{"meta":{"query_hash":"53408bc7598d","filters":{"venue":"California Agriculture"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/53408bc7598d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=California+Agriculture"},"results":[{"id":"W2108909842","doi":"10.3733/ca.v066n01p15","title":"UC Cooperative Extension explores a farm-to-WIC program","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"California Agriculture","topic":"Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis; University of California, Davis; California Department of Food and Agriculture","keywords":"Voucher; Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; Consumption (sociology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Cash; Business; Cash crop; Agricultural economics; Agricultural science; Environmental health; Geography; Agriculture; Economics; Medicine; Finance; Food security; Food insecurity; Biology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0204333842213927,"score_gpt":0.27909514333648805,"score_spread":0.25866175911509537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108909842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935206,0.00031952633,0.00005057286,0.0017187495,0.00023783879,0.0015063765,0.000066158005,0.0003810191,0.002199162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949864,0.000016725278,0.0007945302,0.0012677761,0.0013563178,0.00027971662,0.00019214534,0.00003138498,0.0010750061],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983011,0.00007333475,0.00020962767,0.00038261176,0.00041809902,0.00061522203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985671,0.00005260404,0.000064107386,0.00030381136,0.00032150093,0.0006908805],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011230173,0.0003244113,0.00045869438,0.000050615785,0.00015040406,0.000041408435,0.00011524453,0.00018860395,0.0000917927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017712972,0.00018229467,0.00016843808,0.00052773603,0.00006731992,0.00015643162,0.0001389736,0.00042153022,0.0017231884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047758626,0.068077765,0.28727657,0.0006708885,0.0006231592,0.00018638415,0.005196583,0.000071520524,0.3415021,0.0046589323,0.2550716,0.036186893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009369994,0.00086749106,0.6715081,0.0001840977,0.0002344371,0.00010427947,0.0006773772,0.00004361689,0.029729128,0.000081685386,0.29513523,0.00049761037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014708171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030006799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38423148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012047841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028187673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137697655","doi":"10.3733/ca.v067n03p147","title":"Fumigant emission reductions with TIF warrant regulatory changes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"California Agriculture","topic":"Plant Disease Management Techniques","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chloropicrin; Environmental science; Ozone; Environmental chemistry; Bromide; Air monitoring; Montreal Protocol; Chemistry; Fumigation; Environmental engineering; Ozone layer; Agronomy","score_opus":0.0067899078246630076,"score_gpt":0.16384081348057183,"score_spread":0.15705090565590882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137697655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98686993,0.00020022005,0.000007515396,0.009080317,0.0000611258,0.0006813728,0.00021864245,0.0005917725,0.002289093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99433416,0.000096761134,0.00021164492,0.00064353686,0.00044554603,0.00024106466,0.0006717311,0.0000021824876,0.0033533804],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988626,0.000042145264,0.00013798395,0.00035595451,0.0002781489,0.00032316937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947935,0.0000252006,0.000084959705,0.00009254519,0.0001087392,0.00020917311],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006971078,0.00021826853,0.00016962147,0.00001490394,0.00027054947,0.00010150676,0.0002481184,0.00012818965,0.0009513074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012510863,0.00005840078,0.000062122905,0.00035329183,0.000055672423,0.00013427933,0.000071256,0.00014362062,0.00027083873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010840754,0.00007563959,0.0011666002,0.000013907712,0.00002161284,0.000009264182,0.000029887773,0.000001476286,0.676127,0.00007300762,0.3109444,0.011526336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001819184,0.0002716767,0.20000356,0.00019013364,0.00009180673,0.00008337772,0.0011913226,0.000034028795,0.06147201,0.00064143527,0.73509896,0.0007397793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000121302255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015915882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.614655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038293612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000049560335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169867769","doi":"10.3733/ca.e.v067n03p181","title":"Preplant 1,3-D treatments test well for perennial crop nurseries, but challenges remain","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"California Agriculture","topic":"Plant Disease Management Techniques","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cooke Aquaculture (Canada)","funders":"Agricultural Research Service; University of California, Davis; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Perennial plant; Fumigation; Environmental science; Orchard; Sowing; Vineyard; Agroforestry; Agronomy; Crop; Weed control; Integrated pest management; Agricultural engineering; Engineering; Biology; Horticulture","score_opus":0.015992473967397197,"score_gpt":0.19989758373197244,"score_spread":0.18390510976457525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169867769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766381,0.0010013317,0.000013743008,0.005231095,0.00015098011,0.0028940935,0.0069136266,0.0008052703,0.00635179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97962767,0.0019973486,0.000814474,0.0005596636,0.0011356057,0.0018297248,0.0039792727,0.0000068271484,0.0100494],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842703,0.00006105391,0.00025814428,0.0005341372,0.0002281598,0.00049146364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916565,0.0002278593,0.0001593372,0.00011202539,0.00012249534,0.00021263576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011040653,0.00033345207,0.00027709713,0.00001347954,0.00032205298,0.00015132663,0.00037471537,0.0002021733,0.0005678503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001098332,0.000106536405,0.00017941227,0.00014591514,0.00005123452,0.00017823894,0.00008237904,0.00012275491,0.0005564992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099761426,0.0009856058,0.012690713,0.0001067641,0.00017341385,0.000025774341,0.00012329621,0.0000026141838,0.30458993,0.00045513155,0.61846197,0.06228501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049028295,0.00070406904,0.19677289,0.00009004091,0.00018182817,0.000030401738,0.0008226492,0.00007555936,0.008806063,0.0018808248,0.7894106,0.00073482713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025002228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040865297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29578388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006000966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005667683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71528566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2207761032","doi":"10.3733/ca.v069n04p222","title":"Soil sampling protocol reliably estimates preplant NO3−in SDI tomatoes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"California Agriculture","topic":"Irrigation Practices and Water Management","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Fertilizer; Agronomy; Nutrient; Leaching (pedology); Irrigation; Sowing; Hectare; Geostatistics; Center pivot irrigation; Drip irrigation; San Joaquin; Soil test; Soil water; Mathematics; Spatial variability; Soil science; Agriculture; Ecology","score_opus":0.02513617472839488,"score_gpt":0.24112716241139096,"score_spread":0.21599098768299607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2207761032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97574836,0.000041213818,0.000019994666,0.0031018094,0.00014044502,0.016398266,0.00017912083,0.00031506503,0.004055723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95131874,0.000040277933,0.0017417435,0.0023025589,0.001751012,0.039956544,0.0015106619,0.000013326152,0.0013651487],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979879,0.00009391352,0.00045973322,0.0005209192,0.00043181732,0.0005056691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908704,0.00011232688,0.00021665407,0.0001102272,0.00022597474,0.00024778128],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047054442,0.00031483453,0.0002863285,0.00002147108,0.0002012345,0.00028587278,0.00034246934,0.00019805552,0.0000985236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017918741,0.00010618929,0.00010280019,0.0004241787,0.00003949292,0.00037246145,0.00017339233,0.0002585082,0.0010444575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092552585,0.0018536655,0.054334354,0.0005857102,0.00020890126,0.00024268602,0.0022383188,0.03079796,0.43454316,0.0010402775,0.42709017,0.04613927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010852328,0.00041564667,0.017665884,0.00023944829,0.000053006224,0.00006632707,0.0015765651,0.003996244,0.04420503,0.0018185709,0.9279597,0.00091834407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018732119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020076313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5008695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089673566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017682674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480400500","doi":"10.3733/ca.2016a0006","title":"Inconsistent food safety pressures complicate environmental conservation for California produce growers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"California Agriculture","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; Nature Conservancy","keywords":"Wildlife; Food safety; Audit; Environmental stewardship; Business; Clearing; Vegetation (pathology); Stewardship (theology); Government (linguistics); Agricultural science; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Agroforestry; Geography; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.011477857393245262,"score_gpt":0.17312724593620032,"score_spread":0.16164938854295507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480400500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9072578,0.0009065743,0.000096484044,0.06669744,0.00035274157,0.0023202929,0.021631116,0.0003977154,0.00033985783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955722,0.00010709443,0.00013292345,0.00091180013,0.0008257323,0.00016451984,0.0013251776,0.000004445416,0.0009560805],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978654,0.000083900486,0.0004479342,0.00071955536,0.0003339047,0.0005493285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990582,0.00023459949,0.00023460665,0.00012967752,0.00009651535,0.00024642155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018912245,0.00039923433,0.00035241595,0.0000104978,0.0004967922,0.00007405247,0.00039706187,0.00029085344,0.0003539201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008655524,0.00010595582,0.00026239117,0.00023177017,0.00012291067,0.00015935049,0.00011631111,0.0001471395,0.0002600827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014530082,0.00024792625,0.004001852,0.00002497235,0.000083151775,0.0000018147657,0.000036402682,0.0000014700801,0.88520974,0.00024349365,0.10027067,0.009733209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006337254,0.00061378296,0.075578995,0.00006828848,0.00007232114,0.000045327495,0.00022984894,0.000004513828,0.046607733,0.00031795716,0.8753203,0.0005071984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013656641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020548105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.838602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011636365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011527589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4320753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766410740","doi":"","title":"A quarter century of oak woodland research in the Sierra foothills supports oak restoration - eScholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"California Agriculture","topic":"Seedling growth and survival studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland; Foothills; Geography; Agroforestry; Forestry; Quarter (Canadian coin); Ecology; Biology; Archaeology; Cartography","score_opus":0.019918147870469957,"score_gpt":0.26473780076697706,"score_spread":0.2448196528965071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766410740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904072,0.00009717641,0.0000016805599,0.002163229,0.0001790032,0.00030436378,0.00005291427,0.000014152006,0.006780252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993413,0.000029492456,0.00006595193,0.0002640384,0.00012639735,0.00003286537,0.000058627495,0.0000056259637,0.00007570361],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982832,0.00023404085,0.00022930028,0.00025874862,0.0006389162,0.00035576895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993943,0.00017880964,0.00006315818,0.00024712188,0.00003611041,0.00008048808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014560614,0.00012668993,0.00014485477,0.00003778786,0.00022060514,0.000054896813,0.00032566284,0.000166311,0.00021348425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019252462,0.00006515943,0.000057739588,0.0005761863,0.00020240099,0.00012701523,0.00008637407,0.0007628124,0.00026326455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006312258,0.0003054499,0.7814223,0.000037332444,0.000015718231,0.000036618003,0.0046389024,0.000038372156,0.11982235,0.0006417176,0.09118406,0.0017940514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000249939,0.00007498624,0.78188473,0.000019341725,0.000008061509,0.000014353887,0.0021406496,0.000008007029,0.0009277842,0.0012456949,0.21327366,0.00015276838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037119468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017198686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1220896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046749563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001025952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3383821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766800489","doi":"","title":"INTRODUCTION: Methyl bromide primer and timeline - eScholarship","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"California Agriculture","topic":"Plant responses to elevated CO2","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Montreal Protocol; Ozone layer; Environmental science; Bromide; Horticulture; Environmental chemistry; Chemistry; Biology; Geography; Ozone; Meteorology","score_opus":0.007683069999454909,"score_gpt":0.18273658656463224,"score_spread":0.17505351656517731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766800489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98371345,0.0006365886,0.0000017757766,0.014438871,0.00010125658,0.00031817157,0.00012080765,0.00015393416,0.0005151386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98548007,0.00017884954,0.00056847406,0.0013458243,0.002877843,0.00009106231,0.0008594596,0.0000027529895,0.008595653],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987064,0.00012546543,0.00021637992,0.00040767697,0.00020890118,0.0003351518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993439,0.00014194091,0.000080176134,0.00007170382,0.00014752665,0.0002147578],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018173917,0.00021627858,0.00020448901,0.000011922854,0.00020603897,0.0001756896,0.00020110034,0.00020539797,0.0028315994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001527342,0.000065791755,0.00006690783,0.0003750324,0.000057214536,0.00024537064,0.0000807288,0.00030876554,0.0018544181],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023178804,0.00003074968,0.0009245096,0.0000040064588,0.000019213241,0.000002748304,0.000009249479,0.0000016428017,0.8888374,0.00008205066,0.09145044,0.01861483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014519229,0.00010690701,0.12040744,0.00001133187,0.000030131569,0.00013344928,0.00009087311,0.000017784057,0.03608127,0.000395307,0.8422605,0.00031980718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014586284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000069959984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85275614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028297827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005431155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093626939","doi":"10.3733/ca.2020a0026","title":"California's agritourism operations expand despite facing regulatory challenges","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"California Agriculture","topic":"Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; State (computer science); Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Geography; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.041141043851875725,"score_gpt":0.28126883681798337,"score_spread":0.24012779296610764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093626939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41056225,0.012588406,0.0008229578,0.3891384,0.0010624146,0.0030522686,0.0014244982,0.0019171041,0.17943169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98944026,0.0016854897,0.0008544884,0.0013430932,0.0036820758,0.00006686177,0.00008446927,0.000034956443,0.0028082812],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971357,0.0003067615,0.0002861512,0.0005562836,0.0010088345,0.0007062821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984868,0.000093158436,0.000068484085,0.00024172661,0.0003104298,0.00079940783],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004671006,0.00026020044,0.0003029375,0.00006575898,0.0011884494,0.00032093638,0.00064534036,0.00032359926,0.0006437898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006004424,0.00019672822,0.00017336523,0.00045289713,0.0002647538,0.0003596547,0.00018706782,0.0005245096,0.0021724326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008517237,0.0003848372,0.001980722,0.00024940912,0.00033941638,0.0009035718,0.058874,0.0021195903,0.02551459,0.037113167,0.8543789,0.018056631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005212382,0.0000682294,0.0016240877,0.00005691196,0.00004875794,0.0000047536287,0.027648374,0.000112875765,0.0018981125,0.0005850191,0.9668732,0.00055839936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000493263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010351107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57887805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001607754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020839332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}