{"meta":{"query_hash":"3908eaf38d71","filters":{"venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly"},"cohort_total":40,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":40,"exported":40,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3908eaf38d71","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Business+Ethics+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W2007619103","doi":"10.5840/beq20122216","title":"Shareholder Engagement in the Embedded Business Corporation: Investment Activism, Human Rights, and TWAIL Discourse","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Shareholder; Corporate social responsibility; Corporation; Corporate law; Argument (complex analysis); International law; Hard law; Law and economics; Shareholder resolution; Scholarship; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Business; Corporate governance; Soft law; Finance","score_opus":0.10282444520275512,"score_gpt":0.30146289890223904,"score_spread":0.1986384536994839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007619103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.983919,0.00012250926,0.0004529757,0.0067478246,0.0008489864,0.0008949651,0.0000064186847,0.00014707985,0.0068602087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932288,0.0000030542844,0.00008334688,0.0033935166,0.0022143836,0.00014758049,0.00022118239,0.00004641014,0.00066170306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749756,0.00015368705,0.000541667,0.00047523616,0.00073459564,0.0005972712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824274,0.00016890322,0.00042319714,0.0006205344,0.00050423044,0.00004037144],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019851013,0.00045103612,0.00037064546,0.0003444996,0.0012248259,0.0011040778,0.00047061776,0.00023531805,0.00025418057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023824063,0.00028017262,0.00005759558,0.0009904423,0.00034236853,0.003348137,0.00010566356,0.0007968752,0.00013567819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005578022,0.0008045145,0.0049492694,0.00052570645,0.00004163906,0.000052519707,0.013405723,0.00001489446,0.00019902193,0.9736604,0.0051893196,0.0011011816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023251348,0.00006202835,0.576636,0.00035948498,0.00022808394,0.000022527327,0.003233576,0.00017266146,0.000019288282,0.259639,0.15607154,0.0012306552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024260203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006843007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71402144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005151164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006323109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018656756","doi":"10.5840/beq20122217","title":"The Limits of Corporate Human Rights Obligations and the Rights of For-Profit Corporations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Reservation of rights; Obligation; Business; Property rights; Law and economics; Right to property; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Complicity; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.10060674543608629,"score_gpt":0.2857559038107298,"score_spread":0.18514915837464352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018656756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98861974,0.00022527356,0.0019009225,0.0041813347,0.0007054009,0.0010775287,0.000025982321,0.000061289866,0.0032025224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806374,0.000004162231,0.00012862017,0.00013948718,0.0007552022,0.00009116167,0.00008146903,0.00002161115,0.00071452995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837756,0.00006593003,0.00066189136,0.0002071338,0.00037700328,0.00031049494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99561137,0.00080252724,0.0013251577,0.0004927552,0.0017455413,0.000022646895],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016676552,0.00022887786,0.00035057453,0.00015189826,0.0023905819,0.00026007224,0.00038056448,0.00017081789,0.000020189686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037186102,0.00012344707,0.0001070998,0.00054410327,0.0012774592,0.0009974912,0.00004067108,0.00028606036,0.000016441581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007279086,0.000034637145,0.0017195276,0.00018319231,0.00004443321,3.1946539e-7,0.0008609118,0.000003914042,0.00026848086,0.9960294,0.00063991395,0.00014251212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012682431,0.000024544197,0.031436954,0.000079959405,0.00018495401,0.0000018362698,0.00014520377,0.00023613304,0.00014664423,0.9578613,0.0084150005,0.0001992525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011989329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077363183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03816809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009816452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005210259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040018884","doi":"10.5840/beq200818436","title":"Beyond Moral Reasoning: A Review of Moral Identity Research and Its Implications for Business Ethics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":410,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Situational ethics; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral disengagement; Moral agency; Extant taxon; Identity (music); Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Moral psychology; Moral reasoning; Business ethics; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Foundation (evidence); Moral development; Social identity theory; Social psychology; Normative ethics; Psychology; Social group; Political science; Social science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.731941843112248,"score_gpt":0.5878128708414749,"score_spread":0.14412897227077304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040018884","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002235043,0.9661455,0.0035204513,0.024280377,0.0018087566,0.0029272693,0.0005573084,0.00006506643,0.0006728839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000117852855,0.99391145,0.0021364414,0.00053860986,0.0007901422,0.0010600602,0.0005563837,0.00014676557,0.0007423238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98520094,0.0030047938,0.0038794025,0.002091619,0.004813502,0.0010097182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90023965,0.03907471,0.0029478678,0.0029499575,0.054423094,0.00036472746],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03851157,0.0009001003,0.0037162064,0.0016717076,0.002016109,0.0008656593,0.0032915813,0.0030765294,0.00006704208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10445834,0.00072715775,0.0005920594,0.01169511,0.0018113498,0.0016368664,0.00042707525,0.006071384,0.000091191425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002094091,0.00034199646,0.00005686856,0.23111983,0.00009614359,0.000005350898,0.002618423,0.0000014188771,0.0000014970476,0.4648282,0.009582831,0.29132652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031233355,0.00015138793,0.0023303796,0.1320018,0.00043047997,0.00026996157,0.00032763873,0.000015728252,4.2577486e-7,0.3489511,0.51423985,0.00096888386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037262955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042308847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50465703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023075267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0129849035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063877999","doi":"10.5840/beq200414321","title":"An Investigation of Social Influence: Explaining the Effect of Group Discussion on Consensus in Auditors’ Ethical Reasoning","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conformity; Dilemma; Audit; Normalization (sociology); Ethical dilemma; Viewpoints; Social psychology; Psychology; Positive economics; Accounting; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Business; Law; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.08761001831235642,"score_gpt":0.4075835983556798,"score_spread":0.3199735800433234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063877999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96935046,0.00001309463,0.0010647883,0.028237306,0.00096996565,0.0002492256,0.0000061772357,0.000023470104,0.00008550685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884516,0.0000037461145,0.00045708838,0.0003437,0.00028142854,0.000030317635,0.00001447185,0.000018575314,0.000005539282],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99368584,0.0021815922,0.0011304693,0.0005010621,0.0022305301,0.0002704922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98695016,0.010123216,0.00085931655,0.00063232,0.0013611421,0.00007384981],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019234682,0.00022521046,0.0004652342,0.00039072582,0.00046516367,0.00015260637,0.0006964473,0.00095831597,0.000012032163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014453372,0.00012056643,0.00008438605,0.0020207153,0.001168329,0.00032275927,0.00003526712,0.002174185,0.000009648803],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011347566,0.0002799556,0.10263437,0.000597267,0.000029779936,0.0000147733535,0.42418718,0.023973348,0.03315571,0.388414,0.00020365475,0.025375223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012034375,0.0009248327,0.86869866,0.0010543967,0.00002221554,0.0000060409393,0.0115695745,0.0003727452,0.00187569,0.11397123,0.00004474837,0.0002564388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080960215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066834025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7660643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067231216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000647761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080793351","doi":"10.5840/beq20122212","title":"Guest Editors’ Introduction: Human Rights and Business","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Human rights; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.036601832370911254,"score_gpt":0.25270880857213573,"score_spread":0.2161069762012245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080793351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8980777,0.0004023908,0.0008791071,0.018605886,0.06389634,0.00073141966,0.000008366946,0.0009797232,0.016419029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7543415,0.0000022782517,0.00010082872,0.00051649765,0.24350339,0.00002592616,0.00014821996,0.000053361262,0.0013079972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978518,0.000034953504,0.0004587285,0.0005015938,0.00054133474,0.0006115856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766743,0.00007354778,0.0003187567,0.0005281057,0.0013565897,0.00005557091],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008249047,0.0004106463,0.00038065974,0.00034751132,0.0014459573,0.00076087925,0.0002978115,0.00035661345,0.0003991698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030003534,0.00034835172,0.00005534077,0.00087941997,0.00034848426,0.0036292877,0.0000901802,0.00060199003,0.0006012615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004121405,0.00034296684,0.0030881509,0.00074141176,0.00004398961,0.00001888412,0.001031634,0.0000019884742,0.00043798625,0.88011366,0.11340968,0.00072842103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055903394,0.000015435195,0.055292852,0.00006831651,0.00009792611,0.000020801795,0.00007532812,0.000011330417,0.000017140832,0.08924786,0.8540133,0.00058062415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001807387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001250289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7908658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033283606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003486651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095411304","doi":"10.5840/beq20147212","title":"A Responsive Approach to Organizational Misconduct: Rehabilitation, Reintegration, and the Reduction of Reoffense","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Punitive damages; Rehabilitation; Work (physics); Criminology; Whistle blowing; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.025624127449964472,"score_gpt":0.24174404329479734,"score_spread":0.21611991584483287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095411304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53869635,0.00019733942,0.14977136,0.27600524,0.0013927399,0.002062755,0.000005794139,0.00025754544,0.03161088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948924,0.0000035930873,0.0028764184,0.0013312758,0.00050233176,0.000048432335,0.000024696368,0.000017525712,0.00030329387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988302,0.00010823599,0.0003533208,0.00026545482,0.00032883915,0.00011393982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99633324,0.0004347256,0.00023650168,0.00027410535,0.0027116784,0.000009760978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014909853,0.00013898348,0.0002205313,0.00018605776,0.00037241945,0.00015112812,0.00013584986,0.00008224696,0.00001368681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029837028,0.00009529776,0.000034823628,0.0010132726,0.00040808207,0.00042922903,0.00003278517,0.00016050253,0.000021916547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003290746,0.00004271954,0.00038572532,0.00020587599,0.000018978883,5.433971e-8,0.0066667027,0.00023157285,0.000538927,0.98657507,0.0033305637,0.0016747597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046829856,0.00018649746,0.3017829,0.00038929252,0.00019167503,0.000025144034,0.03094613,0.01079487,0.00006336176,0.60284287,0.047274936,0.0008193463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020359457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003737091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4561961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000124075905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046677964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.388613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108177500","doi":"10.5840/beq200818324","title":"The Conditions of Our Freedom: Foucault, Organization, and Ethics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Normative; Normative ethics; Business ethics; Subjectivity; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Information ethics; Meta-ethics; Applied ethics; Power (physics); Critical management studies; Value (mathematics); Extant taxon; Michel foucault; Engineering ethics; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04804574641721316,"score_gpt":0.2639517791510207,"score_spread":0.21590603273380754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108177500","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40552697,0.0038898226,0.06579475,0.46390542,0.008383608,0.0030343886,0.00008260775,0.0015449594,0.047837462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958071,0.00049734436,0.00020223334,0.0016422668,0.00094557024,0.000009937301,0.000082043,0.00003639602,0.0007770702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871874,0.000030955573,0.0003424795,0.00021740819,0.00049406366,0.0001963557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964184,0.00039674525,0.0002718613,0.00022836559,0.0026735663,0.000011054119],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006310829,0.0001728464,0.00018444809,0.00013097537,0.0020790834,0.00018254381,0.0002622827,0.00016720779,0.00005064785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016551611,0.00013399051,0.000026967225,0.0013282606,0.00032676742,0.00058064144,0.000110296816,0.0003967574,0.00007490169],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014001239,0.000094957766,0.04436685,0.00050479674,0.00010555866,0.000010176339,0.0031090842,0.00006105581,0.00011022991,0.9110064,0.04028541,0.00033147974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018220379,0.000051131825,0.7185048,0.00019567316,0.00031199635,0.000028830626,0.011629569,0.00063748343,0.000039284274,0.09063885,0.17516413,0.00097620394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002981713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004579341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8203676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000105288045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009007937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115699352","doi":"10.1017/beq.2015.1","title":"There Is No Rawlsian Theory of Corporate Governance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Business ethics; Corporate governance; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political philosophy; Subject (documents); Primary goods; Epistemology; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.1878543675589971,"score_gpt":0.3464473367484481,"score_spread":0.15859296918945098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115699352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04363802,0.0008334506,0.003527083,0.11656432,0.0026539632,0.00041022687,0.00014762863,0.00020871033,0.8320166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938116,0.00008113623,0.00021345727,0.0025490122,0.000575836,0.0000054481693,0.0000036472304,0.000017597578,0.0027422782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975122,0.0007082422,0.00029183715,0.00022848425,0.0008850652,0.0003741552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966889,0.00079767226,0.0002896665,0.00033110144,0.0016444314,0.00024824566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036934318,0.00014266622,0.00023758993,0.000028263477,0.0002685251,0.00006131132,0.0004486641,0.0005208715,0.0001569041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018983991,0.00013049487,0.00006743263,0.0004285074,0.001589613,0.00030616004,0.000021176149,0.0007258673,0.0003607747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005385567,0.000056900175,0.000109007015,0.000061632156,0.000011956133,0.0000067861915,0.047609437,0.0000013367645,0.000022160115,0.94935036,0.00088484585,0.0018317108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028756022,0.00009728945,0.0021728324,0.00009541099,0.00001657809,7.52565e-7,0.004252507,0.000010866207,0.000038907332,0.96197844,0.030861486,0.00018734878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00370897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000584694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95017356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006758022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014299881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58569956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132282013","doi":"10.5840/beq201222445","title":"The Political Perspective of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critical Research Agenda","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Perspective (graphical); Corporate social responsibility; Political science; Corporate governance; Public administration; Public relations; Management; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.2856677451487856,"score_gpt":0.4339731349356768,"score_spread":0.14830538978689117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132282013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.869914,0.0002965323,0.0006582794,0.102636136,0.0014705693,0.00079710706,0.000015076955,0.00020793342,0.024004359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957905,0.0000020311497,0.00011249826,0.00081832096,0.002956632,0.000041544557,0.000007397682,0.0000558012,0.00021526685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994286,0.0008611056,0.0009879968,0.00052095845,0.0018188197,0.0015251039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810247,0.006849076,0.0006882617,0.0007362244,0.0106243435,0.00007741494],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019584458,0.00027887523,0.00044107248,0.0003645028,0.0020790957,0.0005465901,0.0005296057,0.00044747084,0.000059851922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045075346,0.00022771917,0.00020029028,0.0026482218,0.0030253136,0.0012717197,0.000264712,0.00174931,0.0001656097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004988574,0.00024547253,0.00710016,0.0002462155,0.00002710762,0.000014580765,0.00326668,1.825943e-7,0.0011797461,0.98470044,0.00049070374,0.002229831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037992094,0.00005475062,0.13425432,0.000072874725,0.00007886509,0.000009607589,0.060739715,0.00009913823,0.00008181548,0.7961722,0.0076641967,0.00039261498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033826246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087456784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18852828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032422532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010945263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155160774","doi":"10.1017/beq.2015.2","title":"Agonistic Pluralism and Stakeholder Engagement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Pluralism (philosophy); Agonism; Power (physics); Stakeholder engagement; Stakeholder analysis; Context (archaeology); Agonistic behaviour; Stakeholder theory; Public relations; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.22360615789706909,"score_gpt":0.31598939620550226,"score_spread":0.09238323830843317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155160774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9740428,0.00016609454,0.002273715,0.010912984,0.0011759643,0.0004916391,0.000003241109,0.000359045,0.010574545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958412,0.0000040781115,0.00031827748,0.0021588006,0.001012734,0.000025551426,0.0000325465,0.00004573072,0.00056105654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978589,0.00008000268,0.0005165402,0.00045698104,0.0007073019,0.00038030092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973311,0.00026200005,0.00043372888,0.0003877022,0.0015371314,0.000048380603],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036464622,0.00025637067,0.00029234344,0.00020226346,0.00038121446,0.0008270046,0.00019981516,0.00021333284,0.000042999967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032334102,0.00025029958,0.000044750108,0.0007529317,0.00021434187,0.0010202625,0.0001258923,0.0006030848,0.00015879839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008735782,0.00085137703,0.07722076,0.00325659,0.00027219555,0.0011825532,0.03730975,0.00025496437,0.0035683839,0.51708597,0.015935432,0.34218845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046271402,0.00016076911,0.25114062,0.00046278094,0.00043393404,0.000059651895,0.028360665,0.003598621,0.000031185315,0.33144847,0.377055,0.0026211855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022198379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068561995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36111954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007168568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033682113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166058840","doi":"10.5840/beq200919320","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue: Globalization as a Challenge for Business Responsibilities","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Globalization; Corporate social responsibility; Politics; Corporate governance; Ambivalence; Political science; State (computer science); Positive economics; Political economy; Public relations; Sociology; Economic system; Social science; Law and economics; Economics; Management; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.15828367259953502,"score_gpt":0.42273911855003,"score_spread":0.26445544595049497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166058840","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016710132,0.00017726274,0.08510954,0.8808497,0.011838542,0.0011495801,0.000032401622,0.00012102177,0.004011804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8011205,0.00029337092,0.0055892346,0.019150421,0.15212762,0.00038077775,0.00020419952,0.00010202842,0.021031847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99471354,0.0005725924,0.001006958,0.0010374561,0.0021765002,0.00049293623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833469,0.0036531466,0.00040040113,0.0015449513,0.010920504,0.00013410828],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0111270975,0.00032650793,0.0004056194,0.00046006494,0.0011542155,0.0011889825,0.001158927,0.0005076864,0.0005673087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039090414,0.00022933117,0.00011006188,0.003959473,0.00024169213,0.00088714313,0.000042632215,0.00055061455,0.000771298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008045191,0.0003063301,0.00004172946,0.00008516638,0.000014901237,0.0000022566642,0.046499826,0.0012816205,0.00017045827,0.39297804,0.33292508,0.22489005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025790825,0.00026030643,0.024402084,0.000052237665,0.000020121883,0.000013444125,0.0061319685,0.000111503294,0.000023425584,0.36678693,0.6016722,0.00026792145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019549471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011075725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8616993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001433141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011622512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2196966265","doi":"10.1017/s1052150x00008423","title":"Business Ethics Quarterly: Business Ethics and the Theory of the Firm","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Business; Information ethics; Public relations; Philosophy of business; Content (measure theory); Marketing; Political science; Business model; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.26367693775295953,"score_gpt":0.3933365559904039,"score_spread":0.12965961823744437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2196966265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50454867,0.0032903838,0.060662936,0.4125654,0.013179477,0.0018854471,0.00012357545,0.00026159937,0.003482534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885871,0.0015900887,0.0007305699,0.0060801464,0.0008787405,0.00011533523,0.000024838128,0.00011596496,0.0018772088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97901416,0.008734374,0.002732095,0.001625261,0.006864613,0.0010295095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.882095,0.08610371,0.0022739621,0.0043437644,0.024916226,0.0002673468],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.052955132,0.0008871649,0.001387254,0.0005660572,0.00514378,0.00088718627,0.0039285445,0.0027776028,0.00017963038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07625015,0.00049907947,0.00035948894,0.008230697,0.010504346,0.001276157,0.00036622473,0.009707141,0.00011141531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009448529,0.00059739075,0.0071125426,0.0012320346,0.00016373835,0.000029123878,0.40026727,0.0005076725,0.0003971921,0.5662469,0.0029267138,0.019574556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002307276,0.00009487582,0.4490262,0.0007859847,0.00017909097,0.00030446536,0.026023243,0.0003036291,0.000050338036,0.51048774,0.009550539,0.00088665605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025720187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00223445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48403847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100949204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006670008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277504637","doi":"10.1017/beq.2015.30","title":"Inverting Donaldson’s Framework: A Managerial Approach To International Conflicts Of Cultural And Economic Norms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Host (biology); Value (mathematics); Political economy; Cultural conflict; Sociology; Economic system; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.13694322049366012,"score_gpt":0.29419169470994144,"score_spread":0.15724847421628133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277504637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86071444,0.00023205439,0.047936887,0.0040093106,0.002736981,0.00028175392,0.00023424845,0.00005243019,0.08380192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99298173,0.000035586087,0.00572021,0.00060289085,0.0003605549,0.000025285808,0.000037478116,0.000016045484,0.00022020581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987276,0.000022819047,0.00063464575,0.0003729584,0.000039629944,0.00020234247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990823,0.000093189214,0.0003094986,0.0002450672,0.00012341503,0.00014652118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010704278,0.00015519795,0.00034988654,0.00020104626,0.00009709328,0.00013724579,0.0003043652,0.00024237257,0.0000511974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036033193,0.00017102726,0.00005485209,0.00011736863,0.00018562797,0.0005475806,0.00006441108,0.00031601236,0.00021362651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005196869,0.000047695026,0.0018493833,0.00003918529,0.000046169,7.134086e-7,0.012938125,0.0007519267,0.000012190106,0.9835707,0.00027413765,0.00041779416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036415164,0.00035133673,0.029660748,0.00022811089,0.000034763663,0.00007394259,0.011101236,0.015111603,0.000089688896,0.74898624,0.1892105,0.0015103035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007787851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000065421984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23458447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117987256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007229151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69742894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335442800","doi":"10.5840/beq20122213","title":"Ethics, Enlightened Self-Interest, and the Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: A Critical Look at the Justificatory Foundations of the UN Framework","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Obligation; Foundation (evidence); Law and economics; Corporate social responsibility; Shareholder; Business; Political science; Corporate governance; Law; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.10154768273416805,"score_gpt":0.3194393840836499,"score_spread":0.21789170134948188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335442800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9150204,0.00021970693,0.0013279623,0.07906638,0.0014447697,0.0010544924,0.000017929537,0.00015648284,0.0016918393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99373794,0.0000032944522,0.000254477,0.0041016648,0.0012461512,0.00007038781,0.000013606716,0.00004062626,0.00053183385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679244,0.0007405465,0.0007360031,0.0005042738,0.00072224723,0.0005044898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99181545,0.004461665,0.0006079173,0.0016147376,0.0014425723,0.0000576439],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064082975,0.00036094672,0.000412454,0.00014900125,0.0040601846,0.0005953504,0.00089891657,0.00045254297,0.00025806107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010829819,0.00017681776,0.00016227036,0.0008185518,0.0024930832,0.00068959384,0.00037286786,0.0017787231,0.00016389179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002977255,0.00016071333,0.0009893859,0.00024479692,0.000047959547,0.0000027271092,0.0063761966,0.0000015139915,0.00020526107,0.9907102,0.00088429527,0.000079214755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006693487,0.000027471951,0.07218196,0.0002488565,0.000342274,0.0000084073345,0.00058716844,0.000050362774,0.00011486164,0.8910486,0.03436222,0.00035844065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008374041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007219221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09966158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073221454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015734672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345668280","doi":"10.1017/beq.2016.27","title":"Moral Salience and the Role of Goodwill in Firm-Stakeholder Trust Repair","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Goodwill; Misconduct; Stakeholder; Construct (python library); Business; Salience (neuroscience); Stakeholder theory; Social psychology; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Accounting; Law; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.21754119712404943,"score_gpt":0.37201228440174294,"score_spread":0.15447108727769351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345668280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9416172,0.0009924833,0.0018580798,0.050909445,0.00091488025,0.00031961338,0.000018363664,0.000051339768,0.0033186034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983805,0.00015906237,0.00045672918,0.00037717505,0.00009937497,0.000028697805,0.0000010705751,0.000013422941,0.00048396553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964794,0.0005640606,0.0008517742,0.00051363884,0.0013104214,0.00028074172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883318,0.008829589,0.000384336,0.0009002042,0.0014928097,0.0000612566],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010057233,0.00017267402,0.000365775,0.00024244055,0.00019626679,0.00014879381,0.00068900886,0.00030496035,0.000091017086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009433267,0.00008386384,0.00007382896,0.0012838517,0.0015205494,0.00061483815,0.000068540605,0.00044964577,0.000031389838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025806396,0.00015988875,0.15016344,0.00006820436,0.000013541508,0.0000044212607,0.039007,0.000029720553,0.000906214,0.702257,0.0004468747,0.10668566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000986465,0.000040136798,0.3546122,0.00018918765,0.000009686994,0.000009954643,0.006758487,0.00034928057,0.00007798682,0.63373256,0.0030680287,0.00016604245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011369225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012766388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20444877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027697854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043012263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398033375","doi":"10.1017/beq.2014.2","title":"Corporate Governance in the Common-Law World: The Political Foundations of Shareholder Power, by Christopher Bruner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. 318pp. ISBN: 978-1-1070-1329-2","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Power (physics); Politics; Shareholder; Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Economic history; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.0649859530000985,"score_gpt":0.2565826675910659,"score_spread":0.1915967145909674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2398033375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4333765,0.0033677209,0.0018912127,0.27145126,0.0037511687,0.0030212079,0.0012658514,0.0003968424,0.28147826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872285,0.000050009516,0.000021831322,0.0071245176,0.0004372537,0.000016710017,0.00019528948,0.00004615036,0.0048797536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720174,0.0001763537,0.00055689394,0.00047779264,0.0009740844,0.0006131115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966907,0.00035372665,0.0009635778,0.0009130123,0.0010298279,0.000049175676],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011795047,0.00038184796,0.00043423235,0.00008158264,0.0004212018,0.0004996503,0.0012192961,0.00023030357,0.000046900823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118908974,0.00028725166,0.000116697585,0.0016491526,0.00082086405,0.0018731983,0.0001698307,0.0009901171,0.000095876705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008889532,0.00020479716,0.0021806764,0.00009637612,0.000019030476,0.000040543222,0.00020006484,0.000028903369,0.000027502581,0.70704025,0.289949,0.00012397235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001688553,0.00004773794,0.067253485,0.00019455612,0.00011010991,0.00001187283,0.0026331511,0.0005628966,0.000012500369,0.0026737223,0.924241,0.00057038356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10098148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020220889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7043665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000141189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003523456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520850800","doi":"10.1017/beq.2016.45","title":"Professionalism, Agency, and Market Failures","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Agency (philosophy); Business; Market failure; Shareholder; Ideal (ethics); Business ethics; Law and economics; State (computer science); Industrial organization; Economics; Microeconomics; Corporate governance; Finance; Law; Management; Political science","score_opus":0.2798185655756876,"score_gpt":0.4402573974422764,"score_spread":0.1604388318665888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520850800","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45407578,0.0009537527,0.0482276,0.47797456,0.006376862,0.0005053415,0.00005678047,0.00020542185,0.011623872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862558,0.00016109021,0.0011594595,0.0011247378,0.00029765852,0.000039727074,0.0000032912587,0.000024233386,0.010933979],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958599,0.00060803624,0.00067413575,0.0006953577,0.001815491,0.00034706894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98653203,0.009581054,0.0003112953,0.00081156654,0.0026444672,0.000119585915],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0080528185,0.00022464253,0.00028951213,0.00029936782,0.0005118313,0.00040666727,0.0006705898,0.00048312964,0.0014014723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010815021,0.0001225868,0.0000571323,0.0009163745,0.0005659837,0.0008707413,0.00009038622,0.00048047688,0.00025906364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013686524,0.00019776858,0.014579707,0.00017419539,0.000028805218,0.000020476227,0.020893374,0.0000011938945,0.004443636,0.30410552,0.04969844,0.60572004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034569652,0.00003730416,0.37796175,0.00026797294,0.000009905049,0.000021006406,0.0014081878,0.000020886786,0.000043254317,0.5604521,0.059158184,0.00027377438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017878631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002785123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6054463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003550154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594006143","doi":"10.1017/beq.2016.77","title":"The Problem of Unilateralism in Agency Theory: Towards a Bilateral Formulation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Agency (philosophy); Unilateralism; Argument (complex analysis); Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Epistemology; Law and economics; Principal–agent problem; Sociology; Moral hazard; Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Microeconomics; Politics; Incentive","score_opus":0.06799479555579228,"score_gpt":0.2714001653646418,"score_spread":0.2034053698088495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594006143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92587465,0.0006307951,0.0026764264,0.009665317,0.0017083973,0.0007613143,0.0000997985,0.00004163414,0.058541667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988659,0.00017382484,0.00014297944,0.000112502596,0.00018547854,0.000034819368,0.000010967458,0.00002665466,0.00044688067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821293,0.0000636199,0.0010240178,0.0003212858,0.000057420762,0.00032074694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979065,0.00013089934,0.0010619732,0.0007097697,0.00014609958,0.000044776065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031891838,0.00014699536,0.00044698978,0.00013983752,0.00054724206,0.00035728602,0.0006180567,0.00028752928,0.000029282874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013636958,0.00014904718,0.00010009564,0.00011435415,0.00027264236,0.0006231473,0.000045130793,0.0002947326,0.00006250141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004125432,0.000033550696,0.02411929,0.00008548705,0.00002464988,0.0000021631745,0.008112435,0.000023992827,0.000017966613,0.96024215,0.000025964795,0.0072710784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004745672,0.00004980961,0.26677844,0.000060667342,0.0000031330637,0.0000012182797,0.00008855026,0.00044489576,0.000012297084,0.72905844,0.0028587545,0.00016922773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007627873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002357993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24265914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007938137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008521901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601841016","doi":"10.1017/beq.2016.73","title":"Talk Ain’t Cheap: Political CSR and the Challenges of Corporate Deliberation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Corporate social responsibility; Normative; Politics; Positive economics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Democracy; Law and economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.1139052896668244,"score_gpt":0.3079195108891107,"score_spread":0.1940142212222863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601841016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9123155,0.0002998036,0.0006639798,0.074406214,0.0004986986,0.00046721275,0.0000027503772,0.00008178751,0.011264072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982866,0.000028873323,0.00008328205,0.00070678093,0.0007517101,0.000020033443,0.0000062650206,0.00002734188,0.00008913469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998234,0.0000874787,0.0005552893,0.00033528023,0.00046880267,0.00031915974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99588615,0.00045037057,0.0015189704,0.00071224815,0.001409787,0.000022461163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036598982,0.00019798226,0.00036828304,0.00009572299,0.0008987781,0.00068735733,0.00034871444,0.0002390999,0.000013383616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042047757,0.00015101288,0.00007686003,0.00014752471,0.001214932,0.0011039625,0.00013855098,0.00042980118,0.000016215363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020195809,0.000043626,0.0018327044,0.00044245977,0.00002301753,0.000020173386,0.00074193696,0.000001911729,0.0003529913,0.9704911,0.0000173716,0.02583075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018818974,0.000028308314,0.3405326,0.00019615784,0.00011999818,0.00001646075,0.0027915912,0.0017499508,0.000047774163,0.6511224,0.0011526602,0.00036020332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022992627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017393841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3386999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022894934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017999025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69127655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605631482","doi":"10.1017/beq.2016.80","title":"<i>Guest Editors’ Introduction:</i>Corporate Sustainability Management and Environmental Ethics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Corporate sustainability; Sustainability; Business; Environmental ethics; Corporate social responsibility; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Management; Public relations; Economics; Philosophy; Engineering; Ecology","score_opus":0.04763707272516954,"score_gpt":0.2817546425493376,"score_spread":0.23411756982416804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605631482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86435086,0.00010297222,0.0017355967,0.10742303,0.02099708,0.0015634778,0.00001626694,0.00045312222,0.0033576174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9621309,0.000033259086,0.00022643221,0.0007667168,0.035477776,0.000056008455,0.000088466506,0.00006494129,0.0011555223],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665064,0.0001144935,0.0007251864,0.0009806532,0.0009781223,0.0005509352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99546796,0.0002502822,0.0017799855,0.0015011443,0.000950093,0.000050538692],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051477826,0.0004158272,0.00041764695,0.00022076684,0.0029522285,0.0020122512,0.0005824562,0.000529794,0.000054277996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035459916,0.00043641272,0.00010239584,0.00031198488,0.0011746661,0.002588767,0.0004935091,0.0015088894,0.00008309784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00148752,0.0019052714,0.5446654,0.014020727,0.0005452845,0.0014828304,0.010341959,0.00010589209,0.0020771532,0.24194126,0.032640994,0.14878574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011639046,0.00005213491,0.5375296,0.00011442452,0.00025252876,0.000022914921,0.008162429,0.00034823627,0.000028692062,0.14440127,0.3068086,0.0011152783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011800503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005000871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2741676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002084045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002271112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769567087","doi":"10.1017/beq.2017.32","title":"Ethical Responsibility - An Arendtian Turn","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Ethical leadership; Politics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political action; Ethical responsibility; Political science; Public relations; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16757539461421853,"score_gpt":0.4460619657680579,"score_spread":0.27848657115383935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769567087","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30988258,0.000044991782,0.0016988611,0.5259672,0.0029352098,0.00059684407,0.000113831375,0.0006128196,0.15814765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937582,0.00000752104,0.00055287895,0.0034157415,0.0016749275,0.000020071264,0.000014847742,0.000034607576,0.00052121613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994666,0.002028229,0.00043525282,0.00069742306,0.0013044971,0.0008686035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947389,0.0011683251,0.00023664607,0.0019059023,0.0012351031,0.0007151676],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006888904,0.00025889842,0.00035489132,0.00011507286,0.0042552818,0.0011006026,0.001633833,0.0015997738,0.00027002758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013570957,0.00025740464,0.0001171678,0.00022146966,0.0034428658,0.001050906,0.00008218566,0.0028483341,0.00033265256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096607066,0.0001710286,0.0009326229,0.000050085255,0.000013725984,0.00005600292,0.042069785,8.418695e-7,0.0001498613,0.9490364,0.00025638376,0.007166629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048402481,0.00021776678,0.12297666,0.000088959154,0.000030858195,0.0000039758884,0.0027830917,0.000032794804,0.00003782636,0.8292026,0.043570597,0.00057082466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0141581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024797922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6838756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014328153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015449664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894398541","doi":"10.1017/beq.2018.31","title":"The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism, by Arun Sundararajan. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016. 256 pp. ISBN: 978-0262034579","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Sharing Economy and Platforms","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Sharing economy; Sociology; Political economy; Economic history; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02401943558047088,"score_gpt":0.2345859969927301,"score_spread":0.21056656141225924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894398541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88102144,0.016033733,0.0022791568,0.056975182,0.0027057047,0.0028085634,0.00018754725,0.00022688764,0.037761793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957823,0.00018145671,0.000038999344,0.0021135446,0.00081521296,0.00009639671,0.00003612748,0.000052730553,0.00088322005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980116,0.000050174684,0.0007599687,0.00044965002,0.0002870637,0.00044156515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965763,0.00095109333,0.00083303236,0.0009413414,0.000673473,0.000024744124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027047812,0.00035269393,0.00044798158,0.00007653486,0.0009392922,0.00085692026,0.0010397248,0.000234867,0.000058697657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001770257,0.00019347094,0.00014303357,0.00029442404,0.0020828664,0.000950882,0.00018569743,0.00052959955,0.00004032986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024549188,0.0005188265,0.0147570055,0.002794497,0.0010678453,0.00001250485,0.0063790046,0.0002543816,0.00026896264,0.7861127,0.16368903,0.0216903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00626418,0.00016720944,0.026795417,0.0006237455,0.0006050865,0.000010369832,0.00185134,0.017956404,0.0008021165,0.0548198,0.88898236,0.0011219505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010504596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012527072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7312929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027914815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016668238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972845345","doi":"10.1017/beq.2019.19","title":"Big Data and Personalized Pricing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Big data; Reservation; Point (geometry); Economics; Microeconomics; Welfare; Public economics; Business; Market economy; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.39761866616654307,"score_gpt":0.4326414813813234,"score_spread":0.035022815214780345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972845345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98489726,0.0001806061,0.007078778,0.003932938,0.0020285165,0.00016866,0.0000546735,0.000052795884,0.0016057643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99660844,0.00002377528,0.0013684569,0.000667275,0.00019155654,0.0000024244166,0.000021278882,0.00002113174,0.001095651],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969414,0.00019256087,0.0006300086,0.00092825486,0.0010406788,0.0002670904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942123,0.0029127798,0.00028306898,0.0018461527,0.00063584547,0.000109837034],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057379436,0.00018690033,0.0004032553,0.00025976353,0.00020043457,0.0008952395,0.0014495123,0.00025728316,0.00023634643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019452097,0.0001411343,0.000046491296,0.0006832846,0.00018978647,0.0006841674,0.00027039688,0.0004925057,0.0011431695],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004031314,0.000041534942,0.006718262,0.000014813831,0.0000068617082,0.000011161627,0.0033427943,0.000008277908,0.0005381855,0.0013046913,0.0011533835,0.98681974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036352582,0.00050984044,0.10993752,0.00044477012,0.00010705875,0.0002428446,0.019086748,0.018290838,0.000035613437,0.35533392,0.4906619,0.0017137101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014898898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013469037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022079626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025724317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115803351","doi":"10.1017/beq.2020.42","title":"Where MLM Intersects MFA: Morally Suspect Goods and the Grounds for Regulatory Action","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Normative; Economics; Action (physics); Business ethics; Law and economics; Market failure; Preference; Microeconomics; Pareto principle; Positive economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.32771208128415036,"score_gpt":0.42387120100874937,"score_spread":0.09615911972459901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115803351","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2755133,0.0014517971,0.11957417,0.5954983,0.005226981,0.0011439245,0.000024234772,0.00020244501,0.0013648587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924753,0.00017079539,0.0012117883,0.004583376,0.0010128763,0.00008114658,0.0000115217335,0.000034882763,0.0004183209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965055,0.0005150267,0.00070561474,0.00070247776,0.0012599675,0.0003114439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98935014,0.0072744573,0.00043880573,0.0006736826,0.002121768,0.00014112121],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068979086,0.00025555538,0.00041604062,0.00013700924,0.00073924824,0.0010712394,0.0007492406,0.00043499214,0.000070158036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007076351,0.00016625972,0.00012982545,0.0011220492,0.0008174988,0.0008219487,0.00007207709,0.00092374254,0.000039629154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017943889,0.00014704355,0.0015680605,0.0010677645,0.00011101084,0.000007293337,0.13193911,0.00016768636,0.0019447212,0.74446625,0.03454416,0.08224253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046001114,0.00052314776,0.09643079,0.00034534596,0.00015105653,0.000047679365,0.054901533,0.0074187154,0.00011216915,0.78619754,0.04838029,0.0008915947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023503214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012609249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.716962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052890762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056100596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125915223","doi":"10.5840/beq20122215","title":"The Case for Leverage-Based Corporate Human Rights Responsibility","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Leverage (statistics); Harm; Human rights; Nothing; Business; Law and economics; Social responsibility; Business ethics; Moral responsibility; Public relations; Political science; Law; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11716243957048268,"score_gpt":0.2974885088872709,"score_spread":0.18032606931678824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125915223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98683256,0.00009453294,0.004731685,0.003666488,0.0016733661,0.000963917,0.000018590988,0.00029612676,0.0017227224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946946,2.8353102e-7,0.00019051526,0.0010210524,0.0026172101,0.0001212968,0.00010153785,0.0000520952,0.001201442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978353,0.00010194046,0.0005603393,0.00042556945,0.0003602243,0.00071663025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99616224,0.0008773918,0.000643855,0.0008381993,0.0014312699,0.000047056197],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033788644,0.000362399,0.00030725033,0.0001756549,0.0043517365,0.0009467637,0.00041846748,0.0002841182,0.00009803968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007260547,0.00024411318,0.00015459198,0.00051250955,0.00038363258,0.001390309,0.00004415636,0.00052137126,0.00020174851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028154868,0.00021852937,0.0007973273,0.00035554537,0.000026898395,0.0001358912,0.0003170786,0.000009786459,0.00016945139,0.9929948,0.003616583,0.0010765743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00160252,0.000056556983,0.015225011,0.00006813915,0.00014345531,0.000048320897,0.00015051098,0.0008071175,0.00005239895,0.7907893,0.19036375,0.0006929354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019489082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016863637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20220551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005455527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011092094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157556330","doi":"10.1017/beq.2021.6","title":"The Promise of Pragmatism: Richard Rorty and Business Ethics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Epistemology; Business ethics; Deliberation; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Politics; Relevance (law); Democracy; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.22488179301295924,"score_gpt":0.41396868849019075,"score_spread":0.1890868954772315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157556330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45430803,0.009279478,0.06362681,0.4541409,0.010489867,0.0010768896,0.000096694246,0.00019087043,0.00679045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886627,0.0028651624,0.0041613146,0.0014351499,0.0004212913,0.00007111675,0.000032565105,0.000054611693,0.0022960592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99267715,0.0014394935,0.0014272606,0.00085200224,0.003133274,0.0004708218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9544798,0.023699526,0.0009289867,0.0017035545,0.019027928,0.00016021797],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017441109,0.0003274217,0.0005691063,0.0002078334,0.001417764,0.0011066837,0.0009985905,0.00091341947,0.00009621041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056112003,0.00021751173,0.00009807186,0.003573053,0.001209418,0.0007074869,0.00019025123,0.0021826937,0.000054913857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002363452,0.000750508,0.010702301,0.0019627914,0.00016250164,0.00008042852,0.11474828,0.00025404952,0.003908246,0.62410855,0.009262246,0.23382373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008367046,0.000076565535,0.33603904,0.0006341246,0.00009012237,0.00014755789,0.016390814,0.0005074212,0.00047566928,0.59429336,0.049855262,0.0006533712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041318467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021224224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5343547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004041962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040797475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184573451","doi":"10.1017/beq.2021.16","title":"When Managers Become Robin Hoods: A Mixed Method Investigation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Interpersonal communication; Distributive justice; Social psychology; Economic Justice; Identity (music); Psychology; Procedural justice; Organizational justice; Sociology; Law; Political science; Organizational commitment","score_opus":0.2723174634214356,"score_gpt":0.4270731996528874,"score_spread":0.15475573623145183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184573451","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12580739,0.0006004678,0.59892833,0.25946474,0.0096164,0.00039656108,0.000033627133,0.00027270068,0.004879784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8094436,0.00012264008,0.17060395,0.008948564,0.0009926409,0.00011920818,0.00022316142,0.00010307921,0.009443144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929006,0.0018581279,0.0011634358,0.0011130339,0.002488983,0.00047581646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98282975,0.008467758,0.0005693744,0.0015947993,0.0063067325,0.00023159718],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013123674,0.00032803777,0.0005220729,0.00050547527,0.0006092068,0.0013803473,0.0009824003,0.00070926687,0.0006208776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016444333,0.0002926847,0.00016095644,0.0031462782,0.00031822614,0.0011141658,0.00011343345,0.0012926704,0.00053736975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008467029,0.00052940054,0.0077167233,0.0007140291,0.00017728223,0.00018809864,0.12474947,0.0017778074,0.01265337,0.53200674,0.04941443,0.26998794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004735383,0.00003705132,0.078442805,0.000189147,0.00005253588,0.00005589699,0.011797732,0.0012217377,0.00090554927,0.8881092,0.01819159,0.000523235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057608297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001329954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68363625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106160376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019420746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189164128","doi":"10.1017/beq.2021.19","title":"Evidence of an Inverted U–Shaped Relationship between Stakeholder Management Performance Variation and Firm Performance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; University of Regina; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Stakeholder theory; Assertion; Stakeholder management; Variation (astronomy); Business; Sample (material); Stakeholder analysis; Empirical evidence; Economics; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.21649195903634885,"score_gpt":0.31352422100796207,"score_spread":0.09703226197161322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189164128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99583167,0.0000929565,0.0015218987,0.0013143307,0.00019957677,0.00031650328,0.0000019087538,0.00010467005,0.00061647774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982448,0.00003573141,0.0008233168,0.00027567512,0.00029600254,0.000020549569,0.00006219072,0.000031168893,0.00021055392],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768186,0.00010094669,0.00075796887,0.0004967862,0.00068194524,0.00028051584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965645,0.0005895602,0.0007365012,0.0005069719,0.001575889,0.000026564398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002536186,0.00021954003,0.00031433877,0.00024218358,0.00044264566,0.0002970236,0.0002018469,0.00023366333,0.000036977144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014551794,0.00024000328,0.000041502284,0.0016251386,0.00013594527,0.003194693,0.00010874851,0.00046342288,0.000022078604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013793132,0.00010483625,0.92100513,0.0050309342,0.000045475066,0.000025347226,0.0026794185,0.00008178113,0.00089523545,0.004811968,0.000014781191,0.06516714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003824131,0.00003725615,0.9865261,0.0006937275,0.00012497485,0.000003683824,0.0006663114,0.0077368785,0.000030744122,0.003415265,0.00011726542,0.00026542955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027846397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021338687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0655209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053920296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021810102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9787049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215000332","doi":"10.1017/beq.2021.36","title":"Tackling Grand Challenges beyond Dyads and Networks: Developing a Stakeholder Systems View Using the Metaphor of Ballet","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Stakeholder; Metaphor; Stakeholder theory; Ballet; Stakeholder analysis; Focus (optics); Grand Challenges; Complex adaptive system; Knowledge management; Generative grammar; Dance; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Public relations; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.11072036533637705,"score_gpt":0.26662619692250794,"score_spread":0.1559058315861309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215000332","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2205741,0.34048432,0.3471626,0.06962097,0.0063524847,0.0026026699,0.00002032141,0.00049783447,0.012684708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913453,0.0049002715,0.0009413096,0.0015759456,0.0010004101,0.000021615531,0.000036160152,0.000057292036,0.0001217319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832684,0.000071256094,0.0004800541,0.00036437906,0.0004702153,0.00028725507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977267,0.00028722401,0.00033982555,0.0002621991,0.0013732009,0.000010864185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011780919,0.00026035734,0.0004232794,0.00013307853,0.0006153776,0.0004807848,0.00021997445,0.00013797582,0.000023710367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002034367,0.00019916556,0.000049405622,0.0010108078,0.0001506483,0.00060124235,0.00018224439,0.00025971085,0.000004126358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040995652,0.00012164319,0.003706622,0.009226662,0.0007609256,0.00005972686,0.003546994,0.003667898,0.0002036215,0.9675346,0.00091864524,0.010211677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0076314174,0.00011097984,0.16340467,0.009612247,0.004590426,0.00014440728,0.0881614,0.11473016,0.00009312317,0.08476769,0.5210446,0.005708879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020387387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042327895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8827669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019008741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070514274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8121736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231946439","doi":"10.1017/s1052150x00013014","title":"Business Ethics Quarterly: Business Ethics and the Theory of the Firm","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Business; Philosophy of business; Information ethics; Public relations; Content (measure theory); Business administration; Marketing; Political science; Business model; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.26367693775295953,"score_gpt":0.3933365559904039,"score_spread":0.12965961823744437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231946439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50454867,0.0032903838,0.060662936,0.4125654,0.013179477,0.0018854471,0.00012357545,0.00026159937,0.003482534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885871,0.0015900887,0.0007305699,0.0060801464,0.0008787405,0.00011533523,0.000024838128,0.00011596496,0.0018772088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97901416,0.008734374,0.002732095,0.001625261,0.006864613,0.0010295095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.882095,0.08610371,0.0022739621,0.0043437644,0.024916226,0.0002673468],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.052955132,0.0008871649,0.001387254,0.0005660572,0.00514378,0.00088718627,0.0039285445,0.0027776028,0.00017963038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07625015,0.00049907947,0.00035948894,0.008230697,0.010504346,0.001276157,0.00036622473,0.009707141,0.00011141531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009448529,0.00059739075,0.0071125426,0.0012320346,0.00016373835,0.000029123878,0.40026727,0.0005076725,0.0003971921,0.5662469,0.0029267138,0.019574556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002307276,0.00009487582,0.4490262,0.0007859847,0.00017909097,0.00030446536,0.026023243,0.0003036291,0.000050338036,0.51048774,0.009550539,0.00088665605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025720187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00223445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48403847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100949204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006670008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234697074","doi":"10.1017/s1052150x00008526","title":"BEQ volume 19 issue 2 Cover and Front matter","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta; Washington State University; Loyola University Chicago; University of Minnesota; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Computer science; Political science; Mathematics; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.04150745447443899,"score_gpt":0.2314931823076309,"score_spread":0.18998572783319193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234697074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053747114,0.0041671586,0.005258273,0.0531548,0.006297961,0.00046940206,0.0006659383,0.00014299103,0.87609637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4152814,0.00025659095,0.0007191813,0.0097318925,0.00036271365,0.000011958086,0.00002465078,0.000024584484,0.57358706],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998692,0.000012965123,0.00042385678,0.00051617593,0.000045781046,0.00030923454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992737,0.000048866368,0.00018808742,0.00032167,0.00007376605,0.00009387364],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006504569,0.00017718702,0.0003777079,0.00015278302,0.00023680524,0.00023756715,0.00018589474,0.00018208075,0.020179734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060487164,0.00019937617,0.000057898884,0.00012662174,0.00016489455,0.00037222396,0.000028167966,0.00024249841,0.12703267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024313731,0.00009504998,0.010699571,0.00007083186,0.000055628745,0.000009344827,0.010951454,0.000037678103,0.000005327436,0.03081595,0.9447587,0.0024761462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000455979,0.000059574664,0.09749208,0.000016131573,0.000008263167,0.000005659118,0.0005678061,0.00037670924,0.0000010252797,0.014345077,0.88635015,0.0003215716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003904292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009902509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36153427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049762355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024154433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98071593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247286483","doi":"10.1017/s1052150x00010630","title":"BEQ volume 15 issue 3 Cover and Front matter","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Santa Clara University; University of Northern British Columbia; University of Notre Dame; Loyola University Chicago; Yeshiva University; DePaul University; Fairfield University; University of Minnesota; Franklin and Marshall College; University of St. Thomas; Carnegie Mellon University; Northwestern University; University of Northern Iowa; Harvard University; University of Cambridge; Boston College; Wake Forest University; City University of New York; University of Washington","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Computer science; Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.04036648851952197,"score_gpt":0.226726750709076,"score_spread":0.18636026218955404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247286483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077603705,0.0050912327,0.0055602877,0.049984194,0.006547652,0.00046251286,0.0008570897,0.00014612744,0.8537472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30894065,0.00021488937,0.0011763363,0.00485531,0.0006039714,0.000021983695,0.000018869967,0.000034707627,0.6841333],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865687,0.00001270292,0.00045292405,0.0005144048,0.000046878267,0.00031622345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926865,0.000055982735,0.00019130044,0.0003205928,0.00008437163,0.00007910295],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067876,0.00017814303,0.0003663344,0.00014701393,0.00022194981,0.00022749917,0.00018788855,0.00018421457,0.046663947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000453622,0.00020193485,0.000057325724,0.00010842704,0.00021558638,0.00048659995,0.00005238758,0.0002505331,0.28704935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018193248,0.00008692434,0.018360693,0.000090936686,0.00008112047,0.0000037320435,0.012245891,0.000068396264,0.0000045929633,0.014456292,0.951345,0.0032382153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040867468,0.000023104061,0.036708802,0.000014291404,0.00000762842,0.0000041858025,0.00054252526,0.00074463617,0.0000017920265,0.0021373667,0.9591234,0.00028361587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038762207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004272077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2403854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059241363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021957021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95420754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296616755","doi":"10.1017/beq.2022.20","title":"The Role of Deliberative Mini-Publics in Improving the Deliberative Capacity of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Victoria","funders":"University of Victoria","keywords":"Conceptualization; Publics; Corporate governance; Political science; Stakeholder; Public relations; Deliberative democracy; Polity; Civil society; Sociology; Public administration; Management; Economics; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1043048008649893,"score_gpt":0.2872697813252834,"score_spread":0.1829649804602941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296616755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937678,0.00022149885,0.0007303163,0.0028342742,0.0003112999,0.0007498237,0.000025404572,0.000041843112,0.001317763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989531,0.0000047008807,0.00022842677,0.00043598248,0.00013833685,0.00013155998,0.000017664568,0.00003432524,0.000055885073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968318,0.0004756169,0.0011025106,0.00037738308,0.0008426334,0.00037008937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933895,0.0019537818,0.0017947186,0.00050307234,0.0023462812,0.000012684605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005470565,0.00024805166,0.00038723488,0.00022562181,0.0011492757,0.00023777026,0.00058160926,0.00012889114,0.000030008468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040238546,0.00017986051,0.00011744146,0.0020304834,0.00063647446,0.0010613932,0.00029341807,0.001175082,0.0000021939961],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014105234,0.0020098726,0.0983354,0.0012149358,0.000394806,0.00005486594,0.2847972,0.0033475647,0.049911983,0.35421282,0.00013275153,0.20417729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00272755,0.00022309728,0.4246859,0.00019825941,0.00017464087,0.000011766474,0.426736,0.037126094,0.0017981286,0.09919011,0.005955095,0.0011733641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049970862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008084787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32635048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010150629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006050055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88394153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385234012","doi":"10.1017/beq.2023.15","title":"Ethics for Capitalists: A Systematic Approach to Business Ethics, Competition, and Market Failure, by Joseph Heath. Altona, MB: FriesenPress, 2023. 276 pp.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Competition (biology); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Economics; Political science; Management; Philosophy; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.061118347589709486,"score_gpt":0.25910540635670765,"score_spread":0.19798705876699815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385234012","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06342094,0.040822793,0.45806012,0.27218577,0.024547787,0.027848037,0.030077808,0.003091876,0.07994488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97406024,0.0037277564,0.0030139482,0.007082833,0.002006661,0.0029060226,0.0022210297,0.00048625199,0.0044952505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943159,0.000400134,0.0023619237,0.001539773,0.00033178218,0.0010504387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930691,0.0029811396,0.0010236951,0.0011048926,0.0014298261,0.00039134265],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010249115,0.0006386159,0.0019473152,0.0005038949,0.0011703244,0.0009896418,0.00081859156,0.0018288163,0.000076619595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036902297,0.00082308176,0.00022254304,0.0014750483,0.0006496885,0.0007230219,0.0001423935,0.0017285878,0.000428578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010064458,0.00025586537,0.00087084563,0.03826028,0.00032305098,0.000008290111,0.02447347,0.00016378767,0.00003312412,0.82310474,0.11236607,0.00003981135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006989115,0.00070530095,0.014437483,0.0097003905,0.0003359329,0.0001430285,0.027519112,0.01525058,0.000025046722,0.5945831,0.32397974,0.0063311644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074319327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026904463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9106393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028148692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004156572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387675067","doi":"10.1017/beq.2023.25","title":"<i>Business Ethics Quarterly</i> Special Issue on: Normativity in Business Ethics and Beyond","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Mathematics; Engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.22012267116881468,"score_gpt":0.4166890507853692,"score_spread":0.19656637961655454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387675067","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.367609,0.00033939382,0.008982181,0.57312685,0.027388029,0.0017906989,0.00031617683,0.00084871205,0.019598966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96530306,0.0020287938,0.0013766744,0.014544095,0.012658418,0.00026772695,0.00037490966,0.00029487233,0.0031514545],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819025,0.0041182153,0.0028315333,0.002449814,0.0070608193,0.0016371493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93933094,0.043990426,0.0012291076,0.002606142,0.012369343,0.00047405597],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.043236412,0.0011683048,0.0016072283,0.0025241352,0.0024952556,0.0025004346,0.0022893022,0.0039711683,0.00047388652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043855406,0.0010482034,0.00019736675,0.017918421,0.001979202,0.0026402087,0.00029465958,0.011793861,0.002231304],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009590454,0.0019183569,0.007624101,0.00371626,0.00012050917,0.000532274,0.5306258,0.0028251763,0.00065898884,0.16340894,0.058013503,0.229597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026653737,0.00040830454,0.5188249,0.0014989094,0.00008708526,0.00011526437,0.045350265,0.0013040104,0.000058105543,0.29142016,0.13575062,0.0025170438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021749495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013175598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59769404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024309145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045817927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391814583","doi":"10.1017/beq.2023.37","title":"The Virtue of External Goods in Action Sports Practice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Action (physics); Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05866104984532122,"score_gpt":0.3914090032715373,"score_spread":0.3327479534262161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391814583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6242191,0.008327199,0.22632805,0.05063043,0.030440694,0.0010779048,0.000019170277,0.00043072389,0.05852671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980506,0.00006319098,0.00018276206,0.00027154828,0.0002994214,0.000012808418,0.000004492778,0.000021574744,0.0010936295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998629,0.00017655843,0.0004119864,0.00023614967,0.00037911028,0.00016721599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984058,0.0008995213,0.0001724756,0.00028515232,0.00021015223,0.000026910346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016734429,0.00011001184,0.00013488378,0.000118797085,0.00009594193,0.00008145852,0.00011366521,0.00022647256,0.000114751754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013577486,0.000080543374,0.00004767138,0.00044123852,0.0000965327,0.00025998434,0.0000072580183,0.00075429195,0.00002801135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027522168,0.00018022717,0.0012350946,0.0001551215,0.000050110848,0.0005509529,0.04807638,0.000057287125,0.0013859398,0.6028833,0.00039058342,0.34475982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000972984,0.00030838794,0.5196908,0.0011126221,0.00014370546,0.0006618081,0.04859555,0.0009564496,0.00008681174,0.03487637,0.3919799,0.00061459927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007281944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028422894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56800693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002875204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011848844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32844636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402806900","doi":"10.1017/beq.2024.10","title":"Human-Centered AI, by Ben Shneiderman. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. 305 pp.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Media studies","score_opus":0.05914274948877702,"score_gpt":0.3498394482004286,"score_spread":0.2906966987116516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402806900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105448395,0.007578986,0.004911933,0.50920796,0.008445432,0.0020946932,0.0011108705,0.002605761,0.35859594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96371955,0.0044961376,0.00009961976,0.0028939694,0.0010756043,0.0000072256425,0.00016297077,0.00007773789,0.027467163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680173,0.0005590347,0.0003343005,0.00054661836,0.0010440741,0.000714259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773335,0.0005101117,0.00011812533,0.00035358118,0.0009865789,0.00029823332],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020056756,0.00028694494,0.00032397668,0.00010322799,0.0020139178,0.0011603092,0.0007730058,0.0009965166,0.00021103554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003168293,0.00031303204,0.00017156044,0.00075423165,0.00087035383,0.0016467478,0.00007568595,0.0019493412,0.000025781717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002865937,0.00018496299,0.00017054005,0.0003859386,0.00014134888,0.00013757816,0.07894161,0.000005292938,0.00038275865,0.7362078,0.17702836,0.006385133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033206397,0.00009356454,0.0007241265,0.00022067159,0.00006695031,0.0000014768101,0.009017822,0.000072662355,0.000013071538,0.021321647,0.96770716,0.00042880807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014991835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008415953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8582712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002533348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010736673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410327501","doi":"10.1017/beq.2025.3","title":"The Normative Core of Relational Stakeholder Strategies: Explaining Open Buyer-Supplier Relations in the Context of the Amazon Rainforest","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Innovation and Socioeconomic Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Amazon rainforest; Normative; Core (optical fiber); Context (archaeology); Stakeholder; Business; Rainforest; Environmental resource management; Economics; Political science; Geography; Public relations; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.10149964427592977,"score_gpt":0.3016273224814843,"score_spread":0.2001276782055545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410327501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6319413,0.000056836347,0.004766236,0.09081632,0.001581931,0.0023261912,0.000028662635,0.00003562563,0.26844686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953773,0.0000031452355,0.00009060431,0.0036056503,0.000053839954,0.00007492389,0.000045500215,0.000008192022,0.0007408401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986308,0.0000594456,0.0007191179,0.00013911471,0.00029350954,0.00015801787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973285,0.00092331663,0.00058413646,0.00032338037,0.00083758525,0.0000030521273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025486671,0.00013174037,0.00018191793,0.00013606508,0.0006694467,0.00035170303,0.0007779054,0.00013474221,0.00006473639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003189366,0.000076566816,0.00004414041,0.0009982466,0.00031080886,0.00096323364,0.0001123238,0.00050866994,0.000016680786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028466087,0.00003163771,0.009822383,0.00006682319,0.000027977136,2.4913214e-7,0.019086227,0.00023576593,0.000009484131,0.9659356,0.0030764695,0.001678912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013698328,0.000009260971,0.6322317,0.00032217798,0.000028506576,6.05789e-7,0.20704505,0.0015688047,0.0000053903887,0.09295291,0.06427472,0.00019102593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000701985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00229944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8729827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049775863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059563684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.514891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415570594","doi":"10.1017/beq.2025.10085","title":"The Danger of Contextual Integrity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Yale University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Adversarial system; Sociality; Data integrity; Contextual design; Context analysis; Personal Integrity","score_opus":0.057513871347640806,"score_gpt":0.3485667971884821,"score_spread":0.2910529258408413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415570594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056973748,0.0034903134,0.31405038,0.21891291,0.013566672,0.0014724591,0.000058281843,0.00043602983,0.3910392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886673,0.00017199782,0.00008169076,0.00050248514,0.00025023601,0.0000133908015,0.0000027675585,0.0000058575306,0.010304284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985395,0.0003870792,0.0002570732,0.00015763036,0.0004157389,0.00024295294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711114,0.0015300263,0.00009820889,0.00027995987,0.00093887805,0.00004177077],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022285527,0.000088559245,0.00016544937,0.00004488178,0.0009923897,0.00012284938,0.0004894578,0.00030485188,0.00003487586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078377686,0.000057567868,0.00006446054,0.0005092339,0.013477573,0.000150522,0.000017745351,0.00055879855,0.000017960456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016411703,0.000032433996,0.0001820402,0.000023218256,0.000017085607,9.92401e-7,0.028431788,1.7936884e-7,0.0000399691,0.94648725,0.00214538,0.022623228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047938048,0.000057717334,0.0031357282,0.00013253902,0.00003749234,4.174525e-7,0.029920137,0.000022993696,0.00006035342,0.32890713,0.6370622,0.0001839447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034953984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012554096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93169355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039003822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082701206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98920715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416456021","doi":"10.1017/beq.2025.10096","title":"Zones of Slow Death? Social Descent, Epistemic Injustice and Temporality","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Framing (construction); Ethnography; Injustice; Social injustice; Social justice; Erasure","score_opus":0.09202905428730836,"score_gpt":0.3881972112763369,"score_spread":0.29616815698902854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416456021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7085805,0.0040774466,0.010176276,0.17746654,0.0030801673,0.0008624196,0.00006631093,0.0002775866,0.095412746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99715596,0.00015431075,0.00029925542,0.0004326037,0.00011241846,0.000013333219,0.0000039500483,0.0000057379566,0.001822441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983282,0.00055221573,0.000333185,0.00026559806,0.00025930675,0.00026151363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983274,0.0007691812,0.00015795616,0.00014413087,0.0005622138,0.000039114886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017849947,0.00013491389,0.00031775597,0.00008659898,0.0012181668,0.00004178232,0.00020491808,0.00041325213,0.00000802764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005874361,0.00013581553,0.000050194896,0.00046255699,0.0013560534,0.00011607786,0.000040153227,0.00035918906,0.0000041069675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008538219,0.00012317226,0.056502912,0.0010683906,0.00009674378,0.000007536397,0.14970072,3.4838288e-7,0.00007539528,0.7842845,0.0012672785,0.0067876657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007607184,0.00009700223,0.72534144,0.00027119493,0.00021022173,0.0000030602798,0.08263715,0.00000724852,0.000032982272,0.17959265,0.010667249,0.0003790517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005088491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004309353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66883856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041751016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005281165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9369277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}