{"meta":{"query_hash":"7b1ea8bcc34b","filters":{"venue":"Cambridge International Law Journal"},"cohort_total":10,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"exported":10,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7b1ea8bcc34b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Cambridge+International+Law+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W2520002852","doi":"10.4337/cilj.2016.01.02","title":"Global Public Goods and Democracy in International Legal Scholarship","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge International Law Journal","topic":"Public health and occupational medicine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Globe; Public good; Scholarship; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.034496989860360705,"score_gpt":0.3683178458355461,"score_spread":0.3338208559751854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520002852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008375454,0.041291256,0.011905413,0.18978035,0.0021443297,0.000035364606,0.000117784584,0.00008278042,0.7462673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8377809,0.034331013,0.006759314,0.044838704,0.0111039,0.00025689587,0.00025853302,0.00022536148,0.06444534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898807,0.0055984044,0.00046754518,0.0011060443,0.0017174957,0.0012298771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828069,0.01246582,0.001364902,0.0015029316,0.0010417638,0.0008175748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0136905275,0.0005578322,0.0008081275,0.004453514,0.010511143,0.017692871,0.0020511155,0.009873603,0.014058418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021081014,0.00035392787,0.00077296497,0.0074713174,0.04826644,0.016880756,0.008814561,0.011618413,0.0015326062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.378913e-7,0.0000035850746,0.000020023246,0.000011081355,4.8242475e-7,0.000009061935,0.0007211773,0.000037768365,0.000003134882,0.9962813,0.0018008109,0.0011108941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005076249,0.000005449449,0.00009087813,0.00025140354,0.0000020331029,0.000028380004,0.0010705764,0.00016678026,0.000028360631,0.8961456,0.10219946,0.0000060323528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053913314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033800078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017692871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01333881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00802489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0967803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525907997","doi":"10.4337/cilj.2016.02.06","title":"Federalism and Foreign Affairs in Canada and the European Union: The Search for Equal Autonomy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge International Law Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Sovereignty; European union; Foreign policy; Dual federalism; Constitution; Political science; Sovereign state; Law; International law; Political economy; International trade; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.019228110455084258,"score_gpt":0.2643044147249007,"score_spread":0.24507630426981641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525907997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19581057,0.020233363,0.0041066334,0.09880831,0.0004411438,0.000040791485,0.00013214097,0.000050990282,0.6803762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776978,0.002888983,0.0006930283,0.0030891243,0.00005521469,0.000013091219,0.000031212607,0.000014326046,0.015517216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99500555,0.00088257197,0.00007730921,0.00032579267,0.0011315449,0.0025771826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977457,0.0007378752,0.00018619659,0.00009742424,0.0006015325,0.0006313648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029256218,0.0002593639,0.00049650116,0.0019633109,0.017396811,0.010047269,0.0010970827,0.002847217,0.003303361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067320447,0.00020266225,0.00042072998,0.0033172069,0.022103315,0.003768454,0.0049383766,0.004627978,0.00012274092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011793832,0.0000040429136,0.0009155329,0.000012211407,0.000004774619,0.000056515342,0.0033306791,0.00028082886,0.00002818663,0.98875403,0.0017523858,0.0048490707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006935269,0.000028143464,0.026545113,0.0005639186,0.00008877528,0.00021093876,0.029903792,0.0024901247,0.00049755035,0.5243891,0.41507185,0.00014139868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.985036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98958427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8728465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12715352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16480318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92256767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592457904","doi":"","title":"18th International Conference on Discovery Science, Banff, Canada, October 4-6, 2015","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge International Law Journal","topic":"Web Data Mining and Analysis","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Geography; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03309734621751375,"score_gpt":0.28560021480501946,"score_spread":0.2525028685875057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592457904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006894368,0.07747133,0.07257945,0.08329272,0.061575074,0.00044502434,0.010190377,0.0062495074,0.6813021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022020163,0.019914908,0.013766461,0.0025925438,0.002934208,0.0000868102,0.0057134014,0.0008857955,0.9320858],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650866,0.00041222,0.00009377673,0.0003804474,0.0018814357,0.00072350865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919213,0.00097488926,0.00014299911,0.0011314766,0.0039629424,0.001866486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008083015,0.0012384399,0.0018331611,0.004951788,0.0040251114,0.013491135,0.0028474133,0.002297971,0.1629812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008082762,0.0006334816,0.0010134773,0.0041876114,0.003673303,0.005486612,0.0046664155,0.003284272,0.057551183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000122755,0.000081591344,0.0005605528,0.00019568883,0.000032432297,0.00006941044,0.00015919861,0.00047986585,0.0005936644,0.037865117,0.8452243,0.11461549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013355285,0.000017981065,0.0006613427,0.0001764897,0.00001454666,0.00003779574,0.0001988051,0.0011986486,0.00047808557,0.013291546,0.98389405,0.000017294054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19850132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38418612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19850132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016139224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027815372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54522645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744308588","doi":"10.4337/cilj.2016.01.08","title":"Book Review","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge International Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Computer science; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.024264275700757253,"score_gpt":0.306161533687821,"score_spread":0.2818972579870638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744308588","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005399185,0.4752734,0.0016189602,0.03774416,0.054183763,0.00023786475,0.003380379,0.0004929339,0.42652866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037104809,0.36611488,0.0016763052,0.02508595,0.021083266,0.00018649064,0.004042709,0.0003744454,0.5777256],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998874,0.00015801487,0.00009246279,0.00014355483,0.00063100795,0.000100930745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701643,0.0008442512,0.00019767467,0.00019510505,0.0013709791,0.00037561747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009793838,0.0006653528,0.0011900205,0.003664518,0.0010744213,0.0056861956,0.0020539595,0.0022103093,0.27878648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006802111,0.00036667468,0.0006956115,0.0053271195,0.00082502444,0.003365029,0.0019339059,0.0026855934,0.19778612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015997397,0.000018503548,0.00004792261,0.0009977819,0.00000727111,0.000061678315,0.00005868583,0.000054249078,0.00007441201,0.003950399,0.897738,0.096975155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027538106,0.000005014739,0.00006606959,0.00056928804,0.0000033539816,0.00011282975,0.000028564036,0.0000059388894,0.0000134652255,0.00055525865,0.998635,0.0000024729484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00285248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00481315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27878648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021192844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043646237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9326337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805725767","doi":"10.4337/cilj.2018.01.02","title":"Deconstructing the Convention on the Rights of the Child: semiotics, significs and semioethics of gendercide","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge International Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Convention; Semiotics; Meaning (existential); Terminology; Law; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025316992937138294,"score_gpt":0.29967962282346067,"score_spread":0.2743626298863224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805725767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.113843285,0.011564509,0.09328198,0.045156457,0.0016108997,0.00010430176,0.000084040854,0.00009238562,0.73426217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767791,0.0020209674,0.006254316,0.0014390202,0.00029875184,0.00010232651,0.000023267892,0.00007571032,0.013006585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989027,0.0082453145,0.00022957084,0.00043350869,0.0014349376,0.0006296414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99327517,0.0050144736,0.0004714736,0.00053519866,0.0005013993,0.00020225278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0094882,0.0004646285,0.00048676692,0.0017300673,0.0051459153,0.008276062,0.0010540009,0.0027293738,0.0015333461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010249274,0.00023758158,0.00034424962,0.0009988401,0.071955115,0.0077262437,0.0058340393,0.0044988003,0.00026208762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033834658,0.0000014543753,0.00004864421,0.000011837431,3.3403194e-7,0.000034443125,0.018585661,0.00003257031,0.000062868334,0.9798012,0.00027649172,0.0011411578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009360826,0.000030081346,0.00035088038,0.00034328183,0.0000042036986,0.0003245868,0.04340944,0.00040388628,0.0008686178,0.74936163,0.20486733,0.000026703054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004463233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043620276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0094882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004811604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045588673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050178945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993017311","doi":"10.4337/cilj.2019.02.07","title":"Technology on the margins: AI and global migration management from a human rights perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge International Law Journal","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Accountability; Population; Political science; Law and economics; Democracy; European union; Sociology; Law; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.015094932970811523,"score_gpt":0.3041216022523834,"score_spread":0.28902666928157184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993017311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021852478,0.03657223,0.090640545,0.20566842,0.0017619467,0.000096338066,0.00007959265,0.00020968729,0.64311874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89197457,0.02860561,0.022489704,0.015111095,0.0022822472,0.00023890924,0.00008872894,0.00018193742,0.039027244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701226,0.0018079944,0.00010393637,0.00031281836,0.00042924346,0.00033368485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551904,0.0029853121,0.00035570207,0.00053070975,0.0003258613,0.00028334768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050084656,0.00069169316,0.00040252224,0.0018447161,0.0029423146,0.011019618,0.0013014105,0.005263051,0.007880042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005927444,0.00024705238,0.0005147198,0.0015277504,0.035556078,0.015771417,0.0066077793,0.0045105526,0.0009218117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014478353,0.000018918825,0.0005108594,0.000106020234,0.000011753757,0.00010542557,0.003114749,0.0018676245,0.00022708924,0.96353656,0.0031680656,0.027318396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008122,0.00003759244,0.00041268146,0.0003961311,0.0000091339,0.000132821,0.0042959214,0.001533898,0.00030967212,0.89714664,0.09569793,0.000019427427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037308924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017532796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011019618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039383895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032807165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028575182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108388986","doi":"10.4337/cilj.2020.02.03","title":"Transboundary watercourses, dams and human migration: an international water law perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge International Law Journal","topic":"Transboundary Water Resource Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; International law; Context (archaeology); Duty; Business; International waters; Environmental planning; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Environmental resource management; Geography; Environmental science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02582725135152322,"score_gpt":0.3164952142001556,"score_spread":0.2906679628486324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108388986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017728478,0.041937362,0.018714678,0.21896425,0.0016692469,0.00007615795,0.00010422849,0.00004273398,0.70076287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7890936,0.085112445,0.0111442935,0.057565447,0.0035040579,0.0002992119,0.00014012468,0.000091401314,0.05304944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975902,0.0010610336,0.00010142414,0.00026870403,0.00037186372,0.00060679356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977986,0.001267806,0.00035862433,0.00010245982,0.0002390578,0.00023341828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037391079,0.0007544064,0.0005460066,0.0033439777,0.0046320744,0.009126383,0.0019226053,0.010927768,0.00763004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034789448,0.00030896722,0.0010256314,0.004134164,0.02600193,0.01357932,0.0066233887,0.007565321,0.00036487225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016612785,0.0000113835895,0.00025298496,0.000033164913,0.0000019655004,0.000075518175,0.0010084591,0.0003629871,0.000025143463,0.99362636,0.0016458349,0.0029545042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009740831,0.0000488024,0.0013987316,0.00093863066,0.000013787197,0.0002643625,0.012802586,0.0011460867,0.000095013784,0.7479315,0.23531805,0.00003276444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018544901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022603836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018544901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007859569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075146803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057025433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382047938","doi":"10.4337/cilj.2023.01.06","title":"Inward foreign investment screening targets China: interdisciplinary perspectives*","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge International Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Investment (military); Foreign direct investment; Treaty; Appeal; Open-ended investment company; International trade; Business; Bilateral investment treaty; Investment policy; International economics; International investment; Economics; Law; Political science; Return on investment; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.019393051074613324,"score_gpt":0.26294315500496895,"score_spread":0.24355010393035564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382047938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09246486,0.1996483,0.0040503745,0.26210028,0.001927429,0.00006050928,0.00013648039,0.000054112814,0.43955755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8459689,0.09218076,0.0019009807,0.028301599,0.002377043,0.00006374335,0.000086208565,0.000017922168,0.029102838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890506,0.0003996252,0.000038554503,0.00012245108,0.00021450434,0.000319788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998585,0.0005218461,0.00014653533,0.00008965001,0.0003756631,0.00028125808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003054365,0.00049654,0.0005090626,0.0023356415,0.002360368,0.0055973325,0.00094629684,0.003491858,0.0038674888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001860759,0.00014330345,0.00042205685,0.0023830736,0.0057560587,0.003690494,0.0025163384,0.002237905,0.00018835065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024471894,0.000054264852,0.0050619715,0.00031496264,0.000021910644,0.00053432805,0.0016709174,0.0015910732,0.0004750731,0.928007,0.015340704,0.04690333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000429357,0.00022214913,0.030054498,0.0031019682,0.000100773745,0.00076155626,0.013485487,0.009037265,0.0021185058,0.5148282,0.42610365,0.0001429624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021794794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023027461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021794794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074360585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011957187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053952575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389979427","doi":"10.4337/cilj.2023.02.08","title":"Large language models and the treaty interpretation game","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge International Law Journal","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Interpretation (philosophy); Analogy; International law; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Narrative; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0172333229506089,"score_gpt":0.2573812544151795,"score_spread":0.2401479314645706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389979427","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100966744,0.0008874728,0.4300169,0.043789923,0.00035345124,0.00023779795,0.00025935483,0.0013018317,0.42218652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9196303,0.000243003,0.057361264,0.0019587283,0.00009735988,0.00024079988,0.00016254472,0.00027926188,0.020026771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97419375,0.021803064,0.00043250178,0.0009554777,0.0018988708,0.00071635406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.955222,0.039259948,0.0011048557,0.0027305335,0.0009091936,0.00077338994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017160071,0.00072393497,0.0005707608,0.0010551492,0.0041283555,0.009107533,0.0021308996,0.003826328,0.012007764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043980543,0.0006100752,0.0009207232,0.0009786497,0.014681771,0.01645458,0.008364301,0.006696663,0.001473708],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051925785,0.000037662598,0.0004702326,0.000051386553,0.000009452338,0.00018657207,0.0080840215,0.0038401182,0.00039671527,0.96808493,0.003618911,0.015168088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044848963,0.000051807066,0.0002959563,0.00012226736,0.000014344599,0.0001972694,0.0048645893,0.04188786,0.00077373575,0.8845198,0.06718319,0.000044343367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00549941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065425215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017160071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041844486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034877805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090752244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399848862","doi":"10.4337/cilj.2024.01.01","title":"Trade law policing on the factory floor: next generation agreements and their corporate accountability tools","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge International Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Factory (object-oriented programming); Business; Accounting; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.11462145075174342,"score_gpt":0.25835525075649596,"score_spread":0.14373380000475255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399848862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0976022,0.008993766,0.05188993,0.1782359,0.0014124225,0.00006957347,0.00004362329,0.00021109647,0.66154146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97212833,0.0016218601,0.005246129,0.004774366,0.0005010125,0.00005504611,0.00001496025,0.00005544759,0.015602855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865568,0.008090042,0.00037141948,0.0007021725,0.0029401295,0.0013393984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.973538,0.019074306,0.0024583256,0.0024936344,0.0017275767,0.00070818583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015542963,0.00025150934,0.00029097588,0.0019919826,0.0058353534,0.018649947,0.0013119039,0.0060612094,0.0058016297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0257447,0.00038509446,0.00042574437,0.0014525177,0.033870224,0.01824175,0.0074211475,0.006912917,0.00048072686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004167228,0.000008424111,0.0002701778,0.000010288397,0.0000015343202,0.000053903692,0.004833512,0.00029067814,0.0000419495,0.98519474,0.0016796549,0.007610961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011854009,0.000017879811,0.0011126397,0.00031583768,0.000006878472,0.00010130616,0.0074433875,0.002243172,0.00038416684,0.82574403,0.16258207,0.0000367713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069490387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005767972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018649947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009745552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050160945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08220005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}