{"meta":{"query_hash":"230c109e8786","filters":{"venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology"},"cohort_total":112,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":112,"exported":112,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/230c109e8786","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=British+Journal+of+Social+Psychology"},"results":[{"id":"W1543531153","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02066.x","title":"The effects of third‐party validation and minimization on judgments of the transgressor and the third party","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Forgiveness; Third party; Psychology; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Marine transgression; Interpersonal relationship; Internet privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.02170307519233988,"score_gpt":0.3003767800417694,"score_spread":0.2786737048494295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543531153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968104,0.00007445329,0.00015804176,0.00007321376,0.000007655702,0.000014807785,0.0000059476824,0.000004128315,0.0028514597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924195,0.000044871595,0.00029097582,0.000038784678,0.0000051166853,0.000019297873,0.0000133487865,0.000006396736,0.0003392625],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99064004,0.0070138574,0.0003230919,0.00042531564,0.0011967166,0.00040096493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8870406,0.08598211,0.01617232,0.0050976938,0.0026311069,0.0030762164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009854865,0.0004586107,0.00041676196,0.00055946794,0.0010103736,0.0018419877,0.00040529785,0.00073775684,0.0030520642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072815046,0.00035095177,0.00044307843,0.00020472992,0.0023796367,0.0010897196,0.0016321354,0.0019236561,0.0002092064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.039682195,0.009903569,0.58107704,0.0007895572,0.0017953588,0.0009681559,0.07121281,0.002037136,0.08944877,0.008897734,0.0015451905,0.19264254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000272384,0.0037816754,0.9695143,0.0001563907,0.00026926378,0.0005041339,0.011203392,0.001711281,0.008401344,0.0026047963,0.0014425488,0.00013857431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011571859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019276757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009854865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063433585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058094074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052118123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564384134","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12121","title":"Unfreezing cognitions during an intractable conflict: Does an external incentive for negotiating peace and (low levels of) collective angst increase information seeking?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological and Educational Research Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Negotiation; Psychology; Social psychology; Incentive; Conflict resolution; Cognition; Political science","score_opus":0.08189680887116195,"score_gpt":0.4079265587718267,"score_spread":0.32602974990066474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564384134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99900454,0.000024286735,0.00007702859,0.00006063013,0.000002428466,0.0000029523458,0.0000028309048,0.0000016196105,0.00082379003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99962234,0.00002300936,0.00013884043,0.000042748805,0.000004074498,0.0000051423735,0.00000893715,0.000001269608,0.00015366141],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994887,0.00020669927,0.00001980019,0.00006074676,0.00013814913,0.00008589941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995291,0.0018661259,0.0016067638,0.000380256,0.00011804028,0.00073790236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013078201,0.00023235759,0.0002749738,0.0004466944,0.00050635496,0.0015613999,0.00023026574,0.0007362994,0.0016855603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068155546,0.00027095331,0.00015423876,0.00022216605,0.0012499159,0.000726211,0.00072594325,0.0015249918,0.00013362244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004180569,0.0076466184,0.7748392,0.00027857584,0.00027556415,0.00094447227,0.056319427,0.0007972769,0.08228288,0.005448966,0.00076992484,0.06621643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071134345,0.0009842615,0.9876622,0.000025023119,0.00003512347,0.00023100979,0.0053505288,0.00093141804,0.0014199442,0.002639535,0.000618587,0.00003127648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011360802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020000832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016855603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003373713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002951214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0069164634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566143469","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02032.x","title":"Testing the social identity relative deprivation (SIRD) model of social change: The political rise of Scottish nationalism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Relative deprivation; Nationalism; Psychology; Feeling; Social psychology; Identity (music); Politics; Social deprivation; Social identity theory; Structural equation modeling; Group identification; Social group; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.17307000494830668,"score_gpt":0.3939023909887717,"score_spread":0.22083238604046504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566143469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979182,0.000025175817,0.00046195235,0.00026669604,0.00000839336,0.000019513694,0.00006761453,0.000004213674,0.0012281785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993806,0.00001511878,0.0002857709,0.000026766531,0.0000059123445,0.000016247453,0.00007830309,0.0000010698875,0.00019008745],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965593,0.0022078995,0.00012098036,0.000412228,0.00035043104,0.00034919017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835189,0.010449882,0.002599614,0.0013076019,0.00093108707,0.0011928325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062451498,0.0006873849,0.00053581555,0.0008079292,0.0011071988,0.0015358353,0.0012391938,0.00074541,0.0042723683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01681099,0.00031728638,0.001428658,0.0007815813,0.0015087955,0.0009868917,0.002133906,0.0012867275,0.00036435292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054679555,0.0009995482,0.9752377,0.000043024305,0.0003976433,0.00025444728,0.0029277308,0.003170735,0.00049508514,0.004925214,0.00051466475,0.010487387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013247412,0.0010403144,0.9240057,0.000034068013,0.00030917782,0.0001229658,0.0031700549,0.06489275,0.00041619304,0.004399473,0.0014342915,0.00004265553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06610747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036953628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06610747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022384196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019636343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13144535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595625467","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12119","title":"An interactive activation and competition model of person knowledge, suggested by proactive interference by traits spontaneously inferred from behaviours","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Trait; Big Five personality traits; Personality; Social psychology; Competition (biology); Perception; Cognitive psychology; Categorical variable; Ecology; Computer science","score_opus":0.057127103880272694,"score_gpt":0.3717129819150437,"score_spread":0.314585878034771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595625467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5690983,0.0008452108,0.33636674,0.0031338392,0.00013119896,0.0006923131,0.00039571323,0.0007714507,0.08856525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97440255,0.00014245835,0.022670167,0.000317581,0.000046778514,0.0003160371,0.00015405005,0.000064541666,0.0018858378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973003,0.00066029787,0.000116384224,0.00088278955,0.00077917194,0.00026099492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933529,0.0039690253,0.0010372613,0.00083566364,0.00038530442,0.00041983675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027370646,0.00084894506,0.00073092285,0.0013979452,0.00069174456,0.0020675017,0.0021291068,0.0012993539,0.006632251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009834916,0.0007600141,0.0013325257,0.00093089417,0.0029105672,0.0046337806,0.002128589,0.0013195253,0.00074152387],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003882524,0.0017919664,0.1741613,0.0015898617,0.0012685627,0.0031188896,0.02708697,0.023331184,0.17326476,0.42234734,0.0034306834,0.16472596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004958871,0.0023482784,0.2764667,0.00015550554,0.0006442686,0.0055062426,0.0022197429,0.20006312,0.016704483,0.4890904,0.0059421533,0.00036324674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025055015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019172262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006632251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012727246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086567993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022187054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1610837822","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12118","title":"Finding death in meaninglessness: Evidence that death‐thought accessibility increases in response to meaning threats","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Psychology; Social psychology; Compensation (psychology); Epistemology; Psychotherapist; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1757928749597709,"score_gpt":0.4393048104198002,"score_spread":0.26351193546002927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1610837822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99814117,0.00013362628,0.0002081227,0.00014013478,0.0000134700595,0.000016836226,0.000029594323,0.000007890543,0.00130915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926966,0.00009490081,0.00015367313,0.00011514701,0.00001641672,0.000029503974,0.00005080881,0.0000061228784,0.0002637152],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998946,0.00038475878,0.00007289649,0.00017722254,0.0003046001,0.000114518014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778495,0.011760654,0.006003364,0.0023838729,0.00068669487,0.0013158451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002064906,0.0003217769,0.00035433602,0.0007334205,0.000708604,0.0010402288,0.00055344973,0.0009256966,0.0053253737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0257998,0.0003954072,0.00033704308,0.000316183,0.0017827454,0.0010005683,0.0017472102,0.0016753107,0.00041674866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0053748875,0.004380457,0.82368475,0.0010642353,0.00052457565,0.0012751535,0.04903725,0.0003005033,0.044894565,0.001300925,0.0019268028,0.066235945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031258314,0.00047523415,0.9939009,0.000025956839,0.000029467197,0.0003613374,0.0032394233,0.00009157474,0.0006192854,0.00069161755,0.0005177225,0.000016238822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078127935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006864363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053253737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022058512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023140715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017815173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1816408537","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02035.x","title":"Unpacking the hedonic paradox: A dynamic analysis of the relationships between financial capital, social capital and life satisfaction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Happiness; Social capital; Life satisfaction; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Economics; Perspective (graphical); Priming (agriculture); Positive economics; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.054691489474852924,"score_gpt":0.3254880064679856,"score_spread":0.2707965169931327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1816408537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9381773,0.0025792257,0.018917255,0.009829879,0.00008812652,0.00003044842,0.00024175686,0.000032947028,0.030103168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981536,0.0002534239,0.00097364996,0.00016350983,0.000034402023,0.000010249114,0.000029143677,0.0000060430343,0.0003758661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962044,0.00020459514,0.0000117813415,0.00006639845,0.000053570966,0.000043150783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664825,0.0024869686,0.00030959235,0.00017917062,0.00014655995,0.00022933345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014403332,0.0003212705,0.00042065923,0.0012931925,0.00051977974,0.0022929225,0.0005252878,0.0005936295,0.0051903725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005918504,0.00024809854,0.00037103615,0.0012279213,0.002349621,0.0044735735,0.00184667,0.0012612604,0.00018132177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065904483,0.00047484454,0.18860519,0.00033587558,0.00038760706,0.0007063429,0.009270077,0.0085689565,0.0053722975,0.6808945,0.0024523912,0.102272965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041982064,0.00018516854,0.29819816,0.00007642166,0.000104914274,0.00029799948,0.003822711,0.025790881,0.00042754167,0.66696745,0.0040229624,0.00006372288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014945961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013221061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051903725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007173564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000538809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017363548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1847380670","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02014.x","title":"`Where the rubber hits the road’ en route to inter‐group harmony: Examining contact intentions and contact behaviour under meta‐stereotype threat","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Prejudice (legal term); Social psychology; Stereotype (UML); Stereotype threat; Ingroups and outgroups; Psychological intervention","score_opus":0.1251704605641402,"score_gpt":0.3726044854614676,"score_spread":0.24743402489732744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1847380670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99892634,0.000010280257,0.000111304646,0.000029213508,0.0000021978021,0.00000642574,0.000005316209,0.0000015921121,0.00090736407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986123,0.000026755599,0.0003286768,0.000042341762,0.0000020552009,0.000024942194,0.000018637173,0.0000028667976,0.00094134227],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993838,0.00032937777,0.000021429985,0.00007065313,0.00012318903,0.00007156154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976539,0.00081953657,0.0008381396,0.00027139165,0.0001594094,0.00025778692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001316749,0.00020075747,0.00020853365,0.00026213532,0.00086781883,0.0010903275,0.00023377557,0.00051475246,0.0027058239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040067295,0.0001820945,0.00025615023,0.00014023573,0.0006276078,0.0005386421,0.00060450134,0.001114339,0.0003622031],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028068912,0.006748065,0.62615114,0.00037688433,0.00021768243,0.0005389588,0.20588534,0.00044157697,0.084510505,0.0023684695,0.0013030204,0.06865139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023219667,0.0019419622,0.94344914,0.00006288544,0.000048212674,0.00016619347,0.0472615,0.0007953761,0.004056226,0.0008532814,0.0013122291,0.000029762285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002483564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048045674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027058239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002923208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029448312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009051859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1910650044","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02071.x","title":"Negative expectancies for the group's outcomes undermine normative collective action: Conflict between Christian and Muslim groups in Lebanon","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Normative; Injustice; Social psychology; Action (physics); Group identification; Ingroups and outgroups; Collective action; Social identity theory; Path analysis (statistics); Identification (biology); Just-world hypothesis; Group conflict; Normative social influence; Group (periodic table); Social group","score_opus":0.12759863733823384,"score_gpt":0.39278314221038146,"score_spread":0.2651845048721476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1910650044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997453,0.000015330153,0.0000062991076,0.000044787845,0.0000012705382,7.642304e-7,0.0000019900383,1.3108499e-7,0.00018403248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998097,0.000011264216,0.000010761755,0.000019800222,0.0000015421787,0.0000014854173,0.000005516806,1.8248926e-7,0.00013964962],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995192,0.00023942985,0.000014580486,0.000040048744,0.00005888772,0.00012789262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989066,0.0002968037,0.00032221852,0.00003780488,0.00008293903,0.00035349588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012636894,0.00024922634,0.00023503923,0.00064758555,0.0022270975,0.0013889498,0.0003767126,0.00053149596,0.001789752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014976555,0.0001544635,0.00015728142,0.00041800874,0.0017327286,0.0005103155,0.0011922596,0.00080888363,0.00012419019],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041601164,0.00055487984,0.8952951,0.000031645795,0.000045826157,0.00056243443,0.09118054,0.00012511549,0.0014685027,0.0010379542,0.00032658578,0.008955421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022840431,0.0002554561,0.84009606,0.000020240634,0.000014624094,0.00014516636,0.15729943,0.0005188782,0.00023285422,0.00069792045,0.0006813436,0.000015286332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022498181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045408223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022498181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017306053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007455344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044734478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1955788977","doi":"10.1348/014466610x519683","title":"Facing social identity change: Interactive effects of current and projected collective identification on expectations regarding future self‐esteem and psychological well‐being","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Valence (chemistry); Social identity theory; Salient; Social psychology; Young adult; Self-esteem; Identification (biology); Developmental psychology; Identity (music); Ingroups and outgroups; Social group","score_opus":0.03858636700568184,"score_gpt":0.41020370269197365,"score_spread":0.3716173356862918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1955788977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993925,0.000015132605,0.000039564537,0.000022111935,0.000002839655,0.0000034057928,0.0000057551597,0.0000013148608,0.000517389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996283,0.000019220352,0.00011165704,0.000015021451,0.0000027552383,0.000008950329,0.000014132706,0.0000012673546,0.00019869383],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935156,0.0003148411,0.00002816516,0.000101136866,0.000111559086,0.000092849215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99505734,0.003194471,0.000674938,0.0002105596,0.00014678093,0.00071593816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012999938,0.00024435393,0.00025765022,0.00021842963,0.000431068,0.0013876356,0.00021320222,0.0005637116,0.0029525568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062139616,0.00021359244,0.00027667655,0.00010745424,0.0006233004,0.0006335724,0.0009732094,0.0009516249,0.00014876101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009115914,0.0060188454,0.8445655,0.00028195465,0.0004814091,0.0009924582,0.021299023,0.0018501384,0.074373335,0.001760107,0.00041752378,0.03884369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003680766,0.0011558024,0.9913327,0.00001391535,0.00007921906,0.00010271232,0.003661369,0.00074805523,0.0021651,0.00044782276,0.00023768972,0.000018813593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006946053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016556738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029525568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002764279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025059067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0098772645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964520967","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12016","title":"Explaining dehumanization among children: The interspecies model of prejudice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":171,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dehumanization; Prejudice (legal term); Psychology; Social psychology; Outgroup; Social dominance orientation; Empathy; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04233264188457887,"score_gpt":0.351670697393817,"score_spread":0.30933805550923815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964520967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9381498,0.0025737605,0.02851702,0.0037480688,0.000052558516,0.00006078079,0.00011352596,0.00003693974,0.02674766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99409497,0.00086138456,0.0040516984,0.00019283587,0.000019298368,0.000036501297,0.00004646622,0.000006274962,0.00069051184],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993949,0.0003014634,0.00001582355,0.00011310249,0.000103116115,0.00007151881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985487,0.00066119566,0.0004365338,0.00015819361,0.00009011667,0.00010533968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013270911,0.0006652111,0.00028960145,0.0008075606,0.0005394362,0.0011937909,0.0005477003,0.000669412,0.003026898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003182709,0.00023630542,0.00045231584,0.00038827906,0.0015965011,0.0012050851,0.0013632313,0.0015562937,0.00020048449],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012390311,0.0004562135,0.7949593,0.00025231316,0.00032264975,0.00065551716,0.012022737,0.004863334,0.0024457609,0.10783359,0.0010178641,0.075046815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047153844,0.00034268806,0.74906206,0.00038916172,0.00021954282,0.0010171733,0.008664132,0.023118485,0.0014423003,0.20729706,0.0083319,0.00006834793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00523409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00841433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00523409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073806656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007124596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010407269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965056477","doi":"10.1348/014466603763276171","title":"Happy mood decreases self‐focused attention","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mood; Psychology; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.05432302538751395,"score_gpt":0.41108383234474716,"score_spread":0.3567608069572332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965056477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993356,0.0010274517,0.0008463541,0.00017414312,0.000111371264,0.000019073575,0.00007597157,0.00006134648,0.004328352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945321,0.0009916868,0.001234166,0.0002732206,0.0000650601,0.000073383395,0.00013395313,0.000040717536,0.0026555296],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977106,0.000060826245,0.000016190805,0.000039119044,0.00006766169,0.000045066987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942136,0.00022565947,0.00015765458,0.00005256624,0.000054779535,0.0000880051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029227234,0.00025456116,0.0003147421,0.00017562881,0.00020593553,0.00042857413,0.0001517509,0.00030172584,0.0051898435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001897368,0.00021891877,0.00020708703,0.000055878798,0.00017946225,0.00016417325,0.0005566982,0.00039825673,0.00042614026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007645986,0.0010776698,0.0089497985,0.0007304773,0.0002551663,0.00025068858,0.0008405109,0.00013068813,0.91454566,0.00075123255,0.0026753661,0.062146813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009848071,0.0154960565,0.74522996,0.00017955371,0.0006626985,0.0011254614,0.00083731447,0.0016419028,0.21777858,0.0027958995,0.013197734,0.00007002736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002875663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033888285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051898435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012980412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107062406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01736176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973103433","doi":"10.1348/0144666041501660","title":"Procrastination and counterfactual thinking: Avoiding what might have been","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual conditional; Counterfactual thinking; Procrastination; Psychology; Anxiety; Social psychology; Mood; Trait; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.024448006606259547,"score_gpt":0.3348941652023441,"score_spread":0.31044615859608454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973103433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987419,0.00007722632,0.00048609677,0.000033996876,0.0000029502075,0.000006515627,0.000004323496,0.0000025088855,0.0006445189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989171,0.00008440604,0.00075944257,0.000026227292,0.000005160757,0.000008344197,0.000017915094,0.0000014960079,0.00017993353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894124,0.0005316466,0.0000718812,0.00010751817,0.00027436152,0.00007335439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887327,0.0048579993,0.004478989,0.0009493366,0.00058974244,0.00039119937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019666145,0.00031839393,0.00017058448,0.00039408132,0.00027289175,0.0010111049,0.00018456075,0.0003794688,0.00085022656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012996045,0.00015014333,0.00023729612,0.00020630225,0.0009075531,0.00053034746,0.000525001,0.00092078466,0.0000664745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014238758,0.0008256084,0.7938199,0.0004357602,0.00033737387,0.0007036969,0.023418074,0.0009243947,0.059185386,0.0029711786,0.00017235382,0.11578239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023153289,0.0013017342,0.98248035,0.000039419487,0.000081209946,0.0012973124,0.0049543255,0.0010134428,0.004695524,0.002890283,0.0011772824,0.000046016838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040690074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083079364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019666145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022163248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024652883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010400534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980785808","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12083","title":"Tapping generalized essentialism to predict outgroup prejudices","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Essentialism; Prejudice (legal term); Psychology; Outgroup; Social psychology; Perception; Unitary state; Power (physics); Covariance; Sociology; Mathematics; Gender studies; Statistics","score_opus":0.025891953786464566,"score_gpt":0.36879394391130466,"score_spread":0.3429019901248401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980785808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99865085,0.000017100596,0.0007255271,0.00003579344,0.0000024848318,0.0000045753986,0.000035804467,0.0000074299064,0.00052048883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992706,0.00001280257,0.00054822874,0.000006322067,0.0000012679357,0.0000028814125,0.00006760602,0.0000028527875,0.000087301996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995103,0.00022695253,0.000017816146,0.000091382746,0.000078776626,0.00007476545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959863,0.001611775,0.00066849747,0.0008191661,0.00032842305,0.00058585155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017607221,0.00049693347,0.0003576248,0.0008531876,0.00068701064,0.00093960814,0.0003050507,0.0004369373,0.0018144543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006819222,0.0002009095,0.00047620642,0.00044002075,0.0010784658,0.00071285013,0.0011016778,0.0011340113,0.00019112582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002110972,0.00014967406,0.97318655,0.000022284648,0.00012296198,0.00004688372,0.0021206837,0.0010037144,0.0021603596,0.0011047805,0.0002142688,0.01965681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006820619,0.00009562233,0.989976,0.000019022023,0.00003411588,0.000041519197,0.0012789869,0.004726729,0.0005402196,0.0029897573,0.0002740777,0.00001723003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037525803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072485484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037525803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061837235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010520131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07461476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990901248","doi":"10.1348/014466601164696","title":"Social identification and gender‐related ideology in women and men","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Psychological Association","keywords":"Ideology; Centrality; Psychology; Gender role; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Social identity theory; Disadvantage; System justification; Identification (biology); Perception; Cognition; Identity (music); Social group; Social cognition; Developmental psychology; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.03697890183802935,"score_gpt":0.38054926456178,"score_spread":0.34357036272375063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990901248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981335,0.00019013054,0.000024303052,0.000041910254,0.000009081934,0.0000020890677,0.000008447533,7.057799e-7,0.0015899112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937785,0.000080679456,0.00002531236,0.000016318032,0.0000074716736,0.0000033402234,0.000011340638,5.794886e-7,0.00047703585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961925,0.000137065,0.000013717609,0.00003945545,0.000086922984,0.00010362869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991425,0.00022135484,0.00031320975,0.000018646497,0.000064133324,0.00024008991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091282156,0.00023452904,0.0002779806,0.0012167895,0.00118338,0.0010501517,0.00013634295,0.00026835385,0.0025982624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028391532,0.00018850587,0.00018867022,0.00050013536,0.00094404776,0.00036642325,0.0007800678,0.0003161857,0.0002795183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055490737,0.00019684146,0.94121975,0.000037190093,0.00006819202,0.00042746143,0.032559305,0.00007558196,0.0013324232,0.001497463,0.000337875,0.02169297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018767478,0.00024615673,0.9825377,0.000023484665,0.000015568581,0.0003256562,0.014581043,0.00016348809,0.00020612584,0.00060767675,0.0012618954,0.000012360757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025842942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046367026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025982624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004020971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027544922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008692026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992638630","doi":"10.1348/014466608x324367","title":"Emotional reactions of anger and shame to the norm violation characterizing episodes of interpersonal harm","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Harm; Psychology; Blame; Anger; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Generalizability theory; Norm (philosophy); Attribution; Structural equation modeling; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.06014358544245028,"score_gpt":0.3604139539940565,"score_spread":0.3002703685516062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992638630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913173,0.000100265046,0.0014912445,0.0001344765,0.000020997704,0.0000477549,0.000058571044,0.000018503846,0.0068109035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981541,0.00013616006,0.00067093136,0.000095439544,0.000012032348,0.00005047998,0.000055422806,0.0000050540843,0.0008204641],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867576,0.00065812847,0.00006730275,0.00009151593,0.0004085894,0.00009876847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996588,0.0011314087,0.0015863415,0.00024251833,0.0002578821,0.00019380107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001271014,0.00028725804,0.00026435804,0.00022824363,0.0004640091,0.0013142882,0.00017592816,0.0006810468,0.0013096781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0081908805,0.00019288441,0.00026788376,0.00014501026,0.0011053971,0.0003590964,0.0011129741,0.0012147774,0.00021060415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031334471,0.0009794582,0.55959934,0.0011711769,0.0007088493,0.0022367272,0.16205038,0.0027614823,0.18221296,0.0074524875,0.0033884458,0.07430527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000421739,0.0011288523,0.9452072,0.00010688242,0.000093817514,0.0019158697,0.0368397,0.00127049,0.007336638,0.0028320511,0.0031362735,0.000090024194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048136237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006489268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0013142882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033704308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017379734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0067217946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994294430","doi":"10.1348/014466607x248903","title":"Distinguishing among perceived control, perceived difficulty, and self‐efficacy as determinants of intentions and behaviours","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; CLARITY; Perception; Control (management); Cognition; Empirical research; Perceived control; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.04756895825979877,"score_gpt":0.39195815927693933,"score_spread":0.34438920101714054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994294430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910052,0.0015766572,0.0022374862,0.00017747445,0.000021711396,0.00011302855,0.00014982492,0.000014913274,0.004703764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874747,0.0002681707,0.0006137596,0.000023806839,0.000012108704,0.00005323285,0.0001112758,0.000003047162,0.0001670422],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964127,0.0014711221,0.00039024185,0.0004436559,0.001006508,0.0002758321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93471354,0.04802617,0.0100638615,0.0027494128,0.0022911928,0.0021559098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008541233,0.0007632723,0.00068229606,0.0044717966,0.00040046484,0.0024284036,0.00062409486,0.0009303848,0.0015418364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034101617,0.00041792367,0.001781673,0.0023677938,0.0021705693,0.0017120334,0.001317668,0.0013687244,0.00011724065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021836656,0.00054272683,0.9712256,0.00023526563,0.00078427116,0.000052068364,0.001692996,0.0006409565,0.00037471438,0.0015267525,0.000069398964,0.022636857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015797785,0.0002721987,0.9947908,0.00009170849,0.00015367175,0.000056055196,0.00061508577,0.001473043,0.00018658534,0.0021197945,0.00019959106,0.000025712445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028136992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003286116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008541233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042825253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059359305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045170844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000158296","doi":"10.1348/014466607x269829","title":"The protest intentions of skilled immigrants with credentialing problems: A test of a model integrating relative deprivation theory with social identity theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Relative deprivation; Social psychology; Psychology; Blame; Social identity theory; Attribution; Identity (music); Immigration; Structural equation modeling; Social group; Political science","score_opus":0.03392365814117535,"score_gpt":0.3403387781924204,"score_spread":0.30641512005124505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000158296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99905485,0.000009606216,0.0001600633,0.00009247142,0.000002544901,0.000013633591,0.000007862265,8.325748e-7,0.0006581435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994885,0.000015957656,0.00019345988,0.0000350643,0.0000017090546,0.000020050307,0.000025867123,7.030433e-7,0.00021878496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988331,0.0005458529,0.000058735328,0.000119778015,0.00021015182,0.00023234216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99284583,0.0036575363,0.0019056093,0.00047121185,0.0004249672,0.0006947265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00350573,0.00044745085,0.0003919943,0.0007481545,0.0011561916,0.0014263516,0.0006718724,0.00079521403,0.0030509734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011067024,0.00028876305,0.00078480766,0.00036321417,0.0019562123,0.0009158533,0.0018599275,0.001649783,0.00029116956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035719608,0.0018214333,0.9455328,0.000066693596,0.00013539093,0.00016751618,0.030285114,0.0017916117,0.0006113653,0.004108096,0.00032770808,0.01479514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009593738,0.0009878618,0.92179245,0.000097368094,0.000086612454,0.00013959206,0.046809275,0.023374973,0.00030521155,0.0052710264,0.0009835338,0.000056225857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02806038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022294655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02806038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018872954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018622598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05579412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004274817","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12092","title":"The psychological disengagement model among women in science, engineering, and technology","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique; University of Ottawa; Université de Moncton","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Disengagement theory; Outgroup; Psychology; Discounting; Social psychology; Psychological science; Self-esteem; Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology; Gerontology","score_opus":0.015320708407680309,"score_gpt":0.333371320733288,"score_spread":0.3180506123256077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004274817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99940217,0.000083949104,0.000062585554,0.00016213527,0.000002534538,0.0000040264717,0.0000037618317,4.9873665e-7,0.00027832607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99978584,0.00006211345,0.00002601923,0.000025135074,0.000001991991,0.000003101946,0.0000044049716,2.8969774e-7,0.000091048714],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953127,0.00023028151,0.000021303458,0.000035465848,0.00007514804,0.00010643596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983919,0.0006832282,0.00042370465,0.00006904632,0.00009099133,0.00034099875],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011711317,0.00024289358,0.0002507092,0.0006200425,0.00089012284,0.0010899693,0.0002944786,0.00043227675,0.00083113334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044263247,0.00025464248,0.00032810908,0.00037923089,0.0011938103,0.00073088874,0.00089974893,0.00095560856,0.0000864158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029709766,0.00029426513,0.9265287,0.000041523905,0.000068185145,0.00043951024,0.050659653,0.00014591152,0.0014861104,0.00090981444,0.00013454953,0.01899483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002713963,0.0007049895,0.8875327,0.000043597294,0.000052192565,0.0008051532,0.10657391,0.001159457,0.00026636934,0.001859573,0.0009438761,0.00003112224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005102083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009247305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99910986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055152667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005075954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01014483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012439665","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12004","title":"Why and how are you attached to your <scp>S</scp> ocial <scp>G</scp> roup? Investigating different forms of social identification","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social identity theory; Psychology; Social psychology; Social identity approach; CLARITY; Social group; Identity (music); Collective identity; Ingroups and outgroups; Identification (biology); In-group favoritism","score_opus":0.05966268511319917,"score_gpt":0.36264791163570304,"score_spread":0.30298522652250387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012439665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9526386,0.001285298,0.0006221985,0.00942103,0.0002026634,0.00004221164,0.0002660058,0.000031329055,0.035490554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98011327,0.0010344395,0.00037087844,0.0013835875,0.000035349713,0.00002180156,0.00016332857,0.00001285783,0.01686443],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949086,0.00017673742,0.000012525849,0.00004333711,0.00013408839,0.00014249384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980597,0.00023174661,0.0005631297,0.00009213408,0.0005808301,0.0004724232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001230363,0.000119613986,0.00019939367,0.0005312881,0.0029414336,0.0016885118,0.0003191105,0.00059473916,0.009380573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036972484,0.00010255301,0.00016510984,0.0005531144,0.0021153702,0.001005435,0.0005415182,0.0007450013,0.00221378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001390435,0.00025769876,0.693534,0.0002456507,0.00008581724,0.00091820717,0.062941454,0.00016943092,0.0013838821,0.0040230197,0.05313263,0.18316925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006565156,0.00013452319,0.79766095,0.00020789786,0.00003688661,0.0005634079,0.15536924,0.00028612636,0.0005952924,0.0011793678,0.043903492,0.000056296558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2344119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3814501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2344119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025313233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017247563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4660949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017261494","doi":"10.1348/014466604x17452","title":"Bridging the intention–behaviour gap: The role of moral norm","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":369,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Moderation; Theory of planned behavior; Legal norm; Norm (philosophy); Social norms approach; Control (management); Epistemology","score_opus":0.061374692727518054,"score_gpt":0.4081453881527747,"score_spread":0.3467706954252566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017261494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97582597,0.0005638516,0.009123244,0.0014983023,0.000079218175,0.000042476866,0.000053183805,0.000018312838,0.012795479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857783,0.00007969985,0.0010803652,0.00009362036,0.0000143354755,0.000021550164,0.000022304706,0.000007208742,0.00010311989],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881357,0.0074086175,0.0005235321,0.0010931161,0.0022360357,0.0006030681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8805113,0.09680824,0.009698799,0.0056011677,0.005052068,0.0023285088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018338619,0.0002443078,0.000748014,0.0011085232,0.00071875344,0.0031816442,0.0006330461,0.0008578933,0.002468456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100953534,0.00029082084,0.0003795761,0.0008537788,0.0031127466,0.0039373105,0.002398532,0.0021028386,0.00016981621],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012154888,0.0018507373,0.7547578,0.0005802421,0.0006639379,0.00033941123,0.031583406,0.001633547,0.0025016104,0.056308024,0.00065338984,0.14791241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044927183,0.0005013192,0.9159572,0.0003432126,0.00013572775,0.00021858947,0.009955994,0.006303231,0.00080572214,0.06343608,0.0022065723,0.000091392045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020450407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019351341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018338619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000797659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018012715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09698504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021207501","doi":"10.1348/014466604x17542","title":"Opposition to redistributive employment policies for women: The role of policy experience and group interest","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Opposition (politics); Affirmative action; Meritocracy; Social psychology; Interest group; Psychology; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.03304048331982808,"score_gpt":0.39947140085497274,"score_spread":0.3664309175351447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021207501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986457,0.000049871574,0.000039184873,0.00010072356,0.0000035355488,0.0000022964934,0.000004948765,4.5780178e-7,0.00115325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997023,0.000026456142,0.000015004836,0.000022009057,0.0000049971322,0.0000020933212,0.000004959919,5.6563596e-7,0.00022152957],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928516,0.00038017432,0.00002131195,0.00006593504,0.000091061884,0.00015636925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945956,0.0033333844,0.0011529671,0.0001436636,0.0001508151,0.0006235831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014541327,0.00014128182,0.00018332008,0.00036689758,0.00063351024,0.0012639854,0.00020382596,0.000433953,0.0033803985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064904336,0.00011527362,0.00015602654,0.00022290315,0.0010030722,0.00053702656,0.00077057915,0.0005749905,0.00019018723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008073228,0.0006830811,0.934513,0.000048378795,0.00006828909,0.00046529117,0.042372033,0.00011549073,0.002518952,0.0011811969,0.0001871213,0.017039858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020856394,0.0004424684,0.9637143,0.000029614175,0.000025945237,0.00020161562,0.033047102,0.0002628137,0.00037417782,0.00063081394,0.0012341194,0.000016272637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018913776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033055644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033803985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033132127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031965063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011308551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027127327","doi":"10.1348/014466604x23437","title":"Attitude change and the public–private attitude distinction","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Attitude change; Social psychology; Attitude","score_opus":0.06951888069193081,"score_gpt":0.37674566049381253,"score_spread":0.30722677980188173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027127327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91659504,0.00078253547,0.01978162,0.0053550773,0.00019180002,0.00015143689,0.000066953246,0.000028436922,0.057047166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982849,0.000056891884,0.0010837668,0.00021138767,0.000045870955,0.00007906637,0.000011481747,0.0000040289187,0.00022269443],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97901785,0.012418264,0.0010707059,0.0014192059,0.0052032834,0.0008706845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9282198,0.05227809,0.010377421,0.0047472613,0.0025897278,0.0017877932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012947605,0.00027774906,0.00049894257,0.0015448425,0.0015690835,0.00311935,0.00051411474,0.00186873,0.0031961345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049920943,0.0002798687,0.00048652478,0.00085978577,0.0071359714,0.003935013,0.0034689629,0.0029300873,0.00024995883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021987287,0.0024112642,0.3816268,0.0010059671,0.00041446037,0.00050058536,0.07561706,0.000924009,0.010014816,0.3235596,0.0014805696,0.20024619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018881963,0.0013266059,0.7783339,0.00037796263,0.00015758652,0.00082844263,0.02114401,0.003020918,0.0031367734,0.17935504,0.012007934,0.00012208086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055144145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006207917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012947605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012158423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055623066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06847429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029548332","doi":"10.1348/014466603763276162","title":"Investigating multiple components of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived control: An examination of the theory of planned behaviour in the exercise domain","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":556,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Psychology; Theory of planned behavior; Social norms approach; Population; Social psychology; Norm (philosophy); Variance (accounting); Controllability; Ambiguity; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Control (management)","score_opus":0.05213833266439986,"score_gpt":0.3658282401462758,"score_spread":0.3136899074818759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029548332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97281885,0.00035265952,0.023585996,0.0005930676,0.000020022972,0.00011530098,0.000025083556,0.000012829449,0.0024762072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940276,0.000117309166,0.005634071,0.000040917694,0.000008470055,0.00007360193,0.000018225921,0.000002137419,0.00007771466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953537,0.0030523606,0.0002264197,0.00029660162,0.0008961984,0.00017479598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9707343,0.023425937,0.002356515,0.0012356098,0.0016818584,0.00056580396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014605613,0.00044266385,0.00053700246,0.0018985945,0.00059148396,0.002113877,0.0006357303,0.00061169785,0.0007997494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02446977,0.00043060718,0.0013216648,0.0011735717,0.0025442687,0.0020786203,0.0013808025,0.0012932251,0.000049406102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016205631,0.00043168757,0.90181595,0.00022333123,0.0003313786,0.00015260877,0.012741842,0.0025339634,0.0013932282,0.011985513,0.00011875146,0.068109676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031446576,0.0009692877,0.9224674,0.0002165322,0.00025639025,0.00030117182,0.009761895,0.043717578,0.0011740512,0.020162247,0.0008840982,0.000057845282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049557136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008842443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014605613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012500379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026426844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07724279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039335428","doi":"10.1348/014466607x258696","title":"Illusion of control by proxy: Placing one's fate in the hands of another","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Carleton University","funders":"Research Centre for the Humanities; Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre","keywords":"Illusion of control; Lottery; Luck; Psychology; Ticket; Social psychology; Illusion; Perception; Advertising; Roulette; Control (management); Cognitive psychology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.10838281614715406,"score_gpt":0.4001128352617986,"score_spread":0.2917300191146445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039335428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97213554,0.0006262733,0.009451923,0.0005859814,0.000051025192,0.00002179256,0.000012133008,0.000011842253,0.017103506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99901044,0.000088302615,0.0004003023,0.00012648127,0.000009833564,0.0000060957277,0.0000054578477,0.0000020053096,0.000351019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782974,0.0012447732,0.000088173445,0.00024895748,0.00044012157,0.00014828052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904614,0.004352321,0.0023637943,0.0016980966,0.00035484988,0.0007695721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029307366,0.00034836424,0.00026244493,0.000569784,0.00072145724,0.0022660787,0.000469998,0.00075990264,0.002350208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013293788,0.00016657158,0.00029670948,0.00024825873,0.005246655,0.0027241288,0.0018186131,0.0017177778,0.00015384261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005135698,0.001887092,0.27535173,0.00089333433,0.0003502477,0.0035935687,0.13236935,0.0025107975,0.114415154,0.28033572,0.001969576,0.18118775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059571187,0.007546244,0.44688305,0.0014761639,0.0006099455,0.018873151,0.115248874,0.01910944,0.05444779,0.28213513,0.052343305,0.00073118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006763067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053399586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029307366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046943224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003827576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015499353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056864833","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12072","title":"The nature of professional and relational self‐aspects at the goal and narrative levels of personality","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of California, Riverside","keywords":"Narrative; Personality; Psychology; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Self; Big Five personality traits; Self-concept; Sociology; Social science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02726657682338127,"score_gpt":0.36484570453910836,"score_spread":0.33757912771572707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056864833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9824273,0.00021777938,0.0030009078,0.00037323576,0.000008855935,0.00002070626,0.000020126716,0.0000061356036,0.01392476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871016,0.000052739353,0.0007934367,0.000017138052,0.0000017229603,0.000010379093,0.000009172096,0.0000015409236,0.00040381998],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832016,0.0010504829,0.000083898616,0.000112242415,0.00030599267,0.00012722687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551105,0.002290222,0.00066895026,0.00043525232,0.0005409389,0.0005536086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027794086,0.00011276543,0.00011396949,0.0007529222,0.0009111714,0.0024662626,0.0002531045,0.00027191342,0.00095782214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00847083,0.00016209914,0.00014686896,0.0004726217,0.0024737183,0.001829313,0.0014013228,0.000632926,0.00007398207],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017731353,0.000117998046,0.28837818,0.00031586317,0.00006781766,0.00082309986,0.549099,0.0004060129,0.011292434,0.06925934,0.0005135517,0.07954941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012248984,0.00015113674,0.6896271,0.00018286415,0.000030295225,0.0015728098,0.26163793,0.0011962431,0.002044108,0.032665126,0.010825853,0.000054358454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010742198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017552235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027794086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006764009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008404264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014699101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057223659","doi":"10.1348/014466604x18532","title":"Talk about receiving, giving, and taking in radio interviews: doing modesty and making a virtue out of necessity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Active listening; Psychology; Social psychology; Irony; Epistemology; Communication","score_opus":0.05108253517345,"score_gpt":0.3583164804648258,"score_spread":0.30723394529137577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057223659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91459775,0.0013709082,0.010713266,0.011125155,0.00025738246,0.00020622885,0.000059251,0.0000681484,0.06160194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947568,0.0003624507,0.0016147587,0.00059308554,0.000049975348,0.00011533569,0.000011179929,0.000024766268,0.0024717439],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9572793,0.038990464,0.00055929023,0.0006696567,0.0010811283,0.001420132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9506497,0.041985344,0.003142887,0.0009892249,0.0011282801,0.002104528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026455408,0.0006603336,0.0006025936,0.001777783,0.012439438,0.006786842,0.001379379,0.0028732617,0.003137306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033921376,0.0005765477,0.00037389222,0.0011118413,0.028075607,0.007339077,0.0062449714,0.0035285302,0.0005344419],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023887886,0.000012490094,0.0006646376,0.00005703614,0.0000028532759,0.00024324248,0.9917936,0.000021271506,0.0005386533,0.0044524404,0.00033608588,0.0018538578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059558984,0.000037868194,0.0010372497,0.0001615427,0.0000065789623,0.00031071366,0.9835369,0.00006245054,0.000460779,0.0020320532,0.012328282,0.000019580426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002065768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030752206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026455408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027380956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024221602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13991123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057840240","doi":"10.1348/014466600164291","title":"Social categorization and stereotyping: ‘You mean I'm one of “them”?’","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV","keywords":"Categorization; Psychology; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Stereotype (UML); Social psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Social category; Social group; Social cognition; Cognitive bias; Social perception; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Perception; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05309695195803412,"score_gpt":0.3631273548293738,"score_spread":0.3100304028713397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057840240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924164,0.00023800379,0.00043148056,0.0010369073,0.000033450553,0.00000883124,0.0000155978,0.0000054002053,0.0058138384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99906117,0.00009261886,0.00022714713,0.00023084368,0.000014898583,0.0000096094645,0.000015088543,0.0000027141189,0.0003459807],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988582,0.00067666953,0.000030024066,0.000100928475,0.00022524601,0.000108909706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935753,0.0027313337,0.0025596942,0.0002897891,0.00043688234,0.0004069829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002660799,0.000112269314,0.00015200171,0.0005229174,0.00054466265,0.00083786837,0.00020357482,0.00063588086,0.002070884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01140993,0.00009146251,0.00012344423,0.0003425241,0.0018239182,0.0009190745,0.00059032545,0.0005959825,0.00018671952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016534146,0.000861489,0.6099003,0.0003931352,0.0001800924,0.0012341742,0.14245485,0.00029648867,0.029970802,0.01294533,0.007365488,0.19274457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044492233,0.00042421822,0.9190162,0.00008011275,0.000041685485,0.0010259422,0.05640708,0.00072670996,0.002643527,0.012559705,0.0069716675,0.000058676174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014159151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024120985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002660799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047417625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002687443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014071822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066093734","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12030","title":"Priming motivation through unattended speech","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Priming (agriculture); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.03711276486174224,"score_gpt":0.33413460711939497,"score_spread":0.2970218422576527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066093734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948,0.00025448253,0.0022589678,0.00008857751,0.00010266453,0.000038102888,0.000026769054,0.000044664197,0.002385767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962863,0.00012929937,0.0021457358,0.000078906945,0.000048032733,0.00006288965,0.000033234774,0.00003229825,0.0011832921],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925023,0.0002644916,0.00003581178,0.00022022458,0.00015071398,0.00007845051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783915,0.0012978498,0.00036188358,0.00013919693,0.00013273147,0.00022923859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008868753,0.00035793058,0.00033287995,0.00019571817,0.0002267124,0.00063112343,0.0003251276,0.0005572888,0.00356082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043723136,0.00026171005,0.0001907928,0.00006820555,0.0005963672,0.0005184196,0.0008210639,0.00063005515,0.00047771473],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017570428,0.00057788816,0.0030728355,0.00037379502,0.000021269952,0.0004107121,0.0029649565,0.00006154794,0.9713003,0.001728921,0.00013525442,0.017595397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008991384,0.016237523,0.21293691,0.00026331007,0.00030042807,0.0029657746,0.003971055,0.0031913877,0.7363242,0.010656252,0.012102276,0.00015178663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000825269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010812759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00356082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016813638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002824875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0119121075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066518403","doi":"10.1348/014466610x526018","title":"The cultural narratives of Francophone and Anglophone Quebecers: Using a historical perspective to explore the relationships among collective relative deprivation, in‐group entitativity, and collective esteem","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Statistics Canada","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Collective identity; Narrative; Psychology; Social psychology; Social identity theory; Relative deprivation; Perspective (graphical); Collective action; Identity (music); Collective responsibility; French; Social group; Sociology; Humanities; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.07272025574691934,"score_gpt":0.3667585842130659,"score_spread":0.2940383284661465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066518403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971867,0.00026609167,0.00007289168,0.00029292345,0.000007687965,0.000007064624,0.00007588684,0.0000013516826,0.00208929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99821496,0.00025684206,0.000074691496,0.00006430715,0.000004044952,0.0000084260155,0.000066622706,0.0000021260464,0.001308043],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935335,0.00034356388,0.000021590113,0.000050178798,0.00008447883,0.0001468342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972269,0.0012668682,0.0005575547,0.00007487061,0.00043498894,0.000438849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016546565,0.00044820237,0.00024900853,0.0012147565,0.0059988373,0.002437972,0.0006417775,0.0006247804,0.002630763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037333304,0.00020751772,0.00013934585,0.0013557593,0.0036243931,0.0013167585,0.001431366,0.0008301981,0.000101322505],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007706757,0.000021856915,0.044471994,0.000055196335,0.000013538098,0.0007061356,0.9466132,0.00007230954,0.00085991074,0.000705811,0.000663832,0.005739205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026074454,0.00003053721,0.08229721,0.00007867944,0.000009815802,0.00022481677,0.9102881,0.00011183372,0.0002168315,0.00008300843,0.006631182,0.000025275418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7036452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8688853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29635477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009980441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034556675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5962001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068779581","doi":"10.1348/014466602321149902","title":"Testing the social identity‐intergroup differentiation hypothesis: ‘We're not American eh!’","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social identity theory; Salience (neuroscience); Social psychology; Conceptualization; Social identity approach; Social group; Identity (music); Relevance (law); Personal identity; Developmental psychology; Self-concept; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.10778078262783508,"score_gpt":0.3710703630656277,"score_spread":0.2632895804377926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068779581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99327254,0.000063242594,0.00062086986,0.00079439016,0.000056257068,0.000052641433,0.00010685931,0.000003927138,0.005029204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973726,0.000051031675,0.0012711909,0.00028119507,0.000027000275,0.00011937805,0.0001879822,0.0000026197915,0.000686926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757963,0.0009793846,0.00010340748,0.0004242048,0.00062627613,0.00028707954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98261756,0.009605264,0.0028229633,0.0016677323,0.0020536743,0.0012328444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0079635205,0.00036943075,0.00041709465,0.0005088935,0.002063414,0.0012438056,0.001407888,0.0008895204,0.0058585946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026860662,0.00017691543,0.00042980176,0.0008153986,0.0033700797,0.00198848,0.0018326987,0.0011890783,0.0006319203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011860764,0.0014982704,0.90922344,0.00012711794,0.00021160688,0.00036672986,0.02499711,0.0003136129,0.0023952958,0.013630392,0.0032346996,0.042815726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022521944,0.0015331068,0.9504053,0.00008212341,0.00015242337,0.00023225433,0.02858388,0.0026929248,0.0021441285,0.0068094754,0.0070926487,0.000046596128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051857144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03416824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9481429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001416394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029535703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10311061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071649225","doi":"10.1348/014466600164462","title":"Social identity and the true believer: Responses to threatened self‐stereotypes among the intrinsically religious","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; St. Jerome's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Categorization; Religious identity; Religious orientation; Social identity theory; Identity (music); Perception; Social identity approach; Social group; Epistemology; Religiosity","score_opus":0.02542867606904552,"score_gpt":0.3668491694989293,"score_spread":0.3414204934298838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071649225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99879706,0.000019757392,0.000057656613,0.000081087775,0.0000082167435,0.000007084803,0.000006287878,0.0000014556292,0.001021338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946064,0.000025595153,0.00006704744,0.000083526764,0.0000081496555,0.000011641923,0.000011145912,0.0000015598142,0.00033079358],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909914,0.00045883926,0.000030013269,0.000070448674,0.0002522503,0.000089328336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99334234,0.0029586663,0.0019053862,0.00041095706,0.0004962251,0.0008863759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014822946,0.0002438905,0.00023730537,0.00053798023,0.0007844215,0.0011304816,0.00025097324,0.00093885144,0.0023986767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011750113,0.0001907897,0.00015059239,0.00015097311,0.0013988155,0.0005108166,0.0010872331,0.001813956,0.00032668735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025627827,0.0022485056,0.727066,0.00019309849,0.00014511136,0.0012756108,0.17937492,0.0003119739,0.0526046,0.002462924,0.001101875,0.030652683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046874484,0.0009937193,0.9127984,0.00005238096,0.000029109833,0.00060303434,0.079294406,0.0010279382,0.0021499689,0.0013979804,0.0015542095,0.000052032596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016404634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018279908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023986767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042281492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018444676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008024335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077170090","doi":"10.1348/014466605x53695","title":"Three ways to forgive: A numerically aided phenomenological study","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Forgiveness; Psychology; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; CLARITY; Interpersonal relationship; Theme (computing); Experiential learning","score_opus":0.03579846106590434,"score_gpt":0.3521770172047431,"score_spread":0.31637855613883875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077170090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97018886,0.0014217985,0.012298341,0.0024890334,0.00013911435,0.0005559041,0.00019743698,0.000070645016,0.012638847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99104685,0.0012161952,0.0036867757,0.00068006123,0.00003462259,0.00029391283,0.00009677585,0.0000432872,0.0029015127],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995182,0.0033495934,0.00021415124,0.00035562355,0.00045362,0.00044500004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99315053,0.0050802715,0.00040251677,0.0004784315,0.000279895,0.0006083484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005587389,0.00096333394,0.001131205,0.0023049465,0.009687429,0.0060848286,0.0018598436,0.0033652335,0.002139404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015023051,0.00092173874,0.0006529627,0.0018098026,0.014828347,0.008055641,0.007881619,0.0047537736,0.0004592238],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007884793,0.00008527804,0.0021875747,0.0001307106,0.0000066994735,0.0021043178,0.98265153,0.00007416409,0.0015009164,0.005214954,0.000404034,0.005560989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019584773,0.00015088709,0.003760963,0.00015419918,0.000010174681,0.0033847345,0.9683917,0.00022926318,0.0007490725,0.004883756,0.01820533,0.000060250488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001926577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028704733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009687429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026195664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015687138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029549241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078118675","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12101","title":"Tweeting about sexism: The well‐being benefits of a social media collective action","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Media Influence and Health","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Action (physics); Collective action; Psychology; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Social media; Cognition; Communication; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.12123602155173539,"score_gpt":0.35771557870046344,"score_spread":0.23647955714872804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078118675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938036,0.000634946,0.0001309648,0.0007064411,0.0000448179,0.000012510001,0.00004576536,0.0000046925124,0.004616235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998517,0.00036228448,0.00015964365,0.00010010185,0.0000345766,0.000010639941,0.000019299547,0.0000020504947,0.0007944859],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997639,0.00012296296,0.000008297304,0.000028219967,0.000038285605,0.000038281443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871874,0.00059483363,0.00034089477,0.00007250167,0.000049652306,0.0002234142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004319754,0.00016759952,0.00014283729,0.00029297062,0.00052387506,0.00078533206,0.00010753705,0.0003639079,0.0047404864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022257303,0.00010792342,0.00022749712,0.0001735223,0.00041826442,0.00044340588,0.0006039042,0.00048011733,0.0001567051],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009761606,0.006031276,0.42127582,0.0013592916,0.0007384599,0.0011553456,0.02339003,0.00036299683,0.090988696,0.004191967,0.0026829971,0.43806145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008593976,0.0034470945,0.9706598,0.00015396348,0.00024790867,0.0003861494,0.011363533,0.0002959392,0.0045462092,0.0021975867,0.006583747,0.00003206909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057880546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013318431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047404864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018003951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001590726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015858471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079007373","doi":"10.1348/014466609x468042","title":"Losing on all fronts: The effects of negative versus positive person‐based campaigns on implicit and explicit evaluations of political candidates","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Politics; Social psychology; Statement (logic); Adversary; Implicit attitude; Associative property; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.040432534969329685,"score_gpt":0.40842079051256025,"score_spread":0.36798825554323056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079007373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99647045,0.00004565995,0.00006131392,0.000042479543,0.0000112497555,0.0000051125376,0.0000042890583,0.00000236316,0.0033571175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991424,0.000056912577,0.00014364847,0.00005725227,0.000015072696,0.000008218308,0.000015123251,0.000005841196,0.00055538106],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988888,0.0006150199,0.000044747765,0.00009237487,0.00024672606,0.000112374815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890687,0.007297484,0.0019092022,0.00052044133,0.00042814578,0.0007759694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001729924,0.0003727539,0.00023853648,0.00023717893,0.00047508633,0.0011976737,0.00017748974,0.00049120747,0.004094913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012651833,0.00015846311,0.00017916168,0.00014398913,0.00077736157,0.00068409997,0.000636661,0.0011395845,0.00036501558],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.047113437,0.017774113,0.37818772,0.0013762551,0.00070961565,0.0011293651,0.034644812,0.0020471918,0.25771853,0.005839091,0.001681064,0.2517788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006178775,0.00842498,0.95734036,0.0001415841,0.00038191525,0.0004109758,0.007382166,0.001570675,0.0179981,0.0028110195,0.0028240245,0.00009632012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048416923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080527907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004094913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017922542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019882014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013698816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094069497","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12079","title":"‘More than skin‐deep’: Biological essentialism in response to a distinctiveness threat in a stigmatized fan community","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Essentialism; Psychology; Social psychology; Ingroups and outgroups; Outgroup; Affect (linguistics); Sociology; Gender studies; Communication","score_opus":0.04281651974706219,"score_gpt":0.39834527266769654,"score_spread":0.35552875292063435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094069497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990827,0.000009415818,0.00009551375,0.00005548267,0.0000030507351,0.0000039727925,0.0000017377477,0.0000012320795,0.0007467907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996697,0.0000074831696,0.00010563871,0.000034878034,0.0000020083999,0.0000026496423,0.0000040152545,8.431357e-7,0.00017274996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994267,0.00029644888,0.000013329004,0.000054436736,0.00012653299,0.000082606995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769056,0.0006724851,0.0008026418,0.00021527988,0.00015126621,0.00046775726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011639051,0.00023484591,0.00016634716,0.00029050242,0.00095533405,0.0005613762,0.00017369694,0.00044588203,0.0024383639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004068642,0.000113411596,0.00014886842,0.000082960796,0.0012590633,0.00037381254,0.0011032772,0.0009539425,0.000102223596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034894696,0.0031683992,0.6270785,0.00024325972,0.00012223821,0.002146774,0.06984912,0.0003075594,0.22345291,0.0037913846,0.00084112416,0.06550926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040461873,0.0025336577,0.9565994,0.000059331825,0.000029222967,0.0015296307,0.026372382,0.0011484568,0.0074656573,0.00247849,0.001704087,0.000039217062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009456411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015777773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024383639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002280994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002250373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008157134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094199917","doi":"10.1348/014466609x480624","title":"Changes in social identities over time: The role of coping and adaptation processes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"University of Queensland","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Coping (psychology); Social identity theory; Social support; Adaptation (eye); Social group; Social identity approach; Path analysis (statistics); Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.02387395898175875,"score_gpt":0.34838053633471155,"score_spread":0.3245065773529528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094199917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958792,0.0003192029,0.0011320601,0.00025923285,0.000012165344,0.000022760043,0.000013736414,0.000006875222,0.0023549413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907935,0.00013406642,0.0005492274,0.000025569703,0.000006597816,0.000016116095,0.000015616279,0.0000017818767,0.00017161066],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989779,0.00053743017,0.000031626703,0.00015062996,0.00015779924,0.00014465662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645257,0.0015361214,0.0010402201,0.00037279722,0.00015270639,0.00044554737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030225066,0.00031781892,0.0002689463,0.00060602056,0.00064853916,0.0017931466,0.00040084965,0.00058303616,0.0012916944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076047718,0.000186378,0.0002904714,0.00051716674,0.0014008365,0.0015694869,0.0011378212,0.0009249908,0.00012048753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071357336,0.0019674508,0.6936328,0.00024268572,0.0003458456,0.00073067157,0.05882713,0.0017959226,0.011891031,0.009972453,0.00039924294,0.21948136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015237269,0.00046791325,0.97739434,0.000055197335,0.00004036614,0.00032436915,0.011773108,0.001620612,0.00058715726,0.0065097376,0.0011649766,0.000046882644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008155828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012336011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030225066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036931192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041514475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015984714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105126605","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12003","title":"Social change in <scp>S</scp> outh <scp>A</scp> frica: A historical approach to relative deprivation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs; Queen's University; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Relative deprivation; Social identity theory; Social psychology; Psychology; Group (periodic table); Identity (music); Social comparison theory; Ingroups and outgroups; Social group; Trajectory; Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.09385920480522922,"score_gpt":0.36929092871553254,"score_spread":0.27543172391030335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105126605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964682,0.000093267765,0.00012497437,0.0005634768,0.000012761164,0.0000064147707,0.000022188473,0.0000011344307,0.0027077124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999416,0.000060420072,0.00006270656,0.00003305188,0.0000031383254,0.0000057455663,0.0000104427345,6.6285344e-7,0.00040791565],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995358,0.00021013246,0.00002049075,0.000049530077,0.000068877416,0.000115167684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936384,0.00012308935,0.0002492387,0.000043913347,0.00007709474,0.00014285439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008789259,0.00010660022,0.00012911308,0.0007947194,0.0033612908,0.0012296138,0.0002937686,0.00032520478,0.003280762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002079102,0.00008676946,0.0001152257,0.00082221243,0.002200403,0.001501128,0.0019244363,0.0007089012,0.00010666102],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016674312,0.00025540873,0.53783965,0.00014299176,0.000041713018,0.0011092222,0.39589214,0.0002926092,0.0038181227,0.012483595,0.0020930264,0.04586473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048822835,0.00014080381,0.68764603,0.00007459729,0.000010659771,0.00032071702,0.29978308,0.00024515204,0.00058360613,0.0020303149,0.009140937,0.000019253906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025230853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061639246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025230853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020702868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088720623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050167978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105384888","doi":"10.1348/0144666041501714","title":"Why are men more likely to support group‐based dominance than women? The mediating role of gender identification","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Social dominance orientation; Psychology; Social psychology; Dominance (genetics); Situational ethics; Social identity theory; Ideology; Structural equation modeling; Perspective (graphical); Social group; Developmental psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.028000365801760477,"score_gpt":0.35331345710806344,"score_spread":0.325313091306303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105384888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912197,0.0004593281,0.00033583696,0.0020789558,0.000054914195,0.000007246797,0.000071026036,0.0000039724246,0.0057690535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993111,0.0001356892,0.000061253486,0.00010022552,0.00002143873,0.0000027240121,0.000014813707,0.0000014152542,0.00035128088],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991788,0.00031482,0.000028813743,0.00012917588,0.00016663263,0.00018170635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951632,0.0023266096,0.0013436328,0.00016903078,0.00021077669,0.0007866864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014327174,0.00017589326,0.0002832337,0.0006670134,0.0006318492,0.0012561202,0.00025342224,0.000549293,0.0116452705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009792722,0.00013826767,0.0001854431,0.00040651282,0.001019649,0.00067642826,0.00037077785,0.00042109293,0.0007180082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026084602,0.00012816164,0.95361817,0.00007379474,0.0001282235,0.00042295177,0.0062850975,0.00004536332,0.0017286962,0.0024738743,0.0009552004,0.033879515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027479644,0.0001799716,0.9767388,0.000049003884,0.000058499645,0.00066919613,0.015205436,0.00025752612,0.00039105926,0.004135912,0.0022706324,0.000016519947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025881417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002944894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0116452705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016601378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034684548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03895724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105604706","doi":"10.1348/014466605x37477","title":"Parental bonding and depressive affect: The mediating role of coping resources","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Stressor; Psychology; Coping (psychology); Developmental psychology; Affect (linguistics); Cognition; Psychological resilience; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.013805646054801285,"score_gpt":0.3038011925638444,"score_spread":0.28999554650904313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105604706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930306,0.0018440742,0.0002435233,0.00076152297,0.000025732632,0.000015494667,0.000061001596,0.000003613796,0.0040145325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981681,0.0009850737,0.00022949991,0.000061296734,0.000012841633,0.000010439626,0.000027733035,0.0000013055377,0.000503667],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959594,0.00021280642,0.000015949634,0.000039803435,0.00004766133,0.00008784513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832064,0.0007338093,0.00032480297,0.00007914283,0.00007388526,0.0004676957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009669809,0.00039336985,0.00029177175,0.00041333385,0.00059450604,0.0009687238,0.000390422,0.0005190235,0.0037716439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004134885,0.00029728966,0.00023934842,0.00026372116,0.0005676987,0.00047090137,0.0009560069,0.00071566884,0.0001180756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040938606,0.00058903935,0.95231664,0.000095928954,0.00034892242,0.0012464304,0.004267644,0.00020752236,0.0016578397,0.0033666976,0.00056463014,0.034929298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013061748,0.0001415145,0.9962947,0.000083000785,0.000103628176,0.0003440323,0.0013521039,0.00019344917,0.00014458943,0.0007585107,0.00056297326,0.000008466863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038333735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006419301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038333735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003007121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000497213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01261735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109963254","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12018","title":"The effects of autonomous and controlled regulation of performance‐approach goals on well‐being: A process model","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports","field":"Psychology","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Concordance; Social psychology; Process (computing); Structural equation modeling; Test (biology); Well-being; Goal orientation; Applied psychology; Computer science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.015635872579770258,"score_gpt":0.3095047252250342,"score_spread":0.2938688526452639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109963254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8985707,0.00051087333,0.064498834,0.001498094,0.0000337864,0.00035608906,0.00017681194,0.00011765775,0.03423717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939162,0.0001524152,0.0050664125,0.000027988366,0.000008351652,0.0001484879,0.00003445535,0.000007523404,0.0006383319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844813,0.0007263507,0.000049719965,0.00024502215,0.00032038972,0.00021034888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933276,0.0045428798,0.0007510886,0.0004892048,0.0003891106,0.0005001168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003996814,0.0007900143,0.0005404699,0.0011442963,0.0005493336,0.0024145998,0.00074662577,0.001044087,0.003213286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067235753,0.00047349694,0.0012959451,0.0005461796,0.0021897617,0.001653059,0.0018359823,0.0010769084,0.0002870798],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021256881,0.0054684463,0.32858837,0.0009241914,0.00089561095,0.0014951113,0.027493864,0.03254529,0.02085052,0.44879276,0.0008163256,0.13000381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055173604,0.0032584015,0.53885317,0.00040876842,0.0008416685,0.00087686273,0.003970534,0.16137394,0.0063915793,0.27819997,0.0050171195,0.00025628493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030088425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014572559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003996814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011758714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002019038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021137476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111612557","doi":"10.1348/014466604x17605","title":"Discrimination between dominant and subordinate groups: The positive–negative asymmetry effect and normative processes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Social identity theory; Outcome (game theory); Normative; Categorization; Ingroups and outgroups; In-group favoritism; Social comparison theory; Salary; Social group; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.014675120431761208,"score_gpt":0.35102587547572006,"score_spread":0.33635075504395884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111612557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923344,0.000029470822,0.0023396665,0.00007722685,0.00000864778,0.000027029328,0.000018912138,0.000006617293,0.005158006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887556,0.000014623594,0.0008754582,0.00003402546,0.000008043556,0.00002513035,0.000019213461,0.0000037609936,0.0001441697],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732697,0.0013725667,0.00011183877,0.0002877292,0.00075961166,0.00014119623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820274,0.011784709,0.00271898,0.0019147944,0.0007829288,0.0007711443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004977015,0.0002275034,0.00032347997,0.0007214737,0.00053087855,0.00047502224,0.00034631847,0.00033603917,0.0028565233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02281116,0.00015572898,0.00013039936,0.00019617069,0.001573366,0.0010743467,0.001388885,0.0007488318,0.00015414422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007313941,0.0029875406,0.35853067,0.0005170715,0.00015693966,0.0006253607,0.012005053,0.0009541425,0.37669438,0.031782646,0.0010634934,0.20736879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015564695,0.0021721767,0.9269339,0.00005557729,0.0000478571,0.0010272753,0.0030875772,0.005025234,0.024359124,0.03510215,0.001961273,0.00007227453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027226907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052143645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004977015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027086807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029949925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026321292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134606327","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12005","title":"Nations' income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":251,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Ambivalence; Inequality; Economic inequality; Stereotype (UML); Social psychology; System justification; Psychology; Life expectancy; Social inequality; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Demography","score_opus":0.2187365579817343,"score_gpt":0.414065584981602,"score_spread":0.1953290269998677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134606327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99563485,0.000078851976,0.00008746499,0.00019395631,0.0000061754977,0.0000036859656,0.000035103556,0.0000018915405,0.003957948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996848,0.00003777978,0.00004184374,0.00003130274,0.000002379413,0.000002522367,0.00003781262,0.000001814187,0.00015982198],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994654,0.0002610489,0.00003009881,0.000043722073,0.00009303628,0.00010663733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951615,0.0015972373,0.0018266614,0.0003503736,0.00030110707,0.0007631305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001251281,0.00017730487,0.00018235705,0.00083753915,0.00070977694,0.0018463079,0.0002198674,0.00046939668,0.0049769324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070479237,0.00018725565,0.00030423832,0.0004920798,0.0010988405,0.0008851093,0.0016033403,0.0008867959,0.00040680997],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010417567,0.0001670145,0.9877266,0.000011966653,0.00005057974,0.0000921655,0.0052943686,0.00012252168,0.00026744994,0.00079276063,0.00038420956,0.0049861795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003943658,0.000040429957,0.9910449,0.000025204425,0.0000154433,0.00009156316,0.0067140018,0.00034393885,0.0000891025,0.0011171025,0.0005064588,0.000007981899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037497878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048410613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049769324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034603794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024287897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016649485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135368225","doi":"10.1348/014466608x389582","title":"When I equals we: Exploring the relation between social and personal identity of extreme right‐wing political party members","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Social psychology; Personal identity; Psychology; Identity (music); Social identity theory; Turkish; Population; Politics; Collective identity; Nationalism; Social group; Self-concept; Sociology; Political science; Law; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.17154798008371555,"score_gpt":0.40508609218348524,"score_spread":0.23353811209976968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135368225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99748397,0.000036389054,0.0000986412,0.00020063782,0.0000065315,0.0000038358385,0.0000041307935,7.234377e-7,0.0021651483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960357,0.000031341868,0.00005523341,0.000049437163,0.000003168908,0.0000060287875,0.0000058953124,9.1359897e-7,0.00024444397],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988397,0.0006410726,0.000028948596,0.00010350097,0.00015332732,0.00023346493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744093,0.0010316313,0.00078451354,0.00013862655,0.00019718595,0.00040716096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013926346,0.00012877618,0.00025254115,0.000634725,0.0024137993,0.0026379933,0.00041434437,0.00069055526,0.0018467393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007419486,0.00015969205,0.00016233577,0.00042627813,0.0025832164,0.0021652747,0.0019964192,0.0011351065,0.00020782364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043723232,0.0003951014,0.3449259,0.00007847214,0.00007170472,0.0007938553,0.6136332,0.00010499151,0.003215617,0.0075904084,0.0007320535,0.0280215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010404419,0.00019057916,0.3152503,0.000043268778,0.000026145011,0.00038770627,0.6765153,0.00027188082,0.0007443101,0.0034076239,0.0031256424,0.000026962161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034377298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038665412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034377298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005820137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045059362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007365048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136304080","doi":"10.1348/014466604x17443","title":"Gender, mood state, and justice preference: Do mood states moderate gender‐based norms of justice?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; University of Guelph; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Mood; Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Task (project management); Preference; Payment","score_opus":0.06996561390418009,"score_gpt":0.37141870011998707,"score_spread":0.30145308621580696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136304080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998767,0.000091115755,0.000119652046,0.000042162952,0.000010043539,0.0000073133765,0.00002029294,0.0000012756902,0.0009411824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994242,0.000042855754,0.0000877336,0.00004096015,0.000010146899,0.0000075850494,0.000021546268,0.0000016901693,0.00036339296],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953914,0.0002143347,0.000024126823,0.00007854964,0.000081926075,0.00006201326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708146,0.0010689447,0.0009843842,0.0002471686,0.00014825103,0.00046979188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011206297,0.00017355903,0.00028536908,0.00029496386,0.00032182198,0.0008642389,0.0001502589,0.00038336907,0.0027078243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047901566,0.00017795389,0.00015243658,0.00016691312,0.00051885855,0.00030132453,0.0004054889,0.00036464672,0.00035548673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00611237,0.0019037061,0.90115446,0.000115009694,0.000279595,0.00024651524,0.0050688796,0.0002044839,0.036894727,0.0007281308,0.000572432,0.04671972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003073512,0.0005086361,0.9975975,0.0000073735164,0.000025635181,0.00006049424,0.00046815968,0.00016879395,0.0005388734,0.00032002703,0.00026478013,0.000008987062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008091303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023818484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027078243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013487709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015794222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009058595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136911333","doi":"10.1348/014466607x216124","title":"Identity formation in multiparty negotiations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Superordinate goals; Negotiation; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Identity negotiation; Identity formation; Social identity theory; Social group; Self-concept; Sociology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04203200224984785,"score_gpt":0.4032391685110482,"score_spread":0.3612071662612003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136911333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6461483,0.00040637082,0.23838395,0.0015426547,0.000082227416,0.00019864916,0.000033903674,0.00013236837,0.11307151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881611,0.00006164093,0.010164854,0.000033788914,0.000010161828,0.00005308133,0.000012572164,0.000010813084,0.0014919831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927786,0.0050657075,0.0001490678,0.00052598224,0.0010410119,0.00043955905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98864704,0.0076720812,0.0014809443,0.0011346269,0.00054635224,0.0005189118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048016817,0.00032789362,0.00035221878,0.00066211005,0.0024879125,0.0035450074,0.0010131762,0.0010664028,0.0048524225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017732104,0.00033258492,0.0006117684,0.0005167402,0.0036290386,0.0042148395,0.0046822513,0.0016831326,0.0006841407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033815985,0.00041834218,0.018880587,0.00019119139,0.00007045716,0.0007856066,0.03727255,0.019539768,0.005646656,0.8395019,0.00063086784,0.076723896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009366724,0.00029668192,0.017297534,0.00009158736,0.000074215626,0.0003882075,0.008819941,0.09211349,0.0067798183,0.86367875,0.010282057,0.000084004256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007144357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046402923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048524225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011057451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010713026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025393963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137534912","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02010.x","title":"A dark side to self‐forgiveness: Forgiving the self and its association with chronic unhealthy behaviour","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Forgiveness; Psychology; Contemplation; Extant taxon; Social psychology; Association (psychology); Self; Experiential avoidance; Psychotherapist; Anxiety; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.021434276230841272,"score_gpt":0.312166892291398,"score_spread":0.2907326160605567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137534912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942472,0.003425951,0.00012409054,0.0013395736,0.000026039237,0.0000043393347,0.000028494618,9.950655e-7,0.0008033775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887246,0.0007601905,0.00007666731,0.00010522591,0.00003897133,0.0000028536883,0.000012491316,5.68531e-7,0.00013053518],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943095,0.00034564876,0.00004080365,0.00005410634,0.000067982444,0.00006046519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947978,0.0028642877,0.0012838383,0.00026229254,0.00017686606,0.0006149012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002140506,0.00022623432,0.00029691236,0.001015021,0.0004292492,0.0008482448,0.00042814377,0.0011549703,0.0024360837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075723194,0.00014193781,0.00027067726,0.00079187966,0.0020716675,0.0010269313,0.0009172304,0.0011594208,0.00011909806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022994025,0.0001396596,0.9792194,0.00008219409,0.00011114361,0.0002812267,0.0024946798,0.000058040278,0.00028442315,0.0010133894,0.00019096889,0.015895054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004360154,0.00017838967,0.9950847,0.00009768676,0.000035736677,0.0005821603,0.0021927035,0.00014059732,0.00004976113,0.0013420912,0.00028149155,0.000010160795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023997985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030691614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024360837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026310535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034506596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011320233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145845235","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12113","title":"Marginal and happy? The need for uniqueness predicts the adjustment of marginal immigrants","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Immigration; Uniqueness; Happiness; Psychology; Life satisfaction; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.04948004327802132,"score_gpt":0.3535191696125585,"score_spread":0.3040391263345372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145845235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993869,0.000060579634,0.000017027764,0.000090073685,0.000005475986,0.0000017359309,0.000012390537,5.604843e-7,0.00042519465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99977523,0.000044461525,0.000017908884,0.00003094183,0.0000035554554,0.0000017268846,0.000015545358,4.5286595e-7,0.00011006717],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997125,0.00010024905,0.000023431574,0.000028184792,0.00004778532,0.00008775222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820626,0.0002709206,0.0006689283,0.000087361506,0.00016417536,0.0006024042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006368522,0.00013511768,0.00026070245,0.0004313656,0.0007158796,0.0011346618,0.00018063738,0.0004030214,0.0029375344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043993965,0.00014547088,0.00027819537,0.0002807131,0.00076264486,0.0004611711,0.00088306225,0.00076209597,0.00026144995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007921014,0.00008908613,0.9922879,0.000014044604,0.000034281984,0.000078282304,0.0026581471,0.000029341507,0.00024913158,0.00014302575,0.0002247113,0.004112812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034993038,0.00007759818,0.991134,0.000016263475,0.000015337979,0.000111470814,0.007962864,0.00010182691,0.0000651156,0.00015770628,0.0003475665,0.000006727848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046437127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068916413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046437127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002040558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002950353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009827018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147786894","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12049","title":"Perceived control qualifies the effects of threat on prejudice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Psychology; Social psychology; Control (management); Perceived control","score_opus":0.01652307867466986,"score_gpt":0.34648343055294106,"score_spread":0.3299603518782712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147786894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97755,0.00038396628,0.0006215851,0.00016921567,0.000027715792,0.000029328565,0.000063847525,0.00000856928,0.021145683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994603,0.000069275215,0.000106733125,0.000029679195,0.0000106436055,0.000006368341,0.00002930831,0.0000027130209,0.0002849609],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884015,0.0004016919,0.00007866624,0.00011139039,0.0003647672,0.00020341715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921749,0.0026872505,0.0022702499,0.00076188805,0.0006204121,0.0014853022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010982387,0.00035309407,0.0002921163,0.0008157118,0.0005304739,0.0011656354,0.00016470211,0.00047358498,0.004397173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006809234,0.00015836312,0.00035266415,0.00033928157,0.0014734203,0.0005177381,0.001084294,0.0009160998,0.00023128539],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015632921,0.0012657233,0.8831974,0.00031422565,0.00044356426,0.0004678159,0.006546936,0.0006067177,0.02672392,0.007281158,0.0006551355,0.07093415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000131864645,0.00039180616,0.9955173,0.000034902405,0.000037292855,0.00018097488,0.0006968768,0.00019411104,0.0009013901,0.001380706,0.00063354004,0.00001802156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010554544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001483204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004397173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032639844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021480968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014710069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159527431","doi":"10.1348/014466607x231109","title":"Interracial prison contact: The pros for (socially dominant) cons","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Social dominance orientation; Psychology; Empathy; Social psychology; Prison; Moderation; Social contact; Ingroups and outgroups; Contact hypothesis; Prejudice (legal term); Developmental psychology; Authoritarianism; Criminology","score_opus":0.0388817183687032,"score_gpt":0.41432227766781193,"score_spread":0.37544055929910874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159527431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920127,0.00014770895,0.00007423108,0.0003667971,0.000009586197,0.0000027401654,0.00000896775,0.0000015257398,0.007375713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99911994,0.000056079327,0.000053776574,0.00004726746,0.000004668446,0.000002810378,0.0000046344494,0.0000012647353,0.00070962915],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992624,0.0004027741,0.000018424407,0.000054037097,0.00013657643,0.0001257474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978223,0.0005120556,0.00080128375,0.00013130641,0.00016099878,0.0005720561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007891949,0.00019013719,0.00015658351,0.0003185582,0.0020366963,0.001313954,0.00021713579,0.000459765,0.0043204604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031649831,0.000114392584,0.00011274199,0.00016525284,0.0013105059,0.0005744299,0.0018198271,0.000744738,0.00022390898],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017436034,0.00062143063,0.6981016,0.00026970543,0.00010954382,0.002475215,0.15514983,0.0000790741,0.021714287,0.00946696,0.0026611534,0.10760763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012744079,0.00025521748,0.91232973,0.00006871319,0.0000336991,0.0009396967,0.08030607,0.000099628465,0.00061842415,0.0009588558,0.0043619922,0.000015325671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037711707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01481154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043204604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053977355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043051667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014453411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161619182","doi":"10.1348/014466605x43777","title":"A social representation is not a quiet thing: Exploring the critical potential of social representations theory","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social Representations and Identity","field":"Psychology","cited_by":499,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Trent University; Nottingham Trent University","keywords":"Reification (Marxism); Epistemology; Ideology; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Social theory; Social identity theory; Social representation; Social psychology; Representation (politics); Critical theory; Identity (music); Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Social group; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.07980273120818035,"score_gpt":0.4335572963355984,"score_spread":0.3537545651274181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161619182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18457165,0.053620283,0.13689482,0.21969709,0.0020926876,0.00019246593,0.000082806044,0.00009799936,0.40275016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807616,0.0054470384,0.008431888,0.0018922158,0.00049804326,0.00012863189,0.000017478185,0.000044763226,0.0027782223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809887,0.016497256,0.00017889004,0.0005175126,0.0010420716,0.00077553117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9670552,0.029594509,0.001029812,0.00078132964,0.00090978673,0.00062941667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02206995,0.00088256435,0.0008691418,0.0059802304,0.009085119,0.01457431,0.002418691,0.0043837847,0.0025900677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017231597,0.00043304946,0.0007472887,0.0035783926,0.0914616,0.019868508,0.008286843,0.0069423392,0.00030936542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054318057,0.000009094984,0.0001140667,0.000034068627,0.0000033868669,0.00007084454,0.024070932,0.0001394567,0.000028237797,0.97296053,0.0005082852,0.0020557372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008648032,0.0000106447,0.00015015005,0.00014066482,0.0000035520097,0.00006375549,0.023231367,0.00066074595,0.000068684596,0.9620994,0.013554382,0.000007937583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032719355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003002717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02206995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010502493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040512006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11671841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171923797","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02073.x","title":"Are we all in this together? Co‐victimization, inclusive social identity and collective action in solidarity with the disadvantaged","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Collective action; Social psychology; Social identity theory; Solidarity; Disadvantaged; Salience (neuroscience); Collective identity; Psychology; Identity (music); Social identity approach; Injustice; Social group; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.0896284296302085,"score_gpt":0.4196992188557618,"score_spread":0.3300707892255533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171923797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94372106,0.0024976155,0.0011911088,0.03636011,0.00030561394,0.00001349079,0.000021977654,0.000012488441,0.01587647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99602723,0.00088503485,0.00033354122,0.0015574155,0.000049994047,0.000008209703,0.000008780102,0.000005041488,0.001124825],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741334,0.0014503553,0.00004986692,0.00027259917,0.00030125733,0.00051261927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651897,0.0008192502,0.0009994074,0.00031200086,0.00026580424,0.0010844579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002889599,0.0002072901,0.00049188803,0.00058486284,0.0036339436,0.0037130076,0.00051186694,0.0017428717,0.0041337106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068139373,0.00024141757,0.0003912911,0.0004016405,0.011674042,0.0049870396,0.0037032852,0.0024403366,0.00043694084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042108138,0.0011747638,0.3817053,0.00039781636,0.00046610463,0.002483216,0.38228893,0.00029980624,0.005219811,0.058835786,0.0108377775,0.15586966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004129882,0.0005234332,0.3525326,0.00060696446,0.0001892971,0.0018376934,0.5318352,0.0003910886,0.0011032809,0.05979828,0.051008206,0.0001327065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045876554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075148474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045876554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008112063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010894233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015281856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2418794081","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12145","title":"Social identity change in response to discrimination","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Social identity theory; Identity (music); Identity change; Social group; Feeling; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.08499979768165969,"score_gpt":0.45371554242911655,"score_spread":0.36871574474745683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2418794081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993123,0.000023347751,0.000023967803,0.000033036446,0.0000039100028,0.000003960547,0.000004237902,5.559257e-7,0.00059463055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99968064,0.000017101862,0.000032951375,0.000025692925,0.0000029432863,0.000003447909,0.000009350329,3.2294045e-7,0.00022753933],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995579,0.00015071324,0.000011866458,0.00003973267,0.0001324632,0.00010724404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998473,0.00034988558,0.0005723615,0.00009539913,0.00017805338,0.00033130578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051929767,0.00012445454,0.00017079312,0.00027792444,0.0008211781,0.00067686907,0.00016033332,0.0003634085,0.001643677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029281946,0.000066116925,0.0001429925,0.00016056786,0.00063100737,0.00019348049,0.0007165559,0.00066092727,0.000098218465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014449408,0.0015343581,0.8749676,0.0001080253,0.00007036705,0.0010772084,0.032554526,0.00026271975,0.04652681,0.0005916722,0.00040063454,0.04046114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006628573,0.000200887,0.99029505,0.000007917589,0.000005287385,0.000093830706,0.007862832,0.000109616274,0.0008780147,0.000110116474,0.00042314033,0.000006744171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009080621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01649519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009080621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086395885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000414748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018055499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517560021","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12155","title":"Social Identity Mapping: A procedure for visual representation and assessment of subjective multiple group memberships","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Mental Health Research Topics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Psychology; Social identity theory; Social psychology; Social identity approach; Social group; Social representation","score_opus":0.15277335975933412,"score_gpt":0.5282541740271182,"score_spread":0.375480814267784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517560021","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050566413,0.00020495661,0.9316722,0.00021983287,0.00017403865,0.0012293867,0.0010346394,0.0029284004,0.011970005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13451903,0.00017544671,0.8592723,0.0000773599,0.000043421136,0.0024014926,0.00053300324,0.000456649,0.0025214513],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996014,0.0025000044,0.00024956366,0.00036665105,0.00073841866,0.00013134649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918296,0.0044590416,0.00068439654,0.001678935,0.0010739195,0.0002741973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067948312,0.0010289307,0.0005198873,0.0061905016,0.0008800409,0.0018783102,0.0011341133,0.00069586386,0.0115742525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020078665,0.0004935862,0.0008410456,0.003028533,0.0013804862,0.0024969096,0.003405997,0.0012348554,0.0018577636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009473787,0.0002733902,0.01628754,0.00083366863,0.00013644772,0.0002643335,0.013420462,0.0036590442,0.04273619,0.055443563,0.0127541805,0.85324377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045736105,0.0024634055,0.13327569,0.0009423155,0.00031780574,0.004478163,0.027940487,0.1903022,0.12882221,0.21301554,0.29690766,0.001077188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011303686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001846438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0115742525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049913407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009019421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038719714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585972597","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12186","title":"Using the SIRDE model of social change to examine the vote of Scottish teenagers in the 2014 independence referendum","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Relative deprivation; Social psychology; Voting; Psychology; Independence (probability theory); Social identity theory; Identity (music); Collective identity; Politics; Social group; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.22355881820499335,"score_gpt":0.44181754944474994,"score_spread":0.2182587312397566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585972597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99229866,0.000085597945,0.0029150383,0.000611556,0.000033677836,0.00009450175,0.0002994051,0.000014251718,0.003647259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99687576,0.000064332264,0.0013730556,0.000050972747,0.000008403596,0.00011829534,0.00034069252,0.0000024766944,0.0011658836],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826163,0.0010026842,0.00008115792,0.00021628948,0.0002048057,0.00023347518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967619,0.0018712513,0.00060225494,0.0002089909,0.00031253084,0.00024313152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030170642,0.00040753718,0.00044366505,0.0011446658,0.000751446,0.0017148514,0.0010478531,0.00067963917,0.0050197206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006995377,0.00024541767,0.0014261996,0.0010489153,0.0009825643,0.0009513697,0.0013173887,0.0013012183,0.0004964224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029631896,0.0013295618,0.9319665,0.00008372772,0.00043638225,0.00035233644,0.010815589,0.010262063,0.00040889913,0.016235733,0.0011814258,0.02663144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014393317,0.0010666811,0.84102863,0.000104533814,0.00026499684,0.00021182405,0.013858257,0.12529767,0.00033424253,0.010175062,0.007433175,0.00008096658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0576637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06529905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0576637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024461523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013052728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11465615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750995011","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12216","title":"Low relational mobility leads to greater motivation to understand enemies but not friends and acquaintances","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07516280015799068,"score_gpt":0.3800349976963374,"score_spread":0.3048721975383467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750995011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991898,0.000031990214,0.00005019868,0.000037953832,0.0000016070471,0.000002082305,0.0000088701045,0.0000015930758,0.0006760004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996038,0.000035727247,0.00009605771,0.000011693734,0.000002049882,0.000002813445,0.000020066414,0.0000011845989,0.00022649352],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996364,0.00012104888,0.00002110235,0.00007790537,0.0000758531,0.00006765135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968514,0.00072784204,0.0015934734,0.00017749182,0.00012359461,0.0005262295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005628201,0.00026381118,0.00017784804,0.00041804023,0.00052183645,0.0008647368,0.00017774107,0.0003144116,0.004210119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030111563,0.00016542028,0.00032969227,0.00022348434,0.000570135,0.0003364134,0.0007190237,0.0005502003,0.00016016142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003959953,0.0005934067,0.9668705,0.00007417177,0.00023194078,0.0004915621,0.0047456254,0.000073824696,0.011194953,0.0005522066,0.00025633944,0.014519538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053144754,0.00009988604,0.99767154,0.000009261134,0.000029984221,0.00014884396,0.0012907299,0.00008711293,0.00034528022,0.00014082939,0.00016666458,0.000004501407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003468816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005521962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004210119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003259466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021914368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01408422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766570108","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12226","title":"Unforgiveness: Refining theory and measurement of an understudied construct","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Rumination; Conceptualization; Discriminant validity; Interpersonal communication; Construct (python library); Construct validity; Scale (ratio); Forgiveness; Social psychology; Cognition; Convergent validity; Reliability (semiconductor); Developmental psychology; Psychometrics","score_opus":0.06197690705960791,"score_gpt":0.38106080284571275,"score_spread":0.31908389578610485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766570108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89406836,0.013239089,0.06671415,0.0038959654,0.000344251,0.00049157225,0.00018300425,0.00008668118,0.020977054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97783434,0.0033398087,0.017687995,0.00032590338,0.00009106284,0.00023523197,0.000098383935,0.000014136292,0.00037318462],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922903,0.004204904,0.0007563721,0.0007122515,0.0017342177,0.00030191432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97220933,0.016375378,0.0034036809,0.0028008248,0.0044793435,0.00073141226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015825631,0.0006062031,0.00067367667,0.004539367,0.0011908613,0.0027899172,0.0012725063,0.000870783,0.00094628066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044744153,0.00026582193,0.0004684616,0.0023504773,0.005468891,0.005258522,0.0023458614,0.0018561188,0.00016412002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011959809,0.00036713493,0.3531919,0.0013072297,0.00014447224,0.00033052338,0.058451563,0.0005903736,0.0027496573,0.054663964,0.0012877211,0.52679586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042428026,0.0013143307,0.74023825,0.0058274213,0.00022632282,0.0027374215,0.09667055,0.0070204814,0.0033886079,0.10502682,0.03721155,0.00029577603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052501927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005498917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015825631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002681404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028495898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083694935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785019768","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12243","title":"Giving in when feeling less good: Procrastination, action control, and social temptations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Procrastination; Psychology; Social psychology; Feeling; Affect (linguistics); Mood; Mediation; Personality; Context (archaeology); Experience sampling method; Trait; Developmental psychology; Moderated mediation","score_opus":0.044477541533729695,"score_gpt":0.36820881890640317,"score_spread":0.3237312773726735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785019768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979286,0.0005635618,0.00022147738,0.00018634478,0.000004455321,0.00000396238,0.0000060562375,0.0000020820164,0.0010833314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950254,0.0001807095,0.00011046793,0.000029762961,0.000005396908,0.0000032723353,0.000007913032,0.0000012580881,0.00015872193],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993063,0.00034620948,0.0000377894,0.00009842356,0.0001256882,0.0000855888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943414,0.0024673878,0.0020148193,0.00036476634,0.00028294607,0.0005286199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018918089,0.00022184094,0.00026012814,0.0007134941,0.00040748628,0.0017652005,0.00026348338,0.00044828825,0.0013702771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065831384,0.00020329184,0.00032011635,0.00044360082,0.001354755,0.00064133113,0.00076148764,0.0011343025,0.00007504863],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031231396,0.000520532,0.94528174,0.000108238855,0.0001895601,0.0003512286,0.010371893,0.00018221751,0.0023576124,0.0014502598,0.00012846109,0.038745884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003378388,0.00008428173,0.9968021,0.000022353508,0.000037213857,0.0001579862,0.0016133914,0.00018943001,0.00021034625,0.0006341209,0.00023731832,0.000007985301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002301737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038924168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002301737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037398882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039871142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010004938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793293308","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12239","title":"How do passion for video games and needs frustration explain time spent gaming?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Passion; Psychology; Autonomy; Social psychology; Video game; Frustration; Competence (human resources); Association (psychology); Self-determination theory; Multimedia; Computer science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.026240088090913945,"score_gpt":0.3288226739163144,"score_spread":0.3025825858254005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793293308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99744666,0.0003458181,0.00020565861,0.00026068167,0.0000136708095,0.000013283517,0.000060921066,0.000004872056,0.0016484808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935406,0.0001194162,0.00014522053,0.00002832145,0.000007804705,0.000012648126,0.0000681623,0.0000026038408,0.00026173246],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993293,0.00026563165,0.000058239675,0.00009593623,0.000110234636,0.0001407131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99232554,0.003901442,0.0018412857,0.00030386908,0.00022955865,0.0013982378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011346412,0.0003722773,0.00047149314,0.001204926,0.0005252655,0.0022205345,0.0008867101,0.001101791,0.0056858747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011811512,0.00030295202,0.001030784,0.0006234795,0.0011694222,0.0009086529,0.0010803337,0.0011734884,0.000439352],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008951534,0.00027131135,0.9909326,0.000039473143,0.00014989013,0.00008946209,0.0017227249,0.00021673118,0.00013207663,0.000600791,0.000158126,0.005597322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071188606,0.00009396382,0.9950735,0.000041905758,0.000047348516,0.00011916762,0.0020303978,0.0013590815,0.000036343416,0.00077902636,0.00040002793,0.000012002801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0116564715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012161356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0116564715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091236894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076943886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023177207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794335591","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12245","title":"‘I'm happy to own my implicit biases’: Public encounters with the implicit association test","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Implicit-association test; Implicit attitude; Psychology; Prejudice (legal term); Social psychology; Implicit bias; Test (biology); Association (psychology); Cognitive bias; In-group favoritism; Social group; Cognition; Social identity theory","score_opus":0.03166434290622567,"score_gpt":0.3608443752534918,"score_spread":0.3291800323472661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794335591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9095006,0.001891779,0.0025428524,0.06477475,0.0008683436,0.00006287632,0.000041778265,0.000089649184,0.02022729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98700964,0.00076349685,0.0009333186,0.008770322,0.00040562163,0.000035949914,0.00002514663,0.00005548239,0.0020010392],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9543798,0.036890894,0.0012657699,0.0010836709,0.0042712507,0.0021084764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90215755,0.073881686,0.014436535,0.0034824712,0.0036118075,0.0024300464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03743904,0.00068609463,0.0010555051,0.001274061,0.012021467,0.008431658,0.0011668263,0.0077036764,0.0031210154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12132771,0.0008696913,0.00060406537,0.0011038976,0.012984392,0.009295492,0.008223391,0.014762781,0.0012285028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002984441,0.00026681117,0.020150032,0.00016901683,0.000050371087,0.0038210389,0.92636913,0.000083715444,0.002296557,0.0069687236,0.00922329,0.03030286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060765156,0.0005270995,0.017306926,0.00066948443,0.00009849604,0.008295718,0.8720794,0.0012869244,0.0037150385,0.0107036475,0.0850511,0.00020548826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002791309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002897869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03743904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031476186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014666058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19799888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890406325","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12279","title":"The transformative and informative nature of elections: Representation, schism, and exit","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Identity (music); Democracy; Schism; Perception; Social psychology; Political science; Transformative learning; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Politics; Psychology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.017866985201010554,"score_gpt":0.3961342008996192,"score_spread":0.37826721569860866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890406325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9530194,0.00007731045,0.0015211792,0.00077662454,0.000020092994,0.000013988776,0.000013406869,0.000009173739,0.04454883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905854,0.000014411176,0.0001041502,0.0000297896,0.0000064140386,0.00000340259,0.00000807845,0.0000030489425,0.000772236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787617,0.0012424358,0.00004289986,0.00015050602,0.000268939,0.0004190411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957164,0.0019105994,0.0010524278,0.00037237103,0.00036159914,0.00058663025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023964788,0.00012024237,0.00017003673,0.000694019,0.0018077546,0.0031624928,0.00032857864,0.00044647022,0.005137656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011348064,0.00012534349,0.00018554357,0.0003649947,0.0040532695,0.0021916034,0.0020516475,0.0013666196,0.00038600893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021471886,0.0009859985,0.28355923,0.0001958685,0.000077980534,0.0005829674,0.21893108,0.0019325749,0.010723652,0.30400646,0.0033752501,0.17348179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009050178,0.00075399963,0.6633325,0.00017747887,0.0000486698,0.00050750736,0.15370847,0.00599881,0.0030735282,0.14301732,0.029170481,0.00012060053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021725274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004087064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005137656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011366517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077502424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017187178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891617466","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12278","title":"System justification: Experimental evidence, its contextual nature, and implications for social change","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"System justification; Status quo; Ignorance; Legitimacy; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Extant taxon; Status quo bias; Positive economics; Resistance (ecology); Social influence; Political science; Law; Politics; Ideology; Economics","score_opus":0.15534967412786901,"score_gpt":0.48083132554335734,"score_spread":0.32548165141548835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891617466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6137311,0.0531588,0.06727945,0.047604788,0.0017416162,0.0012631316,0.00066782837,0.00022043499,0.21433285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799962,0.007926167,0.008006375,0.0019527911,0.000305048,0.00050000794,0.00013989268,0.00004057609,0.0011328914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.97536,0.017218102,0.0010293176,0.0023459007,0.0034617104,0.0005849313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.687247,0.26995057,0.018248573,0.016592521,0.006454662,0.0015067253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03393063,0.000780755,0.00088719313,0.0030040517,0.0020732286,0.0035704682,0.0024670311,0.0030258507,0.016281722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10986632,0.00045625152,0.00085146533,0.003173093,0.019709848,0.007242268,0.0041035246,0.0030873986,0.00078025815],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001397949,0.0034422614,0.049069453,0.0076754843,0.00087922224,0.00040172,0.014381182,0.00315141,0.00430935,0.7385266,0.004551418,0.17221397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086566457,0.0035877344,0.08929398,0.0045648497,0.0008088534,0.00053136464,0.017297808,0.006470701,0.008626162,0.8124179,0.055303432,0.00023153453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018786615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023503888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03393063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004083698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027147995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17944449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892346574","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12273","title":"Rethinking current models in social psychology: A Bayesian framework to understand dramatic social change","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Social psychology; Psychology; Social change; Normative; Probabilistic logic; Bayesian probability; Pace; Sociology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.27072131209155126,"score_gpt":0.4701196072151156,"score_spread":0.19939829512356433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892346574","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016376464,0.0029598947,0.95686746,0.015193473,0.00018623253,0.00008116367,0.00022933134,0.00011776517,0.00798823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63826495,0.005732216,0.34747273,0.002744703,0.00090637075,0.0005631751,0.00035953964,0.00014343466,0.0038128076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901163,0.0075407512,0.0002590491,0.0009318531,0.0008279304,0.0003240502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94381917,0.050306566,0.002106869,0.0014138672,0.0014716375,0.0008818919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020615198,0.0012040737,0.0019919274,0.0038598545,0.0019387881,0.0051355236,0.004397133,0.0033906228,0.004796981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05415436,0.0011036011,0.0019154313,0.00310686,0.008708046,0.011441449,0.0027272904,0.0077761784,0.0006529736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047062644,0.000076683784,0.0023907085,0.00015566876,0.00013234337,0.000102547914,0.0012228043,0.10353517,0.00013746737,0.8697057,0.0020945827,0.020399269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010440853,0.000014784805,0.00048502092,0.00004535957,0.000017864248,0.000029134548,0.00014910493,0.11239239,0.000025556426,0.8845339,0.0022733621,0.000023197028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023032801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023373067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023032801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006376295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003072002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10902494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899678614","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12291","title":"Perceiving time through group‐based glasses: Collective temporal orientation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Future orientation; Orientation (vector space); Perspective (graphical); Social cognition; Cognition; Focus group; Developmental psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.058025297055412796,"score_gpt":0.4203665206903367,"score_spread":0.3623412236349239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899678614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938319,0.0001817016,0.0019383251,0.00008456447,0.00001337744,0.000010245196,0.00003289383,0.0000050095887,0.0039020465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895203,0.00010125332,0.00059243117,0.000033866196,0.000006942847,0.000009560174,0.000030452307,0.0000031511795,0.0002702935],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962926,0.00015654428,0.000020127873,0.0000629066,0.000094531475,0.000036660495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974975,0.00074735034,0.0011089033,0.00021637841,0.00018526122,0.00024468312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096223823,0.00023455074,0.00016354858,0.0005030358,0.00038788136,0.001578773,0.0001727917,0.00043022336,0.0014871052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003941187,0.00014387851,0.0002444765,0.00032589224,0.00089897605,0.0012017259,0.0010810533,0.00055914064,0.00012972283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012679116,0.00035423413,0.70790035,0.00030707673,0.00031097358,0.00047766062,0.16274863,0.0006518377,0.051196247,0.0060736784,0.0008877665,0.06782353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023392919,0.00043891498,0.93790674,0.0000695178,0.00008968911,0.00042643418,0.050567396,0.00083130895,0.002355527,0.003924055,0.003298314,0.00006875811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014357037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025939075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001578773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034425472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018020575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0050888658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901101079","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12294","title":"Social psychological research on prejudice as collective action supporting emergent ingroup members","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian National University; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Ingroups and outgroups; Prejudice (legal term); Outgroup; Social psychology; Psychology; Mainstream; Conversation; Collective action; Group conflict; Social group; Social identity theory; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.2616414378223606,"score_gpt":0.573023587688977,"score_spread":0.3113821498666164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901101079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8847519,0.005979332,0.011276745,0.018524442,0.00047983738,0.000035743044,0.00006061113,0.000031956304,0.07885943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961552,0.0011179876,0.0013237429,0.0005741221,0.000086136555,0.000017027873,0.000014985,0.000006428407,0.0007044083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99512607,0.0030293528,0.00014392484,0.00056691235,0.0007977057,0.0003361626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779603,0.0109421,0.005403215,0.0027193048,0.0016234629,0.0013515317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009739668,0.00025061457,0.00034427032,0.0020308653,0.0021358714,0.004142731,0.0006917633,0.0011074207,0.0018855929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017148139,0.00013298892,0.00033953204,0.0016323988,0.01077996,0.0044755,0.0024778282,0.0021789966,0.0001787351],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002100086,0.0005124832,0.27255806,0.0009630418,0.00027385989,0.00047520324,0.18184309,0.0014696177,0.0071333586,0.33836737,0.0029399614,0.19325395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026636073,0.00042173362,0.45337594,0.0011816858,0.00018702228,0.0007429668,0.13133441,0.0019051563,0.002587442,0.36869842,0.0394207,0.00011787577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020103718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037011553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009739668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017675573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015087395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051508904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901678059","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12303","title":"Managing a moral identity in debt advice conversations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Debt; Conversation; Negotiation; Social psychology; Psychology; Public relations; Business; Political science; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.06536381299804125,"score_gpt":0.4670548926480924,"score_spread":0.40169107965005113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901678059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96840477,0.00047162097,0.0029206483,0.0017572044,0.000050109345,0.00012378868,0.000023344826,0.000028672841,0.02621989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959055,0.00022448767,0.0014209689,0.00030133192,0.000014711138,0.00008119549,0.000013239272,0.00001639472,0.002022145],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9777895,0.017194483,0.00056394783,0.0006821888,0.002287086,0.0014827767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9758489,0.01621615,0.0037364836,0.0008878499,0.001576763,0.0017338217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012085124,0.0003679791,0.000584867,0.0016267154,0.014028905,0.009194845,0.0013650508,0.0024174638,0.0039651035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033740833,0.00050515024,0.00031323338,0.0012016526,0.009617428,0.005778967,0.010602788,0.002853447,0.00056425185],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004573835,0.00005648509,0.004717782,0.00008093253,0.0000044722624,0.0002991408,0.9825739,0.00002462824,0.0006258322,0.002725648,0.00032895544,0.008516452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009632682,0.000045846926,0.009930807,0.00018213208,0.000008787904,0.0003981983,0.96988934,0.00021845078,0.0005376409,0.0032358605,0.015519397,0.000023921652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005851891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010186092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014028905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051671504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004529453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06391299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967632537","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12338","title":"What really helps? Divergent implications of talking to someone with an empathic mindset versus similar experience for shame and self‐evaluation in the wake of an embarrassing event","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Mindset; Empathy; Feeling; Social psychology; Empathic concern; Perception; Task (project management); Surprise; Shame; Perspective-taking; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.06923283522717409,"score_gpt":0.427128993512186,"score_spread":0.35789615828501187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967632537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99890137,0.00003869101,0.000069765534,0.00010718914,0.0000085112515,0.0000060081084,0.0000039394135,0.0000016573841,0.00086294115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99942917,0.000053156422,0.00020765446,0.00006960524,0.000005197888,0.00001347844,0.0000058917485,0.0000023978573,0.00021341025],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928254,0.00043328802,0.00001881525,0.00006348591,0.000107953005,0.00009398362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974189,0.0013909473,0.0003361811,0.000108096276,0.000095101954,0.00065082737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013673753,0.00017637949,0.00019818799,0.0001939994,0.00054934144,0.0008463427,0.0002149451,0.0005440294,0.0017589034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067386134,0.00016372974,0.00025514018,0.000072480485,0.0010337736,0.0006314643,0.00076511945,0.0008963208,0.00012543556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02206765,0.01032131,0.25270465,0.001338497,0.0007614654,0.0032797498,0.17051993,0.0011674173,0.35362455,0.0048324806,0.0016118473,0.17777047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044554038,0.008970883,0.89554936,0.00014424135,0.00032276238,0.0008134297,0.076694824,0.0009944305,0.01129922,0.0025639217,0.002116773,0.000084661384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039966774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097219605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0017589034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024016452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028867688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007231474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975177052","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12342","title":"Empathy choice in physicians and non‐physicians","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Empathy; Psychology; Trait; Cognition; Perspective-taking; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.013501618695427162,"score_gpt":0.3400529504579027,"score_spread":0.3265513317624755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975177052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995802,0.00003435211,0.000024543275,0.000042756543,0.0000021393282,0.0000034414754,0.0000049459463,2.8003143e-7,0.0003074862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957484,0.00003158958,0.00003913995,0.000042448995,0.000002927947,0.000005528676,0.000009670527,3.0647465e-7,0.00029353536],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987295,0.0005665111,0.00009088211,0.000143928,0.00027000456,0.00019918555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99383026,0.0030176812,0.0016068264,0.00016284727,0.00035295982,0.0010294003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014856127,0.00011085488,0.00022463342,0.0005137924,0.0004496788,0.0007875744,0.000147224,0.00059688976,0.0028166668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014074462,0.00014364095,0.00018073508,0.00022465829,0.0007027907,0.00048597436,0.00086658855,0.00048225635,0.0002827513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0063107084,0.0018384737,0.92067766,0.00009885721,0.00011559077,0.001251245,0.026117146,0.00046874554,0.01511712,0.0012830356,0.0006012842,0.026120154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001035679,0.0016587268,0.986193,0.000025303503,0.000018916904,0.00095185154,0.007831674,0.00054068014,0.0011079328,0.0005942095,0.0009522233,0.00002184319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010299354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018554325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028166668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003894106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041223716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0094227195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979571174","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12340","title":"Participating in a new group and the identification processes: The quest for a positive social identity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Basketball; Social psychology; Identity (music); Social identity theory; Value (mathematics); Identification (biology); Group identification; Collective identity; Social group; Immigration; Group (periodic table); Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.03432984393506476,"score_gpt":0.40482083095362265,"score_spread":0.37049098701855787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979571174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948147,0.000046905876,0.000107596796,0.00017817348,0.0000052142495,0.0000060637503,0.000003567276,7.476797e-7,0.004837054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903,0.000033522683,0.00012627163,0.000029455294,0.0000018411156,0.0000042221754,0.00000555824,8.9501987e-7,0.0007682231],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898976,0.0005687396,0.000016149419,0.000081152546,0.00018409557,0.0001600051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981146,0.0005349554,0.000481268,0.00010346826,0.0001953451,0.0005703751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018556992,0.00023048233,0.00016298845,0.0005831784,0.0036993749,0.00232385,0.00031046278,0.0006028449,0.0032651532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031968367,0.00012291707,0.0001440214,0.00028466637,0.0032232918,0.0010007976,0.0018836689,0.0008521695,0.00021528867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071451813,0.0019108608,0.6062202,0.00014794283,0.00008045124,0.0007711157,0.28844523,0.00030113195,0.0086861905,0.014460034,0.0009003111,0.07736209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025051495,0.000359188,0.77886534,0.00009488172,0.00002446138,0.00021754213,0.21191134,0.00056054664,0.00080996077,0.0032095208,0.0038856547,0.000036495207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043250017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10415788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043250017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026349614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002694364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08599657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990123552","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12355","title":"Mobilizing IDEAS in the Scottish Referendum: Predicting voting intention and well‐being with the Identity‐Deprivation‐Efficacy‐Action‐Subjective well‐being model","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Collective action; Social psychology; Referendum; Relative deprivation; Psychology; Voting; Social identity theory; Collective identity; Social identity approach; Structural equation modeling; Collective efficacy; Politics; Social group; Political science","score_opus":0.031186177391052897,"score_gpt":0.3483719014404853,"score_spread":0.3171857240494324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990123552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995103,0.000006660265,0.00008379748,0.00003873657,0.0000017173396,0.0000040656114,0.000031169195,0.0000012966597,0.0003222485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995759,0.000007059958,0.00011771917,0.000011260282,0.00000205846,0.0000067482715,0.00007715383,5.2871064e-7,0.00020159774],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995377,0.00018782447,0.000030581778,0.00006390076,0.000099186684,0.00008084511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806184,0.00048065823,0.0006824684,0.00020424789,0.00018651439,0.00038422618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022744667,0.00028067568,0.0002289699,0.00044845341,0.00062318606,0.0010145071,0.00034896104,0.00037469933,0.002147974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037752895,0.00015207173,0.0005904239,0.00041116728,0.0005865059,0.00042507277,0.0009603291,0.0007262888,0.00036543637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011230103,0.0002962307,0.9926898,0.00000769372,0.00004209273,0.000057213092,0.0013839703,0.00031688638,0.0002964486,0.00022674142,0.00021118062,0.0043593906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067230885,0.00014026112,0.99674076,0.0000045463976,0.000014703803,0.000015132288,0.0008709011,0.001741142,0.00009434979,0.00011442954,0.00025125322,0.0000056967474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036998257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07010688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036998257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006954346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058823806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07356584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004972017","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12365","title":"We are all in this together: The role of individuals’ social identities in problematic engagement with video games and the internet","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Impact of Technology on Adolescents","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Loneliness; Psychology; The Internet; Context (archaeology); Identification (biology); Social psychology; Social engagement; Internet users; Social identity theory; Developmental psychology; Social group; World Wide Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.034975626376222826,"score_gpt":0.3292593643779855,"score_spread":0.29428373800176266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004972017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99571157,0.00025348275,0.00038522485,0.0009411185,0.000025997037,0.000008035814,0.000017780369,0.0000020586588,0.0026548302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993862,0.00012590579,0.00012654743,0.00009915492,0.000008515715,0.0000054387797,0.000008300658,0.0000011966047,0.00023875662],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913114,0.00041891198,0.000051948246,0.000117932934,0.00012649148,0.00015357317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783945,0.0007315747,0.00061670895,0.00015881853,0.00018214728,0.00047118837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016014408,0.00017545692,0.00022623519,0.00082281156,0.0016386978,0.0025037169,0.00033522293,0.00061254966,0.0025454948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004338014,0.00013992118,0.00024302724,0.00044110656,0.002667468,0.0024593954,0.002028779,0.0009049329,0.00017196381],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111729314,0.00022087328,0.7519689,0.00013641428,0.00010864077,0.0007477061,0.18616219,0.000094123556,0.0019232976,0.007888754,0.000759446,0.049877863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073664673,0.00016936882,0.8444294,0.00011859005,0.0000552473,0.00056282803,0.14419924,0.00024856438,0.00044378123,0.003741947,0.0059911986,0.000032413263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004878859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064637773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004878859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042840117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006984929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009700894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016977417","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12379","title":"The Bullshitting Frequency Scale: Development and psychometric properties","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sincerity; Psychology; Honesty; Scale (ratio); Need for cognition; Cognition; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.06893376235682114,"score_gpt":0.3354935208733679,"score_spread":0.2665597585165468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016977417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9610377,0.0016015383,0.015535326,0.0006180757,0.00016195045,0.005754659,0.0021299804,0.00027864237,0.0128821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9133827,0.0020134337,0.0655304,0.0004258597,0.00019461052,0.009211102,0.0047630365,0.0001519078,0.004326888],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659926,0.0010822392,0.00064884365,0.00017059437,0.0013953368,0.000103789534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848888,0.006243067,0.0030942962,0.0009656139,0.0039478773,0.00086044165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077485056,0.00052541075,0.00054408284,0.0026147768,0.000503219,0.000734175,0.00095301314,0.00093161286,0.0026228228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014388867,0.0004996674,0.0012092711,0.0014546764,0.00063447095,0.0010128982,0.0013216352,0.0016659416,0.000994818],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013512151,0.0027935947,0.7731621,0.00040876438,0.00034888132,0.00024352032,0.0031475096,0.001638166,0.005812593,0.0011849911,0.0049168346,0.20499176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019544408,0.0024397695,0.98333794,0.00012117324,0.00006508111,0.000550354,0.0010235441,0.002302468,0.0013287448,0.0011090733,0.007452531,0.00007377006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015141519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024878345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077485056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045493868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091141113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04097849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111850786","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12431","title":"Tweeting about sexism motivates further activism: A social identity perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Collective action; Social psychology; Social identity theory; Silence; Psychology; Social media; Perspective (graphical); Social activism; Identity (music); Action (physics); Feminism; Mediation; Collective identity; Social movement; Social identity approach; Social group; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05301725731157875,"score_gpt":0.4027459007213018,"score_spread":0.34972864340972304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111850786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86313564,0.0009203548,0.0018512201,0.00842948,0.00012431023,0.000077543074,0.000058565638,0.000015544596,0.12538745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996438,0.00033617145,0.00048399012,0.00032024574,0.00003165119,0.000023666322,0.000010753219,0.0000053606323,0.0023502707],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905103,0.00055738364,0.000014867703,0.000107381806,0.00010631666,0.00016301089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771297,0.0013354381,0.0003835582,0.00008192104,0.00012364566,0.00036239348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014247877,0.00031664938,0.00019484787,0.0009426434,0.0012704137,0.0025031215,0.00040390677,0.00085128366,0.008510116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029744725,0.00020134676,0.00034497274,0.0003539712,0.0023326355,0.0014854479,0.0012866374,0.0010267309,0.00038334168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015243669,0.0070674075,0.30540043,0.0014874944,0.0003653233,0.0025643513,0.20495364,0.0010302786,0.036173724,0.23239176,0.0040697884,0.20297138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002591312,0.0021140226,0.6874485,0.00062609575,0.00035819836,0.0008089426,0.17692022,0.002400725,0.009965672,0.07473699,0.044283267,0.000078274315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017221401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028711667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008510116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001123343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001023726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028469145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117037993","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12436","title":"A multilevel analysis of LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender) rights support across 77 countries: The role of contact and country laws","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Transgender; Psychology; Prejudice (legal term); Social psychology; Homosexuality; Gender studies; Multilevel model; Sociology","score_opus":0.07221736434241792,"score_gpt":0.42855388862185195,"score_spread":0.356336524279434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117037993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979227,0.00008905959,0.0006381069,0.0001678441,0.0000044199487,0.00002828391,0.00055526046,0.000009188309,0.0005850552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99808216,0.00006290953,0.0009988747,0.000022909344,0.0000032000785,0.00006064149,0.0005068132,0.0000064889564,0.00025601458],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863213,0.00070570805,0.00007371052,0.00013437138,0.00015712035,0.00029697496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968881,0.0012512299,0.0005414997,0.00039308777,0.00046491664,0.00046110337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020818184,0.00027667813,0.0005647205,0.0016873545,0.0017160747,0.0011539068,0.00058290025,0.00041578957,0.0033659742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006155313,0.0002505298,0.0018898597,0.00218642,0.00040590504,0.0005529217,0.002473742,0.0012208335,0.00022777429],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016167034,0.00008387011,0.9852711,0.000046916663,0.00068224553,0.0001487014,0.0030129426,0.00063052675,0.00045592716,0.00065446214,0.00062231143,0.008229385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014105554,0.00021703086,0.9854138,0.000067794135,0.00043352495,0.000093228155,0.008395405,0.0040730834,0.00016422846,0.00032617402,0.0007842475,0.000017391229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10465178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12392508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10465178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011755986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001827287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2080853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121610184","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12445","title":"Battling ingroup bias with effective intergroup leadership","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Superordinate goals; In-group favoritism; Psychology; Group conflict; Social psychology; Social identity theory; Identity (music); Ingroups and outgroups; Collective identity; Social group; Political science","score_opus":0.09395246287003203,"score_gpt":0.37402323447710084,"score_spread":0.28007077160706884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121610184","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35503566,0.59865,0.014942431,0.0077501424,0.0012256461,0.0007187653,0.00050725637,0.00014983921,0.02102026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92250425,0.06208885,0.011353678,0.002100019,0.00068114174,0.00038562194,0.00017202132,0.000033659893,0.0006807385],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98845994,0.0070457514,0.001396635,0.000819358,0.0020722365,0.0002060231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753135,0.016214702,0.0058350167,0.0011182124,0.0011002657,0.00041834963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01163636,0.0005032533,0.0008618068,0.0016685923,0.00038788025,0.0015140256,0.00082661124,0.0006481669,0.002781999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026413316,0.00034668137,0.0025083583,0.0016685582,0.0012347085,0.0014708275,0.0009992546,0.0012862191,0.00026941675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017421482,0.0017453346,0.11320173,0.10085992,0.05735425,0.00035370703,0.004863472,0.0012424589,0.0033475526,0.007064898,0.0053641656,0.7028603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040499936,0.0072492966,0.6595511,0.0601281,0.1398243,0.0020407282,0.0037938305,0.0020624378,0.010546547,0.030047247,0.08052919,0.00017719547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012868133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037740257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01163636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005808178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014520336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06153971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128082335","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12447","title":"‘You can’t bullshit a bullshitter’ (or can you?): Bullshitting frequency predicts receptivity to various types of misleading information","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Receptivity; Style (visual arts); Cognition; Cognitive style; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030151087384354062,"score_gpt":0.33900299620453855,"score_spread":0.3088519088201845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128082335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988475,0.00016258661,0.00011092743,0.00014727793,0.000006459516,0.000013255242,0.000034863442,0.0000020974517,0.0006751056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991685,0.00016201222,0.00016187754,0.00008642135,0.0000137445995,0.000010199898,0.00005101213,0.0000023220966,0.00034404913],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986985,0.0005698989,0.0002054583,0.00014095513,0.00027575705,0.00010942549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9531569,0.020403242,0.020680025,0.0023004047,0.001548888,0.0019104885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043815565,0.00022658877,0.00033791902,0.00080545637,0.00050773576,0.0013875331,0.00046787094,0.0013452972,0.0034638054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038536597,0.0003397234,0.0005564354,0.0005236374,0.0009888083,0.0013660796,0.000833411,0.0017098752,0.000517923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042935432,0.00033428296,0.98465204,0.00008401612,0.00017014849,0.000187826,0.006302601,0.00012062964,0.00072243175,0.00017663678,0.00021681904,0.0066032615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001260238,0.00035792042,0.9942725,0.000058505684,0.00007721337,0.00047606538,0.003259403,0.00044755804,0.00030292073,0.00027728913,0.00043897075,0.00001910108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003715612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030892526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043815565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029551418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002809844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02317214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147639137","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12470","title":"A trouble shared is a trouble halved: The role of family identification and identification with humankind in well‐being during the COVID‐19 pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"COVID-19 and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Feeling; Mental health; Psychology; Anxiety; Identification (biology); Social psychology; Identity (music); Embodied cognition; Physical health; Pandemic; Developmental psychology; Social identity theory; Clinical psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychiatry; Social group; Medicine; Disease","score_opus":0.056433624101000855,"score_gpt":0.3952407684258471,"score_spread":0.33880714432484627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147639137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983367,0.00021277076,0.000035560206,0.00074844394,0.000009632469,0.0000036121867,0.00001185299,4.4907105e-7,0.00064102816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99967444,0.00012322262,0.000025133711,0.000062399995,0.0000039042643,0.0000036627184,0.000007903124,5.342686e-7,0.00009881888],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979771,0.001352469,0.000041656735,0.000105923915,0.00012903872,0.0003937886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956476,0.0017949534,0.0011104449,0.00023599461,0.00030546467,0.0009054435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037777135,0.00017775226,0.0003355473,0.0005355306,0.0027168402,0.0021686605,0.00051930535,0.0007972707,0.0019080606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010084973,0.000328161,0.00034736883,0.0006319414,0.0028328975,0.0016063137,0.0020548806,0.0016432022,0.000111298265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033693234,0.0004136003,0.8052455,0.00008325658,0.00009997938,0.00049705885,0.16042113,0.00012795864,0.0004187444,0.0014205647,0.0011552172,0.029780006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006533518,0.00010577862,0.8502309,0.000074945914,0.000021136908,0.00012071095,0.14804542,0.00018758641,0.00004905109,0.00038759277,0.00075369055,0.000016714244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043500148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068167664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043500148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017338968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016709181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08649391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162420774","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12462","title":"Factors promoting greater preoccupation with a secret","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04452141751000348,"score_gpt":0.4027265097591212,"score_spread":0.35820509224911773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162420774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99887735,0.00007292576,0.0001287083,0.00016200871,0.000004676393,0.0000059961203,0.000021979195,0.0000018426152,0.0007246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952567,0.000069052185,0.00012010078,0.000022928829,0.0000036488632,0.0000034786167,0.000036790305,8.248551e-7,0.00021740557],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994223,0.00019842491,0.000048649264,0.000053501026,0.00013018497,0.00014693539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932815,0.0017199055,0.003198684,0.0005195416,0.0003035151,0.0009768961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010996835,0.00018739335,0.0002164264,0.00047708856,0.00091157213,0.0011346386,0.00023089033,0.0005460409,0.0048556197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058736745,0.00029562518,0.00038878393,0.00034529023,0.00079574133,0.0007343699,0.0010821786,0.0012461446,0.00020324628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088830406,0.00021958831,0.9866551,0.000026181253,0.000048142938,0.00017207205,0.0038259355,0.00006219017,0.0010194102,0.00037810788,0.00012815438,0.007376186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021699661,0.000051772255,0.9959865,0.000011597685,0.0000093988465,0.00014533977,0.003135994,0.00008251396,0.0000977476,0.00021694756,0.0002538847,0.0000060918937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00381981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009632929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048556197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004909594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065292354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016243696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169036453","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12476","title":"The malleability of collective memories: One year after the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Identity, Memory, and Therapy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Collective memory; Malleability; Social psychology; Social change; Group (periodic table); Collective behavior; Social group; Developmental psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.023192959762015096,"score_gpt":0.33381440728723233,"score_spread":0.31062144752521725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169036453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993237,0.000097833174,0.000011111306,0.00022122636,0.00001349622,0.0000041198377,0.000027537908,8.823718e-7,0.0003001488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992804,0.000098751574,0.000014761103,0.000063775835,0.0000062744375,0.0000073515635,0.00005500742,9.912436e-7,0.00047265855],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996389,0.00008052065,0.000014411065,0.00003878588,0.000054521563,0.00017282293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991844,0.00011009773,0.00025975757,0.00006398707,0.00014529284,0.00023637757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010172554,0.00021060415,0.00053370144,0.0005599812,0.005321768,0.0016905296,0.00054637616,0.000827861,0.0016166806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025446268,0.00027217122,0.0001924173,0.0007008848,0.0019136382,0.0011945856,0.0027840196,0.0024030579,0.00022908956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010538417,0.0006788998,0.47667906,0.00014575984,0.000091557384,0.001739373,0.48092642,0.00012740381,0.0027802177,0.00079242967,0.0027053682,0.032279704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000846046,0.00024279325,0.79647094,0.000045850757,0.000020898005,0.00016200564,0.19999383,0.000057642996,0.00031925744,0.000113479866,0.0025409416,0.000023884988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08503494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16963941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08503494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003117383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017754566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16907996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171485778","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12469","title":"I’ll scratch your back if you give me a compliment: Exploring psychological mechanisms underlying compliments’ effects on compliance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Toronto Metropolitan University; Mount Royal University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Compliance (psychology); Social psychology; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Norm of reciprocity; Mood; Priming (agriculture); Norm (philosophy)","score_opus":0.2795089990120052,"score_gpt":0.44648662638895903,"score_spread":0.16697762737695382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171485778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936133,0.00011896767,0.00088444055,0.00029116814,0.000014827674,0.000024515482,0.000009727519,0.000018579385,0.005024576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788207,0.00010278411,0.0013015671,0.00011543222,0.000012861249,0.000024940266,0.000010368786,0.000012914061,0.00053701166],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976362,0.0016353234,0.00008181441,0.00016114017,0.0003776136,0.000107881286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819542,0.012303502,0.0032752238,0.0012845877,0.0005588148,0.0006237104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031234839,0.00022232602,0.0002174022,0.00023100791,0.0004499253,0.0008039415,0.0002485043,0.0005063009,0.0030633237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021256458,0.00024112886,0.00024699396,0.000111687164,0.0011832899,0.00080203696,0.0006969583,0.0010119573,0.00021598092],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010341913,0.008924935,0.25809285,0.0024319652,0.0010172912,0.0031491562,0.09848871,0.0014452467,0.3137461,0.025757737,0.0029697218,0.27363434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060898927,0.006788343,0.9128863,0.00035520474,0.00060287555,0.0015877046,0.015553959,0.0027067678,0.035104778,0.011353465,0.012289084,0.00016260194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044148645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055331236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031234839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026901322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029963034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016518712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179165981","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12481","title":"Communicating group norms through election results","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Normative; Perception; Social psychology; Democracy; Identity (music); Democratic legitimacy; Voting; Social identity theory; Psychology; Political science; Collective identity; Social group; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.051172577035852394,"score_gpt":0.4040350487827297,"score_spread":0.35286247174687735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179165981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6139763,0.00055000605,0.12939265,0.005812741,0.0008329846,0.00059149106,0.0011257498,0.0018931521,0.24582492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98021495,0.000114560025,0.014852624,0.00017083595,0.00008561938,0.00020395752,0.00018040741,0.000099552555,0.004077377],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886656,0.008387758,0.0004207231,0.0006159899,0.0015962026,0.00031378455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9614341,0.028567018,0.0028183255,0.0034378513,0.00311887,0.0006238401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014057836,0.00042909535,0.00036823616,0.0011128527,0.0011828362,0.0030827187,0.00061572477,0.00065883057,0.018628016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06904147,0.00022508389,0.00031785647,0.00078043924,0.0011117694,0.0025897967,0.0018862635,0.0010418727,0.0017472127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022847687,0.0015017404,0.07726743,0.0011032274,0.00031481014,0.0006517931,0.038552642,0.008469517,0.011870549,0.29216215,0.028975978,0.5368455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010082711,0.0044793743,0.18101798,0.00089651236,0.0009217786,0.0009233271,0.0261933,0.10595824,0.037991706,0.49093878,0.14912704,0.0005436655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007950284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001125921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018628016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007464528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062101625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07434583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206551659","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12519","title":"People prefer to diversify across different types of prosocial behaviour","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Casual; Psychology; Social psychology; Helping behavior; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.04119979829542892,"score_gpt":0.3921544987503774,"score_spread":0.3509547004549485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206551659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99901724,0.00004947403,0.00013982602,0.000038460294,0.0000026882265,0.000010778606,0.000022295188,0.0000029276314,0.0007163927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989911,0.00006994789,0.00043635772,0.0000805318,0.00000537179,0.00002333468,0.0000651761,0.0000015471551,0.00032666835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994006,0.0001920545,0.000057563015,0.000102000246,0.00015444218,0.00009339624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973833,0.00056914054,0.0010316228,0.00035510515,0.00021972887,0.0004410593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011462185,0.00021753447,0.00037446382,0.00053374574,0.00052133435,0.0010243523,0.00018526743,0.0005738108,0.0016759608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004032512,0.0002037084,0.00031084454,0.0002512524,0.0006241332,0.00064688234,0.00088059786,0.0005614587,0.0002876834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012171178,0.0009014792,0.8893605,0.00026014537,0.0005680938,0.00030905375,0.013630078,0.0004687996,0.021509165,0.0005971546,0.000699869,0.07047867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029192595,0.0005050187,0.9932401,0.000019293986,0.000035566456,0.00022732366,0.003909899,0.00024748573,0.00045921342,0.00058066903,0.0007261015,0.00002020583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006965021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020044826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016759608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019121676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012868227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0060617924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212896572","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12527","title":"Authority, conformity and obedience: Applying Friedrich’s theory of authority to the classics","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Obedience; Conformity; Milgram experiment; Legitimacy; Psychology; Social psychology; Interpretation (philosophy); Power (physics); Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05031489390333131,"score_gpt":0.38396686233731675,"score_spread":0.3336519684339854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212896572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23493554,0.021803489,0.12881099,0.06058041,0.0012705276,0.00018377215,0.00010187914,0.00015756057,0.55215585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807144,0.0028354505,0.009616913,0.0012569056,0.00037862387,0.000072471565,0.000017180017,0.000019798685,0.005088245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981415,0.0009774722,0.00009755569,0.0002640969,0.00039653617,0.00012269085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965905,0.002452642,0.00031328035,0.00032209468,0.00021298684,0.00010843253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004003671,0.0003277386,0.00046405732,0.0023415645,0.0018405478,0.0027689794,0.00078294025,0.0016862145,0.0016416627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074751414,0.00020365404,0.00048766253,0.0013126482,0.034572884,0.0063016256,0.0022634056,0.0024790908,0.00016540576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008866828,0.000013689472,0.00022131183,0.000016762728,0.0000039894257,0.000043949087,0.0021973245,0.00034959757,0.00005738041,0.9914278,0.0003954588,0.0052638208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007251703,0.000012816904,0.0004827167,0.000024653029,0.0000022587308,0.000027289298,0.00036663903,0.0004841519,0.00006014927,0.9936878,0.0048388676,0.0000054814627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050892807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023868869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005521012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005521012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016514813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040057957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220720101","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12537","title":"Reductions in perceived COVID‐19 threat amid UK’s mass public vaccination programme coincide with reductions in outgroup avoidance (but not prejudice)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Outgroup; Prejudice (legal term); Social psychology; Psychology; Perception; Context (archaeology); Ingroups and outgroups; Social distance; Developmental psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Disease; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.12212339761683423,"score_gpt":0.3346951268896534,"score_spread":0.2125717292728192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220720101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99906796,0.00002925476,0.000026871905,0.00006802337,0.0000040892764,0.0000017058999,0.000017135824,0.000001008163,0.00078385056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996637,0.000019643398,0.000022619031,0.000023219354,0.0000018759266,0.0000023230682,0.000028319828,4.9279475e-7,0.00023786574],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971455,0.000088424196,0.000012448642,0.0000486569,0.00006405046,0.000072009054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809796,0.00039280232,0.00080030406,0.00013679873,0.00022821598,0.00034397826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067909044,0.00009314175,0.0001373168,0.00019299904,0.0003962092,0.00061832374,0.00015179257,0.0003477603,0.002236779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004568006,0.00011359451,0.000115387564,0.00012642719,0.00041353208,0.0002775098,0.0005119355,0.00071952544,0.00021038279],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010238755,0.00053084263,0.9558801,0.00004647861,0.00006197127,0.00012597872,0.009271658,0.00018807831,0.01170924,0.00028580308,0.0009294361,0.019946527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011344033,0.00005516774,0.9989599,0.0000038315184,0.0000019492948,0.000010330036,0.00063368736,0.000024580593,0.00016774063,0.000023474904,0.00011642924,0.0000017994809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012274634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023103999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012274634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000550274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037294548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024406374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285086438","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12558","title":"Effects of intergroup contact on explicit and implicit outgroup attitudes: A longitudinal field study with majority and minority group members","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Outgroup; Psychology; Longitudinal study; Anxiety; Contact theory; Social psychology; Ingroups and outgroups; Quality (philosophy); Association (psychology); Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.018182493098824956,"score_gpt":0.3428535979538106,"score_spread":0.3246711048549856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285086438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99984336,0.000021883896,0.000025536283,0.000009851435,0.0000014599765,0.000006855486,0.00001524306,6.94564e-7,0.000075066404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992218,0.00003370863,0.00012096038,0.000023386592,0.000004000661,0.000031586886,0.0000777811,0.000001022733,0.00048575347],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992632,0.00034128365,0.000026756497,0.00010451035,0.000100443474,0.00016374749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99550325,0.0010384078,0.0010729017,0.0005182534,0.0004340493,0.0014330329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032177106,0.0003604716,0.0003526285,0.0007769613,0.002029334,0.0010064802,0.00031156433,0.0006574625,0.0011870175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041840654,0.0003713431,0.00042301646,0.00034722232,0.0008660957,0.0007469367,0.0008193486,0.0012605367,0.00035056457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016481131,0.00731748,0.9620964,0.000018743396,0.000062419625,0.00029307275,0.012837477,0.00006939845,0.0057703457,0.00013511743,0.00020625004,0.009545309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038501417,0.0036682158,0.98960835,0.000012606029,0.00003167608,0.00017252687,0.0048959944,0.00016883078,0.00083350646,0.00012045591,0.00042633957,0.000022982049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008057234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012243265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008057234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004308437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005445342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017017066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306938082","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12590","title":"Peer charity donation, gratitude, and self‐esteem among left‐behind children","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities","keywords":"Gratitude; Psychology; Social psychology; Donation; Self-esteem; Peer group; Developmental psychology; Law","score_opus":0.015382435609116943,"score_gpt":0.3163445321375551,"score_spread":0.30096209652843814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306938082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998142,0.00003475341,0.000006840599,0.000017856508,0.0000010610767,0.0000019765114,0.000010706198,6.023026e-7,0.00011197738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99982256,0.000038031874,0.000026845773,0.000006878723,8.14738e-7,0.000005348589,0.000015137428,2.3415676e-7,0.00008415591],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999772,0.0000658848,0.0000133259055,0.00002822784,0.000042442713,0.000078124795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926907,0.000093253555,0.00034055606,0.000029125344,0.000051494884,0.00021656227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051946106,0.00015991941,0.00017561558,0.00025339882,0.00038126772,0.00027077485,0.00013798081,0.00015847883,0.0010466859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016495899,0.00009374152,0.0002359155,0.00014337781,0.00028073724,0.00019661446,0.00046701657,0.00038752635,0.000051624243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038844493,0.0011178325,0.9785069,0.00008369611,0.00004234343,0.00018332798,0.002144444,0.000069510905,0.0012248027,0.00019358752,0.00032641442,0.015718697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013497124,0.00027414065,0.9976413,0.000019455905,0.00002076624,0.00006276677,0.0013613593,0.00009430463,0.00028321287,0.00003780528,0.00018716943,0.0000042454717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046463204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007405709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046463204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004588256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051991805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009238601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308552783","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12596","title":"Purity, politics, and polarization: Political ideology moderates threat‐induced shifts in moral purity beliefs","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Conservatism; Politics; Social psychology; Psychology; Moral standards; Polarization (electrochemistry); Foundation (evidence); Perspective (graphical); Positive economics; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.04530386215412827,"score_gpt":0.3680572296114927,"score_spread":0.3227533674573644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308552783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982058,0.000029333396,0.000059258477,0.00007667798,0.0000065838417,0.000004348787,0.000010093688,0.0000024554226,0.0016055113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990257,0.000040710238,0.000108082444,0.0000772804,0.0000075428493,0.000015227488,0.000026542777,0.0000052289756,0.00069375447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943846,0.00029980502,0.000014360233,0.000071368144,0.00009616996,0.000079732024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974101,0.0010508685,0.00075683417,0.00015674409,0.000092001275,0.00053341524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000975996,0.00022477657,0.00027889168,0.00028445717,0.0006244893,0.0012253625,0.00021250143,0.00063042005,0.007188974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040092724,0.00028134976,0.0001517839,0.00021679816,0.0007856906,0.0004639958,0.0011184157,0.001188738,0.00042484532],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.028536988,0.022301411,0.54793376,0.00057556626,0.00046407807,0.0008417749,0.023396324,0.0014626125,0.3059874,0.0061569517,0.0030643323,0.059278764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013488022,0.0010279369,0.99112177,0.00002652036,0.000047557707,0.00007744449,0.0018277431,0.0007870454,0.0026069803,0.0014260607,0.00089376915,0.000022205384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008921751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020769273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007188974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027591552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035158524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02404952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308896286","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12604","title":"Having the right face for the job: The effect of facial width‐to‐height ratio on job selection preferences","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Trait; Perception; Collar; Face (sociological concept); Social psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.030273530946927765,"score_gpt":0.3587332663823963,"score_spread":0.3284597354354685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308896286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968855,0.000046494068,0.00020867006,0.00006938744,0.0000117611935,0.000005340394,0.000024734201,0.000003114635,0.00274504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99870574,0.000028828405,0.0003490555,0.00007730451,0.000007878332,0.000010180027,0.000024582307,0.000008234121,0.0007882939],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991978,0.00044114966,0.00002555406,0.0001404691,0.0001318961,0.000063103515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936825,0.0043124584,0.0009146599,0.00045333066,0.00018843528,0.0004485909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001592694,0.00022478621,0.000242095,0.00022155682,0.00034768076,0.0007805136,0.00019352754,0.00046198044,0.0073172315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070438166,0.00015868979,0.0001580183,0.00013689895,0.00054712145,0.00027777237,0.00037191974,0.0005466429,0.00055411534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015065654,0.0050568087,0.6293448,0.00020749538,0.0003232338,0.00044429483,0.0046616015,0.000983181,0.25115877,0.001991759,0.0015126206,0.08924977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000606371,0.0009922213,0.99134326,0.000016917073,0.00004705003,0.00012033486,0.0010146968,0.0009786693,0.0042663044,0.00052758225,0.0006106675,0.000021682275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015981786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028970577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073172315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022426022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015201955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024478614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311309509","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12614","title":"The distinct associations of ingroup attachment and glorification with responses to the coronavirus pandemic: Evidence from a multilevel investigation in 21 countries","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Pandemic; Psychology; Government (linguistics); Coronavirus; Public health; Social psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.22297396204919492,"score_gpt":0.44534784963867086,"score_spread":0.22237388758947593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311309509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99875903,0.0001557801,0.00018819324,0.0001017972,0.0000066950583,0.0000103047605,0.000045379318,7.5717963e-7,0.00073213264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99958044,0.0000960116,0.00011226756,0.000043530967,0.0000036378053,0.00001433805,0.00003991366,0.0000015684341,0.00010821096],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99274194,0.004831766,0.00034982854,0.00075071957,0.0006158636,0.00070991844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98345965,0.006652751,0.0051509077,0.0022820805,0.0011996584,0.0012548337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00722425,0.00035149002,0.0006169401,0.0009924477,0.002069428,0.0018891107,0.0006944696,0.0009191262,0.0029712403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015999708,0.00050123374,0.0009673735,0.0014202488,0.0025546716,0.0012481415,0.0033386217,0.0015519607,0.00023767403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014757525,0.00017586809,0.97154546,0.0000690146,0.00051343377,0.00007966753,0.02101281,0.00008608982,0.00026015477,0.0005220721,0.00019492979,0.0053928946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000683157,0.000104802486,0.9858298,0.00004385122,0.00007900148,0.000047427544,0.012987938,0.00019024393,0.000081529164,0.00022457102,0.00038953687,0.0000143748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022935776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03145782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022935776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010630033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008125861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045604527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385501931","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12676","title":"The utility of nostalgia for unhealthy populations: A systematic review and narrative analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Narrative; Action (physics); Theme (computing); Social connectedness; Social psychology","score_opus":0.17641330358645785,"score_gpt":0.5102851660942443,"score_spread":0.3338718625077865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385501931","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006610047,0.98313004,0.0013452326,0.0016807007,0.0002710044,0.004649268,0.0014913012,0.000023235487,0.0007992039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12736085,0.8491457,0.0062710014,0.0020719918,0.00021906571,0.013508834,0.00096638955,0.0000202774,0.00043586118],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.96064776,0.017466502,0.014056013,0.0018658327,0.0052556605,0.00070821255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8893041,0.08445157,0.016336093,0.0017683898,0.007466235,0.0006736332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035377633,0.0015222395,0.0060063424,0.019061418,0.0011109314,0.003933972,0.0017809118,0.0017913756,0.0031793704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13813217,0.0010824142,0.00735418,0.014883253,0.0016017976,0.0041313344,0.0032486012,0.0015464554,0.0002252782],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021447086,0.0000178039,0.0022058054,0.95445377,0.007790847,0.00020858021,0.0019807788,0.00011167603,0.00017240351,0.000840329,0.0016399386,0.030363614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001480717,0.00017514979,0.004435946,0.94250995,0.03489031,0.0003463028,0.002074738,0.00016591232,0.00017938836,0.00088767224,0.014136522,0.000049988284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00667375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021899879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035377633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076529467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016983025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18709707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386592161","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12685","title":"The role of group memberships and school identification on student well‐being","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Identification (biology); Social identity theory; Social psychology; Mediation; Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Association (psychology); Well-being; Longitudinal study; Mental health; Situated; Social group; Developmental psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.02433552628886244,"score_gpt":0.37398466575960576,"score_spread":0.34964913947074333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386592161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987754,0.000121063946,0.00005908587,0.00015231072,0.000005343364,0.000003637504,0.000015135901,0.0000015073406,0.0008665415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999744,0.000059211903,0.000033619155,0.000009253188,0.000003370665,0.0000028312043,0.000012497089,9.0597877e-7,0.00013432204],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794453,0.0012971192,0.00007264646,0.00013179838,0.00023672024,0.00031712063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98923653,0.004567402,0.0025642803,0.00064702047,0.00044316088,0.0025415772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035090982,0.00025271025,0.00031023347,0.00087038026,0.0010541993,0.001297929,0.0004359359,0.00053199875,0.0039660074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011385069,0.00016773093,0.0005113768,0.00062976434,0.0011207061,0.00093188183,0.00165774,0.0010321853,0.00029456904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100398735,0.0002697153,0.98694056,0.000014960801,0.00006283074,0.00003946521,0.0020080775,0.000074345495,0.00012809882,0.00036569702,0.00009119145,0.009904603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019300123,0.00008789217,0.99730635,0.000017279455,0.000018629244,0.000018029927,0.001968382,0.00018033771,0.00004644362,0.00018798531,0.00016311293,0.0000034920024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004953546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0095951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004953546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042897326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063195045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018558145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388457808","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12695","title":"Why do we never have enough time? Economic inequality fuels the perception of time poverty by aggravating status anxiety","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Poverty; Inequality; Psychology; Economic inequality; Perception; Anxiety; Social psychology; Test (biology); Demographic economics; Social inequality; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.023824204190939544,"score_gpt":0.3347713769932334,"score_spread":0.31094717280229384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388457808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99746835,0.00018486347,0.00017240342,0.00067034416,0.000013117531,0.0000036853583,0.00001786894,0.0000017052946,0.0014677249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99970883,0.00007490357,0.00004022451,0.00007749803,0.0000060299285,0.000001788913,0.0000073084566,4.10881e-7,0.00008292161],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967885,0.000120340024,0.000015320205,0.000025291072,0.00007150543,0.00008864453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998536,0.00043932305,0.0005469206,0.00005227482,0.0000689105,0.00035653994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053460087,0.00010529625,0.00019010727,0.00031908523,0.0007492993,0.0010283868,0.00015902104,0.00032043448,0.0025713646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027286056,0.00010840892,0.00020623105,0.00021835821,0.0011099973,0.00062260067,0.000695649,0.00071892876,0.00007432913],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069503614,0.00078079384,0.91231453,0.00018810654,0.00025553303,0.00077663246,0.022845635,0.00026254778,0.0064856787,0.0045402856,0.001740706,0.049114607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002472067,0.00042562143,0.97300196,0.000057239,0.000055843786,0.00030033194,0.020145882,0.0003595089,0.00044693245,0.0029812807,0.0021771146,0.000023454977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030481971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047763395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030481971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003554925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003014377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008602083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389452749","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12707","title":"Canadian politicians' rhetoric on Twitter/X: Analysing prejudice and inclusion towards Muslims using structural topic modelling and rhetorical analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Mitacs; UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Rhetoric; Populism; Prejudice (legal term); Rhetorical question; Sociology; Multiculturalism; Politics; Ideology; Solidarity; Social media; Social psychology; Media studies; Gender studies; Political science; Psychology; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09448230342171532,"score_gpt":0.4291919257504752,"score_spread":0.3347096223287599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389452749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676193,0.00073496596,0.0024147446,0.0021281957,0.00007055952,0.0002604611,0.006397893,0.00009827182,0.020275451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98689574,0.000496429,0.0036947683,0.0002469255,0.000046158533,0.00024365127,0.0032128664,0.000047618134,0.005115908],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834657,0.00036884783,0.00006171844,0.00019676604,0.0007174985,0.00030848457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907381,0.005570324,0.00088532775,0.00020969161,0.0022390387,0.00035759798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026090145,0.00046022318,0.0004056113,0.0055964277,0.0046100407,0.0036360663,0.00068861555,0.00073906075,0.0021482685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010373231,0.00023500492,0.00033169135,0.0063419556,0.0022975698,0.0012947737,0.0013219089,0.0009894548,0.00043714812],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073521753,0.00017122367,0.26552898,0.0020977315,0.00012051008,0.0011307031,0.5456124,0.0026330824,0.011403531,0.021270018,0.025566518,0.12373014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004740229,0.00009682099,0.48593098,0.00067993987,0.0002018862,0.00023991254,0.32917336,0.018239945,0.0056854114,0.003702559,0.15574734,0.00025450662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8748607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91438836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1251393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02027841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020878172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2517525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391176893","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12726","title":"Issue Information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Holloway, University of London; University of Massachusetts Amherst; Universität Innsbruck; Peking University; Université de Lausanne; Universidade de Lisboa; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Tel Aviv University; Simon Fraser University; Sapienza Università di Roma; University of Hong Kong; Universiteit Gent; Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca; Western Sydney University; Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Miami; Durham University; Cardiff University; University of Sussex; University of Leeds; KU Leuven; University of St Andrews; University of Limerick; Flinders University; Trent University; Queen Margaret University; McMaster University; Nottingham Trent University; University of Oxford; University of South Florida; University of Dundee; Johns Hopkins University; Lehigh University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Universitetet i Oslo; University of Exeter; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.025333548971883807,"score_gpt":0.3682861169627905,"score_spread":0.3429525679909067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391176893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020273535,0.00054507726,0.00047050478,0.0027198985,0.008803471,0.0003654483,0.04570591,0.0032110019,0.93797594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00060880656,0.0003097779,0.00026763984,0.0008120332,0.0010080052,0.00014286136,0.013306108,0.0008531699,0.9826916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989303,0.00013395376,0.00007025657,0.00014715479,0.0005765836,0.0001417996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961951,0.00057523686,0.00017875522,0.00037078545,0.0015810765,0.0010990342],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012128275,0.0019553588,0.0018154684,0.005277092,0.0015446505,0.006592391,0.0022709873,0.0033605786,0.9605598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075277826,0.00062196073,0.0010335934,0.00577227,0.00059822015,0.003485494,0.0029747735,0.0017509651,0.9234244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136157305,0.000012582012,0.000023424187,0.000127457,0.0000010891508,0.000008158409,0.0000056738404,0.000025929672,0.000038479593,0.00044419305,0.98438185,0.014917512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024977166,0.000016089893,0.0002272533,0.00008963608,0.0000017941229,0.000011928907,0.000021568165,0.000050105507,0.000050992257,0.0008483361,0.99865156,0.0000057701095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031857844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053084143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039440215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013704272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023891372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05625671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392586384","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12737","title":"System circumvention: Dishonest‐illegal transgressions are perceived as justified in non‐meritocratic societies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Meritocracy; Sympathy; Luck; Social psychology; Psychology; System justification; Criminology; Law; Political science; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06572089551318167,"score_gpt":0.3364381870002274,"score_spread":0.2707172914870457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392586384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98997986,0.00012189018,0.00094762415,0.00045658412,0.000015614445,0.00001348533,0.0000125267115,0.000008961355,0.0084434645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994431,0.000034654047,0.00016996055,0.00011226627,0.000006161756,0.0000052155337,0.000009605093,0.0000028908837,0.00021610604],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99460274,0.0032633774,0.0003190161,0.00030114444,0.0011094752,0.0004042171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769703,0.006465389,0.012498249,0.0017225277,0.001160894,0.0011826075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045759594,0.00034816936,0.00027362094,0.0007225389,0.0017911666,0.0031653366,0.00032473725,0.0013070331,0.0036201198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015302465,0.00025529444,0.00048996805,0.00038215125,0.006103628,0.0024750212,0.0037350832,0.002196052,0.0002472614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096993544,0.000540633,0.5884329,0.0005858523,0.00053279824,0.0014315174,0.31333315,0.0007726616,0.021762164,0.028321404,0.0016183417,0.041698616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014157574,0.0010966422,0.7442753,0.00043415435,0.0002553425,0.002534704,0.20784952,0.0032190252,0.003551309,0.021197563,0.015229967,0.00021487406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017395968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024879954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045759594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001055745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063305907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02420026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394013002","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12743","title":"Egoistic value is positively associated with pro‐environmental attitude and behaviour when the environmental problems are psychologically close","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Education University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Psychology; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Association (psychology); Relation (database); Environmental pollution; Geography","score_opus":0.011821083987448364,"score_gpt":0.27675423122760745,"score_spread":0.2649331472401591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394013002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99785304,0.000049353974,0.00010697519,0.00011239143,0.000003351819,0.0000030588037,0.000012604067,0.0000017513913,0.0018575838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996228,0.000038630988,0.00009377895,0.000017365137,0.0000018640122,0.0000017787684,0.000017790475,9.4851e-7,0.00020501204],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927694,0.00033496533,0.000035585042,0.00005723694,0.00018778977,0.00010757236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991865,0.0019367207,0.0036932377,0.0004052783,0.000611634,0.001488096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008581942,0.00014025137,0.00020851356,0.00065979664,0.00049079774,0.0010003038,0.00021827014,0.00047971477,0.002294176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051734047,0.00019533187,0.00034259167,0.00049238297,0.0008796796,0.00028002134,0.0008337978,0.00082437927,0.000160619],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046037476,0.00011470869,0.99529016,0.000014025073,0.00006774303,0.00006001333,0.0005930457,0.00006318301,0.000355006,0.00019944078,0.000061398736,0.0031353391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022496547,0.000036019093,0.99848217,0.000007186403,0.000014605154,0.00008821326,0.00066790986,0.00018209487,0.000053903423,0.00026367782,0.00019783994,0.000004267901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034951367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007481112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034951367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043266284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005027005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0076748133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394692076","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12746","title":"Issue Information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Holloway, University of London; University of Massachusetts Amherst; Universität Innsbruck; Peking University; Université de Lausanne; Universidade de Lisboa; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Tel Aviv University; Simon Fraser University; Sapienza Università di Roma; University of Hong Kong; Universiteit Gent; Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca; Western Sydney University; Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Miami; Durham University; Cardiff University; University of Sussex; University of Leeds; KU Leuven; University of St Andrews; University of Limerick; Flinders University; Trent University; Queen Margaret University; McMaster University; Nottingham Trent University; University of Oxford; University of South Florida; University of Dundee; Johns Hopkins University; Lehigh University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Universitetet i Oslo; University of Exeter; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03412961909160862,"score_gpt":0.2816191236948944,"score_spread":0.24748950460328578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394692076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021345839,0.0005188076,0.00044967787,0.0025452469,0.0083547,0.00027343252,0.053421035,0.0027433655,0.9314803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00070622243,0.00026027363,0.00020427186,0.000822412,0.00097182894,0.0001069175,0.013608134,0.0007494906,0.98257047],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989611,0.000102090635,0.000058657035,0.00015541003,0.00057768496,0.00014499933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720496,0.0003987461,0.00013728903,0.00030221956,0.0011500366,0.0008067324],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009590188,0.0017588121,0.0016913072,0.004698528,0.0013655539,0.0059891036,0.0020132766,0.0030941558,0.9497274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059955455,0.000561165,0.0010221666,0.0045604715,0.0005236434,0.00271949,0.0024292276,0.001787934,0.915113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016874794,0.000013856095,0.000026774705,0.00009582769,0.000001372426,0.000008547783,0.0000042706997,0.000033235814,0.00003956264,0.00057583535,0.9853263,0.013857537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023665434,0.000013924202,0.0002500387,0.00006790189,0.0000018804702,0.000009087816,0.000013362684,0.00005756931,0.000053620955,0.0010046823,0.99849904,0.0000052405335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003959445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072846697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050272584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013968911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002218238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071707666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394853351","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12751","title":"Honour, acculturation and well‐being: Evidence from the <scp>UK</scp> and Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Acculturation; Immigration; Social psychology; Psychology; Mainstream; Dignity; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.061901054024493675,"score_gpt":0.3647814399028562,"score_spread":0.3028803858783625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394853351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99361897,0.0028025557,0.00003324821,0.00029889506,0.000011550404,0.000011374509,0.0003637367,0.0000016050766,0.002857951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972881,0.0019585537,0.00004754354,0.0001025051,0.0000056039617,0.00000717642,0.00023106822,0.0000027420435,0.00035665563],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990446,0.00017561538,0.00006486068,0.00012373713,0.0002938873,0.00029715087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950546,0.0009910328,0.0009936846,0.00024299439,0.0017345627,0.0009831302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001702353,0.00028211984,0.00049549795,0.001759621,0.0034773992,0.0021959215,0.00086193153,0.00040798596,0.0019822952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00512006,0.00021294867,0.00046469367,0.004283587,0.0022712627,0.00042384758,0.0018023538,0.0006285281,0.0001071245],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018158616,0.000046327154,0.96810603,0.00022250459,0.00023960184,0.00025989665,0.0150574045,0.00006628607,0.00014491995,0.0005188338,0.000744993,0.0144116245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005708043,0.000018901312,0.9913202,0.00012604645,0.000049006874,0.000057198267,0.007079613,0.000030770694,0.000039451617,0.000038926675,0.0012239248,0.000010193295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96718997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98156965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032810032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067188386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012760046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06600648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396871482","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12759","title":"Religious engagement and antibody response to the COVID‐19 vaccine","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"European Research Council","keywords":"Religiosity; Mediation; Moderation; Psychology; Attendance; Social psychology; Church attendance; General Social Survey; Public health; Sociology; Medicine; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.05158213045155298,"score_gpt":0.4378881373467492,"score_spread":0.38630600689519623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396871482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978143,0.0002275731,0.00009178453,0.0003071778,0.000013052437,0.000016944365,0.00032776652,0.0000019863385,0.0011993729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99918014,0.00009322658,0.000096076175,0.00007175188,0.000009633532,0.000013944203,0.00017694822,8.9533285e-7,0.00035731916],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987502,0.00075740955,0.00006271453,0.0001167205,0.00013909765,0.00017383444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899024,0.0028252248,0.0049927947,0.00042847358,0.0005646964,0.0012864883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023049442,0.00012974955,0.00015842021,0.00031186684,0.00036078363,0.00068221544,0.00035218452,0.00049328984,0.0045439866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01470172,0.00013965312,0.0002853922,0.00037185146,0.00024792523,0.00042712587,0.0008109852,0.0012376062,0.0004196137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008619271,0.00023144568,0.9940952,0.000023181425,0.000058134712,0.00002090067,0.0005026639,0.00004528771,0.0001175909,0.00011018477,0.0002492666,0.00445992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034903633,0.00009921935,0.9989214,0.00002177858,0.000011744295,0.000019448496,0.00044274706,0.00010420742,0.000042830026,0.000055914505,0.00027493597,0.0000022417178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005294288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067687286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005294288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041044457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003022167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015201151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400589831","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12788","title":"Issue Information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Holloway, University of London; University of Massachusetts Amherst; Universität Innsbruck; Peking University; Université de Lausanne; Universidade de Lisboa; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Tel Aviv University; Simon Fraser University; Sapienza Università di Roma; University of Hong Kong; Universiteit Gent; Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca; Western Sydney University; Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Miami; Durham University; Cardiff University; University of Sussex; University of Leeds; KU Leuven; University of St Andrews; University of Limerick; Flinders University; Trent University; Queen Margaret University; McMaster University; Nottingham Trent University; University of Oxford; University of South Florida; University of Dundee; Johns Hopkins University; Lehigh University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Universitetet i Oslo; University of Exeter; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02279502943043251,"score_gpt":0.3397414397859367,"score_spread":0.3169464103555042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400589831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026523604,0.00036755556,0.0007512373,0.0019439212,0.005971973,0.00033825013,0.03440702,0.0038646255,0.9520902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006696212,0.00022574718,0.00037796653,0.00070708356,0.00080700824,0.00010483242,0.009589216,0.0009208706,0.9865976],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992737,0.000074971715,0.000041851592,0.00011327551,0.00039828988,0.000097875025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970421,0.00045533144,0.00012751338,0.00030311832,0.0011783129,0.0008935206],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009834296,0.0016071108,0.001399857,0.004559978,0.001188305,0.0049377717,0.0017265306,0.003048087,0.9614171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059906337,0.00054283085,0.0009963234,0.0039700666,0.0004678069,0.0025661478,0.002364291,0.0014003824,0.9083812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019829658,0.000022806391,0.000050281236,0.00011857176,0.0000016642657,0.0000150906735,0.0000077192435,0.000034074557,0.00007606554,0.000608814,0.9701036,0.028941369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002605209,0.000019761614,0.00036432073,0.00007149136,0.0000026073078,0.000019681529,0.000021006015,0.00005774168,0.00007368228,0.0009868697,0.9983504,0.0000063531206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023523297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051972046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03858292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082009385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016697994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055033743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403693256","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12806","title":"Policy as normative influence? On the relationship between parental leave policy and social norms in gender division of childcare across 48 countries","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; York University; University of Waterloo; University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation; Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Economic and Social Research Council; Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Jilin Office of Philosophy and Social Science; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Masarykova Univerzita; Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo; National Research University Higher School of Economics; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Canada Research Chairs; Centro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión Social; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Normative; Operationalization; Psychology; Norm (philosophy); Parental leave; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Social policy; Descriptive statistics; Work (physics); Political science","score_opus":0.055448093314446674,"score_gpt":0.41884434558040357,"score_spread":0.3633962522659569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403693256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99698585,0.00018370437,0.00018780754,0.00028593675,0.000011171157,0.0000038861294,0.000036048077,0.0000018317778,0.0023036485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998424,0.00003913109,0.000035715675,0.000017054299,0.0000029256546,0.0000022323848,0.000013533974,9.557746e-7,0.000045974382],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964977,0.0020241465,0.00019295825,0.0004004091,0.00049336813,0.0003914878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98130256,0.009559733,0.0058692107,0.0011494638,0.0013781587,0.00074085867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005838787,0.00013441732,0.00024119645,0.0008953938,0.0006269469,0.0014438693,0.00033067501,0.00036584015,0.0017831043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014841728,0.00017992554,0.0002519082,0.0009466052,0.0025601997,0.0011118598,0.0010715878,0.00076305267,0.00010308748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057522975,0.000047815323,0.98455435,0.000018595962,0.000050107737,0.000037682596,0.0060879397,0.00015896863,0.00015521224,0.0015949702,0.00008504889,0.007151696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017863757,0.00003387588,0.9920887,0.000026973816,0.00001136205,0.000024329265,0.0068239532,0.0001864327,0.00010529833,0.0002767994,0.00041472935,0.000005695968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014147218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017501052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014147218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006534614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074113434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030878782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404720691","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12819","title":"Cues of trait dominance elicit inferences of psychological ownership","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Trait; Psychology; Dominance (genetics); Social psychology; Social dominance orientation; Feeling; Psychological research; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.07897564660031435,"score_gpt":0.418189315132173,"score_spread":0.33921366853185864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404720691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99408877,0.00014019136,0.00044549472,0.00007128537,0.00001266745,0.000013624748,0.00004596577,0.000007925319,0.0051741563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980434,0.00011449521,0.00078140735,0.00010439004,0.000009156048,0.000017157885,0.000063100015,0.00000957698,0.0008573214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914587,0.0003323109,0.000046485107,0.00017721693,0.00021852275,0.00007952183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98701245,0.0077287033,0.0028821062,0.0010164111,0.00058802334,0.0007722256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012669312,0.00029461648,0.00022979529,0.00049846416,0.0004694117,0.001737428,0.00015613965,0.0007521929,0.0047972086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01581379,0.00033536242,0.00019872349,0.00025810336,0.00063533173,0.0009839798,0.001599079,0.00094595965,0.00025860016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040896577,0.0019335613,0.6011925,0.0011862919,0.0003772709,0.0013508523,0.024357855,0.00061683677,0.2827199,0.0051410305,0.0019556913,0.0750786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005373537,0.00088160974,0.97442526,0.00012738555,0.00015496973,0.0005365541,0.0057674693,0.0010596765,0.011992928,0.003144394,0.0017903688,0.00006555445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012464966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025120692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047972086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027693357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021737399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016048312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406805786","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12854","title":"Overcoming low status or maintaining high status? A multinational examination of the association between socioeconomic status and honour","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"H2020 European Research Council","keywords":"Honour; Socioeconomic status; Social psychology; Multinational corporation; Promotion (chess); Psychology; Association (psychology); Sociology; Gender studies; Developmental psychology; Demography; Political science; Law; Population","score_opus":0.036449166058298184,"score_gpt":0.3632780786514287,"score_spread":0.3268289125931305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406805786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99941254,0.000057360125,0.000015318989,0.000055791006,0.0000018784446,0.000001142604,0.000015699386,1.992635e-7,0.00044011252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998215,0.000034497978,0.000014379895,0.000012766128,0.0000024609594,0.000001205834,0.000014479747,2.8215482e-7,0.000098478245],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940085,0.0003536256,0.000031695934,0.00005655803,0.000074043826,0.00008334377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99498016,0.0017508708,0.0019467344,0.00028998416,0.00037903822,0.0006531791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022379851,0.0001152567,0.00016652491,0.00058565405,0.00057359063,0.00080728927,0.00026461776,0.00025700545,0.0019428966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064201495,0.00010487228,0.00016365045,0.00088865677,0.0008217523,0.00061987055,0.0010066115,0.0005079909,0.0001381405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027198845,0.000018610972,0.9969688,0.0000049760506,0.000017857878,0.000032090702,0.0011322114,0.000006982856,0.00006916009,0.00005775649,0.000024160394,0.0016402431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.311141e-7,0.000031425636,0.9975303,0.000004329624,0.000004559277,0.000027797505,0.0022183524,0.000028549259,0.00001623263,0.00003113378,0.00010564985,0.0000012550249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008867113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019156035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008867113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002163845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027889805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017630994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406913832","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12863","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Holloway, University of London; University of Massachusetts Amherst; Universität Innsbruck; Peking University; Université de Lausanne; Universidade de Lisboa; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Tel Aviv University; Simon Fraser University; Sapienza Università di Roma; University of Hong Kong; Universiteit Gent; Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca; Western Sydney University; Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Miami; Durham University; Cardiff University; University of Sussex; University of Leeds; KU Leuven; University of St Andrews; University of Limerick; Flinders University; Trent University; Queen Margaret University; McMaster University; Nottingham Trent University; University of Oxford; University of South Florida; University of Dundee; Johns Hopkins University; Lehigh University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Universitetet i Oslo; University of Exeter; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01932926962333846,"score_gpt":0.336730928336579,"score_spread":0.31740165871324055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406913832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002689101,0.00037993936,0.00074526767,0.0019317007,0.006051401,0.00033020502,0.031438492,0.003586749,0.95526737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00066571584,0.00022079429,0.00035454665,0.00066537404,0.00077725557,0.00009630089,0.0085382415,0.0008253408,0.9878565],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992835,0.00007486827,0.00004102975,0.000111943016,0.00039344392,0.000095214884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970921,0.00044738583,0.0001256683,0.0002927306,0.0011557466,0.0008864028],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009815258,0.0015673006,0.0013394547,0.004414711,0.0011574577,0.0048825904,0.0016774439,0.0030077714,0.96056485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005928129,0.0005246371,0.0009645554,0.0037621185,0.00046129507,0.0024758948,0.0022837634,0.0013678318,0.90479183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020740921,0.00002287805,0.000050891915,0.000118469405,0.0000016585767,0.00001555211,0.000007876662,0.00003407467,0.00007792669,0.0006346604,0.96904904,0.029966196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002565785,0.000020383857,0.00036688684,0.000071721755,0.0000025933164,0.00002058346,0.000021319724,0.00005887379,0.00007489636,0.000992024,0.9983388,0.000006129748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002304384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005138814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03943515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081557926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001631806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05624938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406928270","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12813","title":"Issue Information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Holloway, University of London; University of Massachusetts Amherst; Universität Innsbruck; Peking University; Université de Lausanne; Universidade de Lisboa; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Tel Aviv University; Simon Fraser University; Sapienza Università di Roma; University of Hong Kong; Universiteit Gent; Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca; Western Sydney University; Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Miami; Durham University; Cardiff University; University of Sussex; University of Leeds; KU Leuven; University of St Andrews; University of Limerick; Flinders University; Trent University; Queen Margaret University; McMaster University; Nottingham Trent University; University of Oxford; University of South Florida; University of Dundee; Johns Hopkins University; Lehigh University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Universitetet i Oslo; University of Exeter; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02279502943043251,"score_gpt":0.3397414397859367,"score_spread":0.3169464103555042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406928270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026523604,0.00036755556,0.0007512373,0.0019439212,0.005971973,0.00033825013,0.03440702,0.0038646255,0.9520902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006696212,0.00022574718,0.00037796653,0.00070708356,0.00080700824,0.00010483242,0.009589216,0.0009208706,0.9865976],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992737,0.000074971715,0.000041851592,0.00011327551,0.00039828988,0.000097875025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970421,0.00045533144,0.00012751338,0.00030311832,0.0011783129,0.0008935206],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009834296,0.0016071108,0.001399857,0.004559978,0.001188305,0.0049377717,0.0017265306,0.003048087,0.9614171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059906337,0.00054283085,0.0009963234,0.0039700666,0.0004678069,0.0025661478,0.002364291,0.0014003824,0.9083812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019829658,0.000022806391,0.000050281236,0.00011857176,0.0000016642657,0.0000150906735,0.0000077192435,0.000034074557,0.00007606554,0.000608814,0.9701036,0.028941369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002605209,0.000019761614,0.00036432073,0.00007149136,0.0000026073078,0.000019681529,0.000021006015,0.00005774168,0.00007368228,0.0009868697,0.9983504,0.0000063531206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023523297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051972046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03858292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082009385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016697994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055033743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408161838","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12871","title":"Examining the connection between position‐based power and social status across 70 cultures","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"National Research University Higher School of Economics; Narodowe Centrum Nauki; Hungarian Scientific Research Fund; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; European Commission","keywords":"Social psychology; Connection (principal bundle); Psychology; Position (finance); Power (physics); Social status; Social position; Social power; Social relation; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08204655135146,"score_gpt":0.4353853574486395,"score_spread":0.3533388060971795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408161838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992212,0.000036745652,0.000037926475,0.000012554111,0.0000018303814,0.000005461592,0.000066878194,3.620578e-7,0.0006170278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997224,0.000041879648,0.00005058254,0.00000679439,0.0000018678177,0.000010579526,0.00007355436,7.6119505e-7,0.00009143169],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989936,0.000431258,0.00010039483,0.00013867283,0.000194018,0.0001421357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952355,0.0020258431,0.0010833179,0.00033266863,0.00079662155,0.0005259856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018227146,0.00016790439,0.00033208277,0.0011757879,0.00076247624,0.0011864111,0.00022554208,0.00027504144,0.0015221925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00593024,0.00017536692,0.00019959263,0.0010900005,0.0009140413,0.00054787786,0.0012977583,0.0004173456,0.00017353338],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006658698,0.000063584295,0.98114014,0.000034512865,0.000091823014,0.00004121512,0.011718812,0.00007352331,0.00046685818,0.00033786712,0.00014239034,0.0058226995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037795078,0.00004789495,0.9883812,0.000012136389,0.000017928418,0.000029402841,0.010741532,0.00018042196,0.000103412465,0.00012215426,0.00035313287,0.0000069187477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012852532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017961666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012852532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004562289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035802665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025555432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408528613","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12849","title":"A wolf in sheep's clothing? The interplay of perceived threat and social norms in hierarchy‐maintaining action tendencies towards disadvantaged groups","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation; Tel Aviv University; Minerva Foundation","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Social psychology; Hierarchy; Psychology; Autonomy; Action (physics); Power (physics); Perception; Political science","score_opus":0.02549626382841616,"score_gpt":0.3944687537633482,"score_spread":0.36897248993493204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408528613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99850273,0.000040072624,0.00004830253,0.0001595741,0.000004846053,0.0000010413166,0.0000023935133,6.645342e-7,0.0012402695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996044,0.000029441188,0.00005076135,0.000044508233,0.0000027505178,9.63861e-7,0.0000027334004,8.155272e-7,0.00026357596],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961936,0.0001961268,0.000014720442,0.000040431427,0.000079104364,0.00005015593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826884,0.0005217787,0.0007524853,0.00007482665,0.0001222098,0.00025987026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010415327,0.00011397078,0.00012072801,0.00025959942,0.00051160256,0.0010181512,0.00014114812,0.00038295795,0.002378574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043779737,0.00011388431,0.00010207973,0.00009980157,0.0013851904,0.00052838546,0.0003700377,0.00043289343,0.00019379251],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000278243,0.00036360658,0.9090925,0.000070363996,0.00007918453,0.00065841805,0.055350684,0.0000988028,0.0057424554,0.0021027625,0.0007808632,0.025382172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008304115,0.00023999497,0.9233047,0.000054473665,0.000018886773,0.00049623824,0.07217091,0.00029662796,0.0003729109,0.0011045287,0.0019138594,0.000018547913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002483988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049786777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002483988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019338827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017461575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0079571605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409958707","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12891","title":"‘Nothing to lose or a world to win’: Reconsidering efficacy, legitimacy, political trust and repression in confrontational collective action","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health","keywords":"Legitimacy; Collective action; Social psychology; Politics; Collective responsibility; Psychology; Nothing; System justification; Political science; Law; Ideology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09404237997619981,"score_gpt":0.4582367235062856,"score_spread":0.3641943435300858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409958707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977385,0.00007867658,0.00013783581,0.00019404608,0.000004911171,0.000003897603,0.0000029978899,6.3547964e-7,0.0018385418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99987435,0.000014766454,0.000027608134,0.000011980349,0.00000223288,0.0000019624754,0.00000305615,5.169293e-7,0.00006352242],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968635,0.0019969046,0.00012031877,0.0002446277,0.0004427929,0.00033198524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843205,0.008974108,0.004163846,0.00095189526,0.0005644242,0.0010252281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053048055,0.0002671324,0.00036500234,0.0009227532,0.000989165,0.0022277345,0.0004784911,0.00066825637,0.0018223086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017170865,0.00027044694,0.00027520958,0.00047765984,0.0060361447,0.001972116,0.0017879376,0.0016636628,0.00013206805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041027658,0.000774597,0.9148457,0.0000817441,0.00016685229,0.00046021334,0.051460657,0.00049151486,0.0013916211,0.007774578,0.0002367418,0.021905463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011265136,0.00017938476,0.9729423,0.000037826056,0.00003769839,0.000166754,0.021776343,0.0012325343,0.00026249103,0.0027666248,0.00056328875,0.00002355654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004669684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057769264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053048055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009850148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007722144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028054774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409958718","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12765","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Holloway, University of London; University of Massachusetts Amherst; Universität Innsbruck; Peking University; Université de Lausanne; Universidade de Lisboa; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Tel Aviv University; Simon Fraser University; Sapienza Università di Roma; University of Hong Kong; Universiteit Gent; Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca; Western Sydney University; Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Miami; Durham University; Cardiff University; University of Sussex; University of Leeds; KU Leuven; University of St Andrews; University of Limerick; Flinders University; Trent University; Queen Margaret University; McMaster University; Nottingham Trent University; University of Oxford; University of South Florida; University of Dundee; Johns Hopkins University; Lehigh University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Universitetet i Oslo; University of Exeter; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.029351528500323888,"score_gpt":0.27909383875391763,"score_spread":0.24974231025359375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409958718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020979086,0.0005372859,0.00046109885,0.0025313937,0.008665916,0.00026847172,0.050585587,0.0026561639,0.93408436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00070503383,0.00025899246,0.00019913529,0.0007815479,0.0009323805,0.000099756464,0.012723031,0.0007126904,0.98358744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896014,0.000104287916,0.00005904187,0.00015687977,0.0005751151,0.00014458234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997248,0.00038367935,0.00013486046,0.0002917902,0.001137288,0.00080432504],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096679066,0.0017253065,0.001619789,0.004522177,0.0013411134,0.006095878,0.0019539087,0.0030478379,0.9482011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059109824,0.00053661055,0.0009984286,0.004303472,0.000526991,0.0026965288,0.0023974858,0.0017800039,0.9118813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001730279,0.000013557642,0.000025736521,0.00009619343,0.0000013501019,0.000008673912,0.000004275363,0.000034017467,0.000038846276,0.00062005146,0.9851622,0.01397784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022499262,0.000013626646,0.0002242479,0.00006772957,0.0000017608924,0.000008874235,0.00001305486,0.000056485456,0.000052038973,0.0010163055,0.9985184,0.000004960938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038821152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071731964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05179888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001397623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002221825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073884845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410377857","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12900","title":"Primary and secondary generalization effects from Black and gay contact: Longitudinal evidence of between‐ and within‐person effects","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Outgroup; Prejudice (legal term); Ingroups and outgroups; Social psychology; Contact hypothesis; Contact theory; Generalization; Social contact; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.031928768530556415,"score_gpt":0.3598059743540418,"score_spread":0.3278772058234854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410377857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99797446,0.00022586032,0.0004670195,0.00009794429,0.000014315887,0.000024166577,0.0002515642,0.000014132623,0.00093056523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986356,0.00005041651,0.00019827308,0.000030204661,0.000007863518,0.00002996872,0.00023552762,0.000007651054,0.0008045586],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975413,0.0008811068,0.0001310463,0.0006405685,0.0005558773,0.00025006724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847473,0.004564827,0.0036057052,0.0040052505,0.0014251404,0.0016518759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047469498,0.0003002337,0.0005551333,0.00072892517,0.0012966249,0.0011077742,0.00069327076,0.0010196038,0.004829181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015526765,0.00048052688,0.0008671069,0.00068701326,0.0007683508,0.0011621497,0.0017394628,0.0023016625,0.0007009155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068048574,0.0007327044,0.9731084,0.000052296273,0.00029797223,0.00012885529,0.007898693,0.00020567702,0.0023249649,0.00050206744,0.00060524984,0.013462605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004066867,0.00016975746,0.9979519,0.000016972062,0.00003377668,0.000036817146,0.00074680784,0.00021098451,0.00027293034,0.00015246245,0.00039216565,0.000011393026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010457109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01617129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010457109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043424123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005663659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025104523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410750696","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12901","title":"Majority friendship and support for social change: Examining the role of ethnic and politicized identifications among Indigenous people in Chile","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University Belfast; Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo; Centro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión Social; Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias; Queen's University; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Friendship; Ethnic group; Indigenous; Psychology; Social psychology; Social support; Social change; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04547192693825104,"score_gpt":0.392410611685461,"score_spread":0.34693868474720996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410750696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99954826,0.00006031286,0.000011754781,0.00006449685,0.0000012166952,0.000001842452,0.000018869858,3.9560553e-7,0.00029285284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997454,0.00003952163,0.000014561509,0.000008085037,0.0000018333025,0.000002924629,0.000018272029,3.5939442e-7,0.00016907063],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964726,0.00012041175,0.000013734893,0.000054948745,0.000039385654,0.00012427763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985905,0.00031933805,0.00050785777,0.000099464596,0.00012322799,0.0003596312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009666401,0.00016126431,0.00023204678,0.0006040904,0.0010092898,0.0007783882,0.0003828981,0.00034067722,0.0021123076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026470856,0.00015082174,0.0003055417,0.0004995231,0.000757477,0.0008625243,0.0017990454,0.0006321146,0.0001379662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007887926,0.00012777008,0.97178835,0.000032329965,0.000040928968,0.00012901977,0.021415286,0.000056839366,0.00028177447,0.0001822965,0.00009257731,0.0057738977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017208167,0.00003068608,0.987599,0.000013843176,0.000009624829,0.000019288791,0.0119346855,0.00009005612,0.000037754384,0.0000493463,0.00021040603,0.0000034920376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07082259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10352137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07082259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010902606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008680401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14082074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412838864","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12766","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Holloway, University of London; University of Massachusetts Amherst; Universität Innsbruck; Peking University; Université de Lausanne; Universidade de Lisboa; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Tel Aviv University; Simon Fraser University; Sapienza Università di Roma; University of Hong Kong; Universiteit Gent; Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca; Western Sydney University; Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Miami; Durham University; Cardiff University; University of Sussex; University of Leeds; KU Leuven; University of St Andrews; University of Limerick; Flinders University; Trent University; Queen Margaret University; McMaster University; Nottingham Trent University; University of Oxford; University of South Florida; University of Dundee; Johns Hopkins University; Lehigh University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Universitetet i Oslo; University of Exeter; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.029351528500323888,"score_gpt":0.27909383875391763,"score_spread":0.24974231025359375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412838864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020979086,0.0005372859,0.00046109885,0.0025313937,0.008665916,0.00026847172,0.050585587,0.0026561639,0.93408436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00070503383,0.00025899246,0.00019913529,0.0007815479,0.0009323805,0.000099756464,0.012723031,0.0007126904,0.98358744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896014,0.000104287916,0.00005904187,0.00015687977,0.0005751151,0.00014458234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997248,0.00038367935,0.00013486046,0.0002917902,0.001137288,0.00080432504],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096679066,0.0017253065,0.001619789,0.004522177,0.0013411134,0.006095878,0.0019539087,0.0030478379,0.9482011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059109824,0.00053661055,0.0009984286,0.004303472,0.000526991,0.0026965288,0.0023974858,0.0017800039,0.9118813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001730279,0.000013557642,0.000025736521,0.00009619343,0.0000013501019,0.000008673912,0.000004275363,0.000034017467,0.000038846276,0.00062005146,0.9851622,0.01397784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022499262,0.000013626646,0.0002242479,0.00006772957,0.0000017608924,0.000008874235,0.00001305486,0.000056485456,0.000052038973,0.0010163055,0.9985184,0.000004960938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038821152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071731964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05179888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001397623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002221825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073884845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416095877","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70018","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Holloway, University of London; University of Massachusetts Amherst; Universität Innsbruck; Peking University; Université de Lausanne; Universidade de Lisboa; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Tel Aviv University; Simon Fraser University; Sapienza Università di Roma; University of Hong Kong; Universiteit Gent; Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca; Western Sydney University; Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Miami; Durham University; Cardiff University; University of Sussex; University of Leeds; KU Leuven; University of St Andrews; University of Limerick; Flinders University; Trent University; Queen Margaret University; McMaster University; Nottingham Trent University; University of Oxford; University of South Florida; University of Dundee; Johns Hopkins University; Lehigh University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Universitetet i Oslo; University of Exeter; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"","score_opus":0.01932926962333846,"score_gpt":0.336730928336579,"score_spread":0.31740165871324055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416095877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002689101,0.00037993936,0.00074526767,0.0019317007,0.006051401,0.00033020502,0.031438492,0.003586749,0.95526737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00066571584,0.00022079429,0.00035454665,0.00066537404,0.00077725557,0.00009630089,0.0085382415,0.0008253408,0.9878565],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992835,0.00007486827,0.00004102975,0.000111943016,0.00039344392,0.000095214884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970921,0.00044738583,0.0001256683,0.0002927306,0.0011557466,0.0008864028],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009815258,0.0015673006,0.0013394547,0.004414711,0.0011574577,0.0048825904,0.0016774439,0.0030077714,0.96056485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005928129,0.0005246371,0.0009645554,0.0037621185,0.00046129507,0.0024758948,0.0022837634,0.0013678318,0.90479183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020740921,0.00002287805,0.000050891915,0.000118469405,0.0000016585767,0.00001555211,0.000007876662,0.00003407467,0.00007792669,0.0006346604,0.96904904,0.029966196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002565785,0.000020383857,0.00036688684,0.000071721755,0.0000025933164,0.00002058346,0.000021319724,0.00005887379,0.00007489636,0.000992024,0.9983388,0.000006129748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002304384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005138814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03943515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081557926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001631806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05624938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}