{"meta":{"query_hash":"6d5a6e18291e","filters":{"venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence"},"cohort_total":113,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":113,"exported":113,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6d5a6e18291e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Canadian+Journal+of+Law+%26+Jurisprudence"},"results":[{"id":"W1448862946","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002472","title":"Can Pragmatism Overcome the Impasse in Contemporary Legal Theory?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Pragmatism; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Legal realism; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Legal research","score_opus":0.03241627777524131,"score_gpt":0.28418534158856035,"score_spread":0.25176906381331904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1448862946","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043956358,0.012051535,0.05260479,0.6982515,0.0024906562,0.00007431493,0.000027896393,0.00013902645,0.190404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93949604,0.004444489,0.017585902,0.024249377,0.0016209898,0.0001550285,0.000020928868,0.00010159108,0.012325537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97732556,0.014296113,0.0006756697,0.0018928266,0.0039823395,0.0018275958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97177416,0.016667379,0.0025062715,0.0039277845,0.0033049707,0.001819502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03821366,0.0007287518,0.0014889636,0.0032595373,0.011719169,0.016305115,0.0037456625,0.013313167,0.00556555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066114284,0.0006866755,0.0016391464,0.002403557,0.0804165,0.043358777,0.013778831,0.018412804,0.0012212361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007159915,0.00001183698,0.00017718824,0.00003799744,0.0000074575623,0.00004773762,0.004528077,0.000110377565,0.000030935862,0.98887026,0.0010605108,0.0051105185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011546794,0.000015700569,0.000090629976,0.000086789216,0.000003875682,0.000050460596,0.0021956554,0.00030494825,0.000037715323,0.98309463,0.014098411,0.000009517529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003923524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037771787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03821366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009539974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011457396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20209557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1468194871","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005178","title":"Legal Perspectives on Corporate Responsibility: Contractarian or Communitarian Thought?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Corporation; Duty; Corporate social responsibility; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Social responsibility; Sociology","score_opus":0.07770124567077645,"score_gpt":0.246520838045686,"score_spread":0.16881959237490957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1468194871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02785358,0.038999908,0.073961735,0.35766697,0.0018118436,0.000047985315,0.000054430053,0.00007562286,0.4995279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93881136,0.016685689,0.0058814217,0.019883245,0.0026118285,0.0000800312,0.00003823043,0.00005203932,0.015956122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903196,0.004536439,0.0003267012,0.00060564844,0.0030418015,0.0011698642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919958,0.004808735,0.0008635972,0.00060128886,0.0010129439,0.0007176377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0100491,0.00037866965,0.0005107404,0.002078272,0.0043734475,0.008396986,0.0019297206,0.00480029,0.0024847598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008019163,0.00025840328,0.0005255528,0.0021181724,0.055796795,0.009612316,0.0035032225,0.006961458,0.00033423462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.543626e-7,0.0000036078093,0.000029917794,0.000008533054,5.8075693e-7,0.000008602744,0.00092847546,0.000037849004,0.00000824568,0.99713635,0.00059628946,0.0012409647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059828167,0.000008356629,0.00025230396,0.00015357263,0.0000023606185,0.000052977455,0.0018304224,0.0003113946,0.00004630313,0.9408009,0.056526415,0.0000089325995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017805833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011634617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017805833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009844007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009333923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07142359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500911828","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005610","title":"Uncommonly Common: The Nature of Common Law Judgment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Law; Common law; Politics; Common ground; Common sense; Epistemology; Political science; Function (biology); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01189168377211633,"score_gpt":0.2794320054758199,"score_spread":0.26754032170370357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500911828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060715627,0.009263107,0.12527503,0.18929647,0.0020697624,0.00019663772,0.00016401328,0.00012761216,0.61289173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97304463,0.001236152,0.009324084,0.008928601,0.0007963346,0.000113001355,0.00005088622,0.000053977918,0.006452328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9391882,0.030616699,0.0023981964,0.008471338,0.015340519,0.0039850976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9398227,0.038316913,0.0043077273,0.0071386667,0.008253365,0.0021607075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03512304,0.0004368767,0.0012203039,0.004488295,0.011494271,0.02091361,0.0031398898,0.008712674,0.004336496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09627654,0.00052830635,0.0010037223,0.0034414416,0.09203071,0.026763698,0.008011906,0.010206718,0.000594073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005232458,0.0000055577616,0.0002773944,0.00001834421,0.000006944195,0.000049597948,0.002628416,0.000102966624,0.000034440098,0.9927537,0.0012245596,0.0028927939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005725281,0.0000046920845,0.00023890162,0.000055234384,0.0000044543654,0.000042681382,0.0013322142,0.00031917635,0.00005817064,0.9881214,0.009806944,0.000010471927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012169075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009193655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03512304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012093376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01065877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1857506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504951138","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003647","title":"International Law’s Literature of Terror","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Character (mathematics); Terrorism; Comparative law; Municipal law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Narrative; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026945391549956465,"score_gpt":0.2984259763243727,"score_spread":0.2714805847744162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504951138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032600136,0.007891657,0.0029434487,0.013047818,0.00050051435,0.0000068003897,0.00004029476,0.000023555764,0.9722859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8683958,0.022734413,0.0020917929,0.010463425,0.0021904926,0.00009563281,0.00021900864,0.0001161932,0.09369319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847037,0.00061011425,0.000059312522,0.00014709307,0.00039902257,0.0003141986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990796,0.00043054472,0.00012259973,0.00016786954,0.00011379309,0.00008573856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011375134,0.0005416338,0.00020693465,0.0023785308,0.0037360874,0.005698351,0.00074723817,0.0024631277,0.007573757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032751537,0.0001586769,0.00040826376,0.0031285032,0.013485565,0.0036048517,0.0022191626,0.0039674486,0.00088030763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014515679,0.0000028230663,0.000067313515,0.000010717026,0.0000010775775,0.000018079336,0.0011045055,0.00006781876,0.000009111302,0.98912305,0.0069055133,0.0026886184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004014407,0.000009120177,0.00055324566,0.00027768826,0.0000057520297,0.00019573861,0.0018195228,0.00030577407,0.00008872658,0.3289611,0.6677721,0.000007193857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012070183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008143872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012070183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005376481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024393373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039009333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583254963","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005087","title":"In Defence of Two-Step Balancing and Proportionality in Rights Adjudication","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Prima facie; Law and economics; Criticism; Defeasible estate; Political science; Presumption of innocence; Human rights; Argumentation theory; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.058684851544119336,"score_gpt":0.3331830744211103,"score_spread":0.27449822287699094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583254963","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009482069,0.0023285302,0.7299438,0.05921076,0.0014272733,0.00035471068,0.000097682096,0.00020748777,0.19694765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6179184,0.0014952882,0.311206,0.02166436,0.0021008798,0.0016219647,0.00010119897,0.00030193714,0.043589924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.918431,0.05062321,0.003391635,0.007537986,0.018005416,0.0020107192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94849056,0.033233587,0.003978835,0.008646784,0.0048486395,0.0008017043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.069625616,0.0012701802,0.0016307328,0.0026991153,0.0065344716,0.010770028,0.0045275697,0.012413504,0.005745952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0845105,0.0012731901,0.00199085,0.003191553,0.043350898,0.018833341,0.011525178,0.018897528,0.00201558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009068839,0.000002691608,0.000039280356,0.000028941817,0.0000065382656,0.000019388654,0.00055254786,0.00019813296,0.000062424246,0.99442613,0.00071463734,0.0039401604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019088182,0.000013535882,0.000050376148,0.00006844683,0.000008189033,0.00005842805,0.00010380989,0.0016515877,0.00023552547,0.98050267,0.017271077,0.000017181157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003580391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041002836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069625616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00784857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008147785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36821985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1697724127","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000412","title":"The Ethics of Secession and a Normative Theory of Nationalism","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Nationalism; Normative; Autonomy; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Politics; Self-determination; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.02527542351283672,"score_gpt":0.32579539347302344,"score_spread":0.3005199699601867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1697724127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03968102,0.003499518,0.033562783,0.05303984,0.00047868906,0.000035209825,0.000057691683,0.00003562633,0.8696096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95985997,0.001273657,0.0073288023,0.0036207493,0.0004949167,0.00014757941,0.000045807177,0.000029333034,0.027199231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585766,0.0023410812,0.00013360874,0.00030622713,0.0009586933,0.0004026927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776304,0.0010280965,0.00022543399,0.00030425334,0.000432326,0.0002468347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004427613,0.00018686379,0.000331405,0.0007021219,0.0028282742,0.0047740596,0.0006512931,0.0028267498,0.0027860764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047317343,0.00018213532,0.00030131187,0.0006260029,0.024080118,0.0045057186,0.002353702,0.0028399848,0.00045574273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013480513,0.0000018449257,0.00005991814,0.0000026671546,3.743771e-7,0.000007828407,0.00028857857,0.000037483405,0.000012114577,0.99838686,0.00039437882,0.0008065094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006065637,0.000005067034,0.00022166483,0.000037362766,0.0000011753168,0.00003536505,0.0004387449,0.0003402855,0.00005204094,0.970541,0.028317494,0.0000037385414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025855422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026083519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047740596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002925711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035705075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023415744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W172127440","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003684","title":"Theoretical Underpinning of Intellectual Property: “I am a Pragmatist But Theory is my Rhetoric”","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Underpinning; Intellectual property; Scholarship; Pragmatism; Rhetoric; Sociology; Politics; Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.02244247931331175,"score_gpt":0.22930626369969567,"score_spread":0.20686378438638392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W172127440","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012134324,0.016560128,0.059563626,0.64529324,0.0028659871,0.00006214186,0.00008274238,0.00011438371,0.26332346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8930951,0.008297197,0.014477828,0.059131395,0.005071227,0.00030046955,0.00008781141,0.00013107891,0.019407906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897989,0.0056991912,0.00030138122,0.0012811403,0.002341875,0.00057754247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98213744,0.013306274,0.0010358717,0.0013982895,0.0016180904,0.00050397887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015238937,0.0005743314,0.00075586827,0.0033513121,0.007909114,0.014112923,0.0036004593,0.0088990275,0.0054356335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021441003,0.00041623035,0.00072256057,0.0026336762,0.12504393,0.020870501,0.005928851,0.013234575,0.001279848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012583941,0.0000029380171,0.000031315965,0.00001676191,0.0000010899356,0.0000143687985,0.0019231219,0.000040375537,0.000010547928,0.9947119,0.002271449,0.0009748905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066015937,0.00000803058,0.000088559456,0.00020031413,0.0000031021648,0.000059268285,0.0022056568,0.000280697,0.00009056997,0.921915,0.07513264,0.000009541545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057491073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003540412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0081895515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008683096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080592155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1774663677","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005622","title":"Comparative History and the Internal View of French, German, and English Private Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"German; Law; Politics; Dialectic; Political science; Dualism; Legal science; Legal history; German idealism; Sociology; Epistemology; Hegelianism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020968831279057194,"score_gpt":0.28548350600428607,"score_spread":0.2645146747252289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1774663677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18528043,0.017079312,0.0030738479,0.029249322,0.000256647,0.000017019374,0.00021968623,0.00006292459,0.76476085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97744715,0.001941713,0.00023974726,0.0011065974,0.0001300874,0.000010131463,0.000058722788,0.00002361234,0.019042123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974782,0.0010352283,0.000057723428,0.00028379215,0.0004446448,0.0007005319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978358,0.0011670125,0.00022793334,0.00015247743,0.00039519812,0.00022164654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026649246,0.00021784996,0.00026836843,0.0036419441,0.00776692,0.013533861,0.00072260975,0.0018407502,0.0071792947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040549426,0.00020423644,0.00023284594,0.0026383784,0.022201095,0.0064252284,0.0023235418,0.0015691373,0.00035590504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010840508,0.000004724918,0.00038513017,0.000021589274,0.0000032282446,0.00013683869,0.025509425,0.0000735118,0.00009341801,0.9664383,0.0020287368,0.0052942457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019736783,0.00004753229,0.012400044,0.00044079914,0.00003149862,0.0004309584,0.05939614,0.00042258584,0.00045110713,0.15669979,0.76961625,0.00004358403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13413756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10473268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13413756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024311576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049013784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26671362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1792010912","doi":"10.1017/s084182090000583x","title":"A Particle of Freedom: Natural Law Thought and the Kantian Theory of Transfer by Contract","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Natural law; Doctrine; Philosophy; Freedom of contract; Epistemology; Social contract; Normative; Contract theory; Obligation; Property (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Natural (archaeology); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.01669162336942738,"score_gpt":0.2765781785476249,"score_spread":0.25988655517819753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1792010912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036853194,0.040441554,0.12615061,0.25474158,0.00180586,0.00007724901,0.00019254306,0.00014781942,0.53958964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9319786,0.0074051465,0.01745012,0.014388708,0.002051532,0.00016921718,0.00006732304,0.00010179319,0.026387496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946179,0.0028922965,0.000118889024,0.0006595803,0.0012510179,0.0004603787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963965,0.0024979182,0.00023162998,0.0003794576,0.00027338477,0.00022110085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007140513,0.0005046839,0.0006517684,0.002499174,0.0052510994,0.0067951786,0.0019060822,0.0069622463,0.0036152555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056668813,0.00040926127,0.000979299,0.0019019118,0.06470853,0.015305369,0.0035673177,0.00867857,0.0005695804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016974665,0.0000022309944,0.000009928841,0.0000033381473,5.606674e-7,0.000005640061,0.00026047725,0.00007588464,0.000005415419,0.9988053,0.00044995485,0.00037965633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031189404,0.00000171376,0.00002075883,0.000012545954,6.456561e-7,0.000005873249,0.00009071434,0.00020471978,0.000009141375,0.9933688,0.006279424,0.000002502633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075404183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042432835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010320221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010320221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043597734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07487875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1815499224","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004720","title":"Beguiled By Metaphors: The “Living Tree” and Originalist Constitutional Interpretation in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitution; Doctrine; Constitutional interpretation; Law; Constitutional law; Original intent; Political science; Supreme court; Original meaning; Constitutionalism; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Democracy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013431635003973036,"score_gpt":0.275409109206593,"score_spread":0.26197747420261996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1815499224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09497096,0.0151483575,0.008147671,0.15738346,0.001164424,0.00007014206,0.0003772964,0.00012929749,0.7226083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504499,0.0045493785,0.0024663927,0.010138493,0.00016256378,0.000030700103,0.00009515934,0.00008499998,0.032022417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947214,0.0012867536,0.00008761573,0.00048123163,0.0018892025,0.001533743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664706,0.001200846,0.000195325,0.00017752516,0.0012803369,0.0004989152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003050766,0.00038062932,0.0004084876,0.0022382906,0.027868267,0.01414487,0.002539301,0.0033161226,0.004788243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006322358,0.0002701817,0.00046836646,0.0046445853,0.051003404,0.0047624265,0.0044934475,0.0068055526,0.00029844776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007169135,0.000005026244,0.0003681574,0.000018489276,0.0000025566217,0.00012949189,0.0172324,0.00014043857,0.00005287846,0.9687884,0.009855663,0.0033992326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038824935,0.000017151395,0.0048257858,0.00036781453,0.00004665875,0.00027698456,0.07654774,0.0023804905,0.00037099145,0.43366116,0.48131058,0.000155805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98655427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17810898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17810898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15770029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9532771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893559805","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004422","title":"The Cultural Limits of Legal Tolerance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Multiculturalism; Constitutionalism; Dialogic; Law; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Legal culture; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Political science; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.046076258290730955,"score_gpt":0.3158658241002884,"score_spread":0.26978956580955743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893559805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39556575,0.0047481116,0.008009436,0.045471136,0.00022913358,0.000032847813,0.000038406975,0.00003654492,0.54586864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755883,0.0003435198,0.00023226006,0.0007143604,0.000017974362,0.0000067547935,0.0000038147627,0.0000062233,0.0011162984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98830557,0.0048776865,0.00033459248,0.00091762183,0.0032210343,0.0023434453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925615,0.003331874,0.0007813304,0.0008399893,0.0013674576,0.0011178142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006172671,0.00023294186,0.00038823468,0.0018225115,0.016207805,0.010227337,0.0019513931,0.001981949,0.0028717702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016073883,0.0002821419,0.0003200373,0.0012738087,0.070108406,0.005773849,0.010399967,0.0040593953,0.00014908891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011837573,0.000013204381,0.0020722516,0.00002757996,0.00000762778,0.00018908335,0.09756592,0.00015806146,0.00017715436,0.8901641,0.0006724987,0.008940796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024420242,0.00003921968,0.011569389,0.0005104099,0.000035240115,0.0005724562,0.23428985,0.00078294,0.00055938144,0.62224436,0.12929085,0.000081552644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22602887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1743506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77397114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01585408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019897483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44942647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1908817484","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006123","title":"Reconstructing Fuller’s Argument Against Legal Positivism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Argument (complex analysis); Positivism; Legal positivism; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Legal formalism; Sociology; Legal realism; Law and economics; Political science; Legal profession; Black letter law; Comparative law; Private law","score_opus":0.021366735224586854,"score_gpt":0.2299388762014419,"score_spread":0.20857214097685506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1908817484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040462904,0.014560514,0.04229448,0.44857144,0.002142544,0.00006572887,0.00018706438,0.0001263611,0.45158905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.908185,0.008844917,0.010287884,0.043822348,0.0030518367,0.00016196661,0.00007521782,0.00013000154,0.025440766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99221367,0.0034828775,0.00021486143,0.0007408963,0.0025432345,0.00080432283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887291,0.008410591,0.0005855961,0.0004988323,0.0012962581,0.00047968392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007952897,0.00053517293,0.00085466646,0.0034231532,0.0064212508,0.008636332,0.0014685343,0.0072623887,0.004965719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015306024,0.0005299445,0.0006744125,0.0021114654,0.03680233,0.012161168,0.004772569,0.008047434,0.00050681806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029483726,0.0000047154417,0.000025722185,0.00001318587,0.0000012325884,0.000021223444,0.00063205167,0.00006831537,0.000013073726,0.9944096,0.003600194,0.0012076712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014091139,0.0000100721545,0.00011460337,0.00009339108,0.0000043311825,0.00005347034,0.0007370379,0.00033825764,0.00006271356,0.9396581,0.058900695,0.000013259043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01372669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01136435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01372669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010896154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004604554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079057574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924136381","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004860","title":"Proportionality, Balancing, and the Cult of Constitutional Rights Scholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Cult; Scholarship; Vocabulary; Politics; Constitutional law; Law; German; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.019803944092618545,"score_gpt":0.29651002073596644,"score_spread":0.2767060766433479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924136381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0439262,0.018644292,0.050311223,0.2797483,0.002022909,0.000043747823,0.000058940816,0.00009073314,0.6051537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95633805,0.005087925,0.007176386,0.011707188,0.0019933237,0.00009356394,0.000033762517,0.00010394313,0.017465899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.974101,0.015504811,0.0007024812,0.0020887044,0.0062288493,0.0013740659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97942346,0.016095456,0.0010378492,0.0016029272,0.0011605948,0.0006797903],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025189454,0.00054335466,0.00086025166,0.002978126,0.012272304,0.018945593,0.0023433163,0.005855107,0.00468152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035479177,0.00052024744,0.00052468036,0.0028362751,0.1118339,0.023240983,0.01042211,0.010401936,0.0005749075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013204021,0.0000023429109,0.0000204952,0.000005742303,7.0816105e-7,0.000006281853,0.001235019,0.000028227569,0.000009719833,0.99677867,0.0005233054,0.0013881852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061903193,0.0000029697853,0.000060480485,0.00004889958,0.0000013127416,0.000012715589,0.00094736693,0.00013567861,0.00003870688,0.9783952,0.020346848,0.000003639823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068967477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005619847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012320842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008412114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1332162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924618132","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004793","title":"A Postmodern Defence of Universal Liberal Legal Norms","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Universal law; Politics; Norm (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Contingency; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Postmodernism; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027088467439194876,"score_gpt":0.24047593244855997,"score_spread":0.2133874650093651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924618132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044396203,0.0050356197,0.15093361,0.103268,0.00105687,0.000077577555,0.00010763615,0.00025392746,0.69487053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9404574,0.0010718313,0.015166432,0.009874225,0.0009029065,0.00020563505,0.00004295133,0.000113038404,0.032165613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98486173,0.0065920353,0.00047073024,0.002299765,0.004532044,0.0012437373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870473,0.007001085,0.0011766589,0.0026052282,0.0016081394,0.0005616588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012988512,0.0005828153,0.00068064063,0.0018654127,0.0053984397,0.008160883,0.0025629508,0.006234251,0.0028725131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01671658,0.00041024404,0.0007588996,0.0011510311,0.06306794,0.011195194,0.006552137,0.010380101,0.0005653573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010635209,0.0000017072877,0.000017379147,0.0000044407634,5.70614e-7,0.000005809837,0.00069543737,0.000037267004,0.000022739361,0.9983876,0.00022315893,0.00060294446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036238791,0.0000044928665,0.00003830612,0.000027974675,0.0000010608753,0.000015246395,0.00018317036,0.00022381714,0.00008710965,0.9841905,0.015221234,0.000003506079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004291695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003813851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012988512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009333717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062878127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0686906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935216946","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006081","title":"Democracy and the Freedom of Speech: Rethinking the Conflict between Liberty and Equality","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Democracy; Value (mathematics); Constitutional law; Law and economics; Campaign finance; Law; Jurisdiction; Negative liberty; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.042061181807438126,"score_gpt":0.28640016838947147,"score_spread":0.24433898658203335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1935216946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06307115,0.015049989,0.06358075,0.28491825,0.0017940059,0.00004908065,0.00006318329,0.000112200454,0.5713614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748352,0.0018838048,0.0036766373,0.0084714405,0.0009345569,0.00007527713,0.000018404226,0.0000869605,0.010017692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98537505,0.009539302,0.00038864103,0.0013786341,0.0019015835,0.001416773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821072,0.014443999,0.00082860026,0.0013896985,0.0006561097,0.0005744398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016905773,0.00047898298,0.0007979692,0.0015498557,0.008791183,0.012825482,0.0016629795,0.005604509,0.0036041867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019590942,0.00040039327,0.00072007795,0.00086740765,0.06865049,0.015250226,0.012976645,0.011978077,0.0005639188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044931194,0.0000030856352,0.000051928815,0.000006508306,0.0000012922585,0.000013666183,0.0021159211,0.00009383977,0.000022483517,0.995061,0.0004907715,0.0021351092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014439813,0.0000096803415,0.000155947,0.00009627005,0.000005415663,0.000028505776,0.0010963639,0.0002919401,0.00016288522,0.95934635,0.038779523,0.0000126436935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004780714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005822468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016905773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007262761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062114033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089407325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W208799210","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004446","title":"Neither Here nor There: The (Non-) Impact of International Law on Judicial Reasoning in Canada and South Africa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Municipal law; Comparative law; International law; Political science; Public law; Tying; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.01650639266797427,"score_gpt":0.2685920604617675,"score_spread":0.2520856677937932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W208799210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62107706,0.021880526,0.0007757186,0.067511514,0.00051644247,0.00011681587,0.00026088025,0.00002410724,0.28783703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842992,0.003988385,0.00039466354,0.0026946936,0.000040715404,0.000017822664,0.000030787516,0.000015999887,0.008517776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514824,0.00059985643,0.00010352038,0.0003701867,0.0013653925,0.0024126584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936248,0.002367465,0.000579241,0.00016971029,0.002103757,0.0011549526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020476475,0.00033282628,0.00041642186,0.0026339416,0.022457404,0.008080725,0.001213296,0.0020016436,0.004325998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0118029835,0.0002967986,0.00042571838,0.003835215,0.011522831,0.0019329496,0.0028591633,0.004426245,0.00014138721],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017990505,0.00006950843,0.04685389,0.00082383386,0.00013827582,0.0046172165,0.30620354,0.00093294715,0.0019185499,0.5339959,0.027685843,0.07658057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074070536,0.00006210145,0.2070826,0.0018783003,0.00024423227,0.0012635496,0.3542981,0.0009550215,0.0019472749,0.023206957,0.40874058,0.00024722246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9856043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99537057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09501489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09501489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11625764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6893845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131266742","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2015.17","title":"<i>The Coxford Lecture</i> Patriation and Patrimony: The Path to the Charter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Parliament; House of Commons; Charter; Law; Constitution; Opposition (politics); Political science; Polity; Supreme court; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Responsible government; Politics","score_opus":0.028279321259348667,"score_gpt":0.28991203106191815,"score_spread":0.2616327098025695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131266742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014058682,0.06588606,0.0035460847,0.31286517,0.04334042,0.000039137536,0.00013567046,0.00014474889,0.57263696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09669147,0.03662663,0.0021455253,0.033680793,0.025375426,0.000091710746,0.0001251706,0.0003408035,0.8049225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978624,0.00065656786,0.000054624234,0.00023437657,0.00072294346,0.0004691809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780613,0.001067275,0.00012290699,0.00015096179,0.00048124525,0.00037154465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022539117,0.0006050143,0.000365632,0.0013888857,0.009906825,0.01066867,0.001147813,0.0042096074,0.024909368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056085577,0.0004576583,0.00026994664,0.0017308885,0.01926606,0.0089615295,0.0018535171,0.009691927,0.0062384414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007210605,0.0000065113695,0.000051701525,0.000025088595,5.8462433e-7,0.00002203024,0.00095301884,0.000027879023,0.000035079254,0.3533238,0.633533,0.012013962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015849832,0.000003322421,0.000114364426,0.00009637625,6.0456e-7,0.000019099221,0.0004314486,0.00003812342,0.0000434626,0.017820006,0.9814254,0.000006177272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17941333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28248766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9774632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022536822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014013671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35673803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148520867","doi":"10.1017/s084182090000518x","title":"The Limits of Judicial Fidelity to Law: The Coxford Lecture","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Political science; Fidelity; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06233093076396494,"score_gpt":0.32410361598211973,"score_spread":0.2617726852181548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148520867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0090407925,0.07886916,0.012731582,0.31278828,0.010057619,0.000024748513,0.000058878726,0.000073389405,0.5763556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7637749,0.046628535,0.0048533273,0.022047522,0.011639235,0.0000934455,0.000051841293,0.00014781539,0.15076339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701333,0.0012428653,0.00008247985,0.0003642968,0.00077411154,0.00052295433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901018,0.008194653,0.00025323767,0.00057208847,0.00051431207,0.00036385076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005426457,0.0003568058,0.0004596664,0.0009325044,0.005078755,0.006977001,0.0008097443,0.004188566,0.0075519104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015626,0.00047380393,0.00030866748,0.00079165935,0.019622527,0.010557778,0.0018895981,0.009433893,0.0013686377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007789281,0.000004981404,0.00004170954,0.000016881808,0.000001605938,0.00002156226,0.00036936186,0.00011746459,0.000024647099,0.97216415,0.021021545,0.006208394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016391494,0.000012077516,0.00026677162,0.00028654365,0.0000064334404,0.000053141426,0.0003588574,0.00061711716,0.00015448756,0.7516712,0.24653752,0.00001948085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02602033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01795621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02602033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010074453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046875165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07309562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180453660","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005993","title":"A Duty to Make Restitution","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Duty; Mistake; Law and economics; Liability; Law; Payment; Common law; Business; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.027549752726063303,"score_gpt":0.3140123958049609,"score_spread":0.28646264307889757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180453660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041782267,0.0018464281,0.115771465,0.0355767,0.0018639833,0.0003921105,0.0003126979,0.00030182136,0.8021525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7892657,0.0013666807,0.033571478,0.025162257,0.0011360407,0.0005334434,0.00022866116,0.00020136945,0.14853443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846029,0.0033983572,0.0017155318,0.002511707,0.0057028746,0.002068687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864314,0.0041762413,0.0012431947,0.0040688547,0.003231749,0.00084852084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010114501,0.00060510717,0.00091194874,0.0012130014,0.005511469,0.0055840756,0.0025071574,0.009406701,0.0067831185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021330703,0.0007665751,0.00107341,0.00052262394,0.02271066,0.0074626314,0.0067748697,0.008565414,0.0029129277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009150652,0.000024741892,0.00032920993,0.000024760446,0.0000075943144,0.00009115364,0.0012020536,0.00016560346,0.00030841382,0.98917866,0.0032298039,0.0054288204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045123026,0.00010069878,0.0014423562,0.0003731869,0.000045320074,0.000722157,0.0009843333,0.0009772895,0.0016721,0.70854646,0.28499165,0.00009926096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00731535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061691497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010114501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002505183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009619109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053491235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182572518","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003611","title":"Truth and Method in the Domestic Application of International Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); International law; Reading (process); Law; Human rights; Landmark; Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Geography; Cartography; Linguistics","score_opus":0.018371524925188138,"score_gpt":0.33127824241922627,"score_spread":0.31290671749403814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182572518","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012880522,0.02860119,0.13847482,0.042104553,0.0021858138,0.00009629926,0.00008101812,0.00016927403,0.7754064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89869463,0.009548715,0.03967945,0.0068246275,0.0020122507,0.0004041174,0.000088351946,0.00039607397,0.04235181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97576785,0.01788267,0.0007793402,0.0017760545,0.0026678129,0.0011262824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883676,0.009119476,0.00040328444,0.0013932135,0.0005313606,0.00018501093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019577386,0.0007272679,0.0010622593,0.003679645,0.0069055124,0.014771849,0.0018030788,0.006282479,0.0049991957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016849764,0.0005120248,0.0008523729,0.0030931702,0.08340064,0.017313492,0.006570045,0.007435499,0.00092792633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020014174,0.0000014981135,0.000019485,0.000012988661,0.0000010505231,0.000016205122,0.0028587065,0.000043790067,0.00001789344,0.99487925,0.0004894137,0.0016575381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005684594,0.000010663922,0.000055704008,0.00015691096,0.0000032438993,0.000057079455,0.0020394188,0.00025251543,0.0001763538,0.93132806,0.06590502,0.000009341846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026358024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017239781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019577386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062201954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039711306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10353637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197172152","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006299","title":"Contempt No More","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Emancipation; Colonialism; Orthodoxy; Appeal; Government (linguistics); Racism; Political science; Sociology; Harm; Oppression; Law; History; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011938983494093903,"score_gpt":0.252184209530825,"score_spread":0.2402452260367311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197172152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025461663,0.0038169941,0.002882656,0.15944213,0.013842686,0.00007256594,0.00008418198,0.0000736095,0.8172391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12898883,0.0034125545,0.0011172622,0.17847688,0.008948417,0.00015921053,0.00012908394,0.00027940716,0.6784884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99289703,0.0024022239,0.00019926677,0.0012805973,0.002070655,0.0011502103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99494886,0.0015268412,0.00034134058,0.00089092646,0.0012192139,0.0010727895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055525834,0.0008226701,0.0005562514,0.00061927066,0.009966966,0.0069500557,0.0018709841,0.0070565417,0.06405322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014584196,0.00033025598,0.000796317,0.000600662,0.016292365,0.010546369,0.009032841,0.015094304,0.017426237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031815805,0.00003784373,0.00026325858,0.00011159568,0.000007362141,0.0003296037,0.011076996,0.00006681997,0.0003287431,0.75626755,0.2117379,0.019740518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000484734,0.000013664461,0.00011434699,0.00019031124,0.0000032055004,0.00012744119,0.0029880004,0.00003715236,0.00010096651,0.035437483,0.9609701,0.000012517517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011118143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017913075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9888819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060165883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006239825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21427935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202214160","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005476","title":"Private Property and Tax Policy in a Libertarian World: A Critical Review","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tax policy; Law and economics; Economics; Tax reform; Public economics","score_opus":0.07894097353695297,"score_gpt":0.31361371317780035,"score_spread":0.2346727396408474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202214160","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013867351,0.9951408,0.00009849097,0.002406226,0.0001493994,0.0000032997564,0.000007738918,0.000001622108,0.0020537837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003083901,0.99563897,0.00012146789,0.00058138877,0.00023972215,0.0000063844814,0.000012957243,0.0000017668367,0.00031341732],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905616,0.00036175802,0.0000700882,0.00012990739,0.00032523792,0.00005693464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960502,0.0026820023,0.00020935656,0.00007224978,0.0009246516,0.00006166769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023476568,0.0005414196,0.0011796795,0.006443824,0.0010591445,0.002857584,0.000873198,0.0026650513,0.0025944097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060353843,0.0005678924,0.00047995738,0.009931026,0.003089432,0.0045842254,0.00087999227,0.0024829106,0.00087193795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006691507,0.00009576443,0.0010044591,0.01753642,0.00016120757,0.00035462252,0.0011388273,0.001754416,0.00025887572,0.2370115,0.14975423,0.5908627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010628944,0.00002721038,0.0015752758,0.017752176,0.00007848859,0.00021342249,0.0006970834,0.00022997495,0.00014702669,0.027118629,0.9521282,0.000021803065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017416548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019543542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017416548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050970344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007610233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0369817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2205513482","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005932","title":"The Coxford Lecture: Judging The Judges: “May They Boldly Go Where Ivan Rand Went Before”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Globalization; Constitutional law; Constitution; Common law; Rule of law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.013849219066436026,"score_gpt":0.2602579865963203,"score_spread":0.2464087675298843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2205513482","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029885073,0.091371894,0.00055002095,0.80795634,0.04774861,0.000010396384,0.00003445212,0.000042114516,0.05198738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0681057,0.08837781,0.0026077104,0.40113288,0.091897815,0.00011973934,0.00013361305,0.0004024415,0.34722233],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419963,0.002505369,0.00019405647,0.0008118727,0.0016499961,0.0006391546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877714,0.0069798483,0.00036795685,0.0003472077,0.00244165,0.0020919226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074599795,0.00094439497,0.0007284637,0.001353452,0.010711388,0.012295758,0.0015814435,0.010294979,0.017448934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02289272,0.00089983986,0.0005174458,0.0009948247,0.01233251,0.012831339,0.002116656,0.021738745,0.008271394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013541502,0.000009728756,0.000080228034,0.0000323585,0.0000029354003,0.000025222273,0.00040045445,0.000024378076,0.00003785857,0.033698153,0.95450324,0.011171922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010939572,0.000007834497,0.00039209324,0.0005311397,0.000004172028,0.000043203723,0.0011012185,0.000080627855,0.0000827992,0.02831092,0.9694066,0.000028525377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06518054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12634344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93481946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012342759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011841185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12960231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213372811","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002435","title":"A Classical Perspective on the Modern Workplace: The Aristotelian Conflict in Sexual Harassment Litigation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Plaintiff; Injustice; Distributive justice; Harm; Damages; Economic Justice; Political science; Distributive property; Legislation; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06814509010138439,"score_gpt":0.3345266294557704,"score_spread":0.266381539354386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213372811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021958455,0.017003639,0.018173613,0.086308345,0.0009504598,0.000033266195,0.000039090988,0.000029763341,0.8555033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9428379,0.0070113745,0.0048072594,0.012651082,0.0019570596,0.00006149203,0.000020588077,0.000029534402,0.030623756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99624974,0.0013565912,0.00008578867,0.00030654733,0.0013561513,0.0006451878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986634,0.0005857632,0.00012617689,0.00012144895,0.0003275771,0.00017554268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029450003,0.00027958732,0.00038603213,0.002630644,0.013329249,0.0093236435,0.0016471196,0.0063582123,0.0035051939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030545187,0.00026392261,0.00031842396,0.0023051812,0.060677633,0.005615141,0.003242696,0.0069230944,0.00041492877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.49298e-7,0.00000376253,0.00003057298,0.000004256176,3.080577e-7,0.000019023682,0.0011237313,0.00003883774,0.000011080913,0.99704844,0.00086768257,0.00085142767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007179515,0.000011846302,0.00031937452,0.00008403687,0.0000019047854,0.00007688393,0.0022175687,0.00022246572,0.000044305016,0.9165737,0.0804286,0.000012148504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08653066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09441677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08653066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023971627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009831921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17392713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218074896","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003957","title":"Justice and Responsibility","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Economic Justice; Moral responsibility; Power (physics); Law and economics; Distributive justice; Collective responsibility; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04853700383529322,"score_gpt":0.2920217010822336,"score_spread":0.24348469724694036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218074896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014655073,0.0060218507,0.044601962,0.11120347,0.0009696814,0.00007994342,0.000054549804,0.00006690788,0.8223465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91178817,0.0032438487,0.0069549223,0.023543378,0.0010286289,0.00018762815,0.000038321774,0.00006736529,0.05314772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902914,0.004012321,0.0004516085,0.0015526664,0.0020976255,0.0015942195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954845,0.0021687325,0.0005495172,0.00064060243,0.00057570735,0.0005809674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068497276,0.00049396715,0.000589313,0.0011909164,0.008497665,0.008616346,0.0013964581,0.008260915,0.007023532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010996211,0.0003080293,0.0007895247,0.0007455983,0.05332078,0.010656843,0.009136505,0.0069393576,0.0010769807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014881449,0.0000029883106,0.00007823075,0.0000066999705,0.0000014550465,0.000016397884,0.0008447266,0.000040736926,0.000015278722,0.9967295,0.0011070911,0.0011554155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005764349,0.000009263662,0.00021044044,0.000064447944,0.000003926344,0.00008681753,0.000776547,0.00014346467,0.00007808739,0.9374994,0.061113946,0.000007731345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009782823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006618364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009782823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070804567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007498509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051372528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2233137974","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000400","title":"Federalism and Secession: At Home and Abroad","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Federalism; Autonomy; Legitimacy; Indigenous; Democracy; Political science; Diversity (politics); Self-determination; Government (linguistics); Mobilization; Territorial integrity; Political economy; Democratic legitimacy; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Sovereignty; Politics","score_opus":0.012528488669966234,"score_gpt":0.28717934323506317,"score_spread":0.2746508545650969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2233137974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2250143,0.0050481977,0.003440568,0.030657932,0.00028828942,0.000013491348,0.000046984638,0.00003483822,0.73545545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875914,0.0008493983,0.00027699527,0.0010589237,0.00009009288,0.000009471553,0.000021849517,0.000013266969,0.010088789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987643,0.0006117576,0.000036321617,0.00011875251,0.00014122842,0.0003276533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990613,0.00039735492,0.00013532385,0.00013604021,0.00010456001,0.00016548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012807205,0.00010176085,0.000293693,0.0008075197,0.0040477696,0.007312903,0.00039915415,0.0020019552,0.0076669483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021933226,0.00015744887,0.0003135997,0.0010054422,0.012407326,0.0051666303,0.0032852134,0.0033686499,0.00043087674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019038303,0.000020040761,0.0016008179,0.000014420811,0.0000039839224,0.00013241959,0.0077438815,0.00007512824,0.000090364774,0.98168856,0.0018015523,0.00680975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007177636,0.00010736708,0.021023547,0.0007891362,0.00005943947,0.000772332,0.050174065,0.0012146062,0.00096558675,0.73998046,0.18479235,0.000049405513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074523394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007919687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99254763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029878945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017614898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025648475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252680423","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004173","title":"Dignity and Membership, Equality and Egalitarianism: Economic Rights and Section 15","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Egalitarianism; Rhetorical question; Law and economics; Appeal; Equity (law); Political science; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02709716758799447,"score_gpt":0.2927739755742289,"score_spread":0.26567680798623444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252680423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03841316,0.01128923,0.031217119,0.12107603,0.0012336024,0.000083609644,0.00009040652,0.000064272615,0.7965325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9116908,0.002637395,0.007871859,0.025741467,0.0007165526,0.0001796382,0.000048439008,0.00006534282,0.051048554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909841,0.0038883192,0.00037242557,0.0009487112,0.002469501,0.0013368807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940767,0.0038978062,0.000517729,0.0004950502,0.00071372156,0.00029895036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011735672,0.00049796,0.0005096518,0.0011801583,0.0072457897,0.008821589,0.0020553882,0.007516456,0.006012691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012478876,0.00033482333,0.0006265873,0.0011451631,0.05818682,0.012784571,0.007838614,0.008679784,0.000556708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019993588,0.0000016888536,0.00003871526,0.0000060698762,7.988268e-7,0.000012284358,0.0010862562,0.000023147415,0.000013483456,0.9973908,0.00056186673,0.0008630108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086076325,0.000014038602,0.0003306994,0.00013787442,0.0000056139975,0.0000517909,0.0013404194,0.00019809719,0.00020218467,0.9204771,0.07721688,0.000016732878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03944926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026870117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9605507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0146288965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008182122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106140554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256181194","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000382","title":"From Québec Veto to Québec Secession: The Evolution of the Supreme Court of Canada on Québec-Canada Disputes","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Supreme court; Secession; Political science; Law; Constitution; Framing (construction); Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.00826898085500558,"score_gpt":0.23014013408755704,"score_spread":0.22187115323255147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256181194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33037105,0.012323366,0.0030197613,0.12493862,0.00081866875,0.00010111943,0.0004698239,0.00008363396,0.52787393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9650322,0.0013398143,0.00050682726,0.006703875,0.00007050037,0.000017798327,0.00005409499,0.000037950576,0.026236907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934462,0.0014518403,0.0000996374,0.000708709,0.0017724967,0.002521104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887843,0.0040330254,0.0005608897,0.00032646608,0.0044938177,0.0018015496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005386366,0.00024059654,0.00050132716,0.0025245203,0.031001892,0.018340087,0.00218691,0.006476219,0.01011569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018476432,0.00049824157,0.00039408635,0.0042355433,0.019887302,0.0037922608,0.0037441184,0.0058342717,0.0002907044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007275516,0.0000341101,0.009258814,0.000055660934,0.000033039527,0.00085777737,0.048104607,0.0010192707,0.00042773882,0.8682355,0.04408706,0.027813528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007964944,0.000050231018,0.051919904,0.00058111706,0.0000975435,0.00030828267,0.052288543,0.0027810545,0.0007948994,0.05985916,0.8309275,0.00031202316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99396497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22144781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22144781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16474693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9030102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256463645","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006603","title":"A Rights-Based View of the Idea/ Expression Dichotomy in Copyright Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Public domain; Opposition (politics); Expression (computer science); Law; Relation (database); Law and economics; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Copyright law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Intellectual property; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.018813544979896936,"score_gpt":0.22587024949248558,"score_spread":0.20705670451258865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256463645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031601913,0.0035531218,0.19435102,0.046825465,0.0005802508,0.00007775925,0.000091158945,0.00013392547,0.72278535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94327176,0.0014894274,0.022145977,0.0030931737,0.0007893842,0.00019810654,0.0000432987,0.000076832526,0.028892076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916774,0.0037482139,0.00035265952,0.0009014331,0.002525852,0.0007944585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99417627,0.0034616266,0.0005002658,0.000975859,0.0005865239,0.00029941602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008363854,0.00047958744,0.0004967701,0.0024455634,0.0046611987,0.013977119,0.002147979,0.0075234054,0.005646624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00955544,0.00046177776,0.00080510636,0.0014728702,0.06709836,0.021233335,0.0058378354,0.007728064,0.00095374667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011837635,0.0000019986653,0.000010539767,0.0000026259581,3.0436024e-7,0.000007675489,0.00030102572,0.000037669342,0.00001789366,0.9991999,0.00008379144,0.00033542447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005897141,0.0000053937097,0.000038243972,0.000021304842,0.0000016126055,0.000026705522,0.0002002164,0.00026628276,0.00010344758,0.99175113,0.007575681,0.000004109521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016321345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012093437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013977119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055140466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041743554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044232845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256615650","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006615","title":"Existence and Justification Conditions of Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Morality; Legal positivism; Law; Value (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Legal realism; Philosophy; Legal profession; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.04854953337624345,"score_gpt":0.23808984571901748,"score_spread":0.18954031234277402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256615650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03547703,0.0038530265,0.11034785,0.029411146,0.0008364585,0.00024185606,0.00047877728,0.00022481804,0.81912905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91928416,0.0019390612,0.04745775,0.002866974,0.0010347194,0.0007040639,0.00049499824,0.00012513653,0.026093114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859569,0.003943065,0.0011947731,0.0034570158,0.0037305413,0.0017177272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812351,0.010337595,0.0014973772,0.0023214933,0.0036463419,0.00096205703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011666639,0.00043185172,0.0010143225,0.0034681037,0.005853728,0.009696056,0.0014949768,0.0065768366,0.011836907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022740116,0.00076943514,0.001286559,0.001193762,0.03250236,0.013593239,0.006039462,0.008131048,0.0017747222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018095744,0.000003994041,0.00007338383,0.000011385237,0.000001569528,0.0000091380225,0.00014802256,0.0000404398,0.000039665723,0.99850863,0.00033347923,0.0008284133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020021624,0.000008650776,0.0002824494,0.00006713107,0.000006593684,0.000052443822,0.00024027357,0.0004617172,0.0002464061,0.97895324,0.019649081,0.000012040059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026551397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022441435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011836907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056921784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00796667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061699808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256869429","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004215","title":"Property, Corrective Justice, and the Nature of the Cause of Action in Unjust Enrichment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Action (physics); Restitution; Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.026146688250142158,"score_gpt":0.3315620764756276,"score_spread":0.3054153882254854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256869429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093112156,0.0041768984,0.22275624,0.044323556,0.00052131154,0.00018351765,0.000081246886,0.00019338811,0.6346516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98122233,0.00046558338,0.009266108,0.0021563834,0.00011007059,0.00009607727,0.000018795767,0.00004152118,0.006623152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928982,0.0028702945,0.00032348302,0.001126581,0.0016783206,0.0011030895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914278,0.0052654925,0.00093175675,0.0013498899,0.0007024976,0.00032251544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007866667,0.00042767506,0.00073165155,0.0016815877,0.004222253,0.005361628,0.0015126863,0.004292113,0.003620309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010185813,0.0003608471,0.001004949,0.000872272,0.053691126,0.010131693,0.005759154,0.0050077606,0.00020886617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034007178,0.0000052718183,0.0001821091,0.000015078001,0.000003049928,0.000036204336,0.0005614477,0.00015838354,0.000043484044,0.99767786,0.00013340474,0.0011804829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005087341,0.000009945496,0.0004960367,0.000043786687,0.0000064007572,0.000058584905,0.0004574391,0.00031707328,0.00020090904,0.99074465,0.0076515735,0.000008518101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00400407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046005496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007866667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042946916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004417044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041603386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258055179","doi":"10.1017/s084182090000237x","title":"Should Any Court Accept the “Social Authority” Paradigm?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Resolution (logic); Law; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Computer security","score_opus":0.1076789380825444,"score_gpt":0.4200297274548881,"score_spread":0.3123507893723437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258055179","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068248124,0.0014573762,0.015884634,0.8301145,0.0021455162,0.00008586584,0.00005005712,0.000074828116,0.14336249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52033955,0.0018875881,0.00878622,0.42495924,0.007823372,0.0004548649,0.00008284432,0.00013211255,0.035534147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96308476,0.013032088,0.0014657478,0.0044698543,0.01271798,0.005229633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9675088,0.0171151,0.001901538,0.0025406422,0.008384568,0.0025492767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04079913,0.0005661678,0.0012429008,0.0022134464,0.014718493,0.018204937,0.00570906,0.040424522,0.0075755375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08828955,0.0004977949,0.0015886887,0.0018371415,0.04639913,0.021485494,0.008252649,0.027737517,0.002459083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061170267,0.0000128340425,0.00020978908,0.00001614437,0.0000066053717,0.0000641272,0.0009090229,0.000114809,0.000039418657,0.9817253,0.013498329,0.0033974655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038543203,0.000018445902,0.00024364793,0.00009461245,0.000009111515,0.000047619702,0.0010402269,0.00043093762,0.000085629996,0.9256208,0.0723463,0.00002409928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026354214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025450382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04079913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010246547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022001227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.215769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258189201","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004872","title":"What can Kant Teach Us about Legal Classification?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Focus (optics); Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.025079288045823062,"score_gpt":0.32102443089366073,"score_spread":0.2959451428478377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258189201","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019550694,0.02754213,0.08155359,0.50317454,0.0028557426,0.000032714812,0.00015574995,0.00024553057,0.36488938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9002366,0.014016483,0.029900331,0.030672038,0.0032750124,0.00014567866,0.00013383047,0.0001716953,0.021448411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99260336,0.0047085513,0.00020599132,0.0005749482,0.0012869161,0.0006202468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940428,0.0038804233,0.00042111374,0.00074595865,0.0005857139,0.00032386207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006929556,0.0006965924,0.0009311674,0.0026859,0.007185129,0.010841165,0.001551073,0.0053634564,0.0035173649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00935574,0.00047135295,0.00078276935,0.0021796331,0.052667875,0.020996828,0.0036810979,0.0090184165,0.0012628447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028177674,0.0000021470266,0.000058409256,0.000011968827,0.0000015378313,0.000004711939,0.00097240286,0.00006681178,0.000006952366,0.99434197,0.0021782112,0.0023520114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002674325,0.000003134616,0.000057155492,0.000039742525,0.0000013991635,0.000010063512,0.00053103606,0.00014159644,0.000024543668,0.97524923,0.023934424,0.0000050149238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074114418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052972874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010841165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009078184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004334168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065867186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261418248","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003593","title":"Resituating the Judicialization of Politics: Bush v. Gore as a Global Trend","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Political science; Polity; Presidency; Supreme court; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.03707364720469677,"score_gpt":0.3043663065438004,"score_spread":0.2672926593391037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261418248","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16924107,0.011511703,0.0013270358,0.4277789,0.0016754888,0.000042580396,0.000094717,0.000041622035,0.38828686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9051148,0.0020971252,0.00044538817,0.06819744,0.0005437311,0.000029543247,0.000026447162,0.000052677686,0.023492856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970298,0.0011248249,0.00006955438,0.00038265347,0.00041911993,0.000974102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728787,0.0014969027,0.0002181245,0.00022266644,0.00032916287,0.00044522164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004931497,0.00023451405,0.00035148868,0.0010893709,0.007783172,0.008673587,0.00077221583,0.007974656,0.003413076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008141334,0.00021102928,0.00033941356,0.0013634922,0.016330076,0.0060849297,0.004626998,0.009445712,0.00030245795],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003941888,0.000020936744,0.0018987727,0.00004430589,0.0000105492445,0.0005840065,0.017499864,0.0001144082,0.00052419043,0.92682153,0.038984362,0.013457627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111094356,0.00008402059,0.013215614,0.00045441338,0.00009199212,0.0004921324,0.03791659,0.00045474633,0.0017140503,0.2887093,0.6566675,0.00008860272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048328687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15557824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048328687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057624094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007445863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09609479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262938555","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004264","title":"The Religious Beliefs of Tort Victims: Religious Thin Skulls or Failures of Mitigation?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Argument (complex analysis); Tort; Religious freedom; Witness; Law; Accident (philosophy); Psychology; Forensic engineering; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine; Engineering; Philosophy; Liability; Epistemology","score_opus":0.015367179004416462,"score_gpt":0.3090928702814286,"score_spread":0.29372569127701215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262938555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84746665,0.0024623822,0.00095745496,0.094791666,0.00024944748,0.000053613836,0.00003172685,0.000010216759,0.05397696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99499655,0.00047610115,0.000113271635,0.0037769747,0.00004614172,0.0000069268212,0.00000425177,0.0000022909837,0.00057737384],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966972,0.0015556514,0.000095899864,0.00017238173,0.00065285276,0.000826036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934835,0.002782781,0.0018947981,0.0005660198,0.0005802413,0.0006927576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004820007,0.000329526,0.00048884144,0.0016978913,0.0077950796,0.0049344366,0.0017667767,0.004466628,0.0029469584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020064024,0.00037072413,0.0003289554,0.0011542015,0.04578174,0.0064453296,0.0045507923,0.005368577,0.0001936765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050384566,0.00013643916,0.025237622,0.00007490944,0.000023567274,0.001144022,0.73195326,0.000047001984,0.00024125457,0.22157592,0.003563465,0.015952244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032891552,0.00005818355,0.02551464,0.00036476686,0.0000350539,0.0012495434,0.9025614,0.00021878081,0.0002388414,0.05335842,0.01631873,0.000048790436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059646837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06636948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94035316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044697314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005035562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118599296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263605963","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004008","title":"Jurisprudence as a Moral and Historical Inquiry","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Archetype; Universality (dynamical systems); Jurisprudence; Realm; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Value theory; Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.044499790616415895,"score_gpt":0.3090017325874035,"score_spread":0.2645019419709876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263605963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020654427,0.056251217,0.014031089,0.14846304,0.0022086035,0.000049495357,0.000040453066,0.0000458357,0.7582558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94017625,0.014710741,0.0042684097,0.009567635,0.0021609743,0.00012312878,0.000034438308,0.00008946309,0.02886888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828744,0.010863029,0.00038732548,0.0016590432,0.0030678958,0.0011481987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98689747,0.009090072,0.00068068766,0.0010047562,0.001298826,0.0010281048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011861434,0.00053987367,0.00092703773,0.0037382164,0.017451877,0.017591694,0.0026330962,0.0072703552,0.0024351962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01716102,0.0005922347,0.00042086357,0.00388892,0.12969825,0.01285888,0.006579734,0.013074428,0.00042534535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.734333e-7,0.000003033467,0.00001980185,0.000005896742,5.0887e-7,0.000019784273,0.0037070408,0.00003379151,0.000007821277,0.9950917,0.00045007034,0.00065993983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055447535,0.00001092596,0.00016867055,0.00017474736,0.0000016049103,0.00009678558,0.007897134,0.00023220864,0.00004099938,0.77565426,0.21570888,0.000008183665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015113443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0111907665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025139177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025139177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012930389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18239832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264591406","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000424","title":"Toward a Proceduralist Theory of Secession","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Legitimacy; Clearance; Political science; Politics; Miller; Law; Privilege (computing); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.029725538297608434,"score_gpt":0.30195910412888305,"score_spread":0.2722335658312746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264591406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013895334,0.0018743358,0.43265617,0.106996976,0.00072858925,0.00013550013,0.00017556404,0.00020051419,0.44333705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74931335,0.0029954398,0.15968291,0.018327694,0.002472307,0.000851803,0.00027578537,0.00035013375,0.06573049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938524,0.0033095155,0.0002015156,0.00057178066,0.0016130728,0.00045175702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948448,0.002348813,0.00044147205,0.00092402514,0.0010826825,0.0003581403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010584402,0.00052481616,0.0006170577,0.002201225,0.0036962056,0.010208529,0.0029026153,0.005380866,0.0041479217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007032037,0.0005570865,0.0012009982,0.0015319386,0.032849133,0.0104647,0.0031721715,0.012722007,0.0013040564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.753348e-7,0.0000033516426,0.000015687268,0.0000026535479,5.3421024e-7,0.0000045377396,0.00023087737,0.000110150424,0.000012113513,0.9989497,0.00028757742,0.00038226217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004893969,0.0000040279733,0.00004088489,0.000016713297,0.0000015220104,0.000009332873,0.00013357146,0.000751135,0.000031442683,0.9867578,0.012245594,0.0000030918554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004572093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004251483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010584402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00613346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008180475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05597633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269871599","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000515","title":"The Social Character of Freedom of Expression","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Adjudication; Ideal (ethics); Political science; Politics; Constitutional right; Freedom of expression; Law; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; State (computer science); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Human rights; Constitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.024448892214476513,"score_gpt":0.2917098771888187,"score_spread":0.2672609849743422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269871599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0135970395,0.009664119,0.0098847,0.11248604,0.00089643034,0.00004885357,0.00009028908,0.0000530257,0.85327953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8463347,0.0052098758,0.0032106622,0.016665626,0.00071843,0.000093479,0.00008447129,0.00007964951,0.12760314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923139,0.0026934696,0.00017608741,0.0008507426,0.0023873425,0.0015783682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970831,0.0013527384,0.00015540454,0.00032107686,0.00075811683,0.00032963554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045633838,0.00042348108,0.0004253249,0.0012428097,0.011659993,0.011311317,0.0009778677,0.003635669,0.005020378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057353294,0.0002628684,0.0005249012,0.001134691,0.07273056,0.006392663,0.004451111,0.004643512,0.00068220077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031632212,0.0000017453348,0.00005320697,0.0000073690117,0.000001479953,0.000020103907,0.0028432664,0.000049015667,0.000051171715,0.99041593,0.0043846867,0.0021687844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012138565,0.000010181068,0.0007985903,0.000098192744,0.0000064226015,0.00007614902,0.0036402538,0.00023849371,0.00026485705,0.5985751,0.3962436,0.0000359861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32165357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2816109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32165357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020548873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014555448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6395627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271109635","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003908","title":"How the New ICTs Matter to the Theory of Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Legal positivism; Positivism; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Allegiance; Sociology; Legal profession; Law and economics; Legal realism","score_opus":0.019784844106262117,"score_gpt":0.26392726989390525,"score_spread":0.24414242578764314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271109635","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038100895,0.046687726,0.03530143,0.5258121,0.0020972479,0.000049012702,0.0001698051,0.0001234328,0.3516585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9363652,0.019224804,0.007949837,0.020120094,0.002816281,0.000121146084,0.00009031225,0.00008509154,0.013227418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99017954,0.005724478,0.0002439008,0.0012291907,0.001775106,0.0008478985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98283374,0.012444529,0.00078464363,0.0014652524,0.001424989,0.001046904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010330746,0.00047068304,0.0008532018,0.0033700222,0.004827515,0.014946285,0.0020095205,0.007205168,0.0051317126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017692905,0.00057223096,0.00083344744,0.0021009264,0.08082809,0.024378626,0.0038495355,0.010143507,0.0008188191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030666308,0.000006666891,0.00010891676,0.000017685417,0.0000027370313,0.000016053935,0.00059683,0.00019715582,0.000009750502,0.9967809,0.00080794154,0.0014522845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057034067,0.0000043067676,0.00014001266,0.000047243306,0.0000031989246,0.000015621978,0.000407109,0.00031985802,0.000017854865,0.98607963,0.012953404,0.0000060387347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017086767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069270893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017086767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011105379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062220204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080575526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271604228","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003994","title":"Constitutions as Living Trees: An Idiot Defends","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Idiot; Law; Sociology; Tree of life (biology); Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.03350669052369158,"score_gpt":0.3190390909449404,"score_spread":0.2855324004212488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271604228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038621135,0.0046346453,0.18037239,0.059845243,0.0011543857,0.00013932175,0.00017225232,0.0002615349,0.71479905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92217,0.002307316,0.031878375,0.007101763,0.0010458436,0.00034529582,0.00011375315,0.00025760024,0.034780044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918142,0.00429665,0.00021734954,0.00096895284,0.001964081,0.00073872803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941373,0.0036908418,0.00050599716,0.00088897045,0.00054689334,0.00022994596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075731655,0.00042782634,0.0005358005,0.0026638997,0.0070970873,0.010785925,0.0016409314,0.0055957483,0.004430201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010819877,0.00039962222,0.00063679816,0.002005758,0.046371277,0.015946748,0.0048452783,0.007823066,0.0008295781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.8919263e-7,8.630837e-7,0.000014968781,0.0000018553393,3.001456e-7,0.0000040988925,0.00063403277,0.000036942813,0.00000863822,0.99846494,0.00033239526,0.0005004384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009490676,0.00000709687,0.00008924169,0.000037297206,0.0000033546683,0.000031754196,0.0010217947,0.00051794166,0.00010229531,0.91653055,0.08164103,0.000008103759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006131126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066892416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004231439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042603016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04005122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272219748","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002460","title":"Unconstitutionality, Invalidity, and Charter Challenges","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Morality; Positivism; Legal positivism; Law; Duty; Political science; Politics; Constitutionality; Sociology; Law and economics; Constitution; Legal realism; Legal profession","score_opus":0.11902694100008154,"score_gpt":0.3161608745964075,"score_spread":0.19713393359632597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272219748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15263619,0.0041406737,0.03987685,0.1886705,0.0008940507,0.00012501498,0.00012445124,0.00012709657,0.6134051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976008,0.0006222189,0.0038655237,0.0089672785,0.00025431064,0.0000832947,0.000031590745,0.000042453354,0.010125235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9633275,0.012134155,0.001432645,0.004533481,0.013284754,0.0052874153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96718866,0.016322294,0.002459572,0.0042093345,0.008015392,0.0018047863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02576202,0.00040770948,0.0012477939,0.0022246777,0.018131085,0.01446449,0.0035194329,0.008394937,0.0022130453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04739202,0.00056635536,0.00096961844,0.0016916541,0.077921465,0.010264276,0.010590511,0.014054162,0.00024668354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004086112,0.0000066239068,0.00031992834,0.0000076155243,0.0000028512359,0.000061155144,0.0030149755,0.00009529092,0.00002672473,0.9935895,0.0010282131,0.0018429789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015538808,0.000008491016,0.0005878505,0.00006952968,0.000014421448,0.00009653774,0.0023793986,0.00058516534,0.00020684967,0.96529293,0.030719036,0.000024174078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10976524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10104444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89023477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024439512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041755755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21825266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279373688","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006305","title":"In Defence of Reconciliation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Indigenous; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Colonialism; Neocolonialism; Political economy; Doctrine; State (computer science); Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.016606420934997163,"score_gpt":0.2968984406756334,"score_spread":0.2802920197406363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279373688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008361232,0.009015537,0.023167927,0.14666075,0.00392731,0.000100787904,0.00005422089,0.00024661398,0.80846554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6720489,0.0034696998,0.010725487,0.06146169,0.0028508245,0.0003453229,0.00012141908,0.000339047,0.24863757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766209,0.011505633,0.0008833953,0.0028176492,0.005381651,0.0027908087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905255,0.0033270472,0.0009590375,0.0025399087,0.0020024977,0.0006459624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015840461,0.0008378844,0.0009105631,0.0019717144,0.010720396,0.015169823,0.0037015858,0.011709387,0.00828376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02031701,0.0004309398,0.0011565259,0.0017516363,0.06157388,0.011278573,0.016839663,0.017990008,0.002238658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052508535,0.00000400986,0.000057573423,0.000032114433,0.000006212032,0.00004555723,0.005565478,0.000059483707,0.000054396372,0.9824039,0.007536629,0.0042294883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014597573,0.000025678242,0.00020030561,0.00022911862,0.000012410344,0.00023133265,0.005294048,0.00029494843,0.0003925573,0.39400998,0.59927106,0.000023991272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012955066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014213324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98704493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011120676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016355464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083773315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283773878","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004070","title":"Introduction: Global Ethics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.045975997812491336,"score_gpt":0.3455845112431948,"score_spread":0.29960851343070344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283773878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014025181,0.049192585,0.0047099437,0.12667271,0.012385214,0.000060648177,0.0005992729,0.00014014357,0.80483687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1093445,0.054668467,0.005087972,0.097766586,0.023024693,0.00026548802,0.00081726094,0.00036708993,0.70865786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993635,0.00023388583,0.00002069796,0.00011587754,0.00018260199,0.000083379295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994887,0.0002273746,0.000029150144,0.00006007942,0.00012041539,0.00007415387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085100875,0.00061844016,0.0003981252,0.0011143915,0.0017734279,0.0040695444,0.00059366063,0.0034252375,0.039878212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015591587,0.00018003676,0.00043033346,0.0011035674,0.004330883,0.003263273,0.0018165082,0.004019553,0.0085155135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007783257,0.000010375713,0.00011976765,0.00014888491,0.0000028088402,0.000047000016,0.00083642115,0.000134956,0.00008453971,0.65694463,0.32132363,0.020339293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003041178,0.0000056788676,0.00037246905,0.00032297682,0.0000018422803,0.000068392095,0.0003012001,0.00006556931,0.00003449238,0.10660879,0.8922114,0.000004151243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042704195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049055475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039878212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029773829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016710638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13340592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284029674","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004835","title":"Red Tape and Gridlock","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Veto; Object (grammar); Law and economics; Position (finance); Gridlock; Property (philosophy); Power (physics); State (computer science); Business; Original position; Block (permutation group theory); Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law; Politics; Finance; Computer science; Economic Justice; Epistemology","score_opus":0.012847200544364985,"score_gpt":0.27626811032121185,"score_spread":0.26342090977684685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284029674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023704452,0.0045794705,0.009201017,0.033762936,0.0015025054,0.000034588862,0.00015154692,0.00025140244,0.9268121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7501157,0.0032438661,0.0022349134,0.009193729,0.00064950617,0.00009726584,0.00015991738,0.0003395894,0.23396559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810237,0.00073756656,0.000056368848,0.0003483194,0.00032798215,0.00042728745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973423,0.0010786334,0.00020794405,0.0006278839,0.00037962155,0.00036366942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019908196,0.00035583717,0.00038979627,0.0010384866,0.0077159447,0.007578902,0.0012228936,0.0029842928,0.061538592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008039201,0.0002320149,0.00034672665,0.001815859,0.012157571,0.010857908,0.0064632017,0.0042198175,0.0062694037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031145813,0.0000099034105,0.00032020765,0.000032081512,0.0000025560653,0.00011370555,0.0030170232,0.00014301587,0.00004232559,0.9611748,0.021337688,0.013775612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032882916,0.000025195453,0.0006050393,0.00019708254,0.0000067877922,0.0002114139,0.006042038,0.00051123125,0.00022480419,0.37833753,0.61378807,0.000017944132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010097466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012008872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061538592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044393777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022971455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20586711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290919682","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006202","title":"Equality, Assurance and Criminalization","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Argument (complex analysis); Supreme court; Wrongdoing; Equal Protection Clause; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Harm; Jurisprudence; Criminal law; Duty; Due Process Clause; Criminal code; Sociology","score_opus":0.02882209826293836,"score_gpt":0.3114581393830779,"score_spread":0.28263604112013957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290919682","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11775485,0.0072814105,0.019182196,0.0486305,0.00033662797,0.00008126216,0.0000687433,0.000054367356,0.8066101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842668,0.00072948914,0.0010695771,0.0018884856,0.00012993286,0.000035679677,0.000013368986,0.000012531244,0.0118541205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908223,0.0032741956,0.000365962,0.0014391945,0.0019897807,0.0021085683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950193,0.001875874,0.00083789014,0.00085856294,0.00086770725,0.0005406728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006351907,0.0003408078,0.0005494129,0.0012495803,0.008032629,0.0066043683,0.0009350935,0.0033572593,0.003891034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012247764,0.00026446697,0.0004266605,0.0008529823,0.062932804,0.006289747,0.007886084,0.004783013,0.0003677841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002591516,0.000003697135,0.00020221762,0.000005041596,0.0000012407188,0.000012948797,0.0009636394,0.000052943393,0.000017654083,0.99663204,0.00037606322,0.0017298957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010420341,0.000017869424,0.0012486482,0.000065875975,0.000006943178,0.000058112957,0.00096963753,0.00026325352,0.00017552661,0.97030747,0.02686592,0.000010353319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03142588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016293785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9685741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008339196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070668263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062485933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297086725","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004227","title":"The Authority of Law in the Circumstances of Politics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Politics; Norm (philosophy); Law; Political authority; Primary authority; Political science; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Public authority; Sociology; Legal research","score_opus":0.060085594575824575,"score_gpt":0.3610193666428287,"score_spread":0.3009337720670041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297086725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08788747,0.007675016,0.05100896,0.07054213,0.0005451117,0.00007092609,0.00010551108,0.00007953518,0.7820853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99032754,0.0011638972,0.0023990402,0.0014334267,0.00028740478,0.00004207017,0.000020280731,0.000027835975,0.004298503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879736,0.0074200225,0.0004011052,0.0010358469,0.0019162861,0.0012531215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918351,0.0047817184,0.0008119941,0.0010156771,0.00089512236,0.00066027493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008738653,0.0002997075,0.00057100377,0.002153956,0.0077310563,0.009624534,0.000986112,0.0033342044,0.0023647714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013450027,0.000471925,0.00070291193,0.0013125569,0.04803807,0.01178124,0.0052746874,0.005047835,0.00047154573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029563596,0.0000017675635,0.00015389024,0.0000049905393,9.804835e-7,0.000023029237,0.0012966197,0.00008119343,0.000024377878,0.99758756,0.00033334384,0.0004892415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075497455,0.0000048105762,0.00033226848,0.00003318576,0.0000037112784,0.000040214516,0.0012467171,0.00025223472,0.000051143626,0.9760818,0.021939497,0.000006832286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059737405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049525425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009624534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004884956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039027503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04621494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336035430","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2015.28","title":"Functional and Existential Authorities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.14467859802726488,"score_gpt":0.3436608182073961,"score_spread":0.1989822201801312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336035430","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07814114,0.0034512256,0.10271469,0.016383497,0.00045966054,0.00009209919,0.00011701145,0.00017649894,0.79846424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827214,0.0006084442,0.0050701103,0.0006934412,0.00013097795,0.000050427345,0.000038050362,0.00005292523,0.0106342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925014,0.003563986,0.0003536286,0.0010660689,0.0015301609,0.0009847652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962423,0.0015002262,0.00041401444,0.00076407957,0.00059914234,0.00048028622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005012607,0.000501955,0.00043229922,0.0019556354,0.005142862,0.0075379354,0.0010532793,0.0024422167,0.004782044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077970596,0.00032903222,0.0006337732,0.0011075379,0.05008757,0.01234226,0.0079401685,0.0035037831,0.0006624085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014267074,0.0000011881499,0.00008040873,0.0000070278065,9.514749e-7,0.000013148605,0.0020604818,0.000035710404,0.00002879766,0.9968303,0.00015064869,0.00078989915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008030535,0.000017384826,0.0004542288,0.00011445527,0.000010358278,0.00017457489,0.0049690874,0.00049146975,0.00016360366,0.9255376,0.0680437,0.000015491449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032409118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023490554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075379354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004132834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033819203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029985964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338217353","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002393","title":"Making Inclusive Positivism Compatible with Razian Authority","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Positivism; Legal positivism; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Morality; Order (exchange); Universal law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Economics","score_opus":0.03135342173081904,"score_gpt":0.3331496247278377,"score_spread":0.3017962029970187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338217353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11207046,0.0013533859,0.20497783,0.052276984,0.00069662114,0.00013970849,0.000084608364,0.00021605277,0.6281843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96700436,0.0003065873,0.02121952,0.0018515113,0.00014956428,0.00011210942,0.000027189433,0.000054288626,0.009274921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99103045,0.004523321,0.0004669571,0.0010727105,0.0020919105,0.0008145562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99087244,0.0038649663,0.00093186466,0.00187457,0.0016225503,0.00083363015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010798449,0.00041880668,0.0006000123,0.0013812832,0.0041669523,0.007897063,0.0012916722,0.0025197493,0.0035287165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016762652,0.0004401523,0.0009530985,0.00066360657,0.02597128,0.013135375,0.0096137095,0.0053850044,0.00074101135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067447654,0.000006235771,0.0001139062,0.000007159956,0.0000021453725,0.000028704713,0.0013426231,0.00009565026,0.000078924306,0.99659663,0.00030492243,0.0014163634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000135830805,0.000008877776,0.00012636113,0.000019933208,0.000005668981,0.000026487869,0.00047929864,0.0005156041,0.00015428232,0.9882917,0.010351766,0.000006557564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026826207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035019042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010798449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004677263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004446123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057108343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W236800487","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004847","title":"Improperly Collected Taxes: The Border Between Private and Public Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Doctrine; Restitution; Law; Political science; Normative; Private law; Constitutional law; Public law; Legal doctrine; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02420793817266316,"score_gpt":0.3110538842295081,"score_spread":0.28684594605684494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W236800487","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24268506,0.011647012,0.07893563,0.1470463,0.00063566957,0.000072827446,0.00012626995,0.00015821151,0.51869303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881015,0.0012653716,0.0024680858,0.0035902422,0.00019588752,0.00002570551,0.000014824749,0.000028103443,0.0043103066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913914,0.0024023654,0.00040677865,0.0013263111,0.0035050781,0.00096800324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99205,0.0043967147,0.00093405467,0.0013504305,0.0008887052,0.00038012638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006285052,0.00019928743,0.0007264048,0.0017727797,0.006277486,0.013572334,0.0013974247,0.005162725,0.0025685239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0130014345,0.00038654287,0.0005980312,0.002108017,0.042585403,0.016366784,0.0059085283,0.009002037,0.0003148603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028297734,0.0000047716217,0.00012994662,0.000004111987,7.887993e-7,0.0000148364015,0.0005452911,0.000043224125,0.000023292172,0.9973367,0.00034019357,0.0015540612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008033053,0.000009260583,0.0006533318,0.000080850274,0.0000049658697,0.00007887952,0.0012490461,0.00050194765,0.00021328001,0.9784696,0.018719403,0.000011461869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012605467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011846851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013572334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010642384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010822179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07721621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W238538938","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003623","title":"Gender Performance, Sexual Subjects and International Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; International law; Law; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.06056175362656408,"score_gpt":0.28911831281038336,"score_spread":0.22855655918381929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W238538938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09881865,0.024230447,0.0018427523,0.033527713,0.0009286531,0.000017176028,0.00004083999,0.000016489175,0.84057724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96599936,0.0077292505,0.00024636477,0.0025888078,0.0005494649,0.000020759364,0.000015566502,0.000019624602,0.02283083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982146,0.0010350248,0.000035014968,0.00012305383,0.00027011847,0.00032229116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988225,0.0007679837,0.0001416971,0.000054439013,0.000085929045,0.00012738755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00238921,0.00039636242,0.00029635662,0.0013551125,0.0063046454,0.008739838,0.0004891092,0.0021257882,0.004980835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004080515,0.00011847598,0.00018955595,0.0019831595,0.039099067,0.003796484,0.0031109508,0.0021046826,0.0002767697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008346014,0.00000905858,0.0011882487,0.000017257116,0.0000015981157,0.00007008555,0.025641538,0.0000333996,0.00006790437,0.9639993,0.0022714054,0.006691828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014486045,0.000085127445,0.008108372,0.0004585555,0.000011077239,0.00030098052,0.11582098,0.00015345564,0.00032458038,0.49533615,0.37936035,0.00002589386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013485627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019228427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013485627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003001793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027710723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026814282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461290031","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002496","title":"In Pursuit of Pragmatic Legal Theory","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Legal positivism; Epistemology; Tort; Positivism; Economic Justice; Principal (computer security); Sociology; Legal formalism; Legal realism; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Legal research; Comparative law; Black letter law; Computer science","score_opus":0.034640150205082126,"score_gpt":0.3431281907909138,"score_spread":0.3084880405858317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461290031","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034778933,0.30991927,0.022264035,0.49475735,0.0058927163,0.00007337773,0.000058768223,0.00004824047,0.16350834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46289617,0.29579824,0.025236458,0.12859458,0.025750209,0.00068279065,0.00020058086,0.00033013034,0.060510926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864162,0.008449854,0.0003618653,0.00094979163,0.003241153,0.00058115885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985441,0.010675947,0.00057477265,0.0006899147,0.0022261962,0.00039212432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012408619,0.00064982113,0.00087017834,0.004066996,0.005062503,0.009250442,0.0016449741,0.006901848,0.0036439884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02353697,0.00040303773,0.00070992444,0.0035931945,0.03421558,0.016153721,0.003834807,0.0086487755,0.00093313016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048886873,0.000007006823,0.0000418915,0.00018402541,0.0000043826344,0.00003885123,0.0021755171,0.00010661874,0.000037835023,0.9584929,0.028182913,0.01072318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008287512,0.000009822066,0.00018675708,0.00080096227,0.000004657913,0.000089084715,0.0020341126,0.00025105185,0.000066679066,0.6300724,0.36646503,0.000011121097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00752113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008376725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012408619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010293886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010157885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07468772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475997088","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004525","title":"Uneasy Partners: Multiculturalism and Rights in Canada by Janice Gross Stein, David Robertson Cameron, John Ibbitson, Will Kymlicka, John Meisel, Haroon Siddiqui, and Michael Valpy, (Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2007); xiii + 165 pp. Paper ISBN: 1-55458-012-9, ISBN 13: 978-1-55458-012-5. Numbers in parentheses are page references to this work, except where indicated.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Multiculturalism; Politics; Economic Justice; Law; Supreme court; Sociology; Religious studies; Media studies; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01419317649905062,"score_gpt":0.21803967408488784,"score_spread":0.20384649758583723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475997088","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01666053,0.3870829,0.0006071005,0.40155476,0.0083896,0.00006356636,0.00044019104,0.00005852529,0.18514276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3914024,0.28213623,0.0014452203,0.045387752,0.0027947545,0.00008400411,0.00044596315,0.00025001357,0.27605364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731797,0.00046285486,0.000048822527,0.00022238263,0.0013832805,0.0005646021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967128,0.0007821429,0.00017231968,0.000087376175,0.0014436711,0.00080181996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00203934,0.0008859142,0.0005538883,0.0025490494,0.025627008,0.015949868,0.0014367172,0.002279695,0.005395542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00426474,0.00044547423,0.00025709785,0.006434385,0.01667886,0.0045133666,0.0030204928,0.004958275,0.000834889],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029491244,0.000019611147,0.0018070185,0.00033419646,0.000018325138,0.00047033106,0.061330132,0.00021070866,0.00014874687,0.12692562,0.77070177,0.038004085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033947308,0.000002974054,0.0033947537,0.0005979862,0.000009117553,0.000115200135,0.035514425,0.00006728465,0.00006939058,0.0071129207,0.95308393,0.000028658358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98318005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99278426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104132295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.104132295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1556532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7555362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476423704","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004471","title":"<i>Discussion</i>Foucault, Agamben, and Arbour J.’s Dissent in<i>Gosselin</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Charter; Law; Supreme court; Political science; State (computer science); Human rights; Legislation; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.028910219776783187,"score_gpt":0.2999339519642602,"score_spread":0.271023732187477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476423704","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012501645,0.00579706,0.0002500038,0.95997673,0.00631199,0.00001621806,0.00010586796,0.00001614065,0.0262759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035400983,0.003187024,0.00047085193,0.93248934,0.007688339,0.0000635444,0.00004919471,0.000042900283,0.020607758],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876815,0.0035001086,0.00030624395,0.0019558582,0.0037144276,0.0028419544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99127734,0.0047289003,0.00029512614,0.00025870366,0.0022800353,0.0011599597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01094674,0.00079761114,0.000989765,0.0016971639,0.023488926,0.013152818,0.008343377,0.026982822,0.0073449714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015640888,0.00045204046,0.0017197978,0.001811661,0.032119203,0.007333702,0.0041108895,0.028860701,0.0018131144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016451926,0.000019668363,0.00031611117,0.000092016926,0.000010459366,0.00027159962,0.008815783,0.00008394096,0.00017430448,0.19869518,0.7864099,0.0050945943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014796032,0.000009105769,0.0014078325,0.00067686086,0.00001026048,0.00010644773,0.015415527,0.00011283811,0.0002807527,0.03982824,0.9420565,0.00008079303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55003875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58179617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44996125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03749515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028755514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9052223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477902474","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004495","title":"Reality Check: On the Uses of Empiricism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Notice; Law; Principal (computer security); Empiricism; Politics; Majority opinion; Empirical research; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Judicial opinion; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.12448802076700792,"score_gpt":0.3353811908439809,"score_spread":0.21089317007697295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477902474","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015766034,0.12889554,0.11124489,0.5166369,0.008485454,0.00018561476,0.00069915823,0.00052293716,0.21756348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78240937,0.04083979,0.072667524,0.07013194,0.01351833,0.0005179556,0.00059422705,0.0007541695,0.018566798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9497638,0.038647506,0.0012520242,0.00238469,0.006659115,0.001293031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7745595,0.20143129,0.003365317,0.008778339,0.010656663,0.0012089184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05210793,0.0011703131,0.0022851524,0.011995064,0.006669285,0.013260835,0.004694122,0.0037088154,0.006644763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1453516,0.00067452533,0.0014656928,0.0058898847,0.07586266,0.020488799,0.0067726695,0.008840132,0.0009848024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002471347,0.000013251526,0.000750617,0.00015057527,0.00006757863,0.00007883626,0.00327123,0.00040929407,0.000024252578,0.9494374,0.02877693,0.016995342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023850469,0.000021299018,0.0011273887,0.0007212914,0.000022957845,0.000056048262,0.0034124071,0.0013242575,0.00009392908,0.9097255,0.083431154,0.000039924616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033459526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027210357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05210793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010414067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007261629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27557635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482659382","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004380","title":"Censorship, Logocracy and Democracy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Charter; Democracy; Law; Political science; Legislature; Politics; Free speech; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.041191366519729114,"score_gpt":0.28902593959219386,"score_spread":0.24783457307246476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482659382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12519093,0.0036963315,0.012638366,0.055581484,0.00026803985,0.000050338076,0.00006359781,0.00006737644,0.8024435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98558193,0.00054125173,0.00041581216,0.0014129505,0.000066670495,0.000010765769,0.00001026748,0.000008248924,0.011952081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951331,0.0018467779,0.000090580834,0.00047759476,0.0012904267,0.0011614389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929391,0.003787177,0.0009611864,0.0008906621,0.000804164,0.0006176824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042999308,0.00019015986,0.00029818012,0.0012191022,0.009186612,0.007343765,0.0009123586,0.0018389147,0.00409881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007682597,0.00015433041,0.00019370644,0.0012533768,0.062019523,0.0033898929,0.0033367025,0.0030481494,0.00026547443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003094403,0.0000044385424,0.00042732316,0.0000068663785,0.0000012072385,0.000022494609,0.0020039536,0.00008453845,0.000019713494,0.9943374,0.0007024881,0.0023865344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027516724,0.000022934628,0.0034410933,0.00012842171,0.000010338906,0.00012480245,0.005568448,0.0004939616,0.00033662195,0.85737944,0.13243945,0.000027041875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16795082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19950265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16795082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014436681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017770981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33394647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492403657","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005774","title":"Hate Speech and Pornography in Canada: A Qualified Deontological Response to a Consequentialist Argument","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Pornography; Normative; Sociology; Law; Deontological ethics; Democracy; Identity (music); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Medicine","score_opus":0.02420541552427644,"score_gpt":0.30195516973519826,"score_spread":0.2777497542109218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492403657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19094414,0.0026862496,0.004847195,0.28495905,0.000933088,0.000092204355,0.000186297,0.00006261061,0.5152892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92615783,0.00096563436,0.0007494787,0.029177995,0.00013714378,0.00001999521,0.000031920335,0.00003212112,0.042727966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938216,0.00097414985,0.00009852771,0.00054288935,0.0021110994,0.0024516368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942405,0.0016954837,0.00032050055,0.00021405211,0.0026119782,0.00091747625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036073478,0.00042151383,0.000420648,0.0012786802,0.04423438,0.008339622,0.0022150741,0.008255006,0.0058433115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010261369,0.00041774323,0.0004450892,0.0017647579,0.021682302,0.0030070436,0.0044163084,0.010874559,0.00023886422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029347966,0.000026120377,0.0023059596,0.000040967476,0.000015132186,0.0006373019,0.061456114,0.00028973777,0.0003801386,0.8962025,0.030255342,0.008361419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007749297,0.00004343021,0.022831313,0.0002989192,0.000105790816,0.00038523908,0.14363371,0.002271828,0.0014297698,0.19358325,0.6350529,0.00028633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99026793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10990708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10990708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14667241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7974354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493931398","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004331","title":"Gender, Multiculturalism and Dialogue: The Case of Jewish Divorce","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Judaism; Negotiation; Law; Sociology; Political science; Power (physics); Family law; Civil law (Civil law); Ethnic group; Gender studies; Public law","score_opus":0.05870838004157729,"score_gpt":0.305949515897247,"score_spread":0.2472411358556697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493931398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73991233,0.005127926,0.002034328,0.098106265,0.00066923536,0.00006272802,0.00002094639,0.000027251848,0.15403906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882252,0.0005833631,0.00030750566,0.004767755,0.00007698691,0.000015227359,0.0000039343095,0.00000785748,0.0060120416],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99041766,0.0055248477,0.00011374647,0.00036914795,0.0008898537,0.002684705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954391,0.002595345,0.0002908717,0.00014233936,0.000503429,0.0010289537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009391898,0.00044110656,0.0006686963,0.0011934811,0.06746408,0.007885084,0.0020324606,0.009181874,0.002764413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010420211,0.0004573617,0.00066664733,0.0012758401,0.03927179,0.0045957346,0.009190728,0.009146651,0.00019391747],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000303859,0.00003464481,0.0018666898,0.000025255236,0.000009553645,0.0057561323,0.77384514,0.00006630001,0.00020979012,0.21096493,0.002453025,0.0047381786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048912145,0.00004054542,0.002570352,0.00015446318,0.00003135032,0.0020206792,0.8694408,0.0003890382,0.00035225446,0.029190093,0.09570713,0.000054398857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4329762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5490668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5670238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030783188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020563623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86091197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502850426","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002290","title":"Property as Ontology: On Aboriginal and English Understandings of Ownership","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Epistemology; Relation (database); Categorization; Determinative; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Ontology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.022132277319380663,"score_gpt":0.2966466945513993,"score_spread":0.27451441723201864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502850426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34521848,0.01619542,0.014532616,0.032574195,0.0003245242,0.00006122663,0.000121906356,0.00004291994,0.5909288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856656,0.0020213395,0.0012298813,0.00077238266,0.000052407686,0.000027005299,0.000022562353,0.000029800773,0.01017893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975204,0.0011646404,0.000080434096,0.00021123486,0.00046287818,0.0005604433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975981,0.0013021562,0.00022872622,0.0001928141,0.00045230472,0.00022590696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037296538,0.00039124113,0.00051359873,0.0021870534,0.009308653,0.0071881847,0.0014903878,0.0016980747,0.0026198057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003407611,0.00029176395,0.0004965341,0.0019487239,0.037982117,0.010183827,0.0053166063,0.0033248588,0.00018781265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016147225,0.000009553939,0.00067441893,0.00004826646,0.0000037399745,0.0002277496,0.27550495,0.00008251526,0.00018738762,0.7202432,0.000554129,0.002447946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025704114,0.000055699293,0.006568591,0.00063481054,0.000057653357,0.0006470422,0.37098604,0.0012137876,0.00056859537,0.44904858,0.17013822,0.000055396224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39939833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3111907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6006017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017420042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007055573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79414713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522403117","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006317","title":"Mandates of the State: Canadian Sovereignty, Democracy, and Indigenous Claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Autonomy; Democracy; Deliberation; Inclusion (mineral); Negotiation; State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Ethos; Politics; Inclusion–exclusion principle; Deliberative democracy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.008731184738897587,"score_gpt":0.25768411704483285,"score_spread":0.24895293230593527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522403117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28099597,0.0057619014,0.00081969885,0.059030343,0.0002250145,0.000054788925,0.00016930388,0.000025220803,0.65291774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98145974,0.0009524537,0.0003112867,0.0016428378,0.000023115475,0.000012116061,0.000022810118,0.000009682224,0.015565881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962297,0.000580693,0.00010163415,0.00034943674,0.0011599383,0.0015785303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643815,0.0015414577,0.00024130926,0.0001799755,0.00092870655,0.0006705142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034354941,0.00022392861,0.00042827745,0.0014640486,0.035570364,0.009666468,0.0023038886,0.0035917265,0.005311157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063209804,0.0002838471,0.00030221412,0.0025256288,0.02555111,0.0029700326,0.0056313705,0.0057747443,0.00013653797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018670156,0.000019301648,0.0028541076,0.000051084487,0.0000069371977,0.00031978512,0.08376549,0.00016873106,0.00016600631,0.896584,0.00668018,0.009365763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006215336,0.000050243696,0.057126675,0.0007266572,0.000102844635,0.00044025134,0.20706666,0.0022648778,0.00075720035,0.257407,0.47369373,0.0003018048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122529574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.122529574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13091303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8890184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2577507033","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2017.8","title":"When Procedure Takes Priority: A Theoretical Evaluation of the Contemporary Trends in Criminal Procedure and Evidence Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University; Tel Aviv University; University of Toronto; Hebrew University of Jerusalem","keywords":"Discretion; Flexibility (engineering); Procedural law; Law; Substantive law; Political science; Criminal law; Judicial discretion; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Legal practice; Sociology; Economics; Judicial review","score_opus":0.12494761606815333,"score_gpt":0.40590318473112375,"score_spread":0.28095556866297045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2577507033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10322606,0.039882597,0.19626424,0.1469024,0.00083355315,0.00023419336,0.00015635569,0.0001121487,0.5123884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95901984,0.010907564,0.02299722,0.0024337645,0.0007083422,0.00019633699,0.000050797033,0.00005745429,0.0036287566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899939,0.005595161,0.0003841402,0.0009841962,0.0022501552,0.00079253817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787335,0.015963081,0.0017234045,0.0010138558,0.0018446915,0.0007214748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013320303,0.00053617824,0.0006127803,0.008367624,0.0047285575,0.016122181,0.0029239962,0.007020785,0.005080806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020164182,0.0005558181,0.0007837046,0.0064768447,0.07251,0.022624608,0.0045901346,0.0061610015,0.00049788074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037326693,0.000007760973,0.00019655123,0.000020828154,0.000001187763,0.000020172905,0.0011726256,0.00016405908,0.00002364169,0.9958454,0.00014430413,0.0023997098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009806497,0.000024872259,0.0009797794,0.00019302957,0.0000074748327,0.00008360433,0.0030151412,0.0029962272,0.000091325615,0.9831525,0.009431145,0.0000151312015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005330832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056016343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9878618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012138189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008949438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08806914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586340792","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006330","title":"‘Obligations’, Decolonization and Indigenous Rights to Governance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Obligation; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Geography","score_opus":0.01290009913857267,"score_gpt":0.2809436500038997,"score_spread":0.26804355086532705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586340792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2793067,0.0044566994,0.008319615,0.023471285,0.000108055974,0.00006886394,0.00007851207,0.000084294166,0.684106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846971,0.0005242057,0.00056933606,0.00050349836,0.000014752526,0.00001355561,0.000012030674,0.000014571076,0.013650826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610054,0.0007453538,0.00006582001,0.00034142606,0.0008905935,0.0018562934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973291,0.0006960157,0.0002802012,0.00025790412,0.00079892646,0.0006378496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002859033,0.0002807466,0.00036493797,0.0008981682,0.013007507,0.0077345828,0.0015272697,0.0015170737,0.0034077957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004161218,0.00019977428,0.00023732801,0.0011203148,0.06949294,0.0035640465,0.0050777504,0.00260688,0.0001869422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059260733,0.000006557264,0.0015106467,0.000026711836,0.0000033683189,0.00012622622,0.04172574,0.00036308265,0.00015705691,0.94918346,0.0011768547,0.0057143075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025449932,0.00003061019,0.02821147,0.00052637194,0.000032766955,0.00029543086,0.107090466,0.0019995077,0.00070355757,0.50827044,0.35269865,0.000115285475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9428063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95757335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9428063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06568148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06913258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4765547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587453561","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006032","title":"Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Law edited by François Tanguay-Renaud and James Stribopoulos Oxford and Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2012. ISBN 978-1-84946-010-1. xii + 321 pp.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Publishing; Law; Subject matter; Queen (butterfly); Index (typography); German; Sociology; Political science; History; Library science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.029609670987713454,"score_gpt":0.2849894635113597,"score_spread":0.25537979252364623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587453561","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040156688,0.6162864,0.0057737185,0.12538287,0.004964303,0.00004211397,0.00029668308,0.00009583922,0.24314238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18685766,0.6003666,0.00821945,0.01069314,0.0017658117,0.000093553004,0.00036944126,0.00024734423,0.19138694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979296,0.00055460643,0.00006812481,0.00019352617,0.0009101909,0.0003440009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978219,0.000763152,0.00014510122,0.00011185714,0.0007903837,0.00036756415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002735589,0.0014580375,0.0011178326,0.006375645,0.011201869,0.012483055,0.0022122187,0.0029540113,0.010461294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003236417,0.00081133883,0.0005272354,0.011785821,0.02908203,0.008582223,0.0031326578,0.0050512175,0.0010720474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011702638,0.0000150720525,0.00047145877,0.00043444478,0.000011446187,0.00016255339,0.019307652,0.00030732667,0.00009257112,0.66570514,0.2445138,0.06896686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004171702,0.000004053182,0.0012052943,0.0009676784,0.000008687761,0.00010461083,0.010455193,0.00021703109,0.000045052708,0.09387466,0.89309174,0.000021862701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8686129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92711776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13138711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08136961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.101884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5903806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26166760","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005737","title":"On the Intrinsic Value of Arabic in Israel—Challenging Kymlicka on Language Rights","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Minority Rights and Languages","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minority language; Political science; Linguistics; Minority rights; Identity (music); Immigration; Cultural rights; Sociology; Law; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014858159740188805,"score_gpt":0.2940361181945036,"score_spread":0.2791779584543148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26166760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24621521,0.0037145126,0.003195836,0.06321601,0.00032488094,0.000037157806,0.00004342262,0.000012888974,0.68324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792788,0.00077052304,0.00055581034,0.0033740324,0.00021157198,0.000022630524,0.000010117618,0.000011140361,0.015765445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845135,0.0007727645,0.000048960028,0.00015484531,0.00029276925,0.00027930056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978053,0.0013106636,0.00020081924,0.00013504783,0.00037678934,0.00017133623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026587762,0.00030224895,0.0003736955,0.00076380745,0.007103602,0.0082913665,0.00074727705,0.0026477946,0.0038098271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033978007,0.0001474097,0.0002288023,0.0004884795,0.020503253,0.005590476,0.0056085447,0.0048876107,0.00049470295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016801538,0.000017151982,0.0005512255,0.0000140540715,0.0000029522073,0.0001590097,0.012439604,0.000067346344,0.00017134057,0.9807335,0.0015277375,0.004299197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005076365,0.00006292312,0.0036304416,0.00031860304,0.000017896664,0.00036511474,0.039507296,0.0010885997,0.0010203593,0.80690336,0.14698641,0.000048172646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077814674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009209557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0082913665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005033056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022509238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03651756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740952829","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2017.15","title":"Unreliable Narration in Law and Fiction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Agatha; Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Law and literature; Law; Sociology; Literature; Psychology; History; Political science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022057949928167897,"score_gpt":0.30214382925243377,"score_spread":0.2800858793242659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740952829","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3398873,0.03156111,0.05753785,0.07738122,0.0037193503,0.00009512196,0.0003292248,0.00037449948,0.48911443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987181,0.0019694834,0.0019608587,0.0011916211,0.00059199304,0.00002723229,0.000058792193,0.00011396153,0.006905202],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804314,0.014286149,0.0004921225,0.0009294149,0.003209617,0.00065120263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96195066,0.027878365,0.003562107,0.0026578156,0.0032136575,0.000737508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006745418,0.00068859954,0.000516496,0.003333412,0.008648445,0.010846033,0.0014166111,0.0030914533,0.0045639668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046526648,0.00039378254,0.00027459365,0.0016612245,0.03527628,0.01316672,0.007949606,0.003345895,0.0007730143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007112787,0.0000112341395,0.0018691259,0.00028671863,0.000017181424,0.0012320493,0.55605006,0.00035244093,0.0007252836,0.41114774,0.009393268,0.018843777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020609205,0.00006772466,0.0027016308,0.0012669193,0.00003528199,0.0019897649,0.1832648,0.001048365,0.0026247783,0.2529532,0.5539337,0.00009318457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005113433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004787509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010846033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057628825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022282328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041812897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742011336","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2017.12","title":"Should the Injustice Done to Her be the Law’s Concern? The Case of Cinderella","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Harm; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Mistake; Sociology; Political science; Economic Justice; Settlement (finance); Business","score_opus":0.10124538374452363,"score_gpt":0.36336047326480053,"score_spread":0.2621150895202769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742011336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09221598,0.0072251386,0.004843986,0.2448106,0.001391071,0.00008410095,0.000046405818,0.00004906239,0.64933366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8087211,0.0019011508,0.001892216,0.0758229,0.00031445187,0.000093662995,0.000016421076,0.000040000625,0.11119808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567646,0.0010069909,0.00007852851,0.00068729086,0.000917781,0.0016329759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997335,0.0013606779,0.00020800818,0.00019543448,0.0005924511,0.00030836015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003738818,0.00038577206,0.00044533197,0.0011934834,0.021446867,0.007755937,0.0023576801,0.01183156,0.0055175805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012251028,0.0003322712,0.00044001592,0.0006639634,0.027390312,0.0067975386,0.005264794,0.013092935,0.00055503246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013441008,0.0000123601385,0.0008935852,0.00003035913,0.0000058774153,0.0014889892,0.02531861,0.00011238102,0.00022039427,0.95590365,0.010250615,0.0057497392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025651838,0.00004782204,0.0020983715,0.00084134133,0.00005182268,0.0023687778,0.06469986,0.0005466688,0.0014262552,0.22434914,0.70341676,0.00012755414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34601748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38576925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34601748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017171333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012907939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6880069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789658255","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2018.7","title":"Transfer by Contract in Kant, Hegel, and Comparative Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; German; Obligation; Philosophy; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Contract theory; Social contract; Political science; Epistemology; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03531703248714378,"score_gpt":0.24171365808323966,"score_spread":0.2063966255960959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789658255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06343446,0.104995646,0.06105743,0.063852414,0.00092102174,0.00006210991,0.00011756237,0.00010739432,0.7054521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94904363,0.014707501,0.007927631,0.004735425,0.0009434296,0.00014032882,0.00005393663,0.000069931775,0.022378178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99355835,0.004099076,0.00014050247,0.00050568423,0.0010648228,0.00063165516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970873,0.002095116,0.00017479641,0.0003120273,0.00019406022,0.000136679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00838634,0.0005896402,0.0006744357,0.003086304,0.0048920056,0.008933744,0.0011575106,0.0055428394,0.0043949666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067522805,0.00035040354,0.00056516606,0.0031331345,0.057402138,0.015721703,0.003642332,0.0042848783,0.00048984523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025065497,0.0000027615943,0.000015637965,0.0000067408246,7.725515e-7,0.000005847009,0.000492344,0.000066732704,0.000005954404,0.9983109,0.0003190855,0.00077080267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045702996,0.0000052080445,0.00009028888,0.000045786164,0.0000017088046,0.000018468929,0.00050623016,0.00016329804,0.00003386815,0.9839765,0.015148414,0.000005806997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072627366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004064596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0132532995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0132532995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035590525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096159875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790018451","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2018.2","title":"Notes Toward a Postmodern Principle","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discoverability; Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Postmodernism; Statutory interpretation; Epistemology; Normative; Rhetorical question; Sociology; CITES; Directive; Reading (process); Linguistics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.028169165798758774,"score_gpt":0.3403192242615245,"score_spread":0.3121500584627657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790018451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01632517,0.0027569118,0.06778946,0.14533278,0.0015028116,0.00009359783,0.00013187405,0.00016555136,0.76590174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84134084,0.0014386658,0.03139937,0.023169363,0.0026589544,0.00038398732,0.00009680641,0.00025392603,0.09925823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99028987,0.0040298607,0.00026746056,0.0014027196,0.0033369777,0.00067304255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99253815,0.004128305,0.00034211078,0.0011418024,0.0016052846,0.00024439808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013210707,0.00052415574,0.00043043256,0.001722742,0.010163065,0.009135892,0.0023964038,0.004967083,0.005993142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011529182,0.0003873356,0.00060149014,0.0011719826,0.070903696,0.011390996,0.0045283157,0.012291618,0.001235539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010730739,0.0000013681803,0.000016112428,0.000003169299,2.7269223e-7,0.000007577541,0.0010340562,0.000013675236,0.000017474087,0.99772197,0.00069538975,0.0004877972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072540406,0.0000067043434,0.00009126645,0.00004704114,0.000001696626,0.000041464322,0.0008258863,0.0002844958,0.00014707753,0.92186636,0.07667335,0.000007389767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025463266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026222022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025463266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015368271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014809564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11150509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969451865","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2019.21","title":"Contract Damages, Moral Agency, and Henry James’ <i>The Ambassadors</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Plaintiff; Agency (philosophy); Compensation (psychology); Law and economics; Moral agency; Financial compensation; Agency cost; Law; Economics; Breach of contract; Actuarial science; Business; Sociology; Political science; Finance; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019547925876030298,"score_gpt":0.28231352270139554,"score_spread":0.26276559682536527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969451865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07505784,0.0070354454,0.009599042,0.14058937,0.001443457,0.0000693165,0.00005435383,0.000045409477,0.7661057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94368696,0.001032523,0.0011461667,0.007072574,0.0006809585,0.00004314139,0.000008823303,0.000016736789,0.04631211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99541277,0.0020450784,0.0001280243,0.00040559765,0.0014256417,0.0005829574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744874,0.0013300786,0.00038186586,0.00019666614,0.0003462889,0.00029625098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048034936,0.000347786,0.00031047195,0.0008727729,0.0051083127,0.00927195,0.0010917516,0.0055565396,0.0066382475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007977652,0.0002639747,0.0002944452,0.00047464564,0.02482375,0.0046242606,0.0034622569,0.0070953267,0.00041361488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000549901,0.000009057692,0.00004812039,0.0000080314085,0.0000014433838,0.00005362405,0.0020795595,0.000068651905,0.00004397796,0.9927636,0.0033410313,0.0015772977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030119405,0.000046052086,0.0007465573,0.00022434077,0.000012004975,0.00029570874,0.005751397,0.0007584141,0.00042960385,0.678686,0.31296805,0.000051790794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008807415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005811548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009597587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009597587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003551461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06963569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007999426","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2019.32","title":"<i>The Coxford Lecture</i> Seek the Good: Professional Trust, Justice, and the Rule of Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Rule of law; Admiration; Function (biology); Legal education; Due process; Constitution; Sociology; Political science; Common law; Psychology; Municipal law; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.02041028390006334,"score_gpt":0.278402052167158,"score_spread":0.2579917682670947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007999426","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020462882,0.054241586,0.00067856617,0.8362869,0.014874093,0.000011469848,0.000053408337,0.000026009147,0.09178174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24123643,0.06394322,0.001667806,0.15911658,0.01579318,0.000040483705,0.00007538356,0.0001846548,0.51794225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998481,0.0005590566,0.00004030097,0.00014103575,0.00042734641,0.00035133856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973603,0.001067313,0.00010798668,0.000068919224,0.00049005717,0.00090539013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002002442,0.00035487773,0.00026551544,0.0007411152,0.0103665525,0.009128142,0.0007431085,0.0043278737,0.012130502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004691231,0.00029546657,0.00026888683,0.00084522855,0.015587152,0.0055605066,0.0014400807,0.009468524,0.0021455593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001327994,0.0000158912,0.00029599524,0.000071779454,0.0000035248793,0.00008249639,0.0033672443,0.000037416965,0.0000994364,0.15567946,0.82925195,0.011081572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056777394,0.00000792978,0.000897401,0.00033265786,0.0000045950187,0.000093229544,0.0070367246,0.00010798944,0.00015260224,0.02809792,0.9632448,0.000018509276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40982428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6741348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40982428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026533905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023008028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8148777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008191152","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2019.33","title":"Reasonable Accommodation for Age","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; nobody; Reasonable accommodation; Perspective (graphical); Law; Scope (computer science); Opt-out; Conscience; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Computer security; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07395497734515308,"score_gpt":0.32980345894477453,"score_spread":0.2558484815996215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008191152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030210648,0.00407016,0.034413997,0.06185543,0.002165029,0.00027070646,0.00029462887,0.00017150184,0.8665479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8609038,0.0013549916,0.013617292,0.039964102,0.0013497566,0.0005201143,0.00020475837,0.00011897375,0.08196618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867887,0.0043241507,0.0013345156,0.0020430777,0.0028765986,0.0026328985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917509,0.0024079925,0.0008659823,0.0017711958,0.0021658945,0.0010380605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008508072,0.0004786288,0.0005946598,0.0007935347,0.007791219,0.006347809,0.0016717949,0.010504554,0.008755116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021708714,0.00033023648,0.0013555172,0.0005406914,0.019321335,0.007439012,0.007720495,0.009318465,0.0019579718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007774572,0.000012071271,0.0002809248,0.000023015664,0.0000031490874,0.000079550366,0.0013112857,0.00007099628,0.00009015733,0.99119097,0.004068359,0.0028617696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027717373,0.000081828504,0.0020771525,0.00038446384,0.000022356615,0.0005190497,0.002201972,0.00053314463,0.00039877312,0.66980404,0.32386607,0.00008337903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018018888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0171246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005231767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009066456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044995546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035659286","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2020.8","title":"Two Accounts of International Tax Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Distributive justice; Law and economics; Political science; Economic Justice; Politics; Fallacy; Normative; Scholarship; Political philosophy; Positive economics; Law; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.033239885081029985,"score_gpt":0.252856292412163,"score_spread":0.21961640733113302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035659286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070381123,0.0038982949,0.0031855712,0.045439877,0.0011964418,0.00002747661,0.00014577062,0.000060369126,0.9390082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6125705,0.005472284,0.0023337211,0.05665321,0.0039149155,0.00022175538,0.00038140282,0.00035210306,0.3181001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99418277,0.00096237747,0.00021596975,0.00081979943,0.0020267144,0.0017924075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99634284,0.0012640775,0.00036888753,0.000967527,0.0007854649,0.00027113172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042113126,0.00053247105,0.00045389216,0.0027081242,0.011078908,0.0146456,0.00182577,0.009523029,0.012460815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010564671,0.00032477503,0.0007687653,0.0043210736,0.016155237,0.009362203,0.008143533,0.012125765,0.001696701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026565963,0.000004038089,0.0001097799,0.000005887529,9.77501e-7,0.000026509768,0.0009762826,0.000030922405,0.000008919014,0.98732656,0.010004878,0.0015026521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010204515,0.000006535325,0.0008778673,0.00018092974,0.000009572168,0.0001845016,0.0022083193,0.0003765279,0.00016589924,0.3402784,0.6556768,0.000024492834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017091213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019578572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017091213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008157278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005038064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059185505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121173077","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004689","title":"A Reply to Critics of <i>Constitutional Goods</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Constitutional law; Politics; Art history; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Classics; Art","score_opus":0.026748426982610384,"score_gpt":0.3073624706739275,"score_spread":0.28061404369131715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121173077","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003133577,0.0016341538,0.00020546737,0.99004364,0.0039281584,0.0000019097365,0.0000108363,0.000011902198,0.0038506307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034432836,0.0032268886,0.00051398313,0.93314916,0.02024198,0.000028824303,0.000027841032,0.00018882875,0.008189735],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765128,0.009866131,0.0010785187,0.0027483348,0.008101057,0.001693163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9142985,0.06580231,0.0031257193,0.0027228917,0.011374178,0.002676475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02696235,0.0009664319,0.0016047079,0.002199934,0.012844893,0.016856851,0.005504477,0.04374275,0.0072949734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09185931,0.0008955836,0.0013780791,0.004306438,0.044108674,0.022388967,0.008989319,0.063296996,0.0020808666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022398453,0.000009443012,0.00024619687,0.00010619813,0.000012789095,0.00015313136,0.005839847,0.00011056462,0.000060062113,0.18449569,0.8042299,0.0047136955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036990106,0.00001908376,0.0005605128,0.00069436926,0.00002162599,0.00025311054,0.012418491,0.00029985415,0.00025545454,0.1050225,0.88033384,0.00008415863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016594812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01991285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98836505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011634962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009825981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14259225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121667437","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002381","title":"Professional Status and the Freedom to Contract: Toward a Common Law Duty of Non-Discrimination","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Duty; Law; Doctrine; Legislation; Freedom of contract; Service (business); Race (biology); Public law; Political science; Private law; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.025356954900259115,"score_gpt":0.3312106010967158,"score_spread":0.30585364619645666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121667437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08796355,0.0018943183,0.067290604,0.19290803,0.0007089978,0.00019079725,0.00006402962,0.000053699325,0.648926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633762,0.000427853,0.0071687307,0.009927983,0.00022253547,0.000100722245,0.000021349464,0.00002284076,0.018731792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765622,0.0076875472,0.0008866524,0.00253973,0.008294177,0.0040297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828394,0.0077125835,0.0015130743,0.002484405,0.0026978534,0.0027528037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021674117,0.000399164,0.00080054766,0.0020235386,0.0146739725,0.0152210295,0.00249056,0.013271734,0.0032018225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031205213,0.0005962808,0.00083571876,0.0012641276,0.119571656,0.010661842,0.011388096,0.010793346,0.00062955666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022851527,0.000005780872,0.00015025109,0.0000029475893,7.047885e-7,0.000018379704,0.0024180515,0.00004165293,0.000029735436,0.99595225,0.00036456826,0.0010133688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020906027,0.000014866273,0.0005215404,0.00006719329,0.0000041585304,0.00008528354,0.0026629257,0.00035645865,0.000094254625,0.96412385,0.032024264,0.000024375562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11556729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09554101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88443273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014018462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04402539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22978926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121889772","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2016.1","title":"On the Spontaneous Emergence of Private Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Section (typography); Scope (computer science); Transaction cost; Law and economics; Process (computing); Private law; Database transaction; Political science; Law; Economics; Public law; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Legislature","score_opus":0.026296379070605776,"score_gpt":0.20778364044312944,"score_spread":0.18148726137252366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121889772","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29061958,0.0011473232,0.37882963,0.02486291,0.00013891728,0.00035144415,0.0002005683,0.00025709704,0.30359253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98392975,0.0002212092,0.012442776,0.0003613723,0.00006129387,0.00009866808,0.000031449537,0.000026354974,0.0028270755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913407,0.0044867066,0.0002552884,0.0011411376,0.001920812,0.0008553097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668259,0.021602467,0.0024758636,0.005501893,0.00281846,0.0007754063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013378591,0.00024966372,0.00045701477,0.0013729439,0.0031878417,0.0045110304,0.001201616,0.0021381269,0.0037348294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0310587,0.00030374128,0.00060059107,0.00075590145,0.02075903,0.007522811,0.0036635655,0.0033721447,0.00040490952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034571735,0.000009551226,0.00034414075,0.0000085556485,0.000002045286,0.000048305243,0.00067861396,0.000674095,0.00012282141,0.99549437,0.00021902595,0.0023951358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012556248,0.000014471904,0.0005131981,0.00002740738,0.000002738991,0.00007596038,0.00048551746,0.005175824,0.00026293762,0.9864189,0.007002031,0.000008435946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020565249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017296952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013378591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030795843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036924337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070753574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122642849","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005555","title":"Testing Theory and Debunking Stereotypes: Lawyers’ Views on the Practice of Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Professional conduct; Legal ethics; Ethical code; Public relations; Professional responsibility; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.07706624245631,"score_gpt":0.38284459148184546,"score_spread":0.30577834902553547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122642849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92796874,0.0008790385,0.0052596196,0.026753776,0.00013927057,0.000057308807,0.000015068557,0.00003713653,0.03889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99797565,0.00014179196,0.00025994782,0.0009264409,0.000030663698,0.000013333103,0.0000046940913,0.0000114561635,0.0006359922],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.90725094,0.074502945,0.001551142,0.0025109362,0.010272305,0.0039116982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8573731,0.11322651,0.01379132,0.0050978106,0.007079165,0.00343216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054556318,0.0005291354,0.00070191047,0.005567364,0.017118284,0.017163906,0.0032521172,0.0060500763,0.002708226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.108804315,0.0008308142,0.00056042464,0.0026149573,0.07363991,0.01493761,0.012354159,0.010609444,0.0002669249],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018512545,0.000023529428,0.0037238465,0.000025462448,0.0000058091814,0.00016623407,0.9792326,0.00003194803,0.00015319357,0.012534384,0.00025044763,0.003834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009942012,0.000041375144,0.001985049,0.00011421746,0.000006618502,0.00014599263,0.98087585,0.0002402473,0.000185354,0.011257793,0.005121125,0.000016446695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014587994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010737873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054556318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010363314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075799776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28852487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123691632","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000370","title":"Constitutional Theory and The<i>Quebec Secession Reference</i>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Law; Constitution; Vesting; Politics; Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01400066725398214,"score_gpt":0.2774123435652219,"score_spread":0.26341167631123974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123691632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052251182,0.02283295,0.0063413144,0.233715,0.0020806661,0.00010121029,0.00075516046,0.00014764033,0.68177485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8784683,0.004155191,0.0028227812,0.018655356,0.00033975253,0.000059834034,0.00012304785,0.00006544827,0.09531035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949522,0.0014496768,0.00013405178,0.00057708914,0.0015176886,0.0013692802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955836,0.0016527437,0.00016173927,0.0001968199,0.0019839173,0.00042115554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004636284,0.000366675,0.00040686407,0.0018248142,0.024784181,0.011961137,0.002701721,0.0053039673,0.00763884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008271719,0.00037641393,0.00050112844,0.002306514,0.026257843,0.0020639836,0.0019108187,0.005434026,0.00034346074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000668767,0.0000033333074,0.00043298097,0.000033853234,0.000004652958,0.00015890003,0.00372833,0.00028172164,0.00011643283,0.9704635,0.020410487,0.004359071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005152707,0.000021805827,0.008703167,0.00076538505,0.00006618497,0.0002085201,0.016643813,0.002256248,0.00077088206,0.1660021,0.8043294,0.00018093767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99410015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99605006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17301004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17301004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15593825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95919114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124877502","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005634","title":"Professor Raz, the Rule of Law, and the <i>Tobacco Act</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Legislation; Rule of law; Statutory interpretation; Charter; Damages; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012557742456289472,"score_gpt":0.26976392151120326,"score_spread":0.2572061790549138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124877502","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018469742,0.040711574,0.013171542,0.5409041,0.0020304252,0.00012903965,0.00033959668,0.00013961723,0.38410437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72417605,0.017899586,0.014014848,0.1348183,0.0020514284,0.00016982232,0.00013722393,0.00009641154,0.10663629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934923,0.001596079,0.00029261239,0.00084524736,0.0025636822,0.0012100199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968695,0.0016738164,0.00040898073,0.00015209983,0.00068397453,0.00021158799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049440246,0.00041858855,0.00045500003,0.0010590304,0.009240387,0.008221252,0.0016558416,0.008674838,0.0031729133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008478519,0.0003673039,0.0006257211,0.0014356422,0.031727985,0.003994753,0.0022786756,0.011911923,0.00082022115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004613883,0.000002994359,0.0001102365,0.000015943686,0.0000019323725,0.000039869083,0.00081481325,0.00007520688,0.000045672914,0.9854811,0.011499441,0.0019083743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037837643,0.000025980493,0.0011106279,0.00019724177,0.000022423597,0.00014287732,0.0011163739,0.0005135991,0.00035099633,0.5781891,0.41823822,0.000054682136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42524043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38391772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5747596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018607737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03023119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8455305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125232704","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004987","title":"Responsibility in Negligence: Why the Duty of Care is <i>not</i> a Duty “To Try”","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Res ipsa loquitur; Duty of care; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Law and economics; Moral responsibility; Business; Reasonable person; Tort; Political science; Economics; Medicine; Liability","score_opus":0.0216370570456765,"score_gpt":0.27935984507931133,"score_spread":0.25772278803363485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125232704","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036685094,0.012777945,0.066172466,0.47353992,0.0032241559,0.000085597465,0.000104965264,0.0001519437,0.4072579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9367943,0.0027673403,0.0074141747,0.030826006,0.0011057185,0.00007885919,0.000043922442,0.00008494093,0.020884873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938438,0.0024141052,0.00029342528,0.00084452657,0.0017579646,0.0008462349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99421567,0.0029132022,0.00056574,0.00064533635,0.0011250868,0.0005350169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072795367,0.00041151667,0.0005132716,0.0010026848,0.0043797786,0.006260996,0.0015843057,0.008588672,0.0043634945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013662148,0.0003560915,0.0006371511,0.00048525643,0.056005634,0.010130272,0.0035234254,0.005916092,0.0011106986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006327546,0.0000070116403,0.00025860517,0.000028293745,0.0000032034043,0.00009346839,0.003139841,0.000085857355,0.00008564194,0.98734933,0.006038737,0.0029035488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009031195,0.0000089976165,0.00059455755,0.000078088415,0.000003867233,0.00023301024,0.0014585017,0.00023469112,0.00011611617,0.9590606,0.038185406,0.000017032547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014310949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010203043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014310949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057686637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062565976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04185474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133841220","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2020.21","title":"Transforming American Prosecution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Mass incarceration; Race (biology); Law; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.020175631457010068,"score_gpt":0.311588332634847,"score_spread":0.2914127011778369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133841220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034136645,0.0044389744,0.0040126187,0.15944418,0.0060505117,0.000039388724,0.000057273923,0.00015090934,0.7916695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7367533,0.0035372803,0.0035934523,0.07973015,0.0024873165,0.00011949746,0.00009383918,0.00026590787,0.17341928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943581,0.0019519132,0.0001529871,0.00065592834,0.0016237526,0.001257344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941402,0.0018581218,0.00027927064,0.00057283195,0.0020666602,0.0010827497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006470702,0.00043852776,0.00039674045,0.0023754477,0.013746521,0.010130737,0.0011561981,0.00594673,0.013075627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016633632,0.0003082161,0.00032847337,0.0014621114,0.012227796,0.005022544,0.009026569,0.009752443,0.003129351],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001589338,0.00007191338,0.001323725,0.000026953172,0.000004106324,0.00016180851,0.0067947544,0.00011249762,0.00012124389,0.8599096,0.082133524,0.049324054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011268445,0.000020074482,0.0012611373,0.00018612387,0.000007821221,0.00012514825,0.0054148794,0.0002943575,0.00020031251,0.104985595,0.88747555,0.00001757668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024415951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048510693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024415951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006885144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010653204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049955428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186849605","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2021.13","title":"Why Is Aboriginal Title Property if It Looks Like Sovereignty?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Supreme court; Law; Alienation; Jurisdiction; Property (philosophy); Subject (documents); Assertion; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.019042129692233862,"score_gpt":0.2903120987473367,"score_spread":0.27126996905510287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186849605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10108281,0.013772833,0.014472913,0.19827583,0.0012555354,0.00004439495,0.00032754408,0.000097473065,0.6706706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95639825,0.003783519,0.0016523312,0.012373489,0.0006441656,0.000031035546,0.000117432726,0.000071662536,0.024928054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643385,0.00088019244,0.00011697471,0.0006925188,0.0010623204,0.00081411557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99589455,0.0017797194,0.00037456592,0.0006709909,0.0009665071,0.0003137131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035019808,0.00017958412,0.000520363,0.0007277993,0.009049631,0.008931448,0.0015692554,0.0040511526,0.0058784904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009684136,0.0002917514,0.0005078258,0.0011741376,0.03741607,0.010230465,0.0025346135,0.0050251344,0.00083716697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069584494,0.0000037208122,0.0013372551,0.000040269213,0.000007214847,0.00024272961,0.016059224,0.000043045206,0.00012552981,0.97212267,0.0054720812,0.004539239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017506147,0.000035414483,0.011504032,0.00066675345,0.00004895264,0.0010729785,0.029552476,0.00040203016,0.000506118,0.57794243,0.37818414,0.00006726945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23674576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2454837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7632542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009213644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009406416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47073555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W343594246","doi":"10.1017/s084182090000374x","title":"The Role of Reasonableness in Self-Defence","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.02211771723034685,"score_gpt":0.22707006072675562,"score_spread":0.20495234349640876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W343594246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11025047,0.0072427955,0.13526227,0.07519453,0.00061579695,0.00016329114,0.0000926062,0.00017939258,0.67099875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876835,0.0004409699,0.007012823,0.0015027695,0.00015075791,0.00006293653,0.000018012695,0.000046676927,0.0030816235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9634871,0.022349983,0.0019027739,0.0034830568,0.0056837765,0.0030933025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9352995,0.040774733,0.005841266,0.008095013,0.0070799207,0.0029095032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030151332,0.00056009303,0.0010672305,0.003387181,0.0066219205,0.010317966,0.0025986445,0.0089569865,0.0043630595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058671154,0.00068964635,0.001751156,0.0014877277,0.07794256,0.015089855,0.007932307,0.008177632,0.0006006832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048134034,0.000005939986,0.0002227667,0.000015306348,0.000005677962,0.00004082078,0.0008415755,0.000113540285,0.000032869622,0.9975048,0.00022314007,0.0009887692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008966364,0.000011351053,0.0002688468,0.000037938014,0.000006242344,0.00007415453,0.00045321602,0.0003361308,0.00006234881,0.9951139,0.0036173305,0.000009623798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00550584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036223412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030151332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072646583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052701854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15945745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205734915","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006226","title":"The Coxford Lecture: Arbitrariness","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Supreme court; Law; Rule of law; Power (physics); Order (exchange); Political science; Public law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.016492290511753098,"score_gpt":0.2696170006024874,"score_spread":0.2531247100907343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205734915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026806223,0.21676321,0.010514776,0.28091335,0.014730584,0.000019276627,0.000080913276,0.00006210069,0.4742352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4401484,0.15236238,0.0076996023,0.04349956,0.048272245,0.00016469971,0.00010382747,0.00030511396,0.30744413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972132,0.0011904027,0.00009003949,0.00038976507,0.00084094127,0.00027575376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995014,0.003972742,0.00014497731,0.00030062953,0.00039910665,0.00016851537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00455829,0.0005484189,0.0005559683,0.0013725178,0.0044337274,0.006417267,0.0008626246,0.0047707283,0.014817324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00940499,0.0005055467,0.0006813672,0.0013123757,0.015989607,0.009893597,0.001743836,0.009887601,0.0027887127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005510644,0.0000049756327,0.000025019137,0.000022502742,0.000002334001,0.000024353994,0.00020148575,0.00009292368,0.000025684629,0.9584892,0.03653057,0.0045753885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008643965,0.000006988883,0.00010718066,0.00019398455,0.0000035014953,0.000037589376,0.0001295865,0.00032453783,0.00006988213,0.689715,0.30939266,0.000010444208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012347247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0102056675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014817324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008779362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035751143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06369901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211254543","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004550","title":"Nonconstitutional Amendments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Democracy; Political science; Constitutional economics; Liberal democracy; Law; Constitutional amendment; Democratic legitimacy; Sovereignty; Phenomenon; Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029800279208614836,"score_gpt":0.313601402395157,"score_spread":0.28380112318654216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211254543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01603678,0.0015167368,0.039097752,0.0056246757,0.0011341545,0.00015621432,0.0002936537,0.00019681874,0.9359432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8497191,0.00120404,0.017017733,0.0037773822,0.0013653492,0.0005894962,0.00034189603,0.000160734,0.12582423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766128,0.009113403,0.0018084496,0.0047102654,0.0057888823,0.001966081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98084795,0.009142908,0.0011342741,0.0062462026,0.0023269,0.00030173568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01394083,0.0005289362,0.00075723167,0.0014990852,0.0061188564,0.0065244366,0.0022441829,0.003236085,0.01674069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023219246,0.00051355985,0.0008829117,0.0016329451,0.020594552,0.0068595503,0.005463641,0.006243158,0.0034707547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021092226,0.0000030283777,0.000025614558,0.00000785479,0.0000015602392,0.000010019036,0.0001848714,0.000021090165,0.000054680255,0.9976386,0.0005643948,0.0014863188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026478103,0.000024073457,0.0003032039,0.00006326472,0.00001340732,0.000095817304,0.00022788846,0.00038511693,0.00076263957,0.8198817,0.17819928,0.000017235381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021960845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003795258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033884628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042190724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07372701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213328683","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2021.22","title":"Time and Moral Choice in Islamic Jurisprudence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Revelation; Argument (complex analysis); Islam; Law; Scholarship; Balance (ability); Fiqh; Divine law; Epistemology; Action (physics); Philosophy; Sociology; Sharia; Political science; Psychology; Comparative law; Theology; Black letter law","score_opus":0.01709881830870982,"score_gpt":0.2651096134549671,"score_spread":0.24801079514625726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213328683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38972762,0.0032886362,0.02134312,0.021125875,0.00035966316,0.000077728255,0.000042376552,0.000030860014,0.5640041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691004,0.000112163005,0.000716896,0.00022001559,0.000029539813,0.000011281605,0.0000022536158,0.0000045626075,0.0019933302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906831,0.0056713726,0.0003900328,0.0008974121,0.0015323531,0.00082568993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99147683,0.005197729,0.0011024058,0.00056991365,0.0009235451,0.0007296032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011278605,0.0001978953,0.00043712292,0.0011728157,0.006015599,0.0071588256,0.0009947934,0.0028163374,0.00286401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011047154,0.0003211468,0.00033097147,0.0008903764,0.06463106,0.004816399,0.004803833,0.003680715,0.0002240089],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012634639,0.000010713014,0.00020497809,0.0000070274623,0.0000023625164,0.00003710394,0.0052801585,0.00014211285,0.00010192151,0.99295783,0.00015793789,0.0010851957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060581675,0.000044551172,0.001202216,0.00006129632,0.000005851683,0.000063324755,0.0056557017,0.0009183682,0.00021738936,0.9702767,0.0214608,0.00003321939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006469032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00499334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011278605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066666068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035453225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05964762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213453743","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.5","title":"Justice in Transactions Benson Peter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04144759399428701,"score_gpt":0.31990826728443755,"score_spread":0.27846067329015056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213453743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017769245,0.009594309,0.0018295672,0.05686765,0.0010138858,0.00003603499,0.00015721675,0.00003526247,0.9126968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.675864,0.006308473,0.00081659434,0.00923065,0.0010345047,0.00007062501,0.000101111254,0.00012315786,0.30645093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952264,0.0018523443,0.00017586221,0.00060084247,0.0010828116,0.0010617658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966574,0.0015914496,0.00016453865,0.00038859944,0.0007749138,0.00042317028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032661078,0.00033698752,0.00047205234,0.0010816787,0.00974695,0.008959561,0.00070015306,0.0054753395,0.03737998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011426841,0.00031792256,0.00025426812,0.0016812994,0.0073693586,0.0067907493,0.0038145266,0.0038033484,0.003920698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021977336,0.000007010431,0.00034538782,0.000020778292,0.000003340242,0.00010384938,0.0012447642,0.00011767351,0.000041846608,0.94365424,0.047979575,0.006459526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002142935,0.00002316522,0.002154367,0.00037545376,0.000014461488,0.0002086846,0.0038637135,0.00061358925,0.00022823471,0.49848604,0.4939798,0.000031012267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034023874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040501695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03737998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069059897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071682674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12504852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224313367","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.9","title":"Contract as Transfer of Ownership, Even Without Consideration","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Economics; sort; Law; Common law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03336708925542781,"score_gpt":0.3160125562178211,"score_spread":0.2826454669623933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224313367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051627465,0.0032535838,0.16867374,0.034129977,0.00063947524,0.00015915626,0.00010367593,0.00014490499,0.741268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9583178,0.0007575478,0.010129867,0.0032832867,0.00044494585,0.00025312268,0.000049069928,0.000070176364,0.026694154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984584,0.007417867,0.0006730777,0.001587632,0.004564505,0.0011729061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989296,0.005958342,0.0008315014,0.0016698014,0.0018694791,0.00037477363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009543787,0.00043636851,0.0006443918,0.001526925,0.0048963316,0.009134615,0.001670713,0.009006024,0.006590059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014396423,0.00046548052,0.0009823949,0.001638034,0.042398438,0.014126272,0.005328388,0.00766721,0.0007800366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002281827,0.0000022783172,0.000022887565,0.0000040555096,9.198758e-7,0.000016208864,0.00024679682,0.00008126907,0.00001910472,0.99891317,0.0001907158,0.00050030695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007012457,0.000013561101,0.00007177572,0.000053152773,0.0000046178498,0.000079683254,0.00021646463,0.00092516426,0.00011233003,0.9825289,0.015977778,0.000009499824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062011187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024316334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009543787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008774538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062911273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06366402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238304294","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2021.2","title":"CJL volume 34 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Environmental science; Computer science; Geography; Engineering; Physics; Mathematics; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.020698966674556504,"score_gpt":0.2004634378813849,"score_spread":0.1797644712068284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238304294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003749136,0.001862108,0.0002196792,0.0055164467,0.018337004,0.00012720725,0.0018640357,0.00073585176,0.9709628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010324434,0.0007039814,0.00013331504,0.0013794272,0.002725868,0.0000191741,0.0006442906,0.00022727971,0.99313426],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983011,0.00007773322,0.000050927087,0.00018693773,0.0011747003,0.00020859325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99587315,0.0003716264,0.00010999429,0.0002879014,0.002139106,0.0012181676],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011314033,0.0010307349,0.0010965603,0.005085757,0.0034668418,0.009424922,0.0015441594,0.0038579265,0.87596554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004083019,0.00049206836,0.00096857554,0.0032483696,0.0009829439,0.0024461686,0.0021757311,0.0025224893,0.7852916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012442014,0.000026729234,0.00006366208,0.00007997345,0.0000018668725,0.000029537961,0.000008766063,0.000024737552,0.00017137514,0.0010375279,0.9731197,0.025423564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059876106,0.0000070820397,0.00050285365,0.00007867537,0.0000015944128,0.000028907578,0.000024040031,0.000057162004,0.0000711476,0.00043367656,0.99878365,0.0000053337553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018677196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041168623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124034464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042851185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054937587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17692012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242791994","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2018.21","title":"CJL volume 31 issue 2 Cover and Front matter","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Front cover; Front (military); Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Environmental science; Computer science; Engineering; Geography; Meteorology; Physics; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.020420535455122683,"score_gpt":0.20573510817263752,"score_spread":0.18531457271751484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242791994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004267543,0.0017627091,0.00024666864,0.0069133965,0.017049445,0.000110187924,0.0014780872,0.0007159252,0.9712967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013813339,0.00066501537,0.00016883413,0.0017552942,0.0028711273,0.000018165058,0.0005631423,0.00023098003,0.9923459],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801743,0.00009043547,0.00006198692,0.00020475718,0.0013957736,0.0002296426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952277,0.00042913863,0.00012446028,0.00037792537,0.002400299,0.0014404377],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013149868,0.00091694127,0.00095406926,0.004661619,0.0037280116,0.009803941,0.001477846,0.004062963,0.86200494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048478222,0.00047303995,0.00087667396,0.0028815207,0.001167643,0.0026790753,0.0024407788,0.0026194844,0.7591742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012592113,0.000028436094,0.000085955595,0.000070113114,0.000002052327,0.000038568967,0.000011550899,0.000025244115,0.00016818604,0.0014155325,0.97073966,0.027401995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058533255,0.0000058717756,0.00043563984,0.00007121439,0.000001525688,0.0000360717,0.000028062463,0.00006244404,0.00007564605,0.0004928992,0.9987796,0.0000051180314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018606083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042483255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13799506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047458485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062078047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1968332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249094167","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003568","title":"Introduction","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.025087845036692057,"score_gpt":0.2709248688244287,"score_spread":0.2458370237877366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249094167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028558942,0.0048659286,0.008188746,0.022146981,0.008759875,0.00054352824,0.016907644,0.0019557604,0.93377566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015676793,0.0045643235,0.00481698,0.0062262444,0.0020891316,0.00037321143,0.012437589,0.0005527398,0.95326304],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986934,0.00014324486,0.00006504809,0.00035547494,0.00056593533,0.00017691062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983846,0.00017530948,0.00008413904,0.00016359992,0.00083274196,0.00035965754],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012509426,0.0009743738,0.0004981865,0.0015711787,0.0019854882,0.0052912156,0.0018820837,0.002710977,0.5326121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004055634,0.0003322243,0.00067773944,0.0015075195,0.00085982797,0.002654569,0.0025168865,0.0019243667,0.35770056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008466418,0.00007547961,0.0009987239,0.0004352305,0.000007452931,0.00018848528,0.00056672725,0.00016950599,0.00061978126,0.04325477,0.79844266,0.15515652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037001957,0.000014099374,0.0005476625,0.00013893755,0.000002280305,0.000073603704,0.00013771943,0.000027989405,0.00009976129,0.0030236244,0.99592483,0.0000057635707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007426917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006494903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5326121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027558634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003994013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6666721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251397852","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2020.15","title":"CJL volume 33 issue 2 Cover and Front matter","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Environmental science; Geography; Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.02640632338403906,"score_gpt":0.19570481258400566,"score_spread":0.1692984891999666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251397852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003467675,0.0014268274,0.00021544975,0.005468879,0.01739205,0.00011912299,0.0016942105,0.0007380016,0.9725987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010423833,0.0005218927,0.00012465556,0.0014523062,0.0026177648,0.000018788754,0.0005655267,0.00022511666,0.9934315],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983708,0.00007308047,0.0000474134,0.0001721897,0.0011324554,0.00020408737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99610376,0.00034694726,0.000096037846,0.0002878821,0.0020157793,0.0011495239],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011481094,0.0009483127,0.001017407,0.004396423,0.0034005647,0.009456087,0.001407888,0.0038545306,0.8702622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038964956,0.00048109426,0.00093677756,0.0028063622,0.0009873789,0.0023543604,0.0021136114,0.0025654961,0.7803103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011883016,0.000022173694,0.00005789213,0.00006278812,0.000001654155,0.000029464085,0.000008452745,0.000022991318,0.00016046189,0.0011127061,0.9776397,0.020869782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063519788,0.0000067065507,0.00047043394,0.000066550165,0.0000014739743,0.000027835737,0.000024257608,0.000062187246,0.0000708148,0.00043686604,0.9988213,0.000005190904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01945064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043249484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8702622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041558016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055185067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1850552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255014462","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2020.20","title":"Judging Rationally","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminate; Positivism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.048127391765847786,"score_gpt":0.3742530337472996,"score_spread":0.32612564198145183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255014462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053794272,0.0023995896,0.35211557,0.034544513,0.0022492665,0.0005450711,0.0007998956,0.0009969883,0.5525548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8447825,0.0012741182,0.12068864,0.0034065465,0.0011310399,0.00036258987,0.00082613784,0.0002921878,0.027236346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98297775,0.0057595936,0.0013126732,0.0034031498,0.0055075167,0.0010393834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96815085,0.0174776,0.0020784629,0.0046287347,0.0068296925,0.0008347202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0101261195,0.0010135102,0.00083450926,0.0018688393,0.0019863804,0.007760642,0.0018290238,0.0032514946,0.01524036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071178086,0.00045639923,0.0008054402,0.0009136848,0.0101340655,0.008038566,0.0028095385,0.0036487665,0.0029866714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011504421,0.000051245577,0.0019383226,0.0002075818,0.00006220296,0.00020174374,0.00087169046,0.0030351637,0.0009844975,0.9366062,0.013037275,0.04288899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040224753,0.000030550586,0.00059277104,0.00014027626,0.000026051674,0.00007592681,0.00037731644,0.008312992,0.0010934817,0.95905745,0.03022966,0.000023266717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004859875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069725355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01524036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029932589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004295572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053552628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255131847","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2020.17","title":"Humane Driving","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Animal welfare; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Focus (optics); Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Law and economics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.04474193502420136,"score_gpt":0.36241723053700653,"score_spread":0.31767529551280516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255131847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021333707,0.0034108597,0.012042394,0.03303714,0.001311283,0.00009371249,0.00031908602,0.00014335748,0.9283084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72940874,0.006048838,0.006877601,0.016123407,0.00069900224,0.00014662437,0.00058674923,0.000094251984,0.24001484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974733,0.00070047565,0.00007264983,0.00040267425,0.0009824204,0.00036841293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974287,0.00051211996,0.00017612285,0.00038008936,0.0010535935,0.00044936172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001835347,0.00031283047,0.00019373691,0.0005092375,0.0028869691,0.0033424923,0.00083399564,0.0019259289,0.025430782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005815296,0.00018326276,0.00024547853,0.000294009,0.0039027652,0.0030849134,0.0033748318,0.0015039924,0.0049816337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005447611,0.000116001116,0.008605902,0.00030955012,0.000034402703,0.0006547924,0.011021934,0.0010603173,0.0011356618,0.6694993,0.14103727,0.16647045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039873494,0.000050668234,0.0030392131,0.00018106513,0.000004982776,0.0005689548,0.0038262936,0.00036047894,0.00030068774,0.035782304,0.9558614,0.000020033225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016250843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02255026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025430782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017877189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024157243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085074425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308589887","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.26","title":"Subsidiarity and the Allocation of Governmental Powers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Southampton; McGill University","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Allocative efficiency; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; European union","score_opus":0.026080910621977715,"score_gpt":0.29219534301075056,"score_spread":0.26611443238877286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308589887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13607207,0.0018354257,0.07957531,0.024050318,0.00024101516,0.00012889532,0.000070083915,0.000066928194,0.75796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98765904,0.00019773484,0.0032463202,0.00070509885,0.00007924173,0.00006099454,0.000014761214,0.0000184237,0.008018337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99108946,0.0046216855,0.00032492194,0.001433681,0.0013154183,0.0012148715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914625,0.00374506,0.0010733609,0.0016203534,0.0014890733,0.00060957053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010237874,0.0002998721,0.0006521776,0.0018774512,0.0047666687,0.0057177143,0.001212089,0.0028620127,0.0063101947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012906724,0.0003606105,0.0005838108,0.0011265948,0.035261184,0.0060061943,0.0072598183,0.0040918784,0.00065683405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002336387,0.0000020644632,0.000111301175,0.0000033095027,0.0000013326114,0.000008612118,0.00022959021,0.000098686396,0.000023725066,0.998798,0.00020699085,0.00051409437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017861468,0.000010988067,0.0005549595,0.000045852477,0.000007002614,0.00004013216,0.00042514887,0.0008678614,0.0001291037,0.9851694,0.012724719,0.0000068949234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004622367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041106865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010237874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008452106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005919248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061324596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315465013","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.25","title":"Discretion in the Automated Administrative State","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal and Policy Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Administrative discretion; Agency (philosophy); State (computer science); Legislature; Argument (complex analysis); Judicial discretion; State agency; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Administration (probate law); Judicial review; Algorithm","score_opus":0.0780024987535169,"score_gpt":0.41475526292838305,"score_spread":0.33675276417486616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315465013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16867298,0.0012209297,0.15648285,0.042663876,0.00032351783,0.00014943734,0.00020077528,0.0003224118,0.6299633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898281,0.0001089354,0.0047020097,0.00063986954,0.00009793789,0.00005697411,0.0000207283,0.000034078465,0.004511345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98110116,0.008958945,0.000862432,0.0021792527,0.004421001,0.002477308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630907,0.01959228,0.0035164831,0.0072733914,0.004832631,0.0016943944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016910005,0.00022628524,0.00050562766,0.0020882247,0.0066790055,0.014229515,0.0016506017,0.0031274743,0.0054580322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030971292,0.000485212,0.00061338185,0.0014956924,0.036982827,0.009162798,0.0067434725,0.0042513395,0.00063171797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000579106,0.0000057267703,0.00022056256,0.000004860479,0.0000019074866,0.000015654845,0.00075816433,0.00074162486,0.00003867346,0.99617505,0.00043573914,0.0015962551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018992203,0.000012010398,0.0005393259,0.000057751105,0.000007233218,0.000017869006,0.0007715481,0.0034724434,0.00024280362,0.97524047,0.019598005,0.00002158571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0148246335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010046074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016910005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009450912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012412001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08942968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317884482","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.29","title":"Theorizing Access to Civil Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European University Institute","keywords":"Economic Justice; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Underpinning; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; State (computer science); Law; Frame (networking); Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.1130655748367023,"score_gpt":0.44688745876339186,"score_spread":0.33382188392668954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317884482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039594073,0.003011723,0.050501116,0.06770817,0.00028504618,0.00008864423,0.00011559106,0.000047170997,0.83864844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819374,0.0009990422,0.0026739961,0.0025612225,0.00019066762,0.000086702275,0.00004166373,0.000030001993,0.011479238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99208635,0.0038815546,0.00019971243,0.0009470683,0.0017079515,0.0011772863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925073,0.004617104,0.00047037113,0.0008128904,0.000941827,0.0006504866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007882779,0.00041259296,0.0004879466,0.0028820168,0.0058802213,0.009130722,0.0023399075,0.005108887,0.012727951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014440467,0.00027087968,0.0006177824,0.0023144798,0.06886231,0.01267197,0.012378735,0.005303756,0.00061312324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.772117e-7,0.000002550798,0.00005395322,0.000005312194,8.6778255e-7,0.000013571115,0.0007202381,0.000080096506,0.0000073462315,0.99857855,0.00022179459,0.00031499536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004649941,0.0000031990805,0.00010514164,0.000061346014,0.0000032082646,0.000023451168,0.0013253815,0.00038029897,0.000030427529,0.98714197,0.010917946,0.0000030605213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02000661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0107488595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02000661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011978467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008313644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08691025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376280060","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.8","title":"Public Law’s Cerberus: A Three-Headed Approach to <i>Charter</i> Rights-Limiting Administrative Decisions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Charter; Limiting; Guard (computer science); Jurisprudence; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.17849941339155584,"score_gpt":0.3406026480060538,"score_spread":0.16210323461449794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376280060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0499307,0.0016590997,0.12739922,0.20307648,0.00072835514,0.00028303018,0.00013850286,0.00031097358,0.6164737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9551488,0.0003334941,0.02343154,0.0077345874,0.0002108573,0.00007929946,0.000030361725,0.000066041815,0.012965107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.982685,0.0072585586,0.00055645284,0.0018214058,0.004718469,0.0029600475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98781514,0.005321909,0.0009307186,0.0012791061,0.003651188,0.0010019399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019100418,0.00052676693,0.0008965881,0.0038654117,0.011605236,0.017243352,0.0037926391,0.008046669,0.004521565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018213598,0.0006358339,0.0011397321,0.0017136412,0.070491955,0.008193406,0.0059475726,0.012223691,0.0005753691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033865608,0.000004972688,0.00006895712,0.0000046032715,0.0000014763991,0.000028911414,0.001156466,0.00017732156,0.000027992897,0.99603194,0.0012079676,0.0012860477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015970982,0.000013262258,0.00023107555,0.00009611382,0.000015374793,0.00004454648,0.0026478546,0.0029341981,0.00032110407,0.9575429,0.036102857,0.00003474584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16893551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20638973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83106446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04085607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0559114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33590436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376866467","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.7","title":"Rights Talk and Constitutional Emotivism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Conflation; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Epistemology; Constitutional law; Law; Sociology; Sentence; Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.029012186724913906,"score_gpt":0.29176429331943665,"score_spread":0.26275210659452275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376866467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18155693,0.0029528732,0.041678056,0.04411285,0.0006657456,0.000042888092,0.000051560128,0.0001056187,0.7288335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948808,0.00020399378,0.00067877996,0.00094653014,0.000085406005,0.000012306729,0.000006393994,0.000013576966,0.0031723268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99263483,0.0050488017,0.00014896608,0.0005874044,0.001045505,0.0005345002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928033,0.0050359378,0.0006434171,0.0005628073,0.0005265042,0.00042807875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006360773,0.00026019613,0.00030340758,0.0012313536,0.003960942,0.007199576,0.000751446,0.002055839,0.0042582653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009228552,0.00016835182,0.00029147702,0.00055786385,0.04000846,0.0067678373,0.007074881,0.0037173638,0.00030060147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008162631,0.0000070844694,0.0002007515,0.000018552471,0.0000021933856,0.00004275963,0.012771147,0.00006816379,0.00015282875,0.9839665,0.00055253523,0.0022092485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012891263,0.000021357318,0.0010363298,0.00014632443,0.000008871525,0.000112523434,0.014581641,0.0005958933,0.00052650954,0.9230073,0.05992656,0.000023759872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010720709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008183862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007199576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032643247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013547526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03363937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386170259","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.11","title":"Aspiration and Reality in Legal Education David Sandomierski","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Internet privacy; Computer security; Political science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05579560268917917,"score_gpt":0.4047973337528322,"score_spread":0.34900173106365306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386170259","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013411594,0.10566454,0.002487309,0.55580544,0.0022572274,0.000021479722,0.00006318066,0.000031313226,0.32025787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7080119,0.13242003,0.0025868164,0.036577363,0.0017648861,0.00007241633,0.000059936057,0.00007355056,0.1184331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982591,0.0009965777,0.00005067032,0.00014610509,0.0003952489,0.00015228949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973603,0.0016605248,0.00010968315,0.000055654782,0.0003656546,0.0004481254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002593291,0.00025601327,0.00041338112,0.0011362842,0.0043207556,0.0070546237,0.00044054494,0.0019399186,0.0057438463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004421322,0.0002748404,0.00014190831,0.0009995787,0.013842972,0.0067694597,0.0030079973,0.004933046,0.0010835568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015234675,0.00004031576,0.00057571527,0.00009553143,0.0000038646012,0.000067446694,0.005544541,0.00020208099,0.00006102105,0.89963377,0.07046972,0.02329075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016858356,0.00001999413,0.0012445697,0.0005436166,0.0000045325255,0.000102125436,0.00903322,0.00039951075,0.00009165637,0.68246543,0.30604693,0.00003150009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01770354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024951752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9950081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004707767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03621894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387730473","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.17","title":"The Rise and Fall of Private Law - Reciprocal Freedom: Private Law and Public Right Ernest J. Weinrib","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Reciprocal; Private law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025388265958959277,"score_gpt":0.2868824142261665,"score_spread":0.26149414826720724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387730473","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017117297,0.030863654,0.0069642817,0.50408435,0.0011989379,0.000024370993,0.00010677052,0.000052347328,0.43958807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8756499,0.01776663,0.003399833,0.0239794,0.0010502968,0.000059505943,0.0000367994,0.00009172486,0.07796592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663347,0.0012494139,0.00010145538,0.0005827245,0.0009332849,0.0004997487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948127,0.0035692109,0.00024977286,0.00040777508,0.0005973807,0.00036319182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045880345,0.00020987811,0.000520008,0.0009985836,0.006502412,0.0109092,0.000637481,0.005719013,0.00616188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009432823,0.00031961375,0.00032661788,0.0010599131,0.03760632,0.010874468,0.0040437793,0.008412556,0.0007122393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042745164,0.000003214142,0.00004393561,0.0000065266104,7.2283615e-7,0.00001343209,0.00043089024,0.00004695043,0.00002403149,0.9913829,0.005743804,0.002299309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063712164,0.0000031227582,0.000275593,0.00007482457,0.0000018453483,0.000025859374,0.00052471895,0.00017570528,0.00007460761,0.9507588,0.04806942,0.000009072829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03382678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040574323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03382678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008827811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007835752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06725973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391752890","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.2","title":"Defending Dworkin’s One-System Anti-Positivism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal positivism; Morality; Opposition (politics); Positivism; Jurisprudence; Epistemology; Politics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.039561452306466155,"score_gpt":0.2970963619715947,"score_spread":0.2575349096651286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391752890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07138174,0.0020008301,0.24983506,0.20949236,0.0024560022,0.00020387571,0.00020548434,0.00023656199,0.46418813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9490131,0.0005769253,0.02779865,0.0102975145,0.0006822111,0.0001780771,0.000041809544,0.00011503872,0.011296682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886487,0.0056361617,0.0003759011,0.0020486827,0.0025013331,0.000789193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98707205,0.0064102067,0.0010262225,0.0022451708,0.0025594614,0.00068689155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014316513,0.0007165202,0.0010072436,0.0027876983,0.0051639867,0.007942043,0.0029080522,0.0047652186,0.0031991561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015998732,0.00055972586,0.00091700634,0.0013041421,0.044889938,0.009185461,0.0071879937,0.010447989,0.00065348635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007024135,0.000007170848,0.00006737998,0.000009428015,0.0000025952127,0.000016149495,0.00045731213,0.00006302086,0.000035175985,0.9977016,0.00080360606,0.0008295392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001574055,0.0000062299773,0.00007060913,0.000021931444,0.0000035551614,0.000020394005,0.00017855842,0.0006578882,0.000119613745,0.9907425,0.008156412,0.0000065331956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046118833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045953966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014316513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008414799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050568352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07571387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399160098","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.7","title":"Democracy and the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Charter; Political science; Legislature; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Law and economics; Skepticism; Context (archaeology); Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024353848710301627,"score_gpt":0.30063889887322603,"score_spread":0.27628505016292443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399160098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05030139,0.003342002,0.008539055,0.035796486,0.0004184171,0.000055804005,0.00010850539,0.00003776395,0.9014006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783756,0.0006856701,0.00068648503,0.0032303592,0.00012598521,0.00002045575,0.000035855242,0.00001525565,0.016824475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463415,0.0014138318,0.00013194211,0.00051791774,0.0018518477,0.0014503085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993842,0.0028089117,0.0006287207,0.0005914779,0.001749502,0.00037938356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004154961,0.000159462,0.00029594667,0.0011052544,0.006671026,0.005296232,0.00074200175,0.002139236,0.006513619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01223214,0.00016937392,0.00026380664,0.0012192456,0.024549952,0.0024199695,0.0024006264,0.0044467812,0.00031806686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019258964,0.0000017811664,0.00020203482,0.000004124388,6.1626e-7,0.000018912478,0.00037777267,0.000061831575,0.000022074415,0.9963665,0.0013152694,0.0016272557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016131491,0.000018746437,0.0039384263,0.00018878565,0.000013610882,0.00008740968,0.0015943669,0.0006569351,0.00030439196,0.7828752,0.21027797,0.000028036595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24758282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26103425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7524172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013104845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019999586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49228346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403807679","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.19","title":"Marital Contracts on the Fault Lines: A Liberal Inquiry","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Bar-Ilan University; McGill University","keywords":"Fault (geology); Political science; Psychology; Business; Geology; Seismology","score_opus":0.04678743187483218,"score_gpt":0.3290234045316248,"score_spread":0.2822359726567926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403807679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3815693,0.0031956194,0.02038983,0.17867018,0.00021166723,0.0000755077,0.000052811592,0.000020172507,0.41581494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99589705,0.0002939227,0.00043261933,0.0019468843,0.000050388993,0.0000111711815,0.000003858787,0.0000033306533,0.0013607779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836068,0.010535142,0.00033860092,0.0008018166,0.0030559776,0.001661599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96069974,0.030948712,0.0019021771,0.0019641502,0.0029335974,0.0015516976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0176362,0.00019348085,0.00055886444,0.0022326612,0.011423092,0.010369624,0.0020402467,0.006247864,0.003951201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03211508,0.00034740442,0.00038092077,0.0020548364,0.07948335,0.014023769,0.008941335,0.009459517,0.00017456482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027839603,0.000008149977,0.0003098904,0.0000043948007,9.2459675e-7,0.00005180769,0.010875148,0.00007545663,0.000015399033,0.9870926,0.00024228562,0.0013212875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001039966,0.000011657757,0.0010045863,0.00013385207,0.0000041425496,0.00009279083,0.0372723,0.0009634818,0.000093448434,0.9389494,0.021448446,0.000015460022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01406286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011247275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0176362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013611351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00831178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098757744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403807700","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.11","title":"The Liberal Case for Community Land Trusts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University; Université François-Rabelais; Tel Aviv University","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04959892804806369,"score_gpt":0.3373374258143671,"score_spread":0.2877384977663034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403807700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3293795,0.0008668714,0.020444416,0.0732403,0.00033108945,0.000118694574,0.00007541953,0.000078890254,0.5754648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99211067,0.000044831933,0.00032769117,0.0010785974,0.000037624748,0.000015482334,0.00000511524,0.0000053382482,0.0063746558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908179,0.003501925,0.0001992985,0.00090078375,0.0016773504,0.002902752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880574,0.0035174706,0.0010873845,0.0016064824,0.0023995826,0.003331786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070329793,0.00015166598,0.00030906027,0.00076592265,0.008708584,0.008455004,0.0011184908,0.0057666483,0.0066682836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016603172,0.0002974802,0.00033919295,0.000604763,0.023494374,0.005129176,0.0071046078,0.005573135,0.0004987638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061994315,0.000010522182,0.0004247658,0.000004803148,0.0000019375643,0.000111804475,0.0012985851,0.00014769314,0.000054452317,0.9951953,0.0014553337,0.0012886308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006457332,0.000055306915,0.0018699091,0.0001445354,0.000016189337,0.00031246693,0.0070702033,0.0036424533,0.00043445083,0.8629683,0.12337147,0.000050116578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035122484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038695678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035122484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008564698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008180745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06983608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404360679","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.18","title":"<i>Freedom Under the Private Law</i> Allan Beever","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Allan variance; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027153196812584712,"score_gpt":0.30937677465607993,"score_spread":0.2822235778434952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404360679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001863557,0.037788495,0.0012545381,0.32236952,0.0050948267,0.000028072796,0.00021540125,0.00007085798,0.6313147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10545711,0.027742842,0.0016208785,0.09694727,0.002284553,0.0000706762,0.00017133231,0.00019732345,0.765508],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991634,0.00020021464,0.000029864214,0.00012517716,0.00034822675,0.00013306741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990932,0.00051775685,0.000041761505,0.000050614086,0.0001807413,0.00011584311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009731761,0.00028458115,0.00032845334,0.0005054869,0.005934143,0.0041580833,0.0007066288,0.0041585104,0.018882629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028341329,0.00026534463,0.00021150953,0.00067011453,0.004694305,0.0046527907,0.0014021765,0.0051062577,0.0035146852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008743526,0.000004874699,0.00007391037,0.00004126423,0.0000017571807,0.000046929017,0.00070436107,0.00004103822,0.00007921073,0.36543396,0.62530965,0.008254264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040010473,0.0000030244319,0.0004931791,0.00015234391,0.0000026778937,0.0000679528,0.00062629685,0.000074645504,0.00019691112,0.076221436,0.92214566,0.00001195235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10770605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25608122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10770605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057039056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005233385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21415824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406479780","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.23","title":"Motivating Reasons, Moral Culpability, and Criminal Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Israel Science Foundation; University of Toronto; Hebrew University of Jerusalem","keywords":"Culpability; Law; Criminal law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03619088648613898,"score_gpt":0.2800855356902452,"score_spread":0.2438946492041062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406479780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16722606,0.004767363,0.033610895,0.08835959,0.00039181145,0.000075313066,0.000067793306,0.00007260367,0.70542854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99356925,0.00044023208,0.0016094354,0.0016597676,0.00006608121,0.00001840921,0.000008400858,0.000005592364,0.0026228386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538606,0.002570956,0.00012907591,0.00038913367,0.0009767745,0.00054793706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98656833,0.0074968273,0.0021091201,0.0006661453,0.0019107431,0.0012488427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063922266,0.00033459775,0.0004214375,0.0019383323,0.0036974733,0.006324782,0.0008849828,0.0044017257,0.005517316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01738129,0.00025136935,0.00042418932,0.0009588393,0.031949107,0.0034829676,0.0028015065,0.0036724845,0.00040018224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003888968,0.000012097894,0.000527419,0.000010900744,0.000003674315,0.000030796895,0.00061702705,0.00011162628,0.000034384575,0.99656904,0.0006788819,0.0014002508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011604959,0.000009378659,0.0019073905,0.000056449822,0.000006170028,0.000054996006,0.0012384319,0.00052505697,0.00009709145,0.9849045,0.0111749135,0.000014012116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007231826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009268687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007231826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050463355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043960474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03661394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410508113","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.6","title":"Political Legitimacy, Judicial Review, and the Legislative Override","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Legitimacy; Legislature; Politics; Political science; Judicial review; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.016584028814165323,"score_gpt":0.3208468177391687,"score_spread":0.30426278892500336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410508113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14825743,0.0036787982,0.045018747,0.121364094,0.0007037185,0.00025809347,0.00007291812,0.00013899524,0.6805071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873788,0.0002704062,0.0041528307,0.0026079116,0.0002522863,0.00007998446,0.000011965884,0.000027889946,0.00521805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91335565,0.040421195,0.0028391066,0.0067514195,0.03152451,0.005108194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75727844,0.17558803,0.017162908,0.015396844,0.029903704,0.0046699923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059575494,0.000207744,0.0009822494,0.00511239,0.010273251,0.014972418,0.002014953,0.0066578845,0.0043271855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15133642,0.0006843931,0.00050849444,0.0024331291,0.0444924,0.0073466892,0.0063305325,0.0076587177,0.00049712864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007616044,0.00001829311,0.0007276879,0.000013720036,0.0000052741016,0.00003394521,0.00087611953,0.00017868543,0.00009135659,0.99370956,0.00090650574,0.0034312215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001182369,0.000044091194,0.0032011447,0.00022652188,0.000038133774,0.00010552696,0.0011351083,0.002890285,0.0010579999,0.9510485,0.040081996,0.000052498137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01984847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026077932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059575494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015027305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026843224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31506914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413363261","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10041","title":"Courts as Multivocal Group Agents","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Psychology; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.025813805437759185,"score_gpt":0.24353648295947286,"score_spread":0.21772267752171368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413363261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2768445,0.0016845748,0.20823537,0.036455747,0.00047338763,0.00041936562,0.00019284443,0.00021543255,0.47547874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695072,0.00019868308,0.013826072,0.0010494944,0.00016638503,0.000109655215,0.000026266553,0.00002454135,0.015091555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98889005,0.005896268,0.00043958455,0.0015193679,0.0021932966,0.0010614583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98572403,0.0068197036,0.0015448517,0.0020885183,0.00220662,0.0016161606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008874413,0.00030118955,0.0005831812,0.0018399591,0.0046143048,0.0099748215,0.0017102154,0.005267879,0.011141733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014787929,0.0004311545,0.0005605996,0.0010598616,0.011270664,0.0070771016,0.006393186,0.0039187064,0.0008952356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007524148,0.000010958747,0.00035372452,0.000008111774,0.0000071697937,0.00008553239,0.00066619774,0.00088908063,0.00010885226,0.995204,0.000543302,0.0021156652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025675516,0.000017587483,0.00018971022,0.000032574695,0.000012334941,0.00006162966,0.00052458205,0.007148512,0.00015323414,0.97320426,0.018616078,0.0000138041005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044371258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003199249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011141733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052914466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003239298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046932936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414071278","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10052","title":"The Subjects of Tort Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Delict; Doctrine; Private law; Subject (documents); Public law; Civil law (Civil law)","score_opus":0.016434396882441093,"score_gpt":0.3204014645644135,"score_spread":0.3039670676819724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414071278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021728251,0.010226003,0.039441116,0.044906557,0.00070244394,0.00018855622,0.0002031578,0.00008820293,0.8825158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89215946,0.008823802,0.012396179,0.008655124,0.002317317,0.0003455222,0.00021249054,0.00012409272,0.074965924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927563,0.0037553885,0.00026835263,0.00093870924,0.001662464,0.00061868934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99376124,0.0035620735,0.00052087725,0.00082833524,0.00087344076,0.00045396882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073796236,0.00052992906,0.0006961271,0.0028120165,0.0065616746,0.0119126355,0.0013448418,0.00587546,0.011224365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072801122,0.00044719072,0.00061541406,0.002034393,0.060170244,0.009567945,0.00435819,0.006395613,0.00140365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.859745e-7,0.0000024545784,0.000039018578,0.0000046200566,5.6705943e-7,0.000007084692,0.00080402213,0.000018331675,0.00002070878,0.998111,0.000479481,0.00051195023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052871687,0.000007708736,0.0002061941,0.000115417904,0.0000031080742,0.000030527455,0.0012154864,0.00011959461,0.00005474276,0.9218381,0.07639926,0.0000045144734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008272494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051146294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0119126355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00867157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007451969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062916934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414775782","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10044","title":"Defending the Juridical","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Morality; Private law; Distributive property; Normative; Philosophy of law; Order (exchange); State (computer science); Scope (computer science)","score_opus":0.017567693185092288,"score_gpt":0.3129356757690425,"score_spread":0.29536798258395025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414775782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019776568,0.004181832,0.10026465,0.15902634,0.002575136,0.00010251788,0.00013225466,0.00013444606,0.7138063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91911316,0.0013188074,0.016358878,0.015796361,0.0016674355,0.00021598158,0.000052970674,0.00010329381,0.04537319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837372,0.008379797,0.00058149104,0.0021640707,0.004099506,0.0010378386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98990977,0.005564091,0.0005909681,0.0015761314,0.0017177886,0.00064118125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021220595,0.0005412158,0.0008891594,0.0018496272,0.0061110146,0.011486861,0.002950891,0.009654675,0.005701388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025377909,0.0006476414,0.00067478063,0.00090509804,0.051573526,0.012371514,0.01034607,0.0146517735,0.0011296673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018428603,0.0000018380914,0.000016860095,0.000003555219,7.354417e-7,0.000004574793,0.0003660294,0.000034861212,0.000011746492,0.99811316,0.00092411437,0.00052075606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013075735,0.000007766321,0.000054597647,0.00008739127,0.0000043073,0.000015550937,0.00048551822,0.00041193765,0.00012435595,0.9569467,0.041838456,0.00001038343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006117807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061082523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021220595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075702164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009771434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112226546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415507993","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10057","title":"Underuse of the Override","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Presumption; Comity; Charter; Supreme court; Judicial review; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Legislative history","score_opus":0.021674066433417596,"score_gpt":0.30086886121503714,"score_spread":0.27919479478161957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415507993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15480506,0.0024059475,0.026389882,0.04224665,0.000771202,0.00014843358,0.00013281526,0.00016798086,0.7729321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97604513,0.00029324094,0.0018793729,0.008011816,0.00019441984,0.00005187875,0.00002320566,0.000060354265,0.013440626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9241523,0.019605571,0.0038298576,0.009502893,0.034718577,0.0081907995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9392786,0.023907395,0.0047331024,0.009675356,0.01933816,0.0030674469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027565101,0.0003447153,0.0010657574,0.0020802608,0.010335412,0.010142239,0.002261271,0.005852518,0.005092904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06348278,0.0006638128,0.00046930477,0.0017045991,0.03172822,0.0050350768,0.0071945027,0.011037541,0.0006432373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002188475,0.000016086527,0.0020456067,0.000038365808,0.000018287816,0.00015582789,0.0077888663,0.0002278678,0.0006715369,0.975416,0.0044012167,0.009198539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006743438,0.00016594988,0.01627749,0.0008976776,0.00015132593,0.000721394,0.016518297,0.0027378495,0.0061598183,0.57578903,0.38027284,0.00024095672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13370131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1809121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9843876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015612452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02896786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2658462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417315006","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10060","title":"The Declaratory Theory of Judicial Law-Making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University College London","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Adjudication; Positivism; Natural (archaeology); Legal positivism; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.024187802881114162,"score_gpt":0.3113280521631375,"score_spread":0.28714024928202336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417315006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02655836,0.0032218324,0.18432479,0.032542497,0.0011075187,0.00015183595,0.00018158698,0.00011125858,0.7518003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9539957,0.0011665863,0.017206738,0.0023260242,0.00086487253,0.0001693075,0.00008839549,0.00004762693,0.02413472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861055,0.006425448,0.0007883491,0.0019709114,0.0036427316,0.0010670982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804648,0.011739595,0.0014869088,0.0027699568,0.002869081,0.000669596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01764081,0.00038620163,0.0006714218,0.0018873295,0.0041054254,0.011529155,0.0027241458,0.004863407,0.0075704525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018501867,0.0004240822,0.0010618854,0.0014187827,0.031149473,0.009013888,0.003622355,0.006636091,0.00088792504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.030706e-7,0.0000014090538,0.000011217305,0.0000028743957,6.228214e-7,0.0000043650307,0.00008238078,0.00008614885,0.0000067054957,0.9993492,0.00020136988,0.0002528764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009723026,0.0000027004812,0.00002560963,0.000021804824,0.0000025178647,0.000011338082,0.000064548105,0.00059243117,0.000042816417,0.99313825,0.006084309,0.00000384925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004337161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030753564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99566287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00552895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065010777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09329468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W47564605","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003799","title":"The Left and the Question of Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Faith; Authoritarianism; Law; Parliament; Realm; Classical liberalism; Liberalism; Left-wing politics; Political science; Sociology; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01494727644993122,"score_gpt":0.3079403150364865,"score_spread":0.2929930385865553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W47564605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036919978,0.0243652,0.011110084,0.28342348,0.00083715003,0.0000120541035,0.000053523516,0.00007066337,0.6432079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94925624,0.0034143706,0.0013651992,0.016354028,0.00076292804,0.00003156626,0.00002631282,0.000067249064,0.028722038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946162,0.0029248141,0.00012313109,0.00067246443,0.00090294646,0.00076051085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952561,0.0031661068,0.0002487572,0.00043885203,0.00043881894,0.0004512842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047964,0.00023331531,0.00053238834,0.0013420333,0.013512151,0.011650639,0.0010732715,0.0048652673,0.0061744987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078327395,0.00026921232,0.00034022753,0.0010247314,0.070344314,0.013972874,0.007013479,0.009197604,0.0008144854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002491374,0.0000021317412,0.000052147738,0.0000052811392,5.108062e-7,0.000016657217,0.0017045842,0.000020227153,0.000013337978,0.9951315,0.0016360295,0.0014151742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004758413,0.0000049703085,0.00011529712,0.00007230036,0.0000014417927,0.000031095195,0.0019636285,0.000111079666,0.000045733752,0.9288848,0.06875963,0.000005319157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019745344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016772691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019745344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011264533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008107531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081730306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128504655","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10049","title":"On the Possibility and the Form of Acquired Rights to External Things","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University; University of Surrey","keywords":"Rest (music); Root (linguistics); Lying; Action (physics); Human rights; Practical reason","score_opus":0.021248925732625618,"score_gpt":0.2517292418604598,"score_spread":0.23048031612783418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128504655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059774887,0.0023749233,0.08085529,0.017999874,0.000197823,0.00006140491,0.00016276015,0.00007363314,0.8384994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777648,0.0005323982,0.004391492,0.0009652367,0.00016720028,0.000086183136,0.000047517206,0.000032777072,0.016012454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908223,0.0047513605,0.00036152048,0.0015477648,0.0016646808,0.0008522726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99305177,0.0035995939,0.0004389736,0.001796709,0.00078434113,0.00032865175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008529353,0.00039751938,0.0007135886,0.0014081615,0.004063635,0.0104247015,0.0016889595,0.004528488,0.0093440665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008314127,0.0005589997,0.00087603804,0.0009066064,0.05897321,0.01681661,0.00973621,0.007760679,0.0008701113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025514857,0.0000020830462,0.00002492577,0.0000037497227,0.0000012133152,0.0000147088,0.00025157456,0.0000383943,0.000028257477,0.9991756,0.00011321687,0.0003437305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006873628,0.000005761745,0.000055973116,0.000029551284,0.0000031238535,0.000046930767,0.00021207843,0.00018780222,0.00012661004,0.9918622,0.0074575297,0.0000054938705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014605743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010959232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0104247015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038488698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018102635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04510808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}