{"meta":{"query_hash":"f86169ca1127","filters":{"venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f86169ca1127","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=British+Journal+of+American+Legal+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1822363874","doi":"","title":"Admissibility frameworks and scientific evidence: controversies in relation to shaken baby syndrome / abusive head trauma","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"Child Abuse and Related Trauma","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shaken baby syndrome; Verdict; Scientific evidence; Criminology; Psychology; Law; Child abuse; Political science; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Epistemology; Medical emergency; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043446220522935286,"score_gpt":0.3378366281791877,"score_spread":0.2943904076562524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1822363874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9377896,0.055314567,0.000022788232,0.0061496,0.00033324055,0.00024591474,0.0000048045376,0.000010663323,0.00012883278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958865,0.0024076216,0.00084329286,0.00052950066,0.00011360535,0.0000027385267,9.1523276e-7,0.000011455713,0.00020436636],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998347,0.00009774779,0.0005519031,0.00026388883,0.0004892456,0.00025023133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829197,0.0003384062,0.00027301587,0.00011594067,0.00062151393,0.00035917567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008341629,0.00013719026,0.00070391374,0.00021045886,0.00014202613,0.00011752876,0.000087559005,0.00008738623,0.000010196385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003520651,0.0001252994,0.00010144997,0.00058979465,0.00064239145,0.0003386831,0.00005406549,0.00085615966,0.000004472434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0055930563,0.0013905872,0.41007915,0.00035583798,0.0024706873,0.024281353,0.04266079,0.0007709576,0.0005211907,0.00012277506,0.04541094,0.46634266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027638294,0.0022580146,0.95797855,0.0062079,0.00020945366,0.012026704,0.013850583,0.000025308631,0.000029892688,0.00021259034,0.004236888,0.00020031042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057058444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046627544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54789937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025581967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018709539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5109561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592538197","doi":"10.1515/bjals-2016-0016","title":"Investor-State Dispute Settlement and the Future of the Precautionary Principle","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Sovereignty; Investment (military); International trade; Scope (computer science); Business; Uncertainty; State (computer science); European union; International economics; Economics; Public economics; Economic policy; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.008697889591839276,"score_gpt":0.2186868702454752,"score_spread":0.20998898065363591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592538197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9393823,0.009303455,0.000002713917,0.05091145,0.00016645252,0.00010831095,0.00006445873,0.0000041138605,0.000056752622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99002326,0.008775021,0.00005146861,0.00020507065,0.00035958758,0.0000033240374,6.779239e-7,4.5234063e-7,0.0005811598],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991848,0.00014215485,0.00027035055,0.000076651624,0.00021580297,0.00011026312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991643,0.00020564115,0.00040711876,0.000024459538,0.0001604349,0.000038075814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023233164,0.000070409216,0.0002047799,0.0000031421293,0.00036106977,0.000019324305,0.00017650968,0.000012566443,0.000011776019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055531378,0.000014256624,0.00012544371,0.00017811144,0.0011081867,0.00012751011,0.00012884379,0.00008471914,3.9688868e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017331356,0.00008115887,0.020084418,0.000010408696,0.00038736514,0.000013065957,0.00057091715,0.000019941155,0.0058552395,0.0031585258,0.011417487,0.9582282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025649852,0.00011946122,0.89311194,0.000112026755,0.000026751577,0.00024684347,0.001344054,5.731337e-7,0.00010578494,0.0006232156,0.10399644,0.000056399535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014097123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077037705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9581718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023798855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008842492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40831602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594795538","doi":"10.1515/bjals-2016-0019","title":"The Two Noble Kinsmen: Internal and Legal Transparency in the WTO and Their Connection to Preferential and Regional Trade Agreements","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); International trade; Negotiation; International trade law; International economics; Declaration; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.023101931491536002,"score_gpt":0.2989851440975537,"score_spread":0.2758832126060177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594795538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92313546,0.0030498188,0.00018459512,0.072786964,0.00018120036,0.00015669098,0.000008062961,0.0000066316793,0.00049059803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901043,0.009004731,0.000052062656,0.0004404222,0.00026080033,0.000004570654,1.3552891e-7,0.0000065521626,0.0001263979],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880135,0.0002872153,0.0002897068,0.00013674448,0.00028842984,0.00019655559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993073,0.0003143306,0.00018235038,0.000041426523,0.000073070725,0.0000815591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005538001,0.00009539154,0.00020648298,0.000046362977,0.0006126988,0.0002551835,0.00016940266,0.0000133409885,0.0000074878035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015867238,0.000053471795,0.000030234258,0.00019929944,0.0010686745,0.00035606857,0.00003415392,0.0001360429,2.499687e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053349417,0.00030381637,0.08587187,0.00002740335,0.0007320885,0.00022717104,0.07119624,0.0000065788636,0.0018108069,0.04626448,0.016173648,0.7768524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022966657,0.000744889,0.5852461,0.0004924833,0.00006527134,0.001281881,0.07437529,0.0000018896827,0.00015937112,0.0009381538,0.33410737,0.00029064072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027329335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032413524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77656174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055526885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041309388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9852424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807483693","doi":"10.2478/bjals-2018-0006","title":"Acts of State, State Immunity, and Judicial Review in the United States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Doctrine; Political science; Sovereign immunity; Alien Tort Statute; Statute; State immunity; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; State (computer science); Constitution; Common law; Qualified immunity; Tort; Liability","score_opus":0.028300283738999107,"score_gpt":0.3533581357669763,"score_spread":0.32505785202797716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807483693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826618,0.011476974,0.000004572808,0.002101424,0.00012236871,0.00010517117,0.000017518027,0.000003595636,0.0035065738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9029301,0.09552337,0.000057921614,0.0010752687,0.00016261189,0.0000013671325,0.0000012921516,0.0000042050074,0.00024385333],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998463,0.00043962625,0.00041052952,0.00006533094,0.0004493484,0.0001722142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830484,0.0002723675,0.00047634638,0.000043899825,0.00086279813,0.000039746745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013868142,0.000068727735,0.00032679152,0.00008946384,0.00037259594,0.000069298876,0.00026751656,0.000008418974,0.000022703278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035848975,0.00005248078,0.00005072148,0.00025803316,0.002272639,0.00021034999,0.00004737335,0.00019122523,0.0000013186715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009488319,0.0015651708,0.010709001,0.0009791399,0.0029125041,0.0026241306,0.38597706,0.00004574385,0.0001030084,0.31169608,0.112609506,0.16982983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012327981,0.0023329433,0.11934463,0.0074391803,0.00016094033,0.00043263866,0.035673335,0.000004126638,0.000091600945,0.07173365,0.7610906,0.00046356343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033102673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031332027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6484811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004825813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001035052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9863436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883228411","doi":"10.2478/bjals-2019-0014","title":"“Felix Cohen Was the Blackstone of Federal Indian Law:” Taking the Comparison Seriously","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jurisprudence; Law; Scholarship; Politics; Legal history; Civil servant; Legal education; Common law; Political science; Servant; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.025935630180175015,"score_gpt":0.3256007071614473,"score_spread":0.29966507698127226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883228411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93168354,0.01754178,0.000009520678,0.010731233,0.00068767456,0.0002227947,0.000010657752,0.000012958097,0.039099827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950986,0.0031649466,0.000063302134,0.0009205566,0.0005743175,0.000003907586,2.8368515e-7,0.000006692841,0.00016737508],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980273,0.00029494375,0.00050949043,0.00011823127,0.0007394037,0.00031062213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979018,0.00040640577,0.0009872006,0.00008011321,0.00056605134,0.00005840378],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009555947,0.00011851769,0.00057077256,0.000029366454,0.0017938827,0.00016313279,0.00046130645,0.000025070238,0.000044840745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000413258,0.00007901813,0.00019507272,0.0003490733,0.00494963,0.00023253067,0.00013488988,0.00036090898,0.0000111538175],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052054494,0.00065448025,0.22641833,0.00007509951,0.005711377,0.00052487786,0.20702377,0.00071902573,0.0003288626,0.25124,0.04373472,0.26304892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086354883,0.0007146117,0.24462165,0.00062830356,0.00019698264,0.0003660611,0.5000615,0.000003754871,0.00006873897,0.0035211777,0.2485511,0.0004025584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11280081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050238788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29303774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001103613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019702985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387976370","doi":"10.2478/bjals-2023-0011","title":"Magical Thinking and Appearance-based Recusal","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Precept; Jurisprudence; Law; Obligation; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Moral obligation; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03865647748839743,"score_gpt":0.3557058915749545,"score_spread":0.31704941408655707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387976370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96416074,0.0072922735,0.00019367636,0.021907648,0.00022430712,0.000117119394,0.000009008535,0.0000807573,0.006014492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99018717,0.007878878,0.00090609124,0.00034166916,0.00043152669,0.0000044518865,2.633726e-7,0.000007744457,0.00024220449],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988882,0.000113279726,0.00024774048,0.000114103015,0.00039901005,0.0002376554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927825,0.00014671049,0.00021872476,0.000044742217,0.00020325267,0.000108340864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080345763,0.00006535816,0.00024917492,0.00005541913,0.0007645487,0.00018417624,0.00017766979,0.000019120745,0.000007898057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041205884,0.00006615953,0.000076507895,0.00052733277,0.0010198599,0.00017766943,0.000058178317,0.00021830636,0.000009642723],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000122003206,0.00022060567,0.048557002,0.00007117385,0.00046703307,0.0015455118,0.0191401,0.0002484269,0.00021977944,0.04019329,0.047328405,0.84188664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008828584,0.00033516236,0.23153406,0.00067158294,0.00007889504,0.00022606492,0.065295,0.000041000487,0.00004382513,0.004090954,0.696415,0.00038556365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022692932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060409796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8415011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053844557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011513572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5880368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}