{"meta":{"query_hash":"88cea48aed8a","filters":{"venue":"Canadian Class Action Review"},"cohort_total":171,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":171,"exported":171,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/88cea48aed8a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Canadian+Class+Action+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1547302072","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i1.81","title":"Imperfect Information and Conspiracy Class Actions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Imperfect; Perfect information; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Frame (networking); Law and economics; Information asymmetry; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Algorithm; Linguistics; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.02560529321999288,"score_gpt":0.25492715708978314,"score_spread":0.22932186386979025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547302072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028921451,0.19047205,0.022383617,0.24767514,0.0014473177,0.00016204407,0.0006658322,0.00007780351,0.50819474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8504697,0.07384055,0.0045537837,0.040399335,0.0022751421,0.00013587833,0.00021347956,0.00002896774,0.028083103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95949024,0.012872389,0.0015358591,0.002198233,0.018637285,0.0052659875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9386456,0.042117056,0.0067963973,0.0029601704,0.008806022,0.0006747898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02230236,0.00046344593,0.00094362913,0.0034680248,0.005770469,0.010142406,0.0034439038,0.009025571,0.0030788144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054986283,0.0004664764,0.0010384574,0.0037774548,0.016926954,0.0064551844,0.0021814508,0.0071897097,0.00030617914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008954713,0.000006271568,0.0004992004,0.00012072411,0.000021136408,0.00011080771,0.0006788213,0.00089795946,0.000043894044,0.96818984,0.017003775,0.012418624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048554375,0.00003891881,0.008518893,0.0015647312,0.00012306905,0.00024002773,0.0019276565,0.00232694,0.0004898802,0.66727465,0.31733075,0.00011599657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38072208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4054083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38072208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026146548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028460663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75701207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562118918","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i1.41","title":"National Class Actions in Canada: Yet Another Call for Clarity and Coordination","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Jurisdiction; Redress; Class (philosophy); Construct (python library); Political science; CLARITY; Harm; Law and economics; Neglect; Ambiguity; Law; Sociology; State (computer science); Psychology","score_opus":0.07507675715600814,"score_gpt":0.29063499577474367,"score_spread":0.21555823861873552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562118918","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042696174,0.063445605,0.0061522988,0.6150282,0.0031738712,0.00016781101,0.00057839527,0.00014527127,0.26861247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80442476,0.024520893,0.007949361,0.099450156,0.0009787205,0.0001031069,0.00028866512,0.0001106831,0.062173646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775234,0.0032074945,0.000892977,0.0022844255,0.009747505,0.0063441927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971419,0.009773357,0.0015442005,0.0013958946,0.012455992,0.0034115296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018610572,0.00042988182,0.0012088623,0.0037562454,0.025085093,0.027510924,0.0050011408,0.010353934,0.005410553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0313085,0.0005471397,0.0009716215,0.0051474413,0.020965772,0.005596704,0.005960645,0.013350386,0.00029201384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023163448,0.000022024567,0.00243853,0.0002597197,0.0000382578,0.00028046267,0.008884943,0.0008496356,0.00027408803,0.8627485,0.080620445,0.04356028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046418587,0.000025982483,0.014728148,0.0011386913,0.00009384426,0.00012319817,0.01717401,0.001168045,0.0006022238,0.10436204,0.8603443,0.00019306544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9925303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99559516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22898082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22898082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4718674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.894273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261790605","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i1.209","title":"The United States Experience with Competition Class Action Certification: A Comment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Enforcement; Class (philosophy); Competition (biology); Certification; Action (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.0496901022622414,"score_gpt":0.27518986055539557,"score_spread":0.22549975829315416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261790605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012169811,0.0054034996,0.00016296626,0.96485025,0.00831996,0.000022952761,0.00016807379,0.000037390375,0.01981784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014622497,0.0027955659,0.00023639778,0.96595377,0.0031868506,0.000045910474,0.00007073972,0.00003344626,0.013054882],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9714802,0.0046618036,0.001948055,0.0034917193,0.013134826,0.0052833566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9340464,0.034379005,0.0029062866,0.0018047835,0.022698548,0.0041650413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022218172,0.0007452186,0.001179188,0.00195726,0.020847075,0.01356007,0.0064470517,0.060110163,0.008121497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05246511,0.0012458859,0.0016348276,0.005161386,0.011752329,0.007590107,0.004220381,0.044316094,0.0022543073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024683171,0.000013750954,0.0005239087,0.00009274122,0.000010004328,0.00028034978,0.0018042008,0.000038879694,0.00010759996,0.032442648,0.96080184,0.0038594592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020397461,0.000017500382,0.0017066464,0.00029268343,0.000032120694,0.00012769963,0.002045129,0.000057502937,0.00024856022,0.0017581187,0.9936178,0.00007586864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.800519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84939104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.800519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03986387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09338275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40131158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298471142","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v4i1.15","title":"Rethinking the Approval of Class Counsel’s Fees in Ontario Class Actions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Res judicata; Settlement (finance); Law; Incentive; Political science; Legislation; Class (philosophy); Economics; Actuarial science; Business; State (computer science); Finance; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07981463738685277,"score_gpt":0.28110422586311246,"score_spread":0.2012895884762597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298471142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8764447,0.0027700276,0.002494146,0.012957526,0.00014846904,0.0003816597,0.00059614395,0.00005666787,0.10415057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98993087,0.00067597115,0.0012959297,0.0010794924,0.00004839938,0.000037050566,0.000101635436,0.000013693971,0.006816869],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9667226,0.0031761427,0.0015523417,0.0014387195,0.02265239,0.0044578123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9466208,0.023387292,0.008612464,0.001795681,0.017791336,0.0017924609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016912527,0.00018250316,0.00044020597,0.0060333307,0.0066211177,0.0062431195,0.002440872,0.0018704783,0.0021481356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08465436,0.00041633967,0.00042840667,0.0049031507,0.0043349583,0.0014554856,0.0017937296,0.0015003306,0.00021702173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002790259,0.00017303729,0.47259194,0.00052936235,0.00015315964,0.0025011566,0.054647025,0.006229684,0.006234781,0.14411594,0.04558137,0.2669635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005172565,0.00010664144,0.8204151,0.0003117055,0.00012460681,0.00028921393,0.017014379,0.0043204245,0.0026267187,0.0038945705,0.15070589,0.0001390002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92590517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97571576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07409483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07075203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.080682404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5133443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320706894","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v11i2.393","title":"… and Yet so Far? The Utility of the Cy Près Doctrine in Class Proceedings Against the Crown","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Class action; Settlement (finance); Political science; Appeal; Law; Legislation; Economics; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.03258443076726511,"score_gpt":0.2500400612930387,"score_spread":0.21745563052577357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320706894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057509955,0.0041551,0.023997316,0.10216332,0.0017175105,0.00008471909,0.000031701922,0.000060115235,0.8102802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9155816,0.0016088068,0.0033555685,0.014021901,0.00080055464,0.00008516157,0.000015346935,0.00004326872,0.06448768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99443686,0.0016703497,0.00014882434,0.0008858467,0.0020282571,0.00082989584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99616146,0.0019090441,0.00035625984,0.00040502977,0.00094016735,0.0002280301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007356122,0.00024090227,0.00032230528,0.0007940389,0.009651046,0.009958124,0.0014270195,0.0048933006,0.0037822474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014364131,0.00020852928,0.00039324723,0.0007479456,0.037100382,0.007979679,0.004283619,0.010097605,0.00058975234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023352814,0.0000016367339,0.000120109726,0.0000069436883,0.0000012230323,0.000031735406,0.0021526522,0.000038264625,0.000044373264,0.99266523,0.0019536726,0.0029818374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014530949,0.00004378515,0.0018862883,0.0003365765,0.000021192023,0.000133059,0.018061196,0.00059892284,0.0011460638,0.57578003,0.40192547,0.000052877065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070192546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07454378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9298074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009145982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012740406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13956797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739667836","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i1.335","title":"Estimating Damages from Price-Fixing","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Wright; Estimation; Product (mathematics); Government (linguistics); Economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Management; Law; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04566000727133477,"score_gpt":0.2406326891469367,"score_spread":0.19497268187560193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739667836","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10026213,0.01221768,0.8040196,0.0041449983,0.00038509877,0.00048090226,0.0010990475,0.00039120016,0.076999396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8828872,0.01155587,0.0957103,0.00046722274,0.00035814362,0.0002180992,0.0012082017,0.00011416127,0.007480816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885289,0.0032053709,0.0006575761,0.00097361195,0.0061681727,0.00046634022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95258874,0.033382073,0.007380868,0.0028808664,0.003554519,0.00021279391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013395943,0.00096857786,0.001408291,0.008523613,0.00089056016,0.003515064,0.0026030703,0.0024582283,0.004676841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07923572,0.00076011126,0.0013359002,0.0053253463,0.0052813613,0.0057757925,0.0026511676,0.0027363615,0.0006645065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005859747,0.00006247199,0.028875444,0.00066951086,0.00025935035,0.00059303833,0.00051295647,0.24143502,0.0005630931,0.5192519,0.007925259,0.19979338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021448137,0.0001486034,0.036997106,0.0007695277,0.00014616341,0.00094367634,0.0004947708,0.19679701,0.0022964007,0.73329526,0.02790259,0.00018747683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011465473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009423007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013395943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047810813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018451192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070845425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948957947","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i1.045","title":"Catch me if You Can: Resolving Bitcoin Disputes with Class Actions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Blockchain Technology Applications and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cryptocurrency; Context (archaeology); Virtual currency; Harm; Business; Jurisdiction; Computer security; Enforcement; Class (philosophy); Currency; Anonymity; Law and economics; Internet privacy; Commerce; Law; Economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.021479451896367043,"score_gpt":0.25832821698841474,"score_spread":0.2368487650920477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948957947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17878361,0.0017397673,0.17305806,0.12057861,0.0021916186,0.0011075295,0.00022395603,0.0011828139,0.521134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91187745,0.000677937,0.027971886,0.011874106,0.0006629732,0.00031578183,0.0002182558,0.00018434592,0.046217214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831139,0.0070468294,0.0007395092,0.0015847195,0.00495618,0.0025588693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95428437,0.031132191,0.0037366457,0.0039899214,0.004422531,0.002434359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016109055,0.00045426915,0.0005661238,0.0022150835,0.009594211,0.014368418,0.0022785326,0.010770531,0.02172051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07124918,0.00036473453,0.00060381496,0.0017982227,0.009734436,0.016372096,0.010018971,0.008495989,0.003670913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002821917,0.00026611946,0.00599585,0.00014887968,0.00003831555,0.0034377694,0.00866823,0.0033790916,0.0014667206,0.85250825,0.046759635,0.07704891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017306308,0.00019040843,0.0024472382,0.0008394031,0.00007409525,0.0017155532,0.020539932,0.046230726,0.0051158424,0.6196875,0.30280146,0.00018480979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009064819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009483214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02172051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004657289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008017093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08519381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198083187","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i2.009","title":"Flash Boys Class Actions: Civil Fraud, Conspiracy, and the Certifiability of High-Frequency Trading Cases in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Securities Regulation and Market Practices","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"High-frequency trading; Class action; Market manipulation; Enforcement; Securities fraud; Algorithmic trading; Alternative trading system; Business; Capital market; Stock market; Economics; Finance; Law; State (computer science); Political science","score_opus":0.052217711526673,"score_gpt":0.26233559366056525,"score_spread":0.21011788213389226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198083187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6992857,0.0060039097,0.002266015,0.08989494,0.00060738355,0.000409286,0.0013717597,0.000099594785,0.20006141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96790344,0.0022694939,0.0006717878,0.007248732,0.00007559527,0.00002945813,0.00022032432,0.000024814419,0.021556372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99360657,0.0004450547,0.00022304224,0.000546909,0.0028056896,0.0023727184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97842544,0.006883268,0.0023498584,0.00070778676,0.0073819747,0.0042516524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037002587,0.00028700836,0.00032870992,0.003300709,0.020794258,0.0061566522,0.003002942,0.004509786,0.007024539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02262907,0.0004751554,0.00048321922,0.0042657587,0.0065402533,0.0016559504,0.0034893968,0.005706229,0.00028099134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029497518,0.00044114483,0.29944223,0.00040281337,0.00018651187,0.017222637,0.0633333,0.0029490641,0.0013669191,0.3167719,0.18316586,0.114422694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001667124,0.00012590834,0.44549996,0.0011651044,0.00029468542,0.00562087,0.1052756,0.01194252,0.0027163413,0.026771476,0.39993906,0.00048180472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11223917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11223917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19891676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81435597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243841","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v18i1.121","title":"Are Class Actions Progressive? An Enquiry into the Nature and Function of Modern Class Actions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anachronism; Class (philosophy); Proposition; Function (biology); Supreme court; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.050708275690852,"score_gpt":0.2979998407108927,"score_spread":0.24729156502004068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038472235,0.20764187,0.009626854,0.23467818,0.0018498505,0.00006963714,0.00016680406,0.000043604665,0.5074509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84536105,0.11018098,0.003711394,0.015959505,0.0013979904,0.00004012032,0.000089594374,0.000036084934,0.023223251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926702,0.0018086779,0.00024261541,0.0007761413,0.0032585326,0.0012439518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99202526,0.004280277,0.00061754906,0.0005313036,0.0022474043,0.00029820288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011920688,0.00031941608,0.00040008267,0.0033374685,0.0061903256,0.011931724,0.0018039775,0.0034017782,0.002415635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015422423,0.00019154121,0.00030222765,0.0028877861,0.047075737,0.010370755,0.0019874498,0.0049908934,0.0002394283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023494426,0.0000023825478,0.00028979254,0.00006431349,0.0000035025228,0.000020312624,0.0039999685,0.00006122526,0.000038013237,0.9770195,0.003371067,0.015127711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006294862,0.0000117198315,0.006160424,0.0010207534,0.000017723694,0.00007876307,0.014436057,0.00024681148,0.00020769284,0.3866843,0.59109485,0.000034666675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4841008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54754907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5158992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029981486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03296457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.962566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243843","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i2.157","title":"Une Proposition Plus Modeste: Soumissions Bilingues Au Minister de la Justice de Québec Dans the Cadre de Réformes Possible au Régime D’Action Collective","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Tribunal; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.07169375138471744,"score_gpt":0.3659684716094626,"score_spread":0.29427472022474516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243843","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014861821,0.53546464,0.0012265026,0.31747594,0.00553677,0.00026170912,0.0016849445,0.0000518259,0.1234359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43595174,0.35287148,0.0045855227,0.12000297,0.0023469252,0.0005771256,0.0012937847,0.00006900056,0.082301416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98993427,0.0029505773,0.0004205587,0.00076261006,0.0041884696,0.0017434076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982081,0.0061465725,0.0008892212,0.00045013672,0.00934512,0.0010879714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013419647,0.0005734726,0.00088413997,0.0031605691,0.0053363545,0.008145293,0.002252081,0.004272184,0.007920814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019127429,0.00030524065,0.0006658492,0.004664153,0.0059641125,0.0026666755,0.0012811456,0.0047749276,0.0005425758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002156322,0.00006373085,0.0033727447,0.008174199,0.00022594396,0.0002755483,0.0072121783,0.0011227423,0.0010664621,0.49459335,0.35521176,0.12846568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006625813,0.00006506116,0.013714191,0.006523811,0.0002610002,0.000068523776,0.0034509806,0.00025763543,0.00040943242,0.008390736,0.96672386,0.00006847622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96627253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97996897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114193045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.114193045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24029131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8285324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243844","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v18i2.297","title":"Class Actions Related to Police Conduct During Citizen Protests: $6,000,000 Settlement with the City of Montreal","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Equity (law); Class (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Media studies; Law; History; Business; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.05303558900498386,"score_gpt":0.29318390557697344,"score_spread":0.24014831657198957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08717178,0.2899835,0.0011693747,0.24550948,0.013303483,0.0008701565,0.006230892,0.00019392371,0.3555674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62582946,0.19251196,0.0012563202,0.052381814,0.006702353,0.00041147985,0.0035917955,0.00012836482,0.11718647],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910398,0.0010503127,0.00044730146,0.00035027138,0.0050355913,0.002076613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97986996,0.0041052294,0.0024967587,0.00036637185,0.010991791,0.0021698556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007229768,0.0005109522,0.0003829671,0.0062214043,0.008541767,0.005566936,0.0026158863,0.0040774876,0.003502067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020906702,0.00040512302,0.00054202916,0.00611018,0.0031078705,0.00079492806,0.0017321678,0.0034231546,0.00046470715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014454492,0.00016982702,0.021200966,0.0024688193,0.00018376624,0.001171154,0.011833844,0.0012645448,0.00089238794,0.03013289,0.76162285,0.16891442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033479686,0.00008481221,0.12878889,0.0015830108,0.00017037075,0.0001604685,0.0067763445,0.00013771883,0.00056355615,0.00074841414,0.86084753,0.000105436826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9592187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98454326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04758305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04758305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09855581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34524083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243845","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v18i1.97","title":"Pre-Certification Motions that Dispose of or Limit the Issues at Trial: Six Factors for Judges to Consider","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Plaintiff; Dispose pattern; Law; Political science; Computer science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.17952672805259093,"score_gpt":0.3478639290946511,"score_spread":0.16833720104206015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23047167,0.015197292,0.07113582,0.28161138,0.0041681523,0.0017883993,0.00021012001,0.00079040026,0.39462677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8863266,0.0055221952,0.02540784,0.04048717,0.0010159549,0.0004543939,0.00007628903,0.0001348128,0.040574726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9702967,0.005587493,0.0030676527,0.002531829,0.01107102,0.0074454057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9624408,0.024683587,0.002280588,0.0010185263,0.0071706777,0.002405872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030630777,0.00056286115,0.00061359437,0.0013537935,0.01751155,0.0106313,0.0028472848,0.011188214,0.0032000535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057287633,0.0013620341,0.0008479059,0.0010909458,0.01548334,0.006151097,0.0028242413,0.013712256,0.0007774253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114768685,0.00020594825,0.010037136,0.0004232463,0.000030471754,0.002467045,0.050633423,0.002628208,0.0055326843,0.7547194,0.091148,0.08205969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034238896,0.0006281297,0.029906936,0.0019164594,0.00019126733,0.0010254997,0.07387368,0.004016447,0.007891336,0.22665627,0.65274346,0.0008082358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2040116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4955037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7959884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026487537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08709194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4056483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243847","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v18i2.233","title":"L’autorisation D’actions Collectives Mondiales au Canada : Deux Solitudes Aux Antipodes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jurisdiction; Tribunal; Petitioner; Political science; Law; Class (philosophy); Authorization; Supreme court","score_opus":0.084940119584619,"score_gpt":0.3018775754107592,"score_spread":0.2169374558261402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1937568,0.018953571,0.012852599,0.07458907,0.002710281,0.000167954,0.0007884788,0.00040178528,0.69577944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7305626,0.0030087347,0.0037981756,0.00590819,0.00034043248,0.00007067274,0.00013354674,0.00009071383,0.2560869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926645,0.0007600446,0.00012558569,0.00088976295,0.0033023066,0.002257818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962442,0.00095655385,0.00021138106,0.0002683484,0.0014506541,0.00086881977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037173582,0.0007608815,0.00054521085,0.0013834712,0.017551918,0.00983454,0.0014704255,0.0036602586,0.01671804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059834574,0.0005607562,0.0010304025,0.0014603267,0.008343804,0.001979569,0.003031711,0.006495977,0.0010996374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011987082,0.000047087626,0.0064388937,0.00014521476,0.00005104396,0.00086522,0.013396719,0.0006907029,0.0018757154,0.8286677,0.08595461,0.061747205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034681343,0.000034184483,0.020970844,0.00017488965,0.000030751326,0.00039327136,0.006580588,0.00093785266,0.0015163779,0.007173026,0.9620727,0.00008093708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9740369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9823094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09224658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09224658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.093507335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6692989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243850","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v18i1.53","title":"Early Disposition or Prejudicial Attrition? An Analysis of Bill 161 and Pre-Certification Dispositive Motions in Class Actions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Certification; Class action; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Waiver; Class (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06517035933986665,"score_gpt":0.31007754579666846,"score_spread":0.24490718645680182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9685236,0.0003643225,0.0003762548,0.0013151044,0.000008910649,0.000057565747,0.00022035386,0.000006681186,0.029127222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99115455,0.00027334722,0.00011016076,0.00031160185,0.000016359545,0.00003159059,0.00027911732,0.0000070628425,0.007816189],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99190944,0.0011179057,0.00029707755,0.0004144579,0.0030738395,0.0031872361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97374064,0.0087326495,0.010253954,0.0011954309,0.0041048783,0.0019724753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068988544,0.000129489,0.0005285832,0.0027327517,0.0053866724,0.0036075534,0.0013848474,0.0013443506,0.007401024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034121957,0.00029585892,0.0005823533,0.0036415604,0.0034311137,0.0022595956,0.0028625724,0.0026416807,0.001006576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003560694,0.00039011476,0.85498977,0.00007846619,0.00004079423,0.0007624008,0.023842938,0.0015667614,0.00034726472,0.071069986,0.004027915,0.042527564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002495301,0.00020553984,0.94687617,0.00014436345,0.000038940474,0.00011198915,0.027512167,0.0018986383,0.00023423563,0.0056107286,0.017303273,0.00003906288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30289912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4662387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6971009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013842114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0129681025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6022721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243851","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v18i2.201","title":"Time for Change: Advancing the Objectives of Class Actions by Removing the “Residency Requirement” from British Columbia’s <i>Class Proceedings Act</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Class action; Class (philosophy); Multinational corporation; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.04377833322512863,"score_gpt":0.2784079865437274,"score_spread":0.23462965331859875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09004819,0.0024999261,0.010069761,0.13122128,0.0014233951,0.00032452558,0.00014867097,0.00022511889,0.76403916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76490915,0.0013687833,0.009198778,0.07185489,0.0003626083,0.00023847223,0.0001538938,0.00013499829,0.1517784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98321575,0.0025616274,0.0004756987,0.0014713528,0.0066270283,0.005648443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830845,0.0045139366,0.0011165304,0.0012059985,0.005843301,0.004235672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01081527,0.0002974785,0.00028847795,0.0016911655,0.01778348,0.016073665,0.0026763894,0.0062936884,0.0069009685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02779565,0.00036487204,0.00038226895,0.0009995978,0.012596431,0.004582878,0.006201392,0.00899265,0.0011559222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005052983,0.00012190011,0.009038749,0.0001296252,0.000018885868,0.0005565917,0.033449262,0.00077852077,0.0015050494,0.70460826,0.123888984,0.12585367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039859933,0.000073765856,0.021139555,0.0005608836,0.000052395146,0.00018667577,0.0235211,0.0007609659,0.0013319352,0.045558326,0.9066593,0.00011519246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78718096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9119157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21281904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038026586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18294646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4281447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243855","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v18i1.5","title":"Simplifying Access to Justice: Michael Eizenga Publishes <i>the Class Actions Handbook</i>, an Essential, Multi-Jurisdictional Resource for Canadian Jurists","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Resource (disambiguation); Class (philosophy); Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10527926338364928,"score_gpt":0.34506674001048976,"score_spread":0.23978747662684047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243855","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005143534,0.058799114,0.0014358938,0.6934997,0.09543755,0.00013926368,0.0006052019,0.00036347454,0.14920542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012686614,0.058157478,0.0025274518,0.2424542,0.024117144,0.0001391843,0.0005991654,0.0007743002,0.65854454],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792756,0.0012812107,0.00052721926,0.0012994212,0.015411162,0.002205385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855457,0.0032423313,0.0003623796,0.0004572357,0.008534158,0.0018582761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009148207,0.0009627219,0.00083048496,0.0036143472,0.014259564,0.015774911,0.0027498102,0.011484955,0.015007338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027308846,0.0009316879,0.0006378283,0.0035423674,0.0071710097,0.005783478,0.0032970132,0.012730078,0.0065354095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014310101,0.000002957175,0.000022010101,0.000026837544,0.0000014449057,0.000009139648,0.00011576347,0.000016304997,0.000029888093,0.010107282,0.98271185,0.0069550416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017180039,0.0000012653254,0.00014984742,0.000065677974,0.000002733637,0.000009230382,0.00012120843,0.000020784033,0.00006828771,0.0015366075,0.99801254,0.000010079596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8168498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89985657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18315017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047399253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.104094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3684575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243870","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v18i2.171","title":"The Precarious State of the <i>Ragoonanan</i> Principle in Ontario","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Supreme court; Estate; Law; Cause of action; State action; State (computer science); Action (physics); Political science; Class (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Doctrine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04060364899206685,"score_gpt":0.24260411392247525,"score_spread":0.2020004649304084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07674461,0.024153195,0.0043999203,0.14986706,0.0016796367,0.00031852344,0.0010679342,0.0001319686,0.7416371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76358366,0.013947128,0.003363918,0.037142467,0.00040636366,0.000093487884,0.00030049254,0.00009041105,0.1810721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891739,0.00068781443,0.00039432917,0.0011751228,0.0058047962,0.0027640285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901158,0.0019343795,0.00090858125,0.00046963527,0.0052532842,0.0013182305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051056836,0.00022913676,0.00033678018,0.0012570777,0.013711599,0.008303366,0.001657209,0.0029348473,0.004280039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011554173,0.000664133,0.00045958135,0.0022476066,0.008993878,0.0017505585,0.0019122863,0.0040905224,0.00038635815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007177746,0.00002162925,0.008016818,0.00055896473,0.000046387537,0.0009257833,0.014345752,0.00048443527,0.0020953934,0.76409054,0.16505566,0.044286776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025638717,0.00002197304,0.025029834,0.0003135654,0.000043510772,0.00011971117,0.0026626054,0.00023118922,0.0006732422,0.0097240545,0.9610648,0.000089914014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99090064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12388974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12388974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2284782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89888716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243876","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i2.035","title":"Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: “Some Basis in Fact” and the Certification of Common Issues","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Certification; Law; Proposition; Basis (linear algebra); Jurisprudence; Class (philosophy); Supreme court; Test (biology); Common law; Legislation; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0829923196441618,"score_gpt":0.3618721441761079,"score_spread":0.2788798245319461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243876","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0514172,0.073588714,0.07738342,0.4943789,0.0058895624,0.00043519173,0.00016455942,0.00010713652,0.2966353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8416464,0.0220438,0.026947275,0.07877904,0.0019895744,0.00013690312,0.0000884095,0.00007798548,0.02829063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97275555,0.010306711,0.0011871427,0.0022658692,0.011148857,0.0023359268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9440322,0.036847975,0.0036744433,0.0023466006,0.011800732,0.0012979617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021880828,0.00037624457,0.00063795777,0.0054124314,0.0067009046,0.0145932445,0.0022038396,0.010328474,0.0039324006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04014426,0.00061201426,0.0011773289,0.0021064407,0.039507553,0.014255355,0.0037124853,0.0141594345,0.00061632274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010089639,0.000015381942,0.00064580917,0.0001235992,0.000011065934,0.00022446952,0.0020571253,0.00018341595,0.00017583312,0.9728143,0.009382518,0.014356265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024435789,0.00008604721,0.004930533,0.002584344,0.00007301701,0.00056810386,0.0073268823,0.001443523,0.0019589288,0.62824607,0.35261732,0.00014079874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.080067776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12099097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91993225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018466076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0338496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15920347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243888","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i1.011","title":"Addressing Systemic Abuse in Quebec Long-Term Care Homes: The Class Action Solution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Punitive damages; Context (archaeology); Collective action; Plaintiff; Class action; Economic Justice; Population; Action (physics); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Geography; Politics; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.19462135941502529,"score_gpt":0.47006645934571034,"score_spread":0.27544509993068506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243888","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011013224,0.6905091,0.00082210475,0.22829317,0.0046979445,0.00024119939,0.00033938547,0.000035058358,0.06404884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31037667,0.55354387,0.0030644182,0.10315703,0.0024928837,0.00028367044,0.00038741555,0.00003500288,0.026659066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916841,0.0026329386,0.00035529112,0.00036166277,0.0033110885,0.0016550036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9675812,0.007887656,0.0017905774,0.0005967299,0.019737191,0.0024065182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015977988,0.0005138989,0.0006263464,0.0030223844,0.0060567698,0.006110716,0.0033353043,0.0048477785,0.0055051423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020672467,0.00027058777,0.00082106935,0.003418694,0.005395642,0.0017577593,0.0018548612,0.0044162287,0.0003661076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011153532,0.0001807673,0.005569708,0.011284427,0.00019885093,0.00062064757,0.0058855424,0.0009363629,0.00059067155,0.13009019,0.4381237,0.40640765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006936039,0.00012073892,0.015762184,0.01724875,0.0002075339,0.00019110662,0.004262659,0.00026472876,0.00029361912,0.002410567,0.9591025,0.000066196524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9643189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085314505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.085314505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2712933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61900294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243889","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i2.069","title":"An Examination of the Viability of a Class Action for Adverse Events Following Covid-19 Immunizations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Class action; Procurement; Action (physics); Certification; Immunization; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Adverse effect; Class (philosophy); Political science; Medicine; Business; Law; Immunology; Computer science; State (computer science); Pharmacology","score_opus":0.056958756201114645,"score_gpt":0.31965927187095333,"score_spread":0.2627005156698387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24108054,0.023337612,0.008814673,0.13924864,0.0017675303,0.0010956901,0.0008107353,0.00009175298,0.5837529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95794946,0.0053152023,0.0023766216,0.020142293,0.0005240698,0.00016628423,0.00015873415,0.000022157046,0.013345243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90761817,0.018933963,0.00463483,0.004603205,0.053337213,0.010872725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64599836,0.27532732,0.021343667,0.00512408,0.049305543,0.0029009937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10061217,0.00046697422,0.00071124017,0.0099030975,0.017455924,0.018317187,0.004925683,0.013710605,0.0057975664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18220332,0.0006984017,0.0013066087,0.0062911743,0.017259454,0.0058309976,0.004620748,0.01342394,0.00057291123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000317849,0.00024784196,0.042592566,0.0013269297,0.0001754082,0.0022203408,0.034190763,0.0013981356,0.0010042934,0.77169216,0.05481058,0.09002312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029099864,0.00078679255,0.17011355,0.0082994625,0.0015027509,0.0019552987,0.083502434,0.00790433,0.008155074,0.1409226,0.57587117,0.00069553795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4385125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54555637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5614875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045828562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07381541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87192017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243900","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i2.141","title":"A More Modest Proposal: Bilingual Submissions Made to the Quebec Minister of Justice in the Context of Possible Reforms to the Class Action Regime","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Civil procedure; Law; Economic Justice; Authorization; Class (philosophy); Political science; Certification; Christian ministry; Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Sociology; Computer science; Computer security; History","score_opus":0.054530453903416744,"score_gpt":0.31264440184244136,"score_spread":0.2581139479390246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02360603,0.0024782135,0.005868189,0.7593133,0.014360251,0.0009815929,0.00071543123,0.00029005972,0.19238693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29038873,0.0012096997,0.012874755,0.43272933,0.004730981,0.00062359706,0.00026731918,0.00018117706,0.2569944],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97065955,0.0075160703,0.0009308422,0.0035126065,0.009384654,0.007996295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9628338,0.011631332,0.000959052,0.001726264,0.018312555,0.0045368387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024498986,0.0008723567,0.0006362467,0.0018736012,0.02178042,0.017845111,0.004543594,0.034067616,0.016941322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05371898,0.000672398,0.0013755104,0.0013505593,0.010899988,0.0061450806,0.003938304,0.018712146,0.0024961731],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027290505,0.000111468704,0.0031581656,0.00021637396,0.000043046635,0.0018357055,0.010648693,0.0005657729,0.002726167,0.4544923,0.5065381,0.019391308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020484961,0.00015671458,0.0054009976,0.00041471428,0.00008158579,0.00040426766,0.008343657,0.0013827528,0.0018192227,0.022168113,0.95921963,0.00040352752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7943084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87865424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20569158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05086289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14473265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41380584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243901","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i1.109","title":"Revisiting Class Counsel Fee Approvals: Towards Presumptive Validity of Contingency Fee Agreements","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Civil procedure; Law; Settlement (finance); Statutory law; Class (philosophy); Political science; Business; Computer science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.09226277825083468,"score_gpt":0.30618981095151215,"score_spread":0.21392703270067748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20807242,0.005123425,0.11432231,0.066325665,0.0012957791,0.00073278433,0.00033148698,0.0002697211,0.6035265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623009,0.0009683412,0.015420669,0.003536818,0.00027400014,0.000076875695,0.00007395693,0.000043601063,0.017304812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9579934,0.010833979,0.0025146299,0.002524289,0.02291289,0.003220845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9103782,0.05208188,0.007344144,0.0054792273,0.023667317,0.0010492161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030011648,0.00025922744,0.00042241346,0.0031122214,0.0072347503,0.013291105,0.0036273163,0.005243695,0.005698662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10654852,0.00081640156,0.00045242405,0.0019244627,0.013962182,0.008131813,0.0040677665,0.009046068,0.00080630067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056864625,0.00004312949,0.009662406,0.00019944357,0.000013373896,0.000996027,0.014768874,0.0014672364,0.0011037502,0.9018704,0.011171183,0.05864738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112571695,0.0002394559,0.043815978,0.003375686,0.0001458432,0.0013437191,0.02827267,0.02333943,0.012379582,0.4059852,0.48064277,0.0003470814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22337122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.326895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7766288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029362375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043339398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4441421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243903","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i2.003","title":"Fair Compensation or Unjustified Temptation to Compromise?: An Empirical Review of Requests for Honorarium Awards in Canadian Class Actions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Compromise; Compensation (psychology); Payment; Temptation; Class (philosophy); Economic Justice; Law; Action (physics); Empirical research; Conflict of interest; Political science; Public relations; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.21982134167779294,"score_gpt":0.46766112993700404,"score_spread":0.2478397882592111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5824306,0.28211525,0.00179218,0.022729073,0.0005298803,0.0009339288,0.0041028825,0.000030013938,0.10533628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94382757,0.05105774,0.000878155,0.0017022999,0.0000789806,0.00011688171,0.00040439743,0.000021690046,0.0019122734],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9510277,0.007890746,0.004022007,0.0023111668,0.03226569,0.0024827474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6571669,0.19186792,0.052570865,0.004324429,0.090150185,0.0039196447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04523768,0.00034039284,0.00090632954,0.017478421,0.0073882565,0.008953884,0.003161651,0.0016853365,0.004835549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19885486,0.0005388126,0.00071572815,0.031709567,0.008814711,0.0030352713,0.002089112,0.0022571008,0.00024910353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004792317,0.00028261452,0.42362866,0.019885192,0.0008210089,0.0011589455,0.10982839,0.000895137,0.00053386454,0.06466642,0.038929533,0.33889094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049429505,0.00010546408,0.73249656,0.018269118,0.0011064687,0.00036849783,0.07675917,0.000753994,0.0006865959,0.0021051452,0.16708349,0.00021607534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9409803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97818327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098841935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.098841935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18317029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71715176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243910","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i2.175","title":"Class Actions, Workplace Harassment, and Discrimination Disputes: A Case Study of <i>Lewis V Westjet Airlines Ltd</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Jurisdiction; Class action; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Settlement (finance); Sociology; Public relations; Law; Business; Finance; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.06994926728292193,"score_gpt":0.2901871090923979,"score_spread":0.22023784180947598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93609965,0.0020287547,0.0010885721,0.01881092,0.00025042653,0.00035416373,0.00009480114,0.00001995962,0.041252848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799635,0.0019632622,0.0010917528,0.006029318,0.00015662337,0.00016293432,0.00004138407,0.00002530192,0.010565889],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932439,0.0031754908,0.00020462729,0.00035687358,0.0010387838,0.0019804304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941071,0.0030328368,0.0007472858,0.00020977155,0.0004175338,0.0014854341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005969073,0.00077027007,0.0006499224,0.0026257306,0.04302017,0.007609678,0.0032993474,0.011628708,0.0062419157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008611318,0.00108073,0.0011046844,0.0027752393,0.008414553,0.003764294,0.007592902,0.011073367,0.00070248765],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018913511,0.003089745,0.043540437,0.00038871236,0.00007517201,0.28841296,0.5519675,0.00063019915,0.0009597017,0.05985592,0.02688633,0.024004228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009330713,0.0005512907,0.015993785,0.000643051,0.0000664605,0.056951027,0.8434423,0.0010290203,0.0007610239,0.003822946,0.076521605,0.0001242489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13308828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29328954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8669117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015476095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009702999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26462728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243923","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i1.157","title":"A Wrench in the Social Justice Toolbox: Assessing the Constitutional Class Action as a Tool for Addressing Racial Discrimination","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Racial profiling; Charter; Certification; Class action; Profiling (computer programming); Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Computer science; Race (biology)","score_opus":0.23614461289656694,"score_gpt":0.47982218160432744,"score_spread":0.2436775687077605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243923","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06565012,0.46055117,0.012031496,0.1998447,0.003879287,0.0012391723,0.0010215039,0.00010891906,0.25567362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81144327,0.13192824,0.017124789,0.024746664,0.0009086778,0.000506814,0.00036575078,0.000052310275,0.012923491],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9587785,0.018693855,0.0013927219,0.0012154443,0.017751057,0.002168462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8873072,0.05139687,0.0071839835,0.002294271,0.048398092,0.0034196095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054176345,0.0006423812,0.00090632564,0.01530583,0.009358458,0.010614156,0.0029308046,0.0024603372,0.004145385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09391592,0.00041094588,0.0008761717,0.009382165,0.014692102,0.004166792,0.0034657235,0.0037731922,0.0003237132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012473579,0.00021220256,0.035426464,0.0069932244,0.00025326465,0.00020227683,0.011397152,0.0009908967,0.00037671436,0.33062267,0.08148095,0.5319194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010632803,0.00056733954,0.20289254,0.045834184,0.0013871513,0.00020447218,0.032927427,0.0030763822,0.0015873775,0.060188487,0.6508971,0.00033123122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85585934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.946735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14414066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06657314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17820704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48302424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243930","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i2.101","title":"Unchartered Grounds: Covid-19 and Class Actions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Damages; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Political science; Charter; Government (linguistics); Law; Certification; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.17310998654147897,"score_gpt":0.40800666870288205,"score_spread":0.23489668216140308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1826707,0.003117571,0.0073691383,0.04551476,0.00051630614,0.0001732224,0.00030886166,0.00010158205,0.7602278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96205515,0.00077847386,0.0007010967,0.0046664043,0.00008407068,0.000019448902,0.00006206804,0.00003350006,0.03159985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98639524,0.0013535249,0.0003075046,0.0013004128,0.0053456523,0.005297705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803782,0.006141743,0.0025286693,0.0010962319,0.0067327595,0.0031223113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067988937,0.00030584278,0.00035095296,0.0025887424,0.024098115,0.013696105,0.0022645732,0.0067761093,0.014712589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023240348,0.00045147698,0.00051095075,0.0025239703,0.025075482,0.0033238495,0.004774812,0.010550907,0.0006483918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003353568,0.00006237823,0.021928001,0.00006498583,0.000015569325,0.00095011736,0.015463799,0.0004812961,0.0002393157,0.90479034,0.022300595,0.033670016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048476297,0.00012674466,0.0992356,0.0012834324,0.00013537306,0.0008714959,0.052508034,0.002498825,0.002457661,0.16739401,0.6730943,0.0003460712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91166943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.953646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08833057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073881455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09651278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53604996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243935","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v14i2.467","title":"How Class Actions have Shaped Litigation Financing Law in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Business; Class action; Economic Justice; Law; Jurisprudence; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.05444920155557106,"score_gpt":0.2250137708868608,"score_spread":0.17056456933128974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5306589,0.019391853,0.0039695376,0.14655215,0.0006035907,0.00034857172,0.0020306006,0.00013936096,0.29630533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97289115,0.00305404,0.0007004915,0.0051294873,0.0001019579,0.00003814833,0.00016129045,0.000035810666,0.017887546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853565,0.0014308603,0.00034580866,0.0011546132,0.006015383,0.005696807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.956647,0.01345925,0.0034015696,0.0009262431,0.018783847,0.006782057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011627864,0.00025812845,0.000557321,0.0062064924,0.016249325,0.01773487,0.0030898934,0.0036343532,0.008874534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037292957,0.00056234933,0.0006060907,0.007570206,0.010481052,0.0021198804,0.0037928591,0.0050678737,0.00027439135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010888536,0.00008203295,0.06955209,0.00025685088,0.00008803236,0.00072548335,0.018877637,0.0025613771,0.0007242998,0.7935682,0.05052627,0.06292883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119454926,0.00008722597,0.36040488,0.0013106769,0.00026923048,0.00021935489,0.0290826,0.006773972,0.0013637296,0.054545023,0.5454191,0.00040482727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99519014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32661405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.32661405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33315223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78103226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244027","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i1.075","title":"Trends in Environmental Class Actions in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"International Environmental Law and Policies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Redress; Harm; Class (philosophy); Variety (cybernetics); Pleading; Law and economics; Action (physics); Certification; Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.016253050035022112,"score_gpt":0.24046446187395001,"score_spread":0.2242114118389279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42085862,0.07519856,0.0021880462,0.19226712,0.0016490113,0.0005715663,0.011182265,0.00027308043,0.29581177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9261195,0.024852078,0.0011945262,0.015631866,0.00023031495,0.00008797134,0.0024887566,0.000067150046,0.029327886],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9763672,0.0008010741,0.0009088403,0.0015559803,0.015638448,0.0047285967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90055496,0.009960916,0.008530967,0.0011659531,0.07190929,0.007877982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0119316885,0.00031523217,0.0005552285,0.013435257,0.011112614,0.011669801,0.0038551255,0.003327975,0.0064761606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029731374,0.0005261264,0.00063181133,0.020486718,0.0050960383,0.0018676716,0.0027756735,0.004397964,0.0003330415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021904567,0.0002743361,0.26337188,0.0023033211,0.00020991518,0.00097443827,0.03143183,0.001994503,0.00177736,0.2285946,0.2140553,0.25479358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022606719,0.000064475214,0.45213813,0.0010769475,0.00010415646,0.00017742517,0.018138604,0.0009782378,0.0009892712,0.0027057875,0.52346253,0.00014180403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23571213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23571213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34704438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8864656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244033","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i1.053","title":"The Short End of the Stick: Bolstering Legal Protections for Short Sellers in Ontario’s Secondary Market","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Issuer; Redress; Secondary market; Business; Position (finance); Enforcement; Statute; Investment banking; Security market; Law; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.059395177767649965,"score_gpt":0.32493786469464064,"score_spread":0.2655426869269907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082847156,0.15463293,0.007245667,0.21770705,0.003144058,0.0005167059,0.0010291337,0.00011566038,0.53276163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7477573,0.08017084,0.0064512542,0.02808215,0.0012299584,0.00014772448,0.00043616103,0.00004043422,0.1356842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943317,0.0007755809,0.0003040763,0.00032404548,0.0033991334,0.00086539215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851614,0.0039807265,0.0016350196,0.0005489223,0.007663694,0.0010102945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006402077,0.00021308413,0.00031656967,0.002159515,0.0044871196,0.0039170035,0.0016825492,0.002728646,0.003483729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011613334,0.00024397657,0.00040828125,0.0020723774,0.00535937,0.0015217548,0.0011924442,0.0018566392,0.00032119668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095703166,0.000057568937,0.009231621,0.0022203864,0.000051797542,0.0010123701,0.010901196,0.0010602224,0.0014814573,0.6181526,0.18167056,0.1740645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025294876,0.000046121157,0.015058964,0.0016389494,0.00005994562,0.00011501938,0.0015250901,0.00039454427,0.0005946519,0.01211547,0.96839327,0.000032657485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9134355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9585729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08656448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053394847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13869253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38740855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244037","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v14i2.315","title":"Access to Justice Versus Freedom of Contract: A Comparative Analysis of Canada and us Enforcement of Mandatory Arbitration Agreements and Class Action Waivers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Arbitration; Class action; Plaintiff; Law; Enforcement; Political science; Legislature; Compulsory arbitration; Legislation; Civil procedure; Dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Freedom of contract; Business; Law and economics; Economics; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.055588030676915125,"score_gpt":0.30458595568127445,"score_spread":0.24899792500435933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7215797,0.017242238,0.00077432976,0.012923305,0.00015117017,0.000178131,0.0014690785,0.00002744512,0.24565467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877028,0.0043334262,0.00025901524,0.0009883867,0.00003092735,0.000023632223,0.0004135268,0.000012966654,0.0062353658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886897,0.0010109448,0.00027547852,0.0004309053,0.006536852,0.0030561532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96785516,0.009092546,0.0041554263,0.00047811287,0.016577441,0.0018412723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058657527,0.00017095247,0.0004460976,0.007165523,0.0068243234,0.0065898625,0.0014754097,0.0010947781,0.003909732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029166704,0.00023675937,0.0005389906,0.013803055,0.004480108,0.001062235,0.0015922178,0.001522932,0.00015708836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000733463,0.0003382957,0.44184324,0.0009837328,0.0005002916,0.0012840888,0.034680188,0.0038579782,0.00095804944,0.29398414,0.05445053,0.16638596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006871964,0.00010722525,0.8051046,0.00085300155,0.00051961973,0.0001803019,0.04214424,0.002131644,0.00079755107,0.003282997,0.14468351,0.00012658631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99787736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092918456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.092918456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15535784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6741737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244038","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i1.201","title":"Understanding Class Actions Through A Historical Overview and Empirical Data from Quebec from the Past Twenty-Five Years","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Empirical research; New class; Social class; Class formation; Compensation (psychology); Sociology; History; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; State (computer science); Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.36795400047362653,"score_gpt":0.3169531767538016,"score_spread":0.05100082371982495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6273063,0.1306954,0.0046955515,0.019460274,0.00043336704,0.00027478018,0.060546555,0.0001997137,0.15638813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9246507,0.03794733,0.001804914,0.0013617632,0.00013766836,0.00007378603,0.010758113,0.0000751221,0.023190578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755365,0.00027284614,0.00012805738,0.00035223304,0.0012614593,0.0004316981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833524,0.002599475,0.0020026597,0.0003511797,0.010682045,0.0010122915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003179425,0.00034760885,0.0003864843,0.009606122,0.0035158177,0.0031594604,0.0013760967,0.0006505691,0.007409232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076074023,0.00024552067,0.00033640763,0.018322384,0.0016349272,0.0013306931,0.0008796837,0.0010824739,0.0005327249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016253989,0.00013813577,0.554051,0.0013526705,0.00026218663,0.0009427613,0.021354517,0.002340995,0.0006170692,0.024508351,0.10982794,0.28444192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042358392,0.00002636754,0.7919439,0.00064050773,0.00005465211,0.0001079041,0.0051076203,0.00082685467,0.00023225608,0.00032870393,0.20067757,0.00004951558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06940284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06940284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049514405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50355524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244041","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i1.111","title":"Class Actions and Beauty Pageants: The Need for Carriage Motion Reform in Ontario","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carriage; Arbitrariness; Class (philosophy); Law; Prejudice (legal term); Law and economics; Opt-out; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Advertising; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05166718948407666,"score_gpt":0.2620847480961143,"score_spread":0.21041755861203765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244041","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105819054,0.12377646,0.0021853808,0.43838012,0.002506438,0.00056330784,0.0011597823,0.00009181381,0.32551768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7785239,0.057711177,0.004010349,0.04263002,0.0011267179,0.00019124935,0.00051151164,0.00005347058,0.11524158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891262,0.0011766719,0.00054878154,0.0006285544,0.0060050427,0.0025147726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686847,0.0070971153,0.0023656972,0.00076864706,0.017802592,0.0032812753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010660037,0.00022356574,0.000459655,0.0027452088,0.010690196,0.009978496,0.0028400577,0.0056768483,0.0068185795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021184605,0.00041308312,0.00045789583,0.0038990371,0.006239689,0.0025670242,0.0019211913,0.0035497013,0.0003728532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001531643,0.000090952264,0.013985888,0.0024201546,0.00006720402,0.0011337737,0.014603737,0.0019361449,0.0015794609,0.5500916,0.26017788,0.15376005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004070154,0.00003833695,0.02853182,0.0011617253,0.00007562595,0.00009540915,0.0048237136,0.00053771737,0.00052568153,0.0062635783,0.95783514,0.00007048798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9862672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16400579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16400579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34142542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9696348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244048","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v14i2.391","title":"Certifiable: Can a Class Action Address Canada’s On-Reserve Drinking Water Crisis?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Context (archaeology); Tort; Certification; Indigenous; Political science; Collective action; Action (physics); Work (physics); Criticism; Public administration; Law and economics; Public relations; Business; Law; Sociology; Liability; State (computer science); Politics; Geography; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.049339191635609264,"score_gpt":0.26148920756749144,"score_spread":0.21215001593188218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244048","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031442396,0.012104038,0.004016114,0.47332636,0.0060437596,0.0005377623,0.0005955836,0.00028254077,0.47165135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6039096,0.008828148,0.005147179,0.15122694,0.0021230537,0.0002262367,0.0004198893,0.0001841215,0.2279349],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822036,0.0018030563,0.00042976922,0.0010480278,0.008849181,0.0056664846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96672165,0.008354983,0.0012713539,0.0010035296,0.018771626,0.0038768873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018604232,0.0004357155,0.00042620482,0.0032524618,0.016687967,0.017494453,0.0041827844,0.013506273,0.012406128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05145545,0.00035025322,0.00058022747,0.0020948679,0.010796243,0.004046463,0.0031092626,0.008281285,0.0012684333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042729607,0.00006818925,0.004595469,0.00031538025,0.000023997016,0.00058292516,0.006116078,0.0006356182,0.0006811999,0.43919295,0.48292226,0.06482321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023205544,0.00002911477,0.005459413,0.0007337494,0.000046364305,0.00008110816,0.0051030684,0.0006260426,0.0007847161,0.014358748,0.972669,0.000085425156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9318031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9508583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06819689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06776235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25720158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4916526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244049","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i2.085","title":"<i>L’oratoire Saint-Joseph du Mont-Royal V JJ</i> and the Growing Complexity of Quebec’s Authorization Criteria","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Law; Supreme court; SAINT; Expansive; Authorization; Political science; Context (archaeology); Class action; Sociology; State (computer science); History; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.10122455447083115,"score_gpt":0.33173791158624116,"score_spread":0.23051335711541002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244049","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024006197,0.033259578,0.0027743268,0.6869722,0.005375973,0.0002210683,0.0014526988,0.00011556586,0.24582238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48737562,0.012207709,0.004360319,0.41190544,0.0037978499,0.00017952,0.00050502527,0.00013898026,0.07952947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9742361,0.0057076816,0.0012808635,0.002205822,0.011646058,0.004923406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93917304,0.030538933,0.002347097,0.0015843979,0.02387788,0.0024787001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026297526,0.00053720444,0.00084604317,0.0040147486,0.016400032,0.01433049,0.0051517524,0.014279899,0.0069969445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041211948,0.00073504064,0.0012805308,0.0037335039,0.0122244675,0.0029718124,0.0020977128,0.014267857,0.00093458453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090725356,0.000029525198,0.005957904,0.00046793098,0.000107493535,0.0011161672,0.005211954,0.0006079099,0.0005508518,0.37110463,0.5945412,0.020213688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008822419,0.000041703774,0.021405466,0.0016644088,0.0001677786,0.0003627306,0.0041797208,0.0011168362,0.0010683006,0.022348477,0.94723904,0.0003172555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9807593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99030125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10240683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10240683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13079336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.743017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244051","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i2.127","title":"Crown Immunity in Class Proceedings: The Injustice of Barring Institutional Historical Abuse Claims","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Sovereign immunity; Legislation; Political science; Liability; Redress; Class action; Supreme court; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.07469835458697197,"score_gpt":0.3140843348932329,"score_spread":0.23938598030626093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3400159,0.002200607,0.008658821,0.013853378,0.0002994845,0.00017649663,0.00007141583,0.00009167185,0.63463223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98567736,0.0004452918,0.0007193266,0.0014166354,0.000080044854,0.000026858861,0.000013793845,0.000011168019,0.011609576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98942065,0.002116887,0.00038713202,0.0008811185,0.0033541468,0.0038402085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98203135,0.008325605,0.0024669513,0.001786661,0.0039024823,0.0014870011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007058212,0.00024974943,0.0003241709,0.0021643352,0.017909307,0.010103569,0.002738038,0.0066554,0.008710405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021928005,0.0003682832,0.00062693015,0.0014830868,0.015010165,0.0024882888,0.005472671,0.007014844,0.00047759886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006860688,0.00018342023,0.024888882,0.00011128872,0.000050610462,0.003422807,0.021388678,0.001748734,0.001417966,0.8947378,0.012267677,0.039713457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018010678,0.0004905068,0.137585,0.0020699052,0.0007498752,0.0068262136,0.07864653,0.012656865,0.013462641,0.23309831,0.5137033,0.00053074304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38988927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48226333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61011076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024695357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028611716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7752397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244052","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v14i2.279","title":"Assessing Fees when Class Actions Follow Government Action","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Plaintiff; Government (linguistics); Enforcement; Supreme court; Class (philosophy); Economic Justice; Action (physics); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.10780324859313761,"score_gpt":0.27811053435354,"score_spread":0.17030728576040238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69905245,0.0071669295,0.011021525,0.010222614,0.00042934925,0.0004937575,0.0020918278,0.000102733946,0.26941875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99122167,0.0007863336,0.001076438,0.00037812823,0.000045453977,0.000018015333,0.00026745885,0.000008996948,0.006197534],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798181,0.002594534,0.0011289907,0.0011079427,0.012845473,0.002504926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95506597,0.011019217,0.011387478,0.0011322942,0.019154025,0.0022410403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008537002,0.00028239327,0.00044813976,0.0053286077,0.0031641677,0.0051060445,0.0017159897,0.0019087137,0.004892467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05680276,0.00022666615,0.00060199574,0.0032704493,0.0030475655,0.002424613,0.001774013,0.002338718,0.00059489824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037301012,0.00031742148,0.60022736,0.00041108707,0.0003452393,0.00079100183,0.0040982994,0.014416229,0.0008681451,0.18597455,0.031856794,0.16032083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059580198,0.00021993091,0.8630989,0.00077808043,0.0004763033,0.00038179595,0.004255318,0.015306074,0.0024645794,0.043954883,0.06883703,0.00016749837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6789091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80077374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32109088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025801541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029489007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64596367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244055","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i1.127","title":"A Call for Clarity: Ontario’s Disjointed Privacy Class Actions and the Need for Privacy Law Reform","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Seclusion; Tort; Punitive damages; Law; Waiver; Political science; Internet privacy; Computer security; State (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.08655324007435142,"score_gpt":0.287557646966937,"score_spread":0.20100440689258556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244055","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013111235,0.07864412,0.001424914,0.8190023,0.0029003907,0.000089697685,0.00041499682,0.00005394957,0.08435837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5680032,0.09740063,0.007174082,0.26491427,0.0025129523,0.00015652706,0.00043856245,0.000115195326,0.05928459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9778024,0.003234166,0.0009157202,0.0016089185,0.011462064,0.004976631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9270193,0.02398852,0.0039003307,0.0026582717,0.034521077,0.007912408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021450605,0.00036246373,0.00092081795,0.0029701993,0.016052682,0.014690515,0.0047267647,0.010466562,0.0064729555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043899212,0.0006509117,0.00094275066,0.004448984,0.021577269,0.007301475,0.0040265513,0.010547792,0.0005107328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055773067,0.00003308469,0.0033482024,0.001421656,0.00004137448,0.00057030254,0.0119827865,0.00062747824,0.0005073963,0.6127409,0.3009409,0.06773016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035443183,0.000022469922,0.01095654,0.002788047,0.000067513385,0.00013665718,0.007592805,0.00035539275,0.00030515832,0.026730685,0.95090824,0.00010118522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.986938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99396294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19762248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19762248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.45436773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9306442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244056","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i1.005","title":"L’accès À la Justice Pour les Personnes Vulnérables par la Voie de L’action Collective en Droit Québécois","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Economic Justice; Action (physics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Damages; Collateral; Settlement (finance); Compensation (psychology); Vulnerability (computing); Criminology; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Geography; Computer security; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.11050649169997039,"score_gpt":0.3520173006824248,"score_spread":0.24151080898245442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16847931,0.19541046,0.0022742462,0.23423329,0.004690078,0.0003711543,0.0020340506,0.00009776146,0.39240968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81423056,0.06799138,0.0022373365,0.024263285,0.0008603355,0.00021659886,0.00064261677,0.000037458005,0.08952033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548054,0.001236488,0.00016921808,0.0002784204,0.0016699762,0.0011654021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904857,0.0033709605,0.00063886755,0.00023216254,0.0038853968,0.0013868699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008185459,0.00038568157,0.00045857704,0.0032780143,0.00823141,0.0058175297,0.0014263775,0.003520818,0.014062663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014029011,0.0002990496,0.00045257463,0.0019933546,0.0034371205,0.0015517,0.0018645579,0.0036338142,0.00053336256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025454402,0.0002413398,0.039834972,0.0029315348,0.00020850911,0.0030173778,0.030478392,0.0011596264,0.0013182387,0.2359802,0.35259503,0.3319802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006301125,0.000116236566,0.057085022,0.0076723564,0.00017805568,0.000577041,0.017523607,0.0005469688,0.0006711602,0.005290224,0.91018146,0.00009489079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9693905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9841361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045703553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045703553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.116800405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33160406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244059","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i2.187","title":"Determining a Fair Price for Carriage?: Applying a “Fee-Driven” Factor and Reverse Auctions to Adjudicating Carriage Motions in Ontario","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Adjudication; Discretion; Common value auction; Commission; Test (biology); Law and economics; Class (philosophy); Carriage; Reverse auction; Consistency (knowledge bases); Law; Business; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Microeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.10897969187089407,"score_gpt":0.3628210406555465,"score_spread":0.2538413487846524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70559156,0.0010211287,0.019866688,0.015964225,0.00017822534,0.00095535145,0.0004144731,0.000072640876,0.25593567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787603,0.00037921307,0.004247546,0.0005965996,0.00004049189,0.000057030713,0.00006402694,0.000011790679,0.01584303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98804605,0.0022367253,0.00075059576,0.0011931362,0.004532523,0.003240866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825943,0.008837572,0.0016031738,0.0009416316,0.004990156,0.0010331587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010096037,0.0003386514,0.0004899685,0.0014637009,0.010797088,0.008818579,0.0026069493,0.0036096897,0.0052160886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0319066,0.00079602795,0.000627907,0.002194641,0.0068405117,0.0028643326,0.003243553,0.0028598881,0.0003133702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008246933,0.00034696338,0.1353264,0.0005563575,0.000231629,0.006195918,0.033059128,0.020064957,0.0048908666,0.6842542,0.02900724,0.08524157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008217856,0.0008198279,0.27386785,0.00091222173,0.0009650513,0.0018730108,0.07357082,0.10018216,0.012400347,0.16756754,0.3658916,0.0011278397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9542634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9855533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0936597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0936597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10403329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67955184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244066","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i1.139","title":"Consumer Class Arbitration in Canada: It’s about Time","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Class action; Plaintiff; Compulsory arbitration; Damages; Political science; Res judicata; Enforcement; Law; Law and economics; Class (philosophy); Civil procedure; Business; Economic Justice; Economics; State (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.02158914075490649,"score_gpt":0.2348257044186489,"score_spread":0.21323656366374238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059058916,0.2596727,0.0056727924,0.21029161,0.0032136673,0.00018384159,0.0009822082,0.000100038764,0.46082422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81343657,0.08966148,0.0040731193,0.02531247,0.0007990954,0.000066213695,0.00041421366,0.000079934805,0.06615681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99006397,0.001157531,0.00027212853,0.000706152,0.006125558,0.0016746281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98183,0.0034411608,0.0010485183,0.00043438617,0.011922489,0.0013235731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070780474,0.00020943732,0.0004424972,0.0026694133,0.0075913463,0.009358294,0.0018548277,0.002309871,0.00754946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016503802,0.00021027931,0.00043736672,0.005282797,0.0058700754,0.0018445249,0.0016118108,0.0029706485,0.00035194537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011027465,0.00004767132,0.01087199,0.0010788807,0.00006412456,0.0005169176,0.007852136,0.0011418064,0.00051755295,0.6068761,0.14626507,0.22465749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022229955,0.000025180665,0.016955044,0.0011645586,0.00007278314,0.00014127545,0.0036684922,0.0006649598,0.00057793537,0.012025604,0.96462125,0.000060708757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98604184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.989917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11364369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11364369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2123313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8245466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244070","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v14i2.421","title":"A Statutory Solution to Ontario’s Environmental Class Action Problem: Section 99(2) of the <i>Environmental Protection Act</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Certification; Environmental law; Environmental justice; Appeal; Statutory law; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Section (typography); Law; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Advertising","score_opus":0.028197371177713947,"score_gpt":0.26100043478940693,"score_spread":0.23280306361169298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024306567,0.046922438,0.0048500677,0.43547007,0.004797196,0.00056891557,0.0017382437,0.00019301428,0.48115355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5164169,0.03863395,0.014226627,0.17146428,0.0024726596,0.0004469102,0.0013352432,0.00014016968,0.25486317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98757696,0.0012128719,0.0005905597,0.00083999196,0.007882454,0.0018971747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98167187,0.0047917035,0.0010971891,0.0008899068,0.0104209455,0.0011284268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010607682,0.00035164706,0.00038088483,0.0032323417,0.008378028,0.006415379,0.0038166165,0.008831054,0.0073691523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019898599,0.00062882353,0.00072176324,0.0033599283,0.006967464,0.0020875202,0.0019536233,0.005403947,0.00080712896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029525609,0.000036059115,0.0035011375,0.0007694533,0.000027654021,0.0005066388,0.0029201517,0.00046658018,0.0007628252,0.527009,0.40700144,0.056969523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000398391,0.00002517684,0.010900476,0.0010083985,0.0000592611,0.00014880447,0.0012663666,0.0003804478,0.00040322187,0.009660455,0.97605497,0.00005257382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9721886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081207916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.081207916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27368987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5892074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244074","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i1.169","title":"Do You have the Heart? A Cross-Border Comparative Case Study Analysis of Certification Legislation and Motions to Certify Vioxx Class Action Lawsuits in Ontario and the United States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Certification; Plaintiff; Legislation; Civil procedure; Law; Political science; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.22643871207874378,"score_gpt":0.5321856805516759,"score_spread":0.30574696847293215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9340264,0.0019458565,0.00045195105,0.0040301555,0.00004990184,0.0002669735,0.00024310022,0.0000044801586,0.05898124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99341244,0.0011210025,0.00030229322,0.00062327285,0.000012168424,0.00007826482,0.0000945171,0.0000050518092,0.0043508434],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917435,0.0029429356,0.0003425798,0.0006198756,0.0020268052,0.002324147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819489,0.009648862,0.0031869407,0.00064636406,0.0033427894,0.0012261414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006904476,0.000275128,0.0005637358,0.0031990588,0.023752972,0.0066836677,0.0019713335,0.0028260224,0.004444521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017111812,0.00044062326,0.00049897755,0.0076306136,0.009443035,0.0028354942,0.0040772725,0.0027734162,0.00020849728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028767492,0.0003786876,0.12954935,0.00042604652,0.000091448055,0.010985589,0.7438321,0.00039571658,0.00096161704,0.08753545,0.007966085,0.01759027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026222617,0.000068013695,0.09438593,0.00050342386,0.00007047576,0.0005780839,0.8604088,0.00036784168,0.0002766167,0.0012413793,0.042027995,0.00004516905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9452345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98563147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11390809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11390809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059239622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8264649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244078","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v14i2.363","title":"The Role of Certification in <i>Charter</i> Class Actions to Assert the Rights of Persons in Prison","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Charter; Certification; Class action; Government (linguistics); Class (philosophy); Political science; Assertion; Action (physics); Human rights; Law; Public administration; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.08421078624157659,"score_gpt":0.4260828660672454,"score_spread":0.3418720798256688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244078","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04692315,0.14571674,0.0028697343,0.17601979,0.0032886607,0.00031763245,0.00047188348,0.00012010277,0.6242723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86245054,0.05721092,0.0024805784,0.037432168,0.000816679,0.00008004328,0.00022759364,0.00005807971,0.03924337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98021734,0.003405563,0.0005856349,0.00088298536,0.010118681,0.0047897696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95861745,0.0121517405,0.002930753,0.0009452744,0.021254655,0.0041001975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016409688,0.0002683559,0.00035089508,0.004060905,0.008394465,0.010845399,0.0030561031,0.0041079666,0.004176828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030222774,0.00026343917,0.00048982096,0.0028731152,0.01138061,0.0020724828,0.0022279646,0.00456759,0.0003937619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005936733,0.00011494222,0.011787471,0.0017033934,0.000052524454,0.0005284383,0.014991061,0.0009037764,0.0007746216,0.53442097,0.20649704,0.22816636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002263461,0.00007138123,0.030376684,0.0043192175,0.00008890249,0.0002081692,0.008908318,0.00035995521,0.0007434598,0.0054808734,0.9493363,0.00008416766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96469873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9796944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078174636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.078174636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23583305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56719935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244084","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i2.005","title":"Linking Societal Injustice and Legalization: Potential of Canadian Class Actions in Addressing International Human Rights Violations Committed by Canadian Corporations Abroad","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; Injustice; Law; Economic Justice; Class action; International law; Harm; Legalization; Law and economics; Sociology; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.07262581761669876,"score_gpt":0.3025497972885105,"score_spread":0.22992397967181175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12586457,0.14029405,0.0035333722,0.13055103,0.001834931,0.00029639938,0.0009952618,0.000076452474,0.59655386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8819945,0.06381593,0.0019547204,0.01737203,0.00033558477,0.000084754094,0.00039599588,0.00003543317,0.034011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98818386,0.0017103528,0.00044310134,0.0007948791,0.005963848,0.002903903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682708,0.009078931,0.0022940985,0.0007457215,0.017778758,0.0018316987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010859788,0.00034304336,0.00032393794,0.0061340528,0.009571439,0.0103180045,0.0024126766,0.002809369,0.0042789113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02416023,0.0002516348,0.0005182415,0.006409634,0.010466498,0.0022391928,0.0028596392,0.0037054464,0.00018669745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006238891,0.000072010334,0.03624879,0.0018542173,0.00011052652,0.00079978065,0.0200273,0.0014833809,0.0005092401,0.6345129,0.11072909,0.19359043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031791114,0.00007041386,0.08818176,0.004683769,0.0004683045,0.0002551794,0.0240687,0.0013040805,0.0016250544,0.018067082,0.8610816,0.00016220236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98560876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99166626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082710065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.082710065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21893865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60010636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244086","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i2.037","title":"Class Actions, Climate Change, and the <i>Charter</i>: Is Success Possible in Common Law Canada?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Class action; Political science; Class (philosophy); Common law; Law; Climate change; Law and economics; Environmental law; Authorization; Certification; Economics; Computer security; State (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.08040109994875663,"score_gpt":0.32658003662515467,"score_spread":0.24617893667639804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021172049,0.31248355,0.0014725474,0.27645692,0.0032713385,0.000112253765,0.0008803692,0.000056630815,0.38409433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67392194,0.20754635,0.00220655,0.05479017,0.0014430963,0.00008238515,0.00057531666,0.00007839116,0.059355818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872749,0.0016310655,0.0002999006,0.00069923856,0.007306938,0.0027879807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797142,0.004639612,0.0011165804,0.00046833284,0.011868285,0.0021930484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011251078,0.0003744358,0.00057991064,0.0040810965,0.011688139,0.013528311,0.0026346683,0.0043219887,0.00577648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016200364,0.0002722592,0.00050814584,0.006825458,0.016910497,0.0029954966,0.0019142493,0.006017923,0.00035021416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022883252,0.000038460046,0.0024752526,0.0006813514,0.000037461465,0.00013064193,0.004364783,0.0006613584,0.000129057,0.7637616,0.1695178,0.05817939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012780837,0.000021447786,0.013150385,0.0031633484,0.00008274021,0.000045365705,0.0063343183,0.00045762368,0.00021483355,0.026015397,0.9504189,0.000082949104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99054575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14464246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14464246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31619212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244088","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i1.005","title":"The Collective Class Action: An Expansion of the Class Action Framework","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Collective action; Class (philosophy); Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Indigenous; Political science; Corporate governance; Constructive; Discretion; Diversity (politics); Action (physics); Public relations; Sociology; Law; Economics; Computer science; Geography; Management","score_opus":0.07336874934503602,"score_gpt":0.37243002289313965,"score_spread":0.29906127354810363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006599933,0.035085417,0.094726555,0.10157931,0.0019457014,0.00047818164,0.0001669982,0.00010450649,0.75931346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81373733,0.018021932,0.07861007,0.016541805,0.0021094119,0.00089424103,0.00011981519,0.000109896064,0.06985556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9702248,0.014437801,0.00089162524,0.0021750352,0.009101626,0.0031691105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788054,0.011647991,0.0010121624,0.0013716687,0.0059315423,0.001231276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037995238,0.0007437018,0.0009961098,0.0073109893,0.009712145,0.012000485,0.004152318,0.0071026636,0.0062094554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01744135,0.0005819072,0.0010693326,0.0034641002,0.05190829,0.005918157,0.0050076703,0.007829642,0.00060408405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017199336,0.0000037349466,0.00007312947,0.00004282389,0.0000019418328,0.000025012183,0.0006491919,0.00023424739,0.00001692751,0.9921934,0.0023233695,0.0044345492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025215651,0.000024568799,0.0012327835,0.0010021083,0.000023629162,0.00006732991,0.0011910191,0.0019557176,0.00012488577,0.621165,0.3731442,0.000043552707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4377464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45774534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4377464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052935846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07734485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87039685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244104","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i1.051","title":"Shared Goals, Divided Jurisdiction: The Uneasy Relationship Between Class Actions and Administrative Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Plaintiff; Class action; Law; Political science; Legislature; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Civil procedure; Dispute resolution; Administrative law; Arbitration; State (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.21093960834006106,"score_gpt":0.3321303451885609,"score_spread":0.12119073684849982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10183067,0.021818487,0.023608223,0.1787668,0.00067375303,0.00016528547,0.00019038125,0.000056614863,0.6728898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756516,0.0028385941,0.0027016916,0.005525869,0.00016520906,0.000037134214,0.000025337853,0.000020824904,0.013033659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9745175,0.008436862,0.00059857924,0.0017286371,0.010467745,0.0042505683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726064,0.015066434,0.002046135,0.0012774924,0.007083227,0.0019201863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019130398,0.0002868817,0.0004987852,0.003293058,0.012470112,0.016448893,0.0022449733,0.0034055728,0.006756301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033879083,0.0003419368,0.00038002958,0.0034983417,0.048938014,0.0067536333,0.0064993384,0.006114873,0.00024918737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008888675,0.0000078688045,0.0011813624,0.00003978753,0.000005607199,0.000071677,0.004563682,0.00017726191,0.00004796144,0.97837627,0.00402149,0.011498124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041962012,0.000044161276,0.021784155,0.00085362996,0.00006661747,0.00025343985,0.02843486,0.0016413329,0.00044724022,0.64434457,0.3020092,0.0000788305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76934016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86030626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76934016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061855227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07900889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46403646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244112","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i2.093","title":"The Unworkability of the Workable Methodology Standard","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Jurisprudence; Harm; Class (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Standard of review; Management science; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Law; Political science; Business; Epistemology; Economics; Judicial review; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.24558615611904988,"score_gpt":0.4420005306699135,"score_spread":0.19641437455086364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023846518,0.0054194513,0.26010197,0.33479768,0.0044074454,0.0009173779,0.00082778774,0.000578913,0.3691029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7520853,0.0020743292,0.12650208,0.0869838,0.0015462679,0.00087543076,0.0003063754,0.00023328784,0.029393008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88163155,0.029242372,0.008283993,0.01310795,0.061714247,0.0060198577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8259412,0.08491315,0.0063441107,0.02165216,0.057245772,0.003903747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09864448,0.0008737835,0.001253821,0.004275863,0.010052179,0.013857646,0.008425756,0.018105429,0.0051141926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1625721,0.001391372,0.0022372333,0.0022013665,0.064945474,0.010996377,0.008898493,0.026644425,0.0018238557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000973063,0.000008591314,0.0002464187,0.000050458093,0.00000949828,0.000045798344,0.0008145159,0.00013198347,0.00013162199,0.9897531,0.004573373,0.004224853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007434776,0.00006156332,0.0015429922,0.0006643752,0.0000649953,0.00022457074,0.0008691868,0.0017546524,0.0012402621,0.9059145,0.08745539,0.00013320002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24704602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1883545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24704602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029993525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07840907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5216881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244119","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i2.051","title":"An Overview of Class Actions and Covid-19 in Ontario’s Long-Term Care Facilities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Long-term care; Government (linguistics); Plaintiff; Legislature; Pandemic; Political science; Duty of care; Causation; Public administration; Business; Public relations; Economic growth; Medicine; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Law; Nursing; Economics","score_opus":0.2214919206352509,"score_gpt":0.42846463517584543,"score_spread":0.20697271454059454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20036753,0.24472018,0.002820886,0.105744645,0.0021861957,0.00050403195,0.0040213973,0.0001229962,0.43951204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69698626,0.21265565,0.0022234968,0.010993915,0.0011755177,0.0002407949,0.0015391962,0.0000885113,0.07409669],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752957,0.0002823336,0.000110658264,0.00011179558,0.0009260003,0.0010396675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99631846,0.0008176937,0.0007019885,0.00010405093,0.0010829263,0.00097495446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001558907,0.00037268974,0.00027183045,0.0035082744,0.009829275,0.005223735,0.0015868971,0.0020806678,0.007249718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00264821,0.00045371457,0.0005514816,0.0068865945,0.005834947,0.0022724723,0.0030146025,0.0018353008,0.0003163024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001538014,0.00014661437,0.08442352,0.0058548404,0.000105233856,0.0042983326,0.18526524,0.0017282522,0.0021315701,0.2110932,0.21578725,0.28901216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057581783,0.000031777898,0.08093849,0.0015996359,0.000019154411,0.00026332986,0.02637809,0.00013565455,0.0001192695,0.0015212119,0.8889347,0.000052918556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98131853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99262637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14911674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14911674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14068162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98690397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244123","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i1.077","title":"The Death of Champerty: Is Third Party Litigation Funding the New Normal in Class Actions?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Lawsuit; Statute; Political science; Supreme court; Legislature; Law; Res judicata; Legislation; Commission; Class (philosophy); Business; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.10910878281448978,"score_gpt":0.2748520729138414,"score_spread":0.16574329009935163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15132086,0.0065301154,0.0020703394,0.2940265,0.0014045162,0.00007191228,0.0003151393,0.00005831482,0.5442023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8486292,0.0027340536,0.0004511266,0.019369142,0.0005460275,0.0000322303,0.000086018306,0.000039419476,0.12811278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991322,0.0010599147,0.00018145874,0.0008957473,0.0036299084,0.0029110708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864581,0.0038200861,0.001437091,0.00064280856,0.0042436807,0.0033982107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062825955,0.00016503443,0.00031770318,0.0010739225,0.019116132,0.013423728,0.0018353645,0.0061186273,0.014030106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019919463,0.00037699495,0.00025057778,0.0012598993,0.015676329,0.005873758,0.0035428856,0.0073649576,0.00083079044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008483756,0.000033446668,0.014361095,0.00009446422,0.000014580767,0.0013471375,0.034494776,0.00016024832,0.00034378582,0.7762714,0.13319863,0.039595496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028801822,0.00004631663,0.02590968,0.0006029325,0.00003948767,0.00062572374,0.031598285,0.0005282027,0.0007723901,0.031595375,0.9081452,0.0001076399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8628725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.932126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8628725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08432551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.092884235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61182725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244126","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i2.115","title":"If It Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix It; If You’re not Sure, Measure Again: Strengthening the Imperfect Mechanics of Class Authorization","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Authorization; Intuition; Legislature; Incentive; Law and economics; Class (philosophy); Imperfect; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Law; Business; Computer security; Psychology; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07128160262642219,"score_gpt":0.2463536472131486,"score_spread":0.1750720445867264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244126","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066630185,0.0091247205,0.027416598,0.29169145,0.0019843758,0.00026526078,0.00082272093,0.00031991553,0.60174483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9086733,0.0031777134,0.004383789,0.020942878,0.0005932621,0.00007021735,0.00010414383,0.00007709941,0.06197764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903998,0.0030207413,0.0002559447,0.0010002119,0.003264646,0.0020587125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700844,0.01232653,0.0021051,0.0024155932,0.011435991,0.001632426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0122616505,0.00036026412,0.0006394376,0.0014451604,0.008853265,0.011368117,0.0022032545,0.0046643303,0.019621642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038098004,0.00040696163,0.0005538316,0.0011700746,0.013833179,0.0053010876,0.0021415786,0.0055622156,0.001569023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049380687,0.000031982214,0.0041409913,0.000103915896,0.00003302429,0.00012216013,0.00094674225,0.0020306625,0.00028176457,0.88982886,0.0803299,0.02210054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015057462,0.0001340552,0.03450374,0.0011115776,0.00022240056,0.00018581269,0.0036032912,0.016680153,0.0025155481,0.43902117,0.5015291,0.00034251623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8244542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8742162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8244542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051291883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05237558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37215042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244135","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i2.143","title":"The Limits of Case Management: A Review and Principled Approach to the Court’s General Management Powers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Normative; Variety (cybernetics); Divergence (linguistics); Class (philosophy); Power (physics); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Legislation; Test (biology); Sociology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.043999075383298086,"score_gpt":0.2787616463311528,"score_spread":0.23476257094785472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018832728,0.2844219,0.111467645,0.20889753,0.0022228565,0.0012687766,0.0004710843,0.00034740282,0.3720702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7542153,0.10347999,0.0810003,0.032906733,0.002812411,0.0011209606,0.0002676027,0.00010529803,0.024091445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9418259,0.019614028,0.003975392,0.003201598,0.028452449,0.002930525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9042075,0.061450485,0.004451596,0.0034163063,0.025365448,0.0011086322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07098243,0.0007592034,0.0014776706,0.016034052,0.008950361,0.023816807,0.006129023,0.008960475,0.001638215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065382086,0.0012366887,0.0010543274,0.009521689,0.034588534,0.0060815043,0.0035995322,0.0094398465,0.00033349014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009622985,0.00001299763,0.0005162399,0.00048606363,0.00001555813,0.00013138526,0.0017631663,0.0013074916,0.00017306638,0.95040447,0.011412604,0.033767324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040066046,0.0000483582,0.0037645714,0.007190994,0.00015824682,0.00030833925,0.0020364032,0.004898195,0.0010681616,0.5382199,0.44209483,0.0001717812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44520822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57689416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44520822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07331836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13664816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88523364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244142","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i2.005","title":"Book Review: <i>Defending Class Actions in Canada: A Guide for Defendants</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Class (philosophy); Class action; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Programming language; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.04436887130234667,"score_gpt":0.28444372100498244,"score_spread":0.24007484970263576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006561435,0.23234975,0.0014988167,0.19424257,0.055628344,0.0011637966,0.010868756,0.0012470911,0.50234467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003338841,0.10547742,0.0013251286,0.039158728,0.005317879,0.00037197888,0.0031332292,0.00031199976,0.84156483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942462,0.00023609951,0.0002104887,0.00024244991,0.004512575,0.0005522156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777169,0.001862245,0.0006488172,0.0002622606,0.018235883,0.0012738369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027059244,0.0015409434,0.0018181483,0.009996237,0.006517483,0.007862343,0.004155147,0.007338417,0.075140305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014185476,0.0011277222,0.001040479,0.0153528005,0.0025210644,0.0022125589,0.0011768754,0.0052053835,0.031726968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.679527e-7,0.0000019381635,0.000021572565,0.000050283343,7.5326597e-7,0.000004394652,0.000009308465,0.000015237514,0.000007072282,0.0003190863,0.994136,0.0054333443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026935656,0.000002685596,0.0005885244,0.00030731753,0.000005815489,0.000012718014,0.000050363604,0.00002751614,0.000019206083,0.00022334064,0.99874806,0.000011728603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93704945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9817616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075140305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051828057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15196937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244143","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i2.067","title":"Public Health Inquiries and the Class Action Fall-Out","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Commission; Certification; Action (physics); Liability; Public health; Public relations; Subject (documents); Political science; Law; Medicine; Nursing; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.4724636154499362,"score_gpt":0.49619956172963525,"score_spread":0.02373594627969905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244143","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005801927,0.16670804,0.0017095157,0.61503583,0.0068095396,0.000354307,0.0007411014,0.00008214044,0.20275761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32421964,0.113417685,0.004185062,0.47472495,0.0045048133,0.0003604059,0.00070187694,0.00017970911,0.0777058],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.891846,0.020610219,0.0057517355,0.0041928533,0.06532824,0.012271007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74437445,0.11565549,0.009253054,0.0054304157,0.11702996,0.008256679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08991019,0.0005798692,0.0008704603,0.009145968,0.017251296,0.019963771,0.0059058485,0.016868148,0.009315349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1588538,0.0009861891,0.001330182,0.007253034,0.022059025,0.00516275,0.004248198,0.017894704,0.001157278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046449364,0.0000535904,0.0021183717,0.0017674095,0.00007193772,0.00030884118,0.004547662,0.00036765626,0.00020894491,0.3576427,0.55512303,0.07774342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030635547,0.000025194324,0.0071775853,0.0050533162,0.00009659611,0.0000984121,0.0025779794,0.00018497408,0.00030331107,0.010080816,0.9742861,0.00008516857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93355304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.950105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93355304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12231424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3666949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88745606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244146","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i2.117","title":"United we Stand, Divided we Fall: Class Actions and Corporate Hegemony","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Hegemony; Neoliberalism (international relations); Redress; Plaintiff; Sociology; Law; Marxist philosophy; Political science; Law and economics; Collective action; Supreme court; Politics; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.13074796353159782,"score_gpt":0.2711531230292744,"score_spread":0.1404051594976766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090779744,0.014545377,0.0052242074,0.11632849,0.0011738543,0.000116260126,0.00011473199,0.00004598942,0.7716713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9420742,0.0019934617,0.0008686274,0.01037109,0.00025824684,0.00004549051,0.000036571902,0.000023422494,0.04432884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872328,0.0033340384,0.00020166085,0.0011047564,0.0048135105,0.0033132043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946226,0.002124563,0.0005310985,0.00041302788,0.0015055988,0.0008031705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008226487,0.00029881787,0.0003576606,0.0017486414,0.018034646,0.013163146,0.0015978166,0.0048122755,0.0071096416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009951629,0.00024274678,0.0003140491,0.0013162212,0.043023724,0.0044220085,0.004818365,0.004995243,0.00050909945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010759944,0.000012596049,0.0016037135,0.00003649922,0.000007395498,0.00007144762,0.017858405,0.00012916018,0.00010953917,0.95068246,0.013555998,0.015922103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028511899,0.00003645862,0.011307713,0.0006498627,0.00003512262,0.00008137854,0.036983367,0.00045598383,0.0005125332,0.21118897,0.7386425,0.00007768698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7335762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8149658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7335762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05509811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05794118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5359857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244147","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i1.105","title":"When Hackers Strike: The Liability of Reckless Record Holders for Intrusion Upon Seclusion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Tort; Class action; Seclusion; Business; Plaintiff; Appeal; Context (archaeology); Internet privacy; Intrusion; Hacker; Law; Cause of action; Liability; Political science; Computer security; State (computer science); History","score_opus":0.09831176609958896,"score_gpt":0.33841793429229716,"score_spread":0.2401061681927082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244147","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00821375,0.8562636,0.00042080172,0.050964806,0.0015122483,0.00013190875,0.00027051108,0.000015866312,0.082206585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15306748,0.80825275,0.00073717267,0.023192376,0.0013148625,0.000088374036,0.00029986812,0.000016963411,0.013030126],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874778,0.0031418744,0.0008066186,0.00065215555,0.006420895,0.0015007983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97601944,0.00899266,0.003641838,0.0007656236,0.009306272,0.0012740524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013201921,0.00044991827,0.0007988418,0.0052083205,0.003318833,0.0053598704,0.0026068923,0.004692275,0.0054607894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028645026,0.00034959655,0.0009560234,0.0043362407,0.0077487766,0.0017745525,0.0014352389,0.0044189384,0.0007473778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027918816,0.00014258176,0.00909091,0.0117532695,0.00022904803,0.00096315873,0.003834176,0.0004034709,0.0005282546,0.109235674,0.19534811,0.6681922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008206177,0.00020301224,0.031352412,0.029348366,0.00043145908,0.0011034539,0.0029876237,0.00017355106,0.0006823865,0.0066063395,0.9269503,0.00007902475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73272383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86028576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73272383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040275984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08642522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5377004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413722868","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v19i1.39","title":"The Commonality Test in Class Action Certification: The Battleground of Screening Merits and Fair Process","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Class action; Test (biology); Class (philosophy); Process (computing); Action (physics); Computer science; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Programming language; Physics; Biology","score_opus":0.10289825405088047,"score_gpt":0.3236083298095724,"score_spread":0.2207100757586919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413722868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054981794,0.005054801,0.3185331,0.13764288,0.0022627993,0.00087538373,0.000118448166,0.0002065038,0.48032427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88761705,0.0015232445,0.066791296,0.017996892,0.001800042,0.00083691045,0.0000727023,0.00013234904,0.023229502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9358134,0.032031994,0.001977188,0.0059673632,0.02039281,0.0038172114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89494544,0.0878758,0.003613207,0.005398856,0.0059245904,0.0022421565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07276399,0.00078820094,0.001913877,0.00439553,0.010489527,0.018153926,0.0049115545,0.022730602,0.008761648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1841648,0.0008879314,0.0019173777,0.0023432316,0.06898667,0.034344297,0.011586927,0.022119116,0.0012558169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013088753,0.000012162687,0.00025403392,0.000013888926,0.000004004396,0.00009408044,0.00047047558,0.00016246745,0.00004766455,0.9947648,0.00085504184,0.0033083125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032108575,0.000048393627,0.00042559233,0.00013864948,0.000022007856,0.00012526233,0.00055930496,0.0018811479,0.00038083782,0.9853349,0.011011656,0.000040268496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008047274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007048047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9919527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009130326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018229222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38481736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413722882","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v19i1.5","title":"The (Un)Enforceability of Class Action Waivers in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Political science; Computer science; Physics; Artificial intelligence; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.043397756107215815,"score_gpt":0.26007170663569673,"score_spread":0.21667395052848093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413722882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1290194,0.18037635,0.003809244,0.14843011,0.0023944394,0.00033508288,0.0018551507,0.00016539973,0.5336149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87725675,0.05715593,0.002279715,0.014363489,0.00047683404,0.00006799373,0.000420208,0.00007400314,0.047905035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97540504,0.0017744319,0.000992353,0.0012607283,0.016367136,0.0042004543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9465772,0.011901031,0.0026716841,0.0012365859,0.034817785,0.0027955838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014157777,0.00028402577,0.00063922553,0.0046252464,0.013118974,0.012078419,0.0028854788,0.003051671,0.0025263808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046179958,0.00050446094,0.00045997082,0.007245841,0.0073373155,0.0018478814,0.0020515977,0.003735429,0.00017092036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118372154,0.00005574701,0.011880764,0.0013235344,0.00008917952,0.00051752705,0.01276032,0.0026224644,0.0010836573,0.6499908,0.1323887,0.18716899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003702783,0.00006196719,0.06346821,0.0018221069,0.0001920906,0.00013327113,0.0054652602,0.001500635,0.001405962,0.01745573,0.9082585,0.00019930213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99586475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1753191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1753191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35607412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9565129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413733799","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v19i1.79","title":"Bridging Borders: Reforming Canada’s Approach to Resolving Carriage Challenges in Light of Global Practices","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carriage; Bridging (networking); Political science; Regional science; Economic geography; Geography; Computer science; Archaeology; Computer security","score_opus":0.12443820387318652,"score_gpt":0.38217999714216816,"score_spread":0.2577417932689816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413733799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07726757,0.008646376,0.024752658,0.23372027,0.0018632986,0.00039191797,0.00021050686,0.00024650324,0.65290093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8426432,0.0042179613,0.014255157,0.044166215,0.00036332206,0.00017260553,0.00013003837,0.00009823134,0.09395335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98733366,0.0016260525,0.0002899644,0.0014354846,0.003866302,0.0054485165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946656,0.0010064655,0.00024978403,0.0004930476,0.002331574,0.0012534636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054276795,0.00055941334,0.00053600455,0.0028203856,0.028280325,0.015421532,0.0039002856,0.009392847,0.0051793787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011703253,0.00048348948,0.00088289153,0.003562636,0.025212089,0.005279834,0.006973196,0.008962394,0.00038049233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000121614685,0.00002397492,0.0021944414,0.00007368889,0.000019341856,0.0005097205,0.012223374,0.0017935046,0.00026841613,0.9332855,0.02975808,0.01983794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063030464,0.00005495276,0.008135098,0.000555788,0.00013216131,0.00035695604,0.030403813,0.003819046,0.00077967625,0.15638164,0.799161,0.00015676413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98647183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99242836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15057385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15057385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36375514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98521394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413733821","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v19i1.99","title":"Class Action Notice and Access to Justice: An accessibility and Design Analysis of Class Action Notice Campaigns","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Class action; Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Economic Justice; Political science; Business; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; State (computer science); Programming language; Physics","score_opus":0.17736318967667777,"score_gpt":0.3858146311411724,"score_spread":0.20845144146449465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413733821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93039274,0.0006763172,0.011456249,0.0012389739,0.000027846292,0.0035841893,0.0015539468,0.00012774514,0.05094197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98124146,0.0003022087,0.010192427,0.00027162326,0.000012306378,0.001902615,0.0005214781,0.00005988559,0.005495943],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728874,0.011521638,0.0012885288,0.0016460075,0.009721309,0.002935073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8044941,0.13369416,0.015555958,0.0075331596,0.036276415,0.0024461432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023137134,0.00035811609,0.0005852624,0.006153887,0.006316154,0.0056193834,0.001260987,0.00070163695,0.0063111163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11257309,0.00041466302,0.00085401104,0.008077515,0.0058931718,0.0025343685,0.0028846257,0.0015288476,0.00032796428],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080062385,0.0012394037,0.26240554,0.0032169032,0.0002683309,0.00055067486,0.4047276,0.002383656,0.0035023945,0.04554298,0.007313219,0.2680487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020060332,0.0012800876,0.69466573,0.001264971,0.00049928256,0.00012881843,0.20143439,0.0038193986,0.0037894228,0.0066477684,0.086105555,0.00016397767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63938767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69120115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36061233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06328955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05208423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7254721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413733822","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v19i1.159","title":"To Certify or not to Certify: Third Parties, Necessary Parties, and the Certification of Class Actions in Common Law Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Law; Class (philosophy); Common law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2073191494114714,"score_gpt":0.393964020773789,"score_spread":0.1866448713623176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413733822","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005089121,0.94115543,0.00047833702,0.025672916,0.0008128573,0.00005094083,0.00014488335,0.000008169599,0.026587322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18057291,0.80043,0.0014743578,0.011502889,0.00041860147,0.000052997588,0.0002120573,0.000018610932,0.005317616],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.982545,0.0032563116,0.0011858927,0.0009082644,0.010457086,0.0016473144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94581133,0.022230899,0.004488641,0.0007106496,0.024635723,0.0021226825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019716537,0.00043291677,0.0009804934,0.012387237,0.005282479,0.008740747,0.0030915237,0.0033289446,0.00267846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048482943,0.00048040895,0.00075440673,0.014120901,0.00971403,0.0025421893,0.0016861863,0.0038447657,0.00022019658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010303851,0.00009051647,0.010682497,0.017235383,0.00036506014,0.0005496003,0.00848327,0.0012608835,0.0003273784,0.30357352,0.15811542,0.49921352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006098649,0.000080439866,0.05116425,0.053868335,0.0010074627,0.0004156941,0.007043087,0.0005641432,0.0005675209,0.025104985,0.85993445,0.00018862716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9677193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98814523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09909667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09909667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27196676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71900004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128177316","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i2.265","title":"The Doctrine of Cy Près in Ontario Class Actions: Toward a Consistent, Principled, and Transparent Approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Doctrine; Class (philosophy); Nexus (standard); Class action; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.231953379596366,"score_gpt":0.2827192996514638,"score_spread":0.05076592005509781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128177316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0296955,0.048944887,0.04732561,0.14549053,0.0015004562,0.0004834706,0.00041276874,0.00012932291,0.72601736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85277873,0.023886759,0.023904812,0.017684035,0.0008808956,0.00032672405,0.00010066314,0.00004777171,0.08038956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806191,0.0045073144,0.00086573034,0.0013137257,0.010665262,0.0020288562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992423,0.0030426274,0.0006880258,0.00042548013,0.0031170084,0.00030379868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013217802,0.00037206334,0.00046884283,0.0023417773,0.009790267,0.01007256,0.0027042185,0.00476663,0.0013700168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017007593,0.00070372864,0.00043580064,0.002457106,0.021389253,0.0033201121,0.0025778802,0.005715766,0.00023330553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004024148,0.0000025811592,0.00026202167,0.00007832058,0.0000033563424,0.000046226818,0.0022536546,0.0003125169,0.00009804275,0.98226017,0.0070159733,0.0076630027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003855839,0.00002967286,0.0045025344,0.00067747827,0.000049834827,0.00007839012,0.0034816554,0.0014026188,0.0005929345,0.27618763,0.71287006,0.00008864392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89233106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93542665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107668936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.090599775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16924909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6573504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128178239","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v9i1_133","title":"Le Traitement du Lien de Causalité Dans le Cadre du Recours Collectif","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Opposition (politics); Liability; Substantive law; Collective action; Context (archaeology); Civil procedure","score_opus":0.020613348846831157,"score_gpt":0.22907877997759923,"score_spread":0.20846543113076807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128178239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0628061,0.110638246,0.06012803,0.09928229,0.0027216868,0.00031419142,0.0013601298,0.0003883655,0.66236097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8688764,0.028475149,0.012774151,0.006153413,0.001256812,0.00010734481,0.00034356036,0.00008727071,0.08192588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843465,0.0040844968,0.00054642506,0.001463013,0.008162959,0.0013964622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682515,0.015431454,0.0021906001,0.0023367014,0.011348542,0.00044112146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015270856,0.00046693286,0.00065797335,0.0053815986,0.0059973756,0.010095436,0.0022098792,0.0028264232,0.006194739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031914335,0.0005546509,0.0007946797,0.003782842,0.012256026,0.0035742891,0.0015625538,0.0051201405,0.000531648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018619901,0.000008899436,0.0028106624,0.00031919184,0.00005569367,0.00022898514,0.002106398,0.0011903448,0.00033779224,0.93829185,0.01614695,0.038484592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049081395,0.00005329427,0.03095138,0.0016553419,0.0002210887,0.00043624328,0.003024244,0.0029986892,0.002070509,0.16091478,0.79742765,0.00019765414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8593547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90090585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14064533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040847257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062072787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29636896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128179474","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v6i1.185","title":"Directors and Officers Beyond Canadian Borders: Searching for the Right Venue for the Claim or the Defence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics); Confidentiality","score_opus":0.03585556146842323,"score_gpt":0.3295352352128438,"score_spread":0.29367967374442056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128179474","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004904897,0.58659285,0.00045015858,0.27447283,0.007929042,0.000098315366,0.0006287526,0.00004274832,0.12488038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20761709,0.61616176,0.0023430258,0.106092334,0.003115216,0.0001634862,0.0009031106,0.00011772426,0.063486226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97132707,0.0038586783,0.0013410512,0.001154195,0.01595493,0.0063639665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93506455,0.010925137,0.0029533054,0.0010798278,0.044643324,0.0053337794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023058556,0.0009781288,0.0015242782,0.0142485285,0.015877502,0.017842393,0.005100387,0.008911522,0.011073173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052195393,0.00080360146,0.0009821487,0.017569218,0.0103996,0.0063002226,0.0031856648,0.008964579,0.0011593373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008101199,0.000033076507,0.002087326,0.0039038972,0.000096813776,0.00017558101,0.0056276466,0.00020795316,0.00021097207,0.118199944,0.7109584,0.15841737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022661707,0.000011316421,0.0055400864,0.006755346,0.0001434718,0.00004701507,0.007424644,0.000057543013,0.00017764923,0.003587965,0.9761681,0.00006424145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9825205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14848556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14848556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5372661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.987636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128179810","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v9i2.385","title":"“Paradise Lost”?: Rethinking Quebec’s Reputation as a Haven for Class Actions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Authorization; Reputation; Pessimism; Deterrence theory; New class","score_opus":0.06191352893827361,"score_gpt":0.30511492935750684,"score_spread":0.24320140041923322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128179810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06643795,0.20295818,0.0015948113,0.36056468,0.0057803695,0.00022329109,0.0015130442,0.00013083807,0.36079678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7958351,0.044103343,0.0015931292,0.06872292,0.0011470153,0.00008860544,0.0004190647,0.00008742037,0.08800343],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99139786,0.002031159,0.00031274965,0.0006521104,0.0037864696,0.0018196238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96931654,0.008453145,0.0013088124,0.0010364875,0.017650645,0.0022343763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0131558385,0.00027080454,0.000502324,0.0030468686,0.011214668,0.0121052945,0.0030169694,0.004724538,0.006044774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022396106,0.00034606928,0.00046349916,0.0030365416,0.005639876,0.0028035494,0.0013270804,0.005103836,0.0004395996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015118925,0.00006832523,0.008216303,0.000917098,0.000093609575,0.0008013899,0.0061889035,0.0008187662,0.0008590909,0.33413315,0.5280324,0.11971983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068176814,0.0000427142,0.021740392,0.0017178517,0.00010859646,0.00013759492,0.003031383,0.00054067024,0.000516123,0.004279847,0.9677119,0.00010466832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13869953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13869953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17770201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128181469","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i2.467","title":"Some Comparisons Between Class Actions in Canada and The U.S.: Securities Class Actions, Certification, and Costs","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Control (management); New class","score_opus":0.04779290514284004,"score_gpt":0.26040220958000737,"score_spread":0.21260930443716733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128181469","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08416769,0.47099873,0.0017542138,0.05765003,0.0026645248,0.00038918306,0.01772921,0.00012684116,0.36451963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71177685,0.2269254,0.0026711973,0.014231557,0.0009875998,0.00020600262,0.008974533,0.00012186421,0.034104988],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98400015,0.0011792268,0.0007395782,0.0005015464,0.01151434,0.0020651347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92184967,0.014643759,0.003415218,0.0007138643,0.057697963,0.0016795589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011503387,0.0005009314,0.00066175166,0.029777972,0.005967396,0.00824098,0.0027454786,0.0016744831,0.00391132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040539276,0.0004058888,0.0010133991,0.04150721,0.0025816814,0.0018777237,0.0009898334,0.002561709,0.00022540688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028930957,0.000090448266,0.050977767,0.004001401,0.00033829798,0.00031801817,0.0064411946,0.0031361163,0.00055429223,0.26105028,0.42794234,0.2448605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004833308,0.00008030817,0.31493706,0.003073171,0.0004967574,0.00010935804,0.0072630723,0.00096498977,0.00078014855,0.0063175736,0.6657567,0.00017247774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99105513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116511784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.116511784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16214922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8453561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128182976","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v10i1-2.81","title":"Ontario’s Class Proceedings Fund: Separating Fact from Fiction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Action (physics); Third party; Disbursement; Sustainability","score_opus":0.11657417075270887,"score_gpt":0.29319725561960963,"score_spread":0.17662308486690076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128182976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014229136,0.34302717,0.0034797394,0.2511541,0.008637852,0.0002126186,0.0006823523,0.00007914409,0.37849784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5100951,0.28319272,0.0066885315,0.047445737,0.0038951105,0.00018676,0.0007134229,0.00015304331,0.14762953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98754233,0.0018023447,0.0006252286,0.00060566794,0.0078065046,0.0016179234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731698,0.01072648,0.0020752014,0.0011052097,0.011186307,0.0017369078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011360268,0.00036479032,0.00042572364,0.005133339,0.011635861,0.009866524,0.002013197,0.0034978397,0.005358936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031657632,0.00033434326,0.0004243131,0.006321753,0.015329146,0.004658761,0.0021547864,0.0026104604,0.0005631775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036239464,0.000014035259,0.0024381105,0.0017270136,0.000025632497,0.00042608674,0.013802746,0.00027248164,0.00033499362,0.5056992,0.32803828,0.14718516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044095746,0.0000049943064,0.0036016684,0.0010615377,0.000015099157,0.000047426525,0.0023008035,0.000056847388,0.00011221774,0.005456902,0.98732144,0.000016644179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96148735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98302436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11950163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11950163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23788773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86704904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128184417","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i2.383","title":"Book Review: <i>Class Actions in Canada: The Promise and Reality of Access to Justice</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.07643526671799572,"score_gpt":0.3169601246635312,"score_spread":0.24052485794553546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128184417","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039026552,0.56373394,0.00029736676,0.21935235,0.06997287,0.00014506471,0.0037675342,0.00016353892,0.14217706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01079528,0.5849448,0.0007582655,0.10276055,0.02121515,0.0001767622,0.002801007,0.00021499845,0.2763332],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994352,0.00025176507,0.00019893229,0.00027565227,0.004324366,0.0005974184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733417,0.0030621272,0.0009706866,0.00032869284,0.02051828,0.0017784622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002858368,0.0011624824,0.0014801394,0.007303092,0.004699737,0.008822998,0.0034984297,0.0059689716,0.037074354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016922066,0.0006675069,0.0008438669,0.016143752,0.0035204613,0.0021225107,0.0012570914,0.0058235917,0.00760538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027443743,0.0000014545809,0.000032573455,0.00016451138,0.0000028468748,0.000006346142,0.000017494209,0.00001642608,0.0000071677596,0.0009475363,0.99193734,0.00686358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004488903,0.000002709359,0.0006498507,0.00075289776,0.0000142028375,0.000020599622,0.00007948935,0.000015287127,0.000014135558,0.00033846503,0.99809605,0.000011757622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9452562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98309267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05988662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05988662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19413081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43450987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128184842","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i1.219","title":"The Certification of Competition-Related Class Actions in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Certification; Control (management); World class; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.03175589741554505,"score_gpt":0.24031039925888725,"score_spread":0.2085545018433422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128184842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17378226,0.2588864,0.0044667013,0.18938503,0.008358898,0.0016826034,0.012053407,0.00048738075,0.3508973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.804007,0.078434,0.00450761,0.029530762,0.0008791639,0.00039652784,0.004715104,0.00015422914,0.077375524],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9658702,0.0026297558,0.0022516982,0.0014398417,0.023468338,0.0043401853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7942991,0.019210218,0.007552017,0.0022675914,0.16844863,0.008222426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030990098,0.0004055595,0.0008881527,0.013425628,0.009405163,0.009474179,0.0049582063,0.005260086,0.0030056087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07273269,0.00082092814,0.0007407961,0.013782131,0.0032422843,0.0017951066,0.0017202466,0.0039304346,0.00038848602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030702722,0.00020729381,0.03782158,0.0038377785,0.00016759706,0.0005379534,0.0061944956,0.0027511695,0.0015391983,0.10960596,0.53744245,0.29958746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008365478,0.00009304123,0.14501937,0.0024455646,0.00018621178,0.0001371239,0.0026686164,0.0012693007,0.001275518,0.0020070733,0.8446413,0.0001730977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99532133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14375666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14375666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41946545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128186374","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v9i2.445","title":"Postscript to “Employment Class Actions: Is the Work Culture of Banks Under Attack?”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Overtime; Legislation; Class action; Working class; Class (philosophy); Work (physics); Labour law; Financial services","score_opus":0.11703182975526079,"score_gpt":0.3876080377037702,"score_spread":0.27057620794850945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128186374","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025298072,0.016477661,0.0008980744,0.60543627,0.05508027,0.0011432281,0.0044504185,0.0003183493,0.3136659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034639534,0.010652648,0.0015272625,0.4854969,0.0137324715,0.0007239661,0.0015640681,0.00015525143,0.45150784],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910028,0.0008057302,0.0004900439,0.0006309155,0.0054440056,0.0016265047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98043597,0.0035611007,0.0004983619,0.000547462,0.01337246,0.0015846839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062413095,0.0007127282,0.0007118884,0.00184051,0.009843101,0.0047377804,0.0035227272,0.010891217,0.03320231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015815154,0.0005430645,0.00078219443,0.0013098046,0.006416145,0.002075086,0.0020877507,0.009729772,0.010629048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033926544,0.000006833419,0.00009181609,0.00007258299,0.0000015605592,0.00002611423,0.000402354,0.000014372357,0.00007437011,0.0056446777,0.99036026,0.003301635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012986027,0.000010430565,0.0024134263,0.00035189753,0.000011469071,0.000023005148,0.00089000876,0.000036369674,0.00016484,0.0011519217,0.99490696,0.000026687303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90915376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9322894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90915376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028939435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10840118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20997125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128187074","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i1.027","title":"Absent Foreign Claimants in Canadian Class Actions: Where to After <i>Airia Brands</i> ?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Plaintiff; Class (philosophy); Tort; Test (biology); Exclusive jurisdiction; Personal jurisdiction","score_opus":0.0371539470194358,"score_gpt":0.2867792209710797,"score_spread":0.2496252739516439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128187074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1670264,0.019495215,0.0037198574,0.23578247,0.0028743749,0.00035197177,0.0008976774,0.00009466725,0.56975734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8791212,0.004999586,0.0020347803,0.038617626,0.00050402444,0.00008240215,0.00033131783,0.000058398175,0.07425065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98214597,0.0013648592,0.00064584735,0.0017516323,0.008206488,0.005885301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719107,0.009533693,0.0014508165,0.00085848506,0.013478138,0.0027681913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016091304,0.00040701148,0.0006155047,0.0038351004,0.026330356,0.014547981,0.004484253,0.011323257,0.009211585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042992264,0.0005104231,0.0008370146,0.0029950722,0.011605558,0.004619325,0.003939744,0.01069451,0.0006242977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013829154,0.00007028032,0.013925432,0.0004710307,0.00006126907,0.0016155859,0.026374573,0.0005702973,0.0015099641,0.71461064,0.18228231,0.05837033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009997909,0.000062402156,0.044379648,0.0019381176,0.00044235008,0.0005216454,0.040113732,0.0016614997,0.0036011352,0.041930683,0.8648329,0.00041589676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9726218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.987507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09762555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09762555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17990547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7083263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128187123","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v6i2.381","title":"Class Arbitration in Canada: The Legal and Business Case","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Arbitration clause; Class action; Compulsory arbitration; Context (archaeology); Class (philosophy); Counterparty","score_opus":0.020661624698468228,"score_gpt":0.23688735763747992,"score_spread":0.2162257329390117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128187123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07457194,0.092604496,0.0031167474,0.11732324,0.0010279815,0.00026113458,0.00067515695,0.00006734486,0.7103519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83560646,0.04688716,0.0038613235,0.028194146,0.00036797966,0.00015394941,0.00027999116,0.00003838131,0.08461068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99037546,0.00086907635,0.00029733096,0.00059497193,0.0052054804,0.0026577192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926563,0.0025466324,0.00046604124,0.00019916355,0.0030826365,0.0010493145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005258851,0.00033819166,0.00053577084,0.00386986,0.018034996,0.0105208075,0.0026846973,0.007911134,0.0038800822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01564826,0.0004276545,0.00065182615,0.0063905246,0.007999376,0.002152875,0.0023909654,0.003958307,0.00034970886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037634527,0.000033148055,0.003056341,0.00022319793,0.00002416331,0.0016814695,0.0038493513,0.0011470431,0.00031069963,0.91276836,0.044540193,0.03232841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008598016,0.000038333194,0.019651253,0.00077578437,0.00013813691,0.0010196283,0.0070593143,0.0024278315,0.00062769203,0.06614684,0.9018262,0.00020306262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14710377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14710377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24427412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98923874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128189067","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v10i1-2.185","title":"The Evolution and Devolution of Aggregate Damages as a Common Issue","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Class action; Punitive damages; Devolution (biology); Aggregate (composite); Economic Justice; Eminent domain; Class (philosophy)","score_opus":0.03548926773429586,"score_gpt":0.28198495440637217,"score_spread":0.2464956866720763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128189067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018521475,0.2269522,0.015571199,0.1803532,0.0040109917,0.00045071723,0.00048028727,0.00014022864,0.55351955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61731184,0.16061482,0.022377592,0.08571964,0.0033287436,0.00037107363,0.00038519042,0.00023799748,0.10965303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93855256,0.009530915,0.0021531223,0.0049784095,0.03936166,0.0054233633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93529326,0.01707782,0.003529825,0.0035298856,0.037539773,0.0030293656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04438821,0.00059340236,0.0011147722,0.010539181,0.00947213,0.022969022,0.0065115793,0.008789758,0.0040920554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063562065,0.0008559015,0.0010093143,0.008954824,0.027723748,0.0073270467,0.00476663,0.013325016,0.00057806005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016128071,0.000016701159,0.0005065364,0.00040765165,0.000023662955,0.00011650136,0.001484799,0.0005547677,0.00026806086,0.91933525,0.029018031,0.048251912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002344564,0.000050717066,0.005711746,0.0015912019,0.00005968628,0.00014637994,0.001320155,0.0005906019,0.0005578183,0.045831364,0.9440201,0.000096726966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8635275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89965904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8635275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12748511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19948031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92497355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128189478","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v12i2.235","title":"Class Actions and the “Mixed Law” Regimes that Have Embraced them: A Comparative Reflection on Class Actions in the South African and Quebec Legal Systems","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Context (archaeology); Phenomenon; Common law; Reflection (computer programming); Comparative law","score_opus":0.18128770299761926,"score_gpt":0.3335130219239389,"score_spread":0.15222531892631963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128189478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48798707,0.021931313,0.0028785344,0.05986884,0.00033706828,0.00018423499,0.00022881034,0.00003061092,0.4265535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856619,0.0024818566,0.00048647157,0.0024805826,0.000031822994,0.000026631793,0.00002272624,0.0000112230955,0.008796652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99184895,0.0025743693,0.00021283804,0.0005277993,0.0020984986,0.0027375808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844488,0.008072886,0.0012099361,0.00046149222,0.0048935073,0.0009134793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009436962,0.00028048575,0.0004152184,0.004088856,0.028642803,0.015574243,0.002127042,0.0043685376,0.005381951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014105515,0.00030974555,0.00042417357,0.0053008613,0.02437896,0.0037617483,0.00362672,0.0042109666,0.00016935311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037028574,0.000044255314,0.011064394,0.00021798484,0.000034868724,0.0011409865,0.11950367,0.00057600107,0.0006315636,0.82484674,0.010497169,0.031405352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004019912,0.00006633621,0.09959491,0.0019267749,0.00011913583,0.00078276545,0.30512935,0.0015138047,0.0013728157,0.029279344,0.5599463,0.00022827782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96803916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9845909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106834315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.106834315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08583484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7751408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128190094","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v5i1.3","title":"Fall From Grace? Is Quebec Still Canada’s Class Action Paradise?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Government (linguistics); Class action","score_opus":0.053721807438056206,"score_gpt":0.2553016390867715,"score_spread":0.2015798316487153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128190094","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013757251,0.121485256,0.0006553027,0.70488214,0.011261904,0.00013152361,0.0046016998,0.00014466302,0.14308022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32359,0.10954216,0.0033867676,0.360787,0.0036950323,0.0002810389,0.0027189031,0.00029366548,0.19570541],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892308,0.0011340216,0.00046209255,0.0007257423,0.005387592,0.0030597423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96020544,0.00482013,0.0014798163,0.00093009544,0.027457122,0.005107414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012459518,0.0005706455,0.0010957854,0.0044936673,0.014463328,0.01726803,0.0037269406,0.008367193,0.020386912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029368794,0.00059653714,0.0011488677,0.007256193,0.0059826346,0.0047533205,0.0019506894,0.009038592,0.0014902608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098154014,0.000039740797,0.0033917273,0.00056625804,0.000079568395,0.0001431319,0.0014787812,0.00018743254,0.00015871445,0.073511496,0.86578846,0.05455652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003473969,0.000010453632,0.009952501,0.0008912868,0.000080801095,0.000032584754,0.0029567752,0.000084484665,0.00012933805,0.002061907,0.9837082,0.00005699469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15690792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15690792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4605921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9778673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128190475","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i1.155","title":"Our Aging <i>CPA</i> : It’s Time for Ontario to “Opt-In” to a Modern Global Class-Actions Framework","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; CLARITY; Legislature; Enforcement; Settlement (finance); European union; Class (philosophy); Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.07128358913533174,"score_gpt":0.33445849614376033,"score_spread":0.2631749070084286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128190475","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009647694,0.01735702,0.0022494297,0.7593018,0.0052522058,0.00018031684,0.00065397524,0.00012447944,0.2052331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32383093,0.020356053,0.009192696,0.22720097,0.0025550209,0.00021258819,0.0006844529,0.0002712052,0.41569617],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902739,0.0010364632,0.00032009563,0.0008576543,0.005232179,0.0022796157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800811,0.0031142822,0.00066389784,0.00065487914,0.011811946,0.0036739071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008658729,0.0003527413,0.00040294975,0.0016812162,0.01772923,0.016594663,0.0024715695,0.007969181,0.011538048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014159808,0.0004049848,0.00048215405,0.001878683,0.011999472,0.0037458136,0.0022111738,0.006795002,0.0013709038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023708955,0.000017851986,0.0019073063,0.00018455727,0.000010160024,0.00019993896,0.0033667737,0.0002068438,0.00038938422,0.28360218,0.6860056,0.02408564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005614127,0.00000768055,0.0023301458,0.0002338987,0.0000134076045,0.000041267853,0.0018188057,0.00018270452,0.00024926275,0.006142393,0.9889417,0.00003308523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9802372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9897893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1610886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1610886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27275115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9730183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128190759","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v4i2.328","title":"Shareholder Class Actions in Ontario: Putting John C. Coffee, Jr.’s Findings to the Test","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Class (philosophy); Shareholder; Class action; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.09443692777461131,"score_gpt":0.2707779425995156,"score_spread":0.17634101482490427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128190759","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04192321,0.15456231,0.0008332708,0.604438,0.0050201835,0.00031727916,0.0054306444,0.00008016517,0.18739492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57311153,0.16414751,0.003284361,0.13621573,0.0031376043,0.00036699473,0.0028320358,0.00015328119,0.116751015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820172,0.0016335468,0.0007998073,0.00072716543,0.011445665,0.0033766367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91074526,0.019404564,0.005321578,0.0023936485,0.05544654,0.006688333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0155999465,0.0004195637,0.00075834227,0.0041956403,0.012393668,0.008724352,0.002874982,0.005156357,0.005248522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047022827,0.0006104617,0.00069154025,0.008897021,0.0052567814,0.0030741156,0.0020084735,0.004313633,0.0005006004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017744246,0.00004020809,0.0173589,0.0018707563,0.0001254905,0.00026940854,0.008418038,0.00044035865,0.00041958533,0.076442674,0.82677305,0.06766406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008864304,0.000036646037,0.09594844,0.001759196,0.00022302697,0.000057490673,0.0077080694,0.0002136327,0.0005031539,0.004328778,0.88901615,0.0001166494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15460971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15460971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40005943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9805329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128190817","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v10i1-2.119","title":"Pre-Dispute Mandatory Arbitration Clauses — the Not-So-Secret Weapon of “Class” Destruction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Arbitration; Supreme court; Legislature; Consumer protection; Economic Justice; Class (philosophy); Arbitration clause; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.05800141014158415,"score_gpt":0.28208660878496344,"score_spread":0.22408519864337928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128190817","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075278147,0.59899646,0.00434444,0.06673882,0.0028585226,0.0001692126,0.0002745235,0.00006834812,0.31902176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36963928,0.47988284,0.007960853,0.040892743,0.0018266072,0.00015550753,0.00051690533,0.0001313819,0.09899386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9719668,0.003349667,0.00087931077,0.0015327338,0.019389851,0.0028817004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811075,0.006512876,0.0012480543,0.0007153534,0.009847303,0.00056900876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012311056,0.0005400494,0.0005633171,0.0044915606,0.007146469,0.007634059,0.0031543286,0.0036193582,0.0044245725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019183617,0.0004181325,0.0006373182,0.0043374104,0.012317104,0.0028430314,0.0016890004,0.0044346936,0.0006605041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026882877,0.00002375566,0.0005746579,0.0014837367,0.000027911256,0.00025986953,0.0034339568,0.0003110587,0.00092860806,0.744955,0.115996785,0.13197784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010118914,0.00001425543,0.0019835574,0.0012152534,0.000026898164,0.00009403678,0.00078023714,0.0000799303,0.0005933507,0.008863376,0.9863105,0.000028614111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8831244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9238139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8831244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06450747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1324211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46803665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128191023","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i2.437","title":"Ontario and Her Sisters: Should Full Faith and Credit Apply to the National Class?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Faith; Payment","score_opus":0.06900179096282248,"score_gpt":0.32141129788359535,"score_spread":0.25240950692077285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128191023","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01602759,0.06671305,0.00026524632,0.73063964,0.0055702566,0.00015197195,0.0014142524,0.000046159184,0.17917177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35487497,0.08098337,0.0016122871,0.31576008,0.0031138614,0.0003745723,0.0011451908,0.00011736358,0.24201836],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98843455,0.0011786728,0.00048412321,0.0005757182,0.0062421397,0.0030846333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97865844,0.0040919757,0.0009722335,0.0006033098,0.010698691,0.0049753385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011480745,0.000415159,0.0009923914,0.0028161404,0.015785893,0.009158651,0.0034969905,0.011421924,0.011005093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027093839,0.00058957224,0.0005770535,0.004914734,0.0070340247,0.0031766545,0.0024704118,0.0078688925,0.00082653126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008308259,0.000028201832,0.003968713,0.00079160626,0.0000529705,0.0001602247,0.004824926,0.00010330185,0.00018661591,0.10759676,0.83376604,0.04843754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004912605,0.000013652198,0.01873244,0.0010677606,0.00007891342,0.000038271595,0.004979526,0.00004246011,0.000120273646,0.0037869413,0.9710472,0.000043390817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.987107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99614906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101833515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.101833515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39444226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7388573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128191121","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v6i1.157","title":"Speaking the Class Action, Thinking the Class Action: A Discussion of Changing Trends in Quebec’s Class Action Lexicon","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Lexicon; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.04750860282431501,"score_gpt":0.3010396428241762,"score_spread":0.2535310399998612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128191121","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014634068,0.31806374,0.0031632495,0.52118546,0.006262234,0.0001069102,0.0031731585,0.00014937302,0.13326178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47222295,0.2641404,0.009698292,0.13924745,0.0048621586,0.000393299,0.0030340084,0.0004923151,0.10590913],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99045485,0.0017520401,0.00052973547,0.0006811253,0.0051083528,0.001473764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598577,0.01295358,0.0014064572,0.00069499825,0.023702752,0.0013844342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01469652,0.0007124898,0.0011138964,0.01761046,0.020407706,0.019406889,0.0058893817,0.0054674414,0.011125438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028410409,0.00068279303,0.0008216031,0.029842747,0.012622018,0.0075487015,0.0020279603,0.0069893915,0.0007735272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004418596,0.000025404152,0.002754618,0.0010297031,0.00004847818,0.00021238883,0.015426156,0.0004655512,0.00033237843,0.31812134,0.58338386,0.07815601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015738227,0.000009372092,0.012219177,0.0011420404,0.0000507641,0.000079805504,0.0076919124,0.0003329437,0.00015582689,0.0063974657,0.97182286,0.00008211907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99638224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99797875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21994862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21994862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29261714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90474904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128191485","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i2.227","title":"Class Proceedings and the Future of Boilerplate in Consumer Contracts: Unconscionability as a Common Law Solution to Class Action Avoidance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Boilerplate text; Class action; Legislature; Consumer protection; Legislation; Common law; Framing (construction)","score_opus":0.020900594890051083,"score_gpt":0.2799083363679617,"score_spread":0.2590077414779106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128191485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04971,0.0025208048,0.10632905,0.17206855,0.0012089348,0.00021989754,0.00005463794,0.00014212933,0.66774595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9186462,0.0008432563,0.013347682,0.01865994,0.0009063287,0.00024831656,0.000031852243,0.000102136386,0.047214363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97861564,0.008528955,0.0007444314,0.0025020393,0.007189958,0.0024190089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96384335,0.022911318,0.002246203,0.004152344,0.00519707,0.0016497528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02844337,0.00045233354,0.0006906682,0.0016044916,0.011448623,0.017206091,0.0036254819,0.021727907,0.00954238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04416625,0.00063728506,0.001244199,0.001130493,0.04692564,0.0146294795,0.008935256,0.022320712,0.00097377383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035606033,0.000007062532,0.000072525734,0.0000041645503,0.0000013350965,0.000030083953,0.00041761715,0.0001207241,0.000032702632,0.9969258,0.0011068735,0.0012777451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002885613,0.00002588199,0.00024109567,0.00017898486,0.000018180774,0.00006867413,0.000800763,0.002717874,0.0004325463,0.93737435,0.05806502,0.000047652775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02924064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026027836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02924064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016223643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02115977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15042472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128193979","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v2i2_279","title":"Les Recours Collectifs Et Le Droit International Privé Au Québec","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.05604269264827971,"score_gpt":0.36310665143519066,"score_spread":0.30706395878691095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128193979","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029695055,0.76492596,0.00069217384,0.049802836,0.0033350594,0.00016093177,0.004155959,0.000054935143,0.14717706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3792063,0.495815,0.0016926293,0.0134073375,0.0008877988,0.00026847195,0.0028089709,0.00008071768,0.105832756],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99261004,0.0012481555,0.0003998166,0.0004087998,0.00395022,0.001382915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98251224,0.004049942,0.0012399565,0.00026998567,0.010934385,0.0009934288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007896992,0.0006292336,0.0009380561,0.0088092685,0.00566969,0.0061579156,0.0019927486,0.0019797846,0.007963479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014568578,0.00045983752,0.00063072116,0.0143879475,0.0026752492,0.0015138505,0.00095023104,0.0028139534,0.00040033087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029721943,0.000097830794,0.019073961,0.006435412,0.00045428713,0.00030721942,0.005570404,0.002462125,0.000492974,0.15710743,0.4685655,0.3391357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004517297,0.000031649608,0.056332704,0.004108851,0.00020474175,0.000062027895,0.0031376358,0.000204128,0.00030391206,0.0013958092,0.93411803,0.0000553908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9925781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08295029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08295029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21366201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60184926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128194070","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v12i2.261","title":"Class Action Case Study: From Certification to Trial in <i>Jer V Samji</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Adjudication; Class (philosophy); Settlement (finance); Action (physics); Certification","score_opus":0.16633741762298207,"score_gpt":0.3629355441518282,"score_spread":0.19659812652884615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128194070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37367827,0.019659342,0.0067589427,0.051854253,0.0014415991,0.0019494746,0.000937485,0.0001812477,0.5435394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9343075,0.0060798656,0.003240737,0.010559823,0.00018442371,0.0003281919,0.00042838985,0.0000440621,0.044827066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98417354,0.0035340441,0.00066239416,0.00097438,0.0067278785,0.00392774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972639,0.013491943,0.0016793332,0.00075682113,0.008826252,0.0026065072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012669171,0.0004135977,0.00041194292,0.0032224627,0.02205166,0.006655016,0.0034011395,0.0072161937,0.005290588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028851794,0.00039822483,0.00052151625,0.0042416616,0.0049212985,0.0017123406,0.0028808617,0.0065064295,0.0006044221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044688734,0.0018270336,0.042913597,0.0018466206,0.00012580896,0.03344383,0.10875459,0.0035805563,0.0025801067,0.26337516,0.29555613,0.24554965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020475077,0.00046650195,0.056879353,0.0017047204,0.00021665008,0.005627925,0.07671897,0.0018262303,0.0033407088,0.008279585,0.8444651,0.00026950656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85288554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94166064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14711446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046924893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09105545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3404655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128195410","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v10i1-2.3","title":"Guest Editor’s Introduction: The Past, Present, and Future of Class Actions in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Control (management); World class","score_opus":0.03436668423072999,"score_gpt":0.2529450624543814,"score_spread":0.21857837822365142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128195410","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029409217,0.037367925,0.00012226852,0.43326882,0.5249455,0.000029955074,0.0004817427,0.00003620557,0.0034535278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011395769,0.069120884,0.00045792313,0.3884639,0.50086755,0.00008119506,0.000452736,0.00010507873,0.029054957],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913967,0.00057427416,0.0008657036,0.00073473516,0.0051805926,0.001248018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9262151,0.01085134,0.0030676925,0.00077505707,0.0527972,0.006293629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076950532,0.0011892568,0.0018240606,0.0049735196,0.006064747,0.009130463,0.0039334767,0.01170681,0.010700485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043919183,0.0006177256,0.0013278737,0.005062887,0.0037785713,0.003089482,0.0016185374,0.013615251,0.0018529464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008509523,0.0000029530177,0.000111230234,0.000105515646,0.000004408131,0.000025558884,0.00003369631,0.000012935848,0.000011170833,0.00044247328,0.996938,0.0023034245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020585478,0.0000087635335,0.002083935,0.00097386754,0.000038636997,0.000081829705,0.00039304415,0.00007865795,0.000050085553,0.00043384207,0.9957931,0.000043633394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64893323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8593105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35106677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029710837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09127991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70626855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128195529","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i2.203","title":"A Real and Substantial Look at Jurisdiction in the Civil and Class Action Settings","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre de réadaptation Lethbridge-Layton-Mackay","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Original jurisdiction; Statutory law; Class action; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Civil procedure","score_opus":0.03344623111615447,"score_gpt":0.310251943957258,"score_spread":0.27680571284110356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128195529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09559697,0.019817239,0.01100329,0.13681579,0.0006367851,0.000096878364,0.00014503277,0.000034982073,0.7358531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98707134,0.0015162207,0.0011835035,0.004423248,0.00013464772,0.000028765486,0.000019482346,0.000009539603,0.005613215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781245,0.009144873,0.00052424194,0.00205428,0.005047992,0.005104029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858518,0.009001678,0.0009272704,0.00089777115,0.0015509394,0.0017705916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012683614,0.0002900541,0.00068157795,0.00282768,0.019233963,0.015538315,0.0031722847,0.0076124985,0.0056551816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021892454,0.0004164131,0.0006871249,0.0021656859,0.08068017,0.008927511,0.008469912,0.012234912,0.00029615188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020354091,0.0000048621678,0.00039797314,0.00001573296,0.0000031392876,0.00009277929,0.0047791656,0.00005302056,0.000055631303,0.99011844,0.001022453,0.0034548193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024053035,0.000060833085,0.010500591,0.000711716,0.000039324317,0.0005653941,0.03227796,0.0004206038,0.0003995023,0.76675135,0.18813552,0.000113042595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41079926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6070435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41079926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031868454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044269994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81681633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128195635","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i2.191","title":"Judicial Scrutiny of Third Party Litigation Funding Agreements in Canadian Class Actions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Commodification; Third party; Subordination (linguistics); Class (philosophy); Demise; Culpability","score_opus":0.08359834846464893,"score_gpt":0.3160594635228563,"score_spread":0.23246111505820738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128195635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42556676,0.055246025,0.002787615,0.10042095,0.0017112474,0.00052066357,0.0010250827,0.00011142677,0.4126102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97471434,0.0058632432,0.0008319341,0.0063547045,0.0002252473,0.00004448824,0.00011208999,0.000014840413,0.011839063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9586572,0.0040489677,0.0014800249,0.0022137107,0.025363274,0.008236838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8867811,0.041311752,0.009303698,0.0018673276,0.05600052,0.0047357087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031215675,0.00028050767,0.0005495831,0.010349953,0.01875577,0.01344073,0.00386678,0.006299366,0.0035827293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07972658,0.00044849893,0.00057314907,0.009924708,0.009150454,0.0016044147,0.0029008607,0.0046108216,0.00021841338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036731383,0.00020347489,0.118814945,0.0020015303,0.00022575646,0.0028123003,0.07330504,0.0032194513,0.0042193076,0.43704858,0.14497925,0.21280305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001143507,0.00015494743,0.30130374,0.0025429402,0.00047254295,0.00048206223,0.0320031,0.002805908,0.0057963883,0.015048041,0.638881,0.00039501232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97785723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9880696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14181748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14181748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18948965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128195647","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i1.73","title":"From Edmonds to Campbell: A Principled Basis for Pre-Certification Costs","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Class action; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.06430372801353139,"score_gpt":0.31973176599779374,"score_spread":0.25542803798426233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128195647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014049536,0.011586182,0.04804525,0.16411042,0.0024635878,0.00038580867,0.00040660426,0.0001871501,0.7587655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6916573,0.00502726,0.0437019,0.0730798,0.00093870464,0.00039447285,0.0001591612,0.00017679896,0.18486461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804448,0.0037101505,0.00074396946,0.0023942562,0.010043875,0.0026629867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98914206,0.0045315595,0.0004770256,0.0007590146,0.0043389816,0.0007512819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014574242,0.00055980374,0.0006963335,0.0031266164,0.013214487,0.016380645,0.0041298848,0.012023732,0.0050325617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026701882,0.00075705413,0.00086445827,0.002042235,0.028021147,0.0058608805,0.0038812878,0.012301151,0.0007311309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003846222,0.000002950531,0.0001064943,0.000018206643,0.0000016449625,0.000034368997,0.0008642669,0.00009080362,0.000036774887,0.98566794,0.00991186,0.0032608258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036278692,0.000027205302,0.0013635036,0.00066428,0.00004006245,0.00012700752,0.002217338,0.00093703874,0.0005433039,0.53530514,0.45863968,0.000099256285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74042416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8197198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74042416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059404045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10422428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52220905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128195747","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i2.327","title":"À la Frontière de L’inconnu : Une Analyse des Recours Collectifs Multi-Ressorts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Legislation; Class (philosophy); Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Action (physics); Proposition","score_opus":0.09046652595244307,"score_gpt":0.288166318305136,"score_spread":0.19769979235269292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128195747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40373412,0.027559271,0.00758476,0.013630778,0.00019211168,0.00016679113,0.0005718025,0.000052017796,0.5465084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92290574,0.006892828,0.0030429338,0.00070202915,0.00010903666,0.00005514054,0.00019906017,0.000055230536,0.06603797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98948133,0.0021423064,0.00018550295,0.0006783844,0.005168964,0.0023435473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99261284,0.0031133424,0.0010207522,0.00033364136,0.0023902946,0.0005292584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005979233,0.0004569926,0.0007051149,0.007069795,0.014601421,0.013810119,0.0020522976,0.0016810073,0.009987336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011178053,0.00036551073,0.000759865,0.012259259,0.010219062,0.0035047373,0.00369508,0.0025013934,0.00064135005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007561318,0.000040557938,0.017056994,0.00031585924,0.00004994658,0.0017323347,0.08318825,0.001224345,0.00040677813,0.7901677,0.012117566,0.093623966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028396396,0.00006592268,0.11584736,0.0010618399,0.000084783984,0.0013367332,0.16391316,0.0020801297,0.0006604281,0.038790297,0.67603177,0.000099166675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8907077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9419625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10929233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05211931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048716906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37815386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128196997","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i1.121","title":"“The Sport of Kings”: Financing Class Actions in Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Settlement (finance); Class action; Statutory law; Class (philosophy); Certification","score_opus":0.059440071946710034,"score_gpt":0.27002095233322393,"score_spread":0.2105808803865139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128196997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06855159,0.12834905,0.0016555958,0.13194174,0.0019156581,0.00044902842,0.000999479,0.00006784275,0.6660701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6362394,0.10272696,0.0025479782,0.027702231,0.00060774473,0.00017684678,0.00048237725,0.00006742758,0.22944897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906441,0.0008392758,0.00038823095,0.00048999826,0.0056133945,0.0020250585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916859,0.0020100616,0.00080677896,0.0003596731,0.0040267017,0.001110853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050638355,0.00030697064,0.00031120869,0.0022461913,0.01354727,0.0068438426,0.0024019228,0.0052028485,0.005273604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011810031,0.00043364495,0.00048891414,0.004116553,0.007455952,0.0020538413,0.0019326758,0.0028367862,0.00036788615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007127606,0.000059198228,0.006736798,0.0016972453,0.000035257905,0.00159272,0.018923191,0.00081145903,0.0010862804,0.6318156,0.21235578,0.12481517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016582657,0.000029463215,0.0148546435,0.00065019925,0.00003103214,0.00016585828,0.003764186,0.00015468392,0.0003289078,0.0040368363,0.97592473,0.000042896412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98722947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14145729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14145729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29080358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99578786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128197607","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v9i1_203","title":"Employment Class Actions: Is the Work Culture of Banks Under Attack?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Overtime; Legislation; Class action; Working class; Work (physics); Labour law; Class (philosophy)","score_opus":0.10146566321663016,"score_gpt":0.3661194180389201,"score_spread":0.26465375482229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128197607","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03998457,0.39097923,0.00050874066,0.36163443,0.0029464215,0.00013195748,0.00083883037,0.000036825542,0.20293899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5107618,0.3729332,0.00089570245,0.08501442,0.0015093437,0.00013638612,0.00053780933,0.00006199372,0.028149266],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98369217,0.00360417,0.0005058093,0.000754561,0.008174552,0.0032688372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735145,0.006134733,0.002914465,0.00086755556,0.013241385,0.0033273746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015072309,0.0003548042,0.00073343865,0.0036196795,0.009264901,0.011456732,0.00278534,0.003178482,0.005272166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022730237,0.00032621832,0.0004092404,0.007899713,0.012430175,0.0035270283,0.0019953516,0.0037059782,0.0006080637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008777533,0.00008907481,0.01830653,0.0047876723,0.00010213529,0.00023519239,0.045157865,0.00026023173,0.0003915192,0.18237367,0.33592868,0.41227967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028776363,0.000041746316,0.065570466,0.00865783,0.000096139076,0.00008884419,0.045497097,0.00005950955,0.00021440943,0.0050693518,0.87460715,0.00006868968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9609852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9806013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095468365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.095468365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21808359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6926747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128198056","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v4i1.164","title":"Cross-Border Collaboration by Class Counsel in the U.S. and Ontario","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Government (linguistics); World class; Control (management); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03440152151656529,"score_gpt":0.42006789353274615,"score_spread":0.38566637201618087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128198056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6650638,0.1649896,0.00054169784,0.05796127,0.0012123178,0.0006940122,0.002473421,0.00008415263,0.10697971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.941027,0.038180806,0.00056569994,0.0041333083,0.00010244553,0.00017797874,0.0006201846,0.000026287917,0.015166446],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933356,0.0014342667,0.00026224967,0.00039915126,0.002651605,0.0019169725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759512,0.0032521016,0.0019716474,0.0004487964,0.012894532,0.005481642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069203386,0.00016674958,0.00047358833,0.0019774672,0.0078017507,0.002598496,0.001968598,0.0009969035,0.0043281633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015536024,0.0002451887,0.00021589012,0.0046818024,0.0012969793,0.0008180489,0.0022156644,0.000986229,0.00022279352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006050152,0.00029428216,0.14858098,0.0038078274,0.00022593865,0.00057332794,0.08927464,0.00047259088,0.0010046244,0.01030601,0.1434827,0.601372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014553791,0.00024740642,0.58246243,0.0047104736,0.00023796732,0.00027832692,0.09239131,0.00025016285,0.00081252557,0.00056160346,0.31785077,0.00005144066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9841106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07469912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07469912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25816283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5419826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128198943","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v6i2.355","title":"Fee Agreements and fee Approval in Ontario Class Proceedings","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class (philosophy); Class action; American rule; Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.03022811317696147,"score_gpt":0.24130449037040305,"score_spread":0.21107637719344158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128198943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09768022,0.02430456,0.0048402105,0.04105714,0.0006631323,0.0003429601,0.00045394377,0.00007674458,0.83058125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8771465,0.009182046,0.0031784198,0.0045694443,0.00038431727,0.00012081081,0.00015381072,0.000057469984,0.10520714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95879763,0.0069070132,0.0023038003,0.0017264091,0.02520966,0.005055385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95671344,0.020811846,0.005415807,0.0014374264,0.01388959,0.0017318438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019491674,0.00022665468,0.00042892463,0.0057146843,0.0111788325,0.01321927,0.0025316796,0.00417025,0.010397038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061858702,0.0006373901,0.0004813002,0.0055515096,0.009489454,0.0040704934,0.003177967,0.0034487909,0.00065491843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041512256,0.000044337943,0.0064049936,0.00028001313,0.000019279287,0.00046143046,0.008577036,0.0010372524,0.0003927579,0.8765797,0.03623005,0.069931604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054532367,0.000101933714,0.06679364,0.0009799107,0.00007867735,0.0003423303,0.009560503,0.0019392559,0.0012032528,0.058009893,0.8607002,0.00023586092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8779166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9359198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122083426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09564553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09015983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6939602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128200143","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v14i1.171","title":"Comparing the Reports of the Ontario Law Reform Commission and the Attorney General’s Advisory Committee","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law reform; Advisory committee; Reform Act; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.10397769389845003,"score_gpt":0.3675786213985325,"score_spread":0.26360092750008246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128200143","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066080816,0.024896998,0.0016322607,0.4392138,0.0123800505,0.0019192274,0.029592052,0.00037373847,0.42391098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46133083,0.023884838,0.003966575,0.1367092,0.0064370674,0.0015628848,0.019787367,0.0005136379,0.34580758],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8730003,0.007747656,0.0052827494,0.0032633147,0.10078907,0.009916801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5579679,0.0803125,0.0195433,0.0068603144,0.32319143,0.012124564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05872387,0.0006602744,0.0010797576,0.020471852,0.008788441,0.013137664,0.0039536078,0.0067984425,0.010726492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21058398,0.0012382341,0.001239907,0.020437745,0.0039890427,0.0025116976,0.0028106796,0.0049653915,0.0012698077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014613553,0.000042620635,0.017327502,0.0010208503,0.00015176386,0.000116918454,0.0039966395,0.00022676282,0.0002872034,0.019772645,0.93777096,0.01914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008779265,0.00004710082,0.13613193,0.0010013884,0.00035112875,0.00004031518,0.0048283753,0.00032477986,0.00082642335,0.0011650637,0.85506445,0.00013121111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9653468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9850044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14048369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14048369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31546068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99691707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128200726","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v11i1.47","title":"The Rise of Personal Health Information Class Actions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Personally identifiable information; Damages; Context (archaeology); Legislation; Health care; Information privacy; Confidentiality; Privacy law","score_opus":0.2378310205739705,"score_gpt":0.49523762960796336,"score_spread":0.2574066090339929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128200726","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020991736,0.8791281,0.00052167964,0.063964784,0.001786074,0.00005404932,0.0002163881,0.000027670163,0.052202016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05933523,0.88775533,0.001371148,0.03853625,0.0015721068,0.0000445607,0.00024474008,0.000034081066,0.011106538],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97704244,0.0033829336,0.0009983762,0.0017007675,0.0150066465,0.0018688035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9478243,0.016537474,0.003962628,0.0011755809,0.028589457,0.0019104604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015503227,0.0006335184,0.0009743534,0.010072589,0.004889923,0.006273867,0.0030201727,0.0060819453,0.008319904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032187164,0.0006064305,0.0014012053,0.009810012,0.008451095,0.0035598492,0.0021267626,0.0077564833,0.0008068552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058509373,0.000055957484,0.0021862208,0.0073398193,0.00013215542,0.00046017807,0.0023553479,0.0005332938,0.00049263606,0.19617097,0.24079812,0.54941684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011949916,0.000032979646,0.004780929,0.0055701393,0.000080379075,0.0002508073,0.00054850895,0.00006211836,0.00017891341,0.0029699053,0.98547447,0.000038937716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84371835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90049744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15628165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06690138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13327098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48540574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128201105","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v9i2.419","title":"Putting A Price on Legal Services: Determining Reasonable Class Counsel Fees in the Settlement Context","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Res judicata; Settlement (finance); Class (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Substantive law; New class","score_opus":0.026246108506656467,"score_gpt":0.2562751822815091,"score_spread":0.23002907377485263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128201105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2691826,0.008954454,0.12133248,0.04393717,0.0006951952,0.0011733709,0.000832491,0.00019585772,0.55369645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97132283,0.0010541059,0.018313468,0.0015021459,0.00014236457,0.00009771248,0.00006909426,0.00003531646,0.0074630524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96169865,0.014830302,0.0016776326,0.0019157814,0.01487414,0.00500354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95384663,0.02394103,0.003570999,0.001788348,0.015356976,0.0014960507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029426044,0.0008078773,0.0014164838,0.011592296,0.00734462,0.019368593,0.0036191915,0.006749457,0.005930524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.101783454,0.0006696255,0.0008140005,0.0052653532,0.012332749,0.0082878,0.0044897506,0.0056904377,0.00059686415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048123642,0.00004089634,0.010196091,0.00010882231,0.00004488758,0.00057770626,0.002146007,0.0123754805,0.00027562297,0.92277956,0.007914296,0.043492377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013276313,0.00020693579,0.06388749,0.0026316515,0.00030242724,0.00070758676,0.016300691,0.070169725,0.0022184493,0.6985713,0.14435168,0.0005193363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5622736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7408543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43772638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059002757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058939558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88060844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128201199","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i1.3","title":"Le Recours Collectif et la <i>Loi sur la Protection du Consommateur</i> : Complicité, Utilité, Complémentarité","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Consumer protection; Class action; Alliance; Class (philosophy); Supreme court","score_opus":0.0436673516578199,"score_gpt":0.2648705012976714,"score_spread":0.22120314963985152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128201199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2565998,0.009592725,0.009491782,0.0389907,0.00079157937,0.00020865534,0.0009233022,0.00021921284,0.68318224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72477216,0.002024233,0.0028452892,0.003494826,0.00027761553,0.00018870088,0.00023216869,0.00010536082,0.26605964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99073505,0.0024957657,0.00016994058,0.0007201483,0.0043098954,0.0015692709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941227,0.0026474802,0.00062688865,0.00063463516,0.0015689242,0.00039932947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005692254,0.00067944743,0.0005035657,0.0011233253,0.008998074,0.010345587,0.0015213607,0.0033058848,0.021040674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008197143,0.000356102,0.0006504268,0.0016189488,0.009313699,0.0028154547,0.0024586094,0.004900804,0.0019373188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029621169,0.00017864097,0.009195479,0.00023559976,0.0000626307,0.0005017031,0.020451779,0.0006400471,0.0039749914,0.8389905,0.032209963,0.09326248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013437081,0.00023670982,0.05475584,0.00047488767,0.00008886452,0.0002973217,0.009621178,0.0011398538,0.0063424367,0.030185958,0.89651245,0.00020996002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77687126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79071766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22312874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032031633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03858554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44888556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128201290","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i1.103","title":"Whither Common Law Claims for Secondary Market Misrepresentation?: An Analysis of Certification Decisions in <i>McCann V CP Ships, Silver V Imax, Mckenna V Gammon Gold, and Dobbie V Arctic Glacier</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Statutory law; Common law; Jurisprudence; Meaning (existential); Cause of action; Certification; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.11737825005482269,"score_gpt":0.36785129838043035,"score_spread":0.2504730483256077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128201290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4157786,0.03737721,0.0031838478,0.115767404,0.00072833104,0.00050915894,0.00082847814,0.00004943581,0.4257775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95661604,0.009017781,0.0005859907,0.009572753,0.0003173224,0.00011201819,0.00020574554,0.000026610462,0.02354567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97982854,0.00350792,0.0005773018,0.0014298444,0.008868074,0.005788355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9557779,0.024396127,0.006763177,0.00085455284,0.010773865,0.0014343647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014650555,0.00032789801,0.0007865368,0.00899157,0.009294026,0.010483634,0.0028892595,0.005420397,0.005514999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0481093,0.0004817069,0.0010616801,0.008622258,0.015955416,0.004640163,0.0029264954,0.0044442676,0.00041009157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000734488,0.000082952,0.01924718,0.0005508198,0.00008145415,0.001514376,0.06365783,0.00042645767,0.00026798667,0.836409,0.03884169,0.038846932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014483534,0.00017531027,0.27845693,0.0032420715,0.0006386124,0.0010875426,0.13661967,0.0023711508,0.0013820963,0.14014176,0.43550298,0.00023705253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8063244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86893076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19367558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061399523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.085639894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44548678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128201749","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v9i2.227","title":"Foreign Classes Bringing Canadian Actions: Lessons from the Case Against Anvil Mining Limited","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Civil procedure; Democracy; Class (philosophy); Res judicata; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.09238303009292376,"score_gpt":0.27274485932103953,"score_spread":0.18036182922811578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128201749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21631901,0.008463528,0.001234589,0.11218734,0.0006816898,0.00019142753,0.00052458677,0.0000619837,0.6603357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85557795,0.007938648,0.0011154077,0.029671585,0.0002532217,0.00007367056,0.00020952272,0.00004720621,0.1051128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639124,0.00027495553,0.000060275368,0.0003132395,0.0010003572,0.0019599672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973889,0.00066648726,0.0001415519,0.000081270446,0.0008991715,0.0008225476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016343155,0.00073465303,0.0004798014,0.0017403075,0.048081633,0.009000864,0.002939792,0.009456319,0.0075897295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004669287,0.0005122364,0.00080319145,0.0026006226,0.008407084,0.0021753511,0.0032684433,0.010255409,0.00053123466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013331193,0.00019965385,0.030285766,0.00030088067,0.00010702173,0.019167878,0.089329615,0.0016934338,0.0010469798,0.6662328,0.14280698,0.04869568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010093414,0.00008588182,0.04450723,0.00092539116,0.0003352093,0.00401189,0.16240259,0.0019057702,0.0012255964,0.02008449,0.76403755,0.0003774291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14021835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14021835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13605861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99722487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128202534","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v1i2.201","title":"Navigating Between Scylla and Charybdis: Strike Suits, Continuous Disclosure, and the Private Right of Action in Ontario’s Secondary Market","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Secondary market; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Private sector","score_opus":0.038645878859542016,"score_gpt":0.2666268064883514,"score_spread":0.2279809276288094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128202534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36159784,0.03461542,0.001360317,0.15416653,0.00038763872,0.0001841831,0.0012278457,0.000039751292,0.44642043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95509803,0.0068614506,0.00024677216,0.005400301,0.00013750787,0.000025072532,0.000139988,0.000011247532,0.03207959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911624,0.0009614845,0.00031393478,0.00036587438,0.0037472877,0.0034489415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813912,0.0070366086,0.002239529,0.0005544812,0.006629186,0.0021490173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00705976,0.0001941365,0.0004770058,0.0027143555,0.009921503,0.009829062,0.0015890389,0.0045524407,0.007972638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02168126,0.00027956947,0.00038659154,0.0035831293,0.007252728,0.0027230436,0.0016751193,0.0030199357,0.00036030053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028785702,0.00015090585,0.06570611,0.0008054566,0.00009634855,0.00078293594,0.025461346,0.0012450957,0.0005469872,0.6305631,0.15293428,0.12141943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016150884,0.00009461992,0.24509801,0.0016529185,0.00025210655,0.00028901332,0.03794852,0.0017821301,0.00090104225,0.062403295,0.6492518,0.00016501518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9786411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06811893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06811893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16172092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49423975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128202985","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i1.101","title":"Carriage Motions in Ontario: Inconsistent Application of an Indeterminate Test","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carriage; Test (biology); Indeterminate; Consistency (knowledge bases); Settlement (finance); Predictability; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.07334546094157109,"score_gpt":0.3825966366259377,"score_spread":0.3092511756843666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128202985","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2590043,0.30252182,0.0071565937,0.12230111,0.0032783106,0.0010106375,0.0034601334,0.00013005295,0.30113712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92836255,0.05169424,0.00289807,0.0061458433,0.00030254317,0.0001419102,0.0005413727,0.000041310195,0.009872076],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9565635,0.005690755,0.003037412,0.0021151402,0.029467864,0.0031254217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85193235,0.04957888,0.01243632,0.0024571568,0.08114884,0.0024465106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037934206,0.00034692205,0.0008132344,0.007091273,0.0069724172,0.0067870454,0.002943403,0.0016772225,0.0023900408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08736189,0.00052105315,0.00057732256,0.011536538,0.009626017,0.0015857688,0.001885305,0.0020340793,0.00028561402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004286764,0.00008431147,0.12900357,0.0142867165,0.00039695043,0.001907322,0.060400598,0.002736111,0.0023031281,0.152941,0.15799505,0.47751656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008581987,0.00016929333,0.35323596,0.013065689,0.00070918706,0.00037773818,0.0343958,0.0017528445,0.0021830695,0.009641932,0.5840181,0.00036445959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97856563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99187577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14761275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14761275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22208649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128203871","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v12i2.125","title":"Is Class Action a Preferable Remedy for Independent Contractors? A Case Study on the Proposed Canadian Hockey League Class Action","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; League; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Certification; Face (sociological concept); Res judicata","score_opus":0.17674665294968334,"score_gpt":0.3498826448859137,"score_spread":0.17313599193623036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128203871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21471573,0.108542524,0.005012311,0.14202435,0.0022528612,0.0006785137,0.0004467999,0.000062343715,0.52626455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9153518,0.030243792,0.0025975632,0.017262679,0.00026415897,0.00013226824,0.00014380466,0.000022599937,0.033981387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97922426,0.005258913,0.00063504424,0.001404051,0.009163332,0.0043144436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98307866,0.008443894,0.0011784106,0.00052432524,0.005674479,0.0011003297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020257462,0.0004093358,0.00047403527,0.0028435315,0.022330096,0.009808173,0.0040162993,0.008451783,0.0045234216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020220276,0.00031508587,0.00061045325,0.0039223707,0.011997913,0.0021214564,0.0024315328,0.0054601864,0.00034710913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009396329,0.00020535532,0.016226918,0.0021460643,0.00008467814,0.006482778,0.052739337,0.0017148509,0.0010097874,0.66342676,0.12169193,0.13417754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007817331,0.000104335755,0.023474896,0.0042174538,0.00023125282,0.0015817964,0.07214026,0.00097026286,0.0012601322,0.008868328,0.88692385,0.00014931231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95180047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9833347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0895313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0895313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1573635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6495981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128204067","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v9i1_179","title":"The Pre-Authorization Disclosure of Legal Grounds: Why Recognition of the Right to Legal Particulars is Appropriate and Needed in the Quebec Class Action Context","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Petitioner; Class (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Scope (computer science); Liability; Class action; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.026422283169025763,"score_gpt":0.2493693327323341,"score_spread":0.22294704956330835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128204067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10374508,0.056143135,0.0052765585,0.39275438,0.001690965,0.0002458714,0.00052781793,0.00010277429,0.43951353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91324633,0.009693257,0.0020252152,0.029073358,0.00037257312,0.000057807378,0.000087308756,0.000058757418,0.04538529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97996324,0.005853209,0.0007132351,0.0016479148,0.0064986525,0.0053237616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95090586,0.018262569,0.002226976,0.0015296589,0.024611061,0.0024638837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023233363,0.0003113505,0.0005603135,0.0028765285,0.018860918,0.020104669,0.0031401585,0.009122521,0.006862611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04978008,0.00049208454,0.00047648113,0.0036383888,0.018644093,0.005748194,0.002630299,0.0077432836,0.00055458955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006607037,0.000043339718,0.007309214,0.00035475192,0.000027168366,0.0011298971,0.01739801,0.0005100641,0.000730109,0.79133004,0.117546916,0.06355445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006794958,0.000050946226,0.040054776,0.0020792878,0.00010168292,0.00048526455,0.029358156,0.0010782977,0.001109182,0.04316888,0.8821991,0.0002464387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98061347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13317515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13317515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1703862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96625787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128204436","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v12i1.69","title":"Expert Evidence in Class Actions Litigation: A Proposed Framework for a Reliability Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Economic Justice; Civil procedure; Civil litigation; Reliability (semiconductor); Rules of evidence","score_opus":0.37867528796028477,"score_gpt":0.5625808518127625,"score_spread":0.18390556385247775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128204436","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041379402,0.015125074,0.76494473,0.113319844,0.0012745211,0.0019856459,0.00037798643,0.00024039665,0.09859389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3375081,0.010017425,0.61256444,0.019849451,0.005624448,0.0039836913,0.00028262543,0.0001803974,0.009989473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.88555676,0.067922994,0.0074794204,0.008989961,0.02459435,0.0054565836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73736405,0.20491691,0.011504688,0.009006225,0.03306111,0.0041470495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15008819,0.0029918076,0.003930743,0.024473596,0.009305527,0.020031542,0.012398863,0.024005048,0.008926435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20333232,0.0023482486,0.00505249,0.010846126,0.045654394,0.026139682,0.012489088,0.0134265805,0.0017597307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013065406,0.000022614084,0.0006229074,0.00012791046,0.00003480495,0.00022895768,0.00058668613,0.0018594444,0.000048939117,0.98626316,0.0027293721,0.007462222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004901362,0.000056784073,0.0006443649,0.00064390484,0.0000833896,0.00022256958,0.0005005861,0.008365015,0.000075382944,0.9750499,0.0142349275,0.00007398006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047113407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03111818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15008819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021030493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044622615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7937517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128204548","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v5i2.268","title":"Narrowing Section 31(1): The Effects of the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in <i>Kerr V. Danier</i> On the Ontario Costs Regime","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Legislation","score_opus":0.021535546056113013,"score_gpt":0.2768654842428559,"score_spread":0.2553299381867429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128204548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046803422,0.006883685,0.0017470053,0.17083679,0.0024154054,0.00036270302,0.0028008746,0.00013815305,0.768012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61051893,0.0050946632,0.0030549197,0.19222184,0.0017084801,0.00033696266,0.00063271617,0.00019299492,0.18623842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9755938,0.0019975516,0.0005571218,0.001772824,0.013140003,0.006938742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837519,0.0060561914,0.00069793046,0.00067569176,0.007336359,0.0014819421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010779105,0.0008095125,0.0010913513,0.0038719336,0.021436261,0.01399001,0.004322652,0.015477528,0.008369618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034711234,0.0009597364,0.0015969253,0.003471105,0.0118424585,0.0028941983,0.0030446895,0.012213388,0.0009457483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100630066,0.00003640824,0.0027043424,0.00013551643,0.00005554533,0.0002927392,0.0034370855,0.00071897864,0.0006554056,0.751004,0.2319334,0.008925947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029030893,0.00007015688,0.03669859,0.0009070393,0.0005451542,0.00015966724,0.0045556095,0.0017118062,0.0026673432,0.089167066,0.86281365,0.00041368348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99581856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13907911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13907911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22306743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128204741","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i1.33","title":"Class Reunion: Revisiting Class Action Justification After Twenty Years","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Action (physics); New class; Class analysis; Privilege (computing)","score_opus":0.08277399389543627,"score_gpt":0.27810242312333466,"score_spread":0.1953284292278984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128204741","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02078543,0.11997409,0.010018568,0.6542136,0.040681306,0.00054223614,0.0010191633,0.00023346975,0.1525321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42542085,0.05569486,0.014006944,0.4032031,0.012106727,0.0005365274,0.0008030937,0.00037103365,0.0878569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88389426,0.021037223,0.0073416526,0.007830674,0.07048914,0.009407111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65593356,0.13768335,0.0101217255,0.012255394,0.17971644,0.0042894967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10403974,0.0006386726,0.0012427965,0.009945016,0.015764158,0.015162366,0.008861077,0.011621876,0.0034903598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21102928,0.0007483377,0.0011795308,0.008918125,0.024388619,0.007240985,0.00507396,0.016380092,0.00069455564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000413821,0.000023779294,0.0023150868,0.0008785406,0.000060853916,0.0003277108,0.015383735,0.00017961557,0.00035244998,0.50935245,0.39543948,0.07564497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020559557,0.000015661408,0.004386154,0.002195676,0.000073395466,0.00007115931,0.007163041,0.00028999473,0.0006687799,0.012925595,0.9721004,0.00008956431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8860215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9047394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113978505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.110438034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21077402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8012878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128204937","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i1.071","title":"L’autorisation de L’action Collective : Raisons D’être, Application et Changements À Venir","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legislator; Authorization; Rationalism","score_opus":0.072776719648165,"score_gpt":0.322592384926124,"score_spread":0.249815665277959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128204937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11738867,0.007492715,0.023551213,0.10069976,0.002071576,0.00031857067,0.000079051795,0.00013803651,0.7482605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86004806,0.001124599,0.0042108227,0.007645122,0.00026950712,0.00011783161,0.000023658042,0.000043434815,0.12651686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768038,0.008821462,0.0007988311,0.002279472,0.008208795,0.0030876629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820885,0.007990427,0.0012025198,0.0015124172,0.0058648484,0.0013414093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017121037,0.00039689345,0.00040066015,0.0012175743,0.018618569,0.011609563,0.0019631474,0.0065709413,0.009663241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015882136,0.0003405212,0.00061043986,0.0009282969,0.029456308,0.0029552225,0.0046072123,0.008199783,0.0008817217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034812703,0.000046577796,0.0024550557,0.00013739835,0.000020059051,0.0005861566,0.026444526,0.00050363445,0.0010301728,0.9188668,0.018242642,0.03163219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057629994,0.00017137034,0.016482277,0.0010918125,0.00006771526,0.0007689879,0.042143192,0.0017936016,0.004359938,0.10745774,0.8253685,0.00023729895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47462583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61595434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5253742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034047253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048842933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9437264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128205584","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v9i1_75","title":"“An Unassailable Right to Speak”: Class Communications, Opt-Out Rights, and the Class Proceedings Act","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Class (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Jurisprudence; Opposition (politics); Economic Justice; Class action; Civil procedure","score_opus":0.029671644467252095,"score_gpt":0.27190659672714557,"score_spread":0.24223495225989347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128205584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053865016,0.0044675237,0.005265832,0.25308937,0.0007133369,0.000117206,0.0002895901,0.0000697765,0.68212235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81783277,0.001380629,0.001880877,0.07214752,0.000929065,0.00023220977,0.00011626517,0.00005561449,0.10542506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98355204,0.003697637,0.0005867405,0.0016201151,0.005570686,0.00497278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98809195,0.007239307,0.0009117832,0.00085398887,0.001778588,0.0011243557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00887979,0.0004738672,0.00039716958,0.0008582016,0.016268536,0.012938594,0.0029620416,0.020999385,0.0062175496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017192816,0.0006722228,0.0006529108,0.0008093667,0.043381665,0.0061975583,0.0041973144,0.01416468,0.00095229293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014914559,0.000014102814,0.000586965,0.00001745219,0.0000031830425,0.0002348381,0.005253566,0.00006204179,0.00013817076,0.97019124,0.020433791,0.0030498544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013524231,0.00009609993,0.01039896,0.0006226213,0.000075064505,0.0005466546,0.012311701,0.0011977276,0.001399002,0.3815042,0.5914598,0.00025298842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.575778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67298055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.424222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02473811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040209934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85344064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128205875","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i2.617","title":"Ethical Conduct for Class Counsel in Ontario","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.13612397194215167,"score_gpt":0.3965539763992294,"score_spread":0.26043000445707776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128205875","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16608532,0.021527741,0.0024722482,0.5908841,0.0049886205,0.0044506574,0.0011537346,0.00013485181,0.20830272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6954526,0.0094865635,0.0062654475,0.10272503,0.00085367705,0.0030158055,0.00040361425,0.0001406531,0.18165663],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9403077,0.01848338,0.0031346378,0.0024831446,0.021829845,0.013761255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80134946,0.068987705,0.010645692,0.005925584,0.0784516,0.03463997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055008262,0.00042015465,0.0008715198,0.0033974922,0.05907119,0.011644276,0.0050074947,0.0121583445,0.0072495327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10813318,0.0014193625,0.0005965809,0.005071987,0.011139921,0.001971536,0.0051847915,0.010620576,0.0005621926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033099984,0.00023803006,0.029735023,0.001145129,0.00010851613,0.0020263249,0.16144714,0.00067273615,0.0014815185,0.11479922,0.6006357,0.08737965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001518938,0.00008318442,0.06187599,0.0016847637,0.0000992193,0.00037013524,0.095890954,0.00042233302,0.0008416719,0.0053390847,0.83309567,0.00014508964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20465048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20465048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.691687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92249274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128207786","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v4i1.203","title":"<i>The Modern Cy-Près Doctrine: Applications and Implications</i> By Rachael P. Mulheron (2006)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.023629368592420534,"score_gpt":0.33034769485260596,"score_spread":0.3067183262601854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128207786","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015482665,0.27621084,0.0048409547,0.49758917,0.01831707,0.000045695055,0.00027792665,0.000060155366,0.20110995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14601795,0.3072253,0.009462919,0.24654467,0.040182345,0.0003081394,0.00040911202,0.00022677003,0.24962282],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988325,0.00039714726,0.000044269516,0.00015692541,0.00046267844,0.00010635374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981054,0.0011000313,0.00014182161,0.00007295862,0.00050322624,0.00007663167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016894154,0.0007296525,0.00038488803,0.0021382398,0.0041742167,0.0048388336,0.0011428631,0.003883388,0.0072014616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004457029,0.0002748375,0.00045997844,0.004083603,0.006753013,0.0053893835,0.0016549402,0.007551639,0.0017353848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009208857,0.000009002229,0.00017810675,0.00015293641,0.0000064734963,0.00003271799,0.00051892287,0.00010739352,0.000054427557,0.42680165,0.55678123,0.015347991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057234756,0.0000068532854,0.0009770776,0.00045702065,0.000009090045,0.00007243495,0.0006187606,0.0002029943,0.00015972808,0.1315826,0.86589193,0.000015740694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.075179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11440391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.924821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005774388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068225907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14948285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128208207","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v12i1.39","title":"Secondary Market Liability in Ontario: Interpreting the Leave Test Before and After <i>Theratechnologies</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Test (biology); Liability; Economic Justice; Legislative intent; Secondary market","score_opus":0.026534694326912644,"score_gpt":0.31059514158139895,"score_spread":0.2840604472544863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128208207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10898341,0.01683854,0.008053311,0.14216785,0.00250459,0.00038285903,0.00067983806,0.00013817796,0.7202514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8277947,0.0088530425,0.0055189645,0.03634779,0.0008487114,0.00016021343,0.00021615172,0.00008852366,0.12017189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98417056,0.001605822,0.0007344456,0.0010242974,0.00904766,0.003417208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860065,0.0055693057,0.0012967094,0.00063339877,0.0055232407,0.00097078783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0101202745,0.00042356184,0.00052894425,0.0025051737,0.014312523,0.0073046307,0.0026591064,0.0064422362,0.003447347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024305843,0.00049687945,0.00071751536,0.0020967338,0.016967261,0.0025429379,0.003391986,0.004851357,0.00041209863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003631481,0.0000225686,0.011966838,0.00026932536,0.000018269186,0.0018707155,0.022680119,0.00046776584,0.001214429,0.8503716,0.07561569,0.035466366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036552527,0.00006302864,0.0430428,0.0012859515,0.000106156374,0.0006998458,0.016249498,0.0012531269,0.0017850214,0.06844706,0.866863,0.00016790829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9677048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98651904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098602556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.098602556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16763802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.715415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128209445","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i2.255","title":"“Cost-Shifting” and Access to Justice: A Quantitative Review of Certification Motion Cost Awards in Ontario","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Certification; Context (archaeology); Commission; Class (philosophy); Class action","score_opus":0.19675123671813405,"score_gpt":0.38315626247236273,"score_spread":0.18640502575422868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128209445","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29422683,0.4990808,0.0036841796,0.025848396,0.0010651336,0.002690357,0.027789408,0.00007503773,0.14553982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8194809,0.15724872,0.003757813,0.0029501042,0.000327012,0.0009178489,0.00494747,0.00005930185,0.010310863],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9465696,0.008039983,0.0051826783,0.0016333424,0.036553632,0.002020872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6878554,0.0856578,0.044789214,0.0044586817,0.17382717,0.003411752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036121212,0.00033960905,0.0012168625,0.032008935,0.004218339,0.0067576556,0.0021223298,0.00090782216,0.002899166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11305387,0.0006357678,0.0008631476,0.06454549,0.003484661,0.0016132254,0.0021268295,0.00096907595,0.0001966173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005271584,0.00017793979,0.29637253,0.08111133,0.0021190075,0.0008150987,0.04958902,0.0020338628,0.0023212782,0.044735983,0.11367211,0.40652463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004115347,0.00014127558,0.583289,0.021017589,0.0013723196,0.00015526805,0.0131315,0.00059787487,0.0007029969,0.00097582646,0.37842456,0.00015061312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93738526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98035496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111868806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.111868806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20676461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8116688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128209449","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v5i2.294","title":"Three’s a Crowd: Third-Party Litigation Funding of Class Actions in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Legislation","score_opus":0.06011244629898201,"score_gpt":0.2758319854926089,"score_spread":0.21571953919362688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128209449","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121949665,0.17086782,0.0022452474,0.34904158,0.008019723,0.0010502114,0.0063341106,0.00035041466,0.34014124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73597044,0.08443714,0.002444648,0.07497435,0.0019172988,0.0005075019,0.0022641642,0.0002339616,0.09725056],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9646257,0.0025501964,0.0012858534,0.0013493007,0.022263784,0.007925128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91220677,0.020646092,0.0033145265,0.0016587187,0.052646726,0.009527165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022246039,0.00067874265,0.0015177787,0.01209994,0.022442885,0.017439576,0.0056665675,0.008887087,0.006737716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06421822,0.00094780774,0.0012061243,0.014343238,0.0054158596,0.0031977026,0.0033364962,0.007931215,0.00047156776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003739398,0.00015463209,0.012955024,0.0017837168,0.0002407865,0.0005065636,0.007956602,0.0019479041,0.00051385694,0.16319185,0.6777304,0.13264465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023711252,0.0000973701,0.0760753,0.002545245,0.000585795,0.00013876536,0.0102714775,0.001508207,0.000867856,0.0068972795,0.90048176,0.00029371557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99618185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99803716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20372392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20372392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5397923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9235674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128209984","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i2.239","title":"Mass Actions: How Litigation Investment Makes Class Actions Unnecessary","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Action (physics); Investment (military); Class (philosophy); Mass tort","score_opus":0.14048935723711184,"score_gpt":0.27971500276922506,"score_spread":0.13922564553211322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128209984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026773814,0.015572766,0.043846723,0.094719306,0.001215759,0.00026232784,0.00015098149,0.00022601416,0.8172323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82703626,0.010999326,0.0165506,0.041083276,0.0012285481,0.00036987537,0.00010495844,0.00023220517,0.10239498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96518165,0.0091844555,0.0009882496,0.0033715304,0.015753519,0.005520657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9590091,0.024966126,0.0027750756,0.003565739,0.00853105,0.001153004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028672164,0.00060442503,0.0007967401,0.0031106048,0.010491091,0.01404967,0.0036064854,0.00805443,0.014601544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047093555,0.00065609417,0.0009777583,0.0017749167,0.021559909,0.009171287,0.005251615,0.008503468,0.0016419666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009742375,0.000011179727,0.0003306846,0.000062393934,0.000010152683,0.00008296069,0.0010252894,0.00017034219,0.000098287965,0.9704826,0.011428727,0.016287588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009064538,0.00007161304,0.0027092544,0.0008668609,0.00013271594,0.00026327246,0.00259426,0.0013727286,0.0010797249,0.43638837,0.5543505,0.00008001494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2145316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.247233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7854684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024902401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03417447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42656577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128211567","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i1.015","title":"Case Review of Decertification Motions in Class Proceedings","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Test (biology); Calculus (dental); New class; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.06788700706739034,"score_gpt":0.29958724747809895,"score_spread":0.2317002404107086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128211567","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01951958,0.8201885,0.0036492576,0.024667127,0.0033251755,0.0009377522,0.0017735204,0.00010505285,0.12583406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28672335,0.6645278,0.0048020384,0.023650711,0.0013085075,0.0005064756,0.001875579,0.00008980963,0.016515741],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.976775,0.0042912383,0.0032761334,0.0014615122,0.012595569,0.0016005026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9253437,0.034893956,0.008163929,0.0028088244,0.027749859,0.0010397945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021798268,0.0004930344,0.0008559908,0.0100258915,0.004196846,0.0031695806,0.0034257665,0.0051162676,0.0047910935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08068758,0.00055224757,0.0011328863,0.010144015,0.0036324456,0.0014077378,0.0015867392,0.0035203074,0.0010760418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028647474,0.00015583295,0.0108125005,0.024261601,0.0004919692,0.014780328,0.0050748093,0.0008171162,0.0014528283,0.05881663,0.36231875,0.5207311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035509267,0.00007417456,0.009379173,0.022180066,0.00053943717,0.0074546267,0.0014357115,0.00016361185,0.0017482267,0.0014065319,0.9554918,0.00009114704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34683654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47604913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65316343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021649979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044545714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68963546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128212273","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v10i1-2.7","title":"Beyond the Courtroom: Access to Justice, Privatization, and the Future of Class Action Research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Expansive; Economic Justice; Scholarship; Politics; Class (philosophy); Class action; Public policy","score_opus":0.13576560226060283,"score_gpt":0.3786543577581115,"score_spread":0.24288875549750868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128212273","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029821841,0.5463898,0.0052196924,0.1799204,0.0020343643,0.000072817886,0.000087762965,0.00004273698,0.23641065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7572743,0.20787863,0.001932959,0.015849609,0.001320165,0.00008748084,0.000062482184,0.00003167965,0.01556276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809971,0.008972355,0.00058490806,0.0013114244,0.005367088,0.0027671056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9720043,0.02004252,0.0017910751,0.0016833852,0.0032266777,0.0012521094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01774371,0.00040090884,0.00093838415,0.004482197,0.010623017,0.015452712,0.0025514318,0.0047168084,0.005837301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028197208,0.00023149012,0.00051627547,0.006641739,0.044109054,0.010239581,0.004663157,0.0051805037,0.00028530296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015852427,0.000027751337,0.00068500516,0.0006469357,0.000014219351,0.000057578764,0.011131851,0.0002898719,0.00008156322,0.8818164,0.0058532036,0.09937978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029693396,0.00006901486,0.012267661,0.008798257,0.00006996837,0.00011927723,0.034190305,0.0005008721,0.00043438858,0.27712741,0.6663199,0.00007333209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53303885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56561655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46696115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046421878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09191821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93942237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128213404","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v4i2.220","title":"Seeking Recognition of Canadian Class Action Judgments in Foreign Jurisdictions: Perils and Pitfalls","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Class action; Foreign policy; Control (management); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.09427068207777062,"score_gpt":0.26925571247865815,"score_spread":0.17498503040088753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128213404","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052803043,0.076811336,0.0036279445,0.6460533,0.0080186445,0.0009120425,0.0017755944,0.00029729542,0.20970085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6809304,0.03352641,0.012623164,0.2002605,0.0034090374,0.0008842387,0.0014707457,0.0003086183,0.06658691],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8796416,0.0217125,0.0073465966,0.006158484,0.06531073,0.01983004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5295426,0.12164364,0.009880234,0.008227317,0.31726122,0.013444871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14468339,0.0008319487,0.001977251,0.01933752,0.03184584,0.024173915,0.010063279,0.012201309,0.0047429665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27108943,0.0012395326,0.0013744242,0.018034536,0.011212305,0.006677266,0.005474763,0.012446177,0.00073327444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017089031,0.00009012692,0.014285325,0.002253459,0.00018422505,0.00034892323,0.020817801,0.00051652885,0.000752469,0.14494553,0.6369576,0.17867716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014172672,0.0000659049,0.05643619,0.004108411,0.00034342136,0.00018232258,0.024345007,0.0010556154,0.001585156,0.012309463,0.8990033,0.00042345852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97878075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99262446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16386108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16386108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41193992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9698026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128214096","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i2.659","title":"Canadian Class Action Review—Cumulative Index","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.04032764317773567,"score_gpt":0.2846501868435062,"score_spread":0.2443225436657705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128214096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012417631,0.31748262,0.0008015949,0.06016046,0.0643256,0.002143946,0.09038748,0.001433469,0.4620231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022794718,0.3451772,0.002059096,0.01569009,0.023515658,0.0022926463,0.06819837,0.0004430906,0.5198291],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871748,0.0004165898,0.00065107126,0.00049985276,0.009919802,0.0013378501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9335076,0.0018537192,0.00216687,0.0010873141,0.05684926,0.004535155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00530516,0.0021258541,0.0030666033,0.045803785,0.004717856,0.008103832,0.0041523045,0.0048500495,0.088826776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026627747,0.0009602458,0.0012941147,0.050244547,0.0017844584,0.0022535855,0.002030074,0.0029066592,0.03899521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001246999,0.0000068937447,0.00010876948,0.0004409483,0.0000062554022,0.000004769136,0.000004837928,0.000029428418,0.000012285807,0.00031359823,0.985859,0.013200674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001770204,0.0000063049674,0.003254233,0.0006623025,0.000022957194,0.0000093295275,0.000017472124,0.00004408586,0.000018958253,0.00021466287,0.99571854,0.000013458795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8153098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89278793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18469018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04282731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14933828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3715557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128214363","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i2.195","title":"After the Windfall: Representation of Class Members in Individual Issues Adjudication","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Settlement (finance); Class (philosophy); Representation (politics); Class action; Incentive","score_opus":0.09364897409981149,"score_gpt":0.30696438437873436,"score_spread":0.21331541027892287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128214363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09498216,0.031134328,0.064663656,0.3912513,0.007013272,0.002024163,0.0003528148,0.00033527598,0.40824306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7412397,0.008968084,0.029346678,0.089155234,0.0020801402,0.00069221214,0.0002483731,0.00016492126,0.12810464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90367126,0.030993877,0.0042478237,0.0059931255,0.040128272,0.014965629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9301262,0.029669715,0.0035351377,0.0060281307,0.027767733,0.0028730612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08100825,0.0004074968,0.0007351713,0.0033969886,0.016981281,0.012465516,0.004977322,0.008301155,0.004774776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11337052,0.0005994787,0.0007745395,0.0033036405,0.01131727,0.0065861926,0.005731842,0.011205123,0.0013834626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013149073,0.00008184245,0.006475297,0.00048541042,0.000051644773,0.0011827227,0.02660672,0.00054175337,0.0018559867,0.5036397,0.14289483,0.31605262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012700158,0.00018679725,0.016922098,0.0020185392,0.000114923205,0.00071355025,0.015590395,0.0013303593,0.0027331584,0.056573685,0.9035468,0.00014267235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.398432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56163645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.601568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021627262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07442924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7922257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128214659","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v12i2.157","title":"Deterring Compensation: Class Action Litigation and Damage Awards Against Corporate Defendants","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Fiduciary; Plaintiff; Deterrence theory; Duty; Deterrence (psychology); Action (physics); Damages","score_opus":0.1283942777516027,"score_gpt":0.3057690406135191,"score_spread":0.17737476286191642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128214659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46475774,0.0040506995,0.017895512,0.039048623,0.00079403335,0.00035757935,0.00011810065,0.00011583914,0.4728618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98800176,0.00034001752,0.0007356629,0.0018775789,0.0001664302,0.00004083747,0.000012489932,0.000004834034,0.008820423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97728115,0.006365059,0.001292276,0.0018741958,0.009164789,0.0040225857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9500003,0.03256468,0.007853648,0.0017429646,0.0056602154,0.0021781928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018306242,0.00048442313,0.0005646023,0.0036512217,0.007364061,0.010635042,0.0021198774,0.014002613,0.008722171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060644742,0.0004141246,0.0006311863,0.0016787946,0.009430769,0.0043262243,0.0051174737,0.0077883513,0.00060075533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019356064,0.0004847166,0.041418575,0.0001685896,0.00011217056,0.0020046828,0.004013474,0.0028954255,0.0012681246,0.88494897,0.012510464,0.04998121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005656007,0.00177387,0.16086206,0.0015542349,0.00085596077,0.005287776,0.012368614,0.043111406,0.012911295,0.57652223,0.18344009,0.00074682717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03675113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06738246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96324885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014347357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012162589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10409784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128215102","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v2i2_217","title":"Protecting Canadian Plaintiffs in International Class Actions: The Need for A Principled Approach in Light of <i>Currie V. Mcdonald’s Restaurants of Canada Ltd.</i>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class (philosophy); World class; Class action; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.05043083678692827,"score_gpt":0.32353347706725993,"score_spread":0.27310264028033165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128215102","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004669743,0.06157951,0.002823016,0.7903917,0.005754165,0.00018268464,0.0005416346,0.00009244121,0.13396513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15985377,0.0625738,0.013337705,0.697136,0.004073398,0.00029482282,0.0006127121,0.00013720161,0.0619807],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96267277,0.0040723193,0.0015456352,0.0020758738,0.022201704,0.007431792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95696557,0.015584928,0.0015963911,0.00095825165,0.021664778,0.003230068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026460856,0.0012290189,0.0014471917,0.005499097,0.024027646,0.021393133,0.008591596,0.03237391,0.0042117424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056708053,0.0011846151,0.0020448996,0.0065369485,0.017637093,0.0075162523,0.0034536186,0.03001287,0.000679026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021364543,0.000023162434,0.0012191903,0.00062365714,0.000045485293,0.0003048826,0.0037214493,0.00039302438,0.0003137641,0.39907587,0.56740654,0.026851634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051167313,0.000036078236,0.0070556337,0.0024778529,0.00023641772,0.00018726008,0.0050854124,0.0005149105,0.00060598366,0.033658348,0.94988453,0.00020641321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98128307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1123309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1123309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38938457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8150215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128217306","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v10i1-2.203","title":"Institutional Abuse Class Actions Post- <i>Cloud</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Class (philosophy); Class action; Economic Justice; Certification","score_opus":0.08496053618825773,"score_gpt":0.28724768087558383,"score_spread":0.20228714468732611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128217306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039276376,0.07592906,0.0037290805,0.22485894,0.0056727417,0.0007151707,0.0015871234,0.00017262476,0.6480589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5908456,0.058260813,0.004039027,0.14184469,0.0022237168,0.00048017784,0.0014696709,0.00019358505,0.20064278],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9620388,0.0038460288,0.002016434,0.002330954,0.021936744,0.007830932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9420549,0.017359167,0.004579168,0.0029544544,0.029632835,0.0034194863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024609046,0.00046537316,0.00062016636,0.004061071,0.020213587,0.009193907,0.0046391366,0.008389659,0.00695075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047523603,0.0005581912,0.001020147,0.0043928786,0.012283384,0.0033142099,0.0035244199,0.008648817,0.0010140748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003912748,0.00005203906,0.0057739574,0.0007905393,0.000055197273,0.0007960318,0.015752586,0.00023405979,0.00063109054,0.36619383,0.50472355,0.104958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014044563,0.000016743448,0.0085795205,0.0011820591,0.000063050305,0.00016672073,0.0049859183,0.00010357525,0.0005898144,0.0046644886,0.9795869,0.000047222762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9107559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9449569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10521132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10521132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17860019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7633651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128217799","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i1.25","title":"Necessary Analysis — Unexpected Outcomes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Discretion; Reset (finance); Balance (ability); Order (exchange); Investment (military)","score_opus":0.06874231811004827,"score_gpt":0.30332093779180186,"score_spread":0.2345786196817536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128217799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.091318116,0.004755348,0.08429277,0.15917759,0.002923981,0.000929905,0.0025403225,0.00048510608,0.65357685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489849,0.001908162,0.010431607,0.015957065,0.0010539198,0.0007986678,0.0004114543,0.000164635,0.020289583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.971263,0.011218186,0.0014826857,0.0028775714,0.009402323,0.003756165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9159022,0.05517214,0.005056642,0.01070896,0.011420543,0.001739477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029423226,0.00058289914,0.0012338585,0.0031911358,0.0054848637,0.0060066953,0.0028408545,0.004466397,0.033134453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10748213,0.00047051325,0.0014299428,0.0019389358,0.0076081664,0.008981838,0.0048769885,0.008790444,0.0022526113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000480951,0.000052291896,0.0012013072,0.000104787905,0.000031590454,0.00035022013,0.00045530207,0.00044694284,0.00015395555,0.97404355,0.011910517,0.011201547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054685825,0.000050629158,0.0014113786,0.00019507435,0.00004577524,0.0001790195,0.0008312273,0.0019614224,0.0004871764,0.9584145,0.036343303,0.000025821264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006122546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008101681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033134453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0080469735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010766798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15560675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128217804","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i2.271","title":"Just what the Doctor Ordered: A Canadian Approach to Medical Monitoring and Toxic Risk","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Plaintiff; Damages; Liability; Tort; Action (physics); Test (biology); Cause of action","score_opus":0.060902286470945845,"score_gpt":0.2787865895746151,"score_spread":0.21788430310366927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128217804","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063906685,0.511796,0.0017669997,0.32567707,0.0032886679,0.00015524414,0.00033399806,0.000025978537,0.15056543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2544399,0.53113055,0.004391769,0.18382044,0.002191183,0.00015718563,0.00028879073,0.0000508819,0.023529219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779229,0.0052314466,0.0011857814,0.0014511562,0.0123403175,0.0018683769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9647687,0.015603464,0.0020740274,0.000851672,0.014903228,0.0017987853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015219078,0.0004701669,0.0008114359,0.005487796,0.0069904337,0.006497494,0.0029400312,0.005495802,0.0044547534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039942108,0.00047947612,0.0008166443,0.008248513,0.011849892,0.0024523572,0.0017458369,0.006268396,0.00036079105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011838511,0.00008154644,0.0062929024,0.004345431,0.00010102634,0.0006559015,0.008106165,0.0006012941,0.0004466355,0.61012834,0.19169147,0.17743088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006927902,0.00006545884,0.014025827,0.007262835,0.00016820512,0.00034786796,0.0037337106,0.00022841495,0.00027406396,0.019171752,0.9545566,0.000096058444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96855396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9840957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110682935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.110682935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2622107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80306464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128219108","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i1.287","title":"Jurisdictional Issues in International Cartel Cases: A Canadian Perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fraser Health","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Cartel; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Negotiation","score_opus":0.033513948870588735,"score_gpt":0.2727636550170453,"score_spread":0.23924970614645658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128219108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037149053,0.15681195,0.0031813376,0.22435251,0.0016394631,0.00020250316,0.0013581066,0.00008107642,0.57522404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7134164,0.14345637,0.00453089,0.0766134,0.002366622,0.00020464558,0.001112041,0.00014063125,0.058158927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9721343,0.0036424363,0.000943592,0.0016415038,0.012882604,0.0087556215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93352216,0.027915055,0.0038074658,0.0008820591,0.030590318,0.0032828823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021506682,0.0008138686,0.0015399833,0.026123058,0.022764072,0.027159555,0.0066611427,0.01500898,0.008856903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060381323,0.0011843594,0.0014758075,0.03822768,0.016021824,0.006943644,0.003019709,0.009189286,0.0005630672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005460304,0.00006270373,0.0038817648,0.0006216391,0.000078859375,0.00057883485,0.0046812464,0.0021384656,0.00018483319,0.7751383,0.1753606,0.037218176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007618124,0.000044365494,0.03388574,0.0031067866,0.00040485465,0.0004434301,0.01653242,0.0022841233,0.00046249485,0.10857378,0.833819,0.00036690373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98747617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16666356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16666356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23928995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96655214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128219693","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i2.527","title":"The Future of Securities Class Actions in Canada: A Comment on the Article of Philip Anisman and Garry Watson","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Watson; Class (philosophy); Class action","score_opus":0.02201113826381872,"score_gpt":0.22544858841733614,"score_spread":0.2034374501535174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128219693","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013830056,0.020447716,0.00014068326,0.9565291,0.006746553,0.000034831548,0.0006134516,0.00003865279,0.0140659455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026157659,0.01730559,0.00046286703,0.91923904,0.007304982,0.00007292251,0.00029782802,0.0001038162,0.029055346],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9686539,0.0018366056,0.0015243924,0.002198972,0.018102903,0.007683258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91164273,0.027547095,0.0047007604,0.0012503369,0.045363177,0.009495887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017435385,0.0012111594,0.0025942088,0.005263708,0.027763003,0.022676982,0.009623726,0.06470798,0.009744163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061374243,0.0019256484,0.0026223124,0.012054603,0.012388818,0.0061031883,0.003483878,0.04368536,0.0014257297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041866344,0.000012347269,0.00065771735,0.00018121801,0.000031951335,0.00013965249,0.0010053827,0.00013236968,0.000079879355,0.034119878,0.95878476,0.004812959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009466392,0.000018200275,0.0067343535,0.00080576475,0.00013557976,0.000060557406,0.00196484,0.00025141696,0.00027243598,0.005128058,0.98433983,0.00019433725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98962677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14636308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14636308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38096195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9900978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128220682","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v11i1.125","title":"Mi Casa Es Su Casa: <i>Van Breda</i> as the House Rule for Global Securities Class Actions in Ontario","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Jurisdiction; Class action; Misrepresentation; Damages; Shareholder; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.07966346280150141,"score_gpt":0.2932976554087981,"score_spread":0.21363419260729669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128220682","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097236924,0.0045635686,0.0026390546,0.1332811,0.0011926331,0.00012708809,0.001199183,0.00011814253,0.75964236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6438575,0.0020876394,0.0019631465,0.029232346,0.00033307087,0.00007144558,0.00034500216,0.000116865915,0.32199308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639976,0.0002748614,0.000080397775,0.00059048296,0.0016190507,0.0010353423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753225,0.00042066735,0.0003179973,0.00020497564,0.0009951257,0.00052906206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012274886,0.0002465728,0.00022908521,0.000589538,0.014108049,0.0071379784,0.0012107781,0.0028552753,0.010069523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004727185,0.00033572392,0.00035372243,0.001264996,0.008682554,0.0021401073,0.0024830739,0.00325688,0.0008360553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005737729,0.000022222366,0.01562827,0.00012878877,0.000020313777,0.0008638211,0.029103057,0.0002108315,0.0009916123,0.68532676,0.24535501,0.022291938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012535547,0.000012411761,0.018157536,0.00012007798,0.00002766045,0.00014735376,0.010278295,0.00022905736,0.0004937901,0.010992233,0.959475,0.00005407546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97679865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06880116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06880116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0805966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49918967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128220956","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v12i1.97","title":"Successful Tobacco Litigation in Quebec: Why Hold Cigarettes to a Higher Standard than Pharmaceutical Products?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Causation; Class action; Damages; Duty to warn; Test (biology); Duty of care; Cause of action; Interpretation (philosophy); Product (mathematics)","score_opus":0.06014535350663752,"score_gpt":0.3221187374384276,"score_spread":0.2619733839317901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128220956","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10413196,0.013096955,0.0023670306,0.6112556,0.0024349021,0.00027026475,0.0006342466,0.00012359304,0.26568538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7289502,0.0057841,0.0016977409,0.16752619,0.0006733214,0.00011210504,0.0002929181,0.000073957824,0.09488952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872479,0.0015879503,0.00037882497,0.001105443,0.005728884,0.003950972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858618,0.003527711,0.00078266696,0.00045647725,0.0067154025,0.002655955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008703568,0.000484813,0.0004505846,0.0019612126,0.027568238,0.012541696,0.004062803,0.01401375,0.014184176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01980093,0.0006527145,0.0009525279,0.0021356582,0.009777405,0.004196541,0.0037161277,0.010792455,0.0011631105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011236446,0.00025433244,0.05413271,0.00043465217,0.00016900439,0.0063104974,0.016731555,0.0017161114,0.0017499387,0.44061565,0.4014088,0.076364376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000359953,0.00018949893,0.10911817,0.0014907065,0.0003265697,0.0015484205,0.035559457,0.0046196734,0.0014770427,0.03730185,0.80752474,0.00048404923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14734264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14734264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20565258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9889617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128220993","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v11i2.373","title":"Common Law Securities Misrepresentation Claims — Still with us in the Post- <i>Green</i> Era?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Common law; Damages; Supreme court; Statutory law; Class action; Certification; English law","score_opus":0.03935244128611594,"score_gpt":0.33256707909535366,"score_spread":0.29321463780923773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128220993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01275035,0.042566847,0.0013741615,0.85258937,0.003954052,0.000045141664,0.00017687856,0.000033424352,0.086509846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3677046,0.040061716,0.0031049708,0.5246432,0.005359176,0.00006883779,0.00016943958,0.000068564834,0.058819585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849081,0.0023437918,0.0005495065,0.00179408,0.0071911043,0.0032134717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721149,0.013798306,0.0019913928,0.0012535925,0.009392051,0.0014498156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019725395,0.0004189722,0.0008059796,0.0022748671,0.011010419,0.012926269,0.0040839543,0.015702626,0.0034810482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038099088,0.00039801782,0.0010302837,0.0028169882,0.026473012,0.009184446,0.002662547,0.017065061,0.0006512388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024270075,0.000020545716,0.0014547207,0.00022935415,0.000025602842,0.00048827147,0.00794067,0.000079459154,0.00034514198,0.81481844,0.13903505,0.03553845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028539935,0.000030639505,0.006289829,0.001348052,0.00007963814,0.00027359082,0.01052737,0.00020252219,0.00075615663,0.12796322,0.8523939,0.00010647903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7575912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8783512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7575912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046463493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09093423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4876728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128221300","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i1.57","title":"The use of Matrix Settlements in Canadian Class Actions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Settlement (finance); Human settlement; Class (philosophy); Compensation (psychology); Matrix (chemical analysis)","score_opus":0.1533918435098147,"score_gpt":0.3068803366885022,"score_spread":0.15348849317868749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128221300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06886743,0.00692335,0.23654705,0.03034105,0.000948964,0.0010117365,0.0014062902,0.0004593437,0.65349483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88498217,0.0031310937,0.06907308,0.0018998632,0.00014392979,0.0002694281,0.0002679445,0.00010663413,0.04012589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97103226,0.0059567536,0.0010853994,0.0025743388,0.0160517,0.0032995087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98111033,0.0072463052,0.0015674965,0.0013971822,0.008179541,0.0004991406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02049424,0.0006037787,0.0006907916,0.007749367,0.010962978,0.010426929,0.003777607,0.002801091,0.0075419284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045848604,0.00084305595,0.0014201225,0.0059007024,0.010488909,0.0049024993,0.004451766,0.002996623,0.0007062427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014337194,0.000008376692,0.0014848453,0.00005794499,0.000009162092,0.00008475446,0.0016088042,0.0059067574,0.00012175347,0.95199555,0.007190474,0.031517062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010473967,0.00009572812,0.018438552,0.00080847944,0.00013753072,0.00041465618,0.00615414,0.06848281,0.0020858864,0.36983684,0.53307164,0.00036896535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9136996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93346995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08630037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.082928106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08261262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6016883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128222538","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i2.177","title":"Reconciling Limitation Period Principles with the Purposes and Complexity of Ontario Class Proceedings","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Period (music); Adjudication; Class action; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.09973335154260525,"score_gpt":0.2452948473913408,"score_spread":0.14556149584873557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128222538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06745932,0.042826984,0.023615751,0.2553636,0.0017879079,0.00045329178,0.00038571696,0.00010036277,0.608007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9149313,0.014139899,0.012200401,0.01974954,0.000837286,0.00033138713,0.00014645244,0.000054596414,0.03760906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9296625,0.016274171,0.0051984084,0.0037110518,0.038631428,0.0065224417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92894673,0.0341772,0.0076274145,0.003051657,0.023999937,0.0021970975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041547865,0.00028376025,0.00060886116,0.0061062207,0.016078295,0.018519381,0.0048992205,0.0057992595,0.0029834998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064863905,0.0007084261,0.00069874694,0.005845589,0.026137043,0.007747028,0.005339028,0.006839151,0.00026980232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010489448,0.0000103408765,0.0017616766,0.00035509327,0.000013344405,0.00014587725,0.011283169,0.00043106638,0.00018611512,0.9496173,0.012740093,0.023445478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041734926,0.000047318128,0.026542861,0.0025376445,0.0000899211,0.00018136279,0.018957652,0.0010501966,0.0005662139,0.18295,0.76688904,0.00014602013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8250593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9197952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1749407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11195637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1726382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81230414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128222581","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v11i2.309","title":"When Numbers Tell A Story: A Quantitative Look at Certification Decisions in Ontario","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Class (philosophy); Class action; Action (physics); Scholarship","score_opus":0.09596527810799173,"score_gpt":0.2893506605083816,"score_spread":0.19338538240038988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128222581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93237334,0.0017149695,0.00067987834,0.008786306,0.000046780166,0.00016205593,0.009468604,0.000020110823,0.046748016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98396814,0.0012180331,0.00041430054,0.00040073958,0.000025820238,0.000054718348,0.0027285137,0.000019561512,0.011170152],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921514,0.0009904174,0.0004232381,0.00052759395,0.0046109934,0.001296424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96257687,0.010061066,0.010365575,0.001003739,0.013751112,0.0022416902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054625534,0.00016462109,0.0003583941,0.006107395,0.0057725706,0.004886484,0.001436382,0.000782259,0.004074073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03205567,0.0002981639,0.00026759275,0.01572707,0.0036562819,0.0020647498,0.0023920336,0.000965871,0.00031276845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016546751,0.00006019746,0.75024575,0.00039700823,0.000097165685,0.0010353117,0.14484027,0.0012549071,0.0008599529,0.019019743,0.03796853,0.044055693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062612007,0.000020543963,0.8577058,0.00016451253,0.00002252948,0.000079454876,0.078242704,0.0007688988,0.0002769706,0.00090626284,0.061749917,0.00005621088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99522334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094836116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.094836116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059327524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6880874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128224353","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v11i1.29","title":"Canadian Privacy Class Actions at the Crossroads","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Harm; Class (philosophy); Statutory law; Damages; Information privacy; Jurisprudence; Privacy law","score_opus":0.10234758789860363,"score_gpt":0.3087010563084919,"score_spread":0.20635346840988825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128224353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014283427,0.21303716,0.0030692862,0.24949266,0.0037013958,0.00018375367,0.0017447877,0.00017520775,0.5143123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4933118,0.22484164,0.0076244823,0.107843995,0.0019594824,0.00018054576,0.0017179848,0.00026871494,0.16225143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9684513,0.0022484087,0.0008073301,0.0020290867,0.021753853,0.0047100023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95869565,0.0070716813,0.0012109416,0.001118776,0.029611494,0.0022914966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013005847,0.00069808966,0.0008440201,0.007273168,0.022481497,0.014774416,0.004217094,0.0061140824,0.0136915585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033375032,0.0006558304,0.0011501482,0.010556708,0.011879791,0.004298759,0.0037943458,0.00766351,0.0010488254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002886366,0.000025775986,0.0018399399,0.0008110391,0.00003187919,0.00031357884,0.0044396077,0.00046696275,0.00024761623,0.59135395,0.28549132,0.11494952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007321346,0.000009170833,0.004398721,0.0010522136,0.00003936178,0.000097382144,0.0020700218,0.00013394988,0.00024742403,0.010121005,0.98177767,0.000045707257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99266464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20976613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20976613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4387867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9165593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128224900","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i2.379","title":"Book Review: <i>The Class Actions Controversy: The Origins and Development of the Ontario Class Proceedings Act</i> By Suzanne Chiodo","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); World class; Working class; New class","score_opus":0.023819745698018615,"score_gpt":0.24633879383742235,"score_spread":0.22251904813940374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128224900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004149171,0.21513546,0.00025932404,0.55536854,0.08192369,0.00014476472,0.0014174299,0.00011037607,0.1452255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013090795,0.18923129,0.000593374,0.23462495,0.05164843,0.0002654777,0.0013776217,0.00022995577,0.50893813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922328,0.00041118622,0.00024883612,0.00039066674,0.006043473,0.0006730652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691929,0.0065309363,0.0013769084,0.00054626825,0.020476324,0.0018766901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038207048,0.0009048376,0.0011951546,0.0058709243,0.007918731,0.010038419,0.0036247682,0.010775974,0.028570794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024579186,0.00087902095,0.00066056894,0.01042032,0.0070797224,0.0030152146,0.001519823,0.007902811,0.009081286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001273273,9.075406e-7,0.000025330402,0.000044933804,0.0000010021292,0.0000036301933,0.000027008675,0.000006667492,0.0000046775185,0.0013127469,0.9963689,0.0022029611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040133214,0.0000016733428,0.0005790664,0.00029404936,0.000005879604,0.0000092270975,0.000100684156,0.000011442248,0.000009628818,0.00045885224,0.9985159,0.000009590711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8943878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9717221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10561222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068275996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.121413946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49537933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128225383","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v11i2.321","title":"Developing A Consistent Approach to Balance Distributions in Quebec","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Damages; Distribution (mathematics); Order (exchange); Human settlement; Balance (ability); Settlement (finance); Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.05719553213310316,"score_gpt":0.27342575170274563,"score_spread":0.21623021956964247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128225383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11342872,0.10088985,0.07023019,0.16180186,0.0019072263,0.0038531749,0.0061870795,0.0004639422,0.541238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7656829,0.029629197,0.06493351,0.021783484,0.00027854307,0.0012098564,0.0016951197,0.00012518377,0.11466221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98273176,0.004740506,0.0012805135,0.0014262849,0.0076811286,0.0021398752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.955529,0.0077176644,0.001448692,0.0009765536,0.033482764,0.00084539346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019824509,0.0004796126,0.0005703861,0.00985563,0.009032816,0.0074723936,0.0029863974,0.0024719045,0.0057991166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02826209,0.00052610337,0.00054462295,0.00898157,0.0032401232,0.0028882446,0.00177479,0.002685526,0.00044367524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006321539,0.00012207731,0.01889391,0.0012794832,0.00007554305,0.00085532584,0.009274209,0.007039853,0.0021520634,0.4892941,0.1378591,0.33309108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073555064,0.00009845571,0.047518164,0.0026740741,0.00008642308,0.0002640018,0.010098286,0.0047394074,0.0018979494,0.018864926,0.91350484,0.0001799529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98538536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99321365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15456201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15456201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19575949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98058826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128226642","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i2.395","title":"Our Aging <i>CPA</i> : It’s Time for Ontario to “Opt-In” to a Modern Global Class-Actions Framework","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; CLARITY; Legislature; Enforcement; European union; Settlement (finance); Class (philosophy); Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.07128358913533174,"score_gpt":0.33445849614376033,"score_spread":0.2631749070084286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128226642","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008814468,0.022357617,0.002054961,0.78776896,0.0057704523,0.0001630725,0.000644186,0.000117312746,0.17230901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3177966,0.029551316,0.008981027,0.24166965,0.0030545762,0.00021205419,0.0007163381,0.00026532507,0.39775318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99157315,0.00090128166,0.00027795884,0.00074072176,0.004607728,0.0018991043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98106754,0.002837493,0.0005847244,0.0005952311,0.011484917,0.0034300417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008431826,0.00033962753,0.0003934216,0.00168278,0.016448352,0.016434234,0.0023425617,0.0072690337,0.010646698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013194897,0.00039101666,0.00044163797,0.0019078727,0.011931717,0.0038425003,0.0019488132,0.006409524,0.0012943039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022307611,0.000016699885,0.0016950525,0.00019654477,0.000008905009,0.00017309687,0.003007161,0.00018506618,0.0003766999,0.25500426,0.7142536,0.025060557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050591643,0.000007667524,0.0022932591,0.00025292026,0.000012236857,0.000036427547,0.001735323,0.00016163247,0.00023175315,0.005286434,0.98994774,0.000029510225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.980652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15125003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15125003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27374747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98442966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128226701","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v9i1_5","title":"Class Actions in Canada: Conflicting Purposes and Unpredictable Outcomes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Certification; Action (physics); Control (management); New class; Term (time)","score_opus":0.042399503419157554,"score_gpt":0.26369437362000064,"score_spread":0.2212948702008431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128226701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11880079,0.2303563,0.004377643,0.24090004,0.003376732,0.00090402586,0.0056252233,0.00019654816,0.39546266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82437336,0.09167992,0.00393033,0.04152107,0.00089869596,0.00023893394,0.0015728052,0.00011408096,0.035670854],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92587,0.006812381,0.0032367061,0.0030836337,0.051226385,0.009770921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8352996,0.041114546,0.009844134,0.0025385607,0.103948735,0.0072544194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036152724,0.00052894704,0.0009150107,0.012315434,0.016678141,0.017069247,0.0037453547,0.005287427,0.003759044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.088825345,0.00073243637,0.00083554204,0.014733936,0.009328565,0.0025485961,0.0039814436,0.0055698855,0.00037321312],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016458343,0.000089810404,0.03345796,0.0025584155,0.00029694347,0.0012703773,0.0125007145,0.0028613764,0.0007659584,0.34834486,0.3792086,0.21848047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087612185,0.00007197612,0.09714385,0.0048518507,0.0004963043,0.0003511374,0.013071825,0.0017020063,0.0012866219,0.020824471,0.85975254,0.00035977428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9929929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99722975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22034386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22034386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4336358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9042906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128226719","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v11i1.93","title":"Upsetting the Apple Cart: Certifying Class Actions for Food Labelling Reform","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Transparency (behavior); Class (philosophy); Certification; Legislature; Class action; Tying; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.19254362046782583,"score_gpt":0.3175176917761782,"score_spread":0.12497407130835239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128226719","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01688527,0.4131973,0.0043047727,0.22431663,0.0054830234,0.0002491507,0.00022579326,0.00012600057,0.335212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5849002,0.23952265,0.0064713126,0.104965694,0.0031649466,0.00018464039,0.00025035843,0.00010344526,0.06043685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9759093,0.00496765,0.00080171466,0.0010299543,0.01380072,0.0034907027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686763,0.013350226,0.0016578876,0.0013958471,0.013803022,0.0011168012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022183644,0.0003827147,0.00058759225,0.0042097354,0.007442026,0.010156874,0.0033043365,0.008512248,0.0036059322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04018183,0.00031148293,0.0007294793,0.0037936661,0.01284831,0.0035002802,0.0019060532,0.006072115,0.00052297424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025240697,0.000025531479,0.0006216302,0.0011191336,0.000025531795,0.0001635353,0.0030629276,0.00066133525,0.00033391055,0.7741692,0.12702544,0.09276649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029512245,0.000027096581,0.0030112297,0.0024147616,0.000081585225,0.00006637938,0.0017154983,0.00038246848,0.0005474425,0.024477337,0.9671934,0.000053110645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85308677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87749803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14691323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07566422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16347042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5489849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128226855","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i1.3","title":"Litigating Conspiracy: An Introduction","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.053063102492727776,"score_gpt":0.35949393211381153,"score_spread":0.30643082962108376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128226855","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019950045,0.8206827,0.004420865,0.09652516,0.008486037,0.00036563954,0.0006764403,0.000067442386,0.0667808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044254314,0.83424956,0.009158048,0.061918147,0.01132833,0.0007681073,0.00043666732,0.00008650846,0.037800245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954692,0.001146975,0.00032675118,0.00041780114,0.0016323182,0.0010069689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989599,0.0048915376,0.00043414824,0.00018984583,0.0042161783,0.00066928356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006073459,0.0020851942,0.0018062735,0.019932063,0.009580623,0.01314078,0.0030076555,0.012118074,0.009729395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010363417,0.0012116601,0.0016153305,0.017923791,0.012287422,0.008655725,0.0032412582,0.008185099,0.0012461649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033587723,0.00015869146,0.0014955571,0.003766391,0.000040207942,0.00036929292,0.0038126998,0.001237077,0.00040760683,0.4763356,0.3772656,0.13507764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014279621,0.00004624206,0.0037332966,0.005330666,0.000038199305,0.0001703385,0.0031733627,0.00041517444,0.00012334475,0.035713356,0.9511486,0.00009302091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.778603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86647975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22139698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06958483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.077334896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50487566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128226945","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v9i1_101","title":"Who Takes the Reins? Carriage in Canada Over the Last Decade","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carriage; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Class action; Duration (music)","score_opus":0.023287705247432698,"score_gpt":0.23269369636388232,"score_spread":0.2094059911164496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128226945","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052905887,0.59401995,0.00083534524,0.14412059,0.0043201176,0.00022743153,0.0024482135,0.00010972664,0.20101278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4210461,0.39639992,0.0020901742,0.050733753,0.0010400284,0.00007207739,0.001888942,0.00012182998,0.12660712],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990908,0.0005021895,0.00046289235,0.0006562174,0.005590144,0.0018804899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97911924,0.0020891968,0.0013080743,0.00026143127,0.015101212,0.002120821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007974301,0.00047508744,0.00069854385,0.004464362,0.009174957,0.008525442,0.0026161724,0.0032742866,0.005392472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014928044,0.0004970936,0.00050006434,0.008729368,0.004953386,0.0015341296,0.001596207,0.0031462244,0.00050857296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118933436,0.00007386943,0.014789285,0.003211171,0.000090845184,0.0011576886,0.01038832,0.0010894816,0.0009749171,0.15203062,0.50415534,0.3119195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007728347,0.000017681154,0.019937288,0.0012431445,0.00004447522,0.00014108096,0.002615152,0.00012386528,0.00025724145,0.0007754038,0.97478867,0.00004825663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17015673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17015673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3465159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9625006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128227495","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v12i1.3","title":"Class Actions as A Bridge Between Cultures of Dignity and Victimhood","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Class (philosophy); Bridge (graph theory); Perfection; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.12594278984847757,"score_gpt":0.42622567575912707,"score_spread":0.3002828859106495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128227495","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0312228,0.6567987,0.0052063814,0.08598599,0.0024415236,0.00014910274,0.00016978546,0.000051256462,0.21797453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5829658,0.38610098,0.0050196303,0.011380779,0.0006471756,0.00010201688,0.00011890287,0.00004187559,0.013622808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896498,0.0039895717,0.00033984656,0.00058280985,0.0042448402,0.0011931108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99240416,0.0030600016,0.0008436656,0.0003437856,0.0026736236,0.0006747684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008843831,0.00048395424,0.0006662034,0.004604311,0.0067820773,0.00889716,0.0019491869,0.0023226973,0.0027984509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009008515,0.00020258923,0.00046919627,0.003639869,0.02381766,0.003528693,0.0030081286,0.0037696874,0.0001926611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000321551,0.000043072498,0.0042385175,0.0026916782,0.00009411972,0.00025335196,0.036984075,0.00046803363,0.00047791834,0.71175385,0.024774343,0.21818884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017526054,0.00006208136,0.023487015,0.008202613,0.00016204322,0.00030531152,0.035266556,0.00019824549,0.00046477883,0.063599095,0.8681611,0.00007372485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7911305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8748478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20886952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046589386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09286538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42019916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128227546","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v12i2.197","title":"Class Actions, Punitive Damages, and Decreasing Consumption of Tobacco Products","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Class action; Context (archaeology); Consumption (sociology); Damages; Misconduct; Enforcement; Tobacco industry","score_opus":0.11134751075236198,"score_gpt":0.3199324457707194,"score_spread":0.2085849350183574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128227546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18615565,0.00523537,0.007853718,0.046620242,0.0012741564,0.0003211126,0.00024224799,0.00010902429,0.75218844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9461883,0.0010108055,0.0010966709,0.010417266,0.000231979,0.00009414607,0.000050469524,0.0000150806045,0.040895272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99061525,0.002277604,0.00031171518,0.0007861789,0.004066527,0.0019426428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881132,0.004157892,0.0021397015,0.00059821445,0.003421905,0.0015691279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067044604,0.00038516353,0.00031305067,0.0013224996,0.0059089228,0.006061953,0.0015765107,0.006226731,0.01170665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014764487,0.00021657151,0.00059068843,0.00062378944,0.008616782,0.0017560885,0.003410819,0.005903771,0.0007098987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024890868,0.0011614602,0.045883257,0.00045922818,0.00022669882,0.00097324915,0.00550573,0.003880544,0.0025856248,0.7627107,0.07054653,0.105818145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022545925,0.0010492987,0.2118164,0.0019363051,0.00049555156,0.0007533988,0.008341047,0.0075959857,0.0057964334,0.27155685,0.4900546,0.0003786362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.113670126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28008467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8863299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013665871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0154017275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22601694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128227793","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v4i2.399","title":"Ontario’s Class Proceedings Fund: A Good (If Less than Perfect) Class Action Costs Model","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Class action; Control (management)","score_opus":0.0995244795083636,"score_gpt":0.2757512902816063,"score_spread":0.17622681077324268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128227793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024315566,0.006795618,0.024381699,0.13518134,0.0012852954,0.00080702535,0.0036368493,0.0002855948,0.803311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7684196,0.0043538515,0.010670285,0.020018328,0.0010735805,0.0006630162,0.00073636655,0.00013298944,0.19393189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838368,0.002344404,0.00034171864,0.0010885333,0.009675279,0.0027131161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98107576,0.004792387,0.0011984642,0.0014009202,0.00930524,0.002227252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009859362,0.0009186622,0.0010596138,0.0054876273,0.006730668,0.014692281,0.004295446,0.0072824527,0.015535165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02889118,0.0007058652,0.0009293788,0.0039456654,0.007382226,0.0052068233,0.0018316295,0.0041547026,0.0010067986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036881058,0.000022765204,0.0011433476,0.00010672488,0.00003261068,0.000045829893,0.0002740377,0.0026030573,0.0000527096,0.9060848,0.077776834,0.011820474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024879983,0.00006910899,0.010366008,0.0006945839,0.00034518758,0.00013500721,0.0008710414,0.011049237,0.00027694865,0.32089552,0.6548802,0.00016837899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90038174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9375158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099618256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09525746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12609272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69114447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128228888","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v9i1_213","title":"Judicial Consideration of us Proceedings in Canadian Class Action Settlement Approvals","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Class action; Human settlement; Action (physics); Class (philosophy)","score_opus":0.0431715959636538,"score_gpt":0.27511557365874245,"score_spread":0.23194397769508865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128228888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12098985,0.018820088,0.0069747744,0.053165875,0.0036577946,0.0010935426,0.001050028,0.00027847287,0.7939696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8741602,0.008958438,0.008689382,0.025732871,0.0010679055,0.000432379,0.00054569077,0.00010907998,0.080304004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9208254,0.011207799,0.004692936,0.0045245164,0.042146344,0.01660303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9205655,0.031726032,0.0031573623,0.0021908174,0.039827764,0.0025324966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041752663,0.0006919707,0.0010998584,0.008601699,0.033113874,0.017994713,0.0055179964,0.012834721,0.0043121404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10253577,0.0012833953,0.001564195,0.009408696,0.009632065,0.0029716825,0.004462036,0.011862145,0.0005496759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001711609,0.000089042165,0.008240224,0.00039522833,0.00010207587,0.0020325927,0.023579061,0.0011928956,0.0018394089,0.77872384,0.13112265,0.05251177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000128526,0.00014061874,0.028047804,0.0010205574,0.00040149348,0.0005483543,0.014188291,0.0019733424,0.0037475398,0.030503241,0.91882855,0.00047164646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9315409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9709014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086117074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.086117074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16994736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.624826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128229366","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i2.223","title":"Third Party Funding for Class Actions: Problems and Solutions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Third party; Class (philosophy); Economic Justice; Class action; Third world","score_opus":0.13148442767458723,"score_gpt":0.2900929691439829,"score_spread":0.15860854146939568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128229366","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017282117,0.06798905,0.0026596407,0.7972272,0.002943168,0.00010921875,0.0003624174,0.000059243303,0.11136791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64906716,0.09531372,0.0073631573,0.15445034,0.0055081295,0.0003189885,0.00047770853,0.000136433,0.087364286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9560105,0.0062435647,0.001905124,0.0030084066,0.023998946,0.008833417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9438166,0.020906331,0.0048976694,0.0028297082,0.022481095,0.00506867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025652897,0.00057551253,0.000968289,0.0046894657,0.015351892,0.013349978,0.0053407378,0.012101691,0.008417123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059887733,0.0007074889,0.0011951267,0.0068770265,0.018080916,0.0066578216,0.0057780547,0.008441276,0.0006593268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003403871,0.000034208744,0.0061081853,0.00080286054,0.000042581712,0.00060653366,0.0078013344,0.000585073,0.00016511936,0.73053664,0.15892449,0.09435887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000463859,0.00002373391,0.013440278,0.002241136,0.00004438677,0.00023671916,0.011076673,0.0006077628,0.00020316851,0.06345207,0.9085281,0.000099507444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.923168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94501096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1460453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1460453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20880583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9904664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128229371","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v2i2_375","title":"Typicality, Preferable Procedure, and Superiority: Ontario <i>Class Proceedings Act, 1992</i> and Rule 23 of the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Civil procedure; Government (linguistics); Legislation","score_opus":0.022781013862511704,"score_gpt":0.23504190459663885,"score_spread":0.21226089073412713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128229371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042880036,0.039201874,0.0045368467,0.1495182,0.001177574,0.00020794182,0.003093805,0.0000776555,0.759306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8762001,0.015581857,0.004741162,0.016992627,0.0007952099,0.00017152872,0.0009868165,0.000077985256,0.08445281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99127793,0.0013161623,0.0004905316,0.0006080048,0.0051349723,0.0011724631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988289,0.00354499,0.0011463127,0.000491745,0.0059152455,0.0006126575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005106384,0.00029472154,0.00032330176,0.0019677586,0.009461282,0.007750701,0.0014863684,0.004114409,0.0073182215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021074893,0.00043815246,0.00029927687,0.0039255763,0.01485694,0.003945401,0.0014076125,0.0039208303,0.00076982426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035410456,0.000016931117,0.0025741593,0.00008700614,0.000006917731,0.00006754457,0.003933897,0.00012720312,0.000095936855,0.86018753,0.11565959,0.017207887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006525234,0.000035596884,0.064638615,0.00087279227,0.00008419914,0.00016972497,0.008155236,0.0006756116,0.00041863817,0.20369989,0.72105265,0.0001317955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95983595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056738645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056738645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10194802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4116696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128229737","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v6i2.449","title":"The Space Between Rule 20 and 21: The Evidentiary Burden on Certification","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Meaning (existential); Supreme court; Test (biology); Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Common law; Space (punctuation); Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.0651739564324587,"score_gpt":0.35710822867018005,"score_spread":0.29193427223772134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128229737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061838306,0.017922912,0.085697316,0.16169229,0.003901515,0.0003644952,0.00034228194,0.00013587212,0.66810495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.868611,0.0066605024,0.026168127,0.06543934,0.0025999297,0.000317324,0.00015393169,0.00008051007,0.029969368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96152097,0.008221379,0.0029417528,0.00461431,0.019811207,0.0028903603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9723041,0.016799105,0.0023743452,0.002600005,0.005109112,0.0008132752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02367744,0.00048856705,0.0012770571,0.0022363535,0.006307959,0.010657211,0.0039907065,0.012092453,0.0027649254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043351043,0.0006167296,0.0013243229,0.0011567153,0.030893324,0.008050529,0.004676588,0.014903759,0.0011492436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071762292,0.000009110679,0.00017826304,0.000034808585,0.000004966327,0.00008843853,0.0005780539,0.00013200019,0.00015881982,0.9915876,0.0024611214,0.0047596674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003388236,0.00011253748,0.0012919988,0.0004936643,0.000033552446,0.00036332043,0.0008219296,0.00056588015,0.0007441121,0.8854237,0.1100437,0.0000717072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03453858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038399376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96546143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008960344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02625296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12521976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128230514","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i2.603","title":"Class Proceedings Vs. Arbitration in Canada: Resolving Class Conflict and Developing Guidelines","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Arbitration; Res judicata; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.05369270424257649,"score_gpt":0.2710420674559669,"score_spread":0.21734936321339038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128230514","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04400935,0.13050574,0.01801157,0.53456926,0.006358657,0.001585909,0.001940069,0.00027209296,0.2627474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71319705,0.07386037,0.041899994,0.09734757,0.0018683461,0.0014345997,0.0013983703,0.0003238053,0.06866998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93468904,0.017862149,0.004127682,0.00254146,0.03138902,0.00939062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.797216,0.07777713,0.009050412,0.0026006126,0.10435994,0.00899588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07271309,0.00062821765,0.001214646,0.015467468,0.021718634,0.017209567,0.0062840274,0.009542453,0.004369255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.176507,0.0011182704,0.000993777,0.016545711,0.009602688,0.0051092673,0.003542118,0.0109376535,0.00040542477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112932015,0.000090126596,0.0067553283,0.0016788567,0.00010476667,0.00027482695,0.014548874,0.0019987414,0.00033679858,0.40139368,0.39187866,0.18082629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017048769,0.000076681135,0.035882894,0.005755909,0.0003929166,0.00012665692,0.01698636,0.0033425041,0.0011436462,0.04128747,0.89449,0.00034436144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18028577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18028577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5577134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9507523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128230674","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v10i1-2.33","title":"Facets of Fairness: <i>Kidd v Canada Life Assurance Company</i> and the Approval of Class Action Settlements","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Settlement (finance); Context (archaeology); Appeal; Human settlement; Pension","score_opus":0.058418378283602156,"score_gpt":0.2645327690796652,"score_spread":0.20611439079606306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128230674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07643289,0.0047882297,0.0070044473,0.16970429,0.0014569162,0.00038073657,0.00029211637,0.00011009642,0.73983026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8596839,0.0011747844,0.0031403261,0.05817533,0.00042494512,0.00020326397,0.00008217676,0.000067498586,0.07704785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9662654,0.0052958075,0.0012544491,0.0033116813,0.013541309,0.010331388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98733044,0.0057280767,0.00073421677,0.00090213754,0.0037462665,0.0015589797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01811829,0.00045929803,0.00081045757,0.0019239691,0.036629282,0.023183698,0.0041003204,0.02051268,0.004795142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036396943,0.0007944991,0.00091532373,0.0021147,0.031108376,0.005277848,0.0071094604,0.018107973,0.00045527206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018424427,0.00002013406,0.0015840413,0.000031824937,0.000010640882,0.00033802513,0.007962432,0.00015643628,0.00016125961,0.96022564,0.023314428,0.006176775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019837086,0.00009611572,0.020651527,0.00077309815,0.00017141752,0.0008225491,0.03177289,0.0025978396,0.0025613764,0.39271733,0.5471524,0.00048502453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87512803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9055894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12487197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0571098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10084457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41436255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128235568","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i2.311","title":"Economic Analysis of Materiality for Canadian Securities Litigation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Materiality (auditing); Misrepresentation; Issuer; Liability; Economic analysis; Valuation (finance); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.0904720653575501,"score_gpt":0.2513350238040156,"score_spread":0.16086295844646553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128235568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3913413,0.019060481,0.019765675,0.03541815,0.0004671649,0.0008833959,0.0029937255,0.00012395489,0.52994615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96988946,0.0073172273,0.002577947,0.00067263265,0.00017287029,0.0001055786,0.00047885173,0.000018195755,0.0187673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98480934,0.0027090958,0.00041397748,0.0006128933,0.0086075645,0.002847142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9714659,0.016073186,0.0031600066,0.00089506496,0.007466437,0.00093927595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009727332,0.00047973052,0.0006941305,0.011821356,0.0056546135,0.008451954,0.0019603483,0.0023820898,0.007733306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045256227,0.00043273953,0.0010860566,0.008584792,0.005143184,0.0024675804,0.0016857521,0.0028851263,0.0002471869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055533867,0.00005273982,0.009795686,0.00014347426,0.000058329908,0.00034243407,0.00061717717,0.015171507,0.00013220013,0.94334155,0.012453271,0.017836053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012787344,0.00023319719,0.19886671,0.0009931951,0.00066438253,0.00060615374,0.0064448225,0.14193542,0.001123615,0.48129854,0.16721827,0.0004878404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89883024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92367923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113522045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.113522045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.081780806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82366395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128236326","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v6i2.431","title":"Certification Rates in Ontario Versus The Rest of Canada: Why the Disparity?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Rest (music); Plaintiff; Consistency (knowledge bases); Class action; Common law; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.07727410158364759,"score_gpt":0.32370167984862935,"score_spread":0.24642757826498177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128236326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62418205,0.09561233,0.0018221413,0.10113865,0.0016113239,0.00043891938,0.027975313,0.00014878601,0.14707042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779373,0.010340281,0.00053990696,0.0046016187,0.00016598188,0.00008916421,0.0034140195,0.00004980544,0.0028618649],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98551244,0.0012296174,0.0013029522,0.0014317262,0.007693425,0.002829759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94041216,0.0058342633,0.0080562,0.001448027,0.039231393,0.005017961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012286496,0.00026350372,0.00084779074,0.009198299,0.0035108945,0.0036137993,0.0024472973,0.0009924769,0.003595078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045362577,0.00039251838,0.00057151937,0.015218456,0.0029120469,0.0016291164,0.001604064,0.0012040294,0.00021176298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041837464,0.00008134909,0.69003695,0.002980855,0.0005597422,0.000558212,0.021305341,0.0006852905,0.0010509515,0.026389832,0.10419104,0.151742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028106668,0.000026002972,0.9566933,0.000787523,0.000108476925,0.000112155525,0.0051097646,0.00017054882,0.00018940879,0.00055303477,0.036182802,0.000038966795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99369437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078525715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.078525715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0875508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5697466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128236769","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v11i1.3","title":"L’étape du Recouvrement en Matière de Recours Collectif : Les Enjeux et les Objectifs Sociaux","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Collective action; Confusion; Authorization; Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.09336310246203268,"score_gpt":0.3144363930022781,"score_spread":0.22107329054024544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128236769","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026517132,0.8249755,0.0013333068,0.033238985,0.0015979704,0.00006721563,0.00035175876,0.00003317646,0.11188503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44034725,0.46414542,0.0021016095,0.0067406762,0.0006561188,0.00006545261,0.00035351777,0.000045467856,0.08554442],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933088,0.0017190574,0.00024285856,0.00045265784,0.0034273788,0.00084922696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906233,0.0020353626,0.00088408793,0.00025409675,0.0056388723,0.0005643547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008236468,0.0004367422,0.00053449336,0.0035554795,0.005923276,0.0073947213,0.0020403224,0.0018664472,0.005561087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010089153,0.00027591264,0.00043140855,0.006257751,0.0063066673,0.0020202,0.0011378061,0.0020620713,0.0004938721],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013467474,0.000080250335,0.007862509,0.0044600745,0.00011958656,0.00055859314,0.018489907,0.0014919887,0.00085199735,0.33802378,0.09565105,0.53227556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011989661,0.000031060663,0.023114095,0.0022040147,0.000042582265,0.000111090885,0.0044309893,0.00016826553,0.0002920186,0.0021763914,0.9673761,0.000041469888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.981874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9888887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07406563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07406563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13443446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5373863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128237023","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i2.335","title":"The Increasing Settlement Costs of Mass Privacy Breaches","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Settlement (finance); Human settlement; Appeal; Intrusion; Tort; Mass tort; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.08748923583546808,"score_gpt":0.37850383064787857,"score_spread":0.2910145948124105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128237023","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0808996,0.65931815,0.002398077,0.08705049,0.0016494351,0.00026055204,0.0011265369,0.000040293693,0.16725685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6846633,0.29216114,0.0017590414,0.008986953,0.0010794807,0.00011624552,0.00042721722,0.00002212626,0.010784627],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96761703,0.006908236,0.0013095321,0.0017195425,0.019474799,0.0029707688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9360634,0.02362613,0.013500287,0.0015639309,0.02373384,0.0015123829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017794194,0.00045521263,0.00094894355,0.0061965715,0.0035692453,0.0071587446,0.0031173297,0.0038005188,0.012625092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04963601,0.0003723694,0.0013318767,0.005280973,0.006059911,0.0029817245,0.0023127736,0.0048200777,0.00048386425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006859541,0.00025729463,0.030167695,0.014613027,0.0013734438,0.0011501157,0.0034918163,0.0038946501,0.0010447598,0.19462003,0.095839314,0.652862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042544727,0.00058221695,0.21997717,0.040443692,0.0030304417,0.0022688066,0.011827594,0.0018873304,0.0024179886,0.040443566,0.6764543,0.00024140485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52593106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7083757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47406894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04538421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045455113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95372164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128237285","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i2.243","title":"The Fiction of Representative Plaintiff Liability: An Examination of Fee Shifting and Liability for Costs Within the Ontario Class Action Regime","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Discretion; Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Misrepresentation; Liability; Statutory law; Damages","score_opus":0.050010949817039435,"score_gpt":0.2900500588497945,"score_spread":0.24003910903275508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128237285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2387803,0.0049295365,0.008808406,0.05911096,0.00024305764,0.00014413548,0.00015961679,0.000029508823,0.6877944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9581177,0.0021137407,0.0016890924,0.0029942389,0.00011191427,0.000043449058,0.000024120574,0.000014432312,0.034891214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99487656,0.0006637359,0.000116325915,0.00036832818,0.0028734545,0.0011016317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99496436,0.002562608,0.0005316832,0.0002532326,0.0013849826,0.00030314308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027552198,0.00021984983,0.0002858576,0.0015884798,0.010626842,0.0067277,0.0017347455,0.0036446238,0.0036523528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072513237,0.00035225422,0.00047859873,0.001441448,0.018666016,0.0036265652,0.0026622682,0.0034737613,0.00017326538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013613784,0.000013720505,0.0039731944,0.00005845193,0.000007050463,0.0006703921,0.0128385015,0.0005295804,0.00039210258,0.9673624,0.0048172767,0.009323683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044722117,0.00009167705,0.048192512,0.00077129056,0.00011566308,0.0009936737,0.037523247,0.0064750942,0.0015877603,0.32403117,0.5799772,0.00019610889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87167066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9297745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12832934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09048907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049968947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6565472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128237462","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v6i2.297","title":"<i>Cy Pres</i> Awards in Canadian Class Actions: A Critical Interrogation of what is Meant By “As Near as Possible”","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Class (philosophy); Settlement (finance); Class action; Ideal (ethics); Human settlement","score_opus":0.02459152054970814,"score_gpt":0.31238086018776184,"score_spread":0.2877893396380537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128237462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081772625,0.08275765,0.0050748778,0.18584932,0.001715651,0.00023397885,0.00031855828,0.000076144875,0.6422012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8995277,0.029133108,0.0028109138,0.02524557,0.0005779153,0.000078160876,0.00008820332,0.000040463765,0.042497948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9745616,0.004684178,0.00086910767,0.0012077376,0.013807294,0.004870094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98107094,0.008632715,0.0013775063,0.00049954146,0.0077464525,0.000672828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017726416,0.00044188852,0.0005383344,0.005332633,0.018959837,0.01548776,0.003878238,0.0067104013,0.0025204914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03166379,0.00044346802,0.00066845387,0.006087551,0.020196978,0.0040553124,0.002860251,0.005921546,0.00018534517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015217064,0.000015726959,0.0014558736,0.0002750522,0.000014689001,0.00027503385,0.010224812,0.0004792323,0.0002899617,0.9292488,0.03086961,0.026835967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051810173,0.00006463431,0.021115799,0.0011739815,0.00014498064,0.0002517093,0.0299367,0.0015332019,0.0015137398,0.07117121,0.8727678,0.00027438832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9747346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12680215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12680215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18506269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92001826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128237509","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i1.261","title":"Class Actions Against Multiple Defendants in Quebec: The Issues of Legal Interest and Standing to Sue","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Res judicata; Class action; Action (physics); Liability","score_opus":0.05856785960879508,"score_gpt":0.2937398207074044,"score_spread":0.23517196109860933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128237509","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14304686,0.29668042,0.0019808316,0.3133435,0.006253712,0.00077941327,0.0059725344,0.00012015331,0.23182254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67336804,0.12316,0.0026205112,0.07322948,0.0018060087,0.00035162273,0.0023726672,0.00009594018,0.12299581],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837414,0.0019856424,0.0010326764,0.0008181255,0.008897783,0.003524319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9478246,0.012780417,0.0038004362,0.00078804005,0.030242987,0.004563543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017675277,0.0006081194,0.0011047876,0.009345666,0.016329287,0.008901169,0.0052578337,0.011360841,0.00674644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03681067,0.0008086883,0.0010478467,0.011580725,0.004754733,0.0024204198,0.001921216,0.008463783,0.0005389058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028623533,0.00017645399,0.043708738,0.0018766285,0.00034389735,0.0010957604,0.007873435,0.0017111275,0.00048190012,0.0657464,0.7095973,0.1671022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002448928,0.000115612136,0.21536952,0.0051525403,0.0008989271,0.00041216778,0.014427218,0.0017499216,0.0006915763,0.0053811367,0.7551657,0.0003907344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99886775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110427774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.110427774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2973488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8012133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128239136","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v6i2.331","title":"La Dissuasion : 10 Ans de Jurisprudence Canadienne en Matière D’autorisation D’exerc er un Recours Collectif","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Jurisprudence; Function (biology); Analogy; Class action","score_opus":0.0146396095692635,"score_gpt":0.25647703678614386,"score_spread":0.24183742721688037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128239136","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017834311,0.06630133,0.0032003259,0.6757661,0.012176184,0.00009504405,0.00023303801,0.00012371103,0.22426991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45056662,0.023371328,0.0064282133,0.3554255,0.006861025,0.00019223959,0.00020202545,0.00022231745,0.15673077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96907055,0.005737335,0.0012216709,0.0031918206,0.017705686,0.0030729382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96699667,0.013601969,0.001125202,0.0014591864,0.015151766,0.0016652676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020152714,0.0006186444,0.0008100932,0.002660313,0.015763152,0.016504329,0.0039256453,0.014394473,0.0038702548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03235155,0.00046790863,0.0010725647,0.002881107,0.03619477,0.005651692,0.0049577006,0.020640926,0.0012712973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003911668,0.000025371693,0.00066208217,0.00016958486,0.000012422147,0.00025078843,0.01427352,0.00011985273,0.00046964036,0.83104175,0.13508809,0.017847836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002893336,0.00001731931,0.0026116874,0.00042559614,0.000022220904,0.00013392272,0.0041395095,0.00022180709,0.00039839584,0.038594052,0.95334214,0.000064391774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82330453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81526965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17669547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07781322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.107245125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5645771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128239228","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v6i1.119","title":"Preliminary Merits Review for Class Actions in Ontario: Thanks, but no Thanks!","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Control (management); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.055224077668961084,"score_gpt":0.28655557755995764,"score_spread":0.23133149989099655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128239228","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009194661,0.029085439,0.0016826441,0.55907804,0.066655815,0.004464897,0.01644485,0.0006630198,0.3127307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040599164,0.0146496715,0.0041513597,0.1299098,0.0094894525,0.0016395404,0.0065550287,0.00038420188,0.7926218],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96735805,0.0015701057,0.002231749,0.0012679442,0.022636183,0.004936057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8327104,0.008753576,0.0034305742,0.003927908,0.14022548,0.010952044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01970668,0.0008735359,0.0014736055,0.00616426,0.011251689,0.009756956,0.0042759567,0.01626618,0.04209415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075747706,0.0012689735,0.0018215238,0.005902224,0.0030410155,0.002728294,0.0023814416,0.008045523,0.008405729],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043036136,0.000015426353,0.0007248603,0.00022879556,0.000016121368,0.00008243288,0.0002484763,0.000026303096,0.00014398765,0.0031176032,0.9869926,0.008360311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036589186,0.000014306055,0.005133637,0.0002685141,0.000042698794,0.000025392756,0.00028207016,0.000047333127,0.00013216355,0.00033439338,0.9936521,0.000030845313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93873686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97575253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0738363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0738363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31203556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5357224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128239449","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v9i2.271","title":"Paving the Way for Overtime Class Actions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Overtime; Legislation; Class (philosophy); Appeal; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.05720415587066531,"score_gpt":0.2835470121437708,"score_spread":0.22634285627310552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128239449","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04622346,0.032301646,0.01203184,0.15689749,0.005637978,0.0011922676,0.00085541664,0.0004014866,0.7444585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58692586,0.013326431,0.011742619,0.069853075,0.0017231068,0.00045253156,0.0008944357,0.00019162217,0.3148904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9461686,0.004800343,0.0021878404,0.0031671266,0.033881508,0.009794595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9491927,0.014520644,0.0048149624,0.0028041601,0.024231965,0.0044355416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021809027,0.00045217964,0.0006092329,0.0037446965,0.014440006,0.01212793,0.0052073817,0.009346676,0.009805237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05091631,0.0007288192,0.0008261738,0.0019903886,0.009727089,0.0038652061,0.004146354,0.010871422,0.0015496403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006142576,0.000084506915,0.0046552354,0.0006760228,0.000026246691,0.000768992,0.012711435,0.00052205025,0.0016981115,0.513832,0.31251633,0.15244767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027374987,0.000039222916,0.010460703,0.0006763776,0.00002218789,0.00011616269,0.0029214066,0.00019226363,0.000621425,0.007810265,0.9770396,0.00007303158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84052444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92079085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15947556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059324067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19555376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43042827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128240929","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v4i2.258","title":"Adapting to Climate Change: A Look at Three Controversial Developments that are Heating Up the Canadian Class Action Debate","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Climate change; Government (linguistics); Class action","score_opus":0.1687843039754501,"score_gpt":0.33850222181454553,"score_spread":0.16971791783909543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128240929","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008756679,0.1223464,0.00049121963,0.7623677,0.006420679,0.000071709794,0.0003893037,0.00003332685,0.09912292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29173493,0.13374037,0.0019149258,0.5067685,0.0062288838,0.00017831376,0.00052667566,0.00016290309,0.058744512],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800566,0.0021798606,0.00043148562,0.00082734897,0.011082852,0.0054218266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97050416,0.009299351,0.0011326675,0.0005812352,0.015087751,0.0033948317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016688107,0.00072442566,0.001011483,0.007138769,0.031514823,0.021591496,0.005977068,0.016735882,0.0052583027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035600264,0.00058450055,0.0012167287,0.013140347,0.01800453,0.0043726456,0.0038163445,0.017693484,0.00043069315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007940495,0.000039568306,0.0019952848,0.0010973994,0.0000750362,0.00033202,0.016631223,0.0004925955,0.0005244727,0.2737769,0.6559409,0.04901526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035954898,0.0000112364205,0.010715668,0.0008698431,0.00009287897,0.000043518296,0.012106108,0.00011241346,0.00019275716,0.009036152,0.96667504,0.0001084439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16178483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16178483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3465405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97221076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128241995","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i2.339","title":"Using Class Actions to Redress Historical Wrongs Committed by the Government","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Class action; Settlement (finance); Government (linguistics); Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Compensation (psychology)","score_opus":0.08871225043902511,"score_gpt":0.28598279306185076,"score_spread":0.19727054262282565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128241995","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010887722,0.7831681,0.002563711,0.046659462,0.002737841,0.00015793247,0.00007959457,0.00006748284,0.15367812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3625945,0.584463,0.004730287,0.018095465,0.0009802596,0.00010826773,0.00011995636,0.000044275377,0.02886403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.981573,0.0052732816,0.0010440187,0.00074944546,0.008841943,0.0025184294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97905934,0.008596909,0.0024057948,0.0008587739,0.008379183,0.0006999607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019862162,0.00044090414,0.0007328856,0.0074301832,0.0049565597,0.007035124,0.0029584991,0.0032606234,0.00216494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023458315,0.00026701068,0.00060710014,0.004856051,0.011354025,0.0027202687,0.00198197,0.0032707788,0.00041814288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003287941,0.00006340011,0.0018953491,0.0036526355,0.000091850794,0.0003184383,0.0065314504,0.00080723286,0.0004844328,0.5241594,0.087298684,0.37466428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017412063,0.000050674673,0.0050653946,0.0048192274,0.00011319623,0.00017940016,0.0039661266,0.00014109765,0.0006274344,0.009151773,0.9758118,0.000056416426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6409262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7564423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35907382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027366385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06737674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72237694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128242537","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v6i2.261","title":"Revitalizing Environmental Class Actions: Quebecois Lessons for English Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Compensation (psychology); Social class; Class action; Environmental studies; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.0499164455785743,"score_gpt":0.3380613849888634,"score_spread":0.28814493941028907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128242537","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16543862,0.07507298,0.0027353507,0.43399715,0.0024550764,0.000252635,0.0011384677,0.00010095219,0.31880876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8156989,0.025025703,0.0025539303,0.06071547,0.00030334588,0.00009818293,0.00028904583,0.000058615406,0.095256686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994932,0.00080626574,0.00013432828,0.00030688875,0.0016804357,0.0021400712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98903334,0.0033370848,0.00040793556,0.0002768236,0.0055125873,0.0014321748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055524968,0.000310337,0.00039285756,0.0018526202,0.013721785,0.0077071544,0.002076878,0.003349591,0.005875223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010627182,0.00021211074,0.0003706167,0.0028205293,0.0056466428,0.002523171,0.00224464,0.003600045,0.00021592905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010011611,0.00010985226,0.01741981,0.0006293553,0.00006936129,0.0016705155,0.03141811,0.0016068877,0.0007656523,0.559018,0.25583452,0.13135779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044822074,0.000038049508,0.029787423,0.0008363033,0.00008353989,0.00016258712,0.03223273,0.0006991742,0.00044458514,0.013557962,0.92201847,0.00009428568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13147077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13147077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25377142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95389163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128242591","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i1.005","title":"Questions About Leave Test for Secondary Market Claims Remain Unanswered After Court of Appeal Decision in <i>Rahimi V Southgobi Resources Ltd</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Issuer; Test (biology); High Court; Federal court; Court of record; Remand (court procedure)","score_opus":0.02316075692114236,"score_gpt":0.3274152954170828,"score_spread":0.3042545384959404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128242591","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04686584,0.032255214,0.004771287,0.45856023,0.006676441,0.0005176832,0.0010407484,0.00016205026,0.4491506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6210543,0.013958679,0.005384788,0.24898098,0.004371665,0.0003676634,0.00066339126,0.00012149044,0.10509698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751729,0.0025535882,0.0015103201,0.0024682602,0.01365672,0.004638234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9589691,0.022380238,0.0019176124,0.0010465445,0.013600119,0.0020864336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024176732,0.0003783036,0.00092580204,0.0028385685,0.009604095,0.008154212,0.0047051804,0.013092992,0.0042824256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058850992,0.0005201567,0.001115375,0.0016363941,0.013322541,0.003192882,0.0024249593,0.011857975,0.0013394289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006859409,0.00005045382,0.0066124042,0.0005815809,0.000050652397,0.0018552606,0.008408165,0.00020660511,0.0013487323,0.69837624,0.22952493,0.052916273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009268549,0.0001263517,0.01725411,0.0025486506,0.0002059864,0.0007972167,0.0075050485,0.00059770246,0.0023985975,0.07688655,0.8913895,0.00019764947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54875433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7222072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45124567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027686216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08109392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9078063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128246489","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i1.71","title":"Palpable and Overriding Confusion: Appellate Review of Certification Orders in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Appeal; Class action; Legislature; Class (philosophy); Order (exchange); Civil procedure","score_opus":0.06503410693382024,"score_gpt":0.23473476106393015,"score_spread":0.16970065413010993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128246489","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26205352,0.024368737,0.0070770965,0.4465096,0.002757424,0.00076173735,0.0005892563,0.00027801492,0.25560465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91152966,0.0057783984,0.0041750716,0.0439133,0.0003908018,0.000076346645,0.00019267252,0.00006917061,0.0338746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9349867,0.008681048,0.0036045674,0.0039449055,0.035558112,0.013224595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.858718,0.040432032,0.008174438,0.0040139817,0.07741547,0.011246093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032247018,0.0002408102,0.0006901497,0.0046264976,0.024804043,0.016626708,0.004404357,0.00854177,0.002431062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.113928646,0.0009514441,0.00060790207,0.006198172,0.011476995,0.0030292976,0.005085325,0.007527355,0.00026463898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019316631,0.00022042547,0.07139932,0.0010106912,0.00020870232,0.005275382,0.07262965,0.0052857837,0.0033521324,0.391324,0.2546309,0.19446982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001003084,0.00013503004,0.14079371,0.001157133,0.00020366115,0.0008552983,0.035278033,0.004355389,0.002079506,0.020251669,0.7941977,0.000592575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9887111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99557257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19526535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19526535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4008652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9333781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128246501","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v9i2.355","title":"Accumulating Wisdom: An Updated Empirical Examination of Class Counsel’s Fees in Ontario Class Actions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Empirical research; Empirical examination; Compensation (psychology); Class action; World class","score_opus":0.11257524384915082,"score_gpt":0.3275921803295762,"score_spread":0.21501693648042539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128246501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8922899,0.0035506866,0.00044826788,0.0075524016,0.000063600346,0.00014557056,0.0014419344,0.00001211484,0.09449552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99106604,0.001862654,0.0002888423,0.00044571667,0.000033367785,0.000027466,0.00038445153,0.000008201924,0.0058833314],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98598653,0.0010020422,0.00061965897,0.00055360165,0.01036521,0.0014729938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.891259,0.031206211,0.022638302,0.0021712952,0.048703127,0.004022062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009280456,0.00016917169,0.0005872407,0.008341867,0.007864814,0.005458718,0.0016917057,0.0009756795,0.004643521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074407645,0.000302907,0.00024321917,0.011183915,0.003531016,0.0028930523,0.002203243,0.0015376272,0.0002466459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011941635,0.00012742802,0.7153781,0.000548093,0.000105500796,0.00072932435,0.11866487,0.00060664635,0.0003250327,0.032061275,0.02293521,0.1083991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011762053,0.000026542266,0.9081201,0.00040826015,0.00007403438,0.00010030741,0.043690976,0.0004600691,0.00016790738,0.0012908106,0.04560588,0.000043285218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97759205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99220055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076211415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.076211415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11133322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55295515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128246541","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v5i1.49","title":"U.S. Protective Orders in Canadian Class Actions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.06526268784111834,"score_gpt":0.27838581895204695,"score_spread":0.21312313111092862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128246541","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01877611,0.50780106,0.0008721419,0.11445737,0.004686555,0.00025527467,0.009679689,0.00012961587,0.3433422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47229978,0.39080682,0.0026965328,0.052930042,0.0018596,0.0002241007,0.0073438673,0.00012668164,0.07171261],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985129,0.00087753433,0.00085110747,0.00073292974,0.0100934105,0.0023160751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9352345,0.008610525,0.0036645893,0.0010760698,0.048781052,0.0026332482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011155143,0.00050841767,0.00058305974,0.011069372,0.0069193193,0.008687809,0.002855331,0.003294996,0.006331183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041512094,0.00053994625,0.0007525263,0.019236626,0.0032182918,0.0017651931,0.0012948342,0.0040828255,0.0006208393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009584559,0.000032069063,0.0054757064,0.0019633586,0.00006045805,0.00014101845,0.0017495643,0.0007937328,0.0002194392,0.104239486,0.7254857,0.15974362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028621474,0.000023553712,0.03751634,0.0023458216,0.00016013987,0.000064495245,0.001199357,0.00017596885,0.0002983322,0.0023181362,0.9558042,0.00006504381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99181414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99539196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11970166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11970166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28402483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8685004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128248843","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v4i2.459","title":"De La Théorie des Troubles de Voisinage en Matière de Recours Collectif; Un Débat Clos?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neighbourhood (mathematics); Plaintiff; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Annoyance","score_opus":0.024865746114377137,"score_gpt":0.26645084098045635,"score_spread":0.2415850948660792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128248843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070661284,0.02742678,0.09380727,0.14935331,0.0008158328,0.000094867646,0.00042821805,0.00018308326,0.6572294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9121422,0.007207663,0.006553761,0.0031013465,0.00076798967,0.00008313238,0.00009105697,0.000114775656,0.06993806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696475,0.0009034107,0.00006673538,0.0005079593,0.0008624822,0.00069462054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949656,0.0022886717,0.0006606972,0.0007585405,0.0009629383,0.00036355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003971487,0.000669785,0.0010560136,0.002940136,0.00547422,0.00785188,0.004076947,0.0052426327,0.020567581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010465871,0.00068746874,0.0012656467,0.0029705127,0.032820486,0.014458816,0.0033112627,0.005441876,0.0015765723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018995426,0.000003549229,0.0002209322,0.00000995988,0.000002399102,0.00002511217,0.00047196835,0.0003005268,0.0000058337196,0.99619484,0.0014604836,0.0013025313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009801707,0.0000048856377,0.00090605684,0.000077224286,0.000008040142,0.00009049485,0.0008464488,0.0023127145,0.000026793372,0.95822024,0.037483674,0.000013555035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2973423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25071293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7026577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027427068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010095884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5912231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128249169","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v4i1.83","title":"Multiple Defendant Class Actions in Quebec: Recent Developments in the Jurisprudence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Legislation","score_opus":0.06809456782126774,"score_gpt":0.3070941885239821,"score_spread":0.23899962070271438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128249169","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021766955,0.6633519,0.0023360818,0.20071043,0.0056331772,0.000203581,0.001924275,0.00009053369,0.103983074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39242068,0.44901106,0.005322743,0.0803311,0.0042926604,0.00023871922,0.0016980919,0.00013904227,0.06654584],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801477,0.002638152,0.0015687805,0.001753852,0.01180477,0.0020867768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9121919,0.030823814,0.0051765777,0.001098601,0.047116883,0.003592243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023302492,0.0006872647,0.00167969,0.013303412,0.010344664,0.01342921,0.0061128214,0.009785766,0.009437636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047460977,0.0008662484,0.0012162704,0.016493086,0.006570434,0.0036008356,0.0020986572,0.007040086,0.00042686335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020266061,0.00015539463,0.016024133,0.0053667007,0.00030732874,0.0008761608,0.0052658087,0.0031458803,0.00060157385,0.16992238,0.46389553,0.3342365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011039258,0.000060528688,0.06252387,0.004640263,0.00037569663,0.00028574542,0.0027119266,0.0013019805,0.00037927862,0.0065418975,0.9208811,0.00018730138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99381495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99761665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17345706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17345706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3258005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95867264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128250562","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v10i1-2.173","title":"The Impact of the Supreme Court of Canada’s Decision in <i>Infineon Technologies AG v Option Consommateurs</i> on Quebec Class Actions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Class (philosophy); Authorization; Action (physics); Class action; High Court","score_opus":0.04769267322101335,"score_gpt":0.28922603854750994,"score_spread":0.2415333653264966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128250562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06729055,0.03666499,0.0011936784,0.30780777,0.004588868,0.0002667657,0.002289148,0.000102599006,0.57979566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72132784,0.01477896,0.0013468248,0.14206603,0.0014099138,0.00012530606,0.0006947828,0.000109498586,0.11814089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783174,0.002243736,0.0006942477,0.0015820048,0.010588022,0.0065745725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9594665,0.015847487,0.0011689595,0.00082951353,0.019647088,0.0030405056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01519447,0.00053654966,0.00079071324,0.004169009,0.017963585,0.014377449,0.0047084307,0.012873257,0.008185633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03788021,0.00074134726,0.001227567,0.0040507275,0.008576678,0.002680389,0.0021539212,0.0126468055,0.00063836743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017421569,0.000064345266,0.0054534962,0.00042303323,0.00012897195,0.0011230638,0.0039533013,0.0013458374,0.0008876865,0.53710735,0.4124396,0.036899157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025318377,0.00008840165,0.033039223,0.001681006,0.00047328978,0.00018427998,0.005409115,0.0016247731,0.0018869352,0.021501256,0.93340313,0.00045538673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9926407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99647695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17476115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17476115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23797491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9571601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128250618","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v11i2.293","title":"Class Action Trends in Quebec and What they Mean for Your Business","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Appeal; Res judicata; Class action; Supreme court; Petitioner; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.06444011967867375,"score_gpt":0.29970025783485493,"score_spread":0.2352601381561812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128250618","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06805101,0.30671278,0.00093409256,0.34125325,0.0020128102,0.00008863056,0.002428876,0.000096834425,0.2784218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7509076,0.13427284,0.0016636843,0.03954839,0.00067149336,0.000058725127,0.00094998855,0.000076138516,0.0718512],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551445,0.0005718581,0.00014615302,0.00034752197,0.0021043567,0.001315613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98838824,0.0018604624,0.001045045,0.0002527753,0.0068628117,0.001590712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004740963,0.00026121075,0.00031724194,0.003666409,0.008346444,0.010362233,0.0020853688,0.0027732723,0.012465792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008647259,0.00022957782,0.00045253473,0.005459492,0.006025532,0.002384354,0.00094295514,0.0030072008,0.0005759562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081322505,0.00010169687,0.029051842,0.0011259228,0.000058423433,0.0005405138,0.0129027,0.0008438105,0.0005912308,0.30563653,0.3674306,0.28163543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015336867,0.00002664824,0.07157663,0.0016997905,0.00004024321,0.00014578065,0.009024722,0.0002808246,0.00020702324,0.003958995,0.9129519,0.00007216878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99585766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1787107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1787107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1544657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9525792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128250771","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i1.99","title":"Some Reflections on The “Responsible Issuer” Definition and Jurisdictional Aspects of Securities Class Actions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Plaintiff; Jurisdiction; Issuer; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Misrepresentation; Statutory law; Pleading; Legislation; Extraterritoriality","score_opus":0.19401747695125843,"score_gpt":0.3988025013583506,"score_spread":0.20478502440709218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128250771","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0252172,0.012164318,0.031060897,0.5785688,0.0013469539,0.00012862404,0.0002432796,0.00005358832,0.35121635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8686824,0.004822532,0.011048543,0.077921554,0.0021814678,0.00019591801,0.000095719675,0.00011832558,0.034933407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96809644,0.011880297,0.0012595722,0.004399865,0.009386168,0.004977621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98132503,0.012372346,0.0008297774,0.0011648448,0.0035669107,0.0007410675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024639143,0.00084169506,0.0012032734,0.002202954,0.017138112,0.024277057,0.010027269,0.019782385,0.003837506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022819068,0.0011043835,0.0015124853,0.0020488387,0.11918938,0.016802229,0.006147868,0.026185112,0.00042590327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018786117,0.0000026047885,0.00007167317,0.000006323943,0.0000011373695,0.000045578705,0.0035215626,0.000048926333,0.000030484196,0.9938175,0.0019828577,0.00046945835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028174893,0.000017738326,0.0015644772,0.0003175603,0.000019957813,0.00018203253,0.011661247,0.0010311655,0.0003777212,0.8071047,0.1776237,0.0000715998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5607283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52142483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5607283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059125267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03746976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8837173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128250779","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i2.215","title":"Pharmaceutical Class Actions and Effective Behaviour Modification: Avoiding Ford <i>Pintos</i> Through Punitive Damages","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Deterrence (psychology); Deterrence theory; Damages; Class action; Supreme court","score_opus":0.17363372383199696,"score_gpt":0.3460725674421547,"score_spread":0.17243884361015774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128250779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042509016,0.075717,0.017672487,0.15625899,0.0015782046,0.00030451585,0.000051253486,0.00010552992,0.70580304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86464643,0.022459459,0.006026156,0.042238966,0.00059901696,0.00012676998,0.00002589507,0.00001868164,0.063858524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98881394,0.0028026677,0.0004050876,0.0006209087,0.0055848965,0.0017724794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98914707,0.005859451,0.0018716477,0.0005031861,0.00214464,0.00047393297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006016939,0.000360202,0.0003317916,0.0014594253,0.0041349772,0.005529,0.002106568,0.00624167,0.0032460052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016949432,0.00018835747,0.00047818306,0.00084988354,0.013115883,0.0020555407,0.0023276042,0.0041921693,0.00030257623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021111597,0.0000533173,0.0017924666,0.0003207775,0.000020331694,0.0003060393,0.0024347573,0.000958722,0.0002912582,0.89002335,0.017477464,0.086300366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081862294,0.0002041784,0.016434515,0.001954263,0.00014150918,0.00093138654,0.0051264134,0.002135803,0.0026276463,0.21849214,0.75173396,0.00013625674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28132236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44343454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28132236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015398489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03463815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5593698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}