{"meta":{"query_hash":"8ab2cde52c76","filters":{"venue":"Biological Conservation"},"cohort_total":333,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":333,"exported":333,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8ab2cde52c76","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Biological+Conservation"},"results":[{"id":"W1183655724","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.07.036","title":"An ecological network is as good as a major protected area for conserving dragonflies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles; World Anti-Doping Agency; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Ecology; Biodiversity; Species richness; Dragonfly; Marsh; Habitat; Wetland; Threatened species; Biodiversity hotspot; Geography; Ecosystem; Species diversity; Biology; Odonata","score_opus":0.061224493798852316,"score_gpt":0.28694496000585445,"score_spread":0.22572046620700215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1183655724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98842496,0.00003544422,0.001588745,0.004685343,0.00013461629,0.0008802526,0.000010285927,0.00014382084,0.0040965118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98533094,0.000010163406,0.0054804846,0.008081602,0.00006026233,0.00042346912,0.00007496992,0.0000068214495,0.0005312877],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987205,0.00018520447,0.0002657403,0.00039515435,0.00011424314,0.00031914224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913913,0.00037169032,0.0001412594,0.00015478277,0.000070647315,0.00012250693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005912411,0.00016062886,0.00021621792,0.00001592146,0.0003603229,0.000033324475,0.00019871237,0.00027121144,0.00069639867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009606842,0.00011875122,0.000053501655,0.0001816017,0.00032961403,0.00015510923,0.00012771045,0.00011749637,0.0002902173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031514774,0.0002751414,0.9808266,0.0000060615534,0.000034083518,0.000005943198,0.00039694627,0.0004851288,0.0021164024,0.0089511145,0.006208235,0.00037916575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091123127,0.0020458465,0.8865767,0.000007963315,0.000023358489,0.000013817146,0.00034028408,0.017847588,0.00015355943,0.07915977,0.012616791,0.00030310173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000115995426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004994319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094249934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009076149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003651997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7625077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1246858610","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.030","title":"One step ahead of the plow: Using cropland conversion risk to guide Sprague's Pipit conservation in the northern Great Plains","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; U.S. Bureau of Land Management; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Geography; Population; Grassland; Arable land; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Conservation status; Habitat; Agroforestry; Biology; Demography; Agriculture","score_opus":0.0751460014911022,"score_gpt":0.254720581937088,"score_spread":0.17957458044598582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1246858610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931591,0.000013311103,0.0008474773,0.004476335,0.000081264036,0.0004960569,0.0000127924895,0.0000126521445,0.000901007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962103,0.0000148192175,0.00048740828,0.0031326457,0.000029314966,0.000011326516,0.000015193799,0.0000037205673,0.00009530793],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988286,0.00030427534,0.00025564982,0.00019890377,0.00026513846,0.00014746912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944353,0.00012997953,0.0001428879,0.00021715499,0.000023354698,0.000043119686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008229944,0.000095012125,0.000121159814,0.000021051705,0.000118356715,0.000020539514,0.0002549884,0.00007158384,0.00004805857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002730899,0.000051010935,0.00003679207,0.0002891015,0.00013352255,0.00008174286,0.0001438624,0.00008803431,0.000045751163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006586106,0.00004981564,0.99319303,0.0000030872163,0.0000043131217,0.0000011346475,0.0002821065,0.00071743724,0.0009806061,0.000044882763,0.0035635908,0.0010941342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047823106,0.00012296118,0.9674644,0.000022010356,0.000013281325,0.0000011066079,0.00030363194,0.0036633764,0.00015446122,0.00018871177,0.027501559,0.00008627896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00919866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00507626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025728641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012473704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015176061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99739915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1809691465","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.09.016","title":"Conservation of northwest Atlantic harp seals: Past success, future uncertainty?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Subsistence agriculture; Population growth; Geography; Climate change; Fishery; HARP; Productivity; Population model; Population size; Ecology; Environmental science; Agriculture; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.06058935224988361,"score_gpt":0.261887241440243,"score_spread":0.2012978891903594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1809691465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99194074,0.00012476066,0.00006887668,0.004604451,0.00012016229,0.00028173355,0.0000146679085,0.000056324032,0.0027882862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967318,0.000119916935,0.00052064005,0.0022234365,0.00012770794,0.00002509948,0.00017164803,0.000006052322,0.000073705625],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987177,0.00014499022,0.00036096908,0.00029720837,0.00026856066,0.0002105362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992938,0.00011585532,0.00022367488,0.00018619475,0.00008195106,0.00009854563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004546305,0.00015619848,0.000248338,0.000016842487,0.00008448666,0.000016656766,0.00021898786,0.00012467605,0.0006383139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002530922,0.00011357197,0.00005585915,0.00035742437,0.00024328554,0.00016726743,0.00025114897,0.00009510873,0.00015209027],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007097348,0.000059554342,0.9830966,0.000013318993,0.000009671834,0.0000026273747,0.000056160203,0.000029841693,0.0003035409,0.00076407375,0.013498592,0.0020950334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029953866,0.00020791758,0.8751972,0.000010095343,0.000010535546,0.0000027380443,0.00013313218,0.0004544805,0.00004280109,0.0003415759,0.1231654,0.00013460607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024439827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016872901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10966681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011824089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022205546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9820565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963905319","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.014","title":"Assessment of long-term tallgrass prairie restoration in Manitoba, Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Forb; Andropogon; Vegetation (pathology); Restoration ecology; Ecology; Habitat; Grassland; Introduced species; Biodiversity; Geography; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.036942293018735736,"score_gpt":0.27020327368123764,"score_spread":0.2332609806625019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963905319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951468,0.000014348398,0.00050451414,0.0024542164,0.0000494748,0.00014929812,0.0000029595685,0.0000087952385,0.0016695684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829006,0.000012281239,0.00094888627,0.00061295065,0.000012025407,0.000022801563,0.00003684455,0.0000015366944,0.0000626312],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939585,0.00007492057,0.00020730736,0.0001322006,0.00009323901,0.00009649062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970734,0.00009745192,0.00009940129,0.00006400364,0.000014003015,0.000017805796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019446472,0.000057659145,0.000089043075,0.000014053285,0.000051657586,0.0000032064108,0.00006738825,0.0000622281,0.00013154092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007834268,0.000047578127,0.000012029392,0.00010566367,0.000095424795,0.00008265425,0.000044705754,0.0000637719,0.00000729309],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053598483,0.000041231942,0.9959948,0.0000023516332,0.0000027337335,0.0000019432227,0.000010611105,0.0006733531,0.0013010636,0.0008157887,0.00034141517,0.0008093621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014333978,0.000048618556,0.99638075,0.0000036653018,0.0000018614427,6.689533e-7,0.000020245849,0.0028247205,0.0000662158,0.0001357888,0.00031826666,0.00005585007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051602367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9714364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.919834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042594067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9547131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965915251","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.019","title":"Does time or habitat make old-growth forests species rich? Bryophyte richness in boreal Picea mariana forests","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Lichen and fungal ecology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Bryophyte; Ecology; Habitat; Species richness; Taiga; Bog; Temperate rainforest; Old-growth forest; Geography; Biology; Ecosystem; Peat","score_opus":0.036796796586167684,"score_gpt":0.2199622777442623,"score_spread":0.1831654811580946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965915251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919429,0.000036150523,0.0000051901366,0.0058322926,0.00023893893,0.00040895797,0.00006600418,0.00013155575,0.0013380251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936808,0.00009546124,0.00015407804,0.0025091744,0.00037045506,0.0000647334,0.0003172957,0.0000018798095,0.0028061694],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819285,0.00022263534,0.00043182125,0.00049355184,0.00017719815,0.00048196578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865526,0.00082677917,0.00015078149,0.00008469421,0.00016638596,0.00011608768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029675782,0.00024577428,0.0003704022,0.00003336257,0.00026180083,0.00004038031,0.00032654114,0.00036323824,0.0006417487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073146785,0.000070899805,0.000094174866,0.00061070203,0.00027157122,0.00015658152,0.00013216634,0.00019440979,0.00013197378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027481094,0.00014458163,0.98485625,0.0000060083426,0.000009273109,0.000064317865,0.000039428247,5.907579e-7,0.010404777,0.0010353732,0.0020614786,0.0011031356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003438644,0.0006015911,0.9906045,0.000011168352,0.000005406204,0.000020111995,0.00004791446,0.0001283184,0.00034053516,0.0021934698,0.0054435325,0.00025955308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054827274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020945393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02039712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000629264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025766887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966433719","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2003.06.006","title":"Area-sensitive forest birds move extensively among forest patches","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Molson Foundation","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Fragmentation (computing); Ecology; Breed; Habitat fragmentation; Phascolarctos cinereus; Vegetation (pathology); Population; Forest fragmentation; Seasonal breeder; Zoology; Biology; Demography; Medicine","score_opus":0.041951843646504706,"score_gpt":0.2348806348107896,"score_spread":0.1929287911642849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966433719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99608517,0.000007020549,0.0007461918,0.00031938986,0.00009555557,0.0002595221,0.0000069998387,0.00006479171,0.0024153427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972117,0.000008086569,0.0006672049,0.0016004175,0.000014983922,0.00003656426,0.00002896646,0.0000064101946,0.00042565123],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990094,0.00013578006,0.00018639812,0.0003174242,0.00009464622,0.00025638693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949807,0.00016777884,0.000097904995,0.00013280561,0.000026156662,0.00007728603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021507012,0.00013959655,0.00014707158,0.000016568356,0.0001653424,0.000013239,0.00008786625,0.0002305456,0.0007245156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044644956,0.0001020521,0.00005573245,0.00014685438,0.0005229944,0.00014338414,0.000054698896,0.00012550071,0.0003709525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020636904,0.00006251905,0.9951998,6.0913385e-7,0.0000035867365,0.000021319132,0.000038006638,0.00003203985,0.0030576224,0.00042394048,0.0006715427,0.00046835144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019089456,0.00014567892,0.9945741,0.0000039775814,0.000009666358,0.000009135743,0.000130142,0.000103728235,0.0013326415,0.0020366856,0.0013077358,0.00015559942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012768131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011629224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019896915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007370718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010137709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7932937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967199546","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2004.04.003","title":"Canada's boreal forest","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taiga; Boreal; Geography; Forestry; Ecology; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01816602981088519,"score_gpt":0.20461869155276408,"score_spread":0.18645266174187888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967199546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.971174,0.000004162348,0.0010892822,0.00644768,0.000082841,0.000119389864,0.0000021668006,0.00002833051,0.021052118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99301994,0.0000042866063,0.0004638488,0.0062645297,0.000013135584,0.000015382762,0.000029001762,0.0000015081873,0.00018837767],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958766,0.000015097488,0.000080770355,0.00012634449,0.0000650957,0.0001250309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999845,0.000019498266,0.000026313046,0.00007134207,0.0000030414506,0.000034751753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007784827,0.000049552786,0.00004646628,0.000004543694,0.00007218937,0.0000043219457,0.00008405572,0.00004659802,0.00037487262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052548174,0.000036485006,0.000011924284,0.00006595171,0.00008951006,0.0000375373,0.00006563804,0.000039064784,0.00012397942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015926618,0.00003460424,0.87649745,9.874157e-7,0.000003637926,0.000014205486,0.0000066859825,0.0007380731,0.00014714696,0.09855828,0.023224635,0.0007583534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001399858,0.000051603747,0.9050151,7.7989364e-7,0.0000013991074,0.0000011128953,0.000005137122,0.000040447154,0.00005181687,0.019301841,0.07534058,0.000050168615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6659907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9426267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.276636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017229994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032829335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41045925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967352357","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.008","title":"Using forest structure and composition to predict the occurrence of vertebrate species in Douglas-Fir forests of British Columbia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Forest management; Range (aeronautics); Biodiversity; Ecology; Forest structure; Vertebrate; Forest dynamics; Temporal scales; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.029139751189134488,"score_gpt":0.24273195033591372,"score_spread":0.21359219914677924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967352357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99907386,0.00002666173,0.00029068114,0.00024012894,0.000034868815,0.0001928165,0.000059664864,0.0000049853884,0.00007632806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99909323,0.000019376641,0.00058744627,0.00026519684,0.0000053159188,0.0000026305156,0.00001865802,6.6371183e-7,0.000007483738],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995357,0.00005429867,0.00016666681,0.000111405454,0.000056008394,0.0000759278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976134,0.00007967155,0.000080233636,0.00004910329,0.000015631349,0.000014006191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000110401794,0.000038390728,0.00010008467,0.000008847145,0.00006673515,0.000010309686,0.00006435615,0.000054674543,0.000037930782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006264943,0.000036413716,0.000012011901,0.00013657023,0.00024066355,0.00006155425,0.000043507294,0.00004759589,4.7994115e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014589417,0.000019510695,0.99175876,0.0000030699732,0.0000018833844,5.0075255e-7,0.000055164255,0.00082184287,0.006620891,0.00014383049,0.0001919825,0.00036795114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013722842,0.00014780027,0.9893436,0.000018297453,0.0000033489398,0.0000028281097,0.000025670299,0.0064078798,0.000056548324,0.00379417,0.00002267047,0.00003997272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011487312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068870455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067721725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020841017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000040319965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94812024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967976700","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2012.09.019","title":"Avian mortality at communication towers in the United States and Canada: which species, how many, and where?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Warbler; Emberizidae; Bunting; Ecology; Geography; Population; Biology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.05509885846734688,"score_gpt":0.2459111992119399,"score_spread":0.19081234074459302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967976700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99319476,0.00007787204,0.0000052980936,0.0063746604,0.000018559285,0.00014042691,0.000008894056,0.0000067082724,0.0001728472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980278,0.00027393538,0.00005851657,0.0013772708,0.000005173876,0.0000134036245,0.000119385724,0.000001364916,0.00012316718],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994175,0.00020581135,0.00008235482,0.00009760478,0.0000631737,0.00013354913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996542,0.00014142536,0.00004345039,0.00011795634,0.0000059388867,0.000037035603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035753928,0.00006025163,0.00006160816,0.000007848856,0.00014802074,0.000012129067,0.00009139128,0.00007245264,0.00021303938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041570245,0.000037785234,0.0000046073924,0.00010395546,0.00023339431,0.0000935005,0.000101802885,0.000086273714,0.0000031977088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065576305,0.000020930043,0.9976369,0.0000010399705,0.0000012343012,3.7949394e-7,0.00021838926,8.1820735e-7,0.0003054866,0.00007266361,0.001611753,0.00012382239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008825427,0.000021248896,0.9836859,0.0000017757764,0.0000047516396,0.0000031584145,0.0005934466,0.0000460192,0.000027690034,0.00004045219,0.015431125,0.000056174216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23610498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88936204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6532571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107377746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000060056377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7689819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968592013","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.012","title":"Relationships between grizzly bears and human disturbances in a rapidly changing multi-use forest landscape","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Foothills Medical Centre; University of Toronto; University of Calgary","funders":"Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Disturbance (geology); Ecology; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Population; Threatened species; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Forest dynamics; Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.06751044655028116,"score_gpt":0.24868323867417483,"score_spread":0.18117279212389367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968592013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997375,0.000022294615,0.00028340676,0.0017619693,0.00002719214,0.00034713963,0.0000031648042,0.00004449733,0.00013534751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980428,0.0000075574494,0.00096978684,0.0005427392,0.00002742034,0.00009265161,0.00008519151,0.000004206464,0.00022762458],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990612,0.00018772646,0.00022594929,0.00025304742,0.00006681807,0.00020525996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942183,0.00033449626,0.00008731861,0.00009251877,0.000010521952,0.00005327981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039375527,0.00010117379,0.00012459182,0.000053302843,0.00025332175,0.00004132665,0.000082184466,0.00017893399,0.00020397102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030710775,0.000080944876,0.000019736453,0.00024778844,0.00016886034,0.00045704478,0.00008009861,0.00017162906,0.000098858436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004599417,0.000023768325,0.99823105,0.0000016877676,0.0000027230387,7.1540813e-7,0.00015068644,0.0000116283545,0.00028253626,0.00048805558,0.00028135686,0.0005211826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030744015,0.00005799772,0.99661326,0.00000894671,0.0000037652408,8.4574765e-7,0.00011480131,0.00084296137,0.000007368404,0.0014990284,0.00043064784,0.00011295053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082661305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016951448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016178134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042045416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005402989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33008364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971841692","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.015","title":"Agricultural insect pest compromises survival of two endemic Braya (Brassicaceae)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Diamondback moth; PEST analysis; Threatened species; Endangered species; Biodiversity; Ecology; Population; Brassicaceae; Ecosystem; Overwintering; Herbivore; Agronomy; Agroforestry; Habitat; Botany; Larva; Plutella","score_opus":0.12998656827210311,"score_gpt":0.2373345322680315,"score_spread":0.10734796399592839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971841692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963811,0.00013627383,0.0000039250467,0.0011784212,0.00014769808,0.00020280079,0.000061710125,0.00008778457,0.0018002852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989527,0.00014868697,0.0001032332,0.00031303766,0.00014736643,0.000023035645,0.00019496738,3.73769e-7,0.00011663774],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989363,0.00017892105,0.00029441004,0.00026028318,0.00010393903,0.00022616201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988133,0.00081473985,0.0001750149,0.000038236147,0.000105663064,0.00005310019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001751425,0.0001519975,0.00030375813,0.000009321088,0.00031369532,0.000006922743,0.00018570325,0.000145736,0.00017144272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001995232,0.00005110794,0.00009708948,0.00022491485,0.0002994854,0.0000923194,0.0000760602,0.00012613197,0.00002920182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054531647,0.00009400969,0.7940345,0.0000023131897,0.000022041857,0.000004501812,0.000017683846,0.0000010381087,0.20293804,0.0011209206,0.00091844465,0.00079202314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024459098,0.00028275733,0.9907669,0.0000064577594,0.000007185009,0.000023702662,0.000083712075,0.000010486867,0.0028103818,0.00024367482,0.005375094,0.0001450501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020599512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008617648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20012766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016711732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011038728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24127226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972486549","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2004.10.007","title":"Conserving Africa’s rain forests: problems in protected areas and possible solutions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":324,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Sonaca (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Protected area; Outreach; Enforcement; Geography; Business; Population; Environmental resource management; Law enforcement; Government (linguistics); Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Agroforestry; Ecology; Economic growth; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.05638916506935705,"score_gpt":0.2109743928405588,"score_spread":0.15458522777120176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972486549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902986,0.00007958603,0.001105976,0.0055582095,0.000026972144,0.0007179989,0.0000060079688,0.0000829779,0.0021236232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980269,0.000032693242,0.001086733,0.0005567099,0.00001091566,0.00006319726,0.000025149335,0.000003765251,0.00019391559],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989558,0.00009111535,0.00021730973,0.0003234166,0.00013823393,0.00027414967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999645,0.000058918256,0.00008012779,0.00013236549,0.000016593993,0.000066974906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040318535,0.00012438101,0.00012093212,0.00006184153,0.00027789883,0.000044171673,0.00013820035,0.000111824746,0.00016875466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018752011,0.000100141224,0.00002879711,0.0004128414,0.00027357275,0.00013080623,0.00028891483,0.00010524398,0.000051196526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017008537,0.000091592185,0.9953393,0.000010377585,0.0000048890493,0.0000038647354,0.0004294744,0.0005345003,0.0024532126,0.0003511174,0.0001568848,0.00060783315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067293283,0.0000957788,0.9853204,0.000029541576,0.0000054952866,0.0000031936108,0.00024369889,0.0007561383,0.000035255638,0.007927342,0.0047613177,0.0001489243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027534273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038047603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010018865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001866988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018002986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41623768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975700461","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.019","title":"Environmentally biased fragmentation of oak savanna habitat on southeastern Vancouver Island, Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Threatened species; Ecology; Ecological succession; Habitat fragmentation; Fragmentation (computing); Agroforestry; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.02513288030186691,"score_gpt":0.2049469030721789,"score_spread":0.17981402277031197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975700461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960612,0.000009885074,0.00039350434,0.00047335008,0.0001423171,0.00016515925,0.000037322792,0.000012639446,0.0027046322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967958,0.000020569962,0.0002965468,0.002364434,0.000010729966,0.000017805984,0.000048885853,0.0000038046649,0.00044141978],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992016,0.00008124879,0.00022213656,0.00019861125,0.00016527936,0.0001311273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956125,0.00017127398,0.00013147679,0.00009376589,0.0000082865545,0.00003396685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009461531,0.00010159381,0.00012573598,0.000014870333,0.00016033558,0.0000017590719,0.00008050413,0.00007004363,0.00059883646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007070072,0.00007956464,0.000030211797,0.00007285591,0.00024222839,0.00005763363,0.000044182423,0.00006520959,0.00007335166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006585071,0.00006999353,0.9897304,0.0000022611703,0.000010726974,0.000004445487,0.00010727534,0.0007582915,0.002954691,0.00006562527,0.006041068,0.0001893821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036466558,0.00020004512,0.9960126,0.0000039963857,0.0000045794477,0.0000013903303,0.00014206715,0.0010323804,0.00037749534,0.00022039351,0.0015398226,0.000100526995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019743385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56839335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54864997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010021809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021122494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9867842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977543966","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.020","title":"Looking beyond the mortality of bycatch: sublethal effects of incidental capture on marine animals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Bycatch; Reproduction; Biology; Population; Organism; Reproductive success; Fishing; Ecology; Marine ecosystem; Fishery; Ecosystem; Medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.026748286203165154,"score_gpt":0.2618757938951587,"score_spread":0.23512750769199353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977543966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9616204,0.0000030879755,0.000068194204,0.00040222783,0.000032651235,0.00019580622,0.00000241591,0.000008711839,0.0376665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99925876,0.000008842079,0.00008255153,0.0004989708,0.000020170237,0.000011452918,0.000016162594,0.0000027445838,0.00010034541],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911207,0.00019090298,0.00018554142,0.00015685987,0.00022945632,0.00012517358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926734,0.00040146682,0.00010397145,0.00018176393,0.00001538681,0.00003009068],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051609956,0.000074627365,0.000134005,0.000010841745,0.000049342514,0.00000722297,0.00019349036,0.00008282484,0.0011013147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046524708,0.000042583997,0.000043318498,0.00013624968,0.00032535972,0.00003960551,0.00027276616,0.00011185858,0.000010796845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005179676,0.000045032088,0.9629733,0.000016490761,0.000005916623,9.753259e-7,0.00003727398,0.0000028348645,0.0290132,0.001717501,0.0002083454,0.0059273583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015410688,0.0003177792,0.9869678,0.0000029974356,0.0000042795477,8.337106e-7,0.000019355099,0.0002650418,0.008508117,0.0016158911,0.0020922988,0.000051503725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025195647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022310605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037638355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024166724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004719867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978170386","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2004.04.021","title":"Declines in abundance and distribution of the ivory gull (Pagophila eburnea) in Arctic Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Nunavut Wildlife Management Board","keywords":"Seabird; Circumpolar star; Arctic; Geography; Population; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Population decline; Charadriiformes; Biology; Demography; Oceanography; Predation","score_opus":0.016973155637745416,"score_gpt":0.1923420747385106,"score_spread":0.17536891910076519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978170386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964062,0.00009758086,0.00005836432,0.0032017573,0.00007434215,0.00009234618,0.000032847216,0.0000030865922,0.00003347779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99914026,0.00007133365,0.00008859441,0.00060281623,0.000012208795,6.9814706e-7,0.00007811671,5.06667e-7,0.000005434713],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994817,0.000051115094,0.00017584371,0.000107892716,0.00007489673,0.00010860085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996957,0.00014193868,0.00006110357,0.000058484944,0.000022507973,0.000020273052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001597937,0.00005418074,0.00008725549,0.000010674973,0.000042675336,0.0000048957004,0.000075128344,0.00004896241,0.000017230856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024789613,0.00003309797,0.000012119203,0.00016505332,0.00012247126,0.00004867537,0.000009698158,0.000084644125,5.8562847e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019931045,0.000007461491,0.99776316,0.000009295038,8.6123305e-7,0.0000027816368,0.000022070013,0.0006301496,0.000026257854,0.000500551,0.0000042318193,0.001013269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020077887,0.000030352963,0.9932368,0.000036659396,0.0000013682717,0.0000034178645,0.00008160603,0.0015173192,0.000014275938,0.0046226345,0.00020831617,0.000046511825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6432805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8938408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2505603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022797778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013181745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35909495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979286076","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.008","title":"From hotspots to site protection: Identifying Marine Protected Areas for seabirds around the globe","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Killam Trusts; Northern Ireland Environment Agency","keywords":"Marine protected area; Marine conservation; Seabird; Context (archaeology); Marine spatial planning; Environmental resource management; Sustainability; Citizen science; Key (lock); Marine ecosystem; Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Environmental planning; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Predation","score_opus":0.10414570178690043,"score_gpt":0.28742640446229584,"score_spread":0.18328070267539542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979286076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883296,0.00004074532,0.003737495,0.0048773335,0.00014104055,0.0019597237,0.000015908363,0.00008887645,0.00080926414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929553,0.000009043256,0.0031271514,0.0023018096,0.00040419883,0.0008911694,0.000031309854,0.000008382172,0.0002716253],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989538,0.00010675637,0.0002072366,0.00027293092,0.0001677616,0.0002914679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948364,0.00012656131,0.00009429881,0.00018693758,0.000026926631,0.00008162264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046157825,0.00013836597,0.00013872063,0.000010132811,0.00030813582,0.000044474542,0.00017570007,0.0000832257,0.0010064024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051550247,0.000084951935,0.00005809098,0.00027017712,0.00007759268,0.00016847394,0.000506241,0.00009353879,0.00037224268],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018433605,0.00007693088,0.9486815,0.000011852119,0.000020834299,4.39243e-7,0.0001718694,0.000006423293,0.017306717,0.00019461458,0.0037485594,0.029595964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013929346,0.00011158827,0.88349074,0.0000066488155,0.000010194115,0.0000015401919,0.000042762935,0.00019279456,0.00035686328,0.0011647473,0.1143601,0.00012272527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008110973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011438117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11061154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014887156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000042377724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980665902","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.01.022","title":"Using functional traits to assess the role of hedgerow corridors as environmental filters for forest herbs","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Ecology; Seed dispersal; Habitat; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Phenology; Population","score_opus":0.1758475469761459,"score_gpt":0.23748039195782386,"score_spread":0.06163284498167795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980665902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985537,0.000096592594,0.000055209966,0.00070221815,0.000030299863,0.00024216321,0.00012444697,0.000015880434,0.00017951195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99904084,0.000005066977,0.00015137286,0.00043919333,0.00016395892,0.000025765023,0.000116705785,4.2745316e-7,0.000056650973],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946266,0.00003217726,0.00014389755,0.00014421322,0.000084529,0.00013253935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957305,0.00030906836,0.0000651866,0.000010103933,0.000020029749,0.000022579934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001115019,0.00008044475,0.000101220074,0.0000041775897,0.00020517227,0.000015607942,0.000085183994,0.000056466415,0.000060683018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004438848,0.000025775844,0.00006522427,0.00007505505,0.00006840503,0.00003588109,0.00003179947,0.000029985022,0.0000060759808],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085762236,0.000035065586,0.26923984,7.505138e-7,0.0000045199713,1.4368554e-7,0.0000047108674,0.000030586445,0.72743124,0.0009050057,0.00034721984,0.0019151703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006337187,0.0002654677,0.97754866,0.0000046980413,0.0000056696213,0.000001974868,0.00020570567,0.0002999088,0.004209824,0.0017898991,0.015529359,0.000075441065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022471257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005263491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7232214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015126726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000031137515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.157804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982756397","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.047","title":"Hierarchical tree classifiers to find suitable sites for sandplain grasslands and heathlands on Martha’s Vineyard Island, Massachusetts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Grassland; Habitat; Vineyard; Geography; Ecology; Land use; Endangered species; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.025935885180560246,"score_gpt":0.24513092766137717,"score_spread":0.21919504248081692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982756397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843961,0.000017873459,0.0022783712,0.0069737234,0.0000469391,0.00033848904,0.000054422122,0.00003234263,0.005861752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944443,0.000011578978,0.0014584116,0.0019880666,0.000045206387,0.00010015499,0.0001969603,0.00000486793,0.0017504345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911517,0.00007060398,0.0001823718,0.0003086547,0.00008381301,0.0002393891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992379,0.0005650959,0.000044830922,0.00008248924,0.00001171264,0.00005795429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030535238,0.00012665485,0.00015936652,0.000034874633,0.00026249455,0.00002307576,0.000070585374,0.00015627682,0.00013158903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020729078,0.00009193107,0.000036814836,0.00010718062,0.0001449001,0.000052383257,0.00005790369,0.000090761,0.00003684127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020667569,0.000055233748,0.96997654,0.0000036000456,0.0000072756416,0.0000013483233,0.00003404771,0.000121798505,0.0035706712,0.0019588775,0.02330993,0.00075398514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058774964,0.00060762884,0.977873,0.0000043138657,0.0000072007188,0.0000013824837,0.000023483182,0.0036813852,0.00013713482,0.0063759196,0.010561019,0.00013976777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005922109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003425152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01274891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004643279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000506393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37488404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983101969","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.11.006","title":"The quest for cryptic creatures: Impacts of species-focused recreational diving on corals","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Aquatic life and conservation","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"British Ecological Society","keywords":"Seahorse; Coral reef; Biology; Reef; Coral; Ecology; Fishery; Coral reef fish","score_opus":0.08940145674672119,"score_gpt":0.27725707491376184,"score_spread":0.18785561816704066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983101969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99295855,0.00009058154,0.00037881854,0.00500373,0.00009880702,0.0004521415,0.00002894323,0.000040376523,0.0009480554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99735,0.000053408396,0.00042099747,0.0013977432,0.00027074412,0.000027694048,0.00019786641,8.390912e-7,0.0002807109],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889,0.00008973288,0.00040807278,0.00019745453,0.000183806,0.00023096915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99437547,0.005024654,0.0002638754,0.00006351212,0.00021591556,0.00005658837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012480699,0.000116191586,0.00015107672,0.000010774737,0.0003412361,0.000043468084,0.00017492104,0.00013995309,0.00007515847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021198506,0.00003610619,0.000094756855,0.0002209411,0.000120297,0.00006975762,0.00002202914,0.00007173922,0.000008669904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013668863,0.00020392903,0.36474344,0.000013042,0.000044269636,0.0000012086531,0.00007557955,0.000002020384,0.41084734,0.1414062,0.0050099837,0.07628609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018877356,0.0007591506,0.95499396,0.000036554164,0.0000079952515,6.0441096e-7,0.00013221947,0.00009271146,0.00634706,0.0069386736,0.030396601,0.00010569906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014659324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051243004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5902505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035338817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018598874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2624547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983836974","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.08.007","title":"Genetic and morphological divergence in island and mainland birds: Informing conservation priorities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Subspecies; Mainland; Genetic divergence; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Ecology; Passerine; Mainland China; Zoology; Genetic structure; Evolutionary biology; Genetic variation; Genetic diversity; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.04465415464976404,"score_gpt":0.23090585440772715,"score_spread":0.1862516997579631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983836974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99848855,0.00035355406,0.0005762776,0.00012621887,0.000049653856,0.00015210838,0.000014566079,0.0000100096995,0.00022908271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958899,0.0005131148,0.002704697,0.000755537,0.000028413531,0.0000067484734,0.000043074964,0.0000029234473,0.00005559223],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993515,0.000060802493,0.00017378826,0.00023004774,0.000054794942,0.00012909046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999745,0.000020874691,0.000060913266,0.000083670006,0.00004399256,0.00004553685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012615067,0.00010408527,0.000105119245,0.00003733984,0.000075492266,0.00001681621,0.00006073158,0.00020277656,0.000043725788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000120404075,0.000085353735,0.000016154761,0.000065172215,0.00016265667,0.000008851749,0.00010543182,0.000059260117,0.0000017503747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008526772,0.000008269909,0.9834893,0.000008314908,0.000005278238,0.0000051082993,0.0001331751,0.0000017123725,0.01460646,0.0003182201,0.00009969573,0.0012392465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037897058,0.00019353273,0.99418956,0.000007000249,0.0000051004968,0.000034078093,0.00013440454,0.00009960744,0.0010118885,0.0011857643,0.0026347127,0.00012537045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020262541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022322165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0135945715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000043900873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015691945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34806246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986086359","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2003.06.001","title":"Effects of marine reef National Parks on fishery CPUE in coastal Kenya","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Spillover effect; Fishery; Reef; Parrotfish; Fringing reef; Marine reserve; National park; Marine protected area; Coral reef; Geography; Seagrass; Coral reef fish; Ecology; Fishing; Oceanography; Biology; Ecosystem; Habitat; Geology","score_opus":0.02249853411309265,"score_gpt":0.2209551502241653,"score_spread":0.19845661611107263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986086359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753084,0.000007256749,0.000022029868,0.0002811405,0.000074232514,0.00017468433,0.0000026701828,0.000012791204,0.024116756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991046,0.000017293733,0.00012299026,0.0003913051,0.000009328863,0.00002975067,0.000013733393,0.0000018906312,0.00030909575],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935395,0.00009467567,0.00016824245,0.0001558672,0.00012508314,0.00010216198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995986,0.00026505673,0.000059190166,0.000045540433,0.000011715984,0.000019895124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022228829,0.00007227731,0.000115332674,0.00001800072,0.00003208524,0.0000035660207,0.000050154722,0.000055036955,0.00033363295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055588875,0.0000517046,0.00002612083,0.00012642851,0.00006366171,0.000042483538,0.000091252165,0.000057423742,0.000040017603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004034593,0.000117333504,0.9885161,0.000010896898,0.0000032989801,0.0000028949771,0.000011170458,0.0000064013007,0.0054942807,0.002200212,0.0019180197,0.0016790644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027601913,0.00016791493,0.98703414,0.0000096284375,0.0000012051215,0.0000010231985,0.0000072600424,0.00007668047,0.00087041536,0.0030607248,0.00842976,0.000065205204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027998947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005402693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02380766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048878308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000060118164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36530468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986911666","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(03)00290-8","title":"Recovery of native plant communities after eradication of rabbits from the subantarctic Kerguelen Islands, and influence of climate change","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Polar Knowledge Canada","keywords":"Introduced species; Biota; Native plant; Ecology; Species richness; Invasive species; Herbivore; Archipelago; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Alien; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Population","score_opus":0.046773605763283946,"score_gpt":0.24015427823102653,"score_spread":0.1933806724677426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986911666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992835,0.00019306796,0.000004305197,0.00014577188,0.000012036899,0.00013276927,0.00009706177,0.0000030985182,0.00012839856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830717,0.0012693418,0.000108399574,0.00026271841,0.000002431774,0.00002819572,0.000018970732,0.0000011538997,0.0000016418941],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994889,0.00016251474,0.00016422497,0.00006870909,0.00005257139,0.00006310986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993438,0.00040802336,0.00015199588,0.00006917858,0.000019017625,0.00000798635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020064395,0.00005247106,0.000118504715,0.000007915443,0.000055598022,0.000001423158,0.00006112043,0.00005623117,0.000108412096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010005289,0.000031405365,0.000016449441,0.000058144997,0.000505545,0.00007763505,0.000058868347,0.000049565013,0.0000015816481],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013800454,0.00003224941,0.9954073,0.0000056185445,0.00000684905,1.6051537e-7,0.0009757911,0.0000012945138,0.0029740531,0.0002294216,0.000008708259,0.00022058113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011018439,0.00024308122,0.99710834,0.000023304512,0.000013461748,5.9842563e-7,0.0005427859,0.000011644558,0.001319871,0.0005294831,0.000060512997,0.00003672048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013199014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011232449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0017010836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010753382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000029489822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19953048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987232806","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.10.032","title":"The trade in sharks and their products in the United Arab Emirates","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"United Arab Emirates University; Utah Agricultural Experiment Station","keywords":"Overexploitation; IUCN Red List; Geography; Fishery; DNA barcoding; Wildlife trade; Business; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.03796479434449743,"score_gpt":0.22921665587149093,"score_spread":0.1912518615269935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987232806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813113,0.000033807355,0.000012687627,0.017576193,0.000031071766,0.00016221411,5.2545585e-7,0.000008779877,0.00086337724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959591,0.000047735408,0.000027184962,0.0038792973,0.000016589553,0.000026827995,0.000018071427,0.0000011242206,0.000024075041],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991488,0.00043056623,0.00011358104,0.00015091166,0.000023903282,0.00013226036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993553,0.0005057898,0.000027621567,0.00009971803,0.0000021997148,0.000009332939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090040936,0.000062309344,0.000063203646,0.000012848465,0.00009005298,0.000009405233,0.00014448751,0.00009228879,0.000024237834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047222723,0.000025259642,0.0000073667757,0.00019632395,0.00033175663,0.00002868435,0.000059028214,0.00012394892,0.000012968352],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047166533,0.00002963573,0.98177075,0.0000010081995,0.0000011302652,5.8683503e-7,0.00022697046,0.000008050553,0.0072573917,0.005002825,0.00056624395,0.005088234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012222335,0.00009032235,0.9546861,0.0000013052087,5.205759e-7,0.00000375015,0.000088610024,0.00079450494,0.00017941356,0.0041514025,0.03984006,0.000041768555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030619296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008758666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039273817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011654283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000025785496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12223711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988770041","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.03.009","title":"Evaluation of IUCN spatial distribution metrics for a migratory species, Fraser River Sockeye salmon","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Endangered species; Threatened species; Conservation status; Critically endangered; Geography; Ecology; Oncorhynchus; Fishery; Wildlife; Data deficient; Biology; Habitat; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.061523989611498235,"score_gpt":0.26181331646771977,"score_spread":0.20028932685622153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988770041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.939734,0.000022513854,0.058343507,0.0007020784,0.00017482441,0.00053232984,0.000052938904,0.00003242884,0.00040536752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976181,0.00000788769,0.00081638654,0.00073628273,0.000085539585,0.000108048545,0.0005713329,0.000004710273,0.00005172911],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984033,0.00044395772,0.00032559823,0.0002806304,0.0003755856,0.00017089453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886465,0.0004997625,0.00024746143,0.00015723465,0.00018779005,0.00004311429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026839222,0.00011576229,0.00017361017,0.000028851917,0.00014311732,0.000009209587,0.0001270024,0.00022995166,0.0005341201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032973043,0.00009722388,0.000078252255,0.00027060008,0.00032625577,0.00014210434,0.0000497463,0.00007335694,0.000051630923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079184065,0.0001006163,0.9668554,0.0000047869103,0.000013183721,6.5648074e-8,0.000027945827,0.000113700225,0.0026423475,0.0014492729,0.008280045,0.020433437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067651516,0.00024926336,0.9382714,0.0000044376147,0.00006729414,2.2786087e-7,0.00001704219,0.033948947,0.001215615,0.006894116,0.018536778,0.00011836913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025801372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003478471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05788407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021266658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003590726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.584824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989343681","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.014","title":"Impact of landscape composition and configuration on forest specialist and generalist bird species in the fragmented Lacandona rainforest, Mexico","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":249,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología","keywords":"Generalist and specialist species; Biodiversity; Deforestation (computer science); Rainforest; Geography; Secondary forest; Forest ecology; Ecology; Agroforestry; Old-growth forest; Intact forest landscape; Forest management; Forest restoration; Ecosystem; Habitat; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.049658566433444365,"score_gpt":0.2739731314441479,"score_spread":0.22431456501070357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989343681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960372,0.000027612936,0.00014323312,0.0013898956,0.00002264056,0.00018768523,0.000009347317,0.000010329113,0.0021720664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992384,0.00005324495,0.0000696709,0.0005218663,0.000018005512,0.000012492819,0.00006469939,0.0000018380742,0.000019836247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994679,0.00011212309,0.00015289651,0.00011132121,0.000079626465,0.00007614789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996632,0.0001648977,0.00008179039,0.000050596416,0.000016001535,0.000023521428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002881333,0.00007066384,0.00010110404,0.000023800569,0.00007499044,0.000015655847,0.00004350505,0.000059170823,0.000036671318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009858613,0.000041071344,0.000016356244,0.000094364994,0.00032969716,0.00007281617,0.000026286669,0.0000530353,0.0000048133743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111261135,0.000037248043,0.99011344,0.0000013790215,0.0000050145427,8.477805e-7,0.0002811532,0.00045849063,0.0011433739,0.0070718606,0.0006950475,0.000080861864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051052246,0.00033220628,0.9935428,0.0000041118215,0.0000034038328,0.000002524718,0.00012528046,0.0037457673,0.000025148935,0.0015269993,0.00013018612,0.00005104946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038120593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021078845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055448613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037063433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005958896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16748407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990646975","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.019","title":"Dynamics of harvested populations of the tropical understory herb Aechmea magdalenae in old-growth versus secondary forests","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Understory; Secondary forest; Old-growth forest; Population; Rainforest; Biology; Ecology; Geography; Agroforestry; Canopy; Demography","score_opus":0.04515023543095277,"score_gpt":0.2546630573733203,"score_spread":0.20951282194236753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990646975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99552494,0.000018692786,0.00076507987,0.0025701073,0.00013210501,0.0001725123,0.000010996477,0.000011604516,0.0007939795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988841,0.000011231523,0.0008127471,0.00020620027,0.0000042990864,0.000010861135,0.00002226177,0.0000025812603,0.00004573941],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999316,0.0000895185,0.0002627023,0.00014008892,0.00008561275,0.000106091386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958676,0.00013060016,0.00013543491,0.00010569443,0.000024016086,0.000017465965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010415718,0.00007234456,0.00012553053,0.000024091985,0.00007551637,0.0000021379378,0.00012891412,0.00012356191,0.00007250336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031694965,0.000050791725,0.00004863909,0.00022354364,0.00048153833,0.000080915444,0.00008758506,0.000116175856,0.0000058078335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052795036,0.00007326767,0.9440782,0.000006251754,0.0000055202495,4.2358292e-7,0.000074657546,0.0011207776,0.0004197118,0.054086413,0.000018187018,0.000063793115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071423344,0.00012224667,0.9693627,0.000008911075,0.0000057125085,5.632865e-7,0.000104115,0.0011936562,0.000093269424,0.028333321,0.0000063230655,0.000054961478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004605881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05058393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050123338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020472392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022838654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9667404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990989482","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.017","title":"Robust predictions of species distribution: Spatial habitat models for a brood parasite","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cowbird; Brood parasite; Context (archaeology); Habitat; Ecology; Population; Geography; Host (biology); Parasitism; Biology","score_opus":0.0689476746857939,"score_gpt":0.24341572770161335,"score_spread":0.17446805301581947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990989482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5815057,0.000008126367,0.4164973,0.00087008794,0.000091330396,0.00025342446,0.00007107516,0.00003345208,0.0006694633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99599427,0.000008379673,0.0027493427,0.000516926,0.000071678944,0.00004678544,0.0004272888,0.000003471907,0.00018183126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912393,0.000043077463,0.0003152309,0.00021844744,0.00010615971,0.0001931583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993238,0.00032811123,0.00014000037,0.00011548503,0.000045426827,0.000047193393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048174168,0.00009365327,0.00012914038,0.000016173717,0.0001707138,0.0000074617883,0.00010306282,0.00016979114,0.00022424207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002522508,0.00007852112,0.00006553521,0.00017043404,0.00027630938,0.00017286467,0.000043611817,0.00006538639,0.000018592358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018135374,0.000100540834,0.98466796,0.000004146405,0.000009511292,5.029356e-7,0.00003058411,0.002151913,0.0015393271,0.006370281,0.004270347,0.00067356596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032351716,0.0002438923,0.97418326,0.0000049228493,0.000012550289,0.000002160233,0.000035114623,0.01596625,0.00045144212,0.0048879674,0.00379813,0.000090775065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014154831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009203281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41448855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013002248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32019985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991595463","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2012.02.016","title":"The role of seabirds in Marine Protected Area identification, delineation, and monitoring: Introduction and synthesis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Seabird; Marine protected area; Identification (biology); Geography; Foraging; Conservation status; Population; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.0310077914747789,"score_gpt":0.23561171947051848,"score_spread":0.2046039279957396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991595463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99820894,0.00028241237,0.000039278166,0.0010678069,0.000027540205,0.0002247268,8.063567e-7,0.00001263381,0.00013583562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988708,0.0005002066,0.0004443638,0.000017769515,0.000054560813,0.00007965933,0.0000029349985,0.0000021825049,0.000027543094],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994152,0.00008165762,0.00020190448,0.00012583894,0.00007574767,0.00009962825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964535,0.00013714722,0.0000899458,0.00008032704,0.000023913772,0.000023288017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052488624,0.000057833196,0.000075949225,0.000010934332,0.00010041827,0.000011369893,0.000047541384,0.000040255036,0.000055045075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089817785,0.000037269965,0.000008084943,0.00015444437,0.00013312894,0.00011383129,0.00014785363,0.000042517077,0.0000038652984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018700042,0.000024301868,0.9067264,0.0000034266102,0.0000025803208,1.6501687e-8,0.000032993357,8.4290497e-7,0.014329924,0.00025155253,0.000027406339,0.07858185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048965165,0.000020813777,0.9850661,0.000002715472,0.000004113983,0.0000011099435,0.00010242629,0.00018558143,0.0046297484,0.00045890067,0.009436233,0.000043261167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075764913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001880259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07853859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035091012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000017694575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1519825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992099232","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.01.023","title":"Patterns of species change in anthropogenically disturbed forests of Madagascar","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":234,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Generalist and specialist species; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Biodiversity; Endemism; Habitat; Grassland; Geography; Phylogenetic diversity; Vegetation (pathology); Taxonomic rank; Biology; Species diversity; Phylogenetic tree; Taxon","score_opus":0.044707310514981766,"score_gpt":0.2918771657305974,"score_spread":0.24716985521561563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992099232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994035,0.000033520177,0.000049742288,0.00016976365,0.00011729696,0.0001393336,0.00003834406,0.0000036754593,0.000044852637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993396,0.000049821883,0.00014235494,0.00013396332,0.00007375346,0.000018810464,0.00020099184,0.000002889232,0.00003781058],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949086,0.000036097204,0.00020297497,0.00013182551,0.000037240345,0.000101007994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970406,0.000018429102,0.00008978318,0.00011657947,0.00005341329,0.000017702758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013172274,0.000067310975,0.00012591186,0.000022978718,0.000018951358,0.0000016408494,0.00009257288,0.0002215083,0.00009489492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008523198,0.000050641633,0.0000539526,0.00004427581,0.00012063161,0.0000030130188,0.000045433448,0.000075237316,9.20244e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048377584,0.00006263118,0.5147359,0.0000042518964,0.0000022802096,6.584362e-7,0.0000096440945,6.166971e-8,0.48453182,0.00026992636,0.000009663873,0.00032477084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019833534,0.0002554813,0.7854946,0.0000040137893,0.0000031936531,0.0000015815274,0.000012144792,0.0000059297563,0.2135286,0.00004162128,0.00040407068,0.00005039649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008799332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026070704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27100322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000019020158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013827295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20651059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993327743","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.004","title":"The role of social aggregations and protected areas in killer whale conservation: The mixed blessing of critical habitat","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Whale; Critical habitat; Endangered species; Habitat; Population; Fishery; Geography; Home range; Range (aeronautics); Context (archaeology); Ecology; Marine protected area; Marine reserve; Nature reserve; Population size; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.03273963387034539,"score_gpt":0.2621907492675565,"score_spread":0.22945111539721108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993327743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793946,0.0003100702,0.000028623335,0.018480768,0.00001593544,0.00029374522,0.0000021423764,0.0000101013675,0.0014639904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900174,0.00005161269,0.00032456298,0.000570699,0.0000114645345,0.000017687049,0.0000037821394,0.0000017557131,0.000016693511],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913096,0.00020139478,0.00028295082,0.00013355527,0.00012839217,0.00012271598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991489,0.00058905577,0.00012022517,0.00008309931,0.00004245278,0.0000162654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000411341,0.00007346264,0.00013495967,0.000009472768,0.000262833,0.000015309724,0.00011245322,0.0000625293,0.00006221998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010914517,0.000040548035,0.000030526266,0.00025881547,0.00068042905,0.000073913834,0.00009684116,0.00008348003,0.0000024625858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112492125,0.00016357904,0.90232736,0.000014414572,0.000009619491,7.2790465e-7,0.00042977423,0.0000046879404,0.016453527,0.031986147,0.00077217526,0.047725476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001268844,0.0000960784,0.98399776,0.0000134023685,0.0000058313726,0.0000010966478,0.00031842806,0.0005632646,0.0005544059,0.009882216,0.004388904,0.000051711504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005184099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013037486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081670396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028013865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009610799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2507069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993383230","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.02.010","title":"Maps, models, and marine vulnerability: Assessing the community distribution of seabirds at-sea","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Mount Allison University","funders":"Environmental Studies Research Funds; Mount Allison University","keywords":"Bathymetry; Environmental science; Seabird; Species distribution; Sampling (signal processing); Vulnerability (computing); Geography; Submarine pipeline; Aerial survey; Physical geography; Habitat; Fishery; Ecology; Oceanography; Cartography; Computer science; Biology; Predation","score_opus":0.07307902107966942,"score_gpt":0.2876948535988534,"score_spread":0.21461583251918398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993383230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99627066,0.000004009441,0.0019091297,0.0010433914,0.000022955637,0.00010877482,0.000014783022,0.00001962947,0.0006066794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99915874,0.000005492554,0.00023577458,0.00035122878,0.0000068980603,0.000009990721,0.00018942247,0.0000016275995,0.000040835886],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903274,0.00056549406,0.00014037415,0.000105498606,0.00006137876,0.00009449404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940777,0.0003253068,0.00007443751,0.00015570545,0.0000113514925,0.000025455121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009284912,0.000060406237,0.00008925515,0.0000032923401,0.00035528344,0.000008630859,0.00010111168,0.000099475605,0.00018143967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022457568,0.00003588927,0.000018783669,0.000066834546,0.0005441186,0.000100500394,0.0002923263,0.0001489759,0.00000904121],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010940081,0.000053143893,0.99111855,0.0000024566189,0.0000012051612,7.9689684e-8,0.000020226054,0.000020857784,0.0018351167,0.00038346386,0.00018894745,0.0063650417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010255063,0.00008263834,0.98866296,0.0000017469349,0.0000069469716,0.0000021810085,0.00002890979,0.00230551,0.00032651247,0.007618661,0.0008136546,0.0000477409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039143246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003592095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007235197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000599831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000031559719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2732589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994505276","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.020","title":"Natural regeneration of forest vegetation on legacy seismic lines in boreal habitats in Alberta’s oil sands region","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Alberta Innovates; Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures; University of Alberta; University of New Brunswick","keywords":"Regeneration (biology); Forest regeneration; Disturbance (geology); Taiga; Habitat; Logging; Terrain; Fragmentation (computing); Environmental science; Boreal; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Geography; Physical geography; Geology; Agroforestry; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.046907862987178424,"score_gpt":0.2622912435023202,"score_spread":0.21538338051514178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994505276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992635,0.000026180473,0.00024391351,0.0032912327,0.000067654604,0.000110661545,4.2784526e-7,0.000015233409,0.0036096654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861354,0.000015766069,0.000626481,0.00041668108,0.000032316748,0.000008027565,0.00012011044,0.0000042501756,0.00016281575],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914485,0.00011598581,0.00027808858,0.00022029481,0.00012393198,0.000116823554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958456,0.000117245174,0.000110086025,0.0001293297,0.000023598623,0.00003518528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023751993,0.00008890642,0.0001176284,0.000057536192,0.000027880038,0.000014301593,0.000071291666,0.00010743626,0.0000018875363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003121396,0.000070065995,0.000024103867,0.00030983036,0.000093191695,0.00015940737,0.000021056121,0.00009820141,0.000022231967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024244908,0.00021078439,0.91917986,0.000009991723,0.0000027290275,0.000003792724,0.000646002,0.020565525,0.01383386,0.0023025207,0.0012173312,0.041785132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004655852,0.00012913365,0.9255125,0.00003058359,0.0000017899268,0.0000029852752,0.00004711671,0.06933534,0.0013971688,0.0019755387,0.001006542,0.0000957203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075910906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013922666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04876982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001266349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018406994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995124281","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.064","title":"Estimating land and conservation management costs: The first step in designing a stewardship program for the Northern Territory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; Australian Research Council; Nature Conservancy","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Land management; Incentive; Conservation Reserve Program; Business; Environmental resource management; Land use; Opportunity cost; Environmental planning; Geography; Agriculture; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.14827319552701307,"score_gpt":0.25150926359071585,"score_spread":0.10323606806370278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995124281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98192245,0.0008617785,0.0116915805,0.0037857264,0.00016743352,0.0012017284,0.000013087924,0.000024312381,0.0003318879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917096,0.0000624795,0.00635515,0.0011007789,0.00009203467,0.0006079796,0.000037687383,0.000006975582,0.000027326752],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992934,0.000027955153,0.0003199974,0.00016662544,0.000019017538,0.00017301485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993382,0.000341287,0.00018363098,0.00010887338,0.000006807735,0.00002119414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012418943,0.00008725642,0.00011780408,0.000028843237,0.00020617938,0.000049517697,0.00008848977,0.0000647908,0.000014564231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000093064715,0.0000588943,0.00002930618,0.00005392865,0.00008091459,0.00015270755,0.00004000535,0.00006410177,0.000019325827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001534209,0.00003907329,0.9846358,0.000013671157,0.000014473384,6.173353e-8,0.00012009762,0.000059713046,0.0000022070085,0.0064686798,0.00013398565,0.008496907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040084886,0.000052961364,0.9464127,0.0000132873265,0.0000060751527,8.143051e-7,0.00021497157,0.040266953,0.0000028911886,0.0013049222,0.0112362355,0.00008736824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036243934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036425792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04020724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013350771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002873892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.240164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995851570","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.02.009","title":"Ecosystem services expand the biodiversity conservation toolbox – A response to Deliège and Neuteleers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; McGill University; Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Safeguarding; Ecosystem; Incentive; Land use; Agriculture; Environmental resource management; Geography; Natural resource economics; Agroforestry; Ecology; Environmental science; Habitat; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.017023046829292454,"score_gpt":0.19199075682185224,"score_spread":0.17496770999255978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995851570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96844006,0.000015251814,0.00052457914,0.029876748,0.00010576547,0.0005240915,0.000022799326,0.00008563798,0.00040505512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824585,0.000015639045,0.00033904857,0.016933978,0.000022384944,0.000018391154,0.00003207109,0.0000031635195,0.00017688048],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984464,0.00045118452,0.0002236304,0.0004144612,0.0002327335,0.00023159022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990302,0.00042764118,0.00011979617,0.00026521113,0.000039901763,0.000117271215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012374925,0.00016791189,0.00015258812,0.0000484887,0.00063812145,0.000108499626,0.00030657803,0.0001125671,0.00018064684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000184092,0.00011308258,0.000045411845,0.00031269927,0.00017586356,0.00015836663,0.0003672878,0.00008099182,0.0003049017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004049618,0.00002741447,0.98958504,0.000012919616,0.000011954733,0.0000014791477,0.00060962426,0.00006664033,0.0037634855,0.000059293463,0.0032562912,0.0022008813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029572003,0.00015501113,0.77180225,0.000008916002,0.000015141406,0.0000021118033,0.0006195198,0.001342074,0.000083522995,0.000078833684,0.22545566,0.00014123117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013731173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001212274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22219937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009013344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000073535994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49079785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996354819","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.03.008","title":"Food limitation at species range limits: Impacts of food availability on the density and colony expansion of prairie dog populations at their northern periphery","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Prairie dog; Range (aeronautics); Population density; Ecology; Biology; Population; Vegetation (pathology); Cynomys ludovicianus; Home range; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.08430423183855335,"score_gpt":0.2750657777001205,"score_spread":0.19076154586156713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996354819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99738634,0.00016797172,0.000026020225,0.0015482268,0.000029727495,0.0006658699,0.00008097926,0.000010173988,0.00008470928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991361,0.00006269172,0.000121811645,0.00019296781,0.000031127678,0.00003998083,0.0003377119,0.000007747878,0.00006986616],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881345,0.0003008775,0.00029469267,0.00028246237,0.00013686344,0.00017166146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876076,0.0002947525,0.0002051613,0.00030825922,0.00037347156,0.00005759263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003053562,0.00014206156,0.00018669189,0.00002929755,0.00014828169,0.000015331485,0.000115336516,0.00020686073,0.000057919053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012413886,0.00008871518,0.00007320144,0.00011011792,0.00032268977,0.000012390583,0.00013405728,0.000076772056,0.000009180351],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018511896,0.000046713496,0.4925607,0.000012851031,0.000016033191,5.496679e-8,0.00006316767,0.0000015494643,0.5066818,0.000052197312,0.0002992011,0.0000805816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024250383,0.0020191984,0.79853946,0.000011532505,0.0000058117894,0.00000230975,0.000091697264,0.00004372416,0.1984737,0.00012252915,0.00036773228,0.00007979998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000063507585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018924951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30820808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056305555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042119853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998818448","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2004.05.015","title":"Threats, conservation strategies, and prognosis for suckers (Catostomidae) in North America: insights from regional case studies of a diverse family of non-game fishes","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":187,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Threatened species; Ecology; Outreach; Conservation status; Geography; Habitat destruction; Biology; Environmental resource management; Political science","score_opus":0.08100987379091829,"score_gpt":0.27365334190796625,"score_spread":0.19264346811704797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998818448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975926,0.0001675812,0.00022571385,0.0013269687,0.00002407353,0.00056316657,0.000027480799,0.000012693373,0.000059682683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964818,0.0006353421,0.0017301172,0.0009623969,0.000006314272,0.00011079888,0.00006520545,0.0000026281446,0.000005407286],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923944,0.000043121072,0.0002827495,0.00025107517,0.00007269433,0.000110934605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993644,0.0003096544,0.00019524922,0.00007480311,0.000036456313,0.000019466193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000084456035,0.00011134546,0.00025228673,0.000035904006,0.00008226218,0.000005722437,0.000064530584,0.000072577626,0.000008229352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011652174,0.00008582344,0.000028588964,0.00020176594,0.0007795273,0.00022217534,0.00011024076,0.000044802196,0.0000015956873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015594655,0.00012332447,0.99579144,0.000025910404,0.00005933856,0.000017222554,0.001042281,0.0001413491,0.0010263647,0.00042970444,0.0006366255,0.00055048394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008042042,0.00035817784,0.98688114,0.000018540402,0.00002730259,0.0000014988943,0.00606499,0.0001532224,0.00009848632,0.0053242277,0.0001720872,0.00009609722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027768298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023353087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020576257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005426784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016347787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99446815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001076865","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.09.020","title":"Extent and conservation of tropical dry forests in the Americas","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":559,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research; University of Alberta; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf forests; Tropical forest; Agroforestry; Geography; Dry forest; Tropics; Forestry; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.0349270508460397,"score_gpt":0.2716435825648472,"score_spread":0.23671653171880752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001076865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98901635,0.000038415405,0.00063105254,0.009582011,0.000013711208,0.0001376111,8.044866e-7,0.000007750207,0.0005722957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955918,0.000052282856,0.00061525195,0.0037049316,0.00000526184,0.000010658484,0.000005776982,6.749403e-7,0.000013361284],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994813,0.00010802055,0.00015845793,0.000112394664,0.00006073049,0.00007907982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996384,0.00021973759,0.00006500651,0.000058035293,0.000007746122,0.000011080116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017340784,0.00004993059,0.000084210726,0.000012194757,0.000057027293,0.000004192286,0.00006236672,0.000053865384,0.000033961627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018055867,0.000030023255,0.000015049896,0.00012256211,0.0002489903,0.00005055758,0.000021932083,0.000057622914,0.000007061131],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021697912,0.000047344798,0.991839,8.8335327e-7,0.0000011703315,9.304877e-7,0.00012969883,0.000016240523,0.00073022465,0.0053582937,0.00012698263,0.0017275615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014988043,0.00018954554,0.98637974,0.0000023625425,0.0000023316315,0.0000012487722,0.00007654598,0.0026366576,0.000013802943,0.010252637,0.0002576482,0.000037578604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008089067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006812178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065754517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015613685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000027132457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122431286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001274460","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.006","title":"Recent declines in northern tall-grass prairies and effects of patch structure on community persistence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Geography; Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Range (aeronautics); Quadrat; Introduced species; Biology; Shrub","score_opus":0.039429911075955185,"score_gpt":0.29316087798226137,"score_spread":0.2537309669063062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001274460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982492,0.0003272547,0.000011778782,0.0011011956,0.00002477856,0.00022281503,0.000012994402,0.00000679524,0.00004320796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998603,0.00036072585,0.00016389016,0.00064740505,0.00002051393,0.0000049499254,0.00018843342,0.0000031932045,0.000007926879],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991346,0.0003167264,0.00015700063,0.00017512884,0.000077307675,0.00013926312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945366,0.00014236307,0.00006759187,0.00018139815,0.0001177294,0.000037248963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017911552,0.00010414351,0.00014020015,0.00003246716,0.000059639664,0.000011476822,0.00012308259,0.00018249135,0.0000022413533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090304605,0.00007931386,0.000025343295,0.00010732729,0.00013636597,0.000004176439,0.00005013371,0.00016111443,6.390638e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021229207,0.0000642532,0.5263213,0.000015031157,0.0000050124354,0.0000015957045,0.00003367281,0.0000028136487,0.47026658,0.000011408318,0.000029577686,0.0030364713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003503596,0.0013575223,0.9154403,0.000024640276,0.000002551448,0.0000031142515,0.00005012847,0.000024378105,0.08167888,0.00015188582,0.00083170534,0.00008451005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009287301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028519456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38911903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014982806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027935557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32343253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001467053","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.008","title":"Integrated and novel survey methods for rhinoceros populations confirm the extinction of Rhinoceros sondaicus annamiticus from Vietnam","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Barrie Urology Group; Queen's University","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund","keywords":"Rhinoceros; Endangered species; Threatened species; Subspecies; Critically endangered; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Near-threatened species; Population; Geography; Captive breeding; Biology; Zoology; Ecology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.14984027833243513,"score_gpt":0.3424957095226395,"score_spread":0.1926554311902044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001467053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8788582,0.00008897942,0.11895609,0.0011120486,0.0002605554,0.0004923476,0.00011762546,0.0000332283,0.000080905935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97750425,0.0000103924285,0.020479547,0.0013051085,0.00004591556,0.00009789015,0.00049684057,0.000006798171,0.000053246786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867594,0.00043968167,0.0003581402,0.00023315822,0.000077507015,0.00021558802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982618,0.0012196468,0.00023026826,0.00016141645,0.000066423374,0.000060432623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015290072,0.00013766176,0.00018843713,0.00001903909,0.00027243095,0.000018842544,0.00012244536,0.00021838765,0.00036283137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013214351,0.00008908356,0.000048574606,0.00020542573,0.0003261947,0.00023456711,0.00006943497,0.000116850926,0.00001346782],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000941282,0.000086872766,0.96973383,0.00000209657,0.000011696889,1.6668729e-8,0.00010369943,0.000009670363,0.022106078,0.0013172751,0.00073167897,0.0058029247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003434383,0.000097623444,0.98685205,0.000003567148,0.000026382975,0.0000016060478,0.00009151194,0.0060670604,0.000679445,0.0016829817,0.004037753,0.000116585186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018479208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000613996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098646045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005071061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014298413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3972749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001758322","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.02.012","title":"Thresholds in nesting habitat requirements of an old forest specialist, the Brown Creeper (Certhia americana), as conservation targets","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Snag; Nest (protein structural motif); Habitat; Ecology; Forest management; Forestry; Wildlife conservation; Nest box; Forage; Biology; Geography; Predation","score_opus":0.06541535065942038,"score_gpt":0.2640918516222248,"score_spread":0.19867650096280443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001758322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917251,0.000022919896,0.00011413535,0.0038291467,0.00006879557,0.00034869224,0.0000041019093,0.000028880513,0.0038582166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939335,0.00004930393,0.0005669894,0.005134913,0.000055025375,0.000027582017,0.000057611112,0.0000063031016,0.0001687929],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987479,0.00015135483,0.00035119374,0.00028192476,0.00025323138,0.00021440085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994295,0.00011227209,0.00017658481,0.00021316041,0.000018493916,0.00004993777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041141873,0.00012904921,0.0001623112,0.00002957,0.00018196146,0.00001585003,0.00023604966,0.00007382247,0.00028781718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021678691,0.00008278484,0.000042106443,0.00031065568,0.00042259472,0.00024024611,0.00011090889,0.000090185116,0.000043896795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005316332,0.00008663031,0.9916249,0.0000029352157,0.0000041113485,0.000010083697,0.00013843687,0.0002677808,0.0034883206,0.00072680454,0.002548962,0.0010479046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032575353,0.00020953441,0.988407,0.000012117383,0.0000043674513,0.00000480905,0.00010389898,0.0020210424,0.00012420146,0.0014315436,0.0072370153,0.00011870222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063354545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031953605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004688054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007063619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000116001975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9577355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006809702","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.028","title":"Cost-effective abundance estimation of rare animals: Testing performance of small-boat surveys for killer whales in British Columbia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Humane Society International","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); IUCN Red List; Abundance estimation; Population; Fishery; Ecology; Endangered species; Geography; Rare species; Distance sampling; Transect; Population size; Estimation; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Biology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.0913858292275923,"score_gpt":0.28085991837884117,"score_spread":0.18947408915124886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006809702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972838,0.00009588336,0.0007668815,0.000050520397,0.000019119727,0.0013288868,0.000016404338,0.000019004567,0.0004194871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922811,0.000072073766,0.0073454124,0.00010550712,0.0000074898157,0.00014308408,0.000021191445,0.0000034760583,0.000020682315],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900407,0.00016136123,0.00034492917,0.0002338395,0.000095790754,0.00016003521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999121,0.0004904287,0.00022545693,0.00007984384,0.000061286475,0.000022003516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086029683,0.000078252684,0.00024538467,0.000010389049,0.000073011084,0.000018636361,0.000116817406,0.00007390849,0.00008991405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013424535,0.00009340616,0.000036332796,0.00030485986,0.0001403711,0.000118037184,0.000070057074,0.00005542055,0.000002985334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021988411,0.000056899327,0.7626343,0.000032832326,0.00000231658,4.0032324e-7,0.000017559285,0.000268749,0.001612992,0.000009308962,0.000057000496,0.23528568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031800516,0.00086200633,0.98305964,0.00010887537,0.000004198413,0.000001684063,0.000016937387,0.014712777,0.00032890216,0.00024757822,0.00023667491,0.00010272209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012397264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03544372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23518296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085901695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007658298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99417925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006950852","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.03.022","title":"Alternative growth histories in populations of Lake Superior brook trout: Critical support for partial migration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Queen's University; University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Great Lakes Fishery Commission","keywords":"Salvelinus; Trout; Fontinalis; Fish migration; Juvenile; Tributary; Habitat; Ecology; Population; STREAMS; Geography; Fishery; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Demography","score_opus":0.1041936038897397,"score_gpt":0.28296593012107174,"score_spread":0.17877232623133205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006950852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98941535,0.0000034068587,0.0054985094,0.0015860186,0.00018627734,0.00034954838,0.000028542798,0.000022615517,0.0029097202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965277,0.000007160289,0.0025793382,0.0005334289,0.000015476355,0.00012982993,0.00005329293,0.0000023703772,0.00015143318],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937874,0.00005204672,0.00022319608,0.0001660112,0.00005518985,0.00012482506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997448,0.00010744508,0.000053648666,0.000053760312,0.000022233768,0.000018122417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017904723,0.000067398454,0.00011804004,0.000023431265,0.00007775134,0.0000027694973,0.00006880875,0.000067175846,0.00069681404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054235855,0.000055647586,0.000031398125,0.000073143834,0.00028617986,0.00014816203,0.000050355615,0.000035474288,0.000011382242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007680148,0.00009832977,0.9591934,0.0000057822517,0.0000041306143,8.407605e-7,0.00044913817,0.0000025801314,0.00039623783,0.037831146,0.0018877998,0.000053805248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021216038,0.00030836853,0.98125225,0.0000020933567,0.000009677925,2.3135402e-7,0.00007881183,0.00028141166,0.0006031637,0.014544944,0.002636906,0.0000700021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003815376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01676701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023286203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042479485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004430563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93563855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007098848","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.039","title":"Assessing the utility of stakeholder analysis to Protected Areas management: The case of Corbett National Park, India","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"The Corbett Foundation","keywords":"Stakeholder; Stakeholder analysis; National park; Business; Environmental resource management; Stakeholder theory; Stakeholder management; Stakeholder engagement; Politics; Public relations; Political science; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.08740437431936181,"score_gpt":0.28049910856330174,"score_spread":0.19309473424393991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007098848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99336684,0.0000033210763,0.0008008584,0.0018425257,0.000036249803,0.00058542524,0.000021918177,0.000015112012,0.0033277562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984645,0.0000018473386,0.0007120492,0.0006816922,0.000010391243,0.000025218276,0.000026892969,0.0000016275994,0.000075776865],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989837,0.00017912459,0.0002555823,0.00021659113,0.00024944908,0.0001155527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992415,0.00020830325,0.00019841774,0.00024761065,0.000071900555,0.000032275082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010521371,0.000087365945,0.00011752256,0.000058494577,0.00027576543,0.000035451107,0.0002660528,0.00006327577,0.00090000767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022389034,0.0000466534,0.00007446235,0.0009897901,0.00036953622,0.00007480125,0.00025978987,0.00010852005,0.000010059874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018959068,0.00007801414,0.9931313,0.000007158017,0.000110338886,0.000005702347,0.00018616387,0.000062766805,0.0019233637,0.00025483663,0.00044386007,0.0037775727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107196036,0.000020770394,0.99324113,0.0000022468203,0.000095145726,0.0000026310904,0.0006295108,0.002320783,0.00019155299,0.00032651125,0.002999797,0.00006269433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093398755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061241083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005097671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022225384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008513311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98544526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007554848","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.10.002","title":"A global assessment of seamount ecosystems knowledge using an ecosystem evaluation framework","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Seventh Framework Programme; Ministry of Education and Science","keywords":"Seamount; Pelagic zone; Oceanography; Benthic zone; Geology; Geography","score_opus":0.10352292077138012,"score_gpt":0.34897183311392865,"score_spread":0.24544891234254854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007554848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98885214,0.00004849489,0.006271975,0.00009296155,0.00027960437,0.0011427066,0.000017264618,0.000038652568,0.0032562187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965532,0.000004224578,0.0030501485,0.000046952497,0.000067637935,0.00022908527,0.000030348168,0.0000039935303,0.000014399286],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984192,0.00042975263,0.0004059178,0.00030826151,0.0002478548,0.00018898275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992887,0.00009995704,0.00022410022,0.00020153749,0.000114365044,0.00007138473],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008767696,0.0001397562,0.00024006501,0.000016740458,0.00012199115,0.000030235102,0.0001511774,0.00012990368,0.0015793386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015112819,0.00009981656,0.000054004006,0.00027178973,0.000048169783,0.00025070272,0.00019777841,0.00005610664,0.00013420417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005339944,0.00016259347,0.989018,0.000029409295,0.000014257623,2.3373372e-7,0.00004016323,0.00017474769,0.0071311565,0.0009877274,0.00036960002,0.002066748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014670624,0.00017478969,0.8012044,0.00004075049,0.000015377454,0.0000041885796,0.00012545334,0.19481646,0.000052214844,0.002524314,0.00076896703,0.00012637892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022455917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018759117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19464171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005240385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003371724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008130610","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.025","title":"Recolonizing sea otters spatially segregate from pinnipeds on the Canadian Pacific coastline: The implications of segregation for species conservation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre; Ministry of Forests; Government of British Columbia; Alberta Innovates; University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures","keywords":"Foraging; Otter; Habitat; Ecology; Interspecific competition; Predation; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.08323088878042742,"score_gpt":0.24622435517005042,"score_spread":0.162993466389623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008130610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8803443,0.000013129061,0.0011478408,0.11255546,0.00009043673,0.0009595974,0.00011434129,0.00003145794,0.004743445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885275,0.00003596844,0.0007187155,0.010100281,0.000064535365,0.00018341962,0.00020767543,0.000008217053,0.00015371095],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987705,0.00023495096,0.00033335589,0.00028018377,0.00016032094,0.00022071949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788773,0.0014071838,0.00026675127,0.00030130416,0.00008200722,0.000054999226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077700155,0.0001469483,0.00016399413,0.000020809644,0.0006668318,0.00004878157,0.00030205384,0.00010114705,0.00032589468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010706183,0.00008310724,0.00007068831,0.00026427716,0.0003409468,0.00007739966,0.00008895633,0.00011233135,0.000053486896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005685891,0.000029429762,0.9413759,0.000006651825,0.000025204143,9.59808e-8,0.00014730608,0.00008393619,0.0041213497,0.023646262,0.020211723,0.010295263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001399847,0.00014585028,0.85410446,0.000011616191,0.000014606355,2.792867e-7,0.000061149534,0.002764011,0.00039989594,0.0048914617,0.13736571,0.00010096398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14503108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54399997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3989689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002140285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004126625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8606622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009977435","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.006","title":"Threats to Canadian species at risk: An analysis of finalized recovery strategies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Leverhulme Trust; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Endangered species; Habitat; Wildlife; Critical habitat; Recreation; Critically endangered; Business; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geography; Environmental planning; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.04445685709558191,"score_gpt":0.24500777012898534,"score_spread":0.20055091303340342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009977435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990556,0.00000910477,0.00020522668,0.00126705,0.000022090017,0.00018246366,0.000027377984,0.000014292726,0.0077164127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969554,0.000045564007,0.00047628654,0.0011791934,0.000009964431,0.000020227528,0.000083629326,0.0000017437025,0.0012279885],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937236,0.000070567854,0.00014308267,0.00018602486,0.00008736392,0.00014057112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996367,0.000042262465,0.000057929185,0.0001446183,0.000011924304,0.000106537394],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015007211,0.000069585985,0.00013363175,0.00006672807,0.00008692846,0.000031829226,0.00011236201,0.000047778583,0.0067680078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004245125,0.00004757258,0.00005101682,0.00034962263,0.0000624776,0.00014203612,0.000050148774,0.000024519193,0.00023153657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014653492,0.000016466407,0.99034935,7.706336e-7,0.00003623274,6.2082796e-7,0.00006142086,0.0016084188,0.0016919676,0.0002710815,0.003253098,0.002695888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057707133,0.000115627714,0.99052656,0.0000013532876,0.000038802245,6.550262e-8,0.00013914527,0.0011493779,0.000047298483,0.0012227242,0.0066275015,0.000073834795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21279252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3228393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11004678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011532557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007704016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99413997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016242205","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.032","title":"Integrating connectivity and climate change into marine conservation planning","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":210,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Climate change; Environmental resource management; Marine spatial planning; Geography; Marine protected area; Environmental planning; Ecology; Computer science; Environmental science; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.05792149686592645,"score_gpt":0.25843280401696517,"score_spread":0.2005113071510387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016242205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929164,0.000017745928,0.0005417431,0.0026763217,0.00008351772,0.00020327857,0.0000014418042,0.00007836455,0.003481169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970309,0.000031795404,0.0011026774,0.0016532559,0.00006706765,0.000060138027,0.000022562303,0.0000035446355,0.000028039258],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925566,0.00010691118,0.00016903899,0.0002423382,0.000070494716,0.00015556706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999534,0.00024001762,0.00009548594,0.00007618514,0.000014658184,0.000039630482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045818015,0.00010834099,0.00014747167,0.000014854877,0.00022369827,0.000024267574,0.00005312446,0.0000635983,0.00009951266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043177567,0.000077228535,0.000018888784,0.00010053089,0.00010286455,0.00016697544,0.00038687413,0.00007380018,0.000032047355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002037245,0.000011734383,0.9594044,0.000010369927,0.0000022560348,5.0124123e-7,0.00013143997,3.3051134e-7,0.002899352,0.002820617,0.00018975513,0.034508836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001576153,0.00015053574,0.9824836,0.000017504162,0.0000037052034,0.0000029577523,0.00007665841,0.0065498757,0.00006704287,0.002910541,0.007466372,0.00011356721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020633908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011840328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034395266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038144546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000013021655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31492883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016275358","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.017","title":"Climate oscillations and conservation measures regulate white-faced capuchin population growth and demography in a regenerating tropical dry forest in Costa Rica","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Northwestern University","keywords":"Tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf forests; Population growth; Geography; Population; Biome; Ecology; Climate change; Tropics; Tropical climate; Dry season; Ecosystem; Forestry; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.03542323076751347,"score_gpt":0.23309395634805397,"score_spread":0.1976707255805405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016275358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99267405,0.00009809984,0.0003213948,0.006167347,0.000055404525,0.00045487407,0.000007181485,0.000051333285,0.00017031253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956193,0.000092702045,0.0028419497,0.0012365096,0.000021323098,0.00006045611,0.000113599686,0.0000074618524,0.000006708449],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821866,0.00043404836,0.00047999303,0.00042954227,0.00016760347,0.00027013716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993617,0.00021812198,0.00016790336,0.000118388794,0.00003261501,0.00010130383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006858319,0.0001702495,0.00022339202,0.00012840334,0.00017105868,0.000045888006,0.000073874566,0.0002620785,0.000014822215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008606651,0.00015118993,0.000023638615,0.0005445345,0.00021970285,0.00038973193,0.00009792481,0.00017464945,0.000005367407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114457915,0.00003928584,0.9952024,0.0000051042502,0.000002601705,0.0000024389733,0.00017164073,0.00041032888,0.00045669868,0.0026521499,0.00011708184,0.00082577683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087813276,0.00010943592,0.9732193,0.000023979912,0.00000657589,0.0000048536513,0.0001041909,0.021209238,0.000018547331,0.0041737985,0.0000739895,0.00017801044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017502463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012439584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021983188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010076262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017433693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.694158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017094970","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2007.03.019","title":"Weighing the costs and benefits of reduced sampling resolution in biomonitoring studies: Perspectives from the temperate rocky intertidal","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine Biology and Ecology Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Biomonitoring; Intertidal zone; Sampling (signal processing); Taxon; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Temperate climate; Sampling design; Biology; Geography; Computer science; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.14639088290218996,"score_gpt":0.3352779778749815,"score_spread":0.18888709497279152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017094970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946595,0.0031215954,0.000012288542,0.0017965374,0.00016219041,0.00014833215,0.0000074714544,0.000009856234,0.00008223697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990516,0.00055980665,0.00010101473,0.00013461613,0.00012005386,0.0000018888519,0.000024074874,7.2285854e-7,0.0000062355684],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991745,0.0002158296,0.00020028048,0.00017770987,0.000057928522,0.00017378564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975533,0.0022177643,0.00006496006,0.000077050405,0.00006629654,0.000020624875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014829654,0.00006720232,0.000111485926,0.000031305222,0.00023669035,0.000013471873,0.00012418756,0.00009730836,0.000033326978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009972369,0.00003210849,0.00001662457,0.00015603591,0.0002827088,0.000061137864,0.000041237472,0.00016923797,0.0000025777579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018612249,0.0000066381535,0.9917768,0.0000016199526,0.000016239173,5.101389e-7,0.0009057387,0.000026744125,0.0019844046,0.00010392463,0.000014156034,0.004977061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012663977,0.0001112476,0.9927916,0.000021182062,0.000002744823,0.000001328062,0.005667696,0.0004230849,0.00037676285,0.00034818676,0.00008657323,0.00004296185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034913104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009409319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059180083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014244096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013717338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52778405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018654129","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.001","title":"Tracking seabirds to identify ecologically important and high risk marine areas in the western North Atlantic","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Manitoba","funders":"Office of Polar Programs; Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Trophic level; Apex predator; Habitat; Geography; Population; Fishery; Pelagic zone; Biodiversity; Foraging; Ecology; Oceanography; Biology; Geology","score_opus":0.039915721282472075,"score_gpt":0.27549379081428366,"score_spread":0.2355780695318116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018654129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983543,0.000007626023,0.000041742012,0.0011250231,0.00005902046,0.00031070635,0.000004114536,0.000024209463,0.0000732312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99714166,0.000030635114,0.00023050484,0.0024578488,0.00003275404,0.000044137294,0.000027055736,0.0000029436908,0.00003244663],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900496,0.00021020106,0.00022853495,0.00020290683,0.00009163301,0.00026179268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953026,0.00019610718,0.000087546585,0.000111146655,0.0000057342754,0.00006920217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000688877,0.00010090922,0.000120337645,0.000016260374,0.000121953024,0.000021083908,0.00014931793,0.00011892687,0.00042345593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002144007,0.000057047866,0.000020974368,0.00015943525,0.00012978987,0.00013383302,0.00016431745,0.00015466017,0.00013280762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002357338,0.00010485728,0.9965916,8.9841535e-7,0.0000017040452,0.000009317208,0.00011280381,0.0000024238173,0.00019976737,0.000027600901,0.00011070048,0.002814735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001400462,0.00014532494,0.9986141,0.0000016683165,0.000011351549,0.000013975121,0.00003408254,0.00000746065,0.000011537004,0.00021388053,0.0007108589,0.00009572701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005103719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004743523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004233151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042154046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000031858026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46365455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020241281","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.025","title":"Flock size and human disturbance affect vigilance of endangered red-crowned cranes (Grus japonensis)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Key Technologies Research and Development Program; Nanjing University","keywords":"Vigilance (psychology); Flock; Foraging; Predation; Ecology; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.03441351234788326,"score_gpt":0.24844100691794938,"score_spread":0.21402749457006612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020241281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976993,0.000100175894,0.0000013710693,0.0016352701,0.00013980982,0.00020381699,0.000016179938,0.0000697058,0.00013437012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992927,0.000030033456,0.00018208675,0.000105853556,0.00019409436,0.000014693946,0.000046976813,7.2900434e-7,0.00013283516],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991343,0.00007117966,0.00021234086,0.00033792338,0.000097009826,0.00014725274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943453,0.00022454085,0.00013156173,0.00006822426,0.000091943315,0.00004921677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023000945,0.00012038319,0.00019160082,0.0000055946957,0.00018785399,0.000020253548,0.00010070473,0.0001749315,0.00012458912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030050377,0.00004388983,0.000057783498,0.00014981203,0.0002190381,0.00007909374,0.00004101429,0.0001387385,0.0000033937724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048583905,0.000038770522,0.28298324,0.0000046336063,0.000002162793,7.33783e-7,0.00000923657,2.772821e-8,0.7134338,0.00034956905,0.000062492545,0.003066762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100693316,0.00032826286,0.95294297,0.000009304981,0.0000076058063,0.000007870508,0.000024990091,0.00000396012,0.04362331,0.00043199837,0.0024029051,0.000116151125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027232346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003133498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6699597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005592102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032173427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17897755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024032905","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.040","title":"Revisiting Western Hudson Bay: Using aerial surveys to update polar bear abundance in a sentinel population","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Nunavut","funders":"","keywords":"Transect; Aerial survey; Abundance (ecology); Bay; Distance sampling; Population; Geography; Shore; Mark and recapture; Physical geography; Sampling (signal processing); Abundance estimation; Habitat; Ecology; Environmental science; Fishery; Oceanography; Cartography; Demography; Geology; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.062916920950096,"score_gpt":0.2849683692265922,"score_spread":0.2220514482764962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024032905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958795,0.000016765396,0.002484699,0.0009704805,0.000052142514,0.00021565417,0.0000031895602,0.0000359116,0.00034171506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99588877,0.000016576669,0.0022711612,0.0016592274,0.000105042425,0.0000067513015,0.000032489592,0.000006900786,0.000013097956],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986055,0.00039415722,0.00030409332,0.00033337218,0.00013899768,0.00022389377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961644,0.00007454807,0.00011786664,0.00012657786,0.000012404158,0.000052177424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013244298,0.00012218737,0.00019386211,0.000021441525,0.00011030857,0.000032308017,0.00011674313,0.000074858464,0.0002931777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004632495,0.00010591078,0.000031988595,0.00024349288,0.000035269954,0.00013993564,0.00026367157,0.00007614959,0.00016051675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016585438,0.000010348784,0.98951244,0.0000057912416,0.0000014245836,8.136583e-7,0.000010732159,0.00009114857,0.003221536,0.00022167306,0.000013492044,0.0068940227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015676966,0.00003455094,0.99126536,0.00002774776,0.0000027365988,0.000001149097,0.000004086068,0.0030924242,0.00003148843,0.00019129895,0.005052956,0.00013946233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009212561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030809157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067545604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111632384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000020820387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025384719","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00248-3","title":"Outcomes of longterm deciduous forest restoration in southwestern Ontario, Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Understory; Ruderal species; Vegetation (pathology); Deciduous; Geography; Trampling; Plant community; Introduced species; Native plant; Plant cover; Restoration ecology; Forest restoration; Ecology; Invasive species; Forestry; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Habitat; Canopy; Species richness; Biology; Forest ecology; Ecosystem; Grazing","score_opus":0.022978815216640112,"score_gpt":0.21316306262289708,"score_spread":0.19018424740625697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025384719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984841,0.000005820141,0.00008162144,0.00011597622,0.00013661303,0.0002335777,0.0000035556652,0.000010811105,0.0009279413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99932593,5.477105e-7,0.00020304015,0.0002926423,0.000003345071,0.000018617935,0.000016621028,0.0000034631364,0.0001357911],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910927,0.0001385436,0.00027677004,0.00017981842,0.00015407737,0.00014152513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953973,0.00015750421,0.00011805667,0.00013959533,0.000009000533,0.000036083118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028881672,0.00009003077,0.00015790993,0.000017196702,0.00002775648,0.0000070437104,0.00009262951,0.00007957845,0.000368003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030011404,0.00006847273,0.000021156095,0.00011863043,0.000047896185,0.00008522782,0.000023814713,0.00006550399,0.000020648986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010253237,0.000025966592,0.9982047,0.0000023846726,0.0000019856036,0.000004744123,0.00005361125,0.0000856395,0.0010889234,0.00012029882,0.00020284884,0.00019860783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021809539,0.000066744455,0.9971549,0.000006234504,0.0000015850245,0.0000017948843,0.000018762157,0.00018700003,0.0002283533,0.00012936284,0.0019042692,0.00008289705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96656585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99890757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032341745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004977762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007634462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40293747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026689849","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2004.06.003","title":"Arctic sea ice trends and narwhal vulnerability","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bayer Canada","keywords":"Oceanography; Bay; Arctic; Sea ice; Arctic ice pack; Climate change; Open water; Population; Habitat; Geography; Environmental science; Physical geography; Fishery; Geology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.057490272060290414,"score_gpt":0.2712938116510199,"score_spread":0.21380353959072948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026689849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98979527,0.00006100489,0.000059256625,0.003936083,0.000024134968,0.00007565167,0.000002184221,0.00004056215,0.0060058557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99717706,0.00005830552,0.000773946,0.0018613331,0.000019456527,0.000014733659,0.000008681482,0.0000022732252,0.000084219224],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932516,0.000058435602,0.00012928405,0.00025572916,0.00009233656,0.00013906974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997426,0.000064560896,0.00003894252,0.000095563526,0.000007811371,0.0000505095],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022705278,0.000086255175,0.00010201709,0.000007711018,0.00012055063,0.000012719384,0.00007200596,0.000057917023,0.0012113996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019746322,0.000061515406,0.000026713928,0.00017142434,0.00021067413,0.000080326885,0.00019958914,0.00007418272,0.00008981309],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030615694,0.00004682905,0.9740263,0.0000052964774,0.000003347253,0.0000017752401,0.00002909464,0.000009436437,0.0004477346,0.00074115524,0.00018529294,0.024473127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022116445,0.00014926483,0.9841315,0.0000031449251,0.000003761353,0.000004071262,0.000011657724,0.000036044392,0.000060840182,0.0026648438,0.01262843,0.000085291074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004420729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014132591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024387835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010838107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002994403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026692173","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.02.031","title":"Re-defining recovery: A generalized framework for assessing species recovery","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University; European Commission","keywords":"Process (computing); Baseline (sea); Population; Legislation; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Process management; Business; Medicine; Political science; Environmental health","score_opus":0.11109821143716876,"score_gpt":0.30250881805885993,"score_spread":0.19141060662169118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026692173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9100646,0.000030353542,0.065463945,0.003924075,0.0003255982,0.00021916558,0.000050078925,0.0001213754,0.019800836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96395195,0.000112730544,0.025899014,0.008743028,0.00014187054,0.00010144619,0.000534401,0.000013063819,0.00050247216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990291,0.00010728766,0.00021697681,0.00029035343,0.00011929782,0.00023695863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990856,0.00055381417,0.00013294525,0.00015413873,0.000018902692,0.000054601314],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047548366,0.00011768508,0.00016089866,0.000015371921,0.00021307047,0.00010452513,0.00012441176,0.00017771311,0.015542277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001659657,0.00009355933,0.00008919729,0.00016099549,0.000113778384,0.0001717603,0.000075165095,0.000080481805,0.00031361863],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049754407,0.00022458092,0.48364666,0.000031341147,0.00003459721,0.0000017984211,0.00013458365,0.000112026726,0.050975382,0.3061271,0.12407246,0.034141924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046360545,0.00026965153,0.5880429,0.000027286464,0.000011489788,0.0000012188412,0.00049954857,0.00089660694,0.0010964363,0.046214234,0.36216527,0.00031175846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057456848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007402841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25991288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022045149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000055649975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98535764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027136921","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.011","title":"Effects of agricultural landscape and pesticides on parasitism in native bullfrogs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Parasite Biology and Host Interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal; Concordia University","funders":"Environment Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Wetland; Biodiversity; Biology; Habitat; Abundance (ecology)","score_opus":0.015366520867306133,"score_gpt":0.2880200507113412,"score_spread":0.27265352984403507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027136921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99706304,0.0000397701,0.000018964229,0.0006859467,0.000024663683,0.0001130177,0.0000018850129,0.000011254386,0.0020414707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99917406,0.000028367587,0.00010482981,0.0006160922,0.000007967725,0.0000065905474,0.000010779839,5.5260455e-7,0.000050768907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960524,0.00006806025,0.00009400622,0.000121884805,0.00003508414,0.00007571264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995974,0.00030700734,0.000043057782,0.00002776818,0.000004705895,0.000020093192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000588647,0.000056950117,0.00008411373,0.000015456677,0.000032986434,0.000003288889,0.000036176556,0.00007259222,0.000069150614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017148252,0.000035690187,0.000014080138,0.00007650065,0.00008019144,0.000049463975,0.000010826525,0.00006575961,0.00002535317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046391044,0.00008557245,0.925022,0.0000011970681,0.0000021432018,0.0000024734586,0.00006680544,0.000016573616,0.071573816,0.001104737,0.00014036223,0.0019379435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001640188,0.0003986769,0.99355197,0.0000133404465,0.0000023349307,0.0000034096793,0.000018222285,0.00003123954,0.0048334473,0.00081359776,0.00012011866,0.000049649636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004575715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023494733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06852996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016390917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000013571592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14554036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031784400","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.016","title":"Development and validation of an expert-based habitat suitability model to support boreal caribou conservation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Rimouski","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Boreal; Critical habitat; Habitat; Threatened species; Taiga; Geography; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Wildlife; Habitat conservation; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Endangered species; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.05620424206138886,"score_gpt":0.2690925328595823,"score_spread":0.21288829079819344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031784400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807505,0.0000015781508,0.01633444,0.0021551074,0.000043468277,0.00035101702,0.000009092226,0.000056928075,0.00029785995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9572775,7.977773e-7,0.036212675,0.0060148,0.000013825022,0.0000856535,0.00037289882,0.000005903748,0.00001598316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986194,0.00020465242,0.00041460042,0.00039199012,0.00017874589,0.00019060783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927026,0.00019881788,0.00014903833,0.00020797516,0.000059010283,0.00011490567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010096494,0.00014310984,0.00018957169,0.00003806642,0.0001552517,0.000017444361,0.00012784208,0.00018132638,0.000100413046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000435427,0.00012460635,0.000025244302,0.00016919954,0.00019576057,0.0002570634,0.00007204811,0.0000664286,0.000020586322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012483972,0.00011644204,0.98121727,0.000006728415,0.0000033857395,1.9463191e-7,0.0003014282,0.0007823739,0.009400892,0.0006979986,0.0005258586,0.0068226047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034963732,0.00035482165,0.9372097,0.0000049155906,0.0000050303875,7.4156304e-7,0.000044019413,0.049393453,0.010078058,0.0008671401,0.0015308834,0.00016159982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005682071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013491905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04861108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009680521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057573045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5081299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032165093","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.027","title":"Shifting targets in the tundra: Protection of migratory caribou calving grounds must account for spatial changes over time","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère des Ressources Naturelles et de la Faune; Hydro-Québec; ArcticNet","keywords":"Ice calving; Tundra; Habitat; Wildlife; Geography; Peninsula; Ecology; Herd; Critical habitat; Fishery; Arctic; Biology; Endangered species","score_opus":0.12997323396805072,"score_gpt":0.3645656814857069,"score_spread":0.23459244751765618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032165093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99451333,0.00020300462,0.0005695585,0.0021124466,0.00044268608,0.0018037689,0.000029920115,0.000025493451,0.00029976165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996323,0.000027257498,0.00010303811,0.0020445725,0.00056066684,0.0008407127,0.00006465261,0.0000065271943,0.000029557215],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985038,0.00041032105,0.00031724246,0.00013442083,0.000076650744,0.0005575369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849725,0.0010070374,0.0002383197,0.00009394661,0.00014141119,0.000022058988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018940401,0.0000980269,0.00020391251,0.000044448636,0.001089161,0.000003645253,0.00008534525,0.0002703297,0.0000910084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010382349,0.00006073403,0.000039772898,0.0001135139,0.000055315035,0.00008004147,0.0000648648,0.00021965595,0.000012457671],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017410473,0.00013343705,0.96457946,0.00015003355,0.00002151112,4.0199706e-7,0.023902098,0.0000012896933,0.006874791,0.0021879103,0.0012133832,0.00076159084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038262003,0.00028529615,0.9738055,0.00003084304,0.000011185697,5.194017e-7,0.005499936,0.00030326506,0.000057825906,0.00014829008,0.019378135,0.0000966194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012642207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04240553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029763326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018059759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007571581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99393266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035566651","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.04.021","title":"The giant squid Architeuthis: An emblematic invertebrate that can represent concern for the conservation of marine biodiversity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Cephalopods and Marine Biology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Marine protected area; Invertebrate; Marine ecosystem; Ecology; Marine reserve; Ecosystem; Marine conservation; Geography; Fishing; Fishery; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.19226835349334825,"score_gpt":0.25623844565345094,"score_spread":0.06397009216010269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035566651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891081,0.00007808667,0.000052688883,0.009518214,0.00014727506,0.00069082406,0.00007884715,0.000036813137,0.00028916917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972919,0.00022264222,0.0002538248,0.0016932506,0.00006560133,0.00006968524,0.0002778789,6.9924465e-7,0.00012451959],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988666,0.00024121995,0.00029948086,0.00027022246,0.000090630914,0.00023185626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837667,0.0009879573,0.00026484235,0.00013786384,0.00017258646,0.00006009274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070748664,0.00013566676,0.00018752438,0.000007705201,0.00048147852,0.000027858832,0.00040910745,0.00012168598,0.0002026986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024714167,0.000037749036,0.00010263798,0.00015247945,0.00042900792,0.00006378041,0.00020394019,0.00008382652,0.000005411789],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007120532,0.00019697724,0.84776825,0.000018662284,0.00007170529,0.0000010500507,0.0003930616,5.063358e-7,0.053943336,0.014249948,0.0024306187,0.08021382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022740455,0.0008321409,0.9727812,0.000005952891,0.000025186257,0.0000035420655,0.0007625391,0.00093031226,0.0022689686,0.00576366,0.016269386,0.00012974095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010670813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015797688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1250129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017549757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001989484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035752209","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.026","title":"Demographic analysis of trade-offs with deliberate fragmentation of streams: Control of invasive species versus protection of native species","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"Saint Joseph University; University of Guelph","keywords":"Petromyzon; Lamprey; Ecology; Habitat; Invasive species; Fishery; Population; Fragmentation (computing); Biology; Introduced species; Fish migration; Habitat destruction; Habitat fragmentation","score_opus":0.06321791285195763,"score_gpt":0.2211057491785301,"score_spread":0.15788783632657247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035752209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954084,0.000009497437,0.0023460202,0.00011933713,0.000021837554,0.00037152966,0.000031519743,0.0000074209993,0.001684443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993379,0.00007541334,0.00046710725,0.000047526355,0.0000024445874,0.000029126897,0.000021952845,0.0000017539314,0.000016776918],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921316,0.00011397705,0.0003198002,0.00014953167,0.00012557014,0.000077940094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991642,0.00018331446,0.0005072686,0.00008294686,0.00005044464,0.000011815277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018028772,0.000084632644,0.00029099412,0.00011551861,0.00003981363,0.0000010483363,0.000078529934,0.000064173175,0.00038111606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012738479,0.000059642214,0.00006962314,0.00067252415,0.00072247034,0.00009925519,0.00003281276,0.000038389757,5.384938e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010051391,0.00016774148,0.97435635,0.000020441943,0.00073862367,3.3302513e-7,0.0005978426,0.00026755474,0.02132651,0.0013075569,0.000035773086,0.00017611723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068612304,0.0012254218,0.97242683,0.0000096778895,0.0003361492,5.0677833e-8,0.0010898408,0.00030794909,0.023608364,0.0002418613,0.0000110755445,0.000056655936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033815004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023503373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039295037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022074208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006032978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41729537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037547705","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.011","title":"Bird community structure across riparian buffer strips of varying width in a coastal temperate forest","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Species richness; Riparian buffer; Buffer strip; Riparian zone; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Habitat; Riparian forest; Temperate rainforest; Species diversity; Fauna; Old-growth forest; Environmental science; Relative species abundance; Geography; Biology; Water quality; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.04023476829040812,"score_gpt":0.27557707790943825,"score_spread":0.23534230961903013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037547705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987611,0.000012059756,0.00016357515,0.0006239461,0.00003463181,0.0001435156,0.000032089556,0.00004008962,0.00018896454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982782,0.000011269444,0.00103314,0.0006021406,0.000011081785,0.000009578029,0.000025239564,0.000004600415,0.000024741068],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991283,0.00027591025,0.00024185046,0.00012511305,0.00006367939,0.00016513593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995358,0.00022132324,0.00009880242,0.000104029794,0.000015721116,0.000024312323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004092207,0.000088870234,0.00014388717,0.000014773702,0.00026318696,0.0000080653335,0.00012457525,0.00013286977,0.00013384112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022916845,0.00006794621,0.000023800592,0.00016115513,0.0003136323,0.00012428733,0.00015223221,0.00025681,0.000022511336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004281311,0.00007125679,0.98403114,0.0000036830547,0.0000054600164,4.602579e-7,0.0005745284,0.0019069238,0.012435547,0.00034569175,0.000035748464,0.0005467745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003931039,0.000092773575,0.9926578,0.000005725262,0.000002101145,0.0000013820492,0.00019118207,0.0044010663,0.00022382545,0.0017811481,0.00017138987,0.00007851263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015876004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14429434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14270674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005086906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000065746776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87132007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038411382","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.024","title":"Ecological and life-history traits predict bee species responses to environmental disturbances","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":736,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Division of Environmental Biology; National Center For Environmental Assessment","keywords":"Ecology; Habitat; Guild; Life history theory; Habitat fragmentation; Biology; Habitat destruction; Trait; Environmental change; Geography; Climate change; Life history","score_opus":0.07572017065011115,"score_gpt":0.1997943729723419,"score_spread":0.12407420232223075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038411382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951894,0.00036125723,6.9924454e-7,0.0034041072,0.00008818314,0.0001896395,0.00013457997,0.00008067443,0.0005514278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971054,0.00015666301,0.000099763536,0.0018367307,0.0002977215,0.000030242665,0.00003529955,5.1112795e-7,0.00043762315],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991151,0.000072066796,0.00017537425,0.000315356,0.00011231901,0.00020977778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992878,0.00049129943,0.000054658074,0.000013755909,0.000013260272,0.00013924795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019453358,0.00014113614,0.00017692495,0.00000867447,0.0002098557,0.0000272884,0.00013849312,0.00014404152,0.0006545858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004077797,0.00005041152,0.000045239856,0.000059631286,0.00026684522,0.000067562985,0.000103732214,0.00014107548,0.000033636417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012555973,0.000055878885,0.38145012,8.8327744e-7,0.0000061561227,0.000002675424,0.000026951288,1.7702533e-8,0.61208266,0.00046085735,0.0033953383,0.0023928662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060394403,0.00045093897,0.81748194,0.0000024381372,0.000003881982,0.000003573889,0.000097769385,0.0000045236006,0.00026427652,0.00010964244,0.18139757,0.0001230828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002706918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007130608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61181843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021544593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000056264153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7167255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042956121","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2005.07.007","title":"Small mammals in agricultural landscapes of Prince Edward Island (Canada): Effects of habitat characteristics at three different spatial scales","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Species richness; Forage; Population; Biology","score_opus":0.016024251128880247,"score_gpt":0.20374104578598065,"score_spread":0.1877167946571004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042956121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99913955,0.00003705924,0.00004919366,0.00041557202,0.000044488716,0.00018740862,0.00001523243,0.0000063788398,0.00010514486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997033,0.000023209777,0.00011345695,0.00007418946,0.000017849992,0.000015509275,0.000021326969,0.0000015909626,0.000029562263],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993506,0.000051123345,0.00023746879,0.00014550757,0.00008694732,0.0001283179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995958,0.00018388506,0.00013350624,0.000052053274,0.000011541034,0.000023193612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006293987,0.000095717965,0.00021628548,0.0000085749025,0.000044348115,0.0000018062722,0.00008548112,0.00008374841,0.00009057737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010063285,0.000056923403,0.000028734048,0.000045879107,0.00014577949,0.000025477928,0.000131564,0.000055054294,0.000005096999],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069236,0.00008118156,0.9486007,0.0000136550625,0.000004118254,0.0000018126166,0.00002284967,0.0000035734524,0.049183305,0.000030620802,0.00006369479,0.0019252414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022781023,0.0001966081,0.99185157,0.000014546933,0.000007963756,9.759198e-7,0.000008121359,0.0000635876,0.00744011,0.000020507914,0.00009155523,0.00007666977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005797283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8537932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84799594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009784457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000057416905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8763796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046178366","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.10.025","title":"A tropical perspective on conserving the boreal ‘lung of the planet’","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Planet; Boreal; Astrobiology; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Astronomy; Biology; Physics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03504458090541746,"score_gpt":0.22703636869210286,"score_spread":0.1919917877866854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046178366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98191315,0.00001442885,0.000031745858,0.0012041252,0.00010985865,0.00034700226,0.000008623457,0.000024594441,0.016346464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869585,0.0000023390476,0.00006117772,0.0011608806,0.00002292602,0.00002031343,0.000002930361,0.0000033355677,0.000030241667],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909705,0.00029885414,0.00015357083,0.00017614948,0.00014449938,0.00012987517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993026,0.000326473,0.000107548745,0.00022809816,0.000010484703,0.000024754143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020857554,0.00008467108,0.0000989982,0.000006579819,0.00011241126,0.000006383244,0.00029005148,0.00008020799,0.00040598403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028517077,0.00003721794,0.000040852938,0.000118431446,0.0003185222,0.000035118577,0.00010856182,0.00012265722,0.00006581466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009602011,0.000060182443,0.9832455,0.000002855277,0.000009126257,0.0000014065772,0.0004344873,0.0000026819987,0.0031403995,0.010383439,0.0023507176,0.00027321317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012173208,0.00017768,0.99533427,0.00000970738,0.000005518466,0.0000041953717,0.00015509612,0.0017576626,0.0008747883,0.00065387494,0.0008492561,0.00005621952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045829406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004618066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016782697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100458994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008121586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69280654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046389321","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.08.001","title":"Range fidelity: The missing link between caribou decline and habitat alteration?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Université du Québec à Rimouski; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Habitat; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Geography; Predation; Home range; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.03607624438249423,"score_gpt":0.2630641670988499,"score_spread":0.22698792271635565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046389321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.901356,0.000018101242,0.0009810493,0.09701005,0.00011702348,0.00019116253,0.000006524992,0.000039829807,0.00028028036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873266,0.000009146788,0.0015773536,0.010699613,0.00023374775,0.000022720202,0.000072232295,0.0000035167513,0.000055026674],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991834,0.00013448665,0.0002198683,0.00022653007,0.000093078146,0.00014261893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991499,0.00053452107,0.000085510874,0.00015835717,0.000019993176,0.000051707502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006938886,0.00009349141,0.00010242361,0.000010753275,0.00038176173,0.000050506205,0.00012773476,0.00017907965,0.0003235527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059520546,0.00005888065,0.0000258418,0.000110301655,0.0003595143,0.00015883657,0.00012264647,0.00022767004,0.000063549465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010943505,0.0000062818854,0.9764602,9.86638e-7,0.0000034476427,5.394577e-7,0.000035978897,0.0000018631381,0.003732706,0.00053683936,0.0009265756,0.018283604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001640473,0.000047686804,0.96950287,0.0000018361266,0.000009530017,0.0000032701428,0.000008004403,0.0010465686,0.00011096705,0.00906964,0.019952577,0.00008301448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027594733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010585567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086310446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016410435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001146056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3542675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046471311","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.026","title":"Cavity characteristics, but not habitat, influence nest survival of cavity-nesting birds along a gradient of human impact in the subtropical Atlantic Forest","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Columbus Zoo and Aquarium; Idea Wild; Neotropical Bird Club; National Geographic Society","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Habitat; Ecology; Predation; Tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests; Subtropics; Tree line; Secondary forest; Biology; Occupancy; Geography","score_opus":0.06328362382506061,"score_gpt":0.29261346645682723,"score_spread":0.22932984263176662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046471311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992292,0.0000058937926,0.000069638314,0.00036350617,0.00004917432,0.0001973871,0.000012026453,0.00001148471,0.00006168178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996893,0.000004819962,0.000097838274,0.0001389235,0.000013514499,0.000014461298,0.00003460178,0.0000027681654,0.0000037810976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988059,0.0002935447,0.00039072116,0.00017738063,0.00015809062,0.00017438215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903667,0.0004983312,0.00023795475,0.00013104908,0.000055779765,0.000040237654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086497207,0.00010581084,0.00023558261,0.000026960584,0.00009337429,0.00000754253,0.00018368431,0.000095173826,0.00000793423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013627987,0.00006605693,0.000046453562,0.0001928249,0.00056931406,0.0000876393,0.00010110613,0.00013143306,0.0000069592784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045750105,0.000104872146,0.9903231,0.000008471109,0.0000050995104,0.000005081036,0.00030858244,0.00018341004,0.007733393,0.0012308632,0.000008640417,0.000042715157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024120367,0.00034484005,0.99698865,0.000011305426,0.000007865945,0.0000039357974,0.00013234878,0.0012429301,0.00005449275,0.0008907866,0.0000049572955,0.00007666549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007983871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019316476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011332605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078857214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020011328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046548020","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(99)00067-1","title":"Reef classification by coral morphology predicts coral reef conservation value","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Coral reef; Acropora; Reef; Coral reef organizations; Aquaculture of coral; Environmental issues with coral reefs; Coral reef protection; Coral; Resilience of coral reefs; Fishery; Ecology; Biodiversity; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.044684788785370216,"score_gpt":0.23726847038019938,"score_spread":0.19258368159482916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046548020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839171,0.00005734698,0.00024720535,0.007032616,0.0001840389,0.00044912432,0.000043347885,0.0001724448,0.007896778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913782,0.00014934225,0.0004214087,0.0034008848,0.000074744356,0.00010202445,0.00047931782,0.0000093092685,0.0039847805],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831825,0.0002231209,0.0004361095,0.00050021027,0.00020969858,0.00031258422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993343,0.0001364125,0.00016669961,0.00023837211,0.00003391557,0.0000903247],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034491316,0.00020168906,0.00024233857,0.000020861566,0.00025318956,0.000029087276,0.00020185574,0.00021541526,0.0031393778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001772135,0.00015860221,0.000059712955,0.00027822802,0.00031912338,0.00022804417,0.0001158088,0.00014668588,0.0010291723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017067554,0.00012274964,0.7996466,0.000005739055,0.000011141805,0.000003769044,0.00003896361,0.0000042239935,0.029525846,0.0009822311,0.15633109,0.013156968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039742302,0.00032109412,0.85413253,0.000007978274,0.0000111417685,0.0000109262255,0.000029641345,0.003971744,0.00021579806,0.0011796246,0.13952713,0.00019499227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011572962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001224839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05448592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001476742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013346571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050047271","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.007","title":"Conifer plantations consistently act as barriers to movement in a deciduous forest songbird: A translocation experiment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds en Fiducie pour la Faune du Nouveau-Brunswick","keywords":"Songbird; Habitat; Fragmentation (computing); Deciduous; Ecology; Habitat fragmentation; Habitat destruction; Resistance (ecology); Geography; Insectivore; Biology","score_opus":0.03122150400635014,"score_gpt":0.275781344082868,"score_spread":0.24455984007651782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050047271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938405,0.00005502939,0.0013861641,0.002393044,0.00011365782,0.0005023931,0.0000064736823,0.00003512351,0.0016675785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922169,0.000034234916,0.0011561872,0.006140142,0.000014800667,0.00031390908,0.00003647573,0.0000046209666,0.0000827479],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990509,0.000103296035,0.0002629065,0.00020465633,0.000111096386,0.00026715017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951476,0.00015685265,0.000060747716,0.00009112807,0.000014023523,0.0001625011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003199638,0.00011435277,0.00013370872,0.000041368814,0.00017020985,0.000011693147,0.000081534396,0.00009617929,0.00088399777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027944357,0.00009564527,0.000032371274,0.00016682885,0.000123738,0.00014831217,0.000045740177,0.00006840201,0.00041938658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006414038,0.0001136899,0.9848654,0.0000015883817,0.000010244529,9.857055e-7,0.0016330242,0.00044977944,0.0065772654,0.0056307283,0.0002466128,0.00040650507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047770812,0.00014994295,0.9944641,0.0000071335503,0.000005768478,0.0000018869067,0.0010043498,0.0006492814,0.00079248345,0.0013084791,0.0009952983,0.00014355316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035791832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025356526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00959868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018013928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021623438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96791553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050798716","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.018","title":"Population genetic structure in polar bears (Ursus maritimus) from Hudson Bay, Canada: Implications of future climate change","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus maritimus; Bay; Biological dispersal; Arctic; Population; Sea ice; Geography; Ecology; Genetic structure; Habitat; Biology; Genetic variation; Demography","score_opus":0.046805919877192285,"score_gpt":0.23398461707627327,"score_spread":0.18717869719908098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050798716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967723,0.00032581927,0.0000050476283,0.0020701834,0.00006633077,0.00029993945,0.00023052547,0.000015969912,0.00021388609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99660456,0.0006777032,0.0010590123,0.0012695396,0.00007763701,0.000025780693,0.0002773359,0.00000534992,0.0000030739654],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903554,0.00007930118,0.0002789902,0.00026381455,0.0001463732,0.00019596971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995975,0.000055737048,0.00013063023,0.00015707486,0.000015553494,0.00004352151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000049915485,0.00011683846,0.00018823071,0.000016055443,0.000112263704,0.0000037896866,0.00014364487,0.000113809096,0.00080087007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050207476,0.00009783567,0.000028400675,0.0002555362,0.00007078769,0.000077131175,0.0001632685,0.00009402792,0.000005712861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017968247,0.000018378158,0.9920695,0.0000045295596,0.0000029577266,0.000002713529,0.000032603057,0.000008730485,0.0010884417,0.00018538999,0.0003572712,0.006211543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015309415,0.000047036963,0.9961966,0.000006473439,0.000004996403,0.0000026459184,0.000027068143,0.00009697008,0.000017434844,0.0003975374,0.0029409037,0.000109188026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7850362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8977761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112739906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021012366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013768841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87689656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053400752","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.08.006","title":"Patterns of protection and threats along productivity gradients in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; University of British Columbia; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Productivity; Biodiversity; Protected area; Geography; IUCN Red List; Photosynthetically active radiation; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Physical geography; Ecology; Proxy (statistics); Environmental resource management; Biology","score_opus":0.06096425694529837,"score_gpt":0.2180387734875444,"score_spread":0.15707451654224605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053400752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992876,0.000008668367,0.00012090868,0.00014884693,0.000034891367,0.00016416295,0.0000021262224,0.0000041511557,0.0002286321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997815,0.000014738449,0.0001053654,0.000056191628,0.0000019353342,0.000022278045,0.0000023325936,8.31659e-7,0.000014808654],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963766,0.000046315177,0.000097693985,0.00012025229,0.000034169552,0.0000639087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998728,0.000020706708,0.000050750168,0.00003850222,0.0000059076497,0.000011313061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000100715275,0.000037701007,0.0000623097,0.0000085428865,0.000032393444,6.661066e-7,0.000025825339,0.000027412238,0.000045953366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005804452,0.000028814358,0.000004909203,0.00005430131,0.00004782828,0.000049989838,0.000034434514,0.000036993526,0.0000012262564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014133812,0.000022241507,0.9972517,0.000003180136,0.0000018627488,7.190115e-7,0.000109777844,0.000003923945,0.00056214945,0.00015648024,0.0000021936335,0.0018716358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000785168,0.000049260303,0.99744534,0.0000029463965,0.0000011378955,8.711832e-7,0.00004722447,0.00026807236,0.00043715726,0.0016281147,0.0000074800823,0.00003389819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6823066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95950735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2772008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007214969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011324675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31980896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054390591","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2012.10.025","title":"Commercial harvesting of Ficus timber – An emerging threat to frugivorous wildlife and sustainable forestry","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Frugivore; Wildlife; Agroforestry; Forestry; Geography; Ficus; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Habitat; Botany","score_opus":0.030598952529756734,"score_gpt":0.2638250916741914,"score_spread":0.23322613914443466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054390591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954123,0.000012272065,0.0006861487,0.0019872582,0.000022622435,0.00023085724,0.0000010492605,0.000023650045,0.0016238767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954536,0.000006546327,0.0024115867,0.0016181861,0.000012872376,0.00003670467,0.000010140399,0.0000027653316,0.0004475885],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939567,0.000061662424,0.00015221973,0.00016260575,0.000051590083,0.00017627674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996652,0.00012408858,0.000060286467,0.000069674905,0.00002876965,0.000051967094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019941897,0.0000705081,0.00010491888,0.000015462434,0.00019998776,0.000013485132,0.000064281194,0.00007311796,0.0002362745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024251001,0.00005439599,0.000012730783,0.00009767021,0.00016235022,0.00020615435,0.00014572944,0.000051787196,0.000034475837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009266212,0.00002715016,0.9949727,0.0000050243525,0.0000034984766,0.0000011170717,0.0002158436,0.00027923254,0.0006635541,0.0015921035,0.00056972855,0.0016607884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001014724,0.00015670074,0.9925347,0.000003386043,0.0000033797357,0.0000016472665,0.00047338547,0.0030219743,0.000028324821,0.0031701017,0.00043108148,0.00007382703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022603716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066010596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002742742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002536338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000039432684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34170207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056269783","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.09.004","title":"Removal of introduced predators, but not artificial refuge supplementation, increases skink survival in coastal duneland","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Exclosure; Predator; Predation; Skink; Ecology; Biology; Invasive species; Lizard; Grazing","score_opus":0.030421210830362568,"score_gpt":0.25730552816146957,"score_spread":0.226884317331107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056269783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99631083,0.0000052341297,0.00018248323,0.0027215716,0.00009735079,0.00027596572,0.000045109417,0.000033767206,0.00032768268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99728405,0.00001179804,0.0008361453,0.001324753,0.0000716868,0.000013965009,0.00038379926,0.0000033971653,0.000070387716],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854887,0.00026898258,0.0004870071,0.00031437507,0.00017631466,0.00020448088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994068,0.00018777495,0.0001835985,0.00014948752,0.000027464223,0.000044871256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006112474,0.00012539867,0.00020337835,0.000046248377,0.00009092812,0.0000121521725,0.00013703192,0.00015971206,0.0007332201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053107296,0.000108879154,0.00003851442,0.00028109318,0.00016999421,0.00020043588,0.00005666769,0.00010920896,0.00003918737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004589855,0.00021298733,0.94885814,0.000002010863,0.000004325117,0.000012402987,0.000029290653,0.000033407843,0.04382668,0.0046805907,0.00048718273,0.001394001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004929242,0.00029915737,0.98984706,0.0000056388967,0.00000643688,0.0000103574475,0.000039927963,0.0002953536,0.0048865792,0.00297223,0.0010189068,0.00012540934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006994388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016805654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040988944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056877343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002613102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80282456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056733293","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.05.026","title":"Fire management for biodiversity conservation: Key research questions and our capacity to answer them","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":498,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Adaptive management; Environmental resource management; Scope (computer science); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Sustainable management; Management science; Environmental planning; Ecology; Business; Geography; Engineering; Environmental science; Sustainability","score_opus":0.11639882355831213,"score_gpt":0.30006490197184527,"score_spread":0.18366607841353313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056733293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98485404,0.0000038244457,0.0004766719,0.011979005,0.000249396,0.0011468099,0.000037981026,0.000065862085,0.0011863774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99026984,0.0000057972366,0.0072489907,0.0019775112,0.000044963912,0.00016677917,0.000024565903,0.0000034399525,0.00025808584],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988872,0.00018763648,0.00014632879,0.00036335064,0.00018393638,0.00023157161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931556,0.00024987568,0.000042323747,0.0002072531,0.00006404506,0.00012094825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013190401,0.00010186975,0.00010926845,0.000029103685,0.0004518755,0.00005160516,0.00017901832,0.00014213624,0.00012455853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005198715,0.00008204505,0.00002821263,0.00025504766,0.00014637476,0.00013202424,0.00019598418,0.00019012022,0.00037864337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008728034,0.00013910758,0.8860999,0.00003371756,0.000012077934,0.0000022262532,0.00015645745,0.0000024746203,0.021916388,0.0075432467,0.07617577,0.007831404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024414528,0.00018366343,0.8269759,0.000013930095,0.0000060456537,0.0000044057942,0.00016085322,0.0010088419,0.0005028843,0.0020515425,0.16869389,0.00015392463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018101027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094548624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09251811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007334819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008390208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4866821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056812645","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.01.026","title":"The effects of including marine ecological values in terrestrial reserve planning for a forest-nesting seabird","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts","keywords":"Habitat; Marine reserve; Ecology; Nature reserve; Terrestrial ecosystem; Seabird; Marine protected area; Habitat conservation; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Geography; Biology; Predation","score_opus":0.048299055147897,"score_gpt":0.29177499787200833,"score_spread":0.24347594272411133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056812645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99694544,0.0000074445393,0.00013955469,0.0015820257,0.00037367648,0.00062840915,8.512494e-7,0.000034619483,0.00028800187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974136,0.000005155387,0.0018686758,0.0003800748,0.00008655805,0.00018193587,0.000018242812,0.0000045497827,0.00004120904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989045,0.0001774541,0.00034139038,0.00023445439,0.00009700773,0.0002451395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99470377,0.004938391,0.00018257297,0.00012930811,0.000012067008,0.000033880624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011944056,0.00010459467,0.00015634256,0.00002372036,0.00028647942,0.000017793896,0.00022581739,0.00023043736,0.00003014132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009043358,0.00006641426,0.000049487753,0.00018121414,0.00030186918,0.00011035708,0.00022616317,0.0002237775,0.000005204707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022827028,0.0000511235,0.984565,0.0000067102746,0.0000039197857,0.0000025942759,0.000044541608,0.00005118101,0.012081688,0.00070467114,0.00034735934,0.001912929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006543662,0.00034006283,0.9729286,0.000012990797,0.000005073484,0.0000019123784,0.000026274638,0.0057860245,0.0003378234,0.019070001,0.0007513842,0.00008551784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028457656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020823684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01836533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040368806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018551944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058340791","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2003.10.007","title":"Comparison of Coleoptera assemblages from a recently burned and unburned black spruce forests of northeastern North America","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Geography; Taiga; Boreal; Black spruce; Ecology; Habitat; Forestry; Interception; Fire regime; Fire ecology; Environmental science; Ecosystem; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06128688466937263,"score_gpt":0.25753078716312505,"score_spread":0.19624390249375243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058340791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99834067,0.00017623855,0.000009838031,0.0009260154,0.00004002601,0.0001793085,0.000090480484,0.000018321765,0.00021913079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993947,0.000080287,0.00016269716,0.00019979096,0.000012343018,0.0000033823949,0.00013026828,3.0966063e-7,0.000016205895],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991051,0.00015771658,0.00028280058,0.00021664861,0.00009304367,0.00014470567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990808,0.00044629848,0.00026381444,0.000042020663,0.00012254839,0.000044559503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000098252734,0.000114983195,0.0003234507,0.000010509692,0.00009421257,0.000008627953,0.00011135247,0.00012353215,0.000097005315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022000006,0.000047129983,0.000054405205,0.00019621449,0.00036657383,0.00005129477,0.000047778747,0.00006885706,0.0000073050646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011226412,0.0001267412,0.9857774,0.0000051585753,0.000027818773,9.904687e-7,0.000119255565,0.00000291991,0.010999884,0.00015137061,0.00008860607,0.0025875827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019275388,0.0007253951,0.99344647,0.000011533027,0.000017568325,3.2194268e-7,0.0006616605,0.000054476535,0.0029019853,0.00042837148,0.0014607239,0.00009876944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054990733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005116804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008097899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000071851064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005544203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28552967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059869452","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00178-7","title":"Human disturbance and nesting success of Common Eiders: interaction between visitors and gulls","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Parks Canada; Louisiana State University","keywords":"Eider; Nesting (process); Nest (protein structural motif); Incubation; Predation; Disturbance (geology); Ecology; Wildlife; Incubation period; Biology","score_opus":0.07083191640565062,"score_gpt":0.2893350778020185,"score_spread":0.21850316139636788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059869452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992271,0.0000230005,0.00002143893,0.0003610435,0.000024098057,0.000083156374,0.0000023635262,0.000015362202,0.00024243363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999678,0.0000064554206,0.00011677262,0.00011655781,0.00001749871,0.0000039775914,0.000007614022,0.0000016589782,0.00005145904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954754,0.000057803936,0.00014158177,0.0001402102,0.000037824128,0.00007506662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972206,0.00010644943,0.00009188106,0.000048807968,0.000004251233,0.00002653326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009716025,0.00005634656,0.000098139746,0.000009395099,0.00010894127,0.000008648308,0.000044032247,0.000080234786,0.00023475783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004187223,0.000043827546,0.00001014745,0.000053380354,0.0002548909,0.00013654264,0.0000586744,0.00006557139,0.0000073426518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002541271,0.000023110695,0.9904976,0.000002516576,0.0000013776248,6.797191e-7,0.000043354536,7.3426935e-7,0.0043124333,0.00001565309,0.00005592293,0.005044068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009911241,0.00011680358,0.9987489,0.000007761122,0.000007375474,0.0000021923036,0.000033549524,0.00006408952,0.00051039795,0.00016476202,0.00018994026,0.000055112178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001706241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008497279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008251295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001666233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":3.4872582e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25704336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061492867","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.04.025","title":"Dissecting habitat loss and fragmentation effects following logging in boreal forest: Conservation perspectives from landscape simulations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Wildlife; Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Fragmentation (computing); Habitat destruction; Habitat fragmentation; Ecology; Habitat; Taiga; Biodiversity; Species richness; Landscape ecology; Abundance (ecology); Clearcutting; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.01429101955274813,"score_gpt":0.25111377587123246,"score_spread":0.23682275631848432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061492867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944236,0.00007872591,0.00089291076,0.0035899375,0.000112644084,0.00039890286,0.0000044400067,0.000082206076,0.00041663458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964491,0.000015433236,0.0012254817,0.0019901516,0.000055089313,0.000024820365,0.00021611925,0.0000059088184,0.00001787589],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987507,0.00016354279,0.00030343464,0.00041955058,0.00013405367,0.00022873387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988251,0.0008527078,0.00013492376,0.000112007074,0.000021608563,0.00005369542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002801366,0.00016362504,0.00018748046,0.000062029685,0.0002449492,0.000045578254,0.00008286464,0.00018830359,0.000056184133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071411364,0.00014919581,0.000044161778,0.00027945303,0.00010084073,0.0005040221,0.000041535193,0.00015590858,0.000013738402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061914565,0.000069064125,0.9936952,0.0000025239694,0.000007962269,0.000008452774,0.00060204667,0.0004852418,0.003132481,0.0007812241,0.000078400786,0.0010754927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072025514,0.00015030021,0.96158755,0.000027476564,0.00001399144,0.00000139044,0.00045268526,0.02170583,0.00008406219,0.015048148,0.000035235353,0.00017310724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084838236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002359892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032107677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011693444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010718785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60840285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062471848","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(99)00185-8","title":"Status and conservation of the gray wolf (Canis lupus) in wildlife reserves of Québec","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Canis; Gray wolf; Threatened species; Poaching; Geography; Nature reserve; Population; Predation; Ecology; Wildlife conservation; Forestry; Habitat; Biology; Demography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02353941462638394,"score_gpt":0.2292791473160979,"score_spread":0.20573973268971396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062471848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910079,0.000056173332,0.00000693386,0.007897923,0.000049551505,0.00026699548,0.000008542682,0.0000138713085,0.0006920602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968765,0.00011477002,0.0001886213,0.002456178,0.000007765416,0.000020753603,0.00001211924,0.0000037372217,0.00031957508],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881595,0.00026123863,0.0004053527,0.00021450518,0.00013545711,0.00016750555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992827,0.00029419383,0.00018371538,0.0001832043,0.00002142672,0.000034733002],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040330683,0.00010232249,0.00017757785,0.00002511725,0.00008143934,0.0000055196015,0.00015182229,0.00015037635,0.0010890821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037147774,0.00006888776,0.000037572656,0.0003526483,0.00061425584,0.00016222878,0.000071976894,0.00010493717,0.000014145107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010589937,0.000059110975,0.9939291,0.0000066297735,0.000004306468,2.679947e-7,0.00015956076,0.00004893867,0.0022289508,0.00046522493,0.0013305604,0.0016614601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000356437,0.000098227356,0.99123144,0.000018148856,0.0000056182967,0.0000016670056,0.000063195024,0.00041654558,0.0003534847,0.001265977,0.0061108624,0.00007842421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03217358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038526483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063529024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006383756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053865944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063425988","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00341-5","title":"Black bear (Ursus americanus) survival and demography in the Bow Valley of Banff National Park, Alberta","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Ursus; National park; Demography; Population; Vital rates; Geography; Wildlife management; Mark and recapture; Mortality rate; Biology; Ecology; Population growth; Habitat","score_opus":0.03357097316575039,"score_gpt":0.23878213727173703,"score_spread":0.20521116410598664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063425988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98736465,0.000020083076,0.00007235762,0.003458277,0.00004082824,0.00018120407,0.0000027386418,0.0000067281567,0.008853119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971613,0.000036677106,0.00037723896,0.0023093845,0.000009936838,0.000022146878,0.000018332457,0.0000023511207,0.000062601255],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988829,0.00041091954,0.00021174113,0.00020078356,0.00015783907,0.00013585557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902576,0.0007400933,0.00010194822,0.00008835857,0.000018481509,0.000025341285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007548337,0.00008583996,0.00011552621,0.00002704089,0.00007248527,0.000008677261,0.000119188655,0.00010415257,0.0002920033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065693946,0.000058512036,0.00003217165,0.00034321158,0.0005265318,0.00008699366,0.000026664264,0.00009486825,0.000026636628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002913462,0.000062930325,0.9887476,0.0000014795357,0.000005159774,5.3909207e-7,0.000101860365,0.000028301316,0.00038025097,0.009510434,0.00091661507,0.00021567606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002578128,0.00010432933,0.98822635,0.000002494601,0.000004053161,0.000002180686,0.00021671846,0.00023044157,0.000025712154,0.0054627163,0.0053908867,0.000076293036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006823102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009856338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009796667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022213932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015653983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31972316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064066418","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.07.016","title":"Continental-scale assessment of the hybrid zone between bobcat and Canada lynx","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Introgression; Sympatry; Hybrid; Backcrossing; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Biology; Population; Ecology; Geography; Zoology; Sympatric speciation; Genetics; Botany; Demography","score_opus":0.013557417434025923,"score_gpt":0.23012950805023374,"score_spread":0.21657209061620783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064066418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991745,0.000056923083,0.006608133,0.0007227003,0.00008578076,0.00012247758,0.000026156855,0.0000031999502,0.00062961504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624324,0.0000075867524,0.0028369674,0.00060184236,0.00008602492,0.000006371412,0.00007390681,0.00000322793,0.00014081782],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944437,0.00008879964,0.0001482917,0.0001564891,0.000070318056,0.00009174834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996557,0.0000366753,0.00007980586,0.00015208649,0.000041729385,0.00003395081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012210198,0.00007330194,0.000100851896,0.0000042313513,0.00005302783,0.0000046162445,0.00010851321,0.00005784567,0.00000641188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058854515,0.00004681476,0.000024683693,0.000021316117,0.00011739533,9.498349e-7,0.0000785593,0.000044714867,1.7204665e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008376279,0.000014032483,0.91308254,0.0000068237473,0.000013111138,2.0809152e-8,0.0000030829624,0.0000061670435,0.08252607,0.0013354437,0.0012437252,0.0017605916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019408125,0.0001629238,0.9571343,0.000004500515,0.000008513511,0.0000014817672,0.000011439353,0.000017285603,0.022498103,0.00031639912,0.019585967,0.000064996195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011004656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014997502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06002797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006768881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075585594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99558115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064728061","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.11.019","title":"Second chance for the plains bison","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":173,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Bison bison; Introgression; Endangered species; Geography; Biodiversity; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Grassland; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.04430881076701486,"score_gpt":0.28041553285691334,"score_spread":0.23610672208989847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064728061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78925484,0.0005274481,0.20836002,0.00058353,0.00019813153,0.00030477418,0.000018625515,0.0000113100705,0.00074131304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875848,0.000021929525,0.0089680385,0.00218296,0.00035935635,0.000037078302,0.000087061686,0.0000053978333,0.00075334543],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994688,0.000019173487,0.000129376,0.00018023432,0.000039473274,0.00016292352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959344,0.00012272682,0.000050497627,0.00014678935,0.00005670257,0.00002986886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031833365,0.00007761963,0.000058593934,0.000008335808,0.00011791641,0.000008602286,0.00013146551,0.00013619321,0.000035923447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015161108,0.000047900314,0.00004641355,0.000042506115,0.00008807331,0.0000011224495,0.000028628689,0.00004232606,0.0000043748387],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00116405,0.00017451745,0.05452898,0.000033215067,0.000117501186,4.1389137e-7,0.00014587796,0.00009906508,0.75677806,0.109194115,0.026824677,0.05093954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030758535,0.0005327694,0.6076236,0.0000023601408,0.0000059305903,0.0000027195538,0.00005462241,0.00003740368,0.0334763,0.0021836108,0.355663,0.00011010687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000034698608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006715753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72330177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000042367783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018121904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19533181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066719943","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.05.020","title":"Metapopulation dynamics and threatened species management: Why does the broad-toothed rat (Mastacomys fuscus) persist?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Metapopulation; Threatened species; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Habitat; Population; Demography; Biological dispersal; Sociology","score_opus":0.033245649721309396,"score_gpt":0.2076862867625211,"score_spread":0.1744406370412117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066719943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840746,0.000038665552,0.001773129,0.008411786,0.00012953949,0.00034587082,0.000004359872,0.00008817621,0.005133866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99301153,0.00022525803,0.0006875862,0.0037798404,0.000032292995,0.000041775318,0.000087624576,0.00000554154,0.002128557],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897337,0.00018172347,0.00021814162,0.0003036797,0.00013985095,0.00018321068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951386,0.00013751062,0.00011033013,0.00018439267,0.0000157172,0.000038165494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028191108,0.00014229913,0.00013640494,0.000024998773,0.0006076071,0.000027520548,0.0001567077,0.00012277837,0.00049768994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006488116,0.00007770641,0.00005025732,0.00020828155,0.00054443465,0.00021570355,0.00012708751,0.00009421743,0.000049573064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058190675,0.00003081204,0.9883157,0.0000030274582,0.000019851908,0.0000042276656,0.00009073206,0.000035057805,0.00039780344,0.0069266893,0.0021002428,0.0020176428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002641316,0.000052927484,0.986968,0.00000301271,0.00002448138,0.000009152924,0.00019803959,0.004486029,0.000059670263,0.0029168716,0.0048895874,0.00012814482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013926422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006456449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0089369165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008548419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000037504901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5449356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068727316","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.006","title":"Incorporating uncertainty into analyses of red-crested pochard habitat selection","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé","keywords":"Habitat; Brood; Ecology; Biology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Habitat fragmentation","score_opus":0.05586320982887089,"score_gpt":0.2962033709055535,"score_spread":0.2403401610766826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068727316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99322325,0.000015346452,0.0015637792,0.004138636,0.000042500214,0.00016262753,0.0000016099933,0.000065259956,0.0007869904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923136,0.0000063870702,0.0058031026,0.0016708722,0.00005188469,0.000022951872,0.000058297643,0.000003831221,0.00006902011],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989364,0.00019412278,0.00036458625,0.00024580714,0.00012408239,0.00013500029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993676,0.0001807953,0.00026211987,0.00010411617,0.000044452197,0.000040913892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041110296,0.00010640057,0.00015409412,0.000037419995,0.00015266954,0.000009234285,0.000112727816,0.00016514608,0.0005116449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049196044,0.0000854235,0.00005047452,0.0004073208,0.00020829943,0.00023392764,0.00006208656,0.00010271791,0.00008956196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006230468,0.000050380073,0.8786902,0.0000024861833,0.0000088617635,3.0605088e-7,0.000027412387,0.002046992,0.114610955,0.00043753977,0.001215774,0.0028468077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019963816,0.00017174512,0.9771455,0.0000063198427,0.000011290515,0.0000021295339,0.000031071933,0.014426915,0.0046594106,0.0021326155,0.0011061446,0.00010720677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057465414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014893556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10995155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001241917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019440604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56021523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069575561","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.005","title":"Narwhals and seismic exploration: Is seismic noise increasing the risk of ice entrapments?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Seismic Waves and Analysis","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pinngortitaleriffik","keywords":"Geology; Seismology","score_opus":0.049967072876039534,"score_gpt":0.23541436097400853,"score_spread":0.185447288097969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069575561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99502665,0.0010391629,0.0010062316,0.002398001,0.00007299793,0.00010283434,0.00006854011,0.000014355548,0.0002712248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99516153,0.0010223979,0.00030254736,0.003277792,0.00009328946,0.0000011100603,0.00010225265,0.0000011570078,0.000037927297],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991036,0.00027837188,0.00021368524,0.00013142332,0.000109776156,0.00016311243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912035,0.00051441375,0.00016249795,0.00010639201,0.00003548356,0.000060842154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000719376,0.00008770214,0.00013011064,0.000028461925,0.00017458612,0.000028485993,0.00008444306,0.00006691994,0.0004246529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018386639,0.000048298883,0.00004812725,0.00017490172,0.00011291939,0.0002660153,0.000011728358,0.000072886,0.000030149295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028752303,0.000011410103,0.9923406,0.000003809661,0.000027470493,1.90966e-7,0.00021503329,0.00024910856,0.00021783668,0.000052488558,0.00024647018,0.0066067916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011501641,0.000051555657,0.93847185,0.00000791658,0.00004350408,0.0000034194982,0.0005574045,0.051706556,0.00018876861,0.0012794047,0.007491557,0.000083019935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033775577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002485161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05386876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000023999924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010926508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51058793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070180465","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.10.032","title":"Soil and climate are better than biotic land cover for predicting home-range habitat selection by endangered burrowing owls across the Canadian Prairies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Abiotic component; Ecology; Habitat; Land cover; Range (aeronautics); Environmental science; Endangered species; Geography; Grassland; Habitat fragmentation; Land use; Biology","score_opus":0.03252151380067326,"score_gpt":0.22847847636104873,"score_spread":0.19595696256037548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070180465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937615,0.000036421705,0.0001609113,0.005283119,0.00011717325,0.00038703877,0.00009481356,0.00004681797,0.00011221419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956104,0.000012433961,0.00024020644,0.0038886666,0.000044865137,0.00008895355,0.00005813644,0.000006842052,0.00004948989],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904156,0.00010779337,0.0001803085,0.00026334755,0.000072106035,0.00033489527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994587,0.0002415888,0.00012509398,0.00008185888,0.000024005383,0.00006877571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005342995,0.00011949813,0.00011866195,0.0000148924555,0.00086619175,0.00005192873,0.00009585784,0.00019708324,0.00006910175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027495166,0.00008157717,0.00003258972,0.00011615837,0.0003048998,0.0002374124,0.000050687257,0.000109967936,0.000027041004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053665397,0.000013306758,0.99656546,0.00000660023,0.000009581465,5.5602237e-7,0.00038209025,0.0000029021628,0.00035510692,0.000028734003,0.002219922,0.00036208436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022389002,0.0001258216,0.9963157,0.00001079297,0.000012545582,0.000004761636,0.00009987113,0.0008908353,0.00014290785,0.00031503977,0.0017386996,0.00011913987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02391673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38510278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36118603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001020013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015386016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9825831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071318671","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.03.014","title":"Use of provisioning ecosystem services drives loss of functional traits across land use intensification gradients in tropical forests in Madagascar","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Provisioning; Ecosystem; Tropical forest; Agroforestry; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Land use; Biodiversity; Geography; Environmental science; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05364966561224094,"score_gpt":0.22358015185849214,"score_spread":0.1699304862462512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071318671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998912,0.0000068205172,0.00014784906,0.00038127578,0.00003778582,0.00047099005,0.000019070068,0.00001321446,0.000010992191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993966,0.000013052456,0.00032875157,0.00013515916,0.000006833089,0.000020273208,0.000060551607,0.0000028071174,0.000035927107],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988649,0.00012723144,0.00040045558,0.00025879405,0.00018407349,0.00016457251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994433,0.00016154545,0.0001921876,0.00011077558,0.000055559667,0.000036640507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017010578,0.00010164842,0.00017418088,0.00006232535,0.000053868353,0.000030728446,0.00010800194,0.000106243686,0.00008685458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011670448,0.00007748166,0.00004128185,0.0002826856,0.00013938732,0.00038322265,0.00014892558,0.00006845444,0.000016192582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067497465,0.00011749766,0.9952981,0.000029734321,0.0000053197937,0.0000014498972,0.00040011873,0.0006844327,0.0025824201,0.00003104238,0.00002543943,0.0007569342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003887627,0.000075480035,0.99103564,0.00005349066,0.0000033201102,0.0000010467552,0.000330227,0.007478779,0.00010672933,0.00009602335,0.0003476383,0.00008288813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038640175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010979302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071152844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078569756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000054092266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61267084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071568548","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00079-9","title":"Birds on organic and conventional farms in Ontario: partitioning effects of habitat and practices on species composition and abundance","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Detrended correspondence analysis; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Species richness; Canonical correspondence analysis; Ecology; Population; Geography; Relative species abundance; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.031427135961817176,"score_gpt":0.25589127060069056,"score_spread":0.22446413463887338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071568548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980787,0.00004795943,0.0000674334,0.0011624339,0.00002973203,0.0001280048,8.9984803e-7,0.0000078730045,0.00047694033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991169,0.00015834169,0.00021112114,0.00043277448,0.000004000256,0.00001166244,0.000010486825,0.0000013785037,0.000053356885],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995544,0.00006888605,0.00011036476,0.00015077408,0.00005049058,0.000065060645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935025,0.00047845754,0.00011957808,0.000027654933,0.0000075738185,0.000016458862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013932984,0.000057574307,0.00008710291,0.000019868632,0.00009986786,0.000009702645,0.000017157641,0.00005129738,0.00006582236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014483591,0.000045938414,0.000006643494,0.000053613883,0.00025686185,0.00009300604,0.000029265158,0.00007193445,0.0000045255492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007322462,0.000061922125,0.9823524,0.0000073719452,0.0000043070277,0.0000021939904,0.00010525086,0.000014003264,0.013650337,0.0036035853,0.0000107360265,0.00011470576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034781307,0.00036431517,0.99605405,0.0000299555,0.0000041413136,0.000004251131,0.000036865167,0.00031009346,0.00030238568,0.0023703317,0.00012424024,0.0000515816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006219972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034037042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033415046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042938842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000034872307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9835893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072921567","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.09.002","title":"Combining human preference and biodiversity priorities for marine protected area site selection in Sabah, Malaysia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Marine protected area; Preference; Selection (genetic algorithm); Site selection; Geography; Biodiversity conservation; Marine biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Computer science; Habitat","score_opus":0.06613842253323379,"score_gpt":0.21804244606556833,"score_spread":0.15190402353233454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072921567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99844736,0.0000041226817,0.000058139834,0.0003642225,0.00001866325,0.00073360273,0.0000043363366,0.000043133605,0.00032644873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905556,0.000008437661,0.000488363,0.00009516831,0.000007339032,0.0001539766,0.000024118877,0.0000012044899,0.00016583869],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949306,0.00003482869,0.00012124902,0.00018604823,0.000043576078,0.00012126322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982226,0.000052385163,0.000052290343,0.000031756892,0.00001886427,0.000022459019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000095228104,0.00007547849,0.00010437894,0.000018658331,0.00014962054,0.000022130103,0.000040456227,0.00005433926,0.00021781202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007079388,0.000057513447,0.000013641259,0.00010091726,0.00006958837,0.00013342212,0.00019794574,0.000051954772,0.000022159391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001577943,0.000015580012,0.9731112,0.000009816277,0.0000020813768,1.2071402e-7,0.00004188192,9.77068e-7,0.024936303,0.000074623786,0.0003736926,0.0014179178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026176227,0.00021032919,0.99598324,0.000007065433,0.0000023227954,9.392947e-7,0.000034300367,0.0015189007,0.00019625637,0.0011933601,0.0005071397,0.0000843804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053328904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019696287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024740048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049619353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000021081346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8061771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073843668","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2005.03.024","title":"The influence of disturbance and habitat on the presence of non-native plant species along transport corridors","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":423,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Grassland; Transect; Native plant; Ecology; Introduced species; Disturbance (geology); Invasive species; Wildlife corridor; Belt transect; Plant community; Geography; Biology; Species richness","score_opus":0.022615989565879974,"score_gpt":0.2237641837441613,"score_spread":0.2011481941782813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073843668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994665,0.000023846733,0.000094574934,0.0043462915,0.000029075556,0.00022516168,0.00002239911,0.000006841977,0.00058680814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897003,0.000118995864,0.00010954145,0.00060808414,0.000012928784,0.000026188956,0.0000073428128,0.0000019627896,0.00014491723],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999293,0.00006491139,0.00025144333,0.00014668808,0.00014934855,0.00009460503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998781,0.00085021165,0.00017674944,0.00014311555,0.000029749359,0.000019155088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027510294,0.00007931815,0.000092351336,0.0000091485535,0.00015671465,0.000008798766,0.00016160292,0.00003984331,0.000051848794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027604442,0.000038995564,0.000028905555,0.00012890236,0.0006270735,0.00014359769,0.000032091277,0.00008488444,0.0000066404896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013037706,0.000041303443,0.9788629,0.0000028048134,0.0000068634267,2.808267e-7,0.00025241514,0.0011005348,0.015668722,0.0019271744,0.00096100714,0.0010456181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007534086,0.00014299151,0.98841226,0.000030936353,0.0000035995934,0.0000011867456,0.00014747011,0.0021472706,0.0035402607,0.00019314104,0.00525398,0.000051565145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003170196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005759809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012128462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002586921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007920084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23104785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075584929","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.03.010","title":"Emerging trends for biobanking amphibian genetic resources: The hope, reality and challenges for the next decade","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Aquaculture disease management and microbiota","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Genomics; University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Wollongong; NSW Environmental Trust; Leverhulme Trust; Memphis Zoo; World Wildlife Fund; Morris Animal Foundation; Australian Research Council; Institute of Museum and Library Services","keywords":"Threatened species; Biobank; Endangered species; Biology; Amphibian; Conservation biology; Biodiversity; Captive breeding; Ecology; Population; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental ethics; Evolutionary biology; Geography; Bioinformatics; Habitat; Sociology","score_opus":0.10680634739502122,"score_gpt":0.27988631370480826,"score_spread":0.17307996630978706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075584929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8389165,0.053642258,0.0023399324,0.10167976,0.0003462974,0.002443244,0.00007998481,0.00013897935,0.00041309302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99276817,0.0024491507,0.0002196345,0.0028673685,0.00010028821,0.00053479517,0.00022887524,0.000009381066,0.0008223185],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991229,0.00013265628,0.00020388713,0.0002770915,0.000015984506,0.00024744053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905,0.00055090437,0.00011307787,0.00019160305,0.00007823436,0.000016180838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032601677,0.00013940528,0.00013949985,0.000030297793,0.0005497537,0.000058283593,0.00021370396,0.00016975596,0.000107186774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020732475,0.00006606975,0.00008656696,0.00008133522,0.00025465683,0.000058357495,0.00008210454,0.000079272264,0.000012918704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045608904,0.000118004624,0.008104663,0.00012373527,0.000501219,3.8736223e-7,0.0016715981,0.000005341767,0.19003265,0.018317984,0.09225694,0.68841136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006457233,0.00013171004,0.21876043,0.000013873299,0.000080442755,0.0000027948527,0.0011615412,0.00010891047,0.00046827627,0.0011199546,0.7773658,0.0001405313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010553363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010212352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68827087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010210061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006952972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42283165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081767525","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.033","title":"Browsing down our natural heritage: Deer impacts on vegetation structure and songbird populations across an island archipelago","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Burke Museum, University of Washington; Washington State University","keywords":"Ecology; Archipelago; Herbivore; Vegetation (pathology); Understory; Geography; Songbird; Woodland; Biological dispersal; Predation; Biology; Population; Canopy","score_opus":0.02855781367390778,"score_gpt":0.28568214272805575,"score_spread":0.25712432905414795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081767525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99686766,0.0000105409135,0.00009440598,0.0022608573,0.0003785404,0.00023164558,0.000016833825,0.00007258658,0.00006696032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953214,0.0000024623525,0.0019037673,0.002427239,0.000108203465,0.00001036684,0.0001843958,0.000007800449,0.00003439244],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989394,0.00012638258,0.00020784563,0.00034514756,0.00012845096,0.0002527528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952084,0.00007979325,0.0001161805,0.00016680469,0.00002268834,0.00009370303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025367865,0.00015494165,0.0001269822,0.000022775095,0.00041638297,0.0000765016,0.00011098661,0.00025886868,0.00012143739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033170587,0.000119021526,0.000027806378,0.00014023627,0.00014804665,0.00043664695,0.000058252772,0.00036876212,0.000043500328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006602755,0.00004027601,0.9488702,0.000002926858,0.0000035555788,0.0000016985392,0.0003519303,0.000055526216,0.046032168,0.00063749164,0.00016041231,0.0037777887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036227892,0.0001511145,0.99117714,0.0000056613903,0.0000058229257,0.000014879172,0.00012501105,0.002868594,0.0003017243,0.0046297694,0.00019288505,0.00016512992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020969752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013713502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045730446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003168126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010788965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7652456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082698400","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.023","title":"Capacity of older plantations to host bird assemblages of naturally-regenerated conifer forests: A test at stand and landscape levels","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; New Brunswick Innovation Foundation","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Snag; Species richness; Generalist and specialist species; Canopy; Biodiversity; Taiga; Geography; Coarse woody debris; Old-growth forest; Forestry; Agroforestry; Biology","score_opus":0.031206909633034498,"score_gpt":0.2369393530871258,"score_spread":0.2057324434540913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082698400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972615,0.000017408836,0.0007207098,0.0014650738,0.00003798121,0.00022853503,0.000047660145,0.000029575856,0.00019150533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998355,0.00000798657,0.00064587145,0.0008284722,0.000012567242,0.000024711422,0.000024290195,0.0000045225,0.000096614545],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999217,0.000105004285,0.00025279878,0.00020497954,0.000097755816,0.00012246246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990915,0.0005603759,0.00014321049,0.00010481289,0.000047330064,0.00005276037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028694552,0.000096648015,0.00016797935,0.000030477579,0.000095894495,0.0000071950763,0.00007589771,0.00014518366,0.00027078443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063391315,0.000072609924,0.000021422762,0.00018062549,0.00019945271,0.000092329836,0.00007385673,0.00005700644,0.00002132334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003907999,0.000036374302,0.8922483,0.000007847263,0.0000058853243,2.3682288e-7,0.00006841415,0.000022575165,0.10573182,0.0005917897,0.0011565316,0.00009114524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034171462,0.00025873477,0.98830765,0.000015581261,0.000008979037,0.0000030636245,0.000020089277,0.0007485727,0.009595298,0.00027713634,0.00032908202,0.00009408992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017884343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016869439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096136525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027412329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010252061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29648995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084033836","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.04.002","title":"Hindsight in marine protected area selection: A comparison of ecological representation arising from opportunistic and systematic approaches","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Michigan State University; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Marine protected area; Protected area; Marine reserve; Site selection; Environmental resource management; Marine conservation; Selection (genetic algorithm); Geography; Computer science; Ecology; Environmental science; Habitat; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.2700543091895579,"score_gpt":0.2689001087033072,"score_spread":0.0011542004862507005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084033836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971221,0.000017045886,0.0004954766,0.00009268748,0.000029375065,0.000670926,0.0000024784845,0.000032521653,0.0015373777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99773765,0.0000062310137,0.0020314683,0.000024432893,0.000008084659,0.00012349973,0.000030216266,0.000002439635,0.000035973037],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891394,0.00019443048,0.00043464964,0.00025664805,0.000092155235,0.00010820125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946827,0.00017879921,0.0002267843,0.000079928905,0.000013966732,0.000032260483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022965732,0.00010124456,0.00032381064,0.000028674285,0.000063144034,0.000008936891,0.00006511642,0.00009227888,0.00033520252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034794598,0.00006834785,0.00002332833,0.00020504279,0.0001060058,0.000079202444,0.00018540744,0.000082436825,0.0000062241256],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053096697,0.00016247778,0.9959819,0.00011957735,0.000009680928,0.0000017815669,0.00029286256,0.0000021765657,0.002494558,0.00022307933,0.000023084865,0.000635779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018240901,0.00019884272,0.98824495,0.00007740824,0.000014682487,0.0000026614396,0.000324481,0.00832754,0.0003766641,0.0021547447,0.000008480273,0.00008711648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017659508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012260871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0083253635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052535284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004584083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36702326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087296430","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.023","title":"Forest loss with urbanization predicts bird extirpations in Vancouver","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Geography; Ecology; Urbanization; Habitat; Wildlife; Old-growth forest; Biodiversity; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.01583524214483826,"score_gpt":0.20351850887752992,"score_spread":0.18768326673269167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087296430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927154,0.000008109719,0.0028920078,0.0026843925,0.00006530608,0.0002744381,0.0000020651496,0.000113924034,0.0012443311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948301,0.000009308199,0.0019051328,0.002814331,0.00005109935,0.00007088803,0.00003422258,0.000007933556,0.00027700237],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991596,0.00007775966,0.00021667608,0.0002519286,0.00011570342,0.00017833133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996185,0.000103705956,0.00009332351,0.00012173615,0.00002177707,0.00004096118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000189397,0.00010269081,0.00009685232,0.00003583607,0.00010506272,0.000011230609,0.00010162437,0.00014459004,0.00064932357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014674086,0.000077492245,0.00001579436,0.00040291762,0.0001489074,0.00036027693,0.000040022573,0.00009739115,0.00027036335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005082052,0.00008227212,0.991294,0.0000010751017,0.000002346396,0.0000030448311,0.000052817242,0.0028452724,0.000113909315,0.00062439335,0.0038207087,0.0011093047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036209836,0.000120716875,0.9839867,0.0000067282513,0.0000038379003,0.0000030557571,0.000018280036,0.006318327,0.000035187255,0.00066591334,0.0083663305,0.00011283343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028994703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031673163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031383216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013721592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001867551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9859963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089641749","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.020","title":"Frugal conservation: What does it take to detect changes in fish populations?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"International Development Research Centre; John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation","keywords":"Transect; Species richness; Sampling (signal processing); Ecology; Geography; Coral reef fish; Coral reef; Belt transect; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Resource (disambiguation); Abundance (ecology); Biology","score_opus":0.06297932502043155,"score_gpt":0.26660689185276204,"score_spread":0.2036275668323305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089641749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94377995,0.0000073960773,0.000047603327,0.054637115,0.00057433004,0.00036782472,0.000007507539,0.00005566692,0.00052263023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883386,0.000036243146,0.0012136905,0.009690686,0.00009682069,0.0001328833,0.00003349904,0.0000045722236,0.00045303392],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906635,0.000059712886,0.0002337815,0.00030785028,0.00012610048,0.00020621816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995728,0.00011325859,0.000070794296,0.00015431359,0.000023342707,0.00006544984],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030713825,0.000126817,0.00015650356,0.000038003283,0.00013444453,0.00006498129,0.00013646796,0.000111995054,0.0012187008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039734074,0.000083858766,0.000028696182,0.00029858362,0.00007854144,0.00026582408,0.00020921469,0.00012981515,0.00016141127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028695225,0.000023534336,0.9611856,0.00000391708,0.0000022113406,0.0000024185474,0.00012339794,0.0000024521894,0.018907523,0.0003080332,0.00516991,0.014242323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013452112,0.00008275473,0.89014894,0.0000130525395,0.0000021290898,0.0000020754228,0.00016897629,0.00014126432,0.0005637783,0.0013567754,0.10724795,0.00013778293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014633512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26677653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26531318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049516268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000057674665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090030429","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.026","title":"Erratum to “Specialised woodpeckers and naturalness in hemiboreal forests – deriving quantitative targets for conservation planning” [Biological Conservation 141 (2008) 997–1012]","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalness; Nature Conservation; Geography; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Physics; Particle physics","score_opus":0.08391167312991737,"score_gpt":0.27753592745667965,"score_spread":0.19362425432676228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090030429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9721526,0.0016983511,0.00004449216,0.0190245,0.0033253203,0.0022447694,0.00083377154,0.00019912745,0.0004770893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94614804,0.0026433188,0.0027224128,0.018502606,0.0018706665,0.00094498706,0.022700755,0.000017081456,0.004450119],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962197,0.00041278158,0.0008831009,0.001288627,0.00031383292,0.0008819554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965304,0.0019334067,0.0006075812,0.00012656783,0.00059119344,0.0002108332],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007376863,0.0007194448,0.0011095097,0.00013182877,0.0010233908,0.000111932764,0.00047136462,0.001960256,0.0000600524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029667213,0.00036154987,0.00021791519,0.0007747015,0.0007218184,0.0002950183,0.00031669243,0.00081516005,0.000018504283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001111298,0.0001221032,0.440302,0.00004499794,0.00006549015,0.000029584871,0.00026709054,0.0000023120108,0.0009343886,0.0006136935,0.5560347,0.0004723579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061540114,0.0014320856,0.8353869,0.00017771691,0.000027602297,0.000012316602,0.0005734672,0.0002424602,0.00004963355,0.0013166193,0.15945557,0.0007102725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011850655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011552805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3965791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020935711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001049862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093370829","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.11.019","title":"Effects of tourism-related provisioning on the trophic signatures and movement patterns of an apex predator, the Caribbean reef shark","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Abbott Laboratories","keywords":"Carcharhinus; Apex predator; Trophic level; Ecology; Population; Reef; Fishery; Biology; Coral reef fish; Marine reserve; Coral reef; Marine protected area; Geography; Habitat","score_opus":0.008228380379361395,"score_gpt":0.2081271819140511,"score_spread":0.19989880153468972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093370829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981014,0.000016807677,0.000014084726,0.0012243832,0.00008719548,0.00039483645,0.0000049385335,0.000011869851,0.00014445277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876285,0.000009503914,0.0000545923,0.0010825652,0.00001593371,0.000024170185,0.000015571062,0.0000025343782,0.000032297867],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923795,0.00024208377,0.00016608908,0.00017489595,0.00007378136,0.00010516859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992047,0.00048237992,0.0001152833,0.00016501361,0.000010580961,0.000022057196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040259043,0.000082536935,0.00010441351,0.000009968783,0.00010172377,0.0000043646446,0.00018134918,0.00017668556,0.00021783389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003119081,0.000036779624,0.0000247231,0.000054123728,0.0003157098,0.000033370576,0.00013713063,0.00022016412,0.0000037021236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011906001,0.00010623712,0.33149973,0.000008753431,0.000016473654,0.0000019011503,0.00015167559,0.0000118845355,0.6586338,0.005364014,0.000120556535,0.00396587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018482175,0.00064997794,0.9651124,0.000006367647,0.000009218541,9.040467e-7,0.000022557255,0.0004522985,0.031594284,0.0016480502,0.00026861895,0.00005049217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003477973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012027124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6336127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000066947814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000046807304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23851283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094838438","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2004.12.004","title":"Dynamics of threatened goldenseal populations and implications for recovery","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Parks Canada","funders":"University of Ottawa; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Threatened species; Population; Biological dispersal; Perennial plant; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Seed dispersal; Vital rates; Population size; Woodland caribou; Range (aeronautics); Population growth; Demography","score_opus":0.0636559892076516,"score_gpt":0.29158514007298614,"score_spread":0.22792915086533455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094838438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9721682,0.00003092608,0.01176654,0.014944609,0.00002448771,0.00022095325,0.000045009325,0.000020316136,0.00077896006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98399043,0.000051317526,0.015128072,0.0004892049,0.000011427751,0.00005434723,0.00011241913,0.000002228076,0.00016053786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995856,0.000021531429,0.00015988624,0.00013051534,0.000022174594,0.00008024453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965596,0.00016008069,0.000078323086,0.000064645144,0.000021554792,0.000019426461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011783422,0.000050770883,0.00008220737,0.000013923991,0.00013376403,0.0000038965754,0.00004285869,0.00007127796,0.00004353864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013364133,0.000041569907,0.000025154914,0.00006975497,0.0001524728,0.00007669103,0.000038232447,0.000025066021,0.000006124775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001893711,0.000029955932,0.93224263,0.0000020932043,0.000005460372,1.2967427e-8,0.000019422629,0.00026314962,0.0010314477,0.0605067,0.0002570562,0.0056231013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001340244,0.00008115954,0.9405042,0.0000012894075,0.0000076190863,9.977634e-7,0.000013621434,0.008532991,0.000019466795,0.05038728,0.00026841732,0.000048916583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030141255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018476784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014455404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048127346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000037241505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16951716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095043715","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.029","title":"Effectiveness of above-ground pipeline mitigation for moose (Alces alces) and other large mammals","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Shell Canada","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Pipeline (software); Environmental science; Habitat; Geology; Ecology; Biology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03270816617505556,"score_gpt":0.25781978250008575,"score_spread":0.22511161632503018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095043715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934043,0.000051179886,0.0052656555,0.0003994211,0.000057800527,0.0004896785,0.00003447605,0.000029971241,0.0002675093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759,0.00002476549,0.0009766639,0.0011146583,0.000026198873,0.000089827416,0.000063213054,0.000005158241,0.00010949386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991102,0.0001954077,0.00022601055,0.00024004358,0.000079387166,0.00014895269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909526,0.0006144229,0.00013667966,0.00009033652,0.000029322224,0.000034002478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006916527,0.00009938923,0.00016220688,0.000020470512,0.00016410749,0.0000054890634,0.00007268617,0.0001606057,0.00017849986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030765138,0.000078922436,0.00003882111,0.00011992634,0.00026973896,0.00015758918,0.00004202373,0.000046246525,0.000018528937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002166454,0.00007907174,0.9773071,0.000020965555,0.0000073276256,5.644084e-7,0.000050037423,0.000011942661,0.019295383,0.0022711146,0.000388679,0.00035119907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006992819,0.00018858799,0.9880854,0.000013295905,0.0000087451845,0.0000051925354,0.000021341293,0.0012015816,0.003099892,0.0032040598,0.00337178,0.00010082612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012986176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000061512736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016195493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028583334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010114689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32183635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095774070","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2007.03.018","title":"Constraints and reinforcement on adaptation under climate change: Selection of genetically correlated traits","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Population; Trait; Environmental change; Lag; Selection (genetic algorithm); Extinction (optical mineralogy); Frequency-dependent selection; Ecology; Genetic load; Adaptation (eye); Environmental gradient; Population size; Biology; Evolutionary biology; Habitat; Computer science; Demography","score_opus":0.10273070186004059,"score_gpt":0.26852816749157893,"score_spread":0.16579746563153835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095774070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998435,0.000027977623,0.00034146226,0.000518339,0.00006296379,0.00029616634,0.000009119553,0.000045841967,0.000263085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991998,0.00009849972,0.00016563981,0.00035357787,0.000088510846,0.00000888276,0.00006901755,5.8244046e-7,0.000015509911],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991966,0.0000460829,0.0002544716,0.00022645369,0.00011386572,0.00016254459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995995,0.00010689862,0.00011731657,0.000018342347,0.00010907447,0.000048859187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037690107,0.00009212201,0.000107002794,0.000015295987,0.00010842237,0.000010090601,0.00003587531,0.00015761526,0.00013195988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005130218,0.0000373704,0.000031221716,0.00018600766,0.00013602427,0.000056632754,0.000015097973,0.00007694889,0.000005629436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003224513,0.00007890438,0.050177395,0.0000043726877,0.0000055631667,6.3794164e-7,0.00004737806,0.000012905851,0.7030282,0.007835212,0.0000118305625,0.23847514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013781995,0.0011687853,0.9906466,0.000015939175,0.000009331678,0.000005407346,0.00020304929,0.00037885323,0.007002888,0.00017335668,0.00016740045,0.00009057875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000064742846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007485167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9404692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018113335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000031602392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15239206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096787453","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00145-3","title":"Integrity and isolation of Costa Rica's national parks and biological reserves: examining the dynamics of land-cover change","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":246,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Protected area; Deforestation (computer science); Nature reserve; Geography; Forest cover; National park; Buffer zone; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Agroforestry; Ecology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.15870309509791317,"score_gpt":0.24929655615547078,"score_spread":0.09059346105755761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096787453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957018,0.00009912483,0.00027195073,0.002643486,0.000020429909,0.00022856021,0.0000289384,0.000012211143,0.0009934958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988157,0.0003039658,0.00034787634,0.00041256912,0.000014862881,0.00000814861,0.000041225878,0.0000014814937,0.00005414574],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922115,0.00014387869,0.00019473684,0.00018802045,0.00016133727,0.00009088198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999441,0.00026565272,0.00014762206,0.0000822489,0.000037046062,0.000026390542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051188713,0.00008001401,0.00011465202,0.000026873278,0.00012458941,0.000013078869,0.000105192725,0.000107748645,0.00027977562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029539075,0.000048123675,0.00002073341,0.00016570516,0.0004525002,0.00008918045,0.00022666571,0.00009614685,0.0000046286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025338022,0.00004012682,0.9968373,0.000006541162,0.0000070520955,2.0742006e-7,0.00022497219,0.0000063164007,0.00047448816,0.0003158275,0.00016937578,0.001892421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019396523,0.0001457043,0.96922725,0.000008559371,0.0000064804353,9.974913e-7,0.00018083569,0.028554073,0.000013613303,0.00042997507,0.0011759253,0.00006264542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005793793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013410786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028547756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000415913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000021441908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30633467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097606878","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.048","title":"Patterns of gastrointestinal bacterial exchange between chimpanzees and humans involved in research and tourism in western Uganda","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Morris Animal Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Antibiotic resistance; Transmission (telecommunications); Zoology; Antibiotics; National park; Bacteria; Ecology; Microbiology; Genetics","score_opus":0.23451604995907335,"score_gpt":0.39452834346282845,"score_spread":0.1600122935037551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097606878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991211,0.000047175476,0.000014383017,0.00034226093,0.000042217027,0.00021920851,0.00003349311,0.000012889968,0.00016722422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961007,0.000013008635,0.000056723882,0.000034505672,0.00008681861,0.00003682821,0.00010773399,0.000004121369,0.00005020879],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988245,0.0002887489,0.00031195517,0.0002486482,0.000059670107,0.00026649426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948764,0.0002877167,0.00006453992,0.00009209591,0.000037140962,0.000030889125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062094664,0.00008764111,0.00022453553,0.00015868113,0.00003091993,0.000013562054,0.00007532413,0.00014839075,0.00014980897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053058196,0.00007403952,0.000011437904,0.000099442994,0.0001439856,0.000047400463,0.0000709282,0.00018183351,0.000003364606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001252251,0.000104656276,0.98518246,0.000013061019,0.000001266568,0.000021947306,0.00014162339,2.3148294e-8,0.013631426,0.00032186753,0.000048461225,0.00040800753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009826986,0.0005859052,0.99709344,0.000031199415,0.000002052354,0.000006420543,0.00011390131,0.0000011617491,0.00017449999,0.0008094585,0.00013186038,0.000067374225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041919397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068816957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013456926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026347694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009950319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63369864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099102379","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2012.10.014","title":"The genetic legacy of Lonesome George survives: Giant tortoises with Pinta Island ancestry identified in Galápagos","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Park Service; National Geographic Society; Yale University","keywords":"Tortoise; Archipelago; Biology; Hybrid; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Zoology; Purebred; Ecology; Geography; Breed; Paleontology","score_opus":0.09821351497354902,"score_gpt":0.3337638058434403,"score_spread":0.23555029086989127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099102379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972086,0.0006833774,0.00012620246,0.0003007499,0.0004141957,0.00025299814,0.000011105857,0.00002461386,0.0009781631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99929017,0.0000837902,0.000074338204,0.00019039294,0.000057309615,0.00007600532,0.000027905533,0.000006547154,0.00019356028],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988189,0.0002473868,0.0003302284,0.00018923893,0.00007551536,0.00033873646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992141,0.0003001753,0.00015268926,0.00023782396,0.000049829887,0.00004537882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004034666,0.000112646,0.00019911982,0.000040189378,0.000075945616,0.0000177492,0.00017389539,0.00016424575,0.0003404665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082920415,0.000064916254,0.000032108645,0.00015341151,0.00023406498,0.00011930535,0.000040990497,0.0001175361,0.00004951554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002222967,0.00017200282,0.9883906,0.000005708359,0.000012935185,0.000006199186,0.00021362648,6.572772e-7,0.0071834624,0.0025109802,0.00032283794,0.0009586915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004422364,0.00018363142,0.99682903,0.00000781292,0.000010461776,0.000016030497,0.0004712085,0.0000058371343,0.00031340375,0.00016728445,0.0014549983,0.00009804743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006347332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001106756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008438446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025795163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002398083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37278697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103807119","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.03.020","title":"Rockfish (Sebastes) that are evolutionarily isolated are also large, morphologically distinctive and vulnerable to overfishing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Overfishing; Biology; Sebastes; Rockfish; Ecology; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Zoology; Fishery; Fishing; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.029118040762624923,"score_gpt":0.24469914247403282,"score_spread":0.2155811017114079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103807119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98687685,0.00017558732,0.009540657,0.002595146,0.000080115155,0.00022793775,0.00011317279,0.000035808975,0.00035471373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99059725,0.00003671097,0.0011728235,0.0074090185,0.00008937337,0.000006017942,0.00036757052,0.000004313828,0.0003169341],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989265,0.00013895586,0.00016189364,0.000427168,0.00011326383,0.00023218182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939793,0.000032125346,0.00014141056,0.00016017532,0.00015621682,0.00011213223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018907664,0.00016326483,0.00017023824,0.00003098191,0.00028950674,0.00005115309,0.00012722446,0.00030754702,0.00006966206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044842777,0.00013540078,0.00004881107,0.00012319772,0.00004181711,0.000011134218,0.00011030522,0.00013202718,0.000009065268],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005645424,0.00010709392,0.8863666,0.000007681042,0.000036539943,0.000011290621,0.000073875606,0.00030000703,0.09504641,0.00072583696,0.015674958,0.0010851516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004094193,0.00040676998,0.97520745,0.000013706379,0.000010209602,0.00001180126,0.00019478775,0.00017948117,0.0011489014,0.00073933817,0.021471864,0.00020624477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000174886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004187506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09389751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016468997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014540592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55214834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105015789","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2007.02.022","title":"Spatial organization and food habits of jaguars (Panthera onca) in a floodplain forest","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Jaguar; Territoriality; Panthera; Carnivore; Predation; Population; Geography; Ecology; Home range; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Apex predator; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.017842278455883237,"score_gpt":0.21162415078660868,"score_spread":0.19378187233072544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105015789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995204,0.000013678249,0.0035112798,0.0006805771,0.0000475348,0.0002017875,0.000002767818,0.000021436297,0.00031694214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986358,0.000012300629,0.0005911219,0.00068658654,0.00001762057,0.000004822287,0.00003401923,0.000003996158,0.000013714714],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926925,0.00006979234,0.0002579497,0.0001838323,0.000080204336,0.00013900336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956954,0.00020413488,0.00010435834,0.00007213538,0.000018898863,0.000030922038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049572013,0.00007722053,0.00011084088,0.000036005786,0.00005581838,0.0000049996165,0.00006783034,0.00016407296,0.00020160129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004355608,0.000065914275,0.000011922881,0.00030110835,0.00016731741,0.00010710628,0.000052151772,0.00006962828,0.0000152318],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038071088,0.000054025637,0.99054277,0.0000026426974,0.0000026595046,0.0000011111915,0.00009036338,0.000018613528,0.0057179453,0.00089484,0.000059493046,0.0025774466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035304902,0.00025585527,0.9962689,0.0000060820616,0.0000028626855,0.0000033335375,0.000041163872,0.0004910547,0.0011952835,0.0011061482,0.00019832267,0.00007793606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038630207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061931117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058068093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004409187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010323866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34559017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107031970","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.026","title":"Relaxed selection for tick-defense grooming in Père David’s deer?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Vector-borne infectious diseases","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Cegep de Saint Hyacinthe","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Captivity; Biology; Tick infestation; Tick; Population; Predation; Zoology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ecology; Poaching; Wildlife; Demography","score_opus":0.03366244174689214,"score_gpt":0.25763307101054067,"score_spread":0.22397062926364852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107031970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99198145,0.0002163247,0.005844235,0.00063677906,0.0003643783,0.00045227562,0.000013002719,0.0001911143,0.0003004527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980196,0.00001381095,0.00036108145,0.00090606743,0.00006666037,0.00015229857,0.00025979738,0.000010814543,0.0002098826],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987396,0.00032693936,0.00029819188,0.00033036573,0.000019898484,0.00028501486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892974,0.00070477405,0.00011536501,0.00012346591,0.00010696367,0.00001967918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043349198,0.00014607128,0.00021974985,0.00009300821,0.00015137783,0.000014509156,0.000092608556,0.00036552642,0.00013631188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017992188,0.00012210329,0.000079885205,0.00018055542,0.00009676871,0.00007975492,0.000028965014,0.00016074753,0.00013369566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045479793,0.00017863017,0.6579214,0.000018358005,0.000034178298,4.97911e-7,0.00006192391,0.000019421916,0.32204685,0.011198616,0.0026471813,0.005418194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028209365,0.0010756685,0.89372987,0.00003939475,0.00004450339,0.00003439125,0.000056919573,0.00090968877,0.015115132,0.0050239977,0.08076346,0.00038604782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018498463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035701576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3069317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082543535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034548153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49792275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108271627","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.06.019","title":"Impacts of insect herbivores on rare plant populations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Herbivore; Biology; Insect; Plant tolerance to herbivory; Population; Ecology; Predation; Vital rates; Rare species; Fecundity; Endangered species; Population size; Habitat; Population growth","score_opus":0.38336119202684954,"score_gpt":0.25155402997585213,"score_spread":0.1318071620509974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108271627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978952,0.00009134172,7.336404e-7,0.00030586732,0.000030849125,0.00009597801,0.00010782497,0.00004616175,0.0014260426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993597,0.000047164373,0.00007227191,0.0003518651,0.00005045881,0.000006279475,0.00009740915,2.6412317e-7,0.000014543102],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947006,0.00004807542,0.0001586333,0.00012933704,0.000071643786,0.0001222505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997057,0.00012359844,0.000083352505,0.000015017892,0.000037827092,0.000034523462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008806478,0.00008211143,0.00012435122,0.000007700577,0.000104984545,0.0000060694792,0.00008882421,0.00007572691,0.00019570078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000116146344,0.000025671698,0.000050319384,0.00012873375,0.000051059564,0.000039441744,0.00002682321,0.000046746012,0.000016859234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015569862,0.00008350193,0.8572633,0.000002655118,0.0000066786033,0.0000023650034,0.00004882426,6.822065e-8,0.13441356,0.005664294,0.000610529,0.001748522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005264175,0.0006183878,0.9926111,0.00001919694,0.0000029593912,0.0000016984108,0.000065090266,0.0000070621063,0.004003911,0.0013540381,0.0011887645,0.000075128766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010343929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027305798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13534781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006549937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000023877915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21427862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108627892","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.08.032","title":"Integrating accessibility and intactness into large-area conservation planning in the Canadian boreal forest","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; Natural Resources Canada; University of Victoria; Canadian Forest Service; University of British Columbia","funders":"Nature Conservancy","keywords":"Boreal; Biodiversity; Taiga; Nature reserve; Ecology; Geography; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.04818834345021094,"score_gpt":0.2832179260537468,"score_spread":0.23502958260353585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108627892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98003745,0.0000104964265,0.00007980894,0.0063697207,0.000026797154,0.0004061946,0.000001743569,0.000019723475,0.013048056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937963,0.0000033896647,0.00031821057,0.0056367833,0.000018813937,0.00007961989,0.00009687471,0.0000028513316,0.000047154615],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913055,0.0001364778,0.00019712151,0.00020899573,0.00010020672,0.00022666626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995679,0.00016607498,0.00006578598,0.00012664436,0.000012907766,0.000060689348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006163059,0.00010062809,0.00008709788,0.000041591902,0.00024380727,0.00013526634,0.00019272459,0.000099350524,0.00034159294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032638726,0.000061088285,0.000015273055,0.00025969656,0.00016175272,0.00035643627,0.00009065481,0.00013661369,0.000066250446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005207196,0.000012469453,0.9901464,0.000003370844,0.0000012000969,0.0000014288954,0.0005680358,0.000005911718,0.00006229834,0.0032228115,0.003822064,0.0021488091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013194844,0.00003854456,0.97480786,0.000009067854,0.0000017661087,8.215966e-7,0.0002373104,0.012819818,0.0000035908192,0.00615979,0.0057044234,0.00008508204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61092335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78203464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1711113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012365151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017942135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39166754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111871000","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2004.02.020","title":"Modelling the spatial distribution of human-caused grizzly bear mortalities in the Central Rockies ecosystem of Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":232,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"AXYS Technologies (Canada); Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; Parks Canada; University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Geography; Ecosystem; Terrain; Vegetation (pathology); Distribution (mathematics); Logistic regression; Spatial distribution; Ecology; Physical geography; Demography; Biology; Ursus; Population; Cartography","score_opus":0.03509389667473245,"score_gpt":0.21567020825177163,"score_spread":0.18057631157703918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111871000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99587804,0.000011434172,0.0015616165,0.0021177074,0.00005266065,0.00022406178,0.000035568657,0.0000059410863,0.000112955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953514,0.0000051857787,0.000018632218,0.00030765613,0.000018208926,0.000018900391,0.00008667071,0.0000015725013,0.000008031244],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912155,0.0001613969,0.00030015496,0.00011332857,0.00015498712,0.00014858888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995585,0.00014244473,0.00015603294,0.00011273139,0.00001654049,0.0000137173865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035953653,0.000070694914,0.000109990404,0.000006524337,0.00013869756,0.0000055222245,0.0001724503,0.00007390641,0.000041520572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000754784,0.000040151474,0.000028134347,0.00012751496,0.00014360162,0.000065738226,0.00002896348,0.00007867711,0.0000011253434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024663734,0.000043152155,0.9421882,0.0000074107156,0.000006089598,0.0000011857819,0.0003449184,0.04918087,0.00069305464,0.007319536,0.00016650485,0.000024436848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018483365,0.00006812355,0.9917906,0.000011267173,0.0000056324284,9.0996474e-7,0.000474438,0.0036785987,0.00043726224,0.0031628401,0.00013505573,0.000050444996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38599673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5447954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15879868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012841672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006332082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.618092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113270774","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2007.09.003","title":"Where can tigers persist in the future? A landscape-scale, density-based population model for the Indian subcontinent","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Minnesota; James S. McDonnell Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Tiger; Panthera; Population; Geography; Wildlife conservation; Ecology; Wildlife; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology; Predation; Demography","score_opus":0.02096425022697257,"score_gpt":0.23091369173932189,"score_spread":0.20994944151234932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113270774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96446633,0.000032625918,0.0056702034,0.029072724,0.00009226727,0.0005564918,0.0000062959584,0.000022396836,0.000080681086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98870623,0.000009909673,0.000628175,0.010311042,0.000078422854,0.00010291131,0.00011138315,0.000003868776,0.000048042482],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913925,0.000100163365,0.00021300573,0.00020931152,0.00012170922,0.00021653283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992948,0.0004090296,0.0000978086,0.00015340735,0.000016019138,0.000028925311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012021776,0.00010179258,0.00009163318,0.000024843239,0.0003045951,0.000022387372,0.00019146671,0.00016603102,0.000066262386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082719635,0.000056742363,0.00005889254,0.00021637065,0.000103300226,0.00006532657,0.000021011083,0.00012808925,0.000009439288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011503084,0.00003677616,0.9948217,0.000002864427,0.0000026308164,0.0000010675634,0.00036121265,0.0010834088,0.00011713639,0.00029283165,0.0019977451,0.0011675913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031050926,0.000048758528,0.9475507,0.0000034379464,0.0000084528065,0.0000013820429,0.0005744025,0.049487837,0.000011914367,0.00046450266,0.0014529517,0.00008513109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057555264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05091719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050341636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007839919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014908085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9664011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113326205","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2003.07.005","title":"Density and population size estimates for North Cascade grizzly bears using DNA hair-sampling techniques","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Threatened species; Population; Geography; Population density; Distance sampling; Population size; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Demography; Ursus; Habitat","score_opus":0.056873615069588,"score_gpt":0.27601298354526466,"score_spread":0.21913936847567667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113326205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99008864,0.000015813615,0.008956138,0.00034182525,0.000054667235,0.00040818923,0.0000056236504,0.000087456574,0.000041643016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433226,0.0000065769123,0.055380136,0.001167883,0.00001591484,0.000033823024,0.00005260693,0.000005521445,0.000014916405],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991973,0.000077231,0.0002070427,0.00027790063,0.00006552892,0.00017500941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993045,0.00043379285,0.00011275621,0.00008553352,0.00002062535,0.00004283445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003349182,0.0001135784,0.00013371598,0.000016004924,0.00031254094,0.000022231161,0.00005116951,0.00017184314,0.000051626765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001119499,0.00009772798,0.000030115356,0.00012025553,0.00012154275,0.00018922916,0.000034188215,0.000068478395,0.000004539915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024649436,0.00001870686,0.98212844,0.000004159387,0.0000041051703,4.2906703e-7,0.000016003818,0.00003487694,0.01642786,0.00047548334,0.000068379384,0.00079690776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012792533,0.000080520826,0.98966783,0.0000058538976,0.000014341934,0.00000901456,0.000012360635,0.0018709061,0.0026033728,0.0048616678,0.00061514217,0.0001310346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033942043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036888116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04676602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007697275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009464956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39852312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113645250","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2008.05.016","title":"Protecting the African elephant: A dynamic bioeconomic model of ivory trade","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"African elephant; Tourism; Natural resource economics; Economics; Business; International trade; Wildlife trade; Geography; Ecology; Wildlife; Biology","score_opus":0.048619204758837874,"score_gpt":0.2209492395953301,"score_spread":0.17233003483649223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113645250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931301,0.000015874106,0.0014879667,0.004247704,0.00003182035,0.0003130936,0.0000042271445,0.000038526483,0.0007307083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975043,0.000021540232,0.00075361884,0.0015512363,0.000010420566,0.000060679195,0.00000745222,0.000003914015,0.000086829205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991632,0.00017722811,0.00024421338,0.00019955744,0.000066047,0.00014974136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999445,0.00021957462,0.00016147763,0.0001433793,0.000005483393,0.00002506346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044832996,0.00008781961,0.00011563239,0.000015713525,0.0003446746,0.0000035899807,0.00017567925,0.0001114128,0.00014764021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019273836,0.00005753889,0.00004805363,0.00013251274,0.00045224073,0.00010080625,0.000057980513,0.0001614333,0.00004330864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009151598,0.000086709944,0.94463056,0.0000041457424,0.000012165389,0.0000012580747,0.00057409465,0.002141061,0.049516473,0.00051599613,0.00053976657,0.0018862378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015262557,0.000091804206,0.89927906,0.0000026475282,0.0000044619464,0.000008445647,0.00009121036,0.09782551,0.00055200467,0.0016204359,0.00028480013,0.00008699155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012261458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011997225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095684454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063429085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002235972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26509932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114280848","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.07.001","title":"Corrigendum to “Predicting survival, reproduction and abundance of polar bears under climate change” [Biol. Conserv. 143 (2010) 1612–1622]","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Biology; Reproduction; Polar; Climate change; Ecology; Zoology; Geography; Physics; Astronomy","score_opus":0.11111925890350928,"score_gpt":0.2728933814442639,"score_spread":0.16177412254075463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114280848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9264434,0.0047488064,0.00039940525,0.011306452,0.032511182,0.0033658016,0.00048067985,0.00041842338,0.020325882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8405502,0.053509735,0.0064390767,0.03268494,0.008562316,0.0010799292,0.0033060613,0.00035370718,0.053514034],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689806,0.00032707994,0.0006982812,0.0011592922,0.00039774927,0.00051951694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984286,0.00013220374,0.0006409604,0.00055332464,0.000091490394,0.00015344894],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013550606,0.00042760803,0.0007319069,0.000057152272,0.0003057664,0.00003991574,0.00034147242,0.0005624251,0.0006099262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009304257,0.00035867613,0.00010923516,0.00038355874,0.0004511001,0.00015268284,0.0010446109,0.00048289972,0.00015429125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013116255,0.00007820846,0.658316,0.0002177456,0.000047689555,0.000003082229,0.00011695825,0.000002767241,0.0010887465,0.00040938458,0.331082,0.008506285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013302856,0.00036439477,0.6667026,0.000111580215,0.0000291385,0.0000049709915,0.00005725492,0.00011706739,0.00002515142,0.00018109647,0.33196875,0.00030491588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012371292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047687837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08589317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017384575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019819669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117997267","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.02.018","title":"A review of lead poisoning from ammunition sources in terrestrial birds","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":359,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Ammunition; Lead poisoning; Threatened species; Shot (pellet); Lead (geology); Near-threatened species; Geography; Wildlife; Ecology; Fishery; Habitat; Biology; Medicine; Archaeology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.179232177485843,"score_gpt":0.3569859266056125,"score_spread":0.17775374911976952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117997267","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008679492,0.9897399,0.000018891387,0.00008758169,0.00007758066,0.0005069051,0.000048958038,0.000025133062,0.00081558333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00033851602,0.9981134,0.00019923362,0.0003703885,0.000064580134,0.00006891236,0.0008090372,0.000007273494,0.000028656214],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829966,0.00043297195,0.0007509481,0.00023228461,0.00013868573,0.000145476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988697,0.00041585893,0.00053120183,0.00015502187,0.000006019203,0.000022175178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004165576,0.0002066366,0.00088882586,0.000045874214,0.000047115955,0.000009886394,0.00016573114,0.00021290418,0.0003113781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047037346,0.0001383475,0.00017664985,0.00036159463,0.00017319479,0.000077844015,0.00010115689,0.00017299749,0.0000878708],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010974706,0.00007440409,0.011361021,0.0043644863,0.000026412796,0.000002248451,0.00004026852,5.1832234e-7,0.000074151336,0.000017251727,0.0077236095,0.97630465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012768578,0.000050510687,0.0051837596,0.03076934,0.00007959238,0.0000012223824,0.000012645807,0.000004172234,0.000005155132,0.0001363608,0.9634454,0.00018415543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028433579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020776548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9761205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009577307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023407729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56416476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119541874","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.04.014","title":"Predatory fish invaders: Insights from Indo-Pacific lionfish in the western Atlantic and Caribbean","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine Ecology and Invasive Species","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":251,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Queensland; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Ecology; Predation; Introduced species; Invasive species; Fishery; Biology; Overfishing; Trophic cascade; Habitat; Predator; Geography; Fishing","score_opus":0.029297820991377305,"score_gpt":0.20180729621699206,"score_spread":0.17250947522561474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119541874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903874,0.00001639648,0.000006540677,0.005405925,0.000046902675,0.00030101914,0.0000031257905,0.000018066472,0.0038146712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935374,0.00004287667,0.000043189586,0.006101615,0.000031475898,0.000053970816,0.00006133871,0.0000021000071,0.00012602912],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992258,0.00020062891,0.00015449832,0.00022007246,0.0000771525,0.00012187133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994961,0.00028673478,0.000052139385,0.00012844396,0.0000072268813,0.00002933946],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010962107,0.000086534026,0.0000979047,0.000017669501,0.000091936396,0.000047860507,0.00016236995,0.0001333167,0.001294043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001438842,0.000051493917,0.000015813695,0.00010745058,0.00031613553,0.00023148255,0.0001182158,0.00014004637,0.00017626824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005589232,0.000028778075,0.9875343,0.0000012321797,0.000002422814,0.0000022718739,0.00035347513,5.603167e-7,0.0011489601,0.00012512213,0.010528799,0.00026851927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001647416,0.00007384681,0.9777848,0.0000037084853,0.0000020862037,0.000001679599,0.00043851402,0.00006851825,0.00006205215,0.0022170176,0.019106492,0.000076556425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038240782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005290029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009749484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025140454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000045005672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119651215","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.009","title":"Assessing critical habitat: Evaluating the relative contribution of habitats to population persistence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Population; Ecology; Population viability analysis; Habitat destruction; Biology; Geography; Endangered species; Demography","score_opus":0.09759210132118731,"score_gpt":0.35378576903958203,"score_spread":0.2561936677183947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119651215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828853,0.000006275455,0.0044458094,0.011601414,0.00024225563,0.00033628687,0.0000027774106,0.00003314345,0.00044671432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99077517,5.506215e-7,0.0071575195,0.0019271576,0.000039188144,0.000043939912,0.00003200167,0.0000035451455,0.000020953537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871546,0.00031938418,0.00031856028,0.00025930483,0.00020458916,0.00018268167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981103,0.0014218544,0.00014661497,0.00016439879,0.000103881954,0.00005296863],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013790744,0.00009765293,0.00012823007,0.000021675725,0.0003626465,0.000033594188,0.00015183655,0.00017215802,0.0002974105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009124087,0.00006668213,0.000052086212,0.00028445022,0.0003510785,0.00048809376,0.00008578095,0.00022987451,0.000078831654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000432377,0.000032592376,0.9168253,0.0000015029061,0.000003396757,3.0722958e-7,0.00008434376,0.00004049429,0.06981974,0.010864309,0.0001235916,0.0021611978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012443819,0.00025001183,0.9843664,0.000010451394,0.000013967746,0.0000032447006,0.000073447416,0.0046945587,0.00040545617,0.00986151,0.00010628852,0.00009023522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014546802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033300443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06941428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059098413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017315608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121589741","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2012.05.017","title":"Conservation genomics in perspective: A holistic approach to understanding Canis evolution in North America","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Evolutionary biology; Conservation genetics; Genomics; Endangered species; Population genomics; Genome; Canis; Geography; Ecology; Genetics; Microsatellite","score_opus":0.09146000874589812,"score_gpt":0.2822155564207717,"score_spread":0.19075554767487357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121589741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8837335,0.00022836754,0.11408533,0.0003792378,0.000086839056,0.00036531588,0.00001562997,0.000010875428,0.0010948954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98654234,0.000016704687,0.012077538,0.00096542126,0.00011922564,0.00006227057,0.00018102012,0.00000848828,0.000026971846],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989872,0.0001314539,0.00022847884,0.0002905873,0.000071717026,0.0002905878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996343,0.000033276716,0.00006657431,0.00014393413,0.000041536896,0.00008032897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019146335,0.00013173863,0.0001371242,0.00007903824,0.000051424537,0.0000117477675,0.00010784243,0.00015340354,0.000005670408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025506032,0.00012357152,0.000029747427,0.00032140984,0.00008336967,0.000008163643,0.000054186832,0.000098381905,0.0000070562046],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019330216,0.00025465293,0.898992,0.000009955661,0.000011047754,1.8471201e-7,0.00074820453,0.0015161559,0.01495989,0.0829152,0.00025121012,0.00014818284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032952608,0.00019916595,0.9932341,0.0000049341734,0.0000043688588,0.0000026509385,0.0016507104,0.00023420237,0.00009774269,0.002750089,0.0013138762,0.00017861924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000671937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007442774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102808855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003454106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007951502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50391006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121932776","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.019","title":"Contrasting recreational and commercial fishing: Searching for common issues to promote unified conservation of fisheries resources and aquatic environments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":561,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Research Council Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts","keywords":"Fishing; Fishery; Fisheries management; Bycatch; Fisheries law; Recreational fishing; Recreation; Fish stock; Fisheries science; Business; Sustainability; Commercial fishing; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.05403444744815188,"score_gpt":0.2736948205139103,"score_spread":0.21966037306575842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121932776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9737991,0.00003138781,0.00090645946,0.024288265,0.0000146744915,0.0005374895,0.000006644364,0.000017069204,0.00039887507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98828113,0.000067166504,0.00838172,0.0029531377,0.00002465195,0.000060447284,0.00003891847,0.000003854055,0.00018896481],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926597,0.00008919028,0.00022025767,0.00020307771,0.000088984874,0.0001325328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938464,0.00041698216,0.00010143797,0.000057117006,0.000003887215,0.000035933157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047320468,0.00009025656,0.00015612638,0.00002169929,0.00026399762,0.000021378335,0.00006352431,0.000064787026,0.000036642683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047335896,0.00007712704,0.000013237661,0.000057067155,0.00027754623,0.00015985759,0.0001386114,0.00005088258,0.0000029687844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014175537,0.000042941945,0.9789753,0.000011829253,0.000016890926,1.8536093e-7,0.000716028,0.000011326283,0.0036124825,0.00035700834,0.0038739154,0.012240335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032404123,0.00024975074,0.9528787,0.000021487227,0.000012251991,4.850973e-7,0.00013792855,0.0029531266,0.000343401,0.0012409121,0.041750647,0.0000872439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002247898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001276484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03787673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027813745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000020318005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31451494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124671064","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.017","title":"Protection from harvesting restores the natural social structure of eastern wolf packs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Threatened species; National park; Geography; Kinship; Population; Ecology; Protected area; Population density; Demography; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.03416458429634046,"score_gpt":0.23640160002922728,"score_spread":0.20223701573288683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124671064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920152,0.000013402964,0.0005565769,0.0068751955,0.000112350775,0.00021566804,0.0000067616193,0.00003685873,0.00016798616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99726677,0.0000010050812,0.00024943423,0.0022642857,0.000105750325,0.000005685769,0.00003653721,0.0000020335485,0.00006847374],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992363,0.000173194,0.00018777177,0.00017689266,0.00011126234,0.000114576986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996133,0.00009946201,0.0001682571,0.00008884401,0.000014880715,0.000015270494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013354402,0.00008426982,0.00009428557,0.000009841014,0.00023450109,0.00001497709,0.00013260043,0.00015098488,0.00021793065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024924887,0.00005198165,0.00003440023,0.00014075608,0.00019432801,0.0001390846,0.000035668185,0.00016730887,0.000017111535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008227466,0.000018896471,0.89920914,7.534401e-7,0.000004817945,3.732778e-7,0.00015886406,0.000014167017,0.092593946,0.00067628844,0.0006523771,0.0065880795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012749257,0.0000893442,0.98301214,0.0000040447603,0.000005481102,0.0000010189708,0.0000386974,0.0007937954,0.00058733876,0.01477878,0.0004946591,0.000067198125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075136725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004972526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09200661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053304713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008273736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23861878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126037208","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.003","title":"Effectiveness of five small Philippines’ coral reef reserves for fish populations depends on site-specific factors, particularly enforcement history","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Marine reserve; Marine protected area; Fishing; Coral reef; Fishery; Coral reef fish; Nature reserve; Trophic cascade; Ecology; Protected area; Geography; Biology; Predation; Habitat; Predator","score_opus":0.1377762037787545,"score_gpt":0.2733279512056455,"score_spread":0.13555174742689102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126037208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99680537,0.000045595338,0.0011859093,0.00009845908,0.00024769534,0.000717327,0.000029732253,0.00003600618,0.0008339317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998789,0.000009537046,0.0002888443,0.0000742902,0.000031591673,0.00010197733,0.00022985939,0.000005112587,0.00046975075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899143,0.000100002595,0.00030829723,0.00027271343,0.00012686968,0.00020068722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991089,0.00050230423,0.00014417214,0.00014867575,0.000046122597,0.000049800587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064662483,0.00013174996,0.00020267599,0.000030282947,0.0001113063,0.00000621164,0.00009987093,0.00008531845,0.00020388966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027257204,0.00009488245,0.00009020389,0.00009943088,0.00010369795,0.0000619514,0.00010753951,0.000057641068,0.0000113037995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050473044,0.00013854785,0.9686336,0.000039687828,0.000011930128,0.0000013576582,0.000115862626,0.000039229897,0.023785258,0.0029660866,0.0029854435,0.00077829324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036069663,0.00053961325,0.95891356,0.000024699924,0.000007988364,3.2489612e-7,0.000052491163,0.000116342424,0.0020500226,0.00046458063,0.037346486,0.00012320477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009238845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011634405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034361046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031457227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006583942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3869194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126476059","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.011","title":"Patterns of dispersal of hawksbill turtles from the Cuban shelf inform scale of conservation and management","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Wildlife Fund Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Geography; Fishery; National park; Ecology; Biology; Population; Demography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02592473507022344,"score_gpt":0.22428736318411555,"score_spread":0.1983626281138921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126476059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975534,0.00009379569,0.0005610097,0.00095075346,0.0000595766,0.00023855129,0.00005632579,0.000010576924,0.00047600176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984227,0.00013594904,0.0005982469,0.0006801802,0.000019328256,0.000013934246,0.00009208755,0.000002671107,0.0000348948],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992036,0.000090942885,0.00033656173,0.00012673235,0.00012135063,0.00012079689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999276,0.0002540444,0.00025803142,0.000160418,0.00002235736,0.000029167517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003299436,0.00009153264,0.00015262456,0.000014654219,0.000047386682,0.000003305363,0.0001330424,0.00011341964,0.00022808774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000676822,0.000056045745,0.000038850998,0.00010179653,0.00032404045,0.0001624146,0.00012577801,0.00005184144,0.000005588359],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007084495,0.000054977347,0.97868973,0.000013311531,0.000016742155,5.5954292e-8,0.0002593006,0.0000019550193,0.014947863,0.002644797,0.00020467897,0.0030957523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021928185,0.00007734581,0.9903096,0.000021973938,0.00002179008,5.275301e-7,0.0003211891,0.00017908656,0.0060498863,0.0005166978,0.0022153854,0.000067215115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001923482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003054735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011619899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017005721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004052379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29077423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128793450","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.09.023","title":"Do plant traits influence a species’ response to habitat disturbance? A meta-analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Habitat; Biology; Ecology; Species richness; Abundance (ecology); Temperate climate; Herbaceous plant; Pollination; Pollen","score_opus":0.18059673136342147,"score_gpt":0.2481640934086875,"score_spread":0.06756736204526603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128793450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859948,0.00027440372,0.000007677657,0.012801555,0.000010405424,0.0003414943,0.00027226156,0.00007937336,0.00021801089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959443,0.000021255899,0.00015462308,0.003148091,0.000048539645,0.00016169777,0.0000611428,4.4651523e-7,0.00045986814],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864733,0.00021409587,0.0002802153,0.00039561614,0.00018017655,0.00028253728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876726,0.00085916225,0.00008996875,0.00003285622,0.00013110175,0.00011966572],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003666273,0.00018325221,0.0004930807,0.000023509629,0.00022024088,0.000118451884,0.00023658463,0.00009780775,0.0010223603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047615732,0.00005547897,0.00037067806,0.00081586174,0.000076172095,0.00012063359,0.00008820797,0.00007844651,0.00024145262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046403895,0.00008940109,0.2296612,0.0000020657594,0.0036478355,0.000007695532,0.00009153088,0.0000085655165,0.7586918,0.00068875146,0.005804172,0.000842973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004093637,0.0002998609,0.977509,0.0000014629752,0.0011500716,0.0000015091205,0.00009096621,0.0000146694665,0.00024936357,0.00028113072,0.020184305,0.0001767035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031035213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015011738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7584424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019615854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003862847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129038472","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2007.09.023","title":"Links between sex change and fish densities in marine protected areas","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Marine protected area; Marine reserve; Sex change; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Sex ratio; Marine conservation; Fishery; Marine fish; Biology; Ecology; Geography; Demography; Habitat; Population","score_opus":0.08442005219104406,"score_gpt":0.2454645256067444,"score_spread":0.16104447341570033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129038472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968567,0.000008246388,0.000027320535,0.0015028011,0.000023443949,0.00032324853,0.000002989115,0.000038583305,0.0012166944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987715,0.000017171284,0.00019687264,0.0006640513,0.00006535915,0.00003412171,0.00002281158,0.0000020859572,0.00022601582],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945045,0.000033996635,0.00014826538,0.00016216836,0.00005955385,0.00014556645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977463,0.00009617237,0.00004012955,0.000050010876,0.000006984503,0.000032039006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003027926,0.00007379947,0.00011680952,0.000019290432,0.000056565295,0.000008402871,0.00003965445,0.00011028989,0.00009171976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092012524,0.000053129468,0.000011608166,0.00011885659,0.000076779725,0.000062936255,0.00024451685,0.00010137795,0.000013702631],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013934685,0.00000938745,0.97496825,0.0000044406443,0.0000018238006,0.0000037458294,0.0000734973,2.3803018e-8,0.00055728765,0.00002761231,0.0001015117,0.024238486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013103854,0.00008315541,0.99364686,0.0000063773177,0.0000017126149,0.0000019045845,0.00005883982,0.000030675976,0.00016921104,0.0005853451,0.0052062054,0.00007869652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021424172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036812574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024159791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041458705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000012859646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32387084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131652081","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2007.05.020","title":"Assessing the potential for impacts by feral mink on wild mink in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mink; American mink; Mustelidae; Ecology; Population density; Biology; Geography; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.027355986535876637,"score_gpt":0.26284661935592846,"score_spread":0.2354906328200518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131652081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98859847,0.00001525757,0.00094882323,0.009575148,0.00017531021,0.00029721257,0.0000067563797,0.000012651701,0.00037039057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98543584,0.000003472426,0.00032371032,0.014040998,0.000035091874,0.000021140542,0.00006398343,0.0000036190872,0.000072127164],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908364,0.000083983665,0.00022868338,0.00020885243,0.000117977,0.00027684245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927413,0.00047882332,0.00009382206,0.00009691471,0.000010062737,0.00004621739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067041075,0.00009719331,0.00009374231,0.000012798601,0.00018236857,0.000025148682,0.00013424481,0.00011376563,0.00014108435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028169647,0.00006368839,0.000026445967,0.00014007789,0.00009086465,0.00014377912,0.00003072313,0.00011890022,0.000012018312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007771144,0.000031293825,0.9732885,0.0000012989886,0.0000028546115,0.0000034335524,0.0000136349545,0.000079976686,0.0054312916,0.0001081393,0.018199755,0.002762128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027965038,0.00008456999,0.9925344,0.0000052820774,0.0000029785374,0.0000019947358,0.0000951316,0.0016757249,0.00038300734,0.0004236644,0.0044206963,0.000092912356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23288383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55947673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3265929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004135481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008307893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7722245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134706900","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.09.007","title":"Viability of mountain caribou in British Columbia, Canada: Effects of habitat change and population density","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Vital rates; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Endangered species; Population; Ecology; Habitat; Population decline; Population density; Density dependence; Population size; Population viability analysis; Population growth; Population model; Geography; Mark and recapture; Population projection; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.015746438749639678,"score_gpt":0.1988971412938415,"score_spread":0.18315070254420182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134706900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990121,0.000026149148,0.000015014335,0.0005310568,0.000035453104,0.000349679,0.000006903324,0.0000072397006,0.000016389055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987246,0.000009036581,0.00014360054,0.001057184,0.0000064693418,0.000012651096,0.00003974985,0.0000011360044,0.000005577239],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928635,0.00013929109,0.00022165276,0.00016927597,0.00008417539,0.00009922578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995988,0.00017549112,0.00010972987,0.000073442156,0.000017035858,0.000025497851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025814172,0.000045528486,0.00015541953,0.000008296893,0.00004311004,0.0000059422923,0.00004712702,0.00010883828,0.000028975308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039667625,0.00005990606,0.000013751689,0.00013904953,0.00010553859,0.000102013226,0.00002746878,0.000053917996,3.0284085e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011712619,0.00004783235,0.9948424,0.000011984939,0.0000012118362,0.0000022529912,0.000019031118,0.0000020356163,0.0011468934,0.000028451892,0.00009901458,0.003787194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020331156,0.00014365933,0.997457,0.0000141337,0.0000036209926,0.0000016324425,0.000011286643,0.00019809675,0.00010394223,0.0017890148,0.000015134672,0.000059113885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9421085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99267507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05056655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012582647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019362291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24428982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138446583","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.07.017","title":"Beaver (Castor canadensis) as a surrogate species for conserving anuran amphibians on boreal streams in Alberta, Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and biodiversity studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Beaver; Castor canadensis; Amphibian; Boreal; Ecology; Habitat; Taiga; Abundance (ecology); STREAMS; Biology","score_opus":0.023109704220018373,"score_gpt":0.19932444643002434,"score_spread":0.17621474221000596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138446583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98737,0.0000062146105,0.000003036167,0.008132781,0.00009123562,0.00025959758,0.000080966594,0.000012689287,0.0040434804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951588,0.0000074724403,0.00009366998,0.0032813125,0.00002658724,0.000015807433,0.00013070564,0.0000024094288,0.0012832652],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991743,0.00005815389,0.0001582747,0.00026100964,0.00009376422,0.00025450657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992621,0.00054367626,0.00006259143,0.0000794862,0.000013883384,0.000038275488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001109254,0.00011693264,0.00015270966,0.000018221575,0.00020872365,0.000009399451,0.00010314941,0.00010061919,0.00016383994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017631061,0.00009337702,0.000032105418,0.00010440157,0.0001871978,0.0000458456,0.00005594823,0.00006593158,0.00002684579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008821244,0.000037362643,0.9723976,0.0000024498927,0.0000051565316,0.000013607723,0.000029670375,0.00003646972,0.00039286548,0.00049920625,0.026364485,0.00013286553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036043962,0.00015002581,0.9735259,0.0000054763714,0.0000053677004,0.000001742947,0.0001660414,0.000102587444,0.0003295481,0.00029018245,0.02493562,0.00012709424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97192043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99859065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026670251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036127135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005642395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38078043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140988450","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.01.020","title":"Effects of habitat loss, habitat configuration and matrix composition on declining wetland species","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Wetland; Habitat; Ecology; Habitat destruction; Threatened species; Landscape ecology; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Habitat fragmentation; Environmental science; Fragmentation (computing); Turtle (robot); Biology","score_opus":0.01882434792921067,"score_gpt":0.2332186452139441,"score_spread":0.21439429728473341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140988450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959897,0.00004834408,0.0006975771,0.001964381,0.00008434325,0.00041002457,0.00000323766,0.00003892808,0.00076348596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980087,0.000049488393,0.00065371796,0.0010234432,0.000028059401,0.00004361057,0.00007147898,0.0000037393104,0.000117748226],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914134,0.00015566722,0.00024378934,0.00023237102,0.00009773196,0.00012909788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991168,0.0005792502,0.0001488345,0.00008510819,0.000027534297,0.000042490425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015198361,0.00011737823,0.00015228722,0.000025824465,0.00011262721,0.00002152777,0.00006810317,0.00016173873,0.00026115938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016886849,0.00008676942,0.000030538853,0.00009566844,0.00033105642,0.00018595278,0.000038631893,0.000083388324,0.00017352351],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006394227,0.000040564155,0.65268356,0.000010764645,0.0000052064447,9.075764e-7,0.000029730643,0.000007095766,0.343391,0.0019734248,0.0007058622,0.0010879474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037179288,0.000352814,0.96782833,0.000023251378,0.000008163948,0.0000028402135,0.000017535596,0.0003471491,0.027525354,0.0028408587,0.0005747765,0.00010715116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009304467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036370075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31586564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031436615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004714603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3538354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141574903","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.05.028","title":"Conservation and the scarecrow effect: Can human activity benefit threatened species by displacing predators?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Earthwatch Institute","keywords":"Mongoose; Threatened species; Predation; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Habitat; Endangered species; Nest (protein structural motif); Biology; Critically endangered","score_opus":0.013802951592910414,"score_gpt":0.22116605611362475,"score_spread":0.20736310452071433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141574903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99037987,0.000022130751,0.00009468371,0.0075928755,0.00014362406,0.00050651445,0.000026190697,0.00007925714,0.0011548669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974115,0.00001733296,0.00006355378,0.0016479949,0.00004947746,0.000092215116,0.00014400457,0.0000066745297,0.00056723366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988267,0.00023458415,0.00020669593,0.00038038552,0.00013184153,0.0002198303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898976,0.0005297933,0.00016375004,0.00023229931,0.000022063332,0.00006233799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007256556,0.00019007466,0.00020794006,0.000012412439,0.00056923233,0.00006540772,0.00018217985,0.00027194116,0.0003524124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029311114,0.00011269656,0.000050027746,0.00015368011,0.001086741,0.00018972774,0.0001354265,0.00027590888,0.00002323575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001792971,0.000018093042,0.69348836,0.000002822053,0.000008424704,3.579426e-7,0.000050848612,6.568068e-7,0.29892907,0.00427189,0.0010450984,0.002005065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008987702,0.0001324659,0.974621,0.000005356893,0.000018448023,0.0000053424164,0.000016318862,0.00039906707,0.016490404,0.0035669273,0.0036805188,0.00016540264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002088735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035757876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28243867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040938365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007353235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45956323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141767450","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.025","title":"Defining protected area boundaries based on vascular-plant species richness using hydrological information derived from archived satellite imagery","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Soil erosion and sediment transport","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Alberta; Western University","funders":"Government of Alberta; Alberta Conservation Association; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Species richness; Biodiversity; Vascular plant; Environmental science; Satellite imagery; Synthetic aperture radar; Range (aeronautics); Remote sensing; Geography; Ecology; Hydrology (agriculture); Geology","score_opus":0.05656964439523683,"score_gpt":0.21417703167409438,"score_spread":0.15760738727885754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141767450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99717885,0.00009553525,0.0008242172,0.000651364,0.00019033515,0.00039630418,0.00016572227,0.00021988469,0.00027779618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99227417,0.000030356725,0.001300367,0.002755353,0.00010797489,0.00004398646,0.0034827925,0.0000011642936,0.0000038638736],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984123,0.00024323381,0.00040557253,0.00025131964,0.00029144218,0.00039614216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897593,0.00055254984,0.00018012899,0.00008108219,0.00007749641,0.0001327827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037980612,0.000236235,0.00026847172,0.000029852954,0.00049984676,0.00017651472,0.00016327015,0.00023719801,0.00044156477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027613973,0.00009245625,0.00013144298,0.00022105426,0.00023434742,0.00036990995,0.000034417466,0.00019704652,0.000052445917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029297484,0.00014192404,0.712921,0.000004466795,0.000013323963,0.0000018324523,0.000103593105,0.000026994028,0.28283867,0.00044549315,0.000034542343,0.0031751604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000291841,0.00017545634,0.9766663,0.00003137154,0.000016110014,0.0000012737412,0.000109067194,0.0029801459,0.0062094904,0.00013932372,0.013130401,0.00024925944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023451881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047194768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27662918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041226955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021263757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48348245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149189573","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.041","title":"Dynamics and trends of overwintering colonies of the monarch butterfly in Mexico","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Instituto Carlos Slim de la Salud; World Wildlife Fund; David and Lucile Packard Foundation","keywords":"Monarch butterfly; Overwintering; Danaus; Geography; Population; Butterfly; Ecology; Habitat; Nymphalidae; Population decline; Biology; Lepidoptera genitalia; Demography","score_opus":0.055891643246265735,"score_gpt":0.22119902844487901,"score_spread":0.16530738519861327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149189573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971254,0.000044037308,0.000001974678,0.0023574776,0.0000111582995,0.000032231437,0.000020134561,0.0000053439317,0.00040227108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997954,0.000033533743,0.000015578284,0.00010619837,0.000010949398,0.0000023490552,0.000006379326,1.2394591e-7,0.000029508552],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996296,0.000052734664,0.00012771455,0.000078979145,0.000044926222,0.00006603256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969757,0.00020215912,0.00006291949,0.000010321486,0.000018871364,0.0000081675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001332892,0.00004422434,0.000107839325,0.0000059218937,0.000035904428,0.000003744219,0.00007463071,0.000042853808,0.0000087979715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007747252,0.000012922423,0.000024635381,0.00012392715,0.000104317034,0.000018375069,0.000072593444,0.00003405914,1.6302516e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003539233,0.0000134334205,0.8675117,0.00000257417,0.0000017692876,5.58524e-8,0.000016252288,4.3362368e-7,0.11976329,0.0024729387,0.000009260608,0.0101729045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049500908,0.0001830066,0.99550444,0.000016070147,0.0000012600161,5.8743325e-7,0.000059590016,0.00072005176,0.0024950614,0.0006930753,0.000245229,0.000032106058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002447897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027439997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12799276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000054824054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":6.9116925e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15312162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152687399","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00103-9","title":"Mitochondrial genetic diversity and population structuring of UK bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): is the NE Scotland population demographically and geographically isolated?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Population; Genetic diversity; Biology; mtDNA control region; Geography; Mitochondrial DNA; Genetic monitoring; Ecology; Zoology; Microsatellite; Haplotype; Demography; Genetics; Allele","score_opus":0.025736554192652708,"score_gpt":0.20924269631001682,"score_spread":0.1835061421173641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152687399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99800456,0.00035070637,0.00006894453,0.0010822011,0.00005171846,0.00034548217,0.000008932904,0.00002394104,0.000063530715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974117,0.00088701525,0.00091115624,0.0007249666,0.00003408098,0.000004922192,0.000013571514,0.0000043468385,0.000008218655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988557,0.0001321085,0.00028877438,0.00033907083,0.00020958265,0.00017473297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945223,0.00014692506,0.00016916018,0.0001469509,0.000019545805,0.00006516442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001632436,0.0001487517,0.00019237626,0.000032139156,0.00060981483,0.000023984936,0.00013468748,0.0001460872,0.00033846174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013471926,0.00009811367,0.000055074524,0.000272162,0.00028575875,0.00010313853,0.0007218229,0.00012127338,0.0000022167237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000711345,0.000019597337,0.9923081,0.000009295237,0.000013997968,7.3404226e-7,0.00011581683,0.0000058119267,0.0008426006,0.00009823305,0.00008829762,0.0064264117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003180837,0.00020691424,0.9950393,0.000011051419,0.00003350764,0.000005823225,0.000013028076,0.0018093301,0.0000075105786,0.0022205254,0.00020942185,0.0001255462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074413233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015295842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006300865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002251416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":7.667669e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153741995","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.027","title":"Survival, dispersal and early migration movements of captive-bred juvenile eastern loggerhead shrikes (Lanius ludovicianus migrans)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Shrike; Juvenile; Biology; Ecology; Zoology; Fishery; Population; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.028903383405524192,"score_gpt":0.24405666686495367,"score_spread":0.21515328345942947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153741995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99863595,0.000016949325,0.0001878229,0.00046509874,0.00016595959,0.00021823507,0.000014236203,0.000026322468,0.0002694345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991727,0.000009356071,0.00029971573,0.0002018699,0.000021943904,0.000018949808,0.000027577771,0.000004356574,0.00024356651],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991639,0.00008047572,0.00023362898,0.00024974547,0.00010946452,0.00016278613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996111,0.000080372214,0.00012078501,0.00011452736,0.000016127782,0.000057081685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002076799,0.00011270826,0.00016242194,0.000019510177,0.00009817243,0.000011911036,0.000107071726,0.00019820157,0.00052170904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006734028,0.0000868049,0.00003691811,0.000085466636,0.00041668364,0.00013503696,0.000060747294,0.00012887605,0.00006058985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004969819,0.000083926774,0.8506131,0.0000022220645,0.0000039567312,0.0000018361349,0.00014151512,5.9162915e-7,0.14728682,0.00006298014,0.00004528193,0.0017080778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002999629,0.00022973692,0.9957551,0.000004007293,0.000009995508,0.0000016818271,0.000072012495,0.000112266,0.0025659148,0.0001370265,0.00070522295,0.000107081156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014402593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007692827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14514199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016522054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006434448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5712348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160077014","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.08.020","title":"Burning biodiversity: Woody biomass use by commercial and subsistence groups in western Uganda’s forests","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Agroforestry; Subsistence agriculture; Woodland; Biomass (ecology); Charcoal; Biodiversity; Deforestation (computer science); Natural resource; Business; Geography; Environmental protection; Ecology; Agriculture; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.035589685226554285,"score_gpt":0.21282723071414938,"score_spread":0.1772375454875951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160077014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99869645,0.000033881115,0.00010598724,0.0008344153,0.000026223366,0.00008587836,0.0000125994175,0.000026476931,0.00017809244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99885505,0.000031261166,0.00013301894,0.0007452668,0.000010706267,0.0000041333315,0.00010946915,0.0000023498374,0.00010871083],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924225,0.00007628154,0.00014431594,0.00023340888,0.00010352471,0.00020024703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971074,0.00009479787,0.000059402453,0.0000808659,0.0000019795566,0.000052232048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015374002,0.00010758967,0.00010607135,0.000020945328,0.00011151821,0.000037854763,0.0000855676,0.00012261004,0.000089818466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004030571,0.00008735081,0.000018643703,0.00011579314,0.00023130886,0.0002987443,0.00011713597,0.00007208727,0.00004632409],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030297488,0.00005236309,0.9859355,0.0000012935722,0.0000013123151,0.0000060556376,0.000027981027,0.00006293041,0.012736619,0.0000286276,0.0007238226,0.0003932015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031153765,0.000075764015,0.99406815,0.0000054513052,0.0000031479362,0.000002608126,0.000014512138,0.00006854158,0.00053878984,0.0001357772,0.0046498473,0.00012589905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006585559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008340975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01219783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007460329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000018568637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160457197","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2007.02.018","title":"Heuristic algorithms vs. linear programs for designing efficient conservation reserve networks: Evaluation of solution optimality and processing time","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Heuristic; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Null-move heuristic; Consistent heuristic; Search algorithm; Mathematics; Incremental heuristic search; Beam search","score_opus":0.29048324169723255,"score_gpt":0.2993051758238464,"score_spread":0.008821934126613862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160457197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6631719,0.00055077346,0.3350522,0.00023527861,0.00005899788,0.0007658932,0.000014795401,0.00002534887,0.00012481539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97612596,0.000029207973,0.023114074,0.00014938081,0.00007586387,0.000088530105,0.0003841199,0.0000106874995,0.000022207949],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.998464,0.000072982286,0.00078376546,0.0003822601,0.00006914046,0.00022786825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988555,0.00020818342,0.0006186134,0.0001180562,0.00014977896,0.000049873615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070551825,0.0001303221,0.0002713669,0.000079648315,0.00015834665,0.0000302936,0.00007216085,0.00018513369,0.000031967968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000595479,0.0001349378,0.000056657474,0.00014831423,0.00014226882,0.00015605913,0.00003451475,0.00007162864,0.000010835672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042315555,0.00034812072,0.93811226,0.00011034753,0.00005094413,2.8458797e-7,0.00024519692,0.01329251,0.0017531428,0.005588598,0.00016181523,0.039913617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005976604,0.00017428017,0.3423127,0.000021992191,0.000015716838,8.183055e-7,0.000028286393,0.65404665,0.00016185084,0.002408741,0.00011833799,0.00011297797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013124153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011527672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64075416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018930904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023059325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55026037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164115678","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.023","title":"Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":306,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Population; Life history theory; Reproductive success; Biology; Habitat; Mammal; Geography; Life history; Demography","score_opus":0.24275007928229805,"score_gpt":0.29891970659228884,"score_spread":0.05616962730999078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164115678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99132705,0.000286973,0.0017192836,0.0041178283,0.00014967687,0.00030126525,0.000018902107,0.00009023322,0.0019887933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874296,0.000009094747,0.002195961,0.007674672,0.00009292266,0.00014621404,0.00009067675,0.000007966319,0.002352888],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998225,0.0004017391,0.00043647175,0.0003605347,0.00028383758,0.00029244836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990363,0.00028626065,0.0001879497,0.00024629897,0.000033237742,0.00020993379],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007986611,0.00019187016,0.00039382715,0.00014966291,0.0001480543,0.000037293372,0.000164931,0.00013306172,0.015774881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076977635,0.00014324945,0.00038058878,0.0006344681,0.00007385794,0.0005669018,0.0000829159,0.000103274346,0.00056111836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016550858,0.00016199,0.95934093,0.000001760313,0.002426038,5.875647e-7,0.00040359073,0.00021576324,0.007796469,0.001807864,0.027118772,0.00056073425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006374762,0.000063078274,0.8855474,7.3576086e-7,0.0025059218,0.0000013469972,0.00009349055,0.00017278556,0.00005570691,0.000065876215,0.11124849,0.00018140653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010406629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022913632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08412972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039867268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012907793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165609016","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.011","title":"Whooping crane recruitment enhanced by egg removal","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Predation; Biology; Flock; Endangered species; Population; Reproductive success; Ecology; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Zoology; Fishery; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.08137110671381177,"score_gpt":0.29541733048736035,"score_spread":0.2140462237735486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165609016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99276614,0.000029303956,0.0009988971,0.0033942203,0.000066060245,0.00027044825,0.0000036793676,0.00006186289,0.0024093785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907974,0.000027708866,0.003541554,0.003720226,0.00004233219,0.00006113841,0.000043034688,0.0000032516177,0.0017633479],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927926,0.00006951246,0.00016385509,0.0002318834,0.000075926044,0.0001795465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997396,0.000050468752,0.000058973757,0.00009867439,0.000005304401,0.00004700624],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001674122,0.000084517334,0.00009151855,0.0000070700808,0.00011504514,0.000008198376,0.000103113794,0.00013729327,0.004015615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005782373,0.00006438111,0.000028935332,0.00007998444,0.00013581564,0.00010663334,0.00005722343,0.00008254698,0.0010518424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047229398,0.00015666017,0.48874268,0.0000010326055,0.0000036622907,0.0000032475837,0.000055345525,0.0000134827,0.42515606,0.00005962977,0.010385141,0.07537582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002666441,0.00014465416,0.8216281,0.000003885305,0.0000054579923,0.0000053888893,0.000017408609,0.00006111194,0.023574365,0.00014114071,0.15401192,0.00013989853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000146207185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049182596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4015817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012430307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000045044562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165794323","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.038","title":"The effects of heat stress, predation risk and parental investment on Malaysian plover nest return times following a human disturbance","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Plover; Disturbance (geology); Nest (protein structural motif); Predation; Ecology; Heat stress; Biology; Geography; Animal science; Habitat","score_opus":0.009111412214567132,"score_gpt":0.2176403393949084,"score_spread":0.20852892718034127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165794323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99907154,0.00005793438,0.000012340447,0.00015787093,0.00006098333,0.0002832959,0.0000077846735,0.000017198894,0.00033105642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995303,0.000012342596,0.000044920434,0.00014344374,0.00001669536,0.00003126915,0.00005625183,0.0000026952982,0.00016205563],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993678,0.00012076619,0.0001436003,0.00017520909,0.0000819573,0.00011068252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961156,0.00019163924,0.0000775629,0.00009527957,0.0000030333506,0.000020914651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011018829,0.00008221588,0.00008417035,0.0000062376357,0.00024452308,0.000012571043,0.00006706206,0.00008033045,0.000032928867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006978267,0.000049133338,0.00003173385,0.00005359146,0.00023731042,0.00006832394,0.00004654322,0.00006966349,0.000009728969],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020343532,0.000079265796,0.9870546,0.0000027683866,0.000003232819,0.0000017069444,0.000018051476,0.000009256021,0.011977449,0.00028342108,0.0002822542,0.0002676397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022000677,0.0002910906,0.99422413,0.000015094775,0.000015819509,4.453206e-7,0.00001431546,0.00007776154,0.0038554093,0.00102223,0.00020156376,0.000062136525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020575742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026777043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00812204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045517005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002257847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20035993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166181523","doi":"10.1016/s0006-3207(99)00068-3","title":"Distribution of three monkey species along a gradient of regenerating tropical dry forest","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Park Service; University of Alberta","keywords":"Transect; Habitat; Tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf forests; National park; Geography; Ecology; Tropical forest; Biomass (ecology); Wildlife; Tropics; Forestry; Biology; Agroforestry","score_opus":0.09626440355746473,"score_gpt":0.3018840801841034,"score_spread":0.20561967662663866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166181523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974577,0.00012486307,0.00070888747,0.00026064547,0.00013719244,0.00017080357,0.00006393788,0.000032285763,0.001043711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992082,0.000021459955,0.00025663723,0.00007098288,0.00005052412,0.000029557712,0.0002661701,0.0000037878328,0.00009267467],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999021,0.000110240515,0.00041943754,0.00019402523,0.0000705742,0.00018473953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994741,0.0001228007,0.00013308148,0.00017058688,0.00006590282,0.000033535867],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012884696,0.0000924805,0.00022795398,0.000023330469,0.00005191242,0.000004048021,0.00010810592,0.00019264525,0.0011955944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009315148,0.00007131661,0.000075516415,0.00011790177,0.00019846906,0.00003462094,0.000022685983,0.00008279491,0.000025771787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013534888,0.00015524396,0.9124945,0.0000048590387,0.000010928441,0.000002502407,0.000051775132,0.000009746272,0.004177726,0.07733975,0.0002781469,0.005339465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035365322,0.00039193305,0.99605584,0.0000075765224,0.000013897947,0.0000037664956,0.000040780327,0.00012419742,0.00115525,0.00071560685,0.001063982,0.000073518764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032536898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035727993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08356133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029945972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000130423405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170600888","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2009.07.029","title":"Using a novel survey technique to predict fisheries stakeholders’ support for European eel (Anguilla anguilla L.) conservation programs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Escapement; Fishing; Fishery; Business; Stock (firearms); Fish stock; Environmental resource management; Preference; Stakeholder; Fisheries management; Geography; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.5406014207082467,"score_gpt":0.2882287402309766,"score_spread":0.2523726804772701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170600888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8658069,0.00003977778,0.12933289,0.0012195134,0.00013063978,0.0013964557,0.00033692177,0.00009449645,0.001642423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714133,0.000016777356,0.023620604,0.0034790214,0.00008568432,0.000094288414,0.0010927215,0.000020744279,0.00017684065],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998363,0.000067803194,0.00071983377,0.0005161585,0.00003806212,0.00029512693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991472,0.00008905466,0.00036344441,0.00024524916,0.000061031475,0.00009404407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017789353,0.00020090681,0.00032000715,0.000100155274,0.00015481889,0.00008898493,0.00018337468,0.00016038257,0.00011771371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005385118,0.00021027983,0.000094580326,0.00018982399,0.000077811375,0.0002631406,0.000042981617,0.00007922674,0.00006440406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008221412,0.00014917582,0.9836359,0.00001019444,0.000018687319,5.0710463e-7,0.00009930758,0.00004953826,0.0055414746,0.007376227,0.0014979594,0.0015387948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051208126,0.00065408,0.9783614,0.000013761976,0.0000049434952,0.0000037728917,0.000042398635,0.002132347,0.00017117303,0.0025187943,0.015300128,0.0002850877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031867682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000072901224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10571229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017785653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022160568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85749626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173310646","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.10.008","title":"The conservation value of high elevation habitats to North American migrant birds","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Environment Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; American Ornithologists' Union","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Species richness; Geography; Threatened species; Abundance (ecology); Range (aeronautics); Elevation (ballistics); Biology","score_opus":0.045951059780998116,"score_gpt":0.26304753144002707,"score_spread":0.21709647165902896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173310646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99178404,0.000005877634,0.0007777202,0.006879194,0.000112189824,0.0003228033,0.000009429745,0.000039847484,0.000068895526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950396,0.0000050726676,0.0020129934,0.0027379924,0.000021114149,0.000050319133,0.00004176604,0.00000453913,0.00008661326],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989801,0.00016683558,0.0002826065,0.00021029885,0.00017795712,0.00018221463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928206,0.00021094375,0.00018734859,0.00017210007,0.000058382833,0.00008916803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038643653,0.00009803021,0.00013629229,0.000019642013,0.00014341617,0.000011401249,0.00018199034,0.00006139253,0.00003470906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057430094,0.00006172076,0.000030788156,0.00046002542,0.00045088542,0.000092191316,0.00007983627,0.00007534833,0.00017313362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010329891,0.00004987208,0.9873721,6.240912e-7,0.000003310947,8.021863e-7,0.0000952293,0.0000784233,0.00355993,0.0003542893,0.0029140597,0.005468056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017358077,0.00050376053,0.9901621,0.0000019266986,0.000007944167,0.0000015132374,0.000077736884,0.00017341135,0.0007417584,0.00058987696,0.0074756173,0.00009078436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013542459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040520625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053772717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009496248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024337218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25168997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218656748","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.025","title":"A long-term genetic study reveals complex population dynamics of multiple-source plant reintroductions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation","keywords":"Outbreeding depression; Inbreeding depression; Biology; Population fragmentation; Local adaptation; Inbreeding; Ecology; Maladaptation; Genetic diversity; Population; Heterosis; Small population size; Conservation genetics; Microsatellite; Demography; Allele; Agronomy; Habitat; Genetics","score_opus":0.08067905779956103,"score_gpt":0.2804100699380045,"score_spread":0.19973101213844346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218656748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949244,0.000049749844,0.0041366927,0.0002177607,0.00014366722,0.00039389968,0.0000785718,0.000019529663,0.000035710713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99531764,0.0000098664,0.0014824915,0.00013830753,0.00013343451,0.00000844959,0.0027652166,0.0000063751827,0.0001382249],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989712,0.00018135087,0.00029816787,0.0002849519,0.00013938906,0.00012492848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992837,0.00002007339,0.00018013192,0.0002523677,0.00019030657,0.000073441355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018019046,0.000120848825,0.00016325942,0.000043358745,0.00007701939,0.000013518961,0.00013359786,0.00015752208,0.000020118294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030045616,0.00010581823,0.00005208624,0.00011580843,0.000063327214,0.0000042698307,0.00008924688,0.00005663028,0.0000041839553],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014870288,0.00009309397,0.98501676,0.0000059609793,0.000028733846,0.0000012311189,0.00006048538,0.00064019964,0.012755939,0.00007022501,0.0005189499,0.0006597404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006851679,0.0005204338,0.9970194,0.000004112381,0.000023225604,0.000015252328,0.00022002212,0.0004788745,0.0002817671,0.00012758527,0.00049677386,0.00012736947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014973797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033938827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012474172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023537541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021679543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43151423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232909250","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.040","title":"Beta diversity declines while native plant species richness triples over 35years in a suburban protected area","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Species evenness; Alpha diversity; Biodiversity; Beta diversity; Ecology; Gamma diversity; Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Species diversity; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.06695658307928322,"score_gpt":0.23437586542653882,"score_spread":0.16741928234725562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232909250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99729663,0.000022361137,0.00021092709,0.001283471,0.00005489786,0.00029765407,0.000037832826,0.000036751404,0.0007594506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99904156,0.00009306914,0.00013505637,0.00028310012,0.0000105980525,0.000039047474,0.000021636108,0.0000019430279,0.00037401766],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992536,0.000114801136,0.00015789756,0.00023136071,0.00009215289,0.00015022517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946445,0.00033689596,0.000085980355,0.000069707,0.000018491122,0.000024487194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021422532,0.00009363767,0.00013289384,0.00003253306,0.0001889082,0.000005877033,0.00011656272,0.00009087995,0.0005721658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003276181,0.000054864642,0.000027972668,0.00018855586,0.0002905764,0.0001253614,0.00026045798,0.00005999318,0.00004295367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011349642,0.00006128474,0.99540734,0.0000012253917,0.0000071518534,0.0000041548533,0.00013693742,0.000005632451,0.003022471,0.000652877,0.00041160776,0.00017584374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000543599,0.00010383012,0.99603635,0.000010381508,0.0000022565703,7.38812e-7,0.00005876609,0.00019215512,0.00033445773,0.0015758828,0.0010408455,0.00010073601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011755475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030115552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028940004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098180244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006109548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6264815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254101760","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.01.015","title":"Optimising different types of biodiversity coverage of protected areas with a case study using Himalayan Galliformes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Galliformes; Biodiversity; Species richness; Threatened species; Geography; Global biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.04605082224620229,"score_gpt":0.2442325053887587,"score_spread":0.1981816831425564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254101760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974955,0.000003775502,0.0020045186,0.00008907365,0.000010728257,0.0003232756,0.000011158696,0.000012132768,0.000049849277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992496,0.000005735626,0.00070224295,0.000024167886,0.0000017195933,0.000005592139,0.0000018760946,0.0000011265342,0.000007973767],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949616,0.00008111058,0.00013871033,0.00013182922,0.00007381528,0.00007838653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996191,0.00011560297,0.00014735249,0.00006664655,0.00003337477,0.000017911605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011052761,0.00006827471,0.00013173607,0.000020123784,0.00009262949,0.000002357897,0.00004787772,0.00004512809,0.0001059186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008058304,0.000034411598,0.000018385184,0.00009474931,0.00023334805,0.00006475305,0.00007452822,0.00002676342,0.0000026269677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098288576,0.00016448587,0.9858738,0.0000043616883,0.00002430729,0.000017511571,0.00016037055,0.000104415594,0.013294742,0.000016931048,0.0000028711668,0.0002379177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004660037,0.0005749433,0.99707687,0.000011577354,0.000019737778,0.000019194347,0.00030374114,0.00045837913,0.0009263737,0.00007922201,0.0000023760642,0.00006155388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035324856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004786723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012368369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045431294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000056910962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14032643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292935233","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.02.022","title":"Integrated population modeling to assess demographic variation and contributions to population growth for endangered whooping cranes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Environment Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Fledge; Endangered species; Biology; Population; Population growth; Ecology; Population size; Abundance (ecology); Demography; Zoology; Hatching; Habitat","score_opus":0.06939636994840025,"score_gpt":0.29850205817418496,"score_spread":0.2291056882257847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292935233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7332554,0.0000024108092,0.26329756,0.0027217667,0.00007531575,0.00052763615,0.00006270597,0.000054070915,0.0000031699587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99356604,0.000004307459,0.005274392,0.0007261596,0.0000333072,0.00015469563,0.00021368482,0.0000053312597,0.000022098662],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990984,0.00009835565,0.00024296489,0.0003020514,0.00007432271,0.00018387262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952304,0.00017892192,0.00006791768,0.00007559678,0.00006879747,0.000085748434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034474116,0.00010524407,0.00012994684,0.000063064595,0.00023566467,0.000022412587,0.00006463396,0.00016554142,0.00007038977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089949806,0.00007126508,0.000030259398,0.00024419228,0.00002770526,0.00022412922,0.00004282895,0.000039034436,0.000021094656],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072288116,0.000022685921,0.9408572,0.0000016948643,0.0000031516602,1.5595205e-7,0.00003629721,0.00010580687,0.05459149,0.00074444147,0.000049868562,0.0035149292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027616895,0.00014419196,0.99141544,0.00001903681,0.000014241273,0.0000012653396,0.0000104499995,0.0031714297,0.00026843752,0.0044990163,0.000051923762,0.00012839686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052725914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071212795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26031065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015345236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000047773046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29061055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294390461","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.02.033","title":"Prioritizing management actions for the conservation of freshwater biodiversity under changing climate and land-cover","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Global Institute for Water Security","funders":"Queensland Government; University of Queensland; Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Australian Research Council","keywords":"Riparian zone; Climate change; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem services; Land cover; Adaptive management; Land use; Biodiversity; Land management; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental science; Ecosystem; Ecology; Habitat","score_opus":0.057326083969648306,"score_gpt":0.24263818741565538,"score_spread":0.18531210344600707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294390461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97647196,0.000011353504,0.005791459,0.016608594,0.00007451293,0.0003992308,0.00003275914,0.000024638552,0.0005854879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99544144,0.0003790378,0.00083922583,0.0030310238,0.000009952064,0.00004533645,0.000009988793,0.0000014733806,0.00024250658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955827,0.00002405479,0.00009306092,0.00013564235,0.000044497094,0.00014447127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996348,0.00022169463,0.00005925416,0.0000645363,0.000009392942,0.00001033691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002888319,0.000054771757,0.00006433674,0.000019350617,0.00032979812,0.00000639179,0.000055432185,0.000039857692,0.00013626656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031017928,0.000028281813,0.000020855736,0.00006498606,0.00019097015,0.00009693074,0.0002106557,0.000017216844,0.00002507606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055581302,0.000018166096,0.98576695,0.000012315508,0.00003436331,2.993145e-7,0.000039590752,0.000004648976,0.0016822823,0.003948777,0.007314276,0.0011227429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003382555,0.000045652374,0.9713078,0.000007438683,0.000026018539,3.1628508e-7,0.00012031162,0.0001625709,0.0001397751,0.0010556991,0.0267436,0.000052520605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003846758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033911515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019429324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002682482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":7.682989e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2536574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298262464","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.02.013","title":"Reducing the impacts of Neotropical oil palm development on functional diversity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Oil Palm Production and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Agroforestry; Habitat; Biodiversity; Foraging; Abundance (ecology); Species diversity; Geography; Alpha diversity; Biology","score_opus":0.05060310659022804,"score_gpt":0.2306215016171966,"score_spread":0.18001839502696856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298262464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913606,0.0000032120913,0.0002408367,0.007284613,0.00008929735,0.000046234632,0.000001164763,0.000019716996,0.0009543217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880475,0.0000063228317,0.00017433614,0.0005179935,0.000026094056,0.00000448872,0.0000019924664,0.000001147819,0.0004628648],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992949,0.000106254854,0.00013866437,0.00018685628,0.00016244524,0.00011088431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996142,0.00014406383,0.000058602796,0.00012391261,0.000021956543,0.000037260346],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034344214,0.00005888645,0.000062901425,0.0000086907685,0.00022930637,0.0000038725466,0.00008863076,0.000049588816,0.0011602637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005292784,0.000026014792,0.000029270237,0.000088211185,0.0002598676,0.00005254477,0.00017457058,0.000046904857,0.000102385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011611358,0.00006390798,0.93852735,0.000002569555,0.0000039449033,3.6577666e-7,0.00010353821,0.000013452308,0.011309307,0.0006007958,0.0012206769,0.04803798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013987266,0.000066919885,0.98736674,0.0000046234795,0.0000013724122,8.130059e-7,0.000048659604,0.0000081520475,0.0028041769,0.00048648982,0.009025285,0.00004687428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000099711535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015232361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048839413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015971209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017204451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305233476","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.003","title":"De-extinction potential under climate change: Extensive mismatch between historic and future habitat suitability for three candidate birds","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Woodpecker; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Habitat destruction; Extinction debt; Range (aeronautics); Climate change; Local extinction; Occupancy; Umbrella species; Endangered species; Biology; Population; Biological dispersal","score_opus":0.06293912733086529,"score_gpt":0.26951949058625796,"score_spread":0.20658036325539267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305233476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98307574,0.000121071054,0.0039335815,0.011629814,0.00027489176,0.0004540712,0.0002797638,0.00007340778,0.00015764343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830556,0.0003088236,0.00009068557,0.000704593,0.00028191868,0.0001285946,0.00014206469,0.000007001701,0.000030769774],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990368,0.000062005885,0.00017651237,0.0003190636,0.0001072886,0.00029831097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952585,0.00011584769,0.0000972836,0.00012350407,0.000043971882,0.00009355302],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032327042,0.0001261768,0.00014197567,0.0000149223215,0.0002074438,0.000029273715,0.00007667371,0.00017518994,0.0019122285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078535035,0.00007957161,0.000047727866,0.00009660027,0.00020005055,0.0001601235,0.00008390197,0.00004680014,0.000060056547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012441968,0.00003343789,0.9586169,0.000009796765,0.0000064958253,7.432381e-7,0.000030848336,3.523032e-7,0.0149334,0.0017574475,0.0019593693,0.022526788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004459136,0.00014648805,0.9614233,0.0000036085894,0.000015693604,0.0000031210934,0.00015796971,0.00006251955,0.00010278024,0.001722582,0.035783272,0.00013274635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020364659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004138064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033823904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005504085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000060865445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461412668","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.024","title":"Loss of seed dispersal before the loss of seed dispersers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Frugivore; Biological dispersal; Seed dispersal; Threatened species; Biology; Population; Seed dispersal syndrome; Defaunation; Ecology; Habitat destruction; Small population size; Allee effect; Ecosystem; Habitat; Disturbance (geology); Seed predation","score_opus":0.018591377603973527,"score_gpt":0.2365651311721663,"score_spread":0.21797375356819276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461412668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924529,0.000016889027,0.0006207177,0.005496328,0.00006173768,0.00014365971,0.000017511506,0.000013408962,0.0011768063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993559,0.000018648743,0.0001036032,0.0002977657,0.000010484273,0.000010958958,0.0000068810546,0.000002386766,0.00019335875],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993586,0.00008538074,0.00021075309,0.00014519447,0.000090528134,0.00010956707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994638,0.00023098868,0.00014433633,0.000117693955,0.0000227615,0.000020415257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024047888,0.00007529176,0.00012723378,0.000010175832,0.00008573377,0.0000018439823,0.00014650739,0.000086272295,0.00018412716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024241727,0.000033781595,0.00005224916,0.00011258058,0.0011606452,0.000066534645,0.00009897128,0.00004074572,0.000038343587],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042947642,0.000034907593,0.98498714,0.000003070466,0.000014838851,5.3049786e-7,0.00022144151,0.000012394159,0.009731427,0.0047026593,0.000069205,0.00017943332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024263712,0.00014496177,0.9966593,0.000007316661,0.0000055495616,8.3789547e-7,0.00016526348,0.00038250996,0.000377706,0.001702879,0.00026344985,0.000047631107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001301644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004495661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011672113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034643013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007934581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42764452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482939527","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.020","title":"Camera-based occupancy monitoring at large scales: Power to detect trends in grizzly bears across the Canadian Rockies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada","funders":"Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative; Parks Canada; University of Montana","keywords":"Occupancy; Ursus; Threatened species; Grizzly Bears; Metric (unit); Camera trap; Geography; Scale (ratio); Abundance (ecology); Cartography; Ecology; Remote sensing; Physical geography; Environmental science; Habitat; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.028880811945012318,"score_gpt":0.26912732457145444,"score_spread":0.24024651262644212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482939527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847494,0.000016149419,0.00015195196,0.014370023,0.0001630628,0.00017371586,0.000034517194,0.00003660043,0.00030461318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99456227,0.0000032590767,0.00019365289,0.0047334726,0.000029801115,0.000086332264,0.000011986932,0.0000057084767,0.00037353745],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987126,0.00016327,0.00021812657,0.0003165039,0.0001266375,0.0004628391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935776,0.00024397824,0.00006173422,0.00019773522,0.000016116619,0.00012270537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005233236,0.00013152148,0.00011938671,0.000049714003,0.00048562608,0.000023803237,0.00022543798,0.0001941545,0.00071060046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003017022,0.00007439604,0.000044300064,0.000406981,0.00017311162,0.00012151843,0.00009757258,0.00009762935,0.00038341997],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054875556,0.000011922867,0.991016,3.928595e-7,0.0000023275798,0.0000038769576,0.00009863499,0.000019304907,0.0019384169,0.000032770527,0.0012205773,0.005600943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031352587,0.00009615051,0.9864466,0.00001107752,0.0000015553244,0.0000011969214,0.000043072178,0.000037070844,0.00052467396,0.00013874043,0.012255413,0.00013091501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018401947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5619819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058869796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027075754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9881346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508993631","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.022","title":"Phylogenetic regionalization of marine plants reveals close evolutionary affinities among disjunct temperate assemblages","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine and coastal plant biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Phylogenetic tree; Disjunct; Biological dispersal; Ecology; Phylogenetic diversity; Biology; Temperate climate; Niche; Evolutionary biology; Geography; Population","score_opus":0.038909443133616536,"score_gpt":0.21679601220465528,"score_spread":0.17788656907103872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508993631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944571,0.00010779828,0.00011750974,0.00043066786,0.00010507587,0.0001465191,0.0001706627,0.00003750155,0.004427159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99623233,0.0005555893,0.00015371272,0.00026994984,0.00007921585,0.000003366862,0.0009858466,0.0000017374035,0.0017182233],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898505,0.00019818678,0.00029470533,0.00023053492,0.0001145554,0.00017697453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991707,0.00042901238,0.00016140957,0.000114185656,0.00007543295,0.00004923682],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021376568,0.000120424986,0.00018144368,0.000057399357,0.0000758884,0.000009206591,0.00012532616,0.00013437272,0.001295501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020168697,0.00006596334,0.00004241541,0.00010205478,0.00021528726,0.00011549208,0.000033058845,0.00004003472,0.000043856577],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013632503,0.000014893626,0.97250676,0.0000085361,0.000011359521,0.0000050323392,0.0000059699255,0.0000052608334,0.0057065096,0.0005779541,0.0011717249,0.019849662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020551968,0.00026119952,0.988334,0.000024067185,0.0000046783734,0.000015152947,0.000019966901,0.0001441733,0.00040893932,0.009214158,0.0012510451,0.00011712117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010395988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008357533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01973254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000037500608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027472377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510852584","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.11.024","title":"Corrigendum to “One step ahead of the plow: Using cropland conversion risk to guide Sprague's pipit conservation in the northern Great Plains” [Biol. Conserv. 191 (2015) 739–749]","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Plough; Geography; Forestry; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06502875682165701,"score_gpt":0.26222875855287797,"score_spread":0.19720000173122096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510852584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755248,0.00014895867,0.00082520704,0.00992507,0.0046688174,0.0029026722,0.0003761796,0.000056095567,0.0055722343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80382514,0.0011335873,0.005359444,0.08162465,0.002958928,0.0007695728,0.0042831106,0.00026710817,0.09977845],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962506,0.0008449328,0.00085246464,0.00076051935,0.000796783,0.0004946548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809784,0.00021350272,0.0006282152,0.00077087496,0.00012380812,0.00016576413],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017850628,0.00046120517,0.0005761157,0.000104748025,0.0003771561,0.000082142345,0.0009859733,0.00054251426,0.0002377593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006736153,0.0002658587,0.00015247357,0.0007491784,0.0003398812,0.00012502022,0.00060252193,0.00055411836,0.00021548358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014755469,0.00007521259,0.41869187,0.000023576022,0.000020866632,0.0000061859614,0.0002017954,0.0001494539,0.00023781272,0.000020511505,0.5798807,0.00054440636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052358216,0.00026876354,0.38134658,0.00017251361,0.00006170049,0.0000039517217,0.00019945612,0.0016937316,0.00003201978,0.00010191559,0.61527693,0.00031884288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025733482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022379573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17169961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005136005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011377707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2538503382","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.001","title":"When natural habitat fails to enhance biological pest control – Five hypotheses","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Insect-Plant Interactions and Control","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":599,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Basic Energy Sciences; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Cotton Research and Development Corporation; Seventh Framework Programme; Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Habitat; Biodiversity; Ecology; Pest control; Biological pest control; PEST analysis; Agriculture; Natural (archaeology); Integrated pest management; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem; Agroforestry; Biology","score_opus":0.027881173837331713,"score_gpt":0.24037885896285202,"score_spread":0.2124976851255203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2538503382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750256,0.00010386871,0.00028392888,0.023044314,0.00031370204,0.00047989187,0.00017548223,0.00017084356,0.00040239334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909169,0.000038809674,0.00017908137,0.0074578463,0.00039015798,0.00014296448,0.000057948146,0.0000012191914,0.0008150766],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828255,0.00025723386,0.00035368145,0.0005205317,0.000153786,0.0004322331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745667,0.001975324,0.00013254557,0.00008850438,0.00021106486,0.0001358765],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027949444,0.00023651398,0.00030297245,0.000020953938,0.00024757523,0.00009932487,0.00032326032,0.00020920944,0.0010427558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009975933,0.00006596011,0.00014948283,0.00016935205,0.000115166185,0.00024109628,0.000060060094,0.0001301531,0.0005721682],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004297229,0.000074406176,0.03680627,9.2541114e-7,0.000019177794,0.000005884531,0.000021384902,2.5894894e-7,0.88780516,0.0010351436,0.0036503132,0.070151374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004967273,0.001846153,0.8346613,0.00006986292,0.000013118165,0.00002661826,0.00022050085,0.00006040861,0.013541177,0.0029790378,0.14549658,0.00058849074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002688025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066098425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87426394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005577619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001102773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546792435","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.039","title":"Optimizing land use decision-making to sustain Brazilian agricultural profits, biodiversity and ecosystem services","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; 3M Foundation; Nature Conservancy; Dow Chemical Company","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Sustainability; Biodiversity; Business; Agriculture; Land use; Environmental resource management; Landscape planning; Profit (economics); Habitat; Agricultural productivity; Natural resource economics; Ecosystem; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.0854526160154626,"score_gpt":0.21777752187927588,"score_spread":0.1323249058638133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546792435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99583244,0.00008840401,0.0020446945,0.0013915006,0.00008622911,0.0002551681,0.00015385538,0.000031521544,0.00011619438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965344,0.0000802693,0.0026174125,0.000649311,0.00002767248,0.000009011014,0.000023373626,0.0000029051823,0.000055666067],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999195,0.000021805072,0.00028282538,0.00032763422,0.000019501284,0.00015326924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994775,0.00019485418,0.00015182326,0.000099072386,0.000016545024,0.000060228704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003086979,0.000100388024,0.00017185937,0.000057948917,0.00012800065,0.000073423456,0.0000888613,0.000100297766,0.00011384391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012571676,0.0000689009,0.000033069755,0.000067648536,0.00002361739,0.00040039426,0.000100747224,0.0000306566,0.000320457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024263038,0.000010422587,0.99572283,0.00000723495,0.000008498568,5.51151e-7,0.0000979851,0.000017593251,0.00020383956,0.0022472613,0.00014261017,0.0015168813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027104327,0.000063006264,0.9950983,0.000039250463,0.0000021944156,0.000001704015,0.00015744477,0.00019686476,0.000032063963,0.0012465117,0.0027484754,0.00014315177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009122815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012269977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026058652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014000185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000030679125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41189334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549402100","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.11.002","title":"Physical footprint of oil and gas infrastructure, not anthropogenic noise, reduces nesting success of some grassland songbirds","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Alberta; University of Manitoba; Cenovus Energy","keywords":"Sparrow; Grassland; Environmental science; Ecology; Nest (protein structural motif); Wildlife; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.040024043272605184,"score_gpt":0.30084294037177595,"score_spread":0.2608188970991708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549402100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99880767,0.00014444567,0.00011551878,0.00077642815,0.000024299055,0.000041478303,0.000019944566,0.000009821655,0.00006037391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891335,0.00049643905,0.0003952339,0.000065680615,0.00005653978,0.0000074995846,0.000025484604,0.000005500512,0.00003425337],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993121,0.00008507054,0.00022880746,0.0001932675,0.00007463813,0.00010608586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941736,0.00006591093,0.00017416848,0.00017371017,0.00012780572,0.000041018677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012091501,0.00010072005,0.00016772264,0.000020405603,0.000045167504,0.0000054948164,0.00014797457,0.0001239387,0.000008384495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023936815,0.000060781058,0.000055154997,0.00005693578,0.00041254124,0.000006005469,0.0001478676,0.00004564833,6.9311983e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116897456,0.000044931247,0.12645,0.000009768863,0.0000083141185,1.4168596e-7,0.000007026205,3.1077633e-7,0.84021604,0.00073915196,0.000012682256,0.03239475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027815814,0.00029606334,0.4605439,0.000018453822,0.000009336342,0.000002370906,0.000018977158,0.0000144542,0.5380614,0.00032459828,0.00035459656,0.00007769113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033622055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008285554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3340939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005499463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003084417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24785796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2551371737","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.037","title":"Importance of the matrix in determining small-mammal assemblages in an Amazonian forest-savanna mosaic","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Evolution and Paleontology Studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Ecology; Frugivore; Habitat; Ordination; Mammal; Amazonian; Biology; Context (archaeology); Insectivore; Amazon rainforest","score_opus":0.07114410386217594,"score_gpt":0.27519424622492805,"score_spread":0.2040501423627521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2551371737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979303,0.00017233388,0.000025403855,0.0013690399,0.00008405043,0.00011662518,0.000014171809,0.000013525558,0.00027455733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936527,0.00004247386,0.00021573034,0.00030637693,0.000016570437,0.0000027482229,0.000010547408,7.468432e-7,0.00003954831],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916667,0.00019591079,0.0002519499,0.00016453378,0.00005742383,0.00016348461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941254,0.0003242357,0.00010734436,0.000106774474,0.000024878585,0.000024258958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003332755,0.00007398491,0.00013258598,0.000040172086,0.000048098645,0.0000053673666,0.00014968135,0.00008761753,0.000056663877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003241134,0.00003571307,0.000026197562,0.00015862979,0.00015568946,0.00008768413,0.0000113633605,0.00006287145,0.0000066620264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031660962,0.000008470921,0.99608743,0.0000026603734,0.0000014778028,0.0000034264556,0.000044341137,0.000020495763,0.0004495157,0.0001264381,0.000014487858,0.003209575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022300458,0.00010296947,0.99777573,0.000021748232,0.0000013369014,0.000002359339,0.00006032612,0.0008911033,0.000039331313,0.0006977954,0.00012140182,0.000062895815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004610575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33024764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3297866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004884047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024267907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6819736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554533380","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.035","title":"Integrative conservation of riparian zones","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Ministry of Environment; Society for Conservation Biology","keywords":"Riparian zone; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geography; Recreation; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Habitat","score_opus":0.03174077326032105,"score_gpt":0.2394090165952011,"score_spread":0.20766824333488007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554533380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98298997,0.000016416148,0.008370479,0.005583881,0.000049847604,0.00011449071,0.000008310133,0.000037621856,0.0028289885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99769455,0.000039672035,0.00078114617,0.0011321494,0.000011064762,0.000016380141,0.000016801985,0.0000022272675,0.00030599392],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934846,0.00006833154,0.00021141708,0.0001788107,0.00008419289,0.00010878282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995682,0.00019556822,0.00009923285,0.00008550128,0.00002174261,0.000029725827],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020869746,0.00008121326,0.0001197011,0.000015044724,0.000050281,0.0000024126643,0.00010275254,0.000112824164,0.0025628894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019469393,0.00004134753,0.000030073154,0.00012709045,0.0003967503,0.00016107448,0.00002244269,0.000036842583,0.00012518717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087523054,0.00005722677,0.8969637,0.0000025758009,0.0000073488377,9.800893e-7,0.00007630349,0.0000019603292,0.092448145,0.005080347,0.0010851553,0.0041887173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038252282,0.00025848957,0.9470006,0.000020251186,0.0000077757,0.0000013888983,0.00002931603,0.000074035954,0.023552084,0.009608669,0.018954512,0.0001103131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014864239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016251284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068896055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002099244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009449692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557811647","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.006","title":"Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Waterloo; University of Victoria; University of Saskatchewan; University of Guelph; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Conservation psychology; Reflexivity; Conservation science; Sociology; Salient; Behavioural sciences; Management science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social science; Ecology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.06325914652177446,"score_gpt":0.3071131222302789,"score_spread":0.24385397570850448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557811647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97193015,0.0000030827318,0.003430823,0.02198358,0.000097779404,0.00045659457,0.000007542966,0.000069114045,0.0020213346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932776,0.0000044256367,0.0009393792,0.0054013627,0.00003229409,0.000052433224,0.000011902456,0.0000068279355,0.00027377022],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846894,0.00011970798,0.00031935054,0.000523976,0.0002685223,0.000299504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932116,0.00020611286,0.00012612392,0.00015928705,0.000036916088,0.00015039108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009586429,0.00015205347,0.00013940847,0.00006242009,0.0009524783,0.0000672062,0.00014561371,0.00010884857,0.00046073552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089495385,0.00010230719,0.00003116766,0.00041202,0.0012366371,0.0004398269,0.00023169952,0.00008686138,0.00004961996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021029988,0.000047087884,0.47816816,0.0000030116141,0.0000021381904,3.5192127e-7,0.00038468436,4.0357597e-7,0.4871852,0.030580783,0.0012235569,0.0023836016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003781992,0.00018627857,0.97566986,0.000013873159,0.0000059747003,0.0000018024972,0.0020175797,0.00017767651,0.0032172268,0.013593819,0.004509338,0.0002283503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036839704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011799546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49750173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010981181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041233907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73257893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565632709","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.011","title":"Recent increases in human pressure and forest loss threaten many Natural World Heritage Sites","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Wildlife; Biosphere; Geography; National park; World heritage; Natural (archaeology); Environmental protection; Biodiversity; Ecology; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Biology; Habitat; Archaeology; Tourism","score_opus":0.03235157782435898,"score_gpt":0.22541744828170668,"score_spread":0.1930658704573477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565632709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99471956,0.00029782188,0.000010462433,0.003737397,0.000021791326,0.00025073224,0.000009925423,0.00004496415,0.0009073615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996938,0.00022089772,0.00009517243,0.0008372363,0.000021067039,0.000012355568,0.000030282343,0.000003028852,0.0018419521],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991589,0.00009140411,0.00016016101,0.00029321626,0.00012083343,0.00017548056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996491,0.00010098737,0.00006354574,0.00012577725,0.000011869116,0.000048688336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000207952,0.00011389109,0.00011242269,0.00004261977,0.0001490144,0.000027753818,0.00013421847,0.00006184783,0.0007814238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008590879,0.00006764176,0.000023705972,0.00019320514,0.0002749211,0.00013111769,0.0002810084,0.000054466193,0.00003474803],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041248113,0.000052740423,0.9910201,0.000004643415,0.000007549291,0.000006791777,0.000027906788,0.0000022557017,0.00403431,0.0001938106,0.00061554054,0.003993102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039734723,0.00004946833,0.9493807,0.000016550464,0.000009509008,0.0000010574231,0.00004047783,0.00008020707,0.00007962749,0.00072166696,0.049101412,0.00012195656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082714687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041978895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04848587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005314893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000024443161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8556043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587274389","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.015","title":"Ecosystem implications of conserving endemic versus eradicating introduced large herbivores in the Galapagos Archipelago","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Herbivore; Productivity; Archipelago; Ecosystem; Ecology; Tortoise; Vegetation (pathology); Biodiversity; Biology; Introduced species","score_opus":0.06594068941072828,"score_gpt":0.2945076214287655,"score_spread":0.22856693201803724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587274389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98887545,0.000031974774,0.0001756501,0.007798455,0.00011715975,0.00033717765,0.000018089164,0.000026081258,0.0026199692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986987,0.000019251213,0.0003288512,0.00076262694,0.000048403308,0.00008421254,0.000037993494,0.000003950215,0.000016023507],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868417,0.00032902646,0.0003589341,0.00029663483,0.00010530772,0.00022591498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835575,0.0006203511,0.00038229304,0.0005925445,0.00001982653,0.000029222967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010583993,0.00011515957,0.00015560031,0.000024220204,0.0004465559,0.00003223436,0.0007116968,0.00014981611,0.00017803324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012064598,0.00007728902,0.0000505083,0.00010719826,0.00026555144,0.00015247536,0.00017409053,0.00017961263,0.000044562672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092563554,0.000051299245,0.9662745,0.0000058836185,0.000006412181,6.8748096e-7,0.00026637668,0.00000609065,0.023191843,0.008136699,0.0002545042,0.001713125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005194271,0.00008031135,0.99347335,0.000015515798,0.0000069241955,0.0000036680754,0.00024903202,0.0004551919,0.0006242643,0.0030855837,0.0013910398,0.00009569702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000434785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030454872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027198829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051747596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002036094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34345922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588858606","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.005","title":"Future extinction risk of wetland plants is higher from individual patch loss than total area reduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Wetland; Extinction debt; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Habitat destruction; Habitat; Woodland; Ecology; Biodiversity; Habitat fragmentation; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.03721698492672075,"score_gpt":0.24714930784417083,"score_spread":0.20993232291745006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588858606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99688,0.000031099105,0.00010201741,0.00140089,0.0005437649,0.00012437196,0.0001408134,0.00002228869,0.00075477693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897337,0.0001766251,0.0002710112,0.00010850189,0.00013696193,0.00001389525,0.00013655676,0.0000028668308,0.00018021702],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926686,0.000084633844,0.0001810892,0.0002421962,0.00011208333,0.00011314552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993593,0.00006712626,0.0003474403,0.00018208686,0.000016220563,0.00002781226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018998017,0.00009726106,0.00013217916,0.000012178082,0.00044215983,0.000020614547,0.00013404818,0.00020182767,0.00088887406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000071741284,0.00007171222,0.000041145904,0.000029989282,0.00028902388,0.00017542916,0.000117891694,0.00011488893,0.00005528646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071682014,0.000042601812,0.99461013,0.000001109566,0.000031692187,8.7236606e-7,0.00019411225,0.00001145098,0.0024634458,0.000052360996,0.0008433971,0.0016771426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029448365,0.00009507373,0.99443936,0.0000044492817,0.000019651246,0.0000019463712,0.00010962004,0.0002487719,0.00056676747,0.0033551846,0.00077375205,0.00009095892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093311945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000599395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033028238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028621876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004091688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97325474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590507560","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.01.022","title":"Pan-Holarctic assessment of post-release mortality of angled Atlantic salmon Salmo salar","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ocean Tracking Network; Dalhousie University; Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Salmo; Fishery; Catch and release; Fishing; Range (aeronautics); Holarctic; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Population; Salmonidae; Recreational fishing; Ecology; Demography","score_opus":0.05053014126790042,"score_gpt":0.3027121543760632,"score_spread":0.2521820131081628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590507560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943494,0.00000635778,0.00010501223,0.0014306782,0.00007377815,0.00025591397,0.00000806855,0.000018354825,0.0037524437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998895,0.00005013633,0.00046702003,0.0004823228,0.000008973628,0.000016916843,0.00002660536,0.0000026719413,0.00005036704],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991667,0.00010277183,0.00025661185,0.00020861653,0.00012944106,0.00013584048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991835,0.00010461167,0.00034448234,0.00031287974,0.000028964712,0.000025571842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043993953,0.00009164547,0.00020776069,0.00001505065,0.00020692045,0.00000930739,0.00024013034,0.00008867712,0.00045508475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005442684,0.0000685668,0.00005491841,0.000046383517,0.00049664,0.00014431168,0.00030365403,0.000069097,0.000019582421],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002514729,0.00014610705,0.9874429,0.000020327025,0.000032928678,0.000003406255,0.000012804228,0.0000054681095,0.010535809,0.0009198084,0.0006153184,0.00023998583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025122197,0.0002484909,0.99779415,0.000009194247,0.00003236621,3.8057163e-7,0.00002810603,0.00026146593,0.00033470278,0.0006518424,0.0003103929,0.00007768257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014423039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009709035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010351264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034270553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008085783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4982859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606141457","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.03.021","title":"Can protected areas really maintain mammalian diversity? Insights from a nestedness analysis of the Colorado Plateau","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Park Service; McGill University","keywords":"Nestedness; Biodiversity; Biome; Geography; Ecology; Species richness; Range (aeronautics); Plateau (mathematics); Beta diversity; Ecosystem; Biology","score_opus":0.03153232430352467,"score_gpt":0.22502738117378981,"score_spread":0.19349505687026514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606141457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99240357,0.000002728283,0.000109113156,0.006578381,0.00009214741,0.0003576381,0.000037357895,0.000026381716,0.0003926923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998434,0.000002511311,0.0001555549,0.001156795,0.000014397181,0.00002489068,0.00008890064,0.0000026764776,0.00012026987],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989516,0.00024713794,0.0002201339,0.00028491233,0.00015852765,0.00013768821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989279,0.00012815223,0.00040313046,0.00046010036,0.000033823555,0.00004687409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018195708,0.00011138633,0.00020740906,0.000034385568,0.00094913004,0.00002922918,0.00057988224,0.00021230485,0.000348567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044248818,0.00007268676,0.00009341307,0.00033145194,0.0005199272,0.000143295,0.000606633,0.00011597644,0.000016079599],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092904294,0.000044542572,0.9955392,9.75204e-7,0.00008462609,0.0000034292846,0.00014896691,0.000060077764,0.002371536,0.0013146307,0.00013385952,0.00020523401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023812322,0.00005646315,0.99202824,0.000005793786,0.00013978341,3.3985455e-7,0.000068388006,0.0013796209,0.00025276202,0.005523248,0.000206183,0.00010103887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016572269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02356485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069925827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009886555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023097562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99425256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621125942","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.05.026","title":"An ecological connectivity network maintains genetic diversity of a flagship wildflower, Pulsatilla vulgaris","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ecology; Genetic diversity; Biology; Biological dispersal; Seed dispersal; Population; Grassland; Demography","score_opus":0.10913304189919054,"score_gpt":0.24878147490161334,"score_spread":0.1396484330024228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621125942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978925,0.00006127868,0.000013070468,0.001086116,0.00006946233,0.00019929568,0.000064534484,0.000059127186,0.0005546115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990076,0.00010822628,0.000167071,0.00040527733,0.00024301712,0.00000837431,0.00003986845,4.6904896e-7,0.000020110569],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988493,0.00018681148,0.00020755641,0.00032730386,0.0001333675,0.00029571494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912,0.00036975965,0.00025662128,0.000070431604,0.00009461148,0.000088604356],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041464737,0.00014774455,0.00028282686,0.000004857725,0.0015074984,0.00006191229,0.0004727245,0.00020411433,0.00018944322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044303885,0.00005602628,0.00009520005,0.000073441275,0.00030128835,0.00012539687,0.00042558764,0.00010743589,0.0000106245025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010809924,0.00014930783,0.96085244,0.0000020467176,0.000013763596,0.0000073966094,0.000014563418,0.0000029963196,0.032246027,0.0009190196,0.0003239989,0.0053603123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013060724,0.00086628326,0.9934399,0.0000082874985,0.000010577786,0.0000026193366,0.000049559672,0.00022153022,0.00019961625,0.0035166314,0.0013985917,0.00015580577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009639724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005659429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032587424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020227337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000056755903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625865863","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.06.005","title":"Spatial modelling of non-target exposure to anticoagulant rodenticides can inform mitigation options in two boreal predators inhabiting areas with intensive oil and gas development","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Secrétariat Général pour les Affaires Régionales, Etat en Région Aquitaine; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Alberta Environment and Parks; Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute","keywords":"Marten; Boreal; Taiga; Predation; Ecology; Rodent; Biology; Geography; Habitat","score_opus":0.045945779924293384,"score_gpt":0.27199826584906656,"score_spread":0.22605248592477317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625865863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971915,0.00000413031,0.0019688588,0.00051473686,0.00001943052,0.00011474803,0.000005726078,0.000008691959,0.00017220185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99291205,0.000015736554,0.006858516,0.00013089129,0.0000075200546,0.000033052554,0.000027090538,0.0000025944755,0.000012555128],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935174,0.000020286645,0.00021850351,0.00018289393,0.00008657833,0.00013999597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996419,0.00003641514,0.00014792246,0.000082115206,0.00005118222,0.000040475876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017621985,0.000093006995,0.00014991911,0.000026357862,0.0002632841,0.000019152538,0.00008153214,0.00005214623,0.000012460488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012259536,0.00006714703,0.0000114682325,0.00004420329,0.00025753284,0.00012372465,0.00014547567,0.00006744786,0.0000025401607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006234917,0.000024769146,0.99169475,0.0000047708445,0.0000052698642,0.0000032703945,0.0006748855,0.00080548704,0.0025735525,0.00005432091,0.0000035649234,0.00409299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002646227,0.00019093457,0.9930247,0.00004465387,0.000006964858,0.0000026319374,0.00047708757,0.0040657306,0.0017137006,0.00010101803,0.00001198887,0.00009598077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002991544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010884231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007892687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054540465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018333636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60736567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W264085230","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.016","title":"Climate change modifies risk of global biodiversity loss due to land-cover change","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":300,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Global Institute for Water Security","funders":"Australian Research Council; Queensland Government; Australian Government; Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Australian Research Council","keywords":"Climate change; Biodiversity; Land cover; Land use, land-use change and forestry; Habitat destruction; Global change; Environmental resource management; Environmental change; Effects of global warming; Global warming; Land use; Habitat; Geography; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.1686409134940137,"score_gpt":0.27912288176162753,"score_spread":0.11048196826761383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W264085230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99348134,0.000035083925,0.00005182832,0.0018604243,0.00012745537,0.00028514428,0.001790234,0.000051381536,0.0023171126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975313,0.00010993595,0.00005087353,0.002045946,0.000031673317,0.00003206062,0.00019137123,0.0000011740117,0.0000056439158],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991763,0.00008074257,0.00013779796,0.00021485818,0.00017648557,0.00021379277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995797,0.000025112866,0.000099730256,0.00012802919,0.000034626162,0.00013279953],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027138626,0.000102706515,0.00014707222,0.0000099047775,0.00007428925,0.000013357158,0.00014504604,0.00010715124,0.0031273293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001418948,0.00007839472,0.000047141846,0.0002618801,0.00014881768,0.00014609349,0.00025614424,0.00004233269,0.002511919],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010516202,0.000056362638,0.9947168,0.000002916176,0.000003063126,0.0000037754942,0.00011988002,0.000001600435,0.00009998572,0.00055092893,0.0037006186,0.00063891226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002929132,0.00016806167,0.9886345,0.0000038144108,0.000008060806,0.0000025741222,0.00018098048,0.000053612865,0.00012428976,0.00014723571,0.010275212,0.000108739725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028023166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036051648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065745935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027753907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003057336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99826473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754241638","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.08.004","title":"Distinguishing reintroduction from recolonization with genetic testing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fluidigm (Canada); Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Victoria; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Government of Alberta","funders":"Environment Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Royal Canadian Geographical Society; Alberta Environment and Parks; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Biology; Evolutionary biology; Zoology; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.06514497885216944,"score_gpt":0.22425735943110514,"score_spread":0.1591123805789357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754241638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958695,0.000009977473,0.0007022366,0.0010041987,0.00010012745,0.00014348332,0.000006604095,0.00005382917,0.0021100505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.940115,0.000011558605,0.059486102,0.00019986875,0.0000687966,0.000007812738,0.000030090616,0.0000037807802,0.00007702788],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992877,0.00003906568,0.000107966196,0.00031522926,0.00012367478,0.00012635297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944097,0.000086510896,0.00018837728,0.00024262964,0.000010553793,0.00003094792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010310359,0.000091446724,0.000083853025,0.0000061634637,0.000881441,0.00007655673,0.00019104322,0.00005911592,0.00021317885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010585741,0.0000696531,0.000012941568,0.000045212168,0.00034928593,0.00019278009,0.00023011302,0.000066021756,0.0001658445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017047678,0.00001540123,0.98018783,6.963218e-7,0.0000046581704,0.0000031851825,0.000033274802,0.00007403568,0.014706786,0.0000054267116,0.00038067866,0.0045709633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001427589,0.00010240031,0.99677163,0.000008590673,0.000009562089,0.0000015491594,0.000032271088,0.00038687777,0.00079764694,0.00030591563,0.0013305297,0.00011023749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016714295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017721535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058783866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011660691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000013406602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67794204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756258351","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.07.013","title":"Conservation potential of apex predator tourism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Tourism; Wildlife; Apex predator; Outreach; Wildlife conservation; Environmental resource management; Predator; Ecotourism; Wildlife tourism; Environmental planning; Enforcement; Geography; Habitat; Business; Ecology; Predation; Political science; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.031708486017377746,"score_gpt":0.24585704124700025,"score_spread":0.2141485552296225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756258351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98847663,0.000008868211,0.0011030597,0.006884021,0.00023599724,0.0002503951,0.000010047265,0.000044889362,0.0029860751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99619114,0.000016352058,0.0012151867,0.0019950941,0.00006538734,0.000027719492,0.000048439488,0.000005081458,0.0004356047],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897075,0.00010602998,0.0003167686,0.00027608345,0.0001540407,0.00017633669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989905,0.00009071191,0.00043035825,0.0003967039,0.000040218343,0.000051544317],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040565655,0.000116902425,0.00016678781,0.000019039802,0.00042165892,0.000035320663,0.00035745898,0.00022716666,0.0013602967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006645783,0.00009808533,0.00006103784,0.000059204584,0.00051202625,0.00038803704,0.0001920196,0.00010076907,0.00018196374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008055548,0.00006156249,0.97261435,0.0000035703065,0.000009142026,0.000003424583,0.000016216578,0.000013028147,0.01685333,0.0010541197,0.0075744796,0.0017162194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037249344,0.00012428335,0.9890799,0.0000068039235,0.000011461014,0.0000032998053,0.000015606678,0.0016756254,0.0011618616,0.0032873552,0.0041430066,0.0001182943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064545556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015665613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016465558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003987849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021057127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780997251","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.11.022","title":"Prioritizing actions for the recovery of endangered species: Emergent insights from Greater Sage-grouse simulation modeling","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada","funders":"Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program; Parks Canada; Environment Canada; University of Washington","keywords":"Population; Endangered species; Habitat; Ecology; Population model; Population viability analysis; Critically endangered; Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science; Demography","score_opus":0.16643797039436545,"score_gpt":0.29419083893413916,"score_spread":0.12775286853977372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780997251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93014574,0.00003636326,0.06804082,0.0007429239,0.00017320675,0.00038691115,0.000022882607,0.000017097886,0.0004340424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984952,0.0001194415,0.000803509,0.00023061033,0.00009380183,0.000045166034,0.000028364471,0.0000036723086,0.00018022588],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944377,0.000028766664,0.00017535858,0.00017221112,0.000090844565,0.000089027795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994456,0.00015802369,0.00013017283,0.00023454569,0.000011839748,0.000019807532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010937896,0.00007192594,0.00008909451,0.000010251577,0.00043991863,0.000044082277,0.00015990387,0.000053329168,0.00012817941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015404649,0.000042636344,0.000061507024,0.00002665016,0.00006955275,0.00016503462,0.00009079365,0.000036387162,0.000011587005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058177207,0.00023490725,0.62970173,0.0000328442,0.00018320054,0.0000030881752,0.0011589183,0.17337027,0.08626372,0.0007312138,0.0017049378,0.106033415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028676706,0.00008283176,0.5913277,0.00001626917,0.000024457433,6.859937e-8,0.00012455862,0.38871458,0.00032944168,0.0019791578,0.017015181,0.00009894219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000642322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001726658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21534431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039758488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000023430878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3383543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781940036","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.021","title":"Is local biodiversity declining or not? A summary of the debate over analysis of species richness time trends","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts; National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center; National Sleep Foundation; Alzheimer Society of B.C.; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Species richness; Argument (complex analysis); Global biodiversity; Geography; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.10247378043226607,"score_gpt":0.28131498612302647,"score_spread":0.1788412056907604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781940036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99622846,0.0000046890464,0.000082399994,0.00062051177,0.000035657675,0.00003845521,0.00030501123,0.0000126712075,0.0026721454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794483,0.000012614647,0.00002382376,0.0012954478,0.000006978895,0.000001295785,0.00007330559,9.04243e-7,0.0006407997],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993192,0.000066896224,0.00018978784,0.00015970846,0.00015912567,0.00010528429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953514,0.00009361379,0.0001602407,0.00015153592,0.000027892218,0.000031588206],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017848234,0.00006980277,0.0001663879,0.00003707019,0.00010071349,0.000006176883,0.0001845844,0.00008210325,0.09232499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009613348,0.000038930822,0.000120724995,0.0010976366,0.0008231692,0.000046893143,0.00018158302,0.00003390987,0.00009889777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016205665,0.000036081878,0.9781491,0.0000014366718,0.000048381753,2.923814e-7,0.000107138905,0.0000021342464,0.011251128,0.00006750773,0.009784255,0.0003904727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001329979,0.00008205217,0.98043597,0.0000028245363,0.000083289706,1.9960862e-7,0.00023516544,0.000785554,0.006315385,0.0000061854557,0.011862506,0.000057891626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033193917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038088477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09222609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087840286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000060005814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9085047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789856468","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.014","title":"Community assembly and the sustainability of habitat offsetting targets in the first compensation lake in the oil sands region in Alberta, Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Natural Resources; University of Alberta","funders":"Mitacs; Canadian Natural Resources Limited","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Trophic level; Ecosystem; Benthic zone; Geography; Sustainability; Lake ecosystem; Productivity; Biodiversity; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.021988947359857295,"score_gpt":0.2274147365212104,"score_spread":0.2054257891613531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789856468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9310517,0.0000066866405,0.000008693248,0.06658776,0.000017865279,0.00023068135,6.3700935e-7,0.0000019173317,0.0020940688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939028,0.000015614483,0.00000803147,0.0059990473,0.0000050818635,0.000045187822,0.000008883546,7.9408784e-7,0.000014562772],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985352,0.0009872573,0.00019125166,0.000096215445,0.00007679318,0.00011325791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980615,0.0017004054,0.000082242404,0.00013716755,0.000014037568,0.0000046467826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022722974,0.000058306377,0.00010013645,0.000011882031,0.0002815184,0.0000075305147,0.0001957381,0.00004456331,0.000010317012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001172615,0.000027440663,0.000010065472,0.00020102553,0.0006555864,0.000056856334,0.0001245906,0.00015420484,5.553878e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006176619,0.000043356526,0.9936605,0.000007844064,0.0000014346622,8.796057e-7,0.0021564246,0.000015494285,0.000002001046,0.0012243659,0.0026220991,0.00020382258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003779008,0.000054890173,0.9898675,0.0000056134,0.0000021294381,5.9759697e-7,0.0034069961,0.00060343865,0.0000022543368,0.0027013714,0.0029426243,0.000034668046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4924327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5052046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008346971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000120150835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5109472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790329133","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.020","title":"Perils of recovering the Mexican wolf outside of its historical range","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Gray wolf; Subspecies; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Endangered species; Ecology; Canis; Biological dispersal; Population; Ethnology; Habitat; Biology; Demography; History","score_opus":0.054248731563149084,"score_gpt":0.24026745910153344,"score_spread":0.18601872753838436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790329133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98987865,0.00004469903,0.000319254,0.0020729299,0.000097775286,0.00012393783,0.0000025084505,0.000011646661,0.0074485675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99875236,0.000039985876,0.00022508315,0.00055619323,0.000049694143,0.0000068774393,0.0000018046641,0.0000018265958,0.00036618623],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946684,0.000055817887,0.00017184796,0.000113582704,0.0001060634,0.000085866894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970347,0.00006472904,0.00009259515,0.00010785318,0.000011680283,0.000019672314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026693332,0.000051118983,0.00009640273,0.000008704448,0.000050029656,0.0000032000444,0.00013179802,0.00003861921,0.00054999243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000115085146,0.00002807495,0.00003763965,0.00010874552,0.00014743488,0.0000384172,0.00008058374,0.00003166074,0.00003468644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010651641,0.00007643552,0.93420345,0.000012047147,0.000012292738,7.401882e-7,0.00028971734,0.00001470938,0.037851416,0.0008617008,0.012622173,0.013948784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014296999,0.00024479753,0.8839666,0.000008904929,0.0000061241726,4.0354246e-7,0.00003829346,0.00031991606,0.0021907594,0.00028338976,0.11273826,0.000059544418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000286618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047502548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10011609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060193495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002507801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60220313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793661659","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.010","title":"Missing native oyster (Ostrea edulis L.) beds in a European Marine Protected Area: Should there be widespread restorative management?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University Belfast; Queen's University; Scottish Funding Council; Marine Alliance for Science and Technology for Scotland; Heriot-Watt University","keywords":"Marine protected area; Oyster; Ostrea edulis; Fishery; Geography; Habitat; Marine habitats; Oceanography; Ecology; Biology; Geology","score_opus":0.08087597482161094,"score_gpt":0.28537381006064744,"score_spread":0.2044978352390365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793661659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78685147,0.000012496109,0.00017913588,0.0044189706,0.00004387517,0.00053502,0.00000532582,0.00006601699,0.20788772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99386275,0.000019109324,0.0021210108,0.0018433374,0.00006344643,0.000050157283,0.00004796562,0.000008183845,0.0019840498],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871945,0.00029030693,0.00023708161,0.0003785339,0.00015703753,0.00021756128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995867,0.00007728907,0.00010967975,0.00015005305,0.000033970562,0.00004231138],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033754497,0.00017951154,0.00015969569,0.00003316655,0.00017033289,0.00003455341,0.00016787324,0.000071141236,0.0010171465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002417108,0.00011626507,0.00004001142,0.00034763795,0.0003842843,0.00014154623,0.000467862,0.00013599564,0.00008724689],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025466745,0.00016490843,0.9500319,0.000013960728,0.000051046798,0.000047042715,0.001131457,0.0000019353936,0.011461591,0.0006009629,0.007506485,0.028734086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003580634,0.00026625933,0.95583457,0.000042770855,0.000009003049,0.0000016132273,0.00035794848,0.00007919341,0.0006254648,0.001097516,0.0411415,0.00018611288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044618535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015634235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2070113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009262776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003663468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793688915","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.02.007","title":"Forecasting the outcome of multiple effects of climate change on northern common eiders","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Windsor","funders":"Liber Ero Foundation; W. Garfield Weston Foundation; University of Windsor; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Mitacs; Carleton University; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Pew Charitable Trusts","keywords":"Eider; Climate change; Population; Ecology; Arctic; Wildlife; Avian clutch size; Biodiversity; Population size; Geography; Biology; Reproduction","score_opus":0.14380152268559337,"score_gpt":0.286762963364661,"score_spread":0.14296144067906763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793688915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968017,0.000024357632,0.000007682567,0.00031696958,0.000049573577,0.0003321165,0.000003648995,0.000012633893,0.0024513423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987433,0.000042427393,0.00011252446,0.0010354592,0.000030765226,0.000024872086,0.0000031121617,0.0000031726936,0.000004371223],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933887,0.000087458124,0.00021238448,0.00012687113,0.000105843355,0.00012857508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909246,0.0005736081,0.00017839688,0.00012407798,0.000015657697,0.000015779433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025809504,0.00007674111,0.00014810791,0.0000067036476,0.00009181973,0.0000025259073,0.00013373164,0.0000418811,0.000085765416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050819,0.00004203649,0.00004444196,0.00011837848,0.00028458034,0.00003406541,0.0002295642,0.000045950073,0.000034633955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004276139,0.000032017764,0.97788215,0.000022975677,0.0000040361174,4.2608067e-7,0.0000777714,0.000001071993,0.0006533823,0.00011370547,0.000016120524,0.021153603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014794507,0.00054438825,0.99599576,0.000020272164,0.0000058373294,3.7564936e-7,0.000020781516,0.0010934471,0.00095396716,0.00010580032,0.0010609662,0.00005045115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033607169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008099916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021103151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025114878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":7.458934e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5080421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799490002","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.029","title":"The threats endangering Australia's at-risk fauna","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Australian Research Council","keywords":"Threatened species; Fauna; Ecology; Habitat; Conservation-dependent species; Climate change; Near-threatened species; Biodiversity; Biology; Range (aeronautics); Umbrella species; Habitat destruction; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Species distribution; Geography","score_opus":0.13407824290013687,"score_gpt":0.307371809264064,"score_spread":0.17329356636392712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799490002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872819,0.000027780943,0.00004941787,0.0012476244,0.00013369911,0.00009926409,0.00002293879,0.00005163616,0.011085749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974685,0.0001318887,0.000033285574,0.00047433065,0.00005369405,0.000016648435,0.00003342417,0.0000022777804,0.0017859616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999375,0.00005611701,0.00011275593,0.00016664459,0.00010122217,0.00018827461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965465,0.00008858578,0.00006388709,0.0001357969,0.000012211745,0.000044895038],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002259703,0.0000708171,0.000051771436,0.0000035477808,0.0005097486,0.000030033796,0.00013153093,0.00006625311,0.03085646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012195182,0.000040230323,0.000032416454,0.00010947815,0.00044372093,0.000045923196,0.0001399256,0.0000513741,0.0042551346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051411553,0.00002059631,0.9400984,5.9788334e-7,0.000004857208,9.689761e-7,0.000055873406,3.3609365e-7,0.024136132,0.0025494867,0.025936265,0.007145086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007297882,0.00006812891,0.7717897,8.7744695e-7,0.0000020889483,0.0000016626425,0.000076168326,0.0000311914,0.002413348,0.00043873873,0.22504807,0.00005703304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010904201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1991118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002115742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000013979312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99652016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884062404","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.033","title":"Consequences of captive breeding: Fitness implications for wild-origin, hatchery-spawned Atlantic salmon kelts upon their return to the wild","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Dalhousie University; Ocean Tracking Network; University of Prince Edward Island; Cape Breton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation; Cape Breton University","keywords":"Hatchery; Fishery; Salmo; Biology; Broodstock; Fecundity; Semelparity and iteroparity; Captive breeding; Endangered species; Range (aeronautics); Zoology; Ecology; Aquaculture; Life history; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Population; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.07752344703875401,"score_gpt":0.28337858234819224,"score_spread":0.20585513530943822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884062404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9451271,0.000012129105,0.0026001236,0.05004814,0.00014495339,0.0008246544,0.000025184214,0.00004111835,0.0011765452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99508655,0.000029539196,0.0006237958,0.003774873,0.00006529627,0.0002207941,0.000028916036,0.0000040944146,0.00016614737],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991364,0.00007733581,0.00022078224,0.00029302487,0.00006334219,0.00020913049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916244,0.0004149473,0.00014701708,0.00017854587,0.000063061765,0.000033983983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044307558,0.00011962221,0.0001622954,0.000020454156,0.00038609863,0.000013194927,0.00027178857,0.00009810653,0.00011239475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004159614,0.00006943993,0.00004588815,0.00023160504,0.00073928194,0.00008778935,0.00015876195,0.000055525194,0.00004162958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012343729,0.000049190217,0.92773336,0.0000061481196,0.00003488773,1.6997046e-7,0.00041052018,0.00001201484,0.017983153,0.0050732004,0.047864873,0.00070901593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017129902,0.00055053877,0.9569766,0.000011649704,0.000018613064,0.0000013442418,0.0003116039,0.00014243896,0.0017072691,0.0070221485,0.032968372,0.00011815717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003800852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031490838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04995939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050387836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009682722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29695976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884266673","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.022","title":"Is habitat fragmentation good for biodiversity?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":725,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Liber Ero Foundation; Natural Environment Research Council; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Sight Research UK; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Habitat fragmentation; Habitat; Habitat destruction; Biodiversity; Fragmentation (computing); Ecology; Geography; Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.05068446110587485,"score_gpt":0.27090279169314246,"score_spread":0.2202183305872676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884266673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866076,0.000006613942,0.006165346,0.0045600105,0.00012516862,0.00021391032,0.000018730125,0.00003530562,0.0022672738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897027,0.000009514075,0.003111865,0.0068037654,0.000028128685,0.00002775965,0.000049180446,0.0000012353238,0.00026584277],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995389,0.000036903464,0.00009614733,0.00017358863,0.000046810426,0.000107640444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997035,0.00014053185,0.000054184045,0.0000539497,0.000026972068,0.000020816487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016852382,0.000056859913,0.000060471066,0.000011758273,0.00035272635,0.000007826351,0.000064110136,0.00007657349,0.00071282143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011591509,0.00004576338,0.00002962622,0.00008336216,0.00027745584,0.00009221322,0.000051002902,0.000031017607,0.00069355645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030469582,0.000024522886,0.9831571,0.0000014148147,0.000007461538,1.0964033e-7,0.00016949042,0.000002177096,0.0018648081,0.0011942261,0.013076301,0.00047192577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026896826,0.00032000543,0.9790373,0.000001126694,0.000007045083,3.71021e-7,0.00009665198,0.0012589343,0.0006413984,0.006020955,0.012270759,0.000076477765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002958758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002566476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048267287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004084682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000028259608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89144963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887624227","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.012","title":"Mapping relative extinction risk for biodiversity conservation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Endemism; Biodiversity; Taxon; Ecology; Phylogenetic diversity; Geography; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Phylogenetic tree; Taxonomic rank; Biology; Species diversity; Biodiversity hotspot","score_opus":0.05401210731511106,"score_gpt":0.2505131617290045,"score_spread":0.19650105441389346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887624227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9065623,0.000007840106,0.088801906,0.0023621235,0.00017601856,0.00031551602,0.000020599702,0.00006698958,0.0016866509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99255264,0.000026725,0.0050739404,0.001968619,0.00004800089,0.000039810508,0.00007534446,0.0000019823517,0.0002129153],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992467,0.00014184165,0.00016466016,0.00024745252,0.00005929458,0.00014001544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992458,0.00041593172,0.00017273579,0.00007537308,0.00006389979,0.0000262195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005180875,0.00008416607,0.00009353824,0.000024051227,0.00078832125,0.000009514721,0.00006848299,0.00013291101,0.00040928976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082792074,0.00007031798,0.000041562944,0.00017556225,0.00043493492,0.00019459432,0.00006884161,0.000083954554,0.0003879196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006649529,0.000024493218,0.9923779,0.0000016449551,0.000014491675,1.4001037e-7,0.0002836204,0.00001022738,0.0012462708,0.0009909179,0.004089016,0.0008948276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031673987,0.00023986193,0.95737493,0.0000022963686,0.000009413811,6.0228984e-7,0.00017452921,0.006759604,0.00012818216,0.012459303,0.022434752,0.00009976722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013403854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005251667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0859903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008802728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005606668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6063209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889904364","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.027","title":"Research advances and gaps in marine planning: towards a global database in systematic conservation planning","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Documentation; Marine conservation; Threatened species; Environmental resource management; Best practice; Environmental planning; Systematic review; Marine protected area; Computer science; Data science; Geography; Business; Ecology; Environmental science; Habitat; Political science; MEDLINE; Biology","score_opus":0.12361387301681934,"score_gpt":0.36738838035407173,"score_spread":0.2437745073372524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889904364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943099,0.00037454165,0.000046138113,0.00094016275,0.0000681001,0.0004869444,0.000006593217,0.000027319651,0.0037402692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99896413,0.000063919404,0.00047249426,0.0002804804,0.00003309454,0.0000967,0.00002834693,0.0000025462502,0.00005826154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855405,0.0003066606,0.00035077712,0.0003281396,0.00019694596,0.0002634429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946856,0.0002549923,0.000080975915,0.00012023045,0.000031076852,0.000044139677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014067633,0.00011036686,0.00023114152,0.000054271888,0.00011876045,0.000027972064,0.00011762148,0.00007251405,0.000073196825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008172315,0.00007994882,0.000012287383,0.00055376854,0.00026661952,0.00024018285,0.0005142634,0.00011892929,0.00003515875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000885946,0.000031579133,0.99768823,0.00033682436,0.0000021807834,0.00001498714,0.00013331525,0.0000030152996,0.00041612508,0.00035620353,0.00037071502,0.00055825524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031318015,0.00020180843,0.9932498,0.0005750254,0.0000020275943,0.000007859136,0.0005531741,0.0014928485,0.00003578496,0.0020073918,0.0014538659,0.0001072764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003267766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003595249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004654226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017403613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013043029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49399066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890665403","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.09.008","title":"Survey-based assessment of the frequency and potential impacts of recreation on polar bears","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Nunavut Research Institute; Government of Nunavut","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Ursus maritimus; Recreation; Visitor pattern; Arctic; Sea ice; Geography; Habitat; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.0567808071692044,"score_gpt":0.2925742690140691,"score_spread":0.23579346184486466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890665403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99807596,0.000015694603,0.000113014816,0.00037404927,0.000030875406,0.00016720963,0.000018187662,0.0000054251545,0.0011995544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998772,0.000025660802,0.00071624847,0.0004541099,0.0000094370625,0.0000030475285,0.00001186488,0.0000018035619,0.0000057732386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992738,0.0002219616,0.00016382824,0.00012649705,0.00013821897,0.0000757068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995897,0.00010356133,0.00014636612,0.00011026628,0.000030557632,0.000019581583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050127687,0.000059105925,0.000098495635,0.000007910279,0.00006714936,0.0000038173075,0.00008533685,0.000048295387,0.0003161594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000311763,0.000034263845,0.000026056661,0.0001431364,0.00030328924,0.00003257132,0.00009170651,0.000039568728,0.000003893324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022549992,0.000035918933,0.9754803,0.0000043050673,0.0000037088362,6.8882535e-8,0.000006107367,0.000002301422,0.02302397,0.00020888714,0.000110116765,0.0011017198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012785791,0.0005158684,0.99692893,0.000011646081,0.000004724965,1.5250762e-7,0.0000037413838,0.00037244262,0.001644009,0.00020621323,0.00014507717,0.00003932994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071378145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014712915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021448592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040053972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011930708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894607922","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.09.026","title":"A fence runs through it: A call for greater attention to the influence of fences on wildlife and ecosystems","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":196,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Conservation Association","funders":"","keywords":"Fencing; Wildlife; Fence (mathematics); Environmental resource management; Wildlife conservation; Ecosystem; Empirical evidence; Wildlife management; Geography; Environmental planning; Business; Ecology; Environmental science; Engineering; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.048044943536522174,"score_gpt":0.2689493773537956,"score_spread":0.22090443381727343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894607922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794221,0.000003460847,0.0008979533,0.018755667,0.000087134846,0.0005760184,0.000012014509,0.000018655226,0.00022699109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98452216,0.0000075445146,0.00060715736,0.014542285,0.000056172863,0.0001306874,0.0000084738,0.000002804733,0.0001226858],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914217,0.00010199894,0.00023090452,0.0002715959,0.000102916405,0.0001503865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941456,0.00024314695,0.00012246831,0.00014284888,0.000044892764,0.00003210862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004275093,0.00009416532,0.00011440999,0.000013233564,0.00022592832,0.00001541375,0.00015619186,0.000103429455,0.00006281774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003755561,0.000056328532,0.000027692864,0.0001594974,0.00033414923,0.00014518895,0.000065893946,0.000046387227,0.00009392981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001389594,0.000024068828,0.9869359,0.0000053152135,0.0000057630773,1.88661e-7,0.00029843242,0.000060723465,0.004289511,0.00090614735,0.006938813,0.00039618462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015951564,0.00079061714,0.98223567,0.00002717099,0.0000064288056,0.0000021491858,0.000059365313,0.0005663634,0.00024401647,0.0007940591,0.015032652,0.00008198233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004074572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000899441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008093839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028929722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009282162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22970109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899914305","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.10.016","title":"Distributional shifts in a biodiversity hotspot","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity hotspot; Hotspot (geology); Biodiversity; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Geology","score_opus":0.07863280051016845,"score_gpt":0.2591086841078112,"score_spread":0.18047588359764272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899914305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898928,0.000004471874,0.00008834671,0.0030293183,0.00006344591,0.00007810281,0.00010245984,0.000034851782,0.006706226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977402,0.000007861546,0.000034890792,0.0018978519,0.00001756823,0.000005770108,0.00026429284,6.5396966e-7,0.00003092747],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994515,0.000038740058,0.000097591146,0.00017083802,0.00009512224,0.00014618287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998186,0.00002920648,0.000031563897,0.000067391884,0.000012280635,0.000040962615],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014715386,0.000058100104,0.00005886131,0.000011151036,0.000094038216,0.00001181047,0.00009388252,0.00007379307,0.055603247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000108376604,0.000046689307,0.000022919488,0.00023391082,0.00032088198,0.00007172926,0.00009454828,0.00004479582,0.0033230847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038429822,0.00005527077,0.9716939,4.2659295e-7,8.3475317e-7,0.0000017237578,0.000020076819,1.0163418e-7,0.0044433274,0.002073616,0.021432988,0.00023932566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017348418,0.00006302504,0.93645424,0.0000011355602,7.7635576e-7,5.76775e-7,0.000076143624,0.000029875138,0.00030906853,0.00033566714,0.062491383,0.00006464488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004108193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066936185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05228016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026104372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000039847755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907399367","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.12.026","title":"Is habitat fragmentation bad for biodiversity?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":587,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Concordia University; ELUTIS Modelling and Consulting (Canada); University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa; Université de Sherbrooke; Okanagan University College; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Carleton University; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Habitat fragmentation; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat; Ecology; Biodiversity; Geography; Species richness; Habitat destruction; Extinction debt; Forest fragmentation; Landscape ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.05037802176210701,"score_gpt":0.27314630517010985,"score_spread":0.22276828340800284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907399367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98671824,0.000006549204,0.006552237,0.004763117,0.00012805194,0.00020618615,0.000017049873,0.000034107266,0.0015744591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887997,0.000010432332,0.0031575456,0.0076921815,0.00002793971,0.000026901955,0.000048420832,0.0000011983252,0.0002356607],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995426,0.000036693236,0.00009546618,0.00017264664,0.00004615271,0.00010646283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970436,0.00014134614,0.000052088697,0.0000535426,0.000027840468,0.000020791931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016929858,0.00005631644,0.000059959024,0.000012106455,0.00035557733,0.000007746311,0.00006349314,0.00007527323,0.00082136807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013384708,0.000045232933,0.000029317367,0.00008237361,0.0002966176,0.00009255351,0.00005058259,0.000030316949,0.0007325885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034275396,0.000021666374,0.98034483,0.0000012102648,0.0000068786626,1.16323314e-7,0.00017736002,0.0000023884768,0.0019725948,0.0009915044,0.015906703,0.00054044777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002473819,0.0002783272,0.97837555,0.0000011159729,0.0000063482207,3.389941e-7,0.0000788718,0.0012153948,0.00058340514,0.0077613816,0.011377424,0.00007447758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030973104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025263833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006769877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000408277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002777738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94161874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908086122","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2018.11.022","title":"Value-oriented criteria, indicators and targets for conservation and production: A multi-party approach to forest management planning","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Sustainable forest management; Environmental resource management; Forest management; Environmental planning; Sustainable management; Business; Sustainable development; Land use; Sustainability; Land-use planning; Geography; Ecology; Forestry; Environmental science","score_opus":0.05161734864685886,"score_gpt":0.2642102603397325,"score_spread":0.21259291169287364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908086122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97214854,0.000028456083,0.022485599,0.0031062458,0.00014311097,0.0013087997,0.000011024037,0.00007199003,0.0006962486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9519753,0.00002162921,0.043777235,0.003331251,0.000091185684,0.00015887189,0.00011397713,0.0000075258195,0.0005230591],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987995,0.00007231274,0.00021782197,0.0005451802,0.00014348359,0.00022168366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995713,0.00004336779,0.000099577606,0.00014895378,0.00003346615,0.000103318795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048004175,0.00015367368,0.00013637429,0.00008935635,0.000503645,0.00005043461,0.00010225523,0.00008896558,0.000032916756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013854518,0.0001263031,0.000024237486,0.00031305454,0.00035485518,0.00013098278,0.00028691956,0.000046355817,0.000013380803],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018279352,0.00010872715,0.9900939,0.000039172777,0.00002382462,6.888321e-7,0.00076191657,0.000040040897,0.00063620124,0.0004116901,0.0044336435,0.0032674351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004818918,0.00019418992,0.9074842,0.000014179802,0.000023493165,0.0000020116854,0.00051073096,0.006586916,0.000079649944,0.00019015564,0.08426354,0.00016906652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012228102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041029958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08260969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059343383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038312915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5150491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912285194","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.013","title":"Why we must question the militarisation of conservation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":361,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; Economic and Social Research Council; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; University of Sheffield; UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Poaching; Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Wildlife conservation; Politics; Political science; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Geography; Criminology; Ecology; Law; Economics; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.11252663087559228,"score_gpt":0.3086534341648529,"score_spread":0.19612680328926063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912285194","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010943982,0.9727238,0.00090865424,0.010073555,0.0008615804,0.0031407594,0.000062793246,0.00013966596,0.0011452321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00056427176,0.99319774,0.00033863634,0.0044163927,0.00009609374,0.00024430032,0.00073313824,0.00002127209,0.0003881609],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968897,0.0011002014,0.0009565427,0.00053093524,0.0002739231,0.00024867585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971598,0.0012874935,0.0009492516,0.0004975352,0.00006285812,0.00004309413],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001196104,0.00035559697,0.00082004844,0.000067890476,0.00019316925,0.000022085835,0.00043822793,0.0008043657,0.00094481854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071343256,0.00022029843,0.00028644578,0.0005914518,0.00048259617,0.00023816418,0.00017267521,0.00037753826,0.0005436916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009323262,0.00026564195,0.15019915,0.0028584558,0.00016058235,0.0000024813257,0.0001891577,0.00004260569,0.000043354714,0.00704101,0.13165572,0.7074486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013107006,0.00014436129,0.04674202,0.0007014418,0.00021277423,0.0000070323345,0.000024130304,0.00026367523,0.0000017090534,0.0009800717,0.9505409,0.0002508067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095743884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003469705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8188852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023600816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009720332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912641801","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.011","title":"Chasing the light: Positive bias in camera-based surveys of groundfish examined as risk-foraging trade-offs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Tula Foundation; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation","keywords":"Foraging; Groundfish; Ecology; Geography; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.0421467027460893,"score_gpt":0.24181382725496295,"score_spread":0.19966712450887364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912641801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98876405,0.0000108392005,0.00023435205,0.0058304057,0.00007687255,0.00038496283,0.0000041478866,0.00002072047,0.00467366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997414,0.000014114015,0.000081347025,0.0023604021,0.000007537945,0.000019191439,0.000019464129,0.0000031038433,0.00008086841],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870163,0.00061476056,0.00020525455,0.00021931711,0.00009536826,0.00016364778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991677,0.0005336533,0.00016001852,0.00011802824,0.000006098356,0.000014540694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013546603,0.000095611016,0.00015181644,0.000027477896,0.00011812024,0.000009372456,0.00013425924,0.0000770323,0.00030171045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003175023,0.000060656632,0.000034216828,0.00023713628,0.00018529347,0.00009014875,0.00008869389,0.00010959906,0.00006299804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031972922,0.000052473704,0.99762136,0.000003343593,0.000009373851,0.0000015795342,0.00020202516,0.00006273716,0.00066130917,0.00020943226,0.0003250257,0.0008193402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031121608,0.00019087562,0.9967758,0.000010484948,0.0000068102677,3.459281e-7,0.00028575107,0.00094570563,0.00039204952,0.00047470402,0.0005229588,0.00008330743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011227522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013890977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008649931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061945975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000056885538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33035177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917282631","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.02.026","title":"Synthesizing expert opinion to assess the at-sea risks to seabirds in the western North Atlantic","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Birds Canada; Mount Allison University","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Mount Allison University; Bird Studies Canada","keywords":"Bycatch; Fishery; Environmental science; Seabird; Endangered species; Analytic hierarchy process; Marine conservation; Marine debris; Stakeholder; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Debris; Operations research; Habitat; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Engineering; Predation","score_opus":0.1576848386678766,"score_gpt":0.3314500327654894,"score_spread":0.1737651940976128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917282631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911251,0.000006623443,0.00009120082,0.007832982,0.00011552598,0.0005907361,0.0000024300714,0.000020674399,0.00021472234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98858756,0.000008965066,0.00011250254,0.011054546,0.000029251094,0.00009654129,0.000012533147,0.0000035069593,0.000094618175],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990386,0.00025708514,0.00014708185,0.00023930088,0.00012126417,0.00019671566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993518,0.00035749367,0.000040177314,0.00020726795,0.000005508408,0.000037770573],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045034385,0.00008937854,0.00009597993,0.000013165302,0.00013049849,0.000019778689,0.00032909977,0.00008766855,0.0003653127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011856961,0.000043811426,0.00002610053,0.00019674857,0.00006396155,0.00006240675,0.00018334002,0.00010337379,0.0016625257],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029999494,0.000033074524,0.9957175,6.579586e-7,9.4227636e-7,0.000001641045,0.00027142715,0.00003832291,0.002103691,0.00000930644,0.00081513135,0.0009782836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006700651,0.00012418104,0.98201495,0.0000061408014,0.0000013142625,0.0000034516581,0.00009568313,0.00003168193,0.0001113456,0.000009671792,0.017452965,0.00008159736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044846302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026259816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016637832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009441231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005244081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922247702","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.03.017","title":"Beyond protected areas: Private lands and public policy anchor intact pathways for multi-species wildlife migration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Conservation Association","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management; Ministry of Environment - Saskatchewan; World Wildlife Fund; Parks Canada; Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks","keywords":"Geography; Wildlife; Habitat; Ecology; Wildlife conservation; Habitat conservation; Agroforestry; Biology","score_opus":0.05850199901393208,"score_gpt":0.24895364054536986,"score_spread":0.1904516415314378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922247702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990412,0.000018247863,0.0021548783,0.00578704,0.00004733554,0.0010172322,0.00002565889,0.00007047034,0.00046713874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939997,0.000063732325,0.0023927793,0.0028497921,0.00007532427,0.00014895423,0.00016392667,0.00000606671,0.00029969565],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917805,0.000053585158,0.00017381457,0.00028719864,0.000103947634,0.00020342928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965256,0.00005584338,0.00008906642,0.00012362482,0.000014931315,0.000063947475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020498504,0.000118967284,0.00012664315,0.00003991267,0.000111113026,0.00006728783,0.000100545534,0.00009431536,0.00012331114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021705724,0.0000808612,0.000034581913,0.00017604712,0.00007640081,0.00018976862,0.00009158866,0.00005505572,0.000048603084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040911204,0.0000596365,0.9748887,0.000011926553,0.0000071945055,2.8413805e-7,0.000051553212,0.000004373974,0.016206248,0.0034784144,0.001366454,0.003884332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058625446,0.00021856741,0.92859185,0.000007436967,0.0000031354089,7.0162724e-7,0.000044020948,0.003260732,0.00017416003,0.0010476825,0.0659359,0.00012953089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016272774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017560422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06456945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006015828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008623839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3297424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2925086066","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.03.021","title":"Reciprocity in restoration ecology: When might large carnivore reintroduction restore ecosystems?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mesopredator release hypothesis; Carnivore; Apex predator; Predation; Trophic cascade; Ecology; Predator; Biology; Trophic level; Herbivore; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Ecosystem","score_opus":0.01915177669694073,"score_gpt":0.22124132433036584,"score_spread":0.2020895476334251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2925086066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893985,0.000019646995,0.000096287644,0.0075384704,0.000574491,0.0006557938,0.000006173229,0.00008725004,0.0016234188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995983,0.000012497053,0.0004600384,0.001985918,0.00014017403,0.000085598454,0.00020558642,0.000007808502,0.0011193798],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813074,0.00048106685,0.00040213714,0.0005306869,0.00015351216,0.00030185707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992775,0.00015532826,0.00020833884,0.00027662466,0.000033488726,0.000048720904],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010995609,0.00015284187,0.0002175351,0.000062139625,0.00014214734,0.000018292789,0.000168212,0.00040947806,0.002329401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003517306,0.00013193136,0.000044773195,0.00029278354,0.00008532383,0.0004035799,0.00009079872,0.00024738596,0.0013146757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118703225,0.00007257718,0.983157,0.000006387035,0.0000039264887,0.0000026429993,0.00012621752,0.000067378794,0.003138073,0.0011004369,0.011982316,0.00022438103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004964118,0.00019527711,0.94346434,0.000010140779,0.0000041728044,0.0000045545717,0.00007723316,0.0017827256,0.00008299572,0.0021275159,0.051594563,0.00016008654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005317792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064248773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039692637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041754436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029603196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937117517","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.03.028","title":"Top 100 research questions for biodiversity conservation in Southeast Asia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Mundipharma Pte Ltd; Directorate for Biological Sciences; National University of Singapore","keywords":"Biodiversity; Threatened species; Sustainability; Environmental planning; Wildlife; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecosystem services; Habitat destruction; Ecosystem; Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.10729587113232034,"score_gpt":0.29713419942137287,"score_spread":0.18983832828905253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937117517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98197645,0.000016215561,0.00041932895,0.010991006,0.00011911563,0.0011504597,0.000038811922,0.00006146207,0.0052271443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970535,0.000020354166,0.00063852395,0.00085114833,0.000025346606,0.000045631772,0.00016255402,0.0000035147511,0.0011994096],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837685,0.0003157149,0.00024203998,0.00045271954,0.00028064311,0.00033203795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915326,0.00038254706,0.000082065526,0.00023516233,0.00007913715,0.00006781079],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015410343,0.00012534084,0.0001522051,0.0001320093,0.0003950608,0.00004909118,0.00026698294,0.00017241827,0.0010907312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034888647,0.0001088851,0.00006466348,0.0006161899,0.00026526934,0.0001643327,0.00027292274,0.00018742967,0.0011134339],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107177126,0.00010066776,0.99139553,0.000011510537,0.0000054000625,0.0000011033584,0.00015348046,0.00006631535,0.0019594603,0.001019606,0.004465615,0.0007141246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005687113,0.00016134421,0.8924046,0.0000120101995,0.0000051582438,5.3642214e-7,0.0015578988,0.0013511309,0.0000776281,0.001093764,0.10262628,0.00014092801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030210305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084857515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098990925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024680863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024801942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947404325","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.029","title":"Conserving Panamanian harlequin frogs by integrating captive-breeding and research programs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Environmental Biology; First Quantum Minerals; Mohammed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund; Smithsonian Institution; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; IUCN Red List; Captive breeding; Conservation status; Endangered species; Zoology; Ecology; Fishery; Habitat","score_opus":0.07799064774433664,"score_gpt":0.29521307663450214,"score_spread":0.2172224288901655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947404325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99274796,0.0000917205,0.00009484548,0.0013855769,0.00007043008,0.00042321102,0.0000037549755,0.0000612297,0.0051212455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973494,0.000032859898,0.0011224123,0.0005779607,0.00003002749,0.000026559966,0.000044353088,0.0000066241532,0.0008098025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859375,0.00025962075,0.0002059551,0.00043337635,0.0001615889,0.00034572338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994405,0.00024002139,0.000071513816,0.00013154466,0.000026723124,0.00008968642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009245411,0.000119665325,0.00015426993,0.0000261171,0.000190704,0.000056773028,0.00016733698,0.00020321921,0.00084587693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021901111,0.00008180864,0.000027978886,0.00020415075,0.0005521025,0.00012614825,0.0002847514,0.0002490676,0.00034946154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020426536,0.00002305486,0.7925369,0.0000038364747,0.0000037699026,0.0000013496788,0.00014765172,2.1140201e-7,0.19427459,0.00051099726,0.0014621526,0.011015067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000805317,0.0018445035,0.8952149,0.00009630596,0.000006679168,0.000025133444,0.0035279086,0.00302151,0.0026940757,0.002020348,0.09021295,0.00053033716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008280132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018431523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19158052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009280729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009902527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92617595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950774616","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.003","title":"Assessing the vulnerability of Africa's freshwater fishes to climate change: A continent-wide trait-based analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Geography; Climate change; Endangered species; Freshwater ecosystem; Ecology; IUCN Red List; Biodiversity; Environmental change; Freshwater fish; Habitat; Fishery; Biology; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.10433942968833598,"score_gpt":0.30574947389152,"score_spread":0.20141004420318404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950774616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894888,0.000008626086,0.0002818174,0.0076372884,0.000045804274,0.0003399728,0.00013387536,0.000032535623,0.0020313037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99705076,0.0000029852997,0.00016452116,0.0025314721,0.000009303678,0.000058884525,0.00015312605,0.0000027055596,0.000026233078],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894947,0.0001690546,0.00024080275,0.00025410092,0.00017400012,0.00021259737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931544,0.00026832538,0.00011215895,0.0002255115,0.00002877094,0.000049815204],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005981933,0.00009916095,0.00019042968,0.000025771344,0.00008883342,0.000047772766,0.00017600767,0.00007323684,0.023243707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021572241,0.000057028832,0.00011588912,0.00058220123,0.00013693736,0.00011838608,0.00009382557,0.00006141393,0.000180132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027012029,0.0000617679,0.980956,0.0000048751617,0.000012005559,2.472471e-7,0.000090458285,0.00003235536,0.017476982,0.00016122866,0.0007669624,0.00041007833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014172088,0.000068106296,0.9805413,0.0000040887962,0.000030461279,9.4958004e-8,0.00038406742,0.0012748155,0.0013292371,0.00003485656,0.016105657,0.00008559834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000433488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007538975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023063576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009940861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032416156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97764915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953772174","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.010","title":"Sensitivity of biodiversity indices to life history stage, habitat type and landscape in Odonata community","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Odonata; Biodiversity; Ecology; Habitat; River ecosystem; Species richness; Wetland; Dragonfly; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.05566008979841956,"score_gpt":0.21018346931899723,"score_spread":0.15452337952057765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953772174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99870706,0.000016557307,0.0000045272122,0.00046740862,0.00006839817,0.00012240402,0.000023007884,0.000011072574,0.00057956926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733835,0.000009051727,0.00010377669,0.0024339356,0.0000015448377,4.3203934e-7,0.000035117075,7.344454e-7,0.00007702382],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934226,0.00030157188,0.00008276557,0.00012311286,0.00005359047,0.000096689335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996387,0.00016270581,0.000044881304,0.00009349127,0.000011965331,0.000048251724],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005096686,0.00005386438,0.000116673604,0.000031156927,0.00004525386,0.000003083725,0.00008325096,0.000082800645,0.0012101103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001865119,0.000046954723,0.000010142367,0.00011360301,0.00015523734,0.0001016044,0.0003081279,0.00010319353,0.00028372652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108031345,0.000044542023,0.98574585,0.000008015925,0.000002512522,0.000002116609,0.0003189229,0.00003390927,0.008794092,0.0000258648,0.004856341,0.0000597941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020152864,0.00021874518,0.9938553,0.000002462442,0.0000016770792,4.2855442e-7,0.0002926243,0.00036750417,0.00018558554,0.000026307185,0.004785615,0.00006220592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077858497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011738649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008608506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007182015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009909511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955288754","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.017","title":"Factors affecting feelings of justice in biodiversity conflicts: Toward fairer jaguar management in Calakmul, Mexico","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Mitacs; Université de Sherbrooke","keywords":"Injustice; Feeling; Economic Justice; Perception; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Environmental resource management; Psychology; Geography; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05555421959256631,"score_gpt":0.2474822011168061,"score_spread":0.1919279815242398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955288754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99726784,0.000008583107,0.000059800474,0.0009392588,0.00013227852,0.0004028954,0.0000040356404,0.000024146711,0.0011611839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982835,0.0000152335,0.00021894649,0.0013934476,0.0000041038707,0.0000061379947,0.000027557566,0.0000019972713,0.000049041908],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990042,0.00013748958,0.0002684764,0.0002883735,0.00011288998,0.00018861289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994923,0.00023271625,0.00012655808,0.00010979378,0.000010424773,0.000028249111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004657498,0.00011136139,0.00017942775,0.00006321932,0.00004125443,0.0000061257524,0.000147445,0.00016983977,0.00046828162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014850736,0.00009233062,0.000035221517,0.00032204296,0.0001069601,0.00016545983,0.00013574373,0.00012999894,0.00013766339],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005057562,0.00007042991,0.9974318,0.000019161675,0.0000051570673,0.0000028002873,0.0004614171,0.00020924529,0.0011915267,0.00017009703,0.00016180932,0.00022595312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047754144,0.00008958554,0.99654615,0.000015310754,0.000008914534,2.414002e-7,0.0010187043,0.00058049144,0.00043598984,0.00013856469,0.0005774601,0.00011103645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011189758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000361116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001112142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013224788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000053463905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51273555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966163956","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108259","title":"Light pollution is a driver of insect declines","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Impact of Light on Environment and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":406,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Light pollution; Foraging; Predation; Insectivore; Insect; Habitat destruction; Biology; Ecological trap; Climate change; Geography","score_opus":0.04677197053299734,"score_gpt":0.25805649915951684,"score_spread":0.2112845286265195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966163956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917316,0.000022879562,0.00006713075,0.004063797,0.000069523165,0.000191494,0.0000033571805,0.000020269765,0.003829949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99575716,0.000046884834,0.00040715205,0.0033519738,0.000020425412,0.0000032447117,0.000008650294,0.0000030830686,0.00040143784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929357,0.000048367703,0.00019043492,0.00016490828,0.00013867159,0.00016407536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968064,0.00003172303,0.00010837518,0.00012487217,0.000004450838,0.000049965744],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021174726,0.00007663419,0.00011824036,0.000018079916,0.00003883788,0.0000042114707,0.000088834975,0.00010049479,0.00549164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033314864,0.000053392538,0.00004229566,0.00010970226,0.00005714881,0.000114618015,0.00005419479,0.000051192364,0.00090278016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029978482,0.0000386604,0.8267461,0.0000030335157,0.0000020358295,1.5847648e-7,0.000068819725,0.000002160487,0.1714568,0.0001867659,0.0009827348,0.00048276773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021308134,0.00023086237,0.9651372,0.000005428321,0.0000025635134,6.929771e-7,0.000013784446,0.00008880758,0.009139013,0.0004554946,0.024639659,0.000073403986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017390659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010474026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1623178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006595533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000070512324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966206234","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.002","title":"Human-carnivore relations: A systematic review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":179,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka; Alberta Conservation Association; Leuphana Universität Lüneburg; Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research; Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España; National Science Foundation; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Advanced Foods and Materials Canada","keywords":"Carnivore; Geography; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Damages; Predation; Political science; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.12585455726413386,"score_gpt":0.3306909016058362,"score_spread":0.20483634434170234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966206234","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000054722263,0.9927547,0.000025510079,0.0003484852,0.00014033742,0.003946869,0.00001407891,0.00011523491,0.002600039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000013105948,0.9906068,0.000091752554,0.0036481898,0.0000370235,0.0009530381,0.00054396037,0.00002033931,0.004085787],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968166,0.0009769782,0.0011618952,0.0005797867,0.0002092505,0.0002555322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978701,0.0005013945,0.0009751339,0.00056684687,0.000025761587,0.000060796734],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094753894,0.00038492138,0.001901855,0.000049462793,0.00020434841,0.000024076578,0.0004435282,0.00068848167,0.0029338794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010131982,0.00025738028,0.0004222732,0.00050732715,0.00015357738,0.00016092998,0.00018439862,0.000396403,0.011215221],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020075317,0.000096620155,0.008844996,0.9324866,0.00014440765,0.000008460497,0.000011285524,9.140231e-7,4.847176e-7,0.0018000773,0.0457078,0.010896339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008565229,0.00009640754,0.002780863,0.2719739,0.0016263553,0.000027268936,0.0000037082912,0.000011327595,1.0833093e-8,0.00028597596,0.72263545,0.0004730673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032418837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018942821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6769276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028893581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005785854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966401516","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.026","title":"Smartphone technologies supporting community-based environmental monitoring and implementation: a systematic scoping review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Documentation; Process (computing); Data collection; Scholarship; Citizen science; Computer science; Business; Data science; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.07958328390160851,"score_gpt":0.3252559943732309,"score_spread":0.24567271047162237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966401516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99626034,0.0012927243,0.00003096196,0.000856464,0.000047614267,0.0011136744,0.000014395185,0.00011988871,0.00026390806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997707,0.0011150248,0.00012293986,0.00074659387,0.0000035915596,0.00013080816,0.00015745698,0.000004009515,0.000012567341],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990304,0.0001760784,0.0003219429,0.00016542831,0.00013562938,0.00017053589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994376,0.00016191462,0.00018532563,0.0001824733,0.0000045690613,0.000028121734],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061234285,0.00010726834,0.00020798389,0.000014423284,0.00018236403,0.000026516569,0.000118547236,0.0000632758,0.004809378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000094120915,0.00008374438,0.00003285559,0.00011577284,0.00011311273,0.00010518713,0.00015726872,0.000110001245,0.00030046518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058605365,0.000038055725,0.96670014,0.008032293,0.000004906006,9.685862e-7,0.00004643723,6.0340665e-7,0.024325952,0.000060863524,0.0001331816,0.0006507634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009778579,0.00039799986,0.94424087,0.025976675,0.000049137638,0.000016792714,0.014497011,0.000082130675,0.012671153,0.000096926706,0.0004764404,0.0005169857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055290555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020021977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022459228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018050979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000048183915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99610037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972513999","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108239","title":"Conservation translocations and post-release monitoring: Identifying trends in failures, biases, and challenges from around the world","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":202,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; McGill University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Habitat; Chromosomal translocation; Habitat destruction; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.09147378956726233,"score_gpt":0.2739068676162943,"score_spread":0.18243307804903197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972513999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95302534,0.0008449188,0.000020664778,0.04543013,0.0001133678,0.00024494552,0.0000099997,0.00003738524,0.00027326736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99727064,0.00051739457,0.0002734007,0.0014740555,0.000044494067,0.000055006934,0.00009534665,0.0000058662167,0.00026378286],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988578,0.00021573916,0.0002625701,0.00037757112,0.00011327323,0.0001730226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890554,0.0007542968,0.00010189602,0.00017209559,0.000017755045,0.000048405356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036842766,0.00013824749,0.00014601294,0.00007560304,0.0001689749,0.00005015969,0.00011607461,0.00013734262,0.00032354685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014882481,0.000102519276,0.000024527952,0.00030697763,0.0002231123,0.0003398158,0.000065826986,0.00016597303,0.00004244676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005354853,0.00003661781,0.9842649,0.0000040688583,0.000007924219,0.0000012822683,0.0002527111,0.000019828904,0.0032590358,0.0011375165,0.00013534976,0.010827196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041217808,0.00006450781,0.9914225,0.000025978929,0.000011584806,0.0000022620754,0.0005495232,0.0014046166,0.00008131209,0.0012830866,0.0046100584,0.00013239287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031091569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008843146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044245336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052450952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010360603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4934683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972906205","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108242","title":"Scaling from individual physiological measures to population-level demographic change: Case studies and future directions for conservation management","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Wilfrid Laurier University; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Stressor; Environmental change; Population; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biodiversity; Environmental planning; Geography; Climate change; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.23393155380043715,"score_gpt":0.32369426938415086,"score_spread":0.08976271558371371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972906205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940297,0.00030441178,0.00014339303,0.0038242184,0.00026466354,0.0009969601,0.00028150567,0.00008077164,0.0000743704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99305344,0.0005244673,0.0014999141,0.0038536144,0.0001250629,0.0003528041,0.00055633055,0.0000058633705,0.000028516843],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989485,0.000081879654,0.00021956569,0.00040278988,0.00015224826,0.00019502583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994996,0.00017510288,0.00008620217,0.00012355809,0.000041354393,0.00007417016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002623903,0.00015055876,0.00018619173,0.00003965747,0.00027871784,0.000040164905,0.0000815829,0.00012809577,0.0008788804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001066233,0.00011298186,0.000052841024,0.000291451,0.00008704808,0.00013608416,0.00014081474,0.00006165186,0.000059604437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013776966,0.00009706677,0.95227396,0.000030061676,0.00009960469,0.000010558281,0.0005099683,0.0000052479736,0.0025160888,0.0043974244,0.004040576,0.035881665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034711504,0.00011145734,0.9702377,0.000011468015,0.000028999719,0.000009183016,0.0023739769,0.00009411102,0.000026349484,0.0009323756,0.02565913,0.00016818532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004952293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005106834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03571348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011223082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000014172862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96231234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990626691","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108271","title":"A review of successes, challenges, and lessons from Indigenous protected and conserved areas","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Victoria","keywords":"Indigenous; Corporate governance; Legislation; Commit; Indigenous rights; Environmental planning; Political science; Resource (disambiguation); Scale (ratio); Livelihood; Environmental resource management; Business; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.17342385755937162,"score_gpt":0.30232251055142273,"score_spread":0.1288986529920511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990626691","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006630795,0.9897543,0.00000549614,0.0009605898,0.000040946357,0.0020895523,0.00012614598,0.00003882416,0.00035334643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00009467623,0.99849993,0.00016383162,0.0006430153,0.000017696213,0.00007549481,0.00042460253,0.000009422986,0.00007133484],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809706,0.0004145012,0.0005130997,0.0006082152,0.00017621311,0.00019090349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865556,0.0003519525,0.00056081126,0.00031970325,0.000032918106,0.00007906046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004483072,0.00031291833,0.0010598885,0.000053162585,0.0001144288,0.00002156679,0.00025909647,0.00033181862,0.0003168072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024256855,0.00021956455,0.0001179824,0.0002128641,0.00033327076,0.00006393675,0.0005361611,0.00018133226,0.000043688164],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136741,0.00007950881,0.017065529,0.038514342,0.00011133462,0.0000046624264,0.00012106861,3.743373e-8,0.000005389205,0.00003934848,0.00035930474,0.9436858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016354611,0.000093333474,0.09125839,0.014847274,0.00033318618,0.000005154369,0.00003567834,0.0000032687792,4.0724453e-7,0.00008415324,0.89290804,0.00026757055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015551713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021075038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9434182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006249044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046196088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89535826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994673543","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108368","title":"Indirect effects of habitat loss via habitat fragmentation: A cross-taxa analysis of forest-dependent species","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":196,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fig Tree Foundation; Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz; Marshall-Smith Syndroom Research Foundation; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás; Conseil Français de l'Énergie; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais; Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia; Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Center for Stroke Research Berlin; Dermatology Foundation; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Sight Research UK; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; Natural Environment Research Council; National Instruments Corporation; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; American College of Dentists; Association of American Railroads; European Commission","keywords":"Species richness; Habitat; Ecology; Habitat fragmentation; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat destruction; Biodiversity; Extinction debt; Geography; Taxon; Biology","score_opus":0.01521105770654943,"score_gpt":0.25184223829975827,"score_spread":0.23663118059320884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994673543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967952,0.00005332217,0.001464654,0.00015265125,0.00011891286,0.0003149116,0.0000128595575,0.00001835562,0.001069154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99875605,0.00003472357,0.0005605894,0.0002363556,0.0000059130302,0.000027235961,0.0000629977,0.0000031553545,0.00031296597],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989728,0.00012002939,0.00034807168,0.0002449999,0.0001732755,0.00014085151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879783,0.0006795497,0.0003038295,0.00014622146,0.000045288707,0.000027284528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027200804,0.00011050061,0.00032808687,0.000081385675,0.00007096438,0.0000073736105,0.00012998638,0.000120243705,0.00052449456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023077684,0.00008528627,0.00012136199,0.00049809524,0.00040531324,0.000121228804,0.000102464495,0.00006484993,0.00006947724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050700306,0.00008574324,0.9815332,0.00002694224,0.00019718053,0.0000013911877,0.00015367822,0.0027007,0.014583902,0.000532108,0.00002598307,0.000108424785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033911158,0.00029130225,0.9923316,0.000006781782,0.00010252988,4.766546e-7,0.00004116308,0.0028021433,0.00292297,0.0010393801,0.000028811282,0.00009368902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007863635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016612398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011660933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006253321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006340742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5742848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015027376","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108571","title":"Impacts of the coronavirus pandemic on biodiversity conservation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":384,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Biodiversity; Wildlife; Sustainability; Public relations; Convention on Biological Diversity; Environmental ethics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Biology; Medicine","score_opus":0.11319223748168164,"score_gpt":0.33716536752715354,"score_spread":0.2239731300454719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015027376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66202414,0.00026818554,0.000020950129,0.024413038,0.3088736,0.0015082791,0.0017873076,0.00016307102,0.0009414373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6639948,0.0011867199,0.00011970117,0.039728235,0.2869276,0.000037932274,0.00771515,0.000031010422,0.00025886702],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819165,0.0002420907,0.0004469864,0.00035808358,0.0005445528,0.00021663556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975166,0.0010588018,0.00048389324,0.00032851193,0.00040261433,0.00020961241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004026584,0.00022419644,0.0005062455,0.000044593773,0.00010506956,0.0000162266,0.00020732866,0.00083617115,0.00018573325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063404776,0.00013143534,0.00021651194,0.00026295907,0.00020004314,0.000038620372,0.00009051743,0.00062661874,0.000051591298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082743407,0.00010480249,0.17997782,0.00018350492,0.000045242083,0.000003624147,0.00002283528,2.0166445e-7,0.0001586854,0.00015866036,0.81739557,0.001121625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008126107,0.0007174828,0.3221801,0.00016707646,0.00008545876,8.653081e-7,0.000025988056,0.000020528949,0.000015927528,0.00010061244,0.6757685,0.00010489233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001248848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000068700145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14220226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017960307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001345122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7590602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033060249","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108665","title":"COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdown as a “Global Human Confinement Experiment” to investigate biodiversity conservation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":267,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Biodiversity; Pandemic; Wildlife; Environmental resource management; Convention on Biological Diversity; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Strengths and weaknesses; Environmental planning; Diversity (politics); Wildlife trade; Population; Business; Geography; Ecology; Political science; Environmental science; Biology; Sociology","score_opus":0.31387206629277786,"score_gpt":0.4332515203622993,"score_spread":0.11937945406952144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033060249","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05525069,0.88824373,0.00012481476,0.047379483,0.00023364295,0.0059029115,0.0012524714,0.000578066,0.0010341721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033388922,0.8771369,0.00020860677,0.11174505,0.00014427179,0.00022229293,0.007040084,0.000015918486,0.00014797806],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974156,0.00049656717,0.0007487917,0.00071001257,0.0002811681,0.00034787733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972,0.00022407177,0.00044168797,0.00022787125,0.00015742164,0.0017489624],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058947457,0.00041033133,0.0013787674,0.00008815046,0.00025389812,0.000064403415,0.00014808048,0.0005418111,0.00067837175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042965254,0.00031110336,0.00020515922,0.0005281483,0.00020050936,0.000044985158,0.00017766225,0.00026492096,0.000116779804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072546594,0.0011226587,0.28639102,0.020397054,0.0016153611,0.0004092799,0.0006050653,5.5688395e-7,0.00009192235,0.014272784,0.22304739,0.45132145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097009644,0.0008921232,0.00641318,0.00094253226,0.0004217725,0.000032831773,0.00010042085,0.000012342165,2.131736e-7,0.00020118747,0.9896994,0.00031387046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019771042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008617429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76665205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010057415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024648723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038412545","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108654","title":"Genetic diversity targets and indicators in the CBD post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework must be improved","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":596,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet; Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; European Cooperation in Science and Technology; European Commission","keywords":"Convention on Biological Diversity; Biodiversity; Genetic diversity; Conservation genetics; Agricultural biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Population; Diversity (politics); Measurement of biodiversity; Global biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Environmental planning; Geography; Biodiversity conservation; Political science; Genetics; Economics","score_opus":0.053570431649487674,"score_gpt":0.23458924704659287,"score_spread":0.18101881539710518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038412545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94154114,0.00009028284,0.00002090342,0.057736985,0.000023590459,0.00034192883,0.00016801502,0.000038965,0.000038198534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855274,0.00007174977,0.00041909996,0.013843408,0.000056725825,0.00000516414,0.00007538378,2.3270763e-7,8.5205545e-7],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987042,0.00027744716,0.00015475474,0.00038342486,0.0002135499,0.00026665052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937505,0.00031036665,0.000053738706,0.000052231815,0.00005774856,0.00015088332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023291826,0.00012679503,0.00013845602,0.000008889585,0.000346299,0.000063521526,0.00045241337,0.00023447828,0.000244562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066683255,0.00004654724,0.00004549387,0.00077061437,0.00022240798,0.000047307924,0.0006146637,0.0002277866,0.000029101237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086132546,0.00004691714,0.9642662,0.0000035654095,0.00000559003,0.00001241877,0.0002107082,3.540078e-7,0.029439088,0.00016262692,0.00036175156,0.005404686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012205438,0.00049227336,0.9964095,0.0000016552693,0.0000053469794,0.0000020046896,0.0005610547,0.0000493987,0.00013323515,0.0005274219,0.0015815247,0.00011458362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006466766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002554743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043986253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026626965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011888166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26777822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080497588","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108732","title":"High conservation priority of range-edge plant populations not matched by habitat protection or research effort","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Endangered species; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; National park; Geography; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Taxon; Population; Conservation status; Threatened species; Biology; Demography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.3255004920044747,"score_gpt":0.3429390359988002,"score_spread":0.01743854399432554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080497588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97982085,0.000011349941,0.00072021363,0.017867602,0.00008014054,0.0007632665,0.0003396365,0.000087951055,0.00030897505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697787,0.00003032756,0.0003014202,0.001615573,0.000032729396,0.00010497319,0.00085332425,0.00000638225,0.00007742858],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984923,0.000199684,0.00037427925,0.00032827014,0.00037045582,0.0002349809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994032,0.00011710176,0.00015279674,0.00013999252,0.00008069885,0.00010622206],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005705624,0.00012135401,0.00019805212,0.0000237699,0.00021687188,0.00002808776,0.00015851899,0.00018331343,0.0065685846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007112251,0.000090381094,0.00004785496,0.0005860612,0.00029735747,0.000159527,0.00011608711,0.0001842133,0.00027157218],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009970836,0.00018554414,0.667162,0.000039594994,0.00000774285,0.0000023985049,0.00018205683,0.000006114159,0.28129005,0.0038773573,0.04568934,0.0005607174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005618776,0.00043733878,0.9684,0.000009175669,0.000006565485,0.0000020173027,0.00032113472,0.0007323012,0.012251423,0.00028733083,0.016851582,0.00013926477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002034506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006837964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30123797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025263603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001957953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090202716","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108797","title":"Designing wildlife-vehicle conflict observation systems to inform ecology and transportation studies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Red Deer College","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Agency (philosophy); Data collection; Harm; Environmental resource management; Baseline (sea); Wildlife conservation; Transport engineering; Environmental planning; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Psychology; Engineering; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.12785305645000883,"score_gpt":0.290333746143175,"score_spread":0.16248068969316615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090202716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97708154,0.000055907414,0.002679878,0.019278342,0.0001252622,0.00051760254,0.0000102534905,0.00011028965,0.00014093885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97625214,0.00007172257,0.0020929333,0.021241706,0.000060533494,0.00011886525,0.00007192393,0.000007607542,0.00008254026],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882656,0.00008932491,0.0004070329,0.00033810493,0.00015197729,0.00018701424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935013,0.00021011497,0.00015087497,0.00009146209,0.00006738824,0.00013005013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024293829,0.0001510324,0.0002073535,0.0000281087,0.00023426543,0.000050343766,0.00009654291,0.000118242715,0.00010145858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004075766,0.00012659465,0.000031032112,0.00039453252,0.000104951556,0.0004435169,0.000037205526,0.00010284389,0.00014744485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001203257,0.000024116895,0.94185114,0.000019033156,0.000025494237,0.0000024552942,0.0013709794,0.0011784878,0.043191276,0.0010572637,0.0091339005,0.0020255127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029629777,0.0004267446,0.92279774,0.000016926615,0.000015435251,0.0000019953125,0.00097646046,0.0072688614,0.00047459177,0.000076344775,0.06746122,0.00018739428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002930446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000112933776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058327325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008894842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011844946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.516238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092532218","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108764","title":"On the conservation value of historic canals for aquatic ecosystems","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Recreation; Environmental planning; Ecosystem services; Habitat; Cultural heritage; Ecosystem; Geography; Business; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.07494716374772924,"score_gpt":0.2370913080082167,"score_spread":0.16214414426048745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092532218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93021864,0.0000151934955,0.0026658603,0.06370351,0.00010238741,0.0006811548,0.000008379942,0.00002938918,0.0025754964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97584206,0.0000101342175,0.00018983356,0.023699798,0.00001988949,0.000104495586,0.000016274302,0.000002566583,0.00011496657],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938416,0.000092324415,0.00019165486,0.0001570157,0.000078310346,0.000096548356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991124,0.0006448759,0.00013492758,0.00007727449,0.0000096246995,0.00002087085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003123298,0.000068068126,0.000119096134,0.000007696929,0.00012785627,0.0000039084966,0.00011794843,0.00005133712,0.00029975254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010083395,0.000041411062,0.00003563115,0.00012773713,0.00010368547,0.00003677763,0.000047629754,0.00003813849,0.000046609082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012900207,0.000057017176,0.35815036,0.000027931668,0.000037698188,4.958654e-7,0.0001909397,0.00019504126,0.0019000928,0.1036339,0.5354837,0.00019381537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061117666,0.001226202,0.7655989,0.000015752164,0.000044648004,3.0174468e-7,0.00020776916,0.04492382,0.00076144945,0.016966011,0.16942528,0.0002187307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003486111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006881411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4074485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005715152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005726372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.328208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096183084","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108826","title":"Integrating season-specific needs of migratory and resident birds in conservation planning","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Bird conservation; Ecology; Geography; Population; Nearctic ecozone; Conservation biology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.10928398491655597,"score_gpt":0.26911568715136286,"score_spread":0.1598317022348069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096183084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942385,0.00018285624,0.00040040046,0.0034907693,0.000025115809,0.00012878868,0.000013246544,0.000033590804,0.0014867526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99787444,0.00007870689,0.00021406308,0.0017497727,0.000012692834,0.0000103428965,0.00004851134,0.000003102227,0.00000834784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993228,0.00007715739,0.00023625058,0.00014417106,0.00010653483,0.0001130995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999672,0.00010205632,0.000097947704,0.000056731988,0.000015125931,0.000056134435],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019744642,0.00008179837,0.00012298141,0.000023103783,0.00004424066,0.000016510654,0.00007233866,0.00008143305,0.0021291391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018846279,0.00006703167,0.00002096014,0.00037164942,0.00012763913,0.00009791407,0.000072854054,0.00008515524,0.000028707667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004792448,0.0000107891765,0.9285441,0.000006378575,0.0000012789939,0.000001443849,0.00068351906,0.0000038764356,0.063420944,0.0024224154,0.004338732,0.00051859656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024013343,0.00010027948,0.9803834,0.000017669732,0.0000014352592,8.537857e-7,0.005507249,0.00053831225,0.0022866863,0.00007876675,0.010760158,0.00008504472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002707431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015356671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06113426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009167631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000058361443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99878305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3100472575","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108850","title":"Avian community response to landscape-scale habitat reclamation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Bureau of Land Management; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Land reclamation; Habitat; Species richness; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Geography; Environmental science; Wildlife; Revegetation; Vegetation (pathology); Landscape ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.057551100271794824,"score_gpt":0.24527753405177696,"score_spread":0.18772643377998213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3100472575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9526774,0.0000032668377,0.0015683434,0.04198212,0.000030598945,0.00021675344,0.0000059381796,0.000079129466,0.003436426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789153,0.0000033370065,0.0011155007,0.019738492,0.000029116849,0.000020212445,0.000036064837,0.0000033812137,0.00013864925],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990753,0.00040761748,0.00013926897,0.00015055836,0.00010777036,0.00011947498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995936,0.00012705699,0.000036502723,0.00012855066,0.00000650546,0.00010777481],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005091153,0.000075579024,0.00008585298,0.000011533888,0.00016837048,0.000025083196,0.00015762096,0.000053679134,0.00050345267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030471748,0.000056077348,0.000027641388,0.00021147226,0.00004314261,0.00007662511,0.0001532376,0.00010210753,0.0009977733],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055291736,0.000053127795,0.9272927,0.000004295957,0.000003168379,0.0000017201703,0.0007177594,0.00014840576,0.02735439,0.00003796119,0.039260995,0.004572535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018546906,0.00030218894,0.92032385,0.0000039662013,0.0000024383376,3.3316863e-7,0.000186812,0.000728752,0.0002173813,0.00016669776,0.0777923,0.000089806104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009064647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000090458816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038531307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030649644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002419057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109417050","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108871","title":"Long-term effectiveness of Natura 2000 network to protect biodiversity: A hint of optimism for common birds","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage","funders":"","keywords":"Natura 2000; Biodiversity; Geography; Habitat; Bird conservation; Ecology; Conservation biology; Population decline; Land management; Habitat destruction; Common species; Environmental resource management; Land use; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.03901468404880723,"score_gpt":0.25863839065967503,"score_spread":0.2196237066108678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109417050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914877,0.000034499128,0.006056088,0.0014831814,0.000042573498,0.0007765483,0.000020957608,0.000019636089,0.00007884346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99573106,0.000009592921,0.003040754,0.0011309555,0.000008849464,0.000047599893,0.00002556448,0.000001608368,0.000004037442],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994106,0.00011848213,0.00015043111,0.00016485319,0.000053914806,0.00010169819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994536,0.0003246899,0.00009890079,0.000054715292,0.000034633544,0.00003347009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002819193,0.00006884719,0.00018204622,0.000008363884,0.000078157005,0.0000024146686,0.0001024414,0.00009080613,0.000045918747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023159511,0.00005326782,0.000046437883,0.00017379201,0.00014055347,0.000034762787,0.00011908101,0.000051088373,0.000013075792],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047140656,0.000036672485,0.98526233,0.000052167223,0.000021058291,5.755385e-7,0.00009593951,0.0017529321,0.0112102255,0.00030937174,0.00019321145,0.00059411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028122062,0.00067241606,0.9954834,0.000016141947,0.00001023539,2.4946274e-7,0.0000086885,0.0011339174,0.0016663327,0.00058173406,0.0000777133,0.000067976136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000388505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043262862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010221045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003824649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000067081537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21721986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114092777","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108923","title":"A hippo in the room: Predicting the persistence and dispersion of an invasive mega-vertebrate in Colombia, South America","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fondation Rideau Hall; Queen Elizabeth Scholars; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fondations communautaires du Canada; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Population; Ecology; Geography; Population growth; Habitat; Population viability analysis; Climate change; Invasive species; Endangered species; Biology","score_opus":0.04746030794473014,"score_gpt":0.2173962449192939,"score_spread":0.16993593697456377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114092777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859456,0.000020514877,0.000020088526,0.01351224,0.000013855717,0.00028553768,0.0000035757355,0.000009573362,0.00018905014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905178,0.000020032485,0.000109197004,0.009298112,0.0000098692,0.000026596068,0.000012839137,0.0000017488633,0.0000037976088],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989915,0.00040092485,0.00019007265,0.0002094712,0.00009281842,0.00011521046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940413,0.00036541148,0.00010840383,0.000087695604,0.0000074216764,0.000026927099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000394067,0.00007023147,0.00010297541,0.000011026793,0.00009790711,0.000011730555,0.00019016105,0.00007656217,0.00007625677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006001279,0.000039920913,0.000018201896,0.00032214922,0.00028331857,0.00014953948,0.00008166795,0.00013722798,0.00000763751],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006609805,0.000030165422,0.9921032,0.0000029138344,0.0000015610511,0.0000022826991,0.004427216,0.000056386176,0.0021733954,0.000027666185,0.00011055266,0.0009985216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021258248,0.00031065315,0.9798664,0.0000070604688,0.0000043029913,0.0000014630912,0.0055547804,0.013660467,0.0000712879,0.0001487069,0.00010987601,0.000052435276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041778246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000817448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013604081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002407141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001393287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16279276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122264597","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108968","title":"COVID19-induced reduction in human disturbance enhances fattening of an overabundant goose species","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Université Laval","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; ArcticNet; Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada; Canada First Research Excellence Fund; Eastern Bird Banding Association","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Goose; Foraging; Waterfowl; Ecology; Habitat; Wildlife; Population; Trophic level; Anatidae; Geography; Ecosystem; Predation; Fishery; Biology; Environmental science; Demography","score_opus":0.06198314489929072,"score_gpt":0.28746397573624405,"score_spread":0.22548083083695333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122264597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990101,0.000014612796,0.000051461924,0.00029456435,0.00008828774,0.000091255555,0.0000031622208,0.000017807222,0.00042874878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99904686,0.00000874701,0.00045107488,0.00014229615,0.000023392202,0.000012677179,0.00004803718,0.0000022582292,0.00026465103],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992124,0.00013506798,0.00021189972,0.00024249886,0.00007661263,0.00012152952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997187,0.00003597451,0.000097962635,0.000108777975,0.000012320471,0.00002622958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016844828,0.000071124654,0.00012509122,0.000013053001,0.00008944554,0.000008201372,0.00008124415,0.0001050468,0.00086232985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008348199,0.000058726193,0.000025018682,0.0001675921,0.00018899373,0.00017177947,0.000051918545,0.00009311824,0.000014478378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011197244,0.000081306964,0.4759126,0.0000010803483,7.0477194e-7,0.000004882634,0.000047866808,0.0000050692993,0.523271,0.00009879008,0.00001780738,0.00054763973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012955842,0.0001248213,0.8145921,0.0000067249343,0.0000025572615,0.0000044927933,0.00014689106,0.000015496596,0.18437803,0.000338629,0.00019440198,0.00006625208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008472987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041369375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33889303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070110655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009830313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94419074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126874272","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108980","title":"Knowledge production for target-based biodiversity governance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Convention on Biological Diversity; Accountability; Corporate governance; Sustainability; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Vision; Environmental planning; Action (physics); Political science; Business; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05298868937214538,"score_gpt":0.2312576587819764,"score_spread":0.17826896940983103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126874272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98410577,0.00009367434,0.0027812049,0.010582942,0.00029440408,0.00036527775,0.000039640236,0.000080604324,0.0016564929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862354,0.000043775482,0.007168956,0.0033569105,0.00008750974,0.0000338301,0.00033437772,0.0000037497553,0.0027355377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991409,0.00007638591,0.00012937354,0.00037701734,0.0001143648,0.00016195637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957824,0.00007233366,0.00008377582,0.0001598059,0.000060986862,0.000044874796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023732104,0.000098995115,0.00009954508,0.000011976703,0.00033221935,0.000023648145,0.00012343215,0.00008396407,0.00085610774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003051729,0.00008562899,0.00007413241,0.00026132984,0.00014740757,0.000084703424,0.00014011556,0.000047755184,0.0002484314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052654035,0.0001537769,0.9698079,0.000014372272,0.000007957086,0.0000017992552,0.000049685837,0.00011768429,0.004665969,0.00007597544,0.02292966,0.002122517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024768632,0.000043509892,0.6818724,0.0000039848233,0.000007732934,4.2377184e-7,0.000051665113,0.00065950176,0.0032028132,0.00016541149,0.31364143,0.00010343943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009986195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001420087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29071176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014447414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022796712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9373779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127899071","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108973","title":"Using the 2020 global pandemic as a springboard to highlight the need for amphibian conservation in eastern Asia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum","funders":"","keywords":"Amphibian; Pandemic; Geography; Conservation science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Environmental planning; Political science; Environmental resource management; Biology; Agroforestry; Ecology; Biodiversity; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Medicine; Environmental science","score_opus":0.29149291317669274,"score_gpt":0.4463380702345563,"score_spread":0.15484515705786356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127899071","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027986359,0.91410464,0.001266089,0.04809223,0.0006009216,0.0071674,0.00015808939,0.000101610596,0.000522644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058894637,0.9532568,0.0012853772,0.035801694,0.0012163352,0.00085147354,0.0013520014,0.000046402514,0.00030049297],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974537,0.0005686546,0.0008498997,0.000505744,0.00023061039,0.00039139792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980168,0.00077745493,0.00034039226,0.00043712012,0.00022555735,0.00020269575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011033072,0.0003258654,0.0010870437,0.00005157048,0.00015225662,0.00009310368,0.0002562904,0.0004225862,0.00008057752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021010686,0.00016028334,0.000375333,0.0008514629,0.000088830406,0.00004573712,0.00011074871,0.00028647765,0.000024968485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039901875,0.0002697413,0.07071553,0.0050865402,0.00028663554,0.00004973377,0.00009835435,0.0000040177424,0.000010328415,0.021610329,0.009204526,0.89226526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047287878,0.0001994099,0.010739155,0.0036346016,0.00031329368,0.000068124886,0.00016656819,0.00036777055,1.238646e-7,0.00024586453,0.98359513,0.0001970468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076949754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002662642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9743906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039935426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016172267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6536165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127926664","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108995","title":"The power of national acoustic tracking networks to assess the impacts of human activity on marine organisms during the COVID-19 pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"South Australian Research and Development Institute; University of Tasmania; Flinders University; Biology Society of South Australia; Department of Environment and Water; Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment","keywords":"Tourism; Recreation; TRIPS architecture; Geography; Fishery; Marine protected area; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Tracking (education); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Engineering; Transport engineering; Habitat","score_opus":0.21939662343062563,"score_gpt":0.38262843733692486,"score_spread":0.16323181390629923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127926664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5739862,0.4151351,0.00055498164,0.0024765425,0.00036331773,0.004443537,0.0000982399,0.000098544486,0.002843551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50464517,0.4941338,0.000010022993,0.0009969597,0.00005253983,0.00007427896,0.000022965862,0.000011631026,0.000052614407],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785084,0.0007139492,0.00048439656,0.00032069164,0.0004029719,0.00022717933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960572,0.0029440746,0.0005775256,0.00030731183,0.000053333893,0.00006056053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016511183,0.0002403052,0.00058042404,0.000015030475,0.0005388445,0.000036594032,0.00056837546,0.00017288177,0.0005728952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002524243,0.000099714365,0.00020110798,0.00048402874,0.00030905576,0.000038980757,0.00096842163,0.00036519882,0.000008710886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023016812,0.0005965593,0.45265755,0.003146143,0.0007929941,0.000016930606,0.0003352872,0.0016274726,0.002831422,0.0037971986,0.004871495,0.5290968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013946214,0.00026664988,0.6926293,0.00045632146,0.00011036412,0.00002047972,0.000052052717,0.00003642618,0.000011639659,0.00015537083,0.30585262,0.0002693314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069090794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019726097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5288274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047236032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007608286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6272801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129634834","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108992","title":"A synthesis of the prevalence and drivers of non-compliance in marine protected areas","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, Australian Research Council; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Marine protected area; Business; Enforcement; Livelihood; Compliance (psychology); Corporate governance; Fishing; Environmental resource management; Fisheries management; Resource (disambiguation); Adaptive management; Environmental planning; Fishery; Geography; Ecology; Psychology; Habitat; Computer science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.03373487846077171,"score_gpt":0.22494043871929925,"score_spread":0.19120556025852753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129634834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985712,0.000013354611,0.000008098734,0.0004953738,0.000014499194,0.00016151677,0.0000037332043,0.0000032963737,0.0007289285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999469,0.00004709588,0.0002779409,0.000034719364,0.0000019591491,0.000023840446,5.3967096e-7,7.3467174e-7,0.0001442043],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960846,0.000052807874,0.00012253849,0.000111108035,0.000053105294,0.000051998544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997431,0.000088302564,0.00006940758,0.00007651575,0.000014230948,0.000008435808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000085329855,0.00003923201,0.00009487651,0.0000046880627,0.000022226073,0.0000014812689,0.000059507693,0.00002493048,0.0001203343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034961855,0.000023320566,0.000016406233,0.00015999386,0.000121103505,0.000024336412,0.00027862325,0.000028949366,0.0000015336449],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009929006,0.000021830996,0.9552238,0.000050943225,0.0000018596809,5.00512e-7,0.00002060583,7.153834e-7,0.041513693,0.000024750727,0.000015940097,0.0031154223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063504456,0.000021303718,0.98749316,0.000054286164,0.0000027923659,0.0000012160228,0.000019412711,0.00020059395,0.011771346,0.00023862346,0.000104519946,0.000029264746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035859723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032384245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03226933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015211548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004886667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13175762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139301940","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109062","title":"Spatial population genetics reveals competitive imbalances threatening local apex predator persistence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada; W. Garfield Weston Foundation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Canis; Biology; Niche; Apex predator; Ecology; Niche differentiation; Population; Ecological niche; Gray wolf; Competition (biology); Geography; Predation; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.03873441486442593,"score_gpt":0.23822063129821094,"score_spread":0.199486216433785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139301940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888759,0.000082758714,0.007052891,0.0020522522,0.00016041637,0.00017232318,0.000010918325,0.00006174684,0.0015307649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939945,0.000051214298,0.0021151393,0.0032633923,0.00006689488,0.00002520787,0.00027753436,0.000005085298,0.00020103641],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875367,0.00023359647,0.00026683466,0.00038367198,0.00015616736,0.00020607139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942756,0.00016985455,0.00013292125,0.0001475463,0.000048046742,0.000074092895],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022444727,0.00012645526,0.00016178167,0.000012683639,0.00021630606,0.00002639233,0.00011718387,0.00018572886,0.0011725109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027477776,0.00011031071,0.000052701165,0.00019020766,0.00022889115,0.00015234515,0.000114895636,0.0001118802,0.00016528238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036041,0.0000392997,0.99041533,0.0000030869483,0.000007987724,0.00000775977,0.000039942843,0.000096110096,0.003705676,0.0006194808,0.0003990577,0.004630243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021219668,0.00009708224,0.9907986,0.0000130425615,0.000012020194,0.000011678288,0.000149607,0.004966772,0.0006381584,0.0014996915,0.001451312,0.00014986287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022195723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056277524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005118567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112428854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025719002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154139075","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109101","title":"Conservation status of the world's skinks (Scincidae): Taxonomic and geographic patterns in extinction risk","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"Australian Research Council; Israel Science Foundation; Rufford Foundation; Queen's University; Monash University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Skink; IUCN Red List; Threatened species; Conservation status; Biology; Data deficient; Ecology; Near-threatened species; Endangered species; Conservation biology; Umbrella species; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Habitat; Geography; Lizard","score_opus":0.02092186499111915,"score_gpt":0.2223952194157323,"score_spread":0.20147335442461314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154139075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99793816,0.00006987485,0.0001457554,0.0008120058,0.00010898247,0.00018344691,0.000016928258,0.000013778303,0.0007110717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99837565,0.00037184265,0.00024044976,0.0008331355,0.000015757687,0.000014675549,0.000027210992,0.000003016042,0.0001182401],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989094,0.00030495052,0.0002626761,0.00026603774,0.00007369041,0.00018323293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994503,0.00015039732,0.00018790121,0.00015631758,0.000015179202,0.00003984967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024431152,0.00008940034,0.00012812976,0.00003170147,0.000080378755,0.000009369806,0.000072702474,0.00012206065,0.00057220476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020674158,0.000057853926,0.000043439308,0.00030069347,0.00031553282,0.000063909836,0.00014003129,0.00013284972,0.000009587093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023782224,0.000032805397,0.98485255,0.0000028997017,0.0000033449394,0.0000010097822,0.00002230448,0.000014676938,0.0110082505,0.00019564557,0.000108647706,0.0037340934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026473103,0.00004191233,0.9866718,0.000010932498,0.000005304647,0.000003378477,0.00006753572,0.0005392931,0.0013392442,0.0005067913,0.010472109,0.0000769406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021497305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0127537325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0106040025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006406097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019188787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7116882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160998229","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109128","title":"Incorporating climate change in a harvest risk assessment for polar bears Ursus maritimus in Southern Hudson Bay","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs; Government of Quebec; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University; Government of Nunavut; University of Alberta; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Washington","keywords":"Ursus maritimus; Climate change; Sea ice; Geography; Bay; Arctic; Population; Environmental science; Wildlife management; Wildlife; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.07306148026606667,"score_gpt":0.2977313162747241,"score_spread":0.22466983600865742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160998229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99636155,0.00012703464,0.00010133797,0.0015619817,0.000043334247,0.00050958036,0.000093048606,0.00002421881,0.0011778845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99105245,0.00022438566,0.006837087,0.0014700391,0.00003457547,0.000243139,0.000110275396,0.00000759829,0.000020468235],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987034,0.00022924381,0.00031172668,0.00035986223,0.00011745764,0.00027828178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948376,0.00020044399,0.00014463645,0.000114846924,0.000018009252,0.000038271675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076600624,0.00012516422,0.00020456349,0.000020291205,0.00010028195,0.000032475924,0.00010353021,0.000104305895,0.0003476185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039184568,0.000107377404,0.000047170783,0.00030534875,0.00006783102,0.00013669483,0.00033518253,0.00014720001,0.000038583225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031460964,0.00008993543,0.9829384,0.000014377785,0.0000026569921,0.000012149872,0.000084104424,0.0000072420958,0.0006472642,0.00062932645,0.0000273707,0.015515724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000488711,0.00014749786,0.99370486,0.000029054465,0.0000046635173,0.0000010890438,0.00027426385,0.0024679762,0.000017027054,0.0010797989,0.0016466957,0.0001383712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013428677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08555204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07212336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019447443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011293081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164035390","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109168","title":"Range-wide declines of northern spotted owl populations in the Pacific Northwest: A meta-analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"College of Arts and Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; U.S. Bureau of Land Management; U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; William Talbott Hillman Foundation; Oregon State University; Colorado State University","keywords":"Occupancy; Habitat; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Population; Population decline; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.17134770568031252,"score_gpt":0.3094550218716824,"score_spread":0.13810731619136987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164035390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99594444,0.000063316256,0.00017078384,0.003484895,0.00001781197,0.00013669215,0.000022456212,0.000010562249,0.00014904473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979879,0.0000057977363,0.00076501636,0.0008938496,0.0000051405427,0.000041471318,0.0001912593,0.000001846416,0.000107691245],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989589,0.00033028264,0.00029130082,0.00020251001,0.000106788844,0.00011022072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935186,0.00028416803,0.00011184566,0.00020101467,0.00003259595,0.000018540997],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032170562,0.00008043651,0.0002688031,0.000029639248,0.00007669356,0.000007216171,0.0001288667,0.00010077733,0.0020862282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029722275,0.000045282424,0.00022500873,0.0010541836,0.0001493872,0.00005604393,0.000039854036,0.000079089994,0.000043650416],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000869794,0.00011607927,0.99885345,5.533144e-7,0.00029140202,0.0000092798755,0.00007821186,0.00014251778,0.00033224229,0.000039051,0.0000433167,0.00008521259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008341099,0.000023128385,0.99569726,2.57932e-7,0.00318888,0.0000017593509,0.00014578892,0.00005775182,0.000039053753,0.00034639405,0.00035793986,0.000058359386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004035441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059160993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05875745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019985162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009919917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165070499","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109175","title":"Global COVID-19 lockdown highlights humans as both threats and custodians of the environment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"COVID-19 impact on air quality","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nunavut Arctic College; Université du Québec à Rimouski; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Simon Fraser University; McMaster University; Victoria Heart Institute Foundation; Carleton University; Wildlife Conservation Society Canada; World Wildlife Fund Canada; University of Manitoba; University of Victoria; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; Tula Foundation; University of Toronto; Dalhousie University; University of British Columbia; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Ocean Networks Canada Society; Espace pour la vie; Parks Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Red Sea Research Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology; Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development; Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Horizon 2020; Seventh Framework Programme; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; Australian Research Council; Natural Environment Research Council; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; South Central Climate Adaptation Science Center; Disney Conservation Fund; California State University Long Beach; Council on Ocean Affairs Science and Technology, California State University; U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; National Science and Technology Major Project; Vlaamse regering; Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund; Provincia Autonoma di Trento; Regione Toscana; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Università di Pisa; Universidad de Costa Rica; Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Institut Polaire Français Paul Emile Victor; National Major Science and Technology Projects of China; European Regional Development Fund; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Department of Conservation, New Zealand; Ministry of Education, India; Cape Eleuthera Foundation; Labex; King Abdullah University of Science and Technology; Ministry of Environment; Biology Society of South Australia; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; National Parks Board - Singapore; Ian Potter Foundation; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; European Commission; Sight Research UK; Canada Research Chairs; National Geographic Society; Virginia Marine Resources Commission; Simon Fraser University; Canada First Research Excellence Fund; Commission for Environmental Cooperation; Tula Foundation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; University of Tasmania; Hakai Institute; Fundación Charles Darwin; Agência Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigação, Tecnologia e Inovação; Save Our Seas Foundation; ArcticNet; David and Elaine Potter Foundation; Department of Environment and Water; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Primate Conservation; National Pork Board; Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS); Australian Institute of Marine Science; Boston University; Fondation Bertarelli; South African National Parks; Liber Ero Foundation; A.G. Leventis Foundation; Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales; Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Canada Foundation for Innovation; Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Wildlife; Pandemic; Custodians; Biodiversity; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Geography; Business; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Biology; Environmental science; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.07475789187892563,"score_gpt":0.3219177236553838,"score_spread":0.24715983177645817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165070499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9739136,0.00014225117,0.00091182685,0.02313977,0.000053451105,0.00024110486,0.00005145335,0.000033031072,0.0015134946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98546445,0.00015365082,0.00026727672,0.013759843,0.000012252158,0.000010673065,0.000017481101,0.00000314015,0.00031123994],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861723,0.0003212503,0.0002518483,0.00036559132,0.00025616187,0.00018793653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999139,0.0002199028,0.00013045967,0.00034528747,0.0000064369056,0.00015889954],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003345038,0.00013214527,0.00015959759,0.00000648181,0.00018672447,0.000019139012,0.00018353715,0.00012942901,0.0023338737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048597838,0.00008328589,0.00006634367,0.00018815132,0.0005563778,0.000072321425,0.00032485375,0.00006552314,0.000076955774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002455424,0.00010891818,0.9820793,0.000010207563,0.0000085465745,0.0000066505395,0.00013843263,0.00012334659,0.009078938,0.0057280515,0.0013366608,0.0013563609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029028795,0.00007754901,0.92079455,0.000004293801,0.0000111980435,0.000007156738,0.000056075358,0.00006096057,0.0010617471,0.009361041,0.06815839,0.000116739466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015329978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071048323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06682173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047908726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000078846846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166246801","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109204","title":"The conservation and ecological impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Geography; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Ecology; Nature Conservation; Biology; Virology; Medicine; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Outbreak; Disease","score_opus":0.13805349281896856,"score_gpt":0.36302958664941637,"score_spread":0.2249760938304478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166246801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90480185,0.0005282823,0.00007327374,0.09375149,0.00008787606,0.00027876312,0.000012628641,0.000028142988,0.00043767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95665616,0.0005802728,0.000102465536,0.04243324,0.00004512857,0.000014017785,0.000039454688,0.0000025562015,0.00012669133],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897784,0.00029116974,0.000280348,0.00016284641,0.000129432,0.00015838837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981871,0.0011170654,0.00013001489,0.00019810973,0.0001736131,0.0001940905],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007291219,0.00007474928,0.00016106984,0.000010640108,0.00021858123,0.00002136342,0.00006452191,0.00012983294,0.00012860507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008481182,0.000032924734,0.0000619628,0.00020294097,0.00028210765,0.000029036915,0.000065075394,0.00012372069,0.0000020849736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012316652,0.00007046907,0.97818327,0.000043560565,0.000015701184,0.00000389973,0.00003202349,3.9923327e-7,0.0019571166,0.0139985,0.003004306,0.0025676137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005518707,0.00014789247,0.90219355,0.000012505975,0.000019983543,0.00006428197,0.00018273824,0.0001914585,0.000038612077,0.0031129604,0.09344379,0.000040341514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016166292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001623433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090439476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061075734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080042495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3178457707","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109238","title":"Integrating multiple indices of geobiodiversity reveals a series of regional species-rich areas worthy of conservation in the region of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Species richness; Endemism; Taxon; Biodiversity; Ecology; Geography; Plateau (mathematics); Phylogenetic tree; Phylogenetic diversity; Species diversity; Biology","score_opus":0.055241648740844765,"score_gpt":0.2292556241896358,"score_spread":0.17401397544879105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3178457707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99657565,0.00004793089,0.00007790557,0.0025677895,0.00003479372,0.0001843373,0.000019402094,0.0000037205175,0.0004884662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989725,0.00006592211,0.0005177232,0.00033772367,0.0000040805508,0.0000061714404,0.000032186603,0.0000011809386,0.00006254789],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988861,0.00033604173,0.0004037193,0.00014236273,0.00014858627,0.00008319289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860394,0.00057798636,0.00058044755,0.00013762042,0.00009198617,0.00000803404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044980497,0.00007495123,0.00020430493,0.000024248262,0.00009540193,0.0000025977479,0.0001801212,0.000100834324,0.00004268899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010043881,0.000044270815,0.000059036596,0.00043015555,0.000706133,0.00009942035,0.00013307588,0.00009915218,6.295258e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008456436,0.00008013862,0.97984004,0.00002327859,0.000013383144,9.63996e-7,0.0011892425,0.00008532959,0.015282156,0.0031096837,0.00024462363,0.00004658939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020870581,0.00009809534,0.99236554,0.00004829584,0.000010329692,0.0000037517568,0.0022867029,0.00025254485,0.002395723,0.0021835964,0.00010234031,0.00004439677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042381475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003679853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012886433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030119583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023165821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26017767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181484852","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109230","title":"Road-effect mitigation promotes connectivity and reduces mortality at the population-level","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; Laurentian University","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","keywords":"Fencing; Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Population; Habitat; Geography; Fishery; Ecology; Biology; Computer science; Demography","score_opus":0.05563042347380104,"score_gpt":0.2858275691974989,"score_spread":0.23019714572369787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181484852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99331474,0.000046483758,0.00010959528,0.005463039,0.00011541386,0.0002853161,0.000016768367,0.000045078654,0.0006035793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979417,0.00001870145,0.00018560507,0.0010507221,0.00004067216,0.00006440757,0.00022386866,0.0000043773675,0.00046997122],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987924,0.00036798837,0.00021511159,0.00033706552,0.00015542055,0.00013202665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928564,0.00033304145,0.00012426358,0.00018094278,0.00003380048,0.00004231925],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046185838,0.00011755306,0.00012235882,0.000010099328,0.00040483163,0.00006135982,0.00006480043,0.0000992108,0.00093599485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073044316,0.00007596869,0.000045880184,0.00020256457,0.00017236818,0.00026340617,0.00012838405,0.000095392876,0.000057400226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018264227,0.00003181635,0.92745066,0.000002856691,0.000010506415,0.0000012224523,0.00003171625,0.000012798716,0.062107205,0.00022414576,0.0007602945,0.009348526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013830501,0.00006702483,0.9820109,0.000008514247,0.000013835365,0.000015107028,0.00002877784,0.0015747397,0.013782467,0.0008947316,0.0013585978,0.00010698758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017196317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010854766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054560263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011226866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001063792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183235696","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109257","title":"Corrigendum to ‘Conservation through co-occurrence: Woodland caribou as a focal species for boreal biodiversity [Biol. Conserv. 232 (2019) 238–252]’","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Nature Conservancy of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; McGill University; University of British Columbia; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Boreal; Biodiversity; Geography; Environmental science; Woodland; Ecology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.19160432813729739,"score_gpt":0.39213035009910385,"score_spread":0.20052602196180647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183235696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28390554,0.0071900333,0.0052759573,0.12476751,0.2776578,0.035657004,0.14830104,0.0018397829,0.115405336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009413035,0.012902531,0.004333846,0.1949918,0.012561072,0.005571842,0.49805626,0.0001746708,0.26199493],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936867,0.0009904644,0.0014123645,0.0014272834,0.0004226492,0.002060564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99437445,0.0013089546,0.0010332703,0.0006514308,0.002331736,0.00030013305],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013067271,0.00081461755,0.001614832,0.00017546104,0.0059007183,0.000072385716,0.000617953,0.0031072884,0.0011741761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030812605,0.0006866088,0.0004142829,0.0005267688,0.00043721043,0.00015934149,0.0006582744,0.0017919678,0.0007682881],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057224557,0.00014224471,0.1164785,0.00032787875,0.00019240777,0.000025974401,0.0032910425,2.170682e-7,0.00003261242,0.002950246,0.87588453,0.00010211585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011572323,0.0012442512,0.08221016,0.00018508712,0.00014155441,0.0000069942353,0.007547277,0.000020097688,0.000012958508,0.0007197673,0.9059954,0.0007591936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027857687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03631939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34975526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011689418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003585438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186113490","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109254","title":"Response to: Multiple measures of biodiversity change make for the strongest analyses with historical data","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Biodiversity; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.6990447762491367,"score_gpt":0.31795940352604596,"score_spread":0.3810853727230908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186113490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9780623,0.0005631876,0.00005535158,0.020386534,0.00002835508,0.0002107546,0.00066513504,0.000020754382,0.000007643247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985047,0.00008504679,0.00030179915,0.0007667524,0.00007130102,0.000019923738,0.0002050169,2.1155894e-7,0.000045236193],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993179,0.0001109638,0.00010891487,0.00023000501,0.00011049666,0.000121724865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998226,0.0014643003,0.000060767623,0.000051770443,0.00016375516,0.000033442935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033943256,0.0000759296,0.00014536234,0.0000049170812,0.00021942455,0.00001541804,0.00023820679,0.00005070942,0.000017052984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088465936,0.000021270938,0.000038560436,0.00022057192,0.00005105534,0.00003874929,0.00015817257,0.000036390644,0.000002432157],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002132423,0.00008772712,0.55545807,0.0000031688683,0.00004410977,0.000003625118,0.00003509907,7.692571e-7,0.42513362,0.000026750246,0.00494652,0.012128093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010013769,0.000386949,0.84330064,0.000005572207,0.000019245856,0.0000011937669,0.00019825573,0.0000395647,0.0015133881,0.000006466794,0.1543655,0.00006309549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007129439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009213962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42362022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023576064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007969778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5141607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203355648","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109329","title":"Climate variability has idiosyncratic impacts on North American aerial insectivorous bird population trajectories","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Insectivore; Climate change; Population; Ecology; Geography; Storm; Breeding bird survey; Annual cycle; North Atlantic oscillation; Environmental science; Habitat; Climatology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.06199409021846784,"score_gpt":0.2625905083181821,"score_spread":0.20059641809971424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203355648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973092,0.000004763486,0.000059125712,0.0011029554,0.00021262118,0.00017745688,0.000082201164,0.00016961218,0.0008820614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99807084,0.000044810484,0.00008653816,0.001252943,0.00006047746,0.000025048126,0.00044419678,0.000008031396,0.000007143415],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985997,0.00029092535,0.00026184422,0.00037341416,0.00019636373,0.0002777673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935645,0.00017257761,0.00013761314,0.00020918023,0.000031296488,0.000092898495],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025893288,0.00014974213,0.00019851315,0.0000135111095,0.00025573294,0.000077100456,0.00008686018,0.00007579156,0.0048905597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083102606,0.000118821714,0.00006343787,0.00050596916,0.00025609502,0.00012485635,0.00007812075,0.00010192834,0.0003200248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121556615,0.00013760658,0.9877154,0.0000048429574,0.000004298078,0.0000044142403,0.00004595947,0.000010897502,0.009400156,0.0007976828,0.000313751,0.0014433948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021349014,0.0002494735,0.99678636,0.000003604194,0.0000067441483,0.0000043475598,0.00011041927,0.000075229975,0.0009691886,0.00018763033,0.0012392328,0.00015426065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015998137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008461189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009070939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048312175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015821148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217180529","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109402","title":"Balancing conservation priorities for grassland and forest specialist bird communities in agriculturally dominated landscapes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of British Columbia; Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","keywords":"Threatened species; Grassland; Geography; Habitat; Agroforestry; Ecology; Biodiversity; Woodland; Bird conservation; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.04722691541079571,"score_gpt":0.25083944878470466,"score_spread":0.20361253337390894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217180529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99578446,0.00010038055,0.00007358341,0.0025145314,0.00006324258,0.00020492946,0.00007379614,0.000051149087,0.0011339285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978263,0.00027885125,0.00018252077,0.0008243748,0.000024600538,0.00004763691,0.00072730286,0.0000040136056,0.00008441605],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993436,0.00008438898,0.00019461031,0.00014439858,0.00007670598,0.00015634131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995143,0.0002759659,0.00006406274,0.0000703616,0.00004313285,0.000032214946],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019804228,0.000094416326,0.00013725394,0.000014434816,0.00014377129,0.00006845814,0.00006035096,0.00009329994,0.0012175058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021279881,0.000070891634,0.000026985132,0.00016083612,0.00012466978,0.00012708433,0.000071260234,0.000058763162,0.00001770896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040192546,0.000024272582,0.9878131,0.000011867861,0.0000028247732,0.0000025958768,0.00012999884,0.0000024801868,0.007234761,0.002334593,0.0020475078,0.00035579645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000568008,0.000051774987,0.9738032,0.000016196735,0.000003983854,0.000009054177,0.0028140962,0.00033804335,0.00032288887,0.00068423216,0.02127408,0.00011444463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014327569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0502468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048814043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012099028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008682479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200194726","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109379","title":"Coupling process-based and empirical models to assess management options to meet conservation goals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre For Cold Ocean Resources Engineering","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Ecosystem services; Clearing; Process (computing); Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Ecology; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.12844813686088244,"score_gpt":0.32638925551277365,"score_spread":0.1979411186518912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200194726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95406556,0.000019921441,0.034983065,0.00897242,0.00007922889,0.00076204893,0.00001436276,0.00010297486,0.0010004109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786168,0.000005562456,0.01198885,0.008959634,0.000021053813,0.00026171887,0.000049749095,0.00000972946,0.00008695212],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855673,0.000115390794,0.00029700663,0.00053490314,0.0002532028,0.0002427931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992451,0.00024008613,0.00006773493,0.00021307383,0.000059915197,0.00017411058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053928123,0.00015417735,0.0001907919,0.00004274465,0.00015865701,0.00007959887,0.0001303022,0.00011476521,0.00014643598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022744355,0.00013383884,0.00003123743,0.00055624964,0.00005224583,0.00017596716,0.00014897114,0.00005731205,0.00010209164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017513036,0.00038734204,0.82001644,0.00013428296,0.00003730654,0.000050649083,0.00025011427,0.09915746,0.059859917,0.006031337,0.011783306,0.0021167176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047305753,0.00025824108,0.4992295,0.00009003821,0.000021007854,0.000006163242,0.00015981242,0.48802084,0.003511848,0.0019043115,0.0059356275,0.00038956283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010457407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030496085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38886338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014581352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022502632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54577893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211164177","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109484","title":"Spatial mismatch in diversity facets reveals contrasting protection for New Zealand's cetacean biodiversity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Ministry for Primary Industries; Royal Society Te Apārangi; Department of Conservation, New Zealand","keywords":"Biodiversity; Species richness; Phylogenetic diversity; Biodiversity hotspot; Ecology; Geography; Endangered species; Species diversity; Marine protected area; Biology; Phylogenetic tree; Habitat","score_opus":0.08867325908653811,"score_gpt":0.23988047874993773,"score_spread":0.15120721966339962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211164177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99523616,0.000015653752,0.0006387308,0.0028729034,0.00007017844,0.0008620517,0.000029340003,0.0000420048,0.00023298187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984417,0.000010178875,0.00032353465,0.0008789447,0.000021863003,0.00004317242,0.0000352167,0.0000018296412,0.00024356651],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907386,0.00013554409,0.00016043964,0.0002855585,0.00015016609,0.00019440085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968266,0.00008322753,0.00011147887,0.00006848997,0.0000091225265,0.000045013243],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046959973,0.00009207566,0.00014797834,0.000016713218,0.00058584264,0.000009837221,0.0001551922,0.000047405036,0.0011022191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021307809,0.00008381941,0.000047993635,0.00017290744,0.000045295317,0.000074301664,0.0010633385,0.00011447138,0.000026467096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015875194,0.00004263865,0.9856003,0.0000040802406,0.0000037496968,0.0000014161994,0.00012574303,0.000036597365,0.0013405756,0.000012703967,0.006880039,0.0057933833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062172883,0.00028770923,0.9677218,0.0000023337248,0.0000060624434,0.0000012804521,0.000075406875,0.00041444582,0.00006277346,0.0005821945,0.030111868,0.00011237808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03354002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035734451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029966576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027305222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000069094604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220903545","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109523","title":"Using community science data to help identify threatened species occurrences outside of known ranges","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Threatened species; Citizen science; Rare species; Geography; Species distribution; Range (aeronautics); Extinction (optical mineralogy); Environmental niche modelling; Ecology; Global biodiversity; Environmental data; Land cover; Biodiversity; Data deficient; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Environmental science; Land use; Biology","score_opus":0.5371347070871427,"score_gpt":0.39638696071927976,"score_spread":0.14074774636786297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220903545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996156,0.000032705808,0.00012791208,0.000782418,0.00015637981,0.00017759566,0.00050265033,0.00003125001,0.0020331054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987951,0.00001527134,0.00027890375,0.0005766568,0.000009868956,0.00001183367,0.00026981664,0.0000019705444,0.00004061444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987647,0.00022625757,0.0002062203,0.0002570467,0.00035348732,0.00019227242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992451,0.00011310419,0.000113171714,0.00043885253,0.00002754676,0.0000621911],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013216793,0.00008338396,0.00012895648,0.00003822788,0.000788633,0.000037499678,0.0010097679,0.000025933994,0.014771801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042550097,0.000067618086,0.000023690001,0.0007259763,0.00070019957,0.00021475449,0.0022543562,0.00012302857,0.000057397323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049096125,0.00014581655,0.5050235,0.0000045723364,0.0000033359413,9.065902e-7,0.00026950182,0.00007114264,0.4898482,0.00066972204,0.0031586422,0.00075555366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012126847,0.00012867495,0.97579956,0.0000040525165,0.0000054738625,0.0000027645256,0.0051989434,0.000474568,0.0058741355,0.00016196238,0.01211709,0.000111488676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001471323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036154228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48397407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028083025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020379015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9861288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226021556","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109535","title":"Research priorities for the conservation of chondrichthyans in Latin America","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología; Instituto Politécnico Nacional","keywords":"Geography; Latin Americans; Fishery; Biology; Political science","score_opus":0.11273432541697277,"score_gpt":0.3286652372522851,"score_spread":0.21593091183531232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226021556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99009454,0.0000533283,0.000350605,0.0076592844,0.0001116954,0.00050577504,0.000015846881,0.000013233397,0.0011957113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99663705,0.000028744753,0.00063858705,0.001748534,0.000018171777,0.00038762702,0.000038153757,0.000002883618,0.0005002519],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988773,0.00041836352,0.00021445841,0.00017750156,0.00012361283,0.00018874732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983632,0.0014061672,0.000069401074,0.00012446058,0.000023885537,0.000012894476],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011759184,0.000056163903,0.00010782028,0.000037750327,0.00028911175,0.000003526455,0.00021810275,0.00006195423,0.0010936637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005104407,0.000038046892,0.00003009472,0.00039924897,0.0005335841,0.000036175985,0.00028024588,0.00018956761,0.00001528711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031123453,0.00006966942,0.9636781,0.0000039435686,0.0000058665173,7.675956e-7,0.00024407708,0.00032825622,0.015340783,0.007937958,0.0075159944,0.004563335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023938325,0.00044285847,0.84409034,8.796303e-7,0.0000021707601,0.0000013143747,0.00047841918,0.001953203,0.00016911527,0.00361057,0.14896107,0.000050645707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002376292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053933903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14144507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008209806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025660416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280504041","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109584","title":"The normative postulate problem: Hidden values in ecology, evolution, and conservation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Normative; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Biodiversity; Ecology; Computer science; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.030490410850881316,"score_gpt":0.23594392942048956,"score_spread":0.20545351856960825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280504041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724248,0.000075483826,0.00002496142,0.025612017,0.000054512075,0.00035135399,0.000009523516,0.000024540659,0.0014227774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964801,0.00006425674,0.00029705133,0.0028777292,0.000010814717,0.00011641675,0.000034882043,0.0000034958312,0.00011526284],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988105,0.00042377267,0.00022855183,0.00021422982,0.00015695013,0.00016598939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994049,0.0003569233,0.00010297636,0.000099743294,0.0000054138313,0.000030063356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009083222,0.00008898351,0.000083210296,0.000016541911,0.0007254422,0.000017221782,0.00014052982,0.000070868016,0.00020827718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011396081,0.00006341132,0.000018837532,0.00018374772,0.00053646736,0.00014895393,0.0003595679,0.0002467274,0.000042501597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006956397,0.000054323093,0.9849761,0.0000019692932,0.0000040635246,0.0000017866486,0.000358629,0.00018804819,0.00233401,0.010414118,0.0010244038,0.0005729552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019990213,0.00016113115,0.8531514,0.0000016605768,0.0000025587372,0.000005841829,0.0003757542,0.0010929379,0.000027434018,0.14088035,0.0040168236,0.00008422251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005462707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035087555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13182475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002662197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009355159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55795884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280594854","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109597","title":"Ruling the roost: Avian species reclaim urban habitat during India's COVID-19 lockdown","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Geography; Habitat; Threatened species; Species richness; Wildlife; Ecology; Population; Environmental protection; Biology","score_opus":0.06026150002579722,"score_gpt":0.2604410278643768,"score_spread":0.20017952783857956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280594854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97508365,0.000107406966,0.00010044542,0.022672739,0.00011708816,0.00035034725,0.000022264623,0.00008636609,0.0014596743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985439,0.000032497846,0.00017534629,0.012580358,0.00008931394,0.00007735966,0.000051527753,0.0000068399363,0.0015477426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986068,0.0002866187,0.0002216197,0.00032070783,0.00026251518,0.00030174945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992884,0.00021789831,0.00012648517,0.00022511532,0.0000058282967,0.00013629186],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006390046,0.00012024935,0.00012603374,0.000026644391,0.0014261648,0.000033867876,0.0003111809,0.00006416776,0.0043902844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021795197,0.00008097472,0.000056253124,0.00033936495,0.00023361809,0.00008856154,0.00037627053,0.00028674616,0.00017482549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050606315,0.000030433452,0.9836454,0.000004247466,0.0000034028653,0.000008332621,0.00045008564,0.000130009,0.0030987419,0.00050093565,0.011952203,0.00012562645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019737172,0.00013112777,0.8647449,0.0000015609718,0.0000037015388,0.000009619623,0.00051336293,0.00012296818,0.000052428873,0.00050892716,0.1335957,0.0001183092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011057856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011285996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121643506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005034528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003998487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282006037","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109595","title":"Scientists' warning of an imperiled ocean","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coastal and Marine Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Marine ecosystem; Biodiversity; Warning system; Fishing; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Greenhouse gas; Business; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Interim; Environmental protection; Geography; Fishery; Ecology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.021819453817702995,"score_gpt":0.22256186011769732,"score_spread":0.20074240629999432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282006037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99258924,0.0000028745967,0.00015069351,0.00031120068,0.00006652193,0.00010657367,0.0000048607662,0.000028397684,0.0067396155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863154,0.000001216214,0.00042237318,0.00040821036,0.000007007233,0.000008789075,0.00004545705,0.0000016912525,0.00047369127],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943155,0.00007513155,0.00010942354,0.00015770458,0.00013628195,0.00008991634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998037,0.000017866152,0.000055541204,0.00009268519,0.0000037332768,0.000026436486],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030365045,0.000042449057,0.00005618437,0.000014381174,0.00015229546,0.0000067701376,0.00013549722,0.00001075694,0.0040219077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035518206,0.000033978155,0.000021391535,0.00018275254,0.0000836502,0.000060434726,0.0015391055,0.000042826265,0.000013950352],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013748133,0.00038994802,0.738707,0.000007502183,0.000008143747,0.0000114146,0.00026853028,0.0016350262,0.09531086,0.00521745,0.0063822763,0.15192434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024793684,0.0005792899,0.89139014,9.659057e-7,0.0000040253803,0.0000035511155,0.00024869785,0.005170293,0.0005497417,0.0037927101,0.09789264,0.0001199913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036153727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025288195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15268312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041947504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000030287938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283457000","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109633","title":"Conservation assessment of raptors within the USA and Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"BirdLife International; M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Threatened species; Endangered species; Conservation status; Geography; Critically endangered; Near-threatened species; Population; Conservation-dependent species; CITES; Wildlife; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.036385941249101016,"score_gpt":0.2555790989318526,"score_spread":0.21919315768275158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283457000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965513,0.000004400065,0.00003930417,0.0028759572,0.000097873475,0.00016006097,0.000011505362,0.000005631683,0.0002540104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965334,0.0000018527662,0.00024233895,0.0030119198,0.000004182681,0.00004333177,0.000018497947,0.000001416853,0.00014303831],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935806,0.00017459305,0.0001494265,0.00012210177,0.00012353643,0.00007228896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996416,0.00013971572,0.00011595514,0.00007708353,0.000006325936,0.000019351017],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003683729,0.000048965754,0.0000674804,0.000005535776,0.00026397276,0.000003287725,0.00009674789,0.00002852785,0.0015216382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004772958,0.000031469877,0.000010958379,0.00008556575,0.00020275165,0.00003387268,0.00013330505,0.00010043218,0.0000014199943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008784011,0.000020203322,0.99441075,5.9439566e-7,0.0000020773539,0.00000105559,0.000018674544,0.00006129834,0.0033214793,0.0005294698,0.001473385,0.00015223904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009591227,0.00010490036,0.99507505,4.5876507e-7,0.000004983503,0.000003823963,0.00013871214,0.00037232143,0.00015508647,0.00014305383,0.0038608992,0.000044819375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17331386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44946608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27615222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011024591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062549356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288422072","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109675","title":"Strong phenological shifts among bumblebee species in North America can help predict extinction risk","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phenology; Bumblebee; Climate change; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Ecology; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Pollinator; Pollination","score_opus":0.07155739258975387,"score_gpt":0.20178095391666698,"score_spread":0.1302235613269131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288422072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971897,0.00011988806,0.0000049195446,0.0011970965,0.00007721554,0.0002725917,0.00036633527,0.00013506255,0.00063716836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985008,0.0002517634,0.00002566319,0.00037629058,0.00017632017,0.00011555524,0.00045152608,7.990523e-7,0.0001012484],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983738,0.00034780556,0.0003028268,0.0004052671,0.00022204492,0.00034824858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936527,0.00032475163,0.00018506809,0.000029392466,0.00003492262,0.000060565442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002505539,0.00017270494,0.00024639245,0.000019810182,0.0006319031,0.00003703284,0.00023657184,0.00008156719,0.0008969118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021111975,0.00007089672,0.00008121475,0.00057426794,0.00016783735,0.000076269425,0.00024797363,0.00033118943,0.000011800882],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012430461,0.00010311439,0.9858314,0.0000010302105,0.000008455422,0.000009502563,0.0000534376,0.000038497066,0.0054536574,0.00008383511,0.00045236538,0.007840447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014662625,0.00071671134,0.97151285,0.000002712628,0.000006039976,0.000001609544,0.0012511777,0.0002865987,0.00002279009,0.00020222884,0.025673203,0.0001774446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001810765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026921848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025220837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084259176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000709623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309306996","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109815","title":"Past and present effects of habitat amount and fragmentation per se on plant species richness, composition and traits in a deforestation hotspot","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva","keywords":"Species richness; Habitat fragmentation; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat; Forest fragmentation; Hotspot (geology); Deforestation (computer science); Ecology; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.01823267879601456,"score_gpt":0.22661688292872142,"score_spread":0.20838420413270686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309306996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985659,0.00007893443,0.00013222358,0.0007876472,0.000026539281,0.00031285803,0.000016760003,0.000008327465,0.00007077706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992597,0.00008523279,0.00020522755,0.00028267605,0.000004954226,0.00007933329,0.00006892056,0.0000019107981,0.000012046869],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939597,0.00014525231,0.00013414188,0.00016780295,0.00008333764,0.00007352353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995583,0.00031743041,0.00007554968,0.000025330595,0.000005938704,0.000017443926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015334775,0.000067089815,0.000096952965,0.000036832316,0.00015884293,0.0000073378988,0.000021999966,0.000034620494,0.000023352874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028318198,0.00005527703,0.000007616965,0.0000728642,0.00018628717,0.00007263787,0.0000707182,0.00006438179,8.1754575e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011846394,0.00008339748,0.9806584,0.000022620752,0.0000046381647,0.0000022699355,0.0008674832,0.00044313245,0.015830627,0.001478133,0.000040214574,0.00045061976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045674798,0.00039915214,0.9934239,0.0000073883425,0.000005842785,0.000004172784,0.0002819687,0.003926501,0.0001705407,0.0012215853,0.000040612023,0.00006158127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000524363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024133228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015660087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005063172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019209285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22541319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309342704","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109817","title":"Centres of neo- and paleo-endemism for Chinese woody flora and their environmental features","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Endemism; China; Geography; Biodiversity; Ecology; Clade; Flora (microbiology); Biology; Phylogenetic tree; Paleontology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01245270705296909,"score_gpt":0.214994403861205,"score_spread":0.20254169680823592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309342704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99812037,0.00043183984,0.00008681202,0.0008755477,0.000039978004,0.00019588825,0.000062544714,0.00001018877,0.00017683896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986783,0.0001268384,0.0003267531,0.0006181144,0.000008732228,0.000054383552,0.000055088083,0.000002135638,0.00012963093],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954927,0.000061981926,0.000102883445,0.00016071278,0.000039444993,0.000085715394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963295,0.00023194682,0.000062703446,0.0000453866,0.0000018082227,0.000025218902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014875068,0.0000710559,0.000099137156,0.000010257822,0.00024994113,0.000003571237,0.00004761037,0.00004070118,0.00018729448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007700072,0.00004826621,0.00001983842,0.000037060836,0.00020481474,0.000037159443,0.00017495536,0.00005747822,6.650467e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050785722,0.00003830929,0.9860681,0.0000034625625,0.000009856952,2.320379e-7,0.0003640198,0.000041656585,0.011290363,0.00039357503,0.00030190506,0.0014377048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026091328,0.00017955607,0.9915106,6.579542e-7,0.0000036675033,0.000003826274,0.00047483447,0.0012646014,0.000058579317,0.004288007,0.0018933843,0.00006132736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017563496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005924915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011231784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018573533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019534789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20507433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312085161","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109841","title":"Smaller human populations are neither a necessary nor sufficient condition for biodiversity conservation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Natural resource economics; Population; Agricultural biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Consumption (sociology); Measurement of biodiversity; Business; Sustainability; Environmental resource management; Economics; Ecosystem; Ecology; Biodiversity conservation; Biology","score_opus":0.13639407314324664,"score_gpt":0.3244862043690152,"score_spread":0.18809213122576857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312085161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855598,0.000028047838,0.0008392329,0.011678965,0.00015715588,0.000597238,0.00026623125,0.00014454423,0.0007287373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99307597,0.0000019441868,0.00018429643,0.00289989,0.000045236906,0.00033346473,0.0027871823,0.0000064743913,0.0006655413],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824375,0.0005161364,0.0003002485,0.00038478867,0.0002452154,0.0003098791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895245,0.00022986249,0.0001674752,0.00021634068,0.00036134923,0.00007250014],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006646965,0.00014342788,0.00018462552,0.0001006657,0.0016383464,0.00004332471,0.00021307498,0.00013408673,0.0010645776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005176301,0.00013278726,0.00011969851,0.00039655162,0.00014302676,0.00012469839,0.00016600353,0.00020938231,0.000018193086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006321116,0.0006733202,0.5926102,0.000042210682,0.000045945122,0.0000090352905,0.00020525936,0.0124397585,0.0031872597,0.3678519,0.021716764,0.00058623124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011725656,0.0005662315,0.7335112,0.0000048357365,0.000019887664,0.0000036904573,0.002574214,0.0052776155,0.00012221473,0.02800512,0.22845271,0.00028970125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032489193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011067484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33984682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029712857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006417575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313594739","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109883","title":"The application gap: Genomics for biodiversity and ecosystem service management","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Horizon 2020; Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; Centro Singular de Investigación de Galicia; Xunta de Galicia; European Regional Development Fund; European Commission; Gutenberg Forschungskolleg; Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS; Generalitat Valenciana; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; European Cooperation in Science and Technology","keywords":"Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Environmental resource management; Business; Genomics; Environmental planning; Ecosystem; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Genome; Economics","score_opus":0.05297404862478753,"score_gpt":0.2245489782368269,"score_spread":0.17157492961203938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313594739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99443054,0.000012422194,0.0003934542,0.0039473283,0.000045764828,0.0006264173,0.000056183595,0.00006979714,0.0004180618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950117,0.0011807102,0.001983988,0.0014074937,0.000016680666,0.00013571262,0.00013388187,0.0000031330073,0.00012673279],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994391,0.000035152363,0.000090359295,0.00022014075,0.00007633133,0.00013887104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996223,0.00018506275,0.000051522158,0.00010921277,0.000004910645,0.000027035168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032280135,0.00007043476,0.000057993602,0.000009388684,0.00071760116,0.000019795965,0.00014150738,0.000046498233,0.000011022048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001988007,0.000049327216,0.000020519914,0.00013963082,0.000088352775,0.000046427,0.00038236118,0.000030304656,0.0005900879],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054560394,0.000018890229,0.9695837,0.000020907351,0.000026301155,7.766772e-7,0.0001257123,0.000059531652,0.003877866,0.00055066036,0.013478967,0.012202137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015594372,0.000029986464,0.7893665,0.0000011053206,0.000009309142,3.6161322e-7,0.00049197575,0.0013235155,0.00010665113,0.00048644835,0.2079569,0.000071349175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005472032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001383343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19447793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115700444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":5.200175e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7584583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321485702","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109963","title":"Prioritizing taxa for genetic reference database development to advance inland water conservation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal; McGill Genome Centre; Concordia University; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi; Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; McGill University","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Groupe de recherche interuniversitaire en limnologie; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Genome Canada","keywords":"Barcode; Biodiversity; Taxon; Workflow; DNA barcoding; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biology; Endangered species; Water resources; Data deficient; Geography; Database; Business; Habitat; Computer science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.08702657531650097,"score_gpt":0.26751403383398475,"score_spread":0.18048745851748377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321485702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99566114,0.000011951866,0.0018264542,0.0014341172,0.00007809701,0.00062729174,0.0000628519,0.00010328762,0.0001948212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8553328,0.00009720651,0.13863824,0.004017932,0.000032615964,0.00029244635,0.0008970943,0.00001083344,0.0006808175],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988714,0.000041346164,0.00021731158,0.00040377348,0.00016613507,0.00030007475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959123,0.0001258105,0.000048545146,0.0001502678,0.00001290227,0.00007125549],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027647737,0.00013388199,0.00012074458,0.000030756026,0.00032697644,0.000019362227,0.00016632333,0.000070963695,0.0001086087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017428069,0.000100122634,0.000021047545,0.00016878823,0.00011746639,0.00012816655,0.00040970166,0.000053079235,0.0019963372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050980285,0.000023506265,0.8491866,0.0000111597055,0.0000062100207,0.000003722195,0.0001985213,0.000036594563,0.13986547,0.000022475391,0.0070340238,0.003560745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018284365,0.000081088896,0.7868558,0.000009848233,0.0000036137465,0.0000010027868,0.00007857857,0.0001202732,0.0060769836,0.00009145549,0.20634302,0.00015543772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007652241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003368467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.199309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001548051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000034893715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322102689","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109932","title":"The application of assisted migration as a climate change adaptation tactic: An evidence map and synthesis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; University of British Columbia; Carleton University","funders":"W. Garfield Weston Foundation; Parks Canada","keywords":"Threatened species; Climate change; Reforestation; Ecology; Geography; Environmental resource management; Population; Taxon; Adaptation (eye); Range (aeronautics); Environmental planning; Biology; Habitat; Environmental science","score_opus":0.20940853873194626,"score_gpt":0.3243535062937181,"score_spread":0.11494496756177186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322102689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99302226,0.00006237716,0.00020217543,0.00601071,0.00004040974,0.0003465538,0.000021963471,0.00008192628,0.00021161772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980689,0.001115443,0.00006350727,0.00031630867,0.000016591583,0.00028884568,0.00011084487,0.0000033609908,0.000016190159],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919635,0.00013456019,0.0001828347,0.00019736435,0.00015146367,0.00013740655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919605,0.00044682718,0.00014853083,0.0001385877,0.000029076778,0.000040913274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054526835,0.00007246708,0.00007659148,0.000016800464,0.00022428748,0.000034257926,0.00009408233,0.00007562614,0.000374283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004992148,0.000048360318,0.000022128643,0.00029667318,0.00016101699,0.0002627148,0.00006149885,0.000036579262,0.00028384133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036628245,0.0001620793,0.5392511,0.000043241576,0.00001145719,0.0000015876021,0.0007445678,0.000009110164,0.14614463,0.019985916,0.001221355,0.29205868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068541485,0.00011022269,0.98129207,0.000012297757,0.0000085054835,0.0000015390046,0.0011847814,0.008935955,0.0008970848,0.00035399167,0.00706355,0.00007143906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072119903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012638421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.442041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072764946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000034855466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40981364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322762476","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109968","title":"Stealth advocacy in ecology and conservation biology","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Credibility; Science policy; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Political science; Environmental policy; Citizen science; Environmental ethics; Ecosystem services; Public relations; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biology; Computer science; Public administration; Economics; Ecosystem; Law","score_opus":0.09634383610432856,"score_gpt":0.30683132725640466,"score_spread":0.2104874911520761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322762476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868114,0.0000139883705,0.0000148212575,0.010243785,0.00007999835,0.00017461822,0.000015733862,0.00009326096,0.0025523957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957508,0.00023960738,0.00003395398,0.0035004986,0.0000102627655,0.000040139523,0.0003145252,0.0000027433664,0.00010746404],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992026,0.000119895994,0.00018412923,0.00023257297,0.00004808003,0.0002127251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963886,0.00017539406,0.0000565842,0.00007558793,0.000008578613,0.00004497193],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003650965,0.0000758985,0.000111461006,0.000039022965,0.00007131344,0.000009791813,0.00006824491,0.00013608231,0.0043443795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026068403,0.00006201801,0.000015010024,0.0004051476,0.00021592139,0.00006189703,0.000108762644,0.00006847984,0.00087339216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001755961,0.00001976549,0.98269415,0.0000021809117,9.453109e-7,0.000001928456,0.00004071395,0.0000010747975,0.0060870512,0.005355916,0.004861703,0.0009169947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028920086,0.00008644581,0.9613628,0.0000016763804,9.420868e-7,0.0000018898742,0.00031193183,0.0003470521,0.000058177586,0.0018700912,0.035595927,0.000073894815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078010815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016633538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030734222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013872107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009381394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323654667","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109994","title":"Quantifying annual spatial consistency in chick-rearing seabirds to inform important site identification","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"British Antarctic Survey; European Regional Development Fund; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Natural Environment Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Bureau of Ocean Energy Management; Institut écologie et environnement; Darwin Initiative; Horizon 2020; Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, UK Government; Ministry for Primary Industries; BirdLife Australia; Research Executive Agency; Deakin University; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Korea Polar Research Institute; Sight Research UK; Leverhulme Trust; Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Department of Conservation, New Zealand; European Commission; Natural England; Institut Polaire Français Paul Emile Victor; H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; Government of the United Kingdom; MAVA Foundation; National Science Foundation; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique","keywords":"Sampling (signal processing); Population; Seabird; Geography; Tracking (education); Consistency (knowledge bases); Sample (material); Distribution (mathematics); Ecology; Spatial distribution; Identification (biology); Global Positioning System; Sampling design; Species distribution; Statistics; Habitat; Computer science; Biology; Remote sensing; Demography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.061225043005638156,"score_gpt":0.2872878581494832,"score_spread":0.22606281514384505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323654667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941926,0.000004746895,0.00032232256,0.0042189853,0.00020016979,0.0003987324,0.00002043648,0.00017356615,0.00046843433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99734575,0.000014934251,0.00021847321,0.0019075304,0.000033291875,0.00008951023,0.00019067989,0.000006826037,0.00019299073],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850035,0.0000935146,0.0005540537,0.00036728947,0.00018405604,0.00030075578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993957,0.0001677603,0.0001488648,0.00018535116,0.000028358045,0.00007391168],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010148556,0.00013021589,0.00015666657,0.00011009005,0.0002212764,0.000031696487,0.00015306934,0.00018411568,0.00032627612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007681501,0.000117053816,0.00004024547,0.0010484883,0.00010766299,0.00030425112,0.00017105397,0.00014041338,0.0015898428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046710193,0.000026240938,0.9865043,0.000003664799,0.0000029345526,0.0000070499095,0.00033209668,0.0001497049,0.008669038,0.00057577237,0.000890964,0.0027915277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020425851,0.000076784665,0.9912634,0.00001012665,0.0000032959742,0.000002162472,0.00017407429,0.004359605,0.00018624168,0.00047357168,0.0030879185,0.00015854248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015310369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051397835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008482797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013696775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025709614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361291658","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110028","title":"Life-cycle analysis of an endangered migratory goose to assess the impact of conservation actions on population recovery","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Framsenteret; Miljødirektoratet; Norges Forskningsråd; European Commission","keywords":"Endangered species; Population; Culling; Geography; Minimum viable population; Population viability analysis; Goose; Ecology; Population growth; Critically endangered; Habitat; Fishery; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.1280935909909795,"score_gpt":0.35080412195777255,"score_spread":0.22271053096679305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361291658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99884707,0.0000014260354,0.00008794497,0.00057393115,0.00005076074,0.00024960202,0.000080494705,0.00004240304,0.00006639238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99885464,0.0000048816896,0.00012138193,0.00057504687,0.000011484545,0.000033824155,0.00035765173,0.0000037850537,0.000037326517],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989859,0.0002596297,0.00028830173,0.00020894695,0.00012730737,0.0001299075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910873,0.00035957247,0.00020499498,0.00022382413,0.00002838123,0.00007450909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000465859,0.00009150203,0.00019142948,0.00012560836,0.000117931384,0.000007683183,0.00013457134,0.00013435252,0.00055656733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005984801,0.000058762464,0.0001348166,0.001416976,0.00010915518,0.00015021184,0.000043918128,0.00007369965,0.000055985198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011397884,0.00011581772,0.9623218,9.2086367e-7,0.00005531308,4.4254827e-7,0.00007622376,0.009517777,0.025236154,0.00002703195,0.0005754656,0.0019590345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008872952,0.00043778142,0.99419606,0.0000028020054,0.000082018756,2.1080928e-7,0.000113291164,0.004114991,0.00070936646,0.00014545023,0.00003869092,0.00007059661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001787538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017137912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031874232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001067855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021276755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6094022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365505797","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109942","title":"Geographic and taxonomic variation in adaptive capacity among mountain-dwelling small mammals: Implications for conservation status and actions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia; Parks Canada","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Pika; Climate change; Interspecific competition; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Biology; Species distribution; Population; Geography; Habitat; National park","score_opus":0.1806573585992158,"score_gpt":0.2766001784568188,"score_spread":0.09594281985760297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365505797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99458045,0.000017456736,0.0021853554,0.0020648285,0.000037296482,0.00061701506,0.00017113912,0.000085171094,0.00024131202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982346,0.00029100236,0.00042461752,0.00035692542,0.000012289932,0.000330353,0.00032339268,0.000005074897,0.000021717558],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911827,0.00006863982,0.00022325665,0.00031076898,0.000045988087,0.00023308533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993899,0.00031039352,0.000113002316,0.00009017169,0.000028459706,0.000068092566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003673271,0.0001054092,0.00011486858,0.00007119186,0.0002345494,0.00004396609,0.000049289807,0.0001276257,0.00021540251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020530893,0.000099276105,0.000025192849,0.0003889097,0.00022884153,0.00017531103,0.000056207788,0.00007471113,0.000018474399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029814306,0.000022905904,0.9775056,0.000004896885,0.0000045977577,9.766271e-8,0.000080063255,0.00003536609,0.008495099,0.013171681,0.00015730281,0.00049256353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003237772,0.00006496382,0.9869064,0.00000532518,0.000007800028,8.032805e-7,0.0004979502,0.005781606,0.00005339861,0.0037789808,0.002460901,0.00011809588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024722277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005031779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009400787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021161034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007923995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4048362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366259819","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110053","title":"Smaller human populations are still not a necessary condition for biodiversity conservation: A response to Cafaro et al. (2023)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Geography; Conservation status; Population; Nocturnal; Apex predator; Persecution; Biodiversity; Predation; Ecosystem; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.2499659711601985,"score_gpt":0.3601651491358934,"score_spread":0.11019917797569492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366259819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79945993,0.000004440712,0.0015150137,0.19769135,0.0001282744,0.00058626226,0.00023956264,0.00026374432,0.000111398855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86262727,0.0000086418795,0.000848902,0.13407554,0.000018893665,0.00020105012,0.0012564104,0.000007924059,0.0009553668],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979625,0.00051878963,0.00039603328,0.00056834496,0.00022662526,0.0003277302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854064,0.0007097508,0.00022030488,0.00027916252,0.00010978881,0.00014036689],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012450361,0.00020765509,0.00024295058,0.00016482973,0.00067576964,0.00005321535,0.00024733794,0.00020838885,0.0011411826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016785365,0.00019226821,0.00011367074,0.00080936094,0.000248779,0.0002750676,0.00019026098,0.0001607185,0.0011383131],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053944305,0.00006383067,0.48807192,0.000004535218,0.000017249327,0.000006600315,0.0001279114,0.00032766923,0.022727085,0.0010792853,0.4869484,0.00008606421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049714005,0.00017446556,0.7800564,0.000010609295,0.000019754178,0.0000020967898,0.00027214614,0.00073010544,0.00024407136,0.00089790236,0.21688178,0.00021352728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069832953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00111533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2919845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012380167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032931308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367056360","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110041","title":"The changing dynamics of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1: Next steps for management &amp; science in North America","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Influenza Virus Research Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Influenza A virus subtype H5N1; Wildlife; Epizootic; Outbreak; Geography; Context (archaeology); Pandemic; Biosecurity; Wildlife disease; Ebola virus; Archipelago; Highly pathogenic; Biology; Socioeconomics; Ecology; Zoology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Disease; Virus; Virology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine","score_opus":0.17917575838934924,"score_gpt":0.3848711095427129,"score_spread":0.20569535115336368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367056360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962303,0.00013416997,0.00030460666,0.002021735,0.000059727274,0.0009854524,0.000030361965,0.00005727939,0.00017636993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960188,0.0006239621,0.0012284821,0.0014956517,0.000030678882,0.00029095612,0.00009655466,0.000007601217,0.00020731006],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986633,0.000053804735,0.00031190732,0.0002431,0.00028371153,0.00044417972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896145,0.00041075383,0.00010188472,0.0002313924,0.0002459326,0.0000485731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001011372,0.00009811526,0.00018682219,0.00028627118,0.00029979442,0.000024441846,0.00019957837,0.000043576685,0.000003694475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013037935,0.000059946527,0.000055295124,0.002089885,0.0005519219,0.00007303866,0.00022900339,0.00009877125,0.000025208019],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009484913,0.00011102423,0.87254536,0.0002413101,0.000076161006,0.0000142066765,0.0008714126,0.00011182573,0.0138579095,0.0077669327,0.00038449137,0.10307085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065209816,0.00024447803,0.96899617,0.000041856405,0.000011589335,5.5380326e-7,0.0010819276,0.0063998997,0.00007334141,0.00033859586,0.022071976,0.00008749349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048628197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032056792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102983356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016171331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065223394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24445485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376253596","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110084","title":"Functional connectivity of an imperilled Arctic ungulate – where melting sea ice and human trails increase isolation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ecology; Habitat; Landscape connectivity; Threatened species; Metapopulation; Arctic; Disturbance (geology); Climate change; Geography; Biology; Population; Biological dispersal","score_opus":0.05632415244495466,"score_gpt":0.2694772303350172,"score_spread":0.21315307789006255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376253596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99873435,0.000024088358,0.000044646826,0.00027790156,0.0000217375,0.00019216853,0.000007571861,0.000069662645,0.0006278867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994413,0.000029298893,0.0001904761,0.00018890951,0.000026109796,0.000016151344,0.000061198894,0.000004362118,0.000042176554],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911666,0.00016371896,0.00020026314,0.00025786087,0.00012445288,0.00013702914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995215,0.0002020733,0.000111599016,0.0000895358,0.000023204393,0.000052092717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051300373,0.00009618452,0.00015076452,0.000018420475,0.00019441458,0.000012642118,0.000054967077,0.0000702608,0.00082383776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002838255,0.0000773249,0.000030190768,0.00025140477,0.00014358222,0.00017782238,0.00016335111,0.000062345534,0.000029348952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005682331,0.000033090608,0.9590047,0.000019682122,0.000008753766,0.0000012572049,0.000039987004,0.000030112791,0.037738066,0.00053218595,0.00016633212,0.0023690388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002643201,0.0002143199,0.99423283,0.000008871323,0.000008977591,0.000002328307,0.000063274136,0.0035813854,0.00014498085,0.0008379488,0.0005448116,0.00009596654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006431735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036157363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037593085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004985981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004423957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9722903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378223408","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110134","title":"Assessing the effectiveness of potential protected areas and OECMs in conserving biodiversity against subsurface resource extraction impacts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Convention on Biological Diversity; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental planning; Biodiversity conservation; Business; Resource management (computing); Protected area; Environmental science; Ecology; Computer science","score_opus":0.024814548447544552,"score_gpt":0.25043373830804183,"score_spread":0.22561918986049728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378223408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976947,0.000013870026,0.0014763414,0.00027665886,0.000024572088,0.00033531914,0.0000020906166,0.000040846437,0.00013564949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992911,0.000041080053,0.0005160012,0.00010668847,0.0000035323512,0.0000086019,0.000022891172,0.0000028567308,0.000007247671],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894965,0.00042570033,0.00014477808,0.00020616295,0.000121571706,0.00015212626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945325,0.0003156123,0.000098312215,0.000095856914,0.0000040684217,0.00003289801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091739633,0.00009081535,0.0001110626,0.0000083773,0.00013961093,0.00002336076,0.00008827543,0.000102021324,0.000022361723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016618977,0.00006270887,0.000024574516,0.0003189123,0.00030249613,0.00017864945,0.0001623752,0.00011349295,0.0000122796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007620522,0.0000254012,0.83852553,0.000011134677,0.0000035860019,0.0000056683302,0.00004483855,0.0137144765,0.14643131,0.0000055603105,0.000013392169,0.0011428951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023529837,0.000043212913,0.98082197,0.00002351827,0.0000043197406,0.0000032907744,0.0004151113,0.017322453,0.0008621509,0.00012319762,0.00006838027,0.00007710424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075021427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020853895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14556916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104972336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000051881198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25571933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385621311","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110223","title":"Quantifying and overcoming Darwinian shortfalls to conserve the fish tree of life","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fish biology, ecology, and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Clade; Phylogenetic tree; Supertree; Biology; Phylogenetics; Biodiversity; Taxonomic rank; Tree of life (biology); Optimal distinctiveness theory; Prioritization; Evolutionary biology; Ecology; Zoology; Geography; Business; Taxon","score_opus":0.13502632778915324,"score_gpt":0.305493830202224,"score_spread":0.17046750241307074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385621311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903364,0.00000964523,0.000013708899,0.008776387,0.000103669874,0.00027140605,0.000020045294,0.00005440327,0.00041432353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99417955,0.00003065851,0.00023015389,0.005405538,0.000022580021,0.000030227367,0.000022119028,0.000004009002,0.000075175754],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990707,0.00014115179,0.00024886386,0.0002562842,0.00007901121,0.00020397513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992367,0.00045858324,0.000076612676,0.0001449613,0.000011309037,0.00007183418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059934554,0.00009541375,0.00016399713,0.000025508723,0.0001385625,0.0000141996925,0.0001715148,0.00013822246,0.00029359927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063429854,0.000059559527,0.000036789384,0.0002835939,0.00037369388,0.000052292347,0.00022517188,0.00008616579,0.000089513625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029138264,0.000018485134,0.92296964,0.0000027361643,0.0000041069097,0.0000016252834,0.00007793109,0.0000035023163,0.0693087,0.00010845108,0.0055108177,0.0019648396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001348974,0.00017641902,0.99157834,0.0000050469594,0.0000064857204,0.0000018180223,0.00019340792,0.00017985239,0.0004132151,0.0001365719,0.007086797,0.00008714423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031874972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002520139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06889548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020609725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009530104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32147062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385634257","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110173","title":"Opportunities and challenges in Asian bee research and conservation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Distribution (mathematics); Citizen science; Food security; Political science; Geography; Environmental planning; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Biology","score_opus":0.7370289344110709,"score_gpt":0.3376321951891575,"score_spread":0.3993967392219134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385634257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9146754,0.0013368448,3.2130874e-8,0.08296381,0.000009471716,0.00011621399,0.000014999534,0.0000623082,0.00082089024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96989065,0.029606799,0.000009368664,0.00025960847,0.00005197248,0.000026533797,0.000045139575,3.5339133e-7,0.00010959322],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992458,0.00012354089,0.00012664507,0.00021076511,0.000097092525,0.00019615356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992705,0.00059583416,0.000025702384,0.000009591656,0.00005774542,0.00004063648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000714282,0.00007108836,0.00011362955,0.00002834188,0.00019684945,0.000035153946,0.0000538561,0.00009613192,0.00001585911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019144354,0.000027974414,0.000009594605,0.00024525909,0.00018778046,0.000075261785,0.000096787,0.000082553604,0.000009905817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011089557,0.000053206593,0.6584189,0.000030353742,0.000008662815,0.000030761046,0.00029982574,3.3006298e-8,0.10795797,0.040591143,0.002287326,0.19021091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065988075,0.0002329293,0.94790983,0.000018219918,6.314637e-7,0.0000028313077,0.0025966072,0.000044885477,0.000053065352,0.005188069,0.04381728,0.00006966135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024096682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040387353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2894909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000072794446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000033609426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2253709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386174237","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110239","title":"Using culturally transmitted behavior to help delineate conservation units for species at risk","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Foraging; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Cultural transmission in animals; Social learning; Ecology; Cultural diversity; Diversity (politics); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Evolutionary biology; Psychology; Biology; Sociology; Genetics","score_opus":0.1523536837194594,"score_gpt":0.30822742814779885,"score_spread":0.15587374442833946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386174237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889972,0.000026009287,0.00894855,0.0008813438,0.00015919622,0.00054281,0.0003745562,0.000048471655,0.000021855261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901304,0.0000727473,0.003526303,0.0015324618,0.00014219154,0.000039368813,0.0034215054,0.000008590784,0.0011264082],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915564,0.00007762347,0.00020396594,0.000288577,0.000088930734,0.00018526267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999337,0.000033430984,0.000089203684,0.00013017563,0.00034203692,0.00006811022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016700632,0.00012955623,0.00011685263,0.000044967845,0.0002602925,0.000023972034,0.00010703306,0.00021460155,0.00003607594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002967557,0.00010880153,0.00006305155,0.00031382378,0.000046797126,0.000005034085,0.00006416075,0.000042284344,0.00001874912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023550478,0.000010262351,0.2810979,0.000007425415,0.000020126246,9.028072e-7,0.000075171534,0.0004296723,0.7113971,0.00010908957,0.0060332282,0.0005835804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006862485,0.00028936748,0.8000636,0.0000077509,0.00005136803,0.0000046930736,0.00018507287,0.0017916299,0.038632214,0.00011984336,0.15790571,0.00026249595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007177136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014661414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6727649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019411127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030439991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44367975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386350140","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110246","title":"A Canada-wide macro assessment of protected area connectivity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ministry of Environment; University of Guelph","funders":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; Mitacs; Weston Family Foundation","keywords":"Protected area; Indigenous; Geography; Habitat; Population; IUCN protected area categories; Government (linguistics); Biodiversity; Control area; Environmental resource management; Local government area; Environmental protection; Ecology; Local government; Control (management); Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.04356284533556022,"score_gpt":0.2670664524582015,"score_spread":0.22350360712264128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386350140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911486,0.0000014305504,0.00075943454,0.0055999444,0.00009108929,0.00031887475,0.000026582957,0.000075569566,0.0019784598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976976,0.000005351609,0.0005001204,0.0013520283,0.000010778822,0.0000903201,0.00007723371,0.0000039752717,0.00026261117],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990862,0.00010988537,0.00023711717,0.00021826981,0.0001906761,0.00015785689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993268,0.00030797007,0.00013853973,0.00014929284,0.000035166828,0.00004223357],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026784797,0.00009069424,0.00012710025,0.000026152491,0.000102329046,0.000011171233,0.000105498744,0.000067365494,0.0009832924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045557588,0.000071801085,0.00003402749,0.00049979775,0.000080087775,0.000105589366,0.000080706755,0.00009303928,0.000030653347],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018552546,0.000038311762,0.940397,0.0000040652913,0.0000081942235,0.0000029868968,0.000009588317,0.00017230047,0.034767337,0.00037646916,0.023054695,0.0011504579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013195125,0.00007405277,0.960856,0.000008671584,0.0000033447188,0.0000013965133,0.00003349612,0.012079884,0.00091443665,0.00029661783,0.025510347,0.00008976478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3153066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19474743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12055916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020313499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011827502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386384020","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110253","title":"Cattle ranchers' tolerance to jaguar revealed through a spectrum of intended behaviours across a gradient of losses in a gamified survey-based field experiment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Scottish Funding Council; Université de Sherbrooke","keywords":"Jaguar; Wildlife; Aposematism; Livelihood; Context (archaeology); Livestock; Wildlife conservation; Predation; Geography; Environmental resource management; Psychology; Ecology; Predator; Biology; Environmental science; Forestry","score_opus":0.06581552470160963,"score_gpt":0.315008934835251,"score_spread":0.24919341013364138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386384020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958965,0.000014724364,0.00040410025,0.003034813,0.00010178331,0.00042028548,0.000031153988,0.000031440788,0.00006518932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997529,0.000007749504,0.00041166623,0.0018388708,0.0000067791684,0.00009521846,0.000059781523,0.0000044021644,0.00004658203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872404,0.0002186596,0.00040234596,0.00028673263,0.0001284453,0.00023974858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991816,0.00041732108,0.0001511553,0.00019028984,0.000024226722,0.000035350364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006650175,0.000112246955,0.00024586247,0.000033886347,0.000045692042,0.0000046916857,0.00017053905,0.00014154235,0.00021801091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055292185,0.0000967954,0.000050926512,0.00070975284,0.00015745102,0.00006911624,0.000080132435,0.00008606984,0.00003122502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039227054,0.00013382132,0.9849381,0.0000068917448,0.000003899496,0.000002537841,0.0006907267,0.00042947815,0.011933797,0.00007142887,0.0012405525,0.00015649258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053689815,0.00039373548,0.9754917,0.000029007317,0.000002453767,3.6842667e-7,0.00017472313,0.00033240023,0.022573128,0.00028177936,0.00007962491,0.000104192964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048776595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046933168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010639332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007574177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022218208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7373594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386819644","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110240","title":"Additional data confirms the impact of the COVID19 lockdown on the behavior and fattening of migratory snow geese","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada; Canada First Research Excellence Fund; Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; ArcticNet","keywords":"Goose; Snow; Wildlife; Population; Geography; Overgrazing; Arctic; Ecology; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Fishery; Biology; Grazing; Demography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.11050040947262707,"score_gpt":0.3061372544834171,"score_spread":0.19563684501079004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386819644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960826,0.0000056266467,0.0000025376278,0.0013683685,0.000027870672,0.00030680274,0.0021272984,0.000011190291,0.00006769078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988737,0.000006836134,0.000012679259,0.0004676562,0.0000112822245,0.000069105234,0.0004771504,0.0000022262122,0.00007932534],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993104,0.00016759953,0.00015032188,0.00015784852,0.000110937995,0.00010289011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984422,0.0011018048,0.00012360782,0.0003032732,0.000010897138,0.000018257833],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003647906,0.00007019586,0.00008072689,0.000008332524,0.0001776299,0.0000054135535,0.0003673195,0.00008012048,0.0074250726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000494718,0.00002634643,0.000042448184,0.00017521884,0.0008930794,0.000048363534,0.00028105677,0.00011741208,0.000052254964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018014664,0.000041683106,0.92675316,5.389241e-7,0.000005473867,7.739548e-7,0.0000254147,0.000008689925,0.0059196763,0.00005182891,0.06614948,0.0010252586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007414711,0.00010935723,0.9972904,0.000007450075,0.000011184878,0.0000026975401,0.00009342133,0.00015421555,0.00030328298,0.00009427018,0.0018210912,0.000038532886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012125654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000110706984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07053718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021605552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018766177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387199893","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110286","title":"Enabling a National Program for Ecological Corridors in Canada in support of biodiversity conservation, climate change adaptation, and Indigenous leadership","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Dalhousie University","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Biodiversity; Adaptation (eye); Biodiversity conservation; Geography; Environmental resource management; Climate change; Climate change adaptation; Ecology; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.18779101627820244,"score_gpt":0.26210700605494613,"score_spread":0.0743159897767437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387199893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99701875,0.000012241674,0.000003898384,0.0020348376,0.000045920013,0.00073655706,0.00009217969,0.000026993752,0.000028631659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99741995,0.00006732559,0.00015159699,0.0018672494,0.000010255582,0.00017921113,0.00030047202,0.000001934977,0.0000019946444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905956,0.00006215204,0.00027799135,0.00021462572,0.00014204781,0.00024365037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995226,0.00024819557,0.000117332325,0.000041126605,0.000033618922,0.00003712308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059934286,0.00008006425,0.00014948288,0.00006132818,0.000076842065,0.000009953146,0.00008527982,0.00008857323,0.00006956064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013682137,0.0000643477,0.000016485643,0.0004258498,0.0000320156,0.00014071859,0.00005737676,0.000048082402,0.000010598506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053112908,0.00004334718,0.9978327,0.000040687202,0.000002149255,0.0000037965283,0.0004070076,0.00022997709,0.00004718552,0.000023877348,0.00039107967,0.00092504517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004306808,0.0001417974,0.9876954,0.000010587268,0.0000022702745,0.0000010272198,0.00087659486,0.009096216,0.000025308587,0.00019284296,0.0014393406,0.00008792247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29463503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8900322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5953972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020407097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008755627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7100621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387306414","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110219","title":"The power of eDNA sampling to investigate the impact of Australian mega-fires on platypus occupancy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research; Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment","keywords":"Occupancy; Platypus; Fauna; Biodiversity; Monotreme; Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Ecology; Geography; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.08286396799299359,"score_gpt":0.3196802542334222,"score_spread":0.23681628624042864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387306414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997014,0.0000074109666,0.000008278781,0.0021448312,0.00010922943,0.0003757917,0.00002062865,0.00003664926,0.00028316953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960095,0.0000054351526,0.000050116694,0.0001837442,0.000014448515,0.000021780394,0.000007900579,0.0000045575416,0.000111060486],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990469,0.00017151871,0.00025164348,0.00016817669,0.00016653165,0.00019521725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986583,0.0008888015,0.0001371681,0.00024951823,0.000013056785,0.000053171192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000777527,0.00009894654,0.00012981483,0.000019673478,0.00012313676,0.000015082667,0.00026751639,0.000071687704,0.00010024057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009558945,0.00004371744,0.00007332526,0.00044151174,0.0002087925,0.000042711832,0.000094656265,0.000081070364,0.00017078167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015005427,0.000030143157,0.82247645,0.00000584332,0.000023024075,0.0000010834675,0.0002783802,0.0012088795,0.15832044,0.0004336826,0.014520788,0.002551218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007597682,0.00044676717,0.99217457,0.000022672843,0.0000021571573,6.547247e-7,0.000047921694,0.0007378424,0.003728569,0.00056252896,0.0021390629,0.000061280916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018553333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009532163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1696981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006118353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011418562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28047213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387387437","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110313","title":"Conservation after biodiversity: An analysis of Michael E. Soulé's ‘What is Conservation Biology?’","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Normative; Biodiversity; Environmental ethics; Value (mathematics); Intrinsic value (animal ethics); Conservation biology; Dominion; Sociology; Biodiversity conservation; Ecology; Reading (process); Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07465019620160557,"score_gpt":0.27540679281930064,"score_spread":0.20075659661769507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387387437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865007,0.000045210334,0.00023941846,0.012442979,0.00011385078,0.00025053613,0.00016317559,0.000115732284,0.00012841412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98169816,0.0003830986,0.00039668704,0.01601519,0.000020611331,0.000030068006,0.0013898337,0.00000595788,0.000060407496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982604,0.0002557321,0.00042019578,0.00054228527,0.00025186414,0.00026954795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901867,0.00026210758,0.00024062225,0.0003470023,0.000032825163,0.000098791774],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007005474,0.00020097701,0.000311559,0.00017998058,0.0001776438,0.000037101272,0.00023870409,0.00038341398,0.0015686034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010248556,0.00017584648,0.00015960168,0.0014715217,0.0007899974,0.0007158272,0.0002229014,0.0001567005,0.00050914614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011790921,0.0000889316,0.97582114,0.000006569261,0.00009761088,0.0000028885597,0.00042225854,0.000111491296,0.021305677,0.00048048614,0.00090217765,0.00064285635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002533898,0.00020824416,0.9803886,0.000009032845,0.00017032388,5.3924435e-7,0.00045772977,0.00797101,0.0016144303,0.005390348,0.0033038598,0.00023248175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012534433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032798632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019691246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093603194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010431749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388750154","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110349","title":"Visitors to national parks show positive attitudes towards recolonising wolves in the Bohemian Forest Ecosystem","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Interreg; Universität für Bodenkultur Wien","keywords":"Recreation; Visitor pattern; Geography; Wildlife; National park; Canis; Czech; Natura 2000; Residence; Sociocultural evolution; Environmental protection; Socioeconomics; Ecology; Biodiversity; Political science; Archaeology; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.04633979267300937,"score_gpt":0.2841292290071855,"score_spread":0.23778943633417615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388750154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97900355,0.000004283703,0.000076757125,0.0184237,0.00014345568,0.00040423594,0.000014579931,0.000069028116,0.0018604272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99274653,0.000007195318,0.00023504716,0.0065938565,0.000071490074,0.00014884671,0.00010995588,0.0000042479564,0.000082799495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987732,0.00024903938,0.00023647526,0.00028869096,0.00021997283,0.00023262041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928075,0.00048185786,0.00006808329,0.00010201707,0.000026439977,0.0000408699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011318647,0.00010928325,0.00011351819,0.0000559822,0.00024079674,0.000045290915,0.0002350129,0.00015755875,0.00015109073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005847017,0.000075596734,0.000039237657,0.0006777372,0.000075409574,0.00016381785,0.00010048572,0.0001271119,0.00041080956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031274616,0.000035212444,0.9897485,0.0000024147005,0.000004600703,0.00000540004,0.0002285871,0.0004538393,0.00052773394,0.0008237667,0.007345018,0.00079370296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011975099,0.00010992211,0.9933997,0.000016682827,0.0000023182438,0.0000033757794,0.00015671078,0.0011531896,0.00005506903,0.0014402557,0.0034364439,0.0001066289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023186418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036486958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013743031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019812008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031499516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5280263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390122587","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110425","title":"Widespread degradation and limited protection of forests in global tropical dry ecosystems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf forests; Threatened species; Biodiversity; Shrubland; Tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests; Ecosystem; Biome; Agroforestry; Geography; Ecoregion; Ecosystem services; Forest ecology; Tropics; Subtropics; Forest restoration; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.04897544917466697,"score_gpt":0.22986846681653633,"score_spread":0.18089301764186935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390122587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99749124,0.0000100764255,0.0005265574,0.0012050233,0.000055754354,0.00039987575,0.0000074321815,0.00005829457,0.00024572597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959075,0.00002536874,0.00013044472,0.00010154021,0.000010168118,0.000021686737,0.000045236553,0.0000015451724,0.000073265815],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924445,0.000106284824,0.00019941013,0.00020413524,0.00012745516,0.00011827177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973696,0.00005745346,0.00008271269,0.00008073995,0.00001200223,0.000030135583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021510571,0.00007224187,0.000100441015,0.000044365897,0.000069218666,0.000012804769,0.00007013155,0.0000944656,0.000048403974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017315356,0.000057854464,0.000022941385,0.0005335625,0.00010353227,0.00007983211,0.000120403725,0.0000416073,0.000038203285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046792753,0.000027583963,0.9922234,0.000012046507,0.0000031548889,0.0000014334435,0.00003707603,0.000056726974,0.0017431015,0.000097291566,0.00012926759,0.005622124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002912273,0.00010011662,0.98471355,0.000014321771,0.000003880544,5.9505703e-7,0.00009547629,0.011880898,0.000107040025,0.0005779919,0.0021482343,0.00006664645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017584861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038792763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011824171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000938964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000045073684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26583168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391830674","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110489","title":"Temporal dynamics in gray wolf space use suggest stabilizing range in the Great Lakes region, USA","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Michigan State University","keywords":"Ecology; Gray wolf; Habitat; Disturbance (geology); Canis; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Population; Species distribution; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.051644497061506846,"score_gpt":0.25152650126415094,"score_spread":0.1998820042026441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391830674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.983522,0.000053694548,0.00018704118,0.01523892,0.00011921076,0.00033664296,0.0000051467273,0.000048135847,0.00048919424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970812,0.000048163718,0.00016693605,0.0022723551,0.000025305539,0.00006727249,0.00007048058,0.000005207732,0.00026304915],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872166,0.0003642252,0.00025635786,0.00032550545,0.00011614304,0.00021613836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990823,0.00067290134,0.000048416077,0.00016340909,0.000008222704,0.000024710062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075300015,0.00012539302,0.00012415176,0.000052671097,0.00008585059,0.00006940286,0.00017534164,0.00018828151,0.00020376341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036355507,0.00008077399,0.000037936992,0.00060169946,0.00023515003,0.00038472234,0.000055764074,0.0002376107,0.0001031675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033811455,0.000037346792,0.99321127,0.0000049263126,0.0000017147815,0.000045360364,0.00019693255,0.000032226395,0.000070889575,0.004162392,0.0016877443,0.00051537156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014862439,0.00006598085,0.9830214,0.000023599508,0.0000033451943,0.00001081986,0.0002294792,0.0069523086,0.0000035560033,0.001970788,0.0074572447,0.00011284955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026078483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060852192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058244348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027248755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018668376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9562848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393975461","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110566","title":"Overcome imposter syndrome: Contribute to working groups and build strong networks","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Hakai Institute; Tula Foundation; Mitacs; Pew Charitable Trusts; Smithsonian Institution","keywords":"Constructive; Diversity (politics); Process (computing); Feeling; Psychology; Knowledge management; Creativity; Natural (archaeology); Sustainability; Group cohesiveness; Personality; Facilitation; Public relations; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.047105631057626184,"score_gpt":0.31065656978703776,"score_spread":0.2635509387294116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393975461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9696809,0.0040153125,0.018592099,0.004909035,0.0011315562,0.00043853614,0.00001514538,0.0003220533,0.0008953793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969971,0.00010478962,0.0002014582,0.0016763939,0.00023603046,0.00013176992,0.000049067647,0.0000128010115,0.0005905732],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987381,0.00013377506,0.00026810952,0.00045844913,0.00009131543,0.00031023446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921876,0.00044932,0.000047368067,0.0001281604,0.000081977654,0.000074390045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042437695,0.00016903765,0.00020505147,0.00007932031,0.00021590617,0.00012860999,0.00008396947,0.00020071528,0.00012627924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001669232,0.00013579732,0.00005771342,0.00036735105,0.000089000896,0.00010194228,0.000097550976,0.00020881246,0.00007712251],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018772375,0.00007414486,0.9223059,0.000034416655,0.00029893714,0.00006664116,0.00059385796,0.000034946686,0.0008574956,0.03945932,0.01477037,0.02131624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028059084,0.00032372773,0.96044475,0.00007846787,0.00002783051,0.00011703312,0.0001407604,0.00082001917,0.000008947827,0.00078263093,0.036769696,0.00020554695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006544638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050184284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03867669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076183984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011713823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5537654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396841174","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110611","title":"Restoring ecological function: Interactions between vertebrates and latrines in a reintroduced population of Rhinoceros unicornis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rhinoceros; Ecology; Population; Biology; Geography; Zoology","score_opus":0.03798993717560418,"score_gpt":0.2614035809418673,"score_spread":0.2234136437662631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396841174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967219,0.00006306401,0.00016051192,0.0023707545,0.00020348941,0.00016323902,0.0000031246288,0.00006783523,0.00024606736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992851,0.000029065159,0.00021268787,0.00020567421,0.000076639146,0.000025538235,0.000058353857,0.0000037593077,0.000103165556],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909765,0.00012950266,0.0002983267,0.0002826305,0.00007465541,0.000117210206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940294,0.00040237512,0.00006254403,0.0000910929,0.00001166175,0.000029394289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036120045,0.00009010463,0.00014386319,0.00006174074,0.00007426629,0.000019619329,0.000057916615,0.00013341566,0.00039916355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002881808,0.00007191097,0.000028353827,0.0003402357,0.000099346355,0.00025912837,0.0000712473,0.000149632,0.00003608144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003755516,0.000022858696,0.99194795,0.000008216083,0.000006975013,0.0000016010562,0.00003801071,0.000030696483,0.0035061585,0.0011980564,0.00027388963,0.0029280446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012306958,0.00015057536,0.99206376,0.000019728199,0.000011943742,0.0000027047925,0.000025755462,0.0021765241,0.000095086005,0.0039139222,0.0013370047,0.00007991374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046372577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039227994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034110725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008710128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008707809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4370561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399113897","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110644","title":"Faunal representation: Exploring the intersection of conservation, national identity, and iconography in Uruguay","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Animal and Plant Science Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Iconography; Representation (politics); Identity (music); Intersection (aeronautics); Geography; Nature Conservation; Archaeology; Environmental ethics; History; Ecology; Political science; Art; Cartography; Aesthetics; Biology; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.3106691448924205,"score_gpt":0.4008601546566866,"score_spread":0.09019100976426614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399113897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99180615,0.00039357136,0.001174384,0.0040232977,0.0008113533,0.00015638865,0.00000944292,0.000035260382,0.001590136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910486,0.000055500946,0.00008216471,0.00044137728,0.00010368952,0.00007921282,0.000042785297,0.0000023676175,0.000088062116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991369,0.00014229123,0.0002698877,0.00022313956,0.00013643026,0.000091319074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925804,0.00049914484,0.00006529677,0.00006307964,0.00009544388,0.000019015159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006921295,0.000065808905,0.00007952423,0.00012456586,0.00007656246,0.00005310246,0.000083492385,0.000055904107,0.0001733359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001784309,0.000044610417,0.000033243057,0.0006444009,0.00016646393,0.0004431089,0.00002446217,0.00010751276,0.00002175308],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060296,0.0000371618,0.68198204,0.000011461318,0.000016118378,0.0000016431678,0.0017450288,0.0000041084922,0.002504773,0.30773422,0.0023336087,0.003569553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091696886,0.00006588678,0.97689766,0.000029258648,0.000004186526,0.000016342747,0.0017940194,0.00071894366,0.00008913874,0.017718967,0.0025176795,0.00005619635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011653178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002495484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29491568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027116512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030524545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18979065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399459147","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110672","title":"Differential impact of clearcut and insect outbreak on boreal lichens and bryophytes 50 years after disturbance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Lichen and fungal ecology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université Laval; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts","funders":"","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Lichen; Boreal; Ecology; Taiga; Biology; Geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.02808141509373242,"score_gpt":0.24249312310704135,"score_spread":0.21441170801330894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399459147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985335,0.0003997534,0.0000015186631,0.00060971215,0.00007494504,0.00011162584,0.00009463426,0.000041714284,0.0001326266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993551,0.00014705498,0.000015117156,0.00024822436,0.00013080252,0.000012085272,0.000051521194,7.387209e-7,0.00003940621],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993689,0.00006734344,0.00013528662,0.00023612219,0.000056231183,0.00013611169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953496,0.00033153465,0.00003120415,0.000028266719,0.000019931438,0.000054092885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007080194,0.00010021717,0.00014965454,0.000011232939,0.00003662433,0.00004213265,0.000049853985,0.00013534247,0.00015994102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005831253,0.000034663113,0.000060783645,0.00009993379,0.00014374068,0.00005150021,0.0000521972,0.00010007665,0.0000064044675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003103665,0.00006155684,0.8764673,0.00001212957,0.000029704122,0.000007533854,0.00008510103,9.3258315e-8,0.09155174,0.0010953186,0.00033251013,0.030046623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007082147,0.0010737738,0.9968755,0.000016550757,0.0000067131405,0.000004388551,0.000012607694,0.00009996679,0.00017797081,0.0005718211,0.0010067035,0.00008316349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004801501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012249935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1204082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013635176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005569938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1751242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399474264","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110671","title":"A framework for ecological restoration cost accounting across context and scale","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Context (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geography; Accounting; Environmental science; Business; Biology; Cartography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.060102370373236874,"score_gpt":0.312032789780899,"score_spread":0.25193041940766214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399474264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95180446,0.000103779945,0.037444428,0.009095022,0.00017931966,0.0007713859,0.000019812303,0.00014076475,0.00044102807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982812,0.00006308863,0.0075135375,0.008934908,0.000052360876,0.00024663215,0.000060461614,0.000007784745,0.00030924662],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990491,0.000051298157,0.00021101248,0.00037369964,0.00010926882,0.00020561201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942887,0.00036118465,0.000050104692,0.00009918201,0.0000066475654,0.000054036504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049094117,0.000115900504,0.00010758468,0.000013472306,0.0002210094,0.0001363403,0.000085539,0.00015221717,0.000484931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022776955,0.00008957463,0.00004110364,0.00013597537,0.00022671316,0.00023874227,0.00015407498,0.0001028868,0.00015528964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021486057,0.00021659101,0.6652273,0.00008625921,0.000034749733,0.0000099160325,0.0008473251,0.00006463201,0.019050807,0.09293907,0.031863775,0.18944475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021095481,0.00016374335,0.5791561,0.000027779754,0.000009163936,0.0000029204868,0.00037844785,0.006289673,0.00025780092,0.0123625165,0.40095612,0.0001847789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000075131975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023556632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36909235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011706692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000040539812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53096545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399697506","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110677","title":"Grey wolves (Canis lupus) shift selection of anthropogenic landscape features following predator control in the Nearctic boreal forest","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Taiga; Canis; Nearctic ecozone; Ecology; Predator; Selection (genetic algorithm); Geography; Boreal; Systemic lupus erythematosus; Predation; Biology","score_opus":0.015041777478319543,"score_gpt":0.24422170137334234,"score_spread":0.22917992389502279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399697506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943728,0.00014575364,0.00030909572,0.0040682848,0.00023825913,0.00034798548,0.0000069741473,0.00005337502,0.00045749883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830496,0.000023785204,0.00009643825,0.0013720371,0.00004931268,0.000061189414,0.00004867564,0.0000051042216,0.000038516668],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989273,0.00025279153,0.00023705821,0.0002543701,0.00014552729,0.00018293419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993482,0.000456171,0.000060744685,0.00010268858,0.00000887417,0.000023319028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005975567,0.00011013949,0.00013836993,0.000037747646,0.00012145458,0.000041945845,0.00015589177,0.00017140423,0.00024566587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020856412,0.0000691818,0.00008200927,0.00041265087,0.00016085821,0.0002256979,0.000030465442,0.00017579565,0.00003186344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006695372,0.000041884858,0.9948873,0.000007237322,0.000017382092,0.0000041727358,0.00018190072,0.00004755719,0.0008789864,0.0010803081,0.002153181,0.0006331151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002736472,0.00019557653,0.9923672,0.000016937698,0.00002238191,0.000008120007,0.00010410064,0.0035695648,0.00004859779,0.0022610985,0.0010482442,0.00008450805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008843214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048177955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039334744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005189247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027446918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2821152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400601699","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110708","title":"‘Participatory’ conservation research involving indigenous peoples and local communities: Fourteen principles for good practice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Citizen journalism; Participatory action research; Geography; Environmental planning; Community-based participatory research; Sociology; Environmental resource management; Environmental ethics; Political science; Ecology; Anthropology; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.5766659572305971,"score_gpt":0.3858297535644195,"score_spread":0.1908362036661776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400601699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792664,0.0027547304,0.0011491717,0.008877435,0.00030725458,0.001202558,0.000057142868,0.00029384997,0.006091465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945587,0.00050981774,0.0005132559,0.0014309781,0.00037102244,0.0003408016,0.0004202159,0.000015928694,0.0018392964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984744,0.00043591775,0.00035277638,0.00024453353,0.00018922827,0.00030310976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99560106,0.0035920537,0.00008009,0.0001579673,0.000517858,0.00005099066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020666674,0.00014918284,0.00016155979,0.00011920915,0.0009046914,0.00069422193,0.0001590425,0.00010904545,0.00019055708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077180564,0.00011318309,0.00004816041,0.000119614466,0.0004763849,0.0008693556,0.00013588225,0.00023109953,0.00002453189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013990392,0.00006280924,0.0055818963,0.00035728497,0.00006983257,0.0000036997242,0.055186402,0.000004937096,0.00023254578,0.9280902,0.0049267174,0.005343775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027514534,0.00050548493,0.00942374,0.00017838791,0.000047548616,0.0000027278322,0.08671037,0.014728378,0.000044787485,0.011677532,0.8761609,0.00024496598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003729662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013336999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91641265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007359054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006792246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7442359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401604783","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110754","title":"Predicting the effects of land cover change on biodiversity in Prairie Canada using species distribution models","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Land cover; Geography; Distribution (mathematics); Cover (algebra); Ecology; Physical geography; Land use; Environmental science; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09578057621441878,"score_gpt":0.24067649001421393,"score_spread":0.14489591379979516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401604783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973994,0.00007243028,0.000079021826,0.001351072,0.00016377961,0.00021137422,0.00030209243,0.000018700259,0.0004021622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992798,0.000036508303,0.0000021158685,0.0004475799,0.000016607528,0.000008130832,0.00019059809,0.0000010817073,0.000017572349],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945444,0.00005758505,0.00010006013,0.0001372716,0.00013770309,0.00011292071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996753,0.00019813106,0.000036588735,0.00006205721,0.0000075047483,0.00002042159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013037655,0.000063881234,0.000069872105,0.000007890504,0.00007338507,0.000015213352,0.000069336995,0.000050802,0.00054192264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000116829586,0.000040092033,0.000021463045,0.00020260259,0.00010294935,0.00009230019,0.00006177328,0.00006796669,0.000015182045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031057065,0.000026281208,0.98936313,0.000031415606,0.0000049416826,0.0000087441185,0.00009850592,0.00017390698,0.0028735662,0.0013521375,0.005878827,0.00015748375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010666994,0.00005848289,0.9784445,0.00003609688,0.000005623644,8.714268e-7,0.00011879823,0.012379064,0.0007208434,0.00008129391,0.0079865875,0.000061180814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1732254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.100508615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07271678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069866027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019086756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91590476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401687964","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110757","title":"Nature's value and biodiversity ethics in a changing world: Insights from a special issue and questions for the future","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Environmental ethics; Value (mathematics); Geography; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biology; Philosophy; Environmental science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03754501640079848,"score_gpt":0.2726880062546204,"score_spread":0.23514298985382193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401687964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93040997,0.001947908,0.00020292013,0.066064954,0.00039508066,0.0003110081,0.000053329688,0.000030133397,0.0005846797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99144244,0.00077104237,0.00072449306,0.0061072824,0.00081149774,0.000016364227,0.000039274033,0.0000024777114,0.00008511336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944866,0.000077427896,0.000077837525,0.00022572381,0.00007949694,0.000090844944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916327,0.0007315309,0.000016917578,0.000058408183,0.0000021660796,0.000027728232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025129426,0.00007533438,0.000063519,0.00004876564,0.00025311828,0.000039268692,0.0000614149,0.00024533772,0.00010539616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000776844,0.00004756663,0.000018753999,0.00027003823,0.00029107826,0.00010613932,0.00012248952,0.00046843928,0.00001936327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004160253,0.00020280803,0.42853215,0.00011063949,0.00008235667,0.00004623194,0.017977934,0.00018995923,0.012805146,0.49360162,0.014220504,0.031814612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018833527,0.00006364333,0.47436857,0.000038362625,0.000018615287,0.0000015718621,0.0004693209,0.0025403602,0.00011802965,0.096191525,0.42585507,0.00014658232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015414895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000738526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41163456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044260236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000041570916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20351616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401863001","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110756","title":"Limited cougar recolonization of eastern North America predicted by an individual-based model","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.037528373587979016,"score_gpt":0.23658786117567362,"score_spread":0.1990594875876946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401863001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9735822,0.000022575168,0.024057975,0.0014650341,0.00007678688,0.00025041937,0.00015727685,0.00016412177,0.00022362161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993254,0.0000151392605,0.0013035474,0.0028439388,0.000016640906,0.00004657099,0.0023691363,0.000008093487,0.00014295522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892396,0.000156231,0.00028693417,0.00031781188,0.00016209146,0.00015294968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951124,0.00014601136,0.00010891645,0.00014451753,0.000031482963,0.00005782062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001915052,0.00011771319,0.00012875513,0.000039209393,0.00008128285,0.000024191417,0.00015849476,0.00017926074,0.00058677065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015332166,0.00009812073,0.000033486303,0.00046896163,0.00021966182,0.0002562219,0.000044089473,0.00010798621,0.00006147655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005997071,0.00012640329,0.9792758,0.000008397754,0.000011946866,0.0000011516249,0.00010020062,0.0064200377,0.0017282874,0.000044355547,0.008916319,0.0033071234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115169656,0.00024296626,0.5151375,0.00000711477,0.000013547994,2.9008555e-7,0.000009564515,0.48145837,0.000108779226,0.00017969706,0.0026443885,0.00008261548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009389233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016609379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47503832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005450947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040850642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64247274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401873118","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110717","title":"A framework for optimising opportunistic collaborative syntheses to propel ecological conservation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"ConocoPhillips; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; Fondation Bertarelli; Smithsonian Institution","keywords":"Nature Conservation; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geography; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.11755047920087384,"score_gpt":0.3267026012296364,"score_spread":0.20915212202876254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401873118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9275656,0.000050794642,0.051717155,0.016564572,0.00038547622,0.0014326071,0.000119000855,0.00023371675,0.0019311109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9577278,0.000024549854,0.032990687,0.008562228,0.00006699237,0.00025311796,0.00016971504,0.000009867644,0.00019503424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986962,0.00031857,0.00026949856,0.0003828679,0.00006434226,0.0002685067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687845,0.0027550429,0.000060961105,0.00016921232,0.000045148972,0.00009120699],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055544346,0.0001583828,0.00021328054,0.000035609482,0.00031583177,0.000063937965,0.00021786761,0.00030854697,0.0027353086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027632318,0.00011757314,0.000057064102,0.00038674046,0.00028786628,0.000114898496,0.0001694035,0.0002097776,0.0003495814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017535442,0.00086851406,0.034535643,0.0001576833,0.00016288343,0.00005231291,0.001817783,0.00091060577,0.2811004,0.48145568,0.17412223,0.023062723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034269143,0.0036379076,0.14535391,0.0002663378,0.000075519994,0.000025286776,0.000533645,0.015158661,0.0020109843,0.17764081,0.65395707,0.0009971475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000059946557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014597621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47983485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012293705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006307659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99817634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401878050","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110763","title":"Integrating high-resolution remote sensing and empirical wildlife detection data for climate-resilient corridors across tropical elevational gradients","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Bobolink Foundation; BAND foundation; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation","keywords":"Wildlife; Remote sensing; Geography; Environmental science; Tropical forest; Tropics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.07407801459690552,"score_gpt":0.3283241812439786,"score_spread":0.2542461666470731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401878050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8227009,0.000036212976,0.17304118,0.0030659812,0.00049318216,0.0003643072,0.00012692982,0.00013888329,0.000032405307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842671,0.000040440464,0.012806302,0.0019007366,0.00019748783,0.0000108459,0.0007161081,0.000014030323,0.000046925594],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816054,0.0001319952,0.00044891614,0.0007080598,0.0002174585,0.00033303513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901134,0.00046957665,0.00011241403,0.00027438797,0.000046697394,0.00008558222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052319356,0.00018816753,0.00016834069,0.000043924127,0.00047636763,0.00018376831,0.00015630129,0.00018734486,0.00006276017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008102666,0.0001496754,0.000054253178,0.00030798424,0.00020238779,0.00053047424,0.00025676232,0.00020941733,0.00004598261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009647146,0.00017127358,0.31432316,0.0001189332,0.00008708014,0.000013023833,0.00042867378,0.0005056803,0.047000594,0.0016504729,0.02199149,0.6127449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021766475,0.0001607904,0.38646135,0.000047167017,0.000016318865,0.000023811548,0.00009979342,0.5801345,0.00015055444,0.0010487293,0.03148023,0.00015906658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009533779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074629637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61258584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023166508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021183876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6103586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402119273","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110771","title":"Coral reef recovery in a remote and large marine protected area is resilient to cascading trophic interactions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fondation Bertarelli; California State University; Women Divers Hall of Fame","keywords":"Marine protected area; Coral reef; Trophic level; Coral bleaching; Coral reef protection; Marine reserve; Fishery; Reef; Oceanography; Environmental issues with coral reefs; Resilience of coral reefs; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Geology; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Habitat","score_opus":0.03921865800363596,"score_gpt":0.26193619541259205,"score_spread":0.22271753740895608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402119273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99267024,0.000037945443,0.00027764228,0.005313087,0.00014224302,0.00039171308,0.000011341437,0.00006205148,0.0010937507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972859,0.00005086877,0.0006062133,0.0006398082,0.00002591997,0.000039284332,0.0000125259885,0.0000037684263,0.0013357096],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924695,0.00005333636,0.00018304963,0.00029451228,0.00006566534,0.00015651078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997642,0.000081653125,0.000025011153,0.000078421675,0.000008233724,0.000042464388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018934334,0.00008952914,0.000115147326,0.000049859886,0.00007711262,0.00003266327,0.00004569378,0.000044992707,0.000419002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020124386,0.00006427482,0.00002486707,0.0003255292,0.000027253413,0.000101685946,0.00033169004,0.00011038831,0.00009720802],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032230647,0.000083743435,0.86241364,0.000054378237,0.000021525959,0.000066007524,0.00044904958,0.0000061993637,0.031801578,0.00036588215,0.012838985,0.091576666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001079694,0.00022473146,0.9219729,0.000076750075,0.0000039512415,0.000015056182,0.000048053927,0.0076703443,0.00010374098,0.0015071818,0.06814829,0.00012106956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016457248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036462885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0914556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013621298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004751357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45877782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402159445","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110770","title":"Improving restoration outcomes of boreal Sphagnum-dominated peatlands after peat-extraction: The key role of phosphorus fertilization","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Sphagnum Peat Moss Association","keywords":"Peat; Sphagnum; Boreal; Phosphorus; Environmental science; Human fertilization; Key (lock); Ecology; Biology; Agronomy; Chemistry","score_opus":0.01495943692749937,"score_gpt":0.24402863562125673,"score_spread":0.22906919869375736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402159445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996597,0.00032683846,0.0008635701,0.00071863795,0.00012779591,0.00019644394,0.000013760842,0.000038873863,0.0011171058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992136,0.00007481593,0.00021432606,0.00014260857,0.0000221431,0.000038472066,0.00015510344,0.00000510926,0.00013385323],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912095,0.00009180007,0.00031597464,0.00020739573,0.00013670974,0.00012718937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995081,0.00018286335,0.00012110705,0.00013390373,0.000028125884,0.000025944686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032848754,0.00010316829,0.0001598912,0.000028516473,0.00006500027,0.000020589883,0.00010187081,0.00012871673,0.0002991251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014035752,0.000058704372,0.00006278392,0.00022909141,0.0001514292,0.00015644007,0.0000593979,0.00008709115,0.000013374249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016431235,0.000052913845,0.973172,0.000007902978,0.00001268168,0.0000024804544,0.00017504595,0.000019562513,0.01701675,0.00037147623,0.00026547952,0.008739413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018934016,0.00018577224,0.9821575,0.000007728144,0.000021295107,0.0000034169568,0.00006313073,0.009337553,0.0025548204,0.0004495531,0.004956346,0.00007353398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082118483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019987952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01446193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055498305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015884974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.327521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403927127","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110828","title":"Conserving genetic diversity hotspots under climate change: Are protected areas helpful?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca; European Commission","keywords":"Climate change; Geography; Genetic diversity; Diversity (politics); Ecology; Biology; Population; Political science","score_opus":0.12543228910919407,"score_gpt":0.26894884809251735,"score_spread":0.14351655898332327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403927127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992065,0.00021879973,0.0001802214,0.004906407,0.00019241929,0.00041834157,0.00010575583,0.0003167455,0.0015962981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996819,0.00022391876,0.00007274695,0.002599744,0.000049148537,0.00007465137,0.0000850009,0.0000067479373,0.00006900492],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890727,0.000091931346,0.0001592415,0.00036920534,0.00018133548,0.00029103522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961877,0.000068776295,0.000060243903,0.00014382617,0.000021864786,0.0000865095],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017290463,0.00014323431,0.00012432151,0.000026498838,0.00031805996,0.00007311061,0.00016444694,0.00014721569,0.018604163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076626166,0.000111762965,0.00006201569,0.00036882298,0.00018085969,0.00014346249,0.00052919134,0.00011734823,0.0015406996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052206193,0.00006966984,0.9811184,0.00004162397,0.000012636081,0.000042435335,0.00013808168,0.00000351243,0.009388899,0.0019796758,0.004211172,0.0029417055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012633673,0.000054778084,0.99171966,0.000034099,0.000010377674,0.000009904358,0.00037302382,0.00057918276,0.00014992362,0.0005269724,0.0062501533,0.00016559189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003707702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002628343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017063463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003033263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004981538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403929952","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110836","title":"Reply to Thornton and Murray: Models for Canada lynx conservation planning require nuance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental ethics; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05506701205311367,"score_gpt":0.26772634783174576,"score_spread":0.21265933577863208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403929952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94004595,0.00016416263,0.01885169,0.0392561,0.0002950091,0.0005741007,0.00003179761,0.00011618961,0.00066501845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9543061,0.000016858008,0.0032235258,0.041397292,0.00007535783,0.0002044306,0.00009054371,0.000010432409,0.00067542546],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988126,0.00006818443,0.00027496772,0.0004780535,0.00012673279,0.00023942612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992646,0.0004203224,0.00005999022,0.00013804944,0.00002928095,0.00008777263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004544776,0.00014332707,0.00014513018,0.000027256912,0.00022209123,0.000051554416,0.00010836923,0.00013007311,0.00009279552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033567165,0.00012178444,0.000026695561,0.00024121701,0.000094680625,0.0004058113,0.00007219188,0.0000970905,0.000016914984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028557365,0.00002986945,0.7447208,0.00006166662,0.000028095774,0.000017558441,0.000374491,0.0021161516,0.0050843228,0.01823154,0.21972522,0.009324705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019845706,0.00021057851,0.6170969,0.000061059276,0.0000129597665,0.000009917283,0.000093652285,0.0898763,0.00019308747,0.013966105,0.27800533,0.00027568266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04915125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03182934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12762392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019762282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009853196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9858373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403992017","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110838","title":"Connectivity conservation to mitigate climate and land-cover change impacts on Borneo","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia","funders":"Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Climate change; Land cover; Cover (algebra); Geography; Environmental resource management; Land use; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.05513088799399459,"score_gpt":0.28132066461057126,"score_spread":0.22618977661657666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403992017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771692,0.000052904437,0.00021693543,0.019940998,0.00026346475,0.00049721455,0.000051463543,0.00017970419,0.0016280895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98281264,0.000096834665,0.00017938185,0.016456489,0.00010727473,0.00013158638,0.00007418905,0.000011411149,0.00013017452],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987624,0.000115275565,0.00023423707,0.00046225134,0.00015979384,0.00026599158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993111,0.000323027,0.00005865785,0.00016035709,0.000023050121,0.00012381152],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040297775,0.00017833446,0.0001507174,0.000064905034,0.00017057442,0.00014401856,0.00008004514,0.00013245226,0.00067697925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025817216,0.00013692165,0.000046990248,0.00035037502,0.00009319788,0.0004817952,0.00009794031,0.00014528589,0.0010723762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025420813,0.000099637735,0.9331638,0.000033177676,0.000022258593,0.000017047187,0.0002779882,0.000043063934,0.0235097,0.0035122326,0.017682463,0.021384398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015781446,0.0003533531,0.90717906,0.00008358109,0.000009826486,0.000011291933,0.000016361724,0.0074485517,0.0007017716,0.00058176136,0.08325864,0.00019801433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013442927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034771572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06557618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013803093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011696885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404522514","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110879","title":"Risk avoidance during dispersal: Temporal and behavioral shifts in selection by non-resident eastern wolves (Canis c.f. lycaon)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Canis; Ecology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Biology; Zoology; Geography; Demography; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.01760797596539353,"score_gpt":0.25006294564427994,"score_spread":0.2324549696788864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404522514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99769306,0.000105772924,0.00027842828,0.0013966875,0.000110712004,0.00024212875,0.000010712891,0.0000971651,0.00006534811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905556,0.00007776413,0.0001550621,0.00028080866,0.0000334168,0.00006059664,0.000035314217,0.00000818523,0.0002933058],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988966,0.00013116539,0.00024318998,0.0004114647,0.000106262334,0.00021133138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997136,0.00008563412,0.00006618672,0.000074633615,0.000006335237,0.00005362783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028380987,0.00013798679,0.00012403603,0.00003896191,0.00014935172,0.000060939325,0.00008173825,0.00017436585,0.00027278022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055013883,0.00011651481,0.000029560748,0.00025255446,0.00016579831,0.00035889688,0.00007720758,0.00021046177,0.00009071555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004730831,0.000048361926,0.986637,0.00000680243,0.0000041312264,0.0000051025727,0.00019246619,0.000015591457,0.011380397,0.00004466055,0.0007236347,0.0008945449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021078708,0.00012924285,0.99204606,0.000023518392,0.000008756644,0.00000265353,0.00007560622,0.006030755,0.00038129798,0.00030016323,0.0006412428,0.00014989107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044198316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048640417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010999098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014479873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001204842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6681493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404557633","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110877","title":"Historic range modeling – A necessary and robust step in Canada lynx recovery planning","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Range (aeronautics); Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0468024891710121,"score_gpt":0.2172406414057048,"score_spread":0.1704381522346927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404557633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99447316,0.00064921944,0.0019059124,0.0018698354,0.00023717275,0.00011684344,0.0000032830105,0.000036540052,0.0007080506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997412,0.00005944699,0.0005074201,0.0018468717,0.000027930797,0.000025311245,0.00002050947,0.000004091715,0.00009641951],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992558,0.000073732066,0.00018244736,0.00025894004,0.000078894256,0.00015020707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997036,0.00016909215,0.000026752687,0.000061175015,0.000004467276,0.000034907258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024867916,0.00008508056,0.000099543155,0.000028679704,0.00007001345,0.000017395854,0.00006355666,0.000093158866,0.00018146845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008662673,0.00007184681,0.000013480097,0.00019836382,0.00003619259,0.00019538363,0.00005193718,0.00012978181,0.000014818251],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030660984,0.0000063935886,0.98385584,0.0000074352247,0.0000030870758,0.00002718817,0.000039804614,0.009778662,0.00010193965,0.000080700825,0.0029936137,0.0030746872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009040509,0.00002778584,0.70374036,0.00002217965,0.000003134839,0.0000047036638,0.000060848422,0.29355374,0.0000013586791,0.00043311284,0.0019716353,0.00009077197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42981064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44525865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28377506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057373074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009927723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5739863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404655522","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110867","title":"Spatial distribution of tree-related microhabitats in European beech-dominated forests","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Beech; Geography; Spatial distribution; Distribution (mathematics); Tree (set theory); Ecology; Forestry; Biology; Remote sensing; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027244137885296792,"score_gpt":0.21522904189902042,"score_spread":0.18798490401372364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404655522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996729,0.00022779369,0.0000084997155,0.002277527,0.00013015507,0.0001566973,0.0001106199,0.00007343137,0.0002862527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989775,0.000046224766,0.00001062413,0.00007550709,0.000028393417,0.0000036942413,0.0008048597,3.4877118e-7,0.00005285394],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991648,0.00017754395,0.00023551175,0.00021352665,0.000057453868,0.00015116415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996255,0.00023488037,0.000044582925,0.000022916016,0.000048633,0.000023485887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033382507,0.00009191408,0.00013871767,0.000014343813,0.00008008526,0.000013956203,0.000106891865,0.00013104129,0.000086956206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016603303,0.00003553387,0.000066094486,0.0003403929,0.00017457882,0.000060349623,0.00006958168,0.00010341253,0.000059189984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103117025,0.00009641744,0.9002986,0.00001142133,0.000020436439,0.000033099226,0.00005506525,0.0000013044728,0.061240196,0.0010908562,0.0012347446,0.03581472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012937299,0.00032333902,0.99512565,0.000030018486,0.0000069900507,0.0000025499924,0.000054005217,0.00024672245,0.00079408166,0.0006969597,0.00250514,0.000085154345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047103094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033328997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09482705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027970502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000048010284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18598363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404733155","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110847","title":"Managing multiple threats: Evaluating the efficacy of broad-scale introduced predator management in improving native mammal resilience to fire","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Predator; Resilience (materials science); Mammal; Marine mammal; Scale (ratio); Geography; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Predation; Cartography","score_opus":0.03735855866775432,"score_gpt":0.29724359736166583,"score_spread":0.2598850386939115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404733155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992247,0.00007221938,0.0011595737,0.0050731977,0.00014151064,0.0007729223,0.00000368195,0.000053822507,0.0004760681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964453,0.00001722789,0.0022695067,0.0008656874,0.000035052326,0.00013003826,0.000013088923,0.000005369719,0.00021871382],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864966,0.0002123235,0.00031828246,0.00043191135,0.00018048008,0.00020733842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990329,0.0006503991,0.00007366022,0.00019641168,0.000015719552,0.000030902233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010339012,0.00011337881,0.00011962955,0.000042213618,0.00012885129,0.000028469029,0.0002448958,0.000077268654,0.00014593055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005231353,0.000077258774,0.00003641287,0.0005554502,0.00015229048,0.00017224633,0.00025848672,0.0001393847,0.00006514094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026557042,0.000075408294,0.79468954,0.000028646095,0.000016604716,0.0000062422046,0.0007773531,0.002644528,0.019245552,0.0006204507,0.00042294463,0.18120718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023512231,0.00020259806,0.91999775,0.00004483877,0.000010579211,0.0000011731047,0.00025834725,0.07730495,0.0006346175,0.0010739537,0.00013918157,0.000096901604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002838733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034020975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18111028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014597968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014558301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31505212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405539736","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110933","title":"Integrating movement behaviours for intra-specific conservation: The caribou case","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ministry of Forests; Government of British Columbia; University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; European Commission; University of Calgary","keywords":"Geography; Movement (music); Nature Conservation; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.05153221761740405,"score_gpt":0.26670118586525077,"score_spread":0.2151689682478467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405539736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9607706,0.0001690934,0.007946206,0.02916671,0.0005446379,0.0007454337,0.000046118676,0.0001529168,0.00045828844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985909,0.000025886873,0.0015945794,0.011536352,0.00014787815,0.00025876975,0.00020042618,0.000010869085,0.0003162697],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877816,0.00013979839,0.0003422208,0.00038400086,0.000118474,0.0002373294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886394,0.00078255247,0.00007848785,0.00019354209,0.000035373516,0.000046108686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081049587,0.00015735994,0.00012289625,0.00002437398,0.0004686679,0.00011187265,0.0001645237,0.00017268387,0.0006149975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020470736,0.00009951985,0.00008415923,0.000295473,0.00030467412,0.00020216215,0.00007539479,0.0001911984,0.00008425693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007369694,0.00007668788,0.79217005,0.000012299058,0.000031903517,0.00011148143,0.00046433724,0.000054543412,0.0028108782,0.0848521,0.10365035,0.015691672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041565223,0.00040434246,0.7579498,0.000039768463,0.000049727973,0.00021968878,0.0007269834,0.01701193,0.00057692704,0.017605934,0.20460124,0.00039795856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096450007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011682217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1009509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015642731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028592063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6733791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405580608","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110927","title":"Introduction to the special issue: Leveraging genetics in spatial conservation prioritization","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prioritization; Conservation genetics; Geography; Conservation biology; Evolutionary biology; Environmental resource management; Biology; Ecology; Genetics; Management science; Environmental science; Engineering","score_opus":0.026137674098909908,"score_gpt":0.2259266531471672,"score_spread":0.1997889790482573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405580608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8937524,0.000051428782,0.005397294,0.09763609,0.001035462,0.0006196136,0.000006071161,0.00009351881,0.0014081491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838333,0.00012377366,0.0007989221,0.0068871854,0.0061860625,0.000046690584,0.00017350494,0.000011432825,0.0019391156],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987164,0.00014646961,0.00027112057,0.00042528307,0.00024516808,0.00019556461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962604,0.0000837807,0.000046863148,0.00017475091,0.000025198151,0.000043346725],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005728447,0.00012895976,0.00009801525,0.00007977646,0.00021447774,0.00013012158,0.00017844631,0.00009287115,0.0019964927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016190966,0.00009460995,0.000037492282,0.0006884201,0.00010355765,0.00013201975,0.0001857509,0.00011062633,0.00065100094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005590824,0.00004761757,0.7723515,0.000016932754,0.000007839419,0.0000064841815,0.0010364219,0.0016003059,0.0020446077,0.00018705579,0.14731744,0.07532791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007368428,0.000036872832,0.5076454,0.0000071909785,0.000005743055,0.0000011161441,0.00011293732,0.005814789,0.00007691783,0.0001693797,0.48597464,0.00008131571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000930121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001645633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3386572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024800413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016314632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405635233","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110939","title":"Measuring forest degradation via ecological-integrity indicators at multiple spatial scales","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Degradation (telecommunications); Ecology; Environmental resource management; Geography; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.05348581230477186,"score_gpt":0.234192470382984,"score_spread":0.18070665807821212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405635233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960268,0.00007606619,0.0018758286,0.00071234046,0.00023632622,0.00023711738,0.000011758251,0.00020355162,0.0006201804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910235,0.00003111899,0.00027790392,0.0002870123,0.00007957828,0.00004434176,0.00013466354,0.000006237631,0.000036802765],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886906,0.000110780515,0.00025070418,0.00037422418,0.00017861769,0.00021663003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994915,0.00023573368,0.000063436826,0.00012142884,0.000007937902,0.000079923535],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003906414,0.00013505768,0.00013747312,0.000037394995,0.00020375017,0.00005824207,0.00015772198,0.00020319932,0.0009864514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011541761,0.0000830253,0.00006668192,0.00023345402,0.00004840007,0.00019956398,0.00016801867,0.00013471424,0.0010826838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025345309,0.00003946632,0.9888521,0.00001657054,0.000007783741,0.0000061050223,0.000020058993,0.000057025547,0.0046165595,0.00006260873,0.00027782042,0.006018565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011532065,0.00008206726,0.9554682,0.000018180439,0.0000074730715,0.0000056082067,0.000009214462,0.03380219,0.001337559,0.0006769275,0.00833672,0.00014053681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001396797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021436345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033745162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021293548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006644903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405654860","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110945","title":"Corrigendum to “Spatial distribution of tree-related microhabitats in European beech-dominated forests” [Biol. Conserv. 301 (2025) 110867 10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110867]","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"Beech; Forestry; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.03432780008283131,"score_gpt":0.2208639492552846,"score_spread":0.18653614917245329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405654860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656691,0.0013942149,0.0000066486186,0.007113118,0.007999343,0.0017432724,0.003910352,0.0002849654,0.011879005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73796916,0.00040513644,0.000040523355,0.00076857035,0.0007288099,0.000100972444,0.029659221,0.000009916085,0.23031767],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621993,0.0006872822,0.0010619792,0.001078519,0.000271447,0.0006808467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985085,0.00033459067,0.00042216835,0.00015759333,0.00040869552,0.00016843615],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008473658,0.00061879185,0.0009262387,0.000100231475,0.00031421232,0.00007160484,0.0006681262,0.0011881787,0.0028322502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094450027,0.00029071854,0.00035723363,0.001116455,0.0005937221,0.000091384005,0.0006180181,0.0009831925,0.00285503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044425976,0.00024248155,0.026527494,0.000077163786,0.00012699893,0.00009455939,0.00007263174,8.7026325e-7,0.0035760296,0.000096325064,0.96098286,0.0077583245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028526728,0.0011040132,0.5683349,0.00021022385,0.00006499928,0.000005331297,0.00012134751,0.00006930974,0.00015058898,0.00028534143,0.42894685,0.000421842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021149113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018687591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5418074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020863728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007670645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406063140","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110956","title":"Projecting bird assemblage responses to climate-driven changes in managed boreal forest landscapes of Québec","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Université Laval; University of Alberta; Natural Resources Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Geography; Taiga; Boreal; Ecology; Assemblage (archaeology); Climate change; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.024843820766010584,"score_gpt":0.2655054547653041,"score_spread":0.24066163399929355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406063140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956529,0.0000146305765,0.000057535308,0.0021768485,0.000056259887,0.000560234,0.0000055963656,0.000082953506,0.0013930495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989388,0.000010785041,0.00041119521,0.00046803177,0.000011052444,0.00009319963,0.000007425736,0.0000056421377,0.000053848533],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989749,0.000249969,0.00022806272,0.00025191833,0.00009672335,0.00019840208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919784,0.0005396543,0.00008764714,0.00013678009,0.000010422761,0.00002766436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063920266,0.00009834027,0.00018129067,0.00009798382,0.000054740838,0.000013938402,0.00015616199,0.000096233285,0.000027454587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000821828,0.00007452656,0.000025241521,0.0004630367,0.000040925792,0.00005904034,0.00015920342,0.000069393136,0.000039518764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017195949,0.00003687026,0.9630665,0.000028959352,0.0000031985435,0.0000035127737,0.00008684164,0.000027683524,0.033336956,0.000112398826,0.00024678325,0.0028783293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018865599,0.00020473133,0.99283004,0.000069823116,0.0000030670597,6.3100026e-7,0.000091120906,0.003100763,0.001881351,0.000023125842,0.0015242624,0.00008240968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039789286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51059693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47080764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012857892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001755317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9666048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406256171","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.110966","title":"Sea turtles in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, a step towards understanding bycatch and management of these species in tuna fisheries","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Huntsman Marine Science Centre; Crown Investments Corporation (Canada)","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; European Commission","keywords":"Bycatch; Tuna; Fishery; Fisheries management; Geography; Oceanography; Biology; Fishing; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Geology","score_opus":0.05738132491799137,"score_gpt":0.24388019046227255,"score_spread":0.1864988655442812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406256171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922047,0.000109748056,0.000112851616,0.005723637,0.000019152822,0.000223442,0.0000036511976,0.000007045537,0.0015957755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99843335,0.0005696753,0.00017415005,0.0007301528,0.000002677965,0.000014059035,0.000015048529,0.0000010309222,0.0000598759],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994155,0.00012748114,0.00015265752,0.00015489102,0.00005366132,0.00009577749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997412,0.00013625498,0.000039801573,0.000070916794,0.0000026358657,0.000009211468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036082714,0.00006849259,0.00009459832,0.000032062766,0.000042831925,0.000015513247,0.00008615997,0.00007863076,0.00002847274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003717915,0.000042794818,0.000010384405,0.0002241098,0.00030517773,0.00006631847,0.000079653124,0.00006540831,7.9222906e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045757406,0.000020006357,0.98662055,0.000020489115,0.00000468307,0.000004037386,0.00042800023,9.3925814e-7,0.00024484252,0.010844225,0.00013659718,0.0016298726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020294817,0.0000385911,0.98770636,0.000038579547,0.000004083031,0.0000011940631,0.0024210035,0.000113386064,0.000030308329,0.007854991,0.0015392795,0.000049269915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006902811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022863168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006228633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004589162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000048241145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17451221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406733111","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110934","title":"Increased bird abundances over 30 years in an extensive commercial forest landscape","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society","funders":"National Council for Air and Stream Improvement; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; Weyerhaeuser Company","keywords":"Geography; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Agroforestry; Forestry; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.024042085296487423,"score_gpt":0.2750704495905706,"score_spread":0.25102836429408315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406733111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99780536,0.00003222661,0.00009481505,0.0006031289,0.00007578209,0.00012972587,0.00000272362,0.000040070205,0.0012161633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963366,0.000022974655,0.00019333872,0.0033442262,0.000011249847,0.000025349442,0.000020179308,0.0000020782834,0.000044032462],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942493,0.00010314751,0.00013786704,0.0001752089,0.0000444477,0.00011440293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996821,0.00017445628,0.000042182914,0.0000707938,0.000011158827,0.000019286237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016980921,0.000063551735,0.000103990045,0.000029061744,0.000086440945,0.0000101919595,0.00008566535,0.00009661668,0.0003203325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015617078,0.000051758227,0.000017966307,0.0001703345,0.00018078825,0.00009128545,0.00006695299,0.00007374107,0.00007392667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035741446,0.000049597707,0.9963283,0.0000012436767,0.000003187032,0.0000027898484,0.00007174613,0.00009075695,0.00041377978,0.0018655254,0.00041072915,0.0007265868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003058387,0.00007126368,0.99114645,0.0000049354667,0.0000028865588,1.9825634e-7,0.000059248126,0.0035477392,0.000006285261,0.004093618,0.00069770013,0.000063830164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000561609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017685449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017123839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047923044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011982511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98688954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406793001","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.110985","title":"A case study from a critical stopover site in the East Asian-Australasian Flyway provides lessons for optimal high-tide roost management to support shorebird conservation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Muskoka Community Foundation; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Flyway; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.04605942507372283,"score_gpt":0.30405246914748746,"score_spread":0.2579930440737646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406793001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9692496,0.0000022222398,0.007049437,0.020344151,0.00011848522,0.0025764697,0.00022031272,0.000050556875,0.00038877304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99346685,9.203629e-7,0.0032143772,0.0022618724,0.000026713402,0.0006434696,0.00019987732,0.000008378533,0.00017755662],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981919,0.0002352625,0.00045719353,0.0005658784,0.00020554978,0.0003442447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991417,0.00037800203,0.00006511527,0.00031597682,0.00002583786,0.000073383584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007304739,0.00020636829,0.00023513888,0.00005726293,0.00021795776,0.00012161311,0.00026833487,0.00011834211,0.0001437195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002907289,0.0001462498,0.000061193256,0.00042336955,0.00009925934,0.00017593145,0.00021162108,0.00013321731,0.000051962066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047010317,0.0008801053,0.97523785,0.00004265252,0.000041560867,0.00075086957,0.0017660329,0.0004277913,0.001094958,0.006329802,0.0049996334,0.007958636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010126802,0.0007879889,0.9747814,0.00003941772,0.00006347452,0.000046558504,0.010522591,0.0076292064,0.00001800051,0.0013456278,0.0034853336,0.0002677169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005060248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042812325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037752077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021617087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019759886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97465384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407056252","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111007","title":"Five recommendations to fill the blank space in indicators at local and short-term scales","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Blank; Term (time); Space (punctuation); Environmental science; Geography; Computer science; Physics; Materials science","score_opus":0.023981627383922254,"score_gpt":0.2987795719517804,"score_spread":0.27479794456785817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407056252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98398334,0.000016300231,0.00032408317,0.013052975,0.000043079086,0.0002494102,0.000010640909,0.000012916732,0.0023072688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99594915,0.000057990434,0.00020492371,0.0031178142,0.0000057842913,0.00003615043,0.000029308554,0.000001949599,0.00059694174],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993802,0.00009873009,0.00013125742,0.00018207278,0.00007238916,0.00013537593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997017,0.00014043167,0.000024302395,0.0000829985,0.0000014025887,0.000049197322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001713288,0.000077563855,0.00008168772,0.000025620873,0.00017215102,0.000016335855,0.000102086495,0.000075197655,0.00029562123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005185529,0.000049902752,0.000017945402,0.00023727187,0.0002617323,0.000063869404,0.00028111084,0.000075073396,0.000051251474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013744274,0.000034394805,0.9865014,8.808234e-7,0.0000032114622,6.379421e-7,0.00016550971,0.000013139193,0.0019670103,0.00029559125,0.00245417,0.008550325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009007727,0.00004274475,0.9913825,0.000008007014,0.000002717146,3.9202854e-7,0.00027208525,0.00009606627,0.00031201064,0.00049524836,0.0072338614,0.00006433189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002730453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011613758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011965811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023644255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003657439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3236845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407241486","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.110989","title":"Triangulating habitat suitability for the locally extirpated California grizzly bear","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of California, Santa Barbara; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Geography; Habitat; Ecology; Biology; Ursus; Sociology; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.034061513258855786,"score_gpt":0.26067015944027266,"score_spread":0.22660864618141688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407241486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9593472,0.000043834974,0.023094067,0.015776545,0.00018765833,0.0008068333,0.000017793182,0.000075040894,0.00065106276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908435,0.000006009185,0.0012985831,0.007219699,0.000032313383,0.00021855893,0.000054270506,0.0000034047398,0.00032369272],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897707,0.00015738248,0.00029498673,0.0002828847,0.00007850738,0.00020916169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820244,0.0014477181,0.00009543943,0.00018912392,0.000037453094,0.000027827053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009120594,0.00010742155,0.00012855204,0.000015202778,0.0004373579,0.000024443312,0.00019385504,0.00017285421,0.0003388464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018417544,0.000067150075,0.000069065354,0.00029959017,0.00026243288,0.00008332219,0.00008790974,0.00010608183,0.00008405365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014378759,0.000039690873,0.9838596,0.0000044964627,0.00001108037,2.4888914e-7,0.000019082592,0.00010066961,0.0013067161,0.0011983624,0.0056355433,0.0076807225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040708843,0.00008044623,0.96440154,0.000005518406,0.00001516887,4.5744142e-7,0.00004465377,0.0096259825,0.00011185312,0.0061039687,0.019119658,0.00008364972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019710566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006026525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031496305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010054683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030024303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37101305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407241527","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111002","title":"Compassionate conservation in practice: A values-driven, interdisciplinary, pluralistic, and deliberative community","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation Techniques and Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Nature Conservation; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Sociology; Geography; Political science; Ecology; Biology; Philosophy; Environmental science","score_opus":0.10076300387652347,"score_gpt":0.3538668274045466,"score_spread":0.25310382352802313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407241527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9048958,0.00025079702,0.00092601345,0.06133475,0.00022885707,0.0005944239,0.000038128634,0.00020105636,0.03153016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886969,0.00015314567,0.0008039523,0.009162268,0.000033253604,0.00007835447,0.00010499435,0.0000047332333,0.000962411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985898,0.0005478867,0.0004268825,0.00020138052,0.000085787,0.00014822707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799263,0.0012870131,0.00014972588,0.00015045764,0.00039370495,0.000026477734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054861966,0.00015989502,0.00025283697,0.00013154386,0.00075529615,0.00012946331,0.00011753065,0.00008770229,0.00007880257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007161001,0.00012282017,0.000038569655,0.00011842637,0.0004907168,0.00030196612,0.00030398407,0.00031506733,0.0000049001665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033185346,0.00027307105,0.04764976,0.000048538528,0.0000623594,0.0000053279637,0.014544174,0.0000027969977,0.00024862867,0.9077793,0.024707211,0.0043469802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001628383,0.0006237167,0.47734976,0.00047119765,0.00007071331,0.000005794693,0.03971382,0.0077753603,0.000112148,0.16177477,0.30991566,0.00055867084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016835621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004226074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7460045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007404265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042472984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5809204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408192493","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111070","title":"Protected area edges host more warm-dwelling bird communities than the rest of the landscape","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Academy of Finland","keywords":"Host (biology); Geography; Rest (music); Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.04256484684176904,"score_gpt":0.24857648267668483,"score_spread":0.2060116358349158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408192493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899016,0.00006806846,0.00024374243,0.008037732,0.00007822316,0.00027539866,0.0000069567004,0.000036524707,0.0013517516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984941,0.000052119427,0.00007285536,0.0010876292,0.00000568326,0.000048633185,0.000010809878,0.0000019399815,0.00022622288],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994395,0.00018906516,0.00014422183,0.00008130523,0.000057686397,0.00008826731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992842,0.00043411466,0.00008693612,0.00016484932,0.000022997887,0.0000069206494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024296138,0.00006581569,0.00008467951,0.000011757598,0.00041809632,0.000008249626,0.00023678842,0.00007552075,0.000048181897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020181228,0.00003076497,0.00003432102,0.00022251053,0.000613644,0.000030058478,0.00019256065,0.00012903224,0.000005817097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017946782,0.00002278871,0.9961986,0.0000046852183,0.000011116908,8.2854775e-8,0.00043031774,0.00021384176,0.0015501336,0.0011078032,0.00028688074,0.00015582769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000869195,0.000034101507,0.99097943,0.000018254388,0.0000075596404,3.4993056e-7,0.001324629,0.0044263955,0.00034489774,0.0020632704,0.0006734937,0.00004070561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039831694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002919795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008592504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002115795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010607335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32157013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409181276","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111109","title":"Continental declines in North American small mammal populations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mammal; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.07484642545319886,"score_gpt":0.2993634067095292,"score_spread":0.22451698125633035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409181276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960567,0.000012044053,0.00010263173,0.0025128212,0.000064314336,0.00013116199,0.000003835206,0.000031570675,0.0010849255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973787,0.000011109028,0.0009629346,0.001371187,0.000009030739,0.000031252985,0.000027047921,0.0000012811871,0.00020745724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943596,0.000052531726,0.00017464434,0.00017473903,0.00003175629,0.00013038173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998092,0.000062867766,0.00004972331,0.000054990825,0.000006689564,0.00001652224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008341981,0.00006966567,0.00011234212,0.000023524997,0.00009927355,0.0000052760656,0.00007721391,0.00004144175,0.00013456095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012699762,0.000053407224,0.0000255991,0.0003555828,0.00029426833,0.00003507235,0.000099715064,0.00007091198,0.000052897947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032906122,0.000061881576,0.99572486,5.044582e-7,0.0000016989535,0.0000031485597,0.000011466511,0.000012363238,0.0004552712,0.0004391584,0.00039835717,0.0028584155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013449103,0.00006953434,0.99728733,0.0000014678606,0.000004507136,4.2016643e-7,0.000052960837,0.000111571295,0.000017897457,0.00015103276,0.0021067243,0.00006207366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013519798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08130738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07995541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004828332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004588799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93545634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409588495","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111159","title":"Vehicle collisions and visitor disturbance reduce survival and reproductive success of kangaroos in a national park","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Australian National University; University of Melbourne; Université de Sherbrooke; Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment","keywords":"National park; Visitor pattern; Disturbance (geology); Geography; Reproductive success; Wildlife; Ecology; Demography; Biology; Archaeology; Population; Computer science","score_opus":0.024768017249016873,"score_gpt":0.27042920412367616,"score_spread":0.2456611868746593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409588495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932663,0.000076590186,0.00005963775,0.0051441975,0.00007667042,0.00019277258,0.000007853485,0.0000112757525,0.0011647199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905616,0.000024406729,0.00024477585,0.0004435828,0.000015575406,0.000031937845,0.000011610423,0.0000012903668,0.00017066622],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992409,0.0001287784,0.00018763289,0.00027824784,0.00008013914,0.00008430335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994769,0.0003303138,0.000070324284,0.00007368832,0.000029958861,0.000018793642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043641313,0.00006329201,0.00011463749,0.000027550754,0.0000848966,0.0000078443945,0.00006122932,0.00009110503,0.00003132259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078302174,0.00005325216,0.000010853045,0.0002763391,0.00030489918,0.00012258724,0.00008989988,0.00007043897,0.000002172397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000843309,0.00003798475,0.98891,0.000004071123,0.0000039392366,4.3993623e-7,0.00005457451,0.000011247344,0.0053264345,0.0046924357,0.00032815197,0.0005463614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026382238,0.000043459364,0.9928561,0.000011584499,0.0000029630226,5.6038357e-7,0.000054288805,0.0007192072,0.00057229615,0.00479923,0.0006215483,0.000054973574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027786518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020627405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057898723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058499852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025364072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21715601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409979079","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111186","title":"Merging coastal archaeology and conservation paleobiology to evaluate shellfish resilience to Indigenous harvest over the past 3000 years","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre; Assembly of First Nations; University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Hakai Institute; Co-operative Education and Work-Integrated Learning Canada; University of Victoria","keywords":"Resilience (materials science); Indigenous; Paleobiology; Geography; Shellfish; Archaeology; Conservation; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Paleontology; Aquatic animal; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.028692233466226406,"score_gpt":0.27440937489153866,"score_spread":0.24571714142531226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409979079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836019,0.000072089504,0.0005158511,0.013995944,0.00009914693,0.00069879054,0.000011215833,0.00003931405,0.00096572173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97464615,0.00010295066,0.0006985716,0.024047842,0.000027338243,0.00010957754,0.0000149395655,0.0000045728407,0.0003480586],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985097,0.0002754076,0.00028792143,0.00046674107,0.00013432484,0.00032590452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921143,0.00040038442,0.000076653676,0.00020478782,0.000029779496,0.00007697787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006673755,0.00015264777,0.00020428549,0.000041664836,0.00023224863,0.000027677235,0.0002830711,0.00010146728,0.00031306208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057512074,0.00010735928,0.000031168292,0.0004884418,0.00046115334,0.00007074868,0.0010078916,0.00012575013,0.00013889727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008793807,0.000020324482,0.9788727,0.000005235884,0.000010785103,0.0000031314628,0.0003341942,0.000044234777,0.003560629,0.0009569014,0.0037732068,0.012330678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015748794,0.00022174817,0.90082085,0.000010871264,0.000009323642,0.0000030394458,0.0000764727,0.00012617113,0.000046692177,0.00070531777,0.09770465,0.00011736542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005888183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017683072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.093931444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007444638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002017485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.986757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410093099","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111156","title":"Operationalising Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas criteria for ecosystem-based conservation and management: The Bay of Biscay case","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Coastal and Marine Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca; HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme; Generalitat de Catalunya; UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Bay; Ecosystem; Marine ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04153340421750547,"score_gpt":0.27748021800145417,"score_spread":0.23594681378394872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410093099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96165675,0.000009644982,0.017695798,0.012279685,0.00010225483,0.0018332845,0.000054182914,0.000054293356,0.006314124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887387,0.00003940922,0.006008381,0.0041163336,0.0000143691395,0.00030814818,0.00012600732,0.0000038706344,0.0006447626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871236,0.00019150486,0.000435505,0.00037801967,0.00010082241,0.0001818044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893916,0.0006406837,0.00014614845,0.00018436418,0.000052872587,0.000036788468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081980287,0.00015938692,0.00020351917,0.00004331721,0.00026539122,0.000060494658,0.00017344818,0.00009222598,0.0006840478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032550254,0.00008364313,0.000056078658,0.00028323923,0.00022777916,0.00007367036,0.0008346076,0.00005207415,0.0000044492017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020814692,0.0006507695,0.7642843,0.00047829468,0.00015719721,0.00015015264,0.000045970428,0.0005765589,0.009878277,0.15183575,0.011462486,0.05839875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017733994,0.000960184,0.8727195,0.00006659211,0.00010380804,0.000029879855,0.00021838772,0.034014292,0.0006365526,0.019450705,0.06966464,0.00036200995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012722501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011837762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13238506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057167475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015559503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7489844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410219176","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111105","title":"Intense international exploitation of African hornbills necessitates urgent conservation measures, including CITES listing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Credit Valley Hospital","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"CITES; Listing (finance); Geography; Business; Fishery; Biology; Finance","score_opus":0.06865926499137316,"score_gpt":0.28137746096929245,"score_spread":0.2127181959779193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410219176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790493,0.000050906176,0.0040514283,0.012503108,0.00038386276,0.00029639364,0.000010076482,0.00008903834,0.0035658688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99299,0.000050721388,0.0019380893,0.004464445,0.000033565077,0.00007371351,0.00013550144,0.000005816636,0.00030810782],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983965,0.00023271264,0.00058783096,0.00036276956,0.0002210134,0.00019916223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851567,0.00073598867,0.0003615591,0.00016310952,0.00016848676,0.000055211207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085909653,0.00016243845,0.00021581404,0.00011886797,0.0002080885,0.0000325231,0.0002613011,0.0001804054,0.0005425459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033304216,0.00014186482,0.00006933667,0.0005623378,0.0002980188,0.0003558759,0.00019571195,0.00013620453,0.000030423915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013846417,0.00006592813,0.96179223,0.000008399652,0.000032340417,0.000001220146,0.00022051428,0.000085713706,0.024921106,0.0028130983,0.005231825,0.004689135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003490511,0.00008270676,0.97913796,0.000055461885,0.000020134597,0.0000015233384,0.00053139846,0.003780325,0.002670672,0.0061711473,0.007044343,0.0001552992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058255764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025017143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022250434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018919619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049847535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59404975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410235487","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111214","title":"Variable social-ecological indicators across a Tanzanian protected area network","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Canadian Anthropology Society; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; African Wildlife Foundation","keywords":"Variable (mathematics); Geography; Ecology; Environment variable; Protected area; Tanzania; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.024215704513156133,"score_gpt":0.2370232457342204,"score_spread":0.21280754122106427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410235487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98046696,0.000016935765,0.0027627365,0.0042325007,0.00012676208,0.00064574054,0.000012575085,0.00017875242,0.011557031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98853487,0.000009341758,0.0021935015,0.0070551634,0.000054177104,0.000089960115,0.00007421421,0.000003870423,0.001984927],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985747,0.00018435571,0.00026393883,0.000413951,0.00017151242,0.00039155147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995453,0.00009396019,0.00012807193,0.00015497887,0.000021454165,0.000056266173],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000568157,0.00015892151,0.00018649947,0.00003376573,0.00090404844,0.00006407627,0.00030426178,0.00027072022,0.0015719067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020989218,0.00012113322,0.00006599345,0.0011742435,0.00035780898,0.00006998259,0.0005437809,0.0001634069,0.00011875372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058701728,0.00012500223,0.98481,0.0000068415156,0.000023789786,0.0000031219888,0.0001057287,0.00007306315,0.0006904166,0.001049631,0.009459914,0.0035938132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027721337,0.000056617482,0.8264458,0.000006599831,0.000011195233,3.5002114e-7,0.00012534334,0.0004317991,0.000015233407,0.0021931005,0.17030646,0.00013028487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003495714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000114857176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16084655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018501474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019233217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410286809","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111211","title":"Spatial scale and conservation options for carpet sharks","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Geography; Fishery; Cartography; Biology","score_opus":0.025573387164287854,"score_gpt":0.26052211404784476,"score_spread":0.2349487268835569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410286809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97530323,0.000036311365,0.011588026,0.00951814,0.00017829076,0.00038110398,0.000017388262,0.000049589424,0.0029278947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901507,0.00003354527,0.0026840041,0.0058336225,0.000030231242,0.00012377878,0.00016876703,0.000002321377,0.0009730218],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935776,0.00007358894,0.00015764569,0.00024071756,0.000029029436,0.00014123431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996249,0.00020189879,0.000039527054,0.00008789953,0.000018746792,0.000027009688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023610909,0.00008212135,0.00011009676,0.000021850517,0.00017669848,0.000010339216,0.0000752977,0.00018861047,0.0003405232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002226612,0.000065370456,0.00002791961,0.00009169738,0.0002925564,0.00005845676,0.00011235771,0.00006102283,0.000036976337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011577727,0.000034280285,0.95867777,0.0000052084247,0.0000075866305,2.5318545e-7,0.000015297519,0.0000047816634,0.015021792,0.011202246,0.009184892,0.005730095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038524598,0.00011700994,0.9081357,0.0000034423213,0.000011639277,0.0000020183436,0.00001540001,0.002747769,0.00049543305,0.008447561,0.079554155,0.000084620195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010504909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015379706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070369266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003304995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000118532835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37284902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410330041","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111218","title":"The use and abuse of ecosystem service concepts and terms","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Ecosystem services; Service (business); Geography; Environmental planning; Business; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.03775945717127686,"score_gpt":0.24670785717440946,"score_spread":0.2089484000031326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410330041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99847054,0.00009150412,0.000017329889,0.0008767073,0.000042393054,0.00014220756,0.0000065477184,0.000013628649,0.00033911128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998763,0.00021316425,0.00005914485,0.0009215038,0.000005259793,0.00000944717,0.0000041200788,0.0000011279469,0.000023216695],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995365,0.00006589723,0.0001470036,0.00012865735,0.000043049262,0.0000788876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953115,0.0002815413,0.00005986208,0.00009486705,0.000011109027,0.000021482629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017003108,0.000055004126,0.00008518137,0.0000062691465,0.00012019512,0.000038774575,0.000075744654,0.0000565798,0.000015737187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003263965,0.000027750599,0.000009607828,0.00009754492,0.000028029632,0.000115185976,0.00007342789,0.000026772672,0.000007598477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026172716,0.000010116013,0.9954691,0.000029087854,0.000007551245,2.61926e-7,0.00010032309,0.000008420296,0.002321063,0.00077572034,0.00018611952,0.0010660513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020496789,0.00003195803,0.956849,0.00003531294,0.0000068407744,0.0000016100195,0.00007695386,0.004675857,0.00036180438,0.00044499827,0.037257317,0.00005341154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041264988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030528659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038620144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009609952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000022892943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17035708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410386299","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111246","title":"Outdoor recreation in protected areas affects animal-mediated seed dispersal","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Colegiul Consultativ pentru Cercetare-Dezvoltare şi Inovare; Ministerio de Universidades; Narodowe Centrum Nauki; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii; Universidad de León; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Réseau de cancérologie Rossy","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Recreation; Seed dispersal; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.055572626476655,"score_gpt":0.23394566012546072,"score_spread":0.17837303364880572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410386299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930006,0.00013407705,0.000004043982,0.0052951183,0.000031636875,0.00044835938,0.000027221367,0.00012859161,0.0009303238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878544,0.000068307316,0.000039598133,0.00062165456,0.000048550904,0.000073337505,0.00022621793,3.473769e-7,0.00013652974],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991561,0.00013197846,0.00017440478,0.00026018152,0.000076765245,0.00020056718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994258,0.0004142986,0.00006090259,0.000016392398,0.00005168818,0.00003088086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019715975,0.00012269901,0.00017842717,0.00002018838,0.00012805987,0.00003168964,0.0001033055,0.00015734433,0.000050818566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006270769,0.000044930905,0.000042572552,0.00057500525,0.000055459564,0.00006708057,0.00005020551,0.00010242352,0.0000211956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018507359,0.00004575121,0.53373176,0.0000032207709,0.0000050462527,0.0000023000957,0.000008453331,8.5507764e-8,0.4634766,0.0005260878,0.0002292818,0.0017863631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001906944,0.0002577173,0.9928154,0.00004337586,0.0000037090742,5.534086e-7,0.00008515372,0.00036826637,0.0016919902,0.00023213483,0.004199088,0.00011191364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047654478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003169517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4617846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038430113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008327027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18322292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410431210","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111245","title":"The potential of abandoned tree plantations to support the recovery of the mammal community","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mammal; Geography; Tree (set theory); Agroforestry; Ecology; Forestry; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.026461017595125237,"score_gpt":0.24474921245522827,"score_spread":0.21828819486010304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410431210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98315924,0.000005818195,0.00048088026,0.013568883,0.0001819083,0.00030920154,0.000014327711,0.000009108725,0.002270632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960975,0.000013030981,0.000073561074,0.0031997028,0.000008297173,0.000033899607,0.000014863726,0.0000012769211,0.00055787974],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989633,0.00050730485,0.0002554794,0.00008211786,0.00009275457,0.00009905162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987019,0.0008603269,0.00013362021,0.00026597816,0.000025751477,0.000012466796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077213184,0.000058978207,0.000084134204,0.000010835997,0.0005804865,0.000009067728,0.00040187011,0.000077167984,0.00009947251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005186823,0.000026876418,0.00005908614,0.0002771321,0.0004334052,0.000046916128,0.00020115633,0.00014113396,0.000013231835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022854215,0.00006167293,0.9719224,0.0000026789114,0.00001812329,1.2787032e-7,0.00010228725,0.00015129606,0.01161507,0.0027248024,0.0088300025,0.004342991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015028172,0.00011867647,0.9922607,0.0000051686984,0.000013683849,9.2214736e-7,0.00018681822,0.00009984539,0.0011243945,0.003749942,0.0022580184,0.000031531523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057814823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021469798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020338312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026544749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003201711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44646916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411010200","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111207","title":"Estimating the landscape-scale abundance of an arboreal folivore using thermal imaging drones and binomial N-mixture modelling","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"National Parks and Wildlife Service; Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales; Taronga Conservation Society Australia; Ecological Society of Australia; Paddy Pallin Foundation; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; Equity Trustees; Australian Academy of Science; Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment","keywords":"Arboreal locomotion; Abundance (ecology); Scale (ratio); Ecology; Geography; Environmental science; Biology; Habitat; Cartography","score_opus":0.019387954929396302,"score_gpt":0.24167562603304332,"score_spread":0.22228767110364703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411010200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97646093,0.000050032257,0.021712402,0.0011671644,0.00008833031,0.0001477125,0.0000030611566,0.000026443227,0.0003439382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871519,0.0000034302818,0.011776562,0.0009865961,0.00004148609,0.000009252562,0.000013094598,0.000003049076,0.000014633171],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927735,0.000115299605,0.00019952166,0.00021062749,0.00006400923,0.00013317967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995909,0.00014377764,0.0001107496,0.00011786221,0.000015512262,0.000021203365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003371769,0.00009126551,0.00011303723,0.000018094068,0.0002642452,0.000021408927,0.0001241139,0.000089936635,0.000037709888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049501683,0.000060340648,0.00002323741,0.00014649257,0.00027978097,0.00018495014,0.00008208054,0.0001029009,0.0000013691266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045668887,0.000022398664,0.9664991,0.0000049815676,0.00000440151,5.5735603e-7,0.00013176094,0.022849873,0.0065831766,0.00031808848,0.000034440556,0.0035055864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001040663,0.000019404448,0.46686658,0.00001020148,0.000008091748,0.0000016588949,0.000055434284,0.53134257,0.00012840773,0.0013981258,0.000021575535,0.000043870845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043012822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008802696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5084927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021949762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016154603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24606203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411195084","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111284","title":"Marine monitors: Land-based citizen science observations show AIS data underrepresents coastal vessel traffic co-occurring with marine mammals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Marine Alliance for Science and Technology for Scotland; UK Research and Innovation; Heriot-Watt University","keywords":"Citizen science; Marine species; Marine protected area; Geography; Oceanography; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.10942881529762359,"score_gpt":0.3131640352010565,"score_spread":0.2037352199034329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411195084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879843,0.0000130981,0.00048380153,0.0022286226,0.00007795754,0.0005053013,0.000078053556,0.00014135246,0.008487506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925896,0.00003926038,0.0044715353,0.0020407292,0.00003663338,0.000058376834,0.0004949917,0.000008982181,0.00025992325],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978822,0.00009847538,0.0003542156,0.00081531727,0.00043142104,0.0004183988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870545,0.00029273637,0.00014401996,0.00068662263,0.0000661035,0.000105048886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000662166,0.00023824384,0.00026941622,0.000067486035,0.00050309254,0.00011577912,0.0009926147,0.00008714026,0.00068687194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005872998,0.0001773117,0.000035879428,0.0011215466,0.0008157208,0.00042425236,0.002270738,0.00017225584,0.00004933555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009411621,0.000120995166,0.98785335,0.000019446397,0.000017679298,0.0000059438044,0.0000062488475,0.00040186662,0.0006903853,0.00020215547,0.00216038,0.008427464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000583807,0.00013123508,0.9699664,0.000030818086,0.000022996086,0.0000018426341,0.000034604716,0.013629317,0.00023048888,0.00019524242,0.01495596,0.00021728859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042790147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045882906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01788692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016051729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095171614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75207657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411508505","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111313","title":"The spatial distribution of tests of conservation interventions does not align with global conservation needs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Regent College","funders":"Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond; Imperial College London; Cambridge Philosophical Society","keywords":"Distribution (mathematics); Nature Conservation; Geography; Environmental resource management; Spatial distribution; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Remote sensing; Mathematics","score_opus":0.023206287959941306,"score_gpt":0.2630334375636898,"score_spread":0.23982714960374849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411508505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9637407,0.000031068637,0.019253254,0.015465422,0.0002124166,0.0005608825,0.00010115364,0.00005107539,0.0005840318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971588,0.000034575212,0.00050358137,0.0016367927,0.000017533695,0.000086558895,0.00030732923,0.0000038348485,0.0002509399],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820703,0.00031637723,0.0007598317,0.0002679899,0.0002312571,0.00021753478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981611,0.000733585,0.0005751813,0.00029251684,0.00020027894,0.00003736872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079661096,0.00017637476,0.00025586504,0.000036581547,0.00031969513,0.00002509788,0.00027183184,0.00022086501,0.00010258092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009629356,0.00010587037,0.00011477983,0.0008604385,0.00095725455,0.00021856125,0.00012539998,0.000114167044,0.000011299414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046254726,0.00013689624,0.9660407,0.000028742907,0.000043427965,4.273274e-7,0.000023492861,0.00003725554,0.00369898,0.02345381,0.0026788134,0.0033949225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058304326,0.0003071107,0.9872593,0.00008961388,0.000054983262,0.000001865597,0.00013632808,0.001672273,0.0022775626,0.004927314,0.0025681339,0.00012242633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026216093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005638478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03341816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016375424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089049834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43172684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412074701","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111343","title":"The role of ‘bright spots’ in elevating conservation success in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Spots; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.009930808414335706,"score_gpt":0.2040001034516352,"score_spread":0.19406929503729947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412074701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99610084,0.00010105012,0.000004891285,0.0014348599,0.000054524615,0.00015579794,0.000002543003,0.000005485312,0.0021399925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927557,0.00003266003,0.000025873918,0.0006166906,0.0000043739115,0.000019717054,0.000010011924,0.0000012326258,0.000013900593],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992312,0.00009690572,0.00031030882,0.00013400339,0.00008844283,0.00013910017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947,0.0003178422,0.000093507966,0.00009505492,0.000010425408,0.000013156907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036839163,0.000059797607,0.00010553705,0.000017867702,0.00006275819,0.000010792617,0.00016032589,0.000048053927,0.000073269715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009552818,0.00003566859,0.000011847423,0.00036613375,0.000019268215,0.00008068481,0.000059961396,0.000060026567,0.000004149336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021776668,0.000009769783,0.99450034,0.00000605593,0.0000014821062,7.567968e-7,0.000016699476,0.000115023526,0.0013112479,0.00064837787,0.000057199777,0.0033112466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014496372,0.000006482192,0.980021,0.000031418236,9.635858e-7,1.6777119e-7,0.00016846774,0.011818436,0.0014554717,0.0019372349,0.004369299,0.000046068115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89489895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9812272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08632825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021341212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000083378036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14545229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412106872","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111339","title":"The sound of recovery: Integrating acoustics into fish status assessments and recovery strategies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sound (geography); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Environmental science; Acoustics; Fishery; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.04052412581921868,"score_gpt":0.30581291274523315,"score_spread":0.2652887869260145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412106872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98492473,0.00016306854,0.0026013688,0.000553772,0.00008381298,0.00016518158,0.0000072834537,0.00001702515,0.011483776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955529,0.0015506162,0.0017850888,0.00088652456,0.000008187771,0.000016356975,0.000009803103,0.0000021671704,0.00018837595],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992642,0.00009442264,0.00023202349,0.00017353288,0.00009217687,0.00014367109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916905,0.0005713368,0.00011474469,0.00010200674,0.000022997645,0.000019877185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033098174,0.00008842951,0.00012487457,0.00000923585,0.00021819219,0.00006247762,0.00010889422,0.00006159483,0.000072078736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005831868,0.00005360931,0.000026353999,0.00015758115,0.00024748073,0.00013221105,0.00032733142,0.00008661016,0.0000031936513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011985747,0.00003990174,0.8563279,0.0000345311,0.00004545455,6.702028e-7,0.000051381667,0.000036481953,0.005532307,0.007715179,0.0033821645,0.1267142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010351319,0.0002478547,0.95425177,0.000018180906,0.000011394138,2.3518817e-7,0.00079042104,0.00054287445,0.000050960072,0.034089934,0.009821458,0.0000714324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022186833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034336692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12664276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009133584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021894415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33540002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412419513","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111318","title":"Market patterns within Indonesia's songbird trade","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"Business School, Queensland University of Technology; Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan; Queensland University of Technology","keywords":"Songbird; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.02701065671503118,"score_gpt":0.24993957078901205,"score_spread":0.22292891407398086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412419513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931731,0.0000059275835,0.0006334839,0.0035399897,0.00013827794,0.0001596393,0.00000494225,0.00006349456,0.002281098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948002,0.0000050645554,0.00026376985,0.0040997854,0.000011710708,0.0000314905,0.000014506144,0.0000021372468,0.00077134627],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993364,0.000103597464,0.00015931972,0.00020889918,0.000053716692,0.0001380412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997346,0.00008134828,0.00004890148,0.000103241524,0.0000024042395,0.000029515664],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020091527,0.00008059523,0.000095823125,0.000015517462,0.00010263672,0.0000097074435,0.00012647411,0.0001682283,0.0029327718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053095857,0.000059416358,0.00003081515,0.00013352331,0.00014629253,0.00006573119,0.00007236799,0.00010495465,0.0001485596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029942663,0.000069685586,0.9907318,0.00000160187,0.0000025927816,0.0000041261724,0.00001660995,0.0000013599947,0.0019206878,0.00016052183,0.0045903227,0.0024707774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002113037,0.000051343806,0.9957036,0.000004953805,0.000006941838,0.0000018400542,0.000031427036,0.000078781195,0.00060214225,0.00046479836,0.0027673312,0.00007552921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000273308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001301497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004971836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050499006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000788909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412524871","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111370","title":"Effect of drought on wildlife activity at artificial waterholes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Wildlife; Geography; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.02005739747983208,"score_gpt":0.2598409538477608,"score_spread":0.2397835563679287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412524871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920271,0.0000036568929,0.00014104776,0.004301244,0.00015199147,0.00024788507,0.0000040449086,0.000042356423,0.00308066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99653167,0.000004245315,0.000037708676,0.002830563,0.000017921873,0.000036088815,0.000020152824,0.0000022983647,0.0005193722],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901426,0.00032444988,0.0001818153,0.0002467737,0.000092496586,0.00014020203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991857,0.00054093293,0.0000915751,0.0001498679,0.000008247736,0.000023692177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047624606,0.000108165616,0.00016518788,0.000026373435,0.00014248426,0.0000059017043,0.000112126625,0.00017865795,0.00044573986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033940596,0.00007503435,0.00005438448,0.00019060713,0.00023817814,0.00007278888,0.00010918123,0.000085442654,0.00020868407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074699195,0.00007386278,0.9471499,0.000008018023,0.000008613116,9.208559e-7,0.000010864338,0.00003795113,0.03869986,0.0010988038,0.0041207736,0.008043481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021683161,0.0005313362,0.92988807,0.000010873937,0.000009880341,3.9077136e-7,0.0000018506981,0.0004034781,0.06442497,0.0008930177,0.0035455835,0.00007369506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008871911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008459945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025725104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101344864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007699401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4880539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412656352","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111392","title":"Contemporary genetic adaptation in zoos and conservation breeding programs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Adaptation (eye); Geography; Captive breeding; Conservation genetics; Biology; Ecology; Zoology; Environmental ethics; Endangered species; Habitat; Genetics; Neuroscience; Microsatellite; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05840756577730152,"score_gpt":0.2643925911015905,"score_spread":0.205985025324289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412656352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97672015,0.0010089566,0.01944912,0.0011604596,0.00010105908,0.00041609578,0.0000032333944,0.000020443556,0.0011204839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840333,0.00005436234,0.014091242,0.0013657092,0.000045306115,0.000068258436,0.00015990731,0.000004786178,0.00017715099],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991678,0.00009476422,0.00025688458,0.00029625502,0.00005302932,0.00013127191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968046,0.00003737963,0.0000681537,0.00011326595,0.000069668415,0.000031057763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017003051,0.00011426308,0.000114771516,0.000048707076,0.000056406207,0.000023654391,0.00007908651,0.00019638831,0.0000041219896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015138995,0.000102153674,0.000024548595,0.00014374529,0.00012215915,0.0000053505864,0.00005252443,0.000068087655,0.000001707018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020957674,0.00009740073,0.9129607,0.000032412696,0.00002275323,7.201169e-7,0.000080523096,0.000062650564,0.049290057,0.010039326,0.0014582814,0.025745617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065653876,0.00040332862,0.9843171,0.000036816964,0.0000053546887,0.0000025541306,0.00018603445,0.0008288664,0.0010135263,0.0043262523,0.008087894,0.00013569847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013136628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000780646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07135645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010295943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008496706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4165706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412720782","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111394","title":"A comprehensive framework for managing human-wildlife conflicts: The case of smallholder livestock depredation by puma (Puma concolor) in the Argentine Dry Chaco","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Conservation Leadership Programme","keywords":"Puma; Wildlife; Livestock; Geography; Human–wildlife conflict; Fishery; Environmental protection; Environmental resource management; Business; Ecology; Forestry; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.055137646225717006,"score_gpt":0.3066217949379151,"score_spread":0.2514841487121981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412720782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97597283,0.000084188934,0.008235313,0.013943394,0.00010719811,0.0012625166,0.000019235053,0.000027848415,0.0003474942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97705203,0.000024492036,0.0008903883,0.021368729,0.000027878994,0.00038712274,0.000119883254,0.000004833911,0.00012462364],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985384,0.00039510583,0.00044340597,0.00031695855,0.00008871627,0.00021746788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977151,0.0017077948,0.0002494777,0.00025642902,0.0000490759,0.000022121652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006852703,0.00014929294,0.00019728066,0.00003782481,0.0003815168,0.000028720511,0.00030057892,0.00023661462,0.00012742827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046146708,0.00009448611,0.00006627112,0.00038065718,0.00041284252,0.00011849597,0.00011019477,0.00021309411,0.00001030534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001483855,0.00018547343,0.93742496,0.000029755685,0.000033469845,0.000010181064,0.00068159145,0.00009274378,0.0030180586,0.050936144,0.0060803522,0.0013588866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070271344,0.00020320174,0.9575185,0.000037570946,0.000030301435,0.000009193021,0.0010433964,0.002096771,0.00015657267,0.02163681,0.016429773,0.00013515756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006674885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043736128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029299334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006487849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013964621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38530317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413119560","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111403","title":"Inferring the role of habitat heterogeneity in SLOSS (single large or several small) for beetles, spiders, and birds in forest reserves","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"German Academic Exchange Service; Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten; Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.06211961889556304,"score_gpt":0.2507704107044448,"score_spread":0.18865079180888172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413119560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968726,0.00027523286,0.0000037489433,0.0023966704,0.00003250115,0.00032413704,0.000040294966,0.000012967298,0.000041828047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935126,0.000056879762,0.00008852524,0.00041479451,0.000011469801,0.000026198184,0.00003219243,2.2093975e-7,0.00001847104],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993317,0.00009649272,0.00018883441,0.00017504599,0.000032189186,0.00017575077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919546,0.0006621504,0.00005666326,0.00002956292,0.000042727475,0.0000134475695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038173594,0.00007841756,0.00015725155,0.000018791581,0.00015765194,0.000013521769,0.00012274386,0.00013032091,0.000004895529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046613964,0.000026203277,0.000037034555,0.0002297226,0.0001504559,0.00004950316,0.0001489319,0.00006633921,4.218884e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023590382,0.000085364554,0.9915344,0.00001138418,0.000007300984,6.3079955e-7,0.00002807563,0.000003503887,0.005810395,0.001354257,0.000043922693,0.00088482886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028099364,0.00029366536,0.9929709,0.000026625892,0.0000033650304,3.8913458e-7,0.0004971022,0.00017802716,0.00081095425,0.0032951022,0.0015835833,0.000059324007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077403284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20963137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20885733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001958786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007314047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8047908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413313020","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111429","title":"The Zoo Sphere of Influence Model","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo","funders":"Chester Zoo; Department of Conservation, New Zealand; University of California","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.017210135285734174,"score_gpt":0.2184674789070961,"score_spread":0.20125734362136194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413313020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861728,0.000043196313,0.0011982922,0.0035193875,0.000031104733,0.00015707081,0.0000023159607,0.000022739205,0.008853118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99557817,0.00005143385,0.00042118004,0.0016820135,0.0000032153664,0.000006989047,0.0000040452137,8.496781e-7,0.002252091],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994703,0.000044902517,0.000149964,0.000137136,0.000099446515,0.00009828575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996374,0.00011066528,0.00006459258,0.00015078086,0.000020294645,0.000016217045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022272329,0.00005787598,0.00006234361,0.000009656062,0.0002956513,0.00002111775,0.00022015047,0.000052408497,0.00009388366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013620747,0.00003456874,0.00003308333,0.00020643251,0.0003614543,0.000043510016,0.00022822093,0.000043453536,0.000034543056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024896271,0.000021170448,0.9879757,0.0000037563495,0.0000062879,1.8121531e-7,0.000042289823,0.0019392234,0.0025421232,0.0013651652,0.0020515642,0.004027654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010075264,0.000019653664,0.9394748,0.0000052940654,0.000005882712,6.068871e-8,0.0000908716,0.011470706,0.00019214541,0.003117214,0.04547745,0.000045169138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035349696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001692999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048500888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003975787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000128982265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22739406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413485087","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111440","title":"The recovery of rodent-mediated seed dispersal processes after open-pit marble mining","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"China Postdoctoral Science Foundation; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Rodent; Open-pit mining; Biological dispersal; Seed dispersal; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Geology; Mining engineering","score_opus":0.02993355695755261,"score_gpt":0.27099310094603807,"score_spread":0.24105954398848545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413485087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99480075,0.00015077248,0.000043485063,0.001423515,0.00007314269,0.00020271579,0.0000063736825,0.000015505486,0.003283772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974279,0.00011526087,0.00017279475,0.0007797015,0.000004757276,0.00008316068,0.000008920276,0.0000015197825,0.0014060009],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994351,0.00006149914,0.00016484507,0.0001639363,0.000052856332,0.00012173697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994138,0.00040914776,0.00006866896,0.000075714306,0.00001959229,0.0000130704775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022891213,0.000066923996,0.0001035328,0.000007845298,0.0001855737,0.000020391699,0.00021047787,0.00008536604,0.0002800734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005620783,0.00003800733,0.00002049146,0.00019775573,0.00031848473,0.000098036435,0.0003476386,0.000054036238,0.000032794713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000249003,0.000046495315,0.99470073,0.0000044917037,0.00000851981,9.649799e-7,0.000032000073,0.0000015295832,0.0032387732,0.00013695293,0.0007781615,0.0008023612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013196075,0.00012751864,0.99231184,0.000010803307,0.000010367093,2.4320875e-7,0.00018081442,0.000039305323,0.0003682555,0.00021555142,0.0065517295,0.00005163226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017207969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012652688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005773568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027803926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019369962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30666074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413900851","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111463","title":"Small patches have high conservation value for primates","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Conseil régional de Bourgogne-Franche-Comté; Erasmus+; Universidad Veracruzana","keywords":"Geography; Value (mathematics); Ecology; Biology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.1353864771866247,"score_gpt":0.35050619029920255,"score_spread":0.21511971311257785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413900851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97764695,0.00012920334,0.009244631,0.0073501845,0.0009070546,0.00081048044,0.000058024383,0.00021058276,0.0036428715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98500013,0.0000147184155,0.0031083205,0.008792189,0.00006915934,0.00064697827,0.00053361076,0.000010547808,0.0018243324],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986404,0.00016573931,0.00040440774,0.000410276,0.000044969107,0.000334206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998619,0.00079107255,0.00013860514,0.00024646526,0.00016445844,0.000040396153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043487706,0.00017209054,0.00027754842,0.00008960364,0.00016851297,0.00003030945,0.00018980452,0.00042092017,0.00026650593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037784156,0.00014273127,0.00008971293,0.00014061533,0.00013790383,0.000051894596,0.00005810953,0.00011214262,0.0000679992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040318156,0.00022836174,0.63081294,0.000032154345,0.00005150211,0.000002875364,0.00009804288,0.0000016615827,0.016456308,0.33411363,0.012700571,0.005098786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010624696,0.00028114204,0.9456609,0.000012521941,0.00004845452,0.0000025458369,0.00016435754,0.00016062112,0.0026364229,0.021531304,0.028257392,0.00018187446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070114154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010729623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31484795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075907476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058821184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5820412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414225755","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111438","title":"Mitigating collision-caused bird mortality through message framing: Insights from residents' intentions for bird-safe windows","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute for the Social Sciences, Cornell University","keywords":"Centrality; Wildlife; Normative; Biodiversity; Value (mathematics); Framing (construction); Cognition; Risk perception; Citizen science","score_opus":0.05704996559497539,"score_gpt":0.30433617722394307,"score_spread":0.2472862116289677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414225755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81762093,0.00022971774,0.1790412,0.00056666596,0.00040999296,0.0004976081,0.000053638607,0.00079379004,0.0007864681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926466,0.000090368325,0.005704563,0.0010297686,0.000058476075,0.00015367632,0.00019773246,0.000024303215,0.0000945345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988108,0.000080902566,0.0004966802,0.00028130924,0.00014901716,0.00018125703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988333,0.00062346534,0.000083896026,0.00023421008,0.00018224605,0.000042857595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016790994,0.00017542011,0.00023615266,0.00006594598,0.0002147124,0.00007841176,0.0001660527,0.0002732425,0.000031576277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079597824,0.0001512399,0.00010655254,0.00036730716,0.00007535844,0.00019370938,0.000045843008,0.00016104367,0.000022207412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013079272,0.00025767792,0.52603847,0.0002534744,0.00062591844,0.00000801605,0.0007687308,0.0067427787,0.25354573,0.201978,0.008072107,0.0015782928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010374759,0.00005460328,0.7578792,0.00017428854,0.00006757255,2.1425257e-7,0.00042593342,0.16840509,0.006126965,0.06071596,0.004783348,0.00032934765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032446746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009227645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24741878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091490794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046463658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61673844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415488842","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111559","title":"Who gets the spotlight? Disparities in seabird research attention at scientific conferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Seabird; Threatened species; IUCN Red List; Biodiversity; Taxon; Endangered species; Uria aalge; Taxonomic rank","score_opus":0.18761154496594734,"score_gpt":0.34811538300345996,"score_spread":0.16050383803751261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415488842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9637288,0.00010261232,0.000012759355,0.013436013,0.00015699436,0.00023277102,0.000015403897,0.000028857181,0.022285787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943474,0.000112590955,0.000004714112,0.0005720876,0.000007672955,0.0000579625,0.000099391065,0.0000013943936,0.004796813],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988274,0.00025364582,0.00016818837,0.0002715114,0.00023424816,0.0002450344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995254,0.00022084775,0.000032969096,0.00015565653,0.00003862678,0.000026490065],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011645943,0.00006817548,0.00008266229,0.00004206499,0.0005444938,0.0001286574,0.00022564361,0.00008615902,0.0055826367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002742355,0.000041011863,0.000029364825,0.00049920974,0.0010448463,0.00008820133,0.00028814364,0.00012225476,0.0005204548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027269396,0.000037667265,0.94241685,0.0000039569227,0.0000014969509,0.0000010336344,0.00003690151,7.759602e-7,0.007941248,0.029251765,0.019687336,0.00059371896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010832097,0.00002012412,0.8886478,0.0000121397,0.000001073662,2.943648e-7,0.00043352088,0.0001357946,0.0005983799,0.002436071,0.10755836,0.000048143575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008918975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069633806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08787103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004025782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016731947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415563992","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111552","title":"Increasing the credibility of conservation plans through citizen science","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Liber Ero Foundation; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","keywords":"Credibility; Citizen science; Field (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Representation (politics); Sampling (signal processing); Expert opinion","score_opus":0.08316813312659413,"score_gpt":0.30340132293927974,"score_spread":0.2202331898126856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415563992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9624543,0.000017534407,0.00055635354,0.0060271667,0.00009109736,0.0001966215,0.000035582725,0.00003624925,0.030585073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99626815,0.00002478742,0.00017547837,0.003410242,0.0000068964932,0.000014087996,0.000040501276,0.0000011303156,0.000058702222],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999103,0.00011239278,0.00022805022,0.0002211405,0.00018331096,0.00015206792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993252,0.00029912728,0.00009850303,0.00020455472,0.00005161384,0.000020977754],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009747405,0.00007130279,0.0000955164,0.000014157177,0.00028042658,0.000027152997,0.0002651416,0.00006228905,0.0030513927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011753247,0.000044237615,0.000033027198,0.0006844867,0.0014483983,0.00015060285,0.00017394972,0.0000659275,0.000041487274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056454035,0.000041929277,0.87914723,0.000004474991,0.0000026020607,1.6847953e-7,0.00006773257,0.0000024897813,0.08357523,0.0333679,0.0032880616,0.000445731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013786831,0.000030383155,0.97583336,0.000007905729,0.0000045719253,0.0000012061257,0.00049692654,0.00029595324,0.0060292846,0.0035906748,0.013520316,0.00005153445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014419705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022741267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09668615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021747698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003271149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99785995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415566024","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111567","title":"Landscape heterogeneity supports bat diversity: Importance of wetlands and intermediate forest cover in coastal British Columbia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Wetland; Habitat; Biodiversity; Climate change; Bird conservation; Ecosystem; Habitat destruction; Ecosystem services","score_opus":0.019979938194548998,"score_gpt":0.21331962523766237,"score_spread":0.19333968704311338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415566024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99868643,0.00016028037,0.0000012077886,0.0006080321,0.00009204962,0.00014087207,0.000081034355,0.000019915973,0.00021018994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998524,0.00027352688,0.000008713377,0.0008701103,0.000016952814,0.000011144146,0.00016470939,2.1847046e-7,0.00013060533],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992841,0.00007419436,0.00021041538,0.00023297442,0.00003632783,0.0001619905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957997,0.00024203383,0.000081053986,0.0000279692,0.00004344977,0.000025519523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023135294,0.00006795564,0.00021507755,0.000007991518,0.00017965992,0.000020975398,0.000092286486,0.00019047558,0.00015893181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014586572,0.000040094426,0.000036872276,0.00014843684,0.00025312838,0.000054296164,0.00032082113,0.00008053807,0.0000013764505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004815406,0.000046067824,0.99514914,0.000005969527,0.0000131652605,0.000008234093,0.00000835731,1.4558118e-7,0.0013902328,0.000027665821,0.0017793829,0.0015234633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002463283,0.00019798463,0.99779654,0.000016265758,0.0000064147603,0.0000038550797,0.00007459194,0.00002144408,0.000034788194,0.00073483685,0.0007929511,0.000074030206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032804569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5378115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53453106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007627753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005901339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49590912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415778362","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111549","title":"Management interventions boost orchid conservation: Evidence from Guizhou, China","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Forestry and Grassland Administration; Guizhou University; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Species richness; Threatened species; Ex situ conservation; Biodiversity; China; Protected area; Species diversity; Global biodiversity; Nature reserve","score_opus":0.16782238234240182,"score_gpt":0.28807178735561173,"score_spread":0.12024940501320991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415778362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750428,0.0015189402,0.00013073269,0.019698521,0.00012614687,0.00029154963,0.00007895469,0.00014749584,0.0029648484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950082,0.0010033575,0.00037692988,0.0020533695,0.00010967125,0.00006287667,0.00021001171,4.2833506e-7,0.0011751786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989129,0.000114895876,0.0003242981,0.00034358652,0.00011192437,0.00019243055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992821,0.00047188945,0.000099780504,0.000040250732,0.00006792632,0.00003805125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023090215,0.00014665854,0.00018894735,0.000015658043,0.00035098882,0.0000740125,0.00026210147,0.000099032484,0.00044197933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021905634,0.00005750356,0.0001385384,0.00038008078,0.000095618896,0.00012302773,0.00019626264,0.00009383031,0.000067129426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021582295,0.00017718259,0.8272312,0.00003974541,0.0001146145,0.000014604347,0.00003248663,7.8613573e-7,0.085528694,0.012016657,0.026297001,0.04833116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010470171,0.00011871672,0.95804656,0.00035670795,0.000023489612,5.2049916e-7,0.0000947592,0.000065959706,0.0003954551,0.0034453636,0.037218764,0.00012901334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078237493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025079136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1308153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029990737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000049382224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48393637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416031665","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111607","title":"Promising governance approaches for reversing biodiversity loss","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fulbright Canada; Stanford University","keywords":"Corporate governance; Biodiversity; Indigenous; Multi-level governance; Restructuring; Politics; Environmental governance; Global biodiversity","score_opus":0.07383675120400929,"score_gpt":0.22652224407751972,"score_spread":0.15268549287351044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416031665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789066,0.000042084826,0.0056210863,0.0100907525,0.00011712727,0.00055268675,0.00002144109,0.00006483818,0.0045833904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930242,0.00003006231,0.0030760674,0.0025125174,0.000019075651,0.000015227394,0.000058569003,0.0000016577802,0.0012626495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992256,0.00004903646,0.00013545014,0.0003168461,0.000101777216,0.00017127031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964154,0.00009512898,0.00008538814,0.00013184293,0.000016024644,0.000030052544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029074,0.00010019154,0.000107510656,0.000019996753,0.0005123531,0.000034631037,0.00018884774,0.00009277598,0.00013621933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014000371,0.000084426414,0.00006555075,0.00024096941,0.0002149136,0.00010408773,0.00023749734,0.00005221805,0.000047283447],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008152681,0.000050836014,0.98554796,0.000018899564,0.000013069715,8.16526e-7,0.00006458427,0.00004881581,0.00033350268,0.0005387215,0.0069001005,0.006401161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035006754,0.000033681896,0.84739643,0.000012090212,0.000017198188,2.5737137e-7,0.00012698065,0.0010670001,0.00020569404,0.0006603365,0.15002476,0.00010548021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027217617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006593369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14312465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001819369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008401675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39406574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416277651","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111527","title":"Guideposts and guardrails for biodiversity accounting in the 21st century","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Engineer Research and Development Center; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Nature; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Biodiversity; Biodiversity conservation; Global biodiversity","score_opus":0.030816152309442936,"score_gpt":0.24480998504722018,"score_spread":0.21399383273777725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416277651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97446597,0.00005412188,0.0003127153,0.018715326,0.00005164601,0.00051827845,0.0000055975765,0.000018034265,0.0058583086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96568185,0.00014742865,0.0006145959,0.033387844,0.000005313794,0.00004191727,0.00003014661,9.44021e-7,0.00008993802],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994276,0.000074682604,0.00013167202,0.00018528852,0.00006837031,0.00011235913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967813,0.00017601936,0.00004054281,0.0000902336,0.0000034504183,0.000011612297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051918486,0.000065168664,0.00006172985,0.000020354582,0.00016758799,0.00003044399,0.00012664105,0.00004972326,0.0000830812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014685432,0.000044176508,0.000021242202,0.00014420821,0.00011862981,0.000094728275,0.00014201677,0.00005233399,0.000021659947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027365139,0.000043495053,0.9693637,0.000007873787,0.0000038698577,6.760799e-7,0.00009892635,0.0000044865446,0.00235886,0.0062880088,0.013394278,0.0084084915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022418927,0.000022498087,0.7797388,0.000004235407,0.00000401529,2.6169604e-7,0.00066140725,0.000101288526,0.00005654556,0.00081588834,0.21832193,0.00004898498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003376175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027212137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20492765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005286034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000023639716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18014656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416376251","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111600","title":"Shadow under the lamp: Evidence-based assessments reveal local extirpation risk of large Indian civets (Viverra zibetha) concealed by intensive activity in human-dominated landscapes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Care Foundation","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Sympatric speciation; Leopard; Range (aeronautics); Biodiversity; Wildlife conservation; Population; Shadow (psychology); Conservation status; Taxon; Species distribution","score_opus":0.03696257518365347,"score_gpt":0.31091230624648575,"score_spread":0.27394973106283227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416376251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98890156,0.000037328613,0.006091999,0.0041492847,0.000084430976,0.0005062046,0.000026746302,0.000026364163,0.00017611378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949203,0.000028083286,0.0000579679,0.0047238846,0.000008564756,0.00007578312,0.00009960649,0.0000035766925,0.000082209765],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998178,0.000782558,0.00032348448,0.0003373065,0.00015948154,0.00021918114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836004,0.0010066794,0.0003356425,0.00018414717,0.00008762601,0.000025851348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010212716,0.00014656273,0.00022731627,0.000057281613,0.0002205177,0.000016247915,0.00022039705,0.00027626185,0.00022942452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006574934,0.00010450723,0.0000536553,0.00048453378,0.00033344538,0.0002814993,0.000105340805,0.0002824123,0.000013343431],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026373155,0.00012746597,0.98346955,0.000008336082,0.0000145154945,0.00000157086,0.00005189485,0.00018338795,0.011810183,0.0002951541,0.0027196952,0.00105449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090447225,0.0001685632,0.9881667,0.000068898626,0.000020391142,2.7360076e-7,0.00030732687,0.0061854557,0.0025415004,0.0013959403,0.00013041028,0.00011008336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001666807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025996745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009268682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021235272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005686121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4261681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416683867","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111636","title":"A practical framework for ecological integrity monitoring in resource-limited parks","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hôpital Notre-Dame; Carleton University","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Staffing; Recreation; Resource (disambiguation); Monitoring and evaluation; Best practice; Adaptive management; Workflow; Capacity building","score_opus":0.14045866823522793,"score_gpt":0.3603813761513002,"score_spread":0.2199227079160723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416683867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95807934,0.00001811782,0.012443817,0.02541887,0.00013135857,0.00045224774,0.000004937586,0.000056194072,0.0033951052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962479,0.00002774755,0.033409387,0.0038322173,0.00004869222,0.00012411877,0.000019272129,0.0000035489568,0.000056028715],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988348,0.0001913346,0.00026919943,0.0003559654,0.00011166431,0.00023704405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997943,0.0017905837,0.00006202344,0.00014924919,0.0000053686076,0.00004981918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069308095,0.00012143594,0.0001551439,0.000026139602,0.00012925641,0.000021201071,0.00014068116,0.0005158222,0.00019924475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027452481,0.000093803676,0.00005779799,0.00025076166,0.00029307924,0.00009812246,0.00017488688,0.00061143737,0.000040581024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025654974,0.00033004122,0.9392186,0.000008458382,0.0000063669163,0.0000050607828,0.00004160704,0.000055086464,0.0021305662,0.055016886,0.0013140712,0.0016167349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024734603,0.0001516525,0.8117469,0.00003263261,0.000005613496,8.8814e-7,0.000104993116,0.0006331202,0.0006403673,0.17282261,0.013496735,0.00011712822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035275087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001535684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12747166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020701838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010130387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39784932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417439743","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111671","title":"Wildfires and the natural regeneration of a terra firme forest in the eastern Amazon region","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics","keywords":"Amazon rainforest; Seed dispersal; Regeneration (biology); Ecosystem; Abundance (ecology); Natural regeneration; Biological dispersal; Seedling; Species diversity; Dominance (genetics)","score_opus":0.017228260458365674,"score_gpt":0.22322916360264333,"score_spread":0.20600090314427766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417439743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99020684,0.00014352883,0.00014910597,0.008478534,0.00007489014,0.00043999057,4.9782176e-7,0.000009474118,0.0004971316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985564,0.00001977731,0.000032363852,0.0012653825,0.0000142202225,0.00004646001,0.0000075373478,0.0000012748087,0.000056608664],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999165,0.00036654566,0.00017128437,0.00013585573,0.000083028724,0.00007829348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993881,0.00039215718,0.000077712895,0.00013030504,0.000005285279,0.000006440516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005725395,0.00006238757,0.0000908909,0.000015219628,0.00006471428,0.000020187137,0.00013458508,0.000057848993,0.000004744952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002768866,0.000028185543,0.000022281147,0.0001674499,0.00024175287,0.000073357056,0.00005486626,0.00007355292,0.0000036800293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011587143,0.000016100077,0.99003154,0.0000070762158,0.0000023362868,7.895245e-7,0.0001851257,0.000015269869,0.0021408466,0.0023792589,0.0005369978,0.0045687887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042522443,0.00005215751,0.9578738,0.000025784446,0.0000031983975,0.0000028650186,0.000055391494,0.039454266,0.00012795521,0.0012124559,0.00073138386,0.00003552563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002668693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019827087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039438996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026842194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038951775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40342832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W567649335","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.015","title":"The importance of natural habitats to Brazilian free-tailed bats in intensive agricultural landscapes in the Winter Garden region of Texas, United States","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Bat Conservation International; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Predation; Biodiversity; Geography; Population; Agriculture; Agricultural land; Biology; Agroforestry","score_opus":0.0443806648906066,"score_gpt":0.2465175769831929,"score_spread":0.2021369120925863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W567649335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96326935,0.00037291987,2.4191016e-7,0.035803642,0.00009303821,0.00031579178,0.000014211314,0.000011297202,0.0001195177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971085,0.00008196592,0.000012852834,0.0025564719,0.000033192962,0.00002602224,0.00013724992,3.8527753e-7,0.00004333181],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987765,0.00036994234,0.00036321866,0.00019250775,0.00008512105,0.00021269069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982877,0.0011195885,0.00016388498,0.000071672235,0.0003286214,0.000028557124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059087295,0.00011814808,0.00022640835,0.000020319614,0.000076761076,0.000009834826,0.0003754055,0.00013937679,0.000006486832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017211686,0.000029966763,0.000049670878,0.00049558666,0.0002452869,0.000048058722,0.000116963645,0.00016117997,0.0000036024035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030988303,0.000039470124,0.98840714,0.0000020095533,0.000012256557,0.000003962771,0.0005219952,0.0000052813334,0.002118707,0.00025013858,0.00785737,0.00047176867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024599687,0.00046736747,0.9861565,0.000019247876,0.0000030457275,0.0000051640955,0.00896774,0.000026877526,0.00020387136,0.0010770721,0.0027484312,0.00007868962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024661224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027279127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03383919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021670552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000064994542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99047047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7089771026","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111492","title":"Art's role in non-material values research: Exploring values and environmental change in Maya Lin's What Is Missing?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Environmental change; Valuation (finance); Wildness; Natural (archaeology); Formative assessment; Maya","score_opus":0.16874742487748165,"score_gpt":0.3366999243839095,"score_spread":0.16795249950642785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7089771026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99395835,0.00034263087,0.000005567831,0.0050149625,0.000094840965,0.000358554,0.0000056670942,0.000014502373,0.00020492276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99570227,0.0018494541,0.00019968307,0.00187069,0.00004967069,0.00011055294,0.000027338561,0.0000043777795,0.00018596288],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877924,0.0002044329,0.00020866681,0.00034868313,0.00015665278,0.00030235428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965394,0.00012725286,0.000035374673,0.00012477409,0.0000027696801,0.000055866603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007971492,0.00010392335,0.00014990561,0.000094279676,0.00011675136,0.000072923955,0.00010722332,0.0001284597,0.00037185056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039784773,0.00008698209,0.000017315893,0.00021862131,0.0002555477,0.00054330996,0.00021698225,0.00016561268,0.00007040877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006793685,0.000066115,0.9722857,0.000008398928,0.000001278371,0.00000454673,0.0012542802,8.1942306e-7,0.013143106,0.000022154576,0.00041482158,0.012730872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026861965,0.00013033491,0.9904198,0.00009923319,0.0000013876055,4.8193584e-7,0.0012710682,0.001262732,0.0010207678,0.0028914453,0.0025359497,0.00009820092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026062317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006845037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01813411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019081468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007907879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4071503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095010707","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111573","title":"Creating a global kelp forest conservation fundraising target: A 14-billion-dollar investment to “help the kelp”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Marine and coastal plant biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Kelp; Kelp forest; Marine conservation; Context (archaeology); Ecosystem services; Investment (military); Biodiversity; Grassroots; Marine protected area","score_opus":0.03821953974740008,"score_gpt":0.24856683907163,"score_spread":0.2103472993242299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095010707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9328246,0.00027939052,0.002795049,0.014184561,0.000369031,0.0006133163,0.000118722644,0.00009572704,0.048719596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9606828,0.000031412346,0.0016278352,0.035831913,0.00011381998,0.00001538239,0.00071883574,0.000001741462,0.0009762654],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851906,0.00025142456,0.0003762999,0.00037152608,0.00014790492,0.0003337997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890226,0.0005769196,0.00011813675,0.00019714833,0.000115655814,0.00008985875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000554444,0.00018651293,0.0002129344,0.000051787145,0.00042584396,0.000108133434,0.00025495037,0.00016820665,0.00036491716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076892343,0.000111620815,0.000066400346,0.00062446756,0.00013606783,0.00011108504,0.00006940062,0.00012530928,0.00010202555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001564975,0.000017652425,0.9710049,0.000010464778,0.000021374397,0.0000046332366,0.000036693637,0.00022990654,0.00022418633,0.0073563536,0.0062476234,0.014689728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022227243,0.0002597507,0.8527803,0.000030294592,0.000011729459,0.000008731236,0.00020317087,0.005862636,0.000050456387,0.015287095,0.12512697,0.00015662187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010948793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015240198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11887935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019712521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000112134956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99563736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7105508605","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111593","title":"Compassionate conservation practice: supporting diverse conservation actions but context matters","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Regent College; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Conservation psychology; Context (archaeology); CLARITY; Thematic analysis; Action (physics); Flourishing; Compassionate Use","score_opus":0.04794517667353484,"score_gpt":0.32970068928583113,"score_spread":0.2817555126122963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7105508605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.870547,0.000017340184,0.0027417303,0.12128125,0.00034254356,0.00066067046,0.000016813094,0.00013665979,0.0042559863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9160047,0.000026571424,0.0015346018,0.08016088,0.000021028342,0.0001164701,0.00021114467,0.000007557412,0.0019170007],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979112,0.00039181244,0.00058730925,0.0005218284,0.00026358909,0.0003242545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844277,0.0007134968,0.00034668838,0.00030841358,0.000078892175,0.00010974127],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008184976,0.0002159057,0.00021572245,0.00006503829,0.00055030425,0.00007229533,0.00020761848,0.00019656558,0.0029109004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016084427,0.00019219705,0.00008706091,0.00044952307,0.00054263906,0.0006680404,0.0002027483,0.0002382957,0.00034700622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020981925,0.00044612912,0.86938006,0.000022242983,0.000029821369,0.0000048947295,0.00036242197,0.000075881035,0.015515856,0.006649032,0.096764095,0.010539765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049386243,0.000058569974,0.68836105,0.000015623798,0.000026004083,0.0000049424293,0.009243425,0.0017536626,0.0007908131,0.0014781792,0.29756957,0.00020429764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037771612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033384058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20080549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006752115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079365745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99800056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106271513","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111622","title":"Gaps in tipping points research across freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Ecosystem dynamics and resilience","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Ottawa; Université Laval; University of Toronto; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Carleton University","keywords":"Ecosystem; Terrestrial ecosystem; Climate change; Ecosystem ecology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.04739618011252337,"score_gpt":0.3279460033877612,"score_spread":0.2805498232752378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106271513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99565923,0.000039743998,0.000054197266,0.0011129123,0.00014536722,0.00029339598,0.0000074526492,0.000017665401,0.0026700208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992024,0.000076046956,0.00021023385,0.0001520792,0.000020563875,0.000029872372,0.0000157223,0.0000021383364,0.00029098656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988175,0.00024375146,0.00024276185,0.0003042149,0.00012342697,0.00026834675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957424,0.00022541451,0.000037049154,0.000116661,0.00000890962,0.000037696092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013859217,0.00007361725,0.00011980237,0.000040457857,0.00015447321,0.000056020257,0.00015824896,0.00012709129,0.00010514185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029018678,0.000052571548,0.000016595328,0.00033030022,0.00016771803,0.0000774963,0.00041172613,0.00014722963,0.000043635268],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038515296,0.000025390551,0.9882307,0.000010986578,0.0000016122142,0.0000049501823,0.00004815197,0.000014313446,0.008464811,0.00057045,0.0003193461,0.002270762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000503473,0.00007121809,0.9487141,0.00007457195,7.326436e-7,0.0000028947552,0.00014882292,0.031147534,0.00027031786,0.0034036515,0.015559493,0.00010320827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051429076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035254538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039516628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011243661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009813643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9823496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}