{"meta":{"query_hash":"90485a53b7d4","filters":{"venue":"British Journal of Political Science"},"cohort_total":70,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":70,"exported":70,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/90485a53b7d4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=British+Journal+of+Political+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W1981282433","doi":"10.1017/s0007123408000094","title":"When to Coalesce: Early Versus Late Coalition Announcement in an Experimental Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Democracy; Quarter (Canadian coin); Multi-party system; Ideal point; Government (linguistics); Political science; Point (geometry); Political economy; Politics; Law and economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.05997758551996048,"score_gpt":0.4048742977799636,"score_spread":0.3448967122600031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981282433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89695793,0.00031278818,0.019537065,0.0058654277,0.00026448624,0.00080983166,0.00025806614,0.000085540734,0.07590882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925532,0.000059981434,0.0029819543,0.0006380927,0.00006227204,0.00058955094,0.000050524413,0.000024141036,0.0030403868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.986128,0.0100436015,0.0004296845,0.0013793862,0.0012730003,0.0007463241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9491217,0.03319329,0.007067335,0.0068457583,0.0013802428,0.0023917484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02652555,0.0002283566,0.00074924756,0.0006284108,0.0021566194,0.004701187,0.0012976589,0.0016356573,0.016972449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06228533,0.00037090815,0.0004099616,0.0007667741,0.0056312745,0.005233467,0.0040012985,0.0030923868,0.0010141757],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010728995,0.0069353567,0.032024007,0.00047729985,0.00020437443,0.00045307193,0.016492236,0.004471174,0.009059728,0.8655823,0.003264871,0.05030655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006120663,0.008678508,0.030926079,0.00024157898,0.00018518636,0.00020137247,0.009807749,0.022505466,0.013305848,0.8740056,0.03382183,0.00020013549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007395786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010077496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02652555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016847709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016565378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14028215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982679242","doi":"10.1017/s0007123414000520","title":"Measuring the Cost of Privacy: A Look at the Distributional Effects of Private Bargaining","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Negotiation; Parallels; Plaintiff; Disadvantage; Settlement (finance); Business; International trade; Political science; Law; Economics; Law and economics; Finance; Payment","score_opus":0.030880142646989343,"score_gpt":0.29100361592132823,"score_spread":0.2601234732743389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982679242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37491712,0.00991144,0.081139565,0.062270265,0.0004967956,0.00023875848,0.0006334956,0.000053153788,0.47033942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923793,0.001226361,0.002392317,0.0011022687,0.00018602834,0.000064880034,0.000047426205,0.000024857341,0.0025764706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96633697,0.020924311,0.00078793464,0.0014665041,0.008254953,0.002229323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82150316,0.15063407,0.010464374,0.010269826,0.005918052,0.0012104551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01943284,0.000367372,0.0008431688,0.0024814669,0.003007996,0.008353081,0.0019158471,0.0032106526,0.011018252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0947369,0.0003692915,0.0010211768,0.0045644585,0.014135179,0.014639492,0.0060028215,0.006455068,0.00043973123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000172532,0.0001612349,0.014285302,0.00017197199,0.00011370254,0.00015047647,0.0014829021,0.009902204,0.00038755004,0.9411982,0.0023942608,0.029579636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035086094,0.00023456907,0.020490693,0.00032445946,0.00011616674,0.0003371236,0.0047404305,0.010869944,0.0010710098,0.9436549,0.018056525,0.00006914784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029864898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003289066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01943284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006733442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022047197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10277194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002829966","doi":"10.1017/s000712340800032x","title":"If Winning Isn't Everything, Why Do They Keep Score? Consequences of Electoral Performance for Party Leaders","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislature; Political science; Minor (academic); Premise; Divided government; Single non-transferable vote; Position (finance); Public administration; Political economy; Business; Law; Economics; Democracy; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.07708157369696257,"score_gpt":0.3493291413140633,"score_spread":0.2722475676171007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002829966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928752,0.000100856436,0.00014628455,0.00079193106,0.000017836648,0.0000071218824,0.00011678327,0.0000058333026,0.0059381574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990164,0.000022068669,0.000019510297,0.000033389148,0.000011719957,0.0000024590834,0.000056896337,0.0000028272905,0.00083470927],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978269,0.0005255823,0.000084711995,0.00022001618,0.00031956346,0.0010231805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889552,0.002266068,0.0040126466,0.0005194997,0.0007756584,0.003470943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029837056,0.00011858369,0.00039121183,0.0007662508,0.0012971028,0.0023324525,0.00046255533,0.00062682113,0.007186626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015744787,0.0001049502,0.0003883505,0.00088395795,0.001252449,0.0010735057,0.00165888,0.001393627,0.0015311007],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003641334,0.00011851697,0.97500014,0.000014243501,0.00009850386,0.000150907,0.0015536869,0.00051572255,0.0003845441,0.0016118005,0.00107485,0.019112894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008871938,0.00017224086,0.99490875,0.0000069871667,0.000018069037,0.000035232948,0.0028602367,0.00024907076,0.00012529701,0.00065084937,0.0009571319,0.000007293008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058998605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013278822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007186626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066727505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005387119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024041653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015932347","doi":"10.1017/s0007123408000112","title":"The Politics of When: Redistribution, Investment and Policy Making for the Long Term","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Politics; Economics; Argument (complex analysis); Public economics; Term (time); Investment (military); Pension; Positive economics; Political science; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.0393832673218768,"score_gpt":0.3635690604770098,"score_spread":0.324185793155133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015932347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32944682,0.013720457,0.021178134,0.27796778,0.0005275761,0.000030492105,0.00018042195,0.000052201252,0.35689607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904186,0.0009678095,0.0005971464,0.0015890528,0.00012319704,0.0000113524475,0.00001044182,0.000019446778,0.0062629576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747086,0.0012985503,0.00006111038,0.00027569744,0.00028091585,0.0006129193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976342,0.0010387007,0.00043846716,0.00021720493,0.00026063895,0.00041070872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004947331,0.00014345793,0.0003942799,0.0006941956,0.0026461014,0.010095217,0.0004790065,0.0024628453,0.0059164567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0079725245,0.0001916269,0.00023125186,0.0009227422,0.009888381,0.008013495,0.0016313787,0.00258722,0.0006877283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000893337,0.000037382124,0.0052085784,0.000058339643,0.000033670505,0.0000684263,0.0031209919,0.0012803732,0.00064528367,0.9588031,0.004029676,0.026624832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022301396,0.00003126502,0.011914985,0.00021546647,0.000032213422,0.000072233306,0.008822767,0.0014457881,0.00080953847,0.91147995,0.06512952,0.000023906108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004280039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006148733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010095217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005470369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027681238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039690435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016627412","doi":"10.1017/s0007123401000242","title":"Portfolio Salience and the Proportionality of Payoffs in Coalition Governments","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":246,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Salience (neuroscience); Negotiation; Portfolio; Legislature; Proportionality (law); Political science; Economics; Positive economics; Law and economics; Law; Financial economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.027390092862322458,"score_gpt":0.34632175898142414,"score_spread":0.3189316661191017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016627412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9320515,0.0004927543,0.034658123,0.002148327,0.000028001754,0.000056717967,0.000081562255,0.000037698304,0.03044523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997863,0.00007919472,0.0012829276,0.000030945856,0.000028698652,0.000015902891,0.000022081063,0.000005425573,0.000671799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99278754,0.003979898,0.00046017356,0.00083491567,0.0014093979,0.0005281272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.943304,0.039592206,0.009934924,0.0034116195,0.0019285866,0.0018286152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010565637,0.00024849814,0.0006945057,0.0019395531,0.0015568073,0.004580958,0.0006783854,0.0010032773,0.0060792505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.098184705,0.00036091128,0.00040235117,0.002052037,0.00507697,0.0063824398,0.0043038893,0.001802311,0.00036428415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006728375,0.000250437,0.15130658,0.00017568946,0.00019838783,0.00025151143,0.0065631927,0.011658048,0.0025041741,0.7246771,0.0008476854,0.10089441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010126928,0.00021781739,0.14865296,0.000051781182,0.00006949497,0.00026998395,0.00240958,0.01786192,0.0010544584,0.8251774,0.0040902756,0.000043056276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001167196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014669773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010565637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001963767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075780513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05587709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041314074","doi":"10.1017/s0007123411000160","title":"Language and Ideology in Congress","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Legislature; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Politics; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03988064428790917,"score_gpt":0.38087672527563565,"score_spread":0.3409960809877265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041314074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.978255,0.0016741036,0.00023007512,0.00088623865,0.000057287598,0.000008511232,0.0005658733,0.000009103448,0.018313937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971994,0.00051024294,0.0001847361,0.00006578738,0.000058341557,0.000015936923,0.00040079083,0.000011733904,0.0015530258],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750155,0.001248173,0.00019621794,0.00024693905,0.0005660599,0.00024114488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98932344,0.0066389847,0.0026953819,0.00023896173,0.0007750483,0.000328093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017241472,0.00013760201,0.00027237242,0.004197621,0.0010670974,0.0030953882,0.00021030557,0.00036586353,0.0062683607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013561379,0.00010776351,0.00018183113,0.0054108943,0.0012822968,0.0010132771,0.0012918457,0.00061949965,0.00096248527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009254325,0.0003774277,0.6649885,0.00065163366,0.00024864482,0.0023717158,0.100472346,0.0013169383,0.0048792125,0.02614229,0.012155389,0.1854705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001870508,0.00010494735,0.9375725,0.00033070045,0.00004468232,0.0006359175,0.030225258,0.0010468541,0.0005850993,0.0034119918,0.025974708,0.000048700807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024585275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004007597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062683607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088140165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006290037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020969748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044094458","doi":"10.1017/s000712340600007x","title":"Political Decentralization and Electoral Accountability: The Argentine Experience, 1983–2001","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Accountability; Political science; Referendum; Politics; Presidential system; Blame; Public administration; Voting; Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Political economy; Survey data collection; Public economics; Economics; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.022849154808947964,"score_gpt":0.35467829088354735,"score_spread":0.3318291360745994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044094458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98594344,0.0005396298,0.000091331225,0.0017130969,0.00001999679,0.00001093236,0.00020566858,0.000007965166,0.011467992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99487275,0.0004153559,0.000038593444,0.000074253025,0.000025441801,0.000009101242,0.0001796215,0.000008206634,0.004376673],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952865,0.0001478215,0.000022478915,0.000056861976,0.0000666887,0.00017743536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801195,0.00052355474,0.00069131603,0.00013298138,0.00036794634,0.00027214387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013745218,0.00012636693,0.00042620828,0.00044278055,0.0017100647,0.0010990629,0.00025429917,0.00034297485,0.0038394567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004432928,0.00017719281,0.000083970735,0.0011354099,0.0008832162,0.0008122706,0.0010792532,0.0010287175,0.00029983296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011114923,0.00033682113,0.68816084,0.0002971206,0.000052904143,0.0013039724,0.15605284,0.0011310875,0.0011036574,0.010089665,0.016656294,0.1237034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036014277,0.0001144206,0.9225646,0.00005668998,0.000014412904,0.00020277487,0.026493696,0.0004509358,0.00018516449,0.00043023875,0.049435146,0.000016010603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11491133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.161098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11491133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027429082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008057285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22848493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051392286","doi":"10.1017/s0007123410000013","title":"The Dynamics of Ethnonationalist Contention","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamism; Politics; Incentive; Context (archaeology); Political science; Political economy; Dynamics (music); Nationalism; Contentious politics; Social movement; Economic system; Sociology; Economics; Law; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.029779799831743663,"score_gpt":0.36697273342941994,"score_spread":0.33719293359767627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051392286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90914667,0.0002704861,0.005765035,0.0013643026,0.000021960677,0.00004507156,0.000036686208,0.000022748569,0.08332701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989103,0.000028404445,0.0003133198,0.000017587674,0.000004280356,0.000012784097,0.000008290892,0.0000034774964,0.00070150895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950918,0.002539413,0.00013922852,0.00046424867,0.0009493714,0.0008158789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910252,0.0056015966,0.0012428004,0.0006861177,0.00060211256,0.0008421696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036118408,0.00016151006,0.00027368983,0.0031771031,0.0048000095,0.005503146,0.0010061264,0.0009096984,0.0047290893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016106274,0.00025875383,0.00019174861,0.002364694,0.011164325,0.0036932405,0.00696588,0.0011585156,0.00023832051],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023480007,0.00017070986,0.05858194,0.00012281754,0.000037121958,0.0014270731,0.3458224,0.00082841265,0.0044630417,0.5360459,0.0015698868,0.050696023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008674784,0.00018087306,0.14084244,0.0002080301,0.000028643748,0.0016067566,0.47381476,0.008298436,0.0016567624,0.308735,0.06444173,0.00009988731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003195369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003629073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005503146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030376043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015638117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022039473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061885562","doi":"10.1017/s0007123412000051","title":"Global Migration and Political Regime Type: A Democratic Disadvantage","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autocracy; Democracy; Divergence (linguistics); Emigration; Politics; Globalization; Immigration; Disadvantage; Development economics; Order (exchange); Capital (architecture); Economics; Economic system; Political science; Political economy; Economic geography; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.012897605645456936,"score_gpt":0.33010439615750553,"score_spread":0.3172067905120486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061885562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98237175,0.00015332672,0.000673539,0.0006496539,0.00001772183,0.000007984808,0.00011933732,0.0000064639876,0.016000275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992555,0.00004350171,0.00012846192,0.000040848732,0.000018289342,0.0000042251913,0.00004010685,0.0000045477777,0.00046447353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991573,0.00038842636,0.000043874807,0.00014766035,0.00012305417,0.00013977349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99588096,0.0013596008,0.001678081,0.00048591947,0.00014513948,0.00045030107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011250286,0.00012889314,0.00026262866,0.00075103686,0.0007007369,0.0015543633,0.00020943429,0.00036447417,0.008995391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053674416,0.00007775609,0.00029459374,0.0016285946,0.0013660722,0.0011511885,0.0020175923,0.0007433096,0.000407618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026998742,0.00013873595,0.9428455,0.000040787436,0.00011210776,0.00017859942,0.0030322836,0.00062548544,0.0014678647,0.020489447,0.00085000007,0.029949116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025532874,0.00017221211,0.97294384,0.00003762812,0.00006976263,0.0004086947,0.0040098503,0.0010324098,0.00033510884,0.015118058,0.0058290563,0.000017939112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067639607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016543258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008995391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027955082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021322335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030092537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063608249","doi":"10.1017/s0007123405000153","title":"Political Knowledge and Enlightened Preferences: Party Choice Through the Electoral Cycle","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Explanatory power; Politics; Power (physics); Panel data; Panel survey; Work (physics); Predictive power; Political science; Positive economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.04842319659622016,"score_gpt":0.3751515009704209,"score_spread":0.32672830437420075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063608249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970391,0.00013419556,0.00032110617,0.00009984291,0.0000023361592,0.00000786055,0.000105825166,0.000002819204,0.0022869182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871004,0.000061233346,0.00009574054,0.000013097773,0.000004772909,0.000005136382,0.00018446715,0.0000019490485,0.0009234662],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902844,0.00043915343,0.000038328948,0.0001028451,0.00014921009,0.00024196265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851068,0.010098696,0.0028193407,0.0006150393,0.0003860383,0.0009741021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019109552,0.00016527963,0.0004658916,0.0011948586,0.00067956623,0.0019704753,0.0005008689,0.00077167107,0.00806431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01020077,0.00018594915,0.000431606,0.0016113949,0.0010070086,0.0014336557,0.0012636195,0.000942189,0.00048843713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011184677,0.00044613928,0.9505589,0.00006964776,0.00022838518,0.00019864335,0.003202557,0.0045230426,0.0008104243,0.0038928536,0.00045619768,0.03449478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002736775,0.00024396497,0.9903106,0.000021732934,0.000047057172,0.000069120106,0.0014333299,0.003714851,0.00029654635,0.0023214773,0.001493678,0.000020414122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021123413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034895033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021123413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011057878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054072595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04200089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074487618","doi":"10.1017/s0007123406000299","title":"Demotion and Dissent in the Canadian Liberal Party","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Cabinet (room); Political science; Loyalty; Dissent; Law; Ideology; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.012263867012593962,"score_gpt":0.2806476569936694,"score_spread":0.2683837899810754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074487618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15862398,0.0034037784,0.00042711475,0.0961874,0.002727377,0.000090392154,0.0002742387,0.000066331406,0.73819935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7736554,0.00090298895,0.0002579505,0.016428389,0.00023379149,0.000031731375,0.000077939156,0.00007212608,0.20833963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933674,0.0007445353,0.00009556052,0.00066764926,0.0017126369,0.003412151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966912,0.00061847956,0.00013754415,0.00013082128,0.0009452144,0.0014766695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004025465,0.0004728436,0.00044968052,0.0018806692,0.07001598,0.01271924,0.0017839855,0.005009208,0.017637463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00811378,0.00037879875,0.000495987,0.0022349556,0.025333049,0.0024098093,0.007611183,0.009339566,0.0012906631],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011127584,0.000058339498,0.003127111,0.000055471643,0.000018183358,0.000915152,0.11026787,0.00023453128,0.00039781726,0.7126316,0.15343398,0.018748617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038573293,0.000017113793,0.008732064,0.00011595712,0.000015000508,0.00010551041,0.090024345,0.00022064873,0.00036983934,0.012653945,0.8876027,0.00010427699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9803094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99136835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16553366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16553366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.112107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96786267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081833995","doi":"10.1017/s0007123400220292","title":"The Effect of Referendumson Democratic Citizens: Information, Politicization, Efficacy and Tolerance","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Democracy; Political science; Voting; Government (linguistics); Direct democracy; Politics; Public administration; Affect (linguistics); Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.006461183474082537,"score_gpt":0.2715172338655089,"score_spread":0.2650560503914264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081833995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98391944,0.0002449665,0.00022525873,0.00076276605,0.000017437673,0.000013611242,0.000030022497,0.000005877197,0.014780545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995129,0.000058399444,0.00006077442,0.000050012946,0.000014172469,0.000006957426,0.00001787813,0.000002132257,0.00027684364],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99063253,0.00594672,0.0004540359,0.000635565,0.0014466752,0.0008845309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8454246,0.11415573,0.026114931,0.0060019307,0.0032574874,0.005045343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011576605,0.00024293225,0.00048317522,0.0014077955,0.0010779297,0.003456822,0.0006193482,0.0014336209,0.005345608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052253287,0.00022931599,0.0004083151,0.0012087334,0.0045174803,0.0018792463,0.002154359,0.0018292484,0.00036044707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031099478,0.0047357385,0.856561,0.00032409272,0.00041509097,0.00033680102,0.028409269,0.0021375061,0.0030257362,0.025904447,0.0013571257,0.073683225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119352924,0.00096338516,0.97266364,0.00009229354,0.00010485123,0.00014087267,0.010019531,0.0013241493,0.0012914657,0.01059704,0.002633128,0.00005024909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015078455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014780014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011576605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010550373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008227658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061223686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082480816","doi":"10.1017/s0007123405000190","title":"‘Presidentialization’ in Japan? The Prime Minister, Media and Elections in Japan","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Politics; Political science; Popularity; Phenomenon; Democracy; Bureaucracy; Presidential system; Prime (order theory); Political economy; Nomination; Political culture; Public administration; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.014998176537438243,"score_gpt":0.30483332345285424,"score_spread":0.289835146915416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082480816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6856072,0.05363531,0.0003308855,0.11910847,0.0016720012,0.00001767268,0.00014477556,0.000024451994,0.13945934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821186,0.008635285,0.00007748773,0.0028856818,0.0007688146,0.000009583276,0.000037445254,0.000010316367,0.0054567107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987214,0.0004529328,0.000079211015,0.00013767679,0.00013905717,0.00046966007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967258,0.0006322865,0.0011259831,0.000077023185,0.00033268923,0.0011061887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024619796,0.00016535814,0.00035422118,0.0013984079,0.0040465016,0.005505325,0.00029542655,0.0013895187,0.0042072013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004134971,0.0003487151,0.0001963889,0.003036999,0.0037921313,0.0033163938,0.002051256,0.0017368136,0.00024379611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073379086,0.00045818908,0.25084138,0.002079895,0.00017510429,0.0045267898,0.20139945,0.0005595223,0.0023336587,0.30380508,0.105197646,0.12788945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059703187,0.00013622487,0.6788778,0.0004512017,0.00009374669,0.0005012152,0.09119882,0.00028800327,0.00025165253,0.011863793,0.21618012,0.00009777786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047252502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084514424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047252502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044083567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003145776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09395492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087358759","doi":"10.1017/s0007123414000076","title":"Global Experimentalist Governance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Science, Research, and Medicine","field":"Medicine","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.017838532965907074,"score_gpt":0.3608016357382262,"score_spread":0.3429631027723191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087358759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017330507,0.0033875275,0.10002141,0.056858536,0.0010503692,0.00038697605,0.00019217638,0.00022621485,0.8205464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90881115,0.0027620343,0.027613811,0.012096219,0.0010423232,0.0012560198,0.00021600537,0.000118066244,0.0460843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892083,0.006364612,0.00028791235,0.0017934697,0.0014552188,0.00089045626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99154633,0.003978863,0.00060408586,0.0026536,0.0006972524,0.00051983265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013538655,0.00038230867,0.00048045084,0.0011678938,0.003482173,0.006710446,0.0011915512,0.0030520367,0.008018424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013869563,0.00024093075,0.00053219404,0.0011141686,0.030067557,0.005643024,0.00638701,0.0036214653,0.0007400686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001658043,0.0000032177213,0.00006929909,0.000009300659,0.0000013229956,0.0000070153856,0.00020251054,0.0001252008,0.000018582692,0.99736196,0.00086929114,0.0013306784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016926917,0.000020562165,0.00025054478,0.000081338905,0.0000036137023,0.000034549223,0.00040675772,0.0005598528,0.000101399695,0.8954281,0.103087515,0.000008820884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028962274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028839468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013538655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065259826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006051828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07160014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091844576","doi":"10.1017/s0007123404000092","title":"Referendum Voting as Political Choice: The Case of Quebec","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Voting; Status quo bias; Public economics; Multicollinearity; Politics; Status quo; Economics; Political science; Positive economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Regression analysis; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.047048196407669184,"score_gpt":0.3836183567624699,"score_spread":0.33657016035480075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091844576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.954571,0.0021230667,0.0017856952,0.0046143215,0.000037081958,0.00006884137,0.002057012,0.000032580538,0.034710392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942842,0.00024273703,0.00043284526,0.00017617039,0.000009572304,0.000014621587,0.00047695442,0.0000058091805,0.004356942],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785525,0.0009482032,0.000037545815,0.00019629425,0.00031338818,0.0006492226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928005,0.003883082,0.00092136115,0.00046458293,0.0013873179,0.00054317166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024776056,0.00026868487,0.0007967736,0.0016771435,0.0040281005,0.0029126422,0.0015201545,0.0011529548,0.00870707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008958354,0.00013202915,0.00058810075,0.005372645,0.0020825218,0.0012296905,0.000868395,0.001592386,0.00036049364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014334333,0.000515572,0.64290506,0.00030807566,0.0007154357,0.0029235703,0.0112758735,0.03787936,0.0011093427,0.20049545,0.030580197,0.06985861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030747033,0.00015428117,0.79928285,0.00016201111,0.00028644956,0.00033448878,0.010797075,0.10891013,0.00051053765,0.02288614,0.056162857,0.00020566909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9838484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9870313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028900694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028900694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068636443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20969021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094366616","doi":"10.1017/s0007123401000230","title":"The Transformation of Southern Politics Revisited: The House of Representatives as a Window","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Desegregation; Politics; Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Identity (music); Race (biology); Resistance (ecology); Identity politics; Sociology; Public administration; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.03442542746681318,"score_gpt":0.36660019240305475,"score_spread":0.33217476493624154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094366616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34496808,0.008891366,0.002239641,0.21644041,0.0022517198,0.000023473383,0.0002102262,0.000088238805,0.42488685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807123,0.00070745073,0.00019122576,0.004423767,0.00041564734,0.000009018133,0.00003058938,0.000061319384,0.013448729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970578,0.0014678668,0.000035362937,0.0002464961,0.00034538636,0.0008470747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980895,0.001024444,0.00016413956,0.00015934704,0.00010909408,0.00045341224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003607339,0.00024630985,0.00046869204,0.0011905358,0.0075933076,0.011369387,0.00068038737,0.0031108386,0.020698993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004216849,0.00038082147,0.00045816612,0.0019904152,0.0130491145,0.009213465,0.0058615445,0.0049516377,0.0008858939],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007211669,0.0000265264,0.0030701403,0.0000415081,0.000014113979,0.0004926761,0.065956354,0.00012177465,0.0003788907,0.894598,0.021430662,0.0137972245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004430693,0.0000873338,0.031277075,0.00021398724,0.000028372639,0.00043569106,0.15515538,0.0004976085,0.00070793397,0.17578848,0.6356998,0.00006402458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019084921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03264397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020698993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044776737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026592705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06924504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097128903","doi":"10.1017/s0007123412000269","title":"Measuring the Median: The Risks of Inferring Beliefs from Votes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Congruence (geometry); Ideology; Virtue; Measure (data warehouse); Democracy; Core (optical fiber); Political science; Positive economics; Econometrics; Actuarial science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Computer science; Politics; Data mining","score_opus":0.15574098343427084,"score_gpt":0.3943573260368243,"score_spread":0.23861634260255343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097128903","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36274874,0.0019288753,0.59924066,0.009083803,0.00051773695,0.0002667166,0.0013714386,0.00063888764,0.024203071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95961,0.00020746142,0.038304053,0.000708348,0.00014735143,0.00020632218,0.00026115117,0.00008888815,0.000466478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8672212,0.10822182,0.0041905725,0.006803722,0.01246751,0.0010952267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.34235242,0.5467479,0.028764984,0.07016794,0.010464383,0.001502326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.113641635,0.0009173125,0.002265932,0.0027710828,0.0021482562,0.0052026557,0.0027805336,0.003043464,0.0032283403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5470347,0.0010970269,0.0011241934,0.0038843509,0.00830377,0.009926755,0.006892957,0.0052060136,0.00086129736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030781096,0.0003364806,0.25417984,0.0014272835,0.0023223436,0.00032269373,0.010964129,0.064094946,0.0030146856,0.35748187,0.009194342,0.29358333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097972516,0.0004736552,0.048535425,0.0006318632,0.00017258964,0.00039435507,0.0026753817,0.08125006,0.0060389633,0.8517872,0.007674745,0.00026779535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00333413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020839928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113641635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001833326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012660295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6010016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106901522","doi":"10.1017/s0007123414000192","title":"Ideological Clarity in Multiparty Competition: A New Measure and Test Using Election Manifestos","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; CLARITY; Ambiguity; Appeal; Manifesto; Political science; Competition (biology); Democracy; Position (finance); Computer science; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.055855599701273954,"score_gpt":0.3521060277296881,"score_spread":0.2962504280284141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106901522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9523388,0.000093613016,0.028758734,0.00044090717,0.000029886465,0.00031875705,0.00017711242,0.00005815137,0.017784111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954921,0.000014251381,0.004120951,0.000018971556,0.000014425754,0.00014141873,0.000054533473,0.0000104679,0.00013276763],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97382283,0.015665017,0.001703619,0.0019936194,0.0060778772,0.00073711254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7037941,0.23265998,0.03543032,0.016083496,0.008267034,0.0037649919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028273223,0.00051657646,0.0006920782,0.004495468,0.002574169,0.005057167,0.0012915222,0.0019171769,0.005872483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18323068,0.00043562497,0.0008857479,0.004236157,0.010435741,0.0078069856,0.0061700763,0.0023985442,0.00040746396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013896766,0.0018815517,0.65929276,0.00039844436,0.00047421287,0.00031700477,0.047183633,0.008993415,0.0057049184,0.16185683,0.0009979275,0.1115096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031675064,0.0032699462,0.7766753,0.00024989218,0.00021259591,0.00034912786,0.021525305,0.082633704,0.0064826743,0.100404784,0.0075976267,0.0002823306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012535261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007626372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028273223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022186348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011552904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14952487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109759438","doi":"10.1017/s0007123412000579","title":"Sorting Out Mechanical and Psychological Effects in Candidate Elections: An Appraisal with Experimental Data","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Condorcet method; Sorting; Measure (data warehouse); Disadvantage; Econometrics; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Algorithm; Voting; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07731461782229494,"score_gpt":0.43730696726130525,"score_spread":0.3599923494390103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109759438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8856853,0.02667719,0.027508827,0.005144624,0.000958666,0.0040151076,0.001422686,0.0001376373,0.04844982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691722,0.006658961,0.014853999,0.0019234852,0.0008289384,0.003129731,0.0011760991,0.00013121376,0.0021253978],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9337537,0.044087667,0.004855711,0.0038811122,0.012560954,0.00086096296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.42183277,0.5015854,0.022382718,0.03881675,0.013992119,0.0013901233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09092423,0.0012957575,0.0025820618,0.0023619416,0.0021084605,0.0031131757,0.0037448993,0.0020010723,0.01364773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29746562,0.0011201474,0.0025574372,0.0030880459,0.011300998,0.005407916,0.0040207934,0.0028208846,0.0015634677],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.056621354,0.037632916,0.18142486,0.030196449,0.009414606,0.0010829858,0.019846413,0.009205103,0.027320543,0.13065298,0.013107173,0.4834947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009131679,0.04329383,0.6591645,0.004950586,0.005724579,0.0011350049,0.0068893284,0.022432046,0.02273052,0.18598515,0.037765045,0.000797689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014855553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020239132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09092423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022396627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010962256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48085904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115791431","doi":"10.1017/s0007123404000250","title":"Review Article: Dismantling the Health Care State? Political Institutions, Public Policies and the Comparative Politics of Health Reform","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":164,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Politics; Legislature; Public administration; Political science; Health care reform; Welfare state; Health care; Autonomy; Health policy; Political economy; Public economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.0987380296949226,"score_gpt":0.43932075961605965,"score_spread":0.34058272992113703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115791431","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014841864,0.98933035,0.00004641432,0.00679923,0.0020085073,0.0000025676618,0.000010224754,0.0000018099488,0.0016524389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025892837,0.9891538,0.000055832734,0.0023417317,0.0051352596,0.000006705403,0.000016777252,0.000002363959,0.0006981918],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864525,0.00064598717,0.00007603771,0.00021590882,0.00030491612,0.000111964386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956873,0.0033277285,0.00029925743,0.00006668656,0.00038690167,0.00023206032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013978992,0.0007646194,0.0016871266,0.002279892,0.0008170019,0.003467349,0.001245568,0.0058917333,0.0077076247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038844158,0.0003148087,0.00041544784,0.0067490637,0.0034209331,0.0036831112,0.001247009,0.0030479233,0.0015194193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015066448,0.00008504956,0.0005189304,0.039990988,0.00025862054,0.0003073303,0.00091098924,0.0012003632,0.0004327353,0.099934846,0.34214836,0.5140612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034249457,0.000067591754,0.0024659222,0.013858371,0.00010059182,0.00038093788,0.00096411066,0.00016197495,0.00007835824,0.015655555,0.9662067,0.000025646204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005497478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009771968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077076247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030103705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039930004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025784552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118134033","doi":"10.1017/s0007123405000074","title":"Inaccurate, Exceptional, One-Sided or Irrelevant? The Debate about the Alleged Decline of Social Capital and Civic Engagement in Western Societies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":314,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Civic engagement; Social capital; Politics; Attendance; Political capital; Club; Sociology; Political science; Political economy; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.04857407959227192,"score_gpt":0.33991598366656905,"score_spread":0.29134190407429716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118134033","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005340487,0.02212919,0.0012409021,0.9280063,0.009027238,0.000005817244,0.0000796172,0.000029822872,0.03414053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44766378,0.038571227,0.0016009569,0.46843904,0.030590616,0.000034435732,0.00017672211,0.00015818336,0.012765068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823229,0.010074282,0.00093752256,0.0022190216,0.0033906135,0.0010556997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9526607,0.031243324,0.004666039,0.0033548316,0.0055631823,0.0025118957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022383926,0.00057331653,0.0013821108,0.0026295034,0.006446392,0.015036554,0.0027517225,0.011524298,0.0044230833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07474113,0.00049634505,0.00040234692,0.0026820835,0.061620228,0.027319971,0.0053415885,0.016397487,0.0023819518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103249055,0.000040062823,0.0049773045,0.0005050941,0.000074339645,0.00068583514,0.059395596,0.000087056265,0.00016357178,0.6280244,0.23851475,0.06742868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002524108,0.000040876454,0.0028709674,0.0024320732,0.000045064688,0.00087549916,0.060017355,0.0002229779,0.00026038382,0.3969342,0.53620017,0.00007527241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076559996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006508862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022383926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042306874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038973247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11837894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124336077","doi":"10.1017/s000712340500013x","title":"Interpreting a Bill of Rights: The Importance of Legislative Rights Review","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legislature; Legislation; Judgement; Law and economics; Bill of rights; Law; Politics; Fundamental rights; Parliament; Human rights; Premise; State (computer science); Welfare rights; Judicial review; Social rights; Reservation of rights; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.0211615574922424,"score_gpt":0.3325517148328495,"score_spread":0.3113901573406071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124336077","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009083976,0.036218002,0.11269701,0.6700038,0.010830934,0.00041191588,0.000073685296,0.00016848116,0.16051236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57854664,0.029767381,0.11711354,0.21223213,0.028937407,0.0017965061,0.00017129527,0.0005269598,0.030908195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7414549,0.18812884,0.01308111,0.00953774,0.039891157,0.007906275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.61992836,0.33799568,0.008698624,0.012045941,0.018735975,0.0025955157],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.19981329,0.00061594014,0.002142245,0.0045497855,0.011225443,0.025126562,0.0043460284,0.024003008,0.0033734129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31390217,0.0012648809,0.0013127782,0.0029592447,0.05071859,0.029334858,0.00868861,0.025427245,0.0013282476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010986977,0.000011394682,0.00012664404,0.000106877924,0.000013291606,0.00010478065,0.003922726,0.00023031054,0.000109854314,0.9738367,0.008197981,0.013328386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030062027,0.000030594583,0.00027926973,0.0007999099,0.000024031646,0.000115270086,0.0015534343,0.0005654821,0.00030779844,0.7967284,0.19951373,0.00005205718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00405636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035545924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19981329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009997502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024201555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98677266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127216549","doi":"10.1017/s0007123406000408","title":"Truth, Agency and the Hutton Report: A Reply to Diana Coole","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Moral agency; Positivism; Meaning (existential); Focus (optics); Political philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.011647002410267593,"score_gpt":0.3006526339557286,"score_spread":0.289005631545461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127216549","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044174964,0.0020741285,0.00009731068,0.9915714,0.004726403,0.0000035982691,0.000008919896,0.000007953526,0.0010685858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017271165,0.0015377444,0.00031191128,0.96367955,0.012106849,0.00004385851,0.000011569949,0.00006694553,0.0049703703],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97500706,0.013384296,0.001431825,0.0034403708,0.0046100314,0.0021264357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83102596,0.14841034,0.0037273394,0.0027185122,0.009462164,0.0046556564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035196725,0.0011516447,0.0018910654,0.0019114055,0.012979412,0.017105076,0.0057538627,0.057891525,0.0064044856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13218713,0.0016559811,0.0011420274,0.0019776395,0.04087556,0.028701467,0.010900199,0.08466539,0.0019683272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055020213,0.000020223226,0.00032965816,0.00011579895,0.000012626788,0.00047827448,0.010561951,0.000053321466,0.00008537803,0.078118585,0.9057349,0.004434314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006655248,0.000034019766,0.000873847,0.00093901006,0.000014514089,0.00058734266,0.02261009,0.00027579762,0.00029542556,0.05791842,0.9162085,0.00017651991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020656424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018725393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057891525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01032099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00845036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1861403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127549877","doi":"10.1017/s0007123405000098","title":"To Adopt or Not to Adopt Proportional Representation: The Politics of Institutional Choice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Democracy; Legislature; Proportional representation; Politics; Political science; Representation (politics); Political economy; Economic history; Public administration; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04554029990027382,"score_gpt":0.37151503882375797,"score_spread":0.32597473892348416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127549877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25086275,0.0076350677,0.026930027,0.14967959,0.0007686563,0.00010178464,0.00008433737,0.000073306706,0.56386447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866145,0.000626114,0.0012501304,0.0036651192,0.00015657626,0.00004808906,0.000013828757,0.000030868297,0.007594836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9684258,0.021409526,0.00050865347,0.002644262,0.0022783575,0.0047334624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97715855,0.015832977,0.0019704562,0.0016863113,0.0014562333,0.0018954681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031943932,0.00027865937,0.00050265546,0.001582966,0.010717706,0.014621543,0.0014664654,0.00490552,0.005217368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035420537,0.00040107075,0.0004983724,0.0020548736,0.063157864,0.010333891,0.0075278473,0.006571667,0.0006267698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025100495,0.000012474409,0.0007489591,0.000011012722,0.000006357133,0.00005144176,0.0060729943,0.00019695076,0.0000659261,0.9863194,0.001491431,0.0049979463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000702227,0.000049882612,0.002533189,0.00015101519,0.000011434147,0.000100548314,0.009944625,0.00078588596,0.0003499176,0.89807993,0.08786693,0.000056443172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008806587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006893532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031943932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010193701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005302554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16893768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129925846","doi":"10.1017/s0007123412000117","title":"Why Do Citizens Discount the Future? Public Opinion and the Timing of Policy Consequences","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Economics; Public economics; Public opinion; Term (time); Consumption (sociology); Public policy; Politics; Causation; Time preference; Political science; Microeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.10372752853824548,"score_gpt":0.40588853933641783,"score_spread":0.30216101079817237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129925846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9570573,0.00063781237,0.0073124855,0.00840022,0.00009644576,0.000021423695,0.00016014016,0.000034811153,0.026279377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998248,0.00022348594,0.000492057,0.00036680256,0.000040982854,0.0000059836802,0.000026946766,0.0000073561228,0.0005885266],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986136,0.00068153156,0.00006200561,0.0001774192,0.00029338957,0.00017196995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98753905,0.0069815014,0.0029460276,0.0011284949,0.0008492075,0.00055564294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039982894,0.00018919373,0.000363618,0.0003848018,0.00047504014,0.0025937792,0.00029709275,0.0016162659,0.002581238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024246218,0.00021545995,0.0003274625,0.00047169274,0.0013366994,0.0028666856,0.0006084603,0.0018080333,0.0003850365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047450047,0.00092190556,0.40753463,0.000570174,0.0006986581,0.0009082783,0.034049466,0.013216391,0.0242527,0.25282562,0.009855533,0.2504217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033941393,0.0009113722,0.3466268,0.00022568717,0.0005341773,0.00055189343,0.023733478,0.021691604,0.0076516927,0.55935496,0.038092177,0.0002867418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022040766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019276398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039982894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008797454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003599905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021145284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137365216","doi":"10.1017/s0007123412000737","title":"Political Investment: Remittances and Elections","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Remittance; Politics; Developing country; Investment (military); Economics; Development economics; Foreign direct investment; Political science; Economic growth; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.017466402786076037,"score_gpt":0.3246055706736052,"score_spread":0.30713916788752915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137365216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9365136,0.0033805438,0.0018388272,0.0024547174,0.00006494207,0.000030429755,0.0006617859,0.00003439689,0.055020615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99437124,0.00044551105,0.000117708274,0.00006094268,0.000048298993,0.0000070058377,0.0002018072,0.000006294239,0.0047412487],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998362,0.00072028826,0.000083244915,0.00017262569,0.0001352454,0.0005267154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99110526,0.002421991,0.0046660504,0.0003261855,0.00038119857,0.0010993171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014142259,0.0001829368,0.00040444467,0.0009914318,0.00083946466,0.0025719746,0.00041605244,0.0005004222,0.010803962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01055275,0.00015434717,0.00021132911,0.0021619322,0.00084292825,0.0013076302,0.0010202248,0.0010823502,0.0010245611],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062855927,0.00032803076,0.82825124,0.00016520225,0.00021655078,0.00071186386,0.0029027623,0.00693929,0.00054631685,0.0865321,0.005953072,0.06682508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026230393,0.00019864243,0.9511838,0.00010782455,0.00004362626,0.00031697715,0.0026412143,0.0038451992,0.0002787043,0.016158065,0.025174491,0.000025250434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00720829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011464154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010803962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009056497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043066504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036142886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138082499","doi":"10.1017/s0007123405000347","title":"Opinion–Policy Dynamics: Public Preferences and Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":308,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Notice; Representation (politics); Politics; Public policy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public expenditure; Public economics; Structuring; Government spending; Work (physics); Preference; Public administration; Economics; Political economy; Welfare; Law; Public finance","score_opus":0.09131300604692778,"score_gpt":0.38736357279206474,"score_spread":0.29605056674513697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138082499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926986,0.000306644,0.00007605841,0.00088979607,0.000008277225,0.000003325908,0.00027988077,0.0000027427716,0.0057346127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99909186,0.00009323044,0.000017902685,0.00003101965,0.000003754683,0.0000024640326,0.0000935368,0.0000018554936,0.00066422],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983936,0.0006478088,0.00012339876,0.00012242117,0.00027428954,0.0004383929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938996,0.0022349667,0.0021986878,0.0002564502,0.0010068833,0.0004033995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014532655,0.00010692824,0.0003525033,0.0011620196,0.0006956865,0.0020970402,0.0002567767,0.00060292246,0.0048256665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008654731,0.00012828251,0.00023281755,0.0026975179,0.0006693932,0.0009799569,0.0014217679,0.00060584437,0.0006401699],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010068164,0.00013863377,0.9107821,0.0001904532,0.00014065857,0.000935377,0.030418435,0.0026910123,0.0017489039,0.009072199,0.0051654307,0.03770997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009834004,0.000027362175,0.9882052,0.000034115055,0.00001121302,0.0000634135,0.0073961345,0.0006490341,0.00012168443,0.00037574355,0.0030886752,0.000017569133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16681167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20883624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16681167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036174415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087279076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33168143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140944885","doi":"10.1017/s0007123412000555","title":"Auntie Knows Best? Public Broadcasters and Current Affairs Knowledge","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Political science; Independence (probability theory); Test (biology); Public relations; Advertising; Business; Biology","score_opus":0.05608512772890869,"score_gpt":0.37047331796478805,"score_spread":0.3143881902358794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140944885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9616811,0.0024974195,0.0003889882,0.011818273,0.00007007823,0.0000078359935,0.00027245196,0.000007577195,0.023256246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99575496,0.0015784665,0.00008780083,0.00048333677,0.00010346275,0.0000036635174,0.00013374934,0.0000057521884,0.0018487903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986877,0.0005161224,0.000077352735,0.00017069347,0.000322542,0.00022566313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649345,0.019463612,0.009961995,0.0011107513,0.0017608157,0.0027682402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032224169,0.000083316525,0.00038421334,0.0015776978,0.0007318506,0.003265833,0.0003563856,0.0010274231,0.007926835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026995696,0.0002544214,0.0002287085,0.0020874308,0.0016062495,0.0034461697,0.000868837,0.0014019936,0.0010020192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014706454,0.0003279231,0.9093791,0.00011470603,0.00015406398,0.00024711847,0.015515716,0.00024327009,0.0001390036,0.0034388553,0.0048252717,0.0654679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014982766,0.000118137774,0.95434165,0.00023447811,0.00012819639,0.0003938437,0.027301904,0.0005224975,0.00015277119,0.0046588224,0.012102477,0.000030235988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01726969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016963596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01726969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074447575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064169336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034338355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143620987","doi":"10.1017/s0007123402000169","title":"Review Article: Understanding the Regulatory State","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":419,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regulatory state; State (computer science); Political science; Politics; Government (linguistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Subject (documents); Government regulation; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; China; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.06861989147344283,"score_gpt":0.2740634953603053,"score_spread":0.20544360388686245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143620987","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016828744,0.9615782,0.000185534,0.020382065,0.014064899,0.000009114788,0.000042977776,0.000007686159,0.0035612506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030947514,0.96200514,0.00012127377,0.009805074,0.022381037,0.000012197113,0.00007655865,0.0000054967945,0.002498599],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986368,0.00046899702,0.000112505244,0.0002612953,0.00043305053,0.00008731537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947943,0.0028121315,0.0005744135,0.00011104135,0.0013219357,0.00038611662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022187128,0.0011488189,0.0022359884,0.0023542698,0.00089598267,0.0045315623,0.0016679292,0.0084282905,0.011448704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007920785,0.00032153158,0.00044333993,0.005108955,0.0030965907,0.0067842077,0.0011234045,0.0035806359,0.005187451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006569155,0.00004421634,0.0002317725,0.0118873175,0.00006962432,0.00029962303,0.00032444386,0.00041735027,0.00033942334,0.020962501,0.78406864,0.18128933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020257565,0.000041766485,0.00076485344,0.005523386,0.00006142602,0.00063607295,0.0003905217,0.000092486254,0.00009784504,0.009603202,0.98275054,0.000017726465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026574489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032742242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011448704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017823695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004048041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03829974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145631578","doi":"10.1017/s0007123405000220","title":"When Far Apart Becomes Too Far Apart: Evidence for a Threshold Effect in Coalition Formation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Imperfect; Government (linguistics); Structuring; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07822259171328162,"score_gpt":0.40073418096390506,"score_spread":0.32251158925062345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145631578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819849,0.0002480372,0.00971004,0.00038608382,0.000010610261,0.000023755623,0.00011732952,0.00001981152,0.0074993954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927455,0.000030780066,0.0004579324,0.000023745419,0.0000059658782,0.000008939913,0.000046683384,0.000003668922,0.0001477281],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892107,0.004301857,0.00095348165,0.0019782456,0.0024419432,0.0011136199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8037553,0.15203714,0.028136034,0.010050414,0.0020583265,0.0039628614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011162709,0.00019832276,0.00081852265,0.0012932479,0.0015646904,0.0027544627,0.0008947137,0.00096861576,0.0061576883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10079769,0.00037085384,0.0003990512,0.0015736611,0.0051499275,0.004822929,0.0053285193,0.0017049115,0.0003124701],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003977643,0.0006077563,0.6874095,0.00072510383,0.0007645928,0.0006992327,0.034256227,0.012134289,0.009134729,0.13483928,0.001018413,0.11443326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010442716,0.0006679897,0.8512879,0.00009691296,0.00021185953,0.00031787084,0.0109706605,0.008445422,0.003563293,0.119831,0.0043907864,0.00011189913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027017146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038193804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011162709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010742822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009002181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059034765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148578131","doi":"10.1017/s0007123415000368","title":"Unity in Diversity? The Development of Political Parties in the Parliament of Canada, 1867–2011","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; House of Commons; Political science; Incentive; Voting; Consolidation (business); Political economy; Politics; Public administration; Cohesion (chemistry); Commons; Diversity (politics); Economics; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.08685958456956185,"score_gpt":0.331835033292249,"score_spread":0.24497544872268717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148578131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9658243,0.0025215282,0.00026995142,0.0025105863,0.000037301947,0.000035162782,0.0076035466,0.000022071477,0.021175591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927953,0.00046491693,0.00017988583,0.00008663161,0.000013250819,0.00000970994,0.0017737552,0.000011277669,0.0046652653],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966394,0.00027474717,0.00010134351,0.00038779812,0.0009424573,0.0016542786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99384034,0.00058642804,0.0010745077,0.00037850096,0.0030940557,0.0010261965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022861953,0.00018344841,0.000635181,0.0038770812,0.0059560128,0.0036009073,0.0013005653,0.00071691326,0.004624478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008228479,0.00028597805,0.00040980667,0.008884341,0.0025185584,0.00085785403,0.0020420912,0.0012831283,0.0005921264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050623325,0.00006576732,0.78169715,0.00027707565,0.00026657875,0.0003739881,0.057145417,0.0016911689,0.0010679667,0.028806351,0.019985829,0.10811654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066664934,0.000008126507,0.9642405,0.000056105742,0.000019091201,0.00004176568,0.0066244504,0.00042619384,0.00017269529,0.00033231618,0.028045118,0.00002703594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95127016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048729826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041287936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35356128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152786995","doi":"10.1017/s0007123411000238","title":"The New Regionalism and Policy Interdependence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Regionalism (politics); Argument (complex analysis); International trade; International economics; Economics; Competition (biology); Competition policy; Market access; Trade diversion; Economic integration; Political science; International free trade agreement; Geography; Politics; European union","score_opus":0.07247812081627134,"score_gpt":0.24658402408725272,"score_spread":0.17410590327098138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152786995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45610294,0.01134393,0.03628163,0.049203735,0.0002238096,0.000060565322,0.00020362488,0.00009581324,0.44648394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99298346,0.0016586252,0.001090584,0.0009413744,0.000081733095,0.000021770718,0.000026481837,0.000015795182,0.0031801867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99413353,0.0030270068,0.00018084816,0.0010561397,0.00091252604,0.0006899393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944425,0.0023774884,0.0010979464,0.00088415865,0.0006824134,0.00051552575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004285562,0.00015458978,0.0003724844,0.0013949515,0.0012912466,0.004192446,0.0006453767,0.0010957933,0.004164998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006730718,0.00025110634,0.0004176996,0.0018370374,0.01024119,0.0040063015,0.00467885,0.0020654702,0.00027880713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003350653,0.0000141855,0.0051955674,0.0000866664,0.000029315635,0.00010864028,0.00226898,0.002726419,0.0004332638,0.9729301,0.0016128222,0.014560557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049915427,0.0000671642,0.06008784,0.00038656665,0.00006647952,0.00041640506,0.006544599,0.0050514005,0.0006202447,0.680954,0.245707,0.000048388134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033745496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041013528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005500216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005500216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028187127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03990704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170928462","doi":"10.1017/s0007123404220178","title":"Which Matters Most? Comparing the Impact of Issues and the Economy in American, British and Canadian Elections","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Voting; Position (finance); Positive economics; Political science; Democracy; Affect (linguistics); Economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019540387400468366,"score_gpt":0.3411408780964516,"score_spread":0.32160049069598323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170928462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8828348,0.0019427697,0.0003112163,0.005392822,0.00007443647,0.00002938857,0.00030414297,0.000008728801,0.109101705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995928,0.0004035647,0.000038775233,0.00017646953,0.00002507656,0.000003952212,0.000085875465,0.0000051030634,0.0033331453],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99506444,0.0013008536,0.00008936642,0.00018431897,0.0013035175,0.002057544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992732,0.0033504048,0.0008030123,0.00018134652,0.0018479644,0.0010853629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00330756,0.00020995815,0.00066517375,0.0021757383,0.003655542,0.004953532,0.0005978206,0.00075819844,0.008259461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020575473,0.00015047856,0.00046332864,0.0032472657,0.002761709,0.0015372875,0.0018512777,0.0016359214,0.0005215799],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001740632,0.00034250226,0.6729417,0.00030872144,0.00032762712,0.0005541358,0.021090232,0.005438744,0.0010830411,0.19137616,0.012405905,0.092390575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044889817,0.00008144022,0.95097584,0.00005770501,0.00011078331,0.000045270204,0.014220708,0.001431314,0.00026238654,0.00889795,0.023821231,0.000050454615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86243683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93941766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13756317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017431652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009275867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27674657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172010066","doi":"10.1017/s0007123408000318","title":"Cabinet Reshuffles and Ministerial Drift","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Delegation; Public administration; Democracy; Prime minister; Political science; Moral hazard; Work (physics); Agency (philosophy); Law and economics; Political economy; Incentive; Economics; Law; Sociology; Engineering; Politics; Market economy; Social science","score_opus":0.05716686477235682,"score_gpt":0.3888301780727658,"score_spread":0.331663313300409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172010066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42604008,0.0013043035,0.1711877,0.020904671,0.00043924426,0.00027001053,0.00019828748,0.00043205247,0.37922361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766034,0.00017932459,0.0041059204,0.00032731818,0.00008951394,0.00007752195,0.000019310972,0.000032599062,0.01856506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960316,0.0018930724,0.0000842631,0.000523915,0.0005777557,0.00088928425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99381953,0.0027196978,0.0010920358,0.0010357702,0.0003837818,0.00094918173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006130429,0.00043058314,0.00061038166,0.00090550305,0.00234741,0.004201851,0.0018578175,0.0029450506,0.017576495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016568227,0.00036728446,0.0009063528,0.0009699973,0.0071975077,0.005483868,0.0036993534,0.0032052228,0.0012182188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076009186,0.000042936266,0.0004759104,0.000020200388,0.000004992738,0.00008443609,0.0007966892,0.0126497345,0.00024154982,0.97845185,0.00085041503,0.006305237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016512888,0.00012548549,0.0015897132,0.000037904665,0.000014046987,0.00013271047,0.0010191867,0.04771632,0.00040211497,0.92823917,0.020518485,0.000039800045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028870597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017522457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017576495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043068267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002389694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058799207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775364846","doi":"10.1017/s0007123417000667","title":"For and Against Brexit: A Survey Experiment of the Impact of Campaign Effects on Public Attitudes toward EU Membership","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Kent; London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Referendum; Brexit; Salience (neuroscience); Framing (construction); European union; Political science; Public opinion; Panel survey; Panel data; Public support; Member states; Economics; International economics; Public relations; Demographic economics; Psychology; Engineering; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.10831854998605962,"score_gpt":0.4238999545182734,"score_spread":0.3155814045322138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775364846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941964,0.000020523092,0.00075676525,0.00023737772,0.000049261642,0.00050302106,0.0001549038,0.000013897747,0.004067785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907799,0.000055116536,0.0023497269,0.00048814045,0.000064293694,0.0019400513,0.00018370812,0.000014878294,0.004124304],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931999,0.0051705386,0.00027746454,0.0005690226,0.00041892662,0.00036424512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92076665,0.06767411,0.0051687816,0.003994102,0.0011195686,0.0012767379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011376314,0.0005276099,0.0007007579,0.00029507917,0.0010980975,0.00197432,0.0006999139,0.0022575324,0.0117886085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033105694,0.000639518,0.00045358785,0.00038111437,0.0016048737,0.0016288706,0.001342351,0.0025860784,0.0017370665],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.13656412,0.35442814,0.15312716,0.0027148835,0.0017447666,0.0008793533,0.07500135,0.00791559,0.060392044,0.0253544,0.009374659,0.17250353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.042794622,0.34276232,0.4645479,0.00042626355,0.0020397457,0.00040210146,0.023912953,0.028100383,0.034564286,0.026000101,0.03374251,0.00070679514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015575027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014645152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0117886085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066983514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060164392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799294677","doi":"10.1017/s0007123418000236","title":"Do Voters Benchmark Economic Performance?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmark (surveying); Computer science; Content (measure theory); Geography; Mathematics; Cartography","score_opus":0.019179745485125757,"score_gpt":0.3193083145580545,"score_spread":0.30012856907292873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799294677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8554161,0.0017871953,0.0008012629,0.010969994,0.0002919586,0.000053966152,0.0019828612,0.000037515187,0.1286592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972594,0.00014176453,0.000066063134,0.00017905595,0.00008114451,0.000017365037,0.00038977398,0.000010437854,0.0018549506],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99282277,0.00402037,0.0003433044,0.00044873246,0.001027881,0.0013368689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97951114,0.008793709,0.0057549155,0.0010677247,0.0028271158,0.0020452305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008743664,0.00038344163,0.0008479009,0.0026000822,0.0006467584,0.004696682,0.00045607108,0.001193808,0.014491249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05803551,0.0002033306,0.00032879642,0.0026367917,0.0013956558,0.002685725,0.0016206154,0.0011079815,0.0033096657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003701034,0.00038612835,0.8183016,0.00022341321,0.0005085227,0.00015106186,0.0026630384,0.0024756843,0.00030146967,0.049132705,0.024439184,0.097716175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024338011,0.00095386367,0.92469597,0.00027498635,0.00017038993,0.00012355165,0.007204245,0.003433742,0.0007150141,0.03438097,0.027728874,0.00007510127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037760593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003905495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014491249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014008385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076903054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048478067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810451199","doi":"10.1017/s0007123417000606","title":"Tones from a Narrowing Race: Polling and Online Political Communication during the 2014 Scottish Referendum Campaign","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Polling; Politics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Democracy; Independence (probability theory); Political communication; General election; Media studies; Political economy; Advertising; Sociology; Law; Geography; Business; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.028527672365760096,"score_gpt":0.3414500811412588,"score_spread":0.3129224087754987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810451199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952187,0.000042985444,0.000051343417,0.00035588857,0.00001816364,0.000005416038,0.00014046546,0.0000050241247,0.004162019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998406,0.000043682223,0.000050432274,0.00013743446,0.000035919715,0.0000066524494,0.00018012123,0.0000058829564,0.0011338906],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909365,0.00026687095,0.000039849507,0.00010088441,0.00030378668,0.00019488066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99444664,0.002323714,0.0015763866,0.00031621833,0.00076472346,0.00057227537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016127487,0.00017039607,0.00032499185,0.0011453556,0.0015769731,0.002343392,0.0003425667,0.00079962786,0.004302992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008371593,0.00017576854,0.00018801582,0.0011360553,0.0010544127,0.0013726609,0.0014590159,0.0008672584,0.00083930034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009041519,0.0003245825,0.81091225,0.00013124247,0.0001307505,0.0008905779,0.12941241,0.0002616658,0.0044685956,0.0017896648,0.0076861586,0.043087903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005695151,0.000068958965,0.9659453,0.00003290044,0.000023240302,0.000055953416,0.028260557,0.0003370647,0.00024421743,0.00017954134,0.0048246137,0.00002186089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033047087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07787817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033047087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009875341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053969305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06570947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890816858","doi":"10.1017/s0007123408000306","title":"How's Your Government? International Evidence Linking Good Government and Well-Being","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Trustworthiness; World Values Survey; Hierarchy; Good governance; Public economics; Per capita; Corporate governance; Value (mathematics); Balance (ability); Quality (philosophy); Business; Democracy; Economics; Life satisfaction; Politics; Political science; Finance; Psychology","score_opus":0.03761590881104149,"score_gpt":0.24903461516845743,"score_spread":0.21141870635741594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890816858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8705102,0.03650863,0.0010889977,0.019231506,0.00038602136,0.000018765246,0.0022346326,0.000015019686,0.070006244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899831,0.007854623,0.00017775883,0.00053277763,0.00015694495,0.0000054288585,0.00064078433,0.000007916136,0.00064053445],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983026,0.00093570683,0.00014548685,0.00022447156,0.00019698792,0.00019466417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9557225,0.024236152,0.012664706,0.002441718,0.003190002,0.0017449264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004161495,0.00022557222,0.00033492647,0.0020557628,0.00052725524,0.001683388,0.00037274323,0.0006625948,0.009371482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022651,0.00017074168,0.00038450534,0.0058329585,0.0023765517,0.0009898405,0.0012314129,0.0010361169,0.0009372471],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004902835,0.00013238961,0.9222405,0.00061865675,0.0007944414,0.00017366823,0.0024599384,0.0005097947,0.000107533284,0.01040816,0.0056173657,0.05644735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015005743,0.00011371603,0.98112327,0.00045081179,0.00024067372,0.0002126295,0.0034868377,0.00013118665,0.00009959113,0.0031211935,0.010989786,0.00001526605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006033599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073458096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009371482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004099397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035163682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03135073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907118461","doi":"10.1017/s0007123418000303","title":"Compulsory Voting: A Defence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Voting; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Coercion (linguistics); Presidential system; Political economy; Margin (machine learning); Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05815346936181888,"score_gpt":0.36522076396790865,"score_spread":0.3070672946060898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907118461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050484482,0.004568291,0.042407293,0.3119725,0.0049134484,0.00018614742,0.00018765517,0.00011908766,0.5851611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8675281,0.0012346673,0.0072208764,0.070468344,0.0034112222,0.00030789812,0.000065295615,0.00011528136,0.04964831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98532516,0.005954427,0.000568871,0.0021024765,0.004742792,0.0013062869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95739985,0.027761437,0.002685287,0.005869985,0.0049356204,0.0013478978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020284945,0.000492838,0.001159386,0.0014489589,0.004826514,0.0066725365,0.003142452,0.011109927,0.0062546525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048920173,0.0003746815,0.001095617,0.0013339072,0.02495857,0.0054668915,0.005339122,0.02043199,0.0016556311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018087221,0.0000110696,0.00034114093,0.000031456024,0.000008956625,0.000049563878,0.0007664512,0.00007617867,0.00007452244,0.9876736,0.0060070525,0.0049419827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008214983,0.00007425378,0.001073619,0.0006329323,0.00003833278,0.00023584934,0.00091636064,0.001045219,0.0008649772,0.8219577,0.17304005,0.000038516144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048174574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004052155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020284945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003174084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042500524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10727835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908267360","doi":"10.1017/s000712341800042x","title":"Are Transfer-Dependent Governments More Creditworthy? Reassessing the Fiscal Federal Foundations of Subnational Default Risk","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Bailout; Transfer payment; Economics; Probability of default; Revenue; Payment; Business; Financial system; Monetary economics; Finance; Credit risk; Macroeconomics; Financial crisis; Market economy","score_opus":0.024679423093557713,"score_gpt":0.3305317794635554,"score_spread":0.3058523563699977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908267360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9181063,0.0022646112,0.0038750838,0.036332205,0.000060072412,0.000012474251,0.00014358302,0.000023808945,0.03918187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933296,0.00017282441,0.00006430677,0.00017471841,0.00003140413,0.0000011566478,0.0000069147686,0.0000015669335,0.0002140364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881953,0.00047512603,0.000058938604,0.00015152205,0.00019190181,0.0003029087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810837,0.009248119,0.0059466804,0.0012406405,0.0013159327,0.0011649239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044643856,0.00006601443,0.00040533277,0.0013645113,0.0008819679,0.003176126,0.0005269176,0.0012046116,0.0057469187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021409167,0.00011364001,0.00024297625,0.001470831,0.0049814777,0.004001878,0.0017692955,0.0021417353,0.00015409043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048020712,0.00011431542,0.20682722,0.00013728792,0.000086658925,0.00047940906,0.0036356852,0.005083875,0.00044427003,0.70894563,0.0061628507,0.06760253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077433455,0.000121414785,0.3835809,0.0003809925,0.00010407862,0.00033647672,0.008290342,0.011743858,0.00057439023,0.57935065,0.015378267,0.000061231425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009707083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008570829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009707083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003101604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013188702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023610234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975499287","doi":"10.1017/s0007123419000231","title":"Stuck in the middle: Ideology, valence and the electoral failures of centrist parties","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Political science; Political economy; Voting; Politics; Democracy; German; Economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.032400995178615714,"score_gpt":0.32481556705902986,"score_spread":0.29241457188041414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975499287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99083143,0.00004246971,0.0004989411,0.00017816364,0.000005270559,0.0000035340413,0.000011606035,0.0000031180132,0.008425456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99977356,0.000008025498,0.000026756481,0.0000063052357,0.0000020833309,8.7789874e-7,0.0000049667483,9.604728e-7,0.00017645542],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899393,0.00044978282,0.000028760565,0.000078425976,0.00013659235,0.00031249668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942807,0.0028553223,0.0013060619,0.00032211034,0.00036407044,0.0008717032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026585928,0.00012551153,0.00035555454,0.0010284705,0.0015966181,0.003699239,0.0003498988,0.00072851294,0.006309531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009434881,0.00015559702,0.0002026578,0.0007790182,0.0031616224,0.0013351286,0.0021816844,0.0007215232,0.00039149856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003701119,0.00064917246,0.6016466,0.00015454086,0.00027572256,0.0010954195,0.01857381,0.01965363,0.005593175,0.28047162,0.0036699888,0.06451525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028209173,0.0010263155,0.7039286,0.00013006816,0.00013292603,0.0003996669,0.056824494,0.0378142,0.0028192496,0.18782717,0.008709192,0.00010603914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021286428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00231555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006309531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012563857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043960148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021107495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977839676","doi":"10.1017/s0007123419000127","title":"Voters Punish Politicians with Depression","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Depression (economics); Political science; Internet privacy; Business; Psychology; Computer security; Computer science; Law and economics; Economics; Mathematics; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.01101432091072875,"score_gpt":0.3141470751231363,"score_spread":0.30313275421240754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977839676","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18493941,0.004648055,0.0011756113,0.42727092,0.011721857,0.0001431875,0.0003903142,0.0001669408,0.3695437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8727579,0.0011663879,0.00035666782,0.06554251,0.0023989112,0.00006130776,0.00012580698,0.000061809755,0.057528738],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959377,0.0017554313,0.00010287923,0.00019587146,0.00070706755,0.001300898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936406,0.0023248715,0.00087170384,0.00028759125,0.000902652,0.0019726695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038612336,0.0002517459,0.00043391803,0.00057013554,0.00384908,0.002661705,0.00044545232,0.0035968893,0.025885731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027013632,0.00022970547,0.0003689037,0.00047569512,0.001722213,0.00087271637,0.0019101087,0.0043768724,0.005931691],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012851196,0.00029196485,0.03729264,0.00017419276,0.000113174625,0.0008351004,0.0021123628,0.0002622535,0.0008750275,0.058771476,0.80184907,0.09613751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011167433,0.0008476021,0.11371693,0.00073482154,0.00030521664,0.0011453149,0.012133875,0.0027186975,0.0030702495,0.05351579,0.81060433,0.00009047514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057705343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011261798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025885731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015619113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023278254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08659637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981363627","doi":"10.1017/s0007123419000462","title":"Does Electing Extremist Parties Increase Violence and Intolerance?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer security; Internet privacy; Content (measure theory); Business; Political science; Computer science; Criminology; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009307994396940703,"score_gpt":0.2882361888342629,"score_spread":0.2789281944373222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981363627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98355293,0.0009110436,0.000083134284,0.0050859232,0.00014414829,0.0000068879244,0.00022213373,0.000006608322,0.009987108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99850595,0.0002772799,0.000032420692,0.00021184824,0.00015156507,0.0000037135624,0.00010343009,0.0000031726363,0.00071079173],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814403,0.0009062995,0.00009108758,0.00017750483,0.00018608982,0.0004949402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98713094,0.0044462886,0.004940158,0.0007152081,0.00032614343,0.0024412519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013964043,0.00016763339,0.000473113,0.00094348035,0.0008247732,0.0023794882,0.00040164773,0.002106479,0.021445885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015452638,0.00031942886,0.0006523121,0.0011662791,0.0008532945,0.00078020757,0.000986691,0.0015359086,0.0010854588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008103468,0.0005283261,0.9792419,0.00005621741,0.00030411402,0.0002928409,0.00048495102,0.000097791744,0.0001488651,0.001063448,0.0017357714,0.0152355665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020155598,0.00014128891,0.99669856,0.00003438891,0.00007959979,0.00017877854,0.0010450545,0.00011943431,0.000049977913,0.0008246856,0.00080121955,0.000006870742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025312582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037172702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021445885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031065612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040417176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07174367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000159853","doi":"10.1017/s0007123419000644","title":"The Cultural Sources of the Gender Gap in Voter Turnout","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Tampereen Yliopisto","keywords":"Parliament; Gender gap; Turnout; Voting; Voter turnout; Context (archaeology); Political science; Politics; Demographic economics; Economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.06059909287288986,"score_gpt":0.3437625384576921,"score_spread":0.2831634455848023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000159853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894454,0.000513151,0.00022805874,0.00030740973,0.000021494237,0.0000046886094,0.0002178097,0.0000035127248,0.009258624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995427,0.0000488137,0.000020471341,0.000015835478,0.000005421552,0.0000014519989,0.000041398664,0.0000022889726,0.000321578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904114,0.0003945987,0.000032946507,0.0001776564,0.00013413047,0.00021954632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99599886,0.0018464932,0.0009472903,0.0003373338,0.00043899028,0.0004311042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013849259,0.00011501396,0.00021940711,0.0008710315,0.00041312448,0.00094178825,0.00031082527,0.00027920082,0.007454763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006333056,0.000111218906,0.00016981977,0.0007799281,0.0007047195,0.00042025503,0.00083391933,0.00041027516,0.00061805977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000721646,0.00013190252,0.94307685,0.0000820392,0.00013369926,0.00035769268,0.012917354,0.0002482362,0.0024312572,0.0072869794,0.0010808397,0.03153158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052176842,0.00003664962,0.99224925,0.000022075046,0.000013479646,0.00007783893,0.004609089,0.00012332886,0.00044983067,0.0009564077,0.0014514067,0.0000054232983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004021792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005672293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007454763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000399707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025446675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024938643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001418019","doi":"10.1017/s0007123420000113","title":"Party Cues in the News: Democratic Elites, Republican Backlash, and the Dynamics of Climate Skepticism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Elite; Public opinion; Climate change; Political science; Democracy; Construct (python library); Backlash; Dynamics (music); Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15063448832319962,"score_gpt":0.39569718074988997,"score_spread":0.24506269242669035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001418019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893498,0.00020396737,0.00026635284,0.0007361936,0.000037571965,0.0000071356158,0.00008691344,0.00000873988,0.0093032885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993104,0.00008835516,0.00007384406,0.00012976669,0.00004512193,0.0000037258342,0.00004840503,0.0000059099784,0.00029446103],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998497,0.00062325795,0.000108757515,0.00018886187,0.0003873801,0.00019478325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724047,0.014603502,0.009305764,0.0011650074,0.0016676362,0.00085334573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002256799,0.00018477415,0.00028481786,0.0014284538,0.0013712425,0.004020177,0.00025504924,0.0009878122,0.0036716405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021856252,0.00024142975,0.00017803263,0.0013858257,0.0012786272,0.0019633623,0.0016297083,0.0013317689,0.00039457166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019292829,0.00033969485,0.84115916,0.00031600115,0.00025421838,0.00060291385,0.06551341,0.0005861569,0.009015231,0.0051690964,0.003966448,0.071148425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028243112,0.00016355971,0.9620465,0.00008471232,0.000081928294,0.00014720802,0.027025772,0.0010346819,0.0012126504,0.002075983,0.006034962,0.00006388863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00414348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005332759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00414348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008740412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036440138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012282908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008344500","doi":"10.1017/s0007123419000632","title":"Primaries Through the Looking Glass: The Electoral Effects of Opening the Selection of Top Candidates","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Primary election; Politics; Political science; General election; Positive economics; Economics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.023547724813362682,"score_gpt":0.330253372151148,"score_spread":0.30670564733778527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008344500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9837081,0.00016124571,0.0005083879,0.00038162307,0.000025117453,0.000016988643,0.000049849987,0.000019333336,0.015129479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991153,0.000027041904,0.00009666934,0.0000264824,0.000013324951,0.0000028909965,0.000015824451,0.000005703592,0.0006966272],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977704,0.0009611476,0.00009445131,0.00018965689,0.0004014083,0.0005829033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96181357,0.025822066,0.0057059815,0.0019893092,0.0008522929,0.003816748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003890914,0.00015925989,0.0006866123,0.001191558,0.0016302863,0.0025061688,0.00049142947,0.0006695068,0.02120003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03491765,0.00026577886,0.00050208037,0.0007855166,0.002511995,0.0008649539,0.0025472064,0.001139788,0.0009519954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012974697,0.0019770865,0.7801367,0.00043388832,0.00031654027,0.0018397892,0.0069370605,0.0026820162,0.01934827,0.03675288,0.003976009,0.13262513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001561082,0.0011572446,0.97523785,0.000056539397,0.00013549728,0.00021861012,0.0032296774,0.0012910784,0.0021184378,0.012966002,0.0033967197,0.000036335536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045601013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02120003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007178109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006387472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07092118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012475823","doi":"10.1017/s0007123419000589","title":"Material Interests, Identity and Linked Fate in Three Countries","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bridge (graph theory); Identity (music); Social psychology; Politics; Ethnic group; Social identity theory; Cognition; Collective identity; Social identity approach; Psychology; Observational study; Religious identity; Social group; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04670030608121272,"score_gpt":0.3248662557795621,"score_spread":0.27816594969834935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012475823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99569976,0.000030004232,0.00008773871,0.00004748557,0.0000018235204,0.000005271441,0.00001743039,7.109065e-7,0.004109922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998337,0.00001596638,0.000030077359,0.0000072448975,4.6256415e-7,0.000002347901,0.000011253191,2.0806594e-7,0.00009874353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990753,0.0005534072,0.00003206168,0.000068300535,0.00007820531,0.00019268073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967451,0.0013086174,0.001002435,0.0002272419,0.0002940148,0.00042261466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018830559,0.00014655659,0.0002242179,0.0015946673,0.0021813947,0.0030103948,0.00028702096,0.00051849196,0.0033491736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003696876,0.00014245114,0.00022637524,0.0015545934,0.0044787433,0.001210721,0.00327567,0.00085943687,0.00015576981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090332347,0.0015524733,0.82215416,0.00010156546,0.00014129748,0.001123634,0.07244577,0.0025309194,0.0013155862,0.07613446,0.00043842752,0.021158468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009741951,0.0006066712,0.7829776,0.00011957485,0.000068566595,0.00029211937,0.18864872,0.0018129888,0.0013044311,0.018740369,0.0052642194,0.000067307636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00651748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059332484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00651748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014865488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046418695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012959063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038826502","doi":"10.1017/s0007123420000071","title":"Addressing Monotone Likelihood in Duration Modelling of Political Events","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Covariate; Duration (music); Monotone polygon; Econometrics; Monotonic function; Maximum likelihood; Accelerated failure time model; Mathematics; Exposition (narrative); Statistics; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.13255069610412182,"score_gpt":0.38279499767642106,"score_spread":0.25024430157229927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038826502","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033855297,0.00036346502,0.96125686,0.0015038047,0.000045942754,0.00007563923,0.00013466983,0.00008172789,0.0026826349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.883395,0.0006583102,0.10946459,0.00036934495,0.00022312312,0.00041469422,0.00025206772,0.00011241291,0.005110285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858925,0.011297094,0.00039769142,0.0009993394,0.0008167545,0.0005967212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81942767,0.16798368,0.0067742723,0.0029684182,0.0019987144,0.0008473007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0331267,0.0007500041,0.0019451012,0.0011818468,0.0008324641,0.0032139705,0.0030274333,0.0025374987,0.005671145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1413277,0.0009936871,0.0013691963,0.0013282842,0.0038255446,0.0041443165,0.0045683854,0.004081515,0.00036937374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001091912,0.000050250874,0.00887924,0.00020369797,0.000111980975,0.0003592402,0.0013002984,0.32141536,0.00040295007,0.6423503,0.00096658315,0.023850955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021556858,0.000060569662,0.0011342767,0.000065545224,0.000027186723,0.000094553405,0.00012479824,0.69487995,0.00019393292,0.30174246,0.0016221539,0.000032999407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072271884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044533936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0331267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023506114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019875292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17519283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135408956","doi":"10.1017/s0007123420000721","title":"Do Investor–State Disputes (Still) Harm FDI?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Harm; Foreign direct investment; Business; State (computer science); Investment (military); International investment; Monetary economics; Investor protection; International economics; Economics; Market economy; Law; Corporate governance; Political science; Finance; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.019405977328806494,"score_gpt":0.25832776030522114,"score_spread":0.23892178297641464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135408956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76104265,0.006905431,0.0026802407,0.036608223,0.00019334962,0.0000296141,0.0004986719,0.000038903625,0.19200297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945827,0.0008516824,0.00009690714,0.0011020895,0.00009829221,0.0000056482995,0.00007813866,0.000004297024,0.0031801776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939867,0.0019095957,0.000521824,0.00058294274,0.0018802143,0.0011186113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94622487,0.02702988,0.017331157,0.00399687,0.0045428206,0.00087431725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008467365,0.00013542171,0.0004510571,0.0018392167,0.0027321046,0.006712219,0.0008158956,0.0042306897,0.0074786902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045620415,0.00018134217,0.0005138852,0.0029563745,0.005037184,0.008164129,0.0025753654,0.0041498505,0.00064339826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002974956,0.00034467338,0.36363,0.00042399636,0.00014678398,0.0019011913,0.022370229,0.003494904,0.0013456686,0.468063,0.02171833,0.116263725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000748524,0.00036497865,0.45339456,0.0017018053,0.00020981138,0.0030747447,0.06269431,0.009467005,0.0060971226,0.2894398,0.17328136,0.00019971885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009665705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0086586345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009665705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034846908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017178481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044780195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135669602","doi":"10.1017/s0007123420000757","title":"Incumbents Beware: The Impact of Offshoring on Elections","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"New York University Abu Dhabi; Harvard University; University of Oxford; York University; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; Yale University","keywords":"Offshoring; Globalization; Government (linguistics); Politics; Democracy; Production (economics); Business; Political economy; Economics; Market economy; Political science; Marketing; Law; Outsourcing; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.028476333229542825,"score_gpt":0.3661992779293446,"score_spread":0.33772294469980174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135669602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94426954,0.0002173791,0.0005554248,0.0015752133,0.00006822554,0.00002611149,0.0001240473,0.000009640029,0.053154554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986779,0.000026398075,0.000028867713,0.000092181224,0.000019333494,0.0000035616913,0.000021615313,0.0000031485788,0.0011271093],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922931,0.0041052788,0.00022019872,0.00048286738,0.0008725131,0.002025952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96268845,0.023342924,0.007554952,0.0019226068,0.002056167,0.0024349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049970374,0.00012712083,0.000470581,0.00056449015,0.0015278676,0.0028618127,0.00039612234,0.0008156508,0.008862312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036082167,0.00016105456,0.0003988932,0.00075708586,0.0015267368,0.0008817864,0.0014695597,0.0016110828,0.0007118145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017323921,0.00073580816,0.8816586,0.00010629386,0.00018784315,0.0005286471,0.005823035,0.0034656087,0.0012051146,0.026895227,0.0064452966,0.0712162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040493273,0.00036016956,0.98198676,0.00002690933,0.000070856695,0.00007242828,0.0050610686,0.0019431529,0.00055763894,0.0041480362,0.005711034,0.000021500075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00636109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010491215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008862312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013495055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005801174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02964741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204177307","doi":"10.1017/s0007123421000405","title":"Global Capital Cycles and Market Discipline: Perceptions of Developing-Country Borrowers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Global Financial Crisis and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Market liquidity; Capital market; Conditionality; Bond market; Developing country; Financial market; Bond; Business; Debt; Financial system; Emerging markets; Monetary economics; International economics; Economics; Finance; Politics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.010754503575440845,"score_gpt":0.25672403006490446,"score_spread":0.24596952648946363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204177307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973832,0.00013394939,0.00003709838,0.00035542727,0.0000046780715,0.0000072201206,0.000036316284,8.338534e-7,0.0020414018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995171,0.00014478965,0.000017906394,0.000069969974,0.000006055693,0.000003461613,0.000020049141,6.189325e-7,0.00021997919],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948406,0.00023812575,0.00003448949,0.000037441274,0.00009473849,0.00011121098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939709,0.0016363342,0.0026805096,0.00015082807,0.0004762699,0.0010852916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020405254,0.00015651723,0.00024317094,0.0010994441,0.0006461811,0.0019569322,0.0001982755,0.0005650295,0.0039684777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055472916,0.000121131954,0.00017157204,0.0009801987,0.0013914721,0.0013322491,0.0012508592,0.0009434389,0.00019119108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017639984,0.00013733815,0.8894746,0.00007194739,0.00005082399,0.0002890339,0.094016396,0.00021644437,0.00081472157,0.0016706005,0.00082893466,0.012252654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013960507,0.00015742429,0.7927366,0.00008484017,0.000019708657,0.00015662478,0.20017749,0.00044482076,0.00020887435,0.0009772027,0.0049910727,0.000031311665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00568253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004809906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00568253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059661706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003050757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013275862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200118932","doi":"10.1017/s0007123421000557","title":"Phantom Pains: The Effect of Police Killings of Black Americans on Black British Attitudes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Diaspora; Politics; Metropolitan area; White (mutation); Political science; Race (biology); Gender studies; Racial politics; Sociology; History; Law","score_opus":0.031897834475311915,"score_gpt":0.38067847328936505,"score_spread":0.34878063881405313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200118932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954365,0.000075816526,0.000025228888,0.0006701683,0.00001769628,0.000004528742,0.000047759913,0.000002388048,0.0037198833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986488,0.000048565504,0.000017558592,0.00009062387,0.000008967435,0.000006357002,0.000021901402,0.0000015637357,0.0011557596],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974503,0.0015749702,0.000055777236,0.00013764955,0.00037094735,0.00041034902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98652136,0.005208325,0.0040503857,0.0005489987,0.0011964756,0.0024745127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001594905,0.00017154128,0.00028309334,0.0005645983,0.0015598373,0.001518584,0.00037833085,0.0006591955,0.009698698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013419502,0.00016105486,0.000409353,0.00050101976,0.001302661,0.00049715635,0.0012726731,0.0014702205,0.000580103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011467524,0.0009735016,0.9604096,0.00004669818,0.0002738024,0.00014585396,0.0128965,0.00022877681,0.00078235584,0.0010295492,0.0023092467,0.01975745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014621794,0.00027334478,0.9844967,0.00002945827,0.00006357636,0.0000175975,0.013639961,0.00014728839,0.00015065074,0.00016484274,0.0009915075,0.000010535782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11743198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14338204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11743198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014358623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011353598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23349696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284880057","doi":"10.1017/s0007123422000266","title":"The Politics of Intersecting Crises: The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Climate Policy Preferences","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"University of California, Santa Barbara; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Climate change; Framing (construction); Pandemic; Public policy; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Politics; Government (linguistics); Complementarity (molecular biology); Public opinion; Political economy; Development economics; Economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Geography; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.29535337135436207,"score_gpt":0.48022172727738527,"score_spread":0.1848683559230232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284880057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9563412,0.00013384462,0.0003934584,0.0023480598,0.000026523221,0.000037681784,0.00008161014,0.0000066671387,0.040630944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993376,0.00004281589,0.000078252546,0.00015969762,0.000004812132,0.000008039507,0.000010294067,0.0000015181229,0.00035706203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939611,0.0038279006,0.00008471916,0.00030922613,0.00081497827,0.0010021565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811514,0.012854976,0.0024907095,0.0010637074,0.0011596541,0.0012794867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00745783,0.00023629931,0.00040464135,0.0006349331,0.0029357614,0.0040789964,0.00051837706,0.0014905751,0.010105558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020577855,0.00026175173,0.00035715802,0.00092946464,0.0046237605,0.0014052673,0.0019142238,0.0024512704,0.000303141],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009752343,0.004360556,0.44578275,0.00074929517,0.00055473257,0.0010416614,0.20585161,0.01117358,0.016695224,0.17379294,0.0149520915,0.115293235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000711243,0.0014225912,0.5879839,0.0002930564,0.00043286028,0.00015168083,0.3133759,0.010299744,0.003888245,0.048769124,0.032347485,0.00032416213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17532669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15988047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17532669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00865397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003673125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34861237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293086800","doi":"10.1017/s0007123422000023","title":"Political Understanding","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Politics; Ignorance; Democracy; Narrative; Political science; Citizen journalism; Public opinion; Epistemology; Participatory democracy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.07141111241041545,"score_gpt":0.3573488681750634,"score_spread":0.28593775576464797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293086800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053275853,0.00096967863,0.012480422,0.05277004,0.0004952837,0.00006732938,0.00025757495,0.00007109,0.87961274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718859,0.0005974587,0.0014724095,0.0040115477,0.00018882821,0.000054291995,0.00020961024,0.00005231772,0.021527529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850566,0.008298935,0.00049084955,0.0010281855,0.0039579603,0.0011675772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748883,0.013569269,0.0029799829,0.0031179243,0.0043928875,0.0010515738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008311788,0.00040386058,0.00045094424,0.0016710486,0.0045265323,0.009704713,0.000916597,0.0037664066,0.022140373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031636134,0.00022124525,0.00041445263,0.0012005178,0.01175845,0.008955932,0.004873049,0.0053672483,0.0026219361],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022431568,0.00001651327,0.0017933879,0.00008638756,0.000008461885,0.00012475556,0.05008512,0.00019940827,0.00023146768,0.9234552,0.0126309665,0.0113459425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011741539,0.000036115714,0.0026273404,0.00040794848,0.000020372929,0.00029889675,0.04320604,0.00084431405,0.00040795666,0.4601414,0.49197125,0.000026607975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00227832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012048263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022140373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004154768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023003565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07406694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367298058","doi":"10.1017/s0007123423000054","title":"Freeing People; Restricting Capital","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Presumption; Capital (architecture); Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Economics; Movement (music); Human capital; Market economy; Political economy; Labour economics; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.04819308209312657,"score_gpt":0.35592723595740733,"score_spread":0.30773415386428077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367298058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084678605,0.0028448666,0.04878678,0.063105695,0.0007693364,0.00010957195,0.00016843122,0.00009731145,0.7994393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96979576,0.00056293106,0.0031450547,0.006389606,0.00023932636,0.0001471525,0.00002849696,0.000035258145,0.019656463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99401313,0.0029004817,0.00021986026,0.0010875245,0.0009338355,0.000845137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951369,0.0022046177,0.0007351095,0.00101926,0.00043624526,0.00046783808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005288275,0.00045078737,0.00057590957,0.0011646149,0.0034286021,0.0055310507,0.0011642122,0.0047194124,0.00946864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009482793,0.00028324398,0.00060589204,0.00064604654,0.02918225,0.0067552454,0.00749483,0.0049171224,0.00086693617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011480297,0.000008025209,0.000118661526,0.000014241046,0.000004220845,0.000026842617,0.00044775815,0.00024996474,0.00008944367,0.9964888,0.00087170664,0.0016687479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029367846,0.000023852745,0.00030139115,0.00011904078,0.0000117599675,0.00004604416,0.0005353907,0.0005989913,0.00036074754,0.9593674,0.038586307,0.00001957683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004852492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032801116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00946864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003254919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031029726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031675756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381734902","doi":"10.1017/s0007123423000133","title":"A Drop in the Ocean: How Priors Anchor Attitudes Toward the American Carceral State","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of North Carolina at Greensboro; Vanderbilt University; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Subordination (linguistics); Prison; Socialization; White (mutation); Social psychology; State (computer science); Politics; Racial hierarchy; Psychology; Sociology; Race (biology); Gender studies; Criminology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05277758094611997,"score_gpt":0.38222455459283083,"score_spread":0.3294469736467109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381734902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914995,0.0000723295,0.0006992911,0.00034297357,0.0000076607585,0.000004246219,0.000066224944,0.000007705527,0.007300024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995197,0.00003095487,0.00013196727,0.000034930115,0.0000032812104,0.0000019177423,0.00004981179,0.000004391503,0.00022298627],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899703,0.0005245841,0.000032986143,0.00014014331,0.00020985524,0.00009542908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98740935,0.007439763,0.002333941,0.0006714676,0.0013455338,0.0007999658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021927413,0.00013860162,0.00024054239,0.0011827846,0.00063786446,0.003533293,0.00028504684,0.00080162624,0.006197182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02107546,0.00030270257,0.00014262102,0.0008527917,0.0015162929,0.0017916613,0.0012417365,0.001273193,0.00054019765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005622504,0.00018563085,0.90433735,0.00007244245,0.000110959474,0.00017819135,0.036328264,0.000733765,0.003849045,0.007040161,0.0011612826,0.045440637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012480621,0.00012508224,0.9690122,0.00007968822,0.000051714458,0.000063275525,0.019626724,0.0023103426,0.0007008918,0.005702379,0.0022720373,0.000043105574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010625885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013658384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010625885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006233981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003412106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021128118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386120544","doi":"10.1017/s0007123423000376","title":"Does Protest Influence Political Speech? Evidence from UK Climate Protest, 2017–2019","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"University of Edinburgh","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Affect (linguistics); Period (music); Work (physics); Political economy; Sociology; Law; Communication","score_opus":0.03840723225993982,"score_gpt":0.36767349282356887,"score_spread":0.32926626056362907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386120544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97332156,0.001308863,0.00025788837,0.0053384597,0.00021998574,0.000028787847,0.0046878397,0.000015308427,0.014821287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949786,0.000515988,0.00006836176,0.00046746552,0.000105662875,0.0000389654,0.0014529644,0.000028688188,0.0023432623],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99526995,0.00203977,0.00039760894,0.0007017596,0.0008163846,0.00077452464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95706546,0.019793328,0.013382502,0.0023368963,0.0047617066,0.002660101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003470717,0.0002465655,0.0003797924,0.0019437529,0.0011900126,0.0032309669,0.0004205341,0.0012582876,0.011325206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029661478,0.00041043968,0.00037571896,0.003048603,0.0015624053,0.0019318617,0.0033348459,0.001577779,0.0035253726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008391746,0.0002571295,0.90341747,0.0005329201,0.00027182128,0.00074556354,0.03890617,0.00029729624,0.0006637319,0.0020729322,0.022512142,0.029483601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016585664,0.000079146674,0.9659099,0.00020959236,0.00004582362,0.00007950693,0.017862882,0.00021497621,0.00017587093,0.0002933835,0.015077235,0.000035112284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042651143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063365795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042651143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014126827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001040209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08480579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386603356","doi":"10.1017/s0007123423000339","title":"Social Pressure in the International Human Rights Regime: Why States Withdraw Treaty Reservations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Colorado Boulder; Arizona State University; Concordia University; Harvard University","keywords":"Treaty; Reservation; Human rights; Political science; Work (physics); International community; Object (grammar); Law and economics; Law; International law; International human rights law; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.03759608299158239,"score_gpt":0.3656243464414452,"score_spread":0.3280282634498628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386603356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95582324,0.00021777171,0.00088729046,0.005341428,0.00004451064,0.000033023447,0.000083645355,0.000013837021,0.0375552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833965,0.000049298902,0.00009241958,0.00044139338,0.000019825166,0.000020075508,0.000023254042,0.0000052255295,0.0010087261],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899266,0.0051002554,0.00057482865,0.0006150911,0.0018607547,0.0019225697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96016455,0.021403238,0.0114910165,0.0017698931,0.003239061,0.0019323376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076178997,0.00009834311,0.0003281901,0.0010528628,0.00294739,0.003461612,0.000592477,0.001336926,0.006938707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042711865,0.00019660735,0.00024132963,0.0015154681,0.003632226,0.0020440968,0.003334062,0.0029890311,0.0003497702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051661296,0.00043979552,0.5503512,0.00031751505,0.00015882985,0.0012849958,0.11687766,0.0011685122,0.0035292525,0.23816407,0.017105997,0.0700856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084170446,0.0002181398,0.7119867,0.0006107081,0.00008741421,0.00029416892,0.16647771,0.0025920277,0.0013856458,0.0542448,0.061890066,0.00012847538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007534875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01254085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076178997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019754206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021855172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040287793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387459434","doi":"10.1017/s0007123423000492","title":"Neither a Trait nor Wildly Fluctuating: On the Stability of Populist Attitudes and its Implications for Empirical Research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Trait; Stability (learning theory); Variable (mathematics); Empirical research; Panel survey; Social psychology; Panel data; Positive economics; Psychology; Economics; Econometrics; Demographic economics; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.2516642829491886,"score_gpt":0.4943962343580522,"score_spread":0.2427319514088636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387459434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99371296,0.0003239764,0.0019483116,0.00073419657,0.000018110388,0.000008251892,0.0002237189,0.000009515921,0.0030209024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995757,0.000034153967,0.00014512177,0.000036169095,0.000011440909,0.0000038316875,0.000107275104,0.0000035611383,0.0000827663],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99515015,0.0022990834,0.0003141055,0.0011838707,0.0005621152,0.0004907403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90868497,0.060821828,0.01669234,0.0074314647,0.0038823942,0.0024869724],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010202806,0.0001856887,0.0005960932,0.00194603,0.0014077143,0.0029360196,0.000821551,0.0008139043,0.0052502677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045291666,0.00020209301,0.00048018646,0.003161705,0.004140111,0.002518574,0.001943751,0.0015408796,0.000411853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012774322,0.00006543827,0.9761105,0.00004760386,0.0002502532,0.00010796203,0.0034474882,0.0007824205,0.00024739333,0.0077093625,0.0004137708,0.010689959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064104224,0.00007808532,0.9813487,0.000072220835,0.000061737475,0.000066116125,0.004972338,0.0037761198,0.00022811204,0.008253441,0.0010998859,0.000036806254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073352256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005938065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9897972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086001033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052021496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053958237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387610122","doi":"10.1017/s0007123423000364","title":"When Do Citizens Consider Political Parties Legitimate?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Göteborgs Universitet; Universität Wien; University of Cambridge; Universität Trier","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.06709679439967577,"score_gpt":0.37930159619604636,"score_spread":0.3122048017963706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387610122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97586447,0.00013271994,0.0005135435,0.0018375361,0.00003100014,0.000008227446,0.00005038124,0.0000046169835,0.021557495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996214,0.000038584578,0.000033309854,0.000087930515,0.000011029057,0.0000024304175,0.000014825063,0.000001146468,0.00018925061],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973322,0.0014363314,0.0001450924,0.0002205584,0.00046992817,0.00039591925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879694,0.005871692,0.003453143,0.000569365,0.0012441087,0.0008923315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031416141,0.000100894045,0.00024191709,0.000730948,0.0010471746,0.0038626846,0.00021752201,0.0010668478,0.004790652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015240861,0.00010736021,0.0001917241,0.00081102626,0.0021867747,0.0018770404,0.0010582176,0.0012397777,0.00049623905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060311164,0.00022983595,0.8398593,0.0002246405,0.00013275132,0.00049680326,0.056815874,0.00037396533,0.0032332276,0.027140014,0.00424128,0.06664921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040459192,0.00021405605,0.77315706,0.0002454343,0.00006516603,0.0003421187,0.1768565,0.0016676419,0.0018034759,0.02358152,0.02196298,0.00006359027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013781394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019321662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004790652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054298114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030587486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016614616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387610144","doi":"10.1017/s0007123423000315","title":"Crossing the Line: Evidence for the Categorization Theory of Spatial Voting","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Stony Brook University; Simon Fraser University; Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich; University of Southampton; University of Dayton","keywords":"Ideology; Voting; Salience (neuroscience); Categorization; Social psychology; Social identity theory; Norm (philosophy); Identity (music); Econometrics; Psychology; Positive economics; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Cognitive psychology; Social group; Artificial intelligence; Politics; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.12813373076818074,"score_gpt":0.42828018646238053,"score_spread":0.3001464556941998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387610144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84842885,0.00062890816,0.038702708,0.0056074187,0.0001685573,0.0000845887,0.00045858358,0.00010555261,0.105814666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969997,0.00007159851,0.0017714448,0.00021292274,0.000030806,0.00002080766,0.00010582815,0.000018012903,0.000768802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98967534,0.0045868596,0.00047212013,0.0017149546,0.0030608021,0.0004898563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8719967,0.07511074,0.01877737,0.02374308,0.008248772,0.0021234436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011457746,0.00031723888,0.0009201015,0.0015316475,0.0011680484,0.0031510391,0.0021301808,0.0019075369,0.03240939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08189406,0.00031986556,0.0007023658,0.0018966862,0.0058198078,0.005003224,0.0032567172,0.0018292353,0.0016723315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003623115,0.0018220346,0.24156289,0.0012965484,0.00062627695,0.00044656437,0.008768469,0.008138982,0.0070569674,0.5746929,0.008603745,0.14336155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004978256,0.0008303232,0.24729697,0.00024488172,0.00020185842,0.0005351336,0.0073577506,0.029778395,0.0024507097,0.6960485,0.014615588,0.00014203286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002963353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001968316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03240939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013343951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005747574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10842025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407419334","doi":"10.1017/s0007123424000929","title":"Do Political Leaders Understand Public Opinion Better than Backbenchers?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Vlaamse regering; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Universität Konstanz; University of Toronto; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Public opinion; Politics; Political science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.09741596568846485,"score_gpt":0.39649818993284575,"score_spread":0.2990822242443809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407419334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921096,0.00015655268,0.0006853583,0.00040437124,0.000024719166,0.000012499019,0.00012645457,0.00001607372,0.0064643924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99906236,0.000083820894,0.00010998439,0.000093862065,0.00002399007,0.0000056143813,0.0001314508,0.000005151407,0.00048383442],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998711,0.0005676778,0.0000871884,0.0001671354,0.00027658066,0.000190474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826733,0.009079284,0.0049187313,0.0010111796,0.0015479652,0.0007695365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028712978,0.00022152832,0.00041506364,0.0010750766,0.00039301318,0.0024294863,0.00021512492,0.0007102695,0.010083649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022663701,0.0002034813,0.00026702698,0.0006536691,0.0007222273,0.0017165099,0.00060970115,0.00068171986,0.0015956523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006826056,0.0002045022,0.9329282,0.00016458044,0.00016619508,0.0001194923,0.015795896,0.00034232982,0.0023200193,0.0011394877,0.0021164776,0.04402016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025317247,0.00018042375,0.9796,0.00008567762,0.000042110772,0.000106330706,0.013127566,0.0016090497,0.0006470744,0.001680903,0.0028680486,0.000027517699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027209232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023707624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010083649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002583668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015757052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03373313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407421343","doi":"10.1017/s0007123424000413","title":"The Spillover of the US Capitol Insurrection: Reducing Expressed Support for Domestic Far-Right Parties","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Southampton; Newcastle University; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Spillover effect; Far right; Political science; Business; International trade; Law; Economics; Politics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02184136230356709,"score_gpt":0.3501989710229674,"score_spread":0.3283576087194003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407421343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99034446,0.000107715234,0.00024190023,0.0008800508,0.000014760794,0.000008477664,0.00025407632,0.000009638515,0.00813888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881494,0.000038269005,0.00004277481,0.00012243605,0.0000091203465,0.00000671632,0.00014640197,0.0000021958076,0.0008170332],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925464,0.0003479767,0.00001971234,0.00009170155,0.00009651065,0.00018948417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99523723,0.0021924844,0.001429901,0.0003765301,0.00030247902,0.00046128657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013249953,0.00013102156,0.00030885322,0.0004717847,0.00083588564,0.0014847069,0.0002926666,0.00059231604,0.0084410915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067420388,0.00008179708,0.00012299963,0.00073472725,0.00086498604,0.0006033102,0.0014542671,0.0009096278,0.0005396599],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015918154,0.0010570307,0.8203133,0.00028986984,0.00030641654,0.0008173344,0.016630363,0.006340473,0.0034911653,0.018458992,0.026097717,0.104605466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046910627,0.00024128937,0.9570409,0.00007988607,0.000070455455,0.00006540526,0.016664574,0.0020974453,0.0019061584,0.002945076,0.01881055,0.000031480195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016468847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021923056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016468847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008154817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005954675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032745957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408769471","doi":"10.1017/s0007123424000784","title":"International Border Restrictions During COVID-19 as Global Health Security Theatre","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Global health; Health security; Pandemic; Political science; International trade; Virology; Business; Medicine; Public health; Health care; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Law; Outbreak","score_opus":0.016820952296355073,"score_gpt":0.42262302865314255,"score_spread":0.4058020763567875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408769471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91433483,0.00048115908,0.0011724685,0.006504822,0.00014321783,0.000039308994,0.0001639325,0.000021225218,0.077139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834514,0.0001032086,0.00009881773,0.00024840332,0.000014179541,0.0000071920667,0.000022799846,0.00000447233,0.0011558859],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972548,0.0016351028,0.00007513221,0.00013740841,0.00021235924,0.0006852727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942327,0.0020840198,0.0018735225,0.00049575843,0.00047724412,0.00083674677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028838892,0.0001346096,0.00014721669,0.0006209562,0.0031428942,0.0032925853,0.00034333894,0.001313231,0.005565661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005503036,0.0001899366,0.00017927123,0.00074217253,0.004547495,0.0023267306,0.0035620674,0.003042564,0.00029615752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051094766,0.0003364797,0.24406345,0.00040074272,0.00007814051,0.0018189539,0.37278104,0.0014501846,0.0050577964,0.27566236,0.027624225,0.07021577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031449243,0.000324736,0.28960356,0.0006962616,0.000032512253,0.0006475443,0.4463765,0.001132351,0.001385864,0.011607184,0.24802496,0.00013713037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012113754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0210875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012113754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002927386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012229967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024086475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409083318","doi":"10.1017/s0007123424000693","title":"When Reelection Increases Party Unity: Evidence from Parties in Mexico","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.043729665676710563,"score_gpt":0.3586450740271418,"score_spread":0.31491540835043125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409083318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949004,0.00019203995,0.00010081553,0.00038583533,0.00000955336,0.000008301069,0.0003610632,0.000004353115,0.0040376685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987079,0.00010817735,0.000058615384,0.00005435029,0.000020402402,0.0000097135735,0.0003900488,0.000004671205,0.0006461352],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987338,0.0005140302,0.00006250106,0.00022029263,0.00016265418,0.00030669483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99148655,0.0029470986,0.0038045037,0.000606199,0.0006737768,0.00048169054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020476787,0.00011576966,0.00034562402,0.0010759112,0.0014095174,0.0018279074,0.00040150306,0.00055596296,0.0069833533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0103986235,0.00015940209,0.00027893315,0.0018044035,0.00068420917,0.0006574541,0.0016804497,0.0008445374,0.00047246763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006863626,0.00020915756,0.9712837,0.00011960282,0.00013476502,0.0001701865,0.006935158,0.00016894327,0.0004965438,0.0016975557,0.0022148946,0.015883273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022492964,0.000053210064,0.99089396,0.000028341701,0.000046106732,0.000023830307,0.0048296475,0.00017208228,0.00017521158,0.00016566092,0.0035837058,0.0000057433117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03403663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03782763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03403663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007010812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041162595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06767702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410403404","doi":"10.1017/s0007123424000930","title":"Inflation, Blame Attribution, and the 2022 US Congressional Elections","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Blame; Inflation (cosmology); Attribution; Political science; Keynesian economics; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.015966587378335954,"score_gpt":0.35184770490028106,"score_spread":0.3358811175219451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410403404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99348456,0.000056886496,0.00007157178,0.00034054645,0.000015838837,0.000008872005,0.00006499753,0.000004638561,0.0059520784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992077,0.000021887092,0.000039927094,0.000048530397,0.000012946567,0.000005579066,0.000075475655,0.000002124373,0.0005857641],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820316,0.0010136967,0.00008901685,0.00011396465,0.00036258777,0.00021761563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769956,0.009663059,0.009061705,0.0012571487,0.0016821031,0.0013403294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036333585,0.00017194971,0.0002407723,0.0006026855,0.0010806199,0.001735322,0.00020848315,0.0006380149,0.0077884104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023477191,0.0001499895,0.00020484744,0.00050052116,0.00067323545,0.0005953764,0.0010625918,0.0011890692,0.0006891769],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008265284,0.0010284581,0.9631747,0.000052120213,0.00007972046,0.00008615777,0.006500824,0.00035607256,0.0009750794,0.0018237001,0.0019321447,0.02316447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000765583,0.00010786,0.994385,0.000012763558,0.000011160008,0.000022293456,0.0033788534,0.0002818247,0.0001899891,0.0002879132,0.0013047012,0.000010058813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004378797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007461388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077884104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005731996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039897626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02605486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412994104","doi":"10.1017/s0007123425000390","title":"Voter Sexism and Electoral Penalties for Women Candidates: Evidence from Four Democracies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Reading; University of Oxford; University College London; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Political science; Demographic economics; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.038944165312571895,"score_gpt":0.36030086117939475,"score_spread":0.32135669586682286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412994104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99590045,0.00015878935,0.000062799685,0.00015837286,0.0000070926967,0.000010367349,0.00032438192,0.0000019215877,0.0033758364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916995,0.00007942536,0.0000363363,0.000034145804,0.000008438671,0.000006585803,0.00023796511,0.000001903492,0.00042523068],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762684,0.0012370598,0.00015137576,0.00022992583,0.00037429933,0.00038054082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97628504,0.0101143,0.0087563945,0.0010546914,0.0020283463,0.0017612966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034963225,0.00014962039,0.00048550486,0.0018203702,0.0015565687,0.0010883554,0.0003759255,0.0004359041,0.0064616557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012778055,0.00026115545,0.0003416007,0.0025568716,0.0012457524,0.0003598685,0.001084353,0.00069064845,0.0007676855],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046247515,0.000116652795,0.9885959,0.00008811422,0.000110414105,0.00010564785,0.0025236707,0.00006495195,0.00025301555,0.0004567403,0.00067853235,0.0065439222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001956077,0.0000838592,0.9960068,0.000022065331,0.000035039957,0.000051513707,0.0021598572,0.00007660594,0.00014567203,0.000089374735,0.0013044458,0.000005288109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035880886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08335927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035880886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007528437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006171527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07134408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416161625","doi":"10.1017/s0007123425100987","title":"Leveling and Spotlighting: How the European Court of Justice Favors the Weak to Promote Its Legitimacy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Leverage (statistics); Odds; European court of justice; Economic Justice; European Union law; Private rights","score_opus":0.04800517972276541,"score_gpt":0.3566066833202704,"score_spread":0.308601503597505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416161625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29615742,0.0010190149,0.00866161,0.039361022,0.00039238782,0.00006538406,0.00004073467,0.0000663268,0.6542362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909471,0.00009598644,0.00047775396,0.00274087,0.000072760355,0.000011638249,0.000006372954,0.000022179864,0.0056253006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97782534,0.011186684,0.0007454575,0.0029446927,0.003732084,0.0035657198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.958572,0.025433261,0.0036515496,0.0036489023,0.005557675,0.0031367103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018836504,0.00028404148,0.00068851816,0.0033107167,0.011077478,0.025986973,0.0017433023,0.008745888,0.014750982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066672005,0.0004059062,0.00033698478,0.002186579,0.03402484,0.011092217,0.008262895,0.0055308957,0.0011960776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054942786,0.00004769189,0.0049906233,0.00003459796,0.000020449408,0.0004020638,0.010075904,0.00035839295,0.0006755891,0.9654816,0.0057955133,0.012062799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010811319,0.00018635232,0.013321646,0.0005332425,0.00010149362,0.00034032096,0.032785952,0.0030138015,0.002217128,0.75543165,0.19182104,0.00013927759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010324897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012871046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025986973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054075746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09961814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116707465","doi":"10.1017/s0007123425101099","title":"A Two-Path Theory of Context Effects: Pseudoenvironments and Social Cohesion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Social Power and Status Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Northwestern University; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; University of Minnesota; Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University; American Political Science Association; Sage Foundation","keywords":"Cohesion (chemistry); Perception; Homogeneous; Diversity (politics); Social environment; Context (archaeology); Social reality","score_opus":0.0072488398275224394,"score_gpt":0.3036758869072711,"score_spread":0.29642704707974865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116707465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58114266,0.00094691716,0.25869143,0.0066317855,0.000174806,0.00041110473,0.00040029068,0.00019543096,0.15140566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99029046,0.00016503902,0.008294355,0.000093796276,0.000016908167,0.000113180584,0.000026012598,0.000012953857,0.0009872135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764025,0.0015765588,0.000036603742,0.00031581722,0.00025873605,0.00017199545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993944,0.0041040163,0.0006075735,0.00042492268,0.00042331536,0.0004960665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025991884,0.00059487525,0.00041718152,0.0018233488,0.0012916747,0.0027028762,0.0008764046,0.0009789575,0.011832345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075433953,0.0004088799,0.00081921316,0.0012610309,0.006990378,0.005614145,0.0037583534,0.0013732892,0.00035760368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010646892,0.000175757,0.016191712,0.00015093168,0.00007187776,0.00027782514,0.0066631287,0.0068442044,0.00046703222,0.9530226,0.0005327773,0.015495741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010211359,0.00022411867,0.020805977,0.00011350721,0.00009036794,0.00019862822,0.005469089,0.020800024,0.00025771974,0.94533,0.0065649105,0.00004350423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002572402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002162578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011832345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015334747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011934015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039583147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117305961","doi":"10.1017/s000712342510121x","title":"Reducing Gender Gaps in Political Participation with Efficacy Promotion: Evidence from a Civic Education Experiment in Zambia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Princeton University; University of Denver; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; University of Notre Dame; Harvard University","keywords":"Gender gap; Politics; Civic engagement; Information gap; Field (mathematics); Political efficacy","score_opus":0.06299295499729206,"score_gpt":0.41561947152894696,"score_spread":0.3526265165316549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117305961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99839777,0.000087019354,0.0001605533,0.0001703805,0.000010465206,0.00024819738,0.00004721181,0.000003976822,0.0008743766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978802,0.000113716655,0.0005942548,0.00014045161,0.0000073217275,0.00047642118,0.000041847947,0.0000022821514,0.0007435159],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977835,0.0014417005,0.000067432964,0.00019019007,0.00012117981,0.00039605232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942027,0.0032165947,0.0010739071,0.0006248315,0.00027494723,0.0006070165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007455271,0.0005174813,0.00071198953,0.0005038535,0.0028277847,0.0011267425,0.00091519253,0.0010244133,0.00678809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00678736,0.0004150522,0.00057678844,0.00046545858,0.0025654265,0.0007439722,0.0011950276,0.0016039999,0.00049976935],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08619474,0.30194548,0.29422703,0.004172225,0.0015343789,0.0014446772,0.057323936,0.0031585405,0.05052066,0.010976991,0.005605325,0.18289599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015423437,0.10642948,0.82999027,0.0009232848,0.0016786717,0.00013895662,0.017697373,0.0025730268,0.01015825,0.0032386263,0.011635612,0.000113001865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027865581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054342184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027865581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001793045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021670803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05540681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}