{"meta":{"query_hash":"ac177466d818","filters":{"venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law"},"cohort_total":25,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":25,"exported":25,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ac177466d818","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Brooklyn+journal+of+international+law"},"results":[{"id":"W1515416359","doi":"","title":"Securities Litigation and Enforcement: The Canadian Perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Legislature; Business; Perspective (graphical); Broker-dealer; Accounting; Law and economics; Finance; Investment banking; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02134926259446945,"score_gpt":0.23222053284610805,"score_spread":0.2108712702516386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515416359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033419665,0.07955813,0.0020655117,0.2766538,0.00089994457,0.0000614928,0.0011142425,0.00006839343,0.6061589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79262424,0.12813891,0.002380132,0.02889653,0.0012055855,0.000046725767,0.0004708387,0.00006553461,0.046171483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99119765,0.0007618318,0.0002521347,0.0007523088,0.0038610743,0.0031748961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892511,0.0024756794,0.0010522023,0.00026398318,0.0055257976,0.0014313649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034517008,0.0005972454,0.00086905644,0.009362544,0.016767658,0.016483342,0.0028869938,0.0060061,0.013543827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011947435,0.0005000424,0.00097571855,0.014808535,0.019213967,0.0047465237,0.003046563,0.0053052176,0.00047494547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026820946,0.000028199263,0.0050985436,0.00023163331,0.000023976037,0.00031718335,0.0030634298,0.0014540559,0.000094414776,0.9296477,0.035054196,0.024959981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071004884,0.00006599249,0.055012286,0.0024013314,0.00020988435,0.00056500867,0.02315982,0.003318988,0.00040590676,0.15030539,0.7642032,0.00028118002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99574274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24849613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24849613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33084306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87163794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117854848","doi":"","title":"Punishing the Parent: Corporate Criminal Complicity in Human Rights Abuses","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Universal jurisdiction; Jurisdiction; Corporate liability; Law; Culpability; Subsidiary; Liability; Political science; Criminal law; Business; Context (archaeology); War crime; Parent company; Corporation; International law; Multinational corporation","score_opus":0.07493898021072984,"score_gpt":0.25390996668414484,"score_spread":0.178970986473415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117854848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65526366,0.003233369,0.0219707,0.030966012,0.00026135982,0.00013257746,0.000024439078,0.000090189606,0.28805774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99282974,0.0003850165,0.0008487648,0.0022217934,0.00004342251,0.000018238505,0.0000036227395,0.000006645583,0.003642735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943105,0.0034770218,0.00021350101,0.00036807996,0.0008671458,0.00076378067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913139,0.0042746,0.0024121797,0.00059418014,0.0009266335,0.0004785595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044652647,0.0002442356,0.00024063919,0.00070251146,0.003991349,0.0031031598,0.0007249902,0.003751179,0.001996728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017651672,0.00019994023,0.00023673162,0.00053246546,0.0070191664,0.0028544378,0.004220491,0.0031005605,0.00019331489],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006293473,0.00021350117,0.063850895,0.00012946637,0.000043523287,0.022970106,0.07684442,0.0015000403,0.0017733908,0.69164205,0.015644109,0.1253256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013266272,0.0007386149,0.11909417,0.0025703132,0.00026125618,0.057710554,0.11178633,0.017737225,0.011121054,0.2767988,0.40180844,0.0002405031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009568036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012809564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009568036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019800165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004133224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023614883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217343614","doi":"","title":"A Human Rights-Based Approach to the Global Regulation of Humanitarian Relief: The Emerging Obligation to Incorporate Local Participation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Human rights; Political science; Law and economics; International humanitarian law; Business; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05303867542970748,"score_gpt":0.3358723347171132,"score_spread":0.2828336592874057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217343614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005366165,0.016093059,0.053831365,0.34766784,0.004336754,0.00027194052,0.00017871887,0.00013359931,0.5721206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53301954,0.018096909,0.03751375,0.24921355,0.008288313,0.0011626799,0.00039374852,0.00029514456,0.15201634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.974157,0.0126595665,0.0010390035,0.003667211,0.0055591976,0.0029179978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98867714,0.006473229,0.00086736353,0.001446285,0.0015755807,0.0009604365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024838628,0.0011807099,0.00085659337,0.001651188,0.006977517,0.015606444,0.0048507513,0.02225576,0.008452066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014502768,0.00061945745,0.0012246334,0.002297971,0.07255406,0.01525554,0.012855316,0.023298739,0.0014215499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024191181,0.0000065101026,0.000032346863,0.000021375077,0.0000014289863,0.000031733893,0.0008898705,0.00013010722,0.000032383035,0.9911101,0.005582687,0.0021590646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015875623,0.000038595004,0.0003533113,0.00061510026,0.0000066173006,0.00013339649,0.0019291312,0.0006154635,0.00014138459,0.66686076,0.32924858,0.00004183332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01934766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019395975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024838628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01169025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02361688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13136077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262497743","doi":"","title":"Reputational Fallacies in International Law: A Comparative Review of United States and Canadian Trade Actions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; State (computer science); Political science; International law; Compliance (psychology); Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.08039602248073814,"score_gpt":0.403834335563757,"score_spread":0.32343831308301885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262497743","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083764753,0.99674773,0.000020358979,0.00080478407,0.00004737014,0.0000087024755,0.000059588372,0.0000015629931,0.0014723201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014291923,0.9851741,0.00006521221,0.00020060455,0.000032673608,0.000007116431,0.00005004574,0.0000010326877,0.00017719083],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575907,0.00084332767,0.00041547607,0.00019574669,0.0025601732,0.00022618272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97970355,0.008803476,0.0024561132,0.00030725315,0.008328428,0.0004012302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009076927,0.00044680428,0.0013992892,0.014204835,0.001426726,0.003560754,0.001096785,0.0010961619,0.0021136396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023709059,0.00037049342,0.00059184426,0.038792226,0.0021596383,0.001709827,0.0009719974,0.00085494615,0.00018680857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001749456,0.000043338096,0.0064222165,0.06758976,0.0008546891,0.00021664481,0.0034059833,0.00057809893,0.0002213296,0.012227209,0.07303099,0.8352348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007490542,0.00017209255,0.110481694,0.10407725,0.00372166,0.00076038623,0.0056275832,0.00020005337,0.00031900159,0.003860606,0.7706019,0.00010284665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47397372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7395171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52602625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0170165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052530184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9424298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263093417","doi":"","title":"A Tale of Three Takings: Taking Analysis in Land Use Regulation in the United States, Australia and Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Supreme court; Just compensation; Private property; Property law; Eminent domain; Public use; Property rights; Possession (linguistics); Common law; Political science; Law; Public property; Government (linguistics); Nonpossessory interest in land; Law and economics; Land law; Land tenure; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.0354172027079544,"score_gpt":0.2889424336074119,"score_spread":0.2535252308994575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263093417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21487612,0.013062762,0.006562021,0.06417595,0.00024754985,0.00022148278,0.00022981419,0.000044577526,0.70057976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9457539,0.008687775,0.0039654635,0.009407693,0.000059701266,0.00008971174,0.00008910286,0.000041079842,0.03190557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518174,0.0006124611,0.000104200284,0.00035400753,0.0024018404,0.00134567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969008,0.00075269636,0.00018755526,0.000100787285,0.0015426757,0.0005155985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020870394,0.00038829554,0.0004457981,0.004145828,0.019787656,0.00924333,0.0019789925,0.0026377386,0.0024526708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041605425,0.00032544794,0.0007761817,0.0055100084,0.025038892,0.0035843228,0.0031470696,0.0067311972,0.00009233568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000885046,0.00002393166,0.0038911363,0.00004200097,0.000010884892,0.00022184002,0.01817666,0.0007691896,0.000166793,0.95951414,0.005328506,0.011846224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003123892,0.00007571894,0.084035784,0.0013666564,0.0001820447,0.00031694377,0.13363652,0.0067715077,0.0015784246,0.3800338,0.3916349,0.00033653685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.983055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10501878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10501878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12941997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76196814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278966334","doi":"","title":"Modernization of Commercial Law: International Uniformity and Economic Development","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Commercial law; Jurisdiction; Legal profession; Institution; Legal research; Modernization theory; Political science; Comparative law; Legal history; Corporate law; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.020139776523495176,"score_gpt":0.2933650379325496,"score_spread":0.2732252614090544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278966334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12761208,0.021685148,0.0060964907,0.029008163,0.0001523112,0.000045034358,0.000098850825,0.000065050095,0.81523687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872277,0.0039253305,0.0010311997,0.0007893539,0.00017366365,0.000024150679,0.00003782577,0.000017569073,0.0067731384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977392,0.0007131339,0.00010427973,0.00042506604,0.00056162314,0.0004566072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957802,0.0013339269,0.0007998827,0.0008011897,0.00091051223,0.00037435777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003400844,0.00015273367,0.00030843745,0.0019263661,0.0029364286,0.0076459316,0.0007308185,0.0011445731,0.0049130786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068675624,0.00016810928,0.00022130243,0.0028286036,0.021458797,0.0064692423,0.003910785,0.0030599965,0.00022573142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041260228,0.000010920165,0.0015253299,0.000014221054,0.0000033912497,0.000030333591,0.0010592891,0.00013934262,0.000042626012,0.98406905,0.00082050177,0.012280841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022643604,0.00004853285,0.028674118,0.00031014965,0.0000143645875,0.00027679213,0.00302807,0.001144194,0.0003684139,0.7686696,0.1974187,0.000024305647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007767442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064739767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007767442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073285378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036105267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05317253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291128159","doi":"","title":"The Hague Principles and the Choice of Non-State \"Rules of Law\" to Govern an International Commercial Contract","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Arbitration; Law; Statute; Conflict of laws; State (computer science); Terminology; Political science; International law; International arbitration; Autonomy; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.01890843267775967,"score_gpt":0.26201842626993466,"score_spread":0.243109993592175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291128159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012859554,0.007630104,0.1049693,0.067247726,0.0036091658,0.00038152994,0.00018446715,0.00021250066,0.8029056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6024734,0.004991122,0.085743666,0.06260694,0.0019331616,0.0025219542,0.00028149446,0.0005519968,0.23889624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96213204,0.013997281,0.0038561376,0.004633747,0.011552147,0.003828615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98169404,0.011644497,0.0009471519,0.0021210471,0.0029270689,0.00066619524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036267415,0.00093258667,0.0013308775,0.0033232302,0.012011344,0.023240356,0.0046273917,0.02116706,0.004669777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044743225,0.0018690875,0.0021586015,0.0024755027,0.041777946,0.014733528,0.008689498,0.027254902,0.0019099059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020699838,0.000003418064,0.000032569656,0.0000066574116,0.000002017391,0.000015626245,0.00048818675,0.00008892359,0.000014974736,0.9965642,0.0017662414,0.0010150532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026699006,0.000016555796,0.00017457138,0.00027051094,0.000015875916,0.00006869429,0.00062563893,0.00051204,0.00020265744,0.86355937,0.13446908,0.00005834514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036575433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03711385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036575433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011615927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02770138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19180274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342078010","doi":"","title":"The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Toward a Definition of \"Foreign Official\"","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Law; Political science; Business; Enforcement","score_opus":0.0606271019766473,"score_gpt":0.2683681754329646,"score_spread":0.2077410734563173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342078010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0083095515,0.023210105,0.015692256,0.17422524,0.0040270216,0.00017124653,0.00027017045,0.0001455023,0.77394885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6168531,0.017941918,0.033966836,0.20393763,0.004636165,0.0016905884,0.0006502538,0.00034848892,0.119975016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826902,0.008826655,0.0010514124,0.0013326523,0.004174256,0.0019248265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902919,0.003406632,0.001590411,0.0013324497,0.002523003,0.00085560133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009147948,0.001272058,0.0007053447,0.0028065105,0.009971771,0.013628705,0.0024550837,0.021259077,0.0034275462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012337076,0.00050534745,0.0007763126,0.0029213435,0.034520503,0.014063707,0.0060171355,0.015744379,0.0013866343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028266086,0.000010883168,0.0002167846,0.000027392236,7.9622384e-7,0.00004257192,0.0036125272,0.000049861024,0.000021420758,0.97528994,0.017915262,0.0028096393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010470897,0.00003845438,0.002342799,0.0022238353,0.000007964821,0.00037845364,0.010612249,0.00064627314,0.00017117987,0.2199389,0.76357764,0.0000518241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022231879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02135118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022231879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075727603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020394135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054944456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2488304506","doi":"","title":"Bilingual Interpretation of Enactments in Canada: Principles v. Practice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Political science; Linguistics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012269091142209096,"score_gpt":0.30492908268188895,"score_spread":0.29265999153967986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2488304506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12108563,0.0033455803,0.041506227,0.12043907,0.0005842185,0.0003606629,0.00051466684,0.0004085537,0.71175545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92092466,0.001018072,0.014775319,0.009331117,0.00011701281,0.00012855965,0.00011680876,0.00020391289,0.05338446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9692134,0.008420366,0.0013269633,0.0026332748,0.011790134,0.0066158706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97620755,0.009088617,0.0009958602,0.001965155,0.01016842,0.0015744239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019024657,0.000674053,0.00086781976,0.0023482095,0.020416943,0.014795782,0.0033779368,0.008869314,0.006969892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05151371,0.0009152496,0.0008003245,0.0044131083,0.02173551,0.006356654,0.00620947,0.012027556,0.0007007799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005751124,0.000034012595,0.0025755926,0.00009299382,0.00001984289,0.00040951907,0.039709777,0.0007374733,0.00036307375,0.9076205,0.02258348,0.025796175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017600792,0.00009708305,0.014047847,0.0011805715,0.00022483413,0.0008975577,0.061161954,0.007577667,0.0045374343,0.40743774,0.50234264,0.00031860342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9621709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9764109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9162312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08376876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32199478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6077877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510899649","doi":"","title":"Commentary: Globalism and National Media Policies in the United States and Canada: A Critique of C. Edwin Baker's Media, Markets and Democracy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalism; Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Media studies; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.013876827113013303,"score_gpt":0.2827106186478392,"score_spread":0.2688337915348259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510899649","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021286863,0.0016756121,0.00005641307,0.9733234,0.023209143,0.000007714316,0.00010554789,0.000013654608,0.0013956119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0042953677,0.0016183608,0.00012973051,0.9621421,0.026826035,0.00004339361,0.000038141865,0.000034113087,0.0048728506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99411243,0.0014623245,0.00043580364,0.000862741,0.0023093729,0.0008174156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94698316,0.037014905,0.001395332,0.0005206256,0.011182326,0.0029036338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058806255,0.0013456304,0.0018849191,0.0024990875,0.012356334,0.0061910152,0.0078560375,0.073712155,0.0072998125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04425073,0.0009307182,0.0016746585,0.0035339699,0.009756832,0.005969387,0.0030546275,0.047534063,0.0032224949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001518781,0.000003702031,0.00003349711,0.000050037703,0.0000062125137,0.00007492461,0.00036360684,0.000025923222,0.000026365778,0.0023943074,0.99586403,0.0011421833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098194076,0.000021106638,0.0008915623,0.001136108,0.00008878206,0.0002266217,0.0034037016,0.00030932057,0.0003072971,0.012655631,0.98077583,0.0000857076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2941378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34821883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98204273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017957252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029565455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5848515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518546847","doi":"","title":"Canada-United States Cross-Border Insolvency Relations and the UNCITRAL Model Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.010090410852136375,"score_gpt":0.2649768992929738,"score_spread":0.25488648844083744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518546847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09152048,0.0023083382,0.0014796029,0.028419092,0.00025860977,0.000052688836,0.00032645694,0.000046579353,0.8755881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.914796,0.0009807361,0.0004766541,0.0059729344,0.000047898124,0.000028301643,0.00008968728,0.00003443615,0.077573426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99623615,0.00032330357,0.000066307315,0.00038105441,0.0010370993,0.0019561138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971035,0.00065854023,0.0001544603,0.00022733594,0.0012375334,0.0006187174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018251505,0.00037017497,0.0005728135,0.0016764044,0.021266136,0.016238254,0.0016745165,0.006251829,0.016580703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006858709,0.00044874166,0.00053793355,0.002930101,0.011806844,0.00410618,0.0036745262,0.006417832,0.00072169653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018108756,0.000022285261,0.0013305846,0.000009584306,0.0000068258323,0.000096097916,0.0007029929,0.0003388799,0.000035851986,0.97898394,0.015281306,0.003173576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015170382,0.000044756875,0.019860953,0.000451345,0.00014647712,0.00031844748,0.020809824,0.006878994,0.0007106233,0.5127508,0.43771926,0.00015679625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9757252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98889893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083911754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.083911754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13109967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6088252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531747003","doi":"","title":"Ties of Separation: Analogy and Generational Segregation in North America, Australia, and Israel/Palestine","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Analogy; Indigenous; Parallels; Politics; Severance; Ideology; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.034933988710014706,"score_gpt":0.35265112816755345,"score_spread":0.31771713945753877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531747003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96237916,0.0009397131,0.00063927914,0.0020494522,0.00002295217,0.000015149321,0.0000097449465,0.0000028707252,0.03394168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834025,0.00026434375,0.00013255441,0.00013467998,0.000005648289,0.000009450584,0.000004964161,0.000001662229,0.001106467],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989349,0.0006355022,0.000029138242,0.000088437766,0.00011480597,0.00019721083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989772,0.00045631523,0.00024558092,0.000073328556,0.00010955253,0.00013808579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016916541,0.00013020553,0.00020323174,0.0012909208,0.005884638,0.002861149,0.00066875905,0.0005636342,0.0029434285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032383099,0.00013916685,0.00012113657,0.001163444,0.010810578,0.0025193947,0.005001487,0.0016636351,0.00007690203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050074406,0.000075895674,0.026192762,0.00005013815,0.000014103352,0.000807102,0.8279877,0.00013507357,0.00026176978,0.12543614,0.00061261817,0.018376706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017741822,0.0000612123,0.12426179,0.0002543444,0.000020116107,0.00063036097,0.7916628,0.0007972994,0.00028313216,0.04570171,0.036279257,0.00003029275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07665243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10267625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9233476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045071645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002265504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15241253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531833688","doi":"","title":"Courting Islam: Practical Alternatives to a Muslim Family Court in Ontario","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Gender and Women's Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Political science; Law; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.04497597977453946,"score_gpt":0.35657178102186354,"score_spread":0.3115958012473241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531833688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53382665,0.0007530728,0.0019334047,0.050915975,0.00034997665,0.00033787463,0.00013980929,0.000044527736,0.41169867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.873449,0.00072802504,0.0019904254,0.0035609533,0.00007041702,0.000083626124,0.000035497163,0.000038352096,0.120043695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996804,0.0007473391,0.00009269796,0.0001926733,0.00052712613,0.0016361477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966384,0.0010729687,0.00012936049,0.0001452946,0.00060884625,0.0014050208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003007065,0.00023565741,0.0002712327,0.0005416816,0.04880595,0.0071417037,0.002112022,0.0060166223,0.020851996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063928836,0.0005442213,0.0004156758,0.0010166154,0.007202713,0.002220389,0.005402489,0.004882159,0.00072987675],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004738643,0.0004613403,0.0366193,0.00023309239,0.00006771463,0.02652886,0.27782634,0.002579314,0.004123022,0.46956527,0.09869023,0.0828317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017324771,0.0001759332,0.038411863,0.000310743,0.00008846881,0.0018829542,0.5042004,0.0025421812,0.0011486746,0.034142856,0.4167399,0.00018277789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9348589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99335325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06514108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046511438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09596996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3374657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2538692278","doi":"","title":"Continued Violations of International Law by the United States in Applying the Death Penalty to MInors and Possible Repercussions to the American Criminal Justice System","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.023300257898344827,"score_gpt":0.31985330506802306,"score_spread":0.29655304716967823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2538692278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21169478,0.014967527,0.0027809532,0.30815753,0.0052663414,0.00014183475,0.00027095,0.0000990748,0.456621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7286848,0.005535991,0.002904283,0.22589083,0.0017855908,0.00020041743,0.00013056319,0.00008114371,0.034786426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922213,0.0025890942,0.0005595556,0.0010362398,0.001522673,0.0020710758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99217904,0.004184071,0.0010819265,0.00043724576,0.0013423021,0.0007753793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011336643,0.0005045934,0.00030004655,0.0013667574,0.013298855,0.014309139,0.0016654895,0.014808736,0.0029022705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01346583,0.0005960311,0.0011831624,0.0016923428,0.009136142,0.005482053,0.005953261,0.014492025,0.0003527951],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001020143,0.00013034184,0.014197342,0.00015553914,0.000055627952,0.0021429458,0.035224907,0.00038537852,0.0010660773,0.81579083,0.09057144,0.040177647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007978041,0.00027689832,0.035072766,0.0013128181,0.00021201637,0.0011597343,0.032497033,0.00076234783,0.0020128652,0.044943012,0.8813548,0.00031591824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.120060295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2250833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120060295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005643974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008468971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23872292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2538980895","doi":"","title":"The Cost Recovery Act and Tobacco Litigation in Canada: A Model for Fast Food Litigation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Tobacco industry; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.01760770313621708,"score_gpt":0.25644350460337956,"score_spread":0.2388358014671625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2538980895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16001657,0.0030868133,0.009742564,0.13065407,0.00051371683,0.00080914394,0.0016972803,0.00019076659,0.69328904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8975685,0.0019345838,0.0034461461,0.009470015,0.00018454478,0.00021119034,0.00022293003,0.000054875305,0.086907126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936913,0.0009970824,0.00010605493,0.00052911893,0.0015364039,0.0031401129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99406093,0.0022482097,0.00040940222,0.00023962311,0.001676168,0.001365616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031122037,0.0010571354,0.0009396421,0.0036284474,0.01915436,0.01984079,0.004330593,0.01678852,0.017626332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01332856,0.0009225858,0.0017870475,0.0038418865,0.013251067,0.006486948,0.0035194827,0.009268731,0.0010417358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037017715,0.00010212772,0.0020361363,0.000022307395,0.000018657483,0.00024987824,0.0013837853,0.0036821177,0.00008436155,0.9739328,0.015303738,0.0031470773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008686473,0.0002418346,0.018339211,0.0005641676,0.00053661177,0.00049758854,0.024959859,0.08046367,0.00060237676,0.7027535,0.16959196,0.00058059377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9896965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9912846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12632178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12632178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27478555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91653293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548043238","doi":"","title":"In the Hot House: Will Canada's WTO Challenge Slaughter U.S. Cool Regulations?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Business; Agricultural economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.01025775476360593,"score_gpt":0.2630314408148038,"score_spread":0.2527736860511979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548043238","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008562634,0.00325649,0.00087306707,0.7118856,0.004560118,0.00009928206,0.0012096543,0.00012502441,0.26942822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0880358,0.0027966197,0.0012787549,0.5982055,0.0007822778,0.00008166866,0.0004356775,0.00014834387,0.30823535],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728096,0.00028505415,0.00005817453,0.00017909176,0.0009366089,0.0012601587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746597,0.00041914897,0.00009262975,0.00007802596,0.0013720591,0.00057213224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038195,0.00058822037,0.00030271357,0.00052836956,0.014286438,0.007547159,0.0017709176,0.020716596,0.023663001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049910285,0.00035268278,0.00046772845,0.00067790353,0.003991954,0.0037140343,0.0015828973,0.010727499,0.0036006127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021879527,0.00004348667,0.0019377377,0.000020181524,0.000009246661,0.0003179422,0.0010628094,0.00015698101,0.00035730502,0.08185709,0.9040043,0.0102111995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019455343,0.00002317874,0.004321823,0.0001877565,0.000018794484,0.000069488124,0.0051024486,0.00047892448,0.00035867133,0.011607688,0.9777461,0.00006573648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9378839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97174466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062116086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024481544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.083723344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17762685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602223626","doi":"","title":"Copyright Competition: The Shifting Boundaries of Convergence Between U.S. and Canadian Copyright Regimes in the Digital Age","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Competition (biology); Economics; Intellectual property; International economics; Economic geography; International trade; Political science; Law; Economic growth; Biology","score_opus":0.022850007314193486,"score_gpt":0.2667027832432738,"score_spread":0.2438527759290803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602223626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18761803,0.014885872,0.0022135486,0.2402248,0.00050387095,0.000043676464,0.00046792632,0.00009513414,0.5539472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634761,0.005005517,0.0010483227,0.012904161,0.000094041236,0.000017171973,0.000083256346,0.000045765388,0.017325722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99253243,0.00064818515,0.00013910438,0.0007726602,0.0036949373,0.0022125617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99113256,0.002461535,0.00061565376,0.00043211994,0.0037536197,0.0016045584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004668297,0.00020572123,0.00038870165,0.0042865328,0.024776788,0.017243974,0.0018780411,0.0034715054,0.0076306965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017016267,0.00025216246,0.00039499448,0.0071174004,0.019248197,0.0062036403,0.0045930985,0.0044373935,0.000322093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047220034,0.000016537704,0.00419248,0.00006631093,0.000013809444,0.00016371002,0.02596452,0.00022964939,0.00033866294,0.87551665,0.035381436,0.058069095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040470077,0.000050926927,0.0570236,0.0008898443,0.00008189085,0.0002415285,0.07682531,0.0014078281,0.0011157993,0.14791007,0.7141239,0.00028882115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98107386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9913556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12539673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12539673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14573663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9098212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619160121","doi":"","title":"Making the Time Fit the Crime: Clearly Defining Online Harassment Crimes and Providing Incentives for Investigating Online Threats in the Digital Age","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Incentive; Criminology; Business; Internet privacy; Computer security; Digital forensics; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Economics; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.08374184334142833,"score_gpt":0.359636468943007,"score_spread":0.2758946256015787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619160121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15466428,0.006912796,0.14640032,0.29696977,0.004422284,0.00096379005,0.0002032364,0.00016269358,0.38930085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83916473,0.007987436,0.10005303,0.028270602,0.0008517372,0.0011628229,0.00012618718,0.00008067835,0.022302734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825142,0.008831856,0.0016342192,0.0008195636,0.004152849,0.0020471893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9712323,0.014618118,0.004987032,0.0018377469,0.005108245,0.0022167016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012892158,0.0006041491,0.00057016814,0.004445897,0.00880762,0.014668437,0.0020162065,0.0070648454,0.0030025938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032619458,0.0005884495,0.00073660264,0.0019856838,0.021315098,0.02046259,0.012633992,0.007443188,0.00063917984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012518333,0.000115497605,0.010783444,0.00008103054,0.0000044597878,0.0003391149,0.012932133,0.00053898763,0.00032608458,0.9250575,0.0084842825,0.041325066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004006512,0.00018772898,0.029701952,0.0029215594,0.000032992422,0.0012278443,0.11420055,0.0050561815,0.0020235074,0.54032683,0.3040455,0.00023526602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023255678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053118218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023255678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00614892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020517766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06818104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W287976162","doi":"","title":"Fiscal Transparency: Global Norms, Domestic Laws, and the Politics of Budgets","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Credibility; Politics; Economics; Democracy; Political science; Fiscal policy; Public economics; Economic policy; Accounting; Political economy; Business; Macroeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.012454482753771407,"score_gpt":0.2386300720735313,"score_spread":0.2261755893197599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W287976162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13821478,0.019667951,0.019728102,0.18146239,0.0005991785,0.000042206208,0.00025564863,0.00011300354,0.6399167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98421127,0.0036057741,0.0017224824,0.0047577615,0.000266415,0.0000364386,0.000045671175,0.000044086464,0.005310132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99223524,0.00450828,0.00032762453,0.0004913414,0.0014495106,0.0009878677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873958,0.0072258906,0.0028276413,0.00080364896,0.0012332533,0.0005137718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009843943,0.0002644435,0.00033207895,0.0020547407,0.0026146253,0.011986986,0.00065574324,0.0023337966,0.0031703538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02566714,0.00019754068,0.00026439584,0.0035353184,0.016839584,0.008595662,0.0031689827,0.0038496943,0.00026002896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010683441,0.0000050648027,0.0009482338,0.000021727063,0.0000022089291,0.000023485949,0.0018077204,0.00022490321,0.000027550737,0.98937947,0.001812846,0.0057362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018518977,0.000018353601,0.005779002,0.0005767682,0.000014234039,0.00008100413,0.0057574464,0.0007110199,0.00031280654,0.87438315,0.112320505,0.00002723835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011180656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008759068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011986986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007222889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008059391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052406013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962816230","doi":"","title":"Moving from Management to Termination: A Case Study of Prolonged Occupation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Interpretation (philosophy); Temporality; Anachronism; Conversation; Law; International law; Neglect; Power (physics); Sociology; Common law; Political science; Psychology; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.030734034154920573,"score_gpt":0.3379380868074932,"score_spread":0.3072040526525726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962816230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91829145,0.0018837638,0.0042170156,0.01883681,0.00036473863,0.00018611908,0.00007684129,0.00002784162,0.056115452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98016834,0.0015231535,0.0018726597,0.0039080866,0.00018217578,0.00015611801,0.000047437356,0.000045666027,0.012096416],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99311864,0.0042886273,0.00018075795,0.00041119335,0.00070965604,0.0012911164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99443144,0.00333519,0.0006857742,0.00020310497,0.00029587667,0.0010485393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005259258,0.0006547562,0.00070700434,0.0016634205,0.022764737,0.0057660444,0.0025909645,0.0071652206,0.005269116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0103122555,0.0006157749,0.0006780412,0.001878547,0.012468814,0.004584321,0.0062994673,0.00840629,0.000541335],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010662637,0.00051467284,0.013914892,0.00021768607,0.00002013339,0.0714513,0.8312732,0.0004297764,0.0011114781,0.05894817,0.006277768,0.015734365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001661584,0.0001771978,0.005428407,0.0005616052,0.000014084734,0.01242243,0.8950085,0.00074264494,0.00046729078,0.0070896656,0.07802824,0.000043277792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012302739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034993645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022764737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006996096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048907283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050760448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993106835","doi":"","title":"Irreconcilable Differences? A Constitutional Analysis as to Why the United States Should Follow Canada's Lead and Allow Same-Sex Marriage","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lead (geology); Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.029057916912850385,"score_gpt":0.29068382459679754,"score_spread":0.26162590768394717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993106835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20920031,0.0020382078,0.007042562,0.10759358,0.0009997626,0.00034069477,0.001107699,0.00015319718,0.671524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.941246,0.00036692893,0.001492516,0.0269963,0.0002621975,0.00013600398,0.00008991388,0.000057581223,0.029352607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864364,0.0016440095,0.0004478365,0.0020326506,0.0034449666,0.0059940866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891355,0.0047140657,0.00056657434,0.0011396795,0.002714983,0.0017291865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011123985,0.00046589095,0.0012945598,0.0014733115,0.021593366,0.0120345615,0.0047426107,0.016084285,0.010636803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02440167,0.0009347885,0.0011808639,0.0020316096,0.022668688,0.0051036472,0.004070356,0.020390134,0.0007037705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028827168,0.000034911995,0.001338953,0.000012767396,0.000018369941,0.00010489647,0.001721789,0.0002544235,0.00017692764,0.9856538,0.007957863,0.0026964229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003460166,0.00009847366,0.014640067,0.00040767685,0.00034170502,0.0002304629,0.014956084,0.0029397502,0.0020467457,0.7365097,0.22717881,0.00030448154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6994125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8290534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30058748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024604868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06527631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60471535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993834148","doi":"","title":"The Challenges of Interpreting Multilingual, Multijural Legislation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Business; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.034327897028260904,"score_gpt":0.33273743132439465,"score_spread":0.29840953429613376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993834148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065010734,0.021715648,0.047442693,0.13258508,0.0029336286,0.00011381976,0.0004608962,0.00031774235,0.7294198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.934944,0.004932177,0.026178062,0.013840336,0.0020880068,0.0001948107,0.00019485752,0.00024780075,0.017380048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97887886,0.0149486475,0.0010106358,0.0014469911,0.0025376866,0.0011772153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689363,0.021876255,0.0020632143,0.002612008,0.0036956486,0.00081657135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02181277,0.000647154,0.000826084,0.00576617,0.01582229,0.021679113,0.0031169767,0.0048618703,0.0047424575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03217011,0.0005901609,0.00049377535,0.005428223,0.023779873,0.012332342,0.009704434,0.005136011,0.0008925076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012184452,0.000020143018,0.0013651447,0.00015171239,0.000028032619,0.0008517273,0.052903175,0.00030852447,0.00017861024,0.9000604,0.015443092,0.028677236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014624953,0.000024258821,0.0024851302,0.0017240281,0.00006443589,0.0013991463,0.11738161,0.0018725082,0.0011425796,0.44869074,0.42514852,0.000052442294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029963858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07033681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029963858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009805626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009700979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11535829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122337572","doi":"","title":"Fair.com? An Examination of the Allegations of Systemic Unfairness in the ICANN UDRP","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Trademark; Law; Respondent; Dispute resolution; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.04245462214613723,"score_gpt":0.2838498232113755,"score_spread":0.24139520106523824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122337572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004598226,0.031193981,0.0026233704,0.13429925,0.015250012,0.00048385467,0.00090658665,0.0014251427,0.8092196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09285519,0.04313705,0.0052302056,0.14283308,0.019806245,0.0006871921,0.0014151484,0.000794711,0.69324106],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99249977,0.0010794054,0.0003708822,0.00035245184,0.0050290045,0.00066852133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98106456,0.009522378,0.0016201743,0.0011220268,0.0058924267,0.00077848125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008395449,0.00070461514,0.00059886766,0.009678832,0.0058853803,0.009169293,0.0023546126,0.011936221,0.05721088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026637133,0.0006454767,0.0008298892,0.005202377,0.0037126937,0.005560575,0.0012757393,0.002975973,0.01049072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001263543,0.000032555068,0.000525832,0.00018068816,0.0000074880804,0.00027770762,0.00024470966,0.00010299013,0.00016222645,0.016106779,0.92802364,0.054322746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010143233,0.000023328645,0.003021133,0.0004781898,0.000016239987,0.00020535856,0.0006247274,0.00028566027,0.00023099281,0.004571765,0.9905013,0.000031180876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030316561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09215679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05721088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008143382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075496878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19138944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124158280","doi":"","title":"Foreign Investment and the Privatization of Coercion: A Case Study of the Forza Security Company in Peru","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; Human rights; Law; Foreign direct investment; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.018357768084124128,"score_gpt":0.2141360947616507,"score_spread":0.1957783266775266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124158280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687899,0.0005377735,0.00041453552,0.0017594949,0.000006920759,0.000029639663,0.000023734692,0.000007805143,0.02843025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963224,0.00034875495,0.00010219375,0.00010446835,0.0000042806414,0.00001276951,0.000012590903,0.000003886974,0.0030887532],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908125,0.0004915,0.00001897376,0.00005270474,0.00007473015,0.00028097737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988558,0.0007073878,0.00021289074,0.00004982297,0.000059445418,0.00011462808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008138042,0.00024809616,0.00023613851,0.0007472823,0.0076517556,0.003992843,0.00093376654,0.0029408673,0.0044652503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002578914,0.00022826671,0.00014130311,0.0014369888,0.005837464,0.0027950038,0.004275617,0.0025584493,0.00025328217],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018444312,0.000510561,0.07278376,0.00041231452,0.0000656994,0.049682718,0.6971279,0.0020503758,0.0024531092,0.13697554,0.006333163,0.031420477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004270744,0.00028343755,0.058650076,0.0004557246,0.00004393263,0.0056536123,0.8424659,0.0022813238,0.001277647,0.0079350015,0.080854535,0.000056204084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02988032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06571718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02988032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034216016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021943538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059412777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125852817","doi":"","title":"Cases and Controversies: Pregnancy as Proof of Guilt Under Pakistan's Hudood Laws","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Islam; Political science; Lawmaking; Sharia; Conviction; Promulgation; Adultery; Statute; Sociology; Legislature","score_opus":0.01707690228416609,"score_gpt":0.31185350774666304,"score_spread":0.29477660546249695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125852817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3208848,0.031238334,0.0037791312,0.274318,0.0021535016,0.00014569786,0.00015578669,0.00003728117,0.3672875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96564054,0.008263646,0.0006557531,0.017366441,0.0006992701,0.00003171403,0.00002379057,0.000010723107,0.0073081288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944207,0.002731844,0.0002879672,0.00066111516,0.00085228425,0.0010460125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97138447,0.025628123,0.0013220612,0.00033861614,0.000851123,0.0004756312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010684,0.0002884425,0.00035862258,0.0024993347,0.025864987,0.0115876645,0.0021708822,0.012587255,0.0036576756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024916956,0.00067698484,0.00040313532,0.0028308707,0.029293593,0.008177167,0.0061400733,0.011497555,0.00027714676],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003954799,0.000027600472,0.002688011,0.00010322394,0.000007341384,0.008056077,0.11341032,0.00017423452,0.0002290154,0.8434188,0.011949308,0.019896444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031897325,0.00011132655,0.010336353,0.0020777774,0.000046507186,0.0062249023,0.3540647,0.0008063681,0.001354182,0.16074824,0.4640366,0.00016109446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070076115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07281514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070076115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017011786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010277503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13933647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}