{"meta":{"query_hash":"cd627caa7d08","filters":{"venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation"},"cohort_total":201,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":201,"exported":201,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/cd627caa7d08","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Biodiversity+and+Conservation"},"results":[{"id":"W122935925","doi":"10.1023/a:1020812316749","title":"Biodiversity conservation and cash crop development in northern Thailand","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Cash; Cash crop; Cropping; Biodiversity; Livelihood; Business; Clearing; Agroforestry; Natural resource economics; Geography; Agricultural economics; Agriculture; Economics; Ecology; Finance; Biology","score_opus":0.06557891647434028,"score_gpt":0.20908095757764544,"score_spread":0.14350204110330517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W122935925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98913586,0.000713503,0.000010646282,0.007583397,0.00008413744,0.00014058026,0.000011587471,0.000030197998,0.0022900645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697983,0.0011409189,0.00011574314,0.0011617435,0.000021993941,0.0000019918384,0.000012475489,9.300564e-7,0.00056436507],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993914,0.00006894088,0.00009069012,0.0001556518,0.00015056028,0.0001427821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972224,0.000055484616,0.000051269155,0.000035487315,0.00007851243,0.00005702216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021947303,0.000071234834,0.000099661,0.000056256322,0.0010292566,0.00005853146,0.00005301663,0.00008397555,0.0000498964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006558702,0.00007939385,0.000013503447,0.0001623044,0.00031684912,0.00021676497,0.00005367713,0.00005637228,0.000039489212],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008502107,0.00002473266,0.9623378,0.000007509863,0.000010040103,0.0000043093755,0.02441486,1.5568581e-7,0.0000042376582,0.0005124162,0.010003604,0.0026718653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045243136,0.000012634714,0.79363513,0.000008660173,0.000010059261,2.7008173e-7,0.0052473685,0.00002510951,0.00000845494,0.00010716111,0.20036788,0.00012482189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030169157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22175781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19158866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012372581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030907642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97628903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W141507795","doi":"10.1023/a:1016831916994","title":"Tree species diversity in small, tropical riparian forest fragments in Belize, Central America","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; York University; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Thicket; Biodiversity; Rainforest; Ecology; Hectare; Riparian forest; Biology; Ridge; Tree (set theory); Geography; Agroforestry; Forestry; Riparian zone; Habitat; Agriculture","score_opus":0.032372462073856356,"score_gpt":0.18398961595045565,"score_spread":0.1516171538765993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W141507795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99416995,0.000019629311,0.00006601902,0.003497573,0.000046034114,0.00009083234,0.000008524247,0.000009242697,0.0020921773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857545,0.0001915717,0.0002693127,0.00070866564,0.0000039494917,0.000001425564,0.000008535559,6.5175226e-7,0.00024042279],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995089,0.00003911311,0.000083497085,0.00015580733,0.00006239139,0.00015026097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998343,0.000033690754,0.00003570943,0.00005950453,0.0000037760185,0.000033001408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000029347731,0.00006234036,0.00008662627,0.000038530114,0.0002551961,0.000008960441,0.00009810216,0.000055392302,0.00039885528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030391955,0.000067667075,0.000016191007,0.00014024126,0.00021038097,0.00015400036,0.00035341593,0.00007325393,0.00008601198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021304631,0.00008448071,0.99635506,0.0000025458314,0.0000042539095,0.0000088392335,0.0011979314,0.0000516622,0.000011303716,0.00013337085,0.0015999135,0.0005293232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006263042,0.000030791027,0.99384964,0.0000030319757,0.0000061983883,3.911923e-7,0.00040156365,0.0037289013,0.0000020425775,0.00029264647,0.0009859845,0.00007253322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018920187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04872022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0468282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008413777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000015916459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9686382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483478770","doi":"10.1023/a:1008943116150","title":"Farmland habitat selection of wintering lesser kestrels in a Spanish pseudosteppe: implications for conservation strategies","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Kestrel; Threatened species; Overwintering; Habitat; Ecology; Population; Geography; Forage; Agriculture; Agroforestry; Foraging; Biology; Predation","score_opus":0.01861530880954012,"score_gpt":0.21954035585047732,"score_spread":0.2009250470409372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483478770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931592,0.000009857832,0.00057648704,0.005335664,0.000027724915,0.00032554663,0.000033774166,0.000024779754,0.00050700374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982824,0.000042787306,0.0007233314,0.00073300913,0.000007715646,0.000025555302,0.00006228653,0.0000025541356,0.000120396675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999375,0.000039546452,0.00019658465,0.00020642618,0.000057156718,0.00012527515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996867,0.00008837912,0.000093296636,0.000074584976,0.000029657816,0.000027363974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016665447,0.00008666219,0.00011164792,0.000044980403,0.00018845587,0.000026716198,0.00007054127,0.0000983961,0.00023429733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022915963,0.00009949532,0.000027358576,0.00021051987,0.00013628099,0.0005482606,0.000023970904,0.00005407267,0.000019711426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120708595,0.000046784917,0.9911876,0.000017659408,0.0000073554675,1.3154572e-7,0.0002128485,0.0001341276,0.0027218857,0.00039235025,0.0026196956,0.0025389018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005898312,0.00008082194,0.9942108,0.000013603171,0.00001912926,0.000003695697,0.000256022,0.0011950058,0.0002668713,0.0012794773,0.0019839117,0.00010085623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014447687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005920871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051232018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000535535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000275695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40573016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498024763","doi":"10.1023/a:1013143503902","title":"Functional diversity and community structure of microorganisms in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere Canadian arctic soils","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhizosphere; Species evenness; Soil water; Biology; Diversity index; Bulk soil; Botany; Microorganism; Soil test; Ecology; Species diversity; Species richness; Bacteria","score_opus":0.019513997610790496,"score_gpt":0.16769339790940843,"score_spread":0.14817940029861792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498024763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99876535,0.000082089435,4.866841e-7,0.0009065605,0.000026147729,0.00007395759,0.00010036367,0.0000067279284,0.000038317747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993686,0.00008696751,0.000024836701,0.0004278579,0.00000781821,1.5686403e-7,0.000066396184,2.1982478e-7,0.000017160466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959594,0.000060418708,0.00006781122,0.000107683976,0.00006530569,0.00010281393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997173,0.00007079531,0.000039037084,0.000027378363,0.000058810783,0.00008670264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000090169626,0.000072252304,0.000095065785,0.000011356797,0.0007631736,0.000018227445,0.000055955392,0.00009840118,0.000096096126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001863394,0.0000431829,0.000014127911,0.00014075755,0.00011357923,0.00010342084,0.00015723941,0.00013021482,9.355424e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043276774,0.000015056504,0.99058634,0.000010405657,0.000007156745,0.0000022932556,0.0003769447,4.523349e-7,0.007395546,0.000031821968,0.000073969764,0.0014567646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002602056,0.0000611622,0.9968237,0.000009256056,0.000013657174,0.000009290445,0.0019524444,0.000116898744,0.00019255833,0.00040059214,0.000078963654,0.0000812151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52847254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77417713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24570462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003390756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013086792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58697915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502047965","doi":"10.1023/a:1014098917535","title":"Biodiversity links above and below the marine sediment–water interface that may influence community stability","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Marine Biology and Ecology Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Detritivore; Ecology; Benthic zone; Disturbance (geology); Habitat; Environmental science; Biology; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.055313819098042526,"score_gpt":0.21407924145371257,"score_spread":0.15876542235567004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502047965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879933,0.00008110873,0.0000017975686,0.011083632,0.000065349224,0.00015906553,0.00008247986,0.000022097576,0.00051115185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978776,0.00022690847,0.000018157712,0.0016218572,0.00000649232,3.7466523e-7,0.000102604965,3.0749385e-7,0.00014572543],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910957,0.00034560464,0.00008071312,0.00017130305,0.00009259043,0.00020024163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942344,0.00025333953,0.000036190308,0.00016319439,0.00005144961,0.000072386545],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006657781,0.00009561735,0.00010423464,0.00003473742,0.0012801536,0.00005233239,0.00019257222,0.00016742105,0.003503808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042190408,0.00006342336,0.00001957826,0.00006502731,0.00065942126,0.00026574518,0.00023951402,0.00044885193,0.0002476627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008021754,0.000020054988,0.9953195,0.000016746128,0.000020692305,0.0000020372709,0.0009454742,0.0000021676392,0.000016778751,0.0000027364829,0.0015078628,0.0020657599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002776798,0.00010888187,0.99349016,0.0000018773497,0.000017104092,0.000006306686,0.00068984105,0.00040751026,0.00034568898,0.00009012217,0.00447818,0.00008664614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017279278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0098065585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009884254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006454019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006674878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99740714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530313662","doi":"10.1023/a:1020312108530","title":"Phylogenetic diversity and ecological features in the Egyptian flora","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rare species; Liana; Biology; Taxon; Genus; Ecology; Endemism; Flora (microbiology); Habitat; Zoology; Botany","score_opus":0.0751688981588339,"score_gpt":0.1738512878842392,"score_spread":0.0986823897254053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530313662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897585,0.00031804232,4.7937768e-8,0.0096092755,0.000008620928,0.000058967187,0.000021141124,0.000008716648,0.00021666991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979114,0.0004715214,0.0000058100723,0.0015584425,0.000017174918,5.917869e-7,0.000004905507,3.388524e-8,0.00003011288],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996989,0.00003586386,0.000032329503,0.00009975347,0.000057592606,0.00007558912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99987334,0.00007806173,0.000015714802,0.000006904036,0.000009222916,0.000016745953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007164932,0.000045562065,0.000051764982,0.0000045722954,0.0007799178,0.00002341403,0.00006594624,0.000040201125,0.00004218374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010858415,0.000016291504,0.000012218162,0.00007555005,0.00007182259,0.000044816832,0.00016775783,0.000043806544,0.0000072277676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010303216,0.000026151407,0.992194,0.0000015368712,0.0000025817324,0.000005704795,0.0004797501,3.4001904e-8,0.0010485724,0.00005009389,0.0030654962,0.003115783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007919831,0.00006696472,0.9946496,0.0000017190192,0.000006184169,0.0000038231788,0.00067136344,0.000015160241,0.000011481327,0.00007341383,0.0043739933,0.000047094938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003936988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008152888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000035549217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":2.3517315e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5998576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594797209","doi":"10.1023/a:1016282023542","title":"Tree and shrub diversity and abundance in fragmented littoral forest of southeastern Madagascar","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"African Botany and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Diameter at breast height; Species richness; Floristics; Forestry; Biodiversity; Understory; Biology; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Geography; Botany; Canopy","score_opus":0.03851734325127516,"score_gpt":0.17221256123836406,"score_spread":0.1336952179870889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594797209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99716383,0.00030869906,7.334948e-7,0.0023453382,0.000013940957,0.00006065855,0.000033316825,0.0000073278975,0.00006614978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995178,0.00021652912,0.000014857131,0.00018293818,0.000006076542,4.5652476e-7,0.0000032844282,7.9869224e-8,0.000057956517],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967706,0.000022650947,0.00006003929,0.00011851843,0.000045181376,0.000076577555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998507,0.000050637285,0.000040569004,0.000013477882,0.000018477424,0.000026137897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000060308008,0.000050765055,0.000092814575,0.000008780685,0.0003603543,0.0000068785694,0.0000356397,0.000059986363,0.000025658943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010058876,0.000026973308,0.000010820102,0.00007016691,0.00017448796,0.00009967779,0.00022053726,0.000038492,0.0000014555311],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027534019,0.000022048303,0.9965253,0.000005632837,0.0000063348043,0.000001492661,0.00086911494,4.844584e-8,0.00031528465,0.000026572669,0.00013698378,0.0020636392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021673912,0.00008815187,0.99685204,0.000006575771,0.000009720891,0.0000010060727,0.0021508231,0.0002061588,0.000009370448,0.00008503573,0.00032321695,0.000051134688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010859477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008185758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070998105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000030340466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":4.810886e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45678452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597727458","doi":"10.1023/a:1011871723686","title":"Area prioritization for biodiversity conservation in Québec on the basis of species distributions: a preliminary analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; University of Texas at Austin; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Biodiversity; Geography; Riparian zone; Endangered species; Wetland; Logging; Population; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Ecology; Forestry; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.026813786160588823,"score_gpt":0.20466653977244625,"score_spread":0.17785275361185743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597727458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778191,0.000019371775,0.003643507,0.017898086,0.000019820367,0.00025527837,0.00014720269,0.00001009184,0.00018754855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881524,0.00012380283,0.00010398632,0.000686819,0.000002153998,0.000009540883,0.00015227818,5.352869e-7,0.000105628824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994957,0.00006181891,0.00012527528,0.00015061712,0.00008505561,0.00008151889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993816,0.0003733959,0.000108690634,0.00008016562,0.00004062336,0.000015496302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025053587,0.00006498717,0.00010565677,0.00007208729,0.00044830545,0.000009642583,0.000067984176,0.000053536594,0.0001318392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017532054,0.000057360754,0.000046724912,0.00047782907,0.00025401154,0.00014051385,0.000056616474,0.000045065055,0.000011167753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014423717,0.000063423286,0.9950525,0.000005516078,0.000046973364,5.264158e-7,0.0004430431,0.00023478501,0.000050049635,0.0008345993,0.00301727,0.000107080086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002790334,0.00007600118,0.991423,0.0000045536776,0.00013264321,3.0105332e-7,0.00077647116,0.005597535,0.0000909307,0.00029712936,0.0012602841,0.00006208991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055549084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0341446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028589692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009972182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013621364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98347974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1795001645","doi":"10.1023/a:1008939425511","title":"The crisis in shifting cultivation practices and the promise of agroforestry: a review of the Panamanian experience","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Deforestation (computer science); Agroforestry; Biodiversity; Agriculture; Geography; Panama; Productivity; Land use; Environmental protection; Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Ecology; Economics; Biology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.014749820404923947,"score_gpt":0.21232178447672814,"score_spread":0.1975719640718042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1795001645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97573066,0.0005638509,0.0000016626017,0.022915907,0.000013165232,0.00036087635,0.0000039934375,0.0000032738503,0.00040663918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917672,0.006637317,0.000033301345,0.0014233075,0.0000031662835,0.0000050265685,0.000002051382,7.0808204e-7,0.00012792087],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993484,0.00014234737,0.00014785351,0.00011716069,0.00017668489,0.0000675395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994453,0.000116219206,0.00027367508,0.00013531654,0.000016368895,0.000013089168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055581925,0.000053153948,0.0000769167,0.00000991151,0.00042513886,0.0000204585,0.0001685474,0.000023070419,0.000075032505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014721126,0.000028532519,0.000024969282,0.00022303141,0.00049694796,0.00015492961,0.00015912348,0.00004739894,0.0000027270423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006504099,0.000015894144,0.99098873,0.000106826206,0.00000616089,1.6889219e-7,0.003741216,0.000002940641,0.0000266235,0.000043548673,0.00068422867,0.0043185987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035942235,0.000009160478,0.98254234,0.0001295364,0.000030563686,5.0455884e-7,0.0036034,0.00020836851,0.000051526946,0.000049690057,0.012976684,0.00003880889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005975366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0214926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018899746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000067986816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9033006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1834110906","doi":"10.1023/a:1013141609742","title":"Bryophyte and vascular plant species richness in boreo-nemoral moist forests and mires","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Bryophyte; Species richness; Vascular plant; Ecology; Biodiversity; Mire; Biology; Wetland; Plant species; Indicator species; Species diversity; Plant community; Botany; Peat; Habitat","score_opus":0.013337947669641559,"score_gpt":0.17805524034438938,"score_spread":0.16471729267474783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1834110906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983758,0.000078048135,0.000015925885,0.0010693952,0.000025455052,0.00007115609,0.000020088199,0.0000085751835,0.00033556667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897015,0.00054726703,0.00005952585,0.00029714138,0.000008464757,0.0000012474462,0.000030959683,8.476369e-7,0.00008437629],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996056,0.000019704697,0.00005856153,0.00015366996,0.000059943366,0.000102546765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998647,0.000021592246,0.000024344656,0.00004550112,0.000003048176,0.000040846146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008162543,0.000060948652,0.0000826784,0.000027359743,0.00013725409,0.000025355313,0.000034757253,0.000047378857,0.00005174279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007604626,0.00005658105,0.000008625497,0.000068008725,0.0001672839,0.00014423835,0.00009579303,0.0000356349,0.0000067139354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032614596,0.000014992744,0.997772,0.0000051816933,0.0000032309397,0.000016703008,0.00017675468,0.00000196969,0.000106225234,0.000045118002,0.0014676879,0.00035756707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005370785,0.00003617272,0.9866911,0.000004298152,0.000008394306,0.000010739298,0.00010804772,0.000396211,0.000018869954,0.000167721,0.011944142,0.00007718384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019104556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006693316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011080814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001824022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000026474133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37350276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971921685","doi":"10.1007/s10531-009-9751-y","title":"Determinants of the geographical extent of invasive plants in China: effects of biogeographical origin, life cycle and time since introduction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"La Cité Collégiale","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Perennial plant; Ecology; Habitat; Biodiversity; China; Distribution (mathematics); Geography; Biology; Invasive species; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.01258127444297663,"score_gpt":0.17646159011111281,"score_spread":0.16388031566813618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971921685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99800056,0.00019036903,5.5560417e-8,0.0016495599,0.000014446978,0.00009441103,0.000043239805,0.0000033512742,0.000004006686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994493,0.00046530642,0.0000052865453,0.00006102788,0.000012515836,3.071186e-7,0.0000048723896,6.432067e-8,0.0000012795698],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961805,0.000037385093,0.000106910324,0.00009871656,0.00007904672,0.000059897626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997627,0.00008510572,0.00009459648,0.000013192275,0.000025102707,0.000019260304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000783682,0.000049433085,0.00013235712,0.000017143335,0.0000746196,0.0000035841258,0.000048442536,0.000046187673,0.000002211753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055966015,0.000020680405,0.000028829574,0.00016896342,0.00015274655,0.000052276006,0.00003953665,0.000033487144,2.3617329e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008518329,0.00005691299,0.90972173,0.0000184806,0.000004528202,5.604959e-7,0.000049974908,1.1877141e-7,0.08792694,0.00005722111,0.00005245701,0.0020259074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015007703,0.00020685875,0.9914363,0.00004108626,0.000011519082,0.0000013999171,0.00004692564,0.000023205897,0.007830492,0.0001749881,0.000038721482,0.00003842575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006073525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005022032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081714585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000018267508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000030405158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09181393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976060975","doi":"10.1007/s10531-012-0353-8","title":"Increased openness around retained oaks increases species richness of saproxylic beetles","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Stiftelsen Skogssällskapet; Skogforsk; Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning","keywords":"Species richness; Quercus robur; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Ecology; Deciduous; Felling; Quercus petraea; Fauna; Species diversity","score_opus":0.0339266995980383,"score_gpt":0.19481791823354674,"score_spread":0.16089121863550845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976060975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976577,0.0002444832,7.4289886e-7,0.001423594,0.00008160066,0.00013099972,0.00019972405,0.000029017574,0.00023209564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99917394,0.00012114534,0.00003253871,0.00034348646,0.000053807664,0.0000013712753,0.00014559978,1.6231635e-7,0.0001279353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941003,0.000072371775,0.00010853978,0.00013425534,0.00010283034,0.00017196113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995201,0.00018431757,0.000103596816,0.000034003773,0.00009315856,0.00006478467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022113683,0.00009773285,0.00016472496,0.000018387054,0.00048308106,0.000018537197,0.000119656186,0.000096741285,0.00013779815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076419536,0.000047796282,0.000044504974,0.00018369958,0.00028232267,0.00029719732,0.00016711549,0.00004670523,0.000026906277],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110785215,0.00012166929,0.98974586,0.000015163595,0.00003079897,0.0000010774144,0.00015018074,4.871691e-8,0.0067163203,0.0005409367,0.0022777456,0.00028942563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020696578,0.00007444959,0.98869354,0.000007926359,0.000051020223,0.0000026733032,0.002835797,0.0000037183886,0.0013492649,0.00007343113,0.0065867184,0.00011448602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021129583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067611574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053670555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015166227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005531098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37155178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977548191","doi":"10.1007/s10531-007-9173-7","title":"Saproxylic beetles in artificially created high-stumps of spruce and birch within and outside hotspot areas","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Snag; Felling; Fauna; Ordination; Hotspot (geology); Biodiversity; Ecology; Geography; Forestry; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.022721668815537235,"score_gpt":0.1925206351519406,"score_spread":0.16979896633640335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977548191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99767953,0.00012786388,5.5296795e-7,0.001895727,0.000033904456,0.00012089458,0.000056333854,0.000015170441,0.00007004582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946254,0.00013783053,0.000060576527,0.00026339214,0.000009817719,4.0064057e-7,0.000026529671,1.4005407e-7,0.000038780257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948144,0.000030963693,0.00012531676,0.00017832582,0.00006811263,0.00011583577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967307,0.00013638799,0.00007722536,0.000019642732,0.000053698022,0.000039954608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003024678,0.00007773031,0.00013655509,0.000031220505,0.0002477712,0.000015277814,0.000046443452,0.00010297861,0.000016453005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044748766,0.000041244177,0.000013386004,0.00016115703,0.0002947655,0.00009895091,0.00009038811,0.00005748126,0.0000038714634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019269424,0.00003715366,0.98753726,0.00001163536,0.000012637738,0.0000075153657,0.0003700223,1.7917449e-7,0.009425709,0.00045019682,0.00014657012,0.00180841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002384476,0.00014809972,0.9958337,0.00001254198,0.000018822928,0.000002615912,0.0013930893,0.000009808002,0.0017293586,0.00029975586,0.00022894125,0.00008482727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050109862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01622284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011211854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009011332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004532594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9052726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980263100","doi":"10.1007/s10531-012-0272-8","title":"Responses of insect pollinators and understory plants to silviculture in northern hardwood forests","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Pollinator; Understory; Biology; Silviculture; Nectar; Pollination; Ecology; Canopy; Pollen","score_opus":0.07477268682274109,"score_gpt":0.19798388786422827,"score_spread":0.12321120104148718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980263100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981515,0.00035819862,1.2534461e-7,0.0012826967,0.000014756442,0.00006450851,0.00008880843,0.000007643212,0.000031783777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99968165,0.00008360421,0.000006854927,0.00018175154,0.000014172101,6.42905e-7,0.000010453105,9.002452e-8,0.000020791495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970675,0.00002495965,0.00005252417,0.00007300452,0.00005381385,0.000088939654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99984413,0.000065702894,0.000027285996,0.0000063464436,0.000015921054,0.00004059606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008366389,0.000048673668,0.000073622614,0.000012659435,0.0001056816,0.000006943377,0.000030496933,0.000041069656,0.000003993608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020577625,0.000022142978,0.000011005107,0.00007532856,0.000034652687,0.000092636605,0.000039867744,0.000026203694,0.0000035881872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011738868,0.000019971183,0.9864246,0.0000044119893,0.0000043043497,6.669868e-7,0.0005137368,4.6505576e-8,0.011542288,0.000029792123,0.00038222564,0.0009605593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091384616,0.00008394958,0.9954049,0.000011244605,0.0000039301,0.0000013509773,0.001328931,7.2874684e-7,0.0005623012,0.00002181057,0.0024335715,0.000055890738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008892492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03793488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03704563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008728492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000021227704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9796203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981117596","doi":"10.1007/s10531-014-0736-0","title":"Biodiversity and ecosystem services: lessons from nature to improve management of planted forests for REDD-plus","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Biodiversity; Deforestation (computer science); Agroforestry; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Forest ecology; Forest restoration; Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation; Forest management; Ecoforestry; Environmental resource management; Business; Ecology; Climate change; Carbon stock; Biology","score_opus":0.01085122874722753,"score_gpt":0.20889203019542527,"score_spread":0.19804080144819775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981117596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99577874,0.000013669786,0.00020296566,0.0023660555,0.00008054081,0.00039748228,0.0006333864,0.0000205291,0.000506609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976545,0.00003179132,0.00088509946,0.0010128333,0.000012272247,0.000004311817,0.00017492323,0.0000015402692,0.00022273828],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994267,0.000019302526,0.00008663882,0.00024055285,0.000108996275,0.00011781582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968505,0.000037457823,0.00007715881,0.00012542715,0.000011544908,0.00006335394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012373802,0.0000899117,0.00011022967,0.00003858347,0.00018681171,0.000027154056,0.00013303902,0.00008460919,0.000046782738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004197454,0.000090410904,0.000023881787,0.00009040184,0.000045313893,0.00015837376,0.0002961779,0.000037991,0.00007749995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048569974,0.00004503745,0.9512938,0.00052825717,0.00011014789,0.0000030633498,0.001175632,0.000044022014,0.0004575134,0.0020734482,0.038893096,0.0048902542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015722208,0.0001363095,0.89809585,0.00006683066,0.00014645318,4.2145956e-7,0.0004306963,0.0051762434,0.000336499,0.0004155537,0.093399845,0.00022305406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031179714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028458186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054506753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003883495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000020252817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47134608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984578406","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-3922-7","title":"Practical importance for conservation of insect diversity in China","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Ecology; Urbanization; Biology; Agriculture; Ecosystem services; Endangered species; Agroforestry; Ecosystem; Habitat; Geography","score_opus":0.04110547396357949,"score_gpt":0.2650635612110115,"score_spread":0.223958087247432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984578406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99658966,0.000033011464,0.0003217189,0.0027805825,0.00003403593,0.00015797991,0.000036267134,0.0000041921126,0.000042532043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978741,0.00005156805,0.0010897624,0.00075961946,0.000024380857,0.0000036522376,0.00013717152,0.0000011356592,0.00005862389],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962574,0.000022190883,0.000099594115,0.00013154866,0.0000382057,0.00008274554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997827,0.00001520463,0.00007254495,0.00006105631,0.00004924803,0.000019243365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016024284,0.000055032826,0.000076029544,0.00003094538,0.00014503437,0.0000039005595,0.00003987182,0.00011518638,0.000013076317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049622522,0.00005969041,0.00002907862,0.000043607735,0.00007362372,0.000016890865,0.0000717327,0.000039218496,0.0000013978349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030562017,0.000087901026,0.96287936,0.000014798266,0.0000082889155,7.587785e-7,0.00010038805,0.0000013060181,0.03197248,0.00027677263,0.004008304,0.0003439943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000956377,0.00017405115,0.9649022,0.000003916178,0.000023911309,0.0000038220655,0.000077982564,0.00013622912,0.030555157,0.00005982052,0.0030142248,0.00009226594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014522218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096554315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020228538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009276844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003273962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24341042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984707903","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-3219-x","title":"Habitat Assessment, Phytosociology and Conservation of the Tunbridge Filmy-fern Hymenophyllum tunbrigense (L) Sm. in its Isolated Locations in the Vosges Mountains","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Botany and Plant Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cegep de Saint Jerome","funders":"","keywords":"Fern; Habitat; Geography; Canopy; Forestry; Ecology; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.027295870851644453,"score_gpt":0.21636518115212813,"score_spread":0.18906931030048368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984707903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94828033,0.00022292353,0.000001485499,0.051009953,0.000035171794,0.00023232614,0.00013319058,0.000007550924,0.00007706742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970061,0.00029168566,0.000014588501,0.0025740452,0.00001563994,0.0000066275447,0.00005283361,2.0160455e-7,0.00003826351],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930245,0.0002126347,0.00015297077,0.00014706934,0.00006814618,0.000116757554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993856,0.00040896423,0.000099912024,0.000036041063,0.00005604663,0.000013413719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030467298,0.00007886992,0.000116174575,0.000015585716,0.00032812878,0.000016577847,0.0001096165,0.00009784729,0.000015194977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046079822,0.00003380674,0.00002000415,0.0002133318,0.00019003692,0.00014241372,0.00005743708,0.00011311728,0.0000033582473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029310115,0.0000577818,0.9895405,0.0000065993745,0.000009950094,7.8110753e-7,0.000583505,0.0000029013086,0.0073964563,0.0005315282,0.0011074862,0.00073315436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022987212,0.00006557674,0.9944271,0.000009779346,0.000013576857,0.0000031109416,0.0016001058,0.00057928,0.000102013095,0.00014619489,0.002757597,0.00006583238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011371385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034371473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048725784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021638467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013805887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9832487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985238201","doi":"10.1007/s10531-009-9734-z","title":"Marine biodiversity at the community level: zoogeography of sharks, skates, rays and chimaeras in the southwestern Atlantic","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Zoogeography; Biodiversity; Peninsula; Geography; Ecology; Distribution (mathematics); Canonical correspondence analysis; Biogeography; Fishery; Species richness; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02329374394087821,"score_gpt":0.1947108018934985,"score_spread":0.17141705795262027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985238201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948824,0.000022103997,0.000003972926,0.0045681233,0.000019176967,0.00012685113,0.00003726118,0.000006097876,0.0003340319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99715865,0.0000952858,0.00004019066,0.0025877294,0.0000026108503,5.008558e-7,0.0000821004,3.7615231e-7,0.000032536293],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994111,0.00022722932,0.00008230043,0.00010872105,0.00006659642,0.00010403766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996812,0.00009789667,0.000055858265,0.00013961755,0.000006810385,0.000018629706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040581866,0.000073923315,0.00008884639,0.00002664401,0.00048092564,0.000009614025,0.00017952087,0.000069088645,0.00017425617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014272557,0.000049134764,0.00002346866,0.00012438864,0.0005229876,0.000084051375,0.00036208468,0.00013213349,0.000038297785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086188506,0.000047043115,0.995814,0.000003800394,0.000006351896,0.0000016289627,0.0014088862,7.704596e-7,0.0002710714,0.000035937825,0.0015062321,0.00081807544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000376857,0.00008959839,0.9970949,0.0000018186437,0.000023685741,0.000009452905,0.0004795685,0.000011782203,0.00006655395,0.00024343395,0.0015435077,0.000058836977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020451197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014011908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00643929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013886848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000029332114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9860717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985449030","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9022-0","title":"Biogeographic patterns of the East African coastal forest vertebrate fauna","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Endemism; Generalist and specialist species; Geography; Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Fauna; Forest ecology; Ecoregion; Biology; Habitat; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.011004850503972206,"score_gpt":0.17927142019771053,"score_spread":0.16826656969373832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985449030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978085,0.0000063189163,0.00028195285,0.0011863527,0.00008946414,0.00006584084,0.00003640008,0.0000067096353,0.00051843544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953306,0.00001326106,0.000031380405,0.00034593279,0.000002902747,4.4989267e-7,0.0000073378837,5.6017484e-7,0.000065088134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969023,0.000017103383,0.00006625867,0.00008141289,0.000069942405,0.00007507203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998312,0.000025097985,0.000060457052,0.000054500582,0.000010371511,0.000018344628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001301954,0.000040694067,0.000044579294,0.000018368806,0.00024116124,0.0000040866353,0.00006422125,0.00003225377,0.00004568081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010693124,0.000032357526,0.000022947926,0.00011859132,0.00023883035,0.00007109145,0.00011867083,0.000033850614,0.000013809612],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013578563,0.000016798685,0.998734,0.0000035054336,0.000007886834,4.774235e-7,0.00033386293,0.000006852658,0.0001346354,0.0003245909,0.00022713696,0.00019668772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001531092,0.000019783929,0.9981253,0.0000026191801,0.000012783453,7.6477613e-7,0.0006521804,0.00020869728,0.0000794377,0.00020004415,0.0005067174,0.000038544196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010454331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028465806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027420374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009001423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000026411878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98926216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985476407","doi":"10.1007/s10531-005-3369-5","title":"On the Relationships between Ground-dwelling Spider (Araneae) Assemblages and Dead Wood in a Northern Sugar Maple Forest","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Spider; Ecology; Forest floor; Biodiversity; Fauna; Deciduous; Ordination; Coarse woody debris; Pitfall trap; Species diversity; Maple; Geography; Biology; Habitat; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.04857257927103548,"score_gpt":0.19235425609797369,"score_spread":0.1437816768269382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985476407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849922,0.000082512226,0.0000019174374,0.014579682,0.000020893884,0.00013917412,0.000033258493,0.000019251183,0.00013113247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994963,0.000033836073,0.000011172364,0.000300273,0.000030297822,0.0000016659519,0.000073391515,1.8227986e-7,0.00005290263],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994588,0.000086928485,0.00008928701,0.00016586561,0.00007631216,0.00012282848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999308,0.0005611666,0.000052793574,0.000025820447,0.000031642674,0.000020615187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025442554,0.00008192333,0.00009214555,0.000015980626,0.0008741006,0.00004245497,0.00006966004,0.000101628495,0.000013148938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045702833,0.000035985962,0.000023112538,0.0001333645,0.00013628133,0.00010790083,0.00005798617,0.00011757418,0.000031363612],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023056276,0.000025991614,0.99753994,0.0000031539018,0.0000076796305,0.000002331275,0.00009276863,0.0000030515846,0.00004728756,0.0012496469,0.0007709778,0.00023413601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001470292,0.00008004368,0.9947041,0.000008393781,0.000017379976,7.836842e-7,0.00085728354,0.000021159565,0.000018162942,0.0029099577,0.0011521984,0.00008350465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041471734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.080464184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07631701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016577787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000028859877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93631494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985655691","doi":"10.1007/s10531-013-0458-8","title":"Plantation forests, climate change and biodiversity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":313,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Climate change; Agroforestry; Deforestation (computer science); Forest management; Reforestation; Afforestation; Ecosystem services; Environmental science; Effects of global warming; Geography; Ecosystem; Ecology; Global warming; Biology","score_opus":0.032937052468817056,"score_gpt":0.1947414751658284,"score_spread":0.16180442269701134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985655691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943329,0.000013827864,0.000004487112,0.003791341,0.000030491514,0.00019907298,0.000030675285,0.00002632091,0.0015708507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968403,0.0003197901,0.00013256763,0.0024225295,0.0000132913365,0.0000050558415,0.000063137115,8.704643e-7,0.00020246833],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999639,0.000014397972,0.000043145006,0.00012483497,0.000071720024,0.00010694892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998543,0.000011698313,0.00003420632,0.00004865137,0.0000049355513,0.000046185916],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005550452,0.000057040932,0.000044147157,0.000028394648,0.00024708098,0.000045274362,0.000043679636,0.000035214573,0.00086660235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000037932925,0.000057105924,0.000009597363,0.000067498244,0.00011350327,0.0005833523,0.00016274278,0.000024949044,0.0019615048],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009458851,0.000007081599,0.96437496,0.000011052322,0.000002595626,7.7499305e-7,0.00044111622,2.7734234e-7,0.000027988845,0.0001704947,0.03132209,0.0036321026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021909754,0.000023811628,0.9809101,0.0000025557956,0.000011959721,9.061069e-7,0.00006374378,0.00047461802,0.000012354824,0.00010915046,0.018096823,0.00007482778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009198479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005882262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016535187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015571204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":7.575472e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986567617","doi":"10.1007/s10531-015-0907-7","title":"Microstructure and cyanobacterial composition of microbial mats from the High Arctic","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Microbial mat; Algal mat; Cyanobacteria; Arctic; Benthic zone; Biomineralization; Ecosystem; Ecology; Aquatic ecosystem; Environmental science; Algae; Biology; Bacteria","score_opus":0.019786815289295965,"score_gpt":0.17837438943051773,"score_spread":0.15858757414122177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986567617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972827,0.00038296965,0.000008717749,0.0014740294,0.00016160836,0.00005276182,0.00056665106,0.0000050418084,0.00006556077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935144,0.00002399278,0.00022636799,0.00020824128,0.000025098463,3.858981e-8,0.0001639013,8.2051066e-8,8.0698635e-7],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997134,0.000051384442,0.000057946203,0.00008117846,0.000046116096,0.000049929928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997944,0.00005410111,0.00004934989,0.000040450705,0.000029709716,0.000031945536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000646607,0.000044052784,0.00006489951,0.0000121628855,0.00013511797,0.0000237798,0.00004462366,0.00005668824,0.00003369492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000065725344,0.000033090775,0.000011129674,0.00003220364,0.00020010215,0.0001084236,0.0000023447565,0.00003875821,0.0000023616476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001884055,0.0000027894428,0.99462456,0.0000041478393,0.0000125614515,0.0000010497597,0.00040830087,4.899772e-7,0.0026494204,0.000030259935,0.0004335319,0.0016445137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040416882,0.000039531657,0.9980785,0.000005990271,0.000024038714,0.0000059283793,0.00015315627,0.000021765536,0.00044691688,0.0006137073,0.00016562425,0.000040654326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01806116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039506014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014110559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":7.9848587e-7,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014742083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98847765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987641427","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0187-9","title":"Do Australian graziers have an offset mindset about their farm trees?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Agroforestry; Woodland; Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Incentive; Business; Agriculture; Geography; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Ecosystem; Ecology; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.05453632459415925,"score_gpt":0.20997648198058302,"score_spread":0.15544015738642378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987641427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99282146,0.0000062505883,0.00007719375,0.0015552557,0.000054602846,0.00018677591,0.000061333005,0.000036772664,0.0052003823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99323124,0.0000510633,0.00067873555,0.004533481,0.000006834757,0.0000053606086,0.00012414345,0.0000033372228,0.0013657829],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925506,0.000051251438,0.000114891795,0.00027998546,0.0001430073,0.00015580402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961394,0.000008286172,0.00007518174,0.00018315352,0.000004837315,0.0001145756],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016271534,0.00012183242,0.00008275486,0.00003510512,0.00026237057,0.000036521702,0.00014783951,0.000067467525,0.0013079689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004762163,0.000118751326,0.00003214245,0.000079374004,0.00025079914,0.00036162385,0.00014192228,0.000060393133,0.00022003874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055001467,0.000104775725,0.96997035,0.000004551762,0.000014727871,0.0000047686212,0.0024106388,0.0000027080519,0.0006445201,0.00022085031,0.01726123,0.009305871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003597308,0.00007552736,0.89689,0.000003655804,0.000021257641,0.000001304521,0.0022017548,0.00010999478,0.0007062355,0.00022777045,0.099246636,0.00015615585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038834272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003216007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08198541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006198936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000308022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988199335","doi":"10.1007/s10531-010-9891-0","title":"Environmental predictors of forest expansion on open coastal barrens","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Pine barrens; Edaphic; Vegetation (pathology); Foredune; Ecology; Coastal plain; Habitat; Biodiversity; Geography; Shore; Geology; Soil water; Biology","score_opus":0.008875229688859235,"score_gpt":0.17906694485697458,"score_spread":0.17019171516811535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988199335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99856675,0.0000012201815,0.0000085963975,0.00025448037,0.00018860167,0.00024233302,0.00010625431,0.000010816463,0.0006209575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996491,0.0000038947956,0.00007955246,0.00015466422,0.000009503394,0.0000022360384,0.00003821702,0.000001748821,0.00006107253],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995027,0.000027975064,0.000081307146,0.0001615776,0.00014732129,0.00007910903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997179,0.000038623235,0.00006713216,0.00012098647,0.0000020835237,0.00005330008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014356445,0.00006651337,0.00007689143,0.000016886068,0.0001280955,0.000018511937,0.00014697753,0.00005972554,0.00037202926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016774176,0.00006418421,0.000017041637,0.000041180218,0.00015856903,0.00024402578,0.00025703612,0.000068696805,0.00016265168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046340534,0.00005475292,0.9640183,0.0000041673834,0.0000039225215,0.0000012114175,0.00014308844,0.0000036098136,0.031457357,0.000020811536,0.0030135906,0.0012328627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038396436,0.00012877914,0.98946434,0.0000059208774,0.000008471646,0.0000019420115,0.00008525287,0.00046099225,0.0037951837,0.000014365523,0.0055795624,0.00007123847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027245698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002438668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027662171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018138555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000044157223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41187528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991282983","doi":"10.1023/b:bioc.0000006503.90980.e8","title":"Rain forest ‘conservation-through-use’? Chambira palm fibre extraction and handicraft production in a land-constrained community, Peruvian Amazon","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Agroforestry; Handicraft; Amazon rainforest; Livelihood; Deforestation (computer science); Palm; Geography; Production (economics); Biodiversity; Scarcity; Peasant; Business; Agriculture; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.07019933547807808,"score_gpt":0.2839986666618003,"score_spread":0.2137993311837222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991282983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98073643,0.00013407473,0.00011722793,0.016913407,0.00015346668,0.00032130186,0.000012432783,0.000043198685,0.0015684727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974845,0.0010574737,0.00024643238,0.00088834745,0.000033308137,0.0000058938244,0.000031678897,0.000001992171,0.00025038703],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888957,0.0004432335,0.00014950632,0.00019308388,0.00013960438,0.00018503313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950016,0.00017766037,0.000095887706,0.00007993739,0.00009336481,0.000052968517],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005555394,0.000104207946,0.00014246939,0.000052819585,0.002161607,0.00010230691,0.000049789338,0.00014291967,0.00007235315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004433875,0.00010045513,0.000024585694,0.00023844073,0.00075984997,0.0007009551,0.00003542016,0.00017555324,0.000006253335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000457628,0.00007708681,0.9804054,0.000018117084,0.000011659012,0.000002834485,0.008696321,0.0000015128869,0.00007157668,0.008018979,0.0015579673,0.0010928123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006375738,0.0001088995,0.9018969,0.000034377732,0.000019484432,0.0000034732088,0.030254632,0.000039306557,0.00006920438,0.0030928657,0.06366257,0.00018068265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060958814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07693903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078508444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006691103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045084413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992554146","doi":"10.1023/b:bioc.0000019403.26948.55","title":"Influence of habitat and microhabitat on epigeal spider (Araneae) assemblages in four stand types","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Linyphiidae; Epigeal; Ecology; Habitat; Spider; Deciduous; Coarse woody debris; Biodiversity; Fauna; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.02205999752465389,"score_gpt":0.19722621269735047,"score_spread":0.17516621517269657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992554146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933642,0.00015569472,1.6756165e-7,0.0062754904,0.00001735549,0.00008960653,0.000047475412,0.000009523154,0.00004044523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99917376,0.00027670895,0.000030163694,0.000492039,0.000005578398,5.4701496e-7,0.000007931182,1.0109342e-7,0.000013159787],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959254,0.000025959063,0.00007893986,0.00014478379,0.00006181253,0.00009593375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997565,0.00010927238,0.000047613485,0.000018022285,0.000043090084,0.000025473988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000102863094,0.00006884566,0.000109783185,0.000018463148,0.00018350901,0.000011067753,0.000050502902,0.0000742255,0.0000054377674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041300205,0.00003501307,0.000016869824,0.000102981234,0.00018827613,0.00012234319,0.00005664049,0.00005159927,0.0000097553275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010205297,0.000041628413,0.99487823,0.000013914163,0.000009113485,0.000006807009,0.00015079284,0.000019724646,0.004033075,0.00018819244,0.00016412734,0.00039231352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033248527,0.00028012943,0.9973016,0.000023174163,0.000009974835,0.000001736163,0.0003169438,0.0000014820682,0.0008702201,0.0004263288,0.00036404782,0.00007189748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096465566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036558195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058095297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000150609085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005779751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2040033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992991671","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-9995-1","title":"How functional is functional? Ecological groupings in terrestrial animal ecology: towards an animal functional type approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Ecology; Biology; Trait; Functional ecology; Categorization; Habitat; Computer science; Ecosystem; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07582659100109937,"score_gpt":0.20594865057566364,"score_spread":0.13012205957456427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992991671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995305,0.000012164484,0.00041618646,0.0024588257,0.00026373114,0.00015527714,0.000014581244,0.000035988898,0.0013382264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99703366,0.000017654405,0.00077222247,0.0017852078,0.000048211103,0.000011224268,0.00013210611,0.0000023794403,0.00019731524],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990474,0.00008605723,0.00013192746,0.00038127587,0.00016700181,0.00018632953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999718,0.000040821735,0.000083544015,0.00007141218,0.00002243874,0.000063755775],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025931987,0.00013022328,0.000134927,0.00006462859,0.00041724177,0.000030282672,0.00008131354,0.00020399128,0.0010662155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048818896,0.00012808984,0.000036459118,0.0002012421,0.0003755591,0.00081896933,0.0001520864,0.00015632085,0.00009494148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009165451,0.00028954644,0.9924939,0.0000033222773,0.000024293147,0.0000042529696,0.00044151483,0.000013417963,0.0002721326,0.0012174235,0.004185642,0.00013798483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008363596,0.00042224306,0.99369216,9.250223e-7,0.000026547817,0.000009694401,0.0005904416,0.0026010934,0.000017613871,0.00087796507,0.00077692786,0.00014801242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026123362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089065486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034087142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011250835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003082944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997080100","doi":"10.1007/s10531-010-9914-x","title":"Plant diversity in wooded moderate-rich fens across boreal western Canada: an ecoregional perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; MacEwan University","funders":"Natural Resources Canada","keywords":"Ecoregion; Vascular plant; Bryophyte; Species richness; Ecology; Boreal; Wetland; Biodiversity; Geography; Ordination; Taiga; Species diversity; Nestedness; Indicator species; Environmental science; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.02180717416264833,"score_gpt":0.21499542786322537,"score_spread":0.19318825370057705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997080100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99728423,0.000002284515,0.0000088587385,0.00202266,0.000083948915,0.00007598401,0.00020090968,0.00001128055,0.00030982474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99890447,0.000007625516,0.00003990579,0.00086196937,0.000013750026,0.0000010394888,0.00011938123,0.0000010749262,0.000050768987],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993676,0.000029269675,0.000064266285,0.00023402701,0.00012480958,0.00018005645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975854,0.00002356767,0.000038399976,0.00007864623,0.0000150464475,0.000085801505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011526711,0.000079866884,0.000093451315,0.000015805317,0.00044713245,0.000022437858,0.000111885216,0.00008159982,0.00007933892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000075880916,0.00007985624,0.000010965458,0.00006808436,0.00013304163,0.00023047147,0.00027290452,0.00013002362,0.000009397655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010418933,0.00004180914,0.99583614,0.0000010743631,0.0000043720133,0.000025207852,0.001561313,0.000009803741,0.00007693552,0.00009178679,0.0021680358,0.000079347345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056597195,0.000036407455,0.99657506,9.21479e-7,0.000005549059,0.000009064934,0.0009958633,0.00083930197,0.000041372747,0.00020667091,0.00061479385,0.000108999906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8154115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17457199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016835917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047877555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34390265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998862125","doi":"10.1007/s10531-009-9588-4","title":"Non-random sampling and its role in habitat conservation: a comparison of three wetland macrophyte sampling protocols","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Wetland; Macrophyte; Marsh; Habitat; Ecology; Biodiversity; Quadrat; Transect; Environmental science; Diversity index; Waterfowl; Bay; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.04296052915157061,"score_gpt":0.25999482995408824,"score_spread":0.21703430080251762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998862125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99690527,0.000033503184,0.00050718256,0.0009872731,0.000016361484,0.0014460373,0.000015608053,0.0000127299645,0.00007604318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99875623,0.000014779399,0.0008743115,0.00029200356,0.0000063573048,0.000029992692,0.000020384268,0.0000014412757,0.0000044918065],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999355,0.000017342503,0.00018530467,0.00019175859,0.00012924531,0.000121315716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971867,0.000048425896,0.00010187785,0.00007065879,0.000018204868,0.00004216023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015069697,0.00009154589,0.00016639517,0.00003980943,0.00014747542,0.000030357325,0.00006944466,0.00006537561,0.000007103404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016812019,0.000091529386,0.000018601702,0.00015074086,0.00007957992,0.00023993322,0.00006471998,0.00006785632,0.0000072599523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022414436,0.00005605401,0.99547607,0.000020895493,0.000003229371,6.6065854e-7,0.00053782074,0.00010380347,0.0018301198,0.000034621287,0.000044609507,0.0016679879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015541678,0.00010766418,0.97638386,0.000049069753,0.000010600378,0.0000013101666,0.00014153578,0.018635435,0.00056762336,0.0019038022,0.00053434074,0.000110615685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072814175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000516687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019092219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029334169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000067291157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.373246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005308606","doi":"10.1007/s10531-012-0255-9","title":"Can bison play a role in conserving habitat for endangered sandhills species in Canada?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Lethbridge","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Innovates","keywords":"Endangered species; Threatened species; Habitat; Biodiversity; Ecology; Geography; Sandhill; Disturbance (geology); Trampling; Wildlife; Ecosystem; Agroforestry; Grazing; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.015281509124544292,"score_gpt":0.1851559433691234,"score_spread":0.1698744342445791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005308606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952757,0.00008340532,0.0000103886105,0.004009692,0.00005963645,0.00014080411,0.000049758935,0.0000039593247,0.0003666575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986589,0.00003522365,0.00014995228,0.0010803575,0.0000041522167,0.000007194632,0.000016019068,8.6869676e-7,0.000047339057],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960464,0.000025430516,0.0000799145,0.00009190751,0.000049495986,0.00014863696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978226,0.000112971604,0.000036329806,0.000033683522,0.0000054043535,0.00002937593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012962132,0.00005160556,0.00007642029,0.000028305336,0.00012656003,0.000005085501,0.00003841052,0.0000321464,0.000044698994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038038183,0.000055626664,0.00000863298,0.00008075908,0.000060650353,0.000121500736,0.000051764997,0.000037104353,0.0000048772667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024327695,0.000014640117,0.9969075,0.0000054516245,0.0000031607324,6.511967e-7,0.0014019259,0.000020191474,0.00019436424,0.00011840243,0.0011442661,0.00016513102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003748961,0.000009366555,0.9955817,0.0000051163893,0.000004569967,5.1590536e-7,0.0018942013,0.0005706303,0.000074033516,0.00014540256,0.0012716424,0.00006792237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5437853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99157554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4477903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028905115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031925232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45925272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006296064","doi":"10.1007/s10531-008-9539-5","title":"Species richness, abundance, rarity and environmental gradients in coastal barren vegetation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Lichen and fungal ecology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Vascular plant; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Sphagnum; Lichen; Plant community; Bog; Moss; Ordination; Abundance (ecology); Biodiversity; Geography; Environmental science; Peat; Biology","score_opus":0.021841786151804748,"score_gpt":0.16045828238454182,"score_spread":0.13861649623273709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006296064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99883425,0.00008093953,7.73231e-7,0.00076063344,0.00004009979,0.0000689066,0.000050297058,0.000010059999,0.00015406309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991781,0.00027606264,0.000015256228,0.0003030034,0.0000151183485,0.0000010669214,0.00013578369,9.2467644e-8,0.00007549224],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965864,0.00002754844,0.000059751965,0.00012265395,0.000053515396,0.00007791296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998867,0.000035645295,0.000028660657,0.000011970091,0.0000060295492,0.00003103002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000050104314,0.000048962538,0.00006431561,0.000009367376,0.00022651498,0.000011606721,0.000032157575,0.00005032873,0.0000365976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000070226542,0.000026385893,0.000010777092,0.00006269595,0.00013536088,0.00016224709,0.000041079868,0.000041254083,0.00000929235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002213063,0.000033434833,0.9932792,0.000002480287,0.000002084333,0.00000367367,0.00023395069,1.1546393e-7,0.005234814,0.00006748706,0.00020911884,0.0009114841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020778431,0.000049171824,0.99580747,0.0000020426453,0.000003146714,0.000005502059,0.00032853743,0.000055679844,0.00013531573,0.0000678956,0.0032777193,0.00005973267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005303679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021385346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050994977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011005028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000025036588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1742193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006686729","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0002-7","title":"Developing MPA performance indicators with local stakeholders’ input in the Pacific Rim National Park Reserve, Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Parks Canada; University of Victoria","keywords":"Stakeholder; Performance indicator; National park; Environmental resource management; Identification (biology); Business; Marine protected area; Process (computing); Corporate governance; Process management; Biodiversity; Computer science; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.07552531353833879,"score_gpt":0.1812006626877963,"score_spread":0.10567534914945752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006686729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953487,0.0000072745283,0.00003405338,0.0014116953,0.000024249079,0.000092188275,0.00000789883,0.0000052619607,0.0030686974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993373,0.000018364224,0.00007766832,0.0005003682,0.0000031997567,0.000004153341,0.000008717957,6.659974e-7,0.000049569284],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994991,0.000027093887,0.00006727779,0.00011152048,0.00020192025,0.00009312267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998652,0.000019872261,0.000041053157,0.00004430387,0.000011139371,0.000018476168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001682107,0.000055046294,0.00004930315,0.000022425924,0.00024783687,0.00000944616,0.000087722474,0.000018263752,0.0000405445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000683842,0.0000386601,0.0000050578997,0.0002063461,0.00010436134,0.0001580121,0.00008425045,0.000050963394,0.0000090577705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024047478,0.000008274777,0.99315464,0.000007638562,0.0000038651256,0.0000031047377,0.00093432935,0.0000018666098,8.6018963e-7,0.00009806434,0.0048784893,0.0008847884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015380666,0.000024099203,0.9854009,0.000007987491,0.0000032631363,0.000002492269,0.0025134531,0.00007993022,0.000026018175,0.000032829794,0.011687535,0.000067693494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34019578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6508697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31067395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013832161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006601533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6641979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006973360","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-6905-9","title":"Population trends and calling phenology of anuran populations surveyed in Ontario estimated using acoustic surveys","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Species richness; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Phenology; Ecology; Biodiversity; Geography; Local extinction; Population; Habitat; Biological dispersal; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.07715162688704062,"score_gpt":0.25372107744079025,"score_spread":0.17656945055374962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006973360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99909717,0.0000143726775,0.00052523945,0.0002127295,0.00003084079,0.00004810889,0.000011448823,0.000009077621,0.00005100917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982215,0.000005657526,0.0015763463,0.000045847293,0.0000031413501,2.492331e-7,0.00009488755,0.000001073121,0.000051260584],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994859,0.000112568945,0.00012786091,0.00013974124,0.000047630627,0.0000862935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999823,0.000025368852,0.00007043982,0.000047555433,0.0000073456076,0.000026299867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002392335,0.00005735063,0.00010143227,0.000065063825,0.00009919558,0.0000055807373,0.000028498176,0.00008427829,0.00016726398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015774951,0.00005894547,0.000010425386,0.000120913675,0.00012223452,0.00013908609,0.00004187422,0.00004829793,0.0000032821515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015549786,0.000019793,0.9908904,0.000001972696,0.0000024522467,5.412745e-7,0.00026916212,0.0016119804,0.002436175,0.00001049269,0.000016271886,0.004725252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028790484,0.000019880743,0.9788204,0.000004811907,0.000011566902,0.0000028423601,0.000038344828,0.020669356,0.000025890453,0.00002762027,0.000028793094,0.00006260143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2857984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6291468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3433484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109355184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007261114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71895754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008009932","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0148-3","title":"The efficacy of common species as indicators: avian responses to disturbance in British Columbia, Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Guild; Common species; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Abundance (ecology); Biodiversity; Biology; Species diversity; Rare species; Relative species abundance; Habitat","score_opus":0.011031559973794448,"score_gpt":0.1711309428886446,"score_spread":0.16009938291485015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008009932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998638,0.000022956972,7.763855e-7,0.00038177875,0.00006411701,0.00019881611,0.000043499356,0.000005931335,0.00064412813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99925303,0.000010447909,0.000017131768,0.0003029906,0.000002785925,0.000002521469,0.0000034061036,0.0000010615825,0.00040661544],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994731,0.00007751533,0.00009893282,0.00011744932,0.00013807017,0.0000949328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964494,0.00014279051,0.00006077461,0.00010190752,0.0000050791527,0.00004450094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018429056,0.000035287085,0.00007317343,0.000011084006,0.00019047294,0.000035488894,0.00013719992,0.000025853715,0.00010025228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100026096,0.000046045247,0.000009713859,0.00018060676,0.00013354296,0.00007902253,0.000091771224,0.0000388899,0.000018880284],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003688252,0.000022590686,0.9896278,0.000004204171,0.0000024959536,0.000008340969,0.00037437736,1.0022798e-7,0.000051147646,0.0000040271293,0.0073783197,0.0024897384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016276987,0.00004145559,0.9867529,0.000017358845,0.0000030873916,0.0000018263228,0.00029764153,0.000004585225,0.00014037675,0.0000100224615,0.012511918,0.000056019213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077462713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010888995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002849873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18776706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010866774","doi":"10.1007/s10531-014-0840-1","title":"Combining phytolith analysis with historical ecology to reveal the long-term, local-scale dynamics within a savannah-forest landscape mosaic","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Archaeology and ancient environmental studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; Université de Sherbrooke; University of Guelph; University of British Columbia","funders":"Nature; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; Nature Conservancy","keywords":"Phytolith; Vegetation (pathology); Historical ecology; Ecology; Biodiversity; Geography; Physical geography; Range (aeronautics); Mosaic; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.009308622137184823,"score_gpt":0.16746018706513624,"score_spread":0.1581515649279514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010866774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99173194,0.00005770567,0.003499852,0.0043223193,0.000060212307,0.00008173533,0.0000357627,0.000014051874,0.00019642543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979396,0.00001749724,0.00018248368,0.0014356318,0.000011151166,7.237654e-7,0.00017465962,5.6259853e-7,0.0002376975],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943376,0.00006858142,0.00008138671,0.00018097815,0.000098628465,0.00013668429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997026,0.00008410787,0.000057311994,0.0000810826,0.000013270103,0.00006166452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001702408,0.00007922973,0.00013514886,0.000046980298,0.00053203455,0.000010270128,0.0000897489,0.000045032295,0.00004629656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007982821,0.00005318366,0.000025532418,0.0002011062,0.00026354307,0.00006994591,0.000039067287,0.00007500034,0.000036862657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008784022,0.000010005944,0.99605924,0.0000044778344,0.000053653057,0.0000029183443,0.0004294657,0.0011141263,1.9862225e-7,0.00003403664,0.0005395376,0.0016645171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019452782,0.00020631711,0.9881537,0.0000031369686,0.00012842337,0.000004083228,0.00029946887,0.010335825,0.0000018759952,0.000047951682,0.00054181187,0.0000828809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012284177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07879771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0775693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019209918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000074013237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9380118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020008633","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9039-4","title":"Unsustainable collection and unfair trade? Uncovering and assessing assumptions regarding Central Himalayan medicinal plant conservation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Resource (disambiguation); Medicinal plants; Agroforestry; Biodiversity; Business; Plant species; Biodiversity conservation; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Government (linguistics); Environmental resource management; Geography; Agriculture; Economics; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.011027714807505749,"score_gpt":0.18025353494644691,"score_spread":0.16922582013894116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020008633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897046,0.000087951645,0.0005301785,0.008483507,0.00007923938,0.00024965097,0.000023413402,0.000059648297,0.0007818283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998238,0.00015746018,0.0004629131,0.0006888074,0.00003003359,0.0000026725527,0.00009531735,0.0000032640185,0.00032149916],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989803,0.00006758845,0.00016541213,0.0003276426,0.00022697737,0.00023207908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996334,0.00006513926,0.000118680095,0.00008132883,0.000017993081,0.00008348983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000264736,0.00014276602,0.00013209089,0.00009414003,0.0012456632,0.00017709353,0.000055674685,0.00009063432,0.0000524997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024874844,0.00015175856,0.000023487477,0.00024403294,0.00028111882,0.0005867792,0.00016767257,0.00009257284,0.000004010492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038721642,0.000030180881,0.9924538,0.000043493794,0.000014448501,0.000008265699,0.00041311435,0.00007722661,0.0005773411,0.00011821818,0.0054910565,0.00073411985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007881711,0.000039502393,0.9684527,0.00002535118,0.00008501487,0.0000158217,0.0024557041,0.0036174401,0.00007784194,0.00020524663,0.02405855,0.0001786736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010845097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015699815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024001133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020916572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019127465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020507731","doi":"10.1007/s10531-008-9445-x","title":"Trends and prospects for local knowledge in ecological and conservation research and monitoring","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":274,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Traditional knowledge; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Process (computing); Geography; Environmental planning; Agriculture; Indigenous; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.23733203477087458,"score_gpt":0.40505115333829084,"score_spread":0.16771911856741625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020507731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932925,0.00049531093,0.000019281728,0.0052729733,0.00010001289,0.0004701906,0.000016937343,0.000015444879,0.000317366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980029,0.001158975,0.00014215954,0.00022119148,0.00004659265,0.000046727295,0.000012217949,0.0000019892345,0.0003672726],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914384,0.00012137459,0.00013871316,0.00021242732,0.00005358028,0.00033009468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991197,0.0005380627,0.000043984568,0.000041920077,0.00020091332,0.00005544096],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063500414,0.000069679874,0.00015045359,0.00013077844,0.0036367192,0.000007714756,0.000024913355,0.00017968436,0.000008279027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008409336,0.00006641943,0.000007112805,0.00014059717,0.00034048205,0.000098857374,0.00016829242,0.00018969561,0.0000042059596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015185194,0.00004627434,0.98304623,0.00010650589,0.0000073310234,0.000004151734,0.011832757,6.819121e-8,0.000023951121,0.0010703763,0.0026780942,0.0010324252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012340007,0.00028423883,0.97863024,0.000021968075,0.000006791632,0.0000038427997,0.013039814,0.00023051159,0.000008640408,0.00027543228,0.0061948295,0.00006967562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025700144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010818989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008248975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009671398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007504922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022195842","doi":"10.1007/s10531-015-0880-1","title":"Paleoecology and fire history of Garry oak ecosystems in Canada: implications for conservation and environmental management","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Parks Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Ecosystem; Climate change; Geography; Ecology; Fire regime; Paleoecology; Disturbance (geology); Endangered species; Biodiversity; Novel ecosystem; Vegetation (pathology); Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.01784695105911444,"score_gpt":0.16763423285970036,"score_spread":0.14978728180058593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022195842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99742067,0.00024860253,0.000021372554,0.0015218708,0.00009338754,0.00045350828,0.000095990836,0.0000050887643,0.0001395185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991993,0.00007092211,0.00012626224,0.00043047595,0.0000032837074,0.000021499129,0.000067701214,0.000001782586,0.00007878863],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994865,0.000043683103,0.00013371892,0.00017701543,0.000069132366,0.000089930014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996958,0.00006937487,0.0000946373,0.00007595791,0.0000052923447,0.000058950725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019320461,0.000066879446,0.00010834792,0.00002458534,0.000048186434,0.000004179991,0.000043257707,0.000041316795,0.0000120836785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012273388,0.000076526136,0.0000073617393,0.000033117234,0.000095010335,0.00012610835,0.000072492105,0.000024802013,0.0000021769836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002649676,0.000016120825,0.9763483,0.000052456526,0.0000071011555,8.958681e-7,0.00019472162,0.0000034028374,0.00032026702,0.00004652917,0.020963985,0.0020197239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006865193,0.000047226196,0.9686542,0.000008525929,0.000016877437,0.000004105621,0.00058409653,0.0035386197,0.000016139451,0.000040198745,0.02632393,0.00007955426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3616296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70836854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34673893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000844626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049182403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64262134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023022648","doi":"10.1007/s10531-012-0392-1","title":"When invasive exotic populations are threatened with extinction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Foundation for Dietetic Research","keywords":"Threatened species; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Introduced species; Invasive species; Biology; Ecology; Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Population; Sympatric speciation; Habitat","score_opus":0.050933701931255605,"score_gpt":0.19610776933964108,"score_spread":0.14517406740838548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023022648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947675,0.000018711133,0.00039748606,0.0040221605,0.00008351634,0.00013787478,0.000006159332,0.000038082413,0.000528533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99702615,0.000009153362,0.0008098741,0.0018650035,0.000020330759,0.0000062170416,0.000042631873,0.0000018377118,0.00021878579],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995258,0.00004354207,0.00007139155,0.00013067684,0.000094908304,0.00013367685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997208,0.00003287109,0.000087868844,0.00008244213,0.00001511024,0.000060891918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010891599,0.00007430544,0.00006562104,0.000024685227,0.00037134936,0.000015819105,0.00004302702,0.000068804795,0.00057262165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026123142,0.00006866895,0.000013351197,0.00010051831,0.00011822271,0.0006860607,0.000049877373,0.0000495788,0.0002908553],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039963517,0.00003629965,0.99411863,0.0000034377354,0.0000069632506,0.0000011155336,0.00034965348,0.000010817066,0.000067312954,0.00011597911,0.004979575,0.00027026536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027276267,0.00003167069,0.99727815,0.000005411631,0.00003995014,0.000010339438,0.00036063368,0.000048524493,0.000054790744,0.00035593868,0.001445137,0.000096663825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057329255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018834836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035344379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005608095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007229248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62698054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023787385","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9141-7","title":"A comparison of some population density sampling techniques for biodiversity, conservation, and environmental impact studies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transect; Stratified sampling; Sampling (signal processing); Distance sampling; Biodiversity; Reef; Index of dispersion; Quarter (Canadian coin); Statistics; Population density; Point (geometry); Systematic sampling; Population; Environmental science; Geography; Physical geography; Ecology; Mathematics; Biology; Computer science; Geometry; Demography","score_opus":0.05810468545141796,"score_gpt":0.30148898238608085,"score_spread":0.2433842969346629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023787385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975379,0.000070956994,0.00080313336,0.0011298788,0.000035763303,0.00031785472,0.000058180623,0.000023106688,0.000023201817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774855,0.00015858556,0.0011416153,0.0008342797,0.0000057667885,0.0000019425097,0.000095601325,0.0000010133691,0.000012660008],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994473,0.000021443857,0.0001431142,0.00017617788,0.00008393071,0.00012804919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996392,0.00013113976,0.000122234,0.00005616605,0.0000142760355,0.000037000005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004153651,0.00008944715,0.00015894244,0.0000668188,0.00062330347,0.000009019317,0.00004487426,0.0000698465,0.000017038632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004950659,0.00009108068,0.00002745987,0.00005928604,0.00029600077,0.00024636727,0.0001858565,0.00004246341,0.000004618851],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008105081,0.00003650332,0.99157494,0.000022765578,0.00004824406,3.4918637e-7,0.0005450432,0.0000028069746,0.00046888218,0.00009105963,0.006387341,0.0007409942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026133598,0.00010689627,0.99532753,0.000005480978,0.000067341665,6.516141e-7,0.0016575365,0.0000790708,0.00089593354,0.00056350464,0.0009390773,0.00009561053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004962072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012566857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007604785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110665984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000026799225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7501201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024549478","doi":"10.1007/s10531-005-4317-0","title":"Assessment of Extinction Risk and Reasons for Decline in Sturgeon","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Biological Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Acipenser; Sturgeon; Beluga; Fishery; Huso; Geography; Endangered species; Fish migration; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.011598117007413276,"score_gpt":0.21310163471283822,"score_spread":0.20150351770542493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024549478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967288,0.00000789343,0.00076802936,0.0015336103,0.000018909404,0.00012888119,0.000013777747,0.000004645288,0.00079545047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872845,0.00009724599,0.0008709323,0.00021707041,0.0000023972361,0.0000038324674,0.000013438631,3.532639e-7,0.000066269524],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977696,0.000015284219,0.00005251433,0.00008182755,0.00003176067,0.000041660503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998785,0.000041482836,0.000046373356,0.000023800088,0.0000041676876,0.000005663679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016173003,0.000027403463,0.000045753528,0.000016524862,0.00010813747,0.0000030237566,0.000014998345,0.000022712813,0.000028174012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013115907,0.000028008388,0.00000648427,0.00004018812,0.00007100732,0.00007324184,0.00006924003,0.000016705193,0.0000010786229],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014545688,0.000030468385,0.99246687,0.0000065360396,0.0000028558327,1.5438142e-7,0.00001907235,0.00001641343,0.000042518135,0.00018791277,0.006726879,0.00048579377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037668468,0.000035395617,0.9924111,0.0000016055005,0.000017007183,9.3184326e-8,0.000096036,0.0005441872,0.000014019836,0.0007660316,0.00570897,0.000028895605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022116983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013459437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011247738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015869713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000012581548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7510682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024929836","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-3913-8","title":"The importance of littoral forest remnants for indigenous bird conservation in southeastern Madagascar","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rio Tinto; Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government","keywords":"Littoral zone; Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Threatened species; Endemism; Biodiversity; Deforestation (computer science); Old-growth forest; Biodiversity hotspot; Secondary forest; Agroforestry; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.01661087153167963,"score_gpt":0.2150037717367396,"score_spread":0.19839290020505995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024929836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948345,0.00007239925,0.00014776742,0.004602295,0.00003408057,0.00022710401,0.000016833452,0.000010184432,0.000054830914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987118,0.000067140485,0.00037423547,0.00071158505,0.0000062318827,0.000007595109,0.000008663422,0.0000015362724,0.000111217356],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999571,0.000023704453,0.00013391061,0.000106349864,0.00006389971,0.000101080695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999693,0.0001043541,0.00010711927,0.000061025403,0.000019628653,0.000014872562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025351616,0.000049941482,0.00006802289,0.000017317954,0.0002874131,0.000008209231,0.00006609743,0.00006246856,0.000004610397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038539154,0.000042532534,0.000017693223,0.00007537399,0.00018508418,0.00014279854,0.00004734745,0.0000426723,0.000012054943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006353871,0.000018967014,0.9974693,0.0000061853966,0.000005666913,2.1962147e-7,0.0010015276,0.000052157215,0.000045872992,0.00022504794,0.00024063751,0.0008708519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038371183,0.00003539988,0.99347746,0.0000038604753,0.000008032248,5.675877e-7,0.00046766113,0.003146116,0.000024452867,0.0007004425,0.0017037573,0.000048522856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006502744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09158132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09093105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030753876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009950941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92499495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029402545","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-0255-5","title":"Habitat Islands, Forest Edge and Spring-active Invertebrate Assemblages","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Clearcutting; Habitat; Ecology; Old-growth forest; Epigeal; Secondary forest; Biodiversity; Fauna; Geography; Forest management; Biology","score_opus":0.023832503355623258,"score_gpt":0.18783083236316916,"score_spread":0.1639983290075459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029402545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98664963,0.0001382719,0.0000011698097,0.012736057,0.000042392257,0.00008997938,0.000053716416,0.000035770125,0.0002530243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979018,0.00028187508,0.000042991556,0.0015946777,0.00004287318,0.0000011571484,0.000034567653,1.3346995e-7,0.00009993185],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995469,0.000027619513,0.00006051343,0.00018124151,0.000058325702,0.0001254431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976814,0.0000735839,0.000044695946,0.000019721308,0.00004560656,0.000048279042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000074267045,0.00008593628,0.0000969598,0.000012137719,0.0005830994,0.000035864592,0.000059499944,0.000086471126,0.000038383227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021275633,0.000042361804,0.000023212478,0.00007767693,0.00016261521,0.0002612725,0.00012498323,0.000058715472,0.00006168803],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047192894,0.000023678205,0.98771405,0.000004285776,0.00001858737,0.0000019826748,0.00015141835,1.4083334e-7,0.0007641211,0.00020690949,0.0052119945,0.0058556115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020074702,0.00010305227,0.9764516,0.0000040562813,0.000021202717,0.0000022232305,0.00062039425,0.000071024144,0.00029043006,0.000109245404,0.022020373,0.0001056894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073980255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018495586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017755782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012802538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032912403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029876830","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0189-7","title":"Spatial patterns in the diversity of sharks, rays, and chimaeras (Chondrichthyes) in the Southwest Atlantic","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Body size and species richness; Chondrichthyes; Biodiversity; Ecology; Demersal zone; Bycatch; Fishery; Species diversity; Biology; Geography; Pelagic zone; Fishing","score_opus":0.02455866100814984,"score_gpt":0.18285212252358815,"score_spread":0.1582934615154383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029876830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987344,0.000007919574,0.000023452752,0.000740302,0.000027693706,0.000112938265,0.000011423822,0.0000024805765,0.00033935858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897575,0.000041064955,0.000018235027,0.00093976373,0.000003850304,9.891234e-7,0.000014601716,3.8096388e-7,0.0000053585172],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995618,0.0001228391,0.000066631736,0.000109677145,0.000059417278,0.0000796474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998297,0.00004838019,0.000036524492,0.00007256918,0.0000030445965,0.000009799111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026540272,0.000049775917,0.00006280467,0.000021364871,0.00013791097,0.0000041522253,0.00014735083,0.00005478953,0.00014624196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012852544,0.000032821445,0.00001111682,0.000063920364,0.0002065598,0.00007960126,0.00025175384,0.00007324844,0.000015457565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054957884,0.000041672472,0.990833,0.000003807966,0.000002415663,0.0000066531916,0.008510412,1.6208901e-7,0.00003731422,0.00008358468,0.00016505926,0.00026096837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003066376,0.000049718867,0.9981409,0.0000021206267,0.000012346222,0.0000056121385,0.001070489,0.00002261592,0.000014570658,0.00015531416,0.0001788715,0.000040848423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07828546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036763277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041522183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007806446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000025822517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98081326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032001483","doi":"10.1007/s10531-014-0703-9","title":"Environmental change in Garry oak (Quercus garryana) ecosystems: the evolution of an eco-cultural landscape","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Geology and Paleoclimatology Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Simon Fraser University; Parks Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada; Parks Canada; Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions","keywords":"Woodland; Geography; Ecology; Paleoecology; Land use; Historical ecology; Ecosystem; Biology","score_opus":0.020695507276922404,"score_gpt":0.200362536286635,"score_spread":0.1796670290097126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032001483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99790686,0.00022569396,0.0000022927902,0.001300629,0.000059909995,0.00011052997,0.000061539235,0.000006165535,0.00032639902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995248,0.000059643986,0.0000130961125,0.00019020517,0.00001854187,6.91204e-7,0.00018290733,2.6401602e-7,0.0000098890705],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993921,0.00022519758,0.000078108584,0.00011404825,0.000078059595,0.00011249838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975705,0.000082691404,0.000045511737,0.000072570794,0.000010132735,0.000032041135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035447135,0.000050267336,0.000081348684,0.000047804966,0.00017832713,0.000009598891,0.0000884461,0.00008092163,0.00024850038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014006138,0.000036595597,0.000014747843,0.000060195427,0.00014592364,0.00025957162,0.000011639177,0.0000747348,0.000073765426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045518296,0.0000089193545,0.9988194,0.000010396582,0.0000040060536,0.0000014076609,0.000371801,0.0000052932105,0.000013332557,0.0000652737,0.00007698434,0.000577643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025695155,0.00007732291,0.98694885,0.0000043001423,0.0000066384387,0.000010413333,0.0011574926,0.010900556,0.000012790163,0.0000801578,0.00049854355,0.000045991255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053325645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032883894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02755133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002384455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008857475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98476344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032502879","doi":"10.1007/s10531-009-9696-1","title":"Q’eqchi’ Maya healers’ traditional knowledge in prioritizing conservation of medicinal plants: culturally relative conservation in sustaining traditional holistic health promotion","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Cleveland State University","keywords":"Maya; Biodiversity; Geography; Traditional knowledge; Ethnobiology; Agroforestry; Ecology; Biology; Indigenous; Archaeology","score_opus":0.17506510743669637,"score_gpt":0.2802605532144456,"score_spread":0.10519544577774922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032502879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9467444,0.00032893193,0.000016919646,0.05194152,0.00007061298,0.0003253001,0.0001738629,0.00002146381,0.00037699626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996978,0.00031799762,0.00011307476,0.0017684178,0.00006270286,0.000004803577,0.00073284504,3.286862e-7,0.00002182092],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986679,0.00017089397,0.00042464427,0.0002659443,0.00025283225,0.00021781659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999066,0.00047477777,0.00022648406,0.000025836367,0.00012677797,0.00008010238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000588607,0.00013963756,0.00028605608,0.00006291004,0.00026209388,0.00001641446,0.00007637151,0.00011413452,0.000021605223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015350062,0.00008244182,0.00003670788,0.00035708785,0.00016695647,0.0004198158,0.000014012715,0.00021100436,0.0000023088546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014140637,0.0021948563,0.8435527,0.00034215505,0.00006501595,0.000063579966,0.014005576,0.000010587848,0.02307713,0.048920553,0.0080188755,0.05833492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008531358,0.0007962529,0.98600143,0.00038952008,0.000008752429,0.000014205017,0.0054726563,0.0003591073,0.000036676836,0.0057015303,0.00023354923,0.00013319438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019789909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005101396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14244874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013590461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068511006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33618796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033663910","doi":"10.1007/s10531-014-0838-8","title":"Spatial patterns and environmental correlates of bryophyte richness: sampling effort matters","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Body size and species richness; Ecology; Bryophyte; Sampling (signal processing); Biodiversity; Biological dispersal; Species diversity; Rank abundance curve; Sampling bias; Biology; Geography; Statistics; Species evenness; Mathematics; Population; Sample size determination","score_opus":0.012423149791599303,"score_gpt":0.16692816112706277,"score_spread":0.15450501133546346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033663910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982265,0.000050434788,0.00004793923,0.0013319013,0.00018761381,0.000054293585,0.000078902965,0.000008813945,0.000013553005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921626,0.00020968606,0.000023840872,0.00041544155,0.00006845972,5.534611e-7,0.000054615106,1.520261e-7,0.000011005705],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996857,0.000012593228,0.000068513116,0.0001102626,0.000055207423,0.00006774827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998515,0.000046773104,0.000054038053,0.00001546419,0.000007263093,0.000024922067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000054007625,0.00005559044,0.000082653525,0.0000050621256,0.0001851022,0.00001134642,0.000032546286,0.00003962817,0.000033443463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002693351,0.000026045962,0.000020344909,0.000023799646,0.00007435159,0.000050455885,0.000062406856,0.00002885867,0.0000027447506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016730412,0.000012110568,0.9816087,0.000009892532,0.00000780204,1.4505311e-7,0.000056696404,2.2385517e-7,0.0018537967,0.000010158459,0.00020548083,0.01621825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119351906,0.00008716292,0.99322146,0.000010177075,0.00001436716,0.0000012596582,0.00041458153,0.00014594934,0.000100259465,0.00003018944,0.0057913614,0.000063860716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015270365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002851234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01615439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000042448814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":5.820974e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23084326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034164941","doi":"10.1007/s10531-012-0383-2","title":"Assessing declines of North American bumble bees (Bombus spp.) using museum specimens","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; York University","funders":"Division of Biological Infrastructure; University of Connecticut; American Museum of Natural History","keywords":"Nearctic ecozone; Pollinator; Apidae; Ecology; Fauna; Hymenoptera; Biology; Biodiversity; Geography; Pollination; Pollen; Taxonomy (biology)","score_opus":0.13725492602399475,"score_gpt":0.2411876275395411,"score_spread":0.10393270151554634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034164941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99917763,0.0000960078,0.0000021851524,0.0005491477,0.000027554834,0.000036682835,0.000048446447,0.000014383025,0.000047931066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99947536,0.00008820427,0.0001873326,0.00015210123,0.00006871506,1.7120053e-7,0.000020537705,1.1692494e-7,0.000007472],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964553,0.000019147277,0.000072473056,0.000077000375,0.000070416456,0.00011542316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997685,0.000058780137,0.00008897089,0.0000082956785,0.00004045262,0.00003502989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000063720996,0.000055987955,0.000100157195,0.0000073869505,0.0002482062,0.000024082945,0.000040564493,0.000015439322,0.0000126268715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013363964,0.000026231113,0.000023637247,0.00015098165,0.00009209571,0.00025692317,0.00005090445,0.00002446568,0.000005358383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001140566,0.000026573383,0.9710735,0.0000035573387,0.000008143717,3.3884186e-7,0.00004769392,1.7104415e-7,0.0252532,0.000008903977,0.00022030126,0.0033461908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004078088,0.000031516258,0.99528414,0.0000054096076,0.000019257363,0.0000013114951,0.0005346524,0.000021533213,0.0008786343,0.0000030100111,0.0031126256,0.00006712385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002362142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035426037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024374567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000705858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000023219009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3570868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035931222","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9095-9","title":"How resilient are Andean montane forest bird communities to habitat degradation?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Habitat; Secondary forest; Old-growth forest; Geography; Biodiversity; Cloud forest; Foraging; Ordination; Habitat destruction; Agroforestry; Biology; Montane ecology","score_opus":0.015198837234656943,"score_gpt":0.18517527537633582,"score_spread":0.16997643814167887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035931222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859674,0.000024715144,0.00041234796,0.013037235,0.000039425777,0.00011564395,0.00001618339,0.000038886672,0.0003481693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979031,0.000016050983,0.00044877594,0.0009216512,0.000005526014,0.000004242558,0.000033992685,0.0000015346993,0.00066511723],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996427,0.000033257948,0.00005850018,0.000096341064,0.0000807145,0.00008844435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979085,0.00004561545,0.000048819908,0.00007335872,0.000014721905,0.000026609832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007297023,0.00006202919,0.00006390416,0.000030139854,0.00052033766,0.00003826309,0.000060999042,0.00003748444,0.000016091244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012174109,0.00006273119,0.000013778659,0.00009120342,0.0001511847,0.00019638646,0.000101046884,0.00003862994,0.00006631906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016689235,0.00002354469,0.99107593,0.0000037304992,0.0000038475782,0.000001564545,0.00024214634,0.000114329014,0.00004650509,0.00035515608,0.008015182,0.00010138785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018337164,0.000035851463,0.9942706,0.0000033674532,0.000011497467,0.00000127271,0.0018832125,0.00048900855,0.000018865429,0.00073649536,0.002287701,0.000078714394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040445537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19986619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19582163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004721732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000024753608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81473416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036670093","doi":"10.1023/b:bioc.0000018152.11643.9c","title":"A collaborative GIS method for integrating local and technical knowledge in establishing biodiversity conservation priorities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Structuring; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Measurement of biodiversity; Identification (biology); Environmental planning; Computer science; Framing (construction); Geographic information system; Business; Biodiversity conservation; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.028997995782689117,"score_gpt":0.26092347601609933,"score_spread":0.23192548023341023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036670093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9717941,0.0000753042,0.020476269,0.0062156706,0.000048199945,0.0003571526,0.00030968065,0.0000419133,0.0006816819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98475283,0.00018378753,0.012744755,0.0019413069,0.000010177005,0.00002330187,0.0002898548,0.0000032593257,0.000050742477],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993515,0.000048770275,0.00012327719,0.00024276506,0.000093120376,0.00014057376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996395,0.0001327081,0.000067368725,0.000056970963,0.000048891947,0.00005455891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033806814,0.00009874362,0.00012358774,0.00004804276,0.0003421806,0.000077078534,0.00006681208,0.00010576164,0.00017539323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000111893336,0.000105105384,0.00002077586,0.0003105377,0.00030153018,0.00047322875,0.00014542094,0.00008200053,0.00001981995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032421274,0.00019393345,0.953774,0.000090907175,0.000017353641,0.0000066139414,0.0051038167,0.000022034083,0.0053174645,0.010278436,0.019348348,0.005522881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025323373,0.00016505831,0.93340117,0.000045088305,0.000040731917,0.000009592786,0.034687247,0.0008712409,0.0015023157,0.00085818616,0.025571542,0.0003155015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004940144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015188952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02958343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044282075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028940352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8475792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036936216","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0138-5","title":"The intersection of conservation and horticulture: bird-pollinated Lotus species from the Canary Islands (Leguminosae)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología; Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria","keywords":"Endangered species; Conservation status; Biology; Lotus; Biodiversity; Ex situ conservation; Critically endangered; Agroforestry; In situ conservation; Cutting; Ecology; Geography; Genetic diversity; Botany; Habitat; Population","score_opus":0.019587496536304084,"score_gpt":0.169588169847985,"score_spread":0.1500006733116809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036936216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976952,0.00037431635,0.000039066992,0.0014302416,0.00006364712,0.00008036677,0.00015123707,0.0000093061235,0.00015660211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998791,0.0004897825,0.000038804657,0.0004039828,0.000035660574,0.0000015176093,0.00012679675,0.0000017747159,0.00011070201],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956894,0.00004461876,0.00010447351,0.00014464611,0.00006081127,0.000076501754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964845,0.00004672821,0.00009417871,0.00010959632,0.000076731754,0.000024334253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011154337,0.000079544945,0.000064152904,0.00000679176,0.00026698722,0.000020061345,0.00008594128,0.00010148028,0.000007288832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006144258,0.00005067896,0.000025597883,0.000052017152,0.00024575586,0.0000087846065,0.00006250333,0.00004426438,0.0000012145148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053398445,0.00002884727,0.46941632,0.000012475205,0.00011747256,0.0000015288284,0.0006356729,6.210377e-8,0.51571244,0.00011883384,0.012643168,0.0007792193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002272356,0.000070156595,0.6161403,0.000012020617,0.000058950434,0.000006108396,0.0015298304,0.00003855164,0.37297982,0.000059583886,0.008789913,0.00008750761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002750117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021087653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.146724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006103243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024570896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41573727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039017681","doi":"10.1007/s10531-009-9719-y","title":"Decomposing logs increase oribatid mite assemblage diversity in mixedwood boreal forest","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Species richness; Coarse woody debris; Biodiversity; Forest floor; Litter; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Habitat; Species diversity; Mite; Geography; Forestry; Snag; Environmental science; Taiga; Biology; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.02717699361342302,"score_gpt":0.20253725752330123,"score_spread":0.17536026390987822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039017681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917908,0.00006443189,0.0000018465824,0.0073303073,0.00005476374,0.00013490157,0.000058033344,0.000043991076,0.0005209701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978867,0.00009861167,0.00005943809,0.0017551022,0.000024224786,4.4981138e-7,0.00014554254,1.1567775e-7,0.000029813425],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992671,0.00006590856,0.00010599741,0.00024414866,0.00011060631,0.00020622122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996671,0.00010947927,0.00006718507,0.000033187524,0.000053751108,0.00006931392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018128085,0.000116979645,0.00014986159,0.000030303532,0.00091199914,0.00003541527,0.00014326064,0.00013060459,0.00002414802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036795616,0.000064820524,0.00004629192,0.00022360013,0.000108043125,0.0002747003,0.00024608368,0.00009861741,0.000026721558],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012467247,0.00009686946,0.9926403,0.0000033456156,0.000009277356,0.000022413004,0.00019144101,4.7319472e-7,0.0005449118,0.00023717039,0.0023535404,0.003775574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038209936,0.00021168987,0.99642813,0.000009100174,0.000023445828,0.000003390353,0.00048125235,0.00003654598,0.00008693018,0.0005895006,0.0016020269,0.00014590818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004501881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01648715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0119852675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003938437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000056901317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9200216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041011231","doi":"10.1023/b:bioc.0000029331.92656.de","title":"Biodiversity associated with an irrigated rice agro-ecosystem in Sri Lanka","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Agricultural Systems and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":232,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka; University of Waterloo; University of Canterbury; Smithsonian Institution; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Fauna; Ecosystem; Invertebrate; Ecology; Biology; Paddy field; Ecological succession; Flora (microbiology); Biota; Agroforestry","score_opus":0.02943933493505762,"score_gpt":0.18497399006772758,"score_spread":0.15553465513266995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041011231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99570334,0.00003198485,3.8124233e-7,0.0036455514,0.00003386395,0.00017665797,0.00019990427,0.000062479296,0.00014585823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992145,0.000019023972,0.00001570025,0.00037444205,0.000018328225,0.0000014602963,0.00034273724,1.1920213e-7,0.00001373455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992636,0.00010768395,0.00010673586,0.00022703243,0.00014468486,0.00015028128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959505,0.000074991854,0.00013657764,0.000028461947,0.00008752102,0.00007738351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021072025,0.00010617655,0.00013155723,0.000013643512,0.00035177957,0.00007906314,0.00010431862,0.00011539971,0.00002351562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023495391,0.000042918975,0.000021782567,0.00035296683,0.000033918022,0.00061621063,0.000035441357,0.0000850288,0.00003199174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018105812,0.00017907363,0.9888709,0.000013595484,0.000037332862,0.000032581684,0.0010190003,0.000008881076,0.00868494,0.000081238824,0.00033790802,0.00055345846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000497244,0.00025114213,0.9942755,0.00003348583,0.000024601582,0.000006419448,0.002786698,0.000010038922,0.00024185916,0.000027603906,0.0016831729,0.00016224824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016178915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033319794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017140877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006316782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008528446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9903724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041109427","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9108-8","title":"Global diversity and distribution of macrofungi","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":305,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Taxonomic rank; Endemism; Geography; Biodiversity hotspot; Biogeography; Global biodiversity; Taxon","score_opus":0.012862810583642683,"score_gpt":0.17102395969676687,"score_spread":0.15816114911312418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041109427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957387,0.00015959879,0.000016419282,0.00076652894,0.00003469501,0.000041030158,0.0030089205,0.000012552401,0.00022159323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984991,0.0001415176,0.000008295454,0.00007156831,0.00001418561,1.5917801e-7,0.0012365966,2.6640326e-8,0.000028576334],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997649,0.000014243626,0.00004754373,0.000075665695,0.00004909922,0.000048539572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981,0.000091956674,0.000034425946,0.000010245772,0.000034220793,0.000019182911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000037545087,0.00003528485,0.000047372487,0.0000024415097,0.00038609587,0.000009750196,0.000027509823,0.000035876907,0.00009292421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000100257075,0.000017948314,0.000015311574,0.00007882662,0.000013286469,0.00008672735,0.00010502739,0.000015610123,0.0000075669905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004194361,0.0000147407,0.9888744,0.0000033908868,0.0000027287351,6.0391807e-7,0.000009320715,2.255595e-7,0.0011196592,0.0023058918,0.0064442237,0.0011828769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034601173,0.000035956753,0.98721,0.000004645688,0.000013281761,0.0000044067697,0.000063008585,0.00004077747,0.00012669443,0.00077186053,0.011653654,0.000041155436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018750126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008166631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017933462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007931651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000011519886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9877841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041772756","doi":"10.1007/s10531-015-0919-3","title":"Characteristics for evaluating the conservation value of species hybrids","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Hybrid; Biodiversity; Endangered species; Taxon; Biology; Ecology; Conservation genetics; Geography; Habitat; Genetics","score_opus":0.22576679785539794,"score_gpt":0.24927084637681413,"score_spread":0.023504048521416188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041772756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99227154,0.00005221836,0.000009778565,0.007225915,0.000035346915,0.000121370475,0.00019651222,0.000010275279,0.000077060686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990501,0.000045939192,0.00008952631,0.00058961025,0.00004579033,0.000002369227,0.00007836082,9.59929e-8,0.00009821551],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967873,0.000024551422,0.000079818994,0.00007053055,0.00008788555,0.00005847473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995764,0.000169491,0.000079773235,0.000009017877,0.00014728273,0.000018066721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027320464,0.000042107007,0.000070710536,0.000003246865,0.00022555297,0.000020415882,0.0000527574,0.000022134107,0.000005412064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013727524,0.000016161583,0.000021001702,0.00005772481,0.000068192225,0.000061816274,0.000034447417,0.000018592207,0.00000229005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021518063,0.000022468777,0.93649364,0.000013337197,0.000016257449,2.2620725e-7,0.00030729515,3.0579267e-7,0.04517503,0.0023301716,0.010072147,0.0053539686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012825374,0.0002208382,0.9790636,0.0000065767586,0.000021795895,7.319078e-7,0.0007006562,0.00063295575,0.00059475744,0.00029618506,0.018287128,0.000046537898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033411963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018755079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044580273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000064563105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000066764514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17347938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042934267","doi":"10.1007/s10531-014-0672-z","title":"RETRACTED ARTICLE: Molecular taxonomic tools provide more accurate estimates of species richness at less cost than traditional morphology-based taxonomic practices in a vegetation survey","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":true,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Taxonomic rank; Biodiversity; Taxonomy (biology); DNA barcoding; Plant identification; Biology; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Taxon; Geography; Botany","score_opus":0.09480767016860035,"score_gpt":0.23601711047313556,"score_spread":0.1412094403045352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042934267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979817,0.0000190921,0.00030152206,0.00090073154,0.000041868276,0.0003784919,0.00022662902,0.000017320837,0.00013261715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971955,0.000018236236,0.0021731318,0.00030695842,0.000003977879,0.0000118822345,0.00027691395,0.0000025601646,0.000010860713],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990125,0.00015449077,0.00019086669,0.00030726494,0.00018167288,0.00015322548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999026,0.00038075505,0.00040686736,0.00012595333,0.000015083242,0.000045330187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040681055,0.00013497601,0.00017378376,0.00005602854,0.0002012147,0.000031457428,0.0001366528,0.00010551994,0.00007664363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029057296,0.00014901602,0.00003071432,0.00015005078,0.0005650399,0.0005347253,0.00014673492,0.00010129564,0.00006410273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001798089,0.00010202276,0.9706418,0.000023833509,0.00001628608,0.000003777913,0.00012148121,0.0009315247,0.027228717,0.000018585333,0.0005617402,0.00017046099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007306205,0.00005699434,0.9812884,0.0000145772765,0.000037187052,0.0000017815073,0.00020576057,0.0032635913,0.014009792,0.000023190762,0.00021317115,0.0001549371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016323706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010820382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0132189235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002496448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008163379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6076697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043056067","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0142-9","title":"Environmental correlates of plant and invertebrate species richness in ponds","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"LIFE programme; European Commission; Government of Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Invertebrate; Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Odonata; Taxon; Habitat; Species diversity; Generalist and specialist species","score_opus":0.0214269250832378,"score_gpt":0.1510089924760397,"score_spread":0.1295820673928019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043056067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99894726,0.000022084228,0.0000056896106,0.0001367923,0.000037497506,0.00006297153,0.00007955427,0.000006587818,0.0007015575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999442,0.00010304414,0.00006506566,0.00027348334,0.0000011649955,4.731831e-7,0.000024635649,8.5347574e-7,0.00008928723],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959844,0.000025701695,0.00008074994,0.0001406776,0.000058828507,0.00009556998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99985737,0.000013254966,0.00004497424,0.00004809802,0.000001495719,0.000034811077],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000781939,0.00006278069,0.00008775411,0.0000392025,0.00008561445,0.0000053739113,0.00006262939,0.000060489714,0.0011085243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000036271392,0.000064949236,0.0000108154,0.0000592353,0.00040615982,0.00023330671,0.00018571872,0.00004455453,0.000079733465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006911979,0.00004459976,0.99463224,0.000006586027,0.0000051200655,0.000009571526,0.0021934402,9.607725e-7,0.00176589,0.00014699023,0.0010490271,0.000076434524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037955,0.00006450529,0.9953791,0.0000032659286,0.000012251144,0.0000046730893,0.0010387534,0.0007614972,0.0015127085,0.00028109594,0.00048287775,0.000079727215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012105124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010422448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0011546869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002513102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000023396046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045393223","doi":"10.1007/s10531-008-9447-8","title":"Diatoms: unicellular surrogates for macroalgal community structure in streams?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Diatom; Species richness; Taxon; STREAMS; Ecology; Biodiversity; Latitude; Community structure; Biology; Canonical correspondence analysis; Geography","score_opus":0.022052125106387356,"score_gpt":0.18152392768077819,"score_spread":0.15947180257439084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045393223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988048,0.00001541736,0.0000183509,0.0006863003,0.000045994486,0.0001484231,0.00015651083,0.000018148061,0.00010606003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880964,0.000024448958,0.00020913563,0.0006926939,0.000003876505,0.000001180454,0.00016563512,0.0000013374623,0.00009203043],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950546,0.00007930926,0.00007413005,0.00012999834,0.000063691834,0.00014739166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999759,0.00005967538,0.000036708105,0.000091927854,0.00000937218,0.00004327203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011165007,0.00007591926,0.000092909824,0.000030416466,0.00056565733,0.000011167497,0.00012733991,0.00008808025,0.00039824683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018049162,0.00008178987,0.0000221283,0.000098239325,0.00029066234,0.00024030679,0.00016617814,0.0001072593,0.000056949568],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006836408,0.00004324087,0.99125403,0.000010228634,0.0000057048924,0.0000062875097,0.0012558502,0.000029001065,0.0010051808,0.00003212131,0.0060720025,0.00021800566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010201043,0.00007607016,0.98830277,0.0000029928165,0.000012579801,0.0000076149345,0.00090828544,0.0014987907,0.0020694279,0.00062406814,0.005336242,0.0001410583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0115497345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020832004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009282269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061853716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007974785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99703526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046213438","doi":"10.1007/s10531-005-4052-6","title":"Using satellite imagery to assess breeding habitat availability of the endangered loggerhead shrike in Qu�bec","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Shrike; Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Endangered species; Range (aeronautics); Grassland; Biodiversity; Vegetation (pathology); Pasture; Biology; Forestry","score_opus":0.05943289648098383,"score_gpt":0.2514700465787694,"score_spread":0.1920371500977856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046213438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954269,0.00002761295,0.00014560902,0.0038362266,0.000051744508,0.00012362981,0.000011121946,0.0000061954734,0.0003709956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732167,0.000021879103,0.001723384,0.00088318717,0.0000044444782,0.0000010825556,0.0000018542535,8.046908e-7,0.000041692587],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953246,0.000054444834,0.00010543492,0.00013781073,0.00007923361,0.000090623216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997507,0.000078784666,0.000060732276,0.00007412664,0.000014945623,0.000020714058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000271316,0.00005290584,0.000079720645,0.000025539626,0.0001791026,0.000008040152,0.0000721349,0.000042474378,0.000046644902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006172534,0.000047082358,0.000018217119,0.00015842228,0.00020537806,0.00015639616,0.00015666551,0.000051194707,0.0000236898],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016724256,0.000024965066,0.9899789,0.000007084831,0.0000035367586,2.85049e-7,0.00076232414,0.00018422154,0.0073554413,0.00003641986,0.00014846864,0.0014816151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013515826,0.0000138092355,0.9968441,0.000007524311,0.000008577346,6.954657e-7,0.00021567069,0.0013796606,0.0007558591,0.000086539134,0.0004991437,0.000053236232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076401647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017724572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016960554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011011149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008571954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9890727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048881972","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0219-5","title":"The contribution of riffles and riverine wetlands to benthic macroinvertebrate biodiversity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Riffle; Species richness; Wetland; Biodiversity; Ecology; Habitat; Biomonitoring; Benthic zone; Drainage basin; Environmental science; Geography; Ecoregion; Invertebrate; Biology","score_opus":0.011366873462926873,"score_gpt":0.1845242740244347,"score_spread":0.17315740056150783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048881972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948965,0.000060734525,0.00006271801,0.0044676275,0.000117478354,0.00014887721,0.00006507822,0.000016104354,0.00016488825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835014,0.00015135604,0.00007753406,0.0013010504,0.000007635018,8.836921e-7,0.000032125634,8.121194e-7,0.000078443656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993631,0.00006053669,0.000093827344,0.0001469143,0.00011643387,0.00021918603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964005,0.00005228691,0.000067269735,0.00009094932,0.000023477618,0.00012595735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028376802,0.00008743914,0.0001052357,0.000029310379,0.00067690306,0.000024964926,0.00010991598,0.000070256414,0.00019472738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003299777,0.000074413874,0.000023518825,0.00012598073,0.0004170331,0.0003381589,0.00040093783,0.00005788266,0.00028380394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011642612,0.000026064297,0.97100824,0.000004992,0.000015393973,8.432438e-7,0.0004752303,0.0000023588202,0.0012390056,0.00029633092,0.02645317,0.0003619675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005042788,0.00008579129,0.96758157,0.0000030954898,0.00003809433,0.0000035404973,0.0003641874,0.0002128964,0.0025695064,0.00011093653,0.028415855,0.00011022441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021249123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026799308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034536656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004432324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000046685627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52062595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049522177","doi":"10.1007/s10531-009-9726-z","title":"Biodiversity and ecological forest-cover domains in boreal landscapes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Academy of Finland","keywords":"Taiga; Boreal; Ecology; Biodiversity; Habitat; Geography; Fragmentation (computing); Landscape ecology; Forest ecology; Environmental science; Ecosystem; Biology","score_opus":0.010609183636576883,"score_gpt":0.1810617360460534,"score_spread":0.17045255240947654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049522177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99641126,0.000022981625,0.000004248326,0.0024986204,0.000020149446,0.0000884097,0.000023117409,0.000018124842,0.00091306487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984293,0.00011416953,0.000052735442,0.0013621264,0.00000601074,4.272067e-7,0.000026464813,3.418402e-7,0.000008444457],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995348,0.000024949071,0.000067319634,0.00017345554,0.000080957325,0.0001185207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998366,0.000022972778,0.00003300586,0.000051776824,0.0000039123415,0.000051683084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000108532426,0.000067922716,0.000086803026,0.000025450901,0.00017059909,0.000030818614,0.000060703336,0.00007505423,0.00014093009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005168387,0.00005716207,0.000014484443,0.00008570937,0.000023567205,0.0002778452,0.00008020411,0.00004194336,0.00012715036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044624034,0.000038079335,0.99712336,0.0000046139526,0.0000023957177,0.000009986284,0.00018014578,0.000012792865,0.000024399877,0.000026503889,0.002103222,0.00042988814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005564963,0.00007385981,0.9944911,0.0000038379126,0.000010293886,0.0000029539663,0.00010314168,0.0006443604,0.000017820103,0.0002873451,0.0037229548,0.00008580839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021579547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005024792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028668374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029090077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000030135477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32621962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053737986","doi":"10.1007/s10531-012-0382-3","title":"Spatial graphs as templates for habitat networks in boreal landscapes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Academy of Finland","keywords":"Computer science; Landscape connectivity; Node (physics); Spatial network; Habitat; Boreal; Ecology; Geography; Biodiversity; Network topology; Spatial ecology; Biological dispersal; Mathematics; Biology; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.013592344047222394,"score_gpt":0.20936599933096156,"score_spread":0.19577365528373916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053737986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968087,0.00003292036,0.0006605231,0.0015675589,0.00012857484,0.00017180805,0.000010871674,0.000017998898,0.0006010428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857175,0.00003244377,0.00024601902,0.0009881567,0.000026356103,0.000011474604,0.000070167596,0.0000017499967,0.0000518626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954665,0.000022575794,0.00009452601,0.00011845153,0.000068764035,0.00014905188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997688,0.000068371664,0.00004904409,0.000055713528,0.000010136975,0.000047929156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014371792,0.0000683114,0.00006656803,0.000035627618,0.0001727318,0.00002530172,0.00004571039,0.00006167427,0.000096941694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022964456,0.000068589245,0.000025884006,0.00010434877,0.000045129393,0.00048452732,0.00004023721,0.00004719215,0.000037646034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068659865,0.00003945991,0.98754865,0.0000028790403,0.0000044300314,2.572037e-7,0.0001693245,0.000024240859,0.000063646694,0.00021935736,0.008426024,0.003433064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035920125,0.000042156895,0.98296326,0.000005667797,0.000012264959,0.000002657816,0.00025782202,0.0033850356,0.00006646549,0.0002329247,0.012581194,0.000091348134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0080326935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027279356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005304758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035019697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000429536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057866469","doi":"10.1007/s10531-013-0497-1","title":"The scientific value of the largest remaining old-growth red pine forests in North America","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; University of Guelph","funders":"Fondation de l’Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","keywords":"Biodiversity; Threatened species; Endangered species; Ecology; Geography; Disturbance (geology); Ecological succession; Climate change; Agroforestry; Forest ecology; Habitat; Old-growth forest; Ecosystem; Forestry; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.007667502161512053,"score_gpt":0.16465020543022915,"score_spread":0.1569827032687171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057866469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99595964,0.00001241488,0.000008170093,0.0034839073,0.00011027631,0.00026221387,0.0000078063695,0.000007486801,0.00014807441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995848,0.000006799776,0.000047053833,0.00023669461,0.0000034565444,0.0000041263306,0.000005576801,0.0000010569441,0.00011044659],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940735,0.000088830464,0.000096544754,0.00013407273,0.00016421385,0.00010898291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996257,0.00008397056,0.000095384756,0.00015181566,0.000020444035,0.000022696819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002600209,0.000049149803,0.000058398295,0.000016571046,0.0003981237,0.00004626247,0.00017041138,0.000023924458,0.000031027612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012627998,0.000032117114,0.000018489787,0.0003551216,0.00030907718,0.00019218831,0.00015257274,0.000049206974,0.00007205471],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051942134,0.00001149277,0.9938191,0.0000059168524,0.0000019270165,2.4128192e-7,0.00029264405,0.000014690282,0.0008066487,0.000025482863,0.00429866,0.0007179804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015014784,0.000017261767,0.9923597,0.000009638223,0.000003559158,5.002868e-7,0.00012610595,0.004941019,0.00018208048,0.000052098785,0.0021167907,0.00004109572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011215921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011339502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004926329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042338248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007463111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058053698","doi":"10.1007/s10531-008-9444-y","title":"Cultivating participatory policy processes for genetic resources policy: lessons from the Genetic Resources Policy Initiative (GRPI) project","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre; Rockefeller Foundation","keywords":"Stakeholder; Stakeholder engagement; Citizen journalism; Process (computing); Champion; Business; Political science; Public relations; Environmental resource management; Knowledge management; Process management; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09368785647589166,"score_gpt":0.27300806278181544,"score_spread":0.17932020630592377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058053698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96813136,0.00019831868,0.00016523492,0.029804152,0.000027650913,0.00072410237,0.00032684175,0.00007551329,0.00054682186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889385,0.00055020326,0.0012845923,0.0082872445,0.00035860215,0.00005162259,0.00007109784,0.000010337925,0.0004477888],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983687,0.00018128728,0.00025166548,0.00048887334,0.00032817104,0.00038133987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895775,0.00035398267,0.0002500529,0.0002561841,0.000079312056,0.00010271213],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019090828,0.00023407405,0.00019166726,0.00015953997,0.0023181224,0.00010261476,0.00037963188,0.000111539,0.00004016757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005538073,0.00019622155,0.00007402622,0.0008796656,0.00083222514,0.0002193281,0.00047372212,0.00010430897,0.000036754966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086353124,0.000064845844,0.96523684,0.000036977726,0.00005254574,0.000003722278,0.025036989,0.00006764699,0.00016190189,0.000026706926,0.007226702,0.001998764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006513575,0.00007462742,0.8844205,0.00002322763,0.00006619177,0.000003338747,0.004274033,0.00020839371,0.00010959875,0.00027981444,0.109657586,0.00023129677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05111871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021322304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10243089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020960145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022555023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060359306","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9146-2","title":"Responses of ground-active beetle assemblages to different styles of reforestation on cleared rainforest land","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Griffith University","keywords":"Reforestation; Rainforest; Ecology; Tropical rainforest; Agroforestry; Biodiversity; Clearance; Habitat; Generalist and specialist species; Afforestation; Tropics; Geography; Biology; Forestry","score_opus":0.03355754822463721,"score_gpt":0.2261084468732248,"score_spread":0.19255089864858757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060359306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975647,0.0000101326195,0.000002700885,0.0019328065,0.00003194659,0.00013204326,0.0001643357,0.000012176096,0.00014921096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956805,0.000031974665,0.000026764188,0.0002385491,0.000010661528,5.5969326e-7,0.000065148364,1.4118508e-7,0.00005812883],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952745,0.000036035915,0.000111255205,0.00011838843,0.00011033357,0.00009650648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938947,0.0003111967,0.00010159931,0.000026079551,0.00013498099,0.000036697307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016448657,0.00006891867,0.00012268104,0.000034117522,0.0002008212,0.000006923262,0.00006710017,0.000069847956,0.000021691096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011118428,0.000033018317,0.000028881264,0.00015202333,0.00012038338,0.00007572338,0.00006162695,0.000036107103,0.0000076084134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017153657,0.000080055965,0.9816102,0.0000125666475,0.000025940688,0.0000019372217,0.00045288843,0.0000011841496,0.010623022,0.00037659245,0.0005941167,0.0045061694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001846962,0.00069449266,0.9884546,0.000013326452,0.000014874921,3.4966644e-7,0.00236308,0.0000024044157,0.0074760932,0.0000650495,0.00066795456,0.000063071275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014910168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004702654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068444465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017638768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038706207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26241913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060719107","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-0549-7","title":"Quantifying the Components of Biocomplexity Along Ecological Perturbation Gradients","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Warwick","keywords":"Species evenness; Ecology; Entropy (arrow of time); Perturbation (astronomy); Biodiversity; Species diversity; Environmental science; Mathematics; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.06366659879020234,"score_gpt":0.2382609545924859,"score_spread":0.17459435580228355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060719107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99425757,0.000017811031,0.00009528127,0.0051544127,0.00003549837,0.0000909042,0.0000067327087,0.000009438576,0.0003323739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989384,0.000022939197,0.00035804365,0.00061844924,0.000004205279,0.0000013803583,0.000014011076,4.33304e-7,0.00004217434],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996467,0.00004572657,0.000083894294,0.000092691516,0.000068477326,0.00006250325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978894,0.00007454767,0.00006777644,0.00004485707,0.000009677276,0.000014186926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015148973,0.000041224983,0.000054484557,0.000015668775,0.00038385863,0.000005960487,0.000060794067,0.000034276305,0.000077336445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024884566,0.000030922496,0.00001726718,0.000077491604,0.00027563737,0.00012079631,0.00009074903,0.000037650185,0.000056175322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012446457,0.00004417082,0.9962296,0.000002758175,0.0000073595234,1.5750553e-7,0.00040793858,0.000049626193,0.00032478358,0.002093983,0.00045076717,0.0003764071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016851892,0.000019811549,0.99208635,0.0000014972504,0.0000109178245,7.918806e-7,0.00012876613,0.0058141234,0.00004982129,0.00042276486,0.0012598219,0.000036818492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025978015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011994686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057644974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027549353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000014501933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29523692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061828609","doi":"10.1007/s10531-013-0583-4","title":"Prioritizing regionally rare plant species for conservation using herbarium data","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; University of Manitoba; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Herbarium; Vascular plant; Adaptability; Biodiversity; Taxon; Resource (disambiguation); Geography; Rare species; Ranking (information retrieval); Natural resource; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Population; Hierarchy; Biology; Habitat; Computer science; Political science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.16314681339752035,"score_gpt":0.22364447020408018,"score_spread":0.06049765680655983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061828609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9795707,0.00014045276,0.00004502161,0.01913962,0.00010956165,0.00035794868,0.00054100953,0.000032266096,0.000063442574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935938,0.00017385685,0.0015679789,0.0036510245,0.00019981829,0.000012799702,0.00055261597,4.90885e-7,0.00024759962],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943376,0.000026953,0.0001113097,0.00022899952,0.00006546294,0.00013350688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949276,0.00020147985,0.000087184824,0.000051454128,0.0001321272,0.000034976983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012805317,0.000081677565,0.00011032099,0.000008219745,0.00061261625,0.000077812205,0.00013430891,0.00007261338,0.000029638084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062014435,0.000043165906,0.00002277667,0.000074838994,0.00010121504,0.00040621255,0.00014120822,0.000037685746,0.000009041724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005381176,0.000039883173,0.91976935,0.000027276843,0.000043929038,0.0000015048496,0.00003472505,2.1117576e-7,0.021875037,0.00021912949,0.05700513,0.00093002256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017569559,0.000049347876,0.9055119,0.000009338489,0.000024252367,0.0000036781494,0.0011790494,0.0010377197,0.000057520738,0.00021042478,0.091630064,0.00011097188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006101208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022270367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034624938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019022928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010988366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47118106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063630081","doi":"10.1007/s10531-015-0873-0","title":"Influence of traffic mortality on forest bird abundance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Geography; Ecology; Relative species abundance; Biodiversity; Environmental science; Collision; Traffic volume; Physical geography; Biology; Transport engineering","score_opus":0.0348309250656855,"score_gpt":0.22901573767032884,"score_spread":0.19418481260464335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063630081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983083,0.0000056671934,0.000022116154,0.0011240189,0.000039823746,0.00009073085,0.000011460879,0.00003284669,0.00036500514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989046,0.0000105864665,0.000084089996,0.0009287603,0.0000059584822,0.0000021269007,0.0000071101517,0.0000016046678,0.00005519571],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994701,0.000027921371,0.00011213797,0.00014612665,0.00016964934,0.00007407447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967664,0.000026917594,0.00009095748,0.000116488525,0.000032175143,0.00005682788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013963201,0.00006361528,0.00007093026,0.000025197074,0.000093105176,0.000014077043,0.00007479319,0.00004174912,0.000036352376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004897153,0.00006366942,0.000019294113,0.00014390766,0.00014994688,0.00036164644,0.000044141918,0.00004716741,0.00017477587],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047654838,0.000048210204,0.986028,0.0000043339546,0.0000054674365,8.172514e-7,0.00021409742,0.0082933465,0.00022607822,0.00010759771,0.0044752774,0.00054910657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024716958,0.0000873328,0.9918483,0.000010025218,0.000011527495,0.0000012525825,0.00012055482,0.002221746,0.00014962892,0.000090632144,0.0051393984,0.00007245481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003276662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011643214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060716006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051496467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014490303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49533546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063905819","doi":"10.1007/s10531-014-0641-6","title":"A continental-scale study of seed lifespan in experimental storage examining seed, plant, and environmental traits associated with longevity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Seed Germination and Physiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Longevity; Biology; Germination; Dormancy; Abiotic component; Herbaceous plant; Habit; Biodiversity; Botany; Ecology; Agronomy","score_opus":0.02363047286471146,"score_gpt":0.18690328577526724,"score_spread":0.1632728129105558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063905819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996377,0.000018669873,3.1294925e-7,0.00009229201,0.000010306238,0.0001449108,0.000059420527,0.000008985344,0.000027377475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997473,0.000002977278,0.0000027420149,0.00011094467,0.0000061811834,0.0000018910787,0.0001140412,2.0093086e-7,0.000013754312],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995412,0.00010538124,0.00007756792,0.00014018243,0.00007019006,0.00006543674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997864,0.00009170721,0.00007187252,0.000013672567,0.000006813447,0.000029536975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010826141,0.000062514104,0.00011150872,0.000012085036,0.00009624187,0.000009786882,0.00003399762,0.00004468794,0.000014131743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007829998,0.00003290286,0.0000072411344,0.000062379295,0.000069344154,0.00007803613,0.000032426284,0.000037753434,6.4452917e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009701065,0.00027107968,0.90044343,0.0000016919912,0.0000067176957,9.0188917e-7,0.0014001591,4.4693775e-7,0.09739164,0.0000020868636,0.00001332442,0.00037149806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008627532,0.0007143702,0.9866645,0.0000080324435,0.000007058816,0.0000010431421,0.010715142,0.00018438027,0.0007257169,0.0000016323033,0.00004612985,0.00006929588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050089846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009755227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09666593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001084725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000017913146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13417396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070581603","doi":"10.1007/s10531-007-9168-4","title":"Does habitat loss affect the communities of plants and insects equally in plant–pollinator interactions? Preliminary findings","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Generalist and specialist species; Habitat; Pollinator; Biodiversity; Ecology; Transect; Biology; Pollination; Niche; Habitat destruction; Plant community; Species richness; Pollen","score_opus":0.055273550870663914,"score_gpt":0.21552655392949902,"score_spread":0.1602530030588351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070581603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980521,0.00011641853,3.61409e-7,0.0015136198,0.000029064933,0.00007779384,0.0001612348,0.000008502518,0.000040867868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994469,0.0003016943,0.0000050075814,0.00018743785,0.000010553153,6.817912e-7,0.000032430897,1.004845e-7,0.0000151776185],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996924,0.000036400645,0.00007568963,0.000059993945,0.000055485714,0.00008004925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993226,0.00059538306,0.000040907988,0.000009691344,0.000015821495,0.000015584368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021194154,0.000053136988,0.00007691996,0.000014272401,0.0002824494,0.000017682165,0.000058709156,0.00003151562,0.0000059772815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014121002,0.000017557702,0.000013196121,0.000056841924,0.00012280559,0.00010470089,0.00007498577,0.00006178046,0.0000010800152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027309154,0.000022880384,0.9917867,0.000011505753,0.000007355934,0.0000037948737,0.0012567834,3.9625352e-8,0.00507055,0.000067698296,0.00024326077,0.001256326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011084461,0.00013346973,0.989828,0.000038063394,0.0000045523125,0.0000046474743,0.0077561466,0.000011659216,0.0011225569,0.000070698465,0.0008691233,0.000050246515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021669266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036693167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034526244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006183978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000016583712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9808847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071421290","doi":"10.1007/s10531-009-9707-2","title":"“Turtle watching” conservation guidelines: green turtle (Chelonia mydas) tourism in nearshore coastal environments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Turtle (robot); Habitat; Fishery; Flagship species; Tourism; Occupancy; Geography; Sea turtle; Ecology; Biodiversity; Sustainability; Home range; Range (aeronautics); Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science; Endangered species","score_opus":0.022449651759533833,"score_gpt":0.22144908380469017,"score_spread":0.19899943204515633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071421290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724129,0.000048288588,0.00028141492,0.026331624,0.00008382122,0.00023039788,0.000035000852,0.000039296185,0.00053724827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98315215,0.00011068869,0.0012187808,0.013871417,0.000041518193,0.0000053829963,0.0002611849,0.0000044340454,0.0013344542],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882585,0.0000892711,0.00027530323,0.00037238622,0.0002077841,0.00022943417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957144,0.00004156958,0.00012680508,0.00016845917,0.00001625604,0.00007544572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030157782,0.0001728753,0.00015714832,0.00005357231,0.00025451585,0.000031060634,0.00015607553,0.00020653964,0.00024277887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005176921,0.00017766327,0.000039507842,0.00018962701,0.00017177968,0.00048709617,0.00011066912,0.00015668964,0.00024742814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013847316,0.000087075234,0.9618689,0.000004654438,0.000009063467,0.000018255514,0.0004917205,0.000027716625,0.0077286395,0.0001205353,0.019249015,0.0102559775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007311314,0.0000874602,0.9624616,0.000013996008,0.000018342997,0.0000067374053,0.00022773845,0.0010833796,0.0004536863,0.0016424317,0.03305532,0.00021820517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058482424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025966198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013806303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009138453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018269331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8840832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071937514","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-7839-y","title":"Exploratory multiscale analysis of the fish assemblages and habitats of the lower St. Lawrence River, Québec, Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Habitat; Euryhaline; Electrofishing; Beta diversity; Littoral zone; Species diversity; Estuary; Indicator species; Wetland; Canonical correspondence analysis; Species richness; Geography; Environmental science; Biology; Salinity","score_opus":0.011316739461126397,"score_gpt":0.1727174972800591,"score_spread":0.1614007578189327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071937514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883965,0.000021240265,0.0000049042455,0.011232151,0.000034403805,0.00006351889,0.000039187802,0.000002158298,0.00020592369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976107,0.000052715972,0.000020118572,0.0021057841,0.0000012460843,8.792424e-7,0.000001513015,3.5183618e-7,0.00020668867],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968135,0.000033214845,0.000060285885,0.00008558215,0.00009226208,0.00004732596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999778,0.000044916807,0.00007276164,0.000083945495,0.000009744778,0.000010646199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000067331704,0.000037913782,0.000068884,0.000010454264,0.00021276766,0.0000025089837,0.00008832348,0.000019462945,0.00006427633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022024924,0.000026205335,0.000020306948,0.00015198629,0.0003644701,0.0000969242,0.00023112966,0.000025667627,8.241807e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049013515,0.000017924887,0.92004955,0.0000034424984,0.000053966425,1.3015249e-7,0.0003060295,0.00005732803,0.00004695101,0.000008163118,0.079293266,0.00015832267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009084747,0.0000073595315,0.9883877,0.0000023228674,0.0001481376,3.8437626e-8,0.00030468593,0.00020746418,0.00018844436,0.000005084634,0.010627412,0.000030499945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2797179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98510826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7053904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033543707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014630166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7250785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073843702","doi":"10.1007/s10531-014-0851-y","title":"Tree diversity on sustainably certified and conventional coffee farms in Central America","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian AIDS Treatment Information Exchange","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Species richness; Biodiversity; Agroforestry; Rainforest; Sustainability; Ecology; Geography; Species diversity; Biology","score_opus":0.05074131968455836,"score_gpt":0.22910259496995675,"score_spread":0.17836127528539839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073843702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99013776,0.00002722053,0.000025263493,0.007172589,0.000113844886,0.0001930165,0.000015559144,0.000036589103,0.0022781522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971772,0.0000124738535,0.000009895738,0.0026239299,0.00006129681,7.671946e-7,0.00005775418,0.0000016376536,0.000055042023],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930423,0.000022667107,0.00009525028,0.00019021567,0.00017518646,0.00021245333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965835,0.000024164123,0.00007197014,0.00005888481,0.0001487561,0.000037895574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014482712,0.00010175215,0.00012301322,0.00010596936,0.00033242142,0.0001244306,0.000074389005,0.00006591415,0.000015130869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013571551,0.00010715958,0.000030961477,0.00022195888,0.00016369407,0.000617037,0.00020063527,0.00007427515,0.000013063257],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027369097,0.00009572594,0.9891625,0.000050551138,0.000010810983,0.000014002331,0.001083642,0.0000049301198,0.0000023961577,0.0041701077,0.004017703,0.0011139478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013120795,0.00003225389,0.96361303,0.0000078244775,0.00003373084,3.126182e-7,0.020964839,0.00040026518,0.0000014152015,0.004541564,0.008957337,0.0001353376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016811805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066667673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02554945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011033321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037056754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076704244","doi":"10.1007/s10531-012-0400-5","title":"Short-term effects of reduced white-tailed deer density on insect communities in a strongly overbrowsed boreal forest ecosystem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Center for Northern Studies; Université Laval; Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université Laval","keywords":"Biology; Odocoileus; Ecology; Biodiversity; Fauna; Insect; Abundance (ecology); Herbivore; Lepidoptera genitalia","score_opus":0.02041006958996348,"score_gpt":0.1982289968314524,"score_spread":0.17781892724148893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076704244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989924,0.000012364915,0.000022210632,0.00019845688,0.00010416331,0.00026364118,0.000013024301,0.000018340417,0.00037539843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960303,0.000013974927,0.00004354371,0.00023453851,0.000010696955,0.000007670046,0.00006747162,0.000002210088,0.000016883898],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926215,0.00017758565,0.00014720288,0.00011268558,0.00012441602,0.00017593973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954355,0.00016616298,0.00008134677,0.00014186493,0.000013950369,0.000053136773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002641645,0.00010293076,0.00014753846,0.00005638392,0.00016256885,0.00001015379,0.00009335918,0.00011912072,0.000038365048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033005443,0.00010694312,0.000028824132,0.00011924158,0.00011989559,0.00035187101,0.0000969929,0.000105083105,0.000026935952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016645083,0.00012273554,0.99717754,0.000045122164,0.000011260453,0.0000017696368,0.0011247284,0.000022707709,0.00037930484,0.000107088636,0.0006100232,0.00023127241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055640494,0.000100395315,0.9979498,0.00003807438,0.000023625704,0.0000018236158,0.00030965175,0.00032158566,0.0005098809,0.000016827964,0.00006616591,0.00010581032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012943458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01058709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009292744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010978949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009811784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59078443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077080009","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9055-4","title":"Conservation planning with irreplaceability: does the method matter?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Plan (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Biodiversity; Ecology; Protected area; Computer science; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.010422112497795299,"score_gpt":0.19233039305649496,"score_spread":0.18190828055869968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077080009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725497,0.000017486776,0.002397992,0.022290854,0.000050935407,0.0003010643,0.000018221088,0.000051777064,0.0023220167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871653,0.0000071291583,0.0029212786,0.0076962197,0.000030143729,0.000009269487,0.000087340275,0.0000047712347,0.0020785495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904096,0.00011250444,0.00013065827,0.00030582614,0.0002496085,0.0001604534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995142,0.00011564003,0.00011437586,0.0001976417,0.000022438706,0.00003569391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038582578,0.00012869411,0.000099516874,0.000035206314,0.00084228476,0.00009694923,0.00014927449,0.000056044588,0.00044102356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000096136355,0.00008124858,0.000029700159,0.00022096102,0.00030647713,0.00024193357,0.00019966342,0.000078076024,0.0001321881],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005859822,0.000030584073,0.98504764,0.000012274806,0.000013740904,0.0000029311307,0.00043601275,0.00014335415,0.00013537247,0.0000391729,0.013595157,0.0004851924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037566657,0.000026213766,0.9331286,0.00000749242,0.00005914988,0.0000033691445,0.0011605897,0.00090371276,0.00011095337,0.00027363934,0.063811965,0.00013865205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012218046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001388859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051919013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071492665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008717022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077116226","doi":"10.1007/s10531-010-9852-7","title":"Intra-specific niche partitioning obscures the importance of fine-scale habitat data in species distribution models","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University; Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Riparian zone; Elevation (ballistics); Niche; Ecology; Land cover; Geography; Environmental niche modelling; Scale (ratio); Physical geography; Geographic information system; Field (mathematics); Ecological niche; Biodiversity; Environmental science; Species distribution; Land use; Cartography; Biology","score_opus":0.037659164949990484,"score_gpt":0.20808594996592858,"score_spread":0.1704267850159381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077116226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914071,0.000031007796,0.0005395421,0.007510916,0.00008659476,0.00011102213,0.00013143377,0.000010569774,0.00017181302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884856,0.00005290092,0.00030512965,0.0003914264,0.000013325651,0.0000030623785,0.0003538647,9.70193e-7,0.000030753996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943805,0.000039832037,0.00013869746,0.00018605648,0.00010371238,0.00009367493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953985,0.00008824638,0.000091746326,0.0002463513,0.000014108558,0.000019700912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035462997,0.000058410344,0.00006990563,0.000011704566,0.00021040138,0.000017875658,0.00019597012,0.00006942717,0.00017267888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005228542,0.00005049192,0.000012627961,0.00014625989,0.00035531752,0.0004986612,0.00017447745,0.0001261674,0.000017719798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023624078,0.00002651436,0.98304975,0.0000028174675,0.000002385066,5.780675e-7,0.00017537765,0.00004926403,0.00076273934,0.0011006237,0.014548872,0.0002574424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017780157,0.000010798122,0.9897776,0.0000037963805,0.0000078103685,0.0000012878995,0.0001731725,0.0037919602,0.00019555593,0.0015719683,0.004229375,0.00005886876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003880934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016568594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0161805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020060517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010350739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92456645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077275506","doi":"10.1007/s10531-009-9619-1","title":"Capacity of large-scale, long-term biodiversity monitoring programmes to detect trends in species prevalence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Scale (ratio); Environmental resource management; Global biodiversity; Geography; Environmental monitoring; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Cartography","score_opus":0.025179915394118953,"score_gpt":0.23327885103194632,"score_spread":0.20809893563782736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077275506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982234,0.00002606806,0.00016251118,0.0012345948,0.00004227903,0.00010106793,0.000030103229,0.00001648241,0.0001634502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884623,0.00007372329,0.0007963641,0.00016011848,0.0000038323915,0.0000011554919,0.0000058984892,3.9188575e-7,0.00011225925],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994627,0.000031655654,0.00009529428,0.0001774352,0.00009823419,0.00013463419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980086,0.000021148966,0.00005623732,0.000068520574,0.000015214854,0.000038020262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014578954,0.00007176765,0.00009939019,0.000074056225,0.00019119451,0.000009315189,0.00008651447,0.000055119363,0.0000756932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016523825,0.00007697443,0.00002455976,0.00025421323,0.00019689837,0.00018620936,0.00009276057,0.000054616023,0.000025404375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033506825,0.00004915654,0.99485904,0.0000118265725,0.0000043260343,0.0000017942353,0.0012372545,0.000014858392,0.0006208537,0.000013393624,0.00015590359,0.0029980831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025308577,0.000096940625,0.99852514,0.000010907685,0.0000144961905,5.096539e-7,0.00015894507,0.00003103319,0.00072898064,0.00004011874,0.000059185684,0.00008064452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013447911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013694727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036661094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058364185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000023833572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3138926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077911564","doi":"10.1007/s10531-008-9473-6","title":"Assessing the extent and diversity of riparian ecosystems in Sonora, Mexico","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Archaeology and Natural History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Commission for Environmental Cooperation; Sonoran Joint Venture","keywords":"Riparian zone; Tamarix; Geography; Riparian forest; Ecology; Species richness; Biodiversity; Understory; Willow; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Forestry; Agroforestry; Habitat; Canopy; Biology","score_opus":0.06072260952652995,"score_gpt":0.2659987762025161,"score_spread":0.20527616667598617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077911564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953073,0.00060407474,0.00002285201,0.0034363046,0.00007667181,0.00007313537,0.0000035981507,0.000006797616,0.0004692599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99909633,0.000568254,0.000057911362,0.0002091145,0.000008431866,2.66695e-7,0.000002005456,2.673021e-7,0.000057410187],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995806,0.0001461031,0.00005397732,0.00007489632,0.00007940176,0.0000649904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997718,0.00008750401,0.000053271255,0.000033719763,0.00003138613,0.000022348353],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035817514,0.000029264795,0.000061005267,0.0000343638,0.0014092742,0.0000022820443,0.000060201135,0.00005916351,0.000009452766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037032765,0.000025337702,0.00001177014,0.00007660552,0.00069662434,0.0002407188,0.00010742433,0.000056871257,0.0000015704044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011508774,0.000008069378,0.98081404,0.00000419606,0.0000033735398,0.0000028464583,0.016578773,1.8947888e-7,0.000014054517,0.00095749216,0.0010206202,0.0005848382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017761474,0.0000090566255,0.9860054,0.0000063069524,0.000007151573,0.0000012334984,0.0043840967,0.000038690534,0.000013087039,0.0004690568,0.008851902,0.000036367714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019615754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011645997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012194676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030520332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038806895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078792541","doi":"10.1007/s10531-014-0843-y","title":"Commonness and rarity determinants of woody plants in different types of tropical forests","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Ecology; Geography; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Habit; Biology","score_opus":0.049764102583851395,"score_gpt":0.19485552352998234,"score_spread":0.14509142094613095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078792541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99962044,0.00004258231,3.6877478e-7,0.00023579219,0.0000069094885,0.00003166868,0.00004382155,0.0000025522756,0.000015879894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99989855,0.000060379723,0.0000034342368,0.00002339125,0.0000058208207,2.368412e-7,0.0000055440637,3.7992507e-8,0.000002619966],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978197,0.00002130782,0.00006025226,0.000056679208,0.000037517017,0.000042265558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99985003,0.00008378968,0.00003667427,0.000005666287,0.000010886697,0.00001292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000033114262,0.000033550088,0.000103093844,0.000005183984,0.000046558725,0.0000034815605,0.000028921166,0.00002882946,0.0000030227118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012647304,0.000013838811,0.00000894536,0.000024624416,0.000055392393,0.000029828476,0.000039203933,0.000016850496,2.8611467e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058654303,0.000023634555,0.9920307,0.00001148018,0.0000018575528,2.9065444e-7,0.000045989946,1.513068e-8,0.0033740762,0.00005856594,0.00003111132,0.0043636374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013445692,0.000091402806,0.9981273,0.000016495123,0.0000038446915,4.7299682e-7,0.00008259882,0.000086673404,0.0011758739,0.0001297083,0.0001209645,0.000030235764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066772575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014288701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013620975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000014543749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":5.725992e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7973431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081799559","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-9666-6","title":"Rare plants at the extremes of distribution: broadly and narrowly distributed rare species","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Commission for Environmental Cooperation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Endemism; Rare species; Eudicots; Biology; Shrub; Ecology; Habitat; Biodiversity; Herbaceous plant; Taxonomy (biology)","score_opus":0.04053684950276748,"score_gpt":0.18655690415691656,"score_spread":0.14602005465414908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081799559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98054236,0.0007976911,0.0000022028323,0.016764654,0.000034394976,0.000094100375,0.001671623,0.000014316545,0.0000786562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883616,0.00043106737,0.00000725624,0.00026069436,0.000041403764,0.0000017613344,0.00017525912,9.225976e-8,0.0002462785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999603,0.000032279968,0.000086531734,0.00012434773,0.00006214523,0.000091751666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997127,0.00011609818,0.00007030757,0.0000254851,0.00004841888,0.000027010754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000707627,0.00006736423,0.00009577775,0.0000027211213,0.00058488187,0.000019148649,0.000059745664,0.00005199084,0.000114257135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002378489,0.000027508897,0.000024348876,0.00006431637,0.00024849063,0.0000938469,0.000102206846,0.000033618297,0.000006467812],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006636642,0.000023884317,0.96564496,0.000005601,0.000018801897,9.930177e-7,0.00004732716,2.0649533e-7,0.0017091994,0.0000362694,0.030347414,0.0020989755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001278297,0.000039964718,0.8387634,0.0000043982345,0.000012377896,0.0000034239936,0.0011997679,0.0000077408995,0.00047224484,0.000018165498,0.15929696,0.000053694752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052829506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031646588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12894954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019070067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000028627337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44984975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083118641","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0092-2","title":"Bryophyte species richness and composition in young forests regenerated after clear-cut logging versus after wildfire and spruce budworm outbreak","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Kungl. Skogs- och Lantbruksakademien","keywords":"Species richness; Bryophyte; Coarse woody debris; Biodiversity; Ecology; Logging; Disturbance (geology); Clearcutting; Deciduous; Secondary forest; Understory; Biology; Habitat; Forestry; Canopy; Geography","score_opus":0.029190640331887438,"score_gpt":0.18269522928600446,"score_spread":0.153504588954117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083118641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99810207,0.00023563948,5.456548e-7,0.0012145384,0.00011736966,0.00012466624,0.000060714145,0.000025579593,0.000118878954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993304,0.00024565318,0.000038966587,0.00027466126,0.000024825898,0.0000036888366,0.00003590908,2.941197e-7,0.000045626526],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994161,0.000041852927,0.00008992893,0.00023521885,0.000065132095,0.00015174526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980414,0.000044362063,0.000047954407,0.000026040781,0.00003250375,0.000044989156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000880072,0.00011183385,0.00012395575,0.000025633686,0.00034685273,0.00003877856,0.000047130205,0.0001159041,0.00003913117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007962232,0.000063593216,0.000019489533,0.00011591274,0.00027164593,0.00027047348,0.00014567126,0.00007396771,0.0000095873675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013580009,0.000029965355,0.9969965,0.00001032655,0.000015673824,0.000020997757,0.00062544685,3.693237e-8,0.00032086894,0.000040832278,0.00016220425,0.00041913317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048301232,0.00018024107,0.9977253,0.000017396918,0.00003106827,0.0000054397246,0.0008337676,0.000019304258,0.00014425421,0.000064578286,0.00035443495,0.00014121048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013566024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015462812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014106209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018867215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000026417633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8628612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084501654","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9035-8","title":"GIS-Based Multicriteria Evaluation and Fuzzy Sets to Identify Priority Sites for Marine Protection","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Marine protected area; Environmental resource management; Marine spatial planning; Marine conservation; Stakeholder; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Decision support system; Business; Scale (ratio); Exclusive economic zone; Environmental planning; Resource (disambiguation); Operations research; Geography; Environmental science; Engineering; Habitat; Fishery; Ecology; Data mining","score_opus":0.04025142147613422,"score_gpt":0.2647359422653353,"score_spread":0.2244845207892011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084501654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959155,0.000009282275,0.0003957533,0.002639916,0.00006030028,0.0008109082,0.000027304197,0.000022585888,0.00011848142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986703,0.0000024762885,0.00093167345,0.00018641588,0.000015301508,0.00003763926,0.00006318058,0.0000011636525,0.000091892856],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995358,0.000027172217,0.000078376244,0.00017626812,0.000105252824,0.00007715338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982876,0.0000203693,0.00004085503,0.00004738413,0.000037243924,0.000025415775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023622348,0.0000623184,0.00006446975,0.000024407074,0.00027894712,0.000036565896,0.000024091509,0.000030562154,0.00004634379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042531672,0.0000623748,0.00001385504,0.000072240764,0.00003434343,0.00014936214,0.000115948664,0.000018564102,0.000020581012],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009141211,0.000031502525,0.9686529,0.000041400224,0.000003980847,2.389622e-7,0.0000797837,0.000008840719,0.0127267875,0.000014209292,0.0036382258,0.014710696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005275345,0.00006415308,0.9882906,0.0000046929354,0.000028915829,5.9612273e-7,0.00003750594,0.005355801,0.0005853129,0.00051444705,0.0045075268,0.000082918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060962206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004399217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019637674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058515805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000042434694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92157024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084682002","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0223-9","title":"Temporal dynamics of aquatic communities and implications for pond conservation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Macrophyte; Species richness; Biodiversity; Invertebrate; Beta diversity; Alpha diversity; Habitat; Gamma diversity; Species diversity; Ecological succession; Biology; Global biodiversity","score_opus":0.03384944027860902,"score_gpt":0.2099424222355877,"score_spread":0.1760929819569787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084682002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99200666,0.000025931087,0.0010041118,0.0064710327,0.000036505982,0.00015814285,0.00015422123,0.000011022257,0.00013238745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99725956,0.000020736225,0.0012483865,0.0011122159,0.0000036618178,0.000003186155,0.0002860532,0.0000011653572,0.00006501967],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968606,0.000029926498,0.00008161748,0.000062643194,0.000036603433,0.00010315099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972755,0.00008133568,0.00006799703,0.00006927146,0.00001261208,0.000041236937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015439044,0.000052751715,0.00007697009,0.000025879952,0.000285218,0.000011177399,0.00005745619,0.000053025626,0.00008769666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001237456,0.000057855403,0.000014855266,0.000057850237,0.00030907991,0.0003505307,0.00010492814,0.000028205728,0.0000129035425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027326249,0.00003190169,0.99084336,0.000018231567,0.000008138862,2.4967672e-8,0.00095895195,8.0944267e-7,0.00019464125,0.0020754812,0.0054933554,0.0003477591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040106173,0.00006712855,0.98868966,0.0000034149482,0.000040593357,0.0000026390373,0.0023974155,0.004084842,0.00015008499,0.0014046619,0.0026685235,0.0000900011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055304365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076035033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005358817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035435314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000048992033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83604026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091554197","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9060-7","title":"Conservation of Aquatic Resources through the Use of Freshwater Protected Areas: Opportunities and Challenges","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Freshwater ecosystem; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Terminology; Environmental planning; Aquatic ecosystem; Freshwater fish; Business; Ecosystem; Ecology; Environmental science; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology","score_opus":0.10051279760314055,"score_gpt":0.1941551390439954,"score_spread":0.09364234144085484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091554197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768437,0.00010623704,0.000029754145,0.022443004,0.0000108749855,0.00018306782,0.000017119166,0.000009201606,0.00035701564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99621767,0.0016821566,0.0005576886,0.0011974518,0.000004586207,0.000007990794,0.000018728497,0.0000013848631,0.00031237007],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963474,0.000054387096,0.00009514817,0.00008767651,0.00007478726,0.000053252246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997304,0.00008800508,0.00010165608,0.000061869934,0.000012033196,0.0000060312195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009269946,0.00004923367,0.00007431205,0.000014848194,0.0001688015,0.000007648353,0.000038887334,0.000033388067,0.00003835253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024386718,0.000037348615,0.000009663274,0.00004040443,0.00052246073,0.00022328865,0.00010352103,0.000021752947,0.0000018576511],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005793732,0.000043392654,0.9665259,0.0000736428,0.000030087122,0.0000010428561,0.0021241743,0.000011572135,0.0001642886,0.0013666382,0.029142646,0.0004586467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017905104,0.000044516073,0.933568,0.000010172645,0.00003456952,4.7651815e-7,0.0015675401,0.00018986712,0.00016358367,0.00082184805,0.06337504,0.00004534816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059160218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009372133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034232393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000060907964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000018721788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8943295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091639909","doi":"10.1007/s10531-013-0489-1","title":"Effects of prescribed burning and harvesting on ground-dwelling spiders in the Canadian boreal mixedwood forest","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Disturbance (geology); Biodiversity; Ecology; Generalist and specialist species; Salvage logging; Boreal; Prescribed burn; Habitat; Taiga; Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis; Logging; Fauna; Environmental science; Biology; Geography; Snag","score_opus":0.011336463781921307,"score_gpt":0.17732915959447507,"score_spread":0.16599269581255377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091639909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99720997,0.000019464514,0.000019876748,0.0016522587,0.000017095865,0.00015990091,0.0000011499006,0.0000030675076,0.0009172085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991425,0.000015581352,0.000109978675,0.0007041767,0.0000020933485,0.000003777829,0.0000044860153,5.424681e-7,0.000016839334],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969393,0.00004269317,0.00005383117,0.000082394545,0.000048264395,0.0000788857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997323,0.00017531666,0.000035922043,0.0000274807,0.0000062503873,0.000022742823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001323789,0.00003974407,0.000045760626,0.000026406942,0.00029177035,0.000019812205,0.000038201782,0.000033860542,0.0000054934585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055181084,0.000033334465,0.0000065187974,0.00005752082,0.00013810466,0.00014186595,0.000023350978,0.00005110899,0.000008473844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003267924,0.0000073169635,0.9974491,0.000012329318,0.0000033530944,0.0000013807639,0.0013663793,0.00006818506,0.000045190944,0.0003573931,0.00016323161,0.0005228657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017367209,0.000033702276,0.9960624,0.000010043951,0.000007858818,6.32981e-7,0.0004949938,0.002649602,0.000018037172,0.00045070497,0.000062258856,0.000036107638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37068695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55536366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18467669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027813687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005242256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6335037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091690152","doi":"10.1007/s10531-009-9682-7","title":"In the dark in a large urban park: DNA barcodes illuminate cryptic and introduced moth species","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Royal British Columbia Museum; Canadian Forest Service; Canadian Food Inspection Agency; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"DNA barcoding; Biodiversity; Lepidoptera genitalia; Species complex; Biology; Ecology; Species diversity; Introduced species; Geography; Phylogenetic tree","score_opus":0.01287887977487826,"score_gpt":0.2019085133020304,"score_spread":0.18902963352715216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091690152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916999,0.00024055998,0.000025680472,0.0069432743,0.00002704961,0.00011229009,0.000016713448,0.0000028682718,0.0009316886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959232,0.00019355325,0.000061109036,0.0036767737,0.000037299433,0.0000021040933,0.00005986815,6.589222e-7,0.000045424902],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995174,0.0000792806,0.000078156496,0.0001770217,0.000030996434,0.00011715788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982715,0.000017928185,0.000030077574,0.000091532704,0.000016122653,0.000017185053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002221614,0.00007148245,0.00007471063,0.000036708927,0.00008636541,0.000018384042,0.00006817924,0.00008577565,0.000005324354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004287159,0.00005851511,0.000014717114,0.00006057754,0.00009014674,0.000012725556,0.000034317243,0.00006148047,0.0000026048212],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020304677,0.000095072406,0.98103327,0.000011745654,0.000012615356,0.00001212106,0.0011691309,3.8889067e-7,0.011443253,0.0007600659,0.0034134896,0.0018458202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009794803,0.00018186234,0.93878025,0.000009253412,0.000011807171,0.0000064130813,0.0009989096,0.000028390825,0.0023354737,0.00027544252,0.05625316,0.00013956452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005118214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014524047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05283967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000059355434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001276545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23861769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092002070","doi":"10.1007/s10531-007-9266-3","title":"A private management approach to coral reef conservation in Sabah, Malaysia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Marine protected area; Business; Coral reef; Fishery; Poaching; Marine conservation; Coral reef protection; Guardian; Enforcement; Biodiversity; Fishing; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Wildlife; Habitat; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.018458374994353342,"score_gpt":0.1913322887649206,"score_spread":0.17287391377056724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092002070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98867756,0.00000679237,0.0009508685,0.0016912007,0.000050888,0.00032913193,0.00000490186,0.000024418017,0.008264213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99563175,0.000018349336,0.0022678196,0.0014959482,0.000008155791,0.0000066555076,0.000020298174,0.0000015375285,0.00054949155],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999367,0.000016817017,0.00012656358,0.00021187948,0.00012577683,0.00015193752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980456,0.000014725487,0.00004211642,0.000081044294,0.0000078438,0.000049711663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002826619,0.00007856855,0.00008670777,0.000054753444,0.00012676182,0.000017497341,0.00007138117,0.000033354787,0.000029782275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008755441,0.00007963511,0.00001503634,0.0002696126,0.000047594473,0.00015565687,0.0002999411,0.000039884508,0.00013186526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007604905,0.00005014375,0.9877906,0.000020243113,0.000006059836,0.0000055553205,0.0002738338,0.0000049375676,0.00016830767,0.0008551659,0.0076649655,0.0030841625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033385525,0.000028649349,0.9750268,0.000008196423,0.000008620882,0.0000017881384,0.00040821458,0.0003828465,0.0000406209,0.00013684627,0.023520907,0.000102647966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016628039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007500917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015855942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009261222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000016221678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32474253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093012463","doi":"10.1007/s10531-012-0406-z","title":"The use of geographic information systems to map and assess ecosystem services","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canmore Museum and Geoscience Centre","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem management; Geographic information system; Ecosystem; Total human ecosystem; Context (archaeology); Land use; Ecosystem health; Biodiversity; Spatial contextual awareness; Strengths and weaknesses; Business; Geography; Remote sensing; Environmental science; Ecology","score_opus":0.025103342930876182,"score_gpt":0.18216800009018885,"score_spread":0.15706465715931267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093012463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990681,0.00008073455,0.000025848143,0.0004094615,0.00013846776,0.00018032134,0.00004265009,0.00001185544,0.000042584958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995983,0.00007553825,0.000038882437,0.00025321898,0.00000885836,0.0000034492261,0.000015273077,6.919986e-7,0.000005738907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956465,0.000038161026,0.000117643154,0.000058022728,0.000116204814,0.00010529582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969274,0.00004915863,0.00009398771,0.00008354159,0.00001696957,0.00006357693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023006201,0.000053854365,0.00006831505,0.000024177443,0.00026776842,0.00010955902,0.00006475065,0.000039009486,0.000007870066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000032372989,0.00003743401,0.000010949431,0.00007886048,0.000012666635,0.0014297424,0.00011040883,0.000019854535,0.00008301973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014439431,0.0000052981927,0.9986036,0.00011294918,0.000008150333,3.8934733e-8,0.0004300617,0.00003283055,0.000031673007,0.00006919537,0.0003949775,0.00029682365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109953675,0.000016687585,0.83339995,0.000025958345,0.000018145462,0.0000018414582,0.00073922117,0.0021705944,0.000033780383,0.0000028441432,0.16341907,0.000061930215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049753073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001526865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16520359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012323554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000016603253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.752121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095738279","doi":"10.1007/s10531-015-1018-1","title":"Canada and Aichi Biodiversity Target 11: understanding ‘other effective area-based conservation measures’ in the context of the broader target","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University; Yukon Department of Environment; Dalhousie University; Government of Northwest Territories; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on Biological Diversity; Operationalization; Biodiversity; Context (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Convention; Biodiversity conservation; Business; Inclusion (mineral); Corporate governance; Diversity (politics); Political science; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.038151483860835916,"score_gpt":0.1808075313383901,"score_spread":0.14265604747755417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095738279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805539,0.000043756845,0.00032691352,0.017967599,0.00009274826,0.0005776934,0.00014266846,0.000011023858,0.00028364733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99068594,0.000005966519,0.00007034613,0.009163055,0.000005227411,0.000003100409,0.00002587588,0.000001636345,0.000038874423],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868363,0.00028131643,0.00015324839,0.0002525327,0.00046547412,0.00016380088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939483,0.0001580434,0.00015996186,0.00017732842,0.000044995813,0.00006485159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006673899,0.00014259614,0.00014471583,0.00005094604,0.00047942984,0.000042491054,0.00022996741,0.00007595229,0.000048676487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000087292705,0.000104812105,0.000036946745,0.00033483718,0.00047125074,0.00016921315,0.00020184142,0.00010259823,0.0000048335423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000860988,0.000038283455,0.9758185,0.00001543088,0.000016852797,0.0000025259312,0.0020470615,0.00009434007,0.000038791317,0.00004763951,0.021719728,0.000074734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011870987,0.000035285953,0.9548981,0.000014787122,0.000047026937,0.0000010745213,0.00996989,0.0009995383,0.00018048541,0.00016753878,0.032357406,0.00014174482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6909103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61518663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07572362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038754582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104409744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42741135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096993717","doi":"10.1023/a:1021398729516","title":"Assessing New Zealand fern diversity from spatial predictions of species assemblages","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Species richness; Biodiversity; Ecology; Fern; Global biodiversity; Spatial ecology; Species diversity; Evapotranspiration; Indicator value; Landform; Geography; Environmental science; Physical geography; Biology; Cartography","score_opus":0.07878484041140245,"score_gpt":0.22106030446050623,"score_spread":0.1422754640491038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096993717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953542,0.000029108036,0.00021752343,0.0018769947,0.000074643416,0.000049469236,0.00017843522,0.00002698846,0.0021926789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986858,0.00016213911,0.000035293077,0.000185303,0.000016191894,2.199546e-7,0.00010845625,8.618135e-7,0.0008057464],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953336,0.00002027759,0.00007314629,0.00013277936,0.00016119781,0.00007926253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976254,0.000031181175,0.000066209046,0.000071432325,0.000009869595,0.00005877922],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000038767917,0.000059129805,0.000076213044,0.000016561056,0.00032898004,0.000040416602,0.000058362057,0.00005039722,0.020362275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016772823,0.00006230045,0.000026566691,0.00008682877,0.00010207006,0.000340762,0.0002374866,0.000038627197,0.00017293783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006878156,0.000033393433,0.93138254,0.0000015762387,0.0000072975117,0.0000011725908,0.00038397615,0.0000013615452,0.0010416673,0.00001529787,0.06648758,0.0006372356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028579135,0.000017719458,0.98588085,0.000003995612,0.000028018057,6.354914e-7,0.0010139962,0.00015043882,0.0003803565,0.0000314338,0.012142312,0.000064423795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056827363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040450078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05449832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009100176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000018232157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98053324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097044442","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0059-3","title":"Human-disturbance and caterpillars in managed forest fragments","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Quadrat; Caterpillar; Ecology; Habitat; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Lepidoptera genitalia; Secondary forest; Forest restoration; Predation; Biology; Geography; Forest ecology; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.02296373061820907,"score_gpt":0.19566445366374974,"score_spread":0.17270072304554068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097044442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976063,0.000022889835,0.000020969374,0.00027004717,0.000019102548,0.00006292676,0.0000025713496,0.000007029992,0.0019882051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921536,0.00004134139,0.0001553204,0.00041796418,8.9523064e-7,0.0000018314547,0.000004321808,5.032101e-7,0.00016243616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997475,0.000015014601,0.000046398636,0.00010282157,0.000030330588,0.000057896053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999919,0.000006800576,0.000025187554,0.000031744872,0.0000027560025,0.000014516495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006359776,0.00003715541,0.00004129364,0.00001608164,0.00017930764,0.0000045082775,0.000029288834,0.00003032715,0.000053698972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000045594074,0.000038741822,0.000004705215,0.00004126407,0.00014446942,0.00011589683,0.00007672661,0.000028717452,0.000026425554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000676282,0.000014491887,0.99827254,0.000003893278,0.000003170986,0.0000028033303,0.0008645082,0.0000017223743,0.000028733348,0.00035750936,0.0003368377,0.00010701221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021564697,0.000017218872,0.99799067,0.000002237057,0.000005074409,4.854867e-7,0.00020371919,0.0001323191,0.000009186641,0.0012081439,0.00016980969,0.0000454632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012292707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005864844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046355734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001738555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":7.7006126e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3272721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097967078","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-2120-y","title":"Short-term effects of experimental boreal forest &amp;logging disturbance on bumble bees, bumble &amp;bee-pollinated flowers and the bee–flower match","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Apidae; Pollinator; Pollination; Ecology; Hymenoptera; Pollen","score_opus":0.029409108797152198,"score_gpt":0.2079079662020241,"score_spread":0.1784988574048719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097967078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99656934,0.00079754216,0.0000019176248,0.0021816525,0.000029261328,0.00017868637,0.00006104241,0.000024332494,0.00015622127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990998,0.0003205588,0.000028813965,0.00030349553,0.00004579214,0.0000040908044,0.00006402603,3.4511163e-7,0.00013309452],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944746,0.000033674867,0.00009662136,0.00017295899,0.000113997776,0.0001353035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970776,0.0001623134,0.000049654922,0.000017118966,0.000026734939,0.000036402605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009562187,0.00010554691,0.00014643003,0.000007945139,0.00043319847,0.000037857553,0.00008098658,0.000055565073,0.000009379165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000151945305,0.000044798882,0.00003957336,0.00007422989,0.000195195,0.00011049595,0.00007470736,0.000057454305,0.0000074866007],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084954454,0.00018719544,0.83074075,0.000037013553,0.00005955981,0.000003081367,0.0008812377,0.0000013682619,0.15289582,0.00046207293,0.0077895946,0.0060927602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005000378,0.00008329629,0.98561984,0.000034195433,0.000025290627,0.0000019857594,0.00021476956,0.000029518716,0.0046201046,0.000026522303,0.008725772,0.000118639866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012843525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00465829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15487912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014782733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002011969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3331856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099116655","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-9663-9","title":"Invasion risks posed by the aquarium trade and live fish markets on the Laurentian Great Lakes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":204,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Macrophyte; Fishery; Introduced species; Biodiversity; Invasive species; Ecology; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.0309324694945509,"score_gpt":0.2033484150052228,"score_spread":0.1724159455106719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099116655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9529824,0.000013616629,0.0000050155077,0.046401627,0.000031654552,0.00015389927,0.000029645855,0.000010531207,0.00037159224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902978,0.000037440044,0.000016785192,0.009239522,0.000010125823,0.0000025335949,0.000028823553,0.0000010717563,0.0003658904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952424,0.000098305885,0.00005824082,0.00013646856,0.00009241049,0.00009031783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997406,0.00010458458,0.000042560154,0.00008223574,0.0000026241096,0.000027380644],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019135738,0.00006790061,0.00004897999,0.0000072234525,0.00058181956,0.000029485103,0.0000857226,0.00007091378,0.002324691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001637824,0.000041772742,0.00001536118,0.000044375716,0.00028426727,0.00013496922,0.00005772287,0.000088199944,0.00028128494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056204062,0.00005262314,0.52994835,0.0000018596811,0.000008451285,0.0000014689277,0.0012641611,0.0000012478433,0.0006842537,0.00003887813,0.46378517,0.0041573294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002781173,0.00005244365,0.9769574,0.0000036211857,0.000039406463,0.0000030097367,0.00057326694,0.0005556428,0.0008842135,0.000050387658,0.020528631,0.00007385175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048719748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029504558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44700906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024977979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038251223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100122110","doi":"10.1007/s10531-009-9694-3","title":"Tree size and herbivory determine below-canopy grass quality and species composition in savannahs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kruger (Canada)","funders":"South African National Parks; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; A.F.W. Schimper-Stiftung für Ökologische Forschungen","keywords":"Herbivore; Grazing; Biology; Herbaceous plant; Canopy; Ecology; Biodiversity; Tree canopy; Woody plant; Species richness; Shrubland; Ecosystem; Agronomy","score_opus":0.025640419071009425,"score_gpt":0.22926225357109595,"score_spread":0.20362183450008653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100122110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927059,0.00008995871,0.00003088267,0.0064719813,0.00001836491,0.00007895193,0.0000056760387,0.00001091852,0.00058737566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99787915,0.0001739941,0.00031145773,0.0015413812,0.0000032309513,7.877053e-7,0.000006363505,4.9157535e-7,0.00008316197],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995903,0.00004903679,0.00008789794,0.00014503121,0.00005309897,0.00007466956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997995,0.00008715505,0.000043448494,0.00003647867,0.000006601703,0.000026830054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014428732,0.000059743197,0.000086071326,0.000019164283,0.00022019845,0.0000146593375,0.0000243107,0.000047936115,0.000022284692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021544873,0.000062860396,0.000007995169,0.000057423935,0.00021485299,0.00018696049,0.000048437156,0.000043413285,0.0000057837087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041487077,0.000026335385,0.99544215,0.000008183783,0.0000029644873,0.0000021864087,0.00041979263,0.0000015680665,0.0025497384,0.00022810494,0.00014816925,0.0011293151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004396712,0.000053970776,0.997644,0.0000061307537,0.000008457103,0.0000019436989,0.00024245489,0.00022929799,0.00006397219,0.0011179481,0.00011643772,0.00007569915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019431634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029211056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051732413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024687282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000022510949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25633726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104789650","doi":"10.1023/a:1015500513603","title":"Endemism, diversity, and the threat of tropical moist forest extinctions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Society; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Endemism; Geography; Biodiversity; Threatened species; Ecology; Species richness; Global biodiversity; Habitat destruction; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.024192252879639223,"score_gpt":0.18510969307954314,"score_spread":0.16091744019990392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104789650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929973,0.000044784203,0.00017965387,0.0044749416,0.000023702092,0.00006600461,0.0000052709793,0.0000072319986,0.0022011304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990792,0.00025309811,0.000059968923,0.00039544265,0.000002859162,9.725809e-7,0.0000014612237,3.539915e-7,0.00020661313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997412,0.000028316088,0.00004967868,0.000079384015,0.000054700904,0.000046700952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998102,0.00008858155,0.000036267484,0.0000414631,0.000007448249,0.000015993535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000056240653,0.000035623394,0.00005661808,0.000009234429,0.0009232814,0.0000041816193,0.00004225123,0.00003270275,0.00021550461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021807675,0.000027277365,0.000015436557,0.000045788125,0.00070331985,0.000083760606,0.00037469112,0.00003637268,0.000017946175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018247018,0.000014884695,0.9951788,0.000002533906,0.000009948264,3.442924e-7,0.0010312181,0.0000090240255,0.0000043251935,0.002831024,0.00069537427,0.00020426467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005529485,0.000016962707,0.99427414,8.272959e-7,0.000031056737,0.000001843163,0.0002456638,0.00309782,0.000002676752,0.0013056421,0.0004396129,0.000030814914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005289137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001090098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00608195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011014973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":5.586046e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71012276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110210180","doi":"10.1023/a:1008937017058","title":"Leaf litter inhabiting beetles as surrogates for establishing priorities for conservation of selected tropical montane cloud forests in Honduras, Central America (Coleoptera; Staphylinidae, Curculionidae)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Museum of Nature","funders":"","keywords":"Endemism; Curculionidae; Species richness; Biology; Ecology; Biodiversity; Species diversity; Geography","score_opus":0.011170000611183886,"score_gpt":0.21210795906001814,"score_spread":0.20093795844883425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110210180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99655825,0.00003854847,0.0004885116,0.0022082133,0.000053214782,0.0004678767,0.00008054679,0.00002069651,0.0000841302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99742776,0.00009358257,0.0016604753,0.000568481,0.000018012,0.000025167032,0.00010279578,0.000002801424,0.00010093942],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921083,0.000049775426,0.00023049551,0.00021337386,0.00009060157,0.00020491706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936616,0.00037005966,0.00011824204,0.000053964206,0.000057826866,0.000033755783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000092569055,0.000101630656,0.00016892684,0.0000447497,0.00028642983,0.000030204117,0.00006992229,0.00009073046,0.00006819471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016997312,0.00011042578,0.00003877054,0.00019205993,0.00023282126,0.00039048845,0.00003253707,0.000064877895,0.00000489228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025135285,0.000043094766,0.9957429,0.0000390838,0.000015537835,7.448266e-7,0.001560325,0.00013610348,0.00026834782,0.00017030629,0.0007223892,0.0010498184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009698023,0.00016449737,0.99073505,0.000022629314,0.000023772303,0.0000010125392,0.0006259526,0.0054707266,0.0002226268,0.000653363,0.0009931395,0.00011742195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026183487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015118594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012500246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006603962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023736813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8436531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113607148","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0072-6","title":"Predicting spatial occurrence of beetles and pseudoscorpions in hollow oaks in southeastern Sweden","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Occupancy; Threatened species; Ecology; Biodiversity; Habitat; Geography; Endangered species; IUCN Red List; Biology","score_opus":0.04906310789592827,"score_gpt":0.19597123536616487,"score_spread":0.1469081274702366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113607148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991323,0.00004707135,4.875394e-7,0.00048593746,0.000041809188,0.00007924686,0.00014076925,0.0000072828066,0.00006514476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998109,0.000066406064,0.000023127928,0.000068374706,0.0000047508215,7.6773733e-7,0.000017840784,4.9191826e-8,0.0000078062485],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996339,0.000031768177,0.000084612795,0.0001237122,0.000042575408,0.00008342985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998425,0.000052237156,0.00005104143,0.000013996983,0.000020592783,0.000019629493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010032796,0.000050971223,0.00008956109,0.000021015221,0.000114118026,0.000005194646,0.00005354044,0.00006350593,0.000025927588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002498543,0.00002737192,0.000012853225,0.00009866179,0.00014676222,0.000092967624,0.000093890165,0.000049657352,0.0000034500706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005821608,0.00003697992,0.9971702,0.0000066419666,0.0000034838522,0.0000026334376,0.0010503171,5.226027e-8,0.0005177174,0.000023585362,0.00003108543,0.001099072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019562223,0.00008313296,0.99720687,0.000015786309,0.0000072743783,8.080165e-7,0.0021691127,0.00003257906,0.000101273756,0.00008751036,0.000048796435,0.000051209827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00943699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037592832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028155843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003808571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032584794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99715924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116653411","doi":"10.1007/s10531-007-9151-0","title":"Do tree-level monocultures develop following Canadian boreal silviculture? Tree-level diversity tested using a new method","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Ontario Forest Research Institute; Lakehead University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Monoculture; Species evenness; Species richness; Black spruce; Biodiversity; Taiga; Diversity index; Ecology; Forestry; Species diversity; Silviculture; Vegetation (pathology); Dominance (genetics); Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.06302361987208058,"score_gpt":0.2651202125897471,"score_spread":0.20209659271766653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116653411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98655266,0.000047070975,0.008651566,0.001470353,0.0001250227,0.00017579694,0.00005298303,0.000033166354,0.0028914122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9584679,0.000016123713,0.03909334,0.0016640137,0.000019099087,6.634802e-7,0.00006862748,0.0000029080143,0.000667329],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990605,0.000052545493,0.00014106551,0.00029553368,0.00016569222,0.000284622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948734,0.0000948065,0.000087311724,0.00008158293,0.000039549446,0.00020940474],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040700048,0.00014905639,0.00014846282,0.000075321484,0.0015685305,0.000035972793,0.0001393868,0.00017240646,0.000049911247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000952211,0.0001469561,0.000051370313,0.00035739486,0.0001045503,0.00034404412,0.0002642275,0.00011028515,0.00003514477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027250928,0.000016123297,0.98703986,0.0000032895778,0.00005385851,0.00002030774,0.0029127914,0.000026950496,0.00038701645,0.00012763542,0.0038411028,0.005543819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005409933,0.000019313527,0.99512315,0.000006562162,0.0000866554,0.0000059848476,0.0014004394,0.00068118016,0.00012849054,0.000271326,0.0015336397,0.00020228326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27762282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7860129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50839007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031406677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006748362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119587836","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-0446-0","title":"Presence and Abundance of Birds in an Atlantic Forest Reserve and Adjacent Plantation of Shade-Grown Yerba Mate, in Paraguay","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Association of Field Ornithologists","keywords":"Understory; Abundance (ecology); Threatened species; Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Secondary forest; Agroforestry; Canopy; Bird conservation","score_opus":0.016859345475144824,"score_gpt":0.21911855606235653,"score_spread":0.2022592105872117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119587836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991375,0.00008844682,0.000016746124,0.00058726605,0.00000850233,0.00010336075,0.000010658608,0.000003099736,0.000044391272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924326,0.00039749013,0.000275914,0.000057543475,0.0000012922227,0.0000017142121,0.000010673222,6.3148724e-7,0.000011455911],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961793,0.000036891724,0.00011178344,0.00011623482,0.00005551782,0.000061645405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981207,0.000056063083,0.000068249676,0.000038498492,0.000008694181,0.000016452392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001464537,0.000042231135,0.000080572354,0.000039399078,0.00005064188,0.0000046093865,0.000034417597,0.00004122847,0.000010266877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019558529,0.00004355618,0.0000042958904,0.00008458175,0.00021022739,0.00028870898,0.000058939706,0.000033613655,0.0000013513944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006572851,0.00003615137,0.9970405,0.00003131185,0.0000020579148,9.889613e-7,0.0014817275,0.0002806904,0.0005543394,0.0001976687,0.000030075624,0.00027877538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040467604,0.00005320342,0.9883589,0.000020287496,0.0000046205478,0.0000011271601,0.00038892272,0.010329956,0.00015220705,0.0002199878,0.000022952654,0.00004312696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002601521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061530735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058929212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016872349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003846888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9555939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126266065","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9027-8","title":"Core and Satellite Species in Degraded Habitats: an Analysis Using Malagasy Tree Communities","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Understory; Ecology; Species richness; Biodiversity; Vegetation (pathology); Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis; Fragmentation (computing); Disturbance (geology); Geography; Habitat; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Habitat fragmentation; Abundance (ecology); Local extinction; Relative species abundance; Species diversity; Biology; Canopy; Biological dispersal; Population","score_opus":0.05883224401768745,"score_gpt":0.22846161710955193,"score_spread":0.1696293730918645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126266065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99896413,0.00007005282,0.00007547362,0.0004052118,0.000010374749,0.000048939954,0.000013616146,0.000010034906,0.0004021436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876696,0.000109806104,0.00079123175,0.00019714152,0.0000023457912,6.0949634e-7,0.00004957557,6.89427e-7,0.00008163709],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996609,0.000045181394,0.000078733494,0.00009157545,0.00004905573,0.00007453171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998262,0.000056061348,0.000041323656,0.0000533362,0.000007632902,0.000015476826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010278897,0.000055630197,0.00008963207,0.00006887675,0.00029602536,0.000020270429,0.000038198155,0.00004106031,0.000041531755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004445289,0.000058619604,0.000014027455,0.00018582915,0.00032349146,0.00022172608,0.000064083266,0.000039752435,0.0000038668118],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000123135915,0.000023266917,0.9980353,0.0000029507953,0.000013902866,0.0000015921612,0.0010460991,0.00024456132,0.0001588151,0.00032777927,0.000023714507,0.000109692926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018240332,0.000017442246,0.981701,0.0000019250278,0.00006615985,8.4422874e-7,0.003545917,0.013786318,0.000010681564,0.00053688884,0.000083027444,0.000067396584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069909366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13150458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12451364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037462418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000020471348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131405420","doi":"10.1007/s10531-006-9137-3","title":"The Berger–Parker index as an effective tool for monitoring the biodiversity of disturbed soils: a case study on Mediterranean oribatid (Acari: Oribatida) assemblages","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Study of Mite Species","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Oribatida; Biodiversity; Mediterranean climate; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Acari; Abundance (ecology); Ecosystem; Environmental science; Soil water; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.03455387145070255,"score_gpt":0.24390472566259208,"score_spread":0.20935085421188954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131405420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967628,0.000039531835,0.0000028085396,0.0018574129,0.00019074297,0.0009770286,0.00010216305,0.0000299573,0.00003754706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99968284,0.000012095985,0.0000061150786,0.000076236676,0.0001358892,0.000020309322,0.000032130345,3.8789273e-7,0.00003399343],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898356,0.00019603898,0.00014649269,0.00025391197,0.00025949348,0.0001604769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836,0.0012057843,0.00014860294,0.00008684115,0.00016658274,0.00003219937],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005137032,0.00013717226,0.00014735138,0.000014616836,0.001723307,0.00010506039,0.00019912429,0.000070776434,0.0000057976026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010344419,0.000051907704,0.00006597975,0.00018471119,0.0001833177,0.00017738908,0.00009584786,0.00008742835,0.0000034810616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033342958,0.0002245123,0.9842078,0.000005493032,0.00005880474,0.000015567584,0.0017627376,0.0000016634378,0.0015715905,0.00005195989,0.0014090382,0.010357419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046627165,0.0008431602,0.9625416,0.000006879177,0.000066555825,0.0000066007574,0.033831634,0.000033042965,0.00090951566,0.00009340302,0.0010831273,0.00011824624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010289995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053484123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032068893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003537252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000060045636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131499500","doi":"10.1007/s10531-012-0366-3","title":"Multiscale assessment of the influence of habitat structure and composition on bird assemblages in boreal forest","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Ducks Unlimited Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Biodiversity; Boreal; Threatened species; Taiga; Deciduous; Spatial ecology; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.009652723283223282,"score_gpt":0.2226484432328431,"score_spread":0.21299571994961983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131499500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99934304,0.000007459166,0.000015564605,0.00045459345,0.000018698584,0.00007467531,0.000013324973,0.0000024850096,0.00007017744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99968654,0.000015026621,0.00015797792,0.00013238829,0.0000010610157,9.0470627e-7,0.0000031937927,4.778536e-7,0.0000024318767],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997546,0.000033462577,0.000059523096,0.000051595496,0.00005624306,0.00004457181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983424,0.000051737028,0.000061394625,0.000034915538,0.0000072468147,0.000010480715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006945017,0.000032118205,0.00004997514,0.000013982896,0.00008120654,0.0000018569165,0.000028301487,0.00003208371,0.0000032479622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008831971,0.000025061327,0.0000070515366,0.000052621235,0.00018704344,0.00012139056,0.000059855178,0.00003513313,5.623337e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008413851,0.000027193239,0.99609274,0.000009422055,0.0000030868996,5.2600427e-8,0.00028331514,0.0004353463,0.00252994,0.00052309595,0.000025673533,0.000061719315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017834538,0.000023476843,0.9984974,0.000008378749,0.000007378723,3.5964672e-7,0.00006924463,0.00068812777,0.0003378468,0.00015964317,0.0000041272474,0.000025618929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005708435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003319346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027485027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018017068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002213459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1852273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133873177","doi":"10.1007/s10531-005-5819-5","title":"Conservation Targets for Viable Species Assemblages in Canada: Are Percentage Targets Appropriate?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Set-aside; National park; Biodiversity; Persistence (discontinuity); Selection (genetic algorithm); Nature reserve; Ecology; Representation (politics); Geography; Biology; Biodiversity conservation; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.012209380571281554,"score_gpt":0.17112995137042278,"score_spread":0.15892057079914124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133873177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909515,0.00004007026,0.00020211143,0.00780852,0.00015020311,0.00036568084,0.0000710742,0.000023083387,0.00038777193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955897,0.000022758517,0.0004011077,0.0030141142,0.000025275625,0.00002068584,0.00027919497,0.0000034800119,0.00064371375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991028,0.00005163177,0.00019133183,0.00028058828,0.0001506137,0.00022306906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960417,0.00010078508,0.00013968052,0.00009300782,0.00002402529,0.00003831015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020256283,0.00012409013,0.00015486566,0.000038963855,0.00032437133,0.000027173272,0.00009499214,0.000094161696,0.00022948146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040938394,0.00013744624,0.000024344772,0.00013421508,0.0000798992,0.00037331867,0.000064751424,0.00007204667,0.000024253763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005055868,0.000036912126,0.95215034,0.000016202857,0.000004631834,0.0000036710221,0.000043303407,0.00007991407,0.00050709554,0.00019342962,0.046821885,0.0000920647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005813876,0.000016822652,0.98087513,0.0000073927235,0.000013793869,0.0000011926012,0.00043951263,0.0013674395,0.00027833055,0.00049699756,0.01575872,0.00016324912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8282329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9352351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10700221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000461171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007663922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56048954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134717010","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0127-8","title":"Biodiversity conservation in old-growth boreal forest: black spruce and balsam fir snags harbour distinct assemblages of saproxylic beetles","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Université Laval; Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Snag; Balsam; Biodiversity; Ecology; Taiga; Black spruce; Biology; Coarse woody debris; Forest ecology; Forest management; Abies balsamea; Forestry; Geography; Agroforestry; Ecosystem; Habitat; Botany","score_opus":0.03533603035250082,"score_gpt":0.1891768797037396,"score_spread":0.15384084935123876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134717010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958217,0.00007576608,0.0000015785016,0.0033028675,0.000047061516,0.00021855171,0.00022167775,0.000031523854,0.00027927977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987735,0.00029189157,0.00007325427,0.0006877358,0.000012072568,0.0000014992314,0.00012856824,2.7153487e-7,0.00003118724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912524,0.00008133071,0.00017586337,0.00030105803,0.00012124578,0.00019525149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994129,0.00015233287,0.00016047848,0.000044138447,0.00016571993,0.00006442934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023681995,0.00015180993,0.00022849451,0.000045505865,0.00037280077,0.00002195974,0.00014393636,0.00017137484,0.00004565803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010262779,0.000089263536,0.0000479048,0.00024459517,0.0005468788,0.00029449185,0.00022591083,0.000093219074,0.000016677512],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019375706,0.000100454294,0.9946523,0.0000373735,0.000026751055,0.0000082782,0.00035204357,5.791725e-8,0.0012496918,0.00047940263,0.0024482869,0.00045163214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042896214,0.00025686875,0.9959997,0.000018574006,0.000047804442,0.0000019787121,0.0014769075,0.000030285553,0.0005115239,0.00063856645,0.00042039552,0.00016842861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020503987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022596667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029518262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022099026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009544894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141085885","doi":"10.1007/s10531-010-9797-x","title":"Bee communities (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) of small Iowa hill prairies are as diverse and rich as those of large prairie preserves","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Forb; Species richness; Ecology; Biodiversity; Species evenness; Geography; Gamma diversity; Species diversity; Habitat; Plant community; Range (aeronautics); Grassland; Alpha diversity; Biology","score_opus":0.06008678188990898,"score_gpt":0.2196294742110336,"score_spread":0.1595426923211246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141085885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958401,0.00021555783,1.6477503e-7,0.0030464265,0.000021915353,0.00010936532,0.00046462865,0.000017596512,0.00028427658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993162,0.00022482903,0.000037162696,0.00022485731,0.00001648861,0.0000013635245,0.000048501624,2.108785e-7,0.0001303996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953103,0.000056336743,0.00011067119,0.000103087106,0.00009529865,0.00010357774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994477,0.00021598609,0.00015105966,0.000021755432,0.00012655027,0.00003696115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018774984,0.00008703676,0.00015563228,0.000012890343,0.00037863632,0.000025949277,0.000109342436,0.00007745415,0.000038529706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008098898,0.000043545086,0.00002735153,0.00007903302,0.00027288185,0.00016371903,0.0002394467,0.000084274965,0.0000036813474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001054017,0.00006689094,0.9708444,0.00003770644,0.00002461905,0.0000015385683,0.0009688876,3.5220953e-8,0.02514219,0.00082372915,0.0010739547,0.00091063016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020853577,0.00021895216,0.9757329,0.00002749622,0.00002984258,0.000001941358,0.0105583565,0.000008745275,0.002204452,0.00026102763,0.010653356,0.00009436064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006351676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048481207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04212953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000022164875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000054320717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96888155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142116500","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-6064-z","title":"Searching for biodiversity indicators in running waters: do bryophytes, macroinvertebrates, and fish show congruent diversity patterns?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Biodiversity; Ecology; River ecosystem; Invertebrate; Habitat; Biota; Taxonomic rank; Taxon; Bryophyte; Species diversity; Dominance (genetics); Beta diversity; Biology","score_opus":0.01616261231592719,"score_gpt":0.19746007733709384,"score_spread":0.18129746502116664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142116500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99447227,0.000026370892,0.00006129499,0.004609904,0.000094391246,0.0003471206,0.00023883382,0.000040082567,0.0001097208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952162,0.0001140174,0.00032688506,0.0041178903,0.00001545648,0.000002707671,0.00013168533,0.0000026831954,0.0000725092],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987355,0.00006653303,0.00015034797,0.000484599,0.0001838227,0.0003792366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995533,0.0000627479,0.00008890977,0.00011864946,0.0000158354,0.00016056014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040372342,0.00018056751,0.00020102662,0.00019923442,0.001201275,0.00010000994,0.00022516791,0.0001496113,0.00033816532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018929019,0.00020211152,0.000046768302,0.00021661246,0.00035731614,0.0008405918,0.0012110147,0.00018296693,0.00010443962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013507817,0.000058918624,0.9848466,0.00003567093,0.000020726287,0.000013114366,0.002400827,0.000035191606,0.00008875772,0.00005811787,0.01007267,0.0022343628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020809418,0.00012076763,0.97902846,0.000019180992,0.000047278703,0.0000066130933,0.0021731744,0.002139041,0.0006538362,0.00016225885,0.013220238,0.00034821426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072338968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007463747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005818109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020449923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011541661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143084295","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-7845-0","title":"Do we need species-specific guidelines for catch-and-release recreational angling to effectively conserve diverse fishery resources?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":462,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts","keywords":"Fishing; Catch and release; Recreational fishing; Fishery; Recreation; Fisheries management; Biodiversity; Business; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.06248860060325981,"score_gpt":0.24519059996493897,"score_spread":0.18270199936167916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143084295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94589734,0.00010551829,0.00046371252,0.052112427,0.00006730998,0.0004216368,0.000064725464,0.000032592852,0.0008347204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9394924,0.0021913054,0.018004524,0.033384796,0.00032577326,0.000100148034,0.00012693806,0.00001302465,0.0063611045],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993257,0.00003423962,0.00012826585,0.00027244413,0.00010362582,0.00013572161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995972,0.00015324439,0.000065214765,0.00007291242,0.000049421073,0.00006198976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002600002,0.00010148717,0.00011039803,0.000046749283,0.00058059674,0.00003625395,0.00007199838,0.00005626507,0.00027882846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014134747,0.00010398382,0.000028908911,0.00010665964,0.00016494148,0.00021880305,0.0002175239,0.00003994884,0.00009714098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017389002,0.000024659394,0.49908614,0.000010612498,0.000022575552,0.0000013443396,0.00074206316,0.00005974468,0.000102897844,0.0001336285,0.4963665,0.0032759337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051136414,0.0000527657,0.6258967,0.000011148831,0.000027440436,6.654538e-7,0.0010272583,0.00017549092,0.000044901324,0.000103102466,0.3720462,0.00010297162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002454194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008824432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12681055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007254263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000037567436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44655392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146147595","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-2137-2","title":"Mapping the spatial distribution of plant diversity indices in a tropical forest using multi-spectral satellite image classification and field measurements","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Quadrat; Alpha diversity; Beta diversity; Vegetation (pathology); Gamma diversity; Diversity index; Biodiversity; Ecology; Species diversity; Ecological succession; Geography; Physical geography; Biology; Species richness","score_opus":0.07522471650205732,"score_gpt":0.21648106580210066,"score_spread":0.14125634930004333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146147595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99816364,0.000023471683,0.0010400423,0.00059018406,0.000021155482,0.00011728572,0.00003155272,0.0000046900523,0.000007981918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997026,0.000049604103,0.00013852696,0.00007234881,0.0000046776763,5.094195e-7,0.00003101762,4.6605697e-7,2.5632164e-7],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996063,0.00002706256,0.000084873966,0.00010676205,0.00010348814,0.00007149433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998448,0.000016068381,0.00006862646,0.000043724558,0.0000065449494,0.000020267531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001039706,0.000045914465,0.00005861839,0.000015522313,0.00023484588,0.000017404178,0.000054954522,0.000041429743,0.00000723052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007946901,0.00003585531,0.000011629651,0.00007236378,0.00003706367,0.00020702093,0.000113412265,0.0000376388,0.000002839128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003859505,0.000025074907,0.99751294,0.000016365162,0.0000043599352,9.0346697e-7,0.0007871125,0.000018724819,0.0013785872,0.000010236767,0.0000036855195,0.00020340235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005006091,0.000020617977,0.99618286,0.00002107259,0.000010800932,0.0000013116077,0.0004363937,0.0022346147,0.00045899197,0.000051480743,0.00003634426,0.000044896242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018662496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0195152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022158897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058485955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004559515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151376144","doi":"10.1007/s10531-008-9340-5","title":"Evidence for decline in eastern North American bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae), with special focus on Bombus affinis Cresson","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":359,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bumblebee; Fauna; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Pollinator; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Biodiversity; Biology; Species richness; Apidae; Temperate climate; Hymenoptera; Pollination; Pollen","score_opus":0.12278964022888506,"score_gpt":0.22769847674097807,"score_spread":0.10490883651209301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151376144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933532,0.00006509381,0.0000015995391,0.0062487232,0.000015195744,0.00014001892,0.00006975404,0.000015844635,0.00009059449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986812,0.0004492691,0.000048681497,0.0006145664,0.00014033208,0.000004097647,0.00002222006,1.8825337e-7,0.000039446084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950385,0.000018776973,0.00007429542,0.00017779201,0.000101249265,0.00012402958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996705,0.00018417463,0.00006397225,0.000011728736,0.000037653033,0.00003196152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000048580627,0.000082200524,0.00012282918,0.0000111792715,0.00030442202,0.000022754666,0.00007060604,0.000020643993,0.000008378258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024142697,0.000036399768,0.000020426805,0.00015080514,0.00010317003,0.00009248079,0.000040615636,0.000037236183,0.000009976834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086017395,0.000041146952,0.9778343,0.000003107079,0.000006129604,0.000008094935,0.0001305128,5.611498e-7,0.00037304158,0.000013647888,0.00079417607,0.019935107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025754972,0.00072414306,0.9944804,0.000025260104,0.000007775698,0.0000016872945,0.0001672491,0.000021800071,0.00016296515,0.000013835913,0.0040365146,0.00010081795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028469583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09128267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08843572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012163857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004594558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92529905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155756502","doi":"10.1023/a:1016807606593","title":"Researching little-known species: the African bat Otomops martiensseni (Chiroptera: Molossidae)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Cave; Ecology; Harem; Biodiversity; Human echolocation; Zoology; Biology","score_opus":0.05861489719891883,"score_gpt":0.19551500706595284,"score_spread":0.13690010986703402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155756502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94413733,0.00022492658,6.549298e-7,0.052696545,0.00007963709,0.00011022131,0.00003980684,0.000032359723,0.0026785324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967169,0.00029466004,0.000015495592,0.0016120394,0.00008021262,0.0000038804474,0.000017141376,1.5877929e-7,0.0012595116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993363,0.00011600496,0.000087141205,0.00018731733,0.00007784268,0.00019537381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954236,0.00028490796,0.000044780103,0.00004198781,0.000045736633,0.000040248116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020736209,0.00008146863,0.00009400188,0.000009478269,0.0012724242,0.00004456292,0.00013881894,0.000088721106,0.0005479764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006956483,0.000029835674,0.000036845144,0.00015039358,0.00039347017,0.00010197779,0.00014381854,0.00013239894,0.00014216435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066973065,0.000062746425,0.93532145,0.000004978799,0.000041400574,0.000007924454,0.0011366747,1.6392275e-7,0.004012266,0.00052322034,0.045318034,0.01350417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009276028,0.00010805019,0.9020201,0.0000031227578,0.000011406696,0.0000044377302,0.0014533799,0.000063440704,0.000112529575,0.00015158032,0.09589888,0.00008033536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040547736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012127867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052579585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012876783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000016722704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9786587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159382108","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0088-y","title":"A mobility index for Canadian butterfly species based on naturalists’ knowledge","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Butterfly; Respondent; Amateur; Ecology; Geography; Taxon; Range (aeronautics); Biodiversity; Biology; Political science","score_opus":0.03589852238350872,"score_gpt":0.20380725846180164,"score_spread":0.16790873607829293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159382108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899991,0.000007437213,0.0002702444,0.0016799931,0.000086032254,0.00017876197,0.00005763179,0.0000133422345,0.0077074235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976049,0.0000030243605,0.00023033776,0.0018073523,0.0000039104143,0.0000063980942,0.000020277956,7.40372e-7,0.00032302598],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996773,0.000019001289,0.000047925947,0.00012993145,0.000032896194,0.0000929479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998104,0.00004733637,0.000024287161,0.000055681052,0.000016958295,0.00004532534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000104490755,0.000051203922,0.000049824448,0.000030027286,0.00038217203,0.0000066695234,0.00005042065,0.000054093278,0.00024603607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028796865,0.00005074404,0.000018207682,0.00005637417,0.0001628814,0.000077635166,0.000023527164,0.000036466103,0.000064253996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042372172,0.000031404717,0.9948603,0.000005912209,0.0000043506566,4.916637e-7,0.0006148063,0.0000065746212,0.000010858114,0.00048491583,0.0037827042,0.00015533228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023176918,0.000048338195,0.98905456,0.0000019074707,0.00000772701,1.4940609e-7,0.00013315196,0.0046229013,0.000035694015,0.00036513523,0.005435687,0.00006300668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023120413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2703072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2471868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008874161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016405056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9833847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160466744","doi":"10.1007/s10531-012-0425-9","title":"Matrix type alters structure of aquatic vertebrate assemblages in cypress domes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Park Service; McGill University","keywords":"Metacommunity; Cypress; Ecology; Nestedness; Biodiversity; Community structure; Beta diversity; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.020652141018411625,"score_gpt":0.23077659385440175,"score_spread":0.21012445283599013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160466744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99911135,0.00018782947,0.000003319305,0.00026563526,0.000046985344,0.00006974396,0.00000631965,0.0000053185886,0.0003034812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994537,0.00013923181,0.00013141576,0.0002294881,0.000004371284,2.308904e-7,0.000005638377,8.356823e-7,0.000035047902],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996453,0.000028439312,0.000070094364,0.000076265205,0.000087733424,0.00009219075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998465,0.00002392631,0.000047482576,0.000052402058,0.0000040605373,0.000025582489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006948868,0.00005060698,0.00008026123,0.000016105205,0.000048557227,0.0000055076443,0.000055439235,0.000029419998,0.00032595207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002023412,0.000047381258,0.000010529456,0.00012493775,0.000060665952,0.000218831,0.00014475528,0.000030675285,0.000042522366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018309502,0.000014707684,0.99554706,0.000019030002,0.0000053502645,3.6794097e-7,0.000277796,0.0000033533004,0.0019995603,0.000042268002,0.0013001144,0.0007721134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016211392,0.00001913733,0.99664253,0.00000528717,0.000012926091,5.0458755e-7,0.0001399778,0.00011221824,0.0007840622,0.000050088653,0.002016139,0.00005501801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005286916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015743842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003712532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028162543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000023386629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7992271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163754028","doi":"10.1007/s10531-010-9904-z","title":"Evaluating the protection of wildlife in parks: the case of African buffalo in Serengeti","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"International Livestock Research Institute; Zoologische Gesellschaft Frankfurt","keywords":"Poaching; Wildlife; Geography; Population; Biodiversity; Tanzania; Protected area; Bushmeat; Population growth; National park; Predation; Wildlife management; Wildlife conservation; Ecology; Socioeconomics; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.03886625324424315,"score_gpt":0.2472755378396228,"score_spread":0.20840928459537966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163754028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99310654,0.000006233708,0.000010843433,0.006433747,0.000044763623,0.0002732293,0.0000045168185,0.000003414277,0.00011670318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950135,0.000005383036,0.00008719859,0.00037908912,0.000004568768,0.000009904483,0.0000019562847,7.093993e-7,0.000009819479],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994758,0.00014233544,0.0001409351,0.00010180143,0.00007212428,0.00006699798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996203,0.00012853132,0.0001227605,0.00010351938,0.0000144345995,0.000010412133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008614578,0.00004445406,0.000063476975,0.000026542439,0.00013147428,0.0000049533064,0.00008022858,0.00006195132,0.0000702465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015368883,0.000031559393,0.000013370728,0.00023715466,0.0002690673,0.000130286,0.0000624216,0.00014136851,0.000004368469],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060767114,0.00003337613,0.9923759,0.0000062885388,0.0000024674225,0.0000028435031,0.0013547482,0.00006721943,0.002253844,0.00012405273,0.00016116943,0.0035573046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000270397,0.00005850432,0.9928677,0.0000052005976,0.00000861635,0.00001239258,0.001322332,0.0046658195,0.00020916072,0.000378167,0.00016516291,0.000036566267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017980868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03294826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014967392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001765939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015441545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9885585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166826449","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-6679-0","title":"Traditional Maize Storage Methods of Mayan Farmers in Yucatan, Mexico: Implications for Seed Selection and Crop Diversity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agnico Eagle (Canada)","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Crop; Agricultural biodiversity; Agroforestry; Biology; Agriculture; Agronomy; Selection (genetic algorithm); Husk; Genetic resources; Sowing; Biotechnology; Botany; Ecology","score_opus":0.062493729897177636,"score_gpt":0.24747258529293187,"score_spread":0.18497885539575423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166826449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937328,0.000044277494,0.0002138249,0.0054799034,0.000023880246,0.00022640021,0.00023122886,0.000016969001,0.000030700317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556655,0.00006411055,0.0036678251,0.00036639205,0.00002372807,0.00000648098,0.00025765397,2.088087e-7,0.00004704751],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951404,0.000046985646,0.00011012661,0.00016899932,0.00006196705,0.0000978566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996722,0.00011554128,0.00007470714,0.000015675221,0.000076487995,0.00004540647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001920562,0.00007271332,0.00010018364,0.000018519595,0.00036878328,0.000017029733,0.00006166603,0.00007380999,0.000021527632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018644152,0.00003743538,0.000027340751,0.00017918648,0.00004456185,0.00018341737,0.00006112864,0.00004259697,0.0000010795281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085129774,0.0000802382,0.9704152,0.000012568827,0.000017697012,9.778256e-8,0.0003415269,0.000006849549,0.009784302,0.0023075512,0.0019055652,0.015043295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000276628,0.000052606534,0.9922501,0.0000049437645,0.000017271423,0.0000023098332,0.00032797505,0.00009674509,0.0007639715,0.0016249212,0.0044910247,0.000091498296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005140217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011313717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021834927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004627164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007696791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.283642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175673609","doi":"10.1023/a:1014023326658","title":"Plant diversity in three types of hedgerows adjacent to cropfields","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Quadrat; Species richness; Biodiversity; Herbaceous plant; Deciduous; Geography; Agroforestry; Woody plant; Ecotone; Species diversity; Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Biology; Shrub","score_opus":0.03738963610786516,"score_gpt":0.19433207726283697,"score_spread":0.1569424411549718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175673609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964054,0.00002570195,0.0000947245,0.0022600482,0.000034212317,0.000068827765,0.000013026463,0.0000054168086,0.0010926013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99914074,0.00004871226,0.00014143396,0.0005678201,0.000001450151,6.0902175e-7,0.00000239883,3.2119527e-7,0.000096509204],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997386,0.000012198725,0.00005238406,0.000086999644,0.000052442407,0.00005737181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998865,0.000025144285,0.000024715282,0.000037905305,0.0000058065684,0.000019890329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005969631,0.000033738022,0.00005578128,0.000023306966,0.000142858,0.0000023188386,0.000047607078,0.000035506764,0.0003107242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000145984395,0.00003469171,0.000009429945,0.00008058434,0.00007048979,0.00006607717,0.00022698741,0.00002926808,0.000096743985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001570197,0.000029264613,0.9961502,0.0000036862798,0.0000040044238,0.0000014644288,0.0011074366,0.00006892891,0.00004966075,0.00017166954,0.0020389012,0.00035906042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016275239,0.000034340188,0.9976936,0.000002970473,0.000005797498,3.2377002e-7,0.00011870853,0.001338713,0.000038803417,0.00022898288,0.00033365967,0.00004134303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090010685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0087116575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00781155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022850112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":8.4957736e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48613092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227942155","doi":"10.1007/s10531-015-1039-9","title":"How useful are volunteers for visual biodiversity surveys? An evaluation of skill level and group size during a conservation expedition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Biodiversity conservation; Sampling (signal processing); Computer science; Applied psychology; Psychology; Ecology; Computer vision; Biology","score_opus":0.09562692038336024,"score_gpt":0.25398335657880655,"score_spread":0.15835643619544632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227942155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940549,0.0000133438425,0.0007131319,0.0034792162,0.00007676035,0.00035382653,0.0012689166,0.000026083213,0.0000138154755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999367,0.000056878052,0.000057306755,0.00020544273,0.000011356966,0.000009352967,0.0002501298,0.0000018188505,0.00004070368],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901146,0.00016286813,0.000110713554,0.00027662894,0.00030432918,0.00013403261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994325,0.0001004783,0.00016700452,0.00008893744,0.00013871561,0.0000723875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072612707,0.00010591687,0.000115617746,0.000035748744,0.000318936,0.000044481254,0.000061565384,0.0000946991,0.00069774734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023118014,0.000097615164,0.000032171854,0.00010741131,0.00025917712,0.0009103004,0.000078800054,0.000024952087,0.000014273224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011508397,0.00007685695,0.9730849,0.00002609098,0.000011617926,2.9167575e-7,0.00028339663,2.9754375e-7,0.022873068,0.000038028476,0.0023368676,0.001153503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019576442,0.00009943714,0.9902,0.000014522527,0.000060630107,0.0000014489963,0.0036958647,0.00020509762,0.0030598082,0.000050585877,0.0005165811,0.00013839392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008660285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021122748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01981326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025800004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000088680545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7639844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283365686","doi":"10.1007/s10531-015-1027-0","title":"Conservation priority of endemic Chinese flora at family and genus levels","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Endemism; Flora (microbiology); Biodiversity; Geography; Genus; Ecology; Subtropics; Evergreen; China; Biodiversity hotspot; Global biodiversity; Phylogenetic diversity; Species diversity; Biogeography; Conservation status; Distribution (mathematics); Biology; Agroforestry; Phylogenetic tree; Habitat","score_opus":0.11594439843386205,"score_gpt":0.21425196607489205,"score_spread":0.09830756764103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283365686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99721944,0.00041247034,9.3433164e-7,0.0019442155,0.000027996526,0.00007214276,0.00017926104,0.000018039029,0.00012551216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992725,0.00014950715,0.000034222554,0.0004300716,0.000023233642,5.785988e-7,0.000036367837,1.0510927e-7,0.000053377946],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996135,0.000026358946,0.00008085271,0.00011677016,0.00009125044,0.00007122045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973303,0.00006641657,0.00006303538,0.000010278879,0.00008013691,0.00004709911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013369761,0.00006414017,0.00010264751,0.0000066245,0.00017827937,0.000013086192,0.00004025643,0.000052753403,0.000007259092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042196352,0.000029471666,0.000015748026,0.00009000391,0.00008594744,0.00011772895,0.000093155635,0.000028609917,0.0000062233225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006714909,0.00001038722,0.9409193,0.000006124931,0.0000070074907,9.230357e-7,0.00017743536,3.75362e-8,0.054997083,0.000042740805,0.00193839,0.0018334633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019483136,0.00007630909,0.9909845,0.0000050805234,0.000010554023,0.0000027164042,0.0003519583,0.00004325323,0.00028813924,0.00014515825,0.0078292545,0.000068270536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015756638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019146068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054708943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012670324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005681365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23819429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2307822933","doi":"10.1007/s10531-016-1080-3","title":"The effect of human population size on the breeding bird diversity of urban regions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Population size; Species richness; Ecology; Urbanization; Population; Urban ecology; Biodiversity; Urban area; Breeding bird survey; Urban ecosystem; Abundance (ecology); Impervious surface; Habitat; Habitat fragmentation; Population density; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.028628422213495746,"score_gpt":0.21644612521991258,"score_spread":0.18781770300641684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2307822933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929314,0.0000068511827,0.000010072845,0.0067683193,0.000024077523,0.00012884752,0.000008139558,0.000010095487,0.000112163725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996821,0.000022260689,0.000004025258,0.00014330487,0.000006485874,5.4591584e-7,7.9716705e-7,9.4589e-7,0.00013949822],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955493,0.00007358588,0.000069754664,0.00008571713,0.0001452132,0.00007077007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933577,0.0004156384,0.000111365596,0.00010780338,0.000007779646,0.000021641701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032606145,0.00004545748,0.00006298935,0.000010443011,0.00080988207,0.0000049749433,0.00010194369,0.000031721484,0.00004490898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053732623,0.000022600589,0.000028064891,0.00007753826,0.00022641671,0.0000914261,0.00014981687,0.000029964967,0.000017202286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000524393,0.000005342054,0.9888199,0.0000043652585,0.000004839617,9.7672675e-8,0.00018870531,1.7803785e-7,0.0017391087,0.0008052556,0.007958839,0.00042091636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002366951,0.00025092438,0.99834687,0.0000151688055,0.000017062688,1.3440814e-7,0.000077310826,0.0000059205213,0.00049640704,0.00018298242,0.00033929944,0.00003120312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011052038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002960758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009526978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038464612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019283138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99553347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2410608952","doi":"10.1007/s10531-016-1139-1","title":"Diversity patterns of seasonal wetland plant communities mainly driven by rare terrestrial species","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Nestedness; Wetland; Species richness; Ecology; Biodiversity; Species diversity; Rare species; Plant community; Geography; Global biodiversity; Common species; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.021618297756761464,"score_gpt":0.18348583010131,"score_spread":0.16186753234454854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2410608952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997151,0.0000064990168,0.00022329522,0.0016966464,0.000056838253,0.00005767207,0.00062275166,0.000010143193,0.00017515666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992931,0.00014859201,0.000029707548,0.00018792709,0.0000053552853,6.370604e-7,0.00006221972,6.2295845e-7,0.0002718662],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964005,0.000049353697,0.00006458179,0.00007655467,0.00009210122,0.00007738527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997422,0.0001076803,0.000064491986,0.000053001826,0.00000749578,0.000025114265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006954207,0.000055444252,0.00007853545,0.000014274505,0.00061900116,0.0000048308007,0.0000878951,0.00004389306,0.00031852454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009977117,0.000044052038,0.00001959771,0.000024747218,0.00027850756,0.00015265643,0.00049440353,0.000030318908,0.000017773922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006322399,0.000021165235,0.99338526,0.000004249325,0.00001763241,0.0000010449173,0.0010093476,9.014467e-7,0.0006357424,0.00008409507,0.0046853675,0.000091995396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006002056,0.000041495958,0.99643797,0.00001036264,0.000017026607,8.904754e-7,0.0008788364,0.000064369466,0.0001630797,0.00008251813,0.0016385331,0.00006470268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001220528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038124213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030527443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003304296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000036680428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4760919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460214957","doi":"10.1007/s10531-016-1167-x","title":"Community ecological modelling as an alternative to physiographic classifications for marine conservation planning","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"Ecology; Multidimensional scaling; Biodiversity; Habitat; Environmental science; Indicator species; Abiotic component; Community structure; Marine protected area; Community; Geography; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.14201008513041152,"score_gpt":0.27839403727666007,"score_spread":0.13638395214624854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460214957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797639,0.0000012428688,0.009006614,0.010070758,0.000036608497,0.00023944811,0.00016881885,0.000041333195,0.00067125686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971079,0.000017769722,0.0004419511,0.0020829346,0.000008592355,0.000022476615,0.00021338333,0.0000017691183,0.000103190345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947435,0.00006667162,0.000089113244,0.00016066471,0.00009304568,0.000116172916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961686,0.00008897995,0.000058149028,0.00011231281,0.00003951661,0.00008417615],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018672066,0.000072242095,0.00006914208,0.000032525684,0.0005945711,0.000030828083,0.00011136308,0.00005174296,0.0013930686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044253717,0.000060145532,0.000025579717,0.00013525848,0.00013390418,0.00028280873,0.00012235965,0.000044844597,0.00013544763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036568934,0.00039762832,0.9504899,0.000013427987,0.000024849765,0.0000013218857,0.0016151421,0.00016680374,0.014034021,0.011188093,0.018476631,0.0032265228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006018724,0.00021708585,0.9730362,0.0000084775165,0.000017850503,0.000001341456,0.002417885,0.002949057,0.0005466695,0.0030022715,0.01704761,0.00015362304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017565408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005829494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022546388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012118899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000049423597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476170797","doi":"10.1007/s10531-016-1181-z","title":"Phylogenetic diversity and its conservation in the presence of phylogenetic uncertainty: a case study of cladoceran communities in urban waterbodies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; GDG Environnement; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Groupe de recherche interuniversitaire en limnologie","keywords":"Phylogenetic diversity; Phylogenetic tree; Biodiversity; Biology; Phylogenetics; Ecology; Conservation biology; Evolutionary biology; Geography; Genetics","score_opus":0.04105524998425811,"score_gpt":0.233125961704595,"score_spread":0.19207071172033688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476170797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99901855,0.00026288195,0.000007395375,0.00033485662,0.00001998386,0.00029059756,0.000056092445,0.0000022678441,0.0000073526658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995942,0.00021456878,0.000018667593,0.00013623206,0.0000051180036,0.000002214454,0.00001668216,0.0000011931229,0.00001113566],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992692,0.00023879948,0.00015645188,0.00013989504,0.00010712287,0.00008856235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957275,0.00006792108,0.00010054744,0.0001438164,0.00009584239,0.00001911093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021979661,0.00008733862,0.00012325776,0.000076262244,0.0002069456,0.000006649727,0.00012648993,0.000077917444,0.000004528476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030136802,0.00006587397,0.000017029992,0.00009711142,0.00016883918,0.000011753789,0.00032408565,0.000039829785,1.9178397e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001408637,0.00007462791,0.98036635,0.000037288173,0.000018821029,0.000010929125,0.013553227,0.00003170418,0.005336151,0.00002416584,0.000072449126,0.0003334346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016902912,0.0003438758,0.96984416,0.000025306972,0.000036341058,0.000026273538,0.026315942,0.00012862103,0.0012903959,0.00006446864,0.00013400006,0.000100293175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007476789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009775293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012762715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000061111905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014542788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515777586","doi":"10.1007/s10531-016-1188-5","title":"The importance of data mining for conservation science: a case study on the wolverine","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université de Moncton; Parks Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Anthropocene; Public domain; Range (aeronautics); Biodiversity; Geography; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Data science; Computer science; Archaeology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.1550479286314824,"score_gpt":0.2939975558427196,"score_spread":0.1389496272112372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515777586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98644626,0.000006048593,0.000045869037,0.012778362,0.000038190825,0.00029700695,0.00020636719,0.0000076107003,0.0001742597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99923205,0.000017549088,0.00002243507,0.000650855,0.0000039635615,0.000006572589,0.000011209314,7.3310713e-7,0.000054634496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946797,0.000021133159,0.00009010416,0.00016899643,0.00016087509,0.00009093077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993251,0.00026298533,0.00009165344,0.00026594248,0.00003193622,0.000022407306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007350768,0.00004511957,0.000042013602,0.000009623173,0.00076476135,0.00003113019,0.0002303811,0.000014140929,0.00035520972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018162902,0.000022977985,0.000009806475,0.00015838245,0.0005561793,0.00025599953,0.00023222467,0.000015224399,0.000012997293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005378227,0.00004386694,0.97774225,0.0000016103315,0.0000052563482,0.0000034439338,0.00035460127,3.401136e-8,0.0013474374,0.0006127444,0.017825834,0.002009113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006924924,0.00015205634,0.9445891,0.0000060575226,0.00002130777,0.0000133494705,0.033578955,0.00017261415,0.00050791097,0.000049449183,0.02013968,0.00007706775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043754556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017236355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03322435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006811531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013336541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58820033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535167741","doi":"10.1007/s10531-016-1219-2","title":"Potential conflict between future development of natural resources and high-value wildlife habitats in boreal landscapes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Habitat; Wildlife; Geography; Ecology; Biodiversity; Grizzly Bears; Threatened species; Resource (disambiguation); Taiga; Cumulative effects; Boreal; Environmental science; Biology; Population; Ursus","score_opus":0.009029880599822583,"score_gpt":0.18691318050665892,"score_spread":0.17788329990683635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535167741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99302995,0.000040696585,0.000053112,0.0066645867,0.00005578217,0.000089332905,0.00001874384,0.00001159691,0.00003618822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874127,0.000036716465,0.000622098,0.00051251636,0.000023784203,0.0000015715991,0.000023342196,0.0000012449159,0.000037454105],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994226,0.000051629602,0.00014056674,0.0001714432,0.000110188616,0.00010359068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997619,0.000057174664,0.00008213965,0.000051815274,0.000010534159,0.000036429374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001768402,0.00007518019,0.00010759376,0.000039941777,0.00014833178,0.00000871407,0.00006282093,0.00009172419,0.00003496485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016616961,0.000059419246,0.000011517448,0.00007747686,0.00015320108,0.00022464391,0.00009564315,0.00004751292,0.000012782168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067036475,0.000012204219,0.99104166,0.0000060945295,0.000009786997,0.0000014538696,0.0006728713,7.707521e-7,0.00036737384,0.000061457766,0.0010903807,0.006668886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007073669,0.000027123271,0.9941848,0.000013312967,0.00001277756,0.0000011701469,0.00018907072,0.000028371811,0.00022551382,0.00008157098,0.0044425447,0.00008637555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005416346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067994127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065825107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029566156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013141791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24230465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2545970941","doi":"10.1007/s10531-016-1245-0","title":"The road to 2020 targets and the learnings from the emblematic South American plant genus Nassauvia (Asteraceae)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Asteraceae; Biodiversity; Genus; Geography; Botany; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.008253577228626258,"score_gpt":0.19455741995114686,"score_spread":0.1863038427225206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2545970941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96827644,0.00082542625,0.0001618157,0.030386763,0.0000633051,0.00016560778,0.000094481584,0.0000045309,0.00002164842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99596477,0.000589062,0.000039708037,0.0030538873,0.00007076994,0.000006711106,0.000019995192,0.0000022634663,0.00025281572],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999459,0.00009577908,0.000085603766,0.00017090492,0.00007616398,0.00011250487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957097,0.00012917975,0.00008638441,0.00014236901,0.00004014242,0.00003093833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017279181,0.00008659323,0.00008782092,0.0000053719355,0.0006022486,0.00006820406,0.00011866422,0.00002382482,0.000004550759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009105025,0.00003624764,0.000028803737,0.000038892777,0.00029411534,0.0000062314107,0.00021532805,0.000034149332,0.000013804479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024125627,0.000025791027,0.78579926,0.000017756534,0.00050166296,0.000004675731,0.012770668,0.0000022896522,0.0358879,0.00019770442,0.053580295,0.10879944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001581847,0.0001807061,0.7664487,0.000037152426,0.00009098109,0.0000059183585,0.011517242,0.00006949088,0.001383439,0.00007165047,0.21839526,0.00021761251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058559334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003075042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16481496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003856052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010467465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46320704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2551949049","doi":"10.1007/s10531-016-1248-x","title":"Generating spatial data for marine conservation and management","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Aquatic life and conservation","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Research Council of Thailand; Ocean Park Conservation Foundation, Hong Kong; Riverbanks Zoo and Garden; SciFund Challenge; Explorers Club","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Biodiversity; Genus; Global biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Marine species; Diversity (politics); Fishery; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Biology; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.07247590797429293,"score_gpt":0.2156256398668885,"score_spread":0.14314973189259558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2551949049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96861213,0.00002055376,0.0015237596,0.029255362,0.000046192876,0.00027618685,0.00019087919,0.000029731676,0.00004519074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98550886,0.0006138886,0.004082267,0.007428558,0.00020912262,0.000023910105,0.001557582,8.4586543e-7,0.00057497947],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994341,0.000026709033,0.00012261028,0.00024127703,0.000080685284,0.000094598196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996,0.00016695881,0.00007811496,0.00006315615,0.000056450743,0.000035349465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022555843,0.00007030796,0.00007210948,0.00000879568,0.00028388482,0.000046134486,0.00009651852,0.000046555535,0.00004512458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005039819,0.000029844148,0.000011511105,0.000056564015,0.00004885225,0.0002933507,0.00020279575,0.000014173545,0.000005999847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009287411,0.000021639507,0.51387054,0.000026787819,0.000025674586,8.766246e-7,0.000027177015,5.1015608e-8,0.016527457,0.0014037435,0.010250082,0.4577531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007313971,0.00010520365,0.9008942,0.000025304716,0.00005612223,0.0000022141314,0.00018584347,0.0036556704,0.0003121071,0.0008945357,0.09296444,0.00017293914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013890645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021457316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45758015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009235339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000447096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21834412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2579454099","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1292-1","title":"Demographic responses of boreal caribou to cumulative disturbances highlight elasticity of range-specific tolerance thresholds","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs","keywords":"Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Boreal; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Environmental science; Engineering","score_opus":0.024947799134505514,"score_gpt":0.2278178891072758,"score_spread":0.20287008997277028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2579454099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957989,0.000047197012,0.00019064393,0.0031178712,0.000096847,0.00016358522,0.00010473861,0.000009955813,0.0004702679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991348,0.00006776407,0.00043252794,0.0002792183,0.000008467651,0.000003368149,0.000011871345,0.0000013576512,0.000060658804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932086,0.00005480093,0.0001600866,0.00020519905,0.0001541414,0.000104915336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935305,0.00010864605,0.00023683453,0.00021270713,0.000042416217,0.000046358204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002083275,0.000085519496,0.00015725466,0.000041099767,0.00046136102,0.000017427416,0.00019883808,0.000080255726,0.00006371896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083738676,0.00008420055,0.00003657926,0.00010454664,0.00060583564,0.00032670377,0.00013877354,0.00005005411,0.000011663709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046320813,0.00003817827,0.9939925,0.000009153944,0.000011512565,0.0000013465894,0.00041006078,0.000014697291,0.000548155,0.00054829125,0.0036212988,0.00034160324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036239083,0.00008903717,0.9961888,0.000017020382,0.000020562238,6.1985037e-7,0.00006741603,0.00007468304,0.00088229676,0.00028307934,0.0019251268,0.00008896445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025356752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013037943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033358727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021216054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011321286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3833199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581473419","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1305-0","title":"Nestedness of butterfly assemblages in the Zhoushan Archipelago, China: area effects, life-history traits and conservation implications","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Nestedness; Butterfly; Ecology; Archipelago; Biology; Biodiversity; Geography","score_opus":0.07622572896852393,"score_gpt":0.20829234290245677,"score_spread":0.13206661393393282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581473419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98399043,0.00030261723,0.0000017611769,0.01532374,0.00001983663,0.00014803304,0.000053313946,0.00001105067,0.0001492179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990472,0.0002229431,0.00000732865,0.0006608388,0.000019588884,0.0000047983413,0.000022618087,1.7559891e-7,0.000014497366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957544,0.00005358389,0.000087987726,0.00013176998,0.00006903483,0.000082208564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996028,0.00019267613,0.0001225379,0.000024242947,0.000031979955,0.000025761503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016057413,0.000071227376,0.00010829948,0.000011003533,0.0005154869,0.00004465614,0.00014847919,0.00004826356,0.0000037999005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008487356,0.00003166004,0.00002057469,0.000041886968,0.00017308479,0.000165136,0.000059155307,0.00005299593,0.0000012942679],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033620076,0.00003923678,0.96253365,0.000024276169,0.000010607031,0.0000013068147,0.0006522937,3.9866475e-8,0.029432952,0.0005603061,0.0022525406,0.004459156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015243169,0.000056854056,0.997197,0.000021545817,0.000019711182,0.00000224437,0.00044113997,0.000018665183,0.00009614767,0.0002206903,0.0017054309,0.00006813825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030041607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007232239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03466334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008484388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007124403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45414123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604787968","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1348-2","title":"Trading populations—can biodiversity offsets effectively compensate for population losses?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"University of New England","keywords":"Biodiversity; Threatened species; Population; Biology; Biodiversity hotspot; Habitat; Ecology; Offset (computer science); Habitat destruction; Genetic diversity; Population size; Agroforestry; Demography","score_opus":0.052601305770379726,"score_gpt":0.24341281152613067,"score_spread":0.19081150575575095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604787968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889826,0.0000047516182,0.0008269128,0.008958736,0.00014124687,0.0005150074,0.00010213818,0.00003917801,0.00042938304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99628794,0.000012588449,0.0013254139,0.001956355,0.000009825849,0.0000073884207,0.00021791035,0.0000023009984,0.0001802533],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992619,0.000035700217,0.00011684931,0.0002872843,0.00015671011,0.00014156893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994851,0.000031694344,0.00019546066,0.0002082188,0.000010192866,0.00006938171],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020972229,0.00011571342,0.00011170061,0.000037263035,0.0018724472,0.00012782862,0.00016388655,0.00006131779,0.00016830466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004676395,0.00012975036,0.00004904661,0.000040884574,0.00017824648,0.00057192205,0.0002106871,0.000046467052,0.00008230501],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052991854,0.000034020806,0.9855423,0.000014350818,0.000011312471,0.0000010904638,0.00009606523,0.000010590845,0.00038193096,0.00052714586,0.010979219,0.002348989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007601027,0.00004334129,0.98551655,0.0000072698326,0.000046686317,9.1513414e-7,0.00007505894,0.0015453113,0.00018184212,0.0005338436,0.01113032,0.0001587825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007692072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020302625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073053176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012115852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000027863446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611298390","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1364-2","title":"A call for more physiology at conservation conferences","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Physiological and biochemical adaptations","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Society for Conservation Biology","keywords":"Conservation biology; Conservation psychology; Discipline; Ecology; Biology; Engineering ethics; Biodiversity; Sociology; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.05833129403549077,"score_gpt":0.23724977672104508,"score_spread":0.17891848268555433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611298390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869006,0.0000047343187,0.000071544564,0.012337367,0.000034006152,0.00013853265,0.00007109708,0.000015581007,0.00042649984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969839,0.00001713195,0.0003650126,0.0021461162,0.000012159762,0.000008747124,0.0001018743,6.47736e-7,0.00036443947],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996017,0.000011037845,0.00006179422,0.0001773959,0.000055961893,0.000092066286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970245,0.000052398656,0.00008598643,0.000100620564,0.000017840028,0.000040693154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000045893587,0.0000592504,0.00007342365,0.0000052109285,0.000792926,0.000025554795,0.000120813806,0.00006153693,0.00015304709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000714073,0.000048283993,0.000026282807,0.000015956624,0.00049237476,0.00014798628,0.00017697626,0.000026159243,0.00006627363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018033269,0.000055192344,0.4477443,0.000014032392,0.000012308764,4.7610058e-7,0.00013425607,0.0000027592175,0.51089936,0.00082871696,0.038555253,0.0015729917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002992625,0.00004277263,0.96896195,0.0000025909872,0.000011556459,4.1339266e-7,0.000034305467,0.0009850955,0.004528199,0.0020720442,0.022979349,0.00008244078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014155558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032454176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5212177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022982644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000057032735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60986257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2691492924","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1388-7","title":"Building capacity in biodiversity monitoring at the global scale","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Aboriginal Affairs Northern Dev Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Citizen science; Measurement of biodiversity; Global biodiversity; Scale (ratio); Environmental planning; Environmental monitoring; Government (linguistics); Business; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Biodiversity conservation; Biology; Cartography","score_opus":0.04633108522029691,"score_gpt":0.2224894523681347,"score_spread":0.17615836714783778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2691492924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944784,0.000029318204,0.000014835178,0.004551902,0.00014535087,0.00014000373,0.00010240263,0.00001762662,0.00052016537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985419,0.00010375375,0.0009335405,0.0003405008,0.000009961518,0.0000012438031,0.0000035710384,7.280568e-7,0.00006483592],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920446,0.00003784453,0.0000770338,0.0002821617,0.00021087893,0.00018765139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995525,0.000025289188,0.00010390888,0.00025892598,0.0000046486634,0.00005476566],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019623408,0.00011076481,0.00009640924,0.000012000578,0.002544307,0.00007556066,0.00033797228,0.00006822698,0.00011579916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031771586,0.00010110473,0.0000354759,0.00005836187,0.0015897508,0.00044199705,0.0015865662,0.000081319,0.000426806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024557445,0.000020281825,0.9957368,0.0000033158685,0.0000069985663,0.000004373556,0.00025338508,0.000006979754,0.0005094027,0.000010596962,0.0028150433,0.00060827564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003528264,0.000013324419,0.9937733,0.000006475755,0.000019104786,0.0000021968517,0.00032546476,0.0000142132585,0.0012113531,0.00009757164,0.0040639844,0.00012017423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012221949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020866706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010135278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005551441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000015069347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99875426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748498433","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1421-x","title":"Trait-specific response of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) to forest fragmentation in the temperate region in Korea","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ground beetle; Species richness; Biodiversity; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Temperate rainforest; Habitat fragmentation; Temperate forest; Fragmentation (computing); Forest fragmentation; Temperate climate; Biology; Geography; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.05269590243495913,"score_gpt":0.22412704231223618,"score_spread":0.17143113987727704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748498433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98228556,0.000026316548,4.876421e-7,0.017337827,0.00004234103,0.00021244056,0.00003860116,0.000004523662,0.0000519285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992783,0.0000771715,0.000013207515,0.0005742406,0.000011357099,0.000003647078,0.000022456688,9.9049764e-8,0.000019535903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994687,0.00011029394,0.00009991425,0.00014639908,0.00007812853,0.000096602766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996706,0.00013654321,0.00007929675,0.000050203078,0.000046133064,0.000017214585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033229453,0.00006356941,0.000096053984,0.000025640304,0.00050937774,0.000049656424,0.00017890405,0.00008776743,0.0000070944975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005730313,0.000029570065,0.0000209695,0.000118749755,0.00015580513,0.00018654099,0.000068106085,0.00006680626,0.0000066976854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005963071,0.000043609634,0.9938383,0.0000037770171,0.000003624851,0.00000851326,0.0014096817,0.000001875117,0.0019124688,0.0001269548,0.00092802825,0.0011268281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028612523,0.00016848826,0.99498516,0.000013655323,0.000004725623,0.000001241177,0.0029298216,0.000005247004,0.00009268382,0.00009778074,0.001353526,0.00006156546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058204015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02685478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021034379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020328414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000045344186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749899075","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1414-9","title":"Comparison of road surveys and circuit theory to predict hotspot locations for implementing road-effect mitigation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère des Transports; Ministry of Environment; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","keywords":"Hotspot (geology); Biodiversity hotspot; Habitat; Wildlife; Biodiversity; Fragmentation (computing); Environmental resource management; Habitat fragmentation; Landscape connectivity; Fencing; Habitat destruction; Geography; Computer science; Transport engineering; Ecology; Environmental science; Engineering; Population; Biology","score_opus":0.044629251128892024,"score_gpt":0.2882046705208232,"score_spread":0.2435754193919312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749899075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98718435,0.000011783043,0.010707411,0.0011223239,0.000075269,0.00045769865,0.00009018072,0.000015614503,0.00033539376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993068,0.0000064331207,0.000282933,0.0001694125,0.000014043636,0.000021288311,0.00008096111,0.0000024562144,0.000115675255],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992437,0.00013619712,0.00017531919,0.00020841013,0.00011615768,0.00012025951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937606,0.00011470938,0.00022621549,0.00018418265,0.000043873446,0.000054942488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010783187,0.000085399624,0.00012702844,0.000041777035,0.00096131273,0.00008992415,0.00011401945,0.000050219398,0.000085353044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018831155,0.00009025906,0.000029945371,0.00005439744,0.00014262703,0.0004875367,0.00012394271,0.000041287352,0.000014090621],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029439865,0.000026729804,0.92275447,0.000017944021,0.000015366713,6.989602e-8,0.0004572178,0.0000070922474,0.003716865,0.00024085451,0.0016506838,0.071083285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034924346,0.00013642591,0.9925315,0.000018979244,0.00004875204,6.9254486e-7,0.00038980145,0.0018675642,0.0021097607,0.00025000583,0.0022027916,0.00009449894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032658025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084446475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07098879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039074133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000101149935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73937374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754114891","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1429-2","title":"Estimation of river ecosystem biodiversity based on the Chao estimator","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Rarefaction (ecology); Species richness; Macrophyte; Biodiversity; Diversity index; Abundance (ecology); Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Ecology; Estimator; Species diversity; Geography; Statistics; Biology; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.043311920807560064,"score_gpt":0.21713161266249836,"score_spread":0.17381969185493829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754114891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98911613,0.000002256826,0.00013917481,0.008025421,0.00006172837,0.0001308727,0.000308963,0.000015434653,0.002200009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999288,0.0000070795068,0.00005509259,0.0005792623,0.000002365722,0.0000013698098,0.000042881835,6.0141514e-7,0.000023326023],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995355,0.00002762987,0.00006655049,0.00012857238,0.00016348052,0.000078267665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995349,0.00004194349,0.00014989807,0.00022369956,0.000014670232,0.00003490507],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016672959,0.00006450774,0.00006903098,0.000014425254,0.0009173493,0.000046801288,0.00017623918,0.000044905246,0.0029706848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007086487,0.00005167384,0.000030913074,0.000038734266,0.00029023536,0.0001811785,0.000115139104,0.00003586964,0.0005961044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078741345,0.00006920217,0.95927584,0.000021646183,0.000008483797,0.000002050604,0.00019107456,0.000099274344,0.0002192456,0.0010089551,0.037791334,0.0012341705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032953525,0.000034341865,0.9801443,0.000009707866,0.000018517954,4.3198858e-7,0.00030021774,0.014227857,0.0010396527,0.000029652663,0.0037927462,0.00007302558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009289358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018452907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033998586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089342546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005433899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765587043","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1453-2","title":"Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España; Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment; Generalitat de Catalunya; Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries; Centres de Recerca de Catalunya","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Biodiversity; Forest ecology; Ecosystem; Intact forest landscape; Forest restoration; Biomass (ecology); Environmental resource management; Agroforestry; Provisioning; Ecosystem health; Ecology; Geography; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.013535963051067659,"score_gpt":0.18854538373062454,"score_spread":0.17500942067955688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765587043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99485505,0.000018578374,0.0000078018065,0.0026833739,0.000072946896,0.0002091014,0.000032258537,0.000012231066,0.0021086708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951965,0.000052840936,0.00002568369,0.00017520052,0.000009960856,0.0000011609286,0.000010134369,7.1800895e-7,0.00020463075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995552,0.000034889963,0.000081993734,0.00013455765,0.00011570452,0.00007769572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957263,0.000028030101,0.00018683913,0.00017314797,0.000011148986,0.000028190578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002662875,0.00006440166,0.00008914287,0.000022840617,0.0009954035,0.00011422044,0.0001787127,0.000038029157,0.00008117912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010340723,0.00004816063,0.000023522869,0.000033858752,0.00019604794,0.0004322648,0.00047021342,0.000030770214,0.00015201869],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007626311,0.000006659157,0.99543536,0.000074767406,0.000011963565,7.4248635e-7,0.00044492583,0.000009872505,0.000018844295,0.00053973915,0.0027158977,0.0006649772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010575803,0.000037882488,0.9693967,0.000030107907,0.000061720544,0.00000208417,0.00036448368,0.004491879,0.00004129949,0.00013151747,0.024294203,0.00009052419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007235805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005732687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02603863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016144597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000025457864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774813874","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1489-3","title":"Primate population dynamics: variation in abundance over space and time","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Wildlife; Ecology; Bushmeat; Primate; National park; Abundance (ecology); Population; Logging; Endangered species; Biodiversity; Geography; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.02353328295512065,"score_gpt":0.27870085806612366,"score_spread":0.255167575111003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774813874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963805,0.000020953301,0.00005379925,0.0018475191,0.00015318845,0.000115389375,0.000033855584,0.000019910285,0.0013748718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993182,0.000019291472,0.000099930236,0.000176238,0.000009217941,0.000002484521,0.00006277271,0.000001718859,0.00031016069],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957585,0.000034468427,0.00007938242,0.00016946712,0.00004025965,0.00010056863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996824,0.00002058978,0.000112096845,0.00014322015,0.000017975857,0.00002370942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014904927,0.00005912371,0.00008911525,0.000052636016,0.000288088,0.000057374735,0.000060041864,0.000106324085,0.00013550134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020480604,0.00006893277,0.000009528135,0.000022485505,0.0000576322,0.00029643747,0.00006015668,0.00005078174,0.0000690743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006530057,0.000025000967,0.99126446,0.0000067065243,0.000004964509,0.000004070123,0.00036600733,2.4994665e-7,0.00031218783,0.0063677477,0.00039755122,0.0011857636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000635662,0.000022178207,0.99735457,0.0000051046486,0.000015927677,0.0000030294948,0.000036507492,0.0009037615,0.0000063684165,0.00070524367,0.00023583579,0.000075828815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073753246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009385411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064367834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005510024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000057661787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775281841","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1478-6","title":"Patterns of alien plant diversity in the urban landscapes of global biodiversity hotspots: a case study from the Himalayas","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Alien; Biodiversity; Ecology; Biodiversity hotspot; Geography; Biology; Introduced species; Flora (microbiology); Species richness; Invasive species; Temperate climate; Endemism; Population","score_opus":0.03017577589911767,"score_gpt":0.22428066954549672,"score_spread":0.19410489364637906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775281841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99739766,0.000013299704,0.000005593075,0.0014172412,0.00004222152,0.00019105531,0.0008669715,0.000003344742,0.00006260011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99974406,0.000021266871,0.0000084500225,0.00020791744,0.000002666437,8.141087e-7,0.000012229522,2.0452427e-7,0.0000023773543],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948597,0.0001018665,0.00008731096,0.00013191316,0.0001226396,0.00007028921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995216,0.00010793288,0.00016699673,0.0001765383,0.000013331151,0.00001358213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026558564,0.00006112486,0.000099529025,0.00000798659,0.0010404947,0.000015448164,0.00029023268,0.000038421655,0.000029447501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031701817,0.00004210283,0.000025236008,0.00004519163,0.0002093338,0.00015299224,0.0006583276,0.000050123035,0.000007408467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052448075,0.00011640186,0.99004,0.0000030634194,0.000029595423,0.00006392515,0.0087997615,0.000004315158,0.0000029011403,0.000022913338,0.00081738393,0.00004726775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000577882,0.000059648675,0.98049074,0.00000323242,0.00006384104,0.000006320658,0.018603921,0.000070098075,0.000003062112,0.000048929334,0.00002616336,0.000046136818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09387003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10856609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014696061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000260468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004639559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.912164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889218138","doi":"10.1007/s10531-018-1622-y","title":"Seasonal variation in avian diversity and tolerance by migratory forest specialists of the patch-isolation gradient across a fragmented forest system","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Claude Leon Foundation; Inyuvesi Yakwazulu-Natali; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Ecology; Biological dispersal; Habitat; Biodiversity; Habitat fragmentation; Geography; Beta diversity; Biology; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.009651600581917899,"score_gpt":0.18858974235983175,"score_spread":0.17893814177791384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889218138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99878365,0.000019461968,0.000350833,0.00046574383,0.00009341559,0.00015502896,0.000055716773,0.000007436993,0.00006871526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99969083,0.000012808742,0.00008134477,0.00017674858,0.000006694191,0.0000018241943,0.000010537032,7.578604e-7,0.000018441991],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952245,0.000052926916,0.00009339222,0.00014373283,0.00010199615,0.00008547837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997635,0.000029037963,0.000104987696,0.0000572376,0.000024589131,0.000020631018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016656597,0.00005741434,0.00007136504,0.000011494365,0.000847052,0.000008149553,0.000059880145,0.00005567368,0.0000073244382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015869135,0.000052098992,0.000014424464,0.00011582074,0.0003301478,0.00016999288,0.00028697556,0.00003968357,0.000004559346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005004032,0.000023915658,0.99494493,0.000014112526,0.000006173143,3.4388958e-7,0.0041859476,0.000015957985,0.00013380137,0.0003219057,0.00025816393,0.000044734657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039107693,0.000035566438,0.98877215,0.0000141536275,0.000010616845,7.616608e-7,0.00049558654,0.009992434,0.000016555932,0.00014269735,0.000075656346,0.00005271803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035038248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039028563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03552474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008903721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000402727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9785067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914220295","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01702-1","title":"Marine reserves drive both taxonomic and functional change in coral reef invertebrate communities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ecology; Marine reserve; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Marine ecosystem; Coral reef; Habitat; Marine protected area; Biology; Taxon; Invertebrate; Geography","score_opus":0.046827466907065345,"score_gpt":0.18742756377792222,"score_spread":0.14060009687085687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914220295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969918,0.000024684114,0.0000014998888,0.0016680416,0.00006945802,0.00016066809,0.000014083346,0.0000111939535,0.0010585313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987557,0.00014235098,0.00004131018,0.0005051055,0.000008118533,0.0000057750167,0.000035333567,9.322925e-7,0.0005053941],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996654,0.000033512413,0.000065057415,0.00010157062,0.000055992048,0.000078492936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99984777,0.00002558243,0.00003658814,0.00006180765,0.0000056850276,0.00002256998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009214206,0.00006045119,0.00008385168,0.000027726697,0.00013195876,0.000018207216,0.000037696722,0.000028358601,0.0005171045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000032645446,0.00005891522,0.000009634436,0.000058480302,0.00009482908,0.0003138689,0.0004963066,0.00005015867,0.00010239853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043010165,0.000011302621,0.99553263,0.00001307863,0.0000042495535,6.995501e-7,0.0003911415,2.9829198e-7,0.00005179913,0.00012939853,0.0030610762,0.00076130155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003893349,0.000047454163,0.9927307,0.000008358864,0.0000043850864,0.0000014332265,0.00106723,0.0013984883,0.00000697314,0.00012391829,0.004146828,0.000074914955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040102955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03596781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004135148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003192624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002856679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9816233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950577406","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01796-7","title":"Traded under the radar: poor documentation of trade in nationally-protected non-CITES species can cause fraudulent trade to go undetected","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"","keywords":"CITES; Wildlife; International trade; Business; Documentation; Law enforcement; Notice; Wildlife trade; Fishery; Geography; Ecology; Law; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.015608666627444175,"score_gpt":0.1981576283668192,"score_spread":0.18254896173937502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950577406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95589733,0.000006575244,0.00011460973,0.04312299,0.00007098914,0.00059254747,0.000035295507,0.000016360442,0.0001432922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958254,0.000012027717,0.00025790243,0.0036287925,0.0000075304033,0.000011481294,0.000058895064,0.0000026328637,0.0001953506],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913174,0.000096873,0.00019426565,0.00022119102,0.00022119682,0.00013475695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960333,0.00012626633,0.00011124937,0.00011040329,0.000009182027,0.000039583378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018978544,0.000104648905,0.000119736476,0.00007416091,0.00014844185,0.000023276692,0.00013186902,0.00009537415,0.00043397018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022910806,0.00009416351,0.00002878942,0.00040158068,0.00012980202,0.00025899775,0.00005132552,0.0001020343,0.000060036607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012957094,0.00006721442,0.9692923,0.000012535823,0.00002429327,0.000001040629,0.0013951116,0.00024908167,0.02516087,0.0003549696,0.0030156209,0.00029743213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077089795,0.000084652274,0.99344945,0.000011095343,0.000020829622,0.0000014562788,0.0010366483,0.00040610303,0.0028184946,0.00023997386,0.0010475272,0.0001128967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001028871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051074885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039928045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014664065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031366417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47516692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955661309","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01789-6","title":"Evaluating the efficacy of translocation: maintaining habitat key to long-term success for an imperiled population of an at-risk species","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Habitat; Disturbance (geology); Population; Herd; Ecology; Predation; Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Biology; Threatened species; Endangered species; Demography","score_opus":0.04212395955486165,"score_gpt":0.28046332176934163,"score_spread":0.23833936221448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955661309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981183,0.0000061909022,0.00036383752,0.0007888881,0.00007053489,0.0005851623,0.000033377688,0.000010793913,0.000022925738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863344,0.000004908025,0.00085456035,0.00030787074,0.000011145157,0.0000071012987,0.00013881523,0.0000021397625,0.000040002607],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992808,0.00012061873,0.00017956781,0.00018877935,0.00013950508,0.000090712354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994074,0.00018236114,0.00018550629,0.00015304738,0.00003727873,0.000034385786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005848668,0.00006918429,0.000108898574,0.000028347384,0.00031440522,0.000012836152,0.000121531644,0.00005878033,0.0001514005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006797644,0.00006231798,0.000029222232,0.00012395252,0.000094052455,0.00037331044,0.000047355505,0.000034530032,0.000010665953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046544318,0.000039583592,0.98996025,0.000012018618,0.000009247224,5.09212e-8,0.001335165,0.0008074701,0.004638749,0.000097999866,0.000040770392,0.0025932365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007254996,0.00051787717,0.9934929,0.000011041317,0.000037385144,6.4951786e-7,0.0001916159,0.004060307,0.00080051384,0.00007344704,0.000013595271,0.00007518206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007833753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022739714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038382353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050115774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010895404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25412533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965764597","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01826-4","title":"Interspecific networks of cavity-nesting vertebrates reveal a critical role of broadleaf trees in endangered Araucaria mixed forests of South America","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Fondo de Fomento al Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico; Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Riverbanks Zoo and Garden; Columbus Zoo and Aquarium; Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Rufford Foundation","keywords":"Araucaria; Ecology; Species richness; Endangered species; Nest (protein structural motif); Interspecific competition; Biology; Temperate forest; Podocarpaceae; Geography; Temperate climate; Habitat","score_opus":0.029500923280617566,"score_gpt":0.18989747773331092,"score_spread":0.16039655445269335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965764597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992944,0.00020713931,0.0000017775651,0.0002698943,0.00001911963,0.00006271218,0.00008411644,0.0000049425403,0.00005591841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99988115,0.00002931183,0.00003270368,0.000020772946,0.000009264462,4.2489074e-7,0.000020248663,1.3440584e-7,0.0000059858007],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995846,0.000035270543,0.0001295837,0.00010360638,0.00006509805,0.00008181619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996338,0.00018705893,0.00009108794,0.000013005686,0.000058010795,0.000017041502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006985048,0.000053685013,0.00016991136,0.000013100332,0.00004089381,0.0000056029617,0.00006022825,0.000044535987,0.00001543776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048626083,0.00002798806,0.000032470783,0.00013981061,0.000113999784,0.0000623148,0.000053489526,0.000037706177,0.0000013697634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012538246,0.00003239863,0.89972115,0.000012220985,0.0000069283415,4.1906586e-7,0.00043614034,0.0000021563892,0.09724662,0.000083347026,0.000067998095,0.0022652617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012880893,0.00016044988,0.99359906,0.000051112478,0.000010136165,4.001756e-7,0.003613991,0.0005992428,0.0016569714,0.00007258499,0.000056260316,0.00005101038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019001279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026396734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095589645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000053189337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000031412467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28724375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966151708","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01827-3","title":"Lichen conservation in North America: a review of current practices and research in Canada and the United States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Lichen and fungal ecology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Museum of Nature","funders":"Directorate for Biological Sciences","keywords":"Lichen; Biodiversity; Geography; Current (fluid); Biodiversity conservation; Ecology; Environmental protection; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology; Oceanography; Geology","score_opus":0.22350958693356934,"score_gpt":0.33523051804897186,"score_spread":0.11172093111540252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966151708","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24807353,0.7470013,1.55717e-8,0.0042248927,0.00002373036,0.0005498294,0.00011790977,0.0000016374328,0.0000071856794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00074769976,0.997735,0.000001953986,0.00090552546,0.000007650448,0.000012907065,0.0005837791,2.60589e-7,0.0000052263913],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856895,0.00071479887,0.00025835645,0.00020292876,0.00013448106,0.00012049447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976264,0.0017922345,0.00040081664,0.00004049132,0.000109518776,0.00003052734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073315616,0.000099728604,0.00048078556,0.000043264296,0.000084328705,0.000020797983,0.00010654949,0.000061982886,0.000011646798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002607234,0.000039415692,0.000021754855,0.00077139685,0.00019374794,0.000088293156,0.00013551011,0.0002487122,0.0000016151968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070954025,0.00003772333,0.41196692,0.022702254,0.000029604069,0.000003383021,0.00024988994,7.089233e-8,4.773229e-7,0.00008805487,0.0024745546,0.56237614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018501488,0.00004042136,0.115608856,0.0035456575,0.0000683818,0.0000018499258,0.00041150767,0.000033002132,4.804673e-8,0.0000137674115,0.8800051,0.000086392676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87197244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9088887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8775305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006606813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019012266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16073252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980105262","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01872-y","title":"Spider monkeys, the misunderstood assumptions of distance sampling and the pitfalls of poor field design","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Spider; Biodiversity; Sampling (signal processing); Field (mathematics); Sampling design; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Computer science; Sociology; Mathematics; Computer vision; Demography","score_opus":0.07830569052443005,"score_gpt":0.28441199683506535,"score_spread":0.2061063063106353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980105262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98963284,0.00018264071,0.0043042065,0.005181882,0.000115383584,0.0002274632,0.000019852954,0.0000059630456,0.0003297629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889356,0.00006293659,0.0001674453,0.0007463803,0.000004044431,0.0000025958198,0.0000041641956,9.849564e-7,0.00011787375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996024,0.00008966776,0.000100771686,0.00009279835,0.000045239736,0.00006914678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992743,0.00046723298,0.0000927301,0.000119846845,0.000034329227,0.000011528253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002126027,0.00004499146,0.00010307776,0.000019000214,0.00011009677,0.0000071493932,0.00007753937,0.000061465864,0.0001631255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002383484,0.000030269908,0.000024876948,0.000045789955,0.00017750628,0.000046932008,0.000037328547,0.000054732373,0.000013251426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061697577,0.00008277348,0.96318173,0.000033062537,0.000068362904,5.1643417e-7,0.0027621738,0.0000040927744,0.0014618332,0.027046973,0.0036580812,0.001083445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015285295,0.0001156763,0.9920984,0.000009555089,0.000107992666,0.0000035687158,0.0027099177,0.00008759567,0.00043872415,0.0011129198,0.0017186003,0.00006853756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090677396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000081279104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028916672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005687195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009319894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17861098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980919312","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01866-w","title":"Evidence of a further emerging threat to lion conservation; targeted poaching for body parts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Nelson Mandela University; National Geographic Society; Panthera","keywords":"Poaching; Panthera; Threatened species; Bushmeat; Geography; Habitat destruction; Livestock; Trophy; Biodiversity; National park; Population; Ecology; Fishery; Habitat; Predation; Wildlife; Biology; Archaeology; Forestry","score_opus":0.026886655754773926,"score_gpt":0.22819853076816993,"score_spread":0.201311875013396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980919312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.983851,0.000037911203,0.0009585237,0.014362184,0.00011866179,0.0005362165,0.00001387702,0.00002643012,0.00009520161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946621,0.000022839633,0.0009514089,0.0040507526,0.0000103623615,0.000013310432,0.000024087876,0.0000028553284,0.00026227074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992668,0.000052025953,0.00016348078,0.00024846563,0.00012962484,0.00013959677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994685,0.0001859389,0.000121429424,0.00013173975,0.000043002336,0.00004937276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034260264,0.00009191349,0.00012555374,0.000048508417,0.00018738993,0.000015982268,0.00009979839,0.00008100098,0.0004570077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011300003,0.000097610115,0.00003584618,0.00019256193,0.000067058085,0.0004953655,0.00009412506,0.000047294558,0.00015725446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021956472,0.000023810284,0.9860813,0.000026680373,0.0000121403555,2.9696096e-7,0.0007608104,0.00007913229,0.006120886,0.0001921617,0.005894687,0.0005885053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041656973,0.00015504693,0.9926189,0.000049457172,0.000028932098,0.000001019995,0.00029342205,0.0023555972,0.0011317054,0.00027326454,0.0025483416,0.00012772241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010903918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029341877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010811118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004469067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001731706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50039136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982324236","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01879-5","title":"Impacts of an indigenous settlement on the taxonomic and functional structure of dung beetle communities in the Venezuelan Amazon","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"Lindbergh Foundation; American Philosophical Society","keywords":"Amazon rainforest; Dung beetle; Biodiversity; Indigenous; Geography; Ecology; Settlement (finance); Habitat; Agroforestry; Biology","score_opus":0.021483915412736348,"score_gpt":0.18024300814432032,"score_spread":0.15875909273158398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982324236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99882,0.00010865978,4.3317422e-7,0.00030654465,0.000034231787,0.00016589306,0.00049204857,0.000002007786,0.00007019644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993024,0.000045966157,0.000019403096,0.00041169758,0.000005895135,1.5710413e-7,0.0002136226,2.2893691e-7,6.2717424e-7],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996384,0.00009506731,0.000070901784,0.000055300643,0.00008116477,0.00005920092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999675,0.00014328073,0.00006694516,0.000085929794,0.000015456424,0.000013401483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018900551,0.000046681896,0.000061860104,0.00005262537,0.00011474527,0.000017729297,0.00007926191,0.0000318591,0.00014905602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002976499,0.000028475775,0.000014513655,0.000078106,0.000099398436,0.000099427736,0.00000892738,0.000059032765,0.0000020356981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009160479,0.000009271005,0.9975868,0.000011941642,0.000009314308,1.8787667e-7,0.0010282623,0.000022756343,0.000104561135,0.000082403974,0.000050436243,0.0010024578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018627642,0.00017971885,0.9933804,0.0000090676995,0.000008078361,0.0000015616334,0.0053744237,0.0001086268,0.00027028468,0.000102137245,0.00034361202,0.00003580803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011386512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00939624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043461616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000016051023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015570009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99519676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983390358","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01871-z","title":"Species richness is a surrogate for rare plant occurrence, but not conservation value, in boreal plant communities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Royal Alberta Museum; Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Rare species; Biodiversity; Habitat; Boreal; Temperate climate; Geography; Taiga; Disturbance (geology); Umbrella species; Common species; Body size and species richness; Biology; Endangered species","score_opus":0.031905891821433933,"score_gpt":0.20613330320687975,"score_spread":0.1742274113854458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983390358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994403,0.000019994819,0.000055878616,0.0029358838,0.00011777776,0.00031888412,0.0015910955,0.000019704621,0.00053775846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99615306,0.0001698694,0.00014491964,0.0025205303,0.0000043436426,0.000012195478,0.0006655645,0.0000013592656,0.00032815678],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942213,0.00005464504,0.00013488629,0.00014914644,0.000099983714,0.00013920198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995251,0.0002498799,0.00009145334,0.00008766614,0.000022728764,0.000023117393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020865336,0.00009545311,0.00013605264,0.00005141893,0.0003068341,0.000023743707,0.00009856403,0.00007784528,0.0001128647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017343657,0.00009814557,0.000024372706,0.00010375415,0.00020386802,0.00025690315,0.000110885485,0.00007519067,0.00005995234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014313405,0.00003216154,0.9908929,0.000032207598,0.000011549066,0.000001160979,0.0022853105,0.0000394931,0.000060503513,0.0010003407,0.0054565645,0.000044698416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008113888,0.00006071968,0.98027754,0.00002025226,0.000015816539,0.0000020032717,0.0033553976,0.010004513,0.00014692382,0.00026536823,0.004906318,0.00013378388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003234334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044539296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010615361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056317087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000137857005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48893672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984645489","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01893-7","title":"Historical changes in bumble bee body size and range shift of declining species","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station; National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research","keywords":"Ecology; Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Ecosystem; Population; Population size; Species distribution; Geography; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.06157236038063056,"score_gpt":0.18584466474950379,"score_spread":0.12427230436887322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984645489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99529356,0.00030840162,7.1178576e-8,0.004167417,0.00001969687,0.000051770672,0.000019640305,0.000007061326,0.00013239564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99931777,0.00034505734,0.000013941091,0.00013957774,0.000016017466,3.9541638e-7,0.000002879273,6.396883e-8,0.00016429694],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997327,0.00001309659,0.000052819927,0.00008998931,0.00005075109,0.000060692524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978137,0.00014951862,0.00003562071,0.0000050109593,0.000013348944,0.000015159032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007824234,0.000039549748,0.00009824322,0.0000064724413,0.00006728117,0.000008765976,0.000030071606,0.00003489835,0.000039506423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021366208,0.00001904184,0.000011146456,0.000063598774,0.000026723805,0.000053839492,0.000045029225,0.000025861375,0.000003410413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042142547,0.000014361924,0.9590622,0.000008214816,0.0000025445972,7.5597865e-7,0.00013674206,1.059274e-8,0.039915316,0.000068051406,0.00031665777,0.0004329884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013567173,0.00011351809,0.9884157,0.00001087454,0.000004513688,3.3666822e-7,0.00032470256,0.0000032049102,0.0002650808,0.000043616314,0.0106359925,0.00004675642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014682361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049557146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039650235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011562633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000012026953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27654052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994427699","doi":"10.1007/s10531-019-01917-2","title":"Stormwater ponds as habitat for Odonata in urban areas: the importance of obligate wetland plant species","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Odonata; Stormwater; Wetland; Habitat; Ecology; Environmental science; Species richness; Biodiversity; Surface runoff; Urban ecology; Urbanization; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.014879459863939673,"score_gpt":0.1753061361143282,"score_spread":0.1604266762503885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994427699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99574965,0.000018638348,0.0000041299754,0.0033203978,0.00006850381,0.0002131784,0.00014674937,0.0000059660433,0.0004727697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974891,0.000025362295,0.000038716087,0.0017383144,0.00000452362,0.0000017320441,0.0000759297,0.0000011428131,0.0006251618],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999537,0.000021319953,0.00008688515,0.00015040775,0.000082141356,0.0001222665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976957,0.000047679325,0.000058737023,0.00009168411,0.000008662022,0.000023697265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015786337,0.00006209751,0.00009241576,0.000025897905,0.0001050907,0.000013991047,0.00013050689,0.000050186172,0.0005334341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008800961,0.000048661255,0.000023716793,0.000069069036,0.00017015605,0.0002152095,0.00013360711,0.00004160885,0.00014503088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018754468,0.00001996693,0.9682336,0.000013263172,0.0000069214543,0.0000020619111,0.00065275957,0.000009139329,0.0017609679,0.00022353667,0.028871082,0.000019158348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006670819,0.0001140268,0.9679989,0.000006535024,0.000011046623,0.0000022423503,0.0006955657,0.00043497866,0.0017342601,0.00041434247,0.027837776,0.00008320459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009861485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056394637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046533155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040484225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006994406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5840729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001843708","doi":"10.1007/s10531-020-01931-9","title":"Inuit cultural practices increase local-scale biodiversity and create novel vegetation communities in Nunatsiavut (Labrador, Canada)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Archaeology and ancient environmental studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Saint Mary's University; Makivik Corporation","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Nasivvik Centre for Inuit Health and Changing Environments; Carleton University","keywords":"Biodiversity; Circumpolar star; Geography; Indigenous; Plant community; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Disturbance (geology); Habitat; Fishing; Ecosystem; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Species richness; Biology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.03096645766206426,"score_gpt":0.18610115418791773,"score_spread":0.15513469652585346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001843708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917157,0.00045012325,0.000018042349,0.007363267,0.000025946338,0.00008061566,0.00020533855,0.000010884344,0.00013003539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960927,0.00046752146,0.00011607468,0.003140148,0.000005848371,2.0637495e-7,0.00016759057,2.861634e-7,0.000009644441],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995197,0.0000617901,0.0000747439,0.00012897898,0.00010716514,0.00010763869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996901,0.000094125215,0.000091414666,0.000033887252,0.0000146309585,0.00007584106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008859913,0.00007888091,0.00009446797,0.000021037593,0.00046083983,0.000016911514,0.00006499506,0.000042466392,0.00007445377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002450673,0.00007467803,0.000009356297,0.00007858046,0.00043419006,0.0003810251,0.00006523439,0.000095352814,0.000011854382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009507976,0.000008337575,0.9918792,0.000023111199,0.000009904347,0.0000063487714,0.005941559,0.00003754759,0.000014875142,0.000009849625,0.00036875316,0.0016053998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039743344,0.000046969162,0.9767876,0.0000073244964,0.000019452025,0.000003012576,0.017926494,0.0020934097,0.000027138332,0.000013723986,0.0025823566,0.00009506712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7880508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92210793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13405718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013220579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003360235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3544454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034776110","doi":"10.1007/s10531-020-01998-4","title":"Identifying biodiversity knowledge gaps for conserving South Africa’s endemic flora","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Foundation, United Arab Emirates; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Threatened species; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Species richness; Geography; Ecology; Endemism; Conservation biology; Flora (microbiology); Distribution (mathematics); Habitat; Global biodiversity; Biodiversity hotspot; Taxon; Population; Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.1197108149383481,"score_gpt":0.24292839344583617,"score_spread":0.12321757850748806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034776110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990372,0.00013518326,0.00075381424,0.005865805,0.00010850102,0.0002324802,0.0006071919,0.0000885794,0.0018364484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99668634,0.00006212331,0.0002352426,0.0026694366,0.00002178473,0.0000046735336,0.00021359541,0.0000022308575,0.000104550265],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931055,0.00002908835,0.00009942474,0.00027367452,0.00011004874,0.00017723015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965453,0.00004132834,0.00007216073,0.000075291326,0.00002631383,0.00013039165],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012042341,0.000101461286,0.00010702518,0.00001944851,0.00048937293,0.00005885019,0.00013876737,0.00007459807,0.003502255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060296563,0.00011390745,0.00005499385,0.00018179846,0.00015355455,0.00024101771,0.00026847233,0.000060452527,0.0012857852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014032639,0.00004381677,0.7409514,0.000082809776,0.000022973398,0.000003196314,0.010952544,0.0000011649732,0.007372511,0.0002671336,0.23979717,0.00036494958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002410802,0.00013841833,0.5405956,0.000017694541,0.00016058641,0.0000030241993,0.03339629,0.0008209767,0.0031056434,0.0001492355,0.4186164,0.00058536266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001577081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010049891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20035583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012875364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001002934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043770668","doi":"10.1007/s10531-020-02008-3","title":"No statistical support for wolf control and maternal penning as conservation measures for endangered mountain caribou","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia; University of Victoria; University of Alberta; Raincoast Conservation Foundation; Coquitlam College","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Ecotype; Endangered species; Geography; Ecology; Population; Habitat; Adaptive management; Wildlife management; Threatened species; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.021918338701736775,"score_gpt":0.21746868339356829,"score_spread":0.19555034469183152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043770668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9590468,0.000012335796,0.023023805,0.016469656,0.00007740822,0.0006934821,0.0005469958,0.00003954621,0.000089995236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727421,0.00001587727,0.0041131363,0.022513488,0.0000491737,0.00005505394,0.00034730468,0.0000053411477,0.00015854802],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999215,0.000049236147,0.00016303491,0.00028344474,0.00012003741,0.00016921315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942607,0.00025604182,0.0001014546,0.00005247687,0.00005902768,0.00010492563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002734001,0.00011192396,0.00014659314,0.00001760617,0.00040426888,0.000055016866,0.00006819283,0.000106494525,0.00018796761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029961977,0.00012194024,0.000026011969,0.000049766204,0.0001842891,0.0002951183,0.00004652561,0.000056131314,0.000055445496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008779826,0.0000149368525,0.9679976,0.000037332404,0.000027027192,0.0000020868638,0.00033598577,0.0000048578104,0.0016354225,0.0010229008,0.026982864,0.0010610124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00225195,0.00037305607,0.943558,0.0000048051484,0.000094699644,0.0000047376925,0.00017881315,0.008569067,0.00020522236,0.0006465285,0.04394359,0.0001695275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013349272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002820526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02443959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045957182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000319002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49725786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081657399","doi":"10.1007/s10531-020-02038-x","title":"Southern Canada’s crisis ecoregions: identifying the most significant and threatened places for biodiversity conservation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; University of Waterloo; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Ministry of Environment - Saskatchewan; University of Toronto; Dalhousie University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Nature Conservancy of Canada; Ministry of Environment; Wildlife Conservation Society; Nature Conservancy; University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Biodiversity; Threatened species; Geography; Measurement of biodiversity; Habitat; Environmental resource management; Biodiversity hotspot; Ecoregion; Conservation biology; Global biodiversity; Ecology; Biodiversity conservation; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.0346444573388222,"score_gpt":0.19873734423693515,"score_spread":0.16409288689811294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081657399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8832992,0.000048991744,0.00079603214,0.11533824,0.00004203789,0.00024085618,0.00018575115,0.000017843393,0.000031070027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98475903,0.000112346715,0.00016609141,0.014853366,0.0000067598653,0.0000060619136,0.0000561497,0.0000012448721,0.00003893427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946356,0.00004716721,0.00009087641,0.00020550862,0.00008957423,0.00010331831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961895,0.00016458018,0.00008682929,0.00005168384,0.000028531962,0.00004945091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014021753,0.00008118274,0.000086418695,0.000010456495,0.0012063317,0.00003512366,0.0000800097,0.000045231314,0.000036176465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006837548,0.00006900567,0.000016541459,0.00009089733,0.00020997149,0.00015232201,0.00011652178,0.000055254084,0.0000163779],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068049885,0.000006672524,0.9311404,0.0000147869905,0.00002841265,0.0000012636082,0.002264458,0.000031008945,0.00011425903,0.00009961631,0.06613647,0.000094575465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082117633,0.00006905151,0.95120436,0.0000048418933,0.00013167904,0.0000015246444,0.030120123,0.0067630443,0.00011581482,0.0005191689,0.010036268,0.00021295332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19797722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40513575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20715854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043501932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003125487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9278249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092232286","doi":"10.1007/s10531-020-02061-y","title":"Unexpected high forest turtle diversity in hill forests in northern Vietnam","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Threatened species; Evergreen forest; IUCN Red List; Turtle (robot); Geography; Fauna; Endangered species; Ecology; Bamboo; Critically endangered; Near-threatened species; Biodiversity; Evergreen; Habitat; Agroforestry; Biology","score_opus":0.02122470571562577,"score_gpt":0.18148564449108534,"score_spread":0.16026093877545958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092232286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903249,0.00001608378,0.00004321114,0.009234866,0.000035513058,0.00015187783,0.0000142089075,0.00002557621,0.00015372489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99768543,0.000012917352,0.000050054903,0.0021643862,0.000008084703,0.0000021025164,0.000055957487,0.0000013297158,0.000019748335],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936974,0.00007064528,0.000109738,0.00023314208,0.00009052761,0.00012621682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978626,0.00003387689,0.000052499287,0.00006368948,0.000008604894,0.00005507074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010852558,0.00008157547,0.00009689143,0.000029633444,0.00015585829,0.000009478178,0.00011050913,0.00010493015,0.000107566724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049536124,0.000086400665,0.000018206276,0.0002635595,0.000111097295,0.00024310479,0.00029150225,0.000099284574,0.00013420223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011635897,0.00002694874,0.9973642,0.00000434727,0.0000026921375,0.000010405094,0.0008063577,0.00010880826,0.0002390709,0.00007640164,0.00065499573,0.0005893688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006739098,0.000040895735,0.9964955,0.0000043501004,0.000005669076,5.9193974e-7,0.00021422913,0.0012036319,0.000043181677,0.0003920282,0.000822734,0.00010332123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069075436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.110751815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10384427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074815835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000085336005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108886514","doi":"10.1007/s10531-020-02086-3","title":"Response to O’Connell et al. (2020): There are multiple ways to adapt taxonomy to conservation goals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Taxonomy (biology); Biodiversity conservation; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Geography; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.08827944417919595,"score_gpt":0.22373430076128625,"score_spread":0.1354548565820903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108886514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72605544,0.0000072750518,0.0017906866,0.27065745,0.000043489268,0.0005803396,0.0004172834,0.000054156775,0.00039388397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7142577,0.000018342736,0.00072304753,0.2847403,0.000009223878,0.000050381746,0.00009429266,0.000004233947,0.000102474536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990287,0.0000738819,0.00013805358,0.00037566322,0.00019875313,0.00018495493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932367,0.000098087134,0.00006402846,0.00013932369,0.000039930113,0.00033496856],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002629084,0.00012956586,0.00012851163,0.000027307573,0.00023792013,0.000072083254,0.00015399673,0.000054794746,0.004591253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003223132,0.00014061845,0.000033449232,0.00038531062,0.000047647758,0.00020866946,0.00028700274,0.000060676415,0.0038873313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092856295,0.000030394745,0.26110595,0.0000047130425,0.0000060130665,0.0000064481223,0.00082927715,0.000037582733,0.014078832,0.000094041454,0.722549,0.0003291692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002981635,0.00009992982,0.41485044,0.000005931376,0.0000053523895,5.8750885e-7,0.0024611198,0.000088078574,0.0008697052,0.0000033936167,0.5811916,0.00012571437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010827383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013255681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15374449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020335126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013173088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126266109","doi":"10.1007/s10531-021-02114-w","title":"Short term, but high risk of predation for endangered mountain caribou during seasonal migration","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Geography; Ecology; Predation; Endangered species; Ungulate; Woodland caribou; Range (aeronautics); Abundance (ecology); Camera trap; Population; Subspecies; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.01216992768786329,"score_gpt":0.19024674807946498,"score_spread":0.1780768203916017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126266109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99707013,0.000013920787,0.0008653789,0.0014728038,0.000065251435,0.0001796445,0.00029473114,0.000016845255,0.00002129778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99824667,0.000051072904,0.0008042192,0.00017522734,0.000016179278,0.000010484337,0.0005694311,0.0000017108175,0.00012498972],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941903,0.00006386575,0.00012396973,0.00019532212,0.000106344916,0.00009145023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967575,0.00006703644,0.00009125328,0.000086038875,0.000050085233,0.000029848681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014620909,0.0000681339,0.000086008506,0.00001992587,0.00028679028,0.000016031921,0.000045987807,0.0000907018,0.000105201696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007445707,0.00007868786,0.000032471482,0.00009654447,0.000087545886,0.00030318263,0.000056831217,0.000044494296,0.000008638148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009526727,0.00003482041,0.9891633,0.000018929493,0.000021353606,0.0000010710354,0.0002176501,0.00003750017,0.008375296,0.0000874406,0.0008150428,0.0011323224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041272707,0.000030066643,0.98522127,0.000005552588,0.00006729914,0.0000025357,0.00020015727,0.00086692016,0.012647771,0.00021071626,0.00025386942,0.00008111242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014868133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024462445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004272475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006962705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020437505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32087976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130187957","doi":"10.1007/s10531-021-02119-5","title":"Local ecological knowledge to assist conservation status assessments in data poor contexts: a case study with the threatened sharks of the Brazilian Northeast","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Instituto Serrapilheira; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Threatened species; Data deficient; Conservation status; Near-threatened species; Conservation-dependent species; Biodiversity; Endangered species; Geography; Ecology; IUCN protected area categories; Fishery; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Global biodiversity; Critically endangered; Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science; Habitat","score_opus":0.03517318636342088,"score_gpt":0.27170251933226797,"score_spread":0.2365293329688471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130187957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99363035,0.00001171358,0.00012393037,0.00551638,0.00004549631,0.00036751028,0.00007667903,0.0000059076533,0.00022204572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799275,0.000002913703,0.000058249305,0.0017599671,0.000003017457,0.000006921928,0.000057995163,0.0000011608546,0.000117014],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991046,0.0002933812,0.00011824038,0.00026951928,0.00008375775,0.00013045389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994938,0.000108937886,0.00006082546,0.00026382087,0.0000351105,0.000037546877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030171548,0.000080403974,0.00011539741,0.000014332352,0.0002713975,0.000014267932,0.00019446765,0.00006424793,0.00014653304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004533812,0.000048338345,0.00001226541,0.00023899678,0.00036056477,0.0001291895,0.00076149084,0.00009758386,0.000018041781],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001810414,0.00031592287,0.99565786,0.0000033689043,0.000021554904,0.000094016745,0.0004661558,0.000008738904,0.00007511234,0.000033733202,0.0014536612,0.0016888247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007870735,0.00020088228,0.991001,0.000004184338,0.00004041141,0.00006277427,0.0052192975,0.00043327475,0.00003347369,0.000011166858,0.0021410102,0.00006542294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011991202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34974736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33775616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056867197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006333902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145343671","doi":"10.1007/s10531-021-02162-2","title":"Garry oak ecosystem stand history in Southwest British Columbia, Canada: implications of environmental change and indigenous land use for ecological restoration and population recovery","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada; Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions","keywords":"Edaphic; Geography; Marsh; Ecology; Ecosystem; Population; Wetland","score_opus":0.02486955900795022,"score_gpt":0.16640877555615555,"score_spread":0.14153921654820534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145343671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979312,0.00028881896,0.000007324487,0.00017079213,0.000063653104,0.00045553432,0.0010713162,0.000005876487,0.0000055065734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99922335,0.00015430833,0.000087375134,0.00021873122,0.0000072596217,0.000018056398,0.00025390988,0.000002226759,0.000034806566],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940836,0.00006946208,0.00013912214,0.00021028417,0.00008251524,0.00009025784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968314,0.000094552975,0.00010434121,0.000065506065,0.000008586435,0.000043865413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014533065,0.000051922165,0.000116840354,0.000015586606,0.00014819953,0.000041128595,0.00002502342,0.00007588138,0.000037217946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035953097,0.00008070141,0.000010308153,0.000042384352,0.00004561885,0.0003080647,0.00005068392,0.000034227734,5.82711e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001368025,0.000031495278,0.9965129,0.00004414068,0.000004268538,0.0000041049298,0.00022628845,0.0000014658036,0.00046614147,8.513428e-7,0.0010550648,0.0016396333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003790324,0.00005532377,0.99542713,0.000018020322,0.0000144092055,0.000013799769,0.00016503267,0.00016721245,0.000006553318,0.000011620563,0.0036576816,0.00008419916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8100895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98986095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1797714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005851665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004157933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3290908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157148479","doi":"10.1007/s10531-021-02188-6","title":"State of seahorse fisheries in India, nearly two decades after they were banned","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Aquatic life and conservation","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Ocean Park Conservation Foundation, Hong Kong; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Seahorse; Fishery; Fishing; Bycatch; Context (archaeology); Geography; Habitat; Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.020928885482236825,"score_gpt":0.1935994235844044,"score_spread":0.1726705381021676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157148479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954265,0.00009192455,0.0000022823308,0.0042177304,0.000023971888,0.00006947258,0.0000643538,0.00001061628,0.00009314591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986408,0.00007761288,0.000064394684,0.0010148719,0.0000117437285,0.0000027039932,0.000074699674,1.7763976e-7,0.0001130202],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947983,0.000068609836,0.00013402481,0.00013440434,0.00009478343,0.00008836707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999714,0.000084500054,0.000065030705,0.000029794943,0.00007855339,0.000028105618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000117935626,0.000059779613,0.00009632001,0.0000105624995,0.000074341726,0.00003541248,0.000049283117,0.000041503434,0.00011703591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003457636,0.00003157458,0.000025931182,0.00015692161,0.0000491777,0.00023089413,0.000047669513,0.00004423458,0.000009628189],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079815705,0.00003077394,0.98019683,0.000008255418,0.0000067315973,0.000008286043,0.0005684661,3.1781798e-7,0.0067467303,0.00005505246,0.00020860053,0.01209015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019709849,0.0000413984,0.9940621,0.000016381051,0.0000081353455,0.0000010352661,0.00082915573,0.000041642666,0.0021113155,0.00074483827,0.0018746577,0.000072197494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027137732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008108374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013865325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009016188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001813453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45246628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165624877","doi":"10.1007/s10531-021-02206-7","title":"Correlates of extinction vulnerability in Canadian’s prairie ecoregion","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ecoregion; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Vulnerability (computing); Habitat; Biodiversity; Threatened species; Ecology; Geography; Predictability; Biology; Taxon; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Statistics","score_opus":0.015082516974654207,"score_gpt":0.2018655737752892,"score_spread":0.18678305680063498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165624877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956423,0.00002777019,0.000033233602,0.0029623166,0.000053590305,0.00004268304,0.000006810451,0.000003920781,0.0012273572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995384,0.000032092466,0.000078300625,0.00024882267,0.000001240651,0.0000010384296,0.000018318951,3.6344164e-7,0.00008137993],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996953,0.000038630573,0.000066415894,0.00009938013,0.000034600016,0.000065646665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998452,0.000040711206,0.00003226607,0.000039618637,0.000015923282,0.000026245956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012416572,0.000029977406,0.000049250095,0.000019977111,0.00011064939,0.0000030588872,0.000018775605,0.000046904708,0.0001948564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006754546,0.000033946486,0.00000961487,0.0001037836,0.00011121046,0.00010344084,0.00003164975,0.000038366074,0.000023562665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070694464,0.000016426957,0.9984926,0.000004561169,0.0000025482718,0.0000024897615,0.00024334308,0.00007153918,0.000072570845,0.00024255004,0.00048844935,0.00035585172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014111353,0.000011182354,0.9961415,0.0000023674538,0.000005246781,0.0000014276983,0.00022627723,0.0014370515,0.00008087916,0.00068697357,0.0012318805,0.000034102195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06686527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78884006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7219748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008338498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025925221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9393485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214256792","doi":"10.1007/s10531-021-02321-5","title":"Population structure of a grassland songbird (Dolichonyx oryzivorus) to inform conservation units","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Toyota Motor Corporation","keywords":"Population; Biology; Genetic structure; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Habitat; Biodiversity; Conservation genetics; Geography; Breeding bird survey; Genetic variation; Microsatellite; Demography; Genetics","score_opus":0.019770958962203895,"score_gpt":0.22132101201800206,"score_spread":0.20155005305579815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214256792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975511,0.00006525526,0.0003818153,0.0014262478,0.000115153074,0.0001218104,0.00026919122,0.00000956286,0.000059881302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99587274,0.000036610945,0.00088093354,0.0014700004,0.00003095798,4.974988e-7,0.0015155964,0.0000027417627,0.000189903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936473,0.00004163019,0.00014777707,0.00020303417,0.00014059548,0.000102216596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992567,0.000010035158,0.00010170639,0.0001542072,0.0004078264,0.000069537185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005277568,0.00010152291,0.00012349681,0.000060269773,0.00018364703,0.000027310021,0.00006883604,0.00016293506,0.000058221445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104195125,0.00011401848,0.00002843476,0.0003143849,0.000037830767,0.000017009035,0.000105473264,0.000047248308,0.0000058972487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013674254,0.000014192939,0.90390444,0.00004201192,0.000041332947,0.0000012978292,0.00028571935,0.000069030604,0.086568184,0.00048301142,0.0073764175,0.0010776345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070622,0.00007163474,0.925032,0.000012437101,0.000041203875,0.000009377579,0.00037698844,0.00003739563,0.03603808,0.00019317142,0.037323873,0.00015760111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005776898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001210931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050530102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009532061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065966946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46495387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W335081357","doi":"10.1023/a:1022811010951","title":"Assessing tillage disturbance on assemblages of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) by using a range of ecological indices","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Species evenness; Diversity index; Disturbance (geology); Species richness; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Biodiversity; Alpha diversity; Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis; Null model; Species diversity; Diversity (politics); Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.02941387798063473,"score_gpt":0.24080616532621948,"score_spread":0.21139228734558474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W335081357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983081,0.000071527706,0.00008751277,0.00011137662,0.0000336301,0.00005756706,0.000012974271,0.000005161072,0.0013121114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995059,0.00004277592,0.00024839074,0.00016648046,0.000001340913,8.380958e-7,0.0000043098153,7.228082e-7,0.000029280225],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995521,0.00007270866,0.00010164361,0.00012229114,0.000082984334,0.00006830667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967414,0.00011296183,0.00013928337,0.000042465854,0.000015359843,0.000015771182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015182055,0.000057803732,0.00010955276,0.000018834418,0.00018442207,0.000010457251,0.000041421314,0.00008072395,0.000041875533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052833522,0.000054296295,0.000017797785,0.00009378478,0.00025495517,0.00018980916,0.000033811608,0.00004819614,0.0000035744088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011838005,0.00006774313,0.9966179,0.000014501662,0.000010910346,8.4115084e-7,0.00026581186,0.000041958792,0.0025331408,0.000170097,0.00011831805,0.0001469161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022280416,0.000057517165,0.9982084,0.000008692949,0.000021004094,5.5554733e-7,0.0004097013,0.00026418403,0.000546899,0.00008327995,0.00012001415,0.000056921635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002905437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021510801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001986242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032316366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005711405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22141388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W336566289","doi":"10.1023/a:1015544325763","title":"Spatial distribution and habitats of useful plants: an initial assessment for conservation on an indigenous territory, Panama","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Edaphic; Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Spatial distribution; Biodiversity; Canonical correspondence analysis; Distribution (mathematics); Species diversity; Abundance (ecology); Species evenness; Species distribution; Land use; Physical geography; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029189812077847335,"score_gpt":0.25156143628096717,"score_spread":0.22237162420311984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W336566289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967738,0.000007615381,0.0016560665,0.0007921692,0.00006838029,0.0002497734,0.0003788009,0.000014973404,0.00005844282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986774,0.000034100576,0.00032668447,0.00046263772,0.000012638635,0.000007976184,0.00046467746,0.000001448005,0.000012445767],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994668,0.000060955932,0.00011413386,0.00017628133,0.00009029621,0.00009154879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970335,0.0000722586,0.00009925902,0.00006305822,0.00002141008,0.00004068655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014177655,0.000073146395,0.000091232316,0.000022613525,0.00041165107,0.000016439217,0.000043570017,0.000076427896,0.0000391811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017877497,0.0000776816,0.000012778978,0.000030665415,0.0001992318,0.00031286126,0.000031285555,0.000043020562,0.0000042544953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082104685,0.00015987735,0.99386454,0.000012556085,0.000012867989,9.3707143e-7,0.0010922124,0.00001525267,0.00020664958,0.00018344123,0.0005371258,0.0038324525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063110975,0.0006132052,0.98443943,0.000005093699,0.000022114926,0.0000014901325,0.0003747038,0.012902728,0.00009785324,0.00028788403,0.0005356507,0.00008872085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012011336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003951714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012887476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051928997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000058358564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31677637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206123384","doi":"10.1007/s10531-022-02361-5","title":"Exploring cultural differences in wildlife value orientations using student samples in seven nations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University; Deakin University","keywords":"Wildlife; Mutualism (biology); Biodiversity; Wildlife conservation; Geography; Value (mathematics); Wildlife trade; Demographics; Wildlife management; Ecology; Socioeconomics; Environmental resource management; Political science; Sociology; Demography; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.4411213830356951,"score_gpt":0.3663276589375813,"score_spread":0.0747937240981138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206123384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997965,0.000059265418,0.00001311486,0.001340463,0.00026792474,0.000162691,0.00007642789,0.00001698892,0.00009814095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938077,0.00004673226,0.00008904154,0.0002968745,0.00001345877,0.000034264856,0.00006869651,0.0000011903998,0.00006896074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928004,0.00014904447,0.00013746142,0.00018092517,0.00013518828,0.00011734105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976647,0.000074580035,0.000055129432,0.00005343502,0.000025869454,0.000024536184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000109645785,0.00007103086,0.00009950021,0.00015520745,0.00044034226,0.00003726155,0.00008733047,0.000021201364,0.00016655639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016698277,0.000069314425,0.00002191572,0.00037004164,0.000041435673,0.000281481,0.000097719276,0.000100694364,0.000004646501],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021902308,0.000085744585,0.96649826,0.0000037644272,0.000011540338,0.0000035196388,0.026711425,0.000052098254,0.00005347849,0.006199768,0.00015779067,0.00020072803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043803998,0.000032327367,0.91176003,0.0000084845915,0.00001123606,0.0000023950183,0.08687348,0.00021818625,0.000002379902,0.00012502729,0.0004410296,0.00008741084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012004342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017881158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060162053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009071106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015831518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206195881","doi":"10.1007/s10531-021-02316-2","title":"Retraction Note to: Molecular taxonomic tools provide more accurate estimates of species richness at less cost than traditional morphology-based taxonomic practices in a vegetation survey","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":true,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Species richness; Morphology (biology); Vegetation (pathology); Geography; Ecology; Taxonomic rank; Biology; Zoology; Taxon; Medicine","score_opus":0.10217745160173729,"score_gpt":0.26796915114754793,"score_spread":0.16579169954581063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206195881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944493,0.000025287292,0.0020452251,0.0027756933,0.00010651803,0.00028746433,0.00014233886,0.000011002394,0.00015713692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99682194,0.000023047085,0.0021669643,0.0005377202,0.000004028728,0.0000231643,0.0003911532,0.0000020565903,0.00002990063],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921197,0.00013617935,0.00017913789,0.00026254734,0.00010072617,0.0001094312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990859,0.0004278115,0.00031869995,0.00008511531,0.00005042847,0.000032058615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003286261,0.0000952424,0.00014380983,0.000057233334,0.00018824867,0.000025570282,0.00006649221,0.00010845027,0.000056170473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044262444,0.000110199915,0.00002523862,0.00019776948,0.00018921423,0.00042201503,0.0000754471,0.00009105608,0.000030769406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017449168,0.00008110112,0.97696346,0.000026433689,0.000015932044,0.00001116601,0.000176474,0.0068892622,0.0150543,0.00009154506,0.00037362557,0.00014218275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044209204,0.000034707544,0.9855891,0.000014006164,0.00002770029,0.00000390516,0.00020828792,0.0075065154,0.0058193025,0.00006330394,0.00018050152,0.000110605724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077868253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012221428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011442745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020611713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004600821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68198436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221028022","doi":"10.1007/s10531-022-02391-z","title":"The potential role of public gardens as sentinels of plant invasion","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Invasive species; Taxon; Introduced species; Standardization; Biodiversity; Geography; Native plant; Ecology; Biology; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Political science","score_opus":0.04598608795611071,"score_gpt":0.16573951739783951,"score_spread":0.1197534294417288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221028022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965082,0.00020220128,7.050235e-8,0.0028161928,0.000017084933,0.00004023491,0.00024411111,0.0000050372637,0.00016689992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996103,0.0001959607,0.0000016047356,0.00006904509,0.000008246393,6.109988e-7,0.00004576818,4.04567e-8,0.000068430825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970126,0.000036967118,0.000056097633,0.000053839845,0.00009997914,0.00005185778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983674,0.000053139625,0.000062045205,0.0000069932485,0.0000292383,0.000011816216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012379426,0.000026166746,0.000045859935,0.000003733251,0.00053878117,0.000009478838,0.00006473645,0.000011447801,0.00007133863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000125286015,0.00001023474,0.000022681712,0.000056693,0.00004898446,0.000021956299,0.00013482849,0.000024581423,0.0000018539779],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015137921,0.000063267784,0.5635729,0.0000050292674,0.000028042561,0.00000194829,0.00018394849,5.7789595e-7,0.4203675,0.000725938,0.0070863995,0.007813116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008520058,0.00013185847,0.9293783,0.0000018729063,0.00001054205,0.000004185711,0.0045495154,0.000043155756,0.0019405094,0.00032219227,0.063492484,0.000040207397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048197477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048527223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.418427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000030442866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000031948691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41439235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224302126","doi":"10.1007/s10531-022-02418-5","title":"Are calicioids useful indicators of boreal forest continuity or condition?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Lichen and fungal ecology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Museum of Nature; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Colorado Plateau Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Northern Arizona University; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Biodiversity; Taiga; Boreal; Ecology; Geography; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.02470657039304807,"score_gpt":0.2077507831755975,"score_spread":0.18304421278254943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224302126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968691,0.000014202992,5.263609e-7,0.0022149615,0.000055624852,0.00009908323,0.00056838844,0.000018569968,0.00015955356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823797,0.0000075483917,0.000006438536,0.0014300392,0.000012583898,0.000004607794,0.00021006762,1.2131032e-7,0.00009063366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995537,0.000066255496,0.00008819289,0.00011530088,0.000094667885,0.00008188997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996681,0.00008969676,0.00015183138,0.000021381487,0.00003187316,0.000037102393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000120841825,0.000047758796,0.000097141354,0.000015642361,0.0003544291,0.000009244233,0.000085683496,0.000043318887,0.00049064046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027075579,0.000022510323,0.000026846976,0.00019705154,0.00009285058,0.000063423984,0.000110967165,0.00006279407,0.0000042026804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008330077,0.0000511631,0.9932086,0.000004089435,0.0000083912755,0.0000036222511,0.0000878855,2.7278784e-7,0.00043386073,0.00037465105,0.0051263995,0.0006177473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018679943,0.00017359869,0.9734335,0.0000011975621,0.000012741457,0.0000025868258,0.0013092848,0.000008519016,0.00011738136,0.00007857766,0.024619076,0.000056752182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013886897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032376563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019775132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017575585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008747196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5372169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234956099","doi":"10.1007/s10531-005-5397-6","title":"Impacts of Selective Logging and Agricultural Clearing on Forest Structure, Floristic Composition and Diversity, and Timber Tree Regeneration in the Ituri Forest, Democratic Republic of Congo","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"African Botany and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; International Tropical Timber Organization","keywords":"Secondary forest; Logging; Agroforestry; Old-growth forest; Biodiversity; Deforestation (computer science); Geography; Forest farming; Forest restoration; Forest management; Ecology; Forestry; Forest ecology; Biology; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.02428070297560566,"score_gpt":0.1944916245413414,"score_spread":0.17021092156573572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234956099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99780035,0.00008876489,0.0000018124734,0.0019178621,0.000009843929,0.00012669996,0.000020684814,0.000004702148,0.000029291483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996723,0.00008024977,0.000034517754,0.00017103682,0.000016854876,6.210591e-7,0.00002082511,1.3976087e-7,0.0000034512718],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996037,0.000054666398,0.00008685141,0.00011843806,0.00006320574,0.000073135125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996762,0.00016313099,0.00008533216,0.000015903286,0.00003976233,0.00001964149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010777679,0.00006366844,0.00010511965,0.000015969881,0.00050141406,0.000016538852,0.000032310174,0.000050983745,0.0000014338924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025074904,0.000028428694,0.000010301722,0.00008308447,0.00014650913,0.00016708898,0.00010393974,0.000049331844,8.280217e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005889526,0.000017084794,0.9935836,0.00001131565,0.000012595035,4.3408812e-7,0.0010321147,0.000011965707,0.0041723684,0.00034649836,0.00014820347,0.00060490204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022741052,0.00019522013,0.99727494,0.000012119326,0.000028519706,0.0000060266248,0.0012284116,0.000308271,0.00023906001,0.00041601137,0.0000116016245,0.000052426494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006403663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009514282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008873916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012972726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000018368358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5309193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238145905","doi":"10.1007/s10531-004-5064-z","title":"Searching for biodiversity indicators in running waters: do bryophytes, macroinvertebrates, and fish show congruent diversity patterns?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Biodiversity; Ecology; River ecosystem; Invertebrate; Habitat; Biota; Taxon; Taxonomic rank; Bryophyte; Beta diversity; Species diversity; Dominance (genetics); Biology","score_opus":0.019013516171111477,"score_gpt":0.21381724291171855,"score_spread":0.19480372674060709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238145905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99637324,0.00001298626,0.00007838028,0.002957201,0.00006805539,0.0003226898,0.0001014107,0.000025306574,0.00006073384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970177,0.00004961396,0.00034711126,0.0024317037,0.000011485993,0.0000035472185,0.0000736607,0.0000018227402,0.00006335498],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990712,0.00005498484,0.00012785626,0.00034691175,0.00014242518,0.00025661834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966156,0.000059242233,0.00007802962,0.000088831344,0.000010840842,0.00010147771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003837154,0.0001324768,0.00014697507,0.000116553616,0.0009681021,0.00005218427,0.00014036032,0.00012982552,0.00046438826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017594304,0.00014016133,0.00003105238,0.00015302784,0.00027277696,0.00056591554,0.00060078874,0.00015077596,0.000108387976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060479077,0.00005797786,0.9892069,0.000017233417,0.000010204559,0.000007258556,0.0016957471,0.0000072040784,0.00007967605,0.00003748506,0.004992548,0.0038272527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011528312,0.000064603264,0.99370056,0.000012722798,0.000040343093,0.0000032379637,0.0012686492,0.00095066597,0.0004281519,0.00007856822,0.0021025182,0.00019715156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027908513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025432024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004493623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014588903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011290205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74459565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242088379","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1369-x","title":"The conservation value of tree decay processes as a key driver structuring tree cavity nest webs in South American temperate rainforests","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Peregrine Fund; Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Neotropical Ornithological Society; Rufford Foundation; Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico; Environment Canada; Idea Wild","keywords":"Obligate; Ecology; Diameter at breast height; Rainforest; Nest (protein structural motif); Biology; Species richness; Biodiversity; Species evenness; Temperate forest; Temperate climate; Geography","score_opus":0.01287158675743803,"score_gpt":0.21937081426644953,"score_spread":0.2064992275090115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242088379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99645245,0.000012111968,0.000019896479,0.0025831198,0.000041637057,0.00014763126,0.00001327773,0.0000075925414,0.0007222819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99941343,0.00007990075,0.00014124357,0.0002330813,0.0000042610254,0.000004082196,0.000007883168,0.0000013325028,0.00011478401],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999442,0.000043332868,0.00013192263,0.0001582668,0.00010840052,0.00011606937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994217,0.00010545439,0.00027079106,0.00013749347,0.000037854843,0.000026700838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020247074,0.00008223352,0.00010982308,0.00002507103,0.0010656215,0.00005068279,0.00016241653,0.000042788317,0.000011119031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020606078,0.0000684435,0.00001756773,0.00009405985,0.0009452096,0.00033874172,0.00015336211,0.00006292921,0.000017741053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006475678,0.000011589518,0.9958,0.000011202634,0.000010884541,0.0000013629567,0.0025043823,0.000060912294,0.00013842028,0.00033796745,0.00005654385,0.0010019301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041612796,0.000042946223,0.9963132,0.000009332181,0.000015730322,9.097884e-7,0.0009911435,0.0011080862,0.00035441018,0.0003880264,0.0002800203,0.000080071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032318367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060542513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057310674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040925133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034531902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9566001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247150230","doi":"10.1023/a:1008950708167","title":"Killer Algae","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Geography; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.03647458134111117,"score_gpt":0.21267425128573691,"score_spread":0.17619966994462574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247150230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943691,0.000046512763,0.00005984625,0.002846419,0.000070433925,0.000068332854,0.0000211805,0.00009421248,0.0024239516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683,0.00007084213,0.00021571819,0.001901091,0.000020242585,9.425184e-7,0.00006696196,0.0000029038338,0.00089128496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999625,0.000023419392,0.00004976858,0.00011944229,0.00009077493,0.00009158902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977434,0.000017814124,0.00003194132,0.00007587559,0.000057028887,0.000042999116],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008984041,0.000054063858,0.000051460123,0.000050603907,0.00019080419,0.000026164724,0.00004528017,0.000043485663,0.00025626054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018451277,0.000058108362,0.000016489375,0.0001501563,0.00006597437,0.00021487068,0.000037915845,0.000034170538,0.0026995526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007608786,0.000023867904,0.8936216,0.0000027944059,0.00001153918,0.000008493675,0.00018972065,4.2214862e-7,0.0010443531,0.00053838815,0.10286346,0.0016192708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041772408,0.0000141494575,0.67404175,0.0000026833868,0.00001478358,0.000007461486,0.00016043005,0.00011742907,0.00011033184,0.00010753168,0.3249276,0.000078151126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069624616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011134853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22206414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021704183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010888456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307156803","doi":"10.1007/s10531-022-02483-w","title":"Flight speed and time of day heavily influence rainforest canopy wildlife counts from drone-mounted thermal camera surveys","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bobolink Foundation; International Conservation Fund of Canada; New Venture Fund; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation","keywords":"Wildlife; Drone; Diel vertical migration; Rainforest; Habitat; Aerial survey; Geography; Environmental science; Biodiversity; Canopy; Remote sensing; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.009208944017784314,"score_gpt":0.19501569953889664,"score_spread":0.1858067555211123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307156803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99750257,0.000017500462,0.000018262268,0.0012646952,0.00005962451,0.00009726181,0.00022903236,0.000014761439,0.0007962853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974933,0.000014090242,0.000043069074,0.0018223914,0.000007388186,0.0000019189047,0.00014554583,0.000001978669,0.0004702904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993858,0.00011132748,0.000112257796,0.00014654586,0.00016706028,0.000077010736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970275,0.00005959098,0.0000929543,0.00009090911,0.00001828561,0.00003548825],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023593355,0.000067754554,0.00008271802,0.00002829282,0.00026994897,0.00002085579,0.00007738936,0.000029847208,0.0018201341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020373342,0.00007329643,0.000015517293,0.00012690885,0.00013193519,0.00027183464,0.00013089732,0.000068162975,0.00010859037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003385749,0.00002489056,0.9778957,0.0000021993014,0.000013389428,0.000001512956,0.000439494,0.00010194457,0.006373749,0.000022132714,0.0144587755,0.00063235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025036748,0.000039023424,0.97119325,0.0000039449465,0.000014838211,0.0000015967682,0.00016407481,0.002654648,0.0001649107,0.000020025003,0.02540618,0.000087149994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013676112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015308612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013523025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062079744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020439622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313352192","doi":"10.1007/s10531-022-02527-1","title":"Degree of egg-taking by humans determines the fate of maleo (Macrocephalon maleo) nesting grounds across Sulawesi","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Conservation Fund of Canada; Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional","keywords":"Nesting (process); Habitat; Predation; Geography; Ecology; Threatened species; Endangered species; Biology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03540718010385877,"score_gpt":0.2292284934746844,"score_spread":0.19382131337082564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313352192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978692,0.0000469532,0.00007857193,0.0015094524,0.000066983725,0.00012836113,0.0000729148,0.00001359519,0.00021394835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988808,0.000011474827,0.00009326023,0.0008034426,0.0000061723536,0.0000061954524,0.000035742145,0.0000020123632,0.00016089332],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992351,0.00010023954,0.00017943261,0.00017234568,0.00017424604,0.00013862833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941975,0.00011229718,0.00031187892,0.00011626114,0.000019501478,0.000020314958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039583666,0.00008022078,0.00010912432,0.000016917204,0.0008997167,0.0000125975885,0.00019052712,0.000044899047,0.0002925985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003842155,0.00007663745,0.00003437336,0.00019645548,0.00032938024,0.00021957495,0.0002883384,0.000088412686,0.000005828762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055574787,0.000034221128,0.9916477,0.0000140574375,0.000008788685,0.0000017496951,0.0011019661,0.000040178245,0.0039855335,0.00004901031,0.0013058243,0.0017553722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030402362,0.00007582633,0.99553084,0.0000045222823,0.000024483983,0.0000071996733,0.001376419,0.0004048988,0.0006364958,0.000091081536,0.0014614586,0.0000827501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002412904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000784784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038831166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039518294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009682416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6919984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323075763","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02559-1","title":"Direct and indirect effects of agricultural land cover on avian biodiversity in eastern Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","keywords":"Species richness; Biodiversity; Agriculture; Agroforestry; Geography; Shrub; Agricultural land; Ecology; Land cover; Land use; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.011209998599224663,"score_gpt":0.17237986810188458,"score_spread":0.1611698695026599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323075763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99913317,0.0000061576516,1.3952558e-7,0.0004892617,0.000057293477,0.00010332393,0.00004438692,0.000010646109,0.00015561796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950975,0.000018017847,0.000003232976,0.00027145064,0.0000017682609,7.889349e-7,0.000025037352,4.079965e-7,0.00016952594],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996163,0.00003565121,0.000047551854,0.00012926332,0.000082026134,0.000089163106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998282,0.00006320136,0.00003427268,0.00003656936,0.000003714674,0.0000340159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005623054,0.000055831333,0.00008255923,0.000026925109,0.00010691912,0.000005004781,0.000040234412,0.000049783244,0.000041267172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014387031,0.000049686332,0.000009179992,0.00014539552,0.000089531604,0.00008626798,0.00007988594,0.00003997845,0.00007011389],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022266848,0.0000163507,0.9955115,0.00001109827,0.0000037569196,0.000015674303,0.00018457444,0.000005614611,0.00035987512,3.4484626e-7,0.0036163433,0.00025262454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036197575,0.000044000837,0.99751693,0.00000832678,0.000013972425,7.2789754e-7,0.00007984797,0.000005952987,0.001598804,0.0000015115388,0.00030490395,0.00006301908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11219398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23893891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12674494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052863885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009050242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.893718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327814391","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02572-4","title":"Plant community and climate differ between former islands and submerged hills by proglacial lake Ojibway in eastern boreal Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Geology and Paleoclimatology Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"Boreal; Taiga; Biodiversity; Ecology; Geography; Climate change; Environmental science; Physical geography; Biology","score_opus":0.02967313065467706,"score_gpt":0.2074775142795846,"score_spread":0.17780438362490755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327814391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99608666,0.00006434296,3.583127e-7,0.0017661188,0.00003641512,0.00010473972,0.0017407081,0.000012463762,0.0001881991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99655944,0.0002287256,0.0000031967093,0.00023909465,0.0000064481833,5.925648e-7,0.0029314156,4.8118204e-7,0.00003057472],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993263,0.0001648521,0.00008615034,0.00011702557,0.00008440044,0.00022126266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966913,0.0001672515,0.000028317585,0.000049165377,0.000014678879,0.00007143397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003348547,0.000071989656,0.00012390576,0.000055855453,0.00044751857,0.000020727879,0.000057453486,0.000091262606,0.000034147914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018246858,0.000064933665,0.000006406012,0.00010530019,0.00016246224,0.0001044351,0.00003909545,0.00017598808,0.000008864122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007646028,0.000003816186,0.9969954,0.000031475112,0.000009528489,0.000010378468,0.00039473647,1.4282719e-7,0.0000013602025,0.0000030249387,0.0019140259,0.00055966305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045935842,0.000046653495,0.99737185,0.000005991027,0.000008093261,0.0000053198505,0.00039774916,0.0003388281,0.0000068427225,0.000037190137,0.0012463887,0.00007571188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2672598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9606153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69335544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000011787512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034123248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7376196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360958768","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02558-2","title":"Land and deep-sea mining: the challenges of comparing biodiversity impacts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Imperial Metals (Canada)","funders":"National Oceanography Centre; Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer","keywords":"Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Measurement of biodiversity; Harm; Natural resource economics; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.048767923095653955,"score_gpt":0.19752923531325797,"score_spread":0.14876131221760402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360958768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969203,0.0007077987,0.000012658288,0.0014355109,0.000045351055,0.000054332686,0.000011064432,0.000084801,0.000728203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858224,0.001325175,0.000021744247,0.000044166754,0.0000069017624,4.1877036e-7,0.000009170674,0.0000010478519,0.000009125616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999706,0.000014950619,0.00005294095,0.00007481737,0.00006718081,0.000084126405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982387,0.00004800391,0.000021477521,0.00006374267,0.000014209271,0.000028707316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001372433,0.00005510775,0.000077230485,0.000061265884,0.00014071904,0.000016070653,0.000051150633,0.000032935706,0.0000029092193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009546361,0.00004560031,0.00001345832,0.00009060763,0.000063260544,0.000041409672,0.00008075452,0.00003460841,0.000010920578],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013382995,0.0000052975615,0.9877193,0.00015862251,0.00005739212,0.0000031539882,0.0037792565,0.00023765612,0.000045023968,0.00011933562,0.005626348,0.0022352275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002913238,0.00001911158,0.9784957,0.000019964249,0.000033374286,0.0000010412424,0.0038830168,0.0127414595,0.00006728785,0.0000102356025,0.004365108,0.00007233529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001337866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000062367966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012503804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006454555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019653417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18595268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362698465","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02579-x","title":"More than one way to count a cat: estimation of ocelot population density using frameworks for marked and unmarked species","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Scarborough; University of Toronto; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; Bobolink Foundation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Rufford Foundation; International Conservation Fund of Canada","keywords":"Mark and recapture; Camera trap; Population; Wildlife; Population size; Abundance estimation; Biodiversity; Density estimation; Abundance (ecology); Population density; Ecology; Statistics; Geography; Cartography; Biology; Mathematics; Demography","score_opus":0.031526988944675795,"score_gpt":0.2293088740014785,"score_spread":0.19778188505680272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362698465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99230134,0.0000027873878,0.0035329864,0.0036819845,0.00006245692,0.00033775938,0.00003690664,0.000030296786,0.000013500472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948027,0.0000114104905,0.004253637,0.0007205664,0.0000089317655,0.0000047886056,0.00012701633,0.0000022008123,0.00006871899],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943167,0.000033261647,0.00012553475,0.00018585873,0.000117370815,0.00010630624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964374,0.00011460386,0.000092765775,0.00007784461,0.000029526467,0.00004152794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028806398,0.00007309981,0.000109773784,0.00005977745,0.00029876406,0.000018199835,0.00004426904,0.00014196886,0.000034716897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012839807,0.00008372524,0.000018289296,0.00023844483,0.00010248883,0.00022816125,0.00008578775,0.000043376785,0.0000114429695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016100917,0.000017640285,0.99485326,0.000027052905,0.00001079176,3.6074923e-7,0.0005408673,0.00047649976,0.0013577153,0.00014646584,0.0012867507,0.0011215687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024709196,0.000038633676,0.94025296,0.000017863942,0.000037763573,7.776804e-7,0.00024955912,0.058251206,0.00017851911,0.0005518562,0.00008758401,0.00008620853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001680172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049034494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057774704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007034181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007193421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3414216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362700296","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02586-y","title":"Comparing minimum number of individuals and abundance from non-invasive DNA sampling and camera trapping in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Universidad Rey Juan Carlos","keywords":"Vulpes; Abundance (ecology); Sampling (signal processing); Biology; Population; Relative species abundance; Ecology; Statistics; Mathematics; Demography; Computer science","score_opus":0.039017062427842385,"score_gpt":0.23355159725589603,"score_spread":0.19453453482805363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362700296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961195,0.00002276558,0.000035594352,0.003470098,0.00003040694,0.00014596815,0.000019695795,0.000012391066,0.00014360803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881554,0.00012804088,0.0002030325,0.0007939297,0.00000618221,0.000004269887,0.000035044784,0.0000013097185,0.000012680611],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994022,0.000067129484,0.0001309251,0.00019302125,0.00009941471,0.000107293235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994601,0.0003503784,0.00009129647,0.000070655304,0.0000077667355,0.000019812931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003082709,0.000073809744,0.000119573946,0.00003240162,0.00024628305,0.000026853184,0.000078377394,0.00006945719,0.000025738014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004840344,0.00007037146,0.000012195672,0.00020378326,0.00022679043,0.00024310054,0.00010761567,0.000070750684,0.000015940157],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020213436,0.000011658392,0.99362826,0.00001130816,0.000010424582,0.0000017058384,0.004261588,0.000011188639,0.0009212168,0.00002750596,0.00062389346,0.00047106028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043203533,0.000013523577,0.99529684,0.000027922277,0.000019829838,0.0000017162035,0.0022108695,0.00081243843,0.00018202057,0.00063578336,0.00028847333,0.00007853671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031114253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014533197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026960375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014802776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008517469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47035652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378388883","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02637-4","title":"Why didn’t the caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus) cross the winter road? The effect of industrial traffic on the road-crossing decisions of caribou","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; Kelowna General Hospital; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Geography; Habitat; Range (aeronautics); Disturbance (geology); Arctic; Ecology; Fishery; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.03101704666417988,"score_gpt":0.22924880751239043,"score_spread":0.19823176084821056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378388883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97273064,0.000022213739,0.000015345819,0.026363151,0.00023809294,0.00045888254,0.00008347081,0.00001734647,0.000070861475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974979,0.000015280466,0.0000011807479,0.0023370825,0.00003381251,0.00001356495,0.000032598815,0.0000027229246,0.000065821914],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987235,0.00045425465,0.00020048441,0.00018498168,0.00026630386,0.00017045159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980725,0.0014292744,0.00016649446,0.00028496917,0.000021900669,0.000024841725],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013183389,0.00012121499,0.0001382631,0.000026358344,0.0016295385,0.00008136197,0.00036932516,0.0001296949,0.00013878831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003436929,0.000053671472,0.00009584835,0.0004090197,0.0013629929,0.0001392966,0.0001843409,0.00023079776,0.000043997177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040004007,0.000017364619,0.94026905,0.0000026597245,0.000046214293,0.0000013896289,0.0018303193,0.0006781018,0.00009837948,0.0000410392,0.051264588,0.005350839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073577225,0.00015538963,0.99183106,0.00001999519,0.0000782575,0.0000022931265,0.00054650527,0.0013619472,0.00036192493,0.00003975388,0.004798407,0.00006866949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035285293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011504382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05156202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034145418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002287345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380591240","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02625-8","title":"Young farmers’ willingness to protect species at risk in Prince Edward Island","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"University of Prince Edward Island","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Biodiversity; Business; Willingness to accept; Agriculture; Government (linguistics); Habitat; Legislation; Wildlife; Willingness to pay; Environmental resource management; Geography; Environmental planning; Ecology; Political science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.018085049491169132,"score_gpt":0.20288778236828603,"score_spread":0.1848027328771169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380591240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951979,0.0000024918206,0.00001965061,0.0015929736,0.000048474034,0.00023435238,0.000023255374,0.000032695727,0.002848221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99121636,0.000087344415,0.000060663457,0.0003684686,0.000011879946,0.0000060749403,0.000021222291,0.0000015448431,0.008226455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995428,0.000023385115,0.000056258737,0.00014981622,0.000105245796,0.00012253878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998536,0.0000139100075,0.000028713075,0.00006855725,0.0000028794987,0.000032326556],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015062485,0.000055179997,0.00005076277,0.000045314442,0.00018642285,0.000020699652,0.0000732097,0.000027153701,0.00029445483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002098975,0.000055636756,0.00001236072,0.00033537255,0.00006371916,0.00012422801,0.00024940245,0.000035183606,0.0018118885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029074987,0.000005287366,0.97511566,0.0000060969696,0.0000022127472,0.0000032768078,0.0010770794,0.000089113855,0.00014609809,0.000020338235,0.023061218,0.00044454125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016998137,0.000017866254,0.90711033,0.000004209248,0.0000045265137,2.4067776e-7,0.00009705144,0.0003246793,0.000062898755,0.000031783682,0.09210441,0.00007202271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005444874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009533896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0690432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062016865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000021281483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385350290","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02686-9","title":"DNA barcode-based survey documents underestimated diversity and intricate phylogeographic patterns of aquatic Heteroptera in an endangered Balkan biodiversity hotspot: ancient Lake Skadar basin","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej; Wydział Biologii i Ochrony Środowiska, Uniwersytet Łódzki; Narodowe Centrum Nauki; Uniwersytet Szczeciński","keywords":"Biodiversity; Biodiversity hotspot; DNA barcoding; Endangered species; Ecology; Heteroptera; Endemism; Freshwater ecosystem; Geography; Biology; Phylogeography; Habitat; Ecosystem; Phylogenetics","score_opus":0.03818785799354837,"score_gpt":0.2216999389047761,"score_spread":0.18351208091122773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385350290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997859,0.000015384272,0.000050715607,0.00038157846,0.00006303404,0.00033419405,0.0012286152,0.000057941765,0.000009507572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986374,0.00016937395,0.0002466512,0.00048064505,0.0000020097577,0.0000019056793,0.0004503052,0.0000027685103,0.00000896922],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982413,0.00026782442,0.00020886064,0.00054928794,0.0004104391,0.0003222674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930567,0.00014449104,0.00016503241,0.00022054238,0.00001695264,0.0001473163],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004746678,0.00022598289,0.00027408227,0.00025750345,0.0009006788,0.000035116107,0.00026547068,0.00011832308,0.0001264338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043479642,0.00025337414,0.000049670507,0.00064339064,0.0005974744,0.0004658602,0.0015697674,0.000113956725,0.00008624513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014887996,0.00015103833,0.99656963,0.000035103156,0.000021782409,0.000020768077,0.0011302256,0.000036292346,0.00083925127,7.5116634e-7,0.0005659417,0.0004803232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013322998,0.00016131173,0.9961073,0.000019575296,0.000048976523,6.5959944e-7,0.000480115,0.00092964,0.00053612364,0.000019880497,0.00010788624,0.0002562688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018023668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0109436335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070800344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014930216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005724492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386094101","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02700-0","title":"Uneven patterns of palm species loss due to climate change are not driven by their sexual systems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Species richness; Climate change; Ecology; Biodiversity; Biology; Dominance (genetics); Arecaceae; Environmental niche modelling; Habitat; Ecological niche; Palm","score_opus":0.11919299464294475,"score_gpt":0.19935300559726432,"score_spread":0.08016001095431957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386094101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901289,0.000035670673,3.4800522e-7,0.005118205,0.000039171187,0.00011735058,0.0045076655,0.000036708283,0.000016032367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991495,0.00023254138,6.704512e-7,0.00029947638,0.00005106616,0.0000036463273,0.00017595764,1.6166095e-7,0.00008700053],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995865,0.000022191854,0.000069819886,0.00012247794,0.00008171259,0.00011730305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998049,0.000057984686,0.000056838588,0.000011406139,0.000036722526,0.000032125157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000072364564,0.000064123116,0.00011838373,0.000009565462,0.00020816544,0.000027522248,0.00006975799,0.000038123424,0.000010870739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006718463,0.00002876389,0.00001780621,0.00013221492,0.000025782789,0.00006346319,0.000108678294,0.000022502505,0.000027021912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002859288,0.000011638615,0.9738941,0.000023382725,0.000008779788,0.0000049446285,0.00029428306,1.484757e-7,0.020675693,0.000041840794,0.0042875893,0.0007289702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005595555,0.0000798621,0.9857005,0.000024764095,0.000005777682,9.4292807e-7,0.0040516723,0.000021837208,0.0004266411,0.000002165412,0.009557669,0.000072234245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012985257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016277557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02024905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000057070815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":7.028989e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1962991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390616218","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02753-1","title":"Cryptic genotypic and phenotypic diversity in parapatric bumble bee populations associated with minimum cold temperatures","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre; University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Parapatric speciation; Biology; Gene flow; Species complex; Population; Ecology; Biodiversity; Evolutionary biology; Genetic diversity; Range (aeronautics); Local adaptation; Genetic variation; Genetics; Gene","score_opus":0.06598458992310145,"score_gpt":0.19973620080713061,"score_spread":0.13375161088402915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390616218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971491,0.0009002497,4.4731644e-7,0.0016549145,0.000019575624,0.00009879855,0.00009744804,0.000042318105,0.000037111648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952203,0.00014370182,0.000012247918,0.0001694202,0.000014722621,0.0000012672821,0.0000453886,1.8885079e-7,0.00009103967],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995676,0.000026346139,0.000057660258,0.00016529001,0.00007895108,0.000104143066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982536,0.00009112225,0.000020985222,0.0000069574694,0.00002522702,0.000030362233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000073839605,0.00007301832,0.00008761244,0.000021072983,0.0005083626,0.00006985304,0.000039503386,0.00005173762,0.000015838781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014976046,0.00003468627,0.000014580538,0.00027691678,0.000054898406,0.00013877236,0.00008410851,0.00006259804,0.000005888414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039912906,0.000025640255,0.9900896,0.000010039475,0.00001775891,0.000012493154,0.00021104029,4.6218457e-7,0.007551389,0.00053546985,0.0011187082,0.00038746148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012808756,0.00007862318,0.99846727,0.000025922693,0.000033488435,0.0000012225502,0.00024472937,0.00010752029,0.00003753062,0.00021124774,0.0005707955,0.00009355915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011765733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075411107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008377649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018608862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000044954427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42081168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390698684","doi":"10.1007/s10531-023-02761-1","title":"A framework to support the identification of critical habitat for wide-ranging species at risk under climate change","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Dalhousie University; Natural Resources Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Alberta","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Warbler; Geography; Critical habitat; Ecology; Climate change; Population; Range (aeronautics); Environmental resource management; Species distribution; Environmental science; Endangered species; Biology","score_opus":0.07109322196346135,"score_gpt":0.27877350445838556,"score_spread":0.2076802824949242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390698684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9671631,0.00007788769,0.0042910925,0.026642274,0.00022181403,0.0002909977,0.0010285022,0.000033519318,0.0002508038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761486,0.00021602285,0.00009106223,0.0018934279,0.000018095343,0.000020224319,0.00006743235,0.0000021501248,0.000076753706],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994613,0.000021183696,0.00011309886,0.00015822357,0.00012358579,0.00012259185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959224,0.00023024165,0.000034752222,0.000088008615,0.000018328392,0.00003639969],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002796614,0.000056799006,0.000057373032,0.000021825932,0.0003382704,0.000056897443,0.00006999651,0.00004455405,0.0018639688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012155969,0.000047394395,0.00004003712,0.00015340687,0.00019162755,0.00015815304,0.00012222858,0.000038380993,0.000362345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024209333,0.000094313655,0.8265786,0.00028786858,0.00003075504,0.0000028319498,0.0065115346,0.000009321041,0.006281185,0.054064218,0.102260455,0.0036368351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093981624,0.00005558785,0.95519066,0.000022399987,0.000063617306,0.0000013710936,0.003136902,0.0002981954,0.0011735802,0.0010883476,0.03878101,0.00009433869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010453475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024542338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12861207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012691662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000025569243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395683807","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02851-8","title":"The importance of native shrubs on the distribution and diversity of reptiles and amphibians in the central drylands of Southwestern USA.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biodiversity; Ecology; Diversity (politics); Geography; Distribution (mathematics); Biology; Sociology","score_opus":0.016741355998291053,"score_gpt":0.20613636423170356,"score_spread":0.18939500823341252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395683807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970893,0.00007930882,0.000021131184,0.002547278,0.000016584618,0.00008206757,0.00009142478,0.0000014468179,0.00007144573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99967617,0.0002171308,0.0000031329096,0.00008283202,0.0000012177959,6.5140756e-7,0.000006868472,2.639659e-7,0.000011751547],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969417,0.000049060436,0.00006955585,0.00007378074,0.0000693005,0.00004411941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961215,0.0002748857,0.000056409586,0.000041875748,0.000008660009,0.000006011752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002559483,0.00003316155,0.000047262896,0.000007434169,0.0002542372,0.0000065297177,0.00004931397,0.000022760709,0.000005212541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030867428,0.000018593664,0.000011144013,0.00007190834,0.00054572115,0.000060694554,0.000105276275,0.000038376504,4.354169e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021739024,0.000009697768,0.99175173,0.000010608039,0.000009790032,4.4207246e-7,0.005407627,0.0000041977178,0.00003471899,0.002496699,0.00012282784,0.00012990591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008467707,0.00003821279,0.99487776,0.000010418961,0.0000150598435,4.5073202e-7,0.003709146,0.00053037144,0.000047846712,0.0006098333,0.0000565634,0.00001967044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005347773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049529304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004418153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011574711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003413678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27638513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402700442","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02936-4","title":"Conserved lands unable to maintain butterfly communities in a biodiversity hotspot","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Butterfly; Biodiversity hotspot; Hotspot (geology); Ecology; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.019436239043342993,"score_gpt":0.20907859604751008,"score_spread":0.1896423570041671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402700442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98563,0.000055954577,0.00017259794,0.013139539,0.000077863595,0.00012498708,0.000061006256,0.000045836012,0.000692256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99567974,0.000079184116,0.00021342713,0.0037162765,0.0000030559388,0.000003930472,0.00004455755,9.743043e-7,0.00025883963],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949884,0.000067126784,0.000082323306,0.0001467293,0.00006996401,0.00013501049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997499,0.00010874995,0.000016688136,0.00007451173,0.000009163302,0.000041017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026742084,0.0000755473,0.000087007196,0.00008019637,0.0003007386,0.000042304448,0.00008779414,0.00005843037,0.0003222681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015079901,0.000079717196,0.000018836152,0.00022594673,0.00018602275,0.00019991594,0.00022213096,0.00008948882,0.00052624865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038017424,0.0000203674,0.9855186,0.000017360404,0.000012112854,0.000016065253,0.0024928928,0.000054140808,0.00005577666,0.0006060056,0.010960764,0.00020791538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027107808,0.000054980443,0.9770809,0.000018388424,0.00001635057,0.0000029321125,0.003102533,0.0018956448,0.000029863211,0.00070898404,0.016693143,0.00012521069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008967013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022643719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013676707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000954028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009724193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402812419","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02938-2","title":"Rapid evaluation of habitat connectivity change to safeguard multispecies persistence in human-transformed landscapes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Cégep de Saint-Laurent","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Liber Ero Foundation; Mitacs; McGill University","keywords":"Safeguard; Biodiversity; Persistence (discontinuity); Habitat; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geography; Environmental science; Biology; Business","score_opus":0.08448548618701776,"score_gpt":0.2683998948886232,"score_spread":0.18391440870160544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402812419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99447453,0.00011768511,0.00008461617,0.0040655374,0.00009816539,0.00036404032,0.00003288694,0.000023232593,0.0007393288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946123,0.000050949515,0.00009953722,0.00029283788,0.000012294133,0.000023255068,0.00002599687,0.0000017811196,0.000032119227],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992459,0.00007352944,0.00012924414,0.00021145023,0.00024544346,0.00009443963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997533,0.00006528881,0.000032695043,0.00007640471,0.000039159404,0.00003313418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046513524,0.0000759251,0.000090810754,0.000101810336,0.00012254043,0.000034577068,0.000058512585,0.000047865764,0.0004708086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044767472,0.000077632154,0.000033021046,0.00029093356,0.00006413341,0.0005893119,0.000040106457,0.000056275927,0.00005694922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006070392,0.00006934471,0.93706405,0.00004519677,0.000016209753,0.0000018456242,0.0046252767,0.000056091965,0.014161265,0.00016350884,0.0024178813,0.0413186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030409254,0.00007449398,0.98335266,0.00005946727,0.00003686978,0.0000017622718,0.0010855114,0.00849121,0.0010696367,0.00008656332,0.0053368527,0.00010088347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030754157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008571283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046288583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001403707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013948465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5155024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403551450","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02953-3","title":"Study extent influences the predictions and performance of species distribution models: a case study of six amphibian species at the edge of their geographic distributions in western Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Lethbridge","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Amphibian; Biodiversity; Ecology; Distribution (mathematics); Geography; Species distribution; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Biology; Habitat; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0473117025638754,"score_gpt":0.2157344873111216,"score_spread":0.1684227847472462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403551450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99687785,0.0001512511,0.0000071524632,0.00057590386,0.00004841856,0.00041360146,0.0018771837,0.0000068158024,0.000041795156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99965614,0.0002131437,2.6487598e-7,0.000013754283,0.0000031046857,0.000010666098,0.000072760755,9.4755205e-7,0.000029189478],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927616,0.00007347024,0.00020472429,0.00015136803,0.00020304696,0.000091222515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962926,0.00008868404,0.000089154346,0.00013613088,0.000032170185,0.000024597757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022306424,0.000082935876,0.00011059471,0.000024747105,0.0003457238,0.000022273025,0.00009476864,0.000023571767,0.0001301159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010645183,0.000053708583,0.000022461641,0.00036620276,0.00048605062,0.00017602972,0.00019983834,0.00006224704,6.920512e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002657021,0.00017293618,0.9956666,0.00002071323,0.000022753078,0.000007565616,0.0033610864,0.000068193636,0.00008184602,0.00006617576,0.00042288855,0.000082671126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021674222,0.0001727085,0.91337967,0.000014514043,0.000049459315,0.000017029577,0.08499759,0.000564433,0.00009226433,0.00000500831,0.00044228835,0.000048271864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22574474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7867402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5609954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001579558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022986507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7794111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403632263","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02958-y","title":"Mountains host significantly more data deficient and threatened bat species than lowlands","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Future Earth","funders":"Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Threatened species; Biodiversity; Ecology; Geography; Host (biology); Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.06786261739368027,"score_gpt":0.22130776793824425,"score_spread":0.15344515054456398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403632263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98026717,0.0010431734,0.0000027551189,0.01787179,0.00010981327,0.00007850036,0.00044184655,0.000050949882,0.00013400265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977747,0.0009357025,0.000011928235,0.00061206165,0.000040446826,0.0000013178588,0.00040455142,1.7011166e-7,0.00021907316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994678,0.000025284842,0.00006442205,0.00027698674,0.00004680949,0.00011869697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997598,0.0001235219,0.000018675395,0.000043016298,0.000023380724,0.00003160937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014040295,0.000080144375,0.00009156768,0.0000109051525,0.0004497519,0.00006167114,0.00010454124,0.0000885746,0.00005135134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017606742,0.000034118395,0.000014956469,0.00010367894,0.00024498752,0.00015109197,0.00022236358,0.000057694033,0.000021542743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000388912,0.00001858034,0.98479176,0.0000124172175,0.00003782284,0.000009491317,0.00024904366,4.2401567e-8,0.0057372893,0.000565469,0.0070255874,0.0015136177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066735476,0.00008261326,0.97868997,0.000007159052,0.00003633046,0.000005577119,0.0019179462,0.00019787301,0.0001267003,0.00008004284,0.018698987,0.00009004364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043798442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014346606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01750758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000083119385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000049480923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34591734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405528339","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02978-8","title":"Anthropogenically protected but naturally disturbed: a specialist carnivore at its southern range periphery","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Colorado Parks and Wildlife","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Range (aeronautics); Urbanization; Carnivore; Ecoregion; Biodiversity; Population; Predation; Biology","score_opus":0.013527926286242267,"score_gpt":0.1984573713280309,"score_spread":0.18492944504178863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405528339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890181,0.00024162963,0.000037386024,0.009149886,0.00022383351,0.00029273736,0.00014346033,0.00012189827,0.0007711016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944877,0.000055461293,0.00012768923,0.0015591794,0.00006712246,0.000011252232,0.00011256874,0.0000050303092,0.0035740032],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991588,0.00007016329,0.00012399018,0.00032543828,0.00016434574,0.00015724359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972576,0.000047660254,0.00004599777,0.0000997164,0.000019866573,0.000061017647],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013244881,0.000121606565,0.00010283135,0.000026027607,0.00049830956,0.00006603426,0.00010563063,0.00015256202,0.0019857478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043696517,0.00011516351,0.000050705145,0.00018364258,0.00028606178,0.00028750685,0.00017006259,0.00013164563,0.0013004681],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018074478,0.000030845225,0.9767641,0.000036616846,0.000033457305,0.000045130837,0.0011080976,0.0000042183387,0.0035726565,0.00010468163,0.016356712,0.0017627586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003408412,0.000051257633,0.9568631,0.000018342105,0.000052699404,0.000017913095,0.00025573646,0.0010174911,0.00010666917,0.000081959086,0.040985372,0.00020862161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010966889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019192166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02462866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015354657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023633937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406609084","doi":"10.1007/s10531-025-03012-1","title":"Local weather interacts with human disturbances to shape the behaviour of boreal caribou across a large climate gradient","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Boreal; Biodiversity; Ecology; Climate change; Climatology; Environmental science; Taiga; Geography; Disturbance (geology); Physical geography; Biology; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.014480742729234186,"score_gpt":0.24092221380189707,"score_spread":0.22644147107266288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406609084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99701077,0.000034364268,0.00005790682,0.0016048206,0.000018097275,0.00015181501,0.00009008136,0.0000081221315,0.0010240298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987103,0.000027206766,0.000036571506,0.0011430546,0.0000016099128,0.0000042491456,0.000013081269,8.36915e-7,0.00006309313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952865,0.00001920311,0.00007563216,0.00014051714,0.000097382,0.00013864478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998216,0.00001577086,0.000044273616,0.000081975675,0.000013123842,0.000023241502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013082178,0.00006392732,0.00008239892,0.0000073681317,0.00039241984,0.000018376044,0.00010572171,0.000018760047,0.00007113787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004933478,0.000043580127,0.000018746696,0.00012983258,0.0001708076,0.0000764913,0.0004800366,0.000039593368,0.000010459954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005983275,0.00004296259,0.9935319,0.000013193839,0.000011912124,0.0000013901566,0.0009949331,0.0000014217749,0.000017625644,0.00032685377,0.0030446155,0.001953367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021228493,0.00008282972,0.9877021,0.000020372752,0.000026305697,3.8754487e-7,0.0013426836,0.000049426333,0.000100472476,0.000013173636,0.010398286,0.00005168506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019507533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040131178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020623645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044098568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000028623747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9870216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406857386","doi":"10.1007/s10531-025-03022-z","title":"Effect of forest loss and fragmentation per se on arboreal and ground mammals of the Lacandon rainforest, Mexico","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Rufford Foundation","keywords":"Arboreal locomotion; Rainforest; Biodiversity; Fragmentation (computing); Forest fragmentation; Ecology; Geography; Tropical rainforest; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.00658607937768684,"score_gpt":0.2080215854001451,"score_spread":0.20143550602245824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406857386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971374,0.000017642456,0.000024614481,0.0022125952,0.000040825198,0.00021629942,0.000015084137,0.0000046245377,0.00033091393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99902946,0.0000331336,0.00002034199,0.0008061321,0.0000025237919,0.0000030357714,0.000010166347,7.114792e-7,0.000094474046],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995712,0.00008358585,0.000095601055,0.00011318989,0.00007972295,0.000056682085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996433,0.00017663113,0.00008600765,0.000068359754,0.000009487082,0.00001619757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002390542,0.00006168388,0.00008905115,0.00002677344,0.00016208553,0.000008388131,0.00004527554,0.00006501546,0.000021104746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040187857,0.000047680096,0.000016267411,0.00008729099,0.00034112774,0.00013296769,0.00008313027,0.000043201955,0.0000017556046],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000250465,0.000012719741,0.99653727,0.00003717862,0.000011753219,2.2784029e-7,0.00021605633,0.000015779246,0.00021901439,0.0006610271,0.0005853365,0.0014531704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007580532,0.00014939843,0.99676377,0.000019574221,0.000043707092,8.4703595e-7,0.00006542491,0.00024415925,0.0012968843,0.000348565,0.00026971084,0.00003989505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013470277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006592036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018920803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019470475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007592473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20363119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409205139","doi":"10.1007/s10531-025-03068-z","title":"The applicability of regional red list assessments for soil invertebrates: first assessment of five native earthworm species in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Emmanuel Bible College; University of Alberta; Saint Mary's University","funders":"Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Earthworm; Invertebrate; Biodiversity; Ecology; Lumbricidae; Biology; Geography; Environmental science; Agroforestry","score_opus":0.03141244171594327,"score_gpt":0.22137049178827545,"score_spread":0.18995805007233219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409205139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912018,0.00001630115,0.0000092633145,0.007928157,0.000043699598,0.00024892323,0.000118294374,0.0000022246945,0.00043130512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993175,0.00005493802,0.000037575785,0.00042361725,0.0000047852627,0.00001356145,0.000054738128,7.1447175e-8,0.000093191724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995449,0.000040494542,0.00014839848,0.00011552383,0.00006604785,0.00008461988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992903,0.00044455595,0.00010739018,0.000029005165,0.00011481049,0.000013933617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018667123,0.00005022959,0.00011397717,0.000008428364,0.0002446128,0.000008627317,0.00009572403,0.00004007612,0.00002556337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028517788,0.000023573253,0.00002406017,0.000149725,0.00012602974,0.000059215607,0.000047924517,0.00004026479,1.0598751e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009130233,0.000042118707,0.9881968,0.000028673756,0.000021840016,1.5971521e-7,0.000039604307,0.0000069364064,0.00078707526,0.002288896,0.006944577,0.0015520122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023283536,0.000058375703,0.98031664,0.000011632957,0.000007566386,6.4998865e-8,0.0023268787,0.0022562256,0.00074946246,0.00051578914,0.0134821255,0.00004239982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39249912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97152203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5790229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101860496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016731248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6115463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411061409","doi":"10.1007/s10531-025-03099-6","title":"Out of sight and out of mind? The conservation status of subterranean biodiversity in the United States and Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Directorate for Biological Sciences","keywords":"Biodiversity; Conservation status; Biodiversity conservation; Geography; Sight; Ecology; Biology; Physics; Habitat","score_opus":0.04585288695645411,"score_gpt":0.19014306947301518,"score_spread":0.14429018251656106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411061409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99506986,0.00020198709,0.000013166565,0.0034278946,0.00007944044,0.00018661143,0.00086074497,0.0000023206849,0.00015795042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998219,0.0004447195,0.00004299638,0.0009881085,0.0000020928967,1.2749675e-7,0.0002882598,2.092257e-7,0.000014451032],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993125,0.0001266677,0.0001656009,0.00013304966,0.00014304538,0.000119138924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992428,0.00039119672,0.00014976387,0.00009708571,0.000086582026,0.00003256798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025962933,0.00008381987,0.0001497161,0.00011361957,0.00019882307,0.00001742612,0.00012284868,0.000053019154,0.000047542682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039127302,0.000061560226,0.000017998243,0.00018870516,0.00045282548,0.0001286628,0.00003439657,0.0000709696,6.947574e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017079923,0.0000121045605,0.9933545,0.00006758363,0.000029365845,0.000001833405,0.0031281104,0.000009211795,0.000018441882,0.000019016708,0.002106572,0.0010824703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057369046,0.000054698718,0.97501063,0.000020310938,0.000058265745,4.9275275e-7,0.009914438,0.0005395444,0.00024154356,0.000036958292,0.013486251,0.00006314479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8121648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77640563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035759144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000070347855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011254049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25103533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412027408","doi":"10.1007/s10531-025-03120-y","title":"AviList: a unified global bird checklist","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Checklist; Biodiversity; Geography; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science; Paleontology","score_opus":0.020889519325729775,"score_gpt":0.22502641188041117,"score_spread":0.2041368925546814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412027408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95579547,0.00002355126,0.00006542613,0.006641783,0.00007671316,0.000062901716,0.00008511902,0.000060633545,0.037188437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99545544,0.000045327295,0.00002465232,0.0035137378,0.0000028661698,0.0000015439299,0.000053414056,5.719018e-7,0.0009024447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966604,0.000012766464,0.00005073099,0.00012322307,0.00006918091,0.000078047415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998664,0.0000074008335,0.000020982252,0.000066342145,0.000008595154,0.000030267647],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005373649,0.000047324913,0.00004510542,0.000008503143,0.00019116885,0.000029815063,0.00006136952,0.00004226042,0.004239114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015577865,0.00004958984,0.000017283217,0.0002064954,0.00013426488,0.00009120012,0.00010666904,0.0000235128,0.0006176535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024799861,0.000023544142,0.89961714,0.0000053158087,0.0000040937402,0.0000011890512,0.000030958014,2.2123686e-7,0.00033020557,0.0062256656,0.09295489,0.0007819631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022781505,0.0000065365393,0.852684,0.0000021865537,0.00000976077,5.5768976e-7,0.00048448925,0.000027308539,0.000085693886,0.00015133829,0.14627352,0.000046749105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024650851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018438081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05331864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019688257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000061338774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99667114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414553738","doi":"10.1007/s10531-025-03138-2","title":"Not all protected areas are created equal: quality vs quantity in the quest to achieve 30 × 30","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Species richness; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Protected area; Global biodiversity; Climate change; Ecosystem services","score_opus":0.17618910759624726,"score_gpt":0.2540549926518895,"score_spread":0.07786588505564226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414553738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844394,0.000066917826,0.0008150092,0.012988256,0.000070466536,0.0004311974,0.00018712964,0.000020468144,0.0009811629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930806,0.00006521804,0.00008187568,0.0065172147,0.000008681913,0.000018109924,0.00007547731,0.0000018266612,0.00015100428],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992111,0.00007251994,0.00028638347,0.00027902017,0.000029674226,0.00012133112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995545,0.000065222775,0.00016752671,0.0001692034,0.000014666184,0.0000288722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000830461,0.00009201916,0.00018244503,0.000105409614,0.00016119228,0.00006166082,0.00013063049,0.00009191169,0.00016810006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000111418274,0.00009816055,0.000033105207,0.00015031328,0.000050675266,0.00017674801,0.00006746748,0.000093582006,0.0004066037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079473466,0.00006755194,0.97441024,0.00002149714,0.000018070132,6.528588e-7,0.00051281654,0.000017433433,0.000031724114,0.023386216,0.001322027,0.00013227818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005019426,0.00005064796,0.9898976,0.000012905835,0.0000074293325,1.8163314e-7,0.00043650594,0.00025974287,0.000035585013,0.0020453762,0.0066355513,0.00011651869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006690947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02134084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012468272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010755363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415461287","doi":"10.1007/s10531-025-03191-x","title":"Valuing species-at-risk recovery: A discrete choice experiment on public willingness-to-pay for conservation in Québec, Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Wildlife; Woodland; Population; Contingent valuation; Wildlife trade; Biodiversity; Status quo; Endangered species","score_opus":0.073247577350108,"score_gpt":0.203997077197591,"score_spread":0.130749499847483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415461287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97167486,0.0001639895,0.001384433,0.024948621,0.00026668052,0.0004054247,0.0003502782,0.000010894671,0.00079483894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99294955,0.0001373314,0.00019633608,0.00502497,0.000019766961,0.000037923764,0.00014603799,0.0000038097398,0.0014842727],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991713,0.000019503765,0.00029005102,0.00033112694,0.000032251945,0.00015575497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994735,0.00015313517,0.0001802655,0.00012943282,0.00001614762,0.00004748418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003303419,0.00010690238,0.00018254704,0.00012597327,0.00028797798,0.000048942966,0.00008254462,0.00006135021,0.000087024164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000170911,0.00012529104,0.00003592005,0.0001297621,0.000026932295,0.00021084974,0.000058372192,0.00005866137,0.00003339633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064750726,0.000022665079,0.9825877,0.000014819318,0.000022129487,1.8012247e-7,0.00014490278,0.00013329282,0.000028861476,0.0039260434,0.012659837,0.0003948431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007267955,0.000045035493,0.8317567,0.000014652881,0.0000066699617,7.92923e-8,0.000193155,0.001949413,0.00014408257,0.0004949267,0.16453427,0.00013422321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5385392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6437269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15187444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011605276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010275977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5109221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W628580956","doi":"10.1007/s10531-015-0944-2","title":"Application of a non-invasive indexing method for introduced Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) in the Aleutian Islands, Alaska","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Biology; Transect; Population; Zoology; Ecology; Invasive species; Introduced species; Demography","score_opus":0.03319609110534861,"score_gpt":0.262854968222668,"score_spread":0.22965887711731942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W628580956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915817,0.000009692618,0.005573509,0.002160638,0.000026433141,0.0003203044,0.0000164897,0.000003844751,0.00030739317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806064,0.000008174104,0.0012942697,0.0005639793,0.000009250964,0.000020244936,0.000015996216,7.857428e-7,0.000026631218],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956644,0.000049465572,0.00008586344,0.00014422649,0.00007415232,0.000079845195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971616,0.00010298279,0.00007314204,0.00006763861,0.00002185075,0.000018244775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000395444,0.000054285647,0.00008536373,0.000020084839,0.0001359757,0.000005820168,0.000085137704,0.000054846227,0.000009673994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004180303,0.00004295313,0.00001771389,0.000097451564,0.00011510655,0.000099754325,0.00005289907,0.00004436467,0.000019748873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008329922,0.00004104948,0.98870236,0.0000064552055,0.0000049233636,5.2254745e-7,0.003095837,0.000017641683,0.0043351804,0.000025750473,0.0024297652,0.0012572288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004715242,0.00010994686,0.99287987,0.0000023907683,0.000028692595,0.00000121691,0.0028603976,0.00053891167,0.0017416453,0.00010198625,0.0012046408,0.000058782858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081755413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031423562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064789723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035233395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013265412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17535084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7083701685","doi":"10.1007/s10531-025-03149-z","title":"Determining factors of endemic parrots’ large-scale occupancy: a study on climate and forest structure in the Amazon’s most at-risk region","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Universidade Estadual do Maranhão","keywords":"Occupancy; Deforestation (computer science); Threatened species; Endemism; Biodiversity; Habitat; Habitat destruction; Population","score_opus":0.01851838973988916,"score_gpt":0.22315925265366587,"score_spread":0.2046408629137767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7083701685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987586,0.000027165237,0.00002312652,0.0005629167,0.000063815074,0.00040266465,0.000017948221,0.000014436321,0.00012932338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879956,0.00007434317,0.0000061990727,0.0010608137,0.000014566157,0.000003719635,0.000026932034,0.0000014410374,0.000012449467],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939424,0.000028365012,0.00013164256,0.00019669058,0.00011961656,0.00012945384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996284,0.00006968406,0.00013966968,0.00012735405,0.000030232599,0.000004653355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022301816,0.000098847675,0.00011756351,0.00017376589,0.00036855874,0.00006523834,0.0001126843,0.000047542755,0.0000044866524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034463585,0.00007193073,0.000018893576,0.00028106343,0.00005173997,0.00024152962,0.00018230132,0.00007956132,0.0000016469663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007633832,0.000052657662,0.99674475,0.00006369892,0.000010708531,0.0000040394943,0.00138908,0.000009677344,0.000012261538,0.00028143427,0.0007930265,0.00056232675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007078379,0.000026629921,0.97490305,0.00003581694,0.000065124565,1.7080352e-7,0.0216246,0.0007934604,0.000009568709,0.00019986906,0.0015614714,0.00007240658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012059585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005014211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021841707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016350485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000060091875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.293325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W746209869","doi":"10.1007/s10531-015-0960-2","title":"Grazing increases functional richness but not functional divergence in Tibetan alpine meadow plant communities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Key Research and Development Program of China; Peking University; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Grazing; Biology; Species richness; Specific leaf area; Competition (biology); Agronomy; Species evenness; Plant community; Ecosystem; Ecology; Botany","score_opus":0.058062720859942595,"score_gpt":0.2017618041595863,"score_spread":0.1436990832996437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W746209869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99745744,0.00003593632,0.0004279886,0.0014146417,0.000130531,0.000067721034,0.00006644458,0.00002226842,0.0003769943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985341,0.000054980505,0.00013623832,0.00092155393,0.000009806721,0.0000049059436,0.00017996733,0.0000010487785,0.00015738612],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946576,0.00006942796,0.000098624645,0.00011529558,0.00015008834,0.000100821315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997182,0.00009812201,0.00005335955,0.000057221947,0.000027860198,0.00004522509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023301631,0.00007487927,0.00008393693,0.000045212048,0.00037462608,0.000013711825,0.00005989072,0.00005155239,0.00015808601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038075705,0.0000772359,0.000014697161,0.000113193564,0.00026121875,0.00027687426,0.00017914236,0.00007852271,0.00010826798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010534353,0.000049513408,0.99504983,0.0000042131296,0.000010515553,0.000002767153,0.00038150407,0.0005033928,0.00006751937,0.00041553684,0.0033458213,0.0000640357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004717751,0.00003023768,0.99249196,0.0000053531207,0.000013827721,0.0000054016855,0.0020186563,0.0038544396,0.000027192333,0.0003692394,0.0006174311,0.00009449104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006885242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01767059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010785348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084539766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001587195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W87356681","doi":"10.1023/a:1016660123189","title":"Species diversity of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in Iwokrama Forest, Guyana, and the Guianan subregion: implications for conservation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":171,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Species richness; Ecology; Geography; Taxonomy (biology); Species diversity; Biology","score_opus":0.05591637975261185,"score_gpt":0.20723554874702407,"score_spread":0.15131916899441222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W87356681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9191378,0.00016370474,0.0000126504265,0.08021936,0.000034962366,0.00025878978,0.000054518478,0.000010004027,0.000108267915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99796593,0.00056340144,0.000028095128,0.0012427251,0.000020899975,0.000008882131,0.0000672057,1.4652385e-7,0.000102706486],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995327,0.00005423386,0.00011804227,0.0001531791,0.000032951597,0.00010888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994244,0.0003489653,0.000092124355,0.00003520398,0.000079037694,0.000020254196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002464239,0.00006977546,0.00013918843,0.00001450396,0.0007371885,0.000011781947,0.00009112724,0.00009159464,0.000011618008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006301397,0.00003153836,0.000034580797,0.00013506347,0.0004960043,0.000105390325,0.00014653413,0.00004259988,0.0000010639425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023639716,0.000021247051,0.99020165,0.000005229262,0.00001671228,3.1251147e-7,0.00022225703,2.0983576e-7,0.00025528006,0.0056475503,0.0020334926,0.001359634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006712475,0.00007124556,0.9892597,0.000004853362,0.000027107399,0.0000032187324,0.0006356703,0.000036590707,0.00001871026,0.002650249,0.006559232,0.000062165775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002534086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02804134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07897663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000100442085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038373664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98969436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W97453941","doi":"10.1023/a:1016038501986","title":"Robustness of ecological niche modeling algorithms for mammals in Guyana","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Sampling (signal processing); Geography; Ecology; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.11675261212084043,"score_gpt":0.23903969542074804,"score_spread":0.12228708329990762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W97453941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960224,0.00002139811,0.0019621144,0.0013359599,0.00002729308,0.00010599241,0.000059094025,0.000007508059,0.00045822767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99929625,0.00008436292,0.00030659922,0.00021847562,0.0000036168947,0.00000365217,0.000028486924,6.067848e-7,0.000057964484],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968207,0.000011510351,0.00007497253,0.000097859964,0.000057945228,0.00007566496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998862,0.000018497598,0.00002869957,0.00003704227,0.000009093424,0.00002045528],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009105791,0.00003645672,0.000060245333,0.000013238367,0.000063797066,0.0000063724765,0.000045218287,0.00004785837,0.0041196872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020289443,0.000036122332,0.000017729442,0.00007791324,0.00005702453,0.00008140581,0.000044173157,0.000021052734,0.00002124585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078449506,0.00036267372,0.96572053,0.00004048817,0.000009381077,0.0000025538627,0.0004873352,0.005293942,0.0011231952,0.0005377659,0.020070788,0.006272865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008024167,0.000057606678,0.33105186,0.000004344486,0.000011542672,0.0000011113269,0.001220682,0.664271,0.00018078201,0.000044438522,0.002245926,0.00010830294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021884544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025623536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65897703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007063372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":9.035791e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}