{"meta":{"query_hash":"f5ece1eafa6a","filters":{"venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs"},"cohort_total":35,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":35,"exported":35,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f5ece1eafa6a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Cambridge+Review+of+International+Affairs"},"results":[{"id":"W1984500485","doi":"10.1080/09557570500238076","title":"Bounded by the Reality of Trade: Practical Limits to a South American Region","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Regionalism (politics); Regional integration; Political science; Economics; Process (computing); Political economy; Economic system; Development economics; International trade; Politics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.040355938583790864,"score_gpt":0.3661917125192047,"score_spread":0.3258357739354138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984500485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08346878,0.04790503,0.010491714,0.3694437,0.00071059813,0.00002229524,0.0000445001,0.00003270547,0.48788077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97697157,0.008752907,0.0011996584,0.008972943,0.00028398223,0.000030088402,0.000012880492,0.000014184292,0.0037618738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99228656,0.0053222734,0.0001854928,0.0006511534,0.00081049366,0.00074396003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99289894,0.0047684535,0.00051543827,0.0006255577,0.0005991002,0.0005923667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009939445,0.0003656491,0.0007932263,0.0011142344,0.011999513,0.017646248,0.0011873862,0.0045175143,0.0042122127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00933579,0.00047921,0.00056468573,0.0014082922,0.068091676,0.015072323,0.01271578,0.00903492,0.0003435367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067833594,0.000006792416,0.00036758117,0.000053620457,0.0000070129777,0.00014704208,0.0131712295,0.00019430797,0.00008894065,0.9791333,0.0015003519,0.005323115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012618207,0.000015825555,0.00089201244,0.0005956098,0.00001435262,0.00026237767,0.042955313,0.0002582946,0.00008637227,0.8274794,0.12741074,0.000017154052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0153500335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016215684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017646248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065864394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009517495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052565455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994428193","doi":"10.1080/09557570701828402","title":"The continuous process of recognition and implementation of the Sami people's right to self-determination","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Declaration; Herding; Democracy; Political science; State (computer science); Livelihood; Identity (music); Treaty; Gender studies; Ethnology; Geography; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01625208808701438,"score_gpt":0.32990388708711604,"score_spread":0.31365179900010165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994428193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32126817,0.0024635592,0.01394736,0.051505785,0.0006696096,0.00019337425,0.00006209793,0.00008799128,0.609802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98701173,0.0002426075,0.001892179,0.0009382016,0.000070324124,0.000041584015,0.00001397647,0.000012452156,0.009776923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842153,0.007966765,0.0005294483,0.0015848792,0.0032251559,0.0024783963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870466,0.0058159484,0.0019142836,0.0020992886,0.0016683189,0.0014554382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01980718,0.00022680797,0.0003429866,0.000881851,0.0081068445,0.009280868,0.0012943965,0.003252612,0.00381983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017917102,0.0002809236,0.00036948168,0.0007711213,0.04274137,0.004875647,0.011114316,0.0073259682,0.00066804176],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016857695,0.000059827875,0.0032179,0.00003696375,0.000006824486,0.0002722677,0.105395705,0.00016077021,0.0007053986,0.86388284,0.0028423269,0.02340234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042177406,0.0002129264,0.018092712,0.0008279135,0.000020880008,0.0006135398,0.14894935,0.0011316992,0.003265465,0.36202705,0.4646627,0.00015357832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007982933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006083522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01980718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005761612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015653588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10475159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001176356","doi":"10.1080/0955757032000075753","title":"Systemic Conditions and Security Cooperation: Explaining the Persistence of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Regime 1","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nuclear weapon; International regime; Nuclear ethics; Sustenance; Demise; Law and economics; Nuclear power; Denial; Political science; Normative; Fragility; Political economy; Economics; Law; Biology; Physics; Psychology","score_opus":0.0163320685241453,"score_gpt":0.28688544039348285,"score_spread":0.27055337186933753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001176356","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42908454,0.014609045,0.03288294,0.039366383,0.0002757206,0.000055479817,0.0001367651,0.000099162535,0.4834899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966221,0.0011948325,0.0007577689,0.00017447342,0.0000618989,0.000010692982,0.00001594157,0.000004696899,0.0011576357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987431,0.00057957,0.000045787703,0.00022139914,0.00020431832,0.00020585033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784195,0.000984265,0.000566574,0.00016228111,0.00023824518,0.00020661195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002585718,0.000242716,0.00026062987,0.001457186,0.0016162937,0.0038369445,0.00058612425,0.0018059742,0.00287935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030378383,0.00016653571,0.0002923919,0.0012034682,0.017535334,0.0042322986,0.0030814048,0.0016758986,0.00020796715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009267528,0.000011464154,0.0019647388,0.00004250105,0.000005014048,0.00012160098,0.001485588,0.0010832964,0.00026834404,0.98957974,0.00066856085,0.0047599287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023477485,0.00006884536,0.012822797,0.00017141811,0.00001424287,0.00032612687,0.004310711,0.0032628838,0.00029125714,0.9503914,0.028292198,0.000024491703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016366177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017895057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038369445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035806359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00188418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0259794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017886984","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2011.558493","title":"Assessing the historical turn in IR: an anatomy of second wave historical sociology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Saint-Boniface; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Reification (Marxism); Historical sociology; Sociology; Reductionism; Dualism; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Social science; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.084142473899078,"score_gpt":0.37105200753018436,"score_spread":0.2869095336311064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017886984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08047995,0.026300631,0.19482453,0.042035364,0.0009985317,0.00022809101,0.000079101694,0.00015074201,0.6549031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9389034,0.011975064,0.024325812,0.0021886083,0.00079134485,0.00023793873,0.000073983225,0.00018709966,0.021316834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964561,0.0024806317,0.00008253287,0.00028158686,0.00043320286,0.00026593427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915223,0.0065176045,0.00049919065,0.00070412416,0.00047509937,0.0002818013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008788154,0.00049118756,0.00046698493,0.0064742556,0.0041466374,0.010982721,0.0012590153,0.0024409902,0.0060312776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008192,0.0004099286,0.00048493687,0.0043716244,0.040734317,0.024317503,0.0056770043,0.004096282,0.00046183253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004610396,0.000009074154,0.000305065,0.00003685126,0.000002375239,0.000049263035,0.017515369,0.00013729195,0.00008035587,0.9746412,0.00047946547,0.0067390194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005677833,0.00002302215,0.0009965326,0.00028085962,0.000005594644,0.0002126357,0.030364633,0.0009530253,0.00020897965,0.874163,0.0927716,0.000014463653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003570253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029866274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010982721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007972838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002540948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05784726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024375627","doi":"10.1080/09557570802020941","title":"The global importance of ‘illiberal moderates’, an exchange: partners in peace to precede a concert of democracies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign policy; Political science; Public opinion; Statement (logic); Sociology; Political economy; International relations; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06717339822312929,"score_gpt":0.33633719829470193,"score_spread":0.26916380007157265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024375627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06617513,0.019674195,0.008697371,0.2494915,0.00238862,0.000046243265,0.0000603976,0.00003691873,0.65342957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96155643,0.0038408712,0.00086425385,0.0100858165,0.0009423051,0.000043735265,0.000021276237,0.000032590433,0.022612743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730575,0.001593319,0.000061237464,0.00027822633,0.00038514604,0.00037627402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969472,0.001994534,0.00029363335,0.00032581942,0.00014714908,0.00029161316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005312117,0.00020452855,0.0003007895,0.000758998,0.0036458294,0.010159953,0.0006266145,0.0036186958,0.0043836893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061317743,0.00015913101,0.00017293279,0.0013767921,0.024200913,0.010483262,0.0051390235,0.006735432,0.00028079157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073372926,0.00000277516,0.00010901679,0.000020463383,8.4907794e-7,0.000030047517,0.007757964,0.00002371676,0.000037887312,0.9852175,0.0039077764,0.0028846485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025481493,0.0000402842,0.002412979,0.00042519675,0.000009294588,0.00019575955,0.025142977,0.00017760979,0.00029342072,0.44282043,0.52843374,0.00002273389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018248516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003892428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010159953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027084863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017516054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028093457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025084391","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2012.734786","title":"Between caution and controversy: lessons from the Gulf Arab states as (re-)emerging donors","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Middle East; Political science; Gulf war; Economy; Geography; Development economics; Economic history; History; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.024526725266918424,"score_gpt":0.336732469968254,"score_spread":0.3122057447013356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025084391","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1374629,0.022966966,0.0010011733,0.7078631,0.004271108,0.00003944618,0.00008504812,0.000031062333,0.12627923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90371215,0.011092994,0.0005606494,0.07127072,0.0014193583,0.00004398925,0.000034677378,0.000039305934,0.011826171],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921334,0.0057455273,0.00014018727,0.00033475092,0.00048104915,0.0011651737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9744931,0.019107688,0.0010049142,0.00058164576,0.0024535211,0.0023592717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016295604,0.0004597935,0.0004944873,0.0018417053,0.020854723,0.018312246,0.002070945,0.00961104,0.008639439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027516706,0.00030193763,0.0003381509,0.0024245186,0.02260385,0.014438757,0.009714296,0.012048863,0.00083128933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008809163,0.00007138226,0.0051747947,0.0002758649,0.000017971213,0.003223091,0.5181526,0.00026153575,0.000124856,0.33962744,0.09332992,0.03965246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001912619,0.000027649456,0.0017763791,0.0011047132,0.000009271685,0.0003578641,0.71290773,0.00020838992,0.00011745096,0.070021324,0.21341869,0.000031409618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023168778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042042952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023168778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068553872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0101746125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08618039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025987140","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2015.1023259","title":"The other resource curse: extractives as development panacea","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Resource curse; Panacea (medicine); Industrialisation; Economics; Curse; Natural resource; Elite; Poverty; Dutch disease; Democracy; Resource (disambiguation); Corporate governance; Revenue; Development economics; Economic system; Economic growth; Market economy; Political science; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0367857797938331,"score_gpt":0.2618210397144795,"score_spread":0.2250352599206464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025987140","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016991155,0.2983098,0.014513881,0.38393587,0.0017287034,0.0000735871,0.0003088477,0.0001136041,0.2840246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5787772,0.29900318,0.0064974194,0.04135577,0.003219124,0.00015110035,0.00017968252,0.00013225943,0.070684284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984188,0.0005936806,0.0000641818,0.00019065013,0.00046864006,0.00026412515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973206,0.0014739342,0.0004665433,0.00022424606,0.00029011763,0.00022462083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002951298,0.00060333434,0.0005926975,0.0017611511,0.0019478255,0.0069578467,0.00071028614,0.0032894195,0.011409735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00503935,0.0002582853,0.0003510577,0.0022933783,0.009958514,0.0121674305,0.0063637337,0.004664148,0.00091974204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024279223,0.000024266954,0.00067878776,0.00034184952,0.000015977494,0.000117725474,0.0005931371,0.0005734405,0.00015689044,0.92369175,0.01915729,0.05462463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011770372,0.00003676651,0.00096845377,0.001297883,0.000010952272,0.00013548798,0.0012739801,0.00038087647,0.0004153158,0.41881403,0.5766373,0.000017141836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003585171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049985787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011409735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004123126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045618983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038169324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031613489","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2012.734783","title":"Black banker, white banker: philosophies of the global colour line","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Line (geometry); Political science; Economics; Mathematics; Geometry; Chemistry","score_opus":0.022771201769694504,"score_gpt":0.3011052575838543,"score_spread":0.2783340558141598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031613489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028977325,0.013441708,0.016440192,0.09458545,0.0010224617,0.000038836104,0.000044735392,0.000047832724,0.8454014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9478847,0.004499938,0.004146622,0.010437351,0.0005179488,0.00010100903,0.000019119134,0.00008896877,0.03230423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626666,0.002559715,0.00005599287,0.0004335375,0.00044909297,0.00023511777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970631,0.0017891431,0.00021319313,0.00028029,0.00039264324,0.00026167693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054969513,0.00048687708,0.00032601994,0.0019185032,0.007037023,0.007330575,0.0008149178,0.0037239122,0.00914927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053247423,0.00026602324,0.0002623746,0.0023368874,0.046164766,0.010657859,0.0038110856,0.0051365984,0.0007323484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039527868,0.0000030863764,0.000039720686,0.000010095595,5.9561825e-7,0.000009395324,0.0037873238,0.00003391854,0.000017337596,0.9929866,0.0018710308,0.0012370739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012895357,0.000009693998,0.00035903734,0.00017281841,0.000004761187,0.00003937063,0.0069914213,0.00033109047,0.000078395045,0.9092114,0.082777485,0.000011736676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010873673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0082256505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010873673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008269541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025603957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059999943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046432215","doi":"10.1080/09557570701574154","title":"The fifth debate and the emergence of complex international relations theory: notes on the application of complexity theory to the study of international life","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"International relations theory; International relations; Shadow (psychology); Sociology; Critical theory; Epistemology; Politics; Pace; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.04149100600849792,"score_gpt":0.35974695468470536,"score_spread":0.31825594867620743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046432215","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0496702,0.030144127,0.049295686,0.505943,0.0027612615,0.000052143507,0.00014203425,0.00006787474,0.36192372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94902056,0.008596614,0.009783489,0.020628916,0.0018730401,0.00011911728,0.00009063097,0.000079421436,0.009808231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901147,0.005016123,0.0003317836,0.0011051105,0.002478102,0.00095423235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826132,0.011104757,0.0015671152,0.001989115,0.00171952,0.0010062023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014185957,0.0006078039,0.0009846607,0.004445416,0.008413351,0.01890228,0.002091168,0.007402905,0.0035033205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017046707,0.000348292,0.0015077285,0.0033636508,0.074343584,0.019158795,0.00924154,0.011341416,0.00048275903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034363798,0.0000024288788,0.00006430944,0.000011521769,0.0000016491987,0.000017800514,0.0012863887,0.0000827922,0.000009342073,0.99638724,0.0010678306,0.0010652808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013347511,0.000009120851,0.00031161733,0.00019022825,0.0000042198544,0.00006782667,0.0031199781,0.00059014326,0.00008173568,0.95104307,0.04455335,0.000015368812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069995616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040638223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01890228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014308164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064990027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10381347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047699159","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2012.744642","title":"Introduction: rising states, rising donors and the global aid regime","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Vice president; Associate editor; China; Political science; Corporate governance; Management; Library science; Economic history; Law; History; Economics","score_opus":0.011286736157587206,"score_gpt":0.2926256255751699,"score_spread":0.2813388894175827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047699159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018958553,0.07622385,0.0015373317,0.30796495,0.13074717,0.00007377974,0.0044261157,0.0004917418,0.4766392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06504918,0.086029716,0.0023186808,0.122884415,0.111960456,0.00028021008,0.004063629,0.00085076527,0.606563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997198,0.00007803508,0.00001173707,0.000053085187,0.00008651422,0.000050848037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989004,0.00065704156,0.000057247686,0.00004978226,0.00018515906,0.00015033828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005802728,0.0008166848,0.00039790833,0.0015561974,0.0017683636,0.0057513914,0.00084775395,0.0029555005,0.121272765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021615617,0.00032341582,0.0003970036,0.002532336,0.0014909265,0.005775357,0.0015509872,0.0043590013,0.016836727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009996517,0.000004159315,0.000098377575,0.00010533499,0.0000013225834,0.000017062332,0.00021063171,0.000023997509,0.000026177826,0.017250203,0.973637,0.008615685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004748019,0.000007895744,0.0009339023,0.00040957346,0.0000020632606,0.00003789679,0.00062050764,0.00004994711,0.00003426394,0.006845587,0.9910471,0.000006467783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007365101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008557772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121272765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014141944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010725791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40569782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055461382","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2015.1004948","title":"The new kings of crude: China, India, and the global struggle for oil in Sudan and South Sudan","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Poverty; Globalization; State (computer science); Politics; Political science; Natural resource; Economy; Sri lanka; Development economics; Economic history; Economics; Ancient history; South asia; History; Law","score_opus":0.01384119087011581,"score_gpt":0.29966016879182555,"score_spread":0.28581897792170974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055461382","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0703747,0.699124,0.00015048472,0.124717504,0.0028535298,0.00001689685,0.00015131623,0.00001296022,0.10259865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.633037,0.33362797,0.00017078454,0.006503555,0.0014704308,0.000020572954,0.00012385291,0.00000875446,0.025037238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957865,0.00012909454,0.000015796995,0.00002575364,0.00007244116,0.00017823423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939823,0.00021369325,0.00008815948,0.000028827657,0.00011111515,0.0001599582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001156219,0.00037115783,0.0003244708,0.002029623,0.0061376733,0.0052977167,0.00049096224,0.0011001508,0.004860636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013494286,0.00013873412,0.00021523572,0.0048521766,0.005557494,0.0041156225,0.0028139306,0.0018882207,0.00019171825],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017837918,0.00005617872,0.016384168,0.0016933422,0.00013768178,0.001564489,0.039024018,0.0007383113,0.00034040937,0.60388637,0.1699069,0.16608985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001825539,0.00003228221,0.03028625,0.002572744,0.000055866287,0.00037477512,0.08490299,0.00016484407,0.0002448309,0.04023618,0.8410617,0.0000492943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13584498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3226407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13584498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084421495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012424861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27010852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061978065","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2012.710586","title":"The EU's growing external role in the AFSJ domain: factors, framework and forms of action","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; European union; Economic Justice; Dimension (graph theory); Public administration; Law; International trade; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.019216964963420825,"score_gpt":0.3058704365459163,"score_spread":0.28665347158249543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061978065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45300248,0.0047939643,0.0048318817,0.03582094,0.00023457449,0.00005593904,0.00015540844,0.000060945422,0.50104386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933431,0.0005795616,0.00062556245,0.0011262209,0.000028322123,0.000017617853,0.000043631397,0.000016420705,0.0042196508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895762,0.0057628644,0.00036069617,0.0009169315,0.0015461205,0.0018371337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935567,0.0033333385,0.0008915391,0.0004302083,0.0009038561,0.00088444323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009445494,0.0003192602,0.00030673164,0.0017082944,0.004331738,0.017576307,0.00066028605,0.0017893423,0.0045978664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009591389,0.0001575163,0.00029205534,0.004378109,0.014374538,0.0053335354,0.0074091386,0.0026452318,0.00030164758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006491612,0.00009526196,0.028594993,0.00016746552,0.000023223149,0.0008593792,0.05019108,0.00073649315,0.00038575314,0.8722535,0.007903865,0.038724083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036220805,0.00011166129,0.12440564,0.0018689184,0.00003322201,0.0007645542,0.2777034,0.0010751985,0.0007645211,0.19645381,0.3966978,0.00008495521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008058305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00849315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017576307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005310603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005317224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049953103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067437498","doi":"10.1080/09557570902727551","title":"Autobiographical reflections on bridging the policy–academy divide","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"Political Science Research and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Luck; Sociology; Objectivity (philosophy); Politics; Power (physics); Political science; Positive economics; Law; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.05922040057501205,"score_gpt":0.45415805840157303,"score_spread":0.394937657826561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067437498","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021175178,0.026965735,0.002440051,0.70506114,0.06256865,0.00007881307,0.00032321646,0.00014703382,0.18124023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37157145,0.029159598,0.0013411045,0.26136178,0.023731379,0.0002679977,0.00029184364,0.00075125694,0.31152365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510914,0.0028463174,0.00008103422,0.0003639114,0.00083337247,0.0007662688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933361,0.004565712,0.00027868518,0.00036591187,0.0007154072,0.000738237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045687975,0.0009837248,0.0005311557,0.0019157351,0.015135062,0.010299431,0.0020930117,0.00730921,0.018218908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011624636,0.00050061423,0.00052930537,0.0030763934,0.016438961,0.009418398,0.0077313706,0.024773564,0.003948365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007055013,0.000060080347,0.0002573023,0.00019972902,0.0000075567314,0.00075674045,0.18964685,0.00011766167,0.0005985422,0.1824977,0.6112959,0.014491421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040319455,0.000009793092,0.00021924611,0.00018956336,0.0000016148518,0.000102535785,0.056809198,0.000035764293,0.00014496218,0.0069610816,0.9355091,0.000013112381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015171092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023243966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018218908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009744107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003677918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0706988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076627995","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2014.960811","title":"Hand in hand against climate change: cultural human rights and the protection of cultural heritage","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cultural heritage; Cultural rights; Human rights; Cultural heritage management; Environmental ethics; Climate change; Political science; Covenant; Context (archaeology); Normative; Fundamental rights; Industrial heritage; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06041427946150496,"score_gpt":0.2705330305417349,"score_spread":0.21011875108022993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076627995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017900389,0.009098033,0.0051496797,0.1898562,0.0011801559,0.000042904976,0.000102890306,0.000025963887,0.7766437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8964501,0.006533525,0.0017172914,0.037294026,0.0012984868,0.0001233276,0.000067921166,0.000036802445,0.056478575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939189,0.003315997,0.00015432596,0.00047859296,0.0008236434,0.0013084828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945176,0.0029034,0.0005338293,0.00065369473,0.0007442914,0.00064716494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068181376,0.00033929676,0.00033012312,0.00071080076,0.006881786,0.011769016,0.0012300934,0.009102138,0.014269776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008321443,0.00017228778,0.00038241147,0.0010612361,0.03055604,0.008337087,0.008793673,0.0080970805,0.0008971765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008573291,0.000013413741,0.00024383226,0.000026713655,0.0000033104336,0.00008294336,0.0029662456,0.0001267087,0.00007125727,0.98234105,0.0092127975,0.0049031656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018400324,0.000037210073,0.002077963,0.00093052385,0.000012875459,0.00017848847,0.010155909,0.00037309335,0.00039205333,0.6749503,0.3108323,0.0000409624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020166438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028684676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020166438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046994225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076226783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04773712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087975924","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2012.678303","title":"In the eye of the storm: Ambassador James Richards' mission to Iraq in April 1957","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Eye; Storm; Political science; Aeronautics; Meteorology; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.02610321076485618,"score_gpt":0.2722486666521272,"score_spread":0.24614545588727105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087975924","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1947305,0.042588823,0.00054100476,0.50154155,0.01389339,0.0000677494,0.00011655807,0.0000682149,0.24645212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6780766,0.024468983,0.00028391398,0.094554804,0.004880154,0.00006971566,0.00006210665,0.00008503467,0.19751866],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989207,0.00040740098,0.000016354772,0.000055825647,0.00014476936,0.0004550279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999371,0.0001931949,0.00008493027,0.000015421057,0.000101809856,0.00023362161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016848457,0.00044916876,0.00027303462,0.000622622,0.020005545,0.0047791917,0.0008155851,0.0042724414,0.0040260637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026970687,0.00029304856,0.00017190019,0.0008170962,0.0076053226,0.0024089047,0.004903807,0.0076464596,0.00088711793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088848836,0.000055148135,0.0027815008,0.00020523247,0.000014507882,0.006956137,0.42935967,0.00017347788,0.0006742984,0.089291364,0.44916186,0.021237843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075364696,0.000027022747,0.0015465388,0.00015340149,0.0000029325934,0.00044581835,0.14021218,0.000015683403,0.00011122954,0.0016099145,0.8558518,0.000015913556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06127507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.109185845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06127507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052012224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056335283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12183678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500297038","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2016.1170103","title":"Evolving norms of protection: China, Libya and the problem of intervention in armed conflict","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"China; Responsibility to protect; Intervention (counseling); Sovereignty; Political science; Normative; Norm (philosophy); Humanitarian intervention; Conflict resolution; Law; International law; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.010804327921303458,"score_gpt":0.2820268824945776,"score_spread":0.2712225545732741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2500297038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5588415,0.033991605,0.009079634,0.16523446,0.0007397458,0.00006283355,0.00005344115,0.000044346158,0.23195235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99247336,0.00246597,0.00048800022,0.0018564541,0.00016422805,0.000027680651,0.000008189809,0.0000062404088,0.002509833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950557,0.0030982143,0.00013850014,0.00027526816,0.00056886795,0.00086334714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99676454,0.0017236363,0.00047435632,0.0002512259,0.00035344463,0.0004326882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010748687,0.0003289864,0.0004072228,0.0017659806,0.007150463,0.008499866,0.0012114558,0.002896518,0.0020760787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059379665,0.00022578072,0.00022850232,0.002141866,0.049189184,0.0077753398,0.006390443,0.004305958,0.00010902108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032385346,0.000017321108,0.003417855,0.00005268937,0.000007725306,0.00015074402,0.03393593,0.00038487115,0.00009297784,0.94453394,0.0013198297,0.016053705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006028357,0.00010437625,0.01185667,0.0006259011,0.000018822562,0.00019067108,0.061306447,0.001899634,0.0004753338,0.8167282,0.10666343,0.00007034078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020059258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015805673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020059258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0115888715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011127122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08408356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790768256","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2018.1433800","title":"Domestic and international dynamics before and after the Arab uprisings","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamics (music); Political science; International relations; Political economy; International trade; Economic system; Economics; Politics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.012864103867541983,"score_gpt":0.3295221989838512,"score_spread":0.3166580951163092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790768256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17111723,0.0034134293,0.0006502912,0.02280702,0.006461263,0.0000440238,0.004395647,0.00042473018,0.7906863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5892945,0.0026469193,0.00057030126,0.002160124,0.001726158,0.000056808465,0.00306635,0.0002951841,0.40018356],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999833,0.000022396602,0.0000041807875,0.000015680518,0.000050207862,0.00007458211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992385,0.0001627699,0.00007072239,0.00003302758,0.0001783264,0.00031670378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038350996,0.00016269839,0.00017187069,0.0011706437,0.0014922603,0.0028199956,0.00019788001,0.00067643664,0.09578384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016083899,0.000094699186,0.0002068573,0.0010104111,0.0004608492,0.0019121469,0.000988168,0.0012839504,0.013704481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005666445,0.00012937852,0.014968138,0.00037813676,0.000024080493,0.0006414708,0.008379109,0.00017800799,0.0022807785,0.035951145,0.7562174,0.1802857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022400258,0.00007337264,0.09680667,0.00019408757,0.000012540159,0.00015208573,0.014612189,0.00012431877,0.0010444951,0.0033488807,0.88357407,0.00003494634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005930139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015801972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09578384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072787836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042946837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32042885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965245861","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2019.1642849","title":"Investigating the impact of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) on the contemporary world order: a case of Chinese SOE investment in the Canadian hydrocarbon sector","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"State Capitalism and Financial Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign direct investment; Order (exchange); Investment (military); Market economy; Corporate governance; Western hemisphere; Business; State (computer science); Resource (disambiguation); International economics; Economic system; Economics; Political science; Macroeconomics; Politics","score_opus":0.016655220582809833,"score_gpt":0.25208812978441114,"score_spread":0.23543290920160131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965245861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92833966,0.00043033823,0.000286138,0.0033395453,0.000008009272,0.000025693691,0.000027596556,0.0000035596422,0.067539446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970656,0.00028497356,0.000065326436,0.00014288133,0.0000042173756,0.0000046897753,0.00001021398,0.0000011078108,0.002421093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889237,0.00017230053,0.000020065829,0.000056672943,0.00023630104,0.0006223542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987846,0.00041218507,0.000261062,0.000094281335,0.00023922877,0.00020868212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001336446,0.00018596403,0.0002086882,0.0012316146,0.007801108,0.0035815616,0.00070138223,0.0012770899,0.0016392914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017965038,0.00011362408,0.00030855893,0.0020307077,0.010303563,0.0012239307,0.00202526,0.0015262775,0.00005737457],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006482792,0.00006439345,0.12045665,0.000083284525,0.00003448686,0.009737635,0.15389481,0.0021728738,0.0019451668,0.6871837,0.0038269216,0.020535136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054360207,0.00010115083,0.39696094,0.00044749922,0.00022286517,0.0015863364,0.40356234,0.011332884,0.0028053182,0.04157249,0.14118533,0.00016853111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8619486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90182745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13805139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03313838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017214987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27772874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971737044","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2019.1659229","title":"Principled realism and populist sovereignty in Trump’s foreign policy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign policy; Sovereignty; Realism; Foreign policy analysis; Presidency; Political science; Law; Foreign relations; Politics; Political economy; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01112920499790483,"score_gpt":0.3199500973315366,"score_spread":0.3088208923336318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971737044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046702113,0.07456106,0.03422631,0.27017933,0.0017974648,0.000043050917,0.000066692424,0.00006169812,0.5723623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9497956,0.012800374,0.004425324,0.016733667,0.0015626338,0.00009386064,0.000030343681,0.000048335503,0.014509803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957212,0.0025382002,0.00009156563,0.00040197247,0.0008093977,0.0004376514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976641,0.001561549,0.00017555259,0.0001954997,0.00026763522,0.00013570854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058330684,0.00031482792,0.00042705683,0.0015309462,0.004874423,0.0063461126,0.00068854605,0.00416734,0.001188687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006792717,0.00026765984,0.0004884839,0.0013910003,0.033711124,0.0066937865,0.0032023997,0.007860703,0.00020708445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013276523,0.0000013085744,0.000025490828,0.0000065312515,7.5997474e-7,0.000008469061,0.0004491697,0.00007980259,0.000009664235,0.99735475,0.0010018895,0.0010608439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051241154,0.0000056033464,0.00012747942,0.00010070891,0.000001292483,0.000025725125,0.00037811862,0.00022676539,0.000051492047,0.94616127,0.05291003,0.0000063794623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004172984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003142833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066883387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066883387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047754264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04852754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995841218","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2019.1710827","title":"The perils of accountability after crisis: ambiguity, policy legacies, and value trade-offs","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"City, University of London; University of Oxford; University College London; University of Cambridge; Economic and Social Research Council; University of Toronto; University of Kent; University of Cyprus; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Accountability; Bureaucracy; Ambiguity; Impunity; Politics; Populism; Value (mathematics); Political economy; Political science; Economics; Public administration; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.021001960239500995,"score_gpt":0.3183603124093545,"score_spread":0.29735835216985346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995841218","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1638295,0.02916965,0.024266653,0.4632508,0.0017227872,0.00006536035,0.00008659765,0.000108757406,0.3174999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98620635,0.0037348673,0.00084381754,0.006471283,0.0005704007,0.000034297507,0.000011770209,0.00004489157,0.0020822526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858948,0.008360551,0.00042420818,0.000843465,0.0026508223,0.0018261618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97883177,0.014969405,0.0026378306,0.0010414894,0.0014571638,0.001062356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021310603,0.0003271514,0.00054772565,0.0021560704,0.0075718574,0.017686648,0.0010711857,0.0056720185,0.0025007543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029533582,0.00032699053,0.00034444005,0.0020248543,0.05118961,0.016304482,0.010349156,0.009319028,0.00025174374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024345238,0.00001253146,0.0008947192,0.000069190144,0.0000070680567,0.00021482457,0.021572415,0.00041086273,0.00015843568,0.958013,0.0028114847,0.015811209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012988361,0.00002788234,0.0024587524,0.00042961672,0.0000063718553,0.00015644745,0.02437387,0.00045753337,0.00023847904,0.90911466,0.0626904,0.000032908803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032433355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033020407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021310603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010228384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00517691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11270255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012278465","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2020.1717844","title":"<i>Of global war and global futures. Rereading the 1940s with the help of Rosenboim and Barkawi</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"Italian Fascism and Post-war Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Keynesian economics; Economic history; Political science; Economics; Positive economics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.010803173214573716,"score_gpt":0.2680101992870032,"score_spread":0.2572070260724295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012278465","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005831631,0.82600725,0.00028710728,0.12765813,0.0140938815,0.000004050922,0.000052134677,0.000015270009,0.03129907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11694856,0.6774579,0.0012759586,0.083996356,0.046695367,0.00005055112,0.00016228182,0.00008795528,0.07332502],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917454,0.00040549928,0.000037567577,0.00008637326,0.00019887731,0.00009714263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988757,0.0006478453,0.000112235706,0.00008204154,0.00016861482,0.00011353077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015757836,0.0012274045,0.00054855325,0.0028843845,0.002249818,0.0052031246,0.0011046696,0.003432531,0.0040716226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033888556,0.00030752018,0.00049072824,0.0027880326,0.012806249,0.00891445,0.0019392614,0.0058277673,0.0013022121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033302655,0.000014844804,0.0004396561,0.00050038856,0.000019652503,0.00014237937,0.0050587147,0.00012441144,0.00010003577,0.3269605,0.62265766,0.043948475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062875793,0.000009052974,0.0011337068,0.0009353648,0.0000054365446,0.000111809306,0.0021361264,0.000047017686,0.000058607267,0.08480256,0.91074497,0.000009049003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03097359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04777251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03097359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006661285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042283298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06158662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041027857","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2020.1789558","title":"Clement to the Corinthians (on climate change?): sojourning as a theologico-political alternative to environmental emergency rhetoric","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"Religion, Ecology, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Politics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Theology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06202076411072293,"score_gpt":0.36722050589377087,"score_spread":0.30519974178304793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041027857","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008635666,0.1441496,0.0013671285,0.70302516,0.006542552,0.000008860035,0.000017628334,0.00002462337,0.13622871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7616415,0.060689874,0.001220607,0.13418321,0.010230413,0.000049615897,0.000023802972,0.0000820029,0.031879038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618113,0.0027347314,0.000049090428,0.0002949898,0.0004418939,0.00029830114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99673873,0.0025184704,0.00020875258,0.00014540378,0.00020906178,0.0001796689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044523557,0.00039568663,0.00041737626,0.0011617335,0.0056517054,0.0077325194,0.0008749861,0.0063297674,0.0021176252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007930938,0.00013934054,0.00023714232,0.0012209644,0.038379513,0.007326603,0.0028027056,0.007876252,0.00034252048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014141793,0.000007276455,0.00009358014,0.000105568775,0.000002423137,0.00009044392,0.009882978,0.00007606582,0.000039398463,0.9378422,0.04161064,0.010235269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001583996,0.0000147462715,0.00049821736,0.0009450556,0.0000042044344,0.00013753842,0.009099265,0.00014424202,0.00010212647,0.34497252,0.64405024,0.000016061333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010476024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014237402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010476024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007706667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004788886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05591607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135003524","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2021.1888880","title":"Regaining relevance: IPE and a changing global political economy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"Global Financial Crisis and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Mainstream; International political economy; Politics; Global politics; China; Political economy; Shock (circulatory); Political economy of climate change; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Political science; Economic system; Climate change; History","score_opus":0.01780616413103555,"score_gpt":0.2626564996676432,"score_spread":0.24485033553660765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135003524","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042592205,0.10582389,0.0117159905,0.6008109,0.0036256255,0.000029878722,0.00012856863,0.00007427886,0.23519869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89775574,0.051921036,0.00191014,0.029649822,0.0061868825,0.000036772624,0.000089113026,0.000056353,0.01239415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745756,0.00142728,0.000044574263,0.00024666125,0.00046967718,0.00035426143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678886,0.0018124364,0.00028123666,0.00029141008,0.00046988227,0.00035620062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004128863,0.00030149205,0.0004982136,0.0015005892,0.0022678864,0.009916366,0.0007590117,0.0033366566,0.004859679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00841784,0.0001627558,0.00034820221,0.0025586514,0.019519886,0.011955395,0.0046369974,0.0067830575,0.0006088388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008325374,0.00001113371,0.0005789334,0.000083187595,0.0000054660045,0.00010580439,0.0009781459,0.00035233254,0.000052971234,0.96440256,0.013907792,0.019513354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007119515,0.000011041452,0.0022035898,0.00019908846,0.0000041256726,0.00010976124,0.0014796192,0.00048861804,0.000045498087,0.86577106,0.12967099,0.000009549295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024380672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017959696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009916366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042392053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029540902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030757725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135918402","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2021.1889973","title":"The internationalization of the state versus ‘the causality of the international’","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Political economy; Constitution; Victory; State (computer science); Referendum; Argument (complex analysis); State capitalism; Empire; Brexit; Political science; Politics; Capitalism; Economics; Economic system; Law; International trade; European union","score_opus":0.02229096081164895,"score_gpt":0.316983993630956,"score_spread":0.29469303281930703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135918402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022815721,0.023345375,0.048031036,0.30590972,0.002867852,0.00004577429,0.00017031573,0.00011568802,0.5966986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9444348,0.01318031,0.004821824,0.016561203,0.0032852392,0.000119815566,0.0000946977,0.00010228605,0.017399814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567896,0.0021346307,0.00011123903,0.0007864184,0.00081573974,0.00047304752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586064,0.0024938595,0.0004908973,0.0005990665,0.00036219734,0.00019334609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006237135,0.000540243,0.0006578643,0.0017942786,0.002855445,0.008361355,0.0015705439,0.0038848438,0.004414204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008274153,0.0002733696,0.00053180003,0.002178782,0.060687102,0.014669498,0.004934936,0.007701082,0.0006024555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.795321e-7,9.5160516e-7,0.00002860869,0.000006288794,6.2461675e-7,0.00000411358,0.00030697547,0.000029634699,0.00000391758,0.9984302,0.0005852676,0.00060254446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052051687,0.0000062934514,0.00025066207,0.00009205833,0.0000027372346,0.000031302312,0.0012444627,0.0001427335,0.00006250174,0.9162078,0.08194834,0.0000058718842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003684928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030108902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008361355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048646396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054177195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035295546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230474745","doi":"10.1080/09557570903535755","title":"Anglobal governance?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"Philippine History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Corporate governance; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.008309263173156655,"score_gpt":0.2902053088122296,"score_spread":0.28189604563907295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230474745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077897996,0.045905523,0.0032436913,0.11535903,0.0010558327,0.000030583862,0.00007505158,0.000066012646,0.75636625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958357,0.009009341,0.00038649506,0.007001679,0.0003764918,0.00003403356,0.000038181304,0.000017404871,0.024779376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989222,0.0005113332,0.00001895065,0.0001448914,0.00011014687,0.00029249533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938786,0.0001557088,0.0001219655,0.000084001476,0.000083264196,0.00016719683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014257325,0.0001513825,0.0001507694,0.0006455237,0.0030037002,0.0075988113,0.00040306037,0.00087458355,0.0050098966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020776025,0.00010324103,0.00008524564,0.0010722828,0.012958652,0.005344427,0.002969269,0.0019457224,0.00057305075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049494593,0.00000859171,0.00089583953,0.0000323758,0.0000023005953,0.000036759673,0.007040443,0.00005151733,0.000023318056,0.9720104,0.008419716,0.0114738615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009798189,0.000017050708,0.0056282184,0.00051558256,0.000005184846,0.00011508839,0.021239864,0.0002402675,0.000099268706,0.3395087,0.6326106,0.000010291491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010491393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011653614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010491393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004104071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029378317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029777288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241833075","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2018.1544758","title":"Book review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.012812615615667584,"score_gpt":0.3051502654912535,"score_spread":0.2923376498755859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241833075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027890693,0.20840707,0.00072562473,0.060524162,0.08732195,0.00008570705,0.001011404,0.00038841562,0.6412567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016776336,0.053471733,0.00026672368,0.013138677,0.016162405,0.000047961,0.000519958,0.00015734237,0.91455746],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990889,0.00010981029,0.000029838899,0.00010558761,0.00056773814,0.00009812196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977495,0.00045290779,0.00011119472,0.00017822224,0.0010827353,0.00042540277],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093357795,0.00084926747,0.0009860998,0.004051195,0.001628755,0.0057762936,0.001362814,0.0026889571,0.30477262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057759928,0.00040009373,0.0005134825,0.004216643,0.0011644019,0.003319265,0.0019590969,0.0037261525,0.24468356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031356665,0.0000035452351,0.000014300807,0.000057019133,9.024589e-7,0.000010271156,0.000009191536,0.000012935138,0.000011850369,0.0020300641,0.97542167,0.022425069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015434722,0.0000018674555,0.000040475126,0.00009377064,0.0000010704052,0.000020872536,0.000013335434,0.000005240996,0.0000075625967,0.00065227365,0.99916065,0.0000014168035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006773006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015767554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30477262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030200349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004480885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244412503","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2011.559413","title":"Book reviews","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03794923996981286,"score_gpt":0.29160941167949567,"score_spread":0.2536601717096828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244412503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023066846,0.124301076,0.0007075857,0.0115961395,0.022669615,0.00008019537,0.00087402336,0.00043768217,0.839103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006940595,0.026842646,0.00028755254,0.0028837186,0.0029890025,0.000030968127,0.00045103783,0.00012311054,0.9656979],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992994,0.00007618991,0.000021457256,0.000085753825,0.00044843738,0.0000687602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990356,0.00017132466,0.000052724452,0.0001117037,0.0004335407,0.00019509974],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063626305,0.0011740297,0.0011045024,0.003954742,0.0014007543,0.0052142777,0.0013096854,0.0018583551,0.40893307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002654016,0.0004976016,0.00059595413,0.0043810676,0.0008768728,0.0029794856,0.0018562187,0.00281088,0.37178397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059159934,0.000008835003,0.000019222773,0.00011266659,0.0000014466827,0.000012536418,0.000017864564,0.000025866377,0.000052268068,0.002891985,0.94312245,0.053729035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014785005,0.0000025505203,0.00003984848,0.000076057855,0.000001056549,0.000015986288,0.000012502927,0.0000057790267,0.000012913895,0.0006193839,0.99921095,0.0000013762857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055614267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015177605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40893307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021243375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028935529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8430852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245463799","doi":"10.1080/09557570802692582","title":"Book reviews","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Wight; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02165753546670091,"score_gpt":0.33235381199469916,"score_spread":0.31069627652799825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245463799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027621308,0.05206081,0.0010432666,0.006679371,0.03742043,0.00025029515,0.0029100322,0.0012676965,0.89809185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006456019,0.017526258,0.00051986455,0.0021421954,0.005146611,0.00009518288,0.0016335318,0.00029632516,0.9719944],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988778,0.000074951735,0.000046332487,0.0001296963,0.00078877347,0.000082392115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997511,0.00027376573,0.00014794986,0.00023942508,0.0013387225,0.0004891296],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007616382,0.0016678704,0.001535124,0.004999499,0.0009448167,0.0044881697,0.0015593471,0.0019477116,0.69686353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003443984,0.00069197366,0.0008332347,0.005821806,0.00041222654,0.0025097965,0.0018004228,0.0020839067,0.6793376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040862974,0.0000103302555,0.000015187767,0.00017780217,0.0000025662423,0.000011127937,0.0000037966663,0.000021601016,0.00010331098,0.00036814963,0.9508057,0.048476357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038974404,0.00000577289,0.00008864512,0.00012779041,0.00000270103,0.000021743694,0.0000075660355,0.0000109417915,0.0000385716,0.00025942305,0.9994301,0.0000027673018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023119475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00646726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69686353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013628242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020532892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43238735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250168791","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2010.505133","title":"Book reviews","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.012434777729306129,"score_gpt":0.2963536842567498,"score_spread":0.28391890652744367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250168791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023076766,0.11532,0.00067382236,0.010203137,0.020826425,0.000079963575,0.00087001146,0.00043844577,0.85135734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00065914,0.024906805,0.00027759394,0.0026056455,0.0026236437,0.000029811332,0.00044349697,0.00011968339,0.96833426],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932766,0.000070220405,0.000020011188,0.00008262213,0.0004339196,0.000065646964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991115,0.00015617754,0.000048413072,0.00010171685,0.0004003846,0.00018186761],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006199099,0.0011940912,0.0011111599,0.0038848345,0.0013435495,0.005065898,0.0013013193,0.0018245991,0.40652394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025139097,0.00049396296,0.0005807973,0.004288754,0.000826251,0.0029399698,0.0017991173,0.002745561,0.37789735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000628728,0.000009490676,0.000019343373,0.00011522405,0.0000014516773,0.000012555669,0.000017407616,0.000026003028,0.00005761541,0.002821041,0.94082624,0.05608738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015886731,0.000002708756,0.000041092084,0.00007454132,0.0000010821439,0.000016477537,0.000012301753,0.000006257503,0.000014033883,0.0006253938,0.99920326,0.0000013845716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055770497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0150030805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59347606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020600667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028269014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84652156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298147347","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2022.2126746","title":"The behavioural logics of international public servants: the case of African Union Commission staff","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"Universitetet i Agder; Universitetet i Oslo; African Union; University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; King's University College","keywords":"Commission; Civil servants; Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03789068211131595,"score_gpt":0.3171062834592722,"score_spread":0.27921560134795625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298147347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9212388,0.0018941893,0.0011279455,0.030080548,0.00011929105,0.000050501858,0.000028415941,0.000010210518,0.045450054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963497,0.00043477025,0.00014200823,0.0014195718,0.000019026438,0.000020215715,0.000006758655,0.000005973292,0.0016018484],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9713009,0.01939216,0.00059217814,0.00073945645,0.0019312965,0.0060439734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748447,0.014958504,0.0032864173,0.0009922981,0.0017102782,0.004207812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02398768,0.000315258,0.00037857617,0.0028024605,0.026804326,0.0129043115,0.0017597082,0.0038601884,0.0035889477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030395664,0.00049743865,0.0003236842,0.003805877,0.03768577,0.009170493,0.00864679,0.0052236384,0.00032684373],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034400193,0.000051110877,0.0103962105,0.000060992934,0.00000654854,0.000954545,0.891524,0.00006900926,0.00013659691,0.08637126,0.0022097605,0.008185524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060421808,0.00001826515,0.004103468,0.00018622726,0.0000047979856,0.00016176834,0.9731531,0.0000818108,0.00007913005,0.0045481254,0.017641097,0.000016116555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09602681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0947524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09602681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03134916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019240916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22745514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381885057","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2023.2228179","title":"Eduardo Moncada, <i>Resisting Extortion: Victims, Criminals, and States in Latin America</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Extortion; Latin Americans; Politics; Liberalization; Political science; Economic history; Test (biology); Media studies; Law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.02583954908126425,"score_gpt":0.32260984123456166,"score_spread":0.2967702921532974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381885057","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012974793,0.6247148,0.0002893712,0.33549237,0.0054192157,0.000012609976,0.00020431435,0.000045530647,0.03252432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061600406,0.7555721,0.0009881746,0.104774095,0.009230555,0.0000843161,0.00031757084,0.00015719488,0.06727562],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992932,0.00032008588,0.00002718048,0.00008070518,0.00016675585,0.00011201588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907506,0.00042780137,0.00009682202,0.00003257135,0.00022864144,0.00013903865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001172168,0.0009639591,0.0005711717,0.0021373143,0.0032683348,0.004568696,0.0016124179,0.003861285,0.006355384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022274007,0.00039705032,0.00043311613,0.0029788935,0.004139875,0.006023841,0.0021197533,0.0045994534,0.0012928839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002281723,0.000026123285,0.001430152,0.0005513117,0.000022391232,0.00013199034,0.0049637887,0.00011794079,0.00008479506,0.05958313,0.90549785,0.027567817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000139646845,0.0000071916193,0.0026925646,0.0010310168,0.000019237423,0.00012535573,0.0071769888,0.00005777447,0.00012403965,0.018868834,0.9698574,0.000025595245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10184068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16261224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10184068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039521623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004303074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20249581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388128884","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2023.2271999","title":"Bringing back the concept of colonial pacification in the study of preventing violent extremism (PVE) practices: the case of Tunisia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Public Safety Canada","keywords":"Colonialism; Dominance (genetics); Persuasion; Peacebuilding; Politics; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1406761625505658,"score_gpt":0.44346468189389004,"score_spread":0.30278851934332424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388128884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7793952,0.056313116,0.0030987477,0.03929656,0.0004884971,0.00006510388,0.00005434018,0.000014982134,0.121273406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858667,0.008638128,0.00068253436,0.0011125673,0.00012767116,0.000021486974,0.0000073950987,0.000007089748,0.0035364646],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979468,0.0014687105,0.00004266852,0.000096957774,0.00007647954,0.00036834218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984428,0.0009557201,0.00031940718,0.00006617756,0.00009505616,0.00012078184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030175133,0.00040672737,0.0002917231,0.0014682275,0.011360804,0.0065804976,0.00088071666,0.0020266522,0.0020831295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028701895,0.0002000501,0.00021454562,0.0020639729,0.018006932,0.0042370544,0.0038950227,0.0023003444,0.00010997668],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034904093,0.000042304866,0.009852939,0.0003737725,0.000020634385,0.0043727555,0.71325815,0.00036242616,0.00053791475,0.24118154,0.0021090633,0.0278535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009056801,0.00007135019,0.022479234,0.001364249,0.000024650159,0.0016811896,0.72796744,0.0002810259,0.0006063667,0.015780285,0.2297004,0.000034783985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09185739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13567905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09185739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011903553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004920187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18264538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400217467","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2024.2368418","title":"Stories of world Politics: Between History and Fiction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; History; Literature; Media studies; Political economy; Art; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.038721512080106095,"score_gpt":0.2645781778835613,"score_spread":0.2258566658034552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400217467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050276704,0.14057475,0.007900713,0.17783315,0.007491242,0.000051855983,0.00032053975,0.00016206117,0.61538893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8853633,0.058437273,0.0022282535,0.011599015,0.006492028,0.00011019887,0.00028505723,0.00022583672,0.03525918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953675,0.00329282,0.000106260275,0.00024019771,0.00064037216,0.0003527469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823712,0.015068093,0.0007573513,0.0007732195,0.000499449,0.0005306841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003871695,0.00065489224,0.00043168623,0.003979999,0.0057441294,0.014440379,0.0011560374,0.0027085494,0.0071434993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018362975,0.00030860186,0.00026510312,0.003805794,0.037056677,0.01743745,0.004730825,0.0049437406,0.0009616896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023257971,0.000011378982,0.00035168498,0.00029338722,0.0000069026955,0.00036305754,0.12852465,0.00009717782,0.00011619874,0.80751944,0.04074794,0.02194498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054596976,0.000014012048,0.00064978417,0.0010333452,0.000006976437,0.0004317972,0.06353973,0.000113126654,0.00022232444,0.13341744,0.8005513,0.000014625296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018948502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024314644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014440379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049529253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013702922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035936117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404509050","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2024.2426782","title":"Nomads and international relations: post-sedentarist dialogues","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"South Asian Studies and Conflicts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"International relations; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.022779063557821073,"score_gpt":0.3191548832048846,"score_spread":0.29637581964706355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404509050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18957932,0.04643596,0.008087715,0.37080067,0.0069439122,0.00011336902,0.00008731369,0.00006736342,0.37788436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9531606,0.009145926,0.00072662253,0.012911939,0.0013066413,0.00009672992,0.000022131577,0.00008273409,0.022546621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9757388,0.020371148,0.00042770384,0.0007965744,0.001190653,0.001475204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97653276,0.02054738,0.0006911547,0.0006391633,0.0006431171,0.00094636733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037580788,0.0009360379,0.0011457764,0.0034213837,0.027843004,0.023126055,0.0026865897,0.010213667,0.005642556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023382599,0.00061691983,0.0006212918,0.005184846,0.09407445,0.025555996,0.015082166,0.020979196,0.0004896928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009153143,0.000016295486,0.00013999341,0.00006157375,0.0000022711818,0.00020088138,0.46987677,0.000039398972,0.000064903674,0.5249809,0.0025896141,0.0020182114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011616198,0.000028980945,0.00047973753,0.000528037,0.0000054910033,0.00020656132,0.5808566,0.0001361472,0.00014032853,0.08523465,0.33235204,0.000019733285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007466691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01052611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037580788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022133354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008215892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19874859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410285286","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2025.2503507","title":"Orientation, Othering and medicalisation: a queer phenomenology of AMR community identity formation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","topic":"Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Phenomenology (philosophy); Sociology; Identity (music); Orientation (vector space); Gender studies; Sexual orientation; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Geometry","score_opus":0.02498408061881842,"score_gpt":0.3710781826709007,"score_spread":0.3460941020520823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410285286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57065874,0.005640883,0.057886563,0.06719084,0.00081822125,0.00039636123,0.00019471227,0.00016829645,0.29704535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872241,0.000955584,0.0026688075,0.0014664506,0.00007620298,0.00006427358,0.000029082152,0.00006321572,0.007452284],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99250776,0.0059887385,0.00009013903,0.0004046641,0.00051151414,0.0004971533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99348986,0.0047636162,0.00051406305,0.00042506223,0.0003253156,0.00048200373],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008066092,0.00050853734,0.00050585496,0.001685695,0.014070513,0.0078123026,0.0016204285,0.002640452,0.0029759915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011131115,0.00035117636,0.00047556634,0.0014898132,0.061442632,0.0138698695,0.008000814,0.0061912965,0.00042620298],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011137572,0.000010498394,0.0002848149,0.000024204925,0.0000024370963,0.00042647618,0.8822533,0.00006754368,0.00018896666,0.11434225,0.0007449338,0.001643415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013798081,0.000029482177,0.00050111266,0.00015261298,0.000006056591,0.0011042987,0.8506093,0.00048399717,0.00027935335,0.06287643,0.083903834,0.000039595874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007872356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008249456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9859295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005764008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033142255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04265803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}