{"meta":{"query_hash":"2fe4575f21a6","filters":{"venue":"Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2fe4575f21a6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Bucharest+Working+Papers+in+Linguistics"},"results":[{"id":"W4393038542","doi":"10.31178/bwpl.25.2.5","title":"Animacy in the acquisition of differential object marking by Romanian monolingual children","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Nautical Research Society","funders":"","keywords":"Animacy; Psychology; Romanian; Object (grammar); Feature (linguistics); Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Rasch model; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.020961239484444297,"score_gpt":0.2443893497779899,"score_spread":0.2234281102935456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393038542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96611816,0.00009154818,0.000019197365,0.00078132394,0.0037147824,0.0005303111,0.000113984446,0.00018555995,0.02844515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99557894,0.000052828884,0.00013548089,0.00011209343,0.0036887056,0.000021889224,0.00027078367,0.000051268005,0.00008799252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788743,0.00016168362,0.0006600212,0.00036421398,0.0004598911,0.00046674802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986581,0.00055820943,0.00031453927,0.00032960196,0.00010297635,0.000036523892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060742407,0.00025994363,0.0003465336,0.00036755018,0.00023973861,0.00019660796,0.00042833565,0.00009017958,0.0001028726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020944276,0.00023575874,0.000091122434,0.00030097723,0.00018982857,0.000015712681,0.00009467066,0.00035129552,0.000021589707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021721794,0.00055260054,0.18285301,0.00018451273,0.00015836058,0.00015544458,0.194359,0.0005048795,0.00065096666,0.61187416,0.000751659,0.0077381865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005460432,0.00062105077,0.81359357,0.0037210046,0.00047893828,0.000018825267,0.044416223,0.01452406,0.00053432997,0.07361935,0.040226255,0.00278596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020513607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033066778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6307406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008664203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004172703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9613962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407547300","doi":"10.31178/bwpl.26.2.5","title":"AN OVERVIEW OF GENERATIVE THIRD LANGUAGE ACQUISITION RESEARCH","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics","topic":"Speech and dialogue systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; McGill University","keywords":"Generative grammar; Linguistics; Computer science; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09087528004048123,"score_gpt":0.3953488440549833,"score_spread":0.30447356401450204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407547300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11457976,0.024728877,0.028377837,0.0010427913,0.016488088,0.0021803265,0.000056950485,0.0008335138,0.81171185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98168343,0.00011647451,0.017332125,0.00021010876,0.0004887863,0.000016428638,0.000012367964,0.000007474793,0.00013282585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983116,0.00032282178,0.0003208703,0.00035261633,0.00036939533,0.0003227453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986254,0.00037223013,0.00008885714,0.0006312229,0.00022168536,0.000060581657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011555307,0.000114856586,0.00022737282,0.00035403317,0.000112431655,0.00010733104,0.0007283128,0.00008652192,0.0000041439525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012626601,0.000113751936,0.00004229188,0.0012012576,0.00010149853,0.000023025175,0.00016909673,0.00025059702,0.000008783584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003684025,0.00017466125,0.011281265,0.00015997901,0.000022643062,0.00010722512,0.0044714417,0.00058629457,0.0058323345,0.9531792,0.000685246,0.02346291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0084513575,0.0028487807,0.2363372,0.02229802,0.000120498844,0.000030135474,0.013562944,0.12978806,0.09987149,0.16699809,0.31541994,0.0042734845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027530157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027815823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86710364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000971811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016046158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46386692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128171343","doi":"10.31178/bwpl.27.1.5","title":"THE USE OF GENERIC SUBJECTS BY ROMANIAN HERITAGE LANGUAGE SPEAKERS IN MULTILINGUAL CONTEXTS","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Romanian; Heritage language; Plural; Noun; Context (archaeology); Cultural heritage; First language","score_opus":0.0253694049513904,"score_gpt":0.29495834033744234,"score_spread":0.26958893538605194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128171343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8831247,0.03064594,0.00001580787,0.00030446486,0.011577385,0.0015178266,0.0001168135,0.00010736476,0.072589666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923869,0.0011801546,0.0008847555,0.00069318846,0.00029799566,0.00004154745,0.00007978424,0.000081699014,0.0043540187],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99563223,0.00050452526,0.0014438316,0.00085261697,0.00039555287,0.0011712409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99624985,0.0021450683,0.0005092774,0.0008639037,0.000110855966,0.00012105642],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077106094,0.00060795323,0.00077759725,0.00046406337,0.00025271287,0.0001959296,0.0007733801,0.0004216867,0.00010026375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007125912,0.0005753344,0.0001717526,0.0015527809,0.000598722,0.000016643151,0.00024783134,0.00090504787,0.000019164743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026932226,0.0020120272,0.5648399,0.00061299774,0.0007730485,0.0028218632,0.11643272,0.0013284432,0.001946286,0.013723261,0.00787742,0.2849388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007994105,0.00020939042,0.095095776,0.0031619233,0.00017614732,0.0000050049075,0.04227599,0.0011578248,0.00052769796,0.00012465862,0.84763074,0.0016407282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002627269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027316697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8397533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025935072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032658887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}