{"meta":{"query_hash":"68c7adad84ce","filters":{"venue":"Bond Law Review"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/68c7adad84ce","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Bond+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1535633923","doi":"10.53300/001c.5461","title":"Australian Principles of Evidence (2nd Ed, 2004), Jeremy Gans and Andrew Palmer, Cavendish Publishing Limited","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.2243581389753008,"score_gpt":0.40113169913804747,"score_spread":0.17677356016274667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535633923","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017160416,0.88041615,0.00012802258,0.04570611,0.0005128661,0.001945094,0.000059662343,0.00024053664,0.053831164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5605165,0.4259026,0.005898747,0.00391543,0.00029713518,0.00004950394,0.000012441878,0.000045497378,0.0033621737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977852,0.00017021222,0.00057781127,0.00038688804,0.0007040935,0.00037576238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843514,0.00035851853,0.00035581618,0.0003479089,0.000283808,0.00021880679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002109926,0.00017360404,0.0004702084,0.000054185755,0.0003204088,0.0003791908,0.0005427221,0.00012436115,0.00027658543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038033829,0.00013714952,0.000100455814,0.00070289976,0.00042980994,0.001559109,0.000108321234,0.00020802765,0.000025827456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022804394,0.00016667113,0.0025121288,0.008550359,0.000060853337,0.000055063654,0.0026396296,0.00001825337,0.0000849859,0.83612555,0.028706558,0.12105715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001771308,0.000033037908,0.0014415972,0.014777213,0.000083292914,0.000010042422,0.00015815202,1.9580055e-7,0.00009624827,0.0033846782,0.9796342,0.00020418738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002444927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047986344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9509277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007360223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039777614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5592795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544282991","doi":"10.53300/001c.5608","title":"Dr John Kearney QC AM and the role of philanthropy in legal education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Generosity; Legal education; Political science; Law; Sociology; Management; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02070498761656456,"score_gpt":0.3705289617718886,"score_spread":0.349823974155324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544282991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013245756,0.041269273,0.0000047516446,0.16286089,0.0002256738,0.00040960597,0.0000011890131,0.000010790403,0.7938933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9509517,0.03535457,0.00018210003,0.011345742,0.00022421179,0.00006270814,0.0000068977097,0.0000053892018,0.0018667043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991693,0.00032949794,0.00020968232,0.00008226703,0.00012924966,0.00007999249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993758,0.00022642442,0.00013899256,0.00013307712,0.00009509262,0.000030586514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017013183,0.000042838703,0.00013398404,0.000020253,0.00016682791,0.000054762022,0.000101648315,0.000026383197,0.00023580059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009270799,0.000029854069,0.000025734751,0.00032286366,0.00028672672,0.0002831751,0.000011687047,0.00012621468,0.000024844545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019345596,0.000037220932,0.00014526874,0.000068312766,0.000001814826,1.2167358e-8,0.0010129521,2.6527522e-8,0.0000040275827,0.96607614,0.0055990946,0.027053203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008483776,0.000004598556,0.00035055212,0.0002632739,0.000015015867,7.716183e-7,0.00060346763,0.00000237058,0.000009515531,0.008385642,0.99024206,0.00003789105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02197593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004777552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016599937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003778131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9845368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551625796","doi":"10.53300/001c.5583","title":"The Solicitor-General in context: A tri-jurisdictional study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.04241980432290191,"score_gpt":0.3749907213378239,"score_spread":0.332570917014922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551625796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1259459,0.3157592,0.000020326665,0.0401957,0.0009926751,0.0053349067,0.000025797714,0.00012949543,0.51159596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849313,0.009727566,0.000018677607,0.0019466209,0.00060113356,0.00028361657,0.0000016155152,0.0000050406898,0.0024844192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907136,0.00018236549,0.00021293495,0.00008758569,0.00021038241,0.00023537822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995718,0.00010176159,0.000056074285,0.0001576764,0.000030265712,0.00008240044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014426347,0.000056603807,0.00012683633,0.000006335911,0.00057990785,0.00004051951,0.00018617598,0.000022643526,0.0000810136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046869485,0.0000366568,0.000058046076,0.00019128925,0.00009958633,0.00011912815,0.000032682576,0.000094443574,0.0001188343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.175944e-7,0.00011344584,0.0017748073,0.000012115581,0.000004808533,1.645342e-7,0.0009972122,6.382699e-8,0.0000011289245,0.98510295,0.0047290716,0.0072633126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000930607,0.0000075474727,0.0040853084,0.00005364235,0.000013169179,3.362916e-7,0.00032852354,7.318068e-7,8.5887984e-7,0.00048271875,0.9948839,0.000050194914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005709456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016759953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99015486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005161875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060786406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9352447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581112853","doi":"10.53300/001c.5617","title":"Faith in the courts: The aggrieved faithful seeking standing in Australia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.15229791589728242,"score_gpt":0.3931997543679755,"score_spread":0.24090183847069307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581112853","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21055983,0.3744895,0.00001963755,0.18410155,0.0010882039,0.0075941365,0.000026227512,0.00017552615,0.22194542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846234,0.011501535,0.00007652382,0.0028876537,0.00016244828,0.000098104756,0.0000021931814,0.0000068297118,0.00064132945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790454,0.00069529156,0.00031626393,0.0001736313,0.00054576003,0.00036453456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993266,0.0002490222,0.00012560676,0.00017017503,0.000068475274,0.000060117938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041060215,0.00012981288,0.0002955505,0.000009277825,0.0003964312,0.00011843897,0.0004421455,0.000054570562,0.000055916476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006647176,0.000061631166,0.00007314396,0.00042877047,0.00030799524,0.00020698813,0.00006141103,0.00026677462,0.00004962717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001412655,0.000110528876,0.018480763,0.0006753281,0.00004821674,0.00006763622,0.18137704,0.000007898503,0.0000108175245,0.70805585,0.086690255,0.0044615366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018612342,0.000011758295,0.00425244,0.00139934,0.00002549178,0.0000012701942,0.015759774,0.0000021062322,8.5843794e-7,0.0012865909,0.97694105,0.00013318515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03301125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06071854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8902508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002944935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052101608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.973428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947425977","doi":"10.53300/001c.5667","title":"Public Duty versus Private Information: Jury Privacy in the Information Age","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Criminology Research Advisory Council, Australian Institute of Criminology; Australian Institute of Criminology","keywords":"Jury; Impartiality; Duty; Personally identifiable information; Political science; Information privacy; Secrecy; Business; Law; Internet privacy; Public relations; Computer science","score_opus":0.11809618728811012,"score_gpt":0.37737603986446366,"score_spread":0.25927985257635355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947425977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035515523,0.008301848,0.00025227637,0.02683004,0.0009147967,0.0016234226,0.000009392574,0.00016803651,0.95834863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9068517,0.033968057,0.002544198,0.055390485,0.00065066875,0.00023429205,0.00009402669,0.000015222969,0.00025137077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829173,0.00019119382,0.0005148638,0.00008383519,0.00065327535,0.0002650824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886245,0.00021303615,0.00025244575,0.00037557152,0.00023736186,0.0000591216],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00262805,0.00010198313,0.00017900746,0.00006303862,0.00044030085,0.00045939806,0.0007735848,0.00006623412,0.00030774644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024197856,0.000069910166,0.00005722281,0.0010130305,0.00026652453,0.004112588,0.000097138545,0.00014003173,0.001504908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000077201785,0.000010845228,0.000017568025,0.0002923769,0.0000032399305,8.7662926e-7,0.0035688286,4.6419522e-8,6.380989e-8,0.78568447,0.028698627,0.18171534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001903204,0.00002662995,0.00073784793,0.00038128067,0.000009716442,0.0000012125857,0.0001718957,8.327714e-7,0.0000011845631,0.0027467208,0.9956381,0.000094256764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010114856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005417534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96693945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006633235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001940465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122270388","doi":"10.53300/001c.5598","title":"The idea of human rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05102647534024038,"score_gpt":0.42031768459823554,"score_spread":0.3692912092579952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122270388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025962607,0.006910426,0.00000608529,0.04896885,0.00016637349,0.00014970757,4.890866e-7,0.000013068165,0.9435254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96232766,0.0062131756,0.0002443105,0.0122860735,0.00043788253,0.00004425988,0.0000064296787,0.0000068569084,0.018433336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993761,0.00019084859,0.00017211046,0.000049244314,0.00013806864,0.000073616786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993194,0.0002535459,0.00012521612,0.00015766734,0.00011758965,0.000026577482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015184757,0.000028146633,0.00007608118,0.0000054011175,0.0008982352,0.000042476033,0.00014633333,0.000016263615,0.00034899206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003577028,0.000017170922,0.00003312928,0.00019675463,0.00015606699,0.00013692625,0.0000072478156,0.000075022086,0.00009576581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.789801e-8,0.000008001768,0.000005974761,0.000036924488,0.0000018491594,1.4177469e-8,0.00017170698,2.7775695e-9,0.000003879735,0.95434374,0.04270853,0.0027192675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015563915,0.0000048135744,0.000043725002,0.0001303446,0.000010981948,1.1753905e-7,0.000023008673,7.588628e-8,0.0000146212815,0.024306344,0.9754256,0.000024827215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071301856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0092061795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.962068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009609828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059173548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403450777","doi":"10.53300/001c.122033","title":"Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): Forensic Issues","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; Forensic science; Psychology; Attention deficit; Psychiatry; Clinical psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.044076674127497106,"score_gpt":0.35759068427810187,"score_spread":0.31351401015060476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403450777","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3896218,0.5627367,0.0005127082,0.02233922,0.00059606053,0.0015397558,0.000025718562,0.00055375346,0.022074303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9222098,0.061487578,0.0007488189,0.0027853271,0.0004242473,0.00018563513,0.00023419208,0.00013181908,0.011792571],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981659,0.0000912025,0.0004341132,0.00054179283,0.00044014593,0.00032681224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990109,0.00011066077,0.00008081165,0.00054731953,0.00012529206,0.0001250044],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003884131,0.0002940583,0.0006732739,0.000076348624,0.00011792092,0.00008086891,0.00008261707,0.00010867203,0.0013314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015047994,0.00023801002,0.00045284186,0.00046467295,0.00009360269,0.00045000244,0.000058784284,0.00038844525,0.0023587674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011974792,0.0022258395,0.030298397,0.07614592,0.0011735541,0.00087908935,0.000106279505,0.0000050140493,0.0075965878,0.25594893,0.075162455,0.5503382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042550793,0.0001054084,0.0055005103,0.009803556,0.00091684714,0.00046994752,0.00009229555,0.00014286557,0.000016569094,0.00022758727,0.9819578,0.0003411008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026549434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000089150504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9067953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007314588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007024756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411139558","doi":"10.53300/001c.140703","title":"Complex Regimes – Regulatory Overlap in Australia’s Cloud Services Sector","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Federal Police; Attorney-General's Department, Australian Government; Australian Government; Canadian Institute of Steel Construction; Department of Home Affairs; University of New South Wales","keywords":"Cloud computing; Business; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.0369505789396263,"score_gpt":0.279220980519745,"score_spread":0.24227040158011867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411139558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.152146,0.07360531,0.000020244077,0.0051186825,0.0012986425,0.0018535291,0.00001979951,0.00046656374,0.7654712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95225805,0.001693293,0.00016372709,0.028858863,0.0005173504,0.000079135454,0.000092312235,0.00004799618,0.01628925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985521,0.000011172926,0.00050141994,0.00039705867,0.00019724402,0.00034102492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917233,0.000026574813,0.0002512307,0.00046083072,0.00007807269,0.000010985249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036285789,0.00025316598,0.00051160844,0.0001281388,0.000080615246,0.00023214768,0.00041979883,0.00007729817,0.00033905113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040043673,0.00023858607,0.00013938046,0.0008663139,0.000082442275,0.0009514872,0.00023872274,0.00015900683,0.0006266611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008143836,0.000045341178,0.005035233,0.016794955,0.000014368794,0.00001503976,0.0000032582752,0.0000010888087,0.00005128044,0.8549676,0.121621035,0.0014426521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021680228,0.0000032813616,0.016723966,0.010519243,0.00004319446,0.0000015542141,0.0000070421925,0.000026611358,0.000019883793,0.006547445,0.9656459,0.00024509706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019018546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012005867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84842014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006499112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020042844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9729258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}