{"meta":{"query_hash":"16906c5c5a97","filters":{"venue":"Boston College environmental affairs law review"},"cohort_total":9,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":9,"exported":9,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/16906c5c5a97","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Boston+College+environmental+affairs+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W1497034446","doi":"","title":"Surveying the Precautionary Principle's Ongoing Global Development: The Evolution of an Emergent Environmental Management Tool","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College environmental affairs law review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Opposition (politics); Political science; Law and economics; German; Order (exchange); International trade; Business; Economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.012040494441458974,"score_gpt":0.2716426946662948,"score_spread":0.2596022002248358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497034446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11640493,0.09465217,0.024695603,0.17484333,0.0007746446,0.00006424716,0.000107992084,0.000085479616,0.5883716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92237777,0.04876658,0.0077486644,0.00788611,0.00063306786,0.000054143737,0.00005604745,0.00006725849,0.012410361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956885,0.0021424124,0.00016777398,0.0005186873,0.0010962589,0.00038637486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99353397,0.004377085,0.00057032274,0.0005676749,0.0008034147,0.00014762148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061924704,0.00026377646,0.00039755364,0.0028707816,0.002468228,0.008619039,0.0007259712,0.0027131722,0.0015733106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064696996,0.00023316876,0.00031718716,0.003975165,0.020557387,0.010116549,0.0031222575,0.004733421,0.00018471904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004450472,0.0000069121156,0.00046724494,0.000046580826,0.0000028100942,0.00006719734,0.002447949,0.0002595232,0.00013494314,0.96500343,0.0018299144,0.029729007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074374357,0.00005664563,0.005598417,0.00047810026,0.000008951629,0.0003438785,0.00852954,0.0010399641,0.0005764458,0.5779583,0.4053661,0.00003625998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006611198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008075842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008619039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006181716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053120614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04485172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539178240","doi":"","title":"The \"Wholly Separate\" Truth: Did the Yellowstone Wolf Reintroduction Violate Section 10(J) of the Endangered Species Act?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College environmental affairs law review","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Endangered species; Section (typography); Geography; Ecology; Biology; Business; Habitat","score_opus":0.010460451837528664,"score_gpt":0.21088064592736688,"score_spread":0.20042019408983822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1539178240","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0202706,0.0018577685,0.00090956077,0.92305005,0.0036807437,0.000037752885,0.00013699208,0.000035760044,0.05002082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1561806,0.0019382765,0.0007265027,0.80345124,0.0030810842,0.00007101861,0.000114419076,0.00004098034,0.034395892],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920473,0.0020867225,0.0005597035,0.0012561508,0.0022523187,0.0017978384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890891,0.006811894,0.001082101,0.0003965009,0.0021379474,0.0004825657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011980662,0.00056377903,0.0007419187,0.0006622214,0.014697403,0.009554065,0.0030092732,0.036108132,0.0046490734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026522022,0.00070163596,0.0009073789,0.00095391105,0.013606961,0.009257494,0.0039855624,0.030277435,0.0011461513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100024634,0.00009351166,0.0070069474,0.00012244855,0.00003723992,0.001654863,0.02328038,0.00023897456,0.0008100478,0.46305454,0.4876142,0.015986765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014270369,0.00016830004,0.01470354,0.001281438,0.0001711832,0.00071119715,0.064890966,0.0016204773,0.0019514988,0.12672667,0.7873276,0.00030439984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13092636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16694334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13092636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067054736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0144076785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2603286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551821446","doi":"","title":"Prioritizing Multiple Uses on Public Lands After Bear Lodge","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College environmental affairs law review","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Native american; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Babbitt; Federal court; Sociology; Supreme court; Geography; Engineering; Ethnology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.010577963135942555,"score_gpt":0.20210866806202601,"score_spread":0.19153070492608346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551821446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47683427,0.00092918833,0.010599975,0.008858286,0.00013217497,0.00012230776,0.000060914037,0.00011815434,0.5023447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680154,0.00024100456,0.0019987384,0.0012961068,0.000078665464,0.00004800677,0.000025624886,0.000034214525,0.028262166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910999,0.001698723,0.00022037589,0.00077484886,0.0034095966,0.0027966106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541414,0.0021726924,0.0005140164,0.000536241,0.0009622068,0.00040062994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041546063,0.00029344135,0.00048271718,0.0017181237,0.011183251,0.007728887,0.0020571796,0.0039807553,0.011426858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006725907,0.00053492095,0.0005932293,0.0013466997,0.0065713217,0.006225297,0.0054788976,0.0033175272,0.000847106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013088966,0.0007092211,0.051264513,0.00022786844,0.00008856775,0.005953886,0.037652865,0.002822579,0.012762011,0.75029695,0.023448119,0.11464255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075454875,0.000965769,0.10101622,0.00071394537,0.0003120213,0.0029536977,0.09920968,0.0052843858,0.016559817,0.17861015,0.5940494,0.0002494582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032320857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16905543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032320857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065316367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010962943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06426543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577890291","doi":"","title":"The Pragmatic Migratory Bird Treaty Act: Protecting \"Property\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College environmental affairs law review","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Convention; Wildlife; Property (philosophy); Political science; Law; Legislation; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.006002052826591576,"score_gpt":0.2122974366103005,"score_spread":0.20629538378370893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577890291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009434983,0.0058709513,0.0033571024,0.06949736,0.0012082792,0.000084773776,0.00040169962,0.00007004152,0.9100748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42429855,0.008622621,0.004985971,0.19234626,0.0022273913,0.0010139846,0.00061012193,0.00013662082,0.3657585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99495935,0.0017988767,0.00019750174,0.0004733101,0.0018115785,0.00075928663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982284,0.00088173803,0.00019499434,0.00015087335,0.00041795988,0.00012604594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003128106,0.00056498614,0.00033152412,0.0006809339,0.007342851,0.006281875,0.0012726311,0.010883888,0.005843065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008229308,0.00049320614,0.0004244539,0.0012275997,0.0076028467,0.0036912465,0.0026250875,0.008225,0.0016130366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010361173,0.000015839754,0.00036623608,0.000037985643,0.0000031004263,0.0001430403,0.0014920951,0.00009220742,0.00020639924,0.8965418,0.096064836,0.0050261556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023881657,0.00003124761,0.0019007161,0.00029984795,0.0000135497985,0.00012581334,0.0012900862,0.00021823513,0.00019662126,0.062119994,0.9337485,0.00003138032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09628243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11943048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09628243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005586504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012462622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19144398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589262316","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Peoples' Environmental Rights: Evolving Common Law Perspectives in Canada, Australia, and the United States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College environmental affairs law review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Law; Sovereignty; Obligation; Common law; Duty; Environmental law; Sociology; Politics; Ecology","score_opus":0.008869416135965319,"score_gpt":0.23833586956173694,"score_spread":0.22946645342577163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589262316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2513292,0.065122575,0.0025618859,0.2767481,0.00074240426,0.00012366385,0.000121341734,0.000034096378,0.40321678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95057136,0.016272433,0.0011619345,0.019344836,0.00020192895,0.000055875866,0.00003340334,0.000017463439,0.0123406155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851046,0.0031104886,0.00033700286,0.0008829438,0.00547711,0.005087823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98213136,0.00890697,0.0007311209,0.00027805148,0.0052582906,0.0026941388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012652566,0.00036224304,0.00095926743,0.006696951,0.038356643,0.02335132,0.0036522904,0.009467697,0.0021928174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020536266,0.00055104005,0.0005554508,0.006825603,0.055822298,0.0066518546,0.006557713,0.011157737,0.00007986081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011698592,0.00004532642,0.0021070624,0.00011226885,0.000017640206,0.0005636837,0.07312702,0.0004785583,0.00013804893,0.9016129,0.0080648465,0.013720865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044842174,0.000054303495,0.030138569,0.002224438,0.00014188346,0.00036196862,0.29087758,0.002492092,0.0005227372,0.2843874,0.38846925,0.0002849911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98423254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9913271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17712484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17712484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21438558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95441854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590256349","doi":"","title":"Great Lakes Compact and an Ohio Constitutional Amendment: Local Protectionism and Regional Cooperation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College environmental affairs law review","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; State (computer science); Social connectedness; Autonomy; Natural resource; Resource (disambiguation); Balance (ability); Environmental planning; Business; Geography; Political science; Law; International trade","score_opus":0.009293709180704332,"score_gpt":0.21485278823183876,"score_spread":0.20555907905113444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590256349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12422201,0.002909773,0.005813425,0.078255,0.0006862675,0.00013709102,0.00023627415,0.00008999372,0.78765017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8873555,0.0007737422,0.0015681002,0.03044636,0.0005649388,0.00025618315,0.00007977859,0.000031059015,0.078924425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99315506,0.0021568662,0.00028104748,0.001262556,0.001454169,0.0016902183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964038,0.0019554775,0.00035899927,0.00041421922,0.0004626075,0.0004049506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008417975,0.0003205112,0.00039332427,0.0007363355,0.011592225,0.011186003,0.0015913715,0.011230541,0.0069935718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075239856,0.0006057188,0.0005981697,0.0010474134,0.0141654,0.005069889,0.0056679808,0.00788592,0.0005013735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016941094,0.000020294348,0.0006898226,0.000016129947,0.0000067085325,0.00012843363,0.0018418231,0.00022001645,0.00016531705,0.9844787,0.009917019,0.0024988176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022160601,0.00020364375,0.009576681,0.0003503248,0.00013562507,0.0002925392,0.008686783,0.002326471,0.0008642887,0.24562493,0.73153645,0.00018071334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07665223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12058005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9233478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00891611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011088704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15241212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W180777813","doi":"","title":"Trading Up Kyoto: A Proposal to Amend the Protocol, Part I","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College environmental affairs law review","topic":"Nuclear and radioactivity studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Protocol (science); Business; International trade; Computer science; Greenhouse gas; Biology; Medicine","score_opus":0.009632614626317908,"score_gpt":0.22273704247260032,"score_spread":0.21310442784628242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W180777813","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005531633,0.013206818,0.04146288,0.41077825,0.17455764,0.0042629326,0.0020308096,0.002343743,0.34582525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0330495,0.012691939,0.08160486,0.49300262,0.035580583,0.0077276006,0.002771688,0.0018338311,0.33173743],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97715545,0.0040992848,0.0026101796,0.0024162498,0.0109855095,0.002733275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98675644,0.0055270884,0.0011376167,0.0016016292,0.0037305856,0.0012466353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03048425,0.0020323908,0.0010216609,0.0023197103,0.004952136,0.01636431,0.0056569255,0.046210624,0.008242761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049142163,0.001490346,0.0029928032,0.002219775,0.0075731585,0.014087754,0.0068441764,0.027369063,0.008832361],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052786338,0.00020481768,0.0002999035,0.0003972212,0.000032238047,0.0005218723,0.001487441,0.0010915118,0.0016469253,0.4353119,0.5251651,0.03378831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004476806,0.00007407223,0.00044237744,0.00031881733,0.000029889781,0.000132567,0.00026475638,0.00031198218,0.00047581532,0.029409986,0.9684023,0.00009267245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014432149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0093782395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046210624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006169065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031491984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16121805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112888221","doi":"","title":"Oil and Freshwater Don't Mix: Transnational Regulation of Drilling in the Great Lakes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College environmental affairs law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oil drilling; Jurisdiction; Drilling; Shore; Oil reserves; Oil pollution; Oil spill; Fossil fuel; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Business; Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Petroleum; Law; Oceanography; Political science; Engineering; Geology; Economics; Waste management","score_opus":0.010407559926024797,"score_gpt":0.23930098447593456,"score_spread":0.22889342454990977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112888221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20375833,0.0083430465,0.009822396,0.22324422,0.00052691426,0.00012871707,0.00011765895,0.00008253864,0.5539761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95206106,0.0017448426,0.0012833445,0.02438397,0.000223244,0.00009072749,0.000024677616,0.000023008297,0.020165138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99140114,0.0037949358,0.0004450566,0.0009664161,0.0021339431,0.0012584989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99245304,0.004959012,0.00069870445,0.000516332,0.0010385924,0.0003342519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010484182,0.00015695691,0.00028268338,0.0008374985,0.0060180114,0.008147003,0.0012057545,0.008182208,0.0023663817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015304701,0.00034509474,0.00059232314,0.00085369544,0.012908997,0.0042799744,0.0045640767,0.005858978,0.00020519306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015675432,0.000014693973,0.0012559722,0.000038308368,0.000016835833,0.00030391544,0.0035469292,0.0005959371,0.00048586904,0.98105824,0.007531167,0.0051363413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013884493,0.0001161636,0.013084419,0.0005115583,0.00019523311,0.00037652015,0.013665058,0.005881829,0.0027060322,0.5898429,0.37331098,0.00017040895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058104463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08524958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94189554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006311562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011483181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11553252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2650041340","doi":"","title":"HFC Smuggling: Preventing the Illicit (and Lucrative) Sale of Greenhouse Gases","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College environmental affairs law review","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Business; Waste management; Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Engineering; Economics; Geology","score_opus":0.016531908345674994,"score_gpt":0.26583223428990427,"score_spread":0.24930032594422927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2650041340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022570465,0.055927206,0.004875551,0.20623788,0.004542747,0.00034263797,0.00040248144,0.00019134035,0.7049096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4047449,0.051247034,0.004068051,0.32393155,0.0041234056,0.00043509522,0.00032140705,0.00012507054,0.21100359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99218994,0.0015205279,0.00026996247,0.0006952394,0.003434899,0.001889481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948336,0.002298322,0.00032248622,0.0002999233,0.001973145,0.00027249195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008750003,0.00058997306,0.00037102078,0.0017973507,0.0046046125,0.0069289226,0.0030319027,0.016789503,0.005180219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014085005,0.0004259715,0.0008070802,0.0010114594,0.009702207,0.0042002313,0.002014393,0.008739443,0.0011610697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003522531,0.000078777004,0.0009398711,0.00036510438,0.000031538173,0.0005664963,0.0011039975,0.0007419067,0.0010031116,0.71085674,0.24044462,0.0438326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056774265,0.00011601572,0.0031765138,0.00093285594,0.000082053004,0.00024534238,0.0010251326,0.00057197484,0.0019719896,0.041378472,0.9503515,0.00009133897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30001625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31655988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30001625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010948563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028176328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}