{"meta":{"query_hash":"2fe4575f21a6","filters":{"venue":"Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2fe4575f21a6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Bucharest+Working+Papers+in+Linguistics"},"results":[{"id":"W4393038542","doi":"10.31178/bwpl.25.2.5","title":"Animacy in the acquisition of differential object marking by Romanian monolingual children","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Nautical Research Society","funders":"","keywords":"Animacy; Psychology; Romanian; Object (grammar); Feature (linguistics); Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Rasch model; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.020961239484444297,"score_gpt":0.2443893497779899,"score_spread":0.2234281102935456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393038542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989102,0.00011420657,0.00007387942,0.000011820425,0.0000011570452,0.0000021585759,0.000023078625,0.000009381649,0.00085417915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999119,0.00012876312,0.00023751607,0.000010844478,9.2500807e-7,0.0000052804407,0.000048194484,0.000008109932,0.000441295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990716,0.00014466494,0.000106241925,0.0002742636,0.00021540668,0.00018776247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998314,0.0004861541,0.00064125605,0.00025518326,0.00017397423,0.00012946138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011942715,0.00046854198,0.00052281946,0.00084976695,0.00032190696,0.001245189,0.00034863284,0.00041291892,0.0023537748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031069105,0.0004325117,0.00037047223,0.00032926223,0.0011320977,0.0008842933,0.0013090451,0.0006487945,0.0006788785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010526415,0.0004329655,0.68729293,0.0003412675,0.00006637544,0.006438109,0.034638297,0.00036199467,0.19078137,0.0015472696,0.0003701593,0.076676644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021589267,0.0010369556,0.95878273,0.00005693056,0.00007098805,0.008240002,0.0056752516,0.00036304118,0.022429403,0.00064050977,0.0026347127,0.000047785736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031865325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003381618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031865325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034062707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004014244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007874191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407547300","doi":"10.31178/bwpl.26.2.5","title":"AN OVERVIEW OF GENERATIVE THIRD LANGUAGE ACQUISITION RESEARCH","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics","topic":"Speech and dialogue systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; McGill University","keywords":"Generative grammar; Linguistics; Computer science; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09087528004048123,"score_gpt":0.3953488440549833,"score_spread":0.30447356401450204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407547300","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059012766,0.86450934,0.027690103,0.0044773375,0.00057626853,0.000056740897,0.00020405569,0.00025223216,0.096332625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07964343,0.86980766,0.022537269,0.0022780842,0.001211176,0.00014493204,0.0006516487,0.0002918486,0.023433857],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992562,0.00025828514,0.00007160804,0.00016299119,0.00018243304,0.00006860173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981687,0.0014054842,0.00008514305,0.0001366156,0.00015224578,0.000051745596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015235157,0.0007933174,0.0008138012,0.005007663,0.0009227136,0.0035180817,0.0013234238,0.0016816187,0.011223375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002161203,0.0006488332,0.00078103965,0.0049401624,0.0024914688,0.0034553325,0.0018664296,0.0017715497,0.0040614777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008779095,0.000104821505,0.0022027926,0.0061773635,0.000060351245,0.00050911197,0.0039610676,0.0013055701,0.0018973238,0.27885726,0.017798757,0.6870378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008795915,0.000058972582,0.0037112897,0.0039528976,0.00004017521,0.0021251482,0.00094477553,0.0010243395,0.0015432292,0.08599369,0.9005489,0.000047803656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030988911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00289738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011223375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026778588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020235665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03754592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128171343","doi":"10.31178/bwpl.27.1.5","title":"THE USE OF GENERIC SUBJECTS BY ROMANIAN HERITAGE LANGUAGE SPEAKERS IN MULTILINGUAL CONTEXTS","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Romanian; Heritage language; Plural; Noun; Context (archaeology); Cultural heritage; First language","score_opus":0.0253694049513904,"score_gpt":0.29495834033744234,"score_spread":0.26958893538605194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128171343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992981,0.000053770524,0.00005168817,0.0000042200236,4.863009e-7,0.0000016298324,0.000011077058,0.000001977478,0.0005770557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99945265,0.000065590335,0.00017659235,0.0000037189554,4.801149e-7,0.000001818808,0.000023136146,0.0000030245735,0.00027307426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905163,0.00021862803,0.000060854047,0.00022935306,0.00025219814,0.00018729141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986926,0.0003364013,0.00038580596,0.00020779589,0.00023341473,0.00014387726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000760725,0.0004000066,0.0003876459,0.0010280238,0.0006675107,0.00122893,0.00037366615,0.00030584686,0.0014663229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026371276,0.00025624598,0.00018682405,0.00047853694,0.0013040135,0.00060622965,0.0011003793,0.00035809798,0.00028408237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003225896,0.00009490432,0.7309159,0.00017380278,0.0000467973,0.0026141535,0.15324576,0.00014292577,0.06544568,0.0007366969,0.00014078911,0.046119962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000664135,0.00028490473,0.9236978,0.00004047658,0.000033692577,0.005101087,0.06232677,0.000261562,0.005941318,0.0002262126,0.0020311875,0.00004828274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019244134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048717074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019244134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048546417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038264215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}