{"meta":{"query_hash":"6ae519a4785d","filters":{"venue":"Biological Agriculture & Horticulture"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6ae519a4785d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Biological+Agriculture+%26+Horticulture"},"results":[{"id":"W1983135323","doi":"10.1080/01448765.2001.9754916","title":"Organic and Conventional Dairy Farm Comparisons in Ontario, Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Agriculture & Horticulture","topic":"Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Ministry of Rural Affairs; Dairy Farmers of Ontario","keywords":"Agricultural science; Organic farming; Livestock; Mixed farming; Agriculture; Manure; Herd; Dairy farming; Production (economics); Business; Agricultural economics; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Geography; Agronomy; Animal science; Economics; Biology; Forestry","score_opus":0.009797794872345276,"score_gpt":0.1860548784974515,"score_spread":0.17625708362510623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983135323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931912,0.00016863184,0.000020399932,0.0013447463,0.00008748476,0.00039562787,0.0000116036645,0.00004081617,0.004739526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99578303,0.000060026217,0.00017346836,0.0007429478,0.000054748674,0.000031087937,0.00014902047,0.000005280486,0.0030003667],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811906,0.00009134644,0.00034326233,0.0005807247,0.00032336888,0.000542245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994237,0.000040324354,0.00009089364,0.000143766,0.000011553929,0.00028980654],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011518714,0.00033722044,0.00032517227,0.0000100587085,0.00020773268,0.000040412262,0.00022805663,0.00029571174,0.005201451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047403926,0.00017243452,0.00007555031,0.00032070623,0.0002455099,0.00013471533,0.00025608976,0.0005495827,0.000050857445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036062767,0.00026689182,0.9603478,0.000003079505,0.000015980342,0.00009697551,0.00027207678,0.00017579828,0.009873151,0.00010064756,0.028583556,0.00022803369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030224107,0.00008617594,0.8098354,0.0000071552254,0.000012487404,0.00012970377,0.0012021622,0.0000043943896,0.000102871054,0.00009998599,0.18793209,0.0002853533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6997751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2933204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013647162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040325114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994041543","doi":"10.1080/01448765.2011.9756647","title":"‘Effective Micro-organisms’ (EM): An Effective Plant Strengthening Agent for Tomatoes in Protected Cultivation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Agriculture & Horticulture","topic":"Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Plant Biotechnology Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Bran; Sowing; Compost; Horticulture; Agronomy; Substrate (aquarium); Chemistry; Biology; Raw material","score_opus":0.021430115971088706,"score_gpt":0.20670909872662327,"score_spread":0.18527898275553456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994041543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991702,0.00017166385,0.000097632124,0.00018429711,0.0002393501,0.0064388947,0.00041207336,0.00045419237,0.0002998896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99254626,0.000041986572,0.002527205,0.00034578788,0.0005134635,0.002084511,0.0018043496,0.0000047799776,0.00013166391],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589455,0.00044701542,0.0007171425,0.0014529031,0.0004483889,0.0010400269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998503,0.00030287108,0.0004309646,0.00015690642,0.00031236396,0.00029385567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057437556,0.00076258485,0.00069905503,0.000046706282,0.0005715432,0.0001953377,0.0008333784,0.00074758916,0.0001042122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031308964,0.00023095294,0.0002954893,0.0012178409,0.00014499007,0.0005070221,0.00022443394,0.00053044426,0.00004013954],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048626884,0.0015593563,0.019988433,0.000044735632,0.000117182826,0.0000629287,0.0041476907,0.000033453045,0.9418151,0.0013556088,0.0027005945,0.027688663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000628179,0.0020757373,0.91376656,0.000110701185,0.00005927275,0.000051660736,0.0055295625,0.000050198116,0.06934556,0.0006261011,0.006833903,0.0009225417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002332229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020563537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89377815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002304094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007667856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94179875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049408829","doi":"10.1080/01448765.2008.9755052","title":"Component Interactions and Productivity of<i>Emblica officinalis</i>Based Cropping System in India","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Agriculture & Horticulture","topic":"Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Agronomy; Soil fertility; Radiata; Biology; Pennisetum; Pinus radiata; Vigna; Soil water; Botany; Ecology","score_opus":0.030353008121021888,"score_gpt":0.22130759291478427,"score_spread":0.19095458479376237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049408829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967204,0.00056777865,0.000011348785,0.00073298335,0.00019175389,0.0005269295,0.00005048031,0.00011085074,0.0010875071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912107,0.00004808254,0.000115623574,0.00011317501,0.00034239917,0.000051635503,0.000107017244,0.0000014102227,0.00009960985],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798185,0.0002720186,0.0005950797,0.0005889915,0.00019998127,0.0003620686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990184,0.0002164074,0.00037673066,0.000097150296,0.00014868828,0.000142653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026640715,0.0003055065,0.0005485143,0.000025649715,0.0002590857,0.00004187302,0.00025955893,0.00025306543,0.000044545184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011562245,0.00009591011,0.00016071336,0.00049403065,0.00017787534,0.00021495666,0.00011127226,0.00039127417,0.000010128823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014001846,0.0005438717,0.07339198,0.00006051824,0.000043923537,0.000039430914,0.00036602546,0.000032138258,0.9211184,0.0007533451,0.0018493319,0.0016610338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022602866,0.0003172012,0.9608068,0.00017453662,0.00001852122,0.00024043403,0.0015997721,0.000075738986,0.0055003148,0.000003937889,0.030727519,0.00030920832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070330384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026965153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91561806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097782955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011611218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39111006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078842492","doi":"10.1080/01448765.2007.9755043","title":"Aphid Infestation in Field Grown Lettuce and Biological Control with Entomopathogenic Fungi (<i>Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes</i>)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Agriculture & Horticulture","topic":"Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Biology; Macrosiphum euphorbiae; Aphid; Imidacloprid; Biological pest control; Horticulture; Population; Veterinary medicine; Aphididae; PEST analysis; Agronomy; Pesticide; Homoptera","score_opus":0.00658363483363963,"score_gpt":0.18842472788128964,"score_spread":0.18184109304765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078842492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99381524,0.0024201276,0.00020391704,0.0016207938,0.00014533832,0.0010921113,0.00009341107,0.00026385213,0.00034520685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952785,0.0004886573,0.00064888556,0.0025981378,0.0005682355,0.00008680125,0.00023410721,0.000004104835,0.00009258412],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963013,0.00029086642,0.0007789599,0.0011318665,0.0004008933,0.0010961093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812114,0.00081629516,0.00030724125,0.00014762548,0.0002218972,0.00038580925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086560776,0.0006637641,0.00074231374,0.000041468502,0.00027389667,0.00014514309,0.0004884382,0.00091885246,0.00017981943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003134061,0.00020403757,0.0001990672,0.00095471606,0.00020692848,0.00022186754,0.00014709437,0.00076887466,0.00003866525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035721247,0.00029270194,0.16028315,0.000008020334,0.000036928835,0.00021341263,0.00013339262,0.0000037605016,0.8201788,0.0005633399,0.00037036452,0.017558899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013809048,0.001954104,0.95882666,0.00006473872,0.00005517823,0.00053304166,0.0005220783,0.000005652505,0.023071788,0.000258377,0.012525212,0.0008022541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010135592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016350135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7985435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009339347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011504294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.832041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127438585","doi":"10.1080/01448765.2006.9755336","title":"An Evaluation of Companion Planting and Botanical Extracts as Alternative Pest Controls for the Colorado Potato Beetle","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Agriculture & Horticulture","topic":"Insect Pest Control Strategies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture","funders":"","keywords":"Colorado potato beetle; Sowing; PEST analysis; Biology; Pesticide; Pest control; Crop; Toxicology; Agronomy; Horticulture","score_opus":0.03109065715096814,"score_gpt":0.26486223207155907,"score_spread":0.23377157492059092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127438585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947939,0.0014465158,0.0000182937,0.0011679308,0.00012636924,0.0015824821,0.00016913505,0.0000764298,0.0006189499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980171,0.000057393536,0.000106297135,0.0001898921,0.0010060088,0.00020103753,0.00038815403,0.0000016382564,0.00003250478],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978181,0.00033098526,0.00047182027,0.00050378847,0.0004712108,0.00040410185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797094,0.00085607823,0.0003551339,0.00007974724,0.0006347229,0.00010337124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077015057,0.0003114254,0.00042205284,0.0000069657212,0.0004463902,0.00016819227,0.00034708637,0.00034953744,0.000061715335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028480837,0.00008106795,0.00016384972,0.00021368396,0.00020395253,0.00019167215,0.00004732926,0.00023438441,0.0000044915605],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019912278,0.0003240872,0.003938869,0.000005701928,0.000055633445,0.000003031076,0.000086541855,0.0003025369,0.97663116,0.012788688,0.0006394081,0.0050252113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010213319,0.0013796319,0.97297436,0.000031819112,0.00022126312,0.000061577935,0.0016595363,0.0014704058,0.010255876,0.004946109,0.00559475,0.0003833285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006360382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015982909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9690355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003830529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014165098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34333175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320060495","doi":"10.1080/01448765.2016.1163293","title":"Ion exchange membranes as an indicator of soil mineral nitrogen availability and nitrogen uptake by arugula (<i>Eruca sativa</i>L.) in soils amended with green manure","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Agriculture & Horticulture","topic":"Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Loam; Eruca; Agronomy; Soil water; Green manure; Manure; Plough; Avena; Chemistry; Chicken manure; Nitrogen; Fertilizer; Environmental science; Biology; Soil science","score_opus":0.012862711486400754,"score_gpt":0.20038432881149348,"score_spread":0.18752161732509273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320060495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99194366,0.003984643,5.4193544e-7,0.002091985,0.00005706995,0.0007551925,0.0008315092,0.00011609235,0.00021933416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956616,0.002260892,0.000081326805,0.00038665868,0.00037738172,0.00011190839,0.0006766776,0.000003529394,0.00044001624],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968041,0.00034039904,0.0006315549,0.0010454764,0.00045533938,0.0007230863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873173,0.00015339418,0.0003613452,0.00016018606,0.00014907547,0.00044427862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033684977,0.0005847409,0.000799058,0.000030247993,0.00017350083,0.000061000785,0.0004569482,0.00068890466,0.00029267694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008357809,0.0001473108,0.0001688211,0.0005322876,0.00034772418,0.00033114798,0.00012943338,0.00029022217,0.000021468692],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042348084,0.00059582555,0.0981819,0.000028470495,0.000059549915,0.000023559804,0.00029537422,2.291675e-7,0.88208044,0.0002189382,0.0021571675,0.015935052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023687633,0.0025835494,0.6554856,0.00018580731,0.00015349587,0.00018714737,0.0016615952,0.0000018074218,0.15894845,0.0039004486,0.17316209,0.0013613113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004497348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020044062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.723132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004218417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015552272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.600716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339061734","doi":"10.1080/01448765.2015.1133319","title":"The effect of green manure and organic amendments on potato yield, nitrogen uptake and soil mineral nitrogen","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Agriculture & Horticulture","topic":"Potato Plant Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Dalhousie University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; Department of Agriculture, Nova Scotia","keywords":"Compost; Agronomy; Solanum tuberosum; Crop rotation; Green manure; Manure; Fertilizer; Crop; Amendment; Soil fertility; Nutrient; Nitrogen; Crop residue; Chemistry; Soil conditioner; Crop yield; Biology; Soil water; Agriculture","score_opus":0.01386521518076319,"score_gpt":0.21430168647624764,"score_spread":0.20043647129548445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339061734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938721,0.0013348295,2.9323195e-7,0.0036585361,0.00005479701,0.0006343657,0.00016046914,0.00007173217,0.00021287441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99786836,0.0008194987,0.000010008019,0.00015971078,0.0002945376,0.00006787364,0.00006808992,0.0000022199306,0.000709682],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997585,0.0003031652,0.00037883015,0.00064054487,0.00042561727,0.0006668488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982665,0.0010297864,0.00017068129,0.00011628887,0.00010686104,0.0003098798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038224447,0.00043221583,0.0004608848,0.000011870197,0.00042504317,0.00009272605,0.00043847066,0.00041950945,0.00010992718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032726122,0.00008101116,0.00015583719,0.00029839022,0.00034242196,0.00009129515,0.0002592752,0.0003035599,0.00003363554],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021667247,0.00004963828,0.08539268,0.000010127487,0.000080624035,0.000015283746,0.000037741393,8.723012e-8,0.8924249,0.00016195944,0.0030867045,0.018523617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011508296,0.0065206992,0.7471519,0.00019121407,0.0001176436,0.00026482987,0.00042790466,0.0000023175226,0.21409911,0.0015937742,0.027677251,0.00080250227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011438563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006827156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6783258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034326567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000049811915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3389416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}