{"meta":{"query_hash":"230c109e8786","filters":{"venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology"},"cohort_total":112,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":112,"exported":112,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/230c109e8786","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=British+Journal+of+Social+Psychology"},"results":[{"id":"W1543531153","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02066.x","title":"The effects of third‐party validation and minimization on judgments of the transgressor and the third party","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Forgiveness; Third party; Psychology; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Marine transgression; Interpersonal relationship; Internet privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.02170307519233988,"score_gpt":0.3003767800417694,"score_spread":0.2786737048494295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543531153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99218243,0.001965869,0.000033874672,0.0008552714,0.0017941272,0.0002916373,0.000009683128,0.0000036026993,0.0028635177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981386,0.001384118,0.000014874244,0.00018596557,0.000080021906,0.0000090732365,9.1857623e-7,0.000011910057,0.00017449292],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830925,0.00071980024,0.00049929804,0.00012720392,0.00018558135,0.0001588816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987727,0.00026085222,0.000689775,0.0001235505,0.00012051052,0.000032654225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007014089,0.000097079275,0.00028564254,0.00003765049,0.00029494514,0.000016475957,0.0002306728,0.0002263772,0.00004193313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076215605,0.000055119996,0.00013937058,0.00011939701,0.0009502894,0.000056410892,0.000016860182,0.00037240313,0.0000011520964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022122338,0.0058954223,0.100594535,0.0005012637,0.0041992725,0.00031858965,0.1566861,0.0000122648535,0.014273426,0.07022899,0.0719786,0.5531892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007840737,0.0006500489,0.98117334,0.00023008227,0.0003637685,0.00047966166,0.0010211135,0.0000013434117,0.0018962758,0.0053081196,0.0009252674,0.00011022429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000069679336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018404533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8805788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007229518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015832788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3501381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564384134","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12121","title":"Unfreezing cognitions during an intractable conflict: Does an external incentive for negotiating peace and (low levels of) collective angst increase information seeking?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological and Educational Research Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Negotiation; Psychology; Social psychology; Incentive; Conflict resolution; Cognition; Political science","score_opus":0.08189680887116195,"score_gpt":0.4079265587718267,"score_spread":0.32602974990066474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564384134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99185824,0.00072596705,0.0019150858,0.00036433167,0.00086483127,0.0003007087,0.0003519522,0.000014843219,0.0036040498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976146,0.00011256706,0.0009274808,0.00034368577,0.000777207,0.00004142548,0.000020754633,0.000012975175,0.00014928922],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980886,0.0003850421,0.00064919295,0.00020788732,0.00028285116,0.00038643874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972302,0.0003115587,0.00066480023,0.00007592398,0.0014349207,0.00028260163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011523839,0.00013787557,0.00037704772,0.00020507986,0.00046957462,0.0001249218,0.00021915212,0.00016986154,0.00012980451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010631812,0.00013596709,0.00007846788,0.00022659695,0.00040129782,0.0010405047,0.00004704975,0.0004228794,0.000003255033],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023018602,0.013440041,0.123787016,0.00058312505,0.003257075,0.0005808489,0.33632022,0.000085893975,0.042215027,0.015896529,0.052971352,0.3878443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052076858,0.0010156587,0.9575208,0.00012826339,0.000054373708,0.000897017,0.0261797,0.000027808766,0.000070091126,0.0075775986,0.0011065122,0.00021452435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029334784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048834947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83373374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098298464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001697172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5544577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566143469","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02032.x","title":"Testing the social identity relative deprivation (SIRD) model of social change: The political rise of Scottish nationalism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Relative deprivation; Nationalism; Psychology; Feeling; Social psychology; Identity (music); Politics; Social deprivation; Social identity theory; Structural equation modeling; Group identification; Social group; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.17307000494830668,"score_gpt":0.3939023909887717,"score_spread":0.22083238604046504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566143469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95243233,0.00069120293,0.0009176846,0.010745362,0.0010301385,0.0003510795,0.00006125615,0.000021195352,0.033749737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99533904,0.00007496578,0.0002692446,0.0008429939,0.0033909988,0.000010143892,0.0000021332762,0.000016554333,0.000053937256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969465,0.00092578965,0.0007497814,0.0001576569,0.0008003394,0.00041989397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997193,0.00037992853,0.001144985,0.000056237383,0.0011540863,0.00007179827],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023388732,0.00011644569,0.0003762544,0.000069421534,0.0017068578,0.000048343278,0.0006635788,0.00037303986,0.00011949425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010126681,0.000107845466,0.000327166,0.0005854795,0.0023878631,0.00063604297,0.000083177496,0.0006630555,0.0000027140409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010216038,0.00027401545,0.0026809205,0.000010999501,0.00014694827,0.000012034659,0.16282459,8.65962e-7,0.00014637613,0.80883014,0.0044884705,0.020482447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007251086,0.00008040793,0.51856387,0.00003834584,0.00012345352,0.000033601915,0.02096111,0.00002385634,0.000013354867,0.45897052,0.00031662948,0.00014973545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022841943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011865564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51588297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107557324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024256461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595625467","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12119","title":"An interactive activation and competition model of person knowledge, suggested by proactive interference by traits spontaneously inferred from behaviours","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Trait; Big Five personality traits; Personality; Social psychology; Competition (biology); Perception; Cognitive psychology; Categorical variable; Ecology; Computer science","score_opus":0.057127103880272694,"score_gpt":0.3717129819150437,"score_spread":0.314585878034771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595625467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894452,0.00029271626,0.0026746923,0.0008838758,0.0005290385,0.00017919758,0.00019733816,0.000020716703,0.005777243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989359,0.0001206579,0.00018485181,0.00023866321,0.00032861126,0.0000062820395,0.000052471114,0.000018054196,0.00011451689],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800736,0.0007703993,0.00044571178,0.00026405315,0.00025698106,0.00025549575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825346,0.00012063992,0.000632708,0.00005048325,0.0007303102,0.00021242241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053681026,0.00014265126,0.0004279752,0.000101787606,0.0002037182,0.000069697104,0.0003054348,0.00035715947,0.000082423234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002073091,0.00017833117,0.00009213853,0.00016852698,0.0006937859,0.00070604996,0.00001688935,0.0005053435,0.0000019099264],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037852868,0.004744339,0.0025524977,0.00001050832,0.0004826202,0.0000806549,0.5041017,0.0000033781876,0.13377833,0.0023882515,0.0943775,0.25369495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026669659,0.01320418,0.34132916,0.0011536187,0.0007677512,0.0015615073,0.5274538,0.00049647654,0.006509839,0.06982529,0.008194337,0.0028344113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032052663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020215905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33877668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019434633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016819096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72721344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1610837822","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12118","title":"Finding death in meaninglessness: Evidence that death‐thought accessibility increases in response to meaning threats","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Psychology; Social psychology; Compensation (psychology); Epistemology; Psychotherapist; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1757928749597709,"score_gpt":0.4393048104198002,"score_spread":0.26351193546002927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1610837822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98434,0.0041007665,0.00041217182,0.0013496038,0.0012592716,0.00028587776,0.000010799602,0.000030015608,0.008211504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967052,0.00028545977,0.0006585571,0.0014020092,0.0006218419,0.00002107662,0.0000022325405,0.00004030622,0.00026334904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99444395,0.0026052417,0.001078304,0.0005574866,0.0005741812,0.00074086245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976641,0.0007370556,0.0006909845,0.00022920563,0.00030603673,0.0003726248],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007701124,0.0002543344,0.00083864055,0.0004868484,0.00023141314,0.00012224632,0.00077231834,0.00052824983,0.00023927164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033722462,0.00031080729,0.00021568284,0.0009065447,0.00013219763,0.000643603,0.00018369361,0.0010402527,0.00004851839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015136698,0.0014690751,0.811566,0.000026817428,0.00008650408,0.008673835,0.03542425,0.000021015549,0.00052275823,0.0026171715,0.0041124355,0.120343454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034224626,0.00041882438,0.97523355,0.0006769922,0.0000264612,0.0012948535,0.005516338,0.000001519525,0.000013169888,0.011959905,0.0011298636,0.00030608033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015546451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001995742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16366754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000501046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028837155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1816408537","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02035.x","title":"Unpacking the hedonic paradox: A dynamic analysis of the relationships between financial capital, social capital and life satisfaction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Happiness; Social capital; Life satisfaction; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Economics; Perspective (graphical); Priming (agriculture); Positive economics; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.054691489474852924,"score_gpt":0.3254880064679856,"score_spread":0.2707965169931327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1816408537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922558,0.0009281956,0.0006541015,0.0013309008,0.0015170289,0.0001761742,0.00006204313,0.000019921097,0.0030558147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987093,0.00015142617,0.00005710563,0.00038060397,0.0005973076,0.00000854997,0.000005981745,0.000021786773,0.00006793898],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657387,0.0014147827,0.0009875849,0.00031986888,0.00032957192,0.00037434816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997985,0.00029929177,0.0012422954,0.00019530601,0.0001749044,0.00010320424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014299138,0.00019397208,0.000636592,0.00025403147,0.0009046425,0.000042275136,0.00036280023,0.00052509754,0.0005142188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034991626,0.00015950823,0.00053501566,0.0009095014,0.00076912,0.00014999797,0.00004806223,0.0014031861,0.000013016349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004785413,0.00035612166,0.8379018,0.000015357202,0.0033687525,0.00007015118,0.04546423,0.000005512772,0.00022771623,0.007982315,0.0074140276,0.09671548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093552365,0.00015916082,0.9833885,0.000018795388,0.0010008081,0.00025353447,0.0029107127,0.0000019322997,0.0000019025789,0.010936855,0.00023523615,0.00015705054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008225187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011742817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14548668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006335077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006514441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.695787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1847380670","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02014.x","title":"`Where the rubber hits the road’ en route to inter‐group harmony: Examining contact intentions and contact behaviour under meta‐stereotype threat","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Prejudice (legal term); Social psychology; Stereotype (UML); Stereotype threat; Ingroups and outgroups; Psychological intervention","score_opus":0.1251704605641402,"score_gpt":0.3726044854614676,"score_spread":0.24743402489732744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1847380670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92650646,0.0032202052,0.001033055,0.022961168,0.003988866,0.00051106757,0.00003234241,0.00004442435,0.041702427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902943,0.0009760831,0.0001361986,0.0067517213,0.0010641392,0.000030577765,0.0000015859107,0.000030184337,0.00071522343],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670136,0.0014561735,0.0006585847,0.0003067063,0.00036013275,0.0005170548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985767,0.0002757898,0.00046508963,0.00015841218,0.00033203315,0.0001919949],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021717695,0.00020895246,0.00055641733,0.00009392317,0.001092263,0.00022765236,0.0008580016,0.00031538654,0.0015411718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022371828,0.00015588247,0.0003665229,0.00027529948,0.00062279566,0.00033152907,0.00011893423,0.00086429005,0.00003266908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013395746,0.0015492106,0.09787534,0.000020123058,0.00749103,0.0007961867,0.31282696,2.2247794e-7,0.004390554,0.07761134,0.19620754,0.29989192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095496007,0.0006385081,0.93046224,0.000062058476,0.0006441796,0.0006242211,0.03376649,1.400305e-7,0.0000052013697,0.004732717,0.027883857,0.00022545205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004741104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012737213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8325869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010250288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073893716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1910650044","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02071.x","title":"Negative expectancies for the group's outcomes undermine normative collective action: Conflict between Christian and Muslim groups in Lebanon","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Normative; Injustice; Social psychology; Action (physics); Group identification; Ingroups and outgroups; Collective action; Social identity theory; Path analysis (statistics); Identification (biology); Just-world hypothesis; Group conflict; Normative social influence; Group (periodic table); Social group","score_opus":0.12759863733823384,"score_gpt":0.39278314221038146,"score_spread":0.2651845048721476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1910650044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9550113,0.0012412973,0.0022978343,0.010036129,0.0023285483,0.0008545018,0.00006263301,0.000031530188,0.02813623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99610436,0.0007591085,0.00023662846,0.0013399402,0.001171216,0.00004530154,0.0000016384139,0.000017008408,0.0003247982],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979438,0.0005874149,0.0006080764,0.00021926525,0.00022889268,0.00041251286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978408,0.0009647858,0.00057469454,0.00006070157,0.0004593913,0.00009958384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012297608,0.00015425577,0.0005397848,0.00014258227,0.00097516726,0.00006442991,0.00035711972,0.0002932045,0.00017008847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007783324,0.00014526398,0.00018541362,0.00043645644,0.0013904661,0.00034301018,0.000031613894,0.0004947023,0.0000028078052],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009450552,0.0005245743,0.059799533,0.000019359288,0.0008760326,0.00013914857,0.7838948,1.1712583e-7,0.00012611988,0.010374165,0.048369482,0.09493161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002086465,0.00042608078,0.82178485,0.000028600289,0.000050355284,0.000074513126,0.1530901,3.079583e-7,0.00001039485,0.016977383,0.0053176973,0.0001532471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024218096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008159768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7619853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018657697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117586176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7500297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1955788977","doi":"10.1348/014466610x519683","title":"Facing social identity change: Interactive effects of current and projected collective identification on expectations regarding future self‐esteem and psychological well‐being","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Valence (chemistry); Social identity theory; Salient; Social psychology; Young adult; Self-esteem; Identification (biology); Developmental psychology; Identity (music); Ingroups and outgroups; Social group","score_opus":0.03858636700568184,"score_gpt":0.41020370269197365,"score_spread":0.3716173356862918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1955788977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882662,0.00032432267,0.00015089882,0.0017799716,0.0048370464,0.00043421573,0.0000074272143,0.000034525896,0.004165375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99570626,0.0005849399,0.0001324215,0.00024182128,0.003245961,0.000033415803,0.0000022838944,0.000015922124,0.00003695612],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976327,0.0008078389,0.00054988876,0.00034995613,0.00034196133,0.00031764913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981445,0.0002932288,0.000886486,0.000060935417,0.000509107,0.000105762694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007694414,0.0001562029,0.00046668365,0.0002547802,0.0010563167,0.00014763665,0.00024476292,0.00033544964,0.000031312487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005256013,0.00017995262,0.00015644131,0.0005292218,0.00082453224,0.0005992396,0.000041990854,0.0010637043,0.000003959356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010629687,0.0032759348,0.010322844,0.00014088544,0.00053908903,0.00016327109,0.5127334,2.9990368e-8,0.025820643,0.04284769,0.014350788,0.38874245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00236052,0.000826295,0.94859564,0.00014455928,0.00011890691,0.0002641995,0.0288284,0.0000010888796,0.00015085498,0.015279044,0.0031327193,0.00029779784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000093228475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007290503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9382728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000963548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005312722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8124441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964520967","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12016","title":"Explaining dehumanization among children: The interspecies model of prejudice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":171,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dehumanization; Prejudice (legal term); Psychology; Social psychology; Outgroup; Social dominance orientation; Empathy; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04233264188457887,"score_gpt":0.351670697393817,"score_spread":0.30933805550923815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964520967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9501917,0.00095967617,0.0021098873,0.00169428,0.001663959,0.00012607177,0.0000062292916,0.000016247175,0.04323198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959304,0.00048862083,0.00017156261,0.0008155535,0.0023159396,0.0000033163808,0.0000015927059,0.000014866873,0.00025815202],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819475,0.00049427256,0.0005281304,0.000105657025,0.00030760476,0.00036956984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987307,0.00010012027,0.00067648327,0.000069183836,0.00033517784,0.00008828641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015083328,0.00008766108,0.00027585827,0.00008090063,0.00061843166,0.0000430887,0.00050032,0.00021404288,0.00028992153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003542452,0.00008795051,0.00018939997,0.0002512553,0.0011861289,0.00047903522,0.000039123275,0.0003950987,0.000006450749],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025469574,0.0011690737,0.20118597,0.000012187936,0.0005875214,0.00001426438,0.4094204,0.00003142755,0.001634894,0.12326388,0.1856786,0.0767471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010304777,0.00016063305,0.95223254,0.00007083237,0.00008246457,0.00018619894,0.033044692,0.0000071879517,0.000031817435,0.007542645,0.005394193,0.00021630031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031003868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003523665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7510466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058207712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005144902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4756539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965056477","doi":"10.1348/014466603763276171","title":"Happy mood decreases self‐focused attention","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mood; Psychology; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.05432302538751395,"score_gpt":0.41108383234474716,"score_spread":0.3567608069572332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965056477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9510031,0.0018436427,0.0012420563,0.0009376678,0.004181379,0.00017539696,0.000028248149,0.000051388804,0.040537175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99614644,0.00012857569,0.0013103586,0.0007875573,0.00053075165,0.00001440499,0.000005669163,0.000030654413,0.0010455945],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783754,0.0004726115,0.00083215995,0.00022062386,0.00019448489,0.00044260468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987888,0.00004680028,0.0005373159,0.000119416974,0.0002807878,0.00022690788],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069444353,0.00013043784,0.00035085547,0.00015212638,0.00027325828,0.00004324087,0.00022476132,0.00029900516,0.0049118404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009848356,0.00016357013,0.00041222697,0.00023593611,0.00012549579,0.00015497071,0.000009785906,0.0005334974,0.00018991975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063565536,0.012266007,0.029799003,0.000040026654,0.0006370101,0.0013390123,0.0018564425,3.1550792e-7,0.0016893324,0.053293183,0.48581722,0.4126268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004427572,0.00087226066,0.87596613,0.00010115978,0.00012976311,0.008794923,0.00059743813,1.787187e-7,0.000015261687,0.0012890573,0.10758344,0.00022283799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010266147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008540755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8461671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055313863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059411817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973103433","doi":"10.1348/0144666041501660","title":"Procrastination and counterfactual thinking: Avoiding what might have been","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual conditional; Counterfactual thinking; Procrastination; Psychology; Anxiety; Social psychology; Mood; Trait; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.024448006606259547,"score_gpt":0.3348941652023441,"score_spread":0.31044615859608454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973103433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9696874,0.0075547225,0.006358686,0.007184603,0.003417085,0.00026127818,0.000010808206,0.00006473918,0.005460692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951819,0.0013964376,0.0004252886,0.0011417511,0.0014114125,0.000012384266,0.000004583133,0.000033864915,0.00039236766],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981284,0.00023768294,0.00061352924,0.00031894105,0.00033553835,0.00036589327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998623,0.00011517184,0.00058719097,0.000072128445,0.0005175743,0.00008493156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010131162,0.00018132015,0.00037948732,0.00018205312,0.0010132933,0.00027473556,0.00021929681,0.0002581192,0.00016695714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023458124,0.00022335463,0.00011933521,0.00016707012,0.000350032,0.0007775156,0.00004459706,0.0007414341,0.000026572872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013487714,0.0031376607,0.036836796,0.00019227405,0.0023153722,0.0018597301,0.2535635,0.000040270646,0.004130518,0.017555349,0.09853212,0.58048767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008460151,0.0010424851,0.87339896,0.00043134784,0.00018231242,0.02017186,0.033702556,0.0000019193847,0.00016110577,0.042287644,0.019584002,0.000575643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007129215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014639145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83656216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015344334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060139293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9108137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980785808","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12083","title":"Tapping generalized essentialism to predict outgroup prejudices","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Essentialism; Prejudice (legal term); Psychology; Outgroup; Social psychology; Perception; Unitary state; Power (physics); Covariance; Sociology; Mathematics; Gender studies; Statistics","score_opus":0.025891953786464566,"score_gpt":0.36879394391130466,"score_spread":0.3429019901248401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980785808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80613977,0.00054725294,0.007461619,0.022555282,0.010727272,0.00031773045,0.000014129859,0.00009961352,0.15213735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98047054,0.000371552,0.0009044871,0.008479772,0.008688287,0.000011312724,0.000002917821,0.000029689698,0.0010414483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996713,0.0011121143,0.0007566205,0.0003021308,0.0005066882,0.00060943764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984945,0.00012566464,0.00053948787,0.00010714203,0.0004237322,0.00030948417],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019370461,0.0001509556,0.00053996296,0.00018588052,0.00082720176,0.0001659106,0.000752845,0.00038185556,0.0010414191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007181348,0.0001890818,0.0003127989,0.0004262273,0.0005516062,0.00028050918,0.000054988814,0.00046248705,0.00007830424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038937695,0.000572388,0.00327244,0.000017813461,0.0003648887,0.00020262467,0.03599431,0.0000042902475,0.0053046728,0.045596812,0.56616503,0.34211537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022286475,0.00042323748,0.08906883,0.000087619526,0.00006569851,0.0002917292,0.0026998888,0.0000019411298,0.000022570875,0.018630294,0.88613355,0.00034600732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012068538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011332528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34176937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007881256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000829845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990901248","doi":"10.1348/014466601164696","title":"Social identification and gender‐related ideology in women and men","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Psychological Association","keywords":"Ideology; Centrality; Psychology; Gender role; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Social identity theory; Disadvantage; System justification; Identification (biology); Perception; Cognition; Identity (music); Social group; Social cognition; Developmental psychology; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.03697890183802935,"score_gpt":0.38054926456178,"score_spread":0.34357036272375063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990901248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.955225,0.0010770924,0.000039044422,0.010159956,0.0006248874,0.00010892801,0.000002382169,0.000016631742,0.032746103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941145,0.0033926396,0.000022003826,0.0011340796,0.0007319928,0.000007972833,0.0000012270737,0.000013068022,0.00058249064],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977148,0.0007506602,0.00064635207,0.0002386368,0.00019521263,0.00045431464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992043,0.00008449641,0.00040581744,0.000037965157,0.00014919933,0.000118247386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018586394,0.00010155665,0.0003767606,0.00018868306,0.0005367405,0.00007454541,0.00021467182,0.0004463751,0.0003178895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020581365,0.00013428295,0.00006652846,0.0003482827,0.0010891253,0.00027007188,0.000034038458,0.00046296272,0.000008591427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069589337,0.0005928224,0.06316001,0.000019270792,0.00026951148,0.00097249134,0.29829007,1.8140254e-7,0.002459197,0.043009926,0.048808813,0.5417218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016990296,0.00009453655,0.82122386,0.0000072672074,0.000012523945,0.0008069958,0.011653068,6.06839e-7,5.775249e-7,0.14237417,0.021993704,0.00013368651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035227148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050382654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75806385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011846518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056772118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54758996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992638630","doi":"10.1348/014466608x324367","title":"Emotional reactions of anger and shame to the norm violation characterizing episodes of interpersonal harm","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Harm; Psychology; Blame; Anger; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Generalizability theory; Norm (philosophy); Attribution; Structural equation modeling; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.06014358544245028,"score_gpt":0.3604139539940565,"score_spread":0.3002703685516062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992638630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939281,0.00026825792,0.0005752955,0.0026981444,0.00084735063,0.00009899147,0.000074771655,0.000004887164,0.0015042472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809355,0.00013932506,0.00050191686,0.00047664193,0.00045934514,0.000004637521,0.000006794262,0.000011787443,0.00030602005],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988755,0.000138882,0.0005557754,0.00012913327,0.00015088849,0.00014980989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990826,0.000055614222,0.00045388786,0.00007382775,0.00027468603,0.00005938509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035419263,0.00007847049,0.00026148855,0.00013945383,0.00017613707,0.000009028136,0.00013968437,0.00011916847,0.0007064981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044931887,0.00007776045,0.00013863422,0.00016394138,0.00026012168,0.00011582447,0.000023220186,0.00029167338,0.000008861127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015895608,0.004846848,0.18812567,0.00008437338,0.00092441135,0.0006557853,0.044938628,0.000005424037,0.1684406,0.011855786,0.112780936,0.46575198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000611725,0.0002544269,0.98897713,0.00006939615,0.000031235944,0.004454939,0.0006102143,6.754452e-7,0.000064146596,0.00014505348,0.004715046,0.00006603389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011632401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003207953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80085146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020103531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025636937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7735659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994294430","doi":"10.1348/014466607x248903","title":"Distinguishing among perceived control, perceived difficulty, and self‐efficacy as determinants of intentions and behaviours","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; CLARITY; Perception; Control (management); Cognition; Empirical research; Perceived control; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.04756895825979877,"score_gpt":0.39195815927693933,"score_spread":0.34438920101714054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994294430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965046,0.0009329273,0.00002520922,0.00019881033,0.00080008694,0.00020684453,0.00006508957,0.00002266029,0.0012437768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987327,0.00048654558,0.00015325613,0.00017965541,0.00020878874,0.000007852141,0.0000047842846,0.000025500045,0.000200947],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978557,0.00035593024,0.0009400469,0.00026679732,0.00020709544,0.0003744334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984979,0.0000946252,0.00068161613,0.00009940416,0.00037657673,0.0002498558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038726092,0.00015942799,0.0005809854,0.00014999774,0.00048159016,0.00003467601,0.00019875262,0.0002793265,0.0003650264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018426035,0.00018432649,0.00025055817,0.00011361602,0.00077914755,0.000177202,0.000036195124,0.0006017926,0.000004646182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049116515,0.0052752374,0.8461586,0.00004468612,0.00022505173,0.0035334984,0.015971376,1.518122e-7,0.0012748757,0.00022078518,0.0093021095,0.11750245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003916676,0.0007795119,0.98154783,0.00017542252,0.00016133495,0.0120310765,0.0010243576,0.0000019630784,0.0000014255317,0.000052075564,0.00016035567,0.00014795153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010308707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047852373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13538924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030936633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004381806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7516616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000158296","doi":"10.1348/014466607x269829","title":"The protest intentions of skilled immigrants with credentialing problems: A test of a model integrating relative deprivation theory with social identity theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Relative deprivation; Social psychology; Psychology; Blame; Social identity theory; Attribution; Identity (music); Immigration; Structural equation modeling; Social group; Political science","score_opus":0.03392365814117535,"score_gpt":0.3403387781924204,"score_spread":0.30641512005124505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000158296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9364861,0.0003999441,0.047591146,0.0011647345,0.00032632335,0.0005739581,0.000024176394,0.000024600706,0.013408981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977809,0.00033441605,0.0010707479,0.00012015176,0.0003620291,0.000028729659,0.0000023156879,0.000024492583,0.0002761739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966744,0.0011288731,0.00093702,0.00021932898,0.0006764242,0.00036395268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996194,0.0006180899,0.0017877546,0.0000907864,0.0012446975,0.000064651336],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003113317,0.00015672184,0.00050726125,0.00013667703,0.0018923634,0.000053673328,0.0005575843,0.00025363092,0.000041109717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014992857,0.00012628351,0.00026301754,0.0006404933,0.003340003,0.0006475716,0.00004015939,0.0006651551,0.0000010335707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037972457,0.002676577,0.033072192,0.0000712534,0.0016160919,0.00015430259,0.32318184,0.000034301596,0.011681742,0.5811585,0.0019641253,0.040591843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006589054,0.0020064318,0.29773122,0.0009792043,0.00040827823,0.0010922259,0.11049746,0.000028463248,0.0001485756,0.5796438,0.0003071824,0.0005681025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056648266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006625138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26465902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008384689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003466196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004274817","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12092","title":"The psychological disengagement model among women in science, engineering, and technology","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique; University of Ottawa; Université de Moncton","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Disengagement theory; Outgroup; Psychology; Discounting; Social psychology; Psychological science; Self-esteem; Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology; Gerontology","score_opus":0.015320708407680309,"score_gpt":0.333371320733288,"score_spread":0.3180506123256077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004274817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97614264,0.00026262912,0.00020108615,0.0056731366,0.0010442028,0.00011393669,0.000001022498,0.000027986029,0.016533367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978611,0.00073666056,0.00017085297,0.00049329555,0.00046804725,0.000018544295,1.2731195e-7,0.000011081109,0.00024030541],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977597,0.00030920815,0.00050122436,0.0002696698,0.00034285133,0.00081736967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990875,0.0001432366,0.00026120068,0.000101438,0.00021945701,0.00018717766],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005592809,0.00010934543,0.00031304412,0.0003019551,0.0010844017,0.00014291405,0.0007685712,0.0002817506,0.000046281933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001417065,0.00010317773,0.000064706684,0.0008909372,0.0037968885,0.00021615518,0.00007976562,0.0007613805,0.000004098195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022941717,0.0008478945,0.050646223,0.000008951268,0.000096720585,0.00017553076,0.032151606,0.000032277243,0.0022615534,0.3734494,0.019198582,0.52090186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024479066,0.0005871483,0.78140575,0.000050858715,0.000014203208,0.00024150887,0.010945075,0.00027060395,0.000005138416,0.12108226,0.08258013,0.00036942505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049726856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028824713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7307595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016868679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007081824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012439665","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12004","title":"Why and how are you attached to your <scp>S</scp> ocial <scp>G</scp> roup? Investigating different forms of social identification","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social identity theory; Psychology; Social psychology; Social identity approach; CLARITY; Social group; Identity (music); Collective identity; Ingroups and outgroups; Identification (biology); In-group favoritism","score_opus":0.05966268511319917,"score_gpt":0.36264791163570304,"score_spread":0.30298522652250387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012439665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97899854,0.00085026043,0.0005896441,0.009252664,0.0032424422,0.00034704042,0.000057476944,0.000045754106,0.006616198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989946,0.00018365405,0.00017018648,0.002822342,0.0060102195,0.00002322831,0.000012423511,0.000050294802,0.0007816562],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589735,0.00085515215,0.0010018897,0.00040308718,0.0007882968,0.001054225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964454,0.00043488806,0.0018556359,0.00011956303,0.0006278393,0.0005166705],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021576693,0.00030088527,0.00091604097,0.00027527026,0.0012712169,0.00025405397,0.0006724561,0.0007627794,0.000044370594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036406287,0.00034857108,0.00041025758,0.0006053977,0.0011810382,0.0008046392,0.0000974587,0.0008085761,0.000014975482],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045264274,0.0011833054,0.13444848,0.000084944695,0.00050602184,0.00004883752,0.22645135,3.1299444e-7,0.019769914,0.014524993,0.56497747,0.03795912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013768374,0.00021567095,0.8412461,0.00007137857,0.00011111512,0.00013860996,0.071882024,4.3236213e-7,0.00020656816,0.006547824,0.07808428,0.00011914181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022058659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008652607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7067976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018393822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086376516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017261494","doi":"10.1348/014466604x17452","title":"Bridging the intention–behaviour gap: The role of moral norm","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":369,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Moderation; Theory of planned behavior; Legal norm; Norm (philosophy); Social norms approach; Control (management); Epistemology","score_opus":0.061374692727518054,"score_gpt":0.4081453881527747,"score_spread":0.3467706954252566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017261494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96566486,0.004989501,0.00019716735,0.009753053,0.0020804685,0.00018964823,0.000038373913,0.000014822724,0.01707213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99596256,0.00010128584,0.00008200601,0.0014466045,0.0013340373,0.0000126646455,0.000003407866,0.000020222871,0.0010372363],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979424,0.00038167622,0.00092897116,0.00014803474,0.00022583076,0.0003730708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986534,0.000043226293,0.00072468084,0.00017158012,0.0003211542,0.000085942134],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009905489,0.00011032279,0.00028860243,0.000087606146,0.00036375874,0.000038132413,0.0005690679,0.000171798,0.0023977384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003484971,0.000088097564,0.00046108352,0.00021061675,0.000410073,0.00013644893,0.000040186384,0.00087078684,0.000088424094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015548499,0.000736599,0.023056831,0.0000032901837,0.0000838031,0.0000533154,0.0018751707,6.6385854e-7,0.00020117649,0.0052247704,0.0847359,0.883873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001216415,0.00032751836,0.95054203,0.000066381865,0.000106580286,0.0037865215,0.0029718892,0.0000033723186,0.000027188686,0.0017121059,0.039130487,0.00010951829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005632248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004321062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92748517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044489556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041931486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021207501","doi":"10.1348/014466604x17542","title":"Opposition to redistributive employment policies for women: The role of policy experience and group interest","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Opposition (politics); Affirmative action; Meritocracy; Social psychology; Interest group; Psychology; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.03304048331982808,"score_gpt":0.39947140085497274,"score_spread":0.3664309175351447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021207501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95711607,0.00041534848,0.00031967636,0.03416096,0.0004654961,0.0002425964,0.000052049527,0.00000943529,0.0072183716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99251145,0.00029350838,0.0001413746,0.0043098247,0.002550952,0.0000382575,0.0000014248141,0.00000890022,0.00014432371],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986421,0.00024082961,0.00043069277,0.00014285029,0.00016996764,0.00037356495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912184,0.000119500946,0.00031431825,0.000053680164,0.00025410744,0.00013655591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000731871,0.00008366102,0.00026074355,0.00009271416,0.0004859241,0.00005619192,0.00034940545,0.00014164094,0.000062316234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003682929,0.00008324636,0.00011241666,0.00023884687,0.0008181998,0.00016606243,0.00004248924,0.00017050424,0.0000021554765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057137146,0.00043225975,0.0010401958,0.0000052083037,0.00011566568,0.000006921389,0.29100677,2.961938e-7,0.009363983,0.10953616,0.024441795,0.56347936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012896525,0.0012977545,0.12569484,0.000056007782,0.00001843417,0.00020793802,0.13208866,3.8424145e-7,0.0002425983,0.047432754,0.6914735,0.00019751824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074187154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084672036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66703165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019873618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006443427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37373844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027127327","doi":"10.1348/014466604x23437","title":"Attitude change and the public–private attitude distinction","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Attitude change; Social psychology; Attitude","score_opus":0.06951888069193081,"score_gpt":0.37674566049381253,"score_spread":0.30722677980188173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027127327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68438053,0.0055113467,0.0006051791,0.2449586,0.005023805,0.00041038194,0.0000107604255,0.00006269422,0.059036717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806188,0.0032924097,0.0001656077,0.007379379,0.008151722,0.000015271504,0.0000013731,0.000014256004,0.00036119294],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783653,0.00078745687,0.00047227228,0.00018556131,0.00031568293,0.00040250577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899,0.0001410034,0.00042922137,0.000072988296,0.00023150916,0.00013527312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020798459,0.00010731185,0.00033996746,0.00007740436,0.0010759024,0.00017351356,0.00043408532,0.000250126,0.0005603836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037812177,0.00009967703,0.00018998435,0.00023947674,0.0019102143,0.0004662697,0.000050169678,0.0005055959,0.00003759254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038159336,0.00037949122,0.006617849,0.000006574542,0.00022096797,0.00009445251,0.021131638,6.38931e-8,0.00010007298,0.1734506,0.06145848,0.7361582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027899505,0.00008451818,0.2446486,0.000019172136,0.000036540518,0.0005453632,0.0012800548,7.6853314e-7,8.041573e-7,0.008797124,0.7416611,0.0001360359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035984645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030372508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7360222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079869475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039941126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.827508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029548332","doi":"10.1348/014466603763276162","title":"Investigating multiple components of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived control: An examination of the theory of planned behaviour in the exercise domain","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":556,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Psychology; Theory of planned behavior; Social norms approach; Population; Social psychology; Norm (philosophy); Variance (accounting); Controllability; Ambiguity; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Control (management)","score_opus":0.05213833266439986,"score_gpt":0.3658282401462758,"score_spread":0.3136899074818759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029548332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980164,0.00047491427,0.00003977948,0.00009297228,0.0003465106,0.00032111863,0.00007043371,0.0000020542454,0.00063580147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996276,0.000026322894,0.00013308,0.00013899857,0.000033453478,0.000010872828,0.000004407673,0.000010413012,0.000014878269],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639857,0.0022797233,0.0008226274,0.00012878804,0.0001873331,0.00018298873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985171,0.00019344784,0.0009010933,0.00011576724,0.00022179603,0.000050805127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002165321,0.00008970845,0.00038209275,0.00010540622,0.00011766935,0.000007217876,0.00026233983,0.00017003313,0.00007349681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013716453,0.00007644723,0.00013917973,0.00017509346,0.0005481959,0.00009853964,0.000011826017,0.00041068156,3.8502588e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076577795,0.003039023,0.9151793,0.000049257316,0.000079735524,0.00003911106,0.032951307,0.000001648162,0.008623389,0.0040842416,0.00026190345,0.034925304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038994816,0.00055347645,0.9819901,0.00020304238,0.00005494364,0.00026177792,0.01118849,6.9375824e-7,0.00003781286,0.0017444675,0.000009113768,0.000056624733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031845772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005012304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06681077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019670224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030144254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31174275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039335428","doi":"10.1348/014466607x258696","title":"Illusion of control by proxy: Placing one's fate in the hands of another","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Carleton University","funders":"Research Centre for the Humanities; Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre","keywords":"Illusion of control; Lottery; Luck; Psychology; Ticket; Social psychology; Illusion; Perception; Advertising; Roulette; Control (management); Cognitive psychology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.10838281614715406,"score_gpt":0.4001128352617986,"score_spread":0.2917300191146445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039335428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99596214,0.00032745762,0.00083682867,0.0007746849,0.00029871636,0.000091006674,0.00002716603,0.000002028911,0.001679989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989014,0.000121938,0.00016875667,0.0006091495,0.00011386774,0.0000010523395,4.5016242e-7,0.000008153642,0.00007521691],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742246,0.0003711968,0.001273756,0.00016717071,0.00059490796,0.00017049807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978256,0.0004943305,0.001182856,0.00013722644,0.00032977498,0.000030214953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032392382,0.00007826834,0.00054903433,0.00018891298,0.00012316582,0.000037582096,0.0006961385,0.00014851887,0.00019743666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005569408,0.00006310694,0.0002025981,0.00032475105,0.00035687262,0.00016938984,0.00002849764,0.00029675217,0.00000785349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073995924,0.0012242846,0.040843014,0.0000042961224,0.000043449672,0.0003682311,0.0054497067,0.000037692862,0.010730002,0.000072058894,0.069638364,0.87084895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018105993,0.002419036,0.8849676,0.00038277768,0.00007803162,0.0064629572,0.0034372462,0.00006284193,0.0006845966,0.059823543,0.023108512,0.0004668595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006325495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036092533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8703821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019700095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005806677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25734264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056864833","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12072","title":"The nature of professional and relational self‐aspects at the goal and narrative levels of personality","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of California, Riverside","keywords":"Narrative; Personality; Psychology; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Self; Big Five personality traits; Self-concept; Sociology; Social science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02726657682338127,"score_gpt":0.36484570453910836,"score_spread":0.33757912771572707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056864833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9678168,0.0046365857,0.000038547852,0.014995844,0.0014146833,0.00013945492,0.000109632885,0.0000051866386,0.010843253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683356,0.00012322688,0.00013276315,0.0015535788,0.00057941437,0.000004429053,0.0000031334441,0.0000135421815,0.00075633073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737,0.0011541343,0.0006437029,0.00024471025,0.0003276166,0.00025980626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774975,0.0008814459,0.0008352823,0.0001235563,0.00033208827,0.000077906436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021444352,0.00013936537,0.0004115684,0.000048418067,0.0006265673,0.000016189173,0.0002598777,0.0004440238,0.00063137925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017946638,0.00010064361,0.00014942708,0.00013173414,0.0015400173,0.00007164699,0.000058196703,0.0010097678,0.0000021874737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041986587,0.0018005419,0.054814048,0.00012579362,0.0025521654,0.00013996103,0.12495092,0.0000010021076,0.0039966563,0.45743123,0.21463877,0.13535026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019415076,0.0003088976,0.9545862,0.00003776332,0.000047067177,0.002932693,0.0025917666,0.0000011938507,0.0000071021755,0.0137142725,0.023735115,0.000096390686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002819741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014679588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89977217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022135424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061750776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.691316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057223659","doi":"10.1348/014466604x18532","title":"Talk about receiving, giving, and taking in radio interviews: doing modesty and making a virtue out of necessity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Active listening; Psychology; Social psychology; Irony; Epistemology; Communication","score_opus":0.05108253517345,"score_gpt":0.3583164804648258,"score_spread":0.30723394529137577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057223659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9445614,0.011421971,0.0002682641,0.00092161004,0.00027877203,0.00007687809,0.000012561204,0.0000122369875,0.042446256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970281,0.0011540963,0.00077759917,0.00034265182,0.0005263893,0.0000021182082,9.5314925e-7,0.000015473654,0.00015262939],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867785,0.0002627342,0.00061859103,0.00013730145,0.00012678775,0.00017674176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886096,0.00007682248,0.00081795466,0.000095857744,0.00011228847,0.00003611538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079528434,0.0001084991,0.00039182365,0.00013834423,0.00021636198,0.00021082118,0.00024698794,0.000083121275,0.0003052208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007008194,0.00012087796,0.00007350401,0.0000357449,0.00050177594,0.00052372855,0.00008291396,0.00043134828,9.2570883e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011374275,0.00038255844,0.0050733928,0.00017748983,0.00016851677,0.00022413794,0.22321324,0.000012411929,0.00065683573,0.030803123,0.002187423,0.7369871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00845105,0.0005542757,0.62822574,0.006421647,0.0002038282,0.0052027437,0.12869221,0.00022129524,0.000053745403,0.020883853,0.1997927,0.0012969421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019494157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00983224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7356902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032725024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029116112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.548662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057840240","doi":"10.1348/014466600164291","title":"Social categorization and stereotyping: ‘You mean I'm one of “them”?’","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV","keywords":"Categorization; Psychology; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Stereotype (UML); Social psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Social category; Social group; Social cognition; Cognitive bias; Social perception; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Perception; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05309695195803412,"score_gpt":0.3631273548293738,"score_spread":0.3100304028713397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057840240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8962218,0.0004131756,0.00013215578,0.005519473,0.00072339736,0.00011434719,0.000008947333,0.000021154927,0.09684553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99443924,0.0013799912,0.00013339786,0.0008057668,0.0021189402,0.0000020990556,0.0000029668274,0.000018091472,0.001099505],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798393,0.0005183696,0.0006419721,0.00019105783,0.0003283673,0.00033632954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999004,0.000055328648,0.00047993113,0.000048935548,0.00030875154,0.00010307058],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009409755,0.00010626144,0.0004459837,0.00008156365,0.00059436564,0.000054352953,0.00030458116,0.00035378133,0.0028246075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000871712,0.00013976975,0.000168824,0.00030681668,0.0010149961,0.0002460065,0.000016954971,0.0003501671,0.0000209134],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047293335,0.0007213757,0.0036213251,0.000022430799,0.00025728435,0.000071628754,0.07195372,1.9669851e-7,0.0014010969,0.033168618,0.026972538,0.8613368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006149137,0.00081872306,0.54464513,0.0001369942,0.00022832968,0.0008073146,0.017436353,0.0000013098798,0.000077012875,0.12428418,0.30469567,0.0007198334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061709067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042868388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86061704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050602066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008035413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066093734","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12030","title":"Priming motivation through unattended speech","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Priming (agriculture); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.03711276486174224,"score_gpt":0.33413460711939497,"score_spread":0.2970218422576527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066093734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89794296,0.00049944647,0.00060177007,0.0045241467,0.0018686992,0.0001476074,0.0000023744058,0.000033905715,0.09437909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922057,0.000062610714,0.0022148697,0.0029010845,0.0012032003,0.0000054562024,0.0000046769946,0.000027389271,0.0013750343],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984538,0.00019445326,0.00057840964,0.00022208266,0.00021918702,0.00033208408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906874,0.00007105435,0.00045778556,0.00007885371,0.0002572554,0.000066294044],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003698935,0.000119786695,0.00031045784,0.000082158156,0.00019930612,0.00006994088,0.00024315162,0.00020331187,0.0059390706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012727844,0.00013883633,0.00015210225,0.0001782135,0.00011941368,0.0002176404,0.000027631346,0.0006134813,0.0004350351],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011129256,0.0006291525,0.013989682,0.000013279481,0.0003365255,0.00070977595,0.0070582633,7.043884e-7,0.0029983942,0.0074150264,0.33079913,0.63593876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001294829,0.00015240486,0.9506598,0.00004524683,0.000016733225,0.0032030162,0.00088277087,1.8979033e-7,0.000023865276,0.0055611124,0.038011197,0.00014879463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001182981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000051457605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9366702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046834924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003473255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066518403","doi":"10.1348/014466610x526018","title":"The cultural narratives of Francophone and Anglophone Quebecers: Using a historical perspective to explore the relationships among collective relative deprivation, in‐group entitativity, and collective esteem","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Statistics Canada","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Collective identity; Narrative; Psychology; Social psychology; Social identity theory; Relative deprivation; Perspective (graphical); Collective action; Identity (music); Collective responsibility; French; Social group; Sociology; Humanities; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.07272025574691934,"score_gpt":0.3667585842130659,"score_spread":0.2940383284661465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066518403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834272,0.0011013988,0.00034383306,0.008882921,0.0013897098,0.00040288473,0.0000045619663,0.0000070107817,0.0044404487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99814886,0.0002395767,0.00062008126,0.00013525292,0.0004945864,0.000021821525,3.4182142e-7,0.000012052701,0.00032743198],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972087,0.0014902066,0.0005011876,0.00024711058,0.0002823252,0.00027042642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750173,0.00092303596,0.000555489,0.00006423308,0.0008535463,0.00010199284],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017160472,0.00012674929,0.0003688282,0.0001479991,0.002009199,0.000091836744,0.00023808943,0.000274392,0.000021342923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002619126,0.0001071173,0.00010025378,0.0013262744,0.002174283,0.00047475824,0.000052655556,0.0010742455,6.4678886e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042931436,0.00021734287,0.053559564,0.0000026567839,0.00016345007,0.000024341509,0.9222773,7.531144e-7,0.0025224562,0.011894281,0.0063471547,0.0025614414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007431134,0.0002080077,0.6310185,0.000031347452,0.000014135039,0.000071532966,0.30119962,0.0000010643865,0.0000046746823,0.065840356,0.0007718559,0.00009576744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035705105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047093686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6210776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065956044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025900503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068779581","doi":"10.1348/014466602321149902","title":"Testing the social identity‐intergroup differentiation hypothesis: ‘We're not American eh!’","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social identity theory; Salience (neuroscience); Social psychology; Conceptualization; Social identity approach; Social group; Identity (music); Relevance (law); Personal identity; Developmental psychology; Self-concept; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.10778078262783508,"score_gpt":0.3710703630656277,"score_spread":0.2632895804377926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068779581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8974567,0.0008061758,0.00065039954,0.04989251,0.0043407036,0.00024078252,0.000019578927,0.000087254964,0.046505872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98756236,0.00069419655,0.00017395023,0.0047251093,0.006167194,0.000010626599,9.471225e-7,0.000032939908,0.0006326852],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963341,0.0012663361,0.00080635014,0.00029143644,0.0006625886,0.0006392359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997752,0.00045095902,0.0011398555,0.00010002508,0.00043120905,0.00012591691],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001241586,0.00018640512,0.0005252824,0.00013606089,0.002188982,0.000312204,0.001003695,0.0002747491,0.0013625497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009952489,0.00019106074,0.00042875885,0.00077459513,0.0017167839,0.0005229629,0.00006185682,0.00080311985,0.00010643773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000122045174,0.00069363916,0.0034662643,0.000010417358,0.00032306358,0.00018139857,0.06337903,2.7944031e-7,0.0017785489,0.008187506,0.18996789,0.7318899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017348406,0.00044315855,0.85891443,0.00008963399,0.00017160761,0.00040895806,0.0396323,0.000008338292,0.0000094089,0.018101033,0.07999023,0.0004960777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091259787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020315712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8554481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001583919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039481904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071649225","doi":"10.1348/014466600164462","title":"Social identity and the true believer: Responses to threatened self‐stereotypes among the intrinsically religious","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; St. Jerome's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Categorization; Religious identity; Religious orientation; Social identity theory; Identity (music); Perception; Social identity approach; Social group; Epistemology; Religiosity","score_opus":0.02542867606904552,"score_gpt":0.3668491694989293,"score_spread":0.3414204934298838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071649225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8976222,0.0019503393,0.00003363301,0.08311142,0.0007914269,0.00031983,0.000008029253,0.00003633038,0.01612674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784714,0.0066617755,0.00008373154,0.011102303,0.002892962,0.000011625157,7.479486e-7,0.000020128851,0.00075533806],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536455,0.002609064,0.0007136042,0.00028659755,0.0005351362,0.0004910434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985686,0.0004751302,0.0003435136,0.00014839986,0.00030377242,0.00016057551],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004200718,0.00016134362,0.00050605246,0.000084969484,0.0020988933,0.0003554824,0.000857553,0.00034717374,0.00022778181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039723323,0.00012750919,0.00028676246,0.0004554177,0.0024752847,0.0002800268,0.00005449249,0.00063677237,0.00004700538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056865327,0.00051289704,0.02232265,0.00001523201,0.00057465676,0.0005210243,0.21353619,0.0000010935719,0.000032428456,0.03624766,0.51669943,0.2038502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031561325,0.00019891834,0.7974102,0.000026971222,0.00011544156,0.0007001515,0.0033011176,1.8744915e-7,0.0000012105811,0.074956395,0.11990885,0.00022446435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048685125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0091177905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77508754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059488415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012911764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077170090","doi":"10.1348/014466605x53695","title":"Three ways to forgive: A numerically aided phenomenological study","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Forgiveness; Psychology; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; CLARITY; Interpersonal relationship; Theme (computing); Experiential learning","score_opus":0.03579846106590434,"score_gpt":0.3521770172047431,"score_spread":0.31637855613883875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077170090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.966436,0.000661969,0.006519486,0.001169798,0.0023308808,0.0004185118,0.000017180406,0.000052119944,0.02239403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970851,0.000015030657,0.0008017444,0.0006679342,0.0010862014,0.00003269633,0.000003853843,0.000045444416,0.0002619832],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975294,0.00014398784,0.000984391,0.00040455436,0.0003311718,0.00060648646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888724,0.000057767233,0.00045332714,0.0001766403,0.00025799667,0.00016702605],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005750778,0.00021767101,0.0006655769,0.00021300705,0.00032011364,0.00006314349,0.0005608741,0.0004190121,0.0022339136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033402495,0.00022325215,0.00028937813,0.0004822028,0.00022815015,0.00008633918,0.00006928668,0.00086020847,0.00027293182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031838077,0.022273025,0.051808912,0.0000129661985,0.0012132062,0.024229689,0.007580931,0.000035705463,0.0036872607,0.02843474,0.29234624,0.56519353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052213892,0.0030600962,0.9511734,0.00002318899,0.00014182426,0.003777442,0.0020657142,2.6368446e-7,0.0000036559843,0.012015242,0.022179693,0.0003380839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046149368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021318729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8993645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071691626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036207144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078118675","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12101","title":"Tweeting about sexism: The well‐being benefits of a social media collective action","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Media Influence and Health","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Action (physics); Collective action; Psychology; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Social media; Cognition; Communication; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.12123602155173539,"score_gpt":0.35771557870046344,"score_spread":0.23647955714872804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078118675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9148473,0.00075280375,0.000008691598,0.003353209,0.0030098872,0.000111954185,0.000020392474,0.0000120030145,0.07788372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99030125,0.00021457917,0.00003225011,0.00152129,0.007499362,0.0000046234322,0.0000031501227,0.00001687772,0.00040663744],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984247,0.00024311511,0.0005906976,0.000111808076,0.00035999398,0.00026966544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982862,0.00018668668,0.0007318113,0.000044032535,0.0006645071,0.00008676045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011668853,0.000094939176,0.00035974698,0.00009771132,0.0006797224,0.000081795915,0.00021880734,0.00012633033,0.00063245953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024741187,0.00008933946,0.00013966444,0.00008573643,0.0004994332,0.00020464274,0.000021073642,0.00052729715,0.00001960118],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004032791,0.0002467816,0.0007756403,0.000050029557,0.00019449128,0.00007090716,0.62625176,0.0000067768015,0.000071066526,0.051974516,0.20923917,0.11071559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007652714,0.0010890783,0.26492244,0.0004869871,0.0003028485,0.0014284978,0.21320935,0.000007999564,0.00009443965,0.07689442,0.43327257,0.00063865294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019043784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019401764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4130424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008510858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026186995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69249886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079007373","doi":"10.1348/014466609x468042","title":"Losing on all fronts: The effects of negative versus positive person‐based campaigns on implicit and explicit evaluations of political candidates","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Politics; Social psychology; Statement (logic); Adversary; Implicit attitude; Associative property; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.040432534969329685,"score_gpt":0.40842079051256025,"score_spread":0.36798825554323056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079007373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.970671,0.00025434015,0.000093646224,0.010502899,0.0008927166,0.00026625695,0.00003564575,0.000007611383,0.017275903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99549055,0.0000816446,0.00005757782,0.0037594233,0.00056774035,0.000004130629,0.0000023184532,0.000009163086,0.00002744817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779135,0.0008974368,0.00038340676,0.00018213734,0.0003758867,0.00036981146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773866,0.0012907923,0.0004413893,0.00007397532,0.0003346855,0.000120496916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006148034,0.000120988436,0.00040177227,0.00010964649,0.00038432906,0.000029558974,0.0002580873,0.0002137567,0.00007117681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011149321,0.000114256385,0.0001923902,0.00019119731,0.0007781339,0.00009456743,0.0000084617495,0.00038535398,0.0000025464574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012844609,0.0056873322,0.004000897,0.000069375346,0.0017972689,0.00035024245,0.20762146,0.0000072650855,0.030660426,0.4688018,0.05872853,0.20943081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011598742,0.013216878,0.9034768,0.00066832994,0.0004019792,0.00008430916,0.03700097,0.000008376156,0.001715646,0.03074501,0.00067020924,0.00041278263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010282831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038060112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8994759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001304784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011115339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46592402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094069497","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12079","title":"‘More than skin‐deep’: Biological essentialism in response to a distinctiveness threat in a stigmatized fan community","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Essentialism; Psychology; Social psychology; Ingroups and outgroups; Outgroup; Affect (linguistics); Sociology; Gender studies; Communication","score_opus":0.04281651974706219,"score_gpt":0.39834527266769654,"score_spread":0.35552875292063435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094069497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821047,0.000095874595,0.00090481865,0.009354369,0.0012114851,0.00024200298,0.000010318108,0.000022202117,0.0060541937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968865,0.00009803531,0.00017354994,0.001949549,0.0007804614,0.000021135564,0.000003463702,0.000017011113,0.00007028485],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98959416,0.008473979,0.000792638,0.00025041407,0.00030746605,0.0005813659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982736,0.0008174781,0.0003675041,0.00013422067,0.00021436425,0.00019279479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058295983,0.00016710853,0.00070552353,0.0003156929,0.00056391716,0.00007872401,0.0008282025,0.00049594924,0.0001980806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025656743,0.00018910304,0.00021675127,0.0007689013,0.0009832606,0.00017171643,0.00009351058,0.0011344218,0.000021830236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.021521483,0.005883713,0.19475387,0.000039781266,0.00022288212,0.0015698869,0.40371966,0.00000839013,0.012924673,0.016335614,0.0112006655,0.3318194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027010695,0.0004079025,0.9526936,0.00009963989,0.0000075216003,0.00013265658,0.014881714,6.7762454e-7,0.0000054697307,0.018868279,0.0099954065,0.00020605659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059080953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029364318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75793976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022573608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008728635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98834723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094199917","doi":"10.1348/014466609x480624","title":"Changes in social identities over time: The role of coping and adaptation processes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"University of Queensland","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Coping (psychology); Social identity theory; Social support; Adaptation (eye); Social group; Social identity approach; Path analysis (statistics); Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.02387395898175875,"score_gpt":0.34838053633471155,"score_spread":0.3245065773529528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094199917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9780869,0.00087017124,0.000010451688,0.0046704076,0.0008481913,0.00010441997,0.000007795718,0.000008386025,0.015393277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996616,0.00076526945,0.000049887403,0.0005732781,0.0017981553,0.0000050432004,9.277974e-7,0.000009135176,0.00018229474],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988048,0.00026860108,0.00036198314,0.00011111546,0.00023162524,0.00022187496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908257,0.00013980767,0.0004441999,0.000029131592,0.00026975124,0.000034550787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009897974,0.00006931001,0.00025231307,0.000096831136,0.00045882244,0.000062046485,0.00025649168,0.0002325436,0.00033146064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036534076,0.00007209774,0.00006150479,0.00027758535,0.0010077133,0.0002087982,0.00002328186,0.00041993847,0.0000028277923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000435729,0.00065641216,0.04289315,0.00008008026,0.00021837566,0.00009592636,0.31613103,3.4073454e-7,0.030897558,0.048349775,0.04871603,0.51152563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020603272,0.00027915012,0.7102479,0.000097216216,0.000056465633,0.00029840405,0.0503826,0.0000030632282,0.00012367932,0.12969959,0.10644775,0.00030385808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005500698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011663179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66735476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018468787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010990371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6508328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105126605","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12003","title":"Social change in <scp>S</scp> outh <scp>A</scp> frica: A historical approach to relative deprivation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs; Queen's University; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Relative deprivation; Social identity theory; Social psychology; Psychology; Group (periodic table); Identity (music); Social comparison theory; Ingroups and outgroups; Social group; Trajectory; Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.09385920480522922,"score_gpt":0.36929092871553254,"score_spread":0.27543172391030335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105126605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7804512,0.0019949013,0.0014020582,0.0050012353,0.0050227605,0.00055914035,0.000014723861,0.00006752205,0.20548649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825296,0.00025274162,0.0006810598,0.0034875877,0.011159647,0.00006915149,0.0000075248477,0.00004917999,0.0017635525],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525356,0.0013754821,0.0009975799,0.00041872507,0.000717837,0.0012368426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976269,0.00062815537,0.00082207646,0.000103071994,0.00039146203,0.00042834217],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00252585,0.0002612553,0.0008092847,0.0004276334,0.0008557343,0.0000886838,0.0007079039,0.00096291443,0.00003740649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034510011,0.0003309363,0.000398184,0.0012869393,0.00044475286,0.00090867147,0.000090469635,0.0012861936,0.00009213811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039098682,0.0021303769,0.031168936,0.000012931712,0.00015424097,0.000082377184,0.4895527,2.3069232e-7,0.0001587112,0.037128597,0.40672982,0.032842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013521217,0.00020202642,0.561219,0.000028596605,0.00004654068,0.00014823409,0.024352217,4.7857014e-7,0.0000024837143,0.006471579,0.40607643,0.000100279736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001476785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006412049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5300501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011044748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011492287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105384888","doi":"10.1348/0144666041501714","title":"Why are men more likely to support group‐based dominance than women? The mediating role of gender identification","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Social dominance orientation; Psychology; Social psychology; Dominance (genetics); Situational ethics; Social identity theory; Ideology; Structural equation modeling; Perspective (graphical); Social group; Developmental psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.028000365801760477,"score_gpt":0.35331345710806344,"score_spread":0.325313091306303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105384888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9679838,0.00037997257,0.0011069463,0.021576922,0.0016362262,0.00029518438,0.000038037702,0.00002309287,0.006959829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99097204,0.00011846261,0.00018439957,0.007194247,0.0014118474,0.000028233873,0.000003847365,0.000020206326,0.00006671191],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975308,0.00043246386,0.00077251863,0.00024207387,0.00053972803,0.00048237914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815255,0.00010199102,0.0010396906,0.00012506609,0.0004256688,0.00015501937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002017807,0.00012419187,0.00039668297,0.00011906078,0.00060322415,0.00007306686,0.0007435393,0.0002545741,0.00020069827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041172447,0.00012838627,0.0002175149,0.0004950731,0.0006656586,0.00022489537,0.000033054992,0.00039021252,0.000016699672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012139579,0.0023994234,0.024575118,0.000058367754,0.00054681103,0.00036720056,0.52628136,0.00004669589,0.040148117,0.015913839,0.17565215,0.21279697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027022345,0.0005434534,0.81249094,0.00007471867,0.000051581657,0.00014532167,0.09297399,6.272509e-7,0.00028079015,0.032613114,0.05781211,0.0003111094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088309334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010029047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7879158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020899737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014238313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52354395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105604706","doi":"10.1348/014466605x37477","title":"Parental bonding and depressive affect: The mediating role of coping resources","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Stressor; Psychology; Coping (psychology); Developmental psychology; Affect (linguistics); Cognition; Psychological resilience; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.013805646054801285,"score_gpt":0.3038011925638444,"score_spread":0.28999554650904313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105604706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9763469,0.008409362,0.000036676367,0.0041240295,0.00091337826,0.00009717041,0.000018988329,0.000008887215,0.010044607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639076,0.00031098918,0.000110454705,0.0010421425,0.0019893786,0.0000023222542,0.0000032066737,0.000012369645,0.0001383726],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870557,0.000183918,0.00050702476,0.00015524917,0.00021180806,0.0002364551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999166,0.00011608216,0.00051870313,0.00004874008,0.00008295521,0.00006750238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043611063,0.00010186706,0.00027737717,0.000065868924,0.00032063434,0.000034464916,0.0002037341,0.000119503056,0.00020369358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045738958,0.00009335474,0.0001303906,0.00011491276,0.0002321902,0.0000837016,0.000039688373,0.0003661442,0.000006292702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033309948,0.0006753809,0.12882741,0.000043039072,0.0005073386,0.00010562367,0.03872792,0.0000027892795,0.0033180634,0.0071631307,0.044315055,0.7759811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013999825,0.00007436958,0.94846594,0.00017482351,0.000033908094,0.0012227624,0.0031283482,9.213698e-7,0.00003959761,0.0017365391,0.043603458,0.000119355005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029014112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002666996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81963855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000206657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018171744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3806896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109963254","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12018","title":"The effects of autonomous and controlled regulation of performance‐approach goals on well‐being: A process model","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports","field":"Psychology","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Concordance; Social psychology; Process (computing); Structural equation modeling; Test (biology); Well-being; Goal orientation; Applied psychology; Computer science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.015635872579770258,"score_gpt":0.3095047252250342,"score_spread":0.2938688526452639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109963254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95229506,0.0009902178,0.0007997307,0.00016805125,0.00078079966,0.0003402594,0.0000017541046,0.0000079248875,0.044616215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998426,0.00017644407,0.00016532591,0.00026748914,0.00030858786,0.000017919956,0.000001948833,0.000016450256,0.00061983627],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983841,0.00023423313,0.00077045395,0.00012777779,0.000227355,0.0002560347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983159,0.00022087879,0.0010554069,0.00010413783,0.00023244212,0.00007129224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010770151,0.00011244342,0.0005189891,0.000093179406,0.0001597331,0.000013317301,0.00016505983,0.00020669322,0.00008318356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011787316,0.00009785062,0.0001321527,0.00011970094,0.00029047843,0.00012727187,0.000010712424,0.00029316207,0.0000022062115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015636915,0.0077720173,0.15584359,0.0009092171,0.0022199024,0.000051722036,0.098678246,0.00050085277,0.003222939,0.090497114,0.043862376,0.5808051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01801482,0.0011436264,0.97091436,0.00018570389,0.00018288245,0.00095168495,0.0017983499,0.0001970629,0.00021986582,0.0038579556,0.0022672217,0.00026649114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000035713394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.9693656e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81507075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001849377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000355346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39902326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111612557","doi":"10.1348/014466604x17605","title":"Discrimination between dominant and subordinate groups: The positive–negative asymmetry effect and normative processes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Social identity theory; Outcome (game theory); Normative; Categorization; Ingroups and outgroups; In-group favoritism; Social comparison theory; Salary; Social group; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.014675120431761208,"score_gpt":0.35102587547572006,"score_spread":0.33635075504395884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111612557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96759105,0.0017705937,0.0003032314,0.017584741,0.00042158802,0.00025526705,0.000022345786,0.000011699728,0.012039468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959046,0.0012722283,0.00009208565,0.0007858816,0.0018166055,0.000008498233,0.000002154323,0.000012141571,0.000105785606],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977748,0.001052283,0.0004062197,0.0001929587,0.0002575779,0.00031618273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820185,0.00083761447,0.00046349823,0.000039374492,0.00035417633,0.000103480364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016886367,0.0001326625,0.00038158,0.00009369775,0.0010546442,0.00013710117,0.00024489104,0.00021599446,0.000036432488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008159629,0.00011326783,0.00008529571,0.00031027908,0.0014990894,0.0005657493,0.00004293241,0.00046843247,0.000004791397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037054592,0.00020343729,0.018496804,0.000048670547,0.00031196707,0.00009193779,0.12805405,7.880264e-8,0.00028819012,0.0063118823,0.010213384,0.8356091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020929466,0.0007641883,0.95691705,0.00013071604,0.00014210262,0.000489941,0.016982263,4.902778e-7,0.00014902347,0.013753888,0.008344026,0.00023337318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036906698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094126887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93842024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000757896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005636666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8111577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134606327","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12005","title":"Nations' income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":251,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Ambivalence; Inequality; Economic inequality; Stereotype (UML); Social psychology; System justification; Psychology; Life expectancy; Social inequality; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Demography","score_opus":0.2187365579817343,"score_gpt":0.414065584981602,"score_spread":0.1953290269998677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134606327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829296,0.0050159767,0.00006676648,0.005755713,0.0024603878,0.00015129002,0.000033785927,0.000008209367,0.0035782948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957683,0.0004328933,0.00005228294,0.0009309694,0.0011668764,0.000009858204,0.0000039795136,0.000011646777,0.0016231858],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979097,0.00070468814,0.00053317234,0.00015326586,0.00027261177,0.00042653485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988918,0.00019509057,0.0004878492,0.00011101521,0.00022456661,0.0000897003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012191795,0.00013088493,0.000345339,0.000086985296,0.00023200172,0.00008303944,0.0004044323,0.00022914294,0.00074571854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021234136,0.00010745662,0.00018756678,0.00027022022,0.000390671,0.0003095758,0.000046533787,0.0006420385,0.000034553177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040511313,0.0012801528,0.71516424,0.00005432588,0.00040069377,0.0001517527,0.04532657,3.8290466e-7,0.0005543538,0.010310051,0.08473612,0.14161626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012187442,0.00013890289,0.98343015,0.000066605106,0.000027808555,0.0007783772,0.0076261014,4.008918e-7,0.000004132608,0.0013121766,0.005276229,0.00012037718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011194215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017309574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2682659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047977395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023386187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8165095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135368225","doi":"10.1348/014466608x389582","title":"When I equals we: Exploring the relation between social and personal identity of extreme right‐wing political party members","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Social psychology; Personal identity; Psychology; Identity (music); Social identity theory; Turkish; Population; Politics; Collective identity; Nationalism; Social group; Self-concept; Sociology; Political science; Law; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.17154798008371555,"score_gpt":0.40508609218348524,"score_spread":0.23353811209976968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135368225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9467443,0.00053845276,0.00031107248,0.03248847,0.0011320174,0.00011814574,0.0000135875425,0.000019320016,0.018634612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943702,0.00030143277,0.000113405506,0.0009726737,0.004093532,0.000002640234,0.0000017862867,0.00001108177,0.00013320667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703753,0.000932225,0.00073034194,0.00021224297,0.00055705366,0.00053062505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874634,0.00026895752,0.0005213733,0.000050861974,0.0002591402,0.0001533093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020820608,0.00012665357,0.00046891702,0.00010040689,0.0011308506,0.00010371277,0.00037837029,0.00029826057,0.0003865383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033124763,0.00012883161,0.00027879668,0.00023930187,0.0011431803,0.000791024,0.000032136835,0.0006384559,0.000004449876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031203803,0.00049385644,0.024200583,0.000026556414,0.00047193773,0.00018364775,0.19885942,1.6705069e-7,0.0016463393,0.42657447,0.040319867,0.3069111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008612618,0.00017257028,0.8156921,0.00005154409,0.00008628427,0.00009437302,0.013264525,4.3811514e-7,0.0000072278413,0.15705141,0.012563819,0.00015444162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062704185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043182904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7914915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010940891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082300634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86977035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136304080","doi":"10.1348/014466604x17443","title":"Gender, mood state, and justice preference: Do mood states moderate gender‐based norms of justice?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; University of Guelph; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Mood; Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Task (project management); Preference; Payment","score_opus":0.06996561390418009,"score_gpt":0.37141870011998707,"score_spread":0.30145308621580696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136304080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9356022,0.0031952898,0.00306063,0.0032550055,0.002174109,0.00027052732,0.0001067247,0.000035400542,0.052300103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99034566,0.005075325,0.0012104731,0.0013786051,0.0016371718,0.0000070008996,0.0000048022844,0.000030005056,0.00031097044],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968393,0.0006304099,0.0009785311,0.0003545812,0.0005419284,0.0006552508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780315,0.00022374187,0.0008438432,0.00011398619,0.0007472227,0.0002680623],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012701501,0.00021624913,0.0006364033,0.00017973845,0.0007048567,0.00013229703,0.0005050873,0.00040588243,0.00069795933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025794192,0.00024850498,0.00020366786,0.00033979918,0.0010444948,0.00043778494,0.000044915454,0.0006703512,0.00001876396],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039719963,0.0051756594,0.007948194,0.00069493026,0.0015456738,0.00043961528,0.20705612,0.0005679801,0.0049334904,0.024300685,0.13649635,0.60686934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026544038,0.003125413,0.52328783,0.00045941118,0.0024061871,0.0016586181,0.097804435,0.00039423982,0.00044056255,0.25388777,0.08735727,0.0026342515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031027457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011301202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60423505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009446212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028179702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136911333","doi":"10.1348/014466607x216124","title":"Identity formation in multiparty negotiations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Superordinate goals; Negotiation; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Identity negotiation; Identity formation; Social identity theory; Social group; Self-concept; Sociology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04203200224984785,"score_gpt":0.4032391685110482,"score_spread":0.3612071662612003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136911333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9193632,0.00021883436,0.015308206,0.0035726696,0.0012352288,0.00016588422,0.0000017714957,0.00001883558,0.060115356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817216,0.00029989277,0.00019274381,0.00047746513,0.00063404674,8.077173e-7,0.000002203713,0.00000394472,0.00021674173],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988767,0.00015695316,0.000427217,0.00006484512,0.00026415213,0.000210126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938846,0.00006155354,0.00031197228,0.000027864271,0.00016239795,0.000047771926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022791757,0.000039305694,0.000117420095,0.00019947621,0.00030681616,0.00007408555,0.00016799333,0.00010290012,0.00022323205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025626374,0.000055366214,0.000073905045,0.00039727,0.00009446451,0.0010847863,0.000012680896,0.00019023017,0.000017513616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021074695,0.0007988621,0.048627328,0.000022738315,0.00007098801,0.00056941854,0.08514622,0.000010278223,0.0011005279,0.09116823,0.047854215,0.7244204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010054697,0.000025507934,0.91934675,0.00001788353,0.000011425974,0.000041342908,0.00418662,0.000003654254,0.000009408007,0.0055712275,0.06970376,0.00007693256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005740852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036310468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87071943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011504983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024604678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98127437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137534912","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02010.x","title":"A dark side to self‐forgiveness: Forgiving the self and its association with chronic unhealthy behaviour","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Forgiveness; Psychology; Contemplation; Extant taxon; Social psychology; Association (psychology); Self; Experiential avoidance; Psychotherapist; Anxiety; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.021434276230841272,"score_gpt":0.312166892291398,"score_spread":0.2907326160605567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137534912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99043185,0.00211202,0.00006673575,0.0015447686,0.0015600888,0.0003725182,0.000022824337,0.000052385447,0.003836821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976676,0.0004353052,0.00025739658,0.0006914234,0.0005072464,0.00003255677,0.0000022791517,0.000053234875,0.00035293974],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773616,0.0004288171,0.00062250433,0.00031047603,0.00031431168,0.0005877465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846596,0.00009024884,0.00076485303,0.00013284502,0.0003584765,0.00018763026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011687186,0.0001989854,0.00044215945,0.00015372974,0.000508046,0.000056331377,0.00036333446,0.00045853664,0.00029900993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033235116,0.00017162452,0.00013829944,0.000357631,0.00007398208,0.00018104874,0.000049183313,0.0009089848,0.000043395485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035977836,0.006896904,0.5309225,0.00023787029,0.0050606676,0.008451288,0.16720992,0.000015312795,0.0017083555,0.0080136685,0.062694766,0.20519102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002698953,0.0014514974,0.98233485,0.00012402872,0.0003534375,0.0047302647,0.0014197847,7.9437365e-7,0.000037828926,0.00029082087,0.0062975306,0.00026019278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029014447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003219284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4514124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027850643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016768431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69986445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145845235","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12113","title":"Marginal and happy? The need for uniqueness predicts the adjustment of marginal immigrants","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Immigration; Uniqueness; Happiness; Psychology; Life satisfaction; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.04948004327802132,"score_gpt":0.3535191696125585,"score_spread":0.3040391263345372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145845235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95500094,0.006805456,0.0033606235,0.012080194,0.005535244,0.00069434685,0.00009196144,0.000027887667,0.016403321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955924,0.000331129,0.00024137301,0.0019964695,0.0013000718,0.000034761157,0.0000042951065,0.000022487015,0.00047700445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776185,0.0006716633,0.0006552606,0.00023534645,0.00029717266,0.0003787023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836767,0.0003386171,0.0006546148,0.00017085392,0.00033495313,0.00013326641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020946243,0.0001600553,0.00042462788,0.00007906378,0.00024110351,0.000036939167,0.0004145781,0.00026299187,0.00014975309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015693868,0.00011414926,0.00018887607,0.00019163424,0.000634036,0.00008409294,0.000033093784,0.0005423005,0.0000073751266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0065390547,0.00102192,0.012759245,0.00004942984,0.00093365676,0.00023507417,0.009267566,0.000011969588,0.0007556058,0.018790841,0.5222679,0.42736775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005071348,0.0013301083,0.9128512,0.0000762577,0.0001607809,0.0049621235,0.0043839565,0.000005567843,0.000011039221,0.015067619,0.055909723,0.00017024884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030977008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006034242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.900092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003393384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055192126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46548718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147786894","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12049","title":"Perceived control qualifies the effects of threat on prejudice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Psychology; Social psychology; Control (management); Perceived control","score_opus":0.01652307867466986,"score_gpt":0.34648343055294106,"score_spread":0.3299603518782712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147786894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93409073,0.00095363904,0.00008183311,0.01380765,0.0030909746,0.0003843347,0.000005136872,0.000018254328,0.047567446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99184394,0.00085542916,0.000021350645,0.004974398,0.0016296599,0.000018274233,4.3770152e-7,0.000014154346,0.00064232794],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973023,0.0012696071,0.00053066295,0.00015622735,0.00038040098,0.00036079015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979243,0.0008817189,0.00055668585,0.00009540769,0.00044656673,0.000095314484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008451518,0.00011278679,0.00044166343,0.00006986151,0.00055934454,0.000062659245,0.0005848628,0.00027986077,0.00072952075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009190431,0.00009858155,0.00030013119,0.00019597937,0.0012990754,0.00018390521,0.000015932977,0.000483071,0.000067666355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060118234,0.0014774728,0.008159027,0.000059326892,0.0008883486,0.00019473866,0.09526602,8.894849e-7,0.015215968,0.034562327,0.5753854,0.26818928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028631107,0.001024775,0.9352577,0.00013121561,0.00007654114,0.00013174095,0.009903584,3.1116414e-7,0.000028372628,0.026759075,0.023641877,0.00018171803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020140186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036406986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92709863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045667843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006447946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79877406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159527431","doi":"10.1348/014466607x231109","title":"Interracial prison contact: The pros for (socially dominant) cons","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Social dominance orientation; Psychology; Empathy; Social psychology; Prison; Moderation; Social contact; Ingroups and outgroups; Contact hypothesis; Prejudice (legal term); Developmental psychology; Authoritarianism; Criminology","score_opus":0.0388817183687032,"score_gpt":0.41432227766781193,"score_spread":0.37544055929910874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159527431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70951295,0.0017984672,0.01911534,0.0646108,0.0226372,0.0020458822,0.00006893077,0.00008856848,0.18012184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98584765,0.00026284126,0.0003443597,0.004520534,0.007869149,0.00001868556,0.0000023576858,0.00002914365,0.0011053],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972403,0.0004658713,0.0009181183,0.00023864351,0.00039137487,0.0007457018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758893,0.0005744997,0.0008729432,0.00008609645,0.00071811076,0.00015942099],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048008095,0.00015363496,0.000495771,0.00010517633,0.0016198357,0.000132007,0.00079054263,0.0004980916,0.00033308397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011325392,0.00015066916,0.0004961305,0.00029541584,0.0012598032,0.00022718406,0.00003564047,0.00068306015,0.000018714712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020151015,0.0006560846,0.0027156258,0.000015271118,0.0003590327,0.0002771736,0.068129174,5.2646335e-8,0.004548178,0.11418643,0.37845933,0.42863855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036299403,0.0007752938,0.12779641,0.000059698392,0.00009609788,0.0004863864,0.020517219,2.0751891e-7,0.0000756903,0.030610884,0.8156459,0.00030631942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045840722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007858427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43718654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016692432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033786573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161619182","doi":"10.1348/014466605x43777","title":"A social representation is not a quiet thing: Exploring the critical potential of social representations theory","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social Representations and Identity","field":"Psychology","cited_by":499,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Trent University; Nottingham Trent University","keywords":"Reification (Marxism); Epistemology; Ideology; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Social theory; Social identity theory; Social representation; Social psychology; Representation (politics); Critical theory; Identity (music); Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Social group; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.07980273120818035,"score_gpt":0.4335572963355984,"score_spread":0.3537545651274181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161619182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95051116,0.0003809953,0.0044003995,0.014601968,0.0037712893,0.0003144986,0.0000981977,0.000046509584,0.025874998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992967,0.000046564615,0.00018905946,0.00082460954,0.0048553315,0.00005167157,0.000017380802,0.000046499983,0.0010018863],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953685,0.0015407009,0.0013939706,0.00041487077,0.0007644298,0.00051753485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739295,0.00052135263,0.0009641592,0.00019848022,0.0008525403,0.00007052463],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014559377,0.00020453054,0.0005887629,0.0002312805,0.0014670456,0.00018227301,0.0005843126,0.0003218923,0.0016581194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005060461,0.00022736921,0.0007873029,0.00066237914,0.0012192456,0.0005390443,0.000097761964,0.00084969803,0.00004118552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017476536,0.0021343897,0.004612411,0.0000419047,0.000985959,0.00070839236,0.0664169,0.0000074016352,0.005617523,0.3612591,0.512171,0.044297393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024009047,0.00012157569,0.88479847,0.000018288463,0.000331329,0.0008112825,0.024699615,0.0000028274085,0.00017351983,0.08387785,0.0025101136,0.00025425473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001422446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000101398575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.880186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007112008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000996813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171923797","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02073.x","title":"Are we all in this together? Co‐victimization, inclusive social identity and collective action in solidarity with the disadvantaged","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Collective action; Social psychology; Social identity theory; Solidarity; Disadvantaged; Salience (neuroscience); Collective identity; Psychology; Identity (music); Social identity approach; Injustice; Social group; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.0896284296302085,"score_gpt":0.4196992188557618,"score_spread":0.3300707892255533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171923797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94197077,0.00043437636,0.00065428833,0.014808405,0.00081773405,0.0003451862,0.000012364596,0.000017480146,0.040939387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99602354,0.0010573395,0.00010164103,0.0019523518,0.00057955383,0.00001367608,0.0000011587026,0.000015360032,0.00025541233],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972258,0.0015217079,0.00041673673,0.00022144544,0.00026687206,0.00034742898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987901,0.00012250905,0.00071379443,0.000045789566,0.0002636236,0.0000642189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015317444,0.00011984458,0.0003778922,0.00015378057,0.0008913641,0.00007582545,0.0003277556,0.00032932154,0.0004037034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018761471,0.000117322495,0.00008571919,0.00056875293,0.001145641,0.0005715186,0.000041190026,0.0007717784,0.0000032941014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001879375,0.0014026768,0.14868793,0.000018724013,0.00028414486,0.00061912095,0.74459875,9.897755e-7,0.0003013794,0.0043911026,0.054104295,0.043711502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020827618,0.00016484465,0.8863764,0.00003872577,0.00002919423,0.00015124188,0.07356335,7.723666e-7,0.000006477822,0.029592978,0.007822728,0.00017054455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002365817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0786483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7376885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003092851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013846958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.938164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2418794081","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12145","title":"Social identity change in response to discrimination","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Social identity theory; Identity (music); Identity change; Social group; Feeling; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.08499979768165969,"score_gpt":0.45371554242911655,"score_spread":0.36871574474745683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2418794081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91041565,0.0001283458,0.00039280506,0.08011106,0.0020466775,0.00017999484,0.000011205431,0.000019301728,0.006694941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99267286,0.00018255212,0.000059852086,0.0033849755,0.003154231,0.00001694172,4.7428654e-7,0.000015350286,0.0005127879],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969948,0.001395205,0.0005357922,0.00021131091,0.0004081357,0.00045475664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990565,0.00015866643,0.0003120346,0.00005045342,0.00029094052,0.00013141292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030223518,0.00009727757,0.0003252553,0.00027896604,0.0004383939,0.00006581365,0.0004821116,0.00031144993,0.0005596533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094418676,0.000101727834,0.00018035268,0.00052349386,0.00046037734,0.00077630836,0.00004254474,0.00025496088,0.00007980816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024277843,0.00061834964,0.009415903,0.000006047608,0.00005347141,0.00071785756,0.10898946,1.2891059e-8,0.00822758,0.027597638,0.06417108,0.7777748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014493462,0.00020026784,0.9089519,0.00006097977,0.0000095677915,0.000095520794,0.0029317343,1.4587204e-8,0.000005240595,0.016017789,0.070131466,0.00014617643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010023756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008970213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.899536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027813186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008017243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6127811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517560021","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12155","title":"Social Identity Mapping: A procedure for visual representation and assessment of subjective multiple group memberships","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Mental Health Research Topics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Psychology; Social identity theory; Social psychology; Social identity approach; Social group; Social representation","score_opus":0.15277335975933412,"score_gpt":0.5282541740271182,"score_spread":0.375480814267784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517560021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98473376,0.0003359407,0.007816626,0.0031629386,0.0009373045,0.0006936373,0.00006428751,0.0000123686805,0.0022431163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971928,0.00011432938,0.0010954114,0.00024990927,0.0009651463,0.000055595556,0.0000059417575,0.000023823302,0.0002970393],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976,0.000590155,0.0007362419,0.00029586945,0.000378752,0.00039895877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982509,0.00037771874,0.0007636252,0.000067193774,0.00041690568,0.00012368022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015383791,0.00011410169,0.0004308984,0.00017246374,0.00026638174,0.000030522708,0.00020958556,0.00026011132,0.00023639297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000371258,0.000116324234,0.00017070193,0.00020509913,0.0003628621,0.00031688408,0.000048078513,0.00036326397,0.0000029178786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039475467,0.0032888926,0.23058672,0.00070695294,0.0011216155,0.00041657864,0.012853458,7.5837775e-8,0.020607656,0.03514543,0.056239795,0.6350853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0064265416,0.0007853349,0.9768514,0.00008596617,0.000029516705,0.0006854336,0.002640704,0.0000029329747,0.000045324177,0.009940241,0.0023853413,0.00012125928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011954754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028754788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7462647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013932184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010484628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47435647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585972597","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12186","title":"Using the SIRDE model of social change to examine the vote of Scottish teenagers in the 2014 independence referendum","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Relative deprivation; Social psychology; Voting; Psychology; Independence (probability theory); Social identity theory; Identity (music); Collective identity; Politics; Social group; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.22355881820499335,"score_gpt":0.44181754944474994,"score_spread":0.2182587312397566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585972597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9504211,0.00038449935,0.00038433404,0.030969804,0.0016412961,0.00041197054,0.000034692413,0.000006033392,0.015746253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949301,0.00031838156,0.000101814614,0.0026779536,0.0017823235,0.0000106466505,5.562993e-7,0.000016037311,0.00016217877],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679184,0.0011442992,0.0007161123,0.0002107035,0.00067617145,0.00046087118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783313,0.00018878991,0.0012898253,0.00024834828,0.0003813172,0.00005858631],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041766516,0.00013699775,0.00047478927,0.00009935053,0.001616899,0.000118481395,0.0023595009,0.00036337553,0.000068350986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005528801,0.000100418634,0.0002615855,0.00024933796,0.0020960898,0.0003053511,0.00012528748,0.000854211,0.0000029258545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009993362,0.0013190113,0.015272255,0.000050113293,0.00047219195,0.00023308372,0.5066766,0.00003296925,0.01246577,0.04711508,0.1214238,0.29393974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020519441,0.00037393492,0.93342364,0.00017504732,0.000126242,0.00020054878,0.034337956,0.00003101865,0.00003846934,0.018347027,0.010546856,0.00034734752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008507267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013128189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9181514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006721826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013988266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750995011","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12216","title":"Low relational mobility leads to greater motivation to understand enemies but not friends and acquaintances","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07516280015799068,"score_gpt":0.3800349976963374,"score_spread":0.3048721975383467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750995011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.956377,0.00006235683,0.0010726874,0.022678964,0.0016688018,0.00014852665,0.000021501504,0.000014136104,0.017956024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940884,0.0001197401,0.00037188537,0.0029911685,0.0015908467,0.000004650154,0.000001104496,0.000011519249,0.00082064595],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998319,0.00026989524,0.00043885282,0.00027955358,0.00034742084,0.0003453104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881107,0.00012512777,0.00037922652,0.00011585177,0.0003553163,0.00021343764],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012011281,0.00011274328,0.00032297373,0.000106250045,0.0016783263,0.00022771239,0.00041956987,0.00026945854,0.00033266534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009216066,0.00013330436,0.00011217482,0.000112641996,0.0008972241,0.0004429533,0.000059667156,0.00028507103,0.000020088415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00299479,0.0010680777,0.26939484,0.000047637397,0.00051605323,0.00047128613,0.18926328,0.0000097762595,0.01367771,0.08907575,0.13174172,0.30173907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007637658,0.00027745706,0.9736578,0.000052636893,0.000017475319,0.00008623514,0.0061552147,1.7465064e-7,0.00008801707,0.011161138,0.0075730984,0.00016700133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046458613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014638508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.704263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001374525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007329104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766570108","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12226","title":"Unforgiveness: Refining theory and measurement of an understudied construct","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Rumination; Conceptualization; Discriminant validity; Interpersonal communication; Construct (python library); Construct validity; Scale (ratio); Forgiveness; Social psychology; Cognition; Convergent validity; Reliability (semiconductor); Developmental psychology; Psychometrics","score_opus":0.06197690705960791,"score_gpt":0.38106080284571275,"score_spread":0.31908389578610485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766570108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811919,0.002343422,0.00015708219,0.00028033392,0.002027278,0.00006106138,0.000013117861,0.000008616419,0.013917213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992361,0.00021801899,0.00013685354,0.00008983271,0.00020041144,0.0000024188269,9.536736e-7,0.00002108673,0.00009432497],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831146,0.00041837717,0.00056964124,0.00019927461,0.00025180503,0.00024945784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982474,0.000047407684,0.0010781557,0.00020024071,0.00033293993,0.00009390068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020696956,0.0001229045,0.00047972827,0.00009820933,0.00055125565,0.000053869673,0.00037718884,0.00029183543,0.00026416365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012039331,0.00013118652,0.00013290835,0.000045018183,0.0010532172,0.00016908822,0.000048146372,0.00042980828,0.0000037356372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022497023,0.00097015454,0.0229406,0.00005214811,0.0013783593,0.0021340786,0.005437163,0.0000012723567,0.0054601524,0.057217907,0.0016689984,0.90048945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005309306,0.00067150407,0.97153485,0.0002081982,0.00023199849,0.0049414854,0.0054660384,1.6062745e-7,0.000072466406,0.009467009,0.0018825269,0.00021443512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012270252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000634698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9485943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031674197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005738077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5349631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785019768","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12243","title":"Giving in when feeling less good: Procrastination, action control, and social temptations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Procrastination; Psychology; Social psychology; Feeling; Affect (linguistics); Mood; Mediation; Personality; Context (archaeology); Experience sampling method; Trait; Developmental psychology; Moderated mediation","score_opus":0.044477541533729695,"score_gpt":0.36820881890640317,"score_spread":0.3237312773726735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785019768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97573066,0.0006808473,0.0080798725,0.006579455,0.0022155032,0.0002526345,0.00001975304,0.000047991587,0.0063932925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99565685,0.000074757445,0.00042074386,0.00070043444,0.002538525,0.00002661289,0.0000035097798,0.000028412698,0.00055013446],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980166,0.00039432134,0.0007119591,0.00029490143,0.00022936403,0.0003528524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833304,0.00013689623,0.0006210103,0.00005132549,0.0008100947,0.00004763092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010171534,0.00015012876,0.0003789358,0.00028653524,0.00097155664,0.00009590484,0.00015477139,0.00024767805,0.00018061243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023960604,0.00020054776,0.00009474253,0.00027422025,0.00045448425,0.0003586683,0.00002439595,0.00051580014,0.000017608952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094681233,0.0015795792,0.2129531,0.00013081537,0.0008443164,0.00020449435,0.08178388,0.00000529168,0.0050973897,0.006034802,0.08364989,0.6067696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037183187,0.0002453343,0.97414196,0.000048826583,0.000051559924,0.0015586286,0.007278464,0.000010867244,0.000007667002,0.0044429484,0.00830711,0.00018834567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016799629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015674608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7611888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012247251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006124351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793293308","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12239","title":"How do passion for video games and needs frustration explain time spent gaming?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Passion; Psychology; Autonomy; Social psychology; Video game; Frustration; Competence (human resources); Association (psychology); Self-determination theory; Multimedia; Computer science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.026240088090913945,"score_gpt":0.3288226739163144,"score_spread":0.3025825858254005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793293308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96995527,0.0007158834,0.0045919144,0.00762619,0.0029204157,0.00032111013,0.00002378752,0.000030061305,0.013815385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886426,0.00006961419,0.0008399253,0.0027784863,0.00318109,0.000014092599,0.0000107204205,0.000028018378,0.0044354876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986557,0.0001725801,0.00048744451,0.00022187523,0.00016933144,0.00029306926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987944,0.000088312474,0.0005674256,0.00009603381,0.00033587214,0.00011797867],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006776085,0.0001307758,0.00032811798,0.00017261697,0.00023442364,0.00013738294,0.00015149718,0.00025316176,0.0021981734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011563608,0.00014878603,0.00013059296,0.00015839563,0.00029459782,0.00021351772,0.000015527175,0.00025444425,0.000027815357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046133113,0.0002814981,0.0042002886,0.00001060636,0.00011962291,0.00012825023,0.0061988337,4.3327958e-8,0.0007974052,0.0047159162,0.6390038,0.34408242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005354736,0.001752066,0.25603518,0.000121616395,0.00007023993,0.0041762427,0.0076113413,0.0000020242092,0.00011551711,0.009655391,0.7147086,0.00039700128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006892228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34368542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024066696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027433969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99871397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794335591","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12245","title":"‘I'm happy to own my implicit biases’: Public encounters with the implicit association test","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Implicit-association test; Implicit attitude; Psychology; Prejudice (legal term); Social psychology; Implicit bias; Test (biology); Association (psychology); Cognitive bias; In-group favoritism; Social group; Cognition; Social identity theory","score_opus":0.03166434290622567,"score_gpt":0.3608443752534918,"score_spread":0.3291800323472661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794335591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7721199,0.00015990055,0.000649925,0.1262538,0.0030064231,0.00038749212,0.00004345626,0.00006534744,0.09731376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716576,0.00013778872,0.00012016637,0.019535223,0.0068180943,0.000019573563,0.0000022065237,0.00003239892,0.001676958],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969014,0.0006022075,0.0005985762,0.000329794,0.0007036669,0.0008643437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967519,0.00067132333,0.0008365004,0.00014852172,0.0013170075,0.00027473844],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024597377,0.00018289394,0.00044744872,0.0001724903,0.0016671863,0.00036202298,0.0009810202,0.0003951716,0.0009914931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021502103,0.0001631879,0.0002336959,0.0009591988,0.00093820004,0.00038832464,0.00005559702,0.00063597155,0.00017856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019127651,0.00039377788,0.020969367,0.0000024377107,0.00026252627,0.000085384,0.021525512,1.5530601e-7,0.002071826,0.0032265824,0.87942785,0.071843326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010799068,0.0012996345,0.29810676,0.000055822555,0.000058427257,0.0004019308,0.01095865,2.831482e-7,0.000013388021,0.0017334096,0.68600255,0.00028926643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012421248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010238016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27713737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000414698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025252032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890406325","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12279","title":"The transformative and informative nature of elections: Representation, schism, and exit","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Identity (music); Democracy; Schism; Perception; Social psychology; Political science; Transformative learning; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Politics; Psychology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.017866985201010554,"score_gpt":0.3961342008996192,"score_spread":0.37826721569860866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890406325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8943537,0.002668465,0.00030107825,0.011125253,0.0016141237,0.00019223573,0.000010737579,0.00001263348,0.08972177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99096304,0.0070373933,0.000117231175,0.00090420095,0.0008151505,0.0000031141933,5.422334e-7,0.0000050498793,0.00015429061],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998767,0.00035366308,0.00042387657,0.00008389848,0.00018372221,0.00018781915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875885,0.00018398029,0.00039756284,0.000035481422,0.00056452927,0.000059614056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087140163,0.000061068284,0.00019645703,0.00010023274,0.0011479146,0.00006311214,0.00016984367,0.0002386021,0.000059645994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035340685,0.00005646262,0.00006763918,0.00037902896,0.002575011,0.0003930083,0.0000142772005,0.0004541011,0.0000020391635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068223523,0.000157383,0.0036669334,0.000013751308,0.0003984341,0.000016925933,0.268822,3.6234393e-8,0.00041448744,0.07799704,0.1410727,0.5067581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023660103,0.0010176167,0.5300467,0.00008418776,0.00006052789,0.00086025713,0.10606794,0.0000011984578,0.0001321551,0.11840338,0.24074519,0.00021480619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022824139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010690056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52637976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016908483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005129373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9487735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891617466","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12278","title":"System justification: Experimental evidence, its contextual nature, and implications for social change","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"System justification; Status quo; Ignorance; Legitimacy; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Extant taxon; Status quo bias; Positive economics; Resistance (ecology); Social influence; Political science; Law; Politics; Ideology; Economics","score_opus":0.15534967412786901,"score_gpt":0.48083132554335734,"score_spread":0.32548165141548835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891617466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7778396,0.023296593,0.0019787191,0.13541737,0.012088725,0.001968559,0.00024268607,0.00018115113,0.04698657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896804,0.00074361503,0.0001634261,0.002205155,0.0068286336,0.00005792647,0.0000029461742,0.000011573605,0.0003063112],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988087,0.00020610343,0.00037600478,0.00017173922,0.00017633446,0.00026116412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984681,0.00014987747,0.00037361687,0.00004522072,0.0008481211,0.00011507646],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007576387,0.00007842752,0.00021967023,0.00005933841,0.0020026537,0.00014464461,0.0002377614,0.00034241978,0.00007272464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023832906,0.0000985452,0.0001768235,0.00018867805,0.00062575215,0.0003849734,0.000017088625,0.00029862556,0.00001263811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001969601,0.00030209802,0.00042396938,0.000035306235,0.00016735154,0.000010053237,0.07324578,1.15599645e-8,0.003177937,0.36698866,0.5149948,0.040457092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024298585,0.0006140526,0.1965273,0.00028607124,0.0001517391,0.0011319052,0.08850562,0.000004610117,0.00014762313,0.0021723576,0.7075741,0.0004547626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000103203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001545621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3648163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014735035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010135941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892346574","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12273","title":"Rethinking current models in social psychology: A Bayesian framework to understand dramatic social change","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Social psychology; Psychology; Social change; Normative; Probabilistic logic; Bayesian probability; Pace; Sociology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.27072131209155126,"score_gpt":0.4701196072151156,"score_spread":0.19939829512356433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892346574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9508851,0.0018362897,0.012616267,0.015805485,0.007569569,0.0005815386,0.000059464583,0.000067819,0.010578442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820521,0.00016147207,0.00079624524,0.0066857105,0.010126445,0.000026083153,0.000007057864,0.00005739992,0.00008747208],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598515,0.0008211667,0.0011836948,0.00058188813,0.0004751323,0.0009529756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985071,0.00009837843,0.00071019446,0.00015584147,0.0003307437,0.00019777488],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010768252,0.0003376932,0.00093550514,0.00037294565,0.000761196,0.00015968473,0.00075394614,0.00086139963,0.0014181706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009113831,0.00038136024,0.00039363993,0.0007882522,0.0006229924,0.0003039358,0.00009422852,0.0016960608,0.00010417256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012286607,0.0013126064,0.002166791,0.00005894978,0.00034230738,0.00053732464,0.3890813,3.8969054e-7,0.00012673851,0.05151671,0.16401151,0.38961673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028653238,0.00076872355,0.47006595,0.0003485582,0.0000836603,0.0007640246,0.005652425,0.00001019717,9.1051385e-7,0.5149758,0.00391909,0.0005453348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014528862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051488343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46789917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017488653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053278753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899678614","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12291","title":"Perceiving time through group‐based glasses: Collective temporal orientation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Future orientation; Orientation (vector space); Perspective (graphical); Social cognition; Cognition; Focus group; Developmental psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.058025297055412796,"score_gpt":0.4203665206903367,"score_spread":0.3623412236349239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899678614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.769385,0.0006073138,0.006270508,0.0023057114,0.0027013633,0.00037721443,0.000052154435,0.00007764389,0.21822311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905489,0.000024863417,0.0019647062,0.0020323868,0.0026453054,0.000017485767,0.000015028937,0.000043168962,0.002708123],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966568,0.00093009556,0.0007535175,0.00053333206,0.0004867445,0.0006395463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981668,0.00020699116,0.00055670086,0.00017790582,0.00072528253,0.00016630383],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009652127,0.0002212949,0.00055325165,0.00021567455,0.0005628957,0.00011495039,0.00053663435,0.00040195693,0.011090032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020612241,0.00023651271,0.00032590484,0.00079117087,0.0011308132,0.0003393882,0.000046525314,0.0008665145,0.0006937724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008596535,0.0071363305,0.021882476,0.00003402978,0.0012995015,0.0038758933,0.03328632,9.668223e-7,0.013631788,0.005398432,0.8169434,0.08791435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0066596773,0.004598167,0.91047835,0.000079310514,0.000053593405,0.002593602,0.0032316858,0.000007627794,0.000032254335,0.020668356,0.051142048,0.00045535425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002605858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059908052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8885958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020779307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000124775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.989814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901101079","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12294","title":"Social psychological research on prejudice as collective action supporting emergent ingroup members","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian National University; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Ingroups and outgroups; Prejudice (legal term); Outgroup; Social psychology; Psychology; Mainstream; Conversation; Collective action; Group conflict; Social group; Social identity theory; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.2616414378223606,"score_gpt":0.573023587688977,"score_spread":0.3113821498666164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901101079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66832346,0.00007357601,0.000046814937,0.009859959,0.0036539629,0.00024949716,0.000005226951,0.000046553676,0.31774092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981242,0.00023509732,0.00007981438,0.0031561777,0.012175007,0.000021867247,0.0000027321755,0.000036539648,0.003050762],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99310064,0.0030043654,0.0009702394,0.0005685029,0.001214437,0.0011418178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967606,0.00033479824,0.00082924945,0.00011587306,0.0016832097,0.00027626407],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060205963,0.00020161376,0.0005681552,0.00039503045,0.0039182105,0.00016907461,0.00080344296,0.000844704,0.004448835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016318286,0.0002426128,0.00034020244,0.0014163204,0.003076382,0.00032048306,0.00007289414,0.0017837385,0.00029056045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025006158,0.0014675407,0.0008055609,0.00000770472,0.00026414267,0.00038335234,0.047228567,1.8322231e-7,0.0017949046,0.018230148,0.8009761,0.12634116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054693124,0.012355104,0.26102343,0.00013406634,0.00011084367,0.001310993,0.08350136,0.0000016075724,0.00014391392,0.14152528,0.4934955,0.000928607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011673841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002012665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31469017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005667592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002931044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901678059","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12303","title":"Managing a moral identity in debt advice conversations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Debt; Conversation; Negotiation; Social psychology; Psychology; Public relations; Business; Political science; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.06536381299804125,"score_gpt":0.4670548926480924,"score_spread":0.40169107965005113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901678059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9022098,0.00056346797,0.00037913697,0.020801699,0.0029535266,0.00018558475,0.000009071073,0.000030709572,0.07286698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99305785,0.0004041421,0.00015213707,0.0039581745,0.001702182,0.000006719217,0.0000016793128,0.000012282014,0.00070483465],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984825,0.00036940147,0.0005675435,0.00011076722,0.00015441811,0.00031532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991253,0.00007969876,0.0003479173,0.000048683392,0.00034869998,0.000049706945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080405537,0.00006690574,0.00025582252,0.00013339384,0.0007043305,0.000011663383,0.00017678065,0.00012816077,0.0007914617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012668497,0.00008167848,0.00007438112,0.00026310395,0.0002100455,0.0002881841,0.000058082707,0.000550484,0.00010504106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022097921,0.00022164138,0.62064964,0.0000556861,0.00015310012,0.00040722644,0.020433228,2.0253805e-7,0.00009589584,0.009945708,0.3201601,0.027656622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018486155,0.00009179471,0.952533,0.00013490468,0.000021039918,0.00007159164,0.004313559,0.0000015901069,5.237542e-7,0.028805442,0.012097457,0.00008045115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005957275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063358964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3318834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007902003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060984385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86659503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967632537","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12338","title":"What really helps? Divergent implications of talking to someone with an empathic mindset versus similar experience for shame and self‐evaluation in the wake of an embarrassing event","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Mindset; Empathy; Feeling; Social psychology; Empathic concern; Perception; Task (project management); Surprise; Shame; Perspective-taking; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.06923283522717409,"score_gpt":0.427128993512186,"score_spread":0.35789615828501187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967632537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971149,0.00029309004,0.0002731323,0.0009997163,0.0006416239,0.0005478571,0.000033385073,0.0000036064785,0.000092700284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983701,0.00006342497,0.0011576572,0.00022340118,0.00010379106,0.00004808513,0.000014277903,0.000013056646,0.0000061943265],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852383,0.00032630106,0.0005034817,0.00022105055,0.0002294056,0.00019594685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989619,0.00006216485,0.00043095901,0.00017700993,0.00029938054,0.00006857712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010578287,0.00009059972,0.00026935534,0.000129391,0.00011985435,0.000042351192,0.0002459678,0.00012024543,0.0000940015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032016,0.000086809785,0.000064860535,0.00019967099,0.000105218154,0.00034173732,0.000017210012,0.00017927321,6.548753e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034444984,0.0063960487,0.04190855,0.00007485999,0.0002621911,0.00008481096,0.32469308,0.00010678446,0.042185824,0.0017993543,0.00075997645,0.578284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033866044,0.0028489723,0.9619846,0.00011473359,0.00008851461,0.00041536047,0.03047042,0.000012151436,0.000060445924,0.0003812332,0.00012575989,0.0001112264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007928117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048127136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.920076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035185454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006388638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35400003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975177052","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12342","title":"Empathy choice in physicians and non‐physicians","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Empathy; Psychology; Trait; Cognition; Perspective-taking; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.013501618695427162,"score_gpt":0.3400529504579027,"score_spread":0.3265513317624755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975177052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98940074,0.00059966586,0.000022441282,0.004442635,0.0008804018,0.0001251372,0.0000026287323,0.000005034335,0.004521291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99173236,0.00031924664,0.00011476134,0.0063032936,0.0011392453,0.0000019839995,0.0000034916798,0.000012975912,0.00037263695],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991331,0.0000557875,0.00031807265,0.00013210012,0.0001647846,0.00019612514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995318,0.000047067613,0.00019272562,0.000057023,0.00009960425,0.000071803035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026224786,0.00006997915,0.00035918938,0.00008495692,0.00003707825,0.000011273801,0.00006829116,0.0001378141,0.00009514543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010550623,0.00008315396,0.00008769829,0.00016550516,0.00012251266,0.0001014788,0.000009588406,0.0005213999,0.00001884371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038033602,0.0021254485,0.08589785,0.00015188524,0.00013210665,0.0007588511,0.049609087,9.122117e-7,0.008120202,0.000078467325,0.03737144,0.8153734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003063664,0.0004087624,0.9834975,0.00035283825,0.000035935805,0.0009481868,0.006639751,0.000002629636,0.000034461085,0.00034082663,0.004598703,0.000076714234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007069361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006097579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8975997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034119206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007165367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33909202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979571174","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12340","title":"Participating in a new group and the identification processes: The quest for a positive social identity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Basketball; Social psychology; Identity (music); Social identity theory; Value (mathematics); Identification (biology); Group identification; Collective identity; Social group; Immigration; Group (periodic table); Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.03432984393506476,"score_gpt":0.40482083095362265,"score_spread":0.37049098701855787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979571174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9460206,0.0012005095,0.0012818987,0.04306775,0.0017918338,0.00083900726,0.000012083806,0.000013584693,0.005772703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99532706,0.00031227205,0.000042229072,0.002113535,0.001808028,0.0000548264,0.0000016831324,0.000011140863,0.0003292226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786043,0.0007927796,0.0005953854,0.0001859601,0.00024909826,0.00031636632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985423,0.0004720135,0.0006219797,0.000047713358,0.00026809113,0.00004789024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003582783,0.000083075174,0.00030113888,0.000051323193,0.0008422112,0.00022871907,0.0004213846,0.00018161208,0.00008435731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009706518,0.000069492016,0.00013906759,0.00037337688,0.001048961,0.00045390398,0.000030253548,0.00036321266,0.000006853307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019976224,0.00050999544,0.01221072,0.00006527362,0.000277415,0.00003124936,0.3532159,5.720774e-7,0.00065020536,0.4470833,0.043717396,0.14024034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008574578,0.00026630823,0.6577749,0.000117775875,0.00011024256,0.00015612022,0.045936808,0.0000052205655,0.000005633772,0.2593536,0.027441602,0.00025717582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021603804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014263668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6455642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063069776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017309125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7959461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990123552","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12355","title":"Mobilizing IDEAS in the Scottish Referendum: Predicting voting intention and well‐being with the Identity‐Deprivation‐Efficacy‐Action‐Subjective well‐being model","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Collective action; Social psychology; Referendum; Relative deprivation; Psychology; Voting; Social identity theory; Collective identity; Social identity approach; Structural equation modeling; Collective efficacy; Politics; Social group; Political science","score_opus":0.031186177391052897,"score_gpt":0.3483719014404853,"score_spread":0.3171857240494324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990123552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9557783,0.00022516868,0.0019744018,0.0045747026,0.0010473855,0.00036417152,9.518187e-7,0.000026506956,0.036008403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99689776,0.00031254144,0.00013527981,0.001509219,0.00086716335,0.000010918215,0.000001706955,0.000023202214,0.00024218719],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970108,0.0010483759,0.0006160362,0.00032826103,0.0005392947,0.00045723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984204,0.00038795362,0.0006975967,0.000105538384,0.00032665482,0.00006184607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035287573,0.0001548422,0.00034613642,0.0001640836,0.0012265978,0.00033275675,0.0005837738,0.00025681383,0.000089776724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033763752,0.00013290666,0.00014233142,0.0006112723,0.000541967,0.0010042294,0.00006245487,0.001169364,0.000013770487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008972871,0.0008171346,0.46660212,0.00006032707,0.00054289907,0.00021654727,0.33230612,0.00026539393,0.0021666035,0.11463178,0.009964629,0.07152914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024509474,0.0002813619,0.86881846,0.00038338246,0.00009170436,0.00062091113,0.09205373,0.00022586815,0.0000067603696,0.032966845,0.0017998975,0.00030012897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013776552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006557504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40221635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001511496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000081531005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94341224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004972017","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12365","title":"We are all in this together: The role of individuals’ social identities in problematic engagement with video games and the internet","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Impact of Technology on Adolescents","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Loneliness; Psychology; The Internet; Context (archaeology); Identification (biology); Social psychology; Social engagement; Internet users; Social identity theory; Developmental psychology; Social group; World Wide Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.034975626376222826,"score_gpt":0.3292593643779855,"score_spread":0.29428373800176266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004972017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90433365,0.002428918,0.000013968444,0.08891012,0.00011180807,0.0004096385,0.000007090032,0.0000133892,0.0037713943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965063,0.0010017463,0.00006552968,0.0021593098,0.00016410623,0.000010196137,3.0002826e-7,0.000011410046,0.00008109967],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974536,0.0012134812,0.0005441759,0.00013277338,0.00037216695,0.00028380443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989869,0.0001459645,0.0007005247,0.00005011592,0.00007637908,0.000040125466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023933481,0.000101434205,0.000426594,0.00009223911,0.00020972751,0.00009638343,0.00062729645,0.00017705657,0.00011969142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038966988,0.000077170684,0.00008402945,0.0002861241,0.0017002869,0.00017165867,0.00009471719,0.0008303768,0.0000023615792],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006921194,0.00049895514,0.20701306,0.000113931506,0.00043109685,0.00021447797,0.6765008,0.0000021988576,0.0001130247,0.009767267,0.04325984,0.061393227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009468901,0.00035196773,0.62739813,0.00073415117,0.00012268801,0.00021975781,0.26415598,0.000005883693,0.000042368327,0.08508578,0.01212466,0.00028971583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006672744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021313974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4203851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052959185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084522646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6264778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016977417","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12379","title":"The Bullshitting Frequency Scale: Development and psychometric properties","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sincerity; Psychology; Honesty; Scale (ratio); Need for cognition; Cognition; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.06893376235682114,"score_gpt":0.3354935208733679,"score_spread":0.2665597585165468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016977417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91648155,0.0035525905,0.00021044552,0.0327964,0.00060083007,0.00012168531,0.0000013551879,0.00002153264,0.046213593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99335617,0.0014920533,0.000639524,0.0036476874,0.0006779705,6.009439e-7,2.2941096e-7,0.000006241658,0.00017954645],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998741,0.00017923435,0.0004369898,0.000073299205,0.00033046736,0.00023903254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923736,0.000049603314,0.00031002396,0.000024890749,0.00019801476,0.00018011284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012255828,0.000057809422,0.00014538226,0.00005460708,0.0012716678,0.00025803148,0.00024203437,0.00008781968,0.0000834754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092552963,0.00004989431,0.000045547247,0.0004006313,0.00033386934,0.00027400034,0.000017415347,0.00026820504,0.000015943408],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036626778,0.00002973825,0.00088018074,0.000010000763,0.000034638528,0.000013799998,0.10030712,1.34468e-7,0.000109213026,0.0011292201,0.031778686,0.8656706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001435751,0.00017345337,0.22985272,0.000080995356,0.000018313607,0.00037130652,0.053662457,0.0000018614331,0.00004956163,0.0011562179,0.71294636,0.0002510062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034905523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000096919466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8654196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003094401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018109014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9780769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111850786","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12431","title":"Tweeting about sexism motivates further activism: A social identity perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Collective action; Social psychology; Social identity theory; Silence; Psychology; Social media; Perspective (graphical); Social activism; Identity (music); Action (physics); Feminism; Mediation; Collective identity; Social movement; Social identity approach; Social group; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05301725731157875,"score_gpt":0.4027459007213018,"score_spread":0.34972864340972304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111850786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8993319,0.0007934611,0.00032580533,0.06347548,0.0019903416,0.00017320181,0.000029289895,0.00006688855,0.033813592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98207784,0.00027942559,0.00014467277,0.0047007804,0.012663656,0.0000031578443,0.0000012136378,0.00003086766,0.00009836603],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718714,0.00085992826,0.00048822083,0.00023518065,0.00064953434,0.0005800039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826443,0.00021574946,0.00057283626,0.000037797698,0.00062126707,0.00028793217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007116674,0.00014577854,0.0004902392,0.000068979105,0.0011300149,0.0002020137,0.0004967783,0.0003793857,0.0007078434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015553135,0.00019501032,0.000350994,0.00046559834,0.0009827528,0.0005391151,0.000048229864,0.00086022646,0.00004458016],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019669301,0.00036716985,0.008337447,0.000026263479,0.00044502277,0.0006815736,0.83185583,6.02352e-7,0.0018938594,0.06016019,0.048412286,0.04762304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036508148,0.00037808562,0.21673167,0.00009554,0.00023819308,0.00022706042,0.570571,0.0000011596047,0.00012203007,0.10323613,0.10396822,0.00078007823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015789991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004078123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26128483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021287458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032868586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8691275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117037993","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12436","title":"A multilevel analysis of LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender) rights support across 77 countries: The role of contact and country laws","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Transgender; Psychology; Prejudice (legal term); Social psychology; Homosexuality; Gender studies; Multilevel model; Sociology","score_opus":0.07221736434241792,"score_gpt":0.42855388862185195,"score_spread":0.356336524279434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117037993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.981721,0.004671383,0.00021517677,0.0033463384,0.00071095437,0.00024107323,0.001543006,0.00001465619,0.007536427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947164,0.0014794088,0.000029920417,0.0027905807,0.00073208,0.0000048577344,0.000020343203,0.000026193255,0.0002002274],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969059,0.00048766859,0.001362006,0.0003190856,0.00041015292,0.00051518355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977163,0.00024283468,0.0011714856,0.00019034676,0.0004419038,0.00023711065],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009188033,0.00020521853,0.0011018717,0.00017042556,0.00034938983,0.000055940855,0.00052469654,0.00040410183,0.0013528031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066042216,0.00019923793,0.00038930555,0.0005928509,0.00077352923,0.00015395605,0.000032790296,0.0006273636,0.000014174044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0064542056,0.0034730355,0.34775448,0.0013868306,0.021643892,0.002146786,0.2532156,0.000015374739,0.0044086482,0.021655472,0.25286603,0.084979616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004982352,0.0008770627,0.88690877,0.0000259981,0.0018205501,0.0011021945,0.005185098,0.000012099723,0.000022290342,0.0016486209,0.09711864,0.00029633305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004757602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031005626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5391543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031232878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016538143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121610184","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12445","title":"Battling ingroup bias with effective intergroup leadership","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Superordinate goals; In-group favoritism; Psychology; Group conflict; Social psychology; Social identity theory; Identity (music); Ingroups and outgroups; Collective identity; Social group; Political science","score_opus":0.09395246287003203,"score_gpt":0.37402323447710084,"score_spread":0.28007077160706884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121610184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8638855,0.0035930243,0.0023666709,0.013990814,0.0052322163,0.00023970737,0.000008368713,0.000073570045,0.110610105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99035406,0.00042099823,0.00046517607,0.0046459027,0.0031187646,0.000009124874,0.0000031911165,0.00003310725,0.0009497038],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663514,0.0014384589,0.00056121364,0.00031995677,0.00043941548,0.00060583535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809116,0.00036613486,0.0005211509,0.00009384605,0.00074116053,0.00018655969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015247868,0.0001625637,0.0005354025,0.00013029944,0.000696348,0.00016811636,0.00042317953,0.00038924286,0.00082966354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008155673,0.00018617281,0.0002967971,0.00062365184,0.0010220389,0.0003443442,0.000038304253,0.0009209623,0.00003691778],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011614515,0.001486202,0.01972671,0.000056490448,0.0011159641,0.00787519,0.0738933,0.0000021451071,0.0035866494,0.022168854,0.09866692,0.7702601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008826311,0.0021357858,0.47732913,0.000891516,0.00027986564,0.009578564,0.11874531,9.886122e-7,0.00031072125,0.02163,0.35909408,0.001177712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028756107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023084364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7690824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015447193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020968507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90842336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128082335","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12447","title":"‘You can’t bullshit a bullshitter’ (or can you?): Bullshitting frequency predicts receptivity to various types of misleading information","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Receptivity; Style (visual arts); Cognition; Cognitive style; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030151087384354062,"score_gpt":0.33900299620453855,"score_spread":0.3088519088201845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128082335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89793086,0.00026394255,0.0014688232,0.028437426,0.0023795222,0.00034986986,0.00019391546,0.000056990488,0.06891866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98979163,0.00041400612,0.0023503087,0.0054535894,0.0008404278,0.000001958346,0.000018917146,0.00001583892,0.001113306],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973093,0.00039060987,0.0010134187,0.00013867063,0.00066026044,0.0004876926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976087,0.00011447804,0.00089416513,0.000109779765,0.0009517186,0.00032113344],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017309599,0.00013870966,0.00044866683,0.0002172819,0.000507361,0.00022077051,0.0003627891,0.0002915102,0.0010283678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031903756,0.00016307394,0.00015783729,0.0006990442,0.00020911197,0.0007298234,0.000045073055,0.00046497092,0.000030448544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034087608,0.00042250432,0.00256262,0.00015736686,0.00030067877,0.00044394782,0.33070523,0.00003919154,0.002018423,0.0033556556,0.13490833,0.52474517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008644081,0.0017766531,0.25863194,0.0015326437,0.00033848148,0.0055597345,0.12427878,0.000015550555,0.001616779,0.0065418663,0.5894036,0.0016598552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016174719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037818758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5230853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021538381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010001381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147639137","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12470","title":"A trouble shared is a trouble halved: The role of family identification and identification with humankind in well‐being during the COVID‐19 pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"COVID-19 and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Feeling; Mental health; Psychology; Anxiety; Identification (biology); Social psychology; Identity (music); Embodied cognition; Physical health; Pandemic; Developmental psychology; Social identity theory; Clinical psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychiatry; Social group; Medicine; Disease","score_opus":0.056433624101000855,"score_gpt":0.3952407684258471,"score_spread":0.33880714432484627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147639137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99045765,0.0044137677,0.00020285227,0.0028171965,0.00035293223,0.0002750451,0.000023192542,0.000009637091,0.0014477049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963978,0.0006703016,0.000023039607,0.0019658883,0.00020252663,0.000027482993,0.00000933032,0.000019727086,0.0006838984],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784815,0.0004791355,0.0008170613,0.00030621968,0.00025944944,0.00028999778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865943,0.00014827003,0.00073267444,0.00021209229,0.0001647136,0.00008280589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013056374,0.0001150983,0.00030699928,0.000120464785,0.00041305856,0.00009305095,0.000299209,0.00015149101,0.00026344738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054372154,0.00010094671,0.00010245322,0.00037127238,0.0002542911,0.00016711738,0.000039768816,0.0005055136,0.000008556472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003726397,0.0021619257,0.6225592,0.00039889725,0.00071425695,0.0008319413,0.11936481,0.000015184265,0.11611844,0.006248731,0.00917884,0.11868137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038224955,0.000095209245,0.9672189,0.00006317354,0.000057322795,0.0030362096,0.013012205,0.000002991424,0.00016646468,0.0046929633,0.007723641,0.000108449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011374882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001676425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34465966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019142086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002392393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41164872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162420774","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12462","title":"Factors promoting greater preoccupation with a secret","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04452141751000348,"score_gpt":0.4027265097591212,"score_spread":0.35820509224911773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162420774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811099,0.0003076462,0.0035172447,0.0007272951,0.0009559305,0.0000848513,0.0000113598935,0.00001969168,0.013266039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974872,0.000014430929,0.00037244134,0.00024191612,0.00045035654,0.0000031217658,0.000026725933,0.000024129175,0.0013796994],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871165,0.00027104383,0.00040802537,0.00018779121,0.00018081462,0.000240708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991036,0.000047539113,0.00041507924,0.00008112958,0.0002847794,0.000067896515],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026688023,0.000109762856,0.00025701433,0.00007628457,0.00019995985,0.000052634372,0.00012010673,0.00023154545,0.0011133341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003849662,0.00010547556,0.00012290955,0.00022240833,0.00011179671,0.00013520347,0.000015810718,0.00049624837,0.000016108555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021838295,0.0004324093,0.9498237,0.000017457201,0.0005289149,0.0018805448,0.014459567,0.0000040020273,0.00019859706,0.0014225384,0.006845956,0.024167934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001458093,0.00021111226,0.9906874,0.000050359027,0.00007715948,0.0033255443,0.0016266918,0.0000032986677,0.000014592688,0.00067830365,0.0017340204,0.00013346424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008927008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003523797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040863667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035913858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059104197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169036453","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12476","title":"The malleability of collective memories: One year after the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Identity, Memory, and Therapy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Collective memory; Malleability; Social psychology; Social change; Group (periodic table); Collective behavior; Social group; Developmental psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.023192959762015096,"score_gpt":0.33381440728723233,"score_spread":0.31062144752521725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169036453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9617908,0.005799365,0.000081069265,0.0053051086,0.0031792552,0.00019199286,0.000029839159,0.000006094485,0.023616478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956203,0.0011140148,0.000060590464,0.00056699966,0.00088198966,0.000015235077,0.0000014930349,0.000017802695,0.0017215507],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735045,0.0012181512,0.0006722676,0.00020029159,0.00026268547,0.00029616032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859035,0.00023871414,0.00040865282,0.00021556397,0.0005067389,0.00003995646],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016100262,0.0000976834,0.00035283572,0.00006150979,0.00025136024,0.000042605272,0.00032756128,0.00020108621,0.001280683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025894813,0.00008777905,0.00022692776,0.00044339008,0.0005878865,0.0000787389,0.000032612716,0.00062675594,0.000015895013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.024609784,0.01113948,0.18899925,0.00016059478,0.0050343173,0.004323808,0.10946004,0.0000054939132,0.004604704,0.032501355,0.37949526,0.23966591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001825554,0.00019504644,0.9487644,0.000041924934,0.00004243006,0.0006098307,0.0064883125,1.294542e-7,0.00005302155,0.032206863,0.009683172,0.00008932691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014591198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002414756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75976515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013214584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017890763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171485778","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12469","title":"I’ll scratch your back if you give me a compliment: Exploring psychological mechanisms underlying compliments’ effects on compliance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Toronto Metropolitan University; Mount Royal University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Compliance (psychology); Social psychology; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Norm of reciprocity; Mood; Priming (agriculture); Norm (philosophy)","score_opus":0.2795089990120052,"score_gpt":0.44648662638895903,"score_spread":0.16697762737695382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171485778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8031596,0.002308555,0.0101983575,0.027395457,0.013047672,0.0009772757,0.000062107,0.0002236933,0.14262727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97726107,0.0011758354,0.0054665096,0.013959804,0.0013081939,0.000036021243,0.000008197643,0.00006556483,0.00071878673],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99380875,0.0018110222,0.001118076,0.0008355287,0.0012212495,0.0012053977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704,0.00046248003,0.00096284767,0.00029182807,0.0007778366,0.00046501882],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018276187,0.00038903207,0.0010535353,0.0001830795,0.001951688,0.0002964864,0.0011693743,0.0006229259,0.0008851957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004125667,0.000513095,0.0005102811,0.00084415055,0.0012223434,0.0005922005,0.00012618751,0.0015850761,0.0004174088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025468273,0.010510281,0.004959242,0.00029951593,0.0029130953,0.022127356,0.05810798,0.00005789419,0.11595677,0.23066719,0.10934979,0.44250405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015751347,0.002929673,0.48622122,0.0024704214,0.0003410585,0.0036840097,0.034184035,0.0000060862258,0.0013699229,0.41114783,0.0394601,0.002434284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008304875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057574955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48126197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036484268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016833795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179165981","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12481","title":"Communicating group norms through election results","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Normative; Perception; Social psychology; Democracy; Identity (music); Democratic legitimacy; Voting; Social identity theory; Psychology; Political science; Collective identity; Social group; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.051172577035852394,"score_gpt":0.4040350487827297,"score_spread":0.35286247174687735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179165981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.403036,0.0036023527,0.0012987035,0.0335723,0.006865807,0.00015183048,0.000022542674,0.000083468134,0.551367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846573,0.004054715,0.0016621628,0.005030304,0.0033837142,0.000003945411,0.000012765376,0.000022230894,0.0011728941],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970129,0.0012099268,0.00077753933,0.00022512345,0.00033865354,0.0004358447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830896,0.00020010605,0.0006467856,0.00013324706,0.0006155041,0.00009541033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015488984,0.00010446444,0.00037593962,0.000051930874,0.0011761163,0.00011728031,0.00050895684,0.0003743272,0.0003846038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096281007,0.00013386895,0.00027896918,0.00055341306,0.0006281013,0.0003783231,0.000053677082,0.0008248775,0.000032296568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006239818,0.0015016166,0.0014225177,0.0000143584075,0.0003875069,0.0012837283,0.07844414,5.8567053e-7,0.007038541,0.051810496,0.39819354,0.459279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002685903,0.00028674852,0.061743096,0.00008028111,0.00004023735,0.0017614504,0.016456036,3.120585e-7,0.00005429221,0.03675152,0.87988055,0.0002595906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012690664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045347977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5816213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012295465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014351009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9045854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206551659","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12519","title":"People prefer to diversify across different types of prosocial behaviour","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Casual; Psychology; Social psychology; Helping behavior; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.04119979829542892,"score_gpt":0.3921544987503774,"score_spread":0.3509547004549485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206551659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99177814,0.0003324476,0.000004955308,0.0018634192,0.0015189354,0.00020970059,0.00014807204,0.00001109358,0.004133219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986124,0.00009893806,0.00006766859,0.00032848565,0.00039610246,0.000021047837,0.0000027954338,0.000014265981,0.00045831036],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983722,0.0002884075,0.00044609446,0.0001738559,0.0003697712,0.00034968145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992314,0.000038462797,0.00040189378,0.00005521163,0.00016605335,0.00010697731],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006166286,0.000092659844,0.00040655537,0.000059448972,0.0013403444,0.00004106389,0.0004644466,0.00008621524,0.0006466963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006280237,0.00012368598,0.0002069987,0.00019820967,0.00029427433,0.00011434305,0.0002843644,0.0003448132,0.000006995648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074272975,0.0026820004,0.45619804,0.000015230613,0.000284504,0.00019633838,0.41290566,0.0000113478145,0.004468545,0.0032522287,0.08558555,0.033657838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015535477,0.00074622344,0.8986132,0.000014448194,0.00006150529,0.00008633766,0.08513042,7.637542e-8,0.00018064766,0.0010580546,0.012289767,0.00026575162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015373374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033218085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44241518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030203073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000772971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212896572","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12527","title":"Authority, conformity and obedience: Applying Friedrich’s theory of authority to the classics","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Obedience; Conformity; Milgram experiment; Legitimacy; Psychology; Social psychology; Interpretation (philosophy); Power (physics); Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05031489390333131,"score_gpt":0.38396686233731675,"score_spread":0.3336519684339854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212896572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9028646,0.0018657822,0.0014376857,0.030147182,0.005451241,0.00073275954,0.000103435465,0.000044743676,0.057352573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99467003,0.0002921164,0.00035802007,0.0032553547,0.0009357241,0.00003119082,8.6491815e-7,0.000013294811,0.00044339712],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610907,0.0016797638,0.0006874464,0.00025507913,0.0007816337,0.00048701535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981468,0.0004039874,0.00074311486,0.00012934234,0.00037351006,0.00020329487],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008773583,0.00012497499,0.00043379908,0.00011867625,0.0030370902,0.00007440274,0.0010880721,0.00022023894,0.00034286152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009342897,0.00014069735,0.00017339064,0.000685115,0.0021340735,0.000245754,0.00024772104,0.0012613166,0.0000051853413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004369653,0.0004634589,0.011282121,0.000018177758,0.00018701777,0.00020633035,0.10093367,0.000010772762,0.0003993112,0.34541717,0.064173244,0.47647178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011386934,0.00045326262,0.34587643,0.000030576382,0.000078379104,0.0006952711,0.0607001,0.0000011601722,0.000007740765,0.15078047,0.43991557,0.00032236706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004635919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042459622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4761494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013981591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030483058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220720101","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12537","title":"Reductions in perceived COVID‐19 threat amid UK’s mass public vaccination programme coincide with reductions in outgroup avoidance (but not prejudice)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Outgroup; Prejudice (legal term); Social psychology; Psychology; Perception; Context (archaeology); Ingroups and outgroups; Social distance; Developmental psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Disease; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.12212339761683423,"score_gpt":0.3346951268896534,"score_spread":0.2125717292728192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220720101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94679517,0.00016712911,0.00031282258,0.048004817,0.0014127105,0.00042062398,0.00006414543,0.000038158756,0.0027844158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99383706,0.0003863987,0.00058481726,0.004115903,0.00036522292,0.00011759314,0.000014977185,0.000024769062,0.00055325346],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966307,0.0009002838,0.00076022913,0.00054791773,0.00057225674,0.0005885566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886644,0.00010591926,0.00053925917,0.00014011843,0.0001316857,0.00021657084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011105475,0.00017837198,0.00038937872,0.00050674874,0.00083171716,0.00007910716,0.00051213446,0.00013970384,0.0008594409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050881103,0.00021605658,0.00013403948,0.00095428753,0.00037977207,0.000401721,0.00006483312,0.0013502658,0.000010246639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011526798,0.024690853,0.07016008,0.00018984843,0.00043912468,0.022375591,0.019989833,0.0061264443,0.44959018,0.035803106,0.13160148,0.22750667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006935035,0.0011513482,0.9347331,0.00004815651,0.000031459334,0.030295895,0.0035821206,0.00002351073,0.0001510091,0.013967526,0.008664526,0.00041631793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029518278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007183904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.864573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007645706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029760523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9410275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285086438","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12558","title":"Effects of intergroup contact on explicit and implicit outgroup attitudes: A longitudinal field study with majority and minority group members","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Outgroup; Psychology; Longitudinal study; Anxiety; Contact theory; Social psychology; Ingroups and outgroups; Quality (philosophy); Association (psychology); Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.018182493098824956,"score_gpt":0.3428535979538106,"score_spread":0.3246711048549856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285086438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923879,0.0006199077,0.000066351175,0.0011927065,0.00097175164,0.00044869792,0.000010770266,0.000017061886,0.004284853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980667,0.00023653632,0.00004354695,0.0010149635,0.00051508873,0.000036322614,0.0000010128388,0.000015939306,0.00006989491],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997242,0.0009521193,0.00054436125,0.00037951898,0.0004951027,0.00038689803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985546,0.0005070485,0.000546484,0.00009202638,0.0001383412,0.00016152003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001224375,0.00018331027,0.00066540105,0.00012953035,0.0008529848,0.00006435368,0.00037927777,0.00016202463,0.00026332602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001595918,0.00020282109,0.00013980175,0.00028271115,0.0003929263,0.00019007736,0.00012380462,0.00083107967,7.350513e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00732043,0.008434916,0.78118813,0.00017123128,0.0015326003,0.0026389014,0.07282789,4.2531428e-7,0.0023562363,0.017201861,0.018750336,0.08757702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004189058,0.010624251,0.9633534,0.000055467808,0.00012532939,0.00054973154,0.017637115,1.9519106e-7,0.000007334385,0.0010275368,0.002206073,0.00022450555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050868243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004425593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18216525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010401394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041559964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82708037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306938082","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12590","title":"Peer charity donation, gratitude, and self‐esteem among left‐behind children","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities","keywords":"Gratitude; Psychology; Social psychology; Donation; Self-esteem; Peer group; Developmental psychology; Law","score_opus":0.015382435609116943,"score_gpt":0.3163445321375551,"score_spread":0.30096209652843814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306938082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9641074,0.000982439,0.00015107282,0.0038825127,0.0030366785,0.00020557054,0.00005998868,0.00006509258,0.027509226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994375,0.00017047438,0.00016452096,0.0018426015,0.0010481968,0.000015005269,0.000021510967,0.000029710847,0.0023330115],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701846,0.0008744736,0.0007037811,0.00041768412,0.0005852032,0.00040038084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987093,0.0000902744,0.0006241596,0.00014472687,0.00027332173,0.00015821162],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017516409,0.00018444398,0.00042465026,0.00019585043,0.00085965503,0.00008959546,0.00037156424,0.00026230994,0.0043913685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010616512,0.00022407684,0.00018176179,0.00015950104,0.00026598142,0.0001934817,0.00008283889,0.0014067182,0.0000295467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037791277,0.0029121486,0.49239194,0.000009631674,0.0008108876,0.00085127424,0.014428656,0.0000087619965,0.0001832178,0.004157865,0.4046342,0.07923349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020587225,0.00055023027,0.9482262,0.000007332957,0.000056826622,0.0089130495,0.0006105202,9.4241125e-7,0.0000011941285,0.004163397,0.03519771,0.0002138466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029020282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000111528316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45583427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007766171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032309814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99651873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308552783","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12596","title":"Purity, politics, and polarization: Political ideology moderates threat‐induced shifts in moral purity beliefs","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Conservatism; Politics; Social psychology; Psychology; Moral standards; Polarization (electrochemistry); Foundation (evidence); Perspective (graphical); Positive economics; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.04530386215412827,"score_gpt":0.3680572296114927,"score_spread":0.3227533674573644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308552783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9429335,0.00082145236,0.0000454573,0.03536329,0.0021017094,0.00018511801,0.000040714574,0.000027945034,0.018480798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99222314,0.00015484646,0.00009456,0.0057008015,0.0015167714,0.000013655066,0.000007979605,0.000022572009,0.0002656758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591804,0.0016480722,0.00075870956,0.00033928698,0.000446632,0.0008892644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893016,0.00016440357,0.00032043713,0.00008613169,0.00022723776,0.0002716161],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001312278,0.00015945369,0.0005588191,0.00025711406,0.0013488922,0.000098454664,0.00050360814,0.00036946932,0.00078514795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037218645,0.00022084825,0.00016193936,0.00042863376,0.0010384371,0.00029179352,0.00017247017,0.00121797,0.000005536485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020939765,0.0011391188,0.11704036,0.00001017993,0.00011858704,0.0010835564,0.016587706,0.0000015208019,0.0005580884,0.8416962,0.01092877,0.010626497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019273036,0.00048469493,0.61238617,0.000013938963,0.000024130319,0.0009307248,0.008220779,0.0000027216618,0.0000037780928,0.36942944,0.006321224,0.0002550697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068308967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00375339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49534583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002736623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026561238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308896286","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12604","title":"Having the right face for the job: The effect of facial width‐to‐height ratio on job selection preferences","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Trait; Perception; Collar; Face (sociological concept); Social psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.030273530946927765,"score_gpt":0.3587332663823963,"score_spread":0.3284597354354685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308896286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96985877,0.0013862087,0.0012149384,0.013389763,0.006803813,0.0012802617,0.00012885094,0.00002397372,0.005913452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945025,0.000026730277,0.000028076956,0.0018104946,0.0013239969,0.00032352327,0.0000053271524,0.000027540587,0.0019518221],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963205,0.0018989138,0.00068132463,0.000312865,0.0003881893,0.00039821255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778813,0.0011313664,0.00064829877,0.00022363053,0.00015761693,0.00005094902],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025195784,0.0001926177,0.00039805658,0.00012472417,0.0027508019,0.000048590227,0.0010544519,0.00018903712,0.0027614078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000107450505,0.00012484605,0.0003783104,0.0003352763,0.00053695234,0.00007913578,0.00006419387,0.001314421,0.000028330356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057578986,0.0007674799,0.03555308,0.000016906282,0.0010481394,0.000080043515,0.0128633855,0.00027433253,0.0013121879,0.017573195,0.79428715,0.1304662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026322415,0.004298178,0.8946859,0.000019337405,0.00027666427,0.001985708,0.0010743884,0.0000039212,0.000036156853,0.0027030702,0.09210182,0.00018257013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045573805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015749877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8591329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007343934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005031392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311309509","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12614","title":"The distinct associations of ingroup attachment and glorification with responses to the coronavirus pandemic: Evidence from a multilevel investigation in 21 countries","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Pandemic; Psychology; Government (linguistics); Coronavirus; Public health; Social psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.22297396204919492,"score_gpt":0.44534784963867086,"score_spread":0.22237388758947593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311309509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99063504,0.0027102043,0.000102939826,0.005730253,0.00040559686,0.00020601698,0.00016590976,0.000004936314,0.000039108916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99882114,0.0003047281,0.00006944478,0.00049103174,0.00014306807,0.000047871195,0.000008821358,0.0000063323814,0.000107560394],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814487,0.00083497714,0.0004546076,0.00015020966,0.00026820847,0.00014713043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983268,0.0008486542,0.00055404473,0.00008380666,0.00015081624,0.00003587696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001174449,0.000074321026,0.00019362418,0.00003976312,0.00054043496,0.000054704997,0.00025980567,0.00005336,0.00008078067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028527863,0.000053450054,0.000040359253,0.0001758871,0.00023897647,0.00008480415,0.000045967918,0.0003399806,0.0000017197586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010628424,0.00008356585,0.9268336,0.0000024522742,0.0000936677,0.000018732235,0.021144552,0.0000061170686,0.00044402733,0.00071828597,0.0034195266,0.04617262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006421406,0.00029014712,0.99080765,0.000047766625,0.00003023117,0.00013819215,0.004448607,0.0000040820632,0.000002931342,0.0012106864,0.0023136765,0.000063891086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021450282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002956687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06397404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009746089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052069285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41566432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385501931","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12676","title":"The utility of nostalgia for unhealthy populations: A systematic review and narrative analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Narrative; Action (physics); Theme (computing); Social connectedness; Social psychology","score_opus":0.17641330358645785,"score_gpt":0.5102851660942443,"score_spread":0.3338718625077865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385501931","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000046195823,0.99549854,0.000082725026,0.0003375813,0.00090491347,0.0025090831,0.00048041865,0.000013076321,0.00012747146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00017492093,0.99857783,0.00004834835,0.00013590249,0.00009945054,0.0003716055,0.0000565108,0.000049722403,0.00048568117],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939102,0.0019792162,0.0031293437,0.00036151896,0.0002495163,0.00037019013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99381083,0.0009788543,0.004179232,0.00033731485,0.0005830889,0.000110676454],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002841684,0.00029996817,0.0047031427,0.0003152171,0.00047279798,0.000047507292,0.0005276851,0.0004508909,0.00017693825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006513457,0.00024588048,0.0017644252,0.0012042961,0.0003762759,0.00005356538,0.000045024884,0.000658412,0.0000112735715],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048099057,0.00024554937,0.000036339294,0.55003935,0.010607949,0.000119524826,0.0013191487,2.772489e-9,4.786528e-8,0.0008897995,0.028785609,0.4079086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026454162,0.0009089644,0.017338851,0.47533354,0.30783737,0.006717928,0.0053066467,5.54527e-7,1.7174303e-8,0.004255126,0.1783081,0.0013474951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006881448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015641474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4065611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041480544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017990568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386592161","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12685","title":"The role of group memberships and school identification on student well‐being","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Identification (biology); Social identity theory; Social psychology; Mediation; Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Association (psychology); Well-being; Longitudinal study; Mental health; Situated; Social group; Developmental psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.02433552628886244,"score_gpt":0.37398466575960576,"score_spread":0.34964913947074333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386592161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9201841,0.0007870584,0.000010787696,0.0054796143,0.0020879586,0.00013798366,0.0000027314866,0.000025309435,0.07128449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949788,0.0025375176,0.000010248021,0.00043080642,0.0011347634,0.000006198564,0.0000012311466,0.000012000595,0.0008884756],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794525,0.0006455635,0.0005464308,0.00016132662,0.0004013446,0.00030009786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885714,0.00027996357,0.0004878367,0.00007448128,0.0001987673,0.00010179481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025927718,0.00007615175,0.00022644969,0.00010693084,0.00092638866,0.00011044799,0.00042235485,0.00018425561,0.0001439814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004040853,0.00007696723,0.0001352248,0.00038309483,0.00069674634,0.0001400958,0.00003405517,0.00037946794,0.00008055092],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046811547,0.0006719845,0.02635287,0.0000142747585,0.00046087653,0.00015477114,0.0563975,0.0000010172298,0.008794288,0.20350009,0.14357296,0.55961126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007045088,0.00021816602,0.7467883,0.0000437835,0.000028075227,0.000072488976,0.037530713,5.2326004e-7,0.000031495973,0.07738471,0.13708653,0.00011069341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019548471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056546315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72043544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000516026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003765756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7125126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388457808","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12695","title":"Why do we never have enough time? Economic inequality fuels the perception of time poverty by aggravating status anxiety","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Poverty; Inequality; Psychology; Economic inequality; Perception; Anxiety; Social psychology; Test (biology); Demographic economics; Social inequality; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.023824204190939544,"score_gpt":0.3347713769932334,"score_spread":0.31094717280229384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388457808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9599324,0.0010804888,0.00023637303,0.010964724,0.0022111007,0.0002656232,0.00033463782,0.000085568354,0.024889074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863989,0.0034782276,0.00011322786,0.0059134173,0.0016137456,0.000013909749,0.00006804504,0.00006103824,0.0023395335],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630934,0.0012120425,0.0011414196,0.00042186351,0.0002985981,0.00061670743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803007,0.00030715863,0.001123935,0.00024725933,0.00015606929,0.00013552007],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001939542,0.00022581988,0.0006099854,0.00013544844,0.00032058728,0.0000690397,0.00040807386,0.0004924945,0.007772949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013126282,0.00021364202,0.0003739876,0.00028586175,0.00034916482,0.0002928973,0.0000535316,0.00089162996,0.0008587549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033482444,0.00020406299,0.0037370115,0.000010437077,0.00022240992,0.00003882149,0.002788837,0.000009561404,0.007212235,0.00015633114,0.8253047,0.15998076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004316454,0.0007141303,0.6216328,0.000116867806,0.0001113729,0.0012756083,0.0033123682,0.0000248475,0.00003060547,0.010818659,0.35715902,0.0004872821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006581166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019978264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6178958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012754711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039644965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389452749","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12707","title":"Canadian politicians' rhetoric on Twitter/X: Analysing prejudice and inclusion towards Muslims using structural topic modelling and rhetorical analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Mitacs; UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Rhetoric; Populism; Prejudice (legal term); Rhetorical question; Sociology; Multiculturalism; Politics; Ideology; Solidarity; Social media; Social psychology; Media studies; Gender studies; Political science; Psychology; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09448230342171532,"score_gpt":0.4291919257504752,"score_spread":0.3347096223287599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389452749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99008465,0.00038800784,0.004951552,0.0030144893,0.00038283056,0.000048516406,0.000007135,0.000014007044,0.0011087947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967929,0.00025077543,0.0015766161,0.0004995559,0.0007994849,4.9159394e-7,0.000004947346,0.000008967182,0.00006622405],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978604,0.00059684773,0.0004283796,0.00024106902,0.0004803959,0.0003929416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989852,0.00017713472,0.00024125159,0.000049683877,0.00024699542,0.0002997769],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001588789,0.00010845626,0.00043895084,0.00087131135,0.0025524322,0.00013539247,0.0001799185,0.00016486403,0.000053074982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015012613,0.00012593527,0.00020257448,0.0018779038,0.00018643,0.0001546989,0.00014101238,0.00029855323,7.688024e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013450936,0.0001364045,0.060117114,0.000049568163,0.0041904314,0.0014246508,0.16709429,0.03394093,0.0003376119,0.015012762,0.0008111104,0.7167506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018819083,0.00025691965,0.6933441,0.00014712123,0.0030252596,0.0003620127,0.013177598,0.09739889,0.0000071260833,0.1831582,0.0062506874,0.0009901429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10141879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037775934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71576047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030013573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022851722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391176893","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12726","title":"Issue Information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Holloway, University of London; University of Massachusetts Amherst; Universität Innsbruck; Peking University; Université de Lausanne; Universidade de Lisboa; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Tel Aviv University; Simon Fraser University; Sapienza Università di Roma; University of Hong Kong; Universiteit Gent; Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca; Western Sydney University; Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Miami; Durham University; Cardiff University; University of Sussex; University of Leeds; KU Leuven; University of St Andrews; University of Limerick; Flinders University; Trent University; Queen Margaret University; McMaster University; Nottingham Trent University; University of Oxford; University of South Florida; University of Dundee; Johns Hopkins University; Lehigh University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Universitetet i Oslo; University of Exeter; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.025333548971883807,"score_gpt":0.3682861169627905,"score_spread":0.3429525679909067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391176893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010710437,0.005250753,0.00008794056,0.019423883,0.038117245,0.00014559002,0.00011311304,0.000026404947,0.935764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015645238,0.035892073,0.000605806,0.008844987,0.031664513,0.000024101611,0.0002911266,0.000103708946,0.9069284],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747616,0.00033271726,0.0010431972,0.0001843071,0.0005292692,0.00043433273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998284,0.00008369543,0.0010093611,0.000067459696,0.00039606713,0.00015943377],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001392259,0.00019530134,0.00061000884,0.00034875917,0.0005369284,0.00045488877,0.00069290906,0.000969005,0.015336566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013328715,0.00025840878,0.00040149622,0.0003122172,0.0005847667,0.00068931,0.000054101754,0.0012387861,0.02312855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015101403,0.000024919053,0.000004195768,0.000028507347,0.0001713242,0.000065226195,0.0067440416,6.7721317e-7,5.413397e-7,0.0010311207,0.86692804,0.1249863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038063191,0.00003454026,0.0008341145,0.00017027672,0.000045443878,0.00027003858,0.0021967993,6.970292e-8,2.639908e-7,0.002088935,0.9937411,0.000237815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044905688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016827087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12681302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004777709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010247839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392586384","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12737","title":"System circumvention: Dishonest‐illegal transgressions are perceived as justified in non‐meritocratic societies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Meritocracy; Sympathy; Luck; Social psychology; Psychology; System justification; Criminology; Law; Political science; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06572089551318167,"score_gpt":0.3364381870002274,"score_spread":0.2707172914870457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392586384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.970176,0.0010768869,0.000204101,0.013919622,0.0049299467,0.00019194197,0.00004435209,0.000059645616,0.009397533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996448,0.00042101747,0.00004857659,0.0014273335,0.0007790614,0.000015184732,0.0000030214928,0.00002434619,0.0008334854],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779534,0.00034461945,0.0007031025,0.00038719535,0.0004030669,0.00036669837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994,0.000109113644,0.00021928965,0.00008167867,0.00006927883,0.000120604556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042311306,0.0001671521,0.00042738346,0.00019347636,0.00032754347,0.0001322029,0.0003568435,0.00024797433,0.0003060162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007809489,0.0001799391,0.00034935633,0.00037484363,0.00041443834,0.00028968995,0.000023299446,0.00083173654,0.000119573124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011986182,0.0034053547,0.00097111467,0.0014028172,0.00033097574,0.06885033,0.01068146,0.00010178662,0.3482075,0.01276497,0.42255148,0.12953356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0064635184,0.00091984577,0.8609666,0.0068923705,0.00022282502,0.072952434,0.012086039,0.00015316604,0.0005422609,0.013700186,0.024047848,0.0010528561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015176119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017562405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85999554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001115675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007734562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7337704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394013002","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12743","title":"Egoistic value is positively associated with pro‐environmental attitude and behaviour when the environmental problems are psychologically close","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Education University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Psychology; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Association (psychology); Relation (database); Environmental pollution; Geography","score_opus":0.011821083987448364,"score_gpt":0.27675423122760745,"score_spread":0.2649331472401591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394013002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912732,0.0011750264,0.00007821269,0.005820131,0.00022123751,0.00042970094,0.000104940395,0.000023291186,0.00087420817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957229,0.00036644787,0.0001701927,0.0028473402,0.00011222283,0.00002573283,0.000014073177,0.0000360328,0.0007050802],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976549,0.0003643192,0.0005192707,0.000520821,0.00053688214,0.00040381285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992562,0.00008808598,0.00032551843,0.0001467914,0.000005920782,0.00017748552],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007811937,0.00024227132,0.00030968044,0.00003915751,0.00044381304,0.0001528317,0.0003540267,0.00020666189,0.002810522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003902492,0.00019868779,0.00014849311,0.000114887356,0.0016529777,0.00029285435,0.00013532914,0.0007493795,0.000074333584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021097125,0.0032640707,0.9002557,0.00003189548,0.00036103104,0.0012993219,0.0134533765,0.000016933598,0.0039409725,0.00008561691,0.027030775,0.05004938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007559675,0.00044997106,0.98851633,0.000065803826,0.00011231034,0.0019718176,0.001380666,0.000010100401,0.000014433427,0.0019461502,0.0045367223,0.000239751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040625106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034820318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08826065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005086004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019491365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99810106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394692076","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12746","title":"Issue Information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Holloway, University of London; University of Massachusetts Amherst; Universität Innsbruck; Peking University; Université de Lausanne; Universidade de Lisboa; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Tel Aviv University; Simon Fraser University; Sapienza Università di Roma; University of Hong Kong; Universiteit Gent; Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca; Western Sydney University; Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Miami; Durham University; Cardiff University; University of Sussex; University of Leeds; KU Leuven; University of St Andrews; University of Limerick; Flinders University; Trent University; Queen Margaret University; McMaster University; Nottingham Trent University; University of Oxford; University of South Florida; University of Dundee; Johns Hopkins University; Lehigh University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Universitetet i Oslo; University of Exeter; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03412961909160862,"score_gpt":0.2816191236948944,"score_spread":0.24748950460328578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394692076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002124969,0.020422244,0.00014037367,0.0010464032,0.068062365,0.000071059345,0.0019041207,0.0000070879323,0.90813386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021036528,0.010328323,0.00011019162,0.0018045115,0.0040255776,0.0000047020876,0.000070055044,0.000028599961,0.9815244],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982337,0.000015881064,0.0012414326,0.00021172174,0.000042936565,0.00025435872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985071,0.000015225262,0.0012324614,0.000086519634,0.00010098436,0.000057700585],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007164462,0.00014706547,0.00075916806,0.0004079028,0.00013997933,0.00031490112,0.00036117178,0.00036269915,0.072209895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055409615,0.00020794368,0.00035717702,0.00016620386,0.00016758734,0.0004260798,0.0000721051,0.0006029104,0.38893396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010306656,0.000023602193,0.0000040575815,0.00005361818,0.00023223105,0.000024138473,0.000715653,0.000001997869,1.4977373e-7,0.0024933163,0.98874605,0.0076948525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040282027,0.000039967304,0.00026767785,0.00006572386,0.000017990287,0.00023686736,0.00032613132,0.0000012891086,2.4707833e-7,0.00355586,0.9948996,0.00018583509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000061167186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003482775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31672406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010742318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003905215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9286382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394853351","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12751","title":"Honour, acculturation and well‐being: Evidence from the <scp>UK</scp> and Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Acculturation; Immigration; Social psychology; Psychology; Mainstream; Dignity; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.061901054024493675,"score_gpt":0.3647814399028562,"score_spread":0.3028803858783625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394853351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9662841,0.023555957,0.000041804997,0.0055605792,0.0021615305,0.00008012764,0.000017152588,0.000011131727,0.0022876395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99268866,0.0033623034,0.000041226125,0.0014863395,0.001426969,0.0000032838968,0.000004566481,0.0000103770835,0.0009762607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988365,0.00021647688,0.00033466375,0.00022893303,0.00017161694,0.00021180244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990708,0.00053460617,0.00015287024,0.000061549894,0.00009700041,0.00008315714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028552895,0.00011501184,0.00022535307,0.000022454184,0.00026417666,0.0002770638,0.00019024442,0.00013950678,0.00031891654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015266311,0.00008771361,0.00006593666,0.000092248345,0.0001820009,0.00016837256,0.00003289898,0.00045733218,0.000009125311],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027038039,0.000030025642,0.027548628,0.000015737949,0.00030757536,0.00073704636,0.01554889,2.0737647e-7,0.0011186507,0.0016153681,0.86330974,0.08974107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032761032,0.00009528992,0.94373155,0.00019169517,0.000071620074,0.002086173,0.0046125385,0.0000033181866,0.0000066095076,0.003335248,0.045488182,0.00005017792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15520006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16876175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91618294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030168936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006640266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85042554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396871482","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12759","title":"Religious engagement and antibody response to the COVID‐19 vaccine","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"European Research Council","keywords":"Religiosity; Mediation; Moderation; Psychology; Attendance; Social psychology; Church attendance; General Social Survey; Public health; Sociology; Medicine; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.05158213045155298,"score_gpt":0.4378881373467492,"score_spread":0.38630600689519623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396871482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.621414,0.019605063,0.0011368929,0.34634262,0.0040530395,0.00028500916,0.000020244954,0.000057244153,0.00708586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95818335,0.009396942,0.00014769446,0.028713783,0.0027930704,0.00000663358,0.0000019266058,0.000021418466,0.00073517545],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960158,0.002415434,0.0005327265,0.00028473788,0.00036189967,0.00038938838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986412,0.0006056509,0.0001532231,0.00011885437,0.00015835153,0.00032272012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008557816,0.000115220275,0.0002938349,0.00018244628,0.0009552213,0.0002784806,0.00044693856,0.00021697678,0.00022280613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011624047,0.00010867605,0.00015399893,0.0004768099,0.0003453046,0.0001093041,0.0000517354,0.0005912743,0.000059561906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005992432,0.00007694735,0.0009868762,0.0000136471945,0.000095527095,0.0011143135,0.046049733,0.000001153104,0.0003806398,0.0033009963,0.91925204,0.028128896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062376866,0.00025402586,0.051974192,0.00003340133,0.000036095644,0.0018934016,0.0039311554,2.0302197e-7,7.558879e-7,0.009848047,0.931282,0.00012299053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015220852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017578098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3367693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088557426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027804964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73468864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400589831","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12788","title":"Issue Information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Holloway, University of London; University of Massachusetts Amherst; Universität Innsbruck; Peking University; Université de Lausanne; Universidade de Lisboa; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Tel Aviv University; Simon Fraser University; Sapienza Università di Roma; University of Hong Kong; Universiteit Gent; Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca; Western Sydney University; Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Miami; Durham University; Cardiff University; University of Sussex; University of Leeds; KU Leuven; University of St Andrews; University of Limerick; Flinders University; Trent University; Queen Margaret University; McMaster University; Nottingham Trent University; University of Oxford; University of South Florida; University of Dundee; Johns Hopkins University; Lehigh University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Universitetet i Oslo; University of Exeter; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02279502943043251,"score_gpt":0.3397414397859367,"score_spread":0.3169464103555042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400589831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047388943,0.007576588,0.0028356686,0.00085636653,0.1201311,0.00019233723,0.0002159379,0.00011926551,0.8633338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.082617946,0.05950263,0.0010827386,0.0094999205,0.18286778,0.000063032145,0.002064866,0.000626714,0.6616744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988345,0.00006213736,0.0006348831,0.000067253175,0.00024258897,0.0001586195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952155,0.000009471604,0.00018775937,0.000049105176,0.00017862066,0.000053479827],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003146473,0.00013177822,0.0003152394,0.00025488937,0.00006693453,0.00015706135,0.0001670617,0.0004825516,0.11787142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016816022,0.00017493582,0.00018033401,0.00011548567,0.00005165194,0.00030278822,0.000010093996,0.000943141,0.18548957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048880433,0.000007174903,8.387762e-8,0.00011853249,0.00007180419,0.000015909327,0.0006569896,0.00018880496,0.000053871932,0.00000183065,0.912074,0.08680606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030314908,0.000036882513,0.0005918902,0.00015850348,0.00004226655,0.000590106,0.000113470196,0.000033213233,0.0000020350205,0.00013416889,0.99784535,0.00014897154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.372318e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004463293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20165947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120086464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045049004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.882935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403693256","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12806","title":"Policy as normative influence? On the relationship between parental leave policy and social norms in gender division of childcare across 48 countries","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; York University; University of Waterloo; University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation; Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Economic and Social Research Council; Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Jilin Office of Philosophy and Social Science; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Masarykova Univerzita; Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo; National Research University Higher School of Economics; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Canada Research Chairs; Centro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión Social; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Normative; Operationalization; Psychology; Norm (philosophy); Parental leave; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Social policy; Descriptive statistics; Work (physics); Political science","score_opus":0.055448093314446674,"score_gpt":0.41884434558040357,"score_spread":0.3633962522659569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403693256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97536534,0.001059739,0.0000053680283,0.015127774,0.00025849527,0.00015711013,0.00012947155,0.000017736,0.007878971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99641633,0.00097513833,0.0000067676137,0.0007302848,0.0017796432,0.000004633538,0.000004580555,0.000016537879,0.00006607685],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977802,0.0005388961,0.0005522319,0.00018572867,0.00052934326,0.00041359276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858624,0.0007693946,0.00033693653,0.000056789777,0.00018203811,0.00006862423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014690359,0.00013274043,0.0003512634,0.00021686843,0.00083509076,0.00017624386,0.00034200578,0.00031315276,0.000031507916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000969217,0.00012509832,0.0001334835,0.000608965,0.001429196,0.00039916873,0.000065649874,0.00082146167,0.000017525199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005879315,0.00006587732,0.6593883,0.000039956652,0.000080508915,0.000050067127,0.2690985,0.000001898946,0.000007921592,0.056763723,0.0022060866,0.012238403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042635336,0.000068323854,0.91747415,0.00016231835,0.000009787969,0.000047003636,0.03074076,6.4160794e-8,0.0000016497104,0.049360696,0.001603292,0.00010561879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019343123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014609108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25808585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026305125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041561734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64229274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404720691","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12819","title":"Cues of trait dominance elicit inferences of psychological ownership","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Trait; Psychology; Dominance (genetics); Social psychology; Social dominance orientation; Feeling; Psychological research; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.07897564660031435,"score_gpt":0.418189315132173,"score_spread":0.33921366853185864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404720691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9510994,0.01085883,0.00037947216,0.0011911505,0.0042079347,0.00015075116,0.00011502739,0.0000388,0.031958666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996489,0.00046028325,0.00046432932,0.00034203424,0.0008801068,0.000012796934,0.0000075684115,0.000030483327,0.0013133842],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967722,0.00055211515,0.0014845543,0.00043210248,0.00032398128,0.00043503052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983328,0.00026294327,0.00076678675,0.00020984378,0.00032444115,0.00010320872],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011577016,0.00022251821,0.0008352833,0.00037902102,0.00011790107,0.00002577007,0.0006938771,0.00065264234,0.0063117384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008317253,0.00022838094,0.00053903065,0.00046015426,0.0014688707,0.00019600218,0.00003111599,0.001024905,0.00006916441],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028159558,0.005895244,0.029939523,0.00024969093,0.0011668922,0.0037941283,0.013673484,0.0000023380512,0.010776039,0.1819779,0.32922703,0.42048177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018727287,0.0015713129,0.95423305,0.0002975417,0.00016619546,0.0059151766,0.0008749643,3.5219563e-7,0.000043413922,0.020857241,0.013918135,0.00024990132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040630803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003591275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9242935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027076072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059449725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406805786","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12854","title":"Overcoming low status or maintaining high status? A multinational examination of the association between socioeconomic status and honour","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"H2020 European Research Council","keywords":"Honour; Socioeconomic status; Social psychology; Multinational corporation; Promotion (chess); Psychology; Association (psychology); Sociology; Gender studies; Developmental psychology; Demography; Political science; Law; Population","score_opus":0.036449166058298184,"score_gpt":0.3632780786514287,"score_spread":0.3268289125931305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406805786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955485,0.00045503167,0.00011589207,0.00079903303,0.0012143345,0.00015657391,0.0001552862,0.000009252711,0.0015461002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977068,0.00038265495,0.00016092489,0.00037194838,0.0003808627,0.0000055891383,0.000018449353,0.000012358089,0.0009604299],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785125,0.0005632925,0.0007223914,0.00021018203,0.000211438,0.0004414667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979471,0.0005069015,0.001098332,0.000071418115,0.00030428998,0.00007196991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008121068,0.0001310117,0.0004274029,0.00013741269,0.00027672635,0.00007445031,0.00017384293,0.00027293744,0.000530646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003349393,0.000119009674,0.00014746662,0.00016864865,0.0001612957,0.00017480481,0.000059408438,0.00048560978,0.0000041878775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022255896,0.0001837484,0.78732264,0.00003170982,0.00065079745,0.000011323601,0.0069028228,0.0000036523465,0.00033263655,0.005985665,0.0048880694,0.19346437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032489651,0.00011543473,0.9875063,0.00009031398,0.0001000177,0.000024596284,0.0036781426,0.0000042067513,0.0000149294165,0.0037952638,0.0013112362,0.00011061237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004736043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021659263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20018363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035613618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013506137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5810202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406913832","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12863","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Holloway, University of London; University of Massachusetts Amherst; Universität Innsbruck; Peking University; Université de Lausanne; Universidade de Lisboa; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Tel Aviv University; Simon Fraser University; Sapienza Università di Roma; University of Hong Kong; Universiteit Gent; Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca; Western Sydney University; Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Miami; Durham University; Cardiff University; University of Sussex; University of Leeds; KU Leuven; University of St Andrews; University of Limerick; Flinders University; Trent University; Queen Margaret University; McMaster University; Nottingham Trent University; University of Oxford; University of South Florida; University of Dundee; Johns Hopkins University; Lehigh University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Universitetet i Oslo; University of Exeter; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01932926962333846,"score_gpt":0.336730928336579,"score_spread":0.31740165871324055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406913832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016948478,0.0021728778,0.0057808007,0.0005252038,0.055732355,0.00015598988,0.00013410255,0.000053007752,0.9337508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028239194,0.042484444,0.0012545091,0.011997712,0.06956947,0.00004828491,0.0017971018,0.0002135543,0.84439576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988416,0.00008377587,0.00065138657,0.000060278213,0.00020877864,0.0001541851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936515,0.000014222889,0.00025992712,0.000055617125,0.0002615448,0.000043566048],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029274952,0.0001242621,0.00034526078,0.00026740984,0.000094281415,0.000091864924,0.00019689651,0.0004990458,0.114515774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003153393,0.00017481299,0.00015971952,0.000121298595,0.000048299655,0.00028581405,0.000010030945,0.00074790075,0.04565296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072682938,0.000009891365,2.7703447e-7,0.00008061985,0.000058630383,0.000004911659,0.0003221107,0.00026093866,0.000027044305,0.0000013392645,0.8825645,0.11666249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053226406,0.000028502194,0.0018607987,0.00014039197,0.00003147468,0.00016987452,0.000093478404,0.000022523063,0.0000021626147,0.000054563658,0.9969318,0.00013220441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.788932e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004027916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116530284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011685957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066400666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9550901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406928270","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12813","title":"Issue Information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Holloway, University of London; University of Massachusetts Amherst; Universität Innsbruck; Peking University; Université de Lausanne; Universidade de Lisboa; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Tel Aviv University; Simon Fraser University; Sapienza Università di Roma; University of Hong Kong; Universiteit Gent; Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca; Western Sydney University; Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Miami; Durham University; Cardiff University; University of Sussex; University of Leeds; KU Leuven; University of St Andrews; University of Limerick; Flinders University; Trent University; Queen Margaret University; McMaster University; Nottingham Trent University; University of Oxford; University of South Florida; University of Dundee; Johns Hopkins University; Lehigh University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Universitetet i Oslo; University of Exeter; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02279502943043251,"score_gpt":0.3397414397859367,"score_spread":0.3169464103555042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406928270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047388943,0.007576588,0.0028356686,0.00085636653,0.1201311,0.00019233723,0.0002159379,0.00011926551,0.8633338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.082617946,0.05950263,0.0010827386,0.0094999205,0.18286778,0.000063032145,0.002064866,0.000626714,0.6616744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988345,0.00006213736,0.0006348831,0.000067253175,0.00024258897,0.0001586195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952155,0.000009471604,0.00018775937,0.000049105176,0.00017862066,0.000053479827],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003146473,0.00013177822,0.0003152394,0.00025488937,0.00006693453,0.00015706135,0.0001670617,0.0004825516,0.11787142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016816022,0.00017493582,0.00018033401,0.00011548567,0.00005165194,0.00030278822,0.000010093996,0.000943141,0.18548957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048880433,0.000007174903,8.387762e-8,0.00011853249,0.00007180419,0.000015909327,0.0006569896,0.00018880496,0.000053871932,0.00000183065,0.912074,0.08680606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030314908,0.000036882513,0.0005918902,0.00015850348,0.00004226655,0.000590106,0.000113470196,0.000033213233,0.0000020350205,0.00013416889,0.99784535,0.00014897154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.372318e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004463293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20165947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120086464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045049004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.882935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408161838","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12871","title":"Examining the connection between position‐based power and social status across 70 cultures","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"National Research University Higher School of Economics; Narodowe Centrum Nauki; Hungarian Scientific Research Fund; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; European Commission","keywords":"Social psychology; Connection (principal bundle); Psychology; Position (finance); Power (physics); Social status; Social position; Social power; Social relation; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08204655135146,"score_gpt":0.4353853574486395,"score_spread":0.3533388060971795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408161838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98479813,0.001169296,0.00029024802,0.006343447,0.0014021739,0.00010852558,0.00007765232,0.000019970965,0.0057905507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956159,0.00005332284,0.000034049564,0.0030456565,0.0007678471,0.000005734656,0.000015145768,0.00001015123,0.00045217064],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984399,0.0003991989,0.00043963527,0.00020731735,0.00015096653,0.00036299537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992101,0.00014904344,0.00032642,0.00005978058,0.00020690693,0.000047705507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045055305,0.00012869798,0.0003326435,0.00005390723,0.0008481998,0.00016694561,0.00019469863,0.00027073314,0.00038807126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047134425,0.00010894367,0.00014554252,0.00018561332,0.00039115144,0.000098280034,0.000033593395,0.00054448104,0.000007291271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096701266,0.0005383021,0.14768437,0.000047082114,0.0014889509,0.00028463182,0.048197147,0.0000012472761,0.0024936819,0.012180316,0.43989033,0.34622696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018051196,0.0002122498,0.96903265,0.00003662586,0.00007285752,0.00023654074,0.010887426,2.9974302e-7,0.000010497083,0.0022306798,0.015360889,0.00011415526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001458059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007229551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8213483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038432037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028403241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6523753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408528613","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12849","title":"A wolf in sheep's clothing? The interplay of perceived threat and social norms in hierarchy‐maintaining action tendencies towards disadvantaged groups","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation; Tel Aviv University; Minerva Foundation","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Social psychology; Hierarchy; Psychology; Autonomy; Action (physics); Power (physics); Perception; Political science","score_opus":0.02549626382841616,"score_gpt":0.3944687537633482,"score_spread":0.36897248993493204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408528613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728215,0.00049188954,0.00017566547,0.012575747,0.001640896,0.0001894763,0.0000056283047,0.000013104427,0.012086118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966171,0.001040675,0.000058766254,0.0014894136,0.0005664012,0.000010815214,0.0000015784934,0.0000121610365,0.00020310009],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717575,0.0010240665,0.00080833293,0.0002469445,0.00029897373,0.00044590147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990521,0.0002587836,0.00041174135,0.00006260852,0.00016821413,0.000046551144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022929204,0.00014511397,0.0005631351,0.0003294543,0.00056193874,0.000079797304,0.00048526496,0.0003820957,0.000102925595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004160201,0.00014040075,0.00019722657,0.00058609823,0.001593423,0.00035068346,0.00007767529,0.0010543461,0.0000011193349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001404555,0.00074000756,0.10185395,0.0000531328,0.00022954751,0.00029095332,0.41108865,0.0000019663366,0.0035157753,0.029139316,0.0053503835,0.44633177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016674646,0.00014386905,0.86069953,0.00013715457,0.00002029619,0.00009066431,0.10657167,0.000002002487,0.000004427139,0.027871009,0.0026669258,0.00012496352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003356975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01794427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7588456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025005126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001708051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409958707","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12891","title":"‘Nothing to lose or a world to win’: Reconsidering efficacy, legitimacy, political trust and repression in confrontational collective action","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health","keywords":"Legitimacy; Collective action; Social psychology; Politics; Collective responsibility; Psychology; Nothing; System justification; Political science; Law; Ideology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09404237997619981,"score_gpt":0.4582367235062856,"score_spread":0.3641943435300858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409958707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8856814,0.00011053244,0.00064987916,0.041844573,0.0020552059,0.00039481636,0.000008232903,0.00002300074,0.06923235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836118,0.000043147404,0.00085255987,0.01109695,0.000878463,0.000017485012,6.969358e-7,0.00001166136,0.0034872412],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980356,0.00047581474,0.0005551246,0.00029133743,0.00020954636,0.00043254718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989346,0.00041611976,0.00016160305,0.000044288503,0.00023367467,0.00020969396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008729164,0.00010448485,0.00037803352,0.0004735195,0.0004894754,0.000120087934,0.00019249562,0.00019828953,0.0003413168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014099856,0.00012521251,0.00008673988,0.0007736613,0.00029582158,0.00022031312,0.00005020493,0.0004680843,0.000007647973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00781653,0.0012861615,0.02155792,0.000038837443,0.00030537794,0.0012000848,0.1514738,0.000014312552,0.0044003013,0.057122063,0.25374687,0.5010378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035588653,0.00036357882,0.8617923,0.0004891685,0.0000324302,0.00036265177,0.024769358,0.0000022352351,0.00004871951,0.024692982,0.083613284,0.00027437185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010846492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011394357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84023446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041396133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038353383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6358319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409958718","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12765","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Holloway, University of London; University of Massachusetts Amherst; Universität Innsbruck; Peking University; Université de Lausanne; Universidade de Lisboa; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Tel Aviv University; Simon Fraser University; Sapienza Università di Roma; University of Hong Kong; Universiteit Gent; Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca; Western Sydney University; Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Miami; Durham University; Cardiff University; University of Sussex; University of Leeds; KU Leuven; University of St Andrews; University of Limerick; Flinders University; Trent University; Queen Margaret University; McMaster University; Nottingham Trent University; University of Oxford; University of South Florida; University of Dundee; Johns Hopkins University; Lehigh University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Universitetet i Oslo; University of Exeter; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.029351528500323888,"score_gpt":0.27909383875391763,"score_spread":0.24974231025359375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409958718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010939549,0.008634094,0.00037996503,0.0009033223,0.045559462,0.000080054844,0.0016649498,0.0000044934623,0.94266427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008387683,0.0083302595,0.00014116982,0.0025137055,0.0017786617,0.0000040694217,0.00006828273,0.000011414643,0.98631364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823135,0.0000211024,0.0012720114,0.00019074255,0.000037210157,0.00024755998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980089,0.000022417013,0.0016786866,0.00009739131,0.0001451782,0.000047412712],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066871167,0.00013906247,0.0008276052,0.00042700462,0.0001939761,0.00018889079,0.00042232257,0.00037444217,0.0704228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010092481,0.00020779576,0.0003180776,0.00017430467,0.00015726502,0.00040299832,0.00007171737,0.00048348305,0.12564854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015501188,0.000033032728,0.0000130227845,0.00003827786,0.00019737186,0.000008120667,0.00037359179,0.0000028075024,7.9777216e-8,0.0018975941,0.9865688,0.010851789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006887578,0.000031278487,0.0007931744,0.000058560992,0.000013595617,0.0000725447,0.0002720569,8.9284663e-7,2.6129104e-7,0.0015052455,0.99639773,0.00016590541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007982606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003136896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05522575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010470855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056464585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93042696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410377857","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12900","title":"Primary and secondary generalization effects from Black and gay contact: Longitudinal evidence of between‐ and within‐person effects","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Outgroup; Prejudice (legal term); Ingroups and outgroups; Social psychology; Contact hypothesis; Contact theory; Generalization; Social contact; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.031928768530556415,"score_gpt":0.3598059743540418,"score_spread":0.3278772058234854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410377857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9833882,0.010397783,0.0004858226,0.0021091995,0.0010498303,0.00019746152,0.000008995086,0.000010735245,0.0023519814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946723,0.0031518321,0.00022583484,0.0011613445,0.00068654685,0.000002883555,0.0000025868478,0.000009566208,0.000087129694],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982118,0.00067907415,0.00042070038,0.0002684043,0.0001940897,0.00022593683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998485,0.0007476962,0.00042608785,0.000052333642,0.00017786579,0.0001109954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080567965,0.00012603962,0.00056367536,0.00011639336,0.00033087342,0.00007764548,0.00015771395,0.0003325428,0.000025115558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036683242,0.00014826586,0.000076661534,0.00019770597,0.001176987,0.0003249656,0.000041853098,0.00037502812,6.972137e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071716716,0.00022676632,0.5673299,0.00065234484,0.0007552486,0.00029338797,0.0326396,1.4981336e-7,0.020987276,0.0089857625,0.018960081,0.34845233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016116516,0.00038967986,0.9878368,0.0006293997,0.00013447188,0.000044125183,0.00077944447,5.9717155e-7,0.00010551611,0.007873802,0.000473434,0.00012107653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011507939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004587745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42050692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051924242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107512744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60461056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410750696","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12901","title":"Majority friendship and support for social change: Examining the role of ethnic and politicized identifications among Indigenous people in Chile","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University Belfast; Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo; Centro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión Social; Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias; Queen's University; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Friendship; Ethnic group; Indigenous; Psychology; Social psychology; Social support; Social change; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04547192693825104,"score_gpt":0.392410611685461,"score_spread":0.34693868474720996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410750696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841894,0.0014567958,0.000028448036,0.0008764653,0.000553759,0.00049920374,0.000030892206,0.0000056820245,0.012359387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959011,0.002881585,0.00004597949,0.00012268362,0.0007272715,0.000012798218,0.0000055955293,0.0000070181136,0.00029597967],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848115,0.00041261778,0.00046273903,0.00014198945,0.0001490514,0.00035242285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905646,0.00022433908,0.00036916608,0.00004767626,0.0002407062,0.00006165712],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021259026,0.00006751897,0.00027741608,0.00015870469,0.0031060132,0.000051154013,0.00019574528,0.00021252793,0.000026602791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004503193,0.000069740556,0.000056947978,0.0003516356,0.00058551057,0.00016376421,0.0000036522206,0.00027562986,3.059548e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039826096,0.00023134254,0.03527831,0.000045087665,0.00004135488,0.0000032196858,0.85634047,2.1503933e-8,0.000014510259,0.084564015,0.0001052278,0.0233366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005900143,0.0000543001,0.93105984,0.000026882824,0.000034120665,0.000024970763,0.034098253,2.8872006e-7,0.0000050961035,0.025161019,0.008883077,0.00006212104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034999147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.489661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8957816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007122951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015753196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99819183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412838864","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12766","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Holloway, University of London; University of Massachusetts Amherst; Universität Innsbruck; Peking University; Université de Lausanne; Universidade de Lisboa; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Tel Aviv University; Simon Fraser University; Sapienza Università di Roma; University of Hong Kong; Universiteit Gent; Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca; Western Sydney University; Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Miami; Durham University; Cardiff University; University of Sussex; University of Leeds; KU Leuven; University of St Andrews; University of Limerick; Flinders University; Trent University; Queen Margaret University; McMaster University; Nottingham Trent University; University of Oxford; University of South Florida; University of Dundee; Johns Hopkins University; Lehigh University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Universitetet i Oslo; University of Exeter; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.029351528500323888,"score_gpt":0.27909383875391763,"score_spread":0.24974231025359375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412838864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010939549,0.008634094,0.00037996503,0.0009033223,0.045559462,0.000080054844,0.0016649498,0.0000044934623,0.94266427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008387683,0.0083302595,0.00014116982,0.0025137055,0.0017786617,0.0000040694217,0.00006828273,0.000011414643,0.98631364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823135,0.0000211024,0.0012720114,0.00019074255,0.000037210157,0.00024755998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980089,0.000022417013,0.0016786866,0.00009739131,0.0001451782,0.000047412712],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066871167,0.00013906247,0.0008276052,0.00042700462,0.0001939761,0.00018889079,0.00042232257,0.00037444217,0.0704228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010092481,0.00020779576,0.0003180776,0.00017430467,0.00015726502,0.00040299832,0.00007171737,0.00048348305,0.12564854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015501188,0.000033032728,0.0000130227845,0.00003827786,0.00019737186,0.000008120667,0.00037359179,0.0000028075024,7.9777216e-8,0.0018975941,0.9865688,0.010851789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006887578,0.000031278487,0.0007931744,0.000058560992,0.000013595617,0.0000725447,0.0002720569,8.9284663e-7,2.6129104e-7,0.0015052455,0.99639773,0.00016590541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007982606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003136896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05522575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010470855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056464585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93042696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416095877","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70018","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Holloway, University of London; University of Massachusetts Amherst; Universität Innsbruck; Peking University; Université de Lausanne; Universidade de Lisboa; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Tel Aviv University; Simon Fraser University; Sapienza Università di Roma; University of Hong Kong; Universiteit Gent; Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca; Western Sydney University; Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Miami; Durham University; Cardiff University; University of Sussex; University of Leeds; KU Leuven; University of St Andrews; University of Limerick; Flinders University; Trent University; Queen Margaret University; McMaster University; Nottingham Trent University; University of Oxford; University of South Florida; University of Dundee; Johns Hopkins University; Lehigh University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Universitetet i Oslo; University of Exeter; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"","score_opus":0.01932926962333846,"score_gpt":0.336730928336579,"score_spread":0.31740165871324055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416095877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016948478,0.0021728778,0.0057808007,0.0005252038,0.055732355,0.00015598988,0.00013410255,0.000053007752,0.9337508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028239194,0.042484444,0.0012545091,0.011997712,0.06956947,0.00004828491,0.0017971018,0.0002135543,0.84439576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988416,0.00008377587,0.00065138657,0.000060278213,0.00020877864,0.0001541851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936515,0.000014222889,0.00025992712,0.000055617125,0.0002615448,0.000043566048],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029274952,0.0001242621,0.00034526078,0.00026740984,0.000094281415,0.000091864924,0.00019689651,0.0004990458,0.114515774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003153393,0.00017481299,0.00015971952,0.000121298595,0.000048299655,0.00028581405,0.000010030945,0.00074790075,0.04565296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072682938,0.000009891365,2.7703447e-7,0.00008061985,0.000058630383,0.000004911659,0.0003221107,0.00026093866,0.000027044305,0.0000013392645,0.8825645,0.11666249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053226406,0.000028502194,0.0018607987,0.00014039197,0.00003147468,0.00016987452,0.000093478404,0.000022523063,0.0000021626147,0.000054563658,0.9969318,0.00013220441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.788932e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004027916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116530284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011685957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066400666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9550901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}