{"meta":{"query_hash":"dbaf8de7cf19","filters":{"venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy"},"cohort_total":52,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":52,"exported":52,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/dbaf8de7cf19","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=British+Journal+for+the+History+of+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W1966471514","doi":"10.1080/09608780600792067","title":"Alternative possibilities in descartes's fourth meditation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meditation; Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.04967137649723556,"score_gpt":0.23549721133796947,"score_spread":0.1858258348407339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966471514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18627486,0.0817474,0.0020768761,0.013748878,0.05338438,0.0022568502,0.00089041906,0.0001735328,0.65944684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97985935,0.000075721124,0.00010972614,0.00020316131,0.006205078,0.00002584386,0.000012085998,0.000024456713,0.013484587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883306,0.00007792868,0.00047786115,0.0001455658,0.00027557396,0.000190003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989666,0.00037817704,0.00027839636,0.00010614127,0.0002279459,0.00004276608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004178493,0.00012128841,0.0002278232,0.00012054115,0.00031965482,0.00006975258,0.00025205693,0.000037596245,0.00025501617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009415771,0.0001085939,0.00024020839,0.000027860302,0.0006868057,0.00034760902,0.00001764489,0.00028303702,0.000006000586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013795121,0.0003489434,0.000012719971,0.000062428306,0.00005242279,0.00005010008,0.0081270365,0.00018357544,0.000040825766,0.9385676,0.046433274,0.0059831208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008706109,0.000119590804,0.00010090489,0.00015518941,0.000030086341,0.00007241746,0.0002694296,0.00020995273,0.000011137397,0.841714,0.15632595,0.000120716264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010902287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016842905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79358447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003233163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000732422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4428331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971960450","doi":"10.1080/09608780801969266","title":"Modernity, The Human Animal and Philosophical Tradition","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dominican University College","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophical methodology","score_opus":0.12834011770641915,"score_gpt":0.2577913704305848,"score_spread":0.12945125272416566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971960450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55903184,0.08190328,0.00028649953,0.14767908,0.014431073,0.0022539967,0.0011828532,0.00023499486,0.1929964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895507,0.0005270132,0.000021681506,0.0013839501,0.0063568465,0.000023537184,0.000011249077,0.000032317166,0.0020927037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984969,0.00013607784,0.0004844077,0.0002033151,0.00039967036,0.00027964506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989435,0.0003202203,0.00020991516,0.00018009084,0.00017803328,0.00016823674],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003938457,0.0001851403,0.000293529,0.00005669555,0.0022117821,0.00006927942,0.0004078275,0.00007013971,0.00046191397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000071819166,0.00013043669,0.00035244474,0.000022922128,0.0025524988,0.00023901436,0.000051430055,0.000620026,0.000007816541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010013076,0.00030359763,0.000009195078,0.00004605118,0.000098872,0.000046281835,0.00251736,0.0000019965507,0.00007844548,0.97344846,0.022609536,0.0007400678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007951052,0.0002986489,0.00030245978,0.00007709184,0.000097013755,0.0017562173,0.00006948363,0.000074310796,0.000006084279,0.71257454,0.28378192,0.00016710606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000073330564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001241647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43051887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120987585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058867176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979382472","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2011.533025","title":"Boyle: Between God and Science","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Philosophy; Haven; Theology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.1423156055555705,"score_gpt":0.23901434666155913,"score_spread":0.09669874110598864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979382472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040138222,0.049672645,0.00077127456,0.0025163153,0.022582108,0.0007784559,0.00019424719,0.00010105025,0.8832457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99280715,0.000114221795,0.00023559417,0.00020820515,0.0012471634,0.000005725925,4.103505e-7,0.000011819148,0.005369691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989213,0.000026802947,0.00029942536,0.00018448321,0.00034149224,0.00022649288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991361,0.00009897828,0.00020368992,0.00014264835,0.00026041656,0.0001581694],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008972165,0.00009555888,0.00018618663,0.00011254632,0.0015039154,0.00006632712,0.00059845304,0.000025777557,0.00035190527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013110893,0.00008092104,0.00011589052,0.000051508177,0.0036547717,0.00052121206,0.00005015194,0.00023343005,0.000007370601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006789026,0.00020217051,0.00007918166,0.00006981428,0.000053741205,0.000026881704,0.045910154,4.771649e-7,0.00021012448,0.87602097,0.04408583,0.033272788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036295378,0.00026122725,0.00049382186,0.00007310197,0.00005637406,0.00016504558,0.00019985484,0.00001093628,0.000021128231,0.33167335,0.6665125,0.00016969697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001509558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019571851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95266896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002103045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015741629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986418568","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2010.502359","title":"Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Monad (category theory); Philosophy; Epistemology; Pure mathematics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.050401322834986044,"score_gpt":0.22289333520599555,"score_spread":0.1724920123710095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986418568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04066214,0.035450675,0.0005267097,0.00692752,0.09906598,0.0008427389,0.00026988488,0.0001479694,0.8161064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9553316,0.00015973762,0.00017694612,0.00053902797,0.0052345167,0.000017340099,0.0000024670974,0.000028024193,0.03851031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987163,0.00003377459,0.0004092569,0.00018815095,0.00039049503,0.00026205461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988181,0.0001807454,0.000283023,0.00022972983,0.00033873986,0.00014967778],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005957339,0.0001353737,0.00023658991,0.000086967404,0.0011862343,0.00008009061,0.00071069325,0.000057098216,0.0009519231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011661546,0.000117983756,0.00032016702,0.000039112874,0.0013673191,0.00037528574,0.000019268155,0.0006589541,0.000028879707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054531603,0.00018103377,0.0000051350253,0.000028483113,0.00003332422,0.000027446113,0.004947205,0.0000029296734,0.0011447201,0.7971027,0.19122548,0.0052469997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033201047,0.000084997744,0.000028551292,0.000032552092,0.000028373666,0.00019879326,0.00004791392,0.000029896826,0.000011740173,0.2029816,0.79608643,0.00013715685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013077192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004715243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9146695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016971417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012444072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996729878","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2014.900605","title":"Leibniz on Infinite Numbers, Infinite Wholes, and Composite Substances","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Infinity; Pure mathematics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04977420463295627,"score_gpt":0.2241849010707028,"score_spread":0.17441069643774654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996729878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06802386,0.073499426,0.0007558096,0.008445255,0.026229784,0.00089204183,0.0003275542,0.00016091717,0.82166535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98744625,0.00043786108,0.00012234454,0.00161317,0.0023561607,0.000009759743,0.000004247151,0.000025121213,0.007985075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986708,0.00009997002,0.00041553026,0.0002143144,0.00036672768,0.00023261449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871314,0.00044643757,0.00031996006,0.00017774927,0.00019722439,0.00014548167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006610733,0.00016333495,0.00029740346,0.000108998815,0.0011784515,0.00012626448,0.00040369577,0.000048061334,0.00014246654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011298036,0.00014183146,0.0001854779,0.00004062291,0.0012655028,0.00032074476,0.000027789709,0.00038192412,0.000017620665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022773769,0.00023954824,0.00004450711,0.0001089502,0.000074597345,0.00001827647,0.012512163,0.00005037155,0.00014463003,0.86382276,0.09553961,0.027216827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058891124,0.0002893712,0.000096449614,0.00018791806,0.000036187786,0.000100659934,0.00007288689,0.00006974979,0.000003973359,0.1488463,0.84952873,0.00017886091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000112211565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014120167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9194224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016818628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045816272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9063815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000887925","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.666849","title":"Lucretius: His Continuing Influence and Contemporary Relevance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.054385425522036276,"score_gpt":0.23472526856301126,"score_spread":0.180339843040975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000887925","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16297995,0.6048702,0.00018582545,0.007584673,0.017789861,0.0009783234,0.0002926604,0.00012560582,0.20519291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884766,0.0006367503,0.00007130102,0.0006012559,0.003452528,0.0000144336245,0.000002448783,0.000026810803,0.006717891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989595,0.000062631014,0.00040377514,0.00012673723,0.00020783431,0.00023952058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880505,0.00039702983,0.00033336712,0.0001329542,0.00018837978,0.00014323379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005170441,0.00013599671,0.00026728472,0.000052805204,0.00046713516,0.00006728115,0.00022712964,0.000045187942,0.00011648958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023248013,0.00012096402,0.00018302682,0.000017950553,0.0010229344,0.0007208845,0.00004036886,0.00034170388,0.0000069189273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029835023,0.00031899774,0.00014014218,0.00023756752,0.00018139115,0.00003469354,0.023367949,0.0000033755846,0.000371836,0.80485934,0.14234278,0.027843568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006351392,0.000088388006,0.00016938882,0.00032996715,0.00004728928,0.0002512153,0.0001817047,0.000009750232,0.000011211027,0.096932776,0.9011839,0.00015928634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055642002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013775762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8254966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011239622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038543865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49327695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003469035","doi":"10.1080/09608780903135253","title":"The Invention of Altruism: Making Moral Meanings in Victorian Britain","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dominican University College; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04005347515820541,"score_gpt":0.29598224036586585,"score_spread":0.25592876520766045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003469035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12830469,0.022492154,0.0008871703,0.021651737,0.044392135,0.0013146705,0.00015239543,0.000053004565,0.78075206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99661523,0.0001715766,0.0002728502,0.00014342205,0.0011443039,0.0000054846805,8.3185233e-7,0.0000069711705,0.0016393388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989923,0.000120274875,0.0003167372,0.00007027398,0.00031047763,0.00018990597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989915,0.00033571373,0.00032904468,0.00008121933,0.00020688665,0.000055669014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015030672,0.000054034695,0.00012828082,0.000043876065,0.00075720757,0.000027341614,0.0003607847,0.000053482534,0.000041976244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055028277,0.00004867522,0.00015059231,0.000079114616,0.0017728914,0.00012894656,0.00001788432,0.00033648396,7.703311e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021016944,0.000035138186,0.000225908,0.000008747727,0.000014206214,0.000005225903,0.0010990364,0.0000044017925,0.000120979596,0.99181795,0.004309579,0.002337822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021930702,0.000026186124,0.00047776272,0.000081883394,0.00001648258,0.00006148575,0.00031308955,0.000010189475,0.000003221009,0.20607723,0.79265577,0.000057403366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015901943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029802006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8683105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023722577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65322924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007126587","doi":"10.1080/09608781003643618","title":"The Ontological Argument from Descartes to Hegel","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Ontological argument; Epistemology; Humanity; Theology; Philosophy of religion","score_opus":0.0536098042117221,"score_gpt":0.2376220770187749,"score_spread":0.18401227280705282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007126587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26507673,0.06640543,0.00048744775,0.12642287,0.12018066,0.0027031593,0.0011974853,0.00024974512,0.41727647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98277766,0.00012523044,0.00021571813,0.0013340908,0.007865576,0.00004366968,0.000004563881,0.000024412837,0.007609066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883324,0.000057551388,0.00039461465,0.0001721759,0.00029503883,0.00024737802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985045,0.00071274734,0.000192867,0.00023949168,0.0001955097,0.00015488875],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044079617,0.0001393718,0.00022571294,0.000031845513,0.0014427904,0.00017491954,0.00062494393,0.000056978883,0.0006599979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002214722,0.000090424444,0.00035065348,0.00001784585,0.00085504126,0.00012492704,0.00005622854,0.0005983243,0.000036924856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019248533,0.00024569232,0.0000056140293,0.000008110278,0.00012887547,0.00002439539,0.0027566433,0.0000026168173,0.0004615701,0.8172802,0.1417583,0.03713553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002682673,0.00010300199,0.000078361394,0.000029944422,0.000037114194,0.000048562695,0.00007995912,0.000010079104,0.000016981312,0.40181306,0.59742963,0.000085013016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016302954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015927069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71770096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106948035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059302445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009023040","doi":"10.1080/09608780802548473","title":"The Real Significance of Bayle's Authorship of theAvis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04814873432005233,"score_gpt":0.30437151656318573,"score_spread":0.2562227822431334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009023040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022805588,0.041764602,0.0013594816,0.021174377,0.006803681,0.0009500346,0.00031486413,0.00003483101,0.90479255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929223,0.001433572,0.00019304038,0.00017017235,0.00063381344,0.0000030261392,6.7656845e-7,0.0000048462416,0.004638554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987876,0.00019668379,0.00036602994,0.00007130675,0.00039107577,0.00018731714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831027,0.00068490114,0.0004755728,0.00011634914,0.00032818777,0.00008470298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013206456,0.000060745806,0.0001816816,0.000026516418,0.00071981264,0.000012050157,0.00047623264,0.000048454007,0.000030912524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003211166,0.000048324167,0.00022238435,0.00007790389,0.0026520323,0.00008023499,0.000008410085,0.00017991103,5.336207e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005924632,0.000064284664,0.00002764869,0.000009644479,0.000024995026,0.0000027626731,0.00095263304,0.000010269483,0.00016681619,0.97623664,0.0122544225,0.010190643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022997917,0.00018081698,0.0010102349,0.00010655524,0.000053477117,0.000031748852,0.00039690823,0.0000041968033,0.000036119047,0.22634143,0.7715245,0.00008404972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013387025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012062578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97011673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020100034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012545597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97715235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016777474","doi":"10.1080/0960878032000058473","title":"The World as Representation: Schopenhauer's Arguments for Transcendental Idealism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Transcendental idealism; Philosophy; Transcendental number; Representation (politics); Epistemology; Politics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05727256063038989,"score_gpt":0.2804476096165112,"score_spread":0.22317504898612134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016777474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0087000355,0.2037145,0.0005918645,0.009365962,0.05017307,0.0041263574,0.0005043231,0.00010261233,0.7227213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45342207,0.0036329904,0.00041885817,0.0019667053,0.0053667533,0.0003395957,0.000030040768,0.00012327578,0.5346997],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983748,0.000114367365,0.00058033835,0.00021294277,0.00039461858,0.00032293398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985488,0.0004042299,0.0003609546,0.00023651053,0.0003289852,0.000120504745],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093737995,0.00017091414,0.00026028152,0.000082590464,0.0024452019,0.00034176797,0.000521811,0.00003980795,0.0016314732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014337563,0.00013495835,0.00052957295,0.00003694059,0.0005382519,0.0003513567,0.000014473331,0.00033153017,0.000035803798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002215132,0.000113439804,0.0000042950114,0.000037643662,0.00019585637,0.000010990346,0.0035670735,0.0000044002168,0.00007616088,0.3698691,0.62128896,0.0046105506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017773084,0.00013083722,0.0000133301255,0.000104335246,0.00011712854,0.00023427821,0.0012557493,0.0000062115896,0.00008420929,0.10373956,0.8923746,0.0001624861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014031916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011395491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44472203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022155026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017230061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028483080","doi":"10.1080/09608780210143254","title":"Religion and the reflective self: Coleridge’s platonism revisited","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Travel Writing and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Dominican University College","funders":"","keywords":"Platonism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.030957831949499314,"score_gpt":0.21419336047973958,"score_spread":0.18323552853024028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028483080","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010623795,0.53503025,0.00006321107,0.014172306,0.008196377,0.0012794872,0.00031379212,0.00016921095,0.4301516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91334856,0.0066676405,0.00017516573,0.0028856194,0.0044775642,0.000034185636,0.00000641418,0.00004864388,0.0723562],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991782,0.00009822542,0.0002849527,0.00012375237,0.00017096072,0.0001439313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916345,0.0002354666,0.00023187202,0.00011955023,0.00020218671,0.000047470203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044997325,0.00010821968,0.00021286709,0.00004777109,0.0010237996,0.00016543845,0.00018826581,0.000045119083,0.00014000629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063429216,0.000075085256,0.00018237556,0.000021260357,0.00061162974,0.00013572886,0.000016683847,0.00040259305,0.0000038369126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016546978,0.00008110118,0.000001278142,0.00007518911,0.000136307,0.000022912182,0.03219826,0.0000013981929,0.000015451444,0.44097206,0.5216215,0.0047090566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016473696,0.000097981756,0.000016466902,0.00029347785,0.00009710069,0.0008120284,0.00019813191,0.00013120008,0.0000017210535,0.034663238,0.96193546,0.000105837025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004929149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018048739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90272474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098167126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017387789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7874343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032427725","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2013.771609","title":"Embodying Justice in Ancient Egypt:<i>The Tale of the Eloquent Peasant</i>as a Classic of Political Philosophy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Peasant; Ideal (ethics); State (computer science); Literature; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03853613673637077,"score_gpt":0.2756476520904255,"score_spread":0.23711151535405475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032427725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31058258,0.12970695,0.00012226797,0.048957013,0.02902877,0.0034675668,0.00013176446,0.000039266157,0.4779638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99483407,0.0005589841,0.000043104792,0.0008803637,0.0010754738,0.000043416574,4.1829108e-7,0.000018973074,0.0025451812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976511,0.00030973981,0.00068125146,0.00017254203,0.00073663524,0.00044872542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817085,0.00047137873,0.0005952667,0.0002614547,0.0004045911,0.00009643528],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013106356,0.00013372637,0.00034993433,0.00009014501,0.0010127706,0.000016762477,0.00088781264,0.00008425847,0.00016062397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056547014,0.00009686338,0.0004189182,0.0002086677,0.0027678555,0.0001349177,0.00010671131,0.00045940993,0.0000060731195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008028146,0.0005032215,0.00024487573,0.00026545854,0.00012582276,0.000014859696,0.02869146,0.00003099183,0.0005981169,0.8767436,0.087711506,0.0049897926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002787477,0.0004557473,0.017106583,0.0019099007,0.0006329683,0.00028692876,0.02269555,0.00009920721,0.00005402395,0.38408628,0.56932175,0.00056354405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056401556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048987294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6842515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095638784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059894606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059453367","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.664025","title":"Scepticism and the Development of the Transcendental Dialectic","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Dialectic; Epistemology; Transcendental number; Transcendental idealism; Critical philosophy; Reflexive pronoun","score_opus":0.06562803257129741,"score_gpt":0.23684473839375003,"score_spread":0.17121670582245263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059453367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35830775,0.26735586,0.0007876459,0.03457384,0.050009795,0.0031020255,0.00024740407,0.00006435512,0.2855513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970545,0.00015271989,0.00003492067,0.00044091602,0.0012826303,0.000014078758,5.243969e-7,0.000016143169,0.0010035346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989397,0.0001384958,0.00039050519,0.00007029259,0.0002875625,0.00017343572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990407,0.00040936534,0.00025422417,0.00012197957,0.000113610935,0.00006010205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015007912,0.00009701783,0.00020059523,0.000029622694,0.0009907465,0.0000310789,0.0003479823,0.00003926543,0.00016710444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105597865,0.00005387044,0.0002520398,0.000016574226,0.0023462733,0.000121773,0.00004067636,0.0004021198,0.0000016735976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014813009,0.00014565735,0.0000066423895,0.000073296535,0.0001332059,5.3204013e-7,0.049719565,8.0870086e-7,0.000100192905,0.9435339,0.000692352,0.0054456983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016995366,0.000041322022,0.00025233536,0.00020565462,0.0001601215,0.00018781173,0.0006343927,0.000011022821,0.000050688577,0.8375746,0.15906064,0.000121888006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026853544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007941611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6387468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008592556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010749657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8644942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065711826","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.679779","title":"Hume and Ancient Philosophy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Literature; Ancient philosophy; Classics; History; Art","score_opus":0.0851335377081105,"score_gpt":0.24956637360070438,"score_spread":0.1644328358925939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065711826","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053925157,0.44860184,0.0002863298,0.025877014,0.056648348,0.0016410163,0.0009263188,0.00017812042,0.41191587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97957027,0.0007292765,0.00009537027,0.0024485255,0.011310605,0.000022752272,0.000007857435,0.000039078594,0.005776273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849355,0.0000817843,0.00046198466,0.0001629387,0.00033928815,0.00046044117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885255,0.00025024728,0.00022300349,0.00016858507,0.00017546583,0.0003301448],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005845007,0.00018433432,0.0003052562,0.00007805489,0.0007034586,0.000067843386,0.00029147012,0.000060218197,0.0009176871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010531219,0.00015132307,0.00032078262,0.000025025138,0.0010951596,0.00038300038,0.00006161109,0.0003759705,0.00002422218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078221834,0.00039762084,0.000029042763,0.000109339744,0.00010350873,0.000005874412,0.002852091,6.146783e-7,0.000037093538,0.9400042,0.05201632,0.0043660332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005571392,0.00012028593,0.00013128482,0.00011622509,0.0000863033,0.0002618224,0.00006956985,0.000007385438,0.0000068866566,0.25934926,0.7391319,0.00016190977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003506278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004688103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9256451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016198821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040506136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067132141","doi":"10.1080/09608780902763675","title":"‘Historical Dictionary of Nietzscheanism’, ‘On the Genealogy of Morality’ and ‘Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and None’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Zoroaster; Philosophy; History; Classics; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06658631615997454,"score_gpt":0.24746486811588847,"score_spread":0.18087855195591393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067132141","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22428885,0.6842395,0.00054073636,0.03017525,0.009988145,0.0034538428,0.0010632632,0.00006444318,0.046185933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978706,0.005772551,0.0002967507,0.0015901385,0.0018735658,0.000030023544,0.000006927485,0.00003299854,0.011691067],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885476,0.00005996105,0.0005286917,0.00016429093,0.00021688615,0.00017541558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884945,0.0002794023,0.0004063466,0.00015142602,0.00023269032,0.000080690545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005586295,0.00014257414,0.00039065548,0.00007836785,0.0004343002,0.000026518512,0.00021324768,0.000069224065,0.00010444043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052851956,0.00011091696,0.00024461828,0.000015406278,0.0005643197,0.00016031752,0.000018967401,0.00025487735,5.005342e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011969078,0.0007400661,0.000026818469,0.0002996605,0.00029520996,0.000017767354,0.012490754,0.0000070201568,0.0019054348,0.33115932,0.6419468,0.009914221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014289842,0.0015505103,0.0006100079,0.00015953294,0.0002055157,0.00029252534,0.0003320299,0.0000405418,0.000060090933,0.050866745,0.9442861,0.00016743869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010236758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038732047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7544171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014006149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076162425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45230624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069475098","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2010.524770","title":"The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Medieval Philosophy and Theology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Regent College","funders":"","keywords":"Medieval philosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology; History of philosophy; Classics; History","score_opus":0.04619760930760119,"score_gpt":0.22829497090150214,"score_spread":0.18209736159390094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069475098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01156014,0.11305312,0.000064525986,0.009978535,0.12473577,0.0010202099,0.00030423517,0.00008058157,0.73920286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456943,0.0011616983,0.000065459215,0.00088402664,0.013087295,0.000045863075,0.000010763251,0.0000788568,0.03897169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771196,0.00016896754,0.00091581035,0.0002454834,0.0005623509,0.00039546101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968479,0.00093241094,0.00093490793,0.00048951106,0.00062502944,0.00017023917],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016975628,0.00025470738,0.0005006051,0.0001312494,0.00085083843,0.000033315377,0.0011497872,0.00012696971,0.0009056487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003988645,0.0001886759,0.0006506282,0.000027265749,0.004809782,0.00024165993,0.00008270999,0.001100025,0.000020376889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003225905,0.00018834071,0.0000026650741,0.00010455891,0.00020803376,0.000023546294,0.0037101542,0.0000012686305,0.00058663666,0.7920859,0.19747755,0.005288767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008240713,0.00024832244,0.000016673226,0.000086852364,0.00012955214,0.00037207094,0.00010621005,0.000022853035,0.00001864937,0.26653647,0.73147213,0.00016613772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017207433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002579426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9341342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003451519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048051623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079914764","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.689750","title":"The Limits of Experience and Explanation: F. A. Lange and Ernst Mach on Things in Themselves","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Relation (database); Philosophy; Denial; Vision; Mach number; Inference; Philosophy of science; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Theology; Computer science; Mechanics; Physics","score_opus":0.08236861792178442,"score_gpt":0.2544564984952087,"score_spread":0.17208788057342428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079914764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49594322,0.27535346,0.0000140349985,0.0038791755,0.0101662055,0.00063548033,0.00009356534,0.000030387902,0.21388447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954166,0.0015267107,0.000020631604,0.0002959081,0.00077446474,0.000013422108,6.920261e-7,0.000009276666,0.0019423169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925184,0.000041647738,0.00024156613,0.00009254985,0.00021809508,0.00015428275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993505,0.00022155802,0.00019960139,0.000095441625,0.00007339423,0.000059520713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005695557,0.0000816971,0.00014216789,0.000077091165,0.0006195782,0.000042633426,0.0002230465,0.000021293485,0.000032191336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006296272,0.00005890068,0.000056901372,0.000018652912,0.0011351536,0.00042369755,0.000019164238,0.00016218625,9.250874e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018467862,0.00027928568,0.0004086324,0.000107155785,0.00004280318,0.000008436301,0.23278789,0.0000018196918,0.00028290597,0.7154657,0.021139579,0.029291103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069937896,0.00018898105,0.0018198219,0.0002539061,0.000027725015,0.00018803727,0.003975873,0.000032957916,0.000027792941,0.03849596,0.9541096,0.00017992893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012018586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010610966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93297005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008024703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029419833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4765357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081716706","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2011.650975","title":"Malebranche, the Quietists, and Freedom","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Context (archaeology); Period (music); Epistemology; History; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.041311710720692,"score_gpt":0.2629524950018639,"score_spread":0.2216407842811719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081716706","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01689073,0.8034929,0.0003788202,0.015771497,0.022126675,0.00059864396,0.000060520255,0.000041933545,0.14063829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434007,0.006210252,0.00032474406,0.0007784465,0.0067493436,0.000024311981,8.502491e-7,0.000017050183,0.042494323],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990938,0.00014110614,0.00019655249,0.000071917704,0.0002605113,0.0002361226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992383,0.0003329518,0.00013968386,0.000079665064,0.00009389303,0.00011546494],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011234073,0.000068689595,0.00014235971,0.000022238342,0.0015970242,0.0000241828,0.0002738671,0.000041836127,0.00011140607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002209598,0.000048224207,0.0001396256,0.000058516707,0.0010788933,0.00024317733,0.000030160289,0.00020357284,0.000004290147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057485893,0.00017891341,0.0012292437,0.000043857395,0.00012548715,0.0000075649873,0.06527154,0.0000011117428,0.000031071,0.14301464,0.74772274,0.042316325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020389947,0.000029037965,0.001727636,0.00003338071,0.000038651542,0.00008638485,0.0004343029,0.0000013662983,3.1222774e-7,0.010284495,0.9870907,0.00006984753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005458646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010480146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022019651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006214773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091317637","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2011.583413","title":"The Unity of Efficient and Final Causality: The Mind/Body Problem Reconsidered","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Causality (physics); Mind–body problem; Epistemology; Physics","score_opus":0.1518580751963127,"score_gpt":0.24092429234221252,"score_spread":0.08906621714589982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091317637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2666633,0.1183929,0.00017746897,0.030986916,0.019583091,0.0034549306,0.00090222596,0.00007757005,0.5597616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99392605,0.00026852565,0.000050388004,0.000191178,0.00095619843,0.000018276824,0.0000014875321,0.000018794894,0.0045690783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987525,0.0001722604,0.0005029937,0.00013305865,0.00024264034,0.00019659592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834657,0.0006147914,0.00045687932,0.00022858067,0.00028395766,0.0000692273],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010655776,0.00012909157,0.0002335665,0.00003721296,0.0014036639,0.000058389644,0.00038181525,0.0000410676,0.00020327207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013772817,0.00007543986,0.0002363982,0.000026524564,0.0023314285,0.00008413703,0.000059336562,0.0003907378,0.0000025083702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044783406,0.00047795774,0.000010812678,0.00011656396,0.00030690554,0.000022174048,0.0197541,0.00000647106,0.00005551681,0.92504287,0.031350892,0.022407886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006552772,0.00025404282,0.0002031519,0.00016257621,0.00016147493,0.0002994748,0.00060847966,0.000057848803,0.00003160864,0.5556368,0.4418046,0.00012464054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023018976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036756034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72726274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007420299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011794075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155781237","doi":"10.1080/09608780902763634","title":"‘Hume’ and ‘The Blackwell Guide to Hume's Treatise’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Hume's philosophy and hair distribution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.028218195834317936,"score_gpt":0.2970518607699641,"score_spread":0.26883366493564614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155781237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020707708,0.14082423,0.0067894068,0.2342834,0.01245571,0.0044067022,0.00041402204,0.00021946883,0.5798994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98328257,0.0023225439,0.00033984857,0.0022549538,0.0024669634,0.000021223113,0.0000050455938,0.000015923299,0.009290915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841213,0.00025054987,0.00042179695,0.00018408192,0.00043442097,0.00029701556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884343,0.00027741183,0.0002519962,0.00017239418,0.000246467,0.00020827656],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001878889,0.00012785016,0.00027621473,0.00006537409,0.00168108,0.000099960234,0.00050091784,0.000087088854,0.00013000681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048448666,0.00010613001,0.00026724863,0.00012492771,0.0010439,0.00022530483,0.00002387944,0.00026451578,0.0000127638095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004179604,0.0001919882,0.000012885761,0.000018809242,0.00008412866,0.0000328565,0.00855634,0.000024372406,0.000103009545,0.58194005,0.30833197,0.10028562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001396842,0.0001523555,0.00029383108,0.00008790703,0.000085719636,0.000094512594,0.00022581831,0.000010315374,0.0000075073676,0.3235105,0.6740062,0.00012844898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048320802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002129953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9625749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048720962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021986579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158220885","doi":"10.1080/09608780802548440","title":"Malebranche's Method: Knowledge and Evidence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Cartesianism; Psychologism; Epistemology; CLARITY; Doctrine; Platonism; Direct and indirect realism; Theology; Perception; Chemistry","score_opus":0.11285033369103256,"score_gpt":0.2921261545991854,"score_spread":0.17927582090815283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158220885","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002450403,0.7293336,0.0047768867,0.013627919,0.01669399,0.00074297184,0.000048453057,0.00009149176,0.23223428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96762896,0.0014071092,0.0013141553,0.0012147571,0.0034808635,0.00000972585,5.74998e-7,0.00001684891,0.024926998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998974,0.00009428441,0.00033682593,0.00018744342,0.00021620688,0.00019123255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988796,0.00041383543,0.00020720508,0.00014200645,0.00023356364,0.00012375161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010003841,0.00011684737,0.00023643917,0.00007818116,0.000858517,0.00007185077,0.0004002861,0.00003764485,0.00021923622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023663255,0.000099744815,0.0001926712,0.000035297155,0.0006108683,0.00045400645,0.000020122827,0.00028431704,0.000008137937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013463752,0.00026912068,0.000002798351,0.00012282326,0.00004104773,0.000027267435,0.021497868,0.0000078473095,0.00048156167,0.6285429,0.18656892,0.16230321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028862382,0.00028311,0.000065170236,0.000281637,0.000047943326,0.000324223,0.00005557958,0.00009518231,0.000005952173,0.271164,0.7272506,0.00013798183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033940316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024628735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96517855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020367333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009502104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66031057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332652228","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2014.946470","title":"The Philosophy of Praxis: Marx, Lukács, and the Frankfurt School","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.026405762701099664,"score_gpt":0.2739537506377253,"score_spread":0.24754798793662564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332652228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006988248,0.24521907,0.001968707,0.16862203,0.01670713,0.003152367,0.00016493825,0.00010787741,0.55706966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888091,0.003999478,0.00011502096,0.0012332024,0.003710382,0.000041372878,0.0000012028836,0.00003045178,0.002059809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688214,0.0011746298,0.00067444367,0.00021259217,0.00068674755,0.00036946379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99425673,0.0042502573,0.00047587598,0.00036137394,0.00042951657,0.0002262528],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072486103,0.0001754418,0.00041452964,0.00012210276,0.0027663358,0.00011108264,0.001089147,0.00013042166,0.00011764114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036626828,0.00011260142,0.0004726082,0.0003066621,0.006497096,0.00024266286,0.00008611769,0.00065369945,0.0000073815104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052511884,0.00007767199,0.000018551056,0.000054572378,0.000106600295,0.0000029855437,0.0015394799,0.0000037959007,0.000018626242,0.97097003,0.010428999,0.016253538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010728722,0.00008716062,0.00005127822,0.00012518038,0.00008232926,0.00005627089,0.00019733423,0.000019787063,0.0000046315654,0.59250486,0.40570393,0.000094387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020835307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004382686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014305198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018912627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337735366","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2016.1154007","title":"Materialism in the mainstream of early German philosophy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft","keywords":"Materialism; Mainstream; German; Philosophy; German philosophy; Epistemology; Theology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06148565831719774,"score_gpt":0.24108695420927098,"score_spread":0.17960129589207324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337735366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.429568,0.027260676,0.00034115784,0.039250102,0.043278217,0.002374167,0.0012904222,0.00010473006,0.45653254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99382544,0.00018710998,0.000029910168,0.00043877497,0.002296489,0.000022174552,0.000001206323,0.000019656492,0.0031792475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983224,0.00015055707,0.00062667864,0.00018120732,0.00046287695,0.0002562569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987259,0.00030255035,0.0004296638,0.00028049885,0.00019339264,0.00006798538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009519654,0.00014945792,0.00030507304,0.00013497926,0.0004524405,0.00004936838,0.000963676,0.000052467967,0.00037716713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009360919,0.00008697237,0.00030203725,0.000054174714,0.0014759969,0.0003783105,0.000034075743,0.00020565472,0.000013195814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023404951,0.0003855142,0.000015503576,0.00008816549,0.00004829868,0.000052225718,0.021070404,0.0000013228644,0.0011974324,0.92781657,0.03910844,0.009982086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093914097,0.00033584316,0.00017549665,0.00032245214,0.000036521677,0.00015416932,0.000083803956,0.0000018236751,0.000023541976,0.54441077,0.453354,0.00016241414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002124421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005951636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56425744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023859223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009148031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5438372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467690823","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2016.1177483","title":"Ross’s place in the history of analytic philosophy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Philosophy; Analytic philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Contemporary philosophy","score_opus":0.054768886353215834,"score_gpt":0.2834945838184412,"score_spread":0.2287256974652254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467690823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027394801,0.1619695,0.0018713247,0.031100858,0.033266846,0.0016817261,0.0003050185,0.000071931914,0.742338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99122787,0.0003038793,0.000059741727,0.0009820835,0.0009497253,0.000040862855,0.0000011105636,0.000029722818,0.006405002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736446,0.00044436374,0.0008114967,0.00034980307,0.00058788975,0.00044199056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971776,0.001311837,0.00061588053,0.0005784347,0.00017865139,0.00013760103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025096003,0.0002123975,0.0004469203,0.00019221027,0.00016197069,0.000011224347,0.001576709,0.00014018579,0.0008443434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041869798,0.00013353952,0.00048137692,0.00019646446,0.0024833786,0.0002285952,0.000058771308,0.0004743622,0.000035043966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008413824,0.0009141367,0.00006600067,0.000059432357,0.00017760051,0.00017788862,0.0036021532,0.000009737075,0.0010085196,0.851218,0.12220846,0.019716717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023614734,0.0004683379,0.0012775329,0.00041452333,0.000115541705,0.00093574956,0.00006578228,0.00001747147,0.000011592196,0.77468765,0.2193927,0.00025163314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000098426426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001879602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9638331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010633689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027035092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92449677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584133136","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2016.1266461","title":"Donald C. Williams’s defence of real metaphysics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; University of Manchester; Arts and Humanities Research Council; British Academy; Princeton University","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Key (lock); History; Computer science","score_opus":0.06861166619446298,"score_gpt":0.3166726351151308,"score_spread":0.2480609689206678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584133136","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057704683,0.021347597,0.0028926732,0.005349347,0.020462295,0.0006545449,0.00028918192,0.000037441332,0.89126223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962634,0.00035338983,0.00030835,0.00016692,0.00072777306,0.000013125746,0.0000010014702,0.00001714755,0.0021488888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863774,0.00009479388,0.0004287524,0.00021456598,0.0003610816,0.0002630678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979652,0.00029311512,0.00081220944,0.0005796454,0.00021872517,0.00013106214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009823317,0.00012349461,0.00032184372,0.00004315768,0.0006658856,0.000031892534,0.0014946522,0.00007868973,0.00024908694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002469705,0.00010795847,0.0004086354,0.00004283585,0.002325252,0.0002475842,0.000080270736,0.0003183852,0.0000126228215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022018107,0.0002902223,0.000070210655,0.000031156043,0.00015117433,0.000042598174,0.0004897651,0.0000044631233,0.00091683766,0.9682436,0.010443379,0.019096399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085039967,0.00024286803,0.0042953724,0.00014837654,0.00012206455,0.00038665562,0.00002665103,0.000018083672,0.000112632144,0.96633565,0.027305847,0.00015542262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025624948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012029651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9385587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009689841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000852896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85674876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618733512","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2017.1322038","title":"Consciousness, ideas of ideas and animation in Spinoza’s<i>Ethics</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Consciousness; Epistemology; Philosophy; Meaning (existential); Illusion; Object (grammar); Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09110031731990202,"score_gpt":0.2892774388847627,"score_spread":0.19817712156486067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618733512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39422572,0.20793432,0.00024341585,0.076547034,0.031475145,0.002599933,0.0014470782,0.00009259416,0.28543475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99570066,0.00096764014,0.000051520616,0.0004775551,0.0011682744,0.000008446068,0.000003431743,0.000017510018,0.0016049381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879587,0.00008813126,0.00051182974,0.00014163888,0.00027185318,0.0001906742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864393,0.00031171087,0.0004955044,0.00021046969,0.00024615822,0.00009223411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076942524,0.00011905994,0.00031906003,0.000067827095,0.0007528618,0.00009455125,0.00038315175,0.000073449046,0.00017633798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052223913,0.00010550419,0.00018149108,0.000009895384,0.0017290743,0.0003144284,0.000059706057,0.0004503064,0.0000025929803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011763766,0.00017298933,0.00010534814,0.00023859765,0.000049255967,0.000018210512,0.002449271,0.0000013934717,0.0000618819,0.9898426,0.0045972588,0.0023455534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010365082,0.00012058374,0.0010239719,0.0004891008,0.000053286632,0.00011302912,0.00009188273,0.00003194041,0.000013520493,0.7544658,0.24243858,0.000121796824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005224051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026856226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60147494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087540815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090646194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63708466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908726607","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2018.1537256","title":"Patriarchal power as unjust: tyranny in seventeenth-century Venice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Power (physics); Politics; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Philosophy; Political philosophy; Moral philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.052257008643323284,"score_gpt":0.25521112989357064,"score_spread":0.20295412125024737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908726607","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18457901,0.58577186,0.000020080139,0.009086378,0.07149499,0.0019187238,0.00019361303,0.00008161331,0.14685373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93420976,0.012759999,0.000021888374,0.0008304918,0.0034808945,0.000029556642,0.000006478716,0.00004523469,0.04861572],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998565,0.00009689293,0.00044897705,0.00023985155,0.00034981608,0.00029943432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991171,0.00011455251,0.0002644095,0.00018057879,0.0002280143,0.00009535011],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072330865,0.00013869816,0.00032007333,0.000080817124,0.0005774781,0.000027549366,0.00027407953,0.000059846727,0.0010573753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075792486,0.000129308,0.00033655134,0.000041316387,0.00033039617,0.00015416442,0.000032991018,0.00043391102,0.000053233834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011589323,0.0019070451,0.0002474391,0.0010431522,0.000616504,0.00011084799,0.41966957,0.00004177297,0.0000719789,0.1409399,0.4009715,0.033221353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009636681,0.0002991642,0.00012998442,0.000103413884,0.000032150274,0.00011007861,0.0058268933,0.00000340428,5.8180393e-7,0.008429369,0.98394996,0.00015132924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065247616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028784844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74963075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090421503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014825565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954972732","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2019.1629387","title":"Kant and the science of logic","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Virtue","score_opus":0.04823795495855564,"score_gpt":0.22843106585346404,"score_spread":0.18019311089490841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954972732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12077806,0.107659556,0.00008245325,0.021730848,0.022539774,0.0016897753,0.00018209752,0.00004081472,0.7252966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925455,0.0002586556,0.000026958038,0.0003347995,0.0008460017,0.000004753766,3.9040893e-7,0.000008997637,0.0059739733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913955,0.000041756717,0.00028939967,0.000113686794,0.00028014422,0.00013547407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989938,0.0003101699,0.00027446778,0.00015254137,0.00022340199,0.00004561022],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009130597,0.00007653372,0.00022519809,0.000056239664,0.0005162696,0.00005252041,0.00040682362,0.000019094214,0.0002595408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105952626,0.000046670782,0.00018461436,0.000030147432,0.0044741924,0.00019185276,0.000054332275,0.0002060967,0.0000053133735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014315936,0.000057194542,0.0000011083531,0.000046505585,0.000030216615,0.0000022394242,0.0026600633,0.0000043066584,0.00019831287,0.99048835,0.004060733,0.0023078278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014165851,0.0001435789,0.000025584213,0.0001239597,0.00005408946,0.00015126693,0.00020040001,0.000092584094,0.00002807109,0.7882172,0.20946842,0.0000782716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048598587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010856553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8717674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006370882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008878411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99823505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001579879","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2019.1664980","title":"Kant’s lectures on metaphysics: a critical guide","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Relation (database); Computer science","score_opus":0.1114586155937869,"score_gpt":0.2807317843998352,"score_spread":0.1692731688060483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001579879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018842951,0.07275093,0.0022489124,0.24788566,0.021549072,0.0009569534,0.0008116953,0.00021339467,0.65169907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97462153,0.00023894131,0.00008144522,0.016369838,0.007373002,0.000015894062,0.0000039257234,0.000046307443,0.0012491319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861956,0.00011350017,0.00043422522,0.00020360398,0.00039677694,0.0002323588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983304,0.0008297087,0.00017251002,0.00015048527,0.00032841755,0.00018845365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047223145,0.00016473811,0.00032817986,0.00004894129,0.0006835427,0.000102272475,0.00048258112,0.00006205013,0.0008047226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008693278,0.00013671504,0.0005064657,0.00002344347,0.0012150033,0.00015521138,0.00003952456,0.0007535829,0.000029099449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016195935,0.00013120372,7.847456e-8,0.00007564049,0.000120213765,0.000046372716,0.0038049223,0.00001551388,0.00009689755,0.9311388,0.06118562,0.003222777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030614302,0.00025899144,7.9463183e-7,0.00008248344,0.00006889674,0.000051492858,0.00006146549,0.000052222054,0.000015140244,0.5369906,0.46200994,0.0001018355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035749697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000147130895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103256265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013551675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8811148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135155537","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2021.1881881","title":"Is this me?A story about personal identity from the <i>Mahāprajñāpāramitopadeśa</i> / <i>Dà zhìdù lùn</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Indian and Buddhist Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Buddhism; Philosophy; Sanskrit; Personal identity; Literature; Identity (music); Framing (construction); Epistemology; Aesthetics; History; Self; Theology; Art","score_opus":0.05201970458598405,"score_gpt":0.23580911850253733,"score_spread":0.1837894139165533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135155537","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025461935,0.67135817,0.00012585978,0.032594394,0.052984964,0.0007432155,0.0035808731,0.00011543493,0.21303517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5441634,0.013077345,0.00020962472,0.039599534,0.032821916,0.00009155612,0.00009674208,0.00018991741,0.36974996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980356,0.00019438978,0.00048636383,0.0002947223,0.0006440508,0.00034485382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804443,0.0004946211,0.00042350523,0.0002788963,0.0006648406,0.0000937044],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007031211,0.00023468002,0.00039479762,0.000044452736,0.0030067547,0.00031353647,0.0006699375,0.0000753805,0.0055995868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001690658,0.00018621948,0.0007611268,0.000042026986,0.0014080976,0.0005447435,0.00011460298,0.00079811766,0.00009985942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060473816,0.00016434074,0.000080785096,0.000059480277,0.00042807823,0.000102093065,0.044330817,5.594747e-7,0.000075683165,0.021835582,0.92991745,0.0029446408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008305574,0.00005575379,0.0003101461,0.00024540845,0.00023724817,0.00028003484,0.0019542493,0.000012418587,0.000027513637,0.017172381,0.97862387,0.00025039783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056191295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009525217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6582808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037904238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003163602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229017849","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2022.2060181","title":"On the significance of A. A. Robb’s philosophy of time, especially in relation to Bertrand Russell’s","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Relation (database); Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Theory of relativity; Minkowski space; Theoretical physics; Physics; Mathematical physics; Computer science","score_opus":0.047906312784820645,"score_gpt":0.21856027322571867,"score_spread":0.17065396044089803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229017849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18248054,0.021862026,0.00021741116,0.03527384,0.016839463,0.0043811863,0.0015916107,0.00006350346,0.7372904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99326533,0.000058159185,0.000048448725,0.00064660946,0.0007051712,0.000059549795,0.0000038473036,0.000023502991,0.0051893773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980636,0.00017832393,0.00070175005,0.00021220319,0.00065304176,0.00019107664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983635,0.0004909181,0.0006390419,0.00024703908,0.0001977548,0.00006177636],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001363542,0.0001422191,0.0003481835,0.00026444579,0.000900605,0.000020359937,0.0008228084,0.00002994506,0.0014737225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012957085,0.00012440064,0.0002815482,0.000117881784,0.0009608538,0.00019881083,0.000054295873,0.00044296897,0.0000073699307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009977317,0.0007133523,0.000005168799,0.00009536119,0.00006992416,0.000017341288,0.024068082,0.0035202361,0.0028017273,0.8886724,0.0773685,0.0016701956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011284478,0.0014003692,0.00016718524,0.00032104162,0.000062172796,0.000056937013,0.00037696445,0.00011923804,0.0000854587,0.5861263,0.40988696,0.00026894268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014276296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009545975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8107848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039895636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020679427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233462544","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2002.10383085","title":"Book reviews","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.14443855001809397,"score_gpt":0.32209335206191975,"score_spread":0.17765480204382578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233462544","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022463537,0.6415991,0.00021927063,0.03065613,0.0053032166,0.00038642288,0.000020033593,0.000027352267,0.32176602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17299198,0.3521586,0.0010154545,0.06247164,0.022674939,0.000114790266,0.0000038442854,0.00010647757,0.38846228],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998512,0.00027255414,0.00040863364,0.00011868838,0.00037495515,0.00031314362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988361,0.0004076383,0.00023650491,0.00014595065,0.00016637046,0.0002074624],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017232092,0.00008864403,0.00024127036,0.000043738997,0.0010713763,0.000033971577,0.0005092039,0.00010801923,0.001801188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011690612,0.0000835335,0.00037665345,0.00006903051,0.0011604378,0.00027762502,0.00001937612,0.0004782039,0.000070127884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007714068,0.0000864793,8.126946e-7,0.000033424636,0.000018109306,0.000010803612,0.0022352226,8.1877573e-7,0.000006555071,0.14641334,0.8401322,0.011054524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020485048,0.000038379938,0.000004206105,0.0001241202,0.000033747132,0.000063585474,0.000030223102,0.000009530717,8.297697e-7,0.22218454,0.7772241,0.00008188025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014984347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028939528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28944048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004020324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010137427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288698319","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2022.2098689","title":"The ontology of images in Plato’s<i>Timaeus</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Ontology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Property (philosophy); Receptacle; Simple (philosophy); Linguistics","score_opus":0.04421202312164213,"score_gpt":0.2289103170119781,"score_spread":0.18469829389033596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288698319","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034372963,0.29622546,0.00009324258,0.04968877,0.044464592,0.0018978217,0.0016784361,0.00008134023,0.5714974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988098,0.0003487436,0.000021636535,0.0004843656,0.0011382892,0.00005132314,0.0000042653555,0.000023423874,0.009829914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987191,0.00015582563,0.00051526283,0.0001212784,0.0002858016,0.00020272241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986941,0.00059700484,0.00038541228,0.00016940199,0.00011451153,0.000039551993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007518225,0.000100400175,0.00026444579,0.00007631964,0.0011542107,0.000028542745,0.0005825507,0.000023346573,0.000503797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091773865,0.00007935345,0.000300057,0.00003610713,0.001054488,0.0001134274,0.00009187189,0.00053985085,0.0000017292613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043398017,0.00042096103,0.000012145876,0.00004899304,0.00010021187,0.00006354498,0.0049736863,0.0000747879,0.00012835386,0.79976475,0.1819028,0.012075808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060483604,0.00017256454,0.00002838117,0.000027856318,0.000026934755,0.00020094178,0.000339711,0.000018362733,0.000009194514,0.3356204,0.6628805,0.000070324226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001555558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003610471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9537251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023134933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000106749365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88773715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311237460","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2022.2142197","title":"Cartesian intuition","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Certainty; Philosophy; Perception; Psychology","score_opus":0.06712002824523436,"score_gpt":0.220494746916762,"score_spread":0.15337471867152763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311237460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005766426,0.08516206,0.0019091454,0.017447831,0.10077825,0.0014200959,0.0008742896,0.00018246814,0.78645945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776407,0.000053823336,0.000043136282,0.0008657852,0.002214067,0.00004917806,0.0000054867514,0.000017430173,0.01911042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989283,0.00008732023,0.0002983563,0.00013037003,0.00039134864,0.00016431113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993333,0.000109095265,0.00022675905,0.00012543602,0.00013445767,0.000070943905],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006156732,0.00007925488,0.00015210023,0.00008287775,0.0023855667,0.00004092743,0.00047952743,0.000013915621,0.0024043217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052958923,0.00007727733,0.0002454383,0.00003655333,0.000518714,0.00019963463,0.00004641905,0.0003690715,0.0000071412314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064572625,0.00020985254,9.716867e-7,0.000023672801,0.00003099255,0.000027405396,0.01301781,0.000083383005,0.00007807532,0.5965239,0.37993833,0.010001059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025180556,0.00021055221,0.000003390352,0.000012776314,0.000022713892,0.00025314515,0.00028559586,0.000052027695,9.4683725e-7,0.22799121,0.7708321,0.00008370029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011152581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031102263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97187424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006640051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001140773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99891317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366524411","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2023.2178732","title":"The historical history of philosophy: a discussion with Michael Frede <b>The historiography of philosophy</b> , by Michael Frede, with a postface by Jonathan Barnes, edited by Katerina Ierodiakonou, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022, 256 pp., £55.00, (hb), ISBN: 9780198840725","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Philosophy; Michael reaction; Classics; Theology; History; Chemistry; Organic chemistry","score_opus":0.019124561226420186,"score_gpt":0.18883822464027372,"score_spread":0.16971366341385352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366524411","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027060566,0.7509888,0.000394762,0.054703593,0.043020956,0.0060855704,0.013194673,0.0007260657,0.103825055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69310063,0.039738726,0.00025449938,0.0015489494,0.0073723374,0.00029536668,0.00082317495,0.00072242477,0.2561439],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944309,0.00044565005,0.0013414703,0.00096194627,0.0018374331,0.0009825785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99493545,0.0004176979,0.0021882858,0.001088827,0.00091151794,0.0004582033],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012298861,0.00084589387,0.0012428894,0.00050164177,0.0024998747,0.00007803714,0.0027041284,0.00025413593,0.00012593048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008593442,0.0005566731,0.0009634695,0.0004642552,0.0061357277,0.0009171894,0.0002530841,0.0012927296,0.000004054812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022299,0.0008931134,0.000053120202,0.00035420954,0.0004988188,0.000062607534,0.009036369,0.0000163935,0.0019785345,0.014461681,0.9695828,0.00083243987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027736288,0.0014560514,0.000033876557,0.000511497,0.00046551615,0.00015751661,0.0008337234,0.000060140588,0.000038936447,0.0069517586,0.98592573,0.0007916304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028519402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049998576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038986178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079975306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372287184","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2023.2201615","title":"Varieties of consciousness in classical Arabic thought: Avicenna, Averroes, and the <i>mutakallimūn</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Medieval and Classical Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.044401909531545714,"score_gpt":0.23280495053728342,"score_spread":0.1884030410057377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372287184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19594471,0.2230034,0.00023376038,0.17303048,0.050557278,0.005389159,0.0011883636,0.00037479275,0.35027805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832871,0.0025511496,0.000013060568,0.0007731995,0.0017731801,0.000044690856,0.0000063642588,0.000031690914,0.011519592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983453,0.00018821651,0.0006227623,0.00017879232,0.00040844368,0.0002564819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825966,0.0009333247,0.0003446812,0.0001761129,0.00020263833,0.00008355049],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011686217,0.00016054166,0.00048314498,0.000162048,0.00045353032,0.000057332207,0.00041937004,0.00006548858,0.00016269402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017635158,0.00010563806,0.00029414275,0.00010325831,0.0035753509,0.00016231863,0.00007500487,0.000490734,0.000009185707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006295963,0.0001830422,0.000020222178,0.00024784208,0.000121215635,0.000045592045,0.009795706,0.000013371448,0.000051883464,0.8965956,0.089121,0.003174927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025270078,0.00012858106,0.00015503832,0.00024016305,0.000099679586,0.00011485789,0.00077686954,0.00027611371,0.0000048765546,0.559632,0.4359034,0.0001414356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012805873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028349413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78734237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006637716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000092716364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386602190","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2023.2239022","title":"An inconsistency in Cassirer’s conception of the a priori","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07423693053374412,"score_gpt":0.2586299337892665,"score_spread":0.18439300325552238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386602190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68456763,0.033011172,0.000035914043,0.006366143,0.056012977,0.0019463516,0.0005511542,0.00016970951,0.21733895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939246,0.00018133874,0.000015424548,0.0002071834,0.0012266841,0.000016453405,0.000002651866,0.000016864731,0.0044087814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987491,0.000110546884,0.00046059073,0.0001499379,0.00034121456,0.00018865627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990245,0.00010241258,0.0003758322,0.00023580718,0.00020349721,0.00005794435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078987295,0.00010064887,0.00022784261,0.00017884152,0.0006094748,0.000032627042,0.00060940546,0.000035159672,0.00014829251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000079065474,0.00007919194,0.00024989762,0.000093198476,0.0015190031,0.00032265764,0.000032439195,0.00025723092,0.000006691887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027185233,0.0009747782,0.00046159906,0.00035762312,0.00012686056,0.00009519736,0.17465103,0.00021718086,0.00342025,0.6183209,0.16874485,0.0323579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012760435,0.00029743538,0.0028718088,0.0004519279,0.00007211061,0.00016438629,0.002386482,0.0002805345,0.000016102324,0.22360647,0.7683217,0.00025501277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050851476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017096044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59957683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033747323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028341342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.559683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392927328","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2307336","title":"Reorienting Clifford’s evidentialism: returning to social trust","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11515375989045752,"score_gpt":0.2998163492941909,"score_spread":0.18466258940373337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392927328","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087814614,0.24585123,0.005103279,0.044141866,0.3113542,0.0022523748,0.00094983017,0.00059569953,0.30193692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87869257,0.00035257696,0.00030223245,0.0017779195,0.028199486,0.000038165657,0.000013739072,0.00009854286,0.090524785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986713,0.0001001312,0.00048616866,0.00019572912,0.00029403446,0.00025263906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990609,0.00024537803,0.00020914899,0.000108808716,0.0003001666,0.00007556267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013411819,0.00012972216,0.00027614416,0.00012003122,0.0012539543,0.00026964993,0.00032482416,0.000068780784,0.00029143292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019220125,0.00012492175,0.00048027807,0.000037298323,0.0005546209,0.00030261354,0.00004396453,0.00059904373,0.00002091035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006534829,0.0000600681,0.0000032134815,0.00044978168,0.00024909573,0.000075506156,0.084846914,0.0000044935714,0.0002577609,0.52326876,0.36641994,0.024299104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002074901,0.000083720806,0.000009469804,0.0004661862,0.00016213386,0.00016683925,0.00111653,0.00003081043,0.000009323171,0.13607994,0.8615244,0.00014317871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014474698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012162834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79087794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023846545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014780847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9644529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401615859","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2389869","title":"Du Châtelet's causal idealism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Rationalism; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Natural (archaeology); Chemistry","score_opus":0.05660890936950277,"score_gpt":0.23375143077835076,"score_spread":0.17714252140884798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401615859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00396001,0.2645037,0.0016693714,0.023338402,0.11777941,0.0007413245,0.00041149493,0.0003039422,0.5872924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95604414,0.00049681694,0.00005886557,0.00076437596,0.010166793,0.000018311417,0.0000036129834,0.000034412427,0.03241266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987719,0.000049642793,0.0003908874,0.00019613642,0.0003646979,0.00022675471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918175,0.00025164447,0.00011882688,0.00014065586,0.00019178346,0.0001153376],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065966416,0.0001288763,0.0002118735,0.00011111789,0.0008804405,0.00018767067,0.00047916666,0.00004195422,0.0010778132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010413391,0.000107485226,0.00036195095,0.000045374127,0.000884137,0.0003091569,0.000028497656,0.0003827215,0.000057735244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016415,0.00003722742,1.804178e-7,0.000059560585,0.00003902771,0.00009276006,0.005714546,0.000005853691,0.000050986455,0.5671533,0.42129713,0.0055330507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015676876,0.0001013451,0.0000031706766,0.00013633126,0.000046252368,0.00051247294,0.00006211125,0.000146373,0.0000019720992,0.21837497,0.78034115,0.00011710723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019757503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006331085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9520841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004248836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017189351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402485048","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2373128","title":"Against the extremes: Simmel’s social and economic pluralism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Oxford; McMaster University; Harvard University","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Positive economics; Economics","score_opus":0.07819909330377232,"score_gpt":0.3105184939609326,"score_spread":0.23231940065716028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402485048","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27474567,0.4106385,0.00059873326,0.09889029,0.04062099,0.0021268653,0.00041836532,0.00048124668,0.17147931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98736703,0.0032846066,0.0000365805,0.0010617328,0.003942161,0.000020468777,0.0000019925117,0.000027864424,0.0042575626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985879,0.00038069356,0.0003277311,0.00019561134,0.0002273924,0.00028066334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984513,0.0011307353,0.00016787626,0.00009757774,0.00006252137,0.00008998808],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023692236,0.00011740909,0.00025065197,0.000065777145,0.0015944984,0.00015391938,0.0005342728,0.00013639938,0.00019950987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021129377,0.00008887174,0.00045285965,0.000087678796,0.002183578,0.00021513585,0.000053906715,0.00046651578,0.000015376847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007548184,0.00006253782,0.000032576972,0.000048115377,0.00081078283,0.00006402284,0.03816761,0.000035805762,0.00010068858,0.67590535,0.23740456,0.047292497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024118237,0.000031411284,0.00032715144,0.000052579853,0.00017156998,0.000035906975,0.0019005426,0.00006410995,9.11819e-7,0.25740272,0.7396388,0.00013311804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003719802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021259997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71262133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076248974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002979901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402801162","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2383624","title":"Physical influx theory: the case of Émilie Du Châtelet","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Humanities","score_opus":0.028887612227805483,"score_gpt":0.2777691850215041,"score_spread":0.24888157279369863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402801162","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25972605,0.49334446,0.0008292943,0.024338108,0.028628508,0.0013191768,0.00039761982,0.00016596682,0.19125082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859771,0.0010357221,0.000026432765,0.00021986304,0.0032201791,0.000015488014,6.6090684e-7,0.000014107976,0.009490429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891454,0.0002509519,0.000262367,0.00011918822,0.0002763908,0.00017656012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985397,0.0009824933,0.00012268063,0.00010922623,0.00017642058,0.000069495916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013281585,0.00008889422,0.00021459744,0.000044397362,0.0010539038,0.000032952255,0.00036211868,0.000043114676,0.00013910054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034138374,0.000059483235,0.0003712313,0.00014576834,0.0012810437,0.00017673423,0.000036617555,0.00031760574,0.0000063474035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000734691,0.00019045068,0.0000072117878,0.00010597592,0.00023987793,0.00083363877,0.08149406,0.000006634039,0.000074483556,0.55883247,0.28699967,0.071142025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013239228,0.00007573835,0.000012896466,0.000094669864,0.00008610786,0.0007075909,0.0007966441,0.000031319476,0.0000032883372,0.14773348,0.85025704,0.00006881446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066074263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012657925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72625107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029448452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020285297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8105883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404481090","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2423398","title":"Scudéry’s portraits: patriarchy, agency, and genre","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical and Scientific Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Portrait; Agency (philosophy); Art; Philosophy; Literature; Sociology; Art history; Gender studies; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06173355360424425,"score_gpt":0.2732408484551356,"score_spread":0.21150729485089131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404481090","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01919166,0.933687,0.0008362372,0.006616412,0.01895482,0.0005457959,0.00012176178,0.00007254497,0.01997377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83660346,0.01368006,0.0010580039,0.00069520343,0.004101113,0.00003667824,0.00000977977,0.00006477034,0.14375095],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990156,0.00002459993,0.0003153154,0.00018493454,0.0002960624,0.00016344806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994214,0.00013263291,0.00006962541,0.000101694604,0.0001393981,0.00013521862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005735265,0.000093630806,0.0002485051,0.00009665448,0.0002980901,0.000024536037,0.00010560448,0.000043920973,0.00012729065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016139362,0.0000716024,0.00026205776,0.00009695765,0.0003659415,0.00007392713,0.0000282405,0.00028668236,0.000007969931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011297465,0.00012516498,0.00002957827,0.0006100917,0.0002891911,0.0007046263,0.0022357428,6.1634466e-7,0.0016383287,0.0022690976,0.7899207,0.20206387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061074976,0.0002235957,0.0011359757,0.00056733115,0.00026631937,0.0048000095,0.000058336158,0.0000749641,0.000009362473,0.015253603,0.9768955,0.00010424004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029525996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004653752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92000693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027719638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017827803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29198614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405425026","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2423396","title":"Aristotle on logical consequence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10385044286682055,"score_gpt":0.26105222523961646,"score_spread":0.15720178237279592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405425026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027392711,0.1087649,0.00045364408,0.022526966,0.03990365,0.00055867847,0.00043794842,0.00021017499,0.8244048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97269607,0.00029038213,0.00003578575,0.0011304067,0.0050551076,0.000016467911,0.0000041495086,0.000028621767,0.020743003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990389,0.000049288567,0.00031292977,0.00017482987,0.00025172954,0.0001723194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910253,0.0004872726,0.000094085095,0.00012829198,0.00010538974,0.00008245058],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033310635,0.00012113429,0.00019774718,0.000070383954,0.00048151158,0.00013717456,0.00028820068,0.000046802517,0.0012282028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000099654746,0.00009304967,0.00036730457,0.000023575547,0.0010286329,0.00014712576,0.0000208629,0.0004919958,0.00008422232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000698753,0.00011542808,8.935187e-8,0.00006256401,0.000064150525,0.0002967883,0.0009351432,0.0000062112176,0.00004670622,0.84874564,0.14011812,0.009539276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001415069,0.00015527967,0.0000017447343,0.00021840834,0.000033623284,0.00045590271,0.000025641179,0.00004793808,0.0000049476007,0.4444893,0.5543516,0.000074076816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027877239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019038416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9699568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023869608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010690432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406898838","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2445605","title":"James Africanus Beale Horton’s philosophy of history: progress, race, and the fate of Africa","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Philosophy; Race (biology); Epistemology; Ancient philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04218595766613161,"score_gpt":0.26533506381053545,"score_spread":0.22314910614440384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406898838","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007817878,0.7139609,0.000065084074,0.08234329,0.0040618577,0.001618406,0.00019222518,0.00004701679,0.18989334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831729,0.008432182,0.00017594005,0.00022550939,0.00064640236,0.00006210865,0.0000016224677,0.000015652726,0.0072676875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978236,0.00035056632,0.0007028571,0.0002268595,0.00059255207,0.00030356328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974793,0.0007535901,0.00087034755,0.00019781115,0.00059175305,0.000107160115],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014473463,0.00018970398,0.0007129513,0.000100768695,0.00088779524,0.000018643897,0.00074111915,0.00010892239,0.0000601942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055687194,0.00012943764,0.00046423168,0.000250177,0.007960205,0.00016348009,0.0001274786,0.00036672238,6.361719e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013633242,0.0005110652,0.0003748803,0.0004759538,0.0009501335,0.000016932287,0.037183885,0.0000074795116,0.00011284242,0.7059769,0.23078682,0.022239795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013107301,0.00013456609,0.00034004933,0.00031836488,0.00025457982,0.00001633184,0.00087015086,0.00000619533,0.000008057393,0.35332626,0.6432757,0.00013905847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062474987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007155219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.975355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048548356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003647243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99473953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407869643","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2455427","title":"Attribution arguments and the metaphysics of immanent actions: cognitive acts from Peter John Olivi to Durand of St. Pourçain","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; Univerzita Karlova v Praze","keywords":"Philosophy; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Attribution; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04936366166412882,"score_gpt":0.2583190484719532,"score_spread":0.20895538680782438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407869643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6444805,0.11735399,0.0066660596,0.035545636,0.022952756,0.0061812196,0.012218558,0.0000797467,0.15452154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99632835,0.0003688354,0.000029706047,0.00041048482,0.00065688224,0.000025351588,0.000017213686,0.000011590854,0.0021515784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887073,0.00013827918,0.00047752185,0.00013920607,0.0002432364,0.00013100209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832904,0.00072534697,0.0003950739,0.00012465811,0.0003728152,0.000053050167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041844413,0.00012642363,0.0003899392,0.000091111055,0.00040967684,0.00003908835,0.00020271355,0.000037479094,0.0001113703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015080736,0.00009331778,0.0003248877,0.00004566824,0.000891018,0.00017285079,0.0000550708,0.0002337214,0.0000014099494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031771383,0.0008437287,0.000018758137,0.00025033954,0.0019550812,0.0000087875005,0.011449108,0.000014097038,0.0007013906,0.94801664,0.018797413,0.014767498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053942273,0.00024598755,0.00095493335,0.0013736913,0.0010809595,0.000022614335,0.00073656044,0.000036394693,0.0005710638,0.688464,0.3009295,0.00019008433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016320047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000097680946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35184786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010355399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006915013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38053885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409347825","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2478974","title":"Monads, situation, and infinite explanation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0454345708368941,"score_gpt":0.23697599422328677,"score_spread":0.19154142338639268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409347825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013525364,0.1272372,0.0037678846,0.041203283,0.026724588,0.0012252895,0.0003071552,0.00012457627,0.7858847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757862,0.0005425489,0.000051707317,0.0010594912,0.0015249716,0.00001697692,0.000009510582,0.000011369414,0.020997215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993664,0.000033765846,0.00027754996,0.00009712668,0.00013230825,0.00009281907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993011,0.00022416076,0.00015306345,0.0000796569,0.00020521783,0.00003680348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025978716,0.00007648962,0.00014029481,0.00009712888,0.000557904,0.00006807862,0.00013736701,0.000031274045,0.0001407709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010462643,0.00007008981,0.00010902701,0.00002373589,0.00037269108,0.00020392647,0.000020067851,0.00017084931,0.000002496086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004902489,0.00006406662,0.000003866698,0.000049209102,0.00006317421,0.0000037170603,0.0019917435,0.0000049049127,0.000023818302,0.8810079,0.09674476,0.019993806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000366855,0.000030602627,0.00006178606,0.00007212844,0.0000413833,0.000021932741,0.0000791249,0.000056692268,0.0000031877235,0.46883747,0.53038055,0.000048306087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004927326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000110444154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96226084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009638421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062297266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42910028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410596923","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2496270","title":"W.E.B. Du Bois’ misrecognition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Theology","score_opus":0.04389203167010317,"score_gpt":0.23975084097444252,"score_spread":0.19585880930433935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410596923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012421248,0.06858794,0.0018235337,0.03067874,0.07803772,0.0009501801,0.0002372168,0.00011168411,0.80715173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644354,0.00077297376,0.00012794908,0.001932594,0.004356827,0.000055039432,0.0000201273,0.000019997173,0.0282791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992176,0.00005200663,0.00034843996,0.00010815923,0.00013781202,0.00013597624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991091,0.00021028922,0.00022404132,0.000116248695,0.00030167753,0.00003865993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042366635,0.00009340735,0.00015667616,0.000114175826,0.0008052202,0.000081388556,0.00026623468,0.00003805165,0.0006882538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014916835,0.00009012382,0.00021347127,0.000026107284,0.000381691,0.00028029183,0.000017427345,0.00020986579,0.000014485741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005938026,0.00019757712,0.000004143752,0.00010485732,0.000104600564,0.000003992388,0.004358322,0.0000037478824,0.0000283582,0.48463753,0.4786077,0.03188979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003598119,0.000037290236,0.000042517284,0.00020053839,0.00007329974,0.00007321122,0.00022506423,0.000024226205,0.00000861588,0.44046614,0.5584222,0.000067104724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008435425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043684344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95201415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002125934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015268456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75358963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412571404","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2527980","title":"Towards a “halfway plausible theory of ethics”: judgement in Arendt’s critique of Kant’s moral philosophy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Philosophy; Epistemology; Moral philosophy; Normative ethics","score_opus":0.10595416758706072,"score_gpt":0.3569349345724565,"score_spread":0.2509807669853958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412571404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02448245,0.058881473,0.0056636767,0.096417286,0.01675663,0.0037827948,0.001324022,0.00014765574,0.792544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944975,0.00085347396,0.00068374345,0.0014214221,0.0007376404,0.00005466345,0.0000053808476,0.00003566737,0.0017105484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954751,0.0011287516,0.0013909407,0.00035169697,0.0010554622,0.0005980137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963731,0.0014414218,0.0006676967,0.00034690453,0.00095115707,0.0002197037],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056754723,0.0002626004,0.0008211904,0.0005779115,0.0005084735,0.000031574113,0.0012674525,0.00034174454,0.00026653535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003046571,0.0002782713,0.00063572126,0.00048364053,0.002689818,0.00035473143,0.00015857974,0.0011989393,0.0000028455552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003170212,0.00066746376,0.00015737709,0.00053853926,0.00016999827,0.000027289783,0.005314421,0.00004753648,0.00019951668,0.98131424,0.008018458,0.003228124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014372097,0.00022978026,0.0006452022,0.0015312327,0.00013203315,0.00002080835,0.000667397,0.000016944987,0.00028962907,0.9616346,0.033159487,0.00023569942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002679951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084432855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.970015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00103642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023135971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413875675","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2547655","title":"Richard FitzRalph on the will and instantaneous volition: a critical edition of book I, Question 10 from Richard FitzRalph’s <i>Lectura in Sententias</i> (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 137)","year":2025,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Medieval Philosophy and Theology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Volition (linguistics); Critical edition; Humanities; Classics; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03080547455585664,"score_gpt":0.25636944047600463,"score_spread":0.225563965920148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413875675","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07008224,0.8319153,0.00047625828,0.04128874,0.028418068,0.0020375533,0.0029514874,0.00006146596,0.022768859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97099423,0.015281013,0.000054876702,0.0045008524,0.0045481925,0.000065283355,0.00006537867,0.00005379532,0.004436355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967427,0.0006823105,0.0011539161,0.00046168335,0.00048061967,0.0004787167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604136,0.0022394138,0.0005938152,0.0003269945,0.0006591924,0.00013923507],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001015464,0.0004091527,0.0007726165,0.00029682447,0.0012343333,0.00012227503,0.00047153723,0.00020865178,0.0007458992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089979975,0.0003428232,0.0004353423,0.000106580286,0.0034806773,0.0003959758,0.00011734777,0.0009933427,0.000014827161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003816073,0.0011745507,0.000039032224,0.0013368607,0.0017915717,0.00045973863,0.010099815,0.000043233456,0.0002562937,0.7402623,0.23525742,0.0054630744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022404324,0.0011020355,0.00029410011,0.004889578,0.001212529,0.00025294622,0.00053595693,0.00021880977,0.00004477717,0.7068022,0.28202716,0.00037949905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043148437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022791809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.900912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005105929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018089669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414753228","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2551577","title":"Is Spinoza a dualist?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Dualism; Subject (documents); Relation (database); Ontology; Idiosyncrasy; Philosophy of mind","score_opus":0.07921737422259575,"score_gpt":0.27660107335320183,"score_spread":0.19738369913060608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414753228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020608378,0.10794808,0.0010085248,0.07645584,0.042534836,0.0010052356,0.00092304975,0.0001187962,0.7679448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7104777,0.0012035752,0.00026958346,0.024484709,0.009614055,0.00006147551,0.000018831233,0.00006129455,0.25380877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987625,0.00006163332,0.00048129086,0.00017496973,0.00025152255,0.00026810286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999054,0.00022983384,0.00017065428,0.00018727363,0.00025432327,0.00010391869],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003222465,0.00014472051,0.00028172074,0.00009271081,0.00062912225,0.00008619487,0.00042794214,0.000056074758,0.0019042973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009019583,0.00012274807,0.00050324656,0.000034986508,0.00061833626,0.0001410553,0.000048351787,0.00035302495,0.000023575498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005910618,0.00016501409,0.0000022609172,0.0000838754,0.000120001794,0.000011135985,0.0009823844,8.7175056e-7,0.00000829335,0.6868086,0.3068428,0.004915676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004666503,0.000054237993,0.000015516956,0.00018842416,0.00007600619,0.000065310254,0.000050690564,0.000022707256,0.000007743359,0.40604293,0.5929269,0.000082847655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012709892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001648835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7084169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019880901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111720605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414779733","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2560453","title":"The infinite divisibility and multiplicity of creatures: Conway’s non-absolutist theory of space","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Multiplicity (mathematics); Divisibility rule; Space (punctuation); Infinite divisibility","score_opus":0.03629113902323856,"score_gpt":0.23922591347079256,"score_spread":0.202934774447554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414779733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12478354,0.28489622,0.0048596286,0.009730042,0.025158979,0.0028625834,0.0013412841,0.000076150696,0.5462916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99117666,0.00055883464,0.00006013834,0.00014732243,0.000276563,0.000008640097,8.7690967e-7,0.000008437253,0.0077624964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986955,0.00013635692,0.0005553095,0.00017176168,0.0002664895,0.00017461064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972554,0.0015342281,0.00047104995,0.00027467584,0.00040163705,0.00006299607],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015371199,0.00012440747,0.00034186107,0.000075649645,0.0011017466,0.000038232913,0.0005288176,0.000053127813,0.000042571657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061706454,0.000088541805,0.00026543028,0.000055374763,0.0036533766,0.00014683818,0.000077753895,0.0003220796,4.7344312e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039546343,0.00022969139,0.00006905835,0.00024444418,0.00013181314,0.0000028701697,0.008873708,0.000011267508,0.00034173913,0.9602821,0.020262364,0.009155485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008776482,0.00023162126,0.0013574858,0.0003591962,0.00011791774,0.000022450069,0.00051898556,0.00011505402,0.000051806335,0.63177955,0.3644293,0.000138997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023787838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000194637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86639315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014357468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015309187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416307882","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2511060","title":"Blueprint for cosmopolitan philosophy: a post-Eurocentric proposal","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint","score_opus":0.05497622349358694,"score_gpt":0.32517569184304773,"score_spread":0.2701994683494608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416307882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050491835,0.06167946,0.009907784,0.30750552,0.03530679,0.0065189907,0.0011062579,0.0003193356,0.5726067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97273034,0.0010466027,0.0012051006,0.006676995,0.0046113185,0.00014704259,0.000013014793,0.00005442473,0.013515161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976146,0.0002585702,0.0006429638,0.00030055866,0.00053408986,0.0006492057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969598,0.0011640695,0.0003096609,0.0002463941,0.0010379369,0.000282109],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002065013,0.00019489651,0.00038931836,0.00019945942,0.0018832809,0.00008117994,0.0009427759,0.00022053735,0.000057605448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025938717,0.00019618514,0.0006374057,0.0002199351,0.0017303509,0.0002611402,0.00007251951,0.0006604375,0.000007203391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026052745,0.00029286486,0.000010139152,0.00021729126,0.00012262355,0.000012987264,0.0011306703,0.000006102043,0.000049312086,0.9526219,0.041386086,0.0038895367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009711873,0.00015147502,0.00006081804,0.00024496403,0.0001263547,0.000038225808,0.00019072884,0.00002524703,0.000014776162,0.75847834,0.23953733,0.0001605548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032479825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000708632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96768117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012522368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021233181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}