.0030397912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024277905,0.00044833653,0.00075784087,0.0015505819,0.00043170972,0.0021266262,0.00093883986,0.0005893919,0.00040123408],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016029372,0.0007913143,0.29691377,0.0001812552,0.00036476366,0.000062035215,0.00015895379,0.5981873,0.0004995437,0.0033812828,0.0014986834,0.096358195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008449008,0.00029903985,0.024932813,0.000015338688,0.000091811555,0.000021894512,0.00012226764,0.97234243,0.0003380794,0.0015343166,0.00019872456,0.00001873816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043230023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04952075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043230023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025331117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026265425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08595681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754114891","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1429-2","title":"Estimation of river ecosystem biodiversity based on the Chao estimator","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Rarefaction (ecology); Species richness; Macrophyte; Biodiversity; Diversity index; Abundance (ecology); Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Ecology; Estimator; Species diversity; Geography; Statistics; Biology; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.043311920807560064,"score_gpt":0.21713161266249836,"score_spread":0.17381969185493829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754114891","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2846176,0.0019226016,0.7033632,0.00031450432,0.00007299255,0.0001287391,0.001200116,0.0005921671,0.007788056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89385885,0.00030608135,0.104087636,0.00004908542,0.00006232027,0.00009703429,0.00073511415,0.000037084883,0.0007667349],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887186,0.0006355076,0.000041921663,0.00016703896,0.00020944886,0.000074251075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937821,0.004454291,0.00048443893,0.0004274217,0.00069437025,0.00015741085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028946016,0.00037068847,0.00080461014,0.0044302833,0.00039200718,0.0010538448,0.0006193382,0.0005846638,0.0014925395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011534362,0.00026695008,0.000380207,0.0022623667,0.0004903105,0.0012942497,0.0009252443,0.0004263501,0.00024716617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005760825,0.00015652692,0.32699406,0.00031251495,0.0007413713,0.00014029082,0.00024062223,0.25904194,0.007036959,0.036568336,0.004084912,0.36410633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003695194,0.00006909018,0.062660456,0.000047312627,0.00006022585,0.00020826115,0.00010534844,0.9231237,0.001827179,0.009935659,0.001864262,0.000061566054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005691706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008531592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005691706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058793736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068861136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015308261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765587043","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1453-2","title":"Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España; Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment; Generalitat de Catalunya; Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries; Centres de Recerca de Catalunya","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Biodiversity; Forest ecology; Ecosystem; Intact forest landscape; Forest restoration; Biomass (ecology); Environmental resource management; Agroforestry; Provisioning; Ecosystem health; Ecology; Geography; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.013535963051067659,"score_gpt":0.18854538373062454,"score_spread":0.17500942067955688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765587043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67705226,0.04622812,0.013345636,0.05508595,0.00031270884,0.00005067908,0.0009792887,0.00008140137,0.20686403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916114,0.004816357,0.00096072094,0.0003829771,0.00009825554,0.000011484953,0.000060443956,0.000004215857,0.0020540764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992021,0.0003972927,0.000030393016,0.00006603137,0.000121663,0.00018257738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978029,0.0010419926,0.00050822535,0.00010983097,0.00018341657,0.00035354303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017505459,0.00024096636,0.00033268798,0.0012309912,0.000910809,0.0039059808,0.00036400455,0.0015470992,0.005092933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033898104,0.00017092182,0.00021319978,0.0021304858,0.0050588963,0.0032443132,0.0011431893,0.0008738896,0.00023853578],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016182079,0.00020014163,0.0675036,0.00037806094,0.00012297698,0.00025689334,0.00083058525,0.012554884,0.0009906293,0.8404622,0.005386873,0.07115123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025378084,0.0001195566,0.15646937,0.00037275543,0.00009250105,0.0004201271,0.0028325238,0.007229492,0.00037830172,0.7939481,0.038073678,0.000038241018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014633233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0350362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014633233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023783206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025457903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029096127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774813874","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1489-3","title":"Primate population dynamics: variation in abundance over space and time","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Wildlife; Ecology; Bushmeat; Primate; National park; Abundance (ecology); Population; Logging; Endangered species; Biodiversity; Geography; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.02353328295512065,"score_gpt":0.27870085806612366,"score_spread":0.255167575111003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774813874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949233,0.00055188016,0.0019250079,0.00030005164,0.000008273391,0.0000024508024,0.00011399997,0.000016937409,0.002158088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99911636,0.00018336224,0.00029096866,0.000028929951,0.000010489832,0.0000025161626,0.000062041145,0.0000061746396,0.00029922003],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979526,0.00008954596,0.0000116713945,0.000051523824,0.000035527082,0.00001644523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884284,0.00057314907,0.0003335415,0.00006865259,0.00009577237,0.00008608336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005850167,0.00009122123,0.000213288,0.00077967247,0.0002713315,0.0008719629,0.00024679012,0.0004230572,0.0020744877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034622026,0.00017974978,0.00013614923,0.000852606,0.0007323882,0.0009973372,0.000383862,0.00036632302,0.00028243772],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000231815,0.0001568042,0.92665935,0.00006112676,0.00027234675,0.0001442483,0.0024215458,0.0033392801,0.011506243,0.0027566776,0.0010339085,0.051416732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021491724,0.000055383032,0.99264467,0.000008255435,0.000024201354,0.00034849902,0.00076885417,0.0035750729,0.00020498848,0.001565659,0.0007933764,0.000008840757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027511208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005939152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027511208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002634231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000114622984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0069398284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775281841","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1478-6","title":"Patterns of alien plant diversity in the urban landscapes of global biodiversity hotspots: a case study from the Himalayas","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Alien; Biodiversity; Ecology; Biodiversity hotspot; Geography; Biology; Introduced species; Flora (microbiology); Species richness; Invasive species; Temperate climate; Endemism; Population","score_opus":0.03017577589911767,"score_gpt":0.22428066954549672,"score_spread":0.19410489364637906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775281841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99951637,0.00003615033,0.000022625554,0.0000135856735,2.3110516e-7,0.0000027115693,0.00003425854,7.1251145e-7,0.00037336515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997538,0.000050831193,0.000051077513,0.0000027952408,6.8158676e-7,0.0000017106498,0.000031013067,3.5115102e-7,0.00010769341],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997955,0.000070833725,0.000009524727,0.000028449334,0.000031443607,0.00006424787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996123,0.00015464866,0.0001045337,0.000029697725,0.000044662036,0.00005423975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022404992,0.00021295434,0.00015520923,0.0016349576,0.0011562752,0.0008915361,0.00039864075,0.00028469268,0.001056413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005970084,0.0001591861,0.00018505697,0.0027730323,0.0012298538,0.0004998006,0.00087509747,0.00018544382,0.00007465903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018829276,0.00010623566,0.926643,0.00014003142,0.00012178492,0.0060484027,0.047244627,0.0013203564,0.0030049912,0.000979448,0.00022630823,0.013976453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034720497,0.000041805277,0.964298,0.000015753893,0.000031546377,0.0010927878,0.03308349,0.00054418936,0.00026782652,0.0001367255,0.0004739316,0.00001039358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06749177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15830979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06749177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012934012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037720488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13419783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889218138","doi":"10.1007/s10531-018-1622-y","title":"Seasonal variation in avian diversity and tolerance by migratory forest specialists of the patch-isolation gradient across a fragmented forest system","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Claude Leon Foundation; Inyuvesi Yakwazulu-Natali; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Ecology; Biological dispersal; Habitat; Biodiversity; Habitat fragmentation; Geography; Beta diversity; Biology; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.009651600581917899,"score_gpt":0.18858974235983175,"score_spread":0.17893814177791384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889218138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998975,0.000012363172,0.00001109814,0.000003836073,3.4075086e-7,3.7392408e-7,0.000016191247,3.8343376e-7,0.00005790257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998802,0.0000062167114,0.000013252064,0.0000032666549,8.912737e-7,7.313729e-7,0.00004272449,4.4530276e-7,0.000052363313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998585,0.000032026615,0.0000092906985,0.0000399205,0.000013155736,0.00004715786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940395,0.00011816894,0.00018480068,0.000039720184,0.00006273284,0.00019063361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026032043,0.000093075614,0.00021908229,0.0005912635,0.0003843177,0.00042863504,0.00026241838,0.00028144606,0.0014020369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006616999,0.0001491846,0.00019079515,0.00044466194,0.0005123873,0.00035511228,0.0004429015,0.000227659,0.00014639861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021535279,0.000040166702,0.9948612,0.000006582151,0.00005846774,0.000048076094,0.0007145799,0.00010801276,0.0026588996,0.000036289566,0.000048958103,0.0012034157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.192004e-7,0.000013490556,0.99961805,6.093275e-7,0.0000032994512,0.000023517223,0.00023619752,0.00006396321,0.000015922718,0.0000065460235,0.000016963313,7.169616e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010266926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03924007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010266926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002870913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014669583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020414352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914220295","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01702-1","title":"Marine reserves drive both taxonomic and functional change in coral reef invertebrate communities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ecology; Marine reserve; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Marine ecosystem; Coral reef; Habitat; Marine protected area; Biology; Taxon; Invertebrate; Geography","score_opus":0.046827466907065345,"score_gpt":0.18742756377792222,"score_spread":0.14060009687085687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914220295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983889,0.00014663512,0.000059356345,0.00012749337,0.0000037948932,0.0000014418742,0.00007465707,0.0000017151101,0.0011960436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957484,0.00004951052,0.00004101851,0.000039054936,0.0000034695472,0.0000012625386,0.000037752863,0.0000011924625,0.0002519025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963784,0.00013484771,0.000021324391,0.00007619964,0.00006817313,0.000061633065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965237,0.0009112785,0.0014997494,0.00026939617,0.00032001105,0.00047578712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008223785,0.00010877653,0.00014801844,0.00078040094,0.00046881917,0.00085905247,0.00039167216,0.00055028585,0.003971583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035730018,0.00018882302,0.00022259986,0.0006463536,0.0008204975,0.00091373693,0.0009490195,0.00046444876,0.00026641565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010392509,0.00006007059,0.9905054,0.000020742682,0.00009182419,0.00004131986,0.00046023077,0.00018781719,0.0018168929,0.000407265,0.00015509933,0.0061493833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.9828274e-7,0.000010352388,0.99920315,0.0000031991601,0.0000055634728,0.000013648208,0.00040670027,0.00013396748,0.000037924274,0.00007292332,0.00011064452,0.0000010398284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012136051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049166273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012136051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044657668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034127323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024130821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950577406","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01796-7","title":"Traded under the radar: poor documentation of trade in nationally-protected non-CITES species can cause fraudulent trade to go undetected","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"","keywords":"CITES; Wildlife; International trade; Business; Documentation; Law enforcement; Notice; Wildlife trade; Fishery; Geography; Ecology; Law; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.015608666627444175,"score_gpt":0.1981576283668192,"score_spread":0.18254896173937502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950577406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8617642,0.0023026653,0.012488061,0.009981425,0.00080740626,0.000110304376,0.0031978122,0.00036879236,0.10897938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98288465,0.00065488735,0.006202061,0.0019164432,0.00015050263,0.000022779886,0.0009880798,0.00004591108,0.0071347007],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944037,0.0018443607,0.0008400877,0.00058924744,0.0018812873,0.00044128136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9166344,0.022900127,0.034456752,0.011179443,0.0129175875,0.0019116426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008374152,0.00027004574,0.00023340007,0.0044297846,0.0011681624,0.0021239896,0.0008604632,0.001708326,0.008814808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04877902,0.0002486067,0.00015414922,0.0032194974,0.001236806,0.0024358751,0.0012008528,0.00092994166,0.002277377],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021790134,0.00014784663,0.81306785,0.00036585552,0.00008463344,0.0022645982,0.00400106,0.00026390972,0.002959881,0.004597023,0.021115948,0.15091345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002807299,0.00026051706,0.8027963,0.0028914309,0.00020468216,0.01869212,0.018146053,0.0074889446,0.013709929,0.008891646,0.12676837,0.000121924095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011252834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013340133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011252834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012934272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044287264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955661309","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01789-6","title":"Evaluating the efficacy of translocation: maintaining habitat key to long-term success for an imperiled population of an at-risk species","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Habitat; Disturbance (geology); Population; Herd; Ecology; Predation; Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Biology; Threatened species; Endangered species; Demography","score_opus":0.04212395955486165,"score_gpt":0.28046332176934163,"score_spread":0.23833936221448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955661309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99668735,0.00007187445,0.0013563265,0.00015600171,0.000017140226,0.00005137811,0.00005835154,0.000013866792,0.0015877439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99851614,0.000031114654,0.0010633208,0.000022329505,0.000005963778,0.000028983164,0.000056547637,0.0000030896715,0.00027255362],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974986,0.00132729,0.00019918077,0.00033608344,0.00036421788,0.00027466743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98589337,0.006710185,0.0035304392,0.0006779603,0.0014498644,0.0017381946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073772874,0.00055049855,0.00034193485,0.00053050776,0.000793964,0.0011709331,0.000942669,0.001374165,0.002667657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018560378,0.00014836324,0.00042890152,0.00036446375,0.0011611145,0.0027788603,0.00089705555,0.00066208444,0.000403611],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0051259124,0.002734435,0.89912057,0.00026806883,0.00039589038,0.00033324645,0.0008583133,0.014027337,0.011869823,0.0010784697,0.0005535914,0.063634366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014751969,0.031080326,0.91441905,0.00015046226,0.00067780743,0.0007022539,0.004654188,0.0369667,0.006737071,0.0026394904,0.001737704,0.00008748784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020340232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070720515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073772874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006487537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039015234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965764597","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01826-4","title":"Interspecific networks of cavity-nesting vertebrates reveal a critical role of broadleaf trees in endangered Araucaria mixed forests of South America","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Fondo de Fomento al Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico; Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Riverbanks Zoo and Garden; Columbus Zoo and Aquarium; Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Rufford Foundation","keywords":"Araucaria; Ecology; Species richness; Endangered species; Nest (protein structural motif); Interspecific competition; Biology; Temperate forest; Podocarpaceae; Geography; Temperate climate; Habitat","score_opus":0.029500923280617566,"score_gpt":0.18989747773331092,"score_spread":0.16039655445269335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965764597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99947125,0.00004048489,0.000109313274,0.0000083310815,3.936208e-7,0.0000017431083,0.000044161923,0.0000022973445,0.00032208656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996419,0.00001915779,0.00012544643,0.000005623899,7.982183e-7,0.0000030755646,0.00006124964,0.000001132253,0.00014162509],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984443,0.00003639594,0.0000073072456,0.0000621155,0.000014119205,0.000035660472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890924,0.00027434382,0.0004130399,0.00010301481,0.0001283737,0.00017198412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022884832,0.0000963724,0.00017868842,0.0012640251,0.0006076012,0.0005643661,0.00037011586,0.0002253753,0.0022602677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011334524,0.00016219745,0.00012042792,0.000729307,0.0005497262,0.00051344873,0.00066124037,0.00018640004,0.00019094658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058530364,0.00002771064,0.9841033,0.000020089712,0.000055001914,0.00005309947,0.0010896462,0.00012877128,0.009685432,0.0002851771,0.00006120606,0.004432115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010076327,0.000008437786,0.9986965,0.0000037476102,0.000010265059,0.00004050072,0.0005614665,0.00039644784,0.0000766998,0.000091305556,0.00011220027,0.0000014977043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012141517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07168932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012141517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038458087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024310302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024141729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966151708","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01827-3","title":"Lichen conservation in North America: a review of current practices and research in Canada and the United States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Lichen and fungal ecology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Museum of Nature","funders":"Directorate for Biological Sciences","keywords":"Lichen; Biodiversity; Geography; Current (fluid); Biodiversity conservation; Ecology; Environmental protection; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology; Oceanography; Geology","score_opus":0.22350958693356934,"score_gpt":0.33523051804897186,"score_spread":0.11172093111540252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966151708","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008045815,0.99937767,0.000022896918,0.00016123251,0.000048129376,0.0000025010622,0.000030841868,0.0000024283931,0.00027389644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004716522,0.9991837,0.000097207,0.00009365519,0.00002326904,0.0000017064622,0.00002167412,5.6035645e-7,0.00010663024],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993962,0.00005925982,0.0001042498,0.00008412605,0.0002912312,0.000064847874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975151,0.0008321627,0.00039448828,0.00003286915,0.0009726124,0.00025286403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021035622,0.0010216613,0.0020769048,0.008473801,0.0008049771,0.0026675456,0.0011902682,0.0013883369,0.003274909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024487204,0.00036991603,0.00068504596,0.015050515,0.0010469132,0.0016618139,0.0011519113,0.0011890308,0.000418977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000733168,0.000060168066,0.0009512969,0.053246584,0.00014641987,0.00010869386,0.00024108992,0.00031947935,0.00047967813,0.0017485401,0.023209991,0.91941476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001828244,0.000081054786,0.010956145,0.06001721,0.0007382689,0.00057653425,0.0007027246,0.0001408655,0.00027375438,0.0011373217,0.92529815,0.00005955645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18427041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4144895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8157296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004844412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018729858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36639565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980105262","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01872-y","title":"Spider monkeys, the misunderstood assumptions of distance sampling and the pitfalls of poor field design","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Spider; Biodiversity; Sampling (signal processing); Field (mathematics); Sampling design; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Computer science; Sociology; Mathematics; Computer vision; Demography","score_opus":0.07830569052443005,"score_gpt":0.28441199683506535,"score_spread":0.2061063063106353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980105262","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11416855,0.00942763,0.7805491,0.04825485,0.0037510484,0.0016741061,0.0010013175,0.0005920097,0.040581394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5895365,0.0025430329,0.3781951,0.019384466,0.0013129513,0.0032352642,0.00020008722,0.0002641451,0.0053284406],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8040717,0.17056648,0.006275334,0.0075177397,0.010820668,0.0007481092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.52740467,0.37903133,0.021611383,0.046003293,0.023606785,0.0023425766],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2013452,0.000703322,0.0013213351,0.0024041713,0.003053054,0.0025510034,0.0034094788,0.0019908044,0.002833373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39130503,0.001085525,0.0005902225,0.0021477013,0.010330483,0.0052941977,0.002704706,0.0034253756,0.0010401267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013852641,0.0006297583,0.22911951,0.003792948,0.001109867,0.0003687454,0.012664477,0.017150218,0.0050828177,0.14021266,0.05627083,0.532213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004924588,0.0022414268,0.22229795,0.0048097055,0.0007060554,0.0033302037,0.0077337087,0.04002,0.01494641,0.5028036,0.20011039,0.0005080804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061094766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020435344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7986548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026235064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020768256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98488355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980919312","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01866-w","title":"Evidence of a further emerging threat to lion conservation; targeted poaching for body parts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Nelson Mandela University; National Geographic Society; Panthera","keywords":"Poaching; Panthera; Threatened species; Bushmeat; Geography; Habitat destruction; Livestock; Trophy; Biodiversity; National park; Population; Ecology; Fishery; Habitat; Predation; Wildlife; Biology; Archaeology; Forestry","score_opus":0.026886655754773926,"score_gpt":0.22819853076816993,"score_spread":0.201311875013396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980919312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98747,0.00093470496,0.00041144964,0.0014749033,0.000042316104,0.000014882723,0.00040933053,0.00001628035,0.0092262095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969893,0.00045659964,0.00030070337,0.0002640024,0.00003197485,0.0000123078435,0.000182106,0.00000352394,0.0017595538],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996822,0.00007220532,0.00001934541,0.000073707284,0.00008494902,0.00006769659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968232,0.00061990053,0.0016785157,0.000089084744,0.0005080281,0.00028140197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050605484,0.00021619601,0.00011871448,0.000689532,0.00062992366,0.00086897984,0.0003339868,0.0005329146,0.009209731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017013687,0.000113907554,0.00015384056,0.00045019004,0.0008337422,0.00066280825,0.00085897715,0.000639066,0.00056670606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015571713,0.000050859915,0.9644516,0.00033269686,0.000048696616,0.00079013803,0.0032554104,0.00010595033,0.005358176,0.00045755922,0.0021374857,0.022855783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001838447,0.00013288354,0.9876396,0.00025615093,0.000013590336,0.00085897004,0.0044532637,0.00016469834,0.00043783832,0.00017363128,0.0058587454,0.000008758596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005506498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016066968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009209731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059735245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040361178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030809581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982324236","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01879-5","title":"Impacts of an indigenous settlement on the taxonomic and functional structure of dung beetle communities in the Venezuelan Amazon","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"Lindbergh Foundation; American Philosophical Society","keywords":"Amazon rainforest; Dung beetle; Biodiversity; Indigenous; Geography; Ecology; Settlement (finance); Habitat; Agroforestry; Biology","score_opus":0.021483915412736348,"score_gpt":0.18024300814432032,"score_spread":0.15875909273158398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982324236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99955887,0.000071741226,0.000006654068,0.00002759845,0.0000011251476,0.0000011309127,0.000015796608,4.4098363e-7,0.0003166706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998179,0.00005829561,0.000017114555,0.0000060055977,0.0000017133344,0.0000011755939,0.00001280907,3.0963662e-7,0.00008470684],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975485,0.000073962125,0.000008257152,0.000039351144,0.000018804854,0.00010473112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994954,0.00011414549,0.0001684058,0.000023904711,0.000055442684,0.0001427596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034717846,0.00019118871,0.00013606825,0.0006604128,0.0010115071,0.0007020165,0.00028223393,0.00020929177,0.0021855545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012390527,0.00011390929,0.00013125314,0.000641178,0.00079864083,0.00040863382,0.0009824908,0.0003690033,0.000052391526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004257009,0.00017618388,0.96850663,0.000086225155,0.000089876055,0.00054632133,0.009836269,0.00028120616,0.004499453,0.0006722011,0.00016856326,0.014711291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037040177,0.000016678012,0.99752325,0.0000069400944,0.000010192224,0.00004034549,0.0021692908,0.0000656454,0.000029003231,0.000028630391,0.00010481915,0.000001511621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1369505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38005888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1369505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012230567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004946886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27230668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983390358","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01871-z","title":"Species richness is a surrogate for rare plant occurrence, but not conservation value, in boreal plant communities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Royal Alberta Museum; Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Rare species; Biodiversity; Habitat; Boreal; Temperate climate; Geography; Taiga; Disturbance (geology); Umbrella species; Common species; Body size and species richness; Biology; Endangered species","score_opus":0.031905891821433933,"score_gpt":0.20613330320687975,"score_spread":0.1742274113854458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983390358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99663264,0.00012282848,0.0013822014,0.000029493427,0.000007641952,0.0000076462375,0.00026278733,0.000012018741,0.0015426787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989214,0.000016236396,0.00077599887,0.000010972734,0.000006571104,0.0000064860874,0.00014123271,0.0000033976971,0.00011775197],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790597,0.0010528245,0.00014987541,0.00040713078,0.00038229092,0.00010186441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98805606,0.004820491,0.004201833,0.001174815,0.000626415,0.0011203957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025648726,0.00031870307,0.00038952753,0.0020872958,0.000919838,0.0010164585,0.00041600663,0.00039194536,0.0014308786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070992075,0.00028031386,0.0003376511,0.001394664,0.0015347535,0.0013642787,0.0008261234,0.00059630355,0.00016431576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013780972,0.00008296272,0.9903239,0.00004748268,0.00021487374,0.000046324967,0.00046267884,0.00038794155,0.0030057456,0.0003313468,0.00011814523,0.004840784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037553564,0.00010199335,0.99710923,0.000009338391,0.000029686342,0.00030026725,0.00042533965,0.0009151876,0.00038028826,0.00047007992,0.00024480515,0.000009955596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037222249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020443546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037222249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041769588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001859378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013564527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984645489","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01893-7","title":"Historical changes in bumble bee body size and range shift of declining species","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station; National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research","keywords":"Ecology; Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Ecosystem; Population; Population size; Species distribution; Geography; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.06157236038063056,"score_gpt":0.18584466474950379,"score_spread":0.12427230436887322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984645489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99904186,0.00026501258,0.00003631311,0.00005769407,0.0000031975917,0.0000013916919,0.00017338892,0.0000025365061,0.0004184673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999553,0.00007483321,0.000033193355,0.000013673913,0.0000042269007,0.0000019110405,0.0001237267,0.0000015836329,0.00019381549],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998479,0.00003284356,0.000012616179,0.00004105355,0.000021533499,0.000044005992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880624,0.00017062016,0.0005191252,0.00007426857,0.0002567585,0.00017298537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004316846,0.00008696803,0.00012897895,0.0012517525,0.0005235588,0.0004544084,0.00035314693,0.000431967,0.0030294722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020183434,0.00015829533,0.00011634769,0.0009827563,0.000617111,0.0005378636,0.00038553932,0.0003664634,0.00028095412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023481977,0.00003370261,0.98552805,0.00003487822,0.000041965817,0.00011072422,0.0010070514,0.00016120222,0.002615485,0.00017498403,0.00033935744,0.009717748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.2313794e-7,0.000008320068,0.99960166,0.0000017598195,0.0000026026435,0.000038846698,0.00010920353,0.000032728738,0.000029403254,0.000006012596,0.00016829735,7.2856386e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027001565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07348754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027001565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078260753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016165953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053688765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994427699","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01917-2","title":"Stormwater ponds as habitat for Odonata in urban areas: the importance of obligate wetland plant species","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Odonata; Stormwater; Wetland; Habitat; Ecology; Environmental science; Species richness; Biodiversity; Surface runoff; Urban ecology; Urbanization; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.014879459863939673,"score_gpt":0.1753061361143282,"score_spread":0.1604266762503885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994427699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989349,0.00006847524,0.00006621112,0.00002386621,0.0000013435022,0.0000039020833,0.00003657045,0.0000018848649,0.0008628788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996282,0.000044250566,0.000101530306,0.000007061391,0.0000010085803,0.0000014336853,0.000022719725,5.296609e-7,0.00019324462],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986255,0.000029957706,0.000008046737,0.000021368927,0.00002736972,0.00005059605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997043,0.0000377336,0.00008962324,0.000015777901,0.00004896988,0.00010356252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024600545,0.00013480625,0.00019293923,0.0007290262,0.0008210017,0.00078620366,0.00027029277,0.0002026302,0.0020523134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049303693,0.00009939451,0.00011405276,0.000756757,0.00071141985,0.0005956259,0.0008501812,0.00014010955,0.00009525463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011767099,0.000039571492,0.98019916,0.00004097612,0.00002044326,0.00022840417,0.0011057331,0.00009726953,0.0041055256,0.0004226284,0.00017879858,0.013443867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022530369,0.000025436217,0.9962245,0.000010063198,0.000010207223,0.00011881914,0.0025982268,0.00030004262,0.00013372897,0.00011808791,0.00045633488,0.0000022398615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024306243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21262579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024306243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005096455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008321714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048329532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001843708","doi":"10.1007/s10531-020-01931-9","title":"Inuit cultural practices increase local-scale biodiversity and create novel vegetation communities in Nunatsiavut (Labrador, Canada)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Archaeology and ancient environmental studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Saint Mary's University; Makivik Corporation","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Nasivvik Centre for Inuit Health and Changing Environments; Carleton University","keywords":"Biodiversity; Circumpolar star; Geography; Indigenous; Plant community; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Disturbance (geology); Habitat; Fishing; Ecosystem; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Species richness; Biology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.03096645766206426,"score_gpt":0.18610115418791773,"score_spread":0.15513469652585346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001843708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953986,0.00020832106,0.00012427656,0.00022649988,0.0000065810978,0.000019070192,0.00014016927,0.000007412578,0.0038690334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99537873,0.00018879242,0.00041330245,0.00007595201,0.0000015101143,0.0000139831545,0.000086690554,0.000009114558,0.0038318816],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956006,0.00007488685,0.000012685855,0.0000696534,0.00007897793,0.00020373739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944776,0.000059430688,0.00008044001,0.000020205487,0.00018392525,0.00020818658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037852782,0.00026409404,0.00031875624,0.0011080686,0.009394671,0.0025457663,0.0014710207,0.0003810686,0.0032064053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096101145,0.0002696246,0.000207349,0.0021319238,0.0022826784,0.00048546807,0.0016518389,0.00068858906,0.00022250398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043758625,0.00039071814,0.694035,0.0003028419,0.00012737236,0.0021330644,0.20538346,0.0005924278,0.0061851223,0.007196021,0.004561626,0.07865483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016568529,0.0000706569,0.7836627,0.00021350988,0.00006221414,0.00040611177,0.20317493,0.000620939,0.00078880775,0.00053421216,0.010412119,0.000037280683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9918858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029868323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029868323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021440208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21671087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034776110","doi":"10.1007/s10531-020-01998-4","title":"Identifying biodiversity knowledge gaps for conserving South Africa’s endemic flora","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Foundation, United Arab Emirates; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Threatened species; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Species richness; Geography; Ecology; Endemism; Conservation biology; Flora (microbiology); Distribution (mathematics); Habitat; Global biodiversity; Biodiversity hotspot; Taxon; Population; Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.1197108149383481,"score_gpt":0.24292839344583617,"score_spread":0.12321757850748806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034776110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82029617,0.03566852,0.04418696,0.06696409,0.00043877368,0.000302966,0.013065441,0.00020653197,0.018870562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97241193,0.0039463267,0.020763814,0.00085626607,0.00006683371,0.00014002595,0.0016003122,0.0000144471605,0.00019992974],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795246,0.0011390252,0.00018895321,0.00024606523,0.00023511413,0.00023844592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728635,0.017814478,0.0038403748,0.0018513423,0.002577314,0.0010530045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009049733,0.0004099071,0.0005555689,0.0066930573,0.0013455529,0.0029548374,0.0011065202,0.0007787436,0.004898056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037325423,0.00029245936,0.00031785617,0.0069073923,0.001189144,0.0062553673,0.003656051,0.001286763,0.00026459206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031059337,0.00023324057,0.3768993,0.0067643505,0.00046937107,0.0014739895,0.024357624,0.015099918,0.0054979646,0.029404199,0.018233668,0.52125573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072452465,0.00024151178,0.47687185,0.023253297,0.00054098957,0.0011815736,0.07389954,0.044978697,0.004401263,0.164403,0.20996854,0.00018724804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031133825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05264856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031133825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002992502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007839008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061905205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043770668","doi":"10.1007/s10531-020-02008-3","title":"No statistical support for wolf control and maternal penning as conservation measures for endangered mountain caribou","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia; University of Victoria; University of Alberta; Raincoast Conservation Foundation; Coquitlam College","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Ecotype; Endangered species; Geography; Ecology; Population; Habitat; Adaptive management; Wildlife management; Threatened species; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.021918338701736775,"score_gpt":0.21746868339356829,"score_spread":0.19555034469183152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043770668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789007,0.002905817,0.0057463944,0.0038099254,0.00067681016,0.000120488134,0.0011319924,0.0000785096,0.006629405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980763,0.00006521175,0.0007424046,0.00037302636,0.0001242543,0.00003073568,0.0001858314,0.000010038375,0.00039215377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9650289,0.020787938,0.0015350706,0.005616945,0.004904792,0.002126416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89674354,0.07504197,0.012920113,0.005318712,0.0043132813,0.0056624277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038630318,0.0006134424,0.00067799207,0.0022995085,0.00072992576,0.0015510995,0.0029471363,0.0016705166,0.0069011254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063579015,0.00029965176,0.0024484107,0.0014997198,0.0029508616,0.0017975474,0.0016597363,0.0021353909,0.000291591],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035106572,0.00036302154,0.96857655,0.00025599147,0.004066785,0.00026046328,0.00057980535,0.0008010437,0.0012138322,0.0019670422,0.0018583015,0.016546473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022983536,0.0029510842,0.97095203,0.00016101809,0.0030019796,0.00025042763,0.0022633716,0.013310645,0.0009082894,0.0019337086,0.0039989618,0.000038603383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017605906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019507807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038630318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011436604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016776426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20429909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081657399","doi":"10.1007/s10531-020-02038-x","title":"Southern Canada’s crisis ecoregions: identifying the most significant and threatened places for biodiversity conservation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; University of Waterloo; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Ministry of Environment - Saskatchewan; University of Toronto; Dalhousie University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Nature Conservancy of Canada; Ministry of Environment; Wildlife Conservation Society; Nature Conservancy; University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Biodiversity; Threatened species; Geography; Measurement of biodiversity; Habitat; Environmental resource management; Biodiversity hotspot; Ecoregion; Conservation biology; Global biodiversity; Ecology; Biodiversity conservation; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.0346444573388222,"score_gpt":0.19873734423693515,"score_spread":0.16409288689811294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081657399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725379,0.0005921078,0.0007155328,0.00055115065,0.000010040808,0.00014404434,0.008722708,0.00005251443,0.016673971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990621,0.00042432942,0.002235123,0.00009223532,0.0000026856565,0.00007049504,0.0039124703,0.000010572749,0.0026310892],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995783,0.000025320865,0.000015296737,0.000038464175,0.00016723444,0.00017551793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799937,0.0001098702,0.00025200006,0.00004474947,0.0011660968,0.00042789106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044823656,0.00035299006,0.00022813964,0.004541367,0.003131162,0.001960105,0.0007349552,0.00025734922,0.003330891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017193297,0.0001655113,0.00025107714,0.0055036834,0.00089084107,0.00040606392,0.0014688169,0.00031560083,0.00021111885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012129536,0.000020004145,0.95081896,0.00015389571,0.000045256,0.00027817846,0.003630978,0.0014946408,0.00097288704,0.0009777512,0.00921316,0.03227305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048978072,0.000012059429,0.97939074,0.00009519685,0.000018756458,0.000058747206,0.011759397,0.0011133743,0.00019099045,0.00021802208,0.0071219574,0.00001591245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98635304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99609923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015228772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015228772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03141297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110493004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092232286","doi":"10.1007/s10531-020-02061-y","title":"Unexpected high forest turtle diversity in hill forests in northern Vietnam","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Threatened species; Evergreen forest; IUCN Red List; Turtle (robot); Geography; Fauna; Endangered species; Ecology; Bamboo; Critically endangered; Near-threatened species; Biodiversity; Evergreen; Habitat; Agroforestry; Biology","score_opus":0.02122470571562577,"score_gpt":0.18148564449108534,"score_spread":0.16026093877545958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092232286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992243,0.00004297802,0.00002292257,0.000053207445,0.0000023451812,0.0000016744214,0.00009672323,0.0000010070264,0.0005548162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99974793,0.00002492198,0.00002119796,0.000015155076,0.0000019311724,0.0000014089279,0.00005641743,5.254927e-7,0.00013055855],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998467,0.000029743553,0.000006667439,0.000036280653,0.000024472585,0.000056092616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959964,0.000056542955,0.000114942966,0.000018035678,0.00006477206,0.00014604756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021541577,0.000070391274,0.00013176225,0.0005928718,0.0007721952,0.0005700676,0.0002323432,0.000166621,0.0011797616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003498079,0.00010723344,0.00007160983,0.0006081397,0.00062271225,0.00029154762,0.00034270386,0.00021049716,0.000071508766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036022255,0.000013683972,0.99125165,0.000034857112,0.000024672505,0.00047432238,0.0023002601,0.00008044581,0.0017695664,0.0001386899,0.00027647777,0.0035993499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.081145e-7,0.000007992563,0.99572766,0.0000060466855,0.0000028626384,0.00013721567,0.003698959,0.000050733932,0.000038746955,0.00004067902,0.00028676746,0.0000015086914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066273436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19065815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066273436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095543097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000671457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13177538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108886514","doi":"10.1007/s10531-020-02086-3","title":"Response to O’Connell et al. (2020): There are multiple ways to adapt taxonomy to conservation goals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Taxonomy (biology); Biodiversity conservation; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Geography; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.08827944417919595,"score_gpt":0.22373430076128625,"score_spread":0.1354548565820903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108886514","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00062971207,0.00076845515,0.0003316609,0.9738594,0.022064645,0.000023109773,0.00033035624,0.000087859444,0.0019047647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034800346,0.00047542193,0.00084015174,0.98199964,0.0064125434,0.00006305165,0.00020523542,0.000048263133,0.006475658],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99252856,0.0015649749,0.0004981115,0.00082629063,0.0033358028,0.0012462701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94706947,0.01772253,0.0038244592,0.0012471984,0.015839921,0.01429642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0109638935,0.0013310867,0.001255488,0.0012011325,0.0047886656,0.0054266164,0.0036098645,0.05103363,0.02615964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04436859,0.0009256896,0.0010352264,0.0014637155,0.00438437,0.004870682,0.005247417,0.03716493,0.011723406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050847895,0.000022791803,0.00037369234,0.000093287985,0.00000994019,0.00011999165,0.00020277394,0.00007510934,0.00025009908,0.0010908988,0.9923734,0.00533714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048868176,0.00006521697,0.0037589434,0.00047153715,0.000028421277,0.0003791761,0.0018256953,0.00040604197,0.0006040391,0.0060625784,0.9862292,0.000120222074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019955497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040566873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05103363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005328337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01820357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08751273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126266109","doi":"10.1007/s10531-021-02114-w","title":"Short term, but high risk of predation for endangered mountain caribou during seasonal migration","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Geography; Ecology; Predation; Endangered species; Ungulate; Woodland caribou; Range (aeronautics); Abundance (ecology); Camera trap; Population; Subspecies; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.01216992768786329,"score_gpt":0.19024674807946498,"score_spread":0.1780768203916017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126266109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99965644,0.000060616952,0.000017922182,0.000035284593,0.0000035455525,0.0000011428207,0.000029039818,7.084292e-7,0.00019527908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996153,0.000037305148,0.000028813853,0.00000925407,0.0000027217116,0.0000015717321,0.00005992605,6.7469637e-7,0.00024426953],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998417,0.00004579049,0.00000953611,0.000027710712,0.00001821503,0.000057016696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990908,0.0001738846,0.00027454548,0.00005936138,0.0000909495,0.00031045204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033108066,0.00018061207,0.00020722885,0.00033214482,0.00062562,0.00071768597,0.00023642868,0.00061458146,0.0016825893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018716163,0.00013823867,0.00029039718,0.00021589939,0.00024644283,0.00033693705,0.00043773858,0.00032607312,0.00016551068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023606232,0.000078011195,0.9958763,0.000007981066,0.00006379962,0.0002441378,0.0003581571,0.00008001143,0.0006893823,0.000039585233,0.00013675001,0.0021897138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012747341,0.00006228683,0.998965,0.000003694378,0.0000108467375,0.000107498694,0.000661093,0.00007736876,0.000021526697,0.00003475908,0.000052602005,0.0000020366504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02540368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08165208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02540368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026170956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040559118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0505116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130187957","doi":"10.1007/s10531-021-02119-5","title":"Local ecological knowledge to assist conservation status assessments in data poor contexts: a case study with the threatened sharks of the Brazilian Northeast","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Instituto Serrapilheira; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Threatened species; Data deficient; Conservation status; Near-threatened species; Conservation-dependent species; Biodiversity; Endangered species; Geography; Ecology; IUCN protected area categories; Fishery; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Global biodiversity; Critically endangered; Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science; Habitat","score_opus":0.03517318636342088,"score_gpt":0.27170251933226797,"score_spread":0.2365293329688471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130187957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99484646,0.000123214,0.00056102563,0.0009622534,0.000003708975,0.00004480225,0.000045157038,0.000004419437,0.0034090583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985337,0.00012146769,0.0009408159,0.00004714697,0.0000014188396,0.000013426893,0.000019480423,0.0000016878213,0.00032088658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877256,0.00078774994,0.000055489418,0.00007119982,0.00013664756,0.00017624564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99408746,0.0033940505,0.0008029712,0.0004306845,0.000730402,0.0005544838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034325437,0.00022305496,0.0001858786,0.0012992604,0.0029868688,0.0016771588,0.0006528349,0.0004656847,0.0020121904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009729964,0.0001781938,0.00013607786,0.0012115141,0.0018315328,0.0015353537,0.002139615,0.00050521357,0.00008173845],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014684015,0.0005775269,0.70891565,0.0003270172,0.00005437367,0.006958599,0.14440195,0.0011896214,0.0022709474,0.003220136,0.0015170296,0.13042037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024344028,0.0004094901,0.5302702,0.00064786815,0.00013171895,0.0027838964,0.4459855,0.0036042638,0.00088916876,0.0030696793,0.012146423,0.000037381495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0806003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3066584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0806003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019207663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034037738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16026229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145343671","doi":"10.1007/s10531-021-02162-2","title":"Garry oak ecosystem stand history in Southwest British Columbia, Canada: implications of environmental change and indigenous land use for ecological restoration and population recovery","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada; Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions","keywords":"Edaphic; Geography; Marsh; Ecology; Ecosystem; Population; Wetland","score_opus":0.02486955900795022,"score_gpt":0.16640877555615555,"score_spread":0.14153921654820534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145343671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99657863,0.0005947338,0.00004546302,0.00021118541,0.000005255013,0.000013497851,0.00087441393,0.000007291467,0.001669508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978149,0.00039972484,0.00014350454,0.00007331788,0.0000020657226,0.0000088190245,0.00045186662,0.0000026895607,0.0011030976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997285,0.000030231833,0.00001302474,0.00004236605,0.00006335163,0.00012247665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879444,0.00007733453,0.0001507148,0.000032201322,0.0005479457,0.00039735826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003656615,0.00017252813,0.00021534205,0.0011853679,0.002081659,0.0010198958,0.00078180135,0.00026157236,0.0015734334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076945685,0.00014686925,0.00013832674,0.0017911318,0.00060055556,0.00025530395,0.00051904283,0.00039461852,0.0001587562],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045953457,0.000049938408,0.97734594,0.000049357266,0.00003355569,0.0003027227,0.0014655755,0.00021744224,0.0010174925,0.000104896404,0.0016637822,0.017703414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002441744,0.0000066102234,0.9966679,0.000025834008,0.0000068943427,0.000028957118,0.0022648221,0.00018711382,0.00004834849,0.00001533576,0.000741909,0.0000038443195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99897873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012984935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012984935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012002537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09421271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157148479","doi":"10.1007/s10531-021-02188-6","title":"State of seahorse fisheries in India, nearly two decades after they were banned","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Aquatic life and conservation","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Ocean Park Conservation Foundation, Hong Kong; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Seahorse; Fishery; Fishing; Bycatch; Context (archaeology); Geography; Habitat; Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.020928885482236825,"score_gpt":0.1935994235844044,"score_spread":0.1726705381021676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157148479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91626596,0.003897031,0.00051321246,0.0073204855,0.00038001238,0.000032464854,0.0076394347,0.00014826295,0.063803256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878805,0.0013673503,0.00019592945,0.0005276843,0.00004036883,0.000009862306,0.0011366233,0.000008245689,0.008833482],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997278,0.00002490299,0.000025638621,0.00003308497,0.000071804076,0.00011678206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989973,0.00018162827,0.00032485355,0.00006481364,0.00026366973,0.0001677293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021314224,0.00010032818,0.000090253016,0.0009792611,0.00080261077,0.0014235637,0.00038240108,0.000272943,0.003527856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007277584,0.00012179806,0.0001443577,0.0014114804,0.001255769,0.00047026892,0.00079277286,0.0005853798,0.00059254054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038095543,0.00018882813,0.78524625,0.0012741385,0.00013675631,0.002484978,0.012572287,0.0006576164,0.005850873,0.02521751,0.026137194,0.13985267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046321898,0.000041896652,0.93614477,0.00017646771,0.000034328983,0.00066762156,0.008403255,0.0001359313,0.00063245377,0.0008444092,0.052879654,0.000034619352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.103345156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17530315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103345156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013104203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004763034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20548725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165624877","doi":"10.1007/s10531-021-02206-7","title":"Correlates of extinction vulnerability in Canadian’s prairie ecoregion","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ecoregion; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Vulnerability (computing); Habitat; Biodiversity; Threatened species; Ecology; Geography; Predictability; Biology; Taxon; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Statistics","score_opus":0.015082516974654207,"score_gpt":0.2018655737752892,"score_spread":0.18678305680063498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165624877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99847895,0.00007482412,0.00004314329,0.000091237016,0.0000014683853,0.0000029171656,0.0001834362,0.0000017503269,0.0011222784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997243,0.00003192995,0.000028006087,0.000010241548,0.0000011531217,0.0000012263065,0.000079863676,9.319875e-7,0.00012232718],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994808,0.000056989866,0.000026416677,0.000099767305,0.00014322306,0.00019276903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963309,0.00058613415,0.0010342504,0.00020659006,0.0011514276,0.00069077057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057741004,0.00010973836,0.00014545077,0.0012839638,0.0018437463,0.0007610121,0.0008487089,0.00033186184,0.0013429553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037615735,0.00015611136,0.00019813771,0.0017396965,0.0012402424,0.00044011322,0.0007981175,0.00051257026,0.000058396647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020193766,0.000011918437,0.99692374,0.000004933433,0.000034794903,0.000038952876,0.00054665026,0.00026667683,0.0002097829,0.00017579779,0.00020454568,0.00156197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.1132393e-7,0.0000014471495,0.99930274,0.0000018775613,0.0000022822878,0.000022134485,0.0003991521,0.00011369613,0.0000126826735,0.000021242764,0.00012099359,0.0000013913015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93269795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98177904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06730205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005431305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005017292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13539678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214256792","doi":"10.1007/s10531-021-02321-5","title":"Population structure of a grassland songbird (Dolichonyx oryzivorus) to inform conservation units","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Toyota Motor Corporation","keywords":"Population; Biology; Genetic structure; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Habitat; Biodiversity; Conservation genetics; Geography; Breeding bird survey; Genetic variation; Microsatellite; Demography; Genetics","score_opus":0.019770958962203895,"score_gpt":0.22132101201800206,"score_spread":0.20155005305579815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214256792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99944955,0.00002400104,0.00027801032,0.000011284584,7.2455225e-7,0.000002052065,0.000033453045,0.0000020627272,0.00019888257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99931777,0.000014808693,0.00048174136,0.000007824245,9.882414e-7,0.0000022072663,0.000049938033,9.359515e-7,0.0001238847],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999473,0.000014181792,0.000002086455,0.000021107788,0.0000065557647,0.000008693637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998684,0.000022635553,0.000053428823,0.000010764367,0.000019994768,0.000024797426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018478067,0.00007186458,0.00007359934,0.0004837771,0.00020249518,0.00020872582,0.00017498594,0.00009020982,0.0005931833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024525932,0.00004414034,0.00005584476,0.00023067492,0.00016048031,0.00015205811,0.00019318443,0.00014316305,0.00006582715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013612196,0.00014618163,0.9219069,0.000019000487,0.00006365723,0.000052315187,0.00053984346,0.0013006418,0.055684015,0.0007077573,0.00018239119,0.019261153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056574,0.000060251466,0.99452496,0.000003948579,0.000014006914,0.000052367504,0.00040994212,0.003431163,0.00094482687,0.00019260988,0.00035737953,0.0000030048461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0085847955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019729892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0085847955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037939014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001530744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017069638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W335081357","doi":"10.1023/a:1022811010951","title":"Assessing tillage disturbance on assemblages of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) by using a range of ecological indices","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Species evenness; Diversity index; Disturbance (geology); Species richness; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Biodiversity; Alpha diversity; Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis; Null model; Species diversity; Diversity (politics); Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.02941387798063473,"score_gpt":0.24080616532621948,"score_spread":0.21139228734558474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W335081357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99968374,0.000029158973,0.000110004316,0.000002284733,6.139431e-7,0.0000036420797,0.0000342308,0.0000023778475,0.0001340204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895096,0.000071430884,0.0005816796,0.000007101847,0.0000027796543,0.000008781319,0.00018452817,0.0000016173937,0.0001911573],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999421,0.0002073674,0.00003694991,0.00008808526,0.00018236572,0.00006424421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99552745,0.0018116123,0.0017994628,0.0001766403,0.00028868468,0.00039603814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011305388,0.00043670888,0.00025188012,0.00097459706,0.00034333338,0.0004598307,0.00027681136,0.00025945122,0.00061232934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033620384,0.00020147771,0.00034357177,0.00088343216,0.0003502297,0.0005294873,0.00041823834,0.0003172879,0.000092713395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034761892,0.0001838762,0.9896135,0.000016084507,0.0001494622,0.00003233944,0.00015772827,0.00034050303,0.0043941936,0.000017520817,0.00002747627,0.004719684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042413035,0.00022708927,0.9988067,0.0000015167175,0.000028350569,0.00003448065,0.00005040125,0.00038715487,0.00040090043,0.000013704852,0.000043349715,0.000002076835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00600351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03361531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00600351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040833597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021774552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011937082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W336566289","doi":"10.1023/a:1015544325763","title":"Spatial distribution and habitats of useful plants: an initial assessment for conservation on an indigenous territory, Panama","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Edaphic; Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Spatial distribution; Biodiversity; Canonical correspondence analysis; Distribution (mathematics); Species diversity; Abundance (ecology); Species evenness; Species distribution; Land use; Physical geography; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029189812077847335,"score_gpt":0.25156143628096717,"score_spread":0.22237162420311984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W336566289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993123,0.000048605605,0.00008594373,0.000014503461,3.3340194e-7,0.000010572403,0.000052382657,0.0000016388208,0.00047373414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99925035,0.00006517349,0.00042829695,0.0000038535127,0.000001303233,0.000013156301,0.000076648495,8.020988e-7,0.00016039216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966955,0.0001089488,0.000027202961,0.00006650696,0.00007271702,0.0000551974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903774,0.00026978235,0.00027381995,0.000086436085,0.00019896713,0.0001332756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050966756,0.0002569278,0.00017382982,0.001402674,0.00093778357,0.0005454588,0.0004411131,0.00023273674,0.0010532837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016317173,0.00024850076,0.00020586171,0.0015560908,0.00072065496,0.0007662256,0.0010026557,0.00020048908,0.00007360938],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019939122,0.00009147261,0.97732055,0.00004870622,0.000048473372,0.0003976651,0.0035407036,0.00040539217,0.003491879,0.00016502531,0.000080348495,0.014210364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023140858,0.00009582939,0.99720204,0.0000034529664,0.000023316405,0.00015649066,0.0017623226,0.00033086294,0.00018185307,0.000028240582,0.0002103873,0.0000028934876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048284844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18201666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048284844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083699066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003558767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096007586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206123384","doi":"10.1007/s10531-022-02361-5","title":"Exploring cultural differences in wildlife value orientations using student samples in seven nations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University; Deakin University","keywords":"Wildlife; Mutualism (biology); Biodiversity; Wildlife conservation; Geography; Value (mathematics); Wildlife trade; Demographics; Wildlife management; Ecology; Socioeconomics; Environmental resource management; Political science; Sociology; Demography; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.4411213830356951,"score_gpt":0.3663276589375813,"score_spread":0.0747937240981138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206123384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99963,0.000010259439,0.00007038467,0.0000101061805,0.0000023776563,0.000017483777,0.000033060787,5.0138095e-7,0.00022586486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99944335,0.00002254391,0.00017758916,0.000018196593,0.0000024385884,0.00007147563,0.00009947836,0.0000014034893,0.00016349004],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976078,0.0012015618,0.00022094467,0.00023888425,0.00037767377,0.0003530984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993731,0.0026414106,0.0010981554,0.0005600231,0.0012849944,0.00068452494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037891814,0.00035149237,0.0004404427,0.0013851752,0.0014929425,0.001581281,0.00037476473,0.0005664171,0.0023456248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00826161,0.00036830004,0.0005848695,0.0011533222,0.0011499779,0.0010192222,0.001824044,0.000990421,0.00033183783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013783679,0.00069354905,0.95981264,0.000037869817,0.000076464195,0.00008093662,0.031300146,0.00010530787,0.00057102076,0.00019509344,0.00023836603,0.006750719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002239825,0.00058728934,0.9264988,0.000051044706,0.000038089405,0.00012364447,0.07023294,0.00063716405,0.0006798734,0.00019602232,0.00090876006,0.000023937362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011037629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016850688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011037629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075081893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007515288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021946728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206195881","doi":"10.1007/s10531-021-02316-2","title":"Retraction Note to: Molecular taxonomic tools provide more accurate estimates of species richness at less cost than traditional morphology-based taxonomic practices in a vegetation survey","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":true,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Species richness; Morphology (biology); Vegetation (pathology); Geography; Ecology; Taxonomic rank; Biology; Zoology; Taxon; Medicine","score_opus":0.10217745160173729,"score_gpt":0.26796915114754793,"score_spread":0.16579169954581063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206195881","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030059475,0.0008233257,0.0005936372,0.15997969,0.8352154,0.00004616532,0.00048424694,0.00023362861,0.0023233027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006982995,0.0027470076,0.0047014887,0.28586197,0.5811217,0.00033238798,0.00080382254,0.0005711791,0.116877474],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99604213,0.00051886705,0.00094323274,0.0005405683,0.001467994,0.00048720074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9627115,0.013401886,0.0025322917,0.0022106755,0.016632415,0.0025112748],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050867726,0.0025371416,0.0025498995,0.0025457335,0.0038411403,0.0031933147,0.0041550617,0.015358474,0.019856568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06701439,0.0016161527,0.0018490755,0.0018747377,0.003470651,0.0033359446,0.002230372,0.034754567,0.024474416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001961487,0.00001105404,0.00007078677,0.000077495795,0.000008193165,0.0001423354,0.000044531214,0.00002841335,0.00013002509,0.00037355607,0.9950735,0.004020456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027312786,0.000029016137,0.0025334614,0.00025397414,0.000030881158,0.00040569954,0.00014924874,0.000324183,0.00032381344,0.0009862317,0.9948902,0.00004608894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017260069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019392556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9949132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036482636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050336244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06642687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221028022","doi":"10.1007/s10531-022-02391-z","title":"The potential role of public gardens as sentinels of plant invasion","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Invasive species; Taxon; Introduced species; Standardization; Biodiversity; Geography; Native plant; Ecology; Biology; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Political science","score_opus":0.04598608795611071,"score_gpt":0.16573951739783951,"score_spread":0.1197534294417288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221028022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94941604,0.0012070423,0.022161432,0.002839723,0.00020111365,0.0006461303,0.0018848439,0.00021804964,0.021425566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97287786,0.00036200846,0.023807144,0.0004848236,0.000036921694,0.00032262524,0.00039884404,0.0000314725,0.0016783709],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.988462,0.008000629,0.000386001,0.0009734434,0.0013392183,0.00083878584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9660045,0.012402233,0.008621927,0.0049926355,0.005392625,0.0025861245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020849368,0.0003264084,0.0004575662,0.0020131941,0.002369521,0.0025573643,0.0015691268,0.00055364944,0.0029064268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019026147,0.00039046127,0.00033486358,0.0014976213,0.0022380746,0.0026866586,0.0043711932,0.00063042756,0.00034333646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005008336,0.00018327935,0.86067045,0.0006005597,0.00014280128,0.00040726297,0.023952309,0.0008235023,0.010250979,0.0032653795,0.00473331,0.0944693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047726535,0.000620577,0.85938513,0.0013781614,0.00016905833,0.00038243234,0.06365004,0.0036049683,0.0053506983,0.0054311976,0.059831254,0.0001487841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055502925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17481628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055502925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022390212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005744554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11035973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224302126","doi":"10.1007/s10531-022-02418-5","title":"Are calicioids useful indicators of boreal forest continuity or condition?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Lichen and fungal ecology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Museum of Nature; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Colorado Plateau Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Northern Arizona University; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Biodiversity; Taiga; Boreal; Ecology; Geography; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.02470657039304807,"score_gpt":0.2077507831755975,"score_spread":0.18304421278254943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224302126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815695,0.006718654,0.0015861894,0.0011854267,0.00013557314,0.000027453323,0.0008564164,0.000026335218,0.007894378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975835,0.00078366575,0.0008407006,0.00015778048,0.000058547324,0.0000075789467,0.00022407788,0.0000031231418,0.00034093164],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993036,0.00024118045,0.00006758324,0.00014130346,0.0001230107,0.0001233488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99346995,0.0012588348,0.0031071939,0.00042551386,0.0009822742,0.000756323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001925971,0.00038357326,0.00059173856,0.0012994101,0.0005090257,0.001675613,0.00074038,0.0010460862,0.00168849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005087207,0.00017858416,0.00023774723,0.001961708,0.0016069119,0.0019457836,0.0005398435,0.00067099766,0.00030368974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029960685,0.00003303976,0.97617173,0.000052908777,0.00008386059,0.000048679507,0.00014735323,0.000081314116,0.0015913837,0.00017548648,0.00023001754,0.021084566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011486577,0.00014218286,0.9964616,0.000038017195,0.00004762475,0.00015361734,0.001086585,0.00020782085,0.00035514781,0.0002683527,0.001219214,0.000008424928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01562828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04588214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01562828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051523966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044848255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031074643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234956099","doi":"10.1007/s10531-005-5397-6","title":"Impacts of Selective Logging and Agricultural Clearing on Forest Structure, Floristic Composition and Diversity, and Timber Tree Regeneration in the Ituri Forest, Democratic Republic of Congo","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"African Botany and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; International Tropical Timber Organization","keywords":"Secondary forest; Logging; Agroforestry; Old-growth forest; Biodiversity; Deforestation (computer science); Geography; Forest farming; Forest restoration; Forest management; Ecology; Forestry; Forest ecology; Biology; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.02428070297560566,"score_gpt":0.1944916245413414,"score_spread":0.17021092156573572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234956099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995468,0.00006679722,0.0000064058795,0.000052758372,0.0000010776746,0.0000017131051,0.00005674205,6.984437e-7,0.00026688658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997303,0.000048214224,0.000015953343,0.000014165306,0.0000012686786,0.000003606795,0.00004184612,5.070885e-7,0.00014406868],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947447,0.00021534688,0.00002569326,0.000058498645,0.000026303462,0.0001996309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917966,0.0002001442,0.00028357035,0.000040275823,0.000068366724,0.00022787732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060597056,0.00025999796,0.00028799652,0.0005451774,0.0011221638,0.00093566213,0.0004572364,0.0003532796,0.0016455771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016122021,0.00017226134,0.00027296384,0.00079738576,0.0011908426,0.0004893302,0.0008731543,0.0004274888,0.00014944344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079503265,0.00033161702,0.9833452,0.000056072877,0.0001774126,0.0008399509,0.002154964,0.000834601,0.0033962307,0.0005595316,0.00039150423,0.0071179327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013180302,0.00006729012,0.99666554,0.0000121341245,0.00003961717,0.00011031385,0.002252282,0.00033351473,0.00019806244,0.00004939416,0.0002530777,0.000005580619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16615534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40301406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16615534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029112645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001478863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3303764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238145905","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-5064-z","title":"Searching for biodiversity indicators in running waters: do bryophytes, macroinvertebrates, and fish show congruent diversity patterns?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Biodiversity; Ecology; River ecosystem; Invertebrate; Habitat; Biota; Taxon; Taxonomic rank; Bryophyte; Beta diversity; Species diversity; Dominance (genetics); Biology","score_opus":0.019013516171111477,"score_gpt":0.21381724291171855,"score_spread":0.19480372674060709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238145905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99930465,0.0001159377,0.00018696993,0.00007198934,0.00000283582,0.0000015912984,0.000033667795,0.000002427711,0.00027995868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99945205,0.00007054201,0.00031719802,0.000033774068,0.00000488671,0.0000029235669,0.00006752853,0.0000017209151,0.000049294937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996456,0.00012485788,0.000026090493,0.0000705406,0.0000655644,0.00006741251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809235,0.00052443397,0.00076982443,0.000101202946,0.00018147656,0.00033079815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011437121,0.00024340753,0.0003767417,0.000885469,0.0004234381,0.0008256347,0.00038121614,0.00060385413,0.00080558757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004669338,0.00020845374,0.00022707388,0.0010227287,0.00063510163,0.0012371141,0.00054471585,0.00033272037,0.00016118407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007121211,0.000016181208,0.9934849,0.000014170751,0.000052602598,0.000016077409,0.00018630095,0.00003695842,0.0010654678,0.00003554304,0.00004446911,0.0049761883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040330283,0.000061102175,0.9985637,0.0000064666783,0.000029165358,0.00004563994,0.00058209465,0.0002822118,0.00019911565,0.00015416693,0.000068697125,0.000003544701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039900057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014850263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039900057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015662769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030986013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007933557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242088379","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1369-x","title":"The conservation value of tree decay processes as a key driver structuring tree cavity nest webs in South American temperate rainforests","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Peregrine Fund; Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Neotropical Ornithological Society; Rufford Foundation; Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico; Environment Canada; Idea Wild","keywords":"Obligate; Ecology; Diameter at breast height; Rainforest; Nest (protein structural motif); Biology; Species richness; Biodiversity; Species evenness; Temperate forest; Temperate climate; Geography","score_opus":0.01287158675743803,"score_gpt":0.21937081426644953,"score_spread":0.2064992275090115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242088379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99975103,0.00005057994,0.000055465225,0.000024537945,4.57402e-7,6.316339e-7,0.000009475525,5.807004e-7,0.000107287786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998609,0.000020516229,0.00004422703,0.0000054745824,0.0000011532463,6.2916547e-7,0.000012391225,7.703273e-7,0.0000539262],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970144,0.000105198706,0.000017958355,0.00007539364,0.000038099064,0.000061772625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99588794,0.0016975788,0.0012738066,0.0003383247,0.00036613314,0.00043616185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012580928,0.00013060082,0.00019082754,0.00068121165,0.00075562665,0.0009925063,0.00036128476,0.00042817215,0.0015412318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00397015,0.00018934532,0.00016919992,0.00043596642,0.0013795912,0.0007142809,0.00062404096,0.00048047124,0.00008160053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000742589,0.000039436876,0.99274313,0.000017265143,0.0000557717,0.00003547216,0.00088920613,0.00018976134,0.0023997142,0.00018018439,0.000028668483,0.0033471752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010484637,0.000010080645,0.99867153,0.0000028533757,0.00001330819,0.000024783336,0.0005775865,0.00046985614,0.0000721562,0.00010324411,0.000051710525,0.0000018039952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015789703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.076481104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015789703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005103973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050413504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031395555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247150230","doi":"10.1023/a:1008950708167","title":"Killer Algae","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Geography; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.03647458134111117,"score_gpt":0.21267425128573691,"score_spread":0.17619966994462574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247150230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052978907,0.004138305,0.0021113579,0.005015826,0.0021710107,0.00012644018,0.0008807293,0.0007288582,0.9318486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21113455,0.0054746913,0.0029927765,0.0022198597,0.00040846915,0.00006559625,0.002212066,0.00009553997,0.77539647],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971694,0.000018214565,0.0000107291025,0.000050793507,0.000120632794,0.00008266235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973136,0.000010116714,0.000031501528,0.000034466455,0.00008507213,0.0001074658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025402848,0.00048173624,0.00030386235,0.0012251,0.0019321395,0.0019846172,0.0006271812,0.00081407337,0.06355304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042978517,0.00014302225,0.00037737106,0.00075213984,0.00083032396,0.0012027365,0.0027526058,0.0012323633,0.022319943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003409935,0.00028825764,0.01701215,0.00067032676,0.000039142382,0.0014778754,0.001562937,0.0001754834,0.04125432,0.064472355,0.2520334,0.62067276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012798446,0.00007831883,0.008594249,0.00006741018,0.0000158543,0.0012107121,0.0011532643,0.000072535106,0.0038616667,0.0030191247,0.9819057,0.000008282959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054223333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010680685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06355304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009638577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001320689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21260607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307156803","doi":"10.1007/s10531-022-02483-w","title":"Flight speed and time of day heavily influence rainforest canopy wildlife counts from drone-mounted thermal camera surveys","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bobolink Foundation; International Conservation Fund of Canada; New Venture Fund; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation","keywords":"Wildlife; Drone; Diel vertical migration; Rainforest; Habitat; Aerial survey; Geography; Environmental science; Biodiversity; Canopy; Remote sensing; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.009208944017784314,"score_gpt":0.19501569953889664,"score_spread":0.1858067555211123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307156803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969963,0.00029700805,0.0010782931,0.00003422304,0.000020046084,0.000014333793,0.00055348437,0.000017243781,0.0009889931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982048,0.00009285081,0.000684765,0.000028468261,0.000009282323,0.00000868864,0.00063542003,0.000016737798,0.00031906195],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991629,0.0003072295,0.00006559028,0.00022638262,0.00014719229,0.00009062929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942047,0.003472465,0.001139679,0.00033135567,0.0005385989,0.00031323664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009930704,0.000335782,0.0003147841,0.00059340545,0.00023276627,0.0009463693,0.00022614439,0.00023573585,0.002415905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005699454,0.00021897514,0.00036081614,0.00038694328,0.00019259461,0.00055466255,0.00034069494,0.00028182523,0.00054933334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017310644,0.000033727298,0.98645705,0.000052668256,0.00018674924,0.000040334504,0.00013871568,0.00046588926,0.0032390482,0.000021035712,0.00024856583,0.008942992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010947978,0.000054359738,0.99803215,0.000014308333,0.000031657415,0.00007228069,0.00016497473,0.00093478407,0.00044054032,0.000019019275,0.0002284592,0.000006305392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003711708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011130669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003711708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013863653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010813811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008081973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313352192","doi":"10.1007/s10531-022-02527-1","title":"Degree of egg-taking by humans determines the fate of maleo (Macrocephalon maleo) nesting grounds across Sulawesi","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Conservation Fund of Canada; Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional","keywords":"Nesting (process); Habitat; Predation; Geography; Ecology; Threatened species; Endangered species; Biology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03540718010385877,"score_gpt":0.2292284934746844,"score_spread":0.19382131337082564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313352192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995036,0.000030940144,0.00004816129,0.000019318615,9.889305e-7,0.0000019576437,0.000060404283,0.0000014733363,0.0003331999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99974173,0.000022471018,0.00005665604,0.0000048298966,6.334492e-7,0.0000018842026,0.000046954996,6.8763006e-7,0.00012417341],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999064,0.000024983285,0.0000058147925,0.000030283734,0.000011986367,0.00002041894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999729,0.000033731467,0.00014020012,0.00001466206,0.000032332835,0.000050125138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015135782,0.00015897055,0.00013258273,0.0004194633,0.0003024842,0.00031317933,0.00014910269,0.00009820535,0.0012414911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039385556,0.00010625678,0.00013060244,0.0003990645,0.00033000924,0.00019494117,0.00027006093,0.00014037995,0.00016201568],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022873062,0.000011988725,0.99648917,0.0000071640334,0.0000136845965,0.00006930927,0.00028738857,0.00002938052,0.0007852417,0.000025197662,0.0000668154,0.0021919152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.7660178e-7,0.000008302949,0.9993475,0.0000029562532,0.0000045400407,0.000039153143,0.0003879736,0.00007940184,0.000040642655,0.000009278568,0.00007900265,9.13459e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019851707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062428214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019851707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022373484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016658907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03947234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323075763","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02559-1","title":"Direct and indirect effects of agricultural land cover on avian biodiversity in eastern Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","keywords":"Species richness; Biodiversity; Agriculture; Agroforestry; Geography; Shrub; Agricultural land; Ecology; Land cover; Land use; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.011209998599224663,"score_gpt":0.17237986810188458,"score_spread":0.1611698695026599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323075763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99541795,0.0002681366,0.00010552753,0.00012926309,0.0000044529656,0.000009400149,0.0013062073,0.000007095063,0.0027519392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809617,0.00018709642,0.00017036509,0.000022494938,0.0000015924555,0.0000048225907,0.00038823127,0.0000025207228,0.0011267648],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996855,0.000044610737,0.000014127075,0.00005807028,0.00009689994,0.000100772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857044,0.0002808321,0.00018123948,0.000049621744,0.0005540255,0.00036383327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033729977,0.00023310562,0.00021744179,0.0008001961,0.0013743816,0.0009353234,0.0005642707,0.00019044492,0.0035520263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016511424,0.00012731783,0.000283856,0.0012953855,0.00058026944,0.0002577001,0.00061850145,0.00030383424,0.00015066723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060617705,0.00002348359,0.9906803,0.000028621545,0.00007346581,0.000091262766,0.0004412556,0.0007127599,0.00039269263,0.00028284118,0.00056296744,0.0066498625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030150175,0.000009588351,0.9974147,0.000013713018,0.000022817037,0.000019279198,0.0008238199,0.00090641406,0.00006818819,0.00006216496,0.0006503777,0.0000057768516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9912377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017402869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017402869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013390159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12626725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327814391","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02572-4","title":"Plant community and climate differ between former islands and submerged hills by proglacial lake Ojibway in eastern boreal Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Geology and Paleoclimatology Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"Boreal; Taiga; Biodiversity; Ecology; Geography; Climate change; Environmental science; Physical geography; Biology","score_opus":0.02967313065467706,"score_gpt":0.2074775142795846,"score_spread":0.17780438362490755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327814391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992434,0.00006678974,0.00001758398,0.000021023363,0.0000014703563,0.0000036085262,0.0002507939,0.0000021241592,0.00039334162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992238,0.00004882769,0.000051312356,0.000019977784,0.0000010375953,0.0000030592105,0.00022733779,0.000002386031,0.00042223732],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997002,0.000028830375,0.000014894271,0.00007224547,0.000045705307,0.00013812064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992582,0.0000578335,0.00014509933,0.000020204161,0.0002214848,0.00029714158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024194084,0.0001972988,0.00027974436,0.001256006,0.0020663932,0.0010066882,0.0006850525,0.00025057612,0.0017268339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005873921,0.0002264348,0.0003195053,0.0019234519,0.0009759245,0.00047213063,0.0008105827,0.00029129506,0.0001405876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015931771,0.000040790135,0.99023634,0.00002506906,0.000071301925,0.0001158861,0.0035308162,0.00008338473,0.002353001,0.00006764477,0.00025597692,0.003060486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015515066,0.0000047706026,0.9976278,0.0000033577837,0.000005614457,0.000018705776,0.0021273925,0.000048421698,0.000025699577,0.000005332183,0.00012878828,0.0000026738587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9604019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039598107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005456293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004516886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07966256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360958768","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02558-2","title":"Land and deep-sea mining: the challenges of comparing biodiversity impacts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Imperial Metals (Canada)","funders":"National Oceanography Centre; Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer","keywords":"Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Measurement of biodiversity; Harm; Natural resource economics; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.048767923095653955,"score_gpt":0.19752923531325797,"score_spread":0.14876131221760402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360958768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40378255,0.094586745,0.24719484,0.11281814,0.0041003632,0.0008389826,0.0064195516,0.0003321489,0.1299267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9315225,0.008138074,0.052150916,0.00475283,0.000982251,0.0004990799,0.00081812654,0.00012963208,0.0010065853],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.88105524,0.09147258,0.0050403206,0.0043468024,0.016897425,0.0011876635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7930862,0.14791007,0.017572083,0.015365616,0.023246387,0.0028196664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08631938,0.0008599353,0.0014598144,0.011833656,0.0019515314,0.010187452,0.0033431866,0.0021139535,0.0030859667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18681198,0.00034629702,0.0010189775,0.0138045605,0.013834805,0.012400474,0.013611032,0.0036667697,0.0005432651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044520764,0.00023097136,0.14415506,0.005141812,0.0020010697,0.0005213202,0.021507485,0.012162282,0.0013400279,0.2683938,0.018267618,0.52583337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028489072,0.00044196477,0.11327622,0.009052172,0.00033723746,0.0004501096,0.034312516,0.008462349,0.0015392839,0.75372976,0.0781594,0.00021059527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007821785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074649765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08631938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034610399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033854898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45650595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362698465","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02579-x","title":"More than one way to count a cat: estimation of ocelot population density using frameworks for marked and unmarked species","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Scarborough; University of Toronto; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; Bobolink Foundation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Rufford Foundation; International Conservation Fund of Canada","keywords":"Mark and recapture; Camera trap; Population; Wildlife; Population size; Abundance estimation; Biodiversity; Density estimation; Abundance (ecology); Population density; Ecology; Statistics; Geography; Cartography; Biology; Mathematics; Demography","score_opus":0.031526988944675795,"score_gpt":0.2293088740014785,"score_spread":0.19778188505680272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362698465","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18306154,0.0004832446,0.8102027,0.00036931247,0.00007073657,0.00008146444,0.00059069967,0.00033035383,0.004809974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66445756,0.00014303962,0.33290288,0.00007954327,0.000021164647,0.00009866793,0.0003711196,0.000072177914,0.0018537972],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979868,0.00073578046,0.00013089943,0.00046415266,0.00048514086,0.00019719284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972287,0.0012523152,0.00040413107,0.00041157674,0.00055332674,0.00014987645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036966375,0.00058605615,0.00086482946,0.002703794,0.0009943623,0.0021112845,0.0022610517,0.00093994744,0.001988639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008055596,0.0006118285,0.0014427237,0.0022836342,0.0015194222,0.0027277924,0.0025873762,0.0007401229,0.00035568792],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036293827,0.0002581757,0.31623977,0.00047908447,0.0008473236,0.00049941393,0.0025204085,0.13999891,0.009161683,0.087640196,0.002746004,0.43924612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031530537,0.00020829852,0.14056727,0.00022880585,0.00029253497,0.0012187278,0.0020252282,0.76542646,0.0052195573,0.073470205,0.011038317,0.00027307228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02655669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08414392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02655669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009201572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014140495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05280423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362700296","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02586-y","title":"Comparing minimum number of individuals and abundance from non-invasive DNA sampling and camera trapping in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Universidad Rey Juan Carlos","keywords":"Vulpes; Abundance (ecology); Sampling (signal processing); Biology; Population; Relative species abundance; Ecology; Statistics; Mathematics; Demography; Computer science","score_opus":0.039017062427842385,"score_gpt":0.23355159725589603,"score_spread":0.19453453482805363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362700296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99800676,0.0001305923,0.0017310557,0.000008551358,0.0000026612975,0.0000029060423,0.000032986645,0.00000507816,0.00007950058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754363,0.000043820328,0.0021994442,0.0000065322147,0.0000024250373,0.000005578706,0.00010783794,0.0000018962298,0.00008886145],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992679,0.00023555632,0.00005645254,0.0002501589,0.00013391358,0.000056068537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803156,0.0009750244,0.000563343,0.00011034607,0.0002159952,0.00010372323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018633354,0.0002717724,0.0002680874,0.0006629713,0.00019008933,0.00035556624,0.0003210225,0.0003091095,0.00031618148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031551938,0.00020159072,0.0003209922,0.00021996156,0.00017120596,0.00043545122,0.00030519467,0.00017392317,0.00004865947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020124314,0.000059448565,0.977014,0.000052002455,0.0001994186,0.00006698614,0.00015814188,0.0022591574,0.0071433894,0.000056019748,0.00005632273,0.012733801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053986255,0.00030128768,0.97403485,0.000021565053,0.00012900097,0.00022824672,0.00020551484,0.022257533,0.0025604032,0.00006796706,0.00017458691,0.000013614561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037497466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0094999615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037497466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026138214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018181864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009854376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378388883","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02637-4","title":"Why didn’t the caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus) cross the winter road? The effect of industrial traffic on the road-crossing decisions of caribou","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; Kelowna General Hospital; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Geography; Habitat; Range (aeronautics); Disturbance (geology); Arctic; Ecology; Fishery; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.03101704666417988,"score_gpt":0.22924880751239043,"score_spread":0.19823176084821056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378388883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980071,0.000098636476,0.000027205939,0.0004229347,0.000010222621,8.047104e-7,0.000011189556,0.0000011100185,0.0014207296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992138,0.000121023906,0.000031201434,0.00010824516,0.000005486992,0.0000012398929,0.00001510081,0.0000032320008,0.00050064444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947995,0.00026668835,0.000010027138,0.00006862291,0.000045445347,0.0001294099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977725,0.0010851626,0.00046210721,0.00009328009,0.00024805331,0.00033893486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010325571,0.00012028159,0.00015206449,0.0002757446,0.000758391,0.001186705,0.00036780423,0.00078694685,0.003035999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005000125,0.00017163387,0.00024864415,0.0002852369,0.001425342,0.00071963103,0.00036785562,0.00088427094,0.00030264372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074227055,0.00044735472,0.96518344,0.00005021551,0.00027540178,0.0005658168,0.006196292,0.0008917106,0.0032496,0.0011544606,0.001972766,0.019270653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024124629,0.00026944335,0.97064227,0.000042946307,0.00012994536,0.00027761704,0.022102352,0.0008079252,0.0006432645,0.001330775,0.003699854,0.000029411613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08208523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2186412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08208523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010053009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079322245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16321486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380591240","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02625-8","title":"Young farmers’ willingness to protect species at risk in Prince Edward Island","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"University of Prince Edward Island","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Biodiversity; Business; Willingness to accept; Agriculture; Government (linguistics); Habitat; Legislation; Wildlife; Willingness to pay; Environmental resource management; Geography; Environmental planning; Ecology; Political science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.018085049491169132,"score_gpt":0.20288778236828603,"score_spread":0.1848027328771169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380591240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99786985,0.00001794721,0.0000071926756,0.00028382937,0.0000015017229,0.0000020449017,0.000012169787,3.3482348e-7,0.0018050767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975688,0.000053885196,0.000020978205,0.00009500619,0.0000016397321,0.000004254135,0.000015776122,6.744861e-7,0.002239021],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997533,0.00006274573,0.000012482911,0.000023888679,0.000031553456,0.00011602239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711204,0.0009318667,0.0005564552,0.00007788506,0.00037067625,0.0009511881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008679748,0.00007259711,0.00009937195,0.00029478,0.001545629,0.00114272,0.000338296,0.00055465323,0.0044681593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025199808,0.0001371905,0.000091757254,0.00029277854,0.000892471,0.0006248748,0.0008702663,0.0007817865,0.0002763926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029115676,0.00017903894,0.8443132,0.00008073566,0.00004732943,0.0028557146,0.13005674,0.0004577766,0.0023233695,0.0016648174,0.0026589225,0.015071043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005585299,0.000046275705,0.7840918,0.00004751939,0.00000988786,0.00017513151,0.21186736,0.00022318891,0.00016847679,0.0002668917,0.0030851527,0.00001277241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17743334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49692506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8225666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017805751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013395975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35280114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385350290","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02686-9","title":"DNA barcode-based survey documents underestimated diversity and intricate phylogeographic patterns of aquatic Heteroptera in an endangered Balkan biodiversity hotspot: ancient Lake Skadar basin","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej; Wydział Biologii i Ochrony Środowiska, Uniwersytet Łódzki; Narodowe Centrum Nauki; Uniwersytet Szczeciński","keywords":"Biodiversity; Biodiversity hotspot; DNA barcoding; Endangered species; Ecology; Heteroptera; Endemism; Freshwater ecosystem; Geography; Biology; Phylogeography; Habitat; Ecosystem; Phylogenetics","score_opus":0.03818785799354837,"score_gpt":0.2216999389047761,"score_spread":0.18351208091122773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385350290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992091,0.00013573814,0.00014604579,0.000015147168,0.000002370082,0.0000029019945,0.00014194255,0.0000075729013,0.00033914458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991491,0.00006349136,0.00028749387,0.000014023451,0.000002000356,0.0000031904442,0.00025814027,0.000002451453,0.00022008661],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997793,0.00002809832,0.000021758613,0.00006692691,0.000062663705,0.000041250605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976534,0.000032047003,0.00010268205,0.000018709583,0.00004800756,0.00003317104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019663229,0.00016772437,0.00022895483,0.0014628056,0.00039028245,0.0003414677,0.0001753997,0.00026441953,0.0011244377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002781638,0.000121122255,0.00013500474,0.0008219915,0.0005541351,0.00022009436,0.00045905795,0.0001554499,0.0001978221],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008793111,0.000029943087,0.9355365,0.00009881854,0.00004913202,0.00033496166,0.0017024437,0.00016064601,0.04671187,0.000085686705,0.00019066583,0.015011368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019205952,0.000040336992,0.996968,0.0000157671,0.000012372979,0.0003264576,0.0007383968,0.00019975871,0.00079417735,0.000028092996,0.0008707118,0.0000039877264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006146851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016734438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006146851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023115576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003439442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012222111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386094101","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02700-0","title":"Uneven patterns of palm species loss due to climate change are not driven by their sexual systems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Species richness; Climate change; Ecology; Biodiversity; Biology; Dominance (genetics); Arecaceae; Environmental niche modelling; Habitat; Ecological niche; Palm","score_opus":0.11919299464294475,"score_gpt":0.19935300559726432,"score_spread":0.08016001095431957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386094101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997101,0.00028335548,0.0004482123,0.000059549828,0.0000041085855,0.00000553642,0.00025541487,0.000012357388,0.001830403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950266,0.00006190665,0.00009144543,0.000019786497,0.0000033831113,0.0000025136715,0.00012990397,0.000005335834,0.00018296037],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995028,0.00012183165,0.00004105355,0.00017041004,0.00006144142,0.00010241785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997113,0.00060862687,0.001290774,0.00046447484,0.00025950104,0.0002636708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085646764,0.00014010514,0.0003123882,0.0011863993,0.0004509161,0.0009647383,0.00038593388,0.0003162686,0.0047545545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033209787,0.00020941914,0.00030029667,0.00093247695,0.0009835617,0.0009137157,0.000878301,0.00036965747,0.0005290509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044412276,0.000041807645,0.9767219,0.00006275346,0.00026295014,0.000052260002,0.00036525418,0.0004991885,0.009741848,0.00079740665,0.00017995696,0.010830509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026646771,0.00001647159,0.9990036,0.0000026580628,0.000011147914,0.00005279179,0.00015458604,0.00019216302,0.00013418173,0.00028991932,0.00013709064,0.0000027193744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019687375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046450524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047545545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034143645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017746654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015905559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390616218","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02753-1","title":"Cryptic genotypic and phenotypic diversity in parapatric bumble bee populations associated with minimum cold temperatures","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre; University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Parapatric speciation; Biology; Gene flow; Species complex; Population; Ecology; Biodiversity; Evolutionary biology; Genetic diversity; Range (aeronautics); Local adaptation; Genetic variation; Genetics; Gene","score_opus":0.06598458992310145,"score_gpt":0.19973620080713061,"score_spread":0.13375161088402915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390616218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998512,0.000017054515,0.000022954895,0.0000034918535,4.963826e-7,0.0000011095124,0.00002347896,6.455387e-7,0.00007955308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998616,0.000006143953,0.000028016986,0.0000042051797,9.498446e-7,0.0000024255849,0.00003460956,0.000001269488,0.000060822127],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969435,0.00008925481,0.000016883132,0.000100526784,0.000037068672,0.00006191911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941635,0.00016929841,0.00019645384,0.000050611925,0.00005914358,0.00010824356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023438175,0.00018476712,0.00028198137,0.0013811745,0.00066240574,0.0005761275,0.0003440744,0.000361853,0.0019476181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095031474,0.00019891572,0.00015447779,0.0009212514,0.0007600355,0.00022948746,0.0005200382,0.00039194294,0.00015097023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018131156,0.00016148722,0.87050223,0.000038206672,0.00020102659,0.0002979116,0.0038955605,0.00018216886,0.114642076,0.00026143083,0.00012577548,0.007878943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038604157,0.000026255006,0.9992939,0.0000022211523,0.00000610377,0.00007979306,0.0003230177,0.00007760673,0.0001305829,0.000023249113,0.000030505405,0.0000028082093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044426564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015193821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044426564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029268724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011708535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008833587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390698684","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02761-1","title":"A framework to support the identification of critical habitat for wide-ranging species at risk under climate change","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Dalhousie University; Natural Resources Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Alberta","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Warbler; Geography; Critical habitat; Ecology; Climate change; Population; Range (aeronautics); Environmental resource management; Species distribution; Environmental science; Endangered species; Biology","score_opus":0.07109322196346135,"score_gpt":0.27877350445838556,"score_spread":0.2076802824949242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390698684","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047218218,0.000118350516,0.98777187,0.0012409163,0.000043089094,0.00034154614,0.00063116185,0.0010150962,0.004116094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.077874206,0.00011998979,0.91979384,0.0001718109,0.000047228626,0.00048346966,0.00081842986,0.00009226665,0.00059882744],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963672,0.0015948655,0.0004009692,0.0006116424,0.00072753365,0.0002977963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891816,0.0048690583,0.0011383957,0.0007835408,0.0033435202,0.0006839067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008764221,0.0013035883,0.0010093123,0.005805135,0.0019225852,0.0037127289,0.0037421621,0.001782685,0.0051795803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022193994,0.00082212704,0.0026501378,0.0025146275,0.002377747,0.003056577,0.004380575,0.0017669845,0.0008941111],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007884078,0.00025176158,0.011734495,0.00046751884,0.0002113576,0.000848987,0.0010457095,0.5298575,0.0020335536,0.35413855,0.015871238,0.08346039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004963171,0.00009016709,0.0015362129,0.00028987025,0.000055495155,0.00020812123,0.0005653581,0.83041114,0.00062384526,0.13719548,0.02890051,0.00007421385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05940985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062762685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05940985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046109115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00805011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11812812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395683807","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02851-8","title":"The importance of native shrubs on the distribution and diversity of reptiles and amphibians in the central drylands of Southwestern USA.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biodiversity; Ecology; Diversity (politics); Geography; Distribution (mathematics); Biology; Sociology","score_opus":0.016741355998291053,"score_gpt":0.20613636423170356,"score_spread":0.18939500823341252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395683807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989791,0.00027589375,0.00002127527,0.000051486037,0.0000028669206,0.0000017005134,0.00014107543,8.8960473e-7,0.0005258132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994803,0.00017263935,0.000043574822,0.00002807717,0.000006341142,0.0000020719467,0.00012703116,4.4475547e-7,0.00013951473],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984443,0.000062023035,0.000010218183,0.000020693646,0.000022806382,0.0000397997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929297,0.0001484065,0.0002654865,0.000032170206,0.00013794277,0.00012296048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003259721,0.00009037669,0.000075664895,0.0006120107,0.00031584254,0.00025964176,0.00017884916,0.00013590863,0.000920037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082874735,0.000072365496,0.000099430814,0.0004569514,0.00035567183,0.0002735732,0.00029082416,0.00019742055,0.00009491317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055816472,0.0000240898,0.9912498,0.000022243268,0.000039016304,0.00006505512,0.0003747162,0.000045042427,0.0005501113,0.000052011994,0.00026657112,0.0072555616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.9617815e-7,0.0000059518425,0.9994825,0.000005756375,0.0000052817572,0.000021528936,0.00028768939,0.00003793086,0.000015738307,0.000008823172,0.0001276452,4.9966513e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06293756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28715888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06293756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033207925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032312336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12514246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402700442","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02936-4","title":"Conserved lands unable to maintain butterfly communities in a biodiversity hotspot","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Butterfly; Biodiversity hotspot; Hotspot (geology); Ecology; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.019436239043342993,"score_gpt":0.20907859604751008,"score_spread":0.1896423570041671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402700442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999114,0.000014756716,0.0000511859,0.000015461217,0.0000010657268,0.0000035333564,0.000020067371,0.0000021878454,0.00077778863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996551,0.000008689025,0.00010581373,0.000011454549,9.3206245e-7,0.0000031690865,0.000029761402,0.0000012852248,0.00018378806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972564,0.00005339328,0.000012935872,0.00004361134,0.000034027573,0.0001302682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988519,0.00016187965,0.0003050586,0.00017480942,0.00014803547,0.00035832735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032845052,0.000107043525,0.00026390803,0.0006937717,0.0010210118,0.0009068634,0.00053519616,0.00028494332,0.0027575805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090697786,0.00012309395,0.00012993986,0.00056236994,0.001181431,0.0006448083,0.0008517031,0.0002759079,0.00019313692],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025324507,0.0009122338,0.7884738,0.00025977966,0.00029814715,0.0012540403,0.002247066,0.002348762,0.16201195,0.005447576,0.0008755013,0.033338804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027563074,0.00042847375,0.9891544,0.000021006228,0.000072623465,0.0004466862,0.0031554843,0.001010134,0.003010367,0.00087624975,0.0017878767,0.000009251123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059295343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025259508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059295343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011338147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008395344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011790037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402812419","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02938-2","title":"Rapid evaluation of habitat connectivity change to safeguard multispecies persistence in human-transformed landscapes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Cégep de Saint-Laurent","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Liber Ero Foundation; Mitacs; McGill University","keywords":"Safeguard; Biodiversity; Persistence (discontinuity); Habitat; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geography; Environmental science; Biology; Business","score_opus":0.08448548618701776,"score_gpt":0.2683998948886232,"score_spread":0.18391440870160544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402812419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92746496,0.0012391591,0.032892115,0.0005616762,0.000037932765,0.00023270921,0.022703439,0.00055673736,0.014311323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839077,0.00018837494,0.011747727,0.000034295317,0.0000039821966,0.00006877159,0.0032184673,0.000024230729,0.00080654287],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995297,0.00010680032,0.000032503365,0.00008928693,0.00016520242,0.00007650069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970751,0.00040245397,0.0006974057,0.00012743165,0.001511724,0.0001859643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013601285,0.00027867797,0.00020533516,0.0037160076,0.00043744472,0.0013969371,0.0006279959,0.00020742672,0.002263792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045776432,0.000082328974,0.00031641847,0.0050285757,0.00032742383,0.00087617495,0.00079520803,0.0002569851,0.0001758324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011090681,0.000045268924,0.8649311,0.00041479326,0.00027035445,0.00027468632,0.0008040923,0.034995537,0.002751088,0.0023530226,0.0060985954,0.08695054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007829734,0.00006668699,0.94404536,0.00011678444,0.00007196102,0.000066555665,0.001651462,0.0444616,0.001106779,0.0010138772,0.007352894,0.000038170383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5500418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7711123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5500418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004782307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002366726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9052162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403551450","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02953-3","title":"Study extent influences the predictions and performance of species distribution models: a case study of six amphibian species at the edge of their geographic distributions in western Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Lethbridge","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Amphibian; Biodiversity; Ecology; Distribution (mathematics); Geography; Species distribution; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Biology; Habitat; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0473117025638754,"score_gpt":0.2157344873111216,"score_spread":0.1684227847472462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403551450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99867743,0.000041574523,0.00034371446,0.00007456628,0.0000014642328,0.000005894846,0.00007207265,0.00001595692,0.0007674066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99909437,0.0000352949,0.00052323437,0.000011089998,7.536633e-7,0.0000023521013,0.00008427076,0.0000078262565,0.00024085163],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995964,0.00016185948,0.000016033366,0.00006852869,0.000053383836,0.00010368227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974362,0.0016378454,0.00015958282,0.000095087824,0.00046587706,0.0002054471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015535302,0.0003673097,0.00032426824,0.00054986845,0.0016282558,0.0020622194,0.0010112652,0.0006165877,0.0011841829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006079804,0.00029632472,0.00044602956,0.0008333165,0.0011557351,0.0008588474,0.00085427356,0.0005498811,0.00010825036],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003344346,0.00016780765,0.6393422,0.00004481723,0.00018278082,0.000308028,0.0014204641,0.34342206,0.0011080187,0.0013122532,0.00073726516,0.011619984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056528785,0.0000797119,0.3450267,0.000033785764,0.00011265026,0.000091002854,0.0050726086,0.6456327,0.0009815131,0.0012153136,0.0016424543,0.000055061744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9547001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97357166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045299888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010316666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064103478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0911333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403632263","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02958-y","title":"Mountains host significantly more data deficient and threatened bat species than lowlands","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Future Earth","funders":"Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Threatened species; Biodiversity; Ecology; Geography; Host (biology); Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.06786261739368027,"score_gpt":0.22130776793824425,"score_spread":0.15344515054456398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403632263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99035233,0.0022311802,0.0010801322,0.00017835334,0.00001580995,0.00001149536,0.0036890968,0.00004868391,0.0023929216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955456,0.00050827925,0.001060651,0.000060360257,0.000015031821,0.000010510979,0.0025007217,0.000011832788,0.00028684794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993808,0.00019801159,0.00008510688,0.00016128086,0.000096365824,0.0000784562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752444,0.0008090892,0.0009859945,0.00021642844,0.00030135264,0.00016265642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007318203,0.00017588388,0.00030561804,0.0012486362,0.0005635993,0.0010692124,0.0002382819,0.0001592236,0.003890777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020865023,0.00011293245,0.0002840615,0.0016381479,0.0003027228,0.0007541954,0.00080541027,0.00028213277,0.00047943476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000871248,0.00001481385,0.97109795,0.00047954256,0.00032549127,0.00015405031,0.0013358231,0.00030554572,0.0030476025,0.00038866827,0.0009063685,0.021857172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040471828,0.000028744362,0.9882465,0.00015168617,0.00012510152,0.00040895882,0.0016651438,0.00036573503,0.0003893762,0.00033863468,0.008266085,0.000010050556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004027421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010489018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004027421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015110892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031476008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0130159855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405528339","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02978-8","title":"Anthropogenically protected but naturally disturbed: a specialist carnivore at its southern range periphery","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Colorado Parks and Wildlife","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Range (aeronautics); Urbanization; Carnivore; Ecoregion; Biodiversity; Population; Predation; Biology","score_opus":0.013527926286242267,"score_gpt":0.1984573713280309,"score_spread":0.18492944504178863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405528339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997465,0.000009405609,0.00005562771,0.000012170055,3.4991092e-7,7.238557e-7,0.00003250471,0.0000015488035,0.0001412083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997904,0.000005911791,0.000079350255,0.0000075862145,6.636648e-7,0.000001068354,0.000049121485,6.308731e-7,0.00006516278],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992645,0.000010931816,0.0000019991992,0.000033365748,0.0000067732794,0.000020401207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998273,0.00002345734,0.00004309415,0.000012509436,0.000018173629,0.00007546904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023500896,0.00011795542,0.00016953873,0.00024455367,0.0008176593,0.0004782038,0.0003641605,0.00019378161,0.00095428695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027189136,0.000096079595,0.0001323493,0.0001768795,0.00036257625,0.00023315253,0.00040922285,0.00014689166,0.000057948077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088508474,0.000026972946,0.99226576,0.000008300969,0.000030338442,0.0003495257,0.00062139565,0.0019213726,0.002510966,0.00015392448,0.00025094254,0.0017720958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068443032,0.00008116801,0.9871767,0.000013099877,0.000021196143,0.0004387378,0.0020685191,0.009224386,0.00020658835,0.0001666937,0.00058844726,0.000007736943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09568944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.299778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09568944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074055645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044652514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19026494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406609084","doi":"10.1007/s10531-025-03012-1","title":"Local weather interacts with human disturbances to shape the behaviour of boreal caribou across a large climate gradient","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Boreal; Biodiversity; Ecology; Climate change; Climatology; Environmental science; Taiga; Geography; Disturbance (geology); Physical geography; Biology; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.014480742729234186,"score_gpt":0.24092221380189707,"score_spread":0.22644147107266288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406609084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99919146,0.0001166196,0.00008882398,0.000065905784,0.0000071630957,0.0000012185782,0.000031196152,0.0000025739257,0.0004950782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99964285,0.000072543095,0.000061301886,0.000022949716,0.0000046562127,0.0000018995788,0.000032566317,0.0000027249787,0.00015847785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998274,0.00008375447,0.0000061110018,0.000032221902,0.000016267417,0.000034328474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995296,0.00013048286,0.0001394906,0.000037141075,0.00004345782,0.00011974066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030954598,0.000102378704,0.00016695926,0.00028210992,0.0003518221,0.0007767588,0.0001928081,0.00030477074,0.0011800224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011186359,0.0001134461,0.00020750823,0.00038995632,0.00051252847,0.00027197978,0.00037301533,0.00026733062,0.00010011345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013297664,0.00007273065,0.98776346,0.000018566425,0.00014874723,0.00009928669,0.0015048132,0.00071365107,0.003525739,0.00011374974,0.00028354314,0.0056226635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.687374e-7,0.000019741923,0.998591,0.0000032576547,0.000009118596,0.000021839378,0.000901703,0.00020303405,0.000034129043,0.00003878859,0.00017353974,0.0000028955014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038062073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11657528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038062073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025375182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002633829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07568103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406857386","doi":"10.1007/s10531-025-03022-z","title":"Effect of forest loss and fragmentation per se on arboreal and ground mammals of the Lacandon rainforest, Mexico","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Rufford Foundation","keywords":"Arboreal locomotion; Rainforest; Biodiversity; Fragmentation (computing); Forest fragmentation; Ecology; Geography; Tropical rainforest; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.00658607937768684,"score_gpt":0.2080215854001451,"score_spread":0.20143550602245824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406857386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99968314,0.00007208746,0.000022524044,0.000009067902,5.8165966e-7,0.000001186657,0.00006067369,0.0000014747004,0.0001493647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996655,0.00005713145,0.00004833715,0.00000573994,0.0000025410104,0.000002622546,0.00013450762,7.791751e-7,0.00008296863],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99980456,0.00005284656,0.000008944176,0.000066879344,0.00002522009,0.00004148022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991627,0.00020532671,0.00037317947,0.00006360725,0.00006748999,0.00012767689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004076349,0.00020167435,0.00022807874,0.00056946074,0.0003045465,0.00047585793,0.00024099737,0.00017978922,0.0013749812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078152877,0.00006570837,0.00022339336,0.0003773261,0.00039131404,0.00019729129,0.00040696224,0.00021334416,0.00006492228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018108787,0.000028129902,0.9955928,0.0000127028015,0.000088287255,0.00006791682,0.00013479027,0.00015098286,0.001254489,0.000024092007,0.00005832015,0.002406348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012105528,0.000021936516,0.9996892,0.0000015442386,0.000008475803,0.000017537921,0.000093039365,0.00008515736,0.000022229202,0.000007022936,0.00005212827,5.054103e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017287526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040830486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017287526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038108806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013218257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03437382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409205139","doi":"10.1007/s10531-025-03068-z","title":"The applicability of regional red list assessments for soil invertebrates: first assessment of five native earthworm species in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Emmanuel Bible College; University of Alberta; Saint Mary's University","funders":"Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Earthworm; Invertebrate; Biodiversity; Ecology; Lumbricidae; Biology; Geography; Environmental science; Agroforestry","score_opus":0.03141244171594327,"score_gpt":0.22137049178827545,"score_spread":0.18995805007233219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409205139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934558,0.00035036533,0.0005337336,0.00010284163,0.000005477137,0.000185249,0.0014218536,0.000017557337,0.0039271438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941062,0.00036037643,0.0025074435,0.00008562172,0.0000020439866,0.00006157387,0.0014766381,0.000006482131,0.0013936806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985378,0.00014046737,0.0000775554,0.00014854631,0.0008114249,0.00028408927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934041,0.00030904464,0.0004948825,0.00013474906,0.004918177,0.00073906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017548157,0.00041390242,0.00027297006,0.0023999722,0.0021165663,0.00108196,0.00086739194,0.00034680712,0.0007521427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034222454,0.00021429929,0.00041840403,0.0022083814,0.00061778916,0.00033614988,0.0009122546,0.00044463863,0.00011679442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016650198,0.00010447617,0.9702636,0.000091996124,0.0000841406,0.00018355751,0.0015608692,0.0011558582,0.002144543,0.00021198647,0.0008195511,0.023212863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008287561,0.00013224584,0.99353725,0.00004488604,0.00004126405,0.00005121636,0.0022187738,0.0016197893,0.00056960795,0.000034874167,0.0017261085,0.000015652959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9882036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99643743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020179186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020179186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024968863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14641088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411061409","doi":"10.1007/s10531-025-03099-6","title":"Out of sight and out of mind? The conservation status of subterranean biodiversity in the United States and Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Directorate for Biological Sciences","keywords":"Biodiversity; Conservation status; Biodiversity conservation; Geography; Sight; Ecology; Biology; Physics; Habitat","score_opus":0.04585288695645411,"score_gpt":0.19014306947301518,"score_spread":0.14429018251656106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411061409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92896736,0.0053115194,0.0002300387,0.01128608,0.00009998998,0.000019940977,0.0016314015,0.000019186105,0.05243442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99344975,0.0022514977,0.00020526588,0.00049798406,0.000011719765,0.0000044137882,0.00027091432,0.0000066268663,0.0033017986],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907047,0.00006640217,0.000027365963,0.000077131,0.00030462994,0.00045394053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953241,0.00034274743,0.0004493729,0.00010554626,0.0025577396,0.0012205451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095390616,0.0001091941,0.00023553701,0.0025588498,0.006055992,0.004043426,0.0009716738,0.00042907635,0.002983795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041767703,0.0001401539,0.00017887831,0.004426722,0.0029180509,0.0014646609,0.0014464566,0.00086818205,0.00011058333],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023525053,0.00005153526,0.745928,0.00029442614,0.000117209536,0.00055091485,0.04067813,0.0006462616,0.0010073223,0.029973218,0.028746,0.15177163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006415136,0.00001535564,0.8653781,0.00044731342,0.000058081107,0.00019545254,0.08444081,0.00062085374,0.0003055936,0.0020430672,0.0464367,0.000052402196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99685436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03316888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03316888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058039084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24065822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412027408","doi":"10.1007/s10531-025-03120-y","title":"AviList: a unified global bird checklist","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Checklist; Biodiversity; Geography; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science; Paleontology","score_opus":0.020889519325729775,"score_gpt":0.22502641188041117,"score_spread":0.2041368925546814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412027408","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041142352,0.0024287198,0.036712546,0.0020974546,0.0012109021,0.003109117,0.8536317,0.015129778,0.04453731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059690375,0.0015248068,0.08372976,0.0012516795,0.00033238225,0.0053907223,0.82556874,0.0036829538,0.018828604],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987092,0.0003386263,0.0002911068,0.00011872456,0.0003876794,0.00015475567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99249214,0.00097039633,0.0012129046,0.00078486936,0.0033422273,0.0011973508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031194286,0.0010412872,0.000551468,0.010821251,0.00052733714,0.0011787231,0.0012289744,0.0005407855,0.018953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008032675,0.00048801777,0.00042280141,0.0057525835,0.00028503136,0.0018901287,0.002297573,0.00076768437,0.007530701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032972923,0.000086885375,0.06485821,0.00085303246,0.00016747115,0.00009388137,0.00056835567,0.000744032,0.0022832577,0.0021458399,0.7380101,0.18985923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103289945,0.0001217543,0.20357354,0.0004942436,0.00012176753,0.00034339348,0.00046169068,0.0008496404,0.00067876204,0.0012137588,0.79196984,0.00006841773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014953961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018952942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006693323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030983887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06340408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414553738","doi":"10.1007/s10531-025-03138-2","title":"Not all protected areas are created equal: quality vs quantity in the quest to achieve 30 × 30","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Species richness; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Protected area; Global biodiversity; Climate change; Ecosystem services","score_opus":0.17618910759624726,"score_gpt":0.2540549926518895,"score_spread":0.07786588505564226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414553738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6966436,0.003909512,0.045387726,0.019511705,0.00033526315,0.0004155552,0.0009131144,0.00016198774,0.23272151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944534,0.0002247715,0.0036328698,0.00030177538,0.000034873847,0.00005077305,0.00008490505,0.000023040911,0.001193695],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98889786,0.005026769,0.00045319204,0.00076841953,0.0039989026,0.0008549133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97254723,0.008571827,0.0058575873,0.0043811724,0.004721344,0.0039209295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011915841,0.00024131354,0.00034492504,0.0020916418,0.0016511707,0.005247173,0.0009463915,0.00052719365,0.007644749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044750184,0.000232503,0.00035165326,0.0026599942,0.0058406526,0.0061122077,0.0049867416,0.001339658,0.0004138675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037527597,0.0002009503,0.36256412,0.0005520963,0.0003860444,0.00030161435,0.008726534,0.011180326,0.0022953937,0.24375144,0.015316291,0.35435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000754237,0.00073012814,0.65605354,0.0014552828,0.0001471764,0.0007931819,0.018365165,0.011860479,0.00092388137,0.18135487,0.12814456,0.00009639921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014342247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035049193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014342247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003572379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031959948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063017786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415461287","doi":"10.1007/s10531-025-03191-x","title":"Valuing species-at-risk recovery: A discrete choice experiment on public willingness-to-pay for conservation in Québec, Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Wildlife; Woodland; Population; Contingent valuation; Wildlife trade; Biodiversity; Status quo; Endangered species","score_opus":0.073247577350108,"score_gpt":0.203997077197591,"score_spread":0.130749499847483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415461287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98931587,0.00013690746,0.000504215,0.0013006288,0.000026588956,0.0002369197,0.0005001647,0.00001861768,0.007960204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911281,0.00009926148,0.0006977304,0.00026178168,0.000008497733,0.00013871309,0.00029440038,0.000007314488,0.0073641133],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740404,0.0010348472,0.00006596336,0.000356609,0.00042115315,0.0007173149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883398,0.0062399935,0.0011048424,0.0006916997,0.0017550895,0.0018687072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049536093,0.0006557835,0.0010094537,0.0005178104,0.0047859414,0.0030498842,0.0022757992,0.0021955455,0.010561202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010218502,0.00037515396,0.000614058,0.0009904169,0.0029037832,0.0013854707,0.00081460684,0.002150015,0.0005997899],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.048813503,0.05601969,0.49870434,0.0008411314,0.0016707368,0.0015207938,0.020624029,0.09049513,0.01576641,0.05762076,0.072422504,0.13550091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00986206,0.007426205,0.79240066,0.00038114673,0.0006455661,0.000091221875,0.02539012,0.12405245,0.00298297,0.008700257,0.027450169,0.0006171454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99349385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084143005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.084143005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05450663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6105031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W628580956","doi":"10.1007/s10531-015-0944-2","title":"Application of a non-invasive indexing method for introduced Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) in the Aleutian Islands, Alaska","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Biology; Transect; Population; Zoology; Ecology; Invasive species; Introduced species; Demography","score_opus":0.03319609110534861,"score_gpt":0.262854968222668,"score_spread":0.22965887711731942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W628580956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931718,0.00017229536,0.005326204,0.000015344103,0.000024854047,0.00005089157,0.0001252645,0.000028875444,0.001084381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745891,0.00025164275,0.023661166,0.0000136676435,0.00001421892,0.000055999677,0.0001846639,0.000010123027,0.0012194532],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938476,0.0001372196,0.000055624656,0.00018783225,0.00018649499,0.00004804914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986148,0.00028063785,0.00029625243,0.00008777397,0.000594755,0.00012578367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011882014,0.0003078041,0.00029671256,0.0015652522,0.00081428984,0.00059416384,0.0004995703,0.00028397323,0.00040235918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014977198,0.00016515628,0.00021698055,0.00057080976,0.0004157626,0.00042807907,0.0005798864,0.00023915201,0.00012935979],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011687519,0.00044024267,0.6129473,0.00027913201,0.00012737824,0.00036123965,0.003170337,0.0017054108,0.23953128,0.00030043407,0.00024129762,0.13972726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003677332,0.0010493146,0.9501343,0.000040657407,0.0002875668,0.000535188,0.003023648,0.008959328,0.03382076,0.00020379951,0.0018424091,0.000066365734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04582585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11753306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04582585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067053066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010667056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09111822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7083701685","doi":"10.1007/s10531-025-03149-z","title":"Determining factors of endemic parrots’ large-scale occupancy: a study on climate and forest structure in the Amazon’s most at-risk region","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Universidade Estadual do Maranhão","keywords":"Occupancy; Deforestation (computer science); Threatened species; Endemism; Biodiversity; Habitat; Habitat destruction; Population","score_opus":0.01851838973988916,"score_gpt":0.22315925265366587,"score_spread":0.2046408629137767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7083701685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99981326,0.000012984655,0.000022999711,0.0000100524985,4.389804e-7,0.0000011346158,0.0000198893,3.169326e-7,0.00011900723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99988925,0.0000098775145,0.00002562477,0.0000041905873,8.443864e-7,0.0000013617955,0.000022606018,4.7131294e-7,0.0000457738],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997596,0.00007665984,0.000013960674,0.000054481672,0.000021283122,0.00007391228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917835,0.00015758575,0.00032393908,0.000045534132,0.00005751499,0.00023699822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002833204,0.000124825,0.00018048742,0.00037015346,0.0006143516,0.00046004247,0.00028393048,0.00020165936,0.0016221204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007928605,0.00018334333,0.00021353584,0.0005937356,0.0005629178,0.0005077481,0.0005141319,0.00029787238,0.00012112826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030632822,0.000054187087,0.99675024,0.000004398781,0.000020418334,0.00006088201,0.0014150506,0.000029129136,0.00047663384,0.000041554846,0.000037723486,0.0010792068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.975175e-7,0.00002196235,0.99781203,0.0000017908701,0.0000038985518,0.00006521339,0.0018985735,0.00008973205,0.000018318182,0.000012410362,0.00007388777,0.0000014205466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02499742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09509443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02499742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031703812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003112992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049703836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W746209869","doi":"10.1007/s10531-015-0960-2","title":"Grazing increases functional richness but not functional divergence in Tibetan alpine meadow plant communities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Key Research and Development Program of China; Peking University; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Grazing; Biology; Species richness; Specific leaf area; Competition (biology); Agronomy; Species evenness; Plant community; Ecosystem; Ecology; Botany","score_opus":0.058062720859942595,"score_gpt":0.2017618041595863,"score_spread":0.1436990832996437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W746209869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999826,0.000033585282,0.000023894585,0.0000073158617,6.734756e-7,3.1859219e-7,0.000010020743,0.0000010759175,0.000097074415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998338,0.00001204576,0.00003090583,0.000009434343,0.000001957338,7.2490616e-7,0.000026361518,9.379096e-7,0.00008387154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997892,0.0000853725,0.00001039226,0.000047544556,0.000020075457,0.000047505484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986665,0.00044598256,0.00030434274,0.00008611366,0.00008410447,0.00041300745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005653606,0.00019255732,0.00023740089,0.00065724173,0.0006088559,0.0006603244,0.0002875493,0.00031566885,0.001763777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001428534,0.00018340681,0.00023497759,0.00045442054,0.0005598526,0.0004226384,0.000503534,0.00026778187,0.000084493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007807614,0.00009082758,0.96626484,0.000051748248,0.00028090435,0.00016184417,0.00068148045,0.0003152629,0.025100738,0.00013304412,0.000078200435,0.006060421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036668628,0.000033278688,0.99928814,0.0000018764903,0.000013144082,0.000034734596,0.000183868,0.00027690522,0.00007577434,0.000057689253,0.000029538387,0.0000014541174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0093427515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026831895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0093427515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033160122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019314575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018576741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W87356681","doi":"10.1023/a:1016660123189","title":"Species diversity of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in Iwokrama Forest, Guyana, and the Guianan subregion: implications for conservation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":171,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Species richness; Ecology; Geography; Taxonomy (biology); Species diversity; Biology","score_opus":0.05591637975261185,"score_gpt":0.20723554874702407,"score_spread":0.15131916899441222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W87356681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99898833,0.0002838496,0.000038376525,0.000042275744,9.968401e-7,0.0000034005504,0.00017807395,0.0000039059,0.00046076128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952245,0.000090715344,0.00007469873,0.000012509533,8.4631915e-7,0.0000050270323,0.000156302,8.777427e-7,0.00013656144],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999843,0.00004899606,0.000011074551,0.00003386848,0.000014187685,0.00004878294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996718,0.00010954019,0.000100335455,0.000019354215,0.000042170574,0.000056791967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017487552,0.00020860942,0.00017289899,0.0019230976,0.00042661515,0.00056294166,0.00029144395,0.0003787899,0.0018723506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032836382,0.00021084708,0.00021099107,0.0013340819,0.0006636986,0.00030982585,0.0005528232,0.00019984628,0.00021275869],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023821775,0.000026095657,0.97737545,0.00011833608,0.00009688791,0.0006836127,0.004764966,0.00019926326,0.009212421,0.00039533354,0.00020490953,0.0066845287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026416085,0.000013402216,0.9982634,0.0000075623725,0.000010205255,0.00022699367,0.0011507748,0.00009370359,0.00006195273,0.000022910554,0.0001424855,0.0000039269116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06412231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1660292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06412231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088135083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024867876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12749815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W97453941","doi":"10.1023/a:1016038501986","title":"Robustness of ecological niche modeling algorithms for mammals in Guyana","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Sampling (signal processing); Geography; Ecology; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.11675261212084043,"score_gpt":0.23903969542074804,"score_spread":0.12228708329990762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W97453941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93141866,0.0007835327,0.06441756,0.0010203256,0.000045876615,0.00003042351,0.00024100406,0.00066173146,0.0013807961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890647,0.00009241083,0.010101363,0.00007423755,0.000012986317,0.000017939687,0.0002488415,0.000091280046,0.00029619562],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981048,0.0012224318,0.00010870256,0.00029394036,0.00011167181,0.00015830858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96942097,0.026917502,0.0011069318,0.001273505,0.00082554144,0.00045540452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008965871,0.0007828313,0.0008516577,0.0012730537,0.0010326515,0.0019326095,0.0014557741,0.0014411254,0.00078325404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029304933,0.0005231854,0.0008206931,0.00063710957,0.0010436892,0.0014428728,0.0016803162,0.0012140244,0.00015995507],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043124205,0.000036683057,0.013542639,0.00003197543,0.00012426902,0.00003077972,0.000092168266,0.976041,0.0004612212,0.0017851138,0.00033056195,0.0070923176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020713649,0.00003128503,0.0025065967,0.000011388993,0.000019706866,0.000017686478,0.000028722394,0.9953198,0.00025395272,0.001706186,0.000077910285,0.0000060250436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043282546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021519614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043282546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002467247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014906696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08606124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}