{"meta":{"query_hash":"6ddf4441cc0b","filters":{"venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6ddf4441cc0b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Brigham+Young+University+Journal+of+Public+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1550600082","doi":"","title":"The Case Against Same-Sex Marriage in Canada: Law and Policy Considerations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Meaning (existential); Law; Sociology; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Gender studies; Psychology","score_opus":0.01853885757025264,"score_gpt":0.23443851488100978,"score_spread":0.21589965731075714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550600082","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042332754,0.020336729,0.0009418023,0.75578874,0.00093653717,0.0000822025,0.00018252821,0.00003193314,0.17936674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7224693,0.02081736,0.0013399591,0.2111604,0.00074606773,0.00009355295,0.000109217726,0.00003028075,0.043233912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877208,0.0015068735,0.00025693537,0.000707458,0.0035036292,0.006304266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886925,0.0051172907,0.0004948308,0.00020368418,0.0031452521,0.0023464381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071042953,0.00036275794,0.0006101659,0.0023350115,0.041205358,0.012773929,0.004682405,0.020976078,0.0066938624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020005513,0.00054824376,0.0007145021,0.004063612,0.017272903,0.004507616,0.004926934,0.013899875,0.00029761065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025539412,0.000025938727,0.003243939,0.0001331678,0.000012929938,0.001069097,0.012066162,0.0004297303,0.00019787805,0.91626567,0.0535054,0.013024653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010668674,0.000050844974,0.017801423,0.0019655847,0.00015713868,0.00097612216,0.06722191,0.0031896557,0.000683286,0.19494848,0.71259415,0.0003046605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9930837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14280668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14280668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29807636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99422276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589306392","doi":"","title":"Parent, Child, Husband, Wife: When Recognition Fails, Tragedy Ensues","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy (event); Wife; Narrative; Confusion; Promiscuity; Drama; Social recognition; Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Literature; Social psychology; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0659089534730652,"score_gpt":0.2354986400982929,"score_spread":0.16958968662522772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589306392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.349664,0.010381396,0.016615568,0.15786023,0.0021421097,0.00008486075,0.00015440775,0.00014921832,0.46294823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699451,0.0020805649,0.001032824,0.005142624,0.00010703106,0.000020245745,0.00002460773,0.00002100756,0.021625934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981993,0.0008891957,0.000063096755,0.00012682818,0.0003731179,0.00034842928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990671,0.0003133319,0.0001851317,0.000047018188,0.00016419977,0.00022326973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018665271,0.00015606746,0.00022390258,0.00029372406,0.005595645,0.002947079,0.00047616218,0.0022172756,0.0038122097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006281497,0.00016983677,0.00011008862,0.00043014335,0.006722557,0.0032907028,0.0031512117,0.0032929122,0.0007345183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027617163,0.000039261784,0.013171165,0.00007748261,0.000010090243,0.015658433,0.35755205,0.00015939785,0.00065083645,0.49816972,0.05404085,0.06044318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011779289,0.0000898014,0.012926213,0.0005358687,0.00001762958,0.027740538,0.38656417,0.00033261123,0.000865782,0.04971368,0.5211333,0.00006866715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03828996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04191594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03828996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025352922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006330658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076134205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785144732","doi":"","title":"Legalization of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Foundational Issues and Implications","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Assisted suicide; Jurisdiction; Legalization; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Judicial opinion; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Psychology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.21203425414382143,"score_gpt":0.4729004329198958,"score_spread":0.2608661787760744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785144732","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025156911,0.09366598,0.005057272,0.7419477,0.0030471343,0.0000948474,0.00010306434,0.000029903467,0.13089715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8662223,0.046918064,0.0025701295,0.074548945,0.003524199,0.000172486,0.00007924015,0.000036143996,0.005928404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803524,0.0090131955,0.0009282899,0.0012172027,0.0048436653,0.0036452704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92327756,0.05666729,0.00401035,0.001556535,0.010874998,0.003613238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027093383,0.0005607955,0.001172623,0.003874552,0.018091774,0.014511726,0.006145864,0.015072275,0.003551706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049929608,0.00047751144,0.00059697736,0.003606782,0.106469885,0.016135082,0.009331178,0.016641567,0.00022342915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000169466,0.00003442072,0.000942014,0.00028971845,0.000008823127,0.000582397,0.013488357,0.0002490988,0.0000382619,0.9575832,0.0066821133,0.020084545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024077406,0.000046649726,0.006149167,0.0043877126,0.000020681391,0.00097217667,0.06863861,0.0007348484,0.00019323331,0.82656425,0.09216914,0.00009958881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44336408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43052742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44336408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.069747485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09324241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8815668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W783605720","doi":"","title":"The Effect of the United States Supreme Court's Decisions During the Last Quarter of the Nineteenth Century on Tribal Criminal Jurisdiction","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Original jurisdiction; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.00941201857367935,"score_gpt":0.23080994746625313,"score_spread":0.2213979288925738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W783605720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6386434,0.0034978115,0.00023645977,0.032688197,0.0009291691,0.000033880424,0.0006860406,0.000018710245,0.3232662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723316,0.0009119011,0.00010632632,0.008505903,0.00032199762,0.00001797024,0.00012446844,0.00003035865,0.017649483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966305,0.0007357958,0.000110486006,0.00034898758,0.00059963024,0.001574662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936474,0.0031088782,0.0007477021,0.00020539446,0.001354097,0.00093644776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00372925,0.00024342077,0.0004884888,0.0025485524,0.015174284,0.008322548,0.0011096098,0.0058953566,0.01210095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016228408,0.0005706966,0.0005358837,0.0024836005,0.007855503,0.002314078,0.0036001666,0.008763802,0.000901994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011293009,0.00073624094,0.054650262,0.00019791923,0.00021154282,0.003227589,0.06395381,0.002196929,0.002663382,0.6975105,0.11423033,0.059292227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002561632,0.00027730592,0.3830923,0.00100086,0.00030454868,0.00054218713,0.05181888,0.00085306715,0.0036495307,0.03871145,0.51926595,0.0002277457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29648483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5920641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29648483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014763557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071879085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5895182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W845056165","doi":"","title":"The Debates About Same-Sex Marriage in Canada and the United States: Controversy Over the Evolution of a Fundamental Social Institution","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Social institution; Political science; Same sex; Sociology; Genealogy; Gender studies; Law; Social science; History","score_opus":0.008276374304678785,"score_gpt":0.21062277891092468,"score_spread":0.2023464046062459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W845056165","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18460429,0.008283133,0.0015637644,0.54928,0.0009736618,0.00006653015,0.00026309496,0.000024792951,0.25494084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94397116,0.0022998536,0.0004933773,0.043086905,0.0003070047,0.000028554115,0.000046996764,0.000026446802,0.00973974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880475,0.002689909,0.00029724007,0.0009454489,0.0032862013,0.0047336533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803273,0.008075915,0.0008884015,0.00060111564,0.0057543055,0.004352964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014018047,0.00025431105,0.0010606591,0.0020268846,0.050401196,0.017173512,0.004932649,0.017281452,0.0051310994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031506967,0.0005058576,0.00070497853,0.0036620258,0.066824995,0.0056583923,0.006047614,0.021707492,0.00020747675],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003513638,0.000025834146,0.0020079974,0.000024501793,0.000012006239,0.00012778229,0.024947572,0.00017890395,0.00008467798,0.9556326,0.010726922,0.0061959336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022459253,0.00006538135,0.03876832,0.001307546,0.0001805342,0.00030684113,0.18806164,0.0017833235,0.0011206274,0.341069,0.42679343,0.00031866896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9798141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11709128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11709128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2579103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8495607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}