{"meta":{"query_hash":"df3222638083","filters":{"venue":"Brazilian Political Science Review"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/df3222638083","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Brazilian+Political+Science+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1574928950","doi":"10.1590/1981-3879201100010001","title":"How Innovative Was the Poupatempo Experience in Brazil? Institutional Bypass as a New Form of Institutional Change","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brazilian Political Science Review","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Institutional change; Feature (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Institutional theory; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Social science; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.1696671992620758,"score_gpt":0.3898206446642239,"score_spread":0.2201534454021481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574928950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2402966,0.006227155,0.0006412013,0.19010544,0.0019470144,0.0038149087,0.00003747824,0.0001202858,0.5568099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886478,0.002030626,0.00042497672,0.007875172,0.000117731775,0.00010632304,0.0000024364483,0.000003631632,0.0007912919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761456,0.00008111829,0.00045422016,0.00036519312,0.0006532567,0.00083167624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875665,0.00006639867,0.00013355169,0.00023039881,0.00022302863,0.00058996025],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018657264,0.0001422299,0.00027471044,0.00015288453,0.00058052875,0.000078623394,0.00087397295,0.00005838352,0.0009780749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024687198,0.00010237586,0.00006887212,0.0020670048,0.0038097042,0.001313532,0.00018194145,0.00015410902,0.00011858698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040275922,0.0000468648,0.0032607333,0.00004789689,0.0000021716196,0.0000034033533,0.007648665,2.2044077e-8,0.000012186888,0.92685455,0.0001084908,0.062011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060155033,0.0000935043,0.26719797,0.0025423467,0.000014473678,0.000047095033,0.006475326,0.000023658062,0.0003663546,0.0392243,0.6827745,0.0006389532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059340065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014735558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8876302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000708505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005147124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743516412","doi":"10.1590/1981-3821201700020004","title":"Accountability, Corruption and Local Government: Mapping the Control Steps","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brazilian Political Science Review","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais","keywords":"Accountability; Language change; Argument (complex analysis); Public administration; Political science; Order (exchange); Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Control (management); Law; Sociology; Public relations; Business; Economics; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.0570564318598814,"score_gpt":0.3525366913361334,"score_spread":0.295480259476252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743516412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09200733,0.007565961,0.0035103448,0.33089083,0.0020632378,0.0031884871,0.00004334071,0.00013629455,0.56059414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98933417,0.003695833,0.000047598536,0.0061234483,0.00010885986,0.000026178268,2.2758037e-7,0.0000033233025,0.0006603876],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997918,0.000105832034,0.0002790412,0.00033011715,0.00061879685,0.0007482009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873376,0.00014584292,0.0001252908,0.0004396043,0.000068816444,0.00048666706],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050539155,0.00009920363,0.00020644617,0.000014492252,0.002716314,0.000554439,0.00081581844,0.000037876613,0.0005222997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017128047,0.00006936469,0.000056752633,0.00010945916,0.004205781,0.00059737155,0.0002152199,0.00011209903,0.00020633395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020248247,0.000019207697,0.0144815575,0.000109373126,0.0000033264148,8.5891844e-7,0.00033038596,7.554028e-8,0.000009675158,0.45631865,0.00018035673,0.52854455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024313101,0.000013514701,0.5557895,0.0006406744,0.000022313026,0.000008076637,0.002114121,0.00021705238,0.0000027033745,0.0033284877,0.4374066,0.00021385543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011035625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005267199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8973268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006990036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042174655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386832151","doi":"10.1590/1981-3831200700020003","title":"Women and Candidate Quality in the Elections for the Senate: Brazil and the United States in Comparative Perspective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brazilian Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Quality (philosophy); Probit model; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Probit; Demographic economics; Political economy; Economics; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.06957779708871191,"score_gpt":0.45811700025793484,"score_spread":0.3885392031692229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386832151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69933426,0.013863872,0.0003322537,0.26646307,0.0001319906,0.003867913,0.000029611203,0.000021213616,0.0159558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895312,0.005505302,0.000019357485,0.0047405334,0.00004152591,0.00008319364,0.0000012186204,0.0000021198564,0.00007550834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997759,0.000583001,0.00027150195,0.00023250139,0.00035622687,0.000797805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973394,0.002109513,0.00005794398,0.0001511281,0.00016148269,0.0001805195],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011625767,0.00008355286,0.00018978979,0.000081309714,0.0010006252,0.00016017912,0.0003001316,0.000026809294,0.000008037168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015982491,0.000038477756,0.00003105386,0.0013542094,0.0040531377,0.00013654608,0.00004528593,0.00016771258,0.000001375547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000924791,0.000020107242,0.0010684762,0.00003744914,0.0000033464744,3.7864032e-7,0.03803672,9.752048e-7,0.0000030320102,0.96030545,0.00006829543,0.00044651865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009201734,0.000045811725,0.25654426,0.00018400101,0.00002885635,0.000009651341,0.3191099,0.00048022714,0.000024288498,0.3988168,0.023633758,0.0002023014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044067994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021922711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5614887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031204452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027154057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}