{"meta":{"query_hash":"ed0d8c54769d","filters":{"venue":"Boston College law review"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ed0d8c54769d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Boston+College+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W1585322693","doi":"","title":"Oh Canada!: Antitrust Geographic Market Definition and the Reimportation of Prescription Drugs","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College law review","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical prescription; Market definition; Principle of legality; Context (archaeology); Prescription drug; State (computer science); Business; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Market structure; Medicine; Industrial organization; Geography","score_opus":0.011039550087904026,"score_gpt":0.20763935036357742,"score_spread":0.1965998002756734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585322693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05172481,0.12311434,0.000022932696,0.03208126,0.000518039,0.002925721,0.00009411397,0.00013629293,0.78938246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97944134,0.008924635,0.000091508846,0.010793058,0.00020580959,0.000041147254,0.000057927733,0.000011044743,0.00043349777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909073,0.000040162453,0.00037074176,0.00014239515,0.0002461769,0.000109804285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992718,0.000042531665,0.00040352868,0.00016354154,0.000108835855,0.000009722443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059151085,0.00010988776,0.00024510841,0.00004896409,0.00015743732,0.00005264803,0.00009211768,0.000029799497,0.00029156942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008357861,0.00007891973,0.000059354486,0.00031698812,0.00008763216,0.0005359589,0.00002941581,0.00006993533,0.000006852203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033231707,0.000015123094,0.00051468133,0.0012770416,0.000011814685,9.541935e-7,0.000008243713,7.021506e-7,0.000005436216,0.9772233,0.018840278,0.00206921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005327716,0.0000027996507,0.005581384,0.00072082225,0.00011745383,0.0000017290163,0.000029860195,0.0001855339,0.000010129702,0.0008402051,0.99187714,0.00010015193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3646995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40193853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9763831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015956713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028728324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.639531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1864625425","doi":"","title":"The Constitutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico's Legal Status Reconsidered","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutionality; International law; Originalism; Treaty; Municipal law","score_opus":0.017918148097918234,"score_gpt":0.3145785384309697,"score_spread":0.29666039033305147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1864625425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0117947515,0.33951852,0.00011207468,0.04794032,0.001412143,0.0051764934,0.001174488,0.000287894,0.5925833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95527476,0.04099988,0.000026525306,0.002400748,0.000062927975,0.000028147531,0.00003879387,0.0000065710697,0.00116166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751735,0.0006701767,0.00065983384,0.00021513404,0.0005476767,0.00038985844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827117,0.00040265496,0.0004907645,0.00018028007,0.00051402464,0.00014112552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00200831,0.00013433093,0.00042965444,0.000014977513,0.0012434066,0.00008532161,0.00022376928,0.00010473335,0.00011189461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021815863,0.00010206898,0.000105870924,0.0006888744,0.0004331014,0.00034127786,0.000019182142,0.00012223066,0.000016021762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013784505,0.00010062711,0.00026840135,0.00013562987,0.000030353785,0.0000042260613,0.00010567291,7.555576e-7,0.000021047283,0.8939839,0.10279118,0.0025444268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024762732,0.00005986766,0.00031131212,0.0006609849,0.00004662025,0.0000012690195,0.00013429017,0.0000022305533,0.000046670906,0.0041711493,0.99418235,0.0001356046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017867688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02841524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024056941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010329253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98931366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893646680","doi":"","title":"Safe Injection Sites and the Federal \"Crack House\" Statute","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College law review","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science; Surrender; State (computer science); Settlement (finance); Business; Public administration; Finance","score_opus":0.0433548126287372,"score_gpt":0.3439568222167163,"score_spread":0.3006020095879791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893646680","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19373731,0.38274324,0.00016359054,0.07144761,0.0014794262,0.012345663,0.00023650793,0.0010298246,0.33681682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76615036,0.13999407,0.0017365682,0.064910114,0.001780019,0.0002814995,0.000059147802,0.00021018324,0.024878062],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983514,0.00024992498,0.0004377651,0.00033803543,0.00032517806,0.0002976861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879783,0.00019668727,0.000151744,0.00051950436,0.00017586458,0.00015837878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083265395,0.00022532539,0.00065823016,0.000033473065,0.00039473528,0.000035819565,0.00011309744,0.00008232193,0.00026018088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003360193,0.00013856433,0.00010847316,0.00036488366,0.0006366526,0.00013376583,0.00008966622,0.00024790305,0.0005392174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018165443,0.0003743617,0.0019203833,0.009343653,0.00042631157,0.00015202923,0.0035529344,5.2136073e-7,0.0005372431,0.22734344,0.69011784,0.06441477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023591346,0.0005311182,0.0005561763,0.002168144,0.00030876306,0.00033568963,0.00034139,0.000058708865,0.00016238978,0.0003670573,0.9926165,0.00019497931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024782345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009202185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.572413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068418056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6930728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122782050","doi":"","title":"Alternatives to the Gift and Estate Tax","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College law review","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Gift tax; Estate tax; Estate; Business; Tax reform; Economics; Ad valorem tax; Public economics; Finance","score_opus":0.0450443009215645,"score_gpt":0.2608421437009725,"score_spread":0.21579784277940797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122782050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057817334,0.3353858,0.0018526058,0.217859,0.0007716773,0.0018841574,0.0011943592,0.00007896971,0.43519172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5316758,0.41529772,0.0005774855,0.025067907,0.00015868308,0.0003404389,0.0000017931103,0.000028635997,0.026851555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931157,0.000017685463,0.00028815097,0.00022044822,0.000025771136,0.00013638947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994789,0.0000539367,0.0001693464,0.00022653317,0.000021898848,0.000049412658],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002847961,0.00009368417,0.00027848803,0.000021398371,0.00014178235,0.000018482631,0.00014883341,0.000012639968,0.00024742552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010270622,0.000055631754,0.00005127868,0.00013230961,0.000062853556,0.00008780739,0.00007825911,0.000030720304,0.001083351],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028953448,0.000008875656,0.00075348123,0.00010377841,0.00001932432,0.0000012526629,0.000055191078,1.4068401e-7,0.0000018226494,0.95435107,0.03161451,0.013087677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014540377,0.000025433439,0.0035447148,0.0003417173,0.0000035961555,0.0000027455903,0.000010936135,0.0000019136821,0.0000082736215,0.0047547426,0.9910589,0.00010162189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008049684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020877903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9594444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002251679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005126854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992072811","doi":"","title":"Investment Disputes <em>Oltre lo Stato</em>: On Global Administrative Law, and Fair and Equitable Treatment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Boston College law review","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Treaty; Investment (military); International investment; International law; Normative; State (computer science); International economic law; Bilateral investment treaty","score_opus":0.03334850022957305,"score_gpt":0.309836684354749,"score_spread":0.27648818412517595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992072811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011456732,0.32199228,0.0000020784619,0.00033537697,0.00029788207,0.0064277444,0.015611139,0.00038806707,0.6548309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016923985,0.2119502,0.0031605526,0.009802069,0.0010533199,0.003074671,0.0024180016,0.00282584,0.76402295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928131,0.00085487386,0.0012877878,0.0022911031,0.0012755183,0.0014775808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954261,0.0002187375,0.0012968752,0.0018109155,0.00019005196,0.0010572982],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008242053,0.002209824,0.0034570792,0.00015528551,0.0004977478,0.0003418351,0.0005747971,0.00065449893,0.003990003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009696079,0.0017472468,0.0004208194,0.00081753597,0.001191597,0.00025876416,0.00048797508,0.00025806556,0.0049762814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011614719,0.00054685003,0.00002210655,0.0039104633,0.000682036,0.00023467302,0.00005616352,5.6092485e-8,0.0000076026054,0.40101588,0.5924597,0.0009483678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024677326,0.003068279,0.000035402292,0.0227619,0.001551276,0.00016992106,0.00005750451,0.0000047108992,0.000044392862,0.00085464964,0.96747196,0.0015122773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006413356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0328298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4001612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016264287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007632834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010340360","doi":"","title":"Human-Nonhuman Chimeras: A Regulatory Proposal on the Blurring of Species Lines","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Boston College law review","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chimera (genetics); Legislation; Legislature; Statutory law; Parliament; Patent law; Criticism","score_opus":0.04358077939127274,"score_gpt":0.32619289376496985,"score_spread":0.2826121143736971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010340360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002865647,0.25538364,4.9640045e-7,0.008454931,0.00022914883,0.0048004,0.00006351412,0.00036002503,0.7304213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007929445,0.12005909,0.00078323344,0.0062277312,0.0018745592,0.000665846,0.00006132174,0.00077347516,0.8616253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793494,0.00009508064,0.0006326907,0.0005559568,0.00047235985,0.00030897104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762595,0.000035442332,0.0005933002,0.0015727514,0.000098567,0.000073974756],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004921641,0.0004123597,0.0013207061,0.00015816742,0.00014697657,0.0000063148245,0.00031071992,0.00027877124,0.0012186148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002350026,0.00024169586,0.00028164734,0.0003430707,0.0005973239,0.000019509298,0.00009345024,0.00053531106,0.000090086316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014049946,0.00013526542,0.000021544995,0.01888434,0.00010163002,0.000035638015,0.0000063161556,3.653393e-8,0.00007792615,0.6371434,0.3430196,0.00056030334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035851035,0.00032757473,0.00018319351,0.052890167,0.00021923085,0.000046065652,0.000018910972,4.4839723e-8,0.0007116384,0.00078150706,0.9442574,0.00020579161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021121612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020511329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63636184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016294487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036418624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}