{"meta":{"query_hash":"f86169ca1127","filters":{"venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f86169ca1127","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=British+Journal+of+American+Legal+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1822363874","doi":"","title":"Admissibility frameworks and scientific evidence: controversies in relation to shaken baby syndrome / abusive head trauma","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"Child Abuse and Related Trauma","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shaken baby syndrome; Verdict; Scientific evidence; Criminology; Psychology; Law; Child abuse; Political science; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Epistemology; Medical emergency; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043446220522935286,"score_gpt":0.3378366281791877,"score_spread":0.2943904076562524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1822363874","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053028893,0.118765146,0.010222771,0.827234,0.0035428351,0.000050768132,0.00004729583,0.000022612123,0.03481165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4500109,0.09925074,0.027004063,0.38969892,0.029015174,0.00049178425,0.00012457518,0.00007596906,0.0043279966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.85235953,0.096306175,0.013788227,0.008458154,0.025238834,0.0038490838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.50851256,0.4566484,0.012762919,0.0051477663,0.014079123,0.002849261],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18230692,0.00077494263,0.0025458934,0.012609166,0.013598994,0.022494338,0.008030973,0.046953764,0.0027412067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3291189,0.0013206191,0.0021571694,0.008975663,0.10198237,0.026534986,0.013537503,0.040580966,0.0004497536],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022243938,0.000020141695,0.00035634826,0.00034246023,0.000026282578,0.0006336454,0.003956645,0.0001901104,0.00005497573,0.96928495,0.008480768,0.016631454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030444358,0.000033741475,0.00060704025,0.0026887904,0.000036755984,0.0006190207,0.0026789375,0.00031560316,0.00009543364,0.94473064,0.048100896,0.00006261939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011735539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013119328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.986401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017031845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0218893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9641426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592538197","doi":"10.1515/bjals-2016-0016","title":"Investor-State Dispute Settlement and the Future of the Precautionary Principle","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Sovereignty; Investment (military); International trade; Scope (computer science); Business; Uncertainty; State (computer science); European union; International economics; Economics; Public economics; Economic policy; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.008697889591839276,"score_gpt":0.2186868702454752,"score_spread":0.20998898065363591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592538197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08476075,0.0057669794,0.068088695,0.08732445,0.0006646928,0.00020355848,0.000066728695,0.00007316786,0.75305104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96389216,0.0010863006,0.005921508,0.004928899,0.00041854547,0.0001767116,0.00002283831,0.00002460693,0.023528427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845686,0.0066454126,0.0008076167,0.0021107239,0.0033933355,0.0024742857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96993446,0.020934798,0.0028375196,0.0027269116,0.00271847,0.00084784575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025676379,0.000375449,0.0007340138,0.0010956529,0.0063274885,0.010142655,0.0024368856,0.015782805,0.008030775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033828806,0.00050379755,0.0013847557,0.0010276522,0.025033949,0.010263622,0.0072491653,0.012561665,0.0006559091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004866177,0.000009010278,0.000089112305,0.000008206385,0.0000024235412,0.00003622388,0.0002617728,0.0003015456,0.00004205748,0.99745125,0.0005032393,0.0012901828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031589974,0.000031659045,0.00029118973,0.000125629,0.000010316289,0.00006511185,0.00037882605,0.0017325397,0.00028760658,0.9706359,0.026388975,0.000020624484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059904894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004709246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025676379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00707607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008589638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1357913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594795538","doi":"10.1515/bjals-2016-0019","title":"The Two Noble Kinsmen: Internal and Legal Transparency in the WTO and Their Connection to Preferential and Regional Trade Agreements","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); International trade; Negotiation; International trade law; International economics; Declaration; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.023101931491536002,"score_gpt":0.2989851440975537,"score_spread":0.2758832126060177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594795538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104599975,0.0065644393,0.08036481,0.17629851,0.0018832239,0.0001399435,0.00012866553,0.0001021089,0.6299183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98344004,0.0006875552,0.0035653857,0.0040775086,0.0003698522,0.000049945742,0.000015215634,0.00003322031,0.007761172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9671473,0.019335963,0.0013391044,0.0022976974,0.0074281218,0.0024518776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94585294,0.038216565,0.0066179256,0.00418487,0.0035076148,0.001620112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021320593,0.00029187053,0.0005187315,0.0017332819,0.0048491405,0.016291706,0.0010925198,0.0069198497,0.004168318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042609584,0.000492267,0.00069705985,0.0016738136,0.044657692,0.011666177,0.008377462,0.010880947,0.0003030693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009407761,0.0000053732533,0.00031156844,0.000018591607,0.0000028653742,0.000050921262,0.0021056118,0.0001305342,0.0000604083,0.9944073,0.0007596742,0.002137772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018020073,0.000026555523,0.0015509796,0.0003501594,0.000017407217,0.00018764225,0.004388439,0.0011579564,0.00048243,0.94296783,0.04880771,0.000044931436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044032517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032718736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021320593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062546562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056710104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11275542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807483693","doi":"10.2478/bjals-2018-0006","title":"Acts of State, State Immunity, and Judicial Review in the United States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Doctrine; Political science; Sovereign immunity; Alien Tort Statute; Statute; State immunity; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; State (computer science); Constitution; Common law; Qualified immunity; Tort; Liability","score_opus":0.028300283738999107,"score_gpt":0.3533581357669763,"score_spread":0.32505785202797716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807483693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16422768,0.12233492,0.008368384,0.16145943,0.0053271726,0.00054026075,0.000748116,0.00022701183,0.536767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9066792,0.01831933,0.0025360426,0.027717894,0.0025591354,0.00029814776,0.00021532734,0.000036293128,0.04163861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9743936,0.010138957,0.0022250134,0.002041244,0.008061067,0.0031401878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91024256,0.06023566,0.005248952,0.002305173,0.019571103,0.0023965724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031597923,0.00027550178,0.00082687713,0.0050526983,0.006088033,0.011409187,0.0017620618,0.010524274,0.003928492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050566915,0.00066272926,0.00068895565,0.0033552004,0.007627603,0.0031973547,0.0031027764,0.00528587,0.00043925885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062708525,0.0000899508,0.0038590431,0.00025230262,0.000073564006,0.0013154272,0.0032756987,0.0023917358,0.0003716564,0.8794189,0.08169205,0.027196923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015756613,0.00012979479,0.016474029,0.001718832,0.00019517593,0.0004651345,0.0032355133,0.0075653032,0.0011355489,0.2086178,0.7600475,0.00025778462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10211203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16050622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10211203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014888358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03295156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20303535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883228411","doi":"10.2478/bjals-2019-0014","title":"“Felix Cohen Was the Blackstone of Federal Indian Law:” Taking the Comparison Seriously","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jurisprudence; Law; Scholarship; Politics; Legal history; Civil servant; Legal education; Common law; Political science; Servant; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.025935630180175015,"score_gpt":0.3256007071614473,"score_spread":0.29966507698127226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883228411","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10208525,0.030182093,0.0032400084,0.4640107,0.0030509627,0.000028384233,0.00009309539,0.00004439188,0.3972652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9423615,0.003736571,0.00054809626,0.03215919,0.0011431125,0.000026126185,0.00002071331,0.000034540943,0.0199701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562705,0.0020158165,0.00006920065,0.000616273,0.0009046368,0.00076699926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928382,0.0045947693,0.00035772176,0.00029483915,0.0013845408,0.0005300365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005629136,0.00023446331,0.00040052805,0.0023682849,0.010830028,0.007911912,0.00075373414,0.0045838207,0.0032693397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013305264,0.0001667612,0.00017364013,0.0015753943,0.020549309,0.0072735674,0.0024611226,0.0060304943,0.00029396164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023637927,0.000010130418,0.0007967746,0.000019561632,0.000004440584,0.00008055937,0.012999591,0.000041526786,0.000061347506,0.95170796,0.027486745,0.0067677414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001902603,0.00004249792,0.0050738743,0.0005110274,0.000019079704,0.000307831,0.030667596,0.00024674294,0.0006132603,0.21976463,0.74266994,0.00006447543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048777647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05012049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048777647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012904196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007295937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09698743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387976370","doi":"10.2478/bjals-2023-0011","title":"Magical Thinking and Appearance-based Recusal","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Precept; Jurisprudence; Law; Obligation; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Moral obligation; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03865647748839743,"score_gpt":0.3557058915749545,"score_spread":0.31704941408655707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387976370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12587146,0.0024892576,0.088660456,0.041568123,0.00124344,0.00007776545,0.00005140879,0.0001662479,0.7398718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98855746,0.00023760005,0.0037361153,0.0011950204,0.00014218659,0.000017367887,0.000010678231,0.000042810592,0.0060607954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883343,0.007033655,0.00033253303,0.0013574614,0.0021868083,0.0007552626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858262,0.008772949,0.0014943468,0.0015474581,0.0019405938,0.00041841343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009337509,0.00044888325,0.00039767777,0.002204236,0.0048394306,0.008527942,0.0019666932,0.0035073997,0.004586641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018194122,0.00032395584,0.00048765488,0.00090014725,0.06812982,0.009995166,0.005322649,0.0068707145,0.00044154873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007121775,0.0000037455034,0.00008278428,0.000013315891,0.0000016941885,0.00007447222,0.008301071,0.000056161098,0.000051819014,0.9890216,0.00072050997,0.0016656871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015955155,0.000018199042,0.00030111943,0.00015090723,0.000010458787,0.00028356156,0.012485239,0.00088245946,0.0005269642,0.9208533,0.06444473,0.00002707711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018928103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025703972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009337509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004667767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025509377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04938209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}