{"meta":{"query_hash":"6d5a6e18291e","filters":{"venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence"},"cohort_total":113,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":113,"exported":113,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6d5a6e18291e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Canadian+Journal+of+Law+%26+Jurisprudence"},"results":[{"id":"W1448862946","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002472","title":"Can Pragmatism Overcome the Impasse in Contemporary Legal Theory?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Pragmatism; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Legal realism; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Legal research","score_opus":0.03241627777524131,"score_gpt":0.28418534158856035,"score_spread":0.25176906381331904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1448862946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2511528,0.03059319,0.00002937469,0.15577395,0.0023681873,0.0005997366,0.000066658045,0.000029356592,0.55938673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99289113,0.00031272176,0.000045814726,0.0033658256,0.00037672115,0.0000032969274,3.673673e-7,0.000009026299,0.0029951143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982295,0.00047604492,0.00035033107,0.000114442126,0.00040296593,0.0004267395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987001,0.00020812282,0.00022606291,0.00017450748,0.00014612288,0.0005451143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016933598,0.00011510252,0.00019988067,0.000021279475,0.0007757595,0.00025050796,0.0008022676,0.00014228412,0.00073101604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023499249,0.00008127244,0.0001391281,0.0003154706,0.0009057957,0.0005978214,0.000012591502,0.00058634183,0.00001924211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004103732,0.000016253252,0.0030607514,0.000005355294,0.000022471215,0.00045388547,0.055948902,0.000011679136,0.0000137496345,0.9008867,0.039002065,0.0005741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031651743,0.000051452596,0.0034734767,0.00015310664,0.000014952869,0.000091468966,0.010792529,0.0000055714436,0.000022431652,0.029607076,0.9552875,0.00018390875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089579225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57429373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91628546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031844064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012710218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91648334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1468194871","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005178","title":"Legal Perspectives on Corporate Responsibility: Contractarian or Communitarian Thought?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Corporation; Duty; Corporate social responsibility; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Social responsibility; Sociology","score_opus":0.07770124567077645,"score_gpt":0.246520838045686,"score_spread":0.16881959237490957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1468194871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86005956,0.00034794435,0.00006444953,0.0012313988,0.0010531525,0.0002625861,0.000014670816,0.000037474645,0.13692874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99520785,0.000011200959,0.00037372546,0.0020482328,0.0010099451,0.0000023932269,0.000003409233,0.00003467208,0.0013085462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983114,0.000074244024,0.00057579787,0.0002568771,0.00029934416,0.00048235562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756926,0.00009833281,0.0008695468,0.00052906945,0.00072943047,0.0002043487],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009370597,0.00027310193,0.00040883225,0.00043353217,0.0007119327,0.0005545462,0.0008992482,0.000111739,0.0018845489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011330243,0.00020790963,0.00015479635,0.0003284394,0.0005032129,0.0019746644,0.00004147424,0.00062839495,0.00019845474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006619773,0.00008401534,0.0015800793,0.000021726595,0.00005056989,0.0023146737,0.0011908303,0.0000031874042,0.000040280764,0.9914948,0.002254239,0.00030364687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019530561,0.00057713775,0.03864332,0.0005872747,0.00024047116,0.0003419445,0.0033600726,0.00005425291,0.00026928665,0.23507838,0.71794003,0.0009547801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052365366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4949346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7564164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001686216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010451435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99902785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500911828","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005610","title":"Uncommonly Common: The Nature of Common Law Judgment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Law; Common law; Politics; Common ground; Common sense; Epistemology; Political science; Function (biology); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01189168377211633,"score_gpt":0.2794320054758199,"score_spread":0.26754032170370357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500911828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35186177,0.020932062,0.000013009011,0.044985548,0.002435456,0.0004021383,0.00009535808,0.00002463036,0.57925004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994993,0.0001329501,0.00012780112,0.0032867172,0.0006469087,0.0000017931312,0.0000023101798,0.0000104334695,0.00079814007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807423,0.00027551522,0.00047203078,0.00011788699,0.0006317459,0.00042858883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842507,0.00018064116,0.00041339334,0.00027168365,0.00032289053,0.0003863365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011041856,0.00014063115,0.0003008054,0.000013152264,0.0012567443,0.0001530876,0.0011703018,0.00030491193,0.00017405693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025770007,0.00009943062,0.0002446384,0.00030311558,0.0017117559,0.00030631656,0.000023608343,0.00090349774,0.000007350388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006117159,0.000029865721,0.003427071,0.0000105157815,0.000028571323,0.00007220577,0.005225766,0.00006504669,0.000039979015,0.95000774,0.040873434,0.00021367082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001976643,0.00006272577,0.0024953305,0.00014569044,0.000050269577,0.000036788355,0.002706888,0.0000014240871,0.0005576797,0.04607606,0.94751865,0.00015084706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19490916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8669667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9066452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002596553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009217984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9665988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504951138","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003647","title":"International Law’s Literature of Terror","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Character (mathematics); Terrorism; Comparative law; Municipal law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Narrative; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026945391549956465,"score_gpt":0.2984259763243727,"score_spread":0.2714805847744162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504951138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52148277,0.008201383,0.00034275258,0.031889543,0.009867239,0.0003228497,0.00030371512,0.000041093,0.42754865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99599934,0.00025292777,0.00010540829,0.0015311436,0.0008848016,0.0000013982502,0.0000012116332,0.000011357041,0.0012124176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818915,0.00013586789,0.00050186866,0.00015365501,0.0005417093,0.00047775317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980527,0.000089573725,0.00027936324,0.00018865748,0.00051499286,0.0008747105],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048251558,0.00013813273,0.00024982242,0.00015552556,0.0002713598,0.00017029958,0.0009909654,0.00015885546,0.0014957114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001777394,0.00012903487,0.00017081448,0.00020765519,0.00082088757,0.0007223799,0.00001656882,0.00037904122,0.00003958921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004142257,0.00016174352,0.007148806,0.00007958367,0.00016559429,0.0015610054,0.4164232,0.000014347762,0.00042974195,0.5395148,0.022671467,0.011788336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004911903,0.00022850874,0.0015234923,0.001158902,0.000050472445,0.0001750282,0.016557366,0.000042819855,0.00034226556,0.0055018226,0.97354555,0.0003825973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020357052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07956915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9508741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021451614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003639184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583254963","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005087","title":"In Defence of Two-Step Balancing and Proportionality in Rights Adjudication","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Prima facie; Law and economics; Criticism; Defeasible estate; Political science; Presumption of innocence; Human rights; Argumentation theory; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.058684851544119336,"score_gpt":0.3331830744211103,"score_spread":0.27449822287699094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583254963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94802344,0.00043428128,0.000090805945,0.0020478196,0.00017335007,0.0000913151,0.0000058029223,0.0000018568854,0.049131315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899864,0.000021909085,0.0006159993,0.00027213522,0.00007365992,9.4311883e-7,1.3935356e-7,0.000002039772,0.000014543277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891025,0.00017018196,0.00037003806,0.0000868858,0.00022511733,0.00023751629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991164,0.000107269116,0.00017396295,0.00007027731,0.00015228652,0.0003798086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015549819,0.000050685172,0.00014044378,0.000108715285,0.000118287586,0.000012478032,0.00020297206,0.00008301523,0.00006388391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003249245,0.000048771188,0.000025785164,0.00018524799,0.0007732329,0.0004126243,0.000006841548,0.00028430147,0.0000019118995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056746853,0.000013512576,0.043626547,0.000011294982,0.0000020072548,0.000056076435,0.0070247655,0.0000018518812,0.00002751083,0.9491563,0.000012119017,0.00006238124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023837721,0.000046611767,0.13488513,0.00028090048,0.00000803157,0.000016647748,0.00030612678,0.000009274965,0.00035087732,0.86122656,0.002530622,0.00010082023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34762016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7026491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.355029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001590512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011828343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6567241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1697724127","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000412","title":"The Ethics of Secession and a Normative Theory of Nationalism","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Nationalism; Normative; Autonomy; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Politics; Self-determination; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.02527542351283672,"score_gpt":0.32579539347302344,"score_spread":0.3005199699601867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1697724127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34223905,0.0063307732,0.00039024747,0.018635493,0.0004623996,0.0001578245,0.00014160042,0.0000041657277,0.63163847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980636,0.00047509666,0.00017527265,0.0005236832,0.00008313092,3.6339935e-7,3.0590616e-7,0.0000020220307,0.0006764941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988886,0.00033990492,0.00025999395,0.00004004204,0.00032718136,0.00014426638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978975,0.0011239678,0.00023021348,0.000057604146,0.00044441537,0.00024627533],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015874355,0.000045249366,0.000109088636,0.00003443427,0.00062066753,0.000024279381,0.00024072903,0.00006056317,0.00021236534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044991245,0.000032826476,0.0000413656,0.00010900892,0.00327598,0.00017443336,0.0000046904333,0.00022798526,0.0000013354266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008567649,0.0000029224186,0.00032894153,0.0000050797103,0.000011123407,0.0000046142773,0.007891335,0.000013471634,0.000008532381,0.9898041,0.00015892817,0.0017623658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013504448,0.000068347974,0.0024753343,0.00021985536,0.000026344365,0.000032703632,0.0038817858,0.0000033641923,0.00017040786,0.08938804,0.9035121,0.00008663058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023357993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051207207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9033532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005649096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058203586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W172127440","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003684","title":"Theoretical Underpinning of Intellectual Property: “I am a Pragmatist But Theory is my Rhetoric”","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Underpinning; Intellectual property; Scholarship; Pragmatism; Rhetoric; Sociology; Politics; Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.02244247931331175,"score_gpt":0.22930626369969567,"score_spread":0.20686378438638392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W172127440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09732726,0.0031498126,0.008188754,0.0018678227,0.0017895274,0.00046577255,0.000009341363,0.00003884597,0.88716286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99547184,0.000032253767,0.0002993352,0.0026944655,0.0004239644,0.0000026937041,9.926853e-7,0.000037135724,0.0010373133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807084,0.00008488291,0.0007122406,0.00023807024,0.0003949635,0.00049902895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813014,0.0002723807,0.000408916,0.00028067257,0.0007529315,0.00015497123],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012207987,0.00025469874,0.00042845344,0.00034836083,0.00032393896,0.00034180752,0.0006326044,0.000119276265,0.016857743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002212147,0.00016337127,0.00018817783,0.00049852877,0.00085595425,0.0009999708,0.00004572542,0.00046852478,0.00019613789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008280549,0.00004020732,0.00023921205,0.000105095954,0.00007546395,0.00010883012,0.0013526308,0.000004591752,0.000355771,0.95453507,0.04034467,0.0027556461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084328785,0.0002806799,0.00012088383,0.00094304804,0.0002232121,0.0004094757,0.0012286134,0.0019001826,0.007840335,0.173851,0.8116129,0.0007464008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032142934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002152763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8981446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013000685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007896083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.984041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1774663677","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005622","title":"Comparative History and the Internal View of French, German, and English Private Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"German; Law; Politics; Dialectic; Political science; Dualism; Legal science; Legal history; German idealism; Sociology; Epistemology; Hegelianism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020968831279057194,"score_gpt":0.28548350600428607,"score_spread":0.2645146747252289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1774663677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71792716,0.021493906,0.00014799727,0.0034938024,0.00044414873,0.00028656644,0.000025022384,0.0000072348284,0.25617418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99870515,0.00018498716,0.00015839837,0.0003488985,0.000223176,0.0000017125344,2.7207685e-7,0.0000031627735,0.000374268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921393,0.000112046524,0.0002731838,0.00008037078,0.00016174681,0.00015872132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910116,0.00013227326,0.00024475387,0.00008914862,0.000203373,0.00022928826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005488342,0.000065632405,0.00019503504,0.000029473968,0.00027096784,0.000062428444,0.00028359602,0.000036303198,0.000054772896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029075058,0.00004891468,0.000043765776,0.00005959339,0.0020883433,0.00022333748,0.000018136394,0.00018063946,0.0000013557232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037739057,0.000005034299,0.00080971885,0.000006401623,0.00000982005,0.0000068107097,0.012432928,0.0000030111232,0.000027914983,0.98475426,0.0018118819,0.00012845219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026384098,0.000019485155,0.004909515,0.00007094802,0.00002248503,0.00001081153,0.00028558346,0.00000803886,0.000066437395,0.011800836,0.9824771,0.00006486388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23783188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4962216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98066527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013748487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043705569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7694587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1792010912","doi":"10.1017/s084182090000583x","title":"A Particle of Freedom: Natural Law Thought and the Kantian Theory of Transfer by Contract","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Natural law; Doctrine; Philosophy; Freedom of contract; Epistemology; Social contract; Normative; Contract theory; Obligation; Property (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Natural (archaeology); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.01669162336942738,"score_gpt":0.2765781785476249,"score_spread":0.25988655517819753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1792010912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94988054,0.017581189,0.00026995825,0.0084117,0.0003092147,0.00025497732,0.000078506266,0.0000042448128,0.023209646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992254,0.00012050362,0.00007656088,0.0003288036,0.00013661392,0.0000018461475,2.8821822e-7,0.000004932106,0.00010508043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897695,0.00020449281,0.0002917861,0.00005571935,0.00020297326,0.00026811002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989635,0.00029500813,0.00012649466,0.000113154594,0.00013434817,0.00036754116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014970254,0.000062618805,0.00018158887,0.000015294108,0.00030389268,0.00003986461,0.00031885126,0.00004614085,0.000080599566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000077825076,0.000042147785,0.000083793224,0.0001143755,0.001839633,0.00035504074,0.0000067816873,0.00017940452,0.0000012380929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023824095,0.000012347469,0.0013176356,0.0000049106925,0.00002289872,0.0000013989882,0.008992456,0.0000021129579,0.0007802143,0.98830336,0.00016441087,0.00037441737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028696493,0.00013796383,0.0126990145,0.00023515885,0.00034438734,0.000064691405,0.0070860875,0.000060700444,0.018986879,0.022663621,0.9344342,0.00041768825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06503135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1521988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96563977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028237986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029442128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9411947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1815499224","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004720","title":"Beguiled By Metaphors: The “Living Tree” and Originalist Constitutional Interpretation in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitution; Doctrine; Constitutional interpretation; Law; Constitutional law; Original intent; Political science; Supreme court; Original meaning; Constitutionalism; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Democracy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013431635003973036,"score_gpt":0.275409109206593,"score_spread":0.26197747420261996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1815499224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9446676,0.009249165,0.00009830814,0.026583225,0.0006878873,0.00024972984,0.000033706583,0.000005735082,0.018424664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985305,0.00014153431,0.000090158435,0.001061907,0.00009497716,0.0000015487187,5.360433e-7,0.0000018751244,0.00007695049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880946,0.00017938076,0.0002832596,0.0000999499,0.00033847996,0.0002894779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899024,0.00028201554,0.00016520818,0.00005345028,0.00017683007,0.00033223076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006162219,0.000092718445,0.00017516456,0.00003448897,0.00069264584,0.0001297916,0.00029153927,0.000036816204,0.000060175942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041054538,0.00006660179,0.000037575937,0.00016865377,0.00089914416,0.00035423576,0.0000069539237,0.00022931714,9.797567e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048786675,0.000038767717,0.16885212,0.00002192955,0.00017923539,0.000547202,0.11699458,0.00028299502,0.00035219136,0.6489944,0.04240579,0.021281991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067870936,0.00014938792,0.2755376,0.00088094437,0.00013077272,0.000110390196,0.037735373,0.00016232357,0.00012781126,0.003924782,0.6798829,0.0006790219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9905814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99958295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6450696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013884372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036117597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6407107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893559805","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004422","title":"The Cultural Limits of Legal Tolerance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Multiculturalism; Constitutionalism; Dialogic; Law; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Legal culture; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Political science; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.046076258290730955,"score_gpt":0.3158658241002884,"score_spread":0.26978956580955743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893559805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94155157,0.009114946,0.000006735119,0.010289093,0.0011855168,0.00015534005,0.000009310085,0.000009054365,0.037678443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597794,0.0013505913,0.00020484373,0.00026819302,0.0004795989,0.00000196323,1.6596823e-7,0.000006063181,0.001710637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982906,0.00016452876,0.0004244816,0.000105747094,0.00053930207,0.00047531244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980021,0.00022294896,0.00034900566,0.00011977186,0.00078910927,0.00051702367],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055826554,0.0001185142,0.00024984629,0.000026957934,0.002546123,0.00010228974,0.000742177,0.00007535453,0.000043505803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058147433,0.000075500524,0.00016597667,0.00022687708,0.002304679,0.00058019924,0.0000137055395,0.00030056955,0.000013084628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100204525,0.00006476587,0.052460987,0.000042930154,0.00031665547,0.0012030323,0.22236326,0.00026294458,0.0014344647,0.633433,0.08086981,0.007447979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022631277,0.000080221034,0.030424215,0.00010638245,0.000022284545,0.00009260758,0.0052828128,0.000002709732,0.0006736491,0.0002969824,0.9626186,0.00017324548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15072118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45247287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8817488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002798653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011231928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1908817484","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006123","title":"Reconstructing Fuller’s Argument Against Legal Positivism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Argument (complex analysis); Positivism; Legal positivism; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Legal formalism; Sociology; Legal realism; Law and economics; Political science; Legal profession; Black letter law; Comparative law; Private law","score_opus":0.021366735224586854,"score_gpt":0.2299388762014419,"score_spread":0.20857214097685506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1908817484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9434928,0.00032784793,0.00008696544,0.002911208,0.0015314319,0.00015654186,0.000011868881,0.000014771758,0.051466543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956316,0.000043386775,0.000577414,0.0028526292,0.00031316694,0.0000037805846,2.9124004e-7,0.000018651452,0.00055910856],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825245,0.00010767351,0.0005114765,0.00024570944,0.00031001194,0.00057266786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824077,0.00011175858,0.00031606335,0.00022431352,0.00014088964,0.00096617796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023714291,0.00017881811,0.00023467345,0.00016100958,0.000387695,0.00032401262,0.00061599887,0.00007017934,0.0005966714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025152697,0.00015771505,0.00013210053,0.00020146005,0.00032358177,0.0010014356,0.000025329487,0.0004350231,0.00023854939],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027418073,0.00010911466,0.010176683,0.000087284585,0.000064916596,0.008310937,0.0027583016,0.0003588943,0.6882389,0.16772944,0.021425758,0.10071231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002247565,0.00106439,0.009135169,0.0018738417,0.00009261424,0.0136097185,0.00092694385,0.0011511914,0.5505439,0.017776465,0.3993738,0.0022043963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007697725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00427142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37794805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001715167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071390177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924136381","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004860","title":"Proportionality, Balancing, and the Cult of Constitutional Rights Scholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Cult; Scholarship; Vocabulary; Politics; Constitutional law; Law; German; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.019803944092618545,"score_gpt":0.29651002073596644,"score_spread":0.2767060766433479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924136381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78762305,0.0026645653,0.00015748563,0.015333455,0.0017871405,0.00026581503,0.000042925174,0.00000754745,0.192118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897164,0.00004727614,0.00018981677,0.0003313962,0.0003922432,0.0000018170381,4.114692e-7,0.0000013395038,0.00006406091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886143,0.000103714716,0.00031332576,0.000082888546,0.00044167793,0.00019697637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856144,0.00017519284,0.00024202498,0.00006822471,0.0006303749,0.0003227403],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016399829,0.00006950554,0.00017586883,0.000047277194,0.001344723,0.00006976238,0.0002971394,0.00006639138,0.00016343924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063388684,0.00004579992,0.00007619955,0.00012538837,0.01220771,0.00028551495,0.000015728303,0.00034454395,0.0000050008775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012106514,0.000006287857,0.023781303,0.0000024479634,0.000023547831,0.000021084476,0.0008168054,0.0000019754305,0.000043506585,0.9749591,0.00023129694,0.00010054828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006004231,0.000026798321,0.042809747,0.00011707616,0.00005474118,0.00014468496,0.00029595045,0.0000012347821,0.00014301573,0.58704424,0.36863244,0.00012967618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.088909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5227198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4338108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005024065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029713018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924618132","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004793","title":"A Postmodern Defence of Universal Liberal Legal Norms","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Universal law; Politics; Norm (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Contingency; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Postmodernism; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027088467439194876,"score_gpt":0.24047593244855997,"score_spread":0.2133874650093651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924618132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84086674,0.0003921372,0.000035499284,0.0035697373,0.004162974,0.000084952146,0.00012594914,0.000012024254,0.15074995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99656296,0.000010852086,0.00014572317,0.0007575989,0.0012664315,4.0837367e-7,0.0000018818714,0.000016820186,0.0012372965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988379,0.00003348218,0.00039699196,0.0001275394,0.0002816988,0.0003224046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983625,0.00005195056,0.00029090283,0.00021834795,0.00053721,0.0005390959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029053088,0.00014101759,0.00025856085,0.00015000252,0.00032113912,0.00019068783,0.00059610605,0.000096531505,0.00070620864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005509841,0.00012655469,0.00017493889,0.000036067246,0.0012214882,0.0007542114,0.000019352949,0.0007301448,0.000026049596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026459498,0.000018611165,0.00019411491,0.000024763318,0.000037626854,0.0002794765,0.022333352,0.000007310515,0.00080151664,0.97506255,0.0010127852,0.00020143183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008407093,0.000509797,0.0006607542,0.0002917998,0.00013179536,0.0005708414,0.00136194,0.000058499452,0.0011523896,0.092748225,0.9011369,0.0005363581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047810465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4805643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90012413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046100977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011644722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95853025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935216946","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006081","title":"Democracy and the Freedom of Speech: Rethinking the Conflict between Liberty and Equality","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Democracy; Value (mathematics); Constitutional law; Law and economics; Campaign finance; Law; Jurisdiction; Negative liberty; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.042061181807438126,"score_gpt":0.28640016838947147,"score_spread":0.24433898658203335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1935216946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9517428,0.0030742474,0.000696823,0.030982524,0.0006600062,0.0006514374,0.000015617443,0.000008817778,0.01216768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817574,0.0002115517,0.00017859308,0.00046698668,0.0005709001,0.0000016715709,1.7802975e-7,0.0000073100655,0.00038704768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802935,0.00063001853,0.00046373598,0.00013048394,0.0004177224,0.00032869584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974957,0.0010584339,0.00040268907,0.00023015143,0.000311542,0.0005014462],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003564783,0.000109728506,0.00031599935,0.000044961642,0.001309622,0.00031219816,0.00068207795,0.00009857246,0.0001177311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038465182,0.000058104342,0.00007778689,0.00015119385,0.018091545,0.00049092254,0.000035652476,0.00038153928,0.0000034032068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012523806,0.0000073133397,0.059046127,0.0000124757935,0.00008125718,0.000025930374,0.08914073,0.000001042397,0.000020013693,0.84598345,0.0010603805,0.0046087555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026695908,0.00031117137,0.08013261,0.0003290577,0.0003771786,0.00011399276,0.013786388,0.000054140553,0.00013740058,0.7157857,0.18579298,0.00050980865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25966915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23630713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1847326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052738742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063590764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W208799210","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004446","title":"Neither Here nor There: The (Non-) Impact of International Law on Judicial Reasoning in Canada and South Africa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Municipal law; Comparative law; International law; Political science; Public law; Tying; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.01650639266797427,"score_gpt":0.2685920604617675,"score_spread":0.2520856677937932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W208799210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92827845,0.00016030109,0.000007926035,0.0009389814,0.00032988016,0.00006325044,0.000033738317,0.0000010162645,0.07018648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99914515,0.00003331307,0.000031035277,0.0002804179,0.0002698151,9.64117e-7,6.390697e-7,0.0000061424407,0.00023254406],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998951,0.00008414071,0.00024973403,0.00008210177,0.0004235634,0.00020943358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991676,0.000111828,0.00024308046,0.0000656463,0.00021000924,0.00020183352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037685913,0.00007646168,0.00012792002,0.000055930137,0.00029751024,0.000040253268,0.00035434857,0.000040422692,0.00012555603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010715854,0.00005621949,0.00005906884,0.00010870471,0.0002737782,0.00019292335,0.000008123242,0.0002035994,0.0000018065198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008636827,0.000020489997,0.52930415,0.0000033603667,0.000087200555,0.00036362786,0.027764766,0.0008267809,0.00004796381,0.43974924,0.0012417948,0.00050422346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083891104,0.00024166559,0.9379661,0.00046633967,0.000023374114,0.00008875689,0.0039971294,0.00016462606,0.0001521956,0.0038539213,0.05190134,0.0003056554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99336153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43589532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000818294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005363481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9514585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131266742","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2015.17","title":"<i>The Coxford Lecture</i> Patriation and Patrimony: The Path to the Charter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Parliament; House of Commons; Charter; Law; Constitution; Opposition (politics); Political science; Polity; Supreme court; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Responsible government; Politics","score_opus":0.028279321259348667,"score_gpt":0.28991203106191815,"score_spread":0.2616327098025695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131266742","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4789158,0.021056449,0.00025307966,0.48675534,0.0036137227,0.001101012,0.000027788834,0.000020293992,0.008256503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954205,0.00042123112,0.000054540877,0.0029524416,0.0009269194,0.000007088039,2.0522906e-7,0.0000061296564,0.00021089891],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998451,0.00032583045,0.00025175075,0.000102659666,0.0004795348,0.00038924202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982606,0.00033088576,0.0001992181,0.00014187238,0.00045250563,0.00061488233],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021256702,0.00010479284,0.00013495525,0.00001692458,0.0026439507,0.0004372568,0.0006028859,0.00005892985,0.000009461016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009053837,0.000046179437,0.00006839431,0.00020888881,0.00056852587,0.0002166667,0.000028679291,0.00028221792,0.00001318284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010075131,0.000017875947,0.028612727,0.000014135502,0.00020072018,0.00010469028,0.5183167,0.0001328557,0.00007881254,0.08038308,0.29845145,0.07358618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013763404,0.000070957794,0.005868115,0.000024788089,0.000027782999,0.000010961692,0.007756939,0.0000039229526,0.000016073127,0.0014522579,0.9845428,0.00008780106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09549289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.675356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6860913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029017913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073535374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148520867","doi":"10.1017/s084182090000518x","title":"The Limits of Judicial Fidelity to Law: The Coxford Lecture","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Political science; Fidelity; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06233093076396494,"score_gpt":0.32410361598211973,"score_spread":0.2617726852181548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148520867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3447887,0.0028807009,0.0011914647,0.082360335,0.0017282659,0.0008973164,0.00008781908,0.000018901645,0.5660465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732286,0.00006718182,0.0001701207,0.0019586866,0.00032201243,0.0000037369712,1.2220606e-7,0.00000530212,0.00014999867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989003,0.000114851944,0.00030952817,0.000083520266,0.00028472877,0.0003070996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854857,0.00017008376,0.00021110829,0.00022504272,0.00036616047,0.00047905487],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010859581,0.0000688282,0.000119611665,0.000022305194,0.0014169327,0.00009932895,0.0010117206,0.000058491307,0.000091697155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000234353,0.000041526593,0.00009186203,0.0002250656,0.0007776904,0.00014677166,0.000018241302,0.0002533907,0.000013042658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009275633,0.000006586131,0.000443815,0.0000015014108,0.000012768151,0.0000069193093,0.010085604,0.000012273555,0.000057083507,0.98422515,0.0028647853,0.0022742506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000521895,0.00005635642,0.0050006504,0.000028851033,0.000019966188,0.0000064982137,0.00076346117,0.0000015558269,0.0006279239,0.028840901,0.96453285,0.00006877634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27112478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88251954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9616681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009827692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001401733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180453660","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005993","title":"A Duty to Make Restitution","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Duty; Mistake; Law and economics; Liability; Law; Payment; Common law; Business; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.027549752726063303,"score_gpt":0.3140123958049609,"score_spread":0.28646264307889757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180453660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61815953,0.0004695933,0.0020363415,0.073626675,0.0008983749,0.00059356313,0.000020149255,0.000024074761,0.30417168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957143,0.000016553675,0.0011540758,0.0015690413,0.0003504206,0.000007947865,2.538737e-7,0.000004518803,0.0011828953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914116,0.000049153423,0.00021143586,0.00008738316,0.00022041635,0.00029048306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834824,0.000036591846,0.00009469074,0.00013026735,0.00031056147,0.001079635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040017482,0.00005551771,0.00009196422,0.000069647416,0.00058227486,0.00021404675,0.0004183687,0.000051533276,0.0004350779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017122072,0.000052193333,0.00004999034,0.00022837787,0.00022881287,0.0003035589,0.000010498312,0.00014863357,0.0003443443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001416922,0.000007286762,0.0015104392,0.0000025763698,0.0000055859805,0.000026777074,0.0034796183,0.000055836066,0.00025965538,0.97985303,0.010886344,0.0039114193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005171528,0.000027190663,0.009775696,0.000039830862,0.000006050217,0.00001178403,0.00035441262,0.0000038117707,0.000078738296,0.0068719313,0.98269916,0.00007970438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31193638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.583548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9729811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023214132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015934462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6926455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182572518","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003611","title":"Truth and Method in the Domestic Application of International Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); International law; Reading (process); Law; Human rights; Landmark; Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Geography; Cartography; Linguistics","score_opus":0.018371524925188138,"score_gpt":0.33127824241922627,"score_spread":0.31290671749403814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182572518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.588122,0.0063402993,0.0061044213,0.03528935,0.0013533197,0.000540572,0.00006726219,0.000010823013,0.36217192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982901,0.00018709974,0.0008245284,0.00057985424,0.000084206215,0.0000010599575,4.0339978e-7,0.0000022444965,0.000030503516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991773,0.00014264116,0.0002147411,0.00006774097,0.00025007006,0.00014752113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993101,0.00019533593,0.00014100864,0.00007645646,0.00011646652,0.00016063933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094434095,0.00004656767,0.00010156286,0.00006160623,0.0001344822,0.00006360588,0.00042596448,0.00004936092,0.000036212277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015425817,0.00003838086,0.000033767526,0.0001566794,0.00032429138,0.0002060306,0.000006153477,0.00015030144,0.0000024825154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020032367,0.0000117033,0.002531216,0.0000037009645,0.0000057333255,0.000032872198,0.010624266,0.000041205076,0.000011208829,0.98413897,0.00012559771,0.0024715122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010194809,0.0002126597,0.024450948,0.00023846564,0.0000833791,0.00037553924,0.013401905,0.004516708,0.00003064166,0.1766548,0.7786217,0.00039377055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0728532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46431455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8074842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085056774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001285088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93332076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197172152","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006299","title":"Contempt No More","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Emancipation; Colonialism; Orthodoxy; Appeal; Government (linguistics); Racism; Political science; Sociology; Harm; Oppression; Law; History; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011938983494093903,"score_gpt":0.252184209530825,"score_spread":0.2402452260367311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197172152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04720771,0.0028446687,0.00020497973,0.011922304,0.004895653,0.00016458225,0.000032007672,0.000022908507,0.93270516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844218,0.000087962,0.0001619077,0.0023569358,0.0010900056,9.971839e-7,5.0019514e-7,0.000011644165,0.011868248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876016,0.00013432784,0.00027239256,0.000107549364,0.00033367172,0.00039191416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776465,0.000080261394,0.00017728086,0.00015578582,0.00040533915,0.0014167011],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008988,0.00007570993,0.00018768513,0.0003335069,0.0011630827,0.000451811,0.0005611584,0.00009810664,0.0013353806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005076694,0.000094635034,0.00011711754,0.00017217621,0.0012947416,0.0004153824,0.0000060005673,0.0002542775,0.00034066231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011837715,0.00001332584,0.0017642293,0.000022867458,0.00003352253,0.0003824535,0.018788394,0.000013888065,0.00007093535,0.7052699,0.2672102,0.0064184805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012710202,0.000041620755,0.0010308601,0.00006591457,0.000013570374,0.000019284453,0.0003180702,0.0000025537893,0.0000059079202,0.0010331967,0.99723,0.00011192419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89835566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9372141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088770315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051547447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202214160","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005476","title":"Private Property and Tax Policy in a Libertarian World: A Critical Review","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tax policy; Law and economics; Economics; Tax reform; Public economics","score_opus":0.07894097353695297,"score_gpt":0.31361371317780035,"score_spread":0.2346727396408474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202214160","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000012177268,0.96742404,0.000008098892,0.0063492367,0.00023066389,0.00026992956,0.00016234847,0.0000026407624,0.025551856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00038571435,0.9957266,0.0002637347,0.0018327571,0.00048235068,0.00002345525,0.0000024212814,0.00002133864,0.0012616669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976228,0.000050753566,0.0014808207,0.0003198356,0.00006389714,0.0004619277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984721,0.00010739011,0.0005752653,0.00020517936,0.00006659555,0.000573469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006535264,0.00030643758,0.0018721893,0.00067380874,0.00016418115,0.00013042423,0.00048285056,0.00013185643,0.0001921497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006432474,0.00023084303,0.00030824612,0.0006221538,0.00045821068,0.00035477942,0.00005116874,0.0006867076,0.00012757166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013801849,0.00001615161,0.0001472145,0.0059689325,0.00006495058,0.00027229395,0.00005059967,2.2291415e-7,2.504889e-9,0.8455943,0.00196801,0.14591594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089927766,0.000028367056,0.00006280923,0.03456197,0.00006531194,0.000371322,9.025483e-7,5.235762e-7,1.1222279e-8,0.0047199796,0.9598202,0.00027867037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024519902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09405098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9578522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058737415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017683551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9819759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2205513482","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005932","title":"The Coxford Lecture: Judging The Judges: “May They Boldly Go Where Ivan Rand Went Before”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Globalization; Constitutional law; Constitution; Common law; Rule of law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.013849219066436026,"score_gpt":0.2602579865963203,"score_spread":0.2464087675298843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2205513482","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34664428,0.046162114,0.00034120644,0.3476518,0.0051779,0.0012599424,0.000028941076,0.000043821205,0.25269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99574816,0.0010203437,0.000029463954,0.0018272472,0.00089756603,0.000011026037,2.539268e-7,0.000008302875,0.00045760773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814,0.00021076069,0.00036325748,0.00013479793,0.0005440079,0.0006071749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982937,0.00032815686,0.00025130794,0.0001750679,0.00044878563,0.00050295604],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011493556,0.00014980437,0.00020824878,0.000040341685,0.004786196,0.0005243692,0.0009582614,0.00007692991,0.000222904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003308903,0.00008079167,0.0001615077,0.0001958,0.0018580771,0.00036666612,0.00003255079,0.0004063003,0.000074770185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001823951,0.000013818494,0.024208698,0.000006291456,0.00016859263,0.00007096858,0.021615954,0.000110368375,0.00001987818,0.89934033,0.032172564,0.022254296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017749966,0.000058068388,0.011705341,0.00010204728,0.000041846324,0.00002982401,0.0039421204,0.0000046807863,0.000010338238,0.07804232,0.9057463,0.00013963525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25581235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91285855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8735737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028833418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019418785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99650943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213372811","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002435","title":"A Classical Perspective on the Modern Workplace: The Aristotelian Conflict in Sexual Harassment Litigation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Plaintiff; Injustice; Distributive justice; Harm; Damages; Economic Justice; Political science; Distributive property; Legislation; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06814509010138439,"score_gpt":0.3345266294557704,"score_spread":0.266381539354386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213372811","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27896297,0.0042981617,0.00051066093,0.5290147,0.0011866244,0.00077743107,0.00002308488,0.000026494143,0.1851999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946342,0.00009626943,0.000028288378,0.0024715534,0.00035957762,0.0000076276883,2.1143876e-7,0.0000071327886,0.002395144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984244,0.0003551184,0.0002721864,0.00013841384,0.00048345226,0.00032639183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864227,0.00047582143,0.00017524348,0.0001366316,0.00030348956,0.0002665267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009418222,0.000106242354,0.00015203607,0.000087156455,0.0009936251,0.00019858342,0.0004162042,0.000077557284,0.00024671337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043146647,0.00006616889,0.00005191022,0.0003589629,0.0007357329,0.00018869819,0.000010342321,0.00047247575,0.000030226374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031990596,0.000078113066,0.0060324864,0.0000033253061,0.000083819374,0.0001072974,0.34797096,0.001102739,0.000017803897,0.5794636,0.061246667,0.0038611707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007519948,0.00040601124,0.014393544,0.0002107033,0.000056195866,0.000025683457,0.16566359,0.0027838727,0.00003985897,0.01690559,0.79834586,0.00041706223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034193613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35407722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73709923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007267021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004511502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97223777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218074896","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003957","title":"Justice and Responsibility","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Economic Justice; Moral responsibility; Power (physics); Law and economics; Distributive justice; Collective responsibility; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04853700383529322,"score_gpt":0.2920217010822336,"score_spread":0.24348469724694036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218074896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98749626,0.0008851229,0.00019175536,0.0029609436,0.00067050935,0.00007099731,0.0000155475,0.000008288009,0.007700591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972677,0.00007170664,0.00048146842,0.0019072588,0.00013244057,5.114286e-7,5.6934812e-8,0.000008109938,0.00013070904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893796,0.00007793943,0.00028466055,0.00019159849,0.0002035081,0.00030433014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870175,0.00013462912,0.0001298629,0.00019300429,0.000085384614,0.00075538433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036748344,0.000101941325,0.00014756483,0.00009640291,0.00028736616,0.00008686507,0.00034833277,0.00005194489,0.000065112086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010069938,0.0000882436,0.0000508806,0.00018492702,0.00044289892,0.00039048097,0.000016600141,0.00026698934,0.000025792586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013816882,0.000079203935,0.0026006198,0.00015742124,0.000011706272,0.008046963,0.0032142762,0.0004434846,0.18086942,0.7981821,0.0011201293,0.005136535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00405314,0.0019172081,0.08318162,0.0012043486,0.0003818596,0.01364678,0.00049658,0.000057402423,0.38581118,0.25960752,0.24808371,0.0015586285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003654085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024085108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5385745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112143374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010260246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2233137974","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000400","title":"Federalism and Secession: At Home and Abroad","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Federalism; Autonomy; Legitimacy; Indigenous; Democracy; Political science; Diversity (politics); Self-determination; Government (linguistics); Mobilization; Territorial integrity; Political economy; Democratic legitimacy; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Sovereignty; Politics","score_opus":0.012528488669966234,"score_gpt":0.28717934323506317,"score_spread":0.2746508545650969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2233137974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9290027,0.0051066405,0.000002370544,0.00487662,0.00022410568,0.000049464663,0.000014837566,0.000003877158,0.06071937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99046195,0.00062491745,0.00004785557,0.0010064916,0.00033523995,6.2165094e-7,1.1344288e-7,0.0000051939205,0.007517617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898386,0.00008459386,0.00021337034,0.00011167471,0.00024225756,0.0003642563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998495,0.00006534463,0.0000931743,0.00007065003,0.00006162788,0.001214204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038474044,0.00007768603,0.00016859313,0.000025399953,0.0007392563,0.00017522549,0.0001715954,0.00008112046,0.00082496635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048194488,0.000066888686,0.00003284873,0.0000705803,0.0005404078,0.00032648174,0.000009125104,0.00013393714,0.000016545582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034293345,0.000015538111,0.06929683,0.000053653795,0.00003601628,0.001005856,0.018218007,0.0000037332452,0.000107707,0.8664687,0.01988696,0.024872651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016804608,0.000035451085,0.050618272,0.00014809832,0.000007087574,0.00011462399,0.000095911426,0.0000017547903,0.000017139295,0.0037573325,0.94492656,0.000109718625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30102205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4822268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9250396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016210027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043950963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90328026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252680423","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004173","title":"Dignity and Membership, Equality and Egalitarianism: Economic Rights and Section 15","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Egalitarianism; Rhetorical question; Law and economics; Appeal; Equity (law); Political science; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02709716758799447,"score_gpt":0.2927739755742289,"score_spread":0.26567680798623444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252680423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97418594,0.0020604415,0.0000069912617,0.002495426,0.00038826506,0.00010907002,0.000014931268,0.000007693145,0.020731246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99870145,0.00010040701,0.00017874411,0.00010958055,0.0005092552,0.0000011687689,4.8193067e-7,0.0000043243963,0.0003945673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891895,0.00019793713,0.0002736672,0.00016176235,0.00015310329,0.00029460902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990088,0.0001398773,0.00017692104,0.00005648113,0.00010643209,0.00051153026],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008624589,0.0001139557,0.00021779221,0.00003963353,0.0013176182,0.000261925,0.00011065556,0.000105839674,0.00007355276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006952031,0.000097912416,0.000036943788,0.000050589857,0.0009792509,0.0006108612,0.000017693137,0.000200045,0.0000024234016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003496606,0.000023855397,0.10702321,0.000068899055,0.00012610485,0.0001308971,0.051484507,0.00002017266,0.00019518187,0.8338049,0.005953094,0.0011341895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010561672,0.0001927983,0.41575792,0.0001805035,0.0001664696,0.00016359387,0.007934124,0.000016641623,0.00029977618,0.09703675,0.47647366,0.0007215985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7453687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9366359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7367682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036696368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025866152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256181194","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000382","title":"From Québec Veto to Québec Secession: The Evolution of the Supreme Court of Canada on Québec-Canada Disputes","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Supreme court; Secession; Political science; Law; Constitution; Framing (construction); Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.00826898085500558,"score_gpt":0.23014013408755704,"score_spread":0.22187115323255147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256181194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9041226,0.0020858361,0.0000085941465,0.077353954,0.0007959962,0.00017047756,0.0002738329,0.0000021835347,0.015186516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99491394,0.000011017741,0.000007669747,0.002058701,0.00040136368,0.0000022338759,1.6455286e-7,0.000008445354,0.0025964507],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976584,0.00022751151,0.0005260964,0.00014345245,0.0009902385,0.00045435387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782914,0.00046162697,0.00035597148,0.00032033163,0.00025035167,0.00078256475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043750356,0.00012983763,0.00028453468,0.00002008176,0.00060497376,0.00003304831,0.0011398183,0.00006052073,0.00064976426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048214445,0.000081239385,0.00009664165,0.0002440146,0.00046387405,0.00012597755,0.000016845775,0.00024943432,0.0000026330492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017014182,0.00008506421,0.1614261,0.00007250203,0.00023863926,0.00020778431,0.027995732,0.0023454113,0.00040296224,0.20162457,0.5974715,0.00795964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010133898,0.000045294928,0.10259697,0.00038815947,0.000020180112,0.00000428177,0.0010362194,0.000008294965,0.00019913091,0.0003160206,0.89517325,0.00011086474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99999976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29770178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046292846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10315573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256463645","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006603","title":"A Rights-Based View of the Idea/ Expression Dichotomy in Copyright Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Public domain; Opposition (politics); Expression (computer science); Law; Relation (database); Law and economics; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Copyright law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Intellectual property; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.018813544979896936,"score_gpt":0.22587024949248558,"score_spread":0.20705670451258865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256463645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31630284,0.006019906,0.0003703033,0.0019462567,0.0022017641,0.0007038809,0.0000072321295,0.000020088273,0.6724277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968683,0.000011210042,0.00009431762,0.0026764465,0.00016489945,0.0000033461736,5.657613e-7,0.000015426574,0.00016548681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985182,0.00006119779,0.00058436283,0.00016304529,0.0003318099,0.00034137882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879396,0.000074106465,0.000400728,0.00029646832,0.00035020718,0.0000845423],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004975578,0.00017796544,0.00031111838,0.00020015634,0.00028996335,0.00017284641,0.0006776481,0.00008290929,0.0028515924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016391657,0.00010343186,0.00017016684,0.000511253,0.00031962665,0.0009090703,0.0000236966,0.00034947167,0.000046075653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021779684,0.00027381143,0.013261124,0.0005722258,0.00007243503,0.00058570335,0.00080941076,0.00020908909,0.0090505015,0.83175415,0.14177424,0.0014195215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062209775,0.000028835859,0.0007571223,0.0011583428,0.000027099013,0.00002008287,0.000021830425,0.0003465414,0.015740594,0.018770367,0.96229666,0.00021040862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032021057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13467765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8205224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009755545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041800295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256615650","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006615","title":"Existence and Justification Conditions of Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Morality; Legal positivism; Law; Value (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Legal realism; Philosophy; Legal profession; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.04854953337624345,"score_gpt":0.23808984571901748,"score_spread":0.18954031234277402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256615650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4059886,0.030678524,0.0012156824,0.0024943487,0.0010499682,0.00016248866,0.00041650012,0.000006365781,0.5579875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872285,0.000167088,0.00059384824,0.00030264264,0.000032160417,0.0000018688298,9.685227e-7,0.000003436119,0.00017514973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930835,0.00001063261,0.00040804513,0.00010337248,0.000033024175,0.00013658515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992689,0.00003715535,0.00029138883,0.000091709895,0.00011989868,0.00019097331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002544901,0.00006511605,0.0001955158,0.00007857591,0.00021257039,0.000036587742,0.000120899866,0.000037109912,0.00012063772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009884814,0.00006908323,0.000050862753,0.00008804885,0.00052657386,0.00025752097,0.000005017724,0.00009882342,0.000024971148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012763152,0.0000073246974,0.005622116,0.000011445549,0.000018324336,0.00001085788,0.0001922154,0.00000879747,0.000022274922,0.99391776,0.000158119,0.00002949988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003472627,0.00009327324,0.025427917,0.00010654745,0.000023883771,0.00019873407,0.00013092396,0.0000104683695,0.00069641595,0.40854564,0.56420624,0.00021267135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076826573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009851957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5927342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006274243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017755073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256869429","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004215","title":"Property, Corrective Justice, and the Nature of the Cause of Action in Unjust Enrichment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Action (physics); Restitution; Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.026146688250142158,"score_gpt":0.3315620764756276,"score_spread":0.3054153882254854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256869429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9412923,0.0019262796,0.00012340052,0.010754473,0.00081293116,0.0005193502,0.00001306743,0.0000022179997,0.04455599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991907,0.00016834657,0.00003924805,0.00025002784,0.000094711664,0.0000013989109,6.1894006e-8,0.0000026436594,0.00025284712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992276,0.000098026074,0.00024432127,0.00006031109,0.00022004958,0.00014971798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991018,0.00017798664,0.00026741668,0.00010305665,0.00021277236,0.00013693876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012167887,0.00004659828,0.00011078654,0.00004552472,0.0002719137,0.000023121096,0.00031034715,0.0000697086,0.000012263586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002175872,0.000023675866,0.00004168497,0.0002863098,0.0007256995,0.0001447255,0.000015523574,0.00034480818,3.7439028e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094113384,0.000044628363,0.02175902,0.00004676932,0.000038406106,0.00001933302,0.034594998,0.00011584807,0.00046512103,0.9370384,0.00087013806,0.0049132067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00239437,0.00021096718,0.49307895,0.00083972415,0.0005229399,0.00010846466,0.04613284,0.00007717386,0.0070476523,0.014849477,0.4343535,0.0003839476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09380454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65320146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92218894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015713078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008516856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9122299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258055179","doi":"10.1017/s084182090000237x","title":"Should Any Court Accept the “Social Authority” Paradigm?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Resolution (logic); Law; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Computer security","score_opus":0.1076789380825444,"score_gpt":0.4200297274548881,"score_spread":0.3123507893723437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258055179","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040056188,0.0006027488,0.00033816058,0.7140983,0.0029246712,0.00017823123,0.000011503687,0.000016864124,0.24177335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898931,0.000098927456,0.00013139719,0.0058634924,0.0016572702,0.0000029940588,7.603317e-7,0.0000085621095,0.0023435454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998388,0.00029105475,0.00035371838,0.000101022306,0.00045738247,0.00040881758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983046,0.00024415588,0.00031301277,0.00014162928,0.00045919864,0.00053741876],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001876329,0.00009103568,0.00013800053,0.000106560576,0.0023788605,0.00062601804,0.000733842,0.00011307494,0.001848067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082136807,0.00007427269,0.00008854922,0.00069850247,0.00064290577,0.001130051,0.0000082712795,0.000752394,0.000069172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067839865,0.000020249767,0.0031934185,0.0000017808699,0.00002282808,0.00007153418,0.029404921,0.000005832423,0.000007320285,0.8781106,0.086687244,0.0024675217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008276517,0.000019986344,0.007639349,0.000014849204,0.000028939756,0.00006254151,0.004783498,0.0000028737288,0.000006750944,0.0068534636,0.98040974,0.00009521783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.103312194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33583596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94983685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031197834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006491252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258189201","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004872","title":"What can Kant Teach Us about Legal Classification?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Focus (optics); Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.025079288045823062,"score_gpt":0.32102443089366073,"score_spread":0.2959451428478377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258189201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86949235,0.0006997039,0.000111904454,0.04314483,0.0031137357,0.00025467275,0.000034808258,0.000022530188,0.083125465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955074,0.00015930725,0.00043511394,0.0010902799,0.00088964053,0.000006097344,0.0000015969364,0.000011578809,0.0018989404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985998,0.00007560681,0.00036160825,0.00016261461,0.00036822556,0.0004320913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978225,0.000072659524,0.00026134102,0.00027734018,0.00038953644,0.0011766254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008498313,0.0001038519,0.00015664837,0.000091863694,0.0010741397,0.0008371584,0.00085164397,0.00012573543,0.00034540365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015931188,0.00009850249,0.000099780904,0.00023403305,0.0006857033,0.00097954,0.000013117777,0.00065453193,0.000048725848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019125675,0.0000163031,0.005044144,0.0000030235235,0.000010969942,0.000046807232,0.004409056,0.0000058305395,0.0010758796,0.984397,0.0026904582,0.0022986254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093987255,0.000018855206,0.022786865,0.000040814906,0.000016986125,0.000041244115,0.0013855458,0.000011301732,0.00015735699,0.0017583487,0.97355616,0.00013250862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16182274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8746646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98263866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020017839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004002444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84375876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261418248","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003593","title":"Resituating the Judicialization of Politics: Bush v. Gore as a Global Trend","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Political science; Polity; Presidency; Supreme court; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.03707364720469677,"score_gpt":0.3043663065438004,"score_spread":0.2672926593391037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261418248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20649742,0.0120174475,0.00024619984,0.022188064,0.0012400046,0.00019855348,0.000070795526,0.00001328512,0.75752825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99826974,0.00022267214,0.000058380047,0.00071877264,0.00059531775,8.8173203e-7,3.3991194e-7,0.0000027910285,0.00013108044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987505,0.00012046236,0.00032849735,0.00007928154,0.000424931,0.0002962984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895096,0.00010223383,0.00026220366,0.000077106575,0.00031476474,0.00029276183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044590753,0.00007440985,0.0001608268,0.000042729305,0.001187978,0.00006334123,0.00036020335,0.000055778608,0.0002587677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000566013,0.000058997128,0.00008536254,0.00035178868,0.0013279865,0.00018878144,0.000012526623,0.000112268084,0.0000145495405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021887051,0.000007900737,0.0051685665,0.0000023029163,0.000025001274,0.000038623482,0.0056637186,0.000039685558,0.000004087497,0.98491526,0.0029822707,0.0011504134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050422736,0.0002546679,0.023159066,0.00061707763,0.00019967249,0.00012878253,0.013229917,0.000047654932,0.0000814852,0.41934162,0.54205143,0.00038441195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30376515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6226443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79177237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002536291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010117627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91370857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262938555","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004264","title":"The Religious Beliefs of Tort Victims: Religious Thin Skulls or Failures of Mitigation?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Argument (complex analysis); Tort; Religious freedom; Witness; Law; Accident (philosophy); Psychology; Forensic engineering; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine; Engineering; Philosophy; Liability; Epistemology","score_opus":0.015367179004416462,"score_gpt":0.3090928702814286,"score_spread":0.29372569127701215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262938555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93223953,0.024390036,0.00010142615,0.018414369,0.0019067413,0.0006787802,0.00005058075,0.000028080982,0.022190478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99554896,0.002503608,0.00084001804,0.00028385755,0.0003804776,0.000001981018,5.002294e-7,0.000011851036,0.0004287264],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974084,0.00016379385,0.00090714305,0.00014897835,0.0008166784,0.00055501354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964668,0.0008054242,0.0008418683,0.00020471273,0.0011079529,0.00057325023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021724456,0.00015901674,0.00036933986,0.00008024946,0.0010666292,0.00009043307,0.00085560256,0.00015082234,0.000039629827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013668943,0.0001031202,0.00019656202,0.00039612624,0.00173528,0.00028357314,0.000029027715,0.00031786138,0.0000085490465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044624787,0.00014979737,0.05514239,0.000205036,0.00097531365,0.0012070267,0.5580769,0.00037215665,0.0027357964,0.19569875,0.17586942,0.009121148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064574333,0.0004625564,0.021483187,0.0006629884,0.0001321798,0.00007496735,0.034436177,0.0000027154224,0.005229016,0.0047636083,0.93167704,0.00042984204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24033414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7338968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7558076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042773422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015327699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82037574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263605963","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004008","title":"Jurisprudence as a Moral and Historical Inquiry","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Archetype; Universality (dynamical systems); Jurisprudence; Realm; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Value theory; Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.044499790616415895,"score_gpt":0.3090017325874035,"score_spread":0.2645019419709876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263605963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6702102,0.04758516,0.00016285795,0.08778823,0.0047896253,0.000432192,0.000015872121,0.00007390056,0.18894197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889525,0.00081023015,0.0012305221,0.0029906873,0.0020267537,0.0000023449948,3.2771229e-7,0.000012603044,0.003974039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981886,0.00014991868,0.00037865387,0.00019767438,0.0005411511,0.0005440138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978038,0.00009206218,0.0002261506,0.00015634562,0.00030583993,0.001415777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087544543,0.00014993211,0.0002637354,0.00003065109,0.0009860782,0.00021038798,0.0006148123,0.0002372334,0.0003930648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025122968,0.00013903258,0.00014197428,0.0002551334,0.0010157198,0.0008490402,0.00001699167,0.00051086093,0.00005223501],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027529853,0.000053401953,0.0070309,0.000023201266,0.00005932911,0.0005690598,0.15705442,0.000037274996,0.00014611325,0.6900082,0.13541168,0.009578842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020047677,0.00008364002,0.00090675784,0.00008087639,0.000031154872,0.00014826408,0.00276662,0.0000025117952,0.0000655535,0.004874573,0.9906428,0.0001967607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03513938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17699276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8552311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011281339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002072662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9712857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264591406","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000424","title":"Toward a Proceduralist Theory of Secession","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Legitimacy; Clearance; Political science; Politics; Miller; Law; Privilege (computing); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.029725538297608434,"score_gpt":0.30195910412888305,"score_spread":0.2722335658312746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264591406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22385426,0.0017155746,0.00016202766,0.0039158254,0.0003944515,0.000103107,0.000051066436,0.00000831287,0.76979536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99594855,0.00010136603,0.00028336502,0.0009438028,0.00026407538,6.41991e-7,5.8193797e-7,0.00000462681,0.0024529765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989019,0.00014912222,0.0002917968,0.00007386643,0.00029674268,0.00028658597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987411,0.00011935096,0.00017406548,0.00008234652,0.0002605387,0.00062260765],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005810882,0.000071741095,0.00016728083,0.00005748569,0.00034158997,0.00003962321,0.00038637544,0.00006109366,0.0022982792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015323143,0.00006352852,0.00008461953,0.00016529525,0.0017542666,0.00026815612,0.000003895571,0.00015316544,0.00001734374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013064012,0.000007354886,0.0007455633,0.00000959571,0.000009765452,0.00006235539,0.0029594074,0.000015870048,0.000018182336,0.9927424,0.0010021972,0.0024142058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118748954,0.0000682943,0.00085689843,0.00019630798,0.000025130654,0.00007563974,0.0012293461,7.0654295e-7,0.0001628437,0.013856543,0.983292,0.000117529504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05320962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047259893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9822898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013676379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008568307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269871599","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000515","title":"The Social Character of Freedom of Expression","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Adjudication; Ideal (ethics); Political science; Politics; Constitutional right; Freedom of expression; Law; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; State (computer science); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Human rights; Constitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.024448892214476513,"score_gpt":0.2917098771888187,"score_spread":0.2672609849743422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269871599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8938738,0.0042569772,0.002315062,0.010283768,0.004695195,0.00038774378,0.00006265226,0.000015102824,0.0841097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976413,0.00033064806,0.000106281965,0.00009006076,0.00095999334,8.398931e-7,3.3844077e-7,0.0000076256597,0.0008628662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842995,0.00017154594,0.00046745047,0.000087022425,0.00048508876,0.00035896787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983406,0.000166655,0.0005315504,0.00014491648,0.00043468684,0.00038156498],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010064963,0.00008507231,0.00023568858,0.000066452834,0.0009178785,0.000063567306,0.0007670622,0.00011371208,0.00024177799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013222356,0.000058296442,0.00015768112,0.0001895323,0.008928969,0.00034429837,0.000013435907,0.00020011324,0.000005251024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004585506,0.000028379167,0.006720686,0.000010888108,0.000033765085,0.00009176857,0.02314164,0.0000064113274,0.002184171,0.95905775,0.006129056,0.0025496043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053392927,0.00014080375,0.006027742,0.00025305492,0.000047620535,0.000032010103,0.0032701588,0.0000051572442,0.0023207413,0.013905354,0.97325647,0.00020694906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015863527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11228226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96712744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000993272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012373239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99376816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271109635","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003908","title":"How the New ICTs Matter to the Theory of Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Legal positivism; Positivism; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Allegiance; Sociology; Legal profession; Law and economics; Legal realism","score_opus":0.019784844106262117,"score_gpt":0.26392726989390525,"score_spread":0.24414242578764314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271109635","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046415146,0.0065987417,0.0007824665,0.73780984,0.002160393,0.00051192136,0.00003159799,0.00001311079,0.20567681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761338,0.00007397764,0.00022806859,0.017796747,0.0007916602,0.0000014968066,1.625907e-7,0.00000830738,0.0049657356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987328,0.00018595716,0.00019954324,0.00009695258,0.00042323486,0.00036151154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866915,0.0001143752,0.00017945645,0.00023205136,0.00021256317,0.0005923808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011082626,0.000097305405,0.00014953618,0.000008147094,0.0009788112,0.00026732992,0.0011739057,0.00010023498,0.00027414094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109616514,0.00005337921,0.00016605922,0.00022785246,0.0009817062,0.00031383082,0.000019003963,0.00033527665,0.00004328115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004726576,0.000004505423,0.00010953364,0.0000032035184,0.00002427529,0.000019941961,0.05763131,0.00006833217,0.000045908426,0.9068454,0.03491993,0.00032295543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011823022,0.000036145684,0.0005046528,0.00009369156,0.00002927827,0.000023969495,0.007971582,3.7379273e-8,0.00041130456,0.07719335,0.9135341,0.000083658255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043356393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44261628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9297187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016404441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016207336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.963014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271604228","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003994","title":"Constitutions as Living Trees: An Idiot Defends","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Idiot; Law; Sociology; Tree of life (biology); Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.03350669052369158,"score_gpt":0.3190390909449404,"score_spread":0.2855324004212488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271604228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23732069,0.0069193966,0.00046018118,0.010890499,0.0013344412,0.00014026577,0.000028439872,0.000033733264,0.74287236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99653906,0.00023081459,0.00038050918,0.0012597678,0.001284186,0.0000019562522,3.7422507e-7,0.0000047077133,0.00029862666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862486,0.00013196366,0.00031627223,0.00012936133,0.00037129127,0.00042623383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998293,0.00013851549,0.00015043379,0.000102710495,0.00035856536,0.0009567894],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007559397,0.00010661583,0.00019041661,0.00012009627,0.0020414703,0.00015612961,0.000447084,0.00008039993,0.0005889043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004942342,0.00010393701,0.00010693775,0.00024174695,0.0019626122,0.00079581066,0.000013599641,0.00022636319,0.00010813531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029068783,0.000020701571,0.0039842296,9.3606815e-7,0.000025233603,0.000093402494,0.005511139,0.00014612445,0.000021111817,0.98640186,0.00095538504,0.0028369792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012192593,0.00010419419,0.005194677,0.0002128652,0.000051455812,0.00013437221,0.0037018938,0.000005415349,0.000029318511,0.013859871,0.9763597,0.0002242777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20227464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8837481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9754043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003860978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005254177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272219748","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002460","title":"Unconstitutionality, Invalidity, and Charter Challenges","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Morality; Positivism; Legal positivism; Law; Duty; Political science; Politics; Constitutionality; Sociology; Law and economics; Constitution; Legal realism; Legal profession","score_opus":0.11902694100008154,"score_gpt":0.3161608745964075,"score_spread":0.19713393359632597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272219748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39464176,0.08669379,0.000026731173,0.1736014,0.0026817664,0.00045260135,0.000060230777,0.000043305343,0.34179842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942785,0.0040321243,0.00015150443,0.00058696856,0.0005000618,0.0000017988226,2.1560662e-7,0.000004403778,0.00044445522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998747,0.0001550662,0.00024925414,0.00013011282,0.00036727844,0.00035127148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864525,0.0001259101,0.00014674786,0.000079843616,0.00028884757,0.0007133918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006450185,0.000106669955,0.00020270237,0.000049273727,0.0010180206,0.00014245154,0.00029925423,0.00008964889,0.0004955576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002995362,0.00009070475,0.000069669215,0.00008992768,0.0015210217,0.0005134839,0.000022732556,0.00021816368,0.000042643947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003010507,0.000026421634,0.011799196,0.00003194334,0.000081409446,0.00027977678,0.057541214,0.0000043298337,0.000025697978,0.90996647,0.013817773,0.006422782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002249458,0.00005132211,0.012657117,0.0001278539,0.000030251374,0.000069591995,0.003022873,0.000002945488,0.000024545197,0.0050211023,0.9785642,0.00020323295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053166896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45542774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9647465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002490607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026470164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9531382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279373688","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006305","title":"In Defence of Reconciliation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Indigenous; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Colonialism; Neocolonialism; Political economy; Doctrine; State (computer science); Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.016606420934997163,"score_gpt":0.2968984406756334,"score_spread":0.2802920197406363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279373688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8629183,0.00042506293,0.000116423005,0.0011189206,0.0013052116,0.000118840784,0.0000026268829,0.0000022942213,0.13399231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977884,0.00055899535,0.00036025292,0.00016318962,0.0003612515,2.2007588e-7,2.709123e-7,0.0000039865818,0.0007633941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987842,0.00023485326,0.00037990662,0.00007756806,0.00022704859,0.0002964144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870646,0.00013318178,0.00029946794,0.00009884884,0.0003595515,0.0004024991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019160527,0.000052678435,0.00014774455,0.00015370331,0.00085108593,0.000026187612,0.00030568487,0.000082824205,0.0001367627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005604342,0.000048443646,0.000040536117,0.0002212065,0.00027830707,0.00038449105,2.58958e-7,0.00014988992,0.000013135155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041753065,0.000014189846,0.007587257,0.000020051466,0.0000030905835,0.000008977659,0.18220297,0.00002214377,0.000008715739,0.8095175,0.00018925761,0.0004216755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013299816,0.00008341816,0.0064245635,0.00014491712,0.0000064086225,0.000010643245,0.0011847828,0.0000054764005,0.00032835256,0.0124726165,0.9791143,0.00009154772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73591554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99711424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.978925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034604387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02447341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9810569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283773878","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004070","title":"Introduction: Global Ethics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.045975997812491336,"score_gpt":0.3455845112431948,"score_spread":0.29960851343070344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283773878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017730668,0.0016529791,0.00052231713,0.36941695,0.0038364758,0.000086330954,0.00003427658,0.000022728012,0.60669726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98879033,0.000030649477,0.00036280823,0.00256584,0.007764634,3.97045e-7,6.614302e-7,0.000004756554,0.0004799002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983636,0.00024818184,0.00030882432,0.00011392848,0.0004957459,0.0004696813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982536,0.00017265389,0.00012751945,0.00012830678,0.00050290127,0.0008150275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016331831,0.00008314873,0.00014519447,0.000043900294,0.0008992385,0.00014759814,0.00042667284,0.00024793766,0.00030553367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008907455,0.000084021,0.00009380765,0.00025682084,0.0014269025,0.00037801228,0.000007739141,0.0007867943,0.000062926534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030982037,0.0000070643628,0.0005825569,0.000005042681,0.0000052331,0.000096107375,0.000886573,0.00002825209,0.0000035968123,0.98704046,0.011231367,0.000110639696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054593867,0.000024487143,0.0008747383,0.000022071203,0.000011551947,0.000038938997,0.0001417727,5.254628e-7,0.000022946648,0.4043162,0.59442014,0.00007204875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19608669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.515096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9710597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004965774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045237546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8092666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284029674","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004835","title":"Red Tape and Gridlock","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Veto; Object (grammar); Law and economics; Position (finance); Gridlock; Property (philosophy); Power (physics); State (computer science); Business; Original position; Block (permutation group theory); Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law; Politics; Finance; Computer science; Economic Justice; Epistemology","score_opus":0.012847200544364985,"score_gpt":0.27626811032121185,"score_spread":0.26342090977684685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284029674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.627433,0.00039626236,0.00004292243,0.019986005,0.001992025,0.000091613314,0.000010742222,0.000009863373,0.3500376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706817,0.000041910385,0.00042422226,0.0012958689,0.0005627173,6.3516313e-7,1.2254044e-7,0.000004573214,0.0006017949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918234,0.000048768125,0.00019835234,0.00008551667,0.000117083095,0.00036794582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820876,0.00010564986,0.00009080052,0.00009223264,0.000109511,0.0013930172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006398005,0.00006162115,0.00012859757,0.000059741295,0.00041965678,0.000121816825,0.0002896796,0.00010034466,0.00058107026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035794036,0.000060184404,0.000044567223,0.00006086299,0.00076933345,0.00035057144,0.000009067356,0.00035284253,0.0000148839235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002416591,0.0000037278337,0.0023594918,0.0000030017525,0.0000067806595,0.00009918049,0.0012536009,3.1173505e-7,0.00012886133,0.9913075,0.0022011392,0.0026339805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010672522,0.000029032451,0.00437816,0.000019538915,0.000009543481,0.000056669,0.00018344095,0.0000018568545,0.000117373944,0.031297598,0.9637129,0.00008716654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064491294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5860011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96151173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005310337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013788764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9417383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290919682","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006202","title":"Equality, Assurance and Criminalization","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Argument (complex analysis); Supreme court; Wrongdoing; Equal Protection Clause; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Harm; Jurisprudence; Criminal law; Duty; Due Process Clause; Criminal code; Sociology","score_opus":0.02882209826293836,"score_gpt":0.3114581393830779,"score_spread":0.28263604112013957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290919682","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34248713,0.011331908,0.007203131,0.037212197,0.0033608072,0.0003554645,0.000023289876,0.000049219776,0.59797686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963752,0.00032013896,0.00047893712,0.0015709546,0.0004284025,6.0040816e-7,3.8938106e-7,0.0000048986803,0.00082049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999002,0.00020953835,0.00019660473,0.00008813351,0.0002650008,0.00023876372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988764,0.00009946966,0.0001560099,0.00007996867,0.0002672817,0.0005208676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012169316,0.00006462497,0.00012720018,0.00001014331,0.0006689516,0.00016301143,0.00026472184,0.00010081456,0.0001146893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003307485,0.000059175803,0.00005280899,0.00012032011,0.0005585627,0.00037263418,0.000006516248,0.00015397978,0.000006937154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002415527,0.000004629463,0.0038158882,0.000020019117,0.000009616007,0.000010867924,0.022686243,0.0000129048285,0.000050679286,0.9651348,0.0065281126,0.0017238491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012635707,0.000040404357,0.003115144,0.000106855376,0.000022845308,0.000021125468,0.0016841538,0.000007284895,0.00007940597,0.021316387,0.9733661,0.00011392478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02305758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29560354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.966838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008411879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006119679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98344797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297086725","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004227","title":"The Authority of Law in the Circumstances of Politics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Politics; Norm (philosophy); Law; Political authority; Primary authority; Political science; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Public authority; Sociology; Legal research","score_opus":0.060085594575824575,"score_gpt":0.3610193666428287,"score_spread":0.3009337720670041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297086725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29634228,0.003900306,0.00014192505,0.036392108,0.0012175699,0.00020795314,0.000049496284,0.0000044334506,0.66174394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984315,0.00008160446,0.00006065606,0.001026298,0.0003576749,3.1562564e-7,1.0067623e-7,0.0000036148153,0.00003821464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997995,0.00031450743,0.0005332145,0.00006893312,0.0005671832,0.0005211407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972541,0.0015453544,0.00026118022,0.00017770773,0.00033741177,0.0004242612],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058742347,0.00007132512,0.00018063239,0.00005476442,0.0006137818,0.000050069888,0.0009416885,0.00012169344,0.00001417899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088763394,0.000047207817,0.00009911181,0.0002540947,0.0033634687,0.00019617302,0.000009165732,0.00052609586,0.0000013585517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048386883,0.000010805421,0.0011187827,0.000010805713,0.0000065553654,0.000041481097,0.011350995,0.000002402178,0.000012507308,0.9872248,0.00007542467,0.00014058137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010387621,0.00007826795,0.0061920127,0.00012786205,0.000018018383,0.000012839317,0.004826545,9.713723e-7,0.00037561284,0.86289835,0.125287,0.00007863726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15747163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6425369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70208925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015027395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017432624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336035430","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2015.28","title":"Functional and Existential Authorities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.14467859802726488,"score_gpt":0.3436608182073961,"score_spread":0.1989822201801312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336035430","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13670965,0.004583005,0.00047938377,0.055935476,0.005254528,0.000115606555,0.00003633592,0.000021999855,0.79686403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966561,0.000023484992,0.00020433994,0.00096603617,0.0012764013,4.1900302e-7,3.2973597e-7,0.0000040839204,0.00086877326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989799,0.000120997654,0.00018108592,0.00007162033,0.0003548011,0.00029159852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978281,0.000105700274,0.000066289555,0.000055882232,0.00033464713,0.0016093799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010350965,0.000058066144,0.000110391644,0.00006112332,0.00044409267,0.00013183306,0.00017264874,0.00010094394,0.00010618491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005460661,0.000056780766,0.00004448405,0.00007513273,0.0012223655,0.00038474594,0.000008798531,0.00027981654,0.000016616097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006872254,0.0000031942861,0.0004457069,0.00000346353,0.0000069240245,0.00007259065,0.003994192,0.0000030398203,0.0000026890546,0.99113303,0.0041673556,0.00016096003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019893798,0.00008277995,0.001313632,0.00004947558,0.000020400812,0.00007302096,0.0020102528,0.0000023194793,0.000021788946,0.5375239,0.45859677,0.00010667706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04282241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09528488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8599465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014971141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00295558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9635515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338217353","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002393","title":"Making Inclusive Positivism Compatible with Razian Authority","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Positivism; Legal positivism; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Morality; Order (exchange); Universal law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Economics","score_opus":0.03135342173081904,"score_gpt":0.3331496247278377,"score_spread":0.3017962029970187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338217353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39747682,0.0032567368,0.0010300017,0.028947433,0.00138947,0.00038925844,0.000029460436,0.000048105783,0.5674327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957611,0.00011499377,0.0010563899,0.0015889241,0.00057521777,0.0000013455872,8.0783394e-7,0.00001079239,0.0008904082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984237,0.00018393376,0.00024790547,0.00014179124,0.000495926,0.00050674495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983332,0.000072952746,0.00025489935,0.00013166839,0.00046309404,0.0007441743],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007656768,0.00012631441,0.00022350547,0.000024493562,0.0017868541,0.00023578899,0.0005647178,0.00014368168,0.00033515177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006662881,0.00010554067,0.00010373493,0.00039815402,0.0008045946,0.00059254194,0.000017021715,0.00045560123,0.000016065771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055375778,0.000050123064,0.03518748,0.000020891139,0.00012206522,0.0027716805,0.12936896,0.00013914681,0.000102408805,0.81705785,0.012325505,0.002798507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040482148,0.00017742033,0.006230347,0.00044741598,0.00006237622,0.00035619247,0.010735013,0.000007926805,0.000089419846,0.010752259,0.97041446,0.0003223714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040232703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5284485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95808893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045949992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024144305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W236800487","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004847","title":"Improperly Collected Taxes: The Border Between Private and Public Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Doctrine; Restitution; Law; Political science; Normative; Private law; Constitutional law; Public law; Legal doctrine; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02420793817266316,"score_gpt":0.3110538842295081,"score_spread":0.28684594605684494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W236800487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9109955,0.0003279344,0.00008066946,0.036564592,0.00031358504,0.00026766877,0.000054813398,0.000012449018,0.051382776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765694,0.000033380857,0.00033445988,0.00087015075,0.00048053375,0.0000051693382,6.87123e-7,0.00000935373,0.00060935295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988917,0.00008916563,0.00026193203,0.00011881585,0.0002525762,0.00038581731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983312,0.00013285727,0.00018212695,0.00019809602,0.0003255048,0.00083024317],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007822858,0.00008637186,0.0001386467,0.000047530793,0.0017498909,0.0005611135,0.0007075483,0.0000977275,0.00019617862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020749542,0.00006106019,0.00004982413,0.0003247937,0.0011981236,0.00041758682,0.000023405295,0.00052945834,0.000012375062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011597378,0.0000055409637,0.006848476,0.000002570669,0.000017515167,0.000010225602,0.0026763536,3.146908e-7,0.00038553379,0.98725355,0.0009830123,0.0018157328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010813779,0.000028998276,0.010743072,0.000011970851,0.000017960652,0.000013504528,0.0003832264,0.0000021253488,0.00008274273,0.005234806,0.9832803,0.00009317406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17765336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84802496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98229724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006547612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017544967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W238538938","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003623","title":"Gender Performance, Sexual Subjects and International Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; International law; Law; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.06056175362656408,"score_gpt":0.28911831281038336,"score_spread":0.22855655918381929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W238538938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6620362,0.0025189468,0.00001704323,0.0019820475,0.0012385516,0.00006881922,0.000008102286,0.000009223726,0.33212107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99533623,0.00040959264,0.000086757274,0.0012282712,0.0006215021,9.516625e-7,4.5674844e-7,0.000007978588,0.002308245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884266,0.00007393595,0.00023339131,0.00013299662,0.00034778437,0.00036922263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878144,0.000044280336,0.00012485564,0.00009687335,0.00022545413,0.000727097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047706685,0.0000988209,0.00013456227,0.00010194255,0.00058866333,0.00021844037,0.00044561923,0.00008732009,0.0008365944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049977356,0.00009968795,0.000042389882,0.000112140544,0.00056883454,0.0005549097,0.00001545348,0.00024382248,0.00003290845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016588217,0.000052584743,0.061990034,0.00003877047,0.00012606483,0.00041916256,0.1135571,0.000023022765,0.00009226119,0.800618,0.009017824,0.01404859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044214143,0.00012879225,0.013609416,0.00004600934,0.000031602627,0.00021755513,0.0045040343,0.00009505396,0.000063058214,0.0030501108,0.97752964,0.00028259662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023477087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23222566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9685118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012612759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004153384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98302567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461290031","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002496","title":"In Pursuit of Pragmatic Legal Theory","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Legal positivism; Epistemology; Tort; Positivism; Economic Justice; Principal (computer security); Sociology; Legal formalism; Legal realism; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Legal research; Comparative law; Black letter law; Computer science","score_opus":0.034640150205082126,"score_gpt":0.3431281907909138,"score_spread":0.3084880405858317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461290031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12767984,0.0019356959,0.00015915607,0.1521818,0.0022945532,0.00022939043,0.000012547295,0.000007093853,0.71549994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943264,0.0000527324,0.00035016582,0.0018329711,0.0001794965,0.0000014358048,1.7895876e-7,0.000004726918,0.0032519018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998732,0.0002794998,0.00039526712,0.000061388484,0.0003126405,0.0002192065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986208,0.00033704122,0.00032305002,0.00010730271,0.0003128274,0.0002989576],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020140174,0.00005425559,0.00012985573,0.00021780969,0.00019713673,0.00015063115,0.00044808706,0.00005803185,0.0039132684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015523019,0.000054194228,0.0000441168,0.00054241484,0.00035745205,0.0013962672,0.000004533395,0.0003584951,0.000041754047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026841456,0.000028913826,0.0007491819,0.0000069328275,0.000007674969,0.00004949523,0.019177092,0.000009278029,0.000036962247,0.96721786,0.011637562,0.0010763628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014145143,0.00003613895,0.0010583104,0.00008138612,0.0000123841455,0.000034711702,0.0030229585,0.000005315911,0.000066678054,0.0156170195,0.9798446,0.0000790059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07849257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30437174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96820706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001789521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022595834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475997088","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004525","title":"Uneasy Partners: Multiculturalism and Rights in Canada by Janice Gross Stein, David Robertson Cameron, John Ibbitson, Will Kymlicka, John Meisel, Haroon Siddiqui, and Michael Valpy, (Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2007); xiii + 165 pp. Paper ISBN: 1-55458-012-9, ISBN 13: 978-1-55458-012-5. Numbers in parentheses are page references to this work, except where indicated.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Multiculturalism; Politics; Economic Justice; Law; Supreme court; Sociology; Religious studies; Media studies; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01419317649905062,"score_gpt":0.21803967408488784,"score_spread":0.20384649758583723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475997088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96201915,0.019794827,8.0054775e-7,0.010753779,0.00077074044,0.0006126049,0.000542526,0.000021828802,0.005483762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980472,0.008889268,0.00004790998,0.0012227279,0.00021372146,0.000008427966,0.000017165194,0.000031815413,0.009096955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99576145,0.00060797454,0.0007664583,0.0007339457,0.00089983625,0.0012303437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99608624,0.00023907733,0.00058793765,0.00036109096,0.0003078435,0.0024177853],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059044006,0.00047689758,0.0007755398,0.00043246764,0.0016472992,0.00045453446,0.00095312565,0.00036207007,0.0009680744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016017443,0.00050814287,0.00010306377,0.0007571903,0.001578942,0.0018463958,0.00007303852,0.0009206195,0.000012242471],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028728633,0.00012671726,0.04277469,0.00010681159,0.00015031511,0.004151325,0.072732665,0.00013569128,0.00007484716,0.0015399922,0.8769276,0.0009920567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007812858,0.0001123099,0.02078096,0.00076436443,0.00006252586,0.00005617862,0.0059595443,0.0000032507353,0.000042136362,0.000029552159,0.97073865,0.00066925125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99879354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.093811035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038312427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004974741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476423704","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004471","title":"<i>Discussion</i>Foucault, Agamben, and Arbour J.’s Dissent in<i>Gosselin</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Charter; Law; Supreme court; Political science; State (computer science); Human rights; Legislation; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.028910219776783187,"score_gpt":0.2999339519642602,"score_spread":0.271023732187477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476423704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8462965,0.001837465,0.00004931672,0.006235796,0.0006164428,0.00012008374,0.000012547266,0.000009478453,0.14482239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99681497,0.00050525233,0.00015125111,0.0014842573,0.0002848072,0.0000013887535,3.1918938e-7,0.0000075970793,0.000750155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836785,0.0002570955,0.00037064555,0.00014873434,0.00026281338,0.0005928464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981556,0.0001918301,0.00012687183,0.00012501332,0.00011962822,0.001281043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008582336,0.000114400806,0.00025605338,0.00010452267,0.00063179474,0.000040444833,0.0003485136,0.00014921346,0.00020187546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047694604,0.00008549142,0.00007553297,0.0001707577,0.0017532319,0.00033914243,0.00001652492,0.0004135824,0.000017599838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013695663,0.000019181909,0.022751791,0.000004936241,0.000009751052,0.0012340724,0.004919918,0.0000061792302,0.000011722612,0.9701967,0.000448236,0.00038377623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010474074,0.00019660755,0.14319614,0.00038336925,0.00004115475,0.0009810008,0.0031372642,0.000015738931,0.00026592822,0.5957291,0.25441217,0.0005940765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03035651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13040875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3744676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016342652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015158388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97610044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477902474","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004495","title":"Reality Check: On the Uses of Empiricism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Notice; Law; Principal (computer security); Empiricism; Politics; Majority opinion; Empirical research; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Judicial opinion; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.12448802076700792,"score_gpt":0.3353811908439809,"score_spread":0.21089317007697295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477902474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7124881,0.001768308,0.000032322336,0.025145525,0.00064318336,0.00010838709,0.00002288483,0.000005589954,0.25978568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99796236,0.0003386995,0.00002200259,0.001225265,0.00030160093,9.615081e-7,1.0751742e-7,0.0000025223328,0.00014648975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989003,0.0001312295,0.0002610335,0.00007142169,0.00040872177,0.00022732602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988857,0.00022778107,0.00019834535,0.00009666227,0.00032788247,0.00026362666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006852915,0.000067356705,0.00016421286,0.000045272736,0.0012044393,0.000018691948,0.00039692348,0.000045879442,0.00012900657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047264298,0.00004638701,0.00009845405,0.00020324787,0.0021940616,0.00012376464,0.000009648386,0.00017104395,0.000013608034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010026656,0.00001593824,0.01237185,0.0000018513288,0.000030804807,0.000121251884,0.006606306,0.000021884453,0.000019317047,0.96898764,0.01154406,0.0002690498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018817355,0.00017385579,0.13860169,0.00023758116,0.00003938875,0.00007266694,0.0031207073,9.1236427e-7,0.0005196355,0.05601505,0.8008204,0.0002099456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24782048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37629527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9129726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012424667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024750964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92636955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482659382","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004380","title":"Censorship, Logocracy and Democracy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Charter; Democracy; Law; Political science; Legislature; Politics; Free speech; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.041191366519729114,"score_gpt":0.28902593959219386,"score_spread":0.24783457307246476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482659382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81897223,0.0086492505,0.000089870824,0.01704445,0.00086710916,0.00010589776,0.000010867451,0.0000127965595,0.15424755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733114,0.00086210575,0.00020983892,0.000862675,0.00045044348,5.543827e-7,1.4088089e-7,0.0000036922738,0.00027940728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990141,0.000083568906,0.00021901634,0.00009462877,0.00027059187,0.00031808886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987652,0.0001237273,0.00012037323,0.00005623882,0.0002731817,0.0006613195],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038244095,0.00007770723,0.00016329646,0.000070943766,0.0020395627,0.00004716439,0.00023219615,0.000056618836,0.0001284951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034106063,0.00007217409,0.000056366738,0.00015148848,0.0019694315,0.00034805504,0.000011681029,0.00018010358,0.000023931423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000099607605,0.000009887389,0.058373168,0.0000029835405,0.000028292061,0.0008774167,0.007139727,0.0000066774164,0.000015033105,0.92885345,0.00332879,0.0013546298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002901714,0.000088299195,0.10096451,0.000120939294,0.000036992922,0.00046128605,0.0014526792,0.0000012621506,0.000044226847,0.10452019,0.79175276,0.00026668774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.110887095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2842476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82433325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011643337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019576221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492403657","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005774","title":"Hate Speech and Pornography in Canada: A Qualified Deontological Response to a Consequentialist Argument","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Pornography; Normative; Sociology; Law; Deontological ethics; Democracy; Identity (music); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Medicine","score_opus":0.02420541552427644,"score_gpt":0.30195516973519826,"score_spread":0.2777497542109218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492403657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97782344,0.0013359957,0.000041289684,0.014726075,0.00042287156,0.00017606374,0.000020949532,0.0000043652103,0.0054489304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957665,0.000083563595,0.000622618,0.0032344537,0.00010237136,0.0000016150366,4.120741e-7,0.000005068993,0.00018335265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980644,0.00032194273,0.000428066,0.000160515,0.00043974066,0.00058535306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793524,0.00023726116,0.00015556048,0.00010402104,0.0001971811,0.0013707438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033910193,0.000113696406,0.00023759794,0.000050994033,0.0004274693,0.00011112537,0.000359786,0.000121804704,0.00011083108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036251906,0.00010292502,0.00007131105,0.00042582885,0.0005229942,0.00015401863,0.000012942758,0.0003082121,0.0000021040744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00257297,0.00013231354,0.2115188,0.000068535315,0.00024714723,0.03545004,0.2039037,0.0000690915,0.0049035857,0.47292078,0.05831316,0.009899881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006669306,0.00015763206,0.07454755,0.00022804507,0.000028439128,0.00024342554,0.026481774,7.025911e-7,0.00050407974,0.002862125,0.89390206,0.00037725866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97847193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99986625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8355889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010836802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059289928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493931398","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004331","title":"Gender, Multiculturalism and Dialogue: The Case of Jewish Divorce","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Judaism; Negotiation; Law; Sociology; Political science; Power (physics); Family law; Civil law (Civil law); Ethnic group; Gender studies; Public law","score_opus":0.05870838004157729,"score_gpt":0.305949515897247,"score_spread":0.2472411358556697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493931398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.982981,0.008595162,0.0000068688246,0.003818697,0.00047633436,0.0001781799,0.000020158428,0.000006904985,0.003916691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979088,0.00092420756,0.00026516512,0.00033765522,0.00032421225,0.0000023692064,3.5908533e-7,0.0000067047813,0.00023056418],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985709,0.00024123449,0.0003777983,0.0001302944,0.0002892296,0.00039051057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981762,0.00030701864,0.00030512307,0.00012201051,0.00050491176,0.00058470765],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058889226,0.00013367402,0.00026906555,0.000035972032,0.0020361645,0.0000742138,0.00039980115,0.00009406878,0.00004808359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000611278,0.00008405451,0.000115886694,0.00018670382,0.0025152992,0.00038210105,0.00003251808,0.00028452434,0.000004130711],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024638846,0.0000500035,0.026041374,0.000068305155,0.00031759258,0.013187165,0.8189502,0.00006816631,0.000510768,0.120043516,0.016088268,0.004650005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027187183,0.00044694124,0.19293241,0.0005063308,0.00056685717,0.019034052,0.1291214,0.000055937933,0.0011655834,0.006109766,0.6456688,0.0016731849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33109936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55890113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6898288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017951913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046493812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502850426","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002290","title":"Property as Ontology: On Aboriginal and English Understandings of Ownership","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Epistemology; Relation (database); Categorization; Determinative; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Ontology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.022132277319380663,"score_gpt":0.2966466945513993,"score_spread":0.27451441723201864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502850426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43754047,0.0014118308,0.000002758502,0.007599243,0.000483428,0.00013157114,0.0000105483605,0.000010742611,0.5528094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99336696,0.0007201484,0.00010379048,0.0011420745,0.0003218575,7.404692e-7,2.8344672e-7,0.0000059920794,0.0043381765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988894,0.00012042469,0.0002257254,0.00012171785,0.0003204807,0.000322264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988623,0.00007098987,0.00014237917,0.0000894603,0.00024377414,0.0005910837],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006257691,0.000094845826,0.0001970634,0.000017063721,0.00049218594,0.00008465115,0.0003318794,0.00016148682,0.0009679471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010516115,0.00006425011,0.00008128193,0.00016607525,0.0014173199,0.00030988565,0.000002329485,0.0003200892,0.0000087095905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006864761,0.00002634776,0.004500592,0.00002231573,0.00004813634,0.0001638576,0.102330096,0.000009906437,0.000030713436,0.8794677,0.01051144,0.0028202145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025910666,0.00022894367,0.00061256357,0.00018028928,0.000028862509,0.000030636053,0.0071192854,5.0555815e-7,0.00011594342,0.009127141,0.9821723,0.00012441097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040338993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16746555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97166085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022731024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019499982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522403117","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006317","title":"Mandates of the State: Canadian Sovereignty, Democracy, and Indigenous Claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Autonomy; Democracy; Deliberation; Inclusion (mineral); Negotiation; State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Ethos; Politics; Inclusion–exclusion principle; Deliberative democracy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.008731184738897587,"score_gpt":0.25768411704483285,"score_spread":0.24895293230593527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522403117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93479544,0.00079428917,0.000011861929,0.0013786562,0.0010067957,0.00024637935,0.000032982887,0.000003395288,0.061730184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99690443,0.001080236,0.000108181724,0.00036450374,0.00031493406,3.0174974e-7,8.8969307e-7,0.000011379967,0.0012151547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817914,0.0003021281,0.00039751243,0.0001279032,0.00033151478,0.0006617741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752665,0.00013514791,0.000346338,0.00020051654,0.00040886784,0.00138251],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014314968,0.00011332798,0.00021501833,0.00016781788,0.0059632575,0.00011480313,0.00064199243,0.00011989987,0.00016285937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026327856,0.00008235208,0.00006589758,0.00022900607,0.00083090225,0.00027937084,0.0000016125174,0.00028589374,0.000007950036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066071984,0.000017183806,0.03161757,0.000047265363,0.000031021464,0.000027779832,0.3821349,0.00001951302,0.0000048304178,0.5842921,0.00047023935,0.0013309828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021312051,0.00012986045,0.024061846,0.00018356343,0.000037348193,0.00008580115,0.002736095,0.0000035897772,0.00032983086,0.08444152,0.88754994,0.00022751055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9881647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88707966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046365723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06084218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99533087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2577507033","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2017.8","title":"When Procedure Takes Priority: A Theoretical Evaluation of the Contemporary Trends in Criminal Procedure and Evidence Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University; Tel Aviv University; University of Toronto; Hebrew University of Jerusalem","keywords":"Discretion; Flexibility (engineering); Procedural law; Law; Substantive law; Political science; Criminal law; Judicial discretion; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Legal practice; Sociology; Economics; Judicial review","score_opus":0.12494761606815333,"score_gpt":0.40590318473112375,"score_spread":0.28095556866297045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2577507033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92418206,0.010012864,0.000013791243,0.022332884,0.00055440323,0.0004495234,0.000011496597,0.000007238346,0.042435765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991834,0.00003976011,0.00017869801,0.0003260131,0.00015116413,0.0000057258335,1.216179e-7,0.000010155608,0.00010491942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972593,0.00043241895,0.0005121444,0.00023353573,0.0012409374,0.00032164008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971592,0.00027315764,0.0007637594,0.00036917144,0.001041238,0.0003934932],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043729693,0.0001408826,0.00029561445,0.00014884051,0.000973466,0.0004257729,0.0013705541,0.00015104926,0.00012461514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005961647,0.000104949475,0.0000830297,0.00019301866,0.0032530748,0.0012590066,0.000043434437,0.00039826325,0.0000012222713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106679836,0.00004203701,0.0436371,0.0001691858,0.000025365336,0.00013430478,0.04235008,0.000015438392,0.00008937744,0.893072,0.0014345841,0.018923832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022536502,0.00057689013,0.53288054,0.013155999,0.0005512795,0.00058484945,0.012690421,0.0002785639,0.0010993562,0.40631986,0.02869332,0.0009152762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015135154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48924345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002026001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007111001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586340792","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006330","title":"‘Obligations’, Decolonization and Indigenous Rights to Governance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Obligation; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Geography","score_opus":0.01290009913857267,"score_gpt":0.2809436500038997,"score_spread":0.26804355086532705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586340792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829615,0.0008767335,0.00029998572,0.006499191,0.0005174071,0.00019927711,0.000007364924,0.0000097575,0.008628817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974589,0.00007375295,0.0010716168,0.0006860487,0.000310764,0.0000027291997,3.2391293e-7,0.000005021997,0.00039087966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989312,0.000115211675,0.00023099259,0.00011338175,0.00029593403,0.00031324135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852866,0.00012244264,0.0001869204,0.0000718625,0.00038750368,0.00070260395],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054913136,0.00008453623,0.00015658364,0.000040462193,0.001450399,0.0001719141,0.000280124,0.000068382695,0.000051846513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056559313,0.00007313228,0.000034977405,0.00022583304,0.00032008038,0.0003839047,0.000013183348,0.00012905062,0.00002526186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013418534,0.000024916195,0.06281273,0.000022838345,0.00006710448,0.00007689094,0.22927162,0.0002090734,0.00013072704,0.6890883,0.007268767,0.011013607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022339934,0.00013909489,0.16107914,0.00013703098,0.000029301043,0.000017020126,0.0009594936,0.000007932498,0.00020413393,0.00816615,0.82878864,0.00024863088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19287767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.772002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8215199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039977636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041344177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587453561","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006032","title":"Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Law edited by François Tanguay-Renaud and James Stribopoulos Oxford and Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2012. ISBN 978-1-84946-010-1. xii + 321 pp.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Publishing; Law; Subject matter; Queen (butterfly); Index (typography); German; Sociology; Political science; History; Library science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.029609670987713454,"score_gpt":0.2849894635113597,"score_spread":0.25537979252364623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587453561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59702903,0.03524801,0.00013619907,0.33867612,0.00084641244,0.0007284442,0.00030312486,0.000016539174,0.027016101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99551004,0.00090989086,0.00032577678,0.0025736857,0.00048194345,0.000005504342,0.000010402479,0.000015420037,0.00016730664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770534,0.00028222965,0.0005280589,0.00031362876,0.00065249094,0.0005182356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972407,0.0006215204,0.00031652141,0.00015923932,0.00059592404,0.0010660713],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018619099,0.00022609608,0.00033603367,0.00023048364,0.00077639055,0.0013265895,0.0007447496,0.00019944823,0.00035982585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051336084,0.00019063866,0.00007315343,0.00026235176,0.0017964519,0.003982971,0.000025956017,0.000627791,7.888788e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029065846,0.000016254313,0.0022423195,0.000027268137,0.000043061726,0.00009807138,0.050707646,0.000002514024,0.00005496861,0.93447673,0.011305556,0.000996518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014481944,0.00032555626,0.012106645,0.0008625522,0.00023687599,0.0006016687,0.059824523,0.000036638507,0.000076179684,0.46074858,0.46300498,0.0007275958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7028163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9314522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47372815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023209747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016119748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26166760","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005737","title":"On the Intrinsic Value of Arabic in Israel—Challenging Kymlicka on Language Rights","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Minority Rights and Languages","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minority language; Political science; Linguistics; Minority rights; Identity (music); Immigration; Cultural rights; Sociology; Law; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014858159740188805,"score_gpt":0.2940361181945036,"score_spread":0.2791779584543148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26166760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9419519,0.0009390951,0.000019940395,0.0025462622,0.00033228294,0.00011287163,0.0000043341624,0.0000042187826,0.05408911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861825,0.00003254413,0.00004701755,0.0006727875,0.0003157987,5.7488455e-7,2.2144539e-7,0.000006889871,0.0003059219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984714,0.00017748222,0.00036572258,0.00012178624,0.00043394702,0.00042966692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855995,0.00054423074,0.00021869759,0.000193957,0.000107517815,0.00037565402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020263996,0.00011020372,0.00020981708,0.00025621554,0.00037560367,0.000052807347,0.00055590674,0.000095744894,0.00027824985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023576814,0.000070225855,0.00009148952,0.0002821698,0.00039133124,0.0001431001,0.000007468722,0.000426023,0.000017008915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000149223515,0.00002226432,0.0005607792,0.0000060184793,0.000010489178,0.0005775537,0.025548993,0.00003369075,0.000045762943,0.9712142,0.00025752652,0.0017078501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034564305,0.002449248,0.0941728,0.006043163,0.00017952948,0.00024499034,0.12759705,0.000067325695,0.021743609,0.16384232,0.5779614,0.0022421817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24390458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78495765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80737185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025948772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047712267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76113033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740952829","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2017.15","title":"Unreliable Narration in Law and Fiction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Agatha; Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Law and literature; Law; Sociology; Literature; Psychology; History; Political science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022057949928167897,"score_gpt":0.30214382925243377,"score_spread":0.2800858793242659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740952829","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39993662,0.0030502148,0.000037589354,0.016773334,0.0023407035,0.00019098607,0.000008938531,0.000010227638,0.5776514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99775124,0.00033146242,0.0001494414,0.0007062675,0.0002831361,9.2320823e-7,2.8618834e-7,0.000003486564,0.0007737887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993222,0.00005735365,0.00015866986,0.000080076345,0.00017347264,0.00020822253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923486,0.000025239626,0.00017987011,0.0001125371,0.00013328163,0.00031423708],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006939332,0.00005330947,0.000100446356,0.000009507422,0.0017666481,0.00038095767,0.0002966601,0.000116547875,0.000081510174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014034551,0.000050448805,0.000037027916,0.000046728626,0.000820526,0.0009145051,0.0000072297007,0.00020725654,0.000003875494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047768494,0.0000065905883,0.0069996347,0.000007143271,0.000007020055,0.00006656369,0.025200628,0.00001650782,0.00009283001,0.9601801,0.0069484087,0.00046981627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027483676,0.000045310102,0.006679218,0.00019323433,0.000011608427,0.000021527369,0.0045312466,0.000007342348,0.00014519939,0.022663929,0.9652983,0.00012824187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13993761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7568179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9583499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001545182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005232844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742011336","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2017.12","title":"Should the Injustice Done to Her be the Law’s Concern? The Case of Cinderella","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Harm; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Mistake; Sociology; Political science; Economic Justice; Settlement (finance); Business","score_opus":0.10124538374452363,"score_gpt":0.36336047326480053,"score_spread":0.2621150895202769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742011336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36093667,0.005109329,0.0015905868,0.33905587,0.0066607837,0.0013246207,0.00014822137,0.000019087034,0.28515482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99126726,0.0001001515,0.000038515693,0.0059640906,0.0010276182,0.0000034208017,1.023252e-7,0.000012211253,0.001586654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982117,0.00032637935,0.00037920312,0.000145112,0.0004621101,0.00047550086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971839,0.00053402747,0.00048962235,0.00074360886,0.0004266831,0.0006221274],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023895374,0.00013446313,0.00023011319,0.000029264167,0.004774514,0.00054539734,0.0024601629,0.0001093061,0.00025994013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004631925,0.00006426271,0.00014271747,0.00012471493,0.017458824,0.0003407627,0.00005917621,0.00047141497,0.000015445703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012743092,0.000007769007,0.00032584352,0.0000049913433,0.00004114669,0.0007380288,0.029611519,0.000026881457,0.000021977947,0.95698553,0.011424548,0.000799029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033133876,0.00013785635,0.00054331316,0.00012781301,0.00018769885,0.00059991574,0.01848864,0.000010448949,0.00027600554,0.015692037,0.9633885,0.00021644667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40545207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91636914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95196396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013880945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013814379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789658255","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2018.7","title":"Transfer by Contract in Kant, Hegel, and Comparative Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; German; Obligation; Philosophy; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Contract theory; Social contract; Political science; Epistemology; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03531703248714378,"score_gpt":0.24171365808323966,"score_spread":0.2063966255960959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789658255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9681426,0.0007277753,0.000038386588,0.00092720304,0.00029845416,0.00010717318,0.000009002208,0.000006432284,0.029742926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959006,0.00000836046,0.000021727903,0.0033038668,0.000645934,0.0000010994462,0.0000024378312,0.000009715257,0.00010625999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990192,0.00001506198,0.00035170245,0.00015221287,0.00014972029,0.0003121167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993851,0.000031888394,0.00012436107,0.00010455229,0.00024208962,0.00011199139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026198,0.0001486255,0.0002907103,0.00013886602,0.00026303667,0.0003432066,0.0002537697,0.00006008551,0.0004111402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000032770556,0.00012680553,0.00004589857,0.00014073186,0.00052119914,0.0015778719,0.000009833989,0.00022066572,0.000053861135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043021955,0.000020988728,0.0032572118,0.000024190116,0.000019581119,0.00024962384,0.0003807837,0.000002924167,0.00058577524,0.99111277,0.004124838,0.00017827319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014602665,0.00012134538,0.0094937235,0.00034667013,0.000063681015,0.000077170116,0.00012915333,0.00013763197,0.0009234181,0.060832605,0.9259769,0.0004374507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044445872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6721139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9302802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047151105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001386883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9619172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790018451","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2018.2","title":"Notes Toward a Postmodern Principle","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discoverability; Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Postmodernism; Statutory interpretation; Epistemology; Normative; Rhetorical question; Sociology; CITES; Directive; Reading (process); Linguistics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.028169165798758774,"score_gpt":0.3403192242615245,"score_spread":0.3121500584627657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790018451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6505607,0.0019773156,0.0029254109,0.01070697,0.0022437088,0.00019940037,0.00001857035,0.000025818325,0.33134216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963964,0.000015123893,0.0006442764,0.001643654,0.0009419214,6.726747e-7,4.1665447e-7,0.0000073737697,0.00035015622],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900514,0.00008888286,0.00022802652,0.00009323468,0.00027277006,0.00031193375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864525,0.0000666424,0.00014814112,0.00010432626,0.00047894043,0.0005566783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005168736,0.00006957458,0.00011873763,0.000080888436,0.00039059244,0.00017150151,0.000412868,0.00007197826,0.0007097647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004905063,0.00006358578,0.00007341551,0.00013518342,0.00048989727,0.00058694655,0.000008826165,0.000155363,0.00010093616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050137864,0.000026146576,0.010237622,0.00001831332,0.00006242361,0.00055937195,0.49386033,0.000008252899,0.0012579454,0.47762892,0.002025749,0.0142647745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015451017,0.00027822613,0.0019744067,0.00013822035,0.000023616562,0.000047130026,0.000805326,0.000029635352,0.0019549995,0.0030639542,0.9913611,0.0001688774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1517964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5656546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98933536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018695564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018457252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85385185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969451865","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2019.21","title":"Contract Damages, Moral Agency, and Henry James’ <i>The Ambassadors</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Plaintiff; Agency (philosophy); Compensation (psychology); Law and economics; Moral agency; Financial compensation; Agency cost; Law; Economics; Breach of contract; Actuarial science; Business; Sociology; Political science; Finance; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019547925876030298,"score_gpt":0.28231352270139554,"score_spread":0.26276559682536527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969451865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8818167,0.0028676,0.00004907689,0.02364289,0.0005888486,0.0003065243,0.000030095322,0.000010169335,0.09068813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960434,0.00019689614,0.00012758684,0.0021192816,0.00028501483,0.0000021886037,5.2708145e-7,0.000008125339,0.001217011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989103,0.00011212045,0.0002502235,0.00012003856,0.00026500862,0.00034231792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869704,0.00014093911,0.00018991953,0.0001935381,0.0001636021,0.0006149483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086485647,0.00008727188,0.00015408071,0.00004087722,0.00063011545,0.00024566907,0.0005502704,0.00006983654,0.0002973839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007585099,0.000067401925,0.000070973714,0.00015781309,0.0005125229,0.00038791128,0.000018300052,0.00032796303,0.00005177701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000748884,0.000014956755,0.040085576,0.00001087304,0.000028160035,0.00009757422,0.00921796,0.000030320974,0.00034040012,0.93776745,0.0081032105,0.0042960206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017804012,0.000039890598,0.02899662,0.0000474608,0.000021965854,0.00003660977,0.00068664335,0.000013849347,0.00005132579,0.004195108,0.9656101,0.00012240747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13044585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20342803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9575069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001093687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00135269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8753446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007999426","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2019.32","title":"<i>The Coxford Lecture</i> Seek the Good: Professional Trust, Justice, and the Rule of Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Rule of law; Admiration; Function (biology); Legal education; Due process; Constitution; Sociology; Political science; Common law; Psychology; Municipal law; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.02041028390006334,"score_gpt":0.278402052167158,"score_spread":0.2579917682670947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007999426","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0603155,0.040725574,0.00033177,0.5876956,0.0033296,0.00077812636,0.00008602039,0.000015739963,0.30672207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99015564,0.00061432517,0.000032600867,0.008398107,0.00065498264,0.0000039083106,1.8750482e-7,0.0000039089673,0.00013632215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866456,0.00022784353,0.0002974646,0.0000902919,0.00043794114,0.00028187307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841416,0.0006751705,0.00023799579,0.00007871782,0.0002676377,0.00032629393],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000989129,0.00009091329,0.0001879964,0.000011167783,0.0033915068,0.00010778815,0.00058633887,0.000049936356,0.000029336345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004176701,0.000043256296,0.00009264932,0.00018298604,0.0051346933,0.00013540279,0.00003700061,0.00033811462,0.0000040820514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005199135,0.000003547824,0.00034845268,0.0000068087966,0.00003790149,0.00001590539,0.008775289,0.00001853255,0.0000073171063,0.98765326,0.002439511,0.0006414894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036070702,0.00004976358,0.0011470709,0.00007191227,0.00013715317,0.000020555015,0.003639043,0.00001203814,0.00003283458,0.061030615,0.9334131,0.000085236694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045139343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22490531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93097353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004794698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016534574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99790597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008191152","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2019.33","title":"Reasonable Accommodation for Age","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; nobody; Reasonable accommodation; Perspective (graphical); Law; Scope (computer science); Opt-out; Conscience; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Computer security; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07395497734515308,"score_gpt":0.32980345894477453,"score_spread":0.2558484815996215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008191152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090261124,0.0043837233,0.023497622,0.10955895,0.0027758118,0.0011557431,0.00007756461,0.000062968684,0.7682265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960952,0.000067682966,0.0012888262,0.0016792082,0.00060916186,0.000002715993,0.0000026780488,0.000007075652,0.0002474795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919665,0.000057155085,0.00020977175,0.000085478154,0.00021317408,0.00023775984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872875,0.000076943434,0.00015760823,0.000061108985,0.00028237997,0.0006931917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004690151,0.00005746245,0.00011890066,0.000045925277,0.00042493924,0.00016156229,0.00033933108,0.000063370724,0.00007295635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005432626,0.00005779777,0.00007843105,0.00014136701,0.00018168928,0.0004197871,0.00000449496,0.00009122548,0.000013191034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020081523,0.0000065917325,0.0007613005,0.000018701412,0.0000106554235,0.00007350466,0.013430481,0.00006857212,0.00019592694,0.92245007,0.058781512,0.004182609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042619128,0.0001757187,0.00089196954,0.00006708849,0.00004122878,0.000008331099,0.0020483232,0.00007082274,0.00034226812,0.052000828,0.94376326,0.0001639878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06716219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29022092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.905834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012804841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012666489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93904966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035659286","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2020.8","title":"Two Accounts of International Tax Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Distributive justice; Law and economics; Political science; Economic Justice; Politics; Fallacy; Normative; Scholarship; Political philosophy; Positive economics; Law; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.033239885081029985,"score_gpt":0.252856292412163,"score_spread":0.21961640733113302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035659286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75607675,0.0012597857,0.0039981646,0.039570667,0.005082874,0.00027805514,0.00007341536,0.00004014083,0.19362013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98875034,0.00001596535,0.0004856839,0.009052838,0.0015671708,5.875223e-7,0.0000027459507,0.000011091326,0.00011356709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904305,0.00001057542,0.00039160802,0.0001105482,0.000278714,0.00016550062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837524,0.00003450153,0.0007773664,0.00009180297,0.00061912206,0.00010199081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029473947,0.0000985431,0.00017002237,0.00013837151,0.00009052471,0.000180158,0.0005684333,0.00003622956,0.00080019765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039218122,0.00009643564,0.000074221374,0.00031522545,0.000094784256,0.0011682155,0.000031347645,0.00021085561,0.00012649885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021315465,0.00007695868,0.08935039,0.0005665994,0.00017053343,0.0009941951,0.0012670216,0.0025540234,0.008374443,0.7930595,0.09265156,0.010721575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010239003,0.000030622366,0.010094819,0.00025093585,0.0001286343,0.000033113138,0.0005185441,0.0017190735,0.0007236765,0.0029382517,0.98225206,0.00028635364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058932756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013739722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8896005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005279971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034664065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89089096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121173077","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004689","title":"A Reply to Critics of <i>Constitutional Goods</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Constitutional law; Politics; Art history; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Classics; Art","score_opus":0.026748426982610384,"score_gpt":0.3073624706739275,"score_spread":0.28061404369131715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121173077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069299676,0.0062332707,0.0030717007,0.100787826,0.0024149732,0.00034570653,0.00011857325,0.000022705954,0.8177056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900201,0.00007041733,0.0008253799,0.008572246,0.00043279614,6.652633e-7,2.626867e-7,0.0000017133686,0.000076405784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987588,0.00005488798,0.00036126008,0.00009880884,0.00041963914,0.00030659855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984795,0.00008089646,0.00013549464,0.00008341654,0.00055690954,0.00066376774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005430383,0.000079677586,0.00020486276,0.000103482365,0.0006365574,0.000045379926,0.0003584997,0.000046793146,0.00008141012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005602823,0.0000782639,0.000099965575,0.00028610832,0.0017707577,0.00022714594,0.000008311649,0.0001400491,0.000015122608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008025409,0.000014008058,0.0010858244,0.0000016115616,0.0000124852,0.00009022139,0.0014373126,0.000043588578,0.00006920874,0.9910313,0.005403428,0.0008030099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013529186,0.00016911612,0.004592001,0.00020791362,0.00002988935,0.000049717706,0.000653985,3.7393738e-7,0.000207124,0.079782404,0.914031,0.00014112718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058253586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08733769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92072046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018299875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004006994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9480176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121667437","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002381","title":"Professional Status and the Freedom to Contract: Toward a Common Law Duty of Non-Discrimination","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Duty; Law; Doctrine; Legislation; Freedom of contract; Service (business); Race (biology); Public law; Political science; Private law; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.025356954900259115,"score_gpt":0.3312106010967158,"score_spread":0.30585364619645666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121667437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95062643,0.0002948662,0.00015990881,0.020350145,0.00030065584,0.0004910333,0.000026354699,0.0000034155692,0.027747178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868715,0.00004896266,0.00016685651,0.0007379862,0.00015943484,0.000008766531,6.027964e-7,0.0000049256896,0.0001853311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889153,0.00013253572,0.000316527,0.000090574154,0.00031131788,0.00025753665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986493,0.00018463706,0.00021627724,0.000121381934,0.0002778106,0.00055059104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009767548,0.00006904757,0.00018099412,0.000046772624,0.00058397563,0.00009729547,0.0003426299,0.000048155023,0.000069960544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000951052,0.000049039674,0.000050431343,0.00017236854,0.0006885521,0.00026081002,0.000021109967,0.0002008672,0.0000036358147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005568044,0.000052759882,0.012167163,0.0000064429514,0.000014886277,0.000024426203,0.037541736,0.000031267722,0.00006796289,0.9482064,0.0004669858,0.0013642837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030651623,0.000469843,0.26284155,0.00039029747,0.00015450298,0.00005455001,0.023993598,0.00015650374,0.00020403518,0.03132006,0.67695415,0.00039572708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3878343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78520536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9168863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109714296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009041607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6162421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121889772","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2016.1","title":"On the Spontaneous Emergence of Private Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Section (typography); Scope (computer science); Transaction cost; Law and economics; Process (computing); Private law; Database transaction; Political science; Law; Economics; Public law; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Legislature","score_opus":0.026296379070605776,"score_gpt":0.20778364044312944,"score_spread":0.18148726137252366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121889772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78804505,0.0024374595,0.00066689425,0.0049105794,0.0030231085,0.00025836058,0.00027149185,0.00000812874,0.20037891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828476,0.00016468075,0.000055519056,0.00094350305,0.0002682677,0.0000025211123,2.7637344e-7,0.000020474685,0.0002600214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982639,0.000034443834,0.001063944,0.00020609045,0.000059379476,0.0003722431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795663,0.00020135714,0.0009797855,0.00039809538,0.000089184294,0.00037494683],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009923419,0.00012838698,0.00046143646,0.00012027196,0.0001842649,0.000052432795,0.000765906,0.00009161461,0.0012322428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001961723,0.000105578736,0.00018908965,0.000104626895,0.00052074366,0.00025416494,0.000018162373,0.00014833959,0.0003182916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015624148,0.000010168343,0.0034070013,0.000008314214,0.00004048754,0.00012475566,0.00023493545,0.000017241277,0.00007678301,0.99429405,0.0016201132,0.00015050343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000690915,0.000526228,0.0031526072,0.00051698287,0.000018791214,0.0005276412,0.00008087336,0.000020350246,0.002413819,0.7374031,0.25412887,0.0005198337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018355181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047441736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.256891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016548914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017505274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122642849","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005555","title":"Testing Theory and Debunking Stereotypes: Lawyers’ Views on the Practice of Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Professional conduct; Legal ethics; Ethical code; Public relations; Professional responsibility; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.07706624245631,"score_gpt":0.38284459148184546,"score_spread":0.30577834902553547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122642849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07184727,0.0014467862,0.00010886189,0.14600667,0.00060035114,0.00020441672,0.0000063021885,0.000008732431,0.7797706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845996,0.000042771557,0.001840192,0.012894067,0.00033937788,0.0000015487722,1.5051864e-7,0.0000066640882,0.00027562497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846864,0.0006245072,0.00034280913,0.0000850605,0.0002736564,0.00020533505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946832,0.0037969393,0.00053158763,0.00013764483,0.0006026414,0.0002479517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044909534,0.00007253978,0.00011553953,0.000070891205,0.00082068215,0.00024254565,0.00031916343,0.000051167674,0.00022841217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006386708,0.000055177745,0.00003284627,0.0002992551,0.0005337217,0.0012126665,0.000008213264,0.00045030104,0.000015778895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010599591,0.000014912951,0.00021984107,0.0000036121066,0.000014355219,0.0000069996677,0.023420036,0.000009886328,0.000052389754,0.9704474,0.0010512345,0.0047487365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006999731,0.000050965813,0.00034328175,0.0001462678,0.00003119198,0.000039257582,0.006638297,0.0000025766003,0.00012194788,0.0061809835,0.9863045,0.000070682334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04422194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16668074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98525333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012493935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019455787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96214265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123691632","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000370","title":"Constitutional Theory and The<i>Quebec Secession Reference</i>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Law; Constitution; Vesting; Politics; Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01400066725398214,"score_gpt":0.2774123435652219,"score_spread":0.26341167631123974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123691632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25148565,0.0071406187,0.00015368401,0.008900021,0.0005162779,0.0001699509,0.00004007239,0.000008381689,0.7315853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930936,0.00029559984,0.000026818465,0.0015388171,0.00031546963,0.000001362978,2.1966024e-7,0.0000021451576,0.004725951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986662,0.00039876852,0.00025004495,0.00008745996,0.00029637312,0.0003011298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987198,0.00036374823,0.00011970894,0.00008709867,0.00010810393,0.0006015526],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017908786,0.00007096132,0.00016057778,0.000013506218,0.000743018,0.00014372199,0.00030887127,0.00007155388,0.0010522581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025826143,0.000046291458,0.000049581333,0.00008359393,0.004498589,0.00031994857,0.000005474765,0.00021545053,0.00003075268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002839005,0.000002365049,0.0006274162,0.0000029566374,0.000006314342,0.000034590325,0.0012282695,0.0000021668166,0.000002308546,0.99301106,0.0007242694,0.0043299166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003187263,0.00001244157,0.0035447006,0.00017970224,0.00001124969,0.000045879904,0.00017991665,9.209122e-7,0.000008212728,0.04867865,0.9469476,0.000072006136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54712296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69675666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9462233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014333439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018563356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124877502","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005634","title":"Professor Raz, the Rule of Law, and the <i>Tobacco Act</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Legislation; Rule of law; Statutory interpretation; Charter; Damages; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012557742456289472,"score_gpt":0.26976392151120326,"score_spread":0.2572061790549138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124877502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49546796,0.016639134,0.00003393883,0.050439138,0.0014418561,0.000629712,0.000025684853,0.000012192494,0.43531036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99707675,0.00009652534,0.000024585821,0.0014734695,0.0007230823,0.0000032979262,1.7314034e-7,0.0000074484956,0.0005946699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856156,0.0002413204,0.00039981568,0.000092392394,0.00038868544,0.00031624213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985935,0.00030765045,0.0004053226,0.00013996489,0.0003238369,0.00022968769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018242849,0.00009147674,0.00024563167,0.000031394626,0.0010746819,0.00019771825,0.00060269766,0.00007750323,0.00004177584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017510836,0.00005130367,0.00008686257,0.00019311019,0.0020489541,0.00036290448,0.000017355873,0.00024841272,0.000004330222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022872706,0.000008352349,0.0025533447,0.000016995564,0.00001800611,0.000024473478,0.009078321,0.000005744418,0.000058325182,0.9845692,0.0032057324,0.0004386518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006112674,0.000046664114,0.002656789,0.00022337933,0.00005706358,0.000034633442,0.0021890134,0.0000014119306,0.00056357175,0.03945148,0.9540245,0.0001402141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6148209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7598356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9508188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006332918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013793255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82656926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125232704","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004987","title":"Responsibility in Negligence: Why the Duty of Care is <i>not</i> a Duty “To Try”","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Res ipsa loquitur; Duty of care; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Law and economics; Moral responsibility; Business; Reasonable person; Tort; Political science; Economics; Medicine; Liability","score_opus":0.0216370570456765,"score_gpt":0.27935984507931133,"score_spread":0.25772278803363485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125232704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886208,0.0003635267,0.000021597474,0.0061345133,0.0010930746,0.00024080994,0.000107125365,0.0000055456117,0.0034129664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923388,0.00003269829,0.0001911302,0.007173802,0.00013994641,0.000004203437,1.5014747e-7,0.000014341938,0.00010496096],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772537,0.00023482235,0.0006892629,0.00033585654,0.0005028929,0.00051181787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767476,0.00033811553,0.00028732052,0.00067649444,0.00028202013,0.00074127485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008352854,0.00018363532,0.00031723725,0.0001941669,0.0002627767,0.00008135733,0.0014295062,0.000121530975,0.00027158952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015428443,0.0001334484,0.00016435991,0.0007198047,0.0006121751,0.00032787464,0.000052325933,0.0008714668,0.00002382231],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047465233,0.00011424752,0.044333242,0.00014863155,0.000013484649,0.0018004728,0.031279806,0.00017888288,0.86682284,0.03439864,0.010639328,0.009795782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060428417,0.0005612198,0.062357906,0.00039983497,0.000026165102,0.00045610158,0.00074068655,0.000032670036,0.71971893,0.0046929,0.20992395,0.00048532468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018353911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30048096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28212705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108932894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017804486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98818296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133841220","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2020.21","title":"Transforming American Prosecution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Mass incarceration; Race (biology); Law; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.020175631457010068,"score_gpt":0.311588332634847,"score_spread":0.2914127011778369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133841220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96565884,0.0013642242,0.0033478634,0.0030316198,0.0007124313,0.000056668967,0.0000057398297,0.000008961787,0.02581365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99827,0.00029176447,0.00037195598,0.00042145053,0.00030421594,0.0000011103474,6.648174e-7,0.0000050282806,0.00033383377],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902797,0.00010377576,0.00023337376,0.00009709088,0.0002582891,0.0002794848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871224,0.000053967247,0.00013694364,0.00009176644,0.00048619098,0.000518878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040776897,0.000061315026,0.00015492068,0.00011085217,0.00066233374,0.00014853242,0.00019181437,0.000035069195,0.00024668203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016339245,0.00006406316,0.00013840689,0.00059426215,0.00037451915,0.00032472843,0.000003091361,0.00018006373,0.000012569961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039231043,0.000108039945,0.010782052,0.000058659076,0.00023064364,0.0037105957,0.1685176,0.00034323192,0.0033731682,0.32950374,0.0021727087,0.4811603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014853412,0.00012377063,0.0008482449,0.00016513196,0.00037565944,0.00025210358,0.256213,0.000017068469,0.002560546,0.0008521303,0.7381961,0.00024773544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2600223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9134405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73602337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024525254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030406523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7449053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186849605","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2021.13","title":"Why Is Aboriginal Title Property if It Looks Like Sovereignty?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Supreme court; Law; Alienation; Jurisdiction; Property (philosophy); Subject (documents); Assertion; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.019042129692233862,"score_gpt":0.2903120987473367,"score_spread":0.27126996905510287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186849605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032448885,0.0009872237,0.000049019443,0.0072565717,0.0011571752,0.00006885474,0.00002244618,0.0000074909735,0.98720634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8699527,0.0005002708,0.0006718815,0.020668542,0.0015402997,0.0000015848856,0.0000023021487,0.000026907386,0.10663555],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893177,0.00006778988,0.00019344069,0.000117760595,0.00031508983,0.00037417738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988572,0.000025689906,0.00009975322,0.00013677658,0.0003591339,0.00052142807],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029289644,0.000082568535,0.00014434663,0.000045954952,0.00064399646,0.00019353504,0.00032463286,0.00008850082,0.02030167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020684085,0.000058779064,0.0000882334,0.0001446519,0.00026622086,0.0002088409,0.0000056265017,0.00021814018,0.00040324708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004711966,0.0000215329,0.00042443382,0.000014480147,0.00003601329,0.0013382222,0.019724324,0.00000242056,0.000023801398,0.42498973,0.5520355,0.0013848456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068091795,0.000026976435,0.000046360143,0.000061017377,0.000015851198,0.000062942265,0.00050457346,0.0000012876117,0.00017855769,0.0028930155,0.9960367,0.00010464225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08091444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6041279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88057077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020467165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070337206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W343594246","doi":"10.1017/s084182090000374x","title":"The Role of Reasonableness in Self-Defence","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.02211771723034685,"score_gpt":0.22707006072675562,"score_spread":0.20495234349640876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W343594246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5961265,0.024445822,0.000035073594,0.0026187706,0.0024915398,0.00029144186,0.000036792157,0.000016820319,0.37393722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989467,0.00017274775,0.00007952468,0.00011367556,0.00013564886,0.0000017941903,3.170052e-7,0.000008177248,0.0005413863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990017,0.00010996027,0.00037887227,0.00008500973,0.00018780486,0.00023668677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988364,0.00017110536,0.0002522874,0.00017945531,0.00037738733,0.00018337353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009493269,0.0000789406,0.00014127798,0.00007830556,0.00037304958,0.00012529206,0.00033990116,0.000046862664,0.00013672955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018696452,0.00006043851,0.000054010354,0.00005523781,0.0004327549,0.0002588882,0.000004025148,0.0002661312,0.00001013829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004848965,0.000011610196,0.0016416538,0.000014583954,0.000009185657,0.000015676986,0.018096114,0.000020393145,0.000047168378,0.9792444,0.0002564813,0.0006378853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013974564,0.000050113827,0.0009765607,0.00016185595,0.000020115871,0.00003385088,0.0074278032,0.000016194774,0.0012327005,0.04855745,0.9412724,0.00011124317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017810715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37150246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9410159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008598754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010256709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9887298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205734915","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006226","title":"The Coxford Lecture: Arbitrariness","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Supreme court; Law; Rule of law; Power (physics); Order (exchange); Political science; Public law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.016492290511753098,"score_gpt":0.2696170006024874,"score_spread":0.2531247100907343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205734915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06569853,0.009986345,0.0026833115,0.049511436,0.0048180483,0.00020594416,0.000007687863,0.00002195204,0.86706674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974838,0.00023032815,0.000053200434,0.0012354738,0.0008411187,0.000001340909,1.0885723e-7,0.0000032557125,0.0001513741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989835,0.00011034351,0.00020385964,0.00007027509,0.00030146082,0.0003305477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988531,0.00023897403,0.00012609983,0.00008121606,0.00030124022,0.000399389],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000912543,0.00006938119,0.00012272374,0.000030892763,0.0024225782,0.00015874211,0.00048542317,0.000046660745,0.000046133013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004975637,0.000047519537,0.00007603978,0.00016519785,0.0014364687,0.00015095744,0.000010444428,0.00019884673,0.000017745879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004204983,0.0000022539316,0.0018801499,8.5026056e-7,0.000015174159,0.000017558306,0.00082293304,0.000018176002,0.0000038251783,0.9902007,0.0013781748,0.0056559774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006192214,0.000026281517,0.0031318027,0.00002794265,0.000012106872,0.000014034499,0.00021768673,0.0000020034727,0.000019431352,0.11013894,0.88628113,0.00006669999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12727596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7818279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9317853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001140875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016790027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99887615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211254543","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004550","title":"Nonconstitutional Amendments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Democracy; Political science; Constitutional economics; Liberal democracy; Law; Constitutional amendment; Democratic legitimacy; Sovereignty; Phenomenon; Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029800279208614836,"score_gpt":0.313601402395157,"score_spread":0.28380112318654216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211254543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06547384,0.0040311217,0.0005459233,0.020125328,0.0019221682,0.00013688854,0.000023879787,0.000016132011,0.90772474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967264,0.0001220698,0.00026875336,0.00209566,0.0006221942,5.569795e-7,4.236044e-7,0.0000015829061,0.000162356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998916,0.000051029692,0.00024262942,0.00008551738,0.00038578646,0.00031908505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988968,0.000041680356,0.00012577727,0.00005475694,0.00030303907,0.0005779457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041574094,0.00007568069,0.00014397425,0.00008012642,0.0011355776,0.00008177513,0.0003157467,0.000052632437,0.00024285498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014468456,0.000071673785,0.00008482316,0.00017126904,0.0011135418,0.00034944987,0.000004927334,0.0001557288,0.00005152053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004697079,0.00001109644,0.0014156626,4.4318122e-7,0.000013255865,0.00015437942,0.00090104016,0.000019944904,0.000027957269,0.9936681,0.002244805,0.0015386408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020201966,0.00009278779,0.010420251,0.000104595136,0.000024037301,0.000054965116,0.00050344,6.8472184e-7,0.00003798953,0.12149433,0.8669136,0.0001512815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05301742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1794064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93125254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002971263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037153391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9532886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213328683","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2021.22","title":"Time and Moral Choice in Islamic Jurisprudence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Revelation; Argument (complex analysis); Islam; Law; Scholarship; Balance (ability); Fiqh; Divine law; Epistemology; Action (physics); Philosophy; Sociology; Sharia; Political science; Psychology; Comparative law; Theology; Black letter law","score_opus":0.01709881830870982,"score_gpt":0.2651096134549671,"score_spread":0.24801079514625726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213328683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9240715,0.008041822,0.0000031817056,0.005750524,0.0012149264,0.0001808894,0.00003058853,0.000010833094,0.06069577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99587184,0.00016071742,0.00009605327,0.00088866724,0.0002520005,0.0000050943504,4.9801395e-7,0.000012004494,0.0027131333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982663,0.00024655854,0.00034924777,0.00018167801,0.00044813767,0.0005080802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916387,0.00015854876,0.0002116787,0.00013003667,0.00010716177,0.00022872169],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012144378,0.00011539563,0.00026294126,0.00023635873,0.0013939709,0.00006465038,0.0005883516,0.000052281073,0.0008515696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015890384,0.0001313818,0.00006928392,0.0003460534,0.00090190925,0.00029898787,0.000059063168,0.0005018406,0.000019700215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006860932,0.00011144493,0.05290751,0.00004436585,0.000098167,0.003215997,0.15346302,0.00076760363,0.00049994723,0.7201883,0.059241895,0.00939314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048345936,0.0001881209,0.018061358,0.00007677683,0.000027368495,0.00010437493,0.0034152789,0.00004523864,0.000008573757,0.005294496,0.9719745,0.00032044286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20900355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67165476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9127326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009318017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019318984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213453743","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.5","title":"Justice in Transactions Benson Peter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04144759399428701,"score_gpt":0.31990826728443755,"score_spread":0.27846067329015056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213453743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3162136,0.00163646,0.00071832363,0.008968699,0.0044968463,0.00020795937,0.00007143658,0.000015079503,0.66767156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99540764,0.000046368674,0.00009953758,0.0017079386,0.00020271663,0.0000017310342,4.0847695e-7,0.0000072321313,0.0025264053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988379,0.00023824304,0.00024803748,0.000080162914,0.0003503318,0.00024533176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992482,0.000094140814,0.00011177763,0.000064920445,0.00012808216,0.0003528615],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008308317,0.000053860538,0.00009523253,0.00015073176,0.0006533626,0.00007616549,0.00044445196,0.000020635787,0.0026578407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008302541,0.000060395378,0.00007129231,0.00018660144,0.00015497366,0.00033766258,0.000004378824,0.00040984486,0.000018195444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005008932,0.000057255176,0.0009426182,0.000008758675,0.000026437672,0.0015764822,0.014392518,0.0024751176,0.00015117903,0.9759101,0.0024850531,0.0019243879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016207137,0.0000659608,0.002532651,0.000022419612,0.000017796017,0.000040778432,0.0009105769,0.000020426149,0.000019781788,0.00062603137,0.99550134,0.00008015487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026340311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30895564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9930163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004417303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011707898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224313367","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.9","title":"Contract as Transfer of Ownership, Even Without Consideration","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Economics; sort; Law; Common law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03336708925542781,"score_gpt":0.3160125562178211,"score_spread":0.2826454669623933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224313367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8987153,0.0009608324,0.00050265586,0.020667845,0.0005018801,0.0003650114,0.00009166237,0.0000106577545,0.07818412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99850124,0.000018484117,0.00010120852,0.00080149074,0.0001264148,0.0000064482447,0.0000011240257,0.000006718638,0.000436874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880964,0.00018453258,0.0003203055,0.000088693734,0.00037623267,0.00022061059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901336,0.00010660521,0.00014430143,0.00010759206,0.0002147698,0.000413345],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008794461,0.00006172021,0.00015683855,0.000068298184,0.0008312207,0.00006530223,0.00034865117,0.000037607857,0.0012915002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010908828,0.000060878574,0.00008707872,0.00016731737,0.00030335036,0.00024829622,0.0000073604137,0.00027105593,0.000007063021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015737227,0.00002220933,0.0046243775,0.000004885148,0.00002355899,0.000049199974,0.0129986685,0.00025038843,0.00090834737,0.9797229,0.00075055915,0.0006291696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042568677,0.00017766064,0.0039733197,0.000038056543,0.00005178809,0.0000812173,0.0036368286,0.000018725563,0.0011599326,0.011382352,0.9788818,0.00017264565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11757578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31971812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97813123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021348467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034786626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238304294","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2021.2","title":"CJL volume 34 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Environmental science; Computer science; Geography; Engineering; Physics; Mathematics; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.020698966674556504,"score_gpt":0.2004634378813849,"score_spread":0.1797644712068284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238304294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08816189,0.022196664,0.00029392575,0.004681673,0.005790666,0.00008134499,0.0005024905,0.0000051994843,0.8782861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6623899,0.00032724044,0.00056028855,0.0024553149,0.00025686578,0.0000012472325,0.0000017465385,0.000013906012,0.3339935],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897444,0.000009807896,0.00045716678,0.00023544983,0.000030750332,0.00029238124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990714,0.000020501097,0.00025674497,0.00018641498,0.00008434889,0.00038059967],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003527871,0.00010425487,0.00033815776,0.000113271904,0.00017341111,0.00021980931,0.00020662884,0.00005589847,0.06604335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053632426,0.00012005906,0.00008977673,0.00006586141,0.00020677445,0.0003700397,0.000036879246,0.00013693709,0.031690493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004867512,0.000013163033,0.09326254,0.000022933109,0.00010328761,0.00029928348,0.0013827343,0.00003814726,0.0000077732975,0.028241465,0.87641937,0.0002044407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020763115,0.000017783772,0.013468212,0.0000302444,0.000009386001,0.00009362356,0.00024096236,0.000037045385,0.000029567242,0.0017700354,0.983951,0.00014454922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004900123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029521934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.574228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015314364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017534342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96906346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242791994","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2018.21","title":"CJL volume 31 issue 2 Cover and Front matter","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Front cover; Front (military); Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Environmental science; Computer science; Engineering; Geography; Meteorology; Physics; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.020420535455122683,"score_gpt":0.20573510817263752,"score_spread":0.18531457271751484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242791994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12710513,0.0048677633,0.00021240374,0.0021584816,0.0060016247,0.00009559744,0.00028673888,0.0000049263413,0.85926735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7604278,0.000095511896,0.00037587914,0.0020229742,0.0005710251,0.0000010901513,6.3158893e-7,0.000011786743,0.23649332],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989728,0.000006345265,0.00045216558,0.00022129019,0.000028801433,0.0003186022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903536,0.00001588172,0.00029970822,0.00018059718,0.00008019622,0.00038825307],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044750236,0.00010900965,0.00030757196,0.00016072855,0.00023155505,0.00018600079,0.00028148855,0.000057045323,0.047227513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039028662,0.00011823645,0.00007047176,0.000058039102,0.00051026297,0.00041332853,0.000032679374,0.0001137579,0.070522584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062209,0.000005934806,0.05137759,0.000008546837,0.000052043248,0.00003102107,0.0013594254,0.000004406966,0.000003015165,0.012995084,0.93403435,0.0001223773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019963954,0.00005695313,0.014486904,0.000025196847,0.0000075067674,0.000037651353,0.0001158667,0.00004468016,0.000023880704,0.0017598259,0.98309815,0.00014373836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007563322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002743222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63332266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013464743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011203977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249094167","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003568","title":"Introduction","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.025087845036692057,"score_gpt":0.2709248688244287,"score_spread":0.2458370237877366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249094167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31534407,0.0011170752,0.00016249131,0.0384936,0.0054643992,0.00012246257,0.000008868361,0.00001906441,0.639268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97951573,0.000024587323,0.00015937643,0.0004388645,0.0034596906,4.3089227e-7,2.7619137e-7,0.000004662269,0.01639637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991519,0.00006362834,0.00019676033,0.000075716,0.0002895825,0.00022240606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999037,0.000029482513,0.00012247005,0.00007467868,0.00032384487,0.00041249243],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036800903,0.00005239299,0.00008748305,0.00009723307,0.0005782959,0.00012516869,0.00032308215,0.000048858466,0.0069640563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007917464,0.000048432994,0.000062339306,0.000055407832,0.0003373922,0.00042687834,0.0000027894673,0.00015840474,0.00023032512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011780874,0.0000052864048,0.000078991245,0.0000010447782,0.000007360365,0.00006560135,0.0023977135,0.000006228838,0.0000109632365,0.97449106,0.02262307,0.0003114872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006560755,0.000031711887,0.00027017455,0.000017899703,0.0000073926713,0.000037190017,0.00005042188,0.0000044848744,0.00007399123,0.039022468,0.96035427,0.00006440368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023164442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25798318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9377312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023007495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032315415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251397852","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2020.15","title":"CJL volume 33 issue 2 Cover and Front matter","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Environmental science; Geography; Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.02640632338403906,"score_gpt":0.19570481258400566,"score_spread":0.1692984891999666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251397852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09351503,0.013989818,0.0006058324,0.020139739,0.0047855643,0.00019336521,0.0010599892,0.0000115934345,0.86569905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91991556,0.00016952073,0.00034281868,0.007245776,0.0003659455,0.0000011514611,0.000001041774,0.000014909059,0.071943305],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990051,0.000007150533,0.00045588348,0.00022768734,0.000029816652,0.00027440517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989516,0.000015423773,0.00028263076,0.0001207519,0.00004291721,0.00058668037],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026576704,0.00010870645,0.0003418959,0.00008887093,0.00014743711,0.00017656464,0.00027793646,0.000049424936,0.041320022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049903945,0.000120788915,0.00008122571,0.00006016903,0.00021444957,0.00038917555,0.00003375792,0.00014464353,0.04625938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008253818,0.0000049711975,0.061642777,0.000020246978,0.00006250232,0.00007548578,0.002508488,0.00004996228,0.0000028863924,0.012209189,0.9232835,0.00013170743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022356378,0.00004269389,0.00785736,0.000017222208,0.000008346108,0.000020534571,0.00017257298,0.00013392325,0.000009629161,0.00068460417,0.9906859,0.00014368471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041512693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069935346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8264005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008762973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008923614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95955634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255014462","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2020.20","title":"Judging Rationally","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminate; Positivism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.048127391765847786,"score_gpt":0.3742530337472996,"score_spread":0.32612564198145183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255014462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06728176,0.0012805214,0.0010567373,0.30307353,0.0038118768,0.00008166347,0.000010655664,0.000012853033,0.62339044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98960704,0.000044597193,0.0017804382,0.004736594,0.00056849624,8.0234173e-7,0.0000016738134,0.0000044976796,0.003255879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990829,0.00014596782,0.00024455978,0.000069229245,0.00026707907,0.00019021478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797,0.0001792691,0.00017486648,0.000088694156,0.0011583205,0.00042889107],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007956353,0.00004401893,0.00007812471,0.00008491325,0.0007003165,0.00038210678,0.00021130744,0.000046487345,0.0022104778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014716776,0.000048427697,0.000046434772,0.00042629926,0.00017499678,0.0010181614,0.000004059832,0.00030236927,0.000053353695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010894171,0.000009585783,0.0017686854,0.0000020129078,0.000010833775,0.000116584975,0.00787084,0.000016767404,0.00011264772,0.97541887,0.013681741,0.0009903708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060791648,0.000006887408,0.0017340269,0.000029534986,0.000009542728,0.000056952304,0.0022941919,0.0000014788885,0.00020401955,0.0058501326,0.9896913,0.000061114246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034112632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41813675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9760096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019089901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019587656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255131847","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2020.17","title":"Humane Driving","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Animal welfare; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Focus (optics); Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Law and economics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.04474193502420136,"score_gpt":0.36241723053700653,"score_spread":0.31767529551280516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255131847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41402996,0.004076445,0.00013660439,0.056776956,0.0027183082,0.00008695794,0.00000854758,0.000017430553,0.5221488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945589,0.000288437,0.00042930004,0.0022157354,0.00074146426,2.65351e-7,3.7727023e-7,0.000009190783,0.0017563709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859226,0.00019303108,0.00026779075,0.00009924401,0.0004177107,0.00042998977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736834,0.00018267646,0.00016771714,0.00011502175,0.0010537007,0.001112573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013073456,0.00007508406,0.0001791161,0.00006413946,0.0011103043,0.00046296645,0.0004091312,0.00013822972,0.00065846986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015633065,0.00008087784,0.00011767512,0.00022070912,0.0005486809,0.00061765994,0.000013275774,0.00045058585,0.000022540295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012793674,0.0000126543055,0.003770691,0.000007123396,0.000030587813,0.0014940255,0.025604788,0.000008971567,0.00035198606,0.96176493,0.0054203523,0.0015326065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017593753,0.0000579051,0.0044149198,0.00025237649,0.000031782132,0.00006579762,0.0052712117,0.000001137858,0.00074413343,0.0624683,0.9262908,0.00022570253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06342841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78811604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9208704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002481309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068971314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99873286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308589887","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.26","title":"Subsidiarity and the Allocation of Governmental Powers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Southampton; McGill University","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Allocative efficiency; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; European union","score_opus":0.026080910621977715,"score_gpt":0.29219534301075056,"score_spread":0.26611443238877286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308589887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64649963,0.0033356543,0.00005107586,0.09853941,0.0012325846,0.00023518912,0.000091039765,0.000005231583,0.25001016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836457,0.00006414582,0.000023317996,0.0013888765,0.000099661615,0.0000011068225,2.3328009e-7,0.0000025765244,0.000055518656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884146,0.0003150578,0.00018573222,0.00005337121,0.00042630837,0.00017805431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991225,0.00027381096,0.00013909013,0.000070758884,0.000074385185,0.00031947577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018517517,0.00004003053,0.000103239756,0.000024660996,0.0007746027,0.000031191375,0.0003149428,0.000031784213,0.00013788728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031011814,0.000033394947,0.00005228817,0.00010080613,0.0016485336,0.00014599336,0.000020822457,0.00032931875,8.669198e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018846273,0.0000054881934,0.00059268635,0.0000029688374,0.000008731582,0.000013017615,0.00841648,0.0000069229714,0.000015477006,0.990607,0.00024468626,0.000067684996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001287203,0.00025279293,0.006292202,0.000057848014,0.00009395116,0.00009692089,0.030810313,0.000029056322,0.00032670927,0.7038511,0.2566666,0.00023526624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12932445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11853433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3518649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038639896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011489226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8975501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315465013","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.25","title":"Discretion in the Automated Administrative State","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal and Policy Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Administrative discretion; Agency (philosophy); State (computer science); Legislature; Argument (complex analysis); Judicial discretion; State agency; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Administration (probate law); Judicial review; Algorithm","score_opus":0.0780024987535169,"score_gpt":0.41475526292838305,"score_spread":0.33675276417486616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315465013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89365476,0.0003143194,0.000013096015,0.03918887,0.0005769941,0.00018606531,0.000041218264,0.000052351184,0.06597233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982899,0.000070695256,0.000019712012,0.00060095754,0.00016450092,0.0000020059683,9.613888e-7,0.000003903925,0.00084738614],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988234,0.00029619053,0.00021265198,0.00006425286,0.0002779648,0.0003255224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928415,0.00015703922,0.000108713546,0.00007466055,0.00008855113,0.00028688667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001216613,0.000060014077,0.0001013204,0.00010950083,0.00034900638,0.00017030038,0.00043160553,0.000041133142,0.00008356324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016285367,0.000042216416,0.000044040167,0.0005730141,0.00036214886,0.0003119369,0.0000034832572,0.00019574132,0.00006824341],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025241781,0.000022550805,0.008422755,0.000017992257,0.000029937142,0.0026009446,0.5840267,0.00021122335,0.000075688615,0.36849484,0.033191536,0.0028805968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022896299,0.00017179176,0.04575561,0.00017489248,0.000013456047,0.000036180696,0.014915133,0.00009793037,0.00015658852,0.017649641,0.9206073,0.00019250506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21088538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7839282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88741577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107073494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015538433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7943694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317884482","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.29","title":"Theorizing Access to Civil Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European University Institute","keywords":"Economic Justice; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Underpinning; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; State (computer science); Law; Frame (networking); Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.1130655748367023,"score_gpt":0.44688745876339186,"score_spread":0.33382188392668954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317884482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08511806,0.00019897279,0.00060462434,0.34501743,0.007406373,0.00024126722,0.000017989818,0.000054145832,0.5613411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890905,0.000045302364,0.00024334791,0.007709204,0.000841866,0.000003242924,7.7034855e-7,0.000008530346,0.002057257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988166,0.0001441066,0.0002679374,0.00009719409,0.00031984903,0.00035428518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979085,0.00039433627,0.00017286361,0.00012857113,0.0005831463,0.0008126135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017782322,0.00006371345,0.0001013798,0.00031125548,0.0009940959,0.0007631297,0.000733344,0.00005403471,0.0008282847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026350566,0.000064915635,0.000043116182,0.0016252494,0.00016100223,0.0015753387,0.00001723093,0.00033758653,0.00034187912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004674277,0.0000070994147,0.0013005151,0.000009137466,0.000012641273,0.00008886424,0.026843837,0.0000956855,0.00005324405,0.8298209,0.1394576,0.0023058543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004849235,0.000017938382,0.002905949,0.000053559997,0.00002322608,0.000010004234,0.0041298238,0.000002328569,0.000044252352,0.006129304,0.98654693,0.000088184395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07154269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47905186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9039724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020703913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005880302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376280060","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.8","title":"Public Law’s Cerberus: A Three-Headed Approach to <i>Charter</i> Rights-Limiting Administrative Decisions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Charter; Limiting; Guard (computer science); Jurisprudence; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.17849941339155584,"score_gpt":0.3406026480060538,"score_spread":0.16210323461449794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376280060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072158284,0.000984896,0.0017952033,0.032680634,0.0015682314,0.0005073867,0.00011929685,0.00008025776,0.8901058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996858,0.000037834336,0.00056620874,0.0016319609,0.0006964646,0.000015116101,0.0000023109988,0.000008907554,0.00018320026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769485,0.00013973507,0.00046568416,0.00024482075,0.0006969353,0.0007580042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972239,0.000360255,0.00019026204,0.0001461789,0.00059550663,0.0014838701],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010918397,0.00016359407,0.00030847342,0.0002035688,0.0029734871,0.00033108887,0.0007251572,0.00010428325,0.00007431428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006172939,0.00014526538,0.0001577818,0.0010014229,0.0011941211,0.0005222449,0.000042836684,0.00031985927,0.00017413728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068076547,0.000018400051,0.00059238035,0.0000018277341,0.000041501098,0.00020329683,0.0053840745,0.000020262838,0.000020564361,0.9880835,0.005025765,0.000601644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032777083,0.00017526833,0.004159755,0.0003142645,0.000054548338,0.000092164584,0.00644978,0.000016127782,0.00008208743,0.17878577,0.8090857,0.00045674344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1183125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7881506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9246997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030869883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030386955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376866467","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.7","title":"Rights Talk and Constitutional Emotivism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Conflation; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Epistemology; Constitutional law; Law; Sociology; Sentence; Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.029012186724913906,"score_gpt":0.29176429331943665,"score_spread":0.26275210659452275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376866467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5585986,0.005069352,0.0005568263,0.019396996,0.0032801847,0.00023065042,0.00007466036,0.000057796147,0.41273493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987239,0.0001679186,0.000058006444,0.00032540158,0.00043702195,0.0000010407704,6.693028e-7,0.0000018678132,0.0002841299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990592,0.00005613954,0.00018867839,0.000094365874,0.0003053067,0.0002962879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990182,0.00011705458,0.00008627798,0.000042790947,0.00022330234,0.0005123704],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005028344,0.00007098793,0.00013918114,0.00011417862,0.0015829265,0.00008393774,0.00018415268,0.000053653443,0.00011967286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016006514,0.000063382606,0.000051530336,0.00027246354,0.0064996965,0.00026970278,0.000014354721,0.00013713966,0.000055655088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021085766,0.000002550275,0.0020426468,0.0000014953109,0.000018276814,0.00044415361,0.0010223979,0.000009833463,0.000008528166,0.9937984,0.0023141764,0.00033546978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014260784,0.000028402996,0.009426895,0.00009821431,0.000018247514,0.000104536346,0.00051887316,0.0000023273194,0.000017669257,0.19734307,0.7921809,0.00011823755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06937158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25996962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7964553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010776788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018895057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386170259","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.11","title":"Aspiration and Reality in Legal Education David Sandomierski","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Internet privacy; Computer security; Political science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05579560268917917,"score_gpt":0.4047973337528322,"score_spread":0.34900173106365306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386170259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66828144,0.00046532037,0.000056526394,0.17093667,0.0025359092,0.00025785578,0.000009035034,0.000019130348,0.15743811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996987,0.00007967423,0.00013712911,0.0013768679,0.00031426505,0.000004132796,0.0000034092623,0.0000041897447,0.0010933755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990431,0.0001958355,0.0002917981,0.000086660766,0.00019151373,0.00019110726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989413,0.00016439684,0.00018853114,0.000080923346,0.00029760244,0.00032725764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018571516,0.000050700295,0.0000936803,0.00027880084,0.00039117143,0.00028930264,0.00015209858,0.00006268515,0.00012122325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012126933,0.000054295484,0.000022424603,0.0007816574,0.0002003013,0.0014144527,0.0000044528815,0.00028594013,0.000020742333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013959804,0.000025566907,0.012926022,0.000010434852,0.000007261458,0.00002696083,0.022777306,0.00002185072,0.000066359105,0.9235453,0.024261015,0.016317979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018235318,0.000025519905,0.037215207,0.000053574793,0.000008112323,0.000014994759,0.0042004497,0.0000074867976,0.0000228902,0.0072518396,0.9509394,0.00007812764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29356402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64336455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9266784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002504343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009379411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387730473","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.17","title":"The Rise and Fall of Private Law - Reciprocal Freedom: Private Law and Public Right Ernest J. Weinrib","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Reciprocal; Private law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025388265958959277,"score_gpt":0.2868824142261665,"score_spread":0.26149414826720724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387730473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91068816,0.0031758437,0.000058648577,0.03387144,0.00044764119,0.00041957194,0.00007328886,0.000033441098,0.051231943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981108,0.0007530859,0.000207971,0.00032529948,0.00022672341,0.000006861779,8.073736e-7,0.000012883108,0.00035558632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840933,0.0001385419,0.00041828377,0.00018039891,0.00035573813,0.00049771846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981756,0.00025500963,0.00028776773,0.00023497519,0.0002236593,0.0008229633],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012770368,0.000121058554,0.00021037275,0.000063701154,0.0016442337,0.00041803622,0.00067304994,0.00009997892,0.000021506268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015568877,0.000091347305,0.000063969506,0.00038949455,0.0025571783,0.00051030936,0.00007050517,0.00030445194,0.000013533481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004589514,0.000006892348,0.0023837567,0.000009846575,0.00001889144,0.00003662095,0.0011696302,0.0000037929944,0.00009528558,0.9952002,0.0005944738,0.00047599326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019477648,0.000046943147,0.0029679714,0.00006249641,0.000020920332,0.000022036733,0.0003028812,0.00002676691,0.0001300623,0.030252734,0.9658507,0.000121695906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10619417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70326465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9652562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091708345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059130864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391752890","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.2","title":"Defending Dworkin’s One-System Anti-Positivism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal positivism; Morality; Opposition (politics); Positivism; Jurisprudence; Epistemology; Politics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.039561452306466155,"score_gpt":0.2970963619715947,"score_spread":0.2575349096651286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391752890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09550669,0.03862163,0.0014487994,0.014084741,0.008642885,0.00025826844,0.000045839464,0.00010292335,0.8412882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99787843,0.00031942633,0.00012167313,0.0002311221,0.001295133,0.000001981931,3.1812968e-7,0.00000773044,0.00014415779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986744,0.0000958116,0.00028625815,0.00013611416,0.00040421748,0.00040318814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899876,0.00013138205,0.00008558683,0.000065555396,0.00018446226,0.00053423265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007483743,0.0000978944,0.00020431122,0.00014305087,0.0011540436,0.0003243418,0.00032378294,0.00007416207,0.00007527482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076289354,0.00009288568,0.00013137869,0.0003321262,0.0006904308,0.00038034233,0.000013893131,0.00024666678,0.000087748784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017490324,0.0000034785267,0.001219183,0.000017669585,0.0000562072,0.0007824926,0.0027379375,0.000009646188,0.000039111215,0.9922082,0.001114051,0.0018102775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102115024,0.00005303899,0.0055151735,0.002431269,0.00011202337,0.0001827084,0.0026371574,0.000009878234,0.000111650144,0.015075288,0.9734903,0.00027938967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11581982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2719101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9771329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005686306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025486224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.890068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399160098","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.7","title":"Democracy and the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Charter; Political science; Legislature; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Law and economics; Skepticism; Context (archaeology); Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024353848710301627,"score_gpt":0.30063889887322603,"score_spread":0.27628505016292443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399160098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21300703,0.13899119,0.0012877054,0.20851238,0.008184535,0.0004222958,0.00003241495,0.000050245235,0.4295122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755377,0.00096660655,0.000048736078,0.0006584953,0.0005278959,7.567002e-7,5.1593116e-8,0.0000031263878,0.00024056516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992412,0.00008274456,0.00016779965,0.00007317535,0.00022462121,0.00021045945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992197,0.0002972133,0.000048211783,0.000041655047,0.00011023056,0.00028295277],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093223527,0.000057461417,0.00011737222,0.000054722026,0.0015061642,0.00028453363,0.00019690323,0.00003403777,0.000064809225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023269425,0.000036917474,0.00005898051,0.00017844554,0.0020299912,0.0002791722,0.000011341881,0.00019491556,0.000012751701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069048147,7.953605e-7,0.00092380133,0.0000030308838,0.000026809717,0.00016528406,0.0057540457,0.0000026262808,0.000003308024,0.9903041,0.0015700664,0.0012392184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018073617,0.00001970041,0.0011624945,0.0002717238,0.00005827066,0.00008538012,0.002001921,0.000011511231,0.0000069025123,0.27265835,0.72344965,0.000093386065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09756878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31611532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78454673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001277565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015012964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403807679","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.19","title":"Marital Contracts on the Fault Lines: A Liberal Inquiry","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Bar-Ilan University; McGill University","keywords":"Fault (geology); Political science; Psychology; Business; Geology; Seismology","score_opus":0.04678743187483218,"score_gpt":0.3290234045316248,"score_spread":0.2822359726567926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403807679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7407029,0.007109819,0.00016269072,0.0842939,0.009894989,0.0004015543,0.00003822363,0.000068487614,0.15732741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99339265,0.00019028691,0.000040095714,0.002308921,0.002397649,0.0000028598113,6.4151135e-7,0.000013614588,0.0016532817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985264,0.00015134041,0.00032456956,0.00014246855,0.0004526693,0.0004025841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985114,0.0004053128,0.00010657672,0.00014328664,0.00021427248,0.0006192043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011756148,0.00011809331,0.00015854891,0.00012687134,0.0006745809,0.000667568,0.00046475464,0.00011717945,0.00048495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026881415,0.000084794505,0.00015761104,0.00027036414,0.00057603384,0.00048414298,0.000009789279,0.0005196379,0.00007950031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030554635,0.000024689762,0.00059809425,0.000016592872,0.00008681983,0.0015119734,0.044179525,0.00003854859,0.0001248207,0.88304114,0.047206108,0.023141118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009179899,0.00012002783,0.0013836398,0.00032303765,0.000027202914,0.00006134822,0.0011310286,0.00003986087,0.000046356305,0.0029773535,0.9936786,0.00011971062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02892463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1836081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9464725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024568615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002230075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97754186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403807700","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.11","title":"The Liberal Case for Community Land Trusts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University; Université François-Rabelais; Tel Aviv University","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04959892804806369,"score_gpt":0.3373374258143671,"score_spread":0.2877384977663034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403807700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7389729,0.03312007,0.0004265118,0.080606446,0.007251021,0.00085749576,0.00015651392,0.00006900063,0.13854006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99489003,0.00013239183,0.00008571766,0.00041012958,0.00063424633,0.0000030686585,4.180484e-7,0.000008248801,0.003835723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989863,0.00023492862,0.00021782696,0.000061030358,0.00015917326,0.00034074095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862874,0.00048774446,0.000057637142,0.00012975173,0.00017526493,0.00052085496],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001806721,0.00007201759,0.00011187753,0.000047909085,0.0026354126,0.0007016838,0.00048522712,0.000056539182,0.00007180787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018015751,0.000040725263,0.000103629485,0.00014037648,0.0005023576,0.00036191018,0.000009668909,0.00045498423,0.00000971421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034935856,0.000015414704,0.0005567313,0.000047497262,0.00008538899,0.0057462,0.022944538,0.00001107042,0.000015417178,0.89771295,0.0478885,0.024941359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009470309,0.00008330808,0.00010994852,0.00009171405,0.000020553296,0.0006505297,0.00038950527,0.000034999583,0.000025676596,0.010009316,0.9884171,0.00007264069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22129704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9044946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94052863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017215013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001925328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404360679","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.18","title":"<i>Freedom Under the Private Law</i> Allan Beever","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Allan variance; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027153196812584712,"score_gpt":0.30937677465607993,"score_spread":0.2822235778434952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404360679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10108431,0.011477298,0.0018631502,0.20498724,0.0031516396,0.0005546956,0.00009570552,0.00008482787,0.6767011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943625,0.000119673794,0.00016044162,0.0028965082,0.00081527245,0.0000034060242,5.548395e-7,0.000012090476,0.0016295948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998873,0.00008585542,0.0002462371,0.00012428845,0.00031806735,0.00035257387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888706,0.00018850916,0.00007934703,0.00018936691,0.000120467324,0.0005352458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076038146,0.000086317705,0.000108737346,0.000040736475,0.000904561,0.0005480094,0.00076452276,0.00006609251,0.0002689897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036234705,0.00006133662,0.000109663306,0.00026332124,0.0007834584,0.00034390864,0.00002031669,0.00034980063,0.00010510294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.897999e-7,0.0000029963423,0.00008785153,0.0000040455593,0.000019132309,0.000057246543,0.0021727015,0.0000746724,0.000051706276,0.98803574,0.009219386,0.00027360412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042429307,0.000014126823,0.00043625952,0.00006683438,0.000023837038,0.00002778831,0.0004542853,0.000019366471,0.000041203522,0.027624493,0.9711639,0.000085459644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11615496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57461464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9619445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020950078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016160883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88973063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406479780","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.23","title":"Motivating Reasons, Moral Culpability, and Criminal Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Israel Science Foundation; University of Toronto; Hebrew University of Jerusalem","keywords":"Culpability; Law; Criminal law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03619088648613898,"score_gpt":0.2800855356902452,"score_spread":0.2438946492041062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406479780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9354879,0.0012126483,0.00014764584,0.0033676173,0.00077259896,0.00012150751,0.000021993988,0.000014940131,0.058853127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961396,0.0000349295,0.0004758349,0.0028740233,0.00010078256,0.0000013951662,1.8421424e-7,0.000008749771,0.00036452265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986248,0.0001228503,0.00038694032,0.00025361901,0.00021879729,0.000393019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878645,0.00020047677,0.00015569212,0.00021633283,0.00011154568,0.0005295129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036787076,0.00014605855,0.00022461316,0.00011914537,0.00044989758,0.00017532571,0.00047775876,0.0000669483,0.000079803904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007158178,0.00013115125,0.000077955745,0.00025091783,0.00065351697,0.00044788758,0.0000453517,0.00036775132,0.000007762656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018114213,0.000027111551,0.016989082,0.00009680685,0.000008566685,0.00080127025,0.00061408366,0.000026044092,0.015079898,0.96058536,0.0018124732,0.003941196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003346305,0.001362262,0.14179604,0.0049054967,0.0004323489,0.0050476217,0.001377328,0.00071137503,0.28774843,0.2754617,0.2756355,0.0021756147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011414864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023609592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6851237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010748262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063795084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410508113","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.6","title":"Political Legitimacy, Judicial Review, and the Legislative Override","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Legitimacy; Legislature; Politics; Political science; Judicial review; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.016584028814165323,"score_gpt":0.3208468177391687,"score_spread":0.30426278892500336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410508113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00080277625,0.055773173,0.000108593274,0.112918615,0.0005533857,0.00019325718,0.0000127803505,0.000004353417,0.82963306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98178214,0.0024744233,0.00003175116,0.014919705,0.0003776671,0.0000038517187,1.5940878e-7,0.000002119204,0.00040820526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884987,0.00019195737,0.0002787313,0.00009306665,0.00024034089,0.00034603555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998828,0.0003372954,0.00010736848,0.00006853103,0.00032057345,0.0003382173],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094498927,0.00008151293,0.0002732508,0.00005308925,0.0012415021,0.000083830084,0.00029943802,0.000042467007,0.000060838018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097127137,0.000057407513,0.000090146816,0.00022204668,0.0043961895,0.0002048755,0.000024682402,0.0002373245,0.0000054276343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009875256,0.0000026529901,0.0007534649,0.000010135519,0.000037061087,0.000029870447,0.0008329743,3.347466e-7,4.4621905e-7,0.9917376,0.0062868563,0.00029869445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032606092,0.0000175752,0.0025987898,0.00071103795,0.00016527789,0.000019198062,0.0006562807,7.1777754e-7,0.000003885593,0.262518,0.7328989,0.00008432487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23684649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36419055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018218646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033591443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99831325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413363261","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10041","title":"Courts as Multivocal Group Agents","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Psychology; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.025813805437759185,"score_gpt":0.24353648295947286,"score_spread":0.21772267752171368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413363261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4770115,0.010808737,0.0029386394,0.0029152837,0.009416615,0.0003759558,0.0001850443,0.000021085503,0.49632716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995924,0.0001779661,0.00015331985,0.0022763612,0.00038570064,0.0000039937127,0.0000023639893,0.000019681487,0.0010566316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980545,0.000027712766,0.0011228721,0.00028006342,0.000047129815,0.00046771244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983284,0.000061131526,0.00062971254,0.00028973297,0.00009407363,0.00059695425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085188856,0.00015115249,0.0005786465,0.00035361547,0.00026092693,0.00020393563,0.0006176307,0.0001624542,0.0005041614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015500931,0.00020937163,0.0002189261,0.00015880057,0.00029404348,0.00042612763,0.00002577093,0.00027340176,0.00048651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012950013,0.000024528827,0.036561634,0.000023962817,0.00009575545,0.00014090889,0.00038814815,0.00004698818,0.0000053581803,0.95355314,0.008519101,0.0006275081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009390998,0.00014150103,0.027489467,0.00023214768,0.000020456702,0.00008329536,0.00011333191,0.00020190616,0.000078679,0.21500762,0.75533295,0.00035955585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061783463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050262015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74681383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051151443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045559736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96706825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414071278","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10052","title":"The Subjects of Tort Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Delict; Doctrine; Private law; Subject (documents); Public law; Civil law (Civil law)","score_opus":0.016434396882441093,"score_gpt":0.3204014645644135,"score_spread":0.3039670676819724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414071278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09858276,0.0034138875,0.00020973176,0.025548639,0.00095798983,0.00021773772,0.00001719553,0.000008089712,0.871044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719554,0.00011732632,0.000093978175,0.0006567629,0.00012434229,0.000001948798,1.20391e-7,0.0000028835436,0.0018071127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918413,0.000065416534,0.00026238995,0.00006394092,0.00019423198,0.00022988918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989587,0.00017997167,0.00015464725,0.00016015541,0.00027120984,0.00027533286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007332049,0.00004894318,0.00010512377,0.000034095552,0.0009588054,0.0001099992,0.00063472986,0.000046821824,0.00003704872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012725218,0.00003734594,0.00007565398,0.00023573541,0.00074005796,0.00014925889,0.000013226074,0.00015489347,0.0000058506644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021150577,0.0000037438458,0.00082774734,0.0000031372501,0.00001042504,0.000006672512,0.0009114994,0.0000056578137,0.000052366075,0.9953013,0.0021288055,0.0007465048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005994452,0.000014259467,0.0018174952,0.000054449065,0.000013469944,0.000002282267,0.00055264577,0.0000013969449,0.0004885523,0.01755325,0.9794013,0.00004093701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17260191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78134286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9777481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013268107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025660214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8329078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414775782","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10044","title":"Defending the Juridical","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Morality; Private law; Distributive property; Normative; Philosophy of law; Order (exchange); State (computer science); Scope (computer science)","score_opus":0.017567693185092288,"score_gpt":0.3129356757690425,"score_spread":0.29536798258395025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414775782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05828087,0.012361357,0.00033547473,0.08804481,0.0040313615,0.00021480864,0.000010186965,0.000022876095,0.83669823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99155474,0.0002948717,0.00014582044,0.0040515475,0.0004491376,0.0000013850548,1.6426058e-7,0.0000037430723,0.0034985968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889654,0.00016180718,0.00022305267,0.00008429548,0.00029075044,0.00034355762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990207,0.00016155552,0.00010846873,0.00012423607,0.00019430627,0.00039076386],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011034152,0.00007065897,0.00012327971,0.000014996661,0.0016770585,0.00021391663,0.00078484643,0.00012142819,0.00026862844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028284843,0.000048643593,0.00015109919,0.0003378328,0.000995459,0.00021942057,0.000013608127,0.00041681467,0.000016658989],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020522534,0.000004018958,0.0011728242,0.000004081761,0.000023631103,0.000046259727,0.009794194,0.00000639385,0.000016943497,0.93418485,0.05382108,0.0009236537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007661353,0.000010358404,0.0006419164,0.000097535296,0.000027254307,0.000011615087,0.0035593037,9.420567e-7,0.000071357696,0.020438433,0.9750044,0.000060296166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015611122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20559876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93327385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023373938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029053986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415507993","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10057","title":"Underuse of the Override","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Presumption; Comity; Charter; Supreme court; Judicial review; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Legislative history","score_opus":0.021674066433417596,"score_gpt":0.30086886121503714,"score_spread":0.27919479478161957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415507993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25748584,0.0066248775,0.00023476098,0.028399376,0.0028870273,0.00015178982,0.000019374665,0.0000056266317,0.7041913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982304,0.000106334315,0.000030242121,0.0011020815,0.0001145214,4.7452568e-7,2.8679949e-8,0.0000012770683,0.00041465007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992779,0.00006974639,0.00020494053,0.00005049167,0.00022633716,0.00017057204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993122,0.00009620332,0.00012853331,0.0000781749,0.0002403155,0.00014455621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035793043,0.000046132212,0.00011751518,0.000048340316,0.0007039321,0.000029427985,0.00043326514,0.00003816232,0.000054575696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003185685,0.000033716045,0.000093232986,0.000282493,0.0012869823,0.00011172492,0.000017806906,0.00012533057,0.0000029409894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000266655,0.000004033837,0.014954587,0.000002426691,0.000023103255,0.000009505881,0.0009218897,0.00001914992,0.00002296116,0.9813866,0.0023055081,0.0003475711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016419186,0.000021593953,0.06325007,0.00039498962,0.000055837947,0.000006065462,0.001819928,7.892585e-7,0.0004016487,0.22142072,0.7123733,0.00009084846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23199241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7048838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7599659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016686034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042763515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77312183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417315006","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10060","title":"The Declaratory Theory of Judicial Law-Making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University College London","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Adjudication; Positivism; Natural (archaeology); Legal positivism; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.024187802881114162,"score_gpt":0.3113280521631375,"score_spread":0.28714024928202336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417315006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034518544,0.027367247,0.00051971426,0.008330715,0.0027948157,0.00016037974,0.000013885069,0.000009463872,0.9262852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976733,0.00023905934,0.000038806862,0.001574388,0.00031760609,0.0000015294776,6.049223e-8,0.0000026062094,0.00015265864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878556,0.00020667506,0.00033377224,0.00007841365,0.00030053916,0.00029505545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986578,0.00046801582,0.00020143691,0.00009335244,0.00040964494,0.00016969925],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015285905,0.000073694995,0.00017589769,0.00006240742,0.002214405,0.0000758686,0.00054588774,0.00006358994,0.00003508193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004920365,0.00005632884,0.00011013362,0.00025708927,0.0030873355,0.00016062731,0.000021999764,0.00020559799,0.000004933714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015088514,0.000004368101,0.0013140421,0.0000023871025,0.00004582869,0.000027663846,0.0013337329,0.000007663796,0.000013962348,0.99378306,0.0011173047,0.0023349228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080510894,0.000021181902,0.0021569724,0.0002019797,0.000037546823,0.0000034391137,0.0018276522,3.6650192e-7,0.00007244325,0.42500055,0.5705334,0.00006396891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06323579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6756939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96315473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018047345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039543174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W47564605","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003799","title":"The Left and the Question of Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Faith; Authoritarianism; Law; Parliament; Realm; Classical liberalism; Liberalism; Left-wing politics; Political science; Sociology; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01494727644993122,"score_gpt":0.3079403150364865,"score_spread":0.2929930385865553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W47564605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3061283,0.0061721513,0.00026084055,0.027882272,0.00095441047,0.00020910126,0.000012233658,0.0000072813846,0.6583734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983732,0.00022354044,0.000048996284,0.0010650506,0.00014398072,3.9090577e-7,5.2683312e-8,0.0000024809049,0.0001422866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901426,0.00030405307,0.00020369545,0.000051556068,0.00017012471,0.00025633528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886155,0.00046592994,0.00012188608,0.00009695535,0.00013465079,0.00031903863],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019692052,0.00004911078,0.00012081487,0.000015979498,0.0009462656,0.0000560302,0.00034615133,0.000069751564,0.000038706658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048517218,0.00002813399,0.00005617248,0.000043640794,0.0050899293,0.00015893046,0.000008879645,0.00021550596,0.0000037089949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000139938675,0.0000020767814,0.00015510584,0.0000013853971,0.000009564773,0.000013587933,0.0018968524,0.000008111665,0.0000018810244,0.99773514,0.000016150934,0.00014614253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029106464,0.0000330912,0.0013649331,0.000047376776,0.000016940696,0.00003812118,0.00044430618,8.244819e-7,0.00012874465,0.9645907,0.033005264,0.000038607195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076546095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24020864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6922449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008543994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093188725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99761766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128504655","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10049","title":"On the Possibility and the Form of Acquired Rights to External Things","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University; University of Surrey","keywords":"Rest (music); Root (linguistics); Lying; Action (physics); Human rights; Practical reason","score_opus":0.021248925732625618,"score_gpt":0.2517292418604598,"score_spread":0.23048031612783418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128504655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8078739,0.0009162454,0.000076727345,0.05381159,0.000659165,0.00020647435,0.000023266148,0.0000035014216,0.13642915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99038005,0.000008364701,0.00001363888,0.009115358,0.00014874553,0.0000018275755,7.362789e-8,0.000003575909,0.00032834293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913496,0.00010690584,0.00031513115,0.000091046124,0.00018834267,0.00016361971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984975,0.0007165074,0.00014541837,0.00021333605,0.00023544,0.00019181971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013777842,0.00008927406,0.00018924089,0.00006651668,0.0005973825,0.00016985415,0.00048527037,0.000038693033,0.00022920956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023158848,0.000042455507,0.0000961322,0.000039454513,0.001494322,0.00015541585,0.000027199858,0.0002298783,0.0000035725882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008896247,0.0000068125664,0.00001035078,0.0000104845685,0.000023369459,0.000011436626,0.013352433,0.0000010224734,0.000016577089,0.98605794,0.00020567894,0.00021491645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024812587,0.00007748918,0.0002247897,0.00029987431,0.00002234429,0.000006956,0.00018699295,0.000011451568,0.00018588228,0.9775165,0.021170547,0.00004905868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01510757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06923228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18250619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041655127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003006393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}