{"meta":{"query_hash":"6ddf4441cc0b","filters":{"venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6ddf4441cc0b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Brigham+Young+University+Journal+of+Public+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1550600082","doi":"","title":"The Case Against Same-Sex Marriage in Canada: Law and Policy Considerations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Meaning (existential); Law; Sociology; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Gender studies; Psychology","score_opus":0.01853885757025264,"score_gpt":0.23443851488100978,"score_spread":0.21589965731075714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550600082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37316582,0.0005107551,0.000034494115,0.013412979,0.0004612935,0.00015677206,0.000014645056,0.000009843086,0.6122334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820524,0.00016617404,0.000026562659,0.00059654744,0.00015602325,8.05411e-8,1.953981e-7,0.00000348142,0.00084568595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987421,0.00047292872,0.00019961892,0.00008413782,0.0002415531,0.00025968527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896616,0.00029424223,0.00018669268,0.00007065878,0.00026408493,0.00021816806],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009916875,0.00006699109,0.0001478282,0.000067970774,0.0016803368,0.00026593136,0.00013292814,0.000048141792,0.000023453344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004353282,0.00005501525,0.0000344479,0.00029326664,0.0003917786,0.00065453595,0.000023013872,0.00018083566,5.643977e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024000806,0.000010982848,0.0016751759,0.0000026648186,0.000019100595,0.0017556063,0.0017123354,0.0000040460886,0.000004566368,0.9935751,0.0010838815,0.00015416113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007934693,0.00002353408,0.0006435452,0.000026829573,0.000017804454,0.0010176526,0.062325526,0.0000059068475,0.000015782362,0.01785729,0.91711,0.00016262944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.986153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9757178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008720346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048596445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589306392","doi":"","title":"Parent, Child, Husband, Wife: When Recognition Fails, Tragedy Ensues","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy (event); Wife; Narrative; Confusion; Promiscuity; Drama; Social recognition; Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Literature; Social psychology; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0659089534730652,"score_gpt":0.2354986400982929,"score_spread":0.16958968662522772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589306392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29559785,0.00040671995,0.0004743454,0.00370144,0.001107183,0.0001748457,0.000030767074,0.0000913651,0.69841546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99349874,0.00090900797,0.00085267506,0.00022093065,0.00048219808,1.3061705e-7,0.000009243823,0.000008100667,0.004018993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983921,0.0004155071,0.00021372597,0.00015063102,0.0004930498,0.00033495354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864346,0.000036436242,0.0003500802,0.00011207901,0.0005609499,0.00029702226],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009922424,0.00011907359,0.00020542646,0.000032586093,0.0012279958,0.0001866394,0.00054312154,0.0002017197,0.0013623708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055953948,0.00010930089,0.00025868343,0.00025655978,0.0005477516,0.0023253348,0.000040998064,0.00038714928,0.00003277926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016246823,0.0007998957,0.013105626,0.000029042505,0.00073106604,0.0004189099,0.2522432,6.5033e-7,0.00008122406,0.68268985,0.042875603,0.0068625077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013834528,0.00013782672,0.006822178,0.00008871103,0.00020134526,0.00012325904,0.1168114,8.0580764e-7,0.00010178067,0.016132945,0.8578616,0.00033472158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022811312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004157512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.814986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022119732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020883056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785144732","doi":"","title":"Legalization of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Foundational Issues and Implications","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Assisted suicide; Jurisdiction; Legalization; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Judicial opinion; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Psychology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.21203425414382143,"score_gpt":0.4729004329198958,"score_spread":0.2608661787760744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785144732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41863212,0.00071919075,0.025605572,0.3333624,0.0012843008,0.0005254464,0.00008020644,0.000044346405,0.21974644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99501693,0.00044167018,0.0020489348,0.00029521904,0.00014321253,1.657194e-7,0.000008446491,0.0000068769054,0.0020385245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836147,0.00076463714,0.00032913705,0.00011385272,0.00027566243,0.00015525354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963929,0.00074672495,0.0012014888,0.0002346899,0.0012628186,0.00016139053],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028084095,0.000070203285,0.00020147406,0.00011874101,0.0023514756,0.00006703168,0.00031637642,0.0001745353,0.00012063641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003394206,0.000066718625,0.000034172,0.000078968034,0.00072158646,0.001585977,0.00017924664,0.0008717804,0.0000027233966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029422054,0.00004722673,0.097108506,0.000049836617,0.00007672954,0.000008893938,0.0007226141,2.3204709e-7,0.0002580354,0.898161,0.0027414141,0.000796101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013938925,0.000061950406,0.8346989,0.00017414839,0.000116169205,0.00011190775,0.0028810021,0.000029517634,0.000010362815,0.02392788,0.13650097,0.00009328395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014186677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015755746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8742331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010997903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004515274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W783605720","doi":"","title":"The Effect of the United States Supreme Court's Decisions During the Last Quarter of the Nineteenth Century on Tribal Criminal Jurisdiction","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Original jurisdiction; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.00941201857367935,"score_gpt":0.23080994746625313,"score_spread":0.2213979288925738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W783605720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9669428,0.000041079897,0.000028897966,0.0042054174,0.00039980336,0.00013575298,0.00004646206,0.000006121213,0.028193654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984476,0.00023258469,0.0000046402383,0.00007418304,0.00012941791,1.1400345e-7,0.0000015689316,0.000003254033,0.0011066113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765915,0.0010957151,0.00023174338,0.000074462405,0.00070164714,0.00023728046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798924,0.001057022,0.00035766122,0.0001981359,0.00030757848,0.00009038947],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009271809,0.000091030895,0.00014502776,0.000054725348,0.0019915937,0.00006626443,0.0007904951,0.000050479917,0.00010888259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001468065,0.00004096742,0.00023964903,0.00046909,0.0021172885,0.0002160646,0.000049841816,0.0002965575,0.0000017414931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039756813,0.00010839429,0.020399813,0.000008059596,0.00020772725,0.000009824918,0.0035876876,0.0009503231,0.00004387208,0.97038054,0.0032144063,0.00069179205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012552198,0.00034269845,0.10659577,0.00013023464,0.00026452812,0.00006467156,0.012113743,0.00004575767,0.00020217021,0.00031088578,0.87854975,0.00012458369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002959499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014130876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97006965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020872022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005158888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W845056165","doi":"","title":"The Debates About Same-Sex Marriage in Canada and the United States: Controversy Over the Evolution of a Fundamental Social Institution","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Social institution; Political science; Same sex; Sociology; Genealogy; Gender studies; Law; Social science; History","score_opus":0.008276374304678785,"score_gpt":0.21062277891092468,"score_spread":0.2023464046062459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W845056165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871536,0.00058047334,0.000111457106,0.0106143635,0.00013693386,0.00022049832,0.000013811252,0.000006883542,0.0011620175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99931926,0.00026725535,0.000010017646,0.00014510758,0.000069107446,2.7926345e-7,0.0000048442685,0.0000029591615,0.0001811928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990197,0.00018450325,0.0002398348,0.00008518435,0.000281752,0.00018903027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990745,0.00020816865,0.0003303755,0.00011499122,0.00023380788,0.000038120437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075389113,0.00007572903,0.00019870483,0.00010692799,0.00044037032,0.000030835334,0.00016102947,0.0000446962,0.0000052070786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014114933,0.000038664806,0.000052992196,0.00034100856,0.000944588,0.00019222866,0.000047566824,0.00028495933,1.0744321e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016716736,0.00009953924,0.34488025,0.0000410829,0.0001985949,0.00009734273,0.0008061917,0.000074850665,0.000112767724,0.64746404,0.003653224,0.00090043154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072467807,0.00011189417,0.90815216,0.000045854715,0.00009120693,0.0001795602,0.02339792,0.0003460296,0.000041046544,0.0041981754,0.056112763,0.000076581746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8752233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7268455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6432659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014933959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012228829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39051783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}