{"meta":{"query_hash":"553f14198f86","filters":{"venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review"},"cohort_total":17,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":17,"exported":17,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/553f14198f86","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Boston+College+international+and+comparative+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W1484164960","doi":"","title":"Debunking the \"End of History\" Thesis for Corporate Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate law; Shareholder; Shareholder primacy; Jurisprudence; Corporation; Statute; Law; Corporate governance; Legal history; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.11771708646750359,"score_gpt":0.27665271961766363,"score_spread":0.15893563315016004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484164960","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00921244,0.022794202,0.020607606,0.67594093,0.005772175,0.000041104915,0.00008868246,0.00008505667,0.26545778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6839316,0.021480957,0.013508191,0.19748414,0.012409847,0.00015880635,0.00014193665,0.00016390398,0.07072053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99333185,0.002380799,0.00020171377,0.00065864646,0.0027570755,0.00067004154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876645,0.008366852,0.0005471257,0.0008856892,0.0017961704,0.00073956454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008479344,0.0003622197,0.00043032918,0.0014126645,0.0052599492,0.008953089,0.001714529,0.0062085288,0.0035873076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017754668,0.00024582213,0.00038407545,0.00094641536,0.036499124,0.014267314,0.004144868,0.011368755,0.00074837706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024477442,0.0000028465854,0.000045634148,0.000008933254,8.388899e-7,0.000011704751,0.00058210344,0.000026280519,0.000012072465,0.9864699,0.009886745,0.002950414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008735062,0.000010015112,0.00033819742,0.00014650066,0.0000035411747,0.000050993724,0.00092849607,0.00020136793,0.0001490216,0.71749926,0.28065038,0.000013518475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01967765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025780134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01967765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009166923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011836567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066511035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486267892","doi":"","title":"Hans Off!: The Struggle for Hans Island and the Potential Ramifications for International Border Disupute Resolution","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resolution (logic); Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0339229720634287,"score_gpt":0.3575608104677152,"score_spread":0.3236378384042865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486267892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15300615,0.004284633,0.0035252427,0.14061396,0.0009052311,0.00004944221,0.000041284322,0.0000384124,0.6975357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8944211,0.0022518497,0.0012770884,0.03144872,0.00042418516,0.000050187587,0.000031956286,0.000037651625,0.0700574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969806,0.0009786248,0.00011147202,0.0003888591,0.00060123607,0.00093910313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966376,0.0022002114,0.00019334143,0.000219552,0.00042004843,0.00032920964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006577534,0.0002648389,0.0003460508,0.00074311346,0.014039951,0.013855777,0.0016517658,0.012333003,0.0053550024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069439234,0.00032794772,0.00044358004,0.00085282215,0.013426885,0.006735496,0.005203162,0.011305372,0.00053785974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018057166,0.000017599436,0.0014477414,0.00002184407,0.000007184138,0.0018028106,0.009645687,0.00017785518,0.00026561017,0.96161145,0.018022373,0.0069616656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047275287,0.00006496665,0.0045985556,0.0004945523,0.000080590326,0.0015005147,0.100350745,0.0024379357,0.0017498631,0.28155315,0.60701406,0.00010778255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05080898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.088510446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94919103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005371745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005744699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101026475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497617816","doi":"","title":"Abortion Crisis in Peru: Finding a Woman’s Right to Obtain Safe and Legal Abortions in the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"International Human Rights and Reproductive Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Complaint; Convention; Punishment (psychology); Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Criminology; Medicine; Sociology; History; Psychology; Pregnancy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.059075277711635954,"score_gpt":0.3717708894416936,"score_spread":0.31269561173005767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497617816","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09177849,0.22050352,0.0007446908,0.43914124,0.0008585213,0.000071293165,0.00008429206,0.00002148944,0.24679656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7269426,0.14898285,0.0007648506,0.08759507,0.0024925019,0.00014961493,0.0001795054,0.000019153174,0.03287395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981352,0.0011898256,0.00006783561,0.000090875415,0.00024245557,0.0002737078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974153,0.0017824437,0.00023335488,0.00006136299,0.00034267333,0.00016474482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030476754,0.00014928904,0.00032360613,0.0007823939,0.004349843,0.0035806345,0.0006079502,0.0046072383,0.0030384418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005084939,0.0002074922,0.000286917,0.0008229939,0.0043650693,0.002622733,0.0026978191,0.004066258,0.00024566488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010820384,0.00020151159,0.011107825,0.001954141,0.000053524553,0.006344013,0.06559571,0.00048866763,0.0019383718,0.6944054,0.1002667,0.11753597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006372434,0.00019095828,0.04349452,0.0019832067,0.0000638703,0.0019242066,0.025939744,0.00032642655,0.00064432266,0.052242707,0.87306195,0.00006429835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02168426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031512402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02168426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032250464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005822264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043116093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502863097","doi":"","title":"Defining “Developing Country” in the Second Commitment Period of the Kyoto Protocol","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Developing country; Negotiation; Industrialisation; China; Convention; Developed country; Greenhouse gas; Political science; International trade; Development economics; Business; Economic growth; Economics; Law; Medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.16933353782127025,"score_gpt":0.32864665573037904,"score_spread":0.1593131179091088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502863097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08206121,0.009100435,0.03683,0.039695844,0.0010372304,0.00027745657,0.00027052136,0.000054490247,0.8306728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94941616,0.0032083278,0.011085967,0.009097078,0.00033760924,0.00069743226,0.0001480777,0.000074772666,0.025934566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949569,0.0024993452,0.00026315585,0.00059216,0.0006157848,0.0010726069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752074,0.000875881,0.0004953976,0.00021849401,0.00041847536,0.00047103743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005887962,0.00054231106,0.0004881288,0.0018629264,0.004462769,0.0099106515,0.000998813,0.004746711,0.0026615758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056607,0.0003397383,0.00053458585,0.0018513517,0.012237863,0.007962975,0.0066939355,0.008499143,0.00053603004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008655464,0.0000046800965,0.00034740774,0.00000979877,0.0000014970989,0.00007289148,0.0015489042,0.000107207015,0.000072356874,0.995359,0.001176432,0.0012912268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051897543,0.00007894684,0.0031757995,0.000443081,0.000016231226,0.00050423323,0.009741153,0.0013255958,0.0009065627,0.5950583,0.38862833,0.0000698465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071734986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056481506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0099106515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052900985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058176867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03838259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507716209","doi":"","title":"Native American Free Passage Rights Under the 1794 Jay Treaty: Survival Under United States Statutory Law and Canadian Common Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Treaty; Law; Common law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Government (linguistics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.04931424603087172,"score_gpt":0.3373543570389605,"score_spread":0.2880401110080888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507716209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05476914,0.0059587224,0.0021327643,0.029547375,0.00032598057,0.00005283764,0.00031568314,0.0000295766,0.90686804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85849565,0.0047302437,0.0018471516,0.011000738,0.00021690883,0.00006874392,0.00020184951,0.00003604097,0.12340279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940469,0.0006378621,0.00009022966,0.0004461524,0.002217113,0.0025616947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975458,0.0006605033,0.000171639,0.00012968773,0.001009425,0.0004829332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034122309,0.00028795615,0.0003918499,0.0017134692,0.019422498,0.011505871,0.0011948432,0.0039775404,0.006432645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073182946,0.00026205787,0.00033446826,0.0021870534,0.014770099,0.0036319087,0.0031664951,0.0046588783,0.000601786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009956779,0.000008545513,0.0006433441,0.000012535003,0.0000021064363,0.000073456016,0.004113134,0.00008693817,0.000081584294,0.97791433,0.010070973,0.006983178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028348986,0.000034045395,0.013730603,0.00034962234,0.000039792474,0.00020940632,0.012687336,0.00047823522,0.00055960595,0.20268819,0.7690916,0.000103202794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06726998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04698387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10039678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3408934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515546384","doi":"","title":"The Commerce Clause – Commonwealth Comparisons","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Commonwealth; Commerce Clause; Law; Political science; Subject (documents); Power (physics); Dormant Commerce Clause; Federalism; Politics","score_opus":0.10675605986598544,"score_gpt":0.393803836988847,"score_spread":0.28704777712286156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515546384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068913,0.0026007514,0.0015005787,0.0031525597,0.00008910611,0.000020094001,0.0000454719,0.0000063371053,0.9236722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97418547,0.0010559757,0.0003325628,0.00088294456,0.000066432396,0.000021336795,0.000054602144,0.000016193339,0.02338445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99486166,0.0016571919,0.00015536945,0.0003730663,0.0018767219,0.0010760064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713045,0.0014424521,0.00024587405,0.00028268286,0.00070394564,0.00019473048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034426977,0.00019167789,0.00028230256,0.003674282,0.006111802,0.008252898,0.00067433604,0.0019869315,0.012929567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009411376,0.0001504361,0.00041374503,0.0040972354,0.009636018,0.004399242,0.0033938242,0.002237621,0.0006078314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074534137,0.000006929757,0.0005486434,0.0000062746503,0.0000040968157,0.000042598742,0.0017171658,0.000040246883,0.000060026956,0.99180704,0.001226831,0.004532628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002744685,0.0000793186,0.020776728,0.0002998494,0.000052624404,0.00014496404,0.010599405,0.0006746676,0.00095746596,0.8073453,0.15901174,0.00003052145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03170575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06052532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03170575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059138993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033923923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0630424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522148397","doi":"","title":"Shielding the Public Interest: What Canada Can Learn from the United States in the Wake of National Post and Globe & Mail","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Freedom of the press; Political science; Confidentiality; Globe; Freedom of information; Privilege (computing); Presumption; Politics","score_opus":0.10035977786571171,"score_gpt":0.32405598520166395,"score_spread":0.22369620733595225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522148397","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037672205,0.020760022,0.00020605922,0.9158451,0.0039976053,0.000012004291,0.00028976647,0.000033348053,0.055088855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22456281,0.058530785,0.0010300098,0.6591891,0.005184851,0.000035554167,0.00039698227,0.00015091461,0.050918996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99189067,0.0010921066,0.00016200593,0.0005918659,0.002757879,0.003505429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96678746,0.0053577824,0.00077723817,0.0008405976,0.014588673,0.01164821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008101926,0.00047963866,0.000835749,0.0020059643,0.024907967,0.023329478,0.0025890726,0.014986291,0.018663183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021946715,0.00042160082,0.0007028761,0.0034219446,0.019377666,0.009558835,0.005180187,0.019718219,0.0018557947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008710566,0.00006429964,0.0039300993,0.00023328075,0.000021667822,0.00060113054,0.005444551,0.00018408502,0.00010749715,0.16475204,0.751709,0.072865315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022865694,0.000017570483,0.004927717,0.0013876808,0.000027111813,0.0001070262,0.01124149,0.00012494766,0.0001396388,0.02285796,0.9590457,0.00010019072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9635547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9844391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10954564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10954564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27905324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.794813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528615804","doi":"","title":"Building Fortress India: Should a Federal Law Be Created to Address Privacy Concerns in the United States-Indian Business Process Outsourcing Relationship","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outsourcing; Guard (computer science); Business; Legislation; European union; Law; International trade; Political science; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.12870253033204443,"score_gpt":0.3506671786094581,"score_spread":0.2219646482774137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528615804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057875365,0.004162493,0.009162238,0.34279346,0.0033429556,0.0005792667,0.0003649757,0.00070054585,0.58101875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48882508,0.0027802929,0.009943007,0.4158059,0.0013910164,0.0006519034,0.00020146609,0.00012032107,0.08028094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863907,0.0034943696,0.0008664948,0.0011863499,0.004252586,0.003809497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762809,0.013861648,0.0018299749,0.0030668168,0.0034960709,0.0014644652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01949009,0.00046352283,0.0006681325,0.0018063354,0.011063225,0.016084956,0.0037834658,0.02128708,0.0057536387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027969733,0.0009526164,0.0016630515,0.002225839,0.008992973,0.008354676,0.007405366,0.016958985,0.0017540533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004039508,0.00017000445,0.0025265617,0.000092990376,0.000024265344,0.00092729036,0.004194128,0.00050706184,0.0009695634,0.90826917,0.06652944,0.015749106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014724868,0.0002684411,0.0118472725,0.001369643,0.0002652957,0.0012827938,0.009395074,0.002489093,0.00478353,0.11805854,0.849696,0.00039707238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076073736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07636005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076073736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009765027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03784773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15126187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544197200","doi":"","title":"Anchoring the Law in a Bed of Principle: A Critique of, and Proposal to Improve, Canadian and American Hearsay and Confrontation Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; Jurisprudence; Confrontation Clause; Admissible evidence; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Political science; Common law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.05538563774118799,"score_gpt":0.3946579378165523,"score_spread":0.3392723000753643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544197200","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007768731,0.024493845,0.037883718,0.69208056,0.003272775,0.00013448828,0.00012534228,0.0001661466,0.23407441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73208916,0.016000485,0.046157584,0.15725723,0.0037651144,0.00037715794,0.00012985842,0.00021109867,0.044012308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9471324,0.01254534,0.0017073217,0.0038988474,0.030318407,0.004397649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9638142,0.017952042,0.0013188149,0.0015557721,0.013811419,0.0015477941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041635793,0.00088977517,0.0015573774,0.008129521,0.023193043,0.022947412,0.008698398,0.018636925,0.003419638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05659211,0.00081984256,0.0016865693,0.0068014185,0.100685194,0.013021177,0.0070097675,0.02381768,0.0005785035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000420065,0.0000052003948,0.00008156335,0.000044609653,0.0000036298375,0.000039730487,0.0020660576,0.00009345427,0.00002684423,0.9873461,0.004677527,0.0056110546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042600986,0.000023534241,0.0010344451,0.00087315607,0.000049096325,0.00012686434,0.0051428126,0.0011154277,0.00023859105,0.76258373,0.22866985,0.00009981579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7691718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7830913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23082823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0810883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18314521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58833957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550586262","doi":"","title":"Halting Urban Sprawl: Smart Growth in Vancouver and Seattle","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Urbanization and City Planning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Urban sprawl; Smart growth; Geography; Engineering; Urban planning; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.04046923200102841,"score_gpt":0.32535629356890466,"score_spread":0.28488706156787624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550586262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5677976,0.011630076,0.0005702522,0.042156145,0.00035418087,0.00010965384,0.00016273108,0.000021925476,0.37719747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94195074,0.008182443,0.00029552166,0.005563514,0.000056788118,0.00006086088,0.00010711877,0.000018634291,0.04376429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861777,0.000470911,0.00004566209,0.00008591873,0.0003284295,0.00045120233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801135,0.00056465983,0.0001052043,0.000070634465,0.0008456463,0.00040247437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013805204,0.00016017303,0.00015630753,0.0010138013,0.010181675,0.004819106,0.0008187816,0.0016491887,0.0017583668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029702517,0.00019168282,0.00012338762,0.0018203019,0.003665716,0.0010898754,0.0019656536,0.0021603352,0.00013458444],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018118393,0.0002619541,0.08739118,0.0004531426,0.00007966366,0.0040179244,0.10741051,0.0033751766,0.0012399482,0.42608863,0.2024033,0.16709739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005903876,0.00009728361,0.11806735,0.0006593902,0.00008411522,0.00050190126,0.20411763,0.0011748065,0.0010709127,0.01895396,0.65508145,0.00013212123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90101177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97219527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098988235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017304003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021780182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19914234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552046944","doi":"","title":"Affording Discretion to Immigration Judges: A Comparison of Removal Proceedings in the United States and Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Discretion; Law; Political science; Commit; Immigration law; Convention; Waiver; Duty","score_opus":0.04280318097654043,"score_gpt":0.35181468779765557,"score_spread":0.3090115068211151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552046944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68573886,0.008196525,0.00068707584,0.017703453,0.00037304842,0.00034160234,0.0009245315,0.00008420199,0.2859507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794627,0.0034233434,0.00047316376,0.00457759,0.00006794082,0.000072899864,0.00048402295,0.0000432563,0.011395087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97151554,0.0018046763,0.0008070934,0.0010523024,0.012008942,0.012811474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722881,0.0069301277,0.002064533,0.00065411953,0.01239971,0.0056634624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006574871,0.00038444303,0.00091779785,0.007271646,0.028622596,0.01241872,0.0034026434,0.0039261696,0.0062169367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036492813,0.0007372965,0.0010595815,0.008946664,0.0076203914,0.0016268579,0.004660787,0.004342611,0.0004939959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013348795,0.00088872813,0.23282859,0.0010846162,0.00079782313,0.007496982,0.13848944,0.0060826,0.0036905291,0.34569213,0.12082082,0.1407928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040813067,0.00023052556,0.609116,0.0012435417,0.0006030196,0.0009419809,0.14053218,0.003056921,0.0016198871,0.009075502,0.23254742,0.0006249832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9913386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99775666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8695329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1304671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20342271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9466095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555915201","doi":"","title":"Legitimizing Elections Through the Regulation of Campaign Financing: A Comparative Constitutional Analysis and Hope for South Africa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.12079174063485275,"score_gpt":0.3611035223263063,"score_spread":0.24031178169145356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555915201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2846879,0.008843477,0.011478905,0.059589133,0.00016262573,0.00016465806,0.0001050792,0.000026241554,0.63494194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919194,0.0011554832,0.000716295,0.0012878969,0.00005152088,0.000056731642,0.000009885963,0.000007977811,0.004794742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505275,0.0026930154,0.00012176509,0.00033537592,0.00051798776,0.0012790876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925228,0.0054522934,0.0006518406,0.0006246966,0.0005106757,0.00023776386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010449015,0.0002664789,0.0004811101,0.0028035198,0.0066912286,0.009926245,0.0011535975,0.0039645005,0.0073979804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016045243,0.0003695891,0.0006136561,0.001982832,0.017350338,0.007921676,0.004461824,0.0042389836,0.00024529628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008879685,0.00000514201,0.00016518842,0.00001837145,0.0000030312326,0.00004998895,0.0011425279,0.00016957328,0.00008487729,0.99667716,0.00018403461,0.0014912094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015535201,0.0001072183,0.004518213,0.0005196993,0.00010909905,0.00021871697,0.011380234,0.0027381687,0.0019590582,0.851285,0.12695365,0.00005559654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012727662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012211387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012727662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0102534015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073046517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07439399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578619324","doi":"","title":"O Canada!: The Story of Rafferty, Oldman, and the Great Whale","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Political science; Enforcement; Environmental law; Natural resource; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Environmental governance; Federalism; Public administration; Law; Environmental planning; Business; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.01349511071269548,"score_gpt":0.21626043399382308,"score_spread":0.2027653232811276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578619324","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008249853,0.04766603,0.00024922605,0.7636911,0.0052549723,0.0000383425,0.00028203573,0.000052111693,0.17451629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15051968,0.04217816,0.0004054733,0.35536882,0.0023182451,0.00005235248,0.0001916803,0.0001175211,0.44884807],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99608433,0.00038744634,0.00004006323,0.00035499828,0.0015902229,0.0015429744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668735,0.0006346453,0.000096480144,0.00007568214,0.001338093,0.0011677869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022546698,0.000562936,0.00045935716,0.0014256333,0.042489417,0.011906755,0.0022356682,0.011772965,0.009738859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063096476,0.0005002631,0.0004297192,0.0022803338,0.013022825,0.0044839806,0.0022224847,0.012645085,0.0014485326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019422168,0.000017833052,0.0007274567,0.000052366944,0.000011203637,0.00059841754,0.005583605,0.00006575299,0.00008326746,0.056395076,0.91953945,0.016906148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060509374,0.0000050191693,0.0010988232,0.0000986193,0.0000069450994,0.00010334573,0.006988326,0.000034432465,0.000059963157,0.002890263,0.98868304,0.000025149899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9837832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060259234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060259234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.113999344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43721342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597732504","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Alternative Constitutional Regimes on Religious Freedom in Canada and England","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.030434983050223664,"score_gpt":0.3358827832908558,"score_spread":0.3054478002406321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597732504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.591897,0.008747415,0.00085402065,0.035647415,0.00023088726,0.000111649795,0.0007918458,0.000035837147,0.36168396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98178035,0.0017749578,0.0003801857,0.0019003042,0.000027808508,0.000021870654,0.000106512394,0.000013371049,0.013994617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895034,0.0011084694,0.00022397819,0.00064885,0.0036090547,0.0049062436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99209726,0.0025143456,0.0006868318,0.00039558698,0.0026901658,0.001615819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003888379,0.00023171182,0.0006079259,0.0032145998,0.01556426,0.008702244,0.0018717606,0.0020763099,0.0059673334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016626209,0.00031541043,0.0005429167,0.0035282031,0.013216172,0.0018767759,0.0036209507,0.0036185724,0.00022637977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028054218,0.000058738755,0.017287018,0.00016536622,0.000062816245,0.0009861458,0.016893793,0.0016691866,0.0010143599,0.91939473,0.008626875,0.033560347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061574095,0.00018520313,0.30903628,0.001304593,0.00044851124,0.0005112686,0.06501017,0.004269388,0.0027450167,0.08075117,0.534488,0.00063463266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99547017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1985906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1985906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13407664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9295213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W195299124","doi":"","title":"Are the Outward Processing Provisions in the South Korean Free Trade Agreements Consistent with the Law of the World Trade Organization","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exportation; Tariff; International trade; Free trade zone; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Business; State (computer science); Product (mathematics); Free trade agreement; Free trade; Economy; Political science; Economics; Law; China","score_opus":0.05784283212176344,"score_gpt":0.30834547554042296,"score_spread":0.2505026434186595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W195299124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026106998,0.0015569229,0.004719737,0.017062737,0.0015160124,0.00017860459,0.0006914205,0.00013740019,0.9480303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5114766,0.0033613273,0.0075678965,0.0444162,0.00079613196,0.0004222181,0.0017387646,0.00031252528,0.42990845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679923,0.0007239671,0.00030634517,0.000636624,0.0009343503,0.0005994316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958255,0.0006038503,0.0010387601,0.0010436146,0.0012238994,0.00026441118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033159538,0.00035805942,0.00024183109,0.000517709,0.0020492803,0.006758641,0.00068005186,0.0029815643,0.018221356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058632507,0.00034454445,0.00043234022,0.0011292584,0.003190661,0.005377236,0.0016038502,0.0029796301,0.010008741],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011542056,0.000079938276,0.0061619985,0.00020959266,0.000021311987,0.0006850672,0.0035153045,0.00024732464,0.0018566544,0.85088766,0.08299526,0.05322449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028260642,0.000025690388,0.0037108397,0.00020116243,0.000014824705,0.00029781583,0.0017874277,0.00010583404,0.0012660801,0.029420776,0.9631009,0.000040482813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008277507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009360885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018221356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016361224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003662215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060956478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W325602392","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Conventions in the Digital Era: Lessons from Iceland and Ireland","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Political science; Law; Democracy; Transparency (behavior); Sociology","score_opus":0.11886816650681017,"score_gpt":0.38013167639903,"score_spread":0.2612635098922198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W325602392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2655288,0.0068482226,0.0010472545,0.027792487,0.00021447576,0.00007501336,0.00018684032,0.00003022178,0.69827664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768414,0.0037287322,0.0007037285,0.0025678664,0.00009741852,0.000051925377,0.00012380432,0.000033283304,0.015851844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620926,0.0015707397,0.00020960296,0.00028655722,0.00071489264,0.00100892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961521,0.0022224037,0.0004545065,0.0004636103,0.00043956726,0.00026779415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006393341,0.00023108942,0.0004291921,0.0017947732,0.0054997047,0.013451616,0.0015400508,0.0017893253,0.002448583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006435696,0.00019308647,0.00034790556,0.0027323372,0.023040753,0.0071411324,0.00691498,0.0028895782,0.00031344846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095150084,0.00010113471,0.012664291,0.00029314996,0.000018747225,0.002059038,0.116089724,0.0012416795,0.00023520291,0.7973247,0.017395236,0.05248188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066348584,0.00005834551,0.030790823,0.0017344259,0.00003737768,0.0008202033,0.24691473,0.0010345983,0.0010770297,0.05604359,0.661347,0.00007553711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14155804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20288457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14155804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027407996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009046309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2814682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7052680692","doi":"","title":"Shielding the Public Interest: What Canada Can Learn from the United States in the Wake of <em>National Post and Globe & Mail</em>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Plasma Diagnostics and Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Privilege (computing); Globe; Presumption; Secrecy; Supreme court; State (computer science); Identity (music)","score_opus":0.05226854149639603,"score_gpt":0.2711397134934147,"score_spread":0.21887117199701867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7052680692","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030994453,0.037727058,0.00054319383,0.87051624,0.0020880613,0.000010177378,0.00014160275,0.000035866316,0.08583822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21565178,0.08460929,0.0018189597,0.6429927,0.0035292003,0.000042488555,0.00018989475,0.00010146765,0.05106415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898463,0.0016850901,0.00020844821,0.00083439815,0.004215412,0.003210339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794027,0.006513985,0.0005452535,0.0008665114,0.008457661,0.004213853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009139337,0.0006291746,0.0010460065,0.001752506,0.024979267,0.02423786,0.0030844586,0.018336015,0.0070043555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021139495,0.00040215443,0.0008816255,0.0030341272,0.028508551,0.013224433,0.0040734406,0.01972181,0.0010994498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035359804,0.000036623216,0.001338189,0.00017558485,0.000018962222,0.00041584027,0.004002401,0.0002386126,0.00013198782,0.6334483,0.31450158,0.045656476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025951895,0.000018375395,0.0026313986,0.0012022577,0.000043743836,0.00012256265,0.007665515,0.0001990542,0.00021120535,0.10649868,0.8812734,0.0001078072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96217144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9774918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09244589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09244589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2415912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.670745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}