{"meta":{"query_hash":"90485a53b7d4","filters":{"venue":"British Journal of Political Science"},"cohort_total":70,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":70,"exported":70,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/90485a53b7d4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=British+Journal+of+Political+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W1981282433","doi":"10.1017/s0007123408000094","title":"When to Coalesce: Early Versus Late Coalition Announcement in an Experimental Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Democracy; Quarter (Canadian coin); Multi-party system; Ideal point; Government (linguistics); Political science; Point (geometry); Political economy; Politics; Law and economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.05997758551996048,"score_gpt":0.4048742977799636,"score_spread":0.3448967122600031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981282433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99360037,0.00004074238,0.00046654328,0.0017569134,0.0005895159,0.00016041446,0.0000059507015,0.000012002559,0.0033675516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984641,0.0000012577344,0.00053925236,0.00037803434,0.00051996857,0.0000020889036,6.016833e-7,0.0000052673513,0.00008943641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966992,0.00018899914,0.00054720446,0.00019237539,0.0011285546,0.0012436371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977899,0.0001617962,0.00009945309,0.00007936037,0.00038570777,0.0014837651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00448407,0.00007845741,0.00017083566,0.0001572207,0.00043643673,0.00033323304,0.00037361376,0.00006422457,0.000104738865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009260578,0.00008797573,0.000048341455,0.0004843337,0.0006306959,0.0010518347,0.000038076592,0.00019055755,0.000023143786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003726765,0.000721989,0.044511694,0.000009508608,0.0000061201977,0.00041239362,0.006532116,0.000020734831,0.027688595,0.91386944,0.00038032368,0.0054744175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017303933,0.002418456,0.95858914,0.00033802894,0.000015090559,0.000073063144,0.0048074815,0.000046616948,0.0067268987,0.022372868,0.0024519623,0.00043000007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02972317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013236362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91407746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010422708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004325024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.976738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982679242","doi":"10.1017/s0007123414000520","title":"Measuring the Cost of Privacy: A Look at the Distributional Effects of Private Bargaining","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Negotiation; Parallels; Plaintiff; Disadvantage; Settlement (finance); Business; International trade; Political science; Law; Economics; Law and economics; Finance; Payment","score_opus":0.030880142646989343,"score_gpt":0.29100361592132823,"score_spread":0.2601234732743389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982679242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809644,0.00039631853,0.0014975921,0.0109282555,0.00040524197,0.00027237454,0.000016341028,0.000010321823,0.005509118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937415,0.0000112593425,0.0002194544,0.00014569536,0.00018266845,0.0000010032882,3.2220112e-7,0.000004587683,0.00006085456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969612,0.00030756494,0.0003979411,0.00010959208,0.0017223251,0.000501377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976715,0.00066376274,0.00029082407,0.0001263605,0.0008119119,0.0004356677],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045721177,0.000059936134,0.0001636995,0.000039967745,0.00060520193,0.00011882214,0.000991143,0.000031120257,0.000043004267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013204483,0.000042602765,0.00006748738,0.00082125544,0.004207557,0.00035380817,0.00020626768,0.00018907913,0.000004410034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009204865,0.00005916601,0.013867306,0.000008595451,0.000010835067,0.00001698176,0.000924775,0.000023798375,0.001358202,0.9825657,0.0003639557,0.0007914534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011733123,0.00016904688,0.9195666,0.0005765422,0.000071306895,0.00047004322,0.0015460309,0.000046316163,0.037508417,0.029934527,0.008735452,0.00020242267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054700364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009689228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9526312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042377517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012263265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99850243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002829966","doi":"10.1017/s000712340800032x","title":"If Winning Isn't Everything, Why Do They Keep Score? Consequences of Electoral Performance for Party Leaders","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislature; Political science; Minor (academic); Premise; Divided government; Single non-transferable vote; Position (finance); Public administration; Political economy; Business; Law; Economics; Democracy; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.07708157369696257,"score_gpt":0.3493291413140633,"score_spread":0.2722475676171007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002829966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99490386,0.00021931299,0.00037236983,0.001600683,0.0004156361,0.00018456914,0.000010518232,0.00001537353,0.0022776688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99832296,0.00003227944,0.0005111127,0.0003827586,0.000589888,0.0000051353854,4.294585e-7,0.0000076964,0.00014771087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964875,0.00019711976,0.0006914655,0.00021211182,0.0011330836,0.0012787418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753225,0.00039161867,0.00031211722,0.00009500701,0.0009441135,0.0007248898],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027723645,0.000110777015,0.0003396056,0.00011671361,0.0010571707,0.00015330673,0.00054665,0.000091762944,0.000074687385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030307341,0.0001070006,0.00014799365,0.00045800878,0.005108216,0.0010578104,0.000028678356,0.0002509307,0.0000041091075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009186172,0.00026005166,0.34735313,0.00014376706,0.000036554764,0.0000890923,0.006119395,0.00009594408,0.010894193,0.6275518,0.0028346684,0.00452952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027228629,0.0032256981,0.82853734,0.0030018096,0.00016752945,0.0027397098,0.0065122438,0.0006679832,0.03682939,0.10512966,0.008991944,0.001473798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017410008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092592987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52242213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028273065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015374812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015932347","doi":"10.1017/s0007123408000112","title":"The Politics of When: Redistribution, Investment and Policy Making for the Long Term","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Politics; Economics; Argument (complex analysis); Public economics; Term (time); Investment (military); Pension; Positive economics; Political science; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.0393832673218768,"score_gpt":0.3635690604770098,"score_spread":0.324185793155133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015932347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8223083,0.007958856,0.001788879,0.14303888,0.0014590494,0.000833822,0.00012352622,0.000027701497,0.022460992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963261,0.0010299251,0.000119196564,0.0008661519,0.0014407192,0.0000033079675,1.0112462e-7,0.0000031128225,0.00021142398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998074,0.00008150563,0.0003526308,0.00008996451,0.0006420996,0.00075979106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815965,0.0007700545,0.0001922376,0.00007238649,0.00053785666,0.00026783152],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002042835,0.00006117667,0.00014596956,0.00004422463,0.0052175317,0.00013458435,0.00047734738,0.000042519012,0.0000015848901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006368647,0.000037944705,0.00009070061,0.00030577474,0.009921973,0.00021870236,0.00009513192,0.00014113705,2.0934284e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003735718,0.00001867773,0.001504745,0.0000054425655,0.000012872599,0.000006982538,0.0024284304,1.7068513e-7,0.000019453912,0.99216324,0.0005870934,0.0032491698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003706497,0.00013111411,0.5119502,0.00014211179,0.000039194787,0.0006557474,0.008631878,0.000011346095,0.00027235813,0.4741015,0.0035716973,0.00012216947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002506594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040150055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5180617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023339746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012334363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99607754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016627412","doi":"10.1017/s0007123401000242","title":"Portfolio Salience and the Proportionality of Payoffs in Coalition Governments","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":246,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Salience (neuroscience); Negotiation; Portfolio; Legislature; Proportionality (law); Political science; Economics; Positive economics; Law and economics; Law; Financial economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.027390092862322458,"score_gpt":0.34632175898142414,"score_spread":0.3189316661191017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016627412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884573,0.0000982866,0.00018946173,0.0030728655,0.00011822108,0.00012669987,0.0000043349805,0.0000029331836,0.0079299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99942034,0.00005130117,0.00007874941,0.00020080901,0.00013504014,0.0000024436868,1.539425e-7,0.0000018230428,0.00010932359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974552,0.00029318055,0.0005417039,0.00010855756,0.0010900917,0.0005112711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988623,0.00023474908,0.00022175323,0.00005727827,0.00029273698,0.0003311285],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005480525,0.000046616446,0.00017714864,0.00004381713,0.00024110009,0.000093858536,0.00023628536,0.00003739799,0.000068477195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028379261,0.000036326746,0.00004458045,0.00046991734,0.0031613351,0.00046061687,0.000032603974,0.00013620353,0.000001235518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019898413,0.00008324693,0.1203273,0.0000057508,0.0000017443264,0.000023241384,0.00021581654,0.0000012406176,0.00012890018,0.8774125,0.000035163615,0.0017451919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000496418,0.000045719666,0.91964453,0.00011876413,0.000007945207,0.00017546357,0.0005532228,0.00003600312,0.00012348263,0.07812012,0.00062228844,0.000056014116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035977527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028866879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79931724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023742447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004250318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041314074","doi":"10.1017/s0007123411000160","title":"Language and Ideology in Congress","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Legislature; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Politics; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03988064428790917,"score_gpt":0.38087672527563565,"score_spread":0.3409960809877265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041314074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9784529,0.00025658755,0.0005291972,0.0005045805,0.00015882027,0.000019606648,6.9605403e-7,0.0000031797915,0.020074438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951311,0.000023738274,0.004463433,0.00018537644,0.000086163585,2.3108132e-7,3.1027625e-8,0.0000011217926,0.00010882778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888825,0.00017408458,0.00019595736,0.00008554204,0.00031478252,0.00034137495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926037,0.00019479687,0.00005990883,0.000025129422,0.00015986641,0.00029990476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028235728,0.000028202843,0.000112553535,0.00012187284,0.0001469262,0.00005993298,0.00022567569,0.000024503866,0.00019024292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018653806,0.000028641945,0.000028539771,0.00037467695,0.0015376922,0.0002676093,0.000040976924,0.00011206536,0.0000020703853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004916567,0.00005253862,0.028256947,0.0000018945701,0.000003246606,0.00042672196,0.004098954,6.2706914e-7,0.0001596481,0.907314,0.000022610251,0.05965789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017166341,0.000035533703,0.8824768,0.000034465826,0.000007001068,0.00036999703,0.0044820923,0.000049995342,0.00012672885,0.11195659,0.00022837086,0.00006074194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011022744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030002703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85421985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053359287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025621694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044094458","doi":"10.1017/s000712340600007x","title":"Political Decentralization and Electoral Accountability: The Argentine Experience, 1983–2001","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Accountability; Political science; Referendum; Politics; Presidential system; Blame; Public administration; Voting; Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Political economy; Survey data collection; Public economics; Economics; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.022849154808947964,"score_gpt":0.35467829088354735,"score_spread":0.3318291360745994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044094458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97349924,0.00027057697,0.00053243845,0.011392206,0.0003290076,0.0001177134,0.000009576677,0.000019083398,0.013830146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994774,0.000109420536,0.0012214791,0.0027654849,0.0009917426,0.0000022954407,3.689506e-7,0.0000066477105,0.00012857815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961318,0.0001920637,0.00047416025,0.00021033589,0.001186229,0.0018054509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977296,0.00030588123,0.00013919007,0.00012251668,0.00051238853,0.0011904242],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025551794,0.00010106782,0.0001998233,0.00005311413,0.0012615849,0.0006237133,0.0006404215,0.0000708225,0.00026055012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033731034,0.00008709627,0.00010044812,0.0006148094,0.0060841874,0.0007908678,0.00009299313,0.00029365355,0.0000056302515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026952562,0.00008247166,0.011518681,0.0000024670562,0.0000043163736,0.00000708323,0.0011542895,8.917259e-7,0.00019989323,0.9841383,0.00035360825,0.0025352642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013487277,0.00031825298,0.6396977,0.00024185334,0.000114279435,0.002097123,0.033966027,0.0022003853,0.001472313,0.10627685,0.21130039,0.0009661522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046507376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004133939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8778615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005167483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000956094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99662066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051392286","doi":"10.1017/s0007123410000013","title":"The Dynamics of Ethnonationalist Contention","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamism; Politics; Incentive; Context (archaeology); Political science; Political economy; Dynamics (music); Nationalism; Contentious politics; Social movement; Economic system; Sociology; Economics; Law; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.029779799831743663,"score_gpt":0.36697273342941994,"score_spread":0.33719293359767627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051392286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9751399,0.000043111933,0.0005055683,0.010496784,0.0010006347,0.00007143859,0.000008867359,0.000005449911,0.012728223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990879,0.000005286415,0.00013705019,0.000073491035,0.00033493433,9.081885e-7,3.2314594e-7,0.0000021441201,0.00035795153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980679,0.00011584781,0.00038618565,0.00006712607,0.0008821824,0.00048071393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997796,0.00043374958,0.0001821218,0.00006044236,0.0011476767,0.000380037],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041525797,0.00003451629,0.000095935386,0.00003865498,0.00072571717,0.0001925198,0.00039206937,0.00004862238,0.00005507675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006355737,0.000028190425,0.000066668435,0.00031448965,0.0028359005,0.0003237769,0.000020639778,0.00024196897,0.0000031005773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002289766,0.000024409454,0.0030368026,0.0000018913217,0.0000018348137,0.0000026026864,0.000054180437,3.558566e-7,0.0016657151,0.990678,0.000071932336,0.004459944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033522016,0.00013627646,0.64052397,0.00010633187,0.00002213212,0.00019505355,0.0013189331,0.00059853663,0.0012320197,0.34908745,0.0062952954,0.00014876625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016936494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03602346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6415906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013801946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006214761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061885562","doi":"10.1017/s0007123412000051","title":"Global Migration and Political Regime Type: A Democratic Disadvantage","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autocracy; Democracy; Divergence (linguistics); Emigration; Politics; Globalization; Immigration; Disadvantage; Development economics; Order (exchange); Capital (architecture); Economics; Economic system; Political science; Political economy; Economic geography; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.012897605645456936,"score_gpt":0.33010439615750553,"score_spread":0.3172067905120486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061885562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793552,0.0003468654,0.001037971,0.004913452,0.00045834182,0.0000698989,0.000011073018,0.000014965605,0.013792218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997247,0.00008010176,0.0011378814,0.00077781914,0.00048569875,4.4765778e-7,5.146353e-7,0.0000031819436,0.00026736822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769783,0.00014816552,0.00029035076,0.000112578826,0.00073197874,0.0010190986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787587,0.00011092893,0.00008860388,0.00006253931,0.00033951714,0.0015225257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017652566,0.00006788236,0.00013944048,0.00005079806,0.00047072364,0.0002827109,0.00024024012,0.00006135079,0.000076868964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003016629,0.00006803361,0.00004185809,0.00055785687,0.0015918703,0.0010761493,0.000040618215,0.00013504471,0.000007575629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004170074,0.00005808939,0.030079536,0.0000033533424,0.0000022144293,0.000014483737,0.0004447891,4.0638426e-7,0.000080879836,0.96726125,0.00031799712,0.0017328504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056213327,0.0002060358,0.8660413,0.00016537869,0.000067241606,0.002687299,0.012231945,0.0005917414,0.000073332616,0.10429799,0.012679075,0.0003965379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023523879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044690333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86296326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003739439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005651373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5865313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063608249","doi":"10.1017/s0007123405000153","title":"Political Knowledge and Enlightened Preferences: Party Choice Through the Electoral Cycle","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Explanatory power; Politics; Power (physics); Panel data; Panel survey; Work (physics); Predictive power; Political science; Positive economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.04842319659622016,"score_gpt":0.3751515009704209,"score_spread":0.32672830437420075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063608249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9426583,0.0008844184,0.00017419053,0.01710799,0.0003476002,0.00017603805,0.000008633245,0.00002765481,0.03861519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964879,0.000016010605,0.00029825477,0.0009186206,0.0020073752,0.0000049936784,2.9903268e-7,0.000007239884,0.0002592742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612087,0.00044676955,0.0005568909,0.00023739686,0.0008908882,0.001747156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972006,0.0007588883,0.00013246798,0.00012313918,0.00055692595,0.0012279633],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021541659,0.00012114179,0.0002571163,0.00005198565,0.0011733971,0.0005304346,0.0006001364,0.00010002859,0.00010696313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032145616,0.00009221594,0.00009034006,0.00053567433,0.0030458013,0.0011081427,0.000077414945,0.00038208155,0.000027719121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042830593,0.0000945304,0.0047190622,0.0000064793066,0.000005707309,0.000005768404,0.0005308104,8.713202e-7,0.00021477607,0.990072,0.00037473795,0.003970967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010202561,0.0005441936,0.5007546,0.00038941516,0.0001100293,0.0006515314,0.0018203099,0.00035839406,0.0022887725,0.36382273,0.12760752,0.00063226715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02212595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012365441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62624925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004127042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009806297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074487618","doi":"10.1017/s0007123406000299","title":"Demotion and Dissent in the Canadian Liberal Party","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Cabinet (room); Political science; Loyalty; Dissent; Law; Ideology; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.012263867012593962,"score_gpt":0.2806476569936694,"score_spread":0.2683837899810754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074487618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9441073,0.00019807703,0.000018832076,0.012574387,0.00016526063,0.00006738929,0.0000065879117,0.0000025499264,0.04285965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986664,0.000012433894,0.00005904206,0.000641974,0.00042386344,8.1677126e-7,1.0135456e-7,0.0000016784705,0.00019370395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979897,0.00015029951,0.0002480233,0.00009819293,0.0006852109,0.0008285452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990962,0.00012162184,0.00005938756,0.000044753448,0.00010879,0.00056923495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027279234,0.000042507232,0.000096935604,0.0000504661,0.00062092376,0.0004385477,0.00032252376,0.000040921583,0.000018853976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009461736,0.00003418767,0.000031471787,0.00032083192,0.0014573327,0.00037817002,0.000014579137,0.00018114735,0.000002724938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.4712825e-7,0.000020876116,0.018867783,0.0000015086093,3.353243e-7,0.00011763866,0.000195023,6.5969095e-7,0.000014623153,0.97911984,0.00047877958,0.0011823726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009257279,0.00001775699,0.9285587,0.000058976253,0.0000022407132,0.0003368245,0.00029329179,0.000012252463,0.00000825797,0.058489185,0.012079018,0.00005094402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9247382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9071434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9206307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042760788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075594103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53696036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081833995","doi":"10.1017/s0007123400220292","title":"The Effect of Referendumson Democratic Citizens: Information, Politicization, Efficacy and Tolerance","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Democracy; Political science; Voting; Government (linguistics); Direct democracy; Politics; Public administration; Affect (linguistics); Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.006461183474082537,"score_gpt":0.2715172338655089,"score_spread":0.2650560503914264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081833995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725429,0.00088249746,0.00008621314,0.0019299017,0.00021942046,0.0001742633,0.000014974606,0.000010819936,0.024139041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987013,0.0003192668,0.000061624036,0.0002524706,0.00024065055,0.000001987288,2.0827713e-7,0.0000033222927,0.0004192201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713045,0.0002794222,0.0006456471,0.00010405771,0.0010035824,0.00083685725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977462,0.00088568346,0.00021954277,0.00010675285,0.00041628754,0.0006254825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029326307,0.00008565793,0.00024565478,0.000044587152,0.0009568957,0.00035536665,0.00048640513,0.00005695755,0.00007027634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063030114,0.00006492511,0.00005716222,0.00044135915,0.0025614896,0.00094680995,0.000028326043,0.00018414513,0.000008694625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002669334,0.00001570105,0.0019355979,0.000024300167,0.00000613094,0.000007693783,0.00034624588,0.0000063091143,0.000034118097,0.95266044,0.00059860235,0.04433817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002155045,0.000879348,0.8933819,0.0011148471,0.000062181374,0.00076749333,0.0005814175,0.00018277929,0.0012465649,0.043156836,0.05610989,0.00036167714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077628093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022647608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9095036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015863661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040811644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99884456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082480816","doi":"10.1017/s0007123405000190","title":"‘Presidentialization’ in Japan? The Prime Minister, Media and Elections in Japan","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Politics; Political science; Popularity; Phenomenon; Democracy; Bureaucracy; Presidential system; Prime (order theory); Political economy; Nomination; Political culture; Public administration; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.014998176537438243,"score_gpt":0.30483332345285424,"score_spread":0.289835146915416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082480816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9806885,0.00048958795,0.00007718266,0.010145875,0.0002502263,0.0001021083,0.0000052906285,0.0000053874955,0.0082358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99839824,0.00010542179,0.00010784575,0.0005731763,0.0005144771,0.0000023407854,7.645452e-8,0.0000033738195,0.00029502474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765813,0.00018557825,0.00045643415,0.00015271215,0.0007601115,0.0007870376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988976,0.00033469964,0.00011057716,0.00007064261,0.00014015546,0.0004462946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025370913,0.00006007,0.00015809489,0.000099589466,0.00036934426,0.00033317995,0.0004336893,0.00005495533,0.000054025542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003947787,0.000053308122,0.0000376406,0.0006799953,0.0015700114,0.00068140164,0.000053971173,0.00024416047,0.000005260847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003346194,0.00009255008,0.0318578,0.000003368195,0.0000016958525,0.000023162538,0.0021031173,0.0000042751144,0.00019367745,0.95746726,0.00027069196,0.007979044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027968752,0.000026252428,0.9773572,0.00014695381,0.000004376372,0.000264977,0.0011906261,0.00006854716,0.00009426231,0.012018787,0.008461186,0.00008712439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04715745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073859796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9454994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003701308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006121241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9591876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087358759","doi":"10.1017/s0007123414000076","title":"Global Experimentalist Governance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Science, Research, and Medicine","field":"Medicine","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.017838532965907074,"score_gpt":0.3608016357382262,"score_spread":0.3429631027723191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087358759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9514617,0.0005709781,0.000771843,0.0031575845,0.00048530014,0.00007321254,0.0000057218967,0.00001070802,0.043462973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99570554,0.000050040395,0.0011025652,0.0022511336,0.00061721605,7.241216e-7,2.1958462e-7,0.0000034735515,0.00026909402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968801,0.00003465948,0.00031930167,0.00019469397,0.0017274271,0.00084380235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977187,0.00005674165,0.00008889274,0.00013785226,0.0004083725,0.0015894386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018331856,0.000071373914,0.00023506118,0.000046261055,0.00016511888,0.00009872969,0.00042214617,0.000031346826,0.00018578698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003426788,0.000060509363,0.00008132882,0.0006068322,0.0021498045,0.00030516513,0.00007564315,0.00018416396,0.000016874266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001244026,0.00073390186,0.06632617,0.00006690738,0.00001914774,0.002184724,0.00015147166,0.0000020093205,0.03668644,0.7309917,0.010380805,0.15233229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014461407,0.0006547541,0.96271664,0.00042873312,0.000017729573,0.02064138,0.00035429714,0.00017334604,0.0058412068,0.0025490124,0.005077172,0.00009960745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008156319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025766965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89639044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043990402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069592334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7921045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091844576","doi":"10.1017/s0007123404000092","title":"Referendum Voting as Political Choice: The Case of Quebec","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Voting; Status quo bias; Public economics; Multicollinearity; Politics; Status quo; Economics; Political science; Positive economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Regression analysis; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.047048196407669184,"score_gpt":0.3836183567624699,"score_spread":0.33657016035480075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091844576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9756684,0.00009166882,0.00019182671,0.0114416685,0.0003727586,0.000112411224,0.000007279927,0.000012833065,0.012101167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982222,0.0000016626791,0.00012430064,0.0005276388,0.0009153805,0.0000017784486,1.7366001e-7,0.0000065852237,0.00020029822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646014,0.00029897326,0.00068933755,0.00017164828,0.00090438937,0.0014755045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970612,0.000565066,0.00021921335,0.00012008199,0.00077331177,0.0012611283],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031713992,0.00009375482,0.00025075418,0.000086458975,0.0008992073,0.00028508969,0.0005500853,0.000092058195,0.000110676265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008961474,0.000075937074,0.00013259062,0.0006425989,0.003182378,0.0005718281,0.00006309208,0.00038590474,0.00001735862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032281891,0.00007112342,0.0008321785,0.000008737392,0.000004958035,0.000558497,0.0002942194,0.0000047812873,0.00027828035,0.99608773,0.00004207104,0.0018141979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020586816,0.0009964706,0.27949455,0.0013667595,0.00019424148,0.03334039,0.015095199,0.00007746657,0.008108217,0.65387374,0.00458707,0.0008072055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69218457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18605644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50612813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072215206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002193024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094366616","doi":"10.1017/s0007123401000230","title":"The Transformation of Southern Politics Revisited: The House of Representatives as a Window","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Desegregation; Politics; Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Identity (music); Race (biology); Resistance (ecology); Identity politics; Sociology; Public administration; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.03442542746681318,"score_gpt":0.36660019240305475,"score_spread":0.33217476493624154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094366616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838815,0.00029931217,0.00027066944,0.006755624,0.000114188275,0.00016381968,0.000014086391,0.000007781724,0.008493038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992971,0.000091799506,0.000032315536,0.00012703416,0.00026018347,0.0000015296971,1.2721435e-7,0.0000049217374,0.00018500433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970271,0.00045220015,0.0006848043,0.0000868573,0.001097301,0.0006517378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769443,0.0007460323,0.0003180891,0.00012211825,0.0007749861,0.00034434962],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038240931,0.000060162758,0.00018394449,0.000051502902,0.0007468331,0.00015493762,0.00054793735,0.000044339544,0.000043515345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033804865,0.000039274033,0.00011843052,0.0006017514,0.0031591274,0.0003765903,0.000022506863,0.00017869967,0.00000798794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015292639,0.000052966305,0.004500653,0.0000115766525,0.000009751182,0.0000076991,0.0046393014,0.0000054259312,0.0011346962,0.98637295,0.00006703884,0.0031826526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013318092,0.00096820534,0.30824867,0.0011369531,0.00017521212,0.0010266126,0.07273233,0.00020047577,0.012270894,0.58828944,0.013183928,0.00043544895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024870308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011467662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39808348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010622792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005453968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097128903","doi":"10.1017/s0007123412000269","title":"Measuring the Median: The Risks of Inferring Beliefs from Votes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Congruence (geometry); Ideology; Virtue; Measure (data warehouse); Democracy; Core (optical fiber); Political science; Positive economics; Econometrics; Actuarial science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Computer science; Politics; Data mining","score_opus":0.15574098343427084,"score_gpt":0.3943573260368243,"score_spread":0.23861634260255343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097128903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98529106,0.0006825215,0.0002325109,0.008466814,0.00077704777,0.0000903279,0.0000057464154,0.0000068150457,0.004447155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788404,0.00001780289,0.00008826302,0.00024289888,0.0017320799,0.0000018316704,9.611885e-8,0.000003856677,0.000029118753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699306,0.0003688222,0.00044151943,0.0000801684,0.0011802823,0.0009361609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768955,0.001022126,0.00019383017,0.000108583175,0.0003704362,0.0006155003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054322006,0.000060440445,0.00015984957,0.000036352245,0.00079609634,0.00018249375,0.00065850053,0.000048851438,0.00008536932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005957358,0.000038670736,0.000088447865,0.0003961707,0.0020673503,0.00060307013,0.000065137894,0.00028213716,0.000010121534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042726697,0.00008481792,0.120364636,0.0000068441936,0.000016487807,0.0000054859556,0.004417067,0.00000837717,0.0018840863,0.8628018,0.00020700762,0.010199137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115059105,0.000036714307,0.9503607,0.00017422721,0.000030133098,0.00004265257,0.0015296282,0.000027122089,0.0023165385,0.04364958,0.0016278944,0.000089751346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09960217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004272821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82999605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016063666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037305258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90639365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106901522","doi":"10.1017/s0007123414000192","title":"Ideological Clarity in Multiparty Competition: A New Measure and Test Using Election Manifestos","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; CLARITY; Ambiguity; Appeal; Manifesto; Political science; Competition (biology); Democracy; Position (finance); Computer science; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.055855599701273954,"score_gpt":0.3521060277296881,"score_spread":0.2962504280284141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106901522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99389696,0.00006484341,0.0015064728,0.002384453,0.0001844021,0.000093200964,0.0000013159084,0.000011571895,0.0018567832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99831605,0.000004051035,0.00072327175,0.0002747952,0.00063993764,6.7199824e-7,1.2864082e-7,0.0000030725166,0.00003804991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977275,0.00033558256,0.00039267365,0.0001660657,0.0006454466,0.0007327078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826044,0.00045544998,0.00010729396,0.000048927166,0.0002836023,0.00084427703],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003320049,0.00006765712,0.00019752594,0.00008638965,0.00044309275,0.00023185275,0.00017686054,0.000098265125,0.000052313906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008635475,0.00006803806,0.00004075808,0.00044887874,0.0009707104,0.0005203694,0.000028250452,0.00030687754,0.0000035632793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000873972,0.000120093166,0.16827326,0.000009383813,0.0000016818863,0.000036863745,0.00017847281,0.0000083712575,0.003662822,0.82370937,0.000049844493,0.003941126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044028455,0.0002077484,0.9530574,0.00021105127,0.000011594239,0.0005923253,0.00014096659,0.00089522585,0.00020549029,0.043474544,0.0006259972,0.00013736333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050910674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01895992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78478414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036028642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005022163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109759438","doi":"10.1017/s0007123412000579","title":"Sorting Out Mechanical and Psychological Effects in Candidate Elections: An Appraisal with Experimental Data","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Condorcet method; Sorting; Measure (data warehouse); Disadvantage; Econometrics; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Algorithm; Voting; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07731461782229494,"score_gpt":0.43730696726130525,"score_spread":0.3599923494390103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109759438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975385,0.0000767143,0.0003943784,0.0007585896,0.00020877081,0.00016991943,0.000002131407,0.000012909885,0.00083808374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985213,0.000003868434,0.0009651726,0.00017451285,0.00030714716,0.000007914668,6.476821e-7,0.00000484235,0.000014571235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975402,0.00031670078,0.00037537923,0.00027849077,0.0006103815,0.00087888946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983997,0.00028091806,0.000100634454,0.00012670085,0.00015824448,0.0009338553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018763116,0.00007722783,0.00019496825,0.00007175223,0.00040842363,0.00044274385,0.0004517597,0.00006712536,0.000059421407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002219243,0.000065984794,0.000017737288,0.0003027667,0.0010203671,0.0015380752,0.00007448408,0.0002685646,0.000006575271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005130663,0.0012628686,0.042430438,0.000023433904,0.000013039604,0.00027511205,0.001761112,0.0000039933425,0.023392351,0.91614515,0.00025370554,0.014387515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023535,0.0039715357,0.9385687,0.0006677422,0.00004216724,0.0019458745,0.006116011,0.0026037472,0.0033804753,0.03925725,0.0003488496,0.00074414094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031600688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009018335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89613825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014711004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021879782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.974848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115791431","doi":"10.1017/s0007123404000250","title":"Review Article: Dismantling the Health Care State? Political Institutions, Public Policies and the Comparative Politics of Health Reform","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":164,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Politics; Legislature; Public administration; Political science; Health care reform; Welfare state; Health care; Autonomy; Health policy; Political economy; Public economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.0987380296949226,"score_gpt":0.43932075961605965,"score_spread":0.34058272992113703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115791431","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2205628,0.08612469,0.00019310197,0.6830153,0.00037151278,0.00071170955,0.000076771954,0.000024655215,0.008919478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708479,0.01418144,0.00010556583,0.014496605,0.00034454645,0.000004199303,4.3659668e-7,0.000004168301,0.000015156421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583113,0.000586129,0.0009292772,0.0001516798,0.0009713492,0.001530429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975623,0.00031648893,0.00044035644,0.00013372677,0.00072998984,0.0008171751],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005573627,0.000117741074,0.00058222195,0.00008117051,0.004520685,0.00022865225,0.000620072,0.000036310903,0.0000020639272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026027593,0.00006825006,0.00013625431,0.0008496244,0.016801165,0.00048320924,0.00016290873,0.0004149762,0.000001264016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034595812,0.000040900726,0.0001362826,0.00009419794,0.000013674563,0.0000019361514,0.015301676,7.9256506e-7,5.4667146e-7,0.98247415,0.000094837276,0.0018375485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025630468,0.0005929425,0.08556154,0.0053772265,0.00008372745,0.0009209798,0.40525678,0.000004733032,0.00007333056,0.4906214,0.008518735,0.00042556136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08427513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00694165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7502851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014048815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006134956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118134033","doi":"10.1017/s0007123405000074","title":"Inaccurate, Exceptional, One-Sided or Irrelevant? The Debate about the Alleged Decline of Social Capital and Civic Engagement in Western Societies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":314,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Civic engagement; Social capital; Politics; Attendance; Political capital; Club; Sociology; Political science; Political economy; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.04857407959227192,"score_gpt":0.33991598366656905,"score_spread":0.29134190407429716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118134033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816127,0.00069402234,0.000047980844,0.016341135,0.00023415072,0.00016257272,0.000007780191,0.000006650572,0.00089303864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973955,0.00075714546,0.00008296747,0.0010282707,0.0006092904,0.000004584692,3.23111e-7,0.0000054489997,0.000116435716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717695,0.0003250128,0.0005066502,0.000155237,0.0011464512,0.00068973255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985105,0.00066677225,0.00022467527,0.000058788602,0.00032349487,0.00021577823],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044647316,0.00009352643,0.00023235202,0.000048669946,0.0013404775,0.00030204045,0.00067275093,0.00007897247,0.00008113143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015799333,0.00006323803,0.000102588,0.0005144694,0.0048274505,0.00047652784,0.00018810577,0.0004669185,0.0000026497135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015459617,0.00063458097,0.005277035,0.00004103312,0.000063787265,0.00020339778,0.15539676,0.000061105085,0.0010122812,0.8213866,0.0009900487,0.014778786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010071914,0.00017448854,0.8014276,0.00025310653,0.00003086823,0.00014903893,0.07032305,0.000007950144,0.00009488526,0.12585014,0.0005077046,0.00017395255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034515907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011840851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79615057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002578403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009923662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124336077","doi":"10.1017/s000712340500013x","title":"Interpreting a Bill of Rights: The Importance of Legislative Rights Review","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legislature; Legislation; Judgement; Law and economics; Bill of rights; Law; Politics; Fundamental rights; Parliament; Human rights; Premise; State (computer science); Welfare rights; Judicial review; Social rights; Reservation of rights; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.0211615574922424,"score_gpt":0.3325517148328495,"score_spread":0.3113901573406071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124336077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36479378,0.052694917,0.00046671723,0.04872003,0.0006726942,0.00046758688,0.000042653217,0.000016974613,0.53212464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771225,0.000912764,0.00037436924,0.0007017221,0.00026383053,0.0000010115114,4.8776574e-8,0.0000010966712,0.000032898137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978555,0.00013215626,0.00058480725,0.00010756777,0.0009178925,0.00040208572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822533,0.00032620292,0.00038496542,0.00006513399,0.00081124017,0.00018712773],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027865458,0.000058271013,0.0002639546,0.00004039651,0.0006515577,0.000032383705,0.00058160926,0.00002372566,0.00011346022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024327985,0.000035079785,0.00012584473,0.00053124153,0.006000887,0.0004277707,0.00007319123,0.00016433129,0.0000027736148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038403896,0.00005062377,0.0010648356,0.000009180688,0.000011663909,0.000013249454,0.0007270758,8.706712e-7,0.000056741068,0.99491537,0.00072505284,0.0024214827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000382642,0.0002209518,0.04215971,0.010252717,0.0001272545,0.00048745004,0.002102596,0.00002060989,0.0013052156,0.84425426,0.09838395,0.0003026357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020846086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057632984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6329185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013721472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005446046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127216549","doi":"10.1017/s0007123406000408","title":"Truth, Agency and the Hutton Report: A Reply to Diana Coole","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Moral agency; Positivism; Meaning (existential); Focus (optics); Political philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.011647002410267593,"score_gpt":0.3006526339557286,"score_spread":0.289005631545461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127216549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6294457,0.0003532294,0.00057311467,0.011008815,0.00053115294,0.00014690204,0.000007740808,0.000016829272,0.35791653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950633,0.000025036965,0.00034483807,0.0028955115,0.00065379584,0.000002073629,1.3362875e-7,0.0000037485697,0.001011578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972545,0.0003209996,0.00047823798,0.00021167868,0.0007463589,0.0009882231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977789,0.0008243072,0.00013133626,0.00013886769,0.00030413928,0.0008224834],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064695957,0.00007331189,0.00022820561,0.000068921174,0.0010209429,0.0002704378,0.00054145977,0.000059535592,0.00011594661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013413006,0.000058296813,0.0000943739,0.00044005172,0.006637675,0.00034895775,0.000095025105,0.00026638998,0.000012238207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019758136,0.000028729231,0.00027412522,0.000001391851,0.000002682543,0.0005292559,0.00013748983,7.1459726e-7,0.000012456012,0.9968029,0.00029240528,0.0018980758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042414016,0.00004417919,0.10254158,0.00004326208,0.000016714386,0.0024796266,0.00045660455,0.00000715206,0.00009392066,0.8889423,0.004856457,0.000094072915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013432164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023092066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3656176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014344082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062248285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127549877","doi":"10.1017/s0007123405000098","title":"To Adopt or Not to Adopt Proportional Representation: The Politics of Institutional Choice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Democracy; Legislature; Proportional representation; Politics; Political science; Representation (politics); Political economy; Economic history; Public administration; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04554029990027382,"score_gpt":0.37151503882375797,"score_spread":0.32597473892348416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127549877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94659024,0.00006542889,0.0036797314,0.038290616,0.00085600803,0.00038201502,0.00010452583,0.00001495203,0.010016449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920246,0.000009091602,0.002301505,0.0035186543,0.001304087,0.000005343937,3.1318464e-7,0.0000052173373,0.0008311875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99544847,0.000103390696,0.0007298014,0.00023855825,0.0024491227,0.0010306393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99666995,0.00033173224,0.0002209792,0.0001591429,0.0011510687,0.0014671579],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020841155,0.000098444834,0.00024716105,0.00009601331,0.0010069574,0.00023572567,0.0009613986,0.00006144275,0.00011126535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014184182,0.000076126096,0.00011572743,0.001144857,0.0023153063,0.0005845478,0.00013156724,0.00023850998,0.00002653446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018810131,0.00010542697,0.000865481,0.000008169155,0.000005535417,0.000071495946,0.00051656057,0.00018511836,0.0002834894,0.9961739,0.0004952249,0.0012707869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007133176,0.00039892254,0.8990303,0.00069659046,0.000026745593,0.0012032755,0.001450798,0.000008289777,0.0025927688,0.027127754,0.06645871,0.0002924795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041616477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002724188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9690462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008136347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004455564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99411976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129925846","doi":"10.1017/s0007123412000117","title":"Why Do Citizens Discount the Future? Public Opinion and the Timing of Policy Consequences","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Economics; Public economics; Public opinion; Term (time); Consumption (sociology); Public policy; Politics; Causation; Time preference; Political science; Microeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.10372752853824548,"score_gpt":0.40588853933641783,"score_spread":0.30216101079817237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129925846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94791824,0.0019701386,0.0004580531,0.04568646,0.001333264,0.000089549714,0.000021387317,0.0000039297543,0.0025190006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966817,0.00018985472,0.00041011118,0.0017511103,0.0009450452,0.0000010953589,7.983901e-8,0.000004088051,0.000016898199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962253,0.0002961828,0.00092279114,0.00020252407,0.001620139,0.00073306327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954079,0.0025647047,0.0005339175,0.00029134442,0.0006560173,0.0005461446],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014651026,0.00009995684,0.00032837837,0.00023414359,0.00060987315,0.0015251916,0.0016517482,0.000048442842,0.00011850291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012818487,0.000050240145,0.00015316615,0.00088769273,0.007094469,0.0012968607,0.00030814222,0.00028842894,0.000008563823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022341226,0.000064664695,0.0033133647,0.00000197345,0.000005711116,0.0000096263575,0.00046683694,0.0000025682064,0.00016553674,0.7222499,0.0033323672,0.27036506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094020035,0.00013401119,0.13938676,0.00020048607,0.000028670185,0.009431452,0.011626733,0.00017735273,0.00025821425,0.8100639,0.027511057,0.0002411445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005351756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043074193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27012393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010548699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058517157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137365216","doi":"10.1017/s0007123412000737","title":"Political Investment: Remittances and Elections","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Remittance; Politics; Developing country; Investment (military); Economics; Development economics; Foreign direct investment; Political science; Economic growth; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.017466402786076037,"score_gpt":0.3246055706736052,"score_spread":0.30713916788752915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137365216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87426794,0.0007828896,0.00049246,0.005746578,0.00057521585,0.00006712775,0.0000069176754,0.000019437788,0.11804141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960783,0.00009344308,0.0011002412,0.0017738936,0.00060468214,7.288377e-7,1.3685658e-7,0.0000030225292,0.0003455551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788785,0.00011844873,0.00024388188,0.000091312926,0.00062544766,0.0010330479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784863,0.00013081881,0.000070225324,0.00004631763,0.00028331645,0.0016206767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001997239,0.0000509567,0.00010955007,0.0000882081,0.00069122657,0.00025532406,0.00021546698,0.000047199137,0.000094846975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002412449,0.000052242824,0.000038417147,0.0005303475,0.002116809,0.00095120555,0.000029392102,0.00019445179,0.000005147339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010009506,0.00004582618,0.0049423734,0.0000015653137,0.0000018591779,0.0000051943475,0.00053821644,9.701959e-8,0.00013434497,0.9930091,0.0002687697,0.001051642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071055896,0.00022899719,0.5821331,0.00022457037,0.000072625066,0.003454844,0.025861071,0.00021391817,0.0006257684,0.25645566,0.12946369,0.000555213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012016997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011540814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73655343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025042018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005395518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77994704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138082499","doi":"10.1017/s0007123405000347","title":"Opinion–Policy Dynamics: Public Preferences and Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":308,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Notice; Representation (politics); Politics; Public policy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public expenditure; Public economics; Structuring; Government spending; Work (physics); Preference; Public administration; Economics; Political economy; Welfare; Law; Public finance","score_opus":0.09131300604692778,"score_gpt":0.38736357279206474,"score_spread":0.29605056674513697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138082499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9214196,0.00014908679,0.000113174174,0.07161045,0.00018748155,0.00012366199,0.000007029028,0.000011332047,0.0063781645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974731,0.000034687666,0.00010498989,0.0011029321,0.0012495039,0.000004472763,0.0000014256605,0.0000037302643,0.00002514992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967111,0.0005336438,0.00044648358,0.00016396964,0.0009908038,0.0011540111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982766,0.00038664314,0.00013710717,0.000090711124,0.00034236562,0.00076660333],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036609042,0.00008231547,0.00016621778,0.0003404923,0.00067231694,0.001124898,0.0007186677,0.000084998275,0.00006282711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049664634,0.000065029504,0.000045438283,0.0013613652,0.0017947832,0.001244837,0.000052001775,0.00035446775,0.000005577094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013213668,0.00006725476,0.01461345,0.000003897524,0.000001839697,0.0000071739096,0.00053528725,0.0000012204148,0.000009275778,0.9775327,0.0001501796,0.007076441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008774799,0.00031723813,0.72355616,0.00035701864,0.000014071047,0.0009100844,0.011103616,0.00106185,0.000022386557,0.17310543,0.088205956,0.0004687068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06284576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039386686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8044272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051776523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011038654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140944885","doi":"10.1017/s0007123412000555","title":"Auntie Knows Best? Public Broadcasters and Current Affairs Knowledge","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Political science; Independence (probability theory); Test (biology); Public relations; Advertising; Business; Biology","score_opus":0.05608512772890869,"score_gpt":0.37047331796478805,"score_spread":0.3143881902358794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140944885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9285936,0.010559748,0.0001377325,0.002823197,0.0052020275,0.00012298599,0.000010464524,0.000021000458,0.052529257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99612075,0.0005707447,0.00024641244,0.000120398756,0.002802885,0.0000016809956,1.8361402e-7,0.0000074564564,0.00012949783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966178,0.00023788524,0.00036373988,0.00014323505,0.00086228014,0.001775059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99614656,0.0003654078,0.00013038324,0.00007465661,0.00049944187,0.002783562],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022569709,0.00009896473,0.00021983193,0.00016214208,0.0007928156,0.00045411894,0.0004988929,0.00007978798,0.00011176579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047009415,0.0001061252,0.000089256006,0.00060117774,0.0037892065,0.0014098365,0.00011265296,0.00036005938,0.00004287188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022681481,0.00029641052,0.02335458,0.000017889834,0.0000066870384,0.000016101427,0.0068677124,4.116041e-8,0.00008996548,0.8118996,0.0010759854,0.15637279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012793756,0.00034791985,0.13198449,0.0008102765,0.00013111335,0.001545768,0.103748366,0.0000282446,0.00048952136,0.025499098,0.73320025,0.0009356114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010940644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002108604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7864005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038121393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013840084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143620987","doi":"10.1017/s0007123402000169","title":"Review Article: Understanding the Regulatory State","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":419,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regulatory state; State (computer science); Political science; Politics; Government (linguistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Subject (documents); Government regulation; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; China; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.06861989147344283,"score_gpt":0.2740634953603053,"score_spread":0.20544360388686245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143620987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53270715,0.08065357,0.009698347,0.1373681,0.002597863,0.00071252155,0.000003991175,0.00014059345,0.23611788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98944193,0.00061857095,0.00003756606,0.009405448,0.0003473464,6.809797e-7,3.2628904e-8,0.0000036457502,0.00014476258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874085,0.00001055644,0.0002845316,0.000093031296,0.0004799974,0.00039105123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943185,0.00003736635,0.00015706067,0.000089022324,0.00024179483,0.000042929154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010635712,0.000054085092,0.00012240508,0.00005232605,0.0004593972,0.00039365317,0.0003307486,0.000008034016,0.00028679793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005288873,0.00004035812,0.000061945924,0.0005614273,0.0006720993,0.00096360216,0.00008393056,0.00011791109,0.00006022446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026626428,0.00005676108,0.0017836357,0.00018223784,0.000011665348,0.00006511102,0.000026532509,0.00001708391,0.00014149013,0.91044253,0.058218755,0.029051553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075237703,0.000032864806,0.586897,0.005648602,0.000107815125,0.0014834418,0.0012046092,0.0048652827,0.000046531175,0.34166762,0.05684897,0.00044485644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040049814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011421105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5851134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009485646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019506018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37960064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145631578","doi":"10.1017/s0007123405000220","title":"When Far Apart Becomes Too Far Apart: Evidence for a Threshold Effect in Coalition Formation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Imperfect; Government (linguistics); Structuring; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07822259171328162,"score_gpt":0.40073418096390506,"score_spread":0.32251158925062345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145631578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97557133,0.0006151751,0.0033426045,0.016409066,0.00042587367,0.0006458461,0.00001527292,0.00002855754,0.0029462632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969597,0.00003452031,0.00054099405,0.0015035912,0.0007784746,0.000028050135,0.000001178501,0.0000068145896,0.00014668054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965332,0.00029587458,0.00075070217,0.0002102328,0.0009902323,0.0012197386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977442,0.0008198113,0.0002079493,0.00009826235,0.00044956995,0.0006801919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062901294,0.000111353365,0.00030294483,0.00016040367,0.00051737175,0.00043271927,0.00044021622,0.00010259394,0.000069468646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051072594,0.000111176545,0.00013515084,0.0004223605,0.00071337353,0.0027571754,0.000033802666,0.00022423819,0.000023165057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086281856,0.00018853985,0.014809543,0.00010592799,0.000008244181,0.000023903393,0.0017578583,0.00007829601,0.0024257589,0.9573856,0.0042716744,0.018858379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005476655,0.003620704,0.56311363,0.0047289473,0.00023295464,0.00078783196,0.0023161736,0.012518896,0.017111348,0.29117593,0.09703694,0.0018799909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070090536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0103387935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66620964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009078642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004728198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148578131","doi":"10.1017/s0007123415000368","title":"Unity in Diversity? The Development of Political Parties in the Parliament of Canada, 1867–2011","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; House of Commons; Political science; Incentive; Voting; Consolidation (business); Political economy; Politics; Public administration; Cohesion (chemistry); Commons; Diversity (politics); Economics; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.08685958456956185,"score_gpt":0.331835033292249,"score_spread":0.24497544872268717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148578131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894106,0.00006210607,0.000028539434,0.005701556,0.00015091467,0.00010759665,0.0000048225465,0.0000012669866,0.0045326375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995619,0.0000011427,0.000069953734,0.00025123372,0.00007935792,0.00000186066,1.213912e-7,0.0000016383791,0.00003277485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630016,0.0005423753,0.0006361027,0.00009131274,0.0015425411,0.0008875082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839497,0.0004293621,0.00015016145,0.000084734325,0.00042155207,0.00051922444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007142515,0.000059477006,0.00020328532,0.00006439561,0.00033367396,0.000050602306,0.0006793258,0.00003900257,0.00002340165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002478081,0.000042022108,0.000035805762,0.0004350736,0.0014844113,0.00021989725,0.00011533239,0.00018168446,9.630763e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011588384,0.00014617102,0.1357516,0.000011581995,0.000003688775,0.000024647261,0.0074310442,0.000010588398,0.000032873108,0.8557978,0.00031736773,0.0004610178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024789717,0.00007756744,0.9533876,0.00012386413,0.000007563075,0.000021670563,0.02069211,0.00001856104,0.0005380065,0.02428861,0.0005192064,0.00007733325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8671481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8861524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83150923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008050756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004871573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8641961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152786995","doi":"10.1017/s0007123411000238","title":"The New Regionalism and Policy Interdependence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Regionalism (politics); Argument (complex analysis); International trade; International economics; Economics; Competition (biology); Competition policy; Market access; Trade diversion; Economic integration; Political science; International free trade agreement; Geography; Politics; European union","score_opus":0.07247812081627134,"score_gpt":0.24658402408725272,"score_spread":0.17410590327098138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152786995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8320609,0.0060326923,0.0021410114,0.016930886,0.0011619482,0.000105398,0.000033624598,0.000014287924,0.1415193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997104,0.00056336925,0.0008973626,0.0008437842,0.00025384704,3.0024827e-7,4.6897906e-8,0.0000039774322,0.00033335178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998807,0.000007128727,0.00046062292,0.00015472317,0.000058533038,0.00051199936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906397,0.000050390394,0.00019967597,0.00010310154,0.00005247231,0.0005304161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010587791,0.000057927213,0.00015422776,0.00009142234,0.00022466278,0.0002546959,0.0005659788,0.00003278042,0.00005490646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009014103,0.000056382924,0.000060168506,0.0001864919,0.0007430053,0.00050373503,0.00009953242,0.00016330341,0.000043204054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038563007,0.000012169313,0.001995639,0.0000011274135,0.0000042812503,0.000021022754,0.00007767843,1.6928774e-7,0.0000049201058,0.99374443,0.0006779767,0.003456736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018418094,0.00006422919,0.22733338,0.000024888112,0.000001807351,0.00232516,0.00011726403,0.000035052566,0.000060760343,0.7586457,0.0111237895,0.00008377129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035455534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000088650304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23509872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012209258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018994632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.535984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170928462","doi":"10.1017/s0007123404220178","title":"Which Matters Most? Comparing the Impact of Issues and the Economy in American, British and Canadian Elections","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Voting; Position (finance); Positive economics; Political science; Democracy; Affect (linguistics); Economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019540387400468366,"score_gpt":0.3411408780964516,"score_spread":0.32160049069598323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170928462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97432345,0.00024513144,0.000017029772,0.022432392,0.00004218694,0.000105525054,0.0000038349976,0.0000022602533,0.0028281682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994087,0.000046154302,0.000028088154,0.00038965268,0.00010845642,0.000002139511,8.763324e-8,0.0000025628194,0.000014122945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860376,0.00016902878,0.00029896182,0.000095821284,0.00021395563,0.0006184667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891746,0.00018639198,0.00009797935,0.00004757447,0.00022579308,0.000524818],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018484262,0.000047969937,0.0001930244,0.000069603964,0.0005519828,0.00042641987,0.00021505656,0.000022492868,0.000012663597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090955687,0.00003735798,0.00003549431,0.000628881,0.003262216,0.0003332736,0.000021451093,0.0001873673,6.4377093e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011334383,0.000047324553,0.26100156,0.000008515203,0.000018166382,0.000022023518,0.002016081,0.00019793845,0.000075416094,0.733747,0.0003196934,0.002534981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035336617,0.000065628476,0.96463686,0.00010857694,0.000007928638,0.0003177555,0.0009693848,0.00010172245,0.000015660346,0.03321074,0.00015479278,0.00005757543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98700505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93608695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70363533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040580131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010246955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172010066","doi":"10.1017/s0007123408000318","title":"Cabinet Reshuffles and Ministerial Drift","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Delegation; Public administration; Democracy; Prime minister; Political science; Moral hazard; Work (physics); Agency (philosophy); Law and economics; Political economy; Incentive; Economics; Law; Sociology; Engineering; Politics; Market economy; Social science","score_opus":0.05716686477235682,"score_gpt":0.3888301780727658,"score_spread":0.331663313300409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172010066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9353391,0.00009168801,0.000034488046,0.009434588,0.00021453472,0.00004657232,0.000010653969,0.000008435923,0.054819945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973297,0.00013295563,0.00042113278,0.00046927985,0.0007202107,6.299833e-7,1.614246e-7,0.0000023652794,0.0009235632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977451,0.00014552288,0.000267396,0.00012527923,0.0009857311,0.0007309871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982469,0.00018244458,0.000073939234,0.00005505527,0.0003224553,0.0011192191],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023376823,0.00004640651,0.00012288135,0.00010300161,0.0011073449,0.00036047754,0.00042848752,0.000046664354,0.00015396393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004836374,0.00004833144,0.000038183225,0.00035949977,0.00531502,0.0006556828,0.000060884922,0.0001840495,0.0000050366148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015206113,0.00008140109,0.0017228513,0.0000040102664,0.0000033391132,0.0005264286,0.0009779864,1.332192e-7,0.0010763934,0.9877653,0.0038311507,0.003995801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015246604,0.00065942924,0.71713704,0.00017591991,0.000014309469,0.014204996,0.0059638964,0.000037978116,0.001810933,0.040560547,0.2174505,0.00045977932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003860774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054369523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94720477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008572191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002528783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99739194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775364846","doi":"10.1017/s0007123417000667","title":"For and Against Brexit: A Survey Experiment of the Impact of Campaign Effects on Public Attitudes toward EU Membership","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Kent; London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Referendum; Brexit; Salience (neuroscience); Framing (construction); European union; Political science; Public opinion; Panel survey; Panel data; Public support; Member states; Economics; International economics; Public relations; Demographic economics; Psychology; Engineering; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.10831854998605962,"score_gpt":0.4238999545182734,"score_spread":0.3155814045322138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775364846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973854,0.000071253125,0.00007123539,0.00080200034,0.00021007411,0.00026758536,0.00002012619,0.0000031654263,0.001169152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999494,0.000003091362,0.0000750748,0.00012408906,0.0002805088,0.000004089024,1.8628526e-7,0.000004146973,0.000014810551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977692,0.00040074904,0.00037289978,0.00012656962,0.000684808,0.00064579217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976584,0.00071830256,0.00021222112,0.00008818061,0.0007857913,0.000537129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038748237,0.000071793205,0.00023396123,0.000059270456,0.00031496875,0.00012436618,0.0003560795,0.000053758682,0.000019883277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066236085,0.000051309908,0.00012729657,0.00038525136,0.002286497,0.0002468237,0.00004063549,0.00009341979,6.9138065e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009573706,0.00042076802,0.16133668,0.00013510973,0.000049947084,0.0000048066076,0.0028902078,0.0000043197283,0.014577668,0.81688607,0.0003207444,0.003277927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037777072,0.0010498853,0.9728732,0.00043101178,0.000009003991,0.000013937465,0.00016021848,0.000014720478,0.016126353,0.008833559,0.000026376183,0.0000839382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02684936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025857878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81153655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033072592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010786642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97963095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799294677","doi":"10.1017/s0007123418000236","title":"Do Voters Benchmark Economic Performance?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmark (surveying); Computer science; Content (measure theory); Geography; Mathematics; Cartography","score_opus":0.019179745485125757,"score_gpt":0.3193083145580545,"score_spread":0.30012856907292873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799294677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95411646,0.00005171006,0.000016472695,0.001242762,0.0009788241,0.00008984944,0.0000031393427,0.0000087484295,0.043492053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986301,0.000013636163,0.00009170823,0.00021285265,0.0006084315,9.2406003e-7,1.8097155e-7,0.0000043723367,0.00043780147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997693,0.00011144081,0.00040009568,0.00015381775,0.0006442214,0.0009974063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985934,0.00013726913,0.0001288381,0.00008897061,0.00021691395,0.00083462114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026250558,0.00006439673,0.000183548,0.000088641675,0.00036323362,0.0003585179,0.00045284873,0.000057099383,0.00088409754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047405425,0.00006629965,0.00008125673,0.00023027144,0.000851164,0.0009155657,0.00003440583,0.00019176822,0.00022732845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008671175,0.000039370047,0.08687799,0.000014364552,0.000005766226,0.000016565815,0.0003130593,0.000026270061,0.0005960751,0.9035297,0.0005412246,0.0080309445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000631416,0.00049958733,0.9560651,0.00039589024,0.000023651775,0.00038409492,0.0010276883,0.0003478809,0.00092846464,0.023216803,0.016089898,0.00038949988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0090521695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005460755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8803129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000626344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009593579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810451199","doi":"10.1017/s0007123417000606","title":"Tones from a Narrowing Race: Polling and Online Political Communication during the 2014 Scottish Referendum Campaign","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Polling; Politics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Democracy; Independence (probability theory); Political communication; General election; Media studies; Political economy; Advertising; Sociology; Law; Geography; Business; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.028527672365760096,"score_gpt":0.3414500811412588,"score_spread":0.3129224087754987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810451199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857907,0.000877155,0.000063753316,0.010013573,0.00065998925,0.00009541104,0.000041016458,0.00002314577,0.0024352307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99446803,0.00024242015,0.0011956141,0.0009819475,0.0030104623,0.0000014187959,0.0000011552047,0.000010346458,0.00008861756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965262,0.0005021814,0.00048285662,0.00020683675,0.0009932864,0.001288638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693495,0.0009668991,0.00016988494,0.00019382563,0.000643953,0.0010904924],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018410692,0.000110108915,0.00025290003,0.000089433386,0.0023914299,0.00058720325,0.0008967351,0.00011690417,0.000118278425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052605434,0.000100980644,0.00007914922,0.0003915395,0.006783432,0.0006538041,0.00017965102,0.0005148585,0.000010212378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002208829,0.000121756624,0.024022587,0.000010636294,0.000023066783,0.0000613543,0.010900449,2.202234e-7,0.002422227,0.95794064,0.00039616507,0.0040788124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001030264,0.00021229642,0.74793935,0.00095232896,0.000116421135,0.00073892734,0.11771835,0.000064483014,0.003653306,0.119452104,0.0075936047,0.00052857463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034995243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046839532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8384885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036617846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007973247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890816858","doi":"10.1017/s0007123408000306","title":"How's Your Government? International Evidence Linking Good Government and Well-Being","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Trustworthiness; World Values Survey; Hierarchy; Good governance; Public economics; Per capita; Corporate governance; Value (mathematics); Balance (ability); Quality (philosophy); Business; Democracy; Economics; Life satisfaction; Politics; Political science; Finance; Psychology","score_opus":0.03761590881104149,"score_gpt":0.24903461516845743,"score_spread":0.21141870635741594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890816858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8722894,0.0028057906,0.0042509153,0.010663285,0.0033505934,0.00019820665,0.00032932253,0.000016820002,0.10609565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943368,0.0017694968,0.0014263451,0.0006811074,0.0012510581,0.0000036237886,9.443867e-7,0.000019219899,0.0005114468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969512,0.00003519287,0.0010576737,0.0006119153,0.0004964429,0.0008475801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979027,0.00015806186,0.0009926197,0.00022763957,0.00008430826,0.0006346802],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00268964,0.00022735211,0.0005926411,0.00010864741,0.00025848043,0.0012680948,0.0012453266,0.00018577602,0.000044310727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019246445,0.0002921869,0.00022542091,0.00011947835,0.0007526853,0.0011755774,0.0011507908,0.0009331669,0.000020995914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021455298,0.0001923386,0.076759435,0.00016016676,0.0001307042,0.00043589415,0.0004635295,0.000055153658,0.00008929986,0.9102686,0.0006607891,0.010762621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000813035,0.0001846848,0.48084563,0.0021455677,0.000032360924,0.0038866356,0.00036487772,0.003672185,0.00045856365,0.5000407,0.006698574,0.0008571996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037581328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013395779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41022792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016532952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015241638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907118461","doi":"10.1017/s0007123418000303","title":"Compulsory Voting: A Defence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Voting; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Coercion (linguistics); Presidential system; Political economy; Margin (machine learning); Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05815346936181888,"score_gpt":0.36522076396790865,"score_spread":0.3070672946060898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907118461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5987308,0.00020376759,0.003124072,0.018902717,0.0017934706,0.00010681445,0.000008576312,0.000054491877,0.37707528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99349,0.000013522019,0.0013786525,0.0025758704,0.0024052004,3.4842373e-7,5.8893086e-8,0.000004992033,0.00013134615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647003,0.00020671576,0.00040206526,0.00018940434,0.0013701642,0.001361641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996623,0.00042638046,0.00012573448,0.0000921211,0.0011774241,0.0015553498],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004672355,0.00007587998,0.00018370445,0.00010550738,0.0014216851,0.00034601032,0.0010090583,0.000091954025,0.0001996984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010427377,0.0000816914,0.00010050272,0.0006660759,0.01301852,0.0006976768,0.00010815531,0.0004745477,0.000081176586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044857,0.000053286505,0.00033595733,0.0000031405698,0.0000022876177,0.000076165976,0.000593237,2.543142e-7,0.00016278561,0.9960704,0.00026825455,0.0024297428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038846434,0.00039633154,0.061077822,0.00037166983,0.0000261834,0.0012348323,0.002351418,0.00010785028,0.0009964908,0.9172811,0.0154299,0.00033792306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023866447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029342755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3947592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028591644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016321513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908267360","doi":"10.1017/s000712341800042x","title":"Are Transfer-Dependent Governments More Creditworthy? Reassessing the Fiscal Federal Foundations of Subnational Default Risk","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Bailout; Transfer payment; Economics; Probability of default; Revenue; Payment; Business; Financial system; Monetary economics; Finance; Credit risk; Macroeconomics; Financial crisis; Market economy","score_opus":0.024679423093557713,"score_gpt":0.3305317794635554,"score_spread":0.3058523563699977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908267360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97188747,0.00008543375,0.017617032,0.0031136856,0.0006605129,0.00011498458,0.00006900479,0.000008551847,0.00644335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998455,0.000099782585,0.00025371014,0.00035969165,0.00071586354,0.0000012423166,7.489799e-7,0.00000454986,0.00010939921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961908,0.00016042103,0.00043624063,0.00015782719,0.0025027436,0.000551973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984373,0.00018802208,0.0003175712,0.00008568982,0.0006699136,0.00030152698],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019013982,0.000071940376,0.00014600539,0.000036683876,0.0015074814,0.00038353394,0.00052784354,0.000055507127,0.00014255759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024622541,0.00006166318,0.00009409619,0.0004573422,0.002799692,0.000887454,0.000043752352,0.0001880159,0.000004495145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073708856,0.0005650628,0.3209025,0.000013790549,0.00004744918,0.00007929661,0.0024307203,0.00009362584,0.00060475897,0.6501967,0.002099588,0.022892825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003667477,0.000070402224,0.98217213,0.00014280237,0.000031918356,0.0000664287,0.0030920242,0.00026483356,0.0005729819,0.011591933,0.0015285712,0.00009923118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023729214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021757192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66126966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005026426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062062615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975499287","doi":"10.1017/s0007123419000231","title":"Stuck in the middle: Ideology, valence and the electoral failures of centrist parties","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Political science; Political economy; Voting; Politics; Democracy; German; Economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.032400995178615714,"score_gpt":0.32481556705902986,"score_spread":0.29241457188041414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975499287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887665,0.00061448856,0.000013989307,0.008523258,0.00018252115,0.00017986936,0.000003318753,0.0000026864243,0.0017133777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99932724,0.000026578127,0.000026317057,0.00037121915,0.00015748605,0.0000024066624,8.28693e-8,0.0000020142872,0.00008664227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973304,0.0006830148,0.0004340931,0.000111511275,0.0007525722,0.00068838574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983989,0.00090597535,0.00015813824,0.0000870928,0.0002501278,0.00019976254],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054404065,0.000056914232,0.0002141515,0.000050008344,0.0002695863,0.00017691175,0.00054447324,0.00004470932,0.00005236159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026655032,0.000035679022,0.000056634162,0.00045388518,0.0041778283,0.00033550934,0.00004001811,0.00023896381,0.000004184252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001941135,0.000033991895,0.08832096,0.000012750774,0.0000026999398,0.000008248434,0.0013663261,0.0000021105732,0.00013365533,0.9095325,0.00010810629,0.0004592503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010003501,0.00023193126,0.8817964,0.00026383548,0.000024410036,0.00021544681,0.005478611,0.00007960072,0.00029363055,0.10903203,0.0014553458,0.00012838209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039538927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00727452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80050045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007781979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003391529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977839676","doi":"10.1017/s0007123419000127","title":"Voters Punish Politicians with Depression","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Depression (economics); Political science; Internet privacy; Business; Psychology; Computer security; Computer science; Law and economics; Economics; Mathematics; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.01101432091072875,"score_gpt":0.3141470751231363,"score_spread":0.30313275421240754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977839676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79658127,0.0004012113,0.00088414334,0.0022097703,0.002642221,0.00009376576,0.0000044571357,0.000017358789,0.1971658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995255,0.000005429004,0.0007751634,0.002017837,0.00045412383,0.000001011118,2.1487074e-7,0.000009347921,0.0014818939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974273,0.00011780017,0.0003727055,0.0002615675,0.000861976,0.0009586689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793667,0.0002715095,0.00019423397,0.00018235763,0.00022028737,0.0011949559],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011448979,0.00009411121,0.00022700072,0.000109167915,0.00017137348,0.00010205582,0.00056872185,0.000079366815,0.0015164933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000692141,0.00007763572,0.000074745985,0.0003963201,0.00085459696,0.00058916083,0.000040918436,0.00059824635,0.00022500042],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000477438,0.0015160888,0.06426382,0.000058044778,0.00008112985,0.0030404404,0.00074858457,0.0000071654244,0.0023967293,0.8564927,0.015002604,0.055915233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032976458,0.0022768793,0.8740559,0.00081038335,0.00012575783,0.028170086,0.0036189603,0.000025994423,0.00030850325,0.011623444,0.075093694,0.000592721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001073407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030580668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84486926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017445398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037467352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981363627","doi":"10.1017/s0007123419000462","title":"Does Electing Extremist Parties Increase Violence and Intolerance?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer security; Internet privacy; Content (measure theory); Business; Political science; Computer science; Criminology; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009307994396940703,"score_gpt":0.2882361888342629,"score_spread":0.2789281944373222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981363627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942656,0.0006013848,0.00016420403,0.0012665353,0.0009172369,0.000110349145,0.0000079242645,0.000027004327,0.002639718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976919,0.0006794544,0.00012693732,0.00067416293,0.00064064265,0.000002001899,1.4136675e-7,0.000008155971,0.00017659957],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965601,0.00020045083,0.0005107551,0.00032477916,0.0010494953,0.0013544095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975821,0.0003982267,0.00018267395,0.00014114183,0.00047073673,0.0012251411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002688098,0.00013492198,0.00030388616,0.00010694291,0.00065088423,0.000539459,0.0006981486,0.00008664351,0.00024519727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024366027,0.000108291046,0.00008656825,0.00039549245,0.0026329367,0.0011414808,0.000110468434,0.00042358396,0.000017712291],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016517959,0.00055507635,0.36610764,0.00025031055,0.00004860091,0.00088748126,0.032762572,0.0000069387556,0.011742834,0.20692648,0.00031391173,0.380233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019786318,0.00070989906,0.6854031,0.009193115,0.000109404755,0.002456717,0.18631288,0.0005639682,0.0045855423,0.10167558,0.005415011,0.0015961376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012152542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008028168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37863684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026198762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007603787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000159853","doi":"10.1017/s0007123419000644","title":"The Cultural Sources of the Gender Gap in Voter Turnout","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Tampereen Yliopisto","keywords":"Parliament; Gender gap; Turnout; Voting; Voter turnout; Context (archaeology); Political science; Politics; Demographic economics; Economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.06059909287288986,"score_gpt":0.3437625384576921,"score_spread":0.2831634455848023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000159853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.962541,0.00025195317,0.00003007698,0.024054375,0.00030660903,0.000072140014,0.0000027237693,0.000002692988,0.012738416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988127,0.00004943939,0.000052946012,0.00067536725,0.00032430858,4.2599842e-7,2.9264685e-8,0.00000212485,0.00008268751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979684,0.00019222652,0.0003169037,0.00009604123,0.0008983869,0.0005280413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990391,0.00014397006,0.00013344618,0.000061426574,0.00028756235,0.0003344583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012862891,0.00004322227,0.00009729892,0.000021575062,0.000551145,0.0002548382,0.00074709306,0.000031693537,0.000020432642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022080403,0.000025618765,0.00009231783,0.00041552837,0.002255808,0.00024980752,0.00008901022,0.00021980473,0.000001954082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011317639,0.000058691356,0.039711732,0.000012195688,0.000010228479,0.00004436926,0.021233827,0.00005402591,0.0017956207,0.9324909,0.00083040696,0.0037467047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034988712,0.000059680046,0.88236254,0.00007083804,0.000015217707,0.00020087964,0.04297982,0.00014127085,0.0019289816,0.06866426,0.003108387,0.000118203876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031346711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051461125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86382663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082457984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005119423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83116186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001418019","doi":"10.1017/s0007123420000113","title":"Party Cues in the News: Democratic Elites, Republican Backlash, and the Dynamics of Climate Skepticism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Elite; Public opinion; Climate change; Political science; Democracy; Construct (python library); Backlash; Dynamics (music); Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15063448832319962,"score_gpt":0.39569718074988997,"score_spread":0.24506269242669035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001418019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7767969,0.0005330251,0.00011720994,0.18639016,0.00009236769,0.00020692301,0.000022601213,0.0000088856095,0.03583197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98927957,0.006889243,0.00022753645,0.003463195,0.00012240549,0.0000017806118,0.000001053603,0.000002478626,0.000012765657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979532,0.0005682009,0.0004146175,0.00010150985,0.00056907214,0.00039342328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985599,0.00067324075,0.00017199104,0.00012139619,0.00021706754,0.00025641316],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004401724,0.0000502607,0.00016695436,0.000041009065,0.0004578236,0.00030224063,0.0008057358,0.00003378089,0.00011495082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041347668,0.000034079058,0.000056462628,0.00060726627,0.0033367933,0.000362624,0.00010923927,0.00025787938,0.0000013686848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023519335,0.000058201687,0.006280473,0.000017399027,0.0000025474048,0.000009438433,0.015478016,0.000001519621,0.00004520047,0.93674374,0.00030556708,0.041034363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026643337,0.0003402768,0.6125432,0.00059889193,0.00007940412,0.00058325037,0.23513548,0.010083665,0.000016362239,0.12893604,0.008641446,0.00037763073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028550164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007998607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80780774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087394226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018792826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008344500","doi":"10.1017/s0007123419000632","title":"Primaries Through the Looking Glass: The Electoral Effects of Opening the Selection of Top Candidates","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Primary election; Politics; Political science; General election; Positive economics; Economics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.023547724813362682,"score_gpt":0.330253372151148,"score_spread":0.30670564733778527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008344500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98192775,0.00039492594,0.0005851553,0.015000878,0.00024493568,0.00022903158,0.0000025481825,0.00000677226,0.001607995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874985,0.000010517709,0.000067855755,0.00063245173,0.0005047591,0.0000030279994,9.954558e-8,0.0000039810957,0.000027431297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745554,0.0004900091,0.0004497412,0.00010960056,0.0008991032,0.00059603254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780065,0.0011786614,0.0002883809,0.00007281028,0.00045762246,0.00020190243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019270668,0.00006831064,0.0002016888,0.000017033324,0.00092673453,0.00024887398,0.0006978881,0.00004022917,0.000033329237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005719498,0.00003782466,0.00009244732,0.00079573033,0.0023659726,0.00045907334,0.00006700652,0.0002848105,0.0000014534876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030510462,0.000051027975,0.036814176,0.00006800215,0.0000307652,0.000010752342,0.0066087157,0.000030207464,0.016094841,0.937155,0.00065378606,0.0024522387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011194376,0.0018082595,0.6933811,0.0012464056,0.00034195973,0.0004471352,0.0077442853,0.0012082761,0.21554506,0.06622224,0.010419458,0.0005164474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036340933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019150457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87093276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012056717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007214844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97007614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012475823","doi":"10.1017/s0007123419000589","title":"Material Interests, Identity and Linked Fate in Three Countries","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bridge (graph theory); Identity (music); Social psychology; Politics; Ethnic group; Social identity theory; Cognition; Collective identity; Social identity approach; Psychology; Observational study; Religious identity; Social group; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04670030608121272,"score_gpt":0.3248662557795621,"score_spread":0.27816594969834935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012475823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866194,0.00025927322,0.000107897555,0.00790394,0.00033705082,0.00006313092,0.0000087578555,0.000009060678,0.004691467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979841,0.0003459246,0.00027614998,0.0009953249,0.0003757938,6.9347846e-7,1.2844211e-7,0.0000020259367,0.000019865263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861187,0.00004382236,0.00031927225,0.00014285947,0.00040510608,0.00047704324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992271,0.000057868067,0.000085664644,0.000024586443,0.0001708225,0.00043394932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011890767,0.000056990713,0.0001854363,0.000044438,0.00040781734,0.0006110064,0.0003276016,0.000036122674,0.000114228904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014335287,0.000058047277,0.000028534241,0.00023549875,0.0016367676,0.0010689939,0.00013408337,0.00013632978,0.0000076285987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033575052,0.00004546143,0.16244884,0.00002813838,0.000012692205,0.00031656455,0.007174255,5.4277706e-7,0.00021656817,0.82578284,0.0008928369,0.003047676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035293432,0.000050383478,0.95382494,0.00011527998,0.0000064626606,0.00008590168,0.005178528,0.000006769007,0.00009025942,0.034608748,0.0055476944,0.00013212646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033470609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009940064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79137605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001304723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003485008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60307384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038826502","doi":"10.1017/s0007123420000071","title":"Addressing Monotone Likelihood in Duration Modelling of Political Events","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Covariate; Duration (music); Monotone polygon; Econometrics; Monotonic function; Maximum likelihood; Accelerated failure time model; Mathematics; Exposition (narrative); Statistics; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.13255069610412182,"score_gpt":0.38279499767642106,"score_spread":0.25024430157229927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038826502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98240185,0.000093505136,0.007616021,0.0071239863,0.00015749664,0.00012806998,0.0000070358165,0.000009994787,0.0024620597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984533,0.000006710619,0.00064360513,0.00039338085,0.0004866384,0.0000015676792,3.7958185e-7,0.0000060436996,0.000008352606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644583,0.00027358104,0.00085702474,0.0001776949,0.0010714792,0.0011743953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977378,0.00019471337,0.00020673465,0.000057233396,0.00047805105,0.0013254271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020689226,0.000078679535,0.00028437906,0.0001024151,0.00023321097,0.00011828604,0.0003498501,0.00008443286,0.000048809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029712415,0.00008581399,0.00008622373,0.00071295875,0.0007147051,0.00075899856,0.000040472303,0.0002852046,0.0000061663613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022249604,0.0001369573,0.013620243,0.000035602698,0.0000043370906,0.000047105226,0.0009718286,0.00023147707,0.0029367732,0.9806655,0.000025726134,0.0013021809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029900065,0.0012870821,0.49613264,0.0031010217,0.000111810994,0.00030302687,0.0069776466,0.050786477,0.019741178,0.41699526,0.00050979474,0.0010640409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021322282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008180813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5636703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034005637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008908804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135408956","doi":"10.1017/s0007123420000721","title":"Do Investor–State Disputes (Still) Harm FDI?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Harm; Foreign direct investment; Business; State (computer science); Investment (military); International investment; Monetary economics; Investor protection; International economics; Economics; Market economy; Law; Corporate governance; Political science; Finance; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.019405977328806494,"score_gpt":0.25832776030522114,"score_spread":0.23892178297641464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135408956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83405423,0.00020732803,0.00047934015,0.006541134,0.0012409702,0.00005124743,0.000005467718,0.000024494291,0.15739581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97011006,0.000013007143,0.00060712366,0.027931942,0.00091128453,7.2639085e-7,0.0000017571513,0.000006241386,0.00041788342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983059,0.000010926256,0.0003508142,0.00016216394,0.0007444776,0.00042569326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986548,0.000038049646,0.00016025998,0.00007093016,0.0009689545,0.00010701387],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006486865,0.000074341224,0.00012556488,0.00012301987,0.00018523807,0.0012774847,0.0003589846,0.000019547057,0.00056220655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013670576,0.00007456122,0.00008275822,0.00045146895,0.0004743968,0.0021826683,0.00012502816,0.00016740002,0.00011004257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030844355,0.00007731181,0.000902631,0.000011670922,0.000005498167,0.00031071372,0.000010587583,0.0000050464305,0.0026396331,0.9928868,0.0019671628,0.0011798973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013630427,0.000054637905,0.25977886,0.00063511246,0.000056668672,0.0030629444,0.0004038229,0.0026022857,0.011016342,0.46813828,0.25230783,0.0005801597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028542246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043154505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5247485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009052826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002429947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135669602","doi":"10.1017/s0007123420000757","title":"Incumbents Beware: The Impact of Offshoring on Elections","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"New York University Abu Dhabi; Harvard University; University of Oxford; York University; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; Yale University","keywords":"Offshoring; Globalization; Government (linguistics); Politics; Democracy; Production (economics); Business; Political economy; Economics; Market economy; Political science; Marketing; Law; Outsourcing; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.028476333229542825,"score_gpt":0.3661992779293446,"score_spread":0.33772294469980174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135669602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8990288,0.0001462099,0.00007700103,0.0014071307,0.00025359786,0.000032203774,0.0000147502715,0.000005194786,0.09903512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857175,0.00013009961,0.00006121962,0.00030536595,0.00035255367,2.3259821e-7,7.350276e-8,0.000003399005,0.00057527923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980718,0.00021422081,0.00027490503,0.000105683575,0.00080303184,0.0005303549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859875,0.0002510249,0.00016103327,0.00010088611,0.0005281507,0.00036016037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001588795,0.000048935894,0.0001186474,0.00004597503,0.00064655556,0.00016370445,0.00051798817,0.000023940316,0.000119011886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00558864,0.000039617684,0.0001452683,0.00083307526,0.001216381,0.00031881168,0.000058600624,0.0002669737,0.000006381329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007089132,0.00016729666,0.004231739,0.0000023356806,0.000012675075,0.00012874811,0.00060953107,0.000052401338,0.0016284983,0.98607415,0.0013162857,0.00576925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021079535,0.00017220707,0.97816277,0.00021211628,0.000010242839,0.00059451157,0.0008922994,0.000012221831,0.0038834368,0.012259948,0.003495132,0.000094331706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00962117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061337085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.973931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027938903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014822365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204177307","doi":"10.1017/s0007123421000405","title":"Global Capital Cycles and Market Discipline: Perceptions of Developing-Country Borrowers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Global Financial Crisis and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Market liquidity; Capital market; Conditionality; Bond market; Developing country; Financial market; Bond; Business; Debt; Financial system; Emerging markets; Monetary economics; International economics; Economics; Finance; Politics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.010754503575440845,"score_gpt":0.25672403006490446,"score_spread":0.24596952648946363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204177307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98109555,0.002059999,0.00064342737,0.0011602241,0.00032035043,0.000023555614,0.00040590783,0.0000032012988,0.014287794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733335,0.00039999842,0.0018100211,0.00027356032,0.000112384005,3.840053e-7,9.175985e-7,0.0000033424783,0.000066057284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866724,0.000012812286,0.0005672353,0.00017617471,0.0001228772,0.00045364533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991915,0.00003418522,0.000187899,0.0000840195,0.00022004585,0.00028231088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063839793,0.00007332942,0.0002882169,0.000066278655,0.00017897676,0.00017471283,0.00023413889,0.000047389498,0.00015519708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009526391,0.000087139764,0.00008176873,0.0004780119,0.00077980524,0.00035621919,0.00012643667,0.00009424268,0.0000056788726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002954805,0.00003996509,0.0903926,0.000014080025,0.0000056937456,0.000041482323,0.00007499451,0.0000021494757,0.00003900918,0.9078466,0.0008618508,0.0006786061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015965637,0.00003447422,0.9103211,0.0000671083,0.000004967679,0.0010658427,0.0007305217,0.0000224415,0.000040779723,0.086169645,0.0012807159,0.00010271333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001165992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028028284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82167697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019552352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027804504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35534564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200118932","doi":"10.1017/s0007123421000557","title":"Phantom Pains: The Effect of Police Killings of Black Americans on Black British Attitudes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Diaspora; Politics; Metropolitan area; White (mutation); Political science; Race (biology); Gender studies; Racial politics; Sociology; History; Law","score_opus":0.031897834475311915,"score_gpt":0.38067847328936505,"score_spread":0.34878063881405313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200118932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827575,0.00010046272,0.00009926682,0.0024031803,0.00020202134,0.00009070915,0.000037656882,0.000008128203,0.014301086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99770296,0.00057928223,0.00022804717,0.000739257,0.00043356046,8.8001116e-7,3.770169e-7,0.000007435252,0.0003082162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966257,0.0006417279,0.0005172323,0.00019784563,0.0012592165,0.0007582319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967332,0.0016138843,0.00038264596,0.00016417881,0.00061456783,0.00049151503],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037285597,0.00009400199,0.00035208,0.00007862508,0.0005195744,0.00030560154,0.00077043613,0.000062259285,0.0002553876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042675263,0.000087464854,0.00021697217,0.0010279065,0.0064385417,0.00047710584,0.00008299609,0.0003601061,0.000011031899],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033765394,0.0039095306,0.1265114,0.0008320158,0.0005519751,0.0010664639,0.12478025,0.001228977,0.09851664,0.36756837,0.015766734,0.25893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012712682,0.0019637789,0.9474246,0.0026152884,0.00025181784,0.0014235484,0.021567367,0.00012900331,0.01238421,0.0026380273,0.007832555,0.0004985739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21512863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019525414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8209132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015156208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008195441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284880057","doi":"10.1017/s0007123422000266","title":"The Politics of Intersecting Crises: The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Climate Policy Preferences","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"University of California, Santa Barbara; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Climate change; Framing (construction); Pandemic; Public policy; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Politics; Government (linguistics); Complementarity (molecular biology); Public opinion; Political economy; Development economics; Economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Geography; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.29535337135436207,"score_gpt":0.48022172727738527,"score_spread":0.1848683559230232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284880057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745934,0.0001883689,0.000009073829,0.015557223,0.0003963251,0.0001839246,0.000045388188,0.000007845472,0.0090184305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975945,0.0008642942,0.000005448467,0.0012925749,0.00017590278,0.000005934009,2.8906064e-7,0.0000035685698,0.000057501093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961253,0.0017241237,0.0004349098,0.00010029875,0.0010762414,0.0005391636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995907,0.0029794879,0.0004139871,0.0002376021,0.00020713882,0.00025475532],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009007713,0.00006468719,0.00015257356,0.000079269135,0.004118497,0.00014859928,0.0019725165,0.00002741263,0.0001286612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01224009,0.00003713684,0.00014490588,0.00074564613,0.003542092,0.00012783553,0.00044628428,0.00045757127,9.858288e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010152585,0.00012978911,0.06144029,0.0000654125,0.00002053078,0.0000045274533,0.026766824,0.00008933463,0.0010894012,0.8778152,0.0008292985,0.031647895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025210942,0.0037532526,0.37327805,0.0009220152,0.00020452299,0.002162924,0.40670228,0.00039829992,0.001345978,0.112545684,0.09550248,0.0006634355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011720265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027901765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76526946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072138757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096227904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293086800","doi":"10.1017/s0007123422000023","title":"Political Understanding","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Politics; Ignorance; Democracy; Narrative; Political science; Citizen journalism; Public opinion; Epistemology; Participatory democracy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.07141111241041545,"score_gpt":0.3573488681750634,"score_spread":0.28593775576464797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293086800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30215105,0.00008309191,0.0033421258,0.019031478,0.0013829587,0.000120830264,0.000022899023,0.00003709795,0.6738285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969769,0.0000049667055,0.00022842812,0.0022449084,0.00024608136,2.618444e-7,1.9107517e-7,0.0000032191765,0.00029501968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643713,0.00017359358,0.00033353645,0.00008651515,0.0018232567,0.0011459696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981173,0.00015871382,0.00011035145,0.000059235623,0.00017894658,0.0013754043],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004406648,0.00004681904,0.000117375166,0.00017320314,0.0021357383,0.00040659172,0.00060207007,0.000021776303,0.0015728435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031016036,0.000053741278,0.00007260898,0.000709017,0.0014110504,0.0008963721,0.00011950421,0.00034108557,0.000009713117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032459961,0.000033345965,0.0000793867,0.0000012842636,0.000001556076,0.000055223554,0.0010640332,0.0000029076202,0.000037771424,0.9963733,0.0014377796,0.00091019284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010432346,0.0004403253,0.031037128,0.00008851083,0.000024708288,0.0055922563,0.32694206,0.00020893812,0.00019460838,0.5828058,0.051200807,0.00042162038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009672294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053490217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6948259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019928177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019013613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367298058","doi":"10.1017/s0007123423000054","title":"Freeing People; Restricting Capital","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Presumption; Capital (architecture); Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Economics; Movement (music); Human capital; Market economy; Political economy; Labour economics; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.04819308209312657,"score_gpt":0.35592723595740733,"score_spread":0.30773415386428077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367298058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9088631,0.0000758507,0.00011769425,0.015198868,0.0009132443,0.00005434688,0.0000077122895,0.00007041548,0.07469876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975965,0.00006702601,0.00026447017,0.0005240425,0.0013723971,7.0185354e-7,2.4907308e-7,0.0000066606976,0.0001679542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99608046,0.000177387,0.00041229278,0.00018124375,0.0015603717,0.0015882489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970828,0.0008593524,0.000109061395,0.00009066261,0.00050170464,0.0013563598],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058102356,0.00007279211,0.00018702318,0.00021531685,0.0014602318,0.00042708672,0.0007837646,0.00009704981,0.00007110382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019974813,0.0000815525,0.00011561406,0.0018078269,0.0023152456,0.00083278655,0.00013039196,0.0005906308,0.000084653584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018515033,0.000023850807,0.0015129586,0.0000056385106,0.0000027253107,0.00028855237,0.0015569415,0.00000481558,0.00017414345,0.9943637,0.0003054096,0.0017593588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022696055,0.00008536486,0.2487919,0.0001927805,0.000015664598,0.00046454597,0.008730522,0.000061836916,0.00015984206,0.7395959,0.0014687069,0.00020598315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008402485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008278591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25476786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031244502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001393307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381734902","doi":"10.1017/s0007123423000133","title":"A Drop in the Ocean: How Priors Anchor Attitudes Toward the American Carceral State","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of North Carolina at Greensboro; Vanderbilt University; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Subordination (linguistics); Prison; Socialization; White (mutation); Social psychology; State (computer science); Politics; Racial hierarchy; Psychology; Sociology; Race (biology); Gender studies; Criminology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05277758094611997,"score_gpt":0.38222455459283083,"score_spread":0.3294469736467109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381734902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9477486,0.00005034034,0.000027590286,0.051115233,0.0002001318,0.00014308542,0.0000064040755,0.000015420374,0.00069317425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836,0.00003160418,0.00002200839,0.00094788533,0.0004780504,0.0000032149098,2.0965159e-7,0.0000047875574,0.00015224093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643695,0.0005924566,0.0003148632,0.00015084748,0.0012801649,0.0012247282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852866,0.0005511484,0.00014821142,0.000103380786,0.00024878077,0.00041983218],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005446317,0.00007426764,0.0001923537,0.00009729371,0.0006012858,0.0007180867,0.00085296965,0.000022932009,0.000012272547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002729015,0.000048494014,0.00008681743,0.001887461,0.0029983574,0.0004237459,0.000051710034,0.00033649456,0.000013566043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003647841,0.00023568753,0.303251,0.000039873285,0.00002339682,0.00084465975,0.027605187,0.00005776341,0.0010081694,0.6351311,0.008655576,0.023111075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010877631,0.00012624158,0.9817332,0.000065645094,0.000006639477,0.00008767518,0.0050377147,0.00007753328,0.000031997257,0.010882473,0.0017530845,0.000089014466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037646238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00778983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67848223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026350692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006103219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386120544","doi":"10.1017/s0007123423000376","title":"Does Protest Influence Political Speech? Evidence from UK Climate Protest, 2017–2019","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"University of Edinburgh","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Affect (linguistics); Period (music); Work (physics); Political economy; Sociology; Law; Communication","score_opus":0.03840723225993982,"score_gpt":0.36767349282356887,"score_spread":0.32926626056362907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386120544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98126215,0.00014158853,0.00003104327,0.013306823,0.0017427697,0.00050003733,0.00014012416,0.00011576741,0.0027597183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943617,0.00031277118,0.0013392161,0.0009863738,0.002727273,0.000017740498,0.0000017794947,0.000018867682,0.00023428487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919245,0.0004463984,0.0008793889,0.0004854582,0.0027361093,0.003528126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99295455,0.0023738588,0.00031355218,0.00028216623,0.0012574027,0.0028184955],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039863028,0.0002169626,0.0004684405,0.00025838366,0.0014185772,0.00094631006,0.0017843182,0.00022069353,0.00023887146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0385571,0.00018223366,0.00020245484,0.0016804467,0.005776738,0.0015556029,0.0003135632,0.0007627174,0.00036323478],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004852277,0.00023177435,0.27673557,0.00007802116,0.00003137472,0.003180106,0.004496468,0.0000055470546,0.0076472242,0.695803,0.0032261307,0.008516303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005244906,0.00027288173,0.79957134,0.0022510914,0.00007624698,0.00044265014,0.010348667,0.000046816258,0.004977657,0.17738262,0.0034371223,0.000668444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0423705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014942937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52283573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006946979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031408549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386603356","doi":"10.1017/s0007123423000339","title":"Social Pressure in the International Human Rights Regime: Why States Withdraw Treaty Reservations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Colorado Boulder; Arizona State University; Concordia University; Harvard University","keywords":"Treaty; Reservation; Human rights; Political science; Work (physics); International community; Object (grammar); Law and economics; Law; International law; International human rights law; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.03759608299158239,"score_gpt":0.3656243464414452,"score_spread":0.3280282634498628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386603356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80931467,0.00002276385,0.000023506658,0.0915894,0.00051075616,0.000119390636,0.000019135932,0.000025593163,0.098374784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962698,0.000010828215,0.00007379656,0.0006636039,0.0006103173,0.000003428043,0.000004576023,0.0000027726478,0.002360835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973406,0.00013713949,0.000305767,0.00012844382,0.0015842078,0.0005038249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990178,0.00019708235,0.000103948565,0.000044268865,0.000504946,0.00013195109],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032679164,0.000054266475,0.00009485146,0.00019944842,0.0014283599,0.00055419427,0.0011831282,0.0000390844,0.00016440586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007074351,0.000045141842,0.000056887904,0.0008828926,0.0010297338,0.0007715116,0.00006869817,0.00022904886,0.000014673678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003871894,0.000047985744,0.0026790395,0.0000013056014,0.0000074506256,0.000111497386,0.002639666,0.0000047587623,0.00006725098,0.9599781,0.034289807,0.00016924267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034186686,0.000031458065,0.4870186,0.00009124205,0.0000087970375,0.00007396504,0.0029053404,0.00007445869,0.00007509752,0.3782063,0.13105758,0.00011530618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008432975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075654103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5817718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000174276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003366156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387459434","doi":"10.1017/s0007123423000492","title":"Neither a Trait nor Wildly Fluctuating: On the Stability of Populist Attitudes and its Implications for Empirical Research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Trait; Stability (learning theory); Variable (mathematics); Empirical research; Panel survey; Social psychology; Panel data; Positive economics; Psychology; Economics; Econometrics; Demographic economics; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.2516642829491886,"score_gpt":0.4943962343580522,"score_spread":0.2427319514088636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387459434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96861964,0.000036470916,0.000036646103,0.029033905,0.00010064042,0.00032268735,0.000086371554,0.000013577266,0.0017500629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989973,0.000018139104,0.000245635,0.000416832,0.00019833205,0.000013684265,4.885939e-7,0.0000066910197,0.00010293003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968349,0.000348438,0.0004239543,0.00024705575,0.0012277941,0.0009179118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964401,0.0019070193,0.00012382871,0.00014118789,0.0008934212,0.0004944426],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010291899,0.00006864567,0.00017877865,0.0001331362,0.0015322448,0.00026263765,0.0008441645,0.000054171465,0.00004914876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016158512,0.000053622756,0.00008105027,0.0011520337,0.0026021146,0.00032347438,0.00011540518,0.000291088,0.000004046164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023374772,0.00026303905,0.038572628,0.00003060692,0.000013518189,0.00000747542,0.00263624,0.0000015396847,0.005981476,0.94529563,0.0024441883,0.0047302595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018814931,0.00016684008,0.93138546,0.00010965032,0.0000066114803,0.000015966654,0.0014663669,0.000039012237,0.00048470747,0.06523521,0.0008316359,0.00007039483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018616843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011581181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89281285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025706374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008432493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387610122","doi":"10.1017/s0007123423000364","title":"When Do Citizens Consider Political Parties Legitimate?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Göteborgs Universitet; Universität Wien; University of Cambridge; Universität Trier","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.06709679439967577,"score_gpt":0.37930159619604636,"score_spread":0.3122048017963706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387610122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91995656,0.00011865205,0.0001433818,0.024729839,0.001081734,0.00019210995,0.000031790685,0.0001226134,0.053623345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697286,0.000010366156,0.00018445318,0.00087375287,0.0011348457,0.0000057345037,8.452567e-7,0.000012080684,0.00080504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446285,0.00035398497,0.0007042282,0.00024909526,0.0015966775,0.0026331474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99605113,0.0006763915,0.00014026751,0.00013527731,0.00083888805,0.002158048],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039907275,0.00012250396,0.0003315022,0.00021105667,0.00095860194,0.00080697413,0.0005260308,0.00011478957,0.0004811075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070211207,0.00012560772,0.00015193509,0.0008565485,0.003691348,0.00077994214,0.0000913335,0.0003280244,0.00024891685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045542197,0.00003747799,0.004149164,0.000011009875,0.0000066694765,0.00016541294,0.00045084962,0.000001952064,0.00027148536,0.98806345,0.0061469013,0.0006910734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005756663,0.00024147159,0.12926927,0.00041067897,0.000049480666,0.0007630696,0.0051953453,0.000106138206,0.0012384709,0.8455179,0.016182143,0.00045037986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012802377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010042312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14254557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004604909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013398235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99902004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387610144","doi":"10.1017/s0007123423000315","title":"Crossing the Line: Evidence for the Categorization Theory of Spatial Voting","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Stony Brook University; Simon Fraser University; Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich; University of Southampton; University of Dayton","keywords":"Ideology; Voting; Salience (neuroscience); Categorization; Social psychology; Social identity theory; Norm (philosophy); Identity (music); Econometrics; Psychology; Positive economics; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Cognitive psychology; Social group; Artificial intelligence; Politics; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.12813373076818074,"score_gpt":0.42828018646238053,"score_spread":0.3001464556941998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387610144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9158328,0.00048735962,0.06535796,0.016021973,0.001324226,0.0004375256,0.000010261253,0.000027262171,0.0005005979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998586,0.000013556005,0.000053272473,0.00015234794,0.0010449463,0.0000050397935,1.8579806e-7,0.0000043036594,0.00014035577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977232,0.0002952188,0.00043484117,0.00010297748,0.0007754639,0.0006682565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948727,0.0038846994,0.00021810045,0.00007525508,0.00073598814,0.00021327178],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010374842,0.000048918766,0.00012107143,0.000046491874,0.0018540092,0.00047631568,0.0005365476,0.00003945227,0.000020828918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021709045,0.00003189225,0.00008994561,0.00072812196,0.0025531242,0.0004255462,0.00004273625,0.00014375328,0.0000037246605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012408824,0.000013435286,0.0025863328,0.000014617319,0.0000046540135,0.0000028680226,0.0009929138,0.00011612074,0.0014021202,0.97757727,0.00010101341,0.017176263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046268103,0.0003724216,0.73875344,0.0010413274,0.00012409511,0.000100352314,0.005243643,0.01077288,0.0053382874,0.23569249,0.0018360374,0.00026231672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016083913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001930817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74188477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012376755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091291114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407419334","doi":"10.1017/s0007123424000929","title":"Do Political Leaders Understand Public Opinion Better than Backbenchers?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Vlaamse regering; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Universität Konstanz; University of Toronto; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Public opinion; Politics; Political science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.09741596568846485,"score_gpt":0.39649818993284575,"score_spread":0.2990822242443809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407419334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7180935,0.00059139816,0.004172041,0.12360072,0.0025889396,0.00029835207,0.000015582396,0.000055354492,0.15058409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997023,0.000012777641,0.00021264088,0.0016543396,0.000786262,0.0000019717827,5.661491e-7,0.0000066014995,0.0003018365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953816,0.0003946966,0.00061754143,0.00027172585,0.0012241922,0.0021102603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703014,0.00041723307,0.000118077,0.00014051529,0.0006909857,0.0016030715],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032186913,0.000120833094,0.00028253527,0.00024741713,0.0010178504,0.0009054358,0.0006657783,0.0001496693,0.00022961003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004060516,0.00012384368,0.00015298875,0.0010720453,0.0039955545,0.001011806,0.00007090152,0.0004168603,0.000023900846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004747642,0.00007197127,0.010245454,0.0000149747975,0.000010037692,0.00001779666,0.00022654704,3.500009e-7,0.00011849912,0.9862294,0.0011992538,0.001860968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012920212,0.00036940508,0.27537712,0.0010980861,0.00006598741,0.0002721962,0.022327691,0.000075271455,0.0006934364,0.66247016,0.035319485,0.0006391176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010317757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018362042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32375923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011669289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017855477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407421343","doi":"10.1017/s0007123424000413","title":"The Spillover of the US Capitol Insurrection: Reducing Expressed Support for Domestic Far-Right Parties","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Southampton; Newcastle University; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Spillover effect; Far right; Political science; Business; International trade; Law; Economics; Politics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02184136230356709,"score_gpt":0.3501989710229674,"score_spread":0.3283576087194003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407421343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97918975,0.00030364565,0.00048039577,0.0076780375,0.0026708175,0.000312649,0.000013541062,0.000009693771,0.00934144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795836,0.0000170356,0.00004995347,0.00023598611,0.00035531132,0.000009329618,9.2199855e-8,0.0000030510444,0.0013708762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770766,0.00021553958,0.0005386031,0.00012686393,0.0006781147,0.0007332219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980035,0.00070956856,0.00020214933,0.00012451217,0.0007003541,0.00025990495],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027215267,0.00006455963,0.00017520152,0.00004578561,0.0014331049,0.0002723183,0.0005675995,0.00005376858,0.000035520803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059120124,0.00004277943,0.0001354532,0.0005437956,0.002212063,0.00030008238,0.000048464524,0.00016642721,0.0000014538331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016740487,0.000060096798,0.004877904,0.000027129288,0.0000122498,0.0000040264763,0.0003561692,0.000022556951,0.0024421238,0.9866044,0.0021556371,0.0034209804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010169649,0.0004136652,0.6097914,0.001100393,0.00015074304,0.00018598203,0.001871102,0.00030749704,0.02757431,0.22830294,0.12893957,0.0003454416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009857737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019708225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75830144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024410897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00137907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408769471","doi":"10.1017/s0007123424000784","title":"International Border Restrictions During COVID-19 as Global Health Security Theatre","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Global health; Health security; Pandemic; Political science; International trade; Virology; Business; Medicine; Public health; Health care; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Law; Outbreak","score_opus":0.016820952296355073,"score_gpt":0.42262302865314255,"score_spread":0.4058020763567875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408769471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3142074,0.0006868368,0.00070736615,0.30013272,0.0024943189,0.00020482503,0.0001077177,0.000061327075,0.3813975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98937356,0.00066630164,0.00020571522,0.009088864,0.00045575263,0.0000013791775,8.425224e-7,0.0000018779168,0.000205698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966087,0.00033927252,0.00050591666,0.0002355164,0.0012131497,0.0010974758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968392,0.00015857493,0.00016488304,0.00009947454,0.000489292,0.002248526],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038990139,0.00007931678,0.0001915874,0.00015290098,0.0023124486,0.0005703543,0.00096484105,0.000083757,0.00046510843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065620774,0.00009001285,0.000101621816,0.0016124226,0.001408948,0.00073044456,0.00013350118,0.00037648343,0.000010570567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010945714,0.00013113601,0.004471266,0.000014767281,0.000008320794,0.000074783566,0.0006007896,0.000004891983,0.0000020282002,0.9830354,0.0045318827,0.007113811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000677055,0.00008501389,0.14615709,0.00017151088,0.000008783371,0.0009996194,0.006984414,0.000019719035,0.000004510078,0.26752463,0.5772229,0.00014478866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14457054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011478798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7155107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036929187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016068725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409083318","doi":"10.1017/s0007123424000693","title":"When Reelection Increases Party Unity: Evidence from Parties in Mexico","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.043729665676710563,"score_gpt":0.3586450740271418,"score_spread":0.31491540835043125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409083318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98427874,0.0009469664,0.00022370649,0.0056561963,0.00056972343,0.00008725961,0.000008955279,0.00001563128,0.008212796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969901,0.00038020423,0.00044604245,0.0015979816,0.00033961315,0.000003187823,3.2272777e-7,0.0000027445665,0.00023980482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970149,0.00042337112,0.000520126,0.0001908616,0.00091815414,0.00093260914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737936,0.0012568184,0.0001301993,0.000121341785,0.00049964356,0.0006126311],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037777163,0.00008087285,0.0002304355,0.00022878397,0.0005194142,0.0003891387,0.0007042255,0.00008609305,0.00018472598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022626286,0.00008694713,0.00006569242,0.00091825036,0.0022532823,0.0013594485,0.000078892175,0.0003827542,0.000011033774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003908674,0.00021865565,0.32440975,0.000020456648,0.000013288923,0.00026889134,0.0035873442,0.000014662015,0.0009052088,0.65264237,0.003714922,0.014165351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034502635,0.000100225465,0.5988117,0.0021564548,0.0000367337,0.00006248571,0.0060593016,0.00006737191,0.0031859241,0.3803925,0.008572764,0.00020953386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13544317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022239335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2744019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053585763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029518674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99560225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410403404","doi":"10.1017/s0007123424000930","title":"Inflation, Blame Attribution, and the 2022 US Congressional Elections","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Blame; Inflation (cosmology); Attribution; Political science; Keynesian economics; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.015966587378335954,"score_gpt":0.35184770490028106,"score_spread":0.3358811175219451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410403404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95067173,0.00054484623,0.001799327,0.034763858,0.00074674835,0.00017614353,0.00000729432,0.000013831621,0.011276245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980312,0.000029339686,0.00004537163,0.000734012,0.00031068933,0.0000038649396,2.9001282e-7,0.0000015390576,0.000843712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805576,0.0003257886,0.00037348332,0.00010769694,0.00059531716,0.00054194964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816424,0.0005033787,0.00010527251,0.00005509655,0.0008198508,0.00035214436],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035390002,0.00004827601,0.00013997815,0.00008275884,0.0015390038,0.00033775528,0.00023570619,0.00004944665,0.00010450584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00483674,0.000038019116,0.000052930744,0.00077194284,0.003353157,0.00039308902,0.000041072406,0.00022572295,0.000003871626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009411647,0.000017965835,0.01600546,0.0000025011345,0.00000474298,0.0000031692853,0.00008479339,0.0000022695976,0.00014747487,0.9816441,0.0010086567,0.0010694345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006579494,0.000034879766,0.76201254,0.00014249161,0.000029210647,0.000111976806,0.00026488406,0.00012561171,0.00017377248,0.21782625,0.0185425,0.00007792778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009852087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022293266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76381785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002270667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010265645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412994104","doi":"10.1017/s0007123425000390","title":"Voter Sexism and Electoral Penalties for Women Candidates: Evidence from Four Democracies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Reading; University of Oxford; University College London; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Political science; Demographic economics; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.038944165312571895,"score_gpt":0.36030086117939475,"score_spread":0.32135669586682286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412994104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98758,0.0006333449,0.0018033021,0.007615,0.0004358168,0.00012555406,0.000018530625,0.000008282547,0.0017801946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99654055,0.00013631233,0.0010460182,0.00047631044,0.00030254302,0.000005367255,2.4805473e-7,0.0000030696795,0.001489582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980978,0.000102287246,0.00029033862,0.00018378957,0.00052089343,0.0008049045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983067,0.0005943032,0.00009432025,0.00006455968,0.00046868876,0.00047144928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016984856,0.00006680028,0.00016933399,0.00011611854,0.0007602356,0.00062476576,0.00037001737,0.000049942035,0.000035486024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033997756,0.00006574077,0.000051219067,0.0002660573,0.0014001201,0.0006670048,0.00006916996,0.00013316998,0.0000011800485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011527076,0.00016030953,0.123582914,0.00013436965,0.000099298864,0.0001399517,0.018082205,0.000012372888,0.008971001,0.8067076,0.0055860537,0.03640865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004523379,0.00012337875,0.48024598,0.00041334954,0.000031305273,0.00008415753,0.011016577,0.00021170385,0.0016973744,0.5031787,0.0023672099,0.00017789415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013892783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018616659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35666308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032144392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012002116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416161625","doi":"10.1017/s0007123425100987","title":"Leveling and Spotlighting: How the European Court of Justice Favors the Weak to Promote Its Legitimacy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Leverage (statistics); Odds; European court of justice; Economic Justice; European Union law; Private rights","score_opus":0.04800517972276541,"score_gpt":0.3566066833202704,"score_spread":0.308601503597505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416161625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6928575,0.0008339907,0.0014760746,0.10807081,0.0005590879,0.0002061437,0.000009395013,0.000008141857,0.19597888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99775887,0.00007824131,0.00018882198,0.00066891825,0.00028367742,7.884068e-7,2.5674355e-8,0.0000021143412,0.0010185741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984441,0.00022329246,0.00023191799,0.00011555705,0.00063211564,0.00035302143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984277,0.00041658632,0.00010753429,0.000055493925,0.00083253515,0.00016017152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038157175,0.00005433862,0.0001241989,0.000053065345,0.0012042942,0.00037542876,0.0006875618,0.000010333361,0.000009169091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004949653,0.000035565925,0.000046901197,0.00042445792,0.0014747661,0.00028499644,0.00018605191,0.00016892154,0.0000024262727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004252405,0.000024787514,0.00025394757,0.0000070521355,0.000012622196,0.00001193522,0.001600415,0.0000065405243,0.00075258734,0.98790014,0.0021704365,0.00725526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005672229,0.00024760963,0.5417272,0.0015648867,0.00018388958,0.00033825432,0.043295547,0.00041940066,0.0033062077,0.027687706,0.38033944,0.00032262053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006415332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035555448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96021247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007449874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031567243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92625785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116707465","doi":"10.1017/s0007123425101099","title":"A Two-Path Theory of Context Effects: Pseudoenvironments and Social Cohesion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Social Power and Status Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Northwestern University; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; University of Minnesota; Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University; American Political Science Association; Sage Foundation","keywords":"Cohesion (chemistry); Perception; Homogeneous; Diversity (politics); Social environment; Context (archaeology); Social reality","score_opus":0.0072488398275224394,"score_gpt":0.3036758869072711,"score_spread":0.29642704707974865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116707465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807069,0.0005587045,0.001554088,0.0008711058,0.00045102614,0.00011573657,0.000010236998,0.000007221716,0.01572501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99882144,0.00008686049,0.00027210676,0.00055323465,0.00010287809,7.845062e-7,1.31038e-7,0.0000029788969,0.00015957336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998112,0.00029565487,0.00030185774,0.00013206252,0.00063797773,0.0005204386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892414,0.00049472717,0.00012826745,0.000043561227,0.00016561567,0.00024367619],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026099947,0.0000633388,0.00022701468,0.00008581772,0.0006981639,0.000119239914,0.0003377246,0.00006013558,0.000019975292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017485894,0.000067198416,0.00007966971,0.000305306,0.0037679675,0.00028480118,0.00008436218,0.00018832125,9.875148e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020134858,0.000082408726,0.0065870197,0.000017420325,0.0000099265535,0.000029509743,0.0019677724,1.7319039e-7,0.00042871147,0.94250005,0.000084187115,0.04827266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014670342,0.00017826619,0.63558024,0.00039839963,0.00008088821,0.0000609715,0.022773251,0.00004505088,0.0002850184,0.33823413,0.0007030055,0.0001937777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014989191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013780223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6289932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022447854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053564145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117305961","doi":"10.1017/s000712342510121x","title":"Reducing Gender Gaps in Political Participation with Efficacy Promotion: Evidence from a Civic Education Experiment in Zambia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Princeton University; University of Denver; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; University of Notre Dame; Harvard University","keywords":"Gender gap; Politics; Civic engagement; Information gap; Field (mathematics); Political efficacy","score_opus":0.06299295499729206,"score_gpt":0.41561947152894696,"score_spread":0.3526265165316549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117305961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862301,0.00038236068,0.00044790158,0.0051440727,0.00039912187,0.0002320054,0.0000014548185,0.000008051207,0.0071549495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984939,0.000032014017,0.0009082603,0.00022208855,0.00023756937,0.000014196494,7.9827527e-7,0.0000044015796,0.0000867488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970199,0.00033396672,0.0005522732,0.00029805698,0.00086016685,0.0009356733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858534,0.00028986507,0.000117070806,0.00012182582,0.00038265373,0.0005032204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017944676,0.000086899374,0.00018877462,0.00031645113,0.00026513264,0.00033812944,0.0003452208,0.000067792724,0.00006565003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024527102,0.000089284455,0.000043731638,0.0010139922,0.0008180018,0.00076040503,0.00005108659,0.00026355783,0.0000029564703],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004929516,0.0017088216,0.093290746,0.00003809944,0.000012017478,0.000118624586,0.012860452,0.000159537,0.0040673176,0.87602586,0.00013277485,0.011536456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047619475,0.00007575878,0.9520591,0.0013289877,0.000016314849,0.000036075122,0.009987988,0.00016234307,0.0027953207,0.032901783,0.000037644415,0.0001224867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042430684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031825951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85876834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011726009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037890854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96394587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}