{"meta":{"query_hash":"1325816d12ec","filters":{"venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy"},"cohort_total":182,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":182,"exported":182,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1325816d12ec","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Canadian+Journal+of+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W117991978","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2003.10716556","title":"James O. Young, Art and Knowledge. London: Routledge2001.Pp. 180.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.038099696943183624,"score_gpt":0.2639860751674464,"score_spread":0.22588637822426275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W117991978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054997187,0.028111946,0.000023863196,0.028880356,0.0030331356,0.00023312503,0.000014872337,0.000015633808,0.88468987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96393776,0.00054175354,0.00020560317,0.0003956994,0.0010670208,0.000001606954,0.0000014454006,0.000012865586,0.033836253],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989751,0.000114142094,0.00027492287,0.000114063005,0.00017296935,0.00034882413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847484,0.00003558846,0.00013581598,0.00007760865,0.00028104396,0.0009950923],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004904023,0.00011766832,0.00019737173,0.00012239299,0.00051104726,0.00015595948,0.00018256283,0.00011321687,0.0012222817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031077574,0.00010260072,0.00007402596,0.00027157206,0.00031987554,0.0002301247,0.0000070973274,0.0002481335,0.000071129376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052321975,0.000015860316,0.013324348,0.0000073194874,0.000051878458,0.0001317147,0.0072565107,0.0000012714164,0.0000062047234,0.07948781,0.894668,0.005043847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002479307,0.00004552211,0.0010649827,0.000053543303,0.00001636952,0.00007132543,0.001591319,3.9465726e-7,0.00002735283,0.013523754,0.98321456,0.00014293718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038123392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06639939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90894055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027773003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023307875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509185071","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.857131","title":"Love: self-propagation, self-preservation, or<i>ekstasis</i>?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Ideal (ethics); Philosophy; Ethical egoism; Economic Justice; Interpersonal communication; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03834628381784829,"score_gpt":0.22317320444533073,"score_spread":0.18482692062748243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509185071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081594184,0.0010466798,0.00011011607,0.18888643,0.003457666,0.0007291868,0.00013661926,0.00011934592,0.72391975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99040765,0.000033454176,0.00025823608,0.0048657567,0.0036246509,0.0000046162318,0.0000062690956,0.000037921534,0.0007614506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983843,0.000115198134,0.0006288034,0.00016617251,0.0003385489,0.00036700757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969329,0.00013779759,0.00035832005,0.0002718571,0.0014295395,0.00086954195],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046729582,0.00020867096,0.0002938477,0.00037487329,0.00037087992,0.00040626986,0.0005251664,0.00011713362,0.009444586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002363685,0.0001593833,0.00016151453,0.00012514362,0.00027130588,0.0011325798,0.000021208158,0.0005630169,0.0008212832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011364974,0.00004895124,0.00009015361,0.000048754653,0.0001321879,0.00007935038,0.00940691,0.000006455397,0.000011632426,0.980155,0.009717762,0.0002915081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034815763,0.00016071211,0.000106558226,0.000058442565,0.00004293283,0.000046822886,0.00026239283,0.000047853777,0.000030738,0.7721199,0.22658859,0.00018692437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020974574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005632357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9088135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014912126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012610658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510964088","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.774846","title":"The use of useless knowledge: Bergson against the pragmatists","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Antithesis; Intuition; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of mind; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.050369098613798395,"score_gpt":0.2117547010551275,"score_spread":0.1613856024413291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510964088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.536954,0.0065767914,0.00005800212,0.20288828,0.0025253678,0.0006724026,0.00020657772,0.000023912735,0.2500947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972431,0.000046646448,0.000022899052,0.00076683296,0.0013175564,0.000004723689,0.0000020719765,0.00001519147,0.0005809774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874127,0.00015750862,0.0005335166,0.00008995001,0.00020207145,0.00027570856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978239,0.0005025513,0.00031131355,0.00026352966,0.00068592513,0.00041277803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027324303,0.00014296034,0.00026538302,0.00013216997,0.00064677355,0.00033741706,0.000552082,0.000044927696,0.0008868226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026866418,0.00006789042,0.00026082608,0.00010632392,0.0014364931,0.00030407673,0.000024119452,0.00032262455,0.000112613685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060572625,0.000023276083,0.00006641572,0.000012663782,0.00016100093,0.000009051365,0.0022235385,0.000013421016,0.00001170367,0.98534846,0.0068203267,0.0053040525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015135302,0.00008284662,0.00020573412,0.00008573726,0.00008606356,0.00000908985,0.00017708188,0.00021050576,0.000040361985,0.6656646,0.33316737,0.00011920274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022241632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015662992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46028915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004398034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023430324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97100854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512819943","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2003.10716538","title":"Hume, a Scottish Socrates?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Content (measure theory); General interest; Philosophy; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04575302338287984,"score_gpt":0.22389817201039658,"score_spread":0.17814514862751674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512819943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025430739,0.0017812012,0.000018413417,0.010382895,0.0020436377,0.00007503346,0.00004658581,0.000010587999,0.9602109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950336,0.000015017195,0.000044493667,0.002688853,0.0017361895,0.0000010624758,0.0000013972898,0.000023988328,0.0004553639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989304,0.000100187186,0.00036857292,0.00010900023,0.00018680026,0.00030504473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998498,0.00006986217,0.00019499708,0.00015401344,0.00036789844,0.00071519543],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005240007,0.00013902983,0.00023554359,0.0002858503,0.00038538518,0.00019350232,0.0002604387,0.0000740805,0.004123849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026330655,0.00012214256,0.00018049042,0.000058472095,0.00053161796,0.00019125831,0.000005059516,0.0005009792,0.00013120339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044519,0.000012188985,0.00005711639,0.0000120055865,0.00004264915,0.0001653998,0.0018824562,0.0000026857524,0.0000117956,0.99580294,0.0018541337,0.00015215986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022703597,0.000100340185,0.000011046533,0.00005621503,0.000018597158,0.000056587636,0.0001161322,9.5036694e-7,0.00003772259,0.78351605,0.21573925,0.00012009886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041561516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005217204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9696029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068850306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009420131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99678653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513512365","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2010.10716730","title":"Obligation and Advantage in Hobbes' <i>Leviathan</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Covenant; Prudence; Philosophy; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.019850775716241414,"score_gpt":0.21401523493230512,"score_spread":0.1941644592160637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513512365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8194779,0.00088063674,0.000003506534,0.024421046,0.0025207319,0.00013495582,0.00010128392,0.000008981523,0.15245095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99543947,0.000022122149,0.00005263438,0.0016790633,0.0026488302,0.0000012609003,0.000004018611,0.000013297561,0.00013932966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991271,0.000033658784,0.00034141447,0.00010666343,0.0001302305,0.0002609278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990102,0.00006490419,0.000104483144,0.000102346814,0.000101247926,0.000616826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019878309,0.000118657765,0.00019867496,0.00028540395,0.0001239651,0.000100802026,0.0001563355,0.000063016225,0.0008888841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009628371,0.000099657824,0.00007729787,0.00005254554,0.00032587038,0.00030042444,0.00000952575,0.00050906406,0.000027299808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000107184605,0.000022175402,0.001774663,0.000017696568,0.00001017919,0.000098928176,0.0014727884,3.2920926e-7,0.00012946254,0.9952555,0.00038622678,0.0008213867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050419057,0.00011817841,0.0011646508,0.00007478705,0.000016828144,0.000072524206,0.00014908834,0.0000079086885,0.000076175165,0.686462,0.31119668,0.00015698829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006994609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01599282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31081045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027589806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014796261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9732658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519794797","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2015.1053677","title":"Ideology, inquiry, and antiquity: a critical notice of Lloyd’s <i>The Ideals of Inquiry: An Ancient History</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Notice; Positivism; Ideology; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Sociology; Comparative history; Philosophy; Social science; History; Law; Political science; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.13807569006421916,"score_gpt":0.3350928061576015,"score_spread":0.19701711609338235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519794797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90150046,0.024476273,0.00009918233,0.04029848,0.005494201,0.00020390695,0.000036830745,0.0000092012915,0.02788144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970733,0.000036331312,0.00020720396,0.0015152756,0.0010896092,9.062621e-7,4.027021e-7,0.0000063434327,0.000070662434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844646,0.00035778267,0.00044973343,0.00011958108,0.00034501127,0.0002814358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997791,0.0002172355,0.0002506703,0.00013883642,0.0006621495,0.0009401037],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015253997,0.00009704059,0.00035870812,0.0001821652,0.00020123862,0.000012199313,0.00029822325,0.000088617264,0.000040421644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016706461,0.00007489278,0.00008026168,0.00020666675,0.0032445616,0.00030701843,0.000025414114,0.00019860856,0.0000014992534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088335946,0.00011026992,0.012763293,0.00007024943,0.0000734532,0.00020288845,0.39979538,0.0000057578904,0.00015480303,0.5191162,0.06636664,0.0012527233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045888074,0.00092876813,0.0038590562,0.00009239153,0.000095872725,0.000045013752,0.007952694,0.000004954933,0.000019019331,0.049445216,0.9369212,0.00017693553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013076145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015342599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87055457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003477199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017187693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521499787","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.774841","title":"Moral coherence and value pluralism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Pluralism (philosophy); Moral reasoning; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Norm (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10659358407311816,"score_gpt":0.4063576546038145,"score_spread":0.29976407053069637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521499787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3923996,0.0021113942,0.000101123616,0.3195297,0.0040507847,0.0006619616,0.000021009027,0.000018883791,0.28110555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827938,0.000033124175,0.0012369524,0.01430348,0.0012153485,0.000006608353,8.1942727e-7,0.000016090653,0.00039379552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979243,0.00084789237,0.00049115956,0.00010356785,0.00026050574,0.0003725213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99606663,0.0014553437,0.00036380638,0.0001652165,0.00052208465,0.0014269062],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001683334,0.00009951493,0.00021452052,0.00016651128,0.0006768606,0.000024640543,0.00027026594,0.00023057565,0.0022195398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004561926,0.00008263515,0.000039815437,0.00011906041,0.00034781036,0.00041512412,0.000024495926,0.0034137075,0.00037284454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017216531,0.000016192971,0.06901967,0.00018383401,0.000079477904,0.00031518712,0.0073131244,0.000006628614,0.0001803104,0.7961399,0.12425751,0.0024709434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056469714,0.000111231035,0.017544424,0.000409461,0.000028606986,0.000071448274,0.00095552474,0.000028347598,0.0000059226068,0.9553841,0.024766915,0.00012937245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017078428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033389158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5903942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014519019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018771698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99888545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523006892","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716583","title":"How to Distinguish Autonomy from Integrity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Suspect; Value (mathematics); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06079187571652715,"score_gpt":0.2361941257216291,"score_spread":0.17540225000510196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523006892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10016087,0.0009909469,0.00018151877,0.4405347,0.0027088504,0.00016305833,0.00048450043,0.000028796614,0.45474675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98008937,0.0000018744909,0.00037100326,0.0058982954,0.013182656,0.0000015266494,0.0000054269467,0.000020437716,0.00042938453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904656,0.000052615305,0.00030556752,0.00014187716,0.00018068438,0.00027268683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981284,0.00010597518,0.0001624207,0.00018546393,0.00037605298,0.0010416653],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030202846,0.00015140955,0.00025740394,0.00024449703,0.0002848447,0.00040915844,0.00042299266,0.0000756955,0.0012230673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042695334,0.00012992113,0.00016168432,0.00004441261,0.0002848791,0.00027681794,0.000018715416,0.00073544827,0.00009708147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010387102,0.000015652973,0.00006706186,0.0000045358906,0.000044079814,0.00006146834,0.007972781,0.0000042048005,0.000011099463,0.98669976,0.0016615633,0.0034473895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011714531,0.000056258832,0.00006067903,0.00005182042,0.000013859116,0.0000045322195,0.00012130023,0.0000059317954,0.000019596928,0.5303224,0.46912342,0.00010310907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003444033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045559183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8799285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002136714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008666736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534313741","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.857133","title":"Acts, ideas, and objects in Berkeley's metaphysics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Analogy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Identity (music); Perception; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02511545714350636,"score_gpt":0.1850818441438719,"score_spread":0.15996638700036556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534313741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42292285,0.004272526,0.0000068970726,0.013396303,0.001755539,0.00024753623,0.0000247829,0.000011526917,0.5573621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792415,0.000013437352,0.00006370027,0.000824903,0.00091926055,0.0000019166027,5.4886306e-7,0.000008945108,0.00024312371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917006,0.000039336137,0.0002825091,0.000110154215,0.00015224326,0.0002456989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989999,0.000048395927,0.00012380692,0.00010172143,0.00016091445,0.0005652726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016400625,0.00010954319,0.0002153646,0.00032136185,0.00020080227,0.00014665941,0.00021972369,0.000034180644,0.0005559985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072437666,0.000091353024,0.00006931854,0.00009492734,0.00033531353,0.00067403103,0.000008369547,0.00025001855,0.000058802212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037972281,0.00002100509,0.00057468953,0.000019365341,0.000019220615,0.00008127837,0.01379626,0.0000064109186,0.00005093566,0.9801254,0.0035401387,0.0017614771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030095823,0.00016738876,0.0013753147,0.000072157534,0.000016920201,0.000024798068,0.0004551566,0.000021728123,0.000016880858,0.8872555,0.11008659,0.00020662173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057977643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01669511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5750013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009953011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000274957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9316264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541078292","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2012.981030","title":"Hume, Locke and consciousness","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Introspection; Consciousness; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04432207747198102,"score_gpt":0.2075328743048957,"score_spread":0.16321079683291467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541078292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22597414,0.010795245,0.000035109188,0.012174109,0.006660095,0.00012579757,0.00005728625,0.000016476772,0.7441617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99562854,0.0000065200725,0.00003734464,0.00088129216,0.0030652306,4.8794203e-7,4.098717e-7,0.000007674833,0.0003725303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992881,0.000028391607,0.0002160366,0.00006481173,0.0001322063,0.0002704666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987189,0.000036949685,0.00011016789,0.00008393649,0.00013717328,0.0009128794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024987326,0.00008789369,0.0001566379,0.00020600263,0.00040353206,0.00007640015,0.0001700585,0.000030682302,0.00069301657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060438877,0.000072011084,0.000057694044,0.000046127974,0.0005783466,0.00047643174,0.0000069599305,0.00017054216,0.000047737096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004110527,0.00001429351,0.0017674441,0.000010915667,0.000012857758,0.000025364929,0.013521166,4.811913e-7,0.000014761856,0.9770504,0.006906279,0.0006719292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020826599,0.000113782204,0.00043212392,0.000034909648,0.000024952547,0.000106336556,0.000363933,0.0000020922203,0.00001797461,0.14323175,0.85528934,0.0001745593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076394575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027441767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84838307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070014394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001964768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75880456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551743605","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2004.10716561","title":"Finding Value in Davidson","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Argument (complex analysis); Attribution; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Commit; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Feeling; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04629278078964294,"score_gpt":0.22484921115415216,"score_spread":0.17855643036450922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551743605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5027513,0.0020864129,0.000016423097,0.027640684,0.002734771,0.000112721624,0.000038033668,0.000010984775,0.46460867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99681497,0.0000061549053,0.00007582246,0.00097437453,0.001935354,7.1622054e-7,0.0000017059593,0.0000128007905,0.00017812652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992092,0.000039911665,0.0003166944,0.00008939868,0.00009317434,0.00025157584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993447,0.000035880494,0.00014125562,0.000104226594,0.000074469885,0.00029948138],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025946638,0.00011196447,0.00020453318,0.000501887,0.00019615017,0.000053301075,0.0002574975,0.000061021143,0.0010316572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057397654,0.000103513834,0.00010955397,0.000054087002,0.00028669916,0.00027687335,0.0000056228037,0.0003509696,0.00009417716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136716635,0.000016029066,0.00060645153,0.000008916023,0.000019827305,0.00032768835,0.009618536,0.0003284259,0.000007916166,0.988558,0.00032443617,0.00017008885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006949271,0.00017217477,0.00048465934,0.00018271248,0.000014804542,0.000076864664,0.00018987033,0.0000011946905,0.000035589583,0.94914764,0.048867848,0.00013169929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033163028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027058203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49406365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013876526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004888914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554238490","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.827402","title":"Conversation and responsibility, by Michael McKenna, New York, Oxford University Press, 2012, xi + 246 pp, US $74.00, ISBN 978-0-19-974003-1","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03216944823442957,"score_gpt":0.20728046673391312,"score_spread":0.17511101849948355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554238490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9154398,0.006823521,0.0002533567,0.053513866,0.0017494528,0.0007355677,0.00037579532,0.000043506196,0.021065174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99246424,0.00033549836,0.0001728686,0.0018953391,0.00036116468,5.231813e-7,0.0000035878586,0.000020839452,0.0047459286],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984943,0.00020036014,0.00032738887,0.0003232672,0.00025516935,0.0003994968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976895,0.00012912045,0.00028466986,0.00027829834,0.000117474825,0.0015009242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020891523,0.00020025001,0.0002498606,0.00022243695,0.00024636273,0.000111132664,0.00048761314,0.00012846073,0.0004553968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032503164,0.00019730674,0.000105877974,0.00023860429,0.00034448196,0.0009981233,0.000042058728,0.00035092633,0.00003313224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019192586,0.00007354848,0.009946038,0.000069942456,0.000045045577,0.000492147,0.0012533364,0.00003449393,0.027729545,0.014963407,0.94192946,0.0032710922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016036981,0.00037565368,0.005819395,0.00008112829,0.000052461204,0.00020808367,0.00013789718,0.00018219775,0.003590802,0.024514074,0.9630002,0.00043441774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017088044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023394185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07702449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019764157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095777615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98945725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554450515","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.816177","title":"Completing Rawls's arguments for equal political liberty and its fair value: the argument from self-respect","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Politics; Civil liberties; Law; Primary goods; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06147231165065698,"score_gpt":0.30759687794022605,"score_spread":0.24612456628956908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554450515","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29013556,0.0017879023,0.0002987407,0.562442,0.002104692,0.0014304374,0.0004153013,0.00005286968,0.1413325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902826,0.000013751597,0.00041154123,0.006004789,0.003198634,0.000010703276,0.0000035507323,0.00001800401,0.00005645652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977519,0.00033715405,0.00044478066,0.00018423046,0.00042931276,0.0008526313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963307,0.0011844032,0.0001703551,0.00013745249,0.00033940247,0.001837705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009398723,0.00016654743,0.00027640007,0.00011521215,0.0010797483,0.00026085257,0.0004967099,0.00016261647,0.00020367814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010927009,0.00012477305,0.00016043053,0.000121539284,0.0004697149,0.00033774617,0.00003064228,0.00049231027,0.000042846175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006663361,0.00002497282,0.00030841847,0.000011565013,0.00008264988,0.000011997891,0.0028419718,0.0000020229018,0.000021671627,0.99506456,0.0015090824,0.000114431285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045826507,0.00014027662,0.00079499185,0.00006553596,0.00006754129,0.0000064808664,0.00067635643,0.00009894735,0.000044713466,0.9661717,0.03131097,0.00016422717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019687545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025386533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70014703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035732842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011581144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9868404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571029765","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2012.981006","title":"Hume, a Scottish Locke? Comments on Terence Penelhum’s Hume","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Skepticism; Epistemology; Consciousness; Perception; Content (measure theory)","score_opus":0.0719869839664362,"score_gpt":0.23905481641070225,"score_spread":0.16706783244426604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571029765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0769705,0.0020009056,0.000011279662,0.021898655,0.0045922133,0.00021756867,0.00021417647,0.000026662568,0.89406806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863749,0.000007995164,0.000029972898,0.00463275,0.008113051,0.0000026373973,0.0000071577842,0.000031256626,0.0008002932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850017,0.00007639487,0.00045507087,0.00013511718,0.00029162,0.0005416295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807155,0.000060827464,0.00027611383,0.00023052674,0.00017671482,0.0011842774],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002508313,0.0002259876,0.0003226044,0.00034319804,0.00048515375,0.00019011249,0.00042892748,0.00007112043,0.0027885833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005468128,0.00019558397,0.00021674516,0.000068486035,0.00037981512,0.00057380326,0.00001980903,0.00049216545,0.0004041936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033278346,0.00014273492,0.0011928381,0.000025472145,0.00007344275,0.000107926935,0.0048482027,0.0000018000179,0.000012851302,0.95176184,0.0388648,0.0029348398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006585801,0.0004593837,0.001091894,0.00027835,0.000065478125,0.000062811574,0.00020251906,0.0000032576438,0.000074399104,0.20761947,0.7891316,0.00035229122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007684006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042493045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9094044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016542306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002229837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583668695","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.857136","title":"A Humean theory of moral intuition","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"Jenny ja Antti Wihurin Rahasto; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Phenomenology (philosophy); Philosophy; Perception; Moral psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.12233598966201832,"score_gpt":0.24763957646410129,"score_spread":0.12530358680208298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583668695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96085435,0.00010780011,0.00012869475,0.009681898,0.00070395105,0.00009240424,0.000016874452,0.000004037125,0.028409984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973392,0.0000057872726,0.000108706765,0.0022039602,0.00025644433,0.0000012529115,5.686081e-7,0.000006390717,0.00007770399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992502,0.00009080621,0.000259906,0.000089955516,0.00014441827,0.000164736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992324,0.00004668469,0.00018191476,0.00009475769,0.00009537065,0.00034886296],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016843817,0.00007155341,0.00013215229,0.00024083875,0.00006698918,0.000014699553,0.0002442647,0.00004234529,0.00097243476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013301542,0.00005977242,0.00009041053,0.000115188675,0.0002466984,0.00021736432,0.0000068707996,0.0001589962,0.00011109315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007457221,0.00013742334,0.0035381282,0.00003605376,0.000036727295,0.00024787727,0.0007597118,0.00007518748,0.105760805,0.8581502,0.017771324,0.013411997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034021967,0.00029044435,0.011653157,0.00006067533,0.0000090998055,0.00021069113,0.00003060177,0.0000079295405,0.010853786,0.9757273,0.0007341903,0.00008191312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022908559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006526949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1175771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044866814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015655454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592944988","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716589","title":"Memory and Personal Identity in Spinoza","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Personal identity; Identity (music); Philosophy; Epistemology; Human being; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Aesthetics; Self; Theology; Humanity","score_opus":0.041950645943017395,"score_gpt":0.2478387356892383,"score_spread":0.20588808974622091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592944988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7853185,0.005561655,0.000003790698,0.05089615,0.0011656118,0.000116625524,0.00008721931,0.000008600517,0.15684184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99240875,0.000028826507,0.000034758323,0.002562433,0.004627508,7.9057656e-7,0.0000016579564,0.000011066069,0.00032417913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990474,0.000045634868,0.00033802135,0.00010797232,0.0001725679,0.00028842027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990699,0.000037406295,0.000084181534,0.00006759591,0.00008848524,0.00065241527],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020456928,0.00011879013,0.0002124393,0.00028511256,0.00014269071,0.000114077186,0.00016427963,0.00004695563,0.0022500055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055118973,0.00010292794,0.000103568986,0.000051163097,0.0003473199,0.00054746505,0.000012145168,0.00031943698,0.000056943576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017721266,0.00004272473,0.00078956835,0.000026297219,0.000028440394,0.00015976674,0.0063975677,0.0000025053514,0.0000055864643,0.9887044,0.0010175292,0.002807881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010919349,0.00019644573,0.0035799998,0.00018612415,0.000039707786,0.00016046771,0.00061688863,0.000038761627,0.000028551669,0.6025532,0.3912007,0.00030722763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012964992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02450451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39018315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100266916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016954044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1710638876","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2002.10716524","title":"Contingent Natures and Virtuous Knowers: Could Epistemology be ‘Gendered’","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Fallacy; Rationality; Philosophy; Feminist epistemology; Reading (process); Social epistemology; Sociology; Feminist philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06499314415635483,"score_gpt":0.2860263510570169,"score_spread":0.22103320690066208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1710638876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13693991,0.08091031,0.00002551747,0.20917697,0.004485636,0.00029681658,0.00005373544,0.000028436034,0.5680827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947668,0.00058175327,0.00008912893,0.0025978228,0.0007195542,0.0000014151001,5.2028616e-7,0.000009241186,0.001233776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987545,0.00021312671,0.00030625905,0.00015229554,0.00017632387,0.0003975051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874914,0.00014882044,0.00021457057,0.00010534064,0.0001745718,0.00060754543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054187665,0.00012710191,0.00029423286,0.00021390748,0.0008255227,0.00004721977,0.000253365,0.0002088991,0.000318016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003947299,0.00012178904,0.00009379157,0.00013759799,0.0010797848,0.000106990774,0.0000148998815,0.0003592819,0.000013767761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060169477,0.0001002888,0.057184342,0.00010371349,0.00076042494,0.003395787,0.14404842,0.0000075378703,0.000026093687,0.5894704,0.19665442,0.008188397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011089738,0.00057462475,0.0069135022,0.0000966686,0.00014145701,0.00065688003,0.012392762,0.000008099631,0.00002942635,0.09879303,0.8787953,0.0004892432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002636278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03498835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8578269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120389566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032470823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9826206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1762560894","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2012.981033","title":"The self and the passions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Sympathy; Philosophy; Centrality; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; Presentation (obstetrics); General interest; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.03286595753880151,"score_gpt":0.2168803877898635,"score_spread":0.18401443025106198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1762560894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025219973,0.016198015,0.0000055343626,0.38658375,0.0035480193,0.00017312997,0.000031681917,0.000011919525,0.568228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932677,0.00011705492,0.0000060924417,0.0024921466,0.003974538,0.000001853971,2.4000326e-7,0.000009303038,0.0001310562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992643,0.00012798357,0.00020748485,0.000038707887,0.00012476047,0.00023676384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986939,0.00045985336,0.000122032194,0.0001268737,0.00012905065,0.00046829827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010923,0.000077693374,0.00011797623,0.000057935675,0.001287706,0.00017300271,0.00023496455,0.000034089655,0.00017303266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017750527,0.000034442935,0.00009437096,0.000023955547,0.001202896,0.00015874072,0.0000147637065,0.00041973146,0.000019060413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011448655,0.0000053130457,0.00003760062,0.0000027406054,0.000042446205,0.0000039171514,0.008322594,1.4325525e-7,4.642827e-7,0.9902688,0.0008590973,0.00044543578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020015436,0.000016521593,0.000063973326,0.000012943197,0.00002256834,0.000023858152,0.00027282588,0.0000024202952,9.329465e-7,0.63007855,0.3692692,0.000036040983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039673972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033979847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96804774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023986735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002303137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99041235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1840155493","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.803831","title":"Critical notice for Michail Peramatzis's<i>Priority in Aristotle's Metaphysics</i>, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2011","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); General interest; Contemporary philosophy; Political science; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03402440728527498,"score_gpt":0.21639241914787596,"score_spread":0.182368011862601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1840155493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.162265,0.0027027356,0.00070219464,0.0871533,0.0068016206,0.0016576302,0.0014065059,0.0000728955,0.7372381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99573165,0.000022282764,0.00034903918,0.00083962944,0.0022883054,0.0000036077686,0.000008423932,0.000028020399,0.00072902086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859226,0.000089783745,0.0004382498,0.00021675111,0.00018964561,0.00047333218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801344,0.00030099374,0.00017456937,0.00021309292,0.0005736188,0.00072430377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021594691,0.00022522612,0.00043779204,0.00030247183,0.00037872585,0.0001957465,0.00044627136,0.00010937127,0.00082598213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016469364,0.00021497432,0.00033011838,0.00006162917,0.0005307348,0.0009728337,0.000025404335,0.00052754616,0.000026907788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053113257,0.000093952105,0.00012708044,0.00007159383,0.000064175925,0.00008075947,0.0016641034,0.000012527204,0.000009289188,0.99089587,0.006451504,0.00047606122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006974453,0.0001997136,0.00033156417,0.000058982216,0.0000898203,0.000010207184,0.0003726028,0.000087082655,0.000022690545,0.47179884,0.5260879,0.00024320028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051275026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0081360275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83346665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018998775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000376048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90439254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905170937","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.870731","title":"Not the optimistic type","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Manitoba","funders":"Ohio State University","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Type (biology)","score_opus":0.03870880881516123,"score_gpt":0.271170317405452,"score_spread":0.23246150859029077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905170937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06708348,0.00066603115,0.0001364224,0.059371985,0.0031138652,0.00016786091,0.000010413266,0.000008062468,0.86944187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950203,0.0000020932953,0.000089020716,0.003720454,0.00087139657,0.0000023747202,3.3680087e-7,0.000008982675,0.00028504955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991086,0.000089075766,0.00024140315,0.000103770806,0.00014568704,0.00031147257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862593,0.00013551975,0.00011635195,0.0002462734,0.0001988116,0.00067713705],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003012574,0.00009179487,0.00013013919,0.00010350323,0.00016824511,0.000060716542,0.00062298076,0.000060920473,0.0075277877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020512799,0.00005667873,0.000082798106,0.00026087635,0.00049390947,0.000112831985,0.000010190679,0.00030643528,0.0015761288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011062449,0.0000103261855,0.00013050619,0.0000015492886,0.000027119231,0.00008821086,0.00040023934,0.000010080062,0.00006400738,0.9920197,0.0058091967,0.0014280179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020112276,0.00022176476,0.0059546987,0.000019678999,0.000022174407,0.00025266685,0.000062884224,0.000017822644,0.0000352221,0.981283,0.011817735,0.000111245645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012169244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001263866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9279368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044906115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024658674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905410130","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.816176","title":"On preferring God's non-existence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Monash University","keywords":"Theism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Existence of God; Natural (archaeology); History; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03404541818901036,"score_gpt":0.19995835369775883,"score_spread":0.16591293550874847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905410130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24689615,0.00033065092,0.0000059222516,0.011395996,0.0017632489,0.00012719173,0.000018850533,0.000009801406,0.7394522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941004,0.000003251323,0.000049089136,0.0022656992,0.0022660883,0.0000031421546,0.0000013893631,0.000016244147,0.001294678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991724,0.00003448053,0.00029186514,0.00011019014,0.000118191456,0.00027287944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886185,0.000071264214,0.00018049766,0.00017383674,0.00022027882,0.00049226946],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013492696,0.00014307021,0.00021228434,0.00028591088,0.00034065967,0.000115215335,0.00036141172,0.000048036687,0.009265853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005503755,0.00011872483,0.00013608015,0.000029840148,0.00036287008,0.00036394896,0.000007841249,0.00035147366,0.000833055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012037575,0.000015961745,0.000182777,0.000013436592,0.00004697837,0.000075319156,0.0033752667,0.000014901389,0.000010908196,0.9850716,0.010611882,0.0005689149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031254572,0.00042990874,0.00069296034,0.00015565276,0.0000212428,0.00005309833,0.00015949865,0.000008061689,0.000038366252,0.9415396,0.05640818,0.00018090583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001964877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036625217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74720424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005474266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022186815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1937855216","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2015.1079002","title":"Who's afraid of the big bad wolf? The interweaving of values and science","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Research Council Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Scientific evidence; Process (computing); Raw data; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.0714562079156887,"score_gpt":0.22427422782599132,"score_spread":0.15281801991030264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1937855216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7914895,0.0032484976,0.000005659933,0.013376722,0.002833553,0.000115557865,0.000039998762,0.0000033573879,0.18888716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987101,0.0000065104973,0.000019028585,0.00039489404,0.0006484577,3.4283917e-7,4.9858556e-8,0.000005006222,0.00021560685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990358,0.000044094064,0.0002991588,0.00009329927,0.0003568258,0.00017087474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862856,0.00004279034,0.00034295715,0.00020198479,0.00047551884,0.00030816588],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091748004,0.00008365404,0.0001748201,0.00026845414,0.0005243587,0.0000811175,0.0008535348,0.000018479757,0.00004504054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022202941,0.000047542995,0.0000823827,0.00014268777,0.005982849,0.00036773243,0.00004452715,0.00018056565,0.0000014486307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021623255,0.000025781943,0.0017438764,0.000039495957,0.000034918445,0.000012716286,0.1426365,0.000027709946,0.000888204,0.84779525,0.0037661865,0.0030077281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005673707,0.00061330304,0.004264234,0.00072226016,0.00007850761,0.00010661614,0.008117316,0.000052628646,0.0013389015,0.89702094,0.08685815,0.0002597629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001347216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004043229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20722061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007446557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013228973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1946559500","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2015.1079001","title":"Evidence: wanted, alive or dead","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Jackman Humanities Institute, University of Toronto","keywords":"Presupposition; Epistemology; Relation (database); Underdetermination; Politics; Scientific theory; Philosophy of science; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2741833162220523,"score_gpt":0.36893186041977394,"score_spread":0.09474854419772166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1946559500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08387545,0.037750393,0.00014398078,0.21380292,0.008985449,0.00037214963,0.000034597226,0.000034593755,0.65500045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99574655,0.00014565024,0.0002019844,0.0010543971,0.0013714572,0.0000011262183,2.3920654e-7,0.000006005406,0.0014726006],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988957,0.00021203024,0.00024627981,0.00009177746,0.00025068695,0.0003035071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998113,0.00017813919,0.00016372393,0.000093567454,0.00046505695,0.0009865165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011163703,0.00008343701,0.00019975123,0.00016589771,0.00045390302,0.00004046289,0.00035165818,0.00009649327,0.00020032738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019744528,0.00006625624,0.000077274235,0.00023445203,0.00065263256,0.0002328004,0.000010331731,0.00019493312,0.00007915157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042991646,0.00005384119,0.082362585,0.000052920273,0.00048488926,0.0060183713,0.2670749,0.000022991835,0.000008495203,0.23645796,0.39964607,0.0073870555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010841157,0.0011326172,0.004234685,0.0006634548,0.00015170303,0.00047753748,0.047636926,0.0000024820374,0.000038119204,0.3424973,0.6015892,0.00049185613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01023511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14091638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9118711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002667927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055126064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99635583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950021091","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2012.981031","title":"Hume’s atheism and the role of Cleanthes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Atheism; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Reading (process); Natural (archaeology); History; Linguistics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.017094857667154736,"score_gpt":0.24924078709448458,"score_spread":0.23214592942732984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950021091","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.123230256,0.008880644,0.000022017717,0.015486434,0.0004803359,0.00008027151,0.00003148036,0.0000024767073,0.8517861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981912,0.000056426255,0.00006511335,0.00050353573,0.0010645909,2.7346755e-7,1.3653322e-7,0.000002681695,0.00011608209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994386,0.000100901874,0.00013825818,0.000023744886,0.00011993665,0.00017855849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991738,0.00015225312,0.00012838304,0.000047614372,0.00009027515,0.00040765596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005284665,0.000038970764,0.000110926405,0.000054559445,0.0002660382,0.000013555424,0.00013839596,0.000027796657,0.00008759877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017806869,0.000026703186,0.000057410452,0.000062734245,0.0021101518,0.00012157228,0.0000045041647,0.00009061752,0.0000033806095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046856444,0.0000032754506,0.007130598,0.0000011376613,0.000014337907,0.0000011987446,0.002736697,5.625798e-7,0.0000033002777,0.9892154,0.0001452096,0.0007436343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017083432,0.000017768196,0.0013645496,0.000019884652,0.00002969919,0.000021691103,0.0018859775,5.7164635e-7,0.000027441756,0.15229473,0.8441168,0.00005006699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01636152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037164588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8749609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036609825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014144673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9901886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1954895053","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2015.1079004","title":"Social values influence the adequacy conditions of scientific theories: beyond inductive risk","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Objectivity (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Underdetermination; Philosophy of science; Relevance (law); Empirical evidence; Positive economics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05882964602861137,"score_gpt":0.3322949212887322,"score_spread":0.2734652752601209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1954895053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88420415,0.0011624364,0.000015028825,0.022925418,0.0015771342,0.00014649771,0.0001303841,0.000005840922,0.08983309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988721,0.000009813338,0.000035359215,0.00020246283,0.00066094694,0.000002238887,0.0000011348434,0.000004657131,0.00021128664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985697,0.00047379083,0.0002921287,0.00010387024,0.0003137353,0.00024675825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998005,0.00022538155,0.00042243884,0.000113443144,0.00091158546,0.00032220344],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019565108,0.000082767176,0.00019599647,0.00018308325,0.0022640224,0.00006775768,0.00046328237,0.00008648417,0.000035330984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014672092,0.00006232496,0.00010500984,0.00044250226,0.0053583775,0.00026827888,0.000017660277,0.00029662572,0.0000119107835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013925635,0.000014911366,0.020647299,0.0000045215784,0.00012167423,0.000019494522,0.22045322,0.000017045315,0.0000066922103,0.74919564,0.009326039,0.00017953354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001782614,0.00007854808,0.0109963715,0.0000156371,0.000057242418,0.000006705474,0.03644233,2.8095485e-7,0.000024542655,0.942164,0.009963288,0.00007277413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058965357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02032979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19296837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013633083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003351558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1959395712","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2015.1079003","title":"Whose social values? Evaluating Canada's ‘death of evidence’ controversy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Relativism; Negotiation; Social epistemology; Context (archaeology); Politics; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.40395329886223685,"score_gpt":0.41299525769315093,"score_spread":0.009041958830914076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1959395712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42207497,0.019046541,0.000058476544,0.20560597,0.008341411,0.0005482368,0.00012357999,0.00001721894,0.3441836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756473,0.000017265418,0.00011295286,0.0006318671,0.0012820545,0.0000010516937,4.6842422e-7,0.0000066568946,0.00038293007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981839,0.00040216953,0.0004030454,0.00010353267,0.00057262165,0.00033470706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765897,0.0002787846,0.00042639187,0.000083976636,0.00091064273,0.0006412555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021915596,0.000100706115,0.00033543905,0.00012108696,0.0005817558,0.000023393144,0.0003504803,0.0000906476,0.00005653101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029971742,0.00008810578,0.00010299604,0.00016777181,0.00046072114,0.00016555065,0.000013543896,0.00020620925,0.0000029053847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035285967,0.00006080526,0.20442231,0.000112945076,0.00091801706,0.0010545724,0.20222169,0.00014281791,0.000056931844,0.3496253,0.23460823,0.0064235264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045849034,0.0021706226,0.06503222,0.00094960246,0.0007378375,0.00012660057,0.08924054,0.000042022974,0.00015774426,0.68292004,0.1528801,0.0011577462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77832973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92037654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57548976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069981394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019438831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98612005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1962810377","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2010.10716726","title":"Integrity and Moral Danger","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05005797442260495,"score_gpt":0.24240552685071237,"score_spread":0.19234755242810742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1962810377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97140986,0.0001064049,0.0000065564222,0.0080843475,0.0012504695,0.000034096047,0.000017820206,0.000004085651,0.019086381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979388,0.000006364726,0.00017472802,0.0011237934,0.00065937644,3.052909e-7,1.3233164e-7,0.0000071082686,0.00008939854],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994644,0.00002558402,0.00014860157,0.00009560937,0.00009817513,0.0001676128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991422,0.000032557004,0.000076958335,0.000102336366,0.000047541198,0.00059837603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000119102995,0.00007125261,0.00010246152,0.00015347928,0.00010818101,0.000047200047,0.00021169263,0.00005279,0.00022550422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003870229,0.000056802117,0.00004635542,0.000106077205,0.0002118769,0.00019358171,0.00000899864,0.0006713301,0.000019305427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027953552,0.00005362911,0.040638678,0.00003704085,0.000014734505,0.0026230423,0.0011404828,0.000002778203,0.49857423,0.41996136,0.013111625,0.023814451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012072999,0.0004954302,0.042583503,0.00010817161,0.00004116889,0.003763046,0.00004686386,0.00012152734,0.06787482,0.7511084,0.13203152,0.00061822566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000649255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040554004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4306994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001376201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029044383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29166326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968262798","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2007.0000","title":"Zombies, Epiphenomenalism, and Physicalist Theories of Consciousness","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Zombie; Physicalism; Consciousness; Materialism; Monster; Philosophy; Genius; Creatures; Epistemology; Eliminative materialism; Philosophy of mind; Art history; Psychoanalysis; Literature; Art; Metaphysics; History; Psychology; Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.030447840434565845,"score_gpt":0.2588770683027151,"score_spread":0.2284292278681493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968262798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94766927,0.000411889,0.0005544835,0.023984658,0.0010803139,0.00021003273,0.0002663757,0.000017309318,0.025805641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977099,0.000012071865,0.00009046168,0.0015804996,0.00045814787,0.0000014760445,0.0000016651054,0.000014851457,0.00013098058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987338,0.00009189868,0.00050045236,0.00016184729,0.00027637932,0.00023560635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869096,0.0002610771,0.00039660113,0.00016481668,0.00021765674,0.00026886407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022817717,0.00012169777,0.00025113876,0.00032905402,0.00018736307,0.00005256706,0.0002933696,0.00004835827,0.000094594805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050852966,0.000111120215,0.000056545785,0.0004186568,0.001950715,0.00018890887,0.000020434569,0.00028680434,0.0000042514803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000873326,0.000036231955,0.00033021288,0.000032634878,0.0000070208134,0.00007917438,0.00021805897,0.0000052403257,0.05576207,0.9422707,0.001082647,0.00016728521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042866712,0.0001644555,0.0007740989,0.000070355956,0.000018152996,0.00006308517,0.000036432073,0.0000060379803,0.05177069,0.93901443,0.0075200694,0.00013353182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057081674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008703714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05004055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052859075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043488268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71874905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969463755","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.897485","title":"Reid's First Principle #7","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Epistemology; Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.023233660878637336,"score_gpt":0.27233084964279186,"score_spread":0.24909718876415451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969463755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050985273,0.00028649057,0.0006886118,0.015976764,0.0021064633,0.00007175397,0.000011582871,0.0000107794285,0.92986226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967209,0.000001526144,0.00017201915,0.0014464149,0.0014670321,0.0000015173586,6.107939e-7,0.000012793374,0.00017719675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885577,0.00009952653,0.00032439097,0.00015857979,0.00017422363,0.00038750877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819326,0.00011865299,0.00017176934,0.00029255592,0.00011432345,0.0011094058],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063310727,0.00011532706,0.00020072349,0.00021539371,0.00019238821,0.00003604663,0.0005724383,0.000092023365,0.002067879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029456176,0.0000975122,0.00012732933,0.00024500565,0.00037030317,0.00012029067,0.00001295237,0.0002957101,0.00046058674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015493886,0.000016265749,0.0011660595,0.000004055575,0.000019129006,0.00010810513,0.00032180845,0.000008868411,0.000011383792,0.99619937,0.0011016718,0.0010278162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036303763,0.00028125782,0.0054633827,0.000039396447,0.000014907351,0.00019892534,0.000011662848,0.000012845108,0.000034843262,0.8223918,0.17105757,0.00013035367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004059633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009066627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94573563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007122733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018512913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970306474","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2011.0028","title":"Description, Disagreement, and Fictional Names","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Authorship Attribution and Profiling","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Fictional universe; Philosophy; Proper noun; Epistemology; Emptiness; Linguistics; Narrative","score_opus":0.08777744241595391,"score_gpt":0.22824566053096923,"score_spread":0.1404682181150153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970306474","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16615416,0.004706227,0.76019794,0.020047812,0.0050970474,0.00022678137,0.000039855455,0.000056796318,0.04347339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912751,0.000008940269,0.008019003,0.00045726672,0.00017893872,4.5729422e-7,6.216836e-7,0.0000030512983,0.000056652112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994356,0.000038054222,0.00019199192,0.00008669986,0.000103548526,0.00014409401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918234,0.000012739349,0.00011229037,0.000099057186,0.00013729317,0.0004562494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026893846,0.00006263198,0.0000830148,0.00018773958,0.00014957541,0.000062347004,0.0002753473,0.000034943696,0.00012434035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004236426,0.000057152225,0.00004202258,0.00013651108,0.00006446252,0.00047612513,0.000015151886,0.00013038928,0.000012691863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005975641,0.000011568551,0.043484665,0.000008084731,0.00003245981,0.000089726884,0.0025311923,0.0000028201896,0.000058288446,0.9477259,0.0019730078,0.0040763407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060616795,0.00032598304,0.109291136,0.000097635566,0.00002348311,0.00073414796,0.00012456003,0.0005784827,0.0006579419,0.8586191,0.028622687,0.00031866189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002360905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003434619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8251209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047769827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030503306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23306002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985419471","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2012.0014","title":"Why the Basic Structure?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Constitution; Scope (computer science); Duty; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Sociology; Politics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05762212956430192,"score_gpt":0.298501507878754,"score_spread":0.2408793783144521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985419471","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060922533,0.0033937006,0.00005874559,0.46904072,0.005218839,0.00017089433,0.000066678855,0.0000142077615,0.46111366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759096,0.000011243356,0.00004664683,0.016681729,0.0072901137,3.7285432e-7,4.966463e-7,0.000008961384,0.00005084615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985823,0.00024720328,0.00021822468,0.000054713706,0.00032713494,0.0005704038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978966,0.00020946331,0.00011423358,0.00014119997,0.00017780894,0.0014606763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009346254,0.0000864816,0.0001303657,0.00012128894,0.0007800707,0.00006882343,0.00048329897,0.00012502748,0.0006296585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007316577,0.00006038972,0.00011939129,0.00022714534,0.00080530415,0.00039139204,0.000008110626,0.0005422569,0.00003220725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026031598,0.0000053826766,0.0016404714,0.0000034304971,0.000018754154,0.000010105769,0.0059820684,0.0000020215002,0.0000069552443,0.9811159,0.010980224,0.00023208752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006368808,0.00001694788,0.0009486675,0.000013787829,0.000019050713,0.000016183125,0.0002819812,2.4786735e-7,0.000019065516,0.58594805,0.41260764,0.00006472517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009476532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021743067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.914987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017439382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011644424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997847719","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0030","title":"Modality, Individuation, and the Ontology of Art","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Aesthetic Perception and Analysis","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Object (grammar); Product (mathematics); Individuation; Modality (human–computer interaction); Contrast (vision); Sound (geography); Musical; Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Visual arts; Art; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Psychoanalysis; Acoustics","score_opus":0.05976143593382885,"score_gpt":0.24799015714363537,"score_spread":0.18822872120980652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997847719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9380099,0.00014986546,0.00023982777,0.04983353,0.000102018865,0.00004971576,0.000010258601,0.0000020475347,0.011602831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977728,0.00006643315,0.0000419168,0.0019278341,0.00007083234,3.9611388e-7,2.5465704e-7,0.0000031743818,0.00011636442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933505,0.000129572,0.00024110718,0.0000654856,0.00013646318,0.00009230779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942344,0.00003598045,0.0001842372,0.00009434213,0.000071713366,0.00019026505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002211043,0.00004964271,0.00016206379,0.00016903541,0.00014356016,0.00000877918,0.00017083874,0.00002886835,0.00016187731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025738814,0.000033181906,0.00007845367,0.00015130868,0.0007973258,0.00007119338,0.0000068561044,0.00011284596,0.000011289752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021429479,0.0001372082,0.0736162,0.000039536935,0.00008137317,0.0008045301,0.022416195,0.00044530508,0.010155272,0.8696236,0.015381343,0.007085148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006832863,0.0004914935,0.12658729,0.00010123411,0.000257695,0.008971804,0.00040318133,0.0009193308,0.0022562284,0.8191969,0.033500027,0.00048196682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033395088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086378516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059762888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017240254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002570473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.293778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000106372","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.913825","title":"Skookumchuck, Kiidk’yaas, Gibbard: normativity, meaning, and idealization (critical notice of Allan Gibbard <i>Meaning and Normativity</i>)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Idealization; Notice; Sociology; Focus (optics); Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01755610275980648,"score_gpt":0.2671049473603443,"score_spread":0.2495488446005378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000106372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27897808,0.0011875923,0.013652601,0.019718047,0.0018092222,0.00034334918,0.00012386889,0.00003654144,0.6841507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99769354,0.0000148175195,0.0006688633,0.0010751483,0.0005077736,0.0000017519648,0.0000026449643,0.000021384038,0.000014076865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977689,0.00047586925,0.00066733354,0.00026132926,0.00034399636,0.00048258583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973747,0.00059727865,0.0003590886,0.00025794964,0.00027864167,0.0011323368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014030103,0.00023369225,0.00048735563,0.000364053,0.00025352798,0.00009110139,0.00035340464,0.00017038544,0.0001939011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010840042,0.00021629546,0.00009364152,0.00029255403,0.0010717482,0.00047711824,0.000053313604,0.00044935386,0.000018410961],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003817595,0.00003181887,0.0025359865,0.00007548322,0.000043102926,0.00005058937,0.0034029344,0.000013540742,0.00018498553,0.99082553,0.00027535547,0.002522504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092975586,0.0006916511,0.008063654,0.00027501243,0.00011067873,0.0005487795,0.00019382995,0.0003417955,0.00021955176,0.9848913,0.0033854705,0.00034851133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005808182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001050668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7187155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052189658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015043169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8820273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002816358","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.897475","title":"The extension of color sensations: Reid, Stewart, and Fearn","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Appeal; Aesthetics; Dilemma; Perception; Extension (predicate logic); Philosophy; Doctrine; Epistemology; Psychology; Theology; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.032267235084320556,"score_gpt":0.1964125667909303,"score_spread":0.16414533170660975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002816358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5473372,0.005698202,0.00010955259,0.07597081,0.0049184314,0.00033987864,0.000059498976,0.000017593336,0.36554885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998188,0.000019163794,0.00005138957,0.00040874895,0.00082508166,4.625897e-7,2.8280297e-7,0.0000052745772,0.00050155167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992981,0.000068486486,0.00026998052,0.00007473032,0.0001528653,0.00013586113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998945,0.00017360905,0.00019653607,0.00012858635,0.00027814202,0.00027810468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004859019,0.00006544324,0.00013785978,0.000114717666,0.0006576957,0.000067194655,0.00016541647,0.000024477169,0.00006182027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028997654,0.00004256831,0.000057844234,0.000044128617,0.0006422832,0.00014798305,0.000007014507,0.00013690071,0.000008209006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011827573,0.0000066269063,0.000057519606,0.000008965655,0.000010448141,0.000007906505,0.0043090666,0.000014343764,0.000081093414,0.9901925,0.0035780317,0.001721709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021085504,0.00036571105,0.00030671048,0.00005815074,0.00002148235,0.000031511987,0.0003543403,0.00013679883,0.000026876098,0.38092336,0.61746913,0.00009504493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061420194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005170054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6138911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039555565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000168332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.505853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008347657","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.897484","title":"Reid on the priority of natural language","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Natural language; sort; Natural (archaeology); Linguistics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; History; Chemistry","score_opus":0.023103085277288254,"score_gpt":0.21912440628610946,"score_spread":0.19602132100882122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008347657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71276116,0.0003825047,0.000043166863,0.11903503,0.0063536176,0.00016671086,0.000058129273,0.000010936855,0.1611887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951613,8.587912e-7,0.000045042547,0.0007035547,0.0039154775,2.8966372e-7,0.0000016005525,0.000009581385,0.00016229523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993487,0.00006652544,0.00025031547,0.000055690136,0.0001565182,0.000122275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990637,0.00015279003,0.0002627359,0.00015508704,0.00024852288,0.000117201314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003825713,0.000073749696,0.00014419894,0.00013785266,0.00014859962,0.00005380652,0.00021599744,0.000024079389,0.00042145763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009514015,0.000049747792,0.000084471925,0.000024007471,0.00013908825,0.00006379681,0.000004826875,0.00020891767,0.000021820642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006912944,0.000006371865,0.00012836246,0.000010978422,0.000026898655,0.00001103054,0.015869694,0.000002903245,0.000030348088,0.9829306,0.00044200066,0.0005339174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053557835,0.00035851618,0.0023087398,0.0002754536,0.00008683821,0.000025927646,0.0029513352,0.00022515796,0.00048320118,0.959894,0.032637008,0.00021821861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050274446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021795409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2824001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049228696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016085287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016435477","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.923240","title":"Justification is potential knowledge","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; University of Aberdeen","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.06459974620442645,"score_gpt":0.25092442753209715,"score_spread":0.18632468132767072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016435477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06464401,0.0027759436,0.0010111408,0.036684476,0.013450845,0.00017725622,0.00010269582,0.000026229844,0.8811274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99007386,0.000008864192,0.00006738854,0.0012725915,0.006308422,7.0338456e-7,0.000004141747,0.0000147491055,0.002249281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926186,0.00007970703,0.00028881873,0.00009225913,0.00009398969,0.00018338162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880195,0.000038279297,0.00020419498,0.00015127617,0.00046350784,0.00034076924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036501748,0.000095861666,0.0001823295,0.00021425176,0.000302871,0.00009140609,0.00021786914,0.00006291113,0.0006192601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069387876,0.00008699922,0.00014273108,0.000029317773,0.00037400765,0.00016401705,0.0000047803737,0.00027159502,0.00018299915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050945946,0.000019056757,0.000054358243,0.00004030841,0.00004608998,0.000010525288,0.017517244,0.000004744519,0.000055697306,0.9551513,0.023321439,0.0037740998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021513017,0.000109123226,0.00013175608,0.000041621443,0.000067328445,0.000020637346,0.00031084052,0.00003780501,0.00008168622,0.29421893,0.70464903,0.00011609426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076281594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00881708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9254299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046019777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038647105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67804646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021214418","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2010.0005","title":"Recovering What Is Said With Empty Names","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Systems, Applications & Products in Data Processing (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Referent; Philosophy; Meaning (existential); Superman; Sentence; Epistemology; Linguistics; Value (mathematics); Existentialism; Original meaning; Proper noun; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.01631989699004337,"score_gpt":0.25683419391144446,"score_spread":0.24051429692140108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021214418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6289839,0.0009313032,0.000102915015,0.02565111,0.0045177275,0.00011127351,0.000025668674,0.000012810582,0.33966327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99586475,0.000011104941,0.00032961133,0.0026280866,0.0010404807,0.0000015750674,5.2656816e-7,0.000016863469,0.00010699085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889845,0.000045235218,0.00026418702,0.00019380398,0.00019842394,0.00039991317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982598,0.00006887024,0.00017282425,0.00030445118,0.00013866437,0.001055421],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036078278,0.00014376726,0.00020994073,0.00021798676,0.00016274817,0.00014410815,0.0005119803,0.0001152764,0.003797554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053261647,0.0001095791,0.00010365933,0.00025847435,0.0005107938,0.0005811871,0.000010635772,0.00064959686,0.00016634518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087911256,0.00003334185,0.002884468,0.000007374444,0.00008555491,0.00073313754,0.002397846,0.0000027677454,0.0004353298,0.97765964,0.00090104085,0.014771581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068784144,0.00057336787,0.0051638763,0.00015701047,0.000038823397,0.0011941552,0.0002512507,0.0000039661613,0.0005570581,0.9532304,0.037826553,0.0003157372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050373987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001915904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36688083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000449514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035069298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021515381","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.996118","title":"On Okin’s critique of libertarianism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Libertarianism; Argument (complex analysis); Dilemma; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Medicine","score_opus":0.0586692116165563,"score_gpt":0.3054623686890096,"score_spread":0.2467931570724533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021515381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77814674,0.0026547627,0.00006887665,0.12187231,0.0011534344,0.0002723818,0.000014967145,0.00002002666,0.095796496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972741,0.000015256298,0.00066442863,0.0015079115,0.00042698646,0.0000010661671,0.0000010177675,0.000011954142,0.00009726177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992276,0.00002411391,0.00030517223,0.00009531022,0.0001674531,0.00018037592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829,0.000030021114,0.0001625581,0.00023210916,0.00048188353,0.0008034128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027984567,0.000080336176,0.00027362848,0.00043154933,0.000027169763,0.000005028569,0.00011728864,0.00009363015,0.00003998894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012820002,0.00006496282,0.00007723089,0.00014799788,0.00013353146,0.00006036381,0.0000045455763,0.00032337787,0.000013553371],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008395169,0.00023377722,0.020547573,0.0003754579,0.00024228512,0.003356167,0.001971262,0.000032253374,0.0010339248,0.8519484,0.10934564,0.010073779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021332318,0.004608355,0.009430733,0.0005234319,0.000068705565,0.0011960829,0.00026446948,0.0000031245663,0.0072141597,0.9206597,0.053744156,0.00015383291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012135982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032221182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21912737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014623543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002300912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40817192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025188704","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2011.0030","title":"Richard Gaskin, The Unity of the Proposition. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press2008. Pp. xv + 455.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0852654655467508,"score_gpt":0.19857695577186912,"score_spread":0.11331149022511833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025188704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27567238,0.005260492,0.0000657783,0.052157786,0.0019478208,0.0005971964,0.0004140089,0.000020863343,0.6638637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99776787,0.00012788383,0.000026395239,0.00091774855,0.00073054706,2.2887072e-7,0.0000010979711,0.000012726749,0.0004154988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990841,0.00015887778,0.0002558691,0.000101839054,0.0001901254,0.00020917044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986819,0.000072362236,0.0003042352,0.00024545996,0.00027031978,0.00042574137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036414256,0.0001344845,0.0001976527,0.000103664795,0.0006511221,0.000050634233,0.0005625198,0.00007734379,0.0005713753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006371792,0.00008124141,0.00015579398,0.00008322136,0.0011447087,0.00019595373,0.00004413302,0.00058029575,0.0000017220542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051233368,0.000021404903,0.00026937746,0.000017233933,0.0000796277,0.00002396939,0.009796064,0.0000021981111,0.000006005226,0.9875752,0.0016670299,0.0004906808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003026716,0.00015321604,0.0011777419,0.000097843375,0.00008826781,0.00003333946,0.00054566294,0.0000044301455,0.000052102718,0.8044752,0.1929658,0.00010371871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051564695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010500237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7220955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052359184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077149086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7795074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026241495","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.944814","title":"Lexical norms, language comprehension, and the epistemology of testimony","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Victoria","keywords":"Comprehension; Underwriting; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.035859880952245314,"score_gpt":0.23333721370638028,"score_spread":0.19747733275413495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026241495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7071772,0.008460103,0.00022248813,0.056212444,0.0032207868,0.00029506232,0.000083732724,0.0000160307,0.22431214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965599,0.000012602798,0.0001011014,0.0018402511,0.0012085953,6.379879e-7,0.0000018707632,0.0000102346485,0.0002648139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910074,0.0002071138,0.00035332562,0.000078625766,0.00009827605,0.00016190388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867123,0.00043599907,0.00026388105,0.00015650244,0.00025045767,0.00022190317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005827216,0.000098056786,0.0003588461,0.000118713695,0.00020643648,0.000031700507,0.00019785049,0.0000602394,0.00011590373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025218632,0.00006172201,0.00011101339,0.000024460353,0.0022494786,0.00006990252,0.000012653663,0.00031384922,0.000007512204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027365359,0.000009556688,0.0005708353,0.000045064648,0.000047930393,0.000022940098,0.011875101,0.0000037909595,0.000030262323,0.9850883,0.0015204606,0.00075838435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002106303,0.00048763823,0.0017609079,0.00015062359,0.00015862343,0.000262317,0.0016140543,0.00009020976,0.000074263866,0.8495161,0.14356776,0.00021120015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003965433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016555166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2893827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013792075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017426473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92381716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029616281","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2010.0007","title":"The Explanatory Structure of the Transcendental Deduction and a Cognitive Interpretation of the First Critique","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Psychologism; Transcendental number; Sensibility; Articulation (sociology); Transcendental philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.010484339825473197,"score_gpt":0.21264243316530515,"score_spread":0.20215809333983195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029616281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9714659,0.0006732297,0.0000110831625,0.019506047,0.0021980337,0.00014933436,0.00022661658,0.0000015258513,0.005768228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99896413,0.000010329948,0.0000014442566,0.0005445116,0.00046043523,6.9119136e-7,4.785845e-7,0.000007721112,0.000010244552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993858,0.00007327892,0.00024532838,0.000056528184,0.00014824481,0.000090849106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914896,0.00014672917,0.00023424152,0.000102991966,0.00027673054,0.00009036021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019719331,0.000076554854,0.000110798996,0.000056809396,0.00044804267,0.000041523657,0.00024856173,0.00006126675,0.00010070028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013500058,0.000038436825,0.000121008015,0.000032852193,0.0014371666,0.00010928888,0.000007818628,0.00061893056,1.6350224e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004296537,0.000009058643,0.00021889305,0.000040577466,0.00006669827,0.0000018507833,0.01859176,0.0000028686445,0.0005473602,0.97960365,0.000030851053,0.0008434809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025102822,0.00006809279,0.0013987453,0.00024763416,0.000072693794,0.000055966568,0.001792949,0.000019145002,0.0018026454,0.99242,0.0018073112,0.00006376116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041663193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.070668995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07025236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014147973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026779252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9462889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044703139","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0061","title":"Promises to the Self","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Epistemology; Reflexivity; Negativity effect; Philosophy; General interest; Contemporary philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.06033349264577125,"score_gpt":0.24681202057070065,"score_spread":0.1864785279249294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044703139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0884015,0.0020620828,0.00002838957,0.34081352,0.004390936,0.0003727448,0.000061144776,0.000028871673,0.5638408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835891,0.0000073061988,0.00010898655,0.010830958,0.004498324,8.7435325e-7,7.1607735e-7,0.0000081243115,0.0009555863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934125,0.000051635354,0.00022290368,0.00006953461,0.00011368836,0.00020097815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905944,0.000038014925,0.00011445273,0.00014777016,0.0002597529,0.00038059393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002937321,0.00008921128,0.00015726867,0.00013565247,0.0003476375,0.000113861504,0.00030724434,0.00003290393,0.000200354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069316724,0.000058754853,0.00011391111,0.000038395858,0.00013617711,0.00012388306,0.0000034509262,0.000267839,0.00007613588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073550113,0.000018841603,0.00005120744,0.000008333297,0.000045522982,0.000059733353,0.032826785,0.00001002077,0.000011799367,0.92982584,0.034915544,0.0022190015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116956275,0.0002699081,0.0003082773,0.00003277487,0.00003245004,0.000026994263,0.00037615406,9.748733e-7,0.00002735623,0.22546482,0.77326053,0.00008280954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000553311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01795149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8951876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045998753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005385844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045315299","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.981932","title":"Representationalism, perceptual distortion and the limits of phenomenal concepts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Falsity; Direct and indirect realism; Epistemology; Perception; Distortion (music); Counterexample; Philosophy; Content (measure theory); Psychology; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07938908558787802,"score_gpt":0.33832631235703764,"score_spread":0.25893722676915965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045315299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5985427,0.0024170668,0.00030160937,0.021555478,0.0014280432,0.00016507864,0.00004460833,0.000004240621,0.3755412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99875283,0.0000034265065,0.000046663787,0.00055260054,0.0005716665,0.0000017621355,0.0000014024924,0.0000052125047,0.000064455155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990043,0.00020178051,0.0003113043,0.00010461979,0.00022008293,0.0001578955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987041,0.00015459118,0.00021754958,0.00013756499,0.00021426818,0.000571978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007079482,0.00007339556,0.0001760891,0.000097599324,0.00007644695,0.000017489716,0.00024919657,0.000044818466,0.00030033998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029256058,0.0000487501,0.00007052072,0.00014857984,0.0017006424,0.000121679834,0.000009193489,0.000162516,0.000014388289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015503605,0.000013107214,0.0010219977,0.0000020670423,0.00003064824,0.000028737706,0.0077327294,0.00000968507,0.000018668125,0.98973715,0.0006408923,0.00060929323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017876434,0.00021297511,0.0071788016,0.000019016148,0.0000302801,0.00017501978,0.0009770881,0.000009663142,0.000021271231,0.9879055,0.0016061921,0.000076543576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006076812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017136263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40021014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050450202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002688402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6266088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045543924","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0042","title":"Causal Essentialism versus the Zombie Worlds","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Zombie; Physicalism; Epistemology; Consciousness; Philosophy; Supervenience; Qualia; Falsity; Philosophy of mind; Metaphysics; Essentialism; Computer science","score_opus":0.03382292534503098,"score_gpt":0.2989595447810922,"score_spread":0.26513661943606126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045543924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0493258,0.0012724879,0.00015199513,0.09894002,0.0068917824,0.000119500306,0.000019844167,0.00001285657,0.8432657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947669,0.0000035785984,0.00003548171,0.0029250707,0.0021096715,8.817549e-7,8.422601e-7,0.000008368551,0.00014919142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871415,0.00013525599,0.0003185492,0.0001534557,0.00023681167,0.0004417972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847424,0.00013512853,0.00016669734,0.00031255043,0.000113229966,0.0007981264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048219823,0.00013498338,0.00018422896,0.00018784194,0.0002592807,0.00006948365,0.00076267385,0.000089052846,0.0015092259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012532328,0.000092481525,0.00015998188,0.0004026614,0.00050968403,0.00013582213,0.000008449699,0.00044911765,0.0001954389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096674536,0.000022660362,0.000036968195,7.191729e-7,0.00003805723,0.00040876202,0.0006057342,0.0000049731852,0.000040664752,0.9925462,0.0036091472,0.0025894423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083786045,0.0004671926,0.0032961902,0.000022369244,0.000046811256,0.00018456628,0.00005535769,0.0000029925345,0.00004898737,0.97300565,0.021891212,0.00014082185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042680482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058564194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9454411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078184785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031804416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046309195","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0009","title":"The Social Dimensions of Modesty","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Character (mathematics); Natural (archaeology); Character traits; Psychology; Social psychology; Simple (philosophy); Trait; Philosophy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.07944100043389908,"score_gpt":0.24506652677599153,"score_spread":0.16562552634209243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046309195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44258907,0.0031542757,0.000020931217,0.08699867,0.0026180074,0.00016293701,0.00018080804,0.000013288425,0.464262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99746245,0.000055019915,0.000008764459,0.0005803566,0.0017242894,5.8439997e-7,7.3565724e-7,0.000011442207,0.00015633838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991872,0.00006168779,0.0003256129,0.00005545965,0.00018654543,0.00018353267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890316,0.00013653924,0.00021143569,0.00010602603,0.00038043252,0.00026243474],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003005894,0.00008251331,0.00017513386,0.00011334707,0.0013403101,0.000029193367,0.0002704096,0.00004857453,0.00015963125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000101730075,0.000047911435,0.00017812634,0.000037911796,0.0014314152,0.00009682924,0.000010798926,0.00036098136,0.000011364771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012263869,0.000011006461,0.000021046886,0.000004219561,0.000040167437,0.00005118287,0.0076664807,0.0000046265,0.000014732011,0.9909424,0.0010760357,0.00015584716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001587535,0.0000746915,0.00007124503,0.000021341908,0.00001598678,0.00003626941,0.00020348113,0.000007658092,0.000017899361,0.9180713,0.08125698,0.000064361426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074673846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00429234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5548734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033215383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068203034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047242378","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2007.0012","title":"Pirates, Kings and Reasons to Ad: Moral Motivation and the Role of Sanctions in Locke's Moral Theory","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sanctions; Natural law; Hedonism; Pleasure; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Moral psychology; Moral disengagement; Normative ethics; Moral philosophy; Moral reasoning; Law; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.019874559541167236,"score_gpt":0.25378337560688335,"score_spread":0.23390881606571612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047242378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85499984,0.0025452652,0.00034626917,0.0142262345,0.00021709882,0.00019652346,0.000042762436,0.0000036923684,0.12742232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999002,0.000018599241,0.00017593076,0.00054519647,0.00020803111,5.778587e-7,4.6546162e-7,0.000003035281,0.00004616354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993912,0.00009375483,0.00018523559,0.000053221855,0.000108828455,0.0001677684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991576,0.00023165016,0.000105844905,0.00004448007,0.000120749966,0.0003396599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008602347,0.00004961254,0.00011657845,0.00017484228,0.00022880409,0.000021911472,0.00008669214,0.00003534945,0.000023284283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004211632,0.00003993381,0.000027976928,0.000213258,0.0011195637,0.00011203557,0.0000061532974,0.00012301576,5.1195644e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030404206,0.0000034896768,0.057859626,0.0000013865484,0.0000072761322,0.00000616469,0.0016086954,0.000009673316,0.0000096085805,0.9392173,0.000040675317,0.0012056907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068162626,0.000109716486,0.15242621,0.000120806915,0.00003925623,0.000040017607,0.0048241476,0.000004075696,0.000052381016,0.7752286,0.06632672,0.00014639663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019768635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039181475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16398866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008855706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001065327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9867588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049669090","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.905251","title":"Debunking enactivism: a critical notice of Hutto and Myin’s Radicalizing Enactivism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Embodied and Extended Cognition","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Enactivism; Epistemology; Internalism and externalism; Notice; Action (physics); Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Autopoiesis; Law","score_opus":0.03618419868820575,"score_gpt":0.2586043134393586,"score_spread":0.22242011475115284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049669090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59782875,0.0010149385,0.0068549234,0.02872521,0.0026699458,0.00033909603,0.00006073126,0.00005095241,0.3624555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99738646,0.000012853026,0.00044651062,0.0016338427,0.00049315416,9.227564e-7,2.7770272e-7,0.00001914128,0.000006819149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998711,0.00018286539,0.00034394927,0.00019074552,0.00025462758,0.0003168208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824554,0.00062820927,0.00019289312,0.00012646655,0.00012490973,0.0006819726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036790015,0.00013044753,0.00027032208,0.00035937942,0.00019566258,0.00006160995,0.00019563777,0.000081967766,0.000037757738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027474086,0.00012291702,0.00008803928,0.0001636183,0.0003434327,0.00038408558,0.000015344684,0.0003777216,0.0000064132932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007432158,0.00006735052,0.00050257094,0.00014730047,0.000022759092,0.00035584022,0.0013388181,0.00001737246,0.05609823,0.92543954,0.00024645322,0.015689455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000870293,0.0004998943,0.0004981433,0.00050229166,0.00009094848,0.0009856931,0.00008741174,0.0005415574,0.05639797,0.93575436,0.0034715424,0.00029988727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030795878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019768352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39955777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006513095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026313416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.501241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066844139","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2006.0016","title":"Disquotationalism, Truth and Justification: The Pragmatist's Wrong Turn","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Coherence theory of truth; Nothing; Pragmatic theory of truth; Logical truth; Predicate (mathematical logic); Proposition; Truth condition; Tautology (logic); Pragmatism; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.023905739594185536,"score_gpt":0.19812844517018435,"score_spread":0.1742227055759988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066844139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14024916,0.008538629,0.00006708489,0.05236547,0.0050922763,0.0002625678,0.00026928607,0.000023618528,0.7931319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948076,0.000006297201,0.000043224518,0.0005480373,0.0037236048,0.0000023936898,0.0000065349404,0.000009774008,0.00085252523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919647,0.000040404917,0.00029419875,0.00010394473,0.00020082318,0.00016414824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991446,0.00007900512,0.0002227,0.00012883484,0.00021122213,0.00021363892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024858603,0.000099439436,0.00012647847,0.00020270675,0.0008722451,0.00023465097,0.00025415956,0.000020686097,0.00038463043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041461655,0.00007019725,0.00006481475,0.000053129876,0.0009029932,0.00035052007,0.0000052511305,0.00016045873,0.000020942314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028960026,0.000007746511,0.000103465,0.000009688928,0.00000927883,0.000026935013,0.0045314906,0.000014308483,0.00000581791,0.9854208,0.009471313,0.00039620735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021349653,0.000045977584,0.0033013243,0.000033849145,0.000043076892,0.000120599376,0.00059730804,0.000029020775,0.000004701143,0.48461497,0.5108557,0.00013999833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020619086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017445948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85455847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008579389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041562523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97352487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067996822","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.897481","title":"Reid's response to Hume's perceptual relativity argument","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Perception; Appeal; Epistemology; Philosophy; Nothing; Ideal (ethics); Principal (computer security); Psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02499908837347552,"score_gpt":0.28001693473761924,"score_spread":0.2550178463641437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067996822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63956547,0.00009878081,0.0009003566,0.03940435,0.0015615379,0.00013628339,0.000021822092,0.000012300862,0.3182991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99504626,5.0916015e-7,0.00029279612,0.0033271497,0.0009501615,0.0000031422312,5.366597e-7,0.000016908421,0.00036252645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979317,0.00063126965,0.00040174281,0.00025092132,0.00028492598,0.00049940555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714106,0.00032740948,0.00015573185,0.0003860768,0.0001421134,0.0018476087],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021078808,0.00016366034,0.00027309768,0.00038518987,0.00021523582,0.000046264176,0.00058722525,0.00011995422,0.0018525769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009556844,0.0001431948,0.00014007473,0.00036247293,0.00038447732,0.00014744772,0.00002365059,0.00043283688,0.0008832974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047631474,0.000040778075,0.0006611357,0.0000024766869,0.000031884643,0.00020926193,0.0028210229,0.000020279675,0.00084092823,0.9896321,0.0025394922,0.0027243008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007715263,0.0017201626,0.03494213,0.000079736725,0.00003156706,0.00026205333,0.00012750375,0.0000056977533,0.00015359235,0.8855542,0.07603517,0.00031666787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036833668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035019443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35548082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019169052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029428795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069466861","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2006.0002","title":"Benefits, Intentions, and the Principle of Fairness","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Economic Justice; Moral obligation; Law and economics; Set (abstract data type); Public good; Economics; Sociology; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.038746418038848145,"score_gpt":0.28549262075136494,"score_spread":0.2467462027125168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069466861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3950975,0.0068768854,0.00014682334,0.17627047,0.0011642859,0.00029674402,0.00008711312,0.000011179885,0.420049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858046,0.00004928692,0.00005759604,0.00039302767,0.0008485444,7.571235e-7,5.4369366e-7,0.0000048085594,0.000064965476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990037,0.00015178954,0.0003030904,0.00005803553,0.0002711254,0.00021227496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891585,0.00019483463,0.00016342317,0.00008883581,0.00031123986,0.0003258097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001068176,0.000060117487,0.0001661529,0.00012248785,0.00038093657,0.00003966689,0.00024955577,0.0000791809,0.000042690408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005394291,0.00004355588,0.00010155521,0.00016389533,0.0016187376,0.0001422907,0.000010422595,0.00023877954,0.0000021824085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009893349,0.00000708901,0.0012302708,0.000008419888,0.00001140155,0.0000047886015,0.00059847307,0.000016170272,0.0000021697551,0.9978699,0.00011234941,0.0001290474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039663326,0.000024033958,0.004861835,0.000057380472,0.00002738835,0.000009650795,0.0001701346,0.0000024009385,0.000022340679,0.97569644,0.018677633,0.00005412457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016928287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027079275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60348296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006233525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009139962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069587569","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.977835","title":"Kant on conic sections","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conic section; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.03580878565759277,"score_gpt":0.20249520829678969,"score_spread":0.16668642263919692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069587569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03441412,0.00032987792,0.00001478287,0.00807023,0.0045400932,0.000054997185,0.00003371226,0.000013078871,0.95252913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916022,0.000003955837,0.0000130193785,0.0023666462,0.004834236,0.0000010409028,0.0000011487988,0.000012772192,0.0011649858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918514,0.000043790464,0.00025026713,0.000108949134,0.00017765786,0.00023419388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989118,0.00004177921,0.00015274184,0.00016183752,0.00018377921,0.0005480824],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024675613,0.000108890286,0.00017571123,0.0004975943,0.0006267015,0.00010609159,0.00028095837,0.000026828246,0.0010548165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059267673,0.00009355087,0.00013794098,0.000050557243,0.00047526052,0.00020271262,0.000003924891,0.0002573352,0.00024041385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005652044,0.000015683656,0.0000329826,0.0000058158607,0.000016693533,0.000023685445,0.004013157,0.000027171855,0.000011841631,0.9800699,0.015398244,0.00037921092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020714603,0.00030750618,0.0000938059,0.00004471818,0.00001688189,0.000029992108,0.000122007725,0.00001469165,0.000012992744,0.16948357,0.8295489,0.00011779982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014301459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030595103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95718807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016743962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005249177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069611010","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2006.0004","title":"Revelation and Normativity in Visual Experience","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Color perception and design","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Magyarország Kormánya","keywords":"Perception; Color vision; Psychology; Point (geometry); Color discrimination; Task (project management); Visual perception; Notice; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Geometry; Computer science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.029688733845200897,"score_gpt":0.3039974524939578,"score_spread":0.27430871864875694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069611010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9681764,0.00019270623,0.00026785882,0.0009583588,0.00025852124,0.00004412286,0.0000025576464,0.000002242336,0.030097192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930155,0.0000013119611,0.00008330406,0.0002515146,0.00022867315,0.0000014092926,7.9572527e-7,0.000004094263,0.00012737274],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994729,0.000068307476,0.00021779147,0.000063163796,0.000059049722,0.000118777716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963856,0.000024818759,0.000086724634,0.00004903818,0.000040331677,0.00016050905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016360404,0.000051670777,0.00009486672,0.00028418234,0.00004289062,0.000018303486,0.00005120601,0.00004857071,0.0007548673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018639044,0.000051649688,0.0000239246,0.00013202522,0.00006320712,0.00014045347,0.0000022052632,0.00012333994,0.000032110365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018839826,0.00017123709,0.82487756,0.000021948443,0.000024241817,0.0011320992,0.028630028,0.00009293654,0.0019546945,0.10194601,0.016040245,0.024920592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054530706,0.00011536556,0.9772725,0.000023456472,0.000003390176,0.00017435329,0.00032558906,0.000032476684,0.0000151890845,0.01649612,0.004906572,0.00008968144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004395505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013439774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15239494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006878762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009720794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82652676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080890053","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2007.0011","title":"Public Reason and Moral Compromise","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Politics; Compromise; Epistemology; Criticism; Doctrine; Philosophy; Public reason; Law; Sociology; Political science; Democracy; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.14590508185590634,"score_gpt":0.3165623061178905,"score_spread":0.17065722426198415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080890053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17480792,0.0017070406,0.00012209945,0.17338255,0.0010309763,0.00012299522,0.000019382103,0.000016271637,0.6487908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964529,0.000025310845,0.00027450352,0.0012966259,0.0018703943,1.9177914e-7,6.489584e-7,0.000008153108,0.00007124897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877965,0.00009759652,0.00026485656,0.00008958446,0.00026982604,0.00049848785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712497,0.00015958633,0.00011144398,0.000086304535,0.0002457937,0.002271874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017441859,0.000082425155,0.00016079888,0.000259738,0.0005050917,0.00010097539,0.00024362808,0.00014516852,0.00009866068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008517093,0.00008049024,0.00007146847,0.00020658861,0.0008892026,0.00032382566,0.000008333223,0.00040969916,0.000012389418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007936922,0.000009017472,0.0036875538,0.000006168564,0.000012799697,0.00015846583,0.0019149028,3.1245278e-7,0.0000058276282,0.9920187,0.0006064217,0.0015718947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002624642,0.0000746305,0.0042839064,0.00003626716,0.000013848057,0.000036839803,0.00041440126,0.000002054947,0.0000128275,0.9277796,0.066967666,0.00011550591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007195072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031299178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.821645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017943504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001228482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083102510","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2008.0005","title":"On the Value of Happiness: Herder contra Kant","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Destiny (ISS module); Tone (literature); Content (measure theory); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04026447914236973,"score_gpt":0.22899226336992035,"score_spread":0.1887277842275506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083102510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16698544,0.0011590213,0.00009133482,0.06749029,0.0018543692,0.00017040595,0.00008429961,0.000007519148,0.7621573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99303347,0.000007083946,0.000007806708,0.0050245714,0.0018143551,5.4347976e-7,8.28825e-7,0.00001648032,0.00009484443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890035,0.00006466031,0.00045109738,0.00008111373,0.0002516924,0.00025106032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983549,0.00044861846,0.000275365,0.0001824285,0.00038208105,0.0003565993],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001204553,0.00012466198,0.00023619081,0.00023046139,0.00026116995,0.00005433959,0.00035315775,0.00006638874,0.0011843852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000278495,0.000077331075,0.00018040425,0.0000545955,0.0007340383,0.000084580955,0.000007842632,0.0005052034,0.00002384624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036329468,0.00002350591,0.000010767472,0.000012862465,0.00006915884,0.000087462984,0.0031087499,0.000011439731,0.000036261434,0.9958651,0.0005179604,0.00022041255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002657469,0.00019164765,0.00008302457,0.0001402819,0.000023741712,0.000016625852,0.00029641003,0.000006743421,0.00010634104,0.9583352,0.040441394,0.00009282395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010678716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005273727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.826048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047183254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039359933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089954343","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2012.0006","title":"Armstrong and van Fraassen on Probabilistic Laws of Nature","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Probabilistic logic; Philosophy; Natural law; Law; Limiting; Epistemology; Problem of universals; Political science","score_opus":0.0316674003061764,"score_gpt":0.21492212499886715,"score_spread":0.18325472469269075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089954343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5114437,0.0045053666,0.0000031589425,0.006305936,0.0024508294,0.0001537895,0.00013385431,0.000008226585,0.47499517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973789,0.0000042935394,0.000041656407,0.0005128006,0.0018723072,6.413001e-7,8.9473514e-7,0.00000879368,0.00017971333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992533,0.00002724985,0.00023574872,0.00008071439,0.00017436396,0.00022862204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989732,0.000041078518,0.0002043357,0.00011101964,0.00014816904,0.0005222218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024615673,0.00010446513,0.00019147083,0.00026670934,0.00024955932,0.000042848347,0.00020182996,0.00005880789,0.0003996452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075645876,0.00008661599,0.00007227397,0.000035796875,0.0006715077,0.00042227568,0.0000066484913,0.00035500817,0.0000101762835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012711203,0.000029498913,0.0006456697,0.000033436892,0.000018614322,0.000012667187,0.007107129,0.0000061918286,0.000039678995,0.99032366,0.0014250056,0.00034573046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004807927,0.00081027526,0.003283702,0.0002942547,0.00007338974,0.00007697653,0.0006731887,0.000005764574,0.00009587691,0.5153444,0.47854087,0.0003205677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022954145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018590419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48593524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006928984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020437346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43758348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091795196","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2006.0010","title":"Theory, Observation, and the Role of Scientific Understanding in the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Epistemology; Cognitivism (psychology); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Scientific theory; Order (exchange); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Cognition","score_opus":0.015588647626654895,"score_gpt":0.1952961808118147,"score_spread":0.1797075331851598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091795196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9711528,0.0012522684,0.00006877247,0.0095137935,0.0001239933,0.00017102215,0.0000133075855,8.898735e-7,0.017703153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996663,0.0000095611485,0.000060498594,0.00019902758,0.0000466084,9.0099326e-7,0.000002060169,0.0000048006873,0.000010264114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990484,0.00017634402,0.00029197393,0.00008366317,0.00028690143,0.00011271655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940103,0.00013208743,0.000262246,0.00014209833,0.000010933126,0.000051574392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016142116,0.00006876654,0.00011706985,0.00008603588,0.00016625578,0.000027377342,0.0002855678,0.00007747694,0.000041517436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050663282,0.000042372165,0.000054887692,0.00027635123,0.0013031671,0.00016878085,0.000015490701,0.0003115505,0.0000012824368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004193644,0.000029961288,0.072636,0.000009497707,0.0000065230197,0.0000043969794,0.00283182,0.0016314115,0.0006821411,0.921577,0.000112049725,0.00043726765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003506602,0.000031784974,0.035840776,0.000033562716,0.00001550523,0.00001990488,0.0005992041,0.00007335903,0.00025842685,0.96218014,0.00055237615,0.00004431709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009182608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033627907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04060313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014012458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004570988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48015735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107553779","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2006.0011","title":"Motivating the Relevant Alternatives Approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Core (optical fiber); Philosophy; General interest; Positive economics; Contemporary philosophy; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.06275002607445239,"score_gpt":0.22920596469630186,"score_spread":0.1664559386218495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107553779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104557306,0.0025688217,0.0002945681,0.015892744,0.0021670256,0.00015691498,0.000048887447,0.000013401197,0.87430036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918875,0.000006137617,0.00024306677,0.00075407216,0.005579225,0.0000013193595,0.0000031948919,0.00001614682,0.0015093462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911535,0.00010045542,0.0003286612,0.00008771695,0.00014974394,0.00021809936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905926,0.00011762455,0.00029231035,0.00013448978,0.00025629043,0.00014000906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042095926,0.000109342625,0.00018322257,0.00013328182,0.00047382148,0.00012620976,0.0003025014,0.000036187455,0.00011195812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008115703,0.00007114364,0.00014095656,0.00003502535,0.00063630816,0.00017116156,0.0000074672776,0.0004121873,0.000013633312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002789626,0.000015150295,0.0004144072,0.000017581473,0.000044750872,0.000029547142,0.010596881,0.000066405395,0.000020222953,0.9846395,0.003806288,0.00034646367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027591523,0.00009795984,0.0006567796,0.00006886926,0.00004523523,0.000058995938,0.002198339,0.000043259846,0.000066787696,0.78811055,0.20821558,0.0001617395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061683045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011064079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8873302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050168583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027858504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9324672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113636945","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2010.10716728","title":"Incompatibilism and Prudential Obligation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Incompatibilism; Determinism; Free will; Compatibilism; Premise; Epistemology; Obligation; Philosophy; Skepticism; Moral responsibility; Libertarianism; Indeterminism; Control (management); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.020168831416003247,"score_gpt":0.22615790996121699,"score_spread":0.20598907854521373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113636945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900867,0.000047939513,0.000015025405,0.003001621,0.0012752815,0.000043317632,0.0000084543735,0.000003589995,0.005518119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985638,0.0000042788133,0.00012257342,0.00051084434,0.0007554599,3.3638472e-7,2.6233752e-7,0.0000065655827,0.0000358784],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944496,0.000025946954,0.00018065449,0.000093828436,0.00012338012,0.00013124675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927175,0.00003020744,0.00011365445,0.000090244896,0.000052228308,0.00044191824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011418442,0.00006223715,0.00008687519,0.00019381227,0.0001273845,0.000061712766,0.00017927404,0.000042690404,0.00013919758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028392297,0.00005375878,0.000037233232,0.00011940233,0.00015236686,0.00024941805,0.000007895794,0.000270081,0.000014725283],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014540828,0.000031428845,0.013479876,0.000025388665,0.0000076303895,0.00052629405,0.0011017837,0.0000113701335,0.8343373,0.13717526,0.0023109955,0.01097815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016614749,0.00047228724,0.061508976,0.00011854985,0.000044114808,0.0022400701,0.000039363324,0.00028762838,0.17028278,0.7207389,0.0420625,0.0005433477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038303703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040719556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6640545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000137399975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024236832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2272247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120880503","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0023","title":"Truth in Virtue of Meaning","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Philosophy; Quine; Empiricism","score_opus":0.039772900000427554,"score_gpt":0.2663466838857376,"score_spread":0.22657378388531008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120880503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3913494,0.00041548064,0.00006121597,0.0016299919,0.00081914134,0.00004430534,0.00001157309,0.0000025333172,0.60566634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992737,0.0000036581605,0.00010658062,0.00027604794,0.0003086032,6.539702e-7,2.9911385e-7,0.0000082034885,0.000022210093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895805,0.00009485513,0.00041446032,0.00011497952,0.000159253,0.00025841454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989495,0.00011158161,0.00018642974,0.00015869396,0.00008224283,0.00051151204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036831506,0.00008864216,0.00024056963,0.00040510914,0.00006162617,0.000004728534,0.00037919666,0.00007501449,0.00056259154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019165654,0.00007915712,0.00010006813,0.0003968897,0.00049058476,0.000113823015,0.000007677009,0.00028145046,0.00003629854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032189,0.00002718954,0.0035485218,0.0000031913241,0.000014710585,0.0008425998,0.0015238384,0.000014800514,0.00008476274,0.9935042,0.00008153673,0.00032241634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063436455,0.00027378395,0.015377008,0.00007199404,0.000008218163,0.0005320515,0.000080148755,0.000005647364,0.00021531226,0.9822237,0.00046753362,0.000110262095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009008274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004796439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60792434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000636536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034293983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61599827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135214580","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716599","title":"Contemporary Skepticism and the Cariesian God","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Genius; Psychology","score_opus":0.06418901640702497,"score_gpt":0.2300197583400521,"score_spread":0.1658307419330271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135214580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03152107,0.015182329,0.000026871017,0.18600598,0.0019327572,0.00020588048,0.0000705675,0.000010843397,0.7650437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98936456,0.000026883154,0.00005105102,0.005324376,0.0039711157,0.0000011607268,0.0000015785427,0.000012876831,0.0012464211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992384,0.00010445413,0.00030644695,0.00007469844,0.00010387627,0.00017214104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990547,0.0001281988,0.00019273694,0.0001292557,0.00018915217,0.00030597262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047991134,0.00010551479,0.00025324806,0.00011666366,0.00040278744,0.00013157247,0.0001904644,0.000049840946,0.00020589984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007285838,0.00006949085,0.00011918013,0.000020247364,0.0017037565,0.00022286273,0.0000074592544,0.00036882926,0.000018452489],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020679416,0.0000057306097,0.000108260705,0.000012119777,0.000073295356,0.00003973757,0.02914672,0.0000018130595,0.0000015564074,0.9549938,0.014731981,0.0008643057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009343434,0.000072935974,0.000081435384,0.000038577517,0.000048361482,0.00006165908,0.0014162819,0.000008405907,0.0000086628115,0.25664094,0.74058676,0.00010161715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037963665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033768356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9578435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034682445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005552183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9838629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149704867","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2007.0025","title":"Teleology Without Tears: Aristotle and the Role of Mechanistic Conceptions of Organisms","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Teleology; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Context (archaeology); Natural philosophy; Philosophy; Ancient Greek; Ancient philosophy; Field (mathematics); History","score_opus":0.014540672982007851,"score_gpt":0.20268905907084223,"score_spread":0.18814838608883439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149704867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41437626,0.006107595,0.00058801397,0.01111464,0.0016532964,0.0004527698,0.0002614519,0.000015244419,0.5654307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987387,0.000009521615,0.00009279491,0.00023128415,0.0008220547,5.145105e-7,9.758852e-7,0.000011604747,0.00009256929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999147,0.000051961586,0.00043788884,0.00007327091,0.0001249881,0.00016489314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988819,0.00018205165,0.0003377481,0.00012445544,0.0002465594,0.00022732763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000392228,0.00009557833,0.00031625136,0.00017968849,0.0001775314,0.000019069541,0.00018740125,0.000051387156,0.0005206139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012369706,0.00006478935,0.000104877065,0.000053874053,0.0016606179,0.00007567057,0.0000129631535,0.00022237915,0.0000053053423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006166373,0.00001805575,0.0002111465,0.000011428456,0.000058099165,0.000012854846,0.005754236,0.0000012076409,0.00037104104,0.99292797,0.000056913483,0.00051540555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007428702,0.00021368134,0.0001716889,0.000047547113,0.000086571934,0.000050711464,0.0013951391,0.0000075744465,0.0005801857,0.9711465,0.025483023,0.000074477924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012518344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009737885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58436245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027114997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020730124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6118616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154905584","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0063","title":"From Thick to Thin: Two Moral Reduction Plans","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05836533605621926,"score_gpt":0.2532884893290386,"score_spread":0.1949231532728193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154905584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24598697,0.0007140331,0.000046617133,0.28957903,0.0051254546,0.00020091065,0.00045706364,0.000036791305,0.4578531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814886,0.0000047495937,0.00009086268,0.006715486,0.011532844,6.241609e-7,0.000008873257,0.000015051456,0.00014293556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892926,0.00006443246,0.00036392544,0.00014578742,0.00023063667,0.0002659707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985159,0.000039533516,0.00015065195,0.00018650509,0.0002562171,0.0008512048],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000306262,0.00015065397,0.00024408843,0.00031483604,0.00031922112,0.00018826415,0.00034094782,0.00007390408,0.0010778068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007675174,0.00013115801,0.00014630888,0.00005877556,0.00019392799,0.0002746806,0.0000070486985,0.0006050858,0.00012426959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003956847,0.000018481222,0.000008413176,0.000002441492,0.00003312533,0.00011360714,0.013168183,0.000068104186,0.000090382215,0.9830424,0.0025207757,0.0008944876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029535027,0.0002937675,0.000075691554,0.00009519466,0.00002707587,0.00003375882,0.00031911797,0.000009084529,0.000057881414,0.9547541,0.043880876,0.00015810938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047239168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008407574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7355016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009523037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040542558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160608726","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0045","title":"Augustine on Testimony","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Augustinian Studies and Theology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Aside; Epistemology; Section (typography); Doxastic logic","score_opus":0.03572342930087379,"score_gpt":0.21729913813655094,"score_spread":0.18157570883567714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160608726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07766324,0.0008355069,0.00001177448,0.02444215,0.0017905929,0.000072069466,0.000035011017,0.000015603771,0.89513403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917168,0.000004791585,0.00004844642,0.0039543025,0.0027420176,2.8469609e-7,0.000001067512,0.000009155859,0.0015231103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934536,0.00001892978,0.00024134234,0.000076295866,0.000086122745,0.0002319489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921423,0.000043357253,0.00014974564,0.00010121436,0.00015699155,0.00033443453],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009731942,0.00010906182,0.0002005388,0.00022175432,0.00026251568,0.00004573934,0.0001770692,0.000029606845,0.0018284876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092276205,0.00008613387,0.0000934602,0.000033004966,0.0002068516,0.000080536964,0.0000034123714,0.00020421155,0.00010998672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015573829,0.000017348992,0.00013406783,0.0000027242643,0.000025992422,0.00029556587,0.0021137425,0.000013273541,0.0000019782335,0.95782804,0.036036868,0.003514806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004683391,0.0012623152,0.0013874044,0.0000824321,0.00003656431,0.00007842496,0.00031305416,0.0000054701677,0.000007897323,0.29771656,0.6984673,0.00017423708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003397413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021118831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91405356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046145793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018258244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161800791","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0056","title":"Propositions and Propositional Acts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Philosophy; Speech act; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029001187213141138,"score_gpt":0.28673428841779175,"score_spread":0.2577331012046506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161800791","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3354105,0.0038043214,0.00003927319,0.44655252,0.0007267839,0.0004888606,0.00004138651,0.000026776204,0.2129096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974942,0.00004530902,0.00059689645,0.00083745044,0.0008865618,7.6547934e-7,0.0000010177454,0.0000028866318,0.00013488992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992897,0.00006370236,0.0001556544,0.00006867351,0.0002078489,0.00021442244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989758,0.000025391222,0.000096102354,0.00003449947,0.00027512165,0.0005930671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001935264,0.000068277564,0.00011662815,0.000087757086,0.00095702225,0.000088365305,0.000119217344,0.000052817246,0.000092078655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015310099,0.00005584406,0.000056059438,0.00013073612,0.00034152786,0.00029638052,0.000003392523,0.00015208266,0.000008949587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017367176,0.00005010177,0.00345616,0.000011132126,0.00008379546,0.00022547899,0.027523695,0.000009598829,0.00040989983,0.9536521,0.009620697,0.0049399873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011938214,0.00089628174,0.15870206,0.00036016284,0.00014828454,0.00020649597,0.0047443416,0.000005470201,0.00019970105,0.5738738,0.25901505,0.00065451284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028592711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0097245015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6620837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022467393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006122666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7360738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169179198","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0046","title":"The Scrambler: An Argument Against Representationalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Direct and indirect realism; Intentionality; Philosophy; Consciousness; Epistemology; Perception; Argument (complex analysis); Content (measure theory); Philosophy of mind; Analytic philosophy; Psychology; Contemporary philosophy; Metaphysics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03292292217657917,"score_gpt":0.31274860432371276,"score_spread":0.2798256821471336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169179198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11075804,0.001326413,0.00012416519,0.08799605,0.0020519118,0.00015133683,0.000019259202,0.00001191923,0.79756093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993658,0.0000106673315,0.00008778569,0.0049646045,0.0011462854,0.0000014495516,0.0000020370069,0.0000064052965,0.00012277404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871397,0.00015768492,0.00034964838,0.00015774563,0.00025902517,0.00036191157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830097,0.00009803108,0.00017795489,0.00032818675,0.00015513654,0.000939723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006770759,0.00010529115,0.00012947083,0.00012701201,0.000415721,0.00010276265,0.0006601659,0.00006128614,0.00031999842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011479919,0.000072121446,0.00010755621,0.00023122854,0.00036362655,0.00020475156,0.0000056100284,0.00027547943,0.00008219989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028719925,0.000029909497,0.00012299864,4.0750817e-7,0.000020480831,0.00020556679,0.00051279506,0.00001995366,0.000068277535,0.98567563,0.0018310472,0.0114841815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002915986,0.0003020083,0.008584186,0.000015488586,0.000010583255,0.0001018954,0.00009171318,0.000010277545,0.00004109872,0.975424,0.0150293205,0.00009781413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017893646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025876853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88289994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079046185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027896243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35037583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268281984","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2000.10717529","title":"J.P. Burgess and G. Rosen A Subject with no Object. Oxford: Clarendon1997. Pp. x + 259.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"History and Theory of Mathematics","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Object (grammar); Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; General interest; Epistemology; Linguistics; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.022807359142566968,"score_gpt":0.23085168949700494,"score_spread":0.20804433035443798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268281984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81982726,0.0018572307,0.00015868423,0.0012663236,0.0003627368,0.0003014591,0.000060299328,0.000036374226,0.17612962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99203706,0.00013421242,0.0045156586,0.00033997747,0.00066101627,0.00000377323,0.0000020491248,0.0000706285,0.0022356017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861103,0.00012649028,0.0004592271,0.00015802917,0.00024470655,0.00040053387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823487,0.00029581538,0.00026345375,0.00028780897,0.00017408024,0.0007439626],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007126079,0.00023889837,0.00046668056,0.0002119458,0.00024995915,0.000055080603,0.00028534775,0.000112404705,0.0012274897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023490649,0.00019368976,0.00011942525,0.0001651954,0.00026510115,0.00022995217,0.000006848512,0.00041209042,0.000047324083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022119887,0.0006631526,0.004436102,0.0022633784,0.0015760186,0.007972458,0.029746689,0.000070570095,0.00040094502,0.8527598,0.06892635,0.02897258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015389274,0.0007128086,0.00014614906,0.0005872636,0.00019892177,0.0027625153,0.00021859504,0.000019825004,0.00008254843,0.8396762,0.15356791,0.0004883696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015881904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016014165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17389402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013052922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006265416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276512997","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2011.0004","title":"Elliott Sober, Evidence and Evolution: The Logic Behind the Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2008. Pp. xx + 392.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08880432681029264,"score_gpt":0.20606379134197442,"score_spread":0.11725946453168178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276512997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26295105,0.038710926,0.000051154646,0.037846725,0.004806128,0.00056450715,0.00014494424,0.00003260014,0.65489197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963193,0.00015305956,0.000028994567,0.0006821456,0.0010436707,5.551151e-7,2.1372307e-7,0.0000072529583,0.0017648139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867886,0.00009488541,0.0002426949,0.00022305704,0.00038182587,0.00037869663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837446,0.000089206194,0.0002743345,0.00031509172,0.0004303267,0.00051657076],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009941107,0.00015678159,0.00017103917,0.0002643539,0.0033094895,0.00021440523,0.0013207088,0.000038234964,0.00021478444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001187544,0.00009904059,0.00010390319,0.00017215055,0.0071861185,0.0013417157,0.000055039134,0.00040342784,0.00003181214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023749675,0.000016192951,0.00035390473,0.0000101468095,0.00001787786,0.00011003693,0.01006252,0.0000042278175,0.000034797147,0.97526956,0.013928815,0.00016817663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010873908,0.001667454,0.052521847,0.00071306736,0.00044594522,0.0012117348,0.009719212,0.00016767714,0.00016685291,0.19769216,0.7333971,0.0012095579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008652255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067958455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7775774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026787922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015913995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99798805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283049953","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2000.10717524","title":"Making Do: Troubling Stoic Tendencies in an Otherwise Compelling Theory of Autonomy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Argument (complex analysis); Autonomy; Nothing; Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Worry; Moral responsibility; Free will; Philosophy; Moral agency; Law and economics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.10142586991914194,"score_gpt":0.27668237153852937,"score_spread":0.17525650161938744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283049953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98186857,0.00072308007,0.00008538038,0.00058161886,0.00022153936,0.000074308955,0.000014770701,0.0000064766555,0.01642427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988323,0.000016398002,0.00025195393,0.0005272649,0.0002640844,6.4985755e-7,2.0785421e-7,0.000017672226,0.00008948381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987223,0.0001690223,0.00047429444,0.00016077085,0.00017793757,0.00029564783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991836,0.000096052245,0.000209548,0.00017240102,0.00004926476,0.00028913497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004026312,0.00012460575,0.00024627472,0.0004990437,0.0001134816,0.000055474993,0.00047603704,0.000051904106,0.00083402684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000087888424,0.000112295544,0.00009877599,0.00033693083,0.00020099386,0.0004274435,0.00000561794,0.00029418414,0.000012522799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056481594,0.00065226277,0.054749157,0.00030173126,0.000074981224,0.005440726,0.047597904,0.04009654,0.12624733,0.4942696,0.00019004666,0.22981489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002917078,0.0010142807,0.010205668,0.0018366623,0.00006100327,0.00051584514,0.0010956951,0.0027265607,0.017417679,0.95120895,0.010010035,0.0009905437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002197259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081211096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45693934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012147687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006603411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91320086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289845231","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2004.10716578","title":"Spinoza and the<i>a priori</i>","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"A priori and a posteriori; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027844585641954116,"score_gpt":0.20407082467760784,"score_spread":0.17622623903565374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289845231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1397138,0.01166675,0.00003323255,0.35209325,0.004732,0.00042033495,0.00013517933,0.000025506932,0.49117994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903326,0.000044272718,0.000034140307,0.005443481,0.0039339373,0.0000012247194,0.0000010644543,0.000012511284,0.00019679475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991232,0.000044649503,0.0003183398,0.000089331785,0.00015988253,0.00026458173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896955,0.00006478173,0.00011368715,0.00011938236,0.00012799106,0.0006046177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021382608,0.00012341634,0.00022948608,0.00011118634,0.000332786,0.00014190962,0.00022326024,0.000037220794,0.00040897075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081914426,0.000074933625,0.00015026561,0.000037773596,0.001120706,0.0001632864,0.000012145812,0.000294763,0.00004291266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029797555,0.000011183465,0.00002938086,0.000010527856,0.000036147143,0.0000645757,0.0024428137,0.0000028398927,0.0000011717124,0.99671435,0.00038945637,0.00026774185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012412048,0.00007998818,0.0000601997,0.000054927597,0.000032402495,0.00007964828,0.00008323669,5.677708e-7,0.000010277859,0.71265775,0.2856203,0.00007950009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017271525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021764843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8506188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056153865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027351122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4477943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290752124","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2004.10716575","title":"Can't We All Just Respect One Another a Little Less?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Morality; Objectivity (philosophy); Philosophy; Centrality; Relation (database); Contemporary philosophy; Foundation (evidence); Analytic philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.15183231025111418,"score_gpt":0.32816319110817116,"score_spread":0.17633088085705698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290752124","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020839673,0.0016001983,0.000056742465,0.64361924,0.00094584405,0.0001397032,0.00007171772,0.000020899728,0.33270597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98818755,0.00011909511,0.00026068723,0.0076174554,0.0034876033,0.0000012014683,0.0000010921052,0.000022830014,0.0003024819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982153,0.0001617416,0.00036327998,0.00015143289,0.00046198748,0.00064622384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978217,0.000112152644,0.00016296437,0.00018706167,0.00026007323,0.0014560439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074551016,0.00014015846,0.00026501514,0.0002990453,0.00046987488,0.000108589265,0.0005176084,0.00022268454,0.00030899514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005722127,0.00014106125,0.00018148734,0.00031544906,0.0008121995,0.00024491135,0.000011079616,0.00064150797,0.000079344085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013665841,0.00003424129,0.00010162805,0.000014319151,0.000052462245,0.00024883426,0.010546933,0.000028356078,0.000031399366,0.9876433,0.00099669,0.00028818293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042366938,0.00011091509,0.0001641629,0.00016076429,0.00003801584,0.000018231895,0.00061779155,1.9849087e-7,0.000076619894,0.9031513,0.095073655,0.00016469017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051050425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16743125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96734786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075637107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048151873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9552687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295037080","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2001.10717561","title":"Matter and Aristotle's Material Cause","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Philosophy; Epistemology; Virtue; The Thing; Aesthetics; Living matter; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.03581503502933266,"score_gpt":0.20819654376927524,"score_spread":0.17238150873994257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295037080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4713521,0.0006017576,0.000005732959,0.03390243,0.0030054054,0.00009442434,0.00012809249,0.000011900249,0.49089816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919701,0.000012862355,0.000018238848,0.0018750635,0.0051805656,7.5956706e-7,0.0000030204606,0.000018257831,0.00092111237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928564,0.000028626964,0.00027182957,0.000096226104,0.000103433355,0.00021426033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991429,0.000022682014,0.000120180295,0.000107599626,0.00010037003,0.0005062797],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008845015,0.000120968456,0.00019551784,0.00020638721,0.00024396948,0.00019793885,0.00013878591,0.000044814835,0.005792684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001571914,0.00010030872,0.000077925484,0.000030082027,0.00033942825,0.0002516781,0.000009994743,0.00018254119,0.00014464765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008410584,0.000034263856,0.0029129006,0.000029232102,0.00011134521,0.0013291148,0.0043592784,0.0000013580185,0.000052406143,0.96110564,0.029105015,0.0008753502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029244754,0.000106541615,0.0007401415,0.000045794684,0.000041371575,0.00029613555,0.00007846309,0.0000011760324,0.000018194634,0.41832632,0.5799104,0.00014304015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001020863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070233587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5508054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004473755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011671859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2311295274","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2000.10717534","title":"Statistical Method and the Peircean Account of Truth","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Epistemology; Ascription; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Commit; Pragmatic theory of truth; Coherence theory of truth; Alethiology; Truth condition; Computer science","score_opus":0.0249108205537783,"score_gpt":0.24255717964465728,"score_spread":0.21764635909087898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2311295274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14853945,0.0040311185,0.0006798046,0.04290524,0.002624963,0.00033910043,0.00046257192,0.000011318262,0.8004064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974863,0.00003531648,0.0004105151,0.00058572466,0.0012906874,0.0000012755112,0.0000029656214,0.000009220185,0.00017800904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919266,0.00012468522,0.0003457885,0.00006872493,0.000129031,0.00013914487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908805,0.00029983112,0.00015831894,0.000114427574,0.00011976594,0.0002195796],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005146446,0.000087010805,0.00021504832,0.00012489177,0.00022568088,0.0000836163,0.00017610153,0.000027469276,0.004257522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000983153,0.00005738465,0.000064176915,0.000031937314,0.00064358365,0.0001895696,0.000003612668,0.0001798273,0.000013891208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048592417,0.0000096516005,0.00002779442,0.0000174244,0.000040893206,0.00000778797,0.013602206,0.000007928826,8.081846e-7,0.9748469,0.001539905,0.00985013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060894125,0.000086944114,0.00043984465,0.00004776595,0.0000719729,0.00006819499,0.00048678566,0.000035574823,0.000007990018,0.9408749,0.057192422,0.000078696095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019284039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010374172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8489468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027138927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002910931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318527100","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1162349","title":"Human rights and the rights of states: a relational account","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sovereignty; Human rights; Statism; Morality; Political science; Norm (philosophy); Law; Fundamental rights; State (computer science); Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.04495130499461853,"score_gpt":0.29355386286122864,"score_spread":0.24860255786661012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318527100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34846818,0.0009510082,0.00015720201,0.25555035,0.0009702769,0.00032153312,0.00020403719,0.000011622855,0.39336577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99831146,0.0000060376346,0.000040496983,0.00044357142,0.0009419993,7.5663206e-7,4.3630152e-7,0.000004096393,0.00025115666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878746,0.00022359373,0.0003372304,0.0000777589,0.00033080796,0.00024312994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983874,0.000451616,0.00020780995,0.00010162994,0.000307862,0.00054369075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010832755,0.000076678145,0.0001839535,0.00014005201,0.00083756854,0.000025817215,0.0002547815,0.00010114511,0.00020413497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002155903,0.000039245766,0.000095295705,0.00010775416,0.002534313,0.00027163592,0.000008218195,0.00020997718,0.000009096848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014052973,0.0000055658097,0.00017634375,0.000003446098,0.000027927406,0.000013643186,0.0026967165,9.1367264e-7,0.0000058051955,0.99633604,0.0006883776,0.000031175303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066114386,0.000041038307,0.0006788578,0.00009091409,0.000022552067,0.000006812393,0.000039730556,6.612167e-7,0.000015743104,0.9475476,0.050834477,0.00006047775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029009353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054546475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6498433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119278484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059632654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97745657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318606975","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1165571","title":"Psychopathy and internalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Externalism; Psychology; Counterexample; Moral disengagement; Moral psychology; Epistemology; Moral reasoning; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09279190722121253,"score_gpt":0.2581394660802139,"score_spread":0.16534755885900135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318606975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9144842,0.00026449852,0.00013948385,0.07100114,0.0014488363,0.00003470109,0.000020468871,0.0000042220136,0.01260245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950107,0.000051595478,0.000060387458,0.0042269966,0.00043083084,3.8026485e-7,4.3083674e-8,0.0000058736764,0.0002131939],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994166,0.00003812559,0.00017262348,0.00011209741,0.00010361133,0.00015695742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992604,0.00004485615,0.00009695738,0.000075639815,0.00003450082,0.00048759964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000110787056,0.00006802147,0.00009798534,0.00018003827,0.00006414135,0.000016596945,0.00019404972,0.00003313603,0.00018971023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011594975,0.000042381387,0.000049328926,0.000054532476,0.0002069394,0.0001516699,0.000007052959,0.00008953145,0.00005928106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030009722,0.0001277807,0.027381873,0.000029918498,0.00006392989,0.003856723,0.0010222864,0.0000024182682,0.410951,0.3616649,0.06440986,0.13018924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002356887,0.0007182831,0.027796902,0.00043417962,0.00001917231,0.004502743,0.000015601323,0.0000019594704,0.016582634,0.82409114,0.12316585,0.00031463496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005718541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011023767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46242628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003690652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008366236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2077194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321929654","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1152535","title":"Non-mereological pluralistic supersubstantivalism: an alternative perspective on the matter/spacetime relationship","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Spacetime; Spacetime topology; Mereology; Causal sets; Spherically symmetric spacetime; Stationary spacetime; Quantum field theory in curved spacetime; Spacetime symmetries; Theoretical physics; Epistemology; Physics; Philosophy; Quantum mechanics; Quantum gravity; Quantum","score_opus":0.06276529155814807,"score_gpt":0.31191783974272475,"score_spread":0.24915254818457666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321929654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4357515,0.00009188172,0.0003185278,0.13397084,0.00094734156,0.00017140861,0.00007513503,0.000008455203,0.42866492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99620736,0.0000016015791,0.00003128365,0.0026251553,0.00086370244,0.0000052139935,6.113153e-7,0.00001628403,0.0002487618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983569,0.00037673826,0.00030191685,0.00027708057,0.00026144067,0.00042592338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976325,0.0007904063,0.00019342566,0.00035984212,0.00025126283,0.0007725575],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000602146,0.00018449801,0.00022352595,0.00023158919,0.00029612894,0.00004774404,0.0007658679,0.00011136911,0.0057564513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051882555,0.00009274926,0.00014643758,0.00027688214,0.0012428181,0.0002263458,0.000014053227,0.00042530822,0.0010692008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095220006,0.00003737751,0.004858614,6.921995e-7,0.000045287732,0.00025207482,0.002637863,0.0000027280778,0.00008025968,0.99083155,0.0011035051,0.000054807046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047045483,0.000526009,0.04107549,0.00007648009,0.000025784462,0.00014931752,0.00062145543,0.0000037589552,0.0000675213,0.95651066,0.0003091032,0.00016399025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087827625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031084986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56045586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003083279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020634843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2420378534","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1193406","title":"The logical form of negative action sentences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Action (physics); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Agency (philosophy); Event (particle physics); Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Logical analysis; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08662138808633635,"score_gpt":0.2651004181185032,"score_spread":0.17847903003216686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2420378534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94314444,0.00021422254,0.0001715526,0.038898125,0.0014952853,0.00010073353,0.000033562337,0.000004887999,0.015937196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991857,0.00007942231,0.000017331642,0.00025217907,0.0003096798,5.339522e-7,2.3039707e-8,0.0000034830243,0.00015164961],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934804,0.000053517535,0.00021291112,0.00007031814,0.00015450116,0.00016073411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914074,0.00024407421,0.00021346242,0.0000832164,0.00008548538,0.00023302033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013257873,0.00005766688,0.000091102505,0.00007772282,0.00017284922,0.000017171102,0.0002764276,0.000027400185,0.00008554183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007018243,0.00002544119,0.00008257438,0.00012512154,0.0003481433,0.00020983745,0.0000066683206,0.00009038651,0.000013998347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025172558,0.00008044224,0.011077101,0.000034234286,0.00005959327,0.0006494899,0.0019600894,0.0000114653,0.42755252,0.3826327,0.009667937,0.16602269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005281762,0.00053455424,0.00654045,0.00014761316,0.000013586945,0.0002530588,0.00014854483,0.000010123357,0.14711764,0.82913107,0.015445506,0.00012967404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019398452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017643758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44649836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047670645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002382481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13294339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463359842","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2002.10716516","title":"Origins Are Not Essences in Evolutionary Systematics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Natural selection; Selection (genetic algorithm); Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Inference; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Psychology; History; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Archaeology","score_opus":0.08524593220961214,"score_gpt":0.20774232345750748,"score_spread":0.12249639124789534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2463359842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27554247,0.0117572,0.000012881006,0.044543713,0.008254295,0.00034847038,0.0002303077,0.000031904605,0.65927875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974184,0.000016924347,0.00005480253,0.00062259124,0.0014533831,0.0000014696084,4.291789e-7,0.000007717157,0.0004242589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989465,0.000042699314,0.0004201497,0.000106130785,0.00025171586,0.00023279118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990045,0.00004084616,0.00029906293,0.00012259692,0.00017689979,0.0003560875],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020973032,0.000111241665,0.0002430356,0.00056639884,0.00036297122,0.00008610661,0.00038001244,0.000037000875,0.0014528282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006354156,0.00009850751,0.00009361497,0.0000949199,0.0005430602,0.00053074193,0.000005399598,0.00022667549,0.00013404211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038197477,0.000037310594,0.0007693273,0.00008993684,0.00001362289,0.00037928607,0.011740969,0.00005365896,0.0000072786543,0.979688,0.007142065,0.00007470654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007692295,0.0004174961,0.0017368345,0.001790013,0.000050130628,0.00032662883,0.004000688,0.0005936068,0.000012147278,0.28798863,0.701696,0.00061861175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016276437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022879573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72187597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004457895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021284436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467609113","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2001.10717572","title":"Rational Choice with Deontic Constraints","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Point (geometry); Advertising; Law and economics; Free riding; Free rider problem; Marketing; Internet privacy; Economics; Microeconomics; Public good; Computer science","score_opus":0.04614076893581058,"score_gpt":0.2989282900366215,"score_spread":0.25278752110081093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467609113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7569652,0.0005940007,0.000032517597,0.012956328,0.000491099,0.000116957104,0.000011449428,0.0000063561256,0.22882605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984755,0.000020235526,0.00033439018,0.00042337822,0.0005756136,0.0000014528138,7.57132e-7,0.0000066446205,0.00016205439],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936277,0.00003662817,0.00017937187,0.000071404924,0.0001332378,0.00021658604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913156,0.00003974948,0.00012844913,0.000051713505,0.0001611733,0.0004873793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017873074,0.00006875483,0.00012685059,0.00012913473,0.0003923695,0.000059136448,0.00017298473,0.000034977416,0.0005610319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066529916,0.00006414215,0.000046913854,0.00011935289,0.00070483173,0.0002588767,0.0000037724649,0.00011104501,0.000026343969],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033755066,0.000050989813,0.73232216,0.0000040569066,0.00012443468,0.00065167644,0.010748378,0.000040656152,0.00017768865,0.24963322,0.0031567065,0.0030563048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007021502,0.0018998034,0.20886514,0.0005981426,0.00033182066,0.0013155905,0.026302345,0.0000136278495,0.0006042357,0.16379274,0.587149,0.0021060037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010669544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18299054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58399236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003256673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014059391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474551991","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.812371","title":"Spinoza on essence and ideal individuation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Individuation; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Relation (database); Simple (philosophy); Object (grammar); Ideal (ethics); Property (philosophy); Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.04373868343928102,"score_gpt":0.21872080797610954,"score_spread":0.17498212453682851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474551991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61400133,0.0010336086,0.000025763553,0.09938523,0.0024694095,0.00034606282,0.000113552254,0.000020210455,0.2826048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99382234,0.000009785661,0.000026040758,0.0033326626,0.0025995148,0.0000024112605,0.0000034312552,0.0000111532945,0.00019265112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991455,0.000041936128,0.00028376226,0.000102604405,0.00018041651,0.0002457889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988563,0.000068114874,0.00011463482,0.000091336035,0.00016766314,0.0007019245],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000106580206,0.00011852975,0.0001668555,0.00020498286,0.00024055441,0.0001823835,0.00015247174,0.000044261204,0.0023130046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007916489,0.00009232555,0.00007289265,0.00003456906,0.00029165173,0.00028861954,0.000008234316,0.0002476693,0.00020201606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044624253,0.000015558051,0.00035803136,0.000012030376,0.000021048281,0.000021300748,0.00088639423,0.0000015463858,0.000008054688,0.99462026,0.002810751,0.00124057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002588148,0.00027743948,0.0028917536,0.000098735836,0.000018370072,0.000026321339,0.000103147075,0.000011419495,0.000021452903,0.91492355,0.08123899,0.00013002715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015848221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005330431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.379821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042551426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011502399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475106116","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2003.10716551","title":"Kant on Sensibility and the Understanding in the 1770s","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Nothing; Metaphysics; Sensibility; Critical philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.11597161719384437,"score_gpt":0.23575180517224362,"score_spread":0.11978018797839925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475106116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11145208,0.0011683073,0.00002118701,0.1377058,0.000866104,0.00023392668,0.000021829466,0.000003553346,0.7485272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993886,0.000017872064,0.0000029013668,0.005614624,0.0004538927,7.897074e-7,2.277189e-7,0.0000068635295,0.000016812428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989541,0.00038623333,0.00024456662,0.00008182076,0.00016268344,0.00017056898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989702,0.00056466204,0.000100954625,0.0001536077,0.000058641985,0.00015192032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022142585,0.00009145075,0.00016133975,0.00012887537,0.00040561173,0.00014635203,0.00017074394,0.000038104383,0.00012655923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036258076,0.0000453341,0.000082259634,0.000046300727,0.0010692079,0.000073926654,0.0000039636047,0.000583786,0.000004519662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028198341,0.000008594509,0.000030595947,0.00000566906,0.000014202053,0.00006429302,0.012229315,0.0000054979155,4.609841e-7,0.9875023,0.00008186326,0.000029054381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061183324,0.00007205255,0.000052057992,0.000048548547,0.000013145577,0.000044075554,0.0024689594,0.0000073216142,0.0000016851728,0.9847788,0.011841275,0.000060234743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006962793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014110328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88243395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008645178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023280756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7873894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489572628","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2000.10717547","title":"From Communitarianism to Republicanism: On Sandel and His Critics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Communitarianism; Content (measure theory); Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Liberalism; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03322508919717452,"score_gpt":0.27647319577936935,"score_spread":0.24324810658219484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489572628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20035572,0.00016938742,0.000021624277,0.13485664,0.0003639477,0.000079491765,0.00008073294,0.000007881498,0.6640646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835538,0.00002697164,0.00031637674,0.01452157,0.00111026,8.0899787e-7,0.0000014281845,0.0000073831648,0.00046139976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991656,0.00011330838,0.00021439714,0.000089265806,0.00011558654,0.00030183617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788266,0.00016877115,0.00003911554,0.00014425087,0.00008340364,0.0016818172],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003354302,0.00007514549,0.00016119685,0.00014232728,0.0004189705,0.000115832816,0.00028352768,0.00008186002,0.0024804971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028889038,0.00007805064,0.00005000206,0.0000892952,0.00025020423,0.00018523038,0.0000068343543,0.00024119858,0.000063824446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000143744965,0.000021041576,0.00023509235,0.0000020404498,0.000029932004,0.00011499714,0.008593941,0.000006390882,0.0000042812435,0.9580532,0.013366398,0.019558357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016801362,0.0001153513,0.00081451726,0.000034463636,0.000011577246,0.0000066527905,0.0004713387,0.0000014790329,0.0000065705435,0.44418362,0.55409503,0.00009140983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07715953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78319806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017118226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008057386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508304136","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2008.0002","title":"Elisabeth A. Lloyd The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: Harvard University Press2005.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Orgasm; Sociology; Economic history; History; Gender studies; Human sexuality","score_opus":0.04919226334920433,"score_gpt":0.20475750140353596,"score_spread":0.15556523805433164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508304136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99479276,0.0005546492,4.9874524e-7,0.0026854526,0.000048683556,0.00007482701,0.00007669257,6.5350514e-7,0.0017658098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99969846,0.000037179983,0.000006659783,0.00011419255,0.0001066881,6.779809e-8,2.3060302e-7,3.202199e-7,0.000036228954],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993483,0.00006691435,0.00017155525,0.000077397824,0.00014948349,0.00018634675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933195,0.0001963884,0.00018075413,0.000035148296,0.00014784337,0.00010789517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097123475,0.00006447809,0.00011789192,0.00003792935,0.00043702772,0.000019585235,0.0004648969,0.00002731122,0.000012652132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001234358,0.00001856953,0.000057055735,0.0005804101,0.00077310245,0.00009300046,0.000038220423,0.0001439344,5.798886e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021937465,0.00012884509,0.84535515,0.00004387311,0.00009386552,0.002291209,0.0032817514,0.000046964364,0.07312292,0.062317647,0.008012724,0.0050856913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001397318,0.00014091896,0.99115884,0.00005630261,0.000022192775,0.00055294036,0.0023059214,0.0000050952667,0.0009518633,0.0011183037,0.0034826568,0.00006520499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010501272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11729683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14580373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046747824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010774194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515709034","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1218254","title":"Mental causation, compatibilism and counterfactuals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibilism; Causation; Counterfactual conditional; Free will; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Counterfactual thinking","score_opus":0.04129434277311143,"score_gpt":0.2357986121983564,"score_spread":0.19450426942524499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515709034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831345,0.00022774083,0.00004212854,0.012093039,0.000611021,0.00005952215,0.00007530949,0.000004051447,0.0037526675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985917,0.000035938163,0.000020696245,0.0009689933,0.00024215621,3.3454776e-7,1.6996101e-7,0.0000070496976,0.00013291671],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993724,0.000039842926,0.00020606424,0.000102193495,0.00012686326,0.00015261275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992717,0.00006668973,0.00011658049,0.00008319736,0.00004942599,0.00041244493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000979959,0.00007336571,0.000107651555,0.0001387016,0.00011568328,0.000030283196,0.00014389952,0.000025543633,0.00030640734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018956579,0.000046750316,0.00003219078,0.00006527642,0.00018210529,0.00026349226,0.000006886812,0.000061389306,0.00003146434],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005970369,0.00006443764,0.03792064,0.000040724386,0.000039362203,0.00083080627,0.004822602,0.0000061510304,0.80508566,0.08673306,0.036280267,0.028116565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054885903,0.0014391866,0.051750045,0.0009298248,0.000065993125,0.0032654183,0.00016988213,0.00005696222,0.2985695,0.4182332,0.21890827,0.0011231308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022034814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081415713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50651616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006717437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019475022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33549455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519232365","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716600","title":"The Ethical Significance of National Settlement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Human settlement; Doctrine; Quarter (Canadian coin); Obstacle; History; Middle East; Political science; Law; Ethnology; Archaeology; Economics","score_opus":0.06745263494160067,"score_gpt":0.33944931321179916,"score_spread":0.27199667827019847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519232365","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039109737,0.00063078414,0.000054486638,0.6792612,0.0005760023,0.00010353772,0.000080529804,0.0000042393385,0.31537825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925127,0.000035620127,0.00016473907,0.0045719245,0.0026027814,0.0000011749052,6.247914e-7,0.0000049986297,0.00010546179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837095,0.00022487085,0.0003716692,0.000065113905,0.00066632935,0.00030109377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997878,0.00058788084,0.00018049995,0.00007950502,0.00064317073,0.00063092104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002310034,0.00006324299,0.00012017226,0.00009225063,0.0006122373,0.000040531406,0.00042670834,0.00016214019,0.00013940093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015549727,0.000048784266,0.000112445676,0.00016617418,0.0011804736,0.000113081274,0.000006936207,0.0006856443,0.000019900684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006745822,0.000008120937,0.00011824531,0.0000036491842,0.000018829145,0.000004703621,0.0018737845,0.000042525742,0.000012097938,0.99238276,0.004882166,0.00064634724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009958918,0.000035546316,0.0002370921,0.000020918536,0.0000060230755,0.0000026253451,0.000170167,0.000004611913,0.00006724079,0.661239,0.33806866,0.000048471353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014887918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018247772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9886017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030837327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042689326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531119672","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1235856","title":"Kant’s deductions of morality and freedom","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main; Simon Fraser University; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Morality; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05596386193333154,"score_gpt":0.2243051721624456,"score_spread":0.16834131022911408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531119672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5555741,0.002625168,0.000086187305,0.19696777,0.0032409148,0.00015652132,0.0006254409,0.000014594493,0.24070928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980612,0.000032318425,0.00003487435,0.00028222683,0.001463592,4.936695e-7,4.1206334e-7,0.0000093737135,0.0001155043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931943,0.000046965262,0.00030134022,0.00007586246,0.000113247996,0.00014317337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989052,0.00009153968,0.00018165213,0.00012046578,0.00029603302,0.0004051278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029395137,0.00008227784,0.00019113968,0.00020315737,0.00016105863,0.000031127984,0.00014748325,0.000046927675,0.00079376885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014250795,0.000053442356,0.00009203201,0.000027152828,0.0011289959,0.00019508328,0.000009679838,0.00015937391,0.00000812646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000091709235,0.000011281252,0.00015643603,0.000013686022,0.000039355855,0.000015794276,0.0012507868,5.0079393e-7,0.00013273476,0.9974234,0.00031062137,0.00063624483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002690101,0.00011096773,0.00024109,0.000111591966,0.000025545485,0.000030328334,0.00009090867,6.9524873e-7,0.00006448468,0.9640465,0.034932513,0.0000763939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016096008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072559975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4424871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031579748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033057889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86912125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2541780161","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1250201","title":"John Locke, ‘Hobbist’: of sleeping souls and thinking matter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Medieval and Classical Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Soul; Metaphysics; Materialism; Epistemology; Suspect; Relation (database); False accusation; Law","score_opus":0.028449510434281306,"score_gpt":0.20241392596738636,"score_spread":0.17396441553310504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2541780161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4248246,0.0033308386,0.00016587839,0.12200024,0.0029451177,0.00023538126,0.00018542534,0.000018775005,0.44629374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951767,0.00001548659,0.00004671748,0.001943585,0.002315605,7.51183e-7,5.678623e-7,0.000018622695,0.00048200367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989259,0.000042904405,0.00044570246,0.000118184624,0.00021878288,0.00024852902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987657,0.00009427691,0.000286444,0.00013209438,0.0002177945,0.00050366926],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022839251,0.0001385023,0.00030123282,0.0002644526,0.0001996049,0.0000587387,0.00023619419,0.00006830403,0.0023116767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006479773,0.00008731121,0.00012894417,0.000033045882,0.00054491975,0.00027556944,0.000018428249,0.00022132455,0.000066318964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004507763,0.000028384085,0.0053584184,0.00013102614,0.00016717354,0.00013425839,0.008610548,5.9769684e-7,0.0006940261,0.9672786,0.011872405,0.0056794574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071575947,0.00025403008,0.0011576171,0.0007578636,0.000071490766,0.000058848647,0.00018371316,0.0000016855903,0.0003555696,0.83824784,0.1579571,0.00023848496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000394424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012346116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5703521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004753685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001641068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561537140","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2007.0013","title":"Brute Requirements - Gert Joshua, Brute Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press2004.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Evolving Legal Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Computer science; Content (measure theory); Operations research; Library science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.053848892955886796,"score_gpt":0.2720914852537166,"score_spread":0.21824259229782983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561537140","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2789866,0.00574076,0.0034331183,0.048145197,0.006693031,0.00063974236,0.00018861284,0.000050746963,0.65612215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756333,0.000020894768,0.0003377271,0.0005346763,0.0026502952,7.443952e-8,0.0000021185049,0.000011070547,0.020809794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839056,0.00011262881,0.00035978435,0.00015036651,0.0005346406,0.00045200484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977802,0.00006668109,0.00044144932,0.00015195188,0.00028672747,0.0012729686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012741373,0.00011487569,0.00020346779,0.00018577509,0.00060383504,0.00009620498,0.0004990999,0.00011245847,0.00014411261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021517905,0.00012599897,0.0001403028,0.000349083,0.00018607278,0.0005919812,0.000011485765,0.0002321807,0.00003171494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006285592,0.000030352427,0.04233196,0.000021373111,0.00012934004,0.0006646889,0.004332222,0.000034616412,0.00014777808,0.50677276,0.4444347,0.0010373916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049047027,0.00005346455,0.045331687,0.00014112762,0.000025223027,0.000015666556,0.0002545868,0.0000019737895,0.000028610613,0.0025969078,0.9508808,0.00017945786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3102389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27692124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69664675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008359339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004008368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73627305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575256104","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1269986","title":"Beauty, the social network","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Sociality; Beauty; Contemplation; Aesthetics; Aesthetic value; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.02967625898053613,"score_gpt":0.2264034633618374,"score_spread":0.19672720438130126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2575256104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03503194,0.001428903,0.00021706357,0.24474844,0.0050213053,0.00024419595,0.0000047827534,0.000020269237,0.71328306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768512,0.000005913956,0.000028917928,0.0039884886,0.01887282,6.7003e-7,0.0000015244975,0.000012425619,0.0002380133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993754,0.000004486766,0.00017518914,0.00006322219,0.0001600698,0.00022163501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991954,0.0000109323555,0.0004264252,0.00013447582,0.00020585612,0.000026922982],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003292999,0.00008560246,0.00012280805,0.00009256573,0.002783826,0.00063826184,0.00068360486,0.000026366812,0.00032576526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015109428,0.000060449813,0.0000823693,0.00010720975,0.0001580223,0.0005812619,0.000078934165,0.000117825475,0.00009988867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053640215,0.000004252955,0.08834066,0.000018193867,0.000079797,0.00004506605,0.000070330556,0.000032921165,7.6075844e-7,0.6311979,0.2792461,0.00095860584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002094606,0.0000042410825,0.18356292,0.000023715786,0.00006213724,0.0000021954584,0.000046442092,0.000017843427,3.9368462e-7,0.3154312,0.5005436,0.00009589565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001534385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0101052215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9418193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028287915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006995439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586999247","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1286886","title":"Critical Notice of <i>Beyond the Analytic-Continental Divide: Pluralist Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century</i>. Edited by Jeffrey A. Bell, Andrew Cutrofello, and Paul M. Livingston (New York: Routledge, 2016. 334 + viii pp)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Analytic philosophy; Notice; Political philosophy; Continental philosophy; Ontology; Personhood; Meaning (existential); Politics; Agency (philosophy); Contemporary philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.040745096591124866,"score_gpt":0.25842399026233626,"score_spread":0.2176788936712114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586999247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18415901,0.047893584,0.000039463946,0.56590796,0.01343535,0.0012729823,0.0017380466,0.000030496478,0.1855231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899842,0.000578827,0.00001946141,0.0031917307,0.0056390315,0.0000032672926,0.000020332085,0.00003745427,0.000525707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762774,0.0002568455,0.0008242845,0.00029197126,0.0004357544,0.00056338654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969233,0.00072402577,0.0007642423,0.00062487734,0.00040444397,0.0005591089],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011160835,0.00035151982,0.0006526615,0.00021094334,0.0014925357,0.0006029077,0.0012131215,0.00017202766,0.00018810316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006997149,0.00023410804,0.00030319608,0.000077528224,0.0027551888,0.0006600597,0.00007372646,0.0010734656,0.000012847862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016739022,0.00033947363,0.010566019,0.00041095066,0.0004918796,0.00032511962,0.051824912,0.0000061045034,0.000108854394,0.48241833,0.45247936,0.0008615889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002553771,0.0006899167,0.0033275844,0.0009850787,0.0007486256,0.00015387461,0.003636928,0.000038501807,0.00008641529,0.16005845,0.8269932,0.00072764663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009881974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051047374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8058252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077126904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041280375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596494602","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1301776","title":"Hobbes’s agnostic theology before <i>Leviathan</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Agnosticism; Philosophy; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Existence of God; Epistemology; Faith; Subject (documents); Atheism; Reflexive pronoun; Theism","score_opus":0.048130816466386256,"score_gpt":0.2460425757805446,"score_spread":0.19791175931415833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596494602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09089532,0.0016637059,0.000013613892,0.101775855,0.007653501,0.00020521918,0.00032040602,0.000020645562,0.79745173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866358,0.000020488833,0.0000263587,0.003390018,0.008694587,0.000002081316,0.000005543857,0.000026340505,0.0011987891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986344,0.000063692096,0.000443065,0.0001591914,0.00020012769,0.000499533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977963,0.00009220065,0.00037333288,0.00043814234,0.00026486622,0.0010351725],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021720948,0.00020408283,0.00037089156,0.00019071564,0.001052771,0.00031936288,0.0008856417,0.00009317419,0.0033078375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046188178,0.0001579709,0.00029226317,0.000017626939,0.0011813162,0.0003846269,0.000037678055,0.00043444024,0.00025794882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015888292,0.000028257273,0.0010241148,0.000019615767,0.00006791405,0.0003545697,0.0012825038,8.661323e-7,0.0000027180877,0.99250025,0.0038331558,0.0008701285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036058848,0.00025984476,0.0009357533,0.00009509411,0.00005401553,0.00008467534,0.00003190868,0.0000027416788,0.0000132205305,0.68811506,0.30990747,0.000139604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001547237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009588632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89574045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067743924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003277317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619014913","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1332946","title":"Critical Notice: James A Harris’ <i>Hume: an intellectual biography</i>, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Notice; Scholarship; Opposition (politics); Philosophy; Politics; Classics; Sociology; Epistemology; Art history; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.03594287324915052,"score_gpt":0.30276639797993304,"score_spread":0.2668235247307825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619014913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05424222,0.0016180073,0.00052682654,0.047347255,0.0029889909,0.00021576411,0.0009148829,0.000031605203,0.89211446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955676,0.00010657992,0.0002707814,0.0007418718,0.0019032605,2.6281006e-7,0.0000039097986,0.0000110357505,0.0013946804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984805,0.00023338918,0.00024035083,0.00017634396,0.0003471283,0.000522282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967043,0.00023826025,0.00023830065,0.00031670436,0.0007005149,0.0018019344],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004554764,0.00014925412,0.00025849845,0.00024862797,0.0024412188,0.0003417768,0.0010090343,0.00013041285,0.00008429779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019033117,0.00016075332,0.00019597521,0.00013155291,0.0047768196,0.0010072849,0.000029946455,0.00040734606,0.000018691235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002315686,0.000026038093,0.0023579595,0.0000070562614,0.00004150346,0.00040050654,0.00046951155,0.0000017688752,0.00000538174,0.908674,0.08785908,0.00013406192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026344316,0.00015258841,0.002424208,0.000056728913,0.00009260784,0.000052743308,0.0011309593,0.000006240968,0.000018238336,0.00059055886,0.99496883,0.00024285256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.092706904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009981159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9413254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022828503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007642178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99885744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735266767","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1341781","title":"Epistemic buck-passing and the interpersonal view of testimony","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"York University","keywords":"Testimonial; Epistemology; Reductionism; Philosophy; Interpersonal communication; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.07887050824485706,"score_gpt":0.26424391813652787,"score_spread":0.1853734098916708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735266767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37140694,0.024431802,0.00008790256,0.18383148,0.006639337,0.00040775147,0.00018016483,0.000011904224,0.41300273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997432,0.000056995657,0.00006179639,0.0007709831,0.0012771442,7.969378e-7,5.590217e-7,0.0000109948405,0.00038873678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924564,0.00008397884,0.00033043808,0.00007758366,0.00010772981,0.00015462273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985773,0.00016307754,0.0005628728,0.00022374412,0.00026910738,0.00020388771],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062197214,0.000102724705,0.00032645208,0.00009343332,0.00074331654,0.00020153912,0.00038304448,0.000044552202,0.00010241541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029070547,0.00006776371,0.00014637175,0.0000093203735,0.003139807,0.00022160154,0.00001847388,0.0003384078,0.000004212984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029685729,0.000008307959,0.001130307,0.00010456298,0.00011612326,0.000045313674,0.018159524,7.5989703e-7,0.00002539916,0.9747281,0.00089894497,0.004752942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015273743,0.00020001897,0.0014839395,0.00095533655,0.00019901586,0.00018680118,0.001439699,0.00003855912,0.00004869425,0.9063108,0.08740224,0.00020751297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004488973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018554205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6260251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029897943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038243542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740630344","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1353880","title":"Justice in migration","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legitimacy; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Immigration; Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Balance (ability); Emigration; Global justice; Democratic legitimacy; Political economy; Law and economics; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Social science; Psychology","score_opus":0.060785434726125166,"score_gpt":0.33280473564376145,"score_spread":0.27201930091763626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740630344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7690015,0.0005497485,0.00020981292,0.037680484,0.002507646,0.00015154513,0.0000094907655,0.000005250599,0.18988456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761236,0.00008925194,0.00011918822,0.00023602565,0.0015316803,7.845843e-7,0.0000013594077,0.000004076896,0.00040525317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932885,0.000074403004,0.00022007212,0.00005994963,0.00016335312,0.00015335424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990627,0.000021463406,0.00026376668,0.0001229571,0.0002360844,0.00029299193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057321915,0.00005113784,0.000095606876,0.00021559442,0.0007739148,0.00021014178,0.00030387443,0.00006958173,0.0001594247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093407434,0.00004842574,0.00005016526,0.00006712105,0.00015250173,0.0007278576,0.0000021880417,0.00013811328,0.000018593235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002342412,0.000031589185,0.07986806,0.000022284066,0.000020791793,0.00011740213,0.055922393,0.000053629636,0.00020672753,0.82980496,0.025177188,0.008751524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071503787,0.00017792091,0.109016515,0.000245241,0.00006421071,0.000014835672,0.0036268577,0.00012366787,0.00018062227,0.22255774,0.6629821,0.00029524596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06107784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.900629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83955115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019432274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013141456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9451745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740894114","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1357993","title":"Fictionalism about musical works","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Musicology and Musical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Wollongong; Victoria University of Wellington; Australian National University; University of Victoria","keywords":"Musical; Naturalism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Analytic philosophy; Musical analysis; Contemporary philosophy; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.05369860264010964,"score_gpt":0.23894119857908463,"score_spread":0.185242595938975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740894114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26009324,0.00086031697,0.00004813738,0.05586913,0.006499452,0.000082961255,0.0000631064,0.000011509256,0.6764721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98854643,0.000008136267,0.000029318111,0.0026144905,0.0071894852,0.0000011182683,0.0000027182864,0.000008899098,0.0015993987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992903,0.000027040463,0.0002557581,0.000096577416,0.00012345343,0.00020690617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987089,0.00003465142,0.0002846658,0.00024191839,0.00024350536,0.00048636354],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017074576,0.00009758234,0.00021691974,0.00019503672,0.0013560785,0.0004316406,0.00044242217,0.00006957679,0.01056605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014144462,0.00007935387,0.00022832298,0.000014706337,0.0006801267,0.00037066694,0.000014267204,0.00031824736,0.00009779607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013881373,0.000022282378,0.0004018884,0.0000061823675,0.00015300499,0.00027142017,0.0029314861,0.000008191276,0.0000053367307,0.94828504,0.0429442,0.0049570794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033563338,0.00007439873,0.0056840447,0.00008889212,0.000106249485,0.00003558125,0.000112123336,0.000016870386,0.000003588715,0.13873388,0.8546669,0.00014184846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026821024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060698107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8117227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000430009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029176855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762494388","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1386481","title":"Human rights without human supremacism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Declaration; Environmental ethics; Subjectivity; Embodied cognition; Hierarchy; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16397043137684764,"score_gpt":0.4922745909166849,"score_spread":0.32830415953983727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762494388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28464064,0.00015103897,0.000041044575,0.035634506,0.003615653,0.0002958134,0.000019765315,0.000016548498,0.675585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99037725,0.0000021174367,0.00031638303,0.0024704097,0.004625399,0.0000042029683,0.000002305679,0.0000339737,0.002167964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684966,0.0010104423,0.00085093576,0.00018729654,0.0005022583,0.00059942185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994728,0.00045302586,0.001467897,0.00087125105,0.0006897374,0.0017900325],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004186452,0.0001779036,0.00041350795,0.00030030246,0.013371148,0.000079475874,0.0013563432,0.00042693492,0.00217755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033162942,0.0001511719,0.00013515347,0.000050489736,0.00077732815,0.00058195594,0.00006247528,0.0061131543,0.00035611534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017093413,0.000033777975,0.05766548,0.0001553869,0.00012802484,0.0010680681,0.0031701613,9.944196e-7,0.00041761747,0.89230114,0.044931497,0.00011074473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011419932,0.00014455295,0.020801218,0.0007186993,0.00007032279,0.000049590897,0.00012142584,0.000001498486,0.00002703061,0.85385996,0.1228724,0.000191293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020138014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.119273685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7057366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033054437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014530483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777563286","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1414524","title":"Intention as action under development: why intention is not a mental state","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University at Buffalo; University of New England","keywords":"Action (physics); Tadpole (physics); Mental state; Psychology; Action theory (sociology); State (computer science); Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.11498616642278349,"score_gpt":0.293840096776608,"score_spread":0.17885393035382452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777563286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97235256,0.000048691305,0.0005828338,0.015528723,0.0028901515,0.00012842668,0.000026254422,0.000010051382,0.008432308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99583244,0.00003417695,0.00006419993,0.0029943152,0.00017606125,0.0000015083823,0.0000016795884,0.000014807052,0.0008808357],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893963,0.000043228272,0.00032755945,0.00017802084,0.00025972122,0.00025182345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987809,0.000010732603,0.0004549928,0.00019563737,0.00012146507,0.00043629506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016658251,0.00012656703,0.00013482917,0.0002922849,0.00076876185,0.00024637007,0.00042452398,0.0000489007,0.00036720908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001968733,0.00011611311,0.00011402472,0.000072768635,0.00015558413,0.0009053183,0.000025584057,0.00023550383,0.0001735798],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005840916,0.00031097326,0.011835249,0.0001825028,0.00025365778,0.0017749472,0.009498017,0.000039466137,0.7379996,0.035002913,0.027016938,0.17550164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026571783,0.0006235206,0.049566306,0.0007500028,0.00006587551,0.0012165549,0.000342256,0.00018380514,0.621588,0.20491774,0.11726597,0.0008228035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016016095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043620667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17467885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002565692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041752282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59127724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789692057","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1415105","title":"Integration and authority: rescuing the ‘one thought too many’ problem","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Epistemology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Sociology","score_opus":0.09115655659884588,"score_gpt":0.2551344071805182,"score_spread":0.16397785058167236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789692057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13961351,0.0040025394,0.0013455511,0.23418479,0.0057026753,0.000657918,0.000099553254,0.00004721709,0.61434627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914235,0.000020487782,0.0002985982,0.0008048332,0.0058884397,0.0000016122083,0.0000029511286,0.0000115126,0.0015480637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992976,0.00006781996,0.00026325718,0.00008893511,0.00013368606,0.0001486981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990274,0.00004544934,0.0001745974,0.00012435997,0.0004436214,0.00018458672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006215857,0.00008154727,0.00011755666,0.00015483484,0.00075917394,0.0002917108,0.00015840947,0.000050570918,0.00020901758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000970514,0.000057257148,0.000046961406,0.000040755367,0.0005754277,0.0003018628,0.000006794308,0.00031339508,0.000018887671],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008995282,0.000005708398,0.00004147656,0.000016569309,0.000023260796,0.000004716823,0.039333105,3.750784e-7,0.000104733306,0.94990736,0.005898484,0.004655226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022639241,0.00023923884,0.0006134595,0.00022092569,0.00008628336,0.000038745264,0.0041433005,0.00006583841,0.0002526149,0.4951556,0.49879742,0.0001601722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019941246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050263226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053572927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023545322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.967067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794797568","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2018.1445174","title":"Hylomorphism without forms? A critical notice of Simon Evnine’s <i>Making Objects and Events</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Semiotics and Representation Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"University of Victoria","keywords":"Theme (computing); Notice; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05030037909274339,"score_gpt":0.28774251438140136,"score_spread":0.23744213528865799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794797568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7540922,0.0030329167,0.00010532249,0.011190931,0.0029617571,0.00021418802,0.000096729775,0.000011732737,0.22829422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973145,0.000013691775,0.0001348406,0.000752866,0.001634361,5.7897165e-7,5.93561e-7,0.000013129631,0.00013544342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991894,0.000027674014,0.00033415997,0.00009128874,0.00016928262,0.00018820078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988064,0.000103991704,0.0001835287,0.00009122471,0.0005848778,0.00022996226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016892052,0.00010137741,0.00024122094,0.00021398417,0.00030777266,0.000056551627,0.00011109022,0.00003295847,0.00023573023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022965357,0.000079380785,0.00007259303,0.00003922211,0.00070042256,0.00018819424,0.000016680786,0.00012773783,0.000006938507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001116414,0.00007450765,0.028715149,0.00022465922,0.0003918989,0.00015893053,0.07475364,0.00000754616,0.00021942228,0.8867067,0.007702209,0.00093369355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035215341,0.0028993287,0.0116791185,0.0021842895,0.00078786776,0.00034333015,0.021478906,0.00027486327,0.0012273244,0.7932783,0.16123448,0.0010906775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062047446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010468501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2432223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026385775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016903035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58416694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800499407","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2018.1463798","title":"Children’s rights and the non-identity problem","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European Commission","keywords":"Identity (music); Identifiability; Disadvantaged; Complaint; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01621547588621094,"score_gpt":0.29316536310793995,"score_spread":0.27694988722172903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800499407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8412119,0.006533736,0.000092151684,0.099876076,0.001295384,0.0005897388,0.000023460158,0.000007921162,0.050369617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99057513,0.000058416776,0.00041859198,0.0024743518,0.006320802,0.0000011228142,0.0000012913567,0.000009734146,0.00014058227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910414,0.000059536233,0.0003122418,0.00009728875,0.0002186191,0.0002081835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983912,0.00005568405,0.00015369289,0.00016949236,0.00047101572,0.0007588961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008055145,0.00008995462,0.00024393304,0.00017686532,0.00029857468,0.00004850937,0.0001563765,0.00010236513,0.00008552181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013823228,0.000053722775,0.00008269138,0.00016430218,0.00063868606,0.00014005242,0.000012016829,0.0006054986,0.00001923814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074804353,0.00009762469,0.24746093,0.0005307063,0.0008076322,0.0014968144,0.029292926,0.0000017710939,0.000028761471,0.6608137,0.053274747,0.00544634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00612877,0.0013354947,0.074991465,0.00052613317,0.00037995618,0.0027490489,0.00007881829,0.000028884657,0.00007546983,0.84364104,0.06980092,0.00026398274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018004961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016838595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18282737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007162008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092993036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9885342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806181184","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2018.1472516","title":"What kind of evaluative states are emotions? The attitudinal theory vs. the perceptual theory of emotions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Perception; Dilemma; Psychology; Argument (complex analysis); Self-perception theory; Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Cognitive dissonance","score_opus":0.08401052726712095,"score_gpt":0.34444532903827285,"score_spread":0.2604348017711519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806181184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797967,0.0014329953,0.00033212668,0.011256974,0.002194008,0.00029584908,0.00020473986,0.000004270387,0.0044823424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980866,0.000040799427,0.00006525283,0.00051827077,0.00071525795,0.00000574539,0.000005045086,0.00002164366,0.0005414339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773693,0.0009892031,0.00056707114,0.0001564298,0.0002615899,0.0002887527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725634,0.00037036923,0.0006288995,0.00048614907,0.0010122505,0.00024598985],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017422553,0.00016932297,0.00030610297,0.0003034191,0.00044687546,0.00004698681,0.000590124,0.00009523645,0.005384655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017343632,0.00009967724,0.00026612091,0.00034096936,0.0021247969,0.00024934043,0.000025054618,0.00041440863,0.00006356286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038279907,0.0003947113,0.014932038,0.000031154566,0.0009187865,0.000075477285,0.08835789,0.00007019471,0.0003122531,0.86309206,0.015670424,0.015762191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010686906,0.0016906236,0.5698861,0.00051344646,0.0006516407,0.00032566133,0.07748137,0.000006060862,0.00014335827,0.34521037,0.002780279,0.00024244227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044533148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026609125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55495405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084003055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045878245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883514089","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2018.1492837","title":"Succeeding competently: towards an anti-luck condition for achievement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Epistemology; Psychology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.10222320331851563,"score_gpt":0.2989897489072842,"score_spread":0.19676654558876855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883514089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84440225,0.00054093276,0.00059274805,0.02164526,0.011341217,0.00051617844,0.00062426535,0.000033193443,0.120303966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98846626,0.000005761838,0.00031312575,0.0016637169,0.009267513,0.0000027205308,0.000027872362,0.00002187175,0.0002311443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990457,0.000047152167,0.00035596604,0.00012477441,0.00013968482,0.00028668376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835896,0.000033915177,0.0002693676,0.00012332437,0.0007801439,0.0004342992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046983932,0.00013103634,0.00026572472,0.0002435231,0.0005791121,0.00014529802,0.00023700087,0.000062341926,0.00038123137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047714024,0.00011954183,0.0001548889,0.000028596824,0.0006696094,0.00038347073,0.000006448622,0.00020382392,0.000019089202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020097328,0.000038024067,0.00041899728,0.00005016698,0.00011006228,0.000017981354,0.012442847,0.000002700847,0.000223208,0.98165816,0.0040632877,0.0009544814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011107596,0.00213285,0.0011026369,0.00015842571,0.00015855071,0.000036560756,0.0024811954,0.000054464133,0.00069727656,0.45803457,0.53369486,0.00033783846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014542241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021430084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5296316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089716756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046114772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897409790","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2018.1521695","title":"Re-reading Anscombe on ‘I’","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reading (process); Philosophy; Term (time); Syntax; Linguistics; Point (geometry); Epistemology; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.05885916568179712,"score_gpt":0.32513531997949646,"score_spread":0.26627615429769935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897409790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032740522,0.00009833451,0.00004028342,0.06034564,0.0020414502,0.000110171524,0.000025447516,0.000020688436,0.90457743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851551,0.0000047673952,0.00016042772,0.0050776033,0.009296744,9.46998e-7,8.5995424e-7,0.000024241714,0.00027929054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980736,0.00020891159,0.00039185066,0.00016933648,0.00046921513,0.0006870822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968576,0.00015282581,0.00018399618,0.00023024881,0.0004461348,0.0021292274],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007623769,0.00015112868,0.00025365507,0.00053478533,0.0007508793,0.00011820496,0.00061338785,0.00013662654,0.0011055355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010178286,0.00014763673,0.00017009545,0.00042137672,0.0010914876,0.00031675774,0.000010539637,0.0003662669,0.0005236268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018816265,0.000021182082,0.0011220818,0.0000054751686,0.000034868062,0.0001948724,0.0058476636,0.0000024914452,0.00002299165,0.9773505,0.014546215,0.00083286624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003267749,0.00058274186,0.00045628368,0.000173185,0.000025709764,0.000010575037,0.00059756124,0.0000027602828,0.0002506012,0.7317078,0.26562476,0.0002412562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007257621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030516783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9524146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047650476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017535692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962293539","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2019.1619354","title":"Is children’s wellbeing different from adults’ wellbeing?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; York University","funders":"European Research Council; York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Psychology; Well-being; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.01732302339000507,"score_gpt":0.20149303184762307,"score_spread":0.184170008457618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962293539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9109712,0.0009009915,0.0000040347063,0.013806687,0.002140808,0.00013755688,0.000312255,0.000012718518,0.071713716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99057037,0.000030143872,0.000015833784,0.0047176867,0.004361198,0.0000011643872,0.000017940794,0.000042509248,0.00024316851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847716,0.00007123736,0.00051399216,0.00023321816,0.00031975546,0.00038465235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982641,0.00011267362,0.00030590137,0.00031170304,0.00023266116,0.0007730083],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019443626,0.00025313025,0.0004157007,0.00032478606,0.00028499708,0.0002163367,0.0005371089,0.00012418772,0.007915581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037466194,0.0002068322,0.00033362425,0.00004064494,0.00028706944,0.00026299467,0.000027676495,0.00078319304,0.0003595734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054541193,0.000038344777,0.007964685,0.000025443442,0.00026548418,0.000061054016,0.011063985,0.0000033302188,0.00004690583,0.9792905,0.0008165119,0.00036924437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087271776,0.00022059972,0.0048854505,0.0004195763,0.00007102511,0.00001553342,0.00019309318,0.000024258996,0.00010991069,0.9694811,0.023390692,0.0003160329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005774919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005115373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07959913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011077142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029358713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981423145","doi":"10.1017/can.2019.11","title":"Publicity, reciprocity, and incentives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Incentive; Law and economics; Criticism; Economic Justice; Norm of reciprocity; Reciprocal; Political science; Economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Microeconomics; Psychology; Philosophy; Social capital","score_opus":0.04397690624457164,"score_gpt":0.2958030668376698,"score_spread":0.2518261605930982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981423145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34650165,0.0006052708,0.000010821459,0.07654488,0.00093892013,0.00011810479,0.0000150217065,0.000008500042,0.5752568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99658453,0.000050296636,0.00008581495,0.0019997882,0.0010024317,3.378286e-7,4.8693306e-7,0.0000074151826,0.00026890368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890226,0.00014851193,0.00021825382,0.000102360864,0.00027238787,0.00035622666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982365,0.00015026754,0.00011515563,0.00009172225,0.000263335,0.0011430248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008977747,0.00007918559,0.00017581992,0.00022626773,0.00031666987,0.00012816093,0.0002928335,0.00013611001,0.0003125851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005957076,0.00007624315,0.00007323616,0.00020435677,0.0006041913,0.00050306955,0.00001877672,0.0004016766,0.000052960324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005087807,0.0000071627646,0.015740393,0.000012723844,0.000016906604,0.000019316727,0.0030248754,5.4579505e-7,0.00001010244,0.98019564,0.00046922467,0.0004980448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020469706,0.000076821954,0.004355475,0.00005746966,0.000010511542,0.000010583388,0.00040981488,0.0000013369256,0.000013205381,0.9109389,0.08381534,0.000105822706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007094769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010349614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6500829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014229304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015387551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981484090","doi":"10.1017/can.2019.8","title":"Is Canada Entitled to the Arctic?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Situated; The arctic; Arctic; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Ecology","score_opus":0.024767227844905305,"score_gpt":0.2682169670677531,"score_spread":0.2434497392228478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981484090","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04838815,0.00048119968,0.000006478038,0.6752794,0.0018841238,0.00017046406,0.000019652074,0.0000023041755,0.27376825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98221105,0.000015188063,0.000030514404,0.012828923,0.0011649514,6.590314e-7,1.07856266e-7,0.0000057680454,0.0037428502],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991634,0.00005516209,0.00015168074,0.0000644393,0.0002609038,0.0003044111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989832,0.00005551241,0.00008485118,0.0001144526,0.00013799401,0.00062399445],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029736204,0.000060370807,0.00011888223,0.000078239325,0.00045243982,0.00003562168,0.00035044458,0.00002654173,0.001589497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018274492,0.000041069867,0.00006264219,0.00019091487,0.00010128528,0.000058889425,0.0000108515305,0.00013702404,0.00015458402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007962721,0.000004444888,0.042806294,0.000011360569,0.0001238887,0.000063263564,0.03560236,0.00001588525,0.0000022845184,0.105872095,0.81476086,0.00072928774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008409725,0.000027208976,0.006911707,0.00003002681,0.000012222248,0.0000052915266,0.0021647399,4.5294283e-7,0.0000045095694,0.010297891,0.98039526,0.00006660421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9656776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9338229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041952936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051236814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982282514","doi":"10.1017/can.2019.3","title":"Moral Understanding and Cooperative Testimony","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Morality; Epistemology; Moral disengagement; Moral reasoning; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1488294891675281,"score_gpt":0.24871565293418713,"score_spread":0.09988616376665901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982282514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29046014,0.0025104296,0.0000917619,0.016499512,0.0039785425,0.0002451621,0.00008885982,0.00001395492,0.6861116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969695,0.000009634587,0.00005540394,0.00095839327,0.0008720417,3.1876516e-7,0.0000015649686,0.0000120255445,0.0011210955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942994,0.00004305012,0.0001917427,0.000082831,0.000083438725,0.00016900663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992549,0.000079446494,0.00012246633,0.00007767447,0.00017573449,0.0002897818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019344968,0.000094022944,0.00020619898,0.00016102684,0.00021779664,0.000115483985,0.00009903303,0.00004308296,0.00043157523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044425484,0.000079956604,0.0000571509,0.000025681098,0.00044907205,0.0002367787,0.000005754526,0.00021812045,0.000031289248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005631206,0.0000044497224,0.0024140377,0.000020469159,0.00004426634,0.0000415177,0.010179998,0.000010169574,0.000016485124,0.9857633,0.0014410485,0.000058589496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060917164,0.00047657164,0.0002695991,0.00015283837,0.000053412623,0.000069713096,0.005102374,0.00003748683,0.00002557705,0.9472259,0.045760185,0.00021716839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009503039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012851341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70650935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009087333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039410536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71713495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982651615","doi":"10.1017/can.2019.37","title":"What Is a Pain in a Body Part?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Reading; University of Oxford","keywords":"Qualia; Naturalism; Perception; Epistemology; Psychology; Sensation; Mind–body problem; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy of mind; Pain sensation; Physicalism; Philosophy; Direct and indirect realism; Cognitive science; Metaphysics; Consciousness; Medicine","score_opus":0.07271390465904777,"score_gpt":0.2590051727494752,"score_spread":0.18629126809042745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982651615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9345288,0.00045631296,0.0000033703686,0.055711877,0.0022477382,0.0000974741,0.000009085499,0.0000028579716,0.0069424585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98006636,0.000066565786,0.000019248251,0.019245148,0.0002675929,9.618578e-7,3.7785495e-7,0.000007389073,0.0003263629],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905235,0.00012255729,0.00025410706,0.00015307855,0.0001655341,0.00025238085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992883,0.00006083956,0.00011231781,0.00012362807,0.00003136714,0.00038353677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044117513,0.00008624921,0.00015333005,0.0002928383,0.000040861305,0.000051367642,0.00027073282,0.00005371393,0.00083796476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008541851,0.000077012905,0.00008248861,0.0001794414,0.00007221898,0.0003994219,0.0000072212765,0.0002386366,0.00029851918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009876617,0.0014495682,0.2032079,0.00036675186,0.0001977338,0.019729616,0.013177109,0.0008199049,0.13192403,0.17684875,0.34150368,0.10978727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004450052,0.0026017837,0.024177937,0.0017261194,0.000022085647,0.0012408395,0.00043357245,0.00024643488,0.01060671,0.46469712,0.48896855,0.0008287886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011976567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003583029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28784835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008838469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024340907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91751266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989878489","doi":"10.1017/can.2019.41","title":"Platonic Laws of Nature","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Problem of universals; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Naturalism; Natural law","score_opus":0.010588698415726346,"score_gpt":0.2608628690152051,"score_spread":0.25027417059947876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989878489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41843063,0.0013064957,0.0000104744295,0.0038208792,0.001942327,0.00007822904,0.000038002516,0.0000031435936,0.5743698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985392,0.0000023829027,0.00005441132,0.0008540499,0.0003756202,4.5182907e-7,7.516967e-7,0.000009967066,0.00016317428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990141,0.00006268639,0.0003203881,0.0001320406,0.00018522392,0.00028557482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873775,0.000084443825,0.0002236784,0.0002625522,0.00013023546,0.0005613319],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033858846,0.00009966801,0.00024574154,0.00023582131,0.00004083174,0.00001172477,0.0005318012,0.00019004145,0.0035760943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006507833,0.00008219868,0.0001517442,0.00028222147,0.00027426117,0.000114435,0.00001033904,0.0005643946,0.00022758922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032600874,0.000017867063,0.0026458616,0.000008551268,0.000039806404,0.000100093224,0.0003049087,0.000005428546,0.00020643737,0.99582875,0.0004506062,0.00035906528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005810169,0.0003989717,0.007151775,0.0000853532,0.000021210733,0.00020970865,0.000052327843,0.0000035559387,0.0003886841,0.97770786,0.013264194,0.00013531398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021732859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001665496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5801086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004944713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035399938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995142335","doi":"10.1017/can.2019.43","title":"Achievement and Enhancement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of Oxford; Somerville College, University of Oxford; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Reading (process); Philosophy; Psychology; Positive economics; Linguistics; Economics; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.06854186054116775,"score_gpt":0.24859732501354878,"score_spread":0.18005546447238102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995142335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96169966,0.00018600276,0.000021249978,0.018290391,0.0008305325,0.00006973152,0.0000049339183,0.0000017282699,0.018895768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945704,0.000025189005,0.00009613652,0.0047995863,0.00015268686,5.449085e-7,2.5398313e-7,0.000004421642,0.00035080634],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993894,0.000028401404,0.00017488537,0.0001121122,0.00013476686,0.00016042999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943733,0.000021296442,0.00009355845,0.00007692693,0.000025892978,0.00034498336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012481798,0.00006619545,0.000106048145,0.00013370898,0.00006088154,0.000017807792,0.00014308674,0.000025415813,0.00042899395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024352104,0.000055543227,0.0000383092,0.000058297483,0.00007373181,0.00009906943,0.000008959329,0.00011944444,0.00014816265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022043289,0.00032467284,0.04687355,0.000115904964,0.00009904341,0.0010000224,0.0013629848,0.00010150614,0.50291157,0.40973714,0.01781393,0.019439235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005800758,0.0048046606,0.08464771,0.00054619694,0.00006512313,0.0016934024,0.00014661322,0.000066951274,0.13987967,0.39831153,0.36305574,0.0009816382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005997785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005603693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3630319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050276147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000116835756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46971828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996211725","doi":"10.1017/can.2019.45","title":"Unity in the Scientific Study of Intellectual Attention","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Epistemology; Psychology; Intellectual development; Task (project management); Cognition; Position (finance); Sociology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Management; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.20853470557874945,"score_gpt":0.34600865003832243,"score_spread":0.13747394445957298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996211725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962033,0.00003223077,2.6892957e-7,0.0015847868,0.00089733506,0.0001723766,0.000004306342,0.0000011561293,0.0011042506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959797,0.0000012266139,0.0000012244105,0.0002447166,0.000049610935,7.993836e-7,1.3504314e-7,0.0000033849467,0.00010094311],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990739,0.00020497522,0.0002577476,0.00012618235,0.00019184625,0.0001453147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944556,0.00011151129,0.0001360308,0.00015486,0.00007379879,0.000078251454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038283554,0.00006647371,0.00014002979,0.0003461193,0.00012520552,0.00003109848,0.00040249567,0.000021750004,0.000068492525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018171605,0.00004211795,0.000052739088,0.00055921153,0.00019509425,0.00011891775,0.000012642981,0.00026408213,0.000031807824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015842443,0.0014164507,0.68247724,0.000032572352,0.00002456214,0.000826419,0.030089054,0.00004757746,0.2759483,0.0015347105,0.0050197276,0.0024249542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0074753202,0.013525219,0.8679673,0.00035062982,0.0001886476,0.0010328699,0.027320528,0.000023579556,0.029917268,0.04347922,0.007873487,0.0008459284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048588926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053868773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24603103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003481758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009407112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3006004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999564241","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2000.10717535","title":"David Cummiskey, Kantian Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press1996. Pp. xiv + 192.<sup>1</sup>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Philosophy; General interest; Content (measure theory); Contemporary philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03695892807462151,"score_gpt":0.2668828796368124,"score_spread":0.2299239515621909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999564241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11664494,0.0009469783,0.000050792984,0.11290779,0.0008892468,0.000338111,0.0004018278,0.000058851314,0.76776147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991953,0.0005793234,0.00017060435,0.0020306304,0.002223392,5.128278e-7,0.000010633584,0.00002734998,0.0030045363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971448,0.00051447185,0.0004976566,0.00028276216,0.00059279974,0.0009674866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962781,0.00020182386,0.00020805915,0.00031642965,0.00034544416,0.0026501454],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091312214,0.00025398092,0.00041347562,0.000297497,0.0013423339,0.00016259225,0.0010499747,0.00039248387,0.0046157376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003242454,0.0002759171,0.00035591595,0.0004947985,0.001794697,0.0007652546,0.000022927885,0.00095184153,0.00011048145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011054897,0.000069819595,0.0010553286,0.000052460855,0.00018915601,0.0015277048,0.011853423,0.0005661466,0.0000061653077,0.9650643,0.01810411,0.0014008273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005109955,0.00008033749,0.00012099807,0.000108187945,0.000095428644,0.00004357576,0.0008995384,0.000032057153,0.0000129814025,0.22526084,0.7725624,0.0002726636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019937212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011863142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8753081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046840205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038689554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000188277","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2000.10717546","title":"Andrew Kernohan Liberalism, Equality, and Cultural Oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1998. Pp. xiv-130.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Liberalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05078309165074317,"score_gpt":0.29332063120210333,"score_spread":0.24253753955136015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000188277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47523692,0.0028107073,0.000008473073,0.06950713,0.0006957656,0.00021217135,0.00029298308,0.000034355482,0.4512015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98972315,0.000606703,0.000066414876,0.0019053202,0.0017573602,3.283388e-7,0.0000058128244,0.000015085813,0.0059198407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978874,0.0004748425,0.00034870883,0.00022902408,0.00043111324,0.00062895194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970319,0.00015761872,0.0001580474,0.00018611018,0.00023662276,0.0022297017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069247145,0.00019241832,0.00033036433,0.00013454095,0.0010367264,0.0001727745,0.00054095645,0.00027552666,0.00030735874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020985579,0.000184364,0.00016528345,0.00027308697,0.0012095786,0.0008474992,0.00002919543,0.0006936278,0.000042248583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008609124,0.00004461338,0.0011604135,0.000049590413,0.00008488721,0.00087825063,0.0050764214,0.000014230052,0.00003235177,0.9505701,0.040654775,0.0013482784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001295494,0.00018091364,0.006533503,0.0003588659,0.00015203738,0.00014009084,0.0012853454,0.000018797185,0.000061351035,0.061907217,0.9274228,0.00064356934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037595868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007057907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8886629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025676296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012917359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9688129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001094624","doi":"10.1017/can.2019.53","title":"Plato on the Enslavement of Reason","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Ruler; Philosophy; Soul; The Republic; Epistemology; Element (criminal law); Form of the Good; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.09795017232740061,"score_gpt":0.20436842499630928,"score_spread":0.10641825266890867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001094624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07380562,0.0007362737,0.000010378759,0.31269494,0.0009383492,0.00017927797,0.0001697897,0.000008839211,0.6114565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99082303,0.0000051377183,0.000011885977,0.006117312,0.0029433775,7.694362e-7,0.0000012455229,0.000011912494,0.00008535057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992257,0.00004906018,0.0003068009,0.00007796278,0.00019436958,0.00014612525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990343,0.000100317266,0.00020822162,0.000118647666,0.0001310455,0.00040747353],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015139948,0.00010241427,0.00019340182,0.00008020352,0.00016825816,0.00004449,0.0002722925,0.000026804448,0.0015400224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012345228,0.00006495037,0.00016756383,0.000050390914,0.00024746024,0.000076915225,0.000008171485,0.00025794702,0.000055748336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031209114,0.000015185459,0.000024674435,0.000013236527,0.00005526898,0.000047032278,0.0063357414,0.000006715156,0.000023981669,0.97889423,0.013972435,0.0005802826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029542975,0.0005936197,0.000039387593,0.00011597726,0.000038047285,0.0000055737264,0.00044195994,0.000016895194,0.00048152782,0.32437417,0.67348725,0.000110188164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024057637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012473416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9170174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033424738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019419489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001989153","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.32","title":"Learning to Appreciate the Gray Areas: A Critical Notice of Anil Gupta’s “Conscious Experience”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Embodied and Extended Cognition","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; CLARITY; Epistemology; Empiricism; Cognition; Philosophy of science; Foundation (evidence); Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Neuroscience; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.055777457652032285,"score_gpt":0.2759832533655061,"score_spread":0.22020579571347382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001989153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6540318,0.0005288815,0.0008199247,0.16762954,0.0021656356,0.000495011,0.00009568042,0.000051256775,0.17418225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907016,0.0000064523915,0.000115501985,0.008576184,0.00057271164,0.0000028087911,2.906699e-7,0.000014468403,0.000009995152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987037,0.00016797792,0.00035236034,0.00018552147,0.00028439277,0.00030605623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836105,0.0002636028,0.00014736385,0.000114150724,0.00019643374,0.0009173713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018024008,0.00011911942,0.00020441758,0.00014322168,0.00025677742,0.00006629847,0.00044859495,0.000048087735,0.00010373188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005056374,0.00009133352,0.000114878385,0.00038254436,0.00026961512,0.00019694633,0.000022987379,0.0004344192,0.000044300305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006587602,0.00018709229,0.004038758,0.0002713252,0.000072810915,0.003756564,0.15089259,0.0037204584,0.09884504,0.7130285,0.0061611026,0.018367026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003046537,0.006539395,0.0016242124,0.0010834123,0.00035894348,0.0021224173,0.018671365,0.0021415616,0.12447371,0.7829153,0.055228256,0.0017948713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020302286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002851592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33666977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044809265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039115665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6053317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020100236","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.9","title":"Credence: A Belief-First Approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.1280423749139143,"score_gpt":0.23477625197244703,"score_spread":0.10673387705853274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020100236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017812662,0.004311326,0.00035695714,0.102472275,0.002854274,0.00023998135,0.00014078058,0.00003322484,0.87177855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98696256,0.000019810523,0.00027513967,0.0061540175,0.0061606984,0.0000014531479,0.0000042767565,0.000021390319,0.0004006795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905103,0.000052260853,0.00034275796,0.00012842362,0.00017184367,0.00025370705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985137,0.00004534101,0.00021412809,0.000120130746,0.0002873769,0.00081933045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021276706,0.0001342971,0.00028644037,0.00013163738,0.00038358968,0.00012427435,0.00035703395,0.00006916082,0.0005411153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013007352,0.00011909189,0.0001890468,0.000056696706,0.00052614027,0.00022112872,0.000010256382,0.0004981821,0.000071672795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015886886,0.000024637518,0.00031523974,0.000118897784,0.00010921793,0.00014689953,0.06599514,0.000035831126,0.000009830614,0.90697575,0.025925307,0.00032737743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044389794,0.0003733549,0.000074980424,0.00006849459,0.000080568076,0.000055485638,0.0023988592,0.000042689826,0.000020254061,0.12519465,0.87100273,0.00024405982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013355553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070167664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9691499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046671572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063165167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5924833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044690955","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.29","title":"How to Philosophically Tackle Kinds without Talking about “Natural Kinds”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Relevance (law); Natural (archaeology); Politics; Subject (documents); Subject matter; Race (biology); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.0443798572572404,"score_gpt":0.2844933370229579,"score_spread":0.24011347976571754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044690955","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04800211,0.0031989154,0.00017906132,0.8351525,0.0024821365,0.00029626235,0.00003629463,0.000035967485,0.110616736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98260176,0.000022054635,0.0005405695,0.0118866,0.004533827,0.0000029063128,0.0000015968782,0.000020895746,0.0003897902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981962,0.00019232572,0.0003639581,0.00025813442,0.00040075395,0.00058861787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737793,0.0000829093,0.0002494853,0.00014300838,0.00037107294,0.0017755921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048316404,0.00020434812,0.0004348324,0.00022717571,0.00089580263,0.0001941566,0.0007064676,0.00016738982,0.000094885276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010934095,0.00019352738,0.00020523863,0.00049528806,0.0005421133,0.00028721528,0.0000368759,0.00059622375,0.000051026745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048293677,0.00008970264,0.12723528,0.00019530485,0.0012033478,0.004583206,0.22981647,0.000096359676,0.00071827334,0.5257398,0.09631922,0.013520132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013811662,0.0009969975,0.01781488,0.000288619,0.00016885478,0.00013745454,0.0063865758,0.000013284948,0.00013562787,0.11918398,0.85246277,0.0010297783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086542114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012410488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93459964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017430146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013216778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7891817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088070978","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.34","title":"The New Worries about Science","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13709182831084962,"score_gpt":0.4455617313530138,"score_spread":0.30846990304216415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088070978","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039337478,0.0025755214,0.0004192909,0.83211255,0.0033665574,0.0001615457,0.0000048572983,0.000010215398,0.1574157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94909036,0.00009985571,0.00059030787,0.045447007,0.0044285674,0.0000010885582,1.6134553e-7,0.0000138705855,0.00032880125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978118,0.00051012886,0.0005121985,0.00011448136,0.0005603267,0.0004910527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99343604,0.0024646285,0.0004236431,0.00019967201,0.0006086358,0.00286741],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00415831,0.00008245579,0.00015372034,0.000105714535,0.003608366,0.000057931014,0.0010144281,0.00010906877,0.00048285615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037528753,0.000054897686,0.000055201577,0.0005491507,0.0012661158,0.00035666215,0.000044324413,0.0042701326,0.0002989232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049786468,0.000003237906,0.00391428,0.000049355294,0.000028516397,0.00016896705,0.014476816,0.000008338053,0.00012233449,0.7449607,0.23225342,0.0039642253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029104698,0.00008962493,0.0014316126,0.00018036076,0.00001772162,0.000013491138,0.0017494977,0.000013978108,0.000016694992,0.3090097,0.68711174,0.00007453038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013864773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053115305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9451566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021944936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021296244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3103312344","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.39","title":"Failures of Intention and Failed-Art","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Performative utterance; Aesthetics; Luck; Accidental; Focus (optics); Epistemology; Art; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.05893295163836881,"score_gpt":0.20868468609744248,"score_spread":0.14975173445907367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3103312344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3911209,0.0045154924,0.00014715912,0.33948493,0.002519826,0.0002741947,0.00018425072,0.00002724923,0.261726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971039,0.000031497028,0.000053068627,0.001657933,0.0008949096,2.5216315e-7,0.0000017997155,0.000010089573,0.00024650418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994116,0.000027860842,0.00027652644,0.0000679674,0.00010424844,0.00011181003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991432,0.00002089323,0.00016564166,0.000056155597,0.00024904762,0.00036508194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012857656,0.00007496993,0.0001726435,0.00012109601,0.000112198,0.00007042782,0.00011841103,0.000033687684,0.0005218848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085324966,0.00006616928,0.00008384487,0.000018601304,0.00041403592,0.00018271379,0.000007152216,0.0002099732,0.000025201569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019273031,0.000010981474,0.0019541578,0.00009420019,0.000053921405,0.000054144522,0.042526715,0.0000042833008,0.00008067123,0.93556005,0.018812664,0.00082893536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048398456,0.00062542735,0.0003327556,0.00019788266,0.000054686516,0.000023438708,0.003943096,0.000022814076,0.00017384783,0.15216224,0.8418068,0.00017298317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051920954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016553123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8229942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012336297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001573009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92370313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112923268","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.45","title":"Understanding the Problem of “Hype”: Exaggeration, Values, and Trust in Science","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta; Montana State University","keywords":"Exaggeration; Epistemology; Variety (cybernetics); Context (archaeology); Journalism; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Media studies; History; Computer science; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.589016986892307,"score_gpt":0.390232543620996,"score_spread":0.19878444327131095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112923268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48090026,0.0014899423,0.0004840756,0.34923205,0.00026195814,0.00040182789,0.000017260005,0.00000825264,0.16720437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987744,0.00030940952,0.00015371983,0.000604342,0.00014693075,4.2784248e-7,3.9390093e-7,0.0000024028425,0.000007938238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941146,0.000096047486,0.00017662489,0.00004937851,0.00016159307,0.0001049182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941355,0.000049073325,0.00011836872,0.000056445482,0.00011550814,0.00024704478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009483283,0.000032504122,0.00007271036,0.00014076316,0.0004173593,0.00006693274,0.00026103784,0.000022904394,0.00010877845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015352214,0.00002640578,0.000018412215,0.00046986266,0.00070593605,0.00022279222,0.000010038156,0.00011438322,0.0000011820008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017509934,0.000014808507,0.037699223,0.000034382836,0.000008896418,0.000007703681,0.47059134,0.0000966794,0.0010412304,0.48616156,0.0010267544,0.00329992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013165568,0.00036137385,0.03644808,0.00046270076,0.00004123599,0.000024147392,0.17752123,0.0007902391,0.00009291396,0.74791616,0.03465264,0.00037274088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020632024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025962204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5178742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020081614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008394005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99181145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127762900","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.55","title":"Locke on the Motivation to Suspend Desire","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Suspension (topology); Philosophy; Doctrine; Epistemology; Psychology; Theology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1157978964635336,"score_gpt":0.2156160191063443,"score_spread":0.09981812264281069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127762900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09652577,0.00041946865,0.00004151399,0.12034742,0.0024630711,0.00011551248,0.000027985574,0.000007713415,0.7800515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904183,0.000001682488,0.0000215132,0.006363781,0.0017342244,8.880097e-7,8.651224e-7,0.000007407649,0.0014513443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992567,0.000057013705,0.00020455345,0.00009855038,0.0002095877,0.00017365359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989059,0.0001149617,0.00008123045,0.00015264102,0.00032325767,0.00042201256],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019768522,0.000080905986,0.00011447716,0.000143172,0.00052822917,0.00013167848,0.00026652624,0.000022232778,0.0016942817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039077413,0.000055051612,0.00008641602,0.000119809214,0.0001451539,0.00013829811,0.000006962579,0.00020095128,0.00014746703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048208444,0.000011105863,0.000033942277,0.0000030272465,0.000009069834,0.00011841926,0.0041186996,0.000016847505,0.00003488239,0.9809651,0.014368467,0.00031564676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011322114,0.00021643702,0.0002364384,0.00008991567,0.000011740231,0.000030314819,0.00045829365,0.0000034726254,0.00033774268,0.37912348,0.61924684,0.00013211463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017324935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037461296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8938925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001569027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046979974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132377382","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.51","title":"Excuses and Alternatives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; University of Oxford","keywords":"Excuse; Counterexample; Reading (process); Subject (documents); Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05183254116283461,"score_gpt":0.24315855296652003,"score_spread":0.19132601180368541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132377382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9519151,0.0024794664,0.00003131777,0.010579781,0.00078425877,0.000026488033,0.000024543575,0.000004179213,0.03415489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978645,0.00010772159,0.000092962066,0.0013476169,0.00037842948,1.9941159e-7,1.2666148e-7,0.0000062055483,0.00020227439],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994958,0.000045792192,0.00013595626,0.00009591438,0.000094608666,0.00013190878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993554,0.000047734222,0.00007114653,0.000072649105,0.00006135003,0.0003917681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000047373906,0.00005823972,0.00009647548,0.00010838721,0.000092793605,0.000049097216,0.00012567817,0.000018961427,0.00019362224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038234363,0.000050062754,0.000042081087,0.00012097533,0.00011955102,0.00017102255,0.000009596392,0.00011432194,0.000010958819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028518249,0.00009752813,0.030258492,0.00010351777,0.00006347445,0.031659275,0.003828506,0.000051114486,0.4500421,0.44405785,0.009426881,0.030382749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010984737,0.00030482773,0.016404342,0.00026933354,0.000033980723,0.0048897266,0.00016208453,0.00003380496,0.35653186,0.49911705,0.12072004,0.00043446769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012064155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067389035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11129315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018890463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036029393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21200277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134338264","doi":"10.1017/can.2020.58","title":"Critical notice of <i>Words and Contents</i>, by Richard Vallée","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Linguistics and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Section (typography); Philosophy; Plan (archaeology); Linguistics; Epistemology; Computer science; History; Political science; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02894545141164851,"score_gpt":0.23068437681644702,"score_spread":0.2017389254047985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134338264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041877493,0.08327617,0.00017721363,0.020742232,0.0069884593,0.0001176112,0.0011195138,0.0000117953,0.84568954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99692523,0.000046088135,0.00010086481,0.00081960653,0.0011412378,3.420644e-7,0.000002496266,0.000009170175,0.0009549529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933887,0.00003073139,0.00027611016,0.00007729729,0.00012583118,0.00015114406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987205,0.000115591974,0.00008544518,0.00007024115,0.0006777769,0.00033043933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000887871,0.000080475074,0.00023989951,0.000072542316,0.00017317585,0.00005306324,0.00008120865,0.000026679616,0.0006938316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009124444,0.00007063082,0.00007546427,0.000029542343,0.00035196176,0.000051824936,0.00001047099,0.00015163921,0.0000034888674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011833441,0.000043228538,0.0003012629,0.00009521598,0.0001247966,0.0006705958,0.01722011,4.0570177e-7,0.00015035634,0.9425168,0.038390476,0.00047490062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037034223,0.00019911055,0.00006033373,0.00012009986,0.00012882026,0.000042848373,0.0022996974,0.0000036677768,0.00011037573,0.023487493,0.9730177,0.00015953266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013852352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050421576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9550477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036535956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015391769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7596969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175100152","doi":"10.1017/can.2021.8","title":"Group Agents and Moral Status: What Can We Owe to Organizations?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Zürich; University of Oxford; York University","keywords":"Gratitude; Collectivism; Individualism; Collective action; Action (physics); Social psychology; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.07136009597545154,"score_gpt":0.25179041115233675,"score_spread":0.1804303151768852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175100152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7313449,0.018522492,0.00011773213,0.2010621,0.011750138,0.00035952777,0.00051226676,0.00003140952,0.036299422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98945725,0.00047565575,0.0001992674,0.0072932215,0.0016214632,8.5846546e-7,0.000018109144,0.00002464504,0.00090953865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991677,0.000072819246,0.00025824888,0.00012214847,0.00012280807,0.0002562955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834526,0.000036156704,0.00011154725,0.00012885804,0.0006117378,0.0007664321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012261422,0.000112125126,0.00021476859,0.00019286873,0.0003125008,0.0003828114,0.00011469149,0.00004708602,0.0006698255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011760408,0.0001086616,0.000054883152,0.00010297342,0.00021458104,0.00037448475,0.00001553583,0.00023145456,0.00001817132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007720611,0.000039219733,0.0035473618,0.00007602554,0.00015961373,0.00055580965,0.09852321,0.000012718521,0.000054039807,0.88242966,0.011675496,0.0029191426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006084009,0.00024614818,0.0012270128,0.00032953956,0.00010842622,0.0001172946,0.015754567,0.000003580008,0.0000946773,0.3487318,0.63245755,0.00032103385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016729248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.116077706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6207821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008357084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008029594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9000516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175390287","doi":"10.1017/can.2021.15","title":"Sensational Science, Archaic Hominin Genetics, and Amplified Inductive Risk","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Davis; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Max-Planck-Institut für Menschheitsgeschichte; Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover; University of Alberta; Michigan State University; Florida Atlantic University; Eastern Michigan University; Universidad del Atlántico; University of Utah","keywords":"Entertainment; Phenomenon; Population; Ancient DNA; History of science; Genealogy; History; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Demography","score_opus":0.03965290888151631,"score_gpt":0.3016978452288648,"score_spread":0.2620449363473485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175390287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96806216,0.0006556717,0.0000064120545,0.0066693574,0.00076779956,0.000056216246,0.000034878623,0.0000040873992,0.02374339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976233,0.00011054845,0.0011270625,0.00022803109,0.00079960335,7.9543435e-7,0.0000010117656,0.000006834743,0.000102810576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879444,0.0001207744,0.0002330307,0.00016117237,0.00036284828,0.000327753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976927,0.000109811386,0.00021196301,0.00010375659,0.0010037951,0.0008779454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062679325,0.00007970456,0.00013407315,0.0006920073,0.0011902086,0.00021296219,0.00024268361,0.000051977073,0.00029707042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090991304,0.000086090164,0.000076131364,0.000613695,0.0019353282,0.000355437,0.000021147427,0.0003217993,0.000010805005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004376656,0.0001181373,0.18500783,0.00001422663,0.0003299999,0.00069122994,0.06323946,0.000121108584,0.002839489,0.73795104,0.0048971795,0.004746564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006658134,0.00023990894,0.3945107,0.00008768252,0.00011007932,0.00022941799,0.033702973,0.000016471527,0.00059212145,0.5274825,0.041951228,0.00041110697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007349043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24271049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23536144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017765423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039403243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W378956657","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2001.10717576","title":"Semantic Pragmatism and A Priori Knawledge (or ‘Yes we could all be brains in a vat’)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Externalism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Skepticism; Metaphysics; Criticism; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Realism; Internalism and externalism; Proposition; Law","score_opus":0.06221565134566944,"score_gpt":0.3220105297861765,"score_spread":0.2597948784405071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W378956657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5666089,0.0043844273,0.00018370466,0.1586887,0.0015557219,0.00042702875,0.0000455364,0.000020366466,0.2680856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99568236,0.00009046665,0.000115405375,0.0033405996,0.0004273449,0.0000041694984,9.2237804e-7,0.000018191877,0.00032055407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983454,0.00016482816,0.00048489656,0.00024884747,0.0002022027,0.0005538284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822915,0.00021833753,0.00019273732,0.00022794113,0.00007241671,0.0010594008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006173297,0.00018864409,0.00034735288,0.00046587904,0.00010523847,0.00006117869,0.00042097215,0.00015835807,0.0008476266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023739725,0.00015135972,0.000083115985,0.00043147733,0.0004890545,0.00023336869,0.000021875665,0.00049484405,0.00004236143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012757276,0.000092709364,0.0045018024,0.000026949276,0.00006750144,0.0045254403,0.007178063,0.0000022621596,0.000098694094,0.9788936,0.0008808907,0.003604515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016272905,0.00062898715,0.016939607,0.00030163862,0.000045550674,0.0025222308,0.00021158493,0.000040949446,0.00001312966,0.9213696,0.055981994,0.0003174424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009685899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011862572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42907342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013502312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056453014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9280917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W385662602","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2001.10717578","title":"Pleasure, Displeasure, and Representation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Object (grammar); Philosophy of mind; Pain and pleasure; Epistemology; Representation (politics); Philosophy; Skepticism; Neglect; Direct and indirect realism; Psychology; Metaphysics; Realism; Law; Neuroscience; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.17044100637088122,"score_gpt":0.287598708631086,"score_spread":0.11715770226020478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W385662602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9517353,0.00044000387,0.00008808757,0.02161714,0.0007205559,0.000063798994,0.000009716171,0.000005650409,0.025319738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99714506,0.00008455671,0.000065426444,0.0021869896,0.00036714654,5.939827e-7,5.4540226e-7,0.0000064448636,0.00014324921],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928665,0.00006315333,0.0001910893,0.00012761036,0.00016679341,0.00016470782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925673,0.000041195766,0.00010806717,0.0000838943,0.00005629636,0.00045378853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013775444,0.000070951086,0.00010865633,0.00018972835,0.00013325489,0.000029335888,0.00014118971,0.000038053036,0.00011480269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022231402,0.00006212145,0.000049560556,0.0001554016,0.00015170495,0.00019558889,0.000005424269,0.00015285349,0.00002732435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007880506,0.00036426148,0.45112404,0.00007174714,0.00014250472,0.010546137,0.002113656,0.0004697936,0.11406251,0.27594632,0.075480275,0.06889069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002512379,0.00067226164,0.37294847,0.00017084918,0.000054632495,0.009002178,0.00008744451,0.00006789547,0.0064123822,0.51779014,0.08981042,0.00047092477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024574623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042268113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24184383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003636396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011290679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2533239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214612385","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2010.0008","title":"From the Editorial Office","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Science and Climate Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Operations research; Editorial board; Variety (cybernetics); Public relations; Library science; Business; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.011648574809973984,"score_gpt":0.2147547730234939,"score_spread":0.20310619821351994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214612385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8952075,0.00007773968,0.0000026801742,0.01259041,0.05208746,0.00004276327,0.00002204629,0.0000029307014,0.039966434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95849496,0.0000037868483,0.00009316663,0.00067950063,0.040698763,4.074075e-7,4.042005e-7,0.000003861564,0.00002515448],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935186,0.000015135399,0.00013521384,0.00007803388,0.00024799356,0.00017178782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994051,0.000072071074,0.000086234504,0.00013598696,0.000022006909,0.00027859682],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026512274,0.000059435715,0.0000751479,0.000018965024,0.00025536315,0.00004552292,0.00048800893,0.000038894286,0.0018172244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017007077,0.000036576148,0.000055402306,0.00012825742,0.0003716377,0.0001746389,0.000024165955,0.0002895613,0.0003702683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010143194,0.00000899674,0.06351876,3.3891075e-7,0.000015299758,0.00003498056,0.0015133775,0.00002133712,0.004026622,0.0006431645,0.92918974,0.0010172492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021460874,0.0000611283,0.07703761,0.000006713767,0.000019474473,0.000020229632,0.00032162527,0.0000042521146,0.00018510621,0.027802326,0.8942142,0.000112709655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012903582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.070875235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06328742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039375078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011037958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229458455","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.19","title":"The Future Is Not What It Used to Be: Longevity and the Curmudgeonly Attitude to Change","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Mind wandering and attention","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"University of Galway; National University of Ireland","keywords":"Boredom; Alienation; Cognitive dissonance; Social psychology; Autonomy; Aesthetics; Longevity; Psychology; Worry; Dismissal; Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Gerontology; Medicine","score_opus":0.10031856436685907,"score_gpt":0.28619609470602214,"score_spread":0.18587753033916307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229458455","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37217966,0.001477754,0.00001950001,0.6247338,0.0011958174,0.00013672524,0.000021040154,0.0000024169422,0.00023328666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93764126,0.0003402134,0.00001712018,0.0605177,0.0012479477,0.0000048635934,2.9387317e-7,0.000010050019,0.00022054094],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901474,0.0001320416,0.00019043343,0.00017311759,0.00024275125,0.0002469019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988765,0.00011650133,0.00008941251,0.00022996128,0.00011164129,0.000575951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036318286,0.000104441024,0.00015085198,0.00008499342,0.00050949404,0.0004958868,0.00030473463,0.000040727984,0.000064457345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002505069,0.00006342913,0.000092299044,0.00026475533,0.000107461,0.00028491367,0.00003488642,0.00024427226,0.0000215645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013289897,0.00021767037,0.010101377,0.0002956705,0.0003725545,0.0061786203,0.15432848,0.00012985915,0.049048625,0.13354917,0.25398684,0.39046213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001622731,0.00022684415,0.009035208,0.00034410806,0.00006804645,0.0007008178,0.0020091657,0.000028864304,0.01614074,0.007144691,0.96232307,0.00035570457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014236102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013308726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70833623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049698614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002262158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7426582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229500299","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100022657","title":"CAN volume 41 issue 3 Cover and Back matter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.04249162278955527,"score_gpt":0.19096647569124908,"score_spread":0.14847485290169382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229500299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045784336,0.011172577,0.000009238775,0.0025835955,0.011938239,0.00010192049,0.0037341865,9.649156e-7,0.97000146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017535286,0.0006747197,0.00008187038,0.0016856225,0.0015681374,0.0000018115766,0.000023196868,0.000043025015,0.97838634],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983617,0.000011734092,0.00080486306,0.0003708206,0.000029351011,0.00042154558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980734,0.000012374391,0.00090114085,0.00027858044,0.00008290756,0.0006515816],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028565488,0.00027944328,0.0008588882,0.0007619715,0.00015315693,0.00017562613,0.00042653072,0.00023004186,0.59201795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020219928,0.00031670122,0.00022260225,0.00010728274,0.0003041764,0.0002077233,0.00004639513,0.00035831353,0.66787624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004889293,0.0000062297227,0.0031440253,0.000056248387,0.00019866784,0.000019537896,0.00067938335,0.0000048064053,6.559717e-8,0.0015239643,0.9943343,0.000027912401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003052145,0.000050155446,0.0006585156,0.00007882901,0.000022197106,0.000036030582,0.000046927602,0.0000042561837,0.000001090544,0.005521521,0.9929409,0.0003343302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062236306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027488402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075858325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002479964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002846417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231568693","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100023043","title":"CAN volume 40 issue 1 Cover and Back matter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Power Systems and Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Contemporary philosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Engineering; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.008963889727628948,"score_gpt":0.1885549037043163,"score_spread":0.17959101397668734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231568693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073344465,0.02494654,0.000121964316,0.009369576,0.02272483,0.00030090276,0.0012549231,0.00003307581,0.93391377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74902844,0.0004418462,0.00028852932,0.0006861651,0.004948156,0.000005339643,0.000034322085,0.00019664907,0.24437058],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896955,0.000012610638,0.00040318444,0.00013687531,0.000114632276,0.00036312104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989196,0.000011940149,0.00016053264,0.0002849556,0.00009091969,0.0005320646],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007645784,0.00030037021,0.0005245197,0.0005573806,0.00005788773,0.000120651755,0.00039460286,0.0006073764,0.026745046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010905107,0.00028486236,0.00011073523,0.000105218125,0.00013259487,0.000104154286,0.000016906311,0.0011634431,0.02579724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013447222,0.0000012091522,0.00019063483,0.00019391229,0.00010400416,0.00009242558,0.00007498065,0.000061542465,0.000053752054,0.000027871607,0.99897337,0.00022496725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015805013,0.00003959457,0.00016183013,0.00029449596,0.000026881275,0.00033049926,0.000009930887,0.000017959683,0.00008571053,0.00037872515,0.99819916,0.00029716475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020494263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015050012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.741694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014633559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003230961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231590544","doi":"10.1017/s004550910002186x","title":"CAN volume 31 issue 2 Cover and Back matter","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; Florida State University","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.032461292396928666,"score_gpt":0.19606742798248153,"score_spread":0.16360613558555287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231590544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006758517,0.011828121,0.000008438767,0.006066036,0.012286349,0.00010987052,0.0034609817,0.0000010041823,0.96556336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008136352,0.0011328503,0.000053498643,0.0020334027,0.002350435,0.0000017587099,0.00003219712,0.000039400176,0.9862201],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828994,0.00001019249,0.0008335239,0.00037996226,0.000033897195,0.00045250257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981103,0.000016383325,0.00085990183,0.00026837818,0.000080150225,0.0006649196],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028238993,0.00028528154,0.00088052487,0.0008061693,0.00017063336,0.00024173423,0.0004011904,0.00023035335,0.48165897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023055669,0.00032867928,0.00021901727,0.00014937473,0.00027635612,0.00020517514,0.000041480722,0.00037470186,0.6152883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043383234,0.0000060152356,0.0030144823,0.000047184905,0.00018036707,0.000035047826,0.00027737525,0.00002843433,1.03147805e-7,0.0006778765,0.99569666,0.000032096596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036025245,0.00004426846,0.00037243628,0.00008135634,0.000019829247,0.00006426667,0.00005193732,0.000008551566,6.975565e-7,0.0028752978,0.99578196,0.00033916152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051836553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025629866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13362934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035892957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033757492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233691394","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100024656","title":"CAN volume 34 issue 1 Cover and Back matter","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.02999347217121624,"score_gpt":0.1930283399488878,"score_spread":0.16303486777767157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233691394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048060066,0.012835494,0.0000127225085,0.0069599925,0.011528678,0.00011499763,0.0043602106,0.0000010654463,0.96370625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027223386,0.000630882,0.0000887666,0.001972762,0.0018204307,0.0000018263263,0.00003176009,0.000044463133,0.9681857],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983252,0.000009379854,0.0008179036,0.00037938525,0.000035298326,0.0004327761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998155,0.000012591124,0.0008451956,0.00026025606,0.000077701356,0.00064924726],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025962223,0.0002857314,0.00086776866,0.0007723572,0.00016910434,0.00023686925,0.0003931084,0.00023071769,0.4431339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021656348,0.00032933423,0.00022455314,0.00012657403,0.00030229136,0.00020501869,0.000040753675,0.00037943514,0.6085556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039152283,0.0000065106815,0.001372348,0.00007118548,0.00018322111,0.000027304131,0.00038912013,0.000071665156,1.2111242e-7,0.0017183579,0.9961361,0.000020101572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045058856,0.000049128113,0.00034063778,0.00012413418,0.000020302241,0.00004687078,0.000055445456,0.00000422899,9.579809e-7,0.006342697,0.9922231,0.00034193226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007254234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032927684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16542171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006247671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005089011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235321937","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100026291","title":"CAN volume 32 issue 3 Cover and Back matter","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Engineering; Physics; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.03653130062689046,"score_gpt":0.18847588152853434,"score_spread":0.15194458090164387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235321937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022579469,0.01634822,0.00000838339,0.0076517104,0.010723996,0.00010251149,0.0041399305,0.0000010076843,0.96079844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012917862,0.0010102877,0.00004873855,0.0018821914,0.0016413553,0.0000016366188,0.000021603839,0.000041493568,0.9824348],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998307,0.000011840672,0.0008255653,0.00038296232,0.00003562788,0.0004369991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981309,0.000016097823,0.00085561164,0.00027350453,0.00007573726,0.0006481162],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024458178,0.00028547944,0.000879623,0.00078863336,0.00017021575,0.0002426005,0.00039577822,0.00023005121,0.6405282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022712677,0.00032945725,0.00022380502,0.00012870414,0.00027951546,0.00020258708,0.00003999231,0.00038022146,0.7001356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025930672,0.000006466924,0.0017431225,0.00005605979,0.0001778248,0.000024067485,0.000358275,0.000023712928,6.67753e-8,0.0006449986,0.9969189,0.000043918888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034453886,0.000044735363,0.00022674388,0.000081623904,0.00002018223,0.000044030847,0.000037594593,0.000024455767,5.505632e-7,0.0018100999,0.9970254,0.00034009287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003143951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013323397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0596074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031541983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016533279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237328850","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100002460","title":"CAN volume 30 issue 2 Cover and Front matter","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Nuclear and radioactivity studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Calgary; Western University; University of Lethbridge; University of Alberta; Université de Montréal; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Environmental science; Engineering; Geography; Physics; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Mathematics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.006437983995110926,"score_gpt":0.1750743921724565,"score_spread":0.16863640817734557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237328850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7224742,0.0061161956,0.000023943277,0.01902726,0.0011295615,0.00011303751,0.00010346416,0.000029314473,0.25098303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962805,0.00008576037,0.00006675983,0.0005922339,0.00063466735,3.3432892e-7,3.9288992e-7,0.00002209144,0.0023172805],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957794,0.00000909125,0.00012476437,0.00005266604,0.00006184644,0.00017367177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955434,0.000006996067,0.000017379556,0.00006988407,0.000021223419,0.0003302037],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000038427504,0.00009053006,0.00015892499,0.00009751833,0.00007162471,0.0000310992,0.00007149728,0.00003845004,0.012439422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000033045603,0.000084640444,0.000042854772,0.00003263218,0.000057801186,0.00009455396,0.0000022640293,0.0001586819,0.0012991823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001360453,0.000011711682,0.019134764,0.000093020375,0.0004075604,0.0005400234,0.0034793399,0.0031770316,0.00014063352,0.0000844573,0.9569813,0.015936527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034091802,0.000066392175,0.031633146,0.000057148212,0.000041487845,0.00024124928,0.00004383892,0.00028517513,0.000039850274,0.001498951,0.9655304,0.00022146617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081796694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005997273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27380627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008199004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041402403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239421796","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100024619","title":"CAN volume 42 issue 1 Cover and Back matter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Environmental Policies and Emissions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Content (measure theory); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Engineering; Physics; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.01176712414881379,"score_gpt":0.2080193852515099,"score_spread":0.1962522611026961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239421796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011875136,0.0030057905,0.0000062972017,0.02052928,0.0021946784,0.00017894508,0.000564624,0.0000012827841,0.961644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21440536,0.00036293452,0.00017170359,0.007809873,0.0026735747,0.00000227499,0.000044506687,0.000081311126,0.77444845],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859595,0.0000453019,0.0003789099,0.00019954806,0.00023309812,0.000547205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975846,0.0000141282035,0.00029451706,0.00025286467,0.000006459316,0.0018474435],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010511446,0.0002997276,0.0003748162,0.00012097918,0.00019032991,0.000060946746,0.00037063117,0.0002579955,0.61815155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005979132,0.0002663136,0.00013634546,0.00009123198,0.00047738818,0.00019437102,0.000091459624,0.0005285404,0.25279406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032095547,0.000010506457,0.010322358,0.00002418159,0.000026797803,0.000017428973,0.00025393447,0.00011090778,0.00008939622,0.0000030029187,0.9889632,0.00017506923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016776625,0.00006240193,0.008845554,0.000103832026,0.000047507347,0.00018010638,0.000021680047,0.00000274666,0.000027907834,0.00017542212,0.99006695,0.00029814005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015694281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007160067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36535746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052715285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010618348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239932915","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100022141","title":"CAN volume 33 issue 3 Cover and Back matter","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.03076383622145451,"score_gpt":0.19150278763375783,"score_spread":0.16073895141230332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239932915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003828883,0.011436889,0.000009117725,0.003964152,0.012576252,0.000104827304,0.004854091,6.273401e-7,0.96667117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005640288,0.0006885631,0.000093581286,0.0026156427,0.0011657753,0.0000017027265,0.000024122137,0.00004183086,0.9897285],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983191,0.000015496822,0.0008166809,0.00037896106,0.000032471606,0.00043731046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981481,0.000014501359,0.0008452606,0.00026679575,0.00007882247,0.0006465411],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030480415,0.00028516192,0.0008752752,0.00072989886,0.0001691447,0.0002297385,0.0003446105,0.00022566735,0.58042574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023994538,0.000329147,0.00021578836,0.0001314332,0.00027119662,0.000187463,0.000028272549,0.00036057644,0.6455413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030190488,0.0000056346325,0.0025013378,0.00005444462,0.00017657579,0.000015732901,0.00026380818,0.000022132397,8.368872e-8,0.0013898744,0.995552,0.000015372134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035484845,0.00004080235,0.00021496588,0.0000689136,0.000019957157,0.000046920024,0.00004818326,0.000005248319,9.528898e-7,0.0025277927,0.9963308,0.00034061391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027946138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001676337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06511556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032318963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032305458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240393498","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100026230","title":"CAN volume 32 issue 2 Cover and Back matter","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Volume (thermodynamics); Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.035891981539634056,"score_gpt":0.18832176743637577,"score_spread":0.15242978589674172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240393498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022242508,0.016490815,0.000008153303,0.0076379064,0.010670356,0.00010219394,0.0041077845,0.000001007287,0.96075934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012599838,0.0010229228,0.000048313515,0.0018859147,0.0016482588,0.000001637947,0.000022084283,0.000041488995,0.98272955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983072,0.000011847898,0.00082556467,0.0003828481,0.000035612244,0.0004368767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981309,0.000016016369,0.0008566337,0.00027339728,0.00007493244,0.0006480787],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024340233,0.00028543104,0.000879743,0.00078839186,0.000170242,0.00024262327,0.000395808,0.00023007151,0.64188445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022454296,0.0003294351,0.0002237772,0.00012865414,0.0002794924,0.0002025693,0.00004001501,0.00038021264,0.69572693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002564705,0.0000064684427,0.0016878291,0.00005563141,0.00017798509,0.000024417737,0.00035857878,0.000023817418,6.439448e-8,0.000659993,0.9969582,0.00004446864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003428009,0.000044881614,0.00022493351,0.00008096073,0.000020324513,0.000044606775,0.000037462436,0.000024302855,5.3688814e-7,0.0018219628,0.99701726,0.00033996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003139843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013311439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053842485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031429488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016453532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241112203","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100024486","title":"CAN volume 37 issue 2 Cover and Back matter","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.033526990621685474,"score_gpt":0.2030208314599253,"score_spread":0.16949384083823982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241112203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004963299,0.014153043,0.000017793645,0.0039279424,0.012441861,0.000105418636,0.0033909054,9.953902e-7,0.9654657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012262555,0.00069201336,0.00009646285,0.0025693073,0.002226697,0.0000010659681,0.000029581692,0.00004313879,0.9820792],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818856,0.000009680522,0.0009018269,0.0003742505,0.000039051956,0.00048661666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980234,0.000020973279,0.00089330226,0.00026056284,0.00009048713,0.0007112773],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045603656,0.00028329677,0.00086180074,0.00081960007,0.00016550755,0.00021323736,0.0003902877,0.0002593418,0.46043473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000250102,0.0003271039,0.00021962775,0.00014779143,0.00030708272,0.00018930403,0.000041323823,0.0004106448,0.594494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053191948,0.000005700913,0.0026160202,0.000057098277,0.0001755852,0.000032069525,0.00032352057,0.000018414417,9.685904e-8,0.00104494,0.99567175,0.00004951231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033891617,0.000044469758,0.0005360661,0.00008053127,0.000018834107,0.000045024935,0.000057203513,0.0000067165424,0.0000011658447,0.0022368233,0.9962964,0.0003378244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041420166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031015373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13405924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035965256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028244677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242955219","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100024334","title":"CAN volume 35 issue 3 Cover and Back matter","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.029596344074373393,"score_gpt":0.19413693603641635,"score_spread":0.16454059196204296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242955219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003933844,0.016025659,0.000006836167,0.0075509045,0.009617289,0.000102394755,0.004210034,0.000001012712,0.96209246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01745701,0.0009444644,0.00009359122,0.0025429726,0.0030946282,0.0000016494602,0.0000282996,0.000042017753,0.9757954],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982945,0.000010985041,0.00084776495,0.00037448917,0.00003497054,0.00043733628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981454,0.000015326299,0.0008581375,0.00026289688,0.00006838821,0.0006498715],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002775093,0.00028373662,0.0008638642,0.0007806319,0.0001631008,0.00023487488,0.00040013567,0.00022838182,0.5459659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001929943,0.0003275335,0.00022063046,0.00011563501,0.0002699097,0.00022636025,0.00004165481,0.00037817948,0.6351437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000386284,0.000006175536,0.0016774769,0.0000445482,0.00017288263,0.00001533948,0.00033211755,0.000043422064,9.9218624e-8,0.0009183467,0.9967125,0.00007324809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035376556,0.000038321894,0.00038188984,0.00008453502,0.000019807001,0.00004014239,0.0000418835,0.000013409458,8.089233e-7,0.0016283172,0.99705845,0.000338693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003979701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000415414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08917781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003739185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003000449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245128375","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2011.0003","title":"Gappy Propositions?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Section (typography); Exposition (narrative); Sentence; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.06847731268393327,"score_gpt":0.2709999338536907,"score_spread":0.20252262116975744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245128375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028888565,0.00038972433,0.0003227563,0.002642449,0.0012379345,0.0000698789,0.000014755662,0.0000074649897,0.9664265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979885,0.0000013310884,0.0004528874,0.0008900748,0.0005481673,0.0000019520567,4.7932707e-7,0.000009294111,0.00010729886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991232,0.000074955184,0.00026510225,0.00011698152,0.00011857518,0.00030115407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986421,0.000024236175,0.00012759847,0.00019061987,0.0001252192,0.00089024956],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028157508,0.00009135826,0.0001396359,0.00023546997,0.00012970145,0.000017049993,0.00041658033,0.00007110792,0.005970717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004901341,0.00007558128,0.000108214044,0.00024414784,0.00044831578,0.0001444163,0.000006865966,0.00024122046,0.0004573565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002470828,0.000035602647,0.00061093766,0.000002058944,0.000027186416,0.00047324953,0.0014742303,1.6975503e-7,0.000033711127,0.9956161,0.00085124664,0.0008508323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023210568,0.00032397063,0.005542182,0.000028375176,0.00002006367,0.00043141103,0.000059006463,6.204754e-7,0.00016944885,0.98998606,0.0031014357,0.000105331885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000753645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023509684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96909994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004945467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027509243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99493796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247515881","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100030149","title":"CAN volume 44 issue 2 Cover and Back matter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.028293930523698423,"score_gpt":0.1907583410158243,"score_spread":0.1624644104921259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247515881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000474101,0.007849178,0.00001946057,0.0056631844,0.012461024,0.000098744385,0.0029720978,0.0000010008931,0.9704612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027261304,0.00042256352,0.000067690395,0.0026428583,0.0023492076,0.0000016584526,0.000029367317,0.000042661748,0.9671827],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983395,0.000014759573,0.00081760506,0.0003755082,0.00003396199,0.00041868302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805886,0.000020130965,0.000918577,0.00028351933,0.00007107837,0.0006478363],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036199656,0.00027793873,0.000924901,0.00073089334,0.00016393684,0.00023780452,0.0004097921,0.00022701437,0.43428278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027255026,0.00031524795,0.0002164377,0.00010331219,0.00028397958,0.00016445247,0.00004260223,0.0003559484,0.6257524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034913444,0.0000042181982,0.0021215465,0.00006699709,0.00015914843,0.000010686482,0.00026667153,0.000027921047,1.01832406e-7,0.0013692275,0.99593407,0.000035906596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033899004,0.000049161943,0.00034309752,0.000085161126,0.000019866144,0.0000319245,0.000030597308,0.00001726571,7.6087366e-7,0.0031518484,0.99559975,0.0003315811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037975507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023283454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19146961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002640762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023813327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247823707","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100023948","title":"CAN volume 36 issue 1 Cover and Back matter","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.026643667141713668,"score_gpt":0.1883025008905841,"score_spread":0.1616588337488704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247823707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004719947,0.011631597,0.000011525561,0.0047122207,0.010287763,0.00010259774,0.005378337,0.0000010190721,0.96740294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017548028,0.00030926123,0.0000714245,0.001515428,0.0021289357,0.000001677995,0.00005064276,0.00004180743,0.9783328],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828887,0.000011218774,0.0008597843,0.00037367502,0.000035064175,0.0004313994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982522,0.000015578313,0.000892436,0.00025374757,0.00007848791,0.00050752936],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026221137,0.00028365696,0.0008656963,0.0007853514,0.00016660793,0.0002477012,0.00037126546,0.00022740556,0.37635535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015939024,0.00032753538,0.00022180553,0.00012499861,0.0002315786,0.00018896854,0.000038186925,0.00034750171,0.5431622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004297123,0.0000061913065,0.0027708884,0.000055407065,0.00013609152,0.000021633388,0.00016777692,0.000043173575,9.260831e-8,0.0009717772,0.9958026,0.000020081363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033590794,0.000037186626,0.000853927,0.00007402586,0.000020033103,0.000033189932,0.000027366805,0.000010985418,7.755483e-7,0.003119877,0.99514854,0.00033819204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009973658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046525383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16680685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033094754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002770313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249841639","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2014.977379","title":"Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Mathematics","score_opus":0.014917465035556927,"score_gpt":0.24651034640750996,"score_spread":0.23159288137195302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249841639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18821038,0.00007220576,0.00032991747,0.08977605,0.004732519,0.000057121466,0.0000036690344,0.000008826706,0.71680933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982909,0.0000010911305,0.00010274964,0.0003841344,0.014118064,1.6737934e-7,6.4442185e-7,0.000003427334,0.0024806873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999498,0.00006289393,0.00012307729,0.000043310407,0.00015549822,0.000117185635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993094,0.000019067798,0.000085807114,0.000045017838,0.00024118542,0.0002995234],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041204452,0.00003276694,0.00006266052,0.0001525765,0.00030896958,0.00004819712,0.00016502997,0.000030984927,0.0011791877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012957794,0.000029363822,0.000049672435,0.000035225952,0.00013585862,0.00016309216,0.0000012654466,0.00009198042,0.00008535377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001618878,0.00000209969,0.000087178785,7.545992e-7,0.0000060175016,0.00000494159,0.00064756745,0.000005291918,0.000004984097,0.9913799,0.0075725117,0.000287096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044049233,0.000021531308,0.00023878893,0.0000046347222,0.0000029743367,0.0000044555977,0.000009536283,0.0000011447614,0.000012130024,0.4842818,0.5153547,0.000024274012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037818204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036305517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79469866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011925763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047284176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250824208","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100022621","title":"CAN volume 42 issue 2 Cover and Back matter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Metallurgy and Material Science","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Computer science; Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.02010060559444933,"score_gpt":0.22947365343202886,"score_spread":0.20937304783757954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250824208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078385726,0.009848409,0.00010342453,0.020337857,0.05159379,0.0005315812,0.001608358,0.0000073480264,0.8375835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.469282,0.0001644673,0.00056801736,0.0045449506,0.009373577,0.000004166208,0.000034722227,0.00007515719,0.51595294],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980636,0.00014414995,0.00056139054,0.0002775956,0.00029569984,0.00065755314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734944,0.000024409068,0.0005766802,0.0002967777,0.00017581433,0.0015768496],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005834346,0.00031958485,0.00060158817,0.00030030325,0.00020268408,0.00030514202,0.00067410286,0.0002953188,0.53858227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003172286,0.00026971093,0.000111975896,0.00012713972,0.0004301081,0.00041460007,0.00005188253,0.00033291694,0.23052348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018041756,0.000009390498,0.0001286245,0.00016194615,0.00002362745,0.000059973714,0.00030871519,0.000015520414,0.009567182,0.00014741163,0.98949164,0.000067905814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019078057,0.00007994123,0.00025305082,0.00020219416,0.000049929786,0.00030336817,0.000007887696,9.081976e-7,0.001741513,0.00060529844,0.9962257,0.00033939822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005262005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004649249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39089626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015825026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011625689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252932439","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100026485","title":"CAN volume 40 issue 2 Cover and Back matter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.02679026419039927,"score_gpt":0.19275265872460243,"score_spread":0.16596239453420317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252932439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009737848,0.0069767763,0.0000070252872,0.00640731,0.017775748,0.00010784815,0.0044464767,0.000001006897,0.96330404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017650142,0.00043685205,0.0001018297,0.0019661107,0.00241386,0.0000017790609,0.000030492496,0.00004368036,0.97735524],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983669,0.000009750663,0.00079129817,0.00037556654,0.000033920518,0.0004225592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980248,0.000017304883,0.0008828648,0.00029824805,0.00008819643,0.0006885853],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003162554,0.000279738,0.00085120735,0.00075667497,0.0001796484,0.00026001487,0.00043805572,0.00031932298,0.5430563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029742012,0.00031683908,0.00021487866,0.00010938131,0.00034243558,0.00020035893,0.00004576474,0.0006261305,0.60477805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004926299,0.0000053759354,0.0018766623,0.00004934765,0.00014487401,0.00001752673,0.000309575,0.000009167315,3.8013812e-7,0.0008727295,0.9966721,0.000037329923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003253754,0.00003713315,0.0005059475,0.00006064118,0.000018853654,0.00004379131,0.000035380377,0.000007952527,0.0000015946456,0.0031231688,0.9955084,0.0003317811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046626553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005391533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061721735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020208358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032498792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253080523","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0020","title":"From the Editorial Office","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Science and Climate Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Operations research; Computer science; Business; Library science; Public relations; Political science; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.023692931485808335,"score_gpt":0.21253601642909983,"score_spread":0.1888430849432915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253080523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9208036,0.00039728792,0.000005859236,0.010182617,0.024559235,0.000050980205,0.000023235287,0.0000037252262,0.043973427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717544,0.000026905891,0.000059611808,0.0007972048,0.027314408,3.9442105e-7,4.2929886e-7,0.0000038490816,0.000042810374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992933,0.000022553711,0.00014574175,0.000077961435,0.0002850209,0.00017538237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999463,0.00006358648,0.000085476866,0.000112676564,0.000020790756,0.00025443293],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016093746,0.000060916205,0.00008575932,0.000019855866,0.0004001223,0.000017789425,0.00040785864,0.0000282685,0.0009296811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010463219,0.000038171587,0.000061216044,0.00015453788,0.00044944373,0.00017725497,0.000021841857,0.00014311026,0.00038480977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008294623,0.0000060267284,0.06243004,1.9538541e-7,0.000011629503,0.00008971737,0.0019584184,0.000057321588,0.00016517151,0.00008779959,0.935001,0.0001843967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035015598,0.000120318255,0.16809326,0.000013738006,0.000021466007,0.00009673226,0.00050983485,0.0000051079887,0.00010335484,0.012781492,0.8177478,0.00015674019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013508235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011494815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1172532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093046576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013549342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253502685","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100024243","title":"CAN volume 38 issue 2 Cover and Back matter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.033684993458355586,"score_gpt":0.19030826058742356,"score_spread":0.156623267129068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253502685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00070473907,0.015300321,0.00001183166,0.0048844684,0.010996103,0.000106104635,0.0041669165,0.000001041553,0.96382844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015877187,0.0018965198,0.00007779497,0.0016861554,0.0019472179,0.0000016623418,0.000030809308,0.000043176202,0.97843945],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983181,0.000011717495,0.00082868244,0.00037685002,0.000036519414,0.00042813455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998125,0.000015727697,0.0008596994,0.00026666853,0.000082707564,0.00065018656],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021198185,0.00028407673,0.00090195244,0.00078036345,0.0002096208,0.00016315348,0.00038567718,0.00022773798,0.4385367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022808272,0.00032757217,0.00023114207,0.00012636588,0.00035705458,0.00019910888,0.000041125717,0.00037447567,0.6080687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003997553,0.0000058590495,0.0022224132,0.0000458153,0.00017687898,0.000040029434,0.00051625294,0.00003007583,7.6222875e-8,0.00038696232,0.9965466,0.000024990479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035019117,0.000044479453,0.00041049297,0.00007036076,0.000013481491,0.00009841493,0.000037325626,0.000009847474,8.445766e-7,0.0015330283,0.99709344,0.0003380861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038970865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014933282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16953203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031604862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035713837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253557469","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100022827","title":"CAN volume 42 issue 3-4 Cover and Back matter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Environmental Policies and Emissions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.011543233962696383,"score_gpt":0.20783927555558518,"score_spread":0.1962960415928888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253557469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011908336,0.0030818814,0.0000064946835,0.020479968,0.0022198986,0.00018181384,0.00054998614,0.000001314929,0.9615703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2158356,0.00037076697,0.00017396403,0.00783515,0.0026998324,0.000002290694,0.0000443458,0.00008282879,0.77295524],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857205,0.000046234483,0.00038586863,0.0002030216,0.00023697068,0.000555881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755347,0.000014344065,0.00029993383,0.00025687803,0.00000662425,0.0018687616],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000107297965,0.000305036,0.00038141556,0.00012340888,0.00019320408,0.000062225656,0.00037668922,0.00026250986,0.6068903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006073181,0.00027118003,0.0001388517,0.0000931321,0.00048472287,0.00019780183,0.00009320088,0.00053663197,0.251898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033034923,0.00001078136,0.010316539,0.00002500723,0.000027432958,0.00001805952,0.00025952174,0.00011384954,0.00009062617,0.0000031540485,0.988948,0.0001837596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017260067,0.00006365216,0.008794985,0.00010561159,0.000048420236,0.00018335291,0.000021924536,0.000002817379,0.000028625844,0.00017954681,0.99009496,0.0003035144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015787896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007243556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35499236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005337465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107994696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255721375","doi":"10.1017/s0045509100025662","title":"CAN volume 38 issue 4 Cover and Back matter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.03456822291147634,"score_gpt":0.19080848965993089,"score_spread":0.15624026674845454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255721375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00071279437,0.015234272,0.000012251162,0.004888881,0.0109656695,0.00010661589,0.0041654794,0.0000010442392,0.96391296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01670508,0.001876712,0.00007871296,0.001687846,0.0019238587,0.0000016643111,0.000030214062,0.000043253578,0.97765267],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983175,0.0000117088575,0.00082897197,0.00037699926,0.000036533213,0.0004283019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981261,0.000015837417,0.000858818,0.00026691143,0.000082083025,0.00065025955],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002131757,0.00028414416,0.00090203667,0.0007809561,0.0002096901,0.00016322275,0.0003859245,0.00022773664,0.43304324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022756403,0.00032765482,0.00023118824,0.00012639926,0.00035714652,0.0001991547,0.000041117655,0.00037447305,0.6082625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040862665,0.000005865644,0.0023021598,0.000045855395,0.00017687629,0.000039623344,0.00051677116,0.000029562552,7.792822e-8,0.00039192103,0.9964625,0.000024684257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035065622,0.0000450768,0.00041578044,0.00007111179,0.000013487098,0.000098140124,0.00003757332,0.000009944281,8.488553e-7,0.0015382941,0.99708074,0.00033833584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003868551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015006433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17521922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031599097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003575589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285336876","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.5","title":"In Memoriam: Kai Nielsen","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Mathematics","score_opus":0.03731360911303395,"score_gpt":0.2892232971140069,"score_spread":0.25190968800097296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285336876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024652474,0.001468214,0.0000031978384,0.042651705,0.003062732,0.000024035258,0.000006727996,0.0000019954775,0.9281289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99170667,0.00012458446,0.00010337346,0.0019052739,0.003089834,2.1707969e-7,4.3103117e-7,0.000005304887,0.0030642878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932677,0.00010483184,0.00018427017,0.000058704998,0.00017095788,0.00015449697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992947,0.000041940235,0.00006912721,0.000047444264,0.00027670254,0.00027008264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031041985,0.000043384127,0.00010387223,0.00012951113,0.00014159443,0.000042842028,0.00017303001,0.00002448092,0.0006776824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043162316,0.0000433743,0.00006201174,0.00018309172,0.0001167804,0.00018714467,0.0000068879594,0.00013298787,0.000047612062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038618286,0.000013779665,0.005281528,0.0000033273186,0.00003211601,0.0019769869,0.0046177437,0.000007922422,0.000021837082,0.9480304,0.039703976,0.00030651875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016871424,0.000017664734,0.002253363,0.000042811098,0.0000044752724,0.000020610667,0.0006395211,4.3307583e-7,0.00003743788,0.06878981,0.92796654,0.000058651847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050243516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13436641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96705425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001659317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012493917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88142914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312125916","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.42","title":"Mental Imagery and the Epistemology of Testimony","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Testimonial; Externalism; Appeal; Epistemology; Internalism and externalism; Mental image; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognition; Law","score_opus":0.04555395362339027,"score_gpt":0.22928907143700436,"score_spread":0.1837351178136141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312125916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53498363,0.019644964,0.00001971629,0.1285153,0.009367076,0.000549389,0.0006795049,0.00001402864,0.30622637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970023,0.000016786547,0.000035598285,0.0016487861,0.0006527054,0.0000028581974,0.0000027997507,0.000010296758,0.0006278517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990962,0.0002301919,0.00032581983,0.000072104456,0.00012516034,0.00015049061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990805,0.00021637657,0.0003070416,0.00011509481,0.00013135692,0.00014963688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070840865,0.000081682774,0.00027059633,0.000156588,0.00054248126,0.000027781112,0.00022417474,0.000020960859,0.00053233735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081231075,0.00005985226,0.00012494042,0.000031927753,0.001873742,0.000079809404,0.00002827734,0.0003812764,0.000002224505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057136614,0.000018109236,0.0006954526,0.000029783652,0.00010427718,0.00009200205,0.024929643,0.000007996391,0.000029488145,0.9668562,0.0066912915,0.0004886564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015673357,0.00044814186,0.00036200904,0.000030189578,0.00011841105,0.00054573576,0.00458932,0.000019036528,0.000032213033,0.75385135,0.23828349,0.00015273318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032078254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046751183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46201867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000456996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038988976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.690388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312843654","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.33","title":"Humanizing Science and Philosophy of Science: George Sarton, Contextualist Philosophies of Science, and the Indigenous/Science Project","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; American Association for the Advancement of Science","keywords":"Science studies; George (robot); Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Art history; History","score_opus":0.06660842288416799,"score_gpt":0.3180924875899514,"score_spread":0.25148406470578344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312843654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8787708,0.0030440611,0.0000032152448,0.0129308505,0.0008931085,0.00069758383,0.00007201794,0.000010315739,0.103578016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984954,0.000119212535,0.000088385605,0.00092832046,0.0003243486,0.0000075381813,3.1533563e-7,0.000009025303,0.00002747087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942751,0.00060827885,0.0007590983,0.0005048287,0.0030381645,0.0008145545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99374235,0.0007609365,0.0011677543,0.00037243046,0.0031372085,0.00081933744],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0442602,0.00019847332,0.0005159386,0.0021921569,0.01428021,0.00037272606,0.0030315462,0.00005310223,0.00006713875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009114642,0.00015161012,0.000094008254,0.007601753,0.16670935,0.0028918807,0.00043739352,0.00068678195,5.841056e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012689878,0.000038379392,0.0015379505,0.000021765805,0.000015360181,0.000025426727,0.07220555,0.0000034324469,0.0033699302,0.9216713,0.000043242002,0.0009407767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016466035,0.0011096118,0.0020191458,0.00012031089,0.0000796764,0.00018681568,0.057870876,0.000027375861,0.0013220279,0.9145224,0.020638008,0.00045714635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006882131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055838685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15242913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000666082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02965123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312978531","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.37","title":"Engaging with Science, Values, and Society: Introduction","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Contemporary philosophy; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02056637495489308,"score_gpt":0.25827185234995415,"score_spread":0.23770547739506107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312978531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5075718,0.006737113,0.0000947511,0.27305147,0.005092438,0.0002892937,0.00002185937,0.000026844767,0.20711441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977973,0.00002374032,0.0002754979,0.0005441577,0.0010444882,0.0000014991184,2.5581878e-7,0.0000037415737,0.00030933402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991914,0.000105746454,0.000108221524,0.00010964183,0.00026243666,0.0002225567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940914,0.000030542174,0.00010062996,0.00005800504,0.00013327145,0.00026840437],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016778375,0.000049408496,0.00009940502,0.00016818248,0.0042790542,0.00004363841,0.00018782211,0.000015722413,0.00008321672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008503285,0.00004569176,0.000031560707,0.0004231428,0.0016198005,0.0001721556,0.000020972586,0.0002706112,7.196754e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005420517,0.000038634684,0.045996632,0.000028708231,0.00024313085,0.0002808523,0.37011573,0.00020862925,0.00010186785,0.50687116,0.07024777,0.0058126687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009000308,0.0008556032,0.014416534,0.000027562026,0.00011006681,0.00073705247,0.19969936,0.000015866242,0.00004802651,0.24212667,0.54065627,0.00040693607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014474518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018642751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4902255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025066073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021350968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99701726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319924539","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.47","title":"Acting on Behalf of Another","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; University of Toronto; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Normative; Representation (politics); Phrase; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.05881144750015435,"score_gpt":0.30120136883030185,"score_spread":0.2423899213301475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319924539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12681569,0.00032375663,0.000020167898,0.05733583,0.0018035758,0.0001924338,0.00015272934,0.00001441644,0.8133414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639803,0.0000020065477,0.000070540606,0.002100956,0.0012164783,0.0000022504798,9.541162e-7,0.000020412203,0.00018836992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982308,0.00030637038,0.00037128924,0.00011308211,0.00057085376,0.0004075875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985388,0.00015717212,0.00029650453,0.00015752578,0.00016291774,0.0006870853],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078209775,0.000098429984,0.00022904399,0.00046511705,0.0006498564,0.000026982947,0.0005480865,0.00004912364,0.0021883762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044986623,0.0001054465,0.00017764582,0.0003723418,0.00032386035,0.00014827149,0.000021492335,0.00044943864,0.000020291962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039328785,0.000077222314,0.001930217,0.000013218759,0.00006666963,0.00027840678,0.012471165,0.00020235062,0.00014105684,0.9775451,0.005275605,0.0019596526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000599563,0.0008390585,0.00050049176,0.00007988479,0.00004541138,0.00002796252,0.0030681512,0.0000040374716,0.00040722336,0.6117142,0.38241637,0.00029768774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010237052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004893334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86958236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047007095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017834217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99872375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322631638","doi":"10.1017/can.2023.3","title":"Reason in Kant’s Theory of Cognition","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Transcendental number; Epistemology; Dialectic; Philosophy; Transcendental philosophy; Articulation (sociology); Normative; Extant taxon; Argument (complex analysis); Categorical imperative; Transcendental idealism; Morality","score_opus":0.05402437146103098,"score_gpt":0.22072132059148758,"score_spread":0.1666969491304566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322631638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36138374,0.0027337396,0.00001094177,0.017020425,0.0020231968,0.00019009443,0.00047926835,0.000008450824,0.61615014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983276,0.000010627454,0.0000061307487,0.00095570163,0.0005985797,0.0000029590497,0.0000064021997,0.000013868765,0.00007809418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989372,0.00022637885,0.00037716457,0.00007834956,0.00021494912,0.00016598527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914455,0.00013569384,0.00024533336,0.00010157219,0.00016364071,0.00020918397],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010516508,0.00008337961,0.0002079865,0.00048724603,0.00022495064,0.000023572857,0.00024480803,0.00003076071,0.0037533436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013021707,0.0000802324,0.000117505464,0.000076990924,0.00033278618,0.0001204105,0.000018650388,0.00056635786,0.0000059047698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006281307,0.000037217847,0.000049998263,0.000017047494,0.000027660475,0.00010361592,0.006378297,0.000033699704,0.00002625646,0.9924425,0.00013467201,0.00068623095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037910463,0.00023664335,0.0000781993,0.00006472927,0.00002151973,0.000026572994,0.0010144868,0.0000051148077,0.000026999225,0.9761318,0.021928292,0.00008655852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008249587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004882864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6369439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009027487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005376442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99715734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323912230","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.36","title":"Indifference to Anti-Humean Chances","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Pittsburgh; York University; University of Michigan","keywords":"Deference; Principle of sufficient reason; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08500891616053127,"score_gpt":0.24697262138926027,"score_spread":0.161963705228729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323912230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88491946,0.0015725046,0.000027291944,0.021720046,0.007269083,0.00018708142,0.0002652357,0.000014803233,0.08402449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931659,0.000007202097,0.000039807877,0.0037953067,0.002047722,0.0000039913666,0.0000033638426,0.000014263227,0.00092245004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990854,0.00009077371,0.00026383746,0.000107590786,0.00020200343,0.00025037263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990365,0.00004081165,0.0001854252,0.0001322555,0.00016880773,0.00043619933],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033072534,0.00010382703,0.00023351153,0.00035276177,0.00071484235,0.000076957134,0.00040179375,0.000022327087,0.0015754829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004245613,0.00009871118,0.00011086407,0.000067468594,0.00023284616,0.0001236986,0.000024183664,0.00045209602,0.0000327469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012231761,0.00003191466,0.0013684737,0.00003095232,0.00009697672,0.00023554229,0.11148993,0.000026965106,0.00006605378,0.8753756,0.0097220205,0.0015433162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019848146,0.0004695121,0.0005711003,0.000034486755,0.000034566456,0.000052333908,0.0026291052,0.000002071706,0.00004882718,0.44564587,0.5501235,0.00019011606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022148734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018780213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5404015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008934076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005624359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362471104","doi":"10.1017/can.2022.46","title":"The Problem of Hard and Easy Problems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","keywords":"Phenomenon; Consciousness; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.04299688540851725,"score_gpt":0.1857080538215043,"score_spread":0.14271116841298703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362471104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14780135,0.02163926,0.0000069699254,0.05654174,0.0030212994,0.00054732035,0.0003149575,0.000017555043,0.77010953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800456,0.00001849941,0.00006116203,0.00033954522,0.00044038813,0.000004310704,5.5586264e-7,0.0000075681046,0.0011234037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918276,0.000050538827,0.00028497953,0.0000821697,0.00022778421,0.00017174854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992119,0.000037683225,0.00027064042,0.000099464,0.00013832537,0.00024200663],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005015802,0.00007339594,0.0001353832,0.0001793066,0.0016112792,0.00007597857,0.000384134,0.000010545194,0.0004062912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012192743,0.00005469534,0.000072286246,0.000052958225,0.00092011713,0.00019235557,0.000022658163,0.00023861467,0.0000026266873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013168225,0.000013296523,0.00019604623,0.000023246343,0.000025908925,0.000021882603,0.013726169,0.000045662706,0.00006566893,0.97954726,0.004963136,0.0013585588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013175333,0.00030080558,0.00009950351,0.000020302825,0.000011169822,0.00004861937,0.0005589551,0.0000045420643,0.000004393539,0.27850115,0.7202568,0.0000619832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009775397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055243876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8502032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007346162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047993538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387024138","doi":"10.1017/can.2023.26","title":"Clearing up Clouds: Underspecification in Demonstrative Communication","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Toronto Scarborough; University College Dublin","keywords":"Underspecification; Demonstrative; Assertion; Linguistics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Computer science; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.08128888291980375,"score_gpt":0.32191495406613224,"score_spread":0.2406260711463285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387024138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35345325,0.0006658721,0.00023877763,0.024985641,0.0012997531,0.00017947429,0.000013980993,0.000026655196,0.6191366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994256,0.000020707734,0.00006773625,0.00022047594,0.00018035992,0.0000027966155,0.0000029530195,0.00000888287,0.00007047927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989609,0.0001876796,0.00032943944,0.00012491617,0.00012851243,0.00026855318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990098,0.00015339756,0.00015371839,0.00024940225,0.000089481604,0.00034423755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073605526,0.00007980147,0.00013748286,0.00044459364,0.0001267258,0.00003250915,0.00046572453,0.00008181751,0.00028917284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013432096,0.00007796658,0.00006053669,0.0008446932,0.00035266823,0.0001687055,0.000013063394,0.00035557602,0.00029286335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019319374,0.000011493676,0.0016681344,0.0000020319344,0.000012268214,0.000065040855,0.002771717,0.0000308687,0.000051998242,0.9933546,0.00046549062,0.0015470303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033743578,0.000069033464,0.037788816,0.00006276683,0.0000060318794,0.000035587607,0.0012615032,0.00004405321,0.00003298137,0.9593296,0.0009401241,0.00009203331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007111022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023670564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6459724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001494695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020793671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37642634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388569367","doi":"10.1017/can.2023.30","title":"Natural Kinds: The Expendables","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cegep Edouard Montpetit; Université Laval; Université de Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université de Sherbrooke; Université Laval","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Natural kind; Realism; Philosophy; Scientific realism; Philosophy of science; Natural science; Aesthetics; History","score_opus":0.057839912628985704,"score_gpt":0.21566337112230907,"score_spread":0.15782345849332335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388569367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1046467,0.005136562,0.0000022751528,0.09705677,0.01363581,0.00017677167,0.000092731614,0.00006192724,0.7791905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99318326,0.0000109999755,0.0000074713034,0.001380069,0.0030569457,0.000001291854,0.000001808875,0.000009823313,0.0023483194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991701,0.000031643624,0.00022550893,0.000088633955,0.00021776915,0.00026634452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992397,0.00005430792,0.00013235574,0.00014281757,0.00014839243,0.00028247223],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003266013,0.000095567855,0.00012986387,0.00037269312,0.0009811633,0.00017083595,0.0005872601,0.000021291107,0.0009931575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000571624,0.00006250164,0.00012900893,0.0001200152,0.00084681535,0.0003897095,0.000011539975,0.00025997046,0.0003513124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006936483,0.000004941034,0.00004090299,0.000008466664,0.000025858311,0.00020067334,0.02249583,0.000015368962,0.00005298062,0.86696136,0.10926063,0.0009260341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001118085,0.00006508112,0.00016350421,0.000036883815,0.00001056207,0.000037744874,0.0011943282,0.000013670787,0.00001418136,0.2027543,0.7955013,0.00009662337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009865626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013935012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8885366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066724824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042279076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389397857","doi":"10.1017/can.2023.36","title":"On the Practical Significance of Irrelevant Factors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Scarborough; University of Toronto","keywords":"Worry; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Gray (unit); Subject (documents); Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.1705623482703091,"score_gpt":0.2948098967463087,"score_spread":0.12424754847599959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389397857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77096987,0.0002701791,0.000021052136,0.08194695,0.0047067753,0.00025771005,0.00021225878,0.000020960228,0.14159425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976757,0.000012411433,0.000010449201,0.00079417066,0.0008831256,0.0000011374856,0.0000021855587,0.000013634298,0.0006071879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911207,0.00011574799,0.00030021215,0.00007736373,0.00019259198,0.00020198895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982712,0.0008316946,0.00027139002,0.0001582153,0.00024650892,0.00022093627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049850123,0.00009653702,0.00020856404,0.0001867272,0.00022712909,0.000041618798,0.00020624818,0.00004671539,0.00041464117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005899938,0.0000606255,0.00015431279,0.00007142887,0.00065113895,0.000099297875,0.0000059025324,0.0004418691,0.00006617915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008889534,0.000012438957,0.00013667888,0.000019344574,0.000057627112,0.000061301274,0.0095128445,0.000011827948,0.000037759324,0.97468835,0.015387975,0.00006495799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018202998,0.00039951308,0.00067374296,0.00011184632,0.00005869439,0.000010720186,0.0037936727,0.000011883816,0.0003157135,0.8267802,0.16751884,0.00014312491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010596357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061538205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22670583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003765503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006436647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.454003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396616221","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.8","title":"Fear within the Frames: Horror Comics and Moral Danger","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Comics and Graphic Narratives","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Comics; Aesthetics; Contemporary philosophy; Philosophy; General interest; Art; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Literature; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05067188155447039,"score_gpt":0.22463498704582324,"score_spread":0.17396310549135285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396616221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88471675,0.0018402413,0.000003830184,0.05469684,0.0019365863,0.00017724874,0.00016189624,0.000031135238,0.05643545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969994,0.000021972986,0.000018818526,0.00080177677,0.0008538667,9.882423e-7,0.0000018756567,0.00001982755,0.0012814762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995278,0.000028939843,0.00016482014,0.00006110216,0.0000821444,0.00013518831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946344,0.00004107283,0.000117689255,0.00009643805,0.00006672542,0.00021462217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002057686,0.000079738755,0.00012636418,0.00025498483,0.00035424484,0.00016492751,0.00015890555,0.000025325542,0.00013340876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030981075,0.000052582247,0.00006075218,0.000071939554,0.00043717952,0.000085302134,0.000010678215,0.00020206661,0.000010326047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006880863,0.0000034039936,0.0010078697,0.000007804337,0.000054452517,0.00007255886,0.03234108,0.0000060380844,0.000007834097,0.9104701,0.05578852,0.00023341736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005016201,0.00022072412,0.0013723128,0.00010303275,0.00004400818,0.000058963957,0.013703808,0.00021230649,0.000010177949,0.64325744,0.34028393,0.00023170374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017757221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03854045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2844954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012646338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015119277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97900367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398773515","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.14","title":"Creature Features: Character Production and Failed Explanations in Fiction, Folklore, and Theorizing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Folklore; Character (mathematics); Knowledge production; Production (economics); Aesthetics; Epistemology; Literature; Philosophy; Sociology; History; Art; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.020500177826327105,"score_gpt":0.26191090086966473,"score_spread":0.24141072304333763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398773515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779766,0.0020092265,0.0000131043635,0.0068482533,0.001483832,0.00016263356,0.00003395355,0.000016042171,0.011456323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801767,0.000096703756,0.000026108833,0.0002605329,0.0009587043,0.000007861549,0.000018541448,0.000012667473,0.0006012051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993262,0.000084669104,0.00019821161,0.00014358695,0.00007839445,0.00016891764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994759,0.00004132109,0.00010721981,0.00008916029,0.00009320132,0.00019320386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030993184,0.00008811141,0.0001327738,0.0006869228,0.00011747185,0.000043232758,0.000055210952,0.000096301366,0.00012279538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013536816,0.00007717137,0.000032782526,0.00033858218,0.000054229156,0.00019475394,0.0000031027487,0.00027245775,0.000012133664],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008145519,0.00022183434,0.18429677,0.000380052,0.0010846131,0.004522252,0.20176366,0.000038188977,0.0060297223,0.4181299,0.12971178,0.0530067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012810967,0.0002068588,0.8598875,0.00037372185,0.00010061735,0.00095225684,0.007871378,0.000004555619,0.00015403226,0.1159579,0.012894799,0.00031529504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005210905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043770103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6755907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003486046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006487245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31469572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399054263","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.18","title":"Autonomy, Community, and the Justification of Public Reason","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Uppsala Universitet; Vetenskapsrådet; McGill University","keywords":"Autonomy; Contemporary philosophy; Public reason; Epistemology; General interest; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Democracy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.1667340605976644,"score_gpt":0.33579575405468065,"score_spread":0.16906169345701624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399054263","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1453335,0.00082342455,0.00004836853,0.568959,0.0007113786,0.00018983855,0.000041209012,0.00002122505,0.28387204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887323,0.000077303936,0.000020867083,0.0004631635,0.0004690916,0.0000011524318,0.000001994754,0.000005293907,0.000087927394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982581,0.0009890913,0.00025986476,0.00004407558,0.00021166251,0.00023718564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980213,0.0008440266,0.00016890519,0.00015342332,0.00028417504,0.00052817183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053090965,0.000054502103,0.00015231865,0.00021800621,0.00084214803,0.000065727334,0.00041197936,0.00008971208,0.000028494956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028279482,0.00004182359,0.00007196035,0.00042103577,0.002024926,0.00019065605,0.000018660647,0.0004963314,0.0000112108355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004477714,0.000004971161,0.00039530115,0.000012920643,0.00001599496,0.0000036534934,0.012591025,0.0000019300146,0.000003083022,0.98513097,0.0004717211,0.0013639577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000263795,0.00002712609,0.0028554641,0.000037541216,0.000022758819,0.0000047902467,0.0023439238,0.000017303726,0.0000067657306,0.9697106,0.024661155,0.00004877331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021113085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018938188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8535397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011010965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020188047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403952721","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.30","title":"Opportunity Costs and Resource Allocation Problems: Epistemology for Finite Minds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Resource allocation; Resource (disambiguation); Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.12312714624079654,"score_gpt":0.2737110599725582,"score_spread":0.15058391373176164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403952721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3759087,0.0060390765,0.00065224065,0.26077804,0.009299259,0.00240008,0.0015033461,0.00016058,0.34325865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932592,0.000036806665,0.000073076764,0.001877049,0.0016478099,0.0000108680115,0.000054798988,0.000025303856,0.0030150802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990381,0.00010221873,0.0003686866,0.00012721038,0.00009248796,0.00027130957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983861,0.0003384345,0.00027191322,0.00013193185,0.0003732078,0.0004984535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008202727,0.00011860632,0.0002569488,0.00037091662,0.00038521225,0.000073561634,0.0001673466,0.000095254814,0.00006880911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032135766,0.00011213307,0.000099640936,0.0000615474,0.0005412041,0.00014382861,0.000010295888,0.00024969626,0.000013372865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034650096,0.000021683807,0.0005167641,0.00028154513,0.00014731224,0.000095927135,0.022633767,0.00004490371,0.00003541577,0.93895835,0.030168626,0.007061039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049582135,0.00037249067,0.00021728987,0.0001157019,0.00006498921,0.000043322194,0.001224921,0.000071220034,0.000015631786,0.27769744,0.71952176,0.00015941702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010567871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02301791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6893531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068753245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059832836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99480945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405483114","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.40","title":"Kant on Hope’s Value and Misanthropy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; New York University Shanghai","keywords":"Humanity; Hatred; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Theology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05974680944149803,"score_gpt":0.24922708153567022,"score_spread":0.18948027209417218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405483114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30891714,0.0013198099,0.0000040564305,0.14636447,0.0035804273,0.00016091479,0.00020395765,0.00004631638,0.5394029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943734,0.00007493768,0.0000064516425,0.002923404,0.0023647118,9.174458e-7,0.0000026826492,0.000021491072,0.00023204119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914473,0.00005555946,0.0002519428,0.000113255264,0.00018460333,0.0002498949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989292,0.00012752145,0.00010794055,0.00012472467,0.00012992218,0.00058068644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041453834,0.000122050165,0.0002000758,0.0004171187,0.00037797948,0.00012814187,0.00018387062,0.00005912388,0.00057850266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013072294,0.00009796305,0.00009802815,0.0000675647,0.0005991107,0.0001164973,0.000012415974,0.00040331698,0.00015938727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014025728,0.0000081895,0.000018677221,0.000016391172,0.000036243324,0.0002940412,0.0033842267,0.000009916953,0.000013586211,0.9933897,0.0022109165,0.00060406997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023760453,0.00023928376,0.00010131669,0.000110181805,0.00001601724,0.000023525163,0.00020227143,0.000020692554,0.000018183444,0.86429995,0.1346182,0.000112747985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082913844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021557903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6854562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003879176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029828053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6334199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405483150","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.43","title":"What Perceptualists Can Say About Reasons for Emotion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Rationality; Argument (complex analysis); Perception; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Value (mathematics); Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.0798975742085794,"score_gpt":0.3394371427687065,"score_spread":0.2595395685601271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405483150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94005233,0.00086060155,0.00009499325,0.042299856,0.009692015,0.00036929912,0.00040474316,0.000036996724,0.006189168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99397296,0.00003662864,0.00013471155,0.00088353,0.0011949143,0.000013011718,0.00005797797,0.000034270844,0.0036719893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989909,0.00006421465,0.00030991135,0.00015100298,0.000109526394,0.00037444333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869215,0.000043845943,0.00015220624,0.00021811952,0.00023523523,0.00065840967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030805063,0.000120633485,0.00019696559,0.000539793,0.00020057875,0.000092552786,0.00021743542,0.00011756555,0.0008998558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006117699,0.000117188974,0.00020199893,0.00031509384,0.000091146394,0.00020450298,0.000005570162,0.00019191964,0.00016725775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009127165,0.00013380875,0.01646999,0.000072949646,0.0002759663,0.0014890351,0.027525945,0.000052622174,0.0006793631,0.25413048,0.6314433,0.06763523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036446752,0.0015640304,0.56528205,0.00087585795,0.0003944098,0.0011681728,0.014273508,0.00001908391,0.00007168596,0.077936105,0.33383706,0.0009333636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024168168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013963328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54881203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014473003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036051034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.985279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405829446","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.33","title":"What constitutes the health subject?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Obesity and Health Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); General interest; Contemporary philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.10541524367428522,"score_gpt":0.4327454672663393,"score_spread":0.32733022359205405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405829446","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02168535,0.12586486,0.000089188485,0.7910418,0.023218224,0.00060965493,0.00004650512,0.000037029695,0.03740739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96083117,0.0038960148,0.000101395955,0.02968025,0.004378825,0.000007143448,0.0000030322694,0.000022602637,0.0010795913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977826,0.000661796,0.0006746494,0.00012294833,0.0002036758,0.00055436516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971652,0.0011389898,0.00035261136,0.0001950787,0.00021059417,0.00093752553],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025268944,0.00011682498,0.00026343905,0.0003284061,0.0017163736,0.0001517009,0.00031940916,0.00011881024,0.0015339475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029416653,0.00007699647,0.000107291526,0.0003123878,0.00020327632,0.0011235382,0.000015395884,0.0017058881,0.0010429285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051016697,0.000022516939,0.0057202745,0.0021247305,0.0001753484,0.00067578536,0.02844188,0.000009854206,0.000005213045,0.49974605,0.4490512,0.013976114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019092255,0.00017656414,0.0013513365,0.0028895326,0.000026694592,0.00010501129,0.0038680835,0.0000132195455,0.0000015564802,0.045784343,0.9455076,0.000085122316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008276763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09230009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9391458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039856715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01610289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406593447","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.49","title":"Transferred Culpability and the Problem of Voluntary Intoxication","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Culpability; Contemporary philosophy; Psychology; Philosophy; General interest; Law and economics; Epistemology; Criminology; Economics","score_opus":0.022412572026451673,"score_gpt":0.22402895944877596,"score_spread":0.2016163874223243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406593447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92309475,0.004777201,0.00028125793,0.057166092,0.0005746399,0.00031725853,0.00007391824,0.000011514874,0.013703383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993919,0.00005971936,0.0000673336,0.00028142502,0.00016417471,0.000001425438,2.6433338e-7,0.000005630055,0.00002814139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935424,0.00008515602,0.00025264706,0.000098581644,0.000110019384,0.00009935974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954927,0.00010343314,0.000047369165,0.00009050361,0.000038106195,0.00017132897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029500786,0.000059825456,0.000116287294,0.00011860646,0.00006951167,0.000032366755,0.00018019207,0.000026513442,0.00005221773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007452897,0.00003697465,0.000079863894,0.00020236873,0.00040924017,0.00016642167,0.0000043135456,0.00017114275,0.0000029891723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020191577,0.000065002154,0.003007603,0.00074472197,0.000074359144,0.00035287064,0.013185537,0.00007638769,0.09677814,0.8105874,0.0031201611,0.07180591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008344217,0.00025224907,0.003935396,0.0003303171,0.00007429011,0.00039380937,0.0000658518,0.0006209497,0.019612333,0.9584385,0.015279363,0.00016248862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074919255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010231277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14785114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031013304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031763106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15078625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410132230","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.11","title":"Kant on the Theoretical Use of the Ideas of Reason: A Transcendental Interpretation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Princeton University","keywords":"Philosophy; Transcendental number; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); General interest; Transcendental philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Transcendental idealism; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04577995721313702,"score_gpt":0.23030685003607468,"score_spread":0.18452689282293766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410132230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6386092,0.002940227,0.000084095016,0.17104204,0.004139616,0.00041242898,0.00063449284,0.000014379068,0.18212351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983429,0.000013936189,0.0000033232939,0.0010338173,0.0005572023,0.0000010350268,8.2424253e-7,0.000014217768,0.00003275675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989944,0.00016614291,0.00036865566,0.00007991612,0.00026654755,0.00012431866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989198,0.00046758313,0.00013071518,0.00017068052,0.000166548,0.00014467794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048117587,0.00010093353,0.00017296668,0.00013789782,0.00012713872,0.00009545578,0.00031442242,0.000051766285,0.0008351384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022455977,0.000050652423,0.0003122771,0.00006525908,0.0014978491,0.00012211213,0.000009040665,0.0005206444,0.000006301801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053204247,0.000016449176,0.000008467229,0.000039356364,0.00008598797,0.000025591064,0.009170082,0.000011383061,0.00005854831,0.9900004,0.00017470782,0.00035582334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089068984,0.00017959464,0.00004110591,0.00076740375,0.00006275597,0.000025590267,0.00024134367,0.00018550285,0.00022118594,0.9927959,0.005332201,0.000058349728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031563547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001240834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3597337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042272848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003754463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.914418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413876466","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10019","title":"Bergmann’s Intuitions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; General interest","score_opus":0.0776643556991139,"score_gpt":0.25904500497105193,"score_spread":0.18138064927193803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413876466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01741108,0.012551682,0.00014102751,0.052256532,0.014445068,0.00011628359,0.0002628421,0.000047440473,0.9027681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899186,0.000028459886,0.000052014337,0.0011862613,0.0056897136,0.0000013290895,0.0000052649475,0.000019230245,0.0030991584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993312,0.000038545266,0.0002606643,0.000084248786,0.00010005362,0.00018531556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992152,0.000068103815,0.00006396501,0.00010301985,0.00021019169,0.00033951196],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022824317,0.000092205024,0.00015745878,0.00034623893,0.00024022655,0.00020556727,0.0001694072,0.00004901698,0.0013610808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044218537,0.00007982904,0.00018086855,0.00004547847,0.00041684372,0.00026028662,0.0000048023726,0.00042083382,0.0001943147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012282362,0.0000056170675,0.000015530151,0.000043735985,0.00007549998,0.00022609215,0.012089678,0.0000030213146,0.000006752372,0.9568421,0.029641034,0.0010496799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043273463,0.00005966961,0.000011931977,0.00010062047,0.000036943904,0.000044773802,0.00028661243,0.000004362565,0.000008122077,0.44881228,0.5505288,0.00006256397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014255659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032919567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9725075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007460081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078814715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414217285","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10017","title":"A Harm Reduction Approach to Attitudinal Racism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Toronto; Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Harm; Racism; Normative; Harm reduction; Phenomenon; Public policy","score_opus":0.070026348184652,"score_gpt":0.34359619141129805,"score_spread":0.273569843226646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414217285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.107453436,0.002868692,0.0009194792,0.07972837,0.013817289,0.00023123613,0.000015799327,0.00003898325,0.7949267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922496,0.000018663084,0.00033739884,0.00058534025,0.005802785,0.0000029609546,7.126255e-7,0.000009939795,0.0009926134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991602,0.00008611382,0.00019994084,0.00012569061,0.00017241,0.0002556599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990566,0.000017623934,0.000046484263,0.00006203788,0.0001312492,0.00068602175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004798363,0.00006970796,0.00012780644,0.0003707804,0.00027448367,0.00012366477,0.00024333072,0.000086955435,0.00025197346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009617686,0.00006614502,0.00012273322,0.0004506767,0.0001879548,0.00022371605,0.000004686647,0.00024960522,0.00013334768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002688528,0.000039340277,0.00022749552,0.000022788729,0.00012642758,0.00019962607,0.0644827,0.000011478578,0.0003613906,0.72709,0.18656619,0.02084568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001431225,0.00019164143,0.0011883851,0.00011901287,0.000036841877,0.0002029023,0.0036367544,0.000004533374,0.00002020237,0.13466989,0.85960895,0.00017775706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054686484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019682674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88479614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003011196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089889485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8266997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415169570","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10022","title":"Conspiracy Stories","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University College Dublin; Canada First Research Excellence Fund; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta; University of Aberdeen; York University","keywords":"Function (biology); Contemporary philosophy; Social function; Social relation; Social theory","score_opus":0.051693840476313035,"score_gpt":0.32607018318945563,"score_spread":0.2743763427131426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415169570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049488265,0.003993374,0.00013092786,0.050633743,0.0042663543,0.0000797138,0.0000240491,0.000027426395,0.89135617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968621,0.00003926331,0.00006021895,0.0009423329,0.0012022645,6.585397e-8,4.6470745e-7,0.0000044411404,0.0008888495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994116,0.000035599893,0.00017296379,0.00003162582,0.00018196627,0.00016625549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990402,0.000044496468,0.00005227257,0.0000452253,0.00013491214,0.00068291137],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044947956,0.000043250548,0.00007370383,0.00027233182,0.00023597984,0.00024575935,0.00014247457,0.00004098396,0.0012071577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035043288,0.00003821995,0.00006026652,0.00023500633,0.00016937139,0.00064257823,0.0000018208709,0.00013868489,0.00013342765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018965347,0.0000018617238,0.0001300335,0.000014830964,0.000022200225,0.0001645137,0.06756844,0.0000048421757,0.000004175805,0.85208905,0.07047231,0.009525836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055593795,0.000030408462,0.00014861608,0.00007356676,0.000007730582,0.000025020094,0.0025956354,0.0000042629445,0.000010477903,0.039048143,0.957946,0.000054529457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037923215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01301684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9473738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016873122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037027725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416232585","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10034","title":"Hussain on the Market: Critique or Kvetch?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Universiteit Utrecht; Fordham University; Dartmouth College","keywords":"Complaint; Order (exchange); Capitalism; Property (philosophy)","score_opus":0.03275297266715872,"score_gpt":0.305169837577336,"score_spread":0.2724168649101773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416232585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025549384,0.00011393325,0.000035005047,0.23035575,0.0005432231,0.00006905509,0.000008772678,0.00000338163,0.76631594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697594,0.000028320685,0.000032540058,0.023558082,0.0007368391,0.000002339825,1.2643596e-7,0.0000040973537,0.0058782487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907714,0.00022365538,0.00022310218,0.00007279188,0.00009739494,0.00030593603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873376,0.00049431314,0.00006565018,0.00011412917,0.0000878974,0.0005042554],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010592465,0.00006669312,0.00012460024,0.0001726476,0.00047207103,0.00007991878,0.00039512545,0.00007595675,0.0019800235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016041594,0.00004472531,0.00009292509,0.00018658886,0.00035171796,0.00010567787,0.000006389967,0.00026999068,0.000027546035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012634406,0.00000585392,0.00010905953,0.0000033782064,0.000018090459,0.00006202419,0.00042748317,4.7318719e-7,8.518342e-7,0.9398011,0.05765979,0.0018992708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000812688,0.000033030254,0.00036999243,0.00006624077,0.000007719181,0.0000029850332,0.00037795008,0.0000011994118,0.000015268335,0.42888182,0.5701205,0.00004202887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073516993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065504454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96720445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022247247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026776507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416301688","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10032","title":"Introduction: Remembering Waheed Hussain","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Slogan; Sympathy; Relation (database); Politics; Political philosophy; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.017407949926813344,"score_gpt":0.2531626574842556,"score_spread":0.23575470755744224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416301688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00823664,0.0027897602,0.000057912253,0.18515159,0.006498908,0.00006781123,0.000002301034,0.000008737777,0.7971863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98443186,0.00007781173,0.00015520876,0.0008441411,0.00672038,7.992922e-7,2.77993e-7,0.0000052077826,0.0077642915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993566,0.00005556397,0.0001925277,0.000073669165,0.00012111569,0.00020051003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994389,0.000023950553,0.00008915466,0.00008278777,0.00019069847,0.00017451149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047112556,0.000053487922,0.00013102304,0.00027497814,0.00069176237,0.000031115163,0.00019112439,0.000045839748,0.0004096843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025852298,0.00005569052,0.00007805806,0.00027850308,0.0002565752,0.00009794775,0.0000063939287,0.00016118068,0.000014993115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006741875,0.0000048827123,0.0005375485,0.000009657883,0.00005235822,0.00004672111,0.006328119,0.000014616704,0.00002648561,0.74349487,0.2454857,0.0039922884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012400984,0.000015478709,0.00045530466,0.000031678177,0.000016444183,0.000003325403,0.0012454336,6.79197e-7,0.0000069494195,0.029857028,0.9681908,0.00005290697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009543172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.088040225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9761952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005267887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014381451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416598408","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10036","title":"Freedom and the Invisible Hand: Hussain on the Judgment-Bypassing Character of the Market","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Toronto","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Production (economics); Property (philosophy); Invisible hand","score_opus":0.032477334367969644,"score_gpt":0.27010117412629486,"score_spread":0.2376238397583252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416598408","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03399945,0.00054446195,0.000011749294,0.64129204,0.0010080888,0.00019510991,0.00002391353,0.0000022089714,0.322923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98592275,0.00003778464,0.0000096146505,0.012767695,0.0007697677,0.0000019214733,1.3118658e-7,0.0000052199284,0.00048509237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983585,0.0006693321,0.0002981183,0.0000853048,0.000309374,0.00027939075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981177,0.0010828453,0.00019307935,0.00021918122,0.00014483326,0.00024236568],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023494319,0.000094657844,0.0001900373,0.00011699398,0.0012942778,0.00014775986,0.00061228545,0.000101674144,0.00011067892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014965578,0.000045574365,0.00015142263,0.0002968125,0.00314734,0.00010879485,0.000030553212,0.00061212166,0.0000021546573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003406982,0.000007766119,0.00044473982,0.0000097207,0.00004597689,0.0000036297718,0.0027783304,0.0000023917576,0.000019227156,0.9909191,0.0054626805,0.0002723625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048158487,0.000028103947,0.0037277907,0.0002929099,0.000052771582,0.000002561423,0.0005480649,0.00001537198,0.000095742376,0.9458063,0.048885096,0.00006367674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058216243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008405098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9519233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110576235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012908957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416598509","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10033","title":"Patterns, Prices, and Powers: Hussain on Market Governance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Toronto; York University","keywords":"Corporate governance; Market failure; Market system; Economic governance; Free market; Traditional economy; Nonmarket forces","score_opus":0.015979419331976847,"score_gpt":0.19428230957855613,"score_spread":0.17830289024657928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416598509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20691746,0.008064729,0.0005910355,0.013186092,0.002029911,0.00012572824,0.0006244303,0.0000063944817,0.7684542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996494,0.00026756612,0.000092437294,0.001981868,0.00018585772,0.0000012841023,0.0000014222546,0.00000690253,0.0009686611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999229,0.000011376707,0.00042657251,0.00014729267,0.000012881462,0.00017284574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925387,0.000041437717,0.00030215638,0.00015839006,0.000022363301,0.00022177708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038728348,0.000096377735,0.00023771502,0.00029784272,0.00013050514,0.0000625366,0.00020976909,0.000062607774,0.00064219267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001292132,0.00011022638,0.00007822575,0.000107653366,0.00007486813,0.00023440184,0.000009952697,0.00019404467,0.000050794195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013288624,0.000010822265,0.021344658,0.00002064799,0.00004422923,0.000022736636,0.000068131136,0.000014699051,6.660093e-7,0.9728195,0.0050957236,0.00054486445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062095723,0.00010926822,0.04686619,0.00026750483,0.000008240424,0.000025923639,0.0000389185,0.000038258622,0.000016425698,0.58449155,0.3673372,0.00017953529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006079862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010817306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78957653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020273431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017952034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70315593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416768482","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10037","title":"Boyle’s Elusive Egoism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Ethical egoism; Object (grammar); Contemporary philosophy; Common ground; Cartesianism","score_opus":0.02663639664261033,"score_gpt":0.21185423151371843,"score_spread":0.1852178348711081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416768482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054574083,0.0016431988,0.00007906828,0.025034934,0.0042347,0.00006870171,0.00002599218,0.0000092153305,0.9634468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907245,0.000005193666,0.000040981395,0.0031396057,0.0014454772,9.101711e-7,7.001446e-7,0.0000061907954,0.0046364367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991601,0.000032545217,0.00031508887,0.00010768059,0.00015278877,0.00023178023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895835,0.00004416855,0.00012911322,0.0001421363,0.00030657704,0.00041964132],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018289451,0.00010461178,0.00019511038,0.00047978933,0.0004940926,0.00011108184,0.0004160813,0.000040631247,0.00094501604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012060618,0.00008915131,0.00014438854,0.00012114906,0.00040795218,0.0002706796,0.0000098118935,0.00025829248,0.000083015984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056333497,0.000010031872,0.00005810701,0.0000098017845,0.000021527958,0.00008095986,0.004144856,0.000005769183,0.000012353665,0.9590775,0.035933785,0.0006396775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012919621,0.00006187392,0.000049372025,0.000049072827,0.000015400417,0.0000076083606,0.00013186505,0.0000035317987,0.00001232472,0.41243875,0.58702713,0.00007385291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015835387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008624397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9852671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020400308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009354081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118363983","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10048","title":"Aiding the Impermissible? Kant and the Morality of Medical Assistance in Dying","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leverhulme Trust; Università di Catania; University of Toronto; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; McMaster University","keywords":"Morality; Duty; Public morality; Applied philosophy; General interest","score_opus":0.04104709792010615,"score_gpt":0.27069176917266174,"score_spread":0.2296446712525556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118363983","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2992142,0.009921386,0.000030297013,0.5438629,0.001053196,0.00018245183,0.000026752441,0.0000041425405,0.14570469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966383,0.00009804122,0.0000034838754,0.0028279258,0.0003895572,0.0000015341487,2.3945978e-7,0.0000050983253,0.000035809182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988402,0.00020566898,0.00044194024,0.000078757264,0.0002730268,0.00016040733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988741,0.000494711,0.00017434522,0.00014513318,0.00013144912,0.00018023058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026031248,0.000086117594,0.0002541219,0.00016611579,0.0003285822,0.00010739884,0.00043931947,0.00006554815,0.00017407261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005368339,0.00004522485,0.00009125552,0.000087566295,0.0017034786,0.00009113065,0.00003007354,0.000671992,5.742468e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035682726,0.000006783761,0.00023992814,0.00003859605,0.000035702516,0.000034161138,0.004614044,0.0000030179897,0.0000039570805,0.99444646,0.000074729425,0.000466953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006741916,0.000017345084,0.00028982034,0.000424322,0.000022792996,0.00001080827,0.00060814415,0.00013764498,0.000010679282,0.9901539,0.007599862,0.000050507275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040561077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0219645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6974241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004344088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079453737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7157158287","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10043","title":"Agency and Objectivity: Gomesian Faith or Cartesian Clarity?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Faith; Agency (philosophy); Objectivity (philosophy); CLARITY; Omniscience; Defeasible estate; Denial","score_opus":0.03544088546000915,"score_gpt":0.24543252651944825,"score_spread":0.2099916410594391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7157158287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06513289,0.0032960149,0.00007311254,0.08791132,0.002252187,0.00022663659,0.00012652572,0.000024766556,0.8409565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994562,0.00003885135,0.000032133652,0.0032818653,0.001159479,0.0000017871708,0.0000015456556,0.000015720727,0.0009066622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989699,0.00009664012,0.00034670022,0.0001576162,0.00014476394,0.0002843949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987857,0.00012722507,0.00013837106,0.00017489234,0.00023277556,0.00054108945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042987967,0.00016728498,0.00032056344,0.0005350249,0.0005064249,0.00022882235,0.0002481531,0.000111793655,0.0006488156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018945351,0.0001308276,0.00012236346,0.0001066287,0.00062634505,0.00027084022,0.000020263811,0.00063050934,0.000010087003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029038092,0.000017925133,0.00019370127,0.00005458139,0.00008580106,0.00025060473,0.0040349527,5.21384e-7,0.000008165463,0.99222267,0.0004931862,0.0026088716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034918232,0.00016628648,0.0006120627,0.0001668211,0.000054799748,0.00004112493,0.0002670271,0.0000062437575,0.000008807261,0.91034,0.08784666,0.0001409849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022107505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04655164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92942905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008677919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013346265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9708463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W788527436","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2002.10716513","title":"Welfare and Outcome","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Slogan; Egalitarianism; Outcome (game theory); Economics; Consequentialism; Positive economics; Appropriation; Pareto principle; Philosophy; Conviction; Law and economics; Epistemology; Law; Mathematical economics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.10814562091882202,"score_gpt":0.3108222958571961,"score_spread":0.2026766749383741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W788527436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024031233,0.0016109516,0.000008799018,0.36839208,0.0007537271,0.000060857856,0.00002004708,0.000009485175,0.60511285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99613196,0.00004018961,0.000074885684,0.0022959402,0.0012096614,2.8489237e-7,1.5956121e-7,0.0000069335542,0.00023997894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990676,0.00009107076,0.00024314143,0.00007253506,0.00020744701,0.0003182175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982947,0.000070540445,0.0000830664,0.00007797108,0.00013576829,0.0013379403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042115973,0.00007178864,0.000150776,0.00017081808,0.0005766972,0.00006546658,0.00020845208,0.00011581117,0.0008010105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000603612,0.000068051966,0.00007422814,0.00013794497,0.0005933246,0.00022168622,0.000006021492,0.00034296568,0.000037868365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010671818,0.000005539092,0.004084947,0.000007105364,0.000009984907,0.000106467305,0.002690994,6.213009e-7,6.6299475e-7,0.99151593,0.00080547284,0.00077122595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019952415,0.000062332634,0.0019408261,0.000025787846,0.000019994099,0.00003246624,0.0003647376,0.0000040237705,0.0000017159371,0.67764705,0.31957597,0.00012559693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044537596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008254863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97210073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010186201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017638189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87705034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W791193263","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2003.10716553","title":"Reconsidering Structural Realism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific realism; Realism; Epistemology; Philosophical realism; Scientific theory; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Nothing; Commit; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Direct and indirect realism; Philosophy of science; Computer science","score_opus":0.1196767269245939,"score_gpt":0.21397565200574545,"score_spread":0.09429892508115155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W791193263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15960643,0.0016379745,0.000005663168,0.004173622,0.004622043,0.00006212717,0.00003063522,0.000011693234,0.82984984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974141,0.0000037861098,0.00015843027,0.00076040486,0.0011642971,3.9663044e-7,5.233416e-7,0.000010018504,0.00048803657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992128,0.000038804068,0.00028132382,0.00009741632,0.00013714172,0.00023252882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990094,0.000023004197,0.00017563453,0.00011992059,0.00017215285,0.0004999324],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022854976,0.00010315861,0.0001650808,0.0003079151,0.0005590996,0.00011909654,0.00022429346,0.000029217936,0.0023742528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009523555,0.00009309109,0.000106265514,0.00004076535,0.00051751325,0.00045528985,0.0000027977112,0.00020770908,0.00003709222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027078306,0.0000021819503,0.00008175908,0.000007078041,0.000014498675,0.00012316463,0.011365669,0.000009700434,0.000032816184,0.9846744,0.003386908,0.0002991065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016027328,0.00008800926,0.000038340815,0.0000388235,0.000011779025,0.00021072573,0.00046032993,0.0000019918157,0.00006123464,0.5359018,0.46289417,0.00013252832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005649019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015421216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83780766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101781116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005802067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W829168491","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716587","title":"Inferentialism and Singular Reference","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Expression (computer science); Generality; Epistemology; Extensional definition; Relation (database); Object (grammar); sort; Philosophy; Linguistics; Proposition; Inference; Binary relation; Order (exchange); Mathematics; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Arithmetic; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.03508942666289962,"score_gpt":0.2845320885942227,"score_spread":0.24944266193132308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W829168491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29572308,0.0022461456,0.00032373477,0.020115638,0.0009210871,0.00007363868,0.000019525383,0.000009868714,0.68056726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974986,0.000007387378,0.00031109073,0.0012120203,0.0008825285,6.472256e-7,7.124661e-7,0.000007698749,0.00007931642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991355,0.00006839737,0.00026003987,0.00013261789,0.00012614208,0.0002772943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987502,0.000045636534,0.00011771594,0.00015569398,0.000097793396,0.00083293096],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002816672,0.0000987301,0.00015873132,0.0002009651,0.00011930408,0.00004699643,0.0002751687,0.000086628024,0.0015068408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080695965,0.0000847353,0.000049998413,0.00014187337,0.0004036047,0.00017097611,0.000011746734,0.00027255304,0.00011025921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011696559,0.000013111816,0.0003648136,0.0000021941025,0.000019025607,0.00009672783,0.00058322854,0.0000014942913,0.0000791514,0.9895629,0.0003649477,0.0089006685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042177792,0.00017543226,0.0046396027,0.000041614956,0.00002549397,0.00035135364,0.00002899279,0.0000072346875,0.00008324102,0.93174464,0.062329438,0.0001511657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040278246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055312965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7017755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045232693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018711116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}