{"meta":{"query_hash":"ac177466d818","filters":{"venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law"},"cohort_total":25,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":25,"exported":25,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ac177466d818","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Brooklyn+journal+of+international+law"},"results":[{"id":"W1515416359","doi":"","title":"Securities Litigation and Enforcement: The Canadian Perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Legislature; Business; Perspective (graphical); Broker-dealer; Accounting; Law and economics; Finance; Investment banking; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02134926259446945,"score_gpt":0.23222053284610805,"score_spread":0.2108712702516386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515416359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0714373,0.007549725,0.00042330817,0.007109729,0.0016050251,0.00008688591,0.00007898443,0.0000048584357,0.9117042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791783,0.00013481274,0.00010444286,0.00082910014,0.00037742563,0.0000013165901,0.0000023497566,0.0000041468516,0.0006285459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949074,0.0000075974745,0.00027615344,0.00004851796,0.000061000665,0.00011601214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994512,0.000021722633,0.00022042682,0.0000436554,0.00016400362,0.00009894203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031185555,0.00005197435,0.00008918004,0.00009572092,0.00012760871,0.00008869991,0.00012195145,0.00003081477,0.00045210417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097345204,0.00004405788,0.000053887783,0.00004144132,0.00007739334,0.0003966233,0.00001394922,0.000081685095,0.000033602882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005679263,0.000008717333,0.01373986,0.0000011144039,0.00002839989,6.336969e-7,0.00087224,0.000010279862,0.0000015529622,0.9847068,0.0005169658,0.00010771109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026810815,0.000030838568,0.10456439,0.000020685302,0.0000051034503,0.00006632732,0.00079657824,0.00008015295,0.000069136586,0.27937624,0.6146408,0.000081642225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018941272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012047494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92648053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019261113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003232576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9875917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117854848","doi":"","title":"Punishing the Parent: Corporate Criminal Complicity in Human Rights Abuses","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Universal jurisdiction; Jurisdiction; Corporate liability; Law; Culpability; Subsidiary; Liability; Political science; Criminal law; Business; Context (archaeology); War crime; Parent company; Corporation; International law; Multinational corporation","score_opus":0.07493898021072984,"score_gpt":0.25390996668414484,"score_spread":0.178970986473415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117854848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9620682,0.00004863992,0.0001223786,0.0005537393,0.00061198004,0.0000788794,0.0000022598556,0.00001713153,0.036496803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99655044,0.0000056289796,0.0000777077,0.00092831696,0.00169995,0.000002032071,0.000014921102,0.000012604605,0.0007084106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985145,0.000020804022,0.0006265631,0.00013675257,0.0005230373,0.00017837515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832135,0.0000489334,0.00097460503,0.00013278713,0.00050312077,0.000019181842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003479947,0.00015649422,0.00022206246,0.00021527408,0.0005476678,0.00028888992,0.0007236337,0.000040225557,0.000370589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007995662,0.00010159936,0.00013226687,0.00012140533,0.00020545711,0.0013157856,0.00010321413,0.00031430295,0.00005066128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072631796,0.00014057997,0.020549271,0.000014340044,0.000040617622,0.00028955317,0.00010892754,0.00017206658,0.000478129,0.97622836,0.0018737003,0.000031802298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002356816,0.00006773764,0.16187458,0.00035843675,0.00007878176,0.0005142968,0.0001171839,0.0006368536,0.0008036747,0.63145447,0.20126864,0.000468534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007566008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003791355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34477392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050096893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021014577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42122734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217343614","doi":"","title":"A Human Rights-Based Approach to the Global Regulation of Humanitarian Relief: The Emerging Obligation to Incorporate Local Participation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Human rights; Political science; Law and economics; International humanitarian law; Business; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05303867542970748,"score_gpt":0.3358723347171132,"score_spread":0.2828336592874057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217343614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52744627,0.000049441456,0.24164465,0.02783559,0.0019956916,0.0009172284,0.000016447435,0.00003632855,0.20005834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99627495,2.333365e-7,0.0022529692,0.00058242865,0.00047548398,0.000010153557,0.000008060622,0.0000050181534,0.00039069192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978801,0.00021259999,0.00055488845,0.00011227672,0.001096606,0.0001435385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981615,0.000037922255,0.00044257622,0.00012142239,0.0010785286,0.00015805027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019187131,0.00008741983,0.00012515893,0.00008765376,0.0005365971,0.00012599606,0.00050633436,0.00004261302,0.0000446485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008727947,0.00004988231,0.00006990927,0.00024755904,0.00016627232,0.0002452112,0.000040345294,0.00009838552,0.000017443936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006879244,0.00008658122,0.00058521,0.0000017045858,0.000033116172,0.0000011683038,0.0062527503,0.025250245,0.000033678745,0.96473575,0.002533975,0.00041703187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013395556,0.00043659832,0.059329268,0.00019403081,0.00006699118,0.000010360434,0.002954413,0.0028089937,0.0007823908,0.3916281,0.54014146,0.00030783503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013873229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009192588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57310766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039320491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022915161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.512968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262497743","doi":"","title":"Reputational Fallacies in International Law: A Comparative Review of United States and Canadian Trade Actions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; State (computer science); Political science; International law; Compliance (psychology); Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.08039602248073814,"score_gpt":0.403834335563757,"score_spread":0.32343831308301885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262497743","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000333004,0.9433121,0.000023288489,0.0047518946,0.0010087454,0.00032287338,0.00042612385,0.000007725645,0.050113942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015462786,0.99653196,0.00026434447,0.00055621477,0.00031482868,0.000011593629,0.00036230776,0.000013785167,0.00039867967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729204,0.00026316967,0.0012542461,0.00018273466,0.00081315846,0.00019465474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756014,0.00034415652,0.0011521189,0.000082940496,0.00064335455,0.00021726497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009109055,0.00021565557,0.0008436879,0.0007282302,0.00016407146,0.00010871598,0.00049767696,0.00015557012,0.00034705267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016256195,0.00019744615,0.00032653433,0.00035723214,0.00041570957,0.00044867507,0.000033455526,0.00045427773,0.000003818492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027367136,0.00015037319,0.000038753034,0.0037864195,0.00072585593,0.00006622933,0.0038113126,0.00008517832,3.980642e-7,0.95625687,0.0009838076,0.034067445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002687915,0.00004164716,0.000053231448,0.044099215,0.00012881728,0.00012204445,0.00047800975,0.0000064520905,5.6017785e-7,0.0015115902,0.95313793,0.00015169423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050126646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18183903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9547453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008507543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015288531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95619863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263093417","doi":"","title":"A Tale of Three Takings: Taking Analysis in Land Use Regulation in the United States, Australia and Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Supreme court; Just compensation; Private property; Property law; Eminent domain; Public use; Property rights; Possession (linguistics); Common law; Political science; Law; Public property; Government (linguistics); Nonpossessory interest in land; Law and economics; Land law; Land tenure; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.0354172027079544,"score_gpt":0.2889424336074119,"score_spread":0.2535252308994575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263093417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963779,0.00004232344,0.000118456825,0.001511119,0.00007900998,0.000056507633,0.000010973433,0.0000012091236,0.0018025236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993978,0.00001712274,0.00012223695,0.000092082475,0.00008279435,7.250661e-7,0.00001434277,0.0000019619629,0.00027094854],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989598,0.00009338881,0.00034949023,0.000058411828,0.00044437897,0.00009453647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926573,0.00014857156,0.0003362628,0.000042350162,0.00018492948,0.000022182634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057455583,0.000049532428,0.00012445783,0.00023939049,0.00005212383,0.000081302394,0.00019024443,0.00002609589,0.00007751696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008085764,0.00003082635,0.000036326463,0.00037736088,0.00008842765,0.00027843122,0.00001072904,0.000111006615,9.94044e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058963917,0.000051728864,0.80870795,0.0000033176204,0.00007938557,0.000055787594,0.00073926063,0.010175377,0.000055136785,0.17969526,0.0002626394,0.00011517441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037116185,0.000018052282,0.9244629,0.00005403627,0.000030658033,0.000007742487,0.00014169235,0.0012828187,0.00003321088,0.0025595964,0.07098431,0.00005382198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17713566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010576679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008898447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12570621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278966334","doi":"","title":"Modernization of Commercial Law: International Uniformity and Economic Development","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Commercial law; Jurisdiction; Legal profession; Institution; Legal research; Modernization theory; Political science; Comparative law; Legal history; Corporate law; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.020139776523495176,"score_gpt":0.2933650379325496,"score_spread":0.2732252614090544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278966334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3298962,0.00014544769,0.001990038,0.0043185316,0.0018711583,0.000104284656,0.000022189737,0.000017268434,0.66163486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99529696,0.00018918744,0.0017711732,0.0010469077,0.0006179014,4.2318104e-7,0.000011685885,0.00000713452,0.0010586521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852073,0.00007463555,0.00063094625,0.00010815197,0.00054377806,0.000121750614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863875,0.000080635444,0.0005279219,0.00005835965,0.00058963045,0.00010468131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006838551,0.00009889712,0.00017045917,0.00012533751,0.00014684182,0.000106519605,0.0005157627,0.000055080152,0.00028235366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009650983,0.00009646332,0.00008337548,0.00003088867,0.00019802735,0.0007993118,0.000041363823,0.0001449821,0.00001360487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010957045,0.000086423155,0.0021950016,0.0000015907103,0.0000806725,0.0000062672407,0.00069945096,0.00018354537,0.00020821892,0.9917554,0.0001798052,0.0044940026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013605624,0.00014558641,0.044473603,0.00013326755,0.000021804699,0.00004287838,0.00018892616,0.00048736957,0.002492502,0.015864238,0.93456614,0.0002230937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018102012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007900191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97589123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019838696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017574523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.393366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291128159","doi":"","title":"The Hague Principles and the Choice of Non-State \"Rules of Law\" to Govern an International Commercial Contract","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Arbitration; Law; Statute; Conflict of laws; State (computer science); Terminology; Political science; International law; International arbitration; Autonomy; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.01890843267775967,"score_gpt":0.26201842626993466,"score_spread":0.243109993592175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291128159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5991041,0.00006275357,0.0016938213,0.012305337,0.0022655854,0.00028952752,0.000037146805,0.000011722619,0.38423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987356,0.000030537325,0.00037796132,0.010576559,0.0012785763,0.0000052183,0.00001381489,0.000013824793,0.0003475071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814326,0.000043785174,0.00080776424,0.000122021265,0.00075792085,0.000125243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719244,0.0004035644,0.0010770821,0.0001457822,0.0011526258,0.000028500495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011319395,0.00013958702,0.00023638285,0.000104791725,0.0001620896,0.00029386886,0.0008972205,0.00003382898,0.00008732257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041234543,0.00008417656,0.00014324582,0.000050522092,0.00038321473,0.0011948758,0.0001557254,0.00016694037,0.000014455074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005529171,0.00009557397,0.0034866491,0.000010996139,0.00016604751,0.000001202945,0.00009889634,0.00031107207,0.0007471952,0.9931742,0.00029783495,0.001057427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038600578,0.00010934423,0.10544888,0.00019465323,0.0000633413,0.000023284894,0.00006360293,0.017350208,0.002129066,0.028704775,0.8418575,0.00019526517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011086549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014526976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96446943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030404357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025067817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34326205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342078010","doi":"","title":"The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Toward a Definition of \"Foreign Official\"","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Law; Political science; Business; Enforcement","score_opus":0.0606271019766473,"score_gpt":0.2683681754329646,"score_spread":0.2077410734563173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342078010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35541216,0.00050828786,0.0008742995,0.0012030979,0.0019285772,0.00014471845,0.0000059627123,0.000019761077,0.6399031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952167,0.00004242841,0.00039906218,0.0005237213,0.0035063135,0.0000022313245,0.000010885228,0.000014341196,0.00028430208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863565,0.000015716472,0.00055106956,0.0000748645,0.0005417907,0.0001808994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965864,0.00017728595,0.0023144993,0.00010600482,0.00079468894,0.000021145994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071893295,0.000116960335,0.00016928143,0.00012541898,0.00017455488,0.00024027942,0.00044082443,0.00004563975,0.0003480325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011783957,0.00007493714,0.0001584025,0.00008606764,0.00010788324,0.0021064316,0.00007797696,0.00017095976,0.00006814949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022766169,0.00012059048,0.0075270776,0.000024079009,0.00008728778,0.000007309312,0.00004026395,0.000009350198,0.00016953205,0.98979235,0.0013828534,0.00061166973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008794454,0.000057113557,0.017047731,0.00017274386,0.0001440574,0.00011016095,0.0004413236,0.00016194623,0.00052365527,0.6195732,0.36069396,0.00019470448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008323308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013396799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63980454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032682685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042449446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3810712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2488304506","doi":"","title":"Bilingual Interpretation of Enactments in Canada: Principles v. Practice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Political science; Linguistics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012269091142209096,"score_gpt":0.30492908268188895,"score_spread":0.29265999153967986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2488304506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67505324,0.0006066137,0.002080806,0.0036646556,0.001873773,0.00015851221,0.000012562887,0.00000644441,0.31654337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99735814,0.00006578969,0.0016876932,0.00056633115,0.00015877355,9.419183e-7,0.000002732206,0.0000052169703,0.00015436039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846095,0.00010660706,0.00055901386,0.00007562153,0.00068484864,0.00011294142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984937,0.00019773471,0.00057127065,0.0000523884,0.00062614214,0.00005877246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005738911,0.00006384954,0.00013571516,0.0001155218,0.000037598373,0.00003186648,0.00029320308,0.000034329045,0.000083868785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012626983,0.00005772922,0.00007560786,0.00010036731,0.00006524362,0.00086668535,0.000020993151,0.00015244682,0.0000026175196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007761055,0.00038499886,0.0075180805,0.000020692953,0.00030138236,0.00030535046,0.06635343,0.010431707,0.0027447327,0.9028784,0.000053833497,0.008231269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014097684,0.0018119136,0.050633315,0.005001069,0.0003727039,0.0005452914,0.12211426,0.0019437278,0.09453329,0.026188456,0.68126607,0.0014922359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7658559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92779356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010262885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026946114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4780125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510899649","doi":"","title":"Commentary: Globalism and National Media Policies in the United States and Canada: A Critique of C. Edwin Baker's Media, Markets and Democracy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalism; Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Media studies; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.013876827113013303,"score_gpt":0.2827106186478392,"score_spread":0.2688337915348259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510899649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86398894,0.002141324,0.0000022634288,0.12800176,0.00022081845,0.000052883126,0.00013084909,0.000001928671,0.005459213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98157054,0.0038168847,0.00009710173,0.014278064,0.00019569279,9.424721e-7,0.000016463511,0.000002669634,0.000021663915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863976,0.0003305147,0.0003006001,0.00007333624,0.0005291862,0.00012659426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981236,0.0012567905,0.00016739056,0.00002988482,0.0003411934,0.00008114723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009895313,0.00007611005,0.00013779102,0.00008710736,0.00015550847,0.00004110821,0.00020847544,0.00006265312,0.000068741174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005788989,0.00005874597,0.000023133423,0.00008233521,0.00068527926,0.00020552699,0.000037475882,0.00017067551,1.2707623e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058291003,0.000071401315,0.07927116,0.000010310682,0.000107295586,0.00005775669,0.029244374,0.0000065828117,0.0000107262495,0.82944816,0.061344866,0.0003690708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017928202,0.00008041333,0.56338984,0.00019077964,0.000042061834,0.0003069118,0.03171503,0.00015859901,0.000020975696,0.19992554,0.202148,0.00022901648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.300415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55981225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6295226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009079409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084968255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7042436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518546847","doi":"","title":"Canada-United States Cross-Border Insolvency Relations and the UNCITRAL Model Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.010090410852136375,"score_gpt":0.2649768992929738,"score_spread":0.25488648844083744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518546847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.764124,0.00058555085,0.006332522,0.012066299,0.001219976,0.00016454399,0.000036642512,0.00002174313,0.21544872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861359,0.000031807904,0.00023252645,0.00995656,0.00065790245,0.0000010498936,0.000024891347,0.000012974668,0.0029463693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876463,0.0000061480287,0.0004711216,0.00009384799,0.0005022699,0.00016200311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984769,0.000105749095,0.00054497004,0.000086004475,0.00076474436,0.000021589565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005930746,0.00011259151,0.00014054497,0.000091787195,0.00021743489,0.00028025577,0.00025154694,0.00003544898,0.00016958616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000760849,0.00007775851,0.000072376555,0.00016266113,0.00021673054,0.0010317842,0.00007251342,0.00022020719,0.000006099151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024468687,0.000025305082,0.0053212205,0.000006555761,0.000061188526,0.00002774713,0.00003683936,0.009409426,0.000022023927,0.98107255,0.0035892164,0.00018321972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002250709,0.0000088699835,0.015202357,0.00006827345,0.000046979287,0.00004531211,0.000107089196,0.022718316,0.0000300487,0.04718923,0.9121654,0.00016741744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20626079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46901253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93388337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007232038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000116885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79902476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531747003","doi":"","title":"Ties of Separation: Analogy and Generational Segregation in North America, Australia, and Israel/Palestine","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Analogy; Indigenous; Parallels; Politics; Severance; Ideology; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.034933988710014706,"score_gpt":0.35265112816755345,"score_spread":0.31771713945753877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531747003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917523,0.00012695858,0.00025570864,0.003209194,0.00023965973,0.00004627339,0.000012160356,0.0000019863307,0.0043557156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99787176,0.00022642373,0.0010634531,0.00009396806,0.00034071118,7.634826e-7,0.000011942643,0.0000025009688,0.0003884791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922913,0.000050062677,0.00029584553,0.00007517303,0.0002814992,0.000068296875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911976,0.000050116145,0.00045287158,0.000052195894,0.00027501985,0.000050012255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002599671,0.00005453298,0.00011970595,0.000086659085,0.00019373001,0.00010146792,0.00014029,0.000038298072,0.000053657466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014254611,0.00005193615,0.000029925515,0.0000345699,0.00033025935,0.00058552047,0.000023943023,0.000085292435,0.0000011901009],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069896196,0.000052642852,0.49018374,0.000008133881,0.00004258672,0.000012373124,0.0015420686,0.00036508995,0.00048470747,0.50155616,0.00019128498,0.0054913075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006386357,0.0000902404,0.9708255,0.000056321205,0.000015291633,0.000037368573,0.00036534463,0.000277819,0.00017123092,0.0053455713,0.022087656,0.000089016925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017604362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018875502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4962106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028994386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053243806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531833688","doi":"","title":"Courting Islam: Practical Alternatives to a Muslim Family Court in Ontario","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Gender and Women's Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Political science; Law; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.04497597977453946,"score_gpt":0.35657178102186354,"score_spread":0.3115958012473241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531833688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7198814,0.00003000076,0.001066753,0.02644564,0.0010279343,0.00012311287,0.000002809322,0.000011660565,0.2514107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865086,0.000024255829,0.006178666,0.0018898844,0.00088832935,0.0000029748417,9.462025e-7,0.000009218644,0.0044971397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978673,0.00014772498,0.00056004926,0.00015087907,0.0009883296,0.00028570954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987963,0.0002289199,0.00027660726,0.00007050498,0.00042221358,0.00020545363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012728078,0.00011224487,0.00019583393,0.0002089545,0.00014521774,0.00014464921,0.00043412295,0.00006618495,0.00057442527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026257997,0.00009825829,0.00010710084,0.00009933951,0.000102095335,0.00069826207,0.000049993196,0.00043672073,0.0000773156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003761217,0.0008686267,0.027752837,0.000004710344,0.00029854482,0.0005021459,0.2150753,0.0016735863,0.0017257029,0.7399913,0.007609434,0.0041217078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015770798,0.00020283702,0.06230815,0.00020174062,0.000021361406,0.00012230352,0.018897811,0.00013538693,0.0004550015,0.011136788,0.9046294,0.00031210273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01412292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.329618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007697066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059726683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99244213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2538692278","doi":"","title":"Continued Violations of International Law by the United States in Applying the Death Penalty to MInors and Possible Repercussions to the American Criminal Justice System","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.023300257898344827,"score_gpt":0.31985330506802306,"score_spread":0.29655304716967823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2538692278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9475706,0.00006750868,0.0019213684,0.019998519,0.00090023986,0.00049943535,0.0001103491,0.000013261122,0.028918704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99515736,0.000039075403,0.00065827003,0.0025638486,0.00042900784,0.000035046312,0.000016705393,0.000010999867,0.0010896813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977984,0.00021744466,0.00063691474,0.00016204153,0.0009746786,0.0002105381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978104,0.00049109914,0.0005043315,0.00014166084,0.0009239143,0.0001285612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011935914,0.00013401976,0.00019580842,0.00019554756,0.0007434216,0.0002443297,0.0010960063,0.000033274988,0.000042738367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021480296,0.000071404604,0.00010394593,0.00020672957,0.00042886176,0.0002456328,0.00010437901,0.00028527796,0.000008846365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013880363,0.00006290263,0.0007592836,0.000005777466,0.00008342408,0.000009859324,0.007065695,0.0030207187,0.0001931922,0.98827314,0.0002824774,0.00010470931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047451085,0.0010742273,0.082963355,0.002865833,0.0009607729,0.00080570905,0.115060076,0.0026097998,0.0031757792,0.14253494,0.64200705,0.001197334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013940005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013274842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84573823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002976382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013512679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99262625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2538980895","doi":"","title":"The Cost Recovery Act and Tobacco Litigation in Canada: A Model for Fast Food Litigation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Tobacco industry; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.01760770313621708,"score_gpt":0.25644350460337956,"score_spread":0.2388358014671625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2538980895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92387956,0.0008870373,0.003666489,0.024126694,0.0017708106,0.00087273883,0.000046658097,0.000008715472,0.044741273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984608,0.00013401371,0.00017266248,0.00033920878,0.0004163329,0.00002340223,0.0000023733269,0.0000051621187,0.00044600535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989943,0.000047068304,0.00036175744,0.0000713634,0.00038482517,0.00014067133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873257,0.00027386134,0.00028753377,0.000034234203,0.0005949014,0.00007690283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051845645,0.000057418285,0.000101995545,0.000035761168,0.00023806287,0.00022588349,0.0001938557,0.00003610089,0.000012022469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036271545,0.000043086973,0.000039117913,0.00005825023,0.00006974727,0.0007438099,0.000014184202,0.00009488106,9.538688e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012227372,0.0000402697,0.023841707,0.00002096791,0.00010477013,0.000002311307,0.0034639987,0.0022120187,0.0001761354,0.9132238,0.004090448,0.052701283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039821784,0.0005731501,0.090660304,0.0011996854,0.00005500329,0.00005399428,0.016641451,0.042108152,0.0010402275,0.5135018,0.32938758,0.0007964426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53700304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9526038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4156008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040484816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001131602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4660801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548043238","doi":"","title":"In the Hot House: Will Canada's WTO Challenge Slaughter U.S. Cool Regulations?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Business; Agricultural economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.01025775476360593,"score_gpt":0.2630314408148038,"score_spread":0.2527736860511979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548043238","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17505394,0.0002691888,0.00019647823,0.63082224,0.008915076,0.00040612332,0.00003272974,0.000045474593,0.18425877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939452,0.00004203621,0.00038692827,0.0027035999,0.00139396,0.0000023797413,0.0000021754124,0.000016665585,0.0015070866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981521,0.0001408214,0.00041514702,0.00010218016,0.0010154239,0.00017433858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988167,0.00021996282,0.00027991814,0.00013467543,0.00045853935,0.00009019734],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007790906,0.00009011952,0.000121670426,0.00009819197,0.00021552293,0.00013292213,0.0008289991,0.000063958534,0.0012858321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027529136,0.00006993046,0.00005698827,0.00022117831,0.00020301154,0.00063804624,0.000024634815,0.00040678977,0.00001244961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021028702,0.00006475016,0.0015557635,0.0000013792021,0.000024331346,0.000049883714,0.0019636182,0.00003875478,0.00017204712,0.9829345,0.013030397,0.00014357378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034755774,0.00001456402,0.02023371,0.00001917574,0.0000076131837,0.000057554622,0.00044954405,0.000009713122,0.00013376538,0.0034310776,0.97520673,0.00008902225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06611272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89296556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9795034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013946796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005756619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602223626","doi":"","title":"Copyright Competition: The Shifting Boundaries of Convergence Between U.S. and Canadian Copyright Regimes in the Digital Age","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Competition (biology); Economics; Intellectual property; International economics; Economic geography; International trade; Political science; Law; Economic growth; Biology","score_opus":0.022850007314193486,"score_gpt":0.2667027832432738,"score_spread":0.2438527759290803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602223626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2370252,0.0005542385,0.0003799131,0.069976784,0.0012685736,0.0002583516,0.00010406285,0.000009637433,0.69042325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778044,0.00006949506,0.000060196457,0.00048679917,0.0004019694,0.0000012671446,0.0000018091121,0.0000055615606,0.0011924343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985644,0.00017752551,0.0004010112,0.00008766147,0.00058241223,0.00018694758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847114,0.0007964882,0.00024215666,0.00008641481,0.00031766592,0.000086132015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010570793,0.00008254228,0.00015096673,0.00008484308,0.00046351008,0.0003989967,0.0007386536,0.000050604212,0.0005834494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055648095,0.000038228256,0.00006601237,0.00011037485,0.0019977242,0.00048818195,0.000035061177,0.00016643181,0.000013834705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003091095,0.00001281518,0.011265118,0.0000031126813,0.000051904488,0.00003783713,0.008129257,6.301201e-7,0.000040985684,0.9771384,0.002342073,0.0009469415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032120533,0.0000743945,0.00809066,0.00022685132,0.000012507252,0.00004638999,0.0017611504,0.000004215572,0.0004662069,0.023555843,0.9653431,0.00009744535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02029904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.120253384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9630011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012684894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043816157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9862249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619160121","doi":"","title":"Making the Time Fit the Crime: Clearly Defining Online Harassment Crimes and Providing Incentives for Investigating Online Threats in the Digital Age","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Incentive; Criminology; Business; Internet privacy; Computer security; Digital forensics; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Economics; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.08374184334142833,"score_gpt":0.359636468943007,"score_spread":0.2758946256015787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619160121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84723544,0.003351827,0.008264341,0.10490512,0.0015976728,0.0012743699,0.00031422428,0.000049172006,0.033007804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960781,0.00009565412,0.0010096146,0.0010459975,0.00075549673,0.000005111476,0.000004117377,0.000010297691,0.0009956611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985585,0.00015929111,0.00040370968,0.00012460718,0.000546465,0.00020739327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789137,0.0014294056,0.0003638684,0.0000884878,0.0001836684,0.0000431962],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012560036,0.00010538913,0.0001399256,0.000047717782,0.00052785216,0.00052306836,0.0007008974,0.00004098394,0.000020119563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006493518,0.000042738433,0.000100515295,0.000073304895,0.003090391,0.0006149462,0.000077865014,0.00017994204,0.0000024142066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004407304,0.000081762795,0.0042034015,0.000003969998,0.00006614771,0.0000107952355,0.008125174,0.00000795456,0.00025824408,0.9737725,0.00043054583,0.012995423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004917772,0.0007383743,0.055550497,0.0032293915,0.00019185587,0.00023548989,0.0350932,0.0011379812,0.00041020598,0.57009995,0.32764882,0.0007464565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004085879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002609486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40367258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008717294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000114306094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W287976162","doi":"","title":"Fiscal Transparency: Global Norms, Domestic Laws, and the Politics of Budgets","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Credibility; Politics; Economics; Democracy; Political science; Fiscal policy; Public economics; Economic policy; Accounting; Political economy; Business; Macroeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.012454482753771407,"score_gpt":0.2386300720735313,"score_spread":0.2261755893197599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W287976162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23103663,0.008626005,0.0048354575,0.08811155,0.001773135,0.00022678344,0.00090584444,0.000014654829,0.66446996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961161,0.00018875631,0.0004513941,0.0025197193,0.00031212234,6.7214984e-7,0.0000029432338,0.0000047659364,0.00040353823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987472,0.000014660386,0.00087794533,0.00010068476,0.0000727438,0.00018675333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991678,0.00011023772,0.00041945247,0.00010517308,0.000081220445,0.00011609201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031717203,0.000104249404,0.0003693133,0.00005607446,0.0000538867,0.00005001189,0.00032954922,0.000056990157,0.000097519354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113845206,0.00007911545,0.00018279282,0.000051829305,0.00027217343,0.00017106447,0.00002200481,0.0001416736,0.000015924676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007630101,0.000065588414,0.0032244409,0.0000076578835,0.000065446344,0.000004861488,0.00009150212,0.000045093795,0.0000013194424,0.9955318,0.0006532733,0.00023272185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022270181,0.00018365424,0.05567587,0.00003748906,0.000017334532,0.00019746347,0.000031137653,0.000469428,0.00002300222,0.87150395,0.06951954,0.000114080016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022182956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002398194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76507944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057638972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020865786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32262346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962816230","doi":"","title":"Moving from Management to Termination: A Case Study of Prolonged Occupation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Interpretation (philosophy); Temporality; Anachronism; Conversation; Law; International law; Neglect; Power (physics); Sociology; Common law; Political science; Psychology; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.030734034154920573,"score_gpt":0.3379380868074932,"score_spread":0.3072040526525726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962816230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9625112,0.00008060485,0.0008566981,0.0003566792,0.0009593326,0.00022224558,0.000006336714,0.000007261683,0.03499967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99712896,0.0000066290027,0.0012266089,0.00015007766,0.00082073564,0.0000058890746,6.996801e-7,0.0000049367745,0.00065547996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987297,0.000090756155,0.00038429658,0.00010380932,0.0005893212,0.000102130325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986885,0.000059010832,0.00031445603,0.0000747059,0.00079253345,0.00007077379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046059315,0.000067060435,0.00013293317,0.00013907974,0.00018030232,0.000053203712,0.0002610061,0.000023846178,0.000046361576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009424189,0.000060533897,0.000049264767,0.000111601374,0.000090048925,0.00026366627,0.00007845085,0.00005861716,0.000012731181],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085208454,0.0024062938,0.45356512,0.000028484452,0.0018304276,0.003805781,0.16902487,0.00006743433,0.0005901083,0.13422243,0.0011835829,0.23242338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0091357,0.0051595937,0.27107164,0.0010172881,0.00054602313,0.00083304924,0.60073555,0.00016667567,0.0021614104,0.012134935,0.09618187,0.0008562814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016776437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014339556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43171066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007185441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029331264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8001809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993106835","doi":"","title":"Irreconcilable Differences? A Constitutional Analysis as to Why the United States Should Follow Canada's Lead and Allow Same-Sex Marriage","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lead (geology); Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.029057916912850385,"score_gpt":0.29068382459679754,"score_spread":0.26162590768394717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993106835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7355784,0.001121904,0.0025098196,0.11665821,0.0015993089,0.00031550866,0.00014510968,0.000025476775,0.14204626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98603994,0.0001403682,0.00019606025,0.008854242,0.00074383203,0.0000035198855,0.000010120916,0.000004728338,0.0040071933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979998,0.00012993101,0.0004458793,0.00014468402,0.0010612163,0.00021849739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837464,0.00034145158,0.0002958971,0.000072979485,0.000700185,0.00021484359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007848195,0.00012000232,0.0002619031,0.00017699643,0.00046190526,0.00029305537,0.0004843483,0.00005587048,0.00061249454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040892512,0.00008404135,0.00011070728,0.00043003526,0.00039632374,0.00031733766,0.00004566139,0.00019379641,0.00000788337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002446061,0.00014099249,0.08472808,0.000014784921,0.002680044,0.00009718005,0.007097592,0.005025707,0.00013601752,0.84757835,0.04911333,0.003143295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003320664,0.000051367177,0.0030581248,0.000055411438,0.00012623699,0.000023869417,0.0022257671,0.0003331509,0.00009174153,0.0026256263,0.99093115,0.00014548858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69195735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9188748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9418178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027275478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009137398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67063856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993834148","doi":"","title":"The Challenges of Interpreting Multilingual, Multijural Legislation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Business; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.034327897028260904,"score_gpt":0.33273743132439465,"score_spread":0.29840953429613376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993834148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15873827,0.0057254927,0.00056651636,0.017439889,0.0038256918,0.0001425798,0.000008862351,0.000024654262,0.81352806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99577147,0.002010773,0.0009288314,0.00014100854,0.0006224147,9.673619e-7,5.409598e-7,0.000008626637,0.00051534857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842155,0.00011361864,0.0005476454,0.000085455926,0.0006936024,0.00013812978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979014,0.00037325494,0.0005778065,0.000070389564,0.001025486,0.000051708153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010807497,0.00008330598,0.00013310526,0.00006542432,0.00030593525,0.000067056826,0.0005678346,0.000033252716,0.000023787627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010156219,0.000058932197,0.00015975736,0.000046588553,0.0004134593,0.0003559756,0.00005747857,0.00016493947,0.00000982792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074414216,0.000051797404,0.00035565093,0.000002316274,0.0001123788,0.000007220306,0.0060457583,0.00025978035,0.0003618019,0.9874109,0.00006284398,0.0052551595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023286636,0.00037128705,0.008452154,0.00094495906,0.000042462212,0.000067367895,0.016817564,0.000119205084,0.006467502,0.05300299,0.9110783,0.0003075665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003232217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018204052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9344079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013420255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009953648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24031852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122337572","doi":"","title":"Fair.com? An Examination of the Allegations of Systemic Unfairness in the ICANN UDRP","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Trademark; Law; Respondent; Dispute resolution; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.04245462214613723,"score_gpt":0.2838498232113755,"score_spread":0.24139520106523824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122337572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67652595,0.0003817039,0.000571369,0.008692965,0.0011588525,0.0003819303,0.000016711303,0.000008825519,0.31226167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980679,0.00006335256,0.00008320847,0.0001828243,0.00019659911,0.0000034703355,9.995791e-7,0.000006769831,0.0013948515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743813,0.0007220682,0.0006241967,0.00008269905,0.0010134632,0.000119450815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980488,0.0003744243,0.0005678289,0.00015370877,0.0008210827,0.00003416298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017575596,0.00007617995,0.00015871556,0.00011807779,0.00014757254,0.00004690189,0.0011914275,0.000063852625,0.00042094884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006503217,0.000045012763,0.00012387212,0.00027672757,0.0004089526,0.00045692502,0.00003623412,0.00022240252,0.0000060115185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003123243,0.00034401103,0.0010081166,0.000017831951,0.00006632645,0.0000056732765,0.045534726,0.00073696184,0.0017738716,0.9467636,0.0008543858,0.0028632923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010710245,0.0032349585,0.20062856,0.008609781,0.000566674,0.001921138,0.28002456,0.02778085,0.03885128,0.07066617,0.3548376,0.0021682058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070376793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022150562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8760974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012279545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008616506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46090946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124158280","doi":"","title":"Foreign Investment and the Privatization of Coercion: A Case Study of the Forza Security Company in Peru","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; Human rights; Law; Foreign direct investment; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.018357768084124128,"score_gpt":0.2141360947616507,"score_spread":0.1957783266775266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124158280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97609806,0.00014776,0.00024684545,0.000046044777,0.00012713658,0.00017177012,0.0000017020069,0.0000028687548,0.023157805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997198,0.000016355809,0.00016676323,0.000041775897,0.000026072892,0.000003259708,2.2662573e-7,0.0000053447434,0.000020380612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992509,0.000058437574,0.0003820215,0.00004015037,0.00022019302,0.000048286387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999574,0.000048246166,0.00018295897,0.00008801157,0.000088932866,0.000017836848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003642863,0.000058863396,0.00013190553,0.000065032254,0.00002430378,0.000007955185,0.0001808212,0.000016730777,0.000015646365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023380502,0.00003276818,0.000043038053,0.000059185582,0.000083876665,0.00004814379,0.00005791163,0.000102481274,1.1240345e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037524136,0.00089442736,0.09382119,0.00016507551,0.00083323487,0.00024326584,0.10228146,0.028592318,0.00012969985,0.77145785,0.00031655902,0.0008896672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.049750578,0.0026416972,0.3363438,0.0030106588,0.0008331991,0.00771112,0.2149522,0.31495667,0.007444825,0.04764753,0.013695247,0.0010124645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016207622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014641038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7238103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022300177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006291514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13362476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125852817","doi":"","title":"Cases and Controversies: Pregnancy as Proof of Guilt Under Pakistan's Hudood Laws","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Islam; Political science; Lawmaking; Sharia; Conviction; Promulgation; Adultery; Statute; Sociology; Legislature","score_opus":0.01707690228416609,"score_gpt":0.31185350774666304,"score_spread":0.29477660546249695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125852817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018832032,0.003801569,0.00067978736,0.00045116484,0.0008926262,0.00014747599,0.00009600429,0.00001102327,0.9750883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93876135,0.00014661063,0.00026906264,0.0002859472,0.00043929482,0.0000015697244,0.000003128762,0.000009032673,0.060084008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985155,0.000064667336,0.0005056702,0.000113301176,0.00059500634,0.00020588358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842435,0.0002967372,0.00044692247,0.00011372673,0.00060506834,0.00011317431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029615284,0.00010923083,0.00021524356,0.0000756244,0.00017464627,0.00010613721,0.0004068712,0.00006950594,0.00017638683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026461325,0.00009822159,0.00012023019,0.000057467274,0.0004731388,0.00024860544,0.000049155402,0.00010957713,0.000001964264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006443946,0.00011043918,0.0012719944,0.000012896391,0.0000732772,0.00005852664,0.00016270234,0.000012348806,0.00021175954,0.99766546,0.00009379212,0.00026236582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011894096,0.00024011424,0.0010353402,0.00039821307,0.000048654056,0.00011163909,0.0016248832,0.0000059994004,0.0015580086,0.08231208,0.9113162,0.0001594699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036017266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041733445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9199293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009372018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025803965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54447573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}