{"meta":{"query_hash":"ae4b758e7150","filters":{"venue":"Bird Conservation International"},"cohort_total":42,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":42,"exported":42,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ae4b758e7150","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Bird+Conservation+International"},"results":[{"id":"W1964669622","doi":"10.1017/s095927090100034x","title":"Estimates of the genetic variability in a natural population of Bare-faced Curassow <i>Crax fasciolata</i> (Aves, Galliformes, Cracidae)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Fish biology, ecology, and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum","funders":"","keywords":"Fauna; Ecology; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Population; Habitat; Biology; Zoology; Demography","score_opus":0.011738111355666879,"score_gpt":0.24626488515760975,"score_spread":0.23452677380194287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964669622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972296,0.000010279457,0.00021815223,0.0013781339,0.00044622217,0.00024687822,0.000026796823,0.000021467453,0.0004224751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980386,0.000012040715,0.0014990026,0.00028553116,0.000019224639,0.000024055991,0.000036862308,0.000007691538,0.000076984914],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987855,0.000108951805,0.0004898164,0.00022305362,0.00025303088,0.00013966976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993176,0.00019356264,0.00021645485,0.00019436268,0.00005496757,0.000023089771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039581218,0.00010592168,0.00014760141,0.00005106317,0.000047358262,0.000009398254,0.0003418719,0.00009994441,0.00081121636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000483166,0.0000836773,0.00006205701,0.00023304857,0.00022647926,0.0001860999,0.00012754208,0.000114418974,0.000018879657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036302725,0.00009967702,0.9622896,0.0000049029645,0.000007436206,5.8697924e-7,0.000044308705,0.00026197993,0.036116283,0.00016048012,0.0002041738,0.0007743166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034197242,0.000023213746,0.9873896,0.00001634137,0.000009525937,0.0000069627376,0.000018161421,0.008796899,0.001331454,0.0015638907,0.0004184229,0.00008352339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023497213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005324942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034784827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017698799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025580004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.888225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964917378","doi":"10.1017/s0959270905000468","title":"Low productivity in the Critically Endangered Mauritius Olive White-eye <i>Zosterops chloronothos</i>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"ECW Press (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Critically endangered; Productivity; Endangered species; Geography; Population; White (mutation); Ecology; Biology; Fishery; Zoology; Demography","score_opus":0.012473701693876398,"score_gpt":0.25049349038088675,"score_spread":0.23801978868701035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964917378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9424158,0.000006205712,0.00048338948,0.051584817,0.00028186353,0.00025218315,0.00001722477,0.000050263112,0.0049082614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887567,0.000004774125,0.0010865264,0.008189938,0.0002143641,0.00010662417,0.000019055235,0.000011233533,0.0016107445],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988922,0.00009651159,0.00023895629,0.0002776593,0.0003036097,0.00019107336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960244,0.000082894054,0.000066211476,0.00017976911,0.000035182307,0.000033525164],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035093114,0.00010789238,0.00008327998,0.000040662355,0.00009352742,0.00004536741,0.00037132754,0.0000719881,0.004134842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015391297,0.000091004265,0.00003822749,0.00013033599,0.00021932709,0.0004553551,0.00008965763,0.00017074865,0.0009964613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003549191,0.00031341307,0.9862287,0.0000025091815,0.0000045923352,0.0000103125685,0.00059664965,0.00006203289,0.0015416582,0.0003771787,0.0059720613,0.004855388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003439374,0.000027833075,0.9817129,0.000010378813,0.0000059100803,0.000016876491,0.00009963238,0.0003414343,0.0011660022,0.00025215076,0.015912328,0.00011066556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008218851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036579487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04634095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018705126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020065978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997194364","doi":"10.1017/s0959270908000361","title":"Using endogenous and exogenous markers in bird conservation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Conservation biology; Evolutionary biology; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.07915736952675755,"score_gpt":0.26034777732460324,"score_spread":0.18119040779784568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997194364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965991,0.000016245436,0.00048944016,0.0012373558,0.00026240025,0.00019361026,0.0000062193376,0.000085803156,0.0011098274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950637,0.000035852037,0.0026636072,0.0018008598,0.000032418273,0.000025032183,0.000009704881,0.000020583724,0.00034820344],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990279,0.00005487174,0.00027762976,0.00025162793,0.00021670853,0.00017123144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963045,0.00007785065,0.000114540206,0.00010081747,0.000026909687,0.000049401082],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017795988,0.00011100405,0.00010302101,0.00009547027,0.00016954889,0.000015905274,0.00014000817,0.000093187635,0.0012351493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007039117,0.00012178493,0.000026394355,0.00017239034,0.00025816265,0.000331962,0.00008504812,0.000102018326,0.00019350811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048970236,0.0000719931,0.988129,0.0000015715764,0.000008024871,0.000058223377,0.00025032274,0.00010511251,0.010131042,0.00009026394,0.0004120448,0.00069340697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005739503,0.000030652143,0.99282914,0.0000076288616,0.000006840415,0.0003470205,0.000062900115,0.003699183,0.0003712265,0.00017453772,0.0017632424,0.00013368766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022650454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023892599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009759816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022882738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043128588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060261637","doi":"10.1017/s0959270905000110","title":"Priority contribution. Role of international conventions in promoting avian conservation through reduced lead toxicosis: progression towards a non-toxic agenda","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Shot (pellet); Environmental protection; Lead poisoning; Geography; Lead (geology); Habitat; Environmental planning; Political science; Ecology; Law; Biology; Medicine","score_opus":0.017595581324781503,"score_gpt":0.28768494261820665,"score_spread":0.27008936129342515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060261637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95053816,0.000051065006,0.0032933818,0.035087526,0.0005689909,0.001038435,0.000053343992,0.00016180822,0.00920727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98708755,0.00009804993,0.007613639,0.003667811,0.00010824766,0.000255256,0.00022920319,0.00003080856,0.00090944796],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971364,0.000118039155,0.0010021742,0.0005332924,0.0009052838,0.0003047783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885446,0.00006232575,0.00060865516,0.00028379884,0.000119435485,0.00007133187],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056214654,0.00025680728,0.0002468591,0.00018320029,0.0001470994,0.00008120108,0.0005320105,0.00014260928,0.0024681177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025801893,0.00028098538,0.00012971078,0.00042200918,0.00023214522,0.0013025708,0.00033643434,0.0002190089,0.00028110459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001892899,0.0011320106,0.80381155,0.000023563485,0.000113298694,0.000005469685,0.001606558,0.00047192763,0.15772624,0.0059829922,0.0056749918,0.023262082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020406472,0.00007670006,0.7996021,0.00016200196,0.00002328028,0.0000090891435,0.0003602302,0.04424939,0.03666902,0.0010508873,0.1154319,0.000324774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011918464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015904149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12105723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083776854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078209369","doi":"10.1017/s0959270905000195","title":"Habitat fragmentation in north Thailand: a case study","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Kasetsart University; University of Victoria; Earthwatch Institute","keywords":"Geography; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat fragmentation; Frugivore; Habitat; Evergreen; Ecology; Forest fragmentation; Evergreen forest; Biology","score_opus":0.01771986143185143,"score_gpt":0.23477530574974426,"score_spread":0.21705544431789284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078209369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942836,0.000003475525,0.0004859245,0.003042188,0.00025865374,0.00044955855,0.0000071199993,0.000075558666,0.001393879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99780077,0.000004575535,0.00050484453,0.0012329387,0.000033796987,0.000045133314,0.000027063972,0.000008920446,0.00034196788],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886113,0.000043109267,0.0002700673,0.00028318257,0.00040927713,0.00013321519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996443,0.00003377453,0.00010373747,0.00014286554,0.000029940653,0.000045418747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019484315,0.0001126569,0.0000818586,0.0001386948,0.00014454639,0.00006429326,0.00019609314,0.000030756382,0.000624447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035537672,0.00011403279,0.000035378718,0.00034703608,0.00006093216,0.0003042955,0.00016378019,0.000077757475,0.00036470508],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025830392,0.00034125548,0.99045736,0.0000021284586,0.000020219784,0.00039733265,0.0029068063,0.0046740845,0.000026972648,0.00003307235,0.00027011227,0.000844845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017500266,0.00006105588,0.9893652,0.00000534909,0.000010658791,0.000059569888,0.0046960064,0.0010040557,0.000008913151,0.00014576108,0.0027629607,0.00013042714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019073145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15672986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13765672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003802714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001854263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98745894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079088098","doi":"10.1017/s0959270908007545","title":"Population trends and conservation status of the Northern Rockhopper Penguin<i>Eudyptes moseleyi</i>at Tristan da Cunha and Gough Island","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Cape Town; Foreign and Commonwealth Office; Royal Society","keywords":"Geography; Population; Predation; Ecology; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.01158100065228841,"score_gpt":0.24287613741826136,"score_spread":0.23129513676597296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079088098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909986,0.000040747862,0.000065946646,0.0074579283,0.00015357864,0.00012637369,0.000038415517,0.000028154109,0.0010902263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99634343,0.000029297242,0.0002627111,0.0013290299,0.000027193519,0.000009565751,0.00006269055,0.000008531628,0.0019275654],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901927,0.000051960007,0.00029870492,0.0002227486,0.00025949316,0.00014782892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949086,0.00006930838,0.00022075523,0.0001256076,0.000044099073,0.000049370796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000120053555,0.00011465991,0.000112870504,0.000050327395,0.00018128358,0.000030618277,0.00011921978,0.000081391685,0.000737712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008703114,0.00009330901,0.000032410502,0.00015533617,0.0001564529,0.00027500078,0.00007931828,0.00007981652,0.000016199217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057303805,0.000047555135,0.9848797,0.0000016958658,0.000008637641,6.5624147e-7,0.00023635718,0.000029337734,0.0019359537,0.00023585683,0.0020690279,0.010497921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005887681,0.000048328293,0.9889043,0.000008947549,0.00002104691,0.000012287358,0.00003839353,0.000920472,0.00027073635,0.0006307529,0.008453659,0.00010229138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007310718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010316523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010395629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001443838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013901467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80774295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096691005","doi":"10.1017/s0959270910000043","title":"Introduced mammals, vegetation changes and seabird conservation on the Scott Islands, British Columbia, Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada); Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Seabird; Geography; Vegetation (pathology); Population; Ecology; Habitat; Barrier island; American mink; Fishery; Mink; Biology; Predation; Shore; Demography","score_opus":0.007307767501528855,"score_gpt":0.18483245762682887,"score_spread":0.1775246901253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096691005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9366805,0.0000059894714,0.000060680555,0.05793972,0.00086793123,0.0002563633,0.000018365436,0.000049813425,0.004120612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807457,0.000026401987,0.00015116205,0.015430095,0.0002178685,0.00006929408,0.00004499761,0.000015106144,0.0032994035],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989243,0.000041732947,0.00018005351,0.00026641824,0.00044825787,0.00013920433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994998,0.00013330231,0.00011796175,0.00015353037,0.00004608852,0.00004931314],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029653357,0.000086838685,0.00007770773,0.000020966543,0.00023533001,0.00032043082,0.00020255461,0.00004513033,0.0014882422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017576099,0.00009619312,0.000016965316,0.000117460324,0.00009959183,0.00014959509,0.00007995526,0.00014477124,0.000052253406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010623751,0.000025666335,0.7898431,0.0000054152288,0.00002131255,0.000004536943,0.00006449165,0.000017899676,0.001377388,0.00088797486,0.1979585,0.009783134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003048522,0.000020074653,0.8204414,0.000017665967,0.000006579557,0.00000933378,0.000052721025,0.0034792917,0.00007866066,0.00045010902,0.1750255,0.000113772665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.695232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9919632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29673123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008116021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044112905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098747420","doi":"10.1017/s0959270912000251","title":"The European wintering population of Steller’s Eider <i>Polysticta stelleri</i> reassessed","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Scheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration; Alberta Agricultural Research Institute","keywords":"Eider; Geography; Population; Fishery; European population; Distribution (mathematics); Ecology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.018451213651251977,"score_gpt":0.24670639012422024,"score_spread":0.22825517647296828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098747420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98060524,0.000015308211,0.0008538152,0.0010031693,0.0009113734,0.00011224057,0.000004610704,0.00005086765,0.016443396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99763167,0.000008752534,0.00035900666,0.00029368355,0.00010924435,0.000008854119,0.000014846046,0.000015253959,0.0015587126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991314,0.00009399272,0.0002900902,0.00011150376,0.00022425139,0.00014880506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994716,0.00012850107,0.00018421882,0.00014722394,0.000025657917,0.000042777967],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046043153,0.00007869139,0.00006471054,0.000023221364,0.0001433313,0.000021818889,0.00024103528,0.000033616754,0.001116143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008605343,0.00006291757,0.000040342897,0.0000830716,0.00011276839,0.00033438797,0.00012948691,0.00006890315,0.0003762562],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019430074,0.000049389364,0.9900158,0.00000119646,0.0000126024925,5.318108e-7,0.00010931041,0.000029506273,0.0036028211,0.00045004973,0.0015465512,0.004162779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016764908,0.000011349639,0.98829406,0.0000075863227,0.000010216882,0.0000074433424,0.0000785779,0.00021181007,0.0005025417,0.00009831237,0.010540584,0.00006984144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015468738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017873557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017026426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007444694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000456267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099010145","doi":"10.1017/s0959270911000244","title":"Distribution and abundance of Chubut Steamerducks: an endemic species to Central Patagonia, Argentina","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Neotropical Bird Club; Rufford Foundation; Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Geography; Range (aeronautics); Abundance (ecology); Population; Habitat; Ecology; Shore; National park; Fishery; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.031265739363988895,"score_gpt":0.2418703501407332,"score_spread":0.2106046107767443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099010145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99585694,0.0000026870339,0.002310289,0.0004094264,0.00028538928,0.000114172755,0.00009191664,0.000031438434,0.0008977684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99784106,0.000008042071,0.0010236879,0.00030335295,0.00003245734,0.000015882919,0.000066088585,0.0000059172357,0.00070349075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931574,0.000025694273,0.00019289266,0.00018628396,0.00015048034,0.0001289127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968904,0.000015453095,0.00010036757,0.00009842928,0.000027582631,0.000069125876],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009937514,0.00007157727,0.00007120448,0.00002354967,0.000057113557,0.000009367509,0.00016216443,0.00004516026,0.00309154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004208289,0.00007323443,0.000020031332,0.00007444215,0.00015631954,0.0002909227,0.00007774485,0.000052317744,0.0001043168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003857285,0.00009687647,0.98945534,0.0000013898208,0.0000059147383,0.0000013661715,0.00040932343,0.000004492732,0.0064654476,0.0013901648,0.0008152002,0.0013159126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015800023,0.000063269596,0.98824525,0.0000056651697,0.000007025174,0.0000060140433,0.00009287593,0.000090589034,0.0055421344,0.0002990376,0.005411639,0.000078512036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022845823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049057306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045964383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078188714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011964309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100004783","doi":"10.1017/s0959270913000178","title":"Molecular phylogeny of the South American sheldgeese with implications for conservation of Falkland Islands (Malvinas) and continental populations of the Ruddy-headed Goose<i>Chloephaga rubidiceps</i>and Upland Goose<i>C. picta</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; International Development Research Centre; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Population; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Endangered species; Zoology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.011649892308606196,"score_gpt":0.22759689220229107,"score_spread":0.21594699989368488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100004783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99382687,0.000066556226,0.0020321985,0.0029758336,0.00009910478,0.00050878804,0.00037783413,0.000005359189,0.00010746233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99808466,0.000015697256,0.0010234015,0.00052887056,0.000028342587,0.000036998223,0.00014568698,0.000011904401,0.00012446217],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919814,0.0000463812,0.00031307345,0.00019110217,0.00015970512,0.00009158898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998759,0.000037733327,0.00048105244,0.00023654783,0.00045318817,0.00003251204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000077314406,0.00011771817,0.00014922618,0.000047958012,0.000100324025,0.00001925974,0.00020437135,0.000070044574,0.000010204139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000093187795,0.000083287574,0.00007111438,0.00014033925,0.00033744916,0.000015225063,0.00009721344,0.00004977929,1.9983639e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000696549,0.000022775614,0.78486645,0.00002067095,0.00007202735,1.4911672e-8,0.00016727358,0.00006335394,0.21171631,0.002359346,0.00039628305,0.0002458203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009792042,0.00008668876,0.9654176,0.000024666379,0.000057827212,0.000008475092,0.00021158726,0.0003443946,0.03115831,0.00063240126,0.0009865084,0.00009230821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043825735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003056646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.180558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000066366038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065220825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33963686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105217428","doi":"10.1017/s095927090999030x","title":"Threats of environmental mercury to birds: knowledge gaps and priorities for future research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Mercury (programming language); Wildlife; Ecology; Trophic level; Biology; Geography; Fishery; Zoology","score_opus":0.055845836461589624,"score_gpt":0.36031084412754216,"score_spread":0.3044650076659525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105217428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825797,0.0005242327,0.00031533602,0.011378878,0.00029221846,0.0004061557,0.00008235095,0.000036117126,0.0043850094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99408746,0.00037736914,0.0016399202,0.00071655255,0.00017715868,0.000044373126,0.00000957521,0.000009673972,0.0029379367],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990685,0.00003508603,0.00021654616,0.0002006907,0.00032885902,0.00015034786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995799,0.00014576368,0.00005653764,0.000101707876,0.000045557495,0.00007050249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035979835,0.00008866295,0.00010454702,0.00010249468,0.00014056957,0.000026431802,0.00013973367,0.000044511213,0.0004381272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008638714,0.000083736304,0.00003337132,0.00012980998,0.00015236913,0.00020542677,0.0000824807,0.00006032957,0.00008341906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034567356,0.00028802018,0.54908085,0.00003669491,0.0000965967,0.0000015754877,0.010959993,0.00001852337,0.17582196,0.030637465,0.048631474,0.18408117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047667662,0.00021011425,0.9103868,0.000027872416,0.000007419152,0.0000047079648,0.001173554,0.00017647391,0.0051949825,0.008465038,0.07374057,0.00013580073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029178023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000072290764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36130592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097351236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017196586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47971857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109288385","doi":"10.1017/s095927091300018x","title":"Positive association between rat abundance and breeding success of the Critically Endangered Mariana Crow <i>Corvus kubaryi</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, Australian Government; University of Cambridge; Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Critically endangered; Endangered species; Nest (protein structural motif); Biology; Abundance (ecology); Predation; Ecology; Population; Reproductive success; Habitat; Zoology; Demography","score_opus":0.011242047983997548,"score_gpt":0.23399943537671838,"score_spread":0.22275738739272083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109288385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97467816,0.00000955251,0.00021561359,0.022046883,0.0002718979,0.0001668948,0.000020901338,0.000029620818,0.0025605059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99721944,0.0000087093895,0.0003234924,0.0015401928,0.000044180557,0.00002880286,0.0000038752764,0.000007978779,0.0008233046],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992109,0.0000457707,0.00021110728,0.00015646343,0.0002596984,0.00011606354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937445,0.00026231256,0.00016350613,0.00006031207,0.00011239995,0.000026993552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016088254,0.000076920674,0.00009815126,0.000018750161,0.00017029094,0.00003794531,0.00018136461,0.000067586094,0.00075292465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027543408,0.000063181484,0.000034692268,0.00009316713,0.00020452251,0.00034050306,0.00018538396,0.000091447735,0.00007702276],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072903513,0.000019292307,0.9871434,0.0000018892694,0.000028144665,3.1734547e-7,0.00012267222,0.0000017059097,0.006988804,0.000910375,0.0039248327,0.00085127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019978912,0.000028479344,0.9964272,0.000012620657,0.000023148936,0.0000016862092,0.0000544112,0.00017061584,0.0015203054,0.0007990779,0.0006943948,0.00006827846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013344733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005739993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022541333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016218614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000117469235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8243997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109392973","doi":"10.1017/s0959270913000592","title":"An analysis of monthly home range size in the critically endangered California Condor<i>Gymnogyps californianus</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management; U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game; California Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Home range; Critically endangered; Endangered species; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Geography; Annual cycle; Biology; Habitat; Zoology","score_opus":0.008823306395850317,"score_gpt":0.23517537622407558,"score_spread":0.22635206982822526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109392973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98344404,0.000004263417,0.002393046,0.011718597,0.00016516612,0.00017105635,0.0001635746,0.000043199554,0.0018970383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859382,0.0000030375704,0.0007355057,0.012989689,0.000050861963,0.00007082837,0.0001297522,0.000010909088,0.00007124038],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982763,0.00031354203,0.0004941115,0.00028605477,0.00044662133,0.0001833895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856687,0.00082416,0.00017657851,0.00029404045,0.00008506139,0.000053278753],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000982845,0.00012915966,0.00021539743,0.00014295254,0.00008744107,0.000038128353,0.0005247203,0.00010619283,0.0019772355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006754755,0.00010880421,0.00009954178,0.0006083719,0.00023462025,0.00027962844,0.000048297275,0.00012922238,0.00016261646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007159183,0.00014900844,0.9928247,0.000002537015,0.00007204467,0.0000025603297,0.00034529672,0.0014651748,0.0005319125,0.0027408982,0.00141913,0.0003751712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005022456,0.000046432982,0.90916264,0.0000044014373,0.00009347103,0.0000019198872,0.00011731109,0.081384316,0.00003805341,0.0013522097,0.0071834666,0.00011355643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025242337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010413588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083662055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010444841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023999215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117425746","doi":"10.1017/s0959270902002186","title":"Habitat mapping for bird conservation in North America","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Geological Survey; University of Arkansas; Nature Conservancy; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation","keywords":"Geography; Wildlife; Habitat; Bird conservation; Land cover; Environmental resource management; Habitat conservation; Wildlife conservation; Land use; Environmental planning; Ecology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.029172955194776133,"score_gpt":0.22230680888026358,"score_spread":0.19313385368548744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117425746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9331662,0.000021087377,0.01580417,0.042282715,0.00057181326,0.0005793816,0.000026149568,0.00021216077,0.007336291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97845876,0.0000634223,0.005122821,0.013019484,0.00013138323,0.0002473546,0.000063951404,0.00003361029,0.002859223],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989614,0.000024970921,0.00030740935,0.00025705062,0.00027854147,0.00017064111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958485,0.00010042535,0.00012696648,0.000119885124,0.000028512886,0.00003933504],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012348033,0.000108958484,0.000098468205,0.000111275076,0.00008036759,0.00005412171,0.00021250865,0.000033996395,0.0012451262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097680386,0.000111313624,0.000050018647,0.00030445395,0.000067649664,0.00031458153,0.00006662711,0.000057830748,0.0007448771],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014162455,0.00006907101,0.92274344,0.000005806362,0.000012714673,0.0000021280719,0.00023572483,0.0007034034,0.00012292455,0.00035039303,0.06607441,0.009665793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052818,0.000020050227,0.59167594,0.000010497194,0.0000027763392,9.752756e-7,0.00006620744,0.085990846,0.0000068416334,0.00026115548,0.32132804,0.000108463624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084432616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045464323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3310675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001498904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000046136424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118110486","doi":"10.1017/s0959270911000013","title":"Revised population estimate and trends for the Endangered Northern Rockhopper Penguin <i>Eudyptes moseleyi</i> at Tristan da Cunha","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Killam Trusts; Dalhousie University; European Commission; Royal Society; University of Cape Town; Royal Zoological Society of Scotland","keywords":"Endangered species; Geography; Census; Population; Ecology; Demography; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.05547022153938735,"score_gpt":0.2755741737860861,"score_spread":0.22010395224669876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118110486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815829,0.00010071512,0.0012805538,0.0055976426,0.00042269996,0.00033478808,0.0002603398,0.00013240185,0.010287994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99546367,0.000048206708,0.0004923962,0.0010590041,0.00005617726,0.00013813749,0.0003867497,0.000021499885,0.0023341384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903554,0.000023834733,0.00026797262,0.0002458239,0.00027270228,0.00015412406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994663,0.00010342389,0.00016469257,0.00015390867,0.000057762423,0.000053905474],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019119332,0.00012786388,0.000096502685,0.000037758873,0.00026283227,0.0000670079,0.0002003648,0.00005068221,0.019513413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011312733,0.000101466176,0.00006186791,0.00013413836,0.00009572299,0.00020508765,0.00010274975,0.000047315116,0.00019238365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020640003,0.000068836205,0.94957197,0.0000070998576,0.000038931164,0.000001095519,0.0006122333,0.000013175495,0.0015852212,0.0034889465,0.027300674,0.017105445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062350195,0.000029022167,0.9076234,0.000006505684,0.00002220628,0.0000073574365,0.00017913016,0.003847895,0.00032709635,0.00023862087,0.086964466,0.00013080229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001243734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063287313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059663795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035924403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004755263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9813829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123396233","doi":"10.1017/s0959270913000440","title":"Trends in territory occupancy, distribution and density of the Bearded Vulture<i>Gypaetus barbatus meridionalis</i>in southern Africa","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cascades (Canada)","funders":"Sasol","keywords":"Occupancy; Vulture; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Population; Population density; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Limiting; Accipitridae; Biology; Demography; Predation","score_opus":0.01045122951391676,"score_gpt":0.214871846634522,"score_spread":0.20442061712060525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123396233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99632174,0.000010479561,0.000030739386,0.0026701621,0.00016515929,0.00010327161,0.000044314293,0.000012177591,0.00064196886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99845475,0.000002586911,0.000077441095,0.00020885096,0.000015224276,0.00003432346,0.0000342224,0.000004528433,0.001168044],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927264,0.00006339858,0.00021543357,0.00015785679,0.00018400946,0.00010667841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997272,0.000038560116,0.00009824261,0.000092443224,0.000019328116,0.000024233292],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012255137,0.00007301673,0.000081260034,0.000039136215,0.000040614395,0.000010286308,0.00014956642,0.00007443626,0.0013384579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004093847,0.00005784852,0.000031912678,0.00014857856,0.00018420116,0.00017356963,0.00009343229,0.00010402407,0.000059061218],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014760114,0.00006121862,0.992996,8.360588e-7,0.0000033595081,8.4996213e-7,0.0002544084,0.000012746715,0.002906716,0.000112794376,0.002198763,0.0014375992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032128658,0.000009310066,0.9967375,0.000008753147,0.000003940685,0.0000039423953,0.00010431739,0.00031266225,0.0003156843,0.00037662336,0.0017442029,0.00006181167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021849063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045357966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003741517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001187083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010853959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132755066","doi":"10.1017/s095927091000016x","title":"Observations on the behavioural ecology of the Atiu Swiftlet <i>Aerodramus sawtelli</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; University of Calgary; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Human echolocation; Foraging; Cave; Ecology; Endangered species; Geography; Population; Biology; Zoology; Habitat","score_opus":0.05221292091403799,"score_gpt":0.27693602892997987,"score_spread":0.2247231080159419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132755066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746168,0.000005883534,0.000085944805,0.02312476,0.0006414745,0.0001847821,0.000037449357,0.000016242195,0.0012866386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99209136,0.000011228407,0.0003564816,0.0059809103,0.00009993987,0.00005481589,0.00007974981,0.000014327546,0.0013111656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992224,0.00008003422,0.0002570788,0.00015088006,0.00019548227,0.00009411504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989075,0.000088963454,0.00018623426,0.000485765,0.000306218,0.000025300269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020184147,0.00009417287,0.0000661502,0.000024845951,0.00015792604,0.000023714727,0.0007099685,0.00011128005,0.00026240398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033304328,0.00006147262,0.00009813785,0.000098924174,0.00021863323,0.0000069386865,0.0001600035,0.00021576916,0.000026015054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038672606,0.00011826475,0.47691557,0.0000010900405,0.000021984328,1.340211e-7,0.000028692126,0.000006250682,0.47018632,0.044579785,0.0077914363,0.00031180002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002052909,0.0000613447,0.888366,0.000004932442,0.00001168419,0.000005239737,0.00003863426,0.0001316267,0.046127535,0.00021487982,0.064755455,0.00007737383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011451018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013849329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4240588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000104924875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000088860856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28731394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140130833","doi":"10.1017/s0959270904000127","title":"The significance of Southwest Greenland as winter quarters for seabirds","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eider; Geography; Arctic; The arctic; Seabird; Mainland; Fishery; Ecology; Oceanography; Biology; Predation; Geology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.014996669619465205,"score_gpt":0.256145682641826,"score_spread":0.2411490130223608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140130833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98262787,0.0000029200091,0.005474657,0.010241251,0.0004342286,0.00026489803,0.0000295703,0.000029572027,0.0008950537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969097,0.000002056059,0.00066226587,0.0007838182,0.00004011315,0.00009708189,0.0000102964705,0.000008559022,0.0014861193],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940205,0.000014413567,0.00018984816,0.00013291351,0.00015870262,0.00010207012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996106,0.000112582966,0.00011481725,0.000099309844,0.000037407575,0.000025274303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015611481,0.000062225736,0.000055094668,0.000016165555,0.00011817591,0.000016512897,0.00022671418,0.000041716197,0.00043168414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006588109,0.000047925703,0.000048191963,0.000053504802,0.00023669518,0.00012233487,0.00003095082,0.00004483815,0.0001819541],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090370275,0.000049753253,0.99171835,0.0000015681222,0.000016074648,8.687967e-7,0.00023047513,0.00015679425,0.0022945527,0.002223153,0.0017560701,0.0014619867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000642805,0.000089549874,0.97653943,0.0000064106753,0.000009025313,0.0000052876658,0.00016420854,0.00008461046,0.0017480915,0.004125686,0.016512986,0.00007188654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028220992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017541513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015178882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008571234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030313266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47266388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141455098","doi":"10.1017/s0959270907000780","title":"Are saltflats suitable supplementary nesting habitats for Malaysian Plovers <i>Charadrius peronii</i> threatened by beach habitat loss in Thailand?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Charadrius; Threatened species; Nest (protein structural motif); Fishery; Habitat; Plover; Hatching; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.023257938572439116,"score_gpt":0.27280090548448016,"score_spread":0.24954296691204103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141455098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97387,0.000011194513,0.002416098,0.009639004,0.000303295,0.00060682476,0.00026694126,0.00006264327,0.012824001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895422,0.000012080547,0.002348452,0.0026021919,0.0001070184,0.000117231975,0.0007950513,0.000042378033,0.004433436],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981818,0.000031502826,0.00040659725,0.00038839804,0.00053524727,0.00045641806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992414,0.0002621718,0.00017522913,0.0001621565,0.00005530529,0.000103698745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067827996,0.00016398738,0.00015028227,0.000098798446,0.00013137868,0.000082013685,0.00035795185,0.00008177913,0.0030008007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016826944,0.00017172402,0.000059445876,0.00022949523,0.000119853925,0.00043365895,0.0001781361,0.00015766165,0.000049681737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019212467,0.00008519161,0.95758915,0.000010768729,0.00001861557,0.000018951714,0.00012102047,0.00005775227,0.001315026,0.00021620255,0.038629785,0.0017454175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016567827,0.00007289922,0.855637,0.000016843429,0.0000059357008,0.000012071869,0.00038534886,0.004828624,0.00067010924,0.00052511255,0.13594209,0.00024717857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033335732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011835614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10195213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040872348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024897232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146144201","doi":"10.1017/s095927090600061x","title":"Vines and canopy contact: a route for snake predation on parrot nests","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Windsor Clinical Research","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Yale University; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Arboreal locomotion; Nest (protein structural motif); Predation; Canopy; Biology; Ecology; Tree canopy; Endangered species; Bird nest; Habitat","score_opus":0.03026647928435759,"score_gpt":0.2950100839583617,"score_spread":0.2647436046740041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146144201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96815234,0.00000834536,0.012555843,0.015207134,0.00039450586,0.0002998648,0.000023015755,0.00010236244,0.003256596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872092,0.000009687083,0.0012636314,0.009301042,0.00010264291,0.000062365216,0.00009161013,0.000014119223,0.0019457074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990427,0.00001875352,0.00028829888,0.00026840216,0.00022590165,0.00015596303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993274,0.00026813312,0.00015064208,0.00011747692,0.00007218743,0.000064146116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003263771,0.000117458614,0.00009658217,0.00008917934,0.0001419282,0.0000447718,0.00014417013,0.00008257344,0.0006440498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028153817,0.00011487174,0.00003998372,0.000102164595,0.00008935294,0.0002743491,0.000041310097,0.000063077016,0.00010284235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024221072,0.000056731198,0.9600339,0.000004176718,0.00003261529,0.0000019598422,0.00013242029,0.000048712704,0.0040702918,0.019331817,0.01071032,0.005334877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006834694,0.00007191439,0.89953506,0.000012363605,0.000015871216,0.000007802605,0.00007010477,0.0030640133,0.0014980928,0.0012339434,0.093677655,0.00012971071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052294816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020935233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08296733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010590577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023608582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70518935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158970303","doi":"10.1017/s095927090999013x","title":"The ‘Near Threatened’ Bearded Screech-owl<i>Megascops barbarus</i>: diet pattern and trophic assessment using δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>15</sup>N stable-isotopes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Trophic level; δ13C; δ15N; Feather; Ecology; Threatened species; Predation; Stable isotope ratio; Biology; Tyto; Habitat; Zoology","score_opus":0.014752589327586201,"score_gpt":0.2569785586585639,"score_spread":0.2422259693309777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158970303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98371315,0.000095628944,0.003414141,0.010664999,0.00010019435,0.00040808422,0.000028832976,0.00008564854,0.0014893475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99019665,0.00024371487,0.0041996655,0.0044575203,0.00011840313,0.00004806277,0.000039600684,0.000032569784,0.00066384114],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976076,0.00020716673,0.00052497716,0.0005957064,0.00065475015,0.0004098378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989085,0.00027171135,0.00024595868,0.00036716985,0.0000979577,0.00010868098],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006789049,0.0002906321,0.00028185188,0.00009510239,0.0006973067,0.00043912843,0.0004636306,0.00013454568,0.00092991785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013623537,0.00024253968,0.000082677354,0.0002449969,0.0004670446,0.0006162811,0.00031943418,0.00025039806,0.000078548095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013282167,0.00012636144,0.9602984,0.000006648714,0.00017957122,0.000020525618,0.00043303406,0.02063939,0.0013725805,0.0010565802,0.0030620464,0.01267203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008199295,0.00017663822,0.5327318,0.0000232707,0.00005971221,0.000033200078,0.00020184569,0.4511946,0.000080409096,0.0013806253,0.013035889,0.00026209152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013548891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067892566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43055522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027700124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000660062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169622091","doi":"10.1017/s0959270914000318","title":"Breeding ecology and predictors of nest success in the Critically Endangered Ridgway’s Hawk<i>Buteo ridgwayi</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales","keywords":"Buteo; Nest (protein structural motif); Fledge; Ecology; Endangered species; Geography; Critically endangered; Avian clutch size; Biology; Habitat; Predation; Reproduction","score_opus":0.012482805246059428,"score_gpt":0.24011850574556506,"score_spread":0.22763570049950563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169622091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98862493,0.0000028180034,0.0004415459,0.008590489,0.00037220435,0.000121591525,0.000011516506,0.000021553606,0.0018133642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969327,0.0000047903823,0.0003102255,0.002545339,0.00006400647,0.000035296744,0.000010677228,0.000006738314,0.00009022169],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991348,0.00009438344,0.0002586872,0.00017764578,0.00020475074,0.00012975103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994121,0.00033682844,0.00009107807,0.000097178396,0.000032965552,0.000029854928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045595624,0.00007824797,0.00009750265,0.000051376497,0.00006788241,0.000019860232,0.00028385647,0.000078782345,0.00049614627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030104286,0.000064673564,0.000023425622,0.0001040452,0.00034702613,0.00020785216,0.00009034054,0.000107730484,0.00004007813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017802846,0.000069058435,0.9945069,0.0000027505394,0.0000049136265,0.0000024015503,0.00021241482,0.00001790391,0.0013929501,0.0017300532,0.0013037083,0.000739166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037328483,0.000070224676,0.99496627,0.0000069120947,0.000009615094,0.000018228844,0.0000906412,0.00083404576,0.00023144178,0.0005242213,0.0028108207,0.00006427685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002897602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002897634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008307788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049274793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012565938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5432454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516843385","doi":"10.1017/s0959270915000350","title":"Long-term data indicates that supplementary food enhances the number of breeding pairs in a Cape Vulture<i>Gyps coprotheres</i>colony","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cascades (Canada)","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Robert Bosch Stiftung","keywords":"Vulture; Nest (protein structural motif); Population; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Fishery; Demography","score_opus":0.043112550648442105,"score_gpt":0.29175069028963946,"score_spread":0.24863813964119735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516843385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898406,0.0000072556422,0.00021306446,0.008848673,0.0002329958,0.0002501269,0.00021709567,0.000018632414,0.00037151642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981312,0.000023627237,0.00027274896,0.00082995894,0.000042394273,0.00007442776,0.000078939986,0.00001000069,0.00053668447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899805,0.000056841927,0.00025874292,0.00025481364,0.00028595544,0.00014558015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993604,0.00018202001,0.00019605388,0.00022077434,0.000015615462,0.000025149433],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032052438,0.0000961322,0.00009097756,0.00003132138,0.00006817021,0.000016279142,0.000759562,0.00006292151,0.015569441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005402169,0.000059793503,0.0000249337,0.000100011915,0.00029630694,0.0003825045,0.00031974493,0.00007838022,0.0001750216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036322224,0.00008331673,0.9839491,0.0000024927015,0.000023830453,0.0000024439673,0.00016270707,5.461859e-7,0.009678212,0.000117717245,0.004174785,0.0017684767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052439806,0.00003566158,0.9896104,0.00003421975,0.00001047147,0.000011080339,0.00009624527,0.000015176936,0.0069488664,0.00025646275,0.0023719463,0.0000850781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041026226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011491185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015394419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009340388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021853632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98533046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549602553","doi":"10.1017/s0959270916000241","title":"Distribution and habitat associations of the critically endangered bird species of São Tomé Island (Gulf of Guinea)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Trent University; Nottingham Trent University","keywords":"Critically endangered; Endangered species; Ibis; Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Biodiversity; Population; Range (aeronautics); Minimum viable population; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.03052560753323041,"score_gpt":0.25432349317371583,"score_spread":0.22379788564048542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549602553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808991,0.000011971701,0.0021281517,0.011640323,0.0002381413,0.00012015259,0.0020666157,0.000024159934,0.0028714042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991965,0.000036216334,0.00006496871,0.00015632866,0.000020153011,0.000008847607,0.00004867552,0.0000069411244,0.00046134036],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899083,0.000039829632,0.00035598048,0.00012311563,0.00039908674,0.00009116738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991727,0.00020912578,0.0002651984,0.0001311616,0.00019431153,0.000027508717],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017012967,0.000072128874,0.00011696327,0.000024176343,0.000048265847,0.000010240758,0.00018455597,0.0000488718,0.005518013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008197389,0.000048862108,0.00006617067,0.00015234141,0.00038371515,0.00014623707,0.00012120133,0.000030126443,0.000023234688],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019570627,0.00006941216,0.90406746,0.0000069839552,0.000021043534,1.0630133e-7,0.000086027154,0.0000012439413,0.057199556,0.02881297,0.009394036,0.00032157026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041295378,0.00002294619,0.97731537,0.00002923979,0.000012152141,0.0000013669148,0.00016532541,0.000060387625,0.0141063845,0.0008025181,0.0070159193,0.00005546374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025325074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00194361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07324786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019696217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017783263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594882929","doi":"10.1017/s0959270916000678","title":"A global threats overview for Numeniini populations: synthesising expert knowledge for a group of declining migratory birds","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Flyway; Threatened species; Geography; Endangered species; Ecology; Fishery; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.15099776565349482,"score_gpt":0.40368957722775367,"score_spread":0.25269181157425885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594882929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96803623,0.00024286128,0.02633367,0.0023713787,0.0012390699,0.0006791573,0.0001397769,0.0000725601,0.0008853108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97764355,0.000022284716,0.02111536,0.00041862365,0.00010951368,0.0003411643,0.000028533897,0.000016244932,0.00030469638],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909866,0.000024711311,0.000344919,0.00024920612,0.00013931324,0.0001431702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991071,0.0001825999,0.00036684924,0.00022910842,0.00007387224,0.000040431627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003145043,0.00011013481,0.00014929395,0.00003204238,0.00038210454,0.000047949758,0.0003780502,0.00009815091,0.00029629722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042177716,0.00011148236,0.00012234117,0.000043439177,0.00016439133,0.0004170439,0.00010198311,0.000029156363,0.00003053628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079812715,0.00013371915,0.9714248,0.000010424646,0.000023483744,3.4940336e-7,0.000103342405,0.000006730835,0.000519082,0.006982001,0.0021884467,0.0185278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007168555,0.00005748556,0.9783541,0.00006968974,0.000028428316,0.0000034525476,0.000049585895,0.0023499376,0.00027967576,0.008083644,0.0098790685,0.00012809949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001883002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031553628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0183997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001755886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034139397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45461187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766848317","doi":"10.1017/s0959270917000296","title":"Major stopover regions and migratory bottlenecks for Nearctic-Neotropical landbirds within the Neotropics: a review","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Hawk Mountain Sanctuary Association","keywords":"Geography; Nearctic ecozone; Ecology; Panama; Peninsula; Biology; Taxonomy (biology)","score_opus":0.0886440102895926,"score_gpt":0.3629751710771986,"score_spread":0.274331160787606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766848317","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014747212,0.98627985,0.00036803816,0.009743489,0.0010500118,0.0016969475,0.00012202754,0.000071279734,0.00052089046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000039382434,0.9890211,0.0007189296,0.0033195033,0.00023272511,0.00072276324,0.00008672953,0.000040575072,0.005818284],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985321,0.00013081914,0.0005044965,0.00039693053,0.00026244795,0.00017320015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998573,0.00028198597,0.00060272746,0.0004254166,0.00004657657,0.000070282906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034192766,0.00024829243,0.0005100082,0.00003760169,0.00040713095,0.000084865875,0.0006405321,0.00022331139,0.00062330207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042904957,0.000167119,0.00023833747,0.000059951428,0.00045069735,0.00018039314,0.00021995485,0.0003047667,0.00027469543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050598443,0.00019420662,0.11900084,0.004913977,0.0004349101,0.000029001842,0.00012714458,0.0000010814015,0.0000012287654,0.010408897,0.3040622,0.56077594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020519701,0.000033827208,0.011144434,0.0025475519,0.00041304625,0.000073703806,0.0000048786974,0.000022470596,1.2798512e-7,0.0003908429,0.9849748,0.00018909635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000100492674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007821273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6809126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001653723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012713707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68247205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893329476","doi":"10.1017/s0959270918000229","title":"Over-winter ecology and relative density of Canada Warbler <i>Cardellina canadensis</i> in Colombia: the basis for defining conservation priorities for a sharply declining long-distance migrant","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Warbler; Flock; Foraging; Cloud forest; Biology","score_opus":0.01643509958589567,"score_gpt":0.24602669637624744,"score_spread":0.22959159679035177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893329476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870967,0.000013501356,0.0037809133,0.007952375,0.00044422317,0.00048113443,0.0001221309,0.000011545266,0.000097457065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936995,0.000004511411,0.0018217099,0.0037132867,0.000033380493,0.00015001577,0.000021246618,0.000011763452,0.00054456765],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989618,0.000051725965,0.000381382,0.00025306898,0.0001597457,0.00019228911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983648,0.0010940472,0.00024899025,0.00009633271,0.00016303381,0.00003280959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041011025,0.00010802427,0.00016289049,0.000038679136,0.0002115772,0.000014845816,0.00015383592,0.00009269138,0.00014374354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005429837,0.00009971048,0.000037760714,0.00009575464,0.000361801,0.00018184078,0.000063732274,0.00008936713,0.0000021392582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002091861,0.000017670478,0.98797274,0.0000073768906,0.000026881733,0.0000016976066,0.00047916576,0.000026054222,0.00019352802,0.00092253706,0.009967795,0.00017538064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071609265,0.00009626661,0.9869495,0.000033031945,0.000026983349,0.000006191922,0.00018722723,0.0051911934,0.0005272353,0.0006070758,0.0055547087,0.00010449136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094920315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9712482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87632793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003549814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025556306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9111067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936692610","doi":"10.1017/s0959270918000333","title":"Assessments of Maleo <i>Macrocephalon maleo</i> nesting grounds in South-east Sulawesi reveal severely threatened populations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia","keywords":"Threatened species; Geography; Endangered species; Wildlife; Overexploitation; Grassroots; Population; Deforestation (computer science); Nesting (process); Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Demography; Political science","score_opus":0.031023146094601266,"score_gpt":0.27286821061851174,"score_spread":0.24184506452391047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936692610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98824614,0.0000057753277,0.0007509882,0.0019074966,0.00059643853,0.00030616927,0.000020057541,0.00006531895,0.008101609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923085,0.0000018436903,0.0031326904,0.0012393064,0.000048299848,0.00004274061,0.00010857223,0.000021617678,0.0030964538],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983151,0.0000903819,0.0005888738,0.0003621038,0.0004245558,0.00021897735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991938,0.00009517239,0.00037515568,0.00020810969,0.00008022816,0.00004751747],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039375806,0.00016148332,0.00018810328,0.00013230433,0.00008262603,0.00003429883,0.00031274854,0.0001314105,0.0018776093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009389208,0.00017985384,0.00006369424,0.0003897252,0.00008868219,0.0007007939,0.00012822599,0.00015170834,0.0004216409],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103571496,0.00008934684,0.993536,0.000009196928,0.000017124257,0.000003336338,0.00020186233,0.0011411188,0.0012276105,0.0028722996,0.00041427193,0.00038427848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088718924,0.00004703271,0.9839526,0.00004397482,0.0000104611145,0.000012163494,0.00011359244,0.012578113,0.00006398926,0.0017278221,0.0003937787,0.0001693184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009460514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013053479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011436994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021267791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054523247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963901779","doi":"10.1017/s0959270919000248","title":"The world’s largest breeding colony of Leach’s Storm-petrel <i>Hydrobates leucorhous</i> has declined","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Department of Fisheries and Land Resources; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Burrow; Population; Geography; Habitat; Petrel; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Seabird; Predation","score_opus":0.01877153230084361,"score_gpt":0.24293084256653824,"score_spread":0.22415931026569463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963901779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846365,0.000013244701,0.000110288325,0.008551194,0.0010050482,0.00017993884,0.000011510558,0.0000589925,0.0054332903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802194,0.000008508656,0.00034128173,0.0009939418,0.0000500622,0.000024576704,0.000015791578,0.00001429539,0.018332116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900895,0.000037357207,0.0003055583,0.00019500696,0.00029166084,0.00016146542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925405,0.00028317174,0.00022311848,0.0001588034,0.000045352965,0.00003552381],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031285622,0.00009858039,0.00010230523,0.000048449838,0.00018648292,0.000040644274,0.00038236694,0.000059906986,0.00327329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000871112,0.00008004052,0.000057250007,0.00016853883,0.00026543147,0.00024362127,0.00013359684,0.00012472883,0.0011465655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048402868,0.00006124513,0.9788431,0.0000015006684,0.00001679598,0.000001693317,0.00005623308,0.00012181538,0.0052220467,0.001163847,0.013902317,0.0005610299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044878005,0.000052667812,0.89065856,0.000010077233,0.000009254061,0.0000075550292,0.000046781977,0.0014159001,0.0010164377,0.0002381395,0.105999745,0.00009609868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031058796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008768024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09209743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013727034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033341872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011287310","doi":"10.1017/s095927092000012x","title":"Effects of wind energy production on a threatened species, the Bicknell’s Thrush <i>Catharus bicknelli</i>, with and without mitigation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Thrush; Habitat; Wind power; Environmental science; Wildlife; Habitat destruction; Renewable energy; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.017949685109605137,"score_gpt":0.24416366127729908,"score_spread":0.22621397616769395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011287310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9476772,0.0001383861,0.0013498529,0.042889707,0.0007002525,0.00037687676,0.000006140208,0.00015852728,0.0067030718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944909,0.00036341988,0.00031493313,0.0025474827,0.0008073138,0.000042993972,0.000011978474,0.000022845383,0.0013981173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853635,0.0001473039,0.00022106303,0.00029592196,0.00064914685,0.00015020194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990182,0.00020898158,0.00027284294,0.00010182925,0.00032341204,0.00007475579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019680317,0.0001334503,0.00015080896,0.0000679612,0.00029568656,0.00009065429,0.00024754548,0.00007572034,0.00006609457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046751404,0.00010246693,0.00004154073,0.00041360172,0.0004342562,0.00030857325,0.000029640854,0.00008033983,0.0000058316627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012687844,0.00028750987,0.36846864,0.00008595517,0.00050741236,0.0000071347104,0.017950216,0.0015454151,0.039350238,0.5220336,0.011536634,0.036958482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004552872,0.00086676644,0.49067482,0.0005171123,0.00023409013,0.0000097517595,0.014414905,0.0025858001,0.18325987,0.014172588,0.28759506,0.0011163594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036756664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004328489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.507861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081007616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018312383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5556533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159760271","doi":"10.1017/s0959270921000150","title":"Climate change exposure of waterbird species in the African-Eurasian flyways","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Flyway; Ecology; Geography; Climate change; Threatened species; Habitat; Range (aeronautics); Species distribution; Context (archaeology); Biology","score_opus":0.05672921734451524,"score_gpt":0.2557043798595085,"score_spread":0.19897516251499325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159760271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8905324,0.00003227783,0.00003962596,0.025206262,0.00038259447,0.0001496557,0.00012773665,0.0000411614,0.083488286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698913,0.00014061968,0.00006290966,0.0022434136,0.00006156994,0.000061028622,0.000115534946,0.000008536209,0.00031723056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989167,0.00006539548,0.00026911503,0.00017726942,0.0004121826,0.00015936712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995859,0.000059596037,0.000106391686,0.00017270115,0.000050509345,0.000024851202],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002268933,0.00008756538,0.000092404895,0.000037395952,0.00005772876,0.000045839966,0.00028509603,0.00004139999,0.028820138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007292359,0.00006997303,0.00005497168,0.00030627532,0.00010998746,0.00020635834,0.00012298432,0.000073291754,0.0004102518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003379639,0.0001959707,0.93623936,0.000010783431,0.000010233654,0.000026959391,0.0022012368,0.0000053745002,0.008637242,0.04429602,0.0066696964,0.0016732953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002892786,0.000018000708,0.92680675,0.000014166334,0.0000038065373,0.000014356605,0.004129845,0.00012789275,0.0018001633,0.00019292241,0.066524245,0.0000785659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031041875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002540799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10645676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015275467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008373561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97206765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250360684","doi":"10.1017/s0959270915000210","title":"BCI volume 25 issue 3 Cover and Back matter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Computer science; Content (measure theory); Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.050977730128031716,"score_gpt":0.23689986007855524,"score_spread":0.1859221299505235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250360684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00062171725,0.0011341007,0.00030156836,0.005304115,0.017638512,0.00018035829,0.00303311,0.00001964815,0.9717669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00075551454,0.00051070005,0.00025718796,0.0035100516,0.00070841814,0.000030142128,0.00039358487,0.000040796327,0.9937936],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984358,0.000010683751,0.0006536657,0.0006142419,0.000075765245,0.0002098734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989107,0.00003313499,0.00055357406,0.00024780032,0.00017113067,0.00008365349],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033059172,0.00023721422,0.0004311535,0.00030759288,0.00008236496,0.00030478067,0.00033450002,0.00020212498,0.6373283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053753767,0.0002900239,0.00009394128,0.00009077699,0.00014998553,0.00037164948,0.0002284097,0.00014869281,0.9423154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013274751,0.00002108534,0.019681623,0.00002439048,0.00016776028,5.954862e-7,0.00015152601,0.000018600977,4.1135652e-7,0.00231984,0.9775611,0.000039792496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052349316,0.000011613584,0.004627452,0.000027807959,0.0000070308165,0.000003902432,0.000060030445,0.0014846122,0.0000010438066,0.0003945394,0.9925476,0.0003109015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007137462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000064618944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30498704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021636958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054270247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283713538","doi":"10.1017/s0959270922000053","title":"Space use and site fidelity in the endangered Northern Bald Ibis <i>Geronticus eremita</i>: Effects of age, season, and sex","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie; Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Wirtschaft; Universität Wien; Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Ibis; Endangered species; Geography; Seasonal breeder; Habitat; Ecology; Fidelity; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.01224239348813159,"score_gpt":0.2156857219056759,"score_spread":0.2034433284175443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283713538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927411,0.00003489154,0.00012846333,0.006472926,0.00013764069,0.00024732878,0.000019091016,0.000019486859,0.00019906317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959734,0.000017174867,0.00024968575,0.0032906272,0.000016278473,0.00007536185,0.000026418416,0.000007419124,0.00034361766],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989846,0.00021081677,0.00020341174,0.00021222487,0.00028650122,0.000102466496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991675,0.00052555936,0.00013343942,0.00012804469,0.000020621463,0.000024835103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043234904,0.00008625175,0.00009475703,0.000043152064,0.00013616675,0.000035544675,0.00015373177,0.000036526195,0.00017308816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025214552,0.00007923886,0.000022009257,0.00015743804,0.00013751967,0.00027339914,0.00017827544,0.00013123722,0.0000072481],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034807326,0.000058802107,0.99329734,0.00000693235,0.000011855166,0.000011486778,0.0012905115,0.000100371864,0.0012463687,0.0004319708,0.0028846906,0.0006248689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004744624,0.000042526233,0.9901053,0.0000065412773,0.000009881557,0.000014031502,0.00018006857,0.0024109415,0.00009372023,0.0004887577,0.006095698,0.00007811132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027818847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078909015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005109017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008562791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016846569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44033083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289878720","doi":"10.1017/s0959270922000181","title":"Global population and conservation status of the Great Black-backed Gull<i>Larus marinus</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Scottish Government; Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK; University of the Highlands and Islands","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Threatened species; Population; Near-threatened species; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Endangered species; Ecology; Fishery; Population size; Biology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.013169731200677225,"score_gpt":0.23767574836723532,"score_spread":0.2245060171665581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289878720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929296,0.000006380556,0.00011240534,0.004777324,0.00049163983,0.0002254232,0.00010882423,0.000035523877,0.0013128851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996254,0.000006253399,0.000280893,0.002190079,0.00001910878,0.000041913197,0.000081493716,0.000007988429,0.0011182587],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988814,0.0001061543,0.0002727121,0.00020553196,0.00038733223,0.0001468594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994948,0.00004952232,0.0002369303,0.00014812138,0.0000315279,0.000039085317],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016917936,0.00008940792,0.00008515758,0.000026490728,0.00023682539,0.000016918168,0.00021829,0.000044943266,0.0036989935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007821917,0.00008193919,0.000042013053,0.00023657193,0.0002247996,0.00019782287,0.00036257386,0.00008884542,0.000030732594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056832232,0.000050379957,0.9905027,0.0000018995391,0.000011380043,0.0000014160446,0.000076918914,0.00041518346,0.00030398267,0.0017082847,0.005525444,0.0013455846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045633782,0.000029769384,0.98054725,0.0000027989108,0.000016880893,0.000020154203,0.000076590375,0.0016861382,0.00005241956,0.0015212022,0.015507878,0.00008255628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028596788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025452676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009982433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038983478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032661075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99721175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294707582","doi":"10.1017/s0959270922000193","title":"Range-wide changes in the North American Tufted Puffin <i>Fratercula cirrhata</i> breeding population over 115 years","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; California Department of Fish and Wildlife; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; Strong","keywords":"Range (aeronautics); Population; Geography; Marine ecosystem; Ecosystem; Population decline; Fishery; Ecology; Bycatch; Oceanography; Biology; Fishing; Demography; Habitat; Geology","score_opus":0.016334465087996474,"score_gpt":0.23925272246091114,"score_spread":0.22291825737291468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294707582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921089,0.0000025612594,0.00003592122,0.0070566772,0.00030891687,0.00018715842,0.00003111858,0.000042261992,0.00022652543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918091,0.0000037653379,0.00010649924,0.007458349,0.000047586538,0.00015979543,0.00014143379,0.000011652555,0.00026179865],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894875,0.00012150818,0.00017927306,0.00020790462,0.00039872038,0.00014385163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996128,0.00009500997,0.00014415712,0.000117288735,0.000009669987,0.000021092204],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028036782,0.00008210323,0.00007839963,0.00008332669,0.00015373292,0.000032299988,0.00034216602,0.000019712705,0.002277778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004435281,0.00007876178,0.000029496585,0.00041967817,0.00008880803,0.0001831202,0.00015069546,0.00016472001,0.00008329779],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028226983,0.00006157594,0.99315715,4.892339e-7,0.000004726812,0.000014453977,0.0003814787,0.00041464233,0.0001787457,0.00005527384,0.0035917407,0.0021114796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002775855,0.00004331091,0.9880842,0.0000015233422,0.0000062968875,0.000010993881,0.00022136296,0.000907946,0.000006218792,0.000053684398,0.010293273,0.00009360159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025987823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0253651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022766318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024350281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009289961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323024866","doi":"10.1017/s0959270923000096","title":"Assessing the trade of Chinese Hwamei <i>Garrulax canorus</i> in the USA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"Riverbanks Zoo and Garden","keywords":"CITES; Songbird; Geography; Wildlife trade; Pangolin; International trade; Business; Ecology; Biology; Wildlife","score_opus":0.02589787649868427,"score_gpt":0.2970729233678211,"score_spread":0.27117504686913685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323024866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9494977,0.0000031030613,0.00011305581,0.046537507,0.00035131056,0.00014481094,0.0000047805615,0.000034162167,0.0033135726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99245673,0.000009028898,0.00008813523,0.007000001,0.000060349306,0.000059737227,0.000022864353,0.0000073851975,0.00029575088],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891454,0.0001777566,0.00028097638,0.00014881049,0.00035272754,0.00012517627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990787,0.00058867753,0.00014141842,0.00016458821,0.000013107606,0.0000134882475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093022245,0.00008025886,0.000073063966,0.000057321005,0.0001497269,0.000048851925,0.0004519157,0.000050905815,0.00056524505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028390042,0.000050495233,0.000042334766,0.0006347978,0.00016973139,0.0003680304,0.0000699156,0.00014914542,0.00021220947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006521592,0.00002757463,0.98830754,0.0000014504328,0.000007631242,0.000002716792,0.00065306626,0.0007508371,0.0006155702,0.0010918634,0.00790347,0.00063177955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020012802,0.000008355622,0.9813442,0.0000059920267,0.0000030908645,0.0000063033012,0.0002587219,0.008495051,0.000030030542,0.0016525981,0.0079403315,0.000055145512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015700986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060847546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04295905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058600264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034792072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6189037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375934319","doi":"10.1017/s0959270923000138","title":"Trends and population estimate of the threatened Buff-breasted Sandpiper<i>Calidris subruficollis</i>wintering in coastal grasslands of southern Brazil","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Social Fund; Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade; U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; BirdLife International","keywords":"Calidris; Sandpiper; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Distance sampling; Population; Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Threatened species; Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.0141437501630103,"score_gpt":0.2635825003878208,"score_spread":0.24943875022481046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4375934319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979398,0.0000023667922,0.000055507582,0.0013435927,0.0001467386,0.000072330266,0.00007627302,0.000032668595,0.00033069018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990678,0.000003836621,0.000094139235,0.000056760855,0.000009366738,0.0000140713555,0.000051695668,0.000009287028,0.00069304515],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992353,0.000039242077,0.00028791765,0.00014443482,0.00019676448,0.000096393676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996566,0.000050029244,0.00016104465,0.00009316631,0.000019827467,0.000019300105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016715632,0.0000768295,0.00010734092,0.00010821424,0.00004512827,0.000009597395,0.00014215626,0.000059489816,0.0004433071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041953565,0.00006181332,0.00003954988,0.00035797752,0.00013025035,0.00011950734,0.00012795467,0.000056772587,0.000022122664],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048318852,0.000034123463,0.9877584,0.0000036463705,0.000007666992,0.0000013124575,0.00022923292,0.00028428057,0.00813892,0.000059817085,0.00011179328,0.0033224865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049702916,0.000018063593,0.99340326,0.00002556253,0.000009019339,0.000006111875,0.00008831586,0.004662686,0.00094036467,0.00022905946,0.00006295469,0.00005758183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016179045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008449485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071985554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034950634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008256529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4853902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390914937","doi":"10.1017/s0959270923000308","title":"Northward migration of Red Knots <i>Calidris canutus rufa</i> and environment connectivity of southern Brazil to Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Calidris; Bay; Geography; Bird migration; Circumpolar star; Ecology; Amazon rainforest; Fishery; Habitat; Oceanography; Biology; Archaeology; Geology","score_opus":0.007739351075738462,"score_gpt":0.21322357984561374,"score_spread":0.2054842287698753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390914937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99184746,0.000015806361,0.0007072326,0.0066962703,0.0002161506,0.00013350714,0.0001776364,0.000017495462,0.00018845152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836403,0.000008162819,0.00036397664,0.0006633536,0.000019321398,0.000020529891,0.000022317945,0.000008178436,0.00053013535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992294,0.000028763598,0.00022895022,0.0001882346,0.00024574136,0.00007896009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996979,0.00007768262,0.00007641778,0.00008496794,0.000016739565,0.00004627156],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000112240494,0.00007428438,0.00009091074,0.00003698366,0.000033105447,0.000008900071,0.00009274503,0.000043072836,0.0010106636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034292912,0.00007417163,0.000023247168,0.00007996569,0.00008655629,0.000074338925,0.000066920584,0.000050571365,0.00004071622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028446078,0.000033784534,0.9684681,0.0000075511975,0.000019419871,0.000004151366,0.00027313456,0.0002209877,0.021861894,0.00007310833,0.0049134507,0.004095971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013895895,0.00003808657,0.96345973,0.00001657657,0.000015163127,0.0000052201176,0.000090525304,0.00094163005,0.005837526,0.00011643623,0.029258331,0.00008180942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2661487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7225608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4564121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018530898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070634145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404979294","doi":"10.1017/s0959270924000297","title":"Poisonous pitohuis as pets","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Bee Products Chemical Analysis","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional; People's Trust for Endangered Species; Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia; International Primate Protection League; National Geographic Society; Columbus Zoo and Aquarium; National Geographic Society Education Foundation","keywords":"Zoology; Geography; Traditional medicine; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.012237593924312706,"score_gpt":0.22684189861843895,"score_spread":0.21460430469412625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404979294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9053595,0.00019335847,0.000023785004,0.08879873,0.0006344901,0.000057519315,0.000022681777,0.00039404785,0.0045159073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927126,0.00003842461,0.00014801619,0.0019191912,0.0007147751,0.00001732678,0.00010657347,0.0000014985309,0.00434157],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915177,0.000017471573,0.00018044784,0.00027325173,0.00026640535,0.00011066046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995969,0.00014653988,0.000033936794,0.000036273286,0.00013890114,0.000047430432],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000107304855,0.000084390245,0.000071025155,0.000023062505,0.000058731566,0.00018254976,0.00022803035,0.00004967361,0.004324747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001361399,0.000035323512,0.00008515123,0.00032067014,0.000032222204,0.00019812731,0.000051206043,0.00008490677,0.0014127413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034674642,0.00010362405,0.03167977,0.000012719482,0.00019361232,0.000031167805,0.00010303681,0.0000056456834,0.71461844,0.033341564,0.05082018,0.16905555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007642404,0.000047437294,0.06356532,0.00004133237,0.000026110238,0.00004268972,0.00007090042,0.0042346176,0.017071694,0.011201849,0.9033803,0.00024135502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007891511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022902327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8525601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042522002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014202727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405727600","doi":"10.1017/s0959270924000248","title":"Status assessment and conservation priorities for a circumpolar raptor: the Snowy Owl <i>Bubo scandiacus</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Cryospheric studies and observations","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Northern Studies; University of Saskatchewan; Université Laval; Université de Montréal; Université de Moncton; McGill University; Ste. Anne's Hospital; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Natural Resources Canada; Miljødirektoratet; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Institut Polaire Français Paul Emile Victor; Klima- og miljødepartementet; ArcticNet; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Polar Knowledge Canada; Hawk Mountain Sanctuary Association","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Circumpolar star; Geography; Population; Ecology; Conservation status; Fishery; Biology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.028975108854408148,"score_gpt":0.2825150425061523,"score_spread":0.25353993365174415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405727600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8283773,0.0075046304,0.0204347,0.12916715,0.0072065853,0.0015457367,0.0018372774,0.0005521397,0.003374442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98641413,0.0012835853,0.0036633438,0.006505777,0.00061257795,0.00008620253,0.0004719626,0.000016527289,0.00094586704],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881566,0.000042209438,0.00031861922,0.00027864086,0.00032506665,0.00021980732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853647,0.0009723283,0.0000855696,0.00012377974,0.00022283402,0.000059032238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038302128,0.00014303085,0.00012359374,0.00006013824,0.0004142143,0.0004495773,0.00015417192,0.00005224699,0.00081147766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112238115,0.00010716635,0.000072581126,0.00021484813,0.00014006662,0.00040852078,0.00002163686,0.00011223898,0.00002889626],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003178903,0.000008994479,0.90052134,0.000040869207,0.00014817498,0.0000017114596,0.0004993931,0.00007969494,0.000049723276,0.03511584,0.04496729,0.018535204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020949675,0.000031250656,0.5349095,0.000025432755,0.000021434342,0.0000049822593,0.00039893854,0.058846366,0.0000051445686,0.0023742889,0.40307993,0.0000932712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003288395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003809021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36561185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003560559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026014002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8885111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407819161","doi":"10.1017/s0959270925000024","title":"Differences in breeding phenology between two geographically separated populations of the ʻuaʻu (Hawaiian Petrel <i>Pterodroma sandwichensis</i>)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation","keywords":"Zoology; Petrel; Geography; Biology; Ecology; Seabird","score_opus":0.036169199916919546,"score_gpt":0.28348788899033106,"score_spread":0.2473186890734115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407819161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9810042,0.000025580106,0.00020848234,0.0075614415,0.00029874267,0.00017397723,0.0000141939,0.00003581563,0.010677597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99812204,0.000017794478,0.00037103455,0.0010024305,0.00002564426,0.000025403298,0.0000105322615,0.0000064494047,0.0004186984],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879706,0.00008152591,0.00044781834,0.00023982793,0.00028701278,0.00014672914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994464,0.00013758439,0.00018133395,0.0001598398,0.00005301594,0.000021815908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001828292,0.00011640483,0.00018163778,0.000109886205,0.000110538516,0.000022907165,0.00044584332,0.00005487838,0.0005549057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016317675,0.00009494377,0.000070614886,0.0006877415,0.000212143,0.00012476959,0.00042835507,0.00012968053,0.000024009149],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012099402,0.000037614624,0.9898288,0.0000045891843,0.00004082683,4.3029104e-7,0.000063587046,0.000033455155,0.0004559529,0.0071187005,0.0009313145,0.0014725972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041893352,0.000018165952,0.9911347,0.000041308947,0.000018274402,9.19131e-7,0.00002691882,0.0014235298,0.00006808693,0.003949698,0.0028187102,0.000080746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01268841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02504989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017117843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009790701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021348678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411216872","doi":"10.1017/s0959270925100051","title":"Severe reduction in the distribution of the threatened New Caledonian Crow Honeyeater <i>Eugymnomyza aubryana</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bird Conservation International","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Montagne","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Geography; Zoology; Ecology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.008844643505239742,"score_gpt":0.22313307731354481,"score_spread":0.21428843380830506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411216872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9173121,0.000008992708,0.0010721147,0.07695842,0.00072279375,0.00027185382,0.000011783836,0.000025271607,0.0036166892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920254,0.0000075216485,0.000092086724,0.0035870434,0.00004994048,0.000041139516,0.000041589923,0.000004849383,0.004150426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901634,0.000121718775,0.00030711756,0.00019195049,0.00024707842,0.000115812094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994988,0.000080328835,0.00014170147,0.00022407949,0.000039279836,0.000015813368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031633623,0.00009228138,0.00008090893,0.00003790353,0.00013161168,0.000028776965,0.0004196182,0.000085874795,0.00036887036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012247729,0.00006416426,0.0000579895,0.00045276553,0.00015747445,0.0002494151,0.00009097238,0.0001310764,0.00005153872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004980581,0.00004895079,0.93353325,0.0000024189492,0.000015379106,4.442784e-7,0.00016801558,0.00049153704,0.00045641614,0.0049435305,0.058675915,0.0016143206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037010593,0.000010519635,0.97236454,0.000023626893,0.000012730478,0.000008040586,0.00008483683,0.0008920937,0.00063259184,0.0047084945,0.020826973,0.00006544945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002793237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019037355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07471332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018397607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008781779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42225575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}