{"meta":{"query_hash":"ed0d8c54769d","filters":{"venue":"Boston College law review"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ed0d8c54769d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Boston+College+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W1585322693","doi":"","title":"Oh Canada!: Antitrust Geographic Market Definition and the Reimportation of Prescription Drugs","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College law review","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical prescription; Market definition; Principle of legality; Context (archaeology); Prescription drug; State (computer science); Business; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Market structure; Medicine; Industrial organization; Geography","score_opus":0.011039550087904026,"score_gpt":0.20763935036357742,"score_spread":0.1965998002756734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585322693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022031842,0.0102304965,0.003503688,0.15459442,0.0008720495,0.00009754386,0.00043334244,0.00008063559,0.808156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7519406,0.008441649,0.003001156,0.086887784,0.00077010266,0.00008702156,0.00018310016,0.00006294932,0.14862573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947143,0.0006099662,0.00012173667,0.00047870562,0.0025123584,0.0015628609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972211,0.0010129911,0.00027779362,0.00015516212,0.001081121,0.00025179438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021737982,0.00027570172,0.00031747823,0.0014220596,0.012610549,0.010933089,0.0015949142,0.007908552,0.006078294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051687267,0.0003603098,0.0005061832,0.001981651,0.012915031,0.004268569,0.0025099623,0.0058425195,0.00042980563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045545144,0.0000050823483,0.00047706216,0.000012749621,0.0000023960308,0.00018115951,0.0008094572,0.00010936194,0.000058537287,0.9708783,0.024908438,0.002552904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043139768,0.000019180581,0.0070050545,0.00030141458,0.00003713416,0.0003565544,0.0055794814,0.001197464,0.00058092474,0.16032113,0.824447,0.00011153744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92030835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9477122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07969165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04912121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056435216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35640097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1864625425","doi":"","title":"The Constitutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico's Legal Status Reconsidered","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutionality; International law; Originalism; Treaty; Municipal law","score_opus":0.017918148097918234,"score_gpt":0.3145785384309697,"score_spread":0.29666039033305147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1864625425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4498767,0.0035568585,0.00578546,0.040973887,0.00022737824,0.0001429755,0.0002203004,0.00006783144,0.49914858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800498,0.0006058644,0.00071790087,0.002241614,0.000052434763,0.000075567295,0.000024473378,0.000018328281,0.016213989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839383,0.0006340275,0.00006329578,0.00030407397,0.00015787731,0.00044682683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988348,0.00052474474,0.0001348565,0.00026618474,0.00017019405,0.00006924705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037459652,0.00019277226,0.00032221925,0.00052792806,0.0069826064,0.0063850195,0.0014873226,0.0027457294,0.0030887271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038183897,0.00026453403,0.00032152113,0.00074766023,0.011512029,0.0036056838,0.004326781,0.0040580286,0.00016104734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019090867,0.0000050067474,0.0009700401,0.00002003438,0.0000052380265,0.00026622048,0.011100743,0.0001881043,0.0005934777,0.9801405,0.0012374186,0.0054541244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010261699,0.00012870981,0.018396815,0.00055385684,0.00022287873,0.0005693004,0.058742475,0.0032944544,0.005747677,0.36654428,0.5454493,0.0002476238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19991322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18919651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19991322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008702022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007622422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39749914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893646680","doi":"","title":"Safe Injection Sites and the Federal \"Crack House\" Statute","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College law review","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science; Surrender; State (computer science); Settlement (finance); Business; Public administration; Finance","score_opus":0.0433548126287372,"score_gpt":0.3439568222167163,"score_spread":0.3006020095879791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893646680","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015090905,0.015824117,0.0014945134,0.8381531,0.060699295,0.000052389078,0.0003635937,0.00024051357,0.08166337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014492252,0.00455972,0.0010983513,0.92558897,0.023136245,0.000090808106,0.0002520858,0.00010303595,0.030678505],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773089,0.004772787,0.0014111609,0.0020835907,0.009961027,0.004462539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97043926,0.019580044,0.0014497865,0.0012354727,0.00510365,0.0021917715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016231567,0.0008336743,0.000982533,0.0019012892,0.008082338,0.011240316,0.0044225734,0.038105518,0.0083975615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043597627,0.0014758524,0.0019820114,0.0014735817,0.0128501,0.008974082,0.0042349948,0.038293287,0.0039611957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024168363,0.000027998358,0.00028856244,0.000058041558,0.000007801579,0.000082132196,0.00019850959,0.000104798615,0.00007345059,0.12138526,0.86741793,0.01033127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003486429,0.000028120057,0.0010827935,0.00040617614,0.000019924766,0.00006957764,0.00015798876,0.0001658197,0.00013712511,0.014677158,0.9831645,0.000056017994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104373015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14122345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104373015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0131336395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028737713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20753098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122782050","doi":"","title":"Alternatives to the Gift and Estate Tax","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College law review","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Gift tax; Estate tax; Estate; Business; Tax reform; Economics; Ad valorem tax; Public economics; Finance","score_opus":0.0450443009215645,"score_gpt":0.2608421437009725,"score_spread":0.21579784277940797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122782050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18496466,0.007561814,0.026876597,0.05492408,0.0016967843,0.00019387006,0.0005294821,0.00011554065,0.72313714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91206855,0.0023472167,0.004909666,0.00830458,0.00048190975,0.00011088376,0.00016832876,0.000026307327,0.07158266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99511576,0.001361189,0.00025999983,0.0005826639,0.0020339084,0.00064645486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99657875,0.0013144347,0.0005205102,0.0005999509,0.0007478781,0.00023850452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049888645,0.00020278597,0.00031201437,0.00095809053,0.0019160376,0.0036429674,0.0009845495,0.003934796,0.0058373315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011732889,0.00020376107,0.00062677334,0.0012514801,0.0047738133,0.004612441,0.002012626,0.0051565794,0.00055286137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011203786,0.000012364427,0.00032643366,0.000006476943,0.0000016594774,0.000020136375,0.00011950603,0.00014680496,0.000027043247,0.9941549,0.0019149022,0.0032587396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005644804,0.0001100227,0.0044345367,0.00024457485,0.000022761398,0.00032955557,0.00095081143,0.0021821747,0.00046551126,0.6225984,0.36855328,0.000051998402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008968905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0116427615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008968905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00422548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00477911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030658126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992072811","doi":"","title":"Investment Disputes <em>Oltre lo Stato</em>: On Global Administrative Law, and Fair and Equitable Treatment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Boston College law review","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Treaty; Investment (military); International investment; International law; Normative; State (computer science); International economic law; Bilateral investment treaty","score_opus":0.03334850022957305,"score_gpt":0.309836684354749,"score_spread":0.27648818412517595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992072811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032541887,0.032612845,0.0018308687,0.062295575,0.0011586492,0.00004195023,0.00019398477,0.00007827087,0.8985336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24292365,0.043509677,0.0029391265,0.08297819,0.004397233,0.00027731503,0.00034273864,0.00022684534,0.6224052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966293,0.0010309702,0.00011432403,0.00036136157,0.0013638391,0.00050031027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983581,0.00085305714,0.0001641435,0.0001505905,0.00038098215,0.00009319342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027111291,0.0004326841,0.0003018657,0.0013092664,0.002978286,0.0076339114,0.0011231246,0.005636622,0.020458288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005357172,0.0002607253,0.0004386799,0.0016937662,0.005825947,0.0042338623,0.0020082644,0.005736471,0.004394203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036955576,0.000013424698,0.00011682577,0.000054621207,0.0000025317697,0.000052629788,0.00035218275,0.00009704428,0.000073438576,0.9095019,0.08054747,0.009184227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001283866,0.000014814543,0.00091258925,0.00038323642,0.0000083633395,0.00007624641,0.00038629762,0.00019473546,0.00024006978,0.08170924,0.91604674,0.00001482069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026467636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030622032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026467636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006968754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067199967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06843978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010340360","doi":"","title":"Human-Nonhuman Chimeras: A Regulatory Proposal on the Blurring of Species Lines","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Boston College law review","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chimera (genetics); Legislation; Legislature; Statutory law; Parliament; Patent law; Criticism","score_opus":0.04358077939127274,"score_gpt":0.32619289376496985,"score_spread":0.2826121143736971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010340360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01384528,0.010018522,0.038504794,0.16178435,0.0035031058,0.00045793963,0.00031427943,0.00047219242,0.7710996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30272838,0.010930191,0.03607739,0.37808594,0.0025567266,0.001050734,0.00026242135,0.00023281512,0.2680755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824028,0.0055687083,0.0009412443,0.002533668,0.0068206335,0.0017329972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98471236,0.009567998,0.00085436524,0.0015330785,0.002733769,0.0005984027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022677405,0.00078036304,0.0006306863,0.0014161222,0.0054449323,0.0073167044,0.003983982,0.025154317,0.005963098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027372383,0.00083803054,0.0014588305,0.0009843769,0.014281692,0.005547091,0.0045708497,0.013426317,0.0013205569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012739254,0.000023550638,0.00020530744,0.000030264662,0.000004685044,0.00017245508,0.0005965223,0.00019807044,0.0003671401,0.96769565,0.022579363,0.00811421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096754105,0.00012861023,0.0009636352,0.00057573343,0.00008167646,0.0009102597,0.00075257523,0.0011270143,0.002844544,0.17604595,0.8163801,0.000093185685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057228733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069083035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057228733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006659383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022287725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11993104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}