{"meta":{"query_hash":"1325816d12ec","filters":{"venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy"},"cohort_total":182,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":182,"exported":182,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1325816d12ec","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Canadian+Journal+of+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W117991978","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2003.10716556","title":"James O. Young, Art and Knowledge. London: Routledge2001.Pp. 180.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.038099696943183624,"score_gpt":0.2639860751674464,"score_spread":0.22588637822426275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W117991978","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045806775,0.9138403,0.0014187538,0.011851373,0.0019685884,0.000021427923,0.0009088579,0.0001152759,0.06941731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016589873,0.77278155,0.0040044254,0.0034254724,0.0019374668,0.00012269866,0.0009169023,0.00038301942,0.19983864],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992084,0.00017823059,0.00011787537,0.00011315064,0.00028851346,0.00009378925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837947,0.0007341417,0.0001916911,0.00012275427,0.00042927617,0.00014259027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012713711,0.0024553079,0.0016651842,0.0052812714,0.0034089002,0.006376186,0.0016925555,0.0040367413,0.072936825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033759691,0.0020719662,0.00086521107,0.0075597875,0.0045297625,0.01445156,0.0024059503,0.0033859096,0.037096176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005158312,0.000023065482,0.00035096498,0.001508682,0.000020793956,0.00021822481,0.0037138574,0.00022959449,0.00024018357,0.04764362,0.77919185,0.16680759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056538365,0.000005327267,0.0008134183,0.0017238978,0.000010714893,0.00022634344,0.0011009444,0.000037487134,0.00010965365,0.021488128,0.97446465,0.000013851021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055528678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1631715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072936825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047765095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005623502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24399799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509185071","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.857131","title":"Love: self-propagation, self-preservation, or<i>ekstasis</i>?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Ideal (ethics); Philosophy; Ethical egoism; Economic Justice; Interpersonal communication; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03834628381784829,"score_gpt":0.22317320444533073,"score_spread":0.18482692062748243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509185071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16466247,0.0073998994,0.023370402,0.04128179,0.0009064951,0.000042458076,0.000054119304,0.00007564228,0.76220673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876473,0.0007229582,0.0005859794,0.000932571,0.00016043667,0.000014599742,0.000009114433,0.000012632746,0.009914347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998885,0.000591425,0.00003886641,0.00013408507,0.00017237302,0.00017833711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988349,0.00036660038,0.0002343485,0.00028154827,0.00013605609,0.00014654068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016082802,0.00018562762,0.00021319935,0.00038887045,0.002063147,0.0058369716,0.0005248229,0.0018563502,0.0036749437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036503961,0.0001478692,0.00019255475,0.0005703486,0.01692125,0.0072949873,0.0028708975,0.0019337881,0.00053977483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021307125,0.000015198818,0.0008007149,0.000026676691,0.000003442448,0.00010207221,0.012226969,0.00005269824,0.00012616381,0.9749391,0.0026084797,0.009077158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016070675,0.000054172106,0.0025857538,0.00015908969,0.000008363796,0.00081125175,0.025569214,0.000775771,0.0004958335,0.89058876,0.0789109,0.00002483119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009857706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068284676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058369716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010642974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006047546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012293935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510964088","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.774846","title":"The use of useless knowledge: Bergson against the pragmatists","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Antithesis; Intuition; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of mind; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.050369098613798395,"score_gpt":0.2117547010551275,"score_spread":0.1613856024413291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510964088","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0465597,0.018241225,0.0383403,0.48345882,0.0016637561,0.00006819733,0.000058542933,0.00019876625,0.4114107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9386589,0.0024768387,0.0072889794,0.027797837,0.0005806259,0.00010420708,0.000019242023,0.00019233998,0.022880962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9720467,0.019001279,0.00094816403,0.002489266,0.0040710536,0.0014434768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9621637,0.02791833,0.0021458976,0.0030719002,0.0037037053,0.0009964177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028187,0.00070453994,0.0009438588,0.0024379895,0.010072224,0.015081846,0.0020823148,0.00980971,0.00206424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03774036,0.0006952202,0.0006392,0.0013550931,0.09559897,0.022427782,0.007941138,0.015039337,0.0006031478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000101431615,0.00000547621,0.00007239115,0.000023248194,0.000003971187,0.000045898825,0.013616243,0.0000681845,0.000036067,0.9795346,0.0037497808,0.0028340365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016158714,0.000015461397,0.000106164705,0.0001756594,0.000007865386,0.000099651406,0.0050723148,0.00033394052,0.0001881573,0.91209173,0.08186356,0.000029232322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012906791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009001361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013441982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008173877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14906883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512819943","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2003.10716538","title":"Hume, a Scottish Socrates?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Content (measure theory); General interest; Philosophy; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04575302338287984,"score_gpt":0.22389817201039658,"score_spread":0.17814514862751674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512819943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034882993,0.014753086,0.00076539913,0.27298036,0.006445144,0.000035642654,0.00026861118,0.0001404,0.6697284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30978307,0.0036004859,0.0004352348,0.076645285,0.0009118807,0.0000182464,0.000078549005,0.00012875188,0.6083985],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811566,0.00077939115,0.000046441564,0.00019529334,0.00032516388,0.0005381033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981731,0.00033869155,0.00013423715,0.00018280746,0.00040007147,0.0007711286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040913248,0.00037775672,0.0004429169,0.00069147727,0.015744299,0.0061077974,0.00066406303,0.0028320893,0.041255176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056606596,0.00023289213,0.00022768657,0.00061995775,0.011924946,0.0044613094,0.0035381299,0.0042047407,0.007825068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012799632,0.00003519006,0.0018194678,0.00010114292,0.000011716687,0.0010682327,0.037555464,0.000041236526,0.00021630207,0.33347008,0.57245964,0.05309353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056471813,0.000017130762,0.0011213176,0.0000864228,0.000002628616,0.00027208994,0.011181649,0.000025311154,0.00011288849,0.0076905806,0.9794688,0.000015466292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061967816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15773037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061967816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004009543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048916526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13801229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513512365","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2010.10716730","title":"Obligation and Advantage in Hobbes' <i>Leviathan</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Covenant; Prudence; Philosophy; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.019850775716241414,"score_gpt":0.21401523493230512,"score_spread":0.1941644592160637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513512365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07581974,0.008351134,0.026481403,0.03809892,0.00073349493,0.000022166534,0.000025385181,0.00003710762,0.85043067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759942,0.0010737559,0.0023835392,0.0025567191,0.00037433126,0.000033541382,0.0000095212445,0.00004067815,0.01753364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973253,0.0012713288,0.00008245501,0.00036216908,0.00053676736,0.00042193595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865204,0.0007573117,0.00013004172,0.00013093572,0.00015502391,0.00017476745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033241527,0.0002853699,0.00033384387,0.0008059001,0.005344072,0.005137337,0.0005598822,0.0020441834,0.0042532254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003563559,0.00021637132,0.00038189287,0.00058530306,0.026579078,0.0072296658,0.0042568278,0.0032870737,0.00042676483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054731527,0.0000037072675,0.00006529322,0.000006938225,8.716284e-7,0.000014650856,0.0019716783,0.000026104455,0.000034443292,0.99613297,0.0005351808,0.0012027835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000896185,0.000017428227,0.00061485945,0.000059364764,0.000004891782,0.000067689776,0.001928552,0.0002190918,0.00014393407,0.92807466,0.06884812,0.000012398316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037580908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041933022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005344072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042044376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001780905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030505478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519794797","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2015.1053677","title":"Ideology, inquiry, and antiquity: a critical notice of Lloyd’s <i>The Ideals of Inquiry: An Ancient History</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Notice; Positivism; Ideology; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Sociology; Comparative history; Philosophy; Social science; History; Law; Political science; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.13807569006421916,"score_gpt":0.3350928061576015,"score_spread":0.19701711609338235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519794797","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02440989,0.10245586,0.004487964,0.7429199,0.0070593534,0.00007428333,0.000043115688,0.000026040514,0.118523605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81346995,0.040258177,0.0039228452,0.09018905,0.011280891,0.00020360292,0.00003560177,0.00014724248,0.040492598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991435,0.00592398,0.00019094483,0.000433501,0.001267585,0.00074895297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892636,0.00836794,0.00050706614,0.00026118287,0.0010097022,0.00059048267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01078847,0.0005593645,0.0008961982,0.00324801,0.01694334,0.014184244,0.0021874905,0.0067311716,0.002113531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010978779,0.0005507481,0.00042479532,0.0028464752,0.07819605,0.013233497,0.006201439,0.012798848,0.00028358607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021095742,0.000024437253,0.00016494667,0.00010466346,0.0000028483678,0.0001718596,0.13837494,0.000056898352,0.00009444732,0.8116929,0.04379742,0.0054935813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024202422,0.000034896217,0.0010116119,0.0010044428,0.0000072327707,0.00020669674,0.09623598,0.0003096046,0.00021965939,0.22834218,0.67255956,0.00004395761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04868897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06116317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04868897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02371517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011777893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17206639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521499787","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.774841","title":"Moral coherence and value pluralism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Pluralism (philosophy); Moral reasoning; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Norm (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10659358407311816,"score_gpt":0.4063576546038145,"score_spread":0.29976407053069637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521499787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11498717,0.007993259,0.22128542,0.16664399,0.0010923343,0.00013154914,0.00008668217,0.00012908968,0.48765057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792677,0.0006131026,0.011411305,0.0033203312,0.00045488885,0.00008486015,0.0000207816,0.000047071968,0.004779866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96482044,0.023956345,0.0009453147,0.0026003732,0.005824068,0.001853547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788632,0.012199319,0.0019624478,0.0027531378,0.0030717512,0.0011501273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02323963,0.0004168838,0.00084023096,0.0017162797,0.007537179,0.009679871,0.0012158505,0.004654918,0.0031280378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027888445,0.000403677,0.0008417472,0.0014957557,0.05807825,0.014752534,0.009567109,0.0070890845,0.0004750931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004276775,0.0000050860813,0.00007915442,0.00001616182,0.000003606104,0.000013790835,0.0015860482,0.00009492021,0.000043696262,0.99597615,0.00038519275,0.0017919319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071722484,0.0000058348683,0.0000625606,0.000027084152,0.0000023537975,0.000013755327,0.00043579497,0.00019591706,0.00005090809,0.99346006,0.0057344595,0.0000040914006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019162382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001493729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02323963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006133457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051618777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523006892","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716583","title":"How to Distinguish Autonomy from Integrity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Suspect; Value (mathematics); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06079187571652715,"score_gpt":0.2361941257216291,"score_spread":0.17540225000510196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523006892","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0110283205,0.009785675,0.049200438,0.55514234,0.008042361,0.00014909075,0.0001539737,0.00027191287,0.3662258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7805796,0.005493435,0.032707743,0.106969334,0.0037718327,0.00052732474,0.00015281329,0.0005941936,0.069203705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768138,0.013362064,0.001330504,0.002001763,0.004308283,0.0021836958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97837514,0.01308824,0.0010392934,0.0019439125,0.0037022831,0.001851169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015308474,0.0009416945,0.0012976805,0.0015018256,0.0075806053,0.011160805,0.0021936065,0.01037053,0.008554686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037221156,0.00065820105,0.00091497233,0.0010530504,0.07933734,0.03575824,0.01008334,0.017270692,0.0040010684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000988036,0.000005166125,0.00012964898,0.00004201851,0.000004738854,0.00007188153,0.007866759,0.000044175595,0.00006572145,0.9733088,0.01417563,0.0042754966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013872777,0.000008936777,0.00021635812,0.00015690914,0.0000049356727,0.00014039366,0.0054355296,0.00014388045,0.00014914075,0.8442799,0.14942499,0.000025079975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010579874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008683215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015308474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065591643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00770083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080959916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534313741","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.857133","title":"Acts, ideas, and objects in Berkeley's metaphysics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Analogy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Identity (music); Perception; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02511545714350636,"score_gpt":0.1850818441438719,"score_spread":0.15996638700036556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534313741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056824494,0.020160172,0.059398312,0.056614384,0.00086848385,0.00007242644,0.0002455514,0.00027900573,0.8055373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9486697,0.0029584353,0.010713276,0.0028317284,0.00041503017,0.00012710833,0.000056307024,0.000089304034,0.034139127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972488,0.0012603657,0.00011907603,0.00034840807,0.00067292625,0.00035039452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982986,0.0010453885,0.00017510225,0.00021119369,0.00016266441,0.00010712016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003148063,0.0004646161,0.00047030274,0.0021577135,0.0049655987,0.0078731375,0.0011443796,0.0037820335,0.0037063514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003354738,0.00048231473,0.0005309218,0.0018029802,0.036547944,0.008539755,0.0029855685,0.0040303026,0.00044883898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003625534,0.000001510431,0.00002772575,0.000007229632,5.608264e-7,0.000007138089,0.0015257818,0.000050079558,0.000010468054,0.99700886,0.0006567233,0.00070021866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000120368,0.000007958487,0.0003973277,0.000061047926,0.000006987504,0.000031301995,0.0011410171,0.00032820186,0.0001170406,0.9486975,0.049184904,0.000014707175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01197568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059727975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01197568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063442155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023213276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0460307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541078292","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2012.981030","title":"Hume, Locke and consciousness","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Introspection; Consciousness; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04432207747198102,"score_gpt":0.2075328743048957,"score_spread":0.16321079683291467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541078292","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006012028,0.016727446,0.00070542074,0.96338385,0.006631249,0.000004249006,0.000021587663,0.000027740343,0.011897228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10135384,0.017776297,0.0022816665,0.81567776,0.023613378,0.00007083189,0.000041181735,0.00016701953,0.039017968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955546,0.0021613427,0.00015326499,0.0007928752,0.0009116409,0.00042625915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98998463,0.0070991344,0.00033999674,0.00057420484,0.0013333486,0.000668739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007441639,0.00090386445,0.0014494874,0.0014039061,0.008938893,0.0101631945,0.0033192192,0.021755189,0.0062442827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014523971,0.0005058238,0.00084938644,0.0016886307,0.039374344,0.018089384,0.0068310974,0.028498959,0.0018081331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028141754,0.0000148795,0.0001279738,0.00009770735,0.000017588338,0.0001232576,0.007592943,0.000082666695,0.000055080654,0.62332183,0.36067325,0.007864646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020191534,0.000012688718,0.00034176523,0.00037629492,0.000009655739,0.0001976116,0.0048613474,0.00012077705,0.00013463249,0.44282115,0.5510699,0.000034057863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023068413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026388247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023068413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064745406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066144937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04697627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551743605","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2004.10716561","title":"Finding Value in Davidson","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Argument (complex analysis); Attribution; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Commit; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Feeling; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04629278078964294,"score_gpt":0.22484921115415216,"score_spread":0.17855643036450922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551743605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037273843,0.0047803028,0.036238097,0.17726737,0.0018760664,0.000040044968,0.000095449854,0.00010168039,0.7423272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93612057,0.0012879068,0.007596907,0.013472217,0.00034077573,0.0000733763,0.000046061003,0.0001246259,0.040937573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947802,0.0031018779,0.00011198903,0.00068513467,0.0008411707,0.00047972865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959692,0.0019429956,0.00019597555,0.0005098838,0.0009966526,0.0003853234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005716882,0.00039837346,0.0007203474,0.0013303186,0.0068904664,0.009995402,0.0011537826,0.003769607,0.0060738223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010221985,0.0003944748,0.00050462614,0.0012942317,0.036699392,0.009592567,0.004998128,0.007842365,0.0010034604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007763547,0.00000365533,0.00008041811,0.000009995685,0.0000025694433,0.000018642475,0.0020062907,0.000059758186,0.000013851032,0.99260616,0.0029841547,0.0022066736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008429158,0.000004470856,0.000050907587,0.000030188223,0.0000028933262,0.000018047955,0.0016760818,0.00019889696,0.000054895034,0.9662647,0.031684365,0.000006055359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01212548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013181847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01212548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010537486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004540539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076455176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554238490","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.827402","title":"Conversation and responsibility, by Michael McKenna, New York, Oxford University Press, 2012, xi + 246 pp, US $74.00, ISBN 978-0-19-974003-1","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03216944823442957,"score_gpt":0.20728046673391312,"score_spread":0.17511101849948355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554238490","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042084017,0.91039133,0.0020942492,0.029939257,0.004050687,0.000015499283,0.00019314417,0.00013288956,0.052762136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017868334,0.7457807,0.0040186765,0.0066055767,0.0037204614,0.00010100423,0.00032074918,0.00027756768,0.22130692],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952066,0.00014545252,0.000044529595,0.00009425153,0.00014801639,0.000047115856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991779,0.00043262518,0.00007603605,0.000039387738,0.00014267777,0.00013139306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015230385,0.0016025809,0.00074957364,0.0017149068,0.0021154305,0.004575182,0.0009050192,0.0019681547,0.03161462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028358207,0.0009901659,0.0004571695,0.0021600544,0.0031121105,0.009173328,0.0020869402,0.0029414769,0.015887892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047549995,0.000021622407,0.00019460612,0.0010464921,0.000015091157,0.00009033994,0.0026289031,0.00016228949,0.00027746847,0.026278786,0.79473925,0.17449756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004851616,0.0000074871323,0.0008008649,0.0009903556,0.000007145894,0.00028984222,0.0011580639,0.00008366304,0.000079529316,0.012180641,0.9843873,0.0000101239675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013034494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034349144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03161462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032873205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037096788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10576147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554450515","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.816177","title":"Completing Rawls's arguments for equal political liberty and its fair value: the argument from self-respect","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Politics; Civil liberties; Law; Primary goods; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06147231165065698,"score_gpt":0.30759687794022605,"score_spread":0.24612456628956908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554450515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03115721,0.010780851,0.04770183,0.1736676,0.0016489378,0.00006180881,0.00011571648,0.000057787463,0.7348083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9092707,0.004560875,0.0114696305,0.01592112,0.0012524375,0.0001276518,0.000048967613,0.00010882242,0.05723975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941497,0.0029407723,0.00015754357,0.00050956884,0.0016407723,0.00060169084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99474144,0.0033206632,0.00029913,0.00042717386,0.000940746,0.00027075195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077267555,0.00045554468,0.00068761647,0.0017692241,0.004564261,0.0049854736,0.0009777434,0.0036311392,0.0067018983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009831086,0.00028016022,0.0011334912,0.0012082164,0.027653668,0.008922834,0.0042984225,0.006435163,0.00082269206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031039242,0.000003826776,0.000018203187,0.000010327782,0.0000015970503,0.000016086362,0.00034665834,0.00006077157,0.000016038493,0.99646425,0.0017987168,0.0012604748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071172026,0.000004511311,0.00006547374,0.000031443236,0.0000023855882,0.000015835234,0.00018800439,0.000143061,0.000051335915,0.9745025,0.024983048,0.000005371153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077751195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006363709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0095361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0095361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004363728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06918961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571029765","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2012.981006","title":"Hume, a Scottish Locke? Comments on Terence Penelhum’s Hume","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Skepticism; Epistemology; Consciousness; Perception; Content (measure theory)","score_opus":0.0719869839664362,"score_gpt":0.23905481641070225,"score_spread":0.16706783244426604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571029765","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046168506,0.0041251644,0.00011515662,0.98030794,0.011498806,0.000004536685,0.000018182738,0.0000139642225,0.0034546116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017167475,0.0027819255,0.00017656513,0.9559912,0.012757949,0.000033026132,0.0000114849345,0.000064709646,0.011015547],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938391,0.0022168532,0.00030453087,0.0010573666,0.0018709725,0.000711238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9613591,0.027914353,0.0012854649,0.0009844535,0.006160203,0.0022963295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011961273,0.00092654326,0.0018319251,0.0012751016,0.012379895,0.0070940433,0.0049708057,0.028142037,0.009436552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054764986,0.0006332938,0.00091700326,0.0018223579,0.014797735,0.011778747,0.005169239,0.038456473,0.002804288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002585437,0.00001304916,0.000112612994,0.00005856449,0.000006505825,0.0004916147,0.002121893,0.000043588185,0.000043023825,0.020157827,0.9739062,0.0030192323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022948105,0.000021712993,0.0005472289,0.00061596936,0.000009395349,0.00053515733,0.007674264,0.00023071156,0.00021029597,0.017717449,0.9723354,0.00007945624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030640127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029803054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030640127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006821777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005375892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06325799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583668695","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.857136","title":"A Humean theory of moral intuition","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"Jenny ja Antti Wihurin Rahasto; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Phenomenology (philosophy); Philosophy; Perception; Moral psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.12233598966201832,"score_gpt":0.24763957646410129,"score_spread":0.12530358680208298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583668695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059231937,0.001651327,0.29224643,0.011564491,0.00047785533,0.0001033475,0.0002256329,0.0002622822,0.63423663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.944083,0.0004804861,0.03545788,0.0018439839,0.00022240316,0.000105347164,0.000072740615,0.00003467295,0.01769953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891365,0.00045923382,0.00003072007,0.00020091754,0.0002960315,0.00009944764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907076,0.00043047976,0.000084744424,0.00015660819,0.00018867922,0.00006869334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013472434,0.0002686147,0.00025295274,0.0008919393,0.0010659453,0.0022177768,0.00067455816,0.0010613322,0.0057219174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003198224,0.00019432744,0.00057511334,0.00032298814,0.008601106,0.0037911534,0.0017400708,0.0014557755,0.00071219215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007496516,0.0000057743864,0.000083662024,0.000022106184,0.0000030396482,0.000024634175,0.00035982986,0.00022031859,0.0001462138,0.9950304,0.0007520286,0.0033444231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007503203,0.000012690432,0.00039347578,0.000017813012,0.0000024197443,0.00007647204,0.00010805463,0.0012653044,0.00013866539,0.99036306,0.0076082973,0.000006260295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079765177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076703547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057219174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014777811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010331627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019141734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592944988","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716589","title":"Memory and Personal Identity in Spinoza","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Personal identity; Identity (music); Philosophy; Epistemology; Human being; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Aesthetics; Self; Theology; Humanity","score_opus":0.041950645943017395,"score_gpt":0.2478387356892383,"score_spread":0.20588808974622091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592944988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11482119,0.013096445,0.0066779377,0.019305995,0.00067941897,0.00003223252,0.00005611863,0.00007576049,0.8452549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97396934,0.0014979803,0.0010232249,0.00088495074,0.00009138047,0.00001601991,0.000016253824,0.00001964662,0.022481214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989058,0.00042811653,0.000049074606,0.00018111076,0.00017135714,0.0002645495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945325,0.00016804897,0.000066029956,0.000089963345,0.00009203301,0.00013078036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013156678,0.0002958279,0.00040862858,0.0013027138,0.010743019,0.011267842,0.00054506643,0.0015890207,0.005520127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014884936,0.00019205292,0.00028524557,0.0009710976,0.024497138,0.00784973,0.0050629475,0.0027077598,0.00058500527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010862394,0.000007917458,0.00022020216,0.000011308155,0.000001858746,0.00008951696,0.008668429,0.00001979681,0.00003171139,0.9876644,0.0007244515,0.0025496003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022525719,0.000020298035,0.0011548972,0.000102558595,0.000015799475,0.00039058737,0.019504987,0.00025511318,0.00016727237,0.8478336,0.13050917,0.000023205836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019446217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020400172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019446217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006137559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025200273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044531345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1710638876","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2002.10716524","title":"Contingent Natures and Virtuous Knowers: Could Epistemology be ‘Gendered’","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Fallacy; Rationality; Philosophy; Feminist epistemology; Reading (process); Social epistemology; Sociology; Feminist philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06499314415635483,"score_gpt":0.2860263510570169,"score_spread":0.22103320690066208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1710638876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077558234,0.009298188,0.0420662,0.42689398,0.0018911313,0.000050053324,0.00009276633,0.000091462876,0.44205794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740616,0.0010531547,0.0031173786,0.010819804,0.000331528,0.000053506774,0.000015004992,0.000056612753,0.010491455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913242,0.0055295117,0.00017050443,0.0008380717,0.001212469,0.0009251834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877412,0.008528411,0.00066742144,0.0014354513,0.0009971046,0.0006304747],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017069247,0.0005539968,0.00066758547,0.0018783379,0.009130908,0.011352249,0.0020590278,0.0063154805,0.0050738133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019708062,0.00038916047,0.0008044845,0.0010880025,0.116419435,0.022777043,0.007895136,0.008358122,0.0005712974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007650102,0.000003355819,0.000105945044,0.000010697326,0.0000018230295,0.00002763623,0.014167209,0.000024264884,0.0000373653,0.9830918,0.00097173045,0.0015505507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009352619,0.000005962407,0.00012769776,0.00007179267,0.0000026413727,0.000031605057,0.015156439,0.00011302448,0.00010305011,0.95327604,0.03109251,0.000009952754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013179589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013549186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009042629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00576144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09027189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1762560894","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2012.981033","title":"The self and the passions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Sympathy; Philosophy; Centrality; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; Presentation (obstetrics); General interest; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.03286595753880151,"score_gpt":0.2168803877898635,"score_spread":0.18401443025106198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1762560894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02971608,0.023572877,0.004521439,0.20862114,0.0033634994,0.000020659474,0.00003876575,0.000081420054,0.7300641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84126014,0.005485354,0.0015398858,0.021610018,0.0013454339,0.000043348107,0.00002184991,0.0001276111,0.12856625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950866,0.003278075,0.00006842149,0.0003299341,0.0007520011,0.00048492776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731207,0.001414477,0.00018040015,0.00025162727,0.00043730994,0.0004041905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004712043,0.0003532742,0.00038015208,0.0010160378,0.010114807,0.00944264,0.0005842914,0.0026816833,0.005040081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068556597,0.00017275827,0.00029965775,0.00053609704,0.051558714,0.0094435215,0.004704781,0.0053626373,0.00088516413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008234954,0.0000055102323,0.000089852714,0.0000117813,0.0000021296153,0.00005398713,0.014051349,0.000023968023,0.00003869005,0.96769845,0.014999716,0.0030162705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011063483,0.000015623214,0.00030763703,0.000176745,0.0000043089035,0.00016185564,0.017127423,0.000093104056,0.00021308845,0.5493282,0.432541,0.000019861374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007505592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0103719095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010114807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055216923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045797145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040062904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1840155493","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.803831","title":"Critical notice for Michail Peramatzis's<i>Priority in Aristotle's Metaphysics</i>, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2011","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); General interest; Contemporary philosophy; Political science; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03402440728527498,"score_gpt":0.21639241914787596,"score_spread":0.182368011862601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1840155493","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039915394,0.01531231,0.000497803,0.9150932,0.040556077,0.000020744657,0.00014120809,0.000042620515,0.027936855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04737194,0.01592239,0.0019685645,0.636712,0.11246692,0.00023281925,0.00021062963,0.0003914738,0.18472321],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976286,0.00059551717,0.0001207978,0.00050206814,0.000860192,0.00029281664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99310726,0.004159531,0.0003088601,0.00025621083,0.0017624889,0.00040575975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042254897,0.001121029,0.000818617,0.0015664517,0.008404954,0.008663147,0.0023724593,0.01566473,0.029195964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017600778,0.00064173195,0.00094528036,0.0014657624,0.012333178,0.012730365,0.0031601184,0.02252085,0.0062683397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013809639,0.0000070212145,0.00003816216,0.00004471602,0.000003661861,0.0000498047,0.00056846166,0.000021641223,0.000043231517,0.09828054,0.8985588,0.0023700963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022660608,0.000008796512,0.00051627617,0.00027896787,0.0000065241393,0.00008382,0.0011442291,0.00009900306,0.00010627719,0.07387193,0.9238307,0.000030800475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033511017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047601078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033511017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008669328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005036441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09767026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905170937","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.870731","title":"Not the optimistic type","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Manitoba","funders":"Ohio State University","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Type (biology)","score_opus":0.03870880881516123,"score_gpt":0.271170317405452,"score_spread":0.23246150859029077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905170937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01596971,0.0038968995,0.14061575,0.07924276,0.0056438656,0.00007569293,0.0008421008,0.00075011223,0.7529631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7828637,0.0030733312,0.03306703,0.020225093,0.0032867612,0.00018200038,0.00057956413,0.00096636405,0.15575619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950191,0.0011796809,0.0002976669,0.0010056648,0.0018633738,0.00063446275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891588,0.0030730222,0.0010189314,0.003174832,0.0026596452,0.00091480085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071533374,0.00058661046,0.00072032097,0.0013247246,0.0052662645,0.009221329,0.0018186718,0.0035401764,0.023618357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024230314,0.0008639737,0.0009192374,0.0011991679,0.007149044,0.022267045,0.005548336,0.005717869,0.0067167417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023502971,0.000003638488,0.00026264996,0.000020563979,0.000006917912,0.000023589311,0.00035613144,0.000052385312,0.000041509367,0.9861265,0.007601348,0.005481286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022212722,0.000011187669,0.00019453773,0.00007070831,0.000021968093,0.0001695056,0.0005661692,0.00049247016,0.00023956383,0.9058562,0.092331536,0.000023841205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032821903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039456487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023618357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027084707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024143448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07901132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905410130","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.816176","title":"On preferring God's non-existence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Monash University","keywords":"Theism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Existence of God; Natural (archaeology); History; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03404541818901036,"score_gpt":0.19995835369775883,"score_spread":0.16591293550874847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905410130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078019954,0.017370416,0.025716411,0.15751767,0.0028552178,0.00004471884,0.00008401792,0.00007832669,0.7183133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97359776,0.0028797584,0.0028313533,0.010755121,0.0011360137,0.0000314305,0.000037695736,0.00006820844,0.008662599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888044,0.006034127,0.00044061986,0.001418237,0.0025150217,0.0007877231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98613304,0.009350606,0.0008053423,0.0012373432,0.0019114596,0.00056214683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014944537,0.0005256522,0.0010193397,0.0014886609,0.007542068,0.007028239,0.0019346384,0.0057822308,0.00470993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01780947,0.0004014818,0.0007345781,0.0012799626,0.0687142,0.012954474,0.0061476557,0.011436815,0.00068584655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018800214,0.0000030285285,0.000098393786,0.000031568947,0.0000058943724,0.000038737227,0.0017831177,0.000039462015,0.00004852647,0.99567884,0.0007681845,0.0014853987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020854593,0.000029279754,0.0003667504,0.00012082663,0.000012632146,0.00013089353,0.0022371823,0.00015503235,0.00016361364,0.96363384,0.033114605,0.000014555714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025823372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030511285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014944537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047322954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002083501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07903522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1937855216","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2015.1079002","title":"Who's afraid of the big bad wolf? The interweaving of values and science","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Research Council Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Scientific evidence; Process (computing); Raw data; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.0714562079156887,"score_gpt":0.22427422782599132,"score_spread":0.15281801991030264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1937855216","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01167293,0.020932999,0.0073971893,0.89391357,0.0023002038,0.0000143095585,0.00005425945,0.00005040501,0.06366428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83360386,0.028624337,0.0069004977,0.112755544,0.003169312,0.000058494436,0.000061952655,0.00013889719,0.014687104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986891,0.008719557,0.00026697532,0.00078249647,0.0023875583,0.0009524589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9739982,0.016609523,0.0015067409,0.0018981203,0.0031932616,0.0027941568],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024099994,0.00041819387,0.0010953868,0.0020121634,0.008518895,0.015721371,0.001174274,0.0057247668,0.0039595836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04345131,0.00033946987,0.00039345084,0.0020732493,0.06799518,0.01959674,0.004950226,0.009627167,0.0012316052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007878482,0.000041142,0.0034073817,0.00018823818,0.000059720765,0.00031644374,0.021014614,0.00019574478,0.00020253973,0.8272563,0.08150644,0.06573267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001176604,0.000025295656,0.0010657713,0.0004246876,0.000013791308,0.0002247538,0.014126744,0.0001631953,0.00014957173,0.8682776,0.1154868,0.000030052859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009949477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013078371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9914811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069651115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008978625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12745446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1946559500","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2015.1079001","title":"Evidence: wanted, alive or dead","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Jackman Humanities Institute, University of Toronto","keywords":"Presupposition; Epistemology; Relation (database); Underdetermination; Politics; Scientific theory; Philosophy of science; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2741833162220523,"score_gpt":0.36893186041977394,"score_spread":0.09474854419772166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1946559500","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010511551,0.0781149,0.032811582,0.7242468,0.007808009,0.00012783293,0.00049431715,0.000054466724,0.14583051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77083224,0.06290766,0.025053948,0.11107781,0.00423537,0.00019040507,0.000276977,0.0001562008,0.025269393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9315776,0.03342851,0.0034602054,0.004017532,0.024101015,0.0034151736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8708597,0.08876315,0.00538605,0.005467211,0.025604043,0.0039200005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06853281,0.00066387857,0.0018491185,0.0048747677,0.010707841,0.025231197,0.004172102,0.009274307,0.0033239347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1297641,0.000810475,0.00071761524,0.0065185856,0.10499459,0.019320758,0.007124005,0.012667692,0.00079222495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029090654,0.0000056277786,0.0007436033,0.00060511567,0.00003235155,0.00015603653,0.010530298,0.000071941926,0.00013472102,0.96303755,0.01084771,0.013805903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027325565,0.000027391654,0.0012773569,0.00433635,0.00009691571,0.00035208714,0.025467768,0.00019617357,0.0005393243,0.5582119,0.40937433,0.0000930176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32585993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42794052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32585993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045928564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.081420094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64792645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950021091","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2012.981031","title":"Hume’s atheism and the role of Cleanthes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Atheism; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Reading (process); Natural (archaeology); History; Linguistics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.017094857667154736,"score_gpt":0.24924078709448458,"score_spread":0.23214592942732984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950021091","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023651268,0.007940316,0.01159779,0.29308072,0.0015383473,0.00001683489,0.00007639237,0.000073775314,0.6620245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9099911,0.0013589318,0.0023531942,0.026137995,0.0009290803,0.000031816235,0.000018382645,0.000111134636,0.059068304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948144,0.003969711,0.00006386794,0.00034328437,0.00044507498,0.00036363534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961576,0.002558566,0.00020252616,0.00045248691,0.0003855084,0.00024338815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062162024,0.00033344753,0.0004291211,0.00095343543,0.006990791,0.0058138026,0.0009967501,0.005639049,0.00665814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075939656,0.0002747191,0.00034877294,0.00064641517,0.04299517,0.008834753,0.0042535793,0.006023328,0.0012182408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068538116,0.0000029615214,0.000035084806,0.000009074839,0.0000016150833,0.000026556718,0.00731768,0.000022060178,0.000025728783,0.9849731,0.006597457,0.0009819191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011630884,0.000006598623,0.00017381848,0.00010342951,0.0000034982243,0.00009627351,0.006399287,0.00016502773,0.00025118864,0.6820347,0.31074125,0.000013351772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005576767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009723557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006990791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038243257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020468652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032874763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1954895053","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2015.1079004","title":"Social values influence the adequacy conditions of scientific theories: beyond inductive risk","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Objectivity (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Underdetermination; Philosophy of science; Relevance (law); Empirical evidence; Positive economics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05882964602861137,"score_gpt":0.3322949212887322,"score_spread":0.2734652752601209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1954895053","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16113116,0.009439931,0.35837665,0.2713347,0.0011747339,0.00073577807,0.0004390258,0.00022143446,0.19714673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9448618,0.00092579005,0.048542842,0.003523245,0.0005711351,0.00044085272,0.000067462366,0.00007404057,0.0009927828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7677269,0.16776958,0.013154877,0.013596755,0.031466637,0.006285275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.21789287,0.69336,0.02848477,0.031459678,0.024947029,0.003855643],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.23745073,0.0010617307,0.0035701154,0.008433225,0.007954271,0.015147913,0.005533514,0.011483348,0.0067354697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.50843406,0.0016915464,0.002845907,0.0044312254,0.103811756,0.032412473,0.019471923,0.0124859065,0.0007241129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074040996,0.00002741229,0.002192265,0.00019640752,0.00009086958,0.00014828316,0.004962364,0.0006928078,0.00010622312,0.9853366,0.00053565705,0.005637187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028343,0.000010956972,0.00032472968,0.0000960432,0.000017921026,0.000030367928,0.00052530284,0.00075442245,0.00017935823,0.9964767,0.0015422062,0.000013636406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00368807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003189148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9920457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011928165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013554369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.940359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1959395712","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2015.1079003","title":"Whose social values? Evaluating Canada's ‘death of evidence’ controversy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Relativism; Negotiation; Social epistemology; Context (archaeology); Politics; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.40395329886223685,"score_gpt":0.41299525769315093,"score_spread":0.009041958830914076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1959395712","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03888494,0.010895212,0.0011813228,0.8450755,0.0015347665,0.00007353816,0.0002277043,0.000031895623,0.10209502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80848706,0.0053557362,0.002355478,0.17153281,0.0011071635,0.00008989508,0.00012293037,0.00009377673,0.010855041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9498425,0.014828824,0.001593386,0.0028266562,0.021038337,0.0098703485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8238211,0.09703233,0.0045414697,0.0026723424,0.05984718,0.012085456],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05639877,0.0006004285,0.0014890863,0.00518253,0.038584873,0.039544772,0.00670193,0.021394424,0.0044915094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14120571,0.00065680995,0.00096892164,0.007227072,0.04405546,0.011863016,0.010855655,0.01878719,0.00031642185],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102319966,0.000032742057,0.0037572805,0.00030839047,0.000077258956,0.0006042831,0.025315236,0.00055344304,0.00017764179,0.8669122,0.08558414,0.016575044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022867789,0.000064964726,0.008881471,0.0023746458,0.00035076417,0.00017951042,0.08847155,0.0019546337,0.0008759029,0.40847328,0.48777226,0.00037223136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95739293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9694501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9614151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27269846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33847967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8435667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1962810377","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2010.10716726","title":"Integrity and Moral Danger","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05005797442260495,"score_gpt":0.24240552685071237,"score_spread":0.19234755242810742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1962810377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013955242,0.019344056,0.021353979,0.20622021,0.0017458207,0.000050431627,0.0000700304,0.00009782293,0.73716235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8681014,0.0065908623,0.0059676818,0.029426966,0.0016795113,0.000093626135,0.000058697457,0.00015488555,0.087926365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99088037,0.0048128082,0.00030226292,0.00092022703,0.0020193232,0.0010649959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922346,0.003414228,0.0007498651,0.0011050722,0.0014568053,0.0010394944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0094792945,0.00061340985,0.00064368715,0.0013056826,0.0098817125,0.013267244,0.0013611744,0.008358628,0.011816901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01487848,0.00036777763,0.0005324117,0.0007284602,0.06845222,0.015941624,0.0096441945,0.010290875,0.0023677892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004203118,0.0000043630757,0.00007618049,0.000014996951,0.0000019649126,0.000025862539,0.0023650117,0.00003666495,0.00002640381,0.9893385,0.005296855,0.0028090181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006259905,0.000007923282,0.0001151929,0.00009066004,0.0000027263884,0.00009887102,0.0015670867,0.000102290775,0.000063161206,0.9062358,0.0916996,0.000010498806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048210956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037441736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013267244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007358424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055799996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05338931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968262798","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2007.0000","title":"Zombies, Epiphenomenalism, and Physicalist Theories of Consciousness","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Zombie; Physicalism; Consciousness; Materialism; Monster; Philosophy; Genius; Creatures; Epistemology; Eliminative materialism; Philosophy of mind; Art history; Psychoanalysis; Literature; Art; Metaphysics; History; Psychology; Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.030447840434565845,"score_gpt":0.2588770683027151,"score_spread":0.2284292278681493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968262798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06804815,0.090521105,0.1879918,0.15448774,0.0017698442,0.00009291919,0.0001592281,0.00021509381,0.49671414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9420659,0.016119335,0.01642319,0.005908391,0.0009674714,0.00016126646,0.000042144806,0.000074071475,0.018238207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987657,0.00055803196,0.000042278134,0.00023481435,0.00027163557,0.0001276313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983413,0.0011060139,0.0001682656,0.00017981816,0.00012332384,0.00008124804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029393993,0.0004993746,0.00059541245,0.0017640473,0.0026889022,0.004223941,0.0013072535,0.0027701883,0.0045379144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040816003,0.00026682846,0.0006233877,0.0012894296,0.042902675,0.012209576,0.004004154,0.0054273037,0.00041343828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025645695,0.0000011720311,0.000018072547,0.000011733715,0.0000013300626,0.000010401287,0.00040914366,0.000059194626,0.000013707459,0.99866235,0.000199727,0.00061058055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003151954,0.0000027923807,0.0000479555,0.000014702727,0.0000013220282,0.000019504752,0.00020469882,0.00013916552,0.000020654868,0.99177915,0.007764477,0.0000022756126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031553798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020416705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045379144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004353595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016748114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03158772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969463755","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.897485","title":"Reid's First Principle #7","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Epistemology; Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.023233660878637336,"score_gpt":0.27233084964279186,"score_spread":0.24909718876415451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969463755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006824987,0.0029997188,0.09174317,0.042922612,0.002192292,0.00010157928,0.00072346395,0.00047026933,0.8520219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7179661,0.0035813206,0.07683185,0.037640017,0.0038038467,0.00083027966,0.00051846204,0.0005834854,0.15824465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940441,0.0014539905,0.00031963942,0.0016588885,0.0019283273,0.00059503445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99513286,0.0020807914,0.00022455215,0.0011735754,0.0011922384,0.00019595968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004713246,0.00079532515,0.00092174223,0.0015546498,0.0034960816,0.004292382,0.0028981445,0.0065845707,0.01446976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010806056,0.00083021587,0.0023427566,0.0007551037,0.018408258,0.008533113,0.0048968317,0.008173378,0.007010776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012526157,0.000004073324,0.0000717817,0.000051671213,0.000007203601,0.000027421498,0.00030246854,0.00011826824,0.00007229,0.9855275,0.009128879,0.0046758936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014255324,0.000022130176,0.00029148898,0.00007353764,0.000014712409,0.00026153712,0.00012343033,0.00030035476,0.0003957047,0.85153013,0.14694217,0.00003060723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045456737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029676687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01446976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038191823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032724473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048406184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970306474","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2011.0028","title":"Description, Disagreement, and Fictional Names","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Authorship Attribution and Profiling","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Fictional universe; Philosophy; Proper noun; Epistemology; Emptiness; Linguistics; Narrative","score_opus":0.08777744241595391,"score_gpt":0.22824566053096923,"score_spread":0.1404682181150153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970306474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16614926,0.007612613,0.24002962,0.04706286,0.0006731388,0.00013964217,0.0005113138,0.00033777606,0.53748375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826484,0.00058779237,0.007512926,0.0008932973,0.00013863112,0.000055927914,0.00017012676,0.000050533406,0.007942374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.985657,0.0078019216,0.0007410701,0.0017382569,0.0030677565,0.0009940114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97674495,0.014383285,0.002335244,0.0031303472,0.0026379328,0.0007682601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010908727,0.0004138109,0.00065184414,0.0037682161,0.0074515496,0.008155659,0.0021175698,0.0039169625,0.006253047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03292422,0.00044065437,0.00043726753,0.0048094103,0.030886583,0.026345817,0.007716376,0.0036354011,0.0005664536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008877507,0.0000030665246,0.00032454662,0.000018129122,0.0000018699117,0.000025824487,0.0046451977,0.00010844824,0.000026166328,0.9904054,0.00067357405,0.0037587886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000088837405,0.000005353258,0.00029029624,0.000058436253,0.000005899523,0.00009191473,0.004727292,0.00091794145,0.00021184454,0.96386015,0.029807076,0.00001488042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028626798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016565645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010908727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008160269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026556498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05920714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985419471","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2012.0014","title":"Why the Basic Structure?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Constitution; Scope (computer science); Duty; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Sociology; Politics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05762212956430192,"score_gpt":0.298501507878754,"score_spread":0.2408793783144521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985419471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020162571,0.014281136,0.041686848,0.3090685,0.003994429,0.0000748446,0.00031899818,0.0002450246,0.6101676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80972165,0.008302305,0.015023528,0.05641661,0.002384701,0.00024095699,0.00048111312,0.0004575773,0.10697153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962453,0.0014588038,0.000089773166,0.0005803998,0.0010136341,0.00061207346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974139,0.0007821968,0.00019050876,0.00044940604,0.0007057081,0.0004583714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042229486,0.0004483592,0.00044697957,0.0010499706,0.005394818,0.0058053136,0.001572543,0.0031540242,0.015052841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0080935275,0.00041594735,0.0004234203,0.00096341653,0.027106412,0.01722384,0.004993807,0.0071446593,0.0033561732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008551001,0.0000054681855,0.00012677426,0.00001814397,0.000001978586,0.000015456304,0.0012388969,0.000026551039,0.00005167518,0.98202664,0.012291649,0.004188177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017789764,0.000015538986,0.00035592966,0.00009203346,0.0000033941287,0.00007495286,0.0015872691,0.00012043846,0.00011418956,0.7811085,0.21650103,0.000008858172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010148009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012801132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015052841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072866483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00492163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052868605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997847719","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0030","title":"Modality, Individuation, and the Ontology of Art","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Aesthetic Perception and Analysis","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Object (grammar); Product (mathematics); Individuation; Modality (human–computer interaction); Contrast (vision); Sound (geography); Musical; Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Visual arts; Art; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Psychoanalysis; Acoustics","score_opus":0.05976143593382885,"score_gpt":0.24799015714363537,"score_spread":0.18822872120980652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997847719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06368985,0.012751923,0.072762996,0.006698217,0.0005522428,0.000041116353,0.00013282943,0.00014011064,0.84323066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626803,0.0025610786,0.012067324,0.00079183566,0.00034974513,0.000085229534,0.000079119585,0.00009136202,0.021294007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981824,0.0008543782,0.00007176936,0.00036956792,0.00029932716,0.0002225839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926835,0.00033176958,0.000078764846,0.00016924283,0.00007672132,0.00007524034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019199639,0.0004819588,0.00044825065,0.0018859395,0.0038641782,0.0075832605,0.0009671108,0.0018153145,0.004359113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017007516,0.0003158007,0.00075413287,0.0011568057,0.032053612,0.009474765,0.0041823653,0.002214485,0.0005826256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007228364,0.000002641776,0.000102208396,0.000013062789,0.0000022857564,0.000028661132,0.002634851,0.00006263893,0.00012983705,0.9945029,0.00025645248,0.0022572426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000105186,0.00001172211,0.00040986025,0.00004730656,0.0000056959166,0.00014765386,0.0018705113,0.00029047125,0.00018286155,0.9593354,0.037676323,0.0000115846815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003136031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028408288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075832605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002988005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011678359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02167964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000106372","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.913825","title":"Skookumchuck, Kiidk’yaas, Gibbard: normativity, meaning, and idealization (critical notice of Allan Gibbard <i>Meaning and Normativity</i>)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Idealization; Notice; Sociology; Focus (optics); Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01755610275980648,"score_gpt":0.2671049473603443,"score_spread":0.2495488446005378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000106372","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014389986,0.36408144,0.009684293,0.44943365,0.00474206,0.0000347696,0.00011725087,0.00006137618,0.15745515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6613094,0.16058278,0.0059965514,0.079676606,0.007859161,0.000278013,0.00016984565,0.00027986954,0.08384776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989918,0.0005881431,0.000025053678,0.00011843943,0.00018297553,0.000093721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876535,0.0008386074,0.000101847174,0.000044645396,0.00017688744,0.000072731804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016158073,0.00046481768,0.00043492825,0.0011818925,0.003728598,0.005628957,0.00081234105,0.0031504312,0.004962363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034704302,0.00031681545,0.00033514109,0.002250893,0.016685205,0.009919396,0.0019674627,0.003770882,0.00095331913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021386446,0.000010511784,0.00014854227,0.00010008652,0.00000522471,0.00009044202,0.0072654127,0.000084279134,0.000081606246,0.91765606,0.06749272,0.0070437267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011242825,0.000010235762,0.0006819655,0.00040317496,0.0000056572762,0.00011000682,0.006526061,0.00017562318,0.00018219215,0.80473673,0.18714008,0.00001689927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0146248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020851815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0146248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042274427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002532312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030672371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002816358","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.897475","title":"The extension of color sensations: Reid, Stewart, and Fearn","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Appeal; Aesthetics; Dilemma; Perception; Extension (predicate logic); Philosophy; Doctrine; Epistemology; Psychology; Theology; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.032267235084320556,"score_gpt":0.1964125667909303,"score_spread":0.16414533170660975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002816358","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06550829,0.1415469,0.007147676,0.48469985,0.008107066,0.000041864183,0.00009420357,0.000051728603,0.29280242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8561841,0.043858454,0.0032674274,0.05273621,0.004207952,0.000098925826,0.000039577746,0.00007910429,0.03952814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800223,0.0010885815,0.000036298858,0.0002751491,0.00043716206,0.00016055521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705136,0.0018080653,0.00023258201,0.00018594055,0.00050160155,0.0002204204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047893883,0.00071888324,0.0003838639,0.0014352717,0.0048413207,0.0051240814,0.0013702026,0.0059057837,0.0023776586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068798834,0.0004187797,0.00048860547,0.0010936945,0.046951786,0.017610148,0.0052837366,0.00728238,0.00042769933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057036083,0.00001742303,0.00036434364,0.000067154186,0.0000069505772,0.0003604963,0.06399299,0.00007286765,0.0001936387,0.88718814,0.034547225,0.0131316045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034918365,0.000056423116,0.0014543694,0.00057445804,0.00001270228,0.0012833988,0.039795566,0.000166752,0.00029245226,0.3852825,0.5709743,0.0000722301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015662413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0127828745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015662413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054446124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039503634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008347657","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.897484","title":"Reid on the priority of natural language","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Natural language; sort; Natural (archaeology); Linguistics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; History; Chemistry","score_opus":0.023103085277288254,"score_gpt":0.21912440628610946,"score_spread":0.19602132100882122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008347657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036273707,0.019168232,0.056198265,0.13269684,0.0022236612,0.00004625187,0.0002875342,0.00019308718,0.75291246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92755735,0.005335588,0.009608465,0.011823648,0.0021188476,0.0000678515,0.00009583143,0.00019066336,0.043201834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945093,0.0025306526,0.00020904404,0.0010627523,0.001175897,0.0005124406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99342346,0.0046049007,0.00025789638,0.0005223744,0.00094701577,0.00024430858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004896466,0.00035979305,0.00063284306,0.0019490459,0.0045501185,0.0057485183,0.0010699425,0.0025773947,0.005774717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009668394,0.000403026,0.0006065097,0.0015818789,0.019250942,0.010018971,0.0035392044,0.0046630353,0.0008803973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055108385,0.000001185882,0.000040040984,0.000010068293,0.000001315923,0.000012992958,0.0005935713,0.000039001465,0.00002586547,0.9960439,0.0020777863,0.0011487249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009327026,0.000009041865,0.00015971689,0.000034614008,0.000006466511,0.00005085403,0.00044409215,0.00016344007,0.00018474729,0.9159883,0.08293629,0.000013047485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006340045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004493755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006340045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004941114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00247508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035850525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016435477","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.923240","title":"Justification is potential knowledge","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; University of Aberdeen","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.06459974620442645,"score_gpt":0.25092442753209715,"score_spread":0.18632468132767072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016435477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016179794,0.0072916704,0.23503163,0.080872275,0.0013255919,0.00010261787,0.0002099116,0.00019776754,0.6587888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416375,0.002705268,0.025703035,0.00580528,0.0011223118,0.00020390794,0.00013433029,0.0001251647,0.022563247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914704,0.0044179163,0.00031747867,0.0012532283,0.0018243904,0.00071651646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876166,0.007984473,0.0006644174,0.0015578077,0.0017558865,0.00042083336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009245339,0.00048895465,0.0009270258,0.00243747,0.0046082684,0.009166037,0.001437988,0.0061804065,0.008465248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015289776,0.0004219102,0.0010255055,0.0014728935,0.04257462,0.015924135,0.0047202306,0.0054270723,0.0016076182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015380929,0.0000014067542,0.000015837551,0.000012772262,0.0000013989585,0.000008927001,0.00016924574,0.000050327984,0.00001024946,0.9984549,0.0004443003,0.0008289959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034498528,0.0000023364742,0.000024698655,0.0000403235,0.0000017699786,0.000024620882,0.00011119871,0.0001955503,0.000037589438,0.986839,0.012715798,0.0000036417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029268055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018565624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009245339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005875498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050055445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048894584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021214418","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2010.0005","title":"Recovering What Is Said With Empty Names","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Systems, Applications & Products in Data Processing (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Referent; Philosophy; Meaning (existential); Superman; Sentence; Epistemology; Linguistics; Value (mathematics); Existentialism; Original meaning; Proper noun; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.01631989699004337,"score_gpt":0.25683419391144446,"score_spread":0.24051429692140108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021214418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72680175,0.0014134111,0.16171196,0.011847146,0.00071002246,0.000091017224,0.0015322618,0.0012518929,0.09464056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97930807,0.00030826236,0.014185459,0.00093264633,0.00013444608,0.0000357253,0.0008397212,0.00021725298,0.004038513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965611,0.0014862975,0.00023872853,0.0007229791,0.0007164913,0.00027439464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878301,0.0062261205,0.0010687166,0.0028392528,0.0017025389,0.0003333152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004180858,0.0006409361,0.000775571,0.000757193,0.0017481229,0.0034358208,0.0010981446,0.002045618,0.0074969227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023573305,0.00038937348,0.0007836307,0.0010291635,0.0047137607,0.01678051,0.003851262,0.0026024587,0.0012147306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020571991,0.0002544712,0.030469105,0.0012357794,0.00019060743,0.0039310553,0.04018802,0.0030396516,0.024801044,0.75006735,0.018000633,0.1257651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005383043,0.000119829834,0.009628195,0.00020792616,0.00016539561,0.0013982313,0.016415844,0.015407198,0.014864769,0.8895154,0.052084684,0.00013868079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002624612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015983331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074969227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012729731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011903493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025079727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021515381","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.996118","title":"On Okin’s critique of libertarianism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Libertarianism; Argument (complex analysis); Dilemma; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Medicine","score_opus":0.0586692116165563,"score_gpt":0.3054623686890096,"score_spread":0.2467931570724533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021515381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022074038,0.019655306,0.0112337405,0.35694042,0.0013462714,0.000039410577,0.00006901664,0.000039734194,0.58860207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83326113,0.006498058,0.004723796,0.06757391,0.0014704269,0.00015444215,0.000032406628,0.0001203306,0.08616544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965006,0.0018777595,0.0000737678,0.00042346682,0.0006854947,0.0004388794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805045,0.0013934303,0.0001265732,0.00010135275,0.00021673719,0.0001113705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004109207,0.0003598481,0.00052392646,0.0009802683,0.008400854,0.004663803,0.0009630275,0.005084073,0.0041843737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004875755,0.00024805052,0.00039972016,0.0008729146,0.029643483,0.005991426,0.0033276347,0.0066001746,0.00058976165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005835502,0.000003913111,0.000028667606,0.000008577821,6.856464e-7,0.000023227492,0.001620228,0.00003873984,0.000018092178,0.99278754,0.0044862353,0.000978302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012172811,0.000008834777,0.00014604956,0.00009423465,0.0000031856955,0.000046950176,0.0016296619,0.00019044658,0.00009553669,0.8590989,0.1386619,0.000012063737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0128149865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0114264805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0128149865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009042531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003943869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06560844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025188704","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2011.0030","title":"Richard Gaskin, The Unity of the Proposition. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press2008. Pp. xv + 455.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0852654655467508,"score_gpt":0.19857695577186912,"score_spread":0.11331149022511833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025188704","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045874392,0.9289849,0.0021375841,0.023087889,0.0016256376,0.000012660949,0.0003163154,0.00009154076,0.043284755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033004805,0.8614846,0.0069761807,0.008772563,0.004356979,0.00011823775,0.0005652083,0.0003396262,0.08438186],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990398,0.00036138832,0.0000895342,0.00013560517,0.00028614874,0.00008744113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794453,0.0013387003,0.000166024,0.00010879399,0.00033852892,0.00010336937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016278806,0.0017255825,0.0011290938,0.0046513556,0.0023293155,0.0042069275,0.0016917145,0.0032109316,0.032648608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037054992,0.0012355684,0.0009495857,0.0044820295,0.007030742,0.012295927,0.0014749152,0.004535744,0.012764264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007791469,0.000025617735,0.0003385985,0.0009889978,0.000037131744,0.00023761038,0.002548869,0.00032268572,0.0001467368,0.20678803,0.71285444,0.07563332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020932614,0.0000091401425,0.0014540642,0.0013959635,0.000025338779,0.0003486747,0.0011462729,0.000112864574,0.00017435354,0.18775554,0.807529,0.000027914584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024998052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04293556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032648608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042805555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003453804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109220445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026241495","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.944814","title":"Lexical norms, language comprehension, and the epistemology of testimony","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Victoria","keywords":"Comprehension; Underwriting; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.035859880952245314,"score_gpt":0.23333721370638028,"score_spread":0.19747733275413495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026241495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23377348,0.013351204,0.25939763,0.10125925,0.0006984159,0.00016231666,0.00024394355,0.00027071036,0.39084312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98621297,0.00089787086,0.010180957,0.00076619006,0.00017198773,0.00007154093,0.00003732529,0.000042962012,0.0016182428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9674508,0.024882197,0.0012891581,0.0016951975,0.0038401692,0.00084258907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90685976,0.07354194,0.006132223,0.0059019825,0.0063273394,0.001236744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028724108,0.0004726122,0.000838567,0.00437718,0.0048797666,0.011550564,0.0018989932,0.0043233517,0.0025786418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08776504,0.0005076143,0.0005418096,0.0018745885,0.06170471,0.017462796,0.0064409124,0.0046428195,0.00036306898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024416518,0.000022387743,0.0005460504,0.000085237305,0.000010335292,0.000075459415,0.017321825,0.00032955073,0.00022146395,0.9727374,0.0005121313,0.008113801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010589069,0.000009116603,0.00036266906,0.00008694383,0.000004993595,0.000047017555,0.0032379893,0.000559113,0.00027305298,0.9918624,0.0035323987,0.00001376684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004726989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023816673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028724108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005359736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004324869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15190941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029616281","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2010.0007","title":"The Explanatory Structure of the Transcendental Deduction and a Cognitive Interpretation of the First Critique","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Psychologism; Transcendental number; Sensibility; Articulation (sociology); Transcendental philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.010484339825473197,"score_gpt":0.21264243316530515,"score_spread":0.20215809333983195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029616281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027473716,0.008118429,0.17706951,0.2512487,0.0033747538,0.000093868766,0.00030625513,0.00029054584,0.53202426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90520316,0.0018712952,0.035092257,0.017849712,0.0030115522,0.00030777295,0.00014084666,0.00018551927,0.036337923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99424756,0.0028445746,0.00014841987,0.0006640327,0.001439974,0.0006554909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882847,0.007566587,0.00079942675,0.0012849324,0.0016458862,0.0004185081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061748596,0.0007751328,0.00083631696,0.004033428,0.003909522,0.008847351,0.0029663001,0.0071006934,0.009064426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016596127,0.0003207322,0.0015553464,0.0019392208,0.035514105,0.0096285585,0.0046339673,0.007218938,0.0010471945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004216692,0.0000039745582,0.000023735289,0.00001057907,0.0000015347784,0.000022231228,0.00064867054,0.00007510514,0.000016253054,0.9971161,0.0013682764,0.00070946536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001232094,0.000006154055,0.000065519096,0.000036161906,0.000002772636,0.000038217717,0.00041734322,0.00047282822,0.000076955155,0.9807803,0.018083908,0.0000074557865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049606957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041627977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009064426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062058778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035100235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045026958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044703139","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0061","title":"Promises to the Self","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Epistemology; Reflexivity; Negativity effect; Philosophy; General interest; Contemporary philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.06033349264577125,"score_gpt":0.24681202057070065,"score_spread":0.1864785279249294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044703139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010015232,0.008279656,0.019848261,0.15471886,0.0017706812,0.00003101024,0.00010203486,0.0001629715,0.8050713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8388207,0.008377792,0.007392999,0.021683767,0.0022090084,0.0001354279,0.000109440065,0.00024293983,0.12102792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993533,0.003930089,0.000108645974,0.0005966455,0.0013153689,0.0005162106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99300236,0.0030925258,0.00052896736,0.0012708172,0.0013515374,0.0007538173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00791893,0.00040947553,0.00044599324,0.000823516,0.0077600367,0.00922163,0.0009704913,0.004120731,0.009370375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01600464,0.00033436783,0.0005579306,0.0008101441,0.02894861,0.014497978,0.005454557,0.007022225,0.003015494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064904148,0.0000033586293,0.000052372172,0.000020237441,0.0000025182599,0.000027029524,0.0026731542,0.00004229026,0.00004901229,0.9840024,0.010660432,0.0024606965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005854602,0.000013302216,0.00012761331,0.00017210908,0.0000072421794,0.000093345196,0.0036825489,0.00018407959,0.00020215742,0.6909072,0.30458996,0.000014615925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038708798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003279298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009370375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005237825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005764719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041879773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045315299","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.981932","title":"Representationalism, perceptual distortion and the limits of phenomenal concepts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Falsity; Direct and indirect realism; Epistemology; Perception; Distortion (music); Counterexample; Philosophy; Content (measure theory); Psychology; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07938908558787802,"score_gpt":0.33832631235703764,"score_spread":0.25893722676915965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045315299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3631775,0.011192234,0.25823265,0.043356217,0.0005539559,0.00011509571,0.00024215522,0.0005226412,0.3226076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99048513,0.00046202456,0.0072509944,0.00042716108,0.0000737799,0.000050272556,0.00002950854,0.000046888992,0.0011741504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923379,0.003149573,0.0005081033,0.0012851814,0.002058885,0.00066034665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816196,0.008158744,0.002233001,0.005739463,0.0014754436,0.0007736233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010085953,0.00044964987,0.00087651185,0.0021238332,0.0031772642,0.007261255,0.0019863888,0.0022100126,0.0025870982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020883288,0.00054490985,0.0009846597,0.0011882014,0.05692661,0.022620158,0.009494902,0.0058048433,0.00024116816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016567485,0.0000053749063,0.00019431251,0.00003053432,0.0000056590593,0.00004448912,0.0030740455,0.00023353666,0.00023171394,0.99376124,0.0001704655,0.0022319613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009039707,0.0000082955385,0.00032918513,0.00001974011,0.0000040501354,0.00011625875,0.0006670085,0.0005122469,0.0002507212,0.99439126,0.0036833216,0.000008840059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020560336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006825335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010085953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005459308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016072026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053340256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045543924","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0042","title":"Causal Essentialism versus the Zombie Worlds","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Zombie; Physicalism; Epistemology; Consciousness; Philosophy; Supervenience; Qualia; Falsity; Philosophy of mind; Metaphysics; Essentialism; Computer science","score_opus":0.03382292534503098,"score_gpt":0.2989595447810922,"score_spread":0.26513661943606126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045543924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10642563,0.011581496,0.2314313,0.088001736,0.000717698,0.00009439038,0.00039350524,0.00022166262,0.5611326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98469377,0.0015174478,0.0068856203,0.0012152103,0.00021335894,0.000055659864,0.00006193055,0.00003354231,0.00532351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869126,0.0005673591,0.000059831214,0.00027282044,0.00025420712,0.00015450559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962519,0.002516219,0.00030654945,0.00042846473,0.00030997727,0.00018697935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002189643,0.00032892337,0.0004671105,0.0015148398,0.0016218825,0.0025588912,0.00081162615,0.0017046373,0.0059652864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052972096,0.00035873576,0.00053769106,0.0008608375,0.01827343,0.009932544,0.0027925768,0.0031418933,0.00038279226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003800407,0.0000013747317,0.00003152447,0.000009504167,0.0000013784943,0.000012448666,0.00011685995,0.000054592496,0.000023587847,0.99907696,0.00016629593,0.00050154276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007260232,0.0000020644336,0.00007261684,0.000011457504,0.0000028258878,0.000020100533,0.00010542718,0.00022773856,0.000038790116,0.99577254,0.0037368718,0.0000023270095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030936657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026136031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059652864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002616963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015558049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019955873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046309195","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0009","title":"The Social Dimensions of Modesty","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Character (mathematics); Natural (archaeology); Character traits; Psychology; Social psychology; Simple (philosophy); Trait; Philosophy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.07944100043389908,"score_gpt":0.24506652677599153,"score_spread":0.16562552634209243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046309195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17821448,0.0024362209,0.020091245,0.026948527,0.00020355562,0.00004649241,0.00009100567,0.00006387898,0.7719046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935819,0.00039317983,0.0010378389,0.00042653063,0.00006646056,0.000024581663,0.00001530435,0.000011585716,0.0044427356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959422,0.0023520738,0.00013543815,0.00039400224,0.00078628917,0.00038990437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965287,0.0013783079,0.0006695096,0.00042583942,0.0004205348,0.0005770625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031071824,0.00031345384,0.00024292484,0.0013680846,0.005007109,0.0045020864,0.000452464,0.001255766,0.0035865663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052178036,0.00016246462,0.0002923119,0.00085081335,0.039234713,0.00390207,0.004973335,0.0021575573,0.00035293994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011707654,0.000010970835,0.0016617811,0.000019024725,0.0000100378575,0.000085330415,0.010193695,0.00014125799,0.0001995546,0.9816772,0.001139447,0.0048499815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015754566,0.000047560836,0.007059273,0.00007472386,0.0000122590955,0.00023129252,0.009413289,0.00056909217,0.00022023809,0.89612573,0.08620854,0.000022194119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027600322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025277487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005007109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029765803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014890898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02159673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047242378","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2007.0012","title":"Pirates, Kings and Reasons to Ad: Moral Motivation and the Role of Sanctions in Locke's Moral Theory","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sanctions; Natural law; Hedonism; Pleasure; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Moral psychology; Moral disengagement; Normative ethics; Moral philosophy; Moral reasoning; Law; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.019874559541167236,"score_gpt":0.25378337560688335,"score_spread":0.23390881606571612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047242378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14902464,0.008632049,0.0286541,0.11079465,0.00058453425,0.000043410833,0.00008663057,0.00007254496,0.7021074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982748,0.0010673564,0.0017335068,0.0021342272,0.00020811736,0.000034093635,0.0000103498105,0.000019873141,0.012044553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973736,0.0016124615,0.000048919912,0.000199892,0.00037875905,0.00038642745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99497116,0.0032600127,0.00046550995,0.00028861474,0.0004439644,0.00057070155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043460345,0.00033020056,0.00042446805,0.0015416589,0.0036712163,0.0068890345,0.0009412061,0.0036485358,0.00507902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008913729,0.0002760668,0.00037736061,0.0010492447,0.021676539,0.0066005783,0.003082675,0.0039075227,0.00047696373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005891717,0.000011298292,0.00024830934,0.00000823202,0.0000017544461,0.000019922223,0.0006805082,0.00013130324,0.000013474962,0.99595,0.001183106,0.0017462143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013363489,0.000009449096,0.0007114499,0.000043734286,0.0000036574047,0.00002734763,0.0007538033,0.0006321704,0.000035702917,0.98281556,0.014943025,0.000010787389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026794078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036210816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068890345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037131167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024606052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026940644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049669090","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.905251","title":"Debunking enactivism: a critical notice of Hutto and Myin’s Radicalizing Enactivism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Embodied and Extended Cognition","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Enactivism; Epistemology; Internalism and externalism; Notice; Action (physics); Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Autopoiesis; Law","score_opus":0.03618419868820575,"score_gpt":0.2586043134393586,"score_spread":0.22242011475115284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049669090","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023449384,0.1714944,0.08892233,0.4099665,0.011205441,0.000047624515,0.00006292693,0.00023456836,0.2946169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79032785,0.05826664,0.01541469,0.06778863,0.013610744,0.00024473044,0.000065742475,0.0005916612,0.05368926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625766,0.0020025477,0.000115395975,0.00054713956,0.00079404376,0.00028319118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936585,0.004935457,0.00021967641,0.00045215868,0.00057988655,0.00015437383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065684146,0.0005183166,0.0005661608,0.0010272573,0.0027969345,0.004016219,0.0020767713,0.0043152063,0.002593746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007907179,0.00026503616,0.0003993486,0.00078197167,0.032145377,0.011806337,0.0036852134,0.0099133095,0.00062162796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000110196515,0.0000043595105,0.00004807965,0.00007077139,0.0000029720318,0.00003954683,0.0031766032,0.00011781893,0.0000835216,0.98459446,0.0056742253,0.006176645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000106552825,0.000015537476,0.00014680141,0.00023068623,0.000006299724,0.0001288464,0.0013738137,0.00039880714,0.0003711383,0.7536891,0.24360977,0.000018503297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030585916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031875458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065684146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003865974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002229919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034737527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066844139","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2006.0016","title":"Disquotationalism, Truth and Justification: The Pragmatist's Wrong Turn","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Coherence theory of truth; Nothing; Pragmatic theory of truth; Logical truth; Predicate (mathematical logic); Proposition; Truth condition; Tautology (logic); Pragmatism; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.023905739594185536,"score_gpt":0.19812844517018435,"score_spread":0.1742227055759988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066844139","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017983686,0.055073958,0.053755708,0.6458243,0.0035158962,0.000029405674,0.0001394363,0.00022838099,0.22344926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88998926,0.011916817,0.016434038,0.052524123,0.006812359,0.00015163167,0.00007979705,0.00034555848,0.021746496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938121,0.003508408,0.00023910802,0.0006942916,0.0013983994,0.00034766595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888066,0.008380762,0.00043875698,0.0012060301,0.0008799577,0.00028796404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00991213,0.0006196706,0.0012692962,0.002192106,0.0048244786,0.008371894,0.0016794284,0.008485816,0.0041413913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017498683,0.0005072433,0.0007689313,0.0015316862,0.05892541,0.023766642,0.005172879,0.014545254,0.00084062736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045516877,0.0000033991034,0.000027531125,0.00001416997,0.0000025581257,0.000017714574,0.00067202206,0.000051182422,0.000018493361,0.99426043,0.003046427,0.0018815913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060901393,0.000001826493,0.000020507701,0.000021685726,0.0000012364494,0.000017833514,0.00012349022,0.00012705749,0.000019293793,0.9898751,0.009783229,0.0000027198525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047020554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035951345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00991213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006797751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038461064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052420974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067996822","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.897481","title":"Reid's response to Hume's perceptual relativity argument","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Perception; Appeal; Epistemology; Philosophy; Nothing; Ideal (ethics); Principal (computer security); Psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02499908837347552,"score_gpt":0.28001693473761924,"score_spread":0.2550178463641437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067996822","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047310092,0.0032579831,0.006034361,0.88891226,0.0057093645,0.000020689862,0.00016417718,0.00014027987,0.09102985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32433414,0.0040475335,0.005879446,0.60032016,0.014713743,0.00019849776,0.00007867583,0.0002610443,0.05016679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99254566,0.0026873678,0.00037921604,0.0013094575,0.0025621701,0.00051619555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97728044,0.016248472,0.0007938949,0.0015407399,0.0036341718,0.0005023206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0091328705,0.000669154,0.0008863592,0.0015000855,0.004697728,0.003741823,0.0029573038,0.021270948,0.0110944975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039946605,0.000711006,0.0012781201,0.0013144541,0.017933823,0.011451333,0.0047752834,0.01775456,0.0032724147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012275256,0.000023161778,0.0003864818,0.000118993914,0.000031505453,0.00037622714,0.003436108,0.00023062954,0.00027130728,0.6952548,0.2884836,0.011264448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057536967,0.00003652967,0.0009530157,0.00021374498,0.00003076098,0.000719432,0.0016990078,0.000504711,0.0009497281,0.4560204,0.5386913,0.00012380465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063195126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003706874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021270948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060824784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018722943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04829985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069466861","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2006.0002","title":"Benefits, Intentions, and the Principle of Fairness","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Economic Justice; Moral obligation; Law and economics; Set (abstract data type); Public good; Economics; Sociology; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.038746418038848145,"score_gpt":0.28549262075136494,"score_spread":0.2467462027125168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069466861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021382961,0.0075800526,0.14134574,0.043534122,0.0012070304,0.00020103669,0.00016972327,0.0001371626,0.784442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8802543,0.0038938976,0.054728065,0.007954504,0.001525027,0.000590667,0.00013305047,0.0001668991,0.050753545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874784,0.006029262,0.00045889843,0.001579498,0.003311242,0.0011427767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939055,0.0032519451,0.0004539215,0.0010730851,0.0009370528,0.0003784505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013714913,0.0007319755,0.00087127433,0.0016922534,0.004617718,0.008302887,0.0016603683,0.006010566,0.006091849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014428527,0.0005408319,0.0010348181,0.0013137127,0.03632954,0.010384477,0.0064440253,0.005757841,0.0011771949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035871547,0.000002900155,0.00004749084,0.000008554618,0.0000019514462,0.0000071485783,0.00022445251,0.00010329508,0.000016425876,0.9974946,0.00047828752,0.0016114203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064536416,0.00000470499,0.00007851401,0.000022303542,0.000002659445,0.000017725552,0.00008111028,0.00016165215,0.000029851386,0.985649,0.013941256,0.0000047654016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004758877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029891732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013714913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004772662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047152555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07253224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069587569","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.977835","title":"Kant on conic sections","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conic section; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.03580878565759277,"score_gpt":0.20249520829678969,"score_spread":0.16668642263919692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069587569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019280812,0.0077120513,0.039032973,0.017632654,0.0010423205,0.000029338986,0.00013093873,0.000105722276,0.9150331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.853188,0.004636924,0.010526169,0.006670844,0.0010427707,0.00009082526,0.00013349418,0.00021861613,0.1234924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972184,0.0015363785,0.00007160916,0.00036761712,0.00054985844,0.0002562914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974681,0.0012193159,0.00015161952,0.00037726312,0.00066286034,0.00012075038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025721753,0.00044821433,0.00031407573,0.0013036993,0.003911082,0.004056882,0.00056026527,0.001745846,0.006989964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053556524,0.00023511273,0.0003599922,0.0011810034,0.016239129,0.0061853174,0.0023418998,0.0036835473,0.0016102247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003607667,9.92982e-7,0.000020172578,0.0000055463433,7.032519e-7,0.000008406143,0.00034110967,0.000077896,0.00001677576,0.9968317,0.0015865745,0.0011065168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004167958,0.0000047271647,0.00007083451,0.000035095232,0.0000016375718,0.000023129756,0.00028452513,0.00016179967,0.00010724925,0.9253272,0.07397528,0.00000426688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034664862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025977993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006989964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004023594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018162704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029193401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069611010","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2006.0004","title":"Revelation and Normativity in Visual Experience","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Color perception and design","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Magyarország Kormánya","keywords":"Perception; Color vision; Psychology; Point (geometry); Color discrimination; Task (project management); Visual perception; Notice; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Geometry; Computer science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.029688733845200897,"score_gpt":0.3039974524939578,"score_spread":0.27430871864875694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069611010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.622106,0.0030520163,0.0860732,0.010397425,0.00042656864,0.00005150445,0.00015678404,0.00015064132,0.27758586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965148,0.00015223521,0.0018294341,0.00016112844,0.000056347602,0.000019616138,0.000015708092,0.000008474453,0.0012423416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968593,0.001749327,0.00015917371,0.0004899072,0.000470197,0.00027210216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938812,0.0033461996,0.00075229455,0.00097441,0.00062700006,0.00041884716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039787954,0.00017917654,0.00032683156,0.00069923187,0.0009940824,0.002970243,0.0005136945,0.0011562901,0.0037470027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010073483,0.0002216255,0.00031985488,0.0003218287,0.009612203,0.004300082,0.0025298318,0.0012415065,0.00019122899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022758594,0.000036146885,0.0030388087,0.00010022881,0.000024685178,0.00022086002,0.007897227,0.0004773339,0.0049102968,0.9665571,0.00066229294,0.015847398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027398733,0.00007231379,0.004317138,0.0000234142,0.000007006651,0.00025202375,0.0016779534,0.0010125305,0.0006413953,0.9881562,0.003786543,0.000026113978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004273696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002833096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039787954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082998455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003274026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021042109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080890053","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2007.0011","title":"Public Reason and Moral Compromise","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Politics; Compromise; Epistemology; Criticism; Doctrine; Philosophy; Public reason; Law; Sociology; Political science; Democracy; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.14590508185590634,"score_gpt":0.3165623061178905,"score_spread":0.17065722426198415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080890053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015883315,0.0064033964,0.030661616,0.15023325,0.0012566873,0.00006355473,0.000055185872,0.00011117193,0.79533184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393884,0.0015997929,0.0055031735,0.011347585,0.001132917,0.00012056441,0.000041614876,0.00013973717,0.04072613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97534966,0.013968472,0.0006947781,0.003354768,0.0037399114,0.0028922816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797673,0.0122942375,0.0014456176,0.0031363596,0.0023830468,0.0009734993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024606299,0.00067304424,0.0011837003,0.002386427,0.0113581745,0.018903576,0.0023175196,0.017536443,0.011805336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036051832,0.0005110891,0.0013460418,0.0016537957,0.051938932,0.01656241,0.01106932,0.012393253,0.0017002361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028744237,0.0000038616463,0.000025006779,0.000007507903,0.0000031637423,0.000014632582,0.00039088062,0.00009305671,0.000008780952,0.99700385,0.0015977866,0.0008487597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008273811,0.0000029125772,0.000027539209,0.000029552866,0.0000029536088,0.000018308087,0.00023266378,0.00018311203,0.00003695162,0.979293,0.020159904,0.0000047791295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035635454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003135241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024606299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015409373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007950106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13013214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083102510","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2008.0005","title":"On the Value of Happiness: Herder contra Kant","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Destiny (ISS module); Tone (literature); Content (measure theory); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04026447914236973,"score_gpt":0.22899226336992035,"score_spread":0.1887277842275506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083102510","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008097215,0.26522937,0.0053048315,0.51406586,0.0061728675,0.00002522722,0.00032650513,0.00008486729,0.20069318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52444977,0.13744807,0.0049464824,0.21998435,0.02172551,0.00020063575,0.00023108059,0.00017096101,0.09084316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972868,0.0013183801,0.00007609477,0.00047921602,0.0006084196,0.0002311228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983411,0.0012321011,0.00011211927,0.00007618263,0.00018471264,0.000053825745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026666007,0.0004804172,0.00061537186,0.0013480051,0.0021355096,0.0048454534,0.00090598885,0.004531201,0.0035676043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004905359,0.00029656637,0.00032579966,0.0015586443,0.02000555,0.0071187047,0.0027561018,0.0073386673,0.0012331676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022622007,0.0000048798083,0.000096182004,0.000105818566,0.0000061207793,0.000045794037,0.0022227184,0.00011819018,0.00003640144,0.9313857,0.05827735,0.0076782913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008069351,0.000017250259,0.0003814557,0.000584648,0.000007863983,0.000111858295,0.0009968316,0.00015504533,0.00008717152,0.6819528,0.31567773,0.00001924666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004779834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002334143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048454534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040022335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015862421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02903831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089954343","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2012.0006","title":"Armstrong and van Fraassen on Probabilistic Laws of Nature","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Probabilistic logic; Philosophy; Natural law; Law; Limiting; Epistemology; Problem of universals; Political science","score_opus":0.0316674003061764,"score_gpt":0.21492212499886715,"score_spread":0.18325472469269075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089954343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012227882,0.090139076,0.06354935,0.33904907,0.0052641467,0.000069621754,0.000463305,0.0001037846,0.48913378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62067676,0.060275055,0.040466487,0.10341257,0.01359944,0.0004869522,0.000363254,0.00031395277,0.16040546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978898,0.00091445434,0.00006469915,0.00043242835,0.0005784252,0.000120228266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957426,0.0033113433,0.00016890177,0.00030288324,0.0003728814,0.00010134797],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002989834,0.0006840309,0.0005416728,0.0015351475,0.0025633713,0.003926324,0.0012689898,0.0048168814,0.0057802466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0083517535,0.00039498718,0.00073086686,0.0019574584,0.01662515,0.010342698,0.0020800598,0.0057962253,0.0011708819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051362485,0.0000037799293,0.000042237767,0.000013545046,0.000001862301,0.000016827897,0.0003680298,0.00014524294,0.00002130691,0.9888854,0.008062788,0.002433892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031995887,0.0000023514772,0.00011907993,0.000052654064,0.0000019484708,0.000019317145,0.000064497726,0.00015087823,0.000028658413,0.952954,0.04659812,0.0000052269447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007813072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005754515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99743664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004615391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017474606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0334872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091795196","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2006.0010","title":"Theory, Observation, and the Role of Scientific Understanding in the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Epistemology; Cognitivism (psychology); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Scientific theory; Order (exchange); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Cognition","score_opus":0.015588647626654895,"score_gpt":0.1952961808118147,"score_spread":0.1797075331851598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091795196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05816664,0.011410576,0.10877274,0.092391245,0.0013023765,0.000072323724,0.000056155426,0.00009958549,0.7277283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97338665,0.0021954137,0.011144318,0.0026684504,0.00047750145,0.00009502885,0.000020971767,0.00006695259,0.009944684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99017525,0.0067034806,0.00024394537,0.0007201345,0.0016750066,0.0004822252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881883,0.008735167,0.0008335584,0.001164464,0.0007073455,0.00037108103],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012142119,0.00058647746,0.0005833416,0.00208895,0.0053697326,0.010407916,0.0015821876,0.004600717,0.002745454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010536799,0.00041457886,0.0009493577,0.0015107746,0.13328919,0.013702799,0.0064212964,0.0072425967,0.0002935421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003838074,0.000004865914,0.00008332627,0.000025615227,0.0000019634847,0.00002298542,0.0050047715,0.00013226413,0.00007540763,0.99287426,0.00033138786,0.0014393632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068004338,0.0000066473763,0.00012850997,0.00004412575,0.0000030820972,0.00005702139,0.002190791,0.00028955395,0.00008392079,0.9836727,0.013509874,0.000006930587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034959705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032545263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9946303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006434943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037221666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06421447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107553779","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2006.0011","title":"Motivating the Relevant Alternatives Approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Core (optical fiber); Philosophy; General interest; Positive economics; Contemporary philosophy; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.06275002607445239,"score_gpt":0.22920596469630186,"score_spread":0.1664559386218495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107553779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021539994,0.008347503,0.115472116,0.18491839,0.0015539506,0.00019087188,0.00015460902,0.00008906673,0.66773343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8975079,0.003983345,0.048538964,0.017384792,0.0016915214,0.00034248343,0.0000900384,0.0001274429,0.030333396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871617,0.009225785,0.00024063488,0.0010173096,0.0016568075,0.0006977206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979228,0.016611777,0.00058257265,0.0010002679,0.001743241,0.0008339454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016017968,0.00074436906,0.0009199546,0.0019486137,0.0058748215,0.0075078593,0.0021044041,0.0067227697,0.011375204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023225477,0.0004458693,0.0010296499,0.0012453598,0.030667424,0.013241737,0.0059827142,0.009366215,0.0016041144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005466763,0.000007748615,0.00003566913,0.000015621465,0.0000018899259,0.00004274605,0.00041546565,0.000121962876,0.00001620725,0.99648464,0.0013612874,0.0014913024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066500365,0.0000029063663,0.000026952688,0.000031636268,0.000001810501,0.0000216209,0.00036974097,0.00042660747,0.00003063308,0.9844737,0.014603847,0.000003911917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043194676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045215865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016017968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063995775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004613444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08471215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113636945","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2010.10716728","title":"Incompatibilism and Prudential Obligation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Incompatibilism; Determinism; Free will; Compatibilism; Premise; Epistemology; Obligation; Philosophy; Skepticism; Moral responsibility; Libertarianism; Indeterminism; Control (management); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.020168831416003247,"score_gpt":0.22615790996121699,"score_spread":0.20598907854521373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113636945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09663937,0.005440883,0.07793129,0.044825856,0.00046538914,0.00007433844,0.00008401201,0.00011270325,0.77442616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801665,0.0007229661,0.006664362,0.0018020145,0.00022768411,0.00009067347,0.00002845339,0.000027596863,0.01026969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99306947,0.0031462957,0.00024821938,0.0012490347,0.0015754051,0.0007115183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961994,0.002009089,0.0004052384,0.0006576558,0.00040360578,0.0003249878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060306573,0.0004473325,0.00061028457,0.0013916119,0.0043272553,0.0042160624,0.0012929984,0.0038716542,0.005786528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008825129,0.00041538704,0.00081189256,0.0008297264,0.027154807,0.007795776,0.005920045,0.0044191773,0.0006235095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035274932,0.000004089954,0.000060132403,0.000006027223,0.0000018758635,0.000026087002,0.00034225444,0.000095218486,0.000020674299,0.9982754,0.0003179348,0.00084688794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041011726,0.0000032709063,0.00008838427,0.000011015636,0.0000015632735,0.00003327992,0.000089681744,0.00020830004,0.000036263184,0.99399865,0.0055225245,0.000002903738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021554313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014057718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060306573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044709686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025112603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03243935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120880503","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0023","title":"Truth in Virtue of Meaning","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Philosophy; Quine; Empiricism","score_opus":0.039772900000427554,"score_gpt":0.2663466838857376,"score_spread":0.22657378388531008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120880503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024787452,0.012697627,0.1738577,0.06132701,0.001975394,0.000088159206,0.0002621741,0.00016394522,0.72484064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95495194,0.0029981395,0.018148903,0.005718435,0.0014951911,0.00014101768,0.00018636076,0.00012420413,0.016235873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99277735,0.0039817574,0.00032443128,0.0009539995,0.0014968388,0.00046563134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99502325,0.0031155546,0.00032636066,0.0008065811,0.00053924596,0.0001891062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007567111,0.00046147214,0.0007598443,0.0019708027,0.0046845293,0.007262045,0.001288537,0.004569327,0.010328415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011931453,0.0004591468,0.0008779951,0.0014138678,0.03152255,0.015653403,0.005826367,0.005619882,0.0016184573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035143578,0.0000015346328,0.000038439837,0.00001754928,0.0000015990806,0.000008412508,0.0006574416,0.000024406972,0.000029880159,0.9971118,0.00055676856,0.0015485208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027531726,0.000008808404,0.00009114022,0.000039533264,0.000002669691,0.000040708797,0.000288423,0.00014963558,0.0000613838,0.9828592,0.016451323,0.0000045532524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016827623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001491217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010328415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037745582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020859295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040019155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135214580","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716599","title":"Contemporary Skepticism and the Cariesian God","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Genius; Psychology","score_opus":0.06418901640702497,"score_gpt":0.2300197583400521,"score_spread":0.1658307419330271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135214580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065622695,0.032224204,0.0055874693,0.19266462,0.00089630904,0.000011595151,0.00005152764,0.00006732005,0.7028743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746534,0.0049303183,0.00078096497,0.0071359198,0.0007147611,0.0000138833175,0.000017670407,0.000039282553,0.011713744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99533325,0.0023587341,0.00012382584,0.0005651417,0.0011575255,0.00046135398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993523,0.0041294307,0.0005741644,0.00057382503,0.0008915803,0.00030792036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005480415,0.00031552624,0.00045633418,0.0018759292,0.008375541,0.008402388,0.00078767905,0.005705066,0.00326599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009467572,0.00034402884,0.0003525784,0.0014160973,0.04738484,0.0077785267,0.0040876037,0.0075952373,0.00059802266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009700639,0.0000050378544,0.00013884682,0.000019473524,0.000002457646,0.00007855873,0.008047404,0.000038295777,0.000028865243,0.98521495,0.004041833,0.002374611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013363994,0.000012917484,0.00043300315,0.00017729854,0.000005149754,0.0002706263,0.005352469,0.00017549987,0.0001419556,0.83577734,0.15762725,0.000013036403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048949146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00409335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008402388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007644474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030835043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055464804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149704867","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2007.0025","title":"Teleology Without Tears: Aristotle and the Role of Mechanistic Conceptions of Organisms","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Teleology; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Context (archaeology); Natural philosophy; Philosophy; Ancient Greek; Ancient philosophy; Field (mathematics); History","score_opus":0.014540672982007851,"score_gpt":0.20268905907084223,"score_spread":0.18814838608883439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149704867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043574013,0.034819614,0.04784928,0.10942671,0.0023210226,0.000030896525,0.000089073044,0.000110232475,0.7617791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94487876,0.0067128213,0.0065803286,0.007901889,0.0013080062,0.00005119013,0.000031417996,0.0000853656,0.032450344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983114,0.0009424274,0.00005237962,0.00021987608,0.00032558021,0.00014834107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980831,0.0012655242,0.000129008,0.0002253672,0.00019445809,0.000102626356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031997857,0.0003625899,0.00040540932,0.0012114173,0.004454235,0.0038517998,0.0008716509,0.0029425258,0.0046227993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003967155,0.00028145735,0.00037447756,0.0007474889,0.037718814,0.014455378,0.0028655163,0.0045260806,0.00059378566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043724226,0.0000016133791,0.000024362356,0.000008839017,0.000001015254,0.00001551087,0.0009828822,0.00004747082,0.0000135400005,0.9971008,0.0007141516,0.0010854362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007131228,0.000004695691,0.000092261675,0.000028477183,0.0000015558107,0.000033740886,0.0007088224,0.00010774362,0.00003071428,0.9727303,0.026248872,0.000005675841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003628506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033225354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046227993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043200953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018989245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031344652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154905584","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0063","title":"From Thick to Thin: Two Moral Reduction Plans","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05836533605621926,"score_gpt":0.2532884893290386,"score_spread":0.1949231532728193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154905584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0308849,0.0016051033,0.14601526,0.051827215,0.001005416,0.00034608523,0.00030681488,0.00024880155,0.76776046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7772809,0.0012516666,0.10222224,0.009900704,0.00064069487,0.0011277441,0.00033385903,0.00042081278,0.106821194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942267,0.002507756,0.00018728636,0.00064469053,0.0018799903,0.000553567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956541,0.0016628529,0.00032541482,0.0008607283,0.0009913075,0.00050558243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055559888,0.0010144337,0.0005868157,0.0019781827,0.005329786,0.0070988582,0.0018598913,0.0039311256,0.0137366215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011632632,0.000752295,0.0011604743,0.0010292748,0.0301456,0.013018621,0.009320856,0.011027505,0.0021432012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007890822,0.000011110738,0.000035457284,0.000011399905,0.0000013885398,0.000016633541,0.00046353505,0.0000756047,0.00005007231,0.9958916,0.0014622477,0.0019730276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012902299,0.000008433885,0.00008787748,0.00002588817,0.000004108411,0.0000308399,0.00055035506,0.00044652986,0.0001436593,0.9848968,0.013784547,0.000007989254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024379117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003208956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0137366215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005430836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035303882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04595363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160608726","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0045","title":"Augustine on Testimony","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Augustinian Studies and Theology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Aside; Epistemology; Section (typography); Doxastic logic","score_opus":0.03572342930087379,"score_gpt":0.21729913813655094,"score_spread":0.18157570883567714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160608726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063024987,0.059582297,0.0087057175,0.28779617,0.008166107,0.000052515334,0.00013467987,0.000105121915,0.6291549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50644237,0.04306242,0.008998581,0.12072394,0.012053031,0.00026637438,0.000081435115,0.00021333498,0.30815846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595684,0.0023893616,0.00013814375,0.0004867696,0.00073933176,0.0002894677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960665,0.002927285,0.0001870569,0.00017964742,0.0004347748,0.00020467835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032994996,0.0004981905,0.00040499368,0.001277026,0.007493327,0.0048324154,0.00078152545,0.005069593,0.0050052567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009013011,0.00023913947,0.0002813503,0.0008445044,0.018476553,0.0061962605,0.0030997985,0.008156511,0.0015572795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008971918,0.000004874641,0.000055321507,0.000046042816,0.0000014800482,0.00007127552,0.0042618485,0.000050050505,0.00004908127,0.92691094,0.062313702,0.0062263985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038041667,0.0000077063805,0.00012774886,0.0002165295,0.000002111232,0.00011030974,0.0011193481,0.00010342469,0.00010023261,0.17111301,0.82708687,0.00000874133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007933219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008554596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007933219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005664083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031094356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041095972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161800791","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0056","title":"Propositions and Propositional Acts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Philosophy; Speech act; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029001187213141138,"score_gpt":0.28673428841779175,"score_spread":0.2577331012046506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161800791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08997408,0.020483848,0.15445824,0.027257726,0.0009413324,0.00017749105,0.0005702172,0.00032015887,0.7058169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559581,0.004205603,0.02145953,0.0015801453,0.0004990932,0.00016989654,0.00027991628,0.00006955598,0.015778098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954692,0.003153685,0.00018354373,0.0004209447,0.00039495475,0.00037768055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953342,0.0033187345,0.0004246991,0.00041466876,0.00033004986,0.00017768792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033122543,0.0006770129,0.0004209294,0.0019035401,0.0034606648,0.005671105,0.0009481971,0.002422136,0.0070156245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059484406,0.00043106737,0.0006657946,0.0018631127,0.019354984,0.009669572,0.0028567472,0.0032259154,0.0008712083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004393971,0.0000024223477,0.00007487898,0.000013627479,0.0000019769757,0.000036991856,0.0012622268,0.00006864123,0.000021529084,0.9969048,0.0004366928,0.0011718429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074174104,0.000007719863,0.00027323377,0.000044093827,0.000005488358,0.00010351852,0.0012264281,0.0005670489,0.00008817045,0.9730558,0.024614042,0.0000070560145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036078533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001744565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070156245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033987034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012601592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024659395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169179198","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0046","title":"The Scrambler: An Argument Against Representationalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Direct and indirect realism; Intentionality; Philosophy; Consciousness; Epistemology; Perception; Argument (complex analysis); Content (measure theory); Philosophy of mind; Analytic philosophy; Psychology; Contemporary philosophy; Metaphysics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03292292217657917,"score_gpt":0.31274860432371276,"score_spread":0.2798256821471336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169179198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029455062,0.013198781,0.17525664,0.2658248,0.0032592309,0.000104367566,0.00037544692,0.0005932351,0.5119324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8968668,0.0031205702,0.027980588,0.03299498,0.0039240024,0.00029827803,0.00018611798,0.0006300029,0.0339986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99084646,0.004297369,0.00032604995,0.0014933343,0.0022532723,0.00078360754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98926204,0.006472529,0.000615793,0.0020820887,0.0011782474,0.00038924997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010391889,0.0009130773,0.0012562834,0.0026736748,0.005251959,0.0076883747,0.003402915,0.008606759,0.008832966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020446194,0.00070233905,0.0019102041,0.0015251937,0.041987043,0.019200677,0.008796854,0.015296022,0.002278488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007820171,0.0000031399236,0.000018526565,0.000014270746,0.000003321139,0.00002029859,0.0004706785,0.000041824223,0.000032813874,0.9971852,0.001396977,0.00080516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018998358,0.0000052864716,0.00002560488,0.000027230559,0.0000041044964,0.00003590367,0.000106035404,0.00030408564,0.0000806085,0.9888104,0.010575092,0.0000065695845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033108017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016485623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010391889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005716793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022981667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054958224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268281984","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2000.10717529","title":"J.P. Burgess and G. Rosen A Subject with no Object. Oxford: Clarendon1997. Pp. x + 259.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"History and Theory of Mathematics","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Object (grammar); Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; General interest; Epistemology; Linguistics; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.022807359142566968,"score_gpt":0.23085168949700494,"score_spread":0.20804433035443798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268281984","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00058094756,0.8602451,0.0031018092,0.021663444,0.0059209564,0.000013923918,0.00041949327,0.0001281689,0.107926145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031965703,0.6809217,0.006716927,0.004631507,0.009704807,0.0000738986,0.00089044846,0.00056392077,0.26453117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937195,0.00017148862,0.00007208709,0.00011134793,0.00021729938,0.000055818753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863166,0.0007070267,0.00014193806,0.000118432305,0.00028032376,0.00012062624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012464301,0.0021866197,0.0013113087,0.0039720377,0.002385316,0.0038584028,0.0013280951,0.002907852,0.06106112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031439713,0.0015856134,0.00083286123,0.004131984,0.0058642295,0.010104585,0.0015509785,0.0039033603,0.027188964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055707904,0.000030333014,0.00025327376,0.00070694415,0.000026702193,0.00012554387,0.0012652149,0.00016553991,0.00020833671,0.14281651,0.76540333,0.08894255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008963454,0.000014632387,0.0010766146,0.0007564441,0.00001870419,0.00032378454,0.0004215227,0.000081137034,0.000117606214,0.10844439,0.88872117,0.000015033468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014066081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030374033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06106112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029542795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022013276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20426977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276512997","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2011.0004","title":"Elliott Sober, Evidence and Evolution: The Logic Behind the Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2008. Pp. xx + 392.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08880432681029264,"score_gpt":0.20606379134197442,"score_spread":0.11725946453168178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276512997","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007860862,0.91319674,0.011966361,0.040440604,0.0017271555,0.00002328945,0.0005556014,0.00015517326,0.031148987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05660213,0.85627276,0.030423895,0.012612719,0.0066761984,0.00016185817,0.0006750181,0.00036898366,0.036206424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976076,0.0010343924,0.00029590228,0.00027073128,0.00065118086,0.0001402089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917748,0.0061266534,0.00039764465,0.00042257097,0.0010554411,0.00022292722],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050202063,0.002393183,0.0021979683,0.006795562,0.002345588,0.0050958158,0.0024705306,0.005345687,0.020857858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0119892,0.0021317292,0.0014209652,0.005706113,0.012423854,0.01607435,0.0018758854,0.005736711,0.0065180603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011878864,0.000043514214,0.0011697662,0.00134816,0.00018320832,0.00047931855,0.0018122011,0.0015370115,0.0002680323,0.42024168,0.43507004,0.13772832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035219033,0.000010105984,0.0019330238,0.0010565136,0.000063639345,0.00033996004,0.00057685934,0.00042730957,0.0002240562,0.71233827,0.28294435,0.000050764134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023148758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042602103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99765444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004839187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039584422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069776535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283049953","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2000.10717524","title":"Making Do: Troubling Stoic Tendencies in an Otherwise Compelling Theory of Autonomy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Argument (complex analysis); Autonomy; Nothing; Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Worry; Moral responsibility; Free will; Philosophy; Moral agency; Law and economics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.10142586991914194,"score_gpt":0.27668237153852937,"score_spread":0.17525650161938744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283049953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31006694,0.0021422352,0.06742556,0.10499374,0.00049875217,0.00005310807,0.000044780074,0.00012987434,0.514645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868826,0.00036837504,0.0056296894,0.0022227103,0.00006048949,0.000039162886,0.000010874881,0.000021919146,0.0047641573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972139,0.0014498136,0.000082237224,0.00043302678,0.00056001684,0.0002609459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727887,0.0013921692,0.00044059186,0.00042417643,0.00022749348,0.00023665464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041071395,0.00026590886,0.0003489677,0.00086314714,0.0039818995,0.0041028,0.0006847496,0.002899294,0.0020725392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068674097,0.00022452208,0.0003948857,0.00046839012,0.03316746,0.0069214334,0.003959063,0.003741121,0.00030623638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006045026,0.0000047216577,0.00021014223,0.000008322342,0.0000018066635,0.00004322627,0.0045115403,0.00009530195,0.00009404624,0.99247617,0.000635277,0.0019135202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008556651,0.00000675195,0.0002151787,0.00001890697,0.0000021454673,0.00007172859,0.0016318433,0.00041836267,0.0001018742,0.98847467,0.009044346,0.0000056966537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017809093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027353405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041071395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002454988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021515633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021720827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289845231","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2004.10716578","title":"Spinoza and the<i>a priori</i>","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"A priori and a posteriori; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027844585641954116,"score_gpt":0.20407082467760784,"score_spread":0.17622623903565374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289845231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038684364,0.027988626,0.030435495,0.06426187,0.0016547799,0.000026862119,0.00014569271,0.00013858637,0.8366638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92598844,0.005177484,0.007372153,0.0042745885,0.00049465965,0.00004951823,0.00007316205,0.000110244815,0.056459825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852705,0.000740202,0.00005634848,0.00025741674,0.00022612161,0.00019284223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998993,0.00042934585,0.00010459424,0.00018825868,0.00015297809,0.00013179264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002064521,0.00040173676,0.00043098023,0.0010800307,0.007463991,0.008259555,0.0005712411,0.001883496,0.005489441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001852399,0.00032546904,0.0005271073,0.0010158409,0.03323946,0.0078979675,0.0028812385,0.004333876,0.00085772166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004051672,0.0000014882942,0.000034169643,0.000007798141,9.032601e-7,0.000008264513,0.0005057525,0.000021814454,0.000017483948,0.9976826,0.00080001523,0.000915672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053463536,0.000005407183,0.0001613118,0.000049321807,0.0000033711797,0.000039784245,0.0008048555,0.00015181409,0.000066300214,0.9360654,0.06263996,0.0000071333443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011054975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014371985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011054975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062876167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004373086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045620084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290752124","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2004.10716575","title":"Can't We All Just Respect One Another a Little Less?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Morality; Objectivity (philosophy); Philosophy; Centrality; Relation (database); Contemporary philosophy; Foundation (evidence); Analytic philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.15183231025111418,"score_gpt":0.32816319110817116,"score_spread":0.17633088085705698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290752124","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010261363,0.033226997,0.008205016,0.8081879,0.008234718,0.000021376136,0.00006254107,0.00013271396,0.13166739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.504167,0.025356675,0.0063875606,0.37192637,0.008020775,0.00011168505,0.00015166108,0.0004294411,0.08344883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98593396,0.007364369,0.00038573728,0.0015111403,0.0032984263,0.0015063826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98656994,0.0045233076,0.0016188672,0.00181033,0.0025981264,0.0028795002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00874221,0.0007609247,0.0014560138,0.0011920535,0.009743022,0.015159369,0.0019538186,0.0077688023,0.011614056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024381539,0.00044919678,0.00071618427,0.0014186003,0.06514462,0.030842071,0.008588501,0.016804427,0.004764665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000784782,0.00008386906,0.001676903,0.0003631461,0.000108558226,0.00017450297,0.016764898,0.00013274398,0.0004884471,0.76679796,0.1563553,0.05697517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017523049,0.00007008445,0.00084146304,0.00044276236,0.00003168763,0.00024944058,0.012672931,0.000094682386,0.00027416807,0.52468866,0.4605652,0.000051417177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057644644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008357248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015159369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00550797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006734137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046233773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295037080","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2001.10717561","title":"Matter and Aristotle's Material Cause","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Philosophy; Epistemology; Virtue; The Thing; Aesthetics; Living matter; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.03581503502933266,"score_gpt":0.20819654376927524,"score_spread":0.17238150873994257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295037080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020617036,0.011043135,0.04848456,0.013745664,0.00078400166,0.000060902632,0.0001536384,0.00018434937,0.9049267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87933666,0.0056296294,0.027446412,0.0034252699,0.0009681944,0.00012847997,0.00015139216,0.00011500221,0.08279894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837554,0.00053492334,0.000056741042,0.00026992586,0.00055006775,0.00021275225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993962,0.00026381953,0.000051236457,0.00009496226,0.00014215257,0.000051617582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017683256,0.0006021839,0.0005509783,0.0025306733,0.0052265525,0.0035731157,0.0007107405,0.0030021057,0.004843249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017584136,0.0004782624,0.0007113771,0.0010261822,0.02826811,0.0054253894,0.002356541,0.002587972,0.0009570258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002926758,0.0000017585579,0.000024290364,0.000010485973,0.0000013084467,0.000017494056,0.00042035736,0.00008232525,0.000018368284,0.9979729,0.0005780002,0.00086976355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010655929,0.000009508515,0.00017607228,0.00002570967,0.000003294653,0.000037157577,0.00016578095,0.0001874219,0.00006597147,0.9577379,0.041572917,0.000007659567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010792059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013360359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010792059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059902566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030773615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043462515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2311295274","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2000.10717534","title":"Statistical Method and the Peircean Account of Truth","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Epistemology; Ascription; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Commit; Pragmatic theory of truth; Coherence theory of truth; Alethiology; Truth condition; Computer science","score_opus":0.0249108205537783,"score_gpt":0.24255717964465728,"score_spread":0.21764635909087898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2311295274","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010106863,0.019595772,0.7397613,0.08511453,0.0013087537,0.00012515052,0.00028790813,0.0003266056,0.14337318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74943024,0.010636754,0.2080688,0.010009689,0.0039660037,0.0008671413,0.00022431063,0.00028900668,0.016508093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9690467,0.021300029,0.0011236812,0.0025352435,0.005402076,0.0005923643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92368716,0.063828066,0.0026072804,0.005950109,0.0033509445,0.0005765602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038858607,0.0008253311,0.0015199728,0.007031711,0.0035111767,0.0075288443,0.0022590389,0.0033113854,0.00495576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060884763,0.00071957,0.0014690141,0.005304068,0.047755208,0.010480949,0.0038292864,0.005008644,0.000738451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032323217,0.0000027141684,0.000091050264,0.000025552183,0.0000077521845,0.000013371689,0.0002207595,0.0002740195,0.000010603955,0.9964276,0.0005686429,0.0023546533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041506555,0.0000040797713,0.000065553206,0.000021462738,0.0000024300284,0.000022826405,0.000038053317,0.00072606537,0.00002201108,0.99485874,0.0042312667,0.0000034127806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028717304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019820698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038858607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069511975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061076875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20550644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318527100","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1162349","title":"Human rights and the rights of states: a relational account","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sovereignty; Human rights; Statism; Morality; Political science; Norm (philosophy); Law; Fundamental rights; State (computer science); Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.04495130499461853,"score_gpt":0.29355386286122864,"score_spread":0.24860255786661012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318527100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0489516,0.004830763,0.089168794,0.047246102,0.00026022474,0.00006573754,0.00015570754,0.00006884683,0.80925226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98709714,0.0011480775,0.0030980953,0.0011405508,0.00020577929,0.000044544548,0.000034904217,0.000023285704,0.0072076027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952697,0.0027237767,0.00013089472,0.00063764036,0.00086926884,0.0003686347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961397,0.0020302774,0.00042334513,0.00066732545,0.00043791617,0.00030143038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046127215,0.00035595967,0.00045572405,0.0016385152,0.0027155718,0.0086508775,0.0011423761,0.002809166,0.008958197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048483764,0.00028764666,0.0005539081,0.0013723355,0.041379377,0.012706511,0.0068180794,0.003899054,0.0006297796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010203211,0.000001520828,0.000023842103,0.000003055263,0.0000010202675,0.000005799502,0.00027325426,0.00010109328,0.000011333875,0.99926203,0.00008222973,0.00023367794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044131107,0.000003013515,0.0000876763,0.000027671971,0.0000027970761,0.000016449289,0.0004720582,0.00044474498,0.00002934904,0.99184144,0.0070679504,0.000002518496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00531902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026917385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008958197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046077785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023016373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033431947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318606975","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1165571","title":"Psychopathy and internalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Externalism; Psychology; Counterexample; Moral disengagement; Moral psychology; Epistemology; Moral reasoning; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09279190722121253,"score_gpt":0.2581394660802139,"score_spread":0.16534755885900135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318606975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9491816,0.0005408198,0.0019036386,0.00608824,0.00009591472,0.000035511508,0.00006972351,0.000054979162,0.042029455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984932,0.00017084245,0.00034029424,0.0003662381,0.000015712521,0.000009921725,0.000016460961,0.00000798289,0.00057930534],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983865,0.00046784568,0.0000620989,0.00033554074,0.00050623,0.0002418752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920242,0.0018381268,0.0032676235,0.0009500493,0.0009119147,0.0010081079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002037815,0.00039311757,0.00037466237,0.0019084385,0.0012075843,0.001786573,0.0004548038,0.00088990066,0.007071843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107676005,0.00027671558,0.00028462295,0.0005386929,0.009924459,0.0012201075,0.0030710644,0.0023795608,0.00033352163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004463563,0.0013256012,0.72465414,0.0004379268,0.0002886016,0.0044969567,0.02445798,0.00086876046,0.011957682,0.12588535,0.0075572464,0.09762341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008376981,0.0003360909,0.7415539,0.0006396914,0.00014439409,0.006706041,0.011091158,0.0017520683,0.0025721155,0.22551098,0.009521789,0.00008810956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014730507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014835198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007071843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017517088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011892833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02365768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321929654","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1152535","title":"Non-mereological pluralistic supersubstantivalism: an alternative perspective on the matter/spacetime relationship","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Spacetime; Spacetime topology; Mereology; Causal sets; Spherically symmetric spacetime; Stationary spacetime; Quantum field theory in curved spacetime; Spacetime symmetries; Theoretical physics; Epistemology; Physics; Philosophy; Quantum mechanics; Quantum gravity; Quantum","score_opus":0.06276529155814807,"score_gpt":0.31191783974272475,"score_spread":0.24915254818457666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321929654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10586772,0.003270308,0.22828107,0.051685113,0.0009886599,0.00009072526,0.00013215489,0.00027612428,0.60940814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97039324,0.00047090676,0.016925644,0.00169326,0.00044161596,0.00004766292,0.000038111248,0.000086408356,0.009903174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518234,0.0021884886,0.00024137317,0.0007758973,0.0012133459,0.00039839183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960334,0.0012673633,0.0004688223,0.0010736999,0.00080638344,0.00035044557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059458725,0.00038774995,0.00075331266,0.0014679004,0.0045779063,0.007299951,0.0019579495,0.0028187193,0.0041881143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004942887,0.00053447095,0.0012132331,0.0011722624,0.031614535,0.010444308,0.0071394388,0.0067413175,0.0006227182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002028117,0.0000020957157,0.000019095589,0.0000046345012,0.0000012855437,0.000017486738,0.00046696255,0.000042013362,0.000041894775,0.99900824,0.00014612355,0.0002480987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005036288,0.0000045643924,0.000052760894,0.0000112624375,0.000003827078,0.00004069708,0.00030568163,0.00085649843,0.000091544236,0.99085706,0.007765348,0.0000056197728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039238525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004884926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007299951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006154412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002368321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044653654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2420378534","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1193406","title":"The logical form of negative action sentences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Action (physics); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Agency (philosophy); Event (particle physics); Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Logical analysis; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08662138808633635,"score_gpt":0.2651004181185032,"score_spread":0.17847903003216686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2420378534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19873007,0.00212673,0.367523,0.033206336,0.0016131423,0.00016019196,0.0010365022,0.00094728614,0.39465672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97887933,0.00024613665,0.013537956,0.0013534909,0.00025164653,0.00006837641,0.00025513742,0.00009984685,0.0053080735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956572,0.0023961088,0.0003302729,0.000605485,0.0007489101,0.0002619402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933175,0.0034162856,0.0006850406,0.00046426532,0.0018342885,0.00028260084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005612806,0.00063996617,0.0004906013,0.0011435678,0.0023275411,0.0035116738,0.0011363048,0.0016647713,0.0051468867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009263942,0.00049526605,0.0005665097,0.0006606889,0.008928655,0.008287189,0.0030495103,0.0027235951,0.0005681999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020335636,0.0000074594977,0.00018460666,0.000058632544,0.000008030273,0.00015191687,0.0017225745,0.00012191879,0.00072607,0.99375796,0.0014684645,0.0017720759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020043677,0.000018830207,0.0003072083,0.000063704814,0.00002026738,0.00022447479,0.0010380648,0.0019774043,0.0010030732,0.9740737,0.021230934,0.000022331313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014338107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012624814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005612806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002682946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008750382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02968371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463359842","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2002.10716516","title":"Origins Are Not Essences in Evolutionary Systematics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Natural selection; Selection (genetic algorithm); Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Inference; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Psychology; History; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Archaeology","score_opus":0.08524593220961214,"score_gpt":0.20774232345750748,"score_spread":0.12249639124789534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2463359842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18681969,0.046297286,0.26991096,0.08410503,0.002240745,0.00009338271,0.00057948014,0.0006833084,0.40927023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9544177,0.005983738,0.020149525,0.002420152,0.0006303717,0.0000609897,0.0001209867,0.00015868283,0.016057923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972078,0.0013454846,0.00017512926,0.0005776772,0.00045885376,0.00023508999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99480563,0.0025974002,0.00047218433,0.0013716085,0.00052311097,0.00023006019],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035017163,0.00043605827,0.00067835016,0.0013616302,0.0022505524,0.004618832,0.00077922386,0.0014461081,0.004738273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009728595,0.00048321165,0.0005140241,0.0010082038,0.024063997,0.0154904,0.0031051596,0.0029333546,0.00064674765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000088095,0.0000033977226,0.00095159083,0.00006842828,0.000017074472,0.000035262576,0.0015914399,0.00020983371,0.00016351251,0.98831403,0.0006307194,0.008005873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000114172935,0.000011931969,0.0011639183,0.00006198941,0.000018689472,0.000111745896,0.00069040153,0.00023813538,0.00012899784,0.95564216,0.04190941,0.000011065651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014720206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020512599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99774945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021449847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010634576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018519044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467609113","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2001.10717572","title":"Rational Choice with Deontic Constraints","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Point (geometry); Advertising; Law and economics; Free riding; Free rider problem; Marketing; Internet privacy; Economics; Microeconomics; Public good; Computer science","score_opus":0.04614076893581058,"score_gpt":0.2989282900366215,"score_spread":0.25278752110081093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467609113","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026923517,0.007419813,0.5231431,0.027970076,0.00069905206,0.00024527582,0.0015560681,0.00036961728,0.41167346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7965463,0.0049212794,0.14059334,0.0034582012,0.001159662,0.0007178397,0.0013180762,0.0002144522,0.051070888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934861,0.003504773,0.00039464736,0.0008697395,0.0012564529,0.0004883538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98970675,0.0072497027,0.0004937544,0.0013654935,0.0008194923,0.0003647445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008447032,0.0012290762,0.001268481,0.0010186577,0.002247614,0.00570416,0.0020254527,0.0030306098,0.011257345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0136190485,0.001190059,0.0014347723,0.0015006198,0.0066212304,0.009899778,0.0028983445,0.004843809,0.0014069263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000109988505,0.000005822463,0.000039915874,0.000022082166,0.0000076562355,0.000031372936,0.00009148658,0.0011039419,0.000031238647,0.9959752,0.0011358873,0.0015444215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001887289,0.0000033922397,0.00003213974,0.000014104412,0.0000054632783,0.000015505491,0.000030361809,0.0026766367,0.000024700978,0.99066424,0.006509983,0.0000046046853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009251084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008947472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011257345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00553543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036716906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044672728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474551991","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.812371","title":"Spinoza on essence and ideal individuation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Individuation; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Relation (database); Simple (philosophy); Object (grammar); Ideal (ethics); Property (philosophy); Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.04373868343928102,"score_gpt":0.21872080797610954,"score_spread":0.17498212453682851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474551991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06828609,0.013057492,0.07542408,0.043369893,0.0010811809,0.000059898626,0.00014109905,0.00012407827,0.7984562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95537376,0.0024509889,0.010203006,0.0040019862,0.00035938632,0.00007654944,0.000044052143,0.00006577123,0.027424295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980792,0.0008929346,0.00006287761,0.00031400964,0.00035915512,0.00029187245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918956,0.0003392887,0.00007662936,0.00014836328,0.00014015174,0.00010597152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027027258,0.00037186427,0.00048685624,0.0014535222,0.004081164,0.0045865932,0.0006255729,0.0016511179,0.0035302055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002551507,0.00020460483,0.000563483,0.0007266361,0.026696773,0.007831161,0.0041078455,0.00342775,0.00043915986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020132948,0.0000011174416,0.00002433673,0.0000032854932,4.7026376e-7,0.0000049297014,0.00026657456,0.00002308037,0.000010909218,0.9990392,0.00021406799,0.00041010784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004239055,0.0000035637067,0.00009724421,0.0000124904345,0.0000020501545,0.000020850024,0.00026833912,0.00012415586,0.000040031682,0.9802169,0.019206502,0.00000366547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005138953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038948394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005138953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048218304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022347015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034985065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475106116","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2003.10716551","title":"Kant on Sensibility and the Understanding in the 1770s","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Nothing; Metaphysics; Sensibility; Critical philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.11597161719384437,"score_gpt":0.23575180517224362,"score_spread":0.11978018797839925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475106116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026007613,0.0652597,0.014125951,0.05328316,0.0012588083,0.000032790304,0.00014115857,0.00006823177,0.8398226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9076831,0.014766591,0.004556534,0.0070647015,0.0008756583,0.00011410458,0.00008162896,0.00012101647,0.0647367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940177,0.0038805897,0.0001603996,0.00045632603,0.0009319591,0.000552959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983041,0.0010528517,0.00012247374,0.00019555443,0.00021062866,0.000114299466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060365973,0.0009847948,0.00074040226,0.002863622,0.007364682,0.010553232,0.0009762704,0.004883503,0.0035845952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005624574,0.00059459696,0.0006549922,0.0022767922,0.05818391,0.010958294,0.0047319965,0.007423708,0.0011546094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003964557,0.0000015026782,0.000019401281,0.000008656137,9.62336e-7,0.000008950275,0.00244807,0.00007094603,0.000014592436,0.995388,0.0010772407,0.0009578445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051836105,0.0000038516478,0.0000823986,0.000098669385,0.0000020577058,0.000018000504,0.00091985025,0.000056701385,0.00006383771,0.9448715,0.05387089,0.000007108363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011392935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008908499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020051943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020051943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058134845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14548773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489572628","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2000.10717547","title":"From Communitarianism to Republicanism: On Sandel and His Critics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Communitarianism; Content (measure theory); Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Liberalism; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03322508919717452,"score_gpt":0.27647319577936935,"score_spread":0.24324810658219484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489572628","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042187583,0.014527394,0.0018196385,0.7019612,0.0021544406,0.00001199952,0.000043939122,0.00006616791,0.23722762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92309225,0.004705229,0.00038009687,0.044211254,0.0019441044,0.00002181519,0.000013590078,0.000104165905,0.025527412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583614,0.0024928993,0.0000954879,0.00031703123,0.0006824912,0.0005760387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99446976,0.004259429,0.0002740968,0.00028592677,0.000502569,0.00020827024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00568828,0.00034623232,0.00057752454,0.0012080744,0.008389232,0.006738109,0.00085447263,0.005702078,0.0027066912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012068165,0.00021818734,0.00026500228,0.0014515636,0.048815407,0.005426691,0.0033436618,0.00977309,0.00039556855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002473894,0.000007846719,0.00014072593,0.000027776647,0.0000045161014,0.00007073634,0.0054090857,0.00010271231,0.000016482294,0.96441835,0.024789425,0.004987676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051867777,0.00001577697,0.0008244147,0.00027751163,0.000012386639,0.00017939758,0.010029401,0.00055835303,0.0003272488,0.7749009,0.21278541,0.000037242175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023652665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031510256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023652665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008073768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046896706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058579504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508304136","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2008.0002","title":"Elisabeth A. Lloyd The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: Harvard University Press2005.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Orgasm; Sociology; Economic history; History; Gender studies; Human sexuality","score_opus":0.04919226334920433,"score_gpt":0.20475750140353596,"score_spread":0.15556523805433164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508304136","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000980439,0.83677024,0.0038915596,0.10144892,0.0060407184,0.000012218778,0.00014086392,0.00006336598,0.05065177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.083368905,0.7308566,0.0077629397,0.039200887,0.013920866,0.00005477407,0.00014618391,0.00017324822,0.124515645],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941957,0.0002325593,0.000036330614,0.00009851501,0.00017259496,0.000040461222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983021,0.0010849211,0.000099856654,0.000083647275,0.00025888399,0.00017063376],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018839362,0.00058264675,0.0006756786,0.0015406823,0.0015735413,0.0018267522,0.0010684483,0.0032421844,0.011656883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038095326,0.0006050305,0.00035603126,0.0010507891,0.007101796,0.0050034095,0.00083519326,0.0037613122,0.0034943211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100514,0.000026762622,0.00043471088,0.00049284264,0.000032434484,0.00032152783,0.0018307432,0.00019499146,0.00048127378,0.23956622,0.6617734,0.094744645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025019694,0.000022414379,0.0019988753,0.0006298489,0.000020595598,0.0009143575,0.00069236715,0.00015635192,0.00042361088,0.23193379,0.7631454,0.00003730114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008389552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014408261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99842644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016956241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015566234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03899616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515709034","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1218254","title":"Mental causation, compatibilism and counterfactuals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibilism; Causation; Counterfactual conditional; Free will; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Counterfactual thinking","score_opus":0.04129434277311143,"score_gpt":0.2357986121983564,"score_spread":0.19450426942524499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515709034","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10193382,0.0067393295,0.4601034,0.07941952,0.0019078312,0.00013312197,0.00022059961,0.00043644017,0.34910586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733385,0.00076999713,0.019335568,0.0018395291,0.0005758801,0.00009599017,0.00006106012,0.00006249716,0.003920861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900149,0.005902775,0.0004250454,0.0014390316,0.0017412947,0.0004769175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836442,0.011165137,0.0013907228,0.002027999,0.0011800819,0.00059188524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011557757,0.00072081643,0.0011121412,0.0034623358,0.0028841717,0.0056936736,0.0020993224,0.0048113777,0.012861955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019548422,0.0007308536,0.0014389368,0.001583838,0.024058254,0.011537636,0.0075001847,0.005632105,0.00071840006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007454702,0.000005158297,0.000055644992,0.00001331921,0.000008970365,0.000032080763,0.00012530445,0.0002429317,0.00003857516,0.9984257,0.00031878974,0.00072597805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006015618,0.0000024515157,0.0000473397,0.000008445385,0.0000033656465,0.000024858946,0.000031901352,0.0005740708,0.000040856496,0.99767977,0.0015763665,0.0000045880433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019114199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010472798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012861955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003123197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016157951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061123967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519232365","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716600","title":"The Ethical Significance of National Settlement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Human settlement; Doctrine; Quarter (Canadian coin); Obstacle; History; Middle East; Political science; Law; Ethnology; Archaeology; Economics","score_opus":0.06745263494160067,"score_gpt":0.33944931321179916,"score_spread":0.27199667827019847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519232365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039642427,0.0056811096,0.007523585,0.13271199,0.0012563848,0.00001935108,0.00002050103,0.000022433413,0.81312215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659484,0.0011384323,0.0015097188,0.010859236,0.00051902625,0.000040095652,0.000013349479,0.000023656234,0.019948099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852983,0.009875521,0.00035447144,0.0010250722,0.002008322,0.0014383241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99218893,0.0042846026,0.0006023134,0.0008324958,0.0011451219,0.00094654236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013304356,0.00019959816,0.0003273199,0.00044592796,0.010321906,0.009350605,0.0008634955,0.004742669,0.0032171097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015763994,0.0001515801,0.00022694899,0.000528599,0.04989797,0.0053324657,0.0065387595,0.0057152966,0.00044839593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037781942,0.0000042163956,0.00029488406,0.000009378055,0.0000012707939,0.000045990182,0.006099706,0.00004020519,0.000030428166,0.9872069,0.0033891571,0.0028740698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010938637,0.000012188974,0.00074237667,0.0001997974,0.0000046554337,0.0002551179,0.01413867,0.00031638253,0.00016984227,0.7162924,0.2678434,0.0000142485615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047997367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078100115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013304356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070884773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008431415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07036096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531119672","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1235856","title":"Kant’s deductions of morality and freedom","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main; Simon Fraser University; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Morality; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05596386193333154,"score_gpt":0.2243051721624456,"score_spread":0.16834131022911408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531119672","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042905375,0.002799134,0.1039627,0.042354494,0.0010840175,0.00008266664,0.00019746224,0.00013481331,0.80647945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764473,0.0004753609,0.0084213335,0.0021974274,0.00035788585,0.00007305959,0.000063031715,0.00006171856,0.011902784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890693,0.005938533,0.000342477,0.0008808098,0.002842458,0.0009263773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99173003,0.004880039,0.00042850574,0.001301075,0.0012034709,0.00045672138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009321243,0.00063177885,0.0010429467,0.0028285256,0.0039731963,0.007086752,0.0013640599,0.0046086293,0.005256303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014399616,0.0005261079,0.0013381686,0.0009454402,0.058821376,0.006521322,0.0067416904,0.008610189,0.00083791715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035572818,0.000002914688,0.000017556307,0.0000068311833,0.0000021114179,0.00000983847,0.0002552831,0.00015579138,0.00001971365,0.9986437,0.00042239827,0.00046033048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055718638,0.0000016996273,0.00003075074,0.000017168426,0.000001243455,0.000006373107,0.00007903293,0.00014828345,0.000043098487,0.995832,0.0038318594,0.0000029236064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029390347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018848098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009321243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074385046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003996047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053970397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2541780161","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1250201","title":"John Locke, ‘Hobbist’: of sleeping souls and thinking matter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Medieval and Classical Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Soul; Metaphysics; Materialism; Epistemology; Suspect; Relation (database); False accusation; Law","score_opus":0.028449510434281306,"score_gpt":0.20241392596738636,"score_spread":0.17396441553310504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2541780161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040496442,0.087500624,0.012700164,0.37057737,0.007630738,0.000033409604,0.000093085444,0.00013431971,0.48083374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87586945,0.011473046,0.0039186,0.034656584,0.002342398,0.000040089282,0.000032465257,0.00016629799,0.0715011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890876,0.0007011209,0.000020691123,0.00011155954,0.00017643314,0.000081394915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983553,0.000992204,0.00009100492,0.000097415,0.00025797234,0.0002060131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016781235,0.00026704022,0.00030148026,0.0008589857,0.005966394,0.004445323,0.00048759583,0.0023028597,0.0047569177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003868399,0.00022879882,0.00014885991,0.0005924061,0.02911259,0.006975775,0.0018291328,0.005097743,0.0006929447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030480596,0.000011060457,0.000174133,0.000049642433,0.000004491499,0.00012799077,0.025551872,0.000049346716,0.00011603144,0.92753583,0.039899264,0.0064498014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017768934,0.000018210534,0.0005609002,0.00021884457,0.000006153465,0.00033293298,0.016246576,0.00023544728,0.00027567334,0.43060127,0.55145884,0.00002738521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0130250985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022318225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0130250985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026543532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018804516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025898576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561537140","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2007.0013","title":"Brute Requirements - Gert Joshua, Brute Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press2004.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Evolving Legal Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Computer science; Content (measure theory); Operations research; Library science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.053848892955886796,"score_gpt":0.2720914852537166,"score_spread":0.21824259229782983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561537140","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012714479,0.7418046,0.0031876238,0.07211691,0.002843596,0.000024527148,0.00093904376,0.00018057344,0.17763178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11964317,0.58493656,0.008391207,0.0143516995,0.004121151,0.00026096075,0.0013026454,0.00050202303,0.26649064],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986303,0.00045467616,0.0001370164,0.00022111228,0.00040387243,0.000152987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983444,0.0009032528,0.00013744013,0.00015045091,0.00035617145,0.00010825014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021231782,0.0021723732,0.0010639598,0.003058295,0.00334648,0.005030879,0.0014089665,0.00541829,0.035374917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048959227,0.0016892996,0.0006420246,0.0052571604,0.0066383546,0.01168097,0.0017065924,0.00528906,0.011909157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058212976,0.00003523926,0.00036296298,0.0003497108,0.000026630676,0.00015555529,0.0016120615,0.00046126667,0.00012891031,0.29715443,0.64305145,0.056603618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002630074,0.000010896723,0.0019149905,0.0010783874,0.000020834827,0.00017454455,0.0011361643,0.00019940076,0.00015975552,0.19478446,0.8004688,0.00002552113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04910808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1057313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04910808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00628691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006629173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11834085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575256104","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1269986","title":"Beauty, the social network","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Sociality; Beauty; Contemplation; Aesthetics; Aesthetic value; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.02967625898053613,"score_gpt":0.2264034633618374,"score_spread":0.19672720438130126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2575256104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40898427,0.005782188,0.055978123,0.04116551,0.00065441994,0.00009116294,0.0010246881,0.00021087998,0.48610878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98734236,0.00091821625,0.002877137,0.00019396539,0.00013346934,0.000021658683,0.00010562856,0.000015301277,0.008392281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909973,0.00039540222,0.00002829389,0.00018658873,0.00022477297,0.000065181135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99449533,0.0028934851,0.0010883821,0.00037804077,0.0005173363,0.0006272714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010330628,0.00018773635,0.00022166522,0.0021596188,0.0025143607,0.0047387723,0.0004958504,0.00090166274,0.009747342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065550604,0.00016316492,0.00016576608,0.002983541,0.0042933724,0.006056572,0.0016535973,0.0007001441,0.00044925764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003752478,0.000037804883,0.010513261,0.00007841336,0.000025252239,0.00025582148,0.0033189896,0.0027805464,0.00021009614,0.943823,0.009764864,0.029154396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023233042,0.000034905876,0.011466298,0.00007925058,0.000030238492,0.0005254763,0.0050493088,0.012641252,0.00016568736,0.8668025,0.10315271,0.000029189996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067908647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062690405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009747342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002348061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011478661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03260815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586999247","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1286886","title":"Critical Notice of <i>Beyond the Analytic-Continental Divide: Pluralist Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century</i>. Edited by Jeffrey A. Bell, Andrew Cutrofello, and Paul M. Livingston (New York: Routledge, 2016. 334 + viii pp)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Analytic philosophy; Notice; Political philosophy; Continental philosophy; Ontology; Personhood; Meaning (existential); Politics; Agency (philosophy); Contemporary philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.040745096591124866,"score_gpt":0.25842399026233626,"score_spread":0.2176788936712114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586999247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056161573,0.19793986,0.002735796,0.71550524,0.018958334,0.000033709897,0.00008069836,0.000041713673,0.059088487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4860776,0.1970571,0.0061497604,0.1569053,0.043867614,0.00040085646,0.00019493917,0.00041911192,0.10892776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952389,0.0034028725,0.000103271945,0.00027871013,0.0006664296,0.0003099212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889753,0.0086972015,0.00036166306,0.00035916732,0.00096909906,0.00063758076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009094916,0.0007145781,0.000684336,0.0025019716,0.0097731,0.014658041,0.0016719478,0.0052036997,0.004181398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007953533,0.00036013295,0.000468861,0.0028756121,0.034219984,0.013216116,0.005479849,0.009614527,0.0005074363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000214532,0.000020083098,0.00019317752,0.00027517977,0.000006587252,0.00017042753,0.04611197,0.000112232345,0.0001112531,0.5944273,0.3428351,0.015715232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007972499,0.000010527703,0.00046499894,0.0013757114,0.000003794545,0.0001360582,0.034258425,0.000104743514,0.000118781,0.13723499,0.826261,0.00002310942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02118381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0463966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02118381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014693447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00960165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10660893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596494602","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1301776","title":"Hobbes’s agnostic theology before <i>Leviathan</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Agnosticism; Philosophy; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Existence of God; Epistemology; Faith; Subject (documents); Atheism; Reflexive pronoun; Theism","score_opus":0.048130816466386256,"score_gpt":0.2460425757805446,"score_spread":0.19791175931415833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596494602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04943385,0.008857804,0.0315973,0.061600734,0.002585929,0.00003523957,0.0000892482,0.00009481495,0.8457051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96225685,0.0010637532,0.002867161,0.0047370824,0.0007798246,0.000043182863,0.000023418454,0.0000695917,0.02815908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972621,0.0018324323,0.000064049025,0.00027930306,0.0003760764,0.00018598321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844474,0.0008427615,0.000107390355,0.00017214793,0.00030969494,0.00012335366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028701182,0.0003072213,0.0003760486,0.0012646664,0.004852289,0.0055369604,0.00058224757,0.0022173105,0.002611178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033897543,0.00030149522,0.00034778018,0.0005727327,0.033253867,0.0036660782,0.0021077422,0.0054001855,0.00048522407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004447722,0.0000031898066,0.000022357654,0.000005534852,9.925383e-7,0.000014626712,0.0016910735,0.000023592644,0.00004545979,0.99651355,0.0011584378,0.0005166994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011565684,0.000011211792,0.0002181735,0.00008472314,0.0000052073087,0.000050090162,0.001072094,0.0002794767,0.00021802979,0.8992625,0.098770484,0.000016440816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00682465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00712267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019269566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051678777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619014913","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1332946","title":"Critical Notice: James A Harris’ <i>Hume: an intellectual biography</i>, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Notice; Scholarship; Opposition (politics); Philosophy; Politics; Classics; Sociology; Epistemology; Art history; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.03594287324915052,"score_gpt":0.30276639797993304,"score_spread":0.2668235247307825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619014913","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041867013,0.007188945,0.00014127551,0.9707901,0.016929407,0.000009615917,0.000026114954,0.00001063413,0.0044851815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06334611,0.013629546,0.0007197598,0.813376,0.06438439,0.0001426946,0.000050861618,0.00011853989,0.044231974],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99084526,0.005669235,0.00033875703,0.00089359394,0.0016739874,0.0005791303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728857,0.01966096,0.0011939992,0.000805973,0.003862508,0.0015908357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010425985,0.0008069075,0.0010306967,0.0023287504,0.012097696,0.011939388,0.002308613,0.013704538,0.008673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04275917,0.00047702194,0.00044126427,0.0018447698,0.022775585,0.0132435635,0.0047758548,0.022013608,0.0020442116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073408155,0.000007518324,0.000054014563,0.000048290007,0.0000026060852,0.00007924671,0.0038564275,0.000019742383,0.000025818705,0.04666418,0.9469101,0.0023247122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000571284,0.0000059015933,0.00019349038,0.00041108628,0.000003352022,0.000100441146,0.0072565475,0.00009769977,0.00007679176,0.017470768,0.97435534,0.00002294977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018036624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019189075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018036624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011717092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010068501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08501387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735266767","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1341781","title":"Epistemic buck-passing and the interpersonal view of testimony","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"York University","keywords":"Testimonial; Epistemology; Reductionism; Philosophy; Interpersonal communication; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.07887050824485706,"score_gpt":0.26424391813652787,"score_spread":0.1853734098916708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735266767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075935155,0.002769299,0.13008356,0.058032762,0.0007296931,0.000111721005,0.00008285805,0.00015378011,0.7321012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98549277,0.00033069844,0.0060483273,0.0012891444,0.00020647563,0.00003253174,0.000013094877,0.000025101135,0.006561814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98226756,0.010759544,0.00067550916,0.0014924761,0.0036798427,0.0011250378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969249,0.02050692,0.0021512904,0.003458139,0.003427153,0.0012075232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013009887,0.00055564725,0.00069593283,0.0031476156,0.0075144926,0.009613855,0.0020996192,0.005412039,0.0060107936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03162753,0.0005667093,0.0008123005,0.0010557033,0.04293801,0.012857923,0.00851786,0.007933977,0.00063154224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007841289,0.000006537723,0.00009704131,0.000033805383,0.0000055208884,0.00011906874,0.003929475,0.00021876734,0.00006901877,0.9933351,0.0004517308,0.0017259754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007504918,0.000012040911,0.00013686816,0.00009182437,0.000014638236,0.0001367283,0.0016716114,0.00091264845,0.00030023782,0.9853527,0.011349604,0.000013630575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032911098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022812919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013009887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006194898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002656289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06880373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740630344","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1353880","title":"Justice in migration","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legitimacy; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Immigration; Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Balance (ability); Emigration; Global justice; Democratic legitimacy; Political economy; Law and economics; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Social science; Psychology","score_opus":0.060785434726125166,"score_gpt":0.33280473564376145,"score_spread":0.27201930091763626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740630344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058558606,0.01729137,0.01229491,0.27107754,0.0028088507,0.000106459585,0.00007337097,0.000038311675,0.6377506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662306,0.0034560421,0.0015152226,0.012997805,0.0007001469,0.000051881805,0.000017403536,0.000023079436,0.015007753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921177,0.0047013764,0.00025965765,0.00068499334,0.0010278923,0.0012084328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967637,0.0014168953,0.00031536014,0.00026021292,0.0006934665,0.00055039447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072496394,0.0003837638,0.00054514955,0.0012092469,0.011737253,0.007887495,0.0010047054,0.0048599094,0.0037490304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008844458,0.00013286824,0.00039942915,0.0011563986,0.05281269,0.005129464,0.0057162507,0.0055193915,0.00025369882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002660015,0.0000056402973,0.00016048057,0.000017351435,0.0000018470056,0.000036947935,0.004291834,0.00010369234,0.000021361931,0.9911753,0.0021036726,0.002079161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071405384,0.0000153211,0.00052043184,0.00020737409,0.0000049166374,0.00007165714,0.0088193305,0.0002027918,0.00005157491,0.9150155,0.07507225,0.000011748979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029444689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021329628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029444689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009825494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012041991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0712893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740894114","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1357993","title":"Fictionalism about musical works","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Musicology and Musical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Wollongong; Victoria University of Wellington; Australian National University; University of Victoria","keywords":"Musical; Naturalism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Analytic philosophy; Musical analysis; Contemporary philosophy; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.05369860264010964,"score_gpt":0.23894119857908463,"score_spread":0.185242595938975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740894114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045585874,0.0040025534,0.024965322,0.027648754,0.0005729569,0.00002518336,0.00007744447,0.000059077287,0.89706284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98384166,0.00069652556,0.002131543,0.0013282804,0.00038181033,0.00003306597,0.000049427363,0.000034234658,0.011503457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99552023,0.0022272344,0.000117280004,0.0006056688,0.0011910958,0.00033847956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555534,0.002587886,0.00034510723,0.00061164156,0.0006281235,0.0002718559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040105735,0.000386537,0.00042248957,0.0026657374,0.006882226,0.008662901,0.0014180972,0.003314985,0.0062099025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068956963,0.00021388591,0.00037895207,0.0014470726,0.07050801,0.00635271,0.005342534,0.0038406898,0.0006114685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001975207,0.0000015082203,0.000023114093,0.000007835719,6.592886e-7,0.000008244499,0.0018356643,0.000024558361,0.000018872444,0.99738175,0.00026155144,0.0004342397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008391575,0.0000052325468,0.0002049257,0.00006493873,0.0000037095115,0.00003955239,0.0023660182,0.0002237381,0.00009161778,0.94969624,0.047289636,0.0000059963186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003673982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031537095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008662901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063019274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015113825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045723855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762494388","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1386481","title":"Human rights without human supremacism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Declaration; Environmental ethics; Subjectivity; Embodied cognition; Hierarchy; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16397043137684764,"score_gpt":0.4922745909166849,"score_spread":0.32830415953983727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762494388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021360455,0.007392958,0.023166586,0.39693892,0.0035936474,0.00009136339,0.00008394032,0.000073700015,0.54729843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88003576,0.00262744,0.0055474336,0.07234783,0.0021721523,0.00013955926,0.000039361454,0.00003705457,0.037053496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.985989,0.00711691,0.000617532,0.002069962,0.0030126732,0.0011940008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857495,0.00808008,0.0012337524,0.0018402308,0.0019963824,0.0011000143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015472935,0.000415613,0.00076594495,0.00058183924,0.004238153,0.006571573,0.0014982617,0.010653084,0.0061287005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017515365,0.00026818734,0.00040187314,0.00038737454,0.058959775,0.0062631853,0.0057150824,0.010845533,0.0014242119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005140743,0.0000050612307,0.000059142818,0.000017613855,0.0000030981348,0.000039201932,0.001354939,0.00003984191,0.00008370675,0.9933876,0.0031969424,0.001807683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024012663,0.000043099597,0.0002509097,0.0002764427,0.000009964079,0.00018708636,0.0013091154,0.00025984255,0.00036570535,0.84648013,0.15076803,0.000025704254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004607339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002790238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015472935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003761166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073260474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08182967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777563286","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1414524","title":"Intention as action under development: why intention is not a mental state","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University at Buffalo; University of New England","keywords":"Action (physics); Tadpole (physics); Mental state; Psychology; Action theory (sociology); State (computer science); Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.11498616642278349,"score_gpt":0.293840096776608,"score_spread":0.17885393035382452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777563286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16123885,0.0030886119,0.2967902,0.04884706,0.0008338043,0.00013726913,0.00021130103,0.0003862514,0.4884667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790462,0.00036665014,0.014472551,0.0008497638,0.000050391973,0.00007238439,0.000056021174,0.000051868665,0.005034058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703515,0.0015538469,0.00012464292,0.00045469968,0.00053245603,0.00029921334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99361414,0.0032952304,0.00060267973,0.00073171034,0.0011927434,0.0005635012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047188997,0.0003238975,0.0004243303,0.0010590652,0.0012476305,0.004264592,0.0012006395,0.002613893,0.0040832735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009420177,0.00037433588,0.00080273044,0.00049658044,0.019933268,0.007729754,0.0022824937,0.0032675874,0.00066172075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000089165,0.0000065241966,0.00045422354,0.000026872678,0.000004821213,0.000055446257,0.0012677828,0.00034135528,0.00016185663,0.9950022,0.00041689843,0.0022531212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001585161,0.000026797557,0.00093736,0.000058488225,0.000011197528,0.00012109441,0.0007858279,0.003196318,0.00032589122,0.9861531,0.008345042,0.000022923265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004016324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018165057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047188997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025395136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020751029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024956226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789692057","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1415105","title":"Integration and authority: rescuing the ‘one thought too many’ problem","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Epistemology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Sociology","score_opus":0.09115655659884588,"score_gpt":0.2551344071805182,"score_spread":0.16397785058167236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789692057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078668475,0.004167119,0.15189534,0.1997473,0.002582522,0.00009120767,0.000041503303,0.00020800334,0.56259847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97747165,0.0004228522,0.0074875327,0.004536639,0.00062001176,0.00004718222,0.000011091969,0.000097243756,0.009305663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838869,0.010326144,0.00041199126,0.0012818787,0.002908913,0.0011841253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837443,0.009211206,0.0011384261,0.00271611,0.0020884846,0.0011014728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020112632,0.0005473468,0.0011044551,0.0017726598,0.007429016,0.00871632,0.0023437499,0.009131788,0.0059474795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03264153,0.00056752795,0.0008800149,0.0010609643,0.082768485,0.019999923,0.014426528,0.015122544,0.00081746647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006514272,0.0000044539966,0.000035730878,0.000006689379,0.0000018462807,0.00003190764,0.0015001764,0.000094185554,0.000026143238,0.99622107,0.0008359595,0.0012351288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011532305,0.0000062360973,0.000051163926,0.000039920636,0.0000038606067,0.000035238405,0.0006967114,0.00048488245,0.00008628649,0.98604983,0.012525538,0.000008740594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004093198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002654805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020112632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065201204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007087527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10636705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794797568","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2018.1445174","title":"Hylomorphism without forms? A critical notice of Simon Evnine’s <i>Making Objects and Events</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Semiotics and Representation Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"University of Victoria","keywords":"Theme (computing); Notice; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05030037909274339,"score_gpt":0.28774251438140136,"score_spread":0.23744213528865799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794797568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1039763,0.022849513,0.02033107,0.36609092,0.004032773,0.00005039447,0.00006107113,0.0001459846,0.48246193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742774,0.0021159984,0.0017878825,0.005985328,0.0004364769,0.000025383468,0.000012585816,0.00008208134,0.015276989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927105,0.0052095614,0.00014715081,0.00043685667,0.0010891674,0.00040684664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995552,0.0031427015,0.00030829245,0.00029093993,0.00043684593,0.00026915505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006515921,0.00054576463,0.00054016756,0.0013801175,0.008921657,0.007956995,0.0010609637,0.0036177593,0.0022673146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008167029,0.00033885328,0.00027869205,0.0013644327,0.046676237,0.009289812,0.005796841,0.0063991747,0.0003009803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015220207,0.000004295719,0.00006388397,0.00001880379,0.0000014346243,0.0001114,0.022075316,0.000083495,0.00008584067,0.9696137,0.005978987,0.0019476366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018819192,0.0000266472,0.00035564345,0.00026275523,0.00000771947,0.00045300994,0.037399065,0.0005870647,0.00071655633,0.562866,0.39727017,0.00003659419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008032664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012032668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008921657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008356182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031293866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060628653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800499407","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2018.1463798","title":"Children’s rights and the non-identity problem","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European Commission","keywords":"Identity (music); Identifiability; Disadvantaged; Complaint; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01621547588621094,"score_gpt":0.29316536310793995,"score_spread":0.27694988722172903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800499407","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081413336,0.004648614,0.05486146,0.52597576,0.0012118652,0.00010384952,0.000058166697,0.0000620522,0.33166486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637726,0.0014054463,0.0063564777,0.018636854,0.0006695555,0.0001051725,0.000014228555,0.000034405355,0.00900519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9724467,0.01755943,0.0010218319,0.002404831,0.0045231762,0.0020440076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94897383,0.040107295,0.0039356626,0.0032558811,0.0024199553,0.0013072545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03045436,0.00041041558,0.0008268231,0.0014001816,0.007400057,0.008177565,0.0029354724,0.015722353,0.006044373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038868885,0.00043396585,0.00094214187,0.00087357365,0.117266744,0.019812323,0.010532176,0.01789354,0.00052626635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032747673,0.0000054168377,0.00015195225,0.000010935189,0.000001982379,0.000100900776,0.00258584,0.000047523085,0.000022044273,0.99530494,0.0006310492,0.0011342367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019822333,0.00001421768,0.00027002822,0.000153331,0.0000093805675,0.0003951194,0.0044148737,0.0002670712,0.00019837682,0.9639621,0.030276768,0.000019064606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069734077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038796624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03045436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007217591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008612458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16105992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806181184","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2018.1472516","title":"What kind of evaluative states are emotions? The attitudinal theory vs. the perceptual theory of emotions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Perception; Dilemma; Psychology; Argument (complex analysis); Self-perception theory; Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Cognitive dissonance","score_opus":0.08401052726712095,"score_gpt":0.34444532903827285,"score_spread":0.2604348017711519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806181184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24383725,0.0051357597,0.08286619,0.051195577,0.0007580135,0.00007726996,0.00023486886,0.00012635377,0.6157687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941947,0.0006156541,0.0021063434,0.0009121471,0.00014664195,0.00002957818,0.000024155286,0.000014229347,0.001956569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830437,0.00093610125,0.000067788176,0.00021475328,0.00029155795,0.00018538632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960944,0.0018092943,0.0005226128,0.00040105823,0.0008191167,0.00035357082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027521031,0.00019505886,0.00032002814,0.0010105198,0.00079367735,0.0046692165,0.00043849513,0.0012615955,0.0043412093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068677287,0.00019264033,0.00037375465,0.00066466676,0.008986299,0.0058075185,0.0010971763,0.0015053786,0.00038119868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039957347,0.00003505121,0.0018364907,0.000076898694,0.000018077882,0.000044193417,0.002686624,0.0002262568,0.0006675455,0.981097,0.0012635125,0.012008269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021717184,0.00002878198,0.01007536,0.00011599548,0.000027615211,0.000101209924,0.0049525327,0.0016945779,0.00043737973,0.97056615,0.0119514195,0.00002715992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011066857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007755255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046692165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011411693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045410893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014554739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883514089","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2018.1492837","title":"Succeeding competently: towards an anti-luck condition for achievement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Epistemology; Psychology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.10222320331851563,"score_gpt":0.2989897489072842,"score_spread":0.19676654558876855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883514089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22651182,0.0009631041,0.09080229,0.035969403,0.0003841434,0.00021209253,0.00045195004,0.00033505645,0.64437014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99284005,0.0001293652,0.0041910987,0.0005286202,0.000088930225,0.00008160057,0.0000563918,0.00003761286,0.0020464126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917653,0.0032511686,0.0007533329,0.0014067555,0.0014302714,0.0013930866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754234,0.011778863,0.0032592325,0.0025407802,0.0040119346,0.0029858595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008277538,0.0003485448,0.0008840633,0.0015900036,0.002537815,0.0051756725,0.0012115118,0.0037899432,0.011937144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020215986,0.00046637436,0.0007101792,0.0006754771,0.024346052,0.007904509,0.0060164053,0.005137753,0.0016595846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030173802,0.000025213054,0.00082116737,0.00003847202,0.0000052158553,0.00015583857,0.0009022213,0.0002285723,0.00020836132,0.9961123,0.0004617622,0.0010107349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003510418,0.000046470108,0.002412781,0.00006415908,0.000008866911,0.00018746323,0.0014539264,0.0017945876,0.00047502117,0.9869561,0.006536371,0.000029133158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012332588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011487587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011937144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028261328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032841894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043776333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897409790","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2018.1521695","title":"Re-reading Anscombe on ‘I’","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reading (process); Philosophy; Term (time); Syntax; Linguistics; Point (geometry); Epistemology; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.05885916568179712,"score_gpt":0.32513531997949646,"score_spread":0.26627615429769935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897409790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013588469,0.0057181437,0.026104718,0.17197098,0.01308445,0.00005808573,0.00013970635,0.00020003576,0.7691354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66177726,0.0036056284,0.0126000475,0.05431272,0.005124152,0.00016130651,0.00015220039,0.0008501282,0.26141652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99353206,0.0033228663,0.00022000464,0.00090206973,0.0015040254,0.0005188843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927988,0.0031765494,0.00024917716,0.0009002039,0.0025364056,0.00033893986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005302257,0.00070526305,0.0007659591,0.0018021847,0.0072549223,0.008379133,0.0016996283,0.004627846,0.010191084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01647339,0.00044591288,0.00047102213,0.0011275751,0.028509306,0.010597733,0.0062503302,0.013148054,0.0026049602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001676196,0.000008243995,0.00011166774,0.00003702522,0.0000058850183,0.000114278155,0.023418153,0.000049129056,0.00018826949,0.9268997,0.044127308,0.005023621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060889365,0.000011591812,0.00030124834,0.0002721608,0.000008692851,0.00011982352,0.008133849,0.00022306532,0.00033063453,0.21844515,0.7721198,0.000027866297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0392867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05438735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0392867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008777498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032591608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07811606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962293539","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2019.1619354","title":"Is children’s wellbeing different from adults’ wellbeing?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; York University","funders":"European Research Council; York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Psychology; Well-being; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.01732302339000507,"score_gpt":0.20149303184762307,"score_spread":0.184170008457618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962293539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41476068,0.027265022,0.02313574,0.2936096,0.0011153659,0.00006483596,0.00068026275,0.00006949266,0.23929903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98901457,0.0036012605,0.0012517931,0.0037988564,0.00014593228,0.000024927196,0.00009324643,0.0000149338775,0.0020544748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775046,0.0010862584,0.0000939089,0.00047134724,0.00030420453,0.00029369481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99614006,0.0017789539,0.00069925655,0.0002957774,0.0006156863,0.0004702011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00429637,0.0003198479,0.00047368815,0.0010726219,0.0015601328,0.0035742077,0.0006163207,0.0016401277,0.0031003084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065980675,0.00015005817,0.00035363255,0.001049774,0.021388572,0.0058852714,0.0032028153,0.0039041762,0.00025122176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004362297,0.000020011345,0.012696141,0.00016796186,0.000045876153,0.00021975786,0.029100044,0.00027353741,0.0003209299,0.9340414,0.003769066,0.019301603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014694839,0.00006225324,0.037323892,0.0006091283,0.00005201066,0.00042560016,0.041322637,0.00033793133,0.00044176055,0.8247011,0.09465725,0.00005183596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009956638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008314265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009956638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033512579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001943259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024315178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981423145","doi":"10.1017/can.2019.11","title":"Publicity, reciprocity, and incentives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Incentive; Law and economics; Criticism; Economic Justice; Norm of reciprocity; Reciprocal; Political science; Economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Microeconomics; Psychology; Philosophy; Social capital","score_opus":0.04397690624457164,"score_gpt":0.2958030668376698,"score_spread":0.2518261605930982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981423145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08875178,0.0035468922,0.05810783,0.09013078,0.00047808944,0.000115123,0.00009172701,0.000072563904,0.75870526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869763,0.0007328267,0.0018439343,0.0014979505,0.00019374375,0.000052083942,0.000010469423,0.000013756758,0.008678879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907776,0.0058429427,0.00025110733,0.00083262636,0.0014719677,0.00082367583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837419,0.010591538,0.0016289132,0.0015723619,0.0017231968,0.00074214063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010799325,0.00025308592,0.00050012534,0.0011286369,0.0024802536,0.006648856,0.0007640142,0.0040503447,0.00714239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021101264,0.00026428545,0.00033538786,0.0008102039,0.019859623,0.006275921,0.003880849,0.0026766213,0.00057323487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043901587,0.000004631328,0.000087454275,0.000009814878,0.0000017679276,0.000008628719,0.00016863395,0.0001612516,0.000019856134,0.99790823,0.00038958393,0.0012357295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013109986,0.000012419425,0.0002232911,0.000041140134,0.000004498451,0.000024577732,0.00022883668,0.000432265,0.00006774735,0.98239625,0.016549753,0.000006073572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002005008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014009512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010799325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005199029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039013582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057112932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981484090","doi":"10.1017/can.2019.8","title":"Is Canada Entitled to the Arctic?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Situated; The arctic; Arctic; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Ecology","score_opus":0.024767227844905305,"score_gpt":0.2682169670677531,"score_spread":0.2434497392228478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981484090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10702459,0.008806928,0.0009655744,0.17020981,0.001289489,0.000028112094,0.0005825942,0.000025327692,0.7110676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9480275,0.00509672,0.00032439572,0.01937061,0.0002246174,0.000011969789,0.00012822944,0.000024105411,0.026791763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568164,0.0006011133,0.00007722759,0.00043757123,0.0012058982,0.0019964885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956754,0.0007970006,0.00026428938,0.000121583136,0.0019374874,0.0012042864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023815776,0.0001808773,0.00045570257,0.0011199975,0.021474905,0.009627249,0.0012751009,0.0031657338,0.009965366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006565546,0.00016925688,0.00029174893,0.0023881553,0.012655138,0.0022417596,0.002692381,0.0033447153,0.000540183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008748005,0.000017604802,0.008733181,0.00019051577,0.000040692634,0.00074517657,0.013755282,0.0004450977,0.00030173868,0.89783955,0.06004642,0.017797327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026817945,0.000022731503,0.026450662,0.0011956599,0.00009471875,0.0003036099,0.06900916,0.00052572397,0.00045331175,0.07960708,0.8221528,0.0001577509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97841555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9832314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05921684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05921684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11074946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42965025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982282514","doi":"10.1017/can.2019.3","title":"Moral Understanding and Cooperative Testimony","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Morality; Epistemology; Moral disengagement; Moral reasoning; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1488294891675281,"score_gpt":0.24871565293418713,"score_spread":0.09988616376665901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982282514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086808026,0.0063819867,0.16247126,0.08588094,0.0007792454,0.0001356227,0.00011655227,0.00013821691,0.6572882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98025435,0.0009948575,0.010252109,0.002336734,0.00019019403,0.00004379672,0.000033437937,0.000016642522,0.0058778552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782572,0.015204208,0.00069707655,0.0013136228,0.0035842136,0.00094369333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9637836,0.02552102,0.003282082,0.0024627917,0.0038015253,0.0011489092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019593216,0.00054608204,0.0007481998,0.0023813997,0.00425263,0.007424281,0.0015950135,0.0065841493,0.009078519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051581502,0.0004028376,0.00055132137,0.0009776889,0.029761575,0.009615858,0.010593564,0.0069987066,0.0006365254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010867778,0.000021799879,0.00014057414,0.00008714564,0.000010412361,0.00014442526,0.0062603387,0.0004603511,0.00020231577,0.9859286,0.0011950664,0.0055380175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013179236,0.000014784628,0.00032704472,0.0002454037,0.000012226964,0.00014660924,0.0027571884,0.0012868638,0.00030231726,0.97607327,0.018800935,0.000020211466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033714878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023021302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019593216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047711586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00385601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10362011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982651615","doi":"10.1017/can.2019.37","title":"What Is a Pain in a Body Part?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Reading; University of Oxford","keywords":"Qualia; Naturalism; Perception; Epistemology; Psychology; Sensation; Mind–body problem; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy of mind; Pain sensation; Physicalism; Philosophy; Direct and indirect realism; Cognitive science; Metaphysics; Consciousness; Medicine","score_opus":0.07271390465904777,"score_gpt":0.2590051727494752,"score_spread":0.18629126809042745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982651615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17805636,0.020876708,0.21301228,0.098632865,0.0077656084,0.00020751948,0.0011499382,0.00031891486,0.4799798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805524,0.0014813587,0.007863642,0.0035899568,0.0005536652,0.000038722883,0.00012441434,0.000050419414,0.005745289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982474,0.00084745156,0.00009891195,0.00034030457,0.00036713114,0.000098848766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701905,0.0015465902,0.00026217292,0.00018304611,0.0008388674,0.00015022825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002411636,0.0003039762,0.00035149071,0.00071053865,0.0014640486,0.0032823419,0.0006574221,0.0019190063,0.008076858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007223744,0.00019234869,0.00035582442,0.00061783096,0.010108196,0.0052349046,0.0015450713,0.0024420624,0.000852349],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016392977,0.000029523444,0.0013803475,0.0003636955,0.000031504846,0.00047820527,0.01395429,0.00023089579,0.00409119,0.95621693,0.0087587945,0.014300739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028310358,0.00013001371,0.0055146622,0.00055725727,0.000045547797,0.0008490298,0.013907432,0.0021045397,0.002601383,0.8986468,0.07553124,0.00008385123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020587298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011758411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008076858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001502855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006264428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02701974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989878489","doi":"10.1017/can.2019.41","title":"Platonic Laws of Nature","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Problem of universals; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Naturalism; Natural law","score_opus":0.010588698415726346,"score_gpt":0.2608628690152051,"score_spread":0.25027417059947876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989878489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016584782,0.013931738,0.03694889,0.17275809,0.0031455688,0.000060163096,0.0004145379,0.0002013472,0.7559549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8733513,0.0047000493,0.010412465,0.017779365,0.0021281634,0.00014582813,0.00021100971,0.00008951319,0.09118242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990802,0.00039335675,0.00003518491,0.00020800307,0.00022125599,0.00006199105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989452,0.0005089423,0.0000740304,0.00020000986,0.00019214206,0.00007959644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001496426,0.000283082,0.00027982547,0.00079540507,0.0017385912,0.0031043666,0.0004931272,0.0016737626,0.0058670407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031830266,0.00018397708,0.0002798879,0.00044699083,0.017368982,0.004164984,0.0014170719,0.0038066162,0.00088842644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024320345,0.000002037117,0.000028541672,0.000004843376,9.3486057e-7,0.0000043117625,0.00013690247,0.00010694735,0.000028511666,0.9946219,0.004049987,0.0010127566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029644489,0.0000025003237,0.00007644882,0.000014471943,9.035697e-7,0.000008752742,0.000044863533,0.0002655096,0.00003464297,0.96052426,0.039021894,0.0000028633456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00566234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037458853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058670407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004101682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013199628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029759884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995142335","doi":"10.1017/can.2019.43","title":"Achievement and Enhancement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of Oxford; Somerville College, University of Oxford; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Reading (process); Philosophy; Psychology; Positive economics; Linguistics; Economics; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.06854186054116775,"score_gpt":0.24859732501354878,"score_spread":0.18005546447238102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995142335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08933727,0.004592848,0.025627801,0.04717643,0.0007687327,0.00006861052,0.000035769473,0.000057456604,0.83233505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855735,0.00093276927,0.0024138202,0.0017673558,0.00016859925,0.000035705107,0.000009553957,0.000024101751,0.00907461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99460125,0.002898664,0.00015901655,0.00063904765,0.0009812962,0.00072084815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941003,0.0031341545,0.0006957114,0.00065847585,0.0008368843,0.0005743863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057898345,0.00052485743,0.00035528242,0.0013256271,0.0034294184,0.0063315886,0.0009651809,0.002257366,0.0033224502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007901354,0.00014586493,0.00038488657,0.00051067275,0.041384395,0.0072875116,0.0076430673,0.005510144,0.00034820088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011645131,0.000009608228,0.00032122544,0.000028139846,0.0000030611434,0.000043106862,0.0032696682,0.00006312324,0.00012822814,0.9918339,0.0005197286,0.0037684883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010723549,0.00007010668,0.0015946607,0.00012029688,0.0000106401385,0.00016700056,0.004909007,0.00029408824,0.0007386023,0.93872815,0.05334098,0.000015884802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010795874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010008557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063315886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032132128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019157341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03061992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996211725","doi":"10.1017/can.2019.45","title":"Unity in the Scientific Study of Intellectual Attention","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Epistemology; Psychology; Intellectual development; Task (project management); Cognition; Position (finance); Sociology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Management; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.20853470557874945,"score_gpt":0.34600865003832243,"score_spread":0.13747394445957298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996211725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13405855,0.028119832,0.28038627,0.16934882,0.0018606914,0.000118938224,0.00009265374,0.00027766966,0.3857366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865458,0.0014090817,0.008184599,0.0017054126,0.0004645794,0.000059924958,0.000009576305,0.00002380538,0.0015971534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98949385,0.006811699,0.00034631908,0.0012882963,0.0017038491,0.00035596863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96754783,0.024764866,0.0016801693,0.0038388735,0.0013748517,0.0007933345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015744356,0.0002763465,0.0007664662,0.002516835,0.0023396793,0.005833403,0.0016327072,0.0024530792,0.0026933122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032244433,0.00028703464,0.0004308644,0.001529331,0.057511702,0.0093366625,0.00755526,0.0046989587,0.00027994957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010285151,0.000010253811,0.00023656162,0.000051613246,0.0000067867722,0.000024358244,0.0033112098,0.00025823512,0.00011078003,0.9909135,0.0004922702,0.004574207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055307505,0.0000049746977,0.00014210484,0.000038651666,0.000002398821,0.00001310772,0.00032798565,0.0003243417,0.00006546677,0.9946713,0.004400801,0.0000032407982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015986459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084995606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015744356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003184083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033629155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083265126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999564241","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2000.10717535","title":"David Cummiskey, Kantian Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press1996. Pp. xiv + 192.<sup>1</sup>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Philosophy; General interest; Content (measure theory); Contemporary philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03695892807462151,"score_gpt":0.2668828796368124,"score_spread":0.2299239515621909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999564241","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003878367,0.94464487,0.0016726289,0.016384473,0.0024661126,0.000012241626,0.00046222156,0.00009622644,0.033873353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026817808,0.8787347,0.0044352035,0.0057345056,0.0067085116,0.00011435441,0.0009982205,0.0003294879,0.07612718],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988564,0.00035534587,0.0001408965,0.00017428106,0.00036221312,0.00011084298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711335,0.0017335659,0.0002670307,0.00018180483,0.00054409914,0.00016011081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020718765,0.0030585176,0.0018856226,0.007527815,0.0029218784,0.004516457,0.0022742243,0.0037579015,0.054232154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004813728,0.0019250015,0.0011183455,0.0082869455,0.006741716,0.013261983,0.001768957,0.0056102625,0.023644898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008480364,0.000033316104,0.00030678514,0.0011586442,0.000058002173,0.00012183411,0.001233957,0.000450325,0.00012615898,0.11012628,0.8049735,0.08132643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003277742,0.0000142061435,0.0022186323,0.001680313,0.00004148044,0.0002740144,0.0007419119,0.0001803704,0.00024740762,0.22819383,0.7663339,0.000041255298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02265189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050537366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054232154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006132291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003725779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18142462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000188277","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2000.10717546","title":"Andrew Kernohan Liberalism, Equality, and Cultural Oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1998. Pp. xiv-130.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Liberalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05078309165074317,"score_gpt":0.29332063120210333,"score_spread":0.24253753955136015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000188277","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008475141,0.8632369,0.0018089844,0.03242743,0.0017507322,0.000020111982,0.000400402,0.000103692786,0.09940427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08480917,0.6950616,0.005568011,0.010067075,0.0056096213,0.00026872798,0.0007149532,0.0003810143,0.19751972],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864596,0.00043200556,0.00012941369,0.00015246129,0.00046442536,0.00017573961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977591,0.001209996,0.00024069448,0.00017804217,0.00044155298,0.00017055689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019287806,0.0020192023,0.001563554,0.0040403334,0.0026842095,0.0047545405,0.0019146156,0.0032034758,0.025135046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043093897,0.0014310123,0.0005903325,0.004775934,0.009478033,0.010153542,0.0021087884,0.0041687894,0.008422111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055013323,0.00003481473,0.0005096634,0.0008522991,0.00004150533,0.00017522923,0.003165389,0.00039898447,0.0001476927,0.24341844,0.6521964,0.09900457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018892979,0.000008139272,0.0019045217,0.0014034,0.000022313103,0.0002116996,0.0018125414,0.00012144904,0.0001455941,0.27190006,0.72242504,0.000026377906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051086936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12066999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051086936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0091428915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005791259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10157913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001094624","doi":"10.1017/can.2019.53","title":"Plato on the Enslavement of Reason","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Ruler; Philosophy; Soul; The Republic; Epistemology; Element (criminal law); Form of the Good; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.09795017232740061,"score_gpt":0.20436842499630928,"score_spread":0.10641825266890867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001094624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042940665,0.0045327395,0.012244859,0.024678953,0.0008709622,0.00003277979,0.00006145835,0.00006881985,0.9145688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762872,0.00061712123,0.0014384477,0.003162009,0.00026005608,0.000041397692,0.000015561918,0.000031105366,0.0181472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968839,0.0017258676,0.000105235486,0.00033383418,0.0005246449,0.0004263948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868375,0.0007112994,0.00011646845,0.00021242314,0.00016768146,0.00010852089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028036546,0.00026592004,0.0003138701,0.00077642355,0.004354496,0.0035001708,0.00041188597,0.0016220425,0.0029394273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002417918,0.00021067685,0.00041541082,0.00047504032,0.04640527,0.0032971199,0.003163757,0.0061525716,0.00037607067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005020228,0.0000017713307,0.00003226839,0.0000036623735,6.632255e-7,0.000014374178,0.0017017397,0.000039694172,0.000030753825,0.99693274,0.00061051146,0.00062683027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010533455,0.000011815329,0.00020376788,0.000059577706,0.0000029800985,0.000036616028,0.0009980586,0.00024092023,0.00018430468,0.9093914,0.088849895,0.000010076449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005646225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043869014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005646225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00500032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033419428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036280036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001989153","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.32","title":"Learning to Appreciate the Gray Areas: A Critical Notice of Anil Gupta’s “Conscious Experience”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Embodied and Extended Cognition","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; CLARITY; Epistemology; Empiricism; Cognition; Philosophy of science; Foundation (evidence); Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Neuroscience; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.055777457652032285,"score_gpt":0.2759832533655061,"score_spread":0.22020579571347382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001989153","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042276364,0.020633979,0.052395806,0.7690038,0.005369827,0.00003619683,0.000054363896,0.00022435837,0.11000532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516502,0.003327341,0.0074512586,0.028447384,0.0021444918,0.000041329495,0.000012655903,0.00013289753,0.006792483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961868,0.0024940483,0.00008268079,0.0004022245,0.00063543697,0.00019882078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874007,0.0102427155,0.00042845344,0.0005506007,0.0009194338,0.0004580976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057714456,0.00038769358,0.00043056326,0.0009998817,0.0034775941,0.005120937,0.0011417326,0.0035223672,0.0020866394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014086417,0.0002662173,0.0002810918,0.00049036567,0.05466215,0.009968839,0.004241857,0.010711186,0.00041244272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023624081,0.000009481583,0.000069952934,0.000034382803,0.0000044135827,0.00018088518,0.012110622,0.00023771489,0.000249503,0.9619237,0.02068993,0.004465681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013809571,0.000015009788,0.00010524404,0.0000804262,0.0000043417413,0.000254996,0.0035492915,0.0005823019,0.0003026238,0.91378266,0.08128683,0.000022449438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021877154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022081388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057714456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037128825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002171557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030522645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020100236","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.9","title":"Credence: A Belief-First Approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.1280423749139143,"score_gpt":0.23477625197244703,"score_spread":0.10673387705853274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020100236","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024453918,0.0070427954,0.63559407,0.07251842,0.0011860679,0.00013757426,0.00024520306,0.00016996972,0.258652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9424463,0.001268671,0.045515798,0.0026826153,0.0010457841,0.00013020735,0.000057090223,0.00004766156,0.006805917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98646927,0.008162836,0.0003917053,0.0014916185,0.0027677596,0.0007167868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599577,0.029700743,0.0018858535,0.0033766152,0.0037201848,0.0013587816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01929554,0.00080334954,0.0014520129,0.0046079666,0.0036559294,0.009922777,0.0035629354,0.0059629763,0.00884518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037225727,0.00077251135,0.0014104525,0.0018038352,0.030356966,0.014898202,0.004228456,0.0093330415,0.0009583384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006206188,0.0000060188645,0.00006601103,0.000020171354,0.000007820176,0.000024632152,0.00021653247,0.00050792145,0.000017793656,0.9972742,0.00030010825,0.0015524937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052501277,0.0000048961597,0.00005273168,0.000028920269,0.0000041239823,0.000025193574,0.000049648163,0.0016647523,0.00003449325,0.9961261,0.001998139,0.000005827362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038249453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022325187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01929554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008287322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028750668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102045834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044690955","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.29","title":"How to Philosophically Tackle Kinds without Talking about “Natural Kinds”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Relevance (law); Natural (archaeology); Politics; Subject (documents); Subject matter; Race (biology); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.0443798572572404,"score_gpt":0.2844933370229579,"score_spread":0.24011347976571754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044690955","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020069068,0.00959195,0.47280848,0.3317246,0.0039364756,0.00027227087,0.00020412324,0.00026897824,0.16112395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69786656,0.005766619,0.2417047,0.03410664,0.0017853898,0.00093269633,0.00019422873,0.00032149864,0.017321682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834879,0.0114080375,0.00063582393,0.001383481,0.002367509,0.0007172334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826299,0.010230735,0.001252731,0.0023175161,0.0025404445,0.001028749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03302611,0.0009341411,0.001346656,0.0030197762,0.007024809,0.009164521,0.0031243716,0.0051494413,0.005145676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016239176,0.0006092396,0.0018584181,0.0016528921,0.07800379,0.019844927,0.00758279,0.010714289,0.0010566602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028358893,0.000004679329,0.00006290751,0.000040143022,0.000006352518,0.000013738107,0.0021390938,0.00008239147,0.000060937396,0.9950269,0.0010789157,0.0014811135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049058326,0.00000428058,0.00004661081,0.00007412749,0.0000043971195,0.000022410248,0.0011991952,0.00023430606,0.00006650489,0.9807608,0.01757506,0.000007391483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007218684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007926223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03302611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008590317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008345524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17466086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088070978","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.34","title":"The New Worries about Science","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13709182831084962,"score_gpt":0.4455617313530138,"score_spread":0.30846990304216415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088070978","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0098552,0.015584651,0.0023073126,0.9148884,0.0033843897,0.00001578702,0.00004133804,0.000019395047,0.05390353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7393645,0.020361537,0.0025449123,0.21374239,0.009854511,0.00009813676,0.00008100311,0.000087005654,0.013866075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9404755,0.03376513,0.0018025503,0.0043295273,0.017578833,0.0020484014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8729583,0.0956289,0.0041113407,0.007150216,0.016027832,0.0041233343],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.067189544,0.0005047996,0.0011401149,0.0031920339,0.012074716,0.017429112,0.0021513493,0.014228457,0.0056819995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09090422,0.000677415,0.00057967525,0.0025454622,0.13603821,0.025758645,0.00679937,0.02995443,0.0009689544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003778174,0.000018584105,0.000603104,0.0001804389,0.00001770474,0.00022932807,0.034373313,0.00015716594,0.00017096895,0.9110497,0.044468287,0.00869349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034355617,0.000025348096,0.0008496592,0.00076959096,0.000012840768,0.00028680058,0.02539786,0.0002989604,0.00017725033,0.70715094,0.26495093,0.00004544982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016481202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01145129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9879253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021107543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0138859935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35533655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3103312344","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.39","title":"Failures of Intention and Failed-Art","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Performative utterance; Aesthetics; Luck; Accidental; Focus (optics); Epistemology; Art; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.05893295163836881,"score_gpt":0.20868468609744248,"score_spread":0.14975173445907367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3103312344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5181729,0.001268068,0.06526393,0.012580413,0.00021122755,0.00009073805,0.000085581,0.00037204567,0.40195513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99675363,0.000059639948,0.0009448598,0.00012068437,0.000012348924,0.0000175178,0.000011344196,0.000035366582,0.0020445285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98609865,0.007229638,0.00064677873,0.00113527,0.0029783517,0.0019114376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966153,0.016705168,0.0039119083,0.007383467,0.003736236,0.0021101944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014743437,0.0006814344,0.0007746805,0.002141192,0.0049106595,0.008710614,0.0022830246,0.0038142966,0.006358061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031588674,0.0005395166,0.0007817783,0.0011809045,0.048804447,0.011972504,0.010068987,0.0058689155,0.0009522294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007994966,0.000052930307,0.0060064215,0.00008049216,0.000024526958,0.00050538714,0.027790885,0.0013798126,0.00040823335,0.95362294,0.0010890625,0.0089593455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037311926,0.000091700225,0.0064245667,0.00027089234,0.000028124712,0.0005571639,0.024539435,0.0066293455,0.0010585998,0.94029146,0.019985763,0.00008568237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029605338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017474305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014743437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037199482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002169673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07797164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112923268","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.45","title":"Understanding the Problem of “Hype”: Exaggeration, Values, and Trust in Science","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta; Montana State University","keywords":"Exaggeration; Epistemology; Variety (cybernetics); Context (archaeology); Journalism; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Media studies; History; Computer science; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.589016986892307,"score_gpt":0.390232543620996,"score_spread":0.19878444327131095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112923268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6236124,0.004826643,0.051671136,0.12320018,0.00039263777,0.000085818196,0.00008848698,0.00010176691,0.19602092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984629,0.000170468,0.0006657227,0.00045192448,0.000030673313,0.000007641019,0.0000044709473,0.0000065942295,0.00019945245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97809654,0.015082433,0.00068276824,0.0011543415,0.003834644,0.001149198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88739324,0.0796706,0.015343588,0.007340446,0.007887728,0.0023644967],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02325938,0.00040232544,0.0006888073,0.002863946,0.0056786546,0.013587781,0.0017219794,0.005792025,0.0034222652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.082197085,0.00061018247,0.00044260244,0.0021535289,0.0662039,0.020507075,0.009487999,0.007841126,0.00021389427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011388659,0.00006146634,0.008931721,0.0002150669,0.00005305748,0.00049216114,0.24435118,0.0007239919,0.0010450418,0.7270152,0.002060542,0.014936705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004003148,0.000061489074,0.010798568,0.00049927307,0.000047472226,0.00039856383,0.11184125,0.0045725713,0.00067879504,0.8541671,0.01678144,0.00011333272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010515314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058307108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99432135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008029742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036155703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12300885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127762900","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.55","title":"Locke on the Motivation to Suspend Desire","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Suspension (topology); Philosophy; Doctrine; Epistemology; Psychology; Theology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1157978964635336,"score_gpt":0.2156160191063443,"score_spread":0.09981812264281069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127762900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092029296,0.0018845715,0.067397356,0.05207412,0.0005261628,0.000106731735,0.000102300095,0.000114974675,0.7857645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98046434,0.0003075472,0.004689758,0.0030630843,0.00015859808,0.000098142205,0.000021827762,0.00005942048,0.011137299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99358153,0.0031893621,0.00023686537,0.0009901897,0.0011543847,0.00084773434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891894,0.006124626,0.0007994187,0.0012765978,0.0017055013,0.00090453064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006778638,0.00037149113,0.00063990674,0.0009921466,0.0036313136,0.005654273,0.0010149925,0.0041163787,0.006545141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015035919,0.0004951212,0.0008774118,0.00056728325,0.022879776,0.0066411127,0.004756249,0.0064337207,0.0008197106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010173438,0.000009690025,0.00017768079,0.000010485151,0.0000035455978,0.000046188066,0.00090053736,0.00008157473,0.00010600621,0.99701095,0.0006510338,0.000991976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023846007,0.00002083501,0.0004276498,0.000055623856,0.0000057841507,0.00008136802,0.0009857356,0.00072852214,0.00022479505,0.97811174,0.019314885,0.00001911578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018782333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018594372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006778638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035456123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002394316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035849333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132377382","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.51","title":"Excuses and Alternatives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; University of Oxford","keywords":"Excuse; Counterexample; Reading (process); Subject (documents); Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05183254116283461,"score_gpt":0.24315855296652003,"score_spread":0.19132601180368541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132377382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0372029,0.0032959753,0.08121522,0.045613974,0.001596497,0.00013153093,0.0002011908,0.00020733789,0.8305354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9274351,0.0011222567,0.024511753,0.0066937134,0.0008485,0.00025485046,0.00019842929,0.00021201477,0.03872338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843053,0.008985214,0.0007449298,0.0015457666,0.0036348542,0.00078387087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839325,0.01020159,0.0007858209,0.0020571619,0.0024395178,0.0005833586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008590374,0.0008594151,0.0008044787,0.0021585259,0.0044311644,0.004289114,0.0020883519,0.005911131,0.01617859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02687106,0.0004994846,0.00086869136,0.0010467527,0.027779633,0.012423633,0.0067454847,0.0070739263,0.0017928324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008777477,0.000005000726,0.000030231062,0.000014934922,0.0000015913439,0.00006939674,0.0005090007,0.00005150276,0.000041414703,0.9967614,0.0011503574,0.001356503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010909351,0.000006050419,0.000049751525,0.000064427906,0.0000033349597,0.00011464932,0.0005168963,0.00036109932,0.00011873567,0.9698618,0.028883718,0.000008657747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010654791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01617859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031976448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001612331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054122746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134338264","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.58","title":"Critical notice of <i>Words and Contents</i>, by Richard Vallée","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Linguistics and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Section (typography); Philosophy; Plan (archaeology); Linguistics; Epistemology; Computer science; History; Political science; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02894545141164851,"score_gpt":0.23068437681644702,"score_spread":0.2017389254047985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134338264","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034668099,0.035670467,0.006499385,0.8674414,0.034974657,0.000031385018,0.00007789067,0.00011572167,0.05172229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4459222,0.027738394,0.011185081,0.27793777,0.07480326,0.00023818793,0.0001472112,0.0009293075,0.16109857],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994852,0.002938675,0.00020202978,0.00069504825,0.001062056,0.00025020496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910251,0.0062087323,0.0003196131,0.00028265157,0.0018630355,0.00030090372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006245531,0.00061735394,0.00043545658,0.0013846022,0.0070277494,0.006771906,0.0012251287,0.0057069953,0.0032780594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022161452,0.0004480966,0.00029940932,0.00085896405,0.017563295,0.010302898,0.0025056184,0.012586567,0.0010759747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031799234,0.0000069503853,0.00008852847,0.000082338214,0.0000054844395,0.00019880504,0.0072888057,0.00010423803,0.00022318456,0.44658554,0.5385925,0.006791686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069243415,0.000009813788,0.00011663396,0.00023565449,0.000004882092,0.00012425878,0.0028763101,0.00017130908,0.00026590726,0.058862098,0.9373028,0.000023484805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017708052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014480064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017708052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008695648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047516064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063091636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175100152","doi":"10.1017/can.2021.8","title":"Group Agents and Moral Status: What Can We Owe to Organizations?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Zürich; University of Oxford; York University","keywords":"Gratitude; Collectivism; Individualism; Collective action; Action (physics); Social psychology; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.07136009597545154,"score_gpt":0.25179041115233675,"score_spread":0.1804303151768852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175100152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23904565,0.0061643953,0.024280487,0.16168861,0.0010575213,0.000090036745,0.000078705474,0.00004730868,0.56754726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948278,0.00040315694,0.0009520005,0.001246941,0.000104079416,0.00001895575,0.00001012352,0.000014145656,0.0024227141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830315,0.011665239,0.0003442368,0.0010211171,0.0025698843,0.0013679892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824179,0.007633665,0.0023119582,0.001544709,0.002779433,0.0033123714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015522437,0.0004034244,0.00072015176,0.0025658354,0.009702519,0.014283935,0.0017189246,0.005657684,0.0062332437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022941599,0.00029517233,0.00034773743,0.0016210544,0.067198545,0.012379883,0.005960128,0.004645077,0.0005424641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011032412,0.000025711619,0.00095803925,0.000029513878,0.000007386354,0.000027036745,0.008736417,0.000121538535,0.000038942977,0.985336,0.001233557,0.003474911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016526843,0.000024273526,0.0016878067,0.0001860407,0.000011779368,0.00003060264,0.012366012,0.00038894947,0.00006395863,0.96448296,0.020724054,0.000017008422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006807541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005762593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015522437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0089936275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005518394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08209145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175390287","doi":"10.1017/can.2021.15","title":"Sensational Science, Archaic Hominin Genetics, and Amplified Inductive Risk","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Davis; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Max-Planck-Institut für Menschheitsgeschichte; Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover; University of Alberta; Michigan State University; Florida Atlantic University; Eastern Michigan University; Universidad del Atlántico; University of Utah","keywords":"Entertainment; Phenomenon; Population; Ancient DNA; History of science; Genealogy; History; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Demography","score_opus":0.03965290888151631,"score_gpt":0.3016978452288648,"score_spread":0.2620449363473485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175390287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5677701,0.0027819525,0.044735122,0.062246025,0.0002521779,0.000043332955,0.00012718482,0.00008286767,0.32196113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981731,0.00013769256,0.0007059163,0.00024152249,0.000024611669,0.0000037348382,0.000003483085,0.0000022346874,0.0007076365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983134,0.0008577791,0.0000426903,0.00019383024,0.00044200313,0.00015024736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942888,0.0035722111,0.000848827,0.00045936124,0.00046359762,0.0003672686],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003531638,0.0001546135,0.00021510154,0.0014324589,0.0018715932,0.0026978706,0.00071800034,0.0013384542,0.004158129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0088251205,0.00012979125,0.00013434199,0.0008637655,0.03626891,0.0022285583,0.0031714689,0.0021485414,0.00011924374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022062402,0.00001439387,0.0042654383,0.000024637844,0.000007605347,0.00025967133,0.01251216,0.00028909429,0.00044966693,0.97677565,0.000687135,0.0046923715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008173207,0.000018523948,0.007511478,0.00003894113,0.00000821383,0.0005260875,0.009152149,0.0007211159,0.00038394245,0.96944594,0.012161175,0.000024296798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003764591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00407669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029905217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088842394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021697879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W378956657","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2001.10717576","title":"Semantic Pragmatism and A Priori Knawledge (or ‘Yes we could all be brains in a vat’)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Externalism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Skepticism; Metaphysics; Criticism; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Realism; Internalism and externalism; Proposition; Law","score_opus":0.06221565134566944,"score_gpt":0.3220105297861765,"score_spread":0.2597948784405071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W378956657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.114255436,0.0066726115,0.22477901,0.12915008,0.0012659053,0.00008060989,0.00026046412,0.00037858298,0.5231573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731724,0.00065326755,0.0134648895,0.0040912125,0.00028432815,0.0000605051,0.00006599561,0.000050791903,0.008156652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638474,0.0018178524,0.00017325478,0.0007739408,0.0006049242,0.00024520323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99506325,0.0027291472,0.0005428233,0.0008988801,0.0005957126,0.00017016048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005218321,0.00039122137,0.00043909997,0.0010043838,0.0023279185,0.0041069444,0.0011656465,0.003436108,0.004404115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011145894,0.00033376878,0.000634279,0.00083863485,0.027641498,0.011111021,0.004211005,0.004242572,0.00083652785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007070227,0.000003205975,0.00006349202,0.000015423648,0.0000040128575,0.000032884018,0.00096501416,0.00006668244,0.00005695433,0.99611974,0.0009163888,0.0017492374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041179155,0.0000028141878,0.00008074842,0.000009207097,0.000001670845,0.000039727594,0.00017372418,0.00019247622,0.00007747701,0.99502784,0.004386265,0.000003843488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001510661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015567747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005218321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002715542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014423494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027597487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W385662602","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2001.10717578","title":"Pleasure, Displeasure, and Representation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Object (grammar); Philosophy of mind; Pain and pleasure; Epistemology; Representation (politics); Philosophy; Skepticism; Neglect; Direct and indirect realism; Psychology; Metaphysics; Realism; Law; Neuroscience; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.17044100637088122,"score_gpt":0.287598708631086,"score_spread":0.11715770226020478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W385662602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073072806,0.024391875,0.11069968,0.04835659,0.0009011165,0.00005362721,0.000104563405,0.00014472734,0.74227506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818911,0.002643722,0.004472715,0.0012981353,0.00031033278,0.000037854614,0.00002765222,0.000049818016,0.009268679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620146,0.0017307479,0.0001428087,0.00050498825,0.0008616049,0.00055834546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757653,0.0011355673,0.00026253823,0.0004773398,0.00030286633,0.00024511077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031911964,0.0005292403,0.00059032126,0.0014702029,0.003831346,0.010326296,0.0014232668,0.0030216188,0.005179698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060503692,0.00028298216,0.00080623693,0.0014398017,0.05872292,0.015489266,0.0072729276,0.005495502,0.0005054807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007787269,0.0000035408814,0.0000853066,0.000020189183,0.0000033077624,0.00002194305,0.0025870537,0.00008037947,0.00007227474,0.9938007,0.00036910048,0.002948517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067894857,0.000012350483,0.00025422504,0.00003692892,0.000003932137,0.00009720849,0.001331529,0.00027766643,0.00009778916,0.98286015,0.0150112,0.000010358556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003113654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017996604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010326296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004305653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017557497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031239808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214612385","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2010.0008","title":"From the Editorial Office","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Science and Climate Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Operations research; Editorial board; Variety (cybernetics); Public relations; Library science; Business; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.011648574809973984,"score_gpt":0.2147547730234939,"score_spread":0.20310619821351994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214612385","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024561165,0.011013662,0.0011903135,0.06078479,0.78693503,0.00037022715,0.0010045407,0.0015682887,0.13688752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020811902,0.010892081,0.0012865373,0.03498422,0.3671908,0.00028379392,0.0012840147,0.0012795847,0.58071774],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990756,0.0009903094,0.0011956639,0.0011985952,0.005268683,0.00059071963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9386175,0.0044151256,0.003494196,0.0031657289,0.040944032,0.009363332],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00582508,0.002707053,0.0017731418,0.0036459211,0.0033022654,0.015017998,0.002486351,0.0048999763,0.43843746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046544354,0.00088842644,0.0012205598,0.0021356174,0.0013793383,0.0061008027,0.0034497313,0.0076819384,0.50845057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009167629,0.000006497543,0.000025215417,0.00009804502,0.000002290159,0.000030610037,0.0000106073985,0.0000053832428,0.000058963808,0.0002559059,0.98169667,0.017800638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075863363,0.000009998486,0.00007800829,0.00012597808,0.0000029392047,0.000080460515,0.000019881805,0.0000142748395,0.000042830914,0.00035706657,0.9992545,0.000006395285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079347275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013002849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43843746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021565906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059943004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80100083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229458455","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.19","title":"The Future Is Not What It Used to Be: Longevity and the Curmudgeonly Attitude to Change","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Mind wandering and attention","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"University of Galway; National University of Ireland","keywords":"Boredom; Alienation; Cognitive dissonance; Social psychology; Autonomy; Aesthetics; Longevity; Psychology; Worry; Dismissal; Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Gerontology; Medicine","score_opus":0.10031856436685907,"score_gpt":0.28619609470602214,"score_spread":0.18587753033916307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229458455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5063762,0.01980227,0.018865028,0.14288424,0.0016924135,0.000026553815,0.00002801191,0.00007130024,0.31025404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935309,0.0009802519,0.0004807435,0.0020152344,0.000112782625,0.000007533523,0.0000036015138,0.000008191909,0.0028608623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973838,0.0018221219,0.00006234091,0.0002106206,0.00031213617,0.00020906486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682826,0.0017043313,0.00045656075,0.00026633896,0.0002983296,0.00044606702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004157655,0.00022115941,0.00021572511,0.000787881,0.0033016924,0.004689495,0.00054432347,0.0021086782,0.001233574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059531736,0.00012289692,0.0001680987,0.00038223906,0.03522717,0.005445498,0.0042977897,0.0027249996,0.00013217854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033356308,0.00002560763,0.0015462477,0.00005047159,0.000007274797,0.00048461414,0.12541625,0.00011361969,0.00045319888,0.8581301,0.0037488996,0.009990427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019860056,0.00009053179,0.0048481636,0.0003158897,0.000016134934,0.0013091766,0.07234836,0.0005946607,0.0006771584,0.7453118,0.17440794,0.00006041361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002997149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029745616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004689495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030877332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011401571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022403121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229500299","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100022657","title":"CAN volume 41 issue 3 Cover and Back matter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.04249162278955527,"score_gpt":0.19096647569124908,"score_spread":0.14847485290169382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229500299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003442347,0.0038972306,0.0002608682,0.010055467,0.01587996,0.00008085398,0.0024081965,0.00039487545,0.9666782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010163188,0.0012141254,0.00008087356,0.0009226116,0.0009085274,0.000011423108,0.0006914699,0.000115692565,0.99503905],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850583,0.00007597128,0.00004824154,0.00020631963,0.0009421508,0.00022153131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967873,0.00025441693,0.00007911991,0.0003335081,0.0018221283,0.00072355574],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090583175,0.0008279876,0.0009863911,0.0028991438,0.004168425,0.010287734,0.0013287815,0.004075149,0.77405703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004364068,0.00048144106,0.00065196905,0.0041932785,0.0015028514,0.0033335246,0.0022508963,0.0027714965,0.62811506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015868849,0.000015160439,0.000080842845,0.0000822305,0.0000021553979,0.000027464397,0.000022285572,0.000029023266,0.00009596746,0.0031216808,0.97436553,0.022141792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020279467,0.000002257984,0.00019684574,0.00004840987,9.48425e-7,0.000011416251,0.000026327345,0.000019383264,0.00003697028,0.00039352916,0.99925977,0.0000022201934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06286683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13133802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22594297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008350478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013985506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32228017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231568693","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100023043","title":"CAN volume 40 issue 1 Cover and Back matter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Power Systems and Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Contemporary philosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Engineering; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.008963889727628948,"score_gpt":0.1885549037043163,"score_spread":0.17959101397668734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231568693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039380105,0.0023694527,0.00017969857,0.008491728,0.016281238,0.000085367756,0.0014618381,0.00042913103,0.9703077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00091647956,0.0007071659,0.00005819543,0.00086097297,0.0006880382,0.000012884277,0.0003700681,0.00013319861,0.996253],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998836,0.0000688032,0.000026656087,0.000119947654,0.0007219958,0.0002265722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979265,0.00016153546,0.00006025056,0.00020753176,0.0010811834,0.0005631295],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000664202,0.0009305497,0.0010042915,0.0025201163,0.0048728343,0.009828732,0.0011729777,0.0038275786,0.8093416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035959748,0.0005156737,0.0006697292,0.0030325702,0.0013831082,0.003319262,0.0025765796,0.002485209,0.63657975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015360527,0.00001107265,0.000046027624,0.00005749926,9.159929e-7,0.000018529974,0.000019764393,0.000014987681,0.00007531024,0.0012859771,0.9867112,0.011743315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027633255,0.000003473945,0.00021366279,0.000049040053,8.0467595e-7,0.000012729541,0.00004965916,0.000025004772,0.00003407661,0.00027631118,0.99933016,0.0000022892739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08726807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21886311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19065839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006803844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009347409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27195108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231590544","doi":"10.1017/s004550910002186x","title":"CAN volume 31 issue 2 Cover and Back matter","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; Florida State University","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.032461292396928666,"score_gpt":0.19606742798248153,"score_spread":0.16360613558555287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231590544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003812484,0.0034305407,0.00024125267,0.009153061,0.017313268,0.00011140085,0.0028001326,0.00044816264,0.96612096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009615451,0.000920045,0.000064560496,0.0007249576,0.00071636675,0.000013109034,0.0006593042,0.000107007974,0.9958331],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841917,0.000076140794,0.000046435707,0.00015214956,0.0010788613,0.0002273335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967307,0.00021983485,0.00006939864,0.00035074976,0.0018769046,0.0007525249],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009680446,0.0008033851,0.001018369,0.0033671805,0.0044320943,0.009767545,0.0013664146,0.0031301067,0.77900535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004537447,0.00046603466,0.00061018625,0.0044814805,0.0014198398,0.0030379405,0.0021026295,0.0024137225,0.6275704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012431692,0.00001049932,0.000058330857,0.00006103834,0.0000013211079,0.000021567626,0.000026491873,0.000021209045,0.000068081834,0.002271847,0.98255575,0.014891373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024715118,0.0000022523275,0.000247992,0.00004221675,9.278429e-7,0.000009921458,0.000039883693,0.000020466208,0.000027814192,0.00046701904,0.99913675,0.00000232678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.101550095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20109533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22099465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009310611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012833224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31522202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233691394","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100024656","title":"CAN volume 34 issue 1 Cover and Back matter","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.02999347217121624,"score_gpt":0.1930283399488878,"score_spread":0.16303486777767157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233691394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042940615,0.003951224,0.0002670982,0.0088022845,0.016614227,0.00011797311,0.003110553,0.00054734474,0.9661599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00096914114,0.0009865842,0.00007659832,0.000679971,0.0006799373,0.000012704663,0.0006621409,0.00011354968,0.99581933],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983399,0.00008029646,0.000048042042,0.00016212999,0.0011249797,0.0002445348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677247,0.00019799906,0.000070550544,0.00032005645,0.0018705404,0.0007683381],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009599961,0.0008252469,0.0010677304,0.0038269402,0.004441149,0.009331195,0.0015170339,0.0029014316,0.7905557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004401667,0.00047951427,0.00065174757,0.0045663654,0.0013966165,0.0029155032,0.0022114022,0.0022521794,0.63578457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012433385,0.000011603908,0.00006595872,0.00006494492,0.0000015715748,0.000021455648,0.000026532192,0.000021965418,0.000081781975,0.0022384578,0.98052514,0.016928233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023068578,0.000002318012,0.0002678251,0.000041330935,0.0000011277411,0.000010305425,0.000040009643,0.00002013963,0.0000328341,0.00047957807,0.99909973,0.0000024722433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11129838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21290174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20944428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010128021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0138821425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29874682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235321937","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100026291","title":"CAN volume 32 issue 3 Cover and Back matter","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Engineering; Physics; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.03653130062689046,"score_gpt":0.18847588152853434,"score_spread":0.15194458090164387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235321937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003907209,0.0031588133,0.0002461985,0.00808303,0.015500663,0.00010872172,0.0027127925,0.00052009197,0.96927905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009595075,0.00078854745,0.0000654331,0.00070903916,0.0006169832,0.000011784108,0.00057742,0.00010993633,0.99616134],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984535,0.000072477655,0.000043884647,0.00015221981,0.0010568063,0.00022101433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967919,0.000186426,0.00006028425,0.0003388395,0.0018866861,0.0007358371],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009243878,0.0007891238,0.000997283,0.003137145,0.0042217094,0.009312969,0.0013707099,0.0029656966,0.7766313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041528484,0.00044908182,0.0006082649,0.0041269325,0.001347658,0.002754414,0.0019964904,0.002283331,0.63559365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012644341,0.000011047559,0.000058708436,0.000055407476,0.000001377502,0.000022039298,0.000025537303,0.000020681568,0.000078457626,0.0021185004,0.9828703,0.014725362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025245167,0.000002269792,0.00025859202,0.000039111914,9.858949e-7,0.000010497845,0.000040463947,0.000022776494,0.00003227683,0.00045489048,0.9991333,0.0000024119704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11393535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22310455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7766313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009013228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012695371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31860834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237328850","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100002460","title":"CAN volume 30 issue 2 Cover and Front matter","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Nuclear and radioactivity studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Calgary; Western University; University of Lethbridge; University of Alberta; Université de Montréal; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Environmental science; Engineering; Geography; Physics; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Mathematics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.006437983995110926,"score_gpt":0.1750743921724565,"score_spread":0.16863640817734557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237328850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00054926163,0.0009982724,0.00025126032,0.0049035414,0.006276799,0.000055343575,0.00060659193,0.0006049247,0.985754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016244629,0.0005240871,0.00014093629,0.0010878838,0.00081159454,0.000013455927,0.0003478182,0.00013824135,0.9953117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993536,0.0000390279,0.000015798742,0.000100840625,0.00039604353,0.00009468692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887985,0.00010100567,0.000023320448,0.00018046745,0.0004431616,0.00037211512],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065326714,0.00086462224,0.0007174597,0.001806981,0.0026708357,0.0053546242,0.00088703976,0.0036092042,0.83299875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018724815,0.0004088495,0.0006655656,0.0011989943,0.001092943,0.0023214654,0.001986908,0.0018525725,0.7430573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003842249,0.000049131966,0.00014299163,0.00007969887,0.000003080051,0.000063929576,0.00003933752,0.000026408625,0.00049360027,0.0037329113,0.9613035,0.034027096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005730441,0.000009201489,0.00036000577,0.00004104881,0.0000018781304,0.00003980857,0.00004090395,0.000032532294,0.00012542993,0.0007903855,0.99855,0.000003014479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059336284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015864624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83299875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020714279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002165486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23820692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239421796","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100024619","title":"CAN volume 42 issue 1 Cover and Back matter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Environmental Policies and Emissions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Content (measure theory); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Engineering; Physics; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.01176712414881379,"score_gpt":0.2080193852515099,"score_spread":0.1962522611026961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239421796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027810351,0.0017965795,0.00016456407,0.00930294,0.021590125,0.000093727605,0.002059647,0.0004134888,0.9643008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00079317205,0.00050966936,0.00005547924,0.001153311,0.0007411885,0.000015132072,0.0005404908,0.00016262586,0.996029],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983524,0.00007872237,0.000038785536,0.00013998906,0.0011110319,0.0002790897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677724,0.00022829686,0.00007913979,0.00030273074,0.0019629512,0.0006495924],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093020394,0.00081767334,0.001023626,0.0024510918,0.0052257697,0.0112835895,0.0013154855,0.004103944,0.7828676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056547956,0.00049939915,0.00070932053,0.0032936085,0.0014710244,0.0036537761,0.002288352,0.0030367782,0.6683781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000091217735,0.000007937215,0.000029586248,0.000047805668,6.571637e-7,0.000010707604,0.00001628881,0.000011846892,0.00005005502,0.0012983067,0.9903555,0.008162181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023409025,0.0000021485096,0.00015848149,0.000042313164,6.68784e-7,0.00000717861,0.000039448594,0.000015762329,0.000025474663,0.00028637936,0.9994179,0.000002027123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12088254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2526468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21713239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008109007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012698395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30971295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239932915","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100022141","title":"CAN volume 33 issue 3 Cover and Back matter","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.03076383622145451,"score_gpt":0.19150278763375783,"score_spread":0.16073895141230332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239932915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039443377,0.003265063,0.00026935522,0.008054227,0.014920804,0.0001121672,0.0030213431,0.0005563328,0.9694063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010924473,0.00095716555,0.00008040951,0.00074752,0.00066579523,0.000013689675,0.0006459623,0.00013150457,0.9956656],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985831,0.00006437296,0.00004053174,0.00013786647,0.0009687019,0.00020543416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702924,0.00017429337,0.000060033974,0.00031048077,0.0017331808,0.00069287705],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009107687,0.0007497197,0.0010153203,0.0030831792,0.0041877963,0.009014906,0.0013654656,0.0027745597,0.769576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039424547,0.00042570152,0.00063713995,0.004266188,0.0013495923,0.0026085603,0.0019951197,0.0022746518,0.6232319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012077882,0.000010343902,0.000059159287,0.00005600341,0.0000013649909,0.000022303826,0.000026379566,0.000020038644,0.000078461264,0.0021210744,0.9825776,0.015015159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024584692,0.0000021639562,0.00027117698,0.00004118117,0.0000010488426,0.000011320828,0.000042057283,0.000022832763,0.000035694815,0.00051982864,0.9990478,0.000002433846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12648459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23427866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23042399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009755091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013794839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3286718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240393498","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100026230","title":"CAN volume 32 issue 2 Cover and Back matter","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Volume (thermodynamics); Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.035891981539634056,"score_gpt":0.18832176743637577,"score_spread":0.15242978589674172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240393498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040419569,0.0033115293,0.0002435509,0.008188141,0.01605576,0.00011233388,0.002693483,0.0005106451,0.96848035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009816996,0.00080152263,0.00006644282,0.00071499223,0.00063815166,0.00001220493,0.00059105956,0.000108223925,0.99608576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983866,0.00007672764,0.000045928027,0.00016062638,0.0010988355,0.00023121953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967423,0.00019141198,0.00006186788,0.0003436316,0.0019097774,0.0007509113],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009461138,0.0008044718,0.0010036344,0.0032683269,0.0042000515,0.009482224,0.001363841,0.003025658,0.773732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004223911,0.00046092435,0.0006046204,0.004117636,0.001346397,0.0028020393,0.0020188726,0.0022630426,0.6263185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013383004,0.000011770902,0.000061339306,0.000058657108,0.000001462137,0.000023243882,0.000026699507,0.000021844831,0.00008293162,0.002203798,0.9819781,0.015516781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026032294,0.0000023525936,0.00026485225,0.000038780847,9.916257e-7,0.000010609062,0.000039987626,0.000022450798,0.00003205105,0.00044148165,0.99914134,0.0000024495598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10947784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21577245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.773732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008960416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012695119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32274377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241112203","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100024486","title":"CAN volume 37 issue 2 Cover and Back matter","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.033526990621685474,"score_gpt":0.2030208314599253,"score_spread":0.16949384083823982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241112203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003478129,0.003597067,0.00023787144,0.008820033,0.017008536,0.00010849704,0.0032786042,0.0004631077,0.9661384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001066036,0.0011285424,0.00008570452,0.0009597075,0.00090367283,0.000016311258,0.0008207874,0.00014802908,0.99487114],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807715,0.000087713495,0.000051212235,0.00017374795,0.0013356314,0.0002745425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965564,0.00022662691,0.00006740824,0.00034639926,0.0020423091,0.0007609116],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010958287,0.00080019794,0.0011038287,0.0038298664,0.00450859,0.010469383,0.0014591536,0.0030434828,0.7615464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004604818,0.0004692175,0.0006342433,0.0045866934,0.0016185782,0.0029220893,0.0022553178,0.0026171783,0.624362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009617564,0.000009320854,0.000052778945,0.00005660335,0.000001389266,0.000017032662,0.000027050353,0.000019157113,0.00006698047,0.0028827346,0.9833249,0.013532467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020832163,0.0000018930458,0.00022781028,0.00004360854,9.596628e-7,0.0000085433785,0.00004004474,0.00001900907,0.000029025567,0.00049896195,0.9991258,0.0000023535576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13079083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24384609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7615464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011224243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017275395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34012514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242955219","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100024334","title":"CAN volume 35 issue 3 Cover and Back matter","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.029596344074373393,"score_gpt":0.19413693603641635,"score_spread":0.16454059196204296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242955219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042033763,0.0039646057,0.0002699585,0.008351571,0.017217638,0.00011051384,0.0030846596,0.00052472594,0.966056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011737219,0.0010354732,0.00008363142,0.00081775367,0.0007161084,0.000012256131,0.0006878219,0.000119770215,0.99535346],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839944,0.00007133367,0.000047027428,0.00015464498,0.001098599,0.00022908488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997013,0.00017616147,0.000060348648,0.00030347653,0.0017079609,0.00073906843],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009908275,0.0007881506,0.0010254635,0.0034833201,0.0044100527,0.009686166,0.0013694819,0.002777489,0.77137434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041920897,0.00042927294,0.00064166065,0.004236042,0.0014343379,0.0027805336,0.0021314896,0.0022884281,0.599118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011091565,0.000010301795,0.000062510866,0.00006062894,0.0000015227497,0.000020467995,0.000029934978,0.000020471276,0.0000729549,0.0025832402,0.98124206,0.015884807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020676543,0.0000020782188,0.0002602319,0.00004250868,0.0000010504107,0.000009253806,0.000043613923,0.000019479978,0.000029722065,0.000459518,0.99912816,0.0000023335688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13993016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25122702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22862566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010553746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015541336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32610673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245128375","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2011.0003","title":"Gappy Propositions?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Section (typography); Exposition (narrative); Sentence; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.06847731268393327,"score_gpt":0.2709999338536907,"score_spread":0.20252262116975744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245128375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04884046,0.008389874,0.20331927,0.08125019,0.002059096,0.00010129901,0.00038174546,0.00046315062,0.655195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9419957,0.001651054,0.0193253,0.012082348,0.00072360126,0.00018419804,0.00015308785,0.00018516585,0.023699602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965772,0.0015759766,0.00013510627,0.0007622385,0.0006199988,0.00032948118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975508,0.0012950319,0.00023776693,0.0004094707,0.0003341594,0.00017283914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047894814,0.00056590076,0.0007128987,0.0014354577,0.003319942,0.0053855637,0.0013300279,0.0026183473,0.009175282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008701525,0.00043921362,0.0006569383,0.0012101809,0.016688177,0.011487555,0.0053936257,0.0054659974,0.0013752334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005133268,0.0000010792575,0.000030080371,0.000008731925,0.0000014258064,0.000010465497,0.0002781225,0.00002033964,0.000016994794,0.99809223,0.0006319784,0.0009034467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055787027,0.0000062104546,0.00007064194,0.000022556156,0.0000031163036,0.000031758867,0.00024062608,0.00022599792,0.00011320309,0.9839469,0.015329588,0.0000037575815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014270616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013179102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009175282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039456165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001746688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030694366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247515881","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100030149","title":"CAN volume 44 issue 2 Cover and Back matter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.028293930523698423,"score_gpt":0.1907583410158243,"score_spread":0.1624644104921259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247515881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037366548,0.00079560926,0.00033175293,0.0043719267,0.013032404,0.00010413903,0.002852566,0.0012918928,0.9768461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010332421,0.0003622997,0.00012752993,0.0008864327,0.001009828,0.000020836802,0.000992006,0.0003905597,0.99517727],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895895,0.00007442238,0.0000371329,0.00014728637,0.00064049463,0.00014179676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977543,0.00024271161,0.00005757725,0.00038979025,0.001056022,0.0004997094],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092754455,0.00092204,0.0009653498,0.0023177809,0.0025420939,0.008153572,0.0011358518,0.0030656953,0.90283513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046796096,0.00042214536,0.0007641988,0.001804596,0.000952077,0.0031584003,0.0023154423,0.0022790462,0.8663737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016164755,0.000019293338,0.000054068547,0.000054425618,0.0000015904744,0.000023979712,0.0000139561025,0.000019068746,0.00012760494,0.0012802517,0.9812406,0.017149046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048550414,0.00000655584,0.00025364844,0.00004746857,0.0000013681909,0.000021871003,0.000027768667,0.000028979981,0.00009498301,0.0005295863,0.99897987,0.0000029644211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005952824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011043075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09716487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002290235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027657659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1385938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247823707","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100023948","title":"CAN volume 36 issue 1 Cover and Back matter","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.026643667141713668,"score_gpt":0.1883025008905841,"score_spread":0.1616588337488704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247823707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004056892,0.0044422974,0.0002718136,0.009321051,0.01877445,0.00012207373,0.0034578852,0.00052855763,0.96267617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010020616,0.0011757922,0.000086304724,0.00076134095,0.00082728534,0.000013044289,0.0007335572,0.00012936341,0.99527127],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981635,0.000089549736,0.000056718392,0.00018008161,0.0012553338,0.00025473296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965469,0.0002268293,0.00008104649,0.00036434195,0.0019568226,0.00082407275],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010985505,0.00085491233,0.0011398835,0.003663122,0.0044330996,0.010005004,0.001489072,0.0030788702,0.78467065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004858671,0.00048380476,0.0006530636,0.004637486,0.0014444112,0.003111677,0.00227046,0.0024540727,0.64387184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012597921,0.000011384259,0.000060891773,0.000070391325,0.0000014373322,0.00002053541,0.000028348812,0.000021503978,0.000079141355,0.0024330607,0.98003274,0.017227843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020916175,0.0000022563124,0.0002409178,0.00004455031,9.1918236e-7,0.00001048477,0.00003645865,0.000018364075,0.000029080984,0.00044672395,0.9991659,0.0000023196096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.099298276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19856974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21532935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009547785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014444994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30714113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249841639","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.977379","title":"Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Mathematics","score_opus":0.014917465035556927,"score_gpt":0.24651034640750996,"score_spread":0.23159288137195302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249841639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033516723,0.0046663275,0.010516624,0.022285474,0.007565012,0.00046573556,0.014505677,0.001772566,0.9348709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024527268,0.004548788,0.0061209984,0.006497519,0.002110283,0.00034232906,0.010534252,0.0006046186,0.944714],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879754,0.00014351851,0.000055878467,0.00034219935,0.0005073545,0.00015358851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854064,0.00017290852,0.00007704063,0.00016008208,0.0007452305,0.0003040288],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012317542,0.00086980534,0.00042815495,0.0014194888,0.001939929,0.0050123744,0.0017093404,0.0025232658,0.4516039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037332133,0.00031472437,0.00059461396,0.0013972697,0.0010287385,0.0025464005,0.00222251,0.002087561,0.27413923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009901057,0.00007859084,0.0011108328,0.0004617811,0.0000082805,0.00019361253,0.0008885179,0.00021693317,0.00080155313,0.083994485,0.74181175,0.17033468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035440532,0.000012825573,0.00054699124,0.00013424605,0.0000021265423,0.00006917166,0.00015791297,0.00003407251,0.0001152367,0.0044382815,0.9944794,0.000006114763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007841519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069937347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4516039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029352852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035902422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7822205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250824208","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100022621","title":"CAN volume 42 issue 2 Cover and Back matter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Metallurgy and Material Science","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Computer science; Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.02010060559444933,"score_gpt":0.22947365343202886,"score_spread":0.20937304783757954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250824208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000417415,0.003246551,0.00019414765,0.015817773,0.016918082,0.000059541246,0.0013751168,0.00035000744,0.9616215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010963914,0.00084978424,0.000056560853,0.001353736,0.0008951519,0.00000908208,0.00035089487,0.0000864114,0.99530184],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985434,0.00006842595,0.00003807468,0.00015729558,0.00095853745,0.00023427361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978496,0.00015691263,0.00005774239,0.00025126443,0.0011064528,0.000578006],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008858703,0.00075100607,0.0008135189,0.0025568595,0.0055622733,0.011988319,0.001364154,0.00546644,0.74772185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043774955,0.00045111708,0.00058725884,0.00361433,0.0018007914,0.0042918073,0.0025638773,0.003092978,0.53749907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011584295,0.000013152802,0.00007325879,0.00006573498,0.0000014928951,0.000028985647,0.00003520487,0.000015199064,0.00009232824,0.0043468815,0.97874737,0.01656884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018606912,0.0000020184382,0.00016150293,0.00003444786,7.590685e-7,0.000010099172,0.000044124874,0.000014417364,0.000027344404,0.0004543962,0.9992473,0.0000016678205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.077999406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19220938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25227815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084588025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015511511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35984415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252932439","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100026485","title":"CAN volume 40 issue 2 Cover and Back matter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.02679026419039927,"score_gpt":0.19275265872460243,"score_spread":0.16596239453420317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252932439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000359079,0.0037435147,0.00022386476,0.009742547,0.015270504,0.00007650918,0.002442932,0.00037083565,0.96777034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010236127,0.0011294737,0.000075127165,0.00095613685,0.00081416464,0.000010594098,0.00067058596,0.00010842305,0.9952118],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985084,0.00007028023,0.00004460727,0.00020009655,0.0009549846,0.00022161029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706227,0.00022299046,0.00007393942,0.00028217147,0.0016589335,0.0006996807],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009139904,0.0008827696,0.0009409286,0.0029716978,0.0037980368,0.00953528,0.0013419924,0.0040017962,0.7524485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004293423,0.00047924678,0.00062555145,0.004019062,0.0014958576,0.0033285476,0.002166134,0.0026833173,0.6053087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016038884,0.000014997123,0.000081489234,0.000073363015,0.0000019480751,0.000027330614,0.000020962783,0.00002823432,0.00010030692,0.0031708484,0.9756801,0.020784281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023595135,0.0000024128892,0.00021170038,0.00004407771,9.3744575e-7,0.0000115598095,0.000026343987,0.000022390179,0.000039232702,0.00044979315,0.99918693,0.0000023039393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08151653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16412029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2475515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009172226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015603602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35310215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253080523","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0020","title":"From the Editorial Office","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Science and Climate Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Operations research; Computer science; Business; Library science; Public relations; Political science; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.023692931485808335,"score_gpt":0.21253601642909983,"score_spread":0.1888430849432915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253080523","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036166253,0.011180025,0.001396428,0.063617654,0.64548975,0.0005031798,0.0015000742,0.0022280822,0.27372316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002271552,0.008486224,0.0010153697,0.02286577,0.2095552,0.00023431359,0.0011275642,0.0011948359,0.7532492],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938114,0.0006155888,0.00063658383,0.0008165577,0.0036715392,0.00044835676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9640147,0.0024420407,0.002088338,0.001787685,0.023390763,0.0062765707],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038886135,0.0021641694,0.0013428401,0.0031925754,0.0028265642,0.011292976,0.0019614021,0.003920724,0.5276637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032006983,0.0007008711,0.00088562974,0.0016093449,0.001128431,0.0054655853,0.002974754,0.005495098,0.55095345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008214777,0.000005851368,0.000021121501,0.0000783003,0.0000014524883,0.000026369114,0.000010210546,0.0000044970143,0.00006968863,0.00027084476,0.98056924,0.018934214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056065546,0.000007393703,0.00006744301,0.00009841945,0.0000018168486,0.00006246269,0.000019835927,0.000011329343,0.000046471927,0.0003229466,0.9993513,0.0000049751347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009470657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018898722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5276637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019029323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005063026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6737304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253502685","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100024243","title":"CAN volume 38 issue 2 Cover and Back matter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.033684993458355586,"score_gpt":0.19030826058742356,"score_spread":0.156623267129068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253502685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036662957,0.0028142692,0.00022443634,0.007888539,0.015612099,0.00011215253,0.00311386,0.0005136815,0.96935433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009089224,0.0007745567,0.00007365469,0.0007542219,0.00064827455,0.000014664108,0.0006752757,0.000120899094,0.9960295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982551,0.00007664068,0.0000491254,0.0001723899,0.0011981087,0.00024867954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99673426,0.00020397059,0.000063808984,0.00034248998,0.0019373795,0.00071816746],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010079291,0.00078636245,0.0010515879,0.0034113633,0.0039697294,0.008908896,0.0014587311,0.0030176162,0.7946574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046423217,0.00046199717,0.0006234305,0.0038640057,0.0014073673,0.0028227658,0.0022366948,0.0024330833,0.6665944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011125824,0.000009678976,0.000055795368,0.000055451095,0.0000013367787,0.000018835113,0.000023269555,0.00001947761,0.00007041964,0.0021527226,0.9826203,0.014961514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022625775,0.0000020726534,0.00023181026,0.000038321406,8.866475e-7,0.000008994844,0.000033767636,0.000019325564,0.000027306878,0.0004277048,0.9992054,0.0000022487711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11082805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21101734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20534259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009776173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014098786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29289627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253557469","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100022827","title":"CAN volume 42 issue 3-4 Cover and Back matter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Environmental Policies and Emissions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.011543233962696383,"score_gpt":0.20783927555558518,"score_spread":0.1962960415928888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253557469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020267908,0.0011189729,0.00015567442,0.005554784,0.014763642,0.0000458834,0.0016051518,0.000404043,0.97614914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010618906,0.00055767014,0.00007450671,0.001481885,0.0018238904,0.000019782135,0.00083134376,0.00025735243,0.9938916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894994,0.00008211167,0.000036960686,0.00016678219,0.00060033926,0.00016394081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771655,0.00025319943,0.0000646053,0.0004190232,0.0010197146,0.00052689976],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008054467,0.0009611813,0.0010278784,0.0027611535,0.0032482583,0.01050917,0.0013015412,0.004448447,0.85848105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004752226,0.00041193858,0.00076477317,0.0031154407,0.0011694267,0.0050018383,0.002869877,0.0035047424,0.81894195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016911546,0.000016779364,0.00005180508,0.000059060378,0.00000138595,0.000021153028,0.000016332875,0.000019089748,0.000082218576,0.0024909268,0.9788014,0.018422978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032079547,0.000004443842,0.00017095587,0.000054335334,9.4663955e-7,0.000012643848,0.000030188745,0.00002184484,0.000040929437,0.0008087838,0.9988493,0.0000022507843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006599281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01187321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14151895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029662917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026668415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20185953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255721375","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100025662","title":"CAN volume 38 issue 4 Cover and Back matter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.03456822291147634,"score_gpt":0.19080848965993089,"score_spread":0.15624026674845454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255721375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035845023,0.002593948,0.00021464565,0.007829415,0.01423777,0.0001073235,0.003014304,0.00049110304,0.971153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008840825,0.00073193235,0.000071715804,0.00071230216,0.0005900067,0.000013821717,0.00064003037,0.00011556789,0.9962406],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982712,0.00007611383,0.000048566082,0.00016740325,0.0011874954,0.00024920187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967152,0.00020089814,0.00006368157,0.00034642703,0.0019444975,0.00072931586],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010171366,0.000786978,0.0010453281,0.0034032674,0.004124536,0.008849993,0.0014861029,0.00301279,0.79912275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046947813,0.0004660777,0.00062901236,0.0039013675,0.0014635071,0.0028320907,0.0022856265,0.0024780182,0.6738549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010944503,0.000009668175,0.000058170208,0.00005445727,0.0000013452528,0.000018903283,0.000024095996,0.000019431804,0.00006921554,0.0022954417,0.98273486,0.01470333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022128138,0.0000020646748,0.00023436254,0.000037800146,9.000194e-7,0.000008802666,0.00003584574,0.000019368055,0.000027665226,0.00045381268,0.9991749,0.0000022642912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.119554125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22376247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79912275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010300573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014961352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28652704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285336876","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.5","title":"In Memoriam: Kai Nielsen","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Mathematics","score_opus":0.03731360911303395,"score_gpt":0.2892232971140069,"score_spread":0.25190968800097296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285336876","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008001687,0.006736692,0.0002044422,0.4806141,0.5097633,0.000010826038,0.0001597354,0.000060150483,0.0023706849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006576583,0.009698638,0.000710875,0.45172426,0.39838395,0.00008895227,0.00021829928,0.00028993082,0.1323085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467176,0.0007210808,0.00047472,0.0011440888,0.0025752573,0.0004130272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9717827,0.0061560776,0.0012832723,0.0007407527,0.0166735,0.0033637083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054012695,0.0015663317,0.0030636834,0.0021364195,0.005950914,0.009441055,0.0030404471,0.010348483,0.024356145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05476182,0.00070651906,0.001328615,0.0011287642,0.0043334416,0.008166369,0.0049295975,0.025290912,0.020102687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000108153845,0.0000031095715,0.0000326407,0.000022805818,0.0000055897763,0.00004372814,0.000068364985,0.000008812271,0.000012028818,0.0008612948,0.99748635,0.0014443292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010985847,0.000007038106,0.0002067022,0.00015704709,0.00001759004,0.00013901411,0.0004237302,0.000073537376,0.000071722585,0.0018143122,0.9970505,0.000027763632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02679601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045691837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02679601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007939376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0086604515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08147949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312125916","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.42","title":"Mental Imagery and the Epistemology of Testimony","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Testimonial; Externalism; Appeal; Epistemology; Internalism and externalism; Mental image; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognition; Law","score_opus":0.04555395362339027,"score_gpt":0.22928907143700436,"score_spread":0.1837351178136141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312125916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29474124,0.0058423798,0.13393283,0.061731823,0.0006540538,0.00013067995,0.0001620766,0.00013183207,0.50267303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99460936,0.0003584604,0.0035487227,0.0003856879,0.00007742405,0.000020183983,0.00001880834,0.000012293061,0.00096909504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886645,0.0084235985,0.00043240815,0.00065561046,0.0012762528,0.0005475156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96628165,0.025930947,0.0025745216,0.002336687,0.0021019827,0.00077418564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008911725,0.00035411667,0.0003978727,0.0031147138,0.0043873577,0.0070575173,0.0015886206,0.0029855515,0.0045553287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0343417,0.0004346216,0.00038892752,0.0013395508,0.06263731,0.009539798,0.006925833,0.004194583,0.000305755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024493502,0.00002310248,0.00071476673,0.00013374165,0.000009681931,0.0002494787,0.041932188,0.00029628957,0.00030290367,0.94976074,0.0007267799,0.005825859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028727087,0.000021469186,0.0012002889,0.0003567778,0.000011737988,0.00051929435,0.02289064,0.0018187765,0.0006563156,0.9580456,0.014421659,0.000028711172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036458464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022228782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008911725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039295815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002402389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047130287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312843654","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.33","title":"Humanizing Science and Philosophy of Science: George Sarton, Contextualist Philosophies of Science, and the Indigenous/Science Project","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; American Association for the Advancement of Science","keywords":"Science studies; George (robot); Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Art history; History","score_opus":0.06660842288416799,"score_gpt":0.3180924875899514,"score_spread":0.25148406470578344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312843654","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04268629,0.06957498,0.007718612,0.7533591,0.0015276921,0.00004933021,0.000039329923,0.00004326201,0.12500139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92567843,0.02631897,0.00722758,0.027386384,0.0010453444,0.00010142947,0.000015503487,0.000057189125,0.01216914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929294,0.005600597,0.00009142077,0.00041400664,0.00070308475,0.00026158403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893064,0.008530476,0.0003780231,0.00041793694,0.0006196794,0.0007475916],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012046031,0.0004244976,0.00053806225,0.0021441162,0.0136915585,0.007973125,0.0013874195,0.004645456,0.0019799005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059856107,0.00034108604,0.0002370451,0.0022738231,0.09931624,0.010369263,0.0053016134,0.008705523,0.00020974706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000716544,0.000019138368,0.00015746374,0.00005487155,0.0000038496455,0.000060445054,0.03574715,0.00020890319,0.00004153829,0.9529153,0.00796013,0.002824066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013366789,0.000017700182,0.00036102466,0.00043547098,0.00000690564,0.000086243774,0.031258747,0.00045879118,0.00013550308,0.80565035,0.16155504,0.000020838415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035889216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045298964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98630846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014077637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012646919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102140844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312978531","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.37","title":"Engaging with Science, Values, and Society: Introduction","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Contemporary philosophy; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02056637495489308,"score_gpt":0.25827185234995415,"score_spread":0.23770547739506107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312978531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015129324,0.18414707,0.02562488,0.24461152,0.041382294,0.0002811096,0.00095808425,0.00024679056,0.48761892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35659334,0.23530883,0.019122621,0.10317347,0.0394487,0.0010803662,0.0012010831,0.0007662032,0.24330537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986235,0.00062037254,0.000046157,0.0002264199,0.00027986817,0.00020367175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977824,0.001344252,0.00007189991,0.000101010424,0.00037127972,0.00032930032],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002295957,0.0012137601,0.00079173595,0.0017820454,0.0045179306,0.010515061,0.001051103,0.004440628,0.017934697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002483649,0.00034789165,0.00054866093,0.0022711956,0.014153445,0.008876497,0.0059884763,0.006612019,0.0022122809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003772012,0.000086349966,0.0008636507,0.0008730224,0.000011642434,0.00021183027,0.04026969,0.00035304122,0.0006827995,0.76087546,0.13850465,0.057230078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004092681,0.000030858093,0.00078915287,0.0009607218,0.000003691686,0.0001270583,0.013203257,0.000105951614,0.00010637086,0.09741551,0.88723683,0.000016451138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010416986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010940856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006555362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004644292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05999756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319924539","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.47","title":"Acting on Behalf of Another","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; University of Toronto; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Normative; Representation (politics); Phrase; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.05881144750015435,"score_gpt":0.30120136883030185,"score_spread":0.2423899213301475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319924539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03629561,0.0005362978,0.019986922,0.021577911,0.00062808074,0.000057018766,0.000026626929,0.000054897515,0.9208365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9583549,0.00028030062,0.002536374,0.0027557297,0.00020130425,0.000044267428,0.000025896152,0.00006332078,0.035737816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98037124,0.012569835,0.00047226265,0.0013573118,0.0037028273,0.0015266336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906873,0.0032238448,0.00073300157,0.001566259,0.0027367696,0.0010528148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009641011,0.00037401752,0.0004600403,0.0010980295,0.0047827153,0.0065179495,0.0012835524,0.0036179947,0.006033045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01171849,0.00022230927,0.00041429442,0.00063847785,0.023875458,0.007124949,0.004685154,0.004274771,0.00116745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059905337,0.000008178225,0.00016857547,0.000011497916,0.0000032067985,0.000040701183,0.0066170166,0.000055273897,0.00016601103,0.98877734,0.0021025022,0.0020438728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001831601,0.000041447194,0.0010666719,0.00029397497,0.000028668292,0.000260448,0.016212083,0.0012556169,0.0011986867,0.6384972,0.3410761,0.000050712668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054724216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047003706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009641011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003764294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046580182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050987124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322631638","doi":"10.1017/can.2023.3","title":"Reason in Kant’s Theory of Cognition","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Transcendental number; Epistemology; Dialectic; Philosophy; Transcendental philosophy; Articulation (sociology); Normative; Extant taxon; Argument (complex analysis); Categorical imperative; Transcendental idealism; Morality","score_opus":0.05402437146103098,"score_gpt":0.22072132059148758,"score_spread":0.1666969491304566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322631638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039320577,0.0133995395,0.20746371,0.045517422,0.0011146318,0.000072842646,0.00024820233,0.00024443213,0.6926186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454909,0.002027288,0.03193994,0.0024642346,0.00047987595,0.00010633784,0.00009444886,0.00007912492,0.01731792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955728,0.0025503251,0.00014116983,0.0004561625,0.0009869685,0.00029259358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971322,0.0017807096,0.00015173448,0.00040218962,0.00037727132,0.00015578851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00518957,0.0005411668,0.0007453795,0.0024444622,0.0023592948,0.0063279835,0.0012763136,0.0032067862,0.002922249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00455774,0.00038260198,0.0010062141,0.0012914255,0.03236026,0.0061209616,0.0028630118,0.004315864,0.0005891324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031146178,0.0000018856733,0.000018177745,0.000009720979,0.000002041413,0.000007868341,0.00031234286,0.00026463286,0.00001460946,0.9983394,0.0003038884,0.00072225445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034866987,0.0000019654528,0.000032980017,0.00001446145,0.0000016928179,0.000009113158,0.00007052666,0.00029094677,0.00002436548,0.99408567,0.005461688,0.000003068702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029002815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022990631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063279835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060503515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029805326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043898582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323912230","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.36","title":"Indifference to Anti-Humean Chances","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Pittsburgh; York University; University of Michigan","keywords":"Deference; Principle of sufficient reason; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08500891616053127,"score_gpt":0.24697262138926027,"score_spread":0.161963705228729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323912230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22700214,0.002501273,0.24308062,0.03286691,0.0007519942,0.0001329402,0.00015013314,0.0001792236,0.49333477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850038,0.00019302491,0.0069673015,0.001877961,0.00019573301,0.000043286895,0.00001511039,0.00002234168,0.0056814635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836007,0.0071776216,0.00062417344,0.0024320802,0.0049699275,0.0011954844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96028113,0.023911983,0.00242321,0.0049778707,0.0062061776,0.002199578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016295888,0.00042820373,0.000919307,0.0016743229,0.0030684597,0.005208592,0.0019230548,0.00396828,0.006972704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058181036,0.00048442083,0.000688039,0.0008422578,0.021527473,0.0078109982,0.0053840973,0.006346365,0.0008039231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049928964,0.000016112095,0.00053734676,0.000031680593,0.000014151424,0.0000716465,0.0007526653,0.0007773566,0.00022242527,0.99150276,0.00067005074,0.005353933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001989491,0.000022562272,0.00043140023,0.000027274511,0.000007906135,0.0000923309,0.00023541995,0.0018670573,0.0002754184,0.99177223,0.005234068,0.000014367874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020494557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014357934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016295888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039766645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018893102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08618194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362471104","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.46","title":"The Problem of Hard and Easy Problems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","keywords":"Phenomenon; Consciousness; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.04299688540851725,"score_gpt":0.1857080538215043,"score_spread":0.14271116841298703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362471104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08330427,0.010292817,0.29213396,0.24523605,0.0036892013,0.0003175208,0.00060440844,0.0006170415,0.36380467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9377915,0.0013853639,0.04108712,0.008944065,0.001875284,0.00028693487,0.00021501827,0.00023184012,0.008182796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779407,0.012986037,0.0012309438,0.0023206845,0.004635041,0.0008865108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9436974,0.03830299,0.0028178634,0.006570011,0.0065347,0.002077036],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019723635,0.0009917761,0.0015362222,0.0045556314,0.0052577364,0.009076515,0.0032700747,0.004577665,0.008952678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057110526,0.0005004262,0.0011953749,0.0015186057,0.053602114,0.020198984,0.008237426,0.011807433,0.001150579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026786756,0.000014092144,0.0003074069,0.0000565565,0.000007634384,0.00002400419,0.0005461588,0.00020643717,0.00006137318,0.9883819,0.0031362649,0.0072312034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009203681,0.0000060418815,0.00011169006,0.000047414112,0.0000026111932,0.000025941032,0.0003981697,0.00044401083,0.00007933739,0.99446326,0.0044048894,0.0000073776628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024698183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014917055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004296215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029515799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1043098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387024138","doi":"10.1017/can.2023.26","title":"Clearing up Clouds: Underspecification in Demonstrative Communication","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Toronto Scarborough; University College Dublin","keywords":"Underspecification; Demonstrative; Assertion; Linguistics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Computer science; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.08128888291980375,"score_gpt":0.32191495406613224,"score_spread":0.2406260711463285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387024138","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30630782,0.0013879472,0.38285092,0.021858485,0.00042269166,0.00018208746,0.00022975345,0.0008406545,0.2859196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882555,0.00011839627,0.007792283,0.0005337294,0.00005640067,0.000032641612,0.000047400503,0.00011048435,0.0030532002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856763,0.008660229,0.00068731303,0.0014794642,0.0024288918,0.0010678608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771492,0.014319961,0.001953059,0.0041797585,0.002028456,0.0003695312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010765665,0.0007006246,0.0007941043,0.0011797149,0.0047464115,0.0056490875,0.0021494338,0.004763758,0.009657265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0326616,0.0007711481,0.0006916048,0.0011642483,0.018968478,0.021082377,0.010655973,0.0053491765,0.0010812335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007833681,0.0000167249,0.0010679609,0.0001162649,0.00001546246,0.0010547996,0.053959113,0.0005787035,0.0022418266,0.9274134,0.0014856091,0.011971841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040161907,0.00007105774,0.0018180453,0.0003324109,0.00005903187,0.0022914007,0.034629177,0.008177245,0.0072573298,0.8713454,0.073855564,0.00012305715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040135896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022565802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010765665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032758617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019079119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056935012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388569367","doi":"10.1017/can.2023.30","title":"Natural Kinds: The Expendables","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cegep Edouard Montpetit; Université Laval; Université de Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université de Sherbrooke; Université Laval","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Natural kind; Realism; Philosophy; Scientific realism; Philosophy of science; Natural science; Aesthetics; History","score_opus":0.057839912628985704,"score_gpt":0.21566337112230907,"score_spread":0.15782345849332335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388569367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17739928,0.0037364794,0.3257674,0.05905371,0.00061262475,0.00008065332,0.0004540019,0.00038770935,0.43250814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814767,0.00046569743,0.011153376,0.0009185811,0.00016426358,0.00004311906,0.000073537245,0.00008243748,0.0056221983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939774,0.0027608203,0.0003029452,0.00082510005,0.0017010412,0.00043264238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98283017,0.009115586,0.0012180351,0.0042263414,0.0018803921,0.00072954013],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00801806,0.00049221143,0.0005705128,0.0023731117,0.0025243955,0.0062729036,0.0013968339,0.0027411985,0.0063274703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018617785,0.0006001899,0.0008830699,0.001053999,0.026388094,0.014876272,0.0059360866,0.004985372,0.00056993915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063107987,0.0000022302793,0.00010281485,0.000008968855,0.0000033766964,0.000012580168,0.00017277742,0.00017147814,0.00006521115,0.99830127,0.00021373143,0.0009391457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004522346,0.0000033069377,0.00012104556,0.000016605563,0.000005548816,0.00002005611,0.000116335454,0.00051587174,0.00008556876,0.9948832,0.004224051,0.0000039060533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021763956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021293913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003788955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015777511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042404056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389397857","doi":"10.1017/can.2023.36","title":"On the Practical Significance of Irrelevant Factors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Scarborough; University of Toronto","keywords":"Worry; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Gray (unit); Subject (documents); Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.1705623482703091,"score_gpt":0.2948098967463087,"score_spread":0.12424754847599959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389397857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1609943,0.0039584353,0.24407955,0.14022939,0.0011608647,0.00021702622,0.00010508844,0.0002990438,0.44895634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98224545,0.00060825393,0.008790343,0.0029835133,0.00022887532,0.000054249027,0.00001726977,0.00006493582,0.005007074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9761939,0.015315203,0.00063057686,0.0022404061,0.0040826285,0.0015372197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90465283,0.07674604,0.0033618992,0.007823202,0.005693759,0.0017221986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024393203,0.00083391694,0.0010455413,0.0017779379,0.005675096,0.007690336,0.002201509,0.005235006,0.007160537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08012619,0.00058570487,0.0007385422,0.0009306113,0.05803583,0.012155177,0.008581302,0.009330534,0.0007050081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042098778,0.000021636666,0.00057586434,0.00005921138,0.000013559185,0.00036425274,0.0036808387,0.0008088024,0.00023846627,0.9869436,0.0016046271,0.0056469627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009910621,0.000010454553,0.00016710846,0.000068552465,0.000014660224,0.000069436384,0.0013452068,0.0009855366,0.00032227128,0.9884312,0.008562892,0.000012691275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043381494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003797375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024393203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054735197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004447989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12900513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396616221","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.8","title":"Fear within the Frames: Horror Comics and Moral Danger","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Comics and Graphic Narratives","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Comics; Aesthetics; Contemporary philosophy; Philosophy; General interest; Art; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Literature; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05067188155447039,"score_gpt":0.22463498704582324,"score_spread":0.17396310549135285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396616221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32105374,0.0039187474,0.0057313577,0.041314192,0.0006152483,0.00003579329,0.00003867425,0.000034203484,0.62725806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944273,0.00044163078,0.00018036671,0.00081952586,0.00007139035,0.0000052700493,0.0000042983365,0.000009830222,0.0040403483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771047,0.0014485491,0.000036842725,0.00012619555,0.00038541664,0.00029239498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959941,0.0023462514,0.0006835731,0.00019692695,0.00042569195,0.00035346896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026540577,0.00041176548,0.0002138794,0.001391572,0.0060187643,0.008974535,0.000624074,0.0026448774,0.0069101704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069998666,0.00019798873,0.00020982068,0.0007692948,0.04556997,0.0055569215,0.0052808854,0.0036821247,0.00029913028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038778864,0.000038716193,0.0020337382,0.000077792,0.000009027279,0.00039087972,0.21157789,0.000115547075,0.000334974,0.7738047,0.0039425907,0.007635412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026097963,0.000075218384,0.0068185516,0.0006635028,0.000029058432,0.0007761825,0.51949745,0.0006091923,0.0009212756,0.3191391,0.15138611,0.00005829847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011816879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011572464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005503973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017874575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039934278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398773515","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.14","title":"Creature Features: Character Production and Failed Explanations in Fiction, Folklore, and Theorizing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Folklore; Character (mathematics); Knowledge production; Production (economics); Aesthetics; Epistemology; Literature; Philosophy; Sociology; History; Art; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.020500177826327105,"score_gpt":0.26191090086966473,"score_spread":0.24141072304333763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398773515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61430264,0.002191439,0.07708185,0.029521212,0.00042185033,0.00009988502,0.00013989363,0.0002898152,0.27595142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99743634,0.00006103703,0.0013891229,0.0001261516,0.000025828642,0.0000083333625,0.00001740589,0.00001887317,0.00091697683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969649,0.0019288191,0.00011431826,0.00026609062,0.00049647974,0.00022943431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97599024,0.017831016,0.0020281242,0.001874319,0.0018195219,0.00045666777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005780126,0.0004801663,0.00039360783,0.0026288393,0.0034076564,0.0064317454,0.0018527701,0.004073655,0.006367597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023446374,0.0003377681,0.00037540853,0.0010097553,0.026299573,0.010438533,0.004291208,0.0031531593,0.00033669238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031300424,0.000024191591,0.00159308,0.0000653717,0.00000816198,0.00034517905,0.054727513,0.00041762704,0.000255912,0.93667096,0.0010098501,0.0048508714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004109268,0.00006090086,0.0036017145,0.00026275835,0.000037105983,0.00094718084,0.044773318,0.011928702,0.0016149994,0.9005821,0.036092326,0.000057764348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020453199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016670655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064317454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040411893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001000931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0305686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399054263","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.18","title":"Autonomy, Community, and the Justification of Public Reason","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Uppsala Universitet; Vetenskapsrådet; McGill University","keywords":"Autonomy; Contemporary philosophy; Public reason; Epistemology; General interest; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Democracy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.1667340605976644,"score_gpt":0.33579575405468065,"score_spread":0.16906169345701624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399054263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0818765,0.0034967684,0.055983223,0.12949988,0.0008694943,0.00010630711,0.0000750721,0.00007527656,0.72801745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916313,0.0002763532,0.0019021105,0.0016521694,0.00017910746,0.000047411617,0.00001283782,0.000016398053,0.004282302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803587,0.012897235,0.00044512778,0.0012715277,0.003370314,0.001656981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978682,0.013619683,0.0014717579,0.0020783832,0.0029500057,0.0011982332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016765693,0.0003391556,0.00075951027,0.0021533445,0.006798659,0.008143348,0.0013012444,0.009102388,0.0047738445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021419538,0.00035542354,0.0006817933,0.0011309998,0.05301977,0.007616981,0.006937449,0.0063050725,0.00047243026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031370357,0.000003181075,0.000033008888,0.000004374375,0.000001240611,0.000011644437,0.00021691578,0.00008585835,0.00001062627,0.9989568,0.00031935194,0.00035385496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020642903,0.000004739119,0.00010737189,0.000030071851,0.000002785974,0.000018394461,0.00030713886,0.00045840238,0.000045454843,0.9895716,0.009426545,0.000006919883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005990458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004746864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016765693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008115622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007459923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08866656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403952721","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.30","title":"Opportunity Costs and Resource Allocation Problems: Epistemology for Finite Minds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Resource allocation; Resource (disambiguation); Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.12312714624079654,"score_gpt":0.2737110599725582,"score_spread":0.15058391373176164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403952721","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082730606,0.006216081,0.5805353,0.043378036,0.0004846944,0.00017436255,0.00021283835,0.00012944915,0.28613877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9463161,0.00111369,0.045664594,0.0008805581,0.00042725555,0.00032915242,0.00005554273,0.000056268233,0.0051567024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886402,0.0077088308,0.00044336132,0.0010303677,0.0015953985,0.00058183563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9454711,0.04526381,0.002134303,0.003362136,0.0022735838,0.0014951108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018784974,0.00076480024,0.0013797061,0.004213919,0.0033101756,0.009660773,0.0028186764,0.0042870743,0.009326066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035998955,0.0007453606,0.0015279446,0.0020816233,0.0305066,0.01599738,0.006841477,0.005672584,0.0004632079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000231767,0.0000031989978,0.00003527659,0.000011525198,0.000003849139,0.00000874934,0.000064298634,0.000574504,0.0000085951815,0.9986313,0.000092307375,0.0005640553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002953248,0.0000011952792,0.000019521127,0.00000943665,0.000001216166,0.000006383062,0.000032749056,0.0011150853,0.000006393474,0.9982887,0.00051454426,0.0000017066286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018948464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013163878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018784974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008299448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029077828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099345624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405483114","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.40","title":"Kant on Hope’s Value and Misanthropy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; New York University Shanghai","keywords":"Humanity; Hatred; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Theology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05974680944149803,"score_gpt":0.24922708153567022,"score_spread":0.18948027209417218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405483114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040486574,0.019241832,0.031040248,0.13397981,0.0016763622,0.000042302574,0.000091123205,0.00006394099,0.77337784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805474,0.0022536041,0.00179468,0.004876362,0.00035230236,0.000027035887,0.000011752968,0.000024628947,0.010112221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99390817,0.0042501763,0.00012213996,0.0002855389,0.0009654896,0.00046840863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99489045,0.003340216,0.00032740625,0.0004444541,0.0006394813,0.00035792557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066552646,0.00040395066,0.00043609756,0.0012121733,0.0045678196,0.005711391,0.0006858014,0.0032577778,0.0019456001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062528867,0.00025194953,0.00038800508,0.0007911782,0.055340484,0.0062662284,0.00465159,0.006225403,0.00040573272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005119765,0.000002394344,0.000030212246,0.000010050606,0.0000018710888,0.000020428362,0.0009821136,0.00009517887,0.000013734509,0.9968252,0.0012063493,0.00080741174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050751373,0.0000055065875,0.000051427804,0.000054801705,0.0000027609676,0.000028063101,0.00070566544,0.00014063851,0.00005817583,0.9800631,0.01887847,0.0000063746147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016810594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016576753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066552646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004909849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025348088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03562355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405483150","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.43","title":"What Perceptualists Can Say About Reasons for Emotion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Rationality; Argument (complex analysis); Perception; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Value (mathematics); Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.0798975742085794,"score_gpt":0.3394371427687065,"score_spread":0.2595395685601271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405483150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041070823,0.015599346,0.12294248,0.31253254,0.003133188,0.000056236255,0.00039872935,0.00028107432,0.5039857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688534,0.0029141842,0.0076142387,0.010810865,0.0016066664,0.00007462958,0.00011757307,0.00012039786,0.007888023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568176,0.0021376417,0.00017750027,0.00071534386,0.0008980049,0.00038974665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871531,0.008035373,0.0008836726,0.0014212028,0.0017744977,0.0007322174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069493707,0.0005272148,0.00077223824,0.0020014837,0.0028744503,0.008821647,0.0016020774,0.004975926,0.011339475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016580267,0.00042553683,0.0011260991,0.000884541,0.028420573,0.015444755,0.0034251788,0.0068917493,0.0013962694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010078894,0.000006641278,0.00012449472,0.00003404473,0.0000059956624,0.000024094385,0.00069183024,0.00013871565,0.00004833064,0.99537295,0.0017846578,0.0017581114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055139667,0.000003909485,0.00018676695,0.000040733725,0.0000032502076,0.000024310602,0.0002894381,0.00024095723,0.000033926193,0.99184483,0.00731937,0.0000069031616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026770642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012882383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011339475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003337153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012885174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037934363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405829446","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.33","title":"What constitutes the health subject?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Obesity and Health Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); General interest; Contemporary philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.10541524367428522,"score_gpt":0.4327454672663393,"score_spread":0.32733022359205405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405829446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016970854,0.028808024,0.027307024,0.45353165,0.0042234557,0.00010302221,0.00013063954,0.000058228765,0.46886715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8935342,0.013555739,0.010499652,0.05773388,0.0034403894,0.00015371478,0.000093582814,0.00008203878,0.020906726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98717564,0.008767256,0.0003646612,0.00095598924,0.002081942,0.0006545245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99028945,0.0056828842,0.000517472,0.00052529876,0.0017840895,0.0012008945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016196579,0.0003691421,0.0006642447,0.0023669074,0.0076947147,0.0076885717,0.0011833919,0.004993726,0.005169967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010393065,0.00022057458,0.00038641723,0.0016623535,0.104806244,0.008374959,0.003992007,0.007479037,0.0010311012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032066046,0.000005389815,0.00009104773,0.000030159323,0.0000015543154,0.000017297434,0.004261935,0.000016705446,0.00003231226,0.99218506,0.0020837628,0.0012715689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011307455,0.000012171734,0.00028162295,0.0003167076,0.0000060549323,0.00006687409,0.008631942,0.00012021013,0.00006433378,0.8924115,0.09806623,0.000011097762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02764561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013717558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02764561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01210854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015409474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08785397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406593447","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.49","title":"Transferred Culpability and the Problem of Voluntary Intoxication","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Culpability; Contemporary philosophy; Psychology; Philosophy; General interest; Law and economics; Epistemology; Criminology; Economics","score_opus":0.022412572026451673,"score_gpt":0.22402895944877596,"score_spread":0.2016163874223243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406593447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26529074,0.0026521022,0.10425243,0.06296515,0.00028951908,0.000114714254,0.00005748963,0.000106667256,0.5642712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899132,0.0003899717,0.0017836737,0.0008206507,0.000061817875,0.000032498927,0.0000090490075,0.000012682333,0.0069763693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697876,0.0013043075,0.00009611652,0.00037367234,0.00081244815,0.00043473806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647385,0.0020542296,0.00032271584,0.00062187074,0.00037341597,0.00015381757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037431137,0.00026121523,0.0004879043,0.00078100763,0.0033753288,0.0036587808,0.0014728612,0.004626821,0.006776837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009324911,0.00023831506,0.0005227144,0.0005488762,0.02594451,0.005173856,0.005746502,0.0041811597,0.0002859819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056895774,0.000010403477,0.00009524274,0.000010045214,0.000002478758,0.00017167025,0.0006363131,0.00037838874,0.00008592484,0.9961785,0.00030157928,0.0021236255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000796284,0.0000066489897,0.00013034159,0.00001739415,0.0000018110985,0.0001368144,0.00036087277,0.0010351245,0.000094445124,0.9951308,0.0030740572,0.000003804719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037818772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019261541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006776837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004690478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024115248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034031987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410132230","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.11","title":"Kant on the Theoretical Use of the Ideas of Reason: A Transcendental Interpretation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Princeton University","keywords":"Philosophy; Transcendental number; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); General interest; Transcendental philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Transcendental idealism; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04577995721313702,"score_gpt":0.23030685003607468,"score_spread":0.18452689282293766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410132230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04915502,0.018751763,0.21202159,0.08835973,0.002165605,0.000071481765,0.00021068286,0.00021964789,0.6290445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960235,0.0028476103,0.019549804,0.004226579,0.00088203826,0.00009118342,0.00004881777,0.00010785816,0.012011254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897159,0.006711079,0.00027899566,0.0007260456,0.002001969,0.00056602893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913782,0.0058340775,0.0003651905,0.0011608663,0.0009775232,0.00028425638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00934686,0.00067573367,0.00094381924,0.0035201118,0.0027954532,0.007545977,0.0017320904,0.0047445353,0.0028548965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075113205,0.000499737,0.0012145923,0.0016622269,0.058416717,0.010659167,0.0039568674,0.007615799,0.000628109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046997206,0.0000038255025,0.000014234803,0.000011036212,0.0000026258938,0.000013741299,0.0006629717,0.0001675349,0.000030209258,0.99789643,0.0004741336,0.0007184812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004702793,0.00000253634,0.000021224972,0.000023100565,0.0000022834647,0.000013121285,0.00019455512,0.00023884862,0.000049613944,0.9945182,0.004926645,0.000005127913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018920115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001235472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00934686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058413674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023027116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049431503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413876466","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10019","title":"Bergmann’s Intuitions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; General interest","score_opus":0.0776643556991139,"score_gpt":0.25904500497105193,"score_spread":0.18138064927193803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413876466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01302435,0.0022460627,0.1259364,0.028826684,0.0009748695,0.000084437466,0.00033837144,0.00019231143,0.8283765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91984767,0.0015445633,0.03770515,0.0058956314,0.00078435807,0.00025199627,0.00022704889,0.0001387411,0.033604823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99258435,0.0031066719,0.0004514406,0.0012879813,0.0019704315,0.000599128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99445915,0.0028196108,0.0003414743,0.00081901683,0.0013355331,0.00022523824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00833302,0.0008252622,0.00077741634,0.0030497874,0.0025134399,0.0052546826,0.0016371966,0.0027947393,0.011915448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015686426,0.0005380295,0.0010980055,0.0013794623,0.015887726,0.009141281,0.0033113067,0.0031817046,0.0017201353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002634449,0.000002059421,0.000014197517,0.000009043548,0.0000018600512,0.0000069448415,0.00014408799,0.00011847212,0.000010976505,0.9980647,0.0009973081,0.0006277907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004524842,0.0000019135502,0.000029403205,0.000020111454,0.000002886315,0.000012877495,0.000078846984,0.00046299046,0.00003457718,0.99111474,0.008233348,0.0000038336048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003914794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024554795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011915448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005460396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026304666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044069707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414217285","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10017","title":"A Harm Reduction Approach to Attitudinal Racism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Toronto; Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Harm; Racism; Normative; Harm reduction; Phenomenon; Public policy","score_opus":0.070026348184652,"score_gpt":0.34359619141129805,"score_spread":0.273569843226646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414217285","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042906813,0.0019154896,0.43783593,0.102610394,0.0009614828,0.00034747872,0.00008562327,0.0002063449,0.41313046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9352699,0.0005655288,0.04171736,0.0054714615,0.00039825207,0.00029278442,0.000024384988,0.00004581753,0.0162145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894554,0.0067393985,0.00021717286,0.00070884806,0.0022578733,0.0006213133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99391985,0.002305137,0.0006905423,0.0011648468,0.0015591491,0.00036048106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007941521,0.0006599353,0.0005123951,0.0020481495,0.003235116,0.003722032,0.001707036,0.002863141,0.0036673483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068685086,0.00025610725,0.0008769204,0.0007057687,0.030258745,0.0031202799,0.0047481437,0.005597086,0.00036063045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008161016,0.000045803194,0.0002927059,0.000044893128,0.00000857909,0.000033373162,0.0009903794,0.0010176153,0.00022896029,0.9898201,0.000781204,0.006728173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000107126625,0.00003263676,0.00033939513,0.000056600795,0.000009858234,0.0000668694,0.0006259383,0.0019060342,0.00029915987,0.98466563,0.011975878,0.000011285708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023397685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027369694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007941521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004494768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003821306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04199922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415169570","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10022","title":"Conspiracy Stories","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University College Dublin; Canada First Research Excellence Fund; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta; University of Aberdeen; York University","keywords":"Function (biology); Contemporary philosophy; Social function; Social relation; Social theory","score_opus":0.051693840476313035,"score_gpt":0.32607018318945563,"score_spread":0.2743763427131426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415169570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35950828,0.0035338302,0.03249196,0.034938294,0.0004792411,0.00014421996,0.00039354814,0.0001748635,0.5683358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99262154,0.00040944852,0.001180253,0.00041253967,0.000074960866,0.000023249624,0.000051977877,0.00002327272,0.005202678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99058306,0.006041235,0.00023063656,0.0006922298,0.0018035967,0.00064927933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96756124,0.021406703,0.0030844023,0.003968599,0.0024650686,0.0015139699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044787177,0.0005643236,0.0003504775,0.002779151,0.0064409333,0.0065543097,0.0014257018,0.0025187717,0.007833784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026158437,0.00033342815,0.0002585102,0.0016815492,0.01692025,0.01044416,0.0081572635,0.0032862958,0.0008108381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066020395,0.00005349963,0.0033716785,0.0001409182,0.00003141283,0.0011637451,0.22027332,0.00043542782,0.0006937997,0.73351216,0.009289268,0.030968798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025684309,0.00009579816,0.004222869,0.00044858246,0.000039989496,0.0014826754,0.13575411,0.003132475,0.00260531,0.44328475,0.4088542,0.000053528805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026657663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002135975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007833784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033953423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015702329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026206613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416232585","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10034","title":"Hussain on the Market: Critique or Kvetch?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Universiteit Utrecht; Fordham University; Dartmouth College","keywords":"Complaint; Order (exchange); Capitalism; Property (philosophy)","score_opus":0.03275297266715872,"score_gpt":0.305169837577336,"score_spread":0.2724168649101773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416232585","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042227987,0.016062174,0.00937577,0.56211,0.0027425634,0.000036801222,0.00008052897,0.00007134349,0.36729282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93521255,0.0041931923,0.0012998827,0.022828091,0.0015062144,0.00004090767,0.000016067288,0.000068230285,0.034834802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976283,0.0011710655,0.0000628682,0.00031424186,0.0005412923,0.00028233326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99630713,0.0024710046,0.00019808525,0.00023825698,0.00064018485,0.00014539862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043756342,0.0003795224,0.000734259,0.0011672316,0.0036213996,0.00575949,0.0013291176,0.0068929465,0.007178187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008616318,0.00017382269,0.00035363375,0.0009989333,0.02592515,0.008737381,0.0030329693,0.005099344,0.0006354522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069969524,0.000003777785,0.00002470304,0.000013726255,0.0000017039605,0.000024121204,0.0005563645,0.00013584847,0.000026197205,0.9912942,0.0066064657,0.0013059065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001131803,0.0000070427955,0.000091552734,0.0000954253,0.0000028974446,0.000019594167,0.0015520039,0.0005838641,0.00014493229,0.9387352,0.058745913,0.0000102342565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015147264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009415253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015147264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0090602245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005892898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06573677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416301688","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10032","title":"Introduction: Remembering Waheed Hussain","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Slogan; Sympathy; Relation (database); Politics; Political philosophy; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.017407949926813344,"score_gpt":0.2531626574842556,"score_spread":0.23575470755744224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416301688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018454382,0.03867074,0.0050957026,0.12593037,0.1017256,0.0004148159,0.0061740675,0.0013613366,0.702173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08668921,0.022567553,0.0040393737,0.0254261,0.017455563,0.00013738395,0.0027308294,0.00046394859,0.84049],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976593,0.000056575987,0.0000118507405,0.000045555473,0.00008598405,0.000034172554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995239,0.00012270689,0.000020735286,0.000020870428,0.00021515758,0.00009659504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047689554,0.0007403599,0.00045727912,0.00068243756,0.0037380743,0.0020586054,0.00049100386,0.0014474887,0.10695645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019102141,0.00019602408,0.0003242661,0.0006630066,0.0011184829,0.0023034764,0.0009784152,0.0022195333,0.029287888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062537685,0.000021996128,0.0003780614,0.00022153821,0.0000026481798,0.00020866182,0.0038081808,0.000027747223,0.00045964366,0.0065673073,0.9467771,0.041464616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051578236,0.000025490586,0.0013147647,0.00020331678,0.000002515612,0.00036545613,0.002374779,0.000028641585,0.00027524712,0.0010909693,0.9943053,0.000008412583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01433513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032575257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10695645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016890246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015290573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35780495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416598408","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10036","title":"Freedom and the Invisible Hand: Hussain on the Judgment-Bypassing Character of the Market","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Toronto","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Production (economics); Property (philosophy); Invisible hand","score_opus":0.032477334367969644,"score_gpt":0.27010117412629486,"score_spread":0.2376238397583252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416598408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10951353,0.0062273047,0.04642394,0.15308222,0.0011050083,0.00004853799,0.000058607486,0.00012875469,0.68341213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874895,0.00041594877,0.0011983388,0.0035546059,0.00018515937,0.000012998481,0.0000034160498,0.000022788145,0.007117257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957669,0.0024084607,0.000105305,0.0005125535,0.00070356653,0.0005033157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943486,0.0036783335,0.00041691097,0.0006256752,0.0005763676,0.00035422173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006363673,0.00036618247,0.0005306175,0.0010131033,0.005438906,0.007231514,0.0008417424,0.005012843,0.0043021487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008159624,0.00023552355,0.00047251245,0.00053823716,0.06582892,0.00916242,0.005884264,0.0048957835,0.00041791113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008366467,0.000003140631,0.000043195774,0.0000060589805,0.0000016332988,0.000040716128,0.0013514381,0.00009473594,0.000037534002,0.99663025,0.0009099387,0.000872916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009601445,0.0000074051427,0.000073397525,0.0000297787,0.0000021141277,0.000028443423,0.0008116632,0.0003850728,0.000095245145,0.98696,0.011586421,0.000010813794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068251574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050332854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007231514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045300764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003015024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03365475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416598509","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10033","title":"Patterns, Prices, and Powers: Hussain on Market Governance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Toronto; York University","keywords":"Corporate governance; Market failure; Market system; Economic governance; Free market; Traditional economy; Nonmarket forces","score_opus":0.015979419331976847,"score_gpt":0.19428230957855613,"score_spread":0.17830289024657928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416598509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28283584,0.004938801,0.10049616,0.0955975,0.00036770105,0.00007869265,0.00012778024,0.00011986272,0.5154377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992431,0.0005575135,0.0021489887,0.000788737,0.00012067099,0.000019671139,0.0000074720706,0.000012953115,0.0039130226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975382,0.0012426986,0.00009346351,0.0004109237,0.000472094,0.00024262458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941221,0.0033632235,0.00068843574,0.0007978945,0.000640934,0.00038753587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043813945,0.00021692719,0.000400612,0.0014647933,0.002098904,0.005265608,0.00068901404,0.0019414814,0.004045894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008307316,0.00020039277,0.0002738206,0.0014779578,0.02967287,0.009060764,0.0034532559,0.0018942135,0.00030829984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038539483,0.0000034816494,0.0001278978,0.0000030316817,0.0000010163931,0.000008571243,0.00049725076,0.00039159838,0.000017179791,0.99747145,0.00041685943,0.0010578375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006185231,0.0000032045712,0.00022997335,0.000011065154,9.0997986e-7,0.0000063724433,0.00024039959,0.0007657992,0.00003284424,0.9933514,0.005348185,0.000003633181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007037286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033770762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007037286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004679259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017225468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033950567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416768482","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10037","title":"Boyle’s Elusive Egoism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Ethical egoism; Object (grammar); Contemporary philosophy; Common ground; Cartesianism","score_opus":0.02663639664261033,"score_gpt":0.21185423151371843,"score_spread":0.1852178348711081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416768482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029565418,0.0034257297,0.06908213,0.08871434,0.00075015443,0.000042706226,0.00011214932,0.00021008836,0.80809736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95438445,0.0008708579,0.008153011,0.0032951701,0.00023791114,0.00006274167,0.00003207506,0.00009895428,0.032864783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99364775,0.0037305183,0.00012993751,0.0006888272,0.0014277915,0.00037510955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949044,0.002393785,0.00047128368,0.000723725,0.0011569969,0.00034986413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003901438,0.00030028808,0.00030415072,0.00083925924,0.0044274256,0.004038258,0.00068281457,0.0017644337,0.005220138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008428187,0.0002600126,0.00037943842,0.0005712612,0.020981874,0.0058584632,0.0046328767,0.00536101,0.0012438685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006282472,0.0000025389243,0.00004371747,0.000012015771,0.0000012881916,0.000025937734,0.0020065,0.00007589858,0.000044954864,0.9926779,0.0036107493,0.0014921995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008841072,0.0000075435714,0.00014892826,0.0000708629,0.0000037058853,0.00007716186,0.0011657246,0.0004794668,0.00026592257,0.9158945,0.08186756,0.000009826032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003721044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023644126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005220138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040871417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002531269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029654384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118363983","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10048","title":"Aiding the Impermissible? Kant and the Morality of Medical Assistance in Dying","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leverhulme Trust; Università di Catania; University of Toronto; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; McMaster University","keywords":"Morality; Duty; Public morality; Applied philosophy; General interest","score_opus":0.04104709792010615,"score_gpt":0.27069176917266174,"score_spread":0.2296446712525556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118363983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054915894,0.023192331,0.034659307,0.3738749,0.0023348192,0.000047057758,0.0000730811,0.00008416382,0.5108184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973781,0.0029128075,0.003524262,0.009840284,0.0004860328,0.000028263226,0.000012871637,0.000027450329,0.0093870275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839181,0.013039427,0.0002706449,0.0004210075,0.0014571662,0.00089373277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99149233,0.005720463,0.0006349672,0.0005548663,0.0008971975,0.0007001766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01160941,0.00038561135,0.00042729525,0.0010478451,0.0054549915,0.0073549035,0.0010730507,0.0066425195,0.002980191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012244365,0.0002675586,0.00042665706,0.0007043087,0.07644131,0.0056584864,0.0043357094,0.0074577383,0.0006918803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011914485,0.0000059323343,0.000069026384,0.000028021388,0.0000030579238,0.000040307146,0.002733703,0.00019380909,0.00002793936,0.992759,0.0023063663,0.0018209338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010661105,0.000010158008,0.00012368,0.00017569742,0.000003734599,0.00009031097,0.002184286,0.00025339282,0.00008913199,0.95894814,0.038094033,0.000016780466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025018146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019414908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01160941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051750783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043583205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061397135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7157158287","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10043","title":"Agency and Objectivity: Gomesian Faith or Cartesian Clarity?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Faith; Agency (philosophy); Objectivity (philosophy); CLARITY; Omniscience; Defeasible estate; Denial","score_opus":0.03544088546000915,"score_gpt":0.24543252651944825,"score_spread":0.2099916410594391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7157158287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10921086,0.007751486,0.113637194,0.14661418,0.0009623049,0.000072043105,0.00015769899,0.00024868324,0.6213455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98374605,0.0006484431,0.006144318,0.0022050324,0.0001451484,0.000037319696,0.00002222565,0.00005134837,0.0070001674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951769,0.0032251584,0.00015496313,0.00045327243,0.00070012116,0.0002895302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944401,0.0031903454,0.00042923968,0.0010466257,0.0006453106,0.00024834377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006152315,0.00043651724,0.0005729355,0.0014154178,0.0025738114,0.0058912835,0.00091775495,0.002602549,0.0047291657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011070145,0.00034992964,0.00046080965,0.0008658857,0.044135965,0.01003765,0.005989282,0.0046000625,0.00059229234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073007495,0.0000027133426,0.000035690187,0.000010418957,0.0000018013566,0.000017219125,0.0018893762,0.0000561614,0.000041170533,0.99662423,0.000500654,0.0008133173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008971487,0.0000072770436,0.00011464091,0.000053768483,0.0000044737235,0.00003516005,0.00095280056,0.00025448197,0.000089194175,0.98254824,0.015922964,0.000008049647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028160051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024712582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006152315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031603589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016550865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032536924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W788527436","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2002.10716513","title":"Welfare and Outcome","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Slogan; Egalitarianism; Outcome (game theory); Economics; Consequentialism; Positive economics; Appropriation; Pareto principle; Philosophy; Conviction; Law and economics; Epistemology; Law; Mathematical economics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.10814562091882202,"score_gpt":0.3108222958571961,"score_spread":0.2026766749383741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W788527436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03217839,0.0033723505,0.044141166,0.04925158,0.00066847214,0.00009924895,0.00083233614,0.00008678875,0.8693697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9162202,0.0025522513,0.0064490265,0.005526418,0.0007684772,0.00045812878,0.000620471,0.00018545432,0.06721951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938332,0.002790943,0.00024439138,0.0007959081,0.0009194859,0.0014160972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954562,0.0017357775,0.00061580073,0.00065009086,0.0008958036,0.0006463132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052929097,0.00079111266,0.0007462647,0.001920809,0.0036448112,0.008352942,0.0010222547,0.0033125675,0.022071017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011513119,0.00025027862,0.00066951447,0.0020383932,0.011811056,0.008025763,0.008270057,0.0036958524,0.0021959979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011903672,0.000016094169,0.00051556545,0.000019208466,0.000008967027,0.000020508356,0.00019147426,0.00014839736,0.000028135835,0.9934731,0.0019268363,0.0036397476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009307475,0.00001636564,0.00065482303,0.00005091549,0.0000073407123,0.000028544391,0.00021151577,0.00018851053,0.000054871358,0.98079133,0.017981518,0.0000050833373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018254927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018200228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022071017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004672577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030397347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07383484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W791193263","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2003.10716553","title":"Reconsidering Structural Realism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific realism; Realism; Epistemology; Philosophical realism; Scientific theory; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Nothing; Commit; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Direct and indirect realism; Philosophy of science; Computer science","score_opus":0.1196767269245939,"score_gpt":0.21397565200574545,"score_spread":0.09429892508115155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W791193263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025779046,0.0071529867,0.15294139,0.20816946,0.0023636245,0.00006026613,0.00016683279,0.0001760426,0.6031904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9241526,0.0028379797,0.02001933,0.019652843,0.0025579003,0.00015742611,0.0001315352,0.0002781972,0.030212283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925327,0.003660793,0.00019761128,0.0011640822,0.0017086198,0.0007362182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99045676,0.0060262065,0.0005487232,0.0013841352,0.0010745487,0.00050968275],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009678288,0.00064011256,0.0006967876,0.001356971,0.0047394293,0.006228587,0.0020395322,0.0049980027,0.010986963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016265921,0.0004600311,0.0013695844,0.000845506,0.03421161,0.014801497,0.007587335,0.00993564,0.0015540266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018477594,9.97792e-7,0.00001884736,0.000006198496,0.0000013272484,0.0000061562796,0.00019481477,0.000057767164,0.000018681832,0.9988996,0.00039002823,0.00040376777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004035558,0.000004067508,0.00002429873,0.000016156402,0.000001807871,0.000015480871,0.0001179309,0.000233726,0.000032737546,0.98981875,0.009728879,0.000002212852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028597768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034912373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068535893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037355549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051184297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W829168491","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716587","title":"Inferentialism and Singular Reference","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Expression (computer science); Generality; Epistemology; Extensional definition; Relation (database); Object (grammar); sort; Philosophy; Linguistics; Proposition; Inference; Binary relation; Order (exchange); Mathematics; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Arithmetic; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.03508942666289962,"score_gpt":0.2845320885942227,"score_spread":0.24944266193132308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W829168491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03386188,0.02242753,0.26778668,0.04954921,0.0010141585,0.0000685364,0.00022986779,0.00040745793,0.6246546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90278834,0.005222215,0.043887895,0.0070427563,0.0017850683,0.00013062361,0.00023787977,0.00028546987,0.038619693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993291,0.002606217,0.00032271538,0.0013675534,0.0019214457,0.000491129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551433,0.0026265287,0.00024555513,0.0008610755,0.00057146285,0.00018111679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006520188,0.0005532409,0.00084305793,0.0028931182,0.0056262007,0.006930784,0.0017132106,0.0030656094,0.005775729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007824143,0.00054792146,0.001392095,0.002494846,0.042208873,0.015000974,0.005753838,0.006682683,0.00092992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028120028,0.00000173739,0.000029176319,0.000007958035,0.0000018743272,0.000014429668,0.0005889528,0.000032153384,0.000025476256,0.99770135,0.0003409228,0.0012532123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025730626,0.0000019944105,0.00004350404,0.000010947355,0.0000018226148,0.000024854393,0.00009557603,0.00012452134,0.00004575051,0.99056923,0.009076737,0.0000024706583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054436103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043441225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008094462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008094462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002448052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05872971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}