{"meta":{"query_hash":"8ab2cde52c76","filters":{"venue":"Biological Conservation"},"cohort_total":333,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":333,"exported":333,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8ab2cde52c76","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Biological+Conservation"},"results":[{"id":"W1183655724","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.07.036","title":"An ecological network is as good as a major protected area for conserving dragonflies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles; World Anti-Doping Agency; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Ecology; Biodiversity; Species richness; Dragonfly; Marsh; Habitat; Wetland; Threatened species; Biodiversity hotspot; Geography; Ecosystem; Species diversity; Biology; Odonata","score_opus":0.061224493798852316,"score_gpt":0.28694496000585445,"score_spread":0.22572046620700215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1183655724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8316213,0.0014516052,0.006011586,0.010843634,0.00032312807,0.000087902976,0.00061429705,0.00020917661,0.14883745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914676,0.0003274507,0.0032199472,0.00038718968,0.000046693924,0.000022522434,0.00015604861,0.000020455287,0.004352037],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993742,0.00020386743,0.00003363586,0.000100697594,0.00014196167,0.000145659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973495,0.0003390347,0.0006301163,0.0003067649,0.0004652576,0.00090929493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011783116,0.0003464922,0.00027330185,0.0010902487,0.0033125186,0.0026188304,0.00034167187,0.00091506355,0.010520183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002837075,0.00014579819,0.00016595364,0.001069461,0.0012150685,0.005374487,0.0013836464,0.0003995493,0.00057912496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010386835,0.0006693444,0.52085495,0.0008123109,0.000502009,0.00083842024,0.0034172833,0.0069443774,0.015914496,0.09843811,0.037569605,0.31300038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008279228,0.0015076459,0.7252163,0.00058176974,0.0004965225,0.0031555793,0.019241096,0.004585171,0.0045484584,0.06505412,0.17542231,0.000108198576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036766047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02547047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010520183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009037688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083961757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035193563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1246858610","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.030","title":"One step ahead of the plow: Using cropland conversion risk to guide Sprague's Pipit conservation in the northern Great Plains","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; U.S. Bureau of Land Management; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Geography; Population; Grassland; Arable land; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Conservation status; Habitat; Agroforestry; Biology; Demography; Agriculture","score_opus":0.0751460014911022,"score_gpt":0.254720581937088,"score_spread":0.17957458044598582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1246858610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91167945,0.0005733349,0.031362854,0.005261634,0.000034348795,0.00018172868,0.0010312996,0.00037848033,0.049496867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98063135,0.00020771052,0.01682088,0.000094465155,0.0000042814722,0.00002926517,0.00019428592,0.00001799618,0.0019996664],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987006,0.000047461963,0.0000038213993,0.000021082418,0.000026643887,0.00003091214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978036,0.000040547457,0.000040491504,0.000009746232,0.000051633386,0.000077231685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041114553,0.00028722215,0.0001247152,0.0006333077,0.0005747971,0.0015571335,0.0006088571,0.00026252752,0.002334676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009512115,0.00015717138,0.00017067429,0.0004989478,0.00062662107,0.0005233278,0.0007950762,0.00036119882,0.00015839694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008721659,0.00014735926,0.534875,0.00015130879,0.00011845777,0.00070949685,0.0034308094,0.28548327,0.0017236876,0.021271423,0.01751946,0.13448265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055157037,0.00016281958,0.39314392,0.00029833367,0.0001025616,0.00035835258,0.014185954,0.5216599,0.0011504986,0.024107426,0.044644643,0.00013036228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31675723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5861253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31675723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027124148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037155503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.629827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1809691465","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.09.016","title":"Conservation of northwest Atlantic harp seals: Past success, future uncertainty?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Subsistence agriculture; Population growth; Geography; Climate change; Fishery; HARP; Productivity; Population model; Population size; Ecology; Environmental science; Agriculture; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.06058935224988361,"score_gpt":0.261887241440243,"score_spread":0.2012978891903594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1809691465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36833516,0.36680305,0.011503509,0.15284958,0.0009809351,0.000050115694,0.0015629017,0.00006089446,0.09785387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77524745,0.21257444,0.0034610385,0.0023619032,0.0006108598,0.000026838883,0.00041500255,0.000015437636,0.005286962],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994972,0.00016412733,0.000032706474,0.0000923639,0.00014598205,0.000067729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818593,0.00061925413,0.0005648677,0.00007142371,0.00038610664,0.00017242794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002955815,0.00021718587,0.00031482853,0.00074880716,0.00086917105,0.0037543469,0.0005739125,0.00077215506,0.0022595893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039151506,0.00016338336,0.00017737233,0.001691762,0.0017206102,0.0035682959,0.00083795947,0.00080809015,0.00018788877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094498486,0.00008160523,0.28362095,0.0017208664,0.00020429783,0.00088683283,0.00708419,0.0067831622,0.0007611491,0.03675289,0.02500907,0.63700044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009743828,0.0003412521,0.55247223,0.0061404505,0.00018929174,0.0019972231,0.039746653,0.010764034,0.00063659024,0.0629379,0.3246231,0.00014152568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094575875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20463493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094575875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029728452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002460685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1880508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963905319","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.014","title":"Assessment of long-term tallgrass prairie restoration in Manitoba, Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Forb; Andropogon; Vegetation (pathology); Restoration ecology; Ecology; Habitat; Grassland; Introduced species; Biodiversity; Geography; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.036942293018735736,"score_gpt":0.27020327368123764,"score_spread":0.2332609806625019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963905319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99623626,0.00040581284,0.0002702235,0.00031690285,0.000008967372,0.00007051858,0.0004324793,0.000017368428,0.002241338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99619067,0.00026838286,0.0008704512,0.00010558537,0.0000027104247,0.00002766854,0.00032189302,0.0000054654633,0.0022071975],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993455,0.00008876468,0.00002235483,0.0000672034,0.00029748311,0.0001786906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737895,0.00011974801,0.00023530194,0.000058832047,0.0017443957,0.00046275806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011240521,0.00032116484,0.00039358874,0.0009011522,0.0031227162,0.0014460062,0.0016123358,0.0004127757,0.0006931125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021168464,0.0002425483,0.00023473667,0.0015125544,0.00090029696,0.00046965832,0.00089996157,0.0005184107,0.000102875456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046895468,0.00027657617,0.941884,0.00010585734,0.000240067,0.0003916048,0.0031041377,0.0041166544,0.005209194,0.00061169785,0.0025878893,0.041003436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011889448,0.000077226236,0.9918922,0.000027116303,0.00004511273,0.000039600887,0.0032534504,0.0022149333,0.000393432,0.000062824314,0.00197187,0.000010431697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99236405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03775971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03775971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04137023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27396715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965915251","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.019","title":"Does time or habitat make old-growth forests species rich? Bryophyte richness in boreal Picea mariana forests","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Lichen and fungal ecology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Bryophyte; Ecology; Habitat; Species richness; Taiga; Bog; Temperate rainforest; Old-growth forest; Geography; Biology; Ecosystem; Peat","score_opus":0.036796796586167684,"score_gpt":0.2199622777442623,"score_spread":0.1831654811580946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965915251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997136,0.00008399842,0.000014805195,0.000008811102,7.3954135e-7,4.8985885e-7,0.00002191491,0.0000012493689,0.00015448274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99982685,0.000036464437,0.000016500577,0.000004758665,0.0000016796097,6.007103e-7,0.000023691615,8.627769e-7,0.00008872845],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998543,0.000029423394,0.0000110143865,0.000045130608,0.000015727444,0.000044409193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945396,0.00009791314,0.00022584811,0.00004054574,0.00003612801,0.00014559076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030553152,0.00015558249,0.00025053145,0.00072733127,0.0004499086,0.00070435734,0.00030058224,0.00017273206,0.0011669452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007644202,0.00014307856,0.00015993342,0.00043240923,0.0005100984,0.0006091261,0.00064945366,0.00017215461,0.000096174655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021941162,0.000026450763,0.98524183,0.00003327451,0.0001201551,0.00013695197,0.001159559,0.00008373447,0.008137044,0.00009481918,0.000056633,0.00469021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.383741e-7,0.000009170143,0.9994235,0.0000018275109,0.000007140897,0.000025846504,0.0003711605,0.000023346385,0.000047553644,0.000016691833,0.00007196448,0.0000012133675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071587544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036553275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071587544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002802933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013374431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014234185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966433719","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2003.06.006","title":"Area-sensitive forest birds move extensively among forest patches","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Molson Foundation","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Fragmentation (computing); Ecology; Breed; Habitat fragmentation; Phascolarctos cinereus; Vegetation (pathology); Population; Forest fragmentation; Seasonal breeder; Zoology; Biology; Demography; Medicine","score_opus":0.041951843646504706,"score_gpt":0.2348806348107896,"score_spread":0.1929287911642849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966433719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99740595,0.00022203711,0.00050690956,0.000022913677,0.0000037036034,0.000004218859,0.000036960228,0.000013371218,0.0017839236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99786794,0.00011482616,0.00064372615,0.00005730343,0.000008731453,0.000005306384,0.000104126324,0.00001169121,0.0011863746],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998791,0.00002265828,0.000004514953,0.00004556081,0.000018947236,0.000029158693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919635,0.00022113131,0.00027409336,0.00010958419,0.000059815535,0.00013910327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017329429,0.00016381031,0.00034969204,0.0007040382,0.00053434615,0.0006112118,0.00021911487,0.00029985525,0.0036467179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066763506,0.00023625382,0.0001731539,0.00034584553,0.00037483187,0.00050679845,0.00056719786,0.00030084458,0.00048637082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000488936,0.00032807523,0.77858377,0.00014673565,0.0005231729,0.00027459892,0.0017972692,0.0015085905,0.14870283,0.0010001165,0.0019099184,0.06473599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000607348,0.00007589676,0.9962476,0.000007631477,0.000040349463,0.00016937772,0.00033729253,0.0004494061,0.0010459125,0.00024793128,0.0013678246,0.0000047588765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026402036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018732825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036467179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019991661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011299945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012199521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967199546","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2004.04.003","title":"Canada's boreal forest","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taiga; Boreal; Geography; Forestry; Ecology; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01816602981088519,"score_gpt":0.20461869155276408,"score_spread":0.18645266174187888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967199546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.177967,0.014070739,0.0014450261,0.03610039,0.0022280773,0.00037130492,0.09434036,0.0010616522,0.67241544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40203357,0.008489717,0.0040133363,0.0075727543,0.00019061237,0.0001366633,0.01948076,0.00024895652,0.5578336],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993488,0.000027534346,0.000013479362,0.00005724717,0.00027776236,0.0002751095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985196,0.00003484276,0.00004212088,0.00003286869,0.00080005097,0.0005705633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040680452,0.00043803224,0.00037322947,0.0015911395,0.0066881864,0.0030006478,0.000663257,0.0005207944,0.016252726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010406099,0.00025484164,0.00027643712,0.002318916,0.0006887104,0.0006221653,0.0009883902,0.0012535338,0.0012210249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001902646,0.000083426436,0.072643355,0.00031958852,0.00009194192,0.0005599589,0.0011179346,0.0008799688,0.0008505083,0.020947808,0.7727416,0.12957366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003212698,0.000020508192,0.18178359,0.00017186062,0.000032187945,0.0001927512,0.001632247,0.0004042108,0.0002405065,0.00082050817,0.81463444,0.00003499771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99686474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99949884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03331598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03331598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10106988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2417255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967352357","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.008","title":"Using forest structure and composition to predict the occurrence of vertebrate species in Douglas-Fir forests of British Columbia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Forest management; Range (aeronautics); Biodiversity; Ecology; Forest structure; Vertebrate; Forest dynamics; Temporal scales; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.029139751189134488,"score_gpt":0.24273195033591372,"score_spread":0.21359219914677924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967352357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994555,0.00007596649,0.000046764522,0.000019004414,0.0000017078772,0.0000028688487,0.00016322204,0.00000286086,0.00023218803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99928975,0.000054808585,0.00010436472,0.000010358312,9.5198675e-7,0.000002692984,0.00025899537,0.0000015112438,0.00027658526],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997652,0.00004743228,0.000020244623,0.000055802924,0.000046444908,0.00006480621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987962,0.00031447684,0.0001657273,0.00005412233,0.00038054568,0.00028889356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005983508,0.0002759045,0.0002522423,0.0011905414,0.0010100603,0.0008710029,0.0005818637,0.00034235057,0.00086760975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018806458,0.0002933734,0.00021215017,0.000988539,0.0004370448,0.00026036933,0.0003869173,0.0003937362,0.00019335913],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049744765,0.000025204927,0.99564207,0.000006313081,0.0000505599,0.00003618239,0.000098999124,0.0008156414,0.0004317686,0.000016632563,0.00015825327,0.0026686606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044196872,0.0000061956002,0.99698097,0.0000059123963,0.000017459193,0.000020717493,0.00025759608,0.0024823586,0.00006358978,0.000016858694,0.00014019916,0.0000037019372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91152227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97507733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08847773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004004262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028006753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17799753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967976700","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2012.09.019","title":"Avian mortality at communication towers in the United States and Canada: which species, how many, and where?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Warbler; Emberizidae; Bunting; Ecology; Geography; Population; Biology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.05509885846734688,"score_gpt":0.2459111992119399,"score_spread":0.19081234074459302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967976700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973194,0.0003246592,0.0000514674,0.0004079174,0.000019884863,0.0000054672946,0.000875819,0.000005235725,0.0009900895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982179,0.00019849637,0.00008020506,0.00010387932,0.000008646813,0.0000032267171,0.00054009986,0.000002820438,0.0008446779],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995079,0.00005626313,0.000024329047,0.00007085976,0.0001321811,0.00020851623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786085,0.00011879964,0.00051688385,0.000047096866,0.00088973384,0.00056665414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003600698,0.00024423047,0.00020967948,0.0007318841,0.0018079291,0.0009157927,0.0008409098,0.0006529627,0.001612404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017488169,0.0002386402,0.00029492704,0.0011748665,0.0007932716,0.00049553526,0.00065966806,0.00065412093,0.00022208746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054975655,0.000016253984,0.9928422,0.000014591667,0.000033830263,0.0000870616,0.0013058947,0.00016987331,0.00015462391,0.000057099332,0.0015250932,0.003738368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017601587,0.000008671775,0.99666804,0.000013852182,0.000008670996,0.000034138735,0.0027744027,0.00017615948,0.00002685413,0.000008558378,0.00027381236,0.0000050305775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9848395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015160501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009904491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07186246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968592013","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.012","title":"Relationships between grizzly bears and human disturbances in a rapidly changing multi-use forest landscape","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Foothills Medical Centre; University of Toronto; University of Calgary","funders":"Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Disturbance (geology); Ecology; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Population; Threatened species; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Forest dynamics; Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.06751044655028116,"score_gpt":0.24868323867417483,"score_spread":0.18117279212389367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968592013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99981135,0.00002365499,0.000019128865,0.000030805822,0.0000017901427,0.0000010671799,0.000024469948,5.9992016e-7,0.0000871222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99982774,0.000022854401,0.000027833825,0.00000959725,0.0000046122213,0.0000015179727,0.00004666288,8.20665e-7,0.000058239446],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967766,0.00009600235,0.000024292787,0.00006572684,0.00003705625,0.00009923208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826545,0.00040860038,0.00070515496,0.00010370095,0.00012376804,0.00039327217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058268395,0.00015119324,0.00023851283,0.0006781986,0.000887358,0.0008692113,0.00053843245,0.00063750375,0.0018209821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019601095,0.00022437486,0.00029807608,0.0007998503,0.0009971705,0.00086661574,0.0007703552,0.0007720617,0.00016625487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009883695,0.00007335453,0.99823654,0.0000026862308,0.000039367034,0.0001652534,0.00030253883,0.00012821668,0.00024275044,0.000036912283,0.00005388677,0.0006196607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002131078,0.00003177919,0.998524,0.0000011456104,0.0000074821323,0.00012051229,0.0009559582,0.00025070494,0.000017075397,0.000033057007,0.00005347741,0.0000027352626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028249975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1022532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028249975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000639252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003605445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05617112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971841692","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.015","title":"Agricultural insect pest compromises survival of two endemic Braya (Brassicaceae)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Diamondback moth; PEST analysis; Threatened species; Endangered species; Biodiversity; Ecology; Population; Brassicaceae; Ecosystem; Overwintering; Herbivore; Agronomy; Agroforestry; Habitat; Botany; Larva; Plutella","score_opus":0.12998656827210311,"score_gpt":0.2373345322680315,"score_spread":0.10734796399592839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971841692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995603,0.00005872553,0.000028880933,0.000015673371,9.96808e-7,0.0000019905126,0.000018061888,0.0000076268425,0.00030776992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992981,0.000055181892,0.00010349131,0.000025059497,6.9708426e-7,0.0000044906283,0.00006853358,0.0000039940287,0.00044043348],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983776,0.000041687304,0.000007614328,0.000038856913,0.00002666957,0.000047314956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996487,0.00008475836,0.00007724169,0.000031733558,0.00003639954,0.00012129362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020195008,0.00022135793,0.00025005252,0.0005155258,0.00063676626,0.0004036593,0.00046094015,0.000390427,0.0016667474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046532,0.00014018962,0.00010167103,0.0002654628,0.00034214565,0.00027299428,0.0004162754,0.00040013285,0.00020604453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018679254,0.0003292227,0.07115446,0.00014688239,0.00006144525,0.00065934303,0.0010546878,0.0002472758,0.9102238,0.0003521317,0.0003073379,0.013595444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008014753,0.0011240016,0.9518265,0.000023527697,0.00007983119,0.0013321792,0.0017615381,0.0015620091,0.03922822,0.00026238294,0.002699762,0.0000198617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064854515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019469587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064854515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008485128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025492426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012895405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972486549","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2004.10.007","title":"Conserving Africa’s rain forests: problems in protected areas and possible solutions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":324,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Sonaca (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Protected area; Outreach; Enforcement; Geography; Business; Population; Environmental resource management; Law enforcement; Government (linguistics); Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Agroforestry; Ecology; Economic growth; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.05638916506935705,"score_gpt":0.2109743928405588,"score_spread":0.15458522777120176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972486549","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15038255,0.26362717,0.017700616,0.5159777,0.0027052674,0.00012108193,0.00046985157,0.0000901856,0.04892557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8068125,0.153178,0.018441077,0.007514525,0.0033097735,0.0001477455,0.00028015443,0.000034844325,0.010281439],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991019,0.00035011698,0.00003275333,0.0000744128,0.00012493096,0.0003158986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978058,0.0009166378,0.0003540815,0.0001228447,0.00035059504,0.00045005942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028414233,0.00070669514,0.0005506628,0.0011009203,0.00447386,0.0052223178,0.0013689415,0.0025965788,0.0062322863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00486593,0.0002689222,0.00026532463,0.0032997378,0.0075631086,0.007461868,0.0033345688,0.0026680646,0.00029672135],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016629999,0.00022463583,0.026143575,0.0026979037,0.000090224334,0.0015679746,0.012732136,0.0068685845,0.003470092,0.38465333,0.060919747,0.50046545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007978752,0.00013145084,0.0389694,0.0031345272,0.00008428834,0.001728979,0.042495072,0.0053377976,0.0009991219,0.49099833,0.41595227,0.00008901731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019205691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04339381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019205691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002750425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005040416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0381878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975700461","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.019","title":"Environmentally biased fragmentation of oak savanna habitat on southeastern Vancouver Island, Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Threatened species; Ecology; Ecological succession; Habitat fragmentation; Fragmentation (computing); Agroforestry; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.02513288030186691,"score_gpt":0.2049469030721789,"score_spread":0.17981402277031197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975700461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987658,0.00010586235,0.000028035274,0.000051751176,0.0000024944327,0.0000048151337,0.00023473825,0.0000016795244,0.00080487074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99847585,0.00011130603,0.000083779596,0.000027869371,0.0000013224941,0.0000040019468,0.00018989074,0.000002617502,0.0011034057],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996649,0.00004265606,0.000012331591,0.000060437946,0.00009224602,0.00012745208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988732,0.000079841426,0.00016702086,0.000033667962,0.0005384755,0.0003077743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031107903,0.00016514071,0.0003141461,0.0010643769,0.0029555652,0.0011902086,0.0006584505,0.00027562078,0.0015044155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090384716,0.00023458766,0.00014895534,0.0016024122,0.0011743265,0.00023238685,0.0008379906,0.00033444085,0.00012884251],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001307871,0.000036671318,0.9855906,0.000027302562,0.0000703114,0.00015727145,0.0026960275,0.00028331144,0.0014995581,0.00017936794,0.0011125314,0.008216179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023128464,0.000004553807,0.99770457,0.000009515046,0.000007319098,0.000028247807,0.0017378846,0.00009979213,0.00003543461,0.000017025317,0.00035002298,0.0000033373158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.986979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013020992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01006632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009535072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07303655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977543966","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.020","title":"Looking beyond the mortality of bycatch: sublethal effects of incidental capture on marine animals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Bycatch; Reproduction; Biology; Population; Organism; Reproductive success; Fishing; Ecology; Marine ecosystem; Fishery; Ecosystem; Medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.026748286203165154,"score_gpt":0.2618757938951587,"score_spread":0.23512750769199353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977543966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924434,0.0019033705,0.0010558399,0.0010178816,0.00008197489,0.0000047982194,0.00021544639,0.000007078403,0.0032702142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973236,0.0006061057,0.00022269395,0.00030997413,0.00010344869,0.0000027149617,0.00008884372,0.000006238183,0.0013364009],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974936,0.00007365672,0.000011331899,0.00006885613,0.0000359192,0.000060885515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738103,0.0013030077,0.00050088,0.0003073893,0.0001725663,0.00033509653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007812678,0.00039305512,0.0004278814,0.00039247912,0.0003380355,0.0006854456,0.00047951107,0.00087158906,0.0040070247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024719657,0.00013710707,0.0006157327,0.00028797978,0.000673443,0.0014977262,0.00087131414,0.0011305872,0.00025898806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008100596,0.00022265383,0.91971034,0.00021743281,0.0012551056,0.0005286896,0.0005444168,0.002456991,0.014973177,0.0013591405,0.0013409676,0.05658103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022860743,0.00021675619,0.9963871,0.000028931874,0.00022323958,0.00010990946,0.00032203263,0.00067675975,0.00070802635,0.00077386515,0.0005425584,0.000008482682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042834077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012634254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042834077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017818889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023875285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013404787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978170386","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2004.04.021","title":"Declines in abundance and distribution of the ivory gull (Pagophila eburnea) in Arctic Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Nunavut Wildlife Management Board","keywords":"Seabird; Circumpolar star; Arctic; Geography; Population; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Population decline; Charadriiformes; Biology; Demography; Oceanography; Predation","score_opus":0.016973155637745416,"score_gpt":0.1923420747385106,"score_spread":0.17536891910076519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978170386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99820924,0.00029466045,0.000036139085,0.000080681624,0.0000051826887,0.0000025001784,0.0004269627,0.0000060713246,0.0009385313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820423,0.0002455742,0.00007158432,0.000052618063,0.0000020217071,0.0000026688342,0.00041675734,0.000003425577,0.0010011138],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997948,0.000013973739,0.0000063827256,0.000033097345,0.000052441497,0.00009929862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990608,0.000042231783,0.00017486633,0.000031434738,0.00045505745,0.00023567355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027604445,0.00020230374,0.00024567943,0.0010252519,0.0015531116,0.0007052278,0.0004786628,0.0003211474,0.000985357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077682873,0.00014267299,0.00014865934,0.0012213524,0.0009306295,0.00032755494,0.0004714347,0.00030961653,0.00017771548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003042856,0.000034000706,0.9836218,0.000036225054,0.00007402028,0.00013672028,0.001513779,0.00039875595,0.0052369568,0.00013396646,0.0013663587,0.007143079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014639337,0.000010495355,0.99844676,0.0000044430008,0.000006460965,0.000023631426,0.0007757873,0.00009168519,0.00009567096,0.000010551929,0.0005309288,0.0000021136004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97032803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99111044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029671967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00750793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004140477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059693396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979286076","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.008","title":"From hotspots to site protection: Identifying Marine Protected Areas for seabirds around the globe","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Killam Trusts; Northern Ireland Environment Agency","keywords":"Marine protected area; Marine conservation; Seabird; Context (archaeology); Marine spatial planning; Environmental resource management; Sustainability; Citizen science; Key (lock); Marine ecosystem; Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Environmental planning; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Predation","score_opus":0.10414570178690043,"score_gpt":0.28742640446229584,"score_spread":0.18328070267539542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979286076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91987985,0.0425732,0.004919952,0.0039539016,0.00017385771,0.00019883238,0.0050496836,0.00008273617,0.023167986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97343767,0.015072216,0.0069251107,0.00042336792,0.00015299037,0.000063265805,0.0021201216,0.000016562635,0.001788793],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997662,0.0000556427,0.000017903922,0.00005247807,0.0000498553,0.000058011137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891174,0.00031056636,0.00035486228,0.00005802599,0.00018577953,0.0001790003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007700484,0.00041068232,0.00025569956,0.005887261,0.00046439184,0.001708963,0.00048930227,0.00048448547,0.0035170738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017705071,0.00014554372,0.000344453,0.005867293,0.00046930314,0.0015232525,0.0013899448,0.00039245837,0.00021741235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013019475,0.000049730603,0.6815986,0.0014939072,0.00026684717,0.00029465376,0.0031583498,0.0008276483,0.0017172266,0.0019206557,0.007241673,0.30130047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069585317,0.00007844334,0.9780503,0.0003974811,0.00013602847,0.00036441936,0.009056378,0.00039203608,0.00028281528,0.0016112839,0.009609146,0.0000148589315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017597273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08769637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017597273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054845074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008272313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034989655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980665902","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.01.022","title":"Using functional traits to assess the role of hedgerow corridors as environmental filters for forest herbs","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Ecology; Seed dispersal; Habitat; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Phenology; Population","score_opus":0.1758475469761459,"score_gpt":0.23748039195782386,"score_spread":0.06163284498167795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980665902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999131,0.000028253577,0.0005520014,0.0000037532473,8.331562e-7,0.0000034458194,0.00006780176,0.0000041149246,0.00020879295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985468,0.0000144547785,0.0011669322,0.00001051056,0.0000011804292,0.000007135198,0.00011008982,0.0000033135266,0.00013956116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999579,0.0001712174,0.000020505593,0.00011702967,0.000058351863,0.000053825817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977648,0.0009870444,0.00066931295,0.0001535824,0.0001606901,0.00026462108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009786022,0.00052943657,0.00029315308,0.0012577927,0.00036708108,0.00072869216,0.0003193077,0.000570757,0.00073869986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017508335,0.00019370273,0.00025365409,0.0006942334,0.00045750645,0.0005982458,0.00037003632,0.00052651746,0.00010208527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004515841,0.00016958726,0.9417501,0.000037477876,0.0002949804,0.00004301312,0.00025478174,0.0008860203,0.047503844,0.00018042178,0.00005190174,0.008376389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008073535,0.00018136766,0.9945696,0.000004123107,0.000054259664,0.00005522646,0.0001269945,0.002566538,0.0022253548,0.00011110248,0.00008818904,0.0000091604925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00612019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01550509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00612019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031828557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024766815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012169182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982756397","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.047","title":"Hierarchical tree classifiers to find suitable sites for sandplain grasslands and heathlands on Martha’s Vineyard Island, Massachusetts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Grassland; Habitat; Vineyard; Geography; Ecology; Land use; Endangered species; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.025935885180560246,"score_gpt":0.24513092766137717,"score_spread":0.21919504248081692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982756397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99126667,0.0001774226,0.006319682,0.00011537712,0.00001387512,0.00003268351,0.000775722,0.00023811332,0.0010605948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870135,0.000034766515,0.010758138,0.000020882431,0.000012773966,0.000021870497,0.0013566964,0.0000152080775,0.00076608505],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983287,0.000033862358,0.000015044512,0.00005308932,0.000026320522,0.00003874279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908996,0.00048883294,0.00010405379,0.000039184735,0.00020939513,0.000068592606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042375384,0.00032178577,0.00036783633,0.002229098,0.0007189685,0.0006689679,0.0006993718,0.0004584962,0.0011916113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018064075,0.00017531191,0.0003262298,0.0008999852,0.00011358401,0.0004334984,0.00042355052,0.00025504702,0.00022746349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053646025,0.0003529583,0.6268275,0.00012352107,0.0003666708,0.00044421488,0.0009310323,0.07976999,0.00834155,0.0007449622,0.01375212,0.26780894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005581861,0.000066037515,0.1684247,0.000024369792,0.000102211096,0.000063397645,0.0010840464,0.8270522,0.0013765277,0.00069250166,0.0010450088,0.000013229008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16857214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36438692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16857214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093841995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009351296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33518183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983101969","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.11.006","title":"The quest for cryptic creatures: Impacts of species-focused recreational diving on corals","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Aquatic life and conservation","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"British Ecological Society","keywords":"Seahorse; Coral reef; Biology; Reef; Coral; Ecology; Fishery; Coral reef fish","score_opus":0.08940145674672119,"score_gpt":0.27725707491376184,"score_spread":0.18785561816704066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983101969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.985302,0.00036793537,0.000080743586,0.0029604628,0.000016385153,0.0000051454817,0.000054065622,0.0000047779376,0.01120847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980544,0.00035091792,0.0001363324,0.0003943201,0.000015603695,0.0000041760977,0.000024502446,0.0000022866632,0.0010175038],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997193,0.00008520728,0.0000069795997,0.0000317709,0.000052431387,0.00010418897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871266,0.00020710683,0.00030236866,0.000108722306,0.00016833234,0.000500808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058989495,0.00028582814,0.00017347399,0.00041543736,0.0014263516,0.001366615,0.00071201293,0.0012578969,0.013231473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019265274,0.00010157286,0.0003380044,0.0004002055,0.001879987,0.0008135317,0.0019156539,0.00078291225,0.00046247395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022542195,0.0018183735,0.6955936,0.0005332138,0.00043804914,0.0016453913,0.0047252225,0.0038762158,0.03097979,0.010939533,0.012124624,0.2350717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006944788,0.0011421617,0.9593787,0.00017528365,0.00013827413,0.0010312609,0.018378684,0.0011599534,0.0018026112,0.0046665324,0.012023954,0.000033163713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012499077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06565576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013231473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062215043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007420962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04426372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983836974","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.08.007","title":"Genetic and morphological divergence in island and mainland birds: Informing conservation priorities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Subspecies; Mainland; Genetic divergence; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Ecology; Passerine; Mainland China; Zoology; Genetic structure; Evolutionary biology; Genetic variation; Genetic diversity; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.04465415464976404,"score_gpt":0.23090585440772715,"score_spread":0.1862516997579631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983836974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99771583,0.0006334005,0.0002992809,0.00034589026,0.0000063065263,0.000003958272,0.000060720835,0.0000022623244,0.00093230023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998464,0.00037147186,0.00073908665,0.00008003456,0.000016932292,0.000003008929,0.00006354295,0.0000017529668,0.00026035993],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983585,0.00007368909,0.000009741178,0.000033104672,0.00002144524,0.000026159943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918765,0.00023562639,0.0002890098,0.000028484119,0.00010490125,0.00015437849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081768614,0.00018244349,0.000263866,0.0010012663,0.00043581417,0.0007874588,0.0003513887,0.0004334019,0.001124692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011905284,0.00013327124,0.00010609843,0.00089166395,0.0009557187,0.00083588995,0.00031657118,0.00047729188,0.0001252988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036848462,0.000099171615,0.94298077,0.0000897981,0.00009413425,0.0001441266,0.0010990527,0.00042060518,0.01033835,0.00060980674,0.00024595848,0.043509685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008250625,0.00008949791,0.9964259,0.000016641308,0.000024727797,0.00008809576,0.0015463403,0.0003933018,0.00023833016,0.00065571244,0.0005081773,0.000005020356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062386245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022365829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062386245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046794966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034266288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01240468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986086359","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2003.06.001","title":"Effects of marine reef National Parks on fishery CPUE in coastal Kenya","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Spillover effect; Fishery; Reef; Parrotfish; Fringing reef; Marine reserve; National park; Marine protected area; Coral reef; Geography; Seagrass; Coral reef fish; Ecology; Fishing; Oceanography; Biology; Ecosystem; Habitat; Geology","score_opus":0.02249853411309265,"score_gpt":0.2209551502241653,"score_spread":0.19845661611107263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986086359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999124,0.00008848252,0.0000032827434,0.00006384228,0.0000017530251,0.0000019407087,0.00006775092,2.4405946e-7,0.0006487391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994254,0.00010861578,0.000019490626,0.000018963903,0.0000013592413,0.0000042742313,0.000042767453,3.1468377e-7,0.00037883487],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970824,0.00008540296,0.000015021377,0.000024249735,0.000025369505,0.00014171853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979265,0.00051572523,0.0006461541,0.000044638622,0.00021545774,0.0006514978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042059348,0.00015341282,0.00013227083,0.00047061796,0.0011280768,0.0004561676,0.00030054987,0.00037390218,0.003873889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029154697,0.00013115868,0.00018612403,0.0005980882,0.0005705473,0.00047020032,0.00084112375,0.0004379389,0.00013943862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004860151,0.00013018862,0.993669,0.000038279468,0.000036738897,0.00028020324,0.0006472213,0.00014660759,0.00037690406,0.00022024995,0.00022578416,0.003742862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059252584,0.000082162565,0.9980118,0.000011716381,0.000013599602,0.00004988376,0.0015519774,0.000046581816,0.000046562232,0.000018827272,0.0001587625,0.0000021917897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5093901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021331445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015543774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.283023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986911666","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(03)00290-8","title":"Recovery of native plant communities after eradication of rabbits from the subantarctic Kerguelen Islands, and influence of climate change","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Polar Knowledge Canada","keywords":"Introduced species; Biota; Native plant; Ecology; Species richness; Invasive species; Herbivore; Archipelago; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Alien; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Population","score_opus":0.046773605763283946,"score_gpt":0.24015427823102653,"score_spread":0.1933806724677426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986911666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99978596,0.000037997852,0.0000052273485,0.000012405833,6.7732094e-7,0.0000012417036,0.000016104546,4.932476e-7,0.00013990559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999684,0.000037999736,0.000014714446,0.000010129538,0.0000014224056,0.0000026971313,0.000051519022,6.080105e-7,0.00019691278],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996692,0.000066020984,0.000019790303,0.000059824495,0.000041753912,0.00014351479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900913,0.00012875965,0.00043445072,0.000095984185,0.00013488851,0.00019672487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055876403,0.00017576267,0.0003022498,0.00075705664,0.0006836366,0.0007311636,0.0006060708,0.00049782096,0.0012541405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020842617,0.00015270615,0.00030412522,0.00053028634,0.0010953976,0.00050285173,0.00088270014,0.00040368448,0.00020126038],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017250907,0.00032941738,0.97502136,0.00005000022,0.00018887637,0.00085567054,0.0028447867,0.00025683708,0.0111169955,0.00010615101,0.00016860115,0.0073361853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003436104,0.00003615684,0.99933237,0.0000010434837,0.000005342904,0.000046489928,0.00041182613,0.000027682521,0.000076597644,0.000008039257,0.000049750714,0.0000011098921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033018656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07850815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033018656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012684024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057949434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06565291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987232806","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.10.032","title":"The trade in sharks and their products in the United Arab Emirates","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"United Arab Emirates University; Utah Agricultural Experiment Station","keywords":"Overexploitation; IUCN Red List; Geography; Fishery; DNA barcoding; Wildlife trade; Business; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.03796479434449743,"score_gpt":0.22921665587149093,"score_spread":0.1912518615269935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987232806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9772465,0.0031456256,0.000050800703,0.0023283646,0.00010244247,0.0000043545047,0.00025462246,0.0000037269147,0.01686345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98985064,0.0029112932,0.00019621162,0.0005094604,0.000073904055,0.0000032528485,0.00012869445,0.000002887812,0.006323707],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983215,0.000031825886,0.00001302034,0.000019162038,0.00005682134,0.00004695848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996408,0.000066344975,0.00014631776,0.000010408967,0.00008249312,0.000053590862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036823194,0.00016053418,0.00006937905,0.0008430094,0.00076272443,0.0006852004,0.00017437516,0.000572169,0.0049102097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060215173,0.000102958096,0.00012561031,0.0011558991,0.0007414458,0.00057405443,0.00044271533,0.0003683966,0.00031872556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049432844,0.00016720516,0.78126764,0.0003968008,0.000102163096,0.0038629672,0.008653688,0.000372319,0.00831601,0.0075967885,0.0090081785,0.17976204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009808813,0.00006113268,0.9626534,0.0001471372,0.000017393777,0.0011790355,0.0089611225,0.00018652319,0.00038072857,0.0002520378,0.026142923,0.0000085951515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040173046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09095369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040173046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009112578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010045815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07987845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988770041","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.03.009","title":"Evaluation of IUCN spatial distribution metrics for a migratory species, Fraser River Sockeye salmon","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Endangered species; Threatened species; Conservation status; Critically endangered; Geography; Ecology; Oncorhynchus; Fishery; Wildlife; Data deficient; Biology; Habitat; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.061523989611498235,"score_gpt":0.26181331646771977,"score_spread":0.20028932685622153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988770041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.984545,0.00018296514,0.0077704634,0.00015714507,0.000030747226,0.00013033599,0.0030117962,0.00027759728,0.003893882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747059,0.00008327611,0.019196011,0.000019406782,0.00000891466,0.00013171227,0.0050829723,0.00004619331,0.0007255863],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661225,0.0013305838,0.00030859897,0.00033440907,0.0012226943,0.00019133628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854563,0.0043229517,0.0018372078,0.00070452865,0.0070727095,0.0006062983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00683724,0.00066395075,0.00046259517,0.0029727109,0.0005184435,0.0011351429,0.00084309455,0.000388332,0.000997551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020154983,0.00018091955,0.00041848322,0.0032113546,0.00039971442,0.0012369292,0.00091179536,0.00024963656,0.00016757619],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006591037,0.00029835172,0.8216071,0.00015907214,0.0002649808,0.0000597293,0.00037585697,0.0523055,0.0014759767,0.002378242,0.0058000134,0.11461608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001308063,0.0017481261,0.594537,0.00009832479,0.0001755261,0.00025421262,0.0016706233,0.38975176,0.0040259855,0.0010733202,0.0064760353,0.000058261954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.081606366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12867913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9183936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026588875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025125518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16226274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989343681","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.014","title":"Impact of landscape composition and configuration on forest specialist and generalist bird species in the fragmented Lacandona rainforest, Mexico","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":249,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología","keywords":"Generalist and specialist species; Biodiversity; Deforestation (computer science); Rainforest; Geography; Secondary forest; Forest ecology; Ecology; Agroforestry; Old-growth forest; Intact forest landscape; Forest management; Forest restoration; Ecosystem; Habitat; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.049658566433444365,"score_gpt":0.2739731314441479,"score_spread":0.22431456501070357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989343681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99951243,0.000088084926,0.000012018346,0.000026345859,9.830679e-7,0.0000017497991,0.000053255233,0.0000011258617,0.00030398674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995448,0.000084022846,0.000043505257,0.000009455193,0.000003192213,0.0000036947565,0.0001151259,0.0000012240102,0.00019493743],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962485,0.0000999699,0.000019985002,0.00009382459,0.000043573185,0.00011774032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999206,0.00012909023,0.00033178114,0.000051969586,0.00011301556,0.00016817762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000394138,0.00019775609,0.00023241786,0.00094088016,0.00093606213,0.0008922652,0.00041763135,0.00027384097,0.0016736446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010722388,0.00015503573,0.00024247037,0.0009193386,0.0007654509,0.0003863408,0.00077478937,0.0002483733,0.000077934405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013679068,0.000062100284,0.99563026,0.000011089671,0.000065567074,0.00010706272,0.0002935286,0.00011446503,0.00047649594,0.000088098306,0.00010668723,0.0029078738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030094207,0.000011278835,0.9994369,0.0000030859037,0.000012943525,0.000023724626,0.00034238724,0.000056734345,0.000015291307,0.000010619005,0.0000831594,8.018752e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13311905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39703274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13311905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016399566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063220767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26468843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990646975","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.019","title":"Dynamics of harvested populations of the tropical understory herb Aechmea magdalenae in old-growth versus secondary forests","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Understory; Secondary forest; Old-growth forest; Population; Rainforest; Biology; Ecology; Geography; Agroforestry; Canopy; Demography","score_opus":0.04515023543095277,"score_gpt":0.2546630573733203,"score_spread":0.20951282194236753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990646975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998404,0.00001437301,0.000008707543,0.0000025456488,3.954695e-7,6.78484e-7,0.000034474688,3.6592044e-7,0.00009806623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952996,0.000021125816,0.000032449578,0.000007173775,0.0000011722844,0.0000023324958,0.00012568467,7.46589e-7,0.00027946927],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999367,0.000012038776,0.000004885239,0.000020862886,0.0000083839905,0.000017128543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931204,0.00015723331,0.00020962111,0.000035411504,0.000092072856,0.0001935789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025424195,0.000112271344,0.00016592784,0.0006405407,0.00040131918,0.00049166166,0.00036218239,0.00017485551,0.0011863591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007338193,0.0001376969,0.00009933121,0.00031367116,0.00045997318,0.0005854523,0.00041010333,0.0002703157,0.00014228607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039638867,0.000103788494,0.98057723,0.00001798685,0.00005461534,0.00012612647,0.001184421,0.00017208233,0.01357957,0.00015350504,0.00010294289,0.0035313738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023407308,0.000023194043,0.9993389,0.000001062514,0.00000400914,0.000027033955,0.00023886056,0.00013168018,0.00014945431,0.000016205799,0.0000658356,0.0000012899577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0134580415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06700456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0134580415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005794195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017703121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026759446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990989482","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.017","title":"Robust predictions of species distribution: Spatial habitat models for a brood parasite","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cowbird; Brood parasite; Context (archaeology); Habitat; Ecology; Population; Geography; Host (biology); Parasitism; Biology","score_opus":0.0689476746857939,"score_gpt":0.24341572770161335,"score_spread":0.17446805301581947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990989482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8048617,0.00038869394,0.19079925,0.0011378888,0.000048664486,0.000028954684,0.00041738132,0.0001795198,0.002138033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99112296,0.000088560446,0.0072853267,0.00007536412,0.000027021366,0.000022033553,0.00014376878,0.000029956544,0.0012049712],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970716,0.00014706336,0.000012730761,0.00006704691,0.000020163488,0.000045845365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964468,0.0026215832,0.00034622476,0.00020730292,0.00022751883,0.00015058053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024671284,0.0004338486,0.00074337196,0.00055304,0.00039128872,0.00089319923,0.0015825635,0.0010570629,0.002184522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008530156,0.00064443663,0.0006717661,0.0004370504,0.0008521391,0.0016150199,0.0007460684,0.0008502351,0.0002576097],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004553167,0.000015530495,0.003844788,0.000009456021,0.000032087664,0.000017837514,0.000020146275,0.9897922,0.00013004604,0.0036300614,0.00029208642,0.0021702026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063266602,0.000005229343,0.0006097523,0.0000013536455,0.0000051079614,0.000005793038,0.0000055546216,0.9967319,0.000020343925,0.0025786045,0.000027804752,0.0000022164318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017887205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014135691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017887205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009846161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052512944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03556615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991595463","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2012.02.016","title":"The role of seabirds in Marine Protected Area identification, delineation, and monitoring: Introduction and synthesis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Seabird; Marine protected area; Identification (biology); Geography; Foraging; Conservation status; Population; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.0310077914747789,"score_gpt":0.23561171947051848,"score_spread":0.2046039279957396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991595463","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018726558,0.9823973,0.0018859695,0.008866349,0.0023521003,0.000043423654,0.00066128565,0.000012876861,0.001908047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016001076,0.9656453,0.003933397,0.006465358,0.0063571865,0.00014393311,0.0003562875,0.00002251845,0.0010750561],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977476,0.00079477637,0.00036880924,0.0006657358,0.0003025141,0.00012057694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97477514,0.019858979,0.0017867279,0.0005304095,0.0027084225,0.00034027305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010711343,0.0012786429,0.0019132319,0.0051835375,0.0006442177,0.004030806,0.0015049651,0.0019823085,0.0071043014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015775947,0.0004994384,0.0011703272,0.008291242,0.0018087856,0.0047626705,0.002145301,0.0021495556,0.0008825828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046958463,0.00013361877,0.014775306,0.081346914,0.0010172161,0.00014109346,0.0012373324,0.002176105,0.0017220782,0.031580277,0.048005946,0.8173945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008506938,0.0006584805,0.081698254,0.07881147,0.0028990253,0.00044437477,0.0032952079,0.0010464551,0.0013625992,0.027259147,0.8022954,0.00014451783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014245811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029774396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014245811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023596426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029029232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05664766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992099232","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.01.023","title":"Patterns of species change in anthropogenically disturbed forests of Madagascar","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":234,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Generalist and specialist species; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Biodiversity; Endemism; Habitat; Grassland; Geography; Phylogenetic diversity; Vegetation (pathology); Taxonomic rank; Biology; Species diversity; Phylogenetic tree; Taxon","score_opus":0.044707310514981766,"score_gpt":0.2918771657305974,"score_spread":0.24716985521561563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992099232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996786,0.00006191211,0.000007970097,0.000020539228,7.9040876e-7,9.3665744e-7,0.000057666955,0.0000012876462,0.00017022756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998355,0.000028086128,0.000018896675,0.0000057873117,0.0000015012954,0.0000018860981,0.000046215275,4.885907e-7,0.00006163779],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989796,0.000021975733,0.0000071714358,0.000022787994,0.000012919323,0.000037222893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995047,0.00007264154,0.00028381436,0.000019771202,0.000043808104,0.00007524162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012581602,0.000113407375,0.00012288381,0.0010169515,0.00047999562,0.0004984456,0.00027430398,0.0001994473,0.0013825459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066697877,0.000091850394,0.0001225773,0.0010312761,0.000645652,0.00028685984,0.0004993013,0.00017501297,0.000069237016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014556323,0.000017983068,0.98863715,0.000034538443,0.00005348143,0.00018009474,0.0023957165,0.00014135124,0.0034200235,0.0001580211,0.00015664444,0.0046593803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.925663e-7,0.000005555607,0.9993474,0.000001813995,0.0000028373045,0.000032568085,0.00042039916,0.000060254006,0.000030405903,0.000006699424,0.0000903817,9.0509525e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03426842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10552398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03426842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006172615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022063077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068137884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993327743","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.004","title":"The role of social aggregations and protected areas in killer whale conservation: The mixed blessing of critical habitat","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Whale; Critical habitat; Endangered species; Habitat; Population; Fishery; Geography; Home range; Range (aeronautics); Context (archaeology); Ecology; Marine protected area; Marine reserve; Nature reserve; Population size; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.03273963387034539,"score_gpt":0.2621907492675565,"score_spread":0.22945111539721108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993327743","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16064526,0.660352,0.006670892,0.12240792,0.002063222,0.000057974295,0.00024839793,0.000036897687,0.047517434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7245483,0.24778235,0.0037798604,0.011620615,0.0063051917,0.000059432776,0.00007884241,0.000033067274,0.005792354],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991273,0.00043967486,0.000051529532,0.00012665636,0.00013973624,0.00011508363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882935,0.008815264,0.0008446354,0.00044728685,0.001020879,0.0005784605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058469055,0.0004310733,0.00054820406,0.0018256101,0.0013564018,0.0037468837,0.0010578285,0.0021669432,0.0048702955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069419774,0.0003795155,0.0004109733,0.0019173943,0.0072723655,0.009123387,0.002114523,0.0019644566,0.00021049475],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028089626,0.00015952231,0.07333109,0.002668994,0.0003627231,0.0006440157,0.0071341847,0.0024232366,0.002078258,0.18947405,0.023775471,0.6976676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006968134,0.00085361814,0.372069,0.0037777324,0.000565869,0.0019533793,0.03803368,0.006388517,0.0012382255,0.2307147,0.3440749,0.00026065283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018697793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053840015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018697793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013185147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001351068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03717792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993383230","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.02.010","title":"Maps, models, and marine vulnerability: Assessing the community distribution of seabirds at-sea","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Mount Allison University","funders":"Environmental Studies Research Funds; Mount Allison University","keywords":"Bathymetry; Environmental science; Seabird; Species distribution; Sampling (signal processing); Vulnerability (computing); Geography; Submarine pipeline; Aerial survey; Physical geography; Habitat; Fishery; Ecology; Oceanography; Cartography; Computer science; Biology; Predation","score_opus":0.07307902107966942,"score_gpt":0.2876948535988534,"score_spread":0.21461583251918398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993383230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.981309,0.00038306706,0.015243576,0.00031721382,0.000017168446,0.000018920193,0.0007181398,0.0001837168,0.0018092875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943441,0.00013447175,0.0048288605,0.000009714837,0.000008875794,0.000011769109,0.0003096381,0.000014080809,0.00033859207],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994159,0.00036362425,0.000019066254,0.000061412116,0.00009409473,0.000045923844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955871,0.0033390198,0.0004570502,0.00019672824,0.00026484395,0.00015512374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017653628,0.00066583685,0.00031752756,0.002810383,0.00031667866,0.0016595679,0.0006317388,0.0006789762,0.0016582365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009689337,0.0002776471,0.0005279809,0.0018796936,0.00055229646,0.0015478071,0.00093192264,0.00030785459,0.00016883972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028377713,0.00015715291,0.20109609,0.000082767656,0.00041110773,0.000099924095,0.00024737112,0.7552313,0.00033160654,0.0036805517,0.0012937918,0.037084606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028686167,0.00010132209,0.04574378,0.000029113298,0.00011152065,0.00010697644,0.00046730888,0.94118637,0.0002539008,0.011310747,0.00063748343,0.000022729013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026172629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029659707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026172629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082069536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005669416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052040577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994505276","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.020","title":"Natural regeneration of forest vegetation on legacy seismic lines in boreal habitats in Alberta’s oil sands region","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Alberta Innovates; Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures; University of Alberta; University of New Brunswick","keywords":"Regeneration (biology); Forest regeneration; Disturbance (geology); Taiga; Habitat; Logging; Terrain; Fragmentation (computing); Environmental science; Boreal; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Geography; Physical geography; Geology; Agroforestry; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.046907862987178424,"score_gpt":0.2622912435023202,"score_spread":0.21538338051514178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994505276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99909246,0.000033501386,0.000087905275,0.000017897504,6.427627e-7,0.000004294836,0.00019983074,0.0000077052155,0.0005558087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990841,0.000043910815,0.00024284468,0.000006426209,4.6760607e-7,0.0000030630622,0.00025529295,0.00000131168,0.00036254592],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986875,0.000015513724,0.000005945382,0.000030008901,0.00003656382,0.000043144297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979085,0.000034777895,0.0000436857,0.0000134039565,0.000063102445,0.000054163105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029541444,0.00017754475,0.00011335861,0.00073732313,0.00061302824,0.0006472767,0.0005241535,0.00017268234,0.00058041466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004599883,0.00012664088,0.0001718176,0.00078643515,0.00052127,0.00021235236,0.00035553638,0.00016140062,0.00007241962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016153956,0.00010823028,0.96277905,0.000029050634,0.00004263355,0.00036859387,0.00064320216,0.017171927,0.0016929305,0.00031549763,0.0005110984,0.016176287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007899349,0.000022074364,0.9851451,0.0000111206455,0.000009737117,0.000045626308,0.0010807335,0.013022361,0.00017273071,0.00006462457,0.00040909342,0.00000892255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9321525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9813421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06784749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064819404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003156616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13649404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995124281","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.064","title":"Estimating land and conservation management costs: The first step in designing a stewardship program for the Northern Territory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; Australian Research Council; Nature Conservancy","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Land management; Incentive; Conservation Reserve Program; Business; Environmental resource management; Land use; Opportunity cost; Environmental planning; Geography; Agriculture; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.14827319552701307,"score_gpt":0.25150926359071585,"score_spread":0.10323606806370278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995124281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9142817,0.0003135821,0.07157588,0.0019092106,0.000015722091,0.0008154239,0.00063986605,0.00011862007,0.010329997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92939585,0.00028428034,0.067451164,0.000067289795,0.000012909086,0.00018614672,0.00040025357,0.000029569092,0.0021725164],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831796,0.0010100765,0.00008831423,0.00010917901,0.0002656616,0.00020888024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960232,0.0026563513,0.00043568082,0.00022600248,0.00038987584,0.00026890158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030226547,0.00060152425,0.0011855582,0.0015399093,0.000986254,0.0022116136,0.00091522565,0.0010147024,0.0042685242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016135423,0.00050953106,0.000572063,0.0024389743,0.0005727226,0.0037328105,0.0009995307,0.0010456672,0.00018628882],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002758777,0.00085515354,0.27984315,0.00032049185,0.00039348696,0.0003584797,0.00111369,0.4773694,0.0025525582,0.0123344185,0.0029930442,0.22159025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006607618,0.0007189647,0.24080643,0.00011724246,0.00021336936,0.0001328426,0.004604633,0.7258864,0.0024812361,0.019444393,0.005439365,0.000089051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14473791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20577115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14473791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059340782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008122983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28779083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995851570","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.02.009","title":"Ecosystem services expand the biodiversity conservation toolbox – A response to Deliège and Neuteleers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; McGill University; Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Safeguarding; Ecosystem; Incentive; Land use; Agriculture; Environmental resource management; Geography; Natural resource economics; Agroforestry; Ecology; Environmental science; Habitat; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.017023046829292454,"score_gpt":0.19199075682185224,"score_spread":0.17496770999255978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995851570","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045672388,0.0031536494,0.00032182995,0.9894611,0.004861483,0.000004303448,0.000010057498,0.000020288202,0.0017104899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024707053,0.012156338,0.0032753134,0.92413336,0.021829272,0.000049615144,0.000034803703,0.0001401795,0.013674082],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887976,0.0033434879,0.0005131548,0.0017833661,0.004335198,0.0012272522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9219025,0.04729513,0.0021833729,0.0024296755,0.014103053,0.012086335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03362285,0.0011801589,0.0011327178,0.0017503427,0.0066818376,0.017284999,0.0030738893,0.033837643,0.017499987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043278527,0.00078159326,0.001156061,0.0017211043,0.0155927865,0.028159745,0.01347992,0.031647135,0.002618616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058850852,0.00007232044,0.0005890406,0.00018931601,0.00001682942,0.0002218819,0.0029356824,0.0003715002,0.00039486395,0.07269679,0.88932776,0.033125274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024620305,0.000027099184,0.0009051152,0.0004352171,0.000007739871,0.00014510979,0.0041057016,0.00038173012,0.00015190431,0.02883857,0.9649129,0.000064181244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008486993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02795931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033837643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005370747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014176385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17781675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996354819","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.03.008","title":"Food limitation at species range limits: Impacts of food availability on the density and colony expansion of prairie dog populations at their northern periphery","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Prairie dog; Range (aeronautics); Population density; Ecology; Biology; Population; Vegetation (pathology); Cynomys ludovicianus; Home range; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.08430423183855335,"score_gpt":0.2750657777001205,"score_spread":0.19076154586156713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996354819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996099,0.000038211685,0.00006192002,0.000008070584,3.7941155e-7,0.0000020774312,0.000018449771,0.0000014222175,0.00025971507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995053,0.000027898452,0.00022165645,0.000012466587,9.564787e-7,0.0000073925653,0.000052805208,0.0000012300584,0.00017033055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971586,0.000086774504,0.000012706758,0.000090911846,0.000048641512,0.00004504611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999345,0.00018193964,0.00022696325,0.000067143024,0.00006783355,0.00011118109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041574694,0.00012952568,0.0002370555,0.00031068572,0.0002642575,0.00042750713,0.00028827507,0.00016559876,0.0010168692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007082583,0.00014168021,0.0001520091,0.00015591751,0.00048514194,0.0004325989,0.0003951572,0.00024192678,0.00008245068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013405044,0.0005326908,0.71112067,0.0000863411,0.00011338861,0.0001944445,0.0008443513,0.00066624524,0.2669461,0.00023468513,0.00013844838,0.017782189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037696766,0.00028519152,0.9969494,0.000002881603,0.000009211584,0.00004487144,0.00018997943,0.0002656985,0.0020470899,0.0000308471,0.00016883058,0.0000021579121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006977517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006977517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005306701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024910684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013873816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998818448","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2004.05.015","title":"Threats, conservation strategies, and prognosis for suckers (Catostomidae) in North America: insights from regional case studies of a diverse family of non-game fishes","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":187,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Threatened species; Ecology; Outreach; Conservation status; Geography; Habitat destruction; Biology; Environmental resource management; Political science","score_opus":0.08100987379091829,"score_gpt":0.27365334190796625,"score_spread":0.19264346811704797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998818448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994691,0.000060833747,0.000028919887,0.00006279301,8.014821e-7,0.000004930713,0.000015799844,8.006578e-7,0.00035595486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996942,0.000094073635,0.00007842469,0.000009710212,7.5797465e-7,0.0000048856477,0.00001562513,5.3940556e-7,0.00010191206],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996257,0.0001845926,0.000024566969,0.00003982163,0.00004623828,0.00007911611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987961,0.00045336384,0.00034523968,0.00006734611,0.00017379933,0.00016403724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091223116,0.00024579235,0.00014074131,0.00074610184,0.0013250855,0.0005471835,0.00056741276,0.00074334256,0.0006974815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004048331,0.00016726744,0.00024709996,0.00056384644,0.0012664902,0.00054119545,0.0006628203,0.00040854502,0.00005969367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001133958,0.00015072741,0.97683597,0.000033185566,0.000042334377,0.005585309,0.0071956227,0.0007640891,0.00066402217,0.00042024945,0.00032842733,0.007866636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009259278,0.0002437866,0.96500665,0.000025880272,0.000050883365,0.004490428,0.027747165,0.001247334,0.00025272887,0.00031693044,0.0005924238,0.000016400125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048217468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1961618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048217468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013646426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058163604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095873654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001076865","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.09.020","title":"Extent and conservation of tropical dry forests in the Americas","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":559,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research; University of Alberta; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf forests; Tropical forest; Agroforestry; Geography; Dry forest; Tropics; Forestry; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.0349270508460397,"score_gpt":0.2716435825648472,"score_spread":0.23671653171880752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001076865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946096,0.0011766651,0.000054692486,0.00022122423,0.0000047875387,0.000004755766,0.00019086205,0.0000021599344,0.0037352692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993057,0.00030064012,0.000056640187,0.000021140244,0.0000059907857,0.0000017460537,0.0000689604,5.8464894e-7,0.00023857033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983764,0.00004126505,0.0000105308845,0.000023525217,0.00004143229,0.000045554447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907196,0.0001637502,0.00044844818,0.000054507993,0.00011881527,0.00014249499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041147353,0.00010552352,0.0001272347,0.001308159,0.0005172547,0.00065443426,0.00023007527,0.00011522801,0.0011094486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001313528,0.00008897006,0.0000782977,0.0013028869,0.0009856255,0.0004230784,0.000661623,0.00020314475,0.000031077485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012864794,0.00004352732,0.9768539,0.00008609218,0.000067935594,0.000099687124,0.0014525618,0.000991579,0.0011694808,0.0020897898,0.00049483037,0.016521936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002870539,0.000006389021,0.99780947,0.000013542828,0.0000074314453,0.000038647537,0.0006623907,0.00010600495,0.000032513344,0.00020111121,0.0011183261,0.000001243008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057472702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19560726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057472702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009855002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006728163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11427635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001274460","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.006","title":"Recent declines in northern tall-grass prairies and effects of patch structure on community persistence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Geography; Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Range (aeronautics); Quadrat; Introduced species; Biology; Shrub","score_opus":0.039429911075955185,"score_gpt":0.29316087798226137,"score_spread":0.2537309669063062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001274460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996599,0.000108703956,0.000032005388,0.000022588378,9.189276e-7,0.0000010941203,0.000039007336,0.0000014959943,0.00013426617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959594,0.00007273788,0.00006034278,0.000014460627,0.0000033215033,0.0000021963554,0.00008099792,8.110852e-7,0.00016922582],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982077,0.00003564015,0.00001231067,0.00006303823,0.000024734789,0.000043467993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888355,0.00017985371,0.00040253773,0.00008680932,0.00019021572,0.00025700423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006453438,0.0001497837,0.0002721253,0.0005683887,0.00052457635,0.0004660284,0.00047046127,0.0005054761,0.0016028708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013210078,0.0001970914,0.0001935746,0.0005174288,0.0007958304,0.0007167069,0.00042189815,0.00038572203,0.0001591782],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034533718,0.00010160149,0.9817718,0.000042070234,0.00010647999,0.00008680447,0.00095765205,0.00020604767,0.0095249815,0.00007590082,0.00011848357,0.006662849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011125976,0.000021438938,0.99966407,0.0000010601647,0.0000040415403,0.000017750976,0.00015205074,0.000058990125,0.000027419406,0.000009099852,0.00004237278,6.0916153e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021569794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08321714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021569794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005628845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029755733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042888463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001467053","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.008","title":"Integrated and novel survey methods for rhinoceros populations confirm the extinction of Rhinoceros sondaicus annamiticus from Vietnam","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Barrie Urology Group; Queen's University","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund","keywords":"Rhinoceros; Endangered species; Threatened species; Subspecies; Critically endangered; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Near-threatened species; Population; Geography; Captive breeding; Biology; Zoology; Ecology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.14984027833243513,"score_gpt":0.3424957095226395,"score_spread":0.1926554311902044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001467053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921582,0.00025727993,0.004166433,0.0000455561,0.000020668616,0.00006289134,0.00055313116,0.000026827418,0.0027091221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98765534,0.00015467562,0.009901218,0.000041532272,0.000010858753,0.0000797096,0.00066248333,0.0000099369845,0.0014843706],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922585,0.00017218718,0.00005888043,0.00030214284,0.00013564594,0.00010535071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875987,0.00017044651,0.00035354946,0.00014683125,0.0004276839,0.00014170485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009967007,0.0003835857,0.00030204357,0.0009833103,0.00047914806,0.00047473234,0.00057432696,0.000301929,0.0010552779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011042051,0.0002517147,0.0002441888,0.00071595155,0.00054955855,0.0006014363,0.0005939688,0.00036182298,0.00030235763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010320524,0.00007588629,0.92476785,0.00008443038,0.0001008169,0.00017183372,0.0022203664,0.00044065257,0.023453567,0.00012876958,0.00033421107,0.048118375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009742242,0.00013903383,0.99215966,0.000036141493,0.00008325169,0.0003628625,0.0021299631,0.0014285557,0.0020281624,0.00007546397,0.0015338878,0.000013204377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032147534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.108269386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032147534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059855694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006613359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063920796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001758322","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.02.012","title":"Thresholds in nesting habitat requirements of an old forest specialist, the Brown Creeper (Certhia americana), as conservation targets","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Snag; Nest (protein structural motif); Habitat; Ecology; Forest management; Forestry; Wildlife conservation; Nest box; Forage; Biology; Geography; Predation","score_opus":0.06541535065942038,"score_gpt":0.2640918516222248,"score_spread":0.19867650096280443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001758322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996978,0.000023516297,0.000044665987,0.000010223332,5.3790285e-7,0.000001174927,0.000010618849,0.0000011360459,0.0002102415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997851,0.0000067593337,0.000077927434,0.000007162828,3.6766528e-7,0.0000020698408,0.000017640152,0.0000012084597,0.000101783],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986863,0.000046582532,0.000007471009,0.00002963124,0.000021857792,0.000025819478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987104,0.0004381503,0.00039973197,0.000040632007,0.00012836907,0.00028265567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041574496,0.00011662238,0.00016361347,0.00026088223,0.00021125215,0.00045301748,0.00018291203,0.00027198627,0.0005495968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017222442,0.00010764807,0.00007166899,0.00013579475,0.00027645082,0.00029492844,0.00024216101,0.00035975894,0.000048462516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016294334,0.00029992466,0.9170439,0.000049881823,0.000057494388,0.00015839808,0.001065614,0.0020777215,0.06686207,0.0006557061,0.00046028403,0.0096395705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005786271,0.00013407304,0.9966714,0.0000023500295,0.000010823071,0.00008701083,0.00032912378,0.0015842034,0.00091003824,0.0001421953,0.0001193798,0.0000036769288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066075292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020791637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066075292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004456855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019841146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013138115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006809702","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.028","title":"Cost-effective abundance estimation of rare animals: Testing performance of small-boat surveys for killer whales in British Columbia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Humane Society International","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); IUCN Red List; Abundance estimation; Population; Fishery; Ecology; Endangered species; Geography; Rare species; Distance sampling; Transect; Population size; Estimation; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Biology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.0913858292275923,"score_gpt":0.28085991837884117,"score_spread":0.18947408915124886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006809702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986192,0.000119627715,0.0005918326,0.00008215278,0.0000032502062,0.000018564466,0.00012582669,0.000018716973,0.0004209563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99649185,0.00011512923,0.002687955,0.000032618518,0.0000029854962,0.000013723685,0.00021366047,0.0000043977207,0.00043779323],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883133,0.0005194383,0.00008258755,0.0001771054,0.00028435196,0.000105206724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897904,0.0069164257,0.0006986658,0.00043049813,0.0018174818,0.00034668855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028382768,0.00044666693,0.00031121727,0.0005194794,0.0005595781,0.00059793744,0.00080119324,0.0006125707,0.00063864613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014034638,0.00026011476,0.00022408922,0.0007237018,0.0004118707,0.0007620331,0.0004519913,0.00031036927,0.00015860159],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012280109,0.00033501885,0.90991884,0.00012749669,0.00016558409,0.00013481382,0.0006996747,0.014700155,0.0041947546,0.000114595285,0.0007308791,0.06765032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007681109,0.00078532234,0.93385774,0.000026429814,0.00018794696,0.00015180703,0.0012010275,0.060985155,0.0020384295,0.00012271674,0.0005341044,0.000032353713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5988889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.808301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40111113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026284144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020824664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8069467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006950852","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.03.022","title":"Alternative growth histories in populations of Lake Superior brook trout: Critical support for partial migration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Queen's University; University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Great Lakes Fishery Commission","keywords":"Salvelinus; Trout; Fontinalis; Fish migration; Juvenile; Tributary; Habitat; Ecology; Population; STREAMS; Geography; Fishery; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Demography","score_opus":0.1041936038897397,"score_gpt":0.28296593012107174,"score_spread":0.17877232623133205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006950852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999605,0.000024912713,0.00005566287,0.0000414988,0.0000016044846,0.0000011162622,0.000030116713,7.941752e-7,0.00023936295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99974173,0.000010263512,0.00009339077,0.00001739122,0.0000026607931,0.000002665868,0.000044290297,0.0000013721534,0.000086335545],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993765,0.00027424478,0.000049269405,0.00014317574,0.00007032671,0.00008655746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99265176,0.0031961468,0.0014790389,0.0010321825,0.0006268399,0.0010141194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026586258,0.00019828476,0.00029785253,0.0004622344,0.0009970588,0.0009675559,0.0008205942,0.00048253458,0.0035818885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009182897,0.00023201025,0.00028681115,0.0004414822,0.001952309,0.0008152665,0.001122878,0.00071233226,0.0001075102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011623099,0.00005650278,0.9847056,0.000029177345,0.00018362889,0.00017200285,0.0015313393,0.001061256,0.0027094707,0.00096640206,0.00013233308,0.0072899596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001756512,0.00011205514,0.9955924,0.000006517908,0.000044260356,0.00022219698,0.0013331425,0.0018027493,0.00011322021,0.00058474735,0.00016058523,0.000010446575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069845077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03345658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069845077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045603001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007158144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0140603185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007098848","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.039","title":"Assessing the utility of stakeholder analysis to Protected Areas management: The case of Corbett National Park, India","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"The Corbett Foundation","keywords":"Stakeholder; Stakeholder analysis; National park; Business; Environmental resource management; Stakeholder theory; Stakeholder management; Stakeholder engagement; Politics; Public relations; Political science; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.08740437431936181,"score_gpt":0.28049910856330174,"score_spread":0.19309473424393991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007098848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9837339,0.00009441889,0.00084351416,0.0008780931,0.0000063437224,0.00007126622,0.00006212028,0.000007188002,0.014303048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99888855,0.000048126698,0.0006036979,0.000030847354,0.0000029042858,0.000015111293,0.000011741904,0.0000020631446,0.00039711746],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542505,0.0031162493,0.000089619636,0.00014312085,0.0004334874,0.0007924908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98134893,0.015281467,0.0009286156,0.000475331,0.0012767047,0.0006889059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045752604,0.0003523123,0.00024495716,0.0024261835,0.0032248988,0.0033973614,0.0015217997,0.0012655841,0.002817421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0151753025,0.00022114888,0.00063192006,0.0027961351,0.003005713,0.0017891276,0.002731941,0.0012816454,0.00012658787],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022690517,0.0012042891,0.6102241,0.00077448844,0.0005113255,0.014958744,0.043382887,0.10507125,0.003144791,0.0911883,0.0053469627,0.12192394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023516965,0.0012936866,0.52966547,0.0003373977,0.0005564225,0.002366315,0.22502896,0.19766791,0.0027925223,0.026758501,0.013090402,0.00020709964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17005995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31123883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17005995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008770226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00465528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3381402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007554848","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.10.002","title":"A global assessment of seamount ecosystems knowledge using an ecosystem evaluation framework","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Seventh Framework Programme; Ministry of Education and Science","keywords":"Seamount; Pelagic zone; Oceanography; Benthic zone; Geology; Geography","score_opus":0.10352292077138012,"score_gpt":0.34897183311392865,"score_spread":0.24544891234254854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007554848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73764414,0.004228696,0.17529564,0.00674827,0.00005078671,0.0004741842,0.002132835,0.0002358908,0.073189504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9407631,0.00060864276,0.056966875,0.00010317864,0.00001564173,0.00011957249,0.0005029847,0.00002003076,0.0008999516],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934168,0.0035752563,0.0004436667,0.00043195568,0.0016997283,0.0004326467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895734,0.005269119,0.0011323857,0.00093939947,0.0025632929,0.00052236265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021274457,0.0008242991,0.0010245953,0.009345567,0.0016550315,0.006165172,0.00096678565,0.0010875382,0.0022264738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021786267,0.0003014935,0.0008873816,0.00515111,0.0022111486,0.007320384,0.0055563236,0.00068041583,0.00007891136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071386603,0.0003948796,0.107358105,0.0008960224,0.0012333065,0.0005465108,0.00277874,0.20533253,0.0027151885,0.26065847,0.00452504,0.41284743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015538458,0.00093467947,0.12693308,0.0018101403,0.0013979505,0.0005961881,0.012199944,0.39107323,0.0048679025,0.42902225,0.030794257,0.00021490647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02351612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038417485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02351612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005884471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0087849945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112511456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008130610","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.025","title":"Recolonizing sea otters spatially segregate from pinnipeds on the Canadian Pacific coastline: The implications of segregation for species conservation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre; Ministry of Forests; Government of British Columbia; Alberta Innovates; University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures","keywords":"Foraging; Otter; Habitat; Ecology; Interspecific competition; Predation; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.08323088878042742,"score_gpt":0.24622435517005042,"score_spread":0.162993466389623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008130610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947502,0.0007934587,0.00026967304,0.00015246615,0.000011215875,0.000020565842,0.00048020302,0.000007775747,0.0035142826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99716634,0.00047987216,0.00030319253,0.00007817007,0.000005205916,0.000009366914,0.0006240487,0.000008343191,0.0013255818],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938977,0.00003797008,0.000014642637,0.0001723993,0.00013917318,0.00024600167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991615,0.00004132577,0.000225578,0.000043869342,0.0004117704,0.000116027935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003343592,0.00031850504,0.00033992197,0.0019573858,0.0017997074,0.0009968599,0.0008626381,0.0003048649,0.0018444589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088840997,0.00021986176,0.0003190253,0.0028514494,0.0011892318,0.00051657576,0.0009369249,0.0004590654,0.00019849814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015707331,0.000032332315,0.96623737,0.00006308675,0.00014728523,0.00011134577,0.0047758915,0.00020765874,0.0069720414,0.0003673128,0.00084776856,0.020080823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.3250213e-7,0.000005977609,0.9972275,0.000010342694,0.0000142825165,0.00002195633,0.002006286,0.00004025736,0.000071651826,0.00003235529,0.00056443777,0.0000039990177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9128562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9790323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08714378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004668343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052006524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17531395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009977435","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.006","title":"Threats to Canadian species at risk: An analysis of finalized recovery strategies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Leverhulme Trust; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Endangered species; Habitat; Wildlife; Critical habitat; Recreation; Critically endangered; Business; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geography; Environmental planning; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.04445685709558191,"score_gpt":0.24500777012898534,"score_spread":0.20055091303340342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009977435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9192183,0.0015529642,0.0012648896,0.0028111446,0.00003668496,0.00072395045,0.0012416258,0.000045243407,0.073105074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879731,0.0010814236,0.0024228375,0.00037256273,0.000008697001,0.00010921761,0.00057131465,0.000013021837,0.0074477247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954922,0.00040614483,0.000097748576,0.00022717193,0.0018626826,0.0019140005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99287295,0.00067196606,0.00085190363,0.00019144347,0.0042377682,0.0011739488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003594984,0.0006599837,0.00035903635,0.0044238204,0.0058860723,0.002649282,0.0028138154,0.0010866714,0.004213789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010846335,0.00025346648,0.0011177901,0.0035216557,0.001795879,0.001122585,0.0019445589,0.0011665529,0.00017771158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012902454,0.0006698869,0.5966915,0.00055137195,0.0008572634,0.0011807862,0.00832548,0.038058963,0.0026436136,0.049880296,0.017113252,0.28273728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044084536,0.00043191315,0.94674516,0.000193698,0.0004954471,0.00025481186,0.0147319455,0.013243814,0.0007283302,0.0036146936,0.019410783,0.00010527734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9561004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055017754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055017754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07127412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39918363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016242205","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.032","title":"Integrating connectivity and climate change into marine conservation planning","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":210,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Climate change; Environmental resource management; Marine spatial planning; Geography; Marine protected area; Environmental planning; Ecology; Computer science; Environmental science; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.05792149686592645,"score_gpt":0.25843280401696517,"score_spread":0.2005113071510387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016242205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.581434,0.016287563,0.064471684,0.068255566,0.00070680305,0.00018412809,0.0009924643,0.0001296608,0.26753804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891685,0.0029594926,0.00585688,0.00040725325,0.00009413333,0.000037200836,0.00006653393,0.000013399761,0.0013965889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952316,0.00031226024,0.000012496962,0.000042109325,0.000049760543,0.000060167727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708825,0.0018255558,0.00036783583,0.00015854753,0.00026871258,0.00029109226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001380431,0.00023885624,0.0002041864,0.0015617976,0.0009802646,0.002251769,0.00064215314,0.0007280619,0.0056551285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071061784,0.00020275329,0.0002505226,0.002879866,0.0021961555,0.0038181231,0.0017081308,0.0010697366,0.00008552354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113379974,0.0002389374,0.2284368,0.00046923562,0.00042073498,0.00037089142,0.0030057395,0.107686386,0.00060792145,0.38637128,0.010352204,0.2619265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003379712,0.00024836246,0.25125092,0.0007874927,0.00047348553,0.00022885654,0.017948885,0.07118538,0.0007227015,0.5845649,0.07247665,0.00007859753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041660175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14409815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041660175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026500116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033455691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082835376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016275358","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.017","title":"Climate oscillations and conservation measures regulate white-faced capuchin population growth and demography in a regenerating tropical dry forest in Costa Rica","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Northwestern University","keywords":"Tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf forests; Population growth; Geography; Population; Biome; Ecology; Climate change; Tropics; Tropical climate; Dry season; Ecosystem; Forestry; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.03542323076751347,"score_gpt":0.23309395634805397,"score_spread":0.1976707255805405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016275358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998016,0.000018362987,0.000012713873,0.000010886341,3.1748553e-7,0.0000012479687,0.000028231503,8.079275e-7,0.0001257078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99982494,0.000018164801,0.00002501119,0.000008567264,7.285126e-7,0.0000019179092,0.000036064645,7.99788e-7,0.000083882],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99990845,0.000033185028,0.0000059720714,0.000017861768,0.000006344318,0.000028239047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996797,0.00005811681,0.00012154402,0.000029086115,0.00004490628,0.00006665452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027766117,0.0001150653,0.00016410329,0.00042791403,0.00035091766,0.00038128317,0.00030555218,0.00018327148,0.0005024227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006602734,0.00010099559,0.00015066822,0.0003535825,0.000505954,0.00019287062,0.00046260757,0.00013136056,0.00007074227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011319377,0.000038520622,0.9924217,0.000011366428,0.000041282197,0.00009212265,0.0010601712,0.0004418494,0.0032750661,0.00006510607,0.00009520533,0.0023443964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020237378,0.000008550176,0.9989066,0.0000017458492,0.0000067973583,0.000014889348,0.0005865722,0.00035143757,0.000046016852,0.000008799917,0.00006525069,0.0000012133055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07620149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20595536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07620149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080436066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033758962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1515159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017094970","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2007.03.019","title":"Weighing the costs and benefits of reduced sampling resolution in biomonitoring studies: Perspectives from the temperate rocky intertidal","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine Biology and Ecology Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Biomonitoring; Intertidal zone; Sampling (signal processing); Taxon; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Temperate climate; Sampling design; Biology; Geography; Computer science; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.14639088290218996,"score_gpt":0.3352779778749815,"score_spread":0.18888709497279152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017094970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41985622,0.07197336,0.0684559,0.4065869,0.0017757951,0.00025552983,0.0012241972,0.00016398128,0.029708134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87462366,0.02246284,0.07679206,0.020313732,0.0025915238,0.00028229045,0.00021833529,0.00012797354,0.002587459],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97342086,0.020380583,0.00097028475,0.0010847002,0.0034516717,0.0006919297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77658075,0.19168355,0.0071769617,0.006736521,0.015464906,0.0023573502],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07142384,0.0009597382,0.0016949308,0.0011850784,0.001581509,0.0051420135,0.0028726633,0.0045934776,0.0026675786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15126824,0.00067289005,0.0010395156,0.0024160163,0.005324015,0.006202673,0.0032158024,0.0031229004,0.00034175202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057345177,0.0004229344,0.19691567,0.004548873,0.0032508182,0.0013759618,0.004313523,0.040567573,0.014100731,0.06630929,0.015520397,0.64693975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070021,0.0039248695,0.5301747,0.0037393232,0.0041709514,0.0043827095,0.017340282,0.0425658,0.013206892,0.29660094,0.08238282,0.00081060565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02354615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062056698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9285762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027022015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048394054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3777299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018654129","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.001","title":"Tracking seabirds to identify ecologically important and high risk marine areas in the western North Atlantic","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Manitoba","funders":"Office of Polar Programs; Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Trophic level; Apex predator; Habitat; Geography; Population; Fishery; Pelagic zone; Biodiversity; Foraging; Ecology; Oceanography; Biology; Geology","score_opus":0.039915721282472075,"score_gpt":0.27549379081428366,"score_spread":0.2355780695318116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018654129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999411,0.00002504202,0.000080203725,0.00003241117,0.0000029350258,0.0000043998402,0.00006026721,0.0000026930309,0.00038096152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989812,0.000045246274,0.00038223853,0.000024759878,0.0000021436279,0.0000058443206,0.00010192856,8.834079e-7,0.0004557154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999907,0.000020526257,0.0000060228354,0.000022962658,0.00002014572,0.00002326666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996152,0.00005393578,0.00012450937,0.000019238292,0.00009722978,0.0000898027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031826526,0.00012156775,0.0000982091,0.00041514877,0.00030622206,0.00028370426,0.00025412443,0.00022393203,0.0005361749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006366719,0.00011418617,0.000079503,0.00025802635,0.0001537712,0.0002240749,0.00022118176,0.00013016854,0.00011140678],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035101508,0.000038182276,0.99266523,0.0000065845493,0.000021882075,0.00003365871,0.00032062634,0.00022700019,0.001295513,0.000015802158,0.0002353308,0.0051050917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032162754,0.000025691083,0.99825245,0.0000043649293,0.0000094831385,0.000017469194,0.0005527046,0.00078206835,0.00009827599,0.000010704245,0.00024203237,0.0000014005542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21400973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63296187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21400973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048597137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042670753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4255281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020241281","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.025","title":"Flock size and human disturbance affect vigilance of endangered red-crowned cranes (Grus japonensis)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Key Technologies Research and Development Program; Nanjing University","keywords":"Vigilance (psychology); Flock; Foraging; Predation; Ecology; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.03441351234788326,"score_gpt":0.24844100691794938,"score_spread":0.21402749457006612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020241281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998995,0.000010099616,0.0000034751818,0.0000034187863,5.4206043e-7,5.376497e-7,0.000009199304,4.0477755e-7,0.00007277434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997073,0.000011965538,0.000017792929,0.000010862822,0.0000011152613,0.0000018882174,0.000039549646,8.8143014e-7,0.00020865354],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992275,0.000015222291,0.000005329186,0.000024331091,0.000009167228,0.000023141598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939954,0.00010826652,0.0002363685,0.000032809425,0.000035193236,0.00018787301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016400083,0.00023424077,0.00015314682,0.00043985844,0.00028820802,0.0002912634,0.00020362763,0.0003080284,0.0014401048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071473303,0.00020830809,0.00014164293,0.00016079693,0.00040449656,0.00023077281,0.0002772181,0.00030008118,0.00018406306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078241684,0.0004005808,0.9825165,0.000015494248,0.00008153453,0.0003279727,0.00077548967,0.00014696678,0.012099094,0.000031875068,0.00012730819,0.002694751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015812487,0.00006250016,0.99963427,8.0599625e-7,0.0000066963707,0.000040790706,0.00011616823,0.00005733221,0.0000576274,0.0000042960055,0.000016723843,0.0000011872611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01229243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04799215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01229243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026883555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012803615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024441779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024032905","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.040","title":"Revisiting Western Hudson Bay: Using aerial surveys to update polar bear abundance in a sentinel population","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Nunavut","funders":"","keywords":"Transect; Aerial survey; Abundance (ecology); Bay; Distance sampling; Population; Geography; Shore; Mark and recapture; Physical geography; Sampling (signal processing); Abundance estimation; Habitat; Ecology; Environmental science; Fishery; Oceanography; Cartography; Demography; Geology; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.062916920950096,"score_gpt":0.2849683692265922,"score_spread":0.2220514482764962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024032905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871853,0.002787115,0.0027423403,0.0013419911,0.0002920153,0.00015557879,0.0018837318,0.00008141726,0.003530561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97228795,0.004542629,0.015255255,0.0010395874,0.00024484398,0.00019587665,0.0027947943,0.00003358144,0.0036056258],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994547,0.00016239898,0.00008204167,0.00008836337,0.00015313434,0.00005933805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683326,0.00057587994,0.0006784537,0.00026737558,0.0014587636,0.00018624518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040723593,0.00033290312,0.00022018042,0.0013700208,0.0003559649,0.0007779959,0.00057206163,0.00027136435,0.0005803904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005138933,0.00024294986,0.00016460022,0.0012757946,0.00031567249,0.00083285966,0.00067407486,0.00035108582,0.00016552646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052379084,0.0000387892,0.914401,0.00011912917,0.00006423387,0.000110092966,0.0012956691,0.00026903197,0.0021262097,0.000049674065,0.0041200933,0.07735378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076117676,0.000073383286,0.98876846,0.00008959942,0.00004750292,0.000079573205,0.002606965,0.0006062502,0.00054932147,0.0000425268,0.0071225646,0.000006219047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2299527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51828855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7700473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008393119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019142029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45722842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025384719","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00248-3","title":"Outcomes of longterm deciduous forest restoration in southwestern Ontario, Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Understory; Ruderal species; Vegetation (pathology); Deciduous; Geography; Trampling; Plant community; Introduced species; Native plant; Plant cover; Restoration ecology; Forest restoration; Ecology; Invasive species; Forestry; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Habitat; Canopy; Species richness; Biology; Forest ecology; Ecosystem; Grazing","score_opus":0.022978815216640112,"score_gpt":0.21316306262289708,"score_spread":0.19018424740625697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025384719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99618274,0.00037450535,0.000027773167,0.0003958939,0.000016712718,0.000024384022,0.00053797016,0.000004729723,0.0024352188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99627125,0.00018446702,0.0000425523,0.00006638875,0.0000046994023,0.000011531652,0.0004598746,0.0000019300219,0.0029572695],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992706,0.00005595209,0.000029395535,0.000057571066,0.00014462273,0.0004418366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714595,0.000077600416,0.000495871,0.00010198874,0.0010279468,0.001150528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047695075,0.00018111632,0.00039922813,0.00044631475,0.003482178,0.00096407766,0.00094533165,0.00049567793,0.0018689459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002252713,0.00012080228,0.00032229544,0.00081784435,0.0008954539,0.0004134016,0.0010607066,0.0006325666,0.00019406692],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024654132,0.0005818666,0.94123083,0.0000738231,0.00015480223,0.000649876,0.0046570376,0.0012266244,0.0009285185,0.00043119997,0.005947873,0.041652106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026953148,0.00014664163,0.9927931,0.000030434512,0.00004256244,0.00007170097,0.004263331,0.00025735522,0.00014477999,0.000084442254,0.002127766,0.000010840372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97421753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99663466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025782466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02312011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028450409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16774893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026689849","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2004.06.003","title":"Arctic sea ice trends and narwhal vulnerability","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bayer Canada","keywords":"Oceanography; Bay; Arctic; Sea ice; Arctic ice pack; Climate change; Open water; Population; Habitat; Geography; Environmental science; Physical geography; Fishery; Geology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.057490272060290414,"score_gpt":0.2712938116510199,"score_spread":0.21380353959072948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026689849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9224531,0.03033553,0.0004908021,0.0023997175,0.00016952984,0.000011499304,0.0028442382,0.00001785363,0.041277613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634137,0.026496068,0.00042384496,0.0002890035,0.00020091674,0.000013019907,0.0011482295,0.000008299755,0.008006998],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991405,0.000021896987,0.000009123088,0.000019218805,0.000018482757,0.00001711581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961627,0.00012324625,0.00010662983,0.000016663078,0.00008195913,0.000055210676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041332084,0.00012263506,0.00010936906,0.0012142279,0.00029276763,0.00075696426,0.00014586898,0.00023956508,0.0034232035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008759004,0.00007438005,0.00019926575,0.0016936267,0.00019131418,0.00071567565,0.00039814322,0.00023223135,0.00018109422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009659904,0.000014461162,0.94357115,0.00020328836,0.00018824011,0.0001286474,0.0011867277,0.00023738162,0.00038739198,0.0013083705,0.0020751308,0.050602723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020119564,0.000038952556,0.9855671,0.00010735143,0.0001033551,0.00012913278,0.0023870256,0.000095707794,0.00011476559,0.0004424568,0.011007951,0.000004101515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051354315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1512153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051354315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033393074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039924908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1021108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026692173","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.02.031","title":"Re-defining recovery: A generalized framework for assessing species recovery","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University; European Commission","keywords":"Process (computing); Baseline (sea); Population; Legislation; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Process management; Business; Medicine; Political science; Environmental health","score_opus":0.11109821143716876,"score_gpt":0.30250881805885993,"score_spread":0.19141060662169118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026692173","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07467953,0.0009892386,0.90982074,0.0018070154,0.000100801735,0.00029740683,0.0006332151,0.00043014952,0.011241896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.764479,0.00041913262,0.23113665,0.00035154406,0.00009553688,0.00043866405,0.0005124811,0.00016828939,0.002398745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910307,0.0042113094,0.0007482785,0.0017051875,0.001459343,0.0008451569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98616636,0.0060225124,0.0023814114,0.0029296135,0.0018057717,0.00069442816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018149083,0.0017720155,0.0020631903,0.0077266274,0.0017581995,0.0055691903,0.0043866117,0.0026566037,0.004182832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034618307,0.00042775134,0.0026673565,0.005500952,0.008030806,0.009447899,0.0073108505,0.003701215,0.0003621132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001920098,0.00021573917,0.042735226,0.00047789616,0.0007577423,0.00043889615,0.0027878392,0.2385906,0.0026720548,0.5721505,0.003899616,0.13508186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021760781,0.00026490146,0.015222242,0.00020781846,0.00022521487,0.0005580906,0.001814793,0.32408723,0.0010486572,0.64816815,0.008248387,0.00013280014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012125354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01154185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018149083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033268488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026201284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09598267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027136921","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.011","title":"Effects of agricultural landscape and pesticides on parasitism in native bullfrogs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Parasite Biology and Host Interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal; Concordia University","funders":"Environment Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Wetland; Biodiversity; Biology; Habitat; Abundance (ecology)","score_opus":0.015366520867306133,"score_gpt":0.2880200507113412,"score_spread":0.27265352984403507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027136921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99983,0.000041708572,0.0000033070444,0.000007794941,4.092167e-7,6.016129e-7,0.000010432215,5.8145343e-7,0.00010524294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996014,0.000037226906,0.000024185552,0.00001474627,0.0000010015391,0.0000015647946,0.000025018599,8.4727594e-7,0.00029406627],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998872,0.00003327997,0.000006362785,0.000025336012,0.000020854157,0.000026915443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994253,0.00012848205,0.00019149794,0.000021600197,0.00005025914,0.00018294936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020804629,0.00014365082,0.00024532175,0.000443266,0.00032721474,0.00034952938,0.00015892509,0.00028359337,0.0011285804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072021247,0.0001335832,0.00014036991,0.00015587886,0.0003416927,0.00025761485,0.0002627301,0.00025293467,0.00007319821],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056549427,0.0017369043,0.81793725,0.0001236144,0.00040879622,0.0007886376,0.0009747299,0.0011832053,0.15745224,0.00027929462,0.00047978802,0.012980648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009683854,0.00038052467,0.9985677,0.000001998584,0.000022508011,0.000057298956,0.00015678255,0.00024440477,0.0004623042,0.000022739061,0.00007104836,0.0000029482642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026736705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09810711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026736705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080189446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026108525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053162158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031784400","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.016","title":"Development and validation of an expert-based habitat suitability model to support boreal caribou conservation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Rimouski","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Boreal; Critical habitat; Habitat; Threatened species; Taiga; Geography; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Wildlife; Habitat conservation; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Endangered species; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.05620424206138886,"score_gpt":0.2690925328595823,"score_spread":0.21288829079819344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031784400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8395302,0.000057477846,0.15306096,0.00023158007,0.000031344334,0.00018474163,0.00092244404,0.0007876234,0.005193637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9550577,0.000020549687,0.043497488,0.00003560905,0.0000034902978,0.00009247382,0.0007514495,0.000028048635,0.00051317073],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995758,0.00018080359,0.00003784241,0.00006611972,0.00010044979,0.00003897353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983511,0.000935473,0.00008217051,0.00013914157,0.0004243831,0.00006775168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017139626,0.00037667376,0.00036199274,0.00063412817,0.00031853022,0.00069298636,0.00086732535,0.0006286519,0.0013802102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043899952,0.0002041537,0.0003771107,0.0003238632,0.00018127769,0.00065838895,0.0005026526,0.00042306044,0.00019300677],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015514885,0.0005154958,0.033744328,0.000041628286,0.00012017431,0.00013681539,0.00015800638,0.91541946,0.0028417627,0.0013592512,0.0014644536,0.044043493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010929057,0.00003632379,0.0027383969,0.0000051655397,0.000010342045,0.000015455345,0.00003626927,0.99597037,0.0005026733,0.000331311,0.00033759995,0.0000052147843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03188572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03566834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03188572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069848064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013809621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06340021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032165093","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.027","title":"Shifting targets in the tundra: Protection of migratory caribou calving grounds must account for spatial changes over time","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère des Ressources Naturelles et de la Faune; Hydro-Québec; ArcticNet","keywords":"Ice calving; Tundra; Habitat; Wildlife; Geography; Peninsula; Ecology; Herd; Critical habitat; Fishery; Arctic; Biology; Endangered species","score_opus":0.12997323396805072,"score_gpt":0.3645656814857069,"score_spread":0.23459244751765618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032165093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99232215,0.00027959407,0.0037427703,0.0016411418,0.000036294736,0.000011972968,0.00006199507,0.00000997152,0.0018941028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785006,0.000100736936,0.0013717224,0.000073103605,0.000010934416,0.0000075938224,0.000028415892,0.000007258124,0.0005501663],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994392,0.00022703617,0.000024317189,0.000116523755,0.00006775763,0.00012514177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985846,0.00043944715,0.00037405317,0.00012784703,0.0002577886,0.00021621342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017916892,0.00023471292,0.0003342359,0.0005206009,0.00083873514,0.0019595874,0.001096483,0.0011044198,0.0018837918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008368724,0.0002920197,0.00029036618,0.0007935544,0.00058083277,0.0016770333,0.00095982413,0.00074653607,0.00019463472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019778001,0.00023906268,0.8565392,0.00010139411,0.0003881418,0.00046390382,0.0034556184,0.06418562,0.002008496,0.005798477,0.0014627622,0.06515948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020812355,0.00016406647,0.8321999,0.00013591281,0.00024923348,0.00034949812,0.01225667,0.1384136,0.0005453477,0.011791835,0.003833769,0.00003936518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19561015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38428852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19561015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015823978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028350074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3889432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035566651","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.04.021","title":"The giant squid Architeuthis: An emblematic invertebrate that can represent concern for the conservation of marine biodiversity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Cephalopods and Marine Biology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Marine protected area; Invertebrate; Marine ecosystem; Ecology; Marine reserve; Ecosystem; Marine conservation; Geography; Fishing; Fishery; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.19226835349334825,"score_gpt":0.25623844565345094,"score_spread":0.06397009216010269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035566651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937622,0.00106258,0.00043853233,0.00049608527,0.000051059345,0.000015752265,0.00014017284,0.000034231434,0.0039993688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99325776,0.0011482823,0.0012374134,0.00040962014,0.000050338484,0.000013175872,0.00017924389,0.000007738608,0.0036965196],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99993193,0.000009193789,0.000005212579,0.000015075303,0.000015700609,0.000022860511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981076,0.00001168221,0.000044423145,0.000008871488,0.000019998784,0.00010426271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015000837,0.00056301436,0.00022574866,0.0005610331,0.001373223,0.0005131779,0.00028377297,0.0008077002,0.0020262983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028849862,0.00012259238,0.0001340524,0.0003450589,0.00090090325,0.0006006778,0.0011694896,0.0003342668,0.0006197344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020503546,0.00017473886,0.6253211,0.0006121957,0.00011609033,0.017926501,0.0035572085,0.0004244112,0.24654984,0.003704862,0.004930076,0.09463268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059650123,0.0026184854,0.8792906,0.00023798349,0.00016865968,0.04747641,0.009161185,0.0011876796,0.012953817,0.002832931,0.04393087,0.00008178866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004404111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021545887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004404111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030966668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029245377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008756936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035752209","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.026","title":"Demographic analysis of trade-offs with deliberate fragmentation of streams: Control of invasive species versus protection of native species","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"Saint Joseph University; University of Guelph","keywords":"Petromyzon; Lamprey; Ecology; Habitat; Invasive species; Fishery; Population; Fragmentation (computing); Biology; Introduced species; Fish migration; Habitat destruction; Habitat fragmentation","score_opus":0.06321791285195763,"score_gpt":0.2211057491785301,"score_spread":0.15788783632657247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035752209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99903107,0.000016687743,0.0004533613,0.000031377913,0.0000010477335,0.0000037587176,0.00006302972,0.0000022856877,0.00039744747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995535,0.0000065289614,0.0002231806,0.0000056188883,0.0000015607285,0.0000047949375,0.000050943487,0.0000015958153,0.0001521353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993679,0.00040392723,0.000035007044,0.00008132569,0.000047168443,0.00006472161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799065,0.015108887,0.0026524484,0.0008957304,0.00056922325,0.00086712616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037958454,0.00015078536,0.00022677208,0.0005836689,0.00031942368,0.0007091752,0.00055232464,0.0004943532,0.004669728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014947998,0.00016448615,0.00048905,0.0004194887,0.00074425194,0.0006207849,0.00050158723,0.0005379261,0.00017257387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022977914,0.00035145477,0.94171995,0.00004736863,0.00029703134,0.00015621849,0.0002877513,0.03174231,0.0048667747,0.0075263795,0.000314071,0.0103928335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005732833,0.00089723774,0.8992424,0.0000071908953,0.00013710055,0.0003715657,0.00063853577,0.09206342,0.000987915,0.0051160185,0.00045217498,0.000029016865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011072968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028163425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004669728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005941038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022323112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020074606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037547705","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.011","title":"Bird community structure across riparian buffer strips of varying width in a coastal temperate forest","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Species richness; Riparian buffer; Buffer strip; Riparian zone; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Habitat; Riparian forest; Temperate rainforest; Species diversity; Fauna; Old-growth forest; Environmental science; Relative species abundance; Geography; Biology; Water quality; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.04023476829040812,"score_gpt":0.27557707790943825,"score_spread":0.23534230961903013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037547705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9999076,0.000007028692,0.000011734137,0.0000019038984,1.7943958e-7,6.737105e-7,0.000021711923,6.1884964e-7,0.000048414517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975044,0.000007134553,0.00006231987,0.000004274329,4.0929226e-7,0.0000029959244,0.00005571266,7.457616e-7,0.00011609766],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997924,0.00004591005,0.000014323458,0.000074112766,0.000021508722,0.00005183916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992005,0.0001683831,0.00017972453,0.00005835241,0.00012969268,0.00026332654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029893668,0.00016086242,0.00029504628,0.00069453183,0.000768502,0.0006607686,0.0005569936,0.00028904015,0.0008966625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084807473,0.00025641487,0.00015965353,0.00070638536,0.00079349463,0.0003493983,0.00068391615,0.00018688089,0.00014333775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004833411,0.000091798545,0.9894811,0.000021709535,0.00006473363,0.00022845139,0.0020899472,0.00027511493,0.004949979,0.00005578621,0.000070916125,0.0021872378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048159936,0.000034622117,0.9984804,0.000002035208,0.0000095456035,0.000041489686,0.0010805456,0.00024323734,0.00005507956,0.000010606283,0.00003511573,0.0000025551974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061695058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23499848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061695058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072408636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043609572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1226719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038411382","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.024","title":"Ecological and life-history traits predict bee species responses to environmental disturbances","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":736,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Division of Environmental Biology; National Center For Environmental Assessment","keywords":"Ecology; Habitat; Guild; Life history theory; Habitat fragmentation; Biology; Habitat destruction; Trait; Environmental change; Geography; Climate change; Life history","score_opus":0.07572017065011115,"score_gpt":0.1997943729723419,"score_spread":0.12407420232223075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038411382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99971265,0.000014886873,0.000025330284,0.000010367164,9.694749e-7,0.0000013860981,0.000029311743,9.341291e-7,0.00020412832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997317,0.00001237405,0.00003776783,0.000012246367,0.0000011682683,0.0000016922347,0.00005209461,0.0000015852594,0.00014937039],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987876,0.000039654933,0.000008607428,0.000023571078,0.000012634279,0.000036740283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987368,0.00044390178,0.0003525168,0.00007484345,0.0000615542,0.0003304346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028998303,0.0001878438,0.00015604899,0.00045456563,0.00029090763,0.000504278,0.00017973642,0.00041336496,0.0024407592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012541577,0.00017917022,0.00018845915,0.00027558923,0.00030831984,0.00030773133,0.00029030335,0.00036581734,0.0002412979],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033717667,0.00019732844,0.98203087,0.000010209453,0.00008012617,0.000090770685,0.00010688742,0.0002878981,0.014153844,0.000042597767,0.00007456638,0.002587706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019809727,0.000027951022,0.9994072,5.174841e-7,0.0000054086863,0.000027754433,0.000052612635,0.00023910205,0.00018750751,0.000020943953,0.000028020388,9.850598e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015359415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060365084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024407592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019581636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009918139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008165121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042956121","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2005.07.007","title":"Small mammals in agricultural landscapes of Prince Edward Island (Canada): Effects of habitat characteristics at three different spatial scales","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Species richness; Forage; Population; Biology","score_opus":0.016024251128880247,"score_gpt":0.20374104578598065,"score_spread":0.1877167946571004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042956121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99949026,0.00014033624,0.000018574456,0.000030185109,0.0000011758476,0.000003410465,0.00009892069,9.330329e-7,0.00021616941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991716,0.00014148111,0.000075666576,0.000026771324,0.0000017035667,0.0000051353995,0.00017584235,0.0000027079134,0.00039913796],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995047,0.000089752015,0.000021530419,0.00009810374,0.000091009126,0.00019482069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802005,0.00038285274,0.000374479,0.000089251516,0.00052570115,0.00060760346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056632597,0.00027455125,0.00040518367,0.0009815384,0.0018710125,0.0014645375,0.0011791606,0.0005163107,0.0014215173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021594327,0.0003807242,0.00040867456,0.0022211908,0.002183669,0.0005603581,0.0011790291,0.00044894108,0.00014334555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003213409,0.00004278808,0.9922841,0.00003680218,0.00016501114,0.00013648812,0.0021746694,0.00028308813,0.0014485973,0.000103611615,0.00021239478,0.0027910278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024517265,0.000009523517,0.9984756,0.0000041408825,0.000013050268,0.000021467493,0.0012949592,0.000073078096,0.00002228852,0.00001059315,0.00007020571,0.0000027130739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94897515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99100995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051024854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066166087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004999188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10265064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046178366","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.10.025","title":"A tropical perspective on conserving the boreal ‘lung of the planet’","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Planet; Boreal; Astrobiology; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Astronomy; Biology; Physics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03504458090541746,"score_gpt":0.22703636869210286,"score_spread":0.1919917877866854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046178366","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030790882,0.08053377,0.0052200244,0.64550793,0.008280915,0.00004181598,0.00031474783,0.00008587982,0.22922398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8095341,0.057196163,0.005922971,0.09341754,0.008660995,0.00010633555,0.00012952808,0.000104440056,0.02492791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991007,0.0002680543,0.000030231813,0.00009431297,0.0001252854,0.00038137988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985189,0.00035780313,0.00016187446,0.000114092174,0.00026076613,0.00058658223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021492457,0.0005391645,0.0005020045,0.0008290443,0.003372818,0.0036972172,0.0014618057,0.0024833407,0.01160621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002063251,0.00013941483,0.00034562667,0.0009486543,0.0075228466,0.0050643864,0.0024604974,0.0061263135,0.00032545012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030947532,0.00014207266,0.005408398,0.0012498145,0.00020616346,0.0010800546,0.012940047,0.0028792992,0.0070233624,0.75929654,0.10471207,0.10475271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005218145,0.00013471338,0.015859613,0.00076871144,0.00008691159,0.00064096594,0.013473441,0.0005736999,0.0008774411,0.17715107,0.79031193,0.00006927794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03821977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11010421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96178025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030888931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005559557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07599461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046389321","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.08.001","title":"Range fidelity: The missing link between caribou decline and habitat alteration?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Université du Québec à Rimouski; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Habitat; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Geography; Predation; Home range; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.03607624438249423,"score_gpt":0.2630641670988499,"score_spread":0.22698792271635565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046389321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8652418,0.048209388,0.00517749,0.062223118,0.0017751126,0.000035946938,0.001911403,0.00009890873,0.015326694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904777,0.004815245,0.0006272075,0.0017722002,0.0010259012,0.000009418427,0.00022688284,0.000017221113,0.0010282054],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984018,0.0005593301,0.00015726248,0.00046598754,0.00018721067,0.00022843857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98234934,0.009493994,0.004143614,0.0015877992,0.0011249754,0.0013001651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004527127,0.00045889412,0.0008720343,0.0010004768,0.00053561456,0.0022424464,0.0013804146,0.0029265815,0.015456505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025119867,0.00060997345,0.00055237283,0.0010806184,0.001888911,0.00356171,0.001396943,0.0023887486,0.0008727833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000373919,0.00027011032,0.917324,0.00033069245,0.0009652367,0.00064249407,0.00047419695,0.00039247732,0.00047512155,0.0037885595,0.003628261,0.07133494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026834856,0.00018277483,0.9801585,0.00043112534,0.00050819956,0.0015418519,0.0022319716,0.0020928127,0.00011859644,0.008781911,0.0038774963,0.000047991565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010972558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01946911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015456505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037587012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007650604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05170715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046471311","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.026","title":"Cavity characteristics, but not habitat, influence nest survival of cavity-nesting birds along a gradient of human impact in the subtropical Atlantic Forest","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Columbus Zoo and Aquarium; Idea Wild; Neotropical Bird Club; National Geographic Society","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Habitat; Ecology; Predation; Tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests; Subtropics; Tree line; Secondary forest; Biology; Occupancy; Geography","score_opus":0.06328362382506061,"score_gpt":0.29261346645682723,"score_spread":0.22932984263176662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046471311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99991775,0.000009687342,0.000006430492,0.000004548787,4.5539238e-7,2.8352696e-7,0.0000072175612,1.9315269e-7,0.000053471933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99987745,0.000008509572,0.000010822325,0.0000036880356,6.462857e-7,4.366224e-7,0.000014443085,3.053408e-7,0.00008362035],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999025,0.000023895207,0.0000050075896,0.000019016576,0.000012647998,0.00003694953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937326,0.00011831968,0.00020675878,0.00003890084,0.000054101514,0.00020866896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018250944,0.00012612123,0.000121194804,0.00022600277,0.00037184422,0.00034877265,0.00029551305,0.0002084957,0.0011850134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069805473,0.00011689348,0.00015162375,0.00022768331,0.00044087853,0.00019315055,0.0003577075,0.00026541014,0.00010621758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005370364,0.000022448345,0.9981456,0.0000021125177,0.000016013408,0.000031260595,0.00021898709,0.000030579922,0.00069166353,0.000007726767,0.000018048919,0.00076188816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.7174013e-7,0.000007560769,0.99966264,6.061472e-7,0.000002886702,0.000012491842,0.00022500321,0.00005864239,0.000013386883,0.0000038185735,0.000012070397,5.035129e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05009407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19895563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05009407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025329398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029342374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099604964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046548020","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(99)00067-1","title":"Reef classification by coral morphology predicts coral reef conservation value","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Coral reef; Acropora; Reef; Coral reef organizations; Aquaculture of coral; Environmental issues with coral reefs; Coral reef protection; Coral; Resilience of coral reefs; Fishery; Ecology; Biodiversity; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.044684788785370216,"score_gpt":0.23726847038019938,"score_spread":0.19258368159482916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046548020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984273,0.00007285071,0.00011969498,0.00012607995,0.000006870264,0.0000028929178,0.00008920852,0.0000035598705,0.0011515857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994029,0.000035703037,0.00006742282,0.000020687841,0.0000058588666,0.000001596622,0.000107009204,0.000003699379,0.0003551834],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961203,0.00016328995,0.000022670034,0.00006112748,0.00006005624,0.000080843485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989796,0.0043086484,0.0030679351,0.0008579119,0.0006544116,0.0013151244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014137817,0.00027572407,0.00024047452,0.0010453908,0.00035541644,0.0011011547,0.0004033104,0.0006545478,0.005531106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106849745,0.00020390624,0.00045622414,0.00092653313,0.00065097347,0.0008472351,0.0005634336,0.0006770032,0.0007504205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006716685,0.000029323111,0.997577,0.0000021950573,0.00004378762,0.00001412539,0.000031233525,0.00020411187,0.00019619704,0.000046186888,0.00013599999,0.001652559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004733612,0.000041753723,0.997442,0.000003637737,0.000028454971,0.00008042877,0.00019849083,0.0017735969,0.00006459996,0.0002557399,0.000103877006,0.0000027353124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00927698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018257983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00927698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037619454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031419523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018503368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050047271","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.007","title":"Conifer plantations consistently act as barriers to movement in a deciduous forest songbird: A translocation experiment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds en Fiducie pour la Faune du Nouveau-Brunswick","keywords":"Songbird; Habitat; Fragmentation (computing); Deciduous; Ecology; Habitat fragmentation; Habitat destruction; Resistance (ecology); Geography; Insectivore; Biology","score_opus":0.03122150400635014,"score_gpt":0.275781344082868,"score_spread":0.24455984007651782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050047271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997937,0.0000059627023,0.00003907813,0.0000081152,0.0000016591321,0.0000023171037,0.000010660213,0.000001721249,0.00013680592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916685,0.000014694665,0.00022132309,0.00004336266,0.0000028007812,0.000019025903,0.00005449051,0.0000073638907,0.0004700069],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993418,0.0002828937,0.000031587908,0.00016028465,0.00004758632,0.00013586367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658775,0.0010524451,0.0009279535,0.00053505687,0.00014284377,0.0007539606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011133315,0.00043138,0.00045979634,0.0004336883,0.0011946964,0.00076716556,0.0006969918,0.0007415886,0.0019871462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016889273,0.00041139722,0.00016052133,0.00029950525,0.001680773,0.00067962456,0.0007064874,0.00078662747,0.00028178087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018186152,0.005151292,0.60159445,0.00008416261,0.00022599108,0.00038448736,0.0025502932,0.0010277202,0.3606456,0.0010855132,0.00043377298,0.008630617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037793675,0.0032242667,0.9809575,0.000012178459,0.00013293758,0.00018984824,0.002069344,0.0016446151,0.0104208235,0.00033297803,0.0006139766,0.00002358421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008792733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024084449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008792733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047867926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061793847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017483115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050798716","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.018","title":"Population genetic structure in polar bears (Ursus maritimus) from Hudson Bay, Canada: Implications of future climate change","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus maritimus; Bay; Biological dispersal; Arctic; Population; Sea ice; Geography; Ecology; Genetic structure; Habitat; Biology; Genetic variation; Demography","score_opus":0.046805919877192285,"score_gpt":0.23398461707627327,"score_spread":0.18717869719908098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050798716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986343,0.0002852015,0.00008107672,0.00010351878,0.0000056620565,0.000004053527,0.000447966,0.0000020784698,0.0004360467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988147,0.00024217633,0.00013755733,0.000025264631,0.0000036522292,0.000003125917,0.00033808785,0.0000017844908,0.00043365633],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969244,0.00003376255,0.000013889871,0.000088642526,0.00007374179,0.000097505384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924004,0.00005370575,0.00009455958,0.000030047606,0.0004228694,0.00015878167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047868563,0.00015946214,0.0002488149,0.001150648,0.0013236854,0.00066071126,0.00062396936,0.0002709918,0.00082723453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008270788,0.00014455123,0.00026558887,0.0022381116,0.0008942799,0.00024207677,0.00043383866,0.00034984743,0.00008974957],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006722763,0.000013729031,0.9910693,0.000018387967,0.000084480096,0.00007597697,0.0016112772,0.00030305114,0.00089720514,0.00017793487,0.0003709558,0.0053104954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018808079,0.0000051063384,0.99868125,0.000005999182,0.000012119502,0.000024260034,0.000878327,0.00008297347,0.000023845478,0.0000186254,0.0002627157,0.000002843496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9754245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024575472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006753851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00764798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049440324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053400752","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.08.006","title":"Patterns of protection and threats along productivity gradients in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; University of British Columbia; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Productivity; Biodiversity; Protected area; Geography; IUCN Red List; Photosynthetically active radiation; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Physical geography; Ecology; Proxy (statistics); Environmental resource management; Biology","score_opus":0.06096425694529837,"score_gpt":0.2180387734875444,"score_spread":0.15707451654224605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053400752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975794,0.0003471779,0.000049340062,0.0003257339,0.000003927265,0.0000057243633,0.00035584404,0.0000050597273,0.0013278642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982986,0.00020919395,0.000081024504,0.000041650488,0.0000016987975,0.000002939007,0.00018996098,0.00000349457,0.0011714792],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999432,0.000038488153,0.000023084624,0.000082698236,0.00012347056,0.0003001647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970035,0.0003046832,0.0005672409,0.00007154466,0.000997801,0.001055174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041735318,0.0001832832,0.0003376825,0.0021570236,0.0042163725,0.0017180437,0.00089600263,0.00053828745,0.002498668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021336947,0.0003243944,0.00029335634,0.0037341837,0.0023009507,0.0004963628,0.0013070157,0.0006655859,0.00014787666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016610402,0.000039506926,0.9774686,0.00003880784,0.00008380312,0.00013008692,0.0054293056,0.000611461,0.00075768423,0.0010875395,0.0014286668,0.012758487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047549847,0.0000086530035,0.9953571,0.00001987375,0.0000102313015,0.000032312473,0.003052432,0.00027194124,0.000058129124,0.000092199116,0.0010831547,0.0000091850125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026449434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026449434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025887042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19190496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054390591","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2012.10.025","title":"Commercial harvesting of Ficus timber – An emerging threat to frugivorous wildlife and sustainable forestry","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Frugivore; Wildlife; Agroforestry; Forestry; Geography; Ficus; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Habitat; Botany","score_opus":0.030598952529756734,"score_gpt":0.2638250916741914,"score_spread":0.23322613914443466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054390591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92637485,0.007878098,0.0006792802,0.0047272937,0.000117722935,0.00001693403,0.0001483149,0.000032790802,0.0600247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986127,0.005017505,0.0005554729,0.0007582831,0.00022511507,0.0000055383184,0.00015017406,0.000009882126,0.0071508475],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970335,0.000056397592,0.000008979687,0.000051180938,0.000107297405,0.0000728324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946195,0.0001250022,0.00019821698,0.000038090446,0.00008503153,0.0000916515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004047922,0.0002805411,0.00010692253,0.0009909298,0.0018685848,0.0013547326,0.00043874682,0.00070460775,0.0047101714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006570682,0.00008524776,0.00010411847,0.000955843,0.0012385212,0.0013138014,0.00049493386,0.0004922293,0.0009494903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036434236,0.00044639988,0.27373374,0.00041100607,0.00009332115,0.004881644,0.007411866,0.00047028248,0.048117384,0.014156481,0.02176412,0.62814945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070161914,0.0004406015,0.84780204,0.00020310671,0.00004659752,0.012283505,0.013938716,0.0010916702,0.004472963,0.006038921,0.11362506,0.00004990534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011924928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037924487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011924928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006433207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004019331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023711026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056269783","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.09.004","title":"Removal of introduced predators, but not artificial refuge supplementation, increases skink survival in coastal duneland","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Exclosure; Predator; Predation; Skink; Ecology; Biology; Invasive species; Lizard; Grazing","score_opus":0.030421210830362568,"score_gpt":0.25730552816146957,"score_spread":0.226884317331107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056269783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996761,0.00003890057,0.00001792515,0.000022981694,0.000007689149,0.0000019357703,0.000014252684,0.0000043585537,0.00021583098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969733,0.00012974192,0.00026397977,0.000060179522,0.0000028976474,0.000015155376,0.000062380175,0.0000064343735,0.0024860045],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988055,0.000021271553,0.000008979181,0.00004307492,0.000016583594,0.000029553841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994417,0.00009493534,0.00012563428,0.00005003843,0.00003746819,0.00025031724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019262638,0.00024792354,0.00034075553,0.00016090383,0.0003763655,0.0005629135,0.0003401004,0.0003164695,0.0037651705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005953103,0.00017733089,0.00020445835,0.00009979176,0.00035243004,0.0003228893,0.00038135445,0.000375377,0.00027416152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.033192623,0.003986935,0.10858444,0.0006485378,0.00042999024,0.0012411812,0.0014749817,0.00094288064,0.8073995,0.00040227806,0.0020678386,0.0396289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005199658,0.016131777,0.8929438,0.00010350961,0.0003400961,0.0006576896,0.0029018733,0.0022316757,0.07989458,0.00027644288,0.0039337813,0.000064844986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012319205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060911663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012319205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009716678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056853745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024495006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056733293","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.05.026","title":"Fire management for biodiversity conservation: Key research questions and our capacity to answer them","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":498,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Adaptive management; Environmental resource management; Scope (computer science); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Sustainable management; Management science; Environmental planning; Ecology; Business; Geography; Engineering; Environmental science; Sustainability","score_opus":0.11639882355831213,"score_gpt":0.30006490197184527,"score_spread":0.18366607841353313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056733293","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007855041,0.307892,0.0073399576,0.6567394,0.006617229,0.000054381562,0.00024244808,0.000041450334,0.013218111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33626813,0.47344267,0.023962576,0.11231767,0.047636814,0.00044087824,0.0003495819,0.00010371059,0.005477922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945478,0.0027275227,0.00041641566,0.00076570985,0.0008669243,0.0006757076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8857616,0.09156858,0.007144251,0.0023059633,0.009523737,0.0036957832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025894776,0.0019867858,0.0034245064,0.0017936204,0.0044698035,0.014473274,0.0049420893,0.019830931,0.024205688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0482449,0.0007486851,0.0010304943,0.003600276,0.027387552,0.02468737,0.0047086673,0.010024193,0.0017668281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009306823,0.0011022232,0.008430282,0.010444172,0.00053175207,0.00088194705,0.0031742088,0.005913582,0.0018981372,0.4440846,0.14529677,0.37731165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001229205,0.00017649174,0.004512945,0.00376072,0.00018719128,0.00032748518,0.013873395,0.0041783876,0.00040359193,0.85930115,0.112986095,0.00016961717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006324806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008378084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025894776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045146975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015024743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13694632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056812645","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.01.026","title":"The effects of including marine ecological values in terrestrial reserve planning for a forest-nesting seabird","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts","keywords":"Habitat; Marine reserve; Ecology; Nature reserve; Terrestrial ecosystem; Seabird; Marine protected area; Habitat conservation; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Geography; Biology; Predation","score_opus":0.048299055147897,"score_gpt":0.29177499787200833,"score_spread":0.24347594272411133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056812645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98797125,0.00027931138,0.00050985126,0.0011134843,0.000040079034,0.00003427334,0.00011469914,0.000011891587,0.009925159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833786,0.00007168763,0.0009688673,0.00009602933,0.000015098626,0.000011413182,0.000035500612,0.000002847655,0.00046065298],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969127,0.0023051032,0.0001051715,0.00015315211,0.00026817477,0.0002556588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9560771,0.035504326,0.0029016547,0.0011663068,0.0021435837,0.002206994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005557159,0.00036960636,0.000293914,0.00054449006,0.0011955997,0.002002385,0.0010288395,0.0011232466,0.0056713144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036579035,0.00028256132,0.0005976509,0.00072454225,0.0011165299,0.0018499284,0.0011077836,0.0011394097,0.00025328118],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0076532564,0.005123726,0.75084233,0.0003641424,0.00064615224,0.0007546609,0.001297842,0.06718487,0.0016019655,0.004611965,0.0039112633,0.15600777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044446642,0.0053592613,0.9016417,0.00031891547,0.001689205,0.00047423178,0.00567919,0.06898818,0.002749516,0.005733353,0.0068148524,0.00010704288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02959835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.123305425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02959835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018420585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024268448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058852136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058340791","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2003.10.007","title":"Comparison of Coleoptera assemblages from a recently burned and unburned black spruce forests of northeastern North America","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Geography; Taiga; Boreal; Black spruce; Ecology; Habitat; Forestry; Interception; Fire regime; Fire ecology; Environmental science; Ecosystem; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06128688466937263,"score_gpt":0.25753078716312505,"score_spread":0.19624390249375243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058340791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99971086,0.000051009316,0.000012565845,0.000004100698,7.753655e-7,0.0000019364468,0.00007783334,4.989211e-7,0.00014026726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988638,0.0001134119,0.00013846664,0.000019435824,0.0000021721664,0.0000071770933,0.000464662,0.0000011826364,0.00038977148],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998617,0.000024474588,0.000010476675,0.000041699674,0.00002650466,0.000035090343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999551,0.00007479025,0.00011131532,0.000017150782,0.0001240374,0.00012166661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018245235,0.00020453909,0.00018407904,0.0012730791,0.0010465164,0.00042304615,0.00018734904,0.00016803076,0.0008329406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003796579,0.00015015849,0.00012290021,0.0007376549,0.00042949925,0.00030784518,0.00038537357,0.00016561251,0.00010909502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029821935,0.00006961665,0.9705451,0.00006103028,0.000081765655,0.00022307497,0.006803451,0.000060501017,0.0146067245,0.000034145054,0.00014606249,0.0070702345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.992351e-7,0.000012434565,0.99879456,0.0000021524634,0.000005038115,0.000043336582,0.0009191165,0.000016153517,0.00007000446,0.0000028238335,0.0001326055,7.9333455e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11623586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45843858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11623586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062023813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040584817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23111856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059869452","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00178-7","title":"Human disturbance and nesting success of Common Eiders: interaction between visitors and gulls","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Parks Canada; Louisiana State University","keywords":"Eider; Nesting (process); Nest (protein structural motif); Incubation; Predation; Disturbance (geology); Ecology; Wildlife; Incubation period; Biology","score_opus":0.07083191640565062,"score_gpt":0.2893350778020185,"score_spread":0.21850316139636788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059869452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99981767,0.000036410416,0.000006713625,0.00001481723,0.0000014091646,5.6449886e-7,0.00002493765,7.9460557e-7,0.00009672005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99982136,0.000014888648,0.000012093886,0.000011902914,0.0000020921673,0.000001199726,0.00003485559,9.480851e-7,0.00010058242],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968743,0.00013041426,0.000021865028,0.0000479862,0.000024996376,0.00008737031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754924,0.0006381035,0.00084932806,0.00013776145,0.00012272227,0.0007028343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044961768,0.00017000447,0.0002758879,0.00047662447,0.00051311165,0.0006579784,0.00032449432,0.0006139591,0.0023759673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019913816,0.00023117801,0.0003173983,0.0004182411,0.0007660967,0.00042505472,0.00045543897,0.00041940712,0.00022099752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002461244,0.00004767896,0.99818486,0.000004500151,0.000059376933,0.00008418979,0.00018719782,0.000046829504,0.0005245108,0.000016394035,0.000059945618,0.0005384392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001920103,0.000041130148,0.9995196,9.883354e-7,0.000010274617,0.00008339248,0.00020870291,0.00006643677,0.0000256172,0.0000075495936,0.00003249789,0.0000018876594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02121364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075259626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02121364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037550714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024800748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04218036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061492867","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.04.025","title":"Dissecting habitat loss and fragmentation effects following logging in boreal forest: Conservation perspectives from landscape simulations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Wildlife; Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Fragmentation (computing); Habitat destruction; Habitat fragmentation; Ecology; Habitat; Taiga; Biodiversity; Species richness; Landscape ecology; Abundance (ecology); Clearcutting; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.01429101955274813,"score_gpt":0.25111377587123246,"score_spread":0.23682275631848432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061492867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99821484,0.000052385247,0.00077351596,0.00012067932,0.00000798946,0.000007841329,0.0000905072,0.000010253448,0.00072205754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990151,0.000029049432,0.0006877381,0.000020471854,0.0000040192585,0.000007590807,0.000064480024,0.0000041015655,0.00016740726],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969184,0.0001723005,0.00001931284,0.00004563402,0.000022569073,0.00004839525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99565166,0.003435209,0.00036572802,0.00013484056,0.00014152424,0.00027117576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016613805,0.00040192832,0.0005258176,0.00046657023,0.0005349432,0.0010111998,0.0009012974,0.0010187998,0.0014681317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067433864,0.00035957823,0.00055141863,0.00055835245,0.00079083076,0.0014036949,0.00053122453,0.000685735,0.000058339647],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006793899,0.0004779189,0.08595863,0.000052194533,0.00019570459,0.0001345498,0.0002517639,0.90284944,0.00068862503,0.0022904682,0.0005678621,0.005853446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008148202,0.00030648496,0.031123504,0.000010149082,0.000088096014,0.000045524695,0.00052689086,0.9652094,0.00022136378,0.0021517824,0.00021506794,0.00002026908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05769781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08536643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05769781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011125157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000718703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11472392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062471848","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(99)00185-8","title":"Status and conservation of the gray wolf (Canis lupus) in wildlife reserves of Québec","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Canis; Gray wolf; Threatened species; Poaching; Geography; Nature reserve; Population; Predation; Ecology; Wildlife conservation; Forestry; Habitat; Biology; Demography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02353941462638394,"score_gpt":0.2292791473160979,"score_spread":0.20573973268971396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062471848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950912,0.00072425103,0.00002794529,0.0006245754,0.000008304322,0.000010534092,0.0006612398,0.0000036809013,0.002848274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970368,0.00025104758,0.00004714552,0.00007751167,0.000003935819,0.0000046441364,0.00019960263,0.0000018201777,0.0023774905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963355,0.000065318476,0.00001651927,0.00004051039,0.0000796715,0.00016428113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981008,0.00015414043,0.00040915995,0.000040992876,0.0007762685,0.00051868876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059179665,0.00009460559,0.00015032325,0.0011621885,0.0015901414,0.00094127737,0.00081439846,0.0004365761,0.003436771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017510359,0.000108411405,0.00012865712,0.0013671891,0.00082206045,0.0005059548,0.00038856253,0.00038005388,0.00017436451],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011828843,0.000070739894,0.9831881,0.000033659417,0.000044026943,0.00022865471,0.0016162514,0.0002971996,0.00043875107,0.0006904277,0.0026403284,0.01063362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006138823,0.000013816015,0.9969168,0.000021732865,0.000009596102,0.000060354796,0.0011928543,0.00024482285,0.00003552721,0.000029072387,0.0014647472,0.000004615942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98786604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012704255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012704255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007959788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09217626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063425988","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00341-5","title":"Black bear (Ursus americanus) survival and demography in the Bow Valley of Banff National Park, Alberta","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Ursus; National park; Demography; Population; Vital rates; Geography; Wildlife management; Mark and recapture; Mortality rate; Biology; Ecology; Population growth; Habitat","score_opus":0.03357097316575039,"score_gpt":0.23878213727173703,"score_spread":0.20521116410598664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063425988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990074,0.00013012311,0.00002660585,0.000057306148,0.0000040257414,0.0000033282204,0.00021816931,0.000002788555,0.0005503001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980895,0.00014012928,0.000067334986,0.000035101177,0.0000032470757,0.0000039886504,0.00039167082,0.0000026163145,0.0012664729],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997234,0.00003995757,0.000008940891,0.0000505988,0.000050758,0.00012632394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993994,0.000050749586,0.00010422578,0.000023332157,0.000197614,0.00022455495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003636471,0.00021460887,0.00023990864,0.0010667132,0.0019866508,0.000759016,0.0009756121,0.0003852259,0.0010353038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006815757,0.00028114382,0.00019816453,0.0014341316,0.0009130473,0.00040136333,0.00055470195,0.00046855377,0.00016763851],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016173546,0.00006575243,0.99227,0.000011502986,0.000048587313,0.00017629638,0.0014642411,0.0002869476,0.00042436525,0.000110196226,0.00097102375,0.0040092343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030618514,0.0000071946483,0.9981055,0.0000050036124,0.0000097512975,0.0000466153,0.0014639137,0.00011953312,0.000022159873,0.000014667679,0.00019908539,0.0000034196175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9708429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99319744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029157102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006394925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051142946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058657587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064066418","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.07.016","title":"Continental-scale assessment of the hybrid zone between bobcat and Canada lynx","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Introgression; Sympatry; Hybrid; Backcrossing; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Biology; Population; Ecology; Geography; Zoology; Sympatric speciation; Genetics; Botany; Demography","score_opus":0.013557417434025923,"score_gpt":0.23012950805023374,"score_spread":0.21657209061620783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064066418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984818,0.00012005673,0.00010517502,0.000017686563,0.000001343322,0.000004113632,0.00020055927,0.0000026830885,0.0010666241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930155,0.000042670003,0.00014370684,0.0000110918645,7.1973466e-7,0.0000033154245,0.0002427963,0.0000019586669,0.00025220134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975604,0.000040421844,0.000008572345,0.00008742008,0.000053599084,0.000053908407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993826,0.00009894721,0.00011028279,0.00002991133,0.00026229993,0.00011582098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050188374,0.00015290956,0.00023570888,0.0015986976,0.0014054901,0.0008464621,0.00043313697,0.0002908635,0.0011400525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009717062,0.00013097309,0.0001329671,0.0017424469,0.0007854683,0.00021986155,0.00084529014,0.00023796313,0.00014466498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005487838,0.00004700862,0.96098644,0.000044731412,0.00015469035,0.0002974067,0.002436935,0.0013194616,0.020690542,0.0005984498,0.00031635538,0.012559169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003188804,0.000007994267,0.99821365,0.00000608863,0.000010518946,0.000027169584,0.00084890064,0.00027513813,0.00014402486,0.000017934159,0.0004426526,0.000002724053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7109017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87247664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28909832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034337298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018371824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58160174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064728061","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.11.019","title":"Second chance for the plains bison","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":173,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Bison bison; Introgression; Endangered species; Geography; Biodiversity; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Grassland; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.04430881076701486,"score_gpt":0.28041553285691334,"score_spread":0.23610672208989847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064728061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82360494,0.0017897844,0.0028393331,0.02214337,0.001296933,0.0000518212,0.00023177385,0.00017568508,0.14786634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8677865,0.00024405796,0.0016259679,0.0028164869,0.0001427859,0.000022381486,0.00009882391,0.00005512404,0.12720782],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995634,0.000062614396,0.000006972398,0.000121346675,0.000071683906,0.00017380866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935824,0.00004601141,0.000049779333,0.00006486372,0.000074688025,0.0004064575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009959912,0.00037432017,0.00039130825,0.0004151143,0.004255585,0.0016275754,0.000392565,0.0012567837,0.029947346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095502555,0.00014742994,0.00017329576,0.0002003876,0.0011020362,0.0008177142,0.0014207433,0.0017389777,0.0021782666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036422824,0.0011889117,0.19638866,0.00023877164,0.00021349908,0.009723696,0.011632356,0.0010211045,0.063307926,0.28191146,0.08509712,0.34563428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000212232,0.0019353675,0.22868943,0.00029638,0.00012702258,0.011574138,0.014334353,0.0031680388,0.0092375735,0.049875002,0.68038946,0.00016099693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0092549315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034696333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029947346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092683156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010035076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100183845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066719943","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.05.020","title":"Metapopulation dynamics and threatened species management: Why does the broad-toothed rat (Mastacomys fuscus) persist?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Metapopulation; Threatened species; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Habitat; Population; Demography; Biological dispersal; Sociology","score_opus":0.033245649721309396,"score_gpt":0.2076862867625211,"score_spread":0.1744406370412117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066719943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930548,0.001661694,0.00026744546,0.0033877357,0.000021262776,0.0000015671811,0.000041085255,0.000006261155,0.0015581057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933773,0.00028353324,0.000067290865,0.00014599426,0.00001925121,8.0972586e-7,0.000010976784,0.0000011776724,0.00013313392],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985576,0.000042734162,0.0000059831236,0.000032978118,0.00001682805,0.0000457927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987613,0.00033075226,0.00045433897,0.000062983025,0.00014905828,0.00024155469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008255946,0.00012826269,0.00020793622,0.0003915021,0.0003917052,0.0009863417,0.0005193148,0.0010419586,0.0019590296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002910083,0.000113629176,0.00012509405,0.0003796409,0.0016363802,0.001199353,0.00038172086,0.00041227174,0.00013108767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022349338,0.00013705932,0.9143105,0.00012978721,0.00018398729,0.00045539247,0.0015698225,0.0014334938,0.0064096297,0.009246389,0.0025647164,0.063335635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014447659,0.000092199225,0.976408,0.00004533293,0.00008717259,0.00039962356,0.003748462,0.0048517333,0.00036443007,0.011881664,0.0020875703,0.000019357642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009575087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0291077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009575087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006788194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040669812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019038737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068727316","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.006","title":"Incorporating uncertainty into analyses of red-crested pochard habitat selection","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé","keywords":"Habitat; Brood; Ecology; Biology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Habitat fragmentation","score_opus":0.05586320982887089,"score_gpt":0.2962033709055535,"score_spread":0.2403401610766826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068727316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88141024,0.0008365226,0.114604615,0.0004437724,0.00005903021,0.000023909573,0.00020522735,0.00008649706,0.002330045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937809,0.000052047868,0.0057256976,0.000052787902,0.000015590374,0.0000074789596,0.000046056746,0.000020484798,0.0002988529],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99521106,0.0031401876,0.00020588569,0.0005521317,0.0005423853,0.00034834532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93920076,0.055555232,0.0020598962,0.0018074971,0.00088653306,0.00049008057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01597164,0.0005311881,0.00084128976,0.0009498698,0.0010804398,0.0023970522,0.0012227719,0.00096499023,0.0010950378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06915128,0.0006252424,0.0012772001,0.0009968722,0.0011203672,0.0022946715,0.001762369,0.0015258234,0.0000742202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004141894,0.00006073915,0.192215,0.0000951841,0.0016807186,0.00031181105,0.00056421483,0.7595097,0.0010001753,0.018095464,0.00047168895,0.025581157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027454826,0.00014052748,0.06355179,0.000050835148,0.0003765523,0.00016212853,0.00027052456,0.89458144,0.0006769989,0.03921461,0.0008763148,0.000070791364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014073806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02693073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01597164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012257822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009877816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08446717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069575561","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.005","title":"Narwhals and seismic exploration: Is seismic noise increasing the risk of ice entrapments?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Seismic Waves and Analysis","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pinngortitaleriffik","keywords":"Geology; Seismology","score_opus":0.049967072876039534,"score_gpt":0.23541436097400853,"score_spread":0.185447288097969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069575561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99165386,0.0015796042,0.00041539842,0.0018804896,0.0000446773,0.000010122847,0.00007141796,0.000005466327,0.0043389746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972218,0.0013110525,0.0002027849,0.00019122247,0.000078651676,0.000005633327,0.000044251105,0.0000020898824,0.00094246416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995277,0.00017274554,0.00003027899,0.00006882393,0.000112738104,0.000087764776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700433,0.0007425368,0.0013215549,0.00014427821,0.000343991,0.00044341286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006047886,0.00028382597,0.00033878218,0.00073563313,0.00064109644,0.00084500504,0.0002857483,0.0010012611,0.0063221306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060308147,0.00017498643,0.0002737337,0.0004887713,0.00096653047,0.00065418205,0.00081294856,0.0005695807,0.00035607777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011657294,0.000052660274,0.9824829,0.000045535136,0.00005863495,0.00043101545,0.0005285885,0.00006768146,0.0003983038,0.00019265304,0.0002912269,0.015334137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033992058,0.00018832664,0.9926286,0.00010946291,0.000056635497,0.0008988902,0.003738535,0.00040180446,0.0001937914,0.0005387907,0.0012308761,0.000010898538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009555554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01549611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009555554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038192963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047699056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021149576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070180465","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.10.032","title":"Soil and climate are better than biotic land cover for predicting home-range habitat selection by endangered burrowing owls across the Canadian Prairies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Abiotic component; Ecology; Habitat; Land cover; Range (aeronautics); Environmental science; Endangered species; Geography; Grassland; Habitat fragmentation; Land use; Biology","score_opus":0.03252151380067326,"score_gpt":0.22847847636104873,"score_spread":0.19595696256037548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070180465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991357,0.000117437165,0.00010280122,0.00005497659,0.0000035542316,0.0000026017005,0.00016102476,0.0000035915384,0.0004182588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993298,0.00008272085,0.00016408888,0.000025009771,0.000003314342,0.00000173468,0.00019473738,0.0000039062807,0.00019471103],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994178,0.00015543868,0.000038162645,0.00010557121,0.00012650207,0.00015656087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720913,0.0009614341,0.0005624792,0.00015648476,0.00045720823,0.00065324915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014744954,0.00038939167,0.0004258992,0.00077399873,0.001225411,0.0012494267,0.00073775434,0.000593086,0.0013258772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036410082,0.0003117004,0.0005417771,0.0009891607,0.0008463645,0.0007401289,0.00046127135,0.0005091536,0.00018982436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054559092,0.000023736971,0.9969214,0.000005580982,0.0001402765,0.000019628726,0.00013904013,0.0003457248,0.00020487943,0.000016959972,0.00011045104,0.0020178321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036464035,0.000015605325,0.998271,0.0000048599127,0.000035690195,0.000017966997,0.00028543346,0.0011846367,0.000027275722,0.00003399164,0.000115503535,0.000004252528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77258235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9447568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22741765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017348537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021896919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45751387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071318671","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.03.014","title":"Use of provisioning ecosystem services drives loss of functional traits across land use intensification gradients in tropical forests in Madagascar","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Provisioning; Ecosystem; Tropical forest; Agroforestry; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Land use; Biodiversity; Geography; Environmental science; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05364966561224094,"score_gpt":0.22358015185849214,"score_spread":0.1699304862462512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071318671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999819,0.000022315357,0.000016219925,0.000009770757,4.6755702e-7,0.0000011246507,0.000027168238,8.248847e-7,0.0001031046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998504,0.000014532723,0.000033008622,0.000005320406,9.0456774e-7,0.000002283014,0.000047673326,4.6735147e-7,0.00004528646],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998672,0.000035921243,0.0000088782435,0.000037838858,0.000015988553,0.00003420569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996207,0.0000872124,0.00015781542,0.000023091581,0.000032128075,0.0000790109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016164118,0.000176165,0.00014500735,0.0005621079,0.0004815485,0.00058539957,0.00018227863,0.0001431367,0.00122025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000620328,0.000112423586,0.00016257836,0.0005930083,0.00046208614,0.0002265309,0.0005371164,0.00024712423,0.00007327098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029342968,0.000015073556,0.9955231,0.00000816382,0.00002546426,0.00009051995,0.00091125997,0.000055042943,0.0013488744,0.000026353737,0.00005225759,0.001914582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.361077e-7,0.000006486092,0.99940324,0.0000016381089,0.0000025737986,0.00002288445,0.00039759895,0.000089276145,0.000020215593,0.000007206944,0.000047615897,8.8138984e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014656738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029465748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014656738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024098385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016949947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029142857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071568548","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00079-9","title":"Birds on organic and conventional farms in Ontario: partitioning effects of habitat and practices on species composition and abundance","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Detrended correspondence analysis; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Species richness; Canonical correspondence analysis; Ecology; Population; Geography; Relative species abundance; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.031427135961817176,"score_gpt":0.25589127060069056,"score_spread":0.22446413463887338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071568548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99919516,0.0000562906,0.000022291844,0.000040180843,0.000001578903,0.000006629469,0.00017260374,0.0000011238055,0.0005042581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997607,0.00009500113,0.000104546896,0.00003611649,0.0000020396544,0.000007830354,0.0002078858,0.000002309918,0.001937329],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961203,0.00004933425,0.000015348707,0.00006609337,0.00009717848,0.00015996677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886,0.00010745234,0.00029803702,0.00003160612,0.00026226556,0.0004405392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029332054,0.00019054791,0.00027614422,0.00063761586,0.0022565124,0.00068735477,0.00049388834,0.00028168768,0.0015784642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008714027,0.00035770683,0.00025032228,0.0013357309,0.0013785062,0.00045938935,0.0006931257,0.00027798855,0.0002315018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043202357,0.000054469463,0.98334783,0.000038295595,0.000045900313,0.0002476201,0.008694696,0.00008971055,0.0018474194,0.00009769093,0.00049443956,0.0046097743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036629644,0.000018245508,0.99653935,0.000004240171,0.0000051861816,0.000023335402,0.0030836638,0.000044430828,0.000029701227,0.000010405489,0.00023515924,0.0000025201057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96198034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038019657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01107074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066586947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08032423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072921567","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.09.002","title":"Combining human preference and biodiversity priorities for marine protected area site selection in Sabah, Malaysia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Marine protected area; Preference; Selection (genetic algorithm); Site selection; Geography; Biodiversity conservation; Marine biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Computer science; Habitat","score_opus":0.06613842253323379,"score_gpt":0.21804244606556833,"score_spread":0.15190402353233454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072921567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997472,0.000023291068,0.000017366123,0.000023190154,8.063795e-7,9.886631e-7,0.000017048855,2.9141583e-7,0.00016976842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99982697,0.000017077504,0.000032830783,0.0000043744035,5.29798e-7,0.0000011284781,0.000012496958,2.5474327e-7,0.00010442471],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944,0.00027925175,0.00004302191,0.000045813493,0.000050390707,0.0001414441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985948,0.00039379342,0.00044711542,0.0000502362,0.00013440313,0.00037964963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009724804,0.00021390143,0.00015529923,0.0008738884,0.0005088419,0.000744936,0.00042311606,0.0002820042,0.0016022293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001665583,0.00020812545,0.0002822089,0.000945433,0.0005731251,0.00038906457,0.00066058536,0.00038480715,0.00017248931],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006881881,0.000039809445,0.9956878,0.000009061511,0.00003536416,0.00006594355,0.0005687968,0.00016568456,0.00008733993,0.00005452828,0.00006179582,0.0031549372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042649053,0.000108354914,0.9914772,0.000017519762,0.000026635917,0.00017295706,0.0065512666,0.0012037109,0.0001137658,0.0001049653,0.00020966721,0.0000097431475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03867731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13220166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03867731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010327027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010562137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07690436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073843668","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2005.03.024","title":"The influence of disturbance and habitat on the presence of non-native plant species along transport corridors","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":423,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Grassland; Transect; Native plant; Ecology; Introduced species; Disturbance (geology); Invasive species; Wildlife corridor; Belt transect; Plant community; Geography; Biology; Species richness","score_opus":0.022615989565879974,"score_gpt":0.2237641837441613,"score_spread":0.2011481941782813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073843668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994129,0.00004570084,0.000028324685,0.000017304526,0.0000016123342,0.0000010838088,0.00003542977,0.000001137014,0.00045658325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99979,0.000022167253,0.0000188027,0.0000049517334,0.000002342929,8.0195895e-7,0.000029155843,0.0000012310943,0.00013055022],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939585,0.00030832412,0.000026813645,0.00007701431,0.000056842713,0.00013514615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99270815,0.0034641065,0.0018948368,0.00034976494,0.00055468164,0.0010284734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071110425,0.00018567931,0.00019704124,0.00065684563,0.00048925844,0.0010322512,0.00037360092,0.00035634503,0.0025691239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046908325,0.00017465121,0.00032550906,0.0005293664,0.0009666156,0.00046231397,0.00054330705,0.0004215528,0.00021537406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004978684,0.00007569182,0.9935927,0.00001273953,0.00014512076,0.00020769499,0.00020241083,0.00058997585,0.0018455765,0.0000778545,0.00009761157,0.0026547813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021890226,0.000038900464,0.9992884,0.0000018327928,0.000016586706,0.00007135429,0.00019876061,0.0002486321,0.000057352998,0.000022219525,0.00005147585,0.0000022819463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019526249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05999788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019526249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054000516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031695925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038825154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075584929","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.03.010","title":"Emerging trends for biobanking amphibian genetic resources: The hope, reality and challenges for the next decade","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Aquaculture disease management and microbiota","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Genomics; University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Wollongong; NSW Environmental Trust; Leverhulme Trust; Memphis Zoo; World Wildlife Fund; Morris Animal Foundation; Australian Research Council; Institute of Museum and Library Services","keywords":"Threatened species; Biobank; Endangered species; Biology; Amphibian; Conservation biology; Biodiversity; Captive breeding; Ecology; Population; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental ethics; Evolutionary biology; Geography; Bioinformatics; Habitat; Sociology","score_opus":0.10680634739502122,"score_gpt":0.27988631370480826,"score_spread":0.17307996630978706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075584929","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031850375,0.28961894,0.02807257,0.63529843,0.0049221064,0.00016020272,0.0014439217,0.0005097327,0.008123727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26194876,0.40674105,0.17292967,0.12578042,0.013942366,0.00069760793,0.0070222775,0.00017642825,0.010761521],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99462575,0.0017749143,0.0006020556,0.0006821468,0.0015174396,0.0007976648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9309201,0.02828654,0.008104774,0.002588329,0.013488526,0.016611746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03670981,0.000917727,0.001661548,0.0019027286,0.002267074,0.009799414,0.003644894,0.008238427,0.018471237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024729785,0.00043447618,0.0011239664,0.002610268,0.006474366,0.016232893,0.0053380076,0.006762422,0.002637716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014553221,0.0009299962,0.05575783,0.0098926565,0.00037396836,0.00095058884,0.0023454523,0.0047261994,0.021597598,0.06275592,0.17417338,0.665041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017989814,0.0013743197,0.04732543,0.006196802,0.00039341062,0.0027417333,0.0222484,0.0073792185,0.0034033512,0.13671899,0.771678,0.00036044832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006446007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015151904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03670981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038369335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018921264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1941424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081767525","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.033","title":"Browsing down our natural heritage: Deer impacts on vegetation structure and songbird populations across an island archipelago","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Burke Museum, University of Washington; Washington State University","keywords":"Ecology; Archipelago; Herbivore; Vegetation (pathology); Understory; Geography; Songbird; Woodland; Biological dispersal; Predation; Biology; Population; Canopy","score_opus":0.02855781367390778,"score_gpt":0.28568214272805575,"score_spread":0.25712432905414795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081767525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99983823,0.000015090561,0.0000057007232,0.000011602732,3.8634153e-7,5.638465e-7,0.000028731172,3.3471156e-7,0.000099396355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99968004,0.00003633059,0.000028829903,0.000014646598,0.0000011859394,0.0000021300607,0.00006132054,6.457465e-7,0.00017491616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999008,0.000026867136,0.000006410893,0.000024380588,0.000012539249,0.000028947363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962485,0.00006013071,0.000079039724,0.000026105432,0.000053701537,0.00015615099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020899584,0.00016849491,0.0001806472,0.0005336735,0.0008056328,0.00067065854,0.00037251107,0.0003700113,0.0016939306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006008925,0.00020109848,0.00018464666,0.0007368343,0.0006387883,0.00048909546,0.00072510383,0.00043181854,0.00010470161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016279481,0.00006982001,0.9934097,0.00001451881,0.00009432513,0.00019315776,0.0012563312,0.00012929963,0.0021440636,0.000036949667,0.000102839505,0.0023862212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011427228,0.000010196543,0.99895906,0.0000017508897,0.00001080284,0.000042209685,0.0008450443,0.00004410853,0.000026622889,0.000008611666,0.00004924394,0.0000011298805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10193716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35059625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10193716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005685195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037985176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20268768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082698400","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.023","title":"Capacity of older plantations to host bird assemblages of naturally-regenerated conifer forests: A test at stand and landscape levels","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; New Brunswick Innovation Foundation","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Snag; Species richness; Generalist and specialist species; Canopy; Biodiversity; Taiga; Geography; Coarse woody debris; Old-growth forest; Forestry; Agroforestry; Biology","score_opus":0.031206909633034498,"score_gpt":0.2369393530871258,"score_spread":0.2057324434540913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082698400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999393,0.000028819864,0.000072098774,0.000014287415,0.0000016608951,0.0000023635791,0.00004634595,0.0000018823781,0.00043956365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99954575,0.000011080976,0.000071170325,0.000017393648,0.0000054277043,0.0000042218226,0.00009308139,0.000003557973,0.00024835294],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843055,0.0005222869,0.00010430781,0.0005442705,0.00018553817,0.00021302467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96773124,0.016936947,0.0054248595,0.0048972843,0.0011690806,0.0038406155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042463387,0.0003409638,0.00041004232,0.0007459032,0.0007466179,0.0013788424,0.0016633217,0.0009392004,0.00491403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011155001,0.00033319808,0.0006915695,0.00029438123,0.0019471295,0.0019265108,0.0013824123,0.0007185154,0.00037866604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010167444,0.0003348532,0.9860896,0.00002330568,0.00023452577,0.00010808127,0.0007784992,0.00051320536,0.0062917927,0.0001764778,0.000071863054,0.004361083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009435956,0.00027653752,0.99812776,0.0000037225855,0.000026172349,0.00011144394,0.0003234911,0.00060044805,0.0002809047,0.00013951806,0.00009363209,0.000006868033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038305053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007965419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00491403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041622936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002951819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022457063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084033836","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.04.002","title":"Hindsight in marine protected area selection: A comparison of ecological representation arising from opportunistic and systematic approaches","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Michigan State University; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Marine protected area; Protected area; Marine reserve; Site selection; Environmental resource management; Marine conservation; Selection (genetic algorithm); Geography; Computer science; Ecology; Environmental science; Habitat; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.2700543091895579,"score_gpt":0.2689001087033072,"score_spread":0.0011542004862507005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084033836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9469136,0.0007759459,0.012059475,0.0018537976,0.0000844658,0.00016710421,0.000112290574,0.00003300484,0.038000476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99658185,0.00015526183,0.001897832,0.00025989194,0.00003291647,0.00003512046,0.0000501577,0.000011061065,0.00097592955],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97324115,0.01822659,0.0010825149,0.0018089043,0.0043754997,0.0012653612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85869193,0.09837484,0.018784646,0.011093545,0.008492796,0.004562244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034149084,0.0003040939,0.00052898057,0.0029954154,0.0019947211,0.0029404545,0.0010919382,0.0008954667,0.006098342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14334013,0.00029544852,0.00043294317,0.0022472346,0.004811972,0.002104379,0.0035622637,0.000776074,0.0002761982],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022288777,0.0002568131,0.6224327,0.0005679056,0.0004304427,0.0002719633,0.040834226,0.0021212837,0.0029965306,0.040837407,0.0030102837,0.28401148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019645455,0.00065348536,0.8852462,0.0004634696,0.0001844223,0.0006144632,0.031807784,0.006442053,0.00096106203,0.062253367,0.011103844,0.00007340754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061332737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020985378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034149084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016625458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027514673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18059975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087296430","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.023","title":"Forest loss with urbanization predicts bird extirpations in Vancouver","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Geography; Ecology; Urbanization; Habitat; Wildlife; Old-growth forest; Biodiversity; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.01583524214483826,"score_gpt":0.20351850887752992,"score_spread":0.18768326673269167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087296430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99897134,0.00006475722,0.00002396687,0.00009740541,0.000006059069,0.000002621315,0.00018838249,0.0000032990406,0.0006421828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982658,0.000065683416,0.000024733537,0.000018588324,0.000003943141,0.0000030136096,0.00022897427,0.0000036486038,0.0013857213],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996736,0.000059003632,0.00001849192,0.000057795223,0.00006931281,0.00012179705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708813,0.00045952538,0.00059614325,0.00016213919,0.0005367983,0.0011572948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042995805,0.00023013054,0.00021807109,0.00061712856,0.001151666,0.0013199898,0.00070749334,0.00073694176,0.0041631195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019376572,0.00037269917,0.0005169427,0.0007878326,0.0004726825,0.00035051492,0.0007739449,0.00100023,0.00062010955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008437186,0.000034566096,0.99833447,0.0000022579552,0.000027748716,0.000030758885,0.00012351801,0.00014013694,0.000070718546,0.000016546712,0.00024165623,0.0008932839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028177972,0.0000141649425,0.9985545,0.000004361015,0.000011974443,0.000046854042,0.00058625307,0.0005509681,0.000023568884,0.000019318151,0.00018208775,0.0000030520055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7772989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92522746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22270107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027969661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021907266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44802517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089641749","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.020","title":"Frugal conservation: What does it take to detect changes in fish populations?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"International Development Research Centre; John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation","keywords":"Transect; Species richness; Sampling (signal processing); Ecology; Geography; Coral reef fish; Coral reef; Belt transect; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Resource (disambiguation); Abundance (ecology); Biology","score_opus":0.06297932502043155,"score_gpt":0.26660689185276204,"score_spread":0.2036275668323305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089641749","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2114049,0.17743956,0.013024774,0.55946594,0.009373673,0.0002510242,0.00060092023,0.0002712899,0.0281679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8918665,0.033278536,0.01379254,0.049986452,0.0057804375,0.00026858083,0.00019450617,0.000072845694,0.004759556],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99343985,0.0027800128,0.00042732767,0.00071199756,0.0019908738,0.00065003743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9657403,0.0140695395,0.005989393,0.0021691048,0.008419006,0.003612619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028158808,0.00090691564,0.0021506248,0.0013796667,0.0020582948,0.004310251,0.003229719,0.00694945,0.0036029129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052542727,0.00039821156,0.0008702074,0.0010074966,0.0074607027,0.0070880274,0.001148215,0.0030741976,0.0006225084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005426245,0.0006551502,0.44588462,0.0023805124,0.0010326485,0.00050110894,0.0017457983,0.000955811,0.0018168871,0.0071259784,0.062126506,0.47523227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023011494,0.0021738913,0.8371094,0.0070698387,0.001749167,0.00222881,0.019547155,0.0055112597,0.0017808387,0.026595673,0.09562983,0.00037395107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052821003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.118110605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052821003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042406023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00462764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14891982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090030429","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.026","title":"Erratum to “Specialised woodpeckers and naturalness in hemiboreal forests – deriving quantitative targets for conservation planning” [Biological Conservation 141 (2008) 997–1012]","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalness; Nature Conservation; Geography; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Physics; Particle physics","score_opus":0.08391167312991737,"score_gpt":0.27753592745667965,"score_spread":0.19362425432676228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090030429","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003104534,0.0012510014,0.0007043544,0.04427288,0.93562114,0.00006328718,0.0028795898,0.00036866165,0.014528627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007868463,0.0074201226,0.0063095763,0.1272776,0.20151198,0.00046975774,0.0097288145,0.0014226262,0.63799113],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779785,0.0002886078,0.00051829795,0.00031532926,0.0008660633,0.00021395907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842869,0.003256083,0.00073568843,0.00093197013,0.010196641,0.00059274014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00274068,0.0026827904,0.0025961318,0.0036870241,0.0043565044,0.0028665904,0.0034164444,0.00698337,0.055320915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023948066,0.0015366055,0.0014944958,0.002096204,0.0014416642,0.0021641192,0.0016187193,0.007955663,0.03812447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020790674,0.000007413306,0.000046079476,0.000045916204,0.0000031570341,0.000053697506,0.000008451579,0.00003107945,0.000027070391,0.00025121178,0.9959825,0.0035226233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045679666,0.000042913955,0.0022732473,0.00029277633,0.00003316953,0.00019039403,0.00008531619,0.00024377907,0.0002769834,0.0009383636,0.99553645,0.00004093785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04172865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05330868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055320915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030451978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004871093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18506694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093370829","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.11.019","title":"Effects of tourism-related provisioning on the trophic signatures and movement patterns of an apex predator, the Caribbean reef shark","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Abbott Laboratories","keywords":"Carcharhinus; Apex predator; Trophic level; Ecology; Population; Reef; Fishery; Biology; Coral reef fish; Marine reserve; Coral reef; Marine protected area; Geography; Habitat","score_opus":0.008228380379361395,"score_gpt":0.2081271819140511,"score_spread":0.19989880153468972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093370829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99986935,0.000008194803,0.000003292899,0.000011413251,8.017985e-7,3.1814113e-7,0.0000109955345,3.1942835e-7,0.00009524381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99981457,0.000011474319,0.000017114891,0.000014631172,0.000001034674,0.0000012583597,0.000026892425,8.8674653e-7,0.000112181675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992347,0.000024572812,0.0000044032136,0.000013910781,0.000007179379,0.000026433747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992976,0.00018351167,0.00015941885,0.00003549234,0.000041057105,0.00028289878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020522652,0.0001616751,0.00012861837,0.00020819055,0.00039126052,0.00042450972,0.00015642933,0.00037650275,0.0019176434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010545669,0.00013512916,0.00016936197,0.00017237832,0.00048049,0.00017102227,0.00040140623,0.000371554,0.00011122358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00664727,0.00065829285,0.93442404,0.000055229044,0.00021265958,0.00085073855,0.00069539197,0.0007507426,0.045391265,0.00016010908,0.00045007523,0.009704191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009234193,0.0002046443,0.9989894,0.000001471294,0.000016581524,0.000049422622,0.00029241206,0.00020066103,0.00017199086,0.00001906248,0.000041981973,0.0000031195957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011015716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04396279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011015716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038127755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003470691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021903217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094838438","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2004.12.004","title":"Dynamics of threatened goldenseal populations and implications for recovery","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Parks Canada","funders":"University of Ottawa; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Threatened species; Population; Biological dispersal; Perennial plant; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Seed dispersal; Vital rates; Population size; Woodland caribou; Range (aeronautics); Population growth; Demography","score_opus":0.0636559892076516,"score_gpt":0.29158514007298614,"score_spread":0.22792915086533455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094838438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99837744,0.00025836015,0.000090379355,0.00016165407,0.000001778366,0.0000016739502,0.00007296132,0.000002067802,0.0010336788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99942243,0.00013253912,0.000065220345,0.000011638404,0.0000025263387,0.000002007968,0.000048051224,0.0000010107392,0.00031461642],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977094,0.000059194812,0.00001783038,0.00005352515,0.000039417282,0.000059050584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987312,0.00026268378,0.0005622801,0.000059005433,0.00017612155,0.00020867854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008719732,0.00010361048,0.00018541464,0.000986973,0.0007510172,0.0008116091,0.0004174483,0.00030048483,0.0031811572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030198123,0.000108508815,0.0000942919,0.00053927116,0.0014437091,0.0010294557,0.0006546208,0.000249358,0.00015935027],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050621276,0.000090683556,0.94873923,0.000069292975,0.000055469864,0.00042108513,0.005097648,0.0012422829,0.0061213677,0.006222517,0.0009286842,0.030505477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012006582,0.00015127822,0.9915017,0.000027882801,0.00001722199,0.0004910817,0.003569712,0.0010070021,0.00030980952,0.001805624,0.001097275,0.00000938976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012568381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034664214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012568381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014045936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004692705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02499044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095043715","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.029","title":"Effectiveness of above-ground pipeline mitigation for moose (Alces alces) and other large mammals","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Shell Canada","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Pipeline (software); Environmental science; Habitat; Geology; Ecology; Biology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03270816617505556,"score_gpt":0.25781978250008575,"score_spread":0.22511161632503018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095043715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973374,0.0000832613,0.00026293207,0.00007776268,0.0000075802786,0.00001116075,0.00003369991,0.000013538899,0.0021726473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921274,0.000031863372,0.00017839171,0.000015171554,0.0000018128773,0.0000033480967,0.00003098174,8.3077106e-7,0.0005247814],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997638,0.00007568674,0.0000074401873,0.000030590618,0.000042762844,0.00007977806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994554,0.00017691158,0.00013766553,0.000038267877,0.00008024983,0.00011150578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039258573,0.00024747272,0.00018717833,0.0001842745,0.00038340947,0.00023203195,0.0003328396,0.00059985934,0.002421544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010142863,0.00006206973,0.00031447093,0.000155065,0.0002074192,0.0005234493,0.0003090877,0.00020665466,0.0001486843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023991043,0.013975923,0.27346158,0.0012757392,0.0013336401,0.0006414718,0.0013796431,0.094901346,0.12399213,0.0056321356,0.004431418,0.4549839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076834304,0.04855051,0.8212443,0.0001715918,0.0015957132,0.00049824495,0.0028287726,0.06585457,0.044997368,0.005272414,0.008150289,0.00006786442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01291992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0317737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01291992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005165748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096648996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025689483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095774070","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2007.03.018","title":"Constraints and reinforcement on adaptation under climate change: Selection of genetically correlated traits","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Population; Trait; Environmental change; Lag; Selection (genetic algorithm); Extinction (optical mineralogy); Frequency-dependent selection; Ecology; Genetic load; Adaptation (eye); Environmental gradient; Population size; Biology; Evolutionary biology; Habitat; Computer science; Demography","score_opus":0.10273070186004059,"score_gpt":0.26852816749157893,"score_spread":0.16579746563153835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095774070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99854434,0.000038750804,0.00048706593,0.00006624099,0.0000033456465,0.0000025446027,0.0000107155065,0.0000051352504,0.00084185903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993462,0.000038373473,0.00034138962,0.0000615796,0.000011410326,0.0000047321446,0.000021685253,0.0000116046895,0.00016292145],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891555,0.0005968389,0.000039278904,0.00015733844,0.00015709254,0.00013393915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99483067,0.0021822734,0.0012403644,0.0006516917,0.00033128014,0.00076379447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022641034,0.0005199314,0.00061833614,0.00068340986,0.00071858836,0.0010585514,0.0006792714,0.0009117186,0.002080026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059923776,0.00029818722,0.000227104,0.0005508119,0.0017553513,0.0004274625,0.0013197825,0.0009829918,0.00012020168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025344805,0.0009668936,0.7651776,0.00014532596,0.0010736733,0.0013893052,0.0011904853,0.02050029,0.14651692,0.011580273,0.000779808,0.04814488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008043133,0.00040751812,0.97813976,0.000009753352,0.00013206629,0.00038285195,0.0003283149,0.013174156,0.001719542,0.005172868,0.000410452,0.00004230962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016128063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061043077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022641034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005837932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004762087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011973858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096787453","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00145-3","title":"Integrity and isolation of Costa Rica's national parks and biological reserves: examining the dynamics of land-cover change","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":246,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Protected area; Deforestation (computer science); Nature reserve; Geography; Forest cover; National park; Buffer zone; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Agroforestry; Ecology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.15870309509791317,"score_gpt":0.24929655615547078,"score_spread":0.09059346105755761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096787453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99789715,0.00018610145,0.00005850533,0.0002859234,0.0000016345674,0.0000044385733,0.00010860607,0.0000013245541,0.0014562685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996649,0.000055410273,0.00003301449,0.000021316855,0.0000022930742,0.0000025040247,0.000070178685,0.0000012311856,0.00014914988],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994746,0.00015654454,0.00003840755,0.00007972419,0.00009161578,0.00015915313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955113,0.00075114024,0.0020572552,0.00042129605,0.0007685905,0.0004905623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011579274,0.00011745214,0.00026675928,0.00096748816,0.0009048829,0.001349424,0.0007501803,0.00045529637,0.0011404369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065397886,0.00013835088,0.00016835456,0.0013561532,0.0014857826,0.0012469592,0.0017607622,0.00052777387,0.00009027247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066909226,0.000027193131,0.9889026,0.000016917496,0.000063768195,0.000068784095,0.002200709,0.0003579459,0.0002788419,0.00048611584,0.00024472186,0.0072853705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.6601583e-7,0.000005428026,0.99817324,0.0000054922825,0.0000066274592,0.000021661495,0.001137802,0.00022614156,0.000026162634,0.00006424923,0.00033112103,0.0000012456237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122054264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30953547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122054264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018462199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013310474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2426877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097606878","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.048","title":"Patterns of gastrointestinal bacterial exchange between chimpanzees and humans involved in research and tourism in western Uganda","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Morris Animal Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Antibiotic resistance; Transmission (telecommunications); Zoology; Antibiotics; National park; Bacteria; Ecology; Microbiology; Genetics","score_opus":0.23451604995907335,"score_gpt":0.39452834346282845,"score_spread":0.1600122935037551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097606878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998246,0.000033731667,0.000008030876,0.000010578347,3.5981734e-7,8.148671e-7,0.000008687498,2.944576e-7,0.00011303129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998012,0.00003453161,0.000041108087,0.000008413257,8.091903e-7,0.000002449327,0.000014407895,4.915857e-7,0.00009649347],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969316,0.00013284892,0.000021958705,0.000046256264,0.000022036997,0.00008380227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925417,0.00014949494,0.0003259483,0.000037882543,0.000060806975,0.00017173777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029658616,0.00020211344,0.00019029934,0.0010649166,0.001136601,0.00075563276,0.00035648976,0.00066035433,0.0016944993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019050799,0.0003299397,0.00015900073,0.0007007318,0.0010415259,0.0006768568,0.0014078122,0.00058223814,0.00020192256],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040676366,0.000087515116,0.98006505,0.000029685241,0.000040138817,0.00031849393,0.012838649,0.000044016568,0.0022286505,0.00015989471,0.00008777724,0.0036933192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003166715,0.00009411268,0.98723185,0.000011424832,0.000008269363,0.00037427785,0.011923982,0.000076022545,0.00009395924,0.00004687787,0.00013083783,0.0000051080588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075691594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017729852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075691594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040374894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017118084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015050232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099102379","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2012.10.014","title":"The genetic legacy of Lonesome George survives: Giant tortoises with Pinta Island ancestry identified in Galápagos","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Park Service; National Geographic Society; Yale University","keywords":"Tortoise; Archipelago; Biology; Hybrid; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Zoology; Purebred; Ecology; Geography; Breed; Paleontology","score_opus":0.09821351497354902,"score_gpt":0.3337638058434403,"score_spread":0.23555029086989127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099102379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998273,0.00001635654,0.000010448337,0.000012138328,6.317995e-7,6.182255e-7,0.000024253572,3.6338716e-7,0.00010802763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99974936,0.00003724023,0.000041092393,0.000014009078,0.0000020341054,0.000001704594,0.00006525102,0.0000010373849,0.00008827527],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999913,0.00001783623,0.00000360405,0.00003351307,0.000010706519,0.000021332802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973315,0.000027948729,0.000098872384,0.000023964089,0.000023863675,0.000092217044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014236926,0.00024256195,0.00016469347,0.0009183353,0.0006144737,0.00050908927,0.0003598716,0.00030867365,0.00119501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043064126,0.00013203896,0.00008329413,0.0008220217,0.0008742827,0.00029916907,0.0008473926,0.00035715665,0.0000900467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012261012,0.00003231331,0.9817739,0.00001566359,0.000058382968,0.0006007412,0.0042944322,0.00004285368,0.008133038,0.00012971481,0.00009950617,0.0046968395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012413736,0.0000193761,0.9971801,0.000004083075,0.000009042868,0.00038670062,0.0021291578,0.000028761675,0.00004325754,0.00004443354,0.00015132125,0.0000025618772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00823902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033225194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00823902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002281712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014735124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016382158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103807119","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.03.020","title":"Rockfish (Sebastes) that are evolutionarily isolated are also large, morphologically distinctive and vulnerable to overfishing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Overfishing; Biology; Sebastes; Rockfish; Ecology; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Zoology; Fishery; Fishing; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.029118040762624923,"score_gpt":0.24469914247403282,"score_spread":0.2155811017114079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103807119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99941826,0.000048923288,0.00005655168,0.000017633172,0.0000016127904,0.0000024680387,0.000018544923,0.0000058639316,0.00043012566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894935,0.000047800462,0.00019303715,0.000038765116,0.0000040831524,0.00000702619,0.00010576615,0.0000050863846,0.00064907066],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998011,0.000016397498,0.000017718598,0.000059659575,0.00004782042,0.000057281548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992692,0.00006085035,0.00039843892,0.000065574364,0.00008116874,0.00012479218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019214302,0.00042653506,0.00047137745,0.0009989081,0.0008114939,0.00062543905,0.0004033708,0.00047588337,0.0017124516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005646069,0.00022690941,0.00026861267,0.0004612355,0.0013491195,0.00048734492,0.0014822722,0.0004288911,0.00039375926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011549545,0.00019625624,0.5185822,0.00012834407,0.00022904712,0.0018839565,0.0017197911,0.00039112038,0.45573854,0.0008572059,0.00026899643,0.01884962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001350434,0.0002436264,0.99344146,0.000006960168,0.000034539702,0.0012626703,0.0009304595,0.00008888706,0.003268588,0.00021519832,0.000485036,0.000008872923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047216597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0132035725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047216597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031213157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032111982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009388387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105015789","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2007.02.022","title":"Spatial organization and food habits of jaguars (Panthera onca) in a floodplain forest","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Jaguar; Territoriality; Panthera; Carnivore; Predation; Population; Geography; Ecology; Home range; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Apex predator; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.017842278455883237,"score_gpt":0.21162415078660868,"score_spread":0.19378187233072544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105015789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99986994,0.000007996931,0.00000655714,0.0000045528923,2.1097601e-7,6.0548706e-7,0.000022800768,7.1417196e-7,0.000086614986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99970335,0.000012148936,0.000038692247,0.000006205602,6.2761325e-7,0.000002505698,0.000055103017,8.2625525e-7,0.00018051911],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999068,0.000022329494,0.0000049752703,0.000028077098,0.0000094575635,0.00002838301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996728,0.000052687432,0.00011736703,0.000020059837,0.00003391918,0.00010309994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000928176,0.0001106596,0.00016343042,0.00078624155,0.00059565797,0.0003537551,0.00020001213,0.00021496521,0.0011282718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029458446,0.0001790995,0.00010043511,0.0005181412,0.00065897184,0.0003704198,0.0004745423,0.0001900654,0.00015767243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026384732,0.00016108465,0.9860423,0.000015357698,0.000032411328,0.000190941,0.0017535783,0.00011571398,0.008635507,0.000056651505,0.00012808882,0.002604492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011824789,0.000031058633,0.9991003,8.0123834e-7,0.0000037174104,0.0000479905,0.0006488376,0.00007390998,0.000045060035,0.000011132504,0.00003481412,0.0000013002083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019507611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11126556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019507611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035240955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018543444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03878814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107031970","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.026","title":"Relaxed selection for tick-defense grooming in Père David’s deer?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Vector-borne infectious diseases","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Cegep de Saint Hyacinthe","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Captivity; Biology; Tick infestation; Tick; Population; Predation; Zoology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ecology; Poaching; Wildlife; Demography","score_opus":0.03366244174689214,"score_gpt":0.25763307101054067,"score_spread":0.22397062926364852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107031970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99908555,0.000032396474,0.000057439436,0.00016883902,0.000005230137,0.0000014569428,0.000010579746,0.0000013739153,0.0006372438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995161,0.000013760977,0.000068867455,0.00011409932,0.000007244095,0.0000022331358,0.000014292323,0.0000022629615,0.00026108953],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999318,0.00022570371,0.00002200731,0.0001379031,0.00005782869,0.00023854733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822193,0.0003361248,0.00036011095,0.00019828926,0.00013515809,0.0007484168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009656211,0.00020062199,0.00030426268,0.0004888724,0.00092181476,0.0011004866,0.00053684204,0.000784139,0.005012745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018768848,0.00022105167,0.00015938355,0.0002570763,0.001475733,0.00034851918,0.00053587346,0.0007250724,0.0001897252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010286048,0.00040664518,0.93524665,0.000054881868,0.00023450446,0.0006151061,0.0020135888,0.00039842416,0.04010154,0.0027397266,0.0009706928,0.016189566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017265222,0.00014672444,0.99434894,0.000012660716,0.000028443612,0.0003758611,0.0025805137,0.00046747702,0.0003768055,0.0009789921,0.0006520788,0.000014282296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037434977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018844398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005012745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030583548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045131773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01676935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108271627","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.06.019","title":"Impacts of insect herbivores on rare plant populations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Herbivore; Biology; Insect; Plant tolerance to herbivory; Population; Ecology; Predation; Vital rates; Rare species; Fecundity; Endangered species; Population size; Habitat; Population growth","score_opus":0.38336119202684954,"score_gpt":0.25155402997585213,"score_spread":0.1318071620509974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108271627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974451,0.00010999018,0.000058702055,0.00007847528,0.000002648634,0.0000020980335,0.0000484899,0.0000027391006,0.002251848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991697,0.00012975882,0.000089273584,0.000043052092,0.000004658676,0.0000025742156,0.000042277814,0.0000017722977,0.0005170922],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994956,0.00022933376,0.000016341137,0.00005624645,0.0000722227,0.00013024233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765223,0.0007291436,0.0005186451,0.00014038832,0.00021849947,0.0007411542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008043059,0.00030227518,0.00024566817,0.0008038362,0.0010974554,0.0006971729,0.00034513208,0.00049695146,0.00694372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019842584,0.0001405459,0.00031644385,0.0005091871,0.0008847517,0.0004586015,0.000989725,0.00041063668,0.00024000951],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002013183,0.00048609017,0.90778893,0.00015353343,0.0004265855,0.001143246,0.00080230203,0.0027782747,0.03820076,0.0029942961,0.0007913266,0.042421486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011815853,0.0004248723,0.9960872,0.000009113264,0.00005693466,0.00023405446,0.0007195874,0.00063447305,0.000785675,0.0004944652,0.00053628255,0.000005503746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008237185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034850135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008237185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069846195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039786586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023229122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108627892","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.08.032","title":"Integrating accessibility and intactness into large-area conservation planning in the Canadian boreal forest","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; Natural Resources Canada; University of Victoria; Canadian Forest Service; University of British Columbia","funders":"Nature Conservancy","keywords":"Boreal; Biodiversity; Taiga; Nature reserve; Ecology; Geography; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.04818834345021094,"score_gpt":0.2832179260537468,"score_spread":0.23502958260353585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108627892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90817595,0.0023547718,0.007374902,0.007595793,0.000045983215,0.00020831138,0.0006661042,0.000060835075,0.073517255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949982,0.00032935024,0.0025356326,0.00011217961,0.000005409847,0.000014739114,0.00006390704,0.000007303485,0.0019332849],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988446,0.00022746398,0.0000366595,0.00012898042,0.00030648324,0.0004557537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975038,0.0005571216,0.00023791223,0.000105177474,0.0009027758,0.000693117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016126543,0.00015094518,0.00021527718,0.001630122,0.0038983743,0.0028529805,0.0011402478,0.00049964554,0.0026150232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053045107,0.00017533918,0.00023538772,0.0023768141,0.003877293,0.0016886378,0.0018744003,0.00087972905,0.00004812228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019264269,0.00036953602,0.4192871,0.00030844205,0.00016062264,0.00060665543,0.01031251,0.07422166,0.0014781884,0.11315085,0.014830351,0.36508143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040801,0.00017894614,0.82701385,0.0003181246,0.0001670851,0.00026345375,0.03374732,0.039433178,0.0007213263,0.04522859,0.05272876,0.00015866998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9852031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99731123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03608386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03608386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052308787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26180798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111871000","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2004.02.020","title":"Modelling the spatial distribution of human-caused grizzly bear mortalities in the Central Rockies ecosystem of Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":232,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"AXYS Technologies (Canada); Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; Parks Canada; University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Geography; Ecosystem; Terrain; Vegetation (pathology); Distribution (mathematics); Logistic regression; Spatial distribution; Ecology; Physical geography; Demography; Biology; Ursus; Population; Cartography","score_opus":0.03509389667473245,"score_gpt":0.21567020825177163,"score_spread":0.18057631157703918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111871000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987338,0.000048432405,0.0002546025,0.000118659795,0.0000027534136,0.00000679199,0.000325079,0.000017188464,0.0004926055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986512,0.00004344531,0.0003789149,0.0000140182265,0.000001557744,0.0000047140484,0.00024273805,0.0000066177704,0.0006568382],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975604,0.00003088563,0.000008455136,0.000054751803,0.000025992465,0.00012391314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990816,0.00033239857,0.00011940984,0.00004685924,0.00024074245,0.00017901059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052299193,0.0004428677,0.0003957583,0.0006764279,0.0014226137,0.0014929817,0.0020828291,0.0009602079,0.0019393361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020270408,0.0005722236,0.0007219896,0.0012279827,0.001239097,0.00057687063,0.00069436734,0.0007467025,0.00012158477],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026125333,0.00011522152,0.1942888,0.000031071962,0.00019424329,0.00026118683,0.00035781742,0.79756695,0.0006909244,0.0014656935,0.001287307,0.003479525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005710173,0.00003614574,0.08842118,0.000013739145,0.0000771237,0.000046991972,0.0012127981,0.90863025,0.00025070002,0.0005564824,0.00066203484,0.000035397396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98505026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9855363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017033378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017033378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008702824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12358636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113270774","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2007.09.003","title":"Where can tigers persist in the future? A landscape-scale, density-based population model for the Indian subcontinent","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Minnesota; James S. McDonnell Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Tiger; Panthera; Population; Geography; Wildlife conservation; Ecology; Wildlife; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology; Predation; Demography","score_opus":0.02096425022697257,"score_gpt":0.23091369173932189,"score_spread":0.20994944151234932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113270774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89108527,0.00097206264,0.07708686,0.0076394295,0.00017684555,0.00006156393,0.0016336842,0.00021061982,0.021133702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908544,0.00032692932,0.002763289,0.00016873251,0.000036965746,0.000039363193,0.00020442197,0.000025235919,0.0055806795],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997974,0.000066638146,0.0000075718626,0.00004704681,0.000011368446,0.00007002064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993856,0.00028265503,0.00009672787,0.00004025816,0.00007752027,0.000117209165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008678884,0.00042304286,0.00074462796,0.0007791317,0.0010636031,0.0022323616,0.0034110586,0.0016087351,0.0041772425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028083764,0.00045939462,0.0009101857,0.0012335859,0.0014319441,0.0025404198,0.0010925548,0.0011502096,0.00044515159],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093787414,0.000052328505,0.013551046,0.000034426273,0.00007626745,0.00022286503,0.0004261747,0.93350184,0.00024156796,0.043470267,0.0024694002,0.0058600227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021633658,0.000022530956,0.0026528037,0.000012131749,0.000050925548,0.00007674882,0.0003716807,0.9761928,0.00002301354,0.019623604,0.0009294849,0.000022739418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.101440944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071391724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101440944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020341973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013140442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20170099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113326205","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2003.07.005","title":"Density and population size estimates for North Cascade grizzly bears using DNA hair-sampling techniques","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Threatened species; Population; Geography; Population density; Distance sampling; Population size; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Demography; Ursus; Habitat","score_opus":0.056873615069588,"score_gpt":0.27601298354526466,"score_spread":0.21913936847567667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113326205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984396,0.000048737704,0.0005466175,0.000011491259,0.0000034180848,0.000024073084,0.00020394208,0.00000440846,0.00071767316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961176,0.00006724113,0.0022901231,0.000014964727,0.000008943553,0.00004714884,0.00033860514,0.0000030839578,0.0011123975],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996655,0.000061021656,0.000014387377,0.000106391795,0.000106641586,0.0000459666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923515,0.00021897016,0.00020750528,0.00005716756,0.00018870793,0.00009255286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067408645,0.00022409478,0.00017331229,0.0013120739,0.0008552966,0.00020737531,0.00046685696,0.0002004476,0.0014762959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013240044,0.00022903671,0.00016533623,0.0004944293,0.00046050624,0.0003536437,0.00034534818,0.00023718347,0.00028191123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003402875,0.00010573149,0.958945,0.000030238545,0.000032027823,0.00010881636,0.0018438053,0.00038628525,0.015988199,0.00016489741,0.00042230828,0.021632383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010474079,0.00010314011,0.9970245,0.0000054893103,0.000018166791,0.00014539332,0.00039124617,0.00048099027,0.0013298495,0.000045205696,0.00043819268,0.000007317458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04950229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15319824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04950229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005375771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031836235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09842831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113645250","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.05.016","title":"Protecting the African elephant: A dynamic bioeconomic model of ivory trade","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"African elephant; Tourism; Natural resource economics; Economics; Business; International trade; Wildlife trade; Geography; Ecology; Wildlife; Biology","score_opus":0.048619204758837874,"score_gpt":0.2209492395953301,"score_spread":0.17233003483649223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113645250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75635725,0.0018128697,0.14513953,0.014000457,0.00023409823,0.00011571783,0.0012062313,0.00015670125,0.080977134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744499,0.00074343383,0.0039736144,0.00027310097,0.00006834684,0.00006277118,0.00009625314,0.000031140527,0.020301532],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996717,0.00015029218,0.000008315542,0.00005932722,0.000018611345,0.00009172189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999106,0.000473675,0.00012657543,0.00004917337,0.00004436432,0.0002002606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010377795,0.00082554424,0.0012845118,0.0006695964,0.0010664561,0.0037723407,0.002390024,0.0047595436,0.012849332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033405581,0.00079679524,0.0008805807,0.0009635566,0.0021822616,0.004605483,0.0014841224,0.002095436,0.0006400425],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001967341,0.000112980924,0.0021700098,0.00006731245,0.00006731418,0.00063159433,0.00022258394,0.7420397,0.0007749911,0.2468825,0.0023314732,0.0045027477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010924031,0.00008655014,0.0011947976,0.000038409322,0.0000591113,0.00016535728,0.00028861495,0.873252,0.00008418725,0.12277655,0.0019111693,0.00003407307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016295353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009301977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016295353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020694348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013385224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04298532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114280848","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.07.001","title":"Corrigendum to “Predicting survival, reproduction and abundance of polar bears under climate change” [Biol. Conserv. 143 (2010) 1612–1622]","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Biology; Reproduction; Polar; Climate change; Ecology; Zoology; Geography; Physics; Astronomy","score_opus":0.11111925890350928,"score_gpt":0.2728933814442639,"score_spread":0.16177412254075463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114280848","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012006294,0.0019432547,0.0005361905,0.05160422,0.93522084,0.00008126399,0.0028608365,0.00039675733,0.0072366567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049428074,0.012746075,0.004312145,0.15001833,0.27803293,0.00072422606,0.010242961,0.0012473756,0.53773314],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970919,0.00046752475,0.0005873409,0.00039898691,0.0012306786,0.00022356692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775718,0.0039483663,0.001011501,0.0010061576,0.015544858,0.0009173916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035429432,0.0029514257,0.002475186,0.003819043,0.0028605843,0.0025476955,0.004059129,0.0057365038,0.07736187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025477856,0.0013797751,0.0022920913,0.0027507807,0.001855617,0.002292485,0.002816691,0.0062071485,0.064502135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011018068,0.00000660831,0.000044187756,0.000053802727,0.0000041115477,0.00004442573,0.000005989603,0.000025182659,0.00002358137,0.00011135753,0.99702954,0.0026401472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005630146,0.00004076716,0.0037822414,0.00037575277,0.000039677903,0.00014737828,0.00006768034,0.0003038031,0.0002869008,0.0009184039,0.99392265,0.000058498656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09762383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12026049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09762383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036095234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006191267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25880122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117997267","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.02.018","title":"A review of lead poisoning from ammunition sources in terrestrial birds","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":359,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Ammunition; Lead poisoning; Threatened species; Shot (pellet); Lead (geology); Near-threatened species; Geography; Wildlife; Ecology; Fishery; Habitat; Biology; Medicine; Archaeology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.179232177485843,"score_gpt":0.3569859266056125,"score_spread":0.17775374911976952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117997267","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014129185,0.999027,0.00008921241,0.00013221393,0.00017728035,0.0000044242447,0.000034435245,0.0000049053256,0.00038925748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00031982138,0.99898654,0.00019094857,0.000105424166,0.00011239352,0.0000028136255,0.000029958244,7.059756e-7,0.000251315],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997048,0.000038701604,0.00009202739,0.00005285404,0.00009503118,0.000016643622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999393,0.00025501606,0.00011564945,0.00001134135,0.00018510132,0.000039858554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064468296,0.000992563,0.0023463515,0.005037662,0.0003046287,0.0011281392,0.0010189513,0.0011031842,0.0029643052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092285126,0.00034662368,0.0007054624,0.0058951476,0.00037230886,0.0013220588,0.00055917876,0.0008104707,0.0010844072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010507385,0.00007504407,0.0005741805,0.058786646,0.00026774724,0.0005867794,0.00013035676,0.00023663,0.0018839819,0.0006083618,0.03625996,0.9004852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038362436,0.00024581235,0.005086469,0.018892204,0.00085502915,0.0051628826,0.00028341165,0.00010501023,0.00067954377,0.00082676345,0.96776885,0.00005570975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037062122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00898033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005037662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052626134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015317359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009916604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119541874","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.04.014","title":"Predatory fish invaders: Insights from Indo-Pacific lionfish in the western Atlantic and Caribbean","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine Ecology and Invasive Species","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":251,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Queensland; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Ecology; Predation; Introduced species; Invasive species; Fishery; Biology; Overfishing; Trophic cascade; Habitat; Predator; Geography; Fishing","score_opus":0.029297820991377305,"score_gpt":0.20180729621699206,"score_spread":0.17250947522561474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119541874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945682,0.00037437936,0.000038334834,0.00018314672,0.0000014651695,0.000004317615,0.000046540772,7.9971505e-7,0.004782765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975399,0.0010082031,0.00011253922,0.00010576589,0.0000025998004,0.0000063978723,0.00006571408,0.0000020565292,0.0011567867],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999049,0.00001021767,0.0000035708076,0.000014106396,0.000020335054,0.000046794874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997211,0.000046935806,0.00007843091,0.000012390875,0.00006796017,0.000073158866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002852385,0.0001966786,0.0001653542,0.0007689599,0.0014300531,0.00097345747,0.00033538498,0.0003673874,0.0024626625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085292826,0.00011567124,0.00014918347,0.00086641556,0.000710774,0.0006830426,0.001286265,0.00042565382,0.00011532243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014883644,0.000053549906,0.9325307,0.00011508321,0.00005874972,0.0007477699,0.031043358,0.00023918881,0.0049011568,0.00091204466,0.0005320992,0.028717445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023915245,0.000017274999,0.9739396,0.000043471486,0.000023960825,0.0001263382,0.023173962,0.00017357778,0.00010412237,0.00015617018,0.002231701,0.000007336282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37225473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7501642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37225473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013685954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011255661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74017596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119651215","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.009","title":"Assessing critical habitat: Evaluating the relative contribution of habitats to population persistence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Population; Ecology; Population viability analysis; Habitat destruction; Biology; Geography; Endangered species; Demography","score_opus":0.09759210132118731,"score_gpt":0.35378576903958203,"score_spread":0.2561936677183947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119651215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928161,0.00041154271,0.005525776,0.000086968364,0.000009656416,0.000023070443,0.00022954162,0.00002481971,0.00087250647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967714,0.000101884434,0.002790682,0.00001269972,0.000007850589,0.000013966563,0.00017892994,0.0000059199597,0.00011660462],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864227,0.0006761195,0.00010278829,0.00020172239,0.00027229707,0.000104892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842939,0.01178192,0.0020149772,0.00065445807,0.0006257509,0.00062895776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038115524,0.00061544287,0.0006499209,0.0032785484,0.00046125156,0.0013779616,0.00078690186,0.0009642532,0.00140113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025245493,0.00024200269,0.00065729395,0.0015919124,0.0008785236,0.0019744572,0.0012939335,0.00050268084,0.00015087165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039989175,0.0001317657,0.92963314,0.0000903306,0.00058107387,0.000092771195,0.00016914679,0.016820328,0.0012224696,0.0006572183,0.00024469077,0.049957223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049562903,0.0015305014,0.8724799,0.00006007518,0.0007198157,0.00081308116,0.00087366457,0.11140846,0.0015839511,0.00972704,0.0006810011,0.000072963856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040433086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009588093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040433086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052493194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005342845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020157635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121589741","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2012.05.017","title":"Conservation genomics in perspective: A holistic approach to understanding Canis evolution in North America","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Evolutionary biology; Conservation genetics; Genomics; Endangered species; Population genomics; Genome; Canis; Geography; Ecology; Genetics; Microsatellite","score_opus":0.09146000874589812,"score_gpt":0.2822155564207717,"score_spread":0.19075554767487357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121589741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78138524,0.030498121,0.042200655,0.054563172,0.00024509753,0.0000576277,0.00027855975,0.00012246142,0.09064916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98306733,0.006141733,0.007479198,0.0014492873,0.00008178573,0.000020638698,0.000055283977,0.000014257462,0.001690481],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998312,0.000060009857,0.0000051933876,0.00004209223,0.000030710573,0.000030709256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975294,0.00008127769,0.000045802146,0.00002130676,0.000056302364,0.00004244741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067983544,0.00036519134,0.0004263944,0.0011325188,0.0013887712,0.0020674388,0.0006832471,0.00063598,0.0015020545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092112954,0.00016785412,0.00018505329,0.0012623925,0.0032559095,0.002366876,0.0009538071,0.0010464491,0.00004671345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018809973,0.00017725618,0.17428648,0.0011458618,0.0006177533,0.0017400573,0.04687503,0.017030505,0.03994412,0.2994776,0.0071278545,0.4113893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019910438,0.0001222485,0.46737164,0.00049769925,0.00046067868,0.0009986329,0.06633222,0.011037987,0.0023022513,0.36570263,0.08508158,0.00007251042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06032305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13323171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93967694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037767482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032838741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11994386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121932776","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.019","title":"Contrasting recreational and commercial fishing: Searching for common issues to promote unified conservation of fisheries resources and aquatic environments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":561,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Research Council Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts","keywords":"Fishing; Fishery; Fisheries management; Bycatch; Fisheries law; Recreational fishing; Recreation; Fish stock; Fisheries science; Business; Sustainability; Commercial fishing; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.05403444744815188,"score_gpt":0.2736948205139103,"score_spread":0.21966037306575842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121932776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98316276,0.0012482356,0.001971565,0.0044879867,0.00007110892,0.000020038075,0.000044088494,0.000006829533,0.008987447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99831307,0.0003394142,0.0007390994,0.00028226155,0.000027858528,0.000007263618,0.000024501016,0.000004015577,0.00026256524],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984261,0.000807239,0.000094439674,0.00013907586,0.0003358305,0.00019737844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963915,0.0018514892,0.00060285523,0.00021156984,0.0006391309,0.00030347196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038338895,0.00011744698,0.00035007414,0.0008038844,0.0013664255,0.0027940604,0.0007404213,0.0009156076,0.0022648221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011674432,0.00014774488,0.0001504919,0.001209167,0.002651484,0.0024439564,0.0013326978,0.0008173559,0.0001533356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016406231,0.00064471696,0.61798376,0.000689812,0.00030758997,0.00069298,0.03367521,0.0008595098,0.013480114,0.09634973,0.005801221,0.22787467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004139243,0.00022773526,0.9016143,0.00022203503,0.00010461999,0.0005324475,0.055448264,0.0015208189,0.0015005321,0.032903824,0.005829356,0.000054670745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00465747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022209622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00465747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009628903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009898433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020275772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124671064","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.017","title":"Protection from harvesting restores the natural social structure of eastern wolf packs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Threatened species; National park; Geography; Kinship; Population; Ecology; Protected area; Population density; Demography; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.03416458429634046,"score_gpt":0.23640160002922728,"score_spread":0.20223701573288683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124671064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974033,0.000026835245,0.0001853213,0.00013126442,0.000007543077,0.000004216238,0.00001204847,0.000008395248,0.0022210123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99812645,0.000041719104,0.00025830604,0.0000906743,0.000016665099,0.000005503108,0.00003624346,0.0000046876066,0.0014198009],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983,0.0000416004,0.000008987456,0.000020180432,0.00002157011,0.000077706136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992867,0.00009804745,0.00015662337,0.0001909442,0.00005458448,0.00021312419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053095625,0.00018472731,0.00019234227,0.0003032647,0.00073091104,0.00056774734,0.00034671326,0.00033751028,0.0038572042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010217397,0.00013523472,0.000161018,0.00018530346,0.00051621516,0.00039596323,0.0007841752,0.00026936946,0.0003489602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018312661,0.0021248288,0.6712736,0.0002135173,0.00025912325,0.0018553643,0.0031474635,0.0049376003,0.079810694,0.0057270094,0.006855542,0.22196406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003958364,0.0006704981,0.983284,0.00004302036,0.00006059118,0.0005653615,0.0020097736,0.0013202312,0.0027891968,0.0023682523,0.0068390192,0.000010524491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017657678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010465851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038572042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018637444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003821414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012903631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126037208","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.003","title":"Effectiveness of five small Philippines’ coral reef reserves for fish populations depends on site-specific factors, particularly enforcement history","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Marine reserve; Marine protected area; Fishing; Coral reef; Fishery; Coral reef fish; Nature reserve; Trophic cascade; Ecology; Protected area; Geography; Biology; Predation; Habitat; Predator","score_opus":0.1377762037787545,"score_gpt":0.2733279512056455,"score_spread":0.13555174742689102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126037208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99870276,0.00003445392,0.000047181307,0.000049614497,0.0000011133397,0.000005855187,0.000028139384,0.0000039897236,0.0011267988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993981,0.000025618852,0.000086415814,0.000013588965,0.000001012119,0.000005004119,0.00004414707,0.0000017520401,0.00042433376],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994331,0.00023152436,0.00003419553,0.00008826275,0.00007071728,0.00014207297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98841023,0.0037448932,0.0035833467,0.0008013936,0.001236383,0.00222372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019346311,0.0002079745,0.00019843984,0.00072373275,0.0010482166,0.0008273839,0.00067146047,0.00032114005,0.004429829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063043134,0.0001774713,0.00018926013,0.0003496702,0.0008971077,0.0008241032,0.0011024053,0.00043017927,0.0002464461],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027819985,0.00015534218,0.9767346,0.000034018158,0.00010712596,0.00014005986,0.0010408083,0.00056160055,0.0012137162,0.00029968415,0.00038673906,0.019048167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033265567,0.00010198634,0.99754286,0.000007944883,0.00002230419,0.000040801515,0.0012342054,0.0004969952,0.00020857161,0.00003976466,0.00029700174,0.0000042969928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027648393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.106698915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027648393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008781566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077083247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054974914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126476059","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.011","title":"Patterns of dispersal of hawksbill turtles from the Cuban shelf inform scale of conservation and management","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Wildlife Fund Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Geography; Fishery; National park; Ecology; Biology; Population; Demography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02592473507022344,"score_gpt":0.22428736318411555,"score_spread":0.1983626281138921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126476059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995184,0.000032358716,0.000027242408,0.00002640888,8.1558613e-7,0.0000013517755,0.00004843649,7.2930396e-7,0.0003442277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996872,0.000019354198,0.000052547282,0.000006649251,8.3903313e-7,0.0000020739135,0.00006196764,7.377031e-7,0.0001686297],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991286,0.000021664508,0.000005735986,0.000023247967,0.000010130137,0.000026334807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999343,0.00009206553,0.00027050014,0.000040205643,0.00013888253,0.00011530712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028177255,0.000076651566,0.000099691984,0.0006469347,0.000378761,0.0006662872,0.00016495248,0.00017259477,0.0013020118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009535826,0.00010299953,0.00008413986,0.00033421454,0.00034619748,0.00027653386,0.0005110893,0.0001724546,0.000105985884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069945265,0.000012361718,0.99356174,0.000007670838,0.000027873986,0.000029036371,0.0007562136,0.00015431111,0.0015291686,0.00010079844,0.00019566598,0.0035550755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.2298914e-7,0.0000035688452,0.9992829,0.0000032404125,0.0000024997378,0.000012048609,0.00041035618,0.00014353351,0.000033343797,0.000016489243,0.00009015532,9.671303e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059927683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22636117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059927683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075026037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031923433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11915773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128793450","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.09.023","title":"Do plant traits influence a species’ response to habitat disturbance? A meta-analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Habitat; Biology; Ecology; Species richness; Abundance (ecology); Temperate climate; Herbaceous plant; Pollination; Pollen","score_opus":0.18059673136342147,"score_gpt":0.2481640934086875,"score_spread":0.06756736204526603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128793450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9685865,0.018695759,0.009215537,0.0005861624,0.00042231657,0.000110690315,0.0014722426,0.00020204308,0.0007087515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99596184,0.0008115897,0.0020627507,0.00019980104,0.000055142562,0.00009388407,0.00034237458,0.000049283513,0.00042349668],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.98900396,0.005571589,0.0007581288,0.0033170043,0.000486928,0.0008624784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756537,0.018103112,0.0014928787,0.0032507195,0.0006965692,0.0008030518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01063718,0.0029951148,0.005069773,0.0031370465,0.0018701188,0.0023193494,0.003689076,0.0029396482,0.007542846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01379761,0.0014755335,0.019072762,0.00354648,0.0015518065,0.001814868,0.0022631139,0.002539218,0.0007043422],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006054676,0.00034466226,0.39139798,0.0022878433,0.5851528,0.00073016237,0.0005119404,0.0022822134,0.004391968,0.0004391867,0.00067972403,0.005726917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012206299,0.002520436,0.42672876,0.0006310464,0.54547024,0.0010745514,0.0016800485,0.0153314425,0.0013391667,0.002011973,0.0017873273,0.00020442212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010701267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0153447585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010701267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000839176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009815346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05625546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129038472","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2007.09.023","title":"Links between sex change and fish densities in marine protected areas","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Marine protected area; Marine reserve; Sex change; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Sex ratio; Marine conservation; Fishery; Marine fish; Biology; Ecology; Geography; Demography; Habitat; Population","score_opus":0.08442005219104406,"score_gpt":0.2454645256067444,"score_spread":0.16104447341570033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129038472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999374,0.0001109186,0.000022777853,0.00008319081,0.0000034001055,8.924722e-7,0.000057508754,0.0000012471518,0.00034611556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99972624,0.000048824575,0.000015639436,0.000013566527,0.0000064742067,0.0000012330037,0.000044075936,6.828913e-7,0.00014323146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964154,0.0001608418,0.00002861132,0.000063355066,0.000046722802,0.000058958034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99248004,0.0035991357,0.0024296984,0.0003349824,0.0004215363,0.0007346474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007284255,0.000113077054,0.00017601004,0.0009936459,0.00037843978,0.0005053515,0.00039745038,0.00038992675,0.0034656047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075799343,0.0002018315,0.00027530562,0.00085540046,0.00066399435,0.00054786325,0.00059707154,0.00050876697,0.0001494423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007034522,0.000021133674,0.998359,0.000004066222,0.000049844704,0.000023324188,0.000109208384,0.00009084657,0.00009280345,0.00005782026,0.0000382884,0.0010831814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023138343,0.000018386787,0.9995271,0.0000016035565,0.000011789446,0.000035765755,0.00015743912,0.00012120764,0.000019483983,0.000059905848,0.00004400169,0.0000010949998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0143377455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033798575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0143377455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038664296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002294017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028508604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131652081","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2007.05.020","title":"Assessing the potential for impacts by feral mink on wild mink in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mink; American mink; Mustelidae; Ecology; Population density; Biology; Geography; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.027355986535876637,"score_gpt":0.26284661935592846,"score_spread":0.2354906328200518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131652081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99666303,0.0001666065,0.0000905038,0.00017115838,0.0000045863408,0.000011677749,0.00045772918,0.0000060918587,0.002428684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978998,0.00017343648,0.00021097588,0.00004948977,0.000001600616,0.000005194876,0.00025608696,0.000002708031,0.0014008995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995098,0.000046685513,0.00001174989,0.000044589793,0.00016347814,0.0002235984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924904,0.00006818888,0.00008133161,0.00001625765,0.00037574017,0.00020947502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004474609,0.0003465011,0.00027463134,0.00075645914,0.0021303713,0.0011698863,0.00073875196,0.0005522265,0.0014457563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011604738,0.00018217874,0.00029703949,0.0008704603,0.0006300482,0.00045900085,0.00054737803,0.0004105866,0.00015339644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004668016,0.00009634391,0.97470313,0.000059023627,0.00019588048,0.0005115462,0.00093177793,0.0054377504,0.0022650424,0.00036420426,0.0014619562,0.013506586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001325352,0.00009232031,0.9902362,0.000026468479,0.00007455421,0.00008548009,0.0035165155,0.0035590276,0.0005256697,0.00013436728,0.001720806,0.000015340242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9898206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024527695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024527695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012157398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17796177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134706900","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.09.007","title":"Viability of mountain caribou in British Columbia, Canada: Effects of habitat change and population density","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Vital rates; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Endangered species; Population; Ecology; Habitat; Population decline; Population density; Density dependence; Population size; Population viability analysis; Population growth; Population model; Geography; Mark and recapture; Population projection; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.015746438749639678,"score_gpt":0.1988971412938415,"score_spread":0.18315070254420182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134706900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99829775,0.0004043942,0.000031937005,0.00018294311,0.0000075001526,0.0000037396817,0.0005677362,0.0000032839098,0.00050077296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987839,0.00016066976,0.000033003773,0.00003816806,0.0000032032265,0.0000028233214,0.00034915426,0.0000025807321,0.00062649],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995795,0.000072855546,0.000021099097,0.00008489308,0.00006821318,0.00017354594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817574,0.0002688184,0.00025473363,0.000090822185,0.00069005444,0.0005198494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005774447,0.00022117775,0.00036538235,0.0009000744,0.0019020315,0.0012357909,0.0015219519,0.00077283056,0.0022669327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002483961,0.00031201018,0.0003480306,0.0015986261,0.0017648309,0.0006237169,0.00060379424,0.00076945603,0.00027167812],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022019997,0.000044234293,0.9914635,0.000023639052,0.000109961744,0.00022583285,0.0012301356,0.0006848689,0.00034641213,0.00017556979,0.0009413472,0.0045342655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005446529,0.000011262365,0.99812406,0.000009885686,0.000021240889,0.000053957265,0.001150844,0.00033920567,0.000023267761,0.000031951582,0.0002218072,0.0000070351566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99114764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010118746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010118746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00852991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07341701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138446583","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.07.017","title":"Beaver (Castor canadensis) as a surrogate species for conserving anuran amphibians on boreal streams in Alberta, Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and biodiversity studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Beaver; Castor canadensis; Amphibian; Boreal; Ecology; Habitat; Taiga; Abundance (ecology); STREAMS; Biology","score_opus":0.023109704220018373,"score_gpt":0.19932444643002434,"score_spread":0.17621474221000596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138446583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984895,0.00020012748,0.00012464452,0.000045880093,0.000010897727,0.000031474672,0.000075113756,0.0000057018083,0.0010166079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777824,0.00013979504,0.0009743662,0.000027115058,0.0000023239445,0.000016030399,0.00015922991,0.0000023850139,0.0009005817],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991818,0.00027055017,0.000029859295,0.0000977114,0.0002874956,0.00013250268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998743,0.00012334003,0.00028127065,0.000059950948,0.00047065713,0.00032181997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013569432,0.0003287776,0.0003888586,0.0010844226,0.0026229126,0.0010568942,0.0011443981,0.00037600324,0.00041377163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001605213,0.00017479782,0.00014258691,0.00086711504,0.0009093202,0.00034055856,0.0004885093,0.00042458074,0.000071370814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043854997,0.0017519437,0.8886836,0.00029818524,0.0002558897,0.0011214545,0.003996752,0.0029959106,0.028387351,0.0014310599,0.00406867,0.06262361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012066641,0.0010976419,0.9807072,0.00007802974,0.00023611891,0.00034980144,0.005695822,0.0040904107,0.0033752597,0.00018546694,0.004026868,0.000036634883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8821119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98838764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11788809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076771206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056446376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23716468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140988450","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.01.020","title":"Effects of habitat loss, habitat configuration and matrix composition on declining wetland species","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Wetland; Habitat; Ecology; Habitat destruction; Threatened species; Landscape ecology; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Habitat fragmentation; Environmental science; Fragmentation (computing); Turtle (robot); Biology","score_opus":0.01882434792921067,"score_gpt":0.2332186452139441,"score_spread":0.21439429728473341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140988450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995473,0.00007482907,0.00005068391,0.00003581317,0.0000027181625,0.000002031744,0.00006981524,0.000004379132,0.0002124149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994247,0.00002237657,0.00007333748,0.000028534709,0.000005434359,0.000003359337,0.00009476503,0.0000052564533,0.00034219242],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917823,0.00035428972,0.00005808123,0.00015362786,0.0000659051,0.00018984353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99454343,0.0020854773,0.0011217555,0.00033837178,0.00039275107,0.001518055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015383088,0.00045654498,0.0004977441,0.0007290009,0.00077058095,0.0011834471,0.0008022418,0.0006611188,0.0058506564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048729084,0.00025467135,0.0005666985,0.00051217125,0.0014776784,0.00079404487,0.0009588832,0.0005979716,0.00033146786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0060584256,0.00056025607,0.9768694,0.000039500523,0.00037771568,0.00031808455,0.00019786555,0.0010575573,0.008213874,0.00010895061,0.00026367922,0.0059347553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017686849,0.00045800247,0.99798965,0.0000022753297,0.000065885746,0.00014191083,0.0002055666,0.00072758296,0.00021205899,0.00005658243,0.00011838901,0.0000044330577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011273603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040208902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011273603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090143306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067122886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022415936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141574903","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.05.028","title":"Conservation and the scarecrow effect: Can human activity benefit threatened species by displacing predators?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Earthwatch Institute","keywords":"Mongoose; Threatened species; Predation; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Habitat; Endangered species; Nest (protein structural motif); Biology; Critically endangered","score_opus":0.013802951592910414,"score_gpt":0.22116605611362475,"score_spread":0.20736310452071433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141574903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8501418,0.008958963,0.0011971341,0.05413066,0.0003744787,0.000019299725,0.00016496795,0.000029909335,0.0849828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922442,0.0014982802,0.00018378673,0.003345606,0.0001637134,0.0000047373755,0.000019462788,0.00000539564,0.0025348386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994936,0.00021317278,0.00001194327,0.00008225067,0.000087448316,0.00011161815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970968,0.0011918086,0.0007881442,0.00022559325,0.00022891081,0.00046877086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015222454,0.00036775955,0.00042193293,0.00059249275,0.00080537144,0.0013716663,0.00070562144,0.0028380235,0.022991836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055375984,0.00016411033,0.00033601708,0.0005194957,0.0051527964,0.0025257042,0.0010769017,0.0009747215,0.0005690579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002756657,0.0012917285,0.5770908,0.00070473197,0.0008520267,0.0021605752,0.0023595155,0.004628523,0.0077566113,0.1334731,0.022866586,0.24405922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029434555,0.0008816508,0.8358133,0.0003408521,0.00031513142,0.0015194834,0.007147627,0.0025723455,0.0014664236,0.11845084,0.03111453,0.00008346032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008107067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022682287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022991836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007980023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073423865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07691538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141767450","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.025","title":"Defining protected area boundaries based on vascular-plant species richness using hydrological information derived from archived satellite imagery","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Soil erosion and sediment transport","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Alberta; Western University","funders":"Government of Alberta; Alberta Conservation Association; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Species richness; Biodiversity; Vascular plant; Environmental science; Satellite imagery; Synthetic aperture radar; Range (aeronautics); Remote sensing; Geography; Ecology; Hydrology (agriculture); Geology","score_opus":0.05656964439523683,"score_gpt":0.21417703167409438,"score_spread":0.15760738727885754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141767450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95414466,0.00026295075,0.032277275,0.0000963247,0.00003492924,0.00036544228,0.0007892191,0.00026419724,0.011765044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582282,0.00005031375,0.040109072,0.00001704541,0.0000074720406,0.00016069872,0.0009160866,0.00003218336,0.00047913045],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999353,0.00015201443,0.000075769654,0.00016091978,0.00013353676,0.00012479718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974837,0.0010836237,0.00044052818,0.00018076912,0.0006048304,0.00020662996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015570305,0.00028671738,0.0003720479,0.003982026,0.0009082768,0.0013034702,0.00076193403,0.00040615202,0.0020144572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055090366,0.00020835578,0.0002895203,0.0015340297,0.0005723182,0.0012637904,0.0012367247,0.00036207505,0.00027542296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088154164,0.00059344596,0.6034555,0.0004419142,0.00018437297,0.0005404984,0.004864713,0.04821081,0.01714738,0.01821638,0.007326196,0.29813734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001902371,0.00035809376,0.60220015,0.0003960052,0.00019367108,0.00064193853,0.0060866787,0.3430095,0.011061908,0.016064573,0.019700745,0.000096638425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073033306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022439824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073033306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006387919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079828134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014521658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149189573","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.041","title":"Dynamics and trends of overwintering colonies of the monarch butterfly in Mexico","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Instituto Carlos Slim de la Salud; World Wildlife Fund; David and Lucile Packard Foundation","keywords":"Monarch butterfly; Overwintering; Danaus; Geography; Population; Butterfly; Ecology; Habitat; Nymphalidae; Population decline; Biology; Lepidoptera genitalia; Demography","score_opus":0.055891643246265735,"score_gpt":0.22119902844487901,"score_spread":0.16530738519861327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149189573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998555,0.0003477762,0.000032114676,0.00004778606,0.0000027891429,0.0000032120142,0.00052994397,0.0000064866585,0.00047499547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971277,0.00070296694,0.00023988173,0.000032481836,0.000009818197,0.000012606285,0.0011898166,0.0000030533056,0.00068159687],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992836,0.0000058826795,0.000005789058,0.00002634868,0.00001655599,0.000017010088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960345,0.000025560828,0.00023027486,0.000013684883,0.00007028488,0.000056832185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017777989,0.00015152678,0.00011266044,0.0010931238,0.0003908115,0.00032949555,0.00019448018,0.00017130525,0.00057866203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034316225,0.00013234577,0.00014615731,0.0004827266,0.00014539128,0.00022186503,0.00029464907,0.00017856272,0.000055992143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003275797,0.000012739001,0.99401593,0.000016045768,0.000032001666,0.00005214594,0.0003598446,0.000046053538,0.00057471177,0.00002336347,0.00034352366,0.004490745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.513326e-7,0.0000068921354,0.99937505,0.000005268613,0.000007201876,0.000018466997,0.00013367056,0.000029050201,0.000034941455,0.0000017969439,0.00038590247,8.978608e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11384655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2517618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11384655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081933377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002666835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22636777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152687399","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00103-9","title":"Mitochondrial genetic diversity and population structuring of UK bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): is the NE Scotland population demographically and geographically isolated?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Population; Genetic diversity; Biology; mtDNA control region; Geography; Mitochondrial DNA; Genetic monitoring; Ecology; Zoology; Microsatellite; Haplotype; Demography; Genetics; Allele","score_opus":0.025736554192652708,"score_gpt":0.20924269631001682,"score_spread":0.1835061421173641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152687399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994106,0.00022551979,0.00004874269,0.00006420955,0.0000026713462,8.670475e-7,0.000047148693,6.7210846e-7,0.00019952451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99958295,0.00013699208,0.000054473396,0.000031596584,0.0000070887345,0.0000013398696,0.0000865651,7.639321e-7,0.0000983594],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960166,0.00012647093,0.0000371898,0.000095672156,0.00006144756,0.0000776022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844307,0.00036620782,0.000613264,0.00009015759,0.00024847558,0.00023889486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000830475,0.0001664849,0.00022273487,0.00094700395,0.0004285674,0.0005062548,0.00041006206,0.00033457892,0.00094806927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002124391,0.000199937,0.00023875809,0.0010022636,0.0008591531,0.0006915942,0.0006024302,0.00031819212,0.00010319616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017072208,0.000022744694,0.989416,0.000021464124,0.00009730996,0.00011668868,0.0015978012,0.000100280056,0.0011804098,0.0001056353,0.00013866641,0.0070323176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027680028,0.00003212448,0.9992982,0.000004897943,0.000016770537,0.000057862075,0.0004215839,0.000039885952,0.000015987014,0.000019243877,0.00008875269,0.0000019563495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07263403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13467048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07263403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059583905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036643303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14442253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153741995","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.027","title":"Survival, dispersal and early migration movements of captive-bred juvenile eastern loggerhead shrikes (Lanius ludovicianus migrans)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Shrike; Juvenile; Biology; Ecology; Zoology; Fishery; Population; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.028903383405524192,"score_gpt":0.24405666686495367,"score_spread":0.21515328345942947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153741995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99990094,0.000011152619,0.0000032410906,0.0000023269304,5.0484283e-7,6.603994e-7,0.000021315402,6.286383e-7,0.000059222613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99913067,0.00001676179,0.000027857905,0.000012813761,0.0000019118859,0.0000065564604,0.00014625913,0.0000015855487,0.0006555795],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999255,0.000014475771,0.0000043529194,0.000023437908,0.000008100372,0.000024108127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949026,0.000086708766,0.00016672305,0.000042310745,0.00004074261,0.00017331164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021504925,0.00024546447,0.00013530721,0.00044647304,0.000308626,0.00031346548,0.00033893646,0.0002694419,0.0013597459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005632919,0.00015880028,0.00011196548,0.00017296957,0.00041677372,0.000425151,0.00027064374,0.00033891498,0.00029901564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016418395,0.0006133231,0.9738541,0.000022059396,0.000064744716,0.0003373229,0.0013992155,0.00016612183,0.0157051,0.00004261685,0.00025656458,0.0058969944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073379797,0.00021424911,0.99911815,0.0000013876949,0.000008185101,0.000054430828,0.00027999774,0.000084463056,0.00016945171,0.000006345655,0.000053794072,0.0000021336093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0098752845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037845716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0098752845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037796856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001502112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019635618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160077014","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.08.020","title":"Burning biodiversity: Woody biomass use by commercial and subsistence groups in western Uganda’s forests","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Agroforestry; Subsistence agriculture; Woodland; Biomass (ecology); Charcoal; Biodiversity; Deforestation (computer science); Natural resource; Business; Geography; Environmental protection; Ecology; Agriculture; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.035589685226554285,"score_gpt":0.21282723071414938,"score_spread":0.1772375454875951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160077014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99954385,0.00007276309,0.0000110195915,0.000020722335,8.2064713e-7,0.000001053971,0.000056305948,3.021786e-7,0.00029307534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996184,0.00006457535,0.000035289173,0.000008620038,0.0000015147527,0.0000043507944,0.000055237444,4.0676818e-7,0.00021154594],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998166,0.000062399406,0.000016345215,0.000022100969,0.000017399258,0.00006522933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999539,0.0001288722,0.00017100998,0.00001585313,0.000049337465,0.00009595014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041138844,0.000213634,0.00014581432,0.0011451332,0.0009728266,0.0008320311,0.00034009153,0.00041461323,0.003624016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012577291,0.0002518011,0.00020215622,0.0016724835,0.00060992636,0.0011541508,0.0013132172,0.0003702237,0.0002836853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010759948,0.000031201358,0.9868623,0.000032067455,0.000020142998,0.00023454553,0.0058599073,0.00012971774,0.00042824738,0.00022790543,0.00017737702,0.005888958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015366596,0.0000368354,0.9902508,0.00001819021,0.000013946958,0.0001592368,0.009011165,0.00013497817,0.000067924375,0.0000692121,0.00023332302,0.0000027356327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018360723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060465246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018360723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051929994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031021453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036507726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160457197","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2007.02.018","title":"Heuristic algorithms vs. linear programs for designing efficient conservation reserve networks: Evaluation of solution optimality and processing time","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Heuristic; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Null-move heuristic; Consistent heuristic; Search algorithm; Mathematics; Incremental heuristic search; Beam search","score_opus":0.29048324169723255,"score_gpt":0.2993051758238464,"score_spread":0.008821934126613862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160457197","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17407148,0.0015029402,0.81170934,0.0010567886,0.00013527938,0.00057394063,0.0004065581,0.00090890785,0.009634723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62748927,0.0007731586,0.3677949,0.0002567994,0.00012194568,0.0008022751,0.0003608298,0.00018127811,0.002219536],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832267,0.0010209337,0.00006869174,0.0002076896,0.0001802538,0.00019972591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98031986,0.017974466,0.0007350483,0.0003257107,0.00040541406,0.00023943314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043389797,0.0015134887,0.0015007056,0.001806668,0.0006493296,0.0015494446,0.0011518976,0.0020665112,0.004653815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0131348,0.00090680114,0.00074214104,0.0015976469,0.00101505,0.0018377965,0.0006944276,0.0012612982,0.00040359158],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020518257,0.0001140299,0.00028685026,0.00007636326,0.00003200673,0.000013369967,0.000023082512,0.96835023,0.00016066107,0.0044122115,0.0006051328,0.025720758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007410104,0.0000614427,0.00005479193,0.000008395237,0.000014090183,0.000005614252,0.000015800586,0.9950022,0.0001772403,0.0044386084,0.00014420408,0.0000034117497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00961751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073594204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00961751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001843369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029399265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022947013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164115678","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.023","title":"Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":306,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Population; Life history theory; Reproductive success; Biology; Habitat; Mammal; Geography; Life history; Demography","score_opus":0.24275007928229805,"score_gpt":0.29891970659228884,"score_spread":0.05616962730999078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164115678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9490633,0.02661525,0.01796688,0.0011472898,0.00069082726,0.000159783,0.0026393316,0.0004625896,0.0012548553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937401,0.0009978119,0.0032694943,0.00025877295,0.00011452546,0.00014835146,0.00051333354,0.000088132714,0.0008693618],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868405,0.0075623705,0.00075502245,0.0032565047,0.0004911223,0.0010945026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95804274,0.034268025,0.0016336564,0.004170596,0.00095253316,0.00093252957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015573987,0.0046601654,0.005898258,0.0038173923,0.0021664887,0.0025699108,0.0050212834,0.0032813079,0.013245364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01800801,0.0022210681,0.028475,0.0033695,0.0015300185,0.0022957525,0.0026841967,0.0033156865,0.0012607103],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007968598,0.00036579053,0.2710831,0.0022247538,0.697526,0.00094802864,0.00056253886,0.004905948,0.0033096331,0.0007118517,0.0011394966,0.0092542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001878361,0.0023870491,0.21962145,0.0006963477,0.72919405,0.00091602205,0.0013885013,0.037089527,0.0011583939,0.0037081724,0.0017202355,0.000241898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012091879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01571423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015573987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009953486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00104823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08236414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165609016","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.011","title":"Whooping crane recruitment enhanced by egg removal","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Predation; Biology; Flock; Endangered species; Population; Reproductive success; Ecology; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Zoology; Fishery; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.08137110671381177,"score_gpt":0.29541733048736035,"score_spread":0.2140462237735486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165609016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99865794,0.00009092977,0.00007905716,0.000023553168,0.000008256703,0.0000046058226,0.000018337052,0.0000087453855,0.0011085948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996932,0.00006905109,0.0002498573,0.000053915493,0.00000979125,0.000011573962,0.00006426739,0.0000100859825,0.0025994757],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987376,0.000023862867,0.0000063459015,0.000029706682,0.000016559872,0.0000497592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992417,0.00017371577,0.00016905926,0.00009405052,0.00006241606,0.00025906638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021953497,0.00027975265,0.00038802004,0.0002268205,0.000331033,0.0004135855,0.00024787534,0.00046276808,0.00575601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001053074,0.00023163407,0.00020845214,0.00008119209,0.00033531914,0.00020840147,0.0005142723,0.00039564402,0.00050284114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008580744,0.00051695586,0.06584997,0.0002232999,0.00011692107,0.00073699193,0.00024406843,0.00049927324,0.90494066,0.0002368726,0.00046389012,0.017590307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105500876,0.0011904944,0.9786258,0.000023124976,0.000082812294,0.0004932554,0.00019857266,0.0010272602,0.017179364,0.00011955624,0.00094035454,0.00001383865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026669416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009738729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00575601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026342913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040555737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019255817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165794323","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.038","title":"The effects of heat stress, predation risk and parental investment on Malaysian plover nest return times following a human disturbance","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Plover; Disturbance (geology); Nest (protein structural motif); Predation; Ecology; Heat stress; Biology; Geography; Animal science; Habitat","score_opus":0.009111412214567132,"score_gpt":0.2176403393949084,"score_spread":0.20852892718034127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165794323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998597,0.000015459733,0.0000058264773,0.000008069106,0.0000010798394,4.775472e-7,0.00002043967,3.1955264e-7,0.00008869676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975425,0.000016258396,0.000013157865,0.000005133408,0.0000016531596,0.0000011670074,0.000040838226,3.9770538e-7,0.00016711527],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999008,0.00001984038,0.0000079735255,0.00001910753,0.000010893208,0.000041435418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881965,0.0002653251,0.00047125467,0.00004212498,0.00007026534,0.00033139647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002696984,0.00017363038,0.00013194732,0.0003068805,0.00030158288,0.00046874143,0.00019596485,0.0003985817,0.0014963761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011490444,0.00015497838,0.00027409484,0.00026549975,0.00030279494,0.00026296315,0.0002854371,0.0005205634,0.00022552362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074643065,0.00018886561,0.9948013,0.000009173092,0.000047697675,0.00016855392,0.00033500465,0.00020336582,0.0011762119,0.000020139307,0.000058669535,0.0022445924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.8189146e-7,0.000081612496,0.99956936,9.0503823e-7,0.0000049945534,0.000035264064,0.0001664906,0.00007461608,0.000037079415,0.000005405248,0.000022048334,0.0000013840885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008669886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034323942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008669886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049756316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025422886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017238855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166181523","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(99)00068-3","title":"Distribution of three monkey species along a gradient of regenerating tropical dry forest","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Park Service; University of Alberta","keywords":"Transect; Habitat; Tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf forests; National park; Geography; Ecology; Tropical forest; Biomass (ecology); Wildlife; Tropics; Forestry; Biology; Agroforestry","score_opus":0.09626440355746473,"score_gpt":0.3018840801841034,"score_spread":0.20561967662663866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166181523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99969673,0.000014883088,0.000012800251,0.000003903547,3.0701403e-7,0.0000013827897,0.00001657533,6.529787e-7,0.00025271912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997764,0.000018241846,0.00005571347,0.0000059921445,7.681906e-7,0.0000025284942,0.00004063486,4.3610848e-7,0.000099421966],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992037,0.0000218298,0.000004445185,0.000015937305,0.000009771134,0.000027656997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961865,0.00007255621,0.00012981986,0.000018921824,0.000050172115,0.00010985363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018438944,0.00013312124,0.00014731892,0.0007517855,0.00075129454,0.000405877,0.00016668839,0.00018318572,0.0009659933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044882103,0.000079685706,0.00009490539,0.00037653773,0.00064402836,0.00016172751,0.00043724,0.00018701279,0.00010311658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046384335,0.00007289737,0.975752,0.000024776593,0.000036787613,0.00019269982,0.00340272,0.000097901044,0.014919894,0.00016645827,0.00007988629,0.004790278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002447932,0.0000431343,0.9983365,0.0000016251304,0.0000063236007,0.000099694436,0.0011427299,0.000049056744,0.00016311207,0.000022472927,0.00013155902,0.0000014985787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011020288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046100453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011020288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035491952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017570033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021912336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170600888","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.07.029","title":"Using a novel survey technique to predict fisheries stakeholders’ support for European eel (Anguilla anguilla L.) conservation programs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Escapement; Fishing; Fishery; Business; Stock (firearms); Fish stock; Environmental resource management; Preference; Stakeholder; Fisheries management; Geography; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.5406014207082467,"score_gpt":0.2882287402309766,"score_spread":0.2523726804772701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170600888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752294,0.00004995988,0.022437718,0.00011609364,0.00001222032,0.000034492587,0.00082426536,0.000072794486,0.0012230936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912107,0.000035135818,0.0077791177,0.00001728897,0.000008784548,0.000037353973,0.000577055,0.0000029959779,0.0003316625],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994499,0.00027162107,0.00003420452,0.00010995311,0.00008285349,0.00005149802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551904,0.0028687955,0.0008371721,0.00022487657,0.00040990714,0.0001402452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013890464,0.00031082972,0.00024181978,0.0012565736,0.00017939227,0.0005438179,0.00038073235,0.0006221457,0.0011360067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006551432,0.00015669852,0.0002574506,0.0012460431,0.00012782705,0.00075456203,0.00038311133,0.00032948202,0.00032341952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033165482,0.0004941374,0.9042235,0.00003644581,0.00017770547,0.000093704235,0.0002219199,0.021608047,0.0025397968,0.00072642043,0.0015393132,0.06800747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048411246,0.00047234833,0.51259613,0.000018469776,0.00007034328,0.00015234546,0.0005361397,0.4824257,0.0013141689,0.0012522814,0.0010836524,0.000029963829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009252868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016727213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009252868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039774377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032527235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018398046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173310646","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.10.008","title":"The conservation value of high elevation habitats to North American migrant birds","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Environment Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; American Ornithologists' Union","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Species richness; Geography; Threatened species; Abundance (ecology); Range (aeronautics); Elevation (ballistics); Biology","score_opus":0.045951059780998116,"score_gpt":0.26304753144002707,"score_spread":0.21709647165902896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173310646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99133205,0.00040841525,0.000068230256,0.00095891266,0.000013614087,0.0000016910114,0.000035009598,0.0000014966979,0.0071805785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99922633,0.00017824704,0.000056988618,0.000062941115,0.000011208194,8.6827924e-7,0.000013289196,5.8152807e-7,0.0004495347],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983966,0.00007391249,0.0000046891546,0.0000147703495,0.000030326564,0.00003670659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923754,0.00018054791,0.00024506534,0.000055845856,0.00012035001,0.0001607475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036643914,0.00008092526,0.00008586176,0.00038339465,0.00091480406,0.0010122041,0.00023132288,0.0003061263,0.0038461995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016654704,0.00007735252,0.0000874688,0.00044719136,0.0009824642,0.0004872481,0.0004699232,0.0002855898,0.00009937138],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002547272,0.00010906351,0.92881215,0.000069452115,0.000105127605,0.00053091405,0.0023394006,0.0005898598,0.0021535,0.002159256,0.0017327745,0.061143834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049744563,0.000041692263,0.99286604,0.000023549752,0.00002381558,0.00020284268,0.003924751,0.00018511906,0.0000960537,0.0006682115,0.0019596403,0.0000032129453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015126742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11223458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015126742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054646627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026878226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030077398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218656748","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.025","title":"A long-term genetic study reveals complex population dynamics of multiple-source plant reintroductions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation","keywords":"Outbreeding depression; Inbreeding depression; Biology; Population fragmentation; Local adaptation; Inbreeding; Ecology; Maladaptation; Genetic diversity; Population; Heterosis; Small population size; Conservation genetics; Microsatellite; Demography; Allele; Agronomy; Habitat; Genetics","score_opus":0.08067905779956103,"score_gpt":0.2804100699380045,"score_spread":0.19973101213844346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218656748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993298,0.00004342221,0.00042055798,0.0000061137007,0.000001379635,0.0000027453286,0.000035442943,0.000008399607,0.00015212517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895513,0.000032421023,0.0005288772,0.00001100616,0.0000019171512,0.000008115681,0.00014735745,0.00000757596,0.0003075628],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998017,0.000027339674,0.000011857428,0.000090812195,0.000028589664,0.0000398114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948174,0.000113006754,0.00010979732,0.00010218359,0.00010857446,0.00008465478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005319833,0.00024522425,0.0003959345,0.00088168547,0.0005486829,0.00043277626,0.000543842,0.0003249271,0.0009827071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006418549,0.00014106577,0.0003309377,0.0005256898,0.00034924046,0.0004258653,0.000547733,0.00053252565,0.0001987341],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004362173,0.0002578233,0.24616235,0.000054652966,0.00022368087,0.0004997456,0.00081902446,0.0013783096,0.7176541,0.0007848864,0.00014717119,0.03158197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001652061,0.00027307967,0.9790487,0.000011660372,0.000121251054,0.000689618,0.0005377534,0.0058877994,0.012042836,0.0003806299,0.000959422,0.000030687195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015160952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005659154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0015160952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042671702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020819849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0032874942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232909250","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.040","title":"Beta diversity declines while native plant species richness triples over 35years in a suburban protected area","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Species evenness; Alpha diversity; Biodiversity; Beta diversity; Ecology; Gamma diversity; Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Species diversity; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.06695658307928322,"score_gpt":0.23437586542653882,"score_spread":0.16741928234725562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232909250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998085,0.000013887246,0.000013227527,0.000026528409,0.0000012508691,6.606344e-7,0.00003415596,0.0000017027775,0.00010011698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99965215,0.000014398619,0.000017779532,0.000014432671,0.000002223159,0.0000016391342,0.000068802445,6.556934e-7,0.00022779904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983644,0.000034909677,0.000008186011,0.00003662755,0.0000192518,0.0000644153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994518,0.000032275726,0.00018268239,0.00003901335,0.00006234696,0.00023197426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025423517,0.00017190182,0.00017004661,0.00046969007,0.00076133665,0.00052186253,0.0004084613,0.00023347308,0.0012900223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039817533,0.00014755862,0.00016087283,0.0004984021,0.0005503312,0.00039371444,0.0006518187,0.00031652232,0.00016666311],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019336224,0.00015023693,0.9943409,0.0000082078805,0.000046402733,0.00013055712,0.00066615466,0.00009257762,0.0009058196,0.000045679008,0.00032175524,0.0030983458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029206462,0.000060348597,0.99844885,0.0000016841744,0.000008144155,0.000070866474,0.00095346215,0.00017777523,0.0000761432,0.000034356257,0.00016367024,0.000001637425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030637281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1301388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030637281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006884788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048289506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060917914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254101760","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.01.015","title":"Optimising different types of biodiversity coverage of protected areas with a case study using Himalayan Galliformes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Galliformes; Biodiversity; Species richness; Threatened species; Geography; Global biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.04605082224620229,"score_gpt":0.2442325053887587,"score_spread":0.1981816831425564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254101760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98895675,0.0001065075,0.008851387,0.00009065349,0.0000061177943,0.000047556798,0.00017121158,0.000099762125,0.0016700967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97365713,0.000059861824,0.025524396,0.000014839311,0.0000031039958,0.000022467246,0.00018847923,0.000028270872,0.0005014055],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947625,0.00025656153,0.000025280113,0.0001023254,0.00006125205,0.000078349585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975049,0.0017403536,0.00016057302,0.00018919368,0.00028407946,0.00012094881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016354945,0.0008448722,0.00042994987,0.0017397809,0.0005778389,0.0014430316,0.00077901565,0.0007704,0.0016260094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005960662,0.00035837718,0.0007100672,0.0014119826,0.0006359424,0.0010304968,0.000840221,0.00044938165,0.00012343859],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027246345,0.00018558823,0.09904723,0.00022225564,0.00022694249,0.0007724036,0.0012302677,0.859755,0.004136481,0.0023873018,0.00061481184,0.031149216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007976176,0.00030378747,0.073865026,0.00005512326,0.00018393162,0.0002893598,0.002215685,0.9123096,0.0057191597,0.0027335163,0.002183023,0.00006214294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051845793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.066978306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051845793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017784144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066891743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10308802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292935233","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.02.022","title":"Integrated population modeling to assess demographic variation and contributions to population growth for endangered whooping cranes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Environment Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Fledge; Endangered species; Biology; Population; Population growth; Ecology; Population size; Abundance (ecology); Demography; Zoology; Hatching; Habitat","score_opus":0.06939636994840025,"score_gpt":0.29850205817418496,"score_spread":0.2291056882257847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292935233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9279082,0.000098469995,0.07000543,0.00010754491,0.000019927626,0.00003043638,0.00026399276,0.00014430749,0.0014217899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752519,0.000045706336,0.022923058,0.000025857424,0.000009144197,0.00004662017,0.000388704,0.000029389546,0.0012795606],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978465,0.000097622964,0.000010418649,0.000050481303,0.000025263374,0.000031603744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923503,0.00042819642,0.000093108996,0.00007140011,0.00011874346,0.000053416778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010962756,0.00040183408,0.00040313113,0.00057417294,0.00043884784,0.00046052536,0.0009137914,0.0003866813,0.0013365624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027737909,0.00039993072,0.00047683896,0.0005009842,0.00020293007,0.0005067806,0.0005808178,0.0005033778,0.000112326496],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011258025,0.00013355321,0.04919959,0.000014381893,0.00029682874,0.000036723486,0.000117744894,0.9289366,0.0006399315,0.0020984847,0.0005218806,0.017891645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009461642,0.000018784267,0.004693808,0.0000024775625,0.000030351606,0.000006286477,0.00002154512,0.99454874,0.0000797303,0.00048377487,0.00010226157,0.000002759417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07286981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08847683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07286981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096555345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011881618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14489132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294390461","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.02.033","title":"Prioritizing management actions for the conservation of freshwater biodiversity under changing climate and land-cover","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Global Institute for Water Security","funders":"Queensland Government; University of Queensland; Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Australian Research Council","keywords":"Riparian zone; Climate change; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem services; Land cover; Adaptive management; Land use; Biodiversity; Land management; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental science; Ecosystem; Ecology; Habitat","score_opus":0.057326083969648306,"score_gpt":0.24263818741565538,"score_spread":0.18531210344600707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294390461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7046552,0.0140753975,0.07271985,0.08927845,0.0013378994,0.0022679407,0.001853735,0.00047117012,0.11334036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96209896,0.0022657393,0.03020354,0.0018695283,0.00015583495,0.00033870575,0.00021086882,0.00003127179,0.0028255861],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948673,0.0031712116,0.0001735736,0.00026048557,0.00076067605,0.0007666516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99511683,0.0017356541,0.0009337782,0.00012349056,0.0009626526,0.0011275788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007067375,0.00081120286,0.00065640506,0.0043006986,0.0017939473,0.0045085317,0.001434445,0.0018907243,0.007554956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010086772,0.0003270198,0.0004622049,0.0028421448,0.0009293172,0.0026227727,0.0018806501,0.001450805,0.00033252884],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012235306,0.0020032276,0.19122913,0.0032278053,0.0020336215,0.0013565825,0.0035071676,0.0592297,0.018569784,0.08132813,0.046758197,0.5895332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005943118,0.0018854095,0.40693265,0.0032784347,0.0020877074,0.00084818987,0.048595898,0.1822616,0.01213046,0.22392754,0.11710264,0.00035516263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01669753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08129014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01669753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005024973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015279972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037376285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298262464","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.02.013","title":"Reducing the impacts of Neotropical oil palm development on functional diversity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Oil Palm Production and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Agroforestry; Habitat; Biodiversity; Foraging; Abundance (ecology); Species diversity; Geography; Alpha diversity; Biology","score_opus":0.05060310659022804,"score_gpt":0.2306215016171966,"score_spread":0.18001839502696856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298262464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98494256,0.0006693623,0.0013350872,0.0006516945,0.000012385944,0.000015413658,0.0001376959,0.000020388141,0.01221555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99793136,0.00046323412,0.00070800196,0.00011801946,0.0000053664544,0.000010386183,0.00003545598,0.000003994615,0.0007241423],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997416,0.000057519654,0.000008119965,0.000031100062,0.000054002718,0.000107638814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995265,0.000066073095,0.000115875664,0.000055472818,0.00011034769,0.0001258302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064085855,0.00037627184,0.00014008631,0.00043581292,0.00038518058,0.0006836796,0.00039198273,0.0002257523,0.002860398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016159575,0.0000666804,0.00019350077,0.00057225226,0.00069254305,0.00059909804,0.0015769041,0.00025690402,0.00019587461],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007815679,0.00039119352,0.48043832,0.0007429771,0.0004956703,0.0009313454,0.001876356,0.027057314,0.1164141,0.020924151,0.0034211983,0.34652573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045017307,0.00026529416,0.9482624,0.00012302406,0.00013717703,0.00032056452,0.0032805027,0.009106743,0.0070683137,0.00827525,0.023094358,0.000021489454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023269346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09054544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023269346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015074104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002361573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046267807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305233476","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.003","title":"De-extinction potential under climate change: Extensive mismatch between historic and future habitat suitability for three candidate birds","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Woodpecker; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Habitat destruction; Extinction debt; Range (aeronautics); Climate change; Local extinction; Occupancy; Umbrella species; Endangered species; Biology; Population; Biological dispersal","score_opus":0.06293912733086529,"score_gpt":0.26951949058625796,"score_spread":0.20658036325539267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305233476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99964285,0.000008924029,0.0000755627,0.000014297842,0.0000010769255,0.0000012048578,0.000032518703,0.0000013824279,0.00022217033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998628,0.0000022455301,0.00004666256,0.0000031354346,5.942469e-7,0.000001229527,0.00003444342,5.421522e-7,0.00004840316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998795,0.00002175824,0.0000096374615,0.000033814948,0.000013873868,0.000041401632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999275,0.00022220852,0.0001886953,0.00006334898,0.00007851047,0.00017220665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005658085,0.00014989641,0.00015849348,0.0003567143,0.000518864,0.0005070703,0.00036719377,0.00036877365,0.0026473904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011045324,0.00009376727,0.00024612393,0.00026252802,0.00032651797,0.00032308765,0.00041269837,0.00026190325,0.00014802664],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070755545,0.00009354391,0.98724467,0.00001431436,0.000068800466,0.00020344293,0.00020743688,0.0016846651,0.0048928317,0.00024310367,0.00010627952,0.004533354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008796254,0.00013581714,0.9938937,0.0000020571965,0.000038429076,0.0003195554,0.00045842177,0.0039529866,0.00081721426,0.00016967463,0.0001972441,0.0000061168935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029894006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008958324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029894006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000343105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018889937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008856416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461412668","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.024","title":"Loss of seed dispersal before the loss of seed dispersers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Frugivore; Biological dispersal; Seed dispersal; Threatened species; Biology; Population; Seed dispersal syndrome; Defaunation; Ecology; Habitat destruction; Small population size; Allee effect; Ecosystem; Habitat; Disturbance (geology); Seed predation","score_opus":0.018591377603973527,"score_gpt":0.2365651311721663,"score_spread":0.21797375356819276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461412668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99539846,0.00045944695,0.0011347588,0.00021577386,0.000035946843,0.000016264064,0.00026514503,0.000039297247,0.0024347454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99694127,0.000049145317,0.0002963958,0.000072796836,0.00001315111,0.000008221455,0.00020961101,0.000008364417,0.00240091],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997538,0.000025654108,0.000014669557,0.00008902123,0.000043714335,0.000073112285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782467,0.00041788313,0.00052035786,0.00034719912,0.00029160356,0.0005982848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061229337,0.00017553306,0.00041000085,0.0004583151,0.00049614307,0.0008391764,0.00038108224,0.0006641716,0.0060933153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027804435,0.0001634834,0.00032547183,0.00019806802,0.000540643,0.0009385532,0.00057846017,0.0012231686,0.0007011493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0061551738,0.00079802197,0.57402056,0.00040693005,0.00042179888,0.0023330918,0.0010401387,0.0033940347,0.30914164,0.0073439553,0.0036954433,0.09124922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052661297,0.0015293622,0.9648963,0.000040538016,0.0000707158,0.0023930962,0.000420891,0.001865294,0.02058657,0.0011889027,0.0069330884,0.000022591139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024577128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023912385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060933153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005626295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045277894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020384192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482939527","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.020","title":"Camera-based occupancy monitoring at large scales: Power to detect trends in grizzly bears across the Canadian Rockies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada","funders":"Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative; Parks Canada; University of Montana","keywords":"Occupancy; Ursus; Threatened species; Grizzly Bears; Metric (unit); Camera trap; Geography; Scale (ratio); Abundance (ecology); Cartography; Ecology; Remote sensing; Physical geography; Environmental science; Habitat; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.028880811945012318,"score_gpt":0.26912732457145444,"score_spread":0.24024651262644212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482939527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946637,0.00052144134,0.000766873,0.00016411948,0.000013432479,0.00003026438,0.0005431012,0.000028301445,0.0032687169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997398,0.00036795536,0.0011505281,0.00007269716,0.000012848453,0.000015532416,0.00036734913,0.0000112448715,0.00060394156],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993711,0.00010675607,0.000012011514,0.00014638029,0.00018838295,0.0001753795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976732,0.0006185807,0.00037969532,0.00020871886,0.0009100517,0.00020964371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015354712,0.00032770424,0.00031258631,0.00096525915,0.0010743497,0.00083306,0.00091640407,0.00035296447,0.0011873811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039593843,0.00034425748,0.00021545809,0.001272035,0.00070154294,0.0005185031,0.0006022327,0.00042221133,0.00016511268],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013299758,0.000044446595,0.94882464,0.000048927264,0.00019145862,0.0000413304,0.0011556789,0.001049918,0.0026816784,0.00007901051,0.0013404262,0.044409513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034117247,0.00001476922,0.99761164,0.00000989755,0.000039210096,0.000025195797,0.00043736244,0.0010936444,0.00012001779,0.000033003158,0.00060458155,0.000007194875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8548457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96531683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1451543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019684078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024510964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29201823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508993631","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.022","title":"Phylogenetic regionalization of marine plants reveals close evolutionary affinities among disjunct temperate assemblages","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine and coastal plant biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Phylogenetic tree; Disjunct; Biological dispersal; Ecology; Phylogenetic diversity; Biology; Temperate climate; Niche; Evolutionary biology; Geography; Population","score_opus":0.038909443133616536,"score_gpt":0.21679601220465528,"score_spread":0.17788656907103872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508993631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99839514,0.0002406794,0.00030664727,0.0000152390085,0.0000010488974,0.0000019424915,0.00006413941,0.000005353569,0.0009697567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933845,0.00010870072,0.00021486035,0.00001573853,0.0000032138107,0.000002405601,0.0001780212,0.000007412954,0.0001312034],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999678,0.000057436344,0.000020644082,0.00014004813,0.000040094965,0.0000638638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990357,0.00027777758,0.00029366981,0.0001181219,0.00013829659,0.00013649365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052073813,0.0002215148,0.00045216325,0.002392744,0.0011628773,0.0010917848,0.00040066798,0.00038280993,0.0026070771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010196635,0.00022524553,0.00023594362,0.0014328081,0.0009283923,0.00048958475,0.0012235478,0.00044379637,0.00041856777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009531163,0.00007098122,0.7472886,0.00019761772,0.0003698362,0.00029108435,0.012184202,0.0005264125,0.20964812,0.0015663375,0.0001657731,0.02673799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056226563,0.000041981577,0.9969118,0.000012355915,0.000036535355,0.00018198976,0.0011880909,0.00025473785,0.00048340225,0.00017081053,0.00070726074,0.000005553739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028994388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008069404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028994388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034905653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022537186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00872153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510852584","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.11.024","title":"Corrigendum to “One step ahead of the plow: Using cropland conversion risk to guide Sprague's pipit conservation in the northern Great Plains” [Biol. Conserv. 191 (2015) 739–749]","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Plough; Geography; Forestry; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06502875682165701,"score_gpt":0.26222875855287797,"score_spread":0.19720000173122096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510852584","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015994607,0.0016620526,0.0006297169,0.123329826,0.84648323,0.00010867129,0.0031529705,0.0007034795,0.0237701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034152367,0.0043368526,0.0022750306,0.25905183,0.13149254,0.0004214271,0.0035368183,0.0008588001,0.59461147],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974443,0.00030971377,0.00045345028,0.00036176108,0.0011877876,0.00024303593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834803,0.0030088506,0.0007765524,0.00064524566,0.011395037,0.0006939786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00232926,0.0021157607,0.0019804083,0.0027844368,0.0040807826,0.0032229268,0.003226374,0.008889691,0.07543181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0231739,0.0014555126,0.0018295263,0.0019198633,0.0020633305,0.0026662722,0.0022790714,0.01066305,0.06152666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004959676,0.000004727585,0.000031546417,0.00002342603,0.0000016196318,0.00003216745,0.0000072333737,0.000016684131,0.000012766562,0.00017168763,0.998013,0.0016800914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027315855,0.000017632943,0.0018437087,0.00021395147,0.000013812961,0.000076334414,0.00007990399,0.0001620801,0.000112178,0.0008623568,0.99654996,0.00004069763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14497463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20450595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14497463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040707253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065507707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2882616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2538503382","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.001","title":"When natural habitat fails to enhance biological pest control – Five hypotheses","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Insect-Plant Interactions and Control","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":599,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Basic Energy Sciences; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Cotton Research and Development Corporation; Seventh Framework Programme; Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Habitat; Biodiversity; Ecology; Pest control; Biological pest control; PEST analysis; Agriculture; Natural (archaeology); Integrated pest management; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem; Agroforestry; Biology","score_opus":0.027881173837331713,"score_gpt":0.24037885896285202,"score_spread":0.2124976851255203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2538503382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9023524,0.0020416132,0.012004338,0.031935398,0.00026991568,0.00022557398,0.00042623247,0.0001067212,0.05063794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949792,0.000214491,0.0023092239,0.0016229457,0.00011419343,0.00006644406,0.000090075846,0.000007796787,0.00059566577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807584,0.00076548,0.00013303102,0.00048130352,0.00026288844,0.00028137187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750665,0.01340816,0.006432054,0.0016345982,0.0013508038,0.0021078642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007813371,0.0008324689,0.0007931537,0.0011981969,0.00069006585,0.0019669067,0.0021474855,0.0037952436,0.012380997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018777875,0.00041302954,0.00070434256,0.0005897386,0.00523297,0.0044280817,0.0020530468,0.000978076,0.00053749635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0063252416,0.0053111906,0.58187014,0.0028419837,0.0020531157,0.0030735324,0.0009891337,0.026098305,0.020277148,0.19652966,0.011853234,0.14277723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015622344,0.0054206843,0.6016817,0.00032594477,0.0006985512,0.0028736275,0.003159887,0.054917045,0.006558562,0.3150463,0.0075547462,0.00020071284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076924707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016784462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012380997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011630711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010419228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041418552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546792435","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.039","title":"Optimizing land use decision-making to sustain Brazilian agricultural profits, biodiversity and ecosystem services","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; 3M Foundation; Nature Conservancy; Dow Chemical Company","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Sustainability; Biodiversity; Business; Agriculture; Land use; Environmental resource management; Landscape planning; Profit (economics); Habitat; Agricultural productivity; Natural resource economics; Ecosystem; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.0854526160154626,"score_gpt":0.21777752187927588,"score_spread":0.1323249058638133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546792435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9110043,0.0006579874,0.06328695,0.0010972973,0.000018053102,0.00007766147,0.0005450627,0.00019137187,0.02312132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99227726,0.00014476868,0.0071194945,0.000019135972,0.0000015283839,0.000018332888,0.00007659581,0.000016473161,0.00032634393],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972326,0.00010663788,0.000010933765,0.00004662166,0.00003561041,0.00007683622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995598,0.0002044893,0.00008430809,0.00005182794,0.000059211554,0.000040297753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007710246,0.00044778726,0.00039347578,0.00042832154,0.00033143625,0.0014767676,0.00049836386,0.00042698722,0.0013083209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019776893,0.0002604689,0.0005235321,0.0006413489,0.00053072954,0.0009403299,0.00071101385,0.00035013937,0.0001112102],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005271562,0.000056939305,0.023068003,0.00007734003,0.000054823155,0.00006704184,0.00012086766,0.9367897,0.002485725,0.012610125,0.0005628595,0.024053883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003688928,0.00006658048,0.01947231,0.000052926996,0.000060777125,0.00003463914,0.0004229238,0.9586274,0.0011882572,0.01653904,0.0034758188,0.000022531263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043512907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08149398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043512907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023361426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021859496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0865193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549402100","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.11.002","title":"Physical footprint of oil and gas infrastructure, not anthropogenic noise, reduces nesting success of some grassland songbirds","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Alberta; University of Manitoba; Cenovus Energy","keywords":"Sparrow; Grassland; Environmental science; Ecology; Nest (protein structural motif); Wildlife; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.040024043272605184,"score_gpt":0.30084294037177595,"score_spread":0.2608188970991708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549402100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99982053,0.000021029167,0.000038920032,0.000007996637,0.0000012123778,3.5473641e-7,0.000009970147,0.0000021529675,0.00009780091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997137,0.000015405853,0.000070281836,0.000013030337,0.0000018010414,0.0000015707045,0.000028963761,0.0000018776062,0.00015322561],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99990463,0.00002826014,0.0000051268803,0.000025039626,0.000012530917,0.000024367246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994418,0.00009349784,0.00021406685,0.000052504485,0.00003285346,0.00016517293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015886842,0.00015353985,0.0001649465,0.00018799682,0.00020430422,0.0002670066,0.00019356296,0.00021637997,0.0013782254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005146281,0.00013484598,0.000121277815,0.00009281787,0.00033258146,0.00017383661,0.00018493828,0.00020568515,0.00009455255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009949271,0.00028632345,0.8771034,0.000074351374,0.0003075264,0.00021771334,0.00033170465,0.00043186056,0.110544525,0.000075360644,0.00023523727,0.009397143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022957815,0.00011020893,0.99887997,0.0000017615131,0.000015411924,0.00005291368,0.000115351446,0.00015585365,0.0005813765,0.000014064441,0.000069202055,0.0000016247237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00429587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01509712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00429587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012809782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012726056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008541703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2551371737","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.037","title":"Importance of the matrix in determining small-mammal assemblages in an Amazonian forest-savanna mosaic","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Evolution and Paleontology Studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Ecology; Frugivore; Habitat; Ordination; Mammal; Amazonian; Biology; Context (archaeology); Insectivore; Amazon rainforest","score_opus":0.07114410386217594,"score_gpt":0.27519424622492805,"score_spread":0.2040501423627521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2551371737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995672,0.000060605067,0.00010143295,0.0000104118435,7.0497066e-7,0.000002405438,0.000024830959,0.0000015835692,0.00023083047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998783,0.000009725393,0.00006906173,0.0000014577846,7.020008e-7,9.3654967e-7,0.000010143233,9.286484e-7,0.000028678203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995579,0.0001581012,0.000037167818,0.000104496816,0.000060678296,0.00008166575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986218,0.00040016454,0.00044917,0.00008365085,0.00017912046,0.00026598995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005563863,0.00016078235,0.00025224467,0.0014637684,0.0013255747,0.0011312352,0.00046512796,0.00020278346,0.0015750554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026714557,0.00026659758,0.00018458857,0.00091676385,0.0011921643,0.000481081,0.0009503573,0.00017035301,0.00011412435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016088439,0.000018397901,0.9862817,0.000023305729,0.00007685366,0.000090388276,0.0017806708,0.00008706295,0.0075489623,0.00026309644,0.000026192343,0.0036425001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026229934,0.000019283272,0.99770445,0.000004578449,0.0000284882,0.00012756645,0.0012315679,0.00044876168,0.0001905926,0.00010576458,0.00013340106,0.0000028758977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04580883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21716122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04580883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005710682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057078415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09108436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554533380","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.035","title":"Integrative conservation of riparian zones","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Ministry of Environment; Society for Conservation Biology","keywords":"Riparian zone; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geography; Recreation; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Habitat","score_opus":0.03174077326032105,"score_gpt":0.2394090165952011,"score_spread":0.20766824333488007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554533380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5763659,0.024151325,0.0565709,0.008242213,0.00016523719,0.00010502744,0.00035075954,0.00029301632,0.33375564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866099,0.0027971407,0.005761079,0.00026897874,0.000039280494,0.000021240086,0.00009860603,0.000022369059,0.004381496],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971443,0.00010266046,0.00001112302,0.000057784302,0.00006167019,0.000052410436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968207,0.000043700365,0.000065506865,0.000088955356,0.0000523871,0.000067341534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006823312,0.00017244474,0.00022725669,0.00081181095,0.0007632864,0.0017010616,0.00077780656,0.00039278582,0.0043170364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007554528,0.000102066,0.00013023967,0.00068172347,0.0015163587,0.00092433713,0.0018797403,0.0004141147,0.00017001582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011619952,0.00015258166,0.025829947,0.0005073187,0.00022554389,0.00031078252,0.0025561042,0.011804421,0.015131626,0.2830534,0.0068248315,0.6534872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058091944,0.00026177638,0.29941273,0.00091199006,0.00028391555,0.0009887599,0.007330513,0.021645308,0.0059254006,0.35447156,0.30864647,0.000063532425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036562472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011505508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043170364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010539979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012341965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014441967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557811647","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.006","title":"Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Waterloo; University of Victoria; University of Saskatchewan; University of Guelph; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Conservation psychology; Reflexivity; Conservation science; Sociology; Salient; Behavioural sciences; Management science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social science; Ecology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.06325914652177446,"score_gpt":0.3071131222302789,"score_spread":0.24385397570850448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557811647","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017289644,0.085290454,0.116388135,0.51206625,0.0033823985,0.00050463283,0.0002561839,0.00029615176,0.26452616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6786744,0.15589032,0.10590716,0.04086986,0.0044321753,0.0008219101,0.00030019856,0.00012398847,0.012979995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893355,0.0076551028,0.00028516955,0.000552315,0.00174528,0.00042676172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98814756,0.008213296,0.0009228549,0.00087892124,0.0009786383,0.000858733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017181482,0.0010099034,0.000944153,0.007148235,0.005000175,0.011565621,0.0017645916,0.0048575443,0.005746554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012666148,0.00036807577,0.0007389629,0.004832897,0.04560979,0.014097374,0.009526714,0.0051307855,0.000503457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008412019,0.00008750592,0.0026874563,0.0011205644,0.000046451267,0.00010827788,0.013103213,0.0010242823,0.00024293922,0.8692521,0.0124946805,0.0998242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000500203,0.00003312021,0.0024435632,0.0016267768,0.000017407729,0.00010235061,0.012727359,0.000619847,0.00019276529,0.83068156,0.1515205,0.000029643612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008618008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012557952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017181482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008234836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026438687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09086549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565632709","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.011","title":"Recent increases in human pressure and forest loss threaten many Natural World Heritage Sites","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Wildlife; Biosphere; Geography; National park; World heritage; Natural (archaeology); Environmental protection; Biodiversity; Ecology; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Biology; Habitat; Archaeology; Tourism","score_opus":0.03235157782435898,"score_gpt":0.22541744828170668,"score_spread":0.1930658704573477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565632709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.929257,0.0028869745,0.0015849374,0.004183395,0.00039374855,0.000060893348,0.0011742623,0.00009205044,0.06036682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848379,0.0023505213,0.0018912328,0.0008206507,0.00026501223,0.000019825373,0.00069404155,0.000015222345,0.009105529],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997285,0.000038308503,0.000010265402,0.000021071755,0.00013023752,0.000071641814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990375,0.00010514869,0.00037254283,0.00005806873,0.00015647622,0.00027031693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036976812,0.0002054143,0.0001472737,0.0009163355,0.0018290995,0.0016482068,0.00044225095,0.0004909217,0.013421106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011353672,0.0001065923,0.00012791094,0.0018737671,0.0011308651,0.0008530242,0.0014684373,0.0008349272,0.0010681897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017562235,0.00031861616,0.5475371,0.00042542117,0.00010170836,0.0015996828,0.0025725309,0.0009868839,0.0074307895,0.0038417315,0.021790711,0.41321918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058389455,0.000085643675,0.9180134,0.00005513826,0.000027155731,0.0011709608,0.0066716094,0.00031978954,0.00066594395,0.0013709151,0.07159464,0.000018970308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010484158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09275651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013421106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005777645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006540402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044898093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587274389","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.015","title":"Ecosystem implications of conserving endemic versus eradicating introduced large herbivores in the Galapagos Archipelago","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Herbivore; Productivity; Archipelago; Ecosystem; Ecology; Tortoise; Vegetation (pathology); Biodiversity; Biology; Introduced species","score_opus":0.06594068941072828,"score_gpt":0.2945076214287655,"score_spread":0.22856693201803724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587274389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973699,0.00041748278,0.000037911737,0.0010313242,0.0000071573845,0.0000024799483,0.00003170479,0.0000033397105,0.0010986842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937695,0.00027274102,0.00006139386,0.00017897882,0.000003770691,0.0000017124856,0.000013500299,9.4047004e-7,0.00008997947],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973875,0.0001260014,0.000009431395,0.000024345552,0.000019499135,0.00008193525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937004,0.00015355348,0.00011851659,0.000028858532,0.00008180535,0.00024715328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007448842,0.00018747593,0.00017101165,0.00064511166,0.00065297796,0.0013357722,0.00043891853,0.0005955305,0.0012586364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010973095,0.00011514202,0.00021396833,0.00050489075,0.0016585207,0.0005085485,0.0010834349,0.00041412248,0.000043079443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012813836,0.00027644026,0.9105382,0.0005635989,0.0007816337,0.002192119,0.0032478576,0.0087303845,0.0209694,0.0052145133,0.0017102509,0.044494282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006639238,0.00009366559,0.98685974,0.00008478136,0.0001769847,0.00028437754,0.006588661,0.0018121143,0.00045179244,0.0018273678,0.0017382134,0.000015858403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03134095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11401742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03134095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019570347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012140966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062317073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588858606","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.005","title":"Future extinction risk of wetland plants is higher from individual patch loss than total area reduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Wetland; Extinction debt; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Habitat destruction; Habitat; Woodland; Ecology; Biodiversity; Habitat fragmentation; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.03721698492672075,"score_gpt":0.24714930784417083,"score_spread":0.20993232291745006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588858606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973878,0.00025223428,0.0005592771,0.00010512243,0.0000055970227,0.000003337071,0.000059507965,0.0000055473365,0.001621611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907804,0.00011364184,0.00021561135,0.00003577141,0.000007786062,0.0000017592902,0.000068845475,0.000002615519,0.00047608934],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997243,0.00006383789,0.0000135430655,0.000096518634,0.00005616422,0.00004563559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841845,0.00033636193,0.00066731905,0.00019155494,0.0001791952,0.00020708235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006955612,0.00017588102,0.0002978457,0.0005135965,0.0003543894,0.0005274885,0.00024658054,0.00034264376,0.0038602839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013827921,0.00011187253,0.00051814265,0.00029507693,0.00034700174,0.00055769185,0.00044054768,0.00040646244,0.0002334557],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002421083,0.00009400337,0.9646766,0.000040703013,0.00037350136,0.00018114957,0.00012562041,0.0008723482,0.0064583025,0.0003939924,0.00020645479,0.026335308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022063107,0.00011547774,0.9974534,0.0000057999187,0.000056044548,0.00037573624,0.00015634467,0.00067129976,0.00039103001,0.0005026202,0.00026709886,0.000003034991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001871448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043934043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038602839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030795793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015348774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012914002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590507560","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.01.022","title":"Pan-Holarctic assessment of post-release mortality of angled Atlantic salmon Salmo salar","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ocean Tracking Network; Dalhousie University; Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Salmo; Fishery; Catch and release; Fishing; Range (aeronautics); Holarctic; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Population; Salmonidae; Recreational fishing; Ecology; Demography","score_opus":0.05053014126790042,"score_gpt":0.3027121543760632,"score_spread":0.2521820131081628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590507560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994136,0.00003693544,0.0000426057,0.000011925937,0.000003743326,0.0000021853252,0.00019779574,0.0000026145017,0.00028864955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877065,0.00006720774,0.00012369447,0.000018076316,0.000004090902,0.0000052409387,0.00055812707,0.0000017185073,0.0004511817],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998672,0.000038995226,0.000011412627,0.000027307953,0.0000266382,0.000028419943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993383,0.000055938588,0.00022525071,0.000039941915,0.00019586309,0.00014469984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006954402,0.00023312095,0.00013297572,0.0005336237,0.00028268527,0.00027701995,0.00017595518,0.00016570934,0.00057154224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005267431,0.00010989376,0.00014473205,0.00038226513,0.00017197627,0.00024239156,0.00036431526,0.00021448101,0.00017893087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022830037,0.0000608518,0.99476695,0.000008439686,0.000043182707,0.000035708916,0.00009560777,0.00012744876,0.0020128062,0.000009711963,0.00010879087,0.0025022998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011479186,0.000038365662,0.99967456,0.0000010269661,0.000006611374,0.000010097287,0.00008411802,0.000055581015,0.000080526894,0.0000011839023,0.000046320783,4.3036724e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036188502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16443188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036188502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004819234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045105364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07195574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606141457","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.03.021","title":"Can protected areas really maintain mammalian diversity? Insights from a nestedness analysis of the Colorado Plateau","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Park Service; McGill University","keywords":"Nestedness; Biodiversity; Biome; Geography; Ecology; Species richness; Range (aeronautics); Plateau (mathematics); Beta diversity; Ecosystem; Biology","score_opus":0.03153232430352467,"score_gpt":0.22502738117378981,"score_spread":0.19349505687026514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606141457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99939823,0.000047998856,0.00016630167,0.000044074633,4.883905e-7,6.5990815e-7,0.000020525245,8.2263443e-7,0.00032092494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999777,0.00001092789,0.000105426814,0.000008522328,0.0000013625845,9.1995156e-7,0.00003949255,0.0000013943187,0.000054912605],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995115,0.00018748417,0.000015351598,0.0001454942,0.0000420227,0.00009806726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736446,0.001160151,0.0005641967,0.00029572015,0.0003237222,0.00029173715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009704641,0.00010765351,0.0002961135,0.0006727685,0.0015112853,0.0009263831,0.0005301862,0.00035523452,0.0013676338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039629815,0.000118314645,0.0002727622,0.000807524,0.0014261316,0.00070078194,0.0006701362,0.00033706846,0.000066189605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009246484,0.000032101576,0.9866601,0.000012746179,0.00013667332,0.00012591215,0.0022674908,0.0017013432,0.0012714353,0.0022161943,0.00027201328,0.0052114655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005707978,0.000035506888,0.9844542,0.00001636094,0.000071993425,0.000106302025,0.004853855,0.007647274,0.00015837007,0.0019805303,0.00066296704,0.0000069208036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10897377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21403857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10897377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007438173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006532827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21667892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621125942","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.05.026","title":"An ecological connectivity network maintains genetic diversity of a flagship wildflower, Pulsatilla vulgaris","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ecology; Genetic diversity; Biology; Biological dispersal; Seed dispersal; Population; Grassland; Demography","score_opus":0.10913304189919054,"score_gpt":0.24878147490161334,"score_spread":0.1396484330024228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621125942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996555,0.000011598409,0.00015279569,0.000007477214,6.6297434e-7,0.0000011739891,0.00003656969,0.0000030710696,0.00013105254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997346,0.000006147539,0.0001255846,0.000004943499,9.086829e-7,0.0000016668811,0.0000746112,0.0000010991824,0.000050439605],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991715,0.000013732537,0.0000050877643,0.000040390318,0.000008874851,0.00001476327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994211,0.00014693604,0.00022135008,0.00003991974,0.000058868012,0.000111832094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016390343,0.00007890294,0.00012361551,0.0010137106,0.00046507388,0.00046075697,0.00028693478,0.00018208305,0.0005830434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008861582,0.000109161825,0.00009222736,0.00039304746,0.00038103355,0.000582232,0.00036952214,0.00016487982,0.0000516465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004700735,0.00016363774,0.8299587,0.00008283967,0.00022938935,0.00041464024,0.0017182459,0.0056593507,0.13721281,0.0022148688,0.00060956075,0.021265943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001677749,0.00009098813,0.9782236,0.00000931236,0.00007662107,0.00030082592,0.00079257187,0.01769426,0.0011848537,0.0010429588,0.0005553634,0.000011900641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045229043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008487073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045229043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038332082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019410411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008993149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625865863","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.06.005","title":"Spatial modelling of non-target exposure to anticoagulant rodenticides can inform mitigation options in two boreal predators inhabiting areas with intensive oil and gas development","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Secrétariat Général pour les Affaires Régionales, Etat en Région Aquitaine; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Alberta Environment and Parks; Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute","keywords":"Marten; Boreal; Taiga; Predation; Ecology; Rodent; Biology; Geography; Habitat","score_opus":0.045945779924293384,"score_gpt":0.27199826584906656,"score_spread":0.22605248592477317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625865863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955315,0.0000949152,0.003136466,0.000055479297,0.0000038080339,0.000016656302,0.0004035568,0.000052689447,0.00070497266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965527,0.00006300114,0.0025144932,0.000006619767,0.0000016457078,0.000007688223,0.00037739633,0.000006561227,0.00046984176],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985135,0.000033022443,0.000007057998,0.00004523932,0.000025025258,0.00003826895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996183,0.00014521199,0.00009884961,0.000023618259,0.00007612188,0.000037807145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004269748,0.00034445725,0.00024418344,0.0005557786,0.0002597341,0.00079482084,0.0006749301,0.00032816883,0.0008489734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010733814,0.00019561259,0.00040844455,0.00046447862,0.00023742241,0.00027205292,0.00040891266,0.00020351505,0.00010245957],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026401115,0.00014225731,0.47348413,0.00005601589,0.000159009,0.00022121028,0.0001316349,0.50721335,0.002644526,0.00054643606,0.00035233021,0.014785115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000126058785,0.00012078622,0.14996512,0.000008570823,0.00005104918,0.000055332515,0.00033277267,0.8479641,0.00052367616,0.00026657074,0.00068367895,0.000015777317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41170394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4745048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41170394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013764158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015187272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81861514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W264085230","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.016","title":"Climate change modifies risk of global biodiversity loss due to land-cover change","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":300,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Global Institute for Water Security","funders":"Australian Research Council; Queensland Government; Australian Government; Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Australian Research Council","keywords":"Climate change; Biodiversity; Land cover; Land use, land-use change and forestry; Habitat destruction; Global change; Environmental resource management; Environmental change; Effects of global warming; Global warming; Land use; Habitat; Geography; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.1686409134940137,"score_gpt":0.27912288176162753,"score_spread":0.11048196826761383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W264085230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938607,0.0003380763,0.0006592677,0.00040760383,0.000021029506,0.000006018806,0.0003788368,0.000019119956,0.0043093874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995183,0.000089537025,0.000072190174,0.000023649276,0.000008881842,0.0000010009518,0.000070911876,0.0000033100011,0.00021220322],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967885,0.00011077228,0.000021883257,0.00006718185,0.00004114561,0.00008013477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989889,0.00020968888,0.00047238395,0.00011064865,0.00008671637,0.0001316062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050828076,0.00015857739,0.00018803682,0.0007355977,0.00024173726,0.0009024187,0.00021958794,0.0005054084,0.0048609683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024842918,0.0001412095,0.0004289289,0.0006794902,0.00043129755,0.0008188983,0.00064721133,0.00030600172,0.00029751877],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027394548,0.000071031216,0.9752769,0.00004220502,0.0005012957,0.000263677,0.0001607012,0.008781711,0.0020579998,0.0018293512,0.0005198557,0.010221437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072602406,0.000083924046,0.9903555,0.000009108301,0.00011238775,0.00020197294,0.00027102412,0.0051074526,0.00026001348,0.0022182197,0.0013633837,0.000009798853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052414886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007929216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052414886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048283383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024079205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016261578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754241638","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.08.004","title":"Distinguishing reintroduction from recolonization with genetic testing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fluidigm (Canada); Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Victoria; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Government of Alberta","funders":"Environment Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Royal Canadian Geographical Society; Alberta Environment and Parks; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Biology; Evolutionary biology; Zoology; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.06514497885216944,"score_gpt":0.22425735943110514,"score_spread":0.1591123805789357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754241638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.974113,0.0004595706,0.015025884,0.00024083417,0.00013836182,0.00011615034,0.00062401633,0.00008715634,0.009195042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884417,0.0001826165,0.009462051,0.00025470066,0.000025824953,0.000044231434,0.0003505579,0.000029075733,0.0012092035],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655247,0.0012592609,0.000280233,0.000917348,0.00059016666,0.0004004815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904625,0.0054028286,0.0018150582,0.0010811408,0.00071712874,0.00052140834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044991937,0.0008694051,0.00063949183,0.002679938,0.00084696145,0.0015762893,0.0016555247,0.0017264278,0.0027812608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011818672,0.00026941698,0.0005865496,0.0016704784,0.0026388264,0.0019149173,0.0012894874,0.0011612091,0.0006120644],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009801433,0.00032997064,0.86013716,0.0002880973,0.0004179632,0.00208542,0.0013110896,0.0015855609,0.056709968,0.0039258413,0.0007650315,0.07146373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007946246,0.0012322995,0.88953614,0.00031577717,0.0006368146,0.0066320184,0.004727972,0.01714982,0.058814287,0.01062417,0.01011469,0.00013656178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019031487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069260593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044991937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003813348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004766792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023794293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756258351","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.07.013","title":"Conservation potential of apex predator tourism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Tourism; Wildlife; Apex predator; Outreach; Wildlife conservation; Environmental resource management; Predator; Ecotourism; Wildlife tourism; Environmental planning; Enforcement; Geography; Habitat; Business; Ecology; Predation; Political science; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.031708486017377746,"score_gpt":0.24585704124700025,"score_spread":0.2141485552296225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756258351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96312046,0.00051562756,0.0003676235,0.0005795411,0.000011587025,0.0000065181616,0.00013381193,0.0000074802106,0.035257358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998941,0.00011106865,0.00008030068,0.000013017832,0.000004105727,0.0000010364294,0.000029425071,0.0000012303398,0.0008189326],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997584,0.000060387767,0.000005704793,0.000029172474,0.000045757166,0.000100492965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864954,0.00041183346,0.00014089566,0.00007511512,0.0002899313,0.00043268947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006319712,0.00019098008,0.00023204101,0.0009796913,0.0006580781,0.0025121374,0.00039511878,0.00042468336,0.008982211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021472708,0.00009271649,0.00024703378,0.00070952735,0.0005976477,0.0012507496,0.0010106551,0.00040539692,0.00030436626],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018144642,0.00033426745,0.6937286,0.0003733478,0.0003143421,0.0020944062,0.0018754299,0.019030495,0.007941812,0.08407171,0.0052741943,0.1831469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006859433,0.0008862032,0.8548411,0.00024931002,0.00036172383,0.0027168083,0.011833375,0.04662521,0.0022343178,0.06946192,0.0106502,0.00007122296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072811944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013317095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008982211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012617103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097300735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03004849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780997251","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.11.022","title":"Prioritizing actions for the recovery of endangered species: Emergent insights from Greater Sage-grouse simulation modeling","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada","funders":"Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program; Parks Canada; Environment Canada; University of Washington","keywords":"Population; Endangered species; Habitat; Ecology; Population model; Population viability analysis; Critically endangered; Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science; Demography","score_opus":0.16643797039436545,"score_gpt":0.29419083893413916,"score_spread":0.12775286853977372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780997251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829899,0.00007614262,0.008221529,0.0011355279,0.000015476511,0.000023523813,0.00018279535,0.00004109647,0.0073138713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950701,0.000059036956,0.0037681512,0.00008888915,0.0000058050073,0.00002023833,0.000070924245,0.000017605702,0.00089927216],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955255,0.00026562915,0.000013450414,0.000057792415,0.000040635758,0.00006991955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642533,0.00282466,0.00023732049,0.00011583496,0.0001398152,0.00025700286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014996071,0.00045167602,0.0007601608,0.00044020117,0.0006133783,0.0014739817,0.001138225,0.0012219325,0.0030277055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005835486,0.00027292687,0.0005173085,0.0004887175,0.0007423126,0.0017196696,0.0009612417,0.0011010802,0.00009000627],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001336258,0.00016290533,0.009467241,0.00002785884,0.00006837342,0.000108498265,0.0003515805,0.9751915,0.00048505803,0.009896188,0.0007422845,0.003364795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004182241,0.00005416498,0.001952987,0.0000110961555,0.000034782483,0.00001433965,0.00032312018,0.99110574,0.00012529238,0.005819362,0.0005029212,0.000014447611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060112678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13221128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060112678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016250615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022875008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11952555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781940036","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.021","title":"Is local biodiversity declining or not? A summary of the debate over analysis of species richness time trends","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts; National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center; National Sleep Foundation; Alzheimer Society of B.C.; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Species richness; Argument (complex analysis); Global biodiversity; Geography; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.10247378043226607,"score_gpt":0.28131498612302647,"score_spread":0.1788412056907604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781940036","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006318271,0.66050124,0.006232346,0.30549282,0.008238873,0.00005523416,0.00132472,0.000050106915,0.011786496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0808848,0.81856555,0.008154395,0.06663532,0.019331442,0.00013594098,0.0016329442,0.00007926117,0.0045803604],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99616677,0.0016376799,0.0006171236,0.00066990696,0.00066677487,0.00024162277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95945203,0.030524805,0.002784235,0.00094495754,0.0056476896,0.0006463728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017323295,0.00079306524,0.0013828204,0.0050877696,0.0014893202,0.005108002,0.0020728104,0.0025656023,0.005381619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028132347,0.0003660132,0.0014145419,0.008613104,0.004507509,0.008414799,0.0015740867,0.0053043347,0.0010564447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005390333,0.000107371925,0.020100122,0.015507965,0.00073529925,0.0007750552,0.0046911505,0.001808004,0.001579967,0.11703381,0.23707904,0.6000432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027257762,0.00036432798,0.065021574,0.020054247,0.0007051554,0.0015170355,0.010815461,0.0012452336,0.0006594269,0.11615186,0.7832742,0.00016416899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008825479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019059096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017323295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00375419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033075616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09161544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789856468","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.014","title":"Community assembly and the sustainability of habitat offsetting targets in the first compensation lake in the oil sands region in Alberta, Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Natural Resources; University of Alberta","funders":"Mitacs; Canadian Natural Resources Limited","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Trophic level; Ecosystem; Benthic zone; Geography; Sustainability; Lake ecosystem; Productivity; Biodiversity; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.021988947359857295,"score_gpt":0.2274147365212104,"score_spread":0.2054257891613531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789856468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966813,0.00038239098,0.0001670724,0.00018954239,0.0000071386908,0.000023110242,0.0011185476,0.000013386158,0.0014175627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99659306,0.00023235231,0.00045382392,0.00008469597,0.0000034635614,0.000013763273,0.001172928,0.0000055511155,0.0014403472],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936575,0.000037498052,0.000022537024,0.000102780876,0.000204664,0.00026676676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835014,0.00008383347,0.00022954594,0.000038523092,0.00084800285,0.00045002913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000615929,0.00031531454,0.00039396354,0.002409424,0.003153891,0.0014000149,0.0013458116,0.00038957974,0.0015135262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015069282,0.00030706462,0.0003682609,0.003499485,0.0014459264,0.00045246506,0.0011293095,0.00045318893,0.00017306063],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001075107,0.000051021012,0.97897744,0.00007692043,0.00008389391,0.0002447225,0.0041524284,0.00081610115,0.0013256423,0.00033730533,0.0017622036,0.012064869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047146614,0.0000114579,0.9948672,0.000022622324,0.000014050861,0.00003161697,0.0032986435,0.0006710132,0.00008221061,0.000041704727,0.0009440246,0.0000107651995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99893624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03291501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03291501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029631533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23881626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790329133","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.020","title":"Perils of recovering the Mexican wolf outside of its historical range","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Gray wolf; Subspecies; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Endangered species; Ecology; Canis; Biological dispersal; Population; Ethnology; Habitat; Biology; Demography; History","score_opus":0.054248731563149084,"score_gpt":0.24026745910153344,"score_spread":0.18601872753838436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790329133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85541296,0.004765491,0.0086471075,0.058297254,0.0008513838,0.0005044556,0.00037033053,0.0002595861,0.07089144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96683484,0.0034395298,0.009152877,0.008169217,0.00045116036,0.00028931373,0.00046370327,0.000044246048,0.011155114],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821377,0.00066667853,0.00010024512,0.00014719824,0.00034762136,0.00052461756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967277,0.00045429298,0.0007695747,0.0004808448,0.0007002849,0.000867255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035633233,0.00035783218,0.00021980537,0.0006888634,0.003433216,0.0016010962,0.0013598436,0.0013553706,0.0037261206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008139123,0.0001694812,0.00037747182,0.00034062803,0.0010196941,0.0015040268,0.0023683908,0.001775853,0.0005357292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000396641,0.0014976028,0.2669298,0.00055315054,0.00021120459,0.0040284046,0.0061642122,0.003992052,0.007313494,0.012715259,0.054404035,0.6417942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008914646,0.003247533,0.60612404,0.0023967307,0.00028319773,0.006058676,0.03811306,0.005840013,0.007235229,0.014159177,0.31632382,0.00012942696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008611622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04645958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008611622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010481636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00264567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018844903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793661659","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.010","title":"Missing native oyster (Ostrea edulis L.) beds in a European Marine Protected Area: Should there be widespread restorative management?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University Belfast; Queen's University; Scottish Funding Council; Marine Alliance for Science and Technology for Scotland; Heriot-Watt University","keywords":"Marine protected area; Oyster; Ostrea edulis; Fishery; Geography; Habitat; Marine habitats; Oceanography; Ecology; Biology; Geology","score_opus":0.08087597482161094,"score_gpt":0.28537381006064744,"score_spread":0.2044978352390365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793661659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9720825,0.025872247,0.00023246014,0.00033326712,0.00002243288,0.000012868489,0.00026603384,0.0000054343823,0.0011727479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868701,0.011840994,0.00042484127,0.0002503322,0.00002173465,0.000007556264,0.0003418713,0.000001691824,0.00024090013],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954396,0.00012089026,0.00011798279,0.000099478035,0.000079530604,0.000038252587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775034,0.00079275126,0.0010591374,0.00010275252,0.00019294543,0.00010203284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014180426,0.000114728275,0.00019997418,0.0013100716,0.0002488787,0.00071627507,0.00028826983,0.00031334657,0.00037688302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026062303,0.00008211399,0.00019843133,0.0014504989,0.00056078157,0.00068277965,0.00038024902,0.0001341382,0.00004740499],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015347924,0.000047100482,0.8673721,0.001971608,0.00016404242,0.0012812741,0.0014788219,0.00013564143,0.0017724448,0.00022084828,0.00072664896,0.12467592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034151435,0.000088209854,0.9896199,0.00068009994,0.000104855644,0.00073825446,0.0031029107,0.0000821374,0.00019241813,0.000061367995,0.005321278,0.000005173811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009833179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029921241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009833179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036564126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006857318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019551873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793688915","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.02.007","title":"Forecasting the outcome of multiple effects of climate change on northern common eiders","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Windsor","funders":"Liber Ero Foundation; W. Garfield Weston Foundation; University of Windsor; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Mitacs; Carleton University; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Pew Charitable Trusts","keywords":"Eider; Climate change; Population; Ecology; Arctic; Wildlife; Avian clutch size; Biodiversity; Population size; Geography; Biology; Reproduction","score_opus":0.14380152268559337,"score_gpt":0.286762963364661,"score_spread":0.14296144067906763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793688915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904455,0.0006116974,0.0036982982,0.0013061684,0.00015616405,0.00002416988,0.00093287486,0.00007440396,0.0027507136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962459,0.0004893964,0.0018554714,0.00006582283,0.000052089865,0.00001572317,0.00064789027,0.000011835603,0.0006157388],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996438,0.00009266739,0.00002426425,0.00009670102,0.000058833306,0.00008360766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985575,0.00064141495,0.0002992378,0.00008773303,0.00024254683,0.00017153607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022405782,0.0006121992,0.00043024422,0.0006459589,0.00034191937,0.0011668813,0.00064312574,0.001417915,0.0011034849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004232906,0.00035751742,0.00067059364,0.0008786208,0.00045423448,0.0015921807,0.00079160207,0.0010217845,0.00013647796],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005065525,0.00014264551,0.35303393,0.00013019807,0.00037925935,0.0003639881,0.00014887446,0.6043052,0.00264076,0.0017920848,0.003038172,0.033518497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005816719,0.00018764855,0.2412763,0.000053531778,0.00020647426,0.00005693463,0.0007511918,0.74894726,0.0017451814,0.0040702526,0.002592279,0.000054754233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054697555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093285814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054697555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015842166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009317301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10875833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799490002","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.029","title":"The threats endangering Australia's at-risk fauna","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Australian Research Council","keywords":"Threatened species; Fauna; Ecology; Habitat; Conservation-dependent species; Climate change; Near-threatened species; Biodiversity; Biology; Range (aeronautics); Umbrella species; Habitat destruction; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Species distribution; Geography","score_opus":0.13407824290013687,"score_gpt":0.307371809264064,"score_spread":0.17329356636392712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799490002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93265927,0.0029038752,0.00075693586,0.012221506,0.00020882017,0.000016933149,0.00040297597,0.000020022784,0.050809663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910392,0.0013514175,0.00034738085,0.0006678521,0.0000880059,0.000007635785,0.00007832776,0.0000046331534,0.0064155604],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981993,0.000039279726,0.000006353141,0.000015270654,0.00006270798,0.000056473116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989967,0.000081424754,0.00029907093,0.000026836748,0.0002483818,0.00034761458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045788038,0.00014104627,0.00007830412,0.0006468974,0.0010228826,0.0007766108,0.00021141536,0.00045767266,0.0044133007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020645729,0.0000955462,0.000084162646,0.00044575345,0.00082422607,0.00090898713,0.0009559331,0.0007394183,0.00025962936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012775077,0.0001254422,0.67561126,0.0003840483,0.00014521937,0.0013269247,0.01055273,0.0025960011,0.004850082,0.024591822,0.03582072,0.24386804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026653024,0.00006247121,0.948686,0.00011002503,0.000019711337,0.00042135012,0.0036435598,0.0011399928,0.0001321274,0.005090896,0.040680926,0.000010221485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07964428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23745167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07964428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013036509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015551279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15836138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884062404","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.033","title":"Consequences of captive breeding: Fitness implications for wild-origin, hatchery-spawned Atlantic salmon kelts upon their return to the wild","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Dalhousie University; Ocean Tracking Network; University of Prince Edward Island; Cape Breton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation; Cape Breton University","keywords":"Hatchery; Fishery; Salmo; Biology; Broodstock; Fecundity; Semelparity and iteroparity; Captive breeding; Endangered species; Range (aeronautics); Zoology; Ecology; Aquaculture; Life history; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Population; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.07752344703875401,"score_gpt":0.28337858234819224,"score_spread":0.20585513530943822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884062404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999057,0.000055554257,0.000028565672,0.00010740641,0.000010210136,0.000001940229,0.00005366714,0.0000015228378,0.00068420614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999225,0.00003548976,0.000029157187,0.00005169849,0.0000070551646,0.0000031081486,0.000061559804,0.0000017191563,0.00058518216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998357,0.0000578336,0.000011817304,0.000025705192,0.000019304845,0.000049646867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894863,0.00023396539,0.00022549037,0.00008028889,0.00014663622,0.000365017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006608617,0.00021505437,0.00018217805,0.00030995143,0.00069538347,0.00079931505,0.00043679448,0.0006719797,0.0059321607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020853342,0.00010509071,0.00031661525,0.00020457184,0.00059383607,0.0005519823,0.0005038341,0.00057399017,0.00046686298],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023952504,0.0010841058,0.95451975,0.000046379897,0.00019249838,0.002431374,0.00066369673,0.0011039034,0.017363228,0.00052165193,0.00093016156,0.018747898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008198768,0.00052284094,0.99731076,0.0000063239754,0.000040802766,0.0003360743,0.0007640155,0.00026526328,0.00045524177,0.00010811342,0.0001763822,0.000006011736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053112274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01832349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059321607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043917596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003046859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019845009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884266673","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.022","title":"Is habitat fragmentation good for biodiversity?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":725,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Liber Ero Foundation; Natural Environment Research Council; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Sight Research UK; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Habitat fragmentation; Habitat; Habitat destruction; Biodiversity; Fragmentation (computing); Ecology; Geography; Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.05068446110587485,"score_gpt":0.27090279169314246,"score_spread":0.2202183305872676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884266673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90922016,0.012155308,0.0015625671,0.040800143,0.00051757845,0.000024674713,0.0006703615,0.000025331889,0.03502394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99743974,0.0009360672,0.00017265664,0.00083170756,0.00022363404,0.0000048875,0.000070304304,0.000005103426,0.0003158974],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987538,0.00049742236,0.0000734873,0.00020401597,0.00021241899,0.00025896283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98050755,0.008059214,0.0062822136,0.0015599827,0.0015127946,0.0020781197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032100086,0.00026520755,0.0006922833,0.0016067246,0.000972046,0.0023955032,0.0006494413,0.0015812702,0.00839543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017703904,0.00024101001,0.00040185705,0.001913568,0.0054858914,0.004241738,0.0010450324,0.0009231991,0.00032526057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035472613,0.00012232736,0.9247927,0.00027018576,0.00066851464,0.00038736445,0.0010288833,0.00049988896,0.00043255722,0.010540955,0.004108637,0.056793164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026810438,0.00016947498,0.9601885,0.0002491038,0.00015327896,0.0007776995,0.004110703,0.00037251553,0.00016956551,0.027874857,0.00588539,0.000022065235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039336374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008622613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00839543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001007368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006116075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02808553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887624227","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.012","title":"Mapping relative extinction risk for biodiversity conservation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Endemism; Biodiversity; Taxon; Ecology; Phylogenetic diversity; Geography; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Phylogenetic tree; Taxonomic rank; Biology; Species diversity; Biodiversity hotspot","score_opus":0.05401210731511106,"score_gpt":0.2505131617290045,"score_spread":0.19650105441389346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887624227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9360684,0.0011738088,0.055334527,0.00030936228,0.000023797222,0.000038527072,0.00073702354,0.00019521228,0.006119407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98585606,0.00018247782,0.013248327,0.000013132578,0.000008784399,0.000015193794,0.00024405893,0.000020928679,0.00041100252],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993773,0.00031061363,0.000030781262,0.00012552773,0.0001082512,0.000047498732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968263,0.0020730603,0.00047266806,0.00032928487,0.00018891755,0.000109741886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020930704,0.0004702624,0.00044180642,0.0036707122,0.00051475415,0.0012272934,0.00056875125,0.0004557636,0.0031017074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008995498,0.0002585435,0.0004551892,0.0019152306,0.0004382816,0.0021569622,0.0007947762,0.00056631706,0.0002561251],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007124846,0.00034537428,0.56354094,0.00024528123,0.0008644883,0.00028596405,0.0006823528,0.13185415,0.008068287,0.01788331,0.0021601007,0.2733573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052870575,0.0005340253,0.42030767,0.00013065618,0.00039112105,0.001558584,0.0014347563,0.47717518,0.003594587,0.08986837,0.0048570423,0.00009513001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031253356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031356523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036707122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000598077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003281566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011069357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889904364","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.027","title":"Research advances and gaps in marine planning: towards a global database in systematic conservation planning","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Documentation; Marine conservation; Threatened species; Environmental resource management; Best practice; Environmental planning; Systematic review; Marine protected area; Computer science; Data science; Geography; Business; Ecology; Environmental science; Habitat; Political science; MEDLINE; Biology","score_opus":0.12361387301681934,"score_gpt":0.36738838035407173,"score_spread":0.2437745073372524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889904364","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07289051,0.20843193,0.15642828,0.42586556,0.004225824,0.0012468327,0.040034775,0.0014862968,0.089390025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45956504,0.17771606,0.291971,0.017068015,0.001440903,0.0020455616,0.04527679,0.00041256627,0.004504038],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97247565,0.012909243,0.0070548924,0.0020175762,0.004670953,0.0008715813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.698209,0.16031298,0.023253988,0.048071396,0.05637566,0.01377701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.091382734,0.0008833973,0.002024024,0.026704388,0.0027247975,0.011831215,0.0065773283,0.0027362744,0.010743901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20728442,0.0009707905,0.000868089,0.04310552,0.004958303,0.01962343,0.0109507935,0.0041201906,0.0013072797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113998125,0.00021502023,0.051961116,0.0075843413,0.00028924563,0.00024390304,0.0073991003,0.0051068673,0.0005475309,0.10493134,0.076918885,0.7446886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041921365,0.00018083976,0.061352592,0.033067096,0.00050437043,0.00040846644,0.028994499,0.006726835,0.00077568664,0.19726257,0.67047495,0.00021019994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048384942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06810681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091382734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010010786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.076961145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48328388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890665403","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.09.008","title":"Survey-based assessment of the frequency and potential impacts of recreation on polar bears","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Nunavut Research Institute; Government of Nunavut","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Ursus maritimus; Recreation; Visitor pattern; Arctic; Sea ice; Geography; Habitat; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.0567808071692044,"score_gpt":0.2925742690140691,"score_spread":0.23579346184486466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890665403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99430484,0.0014325485,0.00092398695,0.00009854911,0.000009240821,0.000030486903,0.0009598035,0.00000776166,0.0022327215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99439055,0.0022835191,0.0012575812,0.000038476643,0.000025330668,0.0000311522,0.0012710104,0.0000022413399,0.00070015027],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942696,0.0002679573,0.000038442213,0.000085780724,0.00012000626,0.000060873193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895406,0.00029001388,0.0003565365,0.00007172039,0.00027228415,0.000055368706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017996219,0.00028210023,0.0001372304,0.0013540838,0.00024352293,0.0004779427,0.00026991038,0.0002718745,0.00071630505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015927464,0.00014801578,0.00030444024,0.0013897305,0.00023664089,0.0005120751,0.0005978212,0.00016192564,0.00011697187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012794923,0.00007021505,0.96758366,0.00010087409,0.00019938624,0.000038798444,0.00040023722,0.0013281297,0.0011308081,0.00015955554,0.00032385008,0.028536387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001705792,0.0001109726,0.9973683,0.000031869895,0.000049818278,0.000043491662,0.000678121,0.0006416064,0.00022597707,0.000055499135,0.00078876875,0.0000038364474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01394544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04572912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01394544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003614832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033479108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027728498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894607922","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.09.026","title":"A fence runs through it: A call for greater attention to the influence of fences on wildlife and ecosystems","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":196,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Conservation Association","funders":"","keywords":"Fencing; Wildlife; Fence (mathematics); Environmental resource management; Wildlife conservation; Ecosystem; Empirical evidence; Wildlife management; Geography; Environmental planning; Business; Ecology; Environmental science; Engineering; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.048044943536522174,"score_gpt":0.2689493773537956,"score_spread":0.22090443381727343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894607922","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020773586,0.030901687,0.0062317606,0.89182985,0.009865933,0.000025543502,0.00013575531,0.00014415373,0.040091738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4513649,0.06753916,0.019555237,0.4034061,0.01866415,0.00012550568,0.00019618271,0.0004877223,0.038660947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997139,0.0009565377,0.00011627565,0.00044537405,0.0008556333,0.00048725816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873203,0.0052111764,0.001248745,0.00089850964,0.0028328015,0.0024884827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055180043,0.00072630646,0.0010445606,0.0011769442,0.009854652,0.01273754,0.003478854,0.018760659,0.034554683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013272926,0.0003932862,0.0009885945,0.0016725885,0.016020417,0.018060572,0.0048409025,0.009985757,0.002112423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020275489,0.0001142361,0.01693787,0.0012147974,0.00008006049,0.002605316,0.015313551,0.0011141581,0.0025473873,0.10610208,0.54043263,0.31333518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008531898,0.000055046294,0.008636966,0.001693392,0.00003241682,0.0013981881,0.038658552,0.00035016178,0.0003715464,0.045532893,0.9031447,0.000117627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032475594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.118860304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034554683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037884223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009221111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11559695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899914305","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.10.016","title":"Distributional shifts in a biodiversity hotspot","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity hotspot; Hotspot (geology); Biodiversity; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Geology","score_opus":0.07863280051016845,"score_gpt":0.2591086841078112,"score_spread":0.18047588359764272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899914305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978593,0.00007074619,0.0001293744,0.00011950694,0.0000068295153,0.0000028861648,0.0000922369,0.00000420441,0.0017149454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961936,0.000024950352,0.00009126225,0.00001969022,0.000007646426,0.0000025730617,0.00005901686,0.0000014800643,0.0001740345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997899,0.0000512783,0.000013307893,0.000055134016,0.000027696648,0.000062702624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920446,0.00011956662,0.00022339476,0.000054900316,0.0001566393,0.0002411779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036110418,0.00007632174,0.00019738235,0.0014769778,0.0008617928,0.00070399896,0.00031487955,0.00031335614,0.0056397584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014462728,0.00009240774,0.00012313576,0.0012665169,0.0007566671,0.00086603675,0.0012666344,0.00032784767,0.00023975543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065116264,0.000121399426,0.9400752,0.000087801374,0.0001160624,0.0004164103,0.0037037411,0.0011355762,0.017086023,0.0041749147,0.0016760576,0.03075559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057368843,0.00004893402,0.9942637,0.000006975528,0.000010201249,0.00025172133,0.002436434,0.00041296388,0.00021844788,0.0010003644,0.0013391029,0.000005320354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003487913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012747859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056397584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060127553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022955485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018866897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907399367","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.12.026","title":"Is habitat fragmentation bad for biodiversity?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":587,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Concordia University; ELUTIS Modelling and Consulting (Canada); University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa; Université de Sherbrooke; Okanagan University College; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Carleton University; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Habitat fragmentation; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat; Ecology; Biodiversity; Geography; Species richness; Habitat destruction; Extinction debt; Forest fragmentation; Landscape ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.05037802176210701,"score_gpt":0.27314630517010985,"score_spread":0.22276828340800284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907399367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83894706,0.022114852,0.0009836741,0.112441674,0.0010725737,0.000020411544,0.0008975416,0.000030953037,0.023491338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927249,0.0027273102,0.00016927448,0.0031996183,0.0005203728,0.000005733634,0.00014039666,0.000007797466,0.00050462823],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989741,0.00040738817,0.00007307157,0.00016603115,0.00017535497,0.00020405397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842881,0.0053819283,0.0052616647,0.0011389327,0.0018842575,0.002045072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002791374,0.00023412824,0.0005809728,0.0016121446,0.000969302,0.0019569937,0.0006375646,0.0016758068,0.0070237215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017350184,0.000246788,0.00039590205,0.0017400931,0.00436261,0.0034732793,0.001137877,0.0012478586,0.00045546697],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002470805,0.00007846426,0.92343724,0.00016468405,0.00054673787,0.00028630014,0.0007449362,0.0002667486,0.0001760236,0.0042605167,0.007109373,0.062682025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021428552,0.00011837091,0.9711981,0.00030021602,0.00016110191,0.0007371118,0.004536232,0.0002655676,0.00007528319,0.01612607,0.0064423718,0.000018129827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007969113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014020154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007969113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083422015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069085445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023496687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908086122","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.11.022","title":"Value-oriented criteria, indicators and targets for conservation and production: A multi-party approach to forest management planning","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Sustainable forest management; Environmental resource management; Forest management; Environmental planning; Sustainable management; Business; Sustainable development; Land use; Sustainability; Land-use planning; Geography; Ecology; Forestry; Environmental science","score_opus":0.05161734864685886,"score_gpt":0.2642102603397325,"score_spread":0.21259291169287364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908086122","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024635268,0.0015000139,0.9211359,0.0053349826,0.0001610092,0.0005316246,0.0002714408,0.00010185809,0.046327863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6380677,0.001308955,0.35345155,0.00034993023,0.00019276924,0.000843344,0.00021150005,0.000089488676,0.005484761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860454,0.009267809,0.0005532616,0.00056051457,0.003014898,0.0005580522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99220157,0.0048815627,0.00077898946,0.00048493026,0.0011805589,0.00047238098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015880281,0.0012098997,0.0016354644,0.0083698835,0.0026669442,0.008891145,0.0023499876,0.002420574,0.0036145137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020409264,0.0010227243,0.001353927,0.007934792,0.004736792,0.007232185,0.004502723,0.0030655493,0.00029650953],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009848212,0.00023788383,0.0036206336,0.0003328131,0.00021071038,0.00029760032,0.0012784039,0.15462197,0.0010353404,0.7160356,0.004623088,0.11760743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015943204,0.00007767389,0.002038925,0.00021311945,0.00005813607,0.00008409531,0.0010302811,0.10543797,0.0004119578,0.88198745,0.008586589,0.00005786018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056013125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011796644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015880281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005631128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006030915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08398396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912285194","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.013","title":"Why we must question the militarisation of conservation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":361,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; Economic and Social Research Council; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; University of Sheffield; UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Poaching; Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Wildlife conservation; Politics; Political science; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Geography; Criminology; Ecology; Law; Economics; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.11252663087559228,"score_gpt":0.3086534341648529,"score_spread":0.19612680328926063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912285194","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000058784513,0.9907046,0.000060172293,0.0073558404,0.0008792239,0.0000011637246,0.0000039669467,0.000002953787,0.00093334896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029450082,0.98818505,0.00019065953,0.0064160796,0.0013014193,0.00000718243,0.000016264197,0.00000697498,0.0009313558],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978877,0.00084180705,0.00016979688,0.0003128247,0.00060679915,0.00018111365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994418,0.003894538,0.0003568718,0.00017520816,0.00095998787,0.00019546294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036027264,0.0007360118,0.001413894,0.0027804065,0.0011482374,0.0045478535,0.0018192097,0.0051504304,0.0034520698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008481513,0.00037850492,0.00068848045,0.0033530819,0.0067289877,0.00982851,0.0017995748,0.007258475,0.0012761938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006670441,0.00004210952,0.0003344545,0.029267466,0.00016225745,0.00021017507,0.002555458,0.0004163517,0.00059411954,0.12751217,0.17936142,0.6594773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061093474,0.000014658456,0.00041500817,0.013764655,0.0000351511,0.00023999481,0.0012161679,0.000039337643,0.00006872046,0.020743916,0.96344125,0.000015014245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072009163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009211663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072009163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002974652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059381723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021582782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912641801","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.011","title":"Chasing the light: Positive bias in camera-based surveys of groundfish examined as risk-foraging trade-offs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Tula Foundation; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation","keywords":"Foraging; Groundfish; Ecology; Geography; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.0421467027460893,"score_gpt":0.24181382725496295,"score_spread":0.19966712450887364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912641801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99781835,0.00018610824,0.0006082595,0.000040677172,0.000009589122,0.0000086029395,0.000073550786,0.0000060158977,0.001248882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993061,0.000047707894,0.00035402767,0.00003505198,0.000005307741,0.0000057992215,0.00005184884,0.0000030570855,0.00019108216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976544,0.0012965531,0.0001915515,0.00028724427,0.00038704602,0.00018321515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882697,0.0063414373,0.0034737573,0.00063730025,0.00089369423,0.00038410508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032965138,0.000255057,0.00023974698,0.0011367054,0.00026951975,0.00077158655,0.00036806733,0.00066399435,0.0015692292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015837735,0.00016355295,0.00036522825,0.000612997,0.00039055938,0.0005464796,0.0005009875,0.00031252284,0.00021696278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018600562,0.00001632921,0.99304765,0.000021654838,0.00007675037,0.000033184977,0.00015123721,0.00009543834,0.001455059,0.00005013215,0.000058092675,0.0048084175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041861103,0.00008321641,0.99773186,0.000016040207,0.00007535843,0.0002570428,0.00043473215,0.0005954399,0.00056848227,0.00008854667,0.00014011473,0.000005095266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00511304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017967883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00511304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031672517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002652045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017433822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917282631","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.02.026","title":"Synthesizing expert opinion to assess the at-sea risks to seabirds in the western North Atlantic","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Birds Canada; Mount Allison University","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Mount Allison University; Bird Studies Canada","keywords":"Bycatch; Fishery; Environmental science; Seabird; Endangered species; Analytic hierarchy process; Marine conservation; Marine debris; Stakeholder; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Debris; Operations research; Habitat; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Engineering; Predation","score_opus":0.1576848386678766,"score_gpt":0.3314500327654894,"score_spread":0.1737651940976128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917282631","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2993948,0.2347546,0.014629393,0.35135886,0.021270758,0.002348149,0.01253913,0.00008870167,0.06361557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83100927,0.082109444,0.019609805,0.054746382,0.006031372,0.00093251315,0.0034582561,0.000042233143,0.0020607265],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96286356,0.015747834,0.011815924,0.0017288562,0.006929976,0.0009138029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6215007,0.27463466,0.025335528,0.004298586,0.06933742,0.004893152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06416019,0.0004215538,0.0008557421,0.007884335,0.0013280306,0.0035405145,0.0016365274,0.0033298528,0.0031242128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25210613,0.00038199426,0.0011780484,0.0035101103,0.001376336,0.0024994153,0.0022559597,0.0022178718,0.00042792875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008165152,0.00038248734,0.13273676,0.06699109,0.005767142,0.0016984198,0.03736182,0.0021940104,0.0034410357,0.0039704214,0.17042364,0.57421666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038287792,0.0005397591,0.20116876,0.23362538,0.008769292,0.0010822699,0.09349491,0.0040962384,0.0023546384,0.015943572,0.43818316,0.00035920917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018838465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051834825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98116153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039539533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013321537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3393156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922247702","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.03.017","title":"Beyond protected areas: Private lands and public policy anchor intact pathways for multi-species wildlife migration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Conservation Association","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management; Ministry of Environment - Saskatchewan; World Wildlife Fund; Parks Canada; Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks","keywords":"Geography; Wildlife; Habitat; Ecology; Wildlife conservation; Habitat conservation; Agroforestry; Biology","score_opus":0.05850199901393208,"score_gpt":0.24895364054536986,"score_spread":0.1904516415314378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922247702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24177603,0.0012355756,0.021454666,0.08593516,0.00075165054,0.0002570642,0.0003140301,0.00035479615,0.6479211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97023463,0.00033053552,0.0037618116,0.0028701678,0.00011340929,0.00010148091,0.000079430865,0.00006847277,0.022439992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979406,0.00051631377,0.00005398054,0.00019779809,0.0003020433,0.0009892394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99403113,0.0012135169,0.00068174355,0.0008438641,0.000764762,0.0024649627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003111186,0.00021605488,0.00030227145,0.0011833158,0.0040586414,0.014386481,0.0013743999,0.004325146,0.046021327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009213962,0.00037010087,0.00035522063,0.0008740616,0.0074953306,0.014066788,0.011054683,0.0039118105,0.0031446142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014676401,0.00034656975,0.01463651,0.00013561147,0.00002860211,0.0002453549,0.0044790413,0.0015949158,0.0008913882,0.83465636,0.031104187,0.1117347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078745055,0.00021268445,0.03257279,0.0008473835,0.000059454964,0.00021202081,0.026917506,0.0022789375,0.00063364574,0.65702546,0.27909833,0.00006306787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008733735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03426305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046021327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034386609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015113705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15395665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2925086066","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.03.021","title":"Reciprocity in restoration ecology: When might large carnivore reintroduction restore ecosystems?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mesopredator release hypothesis; Carnivore; Apex predator; Predation; Trophic cascade; Ecology; Predator; Biology; Trophic level; Herbivore; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Ecosystem","score_opus":0.01915177669694073,"score_gpt":0.22124132433036584,"score_spread":0.2020895476334251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2925086066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7092363,0.014244555,0.0043429933,0.21768655,0.0009950016,0.000064449705,0.000098797194,0.00005689142,0.053274453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944543,0.0014007217,0.0006693018,0.0017642636,0.00018780719,0.000025493166,0.000011309978,0.00000732649,0.001479447],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842656,0.0010194714,0.000033594162,0.00012294095,0.00009034338,0.0003071688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923234,0.0025973318,0.0011139538,0.00043925885,0.0008786282,0.0026474688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008036449,0.00016960294,0.00040807461,0.0003136338,0.0012416614,0.0023163224,0.00065305765,0.0020795292,0.008072187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01510514,0.00014999564,0.00021756602,0.00021913908,0.0052731866,0.0035923668,0.0014386531,0.0019152408,0.0004410044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014807103,0.0012956943,0.28427756,0.00081639265,0.0003259222,0.0011947496,0.015368469,0.003389328,0.0029324412,0.21464542,0.061936144,0.4123371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024852218,0.00090714067,0.44004256,0.002064437,0.0003150673,0.0015577275,0.07642643,0.008769034,0.00084806775,0.326971,0.14167333,0.00017673084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044281636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015762627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008072187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017002505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027774666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04250133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937117517","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.03.028","title":"Top 100 research questions for biodiversity conservation in Southeast Asia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Mundipharma Pte Ltd; Directorate for Biological Sciences; National University of Singapore","keywords":"Biodiversity; Threatened species; Sustainability; Environmental planning; Wildlife; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecosystem services; Habitat destruction; Ecosystem; Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.10729587113232034,"score_gpt":0.29713419942137287,"score_spread":0.18983832828905253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937117517","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07537823,0.42853287,0.0021994081,0.26993316,0.0070380084,0.00025646016,0.005081024,0.00029829788,0.2112825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5488114,0.34608397,0.008820374,0.03802398,0.0095116785,0.00044666854,0.0049566454,0.00016334427,0.043182008],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980629,0.0006127853,0.00017055709,0.00019315447,0.0005367764,0.00042367232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99009854,0.004052854,0.0008150742,0.0005107725,0.0022526218,0.0022701875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006417981,0.00088103936,0.0011331614,0.0041995766,0.0030937893,0.011816584,0.0011960753,0.002347154,0.0236027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00988726,0.00043710246,0.00074088894,0.00847617,0.0032684603,0.0062398217,0.002962088,0.0026295972,0.0028771688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046093544,0.00019502164,0.046258375,0.006270381,0.00022684736,0.00082099903,0.003711885,0.0010985142,0.0020706037,0.04817899,0.21822396,0.6724835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010851596,0.00023122029,0.08974338,0.008307755,0.00045148024,0.0006419748,0.025418712,0.0009162337,0.0012455176,0.100445434,0.7724051,0.00008464904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009444025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01833491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0236027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004731429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012382238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07895887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947404325","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.029","title":"Conserving Panamanian harlequin frogs by integrating captive-breeding and research programs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Environmental Biology; First Quantum Minerals; Mohammed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund; Smithsonian Institution; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; IUCN Red List; Captive breeding; Conservation status; Endangered species; Zoology; Ecology; Fishery; Habitat","score_opus":0.07799064774433664,"score_gpt":0.29521307663450214,"score_spread":0.2172224288901655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947404325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9717154,0.0018244726,0.005263609,0.0032739188,0.00012919329,0.00022918946,0.000088375826,0.00015988684,0.017315982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870113,0.00058700773,0.0092936205,0.0006762374,0.00008057086,0.00011576839,0.000105822684,0.000014820896,0.002114858],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951994,0.00020652662,0.00001539131,0.000076886645,0.000072553616,0.00010871828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988096,0.00015742276,0.00026012733,0.00012141056,0.00021552567,0.00043590894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001995098,0.00020341997,0.00013765805,0.00078186847,0.0009489756,0.0009718863,0.0012478282,0.00035174112,0.0025736087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014239997,0.00012360502,0.00014414628,0.000488968,0.0007036193,0.00082484476,0.0013399138,0.000316765,0.00014494543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002037111,0.0017514115,0.51385427,0.00032199363,0.00022820511,0.00038091125,0.0028841065,0.0020983121,0.026262674,0.0040715463,0.004416897,0.44352603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007408782,0.0011381168,0.94823873,0.00015545469,0.00021768291,0.00046200765,0.005520377,0.002942017,0.0023780449,0.0020378602,0.036808494,0.000027066733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009364653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04305456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009364653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006111495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025041527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018620312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950774616","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.003","title":"Assessing the vulnerability of Africa's freshwater fishes to climate change: A continent-wide trait-based analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Geography; Climate change; Endangered species; Freshwater ecosystem; Ecology; IUCN Red List; Biodiversity; Environmental change; Freshwater fish; Habitat; Fishery; Biology; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.10433942968833598,"score_gpt":0.30574947389152,"score_spread":0.20141004420318404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950774616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994862,0.000042327883,0.00026950092,0.000016800283,8.507504e-7,0.0000014387094,0.00010632636,0.0000023730693,0.00007425347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994886,0.000023479377,0.00031040804,0.000006221048,0.0000011633375,0.0000024867122,0.00013200557,0.0000017797444,0.000033884287],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999648,0.00013874286,0.000018077777,0.00009289872,0.000028643393,0.00007363788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991487,0.0003959905,0.00021725561,0.00008988209,0.00007815662,0.00007004591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011196182,0.00042861866,0.00028989348,0.0016212551,0.00055549876,0.00054086954,0.00030722332,0.00034131276,0.000976096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002069357,0.00013299982,0.0007162457,0.0019866733,0.00049826986,0.00036179935,0.00079589756,0.00033086925,0.00007814157],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012025687,0.000017012417,0.9866172,0.000022483562,0.00070633064,0.00010914357,0.0003680162,0.0020243102,0.002981318,0.00016211276,0.00008851031,0.006783368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003821237,0.000042597465,0.9959325,0.000006200026,0.00014048781,0.00008801653,0.00054429343,0.0027274003,0.00017712505,0.00012175147,0.00020977607,0.0000059866825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015854137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020672167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015854137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038954595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036956495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031523764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953772174","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.010","title":"Sensitivity of biodiversity indices to life history stage, habitat type and landscape in Odonata community","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Odonata; Biodiversity; Ecology; Habitat; River ecosystem; Species richness; Wetland; Dragonfly; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.05566008979841956,"score_gpt":0.21018346931899723,"score_spread":0.15452337952057765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953772174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997539,0.00001193621,0.000010236178,0.0000033053077,5.8088256e-7,9.869703e-7,0.00001824267,4.2816734e-7,0.00020034213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999652,0.000014301152,0.000026929085,0.000005776078,6.167992e-7,0.0000027372976,0.000053631957,6.154877e-7,0.00024329528],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998429,0.000020815422,0.0000121005605,0.000051883228,0.00002145476,0.00005081299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929535,0.00013160113,0.00018869499,0.000032485797,0.000109250155,0.00024263254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024746518,0.00014988484,0.00020353873,0.0008916508,0.00069668365,0.00066401873,0.00027504956,0.00017409622,0.0016800882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011126058,0.00018404587,0.00017122719,0.0005061506,0.00054685946,0.000331686,0.0009544939,0.000275392,0.00013514294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016774035,0.00006355198,0.98689085,0.000015001022,0.000042715026,0.00009386777,0.002035237,0.00011212292,0.00680625,0.000115696756,0.000054657325,0.0036021618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011298014,0.00002059563,0.99865377,0.0000023775076,0.0000066343437,0.00003093457,0.0009740134,0.00011477213,0.000078992314,0.000025204397,0.00008975569,0.0000017377455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03524432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17445274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03524432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006931666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041453616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07007831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955288754","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.017","title":"Factors affecting feelings of justice in biodiversity conflicts: Toward fairer jaguar management in Calakmul, Mexico","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Mitacs; Université de Sherbrooke","keywords":"Injustice; Feeling; Economic Justice; Perception; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Environmental resource management; Psychology; Geography; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05555421959256631,"score_gpt":0.2474822011168061,"score_spread":0.1919279815242398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955288754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99858415,0.000028068318,0.000012371308,0.00043194837,0.00000496013,0.000003246839,0.0000069911425,3.097173e-7,0.00092789286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994981,0.00003601083,0.000029449542,0.00010254628,0.0000034455572,0.000004897895,0.000007970709,4.1832135e-7,0.00031702936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993968,0.00020664065,0.000024658979,0.00004764443,0.000057340952,0.00026689642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984018,0.00028838482,0.00065521343,0.000038999544,0.0001535874,0.0004620795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009242936,0.00013452786,0.0001512235,0.00048261025,0.0045986567,0.0015922528,0.00039763137,0.00060476875,0.002233714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003006682,0.00013059571,0.0001329282,0.00042883016,0.0017285831,0.0006296956,0.0013106582,0.00123671,0.00008022276],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014315532,0.00048105413,0.8947505,0.000026649039,0.00007024208,0.00067335577,0.09318464,0.00010726482,0.00045192576,0.0009850267,0.0012886057,0.007837561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001122119,0.00006069567,0.7585347,0.000039067396,0.00002204245,0.000111137575,0.23861797,0.00012943076,0.00007755828,0.0002180634,0.0021690018,0.000009083905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08959155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27727312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08959155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020387939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015181914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17814016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966163956","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108259","title":"Light pollution is a driver of insect declines","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Impact of Light on Environment and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":406,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Light pollution; Foraging; Predation; Insectivore; Insect; Habitat destruction; Biology; Ecological trap; Climate change; Geography","score_opus":0.04677197053299734,"score_gpt":0.25805649915951684,"score_spread":0.2112845286265195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966163956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880229,0.0018997763,0.0009814345,0.0012385098,0.000042915028,0.00001038819,0.00078821444,0.000079293,0.006936618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99796045,0.00047411473,0.0001397218,0.00012249031,0.000032559907,0.000003116323,0.00027498387,0.0000073298474,0.0009851778],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967253,0.000043743312,0.000016994743,0.000111359215,0.000083037456,0.00007228206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983376,0.00021296504,0.00094065804,0.000085585874,0.00021115785,0.00021205304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004068059,0.00018938739,0.0002522471,0.0007910361,0.00045913368,0.0012606502,0.00024857468,0.0005097992,0.0038574664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011178353,0.00022309004,0.00039002972,0.00079616223,0.0003420289,0.00051702326,0.00040713625,0.00066188007,0.0004192978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015214585,0.00009786245,0.97335285,0.00006330146,0.00022418336,0.00009174898,0.00010860812,0.0005751879,0.0077759344,0.000563368,0.001277393,0.015717478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016643762,0.000036136298,0.9977659,0.000008370562,0.000023576627,0.000040323608,0.00011003762,0.0004651339,0.000299506,0.00017245865,0.0010732948,0.0000035457456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016143199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022935072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016143199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054566085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003846575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032098472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966206234","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.002","title":"Human-carnivore relations: A systematic review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":179,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka; Alberta Conservation Association; Leuphana Universität Lüneburg; Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research; Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España; National Science Foundation; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Advanced Foods and Materials Canada","keywords":"Carnivore; Geography; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Damages; Predation; Political science; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.12585455726413386,"score_gpt":0.3306909016058362,"score_spread":0.20483634434170234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966206234","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020860173,0.99935716,0.000026630807,0.0000983068,0.000053463777,0.000013354897,0.00014715844,0.0000018460285,0.00009342433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00188708,0.997644,0.00011979058,0.00017767564,0.00003077988,0.000016579183,0.00006820431,8.4068614e-7,0.00005513265],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988424,0.0002643559,0.00042834095,0.00016466426,0.00022068353,0.000079700134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99561775,0.0031118006,0.00082410406,0.0000617015,0.00026941163,0.00011518808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002368454,0.0011201516,0.0032176983,0.009270755,0.00037340654,0.0018170107,0.0012545694,0.0015880391,0.007424011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006963634,0.0005998202,0.0032639694,0.01218727,0.0006923015,0.0016606632,0.0015639919,0.0009220032,0.00048081574],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019682672,0.0000463429,0.0019076254,0.8011958,0.0064002383,0.0002082834,0.00025513963,0.00016146163,0.0002636597,0.000706468,0.010805558,0.17785262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002503198,0.00023693024,0.020511253,0.70828176,0.059352953,0.0013608853,0.0009943915,0.0001254769,0.00018198357,0.0012486746,0.20735085,0.00010453528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010696583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041885734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010696583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001539369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00650349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024835765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966401516","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.026","title":"Smartphone technologies supporting community-based environmental monitoring and implementation: a systematic scoping review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Documentation; Process (computing); Data collection; Scholarship; Citizen science; Computer science; Business; Data science; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.07958328390160851,"score_gpt":0.3252559943732309,"score_spread":0.24567271047162237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966401516","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020895659,0.99548537,0.00042133528,0.0004430581,0.00017443205,0.00047678707,0.00033004617,0.000009743867,0.0005695192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01885337,0.9780887,0.0013507368,0.000624967,0.00008955864,0.00060345547,0.00026364048,0.0000071899035,0.00011828281],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920367,0.002457482,0.0031011046,0.0007374042,0.0013548313,0.000312491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9440695,0.0462067,0.005201593,0.0006645142,0.0034500181,0.00040778058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015424935,0.0014768224,0.0044007753,0.010050646,0.000905271,0.0043134894,0.0021624146,0.0035149874,0.005057594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06328032,0.0010785203,0.00689374,0.008571815,0.0014739886,0.004437608,0.0026545878,0.0019669235,0.00055564515],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027529066,0.00011553756,0.002473547,0.7829811,0.004340345,0.00011283961,0.00077887066,0.00031194935,0.0002634167,0.00085007865,0.0020518485,0.20544526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001256371,0.00028913002,0.0054676873,0.9409894,0.024827166,0.00023644151,0.0011266178,0.00023042773,0.00024560178,0.0006173963,0.025795905,0.00004865492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013253442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029585259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015424935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030110576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019256104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08157581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972513999","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108239","title":"Conservation translocations and post-release monitoring: Identifying trends in failures, biases, and challenges from around the world","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":202,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; McGill University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Habitat; Chromosomal translocation; Habitat destruction; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.09147378956726233,"score_gpt":0.2739068676162943,"score_spread":0.18243307804903197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972513999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97870857,0.0034173606,0.0071460675,0.003687794,0.00015212724,0.00006886376,0.0011117259,0.000053613658,0.0056539164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916807,0.0016044003,0.004169101,0.0006843803,0.0000564869,0.00007204481,0.0006815057,0.000031260337,0.0010200703],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99047184,0.005054241,0.0009326279,0.0014880245,0.0014571318,0.00059611327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9239812,0.02431744,0.031168016,0.007559527,0.011116222,0.0018575371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01833512,0.000407348,0.00040103387,0.0019648857,0.00086050906,0.0021340197,0.0010307236,0.0007801954,0.0014380224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049618825,0.00028650888,0.00025817743,0.003602884,0.0013079316,0.003516713,0.0019980976,0.0012324731,0.00035348037],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009699016,0.00003581904,0.9375327,0.00008892546,0.0000820135,0.000042909614,0.0028586353,0.000169594,0.00031432364,0.00036454882,0.000961613,0.057451908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010935165,0.00019594905,0.979887,0.0004904483,0.00008903578,0.00039741394,0.009037792,0.0013062267,0.00044365795,0.0008823322,0.007227803,0.00003132838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016335798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039921932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01833512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069605786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016337212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096966565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972906205","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108242","title":"Scaling from individual physiological measures to population-level demographic change: Case studies and future directions for conservation management","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Wilfrid Laurier University; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Stressor; Environmental change; Population; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biodiversity; Environmental planning; Geography; Climate change; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.23393155380043715,"score_gpt":0.32369426938415086,"score_spread":0.08976271558371371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972906205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8002188,0.008174378,0.14381787,0.01512311,0.000602278,0.0008183969,0.0012078166,0.00045673686,0.029580561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578067,0.0014956568,0.038919497,0.00037696995,0.00014673857,0.00022730783,0.00020911082,0.00007274048,0.0007451946],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916858,0.0062739165,0.0004699141,0.0007563549,0.00065994106,0.0001540587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93716186,0.047580976,0.003532559,0.0065947627,0.0044704904,0.0006593341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022465859,0.0009907967,0.0010447995,0.002098792,0.0011106647,0.0036565287,0.0024513844,0.0014160075,0.0059170322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08901146,0.0003625816,0.0014009324,0.0038075354,0.0035764633,0.004467926,0.0017521215,0.0024754298,0.0005093878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006623819,0.0012215398,0.52787066,0.00085077883,0.00074890355,0.00077808806,0.0043296115,0.041128512,0.0028299426,0.02576019,0.0067550777,0.3870643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010355466,0.0016435573,0.59987,0.0007115185,0.00065585086,0.0019295913,0.016603649,0.19872533,0.0029285485,0.16290271,0.013539309,0.0003864224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012247497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007979407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022465859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018174577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011860157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1188122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990626691","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108271","title":"A review of successes, challenges, and lessons from Indigenous protected and conserved areas","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Victoria","keywords":"Indigenous; Corporate governance; Legislation; Commit; Indigenous rights; Environmental planning; Political science; Resource (disambiguation); Scale (ratio); Livelihood; Environmental resource management; Business; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.17342385755937162,"score_gpt":0.30232251055142273,"score_spread":0.1288986529920511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990626691","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000806371,0.9991905,0.000027091595,0.0002210033,0.00010021697,0.0000027513513,0.00002613149,0.000001883893,0.00034981192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002928115,0.999368,0.000076787386,0.000108214175,0.000043694137,0.0000023480138,0.000015725824,4.603907e-7,0.00009192096],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950767,0.00008530704,0.00010676282,0.0000739088,0.00018916323,0.000037124286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986325,0.00083101506,0.00019106886,0.000019654299,0.0002515021,0.00007415871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015826803,0.00071823405,0.0014699679,0.0047225426,0.00043764972,0.0019116873,0.0010547885,0.001018666,0.0037470558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002568707,0.00027331538,0.0007177195,0.0073896204,0.00054042274,0.0017338225,0.0009481257,0.0012790735,0.00058159395],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060253617,0.000045049273,0.00040727612,0.09358873,0.00022065916,0.00013111693,0.0002818602,0.00019621846,0.0006733464,0.004034819,0.034417845,0.86594284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014279912,0.00007007776,0.0034976213,0.0595356,0.0005225239,0.00068501104,0.00048078038,0.000055247387,0.00015382102,0.0017270113,0.9332237,0.000034230678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064417333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019965013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064417333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001264796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039676973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012808502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994673543","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108368","title":"Indirect effects of habitat loss via habitat fragmentation: A cross-taxa analysis of forest-dependent species","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":196,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fig Tree Foundation; Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz; Marshall-Smith Syndroom Research Foundation; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás; Conseil Français de l'Énergie; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais; Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia; Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Center for Stroke Research Berlin; Dermatology Foundation; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Sight Research UK; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; Natural Environment Research Council; National Instruments Corporation; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; American College of Dentists; Association of American Railroads; European Commission","keywords":"Species richness; Habitat; Ecology; Habitat fragmentation; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat destruction; Biodiversity; Extinction debt; Geography; Taxon; Biology","score_opus":0.01521105770654943,"score_gpt":0.25184223829975827,"score_spread":0.23663118059320884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994673543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99931633,0.00010465056,0.00023499221,0.000008213876,0.0000017596074,0.0000031877298,0.000056792025,0.0000017059433,0.00027228863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99928445,0.000039736275,0.00021562997,0.00000821816,0.0000024761384,0.0000057732927,0.00011161757,0.000002635881,0.0003294647],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917513,0.00054360495,0.000027328664,0.00010765069,0.000070904294,0.00007546549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955497,0.0027496866,0.00054803543,0.00036140738,0.00023002573,0.00056116824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00168214,0.0004937408,0.0005137471,0.0009269804,0.00053928915,0.00083201163,0.00071646005,0.00044095167,0.00454516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029818479,0.00026441677,0.0011766439,0.0005812268,0.0004791031,0.000600839,0.0011622388,0.00069859915,0.00020599228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007846279,0.00021924525,0.98747176,0.000030966206,0.0015522083,0.0001868253,0.00019576584,0.0017165936,0.0023830018,0.00039857245,0.00006426985,0.00499623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001065036,0.00024176021,0.9950931,0.000010003904,0.00036467018,0.00014287814,0.00021197494,0.0034293747,0.00019629489,0.00015524516,0.00013639704,0.000007606093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063936533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0122973565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063936533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035545914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026919952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015205026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015027376","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108571","title":"Impacts of the coronavirus pandemic on biodiversity conservation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":384,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Biodiversity; Wildlife; Sustainability; Public relations; Convention on Biological Diversity; Environmental ethics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Biology; Medicine","score_opus":0.11319223748168164,"score_gpt":0.33716536752715354,"score_spread":0.2239731300454719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015027376","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012364954,0.00417246,0.00005020364,0.033472057,0.96114385,0.000012459036,0.000043325486,0.00002786273,0.0010654334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00019651004,0.0036078691,0.000065941305,0.023677705,0.9675706,0.000017715663,0.000026987436,0.000021270598,0.004815392],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99185634,0.0016894446,0.0008887436,0.00067950244,0.004281833,0.0006040506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9523824,0.021202162,0.0024022125,0.00087597733,0.015974242,0.007162905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015091328,0.005643396,0.006111883,0.005262485,0.0054859957,0.012405457,0.005937556,0.0378461,0.026477652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04292834,0.001947656,0.0044324733,0.0025067173,0.004250123,0.008207054,0.0035902595,0.032409366,0.01507636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029556832,0.000017818482,0.000027028575,0.00034332843,0.00002423267,0.00007049261,0.000016494132,0.000025503745,0.000028812266,0.00036386063,0.9940912,0.0049616583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010758505,0.00004944122,0.00046805342,0.0013044394,0.00013316642,0.0002005167,0.00012309644,0.00022965907,0.00006908352,0.0029063025,0.9943638,0.0000448604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005117899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012344486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0378461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004802188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006771499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088576615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033060249","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108665","title":"COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdown as a “Global Human Confinement Experiment” to investigate biodiversity conservation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":267,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Biodiversity; Pandemic; Wildlife; Environmental resource management; Convention on Biological Diversity; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Strengths and weaknesses; Environmental planning; Diversity (politics); Wildlife trade; Population; Business; Geography; Ecology; Political science; Environmental science; Biology; Sociology","score_opus":0.31387206629277786,"score_gpt":0.4332515203622993,"score_spread":0.11937945406952144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033060249","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018449296,0.99649316,0.000081403705,0.0011927536,0.00049093325,0.0000331009,0.0001408647,0.000007107457,0.0013760333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022932985,0.99370426,0.00039909326,0.002588755,0.00025934348,0.000085039144,0.0001586999,0.0000029244572,0.0005085986],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993936,0.00023168173,0.000084331135,0.00007096689,0.00015348317,0.000065928616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855727,0.0008578368,0.00027731666,0.000027863325,0.00018178253,0.00009793123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024239952,0.0011177378,0.0016631228,0.0013917768,0.0002796945,0.0010108777,0.00090724236,0.0020936423,0.006525902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030022827,0.0002525055,0.0014608935,0.0014849098,0.0007812399,0.0012163515,0.0009370936,0.0019264092,0.0007971856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045697813,0.00015213738,0.00042513592,0.08725223,0.000809847,0.00009786261,0.000071146475,0.0004952514,0.0005650579,0.008786557,0.061359435,0.8395282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038022985,0.0005686665,0.0030124616,0.071480475,0.0019324606,0.00028142173,0.00022136074,0.00016824955,0.00035034257,0.0058795996,0.91567004,0.000054738342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008631935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025465017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008631935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018163242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067536267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021831334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038412545","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108654","title":"Genetic diversity targets and indicators in the CBD post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework must be improved","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":596,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet; Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; European Cooperation in Science and Technology; European Commission","keywords":"Convention on Biological Diversity; Biodiversity; Genetic diversity; Conservation genetics; Agricultural biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Population; Diversity (politics); Measurement of biodiversity; Global biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Environmental planning; Geography; Biodiversity conservation; Political science; Genetics; Economics","score_opus":0.053570431649487674,"score_gpt":0.23458924704659287,"score_spread":0.18101881539710518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038412545","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015567372,0.02647289,0.068664156,0.77678174,0.03638493,0.00031087192,0.0036073024,0.00070288085,0.07150781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32425123,0.0151471095,0.23329842,0.37995547,0.008754268,0.001655464,0.0066771368,0.0005047122,0.029756209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97337115,0.009087354,0.0022040654,0.0023859534,0.010831599,0.002119798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95941705,0.013169665,0.0036641287,0.0030956727,0.018137906,0.0025156124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04305312,0.0010259745,0.0011566272,0.0030127643,0.0021297552,0.008086567,0.0038223004,0.009265877,0.0031874795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056360617,0.00046148026,0.001095055,0.0023124886,0.006209367,0.008392227,0.0057800985,0.010816463,0.0017578347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000316957,0.00022860046,0.010814289,0.0011061748,0.000073374824,0.00034960883,0.002725996,0.0039247083,0.003033873,0.4210598,0.27962857,0.27673814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043691707,0.00019038781,0.011687999,0.0017421844,0.000057147994,0.0002387397,0.001370753,0.0021297133,0.0019343727,0.18198445,0.79840845,0.00021206324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021126322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017799828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04305312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006990811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015470692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22768939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080497588","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108732","title":"High conservation priority of range-edge plant populations not matched by habitat protection or research effort","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Endangered species; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; National park; Geography; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Taxon; Population; Conservation status; Threatened species; Biology; Demography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.3255004920044747,"score_gpt":0.3429390359988002,"score_spread":0.01743854399432554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080497588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850953,0.0004645383,0.0012257666,0.00047168342,0.00005205721,0.00002902761,0.00017431504,0.000029716233,0.012457575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998283,0.00008452842,0.0005337365,0.000116313844,0.000023616736,0.0000039477163,0.00009447479,0.0000056772346,0.0008546924],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946016,0.00013942718,0.00003370012,0.00012978232,0.00008533585,0.00015164366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995161,0.00071420165,0.0010778324,0.000323404,0.00071799837,0.0020057159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011691811,0.000124875,0.0002376285,0.0013631813,0.0009294283,0.0008691152,0.00034730922,0.00045575667,0.0071523725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023799436,0.00008423362,0.00012264031,0.0007282374,0.00038156152,0.00053027924,0.00060660276,0.00061268243,0.00042760433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062622904,0.0002111306,0.9322288,0.00023300217,0.00014640148,0.0004223041,0.0006356686,0.00032115067,0.018054705,0.0029016843,0.0012289028,0.042990007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014062945,0.00020224345,0.99060625,0.00003048348,0.00005759822,0.000769877,0.0011598485,0.00040351963,0.0014660796,0.001790395,0.0034915986,0.000008020853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015008007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066726822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071523725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004015635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049234636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023927093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090202716","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108797","title":"Designing wildlife-vehicle conflict observation systems to inform ecology and transportation studies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Red Deer College","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Agency (philosophy); Data collection; Harm; Environmental resource management; Baseline (sea); Wildlife conservation; Transport engineering; Environmental planning; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Psychology; Engineering; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.12785305645000883,"score_gpt":0.290333746143175,"score_spread":0.16248068969316615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090202716","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19951898,0.0001871527,0.79009265,0.0005983372,0.00009450543,0.001795521,0.0013746513,0.001910943,0.004427269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46119833,0.00012052985,0.5347797,0.00010785592,0.000025744452,0.0013645017,0.0010360875,0.000088977446,0.0012782406],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979595,0.001135105,0.00010472357,0.00036831226,0.00024305111,0.00018933153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98901665,0.006641067,0.0011253576,0.0010925923,0.0015893471,0.0005349816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048111314,0.00055911456,0.0004934314,0.0013946653,0.0012942731,0.0020307687,0.0014499162,0.0012096156,0.0031683184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016103698,0.0008741661,0.00039441863,0.0012325142,0.00072097575,0.0037049395,0.0022568055,0.0008575615,0.0007939822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018920358,0.0013275596,0.22800814,0.00071595644,0.00039671973,0.0005449681,0.005866368,0.20561261,0.10675147,0.014341647,0.010750486,0.42379212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021105254,0.00059862953,0.04626075,0.000121882644,0.00021195739,0.00015302196,0.004107667,0.8821682,0.032828033,0.015192733,0.018010575,0.00013559232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01346967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03423461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01346967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012789005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028841728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026782513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092532218","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108764","title":"On the conservation value of historic canals for aquatic ecosystems","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Recreation; Environmental planning; Ecosystem services; Habitat; Cultural heritage; Ecosystem; Geography; Business; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.07494716374772924,"score_gpt":0.2370913080082167,"score_spread":0.16214414426048745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092532218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58639824,0.012348451,0.0017229669,0.05785779,0.00045537134,0.00004496405,0.0008587324,0.000018600742,0.34029496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99331516,0.0028014104,0.00031838747,0.00048295647,0.00011610658,0.0000066453454,0.00006974116,0.0000041218586,0.0028854052],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975783,0.0014021408,0.000057955833,0.00011177738,0.00069801125,0.0001518603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98239756,0.010593962,0.0019745787,0.00089098595,0.003469738,0.00067315303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044698482,0.00018913962,0.00019906124,0.0017147273,0.0019868247,0.0026720439,0.0009933737,0.0010726955,0.010748489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018589348,0.00012523454,0.0001569367,0.002368871,0.006262052,0.002946943,0.0012820306,0.0008957206,0.0003358161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009034376,0.00034672854,0.35278064,0.0007349861,0.00026905924,0.0015355137,0.006617096,0.0054797363,0.0011013966,0.2090593,0.038526606,0.38264546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000734265,0.0005795071,0.62963885,0.002640746,0.0005332828,0.0022314056,0.044530973,0.0049483823,0.0018419545,0.102186665,0.21070054,0.00009429811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02258481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073002115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02258481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002789519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001913374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044906676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096183084","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108826","title":"Integrating season-specific needs of migratory and resident birds in conservation planning","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Bird conservation; Ecology; Geography; Population; Nearctic ecozone; Conservation biology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.10928398491655597,"score_gpt":0.26911568715136286,"score_spread":0.1598317022348069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096183084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9060694,0.00092765474,0.048439804,0.0033939448,0.0000766785,0.0002522951,0.0012470328,0.00009685355,0.0394963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98140407,0.00024733032,0.016049162,0.0001107182,0.000021508085,0.00009457964,0.00027662993,0.000022393446,0.0017736135],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929535,0.0003556726,0.000037530077,0.000057925954,0.00008425348,0.00016932005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689376,0.0014331534,0.00032855457,0.00015144669,0.00065614894,0.00053686264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026802667,0.00026916742,0.00037051074,0.0014235983,0.0008556797,0.00128648,0.0006365323,0.00069930154,0.005286221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065129027,0.00047352945,0.00042642772,0.0011710548,0.00040210117,0.0021220117,0.00113235,0.0006759482,0.0002802759],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038280926,0.00046481946,0.67349225,0.00048056175,0.00037413015,0.00027422703,0.0039042188,0.105151325,0.0028717336,0.010206582,0.0057682097,0.19662906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027821105,0.0005221034,0.76477534,0.00035550309,0.0003466984,0.00048267312,0.016260356,0.17354997,0.0016307294,0.02710752,0.014858085,0.000083217135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025373375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13500814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025373375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013346742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002385544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05045134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3100472575","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108850","title":"Avian community response to landscape-scale habitat reclamation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Bureau of Land Management; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Land reclamation; Habitat; Species richness; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Geography; Environmental science; Wildlife; Revegetation; Vegetation (pathology); Landscape ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.057551100271794824,"score_gpt":0.24527753405177696,"score_spread":0.18772643377998213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3100472575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995345,0.000012265185,0.000024384397,0.000010961871,0.0000012134685,0.0000017751712,0.000015205022,0.0000014214825,0.00039830853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946004,0.000010380678,0.000050337876,0.000014136609,0.0000014473774,0.000002844094,0.00004167362,9.960921e-7,0.00041825537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987876,0.00003778571,0.000004387357,0.000026229716,0.000015417932,0.000037408972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993729,0.00013685494,0.0001647167,0.00004098723,0.00013262157,0.00015189165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023487165,0.00008283977,0.00012419208,0.00020527976,0.00020925727,0.0002360829,0.0001781933,0.00020481796,0.0025246379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009837713,0.000078605466,0.000101630314,0.00009998846,0.00013250601,0.00015749752,0.00019746028,0.00015756526,0.0001582306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023201287,0.0007222276,0.8990323,0.00007031969,0.0002165016,0.0002724332,0.00074666773,0.0031027808,0.06634317,0.00014406898,0.0007484629,0.026280943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005367541,0.00013511864,0.9979658,0.0000022011986,0.0000088946435,0.000028407807,0.0003390044,0.0009295593,0.00040342112,0.000021177695,0.00015929707,0.0000017270634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012515832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07007788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012515832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047492108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017122099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024886012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109417050","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108871","title":"Long-term effectiveness of Natura 2000 network to protect biodiversity: A hint of optimism for common birds","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage","funders":"","keywords":"Natura 2000; Biodiversity; Geography; Habitat; Bird conservation; Ecology; Conservation biology; Population decline; Land management; Habitat destruction; Common species; Environmental resource management; Land use; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.03901468404880723,"score_gpt":0.25863839065967503,"score_spread":0.2196237066108678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109417050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79057515,0.0043422184,0.0025749055,0.08562594,0.00084210985,0.000079264195,0.0012070405,0.00006700564,0.114686415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917486,0.00038709908,0.00060525123,0.0025850686,0.00015430783,0.00001628679,0.000144952,0.000013626147,0.0043448512],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969271,0.0010376013,0.00014651626,0.00031837923,0.0007988771,0.00077154656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96873224,0.007925764,0.0052898997,0.0022755633,0.006882421,0.008894165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01180819,0.00018631243,0.00019811504,0.0006753432,0.0015278312,0.0021353776,0.0010672001,0.0017267189,0.011239632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017757088,0.00009027144,0.0003933725,0.0005501474,0.0022454122,0.0035335182,0.0014508374,0.0019280518,0.000598794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012208847,0.001172605,0.7245673,0.00040471193,0.0007309293,0.00024229845,0.0020572364,0.0035301538,0.0023327076,0.034424447,0.02045638,0.20886032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057683174,0.0011444603,0.9426257,0.00035297778,0.000166484,0.00019417045,0.004581051,0.0020417713,0.0014003277,0.010508961,0.036879115,0.00004721628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01749852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050847523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01749852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027315111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023462824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062448382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114092777","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108923","title":"A hippo in the room: Predicting the persistence and dispersion of an invasive mega-vertebrate in Colombia, South America","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fondation Rideau Hall; Queen Elizabeth Scholars; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fondations communautaires du Canada; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Population; Ecology; Geography; Population growth; Habitat; Population viability analysis; Climate change; Invasive species; Endangered species; Biology","score_opus":0.04746030794473014,"score_gpt":0.2173962449192939,"score_spread":0.16993593697456377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114092777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984219,0.000110967856,0.00014924086,0.000095003954,0.000005661468,0.000005960327,0.000384576,0.000006879091,0.00081981753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930596,0.00005678602,0.00020332559,0.000008562147,0.0000027680112,0.000003364362,0.00026513927,0.00000211225,0.00015206382],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999083,0.00001539613,0.0000047904496,0.00003224566,0.000011971665,0.000027368416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950325,0.00012992066,0.00014605897,0.000024438856,0.00008464344,0.000111660964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020158206,0.0002752148,0.0001836912,0.00070730696,0.0004883454,0.0006972851,0.00043785083,0.00041177293,0.0014047254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012645363,0.00012868167,0.00019524473,0.0006318637,0.00030937485,0.00047864093,0.00054041145,0.00034152417,0.00019823505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059167938,0.000025210005,0.99264634,0.000021088992,0.000026433163,0.000070696864,0.0004640999,0.0017348102,0.00033060386,0.00009236257,0.00043367298,0.004095568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065939357,0.000021195103,0.9786471,0.000033222812,0.000039640774,0.00006219199,0.0036633979,0.016433012,0.00010204812,0.00012848731,0.00085306936,0.000010050679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24282578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4475277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24282578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091662497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059796876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48282474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122264597","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108968","title":"COVID19-induced reduction in human disturbance enhances fattening of an overabundant goose species","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Université Laval","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; ArcticNet; Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada; Canada First Research Excellence Fund; Eastern Bird Banding Association","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Goose; Foraging; Waterfowl; Ecology; Habitat; Wildlife; Population; Trophic level; Anatidae; Geography; Ecosystem; Predation; Fishery; Biology; Environmental science; Demography","score_opus":0.06198314489929072,"score_gpt":0.28746397573624405,"score_spread":0.22548083083695333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122264597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976738,0.00034343815,0.000260377,0.00008993602,0.00009277151,0.000019516843,0.00049327046,0.000044480603,0.0009823972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928308,0.00044098354,0.000529257,0.00018073524,0.000026837699,0.00007656242,0.0014471847,0.00003051906,0.004437081],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982065,0.00001564676,0.000011378191,0.000046812045,0.00002352825,0.000082144616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980074,0.0000149496345,0.000050041566,0.000019923562,0.00001635885,0.00009799831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012908316,0.00029529535,0.00043602753,0.00027330706,0.00037527934,0.00041022527,0.00027787726,0.0003937651,0.00526612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020280549,0.00018070111,0.00029153677,0.00019411059,0.00037092937,0.0001483972,0.00048248694,0.0008521882,0.0003810401],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002816205,0.0005453155,0.0033019006,0.00013905577,0.00004853243,0.00021266293,0.000056216522,0.00011743287,0.98693013,0.00011366624,0.00043080183,0.005287953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045401847,0.00890642,0.32683963,0.0000662251,0.0003129459,0.0010903402,0.001003369,0.0018334499,0.6433601,0.0002211704,0.015845926,0.00006645963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002666257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006594897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00526612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035681296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000373863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017616987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126874272","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108980","title":"Knowledge production for target-based biodiversity governance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Convention on Biological Diversity; Accountability; Corporate governance; Sustainability; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Vision; Environmental planning; Action (physics); Political science; Business; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05298868937214538,"score_gpt":0.2312576587819764,"score_spread":0.17826896940983103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126874272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024065297,0.017795142,0.3506897,0.1214935,0.0019086848,0.0010671411,0.0015260964,0.00063682353,0.48081753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7650889,0.012943482,0.18800013,0.011221163,0.0020058523,0.0017317082,0.0019217031,0.00037696588,0.01671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.937189,0.03311153,0.005022212,0.008757561,0.013322559,0.002597118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7246021,0.17882143,0.018846886,0.049302403,0.024597283,0.0038298448],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08230484,0.00092731824,0.0013706328,0.011076746,0.0049212775,0.022448596,0.004464326,0.006355916,0.0126122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16224618,0.00070520927,0.00166754,0.0108411955,0.023636106,0.024402862,0.015935378,0.005036034,0.003310007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028491357,0.0000537174,0.003188601,0.0014074954,0.000104473795,0.00052081846,0.010103184,0.0027485886,0.00060320087,0.84280694,0.013829131,0.12460532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016243688,0.00002324062,0.0012862738,0.0022767666,0.00004107104,0.00015635807,0.003101144,0.0012869345,0.00052702153,0.87249684,0.11875453,0.00003372341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003922257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031913377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99507874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01003711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03141443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43527484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127899071","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108973","title":"Using the 2020 global pandemic as a springboard to highlight the need for amphibian conservation in eastern Asia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum","funders":"","keywords":"Amphibian; Pandemic; Geography; Conservation science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Environmental planning; Political science; Environmental resource management; Biology; Agroforestry; Ecology; Biodiversity; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Medicine; Environmental science","score_opus":0.29149291317669274,"score_gpt":0.4463380702345563,"score_spread":0.15484515705786356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127899071","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000710254,0.9952669,0.00007466868,0.002663768,0.00074407266,0.000004506272,0.000048415397,0.0000068986246,0.0011197119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00084485736,0.9961041,0.00017887737,0.0020024958,0.00034312878,0.0000056616786,0.000045786815,0.0000017483901,0.00047325695],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997346,0.00006206865,0.000040171715,0.000030717827,0.000084442494,0.00004797867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991769,0.00034000803,0.00013404679,0.000014566072,0.00023502532,0.00009953554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013083746,0.0009162758,0.0013031252,0.0019137665,0.00027471804,0.0016230552,0.0008382517,0.0018248875,0.007224537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014958227,0.00019874035,0.0007480276,0.0018643654,0.0005272502,0.0019135097,0.0012231994,0.0028408275,0.0013743057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066442735,0.000056715344,0.0003904814,0.037391014,0.00020562271,0.00025493457,0.00017795977,0.0006319793,0.0006762374,0.010173245,0.084837906,0.8651375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017035965,0.0000786288,0.0015307569,0.021023741,0.00024469724,0.00037053897,0.00031980494,0.00011211498,0.000097394644,0.0032973676,0.9728865,0.000021349028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006824892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014690466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007224537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011730851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051171533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024168432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127926664","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108995","title":"The power of national acoustic tracking networks to assess the impacts of human activity on marine organisms during the COVID-19 pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"South Australian Research and Development Institute; University of Tasmania; Flinders University; Biology Society of South Australia; Department of Environment and Water; Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment","keywords":"Tourism; Recreation; TRIPS architecture; Geography; Fishery; Marine protected area; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Tracking (education); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Engineering; Transport engineering; Habitat","score_opus":0.21939662343062563,"score_gpt":0.38262843733692486,"score_spread":0.16323181390629923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127926664","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007690697,0.9983941,0.00010816492,0.00049464585,0.0001301853,0.0000075105468,0.0000954269,0.0000037503576,0.0006893146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00095654756,0.9981906,0.00025184892,0.00027029467,0.00010975467,0.000010845215,0.00007308554,0.000001976142,0.00013506519],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864906,0.00042415768,0.0001892085,0.00019622571,0.0004590673,0.000082317885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928685,0.00525742,0.00069119903,0.00009297854,0.0009476966,0.00014212662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042263065,0.0013587608,0.0018892644,0.0035181304,0.00023508628,0.0018411393,0.0013259711,0.0021989848,0.0042778025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010215562,0.00045520134,0.0018023306,0.0039660754,0.0005655125,0.0025334456,0.0015056158,0.0024338285,0.0009870294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007528858,0.000025836285,0.00044059267,0.027718151,0.0005812308,0.00004542737,0.000051102452,0.0006369457,0.00018273966,0.0025859901,0.01221392,0.9554429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000888281,0.00025815677,0.007241609,0.111328565,0.0024933363,0.00045279742,0.00024164228,0.00055204437,0.00046929697,0.0071914,0.86957973,0.000102475686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015530826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0196309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015530826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019196777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00583188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030880868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129634834","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108992","title":"A synthesis of the prevalence and drivers of non-compliance in marine protected areas","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, Australian Research Council; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Marine protected area; Business; Enforcement; Livelihood; Compliance (psychology); Corporate governance; Fishing; Environmental resource management; Fisheries management; Resource (disambiguation); Adaptive management; Environmental planning; Fishery; Geography; Ecology; Psychology; Habitat; Computer science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.03373487846077171,"score_gpt":0.22494043871929925,"score_spread":0.19120556025852753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129634834","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060272156,0.98602724,0.00092593563,0.0016208523,0.00035882244,0.0003919174,0.0035879898,0.000026840735,0.001033217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.085285075,0.90527755,0.0029257876,0.0022857587,0.00027389277,0.0013121614,0.002323874,0.00003208157,0.00028375667],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9732117,0.008400012,0.012648265,0.002223856,0.0029318237,0.000584362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.864361,0.10962382,0.0141317025,0.002665283,0.008630586,0.0005875613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025709914,0.0015187908,0.0064613004,0.0185656,0.0007957318,0.0046402183,0.001843283,0.0021723278,0.0052780434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11757038,0.0011624227,0.014105873,0.01887607,0.0013081752,0.0039184997,0.0030962746,0.0024468293,0.0004203756],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024411241,0.000022040882,0.0065689753,0.9096554,0.034826364,0.00018622242,0.0010033987,0.0002570727,0.0002033987,0.0008861155,0.002719623,0.04342724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013409102,0.00015766865,0.024166932,0.7812598,0.1576957,0.00037340086,0.0011483559,0.00016581213,0.00022743466,0.0016688686,0.03292706,0.0000749859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013491142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029727582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025709914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045150407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011497235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13596863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139301940","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109062","title":"Spatial population genetics reveals competitive imbalances threatening local apex predator persistence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada; W. Garfield Weston Foundation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Canis; Biology; Niche; Apex predator; Ecology; Niche differentiation; Population; Ecological niche; Gray wolf; Competition (biology); Geography; Predation; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.03873441486442593,"score_gpt":0.23822063129821094,"score_spread":0.199486216433785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139301940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999509,0.000009056825,0.00012028871,0.000017356077,0.0000010433347,7.773951e-7,0.000016135022,0.0000040854284,0.00032225635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99981457,0.0000045264305,0.000052553278,0.000013064727,9.554763e-7,0.0000010940922,0.000016409593,0.00000213214,0.00009467912],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998223,0.000038863727,0.000010012223,0.00005405366,0.000036356698,0.000038428792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993017,0.00022043216,0.00017075852,0.000091436974,0.00007669096,0.00013908133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038076466,0.0001156559,0.00025908413,0.0006964201,0.00033239127,0.00056042516,0.0003033749,0.0003156583,0.002188667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010648115,0.00013224801,0.00014922259,0.0003307554,0.00060891395,0.00023899815,0.00047133607,0.00040716148,0.00014770235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009770724,0.00042511075,0.49760652,0.000050071732,0.00028205253,0.00040872715,0.00093933084,0.0036334733,0.47292733,0.004187434,0.0006570065,0.01790583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027602458,0.00018035834,0.986961,0.000004859548,0.00006919966,0.00034638992,0.00095786963,0.0060449885,0.0034198742,0.0016450132,0.0003257721,0.000017013055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030876922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0082972115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030876922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044826642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026460743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007321775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154139075","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109101","title":"Conservation status of the world's skinks (Scincidae): Taxonomic and geographic patterns in extinction risk","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"Australian Research Council; Israel Science Foundation; Rufford Foundation; Queen's University; Monash University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Skink; IUCN Red List; Threatened species; Conservation status; Biology; Data deficient; Ecology; Near-threatened species; Endangered species; Conservation biology; Umbrella species; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Habitat; Geography; Lizard","score_opus":0.02092186499111915,"score_gpt":0.2223952194157323,"score_spread":0.20147335442461314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154139075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99921215,0.00022159376,0.000027509137,0.000028702258,9.296081e-7,0.0000013786007,0.00006520886,0.0000016865681,0.00044089567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997441,0.00005946702,0.000031047985,0.000007277173,0.0000017478928,6.967034e-7,0.00008591333,5.6398005e-7,0.00006910253],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985707,0.000029301553,0.000013295961,0.000038883463,0.000030101734,0.000031163036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895823,0.00010120308,0.00064082467,0.000032429623,0.00013577566,0.0001315171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002896661,0.00013325548,0.00012004692,0.0015650823,0.00032546904,0.00043979284,0.00022974075,0.0002130309,0.002021503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009701553,0.00008058827,0.00012012411,0.000974683,0.0006668415,0.00048482668,0.00051837286,0.0001530061,0.00014719479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096566066,0.000019977711,0.99045765,0.000017366425,0.000032536187,0.000039190447,0.00043637896,0.000090825706,0.0020071194,0.00011530561,0.000096151525,0.0065909014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.2006707e-7,0.000011905059,0.999524,0.000002163933,0.0000029029866,0.000048148726,0.00023850641,0.00006678378,0.000020151085,0.000022268938,0.000061408806,9.3228954e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012682372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033014577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012682372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035694035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001586521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025217116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160998229","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109128","title":"Incorporating climate change in a harvest risk assessment for polar bears Ursus maritimus in Southern Hudson Bay","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs; Government of Quebec; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University; Government of Nunavut; University of Alberta; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Washington","keywords":"Ursus maritimus; Climate change; Sea ice; Geography; Bay; Arctic; Population; Environmental science; Wildlife management; Wildlife; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.07306148026606667,"score_gpt":0.2977313162747241,"score_spread":0.22466983600865742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160998229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99616516,0.000042776624,0.0024718156,0.00015342423,0.000007962182,0.00002043987,0.00025241685,0.000030110494,0.0008560091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986167,0.000028620609,0.00096033217,0.000022166718,0.0000028095333,0.000008182803,0.000112444206,0.0000045897864,0.0002440546],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972206,0.00009338307,0.000017094386,0.00006779775,0.00003514981,0.00006452154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953187,0.0001712227,0.00009742829,0.00002564059,0.00008939874,0.00008446089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012147931,0.0004950999,0.00034544137,0.000567746,0.000551396,0.0013965287,0.0006955585,0.0006265613,0.00076992734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018469178,0.00041411494,0.00055702595,0.00036526655,0.00040928216,0.00059755205,0.00067320623,0.00042907736,0.00005193285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008256669,0.000086091735,0.14302707,0.00001467374,0.00013620971,0.00016409153,0.00012214383,0.85131043,0.0006190069,0.0007361233,0.00029074005,0.0034108604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002231391,0.00008110458,0.041453782,0.000012740227,0.00010931627,0.000024796438,0.00029908403,0.95677835,0.00027689256,0.0005999348,0.00031681466,0.000024942226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31220648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35011184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31220648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004394203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028876485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62077844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164035390","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109168","title":"Range-wide declines of northern spotted owl populations in the Pacific Northwest: A meta-analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"College of Arts and Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; U.S. Bureau of Land Management; U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; William Talbott Hillman Foundation; Oregon State University; Colorado State University","keywords":"Occupancy; Habitat; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Population; Population decline; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.17134770568031252,"score_gpt":0.3094550218716824,"score_spread":0.13810731619136987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164035390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67139876,0.302923,0.010431032,0.0009449264,0.0005055461,0.00033075048,0.011264306,0.00042474954,0.001777098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98252285,0.012034807,0.00271362,0.00022517766,0.000053126143,0.00023304032,0.001939947,0.000050849085,0.00022666214],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962076,0.0014071128,0.0006213573,0.0013045645,0.00031305305,0.0001463643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99235547,0.0053298944,0.0009528273,0.00065970974,0.0004564773,0.00024564847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062788543,0.0014930157,0.0043419427,0.0037866444,0.00057986175,0.0018674673,0.002433633,0.0011433961,0.0025455928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010442267,0.0011549047,0.016694736,0.004445175,0.00036214685,0.0012226601,0.0010133422,0.0013936416,0.00022612995],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013085959,0.00007514164,0.26512352,0.010649265,0.7075472,0.00051880826,0.000251274,0.0021781754,0.00076272927,0.0001489609,0.0011406834,0.010295667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037386344,0.00055558555,0.23103961,0.0021288737,0.7552705,0.00057213276,0.00056717737,0.0060122134,0.0005118695,0.00053648825,0.0023573362,0.00007433028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012511949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01815997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012511949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084637175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009807798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033206165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165070499","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109175","title":"Global COVID-19 lockdown highlights humans as both threats and custodians of the environment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"COVID-19 impact on air quality","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nunavut Arctic College; Université du Québec à Rimouski; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Simon Fraser University; McMaster University; Victoria Heart Institute Foundation; Carleton University; Wildlife Conservation Society Canada; World Wildlife Fund Canada; University of Manitoba; University of Victoria; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; Tula Foundation; University of Toronto; Dalhousie University; University of British Columbia; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Ocean Networks Canada Society; Espace pour la vie; Parks Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Red Sea Research Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology; Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development; Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Horizon 2020; Seventh Framework Programme; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; Australian Research Council; Natural Environment Research Council; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; South Central Climate Adaptation Science Center; Disney Conservation Fund; California State University Long Beach; Council on Ocean Affairs Science and Technology, California State University; U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; National Science and Technology Major Project; Vlaamse regering; Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund; Provincia Autonoma di Trento; Regione Toscana; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Università di Pisa; Universidad de Costa Rica; Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Institut Polaire Français Paul Emile Victor; National Major Science and Technology Projects of China; European Regional Development Fund; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Department of Conservation, New Zealand; Ministry of Education, India; Cape Eleuthera Foundation; Labex; King Abdullah University of Science and Technology; Ministry of Environment; Biology Society of South Australia; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; National Parks Board - Singapore; Ian Potter Foundation; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; European Commission; Sight Research UK; Canada Research Chairs; National Geographic Society; Virginia Marine Resources Commission; Simon Fraser University; Canada First Research Excellence Fund; Commission for Environmental Cooperation; Tula Foundation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; University of Tasmania; Hakai Institute; Fundación Charles Darwin; Agência Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigação, Tecnologia e Inovação; Save Our Seas Foundation; ArcticNet; David and Elaine Potter Foundation; Department of Environment and Water; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Primate Conservation; National Pork Board; Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS); Australian Institute of Marine Science; Boston University; Fondation Bertarelli; South African National Parks; Liber Ero Foundation; A.G. Leventis Foundation; Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales; Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Canada Foundation for Innovation; Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Wildlife; Pandemic; Custodians; Biodiversity; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Geography; Business; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Biology; Environmental science; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.07475789187892563,"score_gpt":0.3219177236553838,"score_spread":0.24715983177645817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165070499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031043697,0.015177793,0.013897253,0.30058396,0.04384066,0.0006645603,0.015413861,0.0021762059,0.577202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3285328,0.016371816,0.020077359,0.45180723,0.007851045,0.0013213055,0.017868571,0.001447595,0.15472236],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98603237,0.0018815497,0.0006436584,0.0010136787,0.006599682,0.0038291733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781782,0.0046957247,0.00241341,0.0021419919,0.006917401,0.0056532025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012304216,0.0013741067,0.0008200239,0.003320051,0.0047206515,0.008424254,0.003248666,0.009067651,0.03510766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020043315,0.00061791873,0.002164182,0.0022941837,0.004089013,0.00410161,0.013648995,0.013578598,0.004989892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026113726,0.00018006076,0.021813063,0.0009234021,0.00014012438,0.0006529686,0.0011285546,0.0010256487,0.0022497629,0.10758489,0.7747539,0.08928643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030676445,0.00012043117,0.016778668,0.00080862606,0.000060786126,0.00024992286,0.0012238048,0.0004212677,0.0010822449,0.008466869,0.9706828,0.00007390355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13816002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16847645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13816002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054811663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025667313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27471167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166246801","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109204","title":"The conservation and ecological impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Geography; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Ecology; Nature Conservation; Biology; Virology; Medicine; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Outbreak; Disease","score_opus":0.13805349281896856,"score_gpt":0.36302958664941637,"score_spread":0.2249760938304478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166246801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4527027,0.069528915,0.0012517176,0.3026436,0.002577559,0.00007430261,0.0024450535,0.00004707708,0.16872916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9555406,0.02928612,0.00049753685,0.009533341,0.001650164,0.00001899854,0.00041036968,0.000010152927,0.0030526624],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985348,0.0004632473,0.000044816024,0.00009560122,0.0003288313,0.00053279026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982186,0.00029396714,0.000467515,0.00007115836,0.00035328104,0.0005954569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016949446,0.00023312852,0.00022999366,0.0011239573,0.0013149687,0.0027810163,0.0004839969,0.0015511467,0.010632288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004414032,0.00013354296,0.00039945578,0.0010405877,0.002401917,0.0013995144,0.0019622834,0.0015529306,0.00034840274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010695996,0.00075812417,0.35048944,0.0011492154,0.0004246859,0.0036499687,0.0033757272,0.004075428,0.004751381,0.1204333,0.10330501,0.40651807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054832904,0.0005151957,0.70637614,0.001803428,0.000109868946,0.0030635844,0.013628235,0.002682193,0.00069418387,0.03625137,0.23473726,0.000083637075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038272053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05853294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038272053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029015655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004627154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07609856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3178457707","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109238","title":"Integrating multiple indices of geobiodiversity reveals a series of regional species-rich areas worthy of conservation in the region of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Species richness; Endemism; Taxon; Biodiversity; Ecology; Geography; Plateau (mathematics); Phylogenetic tree; Phylogenetic diversity; Species diversity; Biology","score_opus":0.055241648740844765,"score_gpt":0.2292556241896358,"score_spread":0.17401397544879105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3178457707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989969,0.0000963482,0.0003923895,0.000014921626,0.0000013847913,0.0000025785712,0.00009595574,0.000008766879,0.00039064122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993605,0.000027359762,0.0003017001,0.000005755014,0.0000028653826,0.0000022909858,0.00018820568,0.000002275628,0.00010915334],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99990404,0.000017940865,0.0000065502445,0.00002806583,0.000017097529,0.000026293117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980694,0.000028271746,0.00005552549,0.000009756868,0.000041564384,0.000057960697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026664662,0.00027096726,0.0003473253,0.0022565103,0.0004918782,0.0008439147,0.00023424298,0.00019679265,0.00058318285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028936964,0.00013560636,0.00023802553,0.0022480676,0.0003697547,0.00043007446,0.00044294895,0.00013296775,0.000058656333],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008346925,0.0000406612,0.9516721,0.000051878265,0.0001814574,0.00017775672,0.00084600196,0.00161462,0.02390912,0.00029537381,0.00023304793,0.020894451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014283122,0.000012615496,0.99798954,0.0000017392996,0.000014587287,0.00003154724,0.0003567442,0.0012807309,0.00012989783,0.000061096805,0.00011517457,0.0000049871824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020799225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05875043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020799225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042385448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004058766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041356325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181484852","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109230","title":"Road-effect mitigation promotes connectivity and reduces mortality at the population-level","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; Laurentian University","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","keywords":"Fencing; Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Population; Habitat; Geography; Fishery; Ecology; Biology; Computer science; Demography","score_opus":0.05563042347380104,"score_gpt":0.2858275691974989,"score_spread":0.23019714572369787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181484852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98467225,0.00037908385,0.0027374222,0.00033036622,0.000041077466,0.000027969609,0.00026973747,0.00010398296,0.011438066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99600106,0.00014895796,0.0008419597,0.00005323689,0.000015241138,0.000017650174,0.00021399907,0.000010337601,0.002697518],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987316,0.00003558058,0.000004046343,0.000029877818,0.000016159538,0.000041159965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996376,0.00005863639,0.00010155431,0.00003817657,0.00006248315,0.00010154182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017630936,0.00027971025,0.00021972135,0.00045101022,0.00040631817,0.00046602526,0.00041917313,0.00041857077,0.012246442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006305598,0.00009312488,0.00037502308,0.00022847923,0.00019701118,0.0005972878,0.0006364572,0.00030682085,0.00066626724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022064236,0.0058394163,0.3736988,0.0008839832,0.0014975809,0.001179243,0.0008448117,0.038105495,0.23325728,0.010622228,0.012406989,0.3194579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114437076,0.0027883803,0.9483216,0.0001148509,0.0005691212,0.00062534085,0.0012041081,0.0107282875,0.01591085,0.0052256836,0.01435327,0.00004419931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043121567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01880364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012246442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028903104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036644266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040968418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183235696","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109257","title":"Corrigendum to ‘Conservation through co-occurrence: Woodland caribou as a focal species for boreal biodiversity [Biol. Conserv. 232 (2019) 238–252]’","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Nature Conservancy of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; McGill University; University of British Columbia; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Boreal; Biodiversity; Geography; Environmental science; Woodland; Ecology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.19160432813729739,"score_gpt":0.39213035009910385,"score_spread":0.20052602196180647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183235696","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009386338,0.0018667266,0.00035524872,0.16799754,0.81636775,0.0000499727,0.001510211,0.0002865467,0.011472055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003066072,0.004680499,0.0017754278,0.4403933,0.17407048,0.0003317958,0.0019810647,0.0006242725,0.3730771],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959364,0.00060836796,0.00063824,0.0006473469,0.0017465162,0.00042302773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97403187,0.006965683,0.0013568894,0.0009672572,0.0150837535,0.0015945063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004301709,0.002093676,0.002038266,0.0030862628,0.005593154,0.0043437574,0.0033591285,0.010875622,0.069336586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034921546,0.0014987763,0.0017716485,0.002019282,0.0032571661,0.003277827,0.003071066,0.013700092,0.045508023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005719726,0.0000034378907,0.00003096442,0.000027332473,0.0000017939394,0.000040879433,0.000011763378,0.000008285249,0.00001039779,0.00018613557,0.9983209,0.0013523409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027297987,0.000013473772,0.0017834952,0.0002535593,0.000015080572,0.000112077905,0.00011118238,0.00009967132,0.00007868237,0.0010942944,0.99637127,0.000039908908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15900351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25998738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8409965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004790984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008256333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31615597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186113490","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109254","title":"Response to: Multiple measures of biodiversity change make for the strongest analyses with historical data","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Biodiversity; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.6990447762491367,"score_gpt":0.31795940352604596,"score_spread":0.3810853727230908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186113490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9292122,0.0032689613,0.027339354,0.014985828,0.0011876946,0.00017864833,0.008323055,0.0002836766,0.0152205145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932308,0.00017050472,0.0024031668,0.0007337518,0.0003960027,0.000099045916,0.0016582048,0.00007045686,0.0012380693],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876738,0.007373717,0.0011446179,0.0021121139,0.0011657218,0.00052994775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9418381,0.03547144,0.012782625,0.0061228904,0.0023230654,0.0014619133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013274981,0.00066503807,0.0012318175,0.0017933464,0.0009264148,0.0026234863,0.0014519568,0.0025846495,0.010816403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056866232,0.00037752942,0.00092440797,0.0027732037,0.0012990353,0.0031737054,0.0027583556,0.0020621517,0.0014247741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013250207,0.00018687024,0.906042,0.000832719,0.0031852429,0.0002602135,0.0004929817,0.007281483,0.0050688493,0.0038331053,0.0081451945,0.06334642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050965784,0.00040787467,0.9604144,0.0001248785,0.00071668933,0.0005113716,0.0009990181,0.009022816,0.003175933,0.008163276,0.01633665,0.00007611259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011561672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019948266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013274981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069755333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003548916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07020563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203355648","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109329","title":"Climate variability has idiosyncratic impacts on North American aerial insectivorous bird population trajectories","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Insectivore; Climate change; Population; Ecology; Geography; Storm; Breeding bird survey; Annual cycle; North Atlantic oscillation; Environmental science; Habitat; Climatology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.06199409021846784,"score_gpt":0.2625905083181821,"score_spread":0.20059641809971424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203355648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990349,0.000048148162,0.00008960824,0.00003781284,0.0000029386424,0.0000010152065,0.000117207266,0.0000029270745,0.0006654187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996309,0.00003555402,0.00003327055,0.000013703727,0.0000020545917,0.0000014063656,0.00012267954,0.0000036579024,0.000156722],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981636,0.00006350063,0.000009926331,0.000056352565,0.000018154462,0.000035773235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927276,0.00019388611,0.00021397187,0.00010708695,0.00009485785,0.0001175463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003711497,0.000097005264,0.00014877321,0.00031389823,0.00037815954,0.0005506591,0.00012913537,0.00023287394,0.0023968027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013541017,0.0001511203,0.00024588165,0.0004276822,0.00027553356,0.0003316417,0.00054220925,0.00024955592,0.00019592617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095845404,0.000023766901,0.99159384,0.000007562205,0.00014020767,0.000047433023,0.00027419487,0.0010630215,0.002330842,0.00013496492,0.00024633156,0.0040420303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.9051837e-7,0.0000048740676,0.99945956,9.569906e-7,0.0000063733855,0.000010943419,0.000102216414,0.00024954657,0.000027310696,0.000034427263,0.000101639685,0.0000014864586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016010439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07900015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016010439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035340912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021802972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031834483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217180529","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109402","title":"Balancing conservation priorities for grassland and forest specialist bird communities in agriculturally dominated landscapes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of British Columbia; Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","keywords":"Threatened species; Grassland; Geography; Habitat; Agroforestry; Ecology; Biodiversity; Woodland; Bird conservation; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.04722691541079571,"score_gpt":0.25083944878470466,"score_spread":0.20361253337390894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217180529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99889,0.000075870084,0.00023152039,0.000055148153,6.917226e-7,0.0000050999392,0.000016400532,0.0000028035051,0.0007224956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935657,0.000030838448,0.00047112888,0.000023841087,0.0000012193772,0.0000026698926,0.000016031461,8.5326917e-7,0.000096900665],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970526,0.000088039174,0.00000778368,0.00004617379,0.000036809164,0.00011596184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994654,0.00009538191,0.00016596253,0.000018999164,0.000058226055,0.0001960362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000559154,0.00012007165,0.00018787678,0.0006619605,0.0010085002,0.000900264,0.0003451245,0.0002975871,0.00081130565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091145665,0.00011339343,0.000093625924,0.00042870897,0.0007510819,0.0004168339,0.0006450142,0.0001526862,0.000054373093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014095624,0.00005435093,0.95105106,0.000115883755,0.00009166731,0.00025560096,0.0023633095,0.0033082177,0.017127704,0.0009751977,0.00043733677,0.024078863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050499802,0.00004680561,0.99399924,0.000014254526,0.000014336229,0.00009688401,0.002793709,0.0018671328,0.00018289188,0.00047279813,0.0004990294,0.000007875513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0753191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48402515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0753191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018002051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013458368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14976144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200194726","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109379","title":"Coupling process-based and empirical models to assess management options to meet conservation goals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre For Cold Ocean Resources Engineering","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Ecosystem services; Clearing; Process (computing); Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Ecology; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.12844813686088244,"score_gpt":0.32638925551277365,"score_spread":0.1979411186518912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200194726","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43672866,0.0003309261,0.5493624,0.0012281485,0.00013290037,0.00025745123,0.00034846604,0.00057864166,0.011032301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97760105,0.00013199392,0.021042343,0.00009342835,0.00002013,0.000111676505,0.00015501361,0.000047459074,0.00079690333],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986266,0.00079876283,0.00008649325,0.00015228977,0.00021096833,0.00012482594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860393,0.01132236,0.00096146343,0.0008150642,0.000566485,0.00029526567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005629251,0.0009525088,0.0007607968,0.0016686624,0.00038214217,0.0020598853,0.0014189943,0.0018012705,0.0027625102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024405701,0.0006568221,0.0009907963,0.0008995969,0.0010268928,0.0031098924,0.0013426745,0.001875847,0.00026275037],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020207568,0.00009268536,0.0036620765,0.000018427998,0.00006104817,0.000015353064,0.00002335481,0.9873498,0.00020838183,0.006078324,0.00008143075,0.0023888838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009067782,0.000019414738,0.000512514,0.000005998321,0.000015527095,0.000004350479,0.000018648445,0.99032706,0.00012878352,0.008840111,0.00011146953,0.000006970162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010242742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008577741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010242742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022962508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021555657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029770732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211164177","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109484","title":"Spatial mismatch in diversity facets reveals contrasting protection for New Zealand's cetacean biodiversity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Ministry for Primary Industries; Royal Society Te Apārangi; Department of Conservation, New Zealand","keywords":"Biodiversity; Species richness; Phylogenetic diversity; Biodiversity hotspot; Ecology; Geography; Endangered species; Species diversity; Marine protected area; Biology; Phylogenetic tree; Habitat","score_opus":0.08867325908653811,"score_gpt":0.23988047874993773,"score_spread":0.15120721966339962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211164177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959021,0.00050037587,0.0003106336,0.0001675554,0.0000044738954,0.000004247972,0.00025544665,0.0000062183112,0.0028488846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999015,0.00016555474,0.00019259818,0.00003235504,0.000003520649,0.0000032706205,0.0001314181,0.000003855953,0.00045226255],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997377,0.000025230456,0.000017222585,0.0000950103,0.000067851724,0.000056952566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937314,0.00010291356,0.00026312223,0.000056946243,0.000113306225,0.00009056453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041774643,0.0001469002,0.0002385267,0.0013038359,0.00051442947,0.0010237498,0.0002957622,0.00031462478,0.003254039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014683778,0.00020734624,0.0002504648,0.0016598151,0.00093303545,0.00069495523,0.0012529405,0.00033829373,0.00020501412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025572948,0.000020500262,0.94724846,0.00009958653,0.00021464683,0.00010286843,0.0027395438,0.00030420686,0.019105958,0.0005304953,0.0004917417,0.028886205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.3495215e-7,0.000008316444,0.9988109,0.0000039608785,0.0000075625303,0.000022595532,0.00071057765,0.000050836552,0.000070296155,0.0000816874,0.00023086093,0.0000016528634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1032875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26991898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1032875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095317926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046453066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20537263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220903545","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109523","title":"Using community science data to help identify threatened species occurrences outside of known ranges","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Threatened species; Citizen science; Rare species; Geography; Species distribution; Range (aeronautics); Extinction (optical mineralogy); Environmental niche modelling; Ecology; Global biodiversity; Environmental data; Land cover; Biodiversity; Data deficient; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Environmental science; Land use; Biology","score_opus":0.5371347070871427,"score_gpt":0.39638696071927976,"score_spread":0.14074774636786297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220903545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5970045,0.001247604,0.07468007,0.0045831134,0.0005598251,0.0018717621,0.18904197,0.0017775872,0.12923366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78669244,0.00066623965,0.1263758,0.000670416,0.00013624152,0.0013325302,0.077539556,0.00018520649,0.0064014685],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967801,0.0009077381,0.0004949502,0.0004301117,0.001164811,0.00022227944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9655231,0.010106934,0.008443166,0.0034725098,0.0105583025,0.0018960146],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044134897,0.00041347137,0.00039992674,0.016292349,0.0010773527,0.0014783385,0.00103661,0.00053070806,0.010540001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027044361,0.00029068807,0.0003408725,0.010276727,0.00032596494,0.0023716572,0.0016898343,0.00074287556,0.002230162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022666287,0.00034348966,0.7009459,0.0010597105,0.00045295968,0.00032936287,0.001887974,0.00309338,0.0048411335,0.0039150184,0.04961196,0.23329248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011317262,0.00018162625,0.7653373,0.0011568204,0.00033948725,0.0006144316,0.008288592,0.027061198,0.0057992917,0.016971702,0.1739788,0.00015750554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04244919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14108391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9989634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010136646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021275277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08440417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226021556","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109535","title":"Research priorities for the conservation of chondrichthyans in Latin America","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología; Instituto Politécnico Nacional","keywords":"Geography; Latin Americans; Fishery; Biology; Political science","score_opus":0.11273432541697277,"score_gpt":0.3286652372522851,"score_spread":0.21593091183531232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226021556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34836608,0.24444735,0.004946468,0.2787211,0.0017404685,0.00023243301,0.0015264038,0.00019942614,0.1198203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88036793,0.080783814,0.012228223,0.013395545,0.0007124946,0.00026437227,0.0010012325,0.000049884053,0.011196479],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993882,0.00027083376,0.000036030055,0.000060077615,0.00005195483,0.0001929872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731463,0.0005941077,0.00037652938,0.00012831198,0.0008901683,0.0006963071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002421911,0.00044975444,0.00059714867,0.0013914143,0.001783735,0.002165451,0.00080407667,0.0012547605,0.0086887255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031013757,0.00012234655,0.00035524843,0.0020747,0.0019585197,0.0015876793,0.0016695156,0.0012259334,0.0003850409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009309978,0.00020837499,0.21393958,0.0057762335,0.00036022064,0.0019049695,0.013754668,0.0018942305,0.019846682,0.12069178,0.026002225,0.59468997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013944124,0.00025751823,0.40679663,0.010819999,0.0005096396,0.0013128284,0.060484786,0.0011258667,0.0019607337,0.047682814,0.46882987,0.00007987882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08867431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12918389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08867431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004421996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017539507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17631632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280504041","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109584","title":"The normative postulate problem: Hidden values in ecology, evolution, and conservation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Normative; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Biodiversity; Ecology; Computer science; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.030490410850881316,"score_gpt":0.23594392942048956,"score_spread":0.20545351856960825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280504041","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0367902,0.006312943,0.3368922,0.32846355,0.0018002363,0.00007297211,0.00036451133,0.00018279435,0.2891206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9398992,0.0026847261,0.03366427,0.010837761,0.0018945595,0.00027375782,0.00013343622,0.00011319833,0.01049899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910336,0.0054003163,0.00031881427,0.0009184356,0.0019921162,0.0003366849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9680061,0.025079578,0.0011065976,0.0031071873,0.0020539681,0.0006466387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02048153,0.00063113123,0.0011829591,0.0015626715,0.0037612768,0.00787201,0.0028915862,0.006558664,0.0068188505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03608419,0.00062985613,0.00086414826,0.0016208452,0.044668436,0.020206172,0.0038414416,0.011121741,0.0008047263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037209547,0.000004288049,0.000042287513,0.00000844306,0.0000026535185,0.0000071738195,0.00012548006,0.00012102705,0.000011904331,0.9982273,0.0006101193,0.0008356259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003915858,9.975068e-7,0.000020676165,0.000009881969,0.0000013657636,0.000007247151,0.000048642614,0.00030221918,0.000016778486,0.9982494,0.0013372448,0.000001689985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024127227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020610255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02048153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051822686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054323385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10831797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280594854","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109597","title":"Ruling the roost: Avian species reclaim urban habitat during India's COVID-19 lockdown","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Geography; Habitat; Threatened species; Species richness; Wildlife; Ecology; Population; Environmental protection; Biology","score_opus":0.06026150002579722,"score_gpt":0.2604410278643768,"score_spread":0.20017952783857956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280594854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826134,0.00010040262,0.00008080928,0.0014530021,0.00009597585,0.00001984635,0.00017269986,0.00002121547,0.015442696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98858774,0.000077849065,0.00010903457,0.00044525976,0.000020177427,0.000010980482,0.00009041723,0.000008722869,0.010649908],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999587,0.000041016465,0.000008409986,0.000028059074,0.00004750272,0.00028790557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935097,0.0000745645,0.00013179761,0.00005034472,0.000105378975,0.0002869159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003235586,0.00014273872,0.00009885044,0.0005524515,0.004078299,0.0016061654,0.00080631947,0.00072706136,0.006693751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011010235,0.00013026662,0.00016147096,0.00048419417,0.0014199628,0.0005004761,0.0018152697,0.0015789533,0.0007512151],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041021698,0.0002873052,0.68200386,0.00021565046,0.00005602113,0.007447714,0.18423699,0.00038579965,0.00736654,0.0076092673,0.031625655,0.07835496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004936038,0.000101300386,0.6929783,0.00008265579,0.000018638257,0.00072380755,0.24346958,0.00016611797,0.0006192112,0.00023867801,0.061570447,0.000026282776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16572584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53492445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16572584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017459831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023161252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32952237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282006037","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109595","title":"Scientists' warning of an imperiled ocean","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coastal and Marine Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Marine ecosystem; Biodiversity; Warning system; Fishing; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Greenhouse gas; Business; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Interim; Environmental protection; Geography; Fishery; Ecology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.021819453817702995,"score_gpt":0.22256186011769732,"score_spread":0.20074240629999432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282006037","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021476669,0.0015725319,0.00030561668,0.9326786,0.052246258,0.000009681534,0.00014321425,0.000043749034,0.010852773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035664823,0.0020377832,0.00092339684,0.8764127,0.044941142,0.000043722757,0.00017969034,0.00007881069,0.03971799],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659145,0.0011009583,0.0002649716,0.00032500812,0.0013528452,0.00036492018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832788,0.008852048,0.0013972189,0.0010077312,0.0038387426,0.0016254615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007294493,0.0006416084,0.00042438146,0.0012556824,0.0037551317,0.0040640016,0.0010903629,0.029670427,0.0056175054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0349096,0.00049030676,0.0008570796,0.0006884857,0.0043078163,0.0035217663,0.0026670317,0.030598579,0.0020255502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009975737,0.000023529754,0.0011582454,0.00008313439,0.000024387777,0.0004891255,0.0010119202,0.00011201454,0.0004573982,0.009286828,0.97795826,0.009295418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040377414,0.000039710045,0.0013333776,0.00017066809,0.000027924056,0.00019730857,0.0010601946,0.000108354514,0.00053038273,0.008075433,0.98838836,0.00002788217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009169228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012774778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029670427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019410519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005473797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038577437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283457000","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109633","title":"Conservation assessment of raptors within the USA and Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"BirdLife International; M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Threatened species; Endangered species; Conservation status; Geography; Critically endangered; Near-threatened species; Population; Conservation-dependent species; CITES; Wildlife; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.036385941249101016,"score_gpt":0.2555790989318526,"score_spread":0.21919315768275158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283457000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99067783,0.0007576725,0.0002432373,0.00031792573,0.0000106348625,0.000036732094,0.0011747563,0.00001785579,0.0067634094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960471,0.0004235594,0.00052177085,0.00007727921,0.0000042502475,0.000013299382,0.00073489186,0.000004287101,0.0021736617],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917644,0.00010678619,0.00002547536,0.00007758029,0.00038169642,0.00023192429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702793,0.00012957987,0.00029351292,0.000052916806,0.002113041,0.00038305786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089952745,0.00019071111,0.00020305587,0.0021576027,0.0020365259,0.001072855,0.0009442146,0.00030703738,0.000882273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019824198,0.000121412966,0.00022346579,0.0025823002,0.00048075343,0.00031842547,0.0005850602,0.00032030104,0.000103309976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014993009,0.000044391545,0.94951844,0.000046674366,0.00012158614,0.00017577602,0.0014760417,0.0010383488,0.00050024025,0.00049545424,0.0036525258,0.042780537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037644131,0.000030135949,0.99134517,0.00003392683,0.000046973946,0.00008923989,0.0038526992,0.0013110605,0.00015300198,0.000036632748,0.003090812,0.000006541423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98152256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99608177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01847744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010674307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013352773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07744795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288422072","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109675","title":"Strong phenological shifts among bumblebee species in North America can help predict extinction risk","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phenology; Bumblebee; Climate change; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Ecology; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Pollinator; Pollination","score_opus":0.07155739258975387,"score_gpt":0.20178095391666698,"score_spread":0.1302235613269131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288422072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99904186,0.0001243816,0.000109394554,0.00005553392,0.0000030197918,0.0000032318733,0.000067756664,0.0000042313277,0.0005907267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995333,0.00006463201,0.00016174819,0.000023877137,0.000003865906,0.000003752439,0.00007753572,0.0000013521037,0.0001299796],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992764,0.000022021533,0.0000032635028,0.000016719805,0.000009958634,0.000020393296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949086,0.00013769919,0.00018926273,0.000019833418,0.00005312473,0.00010919517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024336067,0.0001584882,0.0001066537,0.00091884384,0.0004935782,0.00033967156,0.00016654794,0.00022203477,0.0017383132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011673683,0.0001062033,0.00008170502,0.00034312054,0.00024447325,0.00045346053,0.00028704366,0.00027309606,0.000117458076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007037758,0.000037530197,0.9862389,0.000017460388,0.000032256376,0.00003362716,0.00041444838,0.00019616768,0.0026717298,0.00005083912,0.00030384577,0.009932859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.922745e-7,0.0000075381045,0.9995129,0.000002083336,0.0000030766757,0.00000764032,0.0001404373,0.00015220762,0.000024638335,0.000030033118,0.00011782957,8.0208235e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02993298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17353067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02993298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004180253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013535819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059517503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309306996","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109815","title":"Past and present effects of habitat amount and fragmentation per se on plant species richness, composition and traits in a deforestation hotspot","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva","keywords":"Species richness; Habitat fragmentation; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat; Forest fragmentation; Hotspot (geology); Deforestation (computer science); Ecology; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.01823267879601456,"score_gpt":0.22661688292872142,"score_spread":0.20838420413270686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309306996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99942553,0.00022769897,0.000046149646,0.000034743447,0.0000027150852,7.078266e-7,0.0000830597,0.0000016845459,0.00017761682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995982,0.00009371943,0.000058053636,0.000012535346,0.0000075571243,0.000001204117,0.00012824997,0.0000012277934,0.000099390025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996704,0.00012837783,0.000029762794,0.0000907891,0.000030135003,0.000050571132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977265,0.00077287765,0.0006935627,0.0002090065,0.00014762126,0.00045050867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012954312,0.0002062234,0.00025905969,0.00045530093,0.00034391813,0.000721459,0.0003236425,0.00040642702,0.0013357933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017984948,0.00019991718,0.0004723751,0.00047114404,0.0008380824,0.0004658132,0.00037442512,0.0003923076,0.00013001793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022045363,0.000045959914,0.99576,0.000014762826,0.00013755121,0.00004541355,0.00009236204,0.0004354347,0.0018723661,0.000055910787,0.000026920241,0.0012929105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.871031e-7,0.00003116719,0.99956995,0.0000015197537,0.000012296318,0.000024671486,0.00003588396,0.0002204577,0.00004848807,0.000016972594,0.000036012352,0.0000017204733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007356815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02032443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007356815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054486154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001911249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014627993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309342704","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109817","title":"Centres of neo- and paleo-endemism for Chinese woody flora and their environmental features","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Endemism; China; Geography; Biodiversity; Ecology; Clade; Flora (microbiology); Biology; Phylogenetic tree; Paleontology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01245270705296909,"score_gpt":0.214994403861205,"score_spread":0.20254169680823592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309342704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99806815,0.00014626015,0.000077745026,0.000025749743,0.0000023025975,0.0000068004542,0.00007659271,0.0000039648694,0.0015925211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995005,0.000064190084,0.00007233837,0.00000461057,0.0000034926268,0.0000055212154,0.00007859995,0.0000019781498,0.00026877402],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967706,0.00003273795,0.000032017353,0.00008697586,0.000055881235,0.000115292765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926525,0.00011744657,0.00018348578,0.000048413785,0.00014378676,0.00024169915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004379533,0.00022055482,0.0002644367,0.0035852392,0.0013176999,0.0009443122,0.00043279814,0.000152385,0.0020237793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007125465,0.00021709148,0.00023644604,0.003170896,0.0012179919,0.0005932667,0.0009381657,0.0002045075,0.00012297499],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013359141,0.000032059557,0.9746431,0.00004998073,0.000075716416,0.00021272126,0.006383132,0.00014264903,0.003566631,0.003091284,0.00019461846,0.0114744445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033361043,0.000010992071,0.99805224,0.0000035750854,0.0000148541985,0.000052601074,0.0012025525,0.00009409799,0.00006746932,0.00024992682,0.00024434688,0.0000040545074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017129682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055052985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017129682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013183422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013345794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03405994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312085161","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109841","title":"Smaller human populations are neither a necessary nor sufficient condition for biodiversity conservation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Natural resource economics; Population; Agricultural biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Consumption (sociology); Measurement of biodiversity; Business; Sustainability; Environmental resource management; Economics; Ecosystem; Ecology; Biodiversity conservation; Biology","score_opus":0.13639407314324664,"score_gpt":0.3244862043690152,"score_spread":0.18809213122576857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312085161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80416715,0.0025146632,0.020958329,0.016194848,0.00085575494,0.00020939502,0.0040694326,0.00026179446,0.15076861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914288,0.0005552044,0.0035495874,0.0008443851,0.00024105515,0.00010037124,0.0005715706,0.000035859393,0.0026730641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913377,0.00018948907,0.00009997064,0.00027341937,0.00016229435,0.00014108758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911169,0.004002076,0.002104271,0.0009986764,0.0005304787,0.0012476395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012506888,0.00023797539,0.0007285477,0.00093600445,0.0014299415,0.001180472,0.00073440204,0.0013143959,0.042111527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008452942,0.00030560666,0.00042221055,0.00066534115,0.004316528,0.00298817,0.0015715648,0.0011512669,0.0024630176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002211711,0.0008407471,0.29730743,0.003085507,0.0006246841,0.004303531,0.0022298614,0.0074572954,0.057663687,0.43590716,0.030350327,0.15801814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038194572,0.001222502,0.43063608,0.00065075833,0.0002946185,0.0127009405,0.009040569,0.0054220217,0.01654688,0.42529023,0.09765133,0.00016224019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001098189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017097294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042111527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044206736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009848854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14087707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313594739","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109883","title":"The application gap: Genomics for biodiversity and ecosystem service management","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Horizon 2020; Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; Centro Singular de Investigación de Galicia; Xunta de Galicia; European Regional Development Fund; European Commission; Gutenberg Forschungskolleg; Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS; Generalitat Valenciana; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; European Cooperation in Science and Technology","keywords":"Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Environmental resource management; Business; Genomics; Environmental planning; Ecosystem; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Genome; Economics","score_opus":0.05297404862478753,"score_gpt":0.2245489782368269,"score_spread":0.17157492961203938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313594739","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017039404,0.37699723,0.025875976,0.5431402,0.01630522,0.00010518808,0.00033257974,0.00033386803,0.03520589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045017496,0.524883,0.051710293,0.34152284,0.019508315,0.0003420092,0.00084055855,0.00048481295,0.015690692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904371,0.0052362666,0.00062381744,0.0011234456,0.0018921361,0.0006872824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9655704,0.027020495,0.0009453529,0.0015646528,0.002885148,0.0020140156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019490153,0.00096886675,0.0013713372,0.0018704286,0.0014971538,0.0077966875,0.0020416249,0.012340812,0.008919292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02520783,0.00039885915,0.0010571192,0.002624446,0.008153051,0.01814605,0.0070816437,0.01253611,0.002923903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001070802,0.000047838974,0.000606295,0.0038099512,0.00005198049,0.00036341618,0.0015605588,0.00080736936,0.0022072946,0.511633,0.15815744,0.32064787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009058027,0.00006185417,0.0003849074,0.0025763444,0.0000177104,0.00037897608,0.00068699627,0.00031251519,0.00035129336,0.14980355,0.84538114,0.000035763198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027279893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00195672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019490153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048319404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009076498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10307503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321485702","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109963","title":"Prioritizing taxa for genetic reference database development to advance inland water conservation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal; McGill Genome Centre; Concordia University; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi; Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; McGill University","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Groupe de recherche interuniversitaire en limnologie; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Genome Canada","keywords":"Barcode; Biodiversity; Taxon; Workflow; DNA barcoding; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biology; Endangered species; Water resources; Data deficient; Geography; Database; Business; Habitat; Computer science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.08702657531650097,"score_gpt":0.26751403383398475,"score_spread":0.18048745851748377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321485702","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21840659,0.01205582,0.5302854,0.008138233,0.0016965836,0.0027990267,0.14648801,0.011735397,0.06839494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12641896,0.0020850257,0.7427852,0.0012955829,0.00014250712,0.0008675044,0.11902104,0.0015345337,0.0058496348],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917355,0.0022397481,0.0012783511,0.0017273234,0.002333485,0.0006855136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752586,0.0040888092,0.003260045,0.0040356526,0.012220186,0.001136632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019066919,0.0009158598,0.001163357,0.013360842,0.002823332,0.0055970675,0.003696388,0.0011042957,0.008958451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040730514,0.00061281415,0.000833357,0.014279337,0.0007363647,0.004040754,0.004002363,0.0017204169,0.004586996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073171983,0.00033102895,0.16968296,0.0033874207,0.00045225758,0.001189021,0.008702985,0.0042370693,0.07377634,0.026173905,0.09536717,0.61596817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013989423,0.00022296609,0.1705011,0.0032827684,0.00048164718,0.0014284432,0.0077632493,0.01929817,0.04099251,0.01711671,0.73853356,0.0002389234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08373593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24722983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08373593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037434765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015197603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16649711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322102689","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109932","title":"The application of assisted migration as a climate change adaptation tactic: An evidence map and synthesis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; University of British Columbia; Carleton University","funders":"W. Garfield Weston Foundation; Parks Canada","keywords":"Threatened species; Climate change; Reforestation; Ecology; Geography; Environmental resource management; Population; Taxon; Adaptation (eye); Range (aeronautics); Environmental planning; Biology; Habitat; Environmental science","score_opus":0.20940853873194626,"score_gpt":0.3243535062937181,"score_spread":0.11494496756177186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322102689","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030698007,0.89938825,0.010090254,0.035716593,0.0017714343,0.0018083877,0.004329527,0.00007329259,0.01612418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41311675,0.5601165,0.015490371,0.006573368,0.001203486,0.0013628474,0.0014267756,0.000041635667,0.0006681438],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.955938,0.0237958,0.01023145,0.0030459813,0.006023131,0.0009656434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6638447,0.27328363,0.0288448,0.005959348,0.026478289,0.0015892935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06698002,0.0021348088,0.0042068316,0.014607705,0.0013497769,0.006089825,0.0048588812,0.004811012,0.009933783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18359281,0.0010069294,0.0031940206,0.017136522,0.0046141823,0.0060816947,0.004173767,0.0048060203,0.00088737486],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040155863,0.00046116943,0.061311867,0.26429063,0.017832104,0.000669992,0.0017161007,0.006191455,0.0008065108,0.025723752,0.009936639,0.6070443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021812527,0.0041123126,0.1572256,0.5561222,0.091845706,0.0014410018,0.009112872,0.008720149,0.0028135928,0.046829384,0.119120166,0.00047577737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017074773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03225649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06698002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007753875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012146809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35422844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322762476","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109968","title":"Stealth advocacy in ecology and conservation biology","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Credibility; Science policy; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Political science; Environmental policy; Citizen science; Environmental ethics; Ecosystem services; Public relations; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biology; Computer science; Public administration; Economics; Ecosystem; Law","score_opus":0.09634383610432856,"score_gpt":0.30683132725640466,"score_spread":0.2104874911520761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322762476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041411646,0.014816358,0.008579788,0.37235445,0.0051360964,0.000021941738,0.000051206163,0.000048771606,0.55757976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9025188,0.005652597,0.0015216558,0.046852592,0.0042548818,0.00005355105,0.000029200735,0.000057384485,0.039059304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940315,0.0033758439,0.00015726457,0.00047597068,0.0012444289,0.00071502506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96297807,0.028677123,0.0022292868,0.001501536,0.001927718,0.002686138],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013143265,0.0003917222,0.00052753196,0.0025043446,0.0054806573,0.0072044213,0.00075697224,0.010434308,0.020945428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033010513,0.00026053324,0.00027331253,0.001915765,0.020841803,0.009205473,0.006667965,0.008909489,0.0009457862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027902619,0.000051950585,0.0027999836,0.00007666005,0.000020528592,0.00014986482,0.0026829836,0.00029355288,0.00014391166,0.91683435,0.03491172,0.042006724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027071073,0.000030400013,0.0030815112,0.00058579264,0.000021940035,0.00017728072,0.0037755554,0.0010725495,0.00022854458,0.7724228,0.2185519,0.000024656136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002594047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005162647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98685676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029819796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021328877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07006943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323654667","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109994","title":"Quantifying annual spatial consistency in chick-rearing seabirds to inform important site identification","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"British Antarctic Survey; European Regional Development Fund; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Natural Environment Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Bureau of Ocean Energy Management; Institut écologie et environnement; Darwin Initiative; Horizon 2020; Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, UK Government; Ministry for Primary Industries; BirdLife Australia; Research Executive Agency; Deakin University; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Korea Polar Research Institute; Sight Research UK; Leverhulme Trust; Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Department of Conservation, New Zealand; European Commission; Natural England; Institut Polaire Français Paul Emile Victor; H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; Government of the United Kingdom; MAVA Foundation; National Science Foundation; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique","keywords":"Sampling (signal processing); Population; Seabird; Geography; Tracking (education); Consistency (knowledge bases); Sample (material); Distribution (mathematics); Ecology; Spatial distribution; Identification (biology); Global Positioning System; Sampling design; Species distribution; Statistics; Habitat; Computer science; Biology; Remote sensing; Demography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.061225043005638156,"score_gpt":0.2872878581494832,"score_spread":0.22606281514384505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323654667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98764926,0.0006043415,0.0093280105,0.000032907585,0.000019361949,0.000015194337,0.00092336955,0.00006584246,0.0013617883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994521,0.00012742601,0.004513379,0.00001489067,0.000011822594,0.000013309117,0.00065463746,0.000013611876,0.00012988846],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991553,0.0002998047,0.00009229972,0.00025288426,0.000118224176,0.00008145477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941916,0.001855966,0.0022341274,0.00073251344,0.00077599165,0.00020972136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002828523,0.0002250296,0.0002799805,0.002282866,0.00031969484,0.00083973317,0.00039955176,0.00020644924,0.00077044143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067848214,0.00019437322,0.00024412596,0.0014226036,0.00032411868,0.00085528346,0.00064951123,0.0002670746,0.00024320178],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022179796,0.000014400814,0.98115027,0.000042754553,0.00012059101,0.000020382831,0.0003241798,0.0013070086,0.0023932206,0.00010057555,0.00023885336,0.01426562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.0970864e-7,0.000017903909,0.9966059,0.000010845504,0.00002423896,0.000065034685,0.00022505467,0.0020799036,0.00035281206,0.00010242873,0.00050875696,0.000006409554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007568053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030300656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007568053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002936062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028024623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015048027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361291658","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110028","title":"Life-cycle analysis of an endangered migratory goose to assess the impact of conservation actions on population recovery","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Framsenteret; Miljødirektoratet; Norges Forskningsråd; European Commission","keywords":"Endangered species; Population; Culling; Geography; Minimum viable population; Population viability analysis; Goose; Ecology; Population growth; Critically endangered; Habitat; Fishery; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.1280935909909795,"score_gpt":0.35080412195777255,"score_spread":0.22271053096679305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361291658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99455947,0.000059657254,0.0043922546,0.00003155292,0.000004210094,0.000015574504,0.00034609105,0.000020786209,0.0005702954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983407,0.000022214974,0.00095105096,0.000010248151,0.0000016973988,0.00001497303,0.00040282132,0.000004554451,0.00025168483],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992275,0.000030460977,0.0000041632456,0.000018681787,0.000006354146,0.00001765532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996132,0.00018142302,0.00007031587,0.000037181293,0.000052220938,0.000045718596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054382,0.00023576574,0.00028951894,0.00044726513,0.00020461339,0.0002962069,0.000364859,0.0003309355,0.0016365016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011817039,0.00013814536,0.0005618765,0.00027966144,0.00017626431,0.00026489797,0.00023203925,0.00023836097,0.000112180394],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001540249,0.00015415953,0.163225,0.000051584353,0.00032478463,0.00015427454,0.000101157966,0.82209176,0.003871935,0.002173943,0.00051569723,0.007181682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008646776,0.00012959032,0.059734423,0.000004812229,0.00004802402,0.000037046335,0.000059811562,0.9387605,0.00029538237,0.0005423232,0.00036850854,0.000010936743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032107692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026842501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032107692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005487386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047785247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06384158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365505797","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109942","title":"Geographic and taxonomic variation in adaptive capacity among mountain-dwelling small mammals: Implications for conservation status and actions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia; Parks Canada","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Pika; Climate change; Interspecific competition; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Biology; Species distribution; Population; Geography; Habitat; National park","score_opus":0.1806573585992158,"score_gpt":0.2766001784568188,"score_spread":0.09594281985760297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365505797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990621,0.00017030536,0.00017917686,0.0000574112,0.0000011512287,0.0000033410217,0.000035278885,0.000002499598,0.00048864016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975604,0.000036104724,0.00013474627,0.000009230068,0.0000021799428,0.0000020894706,0.000029681863,6.577683e-7,0.000029277253],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953365,0.0001861876,0.000029503579,0.00014657078,0.00005802022,0.00004606335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983032,0.0005190968,0.00064169074,0.00014978286,0.00018533944,0.00020099495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013607331,0.00018834112,0.00025506355,0.0013666461,0.00054713886,0.0007937291,0.0004699879,0.00028419288,0.0012938435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002573054,0.00013123499,0.00023195386,0.0010944819,0.001248503,0.00096826005,0.0008754343,0.0003315393,0.00008024334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005159956,0.00003096471,0.98594576,0.000027972605,0.00011406157,0.00003658716,0.0013422857,0.00021667905,0.00246611,0.00027256628,0.000041412328,0.009454022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.196378e-7,0.000017893342,0.9991135,0.0000029469063,0.000006982665,0.000014833182,0.0005216482,0.00015837474,0.000030981624,0.00008411083,0.00004662714,0.0000015884123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067835525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01164594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067835525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029766743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022243969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013488114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366259819","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110053","title":"Smaller human populations are still not a necessary condition for biodiversity conservation: A response to Cafaro et al. (2023)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Geography; Conservation status; Population; Nocturnal; Apex predator; Persecution; Biodiversity; Predation; Ecosystem; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.2499659711601985,"score_gpt":0.3601651491358934,"score_spread":0.11019917797569492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366259819","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000798116,0.0014496793,0.00022552627,0.9882119,0.008386228,0.000008437493,0.0000949228,0.000018642007,0.00080658455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010250961,0.0027233153,0.0017282122,0.967451,0.014116186,0.000054576223,0.00008859246,0.000051418323,0.0035356812],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877022,0.004215905,0.0009663745,0.001990975,0.004180846,0.00094374496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88409007,0.06905545,0.005986015,0.0029549464,0.030017296,0.007896241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029460274,0.0011455532,0.0011514719,0.0016314348,0.007437033,0.007729454,0.00440316,0.031204201,0.009093687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08497705,0.00072983955,0.0012240794,0.002386788,0.0072206906,0.0064636734,0.0047654808,0.03713561,0.003371477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071573915,0.00002985139,0.0018913635,0.00017883422,0.000045014025,0.00024117575,0.0016874836,0.00008962573,0.00020975043,0.0041036075,0.96814317,0.02330856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059580692,0.00008610383,0.008591341,0.0014316478,0.00008144795,0.00076625176,0.012053539,0.00043631924,0.00078338,0.014772221,0.96079874,0.00013937562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037080076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09194024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037080076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062533133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014402695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15580267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367056360","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110041","title":"The changing dynamics of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1: Next steps for management &amp; science in North America","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Influenza Virus Research Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Influenza A virus subtype H5N1; Wildlife; Epizootic; Outbreak; Geography; Context (archaeology); Pandemic; Biosecurity; Wildlife disease; Ebola virus; Archipelago; Highly pathogenic; Biology; Socioeconomics; Ecology; Zoology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Disease; Virus; Virology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine","score_opus":0.17917575838934924,"score_gpt":0.3848711095427129,"score_spread":0.20569535115336368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367056360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.346117,0.23091309,0.0124356095,0.33419988,0.0025659364,0.0003222877,0.030355575,0.0007615906,0.04232899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6334165,0.23577,0.055984337,0.038548235,0.002300681,0.00034813923,0.02598984,0.0001375019,0.007504759],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988488,0.00028798392,0.0001521191,0.00023224123,0.0003297315,0.0001490463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99487513,0.0010404283,0.001128435,0.00028641126,0.002105841,0.00056370813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033292465,0.00039948893,0.0004611151,0.0020943964,0.0014691268,0.0034287747,0.0009809971,0.0011330006,0.0026444558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039413273,0.00021180011,0.0006115003,0.0036181305,0.00094770663,0.003447919,0.0014654624,0.0013397888,0.00039876293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014471893,0.00016805247,0.37601095,0.0030102476,0.00028577688,0.00056784437,0.0043347483,0.0015396607,0.0055034533,0.0038410204,0.10119797,0.5033955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016479691,0.00015038102,0.6936663,0.0027997568,0.00023256619,0.00041543672,0.012077446,0.003230148,0.001084554,0.0072160866,0.2790026,0.000108314765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2847125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49780786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2847125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005040081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011020523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56611055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376253596","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110084","title":"Functional connectivity of an imperilled Arctic ungulate – where melting sea ice and human trails increase isolation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ecology; Habitat; Landscape connectivity; Threatened species; Metapopulation; Arctic; Disturbance (geology); Climate change; Geography; Biology; Population; Biological dispersal","score_opus":0.05632415244495466,"score_gpt":0.2694772303350172,"score_spread":0.21315307789006255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376253596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862249,0.00081854325,0.00067902025,0.0002445415,0.00001579944,0.000004129537,0.0004925967,0.000021678205,0.011498768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971552,0.00056026323,0.0007497619,0.0000376409,0.000015821703,0.0000041991116,0.0005207907,0.000011276441,0.0009449832],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99994457,0.000010810455,0.0000024371927,0.000014697465,0.000007124025,0.000020433275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999887,0.000021793045,0.000029185076,0.000006034685,0.000024263118,0.0000316295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000110153196,0.00014731415,0.00011333744,0.001048771,0.0007596163,0.00061585533,0.00026038845,0.00025104792,0.002950037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003513388,0.00007091423,0.000119418066,0.0010815529,0.0004469542,0.00042186878,0.0006025065,0.00020231339,0.0002389321],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005849095,0.00007322471,0.8073316,0.0003283268,0.00021823576,0.003931105,0.011216055,0.0054522166,0.014594153,0.007813073,0.007302861,0.14115427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003825682,0.00006542768,0.9758911,0.00011960355,0.000053017044,0.0019449627,0.0058627464,0.0020411394,0.00033526056,0.002284939,0.011382184,0.000015849784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037345473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10249109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037345473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032662597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025187866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07425618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378223408","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110134","title":"Assessing the effectiveness of potential protected areas and OECMs in conserving biodiversity against subsurface resource extraction impacts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Convention on Biological Diversity; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental planning; Biodiversity conservation; Business; Resource management (computing); Protected area; Environmental science; Ecology; Computer science","score_opus":0.024814548447544552,"score_gpt":0.25043373830804183,"score_spread":0.22561918986049728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378223408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915207,0.00016637974,0.0020704416,0.0002158842,0.000008500029,0.0000749466,0.00026698544,0.000016703083,0.005659533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99816704,0.00004474892,0.0014305834,0.000010768117,0.0000022783922,0.000022617669,0.000058037283,0.0000016378093,0.00026237746],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975132,0.0014182082,0.000091606096,0.00017654659,0.00044518488,0.0003553262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891629,0.007468576,0.0013401948,0.00046761963,0.00085554953,0.00070509233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052717235,0.00048135367,0.00037335153,0.0015550503,0.00041191545,0.0016025832,0.0007403218,0.0008214806,0.0025851377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015963413,0.00019299444,0.00042003553,0.0011960628,0.00094622787,0.002202737,0.001396681,0.00047009502,0.00011247977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042357827,0.0014383802,0.35334215,0.00038694488,0.0007464019,0.0002766027,0.00022785041,0.47714955,0.0036866472,0.013290124,0.00070843013,0.1445111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035256761,0.008509964,0.43721125,0.0002219597,0.0008343834,0.00025461736,0.0031875393,0.52301806,0.005804254,0.01569617,0.004842951,0.0000662781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074114627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014845471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074114627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017019276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014716225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027879834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385621311","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110223","title":"Quantifying and overcoming Darwinian shortfalls to conserve the fish tree of life","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish biology, ecology, and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Clade; Phylogenetic tree; Supertree; Biology; Phylogenetics; Biodiversity; Taxonomic rank; Tree of life (biology); Optimal distinctiveness theory; Prioritization; Evolutionary biology; Ecology; Zoology; Geography; Business; Taxon","score_opus":0.13502632778915324,"score_gpt":0.305493830202224,"score_spread":0.17046750241307074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385621311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9309559,0.0012878648,0.052841693,0.005449097,0.0001066947,0.000039159782,0.00012880373,0.000071515264,0.009119336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922043,0.00012222034,0.0070505785,0.00012979157,0.000016114947,0.000009030369,0.000027693872,0.000021010539,0.0004192723],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989625,0.00052074814,0.000038131006,0.00017602599,0.00019943278,0.00010307396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99588984,0.0021553251,0.00082719576,0.00035387534,0.00047360593,0.00030019105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004320229,0.0002807889,0.00031597988,0.00063706737,0.0006876336,0.0013699026,0.0006805015,0.0006772585,0.0017761885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0122138485,0.00018290436,0.00019498578,0.00055455155,0.0013177928,0.0025522062,0.001044584,0.0009874522,0.00010325768],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023358618,0.00029707322,0.41762766,0.0004706607,0.00067188346,0.000136569,0.001400457,0.19608092,0.01490224,0.12729585,0.007463763,0.23341937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029888859,0.00033676956,0.33604705,0.00014460622,0.00021812931,0.00023184184,0.0035005256,0.3474365,0.0051074377,0.2938552,0.013001414,0.000090716836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008295128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031371776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008295128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020220669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001988856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022847831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385634257","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110173","title":"Opportunities and challenges in Asian bee research and conservation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Distribution (mathematics); Citizen science; Food security; Political science; Geography; Environmental planning; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Biology","score_opus":0.7370289344110709,"score_gpt":0.3376321951891575,"score_spread":0.3993967392219134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385634257","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04317378,0.23522809,0.009526178,0.661888,0.007496304,0.000110651345,0.00041750618,0.00008961809,0.04206991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50050384,0.31901136,0.045034193,0.09958004,0.012887412,0.00056342175,0.0008005757,0.00010939432,0.02150984],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99252737,0.004290677,0.00059695554,0.0007192381,0.0007109987,0.0011548481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719026,0.012138399,0.0024774638,0.0023697615,0.006437854,0.0046739113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03146751,0.0006508962,0.0012325359,0.0020490198,0.0043126442,0.010442357,0.0025714391,0.0043236655,0.009397365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009737176,0.00032718698,0.0009969367,0.0048162164,0.008985896,0.013082453,0.0065406063,0.005449913,0.0015179745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031466264,0.0004198746,0.038034067,0.0075306264,0.00019044509,0.0020714821,0.044513974,0.0010603106,0.003804059,0.25152105,0.06968699,0.5808525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027016575,0.00032867648,0.021235192,0.0056810062,0.00012317371,0.0013943316,0.128683,0.0010798321,0.00096797006,0.19970988,0.6406401,0.00012980812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077967136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013040887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03146751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003146401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022179084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16641808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386174237","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110239","title":"Using culturally transmitted behavior to help delineate conservation units for species at risk","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Foraging; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Cultural transmission in animals; Social learning; Ecology; Cultural diversity; Diversity (politics); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Evolutionary biology; Psychology; Biology; Sociology; Genetics","score_opus":0.1523536837194594,"score_gpt":0.30822742814779885,"score_spread":0.15587374442833946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386174237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9472017,0.00065945624,0.034380067,0.0005902567,0.00007475266,0.00020791161,0.0009169877,0.00020201954,0.015766863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9050559,0.0005835407,0.09114644,0.00023862511,0.000025090292,0.00017490699,0.00069753645,0.000053133073,0.0020248173],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903995,0.00049895095,0.00009118613,0.00017917545,0.00013107505,0.00005957943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960914,0.0009285109,0.0018206906,0.0004089617,0.00045761786,0.00029269935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017528005,0.00054066954,0.00038527919,0.0025655117,0.00063968904,0.0016011053,0.0006075285,0.00052699575,0.0027629407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052188826,0.00019662704,0.00033504367,0.0013093842,0.0009182159,0.0012276582,0.001066286,0.00086137536,0.00069571997],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016832394,0.00024051992,0.77425146,0.0005031636,0.00031209856,0.00040765406,0.006530547,0.0025213822,0.03193971,0.0037843839,0.0010877692,0.17825304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000116490555,0.00034022794,0.9673536,0.00024790474,0.00012084817,0.0005391282,0.006139632,0.0063303243,0.0068959887,0.005122477,0.0067772516,0.00012098597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055567133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019057063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055567133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006823693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005897712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011048734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386350140","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110246","title":"A Canada-wide macro assessment of protected area connectivity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ministry of Environment; University of Guelph","funders":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; Mitacs; Weston Family Foundation","keywords":"Protected area; Indigenous; Geography; Habitat; Population; IUCN protected area categories; Government (linguistics); Biodiversity; Control area; Environmental resource management; Local government area; Environmental protection; Ecology; Local government; Control (management); Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.04356284533556022,"score_gpt":0.2670664524582015,"score_spread":0.22350360712264128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386350140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91043264,0.0006907033,0.0019017035,0.0007309459,0.000023491673,0.00016556862,0.05482213,0.00012494723,0.031107929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972614,0.00035357114,0.002932764,0.0001272202,0.000008352743,0.000073366486,0.014742751,0.00002604989,0.009121999],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993383,0.0000613432,0.000022282135,0.000087223365,0.00034542728,0.00014528184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723345,0.00010211176,0.0001956128,0.00006988944,0.0019262923,0.00047264475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072240015,0.00038249625,0.0002974144,0.0036817414,0.0017219548,0.0012366899,0.0005900408,0.00026237988,0.0023514805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017855272,0.00015262375,0.00029863731,0.0072777653,0.00026130167,0.0004784979,0.0010414356,0.00032757618,0.00037199454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020750744,0.00008950568,0.91130835,0.00005721866,0.0002803664,0.00012218632,0.0006028629,0.005439382,0.0008527592,0.0016371704,0.024374098,0.055028632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008078293,0.00003257459,0.9855334,0.000022961396,0.000041921005,0.000028857614,0.00064821524,0.004785459,0.00015712155,0.00016942828,0.008558118,0.000013896278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99047476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015724132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015724132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023365427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114087105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386384020","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110253","title":"Cattle ranchers' tolerance to jaguar revealed through a spectrum of intended behaviours across a gradient of losses in a gamified survey-based field experiment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Scottish Funding Council; Université de Sherbrooke","keywords":"Jaguar; Wildlife; Aposematism; Livelihood; Context (archaeology); Livestock; Wildlife conservation; Predation; Geography; Environmental resource management; Psychology; Ecology; Predator; Biology; Environmental science; Forestry","score_opus":0.06581552470160963,"score_gpt":0.315008934835251,"score_spread":0.24919341013364138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386384020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99985504,0.0000023655132,0.000021434447,0.0000036162282,5.632304e-7,0.0000039765314,0.000010679794,0.000001092038,0.00010115337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876827,0.00001020553,0.00017198788,0.000027069636,0.0000017275194,0.000035527737,0.00006004373,0.0000022866104,0.0009227405],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934167,0.00027625324,0.000023894858,0.00018977158,0.00004828091,0.00012013262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877757,0.00030233816,0.00024840527,0.00014999116,0.000085033935,0.00043670338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010978574,0.00038876943,0.00049720117,0.0006007663,0.00078996987,0.0007779796,0.00039589015,0.0006929751,0.0016110934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001547676,0.00043755982,0.00024885783,0.00021641071,0.0009355872,0.0005396,0.00049939577,0.0009118915,0.00031139178],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018659737,0.02391416,0.81227124,0.000053685893,0.00027947273,0.00035455794,0.00822085,0.00120063,0.12621912,0.00044396866,0.0004370649,0.007945385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006700192,0.008297797,0.9865154,0.0000059307536,0.000042629814,0.000085721535,0.0016784286,0.0010573185,0.001993904,0.000062568426,0.00017380982,0.000019476796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010780163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036661677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010780163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004201032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025113745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021434844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386819644","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110240","title":"Additional data confirms the impact of the COVID19 lockdown on the behavior and fattening of migratory snow geese","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada; Canada First Research Excellence Fund; Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; ArcticNet","keywords":"Goose; Snow; Wildlife; Population; Geography; Overgrazing; Arctic; Ecology; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Fishery; Biology; Grazing; Demography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.11050040947262707,"score_gpt":0.3061372544834171,"score_spread":0.19563684501079004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386819644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926051,0.000060837745,0.00034474817,0.00017380201,0.00005601435,0.00002989096,0.0023003242,0.000034582146,0.0043947115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97998327,0.000096809126,0.000999394,0.0005015654,0.000041995354,0.00012957977,0.0072197393,0.00004367176,0.010984086],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931705,0.000094329436,0.00004663424,0.0001616051,0.00015735245,0.00022304695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962991,0.0007242359,0.00072099146,0.0006566568,0.0008176072,0.00078138785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077661965,0.00036718362,0.0003867386,0.0007812883,0.001208041,0.0006443549,0.0004251392,0.0006274018,0.010173172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002000855,0.00012559402,0.000492313,0.0005313516,0.00046894726,0.00032102433,0.00066509953,0.0009364122,0.0011412068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040498185,0.0022572484,0.8408335,0.00013813298,0.00031596705,0.00091270026,0.00093921187,0.00045166689,0.10525355,0.0003907362,0.0058068177,0.038650602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014273414,0.0008410728,0.9897893,0.000009488524,0.00003511318,0.00011590483,0.0003961192,0.00009091256,0.0047371546,0.0000343953,0.0039268816,0.0000092761675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03543142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11359969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03543142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077606365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007895086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070450366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387199893","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110286","title":"Enabling a National Program for Ecological Corridors in Canada in support of biodiversity conservation, climate change adaptation, and Indigenous leadership","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Dalhousie University","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Biodiversity; Adaptation (eye); Biodiversity conservation; Geography; Environmental resource management; Climate change; Climate change adaptation; Ecology; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.18779101627820244,"score_gpt":0.26210700605494613,"score_spread":0.0743159897767437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387199893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43912083,0.0036439036,0.009202905,0.31005943,0.003849528,0.0051773796,0.005482196,0.0014990327,0.22196478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71360207,0.0024014562,0.033537,0.05764508,0.0002772934,0.0023488856,0.003238389,0.00014319093,0.18680659],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99503785,0.00040838815,0.00009011148,0.000189736,0.0011327703,0.0031410723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97421503,0.00060071715,0.00039865723,0.00033751293,0.0047253757,0.01972276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004646678,0.0003630278,0.00023384801,0.0011496986,0.013505544,0.003253586,0.0017876184,0.0021380873,0.0060903127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056413547,0.00037316402,0.00047461377,0.0008750165,0.001627942,0.00092941814,0.0057934835,0.0040773884,0.00046132915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036947345,0.0012675228,0.13344528,0.0004738856,0.00011951274,0.0014891599,0.010986106,0.0025627555,0.0074168104,0.03351818,0.5752031,0.23314825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026739878,0.00045348483,0.34242323,0.00048577128,0.00008824307,0.000432653,0.025728736,0.0029728208,0.0017400087,0.0026916417,0.62256044,0.00015560468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98446494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99673575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050153203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050153203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5264048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36388868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387306414","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110219","title":"The power of eDNA sampling to investigate the impact of Australian mega-fires on platypus occupancy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research; Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment","keywords":"Occupancy; Platypus; Fauna; Biodiversity; Monotreme; Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Ecology; Geography; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.08286396799299359,"score_gpt":0.3196802542334222,"score_spread":0.23681628624042864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387306414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9540855,0.0006963924,0.036833834,0.00024863455,0.00005738316,0.00013962,0.0023400208,0.00015067523,0.005447996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983017,0.00014788429,0.014856934,0.00022911477,0.0000148437975,0.0001295846,0.00091038353,0.000030637646,0.00066356134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959383,0.0019415695,0.000204834,0.0012294501,0.00047233934,0.00021356969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98791283,0.0063816016,0.0025601776,0.0016910157,0.00093693,0.00051745697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005497304,0.0006650055,0.00072816457,0.00089401833,0.0008790306,0.0011768026,0.00091482326,0.0007320205,0.0015318372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015275311,0.00062542985,0.00069639593,0.001352427,0.0009682753,0.0009943671,0.0017157503,0.001083453,0.00050663354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025495407,0.000117538795,0.9341469,0.00044688536,0.00069223903,0.00021056159,0.002535829,0.0070740716,0.013559719,0.001081704,0.00079543324,0.039084088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016015809,0.00026591663,0.96892345,0.00009255552,0.00023635555,0.00025939103,0.0008472492,0.020745644,0.001921451,0.0014357074,0.005216521,0.000039800154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020777367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044123683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020777367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072119536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007572384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041312873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387387437","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110313","title":"Conservation after biodiversity: An analysis of Michael E. Soulé's ‘What is Conservation Biology?’","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Normative; Biodiversity; Environmental ethics; Value (mathematics); Intrinsic value (animal ethics); Conservation biology; Dominion; Sociology; Biodiversity conservation; Ecology; Reading (process); Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07465019620160557,"score_gpt":0.27540679281930064,"score_spread":0.20075659661769507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387387437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03406335,0.018135734,0.017055882,0.43485197,0.0018571385,0.0001008283,0.00006818644,0.000030154884,0.49383673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8101332,0.0076539787,0.007272257,0.104441665,0.0013227747,0.00029394485,0.00004417902,0.000095716256,0.06874219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610955,0.0020217975,0.000083475425,0.00029211462,0.00094400404,0.0005490061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930829,0.0049660294,0.0002478769,0.00019258847,0.00095634663,0.00055427646],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006412948,0.00032171584,0.00056485937,0.002051581,0.008371914,0.0061235647,0.001449662,0.006266219,0.004584552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010539962,0.00023393767,0.00063707377,0.0023150656,0.022894513,0.0066679963,0.0035383399,0.0060854335,0.00033375635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048353,0.0000054483753,0.000111204055,0.000017744895,0.000003604898,0.00004712072,0.0022632566,0.0001562946,0.000025438638,0.9851158,0.010089206,0.0021601191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011722122,0.000020915462,0.0012414424,0.00022884698,0.000009388426,0.00009784449,0.004879734,0.0007040726,0.00019657248,0.7419089,0.25067917,0.000021451071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021656515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039281517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9916281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0114100585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008314339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08278614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388750154","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110349","title":"Visitors to national parks show positive attitudes towards recolonising wolves in the Bohemian Forest Ecosystem","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Interreg; Universität für Bodenkultur Wien","keywords":"Recreation; Visitor pattern; Geography; Wildlife; National park; Canis; Czech; Natura 2000; Residence; Sociocultural evolution; Environmental protection; Socioeconomics; Ecology; Biodiversity; Political science; Archaeology; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.04633979267300937,"score_gpt":0.2841292290071855,"score_spread":0.23778943633417615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388750154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99959654,0.000016237998,0.000008975235,0.00001674757,0.000001917195,9.058313e-7,0.000008012385,6.1910805e-7,0.00035002053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996351,0.000022105072,0.00001723932,0.000023798882,0.0000013618961,0.0000031920022,0.000021428628,5.808147e-7,0.000275283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998516,0.00004482893,0.0000062098966,0.000022199443,0.000027612665,0.00004755832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993568,0.00014553955,0.00020348957,0.000039412036,0.00008005068,0.00017474541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003865263,0.00013489716,0.00015499021,0.00039150324,0.00075931085,0.0005073954,0.00018966694,0.00030767414,0.0030680585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008999141,0.00015602102,0.00016931113,0.00024134116,0.0006651547,0.0004091062,0.00053729507,0.00039117603,0.00012861125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001850128,0.00009766547,0.9880741,0.00002227021,0.000044938693,0.00008766298,0.006454152,0.00006896329,0.0014986322,0.00006642496,0.00024216184,0.0031580573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018259709,0.000017724446,0.99565434,0.0000043642353,0.000006569601,0.000017888278,0.0040880176,0.000030382247,0.000056097277,0.000015387284,0.000105427236,0.000002097723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025253784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0711322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025253784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003229044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002526122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050213575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390122587","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110425","title":"Widespread degradation and limited protection of forests in global tropical dry ecosystems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf forests; Threatened species; Biodiversity; Shrubland; Tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests; Ecosystem; Biome; Agroforestry; Geography; Ecoregion; Ecosystem services; Forest ecology; Tropics; Subtropics; Forest restoration; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.04897544917466697,"score_gpt":0.22986846681653633,"score_spread":0.18089301764186935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390122587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970041,0.0009919016,0.00011128833,0.00035213435,0.0000069503353,0.0000043017917,0.0001500184,0.0000044312187,0.0013748946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994796,0.00028232412,0.00003669726,0.00005537037,0.000008476329,0.0000013199206,0.000042511547,8.716342e-7,0.00009276295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999571,0.00007019819,0.000035644396,0.00009839359,0.00008514339,0.00013959272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804974,0.00021933891,0.0011294956,0.00014965246,0.00016020938,0.00029156782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000813836,0.00012508749,0.00019893887,0.00091506913,0.00069574546,0.0011728732,0.00029375346,0.0003363177,0.0018929429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017683989,0.00013717977,0.00013602844,0.00097633834,0.0025642226,0.00066854176,0.0017370741,0.0004764834,0.000092461334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034648643,0.000039098824,0.95890266,0.0003973769,0.00013738421,0.0003808624,0.0021323175,0.0005180926,0.009770168,0.0018023937,0.00053171837,0.02504133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003562612,0.000017015214,0.9967616,0.000028253613,0.000015157838,0.00019025277,0.001526768,0.00004980996,0.00015238578,0.00043993857,0.00081235805,0.00000289609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012283742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04907614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012283742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007707767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084427785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024424493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391830674","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110489","title":"Temporal dynamics in gray wolf space use suggest stabilizing range in the Great Lakes region, USA","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Michigan State University","keywords":"Ecology; Gray wolf; Habitat; Disturbance (geology); Canis; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Population; Species distribution; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.051644497061506846,"score_gpt":0.25152650126415094,"score_spread":0.1998820042026441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391830674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993567,0.000028559909,0.00003486286,0.000118043725,0.0000017302293,0.0000010457655,0.00009210525,0.000003335152,0.00036363167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99964976,0.000019997968,0.000029955043,0.000019518719,0.000003124812,0.0000021039846,0.00010187953,0.0000014704522,0.00017216252],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992025,0.000017202845,0.000005587418,0.000023302275,0.000012440806,0.000021295984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996014,0.00008023952,0.00012988994,0.000026415157,0.00008555719,0.0000764447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001901749,0.00007830741,0.00010517533,0.0005823969,0.0003626039,0.0005364037,0.00028233728,0.0002866687,0.0011494653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093238906,0.00012261132,0.00011843588,0.00045863126,0.00041687783,0.00038490785,0.00041162295,0.00021462135,0.00009328112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008332592,0.000029083112,0.9944847,0.0000064409874,0.000043783093,0.00007372655,0.0006668282,0.00033091774,0.001069729,0.00014982281,0.0006010914,0.0024606243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012763218,0.000007792766,0.9989089,0.0000018870081,0.0000063136877,0.000014579798,0.00042140175,0.00040471778,0.000034515666,0.000028866625,0.0001685079,0.0000011696904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.080753885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22566566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080753885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048664302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046041474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1605677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393975461","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110566","title":"Overcome imposter syndrome: Contribute to working groups and build strong networks","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Hakai Institute; Tula Foundation; Mitacs; Pew Charitable Trusts; Smithsonian Institution","keywords":"Constructive; Diversity (politics); Process (computing); Feeling; Psychology; Knowledge management; Creativity; Natural (archaeology); Sustainability; Group cohesiveness; Personality; Facilitation; Public relations; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.047105631057626184,"score_gpt":0.31065656978703776,"score_spread":0.2635509387294116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393975461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46553484,0.0018905139,0.24280328,0.091816746,0.0031680416,0.0016813345,0.0001563479,0.0027301605,0.1902188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8865687,0.0005491506,0.07309457,0.007850237,0.00031675506,0.0012068738,0.00014411,0.00046610003,0.029803481],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96417445,0.02263894,0.0011851004,0.0027005204,0.005972643,0.0033282416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9347253,0.021168208,0.009597897,0.011033597,0.006968432,0.0165066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027327307,0.0015789917,0.0006908321,0.0031390467,0.0142404605,0.010286709,0.004614721,0.004631947,0.014731833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07604073,0.00095698936,0.0011168678,0.0010240527,0.015323519,0.015528084,0.03192472,0.006937134,0.004947615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002023399,0.00077417534,0.043249577,0.001119451,0.00019323002,0.008176258,0.4739544,0.00058294734,0.009103061,0.13165459,0.053359047,0.27763093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118032855,0.0006218646,0.013512975,0.0017653765,0.00016020153,0.0142669715,0.35844687,0.0037514055,0.0037425545,0.19396171,0.409394,0.00025810042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015876059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021866977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027327307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002647909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00721646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14452237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396841174","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110611","title":"Restoring ecological function: Interactions between vertebrates and latrines in a reintroduced population of Rhinoceros unicornis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rhinoceros; Ecology; Population; Biology; Geography; Zoology","score_opus":0.03798993717560418,"score_gpt":0.2614035809418673,"score_spread":0.2234136437662631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396841174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99988043,0.000013264635,0.000009364915,0.0000054511775,3.6873664e-7,0.0000012895518,0.000012022242,4.6069752e-7,0.00007740754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99965274,0.000020835889,0.00007735893,0.000015180566,7.5643106e-7,0.000005957445,0.000051508763,5.41056e-7,0.00017517163],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978226,0.00006221823,0.000014119188,0.00005607713,0.000024931154,0.000060489096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995808,0.00004863457,0.00020874615,0.00003078237,0.000039678107,0.00009138196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033036747,0.00022307177,0.00018344352,0.00036220727,0.0004264881,0.000435463,0.00041728833,0.00034595633,0.00088973576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005871464,0.00012773859,0.0002089558,0.00020456541,0.0004683669,0.00036122245,0.0004693493,0.00032624163,0.00015262667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007102123,0.0001739127,0.98978394,0.00001646884,0.00003479292,0.00056664465,0.0010934932,0.00006278933,0.0052856826,0.00002416454,0.000039717524,0.0028472801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010474923,0.000099152836,0.99806136,0.0000050732197,0.000011357714,0.00026139815,0.001188579,0.00013235018,0.00015264969,0.000007181641,0.00007730733,0.0000024819537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009559824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047426376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009559824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003451527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023563406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019008338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399113897","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110644","title":"Faunal representation: Exploring the intersection of conservation, national identity, and iconography in Uruguay","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Animal and Plant Science Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Iconography; Representation (politics); Identity (music); Intersection (aeronautics); Geography; Nature Conservation; Archaeology; Environmental ethics; History; Ecology; Political science; Art; Cartography; Aesthetics; Biology; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.3106691448924205,"score_gpt":0.4008601546566866,"score_spread":0.09019100976426614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399113897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960776,0.00009199234,0.000067640336,0.000119885925,0.000003380053,0.0000029730202,0.000015525691,9.135543e-7,0.0036202208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994142,0.000038076676,0.00005359394,0.000010167458,0.0000014375197,0.0000024935064,0.0000139205595,0.0000013068085,0.00046477668],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996039,0.00016636032,0.000015516243,0.00004392436,0.00003521208,0.000135148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945027,0.00014582074,0.000128666,0.00002527497,0.00013418349,0.000115767085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007310389,0.00014704974,0.00028132694,0.0012143493,0.0034187976,0.0018998429,0.00045365206,0.00031008176,0.0033515606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016959397,0.0001506481,0.000110620254,0.0018817757,0.0019073052,0.0012327278,0.0020576662,0.00047647732,0.00008890577],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015263782,0.00007985147,0.29921788,0.00009003484,0.000029416533,0.0004053934,0.6663194,0.0001352242,0.0017485742,0.0068709888,0.00059655687,0.024353974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033110787,0.00005399449,0.42204568,0.000072512434,0.00001993189,0.00012580436,0.5705795,0.0007093824,0.00022703756,0.0005693274,0.0055831634,0.000010366772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2191899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4257364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2191899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024783267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011593021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4358281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399459147","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110672","title":"Differential impact of clearcut and insect outbreak on boreal lichens and bryophytes 50 years after disturbance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Lichen and fungal ecology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université Laval; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts","funders":"","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Lichen; Boreal; Ecology; Taiga; Biology; Geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.02808141509373242,"score_gpt":0.24249312310704135,"score_spread":0.21441170801330894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399459147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997842,0.00004768213,0.000005756531,0.0000033388926,9.408695e-7,9.1442394e-7,0.00005884572,8.166834e-7,0.00009750252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99963605,0.000029789515,0.000012379403,0.0000068496806,0.0000020317543,0.0000013212544,0.00020041654,5.081376e-7,0.000110596535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997682,0.000020075686,0.000015143219,0.00005675905,0.00003409073,0.00010579138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989774,0.00007032337,0.0003557823,0.000037136844,0.000111629895,0.0004477671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027376995,0.0002088839,0.000212753,0.000670857,0.0004222172,0.0006524638,0.00022486551,0.00028335635,0.00096762646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006115676,0.000114222115,0.0002572523,0.00027043457,0.000351777,0.00034898418,0.00048479988,0.00027970356,0.00015491988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022202179,0.00006429418,0.9909725,0.000009249505,0.00004478746,0.00020789437,0.00029413583,0.000045200075,0.0060003167,0.000014401404,0.000046126348,0.002079161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.9357565e-7,0.000015526324,0.9998299,7.353204e-7,0.000002149713,0.000020226556,0.000075286924,0.000010286534,0.0000292964,0.0000011592266,0.000014494307,6.05083e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02046004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07273099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02046004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006293356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002843303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0406819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399474264","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110671","title":"A framework for ecological restoration cost accounting across context and scale","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Context (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geography; Accounting; Environmental science; Business; Biology; Cartography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.060102370373236874,"score_gpt":0.312032789780899,"score_spread":0.25193041940766214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399474264","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012892102,0.0023333218,0.9272021,0.008204849,0.00028928553,0.0015029025,0.0018747541,0.00041147927,0.045289226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3050357,0.002546244,0.6822459,0.00067948,0.0002460695,0.0030110795,0.0011007035,0.00022343539,0.004911345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.968985,0.018827055,0.0021614677,0.002622128,0.005728349,0.0016759306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96082735,0.023273878,0.0053302725,0.0032773267,0.006410813,0.00088035606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032878406,0.0035951308,0.0019408689,0.012406403,0.0025850516,0.012109081,0.006807541,0.0036089919,0.0076032314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07281943,0.0016005253,0.0044145854,0.012049935,0.0062030437,0.014245007,0.006666083,0.0060156216,0.00073872774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027165053,0.00009960852,0.0040656985,0.0003414302,0.0001663625,0.00012484276,0.0007206709,0.13445713,0.00012662746,0.8147587,0.0043692705,0.040742543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003117963,0.00010086181,0.0063254773,0.00090119394,0.00017651681,0.00024887983,0.0016003771,0.21057779,0.0002873631,0.73404306,0.045531627,0.0001756917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06505487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04935928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06505487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021044718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016468236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17387974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399697506","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110677","title":"Grey wolves (Canis lupus) shift selection of anthropogenic landscape features following predator control in the Nearctic boreal forest","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Taiga; Canis; Nearctic ecozone; Ecology; Predator; Selection (genetic algorithm); Geography; Boreal; Systemic lupus erythematosus; Predation; Biology","score_opus":0.015041777478319543,"score_gpt":0.24422170137334234,"score_spread":0.22917992389502279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399697506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999881,0.000009084214,0.000027017064,0.0000045749966,4.95289e-7,8.4568984e-7,0.000009967052,0.0000011170475,0.000065899585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99981326,0.0000063057746,0.00004979692,0.000008324607,8.8190194e-7,0.0000013958369,0.000030748557,4.8925864e-7,0.00008884765],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986994,0.000032441952,0.0000062987874,0.000042240277,0.000019490612,0.000029470108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952364,0.000079154815,0.00021266322,0.000038249218,0.000047181915,0.00009904804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030345994,0.00011574262,0.00012833084,0.00025682786,0.00019675288,0.00037755637,0.00014658971,0.00018418736,0.00041726604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079821516,0.00010164699,0.00016206266,0.00011857249,0.00028329287,0.00018980732,0.00015882177,0.00018962464,0.00005589569],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019497376,0.0002108521,0.98041326,0.0000110541305,0.0000495631,0.000108648164,0.00034605552,0.00037669748,0.012801047,0.00005742987,0.00010606799,0.005324256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.169439e-7,0.00005102491,0.9994435,6.3891446e-7,0.00000339575,0.00002195454,0.00008112927,0.00024587556,0.000108213986,0.000012932172,0.0000293568,0.0000011577491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0116459895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052977435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0116459895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003491344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016433942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023156404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400601699","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110708","title":"‘Participatory’ conservation research involving indigenous peoples and local communities: Fourteen principles for good practice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Citizen journalism; Participatory action research; Geography; Environmental planning; Community-based participatory research; Sociology; Environmental resource management; Environmental ethics; Political science; Ecology; Anthropology; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.5766659572305971,"score_gpt":0.3858297535644195,"score_spread":0.1908362036661776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400601699","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02676397,0.01623832,0.39093933,0.3877767,0.003102785,0.0091098165,0.00014653338,0.0004393135,0.16548328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42986214,0.0049011344,0.5066926,0.032005627,0.00087207503,0.013659191,0.00009379168,0.00023092784,0.011682517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5968992,0.33022565,0.017688775,0.013895192,0.03273175,0.008559399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6012345,0.31584445,0.011297097,0.037918102,0.023642262,0.010063607],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3490001,0.0017352824,0.0045067514,0.0039938865,0.030381186,0.029297745,0.00906261,0.024008382,0.003691795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18939225,0.0039411685,0.0025916535,0.0042716,0.21716753,0.019481944,0.020866428,0.024861233,0.0012513866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007835846,0.00039666364,0.0015985287,0.0024153274,0.00010234998,0.0003728361,0.19776466,0.000689516,0.00071906834,0.7311668,0.012668325,0.052027494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002693194,0.00018708606,0.0022661013,0.006088741,0.00010400284,0.00051495817,0.07647527,0.00052541937,0.0009909058,0.78351694,0.12892166,0.00013972547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077319406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015113016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6509999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0117455805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10522978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8027988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401604783","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110754","title":"Predicting the effects of land cover change on biodiversity in Prairie Canada using species distribution models","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Land cover; Geography; Distribution (mathematics); Cover (algebra); Ecology; Physical geography; Land use; Environmental science; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09578057621441878,"score_gpt":0.24067649001421393,"score_spread":0.14489591379979516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401604783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960905,0.0000998906,0.0016406926,0.00014940329,0.0000042067463,0.000019084522,0.0010352975,0.00008034063,0.0008805573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959842,0.00009893554,0.0022738534,0.000035819157,0.000002345052,0.0000147740375,0.0009010902,0.000010868922,0.00067809405],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998118,0.00002883002,0.0000075378493,0.000061528146,0.000029471317,0.000060863018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992461,0.00031299138,0.00008403812,0.00003287987,0.00019387742,0.00013008558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056528643,0.00050788507,0.0002925871,0.0007992473,0.0009899221,0.0010032925,0.0011392762,0.0005510802,0.0012803705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016026306,0.00048163734,0.000645493,0.00084380334,0.00055988785,0.0005478661,0.00046037327,0.00051905296,0.00017417343],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008787958,0.00006585242,0.24392997,0.00002845082,0.00011405296,0.0000795045,0.00008993905,0.7462115,0.0006788966,0.000634227,0.00086586265,0.0072137234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025036888,0.000021260752,0.060699623,0.000009194066,0.00002638666,0.000018449005,0.000110824374,0.9379765,0.00017117849,0.00041526437,0.00050945574,0.000016880715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96978575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96708494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03021425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012819392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008398002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09301168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401687964","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110757","title":"Nature's value and biodiversity ethics in a changing world: Insights from a special issue and questions for the future","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Environmental ethics; Value (mathematics); Geography; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biology; Philosophy; Environmental science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03754501640079848,"score_gpt":0.2726880062546204,"score_spread":0.23514298985382193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401687964","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011682447,0.031983208,0.0010555631,0.8705391,0.015214566,0.000011634061,0.000035732843,0.000014018506,0.06946372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5950256,0.073234074,0.003187443,0.20761028,0.061164647,0.00012707843,0.00011949371,0.00017756844,0.059353806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964785,0.0021104482,0.000097713935,0.00021035499,0.000645491,0.00045744109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97411186,0.020091122,0.0007182115,0.0005983988,0.002097159,0.0023832496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010162633,0.00034052282,0.0007934931,0.0012953429,0.009401508,0.020027447,0.0012882052,0.010120872,0.0058835307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014874146,0.00027792365,0.00054912345,0.0020131068,0.019502861,0.014959292,0.0042308904,0.011511296,0.0005247306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026687056,0.00012994943,0.0017149335,0.0002269541,0.000014184977,0.0003478964,0.021484327,0.0001872475,0.00018061887,0.62405163,0.31401697,0.037618645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009767948,0.00002161304,0.003638049,0.00052763126,0.000012102157,0.00031468284,0.024129,0.0003293341,0.00007295869,0.36298168,0.6079336,0.000029602777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034957891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008761475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020027447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005954371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008048203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053745806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401863001","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110756","title":"Limited cougar recolonization of eastern North America predicted by an individual-based model","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.037528373587979016,"score_gpt":0.23658786117567362,"score_spread":0.1990594875876946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401863001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98584855,0.00014322453,0.006749958,0.000384754,0.000020892663,0.0000188984,0.0009281392,0.00012263149,0.005782905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957289,0.00006922549,0.0014428534,0.00007413457,0.000007888186,0.000028866834,0.00042739548,0.000017489945,0.0022033693],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986756,0.000025446101,0.000004398812,0.000050976843,0.000007726843,0.000043851724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996105,0.00015221261,0.00007525749,0.000017050652,0.00006555942,0.00007948123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003575297,0.00051049655,0.00047396886,0.00045658284,0.0005998076,0.0009994588,0.0014635175,0.0010934612,0.0029474641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008677321,0.00041890907,0.0005811487,0.00046029448,0.00061773823,0.0006757794,0.000497268,0.00066559826,0.00023653352],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027070597,0.00002230769,0.010658666,0.0000071251466,0.000019152463,0.00003853133,0.000035886733,0.9872935,0.00015440279,0.0004993106,0.00035459574,0.00088963023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009986935,0.000010548688,0.0026724949,0.000004037026,0.000010948333,0.000009126108,0.00003588742,0.9966876,0.00002610056,0.0003281075,0.00019910483,0.0000060228035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25211608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17863727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25211608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020601812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015576725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50129724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401873118","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110717","title":"A framework for optimising opportunistic collaborative syntheses to propel ecological conservation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"ConocoPhillips; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; Fondation Bertarelli; Smithsonian Institution","keywords":"Nature Conservation; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geography; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.11755047920087384,"score_gpt":0.3267026012296364,"score_spread":0.20915212202876254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401873118","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003961428,0.0038737864,0.8620459,0.063942716,0.0013740059,0.0088303,0.0004267812,0.0011533555,0.054391712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032787323,0.00082978705,0.955,0.001595535,0.00019420279,0.006712253,0.00024243238,0.00022495714,0.0024135853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5241855,0.4157638,0.023342097,0.013419593,0.01796644,0.005322604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5495574,0.31525674,0.01830589,0.05594694,0.0444191,0.016513962],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.44522002,0.0040443726,0.002331474,0.0154381,0.01590278,0.04222785,0.014666962,0.0152845,0.011221952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31912538,0.002460068,0.004023401,0.0099199945,0.06188895,0.028062137,0.030350862,0.011479522,0.00530773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007009097,0.00018053381,0.000860314,0.0028032954,0.000114257185,0.00060888805,0.07002181,0.0055336123,0.0009770731,0.83572197,0.011537879,0.071570314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011261312,0.0000724949,0.00033709386,0.004573334,0.00006975212,0.00024676006,0.021503817,0.0042137117,0.0007054536,0.76149195,0.20656353,0.00010958759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072086724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010243737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44522002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030265668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09590073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6841425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401878050","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110763","title":"Integrating high-resolution remote sensing and empirical wildlife detection data for climate-resilient corridors across tropical elevational gradients","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Bobolink Foundation; BAND foundation; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation","keywords":"Wildlife; Remote sensing; Geography; Environmental science; Tropical forest; Tropics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.07407801459690552,"score_gpt":0.3283241812439786,"score_spread":0.2542461666470731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401878050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98844224,0.00029788818,0.0075970325,0.00028413496,0.000031985095,0.000023182844,0.001820947,0.00021423816,0.0012883444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98985845,0.00008501562,0.008276123,0.000044973112,0.000015253427,0.000010600975,0.0014923803,0.000019369867,0.0001977753],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955577,0.0001373642,0.0000300428,0.00012742929,0.00006378064,0.00008568066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987437,0.00044702477,0.00020588774,0.00023692021,0.0002759395,0.00009059385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001266594,0.00033091343,0.00027768261,0.0012730403,0.00031526675,0.0010853864,0.0005346065,0.0004648846,0.0010863588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028100195,0.00025346671,0.00038202558,0.0014555397,0.00024248147,0.0012537069,0.00074291235,0.0003698314,0.00027205163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023880134,0.0005936067,0.75325435,0.00018480276,0.00051377714,0.00015235363,0.00032812083,0.10088082,0.013676939,0.0006036654,0.00252733,0.12704544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004896294,0.000083162326,0.6529791,0.000058164667,0.0002236662,0.00009495896,0.0008519579,0.33912772,0.0025998193,0.0011797368,0.0026897367,0.00006313396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03631146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10156196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03631146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046653085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075502094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07220018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402119273","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110771","title":"Coral reef recovery in a remote and large marine protected area is resilient to cascading trophic interactions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fondation Bertarelli; California State University; Women Divers Hall of Fame","keywords":"Marine protected area; Coral reef; Trophic level; Coral bleaching; Coral reef protection; Marine reserve; Fishery; Reef; Oceanography; Environmental issues with coral reefs; Resilience of coral reefs; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Geology; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Habitat","score_opus":0.03921865800363596,"score_gpt":0.26193619541259205,"score_spread":0.22271753740895608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402119273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.978017,0.0179242,0.0015286957,0.00073473743,0.000048078717,0.000031480136,0.00044578215,0.000077195626,0.0011929213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99714404,0.0019589153,0.00049161835,0.00012187238,0.000015919117,0.000011989079,0.00018083963,0.000007284995,0.00006748969],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989478,0.0003662057,0.000094543735,0.00040018445,0.00008204167,0.00010926019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981186,0.00070622016,0.0005441245,0.00028152,0.00010124663,0.00024831592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024414617,0.0005377418,0.0009293305,0.0014446107,0.0005472116,0.0010190028,0.00063437235,0.00049853895,0.0012045858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028344954,0.00026068083,0.0030800032,0.0011571683,0.0009085005,0.0007233422,0.0012589883,0.0007777761,0.00007347655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008367581,0.0001624204,0.8802655,0.00434414,0.05008338,0.0005777104,0.0006302535,0.0067378324,0.009464827,0.001177216,0.0007650205,0.044954967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039230763,0.00034413591,0.98210824,0.00028236373,0.010855851,0.00011075696,0.0006454611,0.0029678966,0.00045050564,0.0009450901,0.0012183448,0.00003207389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014473009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019990394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014473009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058447133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006177907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02877754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402159445","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110770","title":"Improving restoration outcomes of boreal Sphagnum-dominated peatlands after peat-extraction: The key role of phosphorus fertilization","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Sphagnum Peat Moss Association","keywords":"Peat; Sphagnum; Boreal; Phosphorus; Environmental science; Human fertilization; Key (lock); Ecology; Biology; Agronomy; Chemistry","score_opus":0.01495943692749937,"score_gpt":0.24402863562125673,"score_spread":0.22906919869375736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402159445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99945563,0.00012363373,0.000104214545,0.00000651687,0.0000015443255,0.000007701838,0.000029799394,0.0000058768146,0.0002651337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999321,0.000093994764,0.00027310025,0.000005293883,9.0679066e-7,0.000003445512,0.000055866713,0.0000015650389,0.00024474945],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.999845,0.000020021933,0.000010442963,0.000025312653,0.000040563387,0.000058545567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996973,0.000029225657,0.00008886963,0.000013284687,0.000085608255,0.00008572026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000421279,0.0002930276,0.0002865474,0.00035745525,0.00044513505,0.00052398565,0.00028154138,0.00019269326,0.00038161446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006386568,0.000059474005,0.00016328259,0.000210796,0.00027930812,0.00027196266,0.00034614536,0.00015153456,0.00007120602],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015897796,0.0005132506,0.4505109,0.0005411167,0.00016780783,0.0013898516,0.0020562508,0.0037182546,0.41967416,0.00017002813,0.00026318783,0.11940549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044115736,0.0003411846,0.98868984,0.000014471272,0.000029365749,0.00011833991,0.0007402426,0.00050750235,0.008778251,0.000040432005,0.0007270849,0.000008904879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050527472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21542703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050527472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009240281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012370122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10046679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403927127","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110828","title":"Conserving genetic diversity hotspots under climate change: Are protected areas helpful?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca; European Commission","keywords":"Climate change; Geography; Genetic diversity; Diversity (politics); Ecology; Biology; Population; Political science","score_opus":0.12543228910919407,"score_gpt":0.26894884809251735,"score_spread":0.14351655898332327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403927127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8780814,0.041122306,0.009331112,0.040690135,0.0005074907,0.00012720579,0.00093367597,0.00017569438,0.02903096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902699,0.0045485357,0.0034139797,0.00097462645,0.00019233585,0.000032682798,0.00019984358,0.000013833581,0.00035430418],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843365,0.0008892039,0.000048522408,0.00018121049,0.00018383013,0.00026359232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950826,0.0015366143,0.0015163546,0.0006031731,0.00037543097,0.0008857565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037905122,0.00042927312,0.0004908976,0.0009289392,0.00081280293,0.0019879548,0.0011087619,0.0009779363,0.0042407233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061299843,0.00013263761,0.00038917418,0.0011419272,0.0029037045,0.0032527186,0.0018466112,0.0007134455,0.00037089485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044545028,0.00017180716,0.4291824,0.0023492598,0.0005158033,0.000908288,0.003983634,0.005766664,0.0048736995,0.01031865,0.008486036,0.5329983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045057324,0.00038433226,0.9107615,0.0018031244,0.00030995326,0.00081255706,0.0072659226,0.004674175,0.0008745431,0.01611167,0.05687657,0.00008061591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043926826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012605047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043926826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095599325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017202647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020046413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403929952","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110836","title":"Reply to Thornton and Murray: Models for Canada lynx conservation planning require nuance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental ethics; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05506701205311367,"score_gpt":0.26772634783174576,"score_spread":0.21265933577863208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403929952","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018535485,0.0017905729,0.00022201617,0.983718,0.01351984,0.0000041167227,0.000061171944,0.000018445984,0.00048057016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0068329256,0.002279842,0.0006771409,0.96904993,0.016944425,0.000033003413,0.000049429735,0.00005694479,0.0040763495],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970216,0.0009259878,0.00032490757,0.0005381993,0.0008809241,0.00030826413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9551149,0.025825545,0.0017246067,0.001262162,0.01303877,0.003034056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009481659,0.0010158782,0.0014485106,0.0011487823,0.005163685,0.0044894563,0.0037176602,0.030153576,0.007935043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06327273,0.0010386681,0.0011701927,0.0021238988,0.0070369565,0.0075537907,0.003335637,0.048370034,0.0040041977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026186362,0.0000050529648,0.00015923759,0.00003651238,0.000016128488,0.00005568987,0.00020347732,0.00019862564,0.00003122745,0.0026272812,0.9936964,0.0029442175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008160237,0.000025358408,0.0014915005,0.00061421015,0.0000943052,0.00034607147,0.0025595068,0.001419154,0.00022407279,0.033748496,0.9592122,0.0001834366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15150286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14889437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84849715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007651075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01213943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.301242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403992017","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110838","title":"Connectivity conservation to mitigate climate and land-cover change impacts on Borneo","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia","funders":"Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Climate change; Land cover; Cover (algebra); Geography; Environmental resource management; Land use; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.05513088799399459,"score_gpt":0.28132066461057126,"score_spread":0.22618977661657666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403992017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74119514,0.004872086,0.1329934,0.014011457,0.0004544303,0.00039713833,0.0031006203,0.0008427575,0.102133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972451,0.0012111588,0.023120735,0.00036309546,0.00004070754,0.00014236839,0.00069966126,0.0000597022,0.0019115914],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978036,0.00007159383,0.00000658671,0.000023695055,0.00003213587,0.00008565555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949014,0.00013159012,0.00013026931,0.000038930513,0.00009980269,0.000109205095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006059088,0.00048573705,0.0002461472,0.0008708233,0.0008782018,0.0010939441,0.00094065524,0.0004073492,0.0045985165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022692636,0.00013882345,0.0003490825,0.00079385925,0.00050265214,0.0016997852,0.0015433208,0.00058659626,0.00020303206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014827024,0.00025239252,0.12485204,0.0007517948,0.00032190865,0.0012166156,0.0015402873,0.3451153,0.0051961252,0.08336926,0.039411146,0.39782485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009395569,0.00040091528,0.1917848,0.0010357121,0.00044519448,0.00092686916,0.009544453,0.4898273,0.0026482928,0.119692,0.18343747,0.00016298544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027727881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08349259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027727881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014369518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021456727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055132985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404522514","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110879","title":"Risk avoidance during dispersal: Temporal and behavioral shifts in selection by non-resident eastern wolves (Canis c.f. lycaon)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Canis; Ecology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Biology; Zoology; Geography; Demography; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.01760797596539353,"score_gpt":0.25006294564427994,"score_spread":0.2324549696788864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404522514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998259,0.000022117474,0.000022634676,0.0000045848683,5.2005737e-7,0.0000023516181,0.000023222612,0.0000010001089,0.0000977057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999572,0.000024259845,0.00009201078,0.000010488172,0.0000013832766,0.000008318298,0.00009412818,8.0720446e-7,0.00019665071],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999026,0.000021111837,0.0000067856417,0.000030158306,0.000018242286,0.000021104288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995247,0.00006829152,0.00022751318,0.000028369652,0.000052369516,0.000098773744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023869346,0.00016419234,0.00013859899,0.00034603613,0.00020561318,0.00031349808,0.00015139447,0.00018711768,0.00056197774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063956465,0.00013281986,0.00010894178,0.00017927207,0.00020484744,0.00018729868,0.00024710866,0.0002713359,0.00009971138],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021098941,0.00019408265,0.97945875,0.000013051378,0.000042776966,0.00006958223,0.0008081,0.000076878,0.012423956,0.000018365417,0.00011076588,0.006572633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.361039e-7,0.00004666613,0.9996476,7.244415e-7,0.0000019070263,0.00002735022,0.00009567984,0.00006454664,0.0000779414,0.0000029701223,0.000032978016,9.919834e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077314074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035681177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077314074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018090472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012825096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015372813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404557633","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110877","title":"Historic range modeling – A necessary and robust step in Canada lynx recovery planning","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Range (aeronautics); Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0468024891710121,"score_gpt":0.2172406414057048,"score_spread":0.1704381522346927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404557633","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19491078,0.002917356,0.6655021,0.025007537,0.0006290666,0.0007549951,0.009772315,0.0052286265,0.09527727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6971284,0.0012183308,0.28682637,0.00091169134,0.00010540246,0.00018739965,0.0041175312,0.000986282,0.008518556],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989567,0.00034880644,0.00005940081,0.0001513626,0.0003234317,0.00016021922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698573,0.00089825236,0.00022805408,0.0004765401,0.0012017348,0.00020971833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003512613,0.000457821,0.00057089305,0.0012441593,0.0015390854,0.0036858108,0.0024152235,0.0007489556,0.006850571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012422673,0.000520299,0.00044184306,0.0015858405,0.0007665634,0.0025203188,0.001297311,0.0014059419,0.0007817783],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008508001,0.00012474065,0.0419967,0.00017496885,0.00022187582,0.00018712293,0.00069774484,0.6576883,0.0013250642,0.030589448,0.040756986,0.22615188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044670447,0.000043996602,0.016144065,0.0003980006,0.000111391106,0.00009632497,0.0022598957,0.8450101,0.0011711948,0.04726379,0.08736508,0.00009157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.741696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88793814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.258304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006499354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021949003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51965034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404655522","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110867","title":"Spatial distribution of tree-related microhabitats in European beech-dominated forests","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Beech; Geography; Spatial distribution; Distribution (mathematics); Tree (set theory); Ecology; Forestry; Biology; Remote sensing; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027244137885296792,"score_gpt":0.21522904189902042,"score_spread":0.18798490401372364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404655522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997147,0.000053883767,0.000026584548,0.0000030812819,3.3678623e-7,5.5488755e-7,0.00007273029,0.0000012178754,0.00012696975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99978775,0.00001859626,0.000033793083,0.0000019989373,5.3852204e-7,0.000001149931,0.00006663273,5.2681673e-7,0.00008893855],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984,0.00003321476,0.000013426929,0.000053396237,0.000016868533,0.000042890802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993599,0.00024071653,0.00017290012,0.000038450966,0.00008901485,0.00009910002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022149071,0.00009265321,0.00015188103,0.0009965337,0.00018379265,0.0003933601,0.00019601756,0.0002143479,0.0012709245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006622899,0.0000941204,0.00014215181,0.00056245894,0.00027923088,0.00022244414,0.00037150795,0.00007217549,0.00015189667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023608391,0.000026667281,0.9892049,0.000017829703,0.000077595156,0.00009949267,0.00041702474,0.00045288316,0.0053431247,0.000108263805,0.00010256832,0.0039135166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.031005e-7,0.0000057778893,0.99968433,0.0000013349379,0.000003449698,0.000026813275,0.00008887687,0.000119828546,0.000033521294,0.000009959466,0.000024172523,9.493267e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012113696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035777263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012113696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021092629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011031435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024086356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404733155","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110847","title":"Managing multiple threats: Evaluating the efficacy of broad-scale introduced predator management in improving native mammal resilience to fire","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Predator; Resilience (materials science); Mammal; Marine mammal; Scale (ratio); Geography; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Predation; Cartography","score_opus":0.03735855866775432,"score_gpt":0.29724359736166583,"score_spread":0.2598850386939115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404733155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99951434,0.000032965097,0.00011021478,0.00002337667,0.0000057976645,0.000053125626,0.000010712729,0.0000029184143,0.00024653308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988079,0.000057287278,0.0006522411,0.00003922972,0.000016189497,0.0001363405,0.000027567801,0.0000011224007,0.0002621896],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924636,0.00032021254,0.00007268416,0.00013703792,0.00010917971,0.000114560746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969217,0.0013690062,0.00074548397,0.00017225572,0.0002084328,0.000583101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002600583,0.00074176735,0.00040652932,0.000338416,0.00036679613,0.0005192982,0.000765425,0.0010459232,0.001165762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004802044,0.0002054511,0.00063118926,0.0001438711,0.0005675926,0.0012059509,0.00048127453,0.00058777485,0.00013157832],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.1470492,0.19521098,0.22063448,0.001374215,0.0038222033,0.000578882,0.0010545197,0.08780047,0.0626976,0.0011562585,0.0007267132,0.27789444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060131177,0.60499096,0.3033243,0.00014810216,0.0020016164,0.00026829325,0.0007919348,0.058160797,0.021989452,0.00094101456,0.0012749496,0.000095484625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021856492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064518517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002600583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008668371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062955666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013753355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405539736","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110933","title":"Integrating movement behaviours for intra-specific conservation: The caribou case","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ministry of Forests; Government of British Columbia; University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; European Commission; University of Calgary","keywords":"Geography; Movement (music); Nature Conservation; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.05153221761740405,"score_gpt":0.26670118586525077,"score_spread":0.2151689682478467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405539736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97536194,0.0017227114,0.017121945,0.001796168,0.00003212637,0.000016463375,0.000098238925,0.000041023533,0.0038094185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99612254,0.0001883276,0.0032193272,0.0000857096,0.00001342839,0.0000056707213,0.00005156826,0.000016575652,0.0002969176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804556,0.0011220855,0.000053397474,0.00039502268,0.00014318184,0.00024080585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99509406,0.0026271304,0.00056848995,0.00078061986,0.0005230124,0.00040672277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032712128,0.00044542534,0.00061398017,0.00189804,0.0011140062,0.0024920332,0.00093721546,0.0011765037,0.0014204964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011980375,0.000256278,0.00095723185,0.0018990728,0.0028934635,0.001915044,0.002013354,0.0011267113,0.00017821946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012287902,0.00010000287,0.90812415,0.00006481409,0.0005019517,0.0010379354,0.007111946,0.008911868,0.0013084912,0.01663766,0.00057971047,0.055498537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017129032,0.00016245685,0.7928412,0.0002994863,0.0007005391,0.001588264,0.0130135715,0.13640441,0.00071547925,0.044823267,0.009305073,0.00012917144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15527925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24424358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15527925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013752183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020119788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30875087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405580608","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110927","title":"Introduction to the special issue: Leveraging genetics in spatial conservation prioritization","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prioritization; Conservation genetics; Geography; Conservation biology; Evolutionary biology; Environmental resource management; Biology; Ecology; Genetics; Management science; Environmental science; Engineering","score_opus":0.026137674098909908,"score_gpt":0.2259266531471672,"score_spread":0.1997889790482573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405580608","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019477846,0.019915445,0.003691865,0.09669962,0.8743451,0.00005369772,0.00023386905,0.00019314236,0.004672437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012794548,0.016183956,0.0021960663,0.046574708,0.9202795,0.00008006513,0.00028263134,0.0002597829,0.012863779],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754626,0.000560383,0.00030837578,0.00057547184,0.00078283023,0.00022663793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974068,0.011652619,0.0015546711,0.0010549821,0.0075862836,0.0040833917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053737583,0.0022006533,0.0027950185,0.0028247559,0.002149608,0.008391385,0.0030388176,0.009149148,0.033116914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020653723,0.00088698306,0.0018542602,0.0019807818,0.0026722015,0.0055836625,0.0032950381,0.014062715,0.014689706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018277306,0.000021535374,0.00013097358,0.0001887956,0.000016330603,0.000049919625,0.000020118041,0.00009578332,0.0001563613,0.0010422545,0.9800307,0.018228928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019244922,0.000050627754,0.0006847332,0.00046197328,0.00003509619,0.00034026534,0.00007500937,0.00038849644,0.00015552994,0.0051020356,0.99265116,0.00003582227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021217836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004714181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033116914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001841233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029784886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11078709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405635233","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110939","title":"Measuring forest degradation via ecological-integrity indicators at multiple spatial scales","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Degradation (telecommunications); Ecology; Environmental resource management; Geography; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.05348581230477186,"score_gpt":0.234192470382984,"score_spread":0.18070665807821212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405635233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97773963,0.00016777146,0.016126296,0.000057295212,0.00000772883,0.00004281868,0.0013292248,0.00011696542,0.004412293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929402,0.000060089114,0.0061272345,0.0000134891225,0.000005349982,0.0000235311,0.00053575204,0.0000063559396,0.00028796683],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890876,0.00026289665,0.00010600865,0.00019398912,0.00038212913,0.00014621856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965174,0.0007516675,0.0016120364,0.00027265577,0.0006602019,0.00018600374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012947768,0.00046459906,0.0004078051,0.0030651998,0.00041557974,0.0013497003,0.00035239814,0.0005365259,0.0010612912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030890547,0.00018621742,0.0004254155,0.0027780663,0.00049889076,0.0018139302,0.0011067005,0.00041185186,0.00023880547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014925675,0.00017837921,0.9500712,0.00005998083,0.0002547196,0.000047620917,0.00017899011,0.012277106,0.006851317,0.00063455873,0.00026053592,0.029036487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007042623,0.00015112331,0.9543117,0.000020994776,0.0001171028,0.00012639342,0.00040641427,0.03805182,0.0050360966,0.0009371338,0.0008117978,0.000022389522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008215713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025133317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008215713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063727685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004300253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016335785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405654860","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110945","title":"Corrigendum to “Spatial distribution of tree-related microhabitats in European beech-dominated forests” [Biol. Conserv. 301 (2025) 110867 10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110867]","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"Beech; Forestry; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.03432780008283131,"score_gpt":0.2208639492552846,"score_spread":0.18653614917245329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405654860","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015885534,0.0011226999,0.00063088967,0.0436994,0.9241982,0.00007762603,0.0060869493,0.000705345,0.023320125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036764892,0.0034356294,0.0018720498,0.04658025,0.1415164,0.00032006446,0.009859924,0.0010705205,0.7916688],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986792,0.00019068587,0.000228321,0.00023763035,0.0005360253,0.00012808139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98523015,0.0022293937,0.00053390936,0.0007143553,0.010486334,0.0008058693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017234752,0.0018031038,0.001655222,0.0027079633,0.002349441,0.002379123,0.0023619349,0.0037816241,0.2731595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015326174,0.0009018668,0.0014241786,0.0019656415,0.001056179,0.0018193029,0.001752285,0.0035413054,0.15567411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007501909,0.0000029147636,0.000032123753,0.000026534633,0.0000012469743,0.000019961239,0.0000025562667,0.0000130084145,0.000015145922,0.000075855736,0.9980089,0.001794361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003273914,0.00001938648,0.0025888323,0.00023254317,0.000011903319,0.0000960994,0.000046280635,0.00017686632,0.00015284609,0.0006174919,0.9959992,0.00002584959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052705154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0738279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2731595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024554876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027412248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9138096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406063140","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110956","title":"Projecting bird assemblage responses to climate-driven changes in managed boreal forest landscapes of Québec","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Université Laval; University of Alberta; Natural Resources Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Geography; Taiga; Boreal; Ecology; Assemblage (archaeology); Climate change; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.024843820766010584,"score_gpt":0.2655054547653041,"score_spread":0.24066163399929355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406063140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99438214,0.0001667013,0.00077544275,0.00014010172,0.000007095282,0.000025590965,0.003234847,0.00003915352,0.0012288637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968079,0.00009446572,0.0009024777,0.00003875246,0.0000022967201,0.000021962167,0.0016151073,0.000004640972,0.000512333],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989784,0.00002191207,0.000003844476,0.00003049021,0.000015058738,0.000030865926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961,0.000050082188,0.00005463329,0.000026727419,0.00018129099,0.00007741864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028463028,0.00023752429,0.00013967043,0.00042216785,0.00049271487,0.0007015089,0.00056705024,0.00029990327,0.0014711006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007713612,0.00011271835,0.00038207552,0.000623197,0.00023673613,0.0002859857,0.0003110292,0.0002609847,0.00012000664],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015751412,0.00008718306,0.91943985,0.000059510916,0.00022301926,0.00012035566,0.00034923747,0.06214471,0.0017938679,0.00035483492,0.0023644804,0.01290547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029083692,0.00003639312,0.9112128,0.000033606335,0.00005227626,0.00002546964,0.0005457001,0.0853303,0.00021391384,0.00008930651,0.0024083836,0.000022675993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9837568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01624322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010687993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045903935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07754719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406256171","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.110966","title":"Sea turtles in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, a step towards understanding bycatch and management of these species in tuna fisheries","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Huntsman Marine Science Centre; Crown Investments Corporation (Canada)","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; European Commission","keywords":"Bycatch; Tuna; Fishery; Fisheries management; Geography; Oceanography; Biology; Fishing; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Geology","score_opus":0.05738132491799137,"score_gpt":0.24388019046227255,"score_spread":0.1864988655442812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406256171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98529726,0.0033786695,0.000543137,0.004090244,0.000074938434,0.000012949972,0.00022686992,0.000016532838,0.006359339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995943,0.0017860648,0.00041195675,0.0005270723,0.00003241077,0.000005313308,0.00013986726,0.000004210318,0.0011501185],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984515,0.000053036936,0.000007593775,0.000023000533,0.000017876091,0.000053333755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942625,0.000056417888,0.00019077101,0.000030383604,0.00013535419,0.0001609058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055267196,0.00021510893,0.00019665572,0.000540535,0.00063852867,0.0010576572,0.00036304473,0.0003367391,0.0024020886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008446802,0.00009935129,0.00020537668,0.0005040046,0.00087116566,0.00077790587,0.00050568185,0.0005275402,0.0001709885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013517533,0.00005002385,0.9274055,0.00012041505,0.0000785399,0.00024074939,0.0019751324,0.0004117701,0.004443925,0.0010380966,0.0016428347,0.0624578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026110936,0.00005051791,0.9917584,0.0000571235,0.000025696923,0.00014035845,0.0042368877,0.00018320393,0.000126753,0.0003170468,0.003094535,0.0000067546525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15480193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3942885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15480193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081873056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016700313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30780178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406733111","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110934","title":"Increased bird abundances over 30 years in an extensive commercial forest landscape","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society","funders":"National Council for Air and Stream Improvement; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; Weyerhaeuser Company","keywords":"Geography; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Agroforestry; Forestry; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.024042085296487423,"score_gpt":0.2750704495905706,"score_spread":0.25102836429408315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406733111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99977595,0.000051685427,0.000019314575,0.000011643376,0.0000018013408,8.3068215e-7,0.000050738843,8.937487e-7,0.00008706479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996687,0.000030586776,0.000024893568,0.000009434224,0.000003294104,0.0000016715005,0.000100571764,5.134259e-7,0.0001602359],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985635,0.000029325294,0.000012138496,0.000045671746,0.000021240165,0.000035288485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994413,0.0000636239,0.00023376511,0.000032935604,0.00006970426,0.00015865441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027504197,0.00012925868,0.0001456827,0.000580688,0.00046439073,0.0004099591,0.00019274342,0.00039311644,0.000792222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064427237,0.00011287657,0.00018513393,0.000495565,0.0003664751,0.0004057942,0.000460092,0.0002763512,0.00012267692],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016554208,0.00008400448,0.99555284,0.0000091165175,0.00005944977,0.00017698358,0.00020058292,0.00006541034,0.0015563183,0.0000127941685,0.00007843546,0.0020385718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.479045e-7,0.000026033957,0.9996679,8.3535315e-7,0.000005273309,0.00006198288,0.00010879786,0.00003984599,0.000025183499,0.000003919348,0.000058484304,8.673642e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0171429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07846793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0171429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037749033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021495658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034086227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406793001","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.110985","title":"A case study from a critical stopover site in the East Asian-Australasian Flyway provides lessons for optimal high-tide roost management to support shorebird conservation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Muskoka Community Foundation; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Flyway; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.04605942507372283,"score_gpt":0.30405246914748746,"score_spread":0.2579930440737646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406793001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915452,0.0000691781,0.0016304802,0.00059456856,0.00002934755,0.00011929445,0.0001412041,0.00002874489,0.005842004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863412,0.00019403572,0.0044088536,0.00016582452,0.000018566976,0.00006013417,0.00015183399,0.000023055336,0.008636432],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996464,0.00010034553,0.000012448031,0.000042099822,0.00006792075,0.00013077144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924326,0.0001758241,0.00007913247,0.00005014026,0.00012112539,0.0003305208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046432385,0.00068250514,0.00027575536,0.0007187308,0.0067114597,0.0010959243,0.0012835475,0.0024883423,0.0038102963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010003757,0.0002458603,0.00044434416,0.00075333804,0.00095018756,0.0007703093,0.0009792565,0.0011605998,0.00043465642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005724042,0.0036049152,0.3432984,0.0007087662,0.00018459311,0.42635256,0.07539943,0.012948105,0.019566594,0.0056518493,0.017043037,0.094669364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015003416,0.003663396,0.30461118,0.0003686239,0.00020743332,0.09886629,0.49460784,0.01588302,0.008693005,0.003505689,0.06921549,0.00022793024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06215656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33243933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06215656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020738917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00191958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123589516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407056252","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111007","title":"Five recommendations to fill the blank space in indicators at local and short-term scales","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Blank; Term (time); Space (punctuation); Environmental science; Geography; Computer science; Physics; Materials science","score_opus":0.023981627383922254,"score_gpt":0.2987795719517804,"score_spread":0.27479794456785817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407056252","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023059193,0.0110829,0.031227471,0.85371006,0.043596897,0.007848474,0.0065386863,0.003105689,0.0405839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016260857,0.012500097,0.4719515,0.40095916,0.0075660325,0.018719746,0.00935845,0.00092891994,0.061755292],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90994567,0.03875742,0.017739102,0.0043185637,0.023571258,0.005668006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.53915495,0.12953407,0.026146712,0.02463632,0.25228223,0.028245768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11458156,0.004313076,0.0032116722,0.010725774,0.00534168,0.012330042,0.014497978,0.03081784,0.03242386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28555343,0.0030229522,0.006456197,0.008433241,0.008837279,0.026217785,0.011143052,0.029691204,0.015310991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012278561,0.00046796002,0.00359984,0.0034693107,0.000079472404,0.00035261395,0.0014924507,0.0011749176,0.00075119245,0.014460735,0.8867159,0.08731277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020558161,0.00023801284,0.0066542258,0.014952259,0.00019547432,0.00041641973,0.0043587275,0.0014948852,0.0010184782,0.021501562,0.948466,0.00049839297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067963645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09891993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11458156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012480799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08673156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60597247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407241486","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.110989","title":"Triangulating habitat suitability for the locally extirpated California grizzly bear","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of California, Santa Barbara; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Geography; Habitat; Ecology; Biology; Ursus; Sociology; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.034061513258855786,"score_gpt":0.26067015944027266,"score_spread":0.22660864618141688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407241486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99787426,0.000027175298,0.00050330383,0.000019775465,0.0000056288686,0.0000054188495,0.00034517125,0.000024595762,0.0011946668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971589,0.000017646176,0.0017331954,0.00000522539,0.0000026019222,0.000006527087,0.0007529361,0.000007759878,0.00031509247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978095,0.000030912684,0.0000064760184,0.00009972543,0.000039541173,0.000042371346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996735,0.000086440865,0.0000500773,0.000046634326,0.000093599636,0.000049860995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043317187,0.00015868008,0.00028080549,0.0008782362,0.0006837327,0.0005314144,0.00047576995,0.00019921636,0.0015047444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010944079,0.0001459103,0.00023026993,0.00082073413,0.00019313581,0.0003443768,0.00053192093,0.0001788923,0.00032010995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034643288,0.00007606761,0.95142686,0.000032141546,0.00012028881,0.00016101703,0.000647764,0.009720012,0.003027991,0.00042762884,0.0025763684,0.031437457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004004187,0.00012077226,0.93319714,0.000023873885,0.00010425696,0.00014295276,0.0033238928,0.059436932,0.0009948444,0.0003185025,0.0022750963,0.000021728156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08636847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3048639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08636847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042392514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062039273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17173153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407241527","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111002","title":"Compassionate conservation in practice: A values-driven, interdisciplinary, pluralistic, and deliberative community","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation Techniques and Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Nature Conservation; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Sociology; Geography; Political science; Ecology; Biology; Philosophy; Environmental science","score_opus":0.10076300387652347,"score_gpt":0.3538668274045466,"score_spread":0.25310382352802313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407241527","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2119477,0.005863475,0.24338907,0.38640326,0.0026748753,0.0026622147,0.000047645397,0.0004101894,0.14660154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8863927,0.0015639307,0.08030847,0.024984345,0.0004242031,0.0011854316,0.00003134003,0.00014928126,0.0049602007],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8474672,0.12823975,0.002620249,0.0058656298,0.012123659,0.0036835799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90099937,0.06521385,0.0053739073,0.0073146326,0.005558497,0.015539791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07451229,0.0008769446,0.0009739451,0.0034346664,0.021770546,0.0282496,0.0038468644,0.009382639,0.0027679643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05320693,0.0010497201,0.0008224263,0.0022582726,0.105682455,0.015307166,0.03996421,0.013973905,0.0005387818],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045093242,0.00046395892,0.0033134543,0.0005066062,0.000049314465,0.0007578355,0.72026104,0.00045210816,0.0012989999,0.20558555,0.014515406,0.05275064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008551715,0.00021630766,0.002608845,0.002410964,0.00003858562,0.0013743726,0.42023456,0.0023968217,0.0009205471,0.36105022,0.20848978,0.00017341973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002637543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037590337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07451229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010300748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03582734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39406335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408192493","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111070","title":"Protected area edges host more warm-dwelling bird communities than the rest of the landscape","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Academy of Finland","keywords":"Host (biology); Geography; Rest (music); Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.04256484684176904,"score_gpt":0.24857648267668483,"score_spread":0.2060116358349158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408192493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983974,0.00016139234,0.00021519503,0.000008532087,0.0000021152784,0.0000036937968,0.00012054805,0.0000050054628,0.0010860247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991543,0.000074912234,0.0003542564,0.000009347179,0.00000256691,0.0000030224023,0.00018317485,0.0000028468598,0.00021552584],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998511,0.000024767784,0.000007788381,0.000044303928,0.000030257119,0.00004177693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993812,0.000075934695,0.0002769664,0.00003936353,0.00008911314,0.00013735004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001885314,0.00013335719,0.00020125885,0.0006792231,0.00056390424,0.0005221427,0.00013540906,0.00009665928,0.0019883134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047342022,0.000079141886,0.00010274693,0.00060121185,0.0003994128,0.00035905497,0.00039158738,0.000184252,0.00015320613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013459503,0.000040020404,0.968018,0.00007799962,0.00011019364,0.00008240869,0.00092682685,0.00021532319,0.011072035,0.000186825,0.00020810471,0.018927634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.039542e-7,0.0000090812455,0.99928087,0.000004611976,0.000004842583,0.000029019664,0.00018728795,0.000043657088,0.000088696484,0.000021154921,0.00032905032,0.0000011823023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030890848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17622331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030890848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040805692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032814036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06142211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409181276","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111109","title":"Continental declines in North American small mammal populations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mammal; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.07484642545319886,"score_gpt":0.2993634067095292,"score_spread":0.22451698125633035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409181276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964065,0.00056949107,0.000111773166,0.00019120393,0.000006903942,0.000003284632,0.00047389028,0.00001022301,0.0022266537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99839395,0.0003180153,0.000186429,0.00008085439,0.000009683018,0.000004399313,0.0007151252,0.000002156954,0.0002894905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981374,0.00004346458,0.000016305108,0.000053548836,0.000048902617,0.000024068428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880207,0.00016190152,0.00031194097,0.0001249591,0.00048938073,0.000109764944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000690247,0.00009018832,0.00014362314,0.0006496744,0.00037437605,0.00051454984,0.00026806287,0.00018266907,0.0012484578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002093972,0.00006962155,0.00012205279,0.0009396116,0.0003088868,0.00044899003,0.00030591188,0.0002181838,0.00015737818],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002778197,0.000013088877,0.9810146,0.000022671416,0.00006180552,0.000034981982,0.0006016025,0.00023132387,0.00062353053,0.00013748751,0.0007390654,0.016492052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.489798e-7,0.000004739754,0.99893624,0.000004531365,0.0000046986006,0.000017559943,0.00016387213,0.00009536352,0.000022583587,0.000021777472,0.00072737306,9.2714725e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078599505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18355007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078599505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054012047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033809917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15628403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409588495","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111159","title":"Vehicle collisions and visitor disturbance reduce survival and reproductive success of kangaroos in a national park","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Australian National University; University of Melbourne; Université de Sherbrooke; Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment","keywords":"National park; Visitor pattern; Disturbance (geology); Geography; Reproductive success; Wildlife; Ecology; Demography; Biology; Archaeology; Population; Computer science","score_opus":0.024768017249016873,"score_gpt":0.27042920412367616,"score_spread":0.2456611868746593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409588495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99985135,0.00002456982,0.000015201155,0.0000061568235,6.0767866e-7,0.000001018447,0.0000198667,0.0000015669093,0.00007977638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997155,0.00002152104,0.00003964033,0.0000083597515,0.0000012120228,0.0000021605795,0.00005214884,9.254085e-7,0.0001585586],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998373,0.000043606975,0.000013668204,0.000044979883,0.000024410587,0.000035934794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989447,0.00010711061,0.0005658469,0.000060467475,0.00004615574,0.0002756394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028960532,0.00017631962,0.00013286699,0.00036330026,0.00028857976,0.00025544054,0.00031911017,0.00020407797,0.0010705155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010968726,0.00017692539,0.00019508062,0.00017215082,0.00032062945,0.00031273832,0.00041034853,0.0002447314,0.00014581293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007856352,0.00007324245,0.9958477,0.000009030286,0.000040501556,0.0001076696,0.00021002504,0.00007134602,0.0017770823,0.000010080432,0.000057006906,0.0017177518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001089911,0.00009036904,0.9994618,0.0000024984763,0.000007551721,0.000053980755,0.00018229248,0.000086587475,0.000057678204,0.00000963225,0.00004538519,0.0000010472829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00910542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03604619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00910542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026194073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001911956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018104851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409979079","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111186","title":"Merging coastal archaeology and conservation paleobiology to evaluate shellfish resilience to Indigenous harvest over the past 3000 years","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre; Assembly of First Nations; University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Hakai Institute; Co-operative Education and Work-Integrated Learning Canada; University of Victoria","keywords":"Resilience (materials science); Indigenous; Paleobiology; Geography; Shellfish; Archaeology; Conservation; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Paleontology; Aquatic animal; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.028692233466226406,"score_gpt":0.27440937489153866,"score_spread":0.24571714142531226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409979079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99057627,0.001133484,0.001150758,0.0001272444,0.00001765646,0.000037952334,0.0017408719,0.000023892835,0.005191812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905557,0.0016971678,0.004019788,0.00012847182,0.000017210448,0.00006725907,0.0020425797,0.000021311536,0.0014503645],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936885,0.00012677303,0.000065971326,0.00012827547,0.00020102845,0.00010908723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978581,0.00018630941,0.0004773857,0.00027555946,0.0009396375,0.00026304825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013542946,0.00036837676,0.0002521461,0.0049183597,0.0011584167,0.001917459,0.00042798623,0.00027950044,0.0010622173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024275675,0.00031116622,0.00024300639,0.0047961436,0.0006813178,0.0005239789,0.0019032031,0.00034564,0.00023044518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022838609,0.000009669996,0.98129016,0.000060625316,0.000100782985,0.00006668429,0.0017194202,0.00011529807,0.0008087741,0.000054532386,0.00023695672,0.015514104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.058877e-7,0.000010350502,0.99505323,0.000045240016,0.00001959968,0.00006875265,0.0031735422,0.00009331857,0.00010990394,0.000044192788,0.0013766485,0.0000043162577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2768745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6971297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2768745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012618112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016893061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55052584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410093099","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111156","title":"Operationalising Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas criteria for ecosystem-based conservation and management: The Bay of Biscay case","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coastal and Marine Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca; HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme; Generalitat de Catalunya; UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Bay; Ecosystem; Marine ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04153340421750547,"score_gpt":0.27748021800145417,"score_spread":0.23594681378394872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410093099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732352,0.0002661069,0.0015494493,0.0009990743,0.000022855716,0.00010272511,0.00010666707,0.000007407544,0.023710562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971527,0.00007781452,0.0019645242,0.000059702415,0.0000053078784,0.000028094422,0.00004606499,0.0000042092447,0.00066149596],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967714,0.0014690406,0.00015926246,0.00021954882,0.0006893882,0.0006913878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99355847,0.0027739976,0.0008841531,0.00042656943,0.0012161235,0.0011406344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007518572,0.0006235672,0.00040962233,0.0028916178,0.00200352,0.00532198,0.001214918,0.0011636679,0.0022613916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017994732,0.00021709892,0.00046074291,0.0026849806,0.0043999585,0.0016474662,0.0030509604,0.0013706693,0.000074391675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042281311,0.00057181716,0.8340527,0.00008229554,0.0001280144,0.0018008449,0.0045713163,0.01125854,0.0013424862,0.10346094,0.0033688776,0.038939357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016320412,0.0006327655,0.8221547,0.00039579882,0.00030462875,0.0018168326,0.048463684,0.07969265,0.0022732608,0.02812858,0.015821477,0.00015238447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27165765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41186744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27165765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068413634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073415684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54015285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410219176","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111105","title":"Intense international exploitation of African hornbills necessitates urgent conservation measures, including CITES listing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Credit Valley Hospital","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"CITES; Listing (finance); Geography; Business; Fishery; Biology; Finance","score_opus":0.06865926499137316,"score_gpt":0.28137746096929245,"score_spread":0.2127181959779193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410219176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900119,0.001016658,0.00043045916,0.00031765536,0.00001943334,0.00002138887,0.00048152325,0.00001003624,0.007691052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938996,0.0012817864,0.0017161523,0.00018015584,0.00003778667,0.000021825786,0.0007027697,0.0000055489572,0.0021543198],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982435,0.000036508747,0.000013227838,0.000030244451,0.00005431006,0.000041396073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931693,0.000078308556,0.00045923106,0.00003576758,0.00005916291,0.000050545008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039252083,0.00023661765,0.00015241651,0.0008996829,0.00077984005,0.0007018968,0.00016497276,0.00022371308,0.0049081086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000812655,0.00006991563,0.00014372356,0.0014202975,0.00041601973,0.00079705834,0.00068310095,0.000311619,0.00040677682],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032605407,0.000035161404,0.9210248,0.00014999889,0.000046634854,0.00094156404,0.0014032047,0.00024295755,0.004510001,0.00136034,0.0014399205,0.068812825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015261004,0.000053443127,0.9758916,0.000095162985,0.000019759125,0.0011656402,0.004505929,0.00030313132,0.00049081503,0.0004967825,0.016969094,0.0000071220134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00778701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0407986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00778701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004040102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003822267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016419291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410235487","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111214","title":"Variable social-ecological indicators across a Tanzanian protected area network","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Canadian Anthropology Society; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; African Wildlife Foundation","keywords":"Variable (mathematics); Geography; Ecology; Environment variable; Protected area; Tanzania; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.024215704513156133,"score_gpt":0.2370232457342204,"score_spread":0.21280754122106427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410235487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994708,0.000010784733,0.000050288276,0.000014595334,6.104521e-7,0.000004429888,0.00018684396,0.0000010190405,0.00026064532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996942,0.0000044234225,0.00008540886,0.0000019613963,3.5703295e-7,0.0000064877327,0.00013784625,3.7761401e-7,0.00006905467],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995474,0.00020234028,0.000028131803,0.000063636115,0.000060302405,0.0000981931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743,0.0006443091,0.0009631784,0.00012086732,0.00052862504,0.00031285873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080887985,0.00012733617,0.0001281583,0.0018173852,0.0006072955,0.00055068167,0.00036176416,0.00015397044,0.0010402869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033936452,0.000092913855,0.00008519477,0.0022147852,0.0004873777,0.00039584434,0.0012297075,0.00019509457,0.00008055815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011202837,0.000028263416,0.9926415,0.000017492159,0.000032423828,0.0000635483,0.001490967,0.00081625156,0.00035974474,0.00043911167,0.00030364134,0.0036949362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026151845,0.000024881798,0.9968861,0.0000074553686,0.000010599046,0.00002283208,0.0013457331,0.0013734518,0.00004169453,0.0000711869,0.00021071675,0.0000027366546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04094412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.116939716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04094412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012667002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005905024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0814116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410286809","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111211","title":"Spatial scale and conservation options for carpet sharks","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Geography; Fishery; Cartography; Biology","score_opus":0.025573387164287854,"score_gpt":0.26052211404784476,"score_spread":0.2349487268835569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410286809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9668217,0.00071583694,0.00051066244,0.0017437077,0.00002181274,0.00001557369,0.00017216103,0.000022100698,0.02997641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998569,0.00012176241,0.00022668431,0.000071461334,0.000011191382,0.0000063740617,0.000059965085,0.0000020674177,0.00093150465],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999706,0.00006633886,0.000017789207,0.000049092003,0.000056383004,0.00010439027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992269,0.000120959034,0.00029703823,0.0000551046,0.000093949624,0.00020596675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065992144,0.00015422185,0.00011395339,0.0010872724,0.0006085577,0.0009428571,0.00076477573,0.00034985624,0.0076163895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018007546,0.00010498694,0.00022591252,0.00059738604,0.0010142226,0.00086505985,0.000840915,0.00023228163,0.00029098085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005957004,0.00022650948,0.83336234,0.0002779782,0.0001085373,0.0009517699,0.0018520838,0.007216393,0.0044834623,0.01589815,0.0059995954,0.12902743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037810634,0.00019208637,0.968997,0.0001792699,0.000058554608,0.0005853861,0.009157757,0.003148976,0.00042379738,0.006964004,0.010225173,0.000030205612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008115818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036490966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008115818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005386198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004625105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025479376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410330041","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111218","title":"The use and abuse of ecosystem service concepts and terms","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Ecosystem services; Service (business); Geography; Environmental planning; Business; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.03775945717127686,"score_gpt":0.24670785717440946,"score_spread":0.2089484000031326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410330041","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066920444,0.1980551,0.23668838,0.15284298,0.014640244,0.00017996528,0.0015141206,0.00042947463,0.3287293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72945076,0.07108141,0.14784878,0.023169152,0.006673441,0.0007984831,0.00090258586,0.0004941439,0.019581234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772215,0.013488458,0.0023640303,0.0016113231,0.004115623,0.001199157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97812825,0.015387747,0.002503529,0.00131633,0.0020701836,0.0005939794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015790422,0.0013279396,0.0009514685,0.008118609,0.00385664,0.009036598,0.0028208846,0.0033912384,0.002033517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02360326,0.00042297007,0.0009450363,0.015796173,0.025300618,0.01305796,0.0058280686,0.005022632,0.0007374539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000144501555,0.000005781642,0.00050931395,0.00017794679,0.000010830865,0.00010580902,0.0048115905,0.00017147855,0.0001637735,0.97535557,0.005512808,0.013160626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066943553,0.000029297296,0.0015988165,0.0010639826,0.000028177516,0.00087712164,0.008095024,0.0014984361,0.0003437684,0.5383914,0.44801557,0.00005172792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00762965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071898485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015790422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055788457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044678263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08350873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410386299","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111246","title":"Outdoor recreation in protected areas affects animal-mediated seed dispersal","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Colegiul Consultativ pentru Cercetare-Dezvoltare şi Inovare; Ministerio de Universidades; Narodowe Centrum Nauki; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii; Universidad de León; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Réseau de cancérologie Rossy","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Recreation; Seed dispersal; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.055572626476655,"score_gpt":0.23394566012546072,"score_spread":0.17837303364880572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410386299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99956626,0.000021539654,0.000018448667,0.000010838722,0.0000010765184,6.5417805e-7,0.000014978906,0.0000012673037,0.0003649043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99968386,0.000010199525,0.000024163475,0.0000044980293,0.0000011054614,0.0000011551488,0.000018103683,0.000001388462,0.00025550346],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997774,0.00008248276,0.000010300541,0.000048556674,0.00001600704,0.000065378794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981907,0.0005891214,0.0005714041,0.00013138371,0.000056850124,0.0004604942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027531586,0.00012589786,0.0001928059,0.00034265226,0.00028893544,0.00080042524,0.00029368288,0.00031337645,0.0053867516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016982146,0.00012451533,0.00028561705,0.00023284862,0.00042690968,0.00031082114,0.0005277145,0.0003119632,0.00030013523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008740507,0.0004929338,0.98591435,0.000019770705,0.00017752955,0.00028116416,0.00033029294,0.00034585432,0.006273286,0.00014785047,0.00015479767,0.0049882024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039795923,0.00008606571,0.9992248,0.000001839686,0.000014552828,0.0000544207,0.00021797157,0.00018602713,0.00011429212,0.00002637417,0.00006833207,0.0000012827262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003655898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012548742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053867516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023551949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016148327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018020451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410431210","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111245","title":"The potential of abandoned tree plantations to support the recovery of the mammal community","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mammal; Geography; Tree (set theory); Agroforestry; Ecology; Forestry; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.026461017595125237,"score_gpt":0.24474921245522827,"score_spread":0.21828819486010304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410431210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759361,0.00052256696,0.0005430081,0.0051491004,0.000064568085,0.000021293572,0.00006829967,0.000015375894,0.017679757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771225,0.00021894608,0.00041744133,0.00018788344,0.000033667402,0.000010987541,0.00003120926,0.0000027750825,0.0013848605],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945503,0.00025508954,0.000007013367,0.000023330294,0.000062038445,0.00019747656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977768,0.0005650822,0.00033037172,0.00014727855,0.0002698808,0.0009105534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094810536,0.00011404254,0.00007354847,0.00038174455,0.001115596,0.0010513924,0.00075687806,0.0005653274,0.0060342057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004122592,0.00007470248,0.0001126513,0.00026571497,0.00091011886,0.00069201255,0.0010306358,0.00044812955,0.00044014535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013155532,0.001557939,0.49288982,0.00027429822,0.0001782188,0.002351875,0.0055345334,0.0045146267,0.006696029,0.015977606,0.019760478,0.44894907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025153218,0.0017374917,0.8830101,0.00048127788,0.00011692204,0.0018944831,0.021532929,0.008427532,0.0010304443,0.008276257,0.07319568,0.00004539056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008828509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06200641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008828509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006684105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002462077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020186424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411010200","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111207","title":"Estimating the landscape-scale abundance of an arboreal folivore using thermal imaging drones and binomial N-mixture modelling","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"National Parks and Wildlife Service; Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales; Taronga Conservation Society Australia; Ecological Society of Australia; Paddy Pallin Foundation; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; Equity Trustees; Australian Academy of Science; Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment","keywords":"Arboreal locomotion; Abundance (ecology); Scale (ratio); Ecology; Geography; Environmental science; Biology; Habitat; Cartography","score_opus":0.019387954929396302,"score_gpt":0.24167562603304332,"score_spread":0.22228767110364703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411010200","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45543608,0.00023059484,0.5427654,0.00013318812,0.000019003875,0.00011390381,0.00028680972,0.00035179945,0.0006632919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88394153,0.00012270661,0.11428372,0.000045270786,0.000023066466,0.00014137336,0.0005917302,0.000040615472,0.00080996513],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780744,0.0012317933,0.00013546347,0.0004978447,0.00020855432,0.000118982294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99141616,0.006137052,0.0012778682,0.000630137,0.00038943405,0.00014939457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00647164,0.000877935,0.0009614643,0.0017018935,0.00049997546,0.0012834234,0.0017655023,0.000893152,0.0008861173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017467812,0.0010075805,0.0020325882,0.0008489977,0.0009797356,0.0014189712,0.0015453118,0.0009929002,0.00025551266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036194362,0.0001495627,0.1733988,0.00012615454,0.00066608394,0.000137797,0.00058535783,0.758621,0.005373295,0.0051880977,0.00033772716,0.055054203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007841309,0.0000324994,0.013465926,0.000010116092,0.0000284986,0.000044640292,0.000035057354,0.9842324,0.00035611686,0.0016183872,0.0001433156,0.000025226649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025654607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03234654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025654607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008725047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059285486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05101055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411195084","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111284","title":"Marine monitors: Land-based citizen science observations show AIS data underrepresents coastal vessel traffic co-occurring with marine mammals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Marine Alliance for Science and Technology for Scotland; UK Research and Innovation; Heriot-Watt University","keywords":"Citizen science; Marine species; Marine protected area; Geography; Oceanography; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.10942881529762359,"score_gpt":0.3131640352010565,"score_spread":0.2037352199034329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411195084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97466475,0.00012370327,0.002266301,0.00014524508,0.000024092518,0.00009565816,0.008972684,0.00019285093,0.013514725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98641706,0.00019132442,0.002919932,0.00013972586,0.000026854264,0.00010542163,0.0074428692,0.000022660794,0.0027342152],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918574,0.00013566599,0.000061924504,0.0001690077,0.00035521464,0.00009242754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661714,0.00045901796,0.001614264,0.00030701066,0.0007918377,0.00021080983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000891412,0.00030385944,0.00027696477,0.0014644461,0.0003983946,0.0008067883,0.00040900405,0.0003049803,0.002564269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031557067,0.00014141094,0.00027662958,0.0023367982,0.00022176522,0.0006806815,0.0008678503,0.00024993403,0.0009902036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058520374,0.000026087255,0.97203267,0.0001307237,0.000055751672,0.00012927836,0.0009946097,0.00019193656,0.0028527395,0.000070736765,0.0029599834,0.020496959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002191405,0.000045414265,0.99509984,0.000021458993,0.000014671954,0.00008975036,0.0009905265,0.00038590826,0.00032481615,0.000029573901,0.0029905022,0.000005342855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032759666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0717532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032759666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036251938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038479778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06513798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411508505","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111313","title":"The spatial distribution of tests of conservation interventions does not align with global conservation needs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Regent College","funders":"Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond; Imperial College London; Cambridge Philosophical Society","keywords":"Distribution (mathematics); Nature Conservation; Geography; Environmental resource management; Spatial distribution; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Remote sensing; Mathematics","score_opus":0.023206287959941306,"score_gpt":0.2630334375636898,"score_spread":0.23982714960374849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411508505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7565961,0.106560886,0.055342294,0.01765242,0.0008675321,0.0039989604,0.020705074,0.0010364184,0.03724025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792175,0.0032756035,0.011622009,0.0015974776,0.00010747504,0.0016194009,0.002113468,0.00015493136,0.00029203936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.6699392,0.19162628,0.07092112,0.03651729,0.024970263,0.0060257735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2824264,0.55872035,0.086729005,0.04471173,0.025025917,0.0023866605],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2032724,0.0011398238,0.0029901068,0.015022994,0.0015292082,0.006219927,0.003410984,0.0019917418,0.0077458993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5443802,0.0014855561,0.004541703,0.02350362,0.0071137496,0.009523215,0.010193936,0.0029027478,0.0010724533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022111414,0.00020328604,0.77187544,0.04141426,0.027086744,0.0005220302,0.014653631,0.005357189,0.0022991225,0.014184959,0.0053200256,0.11487222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086932775,0.0013001659,0.8741752,0.019699167,0.015994456,0.001278252,0.021459285,0.004897427,0.0017905913,0.025638582,0.03268177,0.00021575522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058648908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009829735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7967276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002778806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046598297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.982507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412074701","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111343","title":"The role of ‘bright spots’ in elevating conservation success in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Spots; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.009930808414335706,"score_gpt":0.2040001034516352,"score_spread":0.19406929503729947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412074701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95752364,0.00034529855,0.00034906043,0.0059127784,0.000047767604,0.000023477589,0.0001786494,0.000039577855,0.03557984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969267,0.00006599193,0.00017040549,0.00017004609,0.0000049568202,0.000003277974,0.000018429262,0.00000852555,0.0026316424],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985037,0.00025660044,0.000024451067,0.000109632994,0.00030815613,0.0007975814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926857,0.0007516107,0.0005523033,0.0001681993,0.0017160077,0.0041262275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013536589,0.000112599955,0.00022629536,0.0009942482,0.008849923,0.0032228793,0.0011267156,0.0007876727,0.00623942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004726913,0.00021207008,0.00014379375,0.0012558049,0.0049757473,0.0007950694,0.0021979306,0.0011647963,0.00021778661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005040972,0.00036750422,0.7276221,0.00022862683,0.0001309777,0.0009098402,0.032910515,0.0020403792,0.0028044677,0.03581748,0.044872455,0.15179156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025862708,0.00007543858,0.93367857,0.00010055248,0.00003597904,0.00009524541,0.034229703,0.0010986087,0.0004231771,0.0034078732,0.026777958,0.000050965442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9686743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99566036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031325698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030139584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043623045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21867901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412106872","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111339","title":"The sound of recovery: Integrating acoustics into fish status assessments and recovery strategies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sound (geography); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Environmental science; Acoustics; Fishery; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.04052412581921868,"score_gpt":0.30581291274523315,"score_spread":0.2652887869260145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412106872","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03749346,0.54616,0.2163543,0.084054425,0.004893533,0.0005880792,0.0019303504,0.0010222393,0.107503586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30673045,0.47758105,0.18179117,0.008140065,0.0054828865,0.00053083303,0.0010836261,0.00026226905,0.018397706],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976222,0.00079424307,0.00017335881,0.00026333818,0.0010014445,0.00014536371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919407,0.004527139,0.000750709,0.00023688455,0.002266573,0.0002779555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008764618,0.000938847,0.00091742707,0.0041164043,0.0004520204,0.0030433699,0.0011519322,0.0016842249,0.0032185365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010874231,0.00035292024,0.0006935364,0.0025257526,0.0017789892,0.0038200389,0.0028316504,0.0019078754,0.0006836884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065749045,0.00006729316,0.012436137,0.0013312101,0.00011080037,0.000042317228,0.00043313915,0.002076802,0.0010178373,0.0059614233,0.0092055155,0.9672518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072019866,0.0014800605,0.24291801,0.019927874,0.0011346616,0.0014792457,0.011928902,0.020899247,0.005266188,0.11010786,0.5843717,0.0004142663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016479015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037336912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016479015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015616257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028460596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046352327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412419513","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111318","title":"Market patterns within Indonesia's songbird trade","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"Business School, Queensland University of Technology; Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan; Queensland University of Technology","keywords":"Songbird; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.02701065671503118,"score_gpt":0.24993957078901205,"score_spread":0.22292891407398086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412419513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983753,0.00003259678,0.00011926853,0.000031481428,0.0000012577663,0.0000026127195,0.00017758625,0.000002731211,0.0012571147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99949,0.000018662915,0.0000930061,0.000006073053,0.0000013917639,0.0000022065944,0.00013238967,0.000002101547,0.00025401358],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984396,0.000027020342,0.000013092751,0.000051767034,0.000029951805,0.000034244287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926096,0.00021819909,0.00028852673,0.000031229043,0.000084751264,0.00011639792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024335443,0.00009675749,0.0001679364,0.00086575083,0.00034685293,0.0010121728,0.00026836665,0.00021375503,0.0026652426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009619289,0.00013372672,0.00018554994,0.0009872956,0.00047125542,0.0007533385,0.0004762155,0.00029373472,0.00027548627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006703134,0.000037330556,0.9887884,0.000027888193,0.000033534707,0.00027949762,0.0014411722,0.0011454709,0.0016758211,0.00071242405,0.00035221715,0.0054391734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014238993,0.000012942103,0.99295557,0.000008282946,0.000005279471,0.00011841717,0.001829272,0.0041714404,0.00012629545,0.00019596104,0.00056956825,0.000005476186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014522758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036264006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014522758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071819196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017930489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028876483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412524871","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111370","title":"Effect of drought on wildlife activity at artificial waterholes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Wildlife; Geography; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.02005739747983208,"score_gpt":0.2598409538477608,"score_spread":0.2397835563679287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412524871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996543,0.000027199121,0.000038172915,0.000013144761,0.0000017189209,0.000002018677,0.00008059825,0.000001403598,0.00018145419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997569,0.00003341804,0.000051654824,0.000007082089,0.0000017377166,0.000003651253,0.00006930299,6.018208e-7,0.00007557449],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997886,0.00006302983,0.000012988607,0.00004235963,0.000028820717,0.000064220476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918836,0.00019039938,0.00036149446,0.00002999323,0.00007539211,0.00015431191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025514115,0.00015075086,0.00014165265,0.00045278625,0.0004118055,0.00037189224,0.00020486131,0.00020760203,0.000989091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010409843,0.00008424102,0.00012788094,0.0005202539,0.00043505125,0.00036687503,0.0005065705,0.00019728375,0.000068119676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022107273,0.000076314114,0.9797133,0.000051857696,0.0000652609,0.0004901638,0.0011875333,0.0005981136,0.009584461,0.00006206121,0.00019535684,0.007754394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013448337,0.00005886865,0.9985764,0.000005294158,0.0000059364406,0.00006405703,0.00063714164,0.00020972606,0.00018044256,0.000013013962,0.00024530102,0.0000024189671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0097624175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0342039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0097624175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005310309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002266668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019411147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412656352","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111392","title":"Contemporary genetic adaptation in zoos and conservation breeding programs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Adaptation (eye); Geography; Captive breeding; Conservation genetics; Biology; Ecology; Zoology; Environmental ethics; Endangered species; Habitat; Genetics; Neuroscience; Microsatellite; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05840756577730152,"score_gpt":0.2643925911015905,"score_spread":0.205985025324289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412656352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9562334,0.0154329045,0.0020893454,0.0043643564,0.00007275201,0.000016449992,0.000094089926,0.000019532874,0.021677291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99492186,0.0031277102,0.00041337227,0.00022356701,0.000071876435,0.000006637465,0.000036596444,0.0000027403917,0.0011956134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941134,0.0002622597,0.000022190388,0.00013227678,0.00009300374,0.000078953235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942255,0.00012930452,0.00018193726,0.000041797353,0.00008405873,0.00014032153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012690985,0.000102635095,0.0001401745,0.0005454663,0.00050323724,0.0008584077,0.00051023724,0.00047475472,0.0026758576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016338868,0.00007719342,0.000052878353,0.0013394023,0.0029126408,0.00062274426,0.00045155015,0.00038657253,0.000098964185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000521999,0.00043914787,0.4646852,0.00038746165,0.000097279684,0.0008157547,0.005500299,0.0039644185,0.015887268,0.061341457,0.0032721632,0.4430876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011244999,0.00018826543,0.9681515,0.000076324584,0.000014028944,0.00036201935,0.003807766,0.0005160158,0.00040627384,0.007095333,0.0193564,0.000014769705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0106373895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024626324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0106373895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017476062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009836945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021150947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412720782","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111394","title":"A comprehensive framework for managing human-wildlife conflicts: The case of smallholder livestock depredation by puma (Puma concolor) in the Argentine Dry Chaco","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Conservation Leadership Programme","keywords":"Puma; Wildlife; Livestock; Geography; Human–wildlife conflict; Fishery; Environmental protection; Environmental resource management; Business; Ecology; Forestry; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.055137646225717006,"score_gpt":0.3066217949379151,"score_spread":0.2514841487121981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412720782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19055521,0.0082867555,0.14214382,0.117809385,0.00067163474,0.0022575944,0.00054231635,0.00024185043,0.5374914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91683835,0.0019738926,0.06339883,0.0018283922,0.00013616754,0.0005390855,0.00012677719,0.000029982126,0.015128502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967619,0.00152609,0.00010570034,0.00020869613,0.0003610829,0.0010363678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978557,0.00062286976,0.00021929794,0.0000994354,0.00037125847,0.00083129137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006680471,0.0010296867,0.0006607251,0.002870944,0.010581726,0.014381132,0.004967213,0.008064673,0.006444251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039579854,0.0005107786,0.0008011341,0.0020319007,0.008999533,0.0039074263,0.0071094534,0.0037682555,0.00024064493],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028804976,0.00025846323,0.004098343,0.00020095437,0.000072223345,0.00352962,0.010465202,0.046446703,0.0005881,0.89352685,0.0138704805,0.026914215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009139512,0.00021928479,0.008139265,0.0016990424,0.00014679633,0.0015821923,0.08645182,0.065802924,0.00047179125,0.64281213,0.19241597,0.00016735466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12973128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.285508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12973128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014170294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030413883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25795233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413119560","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111403","title":"Inferring the role of habitat heterogeneity in SLOSS (single large or several small) for beetles, spiders, and birds in forest reserves","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"German Academic Exchange Service; Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten; Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.06211961889556304,"score_gpt":0.2507704107044448,"score_spread":0.18865079180888172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413119560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985055,0.0001724976,0.00082798814,0.000018546389,0.0000020900038,0.000003928306,0.00007940738,0.000007774057,0.000382312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997677,0.000008924446,0.0001439863,0.000004460272,0.0000021893,0.0000018070211,0.00005325329,0.0000020298833,0.000015768059],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977851,0.00065499765,0.00020245429,0.0009218287,0.00021274631,0.00022278765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98604923,0.007195963,0.0040693036,0.0014139218,0.00049087574,0.0007806556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002948545,0.00045810518,0.00048241267,0.0032198234,0.0006345565,0.0013135787,0.0006169607,0.00062564923,0.0015680991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008299396,0.00036062632,0.0010341539,0.0015324996,0.0020887423,0.0016546304,0.0018545724,0.00047441566,0.00021349372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080077916,0.000009993624,0.9955676,0.000018450635,0.00016240549,0.000049442147,0.0002215801,0.0004073172,0.0012479582,0.00014848064,0.00002740778,0.0020592685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003169234,0.000031980184,0.9980242,0.0000051552,0.000025998936,0.00009362103,0.00034035798,0.0008942285,0.00019451728,0.00031020728,0.0000696286,0.0000070002015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00411321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052558114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00411321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004165773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001930296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015593529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413313020","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111429","title":"The Zoo Sphere of Influence Model","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo","funders":"Chester Zoo; Department of Conservation, New Zealand; University of California","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.017210135285734174,"score_gpt":0.2184674789070961,"score_spread":0.20125734362136194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413313020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023166064,0.000695419,0.14829545,0.009604597,0.0006386942,0.00075025106,0.001297401,0.0005697646,0.8149824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8349525,0.0014543486,0.06325502,0.0013967819,0.0003576394,0.0013593148,0.0015220214,0.00031385527,0.095388524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99519944,0.0019850547,0.00017167187,0.0004429427,0.0016129148,0.00058799743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99515116,0.0014645058,0.00042131197,0.0003182458,0.0018433714,0.00080142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003824869,0.0009798944,0.00053351227,0.002751966,0.0023759548,0.006804144,0.0019267146,0.002219169,0.026117628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012253972,0.0004388236,0.001341841,0.0022308761,0.0035527777,0.0057567134,0.0041211415,0.0021798706,0.0034129769],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045743407,0.000054455257,0.0029163165,0.000098473036,0.000028626151,0.00019740744,0.0012189894,0.031519633,0.00017301472,0.9233959,0.022038056,0.018313425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087772714,0.00011485304,0.003915299,0.00027921208,0.00006536551,0.00028013517,0.0024959354,0.14962438,0.00040134016,0.3697056,0.47291848,0.00011169776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05671695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04624613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05671695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008943726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006887573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11277366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413485087","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111440","title":"The recovery of rodent-mediated seed dispersal processes after open-pit marble mining","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"China Postdoctoral Science Foundation; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Rodent; Open-pit mining; Biological dispersal; Seed dispersal; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Geology; Mining engineering","score_opus":0.02993355695755261,"score_gpt":0.27099310094603807,"score_spread":0.24105954398848545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413485087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997516,0.000030898664,0.000047808113,0.000011275276,0.0000010907845,0.0000019718432,0.000012824624,0.0000019246577,0.00014056411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995534,0.000017029171,0.0000446995,0.00000683856,0.000002049116,0.0000027234307,0.000036739573,9.4526195e-7,0.00033565576],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998586,0.000033052616,0.000007843552,0.000035966936,0.000024186884,0.00004031661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998594,0.00029261372,0.00058176013,0.00020687339,0.00013290586,0.00019190699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036891675,0.0001236062,0.00022401125,0.0002839505,0.00026606634,0.0003574721,0.0003371485,0.00047649478,0.0016772728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002584331,0.0000888467,0.00017972682,0.00014369273,0.0004301204,0.00031811144,0.000350129,0.00037227533,0.00020256161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005169373,0.0013510744,0.8716845,0.00008534405,0.0002553512,0.001123074,0.0014367732,0.0008454953,0.07852553,0.00044351112,0.00026900694,0.038810868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048659363,0.00029944733,0.9982547,0.0000038328253,0.000008815309,0.00010609049,0.00016808212,0.00041943998,0.00058258633,0.000058661193,0.0000908701,0.000002535876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035181704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0091380505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035181704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022315876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002328353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00699538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413900851","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111463","title":"Small patches have high conservation value for primates","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Conseil régional de Bourgogne-Franche-Comté; Erasmus+; Universidad Veracruzana","keywords":"Geography; Value (mathematics); Ecology; Biology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.1353864771866247,"score_gpt":0.35050619029920255,"score_spread":0.21511971311257785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413900851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98843575,0.0017539673,0.0014628925,0.00021536546,0.000012794984,0.0000087575,0.0002548138,0.00002528442,0.007830307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989159,0.00020822826,0.0005469607,0.000030595238,0.000022042894,0.000002688354,0.00011938559,0.000005702241,0.00014845737],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992366,0.0002634375,0.00006452589,0.00020874353,0.00015730421,0.000069374866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947843,0.002544967,0.0015049907,0.0006636636,0.00023605052,0.00026596934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073760113,0.00019646906,0.0004908127,0.001016643,0.0007938032,0.0013988807,0.0003443427,0.00032003544,0.005965758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048306524,0.00017535003,0.00034381586,0.0015286199,0.0014233231,0.0010870508,0.00092946115,0.00031728667,0.0004059546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014381662,0.000017795288,0.93542415,0.0002444181,0.0004224523,0.0002239683,0.0008350226,0.0005790158,0.0034624722,0.000989044,0.00047800777,0.057179756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003067839,0.000047459216,0.99546045,0.000030791663,0.00007818011,0.000506761,0.00073123956,0.00032127107,0.00017813584,0.0013041412,0.0013309917,0.0000075165185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002833086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006850889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005965758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026756673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016733477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019957483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414225755","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111438","title":"Mitigating collision-caused bird mortality through message framing: Insights from residents' intentions for bird-safe windows","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute for the Social Sciences, Cornell University","keywords":"Centrality; Wildlife; Normative; Biodiversity; Value (mathematics); Framing (construction); Cognition; Risk perception; Citizen science","score_opus":0.05704996559497539,"score_gpt":0.30433617722394307,"score_spread":0.2472862116289677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414225755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988834,0.000028300554,0.00019867136,0.00014574415,0.0000017203265,0.000015609596,0.000021719905,0.0000020528303,0.00070281554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899024,0.00009103961,0.0005423844,0.00006711368,0.0000031983627,0.000027984828,0.000040603216,0.0000015521874,0.00023585948],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999348,0.00032328852,0.000030384705,0.00007006911,0.000119712735,0.0001085293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99332786,0.0040187305,0.0014433335,0.00016933319,0.00069704716,0.00034359223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021343029,0.00023574325,0.000161576,0.0006411707,0.0005746339,0.0009550997,0.00034022072,0.0005453769,0.0013304688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011814908,0.00023273942,0.00036919277,0.00039602758,0.0007189284,0.0007772945,0.00060431845,0.0008177353,0.00015629143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019710575,0.0014467324,0.8695658,0.00020310323,0.00008436868,0.0002211131,0.09602839,0.0004427214,0.0024854348,0.0005848698,0.0004968118,0.028243495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002429537,0.0006037495,0.91729414,0.0001045736,0.000099389916,0.00007182688,0.076947235,0.00201961,0.0006986179,0.0007594778,0.0013417109,0.00003540364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019549597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035576064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019549597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084499654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015554611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038871646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415488842","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111559","title":"Who gets the spotlight? Disparities in seabird research attention at scientific conferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Seabird; Threatened species; IUCN Red List; Biodiversity; Taxon; Endangered species; Uria aalge; Taxonomic rank","score_opus":0.18761154496594734,"score_gpt":0.34811538300345996,"score_spread":0.16050383803751261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415488842","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3351604,0.37308294,0.0038925712,0.17180169,0.016633846,0.0005145186,0.012034103,0.0003559182,0.08652399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8336646,0.121592246,0.003529365,0.015643915,0.012786385,0.0006032052,0.0049250512,0.0002769669,0.006978333],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95902586,0.019056205,0.007977196,0.0029669479,0.007964042,0.0030096092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7545258,0.13324083,0.04835639,0.0054464536,0.0374316,0.020998947],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0552315,0.0004925181,0.0008887898,0.022515973,0.0020296604,0.009082307,0.0014560381,0.0015020538,0.013788854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18052025,0.0004545561,0.00091428787,0.019849116,0.0015574411,0.007882544,0.006098741,0.00119642,0.0020699035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013886581,0.00012805338,0.20604554,0.03446735,0.0010141876,0.0012334449,0.04922837,0.0004934372,0.00465592,0.010272872,0.16658555,0.52448666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011189424,0.00031979653,0.44884804,0.022443779,0.0005969477,0.0017522551,0.10884956,0.00036098997,0.0010683292,0.007661284,0.40776792,0.0002191713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033008782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006992748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97748405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039894083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00737291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29209554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415563992","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111552","title":"Increasing the credibility of conservation plans through citizen science","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Liber Ero Foundation; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","keywords":"Credibility; Citizen science; Field (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Representation (politics); Sampling (signal processing); Expert opinion","score_opus":0.08316813312659413,"score_gpt":0.30340132293927974,"score_spread":0.2202331898126856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415563992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6811357,0.0007936447,0.20472726,0.0093790395,0.0001318532,0.0021592826,0.0010367192,0.0006724593,0.099963926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93175024,0.00025740237,0.0659469,0.00023467974,0.000022212284,0.0002772137,0.00028746543,0.000051333,0.0011726061],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9737499,0.016061341,0.001059384,0.0019525113,0.006111046,0.0010658815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85720193,0.100177154,0.01298894,0.01366368,0.013717525,0.0022508067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0429371,0.0005963973,0.00052653626,0.004652219,0.0025793703,0.005638568,0.0014874672,0.001298253,0.005312382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11662197,0.00060894416,0.0005503511,0.0029668743,0.0037688336,0.004500285,0.004283288,0.0019624375,0.0003998808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079224556,0.0006328856,0.17813756,0.001222315,0.00036676286,0.0009063619,0.029066792,0.07841989,0.009104671,0.06590887,0.009218057,0.62622356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006390905,0.0016399762,0.28458065,0.003437959,0.00042668288,0.00080174353,0.04897815,0.22522552,0.012640919,0.18621902,0.2348381,0.00057227013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052873317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09810478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052873317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009913609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012557857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22707582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415566024","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111567","title":"Landscape heterogeneity supports bat diversity: Importance of wetlands and intermediate forest cover in coastal British Columbia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Wetland; Habitat; Biodiversity; Climate change; Bird conservation; Ecosystem; Habitat destruction; Ecosystem services","score_opus":0.019979938194548998,"score_gpt":0.21331962523766237,"score_spread":0.19333968704311338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415566024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99846774,0.00016609803,0.000026117272,0.0000790017,0.0000018269354,0.0000038377843,0.00023714246,0.0000031501986,0.0010150596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995023,0.00007896434,0.00003627463,0.000017211403,0.0000010343214,0.0000033546671,0.00010775794,0.0000015946322,0.0002514265],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996362,0.000050422426,0.000022841485,0.00008613358,0.000084470594,0.000119832715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836534,0.00023240328,0.0003193044,0.000069132446,0.0004776901,0.0005360925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002897321,0.00016613967,0.00023292458,0.0013502653,0.0016131073,0.0014048597,0.00063192635,0.0002922305,0.0026626496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015309651,0.0001984391,0.00016539867,0.0020412167,0.0009433509,0.00033674695,0.000892096,0.0003480112,0.0001616213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031802792,0.000016223788,0.99372536,0.000015232354,0.000025954161,0.000101611455,0.0007133152,0.000086255684,0.00054682884,0.000032871867,0.00025985876,0.004444551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.960726e-7,0.0000026232674,0.99880064,0.000009047334,0.0000044598946,0.00001615454,0.00092573155,0.000064733074,0.000011366799,0.0000076036886,0.0001550152,0.0000019611048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9272027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98341274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0727973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049104034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035867812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14645201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415778362","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111549","title":"Management interventions boost orchid conservation: Evidence from Guizhou, China","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Forestry and Grassland Administration; Guizhou University; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Species richness; Threatened species; Ex situ conservation; Biodiversity; China; Protected area; Species diversity; Global biodiversity; Nature reserve","score_opus":0.16782238234240182,"score_gpt":0.28807178735561173,"score_spread":0.12024940501320991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415778362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825052,0.013075897,0.0002935096,0.0009374574,0.000032841443,0.00007586203,0.00033633923,0.000028553204,0.0027143515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977458,0.0016833018,0.00015558496,0.00015281493,0.000010354515,0.000017631857,0.00009448556,0.0000018278322,0.00013819471],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990208,0.0004515287,0.000078457706,0.00016676953,0.00013374137,0.00014860173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980101,0.00082396774,0.0005980332,0.00015553314,0.00018576627,0.00022668298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017531059,0.00035868943,0.0003308352,0.0006806205,0.0005958044,0.00066473644,0.00062988495,0.00031170723,0.0024312192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041752416,0.00012548448,0.00063844625,0.00089370867,0.00087089586,0.00046862816,0.00068169134,0.00028413112,0.00005726951],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010675411,0.0004504806,0.82642376,0.0022548265,0.0015705418,0.00029735648,0.0018057612,0.0010371909,0.0013254295,0.0012103184,0.0012362358,0.16132051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111777976,0.00041651953,0.99491394,0.00023026964,0.0007863468,0.00003751778,0.0004760424,0.0004560391,0.00029187003,0.0002026363,0.0020676602,0.000009403762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067749955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13585982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067749955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019972469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023569749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1347112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416031665","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111607","title":"Promising governance approaches for reversing biodiversity loss","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fulbright Canada; Stanford University","keywords":"Corporate governance; Biodiversity; Indigenous; Multi-level governance; Restructuring; Politics; Environmental governance; Global biodiversity","score_opus":0.07383675120400929,"score_gpt":0.22652224407751972,"score_spread":0.15268549287351044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416031665","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031020634,0.0068138586,0.4315234,0.19836122,0.0012489758,0.0004670285,0.00012794921,0.00046770196,0.32996926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8726134,0.003167855,0.10127688,0.008452537,0.00040868987,0.00056969293,0.00007867053,0.00008545479,0.013346889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949351,0.0026550656,0.00016463743,0.00072252116,0.0008459059,0.0006768409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960288,0.0011608026,0.00067231065,0.00088946964,0.00074975286,0.0004990427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008257262,0.0006326706,0.00041939356,0.0015041019,0.002704913,0.0062118154,0.0019119731,0.0029272942,0.0049674343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008011963,0.00020453654,0.0006746395,0.00094512006,0.013008907,0.008625418,0.0059760767,0.003776976,0.00048790802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057499087,0.000024889106,0.00037973424,0.000049646675,0.000011203783,0.000029091934,0.00038893666,0.0023171075,0.00022329662,0.98395175,0.0017407101,0.010877863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012196277,0.000027536445,0.00048394868,0.00009748553,0.0000114119775,0.00002571844,0.0006721638,0.0020946576,0.00028448764,0.9679557,0.028323319,0.000011335237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021763472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046091806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008257262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047303825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007427072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043669045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416277651","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111527","title":"Guideposts and guardrails for biodiversity accounting in the 21st century","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Engineer Research and Development Center; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Nature; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Biodiversity; Biodiversity conservation; Global biodiversity","score_opus":0.030816152309442936,"score_gpt":0.24480998504722018,"score_spread":0.21399383273777725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416277651","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0092530195,0.023343515,0.26227817,0.6267296,0.011400968,0.0011133631,0.00046547607,0.0028568006,0.062559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.111407965,0.023630535,0.7572232,0.07523464,0.003514798,0.0022178,0.00067933474,0.0010100381,0.02508163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9250122,0.042771216,0.008363324,0.0038629475,0.017807702,0.002182609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8719287,0.06765422,0.008997983,0.018961737,0.026426133,0.006031338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.080614984,0.0028205574,0.0012431424,0.0043445844,0.0073047243,0.026189977,0.006454759,0.015604816,0.0051192828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12592848,0.0017288348,0.0013810956,0.003415279,0.029119106,0.034620598,0.013746282,0.034239586,0.0031709925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059704482,0.00012721258,0.0007119981,0.0005745399,0.000022278127,0.00039238643,0.009820155,0.0017595849,0.0006405423,0.7816099,0.10774482,0.09653689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028765859,0.000102133316,0.00048401396,0.0024320488,0.000018585177,0.00036006307,0.005815387,0.002077262,0.0006204617,0.35467938,0.63318133,0.00020062826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014840291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015010574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080614984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009826404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022550134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4263379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416376251","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111600","title":"Shadow under the lamp: Evidence-based assessments reveal local extirpation risk of large Indian civets (Viverra zibetha) concealed by intensive activity in human-dominated landscapes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Care Foundation","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Sympatric speciation; Leopard; Range (aeronautics); Biodiversity; Wildlife conservation; Population; Shadow (psychology); Conservation status; Taxon; Species distribution","score_opus":0.03696257518365347,"score_gpt":0.31091230624648575,"score_spread":0.27394973106283227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416376251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952055,0.00035823171,0.00228646,0.00011598879,0.0000050960166,0.000011746279,0.00018015789,0.000023680752,0.0018130951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992536,0.000051699233,0.0005452368,0.000009432097,0.0000032208063,0.0000033966496,0.00005717777,0.0000012054813,0.000075069285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998757,0.00060209027,0.000084061496,0.00021974945,0.0002020546,0.0001350742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99181753,0.0032940686,0.0032665706,0.00058464706,0.00065269164,0.00038460235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027511637,0.00036453566,0.00022556748,0.002774371,0.0003328396,0.0012118806,0.00062011107,0.0005081839,0.0012016635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009126741,0.0001812936,0.00029171805,0.0010283627,0.0006765927,0.0013972824,0.0013844591,0.0004804131,0.00014430321],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013480702,0.000041519113,0.96158767,0.00010081724,0.00020990164,0.00028841422,0.00053890067,0.003353368,0.000997868,0.00045951552,0.00027367723,0.032013707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075783532,0.00017428452,0.9643605,0.00009835513,0.0002858668,0.00039310212,0.0020608532,0.028990323,0.0008602113,0.0014178767,0.0013159832,0.00003512476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038581076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010630557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038581076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003901398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004275218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014549673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416683867","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111636","title":"A practical framework for ecological integrity monitoring in resource-limited parks","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hôpital Notre-Dame; Carleton University","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Staffing; Recreation; Resource (disambiguation); Monitoring and evaluation; Best practice; Adaptive management; Workflow; Capacity building","score_opus":0.14045866823522793,"score_gpt":0.3603813761513002,"score_spread":0.2199227079160723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416683867","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011037077,0.0013110766,0.7047974,0.12449988,0.00046546664,0.0035635696,0.00016789975,0.0004630448,0.15369456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18963997,0.0008201562,0.7888563,0.0058488264,0.00015026788,0.003850906,0.00013638691,0.00009484437,0.010602347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9373539,0.047641378,0.0026414352,0.003457938,0.005772221,0.0031330718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95774305,0.021785283,0.002540941,0.003179501,0.009226339,0.005524905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.094404586,0.0015097075,0.000682404,0.0049283253,0.01457199,0.014566286,0.00645401,0.012226737,0.0061089667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0407782,0.00094330235,0.0015989252,0.0025550434,0.04050593,0.010683139,0.012493576,0.009612021,0.0015041671],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010329325,0.0001822433,0.0011660573,0.00022359812,0.000008860403,0.00040913047,0.016341124,0.004297107,0.00035848634,0.9439992,0.008274521,0.02472938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059988826,0.00014695659,0.0012418464,0.0015584473,0.000022453629,0.00040364492,0.021475447,0.007651508,0.0006335192,0.7382808,0.22841874,0.00010676556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03882643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06294585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094404586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03322262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0870673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49926513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417439743","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111671","title":"Wildfires and the natural regeneration of a terra firme forest in the eastern Amazon region","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics","keywords":"Amazon rainforest; Seed dispersal; Regeneration (biology); Ecosystem; Abundance (ecology); Natural regeneration; Biological dispersal; Seedling; Species diversity; Dominance (genetics)","score_opus":0.017228260458365674,"score_gpt":0.22322916360264333,"score_spread":0.20600090314427766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417439743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994326,0.00009700763,0.000010422233,0.000082906365,0.0000015836763,0.0000010244826,0.000026404246,5.9216836e-7,0.00034742782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997801,0.00005519424,0.000013187124,0.000009024583,0.0000025062345,7.908117e-7,0.000019127574,4.2567257e-7,0.00011964965],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998392,0.00005954418,0.000009723945,0.000019877147,0.000023068867,0.000048424823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991474,0.00017528875,0.0003585226,0.000036454043,0.00007041654,0.00021190711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039370114,0.00008367921,0.000107868276,0.00037647705,0.0005899969,0.00055080664,0.00033065453,0.0002452647,0.0017203236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014009378,0.00010859008,0.00010533652,0.00044227412,0.0007394052,0.0002691125,0.00037787363,0.00026052626,0.00007396556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018181674,0.00009441429,0.99132454,0.000020415562,0.00006597185,0.0003964384,0.0010159581,0.00022346125,0.0015789035,0.00039808473,0.00017546752,0.0045244903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043895266,0.000015715466,0.99814713,0.0000036965776,0.00000764503,0.00010705337,0.0012379258,0.00018837037,0.000037960282,0.00005120249,0.00019743736,0.0000015538013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.096295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3752437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008806176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005943793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19146901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W567649335","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.015","title":"The importance of natural habitats to Brazilian free-tailed bats in intensive agricultural landscapes in the Winter Garden region of Texas, United States","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Bat Conservation International; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Predation; Biodiversity; Geography; Population; Agriculture; Agricultural land; Biology; Agroforestry","score_opus":0.0443806648906066,"score_gpt":0.2465175769831929,"score_spread":0.2021369120925863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W567649335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99898,0.00009976279,0.000028107923,0.000058497535,0.0000013572759,0.0000026536943,0.000051914638,6.876306e-7,0.0007770963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996698,0.00006897329,0.000059289498,0.000012608904,0.0000016402812,0.0000023355133,0.00003076142,5.853508e-7,0.000153911],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997875,0.000055972967,0.000013032169,0.000038952796,0.000029346384,0.00007530391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927324,0.00015236426,0.00025437586,0.000041553056,0.00012525698,0.00015329999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033531015,0.00013666197,0.0001374858,0.0008174189,0.0009783659,0.0008478622,0.00034902227,0.00019059188,0.0012097971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001093007,0.00012937163,0.000095417374,0.0006693728,0.0011848661,0.0003394875,0.00082846865,0.00016219019,0.000053985343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051501862,0.000039263738,0.98818874,0.000029800736,0.000026465392,0.00014885257,0.0026370813,0.00010891513,0.0013373416,0.0005215543,0.00018909715,0.0067214444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013029596,0.000007648635,0.9961428,0.0000074922746,0.00000546072,0.000050613653,0.003347768,0.000052620137,0.00002959561,0.000049112045,0.00030411113,0.000001436448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10593644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5526555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10593644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014129409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007704866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21063966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7089771026","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111492","title":"Art's role in non-material values research: Exploring values and environmental change in Maya Lin's What Is Missing?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Environmental change; Valuation (finance); Wildness; Natural (archaeology); Formative assessment; Maya","score_opus":0.16874742487748165,"score_gpt":0.3366999243839095,"score_spread":0.16795249950642785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7089771026","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07581856,0.013859459,0.0038327347,0.7533336,0.002096567,0.000029841225,0.000099159704,0.00007882807,0.15085115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91543823,0.008774555,0.0044467957,0.038648013,0.00093384035,0.00009217877,0.00003756825,0.000093567265,0.031535316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969319,0.0021515868,0.000037794754,0.00019363605,0.00036869576,0.00031642083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845387,0.010552,0.00064434035,0.0006885718,0.0017863403,0.0017901178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074091484,0.0003658074,0.000474967,0.0017031723,0.018790724,0.0150630735,0.0019149191,0.0029836658,0.0086002555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011761615,0.00021296815,0.00042642897,0.0021349327,0.028763253,0.011045178,0.005351303,0.0063049886,0.0003418051],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008624903,0.00019126461,0.008780227,0.00026378623,0.000060865703,0.0006004346,0.21013619,0.00035101973,0.00041773767,0.6048641,0.06606383,0.10818429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010878014,0.000035973615,0.0060992674,0.0005699528,0.00004533665,0.00022036785,0.21806306,0.0005734542,0.0006267622,0.32405543,0.449648,0.000051456555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15024139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01222296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013125244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11775458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095010707","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111573","title":"Creating a global kelp forest conservation fundraising target: A 14-billion-dollar investment to “help the kelp”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine and coastal plant biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Kelp; Kelp forest; Marine conservation; Context (archaeology); Ecosystem services; Investment (military); Biodiversity; Grassroots; Marine protected area","score_opus":0.03821953974740008,"score_gpt":0.24856683907163,"score_spread":0.2103472993242299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095010707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43669096,0.0033441596,0.17651385,0.052192584,0.00073544367,0.0028445872,0.005404037,0.00092764024,0.32134682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8915624,0.0014186581,0.089511946,0.0031755422,0.00006003937,0.0015731426,0.0022044536,0.00014339967,0.0103504285],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673367,0.0014768711,0.00009841774,0.00018854237,0.0008672511,0.0006352458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645066,0.0013956119,0.00038738482,0.00016584882,0.0011219971,0.00047846683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007587607,0.00089690724,0.00034110717,0.002033933,0.0014870627,0.004834516,0.0011624563,0.0020698889,0.0067909933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01162908,0.00022765572,0.00066324044,0.0017001147,0.00081440934,0.0040206807,0.0035494906,0.0017485564,0.00079650787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076832477,0.00063670217,0.03178873,0.0018236588,0.00030654072,0.002233717,0.005778654,0.13103378,0.011487382,0.3514818,0.10658376,0.35607696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026840676,0.0011046536,0.049506858,0.0023555157,0.00035571484,0.0012963982,0.01941277,0.1298019,0.017665619,0.2235037,0.55430627,0.00042226192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010307526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013321977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010307526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057827216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010308427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041956782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7105508605","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111593","title":"Compassionate conservation practice: supporting diverse conservation actions but context matters","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Regent College; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Conservation psychology; Context (archaeology); CLARITY; Thematic analysis; Action (physics); Flourishing; Compassionate Use","score_opus":0.04794517667353484,"score_gpt":0.32970068928583113,"score_spread":0.2817555126122963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7105508605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83761984,0.002198936,0.030404726,0.058050245,0.000468772,0.00060367567,0.000026896434,0.00011610093,0.07051071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985762,0.0005144179,0.00798426,0.004642048,0.000050584913,0.00020677208,0.000008918734,0.000013332263,0.00081777567],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9619245,0.028815338,0.00094665884,0.0017550049,0.0035060504,0.00305244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9620879,0.024656978,0.0031630187,0.0020138589,0.0021089024,0.00596934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022912547,0.0006140507,0.00062860426,0.0015807804,0.010606477,0.0059984787,0.0020384649,0.005726007,0.0031519155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030450387,0.0005404769,0.0004805544,0.0011934749,0.02112464,0.00790865,0.01883598,0.0047577056,0.00032920603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001010872,0.00033970815,0.011743214,0.0011097044,0.00004531993,0.0017845676,0.86827403,0.00036790615,0.004903472,0.02575797,0.0035896166,0.08198347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008155277,0.0005567516,0.01770735,0.0025641795,0.000058507794,0.0036980163,0.8424995,0.0014045192,0.001759907,0.044738255,0.084747866,0.00018362486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017950604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002867389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022912547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030481464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009101459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121174574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106271513","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111622","title":"Gaps in tipping points research across freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecosystem dynamics and resilience","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Ottawa; Université Laval; University of Toronto; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Carleton University","keywords":"Ecosystem; Terrestrial ecosystem; Climate change; Ecosystem ecology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.04739618011252337,"score_gpt":0.3279460033877612,"score_spread":0.2805498232752378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106271513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3518549,0.20313367,0.06480808,0.2803723,0.003929522,0.001850211,0.0018354765,0.0002930484,0.09192285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88044184,0.069247216,0.034869276,0.010308914,0.00063367776,0.0017339354,0.0007254797,0.00018613602,0.0018533831],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8853952,0.062323622,0.014599451,0.011232729,0.015790906,0.010658057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7391715,0.20068459,0.012426328,0.0080295615,0.027790127,0.011897945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13509387,0.0012105549,0.002505568,0.015868377,0.012470982,0.016513161,0.009198117,0.007007895,0.008751848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17006731,0.0016575609,0.001906484,0.022474384,0.021403376,0.03705329,0.023798844,0.0065875496,0.0012138203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015561351,0.0002811845,0.027599633,0.027593473,0.00013319864,0.0020716654,0.42106166,0.0018590958,0.00092620705,0.11611651,0.011608401,0.39059332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020942663,0.00024615036,0.025099048,0.04757398,0.000073770076,0.0013172943,0.69240606,0.0013222918,0.0005540148,0.11096167,0.12022207,0.00020280245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021649368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027395891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13509387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01973116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051659238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7144532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}