{"meta":{"query_hash":"dbaf8de7cf19","filters":{"venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy"},"cohort_total":52,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":52,"exported":52,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/dbaf8de7cf19","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=British+Journal+for+the+History+of+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W1966471514","doi":"10.1080/09608780600792067","title":"Alternative possibilities in descartes's fourth meditation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meditation; Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.04967137649723556,"score_gpt":0.23549721133796947,"score_spread":0.1858258348407339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966471514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011611034,0.0049284087,0.004492165,0.0099406075,0.0011437435,0.000015839116,0.00008564629,0.00013196477,0.96765053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8341065,0.0025519552,0.0042327372,0.0016285494,0.00060593156,0.000055147833,0.00007468543,0.0000989023,0.15664554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990627,0.00048548004,0.000024501906,0.0000933254,0.00020998695,0.00012400992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995272,0.00020029728,0.00002909247,0.00010061893,0.000078442994,0.000064451284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009671043,0.00056035013,0.0002452039,0.001043806,0.0032437274,0.00422419,0.0005829286,0.0013442189,0.0061299843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016340945,0.000219304,0.00040586753,0.00051393075,0.013936694,0.002331129,0.0019628345,0.003029138,0.0016244696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020858884,0.0000048339716,0.00002739692,0.000013639624,0.0000013148953,0.000057763467,0.0032463477,0.0000862865,0.00005736267,0.9843485,0.009099493,0.003036354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002463434,0.000024061483,0.00026025638,0.00006286581,0.0000053707527,0.0001848076,0.0020867973,0.00041835842,0.0005365776,0.48815468,0.50821716,0.00002449605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005880249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00577045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061299843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053578047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009713341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038873732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971960450","doi":"10.1080/09608780801969266","title":"Modernity, The Human Animal and Philosophical Tradition","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dominican University College","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophical methodology","score_opus":0.12834011770641915,"score_gpt":0.2577913704305848,"score_spread":0.12945125272416566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971960450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06433745,0.13147257,0.004801173,0.06989121,0.001270917,0.000018655435,0.0000860653,0.000039554394,0.7280825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528468,0.015639171,0.0013699502,0.003382864,0.0013235155,0.00002209905,0.000025732588,0.0000361864,0.02535371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851817,0.0008958783,0.00004752679,0.0001885779,0.00017973117,0.00017016119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680907,0.0023123105,0.0002041363,0.0002988951,0.0001930747,0.00018242939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030284757,0.00021750502,0.00045664443,0.0018136634,0.0041428013,0.005033706,0.0005921795,0.0023047382,0.008611529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036116573,0.00024654387,0.00019247437,0.0020463187,0.043026768,0.0052655702,0.0019668017,0.0040917015,0.00043190335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009171938,0.0000073770952,0.00016800474,0.00003054512,0.000003951877,0.000016619151,0.0047893818,0.000041548097,0.000025943316,0.9905847,0.0013481453,0.0029746173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025125542,0.000015420695,0.0011677723,0.00020136859,0.00000750635,0.00005535915,0.0028471637,0.0000960646,0.000034635967,0.84927166,0.14626774,0.000010165549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008430821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015094687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008611529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057466845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032947673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041695237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979382472","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2011.533025","title":"Boyle: Between God and Science","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Philosophy; Haven; Theology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.1423156055555705,"score_gpt":0.23901434666155913,"score_spread":0.09669874110598864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979382472","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021545761,0.51601774,0.002862776,0.17795303,0.0072242976,0.000022026788,0.0001988349,0.00016838918,0.29339835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15536773,0.23498586,0.0053393682,0.05050023,0.007368384,0.00012311152,0.00023846304,0.00046418438,0.5456127],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988973,0.00059614144,0.000025254098,0.00012888528,0.00024438452,0.000108010754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935,0.00028222078,0.000066887835,0.00004473633,0.00011060148,0.00014558867],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012251006,0.0009116577,0.0004308211,0.0010661859,0.006196451,0.0049022483,0.00088809896,0.0037244658,0.027536105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023250973,0.00044025588,0.00021524844,0.0011646627,0.0073448285,0.0101100905,0.0034853434,0.004913326,0.006405208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000357809,0.00001106206,0.00009934572,0.0001657164,0.000005518624,0.00018782819,0.008252438,0.00007034099,0.00014430475,0.2346221,0.72739685,0.029008698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039460456,0.000006411059,0.00027555067,0.00032356742,0.000001645683,0.0001360594,0.0024802776,0.00003262711,0.00010354902,0.030647475,0.96598065,0.0000081886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02135382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04834161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99380356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033117773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003146118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09211743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986418568","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2010.502359","title":"Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Monad (category theory); Philosophy; Epistemology; Pure mathematics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.050401322834986044,"score_gpt":0.22289333520599555,"score_spread":0.1724920123710095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986418568","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00086430804,0.83577913,0.002021115,0.025778681,0.0031971748,0.000013251502,0.00027014856,0.00025983626,0.13181639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11359135,0.6142024,0.004349411,0.010199358,0.009201742,0.00014055328,0.00077802356,0.00044007116,0.24709713],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988943,0.00027172908,0.00008821491,0.00014980369,0.0004563979,0.00013955744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956816,0.0001383129,0.000064313186,0.00005911207,0.00008827072,0.00008174435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013117159,0.0014009111,0.0009912045,0.0031884415,0.002309816,0.007348278,0.0008938002,0.0028298951,0.023313556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002223592,0.0006237253,0.0003257767,0.004129867,0.0059139137,0.0122495685,0.0036192413,0.003541842,0.012441893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044000866,0.000020354206,0.00025106792,0.000471641,0.000016529448,0.00013939706,0.002044659,0.00016657301,0.00025051876,0.41056684,0.4237443,0.16228408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007705657,0.000008489903,0.00078881613,0.00049781735,0.0000053814215,0.00017981567,0.0006977007,0.000060267885,0.00014354092,0.11117394,0.88642156,0.000014933845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010468484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0133155035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023313556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003966857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003038764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077991605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996729878","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2014.900605","title":"Leibniz on Infinite Numbers, Infinite Wholes, and Composite Substances","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Infinity; Pure mathematics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04977420463295627,"score_gpt":0.2241849010707028,"score_spread":0.17441069643774654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996729878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036905438,0.07146221,0.053492628,0.035015035,0.0015461392,0.000041598312,0.00020278514,0.00011548025,0.8012187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.887177,0.021447651,0.014322878,0.0064116525,0.0022341858,0.0001622835,0.00016090395,0.00012076057,0.06796265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981304,0.0007985928,0.000073266114,0.000285316,0.00055557524,0.00015688557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847025,0.0009495838,0.000109479915,0.00018493942,0.0001861281,0.000099590994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028691848,0.00065678364,0.00069334503,0.0018424051,0.0037146697,0.006593428,0.0008982992,0.00235825,0.0024444724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003884159,0.00028706036,0.00063970825,0.0013846674,0.025169024,0.008752588,0.002698416,0.0035846364,0.00066769397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023613231,0.0000012170744,0.000020880767,0.000006877103,0.0000011195161,0.000014079391,0.00018373015,0.0000671039,0.000018422432,0.9983885,0.000620383,0.0006752931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024345838,0.00000283151,0.000051512696,0.00002237205,0.0000015936862,0.000012820091,0.00007258803,0.00009659727,0.000033898163,0.98645395,0.013245949,0.0000034866089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004634414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034868326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006593428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005708074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019667672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041415155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000887925","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.666849","title":"Lucretius: His Continuing Influence and Contemporary Relevance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.054385425522036276,"score_gpt":0.23472526856301126,"score_spread":0.180339843040975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000887925","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01033978,0.44036713,0.0017143006,0.22900166,0.0066245454,0.000013160573,0.000044527635,0.00009202393,0.3118029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5790697,0.1817348,0.0017490974,0.036266282,0.01846872,0.000053650874,0.00006119403,0.00039482545,0.18220186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546236,0.002721812,0.00010599733,0.00045146167,0.0008124826,0.00044591824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703896,0.0018914437,0.00021018887,0.00024745404,0.00035498795,0.00025700568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005087714,0.0007041258,0.00072550547,0.0018630552,0.0051475903,0.009959158,0.0009457474,0.0037585904,0.005027157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008557064,0.00036606015,0.00029673407,0.0016781554,0.028590381,0.009122162,0.0041538565,0.0050882767,0.0023255586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006244896,0.000018279035,0.00030110305,0.00018618585,0.000010372794,0.00028830222,0.027716212,0.00010197541,0.00016546168,0.700289,0.18249707,0.088363476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000791591,0.000016392609,0.0004387693,0.00047176442,0.0000037719758,0.00019752765,0.0034327093,0.000058726706,0.00012453267,0.07451269,0.92071766,0.000017546245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007961046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0080558965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009959158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067499685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004361324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048974693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003469035","doi":"10.1080/09608780903135253","title":"The Invention of Altruism: Making Moral Meanings in Victorian Britain","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dominican University College; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04005347515820541,"score_gpt":0.29598224036586585,"score_spread":0.25592876520766045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003469035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27188557,0.009184237,0.0070893434,0.09989273,0.00059472065,0.000051757637,0.0000907085,0.000043851087,0.6111671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693783,0.00049152004,0.00063134095,0.002197633,0.000057999812,0.000014727718,0.000007791486,0.0000417268,0.027179027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99102414,0.0057009156,0.00018510279,0.0006125856,0.0011022398,0.0013749626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947733,0.0028317512,0.0003455416,0.0005170049,0.0007362565,0.0007960921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007847779,0.00023100528,0.00050494657,0.00082479534,0.0130722,0.009104882,0.0013829594,0.0061309747,0.0057581794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014194421,0.0005962143,0.00022721314,0.0012676857,0.04697353,0.0046543195,0.0055050827,0.008600415,0.0006260596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041789237,0.000015377052,0.00043863192,0.00007127657,0.000006314956,0.00015416412,0.05635488,0.00017055204,0.00032065267,0.9310611,0.0037120087,0.007653226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005432361,0.00003772458,0.0051496755,0.00023096836,0.000016005173,0.00017928115,0.024318794,0.0008221996,0.0004083891,0.72157055,0.24714291,0.00006917971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.107096225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14072946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107096225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022258881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012989429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2129457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007126587","doi":"10.1080/09608781003643618","title":"The Ontological Argument from Descartes to Hegel","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Ontological argument; Epistemology; Humanity; Theology; Philosophy of religion","score_opus":0.0536098042117221,"score_gpt":0.2376220770187749,"score_spread":0.18401227280705282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007126587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00986722,0.1861912,0.020619806,0.11318051,0.0049385293,0.00002441357,0.00020993441,0.00012174094,0.66484666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76544863,0.06876283,0.010815064,0.023377495,0.0056033167,0.00012399751,0.00019161604,0.00029288654,0.12538423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744296,0.0015232462,0.00007456543,0.0001783788,0.00059687,0.00018390502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766445,0.0015003869,0.000095234565,0.00023297593,0.0003889409,0.000118061624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002676349,0.0005749944,0.0008296813,0.00228411,0.0036682647,0.005314647,0.0008748527,0.002561453,0.0048137372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051197684,0.00041035868,0.0005043282,0.0021157588,0.022869293,0.009205116,0.0024669159,0.004010019,0.001607478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054449615,0.000004173292,0.00001813987,0.00002078317,0.0000027902593,0.000022637803,0.0007925381,0.000058360205,0.000013882242,0.9859108,0.010447689,0.002702672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035088983,0.000002623781,0.00006207292,0.00004707075,0.00000241857,0.000027947417,0.0004739008,0.00006003756,0.000069301255,0.939439,0.059806522,0.0000055268033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010058553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00776728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010058553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005290827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026358035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038387775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009023040","doi":"10.1080/09608780802548473","title":"The Real Significance of Bayle's Authorship of theAvis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04814873432005233,"score_gpt":0.30437151656318573,"score_spread":0.2562227822431334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009023040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05893914,0.0064609307,0.0051396745,0.28010604,0.010257174,0.000012907106,0.0001691359,0.00019370328,0.6387213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88034695,0.0009660547,0.0007423794,0.010174561,0.0019876088,0.000013315277,0.000022990023,0.00010992221,0.105636336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970372,0.0014401921,0.00010430737,0.0004251323,0.0005884305,0.00040473725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884958,0.007358269,0.0007400621,0.0010315091,0.0018400049,0.0005342776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032267312,0.00022167304,0.00029170973,0.00092439173,0.0068276203,0.008008072,0.00073674193,0.004511726,0.010200742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015289273,0.00030707076,0.00012245544,0.00095701625,0.011673953,0.0048357053,0.003208056,0.0064902185,0.0015695302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046445955,0.0000067138917,0.00045176828,0.00003940021,0.000004713445,0.00011562443,0.01113871,0.00003912716,0.00011386321,0.9131482,0.06412471,0.010770668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027867625,0.000028049042,0.0018303472,0.00020995273,0.000013575173,0.00031371208,0.005803483,0.00037261727,0.0007637736,0.20615776,0.784436,0.00004289124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005896419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012441612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010200742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003329623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002355213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03412485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016777474","doi":"10.1080/0960878032000058473","title":"The World as Representation: Schopenhauer's Arguments for Transcendental Idealism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Transcendental idealism; Philosophy; Transcendental number; Representation (politics); Epistemology; Politics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05727256063038989,"score_gpt":0.2804476096165112,"score_spread":0.22317504898612134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016777474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015859118,0.056281194,0.050470717,0.18694581,0.0018046305,0.000038845603,0.00013190618,0.00009893469,0.6883688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88920164,0.021519452,0.0116296755,0.016402747,0.0018607782,0.00012633282,0.00009918132,0.00018047857,0.05897989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764687,0.0011895656,0.00008238992,0.00020167744,0.0006218661,0.00025754943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971541,0.002149323,0.00013209539,0.0002145568,0.00025537025,0.000094646995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045028855,0.0006389137,0.00069926557,0.0017999619,0.003692523,0.007597495,0.0012537942,0.0051117768,0.0077657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006829839,0.0003826826,0.0008612424,0.0028161083,0.023460384,0.020728042,0.00471961,0.0070417724,0.0013760824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004308747,0.0000025169038,0.0000074329364,0.0000055611645,9.488885e-7,0.00000776641,0.00048029752,0.000058521975,0.000010124017,0.996258,0.0021519763,0.0010126722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004664064,0.0000021333205,0.000023046918,0.000021530635,0.00000102263,0.000011973414,0.0001847817,0.000079849066,0.00002827079,0.988246,0.011394031,0.000002628006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030973386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032762883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054314286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023847509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03940797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028483080","doi":"10.1080/09608780210143254","title":"Religion and the reflective self: Coleridge’s platonism revisited","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Travel Writing and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Dominican University College","funders":"","keywords":"Platonism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.030957831949499314,"score_gpt":0.21419336047973958,"score_spread":0.18323552853024028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028483080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058590755,0.014848335,0.016951498,0.2112013,0.0015431553,0.00008617093,0.000044826218,0.0000759852,0.696658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96258414,0.002055999,0.0034190186,0.010842298,0.0008674491,0.00006966118,0.00001527872,0.00007299887,0.02007307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693716,0.0018114703,0.000107228,0.00042647697,0.0004000119,0.00031767666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99315876,0.004846234,0.00037587492,0.00061174325,0.0005555625,0.00045182978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056978674,0.0003796711,0.0006854205,0.0016702309,0.008321793,0.009358693,0.001653332,0.005855257,0.0053124977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011102316,0.00037995097,0.00038263793,0.0017569521,0.074196905,0.011890536,0.0044571077,0.010448019,0.00057526137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008635973,0.0000071776994,0.000075204756,0.000012423462,0.000001395362,0.00002859573,0.012582686,0.000026714462,0.000010888456,0.9826434,0.002339132,0.0022637295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028843364,0.000006852311,0.00021112373,0.00008042668,0.000003856385,0.00007701833,0.005709092,0.0001511897,0.000043668133,0.94897395,0.044703197,0.000010654137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014848066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018202778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014848066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005167239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052040974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037491143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032427725","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2013.771609","title":"Embodying Justice in Ancient Egypt:<i>The Tale of the Eloquent Peasant</i>as a Classic of Political Philosophy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Peasant; Ideal (ethics); State (computer science); Literature; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03853613673637077,"score_gpt":0.2756476520904255,"score_spread":0.23711151535405475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032427725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12629984,0.054845586,0.0066135116,0.11064721,0.002144547,0.00004159099,0.000083119536,0.00010443975,0.69922024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92286617,0.006068064,0.0009917724,0.00798728,0.0006824001,0.000016121621,0.000020346237,0.000045728768,0.06132205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916077,0.00037438964,0.000027592587,0.00006569976,0.00018464898,0.00018688776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954104,0.00020804344,0.000056800945,0.000036012996,0.00011739589,0.000040695093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013322751,0.00034039706,0.0002612182,0.00095979444,0.006675704,0.0054728,0.00047982752,0.0019940007,0.0021134354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016367611,0.0001253851,0.00016297633,0.0010141196,0.022815922,0.0028136428,0.0019507916,0.0033549564,0.0003654421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028107872,0.000014483464,0.00031304083,0.00011678866,0.000008683645,0.00024833524,0.05479625,0.00022764152,0.0002731826,0.9180147,0.013198718,0.012760208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021099193,0.000036484762,0.0024110312,0.00038334762,0.000018420393,0.00042279236,0.042928394,0.00043433672,0.00094931445,0.3273854,0.6249698,0.000039570838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01646328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017075438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01646328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007740617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031351144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056162357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059453367","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.664025","title":"Scepticism and the Development of the Transcendental Dialectic","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Dialectic; Epistemology; Transcendental number; Transcendental idealism; Critical philosophy; Reflexive pronoun","score_opus":0.06562803257129741,"score_gpt":0.23684473839375003,"score_spread":0.17121670582245263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059453367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17325522,0.014328008,0.039757457,0.052789494,0.00043525264,0.000045742792,0.000045032284,0.00012424508,0.7192195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98907614,0.0006852563,0.0019003655,0.00084401586,0.000056738085,0.000017528377,0.0000069929774,0.000012003682,0.007400938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923739,0.005268954,0.00016800669,0.0005574593,0.001315047,0.0003166798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943198,0.0035930262,0.00046140185,0.0005541201,0.0007943773,0.00027714844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069593983,0.00029795276,0.00033464815,0.0019431924,0.003151646,0.0068293153,0.00091003487,0.0023495348,0.0020784403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006581352,0.000213806,0.00031027902,0.0011959665,0.05522422,0.0050368137,0.0052780635,0.0050602336,0.0002875737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049058235,0.0000038421626,0.00007326388,0.000012429317,0.0000019994122,0.000037526308,0.0058650803,0.00010957559,0.00006557888,0.9918988,0.00031017014,0.0016170094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011635958,0.000009458145,0.00025015432,0.00006009358,0.0000027295887,0.00006338659,0.0020878266,0.00039757648,0.00019538341,0.9769746,0.019938933,0.000008269485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025313569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017403135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00853536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00853536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003972274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06192863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065711826","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.679779","title":"Hume and Ancient Philosophy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Literature; Ancient philosophy; Classics; History; Art","score_opus":0.0851335377081105,"score_gpt":0.24956637360070438,"score_spread":0.1644328358925939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065711826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042398285,0.115819454,0.0058124703,0.09011226,0.0022449114,0.000019692166,0.000064594795,0.000069284964,0.74345905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.864473,0.026553197,0.0020324918,0.017850276,0.0023003074,0.000023906276,0.00003068552,0.00005661155,0.08667955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983216,0.0010780853,0.000032270604,0.00012451425,0.00027564142,0.00016793027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985544,0.0010079589,0.00009536853,0.00008563704,0.0001534472,0.000103191545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019855893,0.0002714746,0.00025464589,0.0014911288,0.0053660264,0.0036006817,0.00045983706,0.0023393624,0.0046088723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026978294,0.00013494257,0.00018834615,0.0010976556,0.029221237,0.0031277167,0.0021464345,0.0028677776,0.00089056994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012242943,0.0000050631725,0.00011710223,0.00003960847,0.0000030554047,0.00005400104,0.0107694045,0.00007660579,0.000038711754,0.9742509,0.0073480327,0.0072853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009530232,0.000018603707,0.0005577683,0.00028961335,0.000003260735,0.00020001749,0.0043265424,0.00013286124,0.00013453368,0.4950538,0.49926236,0.00001116404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038089405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004285257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053660264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042432654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019644604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03078723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067132141","doi":"10.1080/09608780902763675","title":"‘Historical Dictionary of Nietzscheanism’, ‘On the Genealogy of Morality’ and ‘Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and None’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Zoroaster; Philosophy; History; Classics; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06658631615997454,"score_gpt":0.24746486811588847,"score_spread":0.18087855195591393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067132141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019286422,0.20967859,0.006145317,0.046233483,0.006439331,0.000056394394,0.0013683395,0.00018028523,0.7279697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10058699,0.1897847,0.012026103,0.016797297,0.0051613697,0.00025270242,0.0028131013,0.0006447114,0.671933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989968,0.0004083012,0.00007521286,0.0001000211,0.00033076527,0.00008885345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995009,0.00019023674,0.00005362037,0.000057931735,0.0001553867,0.000041987845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009438633,0.00076610694,0.00042263133,0.0024181344,0.0028914502,0.0037362296,0.0009726717,0.0016917145,0.03251325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022935432,0.00033521204,0.0002343864,0.0038279658,0.004515068,0.0057848054,0.0014828751,0.0026053789,0.007841115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013503123,0.000011182105,0.000109720946,0.0002827458,0.000005256193,0.00008457475,0.004835896,0.00008885803,0.00020357678,0.46918148,0.46848598,0.056697223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001242907,0.0000017621524,0.00017183782,0.00012449677,7.720889e-7,0.00006096803,0.00036734555,0.00001142274,0.000038213562,0.014301954,0.9849165,0.0000033473468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016826099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049350217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03251325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046770433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005720426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10876769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069475098","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2010.524770","title":"The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Medieval Philosophy and Theology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Regent College","funders":"","keywords":"Medieval philosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology; History of philosophy; Classics; History","score_opus":0.04619760930760119,"score_gpt":0.22829497090150214,"score_spread":0.18209736159390094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069475098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016188994,0.21980904,0.0012184066,0.077933565,0.0028521025,0.000027607337,0.0003183401,0.0000629492,0.681589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7617225,0.05527664,0.0010827719,0.008863484,0.0054610814,0.00006634287,0.00016447822,0.00015302833,0.1672096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871814,0.0006464971,0.00004752756,0.00017558796,0.0002746075,0.00013762263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983197,0.0009445398,0.00008654975,0.00019553081,0.00025067106,0.00020307068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016464901,0.00045413597,0.00052915,0.0035811532,0.003721691,0.0059968983,0.00068592397,0.002796034,0.022925949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045319735,0.00044632534,0.00017857055,0.0022389786,0.02196603,0.0053141555,0.0024885777,0.0039791754,0.0015993547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029824434,0.000010321882,0.00014665155,0.000101737875,0.0000063366547,0.00005222967,0.0035719199,0.000043964093,0.00010932997,0.9705917,0.018186511,0.007149561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003965871,0.000019476454,0.0027768454,0.0005142981,0.000008881258,0.00012450038,0.0018305896,0.000091255795,0.00015790114,0.2708517,0.7235678,0.000017095937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029706785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034592085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029706785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019947745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034631472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1447317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079914764","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.689750","title":"The Limits of Experience and Explanation: F. A. Lange and Ernst Mach on Things in Themselves","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Relation (database); Philosophy; Denial; Vision; Mach number; Inference; Philosophy of science; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Theology; Computer science; Mechanics; Physics","score_opus":0.08236861792178442,"score_gpt":0.2544564984952087,"score_spread":0.17208788057342428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079914764","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040913653,0.17880304,0.032747038,0.546066,0.00415183,0.000028683971,0.000088466004,0.00015335256,0.1970479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.911341,0.03269898,0.008497613,0.024530716,0.004596202,0.00008872724,0.000040581093,0.00012171641,0.01808441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679023,0.0019261984,0.000068169276,0.00035853125,0.0006302716,0.00022652277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99400526,0.0048976364,0.00025804495,0.0003307418,0.00030476804,0.00020351127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042899717,0.0005754292,0.0006949417,0.001279901,0.003619972,0.0069371206,0.00092876,0.0052733086,0.0016970962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008434661,0.00044758266,0.00043655053,0.00082107994,0.037731003,0.014578153,0.0035859665,0.007228892,0.00044181294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020969897,0.000018827255,0.00015516454,0.0000441343,0.0000062227737,0.000087430766,0.0063350797,0.0002708803,0.00006464003,0.97564554,0.00890553,0.008445515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000109774755,0.0000064526785,0.000105641615,0.000086662054,0.0000029753073,0.00005032879,0.00080239476,0.00024200017,0.000043678483,0.9652146,0.033423346,0.000011040195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029899261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002452587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069371206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030080187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026429824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022687793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081716706","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2011.650975","title":"Malebranche, the Quietists, and Freedom","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Context (archaeology); Period (music); Epistemology; History; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.041311710720692,"score_gpt":0.2629524950018639,"score_spread":0.2216407842811719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081716706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054905742,0.041863307,0.0035429099,0.13837472,0.001018468,0.000021006885,0.000056557084,0.000026581542,0.76019067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8836969,0.0059448835,0.00055732706,0.0056275954,0.00061354577,0.000032179152,0.000017578825,0.000040049817,0.103469975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708396,0.0018143964,0.000041436087,0.0002546609,0.00044575147,0.00035977113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986015,0.0007882327,0.00013777082,0.0000979337,0.00010889303,0.00026564332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027253816,0.00031677345,0.0003878396,0.0008722475,0.009268171,0.006640902,0.00038757827,0.0025578337,0.0053070425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036527277,0.00023655473,0.00018398462,0.00076327124,0.041543443,0.0053273845,0.0056162057,0.0041001784,0.0006979147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017671473,0.000004702356,0.0001434659,0.000018371184,0.0000021283638,0.000053032596,0.016259018,0.00003770586,0.00006442815,0.9722334,0.007190442,0.003975452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002052218,0.000021080737,0.0013275918,0.00017362295,0.0000035911407,0.000135388,0.009686418,0.000064895044,0.00013238133,0.4315903,0.556826,0.000018200446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008994511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014522211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009268171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053658327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030978792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038932025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091317637","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2011.583413","title":"The Unity of Efficient and Final Causality: The Mind/Body Problem Reconsidered","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Causality (physics); Mind–body problem; Epistemology; Physics","score_opus":0.1518580751963127,"score_gpt":0.24092429234221252,"score_spread":0.08906621714589982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091317637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095014736,0.010769859,0.14291877,0.084756084,0.0017408329,0.00006117169,0.00016375593,0.00014786852,0.66442686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684397,0.0018680409,0.008326256,0.0025969297,0.00045709102,0.00005514814,0.000052206036,0.00007174983,0.018132886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969097,0.0017014602,0.00010955802,0.00043762443,0.00053850294,0.00030318793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961408,0.0024474426,0.00028473613,0.00042591282,0.00051699305,0.00018408296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005114683,0.00032844333,0.00056733674,0.0016648505,0.0034773448,0.005482638,0.00094858377,0.0032124934,0.00872686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065972335,0.0002788627,0.00066538015,0.0012619057,0.03175946,0.011446875,0.0048727854,0.004414919,0.0005444984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000298412,0.0000020752407,0.000038591115,0.000006872315,8.434913e-7,0.000012129253,0.00034915097,0.000051878942,0.000012916215,0.9982988,0.0002661132,0.0009577102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050477156,0.0000035500657,0.00008490891,0.000019342013,0.0000017120055,0.000017774451,0.0003180823,0.0001972791,0.000036955895,0.9918447,0.0074674645,0.000003123891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003762081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021752042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00872686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041497382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029342084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030108571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155781237","doi":"10.1080/09608780902763634","title":"‘Hume’ and ‘The Blackwell Guide to Hume's Treatise’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Hume's philosophy and hair distribution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.028218195834317936,"score_gpt":0.2970518607699641,"score_spread":0.26883366493564614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155781237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011607757,0.22604725,0.012020882,0.14735158,0.02828033,0.000081360624,0.0007941375,0.0005679787,0.58369565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04771707,0.06375792,0.008897597,0.05937719,0.022913478,0.0002939967,0.0005718407,0.0012782052,0.79519266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754983,0.001306655,0.00011684234,0.0001932204,0.0006223061,0.00021109548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982358,0.0010139851,0.00015013099,0.00015971885,0.00031879902,0.000121500496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020082423,0.0011337046,0.00088824535,0.00325285,0.0029911334,0.0053315405,0.0014837387,0.004989814,0.03259143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052836845,0.0006221715,0.00049977127,0.0036624153,0.008513151,0.006107954,0.0021235633,0.0062686456,0.014241921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001911295,0.00001949135,0.00007143639,0.00015565318,0.000007646182,0.000044811957,0.0014276172,0.00006794824,0.000070805,0.2866239,0.6836327,0.027858932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004629275,0.0000057754123,0.00017976773,0.00018830696,0.000002005083,0.00004679715,0.00026839832,0.00003381381,0.000057773494,0.03897669,0.9602264,0.00000966438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012755056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03242822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03259143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00326833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029438469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109029174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158220885","doi":"10.1080/09608780802548440","title":"Malebranche's Method: Knowledge and Evidence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Cartesianism; Psychologism; Epistemology; CLARITY; Doctrine; Platonism; Direct and indirect realism; Theology; Perception; Chemistry","score_opus":0.11285033369103256,"score_gpt":0.2921261545991854,"score_spread":0.17927582090815283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158220885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010764791,0.06988796,0.038271103,0.24304602,0.007071734,0.00023855414,0.0013347943,0.00033911655,0.62904596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6615131,0.06687051,0.037201487,0.074727185,0.0067271604,0.0008585145,0.0011978721,0.0006744305,0.15022975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98641646,0.0062955804,0.0005649948,0.002027249,0.0042360793,0.00045959823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90475094,0.07305193,0.002682968,0.009391792,0.009083924,0.0010383931],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017882926,0.0007597972,0.000693501,0.005200191,0.0031200545,0.0051689567,0.003907638,0.006082262,0.05293753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10265396,0.00055358454,0.00051629933,0.0034640473,0.016701274,0.016820861,0.0037921185,0.005438481,0.008729815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029995112,0.000058030062,0.0013221621,0.00066406763,0.00006191854,0.00031091738,0.0038408355,0.00010723243,0.00013727932,0.7185391,0.15417223,0.12048628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007572591,0.000055816876,0.0025235908,0.0027069363,0.00003722165,0.00045861964,0.0018339677,0.0005333182,0.001005544,0.30635154,0.6843604,0.00005728043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008158263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076533086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99687994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003810412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033556728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17709368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332652228","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2014.946470","title":"The Philosophy of Praxis: Marx, Lukács, and the Frankfurt School","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.026405762701099664,"score_gpt":0.2739537506377253,"score_spread":0.24754798793662564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332652228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0631499,0.24060363,0.0047504078,0.3348678,0.0020990258,0.00002885979,0.000074829324,0.00006168503,0.3543639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9374437,0.017066361,0.0010395641,0.0059420727,0.0008688463,0.000038326343,0.0000150151955,0.000042439657,0.03754367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975453,0.0016360129,0.000059747912,0.0001925325,0.00026155915,0.00030479615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996496,0.002750457,0.00024601395,0.00014434251,0.00017299542,0.00019024489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034093491,0.00048635228,0.000558821,0.0018357814,0.0076285666,0.009169549,0.00072620925,0.004886999,0.0047022244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066280393,0.00035107892,0.00023013756,0.0022276847,0.040386908,0.01076369,0.003063555,0.0051291278,0.00052478013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016644715,0.000009720062,0.00007436148,0.000023253217,0.0000014414826,0.000025365693,0.0062535224,0.000052237578,0.000016077965,0.98537225,0.0047721863,0.0033828814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022497932,0.000011065989,0.00036687608,0.00031236032,0.000004782728,0.000068510235,0.0074994476,0.00015029844,0.000069927606,0.8663134,0.12516633,0.000014524593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024241757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031761937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024241757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013660871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008061213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09911704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337735366","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2016.1154007","title":"Materialism in the mainstream of early German philosophy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft","keywords":"Materialism; Mainstream; German; Philosophy; German philosophy; Epistemology; Theology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06148565831719774,"score_gpt":0.24108695420927098,"score_spread":0.17960129589207324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337735366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31975424,0.05487073,0.009039495,0.04257832,0.00070629,0.000036372454,0.00016436909,0.00011447826,0.57273567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865231,0.0029051765,0.0003539872,0.00089161046,0.00014317676,0.000009224437,0.0000106390335,0.000017609285,0.009145581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816424,0.00094836747,0.000060909566,0.00015318286,0.00031709488,0.00035620024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992434,0.0004734901,0.000083962506,0.000055189605,0.00008139959,0.00006260336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029847554,0.00030543742,0.00024888915,0.0019249731,0.0036431192,0.006092224,0.00038252067,0.0014089657,0.0019762237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001901651,0.00024435276,0.00019523935,0.0013379673,0.024822364,0.0037744215,0.0017791798,0.0018646546,0.00022150888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018629593,0.00000686035,0.00016932415,0.000031691063,0.0000031152508,0.000076044365,0.017016781,0.000106118714,0.00015607323,0.9772798,0.0010747042,0.0040608393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005260858,0.00007002222,0.0045790416,0.00037764615,0.000021044245,0.00022346314,0.016781377,0.00060178374,0.001071987,0.57756317,0.3986242,0.000033570097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011991985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011510113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014966334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014966334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031524685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108588815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467690823","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2016.1177483","title":"Ross’s place in the history of analytic philosophy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Philosophy; Analytic philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Contemporary philosophy","score_opus":0.054768886353215834,"score_gpt":0.2834945838184412,"score_spread":0.2287256974652254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467690823","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018919084,0.16926782,0.04661313,0.4195576,0.0052821757,0.000038707592,0.00010198286,0.00013567269,0.34008378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7656368,0.06468084,0.03355587,0.034544222,0.007470699,0.00021337693,0.00008952958,0.0003504857,0.09345816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915776,0.00578098,0.0002821952,0.00084616296,0.001263009,0.00025003063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98676527,0.010264129,0.0005649192,0.0009203361,0.0009842805,0.0005011852],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007462441,0.00045589876,0.00054891827,0.0020168908,0.0030487638,0.006145701,0.0007309532,0.0037653549,0.0022891436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012906347,0.00039519204,0.00036230483,0.0014265915,0.02407843,0.0092015285,0.0028918323,0.006461647,0.0006812912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011378484,0.0000040797904,0.00006960973,0.00003989208,0.0000026783234,0.000025142781,0.0022507485,0.00007001198,0.000070429654,0.9798252,0.008550841,0.009079997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000774365,0.000011630716,0.0001766635,0.000189218,0.0000035363762,0.000090920104,0.0006027742,0.00031521334,0.00015070217,0.7541088,0.2443276,0.00001532693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036656098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035907403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062129903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004105556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045078635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584133136","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2016.1266461","title":"Donald C. Williams’s defence of real metaphysics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; University of Manchester; Arts and Humanities Research Council; British Academy; Princeton University","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Key (lock); History; Computer science","score_opus":0.06861166619446298,"score_gpt":0.3166726351151308,"score_spread":0.2480609689206678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584133136","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01235047,0.043229472,0.031197371,0.44721174,0.008598824,0.00005699729,0.00013936605,0.00012976723,0.45708603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6614706,0.026481513,0.013714017,0.1359036,0.009751727,0.00033705746,0.000090989146,0.00042101153,0.15182947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952957,0.0021815118,0.00016444568,0.0008065389,0.0012203068,0.00033144798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553645,0.002981856,0.00030167965,0.00034532833,0.00062507065,0.00020958789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051320903,0.00067391107,0.00067209656,0.00182708,0.0039729737,0.00594379,0.0014241298,0.007415365,0.0039818217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011837849,0.0005025355,0.0005534421,0.0012971194,0.032783512,0.0064173425,0.003409994,0.0109127555,0.0014791496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055764895,0.0000021528747,0.000022545468,0.000013814652,0.000002215354,0.000022555532,0.00058444537,0.000046596448,0.000047105896,0.9890639,0.008194221,0.0019949495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010393299,0.00001034157,0.00012360672,0.00013278719,0.000004734571,0.00009632195,0.00028315652,0.00019484547,0.00022452814,0.7061051,0.2927955,0.000018649564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007837191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070591616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007837191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075437315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036786995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054733813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618733512","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2017.1322038","title":"Consciousness, ideas of ideas and animation in Spinoza’s<i>Ethics</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Consciousness; Epistemology; Philosophy; Meaning (existential); Illusion; Object (grammar); Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09110031731990202,"score_gpt":0.2892774388847627,"score_spread":0.19817712156486067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618733512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04904777,0.013313836,0.08537873,0.106552005,0.0013124206,0.000058166068,0.000057604866,0.00013034155,0.74414915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9576655,0.0017206891,0.008871763,0.0058951485,0.00042167143,0.00010263339,0.000018166145,0.00007030284,0.025234042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740475,0.0017316185,0.000078450255,0.000196479,0.00033082796,0.00025784102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839216,0.0009574938,0.00018312382,0.00013791205,0.0001649458,0.00016423647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025978421,0.00038417673,0.00022561973,0.0009125911,0.0044184644,0.006382421,0.00058803067,0.0027381931,0.0023047775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031282487,0.00020894028,0.00035291622,0.0006887318,0.033389732,0.0055795815,0.002603475,0.0043096226,0.00040788972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022723686,0.0000018027109,0.000040827363,0.00000514792,4.3944456e-7,0.000010100693,0.0014395134,0.000030493913,0.000020379144,0.9969056,0.0007185122,0.0008249226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059345007,0.00000796406,0.00023811433,0.000048282574,0.0000027708625,0.000065670305,0.0016357306,0.00035739227,0.00015373259,0.9118404,0.08563543,0.000008544842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00562797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044486476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006382421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004872617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026619427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03535348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908726607","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2018.1537256","title":"Patriarchal power as unjust: tyranny in seventeenth-century Venice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Power (physics); Politics; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Philosophy; Political philosophy; Moral philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.052257008643323284,"score_gpt":0.25521112989357064,"score_spread":0.20295412125024737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908726607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36915454,0.014771687,0.0018303443,0.02515807,0.00041422845,0.000026942753,0.00002043798,0.000024128147,0.5885996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98322487,0.0007777039,0.00011257127,0.00074809167,0.000074479045,0.000009660449,0.000004258833,0.000009754834,0.015038669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979582,0.0010345614,0.00004543695,0.00014625938,0.0002001204,0.0006154967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991228,0.00041484658,0.000117186726,0.00007928373,0.00007429197,0.00019158461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003656148,0.00024993977,0.00035591162,0.0009838018,0.008158602,0.005572968,0.00056214404,0.0020974062,0.002168993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029184378,0.0002559293,0.00019826207,0.00057460595,0.05196305,0.0023877295,0.005602899,0.0039138603,0.00023842484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039343133,0.00001829151,0.0014929909,0.000029998348,0.000003782879,0.00034100088,0.16818686,0.000101353675,0.00015664482,0.82081395,0.0011177688,0.0076980223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000857223,0.00020946069,0.014697089,0.0009831757,0.000017793056,0.0011929391,0.108446814,0.00030828893,0.0012672766,0.30855435,0.56415015,0.00008691013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009604893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017504776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009604893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064463066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00290705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046771407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954972732","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2019.1629387","title":"Kant and the science of logic","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Virtue","score_opus":0.04823795495855564,"score_gpt":0.22843106585346404,"score_spread":0.18019311089490841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954972732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02416756,0.09716392,0.030543346,0.17485537,0.0026514095,0.000047861875,0.0002534635,0.00023132897,0.6700858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82032514,0.018441109,0.015528871,0.02407699,0.003101088,0.00011944198,0.00012084669,0.00016907687,0.11811738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970348,0.0018709293,0.00008260057,0.00029013384,0.0005056526,0.00021598494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977894,0.0014576202,0.00011850678,0.0001993118,0.00031190415,0.00012327105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023845534,0.0004863548,0.0005335146,0.0017857186,0.0031465327,0.0057415753,0.00047260185,0.002696025,0.0050364863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005184976,0.0003471755,0.00051387737,0.0010461978,0.019404199,0.0068675466,0.002062553,0.0047712037,0.0015878577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013172781,0.000005570875,0.000040510335,0.000017630138,0.00000384699,0.00001312702,0.0003253423,0.00020476387,0.00003655039,0.9917802,0.0051160417,0.0024432098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055039272,0.000005462919,0.0000646834,0.000032509444,0.0000020359853,0.000018080293,0.00013091564,0.00022290791,0.000057931138,0.9663073,0.033146713,0.000006040093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003460426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035229798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005903324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005903324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003324538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04283178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001579879","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2019.1664980","title":"Kant’s lectures on metaphysics: a critical guide","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Relation (database); Computer science","score_opus":0.1114586155937869,"score_gpt":0.2807317843998352,"score_spread":0.1692731688060483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001579879","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014378323,0.3776259,0.05311589,0.24254555,0.010311518,0.00015242986,0.000840575,0.00028706502,0.31368318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19230472,0.3793654,0.0925391,0.084144376,0.027831664,0.0010960307,0.0013604959,0.0010852633,0.22027291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965412,0.0020354656,0.00017944018,0.00023004698,0.00082910917,0.0001848164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950566,0.0039059538,0.00016041572,0.00020545677,0.00051115546,0.00016047416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004324717,0.001662784,0.0008520716,0.0045204316,0.0027880177,0.0059935106,0.0017190686,0.004994968,0.009992675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067023993,0.0008735978,0.0006386793,0.0038846056,0.017896162,0.009507475,0.0024064998,0.012021913,0.004592924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012083567,0.000017212285,0.000044252025,0.00017511634,0.000007794405,0.000055057728,0.0017384464,0.0004071895,0.00010390122,0.8386964,0.1432649,0.015477683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005219389,0.000004999053,0.00010195584,0.000409279,0.0000022329277,0.000060396003,0.00039902897,0.00017116028,0.0000779041,0.4584731,0.54028213,0.000012686389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055340123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006086123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009992675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073731365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047796294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053496122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135155537","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2021.1881881","title":"Is this me?A story about personal identity from the <i>Mahāprajñāpāramitopadeśa</i> / <i>Dà zhìdù lùn</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Indian and Buddhist Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Buddhism; Philosophy; Sanskrit; Personal identity; Literature; Identity (music); Framing (construction); Epistemology; Aesthetics; History; Self; Theology; Art","score_opus":0.05201970458598405,"score_gpt":0.23580911850253733,"score_spread":0.1837894139165533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135155537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6499077,0.009029194,0.0029218327,0.09180393,0.0026535555,0.00011239853,0.00042220717,0.00008479797,0.24306439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96749306,0.0022025222,0.00057562627,0.0039806664,0.00041515526,0.00004547245,0.000075967415,0.000047543952,0.02516386],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878126,0.0008389936,0.00002046041,0.00008055444,0.00014431812,0.0001343685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991726,0.000510304,0.000060948194,0.000034247027,0.00005429257,0.00016745536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012054123,0.0006924351,0.00040881246,0.00056771,0.015200208,0.005223859,0.00083559885,0.0021112212,0.0028576073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024954835,0.00031122944,0.00024167827,0.00092985394,0.015041563,0.0056022,0.0034158034,0.0075778,0.00049672957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042084346,0.000016159578,0.0003816253,0.00006317807,0.0000036440258,0.0014769967,0.9466993,0.000030079424,0.00029540918,0.040112477,0.007827418,0.0030515017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000087281,0.00007576582,0.0022569515,0.00019987485,0.00001199996,0.0017118315,0.75927204,0.00011717182,0.0007905467,0.0067000464,0.22882356,0.000031535703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01167665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019953461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015200208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003615943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012075584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02623564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229017849","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2022.2060181","title":"On the significance of A. A. Robb’s philosophy of time, especially in relation to Bertrand Russell’s","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Relation (database); Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Theory of relativity; Minkowski space; Theoretical physics; Physics; Mathematical physics; Computer science","score_opus":0.047906312784820645,"score_gpt":0.21856027322571867,"score_spread":0.17065396044089803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229017849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030111378,0.17261277,0.052152425,0.2896792,0.006492909,0.0000262229,0.00008628312,0.00014344478,0.4486953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8790661,0.04381706,0.011835246,0.019565484,0.004206091,0.00006092208,0.00004725821,0.00023982974,0.041162044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969381,0.0019507474,0.000058894835,0.00029128222,0.0005661914,0.000194728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961004,0.0029041686,0.00024219979,0.000139042,0.00038766142,0.00022644353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048729014,0.0004223647,0.0006232576,0.0016422996,0.0056896554,0.005525511,0.0008637243,0.0032205058,0.002087837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006343206,0.00030195317,0.0004054563,0.0020901503,0.02799848,0.00723673,0.0022504635,0.0049028066,0.0005902442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008607438,0.000002482903,0.00004233329,0.000026069098,0.0000018414223,0.000046912202,0.0019161841,0.00008229517,0.000049409253,0.9903972,0.0043744417,0.0030522237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000534325,0.000011784553,0.00028527356,0.0001295003,0.000004423977,0.00013977425,0.0012585556,0.00025607896,0.00011567002,0.8142689,0.18350373,0.000020915899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010124867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00853626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010124867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049993806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026335607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03627324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233462544","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2002.10383085","title":"Book reviews","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.14443855001809397,"score_gpt":0.32209335206191975,"score_spread":0.17765480204382578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233462544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040939706,0.1877465,0.0016622173,0.020953935,0.031929035,0.00020592101,0.0043381182,0.00091678125,0.7518381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025038465,0.10227211,0.0015721358,0.009824649,0.008706249,0.00014883667,0.004460155,0.00064135913,0.86987066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985258,0.00016810483,0.000103548016,0.00028077883,0.0007915906,0.00013022794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796754,0.00038834286,0.00011875616,0.0001898815,0.001015982,0.00031945188],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007897741,0.0010665446,0.001343497,0.003447306,0.0014923497,0.0076379115,0.0026459214,0.00281752,0.48765177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004649859,0.00048851187,0.0008905546,0.0045769266,0.00079951965,0.0045529143,0.0027412535,0.0027008345,0.45184782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001212881,0.000015576137,0.000040663854,0.0005519604,0.000004803389,0.000066912224,0.000076614495,0.000035469064,0.000104084866,0.003996453,0.8875208,0.10757457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016811289,0.000002694259,0.00004488073,0.00021603834,0.0000015088926,0.00006777809,0.000031146436,0.0000050538033,0.000013462061,0.00055870396,0.99905473,0.0000022577876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037126918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005933867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48765177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022684075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004202497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73080254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288698319","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2022.2098689","title":"The ontology of images in Plato’s<i>Timaeus</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Ontology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Property (philosophy); Receptacle; Simple (philosophy); Linguistics","score_opus":0.04421202312164213,"score_gpt":0.2289103170119781,"score_spread":0.18469829389033596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288698319","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039388783,0.0036341904,0.053692825,0.016154837,0.00063797046,0.000041612544,0.00018886208,0.00012352894,0.8861375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454304,0.001113937,0.009744656,0.0015752919,0.00036378964,0.00010218931,0.00007357893,0.0001142185,0.041481942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918395,0.00036260983,0.000028303293,0.00012041726,0.00016567548,0.00013903178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961805,0.00015602593,0.000052735217,0.000063874584,0.000042777734,0.00006642108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008784918,0.0003517356,0.00021534575,0.0007534587,0.0036117875,0.0049320026,0.00050683226,0.0014046102,0.004246766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012399247,0.00022910182,0.00036464966,0.0008350421,0.023231324,0.0069339876,0.002016146,0.0025652326,0.00063101633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035094895,0.0000012079355,0.000022156368,0.0000047777285,2.8074885e-7,0.000009240535,0.0014987073,0.000026639846,0.000034517027,0.9967529,0.0006251404,0.0010209248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000662788,0.000009694593,0.0002761468,0.0000325424,0.0000023251052,0.00005184747,0.0014516922,0.00041288455,0.00014983288,0.91550064,0.0820975,0.000008217351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005575149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005102473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005575149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004247359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016496221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030816853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311237460","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2022.2142197","title":"Cartesian intuition","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Certainty; Philosophy; Perception; Psychology","score_opus":0.06712002824523436,"score_gpt":0.220494746916762,"score_spread":0.15337471867152763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311237460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012772971,0.0026963165,0.08005129,0.0053281067,0.0005921535,0.000039411992,0.00029182294,0.000284149,0.8979438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86390275,0.0030247804,0.045972854,0.002862842,0.00075615797,0.00011360638,0.0005689156,0.00023133679,0.08256672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859387,0.00046831966,0.00008930309,0.0003276443,0.00038050557,0.0001404506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889565,0.00037024877,0.00007807783,0.0002415586,0.00034082966,0.00007364354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001491491,0.00044853915,0.0004519086,0.0010896594,0.0019035436,0.0033823154,0.00050106033,0.0010426403,0.01121719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002931029,0.00026802375,0.0006385856,0.0006684424,0.007960402,0.0047091073,0.0028272804,0.0020947242,0.0028362859],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025496279,0.0000011569136,0.00003247358,0.000008503908,8.259704e-7,0.000009520019,0.00023313225,0.000040587987,0.000022275472,0.99717855,0.0010981674,0.0013722538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005222704,0.000010460864,0.00015111105,0.000028974691,0.0000030028557,0.00012976953,0.00019008238,0.00032058178,0.00008476295,0.90660036,0.09246921,0.000006479015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018335755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013487873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01121719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018509403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095117034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037525177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366524411","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2023.2178732","title":"The historical history of philosophy: a discussion with Michael Frede <b>The historiography of philosophy</b> , by Michael Frede, with a postface by Jonathan Barnes, edited by Katerina Ierodiakonou, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022, 256 pp., £55.00, (hb), ISBN: 9780198840725","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Philosophy; Michael reaction; Classics; Theology; History; Chemistry; Organic chemistry","score_opus":0.019124561226420186,"score_gpt":0.18883822464027372,"score_spread":0.16971366341385352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366524411","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013627241,0.44149676,0.0006111239,0.50126094,0.008363672,0.000008491105,0.00003495502,0.000017436749,0.04684387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07996838,0.5489396,0.0029741204,0.14313912,0.025897453,0.00009153359,0.000074917014,0.00013950073,0.19877537],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998911,0.00054335356,0.000031397158,0.00014422694,0.00024251401,0.00012738656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992112,0.0004617428,0.00007055583,0.000022340191,0.000109501714,0.00012470821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002402148,0.000551851,0.00057198043,0.0013318241,0.0058924453,0.006775178,0.00091821415,0.0045669074,0.008515735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028032146,0.0005125121,0.00034667162,0.0031456158,0.007978063,0.009274399,0.0025931504,0.0056003463,0.0021777258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017685568,0.000014419859,0.00019521246,0.0002092144,0.0000063195052,0.0001946011,0.009052555,0.00006352597,0.000081380844,0.12007527,0.83662915,0.033460613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018146325,0.0000040860705,0.00019272776,0.00035230734,0.0000011259339,0.0001519171,0.0019455015,0.000018464294,0.000030317224,0.008694828,0.9886021,0.0000049027512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023222843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03864236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023222843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00779754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003986261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056575358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372287184","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2023.2201615","title":"Varieties of consciousness in classical Arabic thought: Avicenna, Averroes, and the <i>mutakallimūn</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Medieval and Classical Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.044401909531545714,"score_gpt":0.23280495053728342,"score_spread":0.1884030410057377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372287184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39766037,0.12517732,0.0058970926,0.0845919,0.0018617437,0.000035944326,0.000051864034,0.00003707609,0.3846867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874817,0.0057170237,0.00076708937,0.001874623,0.00034528674,0.000015947193,0.000007994227,0.000010075384,0.0037802684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995278,0.0002695399,0.0000125399865,0.000048920254,0.000078244455,0.00006289158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993839,0.0003491472,0.0000766189,0.000030487272,0.000097621254,0.000062220905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010325452,0.0003331625,0.00022874886,0.0010923264,0.0042106747,0.0045288657,0.00041656874,0.0013410955,0.0013077048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014019555,0.00014867054,0.00018645496,0.0011215268,0.018545011,0.004496262,0.0017986072,0.0023605712,0.00017352992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008231125,0.000030838033,0.0009506717,0.0000790399,0.0000054251755,0.00024291084,0.10287692,0.00010057238,0.00028714305,0.87590903,0.004699504,0.014735693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043122163,0.000069913185,0.00788959,0.00067745935,0.000018405262,0.00069774676,0.09149419,0.0009540024,0.0005755772,0.7083831,0.18914098,0.00005593156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069257407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064307926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069257407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038250815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014831659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027753055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386602190","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2023.2239022","title":"An inconsistency in Cassirer’s conception of the a priori","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07423693053374412,"score_gpt":0.2586299337892665,"score_spread":0.18439300325552238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386602190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076828995,0.0153171485,0.11804917,0.33174488,0.009939856,0.00006360733,0.0004134158,0.00037464197,0.5164144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65451586,0.0131974835,0.092963964,0.1333651,0.013166556,0.00053964707,0.00032398794,0.0008902309,0.09103721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905543,0.0047978475,0.00062874734,0.0016149085,0.002029687,0.0003744806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867556,0.008966215,0.0004237087,0.0013344721,0.0022239326,0.00029601663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01387606,0.0008188136,0.0011727961,0.0020888527,0.0044014105,0.007049208,0.0027845744,0.00583052,0.006302456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025021344,0.0006863369,0.0009987578,0.0014969405,0.023848072,0.009197664,0.0033868577,0.012586075,0.002573507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009193954,0.000002249726,0.00002642976,0.000029226243,0.0000045106162,0.000014925069,0.00076892256,0.000049581326,0.00003166823,0.9881513,0.009166391,0.0017456389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016029264,0.000013367927,0.00012640475,0.0001581187,0.000010841216,0.000113238806,0.00042248788,0.0004301673,0.00015164434,0.86889654,0.12963204,0.000029209043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050530722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055376277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01387606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053091194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029552279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07338452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392927328","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2307336","title":"Reorienting Clifford’s evidentialism: returning to social trust","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11515375989045752,"score_gpt":0.2998163492941909,"score_spread":0.18466258940373337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392927328","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061776903,0.012121827,0.1984451,0.4051349,0.0025367418,0.00009469168,0.00008524816,0.0001063952,0.31969827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962811,0.0018461073,0.015057851,0.00901805,0.000913124,0.00007354735,0.000017527165,0.000095246345,0.010167525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846624,0.010270603,0.0005812885,0.0012123287,0.0024086663,0.00086468545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736649,0.01894509,0.0014661489,0.0025526115,0.0027427252,0.00062847737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018647902,0.00052103354,0.00087140844,0.0019829113,0.005126525,0.011568041,0.0025846434,0.0069375806,0.0026061013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035281043,0.00050866,0.0008253433,0.0015553329,0.05708604,0.02069571,0.006508431,0.011455793,0.00048017383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035358519,0.0000035920064,0.0000399349,0.000012625909,0.0000019673264,0.00004188352,0.003429969,0.00008173591,0.000018473875,0.99402964,0.0007851738,0.0015515803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043576483,0.0000033020742,0.000043876422,0.000039662867,0.0000022333788,0.000022923758,0.0008849578,0.000370741,0.00005521231,0.9872028,0.01136362,0.000006365934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009344296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006929162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018647902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010340067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048729638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09862065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401615859","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2389869","title":"Du Châtelet's causal idealism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Rationalism; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Natural (archaeology); Chemistry","score_opus":0.05660890936950277,"score_gpt":0.23375143077835076,"score_spread":0.17714252140884798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401615859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024870468,0.00468904,0.118709,0.04240959,0.0008051748,0.000060126065,0.0001915928,0.00020494229,0.80806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9293817,0.0021747032,0.021996427,0.0036439109,0.000514113,0.00015667162,0.0000826226,0.00009915374,0.04195064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969363,0.0010203195,0.00009650876,0.0006047537,0.0010324717,0.00030954243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964006,0.0022550165,0.00018993625,0.0004230344,0.00054685003,0.00018455063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032660954,0.00042274702,0.00052048947,0.0016371179,0.0029905704,0.0042524156,0.0010384846,0.0028383364,0.0047633327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006602651,0.00030704384,0.0009054879,0.00093560736,0.015821451,0.005238377,0.0029306458,0.0039435257,0.00064718357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016413336,0.000001318758,0.000016023607,0.0000040424748,7.652422e-7,0.000007866493,0.0001084602,0.00008220843,0.0000125092965,0.9989079,0.00045027887,0.00040695368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006300103,0.0000033732153,0.000056157238,0.000018242614,0.0000033330293,0.00003554509,0.0000750911,0.00081330864,0.00011256696,0.97404295,0.024827983,0.000005198296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063221366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046663187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065485523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065485523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035820736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047513306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402485048","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2373128","title":"Against the extremes: Simmel’s social and economic pluralism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Oxford; McMaster University; Harvard University","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Positive economics; Economics","score_opus":0.07819909330377232,"score_gpt":0.3105184939609326,"score_spread":0.23231940065716028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402485048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09414073,0.015325506,0.024062295,0.32588848,0.001906679,0.00004708868,0.000049093716,0.00008478105,0.5384954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9632859,0.0019503114,0.004117504,0.010063178,0.0009677391,0.000049259255,0.000009946928,0.000034610093,0.019521594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636275,0.0024105469,0.000059956437,0.00039141276,0.0004995562,0.00027575254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832505,0.00095045846,0.00014633186,0.00017439063,0.00014091801,0.00026274627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005024217,0.00040122814,0.0004163857,0.0013977349,0.007710171,0.006669478,0.00060659926,0.0029108701,0.0019348024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003910416,0.00021847941,0.0004291547,0.0007766012,0.05297974,0.008456499,0.0044511277,0.0049879937,0.00028245844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005286558,0.00000555687,0.00005870403,0.000005336534,0.0000013067017,0.000027196305,0.0039000586,0.00007187206,0.000022415363,0.9917013,0.0024697285,0.0017311599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005678433,0.0000060632456,0.00006770994,0.000024237303,0.0000011965169,0.000028525996,0.0016824361,0.00019053958,0.00003698212,0.9538785,0.044074032,0.0000041425296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029221533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003640917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007710171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005145935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003014379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037336588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402801162","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2383624","title":"Physical influx theory: the case of Émilie Du Châtelet","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Humanities","score_opus":0.028887612227805483,"score_gpt":0.2777691850215041,"score_spread":0.24888157279369863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402801162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065375425,0.0052149747,0.009236895,0.021172699,0.00033761724,0.000037006957,0.000030035215,0.000044878463,0.8985505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464546,0.0011874373,0.0013238132,0.0020945098,0.00014336436,0.000057087404,0.000015042686,0.000039061208,0.048684955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813914,0.00079818716,0.000031401185,0.00032350005,0.0003476413,0.00036009346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986903,0.0007885351,0.00009122884,0.00012847096,0.00015896819,0.00014258693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025559731,0.00034393257,0.0005099475,0.0017092086,0.014950441,0.0057377093,0.0011419915,0.0041495333,0.009282245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037201846,0.0003491627,0.00045433283,0.001302036,0.023087425,0.008895369,0.0057490338,0.0047935564,0.00093794934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053404015,0.000004060284,0.00010336297,0.000008471402,0.0000011099161,0.00016628418,0.0061749755,0.000032166467,0.000030035131,0.9919601,0.00077156245,0.00074249884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003291283,0.000025724812,0.0011192582,0.00022833422,0.000017293665,0.00072256476,0.013289071,0.0008872184,0.00033664895,0.64749575,0.33581337,0.000031844585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020889008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0260719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020889008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010562568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033541545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07663715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404481090","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2423398","title":"Scudéry’s portraits: patriarchy, agency, and genre","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical and Scientific Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Portrait; Agency (philosophy); Art; Philosophy; Literature; Sociology; Art history; Gender studies; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06173355360424425,"score_gpt":0.2732408484551356,"score_spread":0.21150729485089131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404481090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12311093,0.032871384,0.009173858,0.11439152,0.002891969,0.00006108243,0.00012592101,0.00016089025,0.71721244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8767694,0.008274756,0.001922958,0.007786265,0.0016241045,0.00007123754,0.000037056125,0.00019690205,0.10331729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982803,0.0009243343,0.000038474795,0.0001898932,0.00034531287,0.00022168054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987495,0.00080050883,0.0001103827,0.00009698303,0.00009550695,0.00014715498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014331103,0.00061825686,0.00043080957,0.0018523954,0.008493632,0.0064023044,0.000719058,0.0026126178,0.003518841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041765245,0.00022212348,0.00027538594,0.0012889974,0.02850313,0.0040414003,0.0038290354,0.004820238,0.00060043077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041787953,0.0000118139205,0.00046224336,0.000072932045,0.000005223452,0.00065982033,0.2839587,0.00008890541,0.0004239001,0.6732479,0.029039413,0.011987435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066969164,0.000028098411,0.00054293755,0.00025135052,0.000005688089,0.0010269497,0.048440676,0.00015326653,0.00046477592,0.060524832,0.88854,0.000014627731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005579544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055729975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008493632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034991247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018287488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025388002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405425026","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2423396","title":"Aristotle on logical consequence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10385044286682055,"score_gpt":0.26105222523961646,"score_spread":0.15720178237279592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405425026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022545408,0.03826932,0.07619062,0.076034635,0.0022732457,0.00006493475,0.00038336188,0.00017156814,0.7840669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8779028,0.013174966,0.021624299,0.01598961,0.002924158,0.0002287691,0.00021868058,0.00015729475,0.06777934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806505,0.00086297793,0.00006819608,0.00027302428,0.0005895964,0.00014128293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869907,0.0007761673,0.000059989256,0.00015274475,0.00024570248,0.000066303975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002423368,0.00046788747,0.0007122997,0.0016777776,0.0033406995,0.00342739,0.0005926295,0.0026971868,0.0035909074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033350205,0.00030210635,0.0005797513,0.0010566189,0.014616021,0.0054326546,0.001838066,0.0038605696,0.001009861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003934353,0.0000023826537,0.000018835719,0.000009342381,0.0000015183015,0.000013773477,0.00015967924,0.0001436615,0.000021191729,0.99622726,0.0021002006,0.0012981801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004146801,0.0000036276685,0.000039987724,0.000019998315,0.0000013022817,0.000010122811,0.000039626924,0.0001847202,0.000025178799,0.9864305,0.013238145,0.0000026371395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042375247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032250276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048207184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048207184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019579327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03497696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406898838","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2024.2445605","title":"James Africanus Beale Horton’s philosophy of history: progress, race, and the fate of Africa","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Philosophy; Race (biology); Epistemology; Ancient philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04218595766613161,"score_gpt":0.26533506381053545,"score_spread":0.22314910614440384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406898838","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032619063,0.1255327,0.008417067,0.49969095,0.0053324536,0.00004915096,0.00005238923,0.000027893238,0.32827827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82637805,0.041445788,0.0059761796,0.036289006,0.002305506,0.00006819845,0.00001949403,0.00004258107,0.087475255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930406,0.00039435923,0.000018607872,0.00008433862,0.00012684136,0.00007177632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999116,0.00060023007,0.00006471332,0.000031749518,0.00009408291,0.00009320495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012465151,0.00024206984,0.00024345258,0.00094495073,0.0046704817,0.0027924043,0.00038671022,0.0018024585,0.0017134756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020765776,0.0001512753,0.0001253411,0.00079679297,0.01347796,0.0060979724,0.0016851954,0.0036159705,0.00025547293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000132743135,0.000009143877,0.00020541776,0.00004819755,0.0000021574392,0.000090599955,0.011165538,0.00011033024,0.00009970853,0.95972854,0.020106403,0.008420614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007742118,0.000013689736,0.00049490307,0.00023993847,0.0000031397726,0.00018281535,0.0047858288,0.00023199235,0.00012622784,0.44064218,0.5532582,0.000013282702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009329684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0108165415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009329684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003174864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022013695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023035407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407869643","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2455427","title":"Attribution arguments and the metaphysics of immanent actions: cognitive acts from Peter John Olivi to Durand of St. Pourçain","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; Univerzita Karlova v Praze","keywords":"Philosophy; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Attribution; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04936366166412882,"score_gpt":0.2583190484719532,"score_spread":0.20895538680782438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407869643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09575413,0.021871157,0.07312453,0.11121994,0.001999962,0.000044804154,0.00009838952,0.00022587577,0.69566125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827032,0.0016647662,0.0033450988,0.0011090136,0.00048760453,0.000022300488,0.000013460636,0.000046438996,0.010608158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972626,0.0014187508,0.00007396662,0.0003883166,0.000609177,0.00024720337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953395,0.0034793161,0.00038392216,0.00026193107,0.0003781146,0.00015710399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039596832,0.00053612125,0.00030715566,0.0013139334,0.004377215,0.0043304306,0.00091268716,0.0025733663,0.0027667116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008737555,0.0002424995,0.00034343667,0.0009263857,0.02773363,0.005492256,0.002408614,0.0038498682,0.00035107243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102575905,0.0000036878794,0.00006566501,0.000014854615,0.0000015402835,0.000045499924,0.003395738,0.000102198755,0.00004609183,0.99308795,0.0009636505,0.002262989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016588865,0.0000073420333,0.0004144192,0.00008259236,0.000005633542,0.000075406235,0.0013866539,0.00055321277,0.00023063814,0.9358479,0.061363555,0.000016000773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015547325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009434119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015547325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009504961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021981301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06896365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409347825","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2478974","title":"Monads, situation, and infinite explanation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0454345708368941,"score_gpt":0.23697599422328677,"score_spread":0.19154142338639268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409347825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1361857,0.024101283,0.17074004,0.070414156,0.0007917412,0.00006811324,0.00037148636,0.0005955518,0.5967319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98033303,0.0011219417,0.007596496,0.0009257988,0.00016592232,0.000032148826,0.000082515784,0.000056033638,0.009686026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972615,0.0015091393,0.00011445396,0.0003663812,0.00044758985,0.00030091716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973279,0.0016475545,0.00017540409,0.0004834804,0.0002073798,0.00015834655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042208657,0.00045611674,0.0006445103,0.002117599,0.0046957037,0.0057469243,0.0013582672,0.0028096468,0.0048580007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00419789,0.00043008884,0.0008847333,0.0011728298,0.036108844,0.015250613,0.004853326,0.004039386,0.00052284094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036007998,0.0000017451064,0.00005203979,0.000010533938,0.0000015770414,0.000017764642,0.0008237209,0.00008139806,0.00001729022,0.9980742,0.00021807634,0.0006981338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035956368,0.0000022662566,0.000062215775,0.000020339921,0.0000025873862,0.00002762836,0.000331263,0.00025718386,0.000042121792,0.9924509,0.006796359,0.0000035050962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051489333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054261326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075847497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075847497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026658613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05503148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410596923","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2496270","title":"W.E.B. Du Bois’ misrecognition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Theology","score_opus":0.04389203167010317,"score_gpt":0.23975084097444252,"score_spread":0.19585880930433935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410596923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06811416,0.03539461,0.035525944,0.2753085,0.0069095106,0.000043129145,0.00007786535,0.00016260479,0.5784637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8864147,0.0072946916,0.004200835,0.021619828,0.0013983499,0.000054169162,0.000038419304,0.00012815793,0.07885081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997013,0.00126904,0.000095371084,0.0005931874,0.00070827926,0.00032118932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969451,0.0018231104,0.00029885353,0.00031078278,0.0004488317,0.0001731896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023782798,0.00046865808,0.00040747016,0.0014142347,0.003988003,0.005249817,0.0008369456,0.0036333445,0.004320317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008626825,0.00025737353,0.00029772363,0.0008016931,0.020881541,0.009811239,0.004137749,0.0048024203,0.0011171636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012719009,0.000005438325,0.00021934736,0.000028612585,0.0000030976594,0.00008273533,0.012980222,0.00005982264,0.00011817916,0.9528994,0.019322474,0.014267966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007437262,0.000016383017,0.0003380698,0.00017287224,0.00000449164,0.000492824,0.0058164303,0.00028625032,0.00066518714,0.483092,0.50908446,0.000023589206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064631132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004748838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064631132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00432344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024328376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03136891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412571404","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2527980","title":"Towards a “halfway plausible theory of ethics”: judgement in Arendt’s critique of Kant’s moral philosophy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Philosophy; Epistemology; Moral philosophy; Normative ethics","score_opus":0.10595416758706072,"score_gpt":0.3569349345724565,"score_spread":0.2509807669853958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412571404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033118352,0.013209063,0.1217352,0.35299987,0.0029973593,0.00008140665,0.000095728574,0.000128987,0.47563404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9288709,0.0022801708,0.020679995,0.019145044,0.0013878946,0.0001643453,0.000046065874,0.00013785438,0.027287768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850793,0.009495745,0.0003170829,0.0009639199,0.0034573101,0.0006867716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99396306,0.0037405882,0.00038844952,0.0005980739,0.0010145385,0.00029529457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012171157,0.0006363103,0.00074824935,0.002314734,0.00621332,0.009085252,0.0022996715,0.0091306195,0.0028658446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015012492,0.00042781146,0.0010579485,0.0017652728,0.05092531,0.008918832,0.0042530377,0.0126376515,0.00074376346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004753604,0.000004130649,0.000023921359,0.000012759833,0.000002143991,0.000017989412,0.0017629524,0.00011798334,0.000025980236,0.9947455,0.0022109405,0.001070988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060765456,0.0000034237924,0.000052167008,0.000051786716,0.0000018673974,0.000021221085,0.00046167147,0.00038423893,0.00006048704,0.9822466,0.016704075,0.0000065232925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052203736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004589067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012171157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009049314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004994549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065657675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413875675","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2547655","title":"Richard FitzRalph on the will and instantaneous volition: a critical edition of book I, Question 10 from Richard FitzRalph’s <i>Lectura in Sententias</i> (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 137)","year":2025,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Medieval Philosophy and Theology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Volition (linguistics); Critical edition; Humanities; Classics; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03080547455585664,"score_gpt":0.25636944047600463,"score_spread":0.225563965920148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413875675","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031112505,0.055103727,0.0017124481,0.7069079,0.032695595,0.00004553727,0.00014739744,0.000047149213,0.20022896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16391137,0.04575902,0.0024642912,0.3779472,0.049209002,0.00025330734,0.00020370225,0.0004069019,0.3598452],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986266,0.000501354,0.00005416353,0.00018720423,0.0004973545,0.00013330094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977691,0.0013735197,0.00012833471,0.00009423381,0.00048429685,0.0001504982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017448132,0.00049609435,0.0003268294,0.0010062889,0.0035960039,0.0055010845,0.0010614238,0.0052288543,0.0060290997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009074921,0.00024684967,0.00026126354,0.00089176116,0.009735676,0.0076282346,0.00166638,0.008927182,0.0019046457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019774667,0.000010156135,0.00008422386,0.000082773906,0.0000022568897,0.00010829358,0.0065360107,0.000033946988,0.000090818015,0.23885778,0.745685,0.008488962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070397045,0.000007641221,0.00040678238,0.00027824478,0.0000020289203,0.00008889287,0.003172547,0.00002615363,0.00010663432,0.032359462,0.9635328,0.000011886783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029075176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042189647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029075176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046586995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004506589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057811856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414753228","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2551577","title":"Is Spinoza a dualist?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Dualism; Subject (documents); Relation (database); Ontology; Idiosyncrasy; Philosophy of mind","score_opus":0.07921737422259575,"score_gpt":0.27660107335320183,"score_spread":0.19738369913060608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414753228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041861057,0.006307519,0.047355756,0.1141658,0.0021359788,0.000039132803,0.00019852743,0.00022750758,0.7877088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91419286,0.0024340942,0.011095753,0.013387946,0.0010995592,0.00011669041,0.00010262755,0.00015605956,0.05741445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970381,0.00089189433,0.00010173565,0.0006920372,0.00075803243,0.000518139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982376,0.00052839395,0.00016478788,0.0003791837,0.00033307375,0.00035692524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031155888,0.0004140401,0.00086038525,0.0017647645,0.0075141788,0.012188063,0.0011998352,0.0033981754,0.010632308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033853727,0.00040611057,0.0008997516,0.0013426067,0.033970714,0.014785087,0.0059244297,0.007052116,0.0018069948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071947507,0.000003764163,0.00007604526,0.000008070351,0.0000023312227,0.000017699265,0.0006347796,0.000012274721,0.00001747332,0.996653,0.0012476281,0.0013197116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000943177,0.0000054375273,0.00012692809,0.00003297746,0.0000044073763,0.00009036466,0.0010102787,0.00018206646,0.00005941629,0.9462779,0.052193437,0.000007377138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007781354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067091873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012188063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006445244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039206273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046763718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414779733","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2560453","title":"The infinite divisibility and multiplicity of creatures: Conway’s non-absolutist theory of space","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Multiplicity (mathematics); Divisibility rule; Space (punctuation); Infinite divisibility","score_opus":0.03629113902323856,"score_gpt":0.23922591347079256,"score_spread":0.202934774447554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414779733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2018037,0.016399354,0.15534128,0.050163526,0.00074090686,0.000054175027,0.00012649954,0.00012926052,0.57524127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761051,0.0007333295,0.0076100733,0.0010959017,0.00013584146,0.000052425064,0.000021923384,0.00005108055,0.014194368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972149,0.0015115223,0.0000932534,0.0005454001,0.00039063802,0.00024428792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727076,0.0014018842,0.0003125756,0.00058430457,0.00020366682,0.00022678137],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027604024,0.0004086001,0.0005634143,0.001182861,0.0051564225,0.006868031,0.0012595424,0.0025190879,0.0026997854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045062234,0.00043026498,0.0007695481,0.00079241185,0.05562262,0.0119123105,0.007006641,0.0051754047,0.00033337696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064542955,0.000002575947,0.00006617094,0.000007946774,0.0000014457431,0.000017132666,0.002593436,0.00009922111,0.000050259943,0.99598265,0.00025714212,0.0009156133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000617804,0.0000070335877,0.0001331494,0.000022721077,0.0000026631037,0.00006283472,0.0006632863,0.0002572386,0.000109387605,0.97712505,0.021602187,0.000008332869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020694153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019688508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004588163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014761005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03328955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416307882","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2511060","title":"Blueprint for cosmopolitan philosophy: a post-Eurocentric proposal","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint","score_opus":0.05497622349358694,"score_gpt":0.32517569184304773,"score_spread":0.2701994683494608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416307882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0348624,0.005747665,0.033268638,0.36447427,0.0036069027,0.00006909585,0.00005142368,0.000066693065,0.557853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8774418,0.002914374,0.014059506,0.043921486,0.0019090323,0.00026351996,0.00004729851,0.00010245534,0.05934045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578357,0.0025511475,0.000115777366,0.00044350687,0.00061530306,0.00049078604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708706,0.0009126724,0.00025151,0.00045713547,0.00064854487,0.00064307457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007660838,0.00032969602,0.00042076327,0.001195442,0.0041482956,0.007946571,0.0013243979,0.005276439,0.0054505803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005327546,0.00024022954,0.0004469855,0.0013260072,0.030987065,0.0111016305,0.0069348407,0.009998738,0.0008394707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019832137,0.0000067304013,0.000053615884,0.000006020879,7.356789e-7,0.000016724487,0.0007252887,0.000029034783,0.000012125889,0.996947,0.0011417245,0.0010588712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130585095,0.000013243345,0.0003903017,0.00008247331,0.000001587854,0.000082335384,0.002096263,0.00032120929,0.00005494829,0.8856944,0.11124463,0.000005658901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021919706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002610114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007946571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044771363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073859943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040514886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}