{"meta":{"query_hash":"68c7adad84ce","filters":{"venue":"Bond Law Review"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/68c7adad84ce","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Bond+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1535633923","doi":"10.53300/001c.5461","title":"Australian Principles of Evidence (2nd Ed, 2004), Jeremy Gans and Andrew Palmer, Cavendish Publishing Limited","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.2243581389753008,"score_gpt":0.40113169913804747,"score_spread":0.17677356016274667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535633923","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027885364,0.78888756,0.021435587,0.08086111,0.01457669,0.0012848491,0.008118905,0.00093042565,0.08362611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008880234,0.7723428,0.05193973,0.031870686,0.006295948,0.002984404,0.00460731,0.00090083515,0.12017809],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826568,0.0055236393,0.004285448,0.0007125058,0.0065970654,0.00022454161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93381566,0.036649913,0.0049600457,0.0031885041,0.020247916,0.0011379923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026969869,0.0023766558,0.003197818,0.014358461,0.0027106637,0.0077135907,0.0044758716,0.007892067,0.02917042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.092026636,0.0053691855,0.002078918,0.014250852,0.005126963,0.008066157,0.0033685956,0.010048398,0.021493278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035137153,0.000017350267,0.00022832664,0.0052152714,0.000056059176,0.000207169,0.00060045015,0.0003925319,0.00019741339,0.017974889,0.8660925,0.108982995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017102002,0.00002423468,0.0014789279,0.008758201,0.000049400893,0.00032315924,0.00028302113,0.0001740121,0.00011095238,0.018198565,0.9705446,0.00003777093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044464756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.092872426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044464756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069601596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022291621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14263201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544282991","doi":"10.53300/001c.5608","title":"Dr John Kearney QC AM and the role of philanthropy in legal education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Generosity; Legal education; Political science; Law; Sociology; Management; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02070498761656456,"score_gpt":0.3705289617718886,"score_spread":0.349823974155324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544282991","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00084216613,0.087559566,0.000321391,0.8700857,0.013071731,0.000016594347,0.000021713733,0.000016644146,0.02806445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07636355,0.12143109,0.0013514349,0.55411184,0.029776389,0.000113373244,0.000047474947,0.000083397754,0.21672145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98864007,0.004137866,0.00052851177,0.0011783199,0.0045812554,0.00093398837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9709338,0.0147378035,0.0019835334,0.0005686401,0.00793197,0.0038442377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008890343,0.0003155034,0.0005511364,0.0009727788,0.0059292195,0.0071898554,0.0013374704,0.015401245,0.01740848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04249347,0.0003751075,0.0003163413,0.001251765,0.0046945605,0.0059724436,0.002724586,0.016364034,0.0025185319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024697214,0.000021013591,0.0005798142,0.00034157842,0.000008240255,0.00013256818,0.00052284874,0.00008113504,0.00015502631,0.0852591,0.86405635,0.048817605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007747497,0.000021424641,0.0008456576,0.00046864452,0.0000070236997,0.00018031662,0.00058382074,0.000070759634,0.00013675394,0.005875418,0.9917829,0.00001944812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043762106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0842928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043762106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005950087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019039746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087014794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551625796","doi":"10.53300/001c.5583","title":"The Solicitor-General in context: A tri-jurisdictional study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.04241980432290191,"score_gpt":0.3749907213378239,"score_spread":0.332570917014922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551625796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8864899,0.004712446,0.0016973199,0.0071927225,0.0000967349,0.00018033532,0.00018738053,0.000008148867,0.09943504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99580115,0.0010929492,0.0003014469,0.00083547964,0.000032208107,0.00006060598,0.00004302217,0.0000062559016,0.001826959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915086,0.004890985,0.0002015095,0.00065138325,0.0011211565,0.0016264566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923522,0.0033133952,0.0015407794,0.00040866478,0.0011075772,0.001277318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005892021,0.0001959985,0.0006745597,0.004573656,0.013480788,0.006099233,0.0014454514,0.0024054241,0.006649259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010890261,0.00030434507,0.0003168943,0.00902842,0.012245421,0.007897654,0.010540752,0.0034738735,0.00043108215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001051313,0.00026358292,0.11245261,0.00031680064,0.00005086635,0.0022286563,0.25667316,0.00032686867,0.00054128334,0.5987558,0.0044729854,0.023812229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035245437,0.00015668919,0.09551505,0.00070608145,0.00007749046,0.0011741495,0.80898434,0.0006989936,0.00018969702,0.025562298,0.066852205,0.00004773002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14201288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3680778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14201288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009995865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011949675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2823726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581112853","doi":"10.53300/001c.5617","title":"Faith in the courts: The aggrieved faithful seeking standing in Australia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.15229791589728242,"score_gpt":0.3931997543679755,"score_spread":0.24090183847069307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581112853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7032749,0.028597035,0.0014542934,0.094006106,0.00058065314,0.0000553461,0.000015809903,0.000010088737,0.17200582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751823,0.0060960483,0.00026432643,0.0061571808,0.00014498208,0.000011626336,0.000003874538,0.0000048976226,0.01213473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996358,0.0016448302,0.00012845678,0.00027551726,0.0009860952,0.0006071122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99508804,0.0025050598,0.0008269998,0.00021837083,0.00068815175,0.00067330344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046655675,0.00008747455,0.00027978653,0.0009518435,0.0090105925,0.004199272,0.0010499717,0.0035366404,0.0017299858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008635601,0.0002874668,0.00018505946,0.0010675229,0.017470332,0.0029807098,0.005294163,0.0062159966,0.00014095727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018295017,0.00007213346,0.00964782,0.00022329742,0.000013708165,0.0035020802,0.3500316,0.00015654984,0.00076457235,0.56592727,0.0070419554,0.062600695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021932448,0.0002966256,0.109993234,0.0020237789,0.00005504234,0.004129473,0.22716637,0.0009871452,0.0008367943,0.09511451,0.55922794,0.00014709991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09833676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18200262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09833676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006630033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010551041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19552875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947425977","doi":"10.53300/001c.5667","title":"Public Duty versus Private Information: Jury Privacy in the Information Age","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Criminology Research Advisory Council, Australian Institute of Criminology; Australian Institute of Criminology","keywords":"Jury; Impartiality; Duty; Personally identifiable information; Political science; Information privacy; Secrecy; Business; Law; Internet privacy; Public relations; Computer science","score_opus":0.11809618728811012,"score_gpt":0.37737603986446366,"score_spread":0.25927985257635355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947425977","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02419,0.2903289,0.017629126,0.50120616,0.0021851868,0.000107130436,0.000103288025,0.000029484454,0.1642208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7142193,0.147237,0.0057676462,0.11520405,0.006781032,0.000271798,0.000058898615,0.000034998357,0.010425304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8890088,0.07751527,0.004715707,0.005201361,0.018912977,0.004645901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83322597,0.14669073,0.0071082846,0.0047847517,0.006886729,0.0013035217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.067327194,0.0003378037,0.0012156345,0.002570725,0.00743847,0.0116846915,0.0025649886,0.015957594,0.0040120115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13761804,0.00057097734,0.0011145873,0.0032303587,0.031774886,0.014149041,0.0049834824,0.0113604395,0.00060495094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037141737,0.000026572397,0.0010787038,0.000537872,0.00003810497,0.00016920827,0.0027477029,0.00030609604,0.00007476945,0.9510282,0.010073955,0.03388167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008723391,0.00023250819,0.007785317,0.008341513,0.00014001146,0.0006976393,0.0066939117,0.00096885255,0.0005826633,0.7147896,0.2595637,0.00011699143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012787274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017737862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067327194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008452038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018897993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3560645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122270388","doi":"10.53300/001c.5598","title":"The idea of human rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05102647534024038,"score_gpt":0.42031768459823554,"score_spread":0.3692912092579952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122270388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021137584,0.031003052,0.023653254,0.3047634,0.0063118534,0.000058884016,0.00010397172,0.0000698069,0.631922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45139673,0.025229873,0.01529723,0.16660655,0.014238282,0.0005519396,0.00011345404,0.00022115631,0.32634476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99392384,0.0035622062,0.00013469296,0.00084013725,0.0010706934,0.00046828113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958692,0.002657694,0.00024544058,0.0005320589,0.0003810289,0.00031450432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006519308,0.0005464025,0.0005179911,0.0014254384,0.0040901923,0.009085063,0.0013759062,0.0056456313,0.0129321655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071377927,0.00031836206,0.0005676107,0.000853636,0.03963695,0.011723478,0.0035529532,0.013835956,0.0024635647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013933047,0.0000012652101,0.000010460276,0.000008519462,7.117791e-7,0.000004508865,0.00020882301,0.000013690069,0.0000078623925,0.99213505,0.0062732277,0.0013345001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054293873,0.000011253161,0.00006561698,0.00011892107,0.0000021149144,0.00004007029,0.00036843106,0.000069048576,0.000043901582,0.6468391,0.3524307,0.000005387259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004186359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003092065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0129321655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050872625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043496736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043262362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403450777","doi":"10.53300/001c.122033","title":"Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): Forensic Issues","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; Forensic science; Psychology; Attention deficit; Psychiatry; Clinical psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.044076674127497106,"score_gpt":0.35759068427810187,"score_spread":0.31351401015060476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403450777","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010121098,0.5314055,0.0014284529,0.37160835,0.004001409,0.0000834242,0.00007696928,0.000026091104,0.08124871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20176266,0.62026757,0.0037755964,0.14347091,0.006327349,0.00011268435,0.00009986194,0.000026114021,0.02415724],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935402,0.0020132526,0.0007377904,0.00046014247,0.0025050412,0.000743611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98732656,0.007185021,0.0015345633,0.00032570507,0.002859723,0.0007683723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008438482,0.00051011035,0.0010559025,0.0032342316,0.00679475,0.006128303,0.0026629004,0.012249585,0.0033466297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023408419,0.00044500694,0.00067575235,0.0021153782,0.010454652,0.0044901576,0.003942955,0.008979766,0.00070348725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023311251,0.000082556224,0.0052194786,0.0044701225,0.00004559753,0.013729977,0.0092453575,0.00036414663,0.00062894326,0.29059756,0.15648113,0.51911193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016660048,0.00009860603,0.015889153,0.030481573,0.00015879922,0.034530565,0.019669458,0.00022314228,0.00060794305,0.055410184,0.842804,0.00011000403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10365774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24689406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10365774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008501418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026364628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20610875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411139558","doi":"10.53300/001c.140703","title":"Complex Regimes – Regulatory Overlap in Australia’s Cloud Services Sector","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Federal Police; Attorney-General's Department, Australian Government; Australian Government; Canadian Institute of Steel Construction; Department of Home Affairs; University of New South Wales","keywords":"Cloud computing; Business; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.0369505789396263,"score_gpt":0.279220980519745,"score_spread":0.24227040158011867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411139558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5619257,0.021354988,0.011805569,0.08951284,0.0005441723,0.0005831056,0.00016420157,0.00009248573,0.31401688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95863694,0.0052789003,0.0024999487,0.017424075,0.00020223994,0.00019033231,0.000046385125,0.00002645431,0.0156947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97451967,0.0061984826,0.0013705803,0.0025633075,0.011644527,0.0037034333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97595197,0.012929434,0.0036263135,0.0015955087,0.004212603,0.0016841824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01623469,0.00019125598,0.00046462318,0.0032128722,0.009584606,0.0118480455,0.0017141968,0.0049634674,0.0026811028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022374256,0.00093183434,0.0007661405,0.0030591004,0.018502565,0.0067896005,0.009966283,0.0069907415,0.00024366668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003574382,0.000093713,0.0101152295,0.0003246262,0.000045907705,0.0015484531,0.022322001,0.0014087051,0.001271854,0.91198665,0.006542369,0.044304796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008051415,0.00026348943,0.17137074,0.0024295822,0.00012592784,0.0018521514,0.02040886,0.007989041,0.001506927,0.21499133,0.5786175,0.0003639547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2588684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2685706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2588684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030156462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042246014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51472324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}