{"meta":{"query_hash":"df3222638083","filters":{"venue":"Brazilian Political Science Review"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/df3222638083","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Brazilian+Political+Science+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1574928950","doi":"10.1590/1981-3879201100010001","title":"How Innovative Was the Poupatempo Experience in Brazil? Institutional Bypass as a New Form of Institutional Change","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brazilian Political Science Review","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Institutional change; Feature (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Institutional theory; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Social science; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.1696671992620758,"score_gpt":0.3898206446642239,"score_spread":0.2201534454021481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574928950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90573823,0.0026189375,0.0030468584,0.025414575,0.000103573766,0.00008579748,0.000047187918,0.000029020415,0.06291588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966168,0.00064956833,0.0002681146,0.00051957736,0.000018411938,0.000020286188,0.000010028964,0.0000077698005,0.0018894719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972154,0.0014721667,0.000067057146,0.00025654573,0.0004136994,0.00057508814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706274,0.0012301992,0.00060423336,0.000299263,0.0003130655,0.0004904621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049968907,0.0002108133,0.00046970058,0.00083832565,0.0050783167,0.004989357,0.00058679807,0.001687231,0.0018283484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00866062,0.00021731741,0.0002518938,0.0012262593,0.009491669,0.0039949487,0.0037662026,0.0017525677,0.00016315187],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011490047,0.0001498146,0.037395637,0.0005941258,0.000053912478,0.0035158286,0.32565904,0.0009856543,0.0041988185,0.53233445,0.0054382756,0.08955956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006890515,0.00048423,0.088355795,0.0013362047,0.00009859087,0.0034799483,0.27131978,0.0019326907,0.003009557,0.068864726,0.56089264,0.00015695015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011839953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022067012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011839953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045048823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059578205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0326854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743516412","doi":"10.1590/1981-3821201700020004","title":"Accountability, Corruption and Local Government: Mapping the Control Steps","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brazilian Political Science Review","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais","keywords":"Accountability; Language change; Argument (complex analysis); Public administration; Political science; Order (exchange); Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Control (management); Law; Sociology; Public relations; Business; Economics; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.0570564318598814,"score_gpt":0.3525366913361334,"score_spread":0.295480259476252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743516412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37144572,0.28011206,0.02747539,0.05329641,0.00030786777,0.00016455998,0.00044221393,0.00013637675,0.26661947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97247237,0.024119884,0.0014661894,0.00038692617,0.0000434108,0.000026080694,0.000056452885,0.000014285128,0.001414449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961266,0.0024272634,0.00014635954,0.00029643532,0.00067565107,0.00032768238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916734,0.004666386,0.0016291164,0.00049192685,0.0012860243,0.00025309887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036469481,0.00032516135,0.0004372996,0.0054180687,0.0016314968,0.0042413473,0.00062502816,0.0006648891,0.002582385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012433302,0.0002946207,0.00044290908,0.0071155373,0.0067127217,0.0044943546,0.0026102245,0.001245422,0.00018868282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053472537,0.00008594413,0.08103096,0.002350337,0.00013359742,0.00038409332,0.025292916,0.003979967,0.00045216593,0.6045346,0.0041028718,0.27759907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026860173,0.00016224915,0.339801,0.011982453,0.00032339434,0.0006373626,0.06877305,0.008378481,0.0010315172,0.29493538,0.2738435,0.00010475243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06063473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053003993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06063473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059824055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007909016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12056363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386832151","doi":"10.1590/1981-3831200700020003","title":"Women and Candidate Quality in the Elections for the Senate: Brazil and the United States in Comparative Perspective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brazilian Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Quality (philosophy); Probit model; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Probit; Demographic economics; Political economy; Economics; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.06957779708871191,"score_gpt":0.45811700025793484,"score_spread":0.3885392031692229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386832151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90423286,0.0048436616,0.0002629231,0.008617271,0.00009107147,0.000017107188,0.00017829484,0.0000055798414,0.08175131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981007,0.00040700697,0.000028750446,0.00011258778,0.000028613462,0.000002741105,0.000025254856,0.0000029677954,0.0012914254],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970156,0.0015015639,0.00008366553,0.00016931054,0.000488504,0.00074139994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99314535,0.003063486,0.0018055349,0.0002172342,0.0007376252,0.0010309083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004557989,0.00014743498,0.00044088127,0.0022112234,0.002490328,0.003594873,0.00037043882,0.00065469224,0.007501715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012504181,0.00015225935,0.00032142858,0.003732206,0.0032013417,0.001315171,0.0020945978,0.00080053316,0.00030367437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003885577,0.00022661842,0.70376474,0.0002913956,0.00022532129,0.001047682,0.08137396,0.0005750268,0.0006856378,0.1498517,0.007182689,0.054386687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029284916,0.00013755762,0.8546364,0.00026085682,0.0001021952,0.00035306148,0.08491257,0.00051236915,0.00036997208,0.0060458067,0.052600667,0.00003927963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046192225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13760392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046192225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026290705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019585795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091846704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}