{"meta":{"query_hash":"dde2c65b3f98","filters":{"venue":"Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/dde2c65b3f98","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Cambridge+yearbook+of+European+legal+studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1735881894","doi":"10.1017/s1528887000001415","title":"Free Movement of Services versus National Labour Law and Industrial Relations Systems: Understanding the <i>Laval</i> Case from a Swedish and Nordic Perspective","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European court of justice; Free movement; Industrial relations; Resizing; Perspective (graphical); Competition (biology); Labour law; Political science; Movement (music); Competition law; European Union law; Social partners; Wage; Law; Economy; Sociology; European union; Economics; Market economy; International trade","score_opus":0.08500138921887089,"score_gpt":0.29504020147736476,"score_spread":0.21003881225849386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1735881894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8385323,0.004711388,0.000011247356,0.0009994972,0.00041020036,0.00030853652,0.0005208144,0.000021766968,0.15448423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805266,0.0006141095,0.000013840174,0.0001901911,0.0003519517,0.0000038201815,0.0000023787677,0.000009216874,0.00076182495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989243,0.0002303582,0.00021412689,0.0001659914,0.00033984115,0.00012534267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991368,0.00029175784,0.00015715038,0.00010806405,0.0002585413,0.000047668924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043119583,0.00009289205,0.00016685404,0.000037078575,0.00084849383,0.000041025603,0.00011720694,0.000022982722,0.00000418861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015424001,0.00007178612,0.00003070179,0.00013101878,0.0008472122,0.00017724806,0.00017822199,0.00010752034,5.2245963e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033544642,0.000027614935,0.0015169607,0.000007333842,0.0002914353,0.000059127226,0.01810405,0.000010649216,0.000040969702,0.97791797,0.0019834973,0.000006838716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0089565795,0.00056873466,0.07956644,0.00050482847,0.0005057774,0.000027206715,0.79967487,0.000062671395,0.00008652943,0.0038860233,0.10548142,0.0006789337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0342751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005196642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9740319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015511208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000770101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97215575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316874097","doi":"10.5235/152888712802730657","title":"Dealing with<i>Viking</i>and Laval: From Theory to Practice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Liability; Action (physics); Falling (accident); Core (optical fiber); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Psychology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.017958020459187807,"score_gpt":0.23681638207300792,"score_spread":0.2188583616138201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316874097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55536014,0.0050746,0.00062298356,0.0033125437,0.00026499663,0.00029025497,0.0000073963356,0.00015381988,0.43491328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885311,0.00023129603,0.00076186855,0.0076608164,0.0011335801,0.0000017875432,0.0000030602569,0.000032726686,0.0016437342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991482,0.000024050312,0.00020249018,0.0002587297,0.00019264616,0.00017390786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992663,0.0000891204,0.00023786297,0.00018753852,0.00020355807,0.000015611295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040168798,0.0001627314,0.00022887063,0.000058624293,0.00011319909,0.000119365504,0.0001388386,0.000012459196,0.000006055742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002768025,0.00013111258,0.000034462773,0.00014255641,0.00008425178,0.00062781374,0.00016444808,0.00009909463,0.0001186625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001773004,0.0001994255,0.0045194696,0.00016136594,0.0005990706,0.0009292368,0.001110208,0.00010103748,0.008806034,0.83291584,0.055204768,0.09368051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045375142,0.000093405004,0.03901857,0.00025726686,0.00015598083,0.0000040156283,0.00067799207,0.0000084411995,0.00021067442,0.00034024043,0.95851207,0.0002676021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027590035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027906262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9033073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011485239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008774729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5346616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326540627","doi":"10.5235/152888712805580372","title":"An Illusion of Protection and an Assumption of Responsibility: The Possibility of Swedish State Liability after<i>Laval</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Liability; Enforcement; Political science; Legislature; State (computer science); Law; Legislation; State responsibility; Conflict of laws; Common law; Law and economics; International law; Economics","score_opus":0.04328816567345499,"score_gpt":0.3368818917960255,"score_spread":0.2935937261225705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326540627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98401815,0.0011994581,0.000029730469,0.00008249517,0.00013115095,0.00042570353,0.000082032966,0.000020118083,0.014011156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987463,0.00045578255,0.000071331124,0.000030801384,0.00016495345,0.0000038073017,9.948999e-7,0.000013697627,0.000512369],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627715,0.0023044404,0.0005675939,0.00024302836,0.00039298952,0.00021477768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832094,0.00016006455,0.0005450719,0.00048873725,0.0003970386,0.000088179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005505327,0.00012661803,0.00031622974,0.000046379006,0.00016011953,0.000011052844,0.00021769217,0.000026174666,0.000005356625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013146006,0.00009523462,0.00007856402,0.00019079166,0.001868635,0.00054302014,0.00016185605,0.00013615668,0.0000015647446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006196001,0.0036506685,0.43120524,0.0023852238,0.00042683122,0.000010893298,0.22947276,0.000046897418,0.22038095,0.059659224,0.0005642869,0.04600103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002101921,0.00041317986,0.98434883,0.00009703678,0.000034032528,6.133779e-7,0.0019851895,0.000006412996,0.009350517,0.00008491601,0.0033683234,0.00010075874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002353643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038431416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5531436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045308236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000063451036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68850636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328781621","doi":"10.5235/152888713809813440","title":"Beyond the Control Paradigm? International Responsibility and the European Union","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"European union; International law; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Human rights; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Public international law; Law; International trade; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.018094288309816502,"score_gpt":0.2754131201356886,"score_spread":0.25731883182587206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328781621","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18350919,0.0006412265,0.000039358732,0.01312115,0.0004654368,0.00036601996,0.000010219616,0.000029178096,0.80181825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971512,0.000115344534,0.000012840677,0.0006567084,0.00079230603,0.0000069637795,0.0000014423957,0.0000115360535,0.026890837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639124,0.002682905,0.00026088455,0.00017342957,0.0003324269,0.00015911314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878967,0.0005851184,0.00013581233,0.00018770371,0.00026064392,0.000041042767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040578316,0.000101675054,0.0001528369,0.000030785788,0.00062189053,0.00014014108,0.00044106413,0.000011633461,0.00004445656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004502422,0.000053080865,0.00007683082,0.00003338778,0.0022588305,0.00018958833,0.0001520876,0.00014014088,0.00016270821],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000332962,0.000014319639,0.00020364186,0.0000027972774,0.00012187878,0.0000059907316,0.0027908979,0.0000015185018,0.000027325625,0.9890054,0.007033426,0.0007595364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028793192,0.00009236645,0.37557074,0.000068586545,0.000107155116,0.000007777811,0.0020962586,0.000059856917,0.000038208287,0.049787343,0.56898654,0.0003058815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005859643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012555865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93921804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040239338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028372751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83227545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330197147","doi":"10.5235/152888712805580336","title":"Up in the Air: Aviation, the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and the Question of Jurisdiction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Directive; Member state; Emissions trading; International trade; Sovereignty; European union; Aviation; Political science; Law; International law; Business; Member states; Greenhouse gas; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.03152599781055067,"score_gpt":0.32314393883856857,"score_spread":0.2916179410280179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2330197147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7056768,0.0039975266,0.000106660314,0.01192331,0.0006057309,0.00042855743,0.0000066850585,0.000022959382,0.2772318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732107,0.00044500598,0.000018542996,0.00018808452,0.00042063455,0.000006395339,0.0000014316516,0.0000046836903,0.0015941793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871916,0.0006545536,0.00019920849,0.00006436185,0.00025699503,0.00010571943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933904,0.000314542,0.00014107832,0.000080180755,0.000110157576,0.00001497351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002762642,0.00005515595,0.00008961058,0.000027759505,0.0003674318,0.000017528091,0.00014291359,0.000014368771,0.000002932553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052848214,0.000027888764,0.000041866726,0.0001118348,0.0004714706,0.00018939123,0.0000349336,0.00010130919,0.0000044519443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018335882,0.000019582052,0.0038198645,0.000006176244,0.000029197023,2.4179218e-7,0.021660537,0.0000018731666,0.00015933432,0.9715115,0.0023457343,0.000427625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094057707,0.000053248612,0.7467157,0.00019055988,0.00008950434,0.0000038641597,0.022843994,0.0001236314,0.0004474914,0.00083840213,0.22759505,0.00015793984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049006846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007852371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9706731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003226371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021469556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28260255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477447154","doi":"10.1017/s1528887000001646","title":"Normative Interactions and the Development of Labour Law: A European Perspective","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Law; Common law; Human rights; Political science; Labour law; Convention; Sources of law; European Union law; International law; Municipal law; Scots law; Preliminary ruling; European union; Sociology; Economic Justice; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.03363735416813964,"score_gpt":0.33301566322922244,"score_spread":0.2993783090610828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477447154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10053421,0.000569452,0.000035952864,0.001402101,0.000103107086,0.00013422736,0.000010336848,0.000021039432,0.89718956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880391,0.0001160131,0.00023595599,0.0003666475,0.00016060182,0.0000015854228,7.457772e-7,0.000007126992,0.011072224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988395,0.00043274742,0.0002637431,0.00011604003,0.00022431265,0.00012366155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991955,0.0001168689,0.00014846832,0.00007891362,0.00042879913,0.000031448733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009016693,0.0000872166,0.00016624898,0.000038852904,0.00037435925,0.000029203275,0.0001726006,0.000006383729,0.000009520431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018777513,0.00006148344,0.00005107835,0.00008588687,0.00079764763,0.00016518573,0.00008910841,0.000095215146,0.00002602409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004750965,0.00003187073,0.000036005888,0.000005207315,0.00011504395,0.0000034594123,0.051322844,0.0000011512533,0.0001390242,0.9473108,0.0005793183,0.00040775133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018078833,0.00018015095,0.094315305,0.00027950367,0.00008068562,0.0000039670504,0.075292684,0.000004742457,0.0017300795,0.0016962107,0.8242656,0.00034315902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043119356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002963876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9456146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072240815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038186543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2938966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2487799831","doi":"10.1017/s1528887000001427","title":"<i>Viking</i> and <i>Laval</i>: Issues of Horizontal Direct Effect","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Member states; Legislation; Treaty; Political science; Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Common law; Preliminary ruling; Business; European union","score_opus":0.028512892224978246,"score_gpt":0.29756878859049757,"score_spread":0.2690558963655193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2487799831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.405742,0.0146246925,0.0000011230871,0.00017365871,0.00022661567,0.00011902219,0.0000128248175,0.000044612636,0.5790555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739773,0.014484024,0.000051711228,0.00007247932,0.00045979905,0.0000024729798,0.0000015241311,0.000024336798,0.010926311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983978,0.0004398176,0.00031752948,0.00023803653,0.00039109492,0.00021566487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915993,0.00024465926,0.00017061607,0.00013345349,0.0002302437,0.0000610728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007537754,0.00016464491,0.00042418332,0.000063890264,0.0003618335,0.000014730904,0.00020990873,0.000018426097,0.000004568668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006284148,0.00013930116,0.0001138345,0.00011572081,0.0016561364,0.00015801116,0.00021983826,0.00009818117,0.00003831622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055132573,0.000429903,0.08871542,0.00062840834,0.0025879776,0.0008474923,0.050211698,0.000004883975,0.022925492,0.4977668,0.32831976,0.007010857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060095417,0.00070739846,0.048671786,0.00023687453,0.00007291249,0.000011448535,0.0012611788,0.0000013696429,0.0069325347,0.000012564959,0.9412005,0.00029048263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005559647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046554407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61288077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000273619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028540946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61021036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489783621","doi":"10.1017/s1528887000001440","title":"<i>Viking</i> and <i>Laval</i>: Collective Labour Rights and Market Freedoms in the Enlarged EU","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European court of justice; Dilemma; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Action (physics); Collective action; Law and economics; Dumping; Function (biology); Law; Economics; International trade; European Union law; Political economy; European union; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.02313744213154554,"score_gpt":0.2627166658897806,"score_spread":0.23957922375823507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489783621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66627914,0.0033244418,0.0000015444149,0.0007643652,0.00010825623,0.00023173897,0.00002615606,0.000017716791,0.32924664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976502,0.0024976537,0.000038169914,0.0009581296,0.00019458597,0.0000064492187,8.46276e-7,0.000010783287,0.019791387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985516,0.00056071655,0.00019289971,0.00020632437,0.00025422647,0.00023420519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942136,0.00021325964,0.00008273571,0.00012395062,0.00010862763,0.000050043374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009291651,0.00011948961,0.00021787333,0.000058238067,0.0007494005,0.00004010467,0.0001688795,0.000021962776,0.000006795811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020420179,0.00008202593,0.000031172025,0.00025271837,0.001040508,0.00013757289,0.00012473487,0.00013693007,0.0000018171422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113092465,0.00028198797,0.026744297,0.000037995982,0.00032763192,0.0005063081,0.12215822,0.0000010019636,0.0005145219,0.57488024,0.2738125,0.0006222086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000557792,0.00007732697,0.43813783,0.00003858427,0.000018639197,0.000004924921,0.00401134,0.0000010513136,0.000040808474,0.0001428031,0.5568442,0.00012470453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030554603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019420199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5747374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003615449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058113397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57638586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500151669","doi":"10.1017/s1528887000000823","title":"Regulatory Competition after <i>Laval</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aside; Competition (biology); Legislature; Action (physics); Economics; Production (economics); Virtue; Public economics; Law and economics; International economics; Market economy; Political science; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.025472798087765307,"score_gpt":0.20444421661548523,"score_spread":0.17897141852771992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2500151669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7196851,0.0020393513,0.0000108726,0.00018218272,0.00028780915,0.00009369307,0.0000041373833,0.000079082914,0.2776178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902548,0.0003139861,0.000024423036,0.0013856632,0.0015282759,0.0000053968074,0.000006143652,0.000034015728,0.006447261],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990884,0.000016114464,0.00026298387,0.0002144379,0.00023463512,0.00018340394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933326,0.000013414551,0.0002210862,0.00023160983,0.000190977,0.000009661904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017634717,0.00015762035,0.0002364923,0.00007080753,0.00012854082,0.000030791285,0.00014134328,0.000016206635,0.000033031676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041453895,0.00014293792,0.00009911252,0.00015818751,0.00028993696,0.00054945354,0.00022497897,0.00009044397,0.0007066584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045689708,0.00032953915,0.0736336,0.000860276,0.00040532305,0.0020805476,0.00039766153,0.00003926041,0.008911631,0.24392323,0.66613823,0.0028237875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036660972,0.000017210135,0.34206122,0.00012074324,0.000037786118,0.0000088729785,0.00007451504,0.000008708206,0.00031558145,0.000027753951,0.6567509,0.00021010838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008901846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016646014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27117056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020965137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013483048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90828997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2506511725","doi":"10.1017/s1528887000001403","title":"<i>Viking</i> and <i>Laval</i>: An Introduction","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies","topic":"European Socioeconomic and Political Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accession; Enthusiasm; European union; Elite; Political science; Wage; Communism; Politics; Work (physics); Member states; European commission; Trade union; Brexit; Economy; Economic history; International trade; Economics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.057765986732258995,"score_gpt":0.23683574973313973,"score_spread":0.17906976300088073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2506511725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7292159,0.01656001,0.000059958154,0.0011309335,0.00046318572,0.00011660505,0.00005652406,0.0000716435,0.2523252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98235637,0.005101906,0.00023187725,0.0005175082,0.0013221891,0.0000033802578,0.000006578503,0.00004464017,0.010415557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986615,0.00006147446,0.0005498328,0.00042533598,0.000034651803,0.00026719132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999315,0.000046703328,0.00021939541,0.00026623477,0.000057773123,0.00009489779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046251665,0.00018227495,0.00048487828,0.00007550477,0.00023489604,0.000020727424,0.00014556637,0.00002382221,0.000016282378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016639449,0.00019237968,0.00008387793,0.000065566936,0.0007296598,0.00025103378,0.00018879276,0.00014117442,0.00042580816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036884187,0.00011722396,0.040501658,0.00009233782,0.0003572216,0.000059266684,0.0027020962,0.000006222746,0.0001661059,0.87742144,0.0779589,0.00058065366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053176103,0.0002527988,0.10384881,0.000013874894,0.00001855977,0.00004521239,0.00045788963,0.000012649691,0.00017831752,0.0005013597,0.8937806,0.00035815177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000051169984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001875402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87692004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039463095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000075587327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78450155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560282110","doi":"10.1017/s1528887000001439","title":"A Human Rights Analysis of the<i>Viking</i>and<i>Laval</i>Judgments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collective bargaining; Opposition (politics); Political science; Legislation; Collective action; Trade union; European court of justice; Speculation; Deference; Law; Law and economics; Action (physics); Order (exchange); European union; Sociology; Economics; European Union law; International trade","score_opus":0.03821125030584254,"score_gpt":0.29755052618141525,"score_spread":0.2593392758755727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560282110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8210043,0.0006862818,0.000002306065,0.00015531268,0.00012324192,0.000115183386,0.000018998579,0.00001820411,0.1778762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98545796,0.00025837653,0.000023685487,0.00018220358,0.00010214925,0.0000019352153,0.0000011278089,0.000008910987,0.013963671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987204,0.00025386285,0.00029121747,0.00018139523,0.00036299028,0.00019010103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931186,0.000041073694,0.00020186092,0.00023056525,0.00016232993,0.00005233307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038733645,0.000106237225,0.0003075918,0.00010665018,0.00092283404,0.000012865261,0.00026355838,0.00001785676,0.000012351359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006444202,0.00007355863,0.00016239235,0.0005238973,0.0010292518,0.00009005265,0.00021358686,0.000080582126,0.0000018211396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017577458,0.0003470668,0.09114148,0.00002970891,0.005482965,0.000058417594,0.027253356,0.000024711473,0.0050251544,0.8432712,0.026981518,0.00036682966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026109404,0.00004369794,0.7664141,0.000041355197,0.00047599387,3.5830826e-7,0.0005144132,0.0000016052097,0.0005211479,0.000033722343,0.23157023,0.00012229678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004082934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015551022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8432375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003070846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026311027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70977867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047413341","doi":"10.1017/cel.2020.4","title":"The CETA ICS and the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order in Opinion 1/17 – A Compass for the Future","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European University Institute","keywords":"Openness to experience; Autonomy; Political science; European union; Law; European court of justice; Law and economics; Business; Economics; International trade; European Union law","score_opus":0.027180178377505707,"score_gpt":0.24160355156857877,"score_spread":0.21442337319107307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047413341","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020572642,0.0098017175,0.0001908422,0.28700086,0.0019136453,0.0020514522,0.000022560445,0.00004944404,0.6783968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703786,0.00025002623,0.000021746295,0.02567982,0.0019006564,0.000024586994,0.0000037840894,0.000018442812,0.0017223563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992813,0.000049908827,0.00027152972,0.00012070268,0.00016779575,0.000108762775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992835,0.0001696616,0.0002184423,0.00012911325,0.00019418982,0.000005099422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048084022,0.00010738361,0.00015309037,0.000016659991,0.0003115299,0.00012534794,0.00033883454,0.000010623487,0.0000035060666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015579014,0.000044899232,0.000082630824,0.00013871437,0.0004644437,0.00019822095,0.00029794383,0.0001257377,0.0000072239873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010812797,0.000013398287,0.00021516117,0.000050205363,0.000106266096,5.1050483e-7,0.00023594561,0.00004118323,0.000038283284,0.94806004,0.05090043,0.00023043777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008477871,0.000012810629,0.0128716435,0.00003373336,0.00003247324,4.5742487e-7,0.0008308833,0.0038363142,0.000031601972,0.00007561116,0.9813647,0.00006192772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056047244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004104183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9498059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011423969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002377925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23960677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122232660","doi":"10.1017/s1528887000002573","title":"The EU and Environmental Multilateralism: The Case of Access and Benefit-Sharing and the Need for a Good-Faith Test","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multilateralism; Convention on Biological Diversity; Good faith; Legitimacy; Montreal Protocol; Political science; Test (biology); Faith; Law and economics; Convention; International law; International trade; Diversity (politics); Law; Business; Sociology; Ecology; Geography; Politics; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.02421884127955271,"score_gpt":0.27501270937482075,"score_spread":0.25079386809526805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122232660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.974227,0.0029201154,0.000009262072,0.009144495,0.00009058442,0.00063088705,0.000032716067,0.000018695455,0.012926261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99677783,0.00084868306,0.000020960622,0.0001670044,0.00013068634,0.000006559493,7.060849e-7,0.000016039276,0.0020315533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993299,0.00010165664,0.0001859294,0.00015613066,0.00008708993,0.00013926129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988092,0.0008436635,0.00013355596,0.00014440231,0.000034344623,0.00003481487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008686364,0.000095159034,0.00015715018,0.000015353657,0.0009121409,0.0001426214,0.00020555696,0.000012021381,0.0000010762698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031978852,0.00004944926,0.000025308364,0.00006173145,0.0020846573,0.00013261016,0.00034433047,0.000062844425,5.684974e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007370993,0.000034823886,0.020352477,0.000067879744,0.00017952383,0.000017556595,0.018532436,0.00000711616,0.0005437176,0.9559944,0.00077550334,0.0034208412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01082465,0.00053505244,0.44313663,0.000336665,0.00090854126,0.00025979124,0.058527883,0.0026272824,0.0022432476,0.0020708512,0.47744507,0.0010843527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038597942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003598181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9539236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001054282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004395314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7681007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231037936","doi":"10.1017/s1528887000002330","title":"An Illusion of Protection and an Assumption of Responsibility: The Possibility of Swedish State Liability after Laval","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Liability; Enforcement; Political science; Legislature; State (computer science); Law; Legislation; Conflict of laws; State responsibility; Common law; Law and economics; International law; Economics","score_opus":0.0440906620666226,"score_gpt":0.3394424402180134,"score_spread":0.2953517781513908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231037936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98579794,0.0009125997,0.000023487697,0.00007577064,0.00011907736,0.0003717872,0.00007190672,0.00001684104,0.012610595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99886024,0.0003006421,0.00006430403,0.000024388451,0.00016786974,0.0000032282092,8.6735287e-7,0.000011996248,0.0005664856],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966026,0.0021230874,0.00050119223,0.00021845776,0.0003594231,0.00019522947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985443,0.00013745498,0.00045449252,0.00042363632,0.00036267904,0.0000774786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005010628,0.00011314229,0.00028141832,0.000042320225,0.00013860576,0.000009903606,0.00018541132,0.000024334868,0.0000065020904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011680218,0.00008354786,0.000071107504,0.0001577146,0.0017289069,0.0004968228,0.00014678121,0.00012620486,0.0000015389065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0062726014,0.0032100365,0.51374507,0.0019133416,0.00039438423,0.000010180203,0.22553824,0.000037703903,0.1547158,0.05541485,0.00046055953,0.038287207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018489108,0.00035243537,0.98847586,0.00007475396,0.00002820752,4.936696e-7,0.0017088725,0.0000057476886,0.0063855117,0.00006786937,0.0026307576,0.00008457263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020097846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000365517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4747308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004021603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056060744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.637023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232896811","doi":"10.1017/s1528887000002342","title":"Up in the Air: Aviation, the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and the Question of Jurisdiction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Directive; Member state; Emissions trading; International trade; European union; Sovereignty; Aviation; Political science; International law; Law; Business; Member states; Greenhouse gas; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.03152599781055067,"score_gpt":0.32314393883856857,"score_spread":0.2916179410280179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232896811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7056768,0.0039975266,0.000106660314,0.01192331,0.0006057309,0.00042855743,0.0000066850585,0.000022959382,0.2772318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732107,0.00044500598,0.000018542996,0.00018808452,0.00042063455,0.000006395339,0.0000014316516,0.0000046836903,0.0015941793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871916,0.0006545536,0.00019920849,0.00006436185,0.00025699503,0.00010571943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933904,0.000314542,0.00014107832,0.000080180755,0.000110157576,0.00001497351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002762642,0.00005515595,0.00008961058,0.000027759505,0.0003674318,0.000017528091,0.00014291359,0.000014368771,0.000002932553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052848214,0.000027888764,0.000041866726,0.0001118348,0.0004714706,0.00018939123,0.0000349336,0.00010130919,0.0000044519443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018335882,0.000019582052,0.0038198645,0.000006176244,0.000029197023,2.4179218e-7,0.021660537,0.0000018731666,0.00015933432,0.9715115,0.0023457343,0.000427625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094057707,0.000053248612,0.7467157,0.00019055988,0.00008950434,0.0000038641597,0.022843994,0.0001236314,0.0004474914,0.00083840213,0.22759505,0.00015793984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049006846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007852371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9706731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003226371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021469556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28260255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246600769","doi":"10.1017/s1528887000003177","title":"Kadi and the Role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the International Legal Order","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; European union; Order (exchange); Law; European court of justice; European Union law; International court; International law; Law and economics; Sociology; Public international law; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.015110449421245935,"score_gpt":0.25793497711750396,"score_spread":0.24282452769625804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246600769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4518485,0.00042188866,0.0000023440216,0.0025572896,0.00025607014,0.00022895489,0.000009884022,0.000003254145,0.54467183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913821,0.00008970943,0.00001022374,0.00016701438,0.00023774296,0.0000027083654,5.0900053e-7,0.0000086243435,0.008101368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770445,0.00127256,0.00032572914,0.00010581778,0.00048303982,0.00010842287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987971,0.00027579768,0.00029407258,0.00020084885,0.00041980168,0.0000123698155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00198218,0.000084745196,0.00015771885,0.000029305102,0.00022507805,0.000031476142,0.0008815052,0.000012512808,0.000016191425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034999088,0.00003646205,0.00008581942,0.00008955237,0.0018132675,0.00011680546,0.00029954495,0.0001445909,0.000007047397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015533442,0.000041967094,0.0009827133,0.000015570295,0.00008362162,0.0000010019616,0.008053871,0.000013343142,0.0004110695,0.98757714,0.0025252472,0.00027893367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017026092,0.00010092082,0.64502025,0.00042770244,0.00023423157,0.0000062322206,0.0175612,0.00009611293,0.0016122225,0.005396732,0.3276121,0.00022964727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021798261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9821804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020790345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048016194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66810596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254211692","doi":"10.1017/s1528887000000835","title":"Dealing with Viking and Laval: From Theory to Practice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Liability; Action (physics); Falling (accident); Core (optical fiber); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Psychology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.026990152809254864,"score_gpt":0.31919032446254075,"score_spread":0.2922001716532859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254211692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080766715,0.005830634,0.0002822218,0.002784603,0.00014944846,0.0001537605,0.000009270462,0.000074586285,0.90994877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98619574,0.0019090173,0.0026307572,0.0020140659,0.00049477327,0.0000011457568,8.651509e-7,0.000019577366,0.0067340517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880695,0.00031553322,0.0001863782,0.00022668828,0.00028761596,0.00017681385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906915,0.00036673085,0.00011025425,0.000107812746,0.0002711736,0.00007487393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008571946,0.000118304466,0.00018927292,0.00004515015,0.000319448,0.00005978029,0.00015812932,0.000010164355,0.000005041675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010176838,0.000095772884,0.000030933392,0.00008177728,0.0003038498,0.00022082512,0.00010071555,0.00009487235,0.00004204599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026401508,0.000046824865,0.00051028084,0.0000072501443,0.00031412617,0.00013396173,0.014211379,0.000009584426,0.0008116083,0.96143675,0.0051225154,0.017131694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002433827,0.00031020492,0.021119803,0.00019824093,0.00006854678,0.0000026059176,0.008609296,8.1542845e-7,0.00020990815,0.00019150559,0.9688525,0.0001931672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029668267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007487715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96373004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031109554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021529351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39055046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255122140","doi":"10.1017/s1528887000003190","title":"Beyond the Control Paradigm? International Responsibility and the European Union","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies","topic":"Water Resources and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"European union; International law; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Corporate governance; Human rights; Law and economics; Public international law; Law; International trade; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.01708927267795921,"score_gpt":0.25965767182083516,"score_spread":0.24256839914287595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255122140","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29487103,0.0030743638,0.000040731564,0.027675947,0.00033123017,0.00045906942,0.000014020246,0.00003220574,0.67350143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98615867,0.0005193856,0.000010636375,0.0006612284,0.0005406946,0.0000058307655,5.3732316e-7,0.000012187505,0.012090839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964379,0.0026844353,0.00023287018,0.0001771501,0.00028752364,0.00018012754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990562,0.00040259917,0.00015493728,0.00022287696,0.000119617514,0.000043763535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038893833,0.00010001207,0.0001617491,0.000016545146,0.0004290058,0.0001286672,0.0004206182,0.000010419638,0.000013118507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006200871,0.000052267118,0.000068855734,0.000065103704,0.0019241987,0.00014967889,0.00021395915,0.00013184824,0.00008429274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035733523,0.0001161588,0.016385876,0.00004200066,0.00087965006,0.00006277805,0.062010504,0.000035855686,0.0004592167,0.7421348,0.14256483,0.03495098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011615212,0.000037269652,0.367508,0.000031159812,0.000036072706,0.000002587871,0.0028803523,0.00002527321,0.000016666552,0.0007407836,0.6274415,0.00011879087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014764732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000109950925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74139404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028352215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016111773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.708979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}